Tag: kids in the hall

  • A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Paul Myers 3

    bitofachat-header.png

    lucyline.gif

    I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

    In this episode, I have another chat with musician/writer Paul Myers, about The Kids In The Hall, beer Christmas, secret Canadians, trying lives, compartmentalizing, and being easy adjacent.

    Hope you enjoy…

    Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Paul Myers 3“:

    [audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-paul_myers_3.mp3]

    (PREVIOUSLY: A Bit Of A Chat with Paul Myers, A Bit Of A Chat with Paul Myers 2)

    SUBSCRIBE
    Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

    ##

    patreon-fred.png

    Drop Ken a line HERE.

    ##

    You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

    lucyline.gif

  • Contest Round-Up: 2011-06-09

    contestheader.jpg

    Welcome to our weekly round-up of featured giveaways here at FRED. Every week, we’ll present a new clutch of DVDs, books, and other cool stuff you can take a shot at winning. All you have to do is click on the graphics below to be taken to their respective contest pages. And good luck!

    In conjunction with A&E Home Video, we’re giving away two (2) copies of THE KIDS IN THE HALL: THE COMPLETE SERIES on DVD.

    In conjunction with A&E Home Video, we’re giving away two (2) copies of THE KIDS IN THE HALL: DEATH COMES TO TOWN on DVD.

    In conjunction with A&E Home Video, we’re giving away two (2) copies of REAGAN on DVD.

    In conjunction with History Channel Home Video, we’re giving away two (2) copies of BRAD METZLER’S DECODED: SEASON 1 on DVD.

    In conjunction with History Channel Home Video, we’re giving away two (2) copies of ICE ROAD TRUCKERS: DEADLIEST ROADS – SEASON 1 on Blu-Ray.

    In conjunction with Nickelodeon Home Video, we’re giving away three (3) copies of FANBOY & CHUM CHUM on DVD.

    In conjunction with Fox Home Video, we’re giving away one (1) copy of BURN NOTICE: SEASON 4 on DVD.

    In conjunction with Fox Home Video, we’re giving away one (1) copy of WHITE COLLAR: SEASON 2 on DVD.

    In conjunction with Universal Home Video, we’re giving away ten (10) copies of AMERICAN GRAFFITI on Blu-Ray.

    In conjunction with Underground Toys and Thinkgeek, we’re giving away two (2) DOCTOR WHO: ADIPOSE PLUSH TOYS.

  • Win THE KIDS IN THE HALL: DEATH COMES TO TOWN on DVD!

    contestheader.jpg

    In conjunction with A&E Home Video, we’re giving away two (2) copies of THE KIDS IN THE HALL: DEATH COMES TO TOWN on DVD.

    Contest ends at 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, June 29th.

    Enter the contest!
    Email:
    First name:
    Last name:
    Street Address:
    Address Line 2 (if needed):
    City:
    State/Province/Whatever:
    Zip Code/Postal Code:
    Country:
    Birth Month:
    Birth Day:
    Birth Year:

    Official Rules

    No member of FRED Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

    No Purchase necessary to win.

    Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

    One entry per day, per person.

    All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, June 29th.

    The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

  • Win THE KIDS IN THE HALL: THE COMPLETE SERIES on DVD!

    contestheader.jpg

    In conjunction with A&E Home Video, we’re giving away two (2) copies of THE KIDS IN THE HALL: THE COMPLETE SERIES on DVD.

    Contest ends at 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, June 29th.

    Enter the contest!
    Email:
    First name:
    Last name:
    Street Address:
    Address Line 2 (if needed):
    City:
    State/Province/Whatever:
    Zip Code/Postal Code:
    Country:
    Birth Month:
    Birth Day:
    Birth Year:

    Official Rules

    No member of FRED Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

    No Purchase necessary to win.

    Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

    One entry per day, per person.

    All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, June 29th.

    The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

  • Weekend Shopping Guide 5/27/11: The Little Gnome

    weekendshopping.png

    The weekend’s here. You’ve just been paid, and it’s burning a hole in your pocket. What’s a pop culture geek to do? In hopes of steering you in the right direction to blow some of that hard-earned cash, it’s time for the FRED Weekend Shopping Guide – your spotlight on the things you didn’t even know you wanted…

    (Please support FRED by using the links below to make any impulse purchases – it helps to keep us going…)

    It was seen as a strident, preachy end to The Little Tramp when it originally premiered, but the years have proven what lovely political stand Charlie Chaplin was taking with The Great Dictator (Criterion, Not Rated, Blu-Ray-$39.95 SRP), released while the US was still actively avoiding entry into Europe’s war. The new Criterion edition features a beautiful print of the film with enhanced sound, plus an audio commentary, an in-depth documentary, visual essays, color production footage, a pair of Barbershop sequences that predate the famous one in the film, and the re-release trailer. A brilliant, must-have addition to your high-def library.

    thinkgeek-01.jpg

    If you’re not wanting to spring for an expensive pad but you need to eliminate heat build-up under your laptop, try the Cool Feet Airpsace For Laptops ($9.99), which is simply a quartet of suction-cupped feet that attach to the bottom of your laptop. Simple as that.

    thinkgeek-02.jpg

    It’s always a beautiful thing to see two actors at the top of their game, particularly when they’re both in the same film. Papillon (Warner Bros., Rated PG, Blu-Ray-$34.99 SRP) is not only a great prison escape film whose arrival to high definition is most welcome, but it also features Dustin Hoffman and Steve McQueen at their powerful peak, lighting up every scene they share. Sadly, bonus materials are limited to a featurette and the theatrical trailer, but having the film look and sound this good is good enough for me.

    blankguide.gif

    It’s not Pixar, but Gnomeo & Juliet (Touchstone, Rated G, 3DBlu-Ray-$49.99 SRP) doesn’t want to be a work of art – it just wants to be a fun, funny romp, which it is. C’mon, telling a Romeo & Juliet riff with garden gnomes and other assorted backyard denizens is just goofy enough to be enjoyable. Bonus materials include alternate endings, deleted scenes, featurettes, and a music video. And really, if you’re in the least bit a smart shopper, you’ll go ahead and purchase the 3D release, as the set contains not only the multidimensional marvel disc, but also the standard 2D Blu-Ray and the old-fangled DVD, as well. It just makes sense.

    blankguide.gif

    If you’re looking for pulse-pounding cinematic science fiction, you’re not going to find it in Andrei Tarkovsky’s Solaris (Criterion, Not Rated, Blu-Ray-$39.95 SRP), which has made the transition to high definition courtesy of the fine folks at Criterion. However, if you like the psychological drama and mystery of a more recent film like Moon, you’ll probably enjoy this. Bonus materials include an audio commentary, interviews, a documentary excerpt, and deleted scenes.

    blankguide.gif

    If Apocalypse Now is the operatic version of the Vietnam War, then Oliver Stone’s Platoon (MGM, Rated R, Blu-Ray-$29.99 SRP) tries to more closely approximate the gritty reality from the perspective of an actual veteran. Though, I have to say, I still prefer Apocalypse, but having Stone’s film in high definition is a nice addition. Bonus materials include audio commentaries, deleted/extended scenes, featurettes, documentaries, TV spots, and the theatrical trailer.

    blankguide.gif

    If you’ve held off on picking The Kids In The Hall: The Complete Series (A&E, Not Rated, DVD-$99.95 SRP) because the box was just too big for you, now’s the time to pick up this must-have set, as it’s been slimmed down considerably and also now includes the 8-part IFC miniseries that reunited the guys, Death Comes To Town. The sets is also packed with interviews, audio commentary, best-of compilations, rare sketches, and more.

    blankguide.gif

    Studios can latch onto just about any day and turn it into an excuse to release a special anniversary edition of one of their catalogue titles, and Warners has done just that with a pair of new-to-Blu-Ray titles ostensibly making their debut to commemorate the 150th anniversary of the Civil War – Gettysburg (Warner Bros., Not Rated, Blu-Ray-$34.99 SRP) & Gods & Generals (Warner Bros., Rated PG-13, Blu-Ray-$34.99 SRP). Both feature the extended director’s cuts, plus audio commentaries, featurettes, trailers, and more.

    blankguide.gif

    Long before Days of Thunder or Hal Needham, Grand Prix (Warner Bros., Not Rated, Blu-Ray-$19.98 SRP) was the first film that really tried to – and succeeded in – capturing the speed and energy of car racing. The fact that it also starred the ever-likable James Garner was also a definite plus. Besides a lovely high definition transfer, the special edition features 5 in-depth featurettes and the theatrical trailer.

    blankguide.gif

    While Warners releases Grand Prix on Blu-Ray, Paramount digs up the Steve McQueen racing movie Le Mans (Paramount, Rated G, Blu-Ray-$24.99 SRP) which featured McQueen doing much of his own racing as a driver determined to win the famous race the year after a devastating accident. Bonus materials include a making-of featurette and the theatrical trailer.

