FRED Entertainment

May 27, 2005

Trailer Park: SOUNDTRACKS

Filed under: Trailer Park — admin @ 7:27 pm

E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES By Christopher Stipp

May 27, 2005

SOUNDTRACKS

I can’t help but feel that my life was somehow worse before I heard The Dan Band.

These guys, one who looks like he should be working in a Wal-Mart Auto Center and two others who look like Elvis Costello’s younger sons, are some of the best re-interpreters of modern music that was definitely intended for women.

Some of you already know this, and I am now speaking to those of you who don’t, but in OLD SCHOOL The Dan Band were the really obnoxious wedding balladeers that had some choice elements to add into Bonnie Tyler’s “Total Eclipse of the Heart.” Big thanks to uber nerd Scott out there who corrected me that it wasn’t Laura Brannigan who sang the original. Thanks for pointing it out and be equally thankful you didn’t include your last name. Apart from all the swearing and obvious inculcation that followed to let you know, “Why yes, I do believe he did say that,” The Dan Band has made a rather pleasant CD that’s perfect for filler in-between serious studies of Dave Matthews as he rambles through one of his lazy guitar solos or the reasons why you can’t turn the dial as Gwen Stefani is spelling “B-A-N-A-N-A-S.”

One of the things that I like to make a point of here, though, is that music pervades movies. It’s sometimes a given that any time a protagonist is about to come to the final act of a very important kinesthetic act, be that a big game, project, or a life-altering test of will or sheer determination, you have to have a soundtrack driving it all. Growing up, I remember a lot of nice soundtracks to films. In GOONIES you had Cindy Lauper’s “Good Enough” as the young vagabond squad went in search of pirate treasure, you had “Rock Until You Drop” by Michael Sembello in MONSTER SQUAD (am I the only one that prays at the altar of the film that almost, but didn’t, quite launch the career of the boy who managed to wrestle away the acting wattage of Martika and Fergie from Kids Incorporated?), there was the rocking beat that drove the action in BACK TO THE BEACH with Annette Funicello and Fishbone in “Jamaica Ska,” the R&B funkiness of “Car Wash” and “Shake Your Tailfeather” from CAR WASH and THE BLUES BROTHERS, respectively, and, the one that cannot ever hope to be topped, “Happy” by Oingo Boingo at the beginning of SUMMER SCHOOL when all of our students get their pink slips.

Now, having hardly progressed in my maturity, I offer you, the humble masses, a true look at some of the best singles to come flying off a soundtrack into my collection of favorite soundtracks that I actually paid money for:

“Broken” by Belly, off the MALLRATS soundtrack. Many don’t know this about me but I am a savage Belly fan. I realize that takes me a few notches down on my Alpha Male Ratability Scale but the demise of this extremely delightful band provided good fodder when I went to write my first book. Plus, this was one of their last original songs to ever come out and this was really a swan song for me. Tanya Donelly is one of the nicest women I’ve ever met and I gush like an unrepentant fan boy whenever recounting the couple times when it happened.

“Confusion” by New Order, off the BLADE soundtrack. Besides the fatties in the house who don’t, but should, know better you can’t ask for a more appropriate adrenaline infusion when reaching the end of a workout. Works like a champ everytime and it makes me feel like breaking shit, it does.

“After The Flesh” by My Life With The Thrill Kill Cult, off the CROW soundtrack. Another one of those songs that hasn’t lost its currency in being able to pump a person up to the core. I can listen to it and block every nuance of Brandon Lee’s last major battle set piece. This one also can go under the Breaking Shit category.

The whole thing, REQUIEM FOR A DREAM soundtrack. Feel the need to get into a dark place but don’t feel like screwing with anything real in your life? Listen to this a few times and let it seep in and stain you like a raspberry Kool-Aid tongue stain. This soundtrack defines the word “haunting.”

“State of Love and Trust” by Pearl Jam, off the SINGLES soundtrack. Love it, hate it, or regret having consumed it, this song was rather ubiquitous with epitomizing the flashier moments of the alternative sound. I didn’t pick this soundtrack up until a few years ago when I felt secure that, yes, it’s ok to immensely love this Cameron Crowe flick and not have my tastes questioned; I even lent it out to a friend who had never seen it just this past week.

“There She Goes” by The Boo Radleys off the SO I MARRIED AN AXE MURDER soundtrack. The haters against this movie don’t sway my opinion that Anthony LaPaglia, Nancy Travis, and Alan Arkin really round out this funny rom-com in ways that keep me coming back for more. This song just puts me in the right frame of mind.

“Born Slippy” by Underworld, off the TRAINSPOTTING soundtrack. Not only is this a song that can get even the most comatose wallflower onto the rug to cut it up a little bit but it’s also one of the most memorable songs from the movie that I took my wife to see on our first date. (I really gambled on that choice, let me tell you)

“That Was the Day” by the the, off the THREESOME soundtrack. This is a great, lazy afternoon drive song and the song is catchy as all hell. I, seriously, also took a first date to see this movie. She never called after this night. I think the subject matter might have been a little too heady. It was either that or the amount of my junk that I had hanging out my pants. One or the other.

“Over and Done With” by The Proclaimers, off the BOTTLE ROCKET soundtrack. I hated “500 Miles” with such a vitriolic venomousness that I know I love this song dearly whenever I play this song off of Wes Anderson’s soundtrack. You can’t ever re-discover a movie like the first time but this song puts me in the right state of mind whenever it makes its way into my CD carousel.

This list is constantly evolving and if I have missed any ditties that you all think I’ve erroneously omitted toss me an email and let me know your favorites.

MALE SACK

Hey kids, it’s time for a quick letter I got at the Trailer Park Mail Depot, and thought to share it with you. Regarding my review of the new ZORRO trailer from last week, Alfred R. writes in the following observation:

“Dear Christopher:

I hate Zorro.

I hate him so much that I wish they could just burn the film and speak no more of it. When I was watching the first film, I was thinking “is it wrong to actually want the peasants to die?” and I’m mexican.”

And that’s all the time we have for this week at the Male Sack!

Please enjoy this week’s column with my compliments…


SKY HIGH (2005) Director: Mike Mitchell
Cast: Michael Angarano, Danielle Panabaker, Mary Elizabeth Winstead, Kurt Russell, Kelly Preston, Dave Foley, Kevin McDonald, Steven Strait
Release: July 29, 2005
Synopsis: Set in a world where superheroes are commonly known and accepted, young Will, the son of Commander Stronghold and Jetstream, tries to find a balance between being a normal teenager and an extraordinary being.
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Positive. Can someone out there answer one quick question for me? It won’t take more than just a moment, I promise: Did Kurt Russell sign a lifetime contract in blood with Disney? Did he slit his own aortic veins open and, in a glorious spouting of viscous red platelets, forever sign allegiance to the Mouse House? I mean, not that I care or anything, but I am just curious to know.

The short review on this trailer is that it looks the way it should. You have more exposition than is really necessary, shots of most any notable person in the flick, and you have Voiceover Guy helping to move things right along at a rather comfortable pace. It looks like the kind of safe family entertainment that many parents will make their cinematic pick for Movie Night. And, you see, that’s not a bad thing, and I am trying hard not to goof on that, but that’s as far as things go for this movie. I don’t even need a review of this movie to tell you that as soon as you are done watching this trailer you know pretty much every in and out of the plot, character, situation, crisis, and eventual ending to the movie. Again, not a bad thing, but it’s par for Disney’s style of marketing movies.

What should tip anyone off, and this is good for those of you who will ever have to take a test about identifying origins of films just based on seeing the opening 10 seconds, that this is a Disney movie is the idyllic suburban setting for the film. The tinkling of the happy piano and the exterior shot of a way too manicured front lawn, and the real unnatural bedroom stylings of a kid who’s about to go to high school is a dead giveaway. Plus, it’s the first morning of school and, judging by the lighting, it’s high noon with the morning glory wattage seeping in through the window. Where are the neighbors down the street who have friends that feel the need to honk their friggin’ horn every time they pass by the home? Where are the douche teenagers who like the sound of glass breaking and, thusly, shatter anything with a silica base on the blacktop just because it “sounds cool”? Nowhere in this Disney picture, that’s where.

Anyway, Kurt is all proud of his son who is starting his high school career at his old alma mater. What’s more is that when the kid gets on the ol’ cheese wagon the wackiness kicks into Ensue mode as the short bus turns into a rocket ship and blasts its way to a flying city of sorts. At first I think it’s a S.H.I.E.L.D carrier (high five to all the nerds in the house who know what I’m talking about) but when I see Lynda Carter acting in an administrative capacity I am hoping Kurt has done his boy right and is sending him off to stay with Wonder Woman and all her Amazon girlfriends. Again, I realize it’s Disney and tuck it back in.

The effects work of all the superhero kids who display their powers, especially after one of the sexaholic nerds pulls a Scott Baio ZAPPED! on some poor fraulien, is fun in a roustabout way and it’s kind of cheeky to see girls getting into the antagonizing act as well.

Bruce Campbell is as solid as ever in his stint as a high school coach of sorts as he determines if his young wards are either going to be superheroes or sidekicks. I dig that. On a kiddie level, that’s funny, and that would sell me on deciding to take my eight year old if I had one.

Of course, though, the son of Kurt doesn’t have any powers and is regulated to sidekick status and his parents play the part of concerned caretakers who look like they’re trying to deal with just finding out their boy likes other men. But, whatever, this is what superhero parents worry about, right? Kurt’s wry comment about dipping his son in a vat of toxic waste just to trigger some sort of power gets a PG laugh from me.

From here, and this has to be my favorite moment, we see that these kids at the high school participate in a HARRY POTTER game of widget, wicket or whatever the hell those wizard kids played. It’s played kids who have powers and those who don’t. The sport is all well and good but that isn’t the best part. Dave Foley and Kevin McDonald of Kids in the Hall fame appear as onlookers. I’m not shy about admitting to a man-crush on all things Foley so I hope his comedy in this film isn’t just limited to just a couple of lines and an extended cameo. The man is genuinely funny and I’d actually make my way to the video store to rent this just to see a little bit more from him. Now, having said this, the rest of the trailer just decides, “Aww, what the hell…Let me just show you the rest of this movie.”

And then you see the rest of this movie play itself out. The bad guys are clichéd bad, the bully in the high school is clichéd bully, and even the ending seems trite and hackneyed but this should be nothing compared to the amount of good, clean fun Disney has planned for the entire film.


A HISTORY OF VIOLENCE (2005) Director: David Cronenberg
Cast: Viggo Mortensen, Maria Bello, William Hurt, Ed Harris
Release: September 30, 2005
Synopsis: An average family is thrust into the spotlight after the father commits a seemingly self-defense murder at his diner.
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Positive. Want to know why I really didn’t like KISS OF DEATH?

Apart from David “My Middle Name Has Always Been “˜Awesome Career Moves'” Caruso’s problematic acting I just couldn’t take Samuel L. Jackson’s constant eye wiping. The way it was leaking, that hanky he used to sop up the tears, all of it, I just kept on getting that sympathetic response from my own eyes and I damn well didn’t appreciate it. Here, though, I think Ed Harris’ wicked eye problem won’t be much of an issue as long as nothing oozes out of it.

Now, SCANNER and THE FLY. Two great movies. I think with a pedigree like this from a long-standing director, and you open a trailer with an odd hold-up of a diner that ends rather heroically, we may actually have something going here. It’s like pouring a foundation and the purpose of getting the catalyzing thrust of the action out so swiftly only helps to keep people’s attention. However, it’s not very exciting, it’s not exactly gripping, but it simply does not waste time in getting to where things need to go in order to cram everything in and make it dramatic.

The deal is that Viggo runs an extremely clean diner in Whitesville, U.S.A and he’s about to close up for the night. A couple of really old hoods straight out of Deadwood come in and try to stick up the joint. After trying to reason with the gentlemen Viggo pulls a Brad from FAST TIMES, utilizing a Mr. Coffee in his plan of attack. I’m sure he was thinking, “Damn, I’m sure happy I paid attention to how Judge Reinhold got his wrist into it,” and promptly dispenses with the whoop ass. Even shoots a dude.

The town rejoices but (insert dramatic music) he has a secret.

Later, Ed Harris comes by, donning TERMINATOR 3 shades, to talk with Viggo a little bit.

On a side note, Harris oozes the kind of eeriness and hardcore manliness that makes me sit in awe of his prowess as a strong actor and, as he obviously has something to say about what Viggo did, you can sense Ed’s presence as an intimidator.

We’re led to believe that there’s shared history. When Ed, with his blind eye all milky and glassy from whatever impaled into his ocular cavity, casually asks Viggo’s wife, the so-so Maria Bello, why it seems that her husband is so good at killing people I get intrigued. In fact, the booming bass shot that punctuates the scene is perfect.

And the fact that the trailer people keep Voiceover Guy at arm’s length and just let things slowly burn out on its own is great. While not even close to being on any top 10 of mine of the year I am very impressed by the get-in, get-out and leave them wanting more attitude. They could’ve shown so much more and I appreciate the restraint shown in not doing so.


REVOLVER (2005) Director: Guy Ritchie
Cast: Jason Statham, Ray Liotta, Vincent Pastore
Release: September 14, 2005 (France)
Synopsis: Revolver is a Vegas-themed gangster film with characters named The Caddy, French Paul, Fat Dan, Howard The Indian, Johnny Walker and a guy named Dorothy. Several groups of individuals try to screw each other over for a lot of money. It’s the story of a hotshot gambler who becomes tangled in a game with deadly consequences.
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Positive. Jason Staham in a Guy Ritchie film? Really? How original.

I say this in jest only because I completely think that Jason has the unique ability to either dissolve into the background of a movie like SNATCH and has the power to bring it all forward if he has to step up in a lead like THE TRANSPORTER. I like both movies for what they are but Jason adds that star quality that you can’t really teach. But, you know, Guy Ritchie isn’t getting off as easy.

The guy can make a good gangster film. LOCK, STOCK AND TWO SMOKING BARRELS, SNATCH, and even his wee film, THE HIRE, bristles with Michael Bay-ian repetitiousness. You can look at this way: Guy Ritchie is like a good DH on a baseball team. The guy is never called up to do anything more than hit the ball. He’s not asked to play the field, he’s not asked to make great plays. His only job is to hit the ball the way he seems to know how to do. Guy Ritchie is that DH. I can’t honestly see any glimmers of talent that can extend beyond the British gangster flicks that he’s so fond of making.

And that’s fine by me because he is so good at it.

