FRED Entertainment

September 30, 2005

Trailer Park: ALL OVER THE PLACE

Filed under: Trailer Park — admin @ 7:45 pm

E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES By Christopher Stipp

September 30, 2005

ALL OVER THE PLACE

Since there is no need in pointlessly wasting your time today with any one topic, I’ve got nothing boiling my blood to an acceptable temperature, or any one thought, as my schizophrenic mind keeps giving me new people to meet and greet, I’d thought I’d do a quick blow by blow of the goings on inside the Trailer Park for the past few days.

1. Henry Rollins has a wicked awesome movie show on IFC. I only by chance stumbled upon it and have been TiVoing the damn thing ever since. I’ve encountered so many people enamored by the glitz of all that Hollywood purports itself to be, and sated by its morphine-like inducement of false bliss, but Henry doesn’t care, give shrift or give in to any of the trappings associated with how one should conduct himself in the presence of movie “stars.” The man shoots not from the hip but shoots with both hands on the end of his verbal shotgun and its all I can do just to stay up with the man as he rolls through his thoughts of whatever is on his mind. I’ve never seen him play with Black Flag, I’ve never caught his spoken word act and the only real exposure I’ve had to him was his stints in that one awful Charlie Sheen movie, THE CHASE, and that one good one starring Val Kilmer, HEAT. The man is a verbal terrordome. Henry’s Film Corner is currently on hiatus until 2006. Just set your TiVo and forget about it to catch some reruns.

2. Good things happen to those who keep things happening. A while ago I reviewed the trailers and even reviewed the films for FILMIC ACHIEVEMENT and BROKEN (A flick that actually received honorable praise from Roger Ebert mere weeks ago, wOOt!) in this wee little space. In addition to these films I even reviewed the trailers for ROUNDING FIRST and KISSES AND CAROMS. I enjoyed the trailers for all of the films and I was completely pleased that both FILMIC, BROKEN and KISSES ended up being such great pieces of independent cinema. If you want to see what’s bubbling under the surface of big Hollywood’s take on “independent film,” the modestly budgeted and star-packed vehicles which purport to be constructed on a shoestring, make it a point to wander around these people’s sites and take a look. It’s been a while since we’ve had anyone in the audience send in a trailer for their own film and if you dare to be exposed to the masses for the fraud hack you psychologically think you are then by all means send me a link to your trailer and I’ll let the written abuse begin.

Update: filmmaker Kevin Kervin of FILMIC ACHIEVEMENT sent in this note to me and all the ‘Shooters out there in the LA area:

“Hey Christopher: Hey Christopher: I hope you’re doing well. I’m getting in touch because Filmic has been enjoying a nice festival run, we won an award at the Stratford-Upon-Avon Int’l Film Festival and had good screenings at the Kansas Int’l Film Festival and Big Bear Lake Film Festival and others. Our next screening is on Monday, October 10 at 6 PM at Mann Chinese 6 Theaters. This film plays great in a full theater so we’re really trying to get the word out on the screening. So thanks for all your help and support!

“The ‘Spinal Tap’ of film school…” Cleveland Int’l Film Festival
“…offers laughs for everyone…” Kansas City Star
“…a towering achievement in laughter.” Cleveland Plain Dealer
“…a small piece of inspired greatness.” moviepoopshoot.com

“…a hilarious look at film school sub-culture.” -cinematical.com

FILMIC ACHIEVEMENT will screen in Hollywood at the Mann Chinese 6 Theaters inside the Hollywood and Highland Center. The screening is sponsored by the Foundation for the Advancement of Independent Film (FAIF) and will be Monday, October 10th at 6:00 PM. Director Kevin Kerwin and Producer Kate O’Neil will attend the screening and invite you to stay after for a Q&A session.

Parking inside the Hollywood and Highland Center is $2 with your movie ticket. Tickets are $12.50 and are on sale at the Mann Chinese Theater box office.

Get out next week, people, and support a really enjoyable independent movie.

3. Free stuff. Next week, in this space, I have a whole new contest to win one of the best movies I’ve seen this year. Actually, you’ll have a chance to win one of five copies of the best movies I’ve seen this year. The margin of error is +/- a drama or borderline indie but I’m comfortable in my choice.

4. From the What The Hell Does This Have To Do With Anything Department: I finally graduated this week with my Master’s degree. (Insert applause or indifference here) Along with Squib’s Josh J that makes a minimum of two people with graduate degrees working at a site dedicated to championing the very things most literati would just as soon write off as the musings of people in some state of arrested development. I bring this up because I can now devote some time to pimping my book. With a cover drawn by artiste extraordinaire, Jim Mahfood, a powerfully talented man whose skills are disappointedly underutilized, as he should easily be in Wizard’s Top Ten for artists but I understand his distain for the world ruled by superheroes and chicks with boobs that would easily break the back of any normal woman with normal mammaries. If you haven’t read Kevin’s Boring Ass Life in a while get your sad fingers clicking and check out the live mural he rocked on the wall during the MALLRATS 10th anniversary signing at the Secret Stash in California this past weekend. The man is amazing; nothing short of amazing. The book, being a first work of self-indulgent piece of prose, isn’t all that terrible. If you dig what I’m doing here then I most certainly won’t disappoint. If you hate me you’ll only want to burn my book even more while wearing a pointy white mask and cape whilst straddling your horse, carrying a torch in your hand and asking your fellow triple K’ers to follow suit. If you’re interested in snagging a copy, email me at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com and I’ll tell you that a while a fool and his money are soon parted this won’t hurt as bad. Promise.

5. The debut of OLIVER TWIST, a film by Roman Polanski, has this man in the global spotlight once more. A recent CNN article says, “Today, Polanski is among the world’s most admired directors. Though a sex crime dating back nearly three decades has cast a shadow over his career, he has found work, financing and artistic support in Europe.” Just a quick FYI: He’s still a fugitive from United States law enforcement for skipping out on his sentencing for ADMITTING he raped and drugged a 13 year-old. Disregarding his directorial work, for just a moment, the man is still a detestible demon and anyone who wants to say different needs to have their warped apologist reality tweaked. I guess if it doesn’t happen to your own daughter it doesn’t really count. That said, go out and enjoy OLIVER TWIST, I’ve heard pedophelia does wonders for one’s own creativity.

On that jubilacious sour note tune in next week as I prostelyze from the mountain about what could be the unsung powerhouse of cinema which still resonates with me, months after seeing it. And I swear all the actresses used in this particular production asked for

I need to lighten the mood just a smidge before you all launch into this week’s column. Now, I normally wouldn’t include something like this but this picture of Sheryl Crow scared the ever loving crap out of me this week. I feel it is my civic duty to all Americans to tell everyone who’s thinking about approaching this magazine to walk up to it like you’re Harry Hamlin in CLASH OF THE TITANS when he’s about to decapitaite Medusa and is using his shield to prevent himself from being turned into stone. At first I honestly thought this was a dude, I really did, but I was aghast when I realized that this was actually someone of the female, genetic population. Someone should really give this woman a sandwich. I wish I were kidding but, come on, this is downright spooky and it’s not even Halloween yet. Fiona Apple’s faux tortured puckish scowl doesn’t do this cover any favors, either.


SARAH SILVERMAN: JESUS IS MAGIC (2005) Director: Liam Lynch
Cast: La’vin Kiyano, Bob Odenkirk, Brian Posehn, Laura Silverman, Sarah Silverman, Brody Stevens
Release: November 11, 2005
Synopsis: Narrative digressions on sex, race, politics, and more from comedienne Sarah Silverman.
View Trailer:
* Medium (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Nothing but love… I loathe it, I personally dislike it in ways that are severe, when people use the word edgy. The word has lost its cache and meaningfulness yet people who possess a modicum of talent seem to think it connotes a real deep insight into a piece of work. It doesn’t because usually anything called “edgy” isn’t. This trailer is edgy.

I’m going to go ahead and say that if you are anywhere near someone who gets offended easily, moderately or even difficultly do not play this trailer within ear shot. This is perhaps one of the truest and bravest pieces of marketing I have ever seen. The fact that to put together this reel took balls and that the balls of the person who did it doesn’t have balls I think says a lot.

That said, there is no way in hell you’ll be seeing this in front of any movie in the theater or in commercials between Scrubs and ER on NBC should you find yourself at home watching Must See TV one Thursday night.

“I was licking jelly off of my boyfriend’s penis and all of a sudden I’m thinking “˜Oh my God, I’m turning into my mother,’ you know?”

I remember seeing snippets of Sarah Silverman perform the song which plays throughout this trailer a while ago. The fact that it is the base for this trailer is wonderful as there isn’t any outside influences diluting what the finished product of this movie is all about. It’s all about Sarah and it shows.

“I love you even if it’s not hip”¦I love you more than black people don’t tip”¦”

30 seconds are spent showcasing the variety of things going on inside the contents of this movie. What’s apparent is that Sarah isn’t going for the straight I’m-here-performing-and-this-is-all-about-my-comedy-act. She steps outside of the norms of what’s expected in a full-length feature and there is a nice blend of actual stage performance and sketch comedy.

When we break away from the musical montage there is a nice extended moment when Sarah explains that she wrote a show to a couple of friends of hers. It’s one that deals with the Holocaust and AIDS but, as Sarah hastens to add, it’s funny. The moment is quickly captured and as we roll on even further into the depths of what will, most likely, draw ire from those who feel her type of humor is crass, debased and devoid of anything coming close to comedy, depending on shock value for her share of giggles and guffaws, I can only say that my interest level only rises.

Sure, there could have been other ways one could have shaped this trailer to make it more consumer friendly but in an age when ribald humor is finally getting its due, thanks in part to the wonderful press THE ARISTOCRATS received as of late, I can’t say enough about a trailer that finishes with such aplomb.

There is not much you can put into words about what’s funny about this little piece of promotional material but even though what’s funny to one and what’s funny to another is debatable there is no way in hell anyone could go away from this without feeling something.


THE BOYS OF BARAKA (2005) Director: Heidi Ewing, Rachel Grady
Cast: NA
Release: November 30, 2005 (New York)
Synopsis: On September 12, 2002 twenty “at risk” 12-year-old boys from the tough streets of inner-city Baltimore left home to attend the 7th and 8th grade at Baraka, an experimental boarding school located in Kenya, East Africa. Here, faced with a strict academic and disciplinary program as well as the freedom to be normal teenage boys, these brave kids began the daunting journey towards putting their lives on a fresh path.
“The Boys of Baraka” focuses on four boys: Devon, Montrey, Richard and his brother Romesh. Their humor and explicit truthfulness give intimate insight into their optimistic plans, despite the tremendous obstacles they face both at home and in school. Through extensive time with the boys in Baltimore and in Africa, the film captures the kids’ amazing journeyÉ and how they fare when they are forced to return the difficult realities of their city.

“The Boys of Baraka” zeros in on kids that society has given up on – – boys with every disadvantage, but who refuse to be cast off as “throw-aways.”

View Trailer:
* Medium (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Positive. There’s something that changes you when you step foot off American soil and you find yourself many thousands of miles away from your comfort zone.

It’s a transformation which requires you to find new ways of communicating, understanding, interacting and it demands you either do as the Romans do or find yourself labeled as an Ugly American, one who wants to bend their will against the wills of those in a house which is not yours. I think that’s why I find this trailer oddly compelling.

We open up without a real indication of where the narrative is going. On the outside it feels like it’s just another episode of Undercover America on HBO, looking at the drug trade on American streets, this time in Baltimore, Maryland. We see some guys pushing each other in front of a house, prelude to a fight. A cop rolls down a street as music plays in the background. There is no voiceover.

