Category: Trailer Park

  • Trailer Park: STAR TREK – Review / Eric Lange of LOST

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    So, I was able to sit down for a couple of years and pump out a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

    And now, you can follow me on Twitter under the name: Stipp. This week saw all sorts of conversations about the horribleness of Wolverine and the promise that Star Trek would easily dethrone the big cat with claws at the box office this weekend.

    ***CONTEST – THE FALL AND RISE OF REGINALD PERRIN***

    rp_3dWhat was just a fleeting opportunity to promote another DVD turned into something of a curiosity to me.

    I had never heard of The Fall and Rise of Reginald Perrin, for the most obvious reason that it was on the BBC in the late 70’s, but after watching a few clips I have to admit I am more curious to watch this and am wanting to give you rascals the chance to see what could be just the thing to get me going as all my other shows on television are dipping below the surface, not to return until the fall.

    I have a few copies of the series on DVD. If you’d like a chance to win one just shoot me a note at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com and let me know your favorite BBC program. It’s as easy as that.

    More about the show:
    Michael Scott of “The Office” didn’t write the book on career disillusionment. Back in the “˜70s, Reginald Perrin was fighting his own demons at Sunshine Desserts. The BBC’s “The Fall and Rise of Reginald Perrin” starred brilliant actor Leonard Rossiter (Barry Lyndon, 2001: A Space Odyssey) and aired from 1976-1979 to great critical and popular acclaim. The darkly-comedic series featured an outstanding cast of Britain’s best ““ Pauline Yates (Darling, “Peacekeepers”), Sue Nichols (“Coronation Street”, “Crossroads”), and Geoffrey Palmer (A Fish Called Wanda, Tomorrow Never Dies). This spring, E1 Entertainment brings all 21 episodes, plus “The Reginald Perrin Christmas Special” to DVD for the first time. THE FALL AND RISE OF REGINALD PERRIN: THE COMPLETE SERIES arrives in-stores as a 4-DVD set on May 12 for $59.98 SRP.

    The DVD release of “The Fall and Rise of Reginald Perrin” is sure to excite classic British comedy fans, as will the revival of the series by the BBC this fall. BBC One has announced that Martin Clunes (“Doc Martin,” Shakespeare in Love) will play the title character in “Perrin,” which will be written by the original series writer and creator David Nobbs with “Men Behaving Badly” writer Simon Nye.

    Eccentric sales executive Reginald Perrin is disillusioned with his life and unrewarding job at Sunshine Desserts. As the stresses of his mundane life surface, he pushes the boundaries of acceptable behavior at work. Finally, Reggie reaches a breaking-point, his mid-life crisis leading him to an extreme attempt at escape. He leaves his clothes on a bench at the beach, and fakes his own suicide. Instead of starting a new life somewhere else, Reggie tours the countryside assuming a variety of disguises ““ from buck-toothed pig farmer to pompous explorer. In his attempt at finding fulfillment, he discovers he truly misses his wife, and he returns home to start a brand new life. But, will he fall back into the same old routine again and again?

    STAR TREK – REVIEWED

    “How often people speak of art and science as though they were two entirely different things, with no interconnection. An artist is emotional, they think, and uses only his intuition; he sees all at once and has no need of reason. A scientist is cold, they think, and uses only his reason; he argues carefully step by step, and needs no imagination. That is all wrong. The true artist is quite rational as well as imaginative and knows what he is doing; if he does not, his art suffers. The true scientist is quite imaginative as well as rational, and sometimes leaps to solutions where reason can follow only slowly; if he does not, his science suffers.” – Isaac Asimov

    star_trek_poster1After thinking about the highest compliment I can confer on this film it would be this: I want to see this movie again.

    Something I didn’t realize I’ve missed after all the films I’ve seen in the last year is the innate sensation after the credits roll when you know you could sit through another viewing. That moment when you honestly could sit back down in the theater and watch the movie all over again with the same pleasure as you did before it started the first time. What JJ Abrams has managed to create is a summer film that bridges the chasm between those who have simmered in the Star Trek universe broth for decades, and explains to some degree why the franchise was in such dire straits as the latter films sputtered towards extinction, and those of us who just want to be entertained by a thin story and giant explosions.

    JJ delivers on all the elements necessary to crafting a great mass market summer film starting with an opening reminiscent of BAMBI, FINDING NEMO and any other Disney film when a child needs to learn the tragedy of life from the get-go. What the first 10 minutes feel like is JJ finding his groove and to lay the foundation of what’s to come; the sequence establishes the tenor and mood of the entire film. So many times you have an opening sequence that seems so well-crafted that the next hour and 50 minutes couldn’t possibly live up to the great first chapter when you realize there was never enough in the tank to go more than a mile. JJ seems ballasted by not only knowing what is needed for every moment to feel weighty, in that every moment feels like it belongs and adds something extra to the overall whole, but his world as he’s creating it feels real.

    Now, reality as I’ve come to define it after seeing STAR TREK is one that has rules but has to convince others to believe the reality. Keeping in mind we’re talking about warping star ships, phasers, drills that are miles long that can burrow into the center of a planet, interdimensional time warps and scads of other nuanced things that simply are not real. However, JJ and Co. manage those observations in a delicate balance of delivering superb special effects but not leaning on them like a crutch, an awful disease that many directors have succumbed to as of late. It’s the actors, deigned with the opportunity to bring a fantastical script to an even more apparent reality, that deserve some notice and praise.

    Chris Pine (James Kirk), who up until this point charmed me in his turn as a twisted and demonic hillbilly in SMOKIN’ ACES, does a superb job playing the would be/will be Shatner. He carries himself with a hint, a whiff, of obnoxiousness that makes his role one that exudes a swagger rolled up with the classic underdog trope of a boy who needs to become a man. His boyhood mischief, his bar room brawls are nothing more than flimsy set-ups to show the depths of which he’s lost in his own PR and male bravado as a Lothario that never can seal the deal with Uhura (Zoe Saldana). But, and this is key, it’s the moment when Kirk meets Bones (Karl Urban) when you can feel the velocity of this film taking hold and never relenting. It’s also the time when we meet up with a young Spock (Zachary Quinto) who lives on planet Vulcan. What’s silly, of course, is to suppose this is all happening on a real planet removed from the safety of Earth’s natural berms and landscape but Abrams wills and makes Vulcan seem like a planet; the effects here are slight but rich in impact. He gives his situations, and all situations from start to finish, a polish, a thin veneer, of reality. Yes, Vulcan exists. Yes, cops of the future do ride motorcycles that fly. Yes, it is possible to beam from a ship to a planet’s surface; all the while, mind you, of never compromising the intentions of the actors in the scenes they’re in.

    Kirk’s eventual rise to power as the ship’s captain is an intriguing one if not completely predictable, and there is a lot of goofiness to be had in the moments leading up to the logical blocks that are put in front of him from even being allowed ON the Enterprise, but these are all quibbles with the film’s focus on creating a summer movie. You could find yourself straining at wondering at the logical issues concerning the film’s villain Nero (a one-noted and camouflaged performance by Eric Bana) and his actions, however, this would take away from the sheer delight in wondering at the sight of John Cho (Sulu) kicking in some Romulan head during the film’s first real hand-to-hand combat scene, witnessing the fate of the first red shirt to go into battle and feeling the physics involved to make me believe that this all seems plausible as a viewer. Suspension of disbelief is not enough in this film as JJ takes the effects to a level that should cement this movie’s place as one of the more intensely enjoyable movies of the summer movie season.
    [ad#contestbox]
    As well, when you consider all the personalities that need to be juggled, from introducing an entire ship’s worth of STAR TREK regulars to the plot that can get a touch convoluted if not completely unbelievable, Abrams manages to make you care about each one of them. Now, the depths to which we care can be debated but for the core cast of regulars there isn’t one throw-away moment for any of them especially when you consider the handful of characters that seemed to be much for lesser directors of recent summer films. It is important to give everyone the chance to be meaningful to the film’s progression, for if they weren’t why even be included in a script and, at that point, if they were I could guarantee a troubled film, and JJ does that. From Chekov’s minor miracles to Simon Pegg’s (Scotty) delightful and atmospheric comedic relief at a moment when the film delivers one of the more emotionally charged scenes STAR TREK is a record that knows what speed to play at without ever speeding up or slowing down unnecessarily. The movie is filled with enough crags and crevices which bring us to the penultimate moment but to explain them would spoil the fun of witnessing the birth of a franchise that finally is able to appeal to those like me who are familiar with the characters but aren’t beholden to the rigid back history of the iconic series. This isn’t to say, though, the film doesn’t have some issues.

    The musical cues seem a little too ostentatious at times and threatens to take over the production and, unless you’re Ray Charles, there is no way not to notice the copious use the many lens flares that JJ seems to use as if he were a little kid just shown how to fire a gun; he loves using both almost to the detriment to the picture. The writing, as well, could be picked apart and dissected like a splayed open frog in biology class but, really, if you’re going to take issue with a summer film which is specifically designed to generate income and to be one of the few movies to help a studio make its annual nut you need to understand a few theories of basic economics. Which isn’t to say JJ has to make an inferior product, and he absolutely does not, but it’s important in understanding that the movie is not some artistic vision that can stand up to scrutiny if you were to compare it to a film like MILK. These kinds of films, these summer films, are made to entertain and to hopefully coming back for more. I already know this film is a special one in that I am already thinking about when I can see it again.

    Forget WOLVERINE, STAR TREK is the real beginning of your summer.

    ERIC LANGE of LOST

    eric-lange-as-radzinskyThere’s this great Night Court episode that has always stayed with me ever since I saw it air decades ago. Harry, played by Harry Anderson, has to convince a very deranged woman who is brandishing a grenade in his court that what she sees on television is not reality. The blend of humor and the very not funny threat of someone dying was emblematic of a series that blurred the line of what a sitcom was. So, too, is my love affair of Lost.

    A program that has dared me to leave it more than once and a program that keeps finding ways to bring me back, Lost provides audiences with the kind of drama that looks to challenge traditional methods of storytelling on television. So, it was with great anticipation that I was able to talk to Eric Lange, who you all know by the name Stuart Radzinsky and rocks a beard like no other on that show, wherein I was able to find out more about the man who has become synonymous with supreme jerkitude on the series. The “others” may be mysterious and wanton in their violence and malevolence towards others but Lange is just plain mean.

    It was a pleasure, then, to talk to the actor playing Radzinsky. What I found was an actor just excited to be playing a role like this, in a series like this. His passion for the craft was something refreshing when you consider how far gone other performers can get when they stop seeing the ephemeral winning lotto ticket in their hand. Eschewing any question that even tiptoes the line of “What can be expect from the season finale…” I instead wanted to know more about him as an actor, a working actor, and what this opportunity means to his career.

    From ditching the series as a viewer to realizing the importance of bug spray there couldn’t be a better jerk on television who I hope finds success after he finds his way off the island. The series finale airs this upcoming Wednesday, May 13th on ABC.

    CHRISTOPHER STIPP: I’ve been reading a little bit about you as an actor and what led you here to Lost. I’m really just curious to find out, at least to start off things with what happened from 1998 and 2001 where there doesn’t seem to be much from you?

    ERIC LANGE: ’98 and 2001? Well, to be honest, when I first moved to LA I couldn’t get an agent or get anyone to represent me theatrically so I was doing a lot of theatre which is sort of my roots ““ theatre and commercials ““ and every now and then I got friends to come to a play I was in and toss me a job here and there. That’s what the Bold and the Beautiful is and my early, early jobs. But really they were just from people that knew me at the time.

    So it’s really all I was doing.

    Then after that it just of moved into commercials. I was doing commercials for about 7 years here and making a living that way and saying I was a working actor but I obviously wanted to be making movies and scripted television. So then I ended up doing another play years later and a friend of mine brought her manager to the play and he picked me up. After that things moved relatively quickly because I had all that time here doing commercials and theatre to just sort of marinate and get ready for the day I was going to be able to get into rooms and I would be able to work relatively quickly. So that’s sort of the reason for that gap.

    CS: Certainly after that it looks like Lost is the longest time you’ve spent on scripted television.

    LANGE: Yes. I had smaller recurring things on other shows earlier. LAX, the Heather Locklear/Blair Underwood show I was on for just a little bit and just prior to Lost I did a show called 26 Miles which was like a 6 episode pilot basically. It was made to be sold as a half season and then a network or studio would pick up the other half of the season. So, that was 6 episodes and that was my longest stint and now Lost is a little past that, so you are correct.

    CS: So how did this come into your life? Was it one of those things where you were just out on auditions or were you asked to audition for it?

    LANGE: Yes, my manager called and said you need to audition for this or that and I was particularly excited about this because I wanted to do something on that show for so long I just had the highest respect for it and wanted to be on there. The show I had done previously, the 26 Miles pilot, I had about 6 months before that started and I was going to do it and I had to change rather drastically. My hair was always rather short so I spent all this time growing my hair out and this beard and so I thought if I’m ever going to be on Lost, now is the time to do it. I got the beard, the long hair, I can pop out of the jungle. I could say I was on the plane, or I was an accountant, or something.

    (Laughs)

    So, I just went in to audition. It’s not a typical audition with them. Usually you go to meet the producers in an audition ““ and the writer ““ but with Lost because everybody is in Hawaii you’re really just reading for the casting director and somebody films you and they mail the tape off and you either get it or you don’t. So it felt like such a simple process for what became such a great job. You know?

    CS: Yes, and an interesting character too. We all know how he ends up but it’s really interesting to see how he gets to where that finite end is. Could you speak a little bit about how… I read in a previous interview where there really wasn’t so much direction given to you regarding these origins of the character but you were allowed to make him up – as it were?

    LANGE: The original audition ““ I know I’ve spoken about this before ““ but they didn’t even have the name Radzinski on the audition side it was this Marty Jankowski guy. So that’s who I was auditioning for initially. So, when I got the job they called and said you are playing Radzinski and the name sort of rang a bell. I wasn’t sure why it was so secretive but that’s how a lot of things are on that show. I ended up googling him and found all these web pages about him and immediately got very nervous about the shoes I had to fill.

    It was evident that there were a lot of fans that were curious about him and what he knows and why he offs himself and all these different things and I though, boy, I have a lot of people to please. So I ended up calling my manager and said is there something they want me to know? Now, knowing where we are going to take him eventually, or if they will, knowing where he ends up in the bible of Lost, is there something they want me to know now that I could put in play and the answer was a pretty definitive no. They said, “No, if we want him to know something we’ll tell him.” It was good in a sense because I had the information about where the guy’s going to eventually go and I had the scripts and the words they give me are rather strong clues to what kind of person he is. But I did get to work a fair amount on my little back story and sort of create this guy from scratch. The guy we’ve heard about but never seen.

    200px-eric_langeCS: And you mentioned something about Lost having something close to a bible. The pantheon of fans out there…that there’s no detail that goes unnoticed with the people who really dig this show. How was that knowing that every tick, every peculiarity is poured over? I don’t know if you ever now gone back to see what people are talking about and see if people are really on the mark or off the mark with about what’s to come later on in the season?

    LANGE: You mean in terms of what they were picking up about him before him even being seen or since I started on the show?

    CS: That’s interesting. I would be interested in hearing both. First of all, we caught glimpses of him and now that you are fully realized ““ what people are saying now about the character.

    LANGE: Well, you know. Let me think. I just want to make sure about what you are asking. You are asking how I feel about what people are saying about the guy now that he’s out there?

    CS: Correct. Now that people have had the chance to see you, what are they saying about you?

    LANGE: Well, I don’t have a lot of fans. Let’s put it that way.

    (Laughs)

    I’m hoping people are enjoying it but obviously he’s a thorn in the side of our heroes at this point and it is interesting that he’s so hot blooded. That does contribute to someone who could put a shotgun in his mouth. He’s a wildly passionate individual and it was sort of assumed early on that the guy had some wild knowledge about a lot of things and now we find out that he was the architect of the Swan so he’s been credited with being a genius or scientist. But, no, the few things I’ve been sent from friends and from what I’ve seen on the internet is pretty hard to read sometimes.

    (Laughs)

    I’ve been called all sorts of names. He’s a problem child but in terms of my fears about living up to the expectations of the fans. I just said I’m going to make what I make and hopefully they can get behind it. The thing to me about playing people like that is as long as there’s justification for the way they act, people can get behind it. And with him, we are sort of catching him in the middle of a period for him. In the middle of building the Swan and his work with Darma and so I just created this thing in my head that he was sort of told a story that he was going to be this big deal there and when he got there there were all these other people running around and touching his stuff and running projects and he sort of wanted to run the show so that’s the place I’m taking it from now but there’s got to be ways to justify the way he’s such a complete pompous ass he is and certainly leaving people curious enough without just hating the guy and writing him off, which is a danger.

    CS: Correct. And this is one of the, and I don’t want to say tightest written series on television for sounding too hyperbolic, but looking at the scripts you are being given week after week, how do you respond to something when you are used to going on some of these shows, doing an episode and then leaving. Looking at a script where you are not allowed to know some things but know others… how does that all work in a cohesive sense when there are so many things going on at once?

    LANGE: It’s tricky because you don’t know anything really. You know that at the end of some episodes that if there’s a story line left untold you assume that they will come back to it. So you do see some sort of arch but don’t know exactly where it’s going to go but it’s actually kind of exciting. I remember being in Hawaii at the hotel and the day that the scripts would come out running down from the Lobby wondering what the heck am I going to be doing this week. It’s been exciting. When you do one spot on one show you are gone. You don’t get that kind of thrill.

    Every now and then it’s a little jarring, oh my goodness the things they have me saying and doing, the character they are forming as I find it in the script week to week and sometimes I find it a bit jarring and I have to go into my justification pile as say why is this important to him. And the bigger picture that this is sort of like war to him. He’s sort of like a general in an army and there are possible enemies lurking around and gaining information and that’s life and death. A lot of things on Lost aren’t life and death. But it’s a pretty curious thing. I sort of see him as a policeman who is jus trying to protect what they built and what they are working on and he just happens to get quite agitated when things don’t go his way, if any of that makes any sense.

    CS: It does. You are now the 4th person I’ve talked to from the cast in the many years it’s been on. You hit a central theme when you say it’s all a matter of life and death and everyone who I’ve talked to says life off the set and in the set while you are working on it couldn’t been a more congenial and open and warm place to be.

    LANGE: Absolutely.

    CS: How have you responded to that sort of climate as an actor?

    LANGE: Coming from doing one show at a time, mainly a guest star here and there, you sort of get thrown into this family that you don’t know but they have been working together for years and you are trying to look like a seamless part of this giant machine they have created. Sometimes the families are friendly and sometimes because they know you are leaving that week there is really no attempt to make any conversation or environment where you might feel more comfortable. Going into Lost when I first got the job I only knew I was doing two episodes. That was the deal. So I thought, well two episodes but I was a little intimidated because of the size of the show and the scope of that show and I thought, “My God, what if these people are monsters? What if their ego’s have gone to their head because they are on this giant train that is Lost?” And I could not have found anything farther from the truth.

    I mean, from day one they were the most down to earth, friendly, there was no ego involved, just acceptance and I felt like I was part of the crew right away. They were really wonderful in that way. And when you are comfortable like that you are just able to do better work. You feel better about yourself, you can trust in what you are doing better and it’s just nice to have that support. But throughout my entire stint there I just grew closer and closer to those people and have a huge amount of respect for them on their behavior on the set and their generosity really. And, the crew is the same way. The crew is a lot of Hawaii based people, very down to earth, very kind and really it is funny how sort of light hearted the set is. It’s not that anyone’s careless about their work but it really is like a very friendly place to be. I had an absolute blast there.

    eric-langeCS: And one of the interesting things about the show itself too, for how many years it’s been on, you don’t hear anything about any petty sort of in-fighting or anything associated with some programs that are on a very long time that most succumb to. Any ideas of how they’ve managed to avoid needless drama?

    LANGE: I don’t know. I’m always amazed when I hear about the drama on these things. It’s like you think when you get a job on that level you would just be happy to do you job and go home. I think part of it has to be because they are so removed. Being there in Hawaii is like you own little camp. Like you go to Lost camp. And they are not right there in Hollywood hearing about the bickering that goes on or seeing the power plays that get pulled. I think to some degree everyone just really likes being on the show and happy with their jobs and happy to be a part of something that has such an impact on culture in television. But, I think the distance is a big thing because when you get there it’s not like Hollywood. It’s Hawaii ““ a much different environment and relatively laid-back, peaceful place to be. I think it engenders that on the set as well.

    CS: One of the things that I think makes you a perfect representation of Lost is that I read that you bailed on the series for a little while and then came back to it as you boned up on your part. I would think that any Lost fan agrees that this season just outshines ““ the writing is better, it’s tighter…How do you think they found their groove back? What’s your take on why it’s so good this season?

    LANGE: Well, my take is that ““ I did. I hate to say it but somewhere at the end of season 3 I thought, boy, they did such a good job the first two seasons at peaking interest and creating mysteries and things I was just so curious about and wanted answers to, and they kept stretching them out.

    And now my belief about why they did that is because they didn’t know how long they were going to be on the air. They didn’t know how long they were going to have to keep these things a mystery.

    So I think for a while there it sort of felt like they were treading water. I don’t know if this is the fact or not but I got the sense of having to keep these story lines afloat because what if we are doing this for 10 years. And now that they have given themselves an end point, now they see a finish line and they are saying, what do we need to get in before the finish line? And it’s much easier to plot and plan and really build things on a more detailed level I would guess, episode to episode knowing they only have this many to go. So I think they are really sinking their teeth in and challenging audiences and giving everyone a great run for their money and a great piece of television.

    CS: One of the other things that you brought up was that largely, the production is very picturesque. It’s done outside in Hawaii. What kind of challenges does filming on a beach, in jungles, in that kind of humidity present from day to day?

    LANGE: That’s where I give props to their crew. I see these guys in season 5 and a lot of these guys are Hawaii based so they are used to working in that and used to working some adverse conditions and they are incredibly adapt at it. It’s amazing to watch how quickly and with such economy they can get these major shots set up and pulled off. And people running around the jungle with a steady cam. They are not running on boards. It’s dirt and mud. We had a couple days where it was very rainy and there was just mud everywhere. It’s so humid. I was there at relatively decent conditions given the time of the year. But it was 85 ““ 90 degrees and very humid and you got the bugs in the jungle. There were days I came off the set with many mosquito bites and I learned very quickly to take the bug spray when they offer it to you.

    (Laughs)

    But it was kind of fun. It feels very genuine as an actor. You are out in that. It’s not a sound stage with a bunch of plastic trees. You are in the jungle. It’s really exciting that way. But, it’s not a show for the faint of heart. There’s not always a trailer right next to where you are shooting but it makes it kind of fun. I always felt bad about complaining about anything because I’ve watched the show and know the things they have been through and this is nothing.

    CS: I am amazed when I read an interview when someone from Lost says they are always trying to ply them for information about what’s coming next ““ to the extent that everyone dodges the question. It makes me feel uncomfortable, must make you feel uncomfortable. But, as the series now trends toward the end, do you feel, now that there is an end in sight, that we can expect more of the same of what we’ve been given this season?

    LANGE: Oh yeah. My sense of it as it gets from this the new episode forward would be the variable forward the last episode Some Like it Hot was relatively, some themes in there, but it was relatively lighthearted for an episode of Lost. I think it’s partly because from here on out it ups the ante all the time. It becomes a great roller coaster ride. I think that the rest of the episodes to come and the finale should be some stupendous television. It really is quite an action packed end of season from this point forward.

    CS: Having already taped the finale, when you reflect on it, how do you see your time on the program itself and what it’s done for you professionally and as an actor?

    LANGE: My time on the program? I can’t say anything other than it was a dream job. It really was. To be on a show that you are already a big fan of and to have it go as well as it did for me ““ great challenge as an actor and befriend the people that work on that set ““ it was just nothing short of spectacular for me. And professionally, it really is amazing the difference between working on one level of show (and I won’t name names) and then working on Lost.

    When my third episode aired, and I hadn’t really heard anything on the street and I went out over the weekend there must have been 10 different people that came up to me and said, “Are you Radzinsky? Lost is a great show.” So out of the blue people are starting to come up to me and things like that. It’s just a testament to the audience and kind of impact that show has.

    You never know where your career is going to go or what opportunities are going to come to you or not but it certainly in terms of it’s stature I think it’s the biggest thing I’ve been a part of. I hope it does great things for my career, obviously but I’m already getting a sense that it is a bit bigger than you in some ways.

    CS: I have to imagine ““ I know everyone talks about acting ““ “It’s just a job…It’s just something I do” – do you get some sort of thrill when you get recognized for being on the show?

    LANGE: Yeah. I went to some art fair this guy walked by me and just yelled, “Radzinsky!” Like that’s my name, you know? And I turned around and said “Yeah?” and he said “I’m such a fan of the show” and he was with a friend and they introduced themselves and just the nicest people. Coming from theatre you do a role, you do a show and you get instant audience feedback. You get applause, you get laughter, you get validation that what you did meant something to somebody. But on television you never really get that. It just airs and who knows what anyone really thought of it. So it’s always nice to have people come up to you and say, “Hey, I dig the show” or “Dig what you’re doing.”

    It’s just confirmation that you are on the right path in some way. It feels good that whatever it is you do makes somebody a little happier than they were before, I guess to put it simply. So yes, it’s a great feeling.

  • Trailer Park: X-MEN ORIGINS: WOLVERINE World Premiere and ADVENTURES OF POWER – Reviewed

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    So, I was able to sit down for a couple of years and pump out a book. It’s got little to do with movies.Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

    And now, you can follow me on Twitter under the name: Stipp. Some weeks you get lucky with the kind of information that people are talking about.

    ADVENTURES OF POWER – REVIEW

    aop_webThe moment that solidifies THE ADVENTURES OF POWER as a film that is far more than just a movie about a guy, Power, who has dreams of being a great air drummer is when Michael McKean, who plays his father, stands up to a pack of riot police. His father heads a pro-union force looking to hold the line for union workers who toil at a local copper mine; they walk off the job, force its obnoxious, caricature of a boss hoss to shut the normal mining operations down as McKean tries to elevate the working lives of those who live in a tough and shattered city that almost could be classified under Ghost Town categorization by New Mexico standards.

    It’s hard to believe that this movie actually is an amusing farce of a film but it is.

    Led by the air drumming talents of actor, writer and director Ari Gold as Power himself the movie has two things on its mind: 1) Tell a story about a man who dreams of being so much more than the incompetent miner that everyone else pegs him to be. 2) Take a shot at films where events cumulate in any kind of great event where our hero needs to become the winner of it all.

    Knowing these two things, the film is free to spread its thoughts across a wide palette of events that take Power from the destitute city where many dreams have no doubt died. But not Powers’. The film’s opening with Mr. Mister’s “Kyrie” sets the tone for the rest of the film in that we’re exposed to a lot of classic music where the focus is on songs with rich drum sound. What’s funny, or duly noted, about this is that not only does this movie bring together sounds from the past which let drummers express their presence in a band but the story is shaped by the music that I remember meant something more than some of what’s being made today. Power is that man, trapped in the years far in the past, trying to bring together his passion for being his own individual and trying to make those around him respect his abilities as a superior air drummer.

    The premise is absolutely ludicrous, it should be said, but Powers’ walkabout that finds him first in an underground air drum contest far away from his home and then under the tutelage of a former master of funk, Carlos, played by Steven Williams. What transpires in the hollows of Newark, New Jersey is a fantastical tale of a man who is taught how to become an even greater air drummer within a cast of absolutely bizarre band mates who air drum themselves. The mere transcribing of their efforts baffles even me why it’s funny to watch and take in but a lot of that credit should go to writer/director Ari Gold. His talent for writing a story that’s funny is one thing but you could virtually watch this film without the sound on and soak in the deliciousness of his direction. The cinematography only adds another layer to what makes this film special; it’s far too beautiful for how simple the story is but it couches the events of this film in a place that feels absolutely real. It’s not like an over lit comedic showpiece that is made specifically to accent the performances of the talent on the screen, this movie makes the places inform its action.

    Dallas Houston, played by Entourage’s Adrian Grenier, is also a wild card into this mix of craziness. Playing a overly hackneyed version of a superstar that is, himself, a walking caricature of arrogance we see that Houston also has dreams of being a great air drummer, a sinister behavior that he must keep hidden from his copper mine owning father (how coincidental!) but that’s the idea. The movie sends up films where these tropes exist but ADVENTURES OF POWER gets it right. It knows where to put the musical interlude during our hero’s training and it even knows every hero needs a lady to fight for. Segue to Power falling in love and wooing a deaf girl (played by the adorable Shoshannah Stern) and you have yourself the other piece to this cinematic puzzle.

    Even though the events that lead up to ending and resolution of the film is as predictable as the movies it lampoons the real treat is experiencing the potential in Ari Gold’s filmmaking. His previous effort in the short, short CULTURE have proven him to be sharp, thoughtful and quick to understand the patterns that exist in modern cinema and this film is no different. The satire here is sure to be lost on those who don’t see through the superficiality of what makes this movie such a small gem in the land of independent film which seems cluttered with films looking to spread heady and heavy messages. Ari Gold’s vision is fully realized in a movie that blends place and theme, and a wicked ass soundtrack, wonderfully.

    X-MEN ORIGINS: WOLVERINE – PREMIERE IN TEMPE, AZ

    premiere1There isn’t a whole helluva lot that follows which is mine.

    An Internet contest that was vying for the World Premiere of X-MEN ORIGINS: WOLVERINE got underway weeks ago. Hugh Jackman had a pre-recorded video message that asked fans from all over America to try and get the star studded event, he mentioned bringing a whole cadre of his actor buddies with him to help celebrate, in their town.

    I, being of sound mind and not giving in to such ploys to generate market interest in the movies, didn’t vote. Of all the places, who would want to bring a movie premiere to my backyard, to Arizona?

    signAll of mo-fo’s did, apparently.

    The masses spoke and thanks to this being a lead story in broadcast and online news (yeah, not much was happening that day) on the last day of voting Tempe, Arizona pulled out a win. Hugh again delievered a taped message a week ago last Monday to regale people with the good news. Again it was reported on as if Jesus Christ himself was about to appear at the local Dairy Queen.

    Days leading up to the event only meant more hoopla, more mentions of the fact that the last premiere to come to Arizona was BEN HUR, decades ago, and even the day of, this Monday, lines stretched around the theater the night before to try and get tickets or to at least jockey for a good position to see Hugh Jackman and company up close and personal. Hugh did the crowd a solid and sent muffins and coffee for the die hards in the wee hours on Monday morning, spending $4,300 on breakfast items for the crowd.

    premiere2Me? I was giving alms to my press pass and just making sure I had my batteries charged.

    What was to follow later that day, that night was pretty neat even from all the years I’ve spent covering events at places like the Comic-Con. The level of intensity from the crowd who were simply happy to be there, to see Jackman working the event like the emcee he’s so good at being, was inspiring simply because these were people who don’t work in the movie field and are just happy to indulge in a little superficality for an evening. It was good to reinvigorate myself to see how much people dig these sorts of things. Even though there’s no way in hell there will ever be another premiere in Arizona for quite some time it was still nice to talk to Wil i Am, Taylor Kitsch, Lynn Collins, Liev Schreiber and Hugh Jackman. I even got to have a very pleasant talk with Wolf from American Gladiators which was a surprisingly interesting and warm exchange.

    Not all the questions below I was able to ask personally. I take minimal responsibility for some of the more innane inquiries, especially the ones asked to Hugh, so I hope you enjoy the rapid fire pace of what follows.

    WOLVERINE Interview Questions and Answers

    LIEV SCHREIBER

    liev

    LIEV: That’s me.The bad guy from Scream. And I am Naomi Watt’s baby daddy.

    QUESTION:How are the kiddies?

    LIEV: They’re good. They’re good. They’re at home.

    QUESTION [Christ, I don’t know what I did to get saddled with these people]:What do you look for in a woman?If Namoi would say have at it.

    LIEV:I don’t believe I could answer that question in good conscience.

    QUESTION:Here’s an easy question.When you watch a movie are you a popcorn or candy kind of guy?

    LIEV:It depends on what they got. But, generally, I’m a popcorn kind of guy. If the movie is good, you never make it past one handful.

    [Want to know why some actors hate junkets? Wait for what comes next.] QUESTION: Is Hugh Jackman everything we think he is?

    LIEV: He’s awesome. Hugh’s pretty good. Ryan Reynolds said it best. He said Hugh is so nice he makes ice cream look like Hitler.

    (Laughs)

    STIPP: You have a strong theater background.What kind of movie does this represent to you when you look at the jobs you’re going to take? Do you make a difference between theatre and big budget action pictures?

    LIEV: The plain simple fact is that I don’t think men mature past the age of 22. Physically we can become 90, 100, 120 but mentally most men don’t go past 22 so when they say to you do you want to come to the movie and be the giant mutant cat that flys around the buildings and whips Hugh’s ass, I said yes.

    STIPP: There’s no hesitation?

    LIEV: No, there’s no hesitation. I don’t think there’s any hesitate for any man in that situation. Wouldn’t you do it?

    STIPP:Of course.

    LYNN COLLINS

    lynncollinsQUESTION: What’s something interesting that our fans would want to know about? [Journalists, asking the hard hitting questions!]

    COLLINS: What’s interesting to me is that one day Hugh came to me and said that the producers had gotten together and said that I needed to be wearing an outfit that may be more skimpy. So I walk into my trailer and there is the tiniest little silver dress I had ever seen in my life. So I put it on and went outside and they all said April Fool’s. It was a big joke. So I was standing there in front of the producers and Hugh Jackman in the tiniest dress that didn’t fit me.

    QUESTION:Sounds like fun. [Sounds like mental retardation…]

    COLLINS: That was fun. Humility. Humility baby.

    STIPP: As a theatre actress, and I’ve read about how you and Liev already have worked before in that capacity, this is obviously something bigger than you have ever experienced before.

    COLLINS: Right.

    STIPP:How was it going from theatre to big budget action movie?How does that translate for your performance?

    COLLINS: You know, I found it very interesting when I was working on this process that I was really able to utilize all my experience and training at Juliard because we are dealing with such sweeping emotions because we are working on stages with a green screen.

    QUESTION: How was it working with Hugh?

    COLLINS:He was the charismatic leader on this film. Everyone worked so hard and he was really the catalyst and shared that energy with all of us.

    TAYLOR KITSCH

    taylorTAYLOR KITSCH: Hey, how are ya?

    QUESTION:Welcome to Tempe.

    KITSCH:Thanks for having me. It’s a pleasure to be a part of it all.

    QUESTION:Is this your first visit to Tempe?

    KITSCH: It is. I have driven through but actually my first time to take it in.

    QUESTION:Where’s home for you?

    KITSCH:Austin, Texas.

    STIPP:What’s it like to take a comic book character to screen.You have those internet geeks who love to rip apart everyone saying, “He’s not right, he’s not good, he’s not…whatever.” How did you approach this character?

    KITSCH: The only way is you have to dive into it man. It’s all or nothing. You have to just commit to it 150%. So from learning the tools he has to the cars, to his accent, to his posture, to his cadence, to everything else, that’s how you do it.

    STIPP:Did you get to the point where you just say, “What the hell?This is a comic book.What am I doing?”

    KITSCH: No. Because the more I dived into him the more passionate I became, the more I understood the fans. I want to go another round with him at least. To go darker.

    STIPP:Really?

    KITSCH: Absolutely.

    STIPP:You said you wanted to introduce him.Where is the Gambit we get in this movie?

    KITSCH: You get a few pieces of him. He loves to fight and play around. You have to remember who he is against. Who Wolverine is to him at the time is a lot different than if you had Gambit earlier on which is something I would love to explore. How did he get to the point where he’s at his own poker table and he has that smirk. What made him have that, you know? I think a lot of that would be fun to explore.

    WILL I AM

    willQUESTION: How are you doing?

    i AM:I’m 21 and older.

    QUESTION:Hey, for all the brothers and sisters out there, what should they know about this film?

    i AM: It’s a brother super hero, you know… You know what I’m saying? Obama’s in the White House, first Black super hero…

    (Laughs)

    Nah. It’s a great film.

    QUESTION: What’s the biggest challenge you had doing this film?

    i AM: It’s my first movie ever so that’s a challenge. Dealing with professionals. Look at that poster. Check that shit out!

    STIPP: Are you thinking of hanging one in your house?

    i AM: No. That looks weird to me. I can deal with Black Eyed Peas”¦that’s normal but this is not normal.

    STIPP:Does this represent something to you now, like this is where you always wanted to be, a multi-talented artist?

    i AM: It makes me say, WOW. What I can do and what anybody is capable of doing. It’s not what you want because a lot of times you don’t dream it. You’re afraid of getting your world crushed. So that represents dreaming because you can be it. To any youth out there, to any kid, it’s like look at me. You can do it. Three years ago I never thought that was possible. To me, it’s a little kid in the projects or a girl that’s going through a lot, you can make it happen. Just dream big. Anything is possible. White, brothers, Chinese, Korean”¦anybody. You can do it man. I am freaking out looking at that poster.

    QUESTION:What’s going to be next for you? Any more movies?

    i AM: No. Next I’m going to release the Alicia Keys album and get back to what I am a pro at “¦. And I’m not a pro even at that because Herbie Hancock is a pro.

    STIPP: If you’re not a pro then what are you?

    i AM: I’m a fan that has equipment. At the end of the day, really that’s what it is. I’m a fan, I’m bored and I entertain myself. And people like it.

    HUGH JACKMAN

    hugh

    Hugh started off things by talking about his most generous gift of caffeine and pastries that morning to those waiting to get in to see the premiere.

    HUGH JACKMAN: Were you here this morning?

    QUESTION:No, but the fans were.

    JACKMAN: Oh yeah. My pleasure.

    Boy, when I rang Arianna at the bakery. I didn’t even know what the bakery’s called, but I think there was a 10 second pause when I said, “This is Hugh Jackman and I need 800 muffins and 800 cups of coffee.”

