Tag: Mickey Rourke

  • Trailer Park: IRON MAN 2

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    Check out my new column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

    Robin Hood – Free Passes

    robinhood_posterWho lives in Arizona and wants to see Russell Crowe dispatch dirty peasants with a bow and arrow?

    I sure do. After loving every last morsel of the last Russell Crowe/Ridley Scott team-up this film at least gets an emotional buy-in simply because lighting may very well strike twice.

    For those that would like to see this film Tuesday, May 11th, at 7:00 at Harkins Fashion Square please shoot me a line at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com and let me know you’re interested in winning some tickets. I don’t have many so get those entries in quick.

    And, for those that need an explanation of what this movie has in store for you, read the film’s description:

    Oscar winner Russell Crowe stars as the legendary figure known by generations as “Robin Hood,” whose exploits have endured in popular mythology and ignited the imagination of those who share his spirit of adventure and righteousness. In 13th century England, Robin and his band of marauders confront corruption in a local village and lead an uprising against the crown that will forever alter the balance of world power. And whether thief or hero, one man from humble beginnings will become an eternal symbol of freedom for his people.

    The untitled Robin Hood adventure chronicles the life of an expert archer, previously interested only in self-preservation, from his service in King Richard’s army against the French. Upon Richard’s death, Robin travels to Nottingham, a town suffering from the corruption of a despotic sheriff and crippling taxation, where he falls for the spirited widow Lady Marion (Oscar winner Cate Blanchett), a woman skeptical of the identity and motivations of this crusader from the forest. Hoping to earn the hand of Maid Marion and salvage the village, Robin assembles a gang whose lethal mercenary skills are matched only by its appetite for life. Together, they begin preying on the indulgent upper class to correct injustices under the sheriff.

    With their country weakened from decades of war, embattled from the ineffective rule of the new king and vulnerable to insurgencies from within and threats from afar, Robin and his men heed a call to ever greater adventure. This unlikeliest of heroes and his allies set off to protect their country from slipping into bloody civil war and return glory to England once more.

    Tokyo Sonata – DVD Review

    tokyosonata_3dSuch an endearing film, this movie from Kiyoshi Kurosawa explores some of the more quiet aspects of live in modern Japan.

    One of the funny things about Kurosawa is that most who do know his name know it from his work in the horror genre. A movie that departs greatly from that wheelhouse, Tokyo Sonata is an overlooked gem from last year that not only reaffirmed my own sense of what it means to be a family but that Kurosawa knows how to transcend cultural mores and tell a story about a man who loses his job and tries to hold on to the lie as kids, wife unravel before his eyes.

    It’s a bittersweet movie that is genuinely funny but it’s also an introspective film that is gorgeous to look at while seeing that there is some real pathos happening before you. The performances are uniformly excellent especially Kyoko Koizumi, who plays the put upon matriarch of the family, who becomes something of a force to reckon with as she evolves in this family that tries to pull through what is ostensibly the most difficult time in their lives.

    Do not miss what I wish I could have seen in the theaters, the lush cinematography showing the natural ebb and flow of life in Japan, and a movie that can speak to what modern families have to deal with in a time that knows no geographical or social boundaries.

    About the film:

    FROM INTERNATIONALLY-RENOWNED DIRECTOR KIYOSHI KUROSAWA COMES A “HAUNTING AND MASTERFUL” FILM, WINNER OF THE PRESTIGIOUS CANNES UN CERTAIN REGARD JURY PRIZE

    Best known in the United States for unsettling horror films like PULSE and CURE, internationally recognized director Kiyoshi Kurosawa ventures away from the genre with TOKYO SONATA. Probing the dark side of human nature and the social problems that confront contemporary Japan, this highly acclaimed 2009 theatrical release was awarded the Un Certain Regard Jury Prize at the 2009 Cannes Film Festival, as well as capturing Best Film and Best Screenwriter at the Asian Film Awards.

    Equal parts social commentary and situational comedy, the atmospheric TOKYO SONATA is a story of an ordinary Japanese family of four. The father, Ryuhei Sasaki, like any other Japanese businessman, is faithfully devoted to his work. His wife, Megumi, left on her own to manage the house, struggles to retain a bond with her oldest son in college, Takashi, and the youngest, Kenji, a sensitive boy in elementary school. From the exterior the family is seemingly normal, save for the tiny schisms that exist within. However, after Ryuhei unexpectedly loses his job, the quiet unraveling of the family beings.

    Facing completely unfamiliar circumstances, Ryuhei decides not to tell his family and begins his lonely sojourn into the world of the secretly unemployed. Along with many other businessmen who save face by concealing their shameful reality from family and friends, Ryuhei begins to depart each day for work, when, in fact, he kills time in libraries and parks. His lies and torment go unnoticed by Takashi, who becomes increasingly despondent and alienated from his family, and Megumi, who can no longer summon the will to keep her family together. And, the longer his charade goes on, the less control he has as patriarch, creating an even deeper divide between him and his family.

    TOKYO SONATA is presented in Japanese with English subtitles, and includes a “Making Of” Featurette, Cannes Festival Footage and Panel Interviews and Interviews with the Cast and Crew.

    California Dreamin’ – DVD Review

    califronia-dreamin_2d_hWhen I was in Ireland I picked up a book called “Turn Left at Greenland.”

    It was a book that talked about what America looks like through the eyes of a foreign news correspondent living and working within our borders. It was an odd thing, seeing our country from someone that doesn’t call this home but it’s perfectly apt in order to describe the feeling of watching this movie from filmmaker, and Romanian, Cristian Nemescu.

    The movie deals with a military intelligence officer, played with deft playfulness by Armand Assante, who finds himself stuck on the way to Kosovo in some faceless Romanian that could be any number of small hamlets in this part of the world, that has to navigate his way out of being held almost hostage in a farce that at once illuminates what we look like to others and how we deal with ourselves. The ugly American, uncouth around those who are simply living their own lives as we try and impose our will to fit our needs, is on full display here but the reason this movie excels masterfully is because how sly it is. It’s not enough to come right out and say what’s on this film’s mind, this movie plays with your expectations and lets the action on the screen tell the story.

    Is America the strong willed bully who likes to play the part of imperialist? If Nemescu’s movie is any indication it is but there are bright spots to be found within its stubbornness. Make no mistake about it, either. Nemescu skewers his own culture as well, pointing out that while we have our own problems no one is perfect by any stretch.

    It’s disappointing that this is Nemescu’s only film, he died in a car accident before being able to properly edit this film down before it made its bow at Cannes in 2007, but this is a gem of a movie that talks global politics that still have meaning today in an age when this film explains so much about our involvement inside Pakistan and Iraq.

    About the film:

    THE AWARD-WINNING ““ AND ONLY ““ FILM FROM ONE OF THE WORLD’S GREAT YOUNG DIRECTORS, WHO DIED BEFORE ITS RELEASE

    In the tradition of great black comedies about war ““ from Dr. Strangelove and M*A*S*H to Three Kings and In the Loop ““ comes CALIFORNIA DREAMIN’, one of the masterpieces of what’s been called the Romanian new wave. This vital and globally honored movie was the only feature film from brilliant young director Cristian Nemescu.

    The fact-based story proves that truth is stranger ““ and more absurd ““ than fiction. It’s 1999, and the bloody civil war in Yugoslavia is underway. A platoon of American Marines has arrived in Constanta , Romania , with a shipment of military radar meant to be deployed near the Serbian border in support of NATO air raids. No-nonsense Captain Doug Jones (Golden Globe winner Armand Assante in a career performance) is in charge of transporting the equipment by train across Romania , but when the train is stopped in a remote village, Jones and his men must contend with the corrupt and terrifying stationmaster, Doiaru (Razvan Vasilescu), who’s also the local strongman and black market operator. The Marines become the “guests” of a poor village filled with frustrating bureaucracy, sexy young women on the make, and odd pop culture celebrations. Can Americans really bring order and hope to this chaotic part of the world, or is that just California dreamin’?

    Five Minutes of Heaven – DVD Review

    fmoh_3d_lThis is a movie that you ought to seek out and enjoy for the high level of screenwriting and visual flair for cinematography.

    A movie about two men, James Nesbitt and Liam Neeson, Catholic and Protestant respectively, who both had a part in the fighting that took place in the mid-1970s as these two religious groups fought a bloody war of politics and religion. All grown up, they are being chauffeured for a face-to-face, televised meeting. The real draw of the film, then, is how these two men find themselves here as they reflect on the events of their youth.

    Filled with murder and rage, both men have their own sins to atone for but Oliver Hirschbiegel, director of the indescribably good Downfall, looks at these two people not to be pitied but to be understood. Screenwriter Guy Hibbert’s script is filled with moments that let you know this is a writer’s film, not a movie based on the quick cuts and violence you would expect out of a Tom Clancy novel if it were to be written about this chance meeting.