We see a young man walk up a flight of steps alone. He sits on a windowsill and looks out onto the street. He says he stays inside the house most of the time. You look at him and he exudes a loneliness which is honestly heartbreaking. He understands that his peers are drug dealers who deal in the kinds of activities that explain why some young men don’t make it to their twenties.

The odd thing is that you don’t yet get the point of what’s happening in this film. You that it has something to do with looking at the effects of violence but you don’t know what it is going to be set against. That’s where I think the gradual take-off of this trailer comes when we see some of the very same lonely boys being gathered at the local airport. They’re literally leaving on a jet plane, one of them in tears, and leaving the country for a little while.

The destination ends up being Africa but I’m innately curious as to what the point is to shipping these boys off to another country and then I see it: they’re going to school. Although, since this is a documentary, this is going to be more than how well they learn the proper way to conjugate a verb.

“I have a feeling you’re going to find a whole lot of things different here than they were in Baltimore”¦”

Another part that’s intriguing about the trailer is that these boys have a moment in front of the “Confessional” video camera to send a postcard of sorts back home. Most of the boys express their desire to come back home. They’re not enamored with the possibilities that Africa has to offer. One boy lists the treats he wants sent to him but we get the point: no one wants to be here. The rhetorical statement which is asked of the audience, whether 10,000 miles can make a difference, is one that piques my desire to know if it has. I am sure that some aren’t, international travel isn’t a cure-all, but I am interested to know if it worked for those few who could’ve been another victim of inner-city neglect.


SUENO (2005) Director: Renee Chabria
Cast: John Leguizamo, Elizabeth Peña, Ana Claudia Talancon, Nestor Serrano
Release: September 30, 2005
Synopsis: A Mexian immigrant new to Los Angeles enters into a love triangle with two very different women.
View Trailer:
* Medium (Windows Media)

Prognosis: I’d dip in corn meal, fry it and hit it two times while dancing to a meringue beat. I like it a lot. Sra. Ruiz will always go down as the woman who gave me one of the only C’s I ever received in college.

It was Spanish 202 and this class was representative of the 3 years of Spanish language classes I took in high school and the 2 years I had to take in college. I went through all of that and I still couldn’t get my shit together by the end. I homogenously sucked ass, this much I admit, but I just could not get a good grasp on the whole conjugation thing. And there is also the Latina I dated in high school (Veronica Arreola, represent! wOOt!), who will go down as one of two women that I use every once in a while to brag about my racial blindness; whether people just chalk it up to adolescent horniness is another matter entirely. What these two seemingly divergent interests should show, if nothing else, is that the Spanish/Mexican vida has always been an interest for me. I may not ultimately get it but trailers like this one that show me why my passion for it has never waned. This trailer lingers with you like a slow Spanish guitar, plucking strings at just the right, mellow, pace.

This picture crackles with ingenuity.

John Leguizamo thankfully takes the responsibilities of voicing the trailer’s narration as we get a peek into what brings us to his backwater home which is located south of the border. We don’t spend a lot of wasted time getting to know John’s character and we’re seemingly pushed into the middle of his exposition about how he landed in Los Angeles. This could be a bit jarring for some but not a moment is wasted and a trailer maker who understands the economy of time really cuts things to the quick. The film appears normal enough but things take an LSD induced turn to the right when John talks of his old village elders which, I guess, have cartoons jutting out of their chests like a fire hydrant of Technicolor on a pretty conistent basis. It’s weird, yes, but I appreciate the attempt to briefly contextualize John’s experiences and it only adds a certain flavor to the trailer when he see him in his new life, north of the border, in a crap job, Mickey Dee’ing it. The accompanying music in the background, the animations which move it along, just fit in nicely to the gritty, real vibe of this movie.

John wants to be a musician and the little moments we get of him practicing, slumming it wherever he can to get a little exposure, a little attention.

We get a little clichéd with the set-up of the snotty neighbor who doesn’t want John playing his guitarra till all hours of the night and, who we find out, secretly used to sing, gave it up for some “unknown reason” BUT who will regain her passion because of John and his trusty six string steed. It’s all well and good and touchy-feely but as soon as I think this is where it all begins and ends we get ourselves a love interest. I dunno what her name is, I don’t know what her role will be in John’s life but I do know John wants to hit that and I would have to heartily second that hitting. The romance is quickly established and run through and this is the reason why the trailer catches my attention. You have two seemingly diverse interests at play at the same time but we’re not very clear on how they will either miss each other or collide.

I like that kind of uncertainty in the trailers I watch.

The music and tempo change and even though we get another cliché with John saying how one needs to grab their dream when it comes along or else you’ll regret burning in a hell fire of your own making, blah blah blah, I still believe in the appeal of this movie. This honestly looks like a film where not only could it be one of those feel good pictures where something good comes out of a struggle for something important there also seems to be an element of meticulous filmmaking. The direction and the visual flair could make it worth the price of admission alone. And how the hell can you go wrong with Nestor Serrano, the man who completely dominated the MONEY PIT with Tom Hanks in his portrayal of Julio?


EVERYTHING IS ILLUMINATED (2005) Director: Liev Schreiber
Cast: Elijah Wood, Eugene Hutz, Boris Leskin
Release: September 16, 2005 (Limited)
Synopsis: Based on the critically-acclaimed novel by Jonathan Safran Foer, “Everything is Illuminated” tells the story of a young man’s quest to find the woman who saved his grandfather in a small Ukrainian town that was wiped off the map by the Nazi invasion. What starts out as a journey to piece together one family’s story under the most absurd circumstances turns into a surprisingly meaningful journey with a powerful series of revelations — the importance of remembrance, the perilous nature of secrets, the legacy of the Holocaust, the meaning of friendship and, most importantly, love.
View Trailer:
* Medium (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Erring on the side of negativity. I can’t be sure if I like this trailer.

I am a fan of odd things but I am thoroughly confounded at the weirdness this trailer stirs in me.

Let me see if I can’t break this thing down in a meaningful way: Elijah Wood is a collector. The strange thing about his collecting is that he seems completely indiscriminate about the things he obtains. We see a shot of this massive wall with items all tacked on the wall, a lot of things, but there’s nothing really defining what these little baggies of odd things means to anyone.

Cut to Elijah sitting next to his dying grandmother who gives him a black and white photograph of his grandfather standing next to a strange woman. Without so much as thanking the old bag the kid asks who the woman is in the picture; too late to get an answer, though, as the grandma dies right there.

What’s a boy to do? Road trip.

The plane flight arrival, the oompa-loompa Germanic beer band music welcome wagon is a bit absurd, as is the quirky local translator, but the point of going to find the woman who saved this young man’s grandfather in World War II is an interesting premise if not foolhardy.

Right when we get going a little further into the narrative we get our quirky translator to explain that the Yugo mode of transportation is being driven by a man who thinks he’s blind, but isn’t, and has a psychotic seeing-eye dog which tags along with him. It’s a bit much for a film that I am thinking is trying to be meaningful but its quirks are beginning to overshadow its aims. I am especially reminded of this when, after a long day of travel, Frodo looks at his singular bed in a very wide, very long room. His translator friend asks him to secure his door as there are people who like to steal things from Americans, as well as kidnap them.

What’s the thrust here? Is this a comedy or is Elija’s straight man routine a juxtaposition against an insane reality which doesn’t really exist in real life? None of these questions get satisfactorily answered as the strangeness continues. The not-funny exchange between the translator and Elijah about what it means to be a vegetarian drags me even further into a state of malaise about something which should really be interesting.

This is not to say there isn’t any hope, however. When we finally get to an honest exchange of ideas between these two guys, the translator and Elijah, the trailer does elevate itself to a place where I feel like I connect with it. When asked why Elijah does the things he does he says it’s because he doesn’t want to forget. The ensuing musical interlude gets even more poignant when we see a line of five Jewish men lined up against a wall. They all wear yellow stars, indicative of the Nazi regime’s agenda of ethic cleansing, and, as the camera pulls back, we see that they’re about to get shot. It’s eye-popping and it sobers one up to where we’re going with this story.

There are a few more plot points which are revealed in the span of the remaining moments of this trailer but it really does pull up on the controls for what could have been a straight drop to the earth from earlier indications.

I can’t say for sure who this movie best appeals to but I think that’s one of the worst things a trailer can leave a person thinking. I’m not sure I would spend money to see this in the theater but I can see myself splurging on a rental to see what this quirky comedy/drama/oddity is all about.


MEMOIRS OF A GEISHA (2005) Director: Rob Marshall
Cast: Ziyi Zhang, Ken Watanabe, Gong Li, Michelle Yeoh, Koji Yakusho, Cary-Hiroyuki Tagawa, Tsai Chin
Release: December 9th, 2005
Synopsis: This is the story of Nitta Sayuri (Ziyi Zhang), sold to a geisha house at the age of 9, the training she goes through to become a geisha, and the life she leads as one. Based on the popular novel written by Arthur Golden.
View Trailer:
* Medium (QuickTime, Windows Media)

Prognosis: Positive. This movie seems to star a veritable who’s who of Asian cinema. This is quite delightful when you realize that Ziyi Zhang takes the role of the voiceover duties when we open on a steep and chilly looking mountain, talking about how this is a story that needs to be told. Of course it does, otherwise why would Hollywood wait so many years to adapt a bestseller that millions of people already have read? Never minding the grandiose hyperbole which overstates the importance of this flick we are treated to the obviously manipulative tactic of showing how our Ziyi was wrenched away from her family in order to be sold into child slavery. We, as an audience, have to immedietly ally our sympathies to the girl, of course, and so every moment here on in is tinged with the feeling that we have to pity Ziyi. I don’t think it’s really right or wrong to go for the easy buy-in but for the adult audience this flick is aimed at it’s probably the best method to use.

“I certainly wasn’t born into the life of a geisha”¦”

So, the montage continues with a lovely classical music suite as we show how young Ziyi is taken from her home, taken in by a Carol Burnette clone a la ANNIE and is put through her paces as a young indentured laborer, probably in more ways than one, before a smiling Ken Wantanabe takes a shine to the girl. Now, I have never read GEISHA but I can’t for the life of me determine whether his sinister grin means “I think you’re a delightful sprite” or “Have you ever heard the saying “˜If there’s grass on the infield”¦’?” Now I think it means the former but you’re never quite sure in this age of books where the shocking is just taken as the norm but here’s to hoping that Ken keeps it wrapped in his pants.

Ziyi, though, is selected to become a Geisha. There is a sub-montage of the training she has to go through in order to become a sexualized object of patriarchical desire. It’s way hot.

I freak, though, when Ziyi puts on a whole lotta white face. Her black eyeballs make her look like a Great White ready to devour any approaching life force. Yeah, it’s scary until we see our young protégé and Yeoh without shirts, having a giggle. I’m energized and riveted by the prospect at some full-on Asian loving. I know only too well that the PG rating will shoot down that prospect and I will have to defer to the plethora of Internets which will satisfy that curiosity.

What happens next is an oddity to me. I know it may not be for some who find history of the geisha movement interesting reading but I never knew that geishas were, themselves, showgirls of sorts.

