FRED Entertainment

June 30, 2010

Review: Walkabout

Filed under: Articles,Reviews — Tags: , , , — Aaron @ 5:07 pm

soapbox-header.png

Walkabout

lucyline.gif

walkabout-bdA common refrain mentioned in reviews of immaculately shot films states, “You could take a frame of this movie and hang it in an art gallery.” When you think about it, it’s a silly rave, as cinema comprises 24 photographs a second, and numerous photographs contain a painterly quality. Naturally, the films where this line can be most readily applied enjoy the contributions of cinematographers with the keenest sense of landscape and portrait photography. Ergo, the beauty of Walkabout should come as no surprise, given director/cinematographer Nicolas Roeg’s involvement; case in point, this is the man as responsible, if not more so, for the look of David Lean’s gorgeous epic Lawrence of Arabia whie serving as assistant director as the film’s actual cinematographer or Lean himself.

I say should, because not even a few glimpses of the film in online trailers could prepare me for the jaw-dropping, deeply atmospheric majesty of Roeg’s natural compositions. The story of two schoolchildren abandoned in the Australian Outback, Walkabout emphasizes the harshness of the climate and its alien appearance to sheltered, city-dwelling children by heightening the reddish hue of the soil until the endless desert comes to resemble the Martian landscape, a light science fiction touch echoed when the frequency of the two kids’ portable radio modulates in otherworldly tones over a shot of the Moon. Cleaned up for Criterion’s restoration, the tone poetry of Walkabout‘s alternately beautiful and terrifying landscapes and carefully edited close-ups make a case not for hanging some of its frames in a museum — and some shots, like those of an Aboriginal boy standing utterly immobile in front of a setting sun, could be in an instant — but to show the entire thing in as many art galleries as possible, achieving its full power in the manner in which it is meant to be exhibited. After all, who would ever cut up a painting just because one section of it was so good it could be placed in its own exhibit?

The children, named Peter and Mary in James Vance Marshall’s source novel but left nameless here, are first seen back in Sydney without a care in the world. They even swim in a pool located just off the bank of Port Jackson, as if choosing the chemical blue of their artificial bubble over Australia’s natural water supply mere feet away. Their father, a geologist, looks on with a strange look on his face, and we know something is wrong. The next day, he takes the kids for a picnic out in the bush, where he suddenly snaps and shoots at his children before torching his car and committing suicide. The girl (Jenny Agutter) protects her younger brother (Roeg’s son, Luc) from the truth, and the two move away from the vehicle, deeper into unforgiving terrain. After several days’ worth of stumbling around searching for oases, the two find a Aboriginal boy (David Gulpilil) on his walkabout. The young man does not speak English, and the white children do not know his language, but the three stick together, the Aborigine leading them through the Outback, seemingly just glad for the company.

walkabout1

From this simple setup comes a film that packs numerous meanings, many of them conflicting if not mutually exclusive, densely packing its trim 100 minutes — and this is the unedited version — with evocative editing, powerful imagery and minimal but devastating performances from all three young actors. The source novel is considered a children’s classic in Australia, but Roeg reworks the material into a looser and much darker realm. Where the children of the book find themselves in the Outback after surviving a plane crash, the suicide of their father in the film creates a more shocking foundation for the kids’ growth. Here, they need the Aborigine not simply for physical guidance back to their people but emotional and spiritual rehabilitation for their trauma.

Rather than shoot the Outback in flat, documentary-like framing, Roeg brings an improvisatory feel to his setting, filming whatever grabbed his fancy and editing together images of landscapes made vibrant and alive by heatwaves, broken up by shots of wildlife. Lizards skittering across the ground, bugs swarming over the carcasses of the creatures that did not survive the terrain, the tiny lifeforms that mingle with the humans and the larger mammals serve to make the Outback at once deathly tranquil and constantly teeming. Occasionally, Roeg and his team clearly saw something interesting and found themselves lacking the proper scope or film stock, but the resulting picture, distorted almost beyond recognition in heavy grain. Yet these shots are as gorgeous, in their way, as the crystalline extreme long shots and sudden, higher-quality zooms, and the various forms that the images take recast the Outback in a borderline surreal light. Indeed, the film that popped into my mind most often while watching Walkabout was The Night of the Hunter, another surreal fairy tale about children taking in a world much bigger and stranger than they can fully process while outrunning death (and another kid’s film that’s far too twisted for children).

As the two white children follow the lean, jovial black teen through the bush, Roeg gently brings to light the nascent sexuality of the older teens. Eyeline matches of the Aborigine checking out the girl’s sun-scorched, sore legs with more than just friendly care and the girl ogling his sweat-glistened muscles plant wisps of desire in the minds of those who have never truly felt it before. Fittingly, the setting of Walkabout serves almost as an ironic visualization of the terror of sexual awakening, a barren wasteland where parents not up for the job of explaining the most crucial, confusing and frightening stage of physical and emotional development in a person’s life abandon their kids to simply figure it out as best they can. When Agutter swims in a pond naked in the film’s most famous sequence, her playful splashes are not simply a means of cooling off in the harsh desert but of flirtatious display to the Aborigine. (Unbeknown to her, the girl’s brother sees her as well, perhaps setting off the first confused feelings that will root the eventual growth of hormones that currently ensnare the older children). Roeg further emphasizes the sexual nature of the film with cutaways to other groups of people in the Outback: a team of Western researchers looks for a downed weather balloon, or at least that was their assigned task. In reality, the men of the team ogle the lone female among them, trying so hard to peek down her lab coat that their heads practically sway with the wind-blown blouse. When the woman even adjusts in her seat, her nylons scratch against each other with hilariously deafening sound, causing the men to whip around and ignore everything else. Heck, even the music that the two city kids primarily receive on their radio is rock, the most blatantly sexual music around.

walkabout2

Yet Roeg introduces a larger, more complex and far more despairing theme of broken communication between people. The Aborigine and the white children can communicate basic ideas like “water” and “rest” through pantomime, but the two teenagers cannot confess their budding feelings for each other. Again, Roeg’s asides function as thematic support rather than simple tangents: some of the men in the research team speak Italian and do not seem to contribute much to the English-speaking scientists. The three children later pass a small village where a white Australian essentially forces Aborigine children into slave labor. The people likely cannot understand him, and his falsely avuncular attitude belies a disregard for the natives. When his mistress arrives, he heads in to his home to bed her, and his actions with the white woman are as perfunctory and walled-off as his taskmaster behavior with the natives he “employs.”

But Roeg does not simply suggest walls of communication between races or sexes. That is facile material for hack stand-up comedians. No, Roeg puts forward the dark notion that we are all locked into the parameters of our social programming. Rather than portray native society as noble and pure and European civilization as corrupt and arrogant, Roeg focuses on the traits all humans share, for better and worse. The Aboriginal boy spears an animal and clubs it to death, and before the audience can think to call his actions barbaric, the director intercuts shots of a white butcher back in the city casually chopping up meat with a cleaver. The Aborigine shows an amount of respect for his surroundings by eating what he kills, but he also engages in a fair amount of bloodsport, almost cheerily chasing around animals and killing them to prove his ability to dominate in the wild (and possibly impress his new companions). Only when white poachers blaze through in a jeep, casually firing on every animal in the vicinity and driving off as quickly as they arrived does the upbeat feeling of the boy’s spree suddenly feel cold.

The sexual tension between the older boy and girl, of course, is the biggest indication of the subtle ways in which we are all connected, yet Roeg still fashions a film about people who cannot break through barriers that separate them, barriers that have nothing to do with language, as shown by the girl figuring out the Aboriginal word for “water.” What separates them is their entire perception of the world, and because of that they can never be together. In the film’s best, most stunningly shot and most heartbreaking sequence, the Aborigine attempts to communicate his love for the girl in the only way he knows how: a mating dance. As the girl walks through an abandoned barn, Roeg pulls the camera back and up to show the boy following parallel from behind a wall, occasionally slipping past windows and door frames. Finally, he dons tribal paint and engages in an intricate but mysterious dance, so focused that the confused girl fearfully rejects him without realizing his intentions. The next morning, the boy has hanged himself from a nearby tree. The book kills the native through a flu virus that the inoculated Western children carry but do not catch. A surprisingly open display of anti-imperialist sentiment, this ending has a touch of didacticism that Roeg eschews. In his vision, the boy is driven to despair by the epiphany that he cannot reach and touch someone who’s standing right next to him. Perhaps that explains the father’s explosion at the beginning: a geologist sent into the Outback to study it, he found only a place so vast and unique that it broke his conception of the world and took his sanity in the process.

One should not hunt too desperately for a clear meaning, however. To assign a flat reading to so open a visual poem would be reductive and counterproductive to the movie’s atmospheric presentation. The combination of still landscapes and bustling shots of scuttling lifeforms allows Roeg to use the Outback as its own dimension, a place that isolates its travelers from the social ties that bind them before introducing a whole wave of creatures to force people into finding a more universal outlook; remember that Roeg often punctuates the action and emotion with a eerily perfect shot of nearby life matching what was just seen or felt. Unfortunately, humans lack the mental fortitude to survive such a reprogramming, so they either kill themselves or escape back to their previous lives.

Ergo, Roeg throws in a completely different perspective at the end that radically alters the perception of the film, that of nostalgia. The girl, grown up and married, has long since returned to Sydney and readjusted to “normal” life. But when her husband returns home and excitedly launches into boring details of his upcoming promotion in an uninteresting bureaucracy, she flashes back to her time in the wild, swimming naked with her brother and the boy.

walkabout3

This nostalgic remembrance obviously suggests that, for all the Outback’s danger and all the tragedy it foisted upon her, it remains a symbol of freedom and uninhibited growth for the girl. The use of ethereal recordings of children’s songs, both delicate and foreboding, throughout the kids’ adventure in the Outback underscores this: these reworked nursery rhymes look to the past past even as these kids are being pushed permanently away from those simpler days into adulthood. What becomes clear in this penultimate scene, however, is that even adulthood is a false promise: truly great films about maturation cannot play to adolescents, because you can’t understand what is to grow up until you’ve been through the ordeal yourself and figure out that adulthood is really no different than childhood. That’s why the boy, who realized that his future was his past, killed himself in hopeless depression, while the girl can withstand this epiphany because she only understands the dark truth in retrospect. In a world comprising areas that have either been Westernized or ruined by Westernized nations, the untamed Outback of Walkabout may be the last place on Earth that can force us to confront this, and that’s more terrifying than all the spiders, snakes and crocodiles that roam the area.

Walkabout was one of Criterion’s earliest DVD transfers, back in the pre-anamorphic days as the company was just moving out of laserdisc production. This restoration, however, disproves almost single-handedly the fallacious argument that Blu-Ray is meant only for modern films shot on high-definition video. There is such joy in watching the upgrade of a visual film, visual not in the sense of flash and sizzle but of a story told through the images. Walkabout, like Terrence Malick’s Days of Heaven or Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey, almost feels like a new film with a good scrubbing. The reds of the Outback soil are brought out to emphasize its alien atmosphere, the greens of oasis plants looking even more tantalizing and relieving when spotted among the dust. To finally have the film in widescreen only compounds the sumptuous pleasures of the images, now that we can finally appreciate the full expanse of Roeg’s compositions. Audio quality is not as key a sticking point, but Criterion brings out the atmospherics of the track nicely. The most notable improvement in the sound department is the clearer mixing of John Barry’s score, separating the strings from the brass and parsing out the diegetic sounds of animal noises so that nothing ever gets drowned out by another sound.