    The rage that still simmers beneath the thin veneer of older age is deliciously depicted and honestly makes the case as to why there is some pain that will never be sated until revenge is exacted. But the movie is so much more than revenge fantasies and recompense, it’s a movie that should leave you thinking about how our own conflicts, no matter how personal they may be, can find a way to be exercised. I found my palms sweaty more than once and it’s due to a movie that wants to personalize, not dehumanize, it’s characters.

    Seek this film out if a jangling Irish accent and the allure of a movie that wants to take its time with you is something you desire. Revenge is a dish best served cold but what happens after it’s on the table? This movie tells you exactly what happens.

    About the film:

    IN A PLACE WHERE BLOODY CONFLICT IS ALL MANY PEOPLE HAVE EVER KNOWN, SOME WOUNDS MAY PROVE TOO DEEP FOR TIME TO HEAL

    Liam Neeson Stars in the Latest Triumph From Oscar® Nominee Oliver Hirschbiegel.

    “The past is not dead. In fact, it isn’t even past.” The famous line from Faulkner could serve to describe FIVE MINUTES OF HEAVEN, the acclaimed suspenseful thriller about the long-lasting pain caused by the Troubles in Northern Ireland . That violent conflict has been the basis for many memorable movies, but few as gripping as Oscar-nominated director Oliver Hirschbiegel’s film, which features career performances by international stars Liam Neeson and James Nesbitt.

    FIVE MINUTES OF HEAVEN is based on true events. It’s 1975 and conflict has been underway for years between the predominantly Catholic nationalists who want to end British control of Northern Ireland and the predominantly Protestant loyalists. Alistair Little, a 16-year-old Protestant member of the Ulster Volunteer Force, is anxious to earn his stripes and, along with his group, is given the go-ahead to kill an Ulster Catholic as reprisal for IRA attacks. Their target is 19-year-old Jim Griffen. The murder is witnessed by Griffen’s 11-year-old brother Joe.

    Three decades later, Little (Neeson, star of “Taken” and “Schindler’s List”) has been rehabilitated and released from prison, while Joe Griffen (Nesbitt, who led the cast of Paul Greengrass’ Northern Ireland historical drama “Bloody Sunday”) remains traumatized and bitter. When a television talk show brings them together for a live on-air reconciliation, two men haunted by one moment must come face to face with their own worlds of pain and violence ““ and the ever-present threat of revenge.

    FIVE MINUTES OF HEAVEN won the Directing Award and the World Cinema Screenwriting Award, and was nominated for the Grand Jury Prize, at the 2009 Sundance Film Festival.

    Oliver Hirschbiegel previously directed the Best Foreign-Language Film Oscar nominee “Downfall,” about Hitler’s final days, and the sci-fi thriller “The Invasion,” starring Nicole Kidman and Daniel Craig. BAFTA-winning screenwriter Guy Hibbert’s impressive body of work includes “Omagh” and “Prime Suspect.” Also in the FIVE MINUTES OF HEAVEN cast is Anamaria Marinca, star of the Cannes Golden Palm winner “4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days” as well as Francis Ford Coppola’s “Youth Without Youth.”

    Iron Man 2 – Review

    4918_1594708762When last we left our hero, he was on a podium proclaiming himself to be the real iron man. There was much fanfare and celebration but how does Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) fare in issue 2 of this comic book character come to life?

    Well, considering this is perhaps the most expensive romantic comedy ever made I would say it’s a success on multiple levels.

    That’s one of the things you’ll notice, if you’re feeling your way through Jon Favreau’s latest, a real sense that this is a pure four quadrant movie that appeals to every single, last demographic. It seems made with the intent to fully embrace every last man, woman, and child with its focus on bringing the most amount of action with the most amount of family friendly permissible T&A along with peppering the dialogue with enough mature bon mots and double entendres to make any parent squirmy. There seems to be a real need to be liked on all levels going on within this picture that you can’t help but feel that Favreau has delivered a movie that gives the people what they want, all of them, and, what’s remarkable, there isn’t any slack in this film. Every moment is earned, every line pushing this film to its eventual breaking point. I think, and if there is any indication that this movie isn’t as good as it could have been I couldn’t point it out, the movie doesn’t take a definitive stance with regard to its voice. In much the same way that Dark Knight had its voice, how X2 absolutely had one that set it apart from its peers and how Spider-Man 2 possessed one that made it a classic, Iron Man 2 is lacking in that regard. There are missed opportunities to delve deep into the man who wears this suit of iron, passed over chances to get beyond the snappy one-liners (and they are snappy thanks to Justin Theroux’s ear for witty rejoinders and Downey Jr.’s unmatchable delivery, creating a character with his own unique patios), and it all adds up to a movie that truly embraces the summer movie aesthetic in the most fun way possible.

    Meeting up with Stark, mere moments after where the first movie leaves off, we are right back to where we were when we last saw him. Basking in the glorious attention and filled with the kind of macho, funny bravado that made him such a delight in part 1. He’s in dire need of purpose when we meet up with him, although his tough candy shell would rather deflect than recognize how empty his castle really is, and this movie is all about this man’s quest for something more than dominance over the scientific and controllable. It’s a movie about a man’s need for love not only from the man who made him but from a woman that confounds him. What’s curious about the latter storyline is that it permeates the entire film. Tony tries to communicate the very human feelings which he’s been so adept at keeping sublimated towards Pepper Potts (Gwyneth Paltrow) but, like every good romantic comedy, it’s never quite the right time. The movie is brilliant in keeping every person who is seeing this movie invested on what’s happening, like a politician who relentlessly plays to his constituents, but that’s also where the movie loses its ability to some something more than just a great summer film.

    One of the story’s issues is Downey’s indulgence in excess, namely alcohol. Saving you the pain of getting into too much comic book fanboy detail there was a nine issue story arc within the Iron Man series in 1979 that dealt with Tony’s alcoholism. It was hailed then, and still is now, as one of the most important stories of the Iron Man saga. This was a chance to give the film a deep anchor, an opportunity for resonance far beyond the box office, but instead the subplot is given short shrift, relegated to a relatively quick realization and fixing of a problem as if it were a cut needing a band-aid. It was disappointing to see it used and rushed though so flippantly but, to come back as to why the film works on the levels it does, you can see why that decision was made. Mass appeal does not equate to an episode of Intervention, hence, it was ditched. Besides, he’s got bad guys to dispatch.

    The villains of this picture, Mickey Rourke and Sam Rockwell, play opposite ends of the evil spectrum that simply boggle the mind. Rockwell, playing arms manufacturer Justin Hammer, ought to be the kind of slippery cad that knows no boundaries and delight in being the kind of foil to Tony Stark worthy of our condemnation. Instead, he’s played like an ass, a buffoon. It confounds the mind to try and think of why you would want to have a man capable of so much dirty dealing and evil come off like a doofus who is only able to get out of bed without hurting himself by happenstance. Or, is it because Mickey Rourke, as the mighty Whiplash, tries to steal the show as he turns in a performance as one of the better villains we’ve ever been given in a movie like this? Unfortunately, there is not much to steal as we only get fits and starts with regard to his character, he appears briefly and we aren’t really given much beyond a few biographical factoids and tidbits. To Rourke’s credit, however, he uses what little time is given him to his advantage. Coming off a sympathetic turn in The Wrestler, he is able to play that other side, where the villainy oozes out of every dirty pore, every unwashed piece of hair.

    The film’s action set pieces, much like the first, are good and serviceable to a large degree. The CGI elements are pronounced in some areas and do take away from some of the passion that no doubt we’re supposed to feel as Iron Man defends truth, justice and the American way. If Justin Hammer’s eventual downfall is any representational barometer of the final act it is that the film’s action ends with a little more than a fizzled dream; exciting and somewhat filled with potential, sure, but it all comes crashing down quickly and with little more than a mild skirmish which ends exactly the way it should with there being no real danger to anyone or anything. Favreau hasn’t or didn’t learn anything from the all too brief ending to the first film as you go from final confrontation to resolution at breakneck speed. There is no savoring of the moment, no real drama, and the film suffers because of it. Not to be too glib about it but once the final confrontation happens you only have seconds to pay attention or else risk seeing how the ending plays itself out.

    Iron Man 2 as a summer artifact is one that fulfills every promise of what a summer tent pole should be: loud, bright, quick, and filled with enough for everyone. It’s a movie that will appeal to a wide spectrum of people on many levels. However, if there is anything to take away from this movie it is that this was a film that consciously decided it was not going to be anything more than what we’ve been given. It’s serviceable, fun but it lacks anything that will carry on long after you see the final moments on the screen. It’s disappointing that it couldn’t stretch beyond comic book-like depth but it’s nonetheless a good reason to get out of the house and enjoy on a big screen.

