FRED Entertainment

October 28, 2005

Trailer Park: THIS SPACE FOR RENT

Filed under: Trailer Park — admin @ 7:50 pm

By Christopher Stipp

October 28, 2005

THIS SPACE FOR RENT

So, it’s been a week and not much has been happening.

I did fall prey to a wicked flu that rendered my insides to the same consistency of Quaker Oats Apple Cinnamon oatmeal.

While I don’t have much to talk about being letting you all loose on yet another exploration into the machinations of Hollywood’s ad machine I do have one subject on my mind: crap kid’s films.

I had the grave misfortune to have caught, nay forced, exhibition of ANGELS IN THE OUTFIELD. Besides being a flick that even Frank Capra would accuse of being disgustingly sentimental and impossibly probable beyond even the best scribes’ abilities the movie is just a throwaway.

Yes, I understand the apologist who says that kids movies shouldn’t be held to the same standards as adult films but I disagree. Smart writing, intelligent construction should transcend any age barrier. Need I say anything about THE IRON GIANT, TOY STORY, SHREK or even THE INCREDIBLES? Ostensibly, these are all animated films but that makes the live action movies like ANGELS that much more inexcusable. Sure, Tony Danza stars as a slumping pitcher which is as believable as him as a housekeeper but you also had Matthew McConaughey and Oscar winner Adrian Brody giving embarassing support performances.

I think I only bring this up because I have been seeing, and analyzing, what kind of films have been coming out for kids in the past decade and seeing the quality really improve. Obviously, you’re always going to get a few rotten throwaways in any given year but thanks to DVD I can start programming my brood early on to the kinds of pictures which I think are not only entertaining but offer a quantifiably better viewing experience. Now, I may be wrong but ever since I started playing THE INCREDIBLES to my two year old she asks to watch that one again and again while ANGELS was a mere afterthought only moments after it ended and before I sat down on Sunday morning, enjoying myself thoroughly as I took in KUFFS.

Now, one last order of business. The Big Weiners who scored a copy of UNLEASHED on DVD. Much thanks go out to Universal Home Video who supplied the copies for this contest. I honestly didn’t expect to get more than 5 or 10 responses to the contest but I ended up getting DOZENS of emails clammoring to get a free DVD. I know it’s facetious for some people to thank everyone who entered but I honestly appreciate every entry as it let me know a) a lot of you can read b) are reading my column and c) love free crap. So, big ups to every one of you. As for those who are going home with the big cash and prizes, give it up to:

R. Stevens
J. Willey
D. Goldberg
J. Colvin
and
Dan. If you’re named Dan and you entered the contest check your email. If you didn’t get a note from me then it was the OTHER Dan who won.


CURIOUS GEORGE (2006) Director: Matthew O’Callaghan
Cast: Will Ferrell, Drew Barrymore, David Cross, Eugene Levy, Joan Plowright, Dick Van Dyke, Ed O’Ross
Release: February 10, 2006
Synopsis: The story follows George, the inquisitive little primate transplanted from the jungle to the big city by The Man in the Yellow Hat, where his spunky and fun-loving nature endear him to new friends he meets along the way and lands him in a series of adventures.
View Trailer:
* Medium (QuickTime)
Prognosis: Positive. Confession time: My daughter, on an average day, has at least one Curious George book read to her. Now, if it was my choice, and I know it’s not, I would read these books to her on my own terms not hers. That’s why I am not reticent about admitting that I read these things to her in the dimmest of dim light next to her bed and, if I am unusually unlucky, stumble through the prose like I was taught my ABC’s the week before.

This trailer, therefore, delights me.

Now, I am not critiquing this one on its ability to sell me. In the dozens of trailers that I have deconstructed like I was the Caterpillar of the filmic universe I think I am always trying to see what it is that they’re trying to sell me. Here, though, the trailer is a vehicle not to so much sell as it is a prepping tool to the adults who will be forced to take their kids to it. Me? I’m happily going but many adults play the “Who’s-Gonna-Take-Johnny-To-This-One” like it’s a Rock/Paper/Scissors exercise. I say fear not, for the explosions of contrasting colors and vibrant hues of The Man In The Yellow Hat, voiced by Will Ferrell, not only attracts your eyes like a bug zapper to those blue fluorescent bulbs of death but Will really sells the character in the opening sequence.

The palate chosen to draw this feature against really does the books some justice insofar that the backgrounds are really a part of the George universe. That universe may not exist in reality, and as other animation studios have proven with their ability to render life-life environments, but it’s nice to have something close to traditional animation come into the market.

In terms of the scenes chosen to showcase the storyline of this picture it would be useless to describe them. Really, George gets loose in the city, George gets loose in the park, George gets loose in the zoo, George drinks a coffee drink and belches. The latter is important to explain, I think. More and more the public expulsion of gas, be that oral or anal, is put into kids trailers and I don’t think I have a problem with that. It is funny, it will always be funny, and I think that if anyone does have a problem with it I would wonder what that household must be like to live under the notion that bodily functions are reprehensible. I like it and it’s cheeky, all in good fun.

What’s more about this trailer is that even though this movie is dropping in February, a notorious dumping ground for flicks that didn’t quite make the grade for either the holiday season or for other advantageous times in the release calendar throughout the year, this movie doesn’t have to make a big splash. As Jon Favreau pointed out during his press for ZATHURA, kids movies are safe bets for studios because they aren’t really budget hogs and, if you make something fairly good, the odds are in your favor to make your money back. I think that having Will Ferrell is a plus, that Ron Howard is a producer on this thing is another and with a nice, laidback soundtrack by Jack Johnson makes this a movie many parents like me, in their 30’s won’t be so against seeing.

Nothing says love like taking in a movie, being able to sit in the dark, and having your kid shut their yap for 90 minutes in the middle of the day. As Men-On-Film would say, that would be “Fab-You-Lus.”


THE RINGER (2005) Director: Barry W. Blaustein
Cast: Johnny Knoxville, Katherine Heigl, Brian Cox
Release: December 23, 2005
Synopsis: When Steve Barker (Knoxville) finds himself running dead last in the corporate rat race, he sinks to an all time low…he attempts to rig the Special Olympics by pretending to be intellectually challenged. But, Barker is completely out-classed by his fellow Olympians, who are not only better athletes; they’re just plain better people. And they’re on to him. But rather than rat-out the rat, they join forces with him to once and for all beat Jimmy, the cocky reigning champion of the annual games. With a work-out regime uniquely their own, they train Barker to go for the gold and, in the process, show him what’s at the heart of a true winner.
View Trailer:
* Medium (QuickTime)
Prognosis: Retched. Goddamn, I have no love for this trailer.

The mere premise of this flick had me gnawing at my knuckles to see whether this could be the one movie of the year where I could go and feel absolutely guilty for watching (I saw JACKASS: THE MOVIE a few times just for the staged insanity of it all) and I even reviewed the teaser trailer WAAAY back a long time ago.

It seems I waited all that time for a half-baked film that overreaches with its idea of what could be funny and stoops to some of the most inane clichés to try and be something more than what it is: a shit looking flick.

We start out pretty bland as well with the voiceover that leads us into the actual film proper. I understand with the real Winter Olympics coming up in a few months that this should be pretty awe inspiring, the grandiose horns and the black and white footage of real athletes striding into an Olympic stadium, but I know what’s coming. The voiceover is an almost ancillary device to the real one where we go to Johnny being an idiot but this smoke and mirrors technique of starting out with something dignified before launching into the absurd, pulling the rug from unsuspecting people like it’s a funny frat joke, is just a lazy way to intro a movie. But, I will admit this: seeing the rube who can’t make it over the high jump, and falls straight down to the ground on his ass because, ostensibly, he’s “handi-capable” is funny, as is Brian Cox’s quick sound bite that he’s going to fix the Special Olympics.

That much is great but it slowly fizzles and it’s all because the premise can’t hold up with what we’re given to chew on, visually. Knoxville’s ruse, when he first opens his mouth and declares what he is, his ailment, is nigh embarrassing to watch. It’s fucking painful, actually.

What’s more is that we’re given lots of Knoxville’s mugging. We see that his initial blurting about how retarded his is just extends into other, more lame attempts to affect the mannerisms of those who are genuinely developmentally disabled. This isn’t to say, though, that I am against this kind of humor. I will readily admit that Damon Wayans’ Handyman was, perhaps, some of the best comedy to deal with this kind of subject matter. It was smart and funny. This is just pathetic.

Also, the extended clip of Brian and Johnny debating the parameters of who gets to park in the handicapped areas and who doesn’t is just, well, lame. It doesn’t so much make me feel one way or the other, giggles or jeers, but it just seems inserted for no reason at all. Its resolution just begs the question, “Why?” I have no idea.

I think that the only thing really insulting is the actual insertion of real people who do have genuine ailments. To use them to pimp your own poorly constructed flick almost seems like a grab at something genuine but all it does to me is instill a shame in even watching this trailer. There is a lot of Johnny falling on his ass, for no good reason, and I can’t figure out why any of this is happening. Is Johnny really mentally unstable? Is he really retarded in the pejorative sense? Again, I have no answers, I only have observations.

And what, ultimately, really incenses me is the way Johnny “comes around” at the end of this trailer by stating that some of the people he’s come to know could compete in the real Olympics and it feels like he’s unduly trying to curry favor with an audience who should see right through this feeble attempt to exonerate the whole idea that his initial actions excuse the rest of what he’s done.

I thought I wanted to see this film, I thought this would be done the way a film like this should be made, but I was wrong. Really wrong.


KIDS IN AMERICA (2005) Director: Josh Stolberg
Cast: Crystal Celeste Grant, Alex Anfanger, Julie Bowen, Malik Yoba, Andrew Shaifer, Nicole Richie
Release: October 21, 2005
Synopsis: A diverse group of high school students band together to peacefully stick it to their overbearing principal.
View Trailer:
* Medium (QuickTime)
Prognosis: Negative. One of the first things you have to do when watching lots of trailers on the Internets is keep an open mind. Because you can see who’s in a movie you may dismiss the flick out of hat. Seeing Nicole Richie is in this flick didn’t make me want to see this thing any more than wanting a screaming case of crabs.

I did, though, want to see what genre this cookie-cutter teen flick falls into. I’ll admit that I was surprised by the opening. There is some actual potential in a trailer that quietly opens up with a teacher, looking like art guru Bob Ross’ odd woodland cousin, sitting in front of a class, trying to make some kind connection between the movies GREASE, GREASE II and MARY POPPINS. I think I wanted something funny to come roaring at me but instead I get the word “Comedy” from that man’s lips and I’m whisked from that classroom and into the world of teensploitation.

I don’t think that’s a bad thing, per se, there’s the bitchy cheerleaders who, if you’re a fan of Lizzie Mcguire like me, are prevalent at all levels of school based programming, the hard core gym teacher (I did like the way the NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET series dealt with the overbearing gym coach in that really creepy way) and the tough as spit principal who’s not going to take any lip.

I fear that the happy-joy feelings I started to cultivate are getting destroyed by what seems to be the heinous direct-to-video offerings of the once great National Lampoon imprint; I mean, my God, have you seen the product literally clogging the shelves at your local video store? I don’t think, even if I was 13 again, would I rent those films, even if there was the possibility of some soft-core frontal action.

Alas, it is every worst-case scenario come to life as this trailer rolls on. Not even the inclusion of Rosanna Arquette, Elizabeth Perkins and Julie Bowen (who were all obviously late on their H3 payments and needed some quick flash money) can save this trailer. I don’t expect much out of my high school themed productions but when there isn’t any scene I can bring up here to even give props to there are major issues abounding everywhere.

You have the entire cadre of clichés, personalities, plot and there is even the hint of knowing how exactly this movie will end. Life is tough in high school, evil principal and uncaring teachers enforce rules with little regard to reality, a handful of kids stand up against establishment, kids liberate the hearts and minds of everyone.

Now, the only question left to answer is how long will it take before this movie is whisked away from major distribution and put alongside the latest offerings from the Blue Collar Comedy Tour.

For shame. Where’s Christian Slater when you need him?


GUY X (2005) Director: Saul Metzstein
Cast: Jason Biggs, Natascha McElhone, Jeremy Northam Michael Ironside, Sean Tucker
Release: October 28th, 2005
Synopsis: A black comedy set in 1979, about a soldier mistakenly posted to an Arctic military base.
View Trailer:
* Medium (QuickTime)
Prognosis: Positive. I think I was at the end of my rope in trying to find something, anything, I’d like to see in a theater.

Trailer after trailer I was stopping a few seconds in, others were better as I waited an entire minute before shutting them off. However, when I stumbled on this one I couldn’t help myself but be amazed at the lunacy factor that this flick gives off like radioactive particles tickling an isotope identifier.

I’ve never been a huge Jason Biggs fan, and I do understand the concept of appreciating one’s work without having a shrine dedicated to their ability to fake being someone on the screen, but I like him. His presence has grown on me and I think it was only after I watched JERSEY GIRL last weekend, realizing it honestly is an unsung gem of a flick, that I let this trailer play itself out.

I’m glad I did because this is an odd bird of a trailer if there ever was one which deals with Jason’s accidental placement on a remote base as a soldier in Greenland. What I think I appreciate a great deal in this trailer is that it’s quick to set things up. That’s a good thing because without a real “name” in the film that someone can admire a few seconds you run the risk of someone tuning out. This trailer doesn’t afford you that possibility. Straight up, this is 1979 and it’s far from anywhere. Thanks, really, I appreciate that information. It’s just a little info but I appreciate the honesty.

Seeing Jason slush his way through the mess hall on his first day there, sitting across from Natascha McElhone, a delightful actress who really deserved a little more time in THE TRUMAN SHOW, and finding out that, no, it’s not Hawaii he’s at but at a place a little more chilly.

Now, because he’s in the wrong place, and is denied the opportunity to leave the base because of his “skillz,” he’s all out of sorts. This no doubt being an issue to Jason, and his less than positive attitude at being there, the soldiers themselves seem to be suffering a bit from what Inuit call Pibloktog or Windigo among the Cree, seeing chicks run around in Army olive colored bikinis, it’s nice to see the aggression of some who insist Jason get off his ass. Seeing some dude scream really loud that, “You got guard duty, you piece of shit,” while not really something readily translatable for television audiences it does, however, make the Internets a nice place to see this kind of material.

Also, the inclusion of Jeremy “THE NET” Northam and, holy crap, Michael Ironside as a man with virtually no name, and that sexy throaty speak which I bet the chicks dig, add a certain something to this film about a man who just wants to get away from this one base in the middle of nowhere. Jason really fits well into this movie and it honestly shows. No longer does he seem awkward but he commands the space he takes up in this trailer.

This has the sheen of CATCH-22, a movie which doesn’t seem like requisite watching for many folks, but like BUFFALO SOLDIERS I am almost willing to portend that this movie won’t find its audience. War movies are like kids movies with the kind of built-in audience it has but most any flick which deals with some of the blacker areas of enlisted life have a harder time with people in getting them to watch. I don’t know why because watching this trailer only engenders curiosity and eagerness in me.


RUMOR HAS IT (2005) Director: Rob Reiner
Cast: Jennifer Aniston, Kevin Costner, Shirley MacLaine, Mark Ruffalo, Mena Suvari
Release: December 25, 2005
Synopsis: Jennifer Aniston plays a woman who learns that her family was the inspiration for the book and film “The Graduate” — and that she just might be the offspring of the well-documented event.
View Trailer:
* Medium (QuickTime)
Prognosis: Negative. Why in Lord’s name, be thy all holy, do these movies get the green light why any new Jean-Claude Van Damme movie go straight to video?

I understand the nature of these films. Hell, I am even willing to put out there that these are a necessary evil in that they help get smaller projects the kind of fiscal help they wouldn’t have received in the first place thanks to the blue hairs and AARP discount tickets these last bastions of true milquetoast studio pictures are able to generate.

Thankfully, I’m not let down by the opening which looks like it was lit by a crew of German Nazis who are well versed in the power of klieg lighting. I mean, jeez, look at the faces of Ruffalo and Aniston as the Ms. asks Ruffalo if he’d like to do a little vertical taco noshing at 30,000 feet. His pores seemingly leap off the screen as does Aniston’s droopy lids which are starting to show signs of human normalcy which I like to call aging. The premise of these two coming together is fairly hot but in the context of this scene it all feels quite un-hot and embarrassingly lame. Hey, I would hit that like Farrah Faucet after a long night of binge drinking before having the cops called on me but I just felt a quick need to leave the scene. Thankfully, we do.

Cue lame yet hauntingly jaunty orchestral string movement.

Wow, now this is interesting, the set design used for the interiors is refreshingly original and hearkens to a time I can’t quite place. Oh, yes I can, MEET THE PARENTS. That’s right, oh, and FATHER OF THE BRIDE. You say this movie is about a girl who’s about to get married? Oh, surely you jest! What passes for a lifelike environment just appears to be leftovers from scads of different flicks set in an upper-middle class, white, WASPy to be sure, suburbia; a utopia that is far removed from normalcy, reality or anything resembling an actual weather system. And speaking of Old Man Winter, you get the pleasure of seeing Shirly MacLaine in all out-of-body glory. The woman looks positively bathed in some rejuvenating baby oil, slicker than a Slip N’ Slide if I could speak candidly, and I honestly don’t think she looks anything older than 65. The woman simply looks like she is going to beat Dick Clark at this Fountain of Youth competition. Darren Aronofsky could’ve saved himself shitloads of cash to make his vision of THE FOUNTAIN by casting the two of them to battle for supremacy of some Pond’s Youth Defining lotion.

When at first you think this is going to be flick starring Ruffalo and Aniston you are quickly schooled with a swift monkey punch to the gooch as the big reveal is that Shirley MacLaine is, once more, made out to be the sex kitten that she isn’t. Not to take anything away from her but aren’t there any more mature looking ladies who could’ve done this part? Anyone? Tossing Kevin Costner into the mix, playing Simon and Garfunkel’s “Mrs. Robinson” is damn near blasphemy in my book but, you’re all right, I hear you, this movie was not genetically engineered with me in mind.

Oh, and I must share this, the coup de grace of it all? That Kevin and Jennifer have a fling? Besides the age difference which doesn’t affect me, it’s the weird goings on with Kevin’s hair that alarms me. It looks like graying peach fuzz and it just kills any hotness I could fervently muster to try and see past it all. I just can’t believe it.

There is a moment where Mark obviously learns about the affair and I think, honestly think, as he’s going to give Jennifer a nice doling out of Alabama Backhand justice but it’s all bark and no bite as I am once more reminded of Shirley’s propensity for liquor, odd as it is, in damn near every movie of hers that I’ve been harangued into seeing. She’s like a tart that won’t ever realize her limitations as an older lady; it’s no longer sexy, it’s saddening.

October 27, 2005

Scrubs Blog: Week 1

Filed under: Production Blogs,Quickcasts,Scrubs Blog,Video — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:33 pm
scrubsheader.jpg


VIDEO BLOG #1: “My Introduction” ““
Series Creator/Executive Producer Bill Lawrence sets the stage after the writing staff is menaced by wildlife.

01-scrubs-01.jpg

Download Scrubs Video Blog #1:

  • Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 10.8 MB)
  • Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 4.86 MB)

VIDEO BLOG #2: “My 5×01 Production Meeting” ““
Everyone’s back after a restful summer, diving right into the deep end for the show’s 5th season.

01-scrubs-02.jpg

Download Scrubs Video Blog #2:

  • Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 37.3 MB)
  • Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 16.1 MB)


VIDEO BLOG #3: “My Emmy Toast” ““
The cast & crew share some celebratory champagne prior to this year’s Emmy Awards.

01-scrubs-03.jpg

Download Scrubs Video Blog #3:

  • Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 22.1 MB)
  • Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 9.57 MB)

VIDEO BLOG #4: “My Emmy Featurette” ““
Newly-minted “Emmy Winning Scrubs Editor” John Michel discusses his win, while the golden lady looks on approvingly.

01-scrubs-04.jpg

Download Scrubs Video Blog #4:

  • Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 21.8 MB)
  • Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 9.64 MB)

VIDEO BLOG #5: “My Scary Story” ““
Ken Jenkins (Dr. Kelso) gets into the Halloween spirit with a macabre performance of a classic
campfire tale.

01-scrubs-05.jpg

Download Scrubs Video Blog #5:

  • Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 46.8 MB)
  • Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 20.8 MB)

##

October 21, 2005

Trailer Park: OFF-WEEK

Filed under: Trailer Park — admin @ 7:48 pm

By Christopher Stipp October 21, 2005

OFF-WEEK

Alright, peeps, how are are all of you doing out there?

Yes, it is time once again for a full five trailer review column penned by moi, whether you like it or are only checking back here from week to week hoping to see someone new writing this thing, and I have to be honest when I say that I am glad to be sending my out my musings this week.

I have to be honest when I emote that I hope some of you enjoy the interviews when I am sticking them in here. I know there are a hardcore sect of you out in Audience Land who get all sorts of riled up when I used to prempt the whole damn column just to chat it up with Darren Aronofsky or Joel Silver/Natalie Portman. I make sure to give you kids a bare minimum of trailer thoughts every week to satiate most every reader here. Why I bring this up is because I have a doozy of an interview which will be landing here in this space quite shortly. I’m not sure I want to spoil it, and I know when the actual thing drops many will feel cheated by any hype here I may interject, but to set the scene without setting it I had the chance to talk to someone who is involved with one of the better movies coming out in the next couple months, a flick that’s honestly being mentioned with the words “Oscar contender” along with it as if it’s a subtitle to the film.

Honestly, the conversation only had to last 15 to 30 minutes. I don’t know if it was my subject’s honest and genuine inclination to want to talk more about not only the big movie but other things as well about their career or if it was something else (you just never know who is playing whom in this business) but we chatted for over an hour, face-to-face in what is, and you know how loathe I am to interject superlatives into my writing unless I am honestly feeling it, the best interview I have conducted. Hands down, no contest, really.

I have to break this goddamn thing into two parts, giving you other people who won’t be interested at all in the conversations of others no matter how impressive their resume, in order to give you the full scope of where this individual is coming from. It all sounds quite unnecessarily dramatic, I know, but after I left the space where we both sat talking I am hopeful that if you gave this interview a chance you will find a whole new reason to check out this person’s oevure.

I really don’t want to say any more but since this space really is dedicated to just showcase what’s on display in my mind’s window I figured I would share this little bit in hopes it generates some interest AND that it keeps an angry mob quelled as I try and add even more content to a packed couple weeks coming up.

I still have that interview, perhaps the world’s shortest interview at that, with Maggie Grace from Lost where we rap about the flick which reached #1 status over the weekend (Did anyone see it? Was it really as bad as some people have made it out to be) and that little TV show she’s on. It may not be uber timely now that the flick has already come like a teen who has just rounded 2nd and has just been given the windmill by the 3rd base coach it may or may not be entirely relevent. At least, though, you’ll get to see more gratitutious shots of her in this space; lord only knows this column could use some more ladies. Also, and I know this is a bit redundant, you must, have to, check out WALLACE AND GROMIT: THE CURSE OF THE WERE-RABBIT. I don’t think I like it too much when people start using their kids as excuses as to why they haven’t been to the theater in decades and that’s why I crossed my fingers and took my 2 yr. 3 mo. little nugget to see her 2nd movie ever in her life. The first one was last month when I took her to see MARCH OF THE PENGUINS. Worked like a champ, it did. The pretzel and copious amounts of lemonade helped too but she stared at the screen like it was a teat ready to help her live. It was just her and I at the cineplex and I cannot reccommended the experience more than I already have.

I think one of the things I’ve chewed on lately was Kevin’s admission that CLERKS 2 is really more about an examination of how Randall and Dante have evolved since we last left them. Before, I don’t think, like many, “got” why the sequel had to be made. But, listening to Kevin explain it, it made perfect sense. 10 years ago? This column would be all about my weekly pleas to Evangelene Lily of Lost to break me off a piece of that sumthin’-sumthin’, and championing every low-brow actioneer as the next coming of Lundgren, but issues realted to evolution, how we start doing the kinds of things we never thought we would 10, 5 or 2 years ago certainly something that’s interesting to me and I hope you see that as I keep writing this thing, hoping to connect with at least one of you out there who can relate.

Enjoy the show!


SYRIANA (2005) Director: George Clooney
Cast: George Clooney, Matt Damon, Amanda Peet, Chris Cooper, William Hurt
Release: December 9, 2005
Synopsis: A political thriller that unfolds against the intrigue of the global oil industry. From the players brokering back-room deals in Washington to the men toiling in the oil fields of the Persian Gulf, the film’s multiple storylines weave together to illuminate the human consequences of the fierce pursuit of wealth and power. Each plays their small part in the vast and complex system that powers the industry, unaware of the explosive impact their lives will have upon the world.
View Trailer:
* Medium (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Positive. There are George Clooney haters out there.

There are some who think that the guy shouldn’t be messing around with properties like his remake of NETWORK, a film which portended the vile and tabloidish way “news” is reported to the masses, that his films at times can be overly indulgent and that he used to rock a mullet on that one show with that girl named Tootie and that stuck-up blonde chick who now puts hot sauce on her kids’ mouths to discipline them. I don’t see an issue with any of these things, as he atoned for his Kentucky Mud Flap by keeping it short for many of his films, but I honestly think that Clooney is mistakenly written off by many people for his work. The guy’s skills are wickedly sharp, his directing of flicks like CONFESSIONS OF A DANGEROUS MIND was commendable beyond comment, OCEAN’S ELEVEN is movie which you have to admit can be re-watched again and again and again by understanding that Clooney helps to bring it all together but it is flicks like this, trailers like this, which really challenge any critic to sit down and rethink their positions.

When we open up and get the woman’s voiceover which asks us to imagine a world where 30% of American households are unable to heat their homes or the idea of us having to pay $20 at the pump for a gallon of gasoline.

“It’s running out, and 90% of what’s left is in the Middle East”

Matt Damon provides a nice, subdued, yet tinged with bravado, moment as he talks at someone who appears to be of Middle Eastern descent as they look out a window. As Damon says about this being a fight to the death a much paunchier Clooney strolls down a narrow street as a car explodes behind him. He doesn’t look, he doesn’t flinch, he just keeps on walking.

The piss poor 5-grade Photoshop lettering which lets us know that the brain trust behind TRAFFIC are responsible for this vision is excused for what happens as this graphic goes away.

In much the same way that TRAFFIC had a kinesthetic feel to it, like the part when Michael Douglas is speaking to a lot of the real politicians like Barbara Boxer, Orrin Hatch and Charles Grassley were talking to him, the same can be said when Clooney starts to mastermind a plot to kidnap the same Middle Easterner from the beginning of this trailer. The accompanying visuals which go along the play by play, which looks like they used the same SUV’s from TRAFFIC, is a real nice touch to this moment.

Damon has a nice speaking piece as he couches the entire issue of what oil production has meant to America and what we will do get what we want as he pinpoints what many people think of oil producing countries and their history. It’s sharp.

Jeffrey Wright, who is really one of the best working actors that I’ve seen in the last few years, gets introduced and it honestly feels like his is a character that is like Russell Crowe’s in THE INSIDER. He almost seems like he’s above it all, an innocent victim who is just trying to understand it all, but the whole time things are going on with him the context for what this film is all about, oil and its production and our willingness to do anything to get it, rings too loud for anyone to not notice its relevancy to events which are transpiring right now.

This almost doesn’t seem like a movie as it does a Hollywood embellishment of what we all think is happening behind oil magnates’ corporate boardroom doors.

This trailer takes an unexpected turn on a dime as Clooney, himself, becomes the kidnapped and he the prey. Now, why he’s being interrogated to give names, soaking wet like Danny Glover and Mel Gibson in LETHAL WEAPON right before Al Leong, Mr. Endo, gets all electrocutioner on their ass, I don’t have any clue why this is happening. Although, as the money shots, the real dramatic, meaty moments start unraveling at the end there is a moment when orders are given to take Clooney out from this bunker-type war room that can see him remotely; it’s the REAL GENIUS/popcorn scene all over again. Plus, George is trying to get the attention of a passing car, the one slated for mass destruction, and I think back to the Damon Wayans/Bruce Willis classic LAST BOY SCOUT. I’m not saying there was any cribbing going on here, ladies and gentlemen, but I do find the similarities in the execution a tad suspicious.

Now, even though this film has nothing to do with the Val Kilmer/Tony Scott opuses, opi, if you will, I can reccomend this flick, sight unseen, just based on the weighty performances I can read between the lines here. George Clooney haters? Let them try to be after this year is finished.


GLORY ROAD (2005) Director: James Gartner
Cast: Josh Lucas, Derek Luke, Austin Nichols, Jon Voight
Release: January 13, 2006
Synopsis: GLORY ROAD tells the inspiring true story of the underdog Texas Western basketball team, with history’s first all African American starting lineup of players, who took the country by storm, surprisingly winning the 1966 NCAA tournament title. Josh Lucas stars as Hall of Famer Don Haskins, the passionately dedicated college basketball coach that changed the history of basketball with his team’s victory in this time of innocence.
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Sappy. May induce diabetic shock. I don’t know what it is about Disney and their need to make so many movies which are “Inspired by a True Story” but I do long for the days when they could go back to making flicks like CONDORMAN or THE APPLE DUMPLING GANG.

Things, obviously, they do a change and I guess this just represents a new avenue for them. What gets to me, however, is that this movie, much like REMEMBER THE TITANS (an awfully saccharine foray into the nature of race relations couched in the language of football) and MIRACLE (an awfully saccharine foray into the nature of the polemics which existed between nations who weren’t seeing eye-to-eye) is that this follows the same kind of filmmaking. It’s just like a blend of TITANS, MIRACLE and a dash of COACH CARTER. I’m not the one who goes out to buy a ticket so I am left to assume there is a market for movies which tell the same story. And I don’t mean to be hard on this flick, I’m not, and I am even impressed by Josh Lucas, an actor who is really evolving well in this profession. In fact, I really like the vibe of the trailer. It’s the kind of film I EASILY could see a family packing up the car to go see.

Texas, 1965.

Josh is playing b-ball with his young kid on his dusty driveway. He passes the ball to his mute little boy who is barely able to walk and gets him right in the head. I surprise myself when I laugh but I like the way we’re entering Josh’s world.

We waste no time in establishing that he has packed up his family to move to a school to coach basketball. It’s shown that he was a winning coach but, as the frame cuts, we see it was only in the women’s league. Quickly, we cut back to Josh walking down a men’s dormitory at said college, his wife gasping at the towel-clad dudes strolling down the hallway, as the voiceover saying his family has no other housing choices but to stay in the men’s dorm. Mental note: get wife to obtain employment at women’s college across town, preferably in gymnastics or volleyball. What I like about the whole “blown up” aspect of putting Josh’s family in this situation is that it feels fun. The cinematography has a golden hue to it and I can’t help but feel a certain playfulness with which the way this movie is being sold.

And then it happens. Josh has voiceover duties as he says he needs to change everything the team used to do before, including who they recruit. Of course here there is a change in visual hue, going from gold to a cobalt blue, as we see that Josh is talking about recruiting black talent. Now, it’s a pink elephant in the room and I understand that no one is coming out to say it but it’s true: a team of white dudes versus a team of black dudes shouldn’t make a difference but for the purposes of this movie it is the catalyst of all the events which will follow from here on out.

Of course Josh sees the talent in these guys who no one else wanted, making it seem like they were just ignorant schools who couldn’t spot talent in a line-up when in fact it was because they were racist pigs who needed to have a piece of broken wet hose slapped across their collective nuts, and, of course, the white kids see our black friends as oddities. The white crackers appear to never have seen a black person up close as a collective bunch of them literally squeeze themselves against a wall of glass, like they’re looking at an animal in a zoo, and awe at the splendor of dudes who will, no doubt, show who has the real skillz.

Now, we start rolling through the actual execution of these players “coming together” and we get Josh saying how hard his brand of basketball is; his intonation of this line kind of creeped me out. Oh, and the requisite, the absolute neccessary compent of any sports movie, the screaming coach, being all bombastic for the camera, gets a full-on showcase here as he flexes his lungs. Josh also thinks that having one of the college students’ mothers go along with him to his classes to make sure he brings up his grades is not only wise but amusing as all fuck.

Cue the inspirational music as we head to the end, the slow-mo of our dudes dunking and I am genuinely suprised that the Disney folks decided to put the pink elephant right in the trailer as we hear that this is a true story becuase this marks the first time five black players came out to represent in an NCAA tourney. Bravo, dudes, for having the minerals to speaketh thy name.

Yeah, it looks about as enlighting and informative as the IT’S A SMALL WORLD ride at Disney proper but these genre flicks serve an audience who like seeing padded tales of inspiration.


THREE EXTREMES (2005) Director: Fruit Chan, Takashi Miike, Chan-wook Park
Cast: Byung-hun Lee, Hye-jeong Kang, Jung-ah Yum
Release: October 28, 2005 (Limited)
Synopsis: An Asian cross-cultural trilogy of horror films from accomplished indie directors.
View Trailer:
* Medium (Windows Media )

Prognosis: Oh my. You know whose singular vision of horror really skeeved me out as a kid? Tom Petty.

That blonde, David Spade-in-a-taffy-pulling-machine, dude just blew my mind up with his video for “Don’t Come Around Here No More.” Besides being a poor role model for my eventual foray into English education, his abuse of double negatives left something to be desired, his video for this song became the basis for every other visual which came after it if it used black and white floor tiling, to say nothing of the band’s gorging of Alice when she is turned into that really tasty looking cake. I know, it sounds completely bizarre and it’s like how dudes associate the smell of freshly cooked halibut to their glory days with their nympho girlfriends but this trailer for THREE EXTREMES triggered the same sympathetic response I get when I watched that video all those years ago.

Thankfully, it still jives with my viewing because this trailer is all about the weird.

When we begin we look out onto an icy plane. It looks cold, barren and quite minimalist. It’s creepy. FARGO creepy. When we tighten in on what’s happening we see someone filling in a shallow grave. I like that there is no sound other than the “ka-chunk” of someone scooping another shovelful of dirt back into the hole they created. There isn’t any context for what this all means but I like it.

A woman with a scarf wrapped around a 1/3 of her head walks slowly through a hallway. She dons a coat and, again, it just feels cold. The sounds of the wind whipping through the place is enough to couch everything in the right way.

We see a carnival. There isn’t anyone there but we see the big tent, dirt on the ground, wooden rider where a barker might try to get you to see the Chicken Lady or the Bearded Midget, and there is a colorful box on the ground where, possibly, the woman who was all muffled up before reels from what she sees when she opens the spooky container.

Some crazy looking Asian looks up at me as she slurps something red, like an oyster with a dollop of raspberry jam on it, and, instead of feeling, “Ooo, that’s spooky!” I am getting annoyed with the lack of information. It’s a crazy visual but there’s nothing grounding me to why I should feel one way or another. But then, just as quickly as we meet Staring Asian Woman, we switch to someone who looks all sorts of jacked up in a body cast. The person is positioned on a piano bench, sitting in front of one, as they’re attached to a series of strings. These strings, dozens of them, jut out in all sorts of directions. Is this person tethered to something? Don’t know, there isn’t any voiceover. When The Voice does decide to pop in, giving me nothing more than a, “”¦comes one singularly terrifying”¦” Blah blah blah. I’ve heard this jive before. In between seeing the black and white flooring from the Tom Petty video I see someone who might be the same strange Asian Slurping Woman supping on some dudes neck. The trailer makers get some thumbs up from me for adding in the sound effects of what that noshing might sound like if you had a vampire wired for audio.

We get more discordant images of Tom Petty tile, a guy holding up a Zippo for some available light, a woman and girl holding onto each other because something spooky might be happening (although it looks like the woman has the girl in a headlock position which would be advantageous to snapping her neck like a Wayne Brady on Chapelle’s Show) and a half-dozen more “What the fuck?” shots which don’t get you any closer to finding anything out about this film.

Now, I’d like to say that this is a slam dunk kind of film and, to me, it is but I can honestly see some people shying away from seeing this only because we don’t know what the hell is happening. Yes, Virginia, even in movies like this the target audience does deserve more than just spooky money shots if they think they’re going to get their money from them. I just happen to know from word of mouth that this is a really good flick and so it already has mine.


JUST FRIENDS (2005) Director: Roger Kumble
Cast: Ryan Reynolds, Amy Smart, Anna Faris
Release: November 23, 2005
Synopsis: The romantic comedy JUST FRIENDS stars Ryan Reynolds as a former high school geek turned trendy Los Angeles music executive. When he gets stranded in his New Jersey home town due to bad weather with a superstar singer he is trying to sign, he finds himself reunited with his high school crush and discovers she is his true love.
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Negative. Hmm”¦Can’t say this was anything special.

I think I want this to be funny, I do. VAN WILDER was everything it should’ve been and everything else Ryan Reynolds has done since then follows the same approach. There is a certain cookie-cutter quality to his films, in much the same way Adam Sandler has a corner of the doofus with a heart of gold market, but that isn’t meant to take anything away from him. He’s good at what he does but I just don’t feel anything either way after watching this trailer.

We start off by seeing Ryan enjoying his wonderful life. He is a successful music producer and has the double-teaming chicks to prove it. It’s awfully superficial but I guess it’s important to have about as shallow of understanding of our protagonist as possible when we’re talking about shallow comedies. Oh, and he’s absolutely irresistible to the ladies. Even the ones who already have dudes are attracted to his thin manliness. And this is when we find out that he wasn’t always this way. He, gasp!, used to be fat. The “I Swear” lip-sync that Ryan does as we transition to his past is amusing as is Amy Smart’s protestation that even though Ryan looks about as fugly as you could possibly make him she really loves him, like a brother.

We transition back to thin Ryan as he heads to his old home with the “hottest” pop singer in teh whole wide world, this being an obnoxious as a plot twist as that could be, and eventually finds out, double gasp!, that Smart still lives there. He has a chance to make this right again with her but this whole pop star girlfriend thing puts a cramp in his style.

Anyway, somehow we have Ryan on the ice, battling some 12 year-olds in a game of hockey. This, of course, turns ugly as Ryan gets a beat down from a kiddie. I’m not sure how this all pertains to the plot but when AMERICAN PIE’s Chris Klein comes into the same situation as Ryan is I am just scrambling to keep all these plot threads together. Chris is after Amy as well and you can only imagine the things which will happen from here.

Like I said earlier I am just not sure what to make of this film. You’ve really got to rate this one on the Doug and Bob McKenzie Beer Scale of how many it will take to get a guffaw or chuckle (neither of which really exist but you get me) out of this turkey.


PARADISE NOW (2005) Director: Hany Abu-Assad
Cast: Kais Nashef, Ali Suliman, Lubna Azabal, Amer Hlehel, Hiam Abbass5
Release: October 28th, 2005
Synopsis: The story of two young Palestinian men as they embark upon what may be the last 48 hours of their lives. On a typical day in the West Bank city of Nablus, where daily life grinds on amidst crushing poverty and the occasional rocket blast, we meet two childhood best friends on their way to carrying out a strike in Tel Aviv.
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Positive. I am absolutely tired, mentally, of hearing how Palestinians and Israelis find that tit for tatting with regards to coming to an end of the conflict that separates the two independent states is acceptable.

Just growing up in America you’d have to admit that if you really weren’t an informed, educated adult that you would see one side or the other as the obvious aggressor in this conflict. I wouldn’t even dream of taking sides on this, as I don’t live there and only know what my totally honest, forthright, un-biased government and news media have to tell me.

I do know, though, that I like this trailer a lot. It evokes something that I think is now relevant to all of us as we hear about IEDs in Iraq and the nature of suicide bombers as they make headlines on a near daily basis. What at first I thought was going to be a flick about two dudes, just look at the poster, and one I was going to roll right through, the mood is heavy right from the beginning.

“From the most unexpected place comes a bold new call for peace”

First of all, I have to disagree with the statement. Yeah, it’d be great to have these two states come together but it should be obvious to anyone with half their brain left that it’s going to take action, not a call. It’s all semantics but you can see where this coming from.

The opening shot is wonderful, though. You take a look at this tightly packed city, buildings upon buildings in a valley, like a desert-style Hong Kong in full golden glory. You get an idea of the space in which this movie takes place.

Geographically specific music coats the scenes we see: a couple of men meet on the street wearing suits; a beautiful woman passes a border soldier in full body armor; a line of people walk down a path off a hill only to grab cover when an explosion happens off camera.

The music grows in intensity when we see a freedom fighter getting his picture taken in a darkened room, his machine gun hoisted high, his face vacant of any emotion. We see our woman once more as she rides a bus looking forlorn. Machine gun guy and another dude have their beards shaved. Something very bad is about to go down and the application of plastic explosives to the chest of a willing suicide bomber really intensify what’s happening on the screen.

The two men don clothing which will help them submerge into the populace they are trying to strike against. They have haircuts, suits and nice looking demeanors. The two of them, we’re told, are longtime friends.

Things, though, take a sharp turn when we see one of the guys acting erratic; he’s running along a hillside; he’s almost getting into a car accident; he has some woman flipping out on him. The latter is probably due to the fact he’s told her about what he’s planning on doing.

One of the suicide bombers sits at a bus stop and waits for it to arrive. He has his hand at the ready on the trigger which will no doubt detonate his armament. You’re just waiting for him to go boom when you see a kid getting off the bus. He slows his hand down. We cut to Good Looking Woman just lost in her thoughts. We come back to our suicide man on the bus, this time looking like he’s ruminating on something important.

The screen throws us back in time. The two men, their hair clearly curly and mussed, share a smoke on a hill looking out at a sunset. There is peace in their sitting. The slow, acoustic music playing in the background is soothing.

The tail end of this trailer is just as powerful as its beginning and I have to think, having read so many other news stories or seen snippets on the nightly news, that this is one tale that I hope makes its way to this part of the world where it seems so distant yet poignant considering what’s going on in our lives today.

October 14, 2005

Trailer Park: Harold Perrineau of LOST

Filed under: Interviews,Trailer Park — admin @ 7:49 pm

E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES By Christopher Stipp

October 14, 2005

LOST

The name Harold Perrineau should look familiar.

The name may not sound familiar but you see his name every week as throngs of people study every scene from ABC’s Lost. Harold plays Michael Dawson, the man who seemingly has nothing going for him. His wife left him, gets himself into an accident, has his kid taken away, gets him back only to find out the kid doesn’t much care for him one way or the other, gets caught up in the middle of plane crash, survives only to have said kid still not want to have anything to do with him, builds a boat to get himself off the island he’s marooned on, watches it burn right in front of him, re-builds it only to have his kid snatched away by unshaven and unkempt salty dogs, watches his second boat get blown up real good, makes it back to the island by the grace of God and gets imprisoned into an earthen hole with little hope that his life is going to get any better.

Harold has contended with having a character that’s seemingly beset on both sides by bad luck and bad karma. Whether any of this is going to get better for the man Harold is simply happy developing a believable, emotionally strong man who knows that his life may not be easy but it’s worth fighting for every single day of his life.

Getting to talk to Harold about his involvement with Lost was just a small fraction about what I was really interested in. Here is a guy who played in one of the biggest franchise films to date, THE MATRIX REVOLUTIONS and THE MATRIX RELOADED, one of the most galvanizing cable television shows on HBO, Oz, a full year before Sex and The City and a good two before The Soprano’s made their dent into the viewing habits of people turning their attention to network television. Talking with someone of his acting pedigree was, for lack of a better superlative, most interesting because he has been there, he has seen it all but there’s still that gnawing feeling, as you see, that he would like you to know him by his name and not just recognize the letters as they roll on and off the screen every Wednesday night.

We talk abut Lost, to be sure, but we also delve into issues of how he develops a character that is seemingly lost, himself, when it comes to connecting with his only son. What is it that drives a father who’s not quite of how to be a father and of an actor who wants to create a role that might be able to achieve some sense of quietude in a landscape that’s filled up with a host of obstacles that won’t relent? Harold was generous enough to field all these questions and gave me an idea of where he’d like to go from here.

You can now purchase Season 1 of Lost by going HERE and you can catch Harold on Lost every Wednesday night on your local ABC station.


One of the things that I saw that interested me when I was at the Comic-Con this year was the panel discussion with Josh Holloway, Maggie Grace and others from the show was how the producers simulated the plane crash in the airliner. It wasn’t on a lift but it was done real TWLIGHT ZONE style with everyone moving in tandem at the exact moment. Yeah, they do a lot of those homage kind of things which I think is pretty cool. So what else did they show? Was it the stuff that that was going to be on the DVD?Yeah, although I think you may have been saved because some of the questions asked to Josh and Maggie were a little”¦

Right, right.

Were you able to take the summer off?

Yeah, it was strange, and not strange in a bad way, but my wife is an actress as well and because she opted to come to Hawaii where there is no real work for her to get, like she got to do two episodes of Lost, that was it, we opted to go back to LA to give her time to go audition.

So, while she was here auditioning I started this whole new workout program, get in great shape, and by the time it was all done there were hardly any auditions and I was really tired.

(Laughs)

It wounded up not being really a vacation at all.

I know you’re the father of a 10 year-old girl”¦

Which means there is never any vacation time.

Have you been able to spend time together, as a family, through all of this?

Yeah, we got to do a few things, We’ve been to Disneyland, which is a good thing. Her best friend came in from New York and we all got to go Disneyland. And because Lost is a Disney show we got to get a guide who would take us on the Fastpass. She got to go on all the rides she wouldn’t have otherwise been able to go on which was really cool.

We just got to do a lot of things you just can’t do when you’re on the island. We got to jump in the car and go to San Francisco; you can’t do that when you’re on Ohau. Like, over there, you can jump in the car and go from one end to the island to the other end of the island and go back home so we got to do a few things like that. She got a lot of horseback riding in, some pottery, she had fun.

But now her summer really begins because she has a lot of friends in Hawaii from school and they’re all off for the summer so, when we go back next week, they’ll all be running around all summer. She’s got an extended summer which is really good for her.

I can relate only because when I’m not around my little girl I like to know that she’s occupied.

How old is she?

She just turned 2 on July 4th.

Wow”¦

I’m just learning this. I think I see that it’s all well and good to mentally prepare to be a parent but once you have one something changes inside of you..

You sound like my brother whose daughter is 1 now and he’s so like, everything, that’s all he can think about. It’s an amazing thing to be able and watch.

It is and that’s one of the things I was thinking about when I was setting up this interview. Your character on the show has a troubled, real troubled, relationship with his son. How hard was it to get into that mindset? Obviously, a part is a part, an actor is an actor, but how did you get to the point of where you could play the part of someone who was a dad but not a father?

That really wasn’t so hard.

There is that one part of me, Harold Perrineau, that really enjoyed his bachelor life, you know what I mean? And once I tapped into that feeling of, “I’m a bachelor! I’m a bachelor! Aww”¦I’ve got this”¦”

It makes it really helpful for that process. Sometimes I was less of a method actor than I am as I think I give myself more trouble in my life than I need to but that’s the only way I can do it. Sometimes it can be a little painful walking around with it but because Malcom [his son in the series] is a really good and we’re in Hawaii it was worth it, It was good timing.

And this season I think, depending how it goes, I think it will be a little bit more, once he gets the kid back, after him being lost, who knows where it will go”¦

And that’s the kind of thing I was getting from Josh and Maggie was that every week you really don’t know what is going to happen. Are you really just flying by the seat of your pants with a few hours notice?

Well, we have more than a few hours, with the exception of the last episode. We literally got the lines for the scenes the night before we shot but normally we get about a week of preparation. And luckily for me, this year, there weren’t huge sweeping stories that I had to prepare for. So, luckily for me, when it did come you had to wrap your mind around a bunch of stuff really really quickly.

I’m not used to working that way, in that way that I like to try different things, but it was good for me. And it will be good for me this year to see how creative I can actually be.

I know you have no control over it but do you have aspirations of where your character should go? Like do you think, “You know, I hope this guy comes around”¦”

(Laughs)

I totally do. I have aspirations that not only does he come around but that he gets to be the hero and eventually gets to have some luck. A lot of what happens to Michael Dawson is that he’s had a lot of bad luck. Bad things keep happening over and over and over. So, there’s a part of me that hopes he has some good luck, that some good things happen to him. Then there’s that other part of me that wants to explore what happens to people who have bad luck like that all the time. Like, what kind of person does that make them and then, on the island, what kind of person does that make them on the island? Because none of the rules apply anymore.

The only rule that applies to Michael is that his bad luck will continue.

(Laughs)

He gets hit by a car, his girl leaves him, she takes his kid, he has a hard time working, gets into a plane crash”¦whatever.

Don’t forget about the boat”¦

Oh, and his boat gets burned down”¦What is good in this man’s life?

Have you got to the point where you look at the script and say, “Are you serious? You’re gonna have this thing happen to him this week?”

I did, I did say that when he first almost gets drowned but then when I started to read his backstory I thought, “You’ve got to be kidding me”¦No one has luck that bad.”

And when I found out that they were kidnapping the kid I asked them if they were serious because what did he do in a past life to deserve this?

Yeah, they obviously kidnapped him at the end of the episode, and speaking of aspirations, are you concerned of where this might go?

Yeah, absolutely I’m concerned about what it’s going to be like. All I can think of is what would happen if for five minutes someone took my daughter.

God”¦

Exactly. Exactly. You’re exactly right. And so I’ve got to imagine this is going to be the first couple of episodes, however long it is, and I can only imagine this is going to be heart-wrenching, gut-wrenching kind of agony.

I can’t imagine”¦

Exactly. It’s almost unimaginable. So, I’ve been reading things lately about people who’ve had kids who were taken. What they did, how they responded, just to give me an idea of what to feel but I’ve never, thank God, been in that position.

Are the shooting days long? Are you ever shooting late and having to call home to say you’re not going to be there?

Well, it’s different, because she’s 10 and is becoming more of an individual so that’s pretty helpful. And since they’re there with me on the island, on days that it’s light they come to the set with me and they get to hang out and get to know the whole cast. Or, if I have a half day of shooting I’ll go and meet them somewhere or I’ll go pick her up from school.

The days that I don’t work I wake up early and go to school with them so I just, when we do have the time, to make the time to be there with them. And then there’s still, not just time for work and for the family, but for myself.

Exactly.

So there’s a bit of me trying to make it all work. That’s the part that I get the least amount of and I got to figure out a way to get a little bit more.

Oahu is certainly small so where does one go to get that kind of personal time? To get away from everyone else?

I usually just park my car.

We live on the east end of the island and sometimes I literally just park the car at a beach in-between. It’s like, “I can’t go home right now.”

Filmic aspirations. You’ve got this great thing happening on television and did great things in THE MATRIX films. Do you actively seek out projects you could do in your downtime?

Lost is a particular thing for me. I didn’t really pick it because I thought it was a good job. I took it because I felt I needed to make a change in the way my career was going and what I mean by that is that I’ve been doing pretty well in movies and TV stuff and everything I seem to do is fringe stuff.

The MATRIX films are like the biggest things I’ve done and it did well but they didn’t do as well as the first one. And so what I felt like was that what I needed”¦I didn’t realize it before but part of being a part of acting is how many people know your name and how much audience you can bring in and that’s how you get a chance to work. And before it was like I didn’t care, I was just like “whatever, I just want to do the work.” Now I want to do more work and so I feel like my contemporaries, the Don Cheadles and Jeffrey Wrights, those guys, those guys whose names are out there a little more and get the films, I figured I needed to have my name out there a little more. That was part of the reason I decided to take Lost.

So, that’s a long way of saying that between seasons I do actively look for work but this year there was nothing that came up and I didn’t want to do stuff just to do stuff but I do want to continue to move forward. I really want to have a long career as far as films go because I really love making films. And even as far as going back to New York and doing Broadway, doing things like that, I am just trying to put myself in the position where my name will ring just like when you hear Don Cheadle’s name.

Yeah, even when I was telling people that I was going to have the chance to interview Harold from Lost everyone pretty much needed me to explain who you were on the show before they understood it was you, the actor, I was talking about.

And that’s why I thought this was a really great project to do.

You bring up theater and one of the first things that came to my mind was that you are classically trained, as I know you’ve done Shakespeare, Baz Lurhman’s ROMEO AND JULIET and guys like Hugh Jackman are up there winning awards for the work they’re doing OFF the screen. Is that an avenue you’d like to go down?

Oh yeah, it’s totally an aspiration of mine to create, or recreate, a great role on Broadway. I love being in New York and that’s the community I grew up in, of doing theater and things like that. I’d love to, and not that I haven’t already got to work with some fantastic pieces of theater throughout my life, and I’d like to continue that.

I like the venue. I like the live-ness of the theater. I like the unpredictability. That moment, that night, with these people. I love that.

I love that I’m in a mass medium where if you ask me to put up a picture a billion people all across the world”¦but I like the special-ness of theater. I really really do.

And that’s the other thing: you can have a career in theater but until you make a NAME in theater you can’t really make a living.

I know everyone else on the show has their own animal, their own beast, their own past but since you’re really the only one on the island with a kid how you create a dynamic between yourself and Malcom where there seems to be constant friction? Did the two of you talk and say to each other, “Well, this is where I’m coming from”¦”

Well, with Malcom I felt it was my job to analyze where he was coming from and I assessed that pretty quickly that he’s really an innate actor. His stuff just comes. He just learns his lines, he comes and he does it. And that’s how it works for him. So, we didn’t have to talk about it. You can give him a direction and he can just figure it out and go that way.

In the first couple of weeks I explained, to his mom at least, not that I wouldn’t be friendly but we wouldn’t be hanging out so much because he’s really charismatic and a lot of fun and kids, you begin to almost immediately, unless they’re a pain in the ass, most kids you almost immediately find a fondness for. I just let him know in the beginning that I’d stay away more than I would be around. I wouldn’t be so talkative and we would just go and do our work.

And as that plan began to fall apart”¦(Laughs)”¦Like a kid, he just keeps coming”¦I realized I had to just be really specific when I did do things. Like when I would touch his hand or touch his hair or he would stand there with his hand on my shoulder and I would say, “Hey, Malcom, in this scene we can’t”¦” and he would be all, “Right, right, right”¦.”

And then when there were moments of fondness or tenderness, because we already had that with each other those moments were bigger, they were greater because we already had an affection for one another. So, that we didn’t have to talk about. We just had to be there and do it.

I just had to watch it when I could. The difficult thing is that he’s such a great kid, and he likes me, that whenever I had to yell at him he would just start laughing. (Laughs) I would say, “C’mon, Malcom, come on, man, cut it out.” In those first five months if I had to say anything negative he would just start laughing. Especially on my close-ups. Not his. That? No laughter. Mine? Cracking up.

I know that when my editor, last summer, said that if there was one show I should be watching in the fall it should be Lost. And I know that as the weeks grew on there was an aggravation level built into each week. You’d know more about X but you would just be introduced to Y. When you watch the show is there a frustration level on your part as well as you see how these puzzle pieces all seem to be random? Or do you start thinking, “Oh, they should’ve tied this story up in this place.”

I can’t speak for everyone but I know, for me, I am pretty satisfied. There is one thing that does frustrate me endlessly, and I don’t know if it is you I should be saying this to, or to the writers, is that the script we do get when we finally do get it, you make choices on your character based on the scenes and the lines that are in the script. But then, inevitably, whenever they go back and edit the show or do those things, like “This doesn’t work, that doesn’t work”¦” or they run out of time or, “This is too long,” and they start editing it. And then, what inevitably happens, is that every time you see something, you realize you made all these choices, the choices don’t necessarily make sense anymore. Because they’ve cut them in a really funny way. They’ve cut out a line or they’ve cut out a word.

There was a scene with a hatchet that I had with Daniel. And there’s a huge part of it that they completely took out which justifies most of what I did. But with that being cut out it looked really different to me. If I knew those were the words I would’ve played it different.

So, that winds up being a little frustrating. Or you see something you go, “Oh! They ended it this way now? If I knew they were going to end it like this I would’ve”¦” Know what I mean? And that’s the biggest frustration but I understand it’s part of the process of them making the best show they can make. That’s the part that’s difficult.

We’re pretty satisfied but in every show, every actor, every time goes, “Why’d they cut that out?”

I know talking with Josh and Maggie they both mentioned how close all of you are. How important is that to you, that closeness? With this being a seemingly large, ensemble cast, does your relationship with your other actors impact your performance?

I think so. I think it makes it easy to do the hard stuff. The best way I can describe it is when I did the show “Oz.” And it’s a show about prison and everyone is doing horrible things to each other. The only way you can really go far, and be really awful, is if the other actor trusts you so that it never feels like, “Oh, you just did that because you feel that way personally.” So, if the other actor trusts you and the both of you are really secure that you’re both acting then you can let it all fly and be really crazy, weird and nasty. And because you’re on this island where things go bad and go wrong and sometimes you do this heinous stuff and sometimes you do great stuff but what we need is to be able and trust each other.

And we don’t know where anything is going. So, not only do we need to trust each other for the bad stuff but we need to trust each other for the stuff that is seemingly good if my character and Yoon-jin Kim’s character actually do get together we need to trust each other enough to know that this doesn’t cross, like, into my personal life. And if we lose that trust, I don’t think it will help the show out if that ever goes away, it will only make it worse. From the acting point of view it will only seem forced and weird and you’ll always look at it and go, “Why is that”¦that’s just awful”¦”

I believe that if the people are off then the scene never hits you. I just hope we always stay close and that it never gets weird. Hopefully we can always be close and tight.


THE SQUID AND THE WHALE (2005) Director: Noah Baumbach
Cast: Jeff Daniels, Laura Linney, Jesse Eisenberg, Owen Kline, Halley Feiffer
Release: October 5, 2005
Synopsis: The patriarch (Jeff Daniels) of an eccentric Brooklyn family claims to once have been a great novelist, but he has settled into a teaching job. When his wife (Laura Linney) discovers a writing talent of her own, jealousy divides the family, leaving two teenage sons to forge new relationships with their parents. Linney’s character begins dating her younger son’s tennis coach. Meanwhile, Daniels’ character has an affair with the student his older son is pursuing.
View Trailer:
* Medium (QuickTime)
Prognosis: Next… I’m not quite sure if this intro does anything for me.

It doesn’t convey anything about the narrative, it’s a little odd and the static way it’s presented, no voiceover or provided context, just leaves me feeling distant from the whole thing.

When we open, we get a lonely looking boy, strumming his guitar all alone in his bedroom. He’s not the greatest player since Hendrix but he’s practicing off of some sheet music. The camera feels a need to get real close and tight on the title although I haven’t a clue why. It doesn’t really inform anything nor does the subsequent scene of said boy, strumming his guitar, except this time he has his brother, wearing those 80’s style short shorts. I’m convinced that due to the size of those Daisy Dukes For Men that the reason they went the way of the dinosaur for one reason: accidental sac slips. They were obnoxious and I am glad to have them shoved right in front of my face in this trailer. His brother’s pair aren’t as bad but they are just prelude to the next scene.

Tennis, anyone? So yeah, the Sac Slippers are in full display here as Laura Linney and Jeff Daniels play a round with their young boys. Daniels gets off a sweet shot into Laura’s chest, hilarity ensuing, but I get the vibe of the trailer. There is something not quite right about this household and there’s some very bad electricity making its way between the four of them.

Daniels and Linney tell the boys they’re breaking up. What gets me is that this movie “feels” like a serious ORDINARY PEOPLE kind of film, and there’s everything present to substantiate that but when one of the boys makes a crack, after being told how visitation will work between the father and the mother, about what kind of visitation the cat will get I’m yanked back. Further, when Daniels takes over the voiceover to tell how he’s found a wonderful space for the three of them to share, that it’s one of the best on the block, we eventually see that it’s a crummy crap hole. Again, one of the boys, after being told that the house comes with a writing desk, those single wooden plates attached to a rickety metal chair, cracks wise that the chair’s for a lefty. Oh, the comedy.

As the trailer progresses the older brother has a stand-off with his mother as he confronts her about her infidelity, driving the family to the situation it’s in right now. After this trailer tries hard to be glib, the boy calling their once happy home a brothel, men coming in and out, Laura doesn’t deny anything but comments that he sounds just like his father. Is it witty, is this some kind of black comedy that isn’t hitting me right? I’m not sure but when the younger brother wants to take up tennis and gets into it with the dad the two of them have a giggly back and forth about the nature of a philistine.

I do give it up for throwing Anna Paquin into the mix, there obviously being some sort of thing going on between her and Daniels. Disregarding that the two of them share a nice moment as they kiss I hope you can put it out of your head that he played her father in FLY AWAY HOME. The eww factor is only counter-balanced by the older boy’s run at trying to find a girl of his own.

I’m not sure the world needs another movie that is fixated on the lives of college professors who have this uncontrollable urge to bed their students. It’s almost like the profession is beset on both sides by nubile, hot looking chicks who want to give it up to a wrinkly old prune of a professor. From WONDERBOYS to ANIMAL HOUSE the life of an English teacher must be a hot one. Who knew? Oh yeah, and before I forget, as the trailer comes to a close I must add this: if you do plan on getting wild with college chicks and you’re thinking of being an English teacher you have to, absolutely have to, get a brown, rumpled, corduroy jacket.


THE PRODUCERS (2005) Director: Susan Stroman
Cast: Nathan Lane, Matthew Broderick, Will Ferrell, Roger Bart, Gary Beach
Release: December 21, 2005
Synopsis: Two-time Tony Award winners Nathan Lane and Matthew Broderick return to their celebrated roles as Max Bialystock and Leo Bloom, a scheming theatrical producer and his mousy CPA who hit upon the perfect plan to embezzle a fortune: raise far more money than you need to produce a sure-fire Broadway flop and then (since no one will expect anything back), Max and Leo can pocket the difference. To do this, they need the ultimate bad play, which they find in the musical Springtime for Hitler. Their plans come to naught and the duo are taken completely by surprise when their new production is hailed as a toast-of-the-town hit. Will Ferrell also brings his spot-on comic talents to the role of Franz Liebkind, the neo-Nazi playwright (and pigeon fancier) responsible for penning the “worst play ever written.”.
View Trailer:
* Medium (Flash)
Prognosis: Positive. I’ve never been one to catch a lot of company theater.

There is something to be said about the safety of multiple BEAUTY AND THE BEAST, LION KING, MISS SAIGON, JOSEPH AND THE TECHNICOLOR DREAMCOAT productions which hit sinkholes like Phoenix, Arizona. It is indeed rare to get anything of any great substantive thematic weight around these parts. You may get an occasional Eric Bogosian production but these are usually limited to a one-night stand, one-time only kind of deal. That’s why I wasn’t so sure about the filmic potential of yet another play turned into film. Sure, CHICAGO did wonderfully, critically speaking, but can this kind of production translate well into a format which lends itself to subtlety? With Mel Brooks behind the project you have a better chance than anyone else in the business to make something that’s funny yet has that certain deadpan style which this production lends itself to.

Everyone pretty much knows what this is all about and I am glad that we launch into this trailer at the beginning without a lot of exposition. The first words out of Matthew Broderick’s mouth quickly explain that a producer could make more money with a flop than with a hit. The jaunty music in the background is just right as Nathan Lane takes the reigns from here in stating, dramatically and obnoxiously, that they need to find the worst play ever written. This much we already know but Brooks takes the chance here to add in really zany moments. The framing and the way we’re looking at our players all point to his work but it’s somehow transcendent. The minutiae, little scenes, which rapid fire in front of us isn’t at all distracting as it is genuinely funny. The kick I get out seeing Will Ferrell in a Kaiser helmet outweighs any negativity that I might feel for this being a shameless, cash-in rehash of a remake.

It isn’t a shameless anything as I think this movie is coming from a place that is at once a project of love for a few involved and the fact that Nathan here has one of the best moments of the trailer, a really old woman wants him to fulfill her every need and the two of them have a “moment” at a hot dog cart where a long, dripping wiener stands-in for an amusing double-entendre, just shows that this isn’t a phone-in, either.

Matthew Broderick and Uma Thurman, who, I have to admit, didn’t really click with me as I pondered what in hell she could bring to something like this, really pair up well together as Matthew has some impressive pipes with Uma providing the kind of sex appeal that’s really needed to bring in the younger sect. Nathan, as well, plays his straight magic a second time in this trailer as he comments on Uma’s dancing inside their office.

Ferrell’s impromptu singing is also a thing of beauty. Who would’ve thunk that Gene, the cowbell behind Blue Oyster Cult, would be such an amazing presence on the stage? What I also think is important to point out that because now that there is some Hollywood dollars behind this production you can expect the dance numbers to be more robust, more exaggerated. This can only mean good things when you see a line-up of dazzling dancers using walkers as props.

Let the comedy begin.

October 7, 2005

Trailer Park: UNBELIEVABLE

Filed under: Trailer Park — admin @ 7:46 pm

E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES By Christopher Stipp

October 7, 2005

UNBELIEVABLE

I know this puts me in jeopardy with many Most Favored Nations but I will state this without any equivocation whatsoever: UNLEASHED is the best movie I’ve seen this year.

Obviously, and I say this will all sincerity, the same scale one uses to review Oscar-esque type films cannot be the same one uses for action films of this variety. There are exceptions, of course, when one transcends the boundaries of what an action film should be but UNLEASHED doesn’t at all apologize for what it is. It is a violent film that is predicated on the notion that you can mix genres if you’re at the same time careful and mindful of what it is you’re trying to do. Yes, the relationship that Jet builds between Morgan Freeman and the awkward-looking teen who rescue Jet from a life of forced servitude at the hands of Bob Hoskins feels unnatural but that’s easily overlooked when you notice the sheen that director Louis Leterrier applies to the execution of events.

Jet is a monster at the beginning. The man is wonderfully depicted in pitch perfect fashion, the back-story being complex yet as simplistic as you could make it in an action movie, with the movie blowing out of the starting blocks before you have a chance to settle in. What makes the film such a highly marked experience in my book is because it wastes none of my time. The economy of words, actions, moments are all done with careful exactingness. Meaningless exposition, long scenes which could have easily been tossed, dialogue which leaves you wanting was non-existent to me.

I watched UNLEASHED immediately after enduring the disastrous (for dialogue alone and taking away nothing else from the concluding chapter of this series) STAR WARS. I was already feeling unruly for sitting through a flick I had high hopes for, finding I had consumed enough visual bric-a-brac like peanut brittle and needed something to wash out the taste of my mouth. While I think I found what I was looking for in UNLEASHED there was an element of originality, of passion, I felt was absent from Lucas’ final foray into the lives of his characters. It’s not fair to compare the two productions, one obviously having a gorilla sized club with which to clear a swath through the media and culture, but it seems so appropriate to do so. In an age where counter-programming is done on a sex-based level, tossing out different films in direct opposition to either a male-centric or female-centric filmic event, it was wonderful that UNLEASHED gave an alternative to men who wanted a little more teeth when it came to the films they could choose from at the Cineplex.

Jet Li took a hold of the meat he was given and shook the hell out of it as he whipped it back and forth between his teeth. I’ve never seen such angry, visceral beatings than the ones he dispensed in this movie. I like my films, at times, to stop me from thinking for a while. I can appreciate the complexity of what many foreign films purport themselves to be and, when I need them to, I go to them to get perspective on the human condition which affects all of us. Best case in point is IN THE MOOD FOR LOVE, a story that’s so compelling and sad all the while showing us how similar each and every one of us really is.

Other times I want to see some piece of Eurotrash given a proper beating to within an inch of consciousness. And the best part is that Jet gives it a wonderful spin. There is no way to diminish his role in this movie, chalk it up to his own sense of reductionism or anything else that would take away from the fact that he balances two personas with believability.

What’s more is that the visual palate which paints every scene places you immediately into the world that every character inhabits. Where one sometimes suffers in this kind of film, using the original TRANSPORTER as an example, is that you have a very static, clean, bright framing of the events which go on between all your characters without once ever changing it up. UNLEASHED establishes itself, visually, from the beginning and you have no other choice to grant him his donet, this reality, than the one we’re given. With Massive Attack greasing the movements on the screen, flooding your ears with the kind of music you wished were standard with this kind of fare, everything exists within its own world.

There is vulnerability, a true vulnerability, to Li as he awakens into his adult self, providing some comedic relief in some parts and a muted loneliness when we all realize how far down he’s been held down, mentally. The ending, bringing together both these worlds, the violent and the passive, meshes together in a satisfying pop of fists, legs, heads and a lot of bodies. It would be easy to write this movie off as quickly as it came and left the theater but it truly is a film which challenges the action movie genre to be more creative in its creation and execution. It’s at the top of my list this year so far because it breaks convention, challenging what you and I would accept in your basic Jet Li movie, and it rewards us with satisfying performances from all involved.

I may be off-base in defending this movie like I am but I know what I like and I know that I could honestly ring up many DVD distributors to give out copies of whatever wares they want to shill to you because of your favorable demographic as an audience. I chose UNLEASHED because I honestly believe in the final product. It’s well worth your time to watch it and now it’s unbelievably worth your few bucks to rent it but I want to give five copies of it away on DVD right here in order to get this film into the right hands. All you have to do is drop me a line at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com and let me know you want one. If I get more than five entries to this easier than all get-out contest then I will simply choose five at random.

Funniest trailer I’ve seen in weeks? I know it may sound like I’m shilling for the man who ultimately controls things around here but this new teaser trailer for CLERKS 2, which I’m fairly sure you won’t see playing before the new WALLACE AND GROMIT feature, is sure to appease even the most stauch and ardent critic of CLERKS’ use of the English language. Just click right here.


THE FAMILY STONE (2005) Director: Thomas Bezucha
Cast: Claire Danes, Diane Keaton, Rachel McAdams, Dermot Mulroney, Craig T. Nelson, Sarah Jessica Parker, Luke Wilson
Release: November 4, 2005
Synopsis: The comedy revolves around the annual holiday gathering of a bohemian family that’s thrown into turmoil when the fair-haired son introduces his fiancée, a high strung New York businesswoman whom the family hates.
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Gak! There are a lot of times when I compare a flick to something you’ve already seen so as to give you, the audience, an idea of where it’s coming from. I like to wait until I’m near finished with my review to break it down but there are cases, like this one, where I can’t allow things to begin without first writing down in which vein this one exists. From the top:

FATHER OF THE BRIDE
SEX AND THE CITY
MEET THE PARENTS
CHRISTMAS VACATION
GUESS WHO’S COMING TO DINNER (THE WHITE VERSION)
And…
Every movie could ever think of where you have someone who has to meet a family for the first time, is nervous about it and finds out that the family is filled with a bunch of eccentrics. Let the zany, wacky, unhinged-ness begin.

Oy.

I can see why the ladies like having movies of their own to look forward to and I don’t mean to disparage them here, as I do like a good one every now and then, but there’s something played out about the premise of this film.

When we start the scene is all beset with the trappings of a terrible cliché. You’ve got Jessica going to meet Dermot’s family for the first time, again a movie where you have two people dating for long enough to get engaged but not long enough to go meet mom and dad. I understand there are Shakespearian love throngs where some people find themselves overwhelmed with desire for another individual and there is simply no time for formalities but, God damn, if my girl was dating some dude I would think, if I wasn’t responsible for her leaving the house, she’d want me to meet the guy early on.

Oh well, such is Hollywood.

So, you have the crazy, eccentric family. You have some members of the fam already talking smack about Jessica, who is showing signs of a woman desperately trying to hold onto the CITY look which is either slipping away from her or was just badly put together by her make-up artist, and you can tell by the family’s daughter that she’s out to really make things difficult; this means you can expect some zany situations, if you haven’t already figured that out.

You already have the bitchy sister who verbally won’t relent in making it known that Jessica looks like she was imported from a Jackie-O fashion show, circa 1968, with the attitude to match, but there is also Luke Wilson who seems to be written as the guy who will try to/not to but inadvertently take her away from Dermot. The lingering stare at the bottom of the stairs that he has with Jessica standing at the top is at once obvious and sad. I know that women everywhere find these kinds of formulas the best things, evar, but I do have to say that the trailer does follow the formula for Crappy Shameless Christmas Grab For Your Cash quite nicely.

What’s really hard for me to understand is why the producer of SIDEWAYS would, first, think that since SIDEWAYS was obviously done for the love of the story that the story is not important as long as you get enough zeros at the end of that payday and why, after we get so many people talking in this thing, that Claire Danes gets first billing. It’s alphabetical, I know that, but she doesn’t say a damn word. At all. Who is she and why is she there? I dunno. Trailer Guy didn’t hip me to it. Frustrating. Oh, and the part where all the girls are laughing with one another, after Jessica and Rachel McAdams swore their unyielding hatred for one another, and giggling on the floor? Lame. Every woman who cries at Kodak commercials will find this ending irresistible and I can’t help but feel sorry for the guy who will get sucked into this film because of it.


KINKY BOOTS (2005) Director: Julian Jarrold
Cast: Chiwetel Ejiofor, Linda Bassett, Josh Cole, Joel Edgerton, Sarah Jane Potts
Release: October 7, 2005 (UK)
Synopsis: A man finds an unlikely ally in Lola, a brassy cabaret singer, in his effort to save his father’s shoe factory.
View Trailer:
* Medium (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Positive. “Sex shouldn’t be comfy!”

I agree.

It SHOULD provoke the kind of pain that is at once painful and deliriously enjoyable. But, that’s not what is at issue here. What is, however, is the premise of this film which posits that a new line of footwear is desperately needed in order to save the blue collar jobs of some loyal employees of a shoe manufacturer.

What seems, I know, on the surface as a boring, trite and all together lame kind of movie really does deserve a look-see by the viewers out there as this trailer gives us the newest performance by Nick Frost of SHAWN OF THE DEAD fame. Nick was the other 50% of the reason why SHAWN is so re-watch-able again and again. But, I’m getting ahead of myself.

The voiceover in this movie is tenderly tendered by our protagonist, a humble sounding Englishman who wants to tell us a story. Again, it almost seems enough to make a dude want to go see the trailer for DOOM again but stick with it. The words “Inspired by a true story” always manage to wrangle an extra quarter or two out of my stingy time pocket and I’m glad I did.

We quickly come to the crux of the film in that the premise is based on the fact that a very traditional shoe shop needs a new product and a woman in nice looking heels will be the inspiration which will allow them to do that all the while with Nick being the antagonizing force behind it all; he does that part extraordinarily well. While Nick drools over the prospect of getting him some of that sensual loving, the trailer leading you to believe he really would fancy a night of some of that, the tempo changes the moment our “lady” really turns out to be a dude; a dude who, prior to revealing that information, lovingly situated himself in Nick’s lap. The look on Nick’s face is at once to be expected and, as well, to be utterly amusing.

The rest of the trailer plays itself as a jaunty comedy, much like in the vein of THE FULL MONTY, without the man-ass. The man behind the movement to bring CALENDAR GIRLS the world to us is responsible for this and while that isn’t a smashing or ringing endorsement for anyone here to rush out and get tickets it is enough for me to categorically state that the whole point of the Trailer Park is to point out when the advertising gets it right or wrong.

It may not be gripping or exciting but the blokes who slapped this one together should be commended on getting the right bits together to send to an audience who are looking for an easy time at the cinema. If that means those people get a little more exposure to Nick Frost then I say they are better off for it.


BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN (2005) Director: Ang Lee
Cast: Jake Gyllenhaal, Heath Ledger, Linda Cardellini, Anna Faris, Anne Hathaway, Randy Quaid, Michelle Williams
Release: December 9, 2005
Synopsis: The new film from Academy Award-winning director Ang Lee. An epic love story set against the sweeping vistas of Wyoming and Texas, Brokeback Mountain tells the story of two young men ““ a ranch-hand and a rodeo cowboy ““ who meet in the summer of 1963, and unexpectedly forge a lifelong connection, one whose complications, joys and tragedies provide a testament to the endurance and power of love.
View Trailer:
* Medium (QuickTime, Windows Media)

Prognosis: Positive. Rump wranglers.

There, it’s out there and it’s out of the way.

Before I had ever seen one frame of footage from this movie all I ever got to hear was how this was a movie based on some gay cowboys. Apart from imagining Heath Ledger and Jake Gyllenhaal playing The Bone Ranger and trying to think about what was going to be inserted into, or left out of, the final print was perhaps the one thing on my mind.

In the climate of people having to pull back on the kinds of “art” which is allowable by the true Scorpion Kings, the MPAA, before receiving a ratings lashing I was on the lookout for anything which may have been done with the final print. Since I didn’t hear a peep I am left to assume that this is the version which I’ll be seeing in a coupe of months.

I’m glad that the ads are just like this one.

It’s hard to be completely non-judgmental, mentally, about seeing this trailer for the first time because I honestly was thinking the whole time I was watching it that I wanted to see these dudes engage one another. Now, as to if that meant a peck on the cheek or something which I know would raise the temperature of those in the red states of America I don’t know. I just know that because the movie was talked about so much in that regard I was expecting it; hoping to see it right out of the gate. I didn’t get that and I am glad I didn’t.

The trailer takes a very exacting approach to its development. We start at the beginning and work our way into how these men drew closer to one another. The other caveat I offer is that I hate cowboy movies. I don’t hate them, that’s pretty strong, but I just can’t stand them for some reason. They just seem false to me. DANCES WITH WOLVES, LAST OF THE MOCHICANS, that one with Sharon Stone, I just didn’t like them. This, though, doesn’t seem so “western,” if I could use that designation, as it does a character profile, something which just happens to be set in this kind of environment and is not caught up in it.

Jake and Heath meet quite innocently enough, Ang’s visuals already at work in the opening sequence as we establish these men’s lives. They bond, homosocially, at first, the way all men label bonding when they think of how they dig hanging out with this or that guy. The friendship is there first and foremost and I think that was important to show here. It grounds the rest of the story and I hope people can see that’s what happening.

Then, out of nowhere, there is the moment which evokes that Del O’Griffith/hotel bed/between two pillows record scratch. It’s tastefully done, doing more than just hinting but doing less than showing you everything, but the morning after for these guys doesn’t seem very loving. It’s downright frigid and I can’t/can understand why they want to bury what happened between them.

The trailer does a wonderful job of pushing on that fast forward button ever so slightly. A nice musical interlude carries us through many years of Heath and Jake’s closeted heterosexual lives, Heath spawning two little kids in the process, but we come to the hard part, the moment we’re all too keen and hip about: they’re gonna do it again. And they do. Heath is like a little woman as he tries to put his arm around Jake’s neck, it would be downright hilarious if it wasn’t so serious, and when Michelle Williams, Heath’s “wife” accuses him of doing “more than fishing” with Jake, the man goes ballistic.

The last moments are perfectly constructed, carefully weaving so many different money shots that it feels more like the displays of a great director at work than it does shameless wool pulling by the trailer makers who would just as soon show you the best moments they’ve got and have nothing else.

There seems to be a lot more here and it shows.


DALTRY CALHOUN (2005) Director: Katrina Holden Bronson
Cast: Elizabeth Banks, Laura Cayouette, Kick Gurry, Ken Jackson, Johnny Knoxville, David Koechner, Juliette Lewis
Release: September 25, 2005
Synopsis: From executive producer Quentin Tarantino comes Johnny Knoxville as Daltry Calhoun. Daltry is the go to guy, the man with a plan. A man who’s life, and failing grass seed empire, takes an unexpected turn with the arrival of a young daughter he never knew. With his life thrown into complete chaos, Daltry must try and figure out how to save his business while at the same time learning to be the father he never thought he could be.
View Trailer:
* Medium (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Ah, no. I didn’t think that Miramax puts out films like these. Oh, and Quentin Tarantino is the executive producer on this but I don’t see anything coming close that would indicate this flick has his stamp of approval.

It’s not a knock, I don’t mean it to be, but this seems like a film more suited to MTV Films’ imprint than it does the studio which has brought so many artistic visions to the screen. This film is the simulacrum, if you will, of all that I assumed Miramax was. That’s okay, though, because we’re all here to broaden our filmic horizons and where better to start than with a Johnny Knoxville vehicle. And I’ll be honest about this as well: I loved Jackass. I loved the television show, I loved the movie, twice I liked the movie in theaters, and I genuinely think that Johnny is a great entertainer. This trailer, though, subdues that or hides it entirely behind this façade of an entertainer trying hard not to entertain while donning an actor’s mask. Does that make sense? Let me explain.

We start out with Johnny on television while watching him from the fake television set. It’s all very 4th wall-ish but I assume it is in play here as to show how his role is that of a man who sells grass, “the legal kind,” as the trailer so amusingly points out.

What’s a little strange is that his character’s rise from nothingness to greatness involves him being a great businessman in this small town where this story takes place. There’s nothing really remarkable about this po-dunk backwater but Knoxville is revered as the town’s success story. He’s rich and he has access to a bikini wearing Juliette Lewis straddling a motorcycle but he freaks out, refusing the tempestuous and tantalizing vittles which I am sure she wants to offer up to his consumption. Things get a little weird as we try and understand exactly what kind of person Knoxville is playing. Is it a straight-laced yuppie that we’re to assume has never had any kind of real thrill in his life? I don’t believe or buy it.

We don’t linger too long, unfortunately, on Juliette as we are whisked away to Johnny trying to create a golf course which will displace Augusta as the location where the Master’s are played every year. What’s disappointing is that before we can really simmer on the idea of what exactly it is we’re seeing we get Hollywood’s “IT” girl, Elizabeth Banks, interjecting out of nowhere that, as a former love interest of Johnny’s, he is now responsible for a girl he never knew he had. The girl in question is, of course, one of these good looking kids which are always the case for people who find out they have a kid years later after they skate out on the kids’ mothers.

What’s more, or less, depending on your view, is that this girl is talented and Banks wants to move in with Knoxville for a while, for some reason, I haven’t a clue as to why it’s kosher so many years after the deed’s been done. This girl is also imbued with the ability to rationalize and possesses great knowledge which serves the plot in ways I can’t even begin to try and explain.

The trailer goes from Johnny’s triumphant reign as small town hero to his hapless quest to have the kind of relationship with his girl every father would love to have. It gets sappy real quick and I am still not sure I buy any of it. The manipulative music in the background doesn’t make me change my mind and even as we barrel to the last moments of this trailer I can see that’s the direction we’re going.

Am I cynical or am I too consumed with the recurring image of Johnny getting kicked in the scrotum by kindergartners to let it all go? Either way I am just not convinced as to why I need to spend good money on this film.


DERAILED (2005) Director: Mikael Håfström
Cast: Jennifer Aniston, Clive Owen, Vincent Cassel, Melissa George, RZA, Xzibit
Release: November 11, 2005
Synopsis: DERAILED is a suspense thriller about ad exec and family man Charles Schine (Clive Owen) who meets business woman, Lucinda (Jennifer Aniston), on the commuter train to Chicago. Flirtation quickly escalates, but their fling turns dangerous when a violent criminal, LaRoche (Vincent Cassel), blackmails them, promising to reveal their indiscretion and threatening their families if they to not pay him. With their lives thrown terrifyingly off-course, they must figure out how to turn the tables on LaRoche and save their families.
View Trailer:
* Medium (QuickTime, AOL Player)

Prognosis: Sure. True story:

I used to work for this health care place, I can’t really tell you where it was because I left there after they thought it was groovy to break some federal laws governing their business, but I worked there scheduling the help that went into one couple’s home; the guy was old but his woman was not. The both of them were in need of 24 hour assistance and I came to find out that they were in this care state because the woman who lived with this guy was not his wife and was, indeed, this dude’s girlfriend. Like a page ripped out of Edith Wharton’s “Ethan Frome” this dude was stepping out on his wife, rolling about town in his pimp luxury car with this woman, and was caught in an accident which has rendered him dependent on other people for the rest of his life. The wife left him, took most of the guy’s dough, and was far removed from this man’s personal hell long before I came along. If there ever was a more stark reason you shouldn’t cheat on your significant other I wouldn’t be able and tell you anything more gripping than that.

That said, though, the trailer leaves me feeling blasé. I’m not really sure this would be the one of the first films out of the newly polished Weinstein imprint gate but Jennifer Aniston’s Q rating at astronomical levels and Clive Owen’s smoky mystery, thanks to his crazy-ass role in CLOSER, this movie could bring out the older demographic.

We start out in Chicago (Give up for Al’s Italian Beef on Taylor St.! Reckless Records on Broadway! wOOt!) and we are fed the images that both Aniston and Owen are two hard-working, dedicated family people who have nothing on their minds but their careers and their families. I especially enjoy Owen’s fancy dance run to catch a leaving Metra train headed for the city; sorry, my English twit, but if you’re running to catch a train you’re not going to get anywhere near it by mincing towards a locomotive like you’re trying to evade the Girl Scouts.

I do like the whole commuter train ride vibe they capture. I remember, quite fondly, of my excursions into Chicago proper using Metra and I can attest to the rocking, horn blowing enjoyment of rocketing through some of the most congested areas of the Northwest Suburbs with great ease because of this mass transportation miracle. It can evoke some lustiness, I’ll grant it that, but I don’t think that people like Clive and Aniston would be so quick to pull out the family wallets to share pictures with one another. It feels forced, like they had to do it in order to make you feel that their quick hump later is destroying more than the two of their marriages.

I am a fan, I must admit, of Clive’s sneaky subversion to get a piece of some of that Jennifer ass. His dark and evil voice, which he uses to move in on Jennifer, is not only the same kind of voice he employs in near every role where he has to display some sense of cunning but it honestly never gets old. The man’s a pro.

Things get hot. I mean they are rolling on a hotel bed, don’t they know the hotel staff never wash that top sheet, the Cum Blanket as I so affectionately refer to it because of people exactly like Owen and Aniston, and their hair is all wet, so is their clothes. The music is only a step above a porno soundtrack but it’s still hot. When Johnny Gun forces his way into these people’s lives, clad in a trademark black bad guy toque and matching clothing, and for a moment I am left to assume that the gun shot I hear is the one shooting one of them. It’s a red herring I guess as the music changes and it’s a real fast paced sprint to the trailer’s finish. There’s money all around, guns, knifes, running, evading, crashing and almost every conceivable, dramatic action one can perform. It’s a bit tired but I have to admit that if I am at a loss for something to see on a Saturday afternoon that I may just put this on films not to avoid should everything else I want to see be sold-out or almost full.

Powered by WordPress