The extras are not as impressive as some other Criterion sets, but most of the features are newly included rather than a simple port-over from the old DVD. Interviews with Luc Roeg, now a film producer, and Jenny Agutter discuss the film’s legacy and some of the themes, while the old commentary track between Agutter and the director gets wonderfully in-depth about the shooting process and some of the meanings of the film. The best draw, however, is a 2002 documentary about the life of Gulpilil, who became the go-to symbol of Aboriginal life in the movies following his performance (see him in Crocodile Dundee and Australia). Gulpilil’s life is a colorful and turbulent journey that cannot be condensed into a single hour, but the documentary is terrific icing on the cake of this beautiful disc.

Jake Cole is a journalism undergraduate at Auburn University who routinely writes about film, television and music on his blog, Comments (0)

Cabin Fever 98: Man Talk

Filed under: Cabin Fever — Tags: , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 4:12 pm

cabinfeverheader.png

cabin.jpgOh no! Just when you thought it was safe to hang out at the FRED…

Cabin Fever (hosted by the twisted souls Brian Fitzpatrick and Aaron Poole) is the result of having too much time on your hands and access to your local community radio station.

Over the course of an hour, they manage to trawl the depths of good taste, plus throw some music in. How much more could you want from a podcast?… Quality? Oh… we didn’t think of that.

Enjoy! And we hope our cross Atlantic friends can understand the Irish accent 😉

Hugs and Kisses,
Aaron P. + Rev. Fitzy

linesm.gif

CABIN FEVER #98: Man Talk – There are men on this week’s podcast. Manly men. Talking about manly things. In fact, there is so much manliness I can’t finish this introduction for fear that I’d be talking too much… like a woman…

[CONTENT WARNING]: Explicit contents! We say every naughty word you can think of. You have been warned!

DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
Episode #98 (MP3 format)

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/cabinfever/cabin_fever_98.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

Got something to say? E-mail Aaron & Brian at the Cabin Fever mailbag.

line.gif

CLICK HERE FOR THE CABIN FEVER ARCHIVES

line.gif

##

FREDagator: 2010-06-30

Filed under: FREDagator — UncaScroogeMcD @ 1:48 pm

fredagator.png

lucyline.gif

It’s like visiting the 80’s action hero retirement home…

[ad#contestbox]

Soapbox: Adaptation

Filed under: Articles — Tags: , , , , , — Aaron @ 11:23 am

soapbox-header.png

The Tricky Question

lucyline.gif

Sorry for the lack of columns recently, but a bout of illness and a rush at work has meant that most other things have fallen by the wayside. But I am here once again, ready to tackle subjects relating to books and literature. And boy do I have a good one for my triumphant return: Is there such a thing as a GOOD book to film adaptation?

People tend to just accept that a book will always trump a film based on the book. The justification is that a film has to condense a lot of the content to fit it into a two hour movie and this in turn dilutes the story. Then you have people arguing that an actor/actress assigned to certain roles don’t marry together with the descriptions given in the book of that character. Or, and this is even worse, that the scriptwriters add in scenes that didn’t exist in the original text.

And online lists of good books turned into bad movies, or bad books turned into worse films or good films that made amazing films have been compiled and argued over for years.

I have to admit, I have complained about all of these in the past. As a book lover, I am precious about what I read. I devour it, spend days immersing myself in the world on the page before me, emote with the characters and have that same feeling of closure they do at the novel’s end. So when a book has been “destroyed” by Hollywood writers, I can get a bit uppity about it.

Currently I am reading Shutter Island by Dennis Lehane, which as the majority will know was released as a movie starring Leonardo DiCaprio and directed by Martin Scorsese earlier this year. Although I am enjoying the book, I saw the film first and will forever picture DiCaprio as Teddy Daniels, which is another of my Hollywood making books into movies bugbears.

Anyway, one thing I noticed when reading Shutter Island was how close to the text the movie’s writers had stuck. Paragraphs of dialogue had been carefully transferred over to the screenplay, scenes lovingly retained and the general tone of the story complemented. And this filled me with hope that there were some good adaptations out there.

The early Harry Potter books definitely fall into this category. Philosopher’s Stone and Chamber of Secrets were practically copied verbatim, with Prisoner of Azkaban moving slightly away from JK Rowling’s original offering. However, by Goblet of Fire, the size of the novels had increased substantially and this meant that the film’s writers had to cut out chunks of story, raising angry protests from fans claiming they had “taken out the best bits”. And by Order of the Phoenix the writers were including scenes not featured in the books.

Part of the problem that writers have in translating novels onto the screen is that there isn’t the same structure. Books include characters’ internal thoughts and feelings and often have a narrative voice running throughout. A film (on the whole) can’t do that, so there are often internal monologues which are chopped by editors.

Although hated by a lot of people, the first Twilight movie stayed loyal to the books. In the second movie, a lot was changed because in the books Edward Cullen disappears for about 400 pages and the screenplay writers were no doubt fearful about what a room full of Twi-hards would do when they discovered Robert Pattinson missing for about two hours of the movie. And this is another reason for changes to the story – a character minor in a series of books becomes popular, so the movies’ writers concoct new storylines that expand the role.

And although a comic and not a novel, Sin City was amazing in it’s dedication to stay true to the original artwork and dialogue. There were points in the film that I recognised as exact copies of panels from the comics, which really blew my mind. I can’t help but feel that it helps immensely if the director is a true fan of the work they are recreating on screen.

However, on the flipside of this is the horrendously bad reimagings. In particular I am thinking of Jurassic Park, where characters who die in the first book survive until the end of the third film. Park creator John Hammond is turned into a grandfatherly twinkly eyed old so-and-so, as opposed to the money-grabbing egotistical character of the books. Many scenes (particularly action scenes) were cut, and it dumbs down the paelentological jargon used in the book.

Other adaptations seem to take merely the name of the book and little in the way of story (yes, I am looking at you Fever Pitch). The Nick Hornby novel was about football in England and it spoke of the agony of being a fan of a sports team and watching your team lose. The Farrelly Brothers took it, added in that idiot Jimmy Fallon, turned football into baseball and removed any and all of the soul in the story. You never understood truly what being a fan meant to Fallon’s character.

So, as to whether movie adaptations of books can ever be very good, the answer is yes, but more often that not they won’t. There is too much compression of the story, distortion of characters and studio interference that will often sully even the most loving of projects by screenplay writers.

Katy Gordon

June 29, 2010

TV Or Not TV: 6/28 – 7/4

Filed under: TV Or Not TV — Tags: — admin @ 2:25 am

tvornottv-header.png

Welcome to another edition of TV or Not TV where I feel like summer is now actually here.

In general I have nothing against the Summer Solstice. It serves a purpose, it’s there for a reason, but it never really feels to me like the start of summer. Yes the temperature is warmer, the daylight sticks around longer, but it takes the American tradition and holiday of the 4th of July to really make me get in the mood. Family is together, the nation is on break, and there is the time honored tradition of TV marathon’s being put on because the network’s know that no one will really be watching.

Some network’s this 4th of July are getting creative and others just can’t get unstuck from their rut. SPIKE is once again rolling out the all STAR WARS marathon starting with PHANTOM MENACE and playing all the way through RETURN OF THE JEDI starting at 9 AM. I suppose I can’t blame them since they probably payed a pretty penny for the airing rights. It would still be nice, however, to see the network for “men” put on something other than the tragic train wreck that are the prequels before putting on what an entire generation knows as the true START WARS trilogy.

FX steps up to the marathon plate with a super hero themed bonanza. At 8 AM they roll out BATMAN BEGINS, followed by FANTASTIC FOUR, FANTASTIC FOUR: RISE OF THE SILVER SURFER, X-MEN: THE LAST STAND and SPIDER-MAN 3. It’s too bad that out of all of those movies the only one really worth watching is BATMAN BEGINS. They are rolling out a pretty nice theme but the implementation is lackluster at best.

BBC AMERICA kicks off an 8 hour STAR TREK: THE NEXT GENERATION marathon at 9:00 AM E/ 6:00 AM P (check your local listing to be sure). ST:TNG being on BBC AMERICA is one of those things that’s kind of confused me but 8 hours of Next Gen is definitely better than anything else mentioned. Be sure to check out the fifth of the eight hours as it features the omnipotent Q sending Picard and crew into a ROBIN HOOD adventure if for no other reason than seeing WORF as a Merry Man.

DISCOVERY CHANNEL is rolling out 15 straight hours of DEADLIEST CATCH starting at 11:00 AM.

At 2:00 PM TBS kicks into sophmoric hijinx overdrive with THE RINGER followed by SCHOOL OF ROCK, ANCHORMAN: THE LEGEND OF RON BURGANDY and STARSKY & HUTCH. This isn’t exactly an Oscar nominated line up but considering the greater population might be watching inebriated I can understand the programming logic.

Hands down my favorite marathon of the day, however, has to go to the ENCORE channel. An all JAWS marathon kicks off at 12:30 PM starting with the original and it’s three completely inadequate sequels. Of all the marathons this one makes the most sense to me if for no other reason than the exscuse to air the original JAWS. When JAWS came out it was the start of the big summer blockbuster release. It was the first film to have used the “wide release” concept, it was the first to use targeted TV ad campaigns, and it marked the beginning of the summer movie release tradition. Most importantly, however, JAWS took the concept of the summer beach vacation, turned it on its ear and made it something terrifying. Whether it’s suspense was made creatively, budgetarily, or because the damned mechanical shark wouldn’t work doesn’t really matter because the final film works. As a boy it made me afraid of the water and as a grown man it makes me want to tune in and watch a classic I haven’t watched in at least 20 years (and I still can’t believe there are things that I haven’t seen again in 20 years).

So there you have it folks, a gathering of television that is and isn’t worth watching if you decide to stay in for the big summer holiday. Let’s now take a look at everything else that leads up to it.

MONDAY

NBC – 8:00 PM: It’s the first round of the semifinals on LAST COMIC STANDING. I’ve actually chuckled in the first few hours of the show so I’ll be tuning in.

FOX – 9:00 PM: Tonight’s episode of THE GOOD GUYS features Dan being determined to solve a crime with the $3.52 he has in his pocket instead of using department resources. He must not be driving since that would hardly cover over a gallon of gas these days.

A&E – 9:00 PM: It’s an all new season of INTERVENTION and tonight features the touching story of a mother and son who both have drinking problems. It’s nice when kids still stay involved in their parent’s lives, isn’t it?

TUESDAY

ABC – 8:00 PM: World Cup Fever takes over WIPEOUT as people now have to face falling on and dodging the Big Soccer Balls. Here’s hoping they also have to endure the Vuvuzela Tunnel of Doom.

NBC – 8:00 PM: If you haven’t been watching LOSING IT WITH JILLIAN MICHAELS you might want to give it a go to see the positive effects she actually has on these people’s lives. You could also be like me and mock the clearly staged ending sequences that close each episode.

BRAVO – 10:00 PM: Tonight on KATHY GRIFFIN: MY LIFE ON THE D-LIST we see KATHY take on the snow covered majesty of ALASKA after booking a gig up there. If seeing KATHY with LEVI JOHNSTON isn’t enough how about the suspsense of her going up to SARAH PALIN‘s front door?

NBC – 10:00 PM: The results of Monday’s semi-finals are played out on an episode of LAST COMIC STANDING I almost wasn’t aware of. Great scheduling NBC!

FX – 10:00 PM: RESCUE ME returns! ‘Nuff said.

WEDNESDAY

ANIMAL PLANET – 7:00 PM: Speaking of marathons you may not want to watch the four hour mini-marathon of MONSTERS INSIDE ME. It may put you off of Sunday’s BBQ.