The tempo changes, we get a little more speed built up in the quick cuts used to show Ziyi’s quick ascension as a top billed act. All is not well in paradise, however, as there is some jealousy between our lady and some jealous ho who wishes she was all that and a bag of Kashi . The covetous bitch even tries to pull out a mini knife, much like the one used by the dude/chick, I still don’t know, honestly I don’t, in INDIANA JONES AND THE TEMPLE OF DOOM when he/she tried to dispense of Short Round after using he/she’s voodoo knife on a scarecrow looking Dr. Jones. A catfight ensues, much to my delight, again making a mental note to defer to the Internets for a more “comprehensive” compendium of full-on chick combat, and we eventually get it that Ziyi is whisked away from this brutish life by Wantanabe.

He seems to treat her right, there aren’t any signs he’s using her in any manner unbecoming of a gentleman but there is trouble in paradise as Ziyi wants to exert control over the situation she’s in. I’m not sure where this tale of female empowerment eventually leads us but the pandering moment of bombastic protestations of how Ziyi wants her own life and how she’s her own woman is a bit much. I realize this is important but it’s used to sell me on the idea of the movie and I don’t think it’s needed here.

The resulting montage of clips that really don’t have anything to do with the cohesion of the narrative, and it’s frankly disorienting, seems a bit lazy and unfocused. I’m not sure if this adult approved will even be worth to see but the three things that make me think I may venture forth is that I liked CHICAGO and I like Michelle Yeoh and Ziyi Zhang even more.

September 23, 2005

Trailer Park: SOME DEAD HORSE FUN

Filed under: Trailer Park — admin @ 7:44 pm

E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES By Christopher Stipp

September 23, 2005

SOME DEAD HORSE FUN

One of the things that mystifies me about the new production of X-MEN 3 is the quantity of mutants that will be crawling around the screen looking for a little time in front of the camera. So many odd choices have been made to flesh out the mutant landscape it almost begs whether the phalanx of hearty X-Men who will be fighting for screen presence will be used as puppets to show or tell.

What I mean by this is that there seems to be, with all the announcements of who will make it into the final cut, some issue as to whether this will be a movie predicated on the displays of multiple humanoids with powers or whether there will be a story behind it all. I think if you look back at what made the first X-Men and X2 so great was that there was a concern for the essence of what the property so valuable in the first place.

I bring this all up, not that anyone needs my additional .02 into the matter as the poop is being flung like it’s Fiber-Con Day in the monkey house on the Internets, because I see some real talent which could be put to good use being put at risk by someone who is better off directing the next piece of milquetoast cinema he feels will help perpetuate the notion he is good at what he does. I realize that’s a little harsh and it is. If we’re going to be civil about this we really should take an honest look into the mind of the man who unleashed THE FAMILY MAN, AFTER THE SUNSET and a cadre of Mariah Carey videos unto the world. Even that’s being unfair as I am, I admit, consciously overlooking the star wattage of MONEY TALKS, which was good, I admit, for the first 10 minutes before I realize I was watching a Brett Ratner movie, and RUSH HOUR. I’m sure the latter was made because Brett just knew even a busted clock has to be right at least twice a day, right?

And I do hope you realize I’m trying to be comedic about this? I don’t need a bunch of peeps flooding me with emails telling me how awesome and teh cool RUSH HOUR or RED DRAGON was, I appreciated both on a semi-conscious level for exactly what they were, and they made the studio system millions. The guy knows how to bring a mass audience to the trough to gobble his vapid slop up as he creates it. Where I take some contention, though, is some who say that it’s far too early to be able and criticize the man before he has a chance to prove what he can do with the calls to arms he has been making as of late; you’d think he’s trying to recruit soldiers for Iraq with the numbers he’s been showing for the mutant army. I call bullshiat on that. If I’ve seen his work, disagree with the way he makes films and think that his static style of directing and even weaker employment of story (Care to read the script for MONEY TALKS?) causes nerves to prickle at the thought that this is the guy who people trust to make a flick worthy to be put on the shelf next to Singer’s creations. On a side note: you must go check out Singer’s production diaries with regard to his work on SUPERMAN. I have no idea how good that will be but, as an informed consumer of his films, just as I am of Ratner’s films, I somehow, for some odd flippin’ reason, don’t have a care in the world about how SUPERMAN will turn out.

Somehow, and this may seem crazy to some people, but I know what Singer is capable of, how he comes to work and brings it on a daily basis to give a solid finished product that looks like it was baked with love, not tempered in dog shit like some other directors I know; Uwe Boll, sorry Bro, this does include you. If I was a suck ass employee and I did a half ass job with everything I’ve done, followed the corporate line and did everything in my power to make a final product which was more about placating stockholders and less about innovating and everyone knew this was my modus operandi, how would you feel if I came in today and became your boss? You’d probably be worried. I’m worried if for no other reason than you have a cast who deserve a lot better, a woman, as nuts as she is, who has an Oscar and a leading man who deserves more than the Tony and Emmy Award he has to prove that not only does he have the chops but he’s waiting for his close up. Too bad it’s going to be in a Brett Ratner movie.

Seeing Hugh this week on the Emmy’s just bursting with joi de vie at winning an award for basically being himself just proves what many already know: the guy is bottled lighting. The man is poised, and is winning recognition for, to do great things in the talkies. The prospect of seeing him being mashed and molded to fit a Ratner lens is troubling when you compare it to past work. It’s just like hearing a train whistle way off in the distance, seeing the smoke and just looking down and thinking, if you had to bet your life, if the track was laid down by Ratner and you had to make a guess as to whether this guy is going to make another blockbuster with a soul full of nothing or a flat crapfest which will signal the death knell for many a superhero flick which side of the tracks would you stand on? I’m thinking, just based on past experience, I might as well get struck by the Ratner Express as maybe that way I can just have this be a quick and easy release. No, I’m not a big fan of this man’s work but I do think this argument departs the normal tract of thinking insofar as I have hope. I want X3 to be a nerdish delight which will prove me wrong. I so badly want to be wrong about all of this and I am trying to reserve judgement until I can see whether it was all for naught.


GET RICH OR DIE TRYIN’ (2005) Director: Jim Sheridan
Cast: 50 Cent, Terrence Howard, Bill Duke
Release: November 9, 2005
Synopsis: A tale of an inner city drug dealer who turns away from crime to pursue his passion, rap music. Loosely based on the life of 50 Cent. Used to be titled “Locked and Loaded”.
View Trailer:
* Medium (Windows Media, QuickTime)

Prognosis: Negative. Ok players, 100 people were interviewed and the top 5 answers are up on the board. Give me one good reason why the man who directed IN THE NAME OF THE FATHER, MY LEFT FOOT and IN AMERICA would make a movie that glorifies an asshat rap stylist who has been shot 9 times and wants you to party like it’s your “birf-day” with some Bacardi in a movie about a good for nothing thug who has a yearning to become an entertainer on the stage?

BUZZ! “How about “˜I’ve got nuthin’?”

Damn, seriously, how do we go from IN AMERICA to this piece of 8 MILE/HUSTLE AND FLOW melodrama tripe?

I don’t think a trailer has set me off in such a rage than this one right here. I honestly believe this is a joke because there is no way I could imagine matching up the guy who is a walking billboard for misogyny, violence and mindless excess (much like if Whitesnake or Winger got their own films in the late 80’s) and who does nothing but want to reflect on letting us know how bad he had it in the streets but wants nothing to do with the obvious implications of what it means to be a spokesperson for this kind of lifestyle. But, whatever, right? Give the people their circuses and bread!

So, we start off with a view of a city at night. It doesn’t matter what city in America it is because we all know that in every small urban hamlet there are people racing down the streets with guns in their hands and firing up into the sky at rooftops like they’re effing Jack Ryan in CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER, trying to evade the Cali Cartel.

And then, before I have a chance to really goof on how the producers of this film, as throughout this trailer the marketing angle here is to try and imply that 50 or should I say Fiddy, as is the parlance, is somehow the protagonist when, by implication and his own admission, he is clearly and simply the antagonist of his own making. But, who gives a crap as long as he’s rocking his do-rag like a bad ass.

Bill Duke comes in and, for a moment, I am actually impressed. Duke plays the lord of all that is street crime for wherever part of New York this is taking place in and I admire his throaty voiceover about how these mean streets work; it’s all very blown up but I have to give it up for his pimp bowler hat. Plus, I liked him enough in PREDATOR and so he, at the very least, gets a pass just for his delivery of the phrase “Turn around”¦” to Carl Weathers. Bill Duke fan club member #608 right here, peeps.

We go from the initial set-up to Marcus, or Fiddy, chatting up some young lady when she asks what he does for a living. He says he’s a gangsta. Now, at this point, the boys Fiddy has around him all start to laugh nervously at this admission and even Fiddy has a little drunken giggle happening. I don’t know what this is supposed to imply but it’s almost as if no one is really should to know he’s a gangsta; I thought that’s what builds cred on the street but living on the mean streets of Downtown Chicago don’t compare I guess to New York.

Now, we go from the admission and subsequent protestation of his gangsta past to the actual act of an old-fashioned stick-up with guns. Apart from Fiddy’s bravado in not wearing any disguise and that he initially planned on not shooting anyone I am confused at how we move from his actions as a thief to one of the sympathetic victim who feels the need to leave his criminal life behind. It’s almost as if we’re going to treat his past actions like bankruptcy court and just forgive the debt. And what kind of dumb-ass holds a place up and doesn’t wear a disguise? Haven’t any of these dudes seen HEAT?

So, we move from the thuggery to the fact we discover he has an innate ability to rap over some beats. Now, like I said before, this smacks an awful lot of HUSTLE AND FLOW yet I am conflicted about why I feel these two stories are divergent. Oh, that’s right, one story is about a pimp trying to make it by following his passion and the other is about an assclown who loved to terrorize people. My mistake.

I get excited, again and for the last time, when Bill Duke, in all his scary glory, lets Fiddy know there is no escaping the thug life when he all of a sudden thinks that rapping is so much better than the life of shooting and robbing people. The resulting drive-by where Fiddy gets himself shot trying to leave this lifestyle is depicted as a very sad time where everyone wants him to rise above his nadir, both personally and physically. I was hoping for a dramatic death right there on the operating table but like everything else about this guy we’re not lucky enough for that to happen. And that’s when I see Terrence “HUSTLE AND FLOW” Howard.

Sigh.

I don’t know what role he’s playing in this film but I guess he figures that the story he was in was too good to only do it once. The resulting montage of Fiddy’s evasions of the thugs who come after him for rapping despairingly about them is a bit much. When he’s walking around in a bulletproof vest because there is so much lead being pointed at him I am reminded of Lloyd from DUMB AND DUMBER who asks Harry about what would’ve happened if the guy who shot him had done so in his face. It’s all very dramatic, I get it. His white do-rag around his head, his shirtless body only covered by a bulletproof vest, some dopey ass gloves which he feels the need to wear I guess to make his fingers kissably smooth to the ladies, I get where we’re going. I’m just not sure of how we got here.

This thing ends and I am feeling like Fran Drescher when Weird Al says he’s the new station manager. He slaps her desk and rumbles with an annoyed fury that she has to go through this process. I am just annoyed with this trailer.


NORTH COUNTRY (2005) Director: Niki Caro
Cast: Charlize Theron, Sean Bean, Woody Harrelson, Frances McDormand, Richard Jenkins, Sissy Spacek
Release: October 21, 2005
Synopsis: A fictionalized account of the first major successful sexual harassment case in the United States — Jenson vs. Eveleth Mines, where a woman who endured a range of abuse while working as a miner filed and won the landmark 1984 lawsuit. Formerly the “Untitled Niki Caro Project”.
View Trailer:
* Medium (QuickTime, Windows Media)

Prognosis: I’ll be at home washing my hair that night. Question for the group: Is there need for more movies where a woman’s plight to be equal with her male equals is the center of the film’s ethos?

I would argue there is, to a point, but that this one looks a little more interesting than the Lifetime Original movie of the week. Plus, above all else, Sean Bean is in this one so all definitely has to be right with the universe.

I wasn’t expecting much from the trailer, I’ll say that from the outset. When you see that this movie is rated R for “sequences involving sexual harassment” it seems unnecessarily inappropriate. I would think scenes involving sexual harassment is closer to the reason why you would want to have this movie play to audiences and not restrict people from seeing the crazy crap women have to put up with.

“Minnesota 1989, Inspired by a true story”

Anyway, the trailer opens up fairly innocuously. There is a delicate xylophone tinkering in the background doesn’t really give an idea of what this movie is about based on the first few seconds. Usually we, as an audience, get an idea a little quicker but the thrust of the trailer keeps pace with what’s expected for a flick that’s dealing with themes like this. Charlize does the voiceover work and that’s fab because we get the fact that she’s fresh of a divorce and she needs a job.

Like an angel from the sky who bequeaths the well-deserving some sort of earthy prize, Frances McDormand reprises that Minnesota FARGO-ian accent/role which makes it a pleasure to watch that movie over and over again. She plays the best friend part to Charleze and we understand that she is about to head into some rough work. When we see a whole lot of ground being blown up, a la ERNEST GOES TO CAMP, mining seems to be the name of the proverbial game.

I don’t know exactly what her job will be but we are all introduced to her new boss who says she must look, “Darn good under those clothes.” There is a moment where my nads crawl up my scrot, waiting for Charlize to twist this man’s nuts off but he laughs and says that all the women need to have a sense of humor.

Next you get the Charlize scene with her kids as she’s nearly crying, saying she’s going to make it work and that they should stick together and that family is what’s important, something to this effect, and you begin to ally your sympathies with her. It’s natural, manipulative but it’s effective. That’s why, in the next scene, when one of the male scrubs says he needs a body to help the other dudes, doing dude things, he winks and says that body shouldn’t be a fatty. Cue nad crawl.

I see where things are going.

The devolution of the working conditions only get worse as you see the men depicted as sexualized pigs in need of power to flex over the helpless ladies. You get Charlize depicted in a port-o-john as she’s being rocked back and forth before being, um, expelled out the front door when the other dudes tip it over. Charlize, of course, wants to rally against the institutionalized harassment. She wants to go tell the honchos at the corporation’s HQ. Of course some of the uglier ladies aren’t happy with her doing it as it means she’s going to be rocking the boat of complacency.

The response from the whiteys is obvious: they don’t care.

Charlize wants to do something and we get her emotional response to the events with a whole lot of crying. A whole lot. A lot. It’s a lot.

Somehow we get Woody “Hemp King” Harrelson involved as the lawyer who is going to go against these men, he obviously tells her that she doesn’t have a good chance of winning and that no woman will testify with her, etc”¦

The accompanying voiceover about how big the company is and the implications of a win are nationwide are to be expected as is more tears from Charlize when she says all she wants to do is to go to work.


WALK THE LINE (2005) Director: James Mangold
Cast: Joaquin Phoenix, Reese Witherspoon, Ginnifer Goodwin, Robert Patrick
Release: November 18, 2005
Synopsis: He picked cotton, sold door to door, and served in the Air Force. He was a voice of rebellion that changed the face of rock and roll. An outlaw before today’s rebels were born ““ and an icon they would never forget. He did all this before turning 30. And his name was Johnny Cash. WALK THE LINE explores the early years of the music legend, an artist who transcended musical boundaries to touch people around the globe. As his music changed the world, Cash’s own world was rocked by the woman who became the love of his life: June Carter.
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Positive. I’ll be honest, I was taken in by the visual splendor of this trailer.

Not that I think the cinematography is anything special, because it’s honestly nothing to write home about, but the trailer opens with no voice over, no people and it glides you into this world like two hands cupped beneath you.

“Rock N’ Roll Hall of Fame”¦”

The quiet din of an audience thirsty for something can be heard over the sound of a guitar. A prison in all its grey glory stands erect, cold, silent.

The guitar continues to play its singular note as the other notable achievements in Johnny Cash’s life dissolve by images of the insides for what is the place where Cash really brought down the house. The imagery of hands slapping down on the backs of chairs, the pogoing of them, reminiscent of THE BLUES BROTHERS all bring back that momentous time in history.

Then, we have a long piece of film. It’s odd to have a single take moment in a trailer, as I’m sure there are people that want to see more of the man himself, but the man who is talking to Johnny clearly defines what it is that Cash’s music was all about. The moment is perfectly captured and it’s at that point where the gates open and Phoenix lets loose.

There’s such a muted wickedness about Phoenix that it seems so right that a dude who I couldn’t have cared less for as a dramatic actor, sure I dug the crap out of him in SIGNS but that ostentatious performance in GLADIATOR was uncalled for, really strikes a chord deep inside me, no pun intended.

I do have to say, though, that the one thing that is steering this rolling train down the tracks is none other than Reese Witherspoon herself. Yeah, I know directors love her because she is so cool and teh awesome and there’s a female contingent that will see her come and crap on a phone book if that’s what her next performance is but I didn’t appreciate her distractions. She is and everyone here knows it so feel safe in echoing that when you see this trailer unfold.

I do like everything about the weight that Phoenix gives this performance. If I was a betting man, and I am but I just don’t have the means, I would have to say this trailer is right on par with the one crafted for RAY last year. There are thematic elements which pop up in both of them but what I really like about this trailer is that, just like in the RAY trailer, the music that plays in the background jingles at just the right rate.

Every angle and facet shown of Cash, in this trailer, just sings with emotion. Phoenix is undeniably slick in the black that made Johnny an original but I just hope he can channel the spirit of what made him the most dangerous man to hold a guitar who ever walked a line.


BEE SEASON (2005) Director: Scott McGahee, David Siegel
Cast: Richard Gere, Juliette Binoche, Kate Bosworth, Flora Cross, Max Minghella
Release: November 11, 2005 (limited)
Synopsis: Eliza Naumann (Flora Cross) has no reason to believe she is anything but ordinary. Her father Saul (Richard Gere), a beloved university professor, dotes on her talented elder brother Aaron (Max Minghella). Her scientist mother, Miriam (Juliette Binoche), seems consumed by her career. When a spelling bee threatens to reaffirm her mediocrity, Eliza amazes everyone: she wins. Her newfound gift garners an invitation not only to the national competition, but an entrée into the world of words and Jewish mysticism that have so long captivated her father’s imagination. But Eliza’s unexpected success hurls the Naumann family dynamic into a tailspin, long-held secrets emerge and she is forced to depend upon her own divination to hold the family together. BEE SEASON is based on the nationally best selling Myla Goldberg novel of the same name.
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Artificially Sweetened. Can anyone tell me if I am wrong if said that for every spelling bee that the newspapers print the entire list of possible words before the competition ever happens and that it’s really a matter of memorization than it is a kid’s inspired knowledge of Latin roots and meanings?

We’ll just assume for the benefit of this trailer that this little girl who’s teh cool speller is really a progeny, ‘kay?

So, Richard Gere seems to be taking the pole position in the family as the one who is really taking this whole spelling thing as a talent that needs intense nurturing. If I could point out one glaring fact about this family, though, is that they’re all great-looking people. I figure you would want to work the whole commonality angle but I’m not the one footing the bill so forget what I think about anything.

All photogenics aside, although their beauty wattage is hard to look away from, it’s like a beacon of hawtness which demands your attention, this family seems really effed up.

You’ve got the one son in the family doing a voiceover, and they’re really trying to make it dramatic here, folks, with the suicidal/emo guitar plucker in the background sounding all ready to blow his head clean off his shoulders, as the kid tries to define a word for the young spelling prodigy. It’s all very innocuous before Juliette gets involved and tells Richard, after he slights his man child for being a dumbass, essentially, he’s a bully.

This is not Family Ties I guess.

Even though I knew it was coming, I get it sooner than expected: The man child pulls a bombast on us and berates his green corduroy jacket wearing father inside the house. There are some tears being held back and there is most defiantly the promise of a physical altercation. All we get to see, though, is Richard turning in a dramatic twist of his Oh-I-Am-An-Ass-Aren’t-I neck.

There is a sweet visual, though, that I am going to give credit for which follows soon after. The spelling prodigy of the house does her own voiceover and explains her talent for being able to spell out words. There is a real HONEY, I SHRUNK THE KIDS close-up of a pencil scrawling over a piece of lined paper, I have real crappy handwriting myself, and the camera gets closer and closer. All of a sudden you see the graphite shifting like it was being shook in an Etch-A-Sketch and you can eventually make out that it is a big alphabet soup with letters sliding and diving everywhere. The child still talks about how she does what she does when we see a close up of her at a spelling function. Letters dance and bob around her head. It really is deserving of a golf clap.

Here’s where things get a little manipulative.

The emo man’s voice goes away as Richard has his own Voiceover. He talks about making the world a better place, blah, blah, blech. And as he talks about peace, love and Free Tibet beads we get the montage of a whole slew of images which are only designed to make your chick who cries at that one Maxwell House Christmas commercial when Peter comes home, you all know which one I’m talking about, to grab you by the nads and say, “We are so going to see that show.” You get Juiliette bawling her nuts off, Richard is obviously the Earl Woods of the family with regard to his little girl, the girl herself is being hoisted up for winning something or another and you even get Richard crying like a little bitch too. Geez, people, there is way too much bawling going on in the movies.

Oh, and I downloaded the song that plays in the trailer. It’s called “I’ll Be With You” by a band called Matter. I absolutely hate myself for it but I figure when I need to let loose for a good weep I’ll know help is as close as my iPod. It’s wicked good for a quick pop fix but it’s like slamming 8 lime Pixie Stix: it’s good for the first minute or so but then you regret for having done it like last Saturday night’s slump buster or maybe that’s just me.


TWO FOR THE MONEY (2005) Director: D.J. Caruso
Cast: Al Pacino, Matthew McConaughey, Rene Russo, Jeremy Piven, Armand Assante
Release: October 7, 2005
Synopsis: TWO FOR THE MONEY is a drama of high stakes set in the adrenalized world of wheeler-dealers whose fortunes are won and lost betting on sports. Matthew McConaughey stars as Brandon Lane, a former college football star whose uncanny ability to predict the outcome of a game introduces him to an unexpected new career when his gridiron glory is sidelined by a crushing injury.
Brandon’s talent makes him a prime candidate for recruitment by Walter Abraham (Pacino), the head of one of the biggest sports consulting operations in the country. Walter hires the small town ex-athlete and grooms him into a shrewd front man. Brandon soon begins to enjoy his status as a Manhattan golden boy and finds himself growing comfortable with Walter’s high-rolling lifestyle. The surrogate father/surrogate son relationship fattens Walter’s business and personal accounts…until Brandon’s golden touch begins to falter at the same time that Walter’s manipulation of his protégé crosses the line. With millions of dollars on the line, Brandon and Walter engage in a deadly game of con versus con, each one trying to maintain the upper hand while everyone in their world, including Walter’s wife, Toni (Russo), are drawn into the escalating duel-where ultimately everything isn’t what it appears to be.

View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Hilarious. You almost got me. Almost. I was inches away from really being excited about this movie and then, as I watched the trailer roll on, I saw that not even Matthew McConaughey’s electric whiteness, nee His Teeth, could save this one.

Yeah, I liked BOILER ROOM. I still go back to it as one of those character profiles which really captured one of those kinds of professions whose legitimacy borders on illegal. This seems to be the same kind of flick but without the Vin Diesel or Ben Affleck edginess.

The trailer starts like a shot of electrolytes to a thirsty man’s belly. It really gets you going. You’ve got a drum beat just thrusting your pulse forward, think of the into to Disturbed’s “Down With The Sickness,” and you’ve also got the same kind of grey, washed-out cinematography which really gives you a sense of place. Matthew’s one of those guys you see on Saturday mornings, usually on USA or one of your local channels who promise you the best line on sports bets, usually college or pro football, for one $25 call.

Matt does it and he’s good at it.

The trailer is great at capturing the thrill of the bet, the reality of how this profession still exists without being under the purview of government officials. Matt looks all dingy and dirty, the obvious set-up is that he’ll be transformed by the malevolent force being embodied by Al Pacino, but he’s good at what he does and the “Inspired by a True Story” even gets a greater buy-in from me.

It downturns, though, when the inevitable occurs, he moves on up to the East Side to a penthouse apartment in the sky. Pacino chimes in, turns our ruffian into a slick snake, takes over the voice-over duties, making it sound like he’s taking Matthew under his wing to make him a big star in a business that doesn’t have starts but annoying loud-mouths, and I and further frustrated when Renee Russo butts in for no good reason at all.

I am delighted, though, by the appearance of Jeremy Piven, his role, it seems, like a rehash of his Ari character from Entourage, as he scoffs at Matt’s new place as one of “them.”

What’s curious to state about this trailer is that we’re shown this man’s downfall. We’re actually privy to his meltdown as a sports speculator and, for the life of me, can’t understand why I should even care about this dude’s rise and fall. Just like in BOIILER ROOM we get the call from the one guy who put all his speculatatory eggs in one basket, loses it all, and then calls to whine about it and we even get Matt’s eventual Nietzschian, philosophical questioning of the direction in which his life is headed.

Good. You know what? That’s why they call it gambling, ‘Tard.

September 16, 2005

Trailer Park: WHO? NEVER HEARD OF HIM…

Filed under: Interviews,Trailer Park — admin @ 7:42 pm

E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES By Christopher Stipp

September 16, 2005

WHO? NEVER HEARD OF HIM…

There is always something unique about every interview and the real trick, the real skill, is finding that one thing which really defines the subject you talked to. As an interviewer I am constantly in a state of anomie, discontent, if you will, about what the angle really is going to be. The worst is finding out that the person you talked to doesn’t have any angle at all, that they’re just as shallow as you expect all those blessed with fame to be. Since I was a damn near an hour late for the interview I think I was worried that a) if they were any regular person at all they would have already left and b) whoever designed the 405 Freeway and the streets of Beverly Hills need to have their ankles hobbled by Kathy Bates a la Stephen King’s MISERY; in my defense, there is none I can offer. I had never before experienced the kind of sinister traffic in my life as I did in LA a few weeks ago on my way from LAX to The Beverly Hills Hotel at midday. What I found out, though, as I chewed my bottom lip to a stump, was that Julian Morris, star of CRY_WOLF, waited for me. He patiently waited for me to arrive so we could have our interview.

When I did make my way to the lusciously green patio area, Julian donning an endearing smile and completely accepting of my apologies, I couldn’t help but be taken in by his tractor beam of enthusiasm. Julian is new to audiences but he never once showed, talked or hinted about what his starring role means to him in terms of American acceptance of his acting abilities. Not that I don’t think he isn’t concerned about whether or not the movie will do well, I believe he is, but his thoughts and eagerness about his debut was more focused on the periphery: the director he worked with, his feelings about growing up in the theater, what he thought of the writing, etc”¦ I realize it’s not much to take away from someone trying to promote a movie and the back and forth banter between the two of us is only really revealed in a two-dimensional way but Julian is a happy guy. He’s genuine about where his career is going. There are things he really believes in when it comes to this movie but, most of all, the guy waited for me when not even my wife would’ve put up with that kind of tardiness.

One other thing, though, about Julian that I had to ask myself before getting into the interview with him was: How do you prepare for an interview when there isn’t anything written about him? It was honestly like a blind date. I had but cursory information to work off of, finding out that he’s been working a long time in his native England, but I had a greater need to find out why CRY_WOLF was flying so far under the media radar. At first I honestly believed it had to do something with Jon Bon Jovi being in the picture. Besides YOUNG GUNS when he donned those tight leather chaps and that weird necklace thing the only way I’ve heard about this movie was when I caught a mention of it when I saw an interview with that Aqua Net king. Other than that, there was nothing. There really isn’t anything of note I can see, even now, on the Internet besides some well-placed ads embedded into Web Pages but Julian does a serviceable job with giving enough incentive to see the movie just based on the way he talks about the film. Never mind the fact that Doug Liman, of BOURNE and GO fame, had a persuasive hand in CRY_WOLF’s development as Julian talked about how Liman had an involvement in this movie’s daily progression but it’s really Morris’ passion about what he does, trumping the blasé way in which stars his age treat the lottery ticket on life they’ve been given, that really makes you feel that this is an actor who needs to work more often in Hollywood if for no other reason than he has talent and an attitude towards his profession which makes me wish others in this line of work had the same gravitas about the tenuous grasp every actor has over the likes and dislikes of an ever fickle audience.

When I finally sit down, lay out a few mea culpas at his feet, asking for absolution, he looks down at my right hand and sees that I’m wearing my Claddagh ring.

Are you Irish?

Yes. The funny thing is that when I got this I was in Ireland. I stayed the week after at a B&B in London, right across the street from Buckingham Palace; it was the Queen’s Jubilee. We stayed with this woman who also commented about my ring and I said that’s where I got it and then commented about whether or not she’d been to Ireland. She basically turned up her nose and said, “Oh no!” Is Ireland like Britain’s Mexico?

(Laughs) No, No way.

There’s a historial antonogism but it’s nothing like that. That’s crazy. I love Ireland. I’m desperate to go. I’ve got a lot of Irish friends at school and they wear the rings.

Let’s talk about you. When I went to do my research on you and your past I found nothing. No outlet I went to was of any help to give me some background on where you’ve come from. From England to America to the big screen how did it happen?

Well, I’ve been working in England since I was young. When I was twelve I did this thing called “The Knock, “ a great miniseries, it dealt with the drug trade and after that I began with the Royal Shakespeare Company, like as an apprentice, at the age of 13 until I left school at seventeen. It was the most incredible learning ground working with the icons, my heroes, of English acting. I never saw acting as a career, it’s something I love, but I sat with this agent once for 15 minutes and I had it all planned.

I was going to Zimbabwe and work with animals because it’s something I like to do and after university he was to give me advice. If I wanted to continue to work in acting what should I do? We talked and talked and talked and after an hour and a half he said, “I want to represent you now.” He was like a big agent in London and I was like, “Yeah, cool, man.”

Since then which was 2000 it’s been crazy. I went to Africa to do this one job and six months after I signed with him I got the lead in this NBC pilot called Young Arthur. It was cast in Australia, Canada, the US, obviously, and they just plucked me out from this little place in England. I went to Prague to film it, playing the lead, I played Arthur. It was this amazing, incredible experience. It was never picked up but through that I got some great representation. Great manager, great agent and then I did WHIRLYGIRL which was incredible and now CRY_WOLF.

The director for the movie is fresh on the scene too.

Yeah, the man’s got an amazing family background. His aunt is Katie Couric and his mom’s the late Virginia senator, Emily Couric, and he’s an amazingly gifted director and his partner, Beau Bauman, they wrote this incredible script together. They won a competition at the million dollar Chrysler Film Festival. It was always a studio movie, this project, CRY WOLF, and it’s a million dollar movie. The studio figured that it could put it on the shelf and that “If it’s any good we’ll release it,” put it on DVD, but as a result for what was going on they gave a lot of leeway to the creative team behind it, Jeff and Beau, and they came up with this incredible film. The studio saw it and they said, “This is so, so good,” pumped in more money and now it’s going to be on a 1,000 screens as a major release in September.

This being your first major picture in the States do you feel any pressure from people who may think that, “This better do well”¦”?

I don’t. Maybe the producer does. I just hope people enjoy it. I just loved doing it and I honestly think it’s a great film. It’s terrifying, clever, it doesn’t speak down to the audience. The director was a clever guy, so was the writer and the producer and that was the way they approached it. They wanted to write this for a clever audience. The ending has a triple twist and by the end you’re just feeling like”¦I’m just proud of it.

This seems to be happening a lot lately in movies, horror films, suspense films, are making a resurgence. LAND OF THE DEAD, DAWN OF THE DEAD, horror movies are coming back.

I think that one of the great things about CRY_WOLF is that the director, Jeff, is a horror/sci-fi buff. It’s his thing, he loves it. And one of the things he’s done is that he’s taken this movie back to the roots of horror: the classical bad person, the horror is very real and it’s not comedic, the killer is not comedic. This not like a SCREAM movie. I think that if you look at the progression, the evolution of the horror film, you can see how Freddy from NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET, Jason from FRIDAY THE 13th series, became more and more comedic. Up until the 90’s it was this deconstructionist kind of genre but this movie brings it back to the roots and it’s going to refresh audiences to see that the fear is real, it’s palpatible. It’s there, it builds and it leaves you terrified and in the end, like I say, it’s a knock out.

What did you grow up on, horror wise, when you were young?

I remember the first movie I ever saw was JAWS. I was young. I must have been seven. It was on TV, I was shit scared as I was by myself and you get off on that. It’s a fun feeling, it grabs you. I remember once, Stephen King’s IT, I was young when I saw that. It’s just a great feeling to have something play with your emotions. I’m an actor so I love emotions so I love playing with them. You came into acting early, acting on the stage at a young age”¦

Yeah, Yeah”¦ Obviously everyone says “I love to do them both” but what are some of the advantages/disadvantages of being a screen actor versus a stage actor?

I don’t think there’s any disadvantage to either, as you’re working and getting paid”¦(laughs) Theater is great, you’re with an audience, it’s electric, you get an immediate response, the character arc is very clear because you have a beginning, middle and an end but in film it’s all about capturing moments. Like you’ll be there off-camera and everyone’s preparing lighting and then you’ll maybe do like five seconds worth of scene but you just want to get that moment. And you may do 15 takes to get that moment and I love that about film. It’s almost a perfectionist medium. It’s something you can just grab and get that moment of happiness or whatever it is but it’s a lot harder to get because it’s not like it’s A to B, a direct path, there are intervals where you’re waiting for the lighting to be set up or other things, it’s a process, but you can be a lot more subtle with film. You could sigh and the camera would get that where in the theater you couldn’t.

I like that a performance can be immortalized in film, that emotions can be immortalized in film. It’s always going to be there versus theater where it’s transient because one night will go one way and then it could be completely different, which is great, but it’s different.

With theater you’re putting out an emotion, bouncing it back off an audience, which is great but it can be dangerous because sometimes I think the biggest thing for an actor not to do in theater is that you want to perform or you want to make them laugh but you want to hear them react and you end up steering off from the truth to the character depending on what’s happening.

How do you sustain that? You say that acting in front of an audience is a constant process of being aware of what’s happening but in a movie you don’t get that.

Yeah, it’s good. In acting you’re always feeding off your other actors because I think it’s a bad idea to ever feed off the audience. To do that you’re not being truthful to the part, you’re only being true to an audience’s expectations. In film how you stay true to the lines is that you’ve got the director and his vision and so every day I’d go to his trailer and say this is the scene we’re doing, this is what it is. Obviously, you’ve also got your script and you’ve had time to think about the progression of your character and how you want them to grow. You’ve got an idea of where they’ve come from and what you’d like to do with them.

You stay true to the material, I guess.

Jon Bon Jovi is in this.

(Laughs) Yeah, he is.

Did you have to refer to him as Mr. Jovi?

We called him the Jove. It was crazy because he’s an icon, man.

The thing was that I was so excited to work with him and his teeth.

(I laugh)

I don’t know if you’ve ever seen pictures but he’s got these incredibly shiny, blistering, white teeth, It’s like burning magnesium. And on the first day I met him I got a tap on my shoulder and turned around and I swear to you it was like a blinding white light. I was listening to my iPod and I had on some classical music and I thought I was looking into the face of God or Jesus or Moses. (Laughs)

And when my vision cleared it was Jon Bon Jovi.

And he was good to work with? I know he’s tradionally known as a rocker and he has made some inroads into the filmic community”¦

He’s so down to earth. We had this drama coach on set at all time and he had his own coach. He took this very seriously and he’s good at it. He’s really good in this movie. So, he didn’t bring any scarf covered microphone stands or wear strategically ripped jeans on the set or bring out a guitar and just start singing?

No, but that’s funny because we were filming on campus and some people were like, “It’s Jon Bon Jovi” as we were trying to keep it under wraps and one afternoon he’s like, “Do you want to go out to lunch?” I was like, “Yeah, it’s Jon Bon Jovi”¦” and I was expecting a restaurant but it was even better than that. We went to the school canteen. And as soon as we entered it was crazy. It was amazing to see the kind of response he gets. Julian, thank you very much for your time.

No problem, thank you.

CRY_WOLF opens today.


DOOM (2005) Director: Andrzej Bartkowiak
Cast: Karl Urban, The Rock
Release: October 21, 2005
Synopsis: Something has gone wrong at a remote scientific research station on Mars. All research has ceased. Communication has failed. And the messages that do get through are less than comforting. It’s a level 5 quarantine and the only souls allowed in or out are the Rapid Response Tactical Squad – hardened Space Marines armed to the teeth with enough firepower to neutralize the enemy… or so they think.
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Could Go Either Way On This One. Is The Rock really the next SchwarzeIhategaypeoplenegger?

I would posit that Dwayne Wayne actually has a little bit more to offer the people. His performances in THE MUMMY RETURNS and THE SCORPION KING not withstanding are the things that made me a Jean-Claude Van Damme fan in the late 80’s: You know what you’re getting when you see him but he’s offering a little more talent to the project.

This trailer, though, leaves me wanting and I am not sure what it is. I am uplifted, though, by the effort put into making this trailer. You’ve got a great dissolve of the Universal logo, I’ve always been a fan of this kind of creativity, which situates us on Mars. Throaty Voiceover Guy actually helps to ratchet the tension as we’re told that scientists have just mapped the other 10% of the human genome. The pictures and graphics are quicker than anything, perfect for the audience you’re trying to grab by the nuts, but when you see some dude flailing around on an operating table, I haven’t a friggin’ idea of what that had to do with finding the other 10% of the genome, you know some dirty crap is going down.

Now, I have the game at home. I see it right here on my desk: Doom 3. Is all of the craziness which ends up ensuing the result of genetic tampering? I’m not much for details but it’s a little murky in this trailer how one has to do with the other. Ultimately it doesn’t make much difference, you never want to over think these kinds of plots, but it’s still cool to see people being attacked by mutants. That kind of stuff never gets old. Never.

Next we get The Rock listening to his marching orders via desktop computer and he’s not wearing a shirt. Now, I don’t want to get into the whole embedded subtext of what a shirtless Rock means to a population of young men who are the demographic target but all I’m saying is that he’s shirtless and this is the first time we’re seeing him.

One other thing, and I have to make a comment because it came up twice, is that there are some noticeable elements from other films in here. Someone swiped the sound the Predator makes as it is stalking its prey, this happens right before the bare-chested Rock scene and then, when The Rock is getting ready to kill the thing, and his team are all getting their weapons loaded and looking very Action Movie-ish the guns are straight from ALIENS. They are the same damn guns with the accompanying LED readout of how many shots are left in the gun. I’m not sure if this is homage or hack-age.

Now, once you move past Rock’s bombast speech about how they’re going in hot and that they’re going to have to kill anything that moves, all the while Rock looks very sweaty and serious, I am floored by the creative use of the first person angle this movie is going for. Just like in the game you’re looking straight down the end of a weapon, it bobbing up and down, when a mutant appears. Cut-away. Wicked cool. I am sure this nets quite a response from the nerd contingent.

Everything about this way of presenting the film just crackles with entertainment value. You’ve got a filmmaker who is trying to show that he “gets it” while everyone else just plays along with how the story is supposed to go. I am very impressed by the way the action sequences are laid down under the poseur metal music in the background. The dialogue, as well, is really bad but there is some real reverence for what seems to be a great action movie.

Two thumbs up, as well, for the chainsaw ending. Nice.


PROOF (2005) Director: John Madden
Cast: Gwyneth Paltrow, Anthony Hopkins, Hope Davis, Jake Gyllenhaal
Release: September 16, 2005
Synopsis: Based on the Pulitzer Prize-winning play by David Auburn, PROOF follows a devoted daughter (Paltrow) who comes to terms with the death of her father (Hopkins) a brilliant mathematician whose genius was crippled by mental insanity — and is forced to face her own long-harbored fears and emotions. She adjusts to his death with the help of one of her father’s former mathematical students (Gyllenhaal) who searches through her father’s notebooks in the hope of discovering a bit of his old brilliance. While coming to terms with the possibility that his genius, which she has inherited, may come at a painful price, her estranged sister (Davis) arrives to help settle their father’s affairs. PROOF is a haunting tale of the fragility of life and love that explores life’s complex equations.
View Trailer:
* Medium (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Negative. I’m honestly hopeful that there will come a movie where Gwyneth Paltrow will shine again like she did in THE ROYAL TENNENBAUMS. I thought she was actually good in that movie but I can’t think of anything else in recent memory where she’s reached another plateau, craft-wise, of that kind.

I know she loves to invoke that Madonna, I-wanna-be-a-British-courtesan, affectation in her acting whenever possible but this seems like it is a softball waiting to be punched right out of the park for the viewing public but instead we get more of what I foresee as Gwyneth’s continued slide into the Meg Ryan Syndrome, uncontrollable crying at a mea/median rate greater than any of her peers.

Anthony Hopkins starts things off with talking about crazy people. I like that he’s playing one of those men who are losing their minds but Gwyneth being the sole caretaker immediately strikes fear into me as I see her role being akin to that of Meg Ryan in HANGING UP. At this point I’m already worried.

We get the line pimped to us that this movie is coming to us from the Academy Award (All Rights Reserved, Copyrighted, Copy-Protected, Licensed, Bonded and Insured) director of SHAKESPEARE IN LOVE as a delicate, twinkling musical sonata wafts us into the crux of our picture: she’s had to live alone, I don’t see a mother anywhere, with a brilliant mathematician who has some issues when it comes to parenting. Already the lights and whistles are going off, and as well as they should, and when ol’ Gwyn finds pops outside in the snow we know he’s damn near lost his mind.

“I’m prepared to look at every page”¦”

Jake Gyllenhaal comes in as the, er, uh, I dunno what he is but this boy somehow insinuates himself into Gwyn’s life and home. He knows that her crazy dad wrote in a 100+ notebooks and wants to go through her pops’ life work. She already has a distressed look about her and I don’t know if she’s going to hold up through this trailer without crying. Frankly, I’m concerned. Jake is doing his best as the fanatical fan of her dad and tries to do everything in his power to release the power of her dad’s legacy unto the world.

Gwyn says no to any examination into her dad’s life but, like all good things Hollywood, we know her dike can’t hold back the loving advances of Jake’s smooth groove. I know this because no more, literally, than a few seconds after her protestations Jake is tearing through the halls of some college as his voiceover says something about him discovering a sumthin’ or another that the world needs to know about. It’s all very impassionate.

Gwyn, of course, gets all bothered by the idea that her dad wrote something so important, so much so that she skirts the line of a tearful breakdown, but Jake doesn’t want to hear any of her bull crap. Jake knows what’s up because he is the only one not getting hysterical over everything.

Some woman comes over to this crazy filled house where Gwyn lives and asks if she’d like some people to come over. Now, I don’t know if it’s a mother or a sister but I can see it, I can God honest see it, she’s been bawling. I don’t have any proof but she’s all paranoid that people will associate crazy person with her, as if dementia is a disease you can catch like herpes, not that I would know the exact vehicles or avenues of transmission of that STD per se, but she’s obviously conflicted.

This mystery woman keeps at Gwyn, stating that Gwyn has the same instabilities and tendencies like her father, thus really throwing her over the emotional deep end. She tosses shit around, dramatically, in true actress fashion, throwing a stack of SEVEN style notebooks off a desk and that’s when it happens: she’s bawling. She breaks down, in the open, to Jake who, if he’s really my boy, will capitalize on her vulnerability and seduce that.

It does look like he’s not going to let me down as he’s all about the craziness himself, really getting into this whole notebook thing, but not so much where he can’t expend a little of that energy getting Gwyn to the bedroom. I’d high-five that man if I could.

September 9, 2005

Trailer Park: FACTS AND FIGURINES

Filed under: Trailer Park — admin @ 7:41 pm

E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES By Christopher Stipp

September 9, 2005

FACTS AND FIGURINES

One of the things I don’t like about media hype is mis- or disinformation.

It’s one thing for marketing departments or web sites to tell the world that everyone is clamoring to catch Rob Schneider in DEUCE BIGALOW: THE DEUCE THAT SHOULD’VE BEEN LEFT TO FERTILIZE as we, the informed consumers, know that Throaty Voiceover Guy can do all the chattering he wants but in the end we all can smell a Cleveland Steamer when it’s plopped right in front of us. To that I say “Great!” as we are all becoming less and less enchanted with the abilities of those in publicity departments to just put some lipstick on a pig and call it a prom date. We’re becoming savvier shoppers and that translates into all of us having finely tuned crap detectors that not even Mahoney from POLICE ACADEMY 3 would be able to get around. So, what in the hell does this mean to the body politik with regard to the state of movies today? This all means that you shouldn’t just believe the outlets which are blowing on the conch of doom with regard to movie attendance and cash receipts.

Yes, attendance is off from last year. Less people, according to the numbers, went to the theaters this summer than last summer. There is a marked difference between what theater chains brought in this summer in gross revenue versus last year’s figures. These statements are all substantiated if you look at the bottom line; there’s no question about it and I am not arguing with that. What I will take violent contention with, though, is that those same assholes who would love to have you believe people are definitely turning away from the theaters due to home video sales, people brining the experience into their living rooms with better surround sound systems or that the fat of the fattest of America, as we are the fattest homo sapiens walking the earth, are getting so big that their corpulent fingers can’t bear to turn the ignition key to go to the local Loews Cineplex or AMC or Magic Johnson Theater in LA to see a movie. You’re being fed half the story and every person is willing to eat it up without questioning it.

Do me a huge favor, and I hope you will because I said you were all very smart, and go here. Take the yearly gross revenue column for every year starting from 1980 and chart a graph for me. Tell me honestly, after seeing what comes into focus is, yup, uh-huh, that’s right, one healthy UPWARD curve for the last 25 years.

The bottom isn’t falling out, there isn’t a crisis of faith at the box office, yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus and there isn’t a damn thing to worry about besides that this year isn’t doing so well compared to last. The people who tell you otherwise are just not taking the time or effort into truly analyzing what really happened this year. Could it be it because people just didn’t find the fare appealing this summer? Does the fact that the studios have a finite number of “tent pole” pictures which come out in the summer and if an already fickle public doesn’t see the merit in more than a few that it could really skew the numbers? Hell yes this could be the case and you’d have to be a shill for the movie industry, smoking the pole of any new release which might come with the exchange for a set visit, to see it any other way.

WAR OF THE WORLDS? Raise your hand if you were one of the people who saw it. I did, heard it was real expensive too. Real expensive. I totally bought into it until Tim Robbins threw the picture into reverse as we were all doing a heady 65 down the filmic freeway and we were served an ending which appeared cobbled together with invisible tape and a pair of crossed fingers, hoping we would all buy into it. I didn’t and I made sure other people knew of my displeasure. I didn’t want to dissuade anyone from seeing it but I told them what I thought and I have to believe other people did as well.

BATMAN BEGINS? Awesome movie and it deserved every penny it made as it passed the 200 million dollar mark. Again, referencing the comments I made above, I communicated with other people about the film and, in turn, I am sure this resulted in its awesome take at the B.O.

What I could blather on aimlessly about is this very divergent idea: crap movies aren’t necessarily punished at the theater while good ones aren’t always rewarded with great takes. MURDERBALL was a wicked awesome documentary yet its pull wasn’t super. Who the hell cares? It will find its audience. These kinds of things usually do. But you’d never know that if you listened to the din emanating from Monday Morning Quarterbacks across the Web.

Before I go back into my grumpy hovel do me this one last favor. Look at all the movies which broke the 100 million dollar mark in 2004. For those too lazy I’ll give you the number: 24 of them. Now, look at all the movies which broke the 100 million dollar mark in 2005: 12. Now that you have these digits, subtract the number of those 24 films in 2004 which came out AFTER Septmeber. That figure is 11. See what’s coming into focus? We’re right on pace. 40 YEAR OLD VIRGIN just may make it an even playing ground. I admit it: I had to take College Algebra in order to satisfy my college graduation requirements. I may have graduated Magna Cum Laude but I am no mathematician; I am homogenously shitty at figuring out complex mathematical kinds of things. My field was Proust and Shakespeare. I invite anyone to make this a black and white issue for us all.

Look, it’s all about the manipulation of figures and how badly you want to believe that the sky is falling. There is always an element out there which wants their information to be believed for one reason or another in order to justify some kind of action. The movie mafia wants to blame home video sales? Fine. Want to blame people’s apathy in wanting to pack the car up? Fine. What’s not fine is that you have a lot of Chicken Littles running around screaming that the sky is falling when, in fact, the dip only reveals so much about what’s really happening.

If someone would like to write a paper on this I’d be happy to post it here for some people’s erudite pleasure. And here you were thinking you weren’t going to learn anything today. Pshaw”¦


JARHEAD (2005) Director: Sam Mendes
Cast: Jake Gyllenhaal, Peter Sarsgaard, Jamie Foxx, Lucas Black, Chris Cooper
Release: November 4th, 2005
Synopsis: When a young man joins the Marines and trains to be a sniper, he finds himself plunged into the chaotic swirl of sand, oil, fire and death that was the Gulf War. View Trailer:
* Medium (Windows Media)
Prognosis: Positive. I went out with this girl for a while, Tina Benitez, who adored Bobby McFerrin. Dug him enough to put his “music” on mix tapes she used to send me. I fucking could not stand “Don’t Worry Be Happy.” After it was appropriated by the Regan administration in the 80’s in much the same way “Don’t Stop” was taken over by Clinton both these songs now deserve to be heaped on the pyre of mediocrity, along with the evilness that Duncan Hines and the California Rasin Co-Op wrought with their abuse of the Four Tops.

However, I can look past all this luggage and baggage because any time you have a kid who is narrating his inner feelings about serving his country, and there’s an uneasiness that’s pasting and gelling it all together, you’ve got some good juxtaposition going. I appreciate that.

Even before we get the handle on what Jake Gyllenhaal is doing, preparing for, we get the ubiquitous Directed By card, glossing over his efforts on ROAD TO PERDITION, and going straight for that Oscar card with AMERICAN BEAUTY. Understandable considering the nebulous handle most people either had or didn’t have on PERDITION.

What gets me about this trailer, and how it slowly sucks you in, is that after they flash Jamie “Don’t Call Me Stealth” Foxx it’s Jake’s blind vacancy behind his eyes that gets me. He’s not quite Private Gomer Pile from FULL METAL JACKET but there’s uneasiness behind the anticipation in his face.

Chris Cooper, with his microphone tilted toward his face, the way he’s proselytizing and addressing a choir of hungry soldiers who are all willing to do thy bidding, shows us a flicker of greatness once more as he lays down the aims for the attack that’s about to happen. Cooper isn’t screwing around.

The soundtrack changes. It’s lyrical with a minimalist hip-hop beat pulsating underneath it as the images we’re getting, Jake popping a gum bubble as he mans a sniper rifle, a dude sleeping in a foxhole, a platoon marching with their gas masks on and the sweetest looking line of fighters, a good dozen of them, flying side-by-side with their exhaust lines trailing behind them, trigger curiosity but we don’t get much in the way of narration.

That’s fine, though.

We get more of the same as the trailer goes beyond its halfway mark. Jake dons a Santa hat sans shirt, guys are playing football in their gas masks, oil field flames shoot into the air like geysers and a humvee flips over from an explosion underneath it.

The trailer doesn’t see a need, the precious seconds bleeding away as more discordant images conflagrate to the point of confusion, to fill us in on what the hell this is all about. If we’re going by style alone, that’s fine, A+, but if I had to take any umbrage at all is that we’re not really “in on” what Jake’s role is. Is he an eager boy who turns into a man and then realizes he was eager for all the wrong reasons? Does he turn into a sadist who gives in to his animalistic rage and need for violence? The point is never resolved and I would hope we get a little more insight than this.

James Dean’s adolescent brooding and “dangerous” air went out when he did. I’ve got to identify with who I’m seeing but I got none of that here. The imagery, though, is worth the price of viewing.


CAPOTE (2005) Director: Bennett Miller
Cast: Philip Seymour Hoffman, Catherine Keener, Cliffton Collins Jr., Bruce Greenwood, Chris Cooper, Bob Balaban, Mark Pellegrino
Release: September 30, 2005 (limited)
Synopsis: On November 15, 1959, the brutal murder of a family in a small Kansas town sent shockwaves through the nation ““ and captured the attention of one of the most distinctive minds of our time. One-of-a-kind author Truman Capote was sent to Kansas to pen an article about the crimes for The New Yorker magazine. He ended up writing one of the most celebrated books of the century. CAPOTE follows Truman Capote (Hoffman) on his odyssey to create the landmark bestseller In Cold Blood. With signature style and mordant wit ““ and his friend Harper Lee (Keener) in tow ““ Capote attempts to charm the locals and work his way into the story behind the murders. He’s soon shocked, however, to find himself forming a friendship with one of the killers, Perry Smith (Collins). As the book nears completion and execution day approaches, Capote finds himself torn in directions he never anticipated and is forever changed by his experiences.
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Confused. Alright, peeps, this is your medicine for the week.

Yeah, it would be Hella Cool if I would’ve looked at the new DOOM trailer this week but you all can’t be living your life under a Technicolor, Dolby Digital, Hi-Fi surround sound rock. Broaden your horizons, as it were.

This has all the horizon you’ll need for a while.

What I like about the opening about this trailer is that even though there is something very quiet about a rural home in Kansas (I lived there for years and I can vouch that there ain’t jack crap going on within its suburbs) it’s very loud when you punctuate that scene, a very cold and blustery scene, with a flash of light and a gun blast. That gets your attention.

Cut to Seymour Hoffman. Tortured with a voice that would’ve made David Sedaris recognize there was probably someone else in this world who got their ass kicked more than he did, Seymour talks about wanting to write about the murders. There’s something that interests him about it. Before we know what really interests him about the story we are shoved into Seymour’s backstory. It’s wickedly brief and you can use the melodic cues to take you through it all.

On the one hand you have this jaunty beat which shows Seymour as the insider for New York’s affluent and aristocratic buffoons in a time when the notion of a social insider meant more than being a Page 6 leech but after the giggles and patronizing accolades are heaped upon Capote’s persona the music gets morose. Seymour is in Kansas, wearing a deliciously well woven scarf, in the middle of winter. We’re not really sure what he hopes to uncover and his laissez faire attitude regarding the crime doesn’t help establish his motives.

At one point in this trailer, after we’re on the hunt for some Midwestern kind of killers, we get Capote reflecting on how people have misjudged him for his entire life just because of the way he talked. True, he does have that kind of whiny, tinny voice that has never really before been harnessed by heterosexual male but that’s no excuse to be so down on yourself. Really, if I want to go to a pity party I would sooner go over to humanitarian Richard Simmons’ house so he can explain to me why he thinks he’s so misunderstood by a society because of his “eccentricities.” After getting this out of the man we’re graciously allowed back into the trailer’s action.

What follows seems pretty conventional just based on what I see in this trailer’s presentation. We have a dude who may or may not be guilty of the crime of murder and you have Capote who is like John Grisham’s wet dream, a man who will defy the odds to prove the man’s innocence, just by investigating the man’s life. It’s all very true to Hollywood form except here you have some black and white pictures of Capote and the would-be killer in some poses you would think they’re shooting for the J. Crew Fall 2005 calendar. It’s very strange.

Chris Cooper, bless his heart, looks like the beleaguered cop who has been on the case for years and has to endure the eccentricities of this fruit loop of a writer. It just looks like it’s taking everything Cooper has to not pistol whip the poor bastard into leaving town on the next Amtrak leaving Wichita, Kansas.

The end of this trailer has Cooper and Hoffman sharing a table, Cooper’s body language subtly showing us the phrase “Get me the hell away from this bastard before I dish out a little small town justice” in all its resplendent glory, and when Hoffman nearly whispers the title of his book the look on Cooper’s face is all but worth a 1,000 hand-typed words.


JUST LIKE HEAVEN (2005) Director: Mark Waters
Cast: Reese Witherspoon, Mark Ruffalo, Jon Heder, Dina Spybey, Ben Shenkman
Release: September 16th, 2005
Synopsis: When David (Mark Ruffalo) sublet his quaint San Francisco apartment, the last thing he expected – or wanted – was a roommate. He had only begun to make a complete mess of the place when a pretty young woman named Elizabeth (Reese Witherspoon) suddenly shows up, adamantly insisting the apartment is hers. David assumes there’s been a giant misunderstanding”¦until Elizabeth disappears as mysteriously as she appeared. Changing the locks does nothing to deter Elizabeth, who begins to appear and disappear at will – mostly to rebuke David for his personal living habits in her apartment. Convinced that she is a ghost, David tries to help Elizabeth cross over to the “other side.” But while Elizabeth has discovered she does have a distinctly ethereal quality – she can walk through walls – she is equally convinced that she is somehow still alive and isn’t crossing over anywhere. As Elizabeth and David search for the truth about who Elizabeth is and how she came to be in her present state, their relationship deepens into love. Unfortunately, they have very little time before their prospects for a future together permanently fade away.
View Trailer:
* Small (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Awful. Hi, I’m Mark Ruffalo and I was pretty good in that indie tear fest movie YOU CAN COUNT ON ME. Lucky for you I was also in ETERNAL SUNSHINE OF THE SPOTLESS MIND which I got to get my swerve on with Kirsten Dunst in my Fruit Of The Loom’s. You’re lucky because those movies don’t pay enough for me to pay the rent so I have little option but to star in movies like 13 GOING ON 30 and this new one JUST LIKE HEAVEN, big Hollywood marketing darlings which you middle America ladies seem to gobble up like chocolate pudding. I wish things could be different but I can’t see any other way to make sure my career keeps going.

Someone needs to give Mark a check just so he’ll stop appearing in these pre-packaged titter-fests which women love to drag their men to. If there was something redeeming about the filmic history of Reese Whitherspoon I’d love to share it here but since it’s nonexistent I can’t possibly be expected to do that. So far, and this is for those keeping score at home, I have been pulled into every movie that chick has done in the last 7 years because I have a wife who think she’s the bee’s knees and, by default, I’ve been to most every opening weekend of this chick’s flicks.

That’s why, in this movie, I am happy to report, with much glee, Reese is hit, head-on, by a truck and killed.

Let me repeat, she is hit, head-on, by a truck. If this scene could have been filmed at different angles I could actually see the point of watching 90 minutes of just this one moment.

Suffice to say, though, she doesn’t stay dead and that’s a big disappointment. She apparently is a hard working doctor, one commenting that she’s worked for 26 hours and needs to go home to rest her pretty blonde head, to which she keeps on keeping on. And that’s when she’s hit by a truck, head-on.

Cut to Mark Ruffalo who needs a place to live. He, apparently, chooses Reese’s old space and actually sees her after one of his showers. Again, things could be interesting if he was rubbing one out right before their meeting because that would honestly put a new twist in this dead person/live person/no one else can see them genre.

And what’s more about what is so crappy about this picture is that while the two of them are trying to coexist with one another, Reese not believing she’s dead, Mark trying to make sense of what he’s seeing and it all being very zany, who should appear but Jon “Napoleon Dynamite” Heder. He plays a supporting role in this crapfest and I can’t, for the life of me, begrudge the guy who obviously isn’t doing this movie for its great artistic merits but becuase he needs some face time with the American public and would also appreciate some spending money for the weekend.

Oh yeah, the tagline which says that this movie is from the same director of FREAKY FRIDAY and MEAN GIRLS? That should be like one of those Nazi P.O.W. prison camp sirens from Hogan’s Heroes, blaring into your subconscious that you should avoid this at all costs. But, here’s the twist, and this is really complex so I’ll break it down slow: when Mark decides to revisit all Reese’s old friends and colleagues and they all say how she was a workaholic, cold old maid, Reese ends up feeling really bad.

And, stab my eyes, the two of them start to like each other in a most intimate way. Now, even though there are some GHOST, ALL OF ME and DEFENDING YOUR LIFE elements going on in this movie it does not deter from the fact that the further you, your old lady or your quote-un-quote “roommate,” who is wacked out of their skull and thinks Reese is just like one of us from what they’ve seen in US Weekly, get into this trailer the more manipulative it gets.

In much the same way Quint rolled in his rod n’ reel with a crazed look in his eye when he snagged Jaws so too does this trailer play the sappy ass music, interjecting the sappy looks our two players give each other and the false emotion behind Reese’s hope that she wishes she wasn’t so dead, this trailer plays its Mysterio mindfuck trick on those sympathetic to these fake characters’ plight and this will only result in your significant, or insignificant, other drag you against your will into the theater.

This trailer, though, if I am going to be honest with all of you, is a great example of how you make a piece of advertising which does nothing more than try and snowball someone into seeing it. There isn’t one redeeming piece of story hidden behind the fluff but it does a great job in trying to persuade you that there is.


AEON FLUX (2005) Director: Karyn Kusama
Cast: Charlize Theron, Frances McDormand, Jonnie Lee Miller, Sophie Okonedo
Release: December 12, 2005
Synopsis: The film, based on the futuristic MTV animated series created by Peter Chung, is set 1,000 years in the future, when disease has wiped out the population save for one city. The acrobatic title character (Theron) is the top operative in an underground rebellion, but when sent on a mission to kill the government’s leader, she uncovers a secret making her question if she’s on the right side. McDormand will play the Handler, the leader of the rebellion.
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Negative. Raven haired. Can we get that out of the way first? It’s a very becoming look on any lady who wants to put on the affectation of Wednesday Addams. Now, we open onto a scene must like that of the WAR OF THE WORLDS. There are these towers which look like the bulbous heads of the alien invaders in Spielberg’s finale/brake fest and Charlize stands on the precipice of an adjoining structure. It’s up way high and I have no idea why she has a look of fear on her face if she was the one who went up there in the first place.

She rears back and runs off the ledge, looking like Trinity from the original MATRIX: RELOADED, the one that didn’t suck as bad as the other sequel, and she even gives us a wholly unnecessary somersault as she makes it to the other side of a very long space between buildings.

Soon after we are regaled with Charlize’s voiceover about this “last society” on Earth, of course, and how it’s supposed to be this utopia, of course, and how it’s anything but, of course. There are even rebels, who form an underground movement, who are trying to reassert control over the mentally asleep citizens. The imagery and the way she moves seems awfully like Denis Leary’s character in a similarly plotted movie: DEMOLITION MAN.

Now, the government seems to be stealing its citizens on the sly for reasons unknown. That’s why Charlize is on the case, right? We get a flash of skulls, almost too fast, to really throw it home that this is serious shit. They’re not kidding around with this kidnapping stuff.

Transpose onto that, if you will, the next set of visuals: Charlize walking around in some low-cut bikini briefs. What would you be more concerned with? Human life or trying like a Kit-Kat to break you piece off of that? I know where my concern is.

There’s a weird moment when we’re told that there are people who fight for the disappeared. We get some GQ looking dude, all in spandex black, who embraces some chick, also in spandex black, but she’s wearing an eye-less cowl, the exact same lame-ass outfit that Rex Smith, aka The Daredevil, wore in The Trial of the Incredible Hulk. It’s alarming to see it revisited here as is the French kiss which takes between them. The dude passes along some silver pill via his tongue, like this is some high school kegger, and we get up-close to look at the exchange. Why? I don’t know and really don’t care.

Charlize then lets us know that she too is a fighter for those persons who are snatched by the government and we are regaled with a display of her physical prowess. She beautifully kicks some well choreographed butt as we’re told she’s expertly trained and ruthlessly efficient. It’s a little tiresome as the set pieces seem a bit worn and played out.

What does interest me, though, even after recoiling in horror at the sight of Frances McDormand donning some of the most wicked bed head, crow’s nest hair I have ever laid eyes on, is that when Aeon is given the assignment of killing some person or something she stands on the top of this overly green hill. This hill looks straight at the lush grounds which lead to the spooky base of operations of whomever and Charlize takes off running toward the place only to see that the green grass is alive and it’s sharp. Little green needles bend towards Theron’s face as she quickly discovers this. The effects here are pretty nice but that’s about it.

We get NBC Daredevil circa 1989 again, one of those quick drum beats behind the visuals which is supposed to indicate extreme action of some sort and one of the oddest things I’ve ever seen in an action movie: Charlieze whistles like she’s calling Lassie, except here she’s calling a series of iron marbles, and they somehow, someway, assist her in the quest for goodness. It’s awful.

The ending quick shots are just as bad. The low quality execution of what should be pretty intense effects, the bad guy looking just like any conventional bad guy should, the zingers that Charlize throws out which should sound like bon-mots but end up sounding like pathetic one-liners and the way she tries to come off as this tougher than leather warrior just comes across as a pretty girl who is trying to play the part of the bad-ass.


THUMBSUCKER (2005) Director: Mike Mills
Cast: Tilda Swinton, Vince Vaughn, Vincent D’Onofrio, Keanu Reeves, Benjamin Bratt
Release: September 16, 2005
Synopsis: Justin throws himself and everyone around him into chaos when he attempts to break free from his addiction to his thumb.
View Trailer:
* Medium (Windows Media)

Prognosis: Positive. Big fan of NAPOLEON DYNAMITE.

Huge.

When I saw it I wasn’t quite sure what the hell I was viewing but after getting to the five minute mark, I got it.

That flick makes haters or lovers out of people and, judging by the numbers of people who are wearing Vote for Pedro shirts that they bought at Hot Topic, don’t worry if you’re one of them this is a place for healing, I’d say a lot of people got the vibe of the movie and that’s a good thing.

However, but not so much a “however” as it is an Exhibit A kind of lead-in, a movie that apes the handcraftiness of Napoleon’s artistic scribblings was bound to make its way here and I am happy to say that after one year of being out there, we have our movie and I feel accepting of the angle this marketing is going in.

I wasn’t expecting much but hot damn if I didn’t like this trailer. There’s some independent flavor that’s desperately being sought after and I’ll give the filmmakers that much. The cinematography creeps up on you as what sounds like the opening piano suite from Home Sweet Home by Motley Crue starts to play. It’s not but it just seems so close and apropos. We see our normal suburban stronghold of a house; static, no camera movement. Next we get to infer our protagonist has been living in said tenement with the pencil markings on the wall demarcating how he’s grown as a young child. Next, a crapload of trash falls from the top of the screen, its source nowhere to be found, and you’re left with the “Huh?” feeling as you’re yanked to Keanu’s voiceover. He’s talking to our young man who’s laid out on Dr. Reeve’s dental chair. They’re talking about the effects of thumb sucking and what it’s doing to our adolescent. Keanau gets all New Age with him. It’s amusing in quiet way.

Flash to a hand-drawn card telling us the name of the movie. I want to see a Liger pop out at me but I don’t get it.

What I do get, though, is a rocket ship ride which passes by lots of good information like:

A) Tilda Swinton is the kid’s mom.

B) Benjamin Bratt is a sensitive listener.

C) Vincent D’Onofrio is the kid’s dad.

D) Vince Vaughn plays a creepy teacher.

Solid cast and their parts are well fleshed-out for as little time as we’re given with them.

Our kid hero likes the ladies and if you’re one of those kind of dudes who like seeing young women in their skivvies head on over to this trailer and wait until the 50 second mark. Big payoff.

The music changes to some indie-emo rock, sounds like we moved from the Crue to Foo, Fighters that is, and over the beat of the tune that’s playing we see that little Johnny has ADD, hyperactivity disorder and a couple more behavioral maladies which are easily remedied with some medication. He’s shown taking the pills and, two seconds later, which in movie time really equates to two months, it’s like comic book continuity, he’s better.

“You see those girls out there?”

“Yeah.”

“Go round them up, bring them in here.”

“In the men’s room?”

“It’s okay, I’m a teacher, I’m a teacher.”

Vince Vaughn, while not your typical, amusing wisecrack ace of a guy, does have his part as a creepy educator down pat. I even laugh at the above exchange that Vince has with our once withdrawn teen that’s slowly coming out of his social skin.

There are some weird words between Keanu and our man shortly after the bathroom scene and things take a weird turn when the kid starts to discover things about himself which weren’t previously expressed before his indoctrination into the world of pharmaceuticals. He’s smart, intelligent and he is all about getting his swerve on with many a lady. Again, for those who like teenage girls in their skivvies, go to the 1 minute 50 second mark. I have no idea what its purpose is in the grand context besides giving those playing the home game a little thrill but I’m honestly more interested in the story and I don’t get that.

If there’s anything that leaves me cold is that I don’t really get to know why I should care about the protagonist here besides cheering for the fact that he looks well on his way to scoring some high school tail before the last reel of this movie has come to an end.

Powered by WordPress