  • Weekend Shopping Guide 4/24/09: Top Gear

    weekendshopping.png

    The weekend’s here. You’ve just been paid, and it’s burning a hole in your pocket. What’s a pop culture geek to do? In hopes of steering you in the right direction to blow some of that hard-earned cash, it’s time for the Quick Stop Weekend Shopping Guide – your spotlight on the things you didn’t even know you wanted…

    (Also, please support Quick Stop by using the links below to make any impulse purchases – it helps to keep us going…)

    You only have to view the unedited, unadulterated, original episodes of the UK’s Top Gear to understand why the idea of making an “American edition” and jettisoning hosts Jeremy Clarkson, James May, and Richard Hammond is such a pig-ignorant idea. For one, it’s their interplay that makes the show – not the car talk. Secondly, it’s foolish to think it doesn’t translate to the US in its original form – because it does. Which is all to say that I highly recommend you pick up Top Gear 10: The Complete 10th Season (BBC, Not Rated, DVD-$39.98 SRP) and see my case being made before your eyes.

    thinkgeek-01.jpg

    Sometimes, life is about the simple pleasures. Sometimes, those simple pleasures have been shrunk down and conveniently made USB-powered. Such is the case with the USB Plasma Ball ($12.99), which is 6″ of Tesla-crafted joy. Stare into it, and you’ll swear you actually see… A plasma ball. A really, really cool plasma ball.

    thinkgeek-02.jpg

    DC continues to deliver top-notch collections of the post-Marvel work Jack Kirby did for the company in the 70’s with the release of his ragtag group of war heroes fighting at the height of World War II, The Losers (DC Comics, $39.99 SRP). When it comes to archive editions, DC is the company setting the bar.

    blankguide.gif

    Unlike most of Ron Howard’s filmic output, which often suffers from being uninspired and drab, I thought his adaptation of (Universal, Rated R, DVD-$29.98 SRP) succeeded in translating the energy and performances that made the stage version such a success to the big screen. Maybe that’s because it takes a lot of effort to stamp out the skill that Michael Sheen and Frank Langella bring to their performances as David Frost and the disgraced but defiant Richard Nixon. Bonus features include an audio commentary, deleted scenes, a making-of featurette, a look at the Nixon Library, and footage from the actual Frost/Nixon interviews. A Frost/NixonBlu-Ray edition ($39.98 SRP) is also available, with additional footage of the original interviews and background information.

    blankguide.gif

    If you were to take the wonderfully candid wrestling documentary Beyond The Mat and fictionalize it, you’d have the story of broken down wrestler Randy “The Ram” Robinson, a former superstar up against the ropes in The Wrestler (Fox, Rated R, DVD-$29.98 SRP). Physical and emotional pain etched across his haggard face, Mickey Rourke turns in a stunning performance as a guy who feels he’s gotten one more good match left in him, both inside and outside the ring. Bonus materials include a documentary spotlighting actual wrestlers, a roundtable discussion with same, and a Bruce Springsteen music video. A Blu-Ray edition ($39.99 SRP) is also available, with identical bonus materials.

    blankguide.gif

    Although the bulk of it doesn’t really hold up (the 90’s references shoveled throughout certainly make it less than timeless), I still have some affection for the episodes featured in Tiny Toon Adventures: Season 1 Volume 2 (Warner Bros., Not Rated, DVD-$44.98 SRP). Of special note, however, is that this set does contain the still-wonderful music videos episode, which featured many kids’ first introduction to the work of They Might Be Giants.

    blankguide.gif

    The second season of the ADD Freakazoid (Warner Bros., Not Rated, DVD-$26.98 SRP) hits DVD, with all 11 episodes spread across two discs. Bonus features include commentaries, a featurette, and an archival tape of composer Richard Stone at work.

    blankguide.gif

    Ian McKellen is truly incredible in the recent RSC production of King Lear (PBS, Not Rated, DVD-$24.99 SRP) – so much so that I’d say it’s a must see. So get it and do so. The disc also contains a bonus interview with McKellen.

    blankguide.gif

    Yes, I admit it – I watch iCarly (Nickelodeon, Not Rated, DVD-$26.98 SRP). Don’t get me wrong – I don’t watch it of my own volition. I watch it alongside my nephew, as its often sandwiched between episodes of Spongebob. And as kiddie fare go, it’s a decent show – funny and well-acted. So there. The second volume of the show’s first season contains 12 episodes and behind-the-scenes featurettes.

    blankguide.gif

    Peter Bogdanovich fans can get not only the director’s cut of his Last Picture Show, but also the new-to-DVD release of Nickelodeon in a two-disc Director’s Choice: Nickelodeon/The Last Picture Show double feature (Sony, Rated PG/R, DVD-$24.96 SRP). Bonus features include commentaries on both films, plus interviews & featurettes on Picture Show.

    blankguide.gif

    I’m no fan of rap and only marginally aware of the various rifts within its community, but I found Notorious (Fox, Rated R, DVD-$34.98 SRP) – about the life of The Notorious B.I.G. – to be a fascinating watch simply for the wonderful young actor filling the title role, Jamal Woolard. Bonus features include audio commentaries, making-of featurettes, concert footage, and deleted scenes. A Blu-Ray edition ($39.99 SRP) is also available with identical bonus materials.

    blankguide.gif

    I thought Robert Rodriguez & Frank Miller’s adaptation of Miller’s Sin City (Miramax, Not Rated, Blu-Ray-$35.99 SRP) was fine for what it was, but its slavish visual adherence to the original art grew tiresome after a bit, and the gimmick became more important than the characters or the story itself. Shame, really, because what could have been an interesting piece of neo-noir has instead become this generation’s Dick Tracy. The new Blu-Ray edition treats those gimmicky visuals nicely, and ports over the bonus materials from the standard DVD, plus an additional exclusive Cine-Explore feature.

    blankguide.gif

    Having moved on from saving the planet, Elmo is back to promote literacy with Sesame Street: Elmo And The Bookaneers (Genius, Not Rated, DVD-$14.93 SRP), about pirates who love to read. What’s more important, though, is its special guest – Tina Fey. Yes… Tina Fey.

    blankguide.gif

    If you’ve been anxiously awaiting the return of hillbilly squids, then you’re prayers are answered with the arrival of Squidbillies: Volume 2 (Adult Swim, Not Rated, DVD-$29.98 SRP). The 2-disc set features 20 episodes, plus oodles of bonus materials including featurettes, art, music, and more.

    blankguide.gif

    Ewing Oil was left a shambles at the end of season 10, but the eleventh season of Dallas (Warner Bros., Not Rated, DVD-$39.98 SRP) finds J.R. down but certainly not out, as he claws his way back from disaster, even if it means stepping on a few people along the way. The 3-disc set contains all 30 episodes.

    blankguide.gif

    If the leaked Wolverine workprint hasn’t extinguished your enthusiasm for all things hairy mutant, also being released is the animated Wolverine & The X-Men: Heroes Return Trilogy (Lionsgate, Not Rated, DVD-$14.98 SRP), I’m not entirely sure I understand the story they’re trying to tell, but the animation and character design is decent (even though the supposed-to-be-short Wolverine is now about 6’4). Bonus features include commentaries and behind-the-scenes featurettes.

    blankguide.gif

    We’ve made it to the halfway mark with the release of Hawaii Five-O‘s sixth season (Paramount, Not Rated, DVD-$49.99 SRP). Steve Garrett and his crack team are back on the sunny streets of the Pacific jewel in this 6-disc set, featuring all 24 episodes plus the original promos.

    blankguide.gif

    The Stuart Little animated series is an innocuous, affable affair that managed to hold my nephews’ attention (no small feat). Two volumes are now available – A Little Family Fun! & Going For The Gold! (Sony, Not Rated, DVD-$12.99 SRP each). Each disc contains a quartet of adventures.

    blankguide.gif

    The rich socialites of Knots Landing return for the complete second season (Warner Bros., Not Rated, DVD-$39.98 SRP), which features a very special visit from not only Bobby Ewing, but J.R. himself. The 4-disc set features all 18 episodes.

    blankguide.gif

    So there you have it… my humble suggestions for what to watch, listen to, play with, or waste money on this coming weekend. See ya next week…

    -Ken Plume

    ##

  • Trailer Park: Darren Aronofsky Part 2

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    I’m awesome. I wrote a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

    You’ve just to meet the twins.