IFC – 8:00 PM: HEATHERS was more than just a movie to the people I went through my teens with, it was an obsession.

HBO – 8:00 PM: If you’ve been busy for the past three weekends and want to watch all three episodes so far of TRUE BLOOD‘s new season then tonight is your night.

NBC – 8:00 PM: Two more hours of AMERICA’S GOT TALENT? Does NBC have any other shows on right now? For three nights now it’s been the same crap over and over!

COMEDY CENTRAL – 9:00 PM: Miss the premiere of the new season of FUTURAMA? Set your DVR to get half-caught up tonight before tomorrow’s all new episodes.

THURSDAY

FOX – 8:00 PM: Tonight’s GLEE-peat is the episode marking the first guest-starring stint of Broadway darling KRISTIN CHENOWETH.

AMC – 8:00 PM: Get lost in a cinema period where men were men with three JOHN WAYNE classics back to back: HONDO, RIO BRAVO and THE WAR WAGON.

ABC – 8:00 PM: Get lost in the tranwreck of human dignity where men aren’t men in another episode this week of WIPEOUT.

COMEDY CENTRAL – 9:30 PM: Want to get caught up on the other half of the FUTURAMA premiere you missed last week? This one will lead you into the other two new episodes tonight at 10 and 10:30.

FRIDAY

USA – 6:00 AM: Turns out USA NETWORK is kicking off the marathon party right with 22 hours straight of ROYAL PAINS.

CNBC – 8:00 PM: The excess of the greed driven 80’s is personified in the incredible film WALL STREET. It almost makes me weep that a sequel is being made.

TBS – 9:00 PM: I’ve never seen the network television version of HAROLD & KUMAR GO TO WHITE CASTLE. I might have to see it tonight just to laugh… and how bad the edit probably is.

SATURDAY

BBC AMERICA – 8:00 PM: Part of me was angry that BBC AMERICA wasn’t airing a new episode of DOCTOR WHO tonight but the fact that they are airing THE TIME OF ANGELS and FLESH AND STONE back-to-back almost makes up for it.

HALLMARK – 8:00 PM: The title says it all folks: DOLLY CELEBRATES 25 YEARS OF DOLLYWOOD. It’s OK, a few other people are actually celebrating with her too.

SUNDAY

All that stuff up above wasn’t enough huh? OK….

PBS – 8:00 PM: Kick off your night of televised 4th relexation with the A CAPITOL FOURTH concert hosted by JIMMY SMITS.

NBC – 9:00 PM: Keep the holiday going with THE MACY’S 4th of JULY FIREWORKS SPECTACTULAR from New York.

CBS – 10:00 PM: Wrap it all up with THE BOSTON POPS FIREWORKS SPECTACULAR hosted by CRAIG FERGUSON.

FREDagator: 2010-06-29

Filed under: FREDagator — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:21 am

fredagator.png

lucyline.gif

I would like to shut down your brain for a bit… Can I do it with Conan: The Musical?…

[ad#contestbox]

June 28, 2010

FREDagator: 2010-06-28

Filed under: FREDagator — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:57 pm

fredagator.png

lucyline.gif

Here’s Doctor Who’s own Matt Smith joining Orbital onstage at Glastonbury. Remember – Tennant loves Coldplay…

[ad#contestbox]

BIG BROTHER Blog Report: Day 19

Filed under: Articles,TV News — Tags: , — Aaron @ 11:10 am

soapbox-header.png

Day 14

lucyline.gif

Govan got kicked out on Friday night with 72% of the vote. A real landslide and one I wasn’t expecting at all. This blindness to the hatred towards him may be due to the point that I don’t watch any of the peripheral shows.

I don’t watch Big Mouth and I don’t watch Little Brother. Partly because I like making my own mind up about the housemates so I don’t like hearing what a Hollyoaks actor thinks about them and partly because they keep giving out information of what will be on the next show. I know the idea of spoilers on a reality TV show is a strange one, but they manage to do it anyway.

It’s possible that if I had watched these sister shows to Big Brother I might have seen this coming but I’m still shocked that it wasn’t Dave or Ben going. Especially Dave after he aired his opinions that gay marriage is immoral. Maybe it was naive of me to think that this and his all round boringness was enough to oust him but either way I was wrong. The same with Ben, he has been pinned as the bad guy a few times in the week leading up to the eviction but it seems (and I’m glad) that the public managed to see through that. Shabby and Govan were on a mission to deflect anger towards Ben and it’s only fair that their efforts failed, and backfired in the case of Govan.

ben1

I was as shocked as you, Ben

It was hard not to feel some sympathy towards Govan though as he panicked about the outside world’s treatment of himself and his family now that it was pretty obvious that he is gay. It can be easy to forget that despite often thinking that the world is a more tolerant and understanding place that there is still a large amount of homophobia out in the world. Saying that, it was stupid of Govan to only realize this problem two weeks into being on Big Brother. You’d think he would have understood this months ago or at the very least gave it a thought. I guess it’s that kind of lack of forethought that got Govan evicted in the first place.

He constantly ratted people out and I guess that winds people up more than a schemer. It’s like prison rules. You can do anything except snitch!

Not much has happened since Govan’s eviction but I did feel sorry for Sunshine which is a miracle in itself. The food got taken away during the week due to Shabby’s constant meddling and discussion of nominations. But, on eviction day the housemates got given some pizzas. Considering Sunshine is a vegan they gave her two small vegan pizzas and a packet of crisps. You’d swear by the housemates’ reaction she was given a four course meal.

It was all pretty pathetic and spiraled down fast. The long and short of it was they moaned at her because she didn’t give her crisps to everyone else despite the fact that she shared her pizza with the housemates. I thought this was selfish on their parts and not Sunshine’s but I’ve been told by my girlfriend that I’m in the minority on that one. It seems I have found a soulmate in the food stakes. It’s mine and you can’t have it!

image-2-for-big-brother-the-best-pictures-from-the-house-today-28th-june-gallery-458251795

Bonkers

Aaron Poole
Follow Aaron on Twitter – @AaronFever

June 27, 2010

Hands Down #8

Filed under: Comic Strips,Hands Down — Tags: , , , , — Aaron @ 8:24 pm

handsdownheader.png

Welcome to Hands Down, FRED’s own look into the world of the folks that frequent this sordid world of geekery. Follow Aaron, Brian and Colin (and a menagerie on the way) as they traverse the light fantastic or some such nonsense… What? It’s an online fortnightly comic strip, what kind of description did you expect?

lucyline.gif

comic-81

VISIT THE HANDS DOWN ARCHIVES

Follow Hands Down on Twitter

Written by Aaron Poole. Art by John Merker. Copyright 2010.

June 25, 2010

FREDagator: 2010-06-25

Filed under: FREDagator — UncaScroogeMcD @ 6:09 pm

fredagator.png

lucyline.gif

Studio Ghibli is doing a video game and you can actually play w/in a Miyazaki world? Yes, please…

[ad#contestbox]

Musical MySpace Tour #10

Filed under: Musical Myspace Tour — Tags: , , , — Aaron @ 3:14 pm

myspacemusic.png

I’m back! For those wondering (all twelve of you) where this column had disappeared to, the answer is a sad and lonely one. I didn’t receive any friend requests!

It’s true, this column is dependent on bands spamming me and for two months… no one bothered. I was tempted to review some bands I was already friends with but that would have been cheating (and it would have resulted in one of these being 100% positive and I couldn’t do that to you). So I had to play the waiting game. And now, just like buses and a group of men in a porno, they’ve all come at once.

I actually got 8 requests in the space of two weeks so now I have to try and catch up with myself. It’s a mad, mad world.

Considering it’s been so long, I should probably remind everyone why this exists:
I decided to review every band/musician/DJ that tries to add me as a friend on MySpace in order to cast an ear on artists who want to be heard and make them take the responsibility for the (mostly crap) music I’m exposed to on a regular basis.

Sure, it got a little less regular recently but still…
————————————————————————
julietsrescueJULIET’S RESCUE
www.myspace.com/julietsrescue

It’s been a long time since I had a band to review so this was a nice one to start with. Juliet’s Rescue are a five piece from Kildare, Ireland. Now, admittedly they do that pet peeve of mine which is sing like they’re American. But, if you take one look at the lead singer you can tell, well, that’s just his thing. So just this once I’m not going to bitch about it and just take the music on it’s own merit.

Of the four songs presented I have to single out “A Decent Proposal” as the stand-out track. It’s all very listenable and “Make Yourself A Hero” would probably get in my head a lot more (as it has done) but “A Decent Proposal” is probably their most grown-up song. They’re a fun band and I think if I was a teenager I would turn into a groupie but it’s like finding Limp Bizkit when you’re in your 30s, some bands have to be found when you’re a teenager or you’ll never have that connection with them. Which is why I’m singling out “A Decent Proposal” because I think, if it played on the radio, I’d be interested.

I mentioned them being a band for younger folk and I don’t mean that in a bad way. We all know the deal. There is a demographic for certain music. And it’s kind of the problem with critiquing music in general, not all music is for you. Juliet’s Rescue are a good band. Solid music, decent lyrics, they’re solid. But, I’m not moved by them and I don’t think that’s a slight on the band. It’s just not for me.

Although, it doesn’t help when you could be the guitarist’s father. What is he? Twelve? For those wondering, he’s the guy second from the right. Look at him! Bless. One day, when he grows up, he’ll probably punch me in the face for this. But I figure I’ve got several years before this happens. In the mean time… coochie coochie coo!

Presentation = 4/5
Content = Great looking page but I would have liked more music, it also froze a lot on me
Music = 4/5
Friend Request = DENIED!

————————————————————————–
leeKOOPR
www.myspace.com/koopr

When I first took a look at Koopr’s page I saw the top hat, the band lineup of guitarist and drummer, and the “quirky” style. The term “cheap White Stripes” couldn’t be further from my brain, I assure you. But if I was a lesser man, a man of bitter mind, then maybe I would have said that. Or worse.

When I played “Selling Secrets For A Smile” my fears were not put at ease. It had the distinct familiarity of recent Jack White side projects. My poisoned pen was at the ready (not a euphemism I swear). Not that it’s a bad song, it’s good but it’s just too similar to other artists for me. It even reminded me a lot of past Musical MySpace Tour alumni MTM. You want your music to stand out and this didn’t do that.

However, things quickly mellow out and KOOPR save themselves. To go from “Selling Secrets For A Smile” to “Get It Right” you’d be forgiven for thinking you’re listening to two different bands. But the next two songs follow “Get It Right”s lead and you finally get an idea to what KOOPR really are.

There are still problems. In their little bio page they say that Bill Hicks’ “Relentless” is their favourite album. I’m not going to put down Bill Hicks’ but it’s not music and no matter how cool you think it is to be “different” they would have annoyed me less if they just didn’t mention it.

The lyrics are OK but to be honest I feel they drag the music down. Instrumentally I can’t really fault these guys much. Is it mean to say I wished he’d just shut up? Who am I kidding? This is the Musical MySpace tour. If I didn’t say something dickish I’d be fired.

In the end I guess the style is destroying my enjoyment of the substance. I think the page design is fancy but it doesn’t match their good songs like “dissolve”. It’s a false sense of identity and I can’t get with that.

Presentation = 4/5
Content = They could have done with a video, it might have helped
Music = 2/5
Friend Request = DENIED!