The trailer here is presented in a unique way that’s usually only reserved for foreign films: no one gets to say a word.

It’s all about the movement and direction of the characters of this film but, without knowing who is who, you don’t quite know if there’s a bad guy who you’re trying to root against or if this is one of those movies where no one is above reproach.

When the screen opens up and you see Big Pussy from The Sopranos you know, without even having to think about it, that this is going to be another one of Ritchie’s gangster movies. It’s like seeing someone who comes to visit every once in a while; whether you enjoy having that person come around is another matter entirely.

The metaphorical needle scratch comes right after this as we get an oddly indented quote about chess on the screen that lingers there all on its own. I mean, look at it. It’s like the quote was too damn small but they had to figure out a way to make it seem bigger. “Oh, I know what we can do,” Trailer Maker says, “We can just fill the top of the screen with the quote, leave a while lot of black space in-between, and then shove the name of the person who said it all the way down to the bottom like I’m trying to squeeze an extra pair of flip-flops into an already bursting piece of luggage.” “Brilliant” is the only answer that I assume came back. It’s jarring, though, to the eye.

Next scene is a bulb poppin’ flood of light. It’s a casino and as the camera pulls in quickly to a couple of people who are standing in front of it we see it’s none other than Ray Liotta. It’s always a pleasure to see that a guy in front of a camera. He was always meant to play in these kinds of movies, no doubt about that.

The guitar riff that rolls through the various cut scenes, one is a shot of Jason walking out in the middle of the rain outside of some correctional facility, thugs abound, a chess match plays itself out, some guy pops another, and some skuzzy ho dangles her taco, protected by some delicious pieces of white silkiness. The lollypop the lady sucks on is, I take it, some visual reference of how well she can pleasure a guy? I always think that about chicks who suggestively slob on some Charms Blow-Pop goodness but I’m fairly dense about these matters.

The other thing you’ll notice in the second half of this trailer is that this new movie from Ritchie seems a bit bloodier than recent productions. There is lots of it in the subsequent scenes of the many gunning downs that seem to be happening on the screen along with the number of guns that are brandished. There are a LOT of them and I am genuinely curious to know if the events in this picture are going to take place from across the pond or whether these guys are just good at getting armaments.

And that damn lollypop chick shows up again but, this time, her lollypop is gone, I wonder for a moment if she’s able to get to the Tootsie-Roll center of a Tootsie-Roll pop because she likes to felliate so many men. Just wondering.

I do, also, have to give up props to how this trailer ends. Two things: 1) When the guitar is wailing, showing us all the groovy money shots of the guns going off, and it just stops abruptly, with Ray walking away from the camera, his heels clicking off the hard floor with long taper candles flanking him, that’s money. I liked that. 2) The card that tells me that this movie isn’t coming to me until “Autumn” is funny. I don’t know why. My Americanisms limit that word to “Fall” and anything beyond that get just me thinking how much more formal that sounds. I like that too.


FOUR BROTHERS (2005) Director: John Singleton
Cast: Mark Wahlberg, Andre 3000, Ice Cube, Tyrese, Garrett Hedlund, Dax Ravina
Release: August 12, 2005
Synopsis: Four brothers look to avenge their mother’s death.
View Trailer:
* Medium (Windows Media, QuickTime)

Prognosis: Negative. Was this the same guy who did BOYZ N THE HOOD? If it is, indeed, the same guy I want to know what alien symbioyte invaded that man’s head and is currently preventing him from making quality films instead of this cookie cutter action flick.

I have high hopes for Singleton as a director and I couldn’t wait to see his newest directorial effort. I hear that Tyrese Gibson is in it and I say, alright, the guy did his thing in 2 FAST 2 FURIOUS: WE’RE SO FUCKIN’ FURIOUS THIS TIME. I hear Mark Wahlberg is in it and I give him the benefit of the doubt. I loved THREE KINGS but thought that ITALIAN JOB was just a showcase to display his ability to memorize some lines with such hollowness I wondered if it was the hypnotic lure of his well-built pectorals and well defined mid-section that got him the job. Then, I see it: Andre from Outkast. I give up. I’m sure he’s great and all but, damn, Andre was that powerful of an actor, who, by all accounts, is really a musician? I’m talking to every actor very seriously here like I would if I was that South African guy when he tied up Sgt. Murtah in LEATHL WEAPON 2 in those hushed tones: I would be going nuts. I would be going out of my head just thinking of how messed up things must be when the guy from “Hey Ya” gets a major supporting role while you’ve been busting your ass doing Shakespeare in the Park and shilling for Bank One in those Maximum Checking ads I keep seeing. It must suck.

Anyway, back to the trailer.

Things open up with a toast to an old lady. Mark, Tyrese, that “Hey Ya” guy, and some other white dude are giving praise to their adopted mom. They’re from “the street” but they got hearts as big as skyscrapers. It’s all very sweet. You get a white joke tossed in there for kicks, as you’ve got two brothers who are white, two who are black, and it’s all very sweet. Loving, you could say.

As we all know from Trailers 101, class, whenever you start a trailer with people smiling, you can expect that to be filled with something else after just a few moments.

Luckily, we don’t have to wait that long.

Ol’ mom’s gets popped in a convenience store (See??? A couple of weeks ago I told you my theory on convenience stores and the inherent evil of them and I am ashamed to see what I thought was a goofy theory just get played out by someone who I thought was a creative director.) and it’s here that I’d like to test the water for a reaction for an idea I have. What would all of you think if there was a concerted effort to see chicks bite it just as hard as guys do in films. Guys seem to be the only ones deserving of squib treatment and seeing this old woman get shot, off camera, raises an issue with me. I want to see that shotgun blast take her out along with some Big Grab sized Doritos and a display of Pepsi 12-packs. I call for equal treatment but I can understand if I’m the only one out there who thinks this.

Anyway, back to the trailer.

So, mom is shot dead and everyone has that filmic kind of scowl on their face. It’s that, “Eeee yar! I won’t rest until you’re avenged, mother!” along with, wouldn’t you know, one of those strident walks where everyone is walking in a long line and it’s all in slo-mo. Isn’t this also kind of hackneyed? I thought we goofed on it in SWINGERS and that was going to be the end of it? No? Ok, never mind.

So, the trailer shows our guys taking the law into their hands, acting all sorts of shot crap as they play Columbo and try to figure out, with steely bravado, whodunit. The language and speech with which these guys talk is rough to listen to without checking IMDB to make sure, absolutely positive, that John Singleton directed this movie.

Oh, and there’s some more laughter at the expense of the white actors in the film, so I appreciate that as well.

The rest after this is just more exposition about how these little detectives are going to figure out who killed their ma.

Now, I appreciate the effort to make a movie that is part whatever and part whatever else but I can’t watch a trailer like this and not feel that there is something seriously missing that would make me want to see this film. As it stands I just wouldn’t be able to recommend to anyone that this looks like an enjoyable night at the movies. It looks like a fairly good matinee but that’s about it.


2046 (2005) Director: Wong Kar-Wai
Cast: Tony Leung Chiu Wai, Li Gong, Takuya Kimura, Faye Wong, Ziyi Zhang
Release: April 23, 2005 (Tribeca)
Synopsis: He was a writer. He thought he wrote about the future but it really was the past. In his novel, a mysterious train left for 2046 every once in a while. Everyone who went there had the same intention…..to recapture their lost memories. It was said that in 2046, nothing ever changed. Nobody knew for sure if it was true, because nobody who went there had ever come back- except for one. He was there. He chose to leave. He wanted to change.
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Nervous. This trailer does a real disservice to itself.

The movie, ostensibly a sequel of sorts to IN THE MOOD FOR LOVE (one of my top 25 of all time), is about how two people collide with one another in a resplendent splash of requited and unrequited love.

What you see on the screen, though, doesn’t even come close to getting this across. You really do need to have some of these people talking to one another so we can get the point of what this film is all about. It starts off wonderfully enough, though.

You have a woman and man looking at each other in a dingy apartment hallway, longingly, as the narrative is right on track. You “get it,’ you know? These are two individuals who are more than likely going to hook up with one another. A card in-between shots rightfully states that this move won some awards. Best Actor and Actress at the Hong Kong Film Awards is a good way to establish that all-essential credibility people look for before investing in a foreign flick.

However, all that momentum is replaced with BLADE RUNNER.

The scenery changes, the mood shifts and we kind of get that it’s far in the future from when these people first met. We can get that much, thankfully, but there should most definitely be more than that. People need to feel that they can identify with these people on the screen but the trailer keeps us at arm’s length. Every person in this trailer looks despondent and we don’t know why.

We deserve to know what’s going on as the whole idea of a movie is to tell a story but what we get in return are people making out, and we don’t quite know who these people are as we’re “in the future” and the lightening isn’t helping me any with putting my fingers on who is who.

There’s a lot of making out, which I can appreciate and get excited over, and the effects are sublimely sad. I feel my mood sinking to these people’s level.

There’s a whole lot of people closing their eyes tightly as they toss their heads back, like they’ve just been kicked by a chimp in the nards, and a handful of artistic shots that start to stray into the realm of artistic expressionism which, if I could be so bold as to make a statement on, is not a good idea when trying to sell this movie to the greatest number of people. It goes to that area that’s best reserved for when you finally have people sitting in front of you, but that’s just me.

That all said, though, the lens through which all of this is being filtered is unadulterated joy. Wong Kar-Wei appears to have made a visual delight of a film that I know won’t be like BLADE RUNNER, won’t be too heavy on existentialism, although there will be some, and hopefully the smoky and slow style with which he directed IN THE MOOD will make its way into this newest chapter of love between two people who could never seem to take the step towards love that can finally be everlasting.

Trailer Park: BEST MOVIE I’VE SEEN ALL YEAR

Filed under: Trailer Park — admin @ 7:24 pm

E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES By Christopher Stipp

May 27, 2005

BEST MOVIE I’VE SEEN ALL YEAR

GEEK ALERT! Spoilers about STAR WARS about to follow”¦So run back down to your basement apartment and come back in a few paragraphs.

I was going to start off this week’s column with a point-by-point reason why I almost fell asleep during REVENGE OF THE SITH.

I had visions as soon as the credits rolled that I would write something that would explain, in ways that would be more astute than “it sucked,” why I didn’t feel a single thing by the end of the movie.

Good for George that he managed to rake in all that cash for a film that essentially is a computer generated eye-candy land with nothing more underneath the surface than some homosocial examination of one man’s weak will, which was damn close to the plot to both sequels to THE MATRIX., and the relationship between two dudes where “master” is uttered a whole lot. And that’s a big point to bring up here: (SPOILER ALERT) why the hell does everything about Anakin’s transformation hinge on believing some old coot about being able to save his wife by using the dark side; and what an inglorious death that was, too. She’s all sorts of splayed out on the birthing table with her legs up in the air and goes out with a whimper. How convenient she was able to look as good as she did, and be as calm as she was when she rattled off Luke’s and Leia’s names, without the usual human trappings of placenta, oozing blood, screaming, and the oft heard phrases of “Holy shi#!”, “Good Goddamn!”, “That’s wicked hardcore!” from our two interlopers who conveniently weren’t allowed viewing access to the canal that ends all canals.

And don’t even mention dialogue. I would’ve stabbed myself in the ear with my straw if I wasn’t already using it to guzzle down more Diet Pepsi down my gullet in hopes of staving off my wandering mind. Really, and seriously, I liked the original trilogy because of the story, because of the way they spoke, because of the way it felt. When Han Solo asks “How are you?” in that voice that he hopes, but knows is futile, will prevent an onslaught of Storm Troopers, I believe him. Harrison Ford sold me on his character, Luke sold me on his and everyone else, even Billy “Colt 45″ Dee Williams, did their share with bringing a reality to this seemingly improbable future. Now, though, it seems it’s more about adding too much reality through effects to this improbable future. And could someone tell me why the hue couldn’t have been taken down a notch during the saber battles? My eyes were trying to see expressions, reactions but, instead, all I got was hyperkinetic phalluses that were uncontrollably and wildly whizzing every which direction. I needed a shot of Dramamine just to keep my inner ear in check.

There is so much more I’d like to write but I so have to stop this impromptu review in order to recommend everyone see the movie that helped to wash out the taste of SITH: UNLEASHED.

Many of you know, or don’t, or don’t care, that I am not a fan of using superlatives whenever necessary. Words like “most,” “greatest,” “best,” and so forth are usually reserved for things that hit me just right. I can’t explain it but for a recent example of this came to me a couple of months ago when I saw the trailer for NIGHTWATCH. It’s still the best trailer I’ve seen this year. Now, when I saw UNLEASHED I felt that exact same way when the trailer rolled out onto the Internets (thank you, Will Wheaton, for making it fun to use that word). I saw something in Jet Li that I had never seen before and I wondered if it was just great editing or if there was something behind the mystery of how this film flew underneath many people’s radar.

UNLEASHED is the best movie I’ve seen in 2005.

Without a doubt, question or argument I can tell you that for fans of Jet Li who are hoping this movie shows us that he has what it takes to act and kick a crack or two I can tell you I have never seen something like this out of him. There is a vulnerability to this seeming monster of the midway when the movie opens up and it just goes on and on like this, as you wait for crap to go south and turn into a Blockbuster direct-to-video special, but you understand quickly that things will stay the course as you are treated to a flick that sticks to your ribs like oatmeal long after the credits dissolve.

I wish I could’ve told you all this before the movie came out (thanks, Rogue Pictures, for returning my calls. “˜Preciate it.) but I went on my own dime literally right after STAR WARS and I will be honest when I say if you have a choice, go see UNLEASHED. Jet Li has never before wowed me with his prowess to be so furious and angry but revert to someone so fragile and sensitive in the same picture. The man is wonderful to watch on the screen as he rediscovers his past, makes sense of his present and future, before confronting, and he confronts it with arms and legs blazing, that which wants him to revert back to the way he was. What’s more is the direction and cinematography. The respect that that’s accorded to the fight scenes and the level of attention paid to establishing a mood and place is unrivaled compared to what I’ve seen this year. And who can shove aside the peeps that did the score to this film: Massive Attack. The music fits in like a magazine slides into a pistol. It’s the pitch perfect marriage of understanding the nature of the film but not yielding musical honors to what’s the flavor du jour in hip hop.

I implore you, before this turns into a knob slob on the entire film, if you value action entertainment and nothing’s really “done it” for you lately, pay a little money and give this one a chance. I would go far as putting a Richard Roeper, IN AMERICA, money-back guarantee on this statement but since most of you make more than I do all I can do is to recommend it and hope that you have the sense to trick your loved one, who barely knows who Jet li is, into seeing this. The movie has compassion, depth, characterization, and just the right amount of human damage.