    The Massie Twins are perhaps the best thing in the world to happen at interview sessions when you find yourself cursing your lot at not having access to a 1:1 with a true visionary. These guys, genuine twins, are perhaps the nicest, kindest, honest to a fault interviewers that I wish were at every interview situation. The talent that sees them just fall over themselves as they look at these grown men who dress and look alike. Myself, I do want to throw the yellow foul flag in that these guys like to think that since there’s two of them that in a roundtable situation they get 2 questions when everyone else their 1 but I’m quibbling and this was a chance to talk to Darren Aronofsky after all.

    When I had the chance to say hey once more to the guy who genuinely mixes enthusiasm for his job and a jaunty introspection in the way he speaks I could not pass it up. Darren is kind of person who is more interested in knowing what you thought about what he made than he is to tell you about it. When he rolled in with his tall tea, working a small packet of honey into his drink and then working his way though an orange, there is just no way you would guess by his humble persona that here is a man who has brought the world a film that is being mentioned in the same breath as other Oscar worthy productions; he defies the stereotype that you have to be a thick willed fist thumper to be great.

    Darren is great simply for spending time with some schlubs to chitter chatter about THE WRESTLER. I know a lot could be made of all the different people I am able to talk to but getting time with this guy simply trumps 99% of everything else I am able to do throughout the year. My inner nerd was satiated thoroughly for weeks after.

    CHRISTOPHER STIPP: I have been reading the interviews that after The Fountain you wanted to get back to basics. You just wanted to work with actors again. How does this experience, obviously they are two different movies, compare to The Fountain?

    ARONOFSKY: Well, ultimately it’s all very similar, the work. You have a very limited amount of time, amount of money. It doesn’t matter the scale of the film. You end up doing very similar stuff. There is just different challenges specific to the projects. This was the Mickey Rourke challenge for this film. Otherwise it was very similar but it’s amazing how quick it goes when you don’t have to do special effects. We finished shooting in March, so it’s been 6 months from the time we finished shooting that we were at the Venice Film Festival. So, that’s great. It was a lot of fun. I kind of admire Woody Allen for just being able to clock them out one a year.

    QUESTION: How do you go about choosing your next project? How did you go from The Fountain to this?

    ARONOFSKY: Well I was just looking for an actor’s piece. I looked at everything we had in development and this seemed like one of the strongest contenders as far as that. You never really know. When people ask me what’s next, I never really know. Until I have a script that’s like, “OK, I’m confident enough to jump in.”

    But I was looking for something that was an actor’s piece and I was kind of nervous about the wrestling elements because they were action and they would take their time because all I really wanted to do was like two actors in a room talking and see what I could do with that. But it seemed like the best thing I had ahead of me. Everyone else thought I was out of my mind. “What are you doing? A wresting picture with Mickey Rourke? Are you out of your mind? ”

    Now, in retrospect, the Mickey Rourke in the part makes sense but back then, no one wanted to support it.

    QUESTION: When you first got into it, Mickey Rourke was already attached to it?

    ARONOFSKY: I brought Mickey Rourke into it. I had an idea that when I graduated from film school in ’94 or ’95, I sat down and made a list of possible ideas for films. And the Wrestler was on that list. I can’t imagine the exact thought process but I think it came out of the idea that no one had done that world in a serious way. But then in about ’02, when The Fountain fell apart the first time, before I put it back together, I got together with this producer Scott Franklin who had been a producer on my first two films, together we started to work out story ideas and do some research and I chose him to produce it because he was a wrestling fan, more than me. So together we started to develop some stories and then about ’04 or ’05, we found Rob Siegel who was the editor of The Onion for 7 years and then he just seemed right for the material and that was about the same time the light bulb for Mickey Rourke went off.

    CS: Building on that, the light bulb for Mickey Rourke, and now it looks like a master stroke, one thing I noticed watching the movie is that I didn’t know where The Ram stopped and Mickey Rourke started.

    ARONOFSKY: Sure.

    CS: And everyone is talking about that part at the end when he talks about redemption.

    ARONOFSKY: You thought that moment worked?

    CS: I choked up myself.

    ARONOFSKY: Did you? During his speech?

    CS: During his speech. Like writers say, you have to earn it, you have to earn that moment. And not only did you earn it but I think Mickey earned it.

    ARONOFSKY: Well, Mickey ended up rewriting that to make it more personal. What happened, was me and Rob, the writer, went to this one match out in Long Island and this young wrester who was part of the Hart family which is a kind of a big famous wrestling dynasty, got up there and made this speech about very personal, a little too personal and I looked at Rob and we said, “Yeah, The Ram has got to make a speech at the end.”

    Rob wrote a speech at the end that was great but about 2 days before Mickey said, “I think I have some ideas for that, mind if I work on that?” We said “No, go ahead” and came in the day of and showed it to me and I said, “Do you really want to say this?” Because I knew what he was doing but we never talked about it. Never talked about the connection between the character and Mickey. It’s not really my business. Now we are very good friends and I talk to him about everything. But back then, our relationship was young. So he said “Yeah, I want to give it a shot” and basically we had 2 takes on it because there was a crowd of 2500 ““ 3000 people and the first take didn’t go too well.

    Then I talked to the crowd what the moment meant and the second take was that take.

    That take is all the way from him walking out of the curtain, going around the ring, and then he enters the ring, there was a second camera in the ring, and then that first camera ran around and up a ladder to shoot Marisa for that closeup while that second camera continued as he went and did the whole speech. So all of Marisa’s close-ups and Mickey’s speech happened at the same time. So, it was pretty cool and a lot of fun.

    QUESTION: How about Marisa and the rest of the cast? What was the casting process like?

    ARONOFSKY: Mickey was the first step. I didn’t really want to cast the daughter until we knew it was Mickey for sure, so once we figured out how to make the film with Mickey, Evan Rachel Wood seemed like a good option because I thought they had a similar round face and the lips were similar and I thought it was passable. It’s always hard when you cast two famous people as say, father/daughter or siblings, always a tricky thing. That worked out and then it was a very hard role to cast the stripper because every actor knows that within a few months of the release of the film those images are going to be on the internet forever and that’s part of the deal.

    But, I was just very clear that we are doing a very realistic film so the nudity had to be real. I about peeve when you see a couple waking up after having sex in a movie and they are trying to hold on to sheets so their privates don’t show. It’s just so unreal and pulls you out but this film was just so important that they are artist with their bodies and have to show their bodies. It’s all about that. So I put that out there and Marisa was a very early choice because I think her complexity is rarely tapped. She’s often playing very cutesy but I could tell she had a lot of depth. She brought a lot of life to a role that could have very easily been a cliché.

    QUESTION: So were you a fan of the whole independent wrestling circuit before this?

    ARONOFSKY: No. Not a fan now. I wouldn’t go back to a match ever.

    QUESTION: Before this did you go to a bunch of different matches?

    ARONOFSKY: We did a ton of research and went all over the place. Long two/three hour drives to go to places where sometimes there would be more wrestlers than there would be fans. We went to one autograph signing that totally inspired the autograph signing in our film where there were all these legends from Jimmy Snuka to Ricky Johnson, the Rock’s uncle, Captain Lou Albano was there, Iron Sheik was there, Nikoli Volkoff was there, it was a huge, great legends there. It was so sad for these legends. So sad.

    QUESTION: Where did the staple gun come from? Did you see that?

    ARONOFSKY: Oh yeah. Much worse. Necro Butcher is this kind of underground cult American hero. He is the marquee, top billing draw to a lot of these events. When he comes out the crowd goes crazy because they know they are going to get their blood. It’s a funny story actually. We were casting all day and it was tough. We cast in my office. My office ended up smelling like Ben Gay for weeks afterwards. And these guys would come in and I wanted to see their gimmicks. That’s what they called their costumes. Their costumes are their gimmicks. So they would slather themselves with Ben Gay. It was a long day and a lot of them were terrible actors, some were OK.

    Necro Butcher lives out in Pittsburgh, doesn’t have a cell phone and just drives everywhere. Pittsburgh to Manhattan is probably about 12 hours so no one had heard from him, called his girlfriend, she was nervous because he hadn’t checked in. I was leaving and I got on the train and my phone doesn’t usually work on there but the phone rings and they said Necro Butcher just showed up. And he’s like the only guy on the planet, except for maybe George Clooney, who could have shown up in my office that I would have gone back because I was so exhausted I just wanted to go home. So I got out, went back and he was the sweetest guy in the world. He’s a military guy so everything is yes sir, no sir, thank you sir. When he read the script he said thank you for making a movie about my life sir, it means so much to me sir and then”¦ he’s this sick mother fucker. The guy in the hardcore match. He’s a great guy. That scene when they talk about the staple gun, that was just improvised. I said “Have a conversation, tell him where you’re from, tell him about the match” and they just came up with the lines themselves and that’s what happened.

    CS: The music. Two things about the shift from your previous films ““ you went through a very long, long stretch in the beginning of that film and you just don’t hear anything. What was Clint’s job when he said, “What do I have to do with this?”