————————————————————————
gemmaGEMMA MEWSE
www.myspace.com/gemmamewse

Gemma Mewse is a woman of her time. Or is that location? It’s hard to tell. Following in the footsteps of other fantastic female singer/songwriters from Britain in the last five years or so Gemma is a woman of acerbic lyrics and musings rather than the power ballad, love song singing ladies of old. This is a good thing.

I was a little frustrated to see only one song is available in full on her playlist. However, she does give us a few videos of full songs so I guess it evens out. The song we have in full is called “Numpty”. It’s a sharp tongued hate letter that gets your foot tapping. It’s things like this that can get me behind Ms Mewse.

She also comes up with lyrics of some nice sharp wit. The song “Stranger Things” contains this little ditty that I quite appreciate “doesnt mean that its retro just cause it says so on the label”. Not much in the large scale of things, but it’s the little notches of personality that gets me excited by musicians. An opinion or a passion that isn’t just “hey lets all love each other” or “it’s a rockin’ world”.

Now, I’d be remiss not to mention that, as stated earlier, we have heard this sort of thing a lot recently. Kate Nash and company have been towing this line for a while now. Does Gemma Mewse stand out from this crowd? Unfortunately not. She would still be a support act rather than a headliner. But it’s early days and she’s a young woman with a good voice. She’s only 18 for crying out loud! With a good starting base like this she could go on to bigger things. Lets check in again next year.

Presentation = 2/5
Content = Lots of videos but the page needs a better layout
Music = 3/5
Friend Request = DENIED!

————————————————————————–
eddieEDDIEKITSNER
www.myspace.com/eddiekitsner

No, it’s not a typo. Eddie Harris is “eddiekitsner”. As far as DJ names go, it’s the worst I’ve ever come across. But is his music the worst I’ve come across?

It’s mostly horrible. I could go into the repetitive crap that’s on offer here but it’s just not worth it. Bad, home-made rubbish. I’d rather spend my time reviewing something people might enjoy so I’ll leave it at this.

On a side note: I’ve never understood the obsession DJs have with girls in bikinis. His profile picture is one and there are more with his logo painted on top throughout. Maybe it’s just the feminist in me but it rubs me up the wrong way. Nothing I can’t stand more than a chauvinist culture.

Presentation = 2/5
Content = Arse
Music = 1/5
Friend Request = DENIED!

————————————————————————
sherlock-omzSHERLOCK OMZ
www.myspace.com/sherlockomz

I love some good hip-hop in my Friend Request inbox. It always gives me something a little bit different to listen to than all the generic rock bands out there in the MySpace space. I love some of the UK hip-hop I’ve heard recently too as Dizzee Rascal and friends have been making some of the American stuff seem passé.

Sherlock Omz isn’t British hip-hop though, he’s faux gangster rap from the 90s. And that’s frustrating because if he took himself a little less seriously then this could be listenable. The guy has some decent rhymes mixed in with some god-awful ones. One line gave me a good chuckle though “I’m downing competition like pints in my local”. See, if he had more stuff like that I’d love it!

In the one song that he seems to relax with, called “Motion Spitures”, Omz finally finds a groove. Despite it being a two minute song with what only sounds like one verse it at least has the fun vibe that is severely lacking elsewhere. Also, yeah, you like weed. We get it. You can stop mentioning now.

I can’t recommend checking out his videos enough. For those who are fans of “Its So Cold In The D” there are treats that await you. I love music videos made with no money and these are… beyond description. Thank me later… Oh but try not to vomit from the terrible layout of the page.

Presentation = 1/5
Content = Loads here but whether it’s worth the eye explosion is another thing
Music = 2/5
Friend Request = DENIED!

————————————————————————

Aaron Poole
If you want to be in the firing line for one of Aaron’s reviews, send a friend request to www.myspace.com/aaronhbp and he will reload for next time.

Party Favors: Feeling Junger

Filed under: Joe Corey's Party Favors — UncaScroogeMcD @ 6:36 am

partyfavors1.jpg

jungerGLOUCESTER – The night Sebastian Junger arrived in town, it was a rather mild and cloudless day. There would be need to use the phrase “The Perfect Storm” to hype the writer’s talk and signing at Raleigh’s Quail Ridge Books. It was The Perfect Mild.

This appears to be a rarity in today’s journalism. Anything that happens now gets blamed on “A Perfect Storm” of calamities after Junger’s book about the doomed fishermen. Wall Street meltdown, BP well disaster and McRib are all given The Perfect Storm treatment. Sadly enough, he does not get a nickel every time it’s said on TV.

This appearance didn’t include tales of the people who put seafood on your table or George Clooney’s pranks. Junger spoke of the men who fight for America in Afghanistan. The Second Platoon, B Company, 2nd Battalion, 503rd Infantry Regiment of the 173rd Airborne Brigade Combat Team were stationed in the Korangal valley for about a year. Five times Junger embedded himself with them for month long visits to get a clear idea of the tour of duty. At first Junger thought this would turn into a sleepy story about troops watching a steep land covered in old cedar trees. He was wrong. The six mile zone received a fifth of the combat action in Afghanistan. The unit engaged in more than 500 fire fights. Junger captured their experiences in the book War and the documentary film Restrepo (shot with Tim Hetherington).

Sebastian Junger has the kinda name that ought to be attached to a Euro-creep trust fund brat seen on a Bravo series. But upon his arrival in the packed bookstore, it’s easy to see he isn’t a delicate flower. He’s a stocky guy who looks like he can handle himself in a fight at Norman Mailer’s wake. After goofing around in various jobs post college, he got serious about his career in journalism while recovering from a chainsaw accident. He headed to Bosnia for the life of a war correspondent. He made a stunning discovery about his fellow scribes. “All had been dumped by girlfriends before going.” He’s unsure if the romantic break up was the reason they left to witness battle or if the women called it off because they refused to stay safe at home and write about cat shows.

Junger began reporting from Afghanistan before 9/11. He interviewed resistance leader Ahmad Shah Massoud prior to his assassination by suicide bombers. He smelled the evil simmering on these early trips. He recalled the time a local pointed up at the mountains and said, “Something bad is going on up there.” Little did he know that nearly a decade later, America would still be dealing with bad things in the mountains.

The project began as a series of articles in Vanity Fair about what a combat unit experiences. It eventually evolved into the book and the video shot by him and Tim Hetherington was edited into a documentary that has won awards at Sundance and Durham’s Full Frame. The movie and book aren’t about why we fight so much as an investigation of how the men on the ground fight. He wanted to stay away from the politics and deal with the reality of life in a warzone.

He did get a little political at the start of his talk. When the USA entered Afghanistan to go after Al-Qaeda and the Taliban, over 90 percent of the country was happy. “We had the hearts and minds,” Junger said. “Tragically there was no follow through.” The Bush administration quickly turned their focus on Iraq without even capturing the face of evil. Only 15,000 troops remained to secure Afghanistan. Junger offered up the fact that New York City has close to 40,000 cops. “People were alarmed at the level of support. At one point it was an easy war. Now it isn’t.” Almost a decade later, the Taliban are still waging war and controlling areas of the country. The USA now has 68,000 troops in the country and Junger lived amongst three dozen of them.

Restrepo is the name of the outpost where the men fight. It was named after a medic in the unit that died early into the assignment. The men have a morbid sense of humor. They constantly remind a soldier with the last name Anderson that he’s doomed since the first two Andersons to serve with them were killed. They ask him what he wants on his tombstone. The guys ask, “Who is going to die today?” They lighten the mood by joking about screwing each others’ mothers when they get back. Since most of the men are in their early 20s, this isn’t a Golden Girls threat. They have made sacred pacts that if they die, the others are to erase the porn from their laptops before shipping their belongings back to their mothers.

During his time with the troops, Junger had a few close calls. He talked about standing by a barricade and having dirt kick into his face. He quickly realized a sniper had targeted him. He ducked down. Afterward he measured to see it was inches between the miss and his brain. However none of the troops cared to hear about near misses. He put it in the same class as telling New Yorkers about parking tickets. No scar, no story.

The question arises as to why so many of these men re-enlist and head back to the warzone. Why do they go back after the tour of duty is over? Why do they leave their wives stateside and return to the warzone? Many armchair pundits attributed it on the adrenaline rush of battle. Are they addicted to the danger of being in a sniper’s sight?

Junger observed they re-enlist as part of the bond between these men. “They don’t miss being shot at,” Junger said. “They miss trusting people with their life.”

“Brotherhood is absolute,” he declared. “You can hate the man, but the group is more important.” It’s not merely that these guys will die for each other, but they know that they will be slaughtered if they aren’t there for each other. He defined their action under fire with: “Courage is love. Your love for others in the unit makes you courageous.” They live in fear of what will happen when they take a vacation during the tour. Will the unit get overrun when they’re one man down?

Is there a single job in America where you real trust your co-workers with your life? Eleven deep well drillers learned that BP’s Tony Hayward didn’t have their backs. Think of your own office; do you really trust everyone in your office with protecting your life? Do you trust them to not eat your lunch in the fridge? Let’s face it, there’s backstabbing for the blue vest of the greeter at a Wal-Mart. In America, it’s every man for himself. In Afghanistan, it’s the unit that survives.

I asked about the way the internet and cellphones have changed war. The afternoon before Junger arrived in town, I was chatting online with a relative that’s serving in Afghanistan. The previous day his camp had come under rocket fire. That afternoon we’re swapping IMs about the genius of William Frawley. This wasn’t the same communications issues my folks had when dad fought in Vietnam and mom’s letters took weeks to get across the Pacific and into the jungle. How does this communication evolution affect the troops?

“It makes it harder and easier,” Junger responded. “You can talk to your wife everyday, but you are talking to your wife everyday.” At this point Junger feared he’d gotten in trouble with his own wife. After a bit of grave digging, he finally explained how IMs and cellphones are nice for those serving in positions far away from the action in support roles. They need the contact back home to break up the boredom. This isn’t always true for those on the front lines. After they’ve spent the afternoon exchanging fire with the Taliban, they might not want to hear that the cat pissed on the TV Guide back in Fort Bragg. The petty things in homelife are petty to these men.

He also mentioned that modern communications can really work against a soldier on the frontline about to leave on a mission. “Waiting on a cellphone call that isn’t coming is a nightmare,” How can they focus in Afghanistan when they’re distracted by what’s going on back home that has preoccupied the wife?

Turns out that you can e-mail some of the members of the unit in War by visiting http://www.sebastianjunger.com. He said if you have any questions about what the soldiers did in the book or movie, drop them a line. They might explain it. Even if you just want to say hello, write them a note. You can also find out where the movie is playing at the website.

HOT TITLE OF SUMMER

Is it possible to watch a show without getting a guest shot from either astronaut Buzz Aldrin or Golden Girl Betty White? How about a money shot from them? Why can’t Buzz Aldrin and Betty White make a porn? This the ultimate project for the duo. Why hasn’t Vivid Video offered a million bucks to each star in order to make Buzz Blasts Betty?

A SITUATION TIME 10 MILLION?

My poorly placed sources at MTV are hinting that the premiere episode of Jersey Shore will hit 10 million. Orange gold is what a certain honcho chants as his mantra. Remember when people appeared on MTV cause they accomplished something bigger than a bar fight with a PE teacher? Snooki will be the Jon and Kate of 2010. Which are the name of her infections. MTV is going to be sponsoring fist pumping viewing parties in major beach towns with the ability for fans to be spray painted orange just like the cast. Hide in your basement if you want to avoid an outbreak of Guido-mania.