THE MAN (2005) Director: Les Mayfielde
Cast: Samuel L. Jackson, Eugene Levy, Luke Goss, Miguel Ferrer, Anthony Mackie
Release: September 9, 2005
Synopsis: Federal Agent Derrick Vann (Jackson) walks the walk, while affable dental supply salesman Andy Fidler (Levy) talks and talks in the odd couple action comedy The Man. A case of mistaken identity forces the mismatched duo to team up and sets off an intense and hilarious adventure as they speed through the streets of Detroit to pull off a sting operation and solve the murder of Vann’s former partner. Along the way, they uncover much more than they could have ever anticipated.
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Holy Crap, It Can’t Get Any More Negative Than This. As things began I hoped for something other than something incredibly unbelievable with Samuel L. Jackson playing the clichéd hard ass with Eugene Levy playing the incredibly white, and racially inept embodiment, sidekick.

I am wrong on both accounts as Voiceover Guy gets right to it by letting us know that Sam Jackson just lost a partner on the night of a big gun cache heist. Jackson’s all tough with his hair all mused with a big scar on his lid to show how smooth he is as an undercover cop. The thing is these undercover cops never look like dudes who should be undercover cops. They’re always looking like Hollywood envisionings of what an undercover cops should be but, whatever, right, this is the movies, who gives a crap? Fair enough.

Now, these weapons that were stolen in some part by some Eurotrash looking playboy, and, again I wonder, what is with this horrendous characterization? Look up any recent story on arms dealers and I can bet you that none of them look like Aryan demigods that women would easily slide open for, like a good looking gynecologist, oh no. But, again, who cares, as Eugene is “mistaken” for someone who has inside knowledge about what happened with these weapons as the comedy starts rolling in from the hills from there.

Um, yeah, so Eugene is eventually cleared as someone who was involved in masterminding the big plot but he is somehow roped into helping Jackson find out who IS behind it all. Things devolve quickly from here as Eugene protests helping the cops out in this sensitive police manner to which Jackson shoots Eugene in the ass as he tries to run away from the whole situation. Huh? How is this supposed to be amusing? Some dude gets caught up in a case of mistaken identity and he gets to be someone’s bitch? Oh, and let’s not forget that a few scenes later show Eugene getting released from the trunk of Jackson’s car for whatever zany reason the screenwriters have come up with as to why Eugene deserved to be placed in there in the first place. I bet it’s wacky!

And yeah, as KC and the Sunshine Band strikes up with that Vanilla Ice favorite (I still have that cassette somewhere, too.) “Play That Funky Music” I am loathe to see how horribly Eugene attempts to set race relations back with his “characterization” of an inept white person because, as we all know from movies like BRINGING DOWN THE HOUSE (which also starred an inept white guy who doesn’t know shit about black culture in the form of, whada know, Eugene Levy), white people wouldn’t be able to live in a major metropolitan area without the help of keen, street-wise folk.

Anyway, against all my better intentions I hope everyone sees this movie and makes it successful like every other stereotypical yarn of this breed. It will do well because no one cares about what makes sense but only what looks “zany” and what seems to have the sheen of commercials that star midgets or apes or half naked chicks who get wet at the sight of an overweight everyman who knows that Keystone Light is the king of all beers.

So, get to it, America. Vote with your dollars. Let the studios know you want more of these kinds of movies. I sure would appreciate seeing more of these trailers.


NOVEMBER (2005) Director: Greg Harrison
Cast: Courteney Cox, James LeGros, Michael Ealy, Nora Dunn, Anne Archer
Release: July 22, 2005
Synopsis: After a dinner out, photographer Sophie Jacobs (Cox) and her boyfriend Hugh (Le Gros) stop at a corner store for a late night snack. While Sophie waits unaware in the car, Hugh is murdered in a violent robbery. Haunted by guilt, Sophie goes on with her life as best she can: teaching photography at a local art college, meeting her mother (Archer) for lunch, and visiting her therapist (Dunn). But one day at school, a slide mysteriously appears in the projector’s carousel: an image of what looks like her car in front of the corner store the night of the shooting. Are these paranoid visions stemming from her grief and guilt, or does someone know something about the murder?
As her investigation deepens, more strange events start to occur, drawing into question exactly what happened the night of Hugh’s death. As Sophie struggles with her memory of that night, her life becomes like a photograph itself, an image refracted through a lens, with as much outside the frame as in. NOVEMBER is a psychological thriller exploring a woman’s struggle to transcend trauma through a surreal blend of emotion and memory. The narrative and visual style are comprised of dreamlike moments and images stemming from Sophie’s subjective experience, blurring the line between reality and the unconscious.

View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Begrudgingly Positive. “There is so much life in you and so much”¦emotional larceny in all these others”¦”

Sorry, but when I see James LeGros speaking his first words to Kyra Sedgwick from SINGLES this is the first thing I think of and, most likely, will always think of from here on out.

What we have here, though, isn’t what it seems at first.

You get a poppy reggae organ in the background as James and Courtney Cox are driving home from a wonderful evening on the town. He’s kinda creeping me out with the way he is totally turned to her as she’s driving, with thoughts of sexual deviation probably bounding from every synapse, and they end up stopping in front of a quickie mart. The exchange goes on way way too long as Cox orders her man inside the “˜mart to get her something with chocolate.

It’s a New York minute before our boy hops to and gets the hell out of the car and, just as he does, you hear the indomitable and unmistakable sound of an event that is about to head south very quick. The change in mood approaches forcefully like an oncoming cloud bank.

And, while I have everyone’s attention, why is it that really bad stuff always happens in a quickie mart? If there is one plot device what screenwriters use more often than starting a movie with someone waking up in their bed is that the quickie mart is a place for bad shit to go down. Take your pick of any movie from REGARDING HENRY, BLUE STREAK, GROSSE POINTE BLANK, THE REF, and on and on, I could list movies all day. Damn, makes me want to avoid one like it did the ocean after I saw JAWS.

Anyway, her dude is shot in the quickie mart, big surprise, but things take an interesting turn as we get the word that this film was an official selection at Sundance, Los Angeles, Seattle and many other festivals and it presents this information in a very delicate way. So, thumbs up for that. I like knowing this is the kind of story that has some appeal to others; I’m confident in my own likes but it’s so much easier when you get the approval of some people you can trust.

The editing even gets creative as the camera blurs out, some visual media pieces are tossed in, as it jars everything slightly, creating and evoking a mood that’s very discombobulating. I like it.

Courtney lies on a hardwood floor, looking up, distant.

Nora Dunn returns to the silver screen as a serious therapist as she talks to Courtney in a dark room, which I don’t quite understand as to why that’s really necessary to proactive mental healing, but we get the impression that the shooting has jarred her sensibilities to the point of a full-on scramble.

She’s an art teacher. At one point she’s back in a dark room where she’s using a projector to comment on a student’s project. A slide comes on the screen and it’s the outside of the quickie mart the night her dude was gunned down. Oooo! How spooky!

The trailer starts to quicken from here on out as her old memories of ol’ Andy trying to get his mack on with his little lady start to conflate with new information regarding the shooting.

The editing gets quicker and more chaotic as, I think, we are being led to believe that Courtney is either not all there or that there is something about this murder that she may know but isn’t letting on.

Can I take Courtney Cox serious as a dramatic actress? Has the decade long pummeling of her behavioral and un-funny retardedness with the rest of the anti-intellectual goon squad numbed every fiber of my being? Almost, but, in her defense, she does have hints that she’s trying and that does count for something with regard to a low-budget outing like this.


SAVING FACE(2005) Director: Alice Wu
Cast: Michelle Krusiec, Joan Chen, Lynn Chen
Release: May 27, 2005
Synopsis: For 28-year old New Yorker Wilhelmina “Wil” Pang (Michelle Krusiec), life is a juggling act between a promising career as a surgeon and her responsibilities as a dutiful daughter. Like the #7 train she takes to visit her Chinese family on a weekly basis, Wil is perpetually in transit between two worlds. The expectations of the Flushing, Queens society she is from and the desires that alienate her from it have made Wil content to live below the surface — even if it means playing an inadvertent game of charades with her widowed mother (Joan Chen) and the old world Ma represents. The masquerade is comic even in its pain as Wil tolerates Ma’s weekly set ups with eligible Chinese-American boys at the Friday Chinese socials; but it quickly becomes a farce when Ma’s mask cracks first.
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Positive. While at the Key Art awards a couple weeks back I remember Don LaFontaine saying that there really should be room for more people in the voiceover business and that encompassed having more women in this game.

I never really thought this was an issue until I heard the Voiceover Woman for this trailer. It’s odd to hear. My ear felt jarred by the switch-out. Although, it fits right in with the mood of this story and I see why they went with it.

That being said, though, it should be noted that since this is advertising and you’re trying to reach as wide an audience as you can you risk alienating causal males who may or may not want to see the film. It doesn’t matter, I think, as the mere mention of a movie that only really stars women will get the Chick Flick label no matter what.

For me, because I am really in touch with my femme side, I really want to see this movie. The story that unfolds quickly from the first frame is presented wonderfully and even though it doesn’t give away all the nuances of where the story is going to end you still get the idea that this will be a film that will be filled with substance and you really couldn’t demand any more from your lesbian/Asian/mother-daughter/absent father genre movies.

The trailer opens delicately with a run rising over a waking city.

You have two stunning ladies talking about how they met. One of the women can’t believe she hasn’t met the other one until now (they look like they’re in their late twenties) but she is reminded that they, indeed, had met once. It was back when they were children. There is instant chemistry synergizing between the two of them and you quickly realize it’s because they’re in love with one another.

Will, one of the ladies, has come out to her mother about her love for her partner and you can tell this relationship is one where one is proud to be a lesbian while the other has some issues of dealing with her public displays of Sapphic love. Not that 50% of the world would have any issue with it (insert rim shot here) but you can tell there is some inner friction.

The story progresses in this trailer as we are shown examples of how one of the girls’ parents, her mother to be exact, doesn’t want to believe her daughter is a lesbian and tries to keep setting her up on dates with dudes; she intentionally sabotages every attempt. Now, had this been the entire story, woman struggling with her own sexuality and how she makes her mother understand she likes the beav and hates the meat, I would’ve done a Men on Film “Hated it” and moved right on. But this trailer surprises me.

Her disaffected mother comes to her daughter’s doorstep and essentially lets her know that she’s pregnant. What’s a daughter to do?

The resulting moving in of the mother and the really nice silence that’s employed in the trailer when her daughter, girlfriend, and her are all sitting having dinner together in her daughter’s place screams volumes. When the mother asks her daughter’s girlfriend if she has a boyfriend, oblivious but not really, the story starts to metamorphose into something else entirely.

This becomes a movie about how a daughter tries to get her own mother back on the romantic track in finding someone who will appreciate her and, hopefully, get her on solid ground.

The ubiquitous cut scenes of her mother going on blind dates with dudes who are obviously not right for her is a bit hokey but the premise is still solidly kept afloat.

The ending for the trailer is bittersweet and humorous but if I had any main issues is that the music is wretchedly weak and I am not left with anything really solid to hang onto as my last impression.

The Asian American experience with regard to issues of homosexuality and having to deal with a rigid matriarchal support system is one, and I am going on a limb to declare this, hasn’t really been dealt with before.

This movie looks to tackle a lot of issues and I only hope it doesn’t treat them lightly. For me, because I am really in touch with my femme side, I really want to see this movie. The story that unfolds quickly from the first frame is presented wonderfully and even though it doesn’t give away all the nuances of where the story is going to end you still get the idea that this will be a film that will be filled with substance and you really couldn’t demand any more from your lesbian/Asian/mother-daughter/absent father genre movies.


FLIGHTPLAN (2005) Director: Robert Schwentke
Cast: Jodie Foster, Peter Sarsgaard, Sean Bean, Erika Christensen
Release: September 23, 2005
Synopsis: Flying at 40,000 feet in a cavernous, state-of-the-art 474 aircraft, Kyle Pratt (Foster) faces every mother’s worst nightmare when her six year-old daughter, Julia, vanishes without a trace mid-flight from Berlin to New York. Already emotionally devastated by the unexpected death of her husband, Kyle desperately struggles to prove her sanity to the disbelieving flight crew and passengers while facing the very real possibility that she may be losing her mind. While neither Captain Rich (Bean), nor Air Marshal Gene Carson (Sarsgaard) want to doubt the bereaved widow, all evidence indicates that her daughter was never on board resulting in paranoia and doubt among the passengers and crew of the plane. Finding herself desperately alone, Kyle can only rely on her own wits to solve the mystery and save her daughter.
View Trailer:
* Medium (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Apathetic. You know what, for a while the MSN network had a corner on the exclusive trailer for FLIGHTPLAN.

Now, I think it’s absolutely pants that I had to sit through a dammed Listerine commercial before being able to watch the preview for Jodie Foster’s latest flick. Crap holes, the lot of them. I had to sit through that Listerine commercial where you’ve got that guy who looks like Matt LeBlanc’s younger brother who’s all “look at me swishing this stuff between my cheeks!” I didn’t need new mouthwash as I don’t use the stuff but, even if I did, I wouldn’t buy a product that’s being shilled by some guy that looks like he’s swishing around man juice between his molars. Buttheads.

Now, where was I?

Oh yes, Jodie Foster has been absent from American audiences who haven’t yet checked out A LONG ENGAGEMENT, which you should because it’s awesome and I’m telling you it is and you should believe me, but she’s back in a role, through no fault of her own, that makes me think this is PANIC ROOM at 37,000 feet.

For those who don’t want to fully read the description of the flick it’s easy for me to break down: mom designs huge ass plane, takes her daughter aboard it, they’re flying home to New York at night, they grab their seats, take a nap and when Jodie wakes up for some reason or another the kid is gone. She tells someone they tell her she never brought the kid on in the first place and the race is on to either find her or to get an air Marshall to Tazer her hysterical butt before she makes a go at the cockpit doors.

The scroll that runs at the bottom of the trailer as it’s telling you the first part of this is rather lame and you’d think they could be more creative than using Word 2003 but whatever. This isn’t my campaign.

So, when Jodie wakes up, finds her kid has been missing, the hubbub she makes is slightly freaky as the story starts to play with our minds, trying to think if she really is making this whole story up or if there is something else going on, but when someone makes the comment that they’ve received word that her daughter died 6 days prior almost seal any notion that there might be something more to the story.

I am uplifted, though, by Sean Bean. I am still holding out for a Sean Bean, Vinnie Jones Ultimate Marvel Team-Up as Sean is always good to have in your corner when it comes to people losing tempers which he looks close to doing in this one. The man exudes that kind of ass-kicking vibe that he could go off at any moment. Also, there are guns, a few of them, along with some explosions as Jodie goes wild like some crazed Mr. Peepers as she scourers the innards of the plane for evidence of her daughter’s existence. I’m not sure what exactly she hopes to find as all points seem to finger the direction of her being a wacky loon job.

I do hope she gets Tazered at some point, though.


GEORGE ROMERO’S LAND OF THE DEAD (2005) Director: George A. Romero
Cast: Simon Baker, John Leguizamo, Dennis Hopper, Asia Argento, Robert Joy
Release: June 24, 2005
Synopsis: In this new tale, Romero creates a harrowing vision of a modern-day world where the walking dead roam an uninhabited wasteland and the living try to lead “normal” lives behind the walls of a fortified city. A new society has been built by a handful of enterprising, ruthless opportunists, who live in the towers of a skyscraper, high above the hard-scrabble existence on the streets below. But outside the city walls, an army of the dead is evolving. Inside, anarchy is on the rise. With the very survival of the city at stake, a group of hardened mercenaries is called into action to protect the living from an army of the dead.
View Trailer:
* Various (Windows Media, QuickTime)

Prognosis: Positive. Damn do I love a good zombie movie.

If I could recommend a good viewing position for this trailer I would have go with the Mackenzie brothers’ advice before they screened their film, which I believe was shot in 3-B: So sit back and get some corn, and let’s have..uh..it’s movie time.

With an audio sample from the original NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD which still gets me every time “I’m going to get you Barbara” and a real moody, dark presentation we are hitting the proverbial ground running, er, slowly sauntering while moaning in this case, by using video clips that bring us all up to speed with what’s happened since we last left George. Night turned to dawn, then night became dawn, dawn became day (two thumbs up for the double and literal entendre) and the screen goes black and silent.

It’s great. Perfect.

I’m thrown backward as a zombie head comes up off a glassy pond in the middle of the night as hard rocking A chords, and quick editing do the rest.

We’re not really sure where the plot is at this point, how things began or brought us to be or why Dennis Hopper has arisen from his own catatonic state of major motion picture making but no worries as we get lots of zombie action and some sweet weaponry to fight off this new pack of the undead.

Now, the vehicles these peeps are using do look a lot like the ones utilized in DAWN OF THE DEAD, last year’s version, but who the hell cares when you have George Romero at the helm of this fast moving ship. The entire story seems to take place at night, upping the scare factor in any movie, and there does seem to be a localization of where the narrative will unfold.

Again, since the only person who talks in this thing is Dennis, who announces his displeasure for Zombies, it’s a wonder why he makes this joke. Is he somehow involved with this new breed of brain eaters or is this somehow tied in with the zombie mythos? Who cares, I say, as it’s been too long since George’s last foray into the genre that has bred so many imitators that I hope this one school’s them all in the form of how not just to do it well, but how to do it right.

May 20, 2005

Trailer Park: THIS IS NOT THE ARTICLE YOU’RE LOOKING FOR

Filed under: Trailer Park — admin @ 7:24 pm

E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES By Christopher Stipp

May 20, 2005

THIS IS NOT THE ARTICLE YOU’RE LOOKING FOR

Don LaFontaine was on NPR last weekend.

Now, apart from being a hardcore and dedicated NPR freak (Hey, Michele Norris and Melissa Block of All Things Considered, when you Google your names and find me why don’t you give me a shout out? I am available whenever you are”¦) I was listening to Wait, Wait, Don’t Tell Me on Chicago Public Radio (anyone going to be in Chicago with me this weekend for the Cubs vs. Sox game at Wrigley?) and who should I hear is a guest on their show but none other than Mr. Don LaFontaine.

Now, the Key Art Awards were a splendid time. Don did some amusing short videos that spoofed on those Real Men of Genius ads but what I thought that the spots lacked was a genuine spirit of funniness. They just weren’t. The freshness date on those kinds of jokes expired about six months ago but I don’t hold that against anyone involved in the production of them. They just missed the mark.

What did make me laugh, though, was what Don did last weekend on WWDTM. The interview was solid and gave people who didn’t know who the Voice of God was a better insight into what made someone think that the starting words “In a world”¦” was a good idea. And then it happened. Don was asked to spice up some common phraseology on NPR that are so often lampooned by others when they discuss how stale that station is. He just ran with going right into rephrasing some of the most milquetoast lines in his own way that, with Don’s spice, I couldn’t help but to wonder why I didn’t see a glimmer of this when he received his lifetime achievement award. I don’t know why these two moments of Don’s front and center presentations converged the way they did in the last two weeks but it is one thing to get recognition for what you’ve best been known for and give the kind of speech that barely registers on the titter-o-meter but there is just something about giving in to the frivolity of what you do for a living that makes for better entertainment. Don is fascinating to listen to and I only wish I could’ve seen that a couple of weeks ago when I sat in his presence.

Now, what I wish I could’ve seen less in the last few weeks is the serial pimping of STAR WARS. I don’t even need to bring up what episode number this is and I really don’t need to go into the particulars but, really, when Darth Vader is pimping Pizza Hut, Pepsi, Burger King, Slurpees, M&M’s, phone ring tones, a multitude of other consumer consumables there is something slightly askew with the filmmaking process. What does this kind of movie marketing say about the product, the ultimate product, the film, when you have such obvious campaigning like this? Rather than let that rhetorical question just linger there (Remember, kids, never end any argument in a rhetorical fashion. Always, always, always, answer it.) I’ll answer it for you: the STAR WARS franchise is just that. I’ve been wondering so long, hopeful, about what could’ve been for this last episode, that I actually thought this last installment could redeem the last two films but I know better even before I see the movie. Lucas himself has stated what a cash cow this thing has been but his shameless exploitation of the property isn’t so much a display the work of a madman but a very smart, informed, and intelligent businessperson.

STAR WARS is just a tool for money generation. That’s it. That’s all it will ever be from here until Lucas finally dies.

If you were to chart the marketing tools, DVD’s, special editions, and anything else relating to the franchise you can will see a movie maker that is shrewdly in-tune with what people will pay to see and devour than what people will be moved by. The thing is I’m not making any value judgments against the man, far from it. It’s his own machination, his own “vision” and he’s free to do whatever he wants with his films but I guess I was just holding out hope that this last of the films would mean something more than a specialty ice cream at my local Baskin Robbins.

I’m sure the film will be an enjoyable romp at the theater. I’m positive that the visuals will be sure to stun and that the dialogue will be rough on the ears. It’s this kind of movie, the last STAR WARS, that reminds me that there is nothing that this movie will do that hasn’t already been done by better films. There isn’t going to be any transcendence that hasn’t already been executed by better screenwriters, better directors. There isn’t anything in this film that will be able to satisfy the years of wonderment that I have formed myself after following this saga since I was a boy. There isn’t anything that Pizza Hut can serve me that can fill the void left by the deflation of hope as it’s replaced by the reality of what this property really is and is not. It is a means to a fiscal end and those who were hoping for a film that was built with altruistic passion will hopefully see what I haven’t for the past few decades.

Welcome to show business, right? I say good for Lucas. He deserves every nickel you’re willing to part with and, when he gets mine this weekend, I do hope it’s, at the very least, a thrill ride I’d want to revisit time and time again.

And lastly today, I have to give it up for Tim Jones, a reader out there who is in a deranged barbershop quartet of sorts that, well, sings the STAR WARS theme song, with words, as one of their bits. I listened to it, it’s funny, and it’s just the right thing to listen to as some of you get ready to see this film again for what might be your 3rd or 4th time before Saturday.

I know some of you were the ones I saw on the local news show on Thursday morning as every reporter were out in force to showcase the hard core geeks who had already seen the movie at midnight but who were back for more the same morning. My nerd cap salutes all of you. Even though you’re quite derided by many I couldn’t help but feel something fuzzy about the kind of dedication some of you people have. Maybe it was the stairmaster that was causing the fuzziness but I was moved nonetheless.


IT’S ALL GONE PETE TONG (2005) Director: Michael Dowse
Cast: Paul Kaye, Mike Wilmot, Beatriz Batarda, Kate Magowan, Pete Tong
Release: April 29, 2005 (LA)
Synopsis: Its All Gone Pete Tong is a comedy following the tragic life of legendary Frankie Wilde. The story takes us through Frankie’s life from one of the best DJ’s alive, through subsequent battle with a hearing disorder, culminating in his mysterious disappearance from the scene. A genius in his own right, he clawed his way to the top of the DJ ranks, now living the opulent life of a superstar, he resides in his trophy villa in Ibiza with his trophy wife. This is when tragedy hits. Born with a hearing disorder he is rapidly going deaf with only one functioning ear to complete the new Ibiza season. How is he doing behind the decks? Horrible. How is he doing in the studio where he produces his remixes? Frankie dives into a low period, struggling with deafness in utter depression. After a year of locking himself away he emerges on the other side with a fresh attitude towards his affliction. He accepts his deafness and learns to function without sound. Will Frankie make it back to the DJ booth? Will his new single be any good? Will he get back his opulent old life or does he even want it back? When you can’t hear, things look very different.
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)
Prognosis: Odd. I’m going to review this thing like I was Bo Diddley in TRADING PLACES; to paraphrase the long and short of it this movie is just not my thing.

It starts off like it’s going to be a very interesting bio-pic of sorts.

The static of a record loops over and over with the words “”¦I don’t know where he is”¦” slowly echoed in blackness.

You get interview, documentary, style footage of people speculating where this once prominent DJ is about whom this movie is based. It’s intriguing, sure, as a character portrait of someone who was immensely popular and then, literally, dropped off the human radar with no trace.

The filmic portion of our film comes from Paul Kaye, playing the part of our lost DJ in question, Frankie Wilde, who starts party people up by spinning some beats. We’re treated to various forms of adulation this man was given for his work inside indoor clubs to outdoor events. Interposed with the fictional portrayal of Wilde are more interviews from people who knew him, worked with him or were inspired by him. I’ll admit that I was intrigued by the premise of this movie and can’t tell if Wilde was a real person of this is all just improvised.

Next, as there is always an element of substance abuse in any effective Behind the Music-style of story, we’re shown his decent into drug addiction. From licking hallucinatory toads to just abusing his body we come to the portion of the film where it starts with the words, “”¦and then it was gone.”

Wilde is standing on a majestic mountainside, somewhere very warm and expensive looking, and is cupping his hands over his ears as he screams out to no one. We’re given a few different angles of “The Scream.” It leads us to the quote that pretty much tells us how this process of self-destruction speeds up.

“There’s not much you can do as a DJ if you can’t hear.”

Wilde is shown tearing his world apart, destroyed by his inability to communicate in the way he was best known for doing. He was useless as a DJ. He was useless to everyone or so it seems.

The interview footage speculates on what this deafness drove him to do. Is he really just a record clerk in some store in the middle of nowhere? Did he kill himself? Is he even still around?

Even though we don’t get any answers there is a really poignant moment where Wilde is sitting in a restaurant where a woman, Spanish perhaps, dances to a classical guitar solo. She’s wearing a vibrantly red dress and holds part of it up as her legs start to move. Her thick black dancing shoes rap tap tap, rap tap tap, rap tap tap on a hardwood floor. There’s something in the vibrations he can feel that transcend auditory sensations (kind of like that one episode of Quantum Leap where Sam is “Rod the Bod” and he finds this hot deaf girl who uses bass from a speaker to help her dance and he really digs her but he doesn’t know sign language but he wants to because you know he wants to hit that like it was 1999) and you can see it in Wilde’s eyes that there is something there that he can respond to. It’s a wonderful trailer moment that’s pure and speaks for everyone who hasn’t done so already.

The trailer eventually just trails off into a heavy mix of snippets and scenes but that’s what you’d expect to see out of a movie about a DJ whose life was all about BPM’s and getting people up to let them get down. Again, it’s probably a good pseudo bio-pic but it’s just not my thing.


MANDERLAY (2005) Director: Lars von Trier
Cast: Bryce Dallas Howard, Isaach De Bankolé, Willem Dafoe, Danny Glover
Release: May 16, 2005 (Cannes)
Synopsis: A story of slavery, set in the 1930s American South.
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)
Prognosis: Positive. Has anyone seen THE FIVE OBSTRUCTIONS? For your sake I’ll only go as so far as to say that it has to be some of the most interesting filmmaking I’ve seen in a long time. Now, I’ll only go as so short, and curt, to say that it’s also obnoxious, obsequious, and some of the most pompous presentation of circumstances that do nothing to further my own sense of narrative storytelling or filmmaking.

Now that’s out of the way, I see MANDERLAY, a title I thought would show me an insight to Las Vegas showgirls, via some Dogme movie making technique, that would show just how seedy that town is and finally give me a good reason to plan a trip but was sadly let down when I realized I didn’t read correctly. This film is an important piece in Trier’s trilogy of sorts that really began with DOGVILLE.

This piece here, set yet again in America, stars Willem Dafoe, Danny Glover (Good to see he’s making a concerted effort to come back into the cinematic fold) and everyone’s favorite nepotistic IT girl for the moment, Bryce Dallas Howard. The context is the 1930’s and the exact geographical location is a bit ambiguous but it’s stated that it is the South.

A foreigner cobbling together a racially based film, one that will no doubt raise the cackles of Mama’s Family U.S.A., shouldn’t be that much of a hot button, right? The trailer, though, is very good at capturing what the rest of the world already knows about our past. As simple as it sounds, this installment of Trier’s insight into human nature around the 3rd decade of the 20th century eases us gently into exactly what’s happening. There is no ambiguity and I appreciate its straightforwardness.

There is an orchestral string movement that paces the action of this trailer and it opens up on the small, physically, plot of land where all the action takes place. Yes, it looks like a stage production at some moments just like in DOGVILLE but when Willem enters the scene as the wealthy white guy, riding in style, while black people are depicted hurling cotton bails into the back of a truck as they labor away, you can feel the powder keg that’s being packed.

The subsequent narration of the events that transpire in this film talks about our main characters. The slave system in all its hideous glory is given context by introducing us to our cast. Unfortunately, even though it’s effective in lighting the wick all on its own without anything more elaborate, the word “nigger” is used to describe all of the black characters and I can’t imagine this trailer will ever be seen on PAX TV. The word is pejoratively used, obviously, to show the kind of environment everyone exists in and, ostensibly, to let everyone in the audience know that this isn’t going to be a very feel-good experience.

What’s odd is that all of our players are given numbers. These numbers correspond, according to the narrator, to the person’s personality. I don’t know the real meaning behind it but when it’s stated that this number system was used to keep a psychological grip on the slaves that our heroine, Bryce Dallas Howard, is going to come save the day on her own I am at the same time not impressed nor have any belief that a pale and hot looking white cracka’ like her is going to be anything else but a target for the white rage that will no doubt erupt when she tries to upset the status quo of the land.


SERENITY (2005) Director: Joss Whedon
Cast: Nathan Fillion, Gina Torres, Alan Tudyk, Morena Baccarin, Adam Baldwin
Release: September 30, 2005
Synopsis: The feature-length adaptation of Joss Whedon’s TV show “Firefly”, set five hundred years in the future, aboard Serenity, a transport ship captained by Capt. Malcolm “Mal” Reynolds.
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)
Prognosis: Positive. I’ve never watched an episode of Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

I wouldn’t be caught so much as flipping past Angel on my way to watch a Cubs game on a Sunday afternoon.

I’ve never watched, or had an interest, in checking out Firefly.

But if you got a movie with that dude from MY BODYGUARD (man, the way he bitch slapped Matt Dillion is the true stuff of movie magic”¦) and D.C. CAB (the touchstone of my youth that taught me that Mr. T deserved more acting roles and that it is possible to get a fire going in one’s home with a flamethrower) I am all in. It’s been forever since I’ve seen Adam Baldwin and he looks really engaged with this material. It’d be hard not to be as the one thing I do consume of Joss’ is his take on the X-Men franchise. God bless that man for that and it allows me to understand what this guy is doing with the script.

Now, keeping in mind I’d rather click over to C-Span if an Andromeda or an X-Files episode comes on, I am pretty engaged with this trailer from the very first moment. The spaceship that is carrying our mixed crew in the opening sequence (is it the same one from the series?) looks like one of those Ertl model jobbies I used to find at KB Toys as a little kid; you know, those bulbous white shoebox looking thingies that had various antennae sticking up and seemed awfully ill-designed for space travel but were sold as space ships.

It’s alright, though, as it somehow piques my interest in what’s happening off-screen as we get the captain’s subdued, but still bombastic, in that captain sort of way, speech about how everyone’s come aboard for different reasons but now’s the time to, well, just suffice to say that he’s getting everyone ready for a fight of intergalactic, interplanetary, Beastie Boy, proportions. Cheesy as it may be I am sure someone gets all goosey when they hear him say that.

The effects are what really get me. They’re really well done. Even though there’s no air in space and you can’t really hear explosions, and that anything that blows up would implode, I’m fine with putting that aside for some good space battling.

The lines here are also pretty heavy handed. “I’m taking your sister under my protection,” and the way our captain inflects that line, makes me laugh and roll my eyes, but the subsequent crash landing effect using a very real shot of some rural American location more than makes up for it. The juxtaposition is welcomed.

“Whoa,” I yell, and I do yell “whoa,” as a crispy looking zombie pops up for a wee second on the screen, our captain with a pistol at his side does an Indiana Jones hip shot and takes it out.

We get a Wesley Snipes/Blade guy with a sword that seems to be in pursuit of the previously mentioned girl because there is something obviously up with her. This is just made more apparent during the sound stage kung-fu demo she gives us as she moves and gives carefully blocked martial arts ass kickings. Again, it looks choreographed by Bob Fosse but whatever.

What I do have a problem with, though, is the written fellatio heaped upon Whedon’s work on this movie and past endeavors. Yeah, he’s great as a writer, no doubt about it, even not having ever seen a Buffy or Firefly episode, the man is demand I get that but, slow the pole smoking a little.

You get my positive vote but turn that volume down a notch.


JIMINY GLICK IN LA LA WOOD (2005) Director: Vadim Jean
Cast: Martin Short, Jan Hooks, Linda Cardellini, Janeane Garofalo, John Michael Higgins Elizabeth Perkins
Release: May 6, 2005 (Limited); Soon to be playing at a dollar theater near you
Synopsis: “La La Wood” follows the legacy of Jiminy Glick (Martin Short in a fat suit), first introduced on “The Martin Short Show,” who went on to get (non)-critical acclaim for his talk show “Primetime Glick,” where Mr. Glick interviewed countless celebrities (which usually ended in verbally–sometimes physically–insulting/assaulting them). Now comes “La La Wood”–Jiminy Glick’s home. This is his story (sort of).
View Trailer:
* Medium (Various)
Prognosis: Negative Was this really necessary? Really. I mean it.

In the annals of moviedom I would imagine other properties out there could be made better use out of than this wholly useless film. Here’s my sincere mea culpa about how it pains me to kick this a little: I like Martin Short. Big fan of his work in INNERSPACE and his first stint in FATHER OF THE BRIDE and Glick is a fairly amusing sideshow act in small doses but this is the whole bottle compared to a sip or two.

When this trailer begins, selling itself in a wholly different way, one of those “Gotcha!” things that studios are so fond of doing for some reason, you think that this could be a horror movie of some kind.

“Beyond your deepest fears”¦”

I mean you have some knife wielding woman walking down a dark hallway, ready to slice and dice, and you have throaty Voiceover Guy doing his best to be all creepy with the tense wood instruments flailing in the background. The joke that’s supposed to make all of us guffaw is that the biggest terror in Hollywood is Glick. Get it? Yeah, stupid, I’m sure Joe Bob Montana will think, “Man, I done thought it was goin’ be “˜orror movie. Dem suits sure is smarter than me.” Smart one, Chief.

So, it seems that Glick is going to the Toronto Film Festival. He’s starry eyed, and says so a few times before he actually makes it to the red carpet where he’s knocked over by a horde of women who run to get Brad Pitt’s autograph. Now, Brad is nowhere to be seen, the women are obviously not clotheslining Glick, which would be funnier than all get out, but there’s nothing genuinely slapstick-y about the pratfall. The only real display of what Martin Short is known for with this character, making asinine comments or asking questions that don’t even come near home plate, doesn’t even clock in until the trailer is nearly half way done. That’s not smart, that’s just plain ignorant.

My spirits rise a bit with none other than Pat “Leave a Horny Message at the Beep”¦Allegedly” O’Brien as he makes a faux Hollywood Insider report on Glick being catapulted to media fame from obscurity; it’s was like seeing O.J. Simpson after his run-in with the law when watching NAKED GUN. The rest after this, though, just doesn’t evoke any laughs whatsoever. I’m not trying to be callous but, damn, it’s just not funny. There’s even a Scooby-Doo style mystery sub-plot that’s hinted at but I’m not sure I get what is happening as I’m too enthralled with trying to wonder how much it cost to make this film and how it will do in the secondary market.

I do have to say, though, that seeing John Michael Higgins in this was like finding a life preserver on a burning ship; I’m not so sure he’ll be able to do anything with what’s given to him but John is an actor that I wouldn’t mind seeing week in and week out doing informercials or playing the part of a recurring attorney in the on-again, off-again series Arrested Development. The man is just good.

As for the trailer? I can’t find anything worth salvageable. If this were a record review I would have to put this entry into the “Recommended only to fans” and even then I would probably write the article under a pen name.


THE DUKES OF HAZZARD (2005) Director: Jay Chandrasekhar
Cast: Seann William Scott, Johnny Knoxville, Jessica Simpson, Burt Reynolds, Willie Nelson, David Koechner
Release: August 5 2005
Synopsis: Cousins Bo (Scott) and Luke (Knoxville) Duke, with a little help from their cousin Daisy (Simpson) and Uncle Jesse (Willie Nelson), egg on the authorities of Hazzard County, Boss Hogg and Sheriff Coltrane.
View Trailer:
* Medium (Windows Media, QuickTime)
Prognosis: Positive. It’s tough, but understandably so, to be a U2 fan as of late.

It’s en vogue to be a hater against a band that has so obviously and completely “sold-out” and no longer makes the kind of music that really elevated them to rock star status back when Joshua Tree was huge; those bitches have really given it to all of us since then with their arena tours and iPods. People engender a kind of myopic definition of purism when it comes to explaining what makes a true rock band and I, for one, don’t understand a note of it.

I say fuck-all to that.

People want rock stars to be larger than life. Fans want someone to give them a show, to give them something worth paying their money to come out and see, and people, ultimately, want their rock stars to be nothing more than entertainers but somehow they want their rock stars to be gaunt, emo-self-loathing paragons who would eschew stardom and all it’s trappings. However, critics need to take their spotlight of shame and direct it at talentless, here-today-gone-yesterday, preening and vacuous bitches of corporate manufactured music and leave the contemporary masters of public ceremony alone. It’s not enough that Rob Thomas of Matchbox 20 is still selling CDs to a willing public who celebrates mediocrity like it’s manifest destiny but yet there’s something inherently wrong to keep a gravy train chugging after more than 25 years.

That’s a long way around of trying to say that DUKES OF HAZZARD looks like big fun the movies, isn’t it?

Yeah, I have to admit it: this is a really nice trailer for a summer movie and among all the people who will rally against it I was one of those voices until I saw this trailer. I’m usually wrong about these things but I feel alone, again, in my support for a film that’s looking at an uphill battle.

Things start off on the right foot as the “countdown” beings. Throaty Voiceover Guy booms in with a serious tone as he comments that the countdown is beginning for the movie event of the summer; we all know how facetious that comment is but its purpose lays in the way the countdown begins at 05 and works its way down to, yup, 01, in all its orange glory.

That at least shows a little creativity if nothing else; thank god that’s not all.

The “yee-haw” that blares out of the screen as the General Lee clears a long ravine takes me back to Seann William Scott’s last car clearing, ROAD TRIP, but its obvious here when the car doesn’t blow up a few seconds after it crashes into the ground that we’re in a whole new realm of physical probabilities. (Translation for those residents of Macon County, Alabama: The car ain’t done blown up af’er it should’ve went up like a ro-man candle; he-haw, git “˜er done!) And that’s fine because the car sequences look fabulously executed. Not only that but we oddly saved from any more voiceover work and are treated to a nice musical interlude, a little Southern rock to get the feet a-tappin’, and it’s much appreciated because we, the viewer, can watch some of the car work that this movie will revolve around.

Jessica Simpson’s introduction, even though I am not a fan of that blonde Barbie who may or may not be as dumb as she appears and acts, is actually not entirely disruptive.

After we get that she’s going to be an empowered member of the Duke threesome, we get the very classic theme song of the old TV show and get more stunts. And that’s what really this movie should be about, you know? Nothing but car chasing and some old school Burt Reynolds SMOKEY AND THE BANDIT moves with a dash of T&A that the children really like nowadays. As the song is playing the graphics on the screen introducing everyone is a nice touch as well, a wink to the standard way our guys came to us every week on CBS. It’s cheesy, grainy and looks put together by 1st year film editors, but with a kind of irony that really works.

Problems? Yeah, a few. When Scott and Knoxville open their mouths there are few old and busted things that come drooling out. Like when Scott makes a “shrimp on the barbie” joke when introduced to an Australian hottie I immediately think back to DUMB AND DUMBER. Boss Hog walks into the screen, pimped out in the old school creamy white suit, resplendent in the form of Burt Reynolds himself, at one point offers up a C-note to anyone who can knock out some perp in a jail cell, which is also holding Bo and Luke Duke, who is taunting Hog. What’s really funny is the delivery of some anonymous goon as he immediately clocks the guy out. The goon who does the hitting rushes to the bars to say, “Don’t you you’re not supposed to wear white after Labor Day?” in a way that’s oddly appropriate and funny.

It’s dumb, stupid, but I loved the tone and delivery of the joke. And that’s why, people, when I see that Jay Chandrasekhar, one of the main minds behind SUPER TROOPERS and CLUB DREAD, might be making appreciators out of haters.

Might.

May 13, 2005

Trailer Park: DOES THE CARPET MATCH THE CURTAINS?

Filed under: Trailer Park — admin @ 7:23 pm

E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES By Christopher Stipp

May 13, 2005

DOES THE CARPET MATCH THE CURTAINS?

It really wasn’t that it was raining, it waning as I drove ever closer, and it wasn’t even so much the LA traffic, as I was tangled in a rush hour blaze of wet red taillights, but it was that I had zero clue what I was going to ask the celebs on the red carpet for Hollywood Reporter’s 34th Annual Key Art Awards.

There was a bit of mystery involved with not only who was going to show up to this showcase of the best in movie advertising, which includes everything from trailers, TV spots, DVD ads, posters, even best DVD packaging design (give it up to the wicked hardcore Japanese quadrology for ALIENS who easily trounced the competition with their Alien bust), but as Del O’Griffith said in PLANES, TRAINS AND AUTOMOBILES, you’ve just got to go with the flow.

So I did.

For those two or three of you out there who have never “worked” a red carpet I have to be honest and tell you that it really is exciting. I mean, there is nothing else in the world that comes close to the crank-like high when you see a parade of pretty people (really pretty) as celebrities slowly saunter for the delight of snapping cameras, strolling smoothly to reporter to reporter answering their questions. As I fiddled with my own black tie, and I have to be honest, I was looking totally and completely pimp, dashing through the parking garage on my way to the Kodak Theater’s lobby where cameras, flood lights and a wide expanse of red velvety rope that separated the pretty’s from the press.

I had my own little space on the carpet. The temptation to caress it and protect my little space like it was a defenseless newborn was only tempered by my realization I was a representative of Poop Shoot.com and needed to make I was on my best behavior. I looked at the ground, where it was all demarcated for who was to stand where, and felt a sense of entitlement. Ahh, yes, this is what it’s all about; working hard, catching a lucky break when your editor-in-chief can’t make the gig and I could, making sure I had my P’s and Q’s all ready to lay at the feet for the woman who made it all possible (unyielding thanks and gratitude go out to Lynda Miller of the Hollywood Reporter), and, above all else, making sure I had extra batteries for my digital recorder. You know, just in case.

So believe the hype. Getting ready to interview a gamut of very important people, with cameras shuttering behind your ear, is deliciously intoxicating. Although, I think that may have been due in some part to Missi Pyle who I didn’t get to actually talk to but donned an aroma that was equal parts lilac, perfume and sensuality. There wasn’t a chance in hell I was going to try and even carry on a civil conversation.

With those I did talk to, though, all were really kind in humoring me by answering a few questions on their way in. John Cho deserves some love for being the most into the vibe I was pushing out and responded with some great answers and, believe it or not, Oren Aviv, President of Buena Vista Pictures Marketing, was by far the most charming of the group. The man, an executive who least exudes the stereotype, was a sheer delight to talk to if, for no other reason, than he completely looked me in the eye the entire time I talked to him. I think for some people that might be a little intimidating but it at least made me feel that he was genuinely listening to what I had to say.

Golf clap for all those who took the time to say hey.

OREN AVIV

How is Kevin?

Kevin is doing great. He was actually doing some things for his MALLRATS 10TH anniversary DVD when I saw him in his comic book store yesterday.

He’s so funny, he’s so friendly.

Have you had a chance to work with him?

No I haven’t. I met him”¦I actually introduced myself to him at some party I was at years ago but I am a fan of his.

Well, I wanted to say congratulations, first of all, on all the nominations given to THE INCREDIBLES.

Thank you.

I’ll tell you, where I write, on Kevin’s site, all I do is review trailers. That’s it.

Is that right?

It’s all I do. Week after week.

That’s what you do? For a living? Wow. (Note to self: 1) Try and think about it later of whether that wow was a surprised “wow” or a “gee, what a loser” kind of “wow.” 2) Rethink place in grand scheme of things)

I see 15 to 20 a week and I just write paragraphs on them.

See any of ours?

Yeah, INCREDIBLES was near the top of my list last year and I just did a great review for HOWL’S MOVING CASTLE.

That’s good.

Which I think looks unbelievable.

I love the move. The movie’s great.

Have you seen it all?

Yup. It’s pretty special.

Do you find that it may be, and not so much a difficulty, but that it might be hard to sell people”¦

Oh yeah, it’s a tough sell but that’s alright because we have a lot of tough sells. I mean THE INCREDIBLES isn’t in that category of tough sells but that’s ok because we expect those. That’s our job. It’s what we do.

What do you find is the most satisfying part of what you do?

I’m gonna say that the best part of what I do is when we first look at a cut or an assembly and there’s a moment with every campaign where it just clicks into place about how we can do it, how we can sell it.

A movie like HITCHIKER’S GUIDE, a very tough sell. That movie, easily, could’ve opened at 7 or 8 million dollars. Small, culty, eccentric, quirky film but when you figure out, how to do it, that’s incredibly satisfying. And, of course, if you do well on opening weekend. It’s one thing to think you can figure it out but the public are really the ones who vote with their dollars. If you do it right, and get lucky, it’s a great feeling.

And do you judge success by opening weekend? HITCHIKER’S GUIDE did open at number one. Some tepid response by fans notwithstanding”¦

I measure success by how well we open. Other people have their own measurements but for us it’s very simple. We get graded, there’s a scorecard, every weekend we open a movie, where it’s either pass/fail.

What’s the direction now, animation wise, with Pixar having left? Is there any”¦

We have a spectacularly funny movie coming out, CHICKEN LITTLE, that comes out in November which I think is just great. I think it’s going to surprise a lot of people.

Really? Zach Braff”¦

Yup. The voice talent is great but the animation looks spectacular and it’s hilarious. So, hopefully, we’ve got our fingers crossed and we’ll see what happens.

Do you think that marketing films will be changing this year? With computers and the Internet making bigger inroads into how people get their information”¦

It’s constantly changing. I think that the danger is that if you ever assume that you’ve got it figured out you’re screwed. If you assume that none of it makes sense and you’ve got to keep trying and you’ve got to keep pushing then you’re gonna win. So, that’s kind of our attitude with us.

Well, thank you, I don’t want to take any more of your time. I appreciate it.

Thank you, very much.

SARAH SILVERMAN

Ahh, Movie Poop Shoot, didn’t they do a really nice review of JESUS?

(I had no idea but mad props and a free steak on me to whoever the hell it was because it made things go so swimmingly after that”¦)

I think we did (having no fucking clue if we did but sounding very confident in affirming the love we must’ve poured on it). Hi, I’m Chris. (Extend hand, grasp hers, not too firm though, and toss out that Don Juan smile you already married stud you”¦)

Hi, Chris.

Pleasure to meet you. When is JESUS IS MAGIC coming out?

Well, Interscope is negotiating with the distributor now so hopefully it will all work out now but at this point it is all out of my hands which is a bit horrifying but hopefully in the fall.

This is your second year here and the awards show is all about publicity, all about trailers, have you seen anything good lately? Are you disappointed if you get a crap batch of trailers before a film?

I love the trailers.

No, I’m never disappointed because that gives me an opportunity to make a fart noise which ALWAYS kills. But I do love the trailers. I never want to be late for a movie.

You know, my friends will say “It doesn’t really begin for 20 minutes” but, hey, that’s the best part. I do like trailers.

And what have you been up to lately?

Well, besides JESUS IS MAGIC there is the ARISTOCRATS and RENT. The movie version of RENT.

(Some top secret bomb is dropped, accidentally, and thus cuts short the coverage. Many apologies.)

JOHN CHO

Hey, Chris, from Movie Poop Shoot. Kevin Smith’s Movie Poop Shoot. (This latter approach, I found, worked better than shouting out the word Poop in an already noisy corridor”¦)

How you doing?

Good.

Loved the movie, HAROLD AND KUMAR, loved the marketing campaign…Whose idea was it to say, “that Asian guy from the AMERICAN PIE movies”?

I do not know but it worked.

It worked fabulously.

It worked but I wasn’t a big fan of it initially.

Really?

It was what they were looking for.

Obviously not a fan of it because it was drawing attention to something obvious”¦?

Oh, no no no.

I was hesitant at first because I didn’t want to hear”¦it seemed repetitive. Asian guy, AMERICAN PIE.

It’s one of those things where you don’t like to be known as the Asian guy. I’m sure the black guy doesn’t want to be known as THE black guy from something.

But, it was all in good humor and I felt that one of the good things about it was like a mind reading trailer. It was said everything you were thinking as soon as you thought it.

So, how do you feel about its success? I know I was at the Comi-Con last year”¦

Ah yes”¦

When you and Kal Penn came out and were really working it. Do you find that kind of marketing is necessary for that kind of demographic that a film like HAROLD AND KUMAR skews toward? Maybe there are things a studio will ask you to do for marketing purposes”¦

They asked us what we were willing to do and, in this case, we really believed in the movie and said, “Listen, send us out.” Sometimes you’ll say, “Not so much.” But in this case I really believed in this movie and it was one were going to have to work extra hard to get people to come to. So I said, “We’ll do anything you like.” And I personally enjoyed it because I thought it was in the spirit of the movie. All the things we did, including building a White Castle here on Sunset. I thought it was appropriate.

It might not have been right for SOPHIE’S CHOICE but, for HAROLD AND KUMAR, very very appropriate.

Ok, good, last question”¦

Oh, I’m a Gemini.

(Laughs but I quickly assess whether or not I’d hit it. After all he is funny, successful”¦) Sunday is Mother’s Day. What was the best advice your mother ever gave you?

Ohh”¦

Maybe even bad advice”¦

My mother always tells me, always tells me, “Take the higher paying job.”

I could tell her, “Hey, you know what, I could sell-out and not starve but”¦” She always tells me to take the higher paying job. It’s been about 50/50 that I’ve chosen between the two. That’s her thing.

Well, John, thank you. Thank you very much.

Pleasure to talk to you.

KEVIN NEALON

Hi, Kevin, my name is Christopher, I work for Kevin Smith’s Movie Poop Shoot (Man, I am so getting this introducing myself thing down to a science”¦) So, advertising. Do you ever feel rooked if you get some bad trailers at a movie? Are you a fan of the trailer format?

I am a fan of the trailers themselves. Lot of times after I see the trailers I just think, “Well, I don’t have to see the movie.” Because, if that’s the best they can show us then it’s not very good.

The first date is a lot like a movie trailer. You give the other person an idea of what the relationship is going to be like and you only show the good stuff. And you hope to pique their interest so they come back and you can see the whole package.

Ever feel upset when you’ve been tricked by a trailer that’s made you come back only to”¦

Yeah, oh yeah. I’ll be sitting there thinking, “Yeah, this is great but what about that car chase from the trailer? What happened to the T&A from the trailer?”

So what brought you out tonight? How did they pick you”¦

Well, they came to me and asked me to host the show and I was in town this week, I thought it would be fun and so here I am.

And what’s on the horizon for you? I heard there was a new show.

It’s a show called Weeds, a series for Showtime, starting in August. It’s starring Elizabeth Perkins, Mary-Louise Parker and myself. Mary-Louise plays a soccer mom who loses her husband in an accident and, in an attempt to make ends meet, she resorts to selling pot.

And I play her accountant, I’m on the city counsel, and I happen to launder her drug money for her.

Now is this going to be played seriously or is it comedic?

Well, it’s dark but it’s got a comedic twist to it.

Thanks for talking to me and, since it’s Mother’s Day time, what was the best advice your mother gave you?

Best advice was to show up and, you know, I don’t think I ever got bad advice from her. Yeah, I lucked out.

Kevin, thank you so much. I appreciate it.

It was about this time that I was ushered into the main seating area only to have acidic flashbacks from last year when Ryall wrote most eloquently when he was part of last year’s festivities and was treated most Richard Roundtree-like as the shaft sent him to the echelons of the upper mezzanine. I was happy as a clam, getting everything I needed out of my interview subjects but I had no idea what was about to follow.

My 2nd row seating on the announcer’s side let me know that his public shaming of the ticket givers from last year worked to great effect and I humbly reaped the benefit of that. (Note to self: buy Chris’ first round of tequila shooters at Comi-Con in San Diego) I tell you what, honestly, I was out of my gourd just taking in the majesty of the whole production, reviewing every line in my head from Ryall’s account of last year’s show and waiting for something equally as offensive, ribald, saucy and indignant.

I think I was booked into the PG version of DEEP THROAT because there was nary a curse word to be found.

Kevin Nealon came out, dropped the same trailer joke, verbatim, as he did with me on the red carpet and proceeded to take the slow, leisurely route to get where this ship was going. He brought out some of the good old SNL stand-bys, couched in the vibe for the event, as Mr. Subliminal peeked his head out for a few laughs and even his review of some of the “screeners” he was asked to look at before the show was amusing.

“The next movie I was asked to look at, THE ASS AND THE FURIOIUS, was pretty good. I started out interested, sorta interested, somewhat interested, very interested, very interested, very interested, VERY interested, VERY interested, then, not so interested.”

His hosting was serviceable, you know? I can’t say a bad thing about the guy’s ability to keep things at an even keel but there also wasn’t a whole lot of pizzazz, either. There wasn’t anything very exciting about safe and tame jokes. I was led to believe there was going to be serious comedy but as soon as Sarah Silverman graced the stage and gave a sharply contrasted presentation compared to last years’ one I just had to believe that this was going to be as good as it got for the in-flight entertainment. Her comment that when she stole the standee for TOP GUN back in the 80’s wasn’t because she was in love with Tom Cruise”¦it was because of it’s rounded edges. The thought alone was worth every penny getting there.

Of the winners, though, THE INCREDIBLES, no surprise, took home many awards for its marketing efforts and as well as it should. The commercials were good, the trailers were funnier than all get-out, and you could see a lot went into making that movie one of the best marketed movies of 2005.

One of the more vile winners of the night was winner of best theater standee: THE SPONGEBOB SQUAREPANTS MOVIE. What the hell was so awesome about a perfectly square, yellow piece of cardboard? I call bullshiat on that one and I demand that I get to vote next year on some of the better made pieces of cinematic bric-a-brac that so often has those little white slips of paper taped on the back of them as you pass them by on your way to your film, the words SAVE FOR calling dibs on something that looks so natural in a theater lobby but yet looks so heinous and freakish when it’s displayed in a home.

And would you believe there is actually a category called Best Home Entertainment Under :30? Yeah, it’s for TV spots that only run :30 or less. NAPOLEON DYNAMITE won in case any of you were keeping score.

Of all the highlights of the night, and there were two, I cannot express to you the oddity of seeing Voiceover Guy live and in-person. Actually it was a handful of guys and they control pretty much most all the voice talent in the industry. Many of them were brought out on stage to announce some of the award categories before announcing the winners and it was perhaps the oddest thing I’ve ever seen. It was truly like looking behind the green door as now I have faces to place against for what has been a very visage-less critique of these guys who rule the roost of these promotional pieces. It was at once reverential and fascinating to me see these men employ their throats in very specific ways. Utterly fascinating. Even the man of the hour who received a lifetime achievement award, a Mr. Don LaFontaine, is a rather interesting cat. 26 voiceover sessions in one day is Don’s personal best and someone told me that, at the rate he was getting paid, many thousands per session, that man rakes in more before noon than most any executive out there sees all year.

The other highlight was seeing the nominees for best action trailer. I know I brought this up months ago but it was DAWN OF THE DEAD that won. I couldn’t have been more thrilled as the lights went out after its win so as to show everyone else in the house what makes a scary ass trailer rock so hard. I wish I could be dramatic by saying how much in awe everyone was at the end of the trailer’s showing but it’s the truth. The silent pause right before the clapping started in, as the zombies break through the 4th wall in end when they start scratching at the “screen” was unreal. If people could’ve collectively said something at that point it would’ve been, “We’ve got nothin.'” That trailer is still one of my favorites and it’s an absolutely egregious oversight that the trailer was left off the DVD release. There’s no need for that kind of ignorance, people, and I can’t yet understand why it was kicked to the curb in favor of some real shoddy supplemental material.

With that, and the Best-In-Show honors going to the trailer for SIDEWAYS, “Huh?” I believe was my reaction, my escort for the night preemptively whisked me away quickly to get situated at the after-party as he said that the hundreds of other wolves who would be following us would gobble up the free food and booze that was offered in short order.

I loaded up on a margarita (oh how I wish I would’ve thought to double-fist it) and three plates of food. I was set like Santa with a few platefuls of cookies. This was also my first introduction into the world of sea bass, hey, it was free, and I can’t express the sorrow I felt about not having ever tried this once in my 29 years on this planet.

Now, at about here I could go into great detail about the after-party. However, since I met a great many people who work in the industry and talked to me about the more rakish and petty crap that goes into movie marketing, most of my night was spent “off-the-record.” It was a wonderful thing to be trusted so completely by people who barely knew me but to listen to the trials and tribulations of people who are really at the beck and call of executives who assume to know more than they do is to listen to the kinds of problems most of us all share on some level in our professional lives. These men who I got to talk to, and they were mostly all men, had stories that were at once unbelievable and hilarious as you listen to what happens when you not only have too many chefs trying to tell each other what to do but what happens when those chefs want to be able and take credit for your labors.

My gratitude goes out to those who did confer with me, letting me genuinely flatter those who I found out made some of the very trailers I’ve reviewed here in this column in the past year and a half, and made me feel a part of what really does seem like a very close knit, if only speaking in social terms, sub-sect of the Hollywood movie making machine.

And to my escort who should know that his talents have made a lot of fanboys happy. I could tell you all why and what that is but it’s so much better to just let you all enjoy the seemingly simplicity of it all without bringing reality into it. His talents continue to shine with every high profile job.

This Bud’s for you”¦

And, very special thanks to Lynda Miller from the Hollywood Reporter who helped me secure my first spot on the red carpet. I appreciate being able to benefit from my editors’ misfortune.


BATMAN BEGINS (2005) Director: Christopher Nolan
Cast: Christian Bale, Michael Caine, Liam Neeson, Katie Holmes, Gary Oldman, Cillian Murphy, Tom Wilkinson, Rutger Hauer, Ken Watanabe, Morgan Freeman
Release: June 17, 2005
Synopsis: BATMAN BEGINS explores the origins of the Batman legend and the Dark Knight’s emergence as a force for good in Gotham. In the wake of his parents’ murder, disillusioned industrial heir Bruce Wayne (Christian Bale) travels the world seeking the means to fight injustice and turn fear against those who prey on the fearful. He returns to Gotham and unveils his alter-ego: Batman, a masked crusader who uses his strength, intellect and an array of high tech deceptions to fight the sinister forces that threaten the city.
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)
Prognosis: Positive. Now this is Batman done right.

One of the best compliments I can bestow on a trailer like this is that it doesn’t use Voiceover Guy and it doesn’t rely on cards to set up exactly what we’re looking at.; things are just allowed to coalesce naturally.

Also, the trailer utilizes Nolan’s script as Liam Neeson’s near whisper narration brings us to one point, that one intersection in Bruce Wayne’s life, where the costume became the joi de vie of his whole being.

I like the bat dissolve of the WB logo in the beginning which almost seems ironic since it’s been a long goodnight in a cave since that company decided to do something smart with the franchise but you can now can see why. The direction of this movie appears to be handled with such delicate confidence that you half wonder why it has taken this long to get the Batman movie made which everyone said needed to be done.

We see young Bruce falling down a well, finding that cave where those little bats dwelled and struck fear into his young boy’s heart, cutting to him standing over his dead parents, to the now ubiquitous Sherpa shot as he quests for knowledge of where his life is going.

The sweeping views and vistas of this far-off place where Bruce trained to use his body and mind as a weapon is captured beautifully in the scenes chosen. Michael Caine breathes life into the new Alfred incarnation; he exudes the caring, confident, yet subordinate, role as his butler and there really does seem like there is a believable history between these two men.

I find enjoyment of Bale rolling up, after his eventual decision to shower, shave and come back to Gotham, in a big pimp daddy mobile which shows us the true playboy that Bruce Wayne was. This was something that was overlooked or glazed over in previous episodes, I believe, and I like he has some arm candy to show that he is Master Bruce, King of All Poon. He is young, rich and I like that there’s some shallowness that’s being put on display.

As an aside, this could be something or it could be nothing but if this is supposed to be Gotham then why is he driving a car with Illinois plates? Freeze it in QuickTime. I did and think it’s hilarious. That license plate is from Illinois. Holla, Chi-town! Now, it could be that Bruce just likes to take advantage of the tax benefits of plating his cars out-of-state but I just find it amusing.

His subsequent bump into Katie Holmes is a nice touch and, again, something that wasn’t explored in any of the other trailers. Bruce is vulnerable and this is the moment that speaks volumes. When Val Kilmer and Nicole Kidman were paired up in the previous Batman incarnation I didn’t really believe the sparks that were artificially created between those two flint rocks. Here, though, you believe that these are two people who really do have a past with one another.

Seeing how this is a summer tent pole after all and that Batman needs to get his Batgear- on before he gets his groove-on we need weaponry. Lots of it. Morgan Freeman comes to our rescue as the resident creative weapon expert. He’s doesn’t look as good as Michael Pollard in TANGO AND CASH but he’ll do as he shows Christian all the neat toys he’s going to have at his disposal.

I am especially drooley at the sight of the new Batmobile. That thing is an outback nightmare that I am sure will have lots to do in the streets of Chicago, er, Gotham. The quick clips of it working live and in action make me believe that there was a reason behind its chunky design.

Right after the car is shown, and this but a small thing, Christian is standing with his eyes closed in a very dark spot as hundreds of bats race by his face and person. I can only imagine the dry cleaning bills to get that bat shit off his clothes and shoes. Also, and I knew my nature channel watching would pay off in some nerdy way someday, what about all that crap that sits in that cave? I hope there’s a good ventilation system down there.

One word, five syllables, Bruce: Histoplasmosis. You should be less worried about The Scarecrow and more worried about lung health, my man.

Also, I am really keen on the taikos that play just underneath the action on the screen. It’s perfect.

Batman suiting up, Christian testing out some bat-shaped throwing stars, Batman standing stoically on a rooftop with his cape flapping at his ankles, the sky a sepiatone that seems to be the color palate by which all the action will be pasted against, and even Cillian Murphy’s skeevy bad guy musings are a delight when he says “the Bat Man” gets me all sorts of geeky.

The ending clips are way too good to even try and transcribe in a meaningful way but seeing the Scarecrow and Ra’s Al Ghul in full-on head-on shots with the hell that will be visited upon the people and goons of the Loop in Chicago, er, again, Gotham, is too much to be contained in this small trailer; fanboys couldn’t have asked for a better one.

May 6, 2005

Trailer Park: Hi, my name is Werner Brandes. My voice is my passport. Verify me.

Filed under: Trailer Park — admin @ 7:23 pm

E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES By Christopher Stipp

May 6, 2005

Hi, my name is Werner Brandes. My voice is my passport. Verify me.

Watching STEPHEN TOBOLOWSKY’S BIRTHDAY PARTY I am reminded of what’s possible when people are allowed to just tell their story, unencumbered by starts, stops or the natural hesitancies of holding back.

As the camera opens on Stephen in the opening of this movie, standing on a beach near his home in California, he relates a tale of when he thought he was in front of death’s door. He tells of how he thought he was going to be eaten by a shark as he swam in deep oceanic waters. He thought the shark was probably ready to treat him like that night’s Catch of the Day, and he’s so deadly serious you have no other recourse but to listen to the man speak about this one moment in his life. It’s like listening to a master storyteller who punctuates the narrative with bits of humor and asides to make the overall picture that much more vividly painted.

It’s his birthday when he’s talking to us, the viewer, and the movie all takes place in one day as he invites people over to his home, a modest “crib” by most elitist standards but that, again, is Stephen’s charm. The man has been in dozens and dozens of films and he keeps going by taking the kinds of roles that yield personal stories that many only get to hear in a commentary track, if it all, or in a James Lipton, Inside the Actor’s Studio, conversation that usually involves the actor ingratiating him or herself as they recall how wonderful it was to work with that one actor that one time who taught them the real beauty of life. You don’t get any of that kind of pandering here because the stories that Stephen tells, as he talks directly to the camera as he prepares a dinner for his 20 or so friends, tell the tale of a man who has been around acting a long time and has seen a thing or two worth retelling.

This isn’t to say, though, that it’s all wonderful to watch. I would say that 98% of it is, but there are moments when you wonder if it’s the actor or the man behind the layers of experience that’s telling the story. It does seem, at times, that a few yarns have been carefully practiced, rehearsed, memorized, to the point that it doesn’t seem spontaneous as it does just a convention of a being a well-seasoned storyteller. However, that shouldn’t take away from the absolute joy of this picture. It’s heavy on the moments that stay with you.

I can’t tell you how illuminating it was to see Ned Ryerson, the one and only Werner Brandes (the one true star of SNEAKERS, a movie that I believe only I have a true delight in watching whenever it’s on), talk about the time he was held up at gunpoint inside a deserted supermarket. Or rather, and one of the most poignant moments of this movie, when he recalls working on the set of MISSISSIPPI BURNING when he played the local hatemonger as masses of true blue Klansmen, who participated in the movie as extras, surged with white pride as he spewed his racist monologue as they all stood wearing their real KKK outfits. As he tells the story you can see how this one moment reveals something about not only Stephen, but of this time and place. Further, he tells how a young black boy from craft services endured the air of intimidation with nary a second thought given to what the men around him must have had on their minds as he simply got Stephen some tea in an environment that many wouldn’t have been able to endure with any great amount of grace. The story is so much more richly told through the mannerisms and cadence of Stephen that it almost feels like a failure on my part for not being as effective as he was in telling it.

As you watch Stephen’s guests, which include Mena Suvari among the notables, fill into his living room you notice that Stephen is literally the main focus. Everyone’s chair and sofa all point inward so that it looks like he’s on stage, giving a performance. And that’s what it feels like to me at times. It’s not so much a bad thing as it is a function of wanting to make a movie about Stephen’s life in a way but yet retaining the feeling that these are, after all, are stories that define who he is as a person, forgetting ever so briefly that he’s very well-trained and experienced actor.

Wildly fresh and innovative in terms of its ability to make you sit there and listen, this movie doesn’t so much demand as it does, invite, you to stay a while and listen to a bit of what he has seen and been though. There is a point in the film when Stephen gets off-topic about movie making to talk about his personal life, telling a tale about being a father and wanting to tell people, but he catches the thread later on, near the end of the movie, to tie everything together in a poignant present to those who have paid attention. Was it intended to be this way? Of course, but it never feels false and that’s what’s important.

Everyone has a story, they say, but not too many people can boast of a résumé that’s as cinematically varied or as interesting to watch as STEPHEN TOBOLOWSKY’S BIRTHDAY PARTY. It’s a film that has bits of Spaulding Grey, dashes of insightfulness where many an actor could glean a thing or two with regard to seeing what’s important, and has the kind of intimacy that exudes from his frank and genial style which is communicated wonderfully in this small invitation to dine on what’s offered up.

And now, on a way unrelated note, I will be sending notes to all you contest wieners this week to let you know what free schwag you’ve won from the prize closet with regard to my super teh cool promotion of LAYER CAKE. P.S. ““ I’ve heard so many good things about this film.

And on a really unrelated note, Sunday is Mother’s Day and I’d like to give it up in full wOOT effect to my mum, Maryanne Stipp. She’s been a tireless mother and I cannot tell you how far on the thumbs-up meter she is because of her unwitting decision to take me to see ALIENS years ago; she hadn’t a clue about it and I am glad she didn’t because that one misstep showed me the power of really good action done right and how sweet looking an android is when it gets all tore up by an alien looking for blood. Also, she deserves props in recent years for enduring the important films I’ve pushed on her like a bad drug dealer: REQUIEM FOR A DREAM, MEMENTO, CROUCHING TIGER, HIDDEN DRAGON, ETERNAL SUNSHINE OF THE SPOTLESS MIND and many other gems that would’ve simply been forgotten.

Also, to my wife, Sherry Stipp, who is deserving of most any accolade I’m given as it’s her understanding that helps me to get this article done week after week with the amount of time I spend on it. I care about being heard every week and she’s responsible for always motivating me to get this thing done so she can spend more time with me and our daughter. She has yet to indulge all my suggestions for films she needs to see, like, yesterday, LOST IN TRANSLATION, HERO, ETERNAL SUNSHINE OF THE SPOTLESS MIND, REQUIEM FOR A DREAM, IN THE MOOD FOR LOVE, Wes Andersons’ oeuvre, but I am a patient man and I am thankful everyday that she is too.

Big love goes out to all moms”¦


LAST DAYS (2005) Director: Gus Van Sant
Cast: Michael Pitt, Lukas Haas, Asia Argento, Scott Green, Nicole Vicius, Ricky Jay, Ryan Orion, Harmony Korine, Kim Gordon, Andy Friberg
Release: July 22, 2005
Synopsis: LAST DAYS is filmmaker Gus Van Sant’s meditation on the inner turmoil that engulfs a brilliant, but troubled, musician in the final hours of his life. Michael Pitt (THE DREAMERS, HEDWIG AND THE ANGRY INCH) stars as Blake, an introspective artist who is buckling under the weight of fame, professional obligations, and a mounting feeling of isolation. LAST DAYS follows Blake through a handful of hours he spends in and near his wooded home, a fugitive from his own life. It is a period of random moments and fractured consciousness, fused by spontaneous bursts of rock & roll. Expanding on the elliptical style forged in his two previous films, GERRY and the Palme d’Or-winning ELEPHANT, Van Sant layers images and sounds to articulate an emotional landscape, creating a dynamic work about a soul in transition.
View Trailer:
* Medium (Flash, click on the link that says FILM ANNOUNCE)
Prognosis: Negative. Questions, questions, questions.

What really happened to Kurt Cobain? Was it suicide, a hit, an attempt by Courtney Love to bring her hysterical oafishness and lumbering idiocy to the center stage where she thought it belonged? I don’t know the answers to the first two but I am 100% sure of the latter.

I admit I am infinitely curious to know what happens to people in the last days of their lives when it comes to suicide. Are there warning signs that people just don’t see or is it something so intrinsically quiet and muted that no one would ever be able to see it manifested in any physical way? Now, seeing how this film is all fiction, the man in the movie named Blake but who seems to be Kurt’s doppelganger, it’s striking to me that Gus would go to the trouble of making someone look exactly like Kurt”¦if this isn’t a movie about Kurt. If he wanted to really make the conceit a little more thrilling he would’ve had our “protagonist” take his double-barrel pump action shotgun in slo-mo, mowing Courtney down in a spray of millimeter sized metal spheres, the heavy orbs stenciled with the words “Hack bitch” all over them, but his vision not mine, right?

The trailer, though, is quiet. There is a certain delicate balance between something going on and nothing really happening that’s apparent to the viewer as this thing unfolds.

A phone rings off camera. It rings a few times and goes quiet. The man playing fake Kurt lights a cigarette in one of the dankest and most forsaken kitchens.

The next scene shows someone fumbling with a shotgun. The scene after that shows a ragtime festooned Cobain/Blake, draped in a long overcoat, sloppily trying to run around a banister with said shotgun in one of his hands. What is this, an episode of Kurt Get Your Gun?

Some guy comes to Blake’s door, we don’t even know what our strange man looks like, but we hear him talking about business and what Blake’s business is and would like to get a better idea of it as our strange man is from the Yellow Pages sales office. The placement of this guy seems odd and the silence from Blake is disquieting. And hey, I don’t understand it either and Cobain/Blake hasn’t even said word one at this point, but it’s interesting at the very least. It’s hushed in a way that intones some sense there’s something distressingly wrong with the man we’re looking at. But, reading this far, I think the response to this is “Duh.”

The next scene seems has a woman, Courtney?, opening a door and finding a slumping Cobain. We quickly move from this to a scene where Blake is statically listening to someone on the phone asking him what’s happening over at his house. He doesn’t say a word. He just lets the person ramble on as we wonder why he seems to be so verbally constricted.

We get some rather stark images of a wandering Blake, once of him naked in a river and another one of him walking aimlessly in a forest (Symbolism alert!) as a woman who doesn’t quite look like Courtney says to Blake that he could leave and get away from his situation.

Now, I don’t read French, but if my ability to decipher means anything to anyone I believe this trailer ends with a statement that the movie is a work of fiction and not really true. What’s more and, I believe, more insulting, is the fact that the very last few moments of this trailer is spent pimping the soundtrack to the film which you can buy on the 9th of May in French music stores everywhere. Shamless.


BROKEN (2005) Director: Alex Ferrari
Cast: Daniel Samantha Jane Polay, Paul Gordon, Amber Crawford, Derek Evans, Tony Gomez, Ruben Gomez, Eric Townsend
Release: Coming Soon
Synopsis: A gun blast, a flash of light, and a young woman awakens to the comfort of her own bed. Bonnie Clayton has it all, a great relationship, a challenging career, and the burden of a dream that grows more vivid and disturbing with each passing night. But when Bonnie is abducted by a sadistic stranger and his colorful entourage, she discovers that the key to her survival lies within the familiar realms of her recurring dream.p> View Trailer:
* Medium (Windows Media, QuickTime)
Prognosis: Positive. I like the DIY attitude some people have. There are those who will do whatever it takes to get something done and there are those that do whatever it takes and then step it up a notch or two. This trailer shows you the eagerness of a filmmaker who really wants to create something special with effects in a way that eschews modernist ideas that a first movie should mean something, on a deep level, but instead takes the tack that a good shoot-em-up is a road less traveled by first time directors.

We start off with a woman, gagged, being pushed in a wheelchair. The location seems unimportant but it definitely is industrial. The music is perfect. It’s a mix between someone beating on a thin oil drum and a stopwatch. It creates mood, which is good, and also sets up tone, two vital parts to a story like this.

Quickly, we see an odd object being pulled off screen, a bloody implement is dripping with its latest kill, and we see our gagged woman having the tape on her mouth forcibly removed. I’m sure it would’ve been more painful looking if it was due to a Brazilian wax.

A man, impeccably dressed in a crisp white shirt, vest and tie, asks our frizzled haired woman if he looks familiar. The music changes.

The song then becomes the song from THE MATRIX RELOADED, “Teahouse” by Juno Reactor and Gocoo. It’s a great Taiko drum composition and one that easily raises the excitement level for anything it plays underneath. The primal and visceral mode this trailer shifts gears into just launches it to the next step of keeping an audience’s attention.

Here, in this trailer, it works beautifully to play against the images of wanton and merciless violence being perpetuated in every which direction. There are guns, knives, big dudes with bigger arms, scopes, night vision and every other clichéd, albeit necessary, element to a short film where you want to create the illusion that it is possible to have mass amounts of people converging on one location to either save, kill or abscond with a woman at the center of it all.

The trailer even ends with the woman crying out that she wants her life back as the camera violently shakes side to side, which looks like the effect employed in FIGHT CLUB when, at the end, Ed and Brad’s characters quake in the same physical space. It’s very crafty and I can appreciate the time it must have taken to get this one just right with regard to timing and scene placements.

This has to be one of the better made action trailers I’ve seen in some weeks.


A HOLE IN ONE (2004) Director: Richard Ledes
Cast: Michelle Williams, Tim Guinee, Meat Loaf, Merritt Wever, Louis Zorich, Bill Raymond
Release: May 6, 2005 (Limited)
Synopsis: Set in small-town America circa 1953, A HOLE IN ONE is a screwball-noir starring Michelle Williams as Anna, a young woman whose desire for mental health leads her to covet its latest fashion–transorbital lobotomy.
Her reasons are many. Raised in an archetypal cold-war family, Anna is haunted by her family’s treatment of her brother as invisible when he returns “shell-shocked” from World War II and then by his sudden, unexpected death. Anna is scooped-up by Billy (Meat Loaf Aday), a small time gangster, when she is just barely old enough to be considered a woman. View Trailer:
* Medium (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Positive. I’ve never watched a single episode of Dawson’s Creek and the first time I did see Michelle Williams in a big budget production of a movie was her “performance” in HALLOWEEN: H20. It was my first exposure to Josh Hartnett as well and it soured me completely on the two of them and rightfully so. I didn’t come off my high horse until I saw DICK and BLACK HAWK DOWN, respectively.

This trailer, though, warms me up further to Williams’ acting abilities and, to add a little more to it, the editing of the trailer itself is simply alluring.

Usually, right before I see a trailer I get an idea of what I’m seeing. Other times, though, I just like to see if I am able to “get” what they’re selling by having no hints about the plot or who’s even in the film.

Michelle pops with flavor as she narrates the opening shot of this advertisement; she is standing on a beach, alone, with a head scarf wrapped around her head.

“My memories of the time leading up to my decision to get a lobotomy are fragmented”¦”

It’s a period piece and, just like a page ripped from ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOO’S NEST, deals with the subject of using medieval and savage science to treat and diagnose a problem that’s not easily solved with a pair of alligator clips and a DieHard car battery from Sears; the only place where it was done to good effect, making for some great comedy, was in STRANGE BREW and I believe the premise of shock treatments is comedic, albeit black, in nature here as well.

Since everything happens around 1948 it’s funny to note that you’re not quite sure if it’s all supposed to be amusing or wickedly on the mark with how medical science was back then. In fact, the trailer has some doctor giving a speech to a gaggle of simpletons who are being new schooled on modern lobotomy techniques. Michelle nearly swoons at the idea of having her head scrambled as she says she’s already absent-minded. This can only help, right? All the while she’s stating on how she wants to have this done to her we suddenly get introduced to her boyfriend, Meat Loaf. Disregarding the really churlish comments one can make about her and him being an “item,” the years between them are nothing compared to the obvious absurdity of their pairing. It’s bizarre, in a John Waters kind of way, to hear Loaf validate Williams’ wish to get a lobotomy in a romantic statement of support.

The plot doesn’t get any easier to decipher than that.

She ends up getting one, something goes screwy where she ends up more withdrawn than before (imagine that), she hooks up with a young doctor who wants to give her another lobotomy along with a good rogering, and her life seems to schism on these different experiences.

“To pursue forgetfulness is to pursue happiness”¦”

The film is listed as a comedy and I can’t see how you could construct such a film in any other way. You could go for the dramatic angle but something like this, where a woman is steadfast in her desire to lobotomize her problems and only ends up creating more, but seeing Loaf again in a role where he plays the unintended heavy like he did in FIGHT CLUB just makes this black comedy that much more appealing.


SAINT RALPH (2005) Director: Michael McGowan
Cast: Adam Butcher, Campbell Scott, Shauna MacDonald, Gordon Pinsent, Michael Kanev, Tamara Hope, Jennifer Tilly
Release: May 13, 2005
Synopsis: Set in Hamilton in 1954, Saint Ralph is the unlikely story of Ralph Walker, a ninth grader who outran everyone’s expectations except his own in his bold quest to win the Boston Marathon. Ralph is a fatherless 14-year-old with a seriously ill mother, who knows he’s a time bomb waiting to explode into greatness, except that he has no idea where that greatness will manifest itself. An unfortunate incident of self-abuse in the community pool inadvertently sets him on this road when, as penance, Ralph is conscripted to the cross-country team. Desperate to believe a miracle will bring his mother out of a coma, Ralph becomes a convert to the church of running, and determines to win the Boston Marathon.
View Trailer:
* Medium (Windows Media)
Prognosis: Positive. If there was a small cheering section for Campbell Scott somewhere in this world I would like to think I would be one of its most vociferous members.

Ever since SINGLES I’ve been a quiet fan of the guys work. He’s nearly, completely, off the mainstream Hollywood radar but yet his stints in ROGER DODGER and THE SPANISH PRISONER are simply the kinds of performances that make you believe he’s just that good.

The trailer here starts out amusingly enough. You’ve got your standard boy who can’t do anything else but think of impure thoughts about women. The fact that after he stares at a woman bending over, revealing ample cleavage that would easily make the baby Jesus cry, and runs straight into a tree just shows us the kind of kid who we’re dealing with here. Add in a little Catholic school where he’s having problems fitting in with the program, disregarding the hideous cards in-between the scenes that are simply useless and distracting, and punctuating everything with a little showboating to the girls he’s trying to impress, you have all the markings for a fairly standard coming-of-age story.

However, things take a sharp turn to the left when our protagonists’ mother falls into a coma for reasons we’re not quite sure of. What is clear, though, is that event awakens something in this pre-pube, pre-pubescent lad and gets him thinking more about the big picture than of big mammaries.

Campbell Scott plays the inspirational educator who mentions that faith requires you to truly believe in something that doesn’t make any logical sense. Campbell is the motivator here and, unlike his Hollywood contemporaries who, in a coaching role, teach their wards the value of winning by working hard and striving for blah blah blah, I actually believe Campbell’s interest in this boy’s trajectory is genuine.

Then, something else happens. Our young lad feels the need to run. More specifically, he feels the need to run the Boston Marathon. When Scott mentions that the young boy actually winning the marathon would constitute a miracle the “ding” of the Please Ring For Service bell clues us in on how this meshes with the kid’s notion of his mother needing a miracle to come out of her coma and, ta-da, you have our goal that needs a resolution.

I’m usually good with my Crap Detector when I think I’m being artificially manipulated into feeling all goosey for something so obviously done out of pseudo sympathy and dripping with treacle but I’ll be dammed if I didn’t start to get all gooey as this kid trains his heart out. Campbell Scott has his own issues to deal with as he helps the young boy on his quest to win the marathon, as there is some bombastic yelling from the head priest/deity/headmaster/potential pedophile/whatever when Campbell is admonished about helping the kid along any further, but you really do think there’s something to this story right before the gun goes off at the start of the race.

You just have to know that the kid’s not going to win the race but here is an example of a movie where the obvious outcome, the protagonist winning it all in the end, is supplanted with the possibility of an ending actually fitting in with some sort of reality and, for a film of this size, I sure do hope it’s more about the journey than the goal.


HOWL’S MOVING CASTLE (2005) Director: Hayao Miyazaki
Cast: (Voices) Emily Mortimer, Jean Simmons, Christian Bale, Billy Crystal, Lauren Bacall, Blythe Danner, Josh Hutcherson
Release: June 10, 2005
Synopsis: A distinguished cast of actors, under the direction of Pixar’s Pete Docter (“Monsters, Inc.”), lend their vocal talents to this English-language version of the film. Sophie (voiced by Emily Mortimer), an average teenage girl working in a hat shop, finds her life thrown into turmoil when she is literally swept off her feet by a handsome-but-mysterious wizard named Howl (voiced by Christian Bale), and is subsequently turned into a 90-year old woman (voiced by screen legend and two-time Oscar® nominee Jean Simmons) by the vain and conniving Wicked Witch of the Waste (voiced by screen legend and Oscar® nominee Lauren Bacall).
Embarking on an incredible odyssey to lift the curse, she finds refuge in Howl’s magical moving castle where she becomes acquainted with Markl, Howl’s apprentice, and a hot-headed fire demon named Calcifer (voiced by Billy Crystal). Sophie’s love and support comes to have a major impact on Howl, who flies in the face of orders from the palace to become a pawn of war and instead risks his life to help bring peace to the kingdom. Extraordinary characters, inventive imagery, and stunning artistry make this latest masterpiece from the visionary Miyazaki an unforgettable filmgoing experience. View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Positive. HOWLS MOVING CASTLE had me frothing popcorn kernels from the sides of my mouth.

As you watch the opening scene from this trailer you can start to see why CGI hasn’t yet dominated everything that’s colorful and exciting with regard to animation.

I was all wOOt’s and claps when Miyazaki won the Academy Award for SPIRITED AWAY and this trailer, as it unfolds, possesses that certain charm that animated movies, great ones, exude.

The music is jaunty as tanks and war machines roll through a small European town with a beautiful but sad looking woman watching this all unfold. She’s quiet but the colors and animation are doing all the communicating. The scenes, background, and weather pop off the screen; it’s nearly kinesthetic. It’s a world I can see existing.

The real and normal, though, in true Miyazaki fashion, bends and shifts into the unnatural.

Our beautiful young woman hooks up with a Danish looking Dutch Boy representative, wearing a very fey short coat and open Fabio-style shirt where a small amulet hangs from his neck. The guy/eunuch turns out to be doling out witchcraft instead of high glossy house paint.

What this relationship has to do with her being cursed as she’s subsequently turned into an old woman, and her fleeing the safe confines of her town, I haven’t a clue. I do know, though, that the vagabonds she eventually gets hooked up with, looking like extras from the much failed RETURN TO OZ flick from the 80’s, are all sorts of crazy. I mean that in a good way, though.

Wizards, spells, magic, faerie dust, most unnatural creatures, and various other mythical elements pop off the screen with a pizzazz and subdued glee that kids everywhere would no doubt put down their PSP’s for. Obviously, almost being 30 myself, I can’t help but feel wonderment at the imagination that is whirling the real with all too surreal together in a blending of mythos and traditional storytelling.

As for the voice talent, well, Billy Crystal? I’m not so sure about that guy. If you can keep him from being a parody of himself I think I’ll be able to ride the wave for the hour and a half this thing runs and wait for the DVD version where I’ll be able and turn the subtitles on. Christian Bale, however, is perfect. In the trailer you can feel his power as a narrator. His talking in AMERICAN PSYCHO, best exemplified in the scene where he’s ruminating on his business cards with his other cronies, is hands-down the best example of why I could listen to that guy rattle off the contents of the letter M in an Encyclopedia Britannica and why he’s great here.

The trailer ends on a whimper of sorts and the lame presentation of the movie’s website doesn’t really help things to end well but the fact this is Miyazaki’s newest addition to the canon of good animation the chances of this stinking are less than that of guaranteeing that Disney’s next home-grown animation entry will pale in comparison to this and is worth the risk of seeing this sight unseen.

Powered by WordPress