    It went quiet.

    “Is this a joke?”

    (Laughs)

    QUESTION:How are you liking Tempe?

    JACKMAN: I’m loving it. What a way to come here too. The time of year and the fans are insane. I love that. That’s how these fans are. I’m telling you, I’ve been living with this character and these fans for maybe 9 years and that’s why I wanted to show it to them first.

    QUESTION: And Hugh, everyone wants to know how did you get your arms in this kind of shape?

    JACKMAN: As a producer I should have gotten a little more money from the visual effects budget but I didn’t. I just went to the gym and did it the old fashioned way.

  • Trailer Park: X-MEN ORIGINS: WOLVERINE – Reviewed

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    So, I was able to sit down for a couple of years and pump out a book. It’s got little to do with movies.Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

    And now, you can follow me on Twitter under the name: Stipp. Some weeks you get lucky with the kind of information that people are talking about.

    X-MEN ORIGINS: WOLVERINE – REVIEWED

    x_men_origins_wolverineI don’t need to see this film again, nor do I have the need to ever own it.

    When I was 13 I had a friend by the name of Brandon Murphy. He was the only one who I knew was into comics and is responsible for sending sparks into the tinder that would flame into a full-on passion for The X-Men, Spider-Man and other titles that would create the base for my love of this medium.

    One month, while casually flipping through a copy of the most recent Comics Journal at my local comic book store they had a section in the back that was dedicated to talking about the cinematic developments of comic properties. Seemingly, a lot of what has finally made it to the big screen (SPIDER-MAN, X-MEN, FANTASTIC FOUR) had its genesis in a paper publication back in 1989. It would be ridiculous to think that these films were trapped in development for damn near two decades but the facts are both SPIDER-MAN and X-MEN went on to become box office juggernauts which laid waste to anyone thinking these films would only appeal to children. The early iteration of these films were a little rough as the filmmakers felt in the dark about how to translate comics to screen in a way that would be faithful to the source but be marketable enough to wide audiences so there were creative liberties taken; Rogue skewed younger, the Green Goblin was physically different and The Hulk had to contend with Hulk Dogs.

    Profits swelled, studios took notice and now we’re having to contend with a litany of comic book to film adaptations, reboots and spin-offs. Thanks to the success of the movies that had to believe that taking the material seriously would actually work we now have X-MEN ORIGINS: WOLVERINE. Based on the character who was the most obvious choice to get his own film WOLVERINE takes place long before he finds himself with the X-MEN and introduces a rogues gallery of fan favorites: Deadpool, Blob, Sabertooth and Gambit. The film wants to establish Wolverine as a character, wants to delve into how he received his adamantium and tries desperately to entertain while doing it. If this was Gambit’s game he would say 2 out 3 ain’t bad but here, for this film, it’s a losing hand.

    The issues that hobble this production are apparent from the beginning when we’re introduced to young Logan and his bone claws. In what has to be one of the most rushed “twist” story details, and there are enough of them here to think that M. Night Shyamalan, not David Benioff and Skip Woods, should get story credit, we have the worst use of “I’m your dad” in an awkward moment that sets the shoddy tone for what is to come. From the shoehorning of Logan’s classic comic book refrain of “I’m the best there is at what I do, and what I do isn’t very nice” into a conversation that feels awkward when uttered out loud the movie stumbles as the script feels like disparate moments strung together by a thin thread of relevance which, ultimately, prove not to be the case. The events that transpire could have all happened without the aid of the excuses that heretofore are called co-stars. If you could keep a tally on the ways in which any number of the co-stars, excluding Sabertooth, help the movie you would only need to use one hand. This is frustrating as any writer actually pushing pen to paper should recognize that you have to have a reason to include someone in a story but what seems to be the case in WOLVERINE is that these characters act as excuses to divulge wildly far-fetched bits of information.

    Further, an examination of what comes next illustrates the other contentious point that could go either way for someone watching the film: the flimsiness of the movie’s production.

    We go from boyhood to modern time with Logan all grown up and sharing a plane with the host of characters that will come and go like stage props for the rest of the movie. Ryan Reynolds absolutely shines as the merc with a mouth, Deadpool, and if there’s anyone who you wish they had more of in this movie it’s him. Liev Schreiber starts his run as the wickedly casted Sabertooth, and who deserves a lot of credit for elevating the tension, suspense and mood of this film, and doesn’t disappoint for the duration of the movie. The team’s leader William Stryker, played by Danny Huston, also is delightfully cast as the one man who no one should trust in a foxhole. The rest of the characters are forgettable, disposable and are completely irrelevant to the movie’s forward movement and act as convenient placeholders, like an opportune coaster to place a wet drink upon, to simply use and discard when not needed. The opening battle sequence has everyone showing off their talent, one by one, in an overly orchestrated battle that looks like it was taking place on a poorly disguised, and photographed, set; it’s plasticine flimsiness here just sets the tone for the other sets that look like sets. From the fight that takes place after our heroes board an elevator, to the jungle scene prior to Logan jettisoning from this merry band of mutants, to the fight that takes place between Gambit, Logan and Sabertooth, to a host of other special effect moments that simply look false there is a surprising lack of quality control. Never minding the accoutrements to the action on the screen the lack of character development for those on the periphery adds to the disappointment.

    The script for the film seemed to be at odds with wanting to tell an origin story, hence the title, but also having a fun movie to watch. I don’t think these things are mutually exclusive but the movie covers so much ground you don’t ever have a chance to breathe and that’s not a good thing. We barely get to know Logan’s lady Silver Fox, we have an even less chance to understand Dominic Monaghan’s Bolt, John Wraith barely has an opportunity to flex his muscle, don’t get me started on the stopwatch lifespan of the husband and wife who hurriedly nurse Logan back to health after he gets his metal, we get The Blob for one token scene and Gambit is all but ignored. There are literally a cast of characters interfering with a movie that should have been about Wolverine but instead we have X-MEN 4, a new team with a different leader. Even though this film is a vast improvement over X-MEN 3 it only does so because of the strength of Hugh Jackman and Schreiber.

    Jackman is the bright light in all of this as he pours himself into this role. He believes he is Logan, that he is Wolverine. And he’s damn right for thinking so. The mannerisms of what this human animal is supposed to be like are all evident in his rage when he escapes his captors as Weapon X, when he’s fighting for his life in the denouement of this film. Jackman has the charisma to pull this whole character off without a hitch but, the problem is, there isn’t anything else for him to do with what he’s given.

    With a gimpy script, wretched effects, questionable photography and a host of other distracting elements it’s not hard to make a case as to why this should be the only entry in this series, that any more films will turn a once hardcore outlaw of comics into a parody of himself, better suited inside the Sunday funnies. One time will be more than enough to take in what’s presented but I do hope the resulting avalanche of money that will no doubt be in this movie’s future will help begin discussions about how to focus on what was right about this film and excise everything else that did not.

  • Trailer Park: 500 DAYS OF SUMMER – Reviewed

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    So, I was able to sit down for a couple of years and pump out a book. It’s got little to do with movies.Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

    And now, you can follow me on Twitter under the name: Stipp. Some weeks you get lucky with the kind of information that people are talking about. This week there were clones galore, a conversation about Obama’s politics between webmasters broke out and the Twitterverse continues to write in agony at Alex Billington’s existence.

    CAPRICA DVD GIVEAWAY

    caprica_dvd-372x500Who here loves Battlestar Galactica? Now, who wants something to take the edge off the series’ abscence from television?

    Here then is CAPRICA.

    Taken from Wikipedia:

    Caprica is a television series set in the fictional Battlestar Galactica universe. Beginning 58 years before the events seen in Battlestar Galactica, Caprica tells the story of how Colonial humanity first created the robotic Cybernetic Lifeform Nodes or Cylons, who would later plot to destroy human civilization in retaliation for their enslavement.

    An extended version of the pilot premiered exclusively on DVD and digital download on April 21, 2009. In early 2010, the first season, composed of the two-hour pilot and 18 hour-long episodes, is expected to begin airing on Sci Fi Channel in the United States. The rights to broadcast the series have also been picked up by Sky1 in the UK and Ireland.

    Universal Studios Home Entertainment has graciously given me, well, lots of copies of this fascinating and pretty wicked program. Part film, part pilot this is actually a piece of Sci-Fi that was at once engrossing and entertaining.

    If you’d lke to take the next step in Battlestar’s evolution just drop me a line at Christopher_Stipp@Yahoo.com and let me know if you want one. Knowing how ravenous some of you viewers are about BSG I have a feeling they may go pretty quick…

    SAVE FERRIS CHUCK

    chuckvsfootlong-300x212Zach Levi and Josh Gomez are friends of this site.

    I’ve talked to Zach more times than anyone else I’ve met since working here and I’m glad to be able and say that he’s, by far and away, one of the most deserving men working in showbusiness today.

    Chuck has shown him to be a quick comedic actor who is able to blend goofiness with an action bent without any problems at all. He’s funny and it shows in this program. Teamed up with Gomez the two of them have a chemistry that the writers of this program have blended well together.

    The cast is top shelf, the shows have always been solid entries into television’s prime time offerings insofar that they show you can be mainstream without yielding to blandness but they have had heart. You haven’t heard any kind of needless drama or people not getting along and, in fact, last year I was invited by Zach to hang at the Hard Rock with the cast after their presentation at Comic-Con. Unless they wanted to put on a show to someone who has zero pull in spreading any kind of rumor whatsoever, you would’ve thought this was a Sunday night dinner with family.

    That’s why I wanted to post a little something to help the program out. Called Finale and Footlong Campaign it is an effort to help stave off any effort to cancel the show. I would hate to think this is an exercise in futility but since Check out this site here on Zach’s personal website to find out more information about how you can help possibly, maybe save the program from an early, and unfortunate, demise.

    500 DAYS OF SUMMER – EARLY REVIEW

    500daysposterBoy meets girl. Boy falls in love. Girl doesn’t.

    This post modern love story is never what we expect it to be — it’s thorny yet exhilarating, funny and sad, a twisted journey of highs and lows that doesn’t quite go where we think it will. When Tom, a hapless greeting card copywriter and hopeless romantic, is blindsided after his girlfriend Summer dumps him, he shifts back and forth through various periods of their 500 days “together” to try to figure out where things went wrong. His reflections ultimately lead him to finally rediscover his true passions in life.

    I know it’s little more than hyperbole on my part but this is going to be a film you’re going to be talking about in effusive praise as the film breaks wide.

    What separates this film from a lot of other less interesting takes on the nature of relationships that men and women find themselves falling into and out of is its originality. It’s difficult to mine a topic that has been done so many ways since time immemorial but what makes 500 DAYS OF SUMMER so precious is that they’ve found a way to do it again and do it in a pastiche of pleasure and pain.

    In wanting to tell a story that doesn’t drip with the falsities of what happens between two people who come together this film goes beyond the tropes and trappings of less than fulfilling romantic narratives which usually end in perfectly predictable ways. Writers Scott Neustadter and Michael H. Weber have written a story that doesn’t try to be too dour, too deep or emotive. Rather, what they do manage to craft, and why this movie sticks to the ribs of your heart long after you realize what the narrator said in the beginning is true, is a story that tells what it’s like to really fall in love and have it fall apart. Such a simple premise, and I realize that in other hands this could have been yet another film in a long string of sub-par romance tales, but it’s the non sequential storytelling that at least primes the pump for an engaging movie experience.

    After we’ve established that the story is not going to flow in normal order, some of the thrill is not knowing which in the 500 days you’re going to get next, almost like a visual Choose Your Own Adventure novella, we are beautifully ballasted by the school boy charms of Joseph Gordon-Levitt who simply plays a man named Tom and the girl-you-always-wished-lived-next-door in Zooey Deschanel as Summer. These two are matched up in a way that at once feels right and exciting; you can actually buy into the idea that this budding hipster could actually woo a woman of Zooey’s pedigree. She’s not portrayed as a woman who’s playing hard to get but, and this is absolutely where you have to praise the talents of the writers, she’s a woman who is independent and played as such throughout the movie. There is no abandoning the sense of who Summer is as a woman simply because she gets with a man like Tom. You want to think that everyone is able to cast aside their childish things once love walks into their lives, and certainly Tom does, but Summer stays constant and, I would posit, only heightens the searing pain of what happens when Tom’s devotion, dedication and dreams aren’t enough to make a whole.

    Gordon-Levitt hasn’t been this arresting since his turn in THE LOOKOUT, his portrayal as Tom is alarmingly resonant to anyone who has loved so hard but ends up having nothing to show for it. Tom’s eventual meltdown in a staff meeting is particularly poignant as even though it’s played for dramatic effect and is obviously going for the overtly overwrought, despondent aspects of a man in a slight depression it’s psychologically telling as something that any human being who can’t make sense of their own emotional lives could relate to. As well, Gordon-Levitt, once he does get back on his emotional feet and has brushed off his shoulders a bit delivers a subtle, yet stinging, turn as Summer comes back into his life in a wedding sequence that kicks any man in the spiritual nut sack when you realize he’s still hanging on to “What if” instead of realizing it’s “What already was.”

    Deschanel, for her part, mystifies. She’s a tough mistress in that she never gives us what we all want from her and that’s for Summer to realize that Tom loves her, that it should be enough for her to believe in but that there is more going on than any of us realize. Like it was mentioned, she’s her own woman but that only increases her attractiveness. She doesn’t fall into the usual trappings of young lovers or infatuation or any of the feelings that always befall her cinematic equals. We love her in this film because she is still herself, is gorgeously depicted as a woman who has a bedroom smile that you wish you could awake to, a demeanor that won’t allow stupidity but who ultimately will make you work for her affection.

    The truly arresting moments come in the film’s quieter times. When Tom picks a fight with a guy who is obnoxiously coming on to Summer, and it’s a time when you can see the writers at work crafting a moment for a specific reason, that it doesn’t feel organic, the ultimate resolution of the fight between Summer and Tom is gorgeously shot and is bathed in the kind of silence that apologies without recriminations sometimes have.

    On the opposite end of the heady and heavy you have Paul, McKenzie and Rachel. Played by Matthew Gray Gubler, Geoffrey Arend and Chloe Moretz, respectively, they represent Tom’s two closest friends in the film and Tom’s very young sister to whom he tells everything. These three represent the comedic relief in the film and while they do feel like they’re serving the story’s purpose of lightening the mood they are by no means wasted. Gubler is absolutely charming as Tom’s confidant, Arend is positively hilarious and wish I had followed that man’s love trajectory and Moretz is the film’s other female element and she plays it well, her youth is in stark contrast to the maturity the writers have imbued her with but it’s positively welcomed. Along these comedic lines there is a song and dance number by Hall and Oats that should absolutely become your go-to mental representation should you ever hear the ditty outside of the theater.

    And that’s the other thing.

    Kudos to the film’s director, Marc Webb, for choosing a soundtrack that isn’t a bunch of shoegazing emo idiots slapped together for the sake of molding a hipster mix tape. A song by the aforementioned Hall and Oats, a karaoke version of “Here Comes Your Man” by the Pixies from a wicked Gordon-Levitt who knows how to rock a mic and scads of other musical nuances round out an ephemeral environment that feels very real to those in this film. Webb deftly allows these two to become more than just prototypical constructs and those who want to take issue with the idea that we’ve been here, we’ve done that so many times miss the point that if you were to look at what people have been given as a cinematic representation of love in all its trappings and pitfalls we have not been given a movie that makes you understand why we’re all willing to do it all over again. And again.

    This is a film that deserves the slow resonating buzz its been getting and without question deserves your support when it comes out on July 17th.

    RAY SCHILLACI GOES TO THE MOVIES

    Highlights from the 9th Annual PFF

    phoenix_film_festivalFor those of you not in the know, PFF stands for Phoenix Film Festival, the largest film festival in the state of Arizona. It might very well be one of the friendliest in the nation for true independent filmmakers. This is the buzz that was going around the eight-day event amongst auteur young and old. A professional and friendly (from both staff and film folk) atmosphere abounded. There was more of a sense of camaraderie than of competition. Encouragement and goodwill spilled over into the audiences as well.

    Not that every entry was a gem. There were a few diamonds-in-the-rough along with some coal, one just wanted to toss away (depending on your taste). There was the occasional offbeat and oft putting, but for the most part the festival offered a great escape from the pabulum served up by the major studios, and the pseudo-independents that are actually backdoor funded by the same perpetrators.

    This brings me to a filmmaker favorite that graced the festival and was greeted with roaring acceptance and applause, Paul Osborne’s, “Official Rejection”. This documentary plays out as entertaining as the best of Michael Moore and then some. Osborne takes us on the treacherous and comical journey of several true independent filmmakers who enter the real world of the film festival circuit. The disappointments, the funds wasted, the lack of professionalism and the festivals that are mere “poser” independents for major studios is met with dismay.

    Independent filmmaker, Scott Storm, is the center of all this and it’s amazing that the man does not end up punching somebody’s lights out. Osborne’s camera does justice for the new mavericks of media, making us want to cry foul. They pour their heart and soul into something only to have it discarded by money-grubbing schemers who have no intention on lending a friendly hand to help distribute the good word on an indie film. Storm knows from previous audience viewings that he has something worthy (later acclaimed indie thriller, “Ten “˜Til Noon”) and as the rejection letters mount one can’t help wonder if it is all for naught. Tales of payola abound as do festival shenanigans that have staff not only get accepted but win awards as well!

    Storm plays the common man/filmmaker well. His story gets under our skin and makes us want to cheer for him. He’s our Mr. Smith, but instead of going to Washington, he’s traveling around the country with a micro budget siding with other frustrated filmmakers. After an exhaustive and heartbreaking trek, the man finally runs into some luck with our very own Phoenix Film Festival. It actually becomes a breath of fresh air. But what ensues between other festivals suddenly vying for the same film with the same schedule is an eye-opener. It’s amazing the moral fortitude Storm provides us with his journey.

    Although director, Storm is the main focus, there are other noteworthy players; a real stand out is director, Johnny Montana. His off-the-cuff comments and blazon over-the-top personality elicits big laughs and one ends up wanting to see more of him. Another funny turn is director Osborne’s blatant pull for celebrities to pepper the documentary just for the purpose of getting them in the credits to draw box office attention no matter how short the interview is. Some of the more entertaining interviews are, Kevin Smith (would we expect anything less), Lloyd Kaufman (founder of Troma) and Andy Dick. A host of other notables are available and they round out the procession with an in-depth look into what has gone wrong with the system. Even Traci Lords (former pornstar and B-movie queen) puts in a few words; just cause she’s Traci Lords.

    In the end Osborne and company have developed a unique double-edged sword piece of filmmaking that is rather ballsy. It’s beautifully executed and begging never to see the light of day, because it’s not only biting the hand that feeds it ““ it’s chomping down and devouring the appendage while shitting it out and laughing. As good as it is, it did not get accepted into Sundance, Slamdance or Tribeca. They were not even given the benefit of a rejection letter. Instead, phone calls were issued out and some had taken offense. Does the truth hurt that much? Obviously, yes! One only wishes that Osborne had gone a step further and pulled a Michael Moore by visiting Redford regarding his precious Sundance. But even without that, Osborne has accomplished a clear vindication to anyone who has spent their soul trying to get recognized for their passion. Personally, I would like to send kudos to Paul Osborne and company for a triumph of the will that has true independents rejoicing over their frustrated voices being discovered.

    There is much more to come. The documentaries really shined this year and a few left field surprises had people talking for days. Also, I have to mention the wonderful creative opening sequence for the festival. A wink and a nod to Frank Miller’s “The Spirit” with Camerahead leaping the rooftops to get to the festival while featuring the sponsors in comic book frames. The presentation was a sheer delight. I will return with reviews on two highly noteworthy documentaries, “The Way We Get By” and “Shooting Beauty”. Also a peek at the surprise hit at PFF among others.

  • 10 Quick Questions: Neko Case

    10quickquestions.jpg

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    So, I was able to sit down for a couple of years and pump out a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

    And now, you can follow me on Twitter under the name: Stipp. Some weeks you get lucky with the kind of information that people are talking about. This week a debate about whether video games are art and the new trailer for MOON created some waves.

    Hey kids, before we get to the interview with Neko Case, and it absolutely is the highlight of my year, I had to mention my appearance on the latest ScreenGeeks podcast wherein I talk about Fox’s issues with piracy. I absolutely love those guys over there so please run, don’t walk, to hear me blather on. If that doesn’t convince you then knowing I am only on for a little bit and then leave should convince you to check it out. Enjoy.

    [display_podcast]

    —————

    middleThe music industry is dying a slow and protracted death. Note well that I am obviously not indicting the artists who are scraping by as their corporate overlords are wondering what ingenious scheme can wrest away more money from an audience that seems to be under the delusion that the $9.99 they’ve just spent at Best Buy for the latest Young Jeezy album is making its way back to young Jeez. What’s more is that their death is being expedited like a nurse smothering a patient looking to die by suffocation by the digital realm; one that has been relentless with its Wild West set of rules and laws. From free downloads, illegal downloads, RIAA lawsuits, digital distribution, FTP sharing services and an array of boneheaded moves by those in power to keep its power it’s a wonder this hasn’t happened faster.

    From music industry promises to lower CD costs, to broken buisness models that simply do not work in the 21st century I welcome its demise.

    Artists have proven that you don’t necessarily need big time distributors to help get their music out there, simply look at the new paths being blazed by Nine Inch Nails’ Trent Reznor or Radiohead where a pay-what-you-want model seems to be taking root, but it’s the lazy and corpulent management of these labels that continue to try and play the game as it has always been played.

    And that’s where Neko Case comes in.

    A musician who has consistently proven herself as a versatile artist in crafting a sound with her 7 releases that you can’t label as anything but her own, Neko plays well with others; her stints in the band The New Pornographers has more than established her prowess as an individual who can either demonstratively make her presence known in a track like “Mood To Burn Bridges” from her 2000 release Furnace Room Lullaby or richly blended in a catchier than catchy song like “Spanish Techo” from The New Pornographers’ release Twin Cinema. Neko’s latest album Middle Cyclone is everything that her previous efforts have proven her so adept at doing: mixing emotion, steady hooks and grabbing you the very first moment you play a song like “This Tornado Loves You” or the title track “People Got A Lot of Nerve.” It’s the latter’s ability to make you want to see her play this song live that, in part, makes her a dynamic songstress. She makes you believe in the restorative power of music and strengthens my resolve that great music shouldn’t have to be this obsequious, opaque experience where you have to play a record more than a few times to “get it.” There isn’t anything wrong with that, just play Wilco’s Yankee Hotel Foxtrot to someone for their first time and dare them not say something about its density, but Neko makes me want to elevate so many other of her peers who just don’t get it. This is absolutely one of the best albums released this year, she is now on tour throughout the US and I thought that having her answer a few questions in support of the album would be a nice way to expose all of you to all of her.

    At about this time the convergence of record company and artist drove a wedge between getting this done.

    I pride myself, at the very least, as someone who will go after a story when I think there’s something there. I’ll call, e-mail, voice mail, anything I can to get a response of “yay” or “nay.” Lots of times, loads of times, it’s a “nay.” Just this week I was given the Heisman when I tried to angle some time with the members of Spinal Tap who are now out in support of their acoustic Unwigged and Unplugged tour. I can respect that, however flimsy a response like “Right now their sched won’t permit” is. What made this request so unique is that it perfectly crystallizes the issue with dealing with PR flunkies who are above such niceties as returning an e-mail inquiry or phone call. Over at ANTI-Records, the label putting out Middle Cyclone, the situation was just inflamed by the shitheads over at ANTI where “real artists creating great records on their own terms” is a mantra who either feel a) that I am insignificant enough not to respond to, which I completely can understand b) above returning a call or e-mail in which case I hope this makes a woman like Hilary Villa, part of ANTI’s crack publicity team, feel special/mighty c) like they can be a pack of rude twats out of perceived entitlement. All valid reasons I tell you! I’ll be the first to admit that I am not very big, not very influential at all and not very invested in the music business. However, what I am, though, is a fan of music who has a small outlet with a small voice where once a week I can choose to help get the word out about something I think people should take a minute to digest. I have the e-mails and logged calls to back my story, I can map it out on an Etch-A-Sketch and prove my work if needed, but when you flat out can’t be bothered to communicate back with another human being it still gets under my skin all these years later doing this job.

    So, rather than just forgetting the story I thought I would post the 10 questions I was going to ask Neko had her PR representatives not been a pack of troublesome assholes needing a little public flogging; those you choose to align yourself with are sometimes a reflection of you no matter how much you want to make the argument that one doesn’t have anything to do with another.

    Again, though, buy Middle Cyclone and support one of the better talents working out there in music today. Better yet, knowing how much ANTI is skimming from the top of every CD sale I think it would be just as well to instruct to you to go out, get a ticket, see her live and buy some of her merch. At least that way the bastards at ANTI “real artists creating great records on their own terms” can go suck it…You pack of chuckleheads.

    CHRISTOPHER STIPP: Neko, thanks for making the time to talk to me. You’re obviously busy so I hope to keep this brief. You good for time?

    NEKO CASE:

    CS: Good…So, I was wondering as I saw you during some of your recording sessions why you look to record some of your music in unconventional locales? I am speaking here of the barn you spent some time in.

    CASE:

    CS: I am not very up with the trappings of Tucson. Mostly, living here in Phoenix, I see it as an even more dusty backwater than its larger cousin. What do you find Arizona does to the creative juices? Mostly I find it just drains mine…

    CASE:

    CS: In this age of digital distribution I have to think that there is some lure to ditching conventional channels in favor of one that you could directly benefit from. Do you see yourself being tied to a label in 3 years, 5 years? Or, are they a necessary evil, with an emphasis on evil, in order for you to do best?

    CASE:

    CS: Some boys get into rock and roll so they can get laid. There doesn’t seem to be a function for it other than that with some of the kids out there trying to rock a mic. What made you think, or inspired you, to pick up a gee-tar and try to move some people?

    CASE:

    CS: This album isn’t a departure for you. I am thoroughly sick of hearing interviews with artists who feel the need to have a soundbite somewhere in the promotion process to say why their new album is unlike anything I’ve heard from them. You are content, and are excellent at, simply refining your sound and not changing much. Do you agree that you aren’t out to rediscover yourself, sonically, with every album?

    CASE:

    CS: With a track like “This Tornado Loves You” there is a lot swirling around in the harmony and in the lyrics. Do you find a song comes to you lyrically first and then a melody presents itself or does there seem to be a pattern with your writing?

    CASE:

    CS: Performing live. One of the things I enjoy when going to a show is how unique the artist can get with their songs. It doesn’t always happen but, for instance, Wilco will give you a little bit of a jam within a song that normally only lasts 3-4 minutes long. Do you like this sort of noodling, as it were, when you’re playing the same set again and again?

    CASE:

    CS: The track selection process. When you record your album the way you think you want it done is there a batting order of some kind that you come up with so that even though you have these songs that are quite unique there is some flow?

    CASE:

    CS: As you look towards where you’re going as an artist is it really just as easy to say “I just want to have fun” or is there some definitive point you want to reach in your career that might represent the ultimate moment which crystallizes why you got started with music in the first place?

    CASE:

    CS: Thank you, kindly, for your time today…

  • Trailer Park: Amber Borycki

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    So, I was able to sit down for a couple of years and pump out a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

    And now, you can follow me on Twitter under the name: Stipp. Some weeks you get lucky with the kind of information that people are talking about. This week a debate about whether video games are art and the new trailer for MOON created some waves.

    sop_field_300x250Quick announcement for those readers living in Phoenix (surprisingly, there are a lot of you out there) there is a screening of Kevin MacDonald’s (ONE DAY IN SEPTEMBER, THE LAST KING OF SCOTLAND) solidly casted film, STATE OF PLAY. The movie boasts the talents of Russell Crowe, Ben Affleck, Jason Bateman, Rachel McAdams, Helen Mirren and Robin Wright Penn so at the very least it’ll be pretty to look at.

    The sneak screening is this Tuesday night, April 14th at Tempe Marketplace. Those interested know the drill. E-mail me at Christopher_Stipp@Yahoo.com and I’ll make it happen.

    The film’s synopsis:

    Handsome, unflappable U.S. Congressman Stephen Collins is the future of his political party: an honorable appointee who serves as the chairman of a committee overseeing defense spending. All eyes are upon the rising star to be his party’s contender for the upcoming presidential race. Until his research assistant/mistress is brutally murdered and buried secrets come tumbling out.

    D.C. reporter Cal McAffrey has the dubious fortune of both an old friendship with Collins and a ruthless editor, Cameron, who has assigned him to investigate. As he and partner Della try to uncover the killer’s identity, McCaffrey steps into a cover-up that threatens to shake the nation’s power structures. And in a town of spin-doctors and wealthy politicos, he will discover one truth: when billions are at stake, no one’s integrity, love or life is ever safe.

    sin_nombre-posterfinAs well, I’ve got a screening for SIN NOMBRE this week for Arizona dwellers.

    The film, which is just a phenomenal debut from filmmaker Cary Fukunaga, is testament to the brilliance of those who are just looking for a change to tell the stories they believe in.

    SIN NOMBRE is playing this Thursday, April 16 at 7 pm at the Harkins Camelview in Scottsdale, Arizona. E-mail me to get on the list…

    Sin Nombre is an epic dramatic thriller written and directed by Student Academy Award winner Cary Joji Fukunaga in his feature debut. The filmmaker’s firsthand experiences with Central American immigrants seeking the promise of the U.S. form the basis of the Spanish-language movie.

    Sin Nombre tells the story of Sayra (Paulina Gaitan), a teenager living in Honduras, and hungering for a brighter future. A reunion with her long-estranged father gives Sayra her only real option ““ emigrating with her father and her uncle into Mexico and then the United States, where her father now has a new family.

    Meanwhile, Casper, a.k.a. Willy (Edgar Flores), is a teenager living in Tapachula, Mexico, and facing an uncertain future. A member of the Mara Salvatrucha gang brotherhood, he has just brought to the Mara a new recruit, 12-year-old Smiley (Kristyan Ferrer), who undergoes a rough initiation.

    While Smiley quickly takes to gang life, Casper tries to protect his relationship with girlfriend Martha Marlene (Diana García), keeping their love a secret from the Mara. But when Martha encounters Tapachula’s Mara leader Lil’ Mago (Tenoch Huerta Mejía), she is brutally taken from Casper forever.

    Sayra and her relatives manage to cross over into Mexico. There, they join other immigrants waiting at the Tapachula train yards. When a States-bound freight train arrives one night, they successfully rush to board ““ riding atop it, rather than in the cars ““ as does Lil’ Mago, who has commandeered Casper and Smiley along to rob immigrants.

    When day breaks, Lil’ Mago makes his move and Casper in turn makes a fateful decision. Casper must now navigate the psychological gauntlet of his violent existence and the physical one of the unforgiving Mara, but Sayra bravely allies herself with him as the train journeys through the Mexican countryside towards the hope of new lives.

    I also have 2 DVD giveaways: THE MINDSCAPE OF ALAN MOORE and A GALAXY FAR FAR AWAY – 10TH ANNIVERSARY SPECIAL EDITION

    alanAlan Moore writer, artist and performer is the world’s most critically acclaimed and widely admired creator of comic books and graphic novels. In The Mindscape of Alan Moore we see a portrait of the artist as contemporary shaman, someone with the power to transform consciousness by means of manipulating language, symbols and images. The film leads the audience through Moore’s world with the writer himself as guide, beginning with his childhood background, following the evolution of his career as he transformed the comics medium, through to his immersion in a magical worldview where science, spirituality and society are part of the same universe.

    What I can tell you about watching this documentary is that is Alan Moore very much encapsulates independent thinking and raises it to an art form. Regardless of this stances on the metaphysical or the ephemeral Alan is able to distill some very complex thought patterns into cohesive narratives that at once entertain and mind bend.

    The documentary frames this writer as the master of his own donat, his own language. He is no ordinary writer, to be sure, and this documentary wonderfully dovetails with the WATCHMEN film in that here is a film that at once explains the why’s and how’s and then goes on to wrap your brain around the mysticism of Alan’s thought patterns. There are some more than excellent interviews with those he’s collaborated with and this documentary will more than satiate anyone wanting to know more about the man who has, in popular media, only been known as the guy who didn’t want his name attached to the film adaptations of his work.

    I have a few to give away and if you’re interested please stick the words “Alan Moore” in the subject line of an e-mail and shoot it over to me at Christopher_Stipp@Yahoo.com

    star-warsFeaturing interviews with hundreds of fans, movie executives, and high profile celebrities, A GALAXY FAR FAR AWAY delves into the franchise that has made household names of Luke Skywalker, Han Solo, R2-D2 and C3PO. As a new wave of Star Wars mania was being induced in “˜99, Jalal brought his cameras to Star Wars conventions, to boisterous nationwide premieres, into the homes of devoted fans showing off their treasures and collectibles and captured those who spent 42 days on line, just to be first to see The Phantom Menace.

    Interviews and archival footage featured includes Samuel L. Jackson, Joe Pesci, genre filmmaker Roger Corman, Meat Loaf, Dennis Franz, Andy Garcia, Jimmy Kimmel and Star Wars alumnus David Proust (Darth Vader), Kenny Baker (R2-D2), Anthony Daniels (C3-PO) and Peter Mayhew (Chewbacca). Offering a complete, often hilarious, exploration of George Lucas’ crowning achievement that brings together a group of fascinating, passionate, hysterical — and often touching ““ fans, A GALAXY FAR FAR AWAY is not just a film about overzealous fanboys.

    Instead, it plumbs the depths of a common, shared love that knows no boundaries and seeks answers to a stunning phenomenon that continues to live on like Yoda.

    I love documentaries like this. There is something about the examination of any subculture where I’ve had a passing interest. To wit, TREKKIES has set the bar for me in regards of simplicity and its lo-fi sheen. In the middle of this average documentary I not only came to understand why some will dress up and descend on conventions simply to indulge their passion as fans of this science fiction program. The interviews always draw me in, I cannot start this film without going all the way through and I suspect the same will happen for this documentary. It hits the notes it has to with its exploitation of the crazies who are genuinely into this but it also has some solid interviews with those who have inside the sphere, first-hand knowledge of the universe that George Lucas has crafted. Say what you will about the man but he has parted a lot of people with their money. This documentary absolutely shows where a lot of that cash has gone.

    I’ve got a few copies available to give away so if you’re interested please put “Galaxy” in the subject line and shoot me a note at Christopher_Stipp@Yahoo.com.

    ———————————————–

    HARPER’S ISLAND: AMBER BORYCKI

    harpersSometimes it’s just good to sit on something.

    I waited to release this interview with Amber Borycki of CBS’ Harper’s Island, now showing every Thursday night (and watch the show’s premiere online if you’ve missed it), as I’ve done this before. I’ve talked to a show’s talent and released the thing weeks before the show has even aired. Most of the time it’s a safe bet but if you’ve never heard of a program or watched it there is an inherent problem at times in making it meaningful to someone who hasn’t seen it.

    With Harper’s Island, though, I hedged a bet that it was going to well in order to have a little more than a passing interest in the following interview. But the bet wasn’t that risky in my own estimation. You had an excellent time slot that was poised to help this little show that could, you had a cast full of unknowns that only increases the tension for a murder mystery program in that you can’t cherry pick who is going to make it to the end but, most of all, and what impresses me, is that this show has a finite lifespan. I am just as a fan of Lost’s twisted and arching story lines but there is something fascinating in a program’s development that says to itself, “There will be someone dead at the beginning and there will be a resolution of it all by the end of 13 episodes.” If all goes well, there could be a different set-up for each batch of shows. Yes, it’s gimmicky in a way. However, where the rubber meets the proverbial road is whether the story and writing can sustain itself for these episodes; you could have any number of wacky premises but if each one was written well enough I could care less about how nutty the idea is.

    As it stands, and why I feel vindicated if only for a week, the debut of Harper’s Island last Thursday ranked first in viewers for its time slot (10.5 million) behind only stalwarts CSI and Survivor. Take it as you will in this fickle viewing pool of television viewers but I’ll strike while the iron is hot and introduce you to Amber Borycki, an actress who had her film debut in a breakout performance in 1984’s RUNAWAY by Michael Crichton starring Tom Selleck , Kirstie Alley and Gene Simmons of Kiss only to disappear for almost 20 years.

    Read on to find out why…

    HARPER’S ISLAND is on Thursday nights at 10 ET/PT

    amber-borycki-79401-89CHRISTOPHER STIPP: Tell me, what is it about this show ““ it’s one of those shows that has been shrouded in mystery with only a vague idea of what it’s about. What can you tell me?

    AMBER BORYCKI: Let’s see. There’s a lot I can’t tell you about the show. We are sworn to secrecy to our death actually. Do you want the premise of the show?

    CS: Briefly. Lay it out for me.

    BORYCKI: It is a one hour drama. They are calling it a horror-inspired drama or a 13 episode mystery event. Basically it’s about a group of friends and family and they travel to an island to celebrate a wedding and for Abby Mills who is the lead character played by Elaine Cassidy this is the first time she’s gone back to Harper’s Island since her mother was murdered there 7 years ago.

    I guess at the beginning spirits are really high and it’s all a big party but as the show progresses people are gripped by fear and are murdered one by one and everybody is a suspect. By the end of 13 episodes, the murdered will be revealed.

    CS: And this is one of the interesting things I found out about the show is that they are planning on spinning this into ““ if this season goes well, next season will be a completely different cast with a completely focus.

    BORYCKI: Yeah, they have to. There’s nobody left.

    (Laughs)

    CS: But, yeah, they are planning on making this more than just a one time thing.

    BORYCKI: Yes, that is the one thing we are allowed to say is that they are promoting it as everybody is going to go, one by one people are going to be picked off and by the end you will sort of find out who it is. I mean, pretty much everybody.