FINALE FLUSHES

This TV season marked the end of so many shows. Most of them went out like bitches. Nip/Tuck‘s final season was a major whimper. Was Ryan Murphy to concerned with Glee to let the plastic surgery drama go out in a ball of fire? American Chopper was uncomfortable as that family of motorcycle makers turned into a nightmare. Has their been a bigger jerk on TV than Paul Sr? I just remembered Donald Trump. Still, replacing your “original” sons with your new wife’s kids is beyond tacky. Although it does suggest that Jon can have a series about casting 8 new youngsters to replace his kids. The saddest ending belonged to Lost. I’m not going to spoil the ending except to say that is just really made me feel like I’ve wasted an entire season watching it. How could they have done this to us? I haven’t been this disappointed since watching the Gene Simmons sex tape.

DAY THE MUSIC DIED

How can they get rid of the Free Credit Report Trio? They’re the biggest rock stars on the planet at this moment. The could headline 21st Century Woodstock and have a crowd of 200,000 singing everyone of their jingles. But it’s over. Their corporate overloads have decided to pull the plug and bring on some new guys. This is worse than The New Monkees. There only be one Free Credit Report Trio in my heart even if I have zero clue who they really were.

DVD SHELF

Gamera Vs. Barugon – Special Edition is the second appearance of the greatest fire breathing turtle that flew. This is also the most adult oriented of the Gamera series since there’s no kid in a baseball cap named Kenny to annoy us about how Gamera loves children. Turns out the plan to launch Gamera into space inside a rocket didn’t work out right. He’s busted out of his deep space cell thanks to a meteor. He heads back to Earth with a chip on his shell. Around the same time, three guys have arrived in New Guinea looking for a rumored opal mine. The natives aren’t happy at their visit, but they don’t care. They want to get rich. They find a massive opal inside a cave and split for Japan. They’re going to be set for life when the opal hits the market. However it turns out not to be a real opal. It’s the egg of the monster Barugon. It hatches to unless a creature that can freeze things by it’s touch and project a rainbow of destruction out of his back. It decides to freeze and blow up Osaka. The action is in full color this time as the turtle takes on the Beast from the rainbow gathering. Plenty of great smashing action when they tangle barely fits in the anamorphic scope scene. This is the Japanese version so the story makes better sense than the American cut that’s 10 minutes shorter. The folks at Shout! Factory dug up the original movie program as one of the bonus features. An audio commentary with August Ragone and Jason Varney gives the proper details about the series. Amazon has the next four Gamera titles coming out on two double feature DVDs on Sept. 21. Fans of Mystery Science Theater 3000 and WLVI’s Creature Double Feature will fear the turtle in 2010.

A Serious Man…..did my DVD skip from the middle of the films to end credits? What the hell didn’t happen at the end of this film?

My Three Sons: Season 2 Volume 2 brings us the most disturbing moment in classic sitcom history. Forget those fake fight club chats. Here is proof who would win a fight between Fred Mertz (I Love Lucy) and Mr. Drysdale (Beverly Hillbillies). During “Bub Gets a Job,” William Frawley gets a gig in clothing store. He ends up servicing a jerkish Raymond Bailey (Mr. Drysdale). Bub yanks off the guy’s toupee. It’s an amazing moment in TV history. Why isn’t this clip abused on Great TV Moments specials? The rest of the season keeps up the proof that Bub is the real father in the family. Fred MacMurray’s not that great of TV dad since he seems to need a major emergency to put down his pipe and paper to spend time with the kids. There is still music replacement on this installment, but they mix it down so it doesn’t stick out as bad.

MacGyver: The TV Movies frees up the bonus DVD from the Complete Series. Patty and Selma rejoice. These were two flicks shot a few years after McGuyver left the network schedule. MacGyver: Lost Treasure of Atlantis brings a grand adventure to the series. Brian Blessed and MacGyver (Richard Dean Anderson) hunt down the legendary sunken city. The cool thing is a cameo from a Pink Floyd record cover. MacGyver: Trail to Doomsday is the action rush. He shows up at a wedding and ends up saving the world from a nuclear bomb threat. These two films are much better than MacGruber.

Death Race 2000 is the ultimate edition of the ultimate drive-in movie. The futuristic vision combines the joy of NASCAR with the impending doom of Death Panels. In the future, Americans will be glued to the Death Race. Drivers zoom across America collecting points for speed and the number of people they kill. A group of rebels want to stop this government sanctioned mayhem. Can they really put the brakes on Frankenstein (David Carradine), Machine Gun Joe Viterbo (Sylvester Stallone) and Calamity Jane (Mary Woronov)? Director Paul Bartel oversaw a movie that packed way so much in 80 minutes. His genius couldn’t be duplicated as witnessed by that crapola Death Race that tanked recently. The new transfer brings out the dazzling joy of the various kills. There’s tons of extras that explore how this low budget gem came about. The late David Carradine discusses how he used this film to change his image from Kung Fu. Roger Corman and Mary Woronov contribute the audio commentary. There’s a Blu-ray version that will make you duck as Stallone drives toward the camera. It’s just not summer without a screening of Death Race 2000 for the kids. This is part of Shout! Factory’s Roger Corman Collection that’s giving plenty of his New World releases definitive DVD releases.

Have Gun – Will Travel: The Fourth Season, Volume Two gives us another 19 episode of Paladin’s hire adventures. “Long Way Home” puts him on the trail of outlaw Ivan Dixon (Hogan’s Heroes). “El Paso Stage” gives Buddy Ebsen a badge and a gun. He’s the marshal. Paladin has to shoot it out with the man that would become Barnaby Jones. “The Uneasy Grave” brings another Hogan’s Heroes regular to the Wild West. Werner Klemperer gets more serious than he ever did as Col. Klink. “Soledad Crossing” makes Ken Curtis (Gunsmoke‘s Festus) part of wicked twins. Richard Boone maintains his charm as a hired gun who’d rather not waste bullets on a gig.

Dragnet 1968: Season Two brings another 29 police cases that were taken from real life. Sergeant Joe Friday (Jack Webb) and Officer Bill Gannon (Harry Morgan) cruise around Los Angeles dishing out justice to punk kids, con men and LSD gurus. “The Gernade” has a creepy high school kid throw acid at Jan-Michael Vince (World’s Greatest Athlete). Things get worse when the loser hits a cool kid party with a live hand grenade. Friday needs to put a pin in the kid. “The Big Search” has Friday sniffing out lost sisters by checking abandoned fridges and local child molesters. “The Big Prophet” has Friday debate a Timothy Leary-esque guru that believes LSD should be given to kids. In the matter, it doesn’t matter who was right since the guru gets busted with his conviction revealed after the commercial break. “The Missing Realtor” finds time for Scatman Crothers (The Shining). Kent McCord plays a cop in several episodes. He’d eventual get a starring role in Jack Webb’s Adam-12. The transfers on the DVD look better than what’s being run on RTN. The big bonus feature is Dragnet: 1966, the TV movie that revived the franchise for color TV. While it seemed like there are hundreds of episodes, turns out there are only two more seasons to go.

The Game: The Third Season is no longer the final season. Reruns of the CW series are a hit on BET. So they’re going to revive the series about women behind football players. What really goes happens off the field and behind bedroom doors? There’s a fear that Robin Givens is gold digging a player. Is the woman who once married Mike Tyson really marrying for a cheap publicity stunt. Another woman might be pregnant although which player is the daddy? Rick Fox puts his acting skills learned at Oz to work. He gets used and abused by a gold digger. No longer is the cliffhanger in “The Wedding Episode” going to be unresolved. There’s 22 episodes spread over 3 DVDs.

Bitten Unrated is the uncensored version of the SyFy channel movies starring Jason Mewes. He’s actually playing a character with a real job. Mewes roams the city as a paramedic. He’s got a job that requires him to give drugs to people. He’s a bit of a loser with the ladies until he meets a girl (Erica Cox) that needs his medial attention. She doesn’t want to go hospital so he takes her home for intensive care. Turns out her real problem is that she’s a vampire and needs blood. Being a dutiful boyfriend, he helps her get victims. It’s interesting seeing Mewes playing a guy who has to be certified to keep his job. This was directed by Harvey Glazer (Kickin It Old School). The best film about a paramedic since Martin Scorsese’s Bringing Out the Dead. The unrated element does include a little extra flesh footage on the vampire. What really excited me was the preview for Phantom Racer starring Greg Evigan. The star of BJ and the Bear gets chased by a haunted stock car that eats people.

COMING ATTRACTIONS

Weekend Shopping Guide 6/25/10: Cat & Mouse

weekendshopping.png

The weekend’s here. You’ve just been paid, and it’s burning a hole in your pocket. What’s a pop culture geek to do? In hopes of steering you in the right direction to blow some of that hard-earned cash, it’s time for the FRED Weekend Shopping Guide – your spotlight on the things you didn’t even know you wanted…

(Please support FRED by using the links below to make any impulse purchases – it helps to keep us going…)

It’s been a few years since the wonderful Tom & Jerry collections were released, so it’s a pleasant surprise that there’s a new “greatest hits” set – Tom & Jerry: Deluxe Anniversary Collection (Warner Bros., Not Rated, DVD-$26.98 SRP) – which contains 30 shorts spanning their entire film career, plus a retrospective featurette. Now we can only hope that a complete Blu-Ray release is in the cards.

thinkgeek-01.jpg

Like most of the items they offer, you really don’t know you need a borescope until you get one, and then you wonder what you ever did without one. Thinkgeek’s literally named Handheld Video Inspection Camera ($99.99) is both useful and fun, with a 3ft length of flexible cord featuring a wide-view camera and led light, optional magnet and hook tools, and even the ability to do video out.

thinkgeek-02.jpg

Just in time for the M. Knight thing, the original Avatar Book 1 Collection (Paramount, Not Rated DVD-$55.98 SRP) is being re-released via a 6-disc, feature-laden box set that adds a brand-new bonus disc with retrospective featurettes and a preview of the Art Of Avatar: The Last Airbender book from Dark Horse Comics. For those unfamiliar with the show, it’s a layered, action-adventure-mysticism-based mythology that’s a beautifully designed, engaging series worth checking out, regardless of your age. The original bonus features include a behind-the-scenes featurette with the cast & crew, commentary on the pilot, and two making-of featurettes focusing on the sound and the Korean animation studios.

blankguide.gif

The Roger Corman “classics” continue to pour out in fully restored, better than they’ve ever looked form with the release of Death Race 2000 (Shout Factory, Rated R, DVD-$19.98 SRP), starring David Carradine & Sylvester Stallone as participants in a brutal 3-dat transcontinental race where points are gained by killing spectators and pedestrians. The disc is loaded with bonus materials, including featurettes, interviews, an audio commentary, interviews, and more.

blankguide.gif

The gimmick of Hung (HBO, Not Rated, DVD-$39.98 SRP) is that Thomas Jane is a down-on-his luck high school gym teacher and single father, who’s physical endowment opens up the door to a new life as a service technician for the local ladies. The 2-disc first season set contains a trio of audio commentaries, a pair of featurettes, and the character’s personal ads.

blankguide.gif

When it comes to high definition restorations of their classic library, few companies are doing work as magnificent to behold as Warners. Case in point is their new special edition of the Judy Garland/James Mason A Star Is Born (Warner Bros., Rated PG, Blu-Ray-$34.99 SRP), which looks and sounds stunning. As far as bonus materials, you get rare recordi9ng session music, alternate versions of musical numbers, deleted scenes, the Hollywood premiere telecast, a newsreel, the 1954 Studio Exhibitor reel, pot-premiere party footage, trailers, and more.