    ARONOFSKY: We almost went without a score with this one. The film ultimately didn’t need one but because whenever we stuck score music in it kind of made the emotion of the scene collapse. I think just because there was such a tender line and so naturalistic that if you stuck something unnatural like a score, it really hurt.

    So it was a very slim score but probably the hardest score he’s ever done according to himself. And I think the reason for that is because it just had to be atmospheric. It had to just kind of create the mood but not add to the emotional content of the actors. So, that’s what the score is doing. When we started to hear guitars that’s when we came up with the idea for Slash so he came in the recording. He’s a great guy. Really sweet guy. Not your typical rock star.

    And then the Bruce song was all because of Mickey. Mickey wrote him a letter and they are old friends and ended up doing it for free just to support the film. And to support Mickey really.

    THE MASSIE TWINS: You refer to your films”¦

    ARONOFSKY: Do you guys really wear the same shirts?

    (Laughs)

    THE MASSIE TWINS: It’s for a picture with you afterwards.

    ARONOFSKY: Oh, OK. You don’t do that everyday? That would be really upsetting.

    (Laughs)

    ARONOFSKY: One of you has got to get Lasik and screw with the other one.

    QUESTION: You refer to your films as wild style. How would you refer the Wrestler?

    ARONOFSKY: Wild style has definitely taken a trip away so I don’t know. I think, if I was going to use a hip-hop term because I used a hip-hop term back then, it would be something like, it’s more of a tag. Do you know what that is? It’s just very street style. I call it pro-active documentary style because I wanted to do a documentary style because I’m a verite but because I knew somewhat what the actors were going to do and what the plot was you can lead them a bit or be ahead of them a tiny bit or really work with them almost like dancing with them. We knew what they were going to do so we were with them. If something different happened, we were able to adjust as well because there was a human operator holding the camera. That’s why it’s a proactive documentary style.

    QUESTION: Online it shows that you are going to be associated with the Robocop remake. Any truth to that at all?

    ARONOFSKY: Well, we’re working on a script. It’s just a development deal but we have a long way to go. We have a great writer and we’ll see what happens.

    QUESTION: Do you use the internet for feedback? Do you Google yourself and see what people are saying?

    ARONOFSKY: Not too much. I look at some of the film blogs just so I know what’s happening in the film business. Like Slash Film, Hollywood Elsewhere. There are a few sites I’ll check once a day just to see what’s the latest news is. But I think it’s bad to read your reviews because that’s not what it’s about. It’s about making stuff and then moving on and keep making stuff and you’ve wasted time looking at stuff.

    CS: I read an interview with Mickey Rourke when you approached him to do it. It was basically a Come to Jesus meeting of you telling him what you expected out of him. Can you explain the process of convincing the people who had the purse strings that he was the person you wanted and then to Mickey telling him, “There’s a lot on the line right now…”

    ARONOFSKY: First I went to Mickey because I knew it would be difficult to raise the money for Mickey but I first wanted to be sure that if I wanted to do the hard work of trying to find money to finance a film that he would show up and want to do it and wanted to get back to work. And once I got that kind of understanding with him, it was really hard to find the money. It took us about two years to finance the film and every single financier in the business said no.

    Every single financier in the business said no. Everyone.

    We went to all kinds of different types of financing ““ studios passed. Everyone passed. Independent. International. Except for one French company that was offering way too little money to make it but they at least were supporting us with full creative freedom. So we figured out how to make it for 6 million dollars and we did it.

    QUESTION: You have incredible detail for the visual elements, how was your dynamic with your cinematographer?

    ARONOFSKY: She was great. It was the first time I worked with Maryse Alberti. The whole crew was an improvement. I wanted to do something very different and reinvent myself. I’ve joked that if Madonna taught us anything, it’s that you need to reinvent yourself and I think that’s true as a creative person, you have to just keep mixing it up and changing and moving forward. So, Maryse was an interesting candidate because, not only has she done some great features like Happiness and Velvet Goldmine back in the day but then she ended up doing a lot of documentaries like Crumb and Enron and Taxi to the Dark Side. She had exactly what I needed, had a film background plus documentary. Once I heard about her I was very intrigued. We talked on the phone and got along pretty well. She’s a spunky French girl and she was just great. Basically I only had to wait 5 minutes, the longest time I had to wait. She would just go in, light it, no baloney and we would shoot.

    QUESTION: Do you have any plans on doing cameos in your films?

    ARONOFSKY: I used to back in the day but it’s too stressful and there’s enough people who do it. I’ll just stay behind the camera. I’m not really actor.

    CS: When you were writing this script and coming off The Fountain where your head was at after it got the reception that it did, how did you know that The Wrestler was going to be the one? The only reason I’m asking this question is that I’ve read about you wanting to make a tent pole, that you have the ambition that you could. It’s not that you want to be an independent guy for the rest of your life. This is a $6 million dollar picture and not a tent pole, was there any impetus for wanting to go the tent pole route or get back to basics with this?

    ARONOFSKY: It wasn’t about that. There was no tent pole that was that interesting which is probably going to be the case for a long time. This was the most interesting project in front of me. For me, The Fountain was the exact film I wanted to make and it’s got a great split of people who hate it and people who love it and I think the people who love it are starting to win as time goes by and I think choosing The Wrestler really was not a reaction to anything about The Fountain except that the first three films was the same filmmaking team, the same producer, the same dp, the same production designer, the same editor and it kind of just was the end of an era and I was a dad and just wanted to do something different. I looked for the most radically different thing I could do and it just seemed like it, and it was. It didn’t fit into anything I had done and I liked that idea of breaking out of molds.

    QUESTION: Did you see the film with an audience?

    ARONOFSKY: Yes, at festivals.

    QUESTION: What did you think about the reactions? There are some parts where people were laughing and they were comedic at a superficial level but if you really thought about it they were really tragic. Did you notice that?

    ARONOFSKY: Yes. I love that there’s humor. And yes, they are laughing at things that are really kind of tragic but it’s meant to be funny. That’s part of what Mickey brought to the table. It’s OK to laugh at him sometimes and it’s OK to laugh with him and he’s laughing a lot and even in sadness there’s a lot of humor. But even that deli scene, it’s a really sad scene that this guy’s been reduced to this level but you just kind of root for him deep down. I think it means they are connected with him. You are never really laughing at The Ram in a way that he wouldn’t be OK with.

    QUESTION: Building on that, how was it at Venice and getting the Golden Lion?

    ARONOFSKY: To be honest we finished the film two days before. And about two weeks before we were thinking about pulling out. Not because we weren’t going to finish but because I wasn’t sure the Venice crowd would go for it. It’s a small film and they like literary efforts it seems like. Everyone dreams about winning a gold medal but to be honest, I never, ever dreamt that the Golden Lion would be possible. I didn’t even fantasize about it. I just thought “OK, we’ll go, and hopefully survive and get some good notices internationally and maybe might get recognized” because I knew that Mickey was doing some good work but it was a complete surprise.

    I remember the first thing that happened was that we went out to lunch after the judges had seen the film and we were at lunch with one of the distributors and she got a phone call and she said the jury really liked it. So I thought, that’s cool. I still never put it together of what that meant because she kind of slipped it. But then we had a press conference and the press gave us a standing ovation which is something I’ve never seen. The press is usually jaded.

    (Laughs)

    At the film festival we were the last movie, the last film of the festival and usually the last film of the festival is the crappiest film because it’s the worst lot because everyone has left by that point. The sexy part is the first weekend and we were the final, 10th day or 12th day, the last film. So half the audience stood up and I’m like “OK, that’s weird” because the press was very friendly which in Venice they can be really tough and after our public screening, which was great, the audience really liked it. They didn’t really laugh at the humor which concerned me but I think the humor was very American and subtle in a lot of ways.

    The head of the jury pulled us into his office and popped some champagne and said you guys are going to have to stay. I said, what do you mean I’m going to have to stay? We have to go to Toronto to sell the movie. And he said, no you have to stay. So I said, do I have to stay or does Mickey have to stay? He said, no you both have to stay. So I said, do we sorta have to stay or do we really have to stay? I mean, how much? And so it was just wild. Way beyond our expectations.

    Wednesday we finished the film, Thursday we got to Venice, Friday we screened, Saturday we won The Golden Lion and Sunday we woke up at 5:00 AM, flew to Toronto, got there at 3:00 PM, screened it at 6:00 PM and sold it at 5:00 AM in the morning to Fox Searchlight. So it was really like in 6 days it was one of those things. It all seems surreal but it was a good time.

  • Trailer Park: Darren Aronofsky Interview – Part 1

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    I’m awesome. I wrote a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

    While you’re at it, follow me over at Twitter! You can find me here at: Twitter.com/Stipp I’m not sure what I’m doing, I’m not positive I’ve gotten down what a “hash tag” is but I do know I haven’t asked anyone to get off my virtual lawn.

    Darren Aronofsky got jailed in East Germany. I had no clue. The arrest and the subsequent punishment made the press day all that more hilarious…From hiking mountains, his honest view of The Matrix and the latest Star Wars entries, what got Marisa Tomei in tip top shape to play a stripper, why we re-named a mountain because of its derogatory implications, why he’s angry about the digital releases of his films and oodles of completely useless but fascinating information.

    This is going to be a funky 2 part interview. I’m actually reversing things. Usually you would get the proper interview and the outtakes but I’m flipping it here because I feel like it. What’s contained in this thing was just too good not to run first. You’ll get the straight laced interview next week so I hope you dig this.

    What follows is, genuinely, a lunch with Darren Aronofsky. I talked to the guy, along with some other journos, during the Phoenix press day for THE WRESTLER. The interview was odd, and I’ll get into this later, in that it was just me and one more film site and then another guy who accidentally showed up late with about 5 minutes left in the interview. The situation was absolutely bizarre in that to further increase the oddity factor this interview was not held in some hotel room, it was in a vacated condominium. After I was about to leave the hotel where the interview took place, and I could have had the opportunity to talk to Marisa Tomei with the other guys, but I didn’t and don’t belong to the Phoenix Film Critics Society and was, therefore, denied entry into the interview room.

    Lord knows I would never be part of club that would have me as a member but considering that of the whole city of Phoenix you had 2 outlets representing the entire metropolitan area it didn’t make sense that my conditional membership would have prevented me from asking a few questions. Believe me, there were no sour grapes at all as I am comfortably numb to just go with the flow. One of the solid PR reps who has been an absolute godsend in my tenure here in the Phoenix area – he was the very first guy who helped me get Darren the last time he came through town for THE FOUNTAIN – suggested I walk across the hall to another abandoned condo that was being set up for what was a Meet and Greet luncheon with both Darren and Marisa. The spread was phenomenal. Meats and cheeses of all different varieties. Fruit and veggies and breads of various kinds. Now, while Darren eventually saddled up close to me at the one of two tables for the event (I believe there was only about a dozen or so people who were invited to this mid-day hootenanny) I decided to click on my recorder and capture some real interesting tidbits about THE WRESTLER and when we can expect a better version of PI on DVD.

    CHRISTOPHER STIPP: Was the deli scene improvised or was it all scripted?

    DARREN ARONOFSKY: It was 50/50. A lot of it was improvised. We couldn’t close the deli in the supermarket, people were coming by and ordering stuff, and I said, “Mickey, go serve them,” and he just said, “Do you mind if we shoot you?” People couldn’t really recognize him, he couldn’t really be famous, his hair was up. It was hard to recognize him.

    CS: Was the potato salad lady real?

    ARONOFSKY: A little more, a little less? She was a real actress. The woman who ordered the fried chicken was fake, half of them were fake. And at one point the manager of the deli came over to me and said, “Can you ask Mickey to improve his handwriting? ” And I said, “What are you talking about?” I guess people were really buying the meat!

    He was scribbling nonsense. Between takes he’s not sterile…he’s wiping his nose….

    (Laughs)

    QUESTION: The character reminds me in some odd way of Charlize Theron’s MONSTER. He’s not the kind of person that you would associate with, and you would almost avoid him, but he has so much heart, so much humanity that you are just pulling for him all the way. And I felt like, Marisa’s character, I didn’t want him to go in that ring, I wanted him to go with her. And of course I loved that you just leave it up to our imagination what happened there. You just root for him all the way.

    ARONOFSKY: Thank you so much. I’m glad. It’s kind of the magic of cinema. I’ve been watching My Neighbor Totoro, the Miyazaki film, with my 2 ½ year old and we watch it over and over again and that’s about a 7 year old Japanese animated film and that’s the beauty of film is that you can connect with Randy the Ram or a 7 year old animated Japanese girl and it’s just humanness.

    QUESTION: I was talking to Marisa, she mentioned that one of her favorite scenes was shopping for the clothes, and I said it was nerve wracking when he pulls out that sweater and I’m thinking, “You made the wrong decision.” And then here’s the second package and she said originally that there may have only been the one gift.

    ARONOFSKY: Yeah, the pea coat evolved because we realized that it was just too ridiculous just like that. It made sense because it made him more thankful to Marisa’s character and she kind of saved him as well. The script evolved a lot. There must have been 25-30 drafts. I tortured the writer. Normally I torture myself so it was really nice to have someone else do the heavy lifting.

    (Marisa Tomei enters the luncheon)

    Hello Marisa. Everybody this is Marisa.

    MARISA TOMEI: Hello everybody.

    (Applause)

    [Ed. note – I have no idea why people felt compelled to clap. I kept eating my hummus and pita.]

    SOME RANDOM A-HOLE: You look beautiful.

    [Ed. note – I have no idea what sycophant tossed this out there but they obviously had grand illusions of possibly scoring with her at the hot artichoke dip table]

    ARONOFSKY: Tell them your secret.

    TOMEI: Hula hoops.

    (Laughs)

    ARONOFSKY: Yeah, she had the hula hoop everywhere.

    QUESTION: How often do you hula hoop?

    TOMEI: I do do it everyday.

    QUESTION: How long to you do it?

    TOMEI: The longer you do it, the better. Less than an hour.

    ARONOFSKY: Would you drop it after an hour?

    TOMEI: I won’t do it longer than an hour anyway.

    QUESTION: You are a tough interviewer.

    [Ed. note – No, this person was not being ironic.]

    ARONOFSKY: She talks about it all the time and I never really asked.

    TOMEI: I try to get people into it. I gave a lot of people hoops for Christmas last year.

    QUESTION: Did you take a lot of dancing classes, especially with the pole work?

    TOMEI: I took pole classes. The pole is different than stripping. It’s more athletic, more like gymnastics. Like doing the uneven bars. I was always a balancing, floor work kind of girl. When I was young I went to tap school and jazz school and I do have a natural flexibility. I tried to use the assets that I had and then learned more skills. It’s very hard.

    He has a new found respect for wrestlers and I have a new found respect for strippers. It really is not easy.

    QUESTION: What attracted you to the role?

    TOMEI: Part of it was that. I wanted to do that. I wanted to work on this film.

    QUESTION: It was moving and I was really touched.

    [Ed. note – Can you see what I am up against here?]

    TOMEI: Women like it better than the men ““ at least my character. They really have a reaction.

    QUESTION TO ARONOFSKY: When did you finish the movie?

    ARONOFSKY: We finished filming in March. It was really quick work. We started filming in late January or early February. It took a long time to get the money ““ about two years. And during that time we kept working on the script.

    QUESTION: How’s Noah’s Ark?

    ARONOFSKY: Working on it. We’re doing a graphic novel of it. That will probably come out first probably. We’ve been interviewing a bunch of people and negotiating because we don’t know where we’re going to get the money for it.

    QUESTION: The guy who did The Fountain graphic novel is doing the story board for the Jodorowsky film, King Shot I believe it is?

    ARONOFSKY: Kent Williams? Really? So Jodorowsky is working now?

    QUESTION: Yeah, he’s working with Marilyn Manson and Nick Nolte in King Shot.

    ARONOFSKY: Have they started shooting?

    QUESTION: I think they were scheduled to start.

    ARONOFSKY: That’s wild. What’s the premise?

    QUESTION: It’s set in the desert and there is a casino which is the head of Christ, beard, everything. Marilyn Manson is going to be the pope.

    ARONOFSKY: Geez. So it’s buried up to here? Up to here? And the top is Christ’s head.

    QUESTION: Yeah, casino slash bar or whatever.

    ARONOFSKY: And some drama unfolds inside.

    Good for him. I met him at a film festival in Spain at a sci-fi fantasy film fest and he came to a screening of The Fountain and he was great.

    QUESTION: Have you read his comics?

    ARONOFSKY: A bit. But don’t really care for them too much. I like his films but his comics go too far I think. I think it’s good that he has limitations. But, he’s getting rediscovered now. His DVD boxed set. So, it’s pretty cool.

    QUESTION: Where’s the Aronofsky boxed set?

    ARONOFSKY: We’ll see.

    CS: Do you have any involvement in that at all?

    ARONOFSKY: A little bit. They did do a Pi / Requiem boxed set but I was pissed off.

    CS: You didn’t like that one?

    ARONOFSKY: No, because what happened is that I called them up and said it was the 10th anniversary of Pi. “We should do a 5.1 mix for it,” I said. We did it old school with a stereo mix. I think it might have surrounds but it’s not 5.1. My crew wanted to go in for free and just wanted to update it and they said, “Why don’t we just put out a box set?” I said, “No, I don’t want to put out a box set. I want to do a re-mix of Pi.” But they wouldn’t do it.

    The film comes back to me in 10 years. I sold it for 20 years. And at the time I remember they almost broke the deal. They said, “We’re not giving it back to you.” And I said, “Then I’m breaking the deal. I want it back.” And now it’s been 10 years. Amazing how time goes by. Maybe then I’ll do a 5.1 update.

    QUESTION: Any special edition for Requiem?

    ARONOFSKY: We got everything out on that DVD. It was a good DVD. There was so much on there ““ Easter Egg ““ we worked hard on that.

    CS: Not so much on The Fountain?

    ARONOFSKY: The Fountain? I was pissed off as shit, man. Whatever. It made less money internationally than Requiem did. Made less than Pi did. They just completely dumped it. If it doesn’t go for blockbuster they just”¦. I said, “Just do an art house release, you’ll get your money back. There’s enough people out there…” But they didn’t. When it went to DVD they just kind of dumped it and I didn’t give them any support.

    CS: The commentary track you did was a rare freebie.

    ARONOFSKY: That’s cool. It was one way of doing it. But at some point I’ll get enough power to put that out in the right way.

    (Laughs)

    It’s all about power.

    QUESTION: Is it out on Blue Ray yet?

    ARONOFSKY: It is out on Blu Ray. It looks OK and sounds OK. My sound guys still think it’s the best mix we ever did. So I think the sound mix is good.

    CS: Some filmmakers make their films, shooting material specifically for the DVD ““ this obviously was a low budget film. Did you do anything special?

    ARONOFSKY: For the Wrestler? Not really. There is going to be an hour long documentary which is going to be really great. I’ve already seen a trailer for it and it’s really cool. Same guy who did the documentary for The Fountain

    It’ll be a good one.

    CS: Commentary?

    ARONOFSKY: I don’t think so. I don’t think I have the energy to do it. Maybe if I can get Mickey to do it with me. We could just sit there and joke and smoke a couple cigars to get through it.

    CS: Do you have an aversion of seeing your films or are you just done with it?

    ARONOFSKY: I just think you shouldn’t go back there. You watch it so many times when you are finishing it because you have to go over it inch by inch and then when all the technical stuff you have to go over it and by the time you’re done you are so exhausted from it.

    CS: Why does Lucas keep going back to the well?

    ARONOFSKY: Howard the Duck.

    QUESTION: That was supposed to come out on DVD.

    ARONOFSKY: It’s not out on DVD?

    QUESTION: Not officially. But you can get it.

    ARONOFSKY: Those second pre-Star Wars sucked, didn’t they?

    CS: Yes.

    ARONOFSKY: Indiana Jones sucked.

    Question: But a lot of critics liked that one. They said it was right in the same vein as the other ones ““ and it was like, “No, it’s not. It’s terrible.”

    ARONOFSKY: I actually liked the aliens part of it ““ when the thing took off – I liked the ending but the action scene through the jungle and stretching of the jeeps and stuff…it was just terrible action.

    QUESTION: Cate Blanchett. She looked cool in the trailers.

    ARONOFSKY: She did look cool in the trailers.

    Question: I was waiting for the face melting off scene but then it was so stupid ““ just this blur of special effects ““ couldn’t even tell what was going on. What was funny that a lot of people don’t realize that early on she was supposed to have psychic powers and she goes to Harrison Ford “You’re a hard man to read” and then the rest of it was supposed to be about her powers.

    ARONOFSKY: She was supposed to have powers?

    QUESTION: Yeah, she was supposed to have psychic powers but couldn’t read Indiana Jones.

    ARONOFSKY: She quit. The other night I saw the 2nd or 3rd Matrix while I was surfing through the channels on TV. Oh man, that’s bad. I really kind of like them too but it doesn’t really hold up. There’s a scene in Zion…the costumes are terrible.

    The Massie Twins: The whole story falls apart because they tried to split it between two movies so then number 2 doesn’t make sense and number 3 doesn’t do a good job of resolving anything. It’s too abstract. Although I like the action in number 2. I liked the drunk.

    ARONOFSKY: I don’t remember the drunk. Oh yeah, the albino.

    The Massie Twins: Yeah, he dresses up for Halloween ““ we bought the official costumes from Matrix.com and had all the makeup.

    ARONOFSKY: Did you look good?

    The Massie Twins: Yeah, I thought we did.

    (Laughs)

    The Massie Twins: We were over on Mill Avenue and thousands and thousands of people gather there people were taking pictures. We took like 3rd place for the costumes. That was the best part about Matrix is the fact that they created those characters.

    ARONOFSKY: So, there you have it.

    (Laughs)

    CS: You mentioned you started out not knowing a whole lot about wrestlers.

    ARONOFSKY: Yeah.

    CS: On the other side when you saw that moment when The Ram was sitting at the table for a signing and you see a guy with a catheter and a lot of other broken men. Did you see a lot of that, guys all busted up?

    ARONOFSKY: We went to an autograph show that was just desperate. All these legends and nobody there. It was just desperate. The catheter and the urine bag was fictional but there was a guy in a wheelchair that we saw. Actually Lou Albano was there. I think I talked about that, but he looked terrible. I didn’t even recognize him, that’s how bad he looked. He had a lot of strokes and it was just sad, holding on to that glory.

    Can’t you wait to see what Paris Hilton will turn into?

    (Laughs)

    ARONOFSKY: It’s the reason I stay alive, just to watch her decay.

    (Laughs)

    CS: So how much longer are you on this tour?

    ARONOFSKY: I’m almost done. I’ve got two more cities. We’re going to go to San Francisco and Seattle. I’ve never done Russia so I want to go. My grandparents came from Russia and I’m very curious to see it.

    QUESTION: How many places have you been too before here?

    ARONOFSKY: Too many.

    Question: All over the U.S.?

    ARONOFSKY: Not really, just major cities. San Diego, Boston, D.C., Miami, Dallas.

    QUESTION: If they make you go all over the place they should make you go in a straight line.

    ARONOFSKY: Did Will Smith come through here for Seven Pounds? He seemed to be one city ahead of us. I think he’s doing St. Louis, Cleveland, he does tiny towns. I was talking to his people in Dallas, he comes with a private plane, 4 SUV’s, they got two giant tour buses that are wrapped with the poster and his face.

    (Laughs)

    It’s just like a circus. The fact that he does that at that level just shows you how hard a job it is. I guess he does it for every movie.

    QUESTION: What about Mickey? Did you try to get him to come on this thing?

    ARONOFSKY: I don’t think he could have handled the pace of it. He’s actually 57 years old or so ““ I don’t know how old he is, so don’t quote me on that, I don’t think he can handle it. I’m getting a day off tomorrow and I’m going to stay here. It was between here or going to San Fran. I know what San Fran looks like and I’m so glad I’m staying. I’m going to climb Camelback tomorrow. I’m very excited. And go to the Botanical Gardens, that’s my day.

    QUESTION: Take lots and lots of water.

    [Ed. Note – Keep reading this stream of consciousness. I have no idea who was talking but it’s quite a bizarre, hilarious exchange.]

    ARONOFSKY: Even though it’s cold you have to just keep drinking, right?

    QUESTION: Yes. And Run from the bees.

    ARONOFSKY: What bees? What are you talking about?

    QUESTION: Swarms.

    ARONOFSKY: There are bee swarms?

    QUESTION: Along the mountains there are.

    ARONOFSKY: Really? Tell me more.

    [Ed. Note – Point, Aronofsky]

    QUESTION: Mountain lions, jack-a-lopes.

    ARONOFSKY: Any of you climb that thing?

    QUESTION: Yeah.

    ARONOFSKY: Is it hard?

    CS: No. It’s all relative. You are not running up the mountain.

    ARONOFSKY: Four hours, right?

    CS: No, not a chance. Unless you’re 80 and have a heart condition. Maybe 45 minutes. Depending on how fast you move. Are you taking a leisurely stroll?

    ARONOFSKY: Yeah.

    QUESTION: It’s tougher than Squaw Peak.

    ARONOFSKY: I’ve heard that. That’s been renamed right? Is that because it’s a racist term?

    QUESTION: That was part of why they wanted to rename it. There was just a real outcry that she be recognized, which was nice.

    ARONOFSKY: Who was she?

    QUESTION: Laurie Piestewa was the first Native American killed in combat. She was ambushed with Jessica Lynch.

    ARONOFSKY: Was that the first Iraq war or the second Iraq war?

    QUESTION: That was the second one.

    ARONOFSKY: Jessica Lynch was the second war? This war?

    QUESTION: Yeah, can you believe it?