    blankguide.gif

    Previously available, for some reason you can now pick up a standalone edition of Sylvester Stallone’s Rocky (MGM, Rated PG, Blu-Ray-$34.98 SRP) that drops all of the bonus materials available on previous editions, substituting in collectible booklet packaging. Very odd.

    blankguide.gif

    Has the Royal Wedding already come and gone? So fast! If you’d like to relive all of the memories, the BBC has put together an overview of their coverage titled, appropriately, The Royal Wedding: William & Catherine (BBC, Not Rated, DVD-$9.98 SRP), running over 2 hours and including a 50-minute documentary about their courtship. However, if you prefer a dramatized version of that courtship, there’s the Lifetime original movie William & Kate (Lifetime, Not Rated, DVD-$19.95 SRP), which does exactly what it says on the tin.

    blankguide.gif

    As kids growing up in the 80’s, I think we knew instinctively when something was a low-rent rip-off of a far more popular property, and that’s exactly what I felt about the Gobots, which were the bane of any kid hoping to get a Transformers figure from a clueless (often frugal) parent. Relive just how sad the rip-off was with Warner Archive’s release of the original miniseries Challenge Of The Gobots (Warner Bros., Not Rated, DVD-$14.95).

    blankguide.gif

    While I wouldn’t say it’s a great, must-see film, I Am Number Four (Touchstone, Rated PG-13, Blu-Ray-$44.99 SRP) was at least enough of a thriller and featured enough unexpected twists to keep me interested, which is a lot more than most films can do. It’s almost as if producer Michael Bay remembered how to make a film. Bonus materials include deleted scenes, a featurette, and bloopers.

    blankguide.gif

    I think the most endearing thing about Nickelodeon’s CG-animated series Fanboy & Chum Chum (Paramount, Not Rated, DVD-$16.99 SRP) is its unbridled giddy exuberance. It’s just a fun, funny, raucous good time. I just wish the initial release was more than 8 episodes. Bonus features include animated shorts and the pilot episode for the Jimmy Neutron spin-off Planet Sheen.

    blankguide.gif

    Have running out of ice roads to be anticlimactic on, the franchise has decided to further move the whole affair into artifice by dropping the drivers into crazy dangerous roads around the world with the first season of IRT Deadliest Roads (History Channel, Not Rated, Blu-Ray-$34.95 SRP). The 3-disc set contains all 10 episodes, plus additional footage.

    blankguide.gif

    Via rare archival footage and personal interviews, the History Channel documentary Reagan (History Channel, Not Rated, DVD-$19.95 SRP) seeks to paint a balanced portrait of our 40th President. You’ll ultimately walk away with your own view on the man and his presidency, but it’s an interesting piece nonetheless.

    blankguide.gif

    You know, if they’d actually given half an effort to make Brad Meltzer’s Decoded (History Channel, Not Rated, DVD-$29.95 SRP) into the Mythbusters of conspiracy theories, it might actually be a worthwhile show. Instead, it’s a collection of crackpot theories poorly investigated into half-assed conclusions. Sad, really.

    blankguide.gif

    Before he moved on to making big-budget blasé blockbusters, Ron Howard put his child actor past behind him as part of Roger Corman’s stable of actor/filmmakers, as the latest double feature release from the Corman Collection will enlighten you with Eat My Dust/Grand Theft Auto (Shout Factory, Not Rated, DVD-$19.93 SRP). Dust starred Howard, while Grand Theft Auto both starred and was his directorial debut. Bonus features include audio commentaries, interviews, an intro from Corman, and TV spots.

    blankguide.gif

    So there you have it… my humble suggestions for what to watch, listen to, play with, or waste money on this coming weekend. See ya next week…

    -Ken Plume

    ##

  • Trailer Park: Dave Foley of THE STRIP

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    I was able to sit down for a couple of years and pump out a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

    Check out my new column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

    sita-sings-the-blues-dvdSita Sings the Blues – Quick Review

    Sooooo….this is awkward.

    I want to start off by making clear my stance on this DVD is that you should buy it. Go right out and purchase it any which way you can.

    My second point is that not only is this a movie the venerable Roger Ebert reviewed glowingly on his blog a year ago but you can go on the film’s website and watch it for free.

    Like Roger, I didn’t really have a strong passion to sit down with this film and consume it immediately. I got to it when it got to it as I didn’t really know what this movie was about, I was intrigued by the idea that this an animated film in the 2D vein, and wasn’t at all familiar with the filmmaker, Nina Paley. As Paley states, this film “is a musical, animated personal interpretation of the Indian epic the Ramayana” which focuses on, “the relationship between Sita and Rama, who are gods incarnated as human beings, and even they can’t make their marriage work.” Avatar this isn’t but this movie is brilliant. Utterly brilliant.

    With a humorous and fascinating tone, the movie lays out the mythology of a Hindu epic that millions of people know but might not make sense to us Westerners who might not be familiar with the faith of people who live half way across the globe. The brilliance is not only the animation which just pops and makes you believe that Pixar does not have a corner on the market of evocative storytelling through this medium but Paley embeds her own personal story on top of this larger one.

    Paley inserts herself into this film as she draws comparisons to these gods who become man and wife, their marriage unable to be one that’s stable or cohesive. Her own marriage, in the real world, crumbles and she uses this movie as a way to work through her own issues. As well, we have a couple of irreverent narrators who help school us on the whole mythological business in a way that is downright hilarious and poignant, almost like being taught by two professors who can’t seem to agree on anything but possess a deep knowledge of the very subject we’re here to learn about,  and the end result is a movie that defies any kind of linear explanation but it is that very defiance that makes this a movie that I would positively put into my top 5 animated films of 2009. It’s a must see and I cannot express enough the notion you should at least watch a little bit online and, if so moved, purchase the DVD. You cannot go wrong.

    Product Description:

    NEW YORK, NY ““ When filmmaker Nina Paley couldn’t make her marriage work, she decided to use it as fodder for an ambitious project: a musical, animated and personal interpretation of the Indian epic, the Ramayana.  The highly acclaimed, award-winning result, SITA SINGS THE BLUES, tells two parallel stories: the ancient Hindu story of a god and goddess and Paley’s 21st century break-up, stunningly woven together utilizing flash animation, original watercolor paintings, rotoscoping techniques and imaginative musical interludes which link the narratives 3000 years apart.

    In SITA SINGS THE BLUES, the Hindu goddess (and namesake of the film) is the leading lady of the Ramayana, a dutiful wife who follows her husband, Rama, on a 14 year exile, only to be kidnapped by an evil king from Sri Lanka .  Despite remaining faithful to her husband, Sita is forced to endure many trying tests.  Fast forward to modern times, where artist Nina (the filmmaker herself) discovers parallels in Sita’s life when her husband — in India on a work project — decides to break up their marriage and dump her via email.  With narration and hilarious commentary by a trio of Indonesian shadow puppets, both the ancient tragedy and modern comedy are married in this beautifully animated interpretation of the epic, which is also enlivened by grand musical numbers choreographed to a cross-cultural and eclectic mix of 1920’s jazz vocals from Annette Hanshaw and Indian fusion.

    In SITA ““ Paley’s first feature length film and one amazingly created entirely from her home studio, using standard-issue computers and over-the-counter software — multiple narrative and visual styles (such as Mughal paintings and temple sculptures to comic books) have been juxtaposed to create a highly entertaining, yet moving, vision of the Ramayana which comes to lavish life with a cast of hundreds: flying monkeys, evil monsters, gods, goddesses, warriors, sages, and winged eyeballs.  Universally acclaimed and winner of over 30 awards from festivals the world over ““ including the prestigious Silver Bear from Berlin and the “Best Film Not Playing at a Theater Near You” Award at the Gotham Awards, SITA SINGS THE BLUES was also invited into the American Film Institute’s prestigious program, AFI PROJECT 20/20, designed to enhance cultural exchange and understanding, by bringing together filmmakers and their films from the US and abroad.

    Whether encountering the Ramayana for the first time or revisiting a familiar cultural icon, home audiences will be fascinated, enthralled, entertained and moved by SITA, a tale of truth, justice and a woman’s cry for equal treatment that deftly earns its tagline as “The Greatest Break-Up Story Ever Told.”

    DVD Extras: Director’s commentary and interview, the bonus Paley short film “Fetch!” and more

    INGLORIOUS BASTERDS – Giveaway

    inglourious-basterds-movie-poster-11With no hesitation or hyperbole I can state that Inglorious Basterds was in my top 5 films of 2009. This movie could have been released on DVD without so much as any promotion as it certainly doesn’t need my help in saying how utterly brilliant it was.

    Christoph Waltz deserves much of the acting kudos this film receives, not that everyone else really brought their A game to a film that Quentin Tarantino obviously had a fun time creating, but the production values and script are brought together in a maelstrom of what could be said is 2009’s answer to what could be called Best Picture. My fluffery aside, I do have a few more copies of the movie to give away along with some metallic Basterds branded shot glasses and faux blood spattered baseball pens (which you can see here: http://twitpic.com/to9i9). I’ve got tons of these tchotchkes to give out so shoot me a line at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com and let me know if you want to be entered to win.

    Now, unless you’ve been living under a rock or have an aversion to movie theaters and pop culture here is the film’s description to see if you want to enter this contest:

    Inglourious Basterds begins in German-occupied France, where Shosanna Dreyfus (Mélanie Laurent) witnesses the execution of her family at the hand of Nazi Colonel Hans Landa (Christoph Waltz). Shosanna narrowly escapes and flees to Paris, where she forges a new identity as the owner and operator of a cinema.

    Elsewhere in Europe, Lieutenant Aldo Raine (Brad Pitt) organizes a group of Jewish soldiers to engage in targeted acts of retribution. Known to their enemy as “The Basterds,” Raine’s squad joins German actress and undercover agent Bridget Von Hammersmark (Diane Kruger) on a mission to take down the leaders of The Third Reich. Fates converge under a cinema marquee, where Shosanna is poised to carry out a revenge plan of her own…

    Criss Angel:  Mindfreak -Collectors Edition

    mind1Ok, I am not going to posture and say that Angel is my favorite magician of all time.

    In fact, I don’t have a favorite magician of all time and I realize that they themselves don’t want to be called magicians but that’s neither here nor there as I barely know who Criss Angel is. Besides the blown out hair, the chunky jewelry, the guyliner, and the Jersey sensibility to not want to don a shirt (seriously, what is in the water on the east coast that makes clothing such as a shirt repellent to these cats?) the guy is good. In fact, he’s one of the best up close-and-personal illusionists I’ve ever sat down and watched and, without question, this show sparks all kinds of curiosity out of my kids. They we’re glued to what Criss does on the camera, and as we plowed through well over a dozen discs in this set, they were just as fascinated with the first one as they were with the last one.

    Tricks, sleight of hand, and visual oddities abound in this show that does make you scratch your head to think about how he is able to be in things that blow up, how he can pass through glass. There is obviously a very logical explanation to all of this but Criss, love him or hate him, makes it a great show to simply watch to be amazed. Much like Christopher Nolan’s The Prestige the trick is not so much the trick itself but the way in which it happens. Criss’ skill is how he covers up any way to figure out what he’s doing or how he’s doing it and, God love him, kept me guessing through every damn frustrating episode where I couldn’t figure it all out.

    This set collects every episode that he’s done and should absolutely be seen as a present to yourself if you’re a fan of the series or, if you have the scratch, get it for that special someone in your life. While the seasons seem predicated on topping the one that came before it, you can see the level of spectacle get bigger and more engaging as the time wears on. Obviously, going from Season 1 to the present is the way to go here there is still the interesting activity of watching Criss evolve as an entertainer. That said, the one real grand extra that I found most delightful is the Inside the Mind of Criss Angel which is just a great documentary on the man himself which provides one of the better insights into the guy a lot of people know only from tabloid reports.

    A product description:

    The #1 Mystifier of all time presents the definitive 15-DVD Collector’s Edition set of the A&E hit series CRISS ANGEL MINDFREAK. Criss Angel’s unique art form pushes creative, physical and mental boundaries, earning him the reputation as one of the most innovative artists of his day and the Houdini of the 21st Century. Each mind-boggling episode in this 15-DVD set captures the creative master at work as he prepares for some of the most mind-blowing illusions, death defying escapes and astonishing physical feats ever attempted.

    Whether he’s floating above the Luxor, escaping from a speeding truck filled with explosives, levitating ordinary people through their TV sets, walking on water or hanging by fish hooks through his flesh from a helicopter 1,000 feet above ground, Criss blurs the line between reality and illusion like no other artist in the world.

    This astounding collection includes every breathtaking episode from Seasons 1-5, the Halloween Special and a bonus disc featuring 6 episodes never-before-released on DVD – all packaged in a stunning collectible gift case.

    * Features all every episode from CRISS ANGEL: MINDFREAK® in collectable pop-up packaging.
    * 15 DVD – Includes five episodes never before release on DVD, plus the Halloween special

    Bonus features include: Six New-to-DVD Episodes; Episode Commentaries With Criss Angel; Interactive Illusions Through Your Television Screen; “Inside the Mind of Criss Angel” Interview; Criss Angel’s Step-by-Step Guide to Creating Your Own Illusions; Featurettes “Teach a Trick,” “Interviews,” “Practical Jokes,” “Criss Angel Special Gifts,” “Criss Uncensored,” “Criss’ Celebrity Guests”; Behind-the-Scenes Footage; Additional Scenes; Two “Best-Of” Episodes: “Uncut” and “Up Close”; Photo Gallery; Text Biography

    Get Your MINDFREAK On!

    American Pie Presents: The Book of Love – Giveaway

    bookSo, I don’t know much about this film and won’t purport to know different so whether it’s a decent direct to DVD film or if it’s another tired entry into this series. But, I do know Eugene Levy is back again so that has to count for something, right?

    I am giving away five (5) copies of the movie on DVD and all you have to do is shoot me a note at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com and let me know if you want to be entered into the contest to win one.

    Film Description:

    When three East Great Falls High buddies accidentally discover the legendary “Book of Love”, penned by some of their school’s alumni, they embark on a hilariously outrageous quest to lose their virginity with the girls of their dreams. Join Jim’s Dad (Eugene Levy) and this lovable and outrageous group of guys in this raucous comedy full of shocking and heartwarming fun!

    “Utterly hilarious and outrageous!””“ Buzz McClain, Playboy.com

    Dave Foley – Interview – Part 1

    I have to give Kids in the Hall every bit of credit for pouring the foundation of my funny bone.

    Thanks to its irreverence and wicked sensibility I found the bar for what’s possible with sketch comedy and filmed bits raised to heights that many who have come after them simply cannot match. While The Kids had an advantage of not having to be on every week like Saturday Night Live it still trumps a vast majority of what passes for funny nowadays.

    While the show drove me to learn how navigate Internet newsgroups in the early 90’s just so I could geek out with like-minded nerds on a daily basis I can say that the show still holds a special place in the pantheon of great shows as judged by me. Dave Foley went on to become one of the most successful Kids when he landed on Newsradio shortly after Kids in the Hall stopped as he would stay there for the next five seasons, earning him critical kudos for his turn as Dave Nelson. A markedly different Foley, compared to the roles he performed with The Kids, allowed those around him to become stars in their own right as he once again rode the wave of success all the way through that series, films, and opportunities that have ballasted him all the way though the 90’s and into the aughts.

    Dave Foley now stars in The Strip, a comedy in which Foley finds himself in the center of an ensemble of a cast of characters who all share some kind of disdain for having to work in a miserable, low-end electronics store. The movie has some laughs and is worth checking out if you can catch it in a theater near you. Dave is also going to be in The Kids in the Hall: Death Comes to Town that debuts in January on the CBC and represents the first time all the Kids are back on the air since the show went away almost a decade and a half ago. We chat about The Strip, Death, and what it’s like to be the elder statesman on the set of a indie comedy.

    dave1CHRISTOPHER STIPP:  Dave?

    DAVE FOLEY: Yeah.  You sound surprised.

    CS:  No, I  was just waiting.  I’m totally bubbling with anticipation.

    FOLEY: Well, I hope not to disappoint.

    CS:  I don’t think you can.  I tried to figure out how many ways I could say ““ I’m a huge fan and I’ve been following you now for now what’s going over two decades.

    FOLEY: Well, that’s a fine way to say it.

    (Laughs)

    CS:  I don’t know if I should say your eminence, your holiness”¦

    FOLEY:  Any of those is a somewhat an understatement but perfectly acceptable.

    (Laughs)

    CS:  I saw the movie a couple days ago and I’m a big fan of the film.  I think I was expecting something like a mad, sort of a Keystone cops sort of movie. One where I think a lot of people have grown accustomed to nowadays”¦

    FOLEY: You mean where a girls pants get torn off?

    (Laughs)

    CS:  It’s a quieter film.  It’s a comedy but not a seriously in your face kind of film.

    FOLEY: It’s a very low key, character based comedy.  It’s more in a Rushmore vein than in another vein.  More Rushmore than Porkies.  How’s that?

    CS:  Yes, I would agree with that.  Did you see that when you read the script?  Leap out at you that it wasn’t what is de rigueur in the world of comedy nowadays?

    FOLEY:  I like that it’s really a character study, you know?  All the comedy comes out of these personalities  who all know each other because they share a crappy job together.  So I liked the premise to it.  We don’t wind up dealing with with the mafia or abducted by aliens or anything.

    CS:  No vampires?

    FOLEY: No vampires at all.  He ends up on a crazy road trip.  All comedy is based in real life which I really like.

    CS:  Oddly enough, I was researching those surrounding you in this film and realize that director/writer Jameel Khan ““ this is his first foray into really anything.  Was there any hesitation?  How did you come in contact with a script from a guy who has never done anything?

    FOLEY: Well they just got a hold of me through my manager.  Jameel and Jay Khan a hold of my manager and my manager just really liked them.  He called me up and said there are these guys from Chicago and they don’t have a lot of money so it’s going to be very, very low budget.  But then he said they seem like really good people and it’s got a good script.  My manager is a decent guy and I trust his judgment about people so I called them up and they were nice guys.  They sent me the script and it was a really good script and I thought if he can write the script then he can direct it too.  Basically having one conversation with them and after reading the script, I said sure, sign me up.  I’ll be happy to do it.

    CS:  It’s amazing to me because you are willing to do things that just don’t seem ““ you’ve had major success with Kids in the Hall, you had major success with Newsradio and you are in the pantheon now of the Disney/Pixar heritage ““ is it hard not to fall into that trap of thinking there are some things you will not do?  You basically are open to possibilities.  Is that hard to do?

    FOLEY: No, not for me it doesn’t seem to be.  I don’t think too much in terms of career plan or terms of legacy or anything like that.  If something seems like it will be a fun thing to do and if the people seems like they are going to be interesting to be with, then that is more important to me than the actual product in a lot of ways.  If it seems like it’s going to be a nice experience, because I spend most of my time, for me the movie is about making it.  To see it doesn’t take a lot of time but making it ““ you are going to be with these people for a while and I want to spend it with people I like.  That’s the great part about being an actor.  You get to meet all these people and I like being on a set and if it’s going to be a fun set to be on then I’ll show up.

    CS:  That leads to the next question about the other actors around you.  I thought Federico did a fabulous job.  All these actors knew what they needed to do.

    FOLEY: Yes.  And they are all not just actors but really talented people.

    daveCS:  That’s what’s amazing that these guys, most of the people you were in with, do have long resumes.  They’ve done one shot here, one shot there but they’ve done a lot of productions but like you said, they are not household names but they are good at what they do.

    FOLEY: Yeah, and I think they all will become much better known.  Everyone but me in that is pretty young.  Screw them.

    CS:  Were you like the elder statesman on set?

    FOLEY: Oh yeah.  Oh yeah.  Not sure if it was the elder statesman or the old uncle that has fun with the kids.

    CS:  The one they’re not quite sure if he’s pervy or not.

    FOLEY: Yeah, “Come on I don’t care if you’re 17, have a beer..”

    (Laughs)

    CS:  How was that with the other actors?  Obviously, it was Jameel’s first film. Were you leaned on at all?  Did you help add anything suggestion-wise?

    FOLEY: They were very open.  It was a very relaxed set and Jameel really knew what he was doing.  He knew what he wanted and knew how he wanted to shoot the movie.  So, he didn’t need any help from me and he had already written a great script.  All I had to do was figure out how I wanted to play it and embellish it here and there, which is what you do when you are performing.  Jameel kept it open and shoot it in a way that we could so we could relax with each other and be very natural with the dialogue.  We could adlib ““ did a lot of cross masters and wide shots – three shots, two shots – which gave us a lot of room to play.  We were playing around within the scenes.  No one felt like we had to reinvent the scene.  We played it the way it was written.

    CS:  Did you find that things moved rather quickly?  I only ask because reading in passing that from start to finish it took Jameel about 4 years to get this all together and put out there for everyone to see.  I assume you were brought on late in that game?

    FOLEY: I was hired just a couple weeks before we started shooting.  Then we had a very short schedule and so, yea, we shot very quickly.  We didn’t have the luxury of shooting a lot of takes or shooting a lot of coverage so we shot as quickly as we could.  But, I’ve stayed friends with Jameel and Jay

  • Opinion In A Haystack: THE FOURTH KIND

    haystackheader.jpg

    fourthkindposter

    Elias Koteas would hate me. No matter how great an actor he is (and he is a great actor) or how accomplished he becomes, it is very hard not to imagine him with a hockey mask and a golf bag. He is like Frosted Mini-Wheats. The adult in me knows the guy has some of the most underrated acting chops ever; the kid in me watches films, such as The Fourth Kind, and screams “Pound their owl faces in with your cricket bat Casey Jones!”

    elias

    He is so much more then the role of Casey, that still doesn’t erase the fact that he was a childhood hero to some of us. The first truly great “bad ass” delivered to my generation via an excellent kid’s movie. My point is that actors carry the baggage of past roles with them sometimes. That is expected, and fine, but this is why most “normal” mainstream movies, especially horror, don’t scare as much as they could. We are familiar with these people. Their faces are a constant visual reminder that it’s all make believe. When the step dad from Liar Liar saws his foot off, while you might be in shock at the concept, you know deep down that the Dred Pirate Roberts has still got ten toes. The Fourth Kind confuses me: why go through all the motions of watering down supposedly real footage with the baggage of Hollywood actors? Why even go so far as to blatantly make that part of the marketing campaign?

    The Fourth Kind is going to be looked at as another “found footage” movie, especially in the recent wake of Paranormal Activity. However, two very big things separate it from the pack: the footage is supposedly real, and the footage was never lost. In short, this non-sequel-but-titled-confusingly-and-probably-deliberately-like-a-sequel to Spielberg’s Close Encounters of the Third Kind, is about a supposedly real psychologist, Dr. Abigail Tyler, who is investigating the strange occurrences of alien abductions in Nome, Alaska circa the year 2000. Milla Jovovich plays the title role of Dr. Tyler in the in-movie dramatization of the actual events. Elias Koteas and Will Patton act out the supposedly real events along side Jovovich, all of them doing an admirable job with what they have to work with. Now this is what makes this film so unique: it’s simultaneously shows us the real and the dramatized version of the doctor’s recorded sessions with the supposed alien abductees. The movie even goes so far as to often split the screen in half (or fourths!) and shows the real tape, versus the dramatization of the tape. In many ways it makes the same editing mistakes that Ang Lee’s Hulk did years ago. It is very unique, as I am not quite sure something like this has ever been done before, yet it is also very tiresome, confusing to the eyes, and like a giant exercise in futility. Why do we need Milla saying the same lines simultaneously with the real Abigail while they both are on screen? The answer is that we don’t. They fill in the gaps between the supposedly “actual footage” of the story with the Hollywood actors. One would assume that the gaps being filled in are from the mouth of the actual Abigail Tyler herself. So in conjunction with the “actual footage and audio” you are also getting dramatized accounts of what supposedly happened in between.

    Why water it all down? Sure if you want to release this in theaters as a “film” you have to give people more then a Discovery Channel UFO special”¦or do you? I’ll admit that Paranormal Activity made me lose an entire night of sleep, probably for the first time in a decade. This being ever more embarrassing because I was fully aware that it was completely fake. That is not a critique of the movie, I am just saying that it got to me, and horror movies never do. It has something to do with this low budget genre. Any time where no “Hollywood” is present, and no sign of the “evil” is shown on camera it screws with the mind. If Paranormal Activity had showed the demon, I wouldn’t have lost a wink of sleep, if we saw the Blair Witch I probably wouldn’t have flinched, regardless of the quality of the beast (sorry Rick Baker.) The irony being, the less visceral the villain is, the more visceral the scares are. This brings me to all my questions concerning The Fourth Kind. If you have “actual footage,” in many ways similar to the “fake found footage” of Paranormal Activity or Blair Witch, why take all the piss out of it and inject heaps and mounds of Hollywood into its core, wasting all the time and money in the process? Then they go so far as to show them side by side, as if to say “SEE, LOOK, THEY MATCH!!!” As an audience member are we suppose to be thinking “yes, they do match, are the accurate performances what I am suppose to be focusing on?” Who wouldn’t rather just watch the straight up, untouched videos of these regression psychology sessions? I would, and it would be leaps and bounds more terrifying.

    milla

    The backbone of the entire documentary/dramatization/film/docu-drama-film is a supposedly real interview with Dr. Tyler that happens long after the events in 2000. This interview footage, for me, was the scariest part of the experience. If all of this actually happened then this women has been completely put through the ringer, so I don’t want to outright insult something so trivial, but her face is disturbing. Really disturbing. In fact her facial features and shape are so “alien-esque” that I started to wonder if the twist of the whole Fourth Kind experience was going to be that it’s fake, then her face would start to distort CGI-style, then cut to credits. Her overall look and demeanor is what actually started to make me almost assuredly doubt the claims of the movie. She is perfectly emaciated and morbidly colored to the point where if they were making The Fourth Kind as a farce from the beginning they would have cast this woman and through makeup made her look exactly like she does. Also, while I can’t personally give any validity to its claims, this can be found in the trivia section of the film’s IMDB page:

    According to promotional materials from Universal, the film is framed around a psychologist named Abigail Tyler who interviewed traumatized patients in Nome, but Alaska state licensing examiner Jan Mays says she can’t find records of an Abigail Tyler ever being licensed in any profession in Alaska. Ron Adler, CEO and director of the Alaska Psychiatric Institute and Denise Dillard, president of the Alaska Psychological Association say they’ve never heard of Abigail Tyler.

    One very questionable aspect of this whole ordeal to consider is what the term “Actual Footage” implies. The subtitles make constant note of when “actual footage” or audio is being presented. Actual footage? All footage is actual footage isn’t it? The footage of Jaws popping out of the water, in Jaws, is actual footage. Sure, maybe this is “actual footage” of a psychologist’s regression therapy session in 2000, but that has really no bearing on the fact that the people in the video aren’t simply actors. Yes, it is a bit ridiculous of me to assume this movie, this possible farce, was 9 years in the making, but if they are pulling on our leg hard enough to say these abductions are real, why would they sweat over saying that footage shot with an old camcorder in 2008 happened in 2000? It should simply be given consideration, due to the ease at which language is often used to deceive. Yes, it could just be nitpicking, and common sense should dictate that the “actual footage” is simply film or video stock that wasn’t shot with the intent of story telling.

    ***SPOILERS START HERE***

    The “actual footage” itself is very creepy, however it felt produced. I obviously don’t know the truth, nor will I probably ever, but something about the video footage seemed perfectly imperfect. It’s hard to explain. When ever the patients start to recount what they think they saw, the video fills with distortion (supposedly caused by aliens.) However, there is just enough clarity in the distortion to tell what is happening, and what is happening seems very”¦cliché. We get loud, digitized, thundering voices, screams of terror, mouths opening extremely wide whilst howling, and a man levitating off a bed. While all of that is filled with the creeps, all of it is also very Hollywood. Also, perhaps it is just me, but it felt as though the mania happening beneath the distortion was digitally touched up. It is obviously very difficult to explain, some of the lighting in those shots just seemed manufactured, as often seen with special effects in the digital age. I am fully open to that not being the case.

    ***SPOILERS STOP HERE***

    If there was a final assessment to make about The Fourth Kind it would be of a missed opportunity. They ladled too much Hollywood gravy all over this delicious, if synthetic, steak and made it just taste like wet salt. However, it would be interesting to find out this story from the point of view of the abductors. There’s a great Kids In The Hall sketch that involves the boring lives of aliens who spend every day anal probing abductees. They complain about their unfulfilling jobs as would a dock worker, or an office temp. That KITH skit was in my head during the entire duration of The Fourth Kind. As the human’s are tortured and screaming with nightmares and getting abducted, are the aliens just doing their boring day jobs?

    kithanal

    Thanks for reading. Now go rent, buy, or watch a lot of Elias Koteas movies. He’s a great talent, you won’t regret it.

    Now it’s time for a chicken sandwich.

  • Trailer Park: End of Year Holiday Cornucopia

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    I’m awesome. I wrote a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

    Merry Christmas, Happy Kwanzaa, Delightful Hanukkah to you all…I’ve got tons to talk about today…

    I think years of doing my favorite trailers has become a little same ol’ same ol’. This time, however, for those keeping track of me as I’ve been doing this column now for almost 5(!) years now it looks like I need to shake it up a little bit. No one hates lists more than me, I rarely do them, so I figure I would just stick in some of the more memorable moments from this last year. From the good to the bad, I figured I would reflect on what 2008 has brought me. So, I’ve interspersed two film reviews, a check-in call from Ray Schillaci along with a DVD giveaway (among the other ones I’m runnin’) as I keep it loose and informal. Should anyone have anything to add as their own BEST/WORST for aught 8 feel free to leave it in the comments section below as I’m interested to hear about your own Best of 08.

    BEST FREE T-SHIRT GIVEN AWAY AT COMIC-CON: THE WATCHMEN

    This shirt made the wait to not only catch the panel that showed some of the best footage that we had seen to that point. Zach Snyder cut together a loose trailer that played more than a few times and, to be honest, it triggered the same response in the crowd as when he played the trailer for 300. To boot, the interviews I did on site right after the panel, even though they were not exclusive, made the trek from Arizona worthwhile. The ravenous scramble for this free piece of merch was not unlike the running of the bulls in Pamplona. Seriously, some of these kids need a Stairmaster or get on some kind of cardio program. I want to see future nerds in better shape than what I’ve been seeing at these conventions.

    Coming in a close second would absolutely have to be the TERMINATOR: SALVATION shirt that was given away after the Terminator panel which surprised even me; I wasn’t expecting much and was more than pleasantly surprised to see what G was up to with this property and, as a topper, a sweet ass shirt to wear to the gym.

    As an aside: Check out Rich Johnston’s WATCHMENSCH comic that is coming soon to your local comics retailer. Not even Alan Moore is above a little parody.

    BEST REASON TO HATE PUBLICISTS: The Kids in the Hall 2008 Tour

    One of the really nice things about writing for this site is that I basically dictate my own material. I lick my thumb, stick it up in the air of my own mind and then determine what way the wind is blowing. For those who know me, which isn’t many of you and I know that, I am a Kids in the Hall mark. I own all their damn DVDs, I drove 6 hours just to see a live show they did years ago, I bought a lot more merchandise than anyone whose name is Mark David Chapman shouldn’t and I have always maintained they really were an influential force in modern sketch comedy. Now, when it was announced they were doing a spring tour I was all about finding a way to talk to one, perhaps all if I was particularly lucky, of the KITH. I figured one PR rep would know the other and that it would be a smooth process. Who would’ve thought that the Kids in the Hall only had one publicist? I was thrilled when I eventually landed to the person who handles them and was actually enthused that I showed an interest in covering their tour. Their publicist wrote back quickly. I was amazed. They were interested. What did I have in mind, they asked. So, I make every possible concession I could in order to get these interviews. I was in rare form; I was giving away the Featured Interview space, I was willing to do these interviews at all hours of the day, I was whoring myself to every degree. All I wanted was some exclusive content and some time with the Kids.

    It worked.

    They wrote back, giving the site some non-exclusive (Hint #1) content and some ambiguous time about when to set all these interviews up (Clue #2). Like a sucker, I posted it. However, they wrote back letting me know how great it was that I posted some generic information linking back to a site that wasn’t ours and content that was branded as such.

    I am absolutely, totally, and completely in love with you. I just thought you should know that before we go any further 🙂

    Seriously, this is great – now we need to get you on the phone with the guys so that you can have some fresh meat for the site beast. Let me get them safely on the road, and then let’s talk about anything and everything you might want to do!

    Thanks again, Christopher – it’s truly a pleasure to work with you on this (I don’t get to say that often!)

    Well, what would you think? Yeah, that you were the f’ing man, I tell you that. And I think you would be right. Who wouldn’t believe that pile of steaming BS? Fast forward 3 weeks of teasing. I was so hungry for this that I thought it was in the bag. The only bag I was in, I take it, was some Nigerian 419 scam. Like a loser I kept going forward and the following e-mail came in when I could tell it wasn’t me she was hoping to hook up but, rather, the overlord of everything here at the site, Mr. Kevin Smith, that they was ultimately interested in. This is speculation but since I never was able to produce the man or even play with the thought of forwarding her half-assed invitation to anyone who I thought would even come close of pushing this up the ladder (the world became clear when I saw the line) I will never know for sure. Why I couldn’t see that this was the first move of the Bad PR person’s Heisman play against me I don’t know…

    Hey!

    I don’t care what you have to do – rent a horse, or a zeppelin, or a trolley car. Get yourself to one of the LA area shows. It will be WORTH the trip, I swear: the new show is fantabulous. The guys are having a blast – we just wrapped up four shows in NY and they’re headed to Texas next to tackle Houston and Dallas.

    Dave has written what is perhaps the most classic, textbook sketch I’ve ever seen him produce – it should be taught on college campuses because it’s that good, and round, and premise-perfect. Bruce has contributed a truly hilarious bit called “Grade 8 Dance” that audiences howl over.

    The Russo brothers directed a clip that’s featured in the show – it’s called “Carfuckers”, which probably gives away the premise a bit. It’s in the main viewer on Funny or Die today (a deal done with the company that produced the piece). Go check it out!

    Not sure how to accomplish this, but we’d love to invite Kevin to the LA show as well – I think we’re going to be hosting a reception afterwards, and it would be good to shake hands and that sort of thing. Can you tell me how I might reach him to invite him too?

    If you’d like to speak to any of the guys, let me know and I’ll arrange it. If you have a preference for one over any other, just tell me and I’ll take care of it on this end.

    Hope you’re doing great – but you shouldn’t be reading this email anymore. You should be on Orbitz right now, booking a flight to LA for May 9 🙂

    SIGNED,

    BAD PUBLICIST

    So, did you all see the interviews? Did any of them materialize? Check out my archives. Then, if you had the opportunity, check out my SEND box in my Yahoo account and tally up every unresponded to e-mail I tossed their way when I felt things were going south after I couldn’t magically produce her real quarry. Again, I realize I’m not from Rolling Stone, I know I don’t write for Slate but this is just another example of why I abhor all the sketchy, over-promising publicists who dangle the carrot and then see which of the litter they can get to bite at it. Invariably I end up being picked last but take a look at the archives this year; I’ll just find someone better to talk to.

    BEST GRAPHIC NOVEL: Too Cool to be Forgotten

    To talk too much about this graphic novel would take away from the funny and heart-breakingly sad moments in this traveling back in time story about one man who revisits his high school years as he tries to kick his smoking addiction and, instead, is given another chance at his formative years. It’s Alex Robinson’s compelling artwork and delicate care with which he handles his characters that make this an easy pick.

    BEST GRAPHIC TRAVELOGUE: Moresukine

    Imagine you are a stranger in a strange land. You don’t speak the language. You want to do as the Romans do but what if you don’t know what it is they really do? You ask the Internet, of course. Dirk Schwieger consulted the ranks of folks who visited his comic blog to offer up things, dares really, that explored Japanese culture and customs. From having Dirk figure out how to use a mechanized toilet to actually using a capsule hotel there are small pieces of real life that show us how the other half really lives. The reason it makes my list as best travelogue of the year is because it’s the kind of work that is absent in so many travel guides or personal narratives. This is one of the best ways to take a fly over of a country and peek into what you or I would be interested in knowing. The bigger question that you should find asking yourself after reading this fascinating book: What would foreigners be dared to do if they’ve never been to America?

    BEST REASON TO THINK THAT SETH ROGEN WAS NOT THE MOST INTERESTING FUNNY MAN OF 2008: Danny McBride

    Did anyone here see Tropic Thunder, Pineapple Express or even The Foot Fist Way? The latter I had to see right after I saw Tropic Thunder as I just savaged the trailer when I first saw it. I didn’t get it and the trailer was horrible in relaying the kind of comedy that Danny dabbles in. He’s irreverent in a way that’s not a soundbite and he’s genuine dead-pan delivery separates him from the rest of the herd.

    FAVORITE INTERVIEW: Danny Boyle

    This cat not only made a movie that would become the movie I took my wife on our 1st date but he was just the nicest and most gregarious person you would ever want to meet in a closed room. Too many times you get stuck in moments that become rote wherein you just want to get your questions answered and your piece posted. Danny wasn’t like that insofar that he had a real openness about him. His genial nature made for a relaxed atmosphere and he was happy as a clam to answer any question asked. It was a dream interview and for him to have been so accessible was reason enough for me to question any “artist” who thinks that in order to be great you have to be elusive.

    BEST REASON TO LOVE PUBLICISTS: Name Redacted

    I worked with a ton of excellent PR firms who helped land interview people from the likes of Henry Rollins (not up yet), Jesse Ventura (not up yet), Darren Aronofsky, Danny Boyle and tons of others through the year. These people don’t like being mentioned by name (but make sure you get their client’s name right!) but I make it a point to always send a thank you e-mail whenever possible to say how much I appreciate them getting me in to do my thing.

    These things don’t happen in a vacuum so it’s nice to recognize those who are merely standing in the way of you and the subject. I don’t know if they appreciate hearing it but it’s important to know there are a few who will go the extra mile to get you your story.

    BEST FILM: The Wrestler

    This film redefined what the word “resonate” means.

    It’s not enough to just talk about the performances on the screen from Mickey Rourke and Marisa Tomei. They’re captivating. What is really of note that explains why so many people have loved this movie is that it stays with you. The moments and words in this film are like oatmeal to your mental ribs; as such, it’s satisfying and you are not left wanting.

    A longer review will be coming but it’s enough to know that this film should be seen by anyone who wants a movie that stirrs you from the inside.

    BEST SURPRISE: Tropic Thunder

    I wasn’t sure what to make of this film when I saw the trailer. It was interesting and it seemed like a goofy comedy.

    And then I saw it.

    The satire, the raw viscera of seeing Steve Coogan’s head held up with Ben Stiller drinking its juices, listening to Robert Downey Jr.’s treatise on going retard, Danny McBride’s turn as a pyromaniac hell bent on visual spectacle and, as a capper, Tom Cruise playing a role that I will go on record as saying it was the best he’s ever done in my eyes (he made me laugh for the 1st time…intentionally).

    WORST INTERVIEW: Dicky Barrett from The Mighty Mighty Bosstones

    I don’t know if he just hated the way I talked or if he didn’t care for the simple questions I was asking but homeboy was not enthused to chat with me about his latest album. They all can’t be winners, I know, but looking back at how curt and matter-of-fact things went reinforced the idea that you just have to be ready for any situation that comes up and to make do with you’re given. Sometimes, that’s not much and this one still spooks me every time I have to do a phoner.

    BEST ADVERTISING CAMPAIGN: The Dark Knight

    Who else got wrapped up in the un-campaign that drew in followers from all over the U.S. of A as people looked for bowling balls, got cakes in the mail, went to campaign rallies for a candidate that didn’t exist and other on-line scavenger hunt that added up to one of the largest films that ever was? I sure did and I loved it. There’s something to be said about marketers that want to take things to the next level and this campaign did not disappoint. For every person who was annoyed by the ploys to get people more and more hyped for this film there is no denying that by the time the movie opened the core audience was ravenous to see what was going to be on the screen. Nolan didn’t disappoint but Bale’s voice came awfully close to ruining the whole mystique.

    BEST REASON TO LOOK FORWARD TO 2009: I’m not sure

    One of the things that make life on this side of the fence so much fun is that you never know what might come out of the year. I’ve had a lot of other small bits that are just too numerous to mention but, like I mentioned, since I am slowly growing tired of critics’ Top 10 list of the year I figured I would try and put this year into a different kind of perspective. At the end of all of this, though, is the appreciation for all of you. You allow me to knock on the virtual doors of publicists everywhere as I wonder whether I’ll be deemed good enough to be let in through their door. With every passing week and every passing interview I hope this process gets easier and easier.

    Now, let’s give away a movie…

    DEATH RACE

    This was a much maligned movie. Some people have problems with it but I don’t share that opinion. The movie was a real gas for what it was and I enjoyed all the incredibly unbelievable and impossible things that went on it. Jason Statham proves why he is the go-to man for these movies and for anyone else to say different has something against genre flicks. Since this is the holidays, I’ll make this really easy for you. E-mail me your name at Christopher_Stipp@Yahoo.com. I’ll choose at random some readers who haven’t already extorted free stuff from me in past few weeks.

    BONUS FEATURES ““ DVD AND BLU-RAYâ„¢ HI-DEF:

    • THEATRICAL AND UNRATED EXTENDED VERSIONS OF THE FILM
    • START YOUR ENGINES: MAKING A DEATH RACE: From pre and post-production to the casting of Jason Statham, this bonus documentary takes viewers on set to see how a huge, stunt-driven Hollywood movie was made.
    • BEHIND THE WHEEL: DISSECTING THE STUNTS: In this featurette, the many jaw-dropping stunts in the film are documented including interviews with the cast and crew.
    • FEATURE COMMENTARY WITH DIRECTOR PAUL W.S. ANDERSON and PRODUCER JEREMY BOLT (Unrated Version Only).

    SYNOPSIS: Terminal Island: The very near future. The world’s hunger for extreme sports and reality competitions has grown into reality TV bloodlust. Now, the most extreme racing competition has emerged and its contestants are murderous prisoners. Tricked-out cars, caged thugs and smoking-hot navigators combine to create a juggernaut series with bigger ratings than the Super Bowl. The rules of the Death Race are simple: Win five events, and you’re set free. Lose and you’re road kill splashed across the Internet. International action star Jason Statham leads the action-thriller’s cast as three-time speedway champion Jensen Ames, an ex-con framed for the murder of his wife. Forced to don the mask of the mythical driver Frankenstein, a Death Race crowd favorite who seems impossible to kill, Ames is given an easy choice by Terminal Island ‘s ruthless Warden Hennessey (Joan Allen): Suit up and drive or never see his little girl again. His face hidden by a hideous mask, he must win the insane three-day challenge in order to gain freedom. But to claim the prize, Ames must survive a gauntlet of the most vicious criminals – including nemesis Machine Gun Joe (Tyrese Gibson) – in the country’s toughest prison. Trained by his coach (Ian McShane) to drive a monster Mustang V8 Fastback outfitted with 2 mounted mini-guns, flamethrowers and napalm, an innocent man must destroy everything in his path to win the most twisted spectator sport on Earth.

    MARLEY & ME: A REVIEW
    I don’t read any newspaper writer whose musings deal with the mundane or observational, I depend on the comedians of the world to skewer day-to-day life in the way that the successful ones can, but I certainly don’t believe that a newspaper columnist’s sense of wonderment at the “ah, shucks” level of life warrants a cinematic envisioning.

    One of the issues I have with MARLEY & ME is its dependence on the dog as a metaphor for all the bad and good things that happen in the lives of Owen Wilson, portraying the milquetoast, middle-of-the-road Andy Rooney like pundit John Grogan. It isn’t that your average canine isn’t capable of imbuing your life with a little bit of humanitarianism, I know I grew up with those commercials that talked about how owning one could help geezers lower their blood pressure, but to have this as the basis for a full length movie where we’re bashed over the head with enough obviousness that this dog represents everything good and fair in this man’s life is a little hokey. I think the movie will play well with those who take stock in books written by Mitch Albom as the reasons why they love reading and why the Hallmark channel still churns out yarns that even Laura Ingalls Wilder would say are obnoxiously sentimental.

    But that’s fine, you see.

    This movie isn’t for me. It’s not even for those who I could engage in a debate about whether THE FOUNTAIN is pure genius (it is) or whether it was an exercise in artful indulgence. This movie is for people like my wife who love movies that want to make you feel all gooey inside, to hell with real conflict or dramatic infusions that would deepen the film’s original meaning. No, instead I get the story of how one irascible and temperamental mutt chews everything these people own as John pines to have the life of his fellow reporter (not columnist. The film will also take its time differentiating these two professions to the point that if you don’t get the difference by the end you have no business watching this) and best friend in human form, Eric Dane. In fact, I would posit that I wish we could have followed the life of Dane as he seems to be going off to Columbia, traveling all over the country, simply living the life of a newspaper Lothario as be beds scads of different women (the movie makes sure to point this out) while Owen Wilson is trapped writing dissertations on whatever people who read the newspaper to get their slice of life read about.

    It’s not so much the mundaneness that I mind, actually I mind it to the point that I wonder why there is a shockingly dangerous moment that is inserted right in the middle of the film, his neighbor is stabbed in her own driveway, if for no other reason than to move the plot as this chunk of actually interesting material is dealt with in such a flippant way I actually feel let down. What an opportunity to deal with the dark underbelly of life in any community where there come the moments when a columnist like John could talk about how this altered his sense of purpose.

    No, it’s just used to talk about how he gets the hell out of his neighborhood.

    I know like it seems I’m being hard on this film for how soft a sell this is going to be for all involved but there are some real wasted opportunities in this movie. As well, you have Jennifer Aniston turning in a performance that is alarmingly casual, someone forgot to tell her this wasn’t just a longer episode of Friends and I am serious when I say that either this woman can’t turn in an actual performance when needed or she’s mildly retarded for not understanding the ways life changes you when you go from no kids to 3 kids and being bitchy doesn’t count as a stretch for the end zone, and let’s also talk about Kathleen Turner. I apologize that I haven’t seen her in anything since WAR AND THE ROSES but I literally rocked backward when I saw Large Marge personified as a dog trainer and realized it was Turner. I’m not sure where she’s been or why she would take a truly thankless role but she turns in a performance that genuinely makes you want to take out your pocketbook to donate to whatever organization has been established to help her get back on her feet. A real reversal of fortunes and the reason why I bring this up is that it’s glaringly obvious to anyone who knows who Turner is. It’s distracting. However, there is a bright light in this film. Alan Arkin. The man can take a role as the editor in charge and turn it into something special. It’s hard to pin down why Arkin is the conduit through which all the life of this thing genuinely flowed through but he’s the real mentor of Grogan. While we don’t get a lot of time with him Arkin doles out the fatherly advice while being the calm voice in the cacophony of averageness.

    To say why the dog isn’t deserving of any real judgment by me in this review would to say that there was something special about the trained animal in this movie. The dog is a dog and in order to make sense of Owen Wilson’s hypothesis about why this dog represents the kind of humanity that warranted this film it is on the shoulders of all the other actors in this piece to make him relevant. Unfortunately, everyone is too busy chewing up their own scenery that the dog is an afterthought until it’s time for the movie’s penultimate moment. And the moment isn’t deserved. It’s rushed, it’s hokey and it doesn’t do anything to contextualize the almost 2 hours I spent trying to figure out the answer the question of why we’re watching a movie about a dog. Any answer wouldn’t be a good one as this film would belong better on ABC, interspersed with commercials for Purina Puppy Chow.

    VALKYRIE: A REVIEW

    The sooner you realize that Kenneth Branagh isn’t really in this movie the better you’ll be off in realizing what is at issue with this film.

    Branagh is billed second in the movie’s IMDB page and it made we wonder as I watched this movie about why that’s the case. I hope I’m not spoiling anything by saying that we only see him as he takes the first crack at killing Der Fuhrer in this film, a token appearance later and then once more in a moment where he’s all by himself at the end of the picture. I just couldn’t grasp why there was such a Houdini act with some of the players of this film but it’s really representative of why this movie only deserves to be a thriller when you look at the last half of the movie, the first half deserving to be lost in whatever editing bay it came out of.

    The problem with the first half is that we have a few issues that need hammering out. First of which is why Tom Cruise’s portrayal as Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg starts off with a rather compelling moment in his career, a real watershed that made him the linchpin of this whole attempt to kill Adolf Hitler (an attempt that would the last one and 9 months before he committed suicide before the allies had the chance to grab him), and I don’t know if it was brevity or the fact that they were running short on time but the man flips awfully fast. The way in which Cruise is approached and the manner in which he accepts not only the offer to kill Hitler, never once minding the fact that his family’s life, his children and his wife, would then be targets on the acceptance of this opportunity, but the swiftness from how he goes from conflicted military man to full on freedom fighter is alarming. It defies any sense of logic if you were to wonder what it would take to get you to kill your own president if you happened to have a beef with what your government represented.

    The second problem of the first half is its History channel treatment of the events that took place leading up to the assassination attempt. I was less shocked at the swiftness of Cruise’s acceptance to be a party to off Hitler than I was at the cold and detached nature in which we’re treated to everything that leads up to the film’s exciting second half. To wit, Cruise and his German buddies want to rewrite the failsafe plan, Valkyrie, which would go into effect should Hitler be pronounced dead. Long story short, and this is a really long explanation that goes to support the claim the 1st half is nothing but a long litany of factoids punctuated with moments of superficial sentimentality between Cruise and his wife/family, Cruise needs to get Adolf to sign off on the altered plans for Valkyrie as this is the first step in seizing control of the country after they kill him. The issue becomes that this tense moment should have been a true jewel of the film but it’s treated, honestly, like the re-enactment all the players involved were probably trying to avoid.

    Now, as much as Cruise has been maligned in the production of this film in the press I can tell you that it’s all unfounded. It’s not Cruise that is the problem here as he submits a solid, bombastic free turn as this ripped from the history book figure. He’s honestly one of the best parts of the movie. His quick flip not withstanding Cruise is a delight as the man who would try everything he could in order to defeat and kill the personification of evil. The second half is his, thankfully, and one of the things that adds to the movie’s distinctions as an honorable thriller in the true sense of the word is that it’s near bloodless. The entire last half hinges on how well the movie can propel itself forward without resorting to the usual violent trappings of other WWII film not to mention that they’re having to depend on actual events which were, themselves, bloodless to begin with.

    Thankfully the intrigue that follows as soon as the final plan is put into motion is indescribable. The events on the screen surely can be described, and they are as if we were following the 9/11 time line, but it is the nuances of Cruise as he plays von Stauffenberg, lurching ever closer to fulfilling what he went out to do and then how he deals with the aftermath. Cruise displays the kind of chameleon like qualities that warranted him a Golden Globe nomination in TROPIC THUNDER. The reason why that worked so well, and why actors like Robert Downey Jr. gained some attention, is that they gave themselves to the parts they were playing. Tom Cruise gave in to what von Stauffenberg was about in a way that not only felt genuine but impressed me with his taciturn delivery of the film’s key moments when it isn’t words that pay off, it’s the expressions that do.

    And I think this is why I’m so disappointed with the end result of what we have. You have Cruise leading the charge to make this movie so much more than just a re-creation, what this film mostly feels like, but everyone else on the periphery just feels like British (Branagh, Bill Nighy, Terence Stamp) and American (Tom Wilkinson dominating everyone else) actors just playing their parts. If you look at why a film like SAVING PRIVATE RYAN worked so well or why DOWNFALL starring Bruno Ganz was so affecting it really comes down to how well you cast your parts. In RYAN you had a clear verbal demarcation that Americans, well, were going to sound like Americans while the Germans, we all remember the one that gets away and comes back to haunt Hanks and Co., were going to sound like Germans. In DOWNFALL there wasn’t any of that clap-trap going on. It was a full-on German production that cut right to the core of bringing to life as to why this was a sinister regime that needed to die; I would dare any of you to find a better Hitler anywhere else on the screen who manages a 1/10th of the evil that Bruno Ganz brings to life.

    VALKYRIE doesn’t have any of that. We have countries of all kinds filling in for the Germans and while I guess that works fine for some people it’s a distraction to others. It was to me and it took away from what should have been a movie about the last throes of Adolf Hitler, the walls slowly and steadily closing in on the Nazi party while a pack of men seek to euthanize it sooner rather than later. Instead we have a movie that won’t make you too angry that you just spent $10 on a story that could have been delivered so much better if everyone else shared the passion Tom Cruise delivers throughout the entire production.

    And let’s finish out the year by letting Ray Schillaci get the last word…


    Don’t Judge a Movie by its Title

    When was the last time you sat in a movie theater and found that you discovered something special? A future talent that could get you excited again to go to the movies rather than wait to see it on DVD. Someone who you could look forward to screaming out, “Ya gotta see this person’s work!”

    I remember the debut of “Tattooed Love Boys” by the Pretenders or “Psycho Killer” by the Talking Heads and running out and telling all my friends that these people were going to leave a mark in the music industry. I was shunned in the beginning. They did not have the foresight. The same went with a little Canadian horror show entitled, “Shivers”. I raised my glass to its fledgling director, David Cronenberg. Once again, my friends abandoned me. But they thought I maybe on to something when I lead them to a little known street thriller called “Assault on Precinct 13″ directed by newbie John Carpenter. I was finally vindicated with the sneak preview of Carpenter’s next outing, “Halloween” which all of us jammed the theater time and time again.

    Later, I would find some really cool minor “B” classics that my friends looked forward to me recommending which included “The Hidden” and “Vice Squad”. The talent might not have moved onto greater things but there was no denying the raw power behind the creative force. This leads me to introducing a must-see movie (for all you horror/action/suspense fans) and director that I happened to catch at the International Horror and Sci-Fi Film Festival in Phoenix last month.

    The title is terribly misleading, and the director and writers have nothing to do with it. Unfortunately, it is the product of an unimaginative marketing department, which could hurt this fantastic fun film. The title alone had me dread going into the theater for the viewing, but its director, Ben Rock was such a nice sincere guy who had a genuine love and wonderful knowledge of the genre it peaked my interest enough to give it 10 minutes or so.

    Boy, what a surprise! Ben Rock’s “Alien Raiders” KICKS ASS!! This movie is everything we love about escaping into a dark movie theater ““ the adrenalin rush, the unnerving creepiness that almost makes you want to close your eyes, but you’re too excited to see what the director has up his sleeve next. I’m sorry if I’m raising expectations too high, but I went in expecting low-rent, unimaginative Roger Corman or worse Uwe Boll. This movie has it all, engaging characters, an eerie setting and a director at the helm that is ready to take you on a roller coaster ride you won’t soon forget. There are images that stay in your mind (empty supermarket aisles, a handwritten blood-stained window front, to name a few) and make you wonder, “What’s next?”

    If it was not for the lame title, we the audience would start off thinking this were a possible political/terrorist thriller. That soon changes after ten minutes and we get a hint of something out of a cool X-Files episode. I’ll be brief and stay to my m.o. of being spoiler free. A small band, of what appears to be, masked militants break into a sleepy little town’s supermarket and begin a hostage situation along with a couple of chilling killings. This is not by-the-book suspense. The scene is unnerving and is like watching Hitchcock for the first time. Don’t worry; Rock does not get carried away with himself with this wonderful piece of pulp. He tends to throw in quips and situations that elicit nervous laughs and make one enjoy the ride. Adding to the fun are not only a team of talented writers and crew, but a great cast lead by Carlos Bernard (of “24” fame) as well.

    Turns out, our militants are actually rogue scientists seeking out a very dangerous group of aliens disguised as human beings. I know, sounds bargain-basement, but Rock and crew elevate the tale much like “The Hidden” did, which became a sleeper at the box office and went on to spawn a sequel. Yes, the story has many elements that we will recognize from other films (The Mist, The Hidden, Carpenter’s The Thing, to name a few), but in many ways we end up appreciating it more than some of the bigger budgeted and CGI ridden spectacles that have trashed our theaters of late.

    At the Q&A a couple of people had some great suggestions for replacement titles, Raw Feed and Warner Brothers should take note (because you have huge potential with this Rock and his film). One tongue-in-cheek title proved to be fun and go along with the tone of the film, “Clean Up in Aisle 13″. But the one that won me over was a wonderful play on words “Aisle 51″. The entire setting is in a supermarket, much like “The Mist” but contains far more dread and proves to be much more satisfying.

    I urge all of you to email or write Raw Feed and Warner Brothers and push for a theatrical release, rather than the usual direct-to-video. This film deserves to be seen on the big screen having its audience scream and laugh with it. Hopefully a title change will ensue, a theatrical release date will be granted and I (along with many others) will see a sign of cinematic hope from a bottom-dollar industry that caters to bigger budget fare that lacks the creativeness that Ben Rock, cast & crew have displayed.

  • Comics & Comics: Middle-Aged Men In The Hall

    COMics & Comics 31208- lOGO

    Howdy Interwebbers. I’m Matt Cohen, and I now apparently dig The Kids in the Hall.

    I was too young to really appreciate what they were doing when the show first aired in the early nineties. I remember watching it, but also remember being extremely creeped out by most of the characters and sketches. It was just too much for a seven-year-old to handle. Over the ensuing years, I would occasionally catch reruns of the show on Comedy Central, and though I would laugh, I think a lot of that childhood “creepiness” still lingered in my mind. I still didn’t give it a fair chance. And yet, I was a huge fan of all the Kids individually, following their solo careers and really enjoying them.

    And then I just kind of forgot all about Kids in The Hall. I would see the DVD in stores but always pass it by with a quick glance. It just wasn’t on my radar.

    That all changed on Friday night. Long story short, I bought a ticket on a whim last week to attend the Kids in the Hall reunion tour stopover in Los Angeles. After work, I headed home, ate a quick burger (gotta love In-N-Out) and jumped in my car to head downtown to the famous Orpheum theater. This was my first trip to Downtown LA and thankfully my navigation system didn’t fail me. I parked in a lot (and was a dollar short… but the guy let me slide. Shout out to Julio.) and sat in my car for a few minutes. I looked around at the others attending the show. It looked more like an audience for a Phish concert then a sketch comedy show. Mostly folks in their late thirties, bearded (the men, ya mooks), plain looking, and reeking of marijuana. In fact, the parking lot looked like there was a fog machine behind every other car. This threw me for a loop. Keep in mind, I did no prior watching of the series before the show, so I really had no idea what to expect from both the actual comedy and the crowd.

    What had I gotten myself into?

    What bizarre and crazy sights was I about to witness?

    To put it simply – Bizarre and crazy sights… Freaking HILARIOUS ones.

    comicsandcomics51098kids

    I took my seat in what is a beautiful and overwhelmingly awesome Orpheum Theater. A still of Kids in the Hall comedy CDs illuminated the screen on stage. The audience quickly filled into their seats, and at 8:10 P.M on the dot, a clip rolled. If you folks haven’t already seen it online, here it is. As the boys run out of screen on the clip, and the all too familiar theme song plays, they ran onto the stage, Kevin McDonald in a pair of “tighty whities” with an apple placed firmly in mouth. The place went absolutely wild, myself included. Here I was, not fully a “fan” of the troupe, standing on my feet and cheering loudly for their return. The crowd’s energy was infectious. I actually WAS psyched for this show now. I realized that I did like these guys, a lot in fact. The compounded bits and pieces I had seen over the years must have subconsciously gelled into an affinity for the show and its players. The first sketch soon started and the night was off.

    I don’t want to go into each individual scene, because there were many, and frankly I don’t remember each one. The night kind of blurred into a haze of hysterics. In the following two hours, I saw characters old and new, some one’s I knew and liked, others, I forgot I knew and some flat out brand spanking new ones. The crew (as always, Dave Foley, Mark McKinney, Bruce McCulloch, Kevin McDonald and Scott Thompson) performed to the height of their ability, which in their cases is pretty damn high. Whether playing a normal average guy, or a sexed up Chicken Lady, the commitment of the performers never lacked – particularly Bruce McCulloch, who appeared to be having the time of his life on stage. Another interesting dynamic to the group is that there is no clear cut “leader”. In fact, I often found myself gauging the audience as to who their favorite kid was and, to tell the truth, each member got almost an equal amount of acclaim and applause (except for maybe Kevin, but that’s because he is everyone’s favorite awkward man-child and needs no further acclaim). Yes, some of the new sketches were a little bit lazy, but that is really not unique in the world of sketch comedy. Few troupes have been flawless (with the exception of perhaps Monty Python and Mr. Show, in my opinion) and the sketches that lacked had plenty of that Kids in the Hall brand irreverent and bizarre humor to keep the laughs flowing. Each member of the group also got a solo scene, which was nice, each differing vastly from their cohorts, my favorite being a narrative by Mark McKinney that caught me way off guard.

    The format of the show was also something pretty great. Each sketch was preceded with a still photo and a sample of a high-energy song to keep the momentum rolling. There was hardly any downtime between bits, which also helped to give the show a sharp and concise feel to it. At a running time of about two hours, I for one never felt bored for a moment, and was quite sad when the show ended. And confused”¦ Before the show there was really only one character I remembered from the TV run, The “I’m crushing your head” man. And yet, he was suspiciously absent during the show. That was, until the encore started. And it was well worth the wait. If the Kids are making a stopover anywhere near you, I definitely would suggest checking them out. I can promise you a night which like you’ve never experienced before.

    Well, tis all for now, happy campers. Till next morrow -and, as always,”Keep em’ bagged and boarded”

    Matt Cohen is currently crushing your head.