blankguide.gif

We’re now 6 seasons into Entourage (HBO, Not Rated, DVD-$39.98 SRP), and I still find it to be a smug, tedious, unwatchable collection of cameos and characters I really don’t want to spend time with. For those that do like it, the 3-disc set contains audio commentaries, featurettes, and a mock PSA directed by Matt Damon.

blankguide.gif

Christopher Plummer and Helen Mirren grab hold of the screen in The Last Station (Sony, Rated R, Blu-Ray-$34.95 SRP), starring as an elderly Leo Tolstoy and his wife, who becomes enraged after he plans to leave his immense royalties to the Russian people. There’s also a love story with James McAvoy, but it’s really Plummer and Mirren who you’ll watch. Bonus materials include audio commentaries, deleted scenes, outtakes, and more.

blankguide.gif

A creepy horror film about a magician, an accident, a murder, and an inheritance starring Cesar Romero, Dean Jones, and Connie Stevens? Sure, I’m there. The Warner Archive Collection pulls another overlooked catalogue title from the vaults with the remastered Two On A Guillotine (Warner Bros., Not Rated, DVD-$24.95).

blankguide.gif

If films like Psycho and Jaws proved anything, it was that horror that’s plausible is much more resonant in an audience. Though it’s got rough edges, Thirst (First Look Studios, Rated R, DVD-$24.98 SRP) certainly falls into that category, as it tells the tale of a pair of couples who find themselves stranded in the desert and exposed to the elements.

blankguide.gif

If Robert Pattinson ever wakes up and remembers he’s supposed to be acting in a film – and maybe choose his projects a bit better – he might actually be worth watching. Otherwise, he’ll keep doing yawners like Remember Me (Summit, Rated PG-13, Blu-Ray-$34.99 SRP) about an emotionally damaged college student who discovers something or another through love. Bonus materials include audio commentaries and a behind-the-scenes featurette.

blankguide.gif

So there you have it… my humble suggestions for what to watch, listen to, play with, or waste money on this coming weekend. See ya next week…

-Ken Plume

##

Contest Round-Up: 2010-06-25

contestheader.jpg

Welcome to our weekly round-up of featured giveaways here at FRED. Every week, we’ll present a new clutch of DVDs, books, and other cool stuff you can take a shot at winning. All you have to do is click on the graphics below to be taken to their respective contest pages. And good luck!

In conjunction with Warner Bros. Home Video, we’re giving away a copy of THE TOM & JERRY DELUXE ANNIVERSARY COLLECTION on DVD.

In conjunction with Warner Bros. Home Video, we’re giving away a copy of THE CLOSER: SEASON 5 on DVD.

In conjunction with MGM Home Video, we’re giving away a three (3) copies of HOT TUB TIME MACHINE on DVD.

In conjunction with BBC Home Video, we’re giving away a two (2) copies each of HOW THE EARTH CHANGED HISTORY on both Blu-Ray & DVD.

In conjunction with History Channel Home Video, we’re giving away two (2) copies of HOW THE EARTH WAS MADE: SEASON 2 on DVD.

In conjunction with Cartoon Network Home Video, we’re giving away three (3) copies of BEN 10 ALIEN FORCE: VOLUME 7 on DVD.

Win BEN 10 ALIEN FORCE: VOLUME 7 on DVD!

Filed under: Contests — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 3:04 am

contestheader.jpg

In conjunction with Cartoon Network Home Video, we’re giving away three (3) copies of BEN 10 ALIEN FORCE: VOLUME 7 on DVD.

Contest ends at 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, July 7th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of FRED Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

One entry per day, per person.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, July 7th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

Win HOW THE EARTH WAS MADE: SEASON 2 on DVD!

Filed under: Contests — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 2:56 am

contestheader.jpg

In conjunction with History Channel Home Video, we’re giving away two (2) copies of HOW THE EARTH WAS MADE: SEASON 2 on DVD.

Contest ends at 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, July 7th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of FRED Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

One entry per day, per person.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, July 7th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

Win HOW THE EARTH CHANGED HISTORY on Blu-Ray & DVD!

Filed under: Contests — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 2:46 am

contestheader.jpg

In conjunction with BBC Home Video, we’re giving away two (2) copies each of HOW THE EARTH CHANGED HISTORY on both Blu-Ray & DVD.

Contest ends at 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, July 7th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of FRED Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

One entry per day, per person.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, July 7th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

Win HOT TUB TIME MACHINE on DVD!

Filed under: Contests — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 2:22 am

contestheader.jpg

In conjunction with MGM Home Video, we’re giving away three (3) copies of HOT TUB TIME MACHINE on DVD.

Contest ends at 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, July 7th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of FRED Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

One entry per day, per person.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, July 7th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

Win THE CLOSER: SEASON 5 on DVD!

Filed under: Contests — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 2:13 am

contestheader.jpg

In conjunction with Warner Bros. Home Video, we’re giving away a copy of THE CLOSER: SEASON 5 on DVD.

Contest ends at 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, July 7th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of FRED Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

One entry per day, per person.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, July 7th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

Win THE TOM & JERRY DELUXE ANNIVERSARY COLLECTION on DVD!

Filed under: Contests — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 2:05 am

contestheader.jpg

In conjunction with Warner Bros. Home Video, we’re giving away a copy of THE TOM & JERRY DELUXE ANNIVERSARY COLLECTION on DVD.

Contest ends at 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, July 7th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of FRED Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

One entry per day, per person.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, July 7th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

June 24, 2010

Cabin Fever 97: World Cup Fever

Filed under: Cabin Fever — Tags: , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 11:31 pm

cabinfeverheader.png

cabin.jpgOh no! Just when you thought it was safe to hang out at the FRED…

Cabin Fever (hosted by the twisted souls Brian Fitzpatrick and Aaron Poole) is the result of having too much time on your hands and access to your local community radio station.

Over the course of an hour, they manage to trawl the depths of good taste, plus throw some music in. How much more could you want from a podcast?… Quality? Oh… we didn’t think of that.

Enjoy! And we hope our cross Atlantic friends can understand the Irish accent 😉

Hugs and Kisses,
Aaron P. + Rev. Fitzy

linesm.gif

CABIN FEVER #97: World Cup Fever – Everyone’s favourite cabin dwellers discuss the finer points of this summer’s South African football fiesta, from the vuvuzela phenomenon, to the controversy over the new ball. They also mull over the newest batch of housemates on Big Brother, which begins its final season.

[CONTENT WARNING]: Explicit contents! We say every naughty word you can think of. You have been warned!

DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
Episode #97 (MP3 format)

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/cabinfever/cabin_fever_97.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

Got something to say? E-mail Aaron & Brian at the Cabin Fever mailbag.

line.gif

CLICK HERE FOR THE CABIN FEVER ARCHIVES

line.gif

##

Trailer Park: CYRUS, THE MAID, BURMA VJ, and A BOY AND HIS DOG

Filed under: Trailer Park — Tags: , , , , , , — admin @ 11:26 pm

By Christopher Stipp

The Archives, Right Here

Check out my other column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

Cyrus: Instant Cult Classic – Ray Schillaci

cyrus-poster-480x717Run to the theaters before this gem is lost in the summer shuffle. “Cyrus” is the best comedy of the year. It may be the best comedy of this decade, because we have not seen anything like it since the outrageousness of such underground subversive classics as “Harold and Maude” and “Where’s Poppa?” Now mind you, I know those movies are not for every taste, but my lord what a breath of fresh air “Cyrus” is. Both uncomfortable and downright hilarious at the same time, “Cyrus” soars to the heights of cult classic with the combination of talents; its three stars John C Reilly, Jonah Hill, Marisa Tomei and writers/directors Mark and Jay Duplass.

The great thing about “Cyrus” is that it never quite goes over the top like some of the comedies of late. There are scenes that are awkward and make one uneasy, but we end up too busy laughing to dwell on it. As much of a Judd Apatow fan that I am, I find some of the gags, just that ““ gags. The grossness of the gag puts the brakes on the story and character. “Cyrus” is wonderfully underplayed and works beautifully. It takes a very bizarre situation and puts real people in it and allows the audience to enjoy it. In some ways, it has actually tapped into the strange attraction to reality TV in the way the whole subject matter is handled.

John C. Reilly plays John, a middle-age dysfunctional, anti-social loser who still lives with his ex-wife (in separate rooms), Jamie, played to perfection by Catherine Keener. Jamie is about to be remarried and attempts to get John out of his room and her house. She and her fiancé encourage John to join them at a party so he can mingle and maybe meet somebody. The result is John making an ass out of himself by being way too open and awkward. But one sweetheart, Molly played by Tomei, at the party actually finds some redeeming value in John and semi-invites him into her life.

Problem being; Molly has a secret ““ a very unusual relationship with her 21-year-old son (still living with her) that puts the kabash on anything that remotely appears to be an adult relationship. Enter Cyrus, Jonah Hill’s best performance ever. Hill is not used as a sight gag or somebody we wait to emit the laugh lines. This is a deep, 3 dimensional look into a seriously disturbed person that at times almost makes us feel that he could be capable of just about anything ““ including violence. Don’t misinterpret, Hill is funny but in a very dark sense. It’s an edgy representation that fuels the other performances and it’s what keeps us watching with baited breath. Cyrus is more dysfunctional than John, manipulating and totally into mindf*@#ing his opponents for his mother’s attention.

Everything that John goes through to keep the relationship and try to deal with Cyrus while growing as a mature adult himself is worth the price of admission. John C. Reilly has proved on several occasions how well he can convey the life of a loser. But in “Cyrus,” Mr. Reilly brings a genuine angst and a wonderful touch of someone truly fighting his inner child that so many men deal with. It is such a beautifully natural portrayal that it’s almost a crime to even think of it as a performance.

Then there is Marisa Tomei’s character that is caught in the middle. She’s not entirely blameless for the way Cyrus is. She is both frustrating and endearing trying to appease the mess that has been created. She wants to be a woman again and longs for an adult relationship while being afraid to let go of her over 200lb baby boy, funny and touching. I believe Ms. Tomei is one of the most under-appreciated talents in the business. She has a tendency to imbue her characters with an uncomfortable honesty while remaining sexy and fun at the same time and it works to perfection in this film.

What makes this movie so damn hysterical is how blatantly honest it is. The characters actually say things that you think you’d say but maybe it would be too hurtful. It isn’t, it’s necessary and political correctness is thrown out the window with glee. This is a wonderfully adult comedy that hearkens back to the golden days of Hal Ashby (Harold and Maude, Being There). Jay and Mark Duplass are to be commended for such a brave film during these overtly politically correct times. There is nothing more to say without giving away all the wonderful surprises except, “Cyrus” is priceless.

The Maid – DVD Review

the_maid_posterA movie that, on the surface, looks like it does not say much The Maid is a wonderfully deceptive movie about one woman’s life who seems so much a part of, yet detached from, one family’s journey. Somewhat taken for granted by the family that employs her, the maid Raquel (Catalina Saavedra) simply is a fondly thought of woman who helps act as the rudder for the lives she literally cleans up after.

While the movie shows this dour, and many times morose, woman navigate her life in relation to the family the film is a delicate portrait of someone who has so intertwined their being with the work they do that it becomes nearly impossible to separate the two. While everyone else is able to enjoy the pleasures of swimming or ping pong, as the children are wont to do on this movie, Raquel’s world is the home. There is no refuge. Her room feels and is shot, through the warm eye of Chilean director Sebastián Silva, like it is her own cell. A prison of her own making but, and this important, she equally finds comfort in her role however diminutive it is in relation to everyone else in the family.