    ARONOFSKY: When George W. was in office?

    QUESTION: Yeah.

    ARONOFSKY: That’s crazy. That feels like the first war. Really? That’s when we were all pro-war and she was a hero and everything.

    QUESTION: It would be nice to be living in a time when we didn’t have a war.

    ARONOFSKY: Yea. Well that’s these kids. When were you born? 80’s?

    The Massie Twins: ’84.

    ARONOFSKY: Right when the Cold War was winding down. You don’t even remember the Cold War do you? But you’ve heard about it, right?

    The Massie Twins: Yeah. Just what’s in the history books.

    ARONOFSKY: I got arrested in East Berlin.

    CS: Really?

    ARONOFSKY: For stealing an East German flag. I was there on May Day and there were flags everywhere and I told someone I was going to steal a flag. So I lowered a flag and stuffed it down my pants and I hear, “Passport!”

    And they took me to this East German jail. We had to be back across the border by 10:00 PM to get through Checkpoint Charlie. So I was in jail. They took away my shoelaces, took away my belt so I wouldn’t hang myself. It was a concrete room with just a little peephole.

    I was crying.

    I was 17-18 years old. I was just sobbing. And finally they came and said they would let me go if I just raised the flag. I said absolutely. I don’t care. I’ll raise your flag. So we go and me and the Australian kid raised the flag and he said what are you doing because we were raising it upside down.

    (Laughs)

    We walked across Checkpoint Charlie at 1:00 o’clock in the morning.

    Question: That’s amazing.

    ARONOFSKY: It’s a good story though.

  • Opinion In A Haystack: Buck Shots – Round 2

    haystackheader.jpg

    buckshotstroll2quicksize1.jpg

    Money Shot (Wikipedia): provocative, sensational, or memorable sequence in a film, on which the film’s commercial performance is perceived to depend.

    Buck Shot: moments on which a film’s cheese-factor is based, often underlining the tone of the entire production and providing the viewer with the opposite effect intended.

    Round 2: WET MUSCLES AND DOOKIE!!!

    (Here’s Round 1)

    No Holds Barred (1989) ““ HULK HOGAN PONDERS A FAMILIAR SCENT

    Tag Lines:

    • No Ring. No Ref. No Rules.
    • The battle of the super tough guys.

    Who would have thought that only 19 years after No Holds Barred that a celebrated filmmaker, Darren Aronofsky, would take the subject of wrestling and make an Oscar worthy piece of art along side one of the greatest comeback performances in the history of cinema? The end of 2008 has brought us a film, The Wrestler, which proves that no genre is too silly or maligned to not only be salvaged, but perfected to the point of beauty. However, in no way does this take any of the joy out of watching a genius piece of camp like No Holds Barred, easily Hulk Hogan’s greatest screen performance (right above Suburban Commando of course.)

    NHB, as it’s called on the streets, is one of those glorious titles that is made up of almost 100% Buck Shots. This is due to several competing factors. Hogan’s plethora of skin tight, rainbow tinted, spandex outfits worn through out the film to Tiny Lister’s extremely heavy breathing every second he is in frame to the great Kurt Fuller playing an evil fight promoter that calls everyone a “JOCKASS,” this movie is brimming with endless moments of pure delight. All of this is complimented by the awesome 80’s fight scenes, the rouges gallery of silly contestants, the title of the film’s fight competition: THE BATTLE OF THE TOUGH GUYS (yeah, no joke) and the single greatest “poopy scene” of the entire decade. The plot is simple. Hulk Hogan, showing his acting range, plays the world wrestling champion named Rip. His catch phrase is, you guessed it: “RIP “˜EM!” He is challenged to a NO HOLDS BARRED fight by an ex-convict named Zeus, played to hardcore perfection by Tiny Lister (best known as Debo from Friday, or the President from The Fifth Element.) Rip initially refuses to fight him, but eventually gives in due to various factors and they have an all out brawl in which no holds, NONE, are barred.

    Hindsight is 20/20, and it is easy to look back on movies like this and laugh, but I will admit that I unabashedly love this movie in all its zany, kick ass, and slightly homosexual tension. It might be because of the camp, it might be the nostalgia, but I love it. Sue me. I even own the VHS and One sheet. You need to have a firm grasp on crap to know the opposite of such, and there is a lot of crap that is truly great”¦No Holds Barred being that very crap. So as someone who knows every inch of this Rocky 3-rip-off-cheesy-wrestling masterpiece I can safely say that the following scene is the greatest moment of its run time. Here we have Hogan, LITERALLY, explode out the top of the top of the limo in which he is being held captive. The heavy guitar starts up, Hulk begins throwing bad guys left and right. He tosses two full grown men completely over the limo, then one into the windshield, then back-punches a guy through the passenger window, followed by stuffing another bad-dude into the roof hole. The violent rage is just too much for the driver, as he sits in fear of what the Hulkster will do next. Hogan pulls the driver out of the car”¦and”¦well”¦one of the greatest dialogue exchanges of all time then occurs between them. The actor playing the limo driver has the edge here for most “buck-shoty,” but Hulk’s use of breathing and overblown eye movements keep him right up there as well. It’s one of those “How did this make the cut and what were they thinking?” moments. Watch:

    R.O.T.O.R. (1989) ““ R.O.T.O.R. vs. BOB’S COUNTRY BUNKER

    Tag Line:

    • Judge, Jury, and Executioner.

    R.O.T.O.R. or, more specifically, the Robotic Officer of the Tactical Operations Research unit is probably the best example of the sheer glut of uninspired low budget dreck that was churned out during the VHS boom all those centuries ago. No part of this movie is even remotely original. The poster, as admittedly awesome as it is, is completely stolen from Mad Max. The plot is completely ripped from Terminator, sans the time travel. The only reason one can’t rag on it for stealing Judge Dredd‘s tagline is that it was released prior. Also, the title is excessively annoying to type due to the damn periods.

    I was lucky enough to stumble onto the destruction path of R.O.T.O.R. through the miracle of Cinemax circa 2000. My friend, I shall refer to him as Pie, caught it around the same time and both of us marveled at how downright awful it was. Luckily the video store I was managing had a VHS copy so I could spread the joy among the unenlightened. It’s mostly (mostly…not totally) boring, incompetent and completely devoid of coherence. As Pie pointed out, the entire film seems to be completely over dubbed with separate audio, and upon further viewings it became exceedingly obvious that the editors chucked out some underlying story lines which culminated in the main character getting shot in the back while walking to his car AFTER the R.O.T.O.R. was dead and gone. I’ve watched the movie all the way through about three times and still don’t understand why exactly that happens, but it makes it all the funnier.

    The plot is a tale as old as time. A “special unit” laboratory creates a police robot to fight crime, something goes wrong, robot malfunctions, robot drives away on it’s motorcycle and begins murdering innocents that don’t realize he is, in fact, a robot. If only all Sci-fi characters would heed the words of Jeff Goldblum: “your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should.” However they don’t heed those words and this is what happens”¦a robot with a mustache punches them in the face.

    As boring and uneventful as the film is, there are at least 3 solid Buck Shots to be found in it, so expect for this title to pop up again in a future entry. The scene I have chosen is easily my favorite of the whole movie, when R.O.T.O.R. attacks the diner. The obvious cheapness displayed in this clip gives you a feel of the whole production. Things to pay attention to are the constantly looping synthetic music, the shiny bald eagle sticker on R.O.T.O.R.’s helmet and the cook’s painfully fake front teeth and country accent, perhaps the only sign that the movie was laughing at it self (or was it?) The best moment is of course when the super strong R.O.T.O.R. tries to attack a waitress, but is hindered by the featherweight tables. As she runs away, three “good ole boys” mosey on in, each of them prepared to take down the evil cop in their own fashion. The first guy is the ignorant redneck brawler, who sexually harasses the waitress as she panics in fear, then immediately tries slugging the Robot whom he addresses as a “Faggot city cop.” The second guy, surprisingly, knows karate”¦which of course is no match for the likes of the R.O.T.O.R. Then of course, the third dude steps up to the plate. He stands around 6 feet tall with a hair helmet and a 3 inch thick mustache. He proudly questions the R.O.T.O.R. “How about a real man now, asshole?” He then proceeds (I’m giggling as I type this) to rip off his pre-torn shirt, give a huge bicep flex display, then grabs the R.O.T.O.R. in the most sexually tensioned “are they going to make out?” manner possible. It’s quite the sight. Also, all of this is done in one master shot, only cutting away once”¦very artistic, almost documentary style (I will admit that the slow move-in shot on the Robot in the doorway is pretty bad ass, I’ll give them that.) I think that the slo-mo at the end of the clip works wonders here:


    That’s all for round 2…Thanks for reading!