    CS: This seem right for a couple reasons. Why I like this is that they know there is a finite, definite end to the series. Can you shed some light about what they had in mind? You can see how this could have been stretched into 3, 4 or 5 seasons. Why did they want to shoot it all in one season and get it done with?

    BORYCKI: I think it’s just because it’s a new idea. The reason they are doing just 13 episodes is because they are calling this a mystery event. They are promoting it as kind of a mini-series. So, that way you are guaranteed, I think by July 13th, you are going to know who it is. That way, people who are watching the show ““ they have this anticipation every time. They know they are going to find something out.

    I think that’s the difference between a series like Lost. You don’t know when you’re going to find out the end. This way, you know the exact day you are going to get that reward for watching the series. It’s really like a horror movie stretched out over 13 episodes on TV. Like a really long horror movie ““ which is pretty cool.

    amberCS: Are they shooting this cinema-style or doing it kind of vérité like a documentary?

    BORYCKI: It’s actually done cinema-style. Like any other one hour drama. There is no hand held camera. It’s great, shiny and colorful. That’s one cool thing about the show is that it starts off in the beginning in the summer and it’s the wedding, it’s the parties, the heels, bright colors and sun but as the show progresses, the whole tone starts to change when people start getting killed and obviously if your friend or family member gets murdered you are not going to be putting on your heels and dresses anymore. Dressing in darker colors and jeans and the whole tone starts to change. A very cool visual effect ““ the palate changes as well.

    CS: Is that what brought you into this? Was it the premise that sold you, did someone have you in mind or is this one of those things you basically go in for and audition and see if you get it?

    BORYCKI: I auditioned, yeah. I auditioned for a show here in Vancouver, Canada where the show is filmed and I actually only auditioned a week before the show went to camera. They were still doing casting and it all happened super fast. I went in and Jon Turtletaub, our executive producer, Dan and Karim were there in the room and, right away, I knew walking in that I wanted to be a part of the show because of the energy in the room. They were warm, inviting and such great guys and were excited and it was a cool experience auditioning because they were so welcoming. I left saying I really wanted to work with these guys because they were so great. So, I’m really happy to be a part of it.

    CS: Speaking about Jon, I read some interviews with him. He’s an interesting guy to get on-board with something like this. Serial television isn’t something he gets a whole lot of involved in.

    BORYCKI: True. National Treasure fame and all.

    CS: Exactly. Can you share what brought him to do this thing? He said he was going to do National Treasure III.

    BORYCKI: That maybe a question you would have to ask him. I don’t really know exactly how he got involved in the first place. I just know that it was a collaboration of people that really wanted to try something new. Something that has never been done this way before. Yeah, it was kind of different. We were all really excited to work with him. Him coming into a TV series. He directed the pilot as well, which was great because we all got to hang out. To have him there with his film background and history really just worked for the show because it feels like a movie on TV. Like a 13 part movie. But in terms of how he got involved initially, I’m not sure.

    CS: Let me ask you a little bit about yourself. From 1984 until about 2003 you were basically absent from major productions but were doing a lot of theater. What brought you back in?

    BORYCKI: You must have looked at my resume!

    (Laughs)

    CS: Yes, I did….

    BORYCKI: The Runaway is on there and it makes me laugh because I did movie when I was a year old. It starred Tom Selleck and he actually rescued me from killer robots. It’s hilarious. Now we have all these cool I-Robot type movies and in this movie it looks like shoe boxes with guns sticking out.

    (Laughs)

    It’s all kind of funny. I’m in my crib and he comes in and rescues me. Magnum-style. I guess it was my parents. My dad is a writer and producer but I never did any child acting. I guess in high school started doing theater and musicals and came to acting that way and didn’t start doing TV and films until I was about 19. They left it up to me to find my own interest and it just sort of came back into my life and I realized that it was what I loved to do more than anything. That explain the “senior” hiatus?

    (Laughs)

    I took a little break. The Runaway took it all out of me!

    CS: Did the writers know ““ obviously one of the things about Lost ““ some of the guys didn’t really know where it was going to go when they got started, we just had the idea.

    BORYCKI: We asked them and yes, they knew. That was really funny because we would try to get it out of them all the time. There were people claiming that they were going to have mental breakdowns. I remember going out for dinner and one of our cast members was like, “Look, if you don’t tell me this… I can’t handle it anymore. I don’t know if I’m going to die. I don’t know if I’m the killer. I need to know this. I’m going nuts.” But it was like a game all the time. They did a really good job because nobody knew anything until the end. Top secret.

    CS: Well, what about for you? What’s on the horizon? What are you looking forward to?

    BORYCKI: I’m super excited right now because the show comes out in about a month and we have our billboards up, which is really cool. I’m in Vancouver right now but I’m heading down to LA tomorrow, actually, and the picture of our billboard has been circulating around and we’re sending it like on Facebook and emails. I love the websites where people are starting to talk about it. So, at this point I’m just super excited about the show and I’m going to head down to LA and be there for the pilot episode and we’re all going to get together and watch it. That’s the focus right now. I’m still auditioning for other things and thinking about what’s coming next but at this point, the focus is pretty much on that. There is some pretty cool press stuff coming up. They are doing a lot of extra stuff that goes along with the show. There’s the Harper’s Globe which is a website that CBS is doing which is kind of like a story of a girl, a local to Harper’s Island who writes for the paper and keeps a blog on what’s happening. Sort of an off-shoot of Harper’s Island. Things like that. Pretty cool stuff to watch out for.

    CS: That’s the frustrating thing about doing an interview like this because you can’t say a whole lot.

    BORYCKI: I know. I’m trying to be really careful. We had to sign our lives away to not say anything and it’s so hard. Even my best friends and family are asking me questions. My accountant the other day was asking. But I couldn’t say anything. I can only say what I can say. I don’t want to slip up.

  • Trailer Park: X-MEN ORIGINS: WOLVERINE – Reviewed

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    I’m awesome. I wrote a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

    And now, you can follow me on Twitter under the name: Stipp. Some weeks you get lucky with the kind of information that people are talking about. This week, though, was all about ShoWest and the plethora of crumbs that fell from Hollywood’s summer movie season table.

    X-MEN ORIGINS: WOLVERINE – Now Available in the iTunes store!

    watch-x-men-origins-wolverine-movie-poster-1So, stop me if you’ve heard this: on April Fool’s Day eve the word went out that a leaked version of Fox’s X-MEN ORIGINS: WOLVERINE had made its way to the Internet. Those who have been around these parts for a while have come to expect a bit of juvenelia from those in the online community be it in the form of fake stories, fake rumors, fake DVD releases (I still remember the one that mentioned the existence of a PEARL HARBOR preview on copies of THE ROCK) and basically stupid shit that still surprises me that webmasters everywhere think is amusing to perpetuate. However, that said, and like Sally Forth’s daughter wondering whether her mom would bite the ears off of her chocolate Easter bunny in the Sunday funnies, it always amused me to see what would come up next however lame or uninspired.

    This rumor, though, had a different tenor. Spread across Twitter, there was some urgency in the message that WOLVERINE had popped up on the Internet. First the screen shots appeared, the quality was incredible I have to admit, and then like a pack of people wondering if something was real or not “Has anyone heard whether this is legit?”, “This is a bad day for Fox”, “Someone is going to prison” the chatter was enough to make you wonder. Then, not succumbing to the peer pressure just yet, Ethan from Screen Geeks Radio took the plunge for all of us and gave a play by play of what he was seeing.

    It was real and it was DVD quality.

    For once the Internet got it right. It was a bad day for Fox and then the commentaries started from all the usual suspects across the film spectrum. Was it right to publicize this? Is this news? Is it a news story that, if someone ran, would just inspire people to download it more? How awful were the people who downloaded the film and did these people represent any considerable dent to the possible box office if it proliferated?

    It was the latter question that got me thinking about who ARE the kind of people that download these kinds of things and whether they did represent any threat to the overhaul haul this film would eventually bring in? The easiest answer is no. It’s not. No matter how many people download it, the bell curve of the people who are, right now, rabidly consuming the bits and bytes off torrent sites everywhere to see this unfinished film represent a subset of users who not only don’t mind watching an unfinished film but users who roll up to these sites looking for cam copies of I LOVE YOU, MAN or blurry versions of KNOWING.

    The difference between me and a lot of other movie site contributors is that I don’t have any animosity towards these people. Derision, hatred, abject disgust are just a few things those who are leaders of the bully pulpit of commentators are using to describe those downloading the film. Why? I can understand where they’re coming from, I understand their position but I don’t think I can empathize with their negativity. Now, keep in mind this is obviously my opinion, but when you are in a position of having it all, and many of those lucky enough to be writing about film for more than just yourself are enjoying this moment in their life when their comments and opinions matter, it’s easy to cast aspersions on those who would hazard to download this movie. I could list a few popular podcasts out there right now who are sometimes aided in their reviews of films that never quite made it to their part of the woods but using “special antennae” were able to get copies of LET THE RIGHT ONE IN, GOMORRAH, THE HURT LOCKER and countless others simply through a few mouse clicks. It doesn’t make the downloading better or right when someone is doing it for professional purposes but I can certainly understand where the temptation comes in to play.

    It’s the tastemakers who have access, who can pick up a phone and verify a rumor, can shoot off an e-mail and get things done, can go to places like the Comic-Con and get treated like the royalty they are not by the publicists looking for some favorable buzz, a favor or two when and if they need it. (Anyone want to take a stab at how many sites were “asked” to take down images from X movie or risk any modicum of power being dimmed like a dying bulb) There are no true outlaws on the Internet; only those willing to play quid pro quo.

    The issue here really has to come with why we seem to be a culture that is warp speeding towards free. Some people, not all, have an expectation of access to everything, at all times, without having to pay for it. Just ask how your local newspaper is doing with regard on how they’re doing on creating a fiscal model where the print paid product can be replaced with their online, free version. It’s not working well, I can you that. And it’s just this microcosm of anomie among media companies that illustrates why WOLVERINE being on the Internet not only represents the pain it’s causing the money men at Fox but it is also indicative of the issues surrounding of what happens when you have a current climate of those who can consume their media at no cost to themselves. This movie, if I were to go back to when I was 13 and screwing around with my man Brandon Murphy and we were dream casting the X-MEN if and when it would ever get made, would represent a temptation even greater than porn. Now think of what it represents to those who use the ‘net to get their music, their television shows (show of hands: who has used BitTorrent to download a show that has long since gone away or who wanted to use it to see an old episode of The Office?) and other uses that some would consider “awful”, “shameful” or any other word ending in “ful.”

    So, seriously, save your sanctimonious bullshit, your disdain for those who are downloading this film at a rather healthy clip and your upturned nose at those who you were many years ago when you had no one to listen to your empty praise of how awesome SCOTT PILGRIM is going to be or how awful 12 ROUNDS is because, I get it. I understand where the viewers are coming from and it’s the reason why your business model will never allow you to charge one fucking cent for your own content. The money won’t come rolling in, it’ll slowly trickle like a torrent file.

    Oh, yeah, almost forgot, the review. I have to admit it is hilarious to see Ryan Reynolds, in the middle of a great action sequence, polished , well choreographed and slick looking, doing a forward flip assisted by wires attached to his harness.

    If you want to know the rest you know where to find it.

    THE MIGHTY BOOSH

    mighty-boosh-coverWith that out of the way I wanted to give a shout out to a most strange but entrancing series that hit television this week: The Mighty Boosh.

    Now, the title may throw some people off but this show, honestly, is one of those unique visions of both creativity and complete insanity. I was falling ill with the flu earlier this week and I found it was just what my mind needed. I’ll allow the press release to put the program in context but do yourself a favor and schedule it in your TiVo and give it a chance. I’ve attached some sample clips to whet the proverbial appetite and to show you why it’s so hard to explain what this program is about without sounding like I’m on something.

    Eels:

    Trailer:

    THE MIGHTY BOOSH ARRIVES TO ITUNES

    Starting today, Season Three of the UK hit comedy series from award-winning creator-stars Noel Fielding and Julian Barratt, The Mighty Boosh, is now available on the iTunes Store in the U.S. (www.itunes.com), with the first episode offered at a discounted price of 99 cents.

    The Mighty Boosh joined the Adult Swim Sunday line-up this week, with episodes airing weekly at 1 a.m. (ET/PT). New episodes will be available on the iTunes Store each week following broadcast at www.itunes.com/tv/themightyboosh.

    The third season sees Vince Noir (Noel Fielding, IT Crowd) and Howard Moon (Julian Barratt, Nathan Barley) working in Naboo’s second hand shop in Dalston. Needless to say they don’t get much work done. This doesn’t bother Naboo too much, firstly as the shop is really only a cover for his shady interplanetary Shaman business and secondly, he’s usually quite chilled out from sampling his own magical herbs and remedies.

    With a massive cult following in the UK, Barratt and Fielding launched their first nationwide tour The Mighty Boosh Live across the U.K in 2006. Their second tour Boosh Live sold out venues at 90 stops across the U.K. and Ireland and wrapped up earlier this year.

  • Trailer Park: MONSTERS VS. ALIENS – REVIEW

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    I’m awesome. I wrote a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

    And now, you can follow me on Twitter under the name: Stipp. I’ve been finding that when you start to follow other people Alex Billington of First Showing.net and some other lightning rods of public opinion you got yourself an amusing petri dish of entertainment.

    FAST AND FURIOUS – Screening

    ff4_field_300x250Now, first things first: Is there any among you living in Arizona who believes in the redemptive power of empty action?

    Vin Diesel is back to the franchise that really launched him into the films that, well, set up his eventual arrival back to the franchise. Say what you will about THE FAST AND THE FURIOUS but it was a movie that was all parts action and no part brainpower. It’s one of those films that I still label as a guilty pleasure simply because I enjoy watching it. There isn’t anything redemptive about the story but there are really some excellent practical effects and it still holds up as the kind of movie you can enjoy if it just happens to pop up on cable.

    Now, though, the gang is back in Justin Lin’s FAST & FURIOUS, coming into theaters April 3rd and here is the synopsis:

    Vin Diesel and Paul Walker reteam for the ultimate chapter of the franchise built on speed – Fast & Furious. Heading back to the streets where it all began, they rejoin Michelle Rodriguez and Jordana Brewster to blast muscle, tuner and exotic cars across Los Angeles and floor through the Mexican desert in the new high-octane action-thriller.

    fastWhen a crime brings them back to L.A., fugitive ex-con Dom Toretto (Diesel) reignites his feud with agent Brian O’Conner (Walker). But as they are forced to confront a shared enemy, Dom and Brian must give in to an uncertain new trust if they hope to outmaneuver him. And from convoy heists to precision tunnel crawls across international lines, two men will find the best way to get revenge: push the limits of what’s possible behind the wheel.

    The screening is happening this Tuesday night, March 31st, at Tempe Marketplace and I only have a handful of tickets to give out. If you’re a winner I’ll put your name on the list and you’re as good as in. Just shoot me a note at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com.

    BOLT – Blu-Ray/DVD Combo Giveaway

    bolt1This is one of the most progressive things to happen in the home entertainment market. Say what you will about the battle between whether we’re all going digital or whether it’s better to stay safely in the DVD or Blu-Ray camp because Disney has just released last year’s BOLT, featuring the vocal stylings of John Travolta and Miley Cyrus, in handy Blu-Ray/DVD combo packs.

    You don’t have to guess which to get as you fiddle around guessing whether you’re going to be upgrading in the next year or whether you’ll be able to take a digital copy with you in your portable media player. This combo pack also sports a digital copy along with the two other formats so I cannot recommend this release enough.

    The film surprised me as I wasn’t really expecting much but I ended up genuinely enjoying this film and am happy to announce I am giving away 5 Blu-Ray/DVD combo packs to the first five people to shoot me a note at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com. I’ve also got tons of temporary tatoos, note pads, sticky pads and blow up toys so come one, come all.

    For those in the dark about BOLT here is your synopsis:

    For super-dog BOLT (voice of JOHN TRAVOLTA), every day is filled with adventure, danger and intrigue – at least until the cameras stop rolling. When the star of a hit TV show is accidentally shipped from his Hollywood soundstage to New York City, he begins his biggest adventure yet – a cross-country journey through the real world to get back to his owner and co-star, Penny (voice of MILEY CYRUS). Armed only with the delusions that all his amazing feats and powers are real, and the help of two unlikely traveling companions – a jaded, abandoned housecat named Mittens (voice of SUSIE ESSMAN) and a TV-obsessed hamster named Rhino (voice of MARK WALTON) – Bolt discovers he doesn’t need superpowers to be a hero. Directed by Disney veterans Chris Williams and Byron Howard, BOLT is a hilarious, fun-filled, action-packed animated comedy adventure in Disney Digital 3-D.

    BOLT is currently available in retail stores everywhere…

    THE EMPEROR HAS NO SOUL: MONSTERS VS. ALIENS – Review

    monsters-vs-aliens-posterGood, but not great. If you’re being honest and your crap detector is plugged in anyone watching the new film, MONSTERS VS. ALIENS, should have some kind of reaction along these lines.

    Before I launch into the review here’s the synopsis:

    When California girl Susan Murphy is unexpectedly clobbered by a meteor full of outer space gunk, she mysteriously grows to 49-feet-11-inches tall and is instantly labeled a “monster” named Ginormica. The military jumps into action, and she is captured and held in a secret government compound. The world learns that the military has been quietly rounding up other monsters over the years. This ragtag group consists of the brilliant but insect-headed Dr. Cockroach, Ph.D.; the macho half-ape, half-fish The Missing Link; the gelatinous and indestructible B.O.B.; and the 350-foot grub called Insectosaurus. Their confinement time is cut short however, when a mysterious alien robot lands on Earth and begins storming the country. As a last resort, under the guidance of General W.R. Monger (on a desperate order from The President), the motley crew of Monsters is called into action to combat the aliens and save the world from imminent destruction.

    Featuring the voice talent of Seth Rogen, Reese Witherspoon, Hugh Laurie, Will Arnett, Stephen Colbert and Keifer Sutherland this film so much wants to be so much more than it is and more than it delivers. I’m not sure where exactly the movie comes off the rails as an enjoyable narrative but there are moments in the film where you feel like entire segments of the film are missing; that’s a false notion as it is obvious this production thinks it’s able to move from traumatic moment of woman getting married, turning into large woman and then going into battle to fight a giant robot, then an alien horde, her fighting acumen sharply honed in the 3 minutes worth of transitions and exposition that fails to endear you to the 4 characters we’re supposed to care most about in this film. To illustrate the point, why do we care as an audience about Sully and Mike at the end of MONSTERS, INC.? It’s because we’re given enough moments throughout the film that show us that although they may look bizarre and completely abnormal the storytellers at Pixar paid attention to their humanity, or that immutable and ambiguous essence of what would make you and I feel something for them, so that at the end of the film when Sully says good-bye to Boo you’re positioned to feel something human for this wholly made up beast.

    MONSTERS VS. ALIENS does none of this.

    The film manages to completely skirt the issue of emotional development and, as a result, you have a movie that ends up just being good, missing the opportunity to create a new hybrid of superhero monsters that you not only want to see more of but would pay money to see. As it stands this movie employs the kind of 3-D showboating that we now make fun of in FRIDAY THE 13TH: PART 3 where the direction takes a back seat to using camera tricks to show you how neat-o it is to have objects flying towards your face. Don’t get me wrong, however, as the effects are genuinely a delight. You haven’t seen real 3-D until you’ve seen a crisp digital picture unencumbered by ill fitting red and blue glasses of yore tossing enough visually appealing objects towards your eyes. I believe the filmmakers have compensated enough so that those who find themselves in a 2-D theater won’t feel put out but it genuinely takes this humdrum story and launches it into another dimension. The effect is so convincing that at times your senses are tricked into thinking this world is all before you in real time. That’s amazing technology, to be sure, but the story suffers.

    We’re introduced to all the monsters shortly after Reese Witherspoon becomes the super woman that we will know as Ginormica but even though we’re rapidly introduced to Susan as a wee little human and then see her transform within the span of the first 15 minutes we’re still hurried through everyone’s back story, all well told with nods to classic sci-fi films, and there is nary an attempt to make these monsters more, well, like you and I. I wanted to appreciate B.O.B.’s eccentricities more than I did, Seth Rogan has found the outlet where his guttural laughter actually accentuates the character he’s playing, to feel some connection to Dr. Cockroach or even feel something other than neutrality for The Missing Link. In an effort to appease an ADD audience, it seems, who would be unwilling to stand still for more than a minute we are rushed through his story of a savage robot, laying siege to San Francisco. Some illogical progressions of the story and ample derring-do to give the kiddos something to gawk at aside this set piece framed the tone for the rest of the film.

    If you’re a fan of Stephen Colbert, his voice gives life to the part of an ineffectual but violence-embracing president of the United States, then you know what you’re getting. There’s nothing new here besides a genuinely humorous moment when the prez gets loose on a synthesizer in order to communicate with an alien ship and busts out “Axel F” as his sonata. His character, along with Kiefer Sutherland’s turn as the hard-ass military man who is in charge of the monsters, feels like someone we’ve already seen before, hackneyed even. Put these elements together and you’ve got yourself a briskly paced film that doesn’t require you to feel anything more than delight as the movie takes you on a visual feast (there are some moments when the visual palette is just bursting with detail) where the plot devices that bring us into the 3rd act just seem convient if not completely forced fed.

    Much more of the same pervades the eventual climax of the film where our fine heroes find themselves aboard a spaceship, faced with the pressing threat of world domination should they fail. And of course they do not fail, it’s the actions of the team other than Ginormica which become more interesting than she is, and we’re all treated to an ending full of treacle and possibility that Part 2 is going to be coming at you in a few years.

    The problems I have with this film were enough to land this movie in the “Good, but not great” category. This is, however, a film aimed at kids so my point here could be, well, pointless. Parents are always looking out for movies that appeal to their children and as this is the movie business, this investment, this commodity, for Dreamworks will absolutely bring them delicious dividends. As a movie that will be revered, be looked at with respect and awe, though, you can count on MONSTERS VS. ALIENS to be relevant in the moment and then be relegated to all the other films that will sit on a shelf, blurred out in time to other movies that have given the audience a little more than this did.

  • Trailer Park: The /Filmcast and KILLER AT LARGE

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    I’m awesome. I wrote a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

    And now, you can follow me on Twitter. Find me here, This week saw a burst of activity with regard to Comic-Con lodging and how dismal the Comic-Con hotel ordering system really is. Hopefully you’re one of those ones who got through. Myself, I’m staying at a hostel/hotel hybrid. Should be interesting if nothing else…

    For those who may not of found out about it one way or another, the esteemed human checkbook known around these parts as Kevin Smith was on the /Filmcast last week. Even if you are all burnt out on WATCHMEN you really do have to listen to this marathon podcast. David Chen, Peter Sciretta, Devindra Hardawar and Adam Quigley all do a great job with this show and it’s one of those things I like seeing drop into my iPod queue in any given week. This week was no exception but it really is fascinating to get a filmmaker’s perspective on things and it helped me to couch my own interpretation of the minutiae contained in this as well as delving into some of the particulars of the movie. Think of this as the perfect thing to listen to as you reconcile what you thought this could be versus what it actually was.

    [display_podcast]

    Secondly, I always like to promote those who were more than complimentary when I had the chance to interview them. Christian Oliver talked with me last for the hotly debated topic of “Is it good?”/”Is it crap?” for his turn in SPEED RACER so when I heard he had a new film coming out I just felt it polite to return the nicety.

    The film is called READY OR NOT and the film is described as follows:

    Four college buddies find themselves on the adventure of their lives, when on the morning after a Las Vegas bachelor party, they end up stranded deep in Mexico penniless, being chased, falling in love, and fighting to make it back across the border in time for the wedding.

    I can’t vouch for how mind-blowing it is but the man was genuinely nice and so it’s always a pleasure to simply be a human being and give a shout-out.

    —————–

    Ribwich.

    I loved eating ribwiches in high school. Along with a side order of sizzling fries, splayed out on a foam tray, chugging it all back with with a Barq’s root beer it was my version of a good lunch. I can’t tell you how vividly I remember the class I had after lunch, it was health, and consisently thinking about how sluggish and foul I felt after consuming these types of lunches day in and day out.

    It wasn’t until Freshman year in college when I knew I was headed for Portly Town, getting winded just by doing warm-up calisthenics, and did something about it. I picked up a book by Covert Bailey, called “Fit or Fat”, and made life altering choices that have been with me now for over 15 years. I don’t consider myself freakish about it but I do try and always make sensible choices (although get me around a pepperoni and bacon pizza and watch the glutton in me leap out) and have kept an eye on the news reports regarding obesity in America and whether we really are becoming the fattest country in the world.

    When I head about Steven Greenstreet’s documentary about the health and social issues facing our nation today with regard to our waistlines I couldn’t pass up the chance to talk to someone who might give me the inside line about how the battle of the bulge is going. From what he tell me, there isn’t really much to be proud of and a whole lot to be alarmed by.

    KILLER AT LARGE hits DVD on March 31st..

    CHRISTOPHER STIPP: How did this project come about?

    STEVEN GREENSTREET: It started about ten years ago. We met up with a doctor who specializes in obesity and he contacted us. He had seen our last film and said he had some new research on obesity and asked if we could make a short film for him. So we said sure and then got into some of the research and said holy crap this is an epic film. We just touched the tip of the iceberg. There was tons of stuff that needed to be covered. So we went back to him and said why don’t we re-establish the budget and make this a feature film and he got on board. That’s how it got started.

    CS: What kind of stories were you unearthing?

    GREENSTREET: One of the stories we read was how the It’s a Small World ride at Disneyland was shut down and had to be renovated because it was designed back in the 60’s when people were thinner and now people are so heavy that they were actually drowning the ride. They had to renovate it because of people’s weight. Locally, there was a huge theater that had to renovate its seats because the theater was built in the 70’s and people are just getting too big.

    And then, we got a hold of a video clip, and it took us forever to get a hold of this by the way, but the Surgeon General of the United States was giving a speech at the University of South Carolina where he literally says that obesity will dwarf 9/11 or any terrorist event you can play out to me. And we’re like, “Holy crap…” You can’t do a film about obesity without taking time. We realized it was a big problem. The problem with obesity is that it’s a complex problem and you just can’t point your finger at any one thing. You can’t say McDonald’s is the bad guy or junk food is the bad guy or the lobbyist in Washington is the bad guy. We used the statistics for global warming ““ obesity is leading to global warming in that we used 39 million extra gallons of fuel each year simply because we weigh more and that’s since the 1970’s.

    CS: Really?

    GREENSTREET: Yeah, 39 million extra gallons of fuel and it works in reverse. If every American just lost one pound we would save 39 million gallons of fuel.

    CS: What seemed to be the turning point in people’s knowledge that this is an issue? If we look back at the 20th century it wasn’t really an issue. What has happened that we are so attuned now to healthy eating ?

    GREENSTREET: Well, we actually went back further. We went back 4 million years to the dawn of man and interviewed some anthropologists about evolution ““ back in Cro-Magnon days ““ how our brains were wired – we used to be hunters and gatherers running around the plain hunting our food. And for the most part we didn’t eat meat or high calorie foods because it was so hard to get so we were eating fruits, eating brush, eating things like that.

    Every once in a while we would get a deer or an antelope or something like that and then we really had to run for dinner, essentially What has really happened in evolution is that we don’t have to run for our dinner any more. Nowadays, with technology and the luxuries that we have, we sit a lot and there is no movement being done. In fact with children in the No Child Left Behind Act which is one of the Bush administration’s significance to education it has upped the requirements for reading and arithmetic ““ schools are actually cutting out physical education. So kids are sitting on their rumps all day in school and then all night at home. So we actually interviewed teachers and superintendents about the effects of No Child Left Behind and literally we have a shot of this huge elementary school gymnasium that’s been converted into four classrooms. They don’t even use the gym anymore.

    CS: Lazy kids…

    GREENSTREET: So they could meet the requirements of the government. We interviewed experts about our toxic environment. Everywhere you go there are cues to make you eat. Car washes, the DMV, there is vending machines. I just edited into the film there’s a locally tire store called Swab Tires and they give away free beef. Come fix your tires and they give you slabs of beef. Back in the 60’s you go to a gas station and you just got gas. Now you get cookies, chips, soda. And vending machines at schools are totally off the charts. We interviewed kids that that’s all they eat for lunch. They put $5 in a vending machine. There is a school that is so under funded by the government that Pepsico moved in and said, “We will give you $50,000 ““ just sign this contract with us.”

    School lunches are nothing but surplus.

    If there is a surplus of butter, they put a lot of butter in the lunch, if there is a surplus of ground beef, they are going to eat a lot of hamburger. Here’s an interesting statistic ““ we spent more money feeding prisoners in the state of California than we do on school lunch on a national level. Per child.

    CS: I haven’t seen the movie but I go back to the trailer with the Surgeon General ““ how does the government factor into this problem? Are they aware of it or are they complicit in it or, like you said, you had a hard time trying to track down some information. How do they factor into this issue?

    GREENSTREET: You have to understand that by and large, money talks, money walks and in Washington, DC is bought and sold everyday and they are absolutely complicit. Let’s start with the Surgeon General ““ Dr. Vinichiy is supposed to inform the public about health crisis, health problems and stuff like that. While he was in office for the Bush administration, he wrote a document about the dangers of obesity. That document was not allowed to reach the public eye by the Bush administration. In turn it was given to a Bush insider, Wm. Steiger, George Bush Sr.’s godson, who edited it and any mention to eat less sugar, eat less, he edited that all out before it became public. And we got a hold of the before and after document (before it was edited).

    CS: That’s fascinating…

    GREENSTREET: Yeah, it was actually a very big news story. And then Carmona, before he left office he did a tell all and went on all the news stations and said that during his tenure with the Bush administration he was muzzled and was told to shut up on so many issues and obesity was one of them. Because big sugar lobbies, meat lobbies, etc., they buy and fund congressional and presidential elections and they didn’t want to tick their people off so they didn’t want anything in the document that says eat less sugar, eat less of this, any mention of eating less, because once you tell people to less of something you can tell them what to eat less of.

    One of the most infuriating and yet fascinatingly funny aspects of our film is about a year and a half ago, when Shrek III was coming out the government got together with DreamWorks Animation who was releasing the film and they released a PSA with this huge glutinous ogre on TV saying get up and play an hour a day get out and exercise at the same time his face was on the front of over 70 junk food products. Like from cereals to candies to Fruit Roll-Ups to soda and the government knew it. Even on Twinkies, with green filling it was absolutely disgusting and Shrek gets out there and it was free publicity for DreamWorks and the government, Secretary of Health claimed it was a huge victory for government. We’re going to get our kids to get up and play. Another thing is the food pyramid. The government threw away the old one at this big press conference and replaced it with no food just colored bars and completely confusing and no one knows what it means in fact if you go to the my pyramid website and put in your weight your age and sex they will tell you what to eat ““ what your diet should be. And no matter what age, sex or weight you are it will tell you to drink 3 cups of milk per day. That’s the dairy lobby. Buy our milk whether you are two years old or 86 and 300 lbs. Drink 3 glasses of milk a day. Here’s another thing: The USDA over 75% of the officials at the USDA are former food lobbyists ““ meat lobbyists, dairy lobbyists. So basically if you go to the upper echelon at the USDA for agriculture, people are actually on leave from their corporate jobs. And now USDA is regulating the rule about food. Basically a revolving door with corporate America.

    CS: How does this stack up against other countries? Are Americans genuinely the fattest people on earth?

    GREENSTREET: Yes. Statistically we are. Granted per capita countries such as Tonga and some Polynesian countries are more overweight but as a leading country the United States is the fattest in the world. But obesity is not just an American thing. Strangely it is popping up in Ethiopia. Obesity is being seen in places we haven’t seen before…

    CS: Didn’t we send money over there in 1984 for We Are The World to help feed them?

    GREENSTREET: Yes, exactly. The experts across the board says one of the reasons contributing to world-wide obesity is the importing of American food. American fast food culture ““ Japan, Europe, parts of South America. Here is something else that is infuriating is for some reason and it didn’t used to be this way, the poorest people in America, the people with the littlest money are the fattest. How did that come to be? You would think that if you were poor you wouldn’t have that much money for that much food to be glutinous. We set up our system that the foods with the most calories are the cheapest and the ones with the littlest calories are the most expensive. You take a $1 in the grocery store and can get 1200 calories for your dollar in the snack food, candy or soda aisle but you can get 200 calories of carrots for your dollar.

    CS: Why is that? It infuriates me because I try to eat healthy ““ I’m thin by comparison to a lot of people and it costs so much for me to make right choices and have salads but for half the price I could go to McDonald’s and have a huge bad-for-me meal. Anything you found out about why the inverse is the case?

    GREENSTREET: Yes, in the film we do a history lesson. Back in the 70’s the Nixon Department of Agriculture Secretary Earl Butts decided that farming will not be a mom and pop type of business but should be more of a corporate conglomerate and he told the farmers plant as much as you can of corn of soy and we’re going to put you in a world market. What’s happened is that we have created a surplus of corn and soy, an over abundance of it and hence it’s become extremely cheap. Corn is put in more than 75% of things you buy at the grocery store. That McDonald’s meal that you buy, it’s in the bun, it’s in the burger because it’s a corn-fed cow, it’s in the ketchup, it’s in the mustard, it’s in the French fries, in corn starch in the chicken nuggets and in the high-fructose corn syrup in the soda.

    So, one reason that fast food is so cheap is because they are using cheap surplussed corn. That’s one of the reasons that junk foods, all that stuff is so cheap. All that stuff has corn in it. Candy has corn in it. That’s one of the reasons we are growing so fast because as a species we are supposed to be eating 50 – 70 ingredients for nutrients for our bodies and now we are mainly eating 3 ““ 5. Corn and soy are the main products of that. The agriculture policy in this country is one of the reasons that cheap high calorie food is the way that it is. Because of the surplus. Corn production has sky rocketed and even now the corn production has increased every year ““ even though we don’t need it.

    CS: Where does it go? Does it go into everything and anything they can stick it in?

    GREENSTREET: Exactly. The film shows how so many ways the corn plant can break down the corn plants you can make starches and sugars out of it and you can process so many foods. Another very interesting statistic is that 40 or 50 years ago if you trace back the food’s energy source you’d go to the sun. it brings us to the cow that eats the grass and you eat the grass and the cow got it’s energy from the sun. Now”¦.you have to go back to the Persian Gulf. Because what’s happening because cows and livestock are not eating grass they are being fed fossil fuel derived corn. The follicle fuel comes from the gulf. Essentially we are sipping oil. That McDonald’s meal’s energy source you’d have to go back to the Middle East.

    CS: Hmm…

    GREENSTREET: Another thing, if you took a strand of hair and put it under a microscope, you would find corn in your DNA.

    CS: Really?

    GREENSTREET: Americans. For the most part if you are an American and eating an American diet, there is corn in your DNA.

    CS: Is it because we are eating so much of it, it is becoming a part of who we are?

    GREENSTREET: Literally the children of the corn!

    CS: What do you do now that you’ve spent time on it, what is your perception on how obesity has evolved?

    GREENSTREET: First and foremost, I had no idea how complex and deep rooted this problem was but at the same time when the film was over it makes sense to me that things are the way they are. One of the anthropologists we interviewed who has been studying the evolution of man for decades he says that I think that humanity is heading for an evolutionary disaster because we set up this system that goes against our biological makeup. We are eating foods that we are not supposed to be eating and too much of it. We are creating a world of luxury and convenience and we are not “hunters and gatherers” anymore. And it is really sucking up our biology. And we are not keeping up with it. When you look at it from outside the box it makes sense that things are the way they are.

    CS: Why don’t enough people care? Some people who are overweight are just sort of resigned to it. Some people care, some people take action, but we are not getting any thinner.

    GREENSTREET: it’s complicated for sure and personal responsibility plays a big part for sure. A lot of people when they see a fat person would say if you wanted to lose weight you probably could. But there a lot of different factors, it’s one thing to tell a parent, tell kids, like Shrek says, gets up and play an hour a day but to say we’re going to take phys-ed out of school and convert the gym to a classroom. Adults – we’re going to put you in a cubical and you crunch some numbers and you can do your work but then you go home and see your kids. When are you going to exercise? We have a solution section in our film – $72 billion dollars a year is spent on health insurance obesity related illnesses. It’s really a threat to our health system to our insurance system and employers are beginning to wake up.

    For instance, Sprint at their headquarters, they totally renovated their headquarters. They slowed down their elevators and updated their stair cases with beautiful vistas, sky lights and put signs on the staircases saying that if you walk this many stairs you will burn this many calories and in turn paying employees for every pound they lose. IBM, Astra Zeneca ““ there are companies around the nation that are realizing they are losing money. We gotta care about the health of our employees or we are going to lose money. And so they are actually taking steps during the day ““ we are giving you a half hour during the day to go exercise in the company gym and if you do that we will take $400 off your health insurance. So companies are starting to do that. And there is a lot of different things to do but I think the right people to help out are doing the wrong things, i.e., the government, the school system, companies themselves marketing to kids is astronomically off the charts.

    CS: Talk to me about that. I have a 4 year old and a 2 year old at home and we hardly keep the TV on and thank goodness for TiVo because we can blast through the commercials but when I do have to sit down and see these commercials I can’t imagine that the amount of money that is used to spend on kids has gone down in years, the opposite must be true. They must be doing hardcore marketing to get that younger demographic.

    GREENSTREET: Yes. $100 million is spent just on candy – marketing candy.

    And if you want a comparison, $10 million is spent to market breath mints and $1 million used to market fruits and vegetables in this nation. The statistics show that companies want cradle to grave loyalty from kids. They want to get them out of the cradle essentially. They have 7 Up and Pepsi bottle bottles ““ they look like a 7 Up bottle or Pepsi bottle. McDonald’s had a billboard that’s in our film a billboard that had a baby breastfeeding on a McDonald’s burger. And kids under the age of 8 cannot differentiate the difference between the commercial and the program so when Sponge Bob cuts to commercial, they don’t know it’s a commercial. They don’t know they are trying to be sold something. And they have a thing called the Nag Factor. Ralph Nader’s film actually says it in there that Madison Avenue when a new ad campaign comes out they actually rate it. This has a 50% Nag Factor, this has an 80% Nag Factor ““ getting kids to nag their parents.

    We have a Chuck E. Cheese commercial where the kids are having fun and then mom shows up and they say “Oh mom, why did you have to come?” And then she actually pulls her face off and it’s really Chuck E. Cheese and they say now we can have fun again. And there’s a McDonald’s commercial where they kids are doing homework and it’s raining and grey outside and classical music is playing and they are all bored but then Ronald McDonald shows up and the lights get all bright and he wisks them off to McDonalds and they start eating cheeseburgers and are happy. So they are getting the message that classical music is bad, being at home is bad, so they are getting these kids to nag their parents for what they are told is fun. So it’s really unfair and undermines parental authority. As a parent you have to choose your battles. Which battle are you going to pick if your 8 year old is dressing like a hooker? It’ll be the sexuality battle. So there is some movement, Senator Tom Harkin wants to eliminate marketing to kids under 8 but nothing of any significance.

    CS: Demographically speaking, is it easier to get the individuals in the lower economic strata that a middle class child or adult?

    GREENSTREET: Statistics show that kids or adults in poor communities are the fattest and most obese. They have a variety of problems but also if you go to poor communities some of these people don’t have cars. And where’s the closest place I can get fresh produce. It’s probably not a block away but there is a McDonald’s a block away, there’s a McDonald’s on every block or there’s a Wendy’s on every block. Or there’s a 7 Eleven where you can get a Grandma’s cookie. So the incentives in this country to feed our kids right are totally out of whack. There are no ““ the government is doing nothing to create incentives. You have to look at this evolutionarily ““ we’re screwing ourselves up and doing nothing to put the brakes on. Except in little sections of the nation people are starting to wake up.

    CS: What are people saying after you show them this finished film?

    GREENSTREET: 100% of the people are completely pissed off and say, “We had no idea.” People will email us and say “we have stopped drinking cola because of the corn” and it’s really getting people to wake up and be aware and how it’s all hurting our biology. The fat tax in Mississippi is not a solution.

    Poor people are relying on that 99 cent cheeseburger.

    We are just screwing the poor even more making it more expensive. I don’t think the idea is to ban McDonald’s or ban junk food but to show them something better and create incentives to get that. There is actually something going on today called upchuck rebellion. The next generation is refusing to eat crappy foods and is more focused on eating healthy and becoming more educated about their bodies and learning more about cooking. I certainly don’t agree with Morgan Spurlock or people like that that say McDonald’s is the bad guy ““ we just have to get rid of that and we’ll be fine.

    CS: Right. And, regarding the process of making a documentary, what are your thoughts about the medium itself? Did you ever think…”Maybe I’m getting too preachy here?” How did you keep that in check in the editing room?

    GREENSTREET: My first film, my first documentary I didn’t want it to be too preachy and I didn’t want it to be too biased. I didn’t want it to be like a war film. This is how it is. This is how it should be. This film is not narrated. It’s observational, it’s educational. And I’ve seen this film so many times and there is one part in the film right now that I’m struggling with because I think it comes across too vegan like propaganda. I’m a vegan but I eat meat.

    (I laugh)

    GREENSTREET: What’s that?

    CS: Nothing. I’m just laughing that you say you’re a vegan but that you are a meat eater.

    GREENSTREET: Yep, I can say that filmmakers probably have the worst diets ever. We put all our money into the film so we grab the fast food break between editing. But I don’t want the film to be one sided. We covered all aspects as best we could. It still could have been a 10 hour epic. But we tried to cover as many aspects as we could and stay in the middle if we could.

    CS: When you did your first cut, what did you have to do to pare it back or did you have any babies you had to leave on the cutting room floor?

    GREENSTREET: Our first cut was 3 hours long. Way too long. So anything that doesn’t 100% address obesity we had to cut. Like the 6 degrees of Kevin Bacon ““ things on the sidelines we had to cut out of the film. We had stuff about fertilizer ““ why does the orange look so orange? Why does the tomato look so red? So that it looks good on a shelf so you buy it but we trimmed all that and now it’s down to an hour and a half ““ literally cut it in half.

    CS: Now that you finished it, and have shown the final version to people that could be in the position to buy it, what has it taught you about the final stages of movie making and how to market and to see you film and get people interested in seeing your film?

    GREENSTREET: We have a good PR person and Oprah showed a clip last January 4th so we are out there. We’ve been in some newspapers and we’ve been interviewed but once our film gets sold it’s going to be full throttle. Calling on people to find out what their plan is to address the issues in the film. The activists are in the thousands that are involved in this issue. We’ll be calling on all of them to get the word out to call on their local leaders to see the film, and address the issues about what can be done. We have solutions in the film to see what others have done to solve the problem so it’s really grass roots stuff.

    CS: Did any candidate that is out there now that is in a position to vote on something is there anyone out there that has a so-called food policy?

    GREENSTREET: Bill Clinton is in the film. He had to undergo heart surgery and talked about how fast food and our kids are walking time bombs. He says that this may be the first generation that has a shorter life span than their parents because of obesity. So Clinton, for the last 7 or 8 years, along with Hillary, have been advocates very publicly. I know Mike Huckabee battled obesity and lost over 100 pounds so he’s an advocate for obesity problems. I haven’t heard anything besides general health care statements from Obama or any other candidates about the issue. But I would say if there was one politician nationwide tackled it like a lion is Senator Tom Harkin in Iowa. He’s all over it. He’s been changing eating vending in the schools, he’s updating nutrition policy at the USDA. He’s been a bull fighting this.

    CS: What does he say about the lobbyists and the opposition?

    GREENSTREET: He’s in the corn state so he’s fighting the junk food but fighting it the right way. He brings the story of children and he puts them up there on the Senate floor and how can you argue that. He did lose the 2007 farm bill for the USDA to update their school nutrition policy and it got completely shut down. Because the Republicans said it was too hard on the food industry. So there are wins and losses across the field.

    CS: Well, Steve I have just one more question for you. When this film finally makes it to the public what would you classify a win in your mind?

    GREENSTREET: A win?

    CS: What would you hopes happens?

    GREENSTREET: I think the best case scenario for me would be that people come away from the film knowing that this is a battle that we fight three times a day. It is the most democratic of wars. And the life blood of a democracy is our ability to be informed to make a change. I don’t want to shove anything down anyone’s throat or force a change but I want people to take a second look at the battle they are fighting with their food, their government, school, employers and take a second look. And think, if I just do one thing, if I put a gym in my work, put physical education back in our schools. I’m going to my kids school tomorrow and I’m going to see what my kids are eating. Getting people upset and getting them educated. I have no expectations for a final solution but a win would be for people to stand up and ask some questions.

  • Trailer Park: Trevor Moore, Zach Cregger and 2007’s Playboy Playmate of the Year, Sara Jean Underwood for MISS MARCH

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    I’m awesome. I wrote a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

    And now, you can follow me on Twitter. Find me here, my oh so original name on the thing is Stipp so come on and follow my stray ramblings. From standing in a pool of toilet water to talking about nothing of great importance you can ensure that I send out quality.

    Before we get started with the interview I thought I would begin with giving away some free stuff.

    In support of this week’s release of Universal’s ROLE MODELS on DVD I have five copies to send to anyone living and who can write me an e-mail to Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com. One entry per e-mail address (some of you really get into this and while I appreciate your enthusiasm I cannot let you think this is Publisher’s Clearing House so keep it to one) and, just to make things interesting, I have a first runner-up prize for a handful of hopefuls: an official ROLE MODELS bottle opener w/ custom blue LED flashlight built into it. What better way to show you can open a beer bottle and then navigate your way through a darkened beer garden than with this nifty piece of electronica.

    Good luck…

    Official Synposis:
    Paul Rudd and Seann William Scott star in Role Models as Danny and Wheeler, two salesmen who trash a company truck on an energy drink-fueled bender. Upon their arrest, the court gives them a choice: do hard time or spend 150 service hours with a mentorship program. After one day with the kids, however, jail doesn’t look half bad. Surrounded by annoying do-gooders, Danny struggles with his every neurotic impulse to guide Augie (Christopher Mintz-Plasse) through the trials of becoming a man. Unfortunately, the guy just dumped by his girlfriend (Elizabeth Banks) has only sarcasm to offer a bashful 16-year-old obsessed with medieval role play. Meanwhile, charming Wheeler tries to trade in an addiction to partying and women to assist a fifth-grader named Ronnie (Bobb’e J. Thompson) redirect his foul-mouthed ways. It would probably help if Ronnie’s new mentor wasn’t an overgrown adolescent whose idea of quality time includes keggers in Venice Beach. Once the center’s ex-con director (Jane Lynch) gives them an ultimatum, Danny and Wheeler are forced to tailor their brand of immature wisdom to their charges. And if they can just make it through probation without getting thrown in jail, the world’s worst role models will prove that, sometimes, it takes a village idiot to raise a child.
    ———————

    MISS MARCH INTERVIEW

    These three were a delight.

    One of the problems with seeing a movie before interviewing those who were in it is that sometimes, once in a great while, the film doesn’t live up to what either you or I would consider, in this case, a breakthrough of comedic proportions. That’s not to say the film doesn’t have its moments. However, I thought it best to stick to questions about Zach Cregger and Trevor Moore’s (WHITEST KIDS U’KNOW) triple threat of writing, directing and acting in their first feature film.

    They proved to be affable and quite open about the process of making the movie and when the interview starts with Zach giving Playboy Playmate Sara Jean Underwood shit for texting during a previous interview it was a good enough entry point for me.

    MISS MARCH opens everywhere today, March 13th.

    SARA JEAN UNDERWOOD: He called me out and said I was rude at one point, so…

    CHRISTOPHER STIPP: Really? Why did he say you were rude?

    ZACH CREGGER: Would you be offended if someone was texting while you were interviewing?

    CS: Well, it would make me feel bad on the inside.

    (Laughs)

    CS: I would never say it but…

    UNDERWOOD: So unprofessional! Thank you for calling me out. I will never do it again.

    CS: Texting when someone is interviewing you. That’s hardcore.

    (Laughs)

    UNDERWOOD: I was trying to be sure they had a booth tonight at the club. I was working.

    [I intentionally turn away from Sara]

    CS: So what I’m going to do is focus on this part of the table to avoid…

    CREGGER: Aaaand….I’m going to text.

    (Laughs)

    CS: So, where did this come from? Did the two of you go into a room and say, “Let’s make a movie”?

    CREGGER: Well, originally, somebody wrote the script for Trevor and I and gave it to Fox and Fox brought it to us and said, “Would you like to re-write this movie and direct it?So we read the script and were not wild about doing a road trip/sex comedy. Just not our sort of thing. So we were really hesitant, but then we thought about it a lot and decided that we could turn it into a challenge ““ a writing challenge ““ and say, “OK, can we take this model that has been done and try and put our stamp on it, push it as far as we can and make it something that we would enjoy and hopefully that others who enjoy our show would enjoy as well.”

    That was our motivation for accepting.

    And so we threw out the script they gave us, the only similarities, every character is different except for Hefner.

    TREVOR MOORE: Hefner wasn’t even in the original script

    CS: Really? A movie abut a girl who becomes a Playboy Playmate doesn’t have Hef in it?

    CREGGER: He wasn’t, you’re right. Originally, they get stuck in a ravine outside the mansion and they have to get rescued by…

    MOORE: I honestly never made it past more than 25 pages of the original script.

    (Laughs)

    CREGGER: I did but out of pure morbid curiosity.

    UNDERWOOD: I feel bad for the guy who wrote it.

    CREGGER: He’s a great guy.

    MOORE: We know him and actually it should be said that we don’t think that it was his intention ““ we think it was his intention just to get us to re-write it. He was basically saying, “I think this is a good idea. Here’s a script. You guys take it and do whatever you want with it.”
    I think the big thing that was kind of the idea that made us think that maybe we could make this something that would be worthwhile for us to do, was the idea of instead of having both characters being obsessed with getting laid ““ which is in every road trip sex comedy, we thought we’d have it just be about putting sex on a pedestal and having an unhealthy viewpoint on sex. So it happens on both ends of the spectrum. The Eugene character is terrified of sex and he is put up as this thing that it starts to hurt his relationship with his girlfriend. Then he begins to hold past partners against her. Then on the other side of that coin, we have the Tucker character who has a good girl, a girl that is probably right for him but he can’t accept that because he doesn’t think he’s lived enough yet, or doesn’t have enough notches in his belt. So, it’s really about these two, completely opposite, but also, completely wrong viewpoints on sex and finding a middle ground in the middle of probably where they both should be.

    CS: When you went to do it, and [looking over to Sara] I’ll pull you into this one because I can see you are not texting right now…

    (Laughs)

    UNDERWOOD: You have my undivided attention.

    CS: There are moments in the film where there is a lot of, for lack of a better word, gags. You shit the floor, Craig Robinson’s nuts…

    MOORE: Lack of nuts.

    CS: Yes, lack of nuts and all that. How did you block with Sara and say, “This is kind of the idea of what we want to do, comedically, but we want to make it funny and not go over the top.Coming from a comedy background in sketch comedy, where do you know where that line is between what’s really funny or what someone would look at and say, “They are just being obnoxious at this point”?

    MOORE: You just have to go with your gut. It’s kind of like a fingerprint. Everybody’s personal style ““ it’s just something that is your sensibility. Where you think the line is or how you would tell that joke and hopefully enough people are on that same page that you are. There are some people who would go like that joke could go even more low brow or some people ““ like the way we did it was too low brow.

    CREGGER: Our rule is that if it makes us laugh out loud while we’re writing then it probably will go in.

    CS: And during the process of writing, getting Craig Robinson, getting Hugh Hefner in the picture, how hard was that coming from a couple guys that have a sketch show and will you be in our movie? How hard was that to get everyone on board?

    CREGGER: Craig just auditioned.

    MOORE: It was his first audition after Knocked Up. He came in and auditioned. It was one of those things where we had a couple options of people, different comedians who had come in and done well and would have been fun but then Craig just came in and right off the bat basically was the character you see in the movie. Just got the character, was him from the very beginning. The art direction for Craig would be like, “Remember what you said back there, use that, do that again.” It was very little direction for him because he really got the character. As soon as he left and shut the door, it was like, “Call his agent, call his agent.” We knew right off that bat that he was the guy.

    CS: How did you know she was right?

    MOORE: We did the movie without Playboy’s involvement originally. We had Robert Wagner playing Hefner. We shot it because when you are dealing with a company as iconic as Playboy you don’t know how seriously they are going to take their image and don’t know who much they are going to micro-manage the script. That was our paranoia. So we were like, “Let’s just do it without Playboy being involved.Then, when we screened it, the movie tested well all the way through except when Hefner would come out and then there was just a disconnect. Even though Robert Wagner did an awesome job they were just thinking, “Why didn’t they get Hugh Hefner? That’s weird.”

    CREGGER: Especially with the TV show now and Hef’s more in the limelight now than in the last 10 years.

    MOORE: Yeah, so you can just see in the eyes that, that’s not happening. So we knew it was a problem and knew we had to see if Hefner would actually do it. We showed him the movie and we were really lucky that he liked it, wanted to be in it, and didn’t want to change anything. Our fears were for naught. He was totally down to do it the way we had written it. Then he sent us some reels of some Playboy Playmates and we saw some footage that Sara had done and there was something that was just very likable and sweet about Sara.

    CS: There was. Sara is very sweet on camera. Very demure. Not that I’ve met any other playmates but the kind of vibe that they put out is that they are beautiful and have a certain air but with Sara it was very natural…and kind of like the girl next door for lack of a better word.

    MOORE: It was an instant likability ““ I don’t want to say anything bad about other playmates, but there is more of an instant likability than other playmates. That’s really good for doing this movie and the point of the movie in some way in that the Cindy character is not a bad person because she’s in Playboy so meeting another playmate like that just reinforces.

    CS: And that part, the moment in the movie when Hugh talks about the ugly girl next door, how many takes did that take because it looked, for a comedy, it looked very natural for him. I can see that if he delivered that it could seem kind of stilted, or awkward but it seemed very natural, very easy.

    CREGGER: Not that many. I think maybe three or four. He was just really eager to cooperate. If he did a take and you wanted him to do it different, he was fine. You never know what you’re going to get when dealing with someone like that. He used to be so powerful. No incentive for him to be in this movie other than really wanting to help us out. He just came out of I’m going to help these guys and make it as good as possible. He was enthusiastic which is why he came across that way.

    MOORE: What we didn’t know until yesterday, Sara said the day before he was studying his lines and taking it very seriously and trying to get it down. It was really kind of impressive.

    UNDERWOOD: He said it was the most lines he’s had in a movie. He said he’s done cameos. But he had a lot of lines in that and he was really nervous about it.

    MOORE: I think that was amazing that this guy has other stuff to do. This is not a make or break to his career.

    CS: I’m shocked. The last time I saw him was probably in Beverly Hills Cops II. That’s the last time I saw him on screen.

    CREGGER: He was in House Bunny.

    CS: Didn’t see it. I’m sorry. Last movie that was aimed at the ladies I did see was HE’S JUST NOT THAT INTO YOU.

    UNDERWOOD: Was that good?

    CS: It was pretty awful.

    CREGGER: But they had so many stars in it.

    (Laughs)

    CS: You would think! Obnoxious. You two both have co-directing credits on this. How was the relationship? Anything along the lines of “I don’t know about this”, “I don’t agree with that?” Or was that not an issue?

    MOORE: We wrote it together so by the time that you are shooting, we already voiced the characters while we were writing it. Kind of like acting it out as we were writing it. So, there’s not a whole lot left up to discussion by the time we are on the set, except for angles and camera equipment and stuff like that. So the beginning of each day we just walk though and set that up and it was pretty good.

    CS: Seeing the film ““ the finished product ““ you are used to doing half hours at a time, how was it now looking at the finished product and seeing what you have on screen? Did you get everything you wanted to get or did you say, oh, I wish I would have gotten something different here?

    CREGGER: I can’t help but think that. That’s just how it happens when you do this. When I watch it I see every little thing I wish I could change. Not that I don’t like the movie, it’s just when you slave over something…I wish I could have another tweeking. Just the nature of the beast. Got to let the baby go. But there are also things that work very well. In a couple of years I’ll be able to watch it without any of that stuff.

    CS: How do you feel about the filmmaking process itself when you compare it to your television work?

    MOORE: There’s pros and cons to it. I think by nature I enjoy television a little more because of the immediacy of it. I love writing and I love writing something, shooting it and throwing it out there. Immediate audience feedback on it. But this you have to do something for two years. I do like doing movies but to direct something again it would have to be something I really, really cared about and thought that I need to direct this or else it won’t have the right tone. I think the next thing I would want to direct is a wise kids movie because I don’t think that is something you could turn over to just another director. We would have to direct that. But, I’m interested in just writing stuff and not directing it unless it’s a pet project.

    CS: Sara, as a bonus for you not texting the whole time, I’ll give you the final question real fast. Your experience on the film, what did you take away from working with these two?

    UNDERWOOD: They make fun of me every time I say it like I’m brown nosing, but it was exciting to be in it. They wrote it, directed it and stared in it and they are really talented and I think they are upcoming stars and I think that it’s cool to be a part of their first movie. They have some much more cool stuff ahead of them.

  • Trailer Park: Exclusive Screening – DUPLICITY

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    I’m awesome. I wrote a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

    And now, you can follow me on Twitter. Find me here, my oh so original name on the thing is Stipp so come on and follow my stray ramblings. From standing in a pool of toilet water to talking about nothing of great importance you can ensure that I send out quality.

    This year’s first screening for the faithful legion of QuickStopEntertainment readers living in Arizona is for DUPLICITY, starring Julia Roberts and Clive Owen.

    To give you an idea of how far Clive Owen has come since CROUPIER (a fabulous film filled with dark nooks and crannies) the attraction, for me, isn’t so much Roberts as it is Clive. I think he’s shown himself capable of dynamic range and it’s nice to see him in a movie that I think everyone can agree looks to be light and airy like a delicate madeleine pastry. With the heady box office offerings as of late it’s just nice to have one of these kinds of films to look forward to.

    The screening is for this upcoming Monday, March 16, at 7 PM at Harkins Fashion Square in Scottsdale, Arizona. The film opens on March 20th but for those interested in seeing DUPLICITY a few days early just drop me a line at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com. It’s just that easy.

    The film’s synopsis:

    CIA officer Claire Stenwick (Roberts) and MI6 agent Ray Koval (Owen) have left the world of government intelligence to cash in on the highly profitable cold war raging between two rival multinational corporations. Their mission? Secure the formula for a product that will bring a fortune to the company that patents it first.

    For their employers – industry titan Howard Tully (Tom Wilkinson) and buccaneer CEO Dick Garsik (Paul Giamatti) – nothing is out of bounds. But as the stakes rise, the mystery deepens and the tactics get dirtier, the trickiest secret for Claire and Ray is their growing attraction. And as they each try to stay one double-cross ahead, two career loners find their schemes endangered by the only thing they can’t cheat their way out of: love.


  • Trailer Park: WATCHMEN – Review and Interviews

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    I’m awesome. I wrote a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

    And now, you can follow me on Twitter. Find me here, my oh so original name on the thing is Stipp so come on and follow my stray ramblings. From standing in a pool of toilet water to talking about nothing of great importance you can ensure that I send out quality.

    I don’t care what the cool people say.

    The hipsters of the world will have you believe that Comic-Con is a big bloated mess of a convention and that it’s better left to the overweight Chun-Li, Slave Leia, and Wonder Woman impersonators of the world who want to show off their well-deserved muffin tops and cottage cheese thighs. I say “pshaw!” to that as this convention, really, always ends up being the highlight of my summer. I get to go back and see the people who I identify with the most and it allows me to get the hell out of Arizona in order to get moments like this.

    Correspondents who operate out of LA or out of some other major market can’t appreciate what it’s like to be starved for material and access to anyone related with the films we cover so when I had the chance to be a part of these roundtables I couldn’t pass it up. It’s no secret that I abhor the roundtable process, that I am genuinely jealous of any Tom, Dick or Harry who gets even so much as 5 minutes with someone connected to a high-profile film (It’s what brings all the boys to the virtual yard, so to speak) as it’s tough enough trying to sell an editor on running an interview with the guy who might have held a kleig light for a pick-up scene from WANTED so having the full cast from WATCHMEN talk about their roles, months and months before anyone would glimpse what this was all going to look like, was a welcome opportunity.

    Every single person was a live wire when it came to talking about this movie. I think this was one of those moments when you could actually believe the bullshit: these guys got it. Whether they could execute Snyder’s direction, that was still an unknown but looking back at these interviews after seeing the finished film I am struck at how their words weren’t hollow. They all worked as tiny cogs in a bigger wheel that Zack Snyder was tireless in creating. I hope you watch some of what these kids have to say as I equally hope you like this more than having to actually read another WATCHMEN interview.
    [ad#contestbox]

    PART 1:


    PART 2:

    Thanks to Ken Plume for the assist in getting these things digitized in an easily digestible format.

    WATCHMEN – A REVIEW

    Alan Moore, from a recent interview which makes his take on the adaptation of his graphic novel: I think that adaptation is largely a waste of time in almost any circumstances. There probably are the odd things that would prove me wrong. But I think they’d be very much the exception. If a thing works well in one medium, in the medium that it has been designed to work in, then the only possible point for wanting to realize it on ‘multiple platforms,’ as they say these days, is to make a lot of money out of it. There is no consideration for the integrity of the work, which is rather the only thing as far as I’m concerned.”

    “Can one desire too much of a good thing?” As You Like It, Act IV, Sc. I

    When director Lambert Hillyer took on Batman in the 1940’s, bringing the great cowled one to the screen for what was the first of many live action iterations, he made Bruce Wayne something more akin to a savior for the public than the vigilante lunatic he really is when you take the time to break down the idea. Of course, comics are a place of Never Never Land and Hillyer, over a half-century ago, embraced that false sense of reality. Comics embraced this false sense of reality. Superman was the indestructible force that indirectly belonged solely to the United States. Of course, he would fly to Germany to set things straight during World War II, we can’t have too much reality getting in the way of our comics, but it was escapism. And kids loved it.

    Then those kids grew up and saw the world was obviously a lot more gray than the hard and fast black and white of their pulpy confections.

    Alan Moore was one of those kids who saw the world of comics as fertile ground for a little existential exercise into what it means to be a hero, a cape, a crusader for people. What he came up, The Watchmen, is the perfect blending of thoughtful prose, dynamic characters and a storyline, in postmodern theory, that we all take for granted today. Could anyone debate whether THE DARK KNIGHT could have worked in the 50’s or 60’s? Sure, but the real answer is that before Moore took on the task of throwing childish comics and melding it with the seedy, dank recesses of culture’s greatest sins and vices there wasn’t a language to interpret it. Any cultural anthropologist worth their salary will tell you that the 40s and 50s were not, in fact, any gem to be revered in American society. There were the same social problems then as there is now and Moore has bridged the generation gap to show and prove the biggest point, in my opinion, of his graphic novel: Man’s inhumanity to man will never cease or relent. Rape, murder, violence, malevolence will always reign exist somewhere in our collective lives and to think different about it not only makes you ignorant of the facts but part of the larger problem.

    What Zack Snyder has done, you see, is distilled equal parts commentary and equal parts violence and mashed it together with a love story that, for better or worse, doesn’t leave you completely despairing over the fate of humankind. The real exciting thing about this film is that you have one of two ways to enter this picture: 1) completely oblivious to the source material or 2) somewhat knowledgeable of everything that’s going to happen. I happened to be in the latter camp while the person I went with fell squarely in the former. Both of us were impacted by Snyder’s vision and ended up on the same side of the discussion as the movie let out. Really, if you meditate on it, Snyder had to account for both audiences. He wanted to keep the fidelity to the source material closer than anyone else could have done it but he needed to make sure there were enough bread and circuses to keep the masses happy. This graphic novel eschews violence insofar as it is a commentary on the human condition, these “heroes” completely fallible and broken, human, and the lengths some will go to prove how committed they are to their ideals.

    For Rorschach, the violence feels wholly a function of his upbringing, his life as a neglected and abused child; his actions, lunatic though he may be, serve his warped sensibilities in a way that no one has ever explored before. Sure, we have countless comic versions on this theme but to say Alan Moore was the first to do it would be to give short shrift to the other personalities he was able to lay claim to examining. Dr. Manhattan, a God of a man given to fits of dissonance to those who want him to be their savior, while he sees the human population for what they are: parasitic organisms obsessed with self-destruction. Billy Crudup’s syllogistic intonations and ruminations are the highlights of this film as his words feel less like comic monologues but observations on humankind that are disturbingly real. The Nite Owl, played by Patrick Wilson is pure delight. Pathetic, to be sure, impotent and a bit of a wimp to begin this is the character that you root for as you see the struggle in the man’s spirit. Too modest to be a lecherous knave like The Comedian, Dan wants to be more than he is. He is not content to be useless to a country that doesn’t want him but he’s not the same man we know him to be by the end of the movie as he was when we first meet him. Wilson is easily one of the bright spots in a movie that doesn’t have a lot of light to give. His relationship with Dr. Manhattan’s on again, off again lady, Silk Spectre brings humanity to a movie that is on genuine need of it.

    However, it’s The Comedian’s turn as the resident sleaze, played by Jeffrey Dean Morgan, that is the only real downfall of this film. In flashbacks to when he was still alive and kicking ass Morgan plays him with a bombast that doesn’t quite work well on the screen. He feels campy, like he’s almost putting on a show. The Comedian should have come across as more brusque and sinister but what we get is a comic book interpretation of what The Comedian seems to be. His moments in the film are hit or miss when it comes to their effectiveness but it’s usually those he is playing off who come off as the real deal. Dr. Manhattan, in comparison, wipes the screen clear with his blueness and flat tonality. I would hazard a guess as to say that Crudup is the very best part of this movie and he, along with Rorschach, make the running time seem meaningless. Crudup understands Manhattan in a way that I don’t think I have when you consider Crudup’s tone. He is smooth, almost whispering. You forget this is a god among men as when he talks he makes complete and total sense. The moment he has with Malin Akerman on Mars is worth your full attention. Rorschach, as previously mentioned, is completely arresting and, oddly, sympathetic at times. As an example, and all bad Christian Bale voice comparisons aside, when Jackie Earle Haley is having his impromptu psych evaluation inside the state penitentiary, Jackie thunderously blends voice over, performance and nuance that when he dispatches a child molester you not only recoil in horror at the savage act being depicted on the screen but, again, he engenders sympathy in an odd, odd way. We understand his motivations. They may not be very Christian but, for him, he is the result of the age old question of nature versus nurture. He’s weirdly the guy you root for throughout the picture. I did anyway and I have no idea what that says about my own psychology but I think it’s a valid point. Both Rorschach and Nite Owl are kindred spirits and in a landscape full of those who have no chemistry with one another you can believe these two are friends.

    In the background to all of this is Snyder who has, without question, created a faithful adaption to Moore’s work. I think you can quibble here about the level of fidelity he has brought to the visual storytelling that he so wanted to retain but there is something that I hope to recuse myself of doing: casting judgment on a less than viewed film. It’s no secret that Snyder had to trim this movie in order for it to be as long as it is now and there are signs that things here were snipped, things over here were trimmed. Expediency took precedence over what his full vision really encompassed. I fear that the things that I take issue with, the hurried moments between characters when there was obviously more to say, the sequences that feel rushed, are all there except they have been taken out, temporarily. As it stands, however, this movie is an artistic movement of both social commentary and the hopes and wishes we put upon our heroes. Snyder takes a page from As You Like It in that he understands if you’re going to bum everyone out with the high concept you better deliver on some sweet bloodletting. He gives us this book’s bread and circuses on a visual palette that mixes soundtracks and sights that evoke a period not so removed from our own.

    The film has to be so many things to so many people but Snyder takes the risk by doing the honorable thing which is being true to what was on the page. The debate can rage without me as it pertains to whether he stays too close to the novel but the penultimate fight sequence, the prison, Mars, the opening moments, Dan and Spectre’s love tryst all outweigh small problems compared to what should be held in the same regard as Peter Jackson’s LORD OF THE RINGS trilogy. To be sure, Jackson had a lot of runway to pave his own vision but flipping through the graphic novel you could see where the challenges were all but apparent.

    The Watchmen prove that there is much we have yet to learn from history and ourselves as beasts and Snyder has indeed given a film that slides narrowly on that line of artistic endeavor and full-throttle action.

    ———————

    And now, some misguided ramblings from our own Raymond Schillaci who is back from seeing THE CURIOUS CASE OF BENJAMIN BUTTON. Welcome to 2009, Raymond…

    The Curious Case of Oscar Slumming

    Okay, so I have been away for a while without a good excuse to bring something to the table.Never mind that I have been wowed by the likes of “Son of Rambow,” “Let the Right One In” and “Gran Torino”.If you have not seen them rush to the nearest video (when they are released) store (or NetFlix) and rent them because they are far more articulate, artistic and deeper than the choice for Oscar’s best picture, director or adapted screenplay, “Slumdog Millionaire”. Mind you, I did appreciate director Boyle’s picture and I was touched, but Oscar, once again, missed the big picture.They missed it by a mile, especially not recognizing Boyle’s efforts with a far better earlier picture, “Millions”.

    Was it circumstance, fate or just the academy’s lack of attention that had given the kitschy “Slumdog” an undeserving sweep?Will anybody talk about it years from now or will they stumble upon the more deserving fair as mentioned above? Perhaps Fincher’s film, “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button” will be far more appreciated as years go by.It certainly was an intricate, beautifully done piece of work from beginning to end.It did not truncate itself with a self-indulging dance sequence that Bollywood loves to propagate.Perhaps it was a direct example of the global economy and political correctness filtering through our film industry.

    Whatever it is, it’s disappointing to say the least after I have just watched Fincher’s adult masterwork.Forget the comparisons to “Forest Gump” they are undeserved.This is a wonderful human odyssey.For those Pitt nay Sayers, leave your jealousy at the door.Pitt delivers a wonderful portrayal of a simple man with a complex problem attempting to wrestle down all the big questions life has to offer with the added twist of physically living it backwards.

    Fincher with all the dark baggage he has brought to his other masterpieces, “7even” and “Fight Club” sets everything aside to show us his warm and fuzzy side.No, it’s not sappy, melodramatic or over-the-top.It’s a sincere poetic allegory that carries you through Benjamin’s strange journey and all the people he affects and the funny and unusual way life works itself out.Fincher paints his tale with broad strokes taking us from BB’s birth (as an old man), his awkward dealing as he goes through adolescence (still as a senior citizen) with the yearning of wanting to relate to other children to mid-life where the greatest years are lived and finally reaching an inevitable youngster dealing with dementia. It is heart-wrenching and may have fallen into maudlin territory if Fincher and writer Roth had not ventured further taking us into the character’s various loves (including his surrogate mother ““ played with remarkable perfection by Taraji P Henson), friends and acquaintances that make up a person throughout one’s life.

    I could go on and on about the attention to detail from costume, sets and props. I could probably give a little more detail to this amazing story, but I would rather have it take you by pleasant surprise as it did me.It’s a great date movie, but do not mistake this as a chick flick.If you have any kind of heart at all, you will feel this film pull on the strings several times and find yourself looking for a hanky.I saw it alone, which made it twice as hard.No, I’m not wimping out, but I am a romantic and Fincher’s film is far more charismatic and romantic than “Slumdog”.I only hope the director will visit this kind of wonderment filmmaking again so he may receive the kudos he deserves, along with a golden guy spearheading him to legendary status.

  • Trailer Park: BITCH SLAP Interview

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    I’m awesome. I wrote a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

    And now, you can follow me on Twitter. Find me here, my oh so original name on the thing is Stipp so come on and follow my stray ramblings. From standing in a pool of toilet water to talking about nothing of great importance you can ensure that I stand for quality.

    So, stop me if you’ve heard this one before: I’m in a hotel bed with three ladies…

    The promotion of BITCH SLAP, coming your way very soon in 2009, was a masterstroke of genius. Simply put web journalists who came to the San Diego Comic-Con to talk to fully clothed actors and actresses in sterile press chicken coops the opportunity to interview Julia Voth, Erin Cummings and America Olivo, three gorgeous ladies who deserve kudos for both being pretty and witty, about a movie that hasn’t come out yet…in bed.

    Look, I’ve been married for 7 years. I have 2 little girls at home. I can’t even bear to even give the appearance of impropriety. But, as I slid onto the edge of the king sized mattress, knowing this was going to be a complete off the cuff interview about what in the world this movie was about, I will admit I was like a schoolboy being introduced to three sirens who would have just as soon laughed at my dweebiness than carrying on a coherent conversation with me.

    I can’t say one way or the other about whether you should see this film but after talking with these girls, talking with the writer/director at length about what he wanted to do with this film (shot with a RED to boot), seeing the footage and then seeing this extended trailer I know that I will be giving this one my money when given the chance. The comparisons will come that this film is trying to be everything that GRINDHOUSE was not and I think that’s valid. Rodriguez and Tarantino did not capture the essence of those film and, instead, made the visual equivalent of a cover song but what BITCH SLAP looks to be doing, then, is to really embody those randy sexploitation films in an honest, fun and loud fashion.

    Watch the interview I had with, let’s face it, the three hottest ladies you’ll see on this site today… BITCH SLAP is coming to theaters this spring…
    [ad#contestbox]

    PART 1:


    PART 2:


    PART 3:

  • Trailer Park: Vinessa Shaw (TWO LOVERS) – Interview

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    I’m awesome. I wrote a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

    And now, you can follow me on Twitter. Find me here, my oh so original name on the thing is Stipp so come on and follow my stray ramblings.

    Now, before I begin today’s interview this week’s DVD Giveaway is being brought to you by SWING VOTE on DVD. I have five (5) copies of this film to give out and if you’re interested in being considered for one just send me a note to Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com and just put SWING VOTE in the subject line. Good luck and for those who would like to know about this film here is the synopsis:

    Bud Johnson (Kevin Costner) is just your below-average Joe. He works in an egg factory, likes to knock back a few too many beers, and is a single parent to 12-year-old Molly (Madeline Carroll), a bright spitfire who does her best to keep her dad on the straight and narrow. Patriotic Molly insists that apathetic Bud do his civic duty and vote in the upcoming presidential election, a tight race between Republican incumbent Andrew Boone (Kelsey Grammer) and Democratic candidate Donald Greenleaf (Dennis Hopper). Soon the media and both candidates descend upon Bud’s hometown of Texico, New Mexico, when it’s determined that his vote wasn’t counted and will decide the outcome of the entire presidential election. Now that Bud is a ‘somebody’ – there’s even a ‘Bud Cam’ capturing his every move – will he be swayed by visits to Air Force One and the ‘Bud Ball’ held in his honor, or will he be the voice of the American people and vote for the better candidate?

    Writer/director Joshua Michael Stern (NEVERWAS) tackles American politics in his second feature film. The lengths the candidates go to in order to win Bud’s vote are high points of the film, as they find themselves supporting initiatives that are completely opposed to their platforms at the urging of their campaign managers, played by Stanley Tucci and Nathan Lane. Grammer is well cast as Boone, and it’s a hoot to see counterculture icon Hopper in this light. Costner makes Bud likable despite the loser stereotype he personifies. But this film belongs to Carroll, a lovely young actress who can steal a scene with one look. If nothing else, SWING VOTE is a reminder that even though politics may be a game, every single vote really does count.

    ———————

    Quiet.

    It’s the best way to describe TWO LOVERS, a film that takes the archetype of a man torn between two women, one sultry while the other is, well, not, and turns it enough to make this movie one you have to seek out and watch. James Gray has crafted world where place and time actually matter, the environment seeps into every scene, and it enhances this timeless story of restlessness and the quest for finding the love you can call your own.

    Starring Joaquin Phoenix, Gwyneth Paltrow and, today’s guest, Vinessa Shaw, the film is gingerly making its way through the art house circuit. You may have seen Vinessa in countless television or film productions, most recently her turns in 2006’s THE HILLS HAVE EYES and 2007’s 3:10 TO YUMA, and it is the latter film that most would probably recognize her from, albiet not in the most opportune way. Vinessa indirectly got caught up in a sort of Perv-Gate case between Internet blogger Jeff Wells and YUMA’s director, James Mangold. The particulars are there for you to see but it tickled me to see that almost a year later, when this film screened last year in May, his mention of the film added this footnote at the bottom of his comments: “Sidenote: anyone who chimes in about Shaw in a certain context — you know what I mean — will be banned for life from this website. Fair warning.” His reprint of this column, centering around the film’s debut a few weeks ago, noticeably had the above comment deleted.

    Regardless, Vinessa is spectacular in every regard in this film. It’s harder, I would posit, to be demure and muted in a film when you’re having to go up against two other characters like Phoenix and Paltrow who made it their business to be known on the screen. Seek this one out. It’s one of the best films to come out this Winter.

    VINESSA SHAW: Hi, Chris…

    CHRISTOPHER STIPP: Hello…

    SHAW: How are you?

    CS: How are you doing and how’s your press day going?

    SHAW: Good. Very good. Thanks for asking.

    CS: Is this part of the job that you like or could do without?

    SHAW: I actually like it. There’s such a long time from the end of shooting to the release that talking about it refreshes you and reminds you why you liked doing what you did in the film.

    CS: One of the things I wanted to ask you because I know our time is not that great but I would like to jump right into the character that you play. Opposite of Gwyneth Paltrow ““ the two of you are set up as diametric opposites. You are the safe and sane bet and Gwyneth plays the sort of firecracker. What initially drew you to a story that we’ve seen so many times before?

    SHAW: Well, I really appreciated the honesty with which James wrote the piece because I felt like everything I read now is tongue-in-cheek and filed with irony and I just felt that everybody was straightforward and honest. Even if they had a lot of skeletons in their closet they were honest and felt like the characters leapt off the page for me. And I really particularly liked how Sandra and Leonard related to each other. I really liked Sandra’s amazing self-confidence she had yet still maintained a sense of awkwardness about her in speaking with Leonard and I really just appreciated the real true relationships the people had in this movie. It was very honest even if it’s complicated.

    CS: And definitely compared to something like The Hills Have Eyes where you had a large production…this seems a little bit quieter.

    SHAW: It’s very quiet. When I read it I thought it felt like a Mike Nichols film or something from the 70’s which I later found out that James is a huge fan of 70’s film and intimacy that those films had. It was a pleasure and such a refreshing thing to read.

    CS: James’s aim ““ and when you see the final piece ““ it does feel like a movie we haven’t seen in a long, long time. He’s not being ironic, like you said, he’s being honest and trying to capture this moment in time. How did you come to feel what James’s vision was for this movie?

    SHAW: I didn’t know quite the scope of how he would be filming the film until I got on set. I really started to see how simply he wanted to portray the characters and how each person’s life was true to life. Michelle and her glitzy boyfriend, her world seemed very real to me. I don’t know. I felt the way that I encountered or understood the scope of what James was doing was really how I felt when I was in Leonard’s bedroom or the kind of clothes that I wore. So, James didn’t take me through it but he knew that he wanted me to be simple and not fussy in terms of her clothing and the way that she is ““ Sandra is so I think you see that how Sandra is herself. I wasn’t privy to any of the lighting or the scope of the scene but I could feel it when I was on the set in Brighton Beach ““ tiny little rooms and small corridors ““ it was very intimate and lent for intimacy in the scene.

    CS: Your character has been described as dowdy, frumpy, all these sort of terms ““ not flattering but obviously part of the role – and Gwyneth is supposed to jump off the page with her exuberance and what have you. It got me thinking. Why isn’t dependable attractive in movies? I mean, I think I understand it. I’m no slouch and I can appreciate why chaste doesn’t sell well but I would figure that your character would be the one to appreciate ““ the crazy ladies in films always end up boiling bunnies and rabbits in your stew like Glenn Close in Fatal Attraction. Why isn’t safe attractive?

    SHAW: I think, of course, that we want to go and see a movie and go into an adventuresome world where we can escape from our own trappings, but I think we have to see, and it’s comforting to see, that Leonard goes on a crazy journey but does return back home.

    The Wizard of Oz in a way, a physical way, going to another land and coming back but I think Leonard is dealing with the traumas he’s had of losing his fiancé and he’s kind of exploring the different sides of his character and some of it’s dark and not pretty and he has to deal with the ramifications of having that dark side to him. And he goes there in order to come back to where he was in the beginning and realizes where he’s been almost like a dream. I think in the end most people would find it comforting that he does come back and hopefully they survive their relationship because most people could consider I wonder what will happen to Leonard but I really wonder what will happen to Sandra. Will she be able to withstand all his ups and downs and his antics?

    CS: Exactly. It’s always the after story. It’s never a happily ever after and I think it gets to the heart of the movie that James is trying to make a truthful movie. I would love to know what you saw with why James seems to love working with Joaquin. It’s a no-brainer why someone would not want to work with him but they’ve worked together so often ““ how does that relationship translate on set?

    SHAW: They are almost familial. It’s almost like they are family. I feel that Joaquin really trusts James as a director and he has a small close group of friends and I know he considers James as one of them. James is someone he can really trust so I think he can play any character with James as the director and he would know that whatever comes up on screen, he would feel comfortable with. I have head that Joaquin doesn’t see any of his movies.

    CS: Really?

    SHAW: Yes. He doesn’t watch any of his own films so I think that that plays a lot into whom he works with is that it’s if he feels comfortable on set with the person not really what happens on screen after the fact.

    CS: How about you? Do you ever watch, re-watch, what you’ve been in for premiers or what have you?

    SHAW: Yes. I don’t mind it at all. I enjoy it. The way I grew up, my mother would, because I was so rebellious as a kid with my mother ““ I started acting on the job. I didn’t go to any classes so my mother, I apologize to her now, but she had to be with me questioning her why would I do it that way, why take that stance on the character and she was fine, I will just record you and you can direct and judge yourself. So then she would record me for auditions before I would go in so I can make adjustments. So I’m very comfortable seeing myself play characters and having a more objective view of myself.

    CS: Looking over your resume about where you’ve been for the last 15 years, you have been through a litany of television and film. How has life of an actor been as you look at how far you’ve come in the time you spent doing this?

    SHAW: It’s so interesting because I think it’s all your perspective. Right now I feel like I’m just beginning. Maybe that is perhaps what makes an actor survive in this business ““ your constant curiosity and your tendency to feeling like that you have never arrived. I’m always feeling like I’m searching to play a more difficult character that would challenge me even more. So, looking back I feel like I’m just beginning. I feel like the training or roots have sunk in deep but I have yet to blossom into who I really am as an actor. I think I have yet to discover what that truly is.

    CS: And I think I would absolutely second that. It’s funny how I heard about you, or discovered you, a couple years ago when you were in 3:10 to Yuma and internet blogger Jeff Wells petitioned James Mangold for topless photos of you. It’s an awful origin story and and I don’t know if you’ve heard about that brouhaha…

    SHAW: I’ve heard that story in retrospect, yes.

    (Laughs)

    CS: It’s a little awkward but it indirectly made me want to know who you were. So I had to find out I watched 3:10 to Yuma was taken aback. I had to find out what else you’ve been in and I found you’ve been at this now for years. And it’s funny, I’d love to get your take as to why, but there seems to be some actress who come right out of the gate with something that’s just huge and you look on their IMDB page it just two films and they are already in the latest Jerry Bruckheimer production. How has it been mentally to say, “You know what, I haven’t hit my plateau yet, I keep going, reaching…”

    SHAW: I really enjoy it because I just cringe when people would say “the IT girl”. Any of those things, I never wanted to be a flash in the pan. I really wanted to have a career that had longevity so I did my very, very best to make that happen. It’s so easy to type cast anyone in this business. How you look or how you act and I just refused to be typecast and people wanted to make me the girl next door, then, “No, she’s the hot sexy girl, oh no, she’s the wacky comedic lady, no, she’s”¦” I just want to be an actor and be able to explore any kind of role I want to.

    So, I made a huge effort to continue to be an actor and a director’s actor. So, I worked with people who would put me in that realm. I was very specific and it has taken a lot of crafting and time to do it that way because my full vision is to have a long career. It kind of freaked me out because I saw a lot of my peers go really fast and quick to the top. I would feel I wouldn’t have anything behind me to support the reason for me to be there. I am somebody who feels I need to work hard for what success I achieve.

  • Trailer Park: Julian Morris (DONKEY PUNCH) – Interview

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    I’m awesome. I wrote a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

    And now, you can follow me on Twitter. Find me here, my oh so original name on the thing is Stipp so come on and follow my stray ramblings. I’m really digging being able to follow such luminaries as Not Henry Rollins, Not Gene Simmons and others who aren’t the real celebutards they lead you to believe they are. It’s Web 2.0! Catch it!

    Now, before we get into the interview with Julian Morris of DONKEY PUNCH I have some things to give away.

    Specifically, I have 5 copies of the Buena Vista Home Entertainment release of BLINDNESS starring Julianne Moore and Mark Ruffalo. I also have a metric ton of posters featuring the image to the very right so if you’re looking to spruce up a cheery room here is your opportunity. For those who are unfamiliar with the film’s premise it is as follows:

    From acclaimed director Fernando Meirelles (“The Constant Gardener”) comes this extraordinarily intense and gritty thriller that will change your vision of the world forever. Led by a powerful all-star cast featuring Julianne Moore, Mark Ruffalo and Danny Glover, this unflinching story begins when a plague of blindness strikes and threatens all of humanity. One woman (Moore) feigns the illness to share an uncertain fate in quarantine, where society is breaking down as fast as their crumbling surroundings. Based on Nobel Prize-winning Jose Saramago’s novel – let “Blindness” lead you on a journey where the only thing more terrifying than being blind is being the only one who can see.

    If you’re interested in winning a copy, drop me a line at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com. I can’t think of anything difficult for you to win one so we’ll make this a first come, first served giveaway. And, because of some issues of shipping to locales out of North America, we’ll limit this contest to our neighbors to the north and anyone in the continental United States. It’s not that I don’t love you nutty Europeans but tracking this stuff to make sure it gets to you has been a pain. Blame the postal system.

    Now, on with the interview…

    ———————–

    The thing about Julian is that he’s a great interview.

    The man has a way with casual conversation that you wonder if he’s been doing this for a long time or if he’s just that sincere when he talks about what gets him excited with regard to his work. The first time I talked to him it was over some water at the Beverly Hills Hotel (a swank locale that is excruciatingly difficult to navigate into but reeks of people who have more money than I’ll ever see in this lifetime) and I was struck by his genial and affable nature. That’s why when it was he who I could talk to regarding his newest venture, DONKEY PUNCH, I not only said yes but I campaigned to speak to him; it’s just easier when you have a connection with someone, however tenable and dubious the tether, that this helps to kick start a conversation when you only have 15 minutes to talk.

    You’ve got to be able and make the subject feel comfortable and when you’re doing it over the phone it’s almost like you’re rushing a relationship where no one has the time for witless banter. Julian, though, is a true gentleman in the sense he’s willing to share his thoughts but is willing to go that extra few inches and talk about what he’s really thinking. It may not mean much to you, those who are reading this, but for someone like me, who is stuck on the other end of the phone, it’s the difference between a long 15 minutes and a conversation you wish could go a little longer. To be sure, you’ll hopefully be reading another conversation between him and I in the near future.

    Again, like last week, DONKEY PUNCH is in limited release and will be out on video in mere months.

    JULIAN MORRIS: Chris?

    CHRISTOPHER STIPP: Sir…

    MORRIS: Good to hear your voice again.

    CS: You too. How have you been?

    MORRIS: The last time was the Beverly Hills Hotel, right?

    CS: That’s correct. How have things been?

    MORRIS: Since I’ve seen you last, things have been incredible. Social’s been great. Life’s great. Did a movie with Tom Cruise. Did, this one, DONKEY PUNCH. Played a doctor on ER. What else? Got another movie coming out this year that you would be interested in, called SORORITY ROW.

    CS: Well, I had no idea that you were in this film. Zero.

    MORRIS: What? You saw it?

    CS: I’m having a copy being sent to me. I think it’s at my house today.

    MORRIS: Great.

    CS: I’m hoping to be able to watch it tonight. I’ve just culled a bunch of information about it and now I’m really amped to see it at least after reading everything about it.

    MORRIS: It’s pretty out there. I’m really proud of it. I think it’s really different from movies that are being made for our demographic. It’s a smart movie. Incredibly disturbing but people get a kick out of it.

    CS: How did it come across your table? And I only ask because I know because Ollie [Blackburn] is a first time director. This film was only made for less than a million pounds if I am to believe the reports.

    MORRIS: Well, I loved Oliver Blackburn’s reel. I loved the short films that he’s done. I loved the videos he’s done. And when we were meeting to discuss the film ““ his insights into the character and his vision really excited me. And also with the way he directs, you would never believe he is a first time director. He directs with the confidence and also the ease of someone who has been doing it for decades. So, how I came about it was being in America a lot I was shooting this film Privileged and my agent called me up from London and said there is a script that I think you will love and initially I was being looked at for another part but I really like the character I play and when you see it you will understand why. He’s interesting. At the beginning he’s quite shy, slightly awkward, young man but with this huge internal to be the alpha male or at least within the respect of the huge chasm between the man that he is and the man that he wants to be and that was really exciting to play out. He does the famous Donkey Punch. How could I say no to that?

    (Laughs)

    CS: Exactly. That’s all I’ve been hearing about this technique. How was it doing the thriller/horror genre? You’ve been through it now with your other film…

    MORRIS: CRY WOLF…

    CS: So do you have this down to a science about what it takes?

    MORRIS: I guess I’ve been lucky in that all the characters I’ve played have been exceptionally different. Josh is very different from Owen in CRY WOLF. And not only that, the movies have been very different. Whereas CRY WOLF is, I don’t want to say generic, but it was a very Hollywood slasher of it’s time and I think that a film like SORORITY ROW which I just did is like a remake of one of those 90’s films like SCREAM ““ a lot of that dark twisted humor running though it and DONKEY PUNCH is more intellectual and serious one. I don’t know that I would describe it as a horror film as much as fascist almost in it’s intensity of extreme thriller in the way STRAW DOGS was and I know that Pauline Kael, the terrific critic, she coined it “fascist cinema” and I think DONKEY PUNCH is more in that genre. Like Michael Haneke’s film, FUNNY GAMES, CACHE, etc.

    CS: Speaking of the way the movie unwinds, I read that it was very unique in that it was almost shot in sequence.

    MORRIS: Yes, the director was great. Some things were done on stage and that was separate, but it was all one location on the boat, either below the boat or on deck and did that in sequence setting up the character development.

    CS: The old adage of you never shoot on water

    MORRIS: You never work with animals or kids…especially in porn.

    (Laughs)

    You know what? I think it was surprisingly nice shooting on water. It was a gorgeous super yacht that was the kind that you see on MTV owned my wealthy people or huge rock stars. It was great fun. And also the fact that we were all on this boat in this relatively small space. There weren’t dressing rooms, never in trailers, a single green room. We would be there in our wet costumes when it was cold, covered in blood and it was intense. There was never escape of the characters or anyone else and I think that intensity comes through in the film.

    CS: How was that? Now you’ve been on a few sets of this kind ““ this variety. What kind of challenges does horror, an intense thriller, like this present? What do you have to bring to a role to really get that kind of emotion across in your performance?

    MORRIS: Well I think in any scene you want to bring realism. I think with the horror genre you tend to be looking at the emotion of fear a lot and particularly with horror and I think it’s true with all cinema, at least in the cinema I like to make and the characterization I like to make, you want it to be an incredibly empathetic vicarious experience for the viewer in a sense that I want the audience to empathize with my character plus I want them to feel what my character is going through. Any successful cinema, when you are feeling what that character is going through, when you are in that experience, so whether I’m running away from a nice bear I can cry wolf I want the audience to be running with me. I want them to get that tightness in their chest, their heart pounding or in this film ““ there’s a torture scene and I’m digging a knife in someone (I hope I didn’t give anything away but I think it’s fine to say) I want the audience to be torturing that character with me or at least going through what I’m thinking and what I’m feeling while I’m doing it. If I’ve done that successfully that’s great. If not, oops.

    CS: And I guess on that point as well and something I want to bring back with your stint on ER for a few episodes, is the idea of ensemble acting. How is that working within a group, is there a dynamic of sorts that has to take place, whereas do you have to throw it back or forward to make sure you don’t overshine anybody?

    MORRIS: Ensemble is great. I think when you are in the lead in something there is just so much what the audience sees but there’s a lot of you are on your own a lot just because of how the filming and the machinations of the filming takes place. When you are doing a scene with a lot of other actors it won’t always be with the same people you’ll be in your travel a lot of the time. You’ll be first in and last out. You’ll spend a lot of time by yourself. The experience is quite isolated. The experience is all good but it’s isolated. Ensemble acting you are with your cast mates all the time. It’s a different feeling. A great sense of teamwork and I think it helps that you are always with the other actors and feeding off them, bouncing off them, not just on camera but off camera as well so you bring that to the set as well.

    CS: Being that it’s an ensemble, ensemble cast as well, all these things working against you, first of all it’s low budget, second it’s that it’s a first time director, third you are shooting this thing in 24 days. Were there really any challenging moments where people had to come together to get something done, i.e. go beyond your acting duties, or did everything go smoothly?

    MORRIS: This is about two people, the producer, Angus Lamont and also the first AV, Barry Wasserman. I think both AV’s don’t get credit nearly as much as they should but they were really in charge of creating the atmosphere and space on set with which to work between the actors and the directors. They did a tremendous job. So, although we shot in 24 days it was intense. It was challenging. We were jumping in the sea which was probably pretty close to freezing and spent long hours ““ at one point we shot 24 hours straight. We never got the feeling that we were being rushed at all or forced to act on the nail. The space was always really terrific to work in and very comfortable. That said, the intensity of the drive and the excitement of working in such confinement both on the boat and in time, did create a sense of urgency and intensity and I think that comes through in a successful way and translates itself very well into the film.

    CS: Looking at the finished product, what came up on screen, a lot of films try to mimic this, why does this one stand out? Why is this film getting attention?

    MORRIS: Because it’s very real and realism works in a number of ways. It works well for the horror. The horror is this fantastic imagined horror. The baddie isn’t some supernatural being with crazy feet. It’s us. We’re the enemy. The other characters are the enemy. We are each other’s own worst enemy. My character is his own worst enemy. Because it’s so real, the audience can associate with them far more. And in that sense, the experience for them is more haunting and exciting. And the last thing is that it’s real. When these kids are on the boat, and they are young people, they are doing what any other young person would be doing or would like to be doing with their best mates, gorgeous girls, drinking a little bit, skinny dipping in the Mediterranean as the sun’s setting. It’s a crazy orgy. And up until the point of the donkey punch it is really the best of youth or the best of any fanaticized youth. After which these real people are confronted with an extraordinary situation and how they deal with it is probably how many young people would deal with it and try to get away with it. And it all goes wrong and leads to this bloodbath. Does that make any sense?

    CS: What elevated this? From the very beginning you would think that if you were explaining it to someone they would be apt to say “Nah, this seems like just another teen thing” but what elevated it for you?

    MORRIS: I think Oliver Blackburn is probably one of the greatest directors working right now in Britain and his vision was incredible. The cinematic devices he used, whether it was slow motion which was reminiscent of Peckinpah, STRAW DOGS, he drives this menacing destructive crushing atmosphere that’s on this boat and it is a great experience when you are watching it. It’s definitely nails getting right down to the knuckle.

    CS: Julian, I know our time is short so let me ask just one more question of you. You are doing a lot of TV, you’re doing a lot of films now, where is your heart taking you? Do you want to have your cake and eat it to? Do you want to keep doing both? What’s on the horizon?

    MORRIS: Yeah. I think the line now between great film and great TV is diminished. I think it’s quite easy to swim between the two and I’m just enjoying playing great characters and I want to continue playing characters that inspire me and hopefully inspire those that watch them.

  • Trailer Park: Aaron Yoo (FRIDAY THE 13th) – Interview

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    I’m awesome. I wrote a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight”right HERE for free.

    And now, you can follow me on Twitter. Find me here, my oh so original name on the thing is Stipp so come on and follow my stray ramblings.

    Aaron Yoo is the funniest person in FRIDAY THE 13TH. It’s not a distinction that serves him well in this regard but Aaron provides some short and snappy comic relief before coming face to face with the homicidal maniac looking to kill everyone. The genuinely nice thing about Aaron’s performance, though, is that he represented one potential kill in this movie about, well, murder. As I mentioned in my review of the film this entry stands heads and shoulders (ones that haven’t yet been decapitated) above its peers if you were to stack it against the “horror” entries of the 90’s. Back then it seemed to be all about irony and not so much about the killin’. This FRIDAY THE 13TH, though, is all about the killing and I couldn’t have been more delighted. The screams are great, the creativity that went into the kills was inspired and you have what is a rock solid reboot of a film.

    The last time I talked with Aaron he was starring last year in 21 and so having the chance to talk to him again was something I could not pass up. I caught up with Aaron a couple of days ago, the night after the film’s premiere in LA, to talk about Voorhees, the nature of horror and whether Jason ever did a little soft shoe right before takes. FRIDAY THE 13TH opens everywhere today…

    AARON YOO: What’s up?

    CHRISTOPHER STIPP: I saw the movie last night.

    YOO: Were you at that big messy thing we were at?

    CS: No man. I live here in Arizona…so I don’t get to do any of that.

    YOO: Oh, OK. I more or less saw the movie last night myself.

    CS: Really?

    YOO: There was more of a disaster around it probably than was going on around your end. It was just the premiere and those are always like the equivalent of a human shipwreck.

    (Laughs)

    Chaos and more chaos and flashing lights and cameras and afterwords you are stranded on an island of alcohol.

    (Laughs)

    CS: Well, what was it like seeing it last night finally all put together?

    YOO: It’s really interesting. I’ve never done a full on horror movie. I found it interesting. I’ve done scare stuff in the past but when you know a scare is coming it’s kind of, it comes sort of as a intellectual exercise so it’s hard to tell. I’m not really sure and curious to know how editors and directors and such of horror films put movies together because if you are not scared by yourself, what’s the mathematics of what scares a person? People were being scared around me and so I was like, “OK…” It’s a really odd experience.

    CS: I was reading a little of what happened on the set and found out that your first day on the set came after you had your appendix taken out.

    YOO: Yeah, I actually had a bit of a complication from appendix surgery from years ago and so it was just something that acted up and was at the Kayne concert and I thought I don’t feel good. So it’s basically the equivalent of having appendicitis again. Brutal to have that twice in your life. I went the morning after and called my cast mate Arlen Escarpeta at 8:30 or 9:00 in the morning and said, “Hey, I think you need to take me to the hospital.” So he was like, “OK, I’m coming.And then the docs said, “You need surgery.”

    I initially thought it was going to be schedule prohibitive of me doing this movie but give all credit to Platinum Dunes and everyone in the film and Marcus, and Brand, Andrew and Michael over at Platinum Dunes and everybody. They wanted me to stay on the film so they filled the whole schedule around so I could have time off and I came back on set 10 days after surgery or something like that and started shooting again. So it was pretty cool. I did a fair amount of the movie. My own little trivia question is more like how much of the movie did I do? But I did a fair amount of the movie with 18 staples so it was a pretty interesting experience.

    CS: Based on that, there is a lot of wiggling on your part. You get a little physical with Jason.

    YOO: Yeah, if you could have seen ““ I guess what a horror movie is is to see the expressions of my producers every time ““ I did a lot of falls and stuff and did that on purpose and I didn’t really them I was going to do it until I started doing it. And people thought I should say hey, I might fall here. The first time I would do it in rehearsal or do it in a take people were like, “Cut, cut, cut. Are you OK?” And I’m like, “Really, I’m OK. I’m doing that on purpose. Don’t. That’s a good take.”

    So people would just hold their breath. I would freak them out like maybe I should have given them an advanced warning. Andrew Form, one of our producers, would say I was giving him a heart attack every time you do that. But sometimes, and I always feel like, getting to do what we do is a gift so you just have to have fun with it and don’t worry about anything else and you often don’t want to come back and not be doing my job. When I did my scene with Jason they were saying just kind of push him in the wall and mess him up and Derek and I…we were doing the scene and did a couple of takes and it didn’t feel like it was working and I said to him “Can you just push me into the wall?” and he said, “Are you are asking me if that is physically possible? Come on. I could do that with one arm.” So, I said, “OK, do it.”

    And then he threw me into the wall and everyone was, “Whoa!” Because it looked real, right?

    CS: One of the things that makes this movie so great is that it does. It feels brutal.

    YOO: Yeah. I felt like that too, even if you know what’s coming or not, is the brutality of it. There were definitely scenes ““ there were scenes that surprised me and I don’t scare easily in general ““ but there were scenes where people were dying and the first couple of times you could hear the whole theater going, ah, ah, ah, oh, oh, oh. I think my character landed the biggest one of those.

    CS: And well deserved because I was going to tell you when it does happen, and I’m not going to ruin anything for anybody, but it’s definitely one that caused a lot of reaction from the crowd.

    YOO: Can I ask you what was the audience like where you were seeing it? Was it critics?

    CS: No, it was a little bit of both. Very big theater. Maybe a dozen or so critics and maybe 100-200 regular fans.

    YOO: Awesome. Awesome. It’s really interesting to see ““ a bunch of us are trying to see opening night screenings Friday ““ just to see what’s that like. The photographers at the premiere were wearing Jason masks. I was recently traveling out of the country and anywhere I went people knew Friday the 13th. They couldn’t speak any English at all and I’d say Friday the 13th in their language and they would say “Jason”, “hockey mask” and it’s incredible. So, I’m really curious to see what opening night audiences will be like for this movie. Should be a lot of fun.

    CS: I think, genuinely, and I’m being honest, it does count as one of the best entries into the series because it takes out the goofiness and the high sheen of the previous entries.

    YOO: Like what?

    CS: I’m thinking when he kicks over the boom-box in JASON TAKES MANHATTAN.

    (Laughs)

    YOO: You know the whole story about Friday the 13th is about where the hockey mask came from. It was only thing they could find to cover his head up. They lost the original cover they were using. It was a total accident. So, the whole series, the original, it’s amazing the cultural credit it has because there’s, and no disrespect to the filmmakers, but there’s a lot of on-the-fly patching things together in that original series so I think the plan they had over at New Line and Platinum Dunes was that, “Hey, we have this thing that everybody is so part of our sub-cultural sub-conscious but never been done well.”

    I’m not sure what well is but, and you’re probably thinking what the heck am I talking about, this is not going to compete for an Oscar, but it’s a fun, if I may say, it’s a really fun ride.

    CS: It absolutely is. You have Marcus directing and he did a great job of bringing back Texas Chainsaw but when you first initially got around this project, was it, and it’s OK to be honest to say a job is a job and I’ll take it, “I’ll do it” but were there any reservations on your part that it was not going to live up to what people were hoping it was in that this was going to be hopefully a straight up horror movie?

    YOO: Well, I actually took my time thinking of it before getting on board the project. I went back and watched Marcus’s Texas Chainsaw and enjoyed the hell out of it. I was invited to take a look at the script which they were keeping under lockdown over at the Platinum Dunes offices and you roll up and there’s Transformers all over the place and all these posters and it was, I should have never asked the guys if this was done on purpose but they were like, here, why don’t you go take this script and go read it in Andrew’s office. And the office is just covered in mock-ups in pre-production art, costume posters, all this Friday the 13th stuff ““ all over the room. I was like, wow, this is Friday, the f’n 13th. Wow! And I was like, “If you’re going to do a horror movie, this is the way to go.And it made sense from the beginning, Andrew, Marcus, Brad, everybody were like, we say sex, drugs, and Jason Voorhees. Bring back that kind of horror movie they stopped making in the early 80’s. You get the ones that are totally gruesome then you get all the iterations of the Scream genre and the Japanese and Korean horror remakes where it’s all atmospheric. But Friday the 13th is kind of like a theme park and that was the goal and hopefully it delivers.

    When we were making it we were in Austin, Texas, one of the best places on earth and we said, “Let’s just have fun.And one of the good things about having surgery while you are shooting is that it really puts things ““ makes things very simple ““ I just had a serious health issue which is now past, and this thing we do is just fun. So I had such a blast.

    CS: I have to know, did you ever stand along side Jason at the craft services table, with him in full regalia?

    YOO: Yeah! Derek and I didn’t shoot a lot of scenes together. We didn’t actually work together for the first month and so we were all hanging out off set and then we would shoot two sets at the same time on stage and we would kick it. Derek is genuinely ““ and I don’t know if I should tell people this because I don’t want to ruin their experience at the film ““ but he’s a genuinely a wonderful human being and hilarious and actually a riot to work with. He will make you laugh with his mask on right before you are about to do a take and then they call “action” and you’re laughing and like, “I hate you.”

    (Laughs)

    “First of all, you ruined me. I can’t do the scene.” It’s interesting. I think maybe it’s best to meet Derek after you’ve seen Friday the 13th. The guy is a specimen. A physical specimen. He’s about 6’7″, maybe 270. He literally could chuck me with one arm, but just a genuine and hilarious human being.

    CS: I saw him last year at Comic-Con when I previewed the footage. It was just sick. It was great when they showed it and Derek seems to know how to make Jason seem more than what he is.

    YOO: Absolutely. We had such a good time working together. Last night I meant to tell him ““ I’m not sure I ever told him ““ that there’s this thing about my death scene with Jason where people say it’s just crazy with this certain thing I’m doing and I basically got ““ Derek and I were riffing between takes and he said this one thing and made me think of this other thing and I tried to do something in the take but it totally failed but in trying to do it, it made the take longer than it was meant to so I died for a really long time and it got really messy, my accident, not intentional at all. I was trying to do something and it wasn’t working but somehow my failure made it a keeper take. I love that how movies and scenes sometimes weird things happen. You’re trying to do something and makes this other thing happen which is what should have happened and everything comes together by mistakes.

    CS: How dis that work out, doing your death scene – When are you blocking it out and is it tightly choreographed? I ask because sometimes it looks like people are flopping around, you in particular, like a fish.

    YOO: It’s very highly choreographed. I don’t know about all actors but half of why I got into this whole crazy business. I remember being in Disturbia I get hit with a bat. I got to do everything except for, David Morse’s character hits me so hard that they wind up having a stunt guy flip over and fall to the ground and I’m watching that and said, I can totally do that. So I fell over the fence and stuff and said, “Why can’t I do that? I can totally do that.” And they said, “Uh, what are we going to do if you break something?So I always ask to do as much of that stuff as possible because I get such a kick out of it. It’s like playing when you were a kid. You get to mark it all the way through. You play choreographer. We had a lot of fun. You know my death scene came up the day of. There was no blocking. Most of the death’s you have a blocking rehearsal earlier on some day you weren’t shooting and work out the kinks. And you show up the day of and just agree on realities of the day and the space and schedule of shooting and everything but we didn’t even have the set built and second of all in the original script you don’t see me die on screen. Somewhere along the line they said, “That’s stupid. Why are we not showing that?And so, it was just back and forth and tossing ideas at the brain trust and then the day of we come in in the morning and they say, we got it.

    (Laughs)

    And they told me, “Now we just have to figure out how to make this work by 2:00 this afternoon.And, of course, we’re shooting other scenes. The special effects dept ““ Scott Stoddard is amazing does all the fake heads and amazing stuff and onset blood ““ very little computer CGI stuff. It’s old school, well done effects. So he had to come up with how it all was going to be done by 2:00 in the afternoon. He had basically 6 hours and we showed up on set and looking at the basic general idea and the tool shed and said, “What if it was over here, and that was over there….” We just kind of made it up. It was really fun. It’s really like when you are 7 years old and say, “No, I stabbed you, you’re dead. Honestly. This is a sword and you are honestly dead.” It’s just that sort of thing and I loved that when I was a kid. The one difference is that you have to get used to being covered in fake blood which is not comfortable after the third hour.

    (Laughs)

    CS: Well, in order to get his up by Friday I have to cut it short but I definitely want to end with a question. Looking back at your experience, seeing the film finished on the screen last night, what did you take away with the nature of what Jason represents to movie history?

    YOO: I think of Jason as the id…No, not really. I can’t intellectualize what I hope is a fun movie. I don’t know when that kind of horror film really came in, whether it was originally Halloween or whatnot, but I think it is the kind of movie that titillates people in a good and healthy way. Like scaring the pants off of you is sometimes good for your general well being. And Jason is the boogey man that you know you are going to enjoy being frightened of. He’s not trying to teach you anything. He’s not trying to scare you for any reason other than for you to have a good time. And hopefully that’s what we are putting in a box and giving people for Valentine’s Day.

    (Laughs)
    —————————–
    And now, for those still reading, who would like to win some FRIDAY THE 13TH swag? I have 6 FRIDAY THE 13TH branded hoodies to give away and if you’re interested in winning just jot me a note at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com and just write somewhere in that e-mail what your favorite entry is of this series. These things are L and XL, have a red little swath on the front saying FRIDAY THE 13TH and a pimp looking Jason mask that will always be looking behind you. They’re pretty pimp so big thanks to the sponsors who tossed some my way.

  • Trailer Park: A Donkey Punch and A Slap From Danny Boyle

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    I’m awesome. I wrote a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight”right HERE for free.

    And now, you can follow me on Twitter. Find me here, my oh so original name on the thing is Stipp so come on and follow my stray ramblings.

    I swear this is my last time pimping my appearance in a podcast. For now, anyway.

    The fine lads over at Screen Geeks had me on for their Most Anticipated Films of 2009 show and, thankfully, they hadn’t discovered how much of a charlatan I am before letting me shout out such gems as G.I. JOE (If you’re a fan of the 80’s series by Larry Hama run, do not walk, to IDW’s new series that has brought a bit of nostalgia to my pull box.) and FRIDAY THE 13TH. These chaps are top shelf and I thank them one more time for having me on.

    [display_podcast]

    Now, instead of letting pundits and blowhards get their soundbites on CNN without any informed discussion about the allegations surrounding Danny Boyle’s SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE as it pertains to the man’s filming of the movie Mr. Boyle decided to defend his film and thankfully he comes out swinging. I wouldn’t normally run this statement from Danny and Co. but my time with him a couple of months ago was genuinely exhilarating; his gregariousness, his excitement and overall joy at just being in some hellhole in Arizona talking to some no name web journalist left an impression.

    What follows is an answer to those out there in the ephemera who are taking Boyle to task, ignorantly, for what they perceive as bad behavior on his part as he made his film in India.

    FILMMAKERS STATEMENT:

    From the moment that we hired them and long before the press became interested in this story, we have paid painstaking and considered attention to how Azhar and Rubina’s involvement in the film could be of lasting benefit to them over and above the payment they received for their work.

    The children had never attended school, and in consultation with their parents we agreed that this would be our priority. Since June 2008 and at our expense, both kids have been attending school and they are flourishing under the tutelage of their dedicated and committed teachers. Financial resources have been made available for their education until they are 18. We were delighted to see them progressing well when we visited their school and met with their teachers last week.

    In addition to their educational requirements, a fund is in place to meet their basic living costs, health care and any other emergencies. Furthermore, as an incentive for them to continue to attend school a substantial lump sum will be released to each child when they complete their studies. Taking into account all of the children’s circumstances we believe that this is the right course of action.

    Since putting in place these arrangements more than 12 months ago we have never sought to publicize them, and we are doing so now only in response to the questions raised recently in the press. We trust that the matter can now be put to bed, and we would request that the media respect the children’s privacy at this formative time in their lives.

    – – Danny Boyle and Christian Colson

    DISTRIBUTORS STATEMENT:

    The welfare of Azhar and Rubina has always been a top priority for everyone involved with Slumdog Millionaire. A plan has been in place for over 12 months to ensure that their experience working on Slumdog Millionaire would be of long term benefit. For 30 days work, the children were paid three times the average local annual adult salary. Last year after completing filming, they were enrolled in school for the first time and a fund was established for their future welfare, which they will receive if they are still in school when they turn 18. Due to the exposure and potential jeopardy created by the unwarranted press attention, we are looking into additional measures to protect Azhar and Rubina and their families. We are extremely proud of this film, and proud of the way our child actors have been treated.

    – – Fox Searchlight Pictures, Fox Star Studios, Pathe International

    Finally today, what follows here is a chat with Sian Breckin. She’s in a new thriller that is making some lo-fi rounds at the multiplexes and will be out on video in a couple of months called DONKEY PUNCH. For those who are unfamiliar with what this movie is about here is a short synopsis:

    After meeting at a nightclub in a Mediterranean resort, seven young adults decide to continue partying aboard a luxury yacht in the middle of the ocean. But when one of them dies in a freak accident the others argue about what to do, leading to a ruthless fight for survival.

    I have read a lot about the production of this film and was attracted to it for 2 reasons: 1. It was made by a first time director and 2. It was shot on the cheap. It isn’t the novelty so much as I am and have been endlessly fascinated by filmmakers who haven’t made much and want to make a splash without a whole lot of cash to do it. Reviews have been all over the board with this movie, and that doesn’t interest me so much as it does get in the way to the story, but when I was asked to speak to one of the film’s ensemble cast, Sian Breckin, I was in. She’s was a delight to talk to and, oddly enough, her filmography to those who live here in the U.S. equals 1 film. This one.

    I figured that would be just as good as any of a spot to begin our talk.

    CHRISTOPHER STIPP: You’ve made it really hard on me to try to find any kind of question to ask of you based on your many films.

    SIAN BRECKIN: What do you mean?

    CS: Apart from Donkey Punch ““ I don’t know where else or what else you’ve been in. It makes a hard interview.

    BRECKIN: Oh, OK. Lots of theater in London.

    And then lots of television in England on the BBC and ITV networks which are the main tunnels in England, but this is the first time I’ve come to LA or America I suppose because Donkey Punch has just come out here.

    CS: Learning about this film I found out that it was made for a million pounds, it was really low budget when compared to some movies of its kind.

    BRECKIN: I think it was 800 thousand or something. It was nothing.

    CS: Nothing at all.

    BRECKIN: It’s incredible that I’m here to be honest with you.

    CS: Then how did you make that transition? What I know about you here is that this is basically your first movie and this is the first thing you have been in to me here, someone being from the states. How did you make that leap or why did you want to make that leap from theater to film?

    BRECKIN: It was the first thing I did on screen and I think I had watched, have you seen DEAD MAN’S SHOES, which is a British film with Paddy Considine who has been in a few American things which was made by Warp Films and Warp Films sent the script out for Donkey Punch and they made really challenging films I suppose and they are not just pleasing the right wing middle class audience. They are making something I believe in.

    So when I got the script from Warp I thought this was a company I really wanted to work with and they had made some interesting things I liked. So when I read the script I really identified with the characters and with Lisa particularly and then I thought this was a great opportunity to create someone very believable in a messed up situation.

    CS: Right. And I think one of the things that a lot of people, these post modern critiques of horror film, is the helpless female. Looking at this, did you look with an eye towards is this person believable or she is another female trope of “Is she going to break a leg, fall down?”

    (Laughs)

    BRECKIN: I don’t think she’s a helpless female because she’s, particularly for the sex scenes, she’s completely in control. She’s doesn’t get Marcus, the boy she wants, so she fell for somebody else and then when Bluey suggests that Josh gets involved she very much in control and on holiday having a fantastic time and I think she’s a powerful woman who is very sexually confident. And, as an actress I have to think, “OK what are my paranoias and my insecurities?” But they are not relevant because Lisa is very much in control and is having a fantastic holiday and I have to match that. And I thought that was empowering to play rather than thinking of her as a helpless female. I don’t think at any point she’s helpless.

    CS: No, absolutely not. And this film I think challenges that idea. The aim of that question was you see a lot of horror movies where women are relegated to the screaming role. This brought something a little different to the idea.

    BRECKIN: Well, good. I’m glad. Because the women are really strong. There’s one woman that gives up the ghost at one point and she feels she can’t carry on, but I mean I think that Lisa realizes that she doesn’t need Nichola’s character, she plays Tammi. So there are strong women who are in control I guess.

    CS: To that point of the production of the film, I’m always curious when I’m talking to someone who has made a thriller/slash horror film. About the very mundane parts of making a horror film…I read in some interview with you that you were wet, you were cold, really wasn’t conducive for abject horror.

    BRECKIN: Yeah.

    CS: How is that process of actually having to muster up the fortitude to look scared and panicked when in fact it’s rather so planned out and staged?

    BRECKIN: I think that maybe Donkey Punch is different because it was shot in 24 days and rather than having to fly in and fly out for my scenes we were flown in at the same time and spent 6 weeks together. The girls lived in a flat together and it felt very much like a lot of the rehearsing ““ we were working all the time ““ living together we were establishing our relationship and stuff that could have been mundane wasn’t. When you felt terrified ““ I just had the fun stuff ““ but I think they did feel claustrophobic on the boat which was out to sea and there were a lot of people on the boat and you couldn’t get off that. In the beginning we had a lot of fun and really worked very hard and played really hard, that’s the reality but what we were going through was reflected in the film.

    CS: One of those things about it and pointing back to one of those things I’ve read about the production of the film, that Ollie, who is a first time film director….

    BRECKIN: Yea, that’s right….which is amazing.

    CS: How was that?

    BRECKIN: It was amazing because he was very interested in the actors and what we could bring to our characters and wasn’t exclusive with the script. He had his script and had an idea at least of what he wanted and then would let us give as much input as we could, what we wanted to create for the film, which for my first time on screen was incredible because I felt very loose and very free with what I could bring to the film rather than restricted by someone who knew more.

    CS: And how was that coming from the theater ““ the performance you would give ““ given the film as opposed to the theater? Is it more nuanced? Do you find yourself falling back into the ideas of theater acting? Making things grandiose? Or did you find there was an adjustment period?

    BRECKIN: It’s incredibly different. I think I did go through an adjustment period and when I watch the film and know how we filmed in sequence, I can tell where I am much more used to the camera and where I’m not. And when you are on the stage and used to an audience which is far away from you and to do something on the screen, everything you do is smaller and much more focused and intense and it took me a while to get used to that.
    But, I knew who Lisa was and I knew what I wanted to portray and I worked with 6 other actors who had worked on film before and were young and I really learned a lot from them and watching them all the time. Because Ollie was new he let me on the set a lot to watch what was going on and I felt it was OK for me to learn and I did learn a hell of a lot doing that film.

    CS: And you mentioned working with other actors, ensemble acting…

    BRECKIN: Just thinking in terms when you work on a script for theater you maybe spend four or maybe two weeks before you start rehearsing and researching the character ““ how they walk, what they wear, what kind of person they are and because I came from that training background, I brought that into the film and I think again, that was the thing that carried me through. I was very clear of who my character was. Maybe I wasn’t so skilled at working on camera but I was very clear on what I wanted to achieve and I think that helped me through.

    CS: And you mentioned working with the other actors, ensemble acting. You are not the only person up there. This isn’t a movie with one or two people. How was that? You are not just acting by yourself but having to act within these other people.

    BRECKIN: It was amazing. I felt really lucky to have that experience. The whole thing was an ensemble feel to it and it just meant I could learn from the experience from the other actors and they were very accepting into the things that I brought to it. And it was about a group of young people having a lot of fun. And that’s great isn’t it? For a job – go out and have fun. Yeah, I was really lucky.

    CS: They say to never shoot on water. It’s one of the first things they say…

    BRECKIN: Yeah, that’s true. That water that we jump into was freezing cold and we had to pretend it was boiling and we’re having a wonderful time. That was really tough because it wasn’t. It was very cold.

    CS: Yeah, talk about that. I read that the divers that had to be in there with you got hypothermia.

    BRECKIN: Yeah, hypothermia, checking for jellyfish and the tide and current was really strong and you are trying to look like this is great, we’re having a lovely time. Not “Oh my god, there’s a jellyfish and it’s really freezing” but I guess that’s the part that makes you a tougher actor.

    CS: Being on the boat, you mentioned it being very claustrophobic. That’s one of the hardest things to do is make a movie in such a confined space. Talking with Ollie, how did he explain that he was going to make something so thrilling and so horrifying in such a tight, confined area?

    BRECKIN: I’m not involved in that as much. My part on the boat is not as claustrophobic. I don’t know that he explained to the other actors. They would do night shoots and of course they were tired and stressed shooting on the boat just helped added to the fear and experience and I think it was a positive thing. I don’t think it was something he ever explained. We got on the boat on the first day of rehearsal and we knew then, “Oh my god ““ we’re out in the middle of the ocean.I think it was very trying at times but I think everyone is happy with the end product. We all contributed to what we created in the end I guess.

    CS: Looking back at this, I’m interested to know if you’ve seen your own work and whether you watch it and see imperfections that you might ““ some people look at themselves and don’t want to see what they’ve done on screen ““ anything you would have done differently?

    BRECKIN: Sure. This is my first screen experience. So for me, to watch it was…different ““ I’ve never seen myself on screen and then I’ve watched it maybe about 12 times in different screenings and with different audiences and the main thing for me is watching the other actors and learning from them and thinking what works and what doesn’t and hopefully I’m just bringing something truthful to the character that you can like…I think that’s important for Lisa…and something you can believe in ““ that’s my main goal. There are bits that I’m incredibly proud of and bits that I think are awful and I would change that but I’m only 26 and it’s all about experience and learning from that and everything that I’ve done.

    CS: I know our time is short but I want to ask one more question and that’s seeing what I know ““ obviously me being from America I only see one thing that you’ve done here so basically in my eyes this is my first introduction to you. You now made yourself on a world stage and said, “This is who I am.” How do you look toward the future and what you want to do going from here?

    BRECKIN: The thing that Donkey Punch as brought me is introduced me to a lot of companies that I’ve always watched their movies and thought I would love to work with them. And that’s British companies and now because Donkey Punch is being publicized in America it has allowed me to come out here and hopefully I can establish myself out here. I think American television is fantastic and would love to be involved in that and I think I’m young and I don’t know how ““ I think of this in terms of longevity ““ could involve different things ““ could involve acting, directing, producing but learning as I go along.

  • Trailer Park: FRIDAY THE 13TH and CONFESSIONS OF A SHOPAHOLIC – Reviewed

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    I’m awesome. I wrote a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight”right HERE for free.

    And now, you can follow me on Twitter. Find me here, my oh so original name on the thing is Stipp so come on and follow my stray ramblings.

    CONFESSIONS OF A SHOPAHOLIC – REVIEW

    For anyone wanting to know the bottom line on this film here, verbatim, are the notes I sent to the studio rep about the movie:

    “I thought the movie was formulaic, the writing was pretty weak and a little derivative but I thought Isla Fisher was positively effervescent and bubbly. She performed well in the role that she was given with other standouts being Krysten Ritter, who does Winona Ryder better than Winona Ryder, and Fred Armisen who I wished was given more to do. Overall, a movie that will positively work well with women who will gravitate towards the female-friendly material.”

    Those still sticking around to read my additional thoughts on the movie I have to start by saying producer Jerry Bruckheimer was brilliant, getting in on this action. A man who usually has more to do with guns and bombs than he does with pantyhose and bombshells obviously saw something worth producing in a movie that is insipidly simple in its construction and wretchedly executed from the standpoint that there is no thinking involved at all by those in attendance. He saw, or at least I think he did, that there was a story that a large swath of the population not usually served by his usual fare deserved to hear because of what’s popular right now in our female society’s zeitgeist. It’s not a polemic on Middle Eastern relations, it’s a treatise on how one broke woman deals with shopping a lot, wants to write for a fashion magazine and then ends up falling in love.

    That’s it. There’s nothing else you need to know about the film because it’s all filler and fodder to push along the 3 basic tenants of debt, shopping and fictionalized love. Isla Fisher, who plays Rebecca Bloomwood, absolutely shines in a role that requires nothing more than to be endearing, funny and charming. And she does it especially well when you consider how painful some other actresses have tried to pull this off in the pantheon of vapid female romantic comedy leads. Isla is a delight every single time she is on the screen and what’s impressive is that she was able to be compelling in her turn as a down-on-her-luck (self-inflicted down-on-her-luck, natch) writer who yearns to be part of the fashion world by writing for a prestigious magazine dedicated to all things glamorous. Her best friend, Suze (Krysten Ritter), is amazing insofar that, like I mentioned, oozes Wynona Rider all over her face but she manages to radiate the kind of peace and love that even Ringo Starr wouldn’t be able to resist autographing; she’s a delight.

    After a series of wacky coincidences and unbelievable opportunities that defy any sense of logic, she becomes a lightning rod of attention for a staid and stuffy financial publication by writing a female-centric column focused on dumbing down complex issues dealing with money in a cheeky fashion. Her editor, Luke Brandon (played by the affable and likable Hugh Dancy), takes a fancy to this young wordsmith and the two end up playing the hackneyed game of girl likes boy, boy likes someone else, boy ends up liking girl.

    Apart from these written elements there is an inordinate amount of slapstick. From fighting over boots at an exclusive sale of couture clothing to Isla actually putting palm to face of a foreigner from Finland at a cocktail party there is more to keep the ladies laughing from start to finish. And that’s the other thing. The movie appeals to women for reasons that should be abundantly clear when you understand that this movie is not predicated on looking at love from the perspective of that other fashion-centric movie, SEX AND THE CITY, as if you were to compare the two SEX would be considered an introverted examination of amour, this film just wants to be easy breezy.

    There is a sub-plot of Isla dealing with a hard-nosed debt collector throughout the film as she avoids his calls, his visits and, ultimately, the fallout was a pleasant diversion that actually pays off at a pivotal moment in the film and there’s no denying that all the roles that are on the screen are used to their greatest potential. It’s not to say that all the performances are great or particularly pleasant, I wish there was more done with Fred Armisen who turns in a sublime and comical performance as Dancy’s boss, but there isn’t any long, drawn out moments that can at times disrupt the quick flow to these comedies.

    In sum, this isn’t a movie I will ever purchase or pay to see again. I think the strongest comment I can make is that it’s a pleasant diversion to some of the fare out there that this could have been a lot worse if not for Isla Fisher. Fisher is the reason why this movie excels and you cannot help but notice that she is a comedic talent who actually manages to delight.

    FRIDAY THE 13TH – REVIEW

    I’m not one to begin with a quote so I apologize in advance. It’s gauche, I know that, I hate it when I see it in other publications, but it’s completely appropriate and relevant to what follows. It comes from SUMMER SCHOOL:

    Dave: Have you seen the movie, Texas Chainsaw Massacre?

    Anna-Maria: No. It is good?

    Dave: Oh, I’ve got to tell you, I love this film. It had passion and a plucky spirit. And, the characters had integrity, like when Leatherface went on that strict diet of human flesh, he had to cut out chicken and fish completely.

    Francis “Chainsaw” Grimp: Dave, I agree with you. I’ll go a step further, sure Leatherface, he wore a mask made out of human skin, and he hung people on meat-hooks, but hey, we’ve all got quirks, I got ’em, you’ve got ’em Dave, that’s what makes this character so, so compelling. Thumbs up for me.

    Thumbs up, indeed.

    FRIDAY THE 13th absolutely deserves to be hugged and coddled by those wanting to go back to the days when horror meant killing, horror meant sparking up a spliff and getting nuts with your lady friend and when horror meant Jason was actually menacing.

    One thing that Marcus Nispel deserves credit for as director on this film is knowing what this property used to mean to those who were weaned on a hearty diet of straight-forward hack/slash films in the 80’s and why it was absolutely time to deconstruct the deconstructors that brought us the SCREAM franchise. Damian Shannon and Mark Swift as writers deserve equal credit for making a movie that walks that fine line of knowing what makes good horror good and bad horror, well, unwatchable. One of the biggest compliments you can give a movie like this, then, is that it managed to actually thrill and excite without it ever feeling goofy or having too high a polish.

    When you look at the pretty teen entries in the 90’s (I KNOW WHAT YOU DID LAST SUMMER, SCREAM, FINAL DESTINATION, HALLOWEEN H20, et al.) the clean and clear cinematography put a polish on things stuck out a frayed thread that you wish you could just unravel. These movies are supposed to be gritty, overexposed at times, dirty. Now, while Marcus’ previous reboot of TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE wasn’t deserving of any great praise overall he at least got the atmosphere right. And he gets it right in this film.

    From the start we push right through some of the basic tenants of what made Jason, well, Jason. He sees his mom beheaded from afar in a flashback sequence, drenched in blackness and rain, which takes all of 5 minutes. Whereas some would love to dwell on this moment Marcus and Co. just plow through this information and you can feel this is a story that is going to move at a quick clip. When we get into the actual narrative we’re led to believe that a pack of kids who are off wandering around, backpacks in tow, looking for a stash of marijuana that has been planted somewhere deep in the recesses of tall grass, tall trees, far away from humanity, the backwoods. It’s effective in setting up of how distant all these events are taking place, how susceptible they are to the natural environs or any other danger that will fall upon them. Cell phones don’t work here either, natch.

    The first pre-act, an extended moment really, of the kids looking for a plantation full of weed takes up a solid 15 minutes and is really a definitive look at how the rest of the film will unfold. We’ve got ourselves a story that knows how to pace itself, how to generate good tension with its characters as we all wait for the killing to go full throttle and how to execute its executions.

    I have to hand it to the filmmakers in that they’ve properly figured out the proportions of sex, drugs and violence. The first two kind of take care of themselves, I think Jeffrey Wells won’t want for pictures of these ladies, but the latter was done with a little creativity. It’s hard not to be able and spoil things with descriptions of how there were some quality kills at the outset but it is sufficient to explain that there are messy ways to go here; America Olivio and Jonathan Sadowski both deserve a golf clap for setting things off in the right manner and it’s absolutely terrifying to see Jason have a spring in his step as the conversation, come Monday, will probably revolve around slow lumbering Jason versus Olympic sprinter Jason. I like the fast moving one because you can really feel the physics behind every machete hack and every ax toss.

    As we settle into the story proper I was struck by the pacing. Whereas in the other entries you had Jason mostly attacking people in the night (there are exceptions to this) Jason is not relegated to being the boogie man who only strikes at night. As judged by the preview you do have Jason coming out to terrorize some young swimmer and this only enhances the experience in that you are left to wonder where and when he might strike.

    The main players in this feature, Jared Padalecki (playing Clay Miller) and Danielle Panabaker (playing Jenna) were solid entries as the focus of this film. The two of them are relatively unknowns, most everyone in this film are unknowns, and again this only enhances the experience as you subconsciously are left wondering who is going to be spared and who’s going to die next. Thankfully this movie doesn’t play favorites and this is, perhaps, the film’s greatest advantage. Whereas other films in the 90’s played with young actors on the bubble you had some good beads on who was going to live and who was not. For the most part, this film keeps it all going as we traipse from one kill to another.

    However, I will mention that the Jason Lair is a little goofy and idiotic. Its presence was the one thing that kept this film from being absolutely great and took me out of the 3rd act somewhat. This area seemed awfully well-constructed, not to mention well-lit, for a man who is supposed to be a mentally deficient, homicidal maniac and it’s completely unbelievable in every regard. Also, its eventual use as we head home toward the ending is equally bizarre and logic defying but it does deserve a little credit for reasons that deserve to be seen to be believed.

    One of the other issues that are raised when reviewing a horror movie is that you run in to a lot of things that are simply too goofy to try and be eloquent about: the drug use; the promiscuity; the nudity; the bad choices; and, subsequently, the bad decisions don’t really deserve to be scrutinized in the conventional sense. These elements made good horror films good then and it certainly makes it good now. To pick apart at these things would only serve to unravel the tight noose that is wrapped around your expectations for what you hope this movie will deliver. You go into this film wishing for these things and, if you’re really a fan of the genre, you hope things honor its heritage and you hope its fun. Derek Mears delivers an excellent, reenergized Jason Voorhees and even though there is nothing more to do than to act menacing his performance competes with that of C.J. Graham from FRIDAY THE 13TH PART VI. I am recusing any talk of the subtleties of Derek’s performance as really any talk beyond his form would just spoil the goodness of his heinousness with how he dispatches his victims to the afterlife.

    This movie delivers on delivering a solid horror experience with its thrilling pacing and dark atmosphere. Terror seems to be around many corners and it deserves credit for not only erasing the awfulness and shame the sequels have inflicted on the more respectable entries into this much maligned franchise. There is nothing intellectual going on in these movies and I think this accounts for why many have failed to “get it” when it comes to what makes these good movies. It’s about nudity, about gettin’ high and about how people are gonna die. And this movie delivers on all three. Chainsaw and Dave would have absolutely given this a thumbs-up.

    And now, for those still reading, who would like to win some FRIDAY THE 13TH swag? I have 6 FRIDAY THE 13TH branded hoodies to give away and if you’re interested in winning just jot me a note at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com and just write somewhere in that e-mail what your favorite entry is of this series. These things are L and XL, have a red little swath on the front saying FRIDAY THE 13TH and a pimp looking Jason mask that will always be looking behind you. They’re pretty pimp so big thanks to the sponsors who tossed some my way.

  • Trailer Park: CHOCOLATE DVD Giveaway

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    I’m awesome. I wrote a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

    And now, you can follow me on Twitter. Find me here, my oh so original name on the thing is Stipp so come on and follow my stray ramblings.

    I loved this film.

    It’s everything that you could want in a season when there isn’t going to be anything this exciting until we get into the summer months.

    I know I usually run DVD Giveaways in this space without much regard to the film but CHOCOLATE is the exception to the rule in that I pursued the opportunity to have a couple copies for our site to give to our readers because I dug it as much as I did.

    As well, I think the studio, Magnolia, deserves a tremendous amount of credit in figuring out that these kinds of films deserve to be seen by everyone who isn’t in the position like myself to preview and then champion these releases. The time has absolutely come to think of a way people can get enthused about a movie that they’ve never heard about and not worry that such a genre pic won’t be coming to their town because they live in Bumbleweed, AK because they will have multiple points of entry. You can see it theaters, you can get it through HDNet Ultra VOD and now DVD or Blu-Ray. There is no excuse anymore for anyone to miss this and huzzah to Magnolia for being on the vanguard of film distrubution in the 21st century.

    I’ve got 2 copies to give out and in order to win you’ve got to do 2 things: 1. Send me a note to Christopher_Stipp@Yahoo.com and 2. Write anywhere in the e-mail of who was the titular actor of Ong Bak. (I want these to go to some fans of the genre…)

    CHOCOLATE is available on DVD and HDNet Ultra VOD Tuesday, February 10 from Magnet Releasing…

    Prachya Pinkaew, director of Ong Bak: The Thai Warrior, returns with CHOCOLATE, an explosive new martial arts masterpiece starring his new protégé, “Jija” Yanin Vismistananda, who spent five years training for the role. Jija plays Zen, a young autistic girl who grows up next to a Muay Thai boxing studio and is raised on a steady diet of chocolate and marathon viewings of Tony Jaa and Bruce Lee films. Zen’s father, a Japanese gangster, has been driven out of the country by a rival Thai gang, so her mother has been forced to raise her alone.

    It becomes clear over time that Zen has miraculously absorbed formidable Muay Thai techniques from watching the boxers next door and repeated viewings of martial arts classics. When Zen’s mother is diagnosed with cancer and the cost of treatments prove overwhelming for the family, Zen sets out with her cousin on a violent mission to collect debts from the corrupt gangsters that owe her mother money.

    Featuring death-defying stunts and a charming newcomer who is sure to blow the minds of martial arts fans everywhere, CHOCOLATE represents Prachya’s proper follow-up to the smash success of Ong Bak.

  • Trailer Park: HE’S JUST NOT THAT INTO YOU and CHOCOLATE – Reviewed

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    I’m awesome. I wrote a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

    And now, you can follow me on Twitter. Find me here, my oh so original name on the thing is Stipp so come on and follow my stray ramblings.

    Before I turn you loose into Review City I was asked once again to be a part of the podcast over at Screen Geeks. I was there talking about some recent films and what was really the best to come out of last year. If you have some time, please check it out, download it, stream it. I am always flattered to be asked to be on that program and I am sure some day they will figure out how much of a fraud I am. Until that comes, please enjoy my nasally stylings.

    [display_podcast]

    CHOCOLATE – Review

    A lot of this film is very meta.

    What I have come to enjoy out of Tony Jaa films is his rubbery technique when it comes to inventive ways of kicking someone’s head in or how he is able to make his films watchable no matter how preposterous the plot. And, really, these films are not based on their depth so we’ve all bought into the idea that these films are more about the art of action than they are the art of dialog. This is important to realize as you watch CHOCOLATE, the latest from director Prachya Pinkaew and newcomer JeeJa Yanin.

    Apart from the amazing tale, if it is to be believed, that JeeJa gave up five years of her life preparing for this role this film is going to be the one movie that heralds a new standard in action films for 2009. Note well that I am not calling this film an action masterpiece but what I can say is that it is head and shoulders above any soft or weak action movie that has been put out there this year. JeeJa, playing the part of an autistic girl, Zen, who is weaned on action movies (Tony Jaa, natch) and chocolate (don’t over think the why) is arresting as a woman who paints the world in her own shades of colors. She lives in her own mental world and it is absolutely lays the logical foundation as to why she does what she does. An aside: her mother needs help with some medical treatment and the girl plays the part of bill collector as she collects on money owed the family. It’s so convenient but who cares, really?

    The meta of this film is that this is directed by Tony Jaa’s ONG BAK director, Pinkaew, and Zen’s own style of combat comes out of her consumption of Jaa’s films. This whole movie almost feels like a sequel to a Jaa film that everyone might say they’ve seen but this is completely original in the way it executes its action.

    The action moves are wonderfully captured on the screen while the physical odds and ends and detritus that all needed to be in place for these fight sequences to go off, not to mention exact placement of human beings in order to make all of these things happen, is impressive when you consider all the time it takes to get it right.

    I almost feel bad reviewing this film in a conventional sense in that this is not a film that can be “reviewed” in the usual sense as this movie is completely deserving of kudos and accolades on its technical prowess. Much in the same way that RUMBLE IN THE BRONX showed us exactly what we were going to get out of Jackie Chan, someone needs to apologize for all the RUSH HOURs, this is a demo reel of King Kong-ian proportions for what we can expect from JeeJa. As she was careening off the bodies of potential bringers of pain, inflicting physical abuse that even made me wince at times, comes to a head to a climatic scene with a cast of dozens that has to be seen to be believed. I am completely self-aware of this comment but I have to make it: Action never tasted so sweet as it does at the hands of JeeJa Yanin.

    I cannot recommend this movie enough as a winter season treat so I hope that you catch this either theatrtically or when it comes out on VOD or Blu-Ray on February 10th.

    HE’S JUST NOT THAT INTO YOU – Review

    I am a fan of romantic comedies.

    Much like some young men who fancy films with superheroes, explosions and bright lights, as I still do, I also have an affinity for well-crafted films that try and contain the very thing that drives almost every person whether they want to be cognizant of it or not: love.

    It’s a rough thing to try and be faithful to the feeling we get when we meet someone, are pursuing someone and what’s it’s like to finally be with that someone but there are those who are able to get it right. Look at Cameron Crowe’s SINGLES, a movie that melded humor with the suffering tribulations of a pack of people who just want love and to be loved. It’s still a benchmark I judge a lot of other films by when a movie wants to go down that road of mainstream treatise on the commonality of love. SAY ANYTHING, as well, shows how adept he was in taking a lot of that comedy out and laying bare the quietness of people looking to find something special.

    The problem with Ken Kwapis’ HE’S JUST NOT THAT INTO YOU, then, isn’t that there is a lack of understanding of why this genre exists it is the not so great material, the execution of said material and its shallowness/one-sidedness of most the cast that ensures this will not be allowed into the pantheon of good romantic comedies. And, as an aside, this film shares more with tragedy than it does hilarity so if you’re wondering whether there will be yuks and chuckles peppered throughout this film you will be sadly and horrifically surprised at the infidelity, cheating, lying, mean spiritedness and overall dour sheen of the film.

    For those unfamiliar with the plot here is the official synopsis: An all-star cast is featured in the stories of a group of interconnected, Baltimore-based twenty- and thirtysomethings as they navigate their various relationships from the shallow end of the dating pool through the deep, murky waters of married life. Trying to read the signs of the opposite sex, each hopes to be the exception to the “no exceptions” rule.

    One of the first problems with the film, from its printed promotion to its trailer, is that it’s trying to sell you on the idea that this is going to be an amusing romp into some soft territory. What I take issue with is that this movie is confused. It doesn’t know what it wants to be. Apart from Ken’s serviceable directing is his ineffectualness in getting anything compelling out of this material or its players. To put it in terms many would be able and understand this movie reads like a Robert Altman feature without the depth of its characters and feels like a bad Thirtysomething episode, its players looking fresh off the runways of Milan and completely unbelievable as forlorn romantics. What’s more is that the movie tries to shoehorn short scenes with actors who have nothing to do with the film’s content to try and talk amusingly about the pitfalls of love gone bad. These mini “interviews” feel disingenuous when you try and marry them to the movie’s overall story.

    And the stories! This movie spins yarns on top of sticks like plates, trying to keep them all going, and here is a run down of what each has to do with the other:

    Jennifer Connelly: Your everywoman. She seems nice enough in her role as a wife who is in the middle of renovating her home (metaphor alert!) but is having issues with her lying husband.

    Bradley Cooper: Connelly’s lying, cheating husband. He wants to get it on like Donkey Kong with Scarlett Johansson, an aspiring singer (thankfully, we’re not abused with her vocal talents) who pursues Bradley even after she realizes he’s married and is shocked and dejected when he doesn’t leave his wife for her.

    Scarlett Johansson: She plays a shallow tramp of a woman. She’s leading Kevin Connelly on as a sorta, kinda girlfriend.

    Kevin Connelly: Perhaps one of the best things about the film. He’s a guy just looking to make his way through life, trying to balance his professional and personal life. Goes on a date with Ginnifer Goodwin and doesn’t call her.

    Ginnifer Goodwin: The emotional tractor beam of low self-esteem in this movie. She depends on other people for her happiness for 90% of this movie and only, by the end, does she realize only she can make her own happiness. What a shock.

    Justin Long: Friend of both Kevin and personal mentor to Ginnifer of all the ways men like to treat women badly. If you’ve ever seen a film like this you’ll know how this will end and it does it miserably.

    Jennifer Aniston: Common law girlfriend to Ben Affleck of 7 years and conveniently decides in a timely fashion that, no, even though the two of them agreed not to get married ever, she does want to get married. She dumps him.

    Ben Affleck: A man who starts out being confident and emotionally stable ends up neutered by the end. That’s all you need to know.

    Drew Barrymore: A vortex of pathetic. From using MySpace to get a date (you can tell by this how old the film has been sitting on the shelf by how much this site gets mentioned. I’m surprised no one name drops Pets.com) to being a genuinely bad at gaging how regular people are supposed to fall in love.

    As you read the above I can tell you that this represents the major problem I had with this film: these characters are not believable, single-sided and they’re wickedly miserable. If I wanted misery I would just look at the relationships of people around me; I don’t go to the films to be reminded of the misery that real life doles out in ladles on a daily basis. The movie plods along, weighed down by its own moroseness, and once it thinks it wants to end things it can’t do it without seeming incredibly disingenuous.

    I can’t give away how all of this plays out but this is honestly a sad film. I can’t lay too much blame at Ken’s feet for a middling movie but the screenwriters managed to miss or intentionally ignore the reason why there could have been a great opportunity to make a movie where there was genuine comedy and genuine heartache. As it stands, this film wants to tell a couple of handfuls’ worth of stories and can’t keep them all going.

  • Trailer Park: Emma Stone

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    I’m awesome. I wrote a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

    And now, you can follow me on Twitter. Find me here, my oh so original name on the thing is Stipp so come on and follow my stray ramblings. The nice thing you should know is that I don’t machine gun blast with the number of tweets I put out there, I’m fairly mellow….

    As well, pick up the latest Geek Monthly magazine. I have an article profiling the antics of Kevin Pereira and Olivia Munn on Attack of the Show. You’ll only be able to witness my greatness or awfulness, depending on where you fall on the issue, for another week or so before I’m whisked off the shelf and replaced with next month’s issue.

    I dig being a part of the Screen Geeks podcast. For every week they have me on it’s nice to be able and actually verbalize what has been richocheting off in my head all week when it comes to what is the latest in film; it’s cathartic in a way.

    I know there are a megaton of podcasts devoted to what’s happening in film but how many of them have me in them? Only one, friends. If you have an inkling to listen to the lastest ramblings of a non-drunken idiot please give this a spin online or download it for your audio pleasure. This episode is devoted to the worst films of 2008 and it was an episode that just left me angry. Talking about what was wrong in cinema last year could only enrage a person and indeed it did. Hopefully some people will check it out and enjoy the Ray Romano-ish voice stylings of yours truly. As well, where else could you find Keifer Sutherland attacking a Christmas tree in a true drunken rage? In real life. It’s great.

    [display_podcast]

    THE ROCKER INTERVIEW

    This movie was damn terrible. It really was a painful experience to have to sit through this film. Strangulation by a plastic Ralph’s bag would provide for more entertainment than I got out of this beast.

    No knock to Jason Sudeikis, because this is the honest truth, but his parts in this film were the best thing about this motion picture. He’s a witty dude and knew how to make something out of his cliched, tired old character that we’ve seen dozens of times in pop culture. The other bright light was the light and airy Emma Stone. Quickly surpassing her peers as the go-to gal as a funny lady who can hold her own against her comedic male foils (Superbad being one, natch). Much like Sudeikis, she isn’t given much to do and that’s another crime that, thankfully, was punished by audiences everywhere unlucky enough to witness this waste of everyone’s time.

    This interview, which I have been holding onto like a Bob Dole’s Bic ballpoint, in a messianic death grip of sorts because I wanted *something* positive to come out of this experience, was even plagued by disaster: it was a roundtable. You had your usual suspects of film writers in the valley descend to a swanky hotel in Phoenix to talk to this native Arizonian, Lord knows I would have come down with food poisioning had I known that before I showed up (I’m still smarting from bailing on the Seann William Scott roundtable for ROLE MODELS but I’m not regretting having to parse through everyone else’s quotes just to get my stuff out of there) but oddly enough there was a representative from Spawn.com. For those who don’t know or are unfamiliar, Spawn is a comic book franchise built on the ginormous ego and talent of Todd McFarlane. I don’t begrudge the local boy (his empire squarely rests in a local suburb in Arizona) from doing what he does, I interviewed him to boot, but go ahead and look at the man’s site. It’s about Todd. All about Todd. I have no clue why I was jockeying for questions with a rep for Spawn.com but it is what it is and it’s why I really don’t like to be reminded of how bad I suck whenever I do a roundtable.

    THE ROCKER is coming out on DVD next Tuesday. And I hear that every purchase comes with a zip tie that you can fasten around your neck just in case you get too despondent after realizing you rented, or worse, purchased this film. For those brazen enough to actually wade through this interview I hope you see that even though there might be some harbored feelings that I genuinely, homogeneously suck at doing interviews I don’t stray afield into the land of Insipidness as some of these people. Be thankful…

    QUESTION: What was it like watching the movie with an audience? Did you get to do that before?

    [Ed. note – Yeah, these guys are really bringing the heat right out of the gate.]

    EMMA STONE: It was awesome. This was the second time I’ve seen it with an audience. The first time was CineVegas which was the film festival in Vegas but this was so cool because it’s my home town. It’s cool to be at the Esplanade. It was fun.

    QUESTION: It was cool to be at the Esplanade?

    [Ed. note – Fuck…me. Seriously? A follow up to this shitty question?]

    STONE: Houston’s. Morton’s. It was great.

    QUESTION: Do you have any resemblance to your character? Your character in the movie described yourself as kind of punk. Based on what I read, you like Beetles and Simon and Garfunkel, is there any sort of musical resemblance to you two?

    STONE: No. That’s what I liked about it. She felt different than me. She’s not a smiler and looks at the dark side of things more often and I’m a little more silver lining in my life so that’s what kind of drew me to it ““ especially in a comedy. Finding a character like that in a comedy that is so sardonic ““ a challenge of not smiling and not cracking jokes”¦

    QUESTION: Did you have to do a lot of research?

    STONE: Not really. She’s just a creation ““ she’s not too dark ““ she’s very teenage ““ teenage angst. I learned to play base ““ that was a big part of it because that’s where she puts all her passion.

    QUESTION: Did you pick it up pretty quickly?

    STONE: Yeah. Relatively quickly. I went to bass lessons everyday in Toronto but I learned all the songs for the movie and just practiced until I had it down.
    [ad#contestbox]
    QUESTION: Do you play another instrument?

    STONE: I dabble ““ not well no. I played a bit of guitar, a bit of piano.

    QUESTION: But you sing? You are musically inclined.

    STONE: Yeah. In a sense, but I’m by no means a musician by trade. I will not be making an album.

    QUESTION: How much free reign did you guys have with the script? Jason Sudeikis would come on screen and just fire off stuff ““ like there’s no way all that stuff was scripted.

    STONE: Yeah. The majority of Jason’s stuff was improved. There were hysterical things he said and did that were not scripted and he had us dying. I’ve been really lucky to have a bit more reign like in House Bunny and Superbad ““ this one was quick ““ we knocked it out pretty quick ““ two lines I wrote for this movie but that’s about it. That was my free reign.

    QUESTION: At least you had a little something.

    STONE: Yeah, it was great. Amelia is not too funny by any means. She’s not really coming up jokes all the time so what was scripted was good.

    QUESTION: Did you guys rehearse for this?

    STONE: Yes, we did. All the band. Absolutely. We needed to have the camaraderie of the band so about two weeks before we started shooting we rehearsed as a band in a big empty warehouse in Toronto. Pretty much every day.

    QUESTION: Were you a temporary little band?

    STONE: We were a temporary little band.

    QUESTION: Did Rainn have to learn to play drums too? He looked natural on screen but you could tell”¦.

    STONE: Yes. He had a drum coach named Stu and he was hysterical and picking up chicks all over the place.

    (Laughs)

    QUESTION: So the movie was about him?

    STONE: Yeah ““ the movie was about Stu. No, No, he was awesome. He taught Rainn how to do drum fills because you can’t really fake drum fills so Rainn practiced his ass off and Walter, his son who looks exactly like him ““ looks like Rainn in that poster, wants to be a drummer, so he passed it on to his child. He had to really learn and buckle down.

    QUESTION: Do you think he might do a show out here?

    STONE: Hopefully. Rainn and Walter together. Drumming it up.

    QUESTION: Coincidentally there is a metal punk band out here called ADD.

    STONE: Are you serious?

    QUESTION: Totally serious.

    [Ed. note – Just shoot me. Please]

    STONE: Who knew?

    QUESTION: I did.

    [Ed. note – Aaaand that makes this guy a douche bag for bringing it up.]

    QUESTION: What was it like making a movie like Superbad and Rocker without being 21? Everybody else party without you or how did that go?

    STONE: Um, well Superbad was ““ oh man, I was 17. Chris who played Fogell was 17, Michael was 18, Jonah was over 21 but they are not really partiers as they say so it wasn’t too bad. And the Rocker ““ Teddy was young and I was young and I’m not really big on the scene so it wasn’t too bad.

    QUESTION: Keep out of the tabloids that way.

    STONE: No complaints there.

    CHRISTOPHER STIPP: You started your career locally here in Arizona, you moved from Scottsdale to Los Angeles and obviously you got a big break with Superbad and House Bunny and now The Rocker. How is life been as a working actress now that you seem to be on an ascent of sorts?

    STONE: Different than it was the first 3 years I was in LA and not a working actress. There is a lot of rejection for many years. I convinced my parents to let me move out there when I as 15 and you can probably imagine what it was like. I was not really working and I should have been in high school and I was just auditioning and auditioning and nothing was happening so I’m incredibly grateful at this point that this much has happened and I don’t have a job lined up next.

    But as a working actor that is just what comes with the territory, so you never know after movie. Working actor. But, I’m not really working right now. It’s interesting.

    CS: How did you convince your parents to let you go?

    STONE: The power of my presentation. I made a PowerPoint presentation.

    QUESTION: Do you still have that?

    STONE: It was on a virus running computer. It’s been extracted by an IT guy at my dad’s company. So I have a loose outline ““ all the text is there.

    QUESTION: What was the most funny, memorable part of making the movie on or off screen?

    STONE: One night when we were shooting the arena scene at the end when we open for Vesuvius, we shot from 4:00 PM until Noon the next day so it went from light to dark to really bright and three of us hallucinated. We saw a little boy and we know we were going to talk about it later on. Maybe it was Walter running around drumming ““ yeah, who knows. It was really bizarre.

    QUESTION: Did you actually get to perform in front of 20,000 people?

    STONE: It was about 700 extras and then with cg they just multiplied, and multiplied, and multiplied. It wasn’t quite 20,000 but it was still pretty nerve wracking to be in front of 700 people playing base which I am sub par at.

    QUESTION: So would you rather be a movie star or a rock star?

    [Ed. note – Why didn’t this asshole just ask if she could be a tree what kind of tree she would be? Seriously, this is killing me.]

    STONE: Oh man”¦well I don’t really know too much about either quite yet but I don’t really know how much I’ll know about rock star but it was pretty awesome to be in rock stardom for a day.

    QUESTION: Have you seen the Vanity Fair shot yet?

    STONE: Yes.

    QUESTION: And you tell us you are not a movie star? That’s big, young Hollywood right there.

    STONE: Man, it was pouring rain and 30 degrees. What you don’t know is that Olivia’s dress is completely soaked in the back. Yeah, it was sweet. I can’t believe you can’t tell that it’s raining but if you look at the background ““ that was pretty cool.

    QUESTION: Who had the biggest fear of heights?

    STONE: We were all just freezing and it was raining ““ we were just ready to get out of the rain.

    QUESTION: You did a lot of touring in the movie, do you do much traveling as an actor?

    STONE: Well, I haven’t really traveled too much for acting. We shot Superbad in LA, Rocker in Toronto, House Bunny in LA and The Ghosts of Girlfriends Past, which I just finished, in Boston. I know a lot of actors that say, “I went to New Zealand”. My roommate, Martha, who is the other girl in Superbad just went to Cape Town, South Africa and now she’s in Vancouver so she’s getting to go all over the place so hopefully I’ll get to travel more.

    QUESTION: There are big name actors in the The Ghosts of Girlfriends Past movie. Were you excited about that?

    STONE: Yeah. It was pretty cool. The only person I really worked with because I play a ghost and the only person I was doing scenes with was Matthew McConaughey and he’s great. He’s funny.

    QUESTION: Did he keep his shirt on?

    [Ed. note – This was perhaps the best question of the bunch]

    STONE: Everybody always asks that! “Did he keep his shirt on” and,  “What’s he going to be like as a Dad?” Yes”¦and great.

    QUESTION: In the movie, Fish likes to rock out, anything you like to do to get pumped up before you go out to perform?

    STONE: Probably drink a Red Bull or some water. There’s some seriousness going down.

    QUESTION: As an out of work 15 year old actor what is the worst advice anyone gave you in LA?

    STONE: Not some bad advice but some pretty bad auditions definitely. I was pretty lucky.

    CS: Based on where you are now in your career, the kinds of scripts you are being offered now as opposed to 3 years ago, being a working actress, how picky are you regarding things you are looking for? Do you do things as a way to keep money coming in or can you afford to be choosy?

    STONE: I, thankfully, have never had the mentality that I have to do this because I need the money for this. I have to find aspects that I would love to be able to do it. However, the next script I do, I absolutely have to love it or I will go crazy. I’m going to hold out as long as I absolutely have to and it probably won’t be a studio comedy. I think I’m excited to get into the more human and relatable the better ““ like Harold and Maude ““ I love that stuff.

    It taught me so much in my life. I would like to be able to do that for other people. So the next thing that comes along that makes me feel the way those movies made me feel, that’s what I’d like to do.

    QUESTION: You have a lot of fans in the comic book industry”¦

    [Ed. note – Woah! Guess which guy asked that question?]

    STONE: Seriously? I didn’t know that.

    [Ed. note – She didn’t know that because we were all pretty sure it wasn’t true.]

    QUESTION: So I guess any kind of comic book related movie is not a part of what you are looking for in the future?

    [Ed. note – This was one of those awkward red carpet/Tiki Barber moments but it was in full living color.]

    STONE: No. Not necessarily. That would be awesome. I know there is some graphic novel that they are making soon that sounds pretty cool. There is some cool stuff coming up ““ The Jetsons. But that’s a cartoon. Why comic books?

    QUESTION: Because you are a hot chick.

    [Ed. note – Douche bag. Seriously, it’s this kind of shit that makes every Internet “journalist” suspect as skeevy wretches.]

    STONE: Man, that is so funny. I had no idea.

    QUESTION: Any character you can think of maybe?

    [Ed. note – Akward moment #2]

    STONE: I would have loved to have played Mary Jane. That would have been really cool.

    QUESTION: What makes you an Arizona girl? What have you brought from Arizona to LA?

    STONE: It’s hard because I’m really bad with the heat. Growing up in Arizona I really struggled with the heat. So I guess I just stayed inside and watched movies. So all those movies just came with me and continued on. Who knows, if it wasn’t so hot out I wouldn’t have stayed in and watched movies so”¦.

    QUESTION: There are some really interesting one line pick up lines in the movie. Can you remember any that you received?

    STONE: I don’t really get pick up lines.

    QUESTION: Are you a fan of The Office?

    STONE: Yes. That was one of the main reasons I wanted to be involved in The Rocker for sure. He’s just hysterical and Fish is so different than Dwight so it was fun to see him branch out into that territory. Because Dwight is not crazy at all.

    QUESTION: When he was the naked drummer did you get to see more of him than the audience got to see?

    STONE: No, that was a closed set and I was reacting to nothing. I was reacting to the idea of him being naked on screen. But it worked out.

  • Trailer Park: Darren Aronofsky Part 2

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    I’m awesome. I wrote a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

    You’ve just to meet the twins.

    The Massie Twins are perhaps the best thing in the world to happen at interview sessions when you find yourself cursing your lot at not having access to a 1:1 with a true visionary. These guys, genuine twins, are perhaps the nicest, kindest, honest to a fault interviewers that I wish were at every interview situation. The talent that sees them just fall over themselves as they look at these grown men who dress and look alike. Myself, I do want to throw the yellow foul flag in that these guys like to think that since there’s two of them that in a roundtable situation they get 2 questions when everyone else their 1 but I’m quibbling and this was a chance to talk to Darren Aronofsky after all.

    When I had the chance to say hey once more to the guy who genuinely mixes enthusiasm for his job and a jaunty introspection in the way he speaks I could not pass it up. Darren is kind of person who is more interested in knowing what you thought about what he made than he is to tell you about it. When he rolled in with his tall tea, working a small packet of honey into his drink and then working his way though an orange, there is just no way you would guess by his humble persona that here is a man who has brought the world a film that is being mentioned in the same breath as other Oscar worthy productions; he defies the stereotype that you have to be a thick willed fist thumper to be great.

    Darren is great simply for spending time with some schlubs to chitter chatter about THE WRESTLER. I know a lot could be made of all the different people I am able to talk to but getting time with this guy simply trumps 99% of everything else I am able to do throughout the year. My inner nerd was satiated thoroughly for weeks after.

    CHRISTOPHER STIPP: I have been reading the interviews that after The Fountain you wanted to get back to basics. You just wanted to work with actors again. How does this experience, obviously they are two different movies, compare to The Fountain?

    ARONOFSKY: Well, ultimately it’s all very similar, the work. You have a very limited amount of time, amount of money. It doesn’t matter the scale of the film. You end up doing very similar stuff. There is just different challenges specific to the projects. This was the Mickey Rourke challenge for this film. Otherwise it was very similar but it’s amazing how quick it goes when you don’t have to do special effects. We finished shooting in March, so it’s been 6 months from the time we finished shooting that we were at the Venice Film Festival. So, that’s great. It was a lot of fun. I kind of admire Woody Allen for just being able to clock them out one a year.

    QUESTION: How do you go about choosing your next project? How did you go from The Fountain to this?

    ARONOFSKY: Well I was just looking for an actor’s piece. I looked at everything we had in development and this seemed like one of the strongest contenders as far as that. You never really know. When people ask me what’s next, I never really know. Until I have a script that’s like, “OK, I’m confident enough to jump in.”

    But I was looking for something that was an actor’s piece and I was kind of nervous about the wrestling elements because they were action and they would take their time because all I really wanted to do was like two actors in a room talking and see what I could do with that. But it seemed like the best thing I had ahead of me. Everyone else thought I was out of my mind. “What are you doing? A wresting picture with Mickey Rourke? Are you out of your mind? ”

    Now, in retrospect, the Mickey Rourke in the part makes sense but back then, no one wanted to support it.

    QUESTION: When you first got into it, Mickey Rourke was already attached to it?

    ARONOFSKY: I brought Mickey Rourke into it. I had an idea that when I graduated from film school in ’94 or ’95, I sat down and made a list of possible ideas for films. And the Wrestler was on that list. I can’t imagine the exact thought process but I think it came out of the idea that no one had done that world in a serious way. But then in about ’02, when The Fountain fell apart the first time, before I put it back together, I got together with this producer Scott Franklin who had been a producer on my first two films, together we started to work out story ideas and do some research and I chose him to produce it because he was a wrestling fan, more than me. So together we started to develop some stories and then about ’04 or ’05, we found Rob Siegel who was the editor of The Onion for 7 years and then he just seemed right for the material and that was about the same time the light bulb for Mickey Rourke went off.

    CS: Building on that, the light bulb for Mickey Rourke, and now it looks like a master stroke, one thing I noticed watching the movie is that I didn’t know where The Ram stopped and Mickey Rourke started.

    ARONOFSKY: Sure.

    CS: And everyone is talking about that part at the end when he talks about redemption.

    ARONOFSKY: You thought that moment worked?

    CS: I choked up myself.

    ARONOFSKY: Did you? During his speech?

    CS: During his speech. Like writers say, you have to earn it, you have to earn that moment. And not only did you earn it but I think Mickey earned it.

    ARONOFSKY: Well, Mickey ended up rewriting that to make it more personal. What happened, was me and Rob, the writer, went to this one match out in Long Island and this young wrester who was part of the Hart family which is a kind of a big famous wrestling dynasty, got up there and made this speech about very personal, a little too personal and I looked at Rob and we said, “Yeah, The Ram has got to make a speech at the end.”

    Rob wrote a speech at the end that was great but about 2 days before Mickey said, “I think I have some ideas for that, mind if I work on that?” We said “No, go ahead” and came in the day of and showed it to me and I said, “Do you really want to say this?” Because I knew what he was doing but we never talked about it. Never talked about the connection between the character and Mickey. It’s not really my business. Now we are very good friends and I talk to him about everything. But back then, our relationship was young. So he said “Yeah, I want to give it a shot” and basically we had 2 takes on it because there was a crowd of 2500 ““ 3000 people and the first take didn’t go too well.

    Then I talked to the crowd what the moment meant and the second take was that take.

    That take is all the way from him walking out of the curtain, going around the ring, and then he enters the ring, there was a second camera in the ring, and then that first camera ran around and up a ladder to shoot Marisa for that closeup while that second camera continued as he went and did the whole speech. So all of Marisa’s close-ups and Mickey’s speech happened at the same time. So, it was pretty cool and a lot of fun.

    QUESTION: How about Marisa and the rest of the cast? What was the casting process like?

    ARONOFSKY: Mickey was the first step. I didn’t really want to cast the daughter until we knew it was Mickey for sure, so once we figured out how to make the film with Mickey, Evan Rachel Wood seemed like a good option because I thought they had a similar round face and the lips were similar and I thought it was passable. It’s always hard when you cast two famous people as say, father/daughter or siblings, always a tricky thing. That worked out and then it was a very hard role to cast the stripper because every actor knows that within a few months of the release of the film those images are going to be on the internet forever and that’s part of the deal.

    But, I was just very clear that we are doing a very realistic film so the nudity had to be real. I about peeve when you see a couple waking up after having sex in a movie and they are trying to hold on to sheets so their privates don’t show. It’s just so unreal and pulls you out but this film was just so important that they are artist with their bodies and have to show their bodies. It’s all about that. So I put that out there and Marisa was a very early choice because I think her complexity is rarely tapped. She’s often playing very cutesy but I could tell she had a lot of depth. She brought a lot of life to a role that could have very easily been a cliché.

    QUESTION: So were you a fan of the whole independent wrestling circuit before this?

    ARONOFSKY: No. Not a fan now. I wouldn’t go back to a match ever.

    QUESTION: Before this did you go to a bunch of different matches?

    ARONOFSKY: We did a ton of research and went all over the place. Long two/three hour drives to go to places where sometimes there would be more wrestlers than there would be fans. We went to one autograph signing that totally inspired the autograph signing in our film where there were all these legends from Jimmy Snuka to Ricky Johnson, the Rock’s uncle, Captain Lou Albano was there, Iron Sheik was there, Nikoli Volkoff was there, it was a huge, great legends there. It was so sad for these legends. So sad.

    QUESTION: Where did the staple gun come from? Did you see that?

    ARONOFSKY: Oh yeah. Much worse. Necro Butcher is this kind of underground cult American hero. He is the marquee, top billing draw to a lot of these events. When he comes out the crowd goes crazy because they know they are going to get their blood. It’s a funny story actually. We were casting all day and it was tough. We cast in my office. My office ended up smelling like Ben Gay for weeks afterwards. And these guys would come in and I wanted to see their gimmicks. That’s what they called their costumes. Their costumes are their gimmicks. So they would slather themselves with Ben Gay. It was a long day and a lot of them were terrible actors, some were OK.

    Necro Butcher lives out in Pittsburgh, doesn’t have a cell phone and just drives everywhere. Pittsburgh to Manhattan is probably about 12 hours so no one had heard from him, called his girlfriend, she was nervous because he hadn’t checked in. I was leaving and I got on the train and my phone doesn’t usually work on there but the phone rings and they said Necro Butcher just showed up. And he’s like the only guy on the planet, except for maybe George Clooney, who could have shown up in my office that I would have gone back because I was so exhausted I just wanted to go home. So I got out, went back and he was the sweetest guy in the world. He’s a military guy so everything is yes sir, no sir, thank you sir. When he read the script he said thank you for making a movie about my life sir, it means so much to me sir and then”¦ he’s this sick mother fucker. The guy in the hardcore match. He’s a great guy. That scene when they talk about the staple gun, that was just improvised. I said “Have a conversation, tell him where you’re from, tell him about the match” and they just came up with the lines themselves and that’s what happened.

    CS: The music. Two things about the shift from your previous films ““ you went through a very long, long stretch in the beginning of that film and you just don’t hear anything. What was Clint’s job when he said, “What do I have to do with this?”

    ARONOFSKY: We almost went without a score with this one. The film ultimately didn’t need one but because whenever we stuck score music in it kind of made the emotion of the scene collapse. I think just because there was such a tender line and so naturalistic that if you stuck something unnatural like a score, it really hurt.

    So it was a very slim score but probably the hardest score he’s ever done according to himself. And I think the reason for that is because it just had to be atmospheric. It had to just kind of create the mood but not add to the emotional content of the actors. So, that’s what the score is doing. When we started to hear guitars that’s when we came up with the idea for Slash so he came in the recording. He’s a great guy. Really sweet guy. Not your typical rock star.

    And then the Bruce song was all because of Mickey. Mickey wrote him a letter and they are old friends and ended up doing it for free just to support the film. And to support Mickey really.

    THE MASSIE TWINS: You refer to your films”¦

    ARONOFSKY: Do you guys really wear the same shirts?

    (Laughs)

    THE MASSIE TWINS: It’s for a picture with you afterwards.

    ARONOFSKY: Oh, OK. You don’t do that everyday? That would be really upsetting.

    (Laughs)

    ARONOFSKY: One of you has got to get Lasik and screw with the other one.

    QUESTION: You refer to your films as wild style. How would you refer the Wrestler?

    ARONOFSKY: Wild style has definitely taken a trip away so I don’t know. I think, if I was going to use a hip-hop term because I used a hip-hop term back then, it would be something like, it’s more of a tag. Do you know what that is? It’s just very street style. I call it pro-active documentary style because I wanted to do a documentary style because I’m a verite but because I knew somewhat what the actors were going to do and what the plot was you can lead them a bit or be ahead of them a tiny bit or really work with them almost like dancing with them. We knew what they were going to do so we were with them. If something different happened, we were able to adjust as well because there was a human operator holding the camera. That’s why it’s a proactive documentary style.

    QUESTION: Online it shows that you are going to be associated with the Robocop remake. Any truth to that at all?

    ARONOFSKY: Well, we’re working on a script. It’s just a development deal but we have a long way to go. We have a great writer and we’ll see what happens.

    QUESTION: Do you use the internet for feedback? Do you Google yourself and see what people are saying?

    ARONOFSKY: Not too much. I look at some of the film blogs just so I know what’s happening in the film business. Like Slash Film, Hollywood Elsewhere. There are a few sites I’ll check once a day just to see what’s the latest news is. But I think it’s bad to read your reviews because that’s not what it’s about. It’s about making stuff and then moving on and keep making stuff and you’ve wasted time looking at stuff.

    CS: I read an interview with Mickey Rourke when you approached him to do it. It was basically a Come to Jesus meeting of you telling him what you expected out of him. Can you explain the process of convincing the people who had the purse strings that he was the person you wanted and then to Mickey telling him, “There’s a lot on the line right now…”

    ARONOFSKY: First I went to Mickey because I knew it would be difficult to raise the money for Mickey but I first wanted to be sure that if I wanted to do the hard work of trying to find money to finance a film that he would show up and want to do it and wanted to get back to work. And once I got that kind of understanding with him, it was really hard to find the money. It took us about two years to finance the film and every single financier in the business said no.

    Every single financier in the business said no. Everyone.

    We went to all kinds of different types of financing ““ studios passed. Everyone passed. Independent. International. Except for one French company that was offering way too little money to make it but they at least were supporting us with full creative freedom. So we figured out how to make it for 6 million dollars and we did it.

    QUESTION: You have incredible detail for the visual elements, how was your dynamic with your cinematographer?

    ARONOFSKY: She was great. It was the first time I worked with Maryse Alberti. The whole crew was an improvement. I wanted to do something very different and reinvent myself. I’ve joked that if Madonna taught us anything, it’s that you need to reinvent yourself and I think that’s true as a creative person, you have to just keep mixing it up and changing and moving forward. So, Maryse was an interesting candidate because, not only has she done some great features like Happiness and Velvet Goldmine back in the day but then she ended up doing a lot of documentaries like Crumb and Enron and Taxi to the Dark Side. She had exactly what I needed, had a film background plus documentary. Once I heard about her I was very intrigued. We talked on the phone and got along pretty well. She’s a spunky French girl and she was just great. Basically I only had to wait 5 minutes, the longest time I had to wait. She would just go in, light it, no baloney and we would shoot.

    QUESTION: Do you have any plans on doing cameos in your films?

    ARONOFSKY: I used to back in the day but it’s too stressful and there’s enough people who do it. I’ll just stay behind the camera. I’m not really actor.

    CS: When you were writing this script and coming off The Fountain where your head was at after it got the reception that it did, how did you know that The Wrestler was going to be the one? The only reason I’m asking this question is that I’ve read about you wanting to make a tent pole, that you have the ambition that you could. It’s not that you want to be an independent guy for the rest of your life. This is a $6 million dollar picture and not a tent pole, was there any impetus for wanting to go the tent pole route or get back to basics with this?

    ARONOFSKY: It wasn’t about that. There was no tent pole that was that interesting which is probably going to be the case for a long time. This was the most interesting project in front of me. For me, The Fountain was the exact film I wanted to make and it’s got a great split of people who hate it and people who love it and I think the people who love it are starting to win as time goes by and I think choosing The Wrestler really was not a reaction to anything about The Fountain except that the first three films was the same filmmaking team, the same producer, the same dp, the same production designer, the same editor and it kind of just was the end of an era and I was a dad and just wanted to do something different. I looked for the most radically different thing I could do and it just seemed like it, and it was. It didn’t fit into anything I had done and I liked that idea of breaking out of molds.

    QUESTION: Did you see the film with an audience?

    ARONOFSKY: Yes, at festivals.

    QUESTION: What did you think about the reactions? There are some parts where people were laughing and they were comedic at a superficial level but if you really thought about it they were really tragic. Did you notice that?

    ARONOFSKY: Yes. I love that there’s humor. And yes, they are laughing at things that are really kind of tragic but it’s meant to be funny. That’s part of what Mickey brought to the table. It’s OK to laugh at him sometimes and it’s OK to laugh with him and he’s laughing a lot and even in sadness there’s a lot of humor. But even that deli scene, it’s a really sad scene that this guy’s been reduced to this level but you just kind of root for him deep down. I think it means they are connected with him. You are never really laughing at The Ram in a way that he wouldn’t be OK with.

    QUESTION: Building on that, how was it at Venice and getting the Golden Lion?

    ARONOFSKY: To be honest we finished the film two days before. And about two weeks before we were thinking about pulling out. Not because we weren’t going to finish but because I wasn’t sure the Venice crowd would go for it. It’s a small film and they like literary efforts it seems like. Everyone dreams about winning a gold medal but to be honest, I never, ever dreamt that the Golden Lion would be possible. I didn’t even fantasize about it. I just thought “OK, we’ll go, and hopefully survive and get some good notices internationally and maybe might get recognized” because I knew that Mickey was doing some good work but it was a complete surprise.

    I remember the first thing that happened was that we went out to lunch after the judges had seen the film and we were at lunch with one of the distributors and she got a phone call and she said the jury really liked it. So I thought, that’s cool. I still never put it together of what that meant because she kind of slipped it. But then we had a press conference and the press gave us a standing ovation which is something I’ve never seen. The press is usually jaded.

    (Laughs)

    At the film festival we were the last movie, the last film of the festival and usually the last film of the festival is the crappiest film because it’s the worst lot because everyone has left by that point. The sexy part is the first weekend and we were the final, 10th day or 12th day, the last film. So half the audience stood up and I’m like “OK, that’s weird” because the press was very friendly which in Venice they can be really tough and after our public screening, which was great, the audience really liked it. They didn’t really laugh at the humor which concerned me but I think the humor was very American and subtle in a lot of ways.

    The head of the jury pulled us into his office and popped some champagne and said you guys are going to have to stay. I said, what do you mean I’m going to have to stay? We have to go to Toronto to sell the movie. And he said, no you have to stay. So I said, do I have to stay or does Mickey have to stay? He said, no you both have to stay. So I said, do we sorta have to stay or do we really have to stay? I mean, how much? And so it was just wild. Way beyond our expectations.

    Wednesday we finished the film, Thursday we got to Venice, Friday we screened, Saturday we won The Golden Lion and Sunday we woke up at 5:00 AM, flew to Toronto, got there at 3:00 PM, screened it at 6:00 PM and sold it at 5:00 AM in the morning to Fox Searchlight. So it was really like in 6 days it was one of those things. It all seems surreal but it was a good time.

  • Trailer Park: Attack of the Article

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    I’m awesome. I wrote a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

    And now, you can follow me on Twitter. Find me here, my oh so original name on the thing is Stipp so come on and follow my stray ramblings. The nice thing you should know is that I don’t machine gun blast with the number of tweets I put out there, I’m fairly mellow….

    Now, as for this special edition of Trailer Park I have to start with a question: How many times do I come out and shill for something?

    Exactly, none times. Anyone pointing to my free book up there doesn’t count as I’m truly giving that away.

    I want you to spend $5.99 on a copy of the January issue of GEEK MONTHLY. Or, at the very least, read the teaser page right here and see whether you want to read the rest. That’s fair, isn’t it?

    I’m proud of the little article that could and I am indebted to the fine folks at Geek for thinking that Kevin and Olivia of Attack of the Show would make for a good story. And they did. Olivia even gives an excellent conclusion to the time I spent with her on the phone.

    The thing about the article was that the time I spent talking to Kevin and Olivia was interesting insofar that these hosts defy the usual definition of what it means to be a television host. You never know what you’re going to get on the phone or what will be sitting across from you when you get set up for one of these interviews but both of them proved not only to be just as razor sharp about technology and what is on the horizon with technology but they were flat out fun to talk to.

    The chemistry the two of them share transcends the page when you hear the inflections and manner in which they talk about one another but thankfully it also came across in their seriousness about what they value more than anything when it comes to the program: honesty.

    Frankly, it’s their honesty to call out anything and everything that earns my respect as a viewer. I hate being smiled at by a vapid talking head but Kevin and Olivia just like to say it like it is. For those who wonder whether it’s really their opinion at times just watch a gadget review if Kevin happens not to like a product; it would be enough to make an entire PR department run screaming from their lily white office spaces.

    Hopefully that comes across in the article I wrote and I can’t tell you how appreciative I would be, if you are not related to me by blood, semen or any other fluids, if you bought a copy, and if you dig it, to write in and let them know about it.

    Regardless of what happens with this, I am thankful just for the opportunity to write for a magazine that I, myself, buy on a monthly basis and it really is a thrill to think that I have my name in something that can be bought anywhere from Seattle, Washington to Chicago, Illinois to New York, New York. You’ve just got to geek out about that and I know how lucky I am that I can cross this accomplishment off my life list.

    Special thanks to Comic101’s and raconteur extraordinaire, Josh Jabcuga for the heads-up that it came out.
    And now, a little sumthin’ sumthin’ from Ray “Don’t Hurt ’em Hammer” Schillaci…
    [ad#contestbox]

    Worth Reviving: Animal Instincts Prevail

    When people mention classic monster/horror movies, usually Frankenstein, Dracula, The Mummy and The Wolf Man come to mind. On a rare occasion you may get somebody bringing up the disturbing Todd Browning’s “Freaks” which is like the Ark of the Covenant of horror with it’s combination of dark brooding direction and story. But the one that rarely gets mentioned and is a tent pole of freakish horror is the 1932 version of H.G. Wells’ “Island of Lost Souls”. Upon it’s release the film was banned in the UK till 1958 with Britain labeling it “a crime against nature”. Some scenes actually caused some to vomit in the theater in the U.S.

    Now with all this hype one may go into this film with extremely high expectations ““ don’t! Remember, this was the 1930’s. But the film is a great piece of cinematic history that has somehow missed the video revolution. Other than a few terrible pirated versions, “Island of Lost Souls” still remains unavailable to this day. This is a shame since the story itself has inspired countless sub-par rip offs and a horrible bastardization starring an over indulgent performance by Marlon Brando with make-up effects that were laughable at best. There is no comparison to the original with the eerie performances by Charles Laughton and Bela Lugosi. The make-up creations (for back then) for Pig Man, Manimal and several other man-beasts is the stuff of childhood nightmares with sound effects that linger in one’s memory long after.

    The story, if you are not familiar with it, involves Edward Parker who is thrown overboard while getting into a fight with the captain of a ship that makes deliveries for a nefarious doctor on an uncharted island. The obsessed, sociopath, whip-cracking Dr. Moreau is conducting human experiments involving evolution. He has established himself as some God-like deity to the misfortunate ones who have survived as mutated half human/animal abominations. Moreau prefers to be secretive about his work and becomes incensed when he is visited upon by Parker, who happens to take an interest in one of the doctor’s more successful experiments, Lota, the beautiful panther woman. Parker eventually disrupts his plans, causing all hell to break loose amongst the mutated half-human/animal kingdom.

    Bela Lugosi gives his best performance since Dracula as the Sayer of the Law. The raw power that emanates from the last fifteen minutes of this landmark film rivals that creepy last scene in Todd Browning’s “Freaks” where the sideshow performers hunt down Cleopatra during a storm-filled night to show her what it really is like being a freak. This film is a flat-out classic that deserves a Criterion release. There are so many interesting background stories that surround the film; it would be a shame to put out a bare bones edition. Of course, at this point many of us fans would be happy with any kind of decent release and one cannot help wonder what has held this great film back from the public. For now, there is only a VHS version of the film from Universal. Perhaps a letter (or email) campaign can spur the studio that prides itself as the home of monster classics to release one of the very best.

  • Trailer Park: Darren Aronofsky Interview – Part 1

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    I’m awesome. I wrote a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

    While you’re at it, follow me over at Twitter! You can find me here at: Twitter.com/Stipp I’m not sure what I’m doing, I’m not positive I’ve gotten down what a “hash tag” is but I do know I haven’t asked anyone to get off my virtual lawn.

    Darren Aronofsky got jailed in East Germany. I had no clue. The arrest and the subsequent punishment made the press day all that more hilarious…From hiking mountains, his honest view of The Matrix and the latest Star Wars entries, what got Marisa Tomei in tip top shape to play a stripper, why we re-named a mountain because of its derogatory implications, why he’s angry about the digital releases of his films and oodles of completely useless but fascinating information.

    This is going to be a funky 2 part interview. I’m actually reversing things. Usually you would get the proper interview and the outtakes but I’m flipping it here because I feel like it. What’s contained in this thing was just too good not to run first. You’ll get the straight laced interview next week so I hope you dig this.

    What follows is, genuinely, a lunch with Darren Aronofsky. I talked to the guy, along with some other journos, during the Phoenix press day for THE WRESTLER. The interview was odd, and I’ll get into this later, in that it was just me and one more film site and then another guy who accidentally showed up late with about 5 minutes left in the interview. The situation was absolutely bizarre in that to further increase the oddity factor this interview was not held in some hotel room, it was in a vacated condominium. After I was about to leave the hotel where the interview took place, and I could have had the opportunity to talk to Marisa Tomei with the other guys, but I didn’t and don’t belong to the Phoenix Film Critics Society and was, therefore, denied entry into the interview room.

    Lord knows I would never be part of club that would have me as a member but considering that of the whole city of Phoenix you had 2 outlets representing the entire metropolitan area it didn’t make sense that my conditional membership would have prevented me from asking a few questions. Believe me, there were no sour grapes at all as I am comfortably numb to just go with the flow. One of the solid PR reps who has been an absolute godsend in my tenure here in the Phoenix area – he was the very first guy who helped me get Darren the last time he came through town for THE FOUNTAIN – suggested I walk across the hall to another abandoned condo that was being set up for what was a Meet and Greet luncheon with both Darren and Marisa. The spread was phenomenal. Meats and cheeses of all different varieties. Fruit and veggies and breads of various kinds. Now, while Darren eventually saddled up close to me at the one of two tables for the event (I believe there was only about a dozen or so people who were invited to this mid-day hootenanny) I decided to click on my recorder and capture some real interesting tidbits about THE WRESTLER and when we can expect a better version of PI on DVD.

    CHRISTOPHER STIPP: Was the deli scene improvised or was it all scripted?

    DARREN ARONOFSKY: It was 50/50. A lot of it was improvised. We couldn’t close the deli in the supermarket, people were coming by and ordering stuff, and I said, “Mickey, go serve them,” and he just said, “Do you mind if we shoot you?” People couldn’t really recognize him, he couldn’t really be famous, his hair was up. It was hard to recognize him.

    CS: Was the potato salad lady real?

    ARONOFSKY: A little more, a little less? She was a real actress. The woman who ordered the fried chicken was fake, half of them were fake. And at one point the manager of the deli came over to me and said, “Can you ask Mickey to improve his handwriting? ” And I said, “What are you talking about?” I guess people were really buying the meat!

    He was scribbling nonsense. Between takes he’s not sterile…he’s wiping his nose….

    (Laughs)

    QUESTION: The character reminds me in some odd way of Charlize Theron’s MONSTER. He’s not the kind of person that you would associate with, and you would almost avoid him, but he has so much heart, so much humanity that you are just pulling for him all the way. And I felt like, Marisa’s character, I didn’t want him to go in that ring, I wanted him to go with her. And of course I loved that you just leave it up to our imagination what happened there. You just root for him all the way.

    ARONOFSKY: Thank you so much. I’m glad. It’s kind of the magic of cinema. I’ve been watching My Neighbor Totoro, the Miyazaki film, with my 2 ½ year old and we watch it over and over again and that’s about a 7 year old Japanese animated film and that’s the beauty of film is that you can connect with Randy the Ram or a 7 year old animated Japanese girl and it’s just humanness.

    QUESTION: I was talking to Marisa, she mentioned that one of her favorite scenes was shopping for the clothes, and I said it was nerve wracking when he pulls out that sweater and I’m thinking, “You made the wrong decision.” And then here’s the second package and she said originally that there may have only been the one gift.

    ARONOFSKY: Yeah, the pea coat evolved because we realized that it was just too ridiculous just like that. It made sense because it made him more thankful to Marisa’s character and she kind of saved him as well. The script evolved a lot. There must have been 25-30 drafts. I tortured the writer. Normally I torture myself so it was really nice to have someone else do the heavy lifting.

    (Marisa Tomei enters the luncheon)

    Hello Marisa. Everybody this is Marisa.

    MARISA TOMEI: Hello everybody.

    (Applause)

    [Ed. note – I have no idea why people felt compelled to clap. I kept eating my hummus and pita.]

    SOME RANDOM A-HOLE: You look beautiful.

    [Ed. note – I have no idea what sycophant tossed this out there but they obviously had grand illusions of possibly scoring with her at the hot artichoke dip table]

    ARONOFSKY: Tell them your secret.

    TOMEI: Hula hoops.

    (Laughs)

    ARONOFSKY: Yeah, she had the hula hoop everywhere.

    QUESTION: How often do you hula hoop?

    TOMEI: I do do it everyday.

    QUESTION: How long to you do it?

    TOMEI: The longer you do it, the better. Less than an hour.

    ARONOFSKY: Would you drop it after an hour?

    TOMEI: I won’t do it longer than an hour anyway.

    QUESTION: You are a tough interviewer.

    [Ed. note – No, this person was not being ironic.]

    ARONOFSKY: She talks about it all the time and I never really asked.

    TOMEI: I try to get people into it. I gave a lot of people hoops for Christmas last year.

    QUESTION: Did you take a lot of dancing classes, especially with the pole work?

    TOMEI: I took pole classes. The pole is different than stripping. It’s more athletic, more like gymnastics. Like doing the uneven bars. I was always a balancing, floor work kind of girl. When I was young I went to tap school and jazz school and I do have a natural flexibility. I tried to use the assets that I had and then learned more skills. It’s very hard.

    He has a new found respect for wrestlers and I have a new found respect for strippers. It really is not easy.

    QUESTION: What attracted you to the role?

    TOMEI: Part of it was that. I wanted to do that. I wanted to work on this film.

    QUESTION: It was moving and I was really touched.

    [Ed. note – Can you see what I am up against here?]

    TOMEI: Women like it better than the men ““ at least my character. They really have a reaction.

    QUESTION TO ARONOFSKY: When did you finish the movie?

    ARONOFSKY: We finished filming in March. It was really quick work. We started filming in late January or early February. It took a long time to get the money ““ about two years. And during that time we kept working on the script.

    QUESTION: How’s Noah’s Ark?

    ARONOFSKY: Working on it. We’re doing a graphic novel of it. That will probably come out first probably. We’ve been interviewing a bunch of people and negotiating because we don’t know where we’re going to get the money for it.

    QUESTION: The guy who did The Fountain graphic novel is doing the story board for the Jodorowsky film, King Shot I believe it is?

    ARONOFSKY: Kent Williams? Really? So Jodorowsky is working now?

    QUESTION: Yeah, he’s working with Marilyn Manson and Nick Nolte in King Shot.

    ARONOFSKY: Have they started shooting?

    QUESTION: I think they were scheduled to start.

    ARONOFSKY: That’s wild. What’s the premise?

    QUESTION: It’s set in the desert and there is a casino which is the head of Christ, beard, everything. Marilyn Manson is going to be the pope.

    ARONOFSKY: Geez. So it’s buried up to here? Up to here? And the top is Christ’s head.

    QUESTION: Yeah, casino slash bar or whatever.

    ARONOFSKY: And some drama unfolds inside.

    Good for him. I met him at a film festival in Spain at a sci-fi fantasy film fest and he came to a screening of The Fountain and he was great.

    QUESTION: Have you read his comics?

    ARONOFSKY: A bit. But don’t really care for them too much. I like his films but his comics go too far I think. I think it’s good that he has limitations. But, he’s getting rediscovered now. His DVD boxed set. So, it’s pretty cool.

    QUESTION: Where’s the Aronofsky boxed set?

    ARONOFSKY: We’ll see.

    CS: Do you have any involvement in that at all?

    ARONOFSKY: A little bit. They did do a Pi / Requiem boxed set but I was pissed off.

    CS: You didn’t like that one?

    ARONOFSKY: No, because what happened is that I called them up and said it was the 10th anniversary of Pi. “We should do a 5.1 mix for it,” I said. We did it old school with a stereo mix. I think it might have surrounds but it’s not 5.1. My crew wanted to go in for free and just wanted to update it and they said, “Why don’t we just put out a box set?” I said, “No, I don’t want to put out a box set. I want to do a re-mix of Pi.” But they wouldn’t do it.

    The film comes back to me in 10 years. I sold it for 20 years. And at the time I remember they almost broke the deal. They said, “We’re not giving it back to you.” And I said, “Then I’m breaking the deal. I want it back.” And now it’s been 10 years. Amazing how time goes by. Maybe then I’ll do a 5.1 update.

    QUESTION: Any special edition for Requiem?

    ARONOFSKY: We got everything out on that DVD. It was a good DVD. There was so much on there ““ Easter Egg ““ we worked hard on that.

    CS: Not so much on The Fountain?

    ARONOFSKY: The Fountain? I was pissed off as shit, man. Whatever. It made less money internationally than Requiem did. Made less than Pi did. They just completely dumped it. If it doesn’t go for blockbuster they just”¦. I said, “Just do an art house release, you’ll get your money back. There’s enough people out there…” But they didn’t. When it went to DVD they just kind of dumped it and I didn’t give them any support.

    CS: The commentary track you did was a rare freebie.

    ARONOFSKY: That’s cool. It was one way of doing it. But at some point I’ll get enough power to put that out in the right way.

    (Laughs)

    It’s all about power.

    QUESTION: Is it out on Blue Ray yet?

    ARONOFSKY: It is out on Blu Ray. It looks OK and sounds OK. My sound guys still think it’s the best mix we ever did. So I think the sound mix is good.

    CS: Some filmmakers make their films, shooting material specifically for the DVD ““ this obviously was a low budget film. Did you do anything special?

    ARONOFSKY: For the Wrestler? Not really. There is going to be an hour long documentary which is going to be really great. I’ve already seen a trailer for it and it’s really cool. Same guy who did the documentary for The Fountain

    It’ll be a good one.

    CS: Commentary?

    ARONOFSKY: I don’t think so. I don’t think I have the energy to do it. Maybe if I can get Mickey to do it with me. We could just sit there and joke and smoke a couple cigars to get through it.

    CS: Do you have an aversion of seeing your films or are you just done with it?

    ARONOFSKY: I just think you shouldn’t go back there. You watch it so many times when you are finishing it because you have to go over it inch by inch and then when all the technical stuff you have to go over it and by the time you’re done you are so exhausted from it.

    CS: Why does Lucas keep going back to the well?

    ARONOFSKY: Howard the Duck.

    QUESTION: That was supposed to come out on DVD.

    ARONOFSKY: It’s not out on DVD?

    QUESTION: Not officially. But you can get it.

    ARONOFSKY: Those second pre-Star Wars sucked, didn’t they?

    CS: Yes.

    ARONOFSKY: Indiana Jones sucked.

    Question: But a lot of critics liked that one. They said it was right in the same vein as the other ones ““ and it was like, “No, it’s not. It’s terrible.”

    ARONOFSKY: I actually liked the aliens part of it ““ when the thing took off – I liked the ending but the action scene through the jungle and stretching of the jeeps and stuff…it was just terrible action.

    QUESTION: Cate Blanchett. She looked cool in the trailers.

    ARONOFSKY: She did look cool in the trailers.

    Question: I was waiting for the face melting off scene but then it was so stupid ““ just this blur of special effects ““ couldn’t even tell what was going on. What was funny that a lot of people don’t realize that early on she was supposed to have psychic powers and she goes to Harrison Ford “You’re a hard man to read” and then the rest of it was supposed to be about her powers.

    ARONOFSKY: She was supposed to have powers?

    QUESTION: Yeah, she was supposed to have psychic powers but couldn’t read Indiana Jones.

    ARONOFSKY: She quit. The other night I saw the 2nd or 3rd Matrix while I was surfing through the channels on TV. Oh man, that’s bad. I really kind of like them too but it doesn’t really hold up. There’s a scene in Zion…the costumes are terrible.

    The Massie Twins: The whole story falls apart because they tried to split it between two movies so then number 2 doesn’t make sense and number 3 doesn’t do a good job of resolving anything. It’s too abstract. Although I like the action in number 2. I liked the drunk.

    ARONOFSKY: I don’t remember the drunk. Oh yeah, the albino.

    The Massie Twins: Yeah, he dresses up for Halloween ““ we bought the official costumes from Matrix.com and had all the makeup.

    ARONOFSKY: Did you look good?

    The Massie Twins: Yeah, I thought we did.

    (Laughs)

    The Massie Twins: We were over on Mill Avenue and thousands and thousands of people gather there people were taking pictures. We took like 3rd place for the costumes. That was the best part about Matrix is the fact that they created those characters.

    ARONOFSKY: So, there you have it.

    (Laughs)

    CS: You mentioned you started out not knowing a whole lot about wrestlers.

    ARONOFSKY: Yeah.

    CS: On the other side when you saw that moment when The Ram was sitting at the table for a signing and you see a guy with a catheter and a lot of other broken men. Did you see a lot of that, guys all busted up?

    ARONOFSKY: We went to an autograph show that was just desperate. All these legends and nobody there. It was just desperate. The catheter and the urine bag was fictional but there was a guy in a wheelchair that we saw. Actually Lou Albano was there. I think I talked about that, but he looked terrible. I didn’t even recognize him, that’s how bad he looked. He had a lot of strokes and it was just sad, holding on to that glory.

    Can’t you wait to see what Paris Hilton will turn into?

    (Laughs)

    ARONOFSKY: It’s the reason I stay alive, just to watch her decay.

    (Laughs)

    CS: So how much longer are you on this tour?

    ARONOFSKY: I’m almost done. I’ve got two more cities. We’re going to go to San Francisco and Seattle. I’ve never done Russia so I want to go. My grandparents came from Russia and I’m very curious to see it.

    QUESTION: How many places have you been too before here?

    ARONOFSKY: Too many.

    Question: All over the U.S.?

    ARONOFSKY: Not really, just major cities. San Diego, Boston, D.C., Miami, Dallas.

    QUESTION: If they make you go all over the place they should make you go in a straight line.

    ARONOFSKY: Did Will Smith come through here for Seven Pounds? He seemed to be one city ahead of us. I think he’s doing St. Louis, Cleveland, he does tiny towns. I was talking to his people in Dallas, he comes with a private plane, 4 SUV’s, they got two giant tour buses that are wrapped with the poster and his face.

    (Laughs)

    It’s just like a circus. The fact that he does that at that level just shows you how hard a job it is. I guess he does it for every movie.

    QUESTION: What about Mickey? Did you try to get him to come on this thing?

    ARONOFSKY: I don’t think he could have handled the pace of it. He’s actually 57 years old or so ““ I don’t know how old he is, so don’t quote me on that, I don’t think he can handle it. I’m getting a day off tomorrow and I’m going to stay here. It was between here or going to San Fran. I know what San Fran looks like and I’m so glad I’m staying. I’m going to climb Camelback tomorrow. I’m very excited. And go to the Botanical Gardens, that’s my day.

    QUESTION: Take lots and lots of water.

    [Ed. Note – Keep reading this stream of consciousness. I have no idea who was talking but it’s quite a bizarre, hilarious exchange.]

    ARONOFSKY: Even though it’s cold you have to just keep drinking, right?

    QUESTION: Yes. And Run from the bees.

    ARONOFSKY: What bees? What are you talking about?

    QUESTION: Swarms.

    ARONOFSKY: There are bee swarms?

    QUESTION: Along the mountains there are.

    ARONOFSKY: Really? Tell me more.

    [Ed. Note – Point, Aronofsky]

    QUESTION: Mountain lions, jack-a-lopes.

    ARONOFSKY: Any of you climb that thing?

    QUESTION: Yeah.

    ARONOFSKY: Is it hard?

    CS: No. It’s all relative. You are not running up the mountain.

    ARONOFSKY: Four hours, right?

    CS: No, not a chance. Unless you’re 80 and have a heart condition. Maybe 45 minutes. Depending on how fast you move. Are you taking a leisurely stroll?

    ARONOFSKY: Yeah.

    QUESTION: It’s tougher than Squaw Peak.

    ARONOFSKY: I’ve heard that. That’s been renamed right? Is that because it’s a racist term?

    QUESTION: That was part of why they wanted to rename it. There was just a real outcry that she be recognized, which was nice.

    ARONOFSKY: Who was she?

    QUESTION: Laurie Piestewa was the first Native American killed in combat. She was ambushed with Jessica Lynch.

    ARONOFSKY: Was that the first Iraq war or the second Iraq war?

    QUESTION: That was the second one.

    ARONOFSKY: Jessica Lynch was the second war? This war?

    QUESTION: Yeah, can you believe it?

    ARONOFSKY: When George W. was in office?

    QUESTION: Yeah.

    ARONOFSKY: That’s crazy. That feels like the first war. Really? That’s when we were all pro-war and she was a hero and everything.

    QUESTION: It would be nice to be living in a time when we didn’t have a war.

    ARONOFSKY: Yea. Well that’s these kids. When were you born? 80’s?

    The Massie Twins: ’84.

    ARONOFSKY: Right when the Cold War was winding down. You don’t even remember the Cold War do you? But you’ve heard about it, right?

    The Massie Twins: Yeah. Just what’s in the history books.

    ARONOFSKY: I got arrested in East Berlin.

    CS: Really?

    ARONOFSKY: For stealing an East German flag. I was there on May Day and there were flags everywhere and I told someone I was going to steal a flag. So I lowered a flag and stuffed it down my pants and I hear, “Passport!”

    And they took me to this East German jail. We had to be back across the border by 10:00 PM to get through Checkpoint Charlie. So I was in jail. They took away my shoelaces, took away my belt so I wouldn’t hang myself. It was a concrete room with just a little peephole.

    I was crying.

    I was 17-18 years old. I was just sobbing. And finally they came and said they would let me go if I just raised the flag. I said absolutely. I don’t care. I’ll raise your flag. So we go and me and the Australian kid raised the flag and he said what are you doing because we were raising it upside down.

    (Laughs)

    We walked across Checkpoint Charlie at 1:00 o’clock in the morning.

    Question: That’s amazing.

    ARONOFSKY: It’s a good story though.

  • Trailer Park: End of Year Holiday Cornucopia

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    I’m awesome. I wrote a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

    Merry Christmas, Happy Kwanzaa, Delightful Hanukkah to you all…I’ve got tons to talk about today…

    I think years of doing my favorite trailers has become a little same ol’ same ol’. This time, however, for those keeping track of me as I’ve been doing this column now for almost 5(!) years now it looks like I need to shake it up a little bit. No one hates lists more than me, I rarely do them, so I figure I would just stick in some of the more memorable moments from this last year. From the good to the bad, I figured I would reflect on what 2008 has brought me. So, I’ve interspersed two film reviews, a check-in call from Ray Schillaci along with a DVD giveaway (among the other ones I’m runnin’) as I keep it loose and informal. Should anyone have anything to add as their own BEST/WORST for aught 8 feel free to leave it in the comments section below as I’m interested to hear about your own Best of 08.

    BEST FREE T-SHIRT GIVEN AWAY AT COMIC-CON: THE WATCHMEN

    This shirt made the wait to not only catch the panel that showed some of the best footage that we had seen to that point. Zach Snyder cut together a loose trailer that played more than a few times and, to be honest, it triggered the same response in the crowd as when he played the trailer for 300. To boot, the interviews I did on site right after the panel, even though they were not exclusive, made the trek from Arizona worthwhile. The ravenous scramble for this free piece of merch was not unlike the running of the bulls in Pamplona. Seriously, some of these kids need a Stairmaster or get on some kind of cardio program. I want to see future nerds in better shape than what I’ve been seeing at these conventions.

    Coming in a close second would absolutely have to be the TERMINATOR: SALVATION shirt that was given away after the Terminator panel which surprised even me; I wasn’t expecting much and was more than pleasantly surprised to see what G was up to with this property and, as a topper, a sweet ass shirt to wear to the gym.

    As an aside: Check out Rich Johnston’s WATCHMENSCH comic that is coming soon to your local comics retailer. Not even Alan Moore is above a little parody.

    BEST REASON TO HATE PUBLICISTS: The Kids in the Hall 2008 Tour

    One of the really nice things about writing for this site is that I basically dictate my own material. I lick my thumb, stick it up in the air of my own mind and then determine what way the wind is blowing. For those who know me, which isn’t many of you and I know that, I am a Kids in the Hall mark. I own all their damn DVDs, I drove 6 hours just to see a live show they did years ago, I bought a lot more merchandise than anyone whose name is Mark David Chapman shouldn’t and I have always maintained they really were an influential force in modern sketch comedy. Now, when it was announced they were doing a spring tour I was all about finding a way to talk to one, perhaps all if I was particularly lucky, of the KITH. I figured one PR rep would know the other and that it would be a smooth process. Who would’ve thought that the Kids in the Hall only had one publicist? I was thrilled when I eventually landed to the person who handles them and was actually enthused that I showed an interest in covering their tour. Their publicist wrote back quickly. I was amazed. They were interested. What did I have in mind, they asked. So, I make every possible concession I could in order to get these interviews. I was in rare form; I was giving away the Featured Interview space, I was willing to do these interviews at all hours of the day, I was whoring myself to every degree. All I wanted was some exclusive content and some time with the Kids.

    It worked.

    They wrote back, giving the site some non-exclusive (Hint #1) content and some ambiguous time about when to set all these interviews up (Clue #2). Like a sucker, I posted it. However, they wrote back letting me know how great it was that I posted some generic information linking back to a site that wasn’t ours and content that was branded as such.

    I am absolutely, totally, and completely in love with you. I just thought you should know that before we go any further 🙂

    Seriously, this is great – now we need to get you on the phone with the guys so that you can have some fresh meat for the site beast. Let me get them safely on the road, and then let’s talk about anything and everything you might want to do!

    Thanks again, Christopher – it’s truly a pleasure to work with you on this (I don’t get to say that often!)

    Well, what would you think? Yeah, that you were the f’ing man, I tell you that. And I think you would be right. Who wouldn’t believe that pile of steaming BS? Fast forward 3 weeks of teasing. I was so hungry for this that I thought it was in the bag. The only bag I was in, I take it, was some Nigerian 419 scam. Like a loser I kept going forward and the following e-mail came in when I could tell it wasn’t me she was hoping to hook up but, rather, the overlord of everything here at the site, Mr. Kevin Smith, that they was ultimately interested in. This is speculation but since I never was able to produce the man or even play with the thought of forwarding her half-assed invitation to anyone who I thought would even come close of pushing this up the ladder (the world became clear when I saw the line) I will never know for sure. Why I couldn’t see that this was the first move of the Bad PR person’s Heisman play against me I don’t know…

    Hey!

    I don’t care what you have to do – rent a horse, or a zeppelin, or a trolley car. Get yourself to one of the LA area shows. It will be WORTH the trip, I swear: the new show is fantabulous. The guys are having a blast – we just wrapped up four shows in NY and they’re headed to Texas next to tackle Houston and Dallas.

    Dave has written what is perhaps the most classic, textbook sketch I’ve ever seen him produce – it should be taught on college campuses because it’s that good, and round, and premise-perfect. Bruce has contributed a truly hilarious bit called “Grade 8 Dance” that audiences howl over.

    The Russo brothers directed a clip that’s featured in the show – it’s called “Carfuckers”, which probably gives away the premise a bit. It’s in the main viewer on Funny or Die today (a deal done with the company that produced the piece). Go check it out!

    Not sure how to accomplish this, but we’d love to invite Kevin to the LA show as well – I think we’re going to be hosting a reception afterwards, and it would be good to shake hands and that sort of thing. Can you tell me how I might reach him to invite him too?

    If you’d like to speak to any of the guys, let me know and I’ll arrange it. If you have a preference for one over any other, just tell me and I’ll take care of it on this end.

    Hope you’re doing great – but you shouldn’t be reading this email anymore. You should be on Orbitz right now, booking a flight to LA for May 9 🙂

    SIGNED,

    BAD PUBLICIST

    So, did you all see the interviews? Did any of them materialize? Check out my archives. Then, if you had the opportunity, check out my SEND box in my Yahoo account and tally up every unresponded to e-mail I tossed their way when I felt things were going south after I couldn’t magically produce her real quarry. Again, I realize I’m not from Rolling Stone, I know I don’t write for Slate but this is just another example of why I abhor all the sketchy, over-promising publicists who dangle the carrot and then see which of the litter they can get to bite at it. Invariably I end up being picked last but take a look at the archives this year; I’ll just find someone better to talk to.

    BEST GRAPHIC NOVEL: Too Cool to be Forgotten

    To talk too much about this graphic novel would take away from the funny and heart-breakingly sad moments in this traveling back in time story about one man who revisits his high school years as he tries to kick his smoking addiction and, instead, is given another chance at his formative years. It’s Alex Robinson’s compelling artwork and delicate care with which he handles his characters that make this an easy pick.

    BEST GRAPHIC TRAVELOGUE: Moresukine

    Imagine you are a stranger in a strange land. You don’t speak the language. You want to do as the Romans do but what if you don’t know what it is they really do? You ask the Internet, of course. Dirk Schwieger consulted the ranks of folks who visited his comic blog to offer up things, dares really, that explored Japanese culture and customs. From having Dirk figure out how to use a mechanized toilet to actually using a capsule hotel there are small pieces of real life that show us how the other half really lives. The reason it makes my list as best travelogue of the year is because it’s the kind of work that is absent in so many travel guides or personal narratives. This is one of the best ways to take a fly over of a country and peek into what you or I would be interested in knowing. The bigger question that you should find asking yourself after reading this fascinating book: What would foreigners be dared to do if they’ve never been to America?

    BEST REASON TO THINK THAT SETH ROGEN WAS NOT THE MOST INTERESTING FUNNY MAN OF 2008: Danny McBride

    Did anyone here see Tropic Thunder, Pineapple Express or even The Foot Fist Way? The latter I had to see right after I saw Tropic Thunder as I just savaged the trailer when I first saw it. I didn’t get it and the trailer was horrible in relaying the kind of comedy that Danny dabbles in. He’s irreverent in a way that’s not a soundbite and he’s genuine dead-pan delivery separates him from the rest of the herd.

    FAVORITE INTERVIEW: Danny Boyle

    This cat not only made a movie that would become the movie I took my wife on our 1st date but he was just the nicest and most gregarious person you would ever want to meet in a closed room. Too many times you get stuck in moments that become rote wherein you just want to get your questions answered and your piece posted. Danny wasn’t like that insofar that he had a real openness about him. His genial nature made for a relaxed atmosphere and he was happy as a clam to answer any question asked. It was a dream interview and for him to have been so accessible was reason enough for me to question any “artist” who thinks that in order to be great you have to be elusive.

    BEST REASON TO LOVE PUBLICISTS: Name Redacted

    I worked with a ton of excellent PR firms who helped land interview people from the likes of Henry Rollins (not up yet), Jesse Ventura (not up yet), Darren Aronofsky, Danny Boyle and tons of others through the year. These people don’t like being mentioned by name (but make sure you get their client’s name right!) but I make it a point to always send a thank you e-mail whenever possible to say how much I appreciate them getting me in to do my thing.

    These things don’t happen in a vacuum so it’s nice to recognize those who are merely standing in the way of you and the subject. I don’t know if they appreciate hearing it but it’s important to know there are a few who will go the extra mile to get you your story.

    BEST FILM: The Wrestler

    This film redefined what the word “resonate” means.

    It’s not enough to just talk about the performances on the screen from Mickey Rourke and Marisa Tomei. They’re captivating. What is really of note that explains why so many people have loved this movie is that it stays with you. The moments and words in this film are like oatmeal to your mental ribs; as such, it’s satisfying and you are not left wanting.

    A longer review will be coming but it’s enough to know that this film should be seen by anyone who wants a movie that stirrs you from the inside.

    BEST SURPRISE: Tropic Thunder

    I wasn’t sure what to make of this film when I saw the trailer. It was interesting and it seemed like a goofy comedy.

    And then I saw it.

    The satire, the raw viscera of seeing Steve Coogan’s head held up with Ben Stiller drinking its juices, listening to Robert Downey Jr.’s treatise on going retard, Danny McBride’s turn as a pyromaniac hell bent on visual spectacle and, as a capper, Tom Cruise playing a role that I will go on record as saying it was the best he’s ever done in my eyes (he made me laugh for the 1st time…intentionally).

    WORST INTERVIEW: Dicky Barrett from The Mighty Mighty Bosstones

    I don’t know if he just hated the way I talked or if he didn’t care for the simple questions I was asking but homeboy was not enthused to chat with me about his latest album. They all can’t be winners, I know, but looking back at how curt and matter-of-fact things went reinforced the idea that you just have to be ready for any situation that comes up and to make do with you’re given. Sometimes, that’s not much and this one still spooks me every time I have to do a phoner.

    BEST ADVERTISING CAMPAIGN: The Dark Knight

    Who else got wrapped up in the un-campaign that drew in followers from all over the U.S. of A as people looked for bowling balls, got cakes in the mail, went to campaign rallies for a candidate that didn’t exist and other on-line scavenger hunt that added up to one of the largest films that ever was? I sure did and I loved it. There’s something to be said about marketers that want to take things to the next level and this campaign did not disappoint. For every person who was annoyed by the ploys to get people more and more hyped for this film there is no denying that by the time the movie opened the core audience was ravenous to see what was going to be on the screen. Nolan didn’t disappoint but Bale’s voice came awfully close to ruining the whole mystique.

    BEST REASON TO LOOK FORWARD TO 2009: I’m not sure

    One of the things that make life on this side of the fence so much fun is that you never know what might come out of the year. I’ve had a lot of other small bits that are just too numerous to mention but, like I mentioned, since I am slowly growing tired of critics’ Top 10 list of the year I figured I would try and put this year into a different kind of perspective. At the end of all of this, though, is the appreciation for all of you. You allow me to knock on the virtual doors of publicists everywhere as I wonder whether I’ll be deemed good enough to be let in through their door. With every passing week and every passing interview I hope this process gets easier and easier.

    Now, let’s give away a movie…

    DEATH RACE

    This was a much maligned movie. Some people have problems with it but I don’t share that opinion. The movie was a real gas for what it was and I enjoyed all the incredibly unbelievable and impossible things that went on it. Jason Statham proves why he is the go-to man for these movies and for anyone else to say different has something against genre flicks. Since this is the holidays, I’ll make this really easy for you. E-mail me your name at Christopher_Stipp@Yahoo.com. I’ll choose at random some readers who haven’t already extorted free stuff from me in past few weeks.

    BONUS FEATURES ““ DVD AND BLU-RAYâ„¢ HI-DEF:

    • THEATRICAL AND UNRATED EXTENDED VERSIONS OF THE FILM
    • START YOUR ENGINES: MAKING A DEATH RACE: From pre and post-production to the casting of Jason Statham, this bonus documentary takes viewers on set to see how a huge, stunt-driven Hollywood movie was made.
    • BEHIND THE WHEEL: DISSECTING THE STUNTS: In this featurette, the many jaw-dropping stunts in the film are documented including interviews with the cast and crew.
    • FEATURE COMMENTARY WITH DIRECTOR PAUL W.S. ANDERSON and PRODUCER JEREMY BOLT (Unrated Version Only).

    SYNOPSIS: Terminal Island: The very near future. The world’s hunger for extreme sports and reality competitions has grown into reality TV bloodlust. Now, the most extreme racing competition has emerged and its contestants are murderous prisoners. Tricked-out cars, caged thugs and smoking-hot navigators combine to create a juggernaut series with bigger ratings than the Super Bowl. The rules of the Death Race are simple: Win five events, and you’re set free. Lose and you’re road kill splashed across the Internet. International action star Jason Statham leads the action-thriller’s cast as three-time speedway champion Jensen Ames, an ex-con framed for the murder of his wife. Forced to don the mask of the mythical driver Frankenstein, a Death Race crowd favorite who seems impossible to kill, Ames is given an easy choice by Terminal Island ‘s ruthless Warden Hennessey (Joan Allen): Suit up and drive or never see his little girl again. His face hidden by a hideous mask, he must win the insane three-day challenge in order to gain freedom. But to claim the prize, Ames must survive a gauntlet of the most vicious criminals – including nemesis Machine Gun Joe (Tyrese Gibson) – in the country’s toughest prison. Trained by his coach (Ian McShane) to drive a monster Mustang V8 Fastback outfitted with 2 mounted mini-guns, flamethrowers and napalm, an innocent man must destroy everything in his path to win the most twisted spectator sport on Earth.

    MARLEY & ME: A REVIEW
    I don’t read any newspaper writer whose musings deal with the mundane or observational, I depend on the comedians of the world to skewer day-to-day life in the way that the successful ones can, but I certainly don’t believe that a newspaper columnist’s sense of wonderment at the “ah, shucks” level of life warrants a cinematic envisioning.

    One of the issues I have with MARLEY & ME is its dependence on the dog as a metaphor for all the bad and good things that happen in the lives of Owen Wilson, portraying the milquetoast, middle-of-the-road Andy Rooney like pundit John Grogan. It isn’t that your average canine isn’t capable of imbuing your life with a little bit of humanitarianism, I know I grew up with those commercials that talked about how owning one could help geezers lower their blood pressure, but to have this as the basis for a full length movie where we’re bashed over the head with enough obviousness that this dog represents everything good and fair in this man’s life is a little hokey. I think the movie will play well with those who take stock in books written by Mitch Albom as the reasons why they love reading and why the Hallmark channel still churns out yarns that even Laura Ingalls Wilder would say are obnoxiously sentimental.

    But that’s fine, you see.

    This movie isn’t for me. It’s not even for those who I could engage in a debate about whether THE FOUNTAIN is pure genius (it is) or whether it was an exercise in artful indulgence. This movie is for people like my wife who love movies that want to make you feel all gooey inside, to hell with real conflict or dramatic infusions that would deepen the film’s original meaning. No, instead I get the story of how one irascible and temperamental mutt chews everything these people own as John pines to have the life of his fellow reporter (not columnist. The film will also take its time differentiating these two professions to the point that if you don’t get the difference by the end you have no business watching this) and best friend in human form, Eric Dane. In fact, I would posit that I wish we could have followed the life of Dane as he seems to be going off to Columbia, traveling all over the country, simply living the life of a newspaper Lothario as be beds scads of different women (the movie makes sure to point this out) while Owen Wilson is trapped writing dissertations on whatever people who read the newspaper to get their slice of life read about.

    It’s not so much the mundaneness that I mind, actually I mind it to the point that I wonder why there is a shockingly dangerous moment that is inserted right in the middle of the film, his neighbor is stabbed in her own driveway, if for no other reason than to move the plot as this chunk of actually interesting material is dealt with in such a flippant way I actually feel let down. What an opportunity to deal with the dark underbelly of life in any community where there come the moments when a columnist like John could talk about how this altered his sense of purpose.

    No, it’s just used to talk about how he gets the hell out of his neighborhood.

    I know like it seems I’m being hard on this film for how soft a sell this is going to be for all involved but there are some real wasted opportunities in this movie. As well, you have Jennifer Aniston turning in a performance that is alarmingly casual, someone forgot to tell her this wasn’t just a longer episode of Friends and I am serious when I say that either this woman can’t turn in an actual performance when needed or she’s mildly retarded for not understanding the ways life changes you when you go from no kids to 3 kids and being bitchy doesn’t count as a stretch for the end zone, and let’s also talk about Kathleen Turner. I apologize that I haven’t seen her in anything since WAR AND THE ROSES but I literally rocked backward when I saw Large Marge personified as a dog trainer and realized it was Turner. I’m not sure where she’s been or why she would take a truly thankless role but she turns in a performance that genuinely makes you want to take out your pocketbook to donate to whatever organization has been established to help her get back on her feet. A real reversal of fortunes and the reason why I bring this up is that it’s glaringly obvious to anyone who knows who Turner is. It’s distracting. However, there is a bright light in this film. Alan Arkin. The man can take a role as the editor in charge and turn it into something special. It’s hard to pin down why Arkin is the conduit through which all the life of this thing genuinely flowed through but he’s the real mentor of Grogan. While we don’t get a lot of time with him Arkin doles out the fatherly advice while being the calm voice in the cacophony of averageness.

    To say why the dog isn’t deserving of any real judgment by me in this review would to say that there was something special about the trained animal in this movie. The dog is a dog and in order to make sense of Owen Wilson’s hypothesis about why this dog represents the kind of humanity that warranted this film it is on the shoulders of all the other actors in this piece to make him relevant. Unfortunately, everyone is too busy chewing up their own scenery that the dog is an afterthought until it’s time for the movie’s penultimate moment. And the moment isn’t deserved. It’s rushed, it’s hokey and it doesn’t do anything to contextualize the almost 2 hours I spent trying to figure out the answer the question of why we’re watching a movie about a dog. Any answer wouldn’t be a good one as this film would belong better on ABC, interspersed with commercials for Purina Puppy Chow.

    VALKYRIE: A REVIEW

    The sooner you realize that Kenneth Branagh isn’t really in this movie the better you’ll be off in realizing what is at issue with this film.

    Branagh is billed second in the movie’s IMDB page and it made we wonder as I watched this movie about why that’s the case. I hope I’m not spoiling anything by saying that we only see him as he takes the first crack at killing Der Fuhrer in this film, a token appearance later and then once more in a moment where he’s all by himself at the end of the picture. I just couldn’t grasp why there was such a Houdini act with some of the players of this film but it’s really representative of why this movie only deserves to be a thriller when you look at the last half of the movie, the first half deserving to be lost in whatever editing bay it came out of.

    The problem with the first half is that we have a few issues that need hammering out. First of which is why Tom Cruise’s portrayal as Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg starts off with a rather compelling moment in his career, a real watershed that made him the linchpin of this whole attempt to kill Adolf Hitler (an attempt that would the last one and 9 months before he committed suicide before the allies had the chance to grab him), and I don’t know if it was brevity or the fact that they were running short on time but the man flips awfully fast. The way in which Cruise is approached and the manner in which he accepts not only the offer to kill Hitler, never once minding the fact that his family’s life, his children and his wife, would then be targets on the acceptance of this opportunity, but the swiftness from how he goes from conflicted military man to full on freedom fighter is alarming. It defies any sense of logic if you were to wonder what it would take to get you to kill your own president if you happened to have a beef with what your government represented.

    The second problem of the first half is its History channel treatment of the events that took place leading up to the assassination attempt. I was less shocked at the swiftness of Cruise’s acceptance to be a party to off Hitler than I was at the cold and detached nature in which we’re treated to everything that leads up to the film’s exciting second half. To wit, Cruise and his German buddies want to rewrite the failsafe plan, Valkyrie, which would go into effect should Hitler be pronounced dead. Long story short, and this is a really long explanation that goes to support the claim the 1st half is nothing but a long litany of factoids punctuated with moments of superficial sentimentality between Cruise and his wife/family, Cruise needs to get Adolf to sign off on the altered plans for Valkyrie as this is the first step in seizing control of the country after they kill him. The issue becomes that this tense moment should have been a true jewel of the film but it’s treated, honestly, like the re-enactment all the players involved were probably trying to avoid.

    Now, as much as Cruise has been maligned in the production of this film in the press I can tell you that it’s all unfounded. It’s not Cruise that is the problem here as he submits a solid, bombastic free turn as this ripped from the history book figure. He’s honestly one of the best parts of the movie. His quick flip not withstanding Cruise is a delight as the man who would try everything he could in order to defeat and kill the personification of evil. The second half is his, thankfully, and one of the things that adds to the movie’s distinctions as an honorable thriller in the true sense of the word is that it’s near bloodless. The entire last half hinges on how well the movie can propel itself forward without resorting to the usual violent trappings of other WWII film not to mention that they’re having to depend on actual events which were, themselves, bloodless to begin with.

    Thankfully the intrigue that follows as soon as the final plan is put into motion is indescribable. The events on the screen surely can be described, and they are as if we were following the 9/11 time line, but it is the nuances of Cruise as he plays von Stauffenberg, lurching ever closer to fulfilling what he went out to do and then how he deals with the aftermath. Cruise displays the kind of chameleon like qualities that warranted him a Golden Globe nomination in TROPIC THUNDER. The reason why that worked so well, and why actors like Robert Downey Jr. gained some attention, is that they gave themselves to the parts they were playing. Tom Cruise gave in to what von Stauffenberg was about in a way that not only felt genuine but impressed me with his taciturn delivery of the film’s key moments when it isn’t words that pay off, it’s the expressions that do.

    And I think this is why I’m so disappointed with the end result of what we have. You have Cruise leading the charge to make this movie so much more than just a re-creation, what this film mostly feels like, but everyone else on the periphery just feels like British (Branagh, Bill Nighy, Terence Stamp) and American (Tom Wilkinson dominating everyone else) actors just playing their parts. If you look at why a film like SAVING PRIVATE RYAN worked so well or why DOWNFALL starring Bruno Ganz was so affecting it really comes down to how well you cast your parts. In RYAN you had a clear verbal demarcation that Americans, well, were going to sound like Americans while the Germans, we all remember the one that gets away and comes back to haunt Hanks and Co., were going to sound like Germans. In DOWNFALL there wasn’t any of that clap-trap going on. It was a full-on German production that cut right to the core of bringing to life as to why this was a sinister regime that needed to die; I would dare any of you to find a better Hitler anywhere else on the screen who manages a 1/10th of the evil that Bruno Ganz brings to life.

    VALKYRIE doesn’t have any of that. We have countries of all kinds filling in for the Germans and while I guess that works fine for some people it’s a distraction to others. It was to me and it took away from what should have been a movie about the last throes of Adolf Hitler, the walls slowly and steadily closing in on the Nazi party while a pack of men seek to euthanize it sooner rather than later. Instead we have a movie that won’t make you too angry that you just spent $10 on a story that could have been delivered so much better if everyone else shared the passion Tom Cruise delivers throughout the entire production.

    And let’s finish out the year by letting Ray Schillaci get the last word…


    Don’t Judge a Movie by its Title

    When was the last time you sat in a movie theater and found that you discovered something special? A future talent that could get you excited again to go to the movies rather than wait to see it on DVD. Someone who you could look forward to screaming out, “Ya gotta see this person’s work!”

    I remember the debut of “Tattooed Love Boys” by the Pretenders or “Psycho Killer” by the Talking Heads and running out and telling all my friends that these people were going to leave a mark in the music industry. I was shunned in the beginning. They did not have the foresight. The same went with a little Canadian horror show entitled, “Shivers”. I raised my glass to its fledgling director, David Cronenberg. Once again, my friends abandoned me. But they thought I maybe on to something when I lead them to a little known street thriller called “Assault on Precinct 13″ directed by newbie John Carpenter. I was finally vindicated with the sneak preview of Carpenter’s next outing, “Halloween” which all of us jammed the theater time and time again.

    Later, I would find some really cool minor “B” classics that my friends looked forward to me recommending which included “The Hidden” and “Vice Squad”. The talent might not have moved onto greater things but there was no denying the raw power behind the creative force. This leads me to introducing a must-see movie (for all you horror/action/suspense fans) and director that I happened to catch at the International Horror and Sci-Fi Film Festival in Phoenix last month.

    The title is terribly misleading, and the director and writers have nothing to do with it. Unfortunately, it is the product of an unimaginative marketing department, which could hurt this fantastic fun film. The title alone had me dread going into the theater for the viewing, but its director, Ben Rock was such a nice sincere guy who had a genuine love and wonderful knowledge of the genre it peaked my interest enough to give it 10 minutes or so.

    Boy, what a surprise! Ben Rock’s “Alien Raiders” KICKS ASS!! This movie is everything we love about escaping into a dark movie theater ““ the adrenalin rush, the unnerving creepiness that almost makes you want to close your eyes, but you’re too excited to see what the director has up his sleeve next. I’m sorry if I’m raising expectations too high, but I went in expecting low-rent, unimaginative Roger Corman or worse Uwe Boll. This movie has it all, engaging characters, an eerie setting and a director at the helm that is ready to take you on a roller coaster ride you won’t soon forget. There are images that stay in your mind (empty supermarket aisles, a handwritten blood-stained window front, to name a few) and make you wonder, “What’s next?”

    If it was not for the lame title, we the audience would start off thinking this were a possible political/terrorist thriller. That soon changes after ten minutes and we get a hint of something out of a cool X-Files episode. I’ll be brief and stay to my m.o. of being spoiler free. A small band, of what appears to be, masked militants break into a sleepy little town’s supermarket and begin a hostage situation along with a couple of chilling killings. This is not by-the-book suspense. The scene is unnerving and is like watching Hitchcock for the first time. Don’t worry; Rock does not get carried away with himself with this wonderful piece of pulp. He tends to throw in quips and situations that elicit nervous laughs and make one enjoy the ride. Adding to the fun are not only a team of talented writers and crew, but a great cast lead by Carlos Bernard (of “24” fame) as well.

    Turns out, our militants are actually rogue scientists seeking out a very dangerous group of aliens disguised as human beings. I know, sounds bargain-basement, but Rock and crew elevate the tale much like “The Hidden” did, which became a sleeper at the box office and went on to spawn a sequel. Yes, the story has many elements that we will recognize from other films (The Mist, The Hidden, Carpenter’s The Thing, to name a few), but in many ways we end up appreciating it more than some of the bigger budgeted and CGI ridden spectacles that have trashed our theaters of late.

    At the Q&A a couple of people had some great suggestions for replacement titles, Raw Feed and Warner Brothers should take note (because you have huge potential with this Rock and his film). One tongue-in-cheek title proved to be fun and go along with the tone of the film, “Clean Up in Aisle 13″. But the one that won me over was a wonderful play on words “Aisle 51″. The entire setting is in a supermarket, much like “The Mist” but contains far more dread and proves to be much more satisfying.

    I urge all of you to email or write Raw Feed and Warner Brothers and push for a theatrical release, rather than the usual direct-to-video. This film deserves to be seen on the big screen having its audience scream and laugh with it. Hopefully a title change will ensue, a theatrical release date will be granted and I (along with many others) will see a sign of cinematic hope from a bottom-dollar industry that caters to bigger budget fare that lacks the creativeness that Ben Rock, cast & crew have displayed.