The real treat in this film is seeing how Raquel reacts when the family decides to employ another maid to help out around the home. In almost slapstick fashion Silva creates an environment of bizarre and hilarious moments that juxtapose well with Raquel’s sour disposition at the mere thought or implication that she is being replaced after so many years with the family. She isn’t and she’s not but it’s the idea of it that sends Raquel into a mental tailspin where she is leading maids out the front door so she can lock them out or sending another so much into a torturous rage that the viewed interloper scales the family home just to make it to the backyard, though the back door, and upstairs in order to give Raquel a proper thrashing. Others meet the same passive aggression but it’s not until we meet yet another maid, Lucy (Mariana Loyola), where things turn and the film becomes something so much more than just the defrosting of a frigid woman.

It’s equally sad and funny but I would assert that it’s Silva who wants it that way. It would be too easy to have a movie where you have a character like Raquel represent class struggle and all the metaphors you want to heap on top of her but that would be doing the movie an injustice. You certainly can see that in this film but the movie becomes much more enjoyable when you consider the nuances of personality that Saavedra is able to channel through her face. So forlorn yet still capable of so much humanity the movie undermines your expectations and delivers a movie that is rich in character, spirit, and the strength inherent in the belief that work should not define who we are, we should define it for ourselves.

About the film:

After 23 years working as a devoted maid in an upper class Chilean household, embittered and ailing Raquel (Sundance Film Festival and Gotham Award winner Catalina Saavedra) can no longer care for the family alone. Trapped by guilt, matriarch Pilar (Claudia Celedón) refuses to let Raquel go, even though it is clear their longtime maid is slowly unraveling. Instead, Pilar hires more help, throwing Raquel into a jealous frenzy. The seemingly happy home soon becomes the stage for Raquel’s dirty tricks as she attempts to drive away anyone who threatens to take her place with darkly comedic, and in the end, endearing results.

DVD Features

Behind the scenes video clips with the cast and crew

From Sketch to Screen ““ a video comparison of storyboards to scenes

Photos from Sebastián Silva

BURMA VJ – DVD Review

burmaForget about the easy lines of “The revolution will be televised” when seeing a movie about the tyrannical rule exerted by the forces of the Burmese military junta that suppress any public declaration questioning their authority. You think marching around your town with a picket sign is the work of brave people? Try doing it in that country.

Burma VJ, shot with handheld devices, small digital cameras, objects that have gloriously allowed people to inconspicuously shoot video, stands as a document for those who want to see what true oppression can do to a populace. What you initially notice about those who would try and demonstrate is that, at first, no one really notices or cares to. One moment they’re out telling people about the grave injustices done to them by their government and all seems well. But it’s not until you see the plain clothes, government stooges round any dissenter up with the kind of speed and inconspicuousness of a shoplifter, that you start to see this is the stuff of bogeymen. Watching what could be an ordinary person on the street literally pull you through the street, throw you on the back of a truck, swallow you in the congested traffic of the city, possibly never to be heard from again, it’s then when you realize how frightening it must be for these people on a daily basis to simply exist.

The film chronicles many stories just like this, narrated by a man simply known as Joshua, whose true identity is kept secret due to his involvement with the pro-democracy movement, and exposes the supposed government as a ruling force that not wants to stay in power but will do anything to stay there. From the aforementioned kidnappings, let’s call them what they are, to soldiers who open fire on a gathering of many, Burma VJ is a collection of clips and recordings that show you the true cruelty of oppression.

The movie, directed by award-winning Anders Østergaard, is not only a story of how one regime can keep a population down but yet it’s also conscious of how technology can televise a revolution. While it seems that the proliferation of modern accouterments of daily life would help make a world aware of the cruel and inhumane things done to citizens of Burma the reason why this film even exists is because people are unaware, or are ignoring, the plight of so many. While some moments are blurry, intelligible, or confusing there is nonetheless a certain kind of outrage that steadily builds as you watch this documentary. It’s a documentary that shows you the power of the 21st century that can, for the first time, tell this story in living color but it’s also a testament to how far some regimes will go to keep people from standing up, from speaking out. It’s truly inspiring in a way that doesn’t seem forced or manipulated as the whole point of the movie is to tell this story from those who were there, who are still there, living in fear of a government that could make them disappear should it find out who these individuals are.

It’s something that’s frightening and comforting at the same time, knowing that the fight still rages on certainly inspires but knowing this document now exists for others to witness is a small victory for those looking for change.

About the film:

Anders Østergaard’s award-winning documentary shows a rare inside look into the 2007 uprising in Myanmar through the cameras of the independent journalist group, Democratic Voice of Burma.

While 100,000 people (including 1,000s of Buddhist monks) took to the streets to protest the country’s repressive regime that has held them hostage for over 40 years, foreign news crews were banned to enter and the Internet was shut down. The Democratic Voice of Burma, a collective of 30 anonymous and underground video journalists (VJs) recorded these historic and dramatic events on handycams and smuggled the footage out of the country, where it was broadcast worldwide via satellite. Risking torture and life imprisonment, the VJs vividly document the brutal clashes with the military and undercover police ““ even after they themselves become targets of the authorities.

DVD Features

Audio commentary with BURMA VJ director Anders Østergaard and film critic John Anderson

FIGHTING FOR FREEDOM ““ a video interview with BURMA VJ “Joshua”

Burmese Monks’ stories from the uprisings televised on Democratic Voice of Burma

A video message from Richard Gere

CROSSING MIDNIGHT ““ a riveting film about refugees on the Thai/Burma border

Worth Reviving: A Boy and His Dog – Ray Schillaci

boy_and_his_dog_ver2It’s been far too long since I’ve treated all of you to a dip into the revival pool. So I had to dig down deep to exonerate myself with something so fun, titillating (love that word ““ it brings out the eight-year-old boy in me) and downright obscure that perhaps you will find this piece worthy enough to continue on with. In today’s words “A Boy and his Dog” is the shits!

Even by today’s standards it is still subversive. At first glance, it could be passed on as just another post-apocalyptic tale. But wait, it’s taken from a story by Harlan Ellison and known as the inspiration to the “Mad Max/Road Warrior” movies. Aside from that how would one bark balk at an allegory involving man having a telepathic communication with his best friend (his dog) and hunting down meals for him as the dog reciprocates by hunting for women (not for a meaningful relationship). The best part ““ this is done long before the overuse of computer generated talking animals. So we forego the cutesy animated lips that Disney and so many others perpetrate on the animal kingdom.

This also stars a very young, pre-Miami Vice, Don Johnson, playing a none-too-bright, wide eyed horn dog. Johnson, along with the rest of the cast (including Jason Robards and a very funny Tim McIntire as the voice of the dog) is spot on with this apocalyptic satire. Johnson is Vic, a ragtag dimwitted loner, who is consistently losing a battle of wits with his telepathic pooch, Blood. One can easily tell the influence this film has had on films from “Mad Max” to “Book of Eli”. That wonderful desolate world-has-gone-to-shit look, trash and all perpetrates through a good part of the film. Those who are not savage are ravaged.

Avoiding other marauders, hunting down food and women, poorly, Vic stumbles upon the yummy Quilla June Holmes, played by Susanne Benton (see Playboy cover May 1970). She’s not like the other women who have suffered through the apocalypse. Ms. Benton, back then, was what young men’s wet dreams were made of. Quilla is a heartthrob mystery woman who leads Vic to a secret underground society that appears right out of Stepfordville. Interesting side note; both “A Boy and his Dog” and the original “Stepford Wives” were released in 1975. But the former was written earlier in 1969. The funny thing is, just when you think you have this film pegged, it takes a wild darker tone once Vic enters the underground hometown. Don’t want to give too much away since there are several double-take moments that have you want to hit the pause button and say to yourself, “You’ve got to be kidding me!”

Although an independent cheapie at the time, “A Boy and his Dog” is a biting masterful piece of work capturing the true essence of Harlan Ellison. Direction is tight and creative, and the cinematography is perfect, capturing both the post apocalyptic world and the underground society with a hint of “Twilight Zone.” Acting is wonderful with Jason Robards giving a fantastic low-key performance. But what it really comes down to is not the chemistry between luscious Susanne Benton and Don Johnson, which is fine, but the near comic timing between Johnson and the dog. It’s wonderfully and refreshingly adult with a hint of bringing out the juvenile in the male species.

This is not a date movie! Do not make that mistake. The ending will have guys roar and women cringe. It’s misogynistic and hilarious, and it’s meant to be to the fullest degree. This film was done during a time when people were not so uptight and politically correct. It’s also hard to see how it could be remade in our time. But somebody has the asinine notion to attempt such a defeat. I just heard that David Lee Miller (My Suicide) is now attached and making an animated film out of this. If you ask me (for what it’s worth) this is as wrong-minded as Joel Silver’s decision to remake Don Quixote with the fantasies being real. That negates Cervantes’ whole work. Of course, what does a literary genius like Silver care if there may be a few million bucks in it and a toy franchise? Either way, rent or buy “A Boy and his Dog” and be the judge. This film should not be remade; it’s as classic to the underground, cult movement of the seventies as Wizard of Oz is an endearing classic of its time.

Trailer Park: Reed Cowan of 8: THE MORMON PROPOSITION

Filed under: Interviews,Trailer Park — Tags: , , , — admin @ 11:19 pm

By Christopher Stipp

The Archives, Right Here

Check out my other column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

Reed Cowan, Director of 8: The Mormon Proposition – Interview

fullsize8A movie like this is vitally important to the dialogue process.

There are certain things in this world where there is a definite understanding that it simply cannot last. When it came to discrimination at the turn of the last century it was fine to turn away people based on which country they came from, at the mid-century mark we thought there was nothing wrong with separating people based on the color of their skin, and even now there are people who think that discriminating against individuals based on their sexual orientation is OK. The fact that the two former facts are now seen a egregiously backward and a blemish on the face of the humanity we seem to embrace here in America is appalling when you consider that it’s still en vogue to base legislation and opposition to a normal, tax-paying segment of the population who want nothing more than to be joined in matrimony.

It’s equally appalling to think that some in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Mormons for those needing a shorthand, would mount a political attack to overturn California’s already sanctioned same-sex, constitutional right, to marry. Again, it was already a state supreme court decision and this one proposition changed everything.

Documentary filmmaker Reed Cowan, a former Mormon raised in the faith, looked deep into this issue and came out with a film that is at once informative and infuriating. Not enough people were out there to care last November, as the tumult this threatened to cause thousands didn’t stop this from passing but this film should serve as the first step in showing people that these gay men, gay women, are people, are human beings. We will look back at these kinds of egregious political acts as the behavior of cowards but it still remains to be seen how many more years we will have to wait until we accept everyone as equal. Until then, films like this need to be made in order to show that stupidity is still alive and well in this country.

8: The Mormon Proposition is now playing. Check the official site to see if it’s appearing near you.

CHRISTOPHER STIPP: Please let me get right down to the film itself. I was really interested, at least reading about the movie that this movie started out as sort of a documentary on the homeless gay teen issue in Utah and that this issue took on a life of its own. What was the flash point for you to say, “You know what? I think I’m making the wrong movie.”

club-jam-hosts-reed-cowan-and-the-mormon-proposition-posterCOWAN: I think it was the combination of “What’s the real problem here” and the real problem is bigotry spoken over the pulpit, right?

CS: Right.

COWAN: And so we felt that really made sense and so while we were in the production of the homeless angle we became consumed with Proposition 8. So we felt sort of like an historic imperative to back-off and reassess and put our cameras where they needed to be and that was Proposition 8 and that was a wild ride. Because the discovery that happened after that was so shocking to me. So shocking.

CS: And I think the movie’s main thrust, and certainly one of the things that comes up, is that it is a movie about trying to create dialogue than it is about trying to point a finger. Looking back at the experience of making the film do you think that true dialogue can still happen with the church?

COWAN: I believe it can happen and I believe it is happening. And I know that it’s happening in people’s homes all over California, especially. I know it’s happening all over the country where people are beginning to talk about what happened because I think Mormons share a part, and there are many, and are beginning to see that this is causing a division and with good Mormons that I know of who aren’t like that. They bristle at the thought that this would cause a division. I think there is a beautiful minority who are beginning to step forward and say, “We caused pain and we have to dissect it and vow to never let this happen again.”

CS: I was really impressed with the narration of [Oscar winning writer of Milk] Dustin Lance Black. As well as Steven Greenstreet, who did the wonderful documentary Killer At Large who I actually interviewed a couple of years ago. How did these people attach themselves to the picture? Obviously, it’s great that they did, but how did the become aware of it?

COWAN: Well, first of all, Dustin Lance Black”¦.I’m a journalist and I’m aware of a young girl in the Midwest who was doing her school project on Harvey Milk and her teachers would not allow her to bring that to class and, of course, that made the news. So, I contacted him on his Facebook page and asked if he would have any interest in talking to this girl because I think she would really be bolstered by you talking to her and he responded and out of that grew a friendship and he began to see the research and work I was doing on this film and when the time was right I asked him if he would participate and he interrupted filming on What’s Wrong With Virginia, he’s almost wrapped with it now, he interrupted production to narrate this film. So, that’s how that happened.

Steven Greenstreet came on the scene for me about halfway through my process. I had found online that he did a piece for AmericanNewsProject called Proposition 8 ““ Did Mormons Go Too Far? I contacted him and I purchased his footage, I purchased some of his documentation, and after we got into Sundance it was abundantly clear that we needed all hands on deck. So I brought Steven on as a producer and editor of the project and then by virtue of the hours he put into the film in the last few months of production I said I would give him co-director credit. So that was all I could do and that’s how it all evolved. It’s how all those relationships evolved and those relationships are indicative of many that came together to make this film. So many people all over the country.

prop-8-la-mormon-demo-cCS: And I think that one of the overriding things, at least I was thinking looking at my notes, was why did the church see something in California as an issue that they really wanted to try to get behind?

COWAN: Of course we know that as California goes, so goes the rest of the nation. And I think Mormons thought, “Oh God. Oh Heavenly Father. If gay marriage happens in California, it’s going to happen all over.” The Mormons in their call, as you saw in the movie said indeed we are compelled by our faith to speak out and I think that really is at the root of it all.

The Mormons think that the only way to achieve the highest level in heaven is to be baptized a Mormon, to be married man to woman in the Mormon temple, to progress to godhood on your own planet where men can marry multiple wives and make many multitudes of babies and inhabit their own planet and repeat the cycle. Mormons teach that man is what God once was and God is what man may become. And so the doctrine is “Look, man to woman, man to multiple woman, babies and gay people don’t fit into that picture.” I truly think that Mormons, I don’t think, I know from my own training that Mormons see gay people as an interruption in the grand scheme of heaven. And that has to be corrected or extinguished.

CS: And you’re no longer a Mormon, correct?

COWAN: I left the Mormon Church years ago. Ironically, not over this issue but I left the Mormon Church after my Mormon mission because I served the church in a country where there is a beautiful proud African American population and I could never get a straight answer from any of them as to why the Church I was knocking doors for didn’t allow full participation from African Americans until 1978. And finally if I couldn’t get an adequate explanation, I can’t put my name on it and I won’t.

CS: There was a mother couldn’t witness her own child being married in a temple here across town because she, herself, was not Mormon. The boy went to the process of being one but she had to actually wait for them to leave the temple and celebrate outside. It seems like such a harsh thing to have happened. Is this just a religion that is like like any other religions or is there something more deeply seeded that it makes you want to come back and say, “What is really going on in that church?”

COWAN: As to that Mormons believe that the ceremony that literally binds and seals a husband to a wife for time and eternity is one of the most sacred ceremonies that is performed in their tradition. And only those who are Mormon who pay 10% of their income to the Mormon Church, who keep the moral code, who keep the physical code or not drinking, smoking, drugs, coffee, tea, only those who keep the highest strictest moral codes, financial codes, can go into the temple to witness that.

My own grandmother who passed away a year and a half ago was an angel. Truly, one of the finest people I have ever known in my life and was not a Mormon and had to sit out at my sisters wedding. And what I found ironic was that was the last time I went into a temple because I had to leave my Grandma parked on the curb to go watch my sister get married. And all the while my aunts and uncles could go up and I looked around the room and saw in their marriages that perhaps there were some dishonest business practices going on in their lives but they were allowed to go in and witness this marriage. And my own Grandma who lived a simple, beautiful, pure life was not. And that is a sting for most people but people have to understand from the outside that Mormons believe they are the one and only true religion on the face of the earth that you cannot go to the highest level of heaven unless you are baptized Mormon and marry in the Mormon Temple.

And, there are strict hurdles to go over in order to achieve all those benchmarks in Mormon life and their objective is to convert everyone whether they are alive or dead. You don’t get into a temple easily and that’s just how it is.

2010-01-13-prop81CS: In the movie as well, at what point, again it started out as a project on the homeless gay teen population in Utah, at one point did you see that activism involves more than just holding a sign or saying something out loud, that it actually involves getting involved and doing things?

COWAN: Well, as a former Mormon who went through those very sacred, secret temple ceremonies, I know what the secret handshakes are and I know what the language is and in the Temple you make promises, the Mormons call them covenants to God, upon which you entire, eternal salvation and the salvation of your children is based. And they use covenant language. And in the film we show, which is the answer to your question, I know that it was big. It was bigger than just a call to arms and it was a holy war and that when Mormons use that sacred language of the Mormon Temple. Means and time.

In the Mormon Temple you covenant to dedicate your means and time to the church. So when Mormons heard the call from their leadership in Salt Lake ““ use those trigger words, it turned simple activism or advocacy into a holy war against gay people. Because everything is out the window at that point their own adherence to their own covenant, to their own promise is in that temple were on the line. And I would imagine many Mormons went home and thought in the privacy of their bedrooms said to their wives and husbands, “My gosh, they used the words means and time and we made these covenants and not only should get involved, but we must if we value the salvation of our entire family.”

Serious, serious stuff to Mormons.

CS: And at what point do you see an end game from the stance that 50 years ago we’d be talking about the white and black population ““ the issues of racism now that we look back on it now and say, “Oh my God, there was a drinking fountain that said for Whites Only, for Blacks Only…” Do you have it in your head about what has to happen before we look at this and go, “What were we wasting our lives doing?”

mormonCOWAN: I believe in a population that can get “when we know better, we can do better.” I always talk about he civil rights struggle and how at one point people had televisions and on the television they saw the police use night sticks on African American brothers and sisters and they saw the fire cannons and saw the fire hoses turned on these people and saw how inhumane that was. And they saw the beam that bigotry leveled on people and their families and I really think that’s why our film is important.

I do believe the arc of history bends towards justice and I do believe that people will see what happened and they will choose better. I really believe that. And I was on the radio recently with a man from California, a very successful man from California who happens to be an active Mormon and he said no longer are Mormons appealing to educated people, we’re appealing to uneducated people land people and people of different segments of the population, we’re not appealing to the young people anymore. To me, eventually the Mormons are going to have to see that if they are going to survive by way of numbers, they are going to have to be a more inclusive organization and they are going to have to teach their people to be more inclusive with gay people.

CS: Well, Reed, I know our time is short and I have just one more question to ask you and that is that now that this is done and you’ve seen the response its gotten, where are you emotionally, mentally, about moving forward in your own personal space? Are you hopeful for what’s around the corner? I realize this is a big blow to everyone when this was defeated but how are you going forward now that you made this film?

COWAN: I adopted two little boys a year ago on Thursday and my personal space is defined by them and I am as motivated and as hopeful as you can ever be when you look into the eyes of two little twin boys who deserve to be raised in a relationship where their parents enjoy the full benefits and protections, rights, privileges, blessings, of full marriage equality. I am very hopeful and I am very determined and very passionate that before I draw my last breath my children will be able to say that the family they were raised in was seen as important and as crucial to society as their peers and that’s where my hope lies.

June 23, 2010

FREDagator: 2010-06-23

Filed under: FREDagator — UncaScroogeMcD @ 11:20 pm

fredagator.png

lucyline.gif

Don’t be caught flat-footed! Grab your towel & watch the Hitchhiker’s Guide To The Daleks…

[ad#contestbox]

BIG BROTHER Blog Report: Day 14

Filed under: Articles,TV News — Tags: , — Aaron @ 8:24 am

soapbox-header.png

Day 14

lucyline.gif

The nominations this week are Dave, Govan, Shabby and Ben. At the time of writing this that could change as the housemates will do a task to avoid eviction so I won’t get into the voting too much.

There is only one thing on my mind today: Crazy lesbian love.

From day 1 I’ve had a problem with Shabby. This was initially based on her upper-class squatter, “independent actress” (you were in Casualty love, that’s not independent), suspenders and hat wearing nonsense. She tries too hard to be “wacky” and it drives me up the wall. It’s false and it’s pretentious which in turn is exactly how I feel about her.

However, what I didn’t expect to see from her was all her teenage hormones flow out in a mess on national television. You see Shabby is in love with her best friend, her best friend has a boyfriend. It’s super kinky lesbian/straight girl forbidden love. And she can’t stand it anymore.

shabby-caoimhe

Love me, love me, say that you’ll love me

Now it would be mean of me to point out that Caoimhe looks like a white Grace Jones. That her manlike features and large breasts are the perfect storm for lesbian attention grabbing. That Caoimhe is a clit-teaser leading her friend on purely for the attention and the fact that she is a whore for anything that moves. It would be mean of me to say such things so I won’t. But it doesn’t mean I’m not thinking it.

I don’t really feel bad for Shabby in this scenario either. I’ve noted here before that I feel she’s a raving lunatic but I didn’t realise why before. She has either regressed or always was about 6 years younger than her age. Wild mood swings, constantly horny. I can sympathize with having these symptoms (I’m self aware) but she’s crossing over into creepy territory.

On more than one occasion now Shabby has cornered Caoimhe alone and confessed her feelings. The first time she did this was pretty funny considering how Ife set the whole thing up but if Shabby was a grown up about it in the first place it never would have become such a big deal. Since then she hasn’t shut up expressing her undying love.

The Tree of Temptation (brilliant) gave Shabby a task to stick with Ben and be super nice to him for a day. The prize: a romantic meal with a fellow housemate. It was no surprise that Shabby was going to choose Caoimhe for this but it was highly inappropriate considering A) Caoimhe has a serious boyfriend and B) She’s a friend you’ve just admitted to fancying. It’s just got the words awkward written all over it. And it was.

bigb-meal_0610

Would you like some of my fish taco?

But what I thought was hilarious about it all was afterward Shabby couldn’t contain the secret of her task and risked a nasty punishment by confessing her mission to Caoimhe. What was the point in doing it? Shabby needed to tell Caoimhe what she did for her because Shabby thought it was an amazing gesture of love.

Pathetic.

Will this affect her chances of eviction? Probably not. I’m sure the public are probably lapping up all the unrequited love. It’s soap opera stuff. But I personally think that it’s getting a bit weird now. It’s almost as bad as Mario and Ben

Almost.

I’ll be back when someone has been kicked out.

Aaron Poole
Follow Aaron on Twitter – @AaronFever

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress