FRED Entertainment

May 4, 2012

Opinion In A Haystack: THE AVENGERS Review

haystackheader.jpg

THE AVENGERS ““ Review ***SPOILER FREE***

e1336059317

In the western world, in the culture of Hollywood, we have made films the apex of a property’s existence. When any creative, artistic or entertaining endeavor reaches a certain level of popularity, respect, profits or prestige we turn it into a film, or possibly threaten to turn it into a film, if its isn’t already a film itself. So we’ve grown up salivating for certain things to come to fruition. Impossible things. For better or worse many of those things in my generation, due to new technology powered by James Cameron’s ego, have come into being as live action romps of varying degrees of success.

c79428a9cec6e0cd62cb3fecb244da2a

Well as far as “things” go, The Avengers is most certainly one of those “things” for me. The good news being that I went completely ape-“fecal matter” for the movie. I sang the praises of Sir Joss Whedon in my Cabin In The Woods review not long ago, and here I’m not even sure that singing is going to do him justice. The man is having a good year, so good in fact that his career is probably going to take a different path from now on. Avengers most certainly has the potential to skyrocket him into the big leagues of Hollywood Event Filmmakers like Michael Bay or Stephen Sommers, but the good news for us is that, unlike those guys, Whedon makes sure to take care of character and story first. However, once those are locked he will let loose on the action spectacle with the best of them. He has the potential to be, and I apologize for saying this, a “thinking man’s Michael Bay.” If you remove all the storied history of the characters involved with the Avengers that is what it boils down to: a Bay film where you actually care what happens amidst all the silliness and explosions. Joss Whedon: Man of Emotional Explosions.

Unlike Cabin though, Avengers is “A Joss Whedon Film,” written and directed in full. I’ve been yapping to everyone who would listen that my main satisfaction with this movie is that it truly feels like a comic book script, as in, a script written with the intention of being drawn, inked and printed for Marvel to distribute. It’s very comic-book-like. What exactly do I mean by that? Well, I don’t know really. I suppose if my hand is forced to explain I would say that is has that ever so sacred balance of comic book reality, physics, logic, and tone without ever delving into being stupid or silly. It’s not cynical of its own source material, this movie is proud to be sopping wet with comic book mythology and atmosphere. At no point does it shy away from the exaggerated world of comicdom. It’s as big, awesome, and faithful to the source art form as Joss Whedon is a fan of that art form himself.

the_avengers_by_arco2002-d3h9i2b

The reason Avengers fires on all cylinders is balance. Whedon is no stranger to the group dynamic in his writing and it most certainly shows here. Thor, Banner, Cap, Stark, Hawkeye and Black Widow all share the screen with things only slightly tipping towards Iron Man. However, that isn’t a problem, this is Iron Man’s film and it makes perfect sense. Cap is still reeling from his 70 years under the ice, his rise to leadership is not cemented especially considering this is an “origin” story of a team. Not to mention, that as far as the public is concerned Tony Stark and John Favreau’s triumphant first Iron Man film is responsible for this whole gargantuan undertaking in the first place. It’s impossible to deny Downey’s presence as well, with a character as “large” as his version of Stark on screen it’s going to take at least two films for the cream, or in this case the Captain, to rise to the top.

the-avengers-film-images

It’s an impressive achievement on Whedon’s part as well that Jeremy Renner’s Hawkeye and Scarlett Johansson’s Black Widow not only have presence in the film but actually prove themselves useful and interesting in the face of being over shadowed by a super soldier, a demi-god, a genius billionaire, and the ultimate engine of destruction. Tom Hiddleston proves once again that he was perfectly cast as Loki, at every turn, even when he’s losing he is deep in character without flinching. Chris Evans gives a convincing take on a recently unfrozen and confused Captain America. Chris Hemsworth probably has the most unsung hardship of the entire group as he succeeds in playing Thor with an undercurrent of shame and disappointment in his adopted brother Loki and the horrors he is bringing about on earth. Fans might complain that Thor doesn’t get as much time to strut his powers this time around, but he is mentally focused on his brother and the plot unfolds as such. I think once we get a Loki-free Avengers flick we will truly see Thor cut loose. (Also, I still say that Hemsworth is quite possibly the best casted superhero role ever. The guy just exudes Thor at every turn. Just my opinion.)

Oh, and Sam Jackson knocks it out of the park playing Nick Fury as”¦well”¦Sam Jackson.

samuel-jackson-hamburgers-funny

There were two huge standouts of the film for me. First is Clark Gregg as Agent Coulson. His screen time isn’t long but the little he gets he sells hard, going so far as to give his character a lot of heart and a lot of balls. Second is Mark Ruffalo as Bruce Banner/The Hulk. Now, I admit right here and now that I am a lifelong Hulk fan. The comics, the TV show, the movies, I love the Hulk in all his forms, always have. As a credit to Whedon and Ruffalo I would go as far as saying that with the exception of Bill Bixby, Rufalo might be might favorite live action Banner ever. This is the first time in this new era of cinema tech we get to see the green guy “smash” as a hero instead of a menace and it is incredible (sorry.) That is especially a compliment considering Ruffalo did all the motion capture himself. When Hulk is unleased in this film, especially in the last third of the movie, it takes the “awesome” to a whole new level of incredible (sorry again.) However it isn’t just the smashing that wins me over, it’s Ruffalo as Banner. Much like Bixby, Ruffalo is playing a Banner who was been to hell and back and has begun to live with the curse instead of trying to fight it, this movie particularly furthers that very narrative. Of course all the buzz Hulk is getting from audiences and critics for Avengers is due to the smashing, I’m just saying for the rest of us who love the character this movie has other things to offer as well. Hats off to the design team too, the green guy has NEVER looked more accurate, and just plain perfect, to the source material than he does here.

the-avengers-movie-hulk-600x337

Thanks for reading and for the love of Thor: STAY AFTER THE CREDITS!!!

April 13, 2012

Opinion In A Haystack: CABIN IN THE WOODS & THREE STOOGES Reviews

haystackheader.jpg

THE CABIN IN THE WOODS ““ Review
SPOILER FREE!!!

cabin-in-the-woods-poster

Walking out of the theater there was anger coursing through the circuitry that connects my brain to my face to my lips. This wasn’t normal anger, but a very complimentary one. “How did I not think of that?!?!” Cabin In The Woods, a monumentally entertaining romp with a concept so simple, so genius, it’s hell-bent to anger any determined screenwriters out there munching popcorn.

Joss Whedon, the man, the myth, the soon-to-be legend, how does he do it? That’s what I wanted to know. All the empirical evidence that I have researched is telling me that exactly three to five inches from Joss’s left armpit resides a dark black hole the diameter of a 2-Liter RC Cola bottle. This hole leads to a place that only a few entertainers in history have ever felt the cool caress of on their talented fingertips. This place, this hole, is where a seemingly endless supply of creativity and knowledge of story and character based entertainment is derived. All of it floats freely, you just need to reach in and grab it. Need to create three shows that lead to pulp culture phenomenon? No prob! Just reach in Joss’s nipple abyss and you’ll be writing in no time flat. Stephen King also has a creativity hole, his is located just below his right thigh (the scarier one.)

If it’s not abundant with clarity yet, I very much enjoyed Drew Goddard’s Cabin. Wait, strike that, reverse it”¦loved. Why? Well I don’t think I can fully answer such a question without spoiling the large meaty sandwich of awesome that this film is. Also I don’t mean to hold Joss high and downplay Goddard’s role here, as the direction, pacing, acting and production are all very effective. This is quite possibly the type of film that will define it’s own Horror/Comedy genre for a generation, much like Evil Dead 2, Ghostbusters, or Dead Alive. While it might be a bit MORE or LESS gore/scare filled than those I mentioned, the spirit and craftsmanship is there. The tone located in the center of Cabin, especially the last third, reminded me of a young Sam Raimi with a dash of Ivan Reitman for good measure.

What in the heck is it about?”

How should I put this? It’s a packed-tight meta-horror-comedy with a plot that bows its head to, arguably, history’s greatest horror writer. Cabin is most certainly a post modern take on the horror genre of the last 40 or so years, something we have seen more than a few times in the last decade. The difference here is, the execution is excellent. At no point is the movie “bad for bad’s sake” or pumped with cheese and camp in an attempt at homage. It manages to comment on its own genre using parody, but with no parody of then genre’s low points at all. Yeah, it’s hard to explain without spoilers, give me a break.

The tagline for Cabin is:

“You think you know the story. Think again.”

This is really pointing to everything you get from the trailer, which I’m designating as non-spoiler territory. Kids go to a cabin in the woods. Someone is controlling the horrors that befall them. It’s the “hows” and the “whys” that come into play here that make the film great. The cast is solid, especially with the likes of the now legendary character actors Richard Jenkins and Bradley Whitford leading the way. Their banter anchors the film in it’s comedy-horror roots and was easily my favorite aspect of the whole ordeal.

This film was supposedly shelved for two years, why I can’t imagine, but since it was filmed some of its principal cast have gone on to do bigger projects, most notably Chris “THOR” Hemsworth. They are all perfectly cast in roles that are themselves “meta” yet there is still personality brought through even in the homage. Fran Kranz being a particular stand out as the staple stoner “with a twist!” (M. Night’s favorite character?)

You could say I have trepidations about speaking further on the flick. Discussing this film without spoilers is near impossible. If you are a horror fan, I have a hard time imagining you will regret the very overpriced ticket-sized void in your pocket when walking out of Cabin, and to Joss Whedon’s and Drew Goddard’s credit, neither will casual audience members looking for a good time at the theater.

This is that rare breed of film, like say Hot Fuzz, that reflects on everything that came before but still maintains its own “Ghostbuster-Evil-Deadish” comedy-horror entity in the process. I can’t help but be excited about whatever Drew Goddard is directing next, and of course I’m prepared to be baffled when Whedon blows me away AGAIN this year with Avengers. Whedon, I’m trying to be a screenwriter too, so could I uh, well”¦let me reach into your nipple abyss”¦please?
The Three Stooges ““ Trailer & Movie Review

three_stooges_ver3

Oh man. Where do I begin?

No, I don’t say that AT ALL because it was, as the COMIC BOOK GUY would say, the “WORST MOVIE EVER.” No, I liked it a lot, damn near loved it, and so did the audience I saw it with. I ask “where do I begin?” because I’m tired. Drained, if you will. I am so utterly disgusted and tired of defending comedy, especially in this world of internet criticism. My brain is tied in a knot so complex that I couldn’t induce a seizure even by fast-forwarding Japanese children’s programming.

I’ve covered part of this territory before in my review for Macgruber, but I’m not satisfied with my explanation given there. How do I condense what could easily amount to an 800 page dissertation on the misguided modern day view of how comedy and levity in film is viewed by the public, the web, and critics in general? I don’t, I can’t, I won’t”¦I have to keep this smaller. This review is not going to be about the defense of comedy in all its forms, that is just too big and better left to a more eloquent writer to defend.

The negative reaction to the first two Stooges trailers was one of the more hateful waves of venom I’ve ever seen spewed on the internet. I just don’t understand why. First, if you are not a fan of the original Three Stooges shorts, stop reading right now. For this particular film, I don’t care about a “non-fan’s” opinion, your stance is moot to me, and honestly you are most likely (but possibly not) part of the group that need to read that 800 page dissertation about comedy. I’m not saying it’s wrong that you aren’t a fan of the source material, nor am I trying to force it on you, just saying that what follows is not for you in the least. Thanks for trying to read this review, but please stop. Thank you and goodbye.

Ok Stooge Fans, now that they are gone please help me to understand WHY you hated those first two trailers so, so, so much. My first question is this:

“Can you get over the fact that it exists, and that people who aren’t the original stooges are playing the stooges?” AND If I tell you that the directors, The Farrelly Brothers, have considered this a dream project and have been trying to get this movie made for almost 10 years, and it is not just a quick Hollywood cash-in, but a beloved and carefully constructed love letter to their comedy heroes does that help sway your answer at all?

If your answer is “no” then I will have to ask you to please also stop reading. If you can’t except the above then you can’t accept the movie. I respect your decision, now go on and enjoy the rest of your day.

We are losing people quicker than Spinal Tap drummers. Alright, so you love the original Stooges, you can accept new actors playing them, and you are aware that the movie isn’t a Hollywood cash-in board-room decision without any passion behind it. Good. NOW. Here are the only feasible reasons I could see you going into this with a negative perspective based on the trailers:

1) It’s not black and white.

2) It’s takes place in modern day instead of when the originals took place.

3) Modern day references that will become dated and seem like a cheap gag and degrade the “timelessness” of the project as a whole. (ala The Jersey Shore cameo.)
I’ll address these one by one, and I am going to act as though I, assumedly like you, have only seen the trailers.

“Why can’t it be in black and white?” – Regardless of The Artist winning best picture, do you honestly think any studio is going to fund a black and white summer comedy? There’s a reason it took 10 years to get this made, and why any movie has troubles getting made”¦MONEY. Believe it or not, they don’t make these decisions based on how awesome you personally think it would be.

“Why can’t it take place sometime before the 1940s, why do they always have to bring them into the modern world?” ““ Money. Money. Money. Once again, I’m sure the Farrellys would have loved the option to make a black and white 1930s period Stooge flick, but NO ONE is going to fund that. It’s either this or nothing, you might prefer nothing but THIS exists. Deal.

The Jersey Shore? COME ON!!!” ““ I agree with you here, upon seeing the first trailer I could have done without this, but once again: MONEY. Jersey Shore and iPhone jokes are going to bring in the kiddies, sad but true.

Now, everything I just blathered about is pure common sense, things you already know and are more than capable of figuring out, so what else is left for you to instantly hate on this movie? I’m a lifelong Three Stooges fan, born and raised at the Nyuk Nyuk University of comedy and I’m also a pretty harsh critic when it comes to things I so dearly love. With the exception of the three obvious complaints I made above all I could see was completely, nigh perfect, impressions of the three great ones themselves. Will Sasso, Sean Hayes, and Chris Diamantopoulos are giving their all at every turn and succeeding.

three-stooges-movie-photojpg-f7ffb266ce60bf70

Not to mention the film itself looks to stay true in both plot and technical production to the originals. As stooge fans you should be aware that the Three Stooges were never high art, or shot and filmed by Federico Fellini”¦they were broad comedy shorts produced for a broad audience back in their day. So I guess my question to all you venom squirters is”¦what exactly is your argument for all the hate? It looks 100% accurate sans the obvious changes made due to money and of course the deceased original stooges. Why is this the end of the western civilization as we know it? Why is it somehow MORE AWFUL and MORE OFFENSIVE than the original stooge shorts? Are you absolutely positive that you are even a fan? Please, send all explanations to the comment section.

**********Possible light spoilers ahead**********

The film itself is actually a very accurate and a damn funny 90 minutes. The overall plot is split into 3 shorts that are loosely connected via a main storyline about saving the orphanage the stooges were raised in. A lot of care was taken to actually replicate the same type of physics, editing, side characters, and cinematography of the original shorts. Most things are shot wide and for the most part static to incorporate the three boys doing their stooge thing all in the frame at once, just like the originals.

The physics are “stooge physics” applying to everyone, not just Larry, Moe and Curly themselves. There’s no blood, no reality, and absolutely no permanent effects of violence. An example of this is when Craig Bierko is in a full body cast with a stick of dynamite shoved in the head area, when it explodes, he floats off the bed, smoke shoots out the holes and he sticks his head out with black ash stains all over his face. This isn’t reality. The effect, like this one, was even filmed and executed in such a manner that with the exception of being IN COLOR it felt like it was filmed in 1940. Die hard fans with a keen eye will completely appreciate the filming, editing, physics and FX.

The performances are amazing, not just because the three leads have the look and the voices down, but they are believable as a cohesive comedy trio. The story itself actually is a pretty cliché, on purpose no doubt, but it’s a sweet story with some heart. Larry David as the cantankerous Nun who is often screaming at everyone steals every scene he’s in just for the utter absurdity of”¦well”¦Larry David in a Nun costume screaming at kids.

As for the Jersey Shore cameo, yeah I was dreading it like one does. Little did I expect it to be one of the funniest parts in the movie, it’s almost cathartic seeing Moe slap the tan off their skin for 5 minutes. Sure I would probably prefer it not to be in the flick, but I’d be telling a stone-cold lie if I said I wasn’t laughing.

This whole write up has been way too long and rather on the defensive, which I fully admit. I’m also admitting that this movie isn’t for cynical post-modern internet trolls or Stooge Fans who can’t adjust. Sure, it is a valid point to wonder if this whole venture is disrespectful to the original actors and I agree that it totally could have been, and in fact it was a very high probability it was going to be. After seeing the flick, and especially seeing it with such a satisfied crowd of critics, I must say that I felt no disrespect, and in all honesty it’s a rather harmless, sweet movie that is faithful as all living hell. In this guy’s humble opinion I think the Farrelly Brothers accomplished what they set out to do. They made a pretty darn good Stooge flick, still that doesnt mean it will appeal to the “twitter” generation one bit (I guess that’s why the Jersey Shore is shoved in there.)

Thanks for your eyeball time! Bob Rose signing off!

March 22, 2012

Opinion In A Haystack: JOHN CARTER Review

haystackheader.jpg

On the subject of Filmmakers, Filmmockers, Critics, and Cynics:

Tucked and sucked deep within the underbelly of the no-dough-low-budget-micro independent realm of filmmaking for too long can turn a man (or woman, or hermaphrodite) into a bitter by-product that splits off into two essential steams of flowing hate-fire directed at very different targets.

Group A, or as I like to call them, “Groupay” are the ones brimming with classic fits of jealous spite toward that town located on the west coast with that giant hill with words on it. They spell out HOLLYWOOD. Deep within his hill is of course the very dwelling in which Michael Bay sleeps in his money-bunker nightly, on top of a pile of gyrating women who have been genetically modified to smell like newly minted cash. Groupays have diamond-solidified opinions with serrated teeth attached to them, the kind meant to tear flesh off the bone with a single quip. They are busting their ass to make their flick, sweat, blood, tears, and some type of stupidity-passion-willpower mixture pour over every location, shot, and actor they thank almighty Odin for bestowing to the set on their day off work.

If they make it to the final cut of their film still standing and with enough debt to be able to afford avoiding scurvy for a few months they have won, they are adept vikings, they sit atop the mighty throne and look down on the kingdom they stitched together with After Effects and lots of ADR. Those people, those Groupays, when they go to the cinema, shirts soaked in bile and hard work, pockets empty from the massive Pizza-Hut runs to feed cast and crew, they sit there and see a movie in which the catering bill for ONE DAY was more than the budget on their entire production. Of course they aren’t going to give them an inch. The slightest misstep in a $200 million tent-pole film is enough to write off the entire thing as a “pile of sucktastic suckicide with a side of suckitude.” Now it’s easy to assume that the reasoning behind this is, as indy filmmakers, they see a world where the talentless reign and the gifted fail and struggle, and while that might be the main catapulting force behind their searing contempt, one must consider the possibility that they are also, much like myself, natural born buttholes (but not surfers, indy filmmakers hate water and sunlight. We are the gizmos of humanity.)

"...Actually Michael, that was you that said it. In fact, you screamed it."

"...Actually Michael, that was you that said it. In fact, you screamed it."

That brings us to Groopee, or as I like to confusingly call them, “Group B”, the rarer of the two species, the one with no country, the outcasts of a society that tolerated Outkast. This is a group that until around 3 years ago I was uninitiated of their existence and I’m still not quite sure that Group B is even a group, as I only know about 3 people that fall into this reject community. B, the group, consists of the same blokes with silver-screen colored fantasies as I spoke of above, with one major difference, a severe and intense sympathy for all their fellow filmmakers and crews (here comes the difference) INCLUDING Hollywood sized productions past and present. Unlike Larry Talbot, I’ve witnessed the change within me slowly occurring over years, luckily with much less deer slaughter. Being on the other side of production has made me re-examine the constant onslaught of criticism that seeps from the pores of GENERATION PWNED like needles on a gamma irradiated cactus. The venom coming from the net (where Sandra Bullock jokes have finally subsided,) as well as from those that are in, or yearn to be in, film production doesn’t speak to me any more. In fact, seeing behind the curtain has infected the very foundations of my feelings on criticism, art, and ultimately what exactly the word SUCKS truly means, vacuums and straws aside.

thecritic

It has been said before, will be said again, and is being said in about three or four words from now, you can’t respond to critics with “Well let’s see you make a better film.” You can’t look Roger Ebert in his face after he eviscerates your favorite Bruce Willis film and challenge him to make a better movie than Hudson Hawk. Why? WHY? Well…um…because while it makes perfect sense, you negate all criticism, OF ALL KINDS, in one simplistic statement. It’s a retort that all of us see on the web from time to time but it has to be largely ignored just because of its power to destroy the very institution of criticism. Having an opinion is a human right, voicing it a constitutional one, but being able to actually prove it? (no one is going to shell out the cash for Hudson Hawk: The REquel directed by Roger Ebert.)

"I like HUDSON HAWK this much."

"I like HUDSON HAWK this much."

Now, this specifically is interesting to think about in the world of independent filmmakers. In my travels and adventures (all of which usually require less movement than chewing) I have many a spirited session of movie discussion with fellow filmmakers and have often wondered, as I listen to them claw the ass out of the likes of Underworld 9: Rim Job Restitution, if it’s ok to say “Well let’s see you make a better film.” Is it? Is this indy film world the exception? I really don’t have the answer. The first point that will be made is budget. “Give me $200 billiontrillion and I will make a better movie, until then, it’s sucks. FACT.” And yeah, that seems like a pretty great rebuttal, but…is it? Is anything being taken into consideration here besides the “art” of it? Yeah, I could give you a truckload of money, but could you bring in a better Transformers film than Michael Bay on time and under budget that is artistically superior but not alienating to the broad base audiences enough to cause it to lose returns? The average person, and I’d say the average indy filmmaker, couldn’t do such a thing right out of the gate, if at all. I couldn’t. Shouldn’t there be some respect at least toward the type of WAR GENERAL you need to be to get Transformers 3 made on time and underbudget and have it still be arguably coherent?

“I’ve seen you on set man, I’ve seen your last film…the problem isn’t money and time, the problem is talent, and I suck worse than you, how do you think that makes me feel?”

You probably think I am trying to make some grandiose point about how “everyone should shut their damn mouths cause everything is awesome and made of happiness and pink bunnies!” No. I’m not even sure I have a point, I’m trying to lay out all that has run through my head in the past 3 years or so that has contributed to my newfound bafflement at criticism. As all filmmakers know, no one sets out to make a bad movie, and every movie IS NOT suppose to be made or tailored to each individual audience member during every picosecond of its runtime. My thoughts also transferred to critics themselves and the “art” of criticism, sure you can’t tell them to make a better movie, but you can point out that since facts and/or the scientific method aren’t involved in this world that really what criticism is (get ready for a thunderous roar of “duh”) is a giant bullcrap weaving institution. I realized that my love of a film didn’t matter, I could easily “intellectually” bullcrap my way through a negative review of something I loved just as easily as something I loathed. Anyone worth their weight in wit, with the power to truly critically think about their ramblings knows that its not about GOOD or BAD, it’s about how a piece of “art” strikes you AND what amazing streaming barbs of bullcrap you will fire out of your head hole in order to defend what is essentially a gut reaction that you really can’t explain. Sure, there are people who will violently disagree with me here, they will say that there are rules, there are time tested patterns, there are dimensions and facets to all areas of art, specifically film for our purposes, and GOOD and BAD are real and definable and there’s no arguing that. Well…I’m arguing that. Why? Answer these two questions:

1) (directed at all heterosexual males and homosexual females) Could you write a well thought out review of boobs? Yes…boobs.

2) How do you account for enjoyment?

“I don’t get the boobs thing.” Right, its sort of a weird point, one that I normally reserve for defensive discussion of equality in marriage. Let’s say you are a boob lover, not everyone is, but most people at least are casual fans. You know why you like them, you can research WHY you like them, science, psychology and/or biology and all that will explain to you WHY it is that you just seem to be hopelessly addicted to boobs: instinct. Plain. Simple. Now, biological reasoning aside, can you actually put into words why you personally love them beyond the deeply imbedded evolutionary instinct? (feel free to substitute boobs with feet, or lips, or Alf costumes, whatever floats your boat.) I can’t do it. I sit there and think and think and think and no matter how well spoken and thoughtful I try to explain my endearing love for them all I get is this:

“They…uh…they are awesome for one, and uh…they are…well they are awesome cause they are, wait…did I say awesome? They are so awesome.”

boobs_131967405869

Really, what is instinct if not nature’s hardwired version of “gut reaction.” My love for The Big Lebowski can be explained with all sorts of examples of film theory, historical relevance, script originality, line delivery, story structure, but when it comes down to it THAT ISN’T WHY I LOVE WATCHING THAT MOVIE, THAT IS ME TRYING TO GIVE FACTUAL REASONS WHY I LOVE WATCHING THAT MOVIE. Is it not the same for you? Am I a weird guy? Do the films you most love to enjoy and absorb time and time again only get placement into your dvd player due to a list of “artistic quality criteria” that they meet or because you truly, unexplainably love it for reasons either personal to you, and only you, or beyond your own ability to define in words, such as your love of Alf costumes. All I’m saying is think about why you’ve watched Better Off Dead a hundred times since the 80s…is it because of its merit? or cause you enjoy it? If it’s the former how come a film buff like yourself isn’t constantly watching Schindler’s List, Das Boot, or Ghandi? If you are a champion of “Good Art” then why watch films that don’t seem to really fit into that scheme? How do you separate the merit of “merit” itself and pure enjoyment?

The definition of "pure enjoyment."

The definition of "pure enjoyment."

That brings me to…

“What do you mean? How do I account for enjoyment…what?” Why are we so bitter, why do we hate so hard on these things when they react improperly with our guts? I don’t know. SERIOUSLY I DON’T. Why does it anger us to know that some dude who loved Glitter is at his home right now watching that movie and having a grande ol’time? I’ve admittedly never seen Glitter, but if it’s anything like the substance I won’t be a fan, that stuff gets on everything. Sure, the movie most likely isn’t a shining example of the historical and time tested requirements of the nationally approved cinematic checklist…but that dude, that dude truly enjoys watching it, it brings him endless glee. You and me might not get it, the dude might not even get it, but the question is, is Mr. Dude wrong? I realize its only natural to want the entire planet to adopt our personal opinions as law but really, concerning art and entertainment, why?

Once again, and I apologize for beating you over the head with it, but I DON’T KNOW. It has been a slow process but the notion that other people’s palpably real enjoyment of films I downright hate is completely valid. That dude isn’t faking his Glitter-mania because he is an agent of all that is hackneyed-evil-dreck in the world. He’s not out to destroy me and my opinions, which are righteous and true, fighting on the front-lines of quality and SUPERB TASTE! No. He legitimately enjoys it, and its not some war between good and bad or art and garbage…its essentially a war between opinions and delusions of grandeur, and history has shown that those are always battles that we can be proud of! (the sarcasm checker in Microsoft word froze my computer after that last sentence. I sooooooooooooo love when that happ{{}}{>><<<|||||||||||||||||——#######{program not responding.}#######

Dudes love this movie.

Dudes love this movie.

with all that being said…my review of JOHN CARTER:

john-carter-2012

It didn’t suck too much.

filmjohn-carter_jpg_627x325_crop_upscale_q85

Dooders and Dooderettes, seriously thanks for reading… I promise I’ll be back soon with more “conventional” reviews.

-Bob Rose

June 18, 2011

Trailer Park: THE ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, MONOGAMY, WHO TOOK THE BOMP? LE TIGRE ON TOUR, SUPER 8

Filed under: Reviews,Trailer Park — admin @ 5:51 am

By Christopher Stipp

The Archives, Right Here

Check out my other column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

MONOGAMY – DVD REVIEW

monogamy_mediumColor me surprised at how much I liked this film.

At first glance you could see a movie about a photographer who takes clandestine pictures of clients who pay to be shot in the wild, an odd subset of humans who need to see what it’s like to be shown in their natural territory, as something Hitchcock would cook up when one of the clients takes it up a notch and gets a little freaky deekey, having a penchant for voyeurism.

Purposely antagonizing the guy, the sexualized client and photog share in a relationship that isn’t so much physical as it is cerebral. As, you see, the guy is getting married to Rashida Jones, a woman who is shown to be tamer than vanilla ice cream on a summer day. Both Rashida and our protagonist Theo are the quintessential couple of the 21st century: bland, common, and not very exciting. However, it’s the relationship that our camera man has with his client that shows him how much he’s missing, carnally, by being in a relationship that’s safe.

This is a movie that tests your idea of what it’s like to settle for “good enough” and what it would look like if you took that path less traveled with a partner who wanted nothing more than make you forget your troubles if for only a few minutes. The relationship, obviously, doesn’t go as planned and the fallout between fiancee and suitor isn’t very surprising. What is surprising, though, is how much this story keeps you riveted with its ideas about sexuality without ever becoming a passe exercise in been-there-done-that territory.

You absolutely need to find this film and watch how a relationship can erode in perhaps one of the most honest ways. What director Dana Adam Shapiro does well is to depict these people in a manner that is more honest than it is an exercise in seeing what would happen if two actors played the part of a couple and broke up. These feel like people you know. People you want to care about.

More details about the DVD:

Increasingly anxious about his impending marriage to Nat (Rashida Jones) and thoroughly bored with his day job as a wedding photographer, Theo (Chris Messina) establishes a hobby: he’s hired by clients to clandestinely snap voyeuristic photos of them as they go about their days. Things go smoothly until a sexy exhibitionist (Meital Dohan) leads him into an all-consuming obsession. As Theo stalks her day and night, the woman’s mysterious public trysts send him reeling, forcing him to confront uncomfortable truths about his sex life at home.

MONOGAMY is an acutely observed portrait of a relationship on the brink, a timely tale of masculinity tested by fantasy and fear of commitment.

DIRECTOR:
Dana Adam Shapiro was the co-director/producer of the 2005 Oscar-nominated documentary Murderball. His animated short My Biodegradable Heart premiered at the 2007 Tribeca Film Festival. Other projects for Shapiro include the upcoming Screen Gems movie Holler, which he wrote and will be executive produced by Jennifer Aniston. Shapiro is a former senior editor at Spin Magazine and the author of the novel The Every Boy, a New York Times Book Review Editors’ Choice that was optioned by Brad Pitt’s Plan B Entertainment. MONOGAMY is Shapiro’s first narrative feature, and is a reunion with Murderball producing partners Jeff Mandel and Randy Manis, and producer Tom Heller (Precious – Based on the Novel Push by Sapphire).

DVD Features:

Music video for “You Don’t Know (Nat’s Song)” by Rashida Jones with Bummer and Lazarus
Deleted scenes
Collection of behind the scenes footage and outtakes with the cast & crew
Feature length screenplay by Dana Adam Shapiro and Evan M. Wiener
With an excerpt from Dana Adam Shapiro’s upcoming book “You Can Be Right Or You Can Be Married” and an exclusive essay by film critic Amy Taubin

WHO TOOK THE BOMP? LE TIGRE ON TOUR – DVD REVIEW

***Meek's_RetouchRecolorThis is a great concert documentary.

I don’t say this flippantly or with any amount of hesitation because this film is something that is not only an interesting expose into a hot indie band but it’s a comprehensive look at the women behind it. It’s not just live performances, it’s commentary on the state of music circa 2004-2005. It’s not just a set list punctuated with behind the scenes fluffery, it’s an indictment of those who would dismiss this band as anything short of revolutionary.

Yes, it’s just music but this is a band who I only casually knew of prior to watching but through a mix of film grade camera work mixed in with shaky cam video that simultaneously weaves in different perspectives on the songs presented this is a concert film that needs to be seen by those who would purport to be supporters of great music. Every tune isn’t a winner but it’s the band’s infectious energy and, at times, anger that makes you believe that Riot Grrrl power is still in effect and it’s coming through your ears with hard and fast guitars with an 80’s back beat.

The band’s leader, Kathleen Hanna, is the general in charge and after a successful run in Bikini Kill from the 90’s you can see echoes of that in their lyrics and stage presence. What could have been dismissed as a band just enjoying the success of independent adoration Le Tigre is a full throttle experience that I would not have otherwise known was such a thrill to watch if I didn’t see this. To hear Hanna belt out a song on a disc is one thing but to see her whip an audience into a frenzy is something you wouldn’t catch most navel gazing “alt-rock” bands doing nowadays.

There is a time and place for everything, to be sure, but there is a place to rock out and the stage is where it’s at. WHO TOOK THE BOMP? is a wonderful exploration into the ways that our past shape our present and how art can be made from the experiences we’ve had and that need an audience to see it. It’s heartbreaking, hilarious, insightful, biting, but, best of all, it’s a concert film that wants you to move and groove. I went from casual fan to full-on disciple in a matter of minutes as you realize that there are bands out in the wild who really do want to do more than craft interesting melodies, there are bands that make you want to r-r-rock.

And, if you’re still on the fence about wondering whether to check it out, peep this clip from the film.

SYNOPSIS

WHO TOOK THE BOMP? LE TIGRE ON TOUR follows iconic feminist electronic band Le Tigre on their 2004-2005 international tour across four continents and through ten countries. Supported by a community of devoted fans and led by outspoken Riot Grrrl pioneer Kathleen Hanna (Bikini Kill), Le Tigre confronts sexism and homophobia in the music industry while tearing up the stage via performance art poetics, no-holds-barred lyrics, punk rock ethos, and whip-smart wit in this edgy and entertaining documentary. Directed by Kerthy Fix (STRANGE POWERS: STEPHIN MERRITT AND THE MAGNETIC FIELDS), WHO TOOK THE BOMP? LE TIGRE ON TOUR features never before seen live performances, archival interviews, and revealing backstage footage with these trail-blazing artists.

DVD Features:

Video commentary with Le Tigre about the film (2009)
Rare performances from the tour: “After Dark,” “What’s Yr Take on Cassavetes,” “Mediocrity Rules,” “Nanny Nanny Boo Boo,” “Seconds,” “Well, Well, Well,” and “Punker Plus”
Outtakes with Johanna and JD
Live show in Vienna, Austria (2002)
Rattina the puppet interviews the band at Ladyfest (2001)
With an exclusive essay by filmmaker Matt Wolf (Wild Combination: A Portrait of Arthur Russell)

THE ADJUSTMENT BUREAU – CONTEST

adjustment_bureau_dvdI didn’t get a chance to see this in the theaters when it came out and I am looking forward to being able to do so when this comes out this Tuesday, June 21st. The film garnered a more than healthy score on Rotten Tomatoes but this was a film that seemed to come and go before anyone had a chance to really enjoy what it was selling, to follow-up on the number of people who said, “It’s really good.” People I knew who really responded to it talked about the questions it raised and the way the story played out. I’m glad I don’t have to wait much longer to see what the buzz was about and hopefully this film gets a second chance on the home video market.

To that end I am giving away five copies of The Adjustment Bureau to those who can tell me who wrote the short story this movie is based on and can send a note to Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com. Good luck and hopefully you’re one of the chosen few.

About the DVD:

Academy Award® Winner Matt Damon and Golden Globe® Winner Emily Blunt Star in the Heart-Pounding Action Thriller THE ADJUSTMENT BUREAU

Available on Blu-rayâ„¢ Hi-Def Combo Pack and DVD on June 21, 2011

From Universal Studios Home Entertainment

Universal City, California, April 19, 2011 – A rising politician finds himself caught up in a pulse-pounding, mind-bending conspiracy in The Adjustment Bureau, the acclaimed film coming to Blu-rayTM Combo Pack and DVD on June 21, 2011 from Universal Studios Home Entertainment. Academy Award® winner Matt Damon (the Bourne series, True Grit) and Golden Globe® winner Emily Blunt (The Devil Wears Prada, The Wolfman) are the star-crossed lovers chased by mysterious forces that threaten to destroy their futures unless they abandon one another. Deleted and extended scenes, filmmaker commentary and exclusive bonus features offer behind-the-scenes looks at the making of the film. Plus, for a limited time only, the Blu-rayâ„¢ Combo Pack of The Adjustment Bureau includes a downloadable digital copy of the film that can be viewed anytime, anywhere, on an array of digital devices.

Written for the screen by George Nolfi (Ocean’s 12, The Bourne Ultimatum) who also makes his directorial debut, The Adjustment Bureau is based on the short story “Adjustment Team,” by visionary writer Philip K. Dick (Total Recall, Minority Report, Blade Runner). The Adjustment Bureau also stars Anthony Mackie (The Hurt Locker, Eagle Eye), John Slattery (“Mad Men,” Iron Man 2), Michael Kelly (Changeling, Dawn of the Dead) and Terence Stamp (Wanted, Valkyrie).

BONUS FEATURES AVAILABLE ON BOTH DVD AND BLU-RAYâ„¢ COMBO PACK:

DELETED AND EXTENDED SCENES
LEAPING THROUGH NEW YORK ““ An inside look at how the production team filmed David Norris’ (Matt Damon) race to the courthouse, featuring interviews with Damon, director George Nolfi, special effects coordinator Mark Russell and producers Michael Hackett and Chris Moore.
DESTINED TO BE ““ The Adjustment Bureau provided Matt Damon with his first opportunity to play a true romantic lead in a feature film. Co-star Emily Blunt, director George Nolfi and Damon himself reflect on this new role for the star and the relationship between David Norris and Blunt’s character, Elise Sellas.
BECOMING ELISE ““ A look at Emily Blunt’s dance training for the role of Elise. Blunt, Matt Damon, George Nolfi and Blunt’s dance choreographer discuss her transformation from slender actress to well-muscled athlete.
FEATURE COMMENTARY WITH WRITER AND DIRECTOR GEORGE NOLFI

SYNOPSIS

On the brink of winning a U.S. Senate seat, charismatic politician David Norris (Matt Damon) meets Elise Sellas (Emily Blunt), a woman unlike any he’s ever known. As he realizes he’s falling madly in love with the beautiful, contemporary ballet dancer, strangers conspire to keep the two apart. David learns he is up against the men of the Adjustment Bureau, who will do everything in their considerable power to prevent the pair from spending the rest of their lives together. In the face of overwhelming odds, he must decide whether to accept his predetermined path and let her go”¦or defy Fate and risk everything to be with the woman he loves.

Super 8 Hugs and Shrugs By Ray Schillaci

super-8-posterBefore I even get started, I already know the argument that will be placed before me from the emotionally charged set”“ if you think you can do any better, show us. Of course, that is not a requirement on my part. I’m the one going in, like everybody else, paying my hard earned money, hoping to be entertained. Did J.J., Spielberg and company do it? In a way yes, the talent achieved that task. Did they deliver an original piece of entertainment that will rock cinema history or remain in our minds for years to come? In a way no, at least not in the minds of the audience that has already been initiated to the wonders Spielberg thirty year ago.

“Super 8” reeks of the sweet nostalgia of great movies that have gone by. That is not a bad thing especially when we are taking it all in with an absolute winning performance by Elle Fanning. The first half of the film is mired in a combination of reminiscent shots from other greater Spielberg movies that were far more original in their day; Close Encounters, E.T., Jurassic Park and yes, even Goonies (the last being directed by Richard Donner ““ having all the earmarks of a Spielberg directed film).

Where J.J. Abrams trips up is somewhere in the middle of all the action, when the film shifts from coming-of-age to monster movie. It’s not without its fun, but it’s a little schizophrenic and the big pay off feels quite small compared to the well developed buildup. Director Abrams has proved to be a wonderful storyteller with LOST and Star Trek, but he appears to be weighed down in the shadow of a fabulous mentor that does not do him any favors.

The story starts off with a beautiful and touching homage to those wonderful, innocent days of super 8 filmmaking. Boys are wrapped up in telling their stories to the best of their abilities with their favorite subjects (monsters, zombies, etc.) with their less than shoestring budgets. This is also a great way to meet girls and Elle Fanning as Alice Dainard is the object of affection and she provides all the magic to break our hearts.

Eventually, there is the all too publicized train wreck that the kids witness and a bizarre chain of events ensue. Don’t get me wrong, the train wreck is a breathtaking spectacle; a worthy footnote in disaster film history. But the drama that ensues is more weaving a story that does not matter as much as what has already been set up.

The story from there feels more stitched together for momentous sequences rather than the simple tale it could have been. It reminds me of Spielberg taking his wonderful classic, “Close Encounters” and monkeying with it after the release; providing two other versions that had all the David Lean, Cecil B. DeMille like spectacle, but lost the personal vision originally intended. All the Spielberg trademarks are here; children appearing to have it more together than the adults, covert government activity, a hapless hero searching for answers and great action set pieces. Even specific shots are mimicked from earlier Spielberg films. Bicycles, flashlights and arguing kids will bring to mind many of the producer/director’s films of the past.

There are wonderfully directed scenes that tug at our hearts and make us laugh. But there are also scenes that actually have made audiences speak out loud and state, “Oh, just like E.T.” or “Didn’t I see that bus scene in Jurassic Park?” I think it was actually “The Lost World: Jurassic Park”. It’s those particular moments that take us out of the magic of “Super 8” and that’s a shame. The trailers also do not do justice to the film, giving it a false sense of what it is truly about and if I am not mistaken, there are moments in the trailers that are not in the film.

Audiences will embrace J.J. Abrams new opus for good reason, it brings back a nostalgic sense of entertainment and that is a good thing. But, like having Chinese food, one will be hungry an hour later. It is not a movie that knocks our socks off or demands repeatable viewings like earlier Spielberg classics.

Is it unfair to compare “Super 8” to those other films we have such fond memories of? In a way yes, when the amount of talent is compiled and a media blitz touts that we are about to witness something amazing. After all, this is the cinematic birth of Steven Spielberg and J.J. Abrams. It’s a well developed child, but with no special abilities.

June 10, 2011

Trailer Park: THE KIDS IN THE HALL: THE COMPLETE SERIES, SUPER 8, SUBMARINE

Filed under: Reviews,Trailer Park — admin @ 1:07 am

By Christopher Stipp

The Archives, Right Here

Check out my other column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

THE KIDS IN THE HALL: THE COMPLETE SERIES – DVD REVIEW

kidsOver the course of a couple of weeks I made it my mission to go through the entire Kids In The Hall series in this slimmer version of the series that was recently released a few years ago. It’s been a while since I sat down with the modern progenitors of sketch comedy. Yeah, Monty Python blah blah blah I’ve heard it before and I am in complete agreement.

However, if Monty Python was the pater noster of this religion of sharp and incisive comedy then it was the Kids In The Hall who were born of that great legacy and thrust it into a modern sensibility. Through the use of basic comedic setups on sound stages that looked like anything else you could have seen on SCTV or SNL the KITH brought an intelligence, not necessarily lacking in either formerly mentioned shows but it was just these five guys and their minds that helped guide this show into stratospheric heights.

It could have gone either way but the funny clicked with the audience that was not only operating on their same beta wave but were hardcore enough to support a show that would have blown up the Internet with their fandom if the Internets were as robust as they are today. Alas, all this was, perish the thought, more than two decades ago but this series is, without question, worth your money. It is actually CHEAPER to buy now, along with getting their new miniseries, Death Comes To Town, that the Kids made last year, than it was when you had to buy each season separately. It’s the one DVD purchase that you must make this month if you’re any kind of fan.

I actually have to admit that even though I received a review copy I bought a copy on Amazon just because it was important to support the one program I could watch again and again on reruns for as long as they would run for there are no clunkers here. Not one episode falls flat or is unworthy, certainly you could point out dozens upon dozens of television series that had a rough patch or a bad season even, of your attention but I understand I am coming at this as a decades long fan. However, those of us who discovered them at the turn of the 90’s and then lived with the reruns through that decade would be hard pressed to say what kind of impact this troupe had on our collective comedic conscious.

Watching the seasons from one to five you can see the sharpness of the KITH get tighter and tighter. If you were a fan of the E-E-E-E-Eradicator or were more of the D0-Re-Mi sketch (that one kind of encapsulates what they were going after) kind of enthusiast there are more than a few nuggets that will cause flashbacks to a more creative time in sketch comedy. The reason why the Kids in the Hall still endure as a troupe worth classifying as legendary is because they played with the medium. They subverted your expecations (who here was stuptifyed by Sausages? I’m still analyzing that one decades later) but they, more importantly, delivered with every single episode. Not only is it worth the price because it’s cheaper than buying all five volumes of the previously released version of this series but you also get the Kids’ newest offering: the Death Comes to Town miniseries.

This isn’t a recommended buy, it’s a MUST buy.

More details about the DVD:

FROM THE INFAMOUS CHICKEN LADY TO CROSS-DRESSING LUNACY , CANADA ‘S MOST IRREVERENT (AND BEST-SELLING) COMIC PRODIGIES RETURN WITH 50% LESS PACKAGING, BUT 100% OF THE LAUGHS!

For five groundbreaking seasons, Canadian-bred comic prodigies THE KIDS IN THE HALL stretched sketch comedy to its ultimate limits with hilariously off-the-wall results. With a cast of comic creations only the brilliant– or truly twisted — could imagine, THE KIDS IN THE HALL: THE COMPLETE SERIES MEGASET presents the Kids’ nearly 800 sketches from every single episode of each season in this stunning 22-disc set with 50% less packaging, but 100% of the laughs!

From the infamous Chicken Lady and Crushing Your Head to Buddy Cole and the romantically challenged Cabbage Head, these pioneering, edgy, and ever-charming comedians always managed to land on the stranger side of funny–and look good in floral dresses while doing it.  This best-selling MegaSet, now refreshed with new eye-catching art in a slim, shelf space saving package, includes all five of the groundbreaking, Emmy®-nominated series, plus two bonus discs featuring the new IFC 8-part mini-series “Death Comes to Town.”

Run Time: 42 h, 5 mins. + extras
Format: DVD/22 Discs

About DEATH COMES TO TOWN:

THE BEST-SELLING COMEDY TROUPE RETURNS TO THE SMALL SCREEN FOR THE FIRST TIME SINCE THE ’90S WITH THIS NEW, HILARIOUS MINI-SERIES

For those died-in-the-wool-dress KiTH fans, this May, A&E will release THE KIDS IN THE HALL: DEATH COMES TO TOWN a must-own, all-new 8-episode comedy series that originally ran on IFC in 2010.  It will be available individually, as a 2-DVD set,  as well as part of the KiTH MegaSet.

When Death gets off the Greyhound bus in small town Shuckton , Ontario , everyone in town is implicated when one of its most distinguished citizens is found murdered. As a suspect is arrested and the trial plays out, the entire town is affected and its dark secrets are unraveled and exposed.  Featuring the Kids playing all the characters, this uproarious mini-series showcases Canada ‘s most irreverent exports in a must-see production that marks the return of the audacious comedy troupe to U.S. television for the first time since their cult series ended in the mid-1990s.  Extras include audio commentaries with Dave Foley and Bruce McCulloch; deleted and extended scenes and bloopers.

SUBMARINE/SUPER 8 – REVIEW

submarine-500In the battle for stories that deal with coming-of-age issues it’s hard to believe that a tale about a young man who is very tough to love would win out over a film that depends on tapping into the halcyon days of Gen X’ers would be the last man standing.

Truth of the matter is that the latest from director/writer Richard Ayoade trumps fanboy wunderkind J.J. Abrams’ attempt to mine the countless childhood memories of those who remember being personally affected by the tender relationship between a boy and his alien who just couldn’t stop eating Reese’s Pieces in ways that put the blockbuster in the making to shame. Shame being, you understand, that Abrams’ story about a pack of kids who inadvertently stumble upon a train crash that is more than just a crash just rings hollow.

When we meet our main protagonist in Super 8, played by Joel Courtney who does all he can with the character he’s inhabiting and is easily believable as a good-hearted young man, he’s reeling over the death of his mother. This presentation of information at the very outset of the film should propel us forward in feeling a connection to the kid but this is where Abrams fails to create an emotional spark and, really, this is an issue that plagues the rest of the film. Like primitive man trying to knock two rocks together to create a spark, you simply have a film that is invested more in making us aware that this movie is happening in 1979 than it is with stoking the fire of some obvious kindle that sits before us throughout the entire film. We are exposed to some tired tropes of the father who doesn’t understand his son after losing his wife, and is emotionally adrift, a father who can’t be bothered to get off the sauce and raise his daughter the way she ought to be, and a pack of friends who have to come together to overcome an obstacle in a way that they only can, and Abrams does nothing with the two former elements and only shows up to blow out the latter. The problem, you see, isn’t that this is a bad movie but it’s a movie that’s just good enough. Good enough to see at full price and good enough to take the kids to but there’s not much else to say about it.

There are moments of great camaraderie between our pack of friends, the movie calling back to the days when you could spend a whole film with a bunch of pre-teens and have it be completely exciting, and Elle Fanning as Alice is a delightful surprise in the way she just lights up the screen with her youthful exuberance, but that’s about it. Abrams wants to spend the rest of his time, it seems, reminding us that this movie really is happening in 1979. With a fetish for detail not seen since Wes Anderson, Abrams fills more than a few scenes with unnatural quantities of period bric-a-brac to the point of distraction. Case in point, at one point in the film the town sheriff comments to a gas attendant who is listening to authentic music from 1979 on a first generation Walkman that portable music is a harbinger of bad things to come it not only feels inauthentic but it’s disingenuous pandering. As well, Abrams’ copious use of lens flares is a signature style that now is becoming a trademark that is growing as tired as John Woo’s doves. I need to be submerged into your world, not reminded that you’re behind the curtain pulling the levers every ten to fifteen minutes.

super-8-posterAbrams, ostensibly, smarter than this but who’s to say he is after listening to a script that is filled with enough cliched situations and over-the-top melodrama you wonder who this movie really is aimed at. Certainly not anyone with the kind of taste who can see through the veiled notion that there is anything of note to keep secret, because there isn’t and honestly it’s like Godzilla circa 1998 all over again with the film’s insistence to keep you from seeing the alien in question, as the movie’s ultimate denouement is both facile, disappointing, and aggravating. It’s maddening to try and make sense of what’s really at fault in this picture because, at its core, it’s a fun film. It’s just not the steely guarded fairytale the movie’s marketing would have you believe.

If you’re needing a real catharsis I would recommend Richard Ayoade’s tale of a borderline unlikable protagonist Oliver Tate, played by the excellent Craig Roberts, in Submarine. The story about a young man’s quest for female love and attempting to keep the fire alive between his mother and father. Again, just like Super 8, there are conventions we’ve seen before and this film would be in serious jeopardy of simply being a movie you would see once and forget but Ayoade’s confidence as a filmmaker makes this movie hum with the electricity of true love. Love that is in every way silly, pathetic, sad, hopeful, and every other adjective you would associate with young people trying to make a go of things when there are competing interests.

Tate’s love interest, Jordana, is a surly kind of woman who you wouldn’t think would be the object of desire for a boy like Tate but the story’s strength comes from the way it positions the relationship as something that Tate needs while Jordana is a woman who could leave it at any moment. You have moments where you think that the two are coming together on common ground only to pull apart in a constant battle between what is a normal human relationship and an immature coming together that is bound to end badly for both. Lucky for us, we’re able to see both and witness Ayoade’s deft ability to also incorporate a story of the relationship between Oliver’s parents and make that simply heartbreaking and hilarious at the same time. Both Sally Hawkins and Noah Taylor are wonderfully cast as the adults who are trying to help their son through his adolescence while also trying to figure out whether they would better be served to leave their married lives behind them.

To talk about the amusing nuances of how Ayoade makes this film compelling is to really spoil the secret sauce of a director who wants, and succeeds, in fashioning a world that feels torn out of Wes Anderson’s oeuvre but doesn’t ever feel stolen. If Anderson and Mike Leigh ever had a cinematic love child this movie would be the result. It’s heartbreaking to see a kid go through the growing pains of a young boy becoming a man but usually where there’s a buffer between observer and subject Submarine pulls you into its well crafted world and generates real emotionality.

Even though the story of how boy meets girl and how boy loses girl is something we’ve seen before there hasn’t been a more compelling reason to give it another look than Submarine. Through the use of effective musical direction as well as a color pallate that evokes something more akin to to sadness than it does the young blossoms of blooming love there hasn’t been a love story this good since Eternal Sunshine of a Spotless Mind.

For more with Richard Ayoade here’s a link to a recent interview he gave to some journalists regarding the film.

May 27, 2011

Trailer Park: KABOOM, IRT: DEADLIEST ROADS, I AM NUMBER FOUR, LEMONADE MOUTH and a PIRATES: ON STRANGER TIDES Tirade

Filed under: Reviews,Trailer Park — admin @ 12:47 pm

By Christopher Stipp

The Archives, Right Here

Check out my other column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

IRT: DEADLIEST ROADS – BLU-RAY REVIEW

irtI am a reality television fiend when it comes to ICE ROAD TRUCKERS.

Yes, there is no ice this time around but that doesn’t make this series any less thrilling. Missing a few episodes when it aired and then just waiting for the chance to see all the episodes all at once when it hit Blu-ray this was really well worth the wait. For those of us who enjoy series like this IRT: DEADLIEST ROADS does not disappoint.

Instead of cold driving truck drivers going across snowy strips of ice we’ve got a trio of drivers making their way on some of the most sinister roads in India. Brimming with genuine humor and the kind of appeal that makes shows like The Amazing Race some of the best television, this show was a delightful diversion for the junk that passes for other reality television out there.

The show is concerned with place and nowhere does it look better than in the Blu-ray presentation of the colors that drench India’s landscape. Filled with hope, heart, and true vertigo, this is a show that doesn’t need you to have seen other programs in the IRT series. For example, when the show sees our drivers battling gravity instead of frostbite, the drivers wheeling perilously close to edges of mountains and roads that simply fall straight shown there is a real sense of danger. Too often the staged antics of other shows take on an unexciting quality but in Deadliest Roads we have true fear. A rarity these days.

It wholly stands on its own and was, perhaps, one of the better programs to come out on Blu-ray this year. Highly recommended to anyone needing a show that is honest and fun. Such a small thing to ask for but it delivers big.

More details about the film:

“IRT: Deadliest Roads – The Complete Season One” on Blu-ray!

THIS MAY, FEAR IS DRIVEN TO NEW HEIGHTS WITH THE NEW ACTION-PACKED SPINOFF OF THE #1 HISTORY® SERIES

Get ready to rumble…over some of the most lethal roads in the world with the new, adrenaline-pumping spin-off from ICE ROAD TRUCKERS, the #1 rated series on HISTORY® with IRT: DEADLIEST ROADS!

From the crowded streets of Delhi, to treacherously steep, narrow and congested roads blasted into the mountainside, IRT: DEADLIEST ROADS: THE COMPLETE SEASON ONE, sends today’s toughest drivers to navigate the world’s most dangerous roads, barreling their way through India’s Himalayan highways, some of the most historic – and lethal – on the planet.

Featuring seasoned – and fan-favorite — drivers Rick Yemm, Lisa Kelly and Alex Debogorski, this pulse-pounding series embarks on an exhilarating, exhausting and terrifying adventure, where the difference between life and death is just a few inches…or one very blind corner. Available on both DVD and Blu-ray, fear is driven to new heights as both releases feature nearly eight hours of in-the-cab insanity across 13 white-knuckle episodes, plus additional bonus footage!

On DVD and Blu-ray May 24, 2011!

KABOOM – DVD REVIEW

kaboom1What an aural experience.

Fueled by self-indulgence and steeped in the hyper sexualized lives of young people who are inwardly looking at every opportunity KABOOM is not for those looking for a leisurely stroll through adolescence.

KABOOM deals with a bizarre kid, played with fascinating energy by Thomas Dekker, who is not only dealing with intense dreams of apocalyptic proportions filled with stark colors and hues but is also a real college kid trying to work through issues of personal identity not the least of which is his own sexuality. Blending elements of the dream world, drug induced hallucination, and more nudity than you can shake your money maker at this movie does not disappoint.

Gregg Araki has always been a filmmaker who seems more interested in the idea rather than the selling of that idea. Nowhere is that more on display than in this film which shows us what the real cost is for someone who knows who he might be and is struggling on both the outside and the inside of what that could be. Superficially, yes, you could see this movie as nothing more than a facile attempt to deconstruct the college experience for those who remember what it was like going through that transitory time in their life but it’s so much more than that. This is a film for those who want to know what it means to internalize their feelings and not know how to make sense of that confusion.

More details about the film:

KABOOM: Sundance veteran Gregg Araki returns to the festival with KABOOM, a hyper-stylized Twin Peaks for the Coachella Generation, featuring a gorgeous, super hot young cast.

The film is a wild, sex-drenched, comical thriller that tells the story of Smith, an ambisexual 18-year-old college freshman who stumbles upon a monstrous conspiracy in a seemingly idyllic Southern California seaside town.

Written and directed by Araki (who has shown eight films at Sundance from his breakthrough The Living End to The Doom Generation to his masterpiece Mysterious Skin) and produced by Araki and his longtime producer Andrea Sperling, the film stars Thomas Dekker, Juno Temple, Haley Bennett, Chris Zylka, Roxane Mesquida, Andy Fischer-Price, James Duval, and Kelly Lynch.

The film made its world premiere in the Main Selection at the 2010 Cannes Film Festival and had its North American premiere at the Toronto Film Festival in September 2010.

I AM NUMBER FOUR – BLU-RAY REVIEW

I-Am-Number-Four-Blu-ray-DVD-Combo-PackLet’s get this out of the way: yes, it’s a little like Twilight. Yeah, it’s also like many other super hero films out there.

Now, since we have that out of the way here’s the big shocker: it’s a pretty fun film. I’m not sure whether it was the low expectations or the way in which other people associated it with being one of the marginally disappointing films to come out in the last year but I had a fine time with it.

Just watching this movie about a kid who is on the run from an E.T. who wants to destroy this boy who happens to also be an E.T. He tries to blend in with kids his own age (here comes the TWILIGHT references) but it eventually all comes to a head.

Seeing how this movie shares so much with the usual tropes of paranormal romance films that litter the landscape I could have easily seen myself growing tired with the narrative. However, it’s the second half of this film which really saves it and makes this a decent rental for the cost of a Redbox. The amount of money and effort that goes into battle sequences which really are on par with some of the most fun sci-fi shows on television today I AM NUMBER FOUR is a campy romp down a road that has long since been traveled over again and again. I could not recommend this movie more for the ladies of a certain teenage age demo as I think they would not only find this enjoyable but could learn and appreciate that special effects can go beyond making vampires sparkle.

More details about the film:

FROM THE DIRECTOR OF DISTURBIA AND PRODUCER MICHAEL BAY

On Blu-rayâ„¢ Combo Pack, DVD, Movie Download
And On-Demand May 24th

Disc Extras Include Never-Before-Seen Bonus Features, Six Jaw-Dropping Deleted Scenes, Special Featurette on “Becoming Number 6”, Bloopers And More!

Burbank, Calif., April 4, 2011 ““ Just in time for summer break comes the ultimate action-packed, thriller I AM NUMBER FOUR, on Blu-ray, DVD, Movie Download and On-Demand May 24th. Starring sensation Dianna Agron (TV’s “Glee”) and heartthrobs Alex Pettyfer (Beastly) and Timothy Olyphant (TV’s “Justified”), I AM NUMBER FOUR will be available to own as either a 3-Disc Blu-ray Combo Pack (Blu-ray + DVD + Digital Copy), a 1-Disc Blu-ray, and/or 1-Disc DVD that comes packaged complete with never-before-seen bonus features, including deleted scenes, a special featurette, bloopers and more.

From mega-producer Michael Bay (Transformers franchise) and the director of Disturbia, D.J. Caruso, I AM NUMBER FOUR takes viewers on a suspense-filled ride that keeps them on the edge of their seat as they follow the extraordinary story of a young man who is hiding his true identity to evade a deadly enemy that seeks to destroy him.

Bonus Features:

DVD:
“¢ “Becoming Number 6” Featurette
“¢ Bloopers

Blu-ray:
Everything on the DVD plus…
“¢ 6 Deleted Scenes with Introductions by Director D.J. Caruso
o “Strangers in Paradise” (Extended)
o “Sam’s Mom”
o “Worth Mentioning”
o “Power Prank”
o “Trying to Connect”
o “Extended Warsaw Basement”

Movie Download

About The Cast & Filmmakers:
Based on the young adult novel by Pittacus Lore, I AM NUMBER FOUR stars Dianna Agron (TV’s “Glee”), Alex Pettyfer (Beastly), Teresa Palmer (The Sorcerer’s Apprentice), Timothy Olyphant (TV’s “Justified”) and Kevin Durand (“Lost,” X-Men Origins: Wolverine). This film is directed by D.J. Caruso (Eagle Eye, Disturbia), produced by Michael Bay (Transformers franchise, Nightmare on Elm Street and Friday the 13th remakes), and a screenplay by Alfred Gough and Mies Millar (TV’s Smallville, Spider-Man 2, Lethal Weapon 4, The Mummy: Tomb Of The Dragon Emperor) and Marti Noxom (TV’s “Buffy the Vampire Slayer,” “Mad Men”).

About The Film:
Three are dead. Who is Number Four? From director D.J. Caruso (Disturbia), producer Michael Bay (Transformers) and the writers of TV’s Smallville, comes this gripping, action-packed thriller. John Smith (Alex Pettyfer) is an extraordinary teen masking his true identity to elude a deadly enemy sent to destroy him. Living with his guardian (Timothy Olyphant) in the small town he now calls home, John encounters unexpected, life-changing events – his first love (Dianna Agron, TV’s Glee), powerful new abilities and a secret connection to the others who share his incredible destiny. Complete with deleted scenes and more, I Am Number Four is an explosive, suspense-filled ride that will take you to the edge of your seat and beyond.

About DreamWorks Studios:DreamWorks Studios is a motion picture company formed in 2009 and led by Steven Spielberg and Stacey Snider in partnership with The Reliance Anil DhirubhaiAmbani Group. Upcoming releases include Cowboys & Aliens, The Help, Fright Night, Real Steel and War Horse.

DreamWorks Studios can be found on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/DreamWorksStudios and on Twitter at http://twitter.com/dw_studios.

LEMONADE MOUTH – DVD REVIEW

Lemonade-Mouth-DVDI had my daughter watch this movie and report back what she thought. She, and I quote, thought this film was really fun and that every girl should watch it. Now, that said, dad checked it out too to assess that review and I can say that while it wholesale robs blind the Breakfast Club (blasphemy!) the people at Disney have done a bang up job in making a movie that I could enjoy with my girl. If you’re looking for a battle of the bands, of sorts, that deals with one five member ensemble looking to fight it out on life’s proverbial stage this movie hits the, ahem, right notes.

For any parent who is finding it harder and harder to slip in a little innocuous entertainment with all the salaciousness out there Lemonade Mouth is harmless fun and makes me think back to the days when there was more attention given to building up kids’ self-esteem rather than pitting them against one another in order to create conflict.

Look, this isn’t going to win any awards for greatness but in terms of enjoyment this gets a thumbs up from the old man, if you ask me.

More details about the film:

Themes of believing in yourself, following your dreams, celebrating family and staying true to yourself are explored in the triumphant, music-driven “Lemonade Mouth,” a Disney Channel Original Movie based on the book of the same name, set to premiere on Disney Channel.

Geared towards kids, tweens and families, “Lemonade Mouth” tells the story of how a powerhouse band came to be after five uncelebrated students with a passion for music find each other and ultimately become The Voice of their generation.

Directed by award winning film director Patricia Riggen (“La Misma Luna”) and executive-produced by Debra Martin Chase (“The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants,” Disney Channel’s “The Cheetah Girls” movies), the movie showcases a remarkably talented cast led by popular stars of Disney Channel hits: Bridgit Mendler (“Good Luck Charlie”) as lead vocalist Olivia White, Adam Hicks (Disney XD’s “Zeke and Luther”) as keyboardist Wen Giford, Hayley Kiyoko (“Wizards of Waverly Place”) as electric guitarist Stella Yamada, Naomi Scott (Disney Channel UK’s “Life Bites”) as bass guitarist Mohini, and newcomer Blake Michael (who landed the role via an open casting call) as percussionist Charlie Delgado. Also starring are Nick Roux (“The Suite Life on Deck”) as Scott Pickett, Chris Brochu (“Soul Surfer”) as Ray Beach, Tisha Campbell-Martin (“My Wife and Kids”) as music teacher Miss Reznick and Christopher McDonald (“Boardwalk Empire”) as Principal Brenigan.

Eighteen year-old Adam Hicks has songwriting credits on three of the music tracks, marking the first time a cast member has written a song performed in a Disney Channel Original Movie.

“Lemonade Mouth” introduces an unlikely ensemble of five students ““ Olivia, Wen, Stella, Mohini and Charlie ““ who, after meeting in detention, gradually realize their shared musical connection and belief that it’s time for the students of Mesa High to stand up and be heard on things big and small (ranging from the school principal’s exclusive support of the athletic programs to the removal of the popular organic lemonade from the cafeteria). Ultimately, as they open up to each other and form friendships, they start a band – Lemonade Mouth ““that soon resonates with students sidelined by the high school elite. However, not everyone in the school is ready to cheer them on, especially since the popular rock group Mudslide Crush is determined to maintain their headline status and win the coveted Rising Star music competition at Mesa High.

Based on the book Lemonade Mouth by Mark Peter Hughes, the script was written by April Blair, and is directed by award-winning Patricia Riggen (“La Misma Luna” aka “Under the Same Moon”), executive-produced by Debra Martin Chase (“The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants,” Disney Channel’s “The Cheetah Girls” movies), co-produced by Gaylyn Fraiche (“Just Wright,” “Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants 2″³) and choreographed by Chris Scott (“So You Think You Can Dance”). “Lemonade Mouth” was filmed on location in Albuquerque, New Mexico, and is a production of GWAVE Productions, LLC.

Thar She Blows or How Disney Cannibalized a Great Novel, Developed Indigestion and Shot out a CRAPTACULAR! By Ray Schillaci

pirates-of-the-caribbean-on-stranger-tides-movie-poster-02Let me start off by saying I liked the (not so) original “Pirates of the Caribbean,” even though at the time I was not happy that the powers that be had lifted some great material out of one of my all time favorite novels by Tim Powers, “On Stranger Tides”. The two pompous productions with their flimsy story lines that followed continued to take liberties with this great book. Then I came to find out that Powers, who wrote OST in 1987, had sold the rights to his wondrous novel to Disney. Lo and behold the churning and merging of one of their most popular rides with one of the best fantasy/adventure stories written was to become a franchise. Of course, after three big hits, Disney felt the well might be dry. But like the pirates they are, they continued to pillage and pick whatever meat was left on the bones of their property.

Previous director, Gore Verbinski must have seen the rocks ahead before this ship was about to crash so he abandoned it without hesitation. Johnny Depp, on the other hand, grabbed a life preserver full of money to float away to his pay day while sailing through lines like the monkey over the masts with its precious doubloon. As good as Geoffrey Rush is, he should have kept the dignity he had going with his prestige products and forsaken the harpies’ from Mäuse Kamp.

The greedy execs at Disney saw nothing wrong in dipping into their treasure chest one more time. After all, the crowds were still lining up at the Pirates ride at Disneyland. People still had an appetite for Captain Jack Sparrow.

It didn’t matter that they had cannibalized the property and nearly all that was left (in their one blind eye) was Blackbeard, mermaids and zombie pirates. I can hear the marketing exec before the production was green lit, “Heck, zombies are the new vampire. A TV show already has the franchise!” What they did not realize was when they finally opened that dead man’s chest all that was left were cobwebs and that is what Marshall and company has delivered us with a Captain Jack Sparrow wink and a smile.

Disney, in their infinite wisdom, hired Rob Marshall to commandeer this bloated production. They did it under the auspices of “from the Director of Chicago”. Never mind that it was eight years ago since his last hit. Oh, and they neglected to mention he was also responsible for 2009’s biggest yawn fest, “Nine,” a critical and box office fiasco.

“Pirates…” starts off promising with a foreboding omen fished from the sea and a wily Jack Sparrow posing as a magistrate during a friend’s trial. From there what poses as action or adventure starts up and comes across as tiring as watching Depp take the lead with his character. He looks like he is practically sleepwalking through the role. Nearly gone are the nuances that made Jack so much fun to watch. They only show up occasionally to be poked fun at. Sad to say it’s a flat performance that is as tiresome as director Rob Marshall’s stagey theatrics.

The action sequences can all be summed up in one overly dragged out scene from the second “Pirates…” movie ““ the ridiculous water wheel fight. It was a stupid staged scene that had taken every ounce of spontaneity out of that picture and Marshall seems to have repeated that process with nearly every action sequence. From the moment Sparrow is captured in London, his escape, the fight between the two Jacks and through every weighed down battle, Marshall proves he is far from adept at handling big adventure. In fact, one could probably run the Geena Davis trashed “Cutthroat Island” next to the new “Pirates” movie and one would not be able to tell the difference in the handling of either one of them.

Characters are thin to the point of non-descript and plot holes abound thanks to the lazy writing and directing. Some actors show promise, but they are quick to be walked off the plank for the sake of keeping a fast pace. Otherwise, the average audience may discover how they have been cheated with a bare bones story lacking anything resembling originality.

If there are any jewels to be found in this production it is Ian McShane as the dreaded Blackbeard. Unfortunately, that most interesting character is neutered as well. You can see where McShane is going and one wants to follow him as probably the most interesting one of the bunch, but God forbid any attempt of depth be found in a POTC movie. In fact, Blackbeard is probably the most promising character these films have introduced since Davey Jones, another under used character and actor, Bill Nighy.

Penelope Cruz does prove fetching as Jack’s ex-lover and is a suitable replacement for Keira Knightly. Cruz is far more fun and enjoyable to watch, but once again, saddled with a character not fully realized. The zombie pirates are a complete throwaway along with the hints of voodoo practice. Speaking of throwaways; the dozen or so characters that dart in and out of the movie barely have their names remembered in our mind. So, when somebody dies, we don’t care.

The mermaids are probably the most interesting part of the story with an alluring introduction set up with Gemma Ward. I would have given anything to see a stronger story with Blackbeard and the first mermaid. Ward’s performance (as short as it is) is hypnotic and sets the stage for a steaminess that the franchise rarely has portrayed.

Astrid Berges-Frisbey as Syrena, the captured mermaid is wonderfully mysterious and inviting in her portrayal as well. Her damsel/fish in distress is probably the only emotion captured beautifully in this otherwise cold film. Sadly, whatever is intimidated between her and the underwritten character of Philip, played honorably by Sam Claflin, becomes lost in the shuffle with nothing ever explained as to what happens to the both of them.

Had Disney set its ego aside and originally did the book instead of giving us a movie adapted for their famous ride we would have had the greatest adventure ever put on film. It could have surpassed anything Lucas or Spielberg ever developed. Instead, we get possibly the most bumbling and funny pirate since Bob Hope on a peg leg and run the character into the ground by the time we hit round two.

At the end of the picture, I could not help but feel irritated when credit is given to two time fantasy award winning author Tim Powers as a story suggested by him even though this may be true. “POTC: On Stranger Tides” bears little resemblance to Powers’ novel, but there would have never been a franchise if it were not for the purchase of OTS. I only hope for Mr. Powers’ sake that he was paid handsomely. I would suggest any of you out there looking for a great read, pick up his book ASAP.

In the end; the franchise continues to kill at the box office, a fifth screenplay has already been written, waiting for Mr. Depp to commit and the audience debates whether or not a POTC movie seen in 3D is worth shelling out a few more doubloons to get their timbers shivered. Also, it comes right down to the kids. Will they continue to come out in waves after this weekend or will the movie take a well deserved dip? My kids were divided. My 17 year-old was disappointed, sighting a lot of unanswered questions, lack of purpose of the characters and not being thrilled that Jack Sparrow was the lead. My 11 year-old loved it. He reveled in the piratry, locations, the “awesome” ships, mermaids, Jack Sparrow and Blackbeard and did not care too much about what the story was about ““ just like the filmmakers.

May 13, 2011

Trailer Park: BRIDESMAIDS, THE LAKE EFFECT, THE DEAD INSIDE, WILD HORSE WILD RIDE, THESPIANS

Filed under: Reviews,Trailer Park — Tags: , — admin @ 3:09 am

By Christopher Stipp

The Archives, Right Here

Check out my other column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

BRIDESMAIDS – REVIEW

bridesmaids_poster

If ever there was a movie that could make a statement against the maligned “Chick Flicks” moniker this could be the one. For all the awfulness that movies like VALENTINE’S DAY or LEAP YEAR or GOING THE DISTANCE brought into the lives of women who wrongly assumed this was about as good as it’s going to get for them, a paid admission to this film will send a message that there needs to be more movies like this and they all need Kristen Wiig to oversee them. For if this Svengali can weave a tale that deftly splices the best parts of gross-out comedy, romance, female empowerment, yet wrap it up in a story that is at the same time intelligent and respects the audience it’s talking to then there is no stopping this woman.

And make no mistake about it, this is Kristen Wiig’s film. We can all realize this is an ensemble film and that every woman in this movie acquits themselves quite well as they bring the funny but this was Wiig’s opportunity to not only craft the story but embody it fully on screen. She is the accessory that brings this outfit together.

This movie is the scrappy sibling to the movies like MONSTER-IN-LAW that supposes so much about the lives of women who are on the verge of getting married but gets it all wrong thanks to a cadre of individuals that believed showing women as they think they want to be, instead of who they are, is entertainment. Wiig tries hard, and succeeds gloriously, in depicting a real woman who has real ambitions, real needs, and real emotions. From the awful roommates she shares most of the film with to the ruffled sofa you would only see by actually venturing into the wilds of the Midwest where comfort trumps class at her mother’s house there are echos of reality that feel comforting. This comfort only heightens the comedic effect whereby Wiig becomes an “everywoman”, someone who doesn’t have the luxury of being created out of whole cloth, imbued with enough opulence that we can forget she’s a real 30-something who is trying to eke out an existence that doesn’t seem to be going anywhere.

And where she is going is beset on all sides by a truth that life does not play out like it does in the movies. There are no chance encounters with men who look freshly coiffed from a Kenneth Cole photo shoot with teeth that shame even the whitest Chicklets with hearts brimming with secret desire. No, we get Jon Hamm who plays an understated and horrifically obnoxious pig of a man who Wiig genuinely wants in her life. He can’t be changed but it’s the hope that she has which gives the moments these two have on screen the kind of comedic fuel that helps establish the film’s boundaries. Which is to say that it’s going to be crass, lewd but not without heart. We see more of what’s on the inside of this film thanks to Maya Rudolph who turns a best friend role into something special. The chemistry that is usually reserved for women and their male counterparts also rings true for these two women. We believe this relationship exists, and we have to believe it, because without a believable bond the entire emotional thrust of the film’s central theme collapses into one artificial set up after another. We can buy that Wiig really wants to do what she can to make her best friend’s wedding perfect and all the gross out, drunken antics that follow are merely bad luck. Hence, that’s what is really special about this film.

It’s a comedy that simply could have been one zany escapade after another but the writing is sharp enough to take the tougher route and inject a genuine heart at the center of it all. Wiig and the comedic abilities of the other maids in the bridal party help to create such chaos that when we meet Chris O’Dowd it is a brilliant moment in the film as he provides the first of many emotional anchors that help to ground the film in a world not unlike our own. O’Dowd is a curious choice because he’s not classically beautiful (See Kenneth Cole above) but he’s the only logical and perfect choice based on the world that Wiig and co-writer Annie Mumolo have crafted. It’s an honest choice in a world where Wiig moves back home and shacks up in the sewing room. The film focuses on small details but the silliness and the comedy that comes out of so many improbable situations just works because of the writing.

By the end, when things go the way they should according to every romantic comedy, we don’t feel like we’ve been given a movie that was built by a formula. Even though there are beats you would find in any Kate Hudson film starring a shirtless Matthew McConaughey, Wiig deconstructs those elements and makes them work on her terms. She subverts the expectations of what a movie like this ought to be and makes a movie that speaks to an honesty of the heart you simply don’t find much of nowadays where it seems that the more gross-out you can make a movie the better, to hell with the characters. It’s all about character in this film and it’s because the actors here it that this movie is one of the best reasons men (and women) will have in making it known that we will not stand for formulaic, and shirtless, films of this variety.

The Lake Effect with Wild Horses and the Dead Inside By Ray Schillaci

As mentioned in my last review of the Phoenix Film Festival (April 15th, FRED Entertainment), there were a couple of other films that garnered awards that I did not have the chance to see. Last weekend I was fortunate enough to have the Phoenix Film Foundation lend me a few screeners so I could play catch up with some of the best from their festival. Each one of these films is a stand out, although I am on the fence with one that could have a target audience akin to “Repo; the Genetic Opera,” but more about that in a moment.

Also, two out of the three films had stars that had an uncanny resemblance to other better known and bigger stars. The funny thing is; the leads of these independents were more appealing and provide a far more down to earth quality than the superstars of today. One in particular really struck a chord in the winner of the Best Ensemble & Best Screenplay award.

2010_01_2220lakeeffect_poster“The Lake Effect” is most notable for its sincerity and light humor at an awkward moment in several lives. Director/writer Tara Miele delivers a story with wit and wisdom and keeps a far distance from the too smart dialogue associated with another pregnant teen movie, “Juno”. There are bound to be comparisons and it can’t be helped in the beginning, but somewhere after the first twenty minutes we are caught up in the lives of these very real people.

Ross Partridge as Rob is so likeable as the 40 something man-child who is dealing not only with commitment issues and a younger wife that yearns to have his child, but also gets blindsided by a visit from his estranged 18 year-old pregnant daughter. All of this converges on him while he is on the brink of a big business deal and inherits a lake house in need of repair which stands as a wonderful metaphor for everyone involved. With Ross’ ex-wife having kicked their daughter out of her house, Ross and his new wife take on a responsibility with both light comic and dramatic moments.

The cast is a pure pleasure the way director Miele has guided them through a touching labyrinth of emotions. Ross Partridge has a striking resemblance to a younger Mel Gibson, but sans any glibness on his part that Gibson was more noted for in his earlier career. Partridge has captured the pulse of the frustration of not being sure what one wants in life and not in a hurry to get to it either.

Also, playing various levels of frustration beautifully is Tara Summer as Ross’ new wife, Natalie. Summer immerses us subtlety in her psychological pain and transference of motherhood as she attempts to care for Ross’ daughter. Then there is the turnkey, Kay Panabaker as Celia the estranged pregnant daughter. Young Panabaker roles with the nuances that writer Tara Miele has provided with this character. Panabaker underplays the role with a thought-provoking alacrity that dismisses any comparisons to Ellen Page’s “Juno”. It’s not that she is better, but she delivers a well rounded (pardon the pun) performance with grace and style that is very much appreciated and has one wrapped up with her by the end of the film.

wild-horse-wild-ride-image-2“Wild Horse, Wild Ride” provides us with a rare look into 100 wild Mustangs who are given a chance to lead better lives through a contest, “The Extreme Mustang Makeover,” that challenges 100 trainers in 100 days. This is a film for anyone who loves animals and if you are not an animal lover, you may turn into one after this film. Directors, Alex Dawson & Greg Gricus have given us a wondrous ode to the magnificence of these wonderful creatures and their brief yet important relationship with the special people that have dedicated themselves to them for such a short period of time.

In my opinion, this had to run a neck and neck race for winner of Best Documentary with “Thespians’ winning by a nose. But “WHWR” did not walk away empty handed. Aside from the packed theaters and immense praise from audiences, it also took home a well deserved Best Cinematography award. Gricus, who doubles up as producer and cinematographer, paints a beautiful canvas that sweeps us away from beginning to end.

From the capture of the Mustangs to the introduction of a select group of trainers and the eventual contest, “Wild Horse, Wild Ride” provides an exhilarating journey of man (or woman) bonding with nature. Each trainer has a style of his/her own that is fascinating and sometimes endearing. We get to know these people and their genuine care for the animals they are attempting to tame.

Some of the unforgettable players are; George, the old “never say die” cowpoke who captures our heart immediately. The Navajo grandfather, Charles, whose patience and hesitation become heart wrenching and the wildcat, Wylene Wilson from Queen Creek, Arizona. This single mother/horse trainer/local, state and national competitor can have an entertaining bio on just herself alone.

We also come to discover that the horses themselves are individuals that have different moods and temperaments. They can be funny, sad, stubborn and proud. Dawson and Gricus have provided so many enriching moments that one wishes the film was even longer.

I think the greatest strength of this film is that it appeals to all ages. My 11 year-old came in 10 minutes after it started and was transfixed from then on. He’s even asked me to buy it when it gets released on DVD. That is the first documentary he’s ever wanted. “Wild Horse, Wild Ride,” is a endearingly drawn testament to the men and women who have involved themselves in an arduous task that becomes a thing of beauty and the magnificence of the wild Mustang.

sarah-poster“The Dead Inside,” is a curiosity that will probably be cherished by the legion of fans that have given their undying love to films like “REPO: The Genetic Opera”. I sat amused, perplexed and sometimes unsettled while watching this bizarre little film that resembles its lead character with DID (Dissociative Identity Disorder), if that is what she is suffering from. I was never quite sure. Travis Betz’s tour-de-force into the strange is an off-beat and original zombie story told by a writer with issues of terrible writer’s block that may be threatened with an exorcism and involved with a very sick ghost with all encompassing musical numbers. It’s a mixed bag that works at times (for me) and no matter what will keep you watching till the very end.

The zombie story, the most interesting, is being written by the lead character. We get glimpses of what is going on in the writer’s mind, it’s weird and fun. But when we suffer through her writer’s block it feels a little self indulgent on the part of Betz the writer, but that is only temporary when we find that our heroine may need an exorcism! The story feels like it’s going in several different directions, but by the end appears to come together and we discover that Betz really does know where he is going with it.

I mentioned earlier that there were two look-a-likes and “The Dead Inside” provides us with Sarah Lassez as Fi a dead ringer for Lea Michele (Glee). Although, Lassez is a bit more fun to watch and unpredictable with her various mood swings, nothing like the annoying whiner Michele plays on Glee. Lassez may not have the vocal range, but she and her co-star Dustin Fasching as Wes are just as entertaining as anyone in “REPO”.

Art direction has to be mentioned here. The color scheme and the cinematography are so uncomfortably intentional that I have to applaud the talents behind them. It brings to mind George A. Romero’s “Dawn of the Dead”.

I keep mentioning “REPO: the Genetic Opera,” because I was never a fan of it. Yet the film has die-hard fans that swear to it as both a great piece of entertainment and a very cool art form. I believe “The Dead Inside” has that same quality that somehow escapes me, but I recognize its legitimacy. Betz’s film always remains interesting and his actors go the extra mile to have us root for them. Its originality is what shines and had it win the Dan Harkins Breakthrough Filmmaker Award.

Kudos goes out to all three films and their display of their independence. All three films are currently playing the festival circuit. They clearly break away from the cookie-cutter mold that the industry shoves in front of us far too often. I urge you to check them out whenever possible, because life is too short not to be entertained.

Thespians; an Intellectual and Emotional Peak By Ray Schillaci

Warning: this may be a biased review. There I’ve warned you. Now a little background; I was awarded Best Thespian in high school. My mom was a working actress for years and my oldest son has just been awarded the title of Honor Thespian at his high school, although he has no intentions of continuing down that path. For those uninitiated; the mission of the International Thespian Society is to honor student excellence in the theatre arts. Their motto is, “Act well thy part; there all the honor lies.” As a kid and as an adult I have taken ITS very seriously. So, when “Thespians” won Best Documentary at the Phoenix Film Festival I could not help but be skeptical.

thespians_poster_600pxI had reservations about seeing this documentary on four thespian troupes that were followed to the largest high school theatre competition in the world. Was it possible to rekindle what I had experienced as a Thespian in high school? Could it honestly capture the real feelings of the other young men and women of today’s high school Thespian troupes? How could it get to the core of why a child chooses to take on such an emotional rollercoaster?

I am happy to say that “Thespians” does it all and more. The journey for these young men and women is both heartbreaking and uplifting. Needless to say, this is not a film for action buffs, jocks or weekend warriors. “Thespians” is a sensitive documentary that explores the inner workings of the child that is growing up, discovering who they are and celebrating their individualism. It also introduces the guiding lights that help these young people on their creative road of life; the dedicated teachers, professors and directors who embody the love of theatre arts.

Director Warren Skeels dedicates his lens on several individuals and captures the same magic that the teachers see in their students. Whether it is a monologue, a small group musical or a one-act play, Skeels carefully takes us through the range of emotions that encapsulates everything it is to be part of this unique society. It proves to be far more work than most can imagine.

We are shown how one connects with the emotional core of the playwright’s character. We see the teachers encouraging the students to study all the nuances that can include history, familiarity of set design, dialogue, inflictions, control of body language, voice and more. It is a far more rigorous schedule than anybody ever gives these kids credit for.

There are so many important issues touched upon in this wonderful documentary. The doubts that always hang over so many and the milestone accomplishment in conquering what weakens one’s confidence level. The secret lives some lead to mask their real pain and how they learn to slowly peel away the body armor. Challenging each other and going beyond the expectations even though the outcomes may not always be rewarding.

Skeels works a high wire act between the fun and camaraderie and the seriousness of competition. This is accompanied by the fact that if anyone of them decides to choose acting as a career, then their life will be one long competition. With competition comes discipline and Skeels shows the labor that goes into such a life. He also reveals no matter how talented one may be, the rules will not be broken and sometimes breaking them is paid with a heavy price.

I will end this review on a personal note. It is very hard to get my whole family together and watch a movie. Usually someone has other things better to do; be on the computer, texting or playing video games. It’s even harder if I suggest that I have a documentary. The closest thing to watching a documentary in my home is watching the Kardashians have their way with everybody else’s life or seeing a Playboy playmate mope about her blessed existence while using 2% of her brain power.

“Thespians” riveted my entire family while making them laugh, cry and develop a wonderfully deep meaningful conversation afterwards. I encourage families, schools, religious groups and anybody that has any love for the arts to rally for this movie and encourage a wide distribution release. Our children and our souls deserve it.

April 26, 2011

Trailer Park: LEGEND OF THE FIST: THE RETURN OF CHEN ZHEN

Filed under: Reviews,Trailer Park — Tags: , , — admin @ 1:30 am

By Christopher Stipp

The Archives, Right Here

Check out my other column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

REVIEW – LEGEND OF THE FIST: THE RETURN OF CHEN ZHEN

legend-of-the-fist-movie-posterThis is has been a good year for Donnie Yen. With IP MAN 2 establishing Donnie as the heir apparent to an absent Jet Li and a broken down, family movie making, Jackie Chan there is a sense of wonder at a man who can flow through a fight with grace and fury but who has not set his sights on a wider market. Be it an indifference to the wants and needs of a global film treasure trove that could await him should he just get his foot in the door stateside or just plain satisfaction in doing the kinds of films he’s happy enough doing overseas, the man is electrifying in this role.

Set in Shanghai around the end of World War I, Donnie plays Chen Zhen, a club owner in just the kind of place that Spielberg envisioned as a swanky Asian nightclub in TEMPLE OF DOOM. The story revolves around Japan’s encroachment into China and thus we have our tension. Throw in a Japanese spy who Yen falls for and we have ourselves a film. And it’s a film that caters to almost every fan of martial arts. The opening sequence alone is enough to make you wonder at the ways that choreographers continue to find nuances in making you believe there is still some originality to be found in this genre. With only his wits and fists, Yen explodes with this ability to be nimble and entirely compelling. The only issue, though, is that it’s like the opening sequence to a great comic book. You get sucked in by the cover only to wait 14 pages to get to the core of what you thought you were getting.

Not that what you get is tiresome by any means. The story set in Shanghai is filled with narrative and endless conversations, to say nothing of the occasional foot to someone’s face. There is a lot of exploring going on as it relates to character and while I didn’t mind as a viewer I could understandably see that what’s being marketed is an action movie of slick proportions. What’s served, however, is a little less Michael Bay and a little more introspection. People are talking a lot and, as a costumed superhero of sorts, Yen acquits himself quite well as he vacillates between hardcore street fighter and suave, debonair smooth talker.

Directed by Wai-keung Lau, the man who brought the world INFERNAL AFFAIRS, the film is relentless when it has to be and that’s what saves this from being a disappointing, confusing hodgepodge of tone and theme. Lau stitches the needs of the story with the mindless violence that most of us are here for in a way that is just as seamless as Yen’s fighting. As well, buttressed by a wicked opening sequence and a finale that finally feels like someone thought of something truly brilliant instead of something that’s just flashy, the movie keeps itself afloat by being engaging at all the right times.

What separates this film from so many others in past years is that this movie feels like it wasn’t just saddled with a few kung-fu  set pieces and sent on its way. It’s a movie that wants to try and be light and breezy like an action movie with just a little narrative in there for good measure. These characters are legendary in the genre and both Yen and Lau do them a great service by being faithful to the spirit of the story and for making a movie that is more than worth your time to check out. It’s certainly a movie worthy enough to be considered one of Yen’s best films in the last five years and there is no substitution for the joy you get at the opening and closing sequences. Highly recommended.

December 28, 2010

Best Blu-Rays of 2010

soapbox-header.png

Best Blu-Rays of 2010

lucyline.gif

After acquiring my Playstation 3 last summer, I’ve gone mad with Blu-Ray fever, and I spent most of 2010 attempting to make my Blu-Ray collection resemble the massive and unnecessary scale of my DVD stash. Though I do not have a multi-region player and thus this list will include only Regions A and 0 discs, I stand by my year-end picks of the most essential discs for a cinephile’s collection. Not all will give your home theater a workout, but most will, and they all demonstrate the capacity of the medium to not only give the best possible image but to retain film-like quality like never before. So, without further ado, here are the Blu-Rays, and a handful of DVDs, you need to own.

Best Blu-Rays of 2010

1. By Brakhage, Vols. I & II (Criterion)

by-brakhageA collection of a master’s work that displays its greatness as much by the caliber of material left off the set as the genius of the included short films, By Brakhage is a necessary and infinitely rewarding trove of experimental cinema. Criterion have always erred on the side of preservation of a film’s look over completely smoothing grain, but they’ve managed to upgrade the technical specs of Stan Brakhage’s work while doing nothing to compromise the original image. Grain is omnipresent, because Brakhage incorporated it into his visual freak-outs (some of the shorts left off the set were omitted because Brakhage designed them with the flicker of a proper film projector in mind). Complete with footage of Brakhage’s lectures and interviews and a massive booklet, By Brakhage is a masterpiece right down to the cover art.

2. City Girl/Sunrise (Masters of Cinema)

sunrise_moc_blu-ray_72dpi_2dcity_girl_mocIt’s understandable that the otherwise laudable Kino and Criterion would insist on region-coding now that UK’s Eureka! label have gotten in on the Blu-Ray game: their pledge to release region-free BDs could cause trouble when Americans get a full view of the quality of their products. To date, their finest offerings are two restorations of F.W. Murnau classics. City Girl may not be on the same level as Sunrise (one of the 10 best films ever made), but the restoration Eureka! did for it manages to outstrip even that of Sunrise. A film made In 1931 has no business looking this pristine, and the near-total lack of the heavy damage expected in films this old distracted me from how great the film itself is, and how much it influenced masters like Terrence Malick. As for Murnau’s masterpiece, it shows its age more but still looks fantastic, and the alternate version unearthed looks even nicer. It also comes with a documentary on 4 Devils, Muranu’s legendary lost film, making these two must-owns for any cinephile.

3. The Night of the Hunter (Criterion)

night_of_the_hunter_blu-rayCriterion’s work on Charles Laughton’s fairy tale/horror The Night of the Hunter leaps over the high bar the distributor has already set for itself, turns around, raise the bar higher, then jumps over it again. Certain flaws inherent in the print remain, but the grain is pleasantly balanced when it appears, and the film never suffers for its shifts between cleaner studio shots and hazier location shoots. As impressive is the home video debut of the 2002 documentary comprising a trove of outtake footage Laughton’s widow released after his death. The two-and-a-half-hour behind-the-scenes doc shows just how meticulously and forcefully the director planned each moment, even berating the child actors to make them convincing in their scenes of terror and despair (or maybe he just hated them; Robert Mitchum himself attested to the latter). The Night of the Hunter is one of the most lyrical, multifaceted movies ever made, and Criterion gave it the treatment it well deserved.

4. Apocalypse Now: Full Disclosure Edition (Lionsgate)

apocalypse-now-full-disclosure-blu-ray-380pxPresented in its definitive packaging, the Full Disclosure Edition of Apocalypse Now contains so many extras that it’s almost easy to ignore the film itself. Then you watch it (and, just as importantly, listen to it), and the stuffed-to-the-gills set takes a back seat to the enduring audiovisual might of Coppola’s schizoid triumph. A sterling video transfer and flawless update of the pioneering surround sound track make Apocalypse Now not only a film that should be a go-to on its cinematic quality but as a means of showing off a home theater. They don’t make ’em like this anymore, and that’s probably a good thing for the mental and physical health of every director working today.

5. Beauty and the Beast (Disney)

beauty_and_the_beast_bluDisney’s work with their films has been nothing less than exemplary, and I nearly flipped a coin to decide between this and their restoration of Walt Disney’s still-ahead-of-its-time, genre-annihilating Fantasia. But the Beast won out, not only for the slight edge it offers it audiovisual upgrade but for the host of extras it offers. Commentary tracks, a making-of twice as long as the actual film, remastered deleted scenes, a host of ported DVD extras and more add to the immaculate restoration of one of Disney’s finest films, making the complexities of the love story between Belle and a transformed prince all the more engaging. The best Disney movies have the ability to take your breath away, and however much of an imperial sub-power they’ve become, someone over there still recognizes that and has put all effort into ensuring the presentations of those films leave us breathless, too.

6. The Thin Red Line (Criterion)

the_thin_red_lineFar and away the best audiovisual presentation of the year, and certainly a contender for one of the most impressive in home video history, Criterion’s Blu-Ray of The Thin Red Line took one of the most beautiful films ever made and somehow makes it look even better. Fans sent rumors into a whirlwind over the possibility of the original, five-hour workprint version being included, but the scant outtakes that are included are a joy, containing elongated shots of Terrence Malick’s sensual transcendentalism and even the faces of cut actors like Mickey Rourke. Yet the caliber of the extras only seems the cherry on top as I continue to marvel over the sheer perfection of the film’s high-definition mastering. The Thin Red Line is one of the great war films, one that manages to avoid glorifying war while still being enthralling, and the Blu-Ray perfectly captures its power.

7. The Double Life of Veronique (Artificial Eye)

veronique_uk_bdWith Criterion’s own update on the way in February, I shall be interested to see if they can produce a finer transfer than the sterling one offered by Artificial Eye’s region-free disc. Containing most of the extras included in Criterion’s DVD release – the highlight of which are short films by Kieslowski – the Artificial Eye Blu-Ray proves its own mettle with a stunning transfer that restores, then bolsters, the original cinematography to its transfixing, green-yellow glory. Kieslowski was a sensualist poet, treading in metaphysics but only ever putting emotion on the screen in a way that only the finest modern directors – Malick, Kar-wai, Kiarostami – can manage. The Double Life of Veronique is possibly the best starting point for Kieslowski’s

8. Minority Report (Paramount)

minority-report-blu-raySteven Spielberg was an early supporter of Blu-Ray and refused to let his films appear on what he felt was the inferior HD-DVD, but since Paramount initially had HD-DVD exclusivity, we had to make do with the (excellent) Close Encounters of the Third Kind set until Spielberg could get to work on remastering his modern films for Blu-Ray release. The wait was worth it. All of Spielberg’s Dreamworks releases this year — Minority Report, War of the Worlds and Saving Private RyanMinority Report benefits the most from the upgrade (besides, it’s my favorite of the three listed). The sterile, hyper-white tones of deceptively utopian society are blinding, while the more chaotic look of the film’s dynamic scenes is immaculately preserved while still looking gritty. Spielberg avoids commentary tracks (a crying shame, since he’d probably be brilliant at them), but there are enough behind-the-scenes mini-documentaries to satisfy all your pressing questions. The bounty of extras pushes a superb offering over the top, and one of Spielberg’s finest films has never looked better.

9. The Twilight Zone: Season 1 (Image Entertainment)

twilight-zone-bd-cover_300Rod Serling was a few decades ahead of his time when he took the budding television medium to an early zenith with The Twilight Zone. Dismissed in its own time by those who could not process the numerous commentaries on ’50s social and political life — a particularly risible interview at the time had Mike Wallace asking Serling, “For the time being and for the foreseeable future, you’ve given up on writing anything important for television, right?” — The Twilight Zone is today rightly heralded as a masterpiece of programming. Image Entertainment has set out to honor the show’s legacy, and they’ve succeeded beyond doubt with this set. The remastered A/V quality astounds for a 50-year-old series recorded on old T.V stock, but the extras, oh Lord, the extras. The only reason this is just in ninth place is because I haven’t yet had the time to go through them all. Commentaries of 19 of the season’s 36 episodes, the unaired pilot, the unaired unofficial pilot, interviews, radio dramas inspired by the series, lectures by Serling at Sherwood Oaks College. It is an absurdly bountiful package, and I assume the same is true of the recently released second season, which I have not yet bought. The show is a seminal piece of pop culture history, it now looks as if it had just been made, and the extras are voluminous and (at least of the ones I’ve gone through so far) highly rewarding. What more must you know?

10. The White Ribbon (Sony)

whiteribbonA personal choice, perhaps, but I continue to be struck by the perfection of Sony’s transfer of The White Ribbon, one of the most gorgeous films in years. Unlike the other choices on this list, all of which came out before I was born or when I was too young to go see them in a theater or at least retain the experience, I had the luxury of catching The White Ribbon in theaters. Take it from me: the Blu-Ray puts the film on the small-screen without error, completely capturing the texture of its old-school film. Extras may be on the slim side, but this is a film that should seep into your mind without the director standing five feet away informing you of the themes as soon as you finish. For all its beauty, this is not an easy film to watch, but Sony have made things as gentle on your eyes as possible, so give this haunting allegory for the rise of Nazism if you have the fortitude to stand it.

Best DVD-only releases:

Rossellini War Trilogy (Criterion)

rossellinis-trilogyRoberto Rossellini’s War Trilogy truly changed the face of film forever, exploding Italy’s nascent neorealist scene into international acclaim. Viewed today, the film that started it all (Rome, Open City) looks remarkably melodramatic, but its spiritual sequels — Paisan and Germany Year Zero are uncompromising and scathingly political in a country that would probably best be served by just keeping quiet and saying only “Thank you, sir, may I have another?” to anyone that paid them attention. Criterion gives these films strong transfers despite the limitations of the grainy, cheap stock used to record them, elegantly preserving some of the most important movies of all time.

The Larry Sanders Show: The Complete Series (Shout! Factory)

the-larry-sanders-show-the-complete-seriesWhile Seinfeld may deservedly command reverence among comedy acolytes for its depiction of “a show about nothing,” for my money it will always live in the shadow of Garry Shandling, whose metacomedic It’s Garry Shandling’s Show subverted conventions far more than a lackadaisically plotted tour of Manhattan. But Shandling’s greatest achievement was a six-season sitcom on HBO that received copious praise but little in the way of commercial attention. Based on the fallout from the Tonight Show handover — with which Shandling, considered to take Letterman’s vacant spot at Late Night when Dave jumped to CBS — The Larry Sanders Show peeled back the veneer of late night, exposing the greasy sheen and phony interest that Johnny Carson could make genuine and inviting but everyone else could not contain. I had previously been acquainted with the show by its first season the only one released by Sony all the way back in 2002, and I was struck immediately by its pitch-black tone of voice, a relentless discomfort that would go on to influence most of the best comedy of the new millennium (Ricky Gervais and Stephen Merchant cited it as a major influence for The Office). Having just gotten it for Christmas, I’ve only just started to work through the other seasons, but taking that and the abysmal video quality of the low-budget show into account, I feel no qualms calling this essential. I’ve heard that the show maintained its quality throughout, but even a dip couldn’t kill the power of its early seasons. A buried classic is finally unearthed.

Best Music DVD:

The Promise: The Darkness on the Edge of Town Story

darkness_boxBruce Springsteen intended to give 30th anniversary reissues to his classic albums – which is a redundancy on my part, as they’re all classics – but he never made it to the second reissue without problems. Two years late, the anniversary edition of Darkness on the Edge of Town makes up for the setback by blowing the impressive Born to Run package out of the water. The box set offers a remastered album and a two-CD set of songs that were left off the meticulously planned final cut of Darkness — and these 21 songs are but a fraction of the nearly 70 Springsteen wrote during the legal duress that kept him from recording after Born to Run, some of which would make his release The River while others remain in the vaults or nothing more than notebook scribblings. But the three DVDs are the chief draw. One features a making-of documentary for the album with background info on the legal troubles and a self-critical eye toward the writing and recording of ten perfectly chosen songs. The second disc features the album played in its entirety last year, while the third unloads a previously unseen film of one of the Boss’ legendary Darkness tour shows in Houston. While I wish he’d remastered the Dec. 20 show in Seattle, a bootleg I hold so dear I would actually trade the memory of concerts I’ve attended just for high-quality audio of this performance, I think it’s admirable Springsteen would acknowledge the efforts of bootleggers to put out material from that tour and give them something new. Bruce Springsteen is simply the most dynamic white man to perform rock ‘n roll, and he never topped the energy and force of his ’78 tour. To have an official release finally documented it is a joy, and the other five discs included – to say nothing of the impressive packaging – are delightful extras compared to it.

– Jake Cole is a journalism student at Auburn University, where he regularly avoids people in favor of writing about film, television and music on his blog, Not Just Movies. Where he gets the nerve (or the money) to get and review all these Blu-Rays is anyone’s guess. After all, he’s too fat to be a thief. The mystery continues.

November 15, 2010

Review: SCOTT PILGRIM VS. THE WORLD

Filed under: DVD News,Reviews — Tags: , , , — Aaron @ 1:56 pm

soapbox-header.png

Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World

lucyline.gif

The biggest and most pleasurable surprise I have had at the multiplex this year is the astonishing crop of unique, stylistic and transgressive romantic comedies to hit theaters. Iranian filmmaker Abbas Kiarostami’s France-set Certified Copy used his typically metafictional approach to undermine the entire genre even as he tapped into the core of pain and anxiety that propels the conflicts not only of romantic comedy but romance itself. 87-year-old legend Alain Resnais used his own fourth-wall breaking effervescence to bypass the emotion to get to the sexual lust of love in Wild Grass.

scott-pilgrim-vs-the-world-dvd-blu-ray-box-artI knew Edgar Wright’s Scott Pilgrim vs. the World would be no less aesthetically daring when the opening credits warped the dimensions of the apartment where the titular protagonist and his band practice, suddenly playing hyperkinetic colors cascading over the screen, matching the sort of industrial indie grind belted out by the band, Sex Bob-omb. In a flash, Wright uses some of the first moments of the film to recall the great experimental filmmaker Stan Brakhage, a man who took film form to new heights when he ceased filming and simply painted and scratched on film stock. What I noticed upon re-watching Scott Pilgrim was how much the seemingly random swirl of neon actually reveals about the characters, from the faint etching of “One! Two! Three! Four!” on Allison Pill’s credit or the straight edge exes for Brandon Routh’s.

What I did notice the first time I watched the film but saw even more clearly now was how much Scott Pilgrim vs. the World is a logical progression from Wright’s breakthrough, the Britcom Spaced. Spaced, a British — read: funny – update on Friends with a dash of Three’s Company, used the conceit of two friends posing as a married couple to live in a nice, affordable flat to explore feelings of Gen-X ennui and idle. Simon Pegg and Jessica Stevenson (now Hynes) wrote characters who dreamed of being artists, only to toil away in minimum wage jobs and watch the same geeky movies and shows over and over without purpose.

Wright and co. turned the sitcom into a surreal masterpiece, using one episode to launch a zombie invasion, another to pit characters in Robot Wars-like combat, and so, so much more. Through it all, the crew never lost track of why they put so much focus into seemingly gimmicky, absurd episodes: in doing so, they captured the mentality of Generation X, social alienation that offered no cultural touchstone upon which to build an identity. So, they built it on the artifice of pop culture. For the first time, movies defined a generation, and the ones that did were typically filled with allusions to previous generation’s cinema. As funny as Spaced was, the central dramatic arc of the series concerned the characters bumping up against the limitations of that worldview, as critical of getting trapped in adolescent geek worship as it was gleefully accepting.

Scott Pilgrim vs. the World jumps Spaced forward a generation, shifting the cultural bedrock from slacker cinema to the millennial age. The film’s frenzied, luminescent aesthetic befits a generation raised on the Internet, diagnosed with ADHD in disturbing numbers. Match cuts jump characters through time and space as Scott’s scatterbrain wonders off in conversation, only to pick up consciousness hours later; it’s a testament to how pointless everyone’s conversations are that each line can run into a later chat without any discrepancy.

scott-pilgrim_sword

Casting Michael Cera was a masterstroke on Wright’s part, and he did it for the exact right reason. He said he wanted someone who “audiences will still follow even when the character is being a bit of an ass,” and Cera has that quality in spades. But Scott is such a self-absorbed character that, paradoxically, his myopia breaks Cera of the increasingly narrow range in which he works. Cera manages to play his usual, endearing geek, only to then pit that type against itself. Wright has an underappreciated ability to draw out the stunted emotions of his male characters and the subtler maturity of his equally regressed females. The latter is particularly important because so many filmmakers take the easy way out and make their women not only the moral core of the work but the mental one. There’s an admirable lack of Madonna/whore complexes in Wright’s work, and every time he brushes up against that dead horse, he veers off magnificently as if a showboating pilot buzzing a tower.

Wright, working with Bryan Lee O’Malley’s comic series, positions Scott as one of those awkward nice guys who doesn’t notice just how hurtful he can be. His geekiness makes him lazy and focused only on avenues of entertainment — his hilariously bad band, video game arcades — incapable of noticing how many girls he’s casually dumped as he continues to wallow in misery over the one time someone screwed him over. He dates Knives Chau (Ellen Wong), a 17-year-old Catholic schoolgirl with strict Chinese parents whose repressed naïveté makes her view Scott as some kind of catch, validating Scott after the one time he got burned in a relationship.

When he turns his attention to Ramona Flowers (Mary Elizabeth Winstead), literally the girl of his dreams, we find that she’s not that much better. She’s had her own experiences with breaking hearts, and in her more revealing moments, she seems just as lost and confused by her place in the world as Scott, even if she is maturing faster than him. She’s just moved from New York to Toronto to get away from her life, but neither her change of location nor her constant skating through subspace can give off the impression that she’s going anywhere in life.

“Everybody has baggage,” she tells Scott, but hers comes in the form of seven evil exes who challenge Scott to duels to the death. Each battle has its own fighting style, from a warped Bollywood dance to a showdown between bassists to a battle of the bands fought through amps. Wright ingeniously changes up color palettes to ensure that not only the fighting differentiates from other battles, but the look of the film itself shifts too.

scott-pilgrim-exes1

Underneath the brilliance of these fights, however, is a nagging question: why are these jilted lovers fighting Scott? None of them seem that hung up on Ramona, and even the ringleader, Gideon (Jason Schwartzman) never cared about her when they were together. O’Malley and Wright make the exes more a projection of Ramona’s guilt and aimlessness than people in their own right. Rather than portray her as just a femme fatale who dates someone just long enough to break his (or her) heart. By unloading her hang-ups onto Scott, she brings him into her world, the dark, nebulous transition from Scott’s obliviousness and adulthood. When Knives, who blames Ramona for Scott dumping her instead of the boy, starts to stalk and attack Ramona, we see how Scott has his own baggage that he can’t own up to. Like Spaced‘s Daisy, Ramona may be a bit more mature than the men in her life, but she’s just as mired in listlessness and feelings of inadequacy.

But let me back away for a moment to discuss why Scott Pilgrim vs. the World is not just insightful but, quite simply, the most damn fun I had at a theater this year. There isn’t a single scene that tries to be funny and fails. Wright and Michael Bacall’s script fluidly adapts O’Malley’s comics, which struck a balance between early Kevin Smith, Pegg and Stevenson’s writing on Spaced, and even a heaping dose of Tarantino circa Kill Bill. One-liners fly so fast that I’m still finding one I hadn’t yet heard on a third watch: when her ex-girlfriend joins the fray, Ramona excuses that aspect of her past by saying it was just a phase. “You had a sexy phase?!” asks Scott incredulously. Nearly everything Scott’s gay roommate, Wallace (Kieran Culkin), says will make you double over in laughter.

Then there’s the matter of Wright’s visuals. There haven’t been as many sight gags in American comedic cinema in, oh dear, decades? His penchant for reference humor finds its most frenetic outlet, quoting liberally from classic video games, action movies, Natural Born Killers (the use of a laugh track in one sequence, which also plays the Seinfeld bassline) and the split-cell design of comic books. Gideon is openly modeled after the vile, demonic producer Swan from Brian De Palma’s woefully under-seen music industry musical Phantom of the Paradise.

scott-pilgrim-movie

De Palma could be seen as the overriding influence on Wright’s film, and Scott Pilgrim at times resembles what the elder director might make if he could get his hands on a sizeable budget again. Wright puts digital animation over the movie, scribbling onomatopoeic words like “Ding-dong” for doorbells or adding action lines and lighting bolts to communicate the “epic epicness” of the film’s tagline. The use of split-screen makes the film more like a comic book, but it also carries De Palma’s stamp through and through, as do some of the more complicated camera movements and the odd use of iris. Wright has his team throw in objects such as a “pee bar” that hovers over Scott and drains as he empties his bladder, depict the battle of the bands between Sex Bob-omb and the Katayanagi twins as a duel between beasts summoned from the power of rock (and house) music. It bewilders me even now to think that the film cost less than $100 million when it contains more ingenuity and more dazzling effects than Michael Bay’s Transformer movies.

Like De Palma, Wright never lets the joke get in the way of a deeper sincerity, but where De Palma’s vision is fundamentally cynical, Wright’s is more optimistic. It shows in the greater rapport he has with actors, whom he trusts, and the giddy playfulness he brings to his work. I wasn’t entirely satisfied with the ending the first time I saw Scott Pilgrim vs. the World, feeling that it arrived too quickly off of a climactic fight that didn’t calm things down enough. Now, however, I find it as clever as anything else in the movie. As with Spaced, Scott Pilgrim ends an resolved note, but an ambiguous one. The characters have only finally made it to a breakthrough, but we won’t get to see them at last move into the next phase of life. It’s perhaps the most touching moment in Wright’s canon so far, proof that after he’d made bromance so affecting with his last two features, he could finally do love with adroit skill. It’s easy to get caught up in how fun Edgar Wright’s movies are, because they have all held up to all the repeat viewings I can give them. But it took me a while to see just how much empathy he has for his characters, and how fluidly he can make the personal work of another artist (O’Malley) his own. Armed with a perfectly chosen cast, a deft script and a touch of brazen visual surrealism that surely damned the film by making it ahead of its time, Wright has shattered the boundaries between film, video game, comic book and cartoon. What’s more impressive is how effortlessly he does it.

Blu-Ray Specs

Universal’s AVC-encoded 1080p transfer looks magnificent. Scott Pilgrim vs. the World is a mixture of dazzling effects and lo-fi, indie-music-as-visual-aesthetic cinematography, thus creating a possible quality leap between the brilliant, popping colors of the animated effects and the drab look of snowy Toronto. Fear not, this transfer handles the juxtaposition almost flawlessly, presenting a healthy, natural amount of grain and an eye-popping presentation of the more striking visual aspects of the film. Black levels are incredible too, and the shot of Scott silhouetted in total darkness as he wears a blue parka looks perfectly crisp, not washing out the blue in the black at all.

As for the audio, well, I had to keep turning the volume down because the DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1 mix is so overwhelming I was afraid neighbors would come knocking even in the middle of the afternoon. The combination of the film’s garage/indie soundtrack, overwhelming Foley effects in fights and subtler use of sound gave Scott Pilgrim one of the better mixes of any film this year, and it’s all been ported over to the home theater. There are as many gags on the soundtrack as there are in the visuals, so the audio quality is especially welcome in unpacking the film’s numerous treats.

Special Features

Edgar Wright has never been one to let his work hit home video without copious extras, but he outdoes himself here. First up, he offers a whopping four commentaries: 1) Wright, co-writer Michael Bacall and Byan Lee O’Malley; 2) a technical track with Wright and cinematographer Bill Pope; 3) cast commentary with Cera, Winstead, Wong, Schwartzman and Brandon Routh; 4) a second cast commentary with Anna Kendrick, Aubrey Plaza, Kieran Culkin, and Mark Webber. I have not had the chance to listen to all of them yet, but the first cast commentary is light while insightful and the snippet I listened to of the second promises some goods as the supporting players are all hungover from the premiere they attended the night before.

Elsewhere, we get:

  • Deleted scenes: 21 deleted and extended scenes, almost all of which would have been a welcome addition to the film. Wright also throws in the original ending which seemed the more logical and appropriate choice when I first watched the movie but now that I actually see what was proposed, I agree with the choice ultimately made.
  • Alternate Footage.
  • Blooper Reel.
  • Documentaries: four docs on various aspects of the film, the highlight of which is a 50-minute broad overview of the movie’s production.
  • Pre-Production: An 85-minute look into the long and studious pre-production process on the film, from casting to rehearsal to set design.
  • Visual Effects: A more in-depth look at some of the more impressive animation sequences in the film.
  • Soundworks Collection: A sadly brief examination of the masterful sound editing on the feature.
  • Music Promos: Includes music videos, remixes and montages set to the film’s music.
  • Adult Swim: Scott Pilgrim vs. The Animation: An animated short made for Cartoon Newtork.
  • Blogs: Wright’s production diary
  • Galleries: Production stills and press kit material.
  • Trivia Track: A pop-up feature with tidbits. Somewhat unnecessary given the presence of four commentary tracks.
  • U-Control: Offers Picture-in-Picture storyboards.
  • Scott Pilgrim vs. the Censors: Re-loops the dialogue to avoid swears.
  • Theatrical trailers and TV spots.

And if that’s not enough, the disc is also BD-Live enabled.

Final Thoughts

Scott Pilgrim vs. the World is Edgar Wright’s third straight masterwork in a row (fourth if you count Spaced). With a fraction of the usual summer blockbuster budget, Wright has delivered the most inventive mainstream film in years, but also one that develops the same themes that have occupied him his whole career. It changed my opinion of Cera, deepened my appreciation for Winstead (who is one of the best young actresses working) and Culkin, and gave us a fantastic newcomer in Wong. Some say Scott Pilgrim is destined to become a midnight movie, which I’m sure would send Wright over the moon. I think that’s probably true, but I also believe that the film is cleverer than midnight popcorn fare. As much as I still love to cheer on its lunacy, I find myself increasingly affected by its ideas and more and more able to see myself, and my friends, in the characters. Wright was already ahead of the curve in terms of making riotous, reference-heavy genre film with heart, but here he not only transcends genre, he transcends art form. He’s so ahead of everyone now that he’ll have to take the next few years off just to let people catch up. That is, if he wants them to at all.

Jake Cole is a journalism student at Auburn University, where he regularly avoids people in favor of writing about film, television and music on his blog, Not Just Movies. When he is not writing movie reviews, he is inevitably writing something else and will continue to do so until he runs out of excuses not to go outside.

October 21, 2010

Review: APOCALYPSE NOW

Filed under: DVD News,Reviews — Tags: , , , , — Aaron @ 1:54 pm

soapbox-header.png

Apocalypse Now

lucyline.gif

anowbdWhen a worried Francis Ford Coppola walked out of a rapturous reception of Apocalypse Now at the 1979 Cannes Film Festival, his fears turned to confidence, and the press conference he gave summarized both the film’s troubled production and the hallucinatory, exhilarating and terrifying effect of the final product with a single sentence that no critic has ever topped.

“My film isn’t about Vietnam, it is Vietnam.”

Thirty years on, Apocalypse Now continues to stand as the ultimate cinematic statement on the Vietnam War, a position largely unchallenged even in the face of such classics as Platoon and Full Metal Jacket.

Coppola’s line is true, but not in a literal means. Of the various Vietnam films, Apocalypse Now possibly has the least ties to the reality of the war. Christ, it has the least ties to reality, period. But it is Vietnam, capturing the madness, pointlessness, fear and the death of America’s sense of superiority that makes it our most embarrassing period in the public consciousness – more people are willing to talk about it as our most humbling moment and not slavery or the genocide of Native Americans.

Loosely adapted from Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness, Coppola’s magnum opus unfolds in an episodic fashion, each vignette shot with its own color palette and sound design. It’s a subjective overload, from the exhilarating “Ride of the Valkyries” segment shot from the POV of the arrogant, jingoistic Air Cavalry division to the gaudy sleaze that oozes off the screen when a bunch of sex-starved GIs riot in the presence of a tacky, inane show from some Playboy Playmates.

At a certain point, the film travels into the far-out realm of druggy excess, no doubt a byproduct of the splintering sanity on-set but also a naturally unnatural progression from the events of the rest of the film. The humming and churning Moog score contrasts sharply with Coppola’s usual love of opera, and its perfect integration into the mix (courtesy of master editor Walter Murch, who has as much a right to call Apocalypse Now) his film as Coppola) keep the audience on edge, and the increasingly surreal imagery delves further and further into the soul of madness.

What is most interesting about Apocalypse Now is how indirectly it actually deals with Vietnam. It doesn’t even care about the Vietnamese, not in the racist way that The Deer Hunter sets up the Viet Cong as a vague demon that weighs over the psyches of the hearty American men sent to fight them. No, Coppola, surprisingly working with a script the ultra-conservative John Milius (he of Red Dawn fame), paints the war as the result of insane mismanagement by a command structure that kept pressing on for no reason.

Capt. Willard (Martin Sheen) is sent on a top-secret mission not to kill any enemy leader but a renegade American colonel, a decorated vet who went mad in the jungle even as he started fighting the war in a way that got results standard operating procedures could not create. There is an air of jealousy in the chain of command that sends Willard on his mission, correctly calling Kurtz insane but doing so more because he flaunts their authority.

Elsewhere, visions of America’s aimlessness rise to the surface. The Air Cav colonel, Kilgore (Robert Duvall), orders an attack on a Vietcong stronghold simply because the areas has good waves and he loves to surf. In the film’s most hallucinatory segment, Willard and the boat crew that ferries him come across a bridge that the VC blow up each night and the Americans rebuild in the morning just so they can defend it again. With all commanding officers in the area dead, the line deteriorates, and one sees how Kurtz’s brutal methods could attract those who see the old system failing in front of them.

Coppola ignited a minor controversy at the film’s Cannes premiere when he said he wasn’t sure about the ending. Though he never referred to anything more than a few minor alterations he considered in the editing bay, it must be said that the one aspect of Apocalypse Now that lacks is the final moments. Yet the ambiguity, even the defeatism of Willard’s quiet withdrawal from the Kurtz compound also carries a powerful weight to it, the act that proves Willard is no longer tied to either Kurtz’s seductive methods (which would have had him assuming leadership over the native army Kurtz assembled) nor the old power structure (which would have had him bombing the compound into oblivion). As roughly as Coppola arrives at the moment, it serves its purpose: to break us from this nightmare in such a way that we wake up but cannot shake the fear. He denies us a catharsis, even with that brilliantly edited montage of Willard/Kurtz and the sacrificial bull. Were the ending more memorable, it might let us dispense of everything and move on. Instead, Apocalypse Now sits with you for years, the safest kind of shellshock one can suffer.

apocalypse_now_sheen

Blu-Ray

Lions Gate Entertainment has released Apocalypse Now on Blu-Ray in two separate editions: a two-disc set that contains both the 1979 theatrical and 2001 “Redux” version of the film and a slew of extras. The 3-disc “Full Disclosure Edition,” however, is what you want. In addition to the two cuts and the extras, you get an HD version of Hearts of Darkness, the full-length documentary shot by Coppola’s wife Eleanor. What originally started as a means of gathering the usual EPK material blossomed into a horrifying look at the dying moments of New Hollywood as production spiraled out of control, Francis Ford Coppola started to fall apart and Martin Sheen suffered a heart attack. Along with Les Blank’s Burdern of Dreams, a look at Werner Herzog’s equally demanding jungle feature Fitzcarraldo, Hearts of Darkness stands as the definitive making-of documentary, a testament to the film’s insanity and the impressive way Coppola made the production work even when a typhoon obliterated all the sets.

The question typically arises with the film: which cut is better? The “Redux” version, running about 50 minutes longer, contains mostly elongated looks at existing scenes. It draws out a number of fascinating commentaries on the war, extending the end of the “Charlie don’t surf” sequence to show that the napalming of the tree line that Kilgore orders to make it safe to surf ends up sucking up all the wind and calming the water. It’s the best metaphor in the film and it’s a shame Coppola cut it from the original version. Likewise, the notorious French plantation scene, which makes up a bulk of the added footage, gets to the heart of the difference between the colonialist French and the Americans. A handful of French settlers defend a plantation because it is their home, even if they understand they will die there and it will rightfully be retaken by the Vietnamese. But why are the Americans here? “You are fighting for the biggest nothing in history.”

Were the French plantation scene boiled down to that essence, and maybe the provocative but overly joking second interlude with the Playmates, removed, I would call “Redux” the superior version. It’s still one of the greatest alternate cuts ever made, and the additions are direct without being forced (I especially like Kurtz reading a pre-Tet Offensive piece from Time magazine, mocking the media’s inability to expose the pointlessness of the war, allowing themselves to be controlled by the state). Ultimately, though, I prefer the more oneiric, hallucinogenic tone of the theatrical cut, which omits a few of the added sequences I love as much as anything in both cuts but also has a better flow and leaves more to interpretation. Either way, both cuts are masterpieces of the first order and proof that big-budget entertainment can be as beautiful and thought-provoking as underground cinema.

apocalypsenowbrando

Image/Sound Quality

Francis Ford Coppola has overseen all of the Blu-Ray transfers done for his films – though he must have slept through the Dracula remaster – and the results here are as sterling as his magnificent Godfather restoration. Apocalypse Now‘s 1080p image, presented in the proper 2:35:1 aspect ratio (previous editions came in 2.0:1), cannot fully overcome the limitations of late-’70s color film stock (which was of such infamously low quality Martin Scorsese made Raging Bull in black-and-white partly so he knew it would last). But the work done here has turned the softness of the stock into crisp depth and texture. There is an inconsistency to the image because of the various lighting, color and shooting methods employed for each segment of the film, but in some moments you can count the beads of sweat on Martin Sheen’s face. The black levels have never looked better, and the grain is well preserved. I saw a few tiny scratches near the end, but they were harder to spot than the pops in the latest films I see in the theater. This is a remarkable job and one of the most impressive transfers of the year, bar none.

As for the audio, imagine the same level of care done on the video, without the setback of the dated source material. Apocalypse Now‘s DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1 is going in my book as one of the first tracks I will use to test out any new home audio system. Coppola’s film along with Star Wars, pioneered the 5.1 sound mix, and it’s nice that the track that started it all has been treated so lovingly. The subtleties of Walter Murch’s editing are brought out in the very first moments, while Carmine Coppola’s Komita-inspired score is enhanced through the fantastic low-frequency levels. I must admit that audio is the area I am least qualified to speak upon when it comes to these things – which is saying something, because I’m qualified for sweet F-A – but tracks like these, man they do the work for you. The video borders on reference quality in general and certainly stands as one of the best remasters done to date, but the audio is the best I’ve heard all year, even above Criterion’s masterful work with The Thin Red Line‘s soundtrack.

a_now-bridge

Extras

Oh dear God, where to start. I am confident now in saying that the only Blu-Ray release this year that will best the treasure trove offered here will be the Alien anthology due at the end of the month. It’s not often you get truth in advertising, but when they said “Full Disclosure Edition,” they damn sure meant it.

Disc One

Audio commentary for both cuts: Francis Ford Coppola offers some of the best commentary you’ll ever hear, and the rich production history and thematic interpretations of Apocalypse Now afford him more topics of conversation than any of his other works. He offers technical info, anecdotes, unlikely inspirations and all kinds of tidbits that make his discussion as interesting at times as the film itself. The two tracks are clearly taken from the same recording, with the “Redux”-specific comments inserted in with the same seamless branching that the film uses.

Disc Two

As far as I can tell, all of the extras placed in the previous “Complete Dossier” DVD have been ported over. These include:

  • Additional scenes
  • “Monkey Sampan” deleted scene: Separate from the additional scenes, this rough cut of a disturbing scene was correctly described as the film in a few minutes. The PBR rides by an abandoned Vietnamese fishing boat overrun with monkeys, only for the wind to shift the sail and reveal a man flayed to death. The boat is floating downstream from where Willard and the crew are heading. It’s redundant, but I wish it had made the final cut.
  • The Hollow Men: A clip of Marlon Brando reciting T.S. Eliot’s poem with scenes from the film and production interspersed into the video.
  • The Birth of 5.1 Sound: A short piece that traces the prototypical stereo design on Star Wars to the breakthrough of Apocaylpse Now
  • Ghost Helicopter Flyover: A focused look at Walter Murch’s sound design for the perfectly edited sound of choppers in the opening montage of the film
  • The Synthesizer Soundtrack<.i>: A reprint of Bob Moog’s essay from Contemporary Keyboard about the film’s score.
  • A Million Feer of Film: The Editing of ‘Apocalypse Now’: A 17-minute piece on the Herculean task Walter Murch and his team faced having to edit a film that had a shooting schedule that lasted four times longer than it was meant to.
  • Heard Any Good Movies Lately? The Sound Design of ‘Apocalypse Now’: A more in-depth look at the sound design of the movie that deepens the look of the other audio-centric features.
  • The Final Mix: A brief piece on throwing together the sound into the final mix and what was involved in bringing together all the disparate elements.
  • Apocalypse Then and Now: A piece made to go with the release of “Redux” to talk about some of the differences between cuts and reasons for the new edit.
  • PBR Streetgang: Features interviews in 2001 of the actors who played the PBR crew
  • The Color Palette of ‘Apocalypse Now’: A 4-minute look at the three-strip dye transfer techniques used to get the complex color palettes on the film.

That is an impressive list, but wait, there’s new stuff.

  • An Interview with John Milius: A 50-minute feature that has Coppola talking with the film’s writer about Milius’ youthful ambition to adapt Joseph Conrad and his military aspirations.
  • A Conversation with Martin Sheen: A one-hour chat between Coppola and his star. The two meet as old friends who haven’t seen each other in years but still have nothing but affection for each other. They laugh at the horrors of the production like legitimate war veterans who can only look back on what they shared and chuckle.
  • Fred Roos: Casting Apocalypse: The film’s casting director talks about how the actors were chosen. Includes screen test footage of the actors who got the parts, as well as test footage for other auditions (look out for a young Nick Nolte).
  • Mercury Theater Production of ‘Heart of Darkness’: A week after his infamous “War of the Worlds” broadcast, Orson Welles put on a version of Joseph Conrad’s novella. The audio is damaged, but it’s nice that the cinephile Coppola remembered to put in something for Welles, who wanted so desperately to make his own Conrad adaptation for film.
  • 2001 Cannes Film Festival: Francis Ford Coppola: Recorded when Coppola came to Cannes to screen the Redux version out of competition. Contains the entire 40-minute interview with Roger Ebert, who is a fantastic questioner, asking his piece and letting the subject speak without interruption.

Disc Three

Hearts of Darkness arrives in a 1.33:1-framed, 1080p master with DTS-HD Master Audio 2.0. Also included is the commentary by Francis and Eleanor Coppola that offers as much insight as the documentary itself.

Also included are script selections with notes by Francis Ford Coppola, a storyboard gallery, a photo archive and a marketing archive, which included the original trailer, radio spots, the theatrical program handed out in lieu of opening and closing credits, lobby cards and press kit photos. To round it all out, there’s also a poster gallery.

apocalypse-now-choppers

Final Thoughts

Apocalypse Now is one of the few films that links the various kinds of filmgoers, from the casual fan looking for an escape to the deeply committed cinephile, and it has never looked or sounded better. I was disappointed with the so-called “Complete Dossier” DVD for leaving out the greatest extra — Hearts of Darkness — but this Full Disclosure Edition includes not only that but some exciting new extras.

I could name on one hand the number of home releases this year that even approach the level of this Blu-Ray release. I could probably still do so if you cut off two of my fingers. The work Coppola has done with his Blu-Rays is a key demonstration of his love of cinema and his appreciation of tools that make cinephilia easier. With the work he’s done here, he’s surely guaranteed himself yet another generation of devoted fans. If you have to, sell blood to get this Blu-Ray set.

Jake Cole is a journalism student at Auburn University, where he regularly avoids people in favor of writing about film, television and music on his blog, Not Just Movies. When he is not writing movie reviews, he is inevitably writing something else and will continue to do so until he runs out of excuses not to go outside.

October 8, 2010

Trailer Park: THE COW THAT WANTED TO BE A HAMBURGER, THE SOCIAL NETWORK

By Christopher Stipp

The Archives, Right Here

Check out my other column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

The Cow Who Wanted to be a Hamburger – Review

cow-postcardInstead of piling on two reviews for Bill Plympton’s work last week I decided to split this one up, his latest short film, The Cow Who Wanted to be a Hamburger.

Why this short, clocking in at less than six minutes, is notable and deserved a little ink was how much of a departure it might seem to those who have been used to Plympton’s work for the past couple of decades.

While you’re used to images that look sketched out on paper, filled in with colored pencils, and animated in the back and forth motion that is all Bill’s this one is a sight to behold. Using vibrant hues that seem pure as the name Crayola, the greens and the blues and reds just bursting with eye-popping flair, Bill takes a detour from a production like Idiots and Angels insofar that this is a story that is tightly packed in order to hit the post within the few minutes we have with these characters. These characters being cows.

Not in any way your normal cows, this is a Bill Plympton short after all, one of these bovines starts the story by suckling at his mom’s teat and happens to catch a billboard out of the corner of his eye. The billboard is showcasing a luscious hamburger and this calf is inspired. The calf wants to be that hamburger. His mother, wise heifer she is, knows this is absolutely unacceptable but is powerless to try and sway her son to think that wanting to become a burger means certain death.

The short then shows how focused this young cow becomes on being strong, on becoming fattened enough, worthy enough, to be slaughtered.

Without giving anything away about where the path eventually takes this cow the short raises quick, poignant questions about advertising, the ethical questions surrounding slaughter of these animals, and, also, what a mother’s love is capable of in world like this. Yes, there is no real time for long rumination about the implications for these things but that’s the beauty of this short, it sets up a story, raises a question, and gives a resolution. Like a wonderful short story that makes you wonder what would happen if it was turned into a longer version of its former self, this is a perfect example of how Plympton can take something short form or long form and make it just the right length. The man is still at the top of his game and this short was an utter delight.

The Highly UNsocial Network by Ray Schillaci

facebook-film-460_1668713cWith all the praise heaped on Fincher and Sorkin’s “the social network,” coupled with one of the most emotionally charged trailers I have seen in years, the studio appeared to tout the film as an amazing experience.  It suggested a representation of a timely and impactful moment that has made a tremendous change in so many lives.  But that is not what the film is about.  Instead it proves to be as detached (allegedly), as the lead character himself, Mark Zuckerberg co-founder of facebook.  This is not to say that director, David Fincher and writer, Aaron Sorkin’s latest opus is anything less than an exercise in fine filmmaking.  But they have missed a very important mark that the trailers merely touched upon”¦how facebook affected so many (and still does) of us in so little time.  Yes, the trailer did tease us with, “You don’t get to 500 million friends without making a few enemies.”Â  Interesting premise, but is there any cost if we don’t give a shit about that person?

Maybe the powers that be felt the unique and harmonious affect that facebook created was not as intriguing as a socially inept person, craving recognition, inventing the greatest social network in the history of the web just because he felt wrongfully scorned and in turn, learns how to be an ultimate (albeit reluctant) asshole.  Not only does he gain billions of dollars, but much like “Citizen Kane,” has no one to share it with.  He started off as a sad pathetic young man and turned into a sadder more pathetic rich man who’s learned very little about himself and those he affected.

I have no problem with this road taken, except I can’t help feel that the studio sold us a bill of goods with those great trailers.  In no way shape or form do the trailers match the mood or theme of the picture itself.  In fact, this film is very reminiscent in theme and character study to “Citizen Kane” and “There Will Be Blood,” except that this story is belabored with a lead character that has all the emotional interest of white bread.

We open with the scene that everybody seems to be enamored with; the one between, the struggling to be recognized, Zuckerberg and his long suffering girlfriend.  The dialogue is quick, snappy and almost lost.  I’m not sure if it was the theater sound, but the background was nearly as amped up as the dialogue itself.  In a way, it was trying to make out a conversation in one of those bars or coffeehouses where the acoustics are purposely bad for the appearance of making the place a happening spot.  If this was the intention of director, Fincher, then he captured it successfully, but it was also distracting and annoying.  This is the very beginning of the detached viewing experience and we are slowly pulled away from each and every character as the film continues and that is where the problem lies.

There is no champion to root for, no emotional base, just annoying and sad individuals caught up in a superficial world of haves and have-nots.  The film is told through a series of depositions that reflect on those involved with the creation of facebook.  Zuckerberg is a wunderkind with computer programming, but dense when it comes to human contact.  After railing against his girlfriend via the internet, he decides to hack into several college websites and create a site where everyone is able to compare the women of the campuses and Zuckerberg manages to create not only a social phenomenon but get labeled as the biggest ass on campus.

the-social-network-2010-006But his antics do not go unrecognized.  He is quickly approached by some fellow Harvard students (wonderfully underplayed by Armie Hammer) regarding an elitist type social network.  Zuckerberg is aware that he is about to be used.  After all, these guys come from a more affluent background and are not only juniors, but the lacrosse stars of the school.  They have the germ of an idea, but no clue as to how to bring it in to fruition.  Zuckerberg on the other hand sees the potential and seizes the day by getting a sixteen week head start and uses (literally) his best friend to finance the project with the upfront promise of an uneven partnership (70/30).  He later enlists the aid of Napster founder, Sean Parker (Justin Timberlake in a very juicy role), to develop facebook with his own vision and everyone else be damned.  And, they are, as the facebook social network grows with lightening fast speed catching the attention of f**kable groupies, big investors and A-hole lawyers.

The irony of it all is that we witness the growing and nurturing of this amazing social web tool while every character in the film, except for Zuckerberg’s original girlfriend, remains stunted and just a tool”¦a dick.  Is anybody wrong with their accusations against the brainchild?  Perhaps the lacrosse twins are (in this viewers opinion), but they appear as a mere stumbling block rather than a true threat.

The closest to sympathy we ever have for a character is Zuckerberg’s long suffering partner, Eduardo Saverin.  Andrew Garfield is saddled with this thankless whiny role and does the best he can to bring likability to his character while his co-star Jesse Eisenberg plays the title character in a rather cool and subdued manner.  He also brings with him a true sense of detachment which we have not seen in his other performances.  There is no likability factor here.  In the past, we have been able to relate to Eisenberg’s disenchanted or comically troubled youth pictures the same way we have with actor, Michael Cera.  In fact, some say they are practically interchangeable in their roles.  But I would have to disagree when it comes to this film.  Eisenberg delivers a far more dimensional performance that could give him a lead in future casting.

Fincher and Sorkin capture the upper crust college set beautifully.  Sorkin’s script is tight and clever while Fincher continues to wow us with his pacing and obvious style that puts him alongside some of the great directors of our time.  Once again, the only problem with the film is its publicity machine and its lack of repeatable viewing factor.  At least with “There Will Be Blood” we were given fair warning as to what we were in for and the character study was fascinating.

The trailers to “the social network” present a warm fuzzy feeling with a hint of irony.  This film is a cold heartless bitch that presents itself proudly and says watch me flex my Oscar muscles and live with it.  This is a well made film, but it does not deserve to be in a race to the Oscar.  It has the same cold detached feeling that we received from Fincher’s “Panic Room” that went virtually ignored.

Don’t get me wrong, I am a huge fan of David Fincher.  I championed “Fight Club” “Se7en” “”¦Benjamin Button” and even “Alien3″.    Other David Fincher films have been better executed, including the underappreciated “Zodiac”.  “the social network” is one of the slicker films out this year, but lacks the heart of what makes us enjoy the social experience of watching movies with others.

October 1, 2010

Trailer Park: IDIOTS AND ANGELS, GET HIM TO THE GREEK

Filed under: Reviews,Trailer Park — Tags: , , — admin @ 1:26 am

By Christopher Stipp

The Archives, Right Here

Check out my other column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

Idiots and Angels – Review

plymptonHow do you look at a blank canvas and create a world where you are held back by language but want to tell a story that anyone can understand?

Artists have been doing this for thousands of years, trying to distill the innate things that connect every human being regardless of time or geography. Animator Bill Plympton may not be a Flemish master but his latest feature length film, Idiots and Angles, transcends every normal narrative construction and delivers a wonderfully realized world where a story about redemption doesn’t feel rehashed or tired.

When we come into the world of Angel we are brought not only into the world of a man whose sole objective seems to be how much more angry he can be than the day before but we’re introduced into a world where there is no dialogue, no voiceover, no transitions. In fact, the world feels particularly unique as Plympton’s animation is given to fits and starts of natural movement, a trademark of his, with the absurd becoming absolutely normal. To wit, Angel reacts harshly to a perceived parking slight from another motorist and responds by creating a fuse into the other motorists’ gas tank whereby that car delightfully explodes as it careens down a city street. However insane this world is, though, Plympton’s use of depth and perspective never feels jarring or out of place. It just is and we accept it because it’s the character who never utters a word, Angel, that is so fascinating to watch on the screen. Through a series of grunts and guttural noises that humans universally use to show signs of great pleasure or disdain we see what a vile seed Angel is. Plympton sets up this man who is, by all intents and purposes, a just plain unlikable and does what any person looking to shake things up with a little Kafkaesque bizarreness would do with this guy: make him sprout wings.

So, what follows is a story that has Angel growing a pair of wings that obviously cause the man great annoyance. But of course they won’t come off with a little clipping, but of course he can’t get rid of them, the joy of the film comes at seeing how others would wish to use Angel as a means to their own fortune and fame. The story takes shape around the themes of exploitation and naked ambition whereby no one, not even Angel’s doctor who he goes to for help, is able to resist thinking about how their own lives could benefit from the man’s tragedy.

Take this tale where you want, Plympton’s work is easily interpretable in many different fashions as it relates to the human condition and the shameless depths people will go to satisfy their own base desires before thinking of the needs of a human being in need of actual assistance.

Ballasted by a soundtrack that is simply exquisite, helping to serve as a gentle, invisible hand guiding you through the insanity that is this man’s life when it all spins out of control, the film relies on making sure we understand that there is something to be felt for this man, this Angel. Of course, what movie about redemption could be had without mentioning the conflict that will eventually bring us to a satisfying resolution. In a movie where nothing is based on any formal laws of normalcy it would be a shame to ruin a plotline that is almost too strange to put to paper but when jealousy rears its head Angel is the only person at the center of it.

Through a series of fantastic moments that could only come out of Plympton’s own sense of how to make the insane something glorious to witness, breaks laws of physics and reality along woth it, the film ends satisfyingly with a resolution that affirms that beauty can come out of chaos and that even though things can sometimes unravel in the worst way possible, with people showing themselves to be the greedy, self-interested animals they are, that there can be that one person who shows you there is something to believe in when it comes to humanity. That there can be redemption, in whatever form it takes. The mere fact that Plympton does this without ever uttering a word, that it could transcend geographic boundaries and be comprehended by even the meagerly educated is a triumph in itself, let alone knowing this film is representative of animation that can pierce the skin and speak to something intrinsic in us all.

Get Him To The Greek – DVD Giveaway

16cdwcg6I should not have liked this film simply based on its premise.

When you consider how many people thought that Forgetting Sarah Marshall was an exercise in mediocre filmmaking there was little hope that those of us who stayed away from this movie based on that would come out to see what would be a surprising hit. Filled with genuine laughs and a surprising comedic turn from Puff Daddy himself, Sean Combs, the movie is a much welcomed reprieve from some seriously bad studio comedies this year.

So now you can own a copy of the movie that will show you why Russell Brand is indeed the real thing and why Jonah Hill will always be a clutch sidekick. All you have to do is send an entry to Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com and I’ll enter  you to win. It just doesn’t get easier than this, kids.

About The Film:

Aaron Greenberg (Hill) gets things done. The ambitious 23-year-old has exaggerated his way into a dream job just in time for a career-making assignment. His mission: Fly to London and escort a rock god to L.A.’s Greek Theatre for the first-stop on a $100-million tour. His warning: Turn your back on him at your own peril.

British rocker Aldous Snow (Brand) is both a brilliant musician and walking sex. Weary of yes men and piles of money, the former front man is searching for the meaning of life. But that doesn’t mean he can’t have a few orgies while he finds it. When he learns his true love is in California, Aldous makes it his quest to win her back”¦right before kick-starting his world domination.

As the countdown to the concert begins, one intern must navigate a minefield of London drug smuggles, New York City brawls and Vegas lap dances to deliver his charge safe and, sort of, sound. He may have to coax, lie to, enable and party with Aldous, but Aaron will get him to the Greek.

September 30, 2010

Review: THE THIN RED LINE

Filed under: DVD News,Reviews — Tags: , , — Aaron @ 3:53 pm

soapbox-header.png

The Thin Red Line

lucyline.gif

thin-red-line-bluSaving Private Ryan so thoroughly influenced action filmmaking that it’s easy to forget that not only wasn’t it the only war film released in 1998, it wasn’t even the best one. With each year, Spielberg’s war opus looks more dated, encumbered by its legendarily bad framing device and its inability to reconcile the numerous attitudes toward war into one coherent view of it.

By comparison, Terrence Malick’s The Thin Red Line looks better than ever, and I’m not even talking about the DVD quality yet. Based on the book by WWII veteran James Jones, Malick’s film is one of the most honest ever made about the brutality of war. When soldiers are relieved of duty, they don’t make speeches about staying until the job is done; they make for the next boat out with scant hesitation. When a captain assures a sergeant that he’ll get a medal for his valor, the sergeant threatens to resign in protest if his actions are cheapened by a tacky piece of metal that will only remind him of the horror he witnessed in his duty.

Yet The Thin Red Line is also perhaps the most Romantic war film ever made. What sets it apart is that it never romanticizes war. Instead, Malick, that lover of nature, takes his graceful camera through the jungles of Guadalcanal (here played by several locations in Queensland, Australia). During battle scenes no less terrifying and bewildering than those of Saving Private Ryan, Malick’s impossibly fast dolly shots give way to unrelated close-ups of wildlife, often wildlife caught in the crossfire. The only thing romanticized here is the tranquil between battle, and the war serves only to scar this beautiful land and corrupt the human beings who fight it.

trl-soldiers

There is no glory in fighting. No one on the front line wants to charge when the Japanese stage an ambush that has them in perfectly hidden bunkers with a clear line of sight over the advancing Yanks. The aged colonel shooting for a general’s star on his helmet (Nick Nolte) orders men to keep moving directly up the hill. He wants his glory, and he’ll sacrifice hundreds to get it. Only when a captain (Elias Koteas) directly disobeys him does the colonel stop to consider what he’s doing, though not before he chews out the captain in front of God and everybody. Later, when the men break through, the colonel pushes the men far ahead of the water supply in the hopes of swift victory, compounding the soldiers’ misery.

Everyone who thinks of chasing personal glory ends up dead or disgusted with the very notion of such a thing. One soldier, Pvt. Witt (Jim Caviezel) goes AWOL at the start to live with Meanesian natives. He finds a spiritual purity in the jungle and even finds a spark of light in death, though he does not celebrate it. His story forms a loose tapestry with the thoughts of others, and The Thin Red Line breaks all ordinary conceptions of a war film by wrapping up nearly all the action with an hour to spare and focusing exclusively on how the brief experience has changed the men, who think thoughts that are perhaps too Emersonian for a bunch of guys who dropped out of high school to enlist but never seem false or intellectual. For all its open revulsion with violence, The Thin Red Line finds a certain beauty in its epic tragedy, managing to show how life goes on even in the face of atrocity. As such, it’s the first war movie to operate on an emotional level besides nationalism or fear. One of the great masterpieces of the modern age.

trl-grass

Blu-Ray Specs

Terrence Malick has never made a film that could be called anything less than sumptuous, and we’ve already been treated to one Criterion upgrade of the master’s films this year (the gorgeous Days of Heaven). I do not want to spring the trap of calling this Criterion’s best-looking transfer yet – mainly because I’ve done it three times already this year, from Days to The Leopard to The Red Shoes — but let me try to capture the power of Criterion’s Blu-Ray by relating an anecdote. I woke up fairly early in the morning to watch the film before my classes started so I could tackle the extras later. As I watched, I could scarcely believe how great the image looked. About an hour in, I needed to rub my eyes, so I went to take off my glasses. I wasn’t wearing them. In my half-awake stupor I’d simply put on the film and then been transfixed into sobriety. Upon actually putting on my glasses, the image looked twice as magnificent. Criterion thoroughly cleaned up a transfer that wasn’t bad to begin with (check comparisons here, resulting in a crisp, evocative picture quality that compounds the splendor and poetry of the film.

I was amused by a blurb of text that appeared when I selected the play button on the Blu-Ray menu. It said, “Director Terrence Malick recommends that The Thin Red Line be played loud.” As I soon learned, you don’t have a say in the matter. The DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1. mix is equal to the picture quality in overwhelming power. The bass will rattle your teeth. Rear channels pick up subtler sounds (especially the ambience of the flashback sequences), and no sound is ever drowned out by other noise. Zimmer’s score works in tandem with the sparse dialogue, which is crisper than ever.

Extras

When Criterion first confirmed The Thin Red Line (even before they announced a release date), fan speculation built to a frenzy. Would the fabled original cut – lasting some 5-1/2 hours – be included? Well, no, and the eight outtakes included only amount to 14 minutes of additional footage. But even these 14 minutes are arresting, especially a poignant cameo by Mickey Rourke as a sniper.

A number of other extras are partitioned according to an aspect of the film. There’s a feature on the astonishing cast Malick put together, a piece on the music, the editing, the actors’ own opinions on the film, even input from James Jones’ daughter. Old newsreel footage of the Guadalcanal siege is included, as is a brief collection of Melanesian songs with production stills. Rounding out the features are the theatrical trailer and a commentary track by production designer Jack Fisk, producer Grant Hill and cinematographer John Toll that details the storied production of the film, the themes and so on.

An accompanying, 36-page booklet reprints David Sterrit’s essay on the film and an old essay by James Jones in which he decries war films for glamorizing battle.

Final Thoughts

The Thin Red Line contains majesty without being majestic, because such an attitude would lend itself too much to a love of the war on-screen. It never loses its beauty no matter how many times I watch it and I continue to marvel at just how completely, yet subtly, Malick turns every big-budget war film trope on its head. I would not call myself psychic for being able to predict that Criterion’s Blu-Ray will make the short list of nearly every year-end poll for the best home video release. Image and audio quality are simply to die for, and the extras are dense and rewarding. Most of the extras were made for this release, and the majority of what wasn’t hasn’t been seen before. I don’t really bother writing pans for my contributions here, so it must seem that I’m generally in love with any Blu-Ray I pick up. I cannot sufficiently stress, however, just how incredible this release is. I’ll wait until the end of the year so I don’t have to take my foot out of my mouth later, but the other studios (and even Criterion) have their work cut out for them if they want a more impressive release by December.

trl-native

Jake Cole is a journalism student at Auburn University, where he regularly avoids people in favor of writing about film, television and music on his blog, Not Just Movies. When he is not writing movie reviews, he is inevitably writing something else and will continue to do so until he runs out of excuses not to go outside.

September 27, 2010

Review: THE WORLD

Filed under: DVD News,Reviews — Tags: , , — Aaron @ 1:34 pm

soapbox-header.png

The World

lucyline.gif

Jia Zhangke has touches of Kiarostami, Ozu and Antonioni in him, yet he’s ultimately as singular as any of the three. The World, his fourth feature and first to be officially approved by government censors, is no less sincere, indeed scathing, a critique of China’s cultural displacement, caused by the advent of a highly capitalist economic system paired with a lingering dictatorial grip on the social liberties of the people.

Set in an EPCOT-like theme park that included miniature copies of the world’s most famous landmarks, Jia’s film juxtaposes the run-down, Communist housing with the influx of free enterprise capitalism of the amusement park, illustrating how the country is trapped between a system that failed the people terribly and one that does not offer much hope to the majority of China’s 1.3 billion people. Most of the film’s characters work in the park, and all of them lack the resources to leave to perhaps visit one of the real landmarks contained within Beijing World Park.

the_world_title

Tao (Jia’s muse and second wife Zhao Tao), works as a dancer in a theater troupe that dresses according to whatever nationality it’s assigned that day. Even the humans are made into simulacra of true culture so tourists can take their asinine photos by landmarks (at least this park could attract all the people of the world who think world travel is all about a few snapshots of the most famous building in sight). Workers speak casually of going to Japan or India because they are speaking about sections of the park, yet they view passports as magic tomes. Passports and visas represent freedom, the power to escape to a place that might offer some stable mode of life.

One could easily compare the alienation between the characters of the park to that of the heroes of Antonioni films, but Jia does not settle for copying the Italian poet, instead analyzing a modern way of life that even Antonioni could not have foretold. Tao cannot connect with her boyfriend Taisheng when they are together – her chastity symbolizes this – yet text messages launch animated reveries of flight and freedom. These segments represent truly personal fantasies compared to the broad fantasies offered by the park. Jia stresses this point when he shows Tao and Taisheng making out in a mock airplane, fulfilling a sort of wish to join the Mile High Club (as well as flying away from here), only to cut to an animated segment of Tao flying outside the plane that feels more sensual and liberated. Why should text messages, the most impersonal and brief of communication models, inspire such moments of emotion? Perhaps the gap in conversation for each person to read and absorb the message; after all, look at some of the correspondence of even the most uneducated soldier in the times before telephones, when a simple update from the field could be a work of enduring literature. Sometimes, the most indirect means of communication results in the most personal revelations.

the_world_animation

The same holds true for the friendship between Tao and Anna, the only supportive and genuine relationship in the film. Anna is a Russian trying to reach her sister in Mongolia, and she doesn’t speak a word of Mandarin. Tao doesn’t know Russian either, yet the two find ways to communicate with each other. As Tao settles deeper and deeper into the futility of her life, the noose tightens around Anna. Someone steals her passport to make her more pliable, and when she and Tao run into each other at a karaoke bar that implicitly doubles as a brothel, we intuit that Anna has been forced into prostitution. Though neither knows what’s bothering the other, they share a moment of mutual grief that is as affecting as any exchange between lifelong friends.

Taken with a scene showing a family receiving workman’s compensation for the death of a loved one in a construction accident, the exchange with Anna clearly visualizes the director’s anxiety over capitalism, which China has embraced with such zeal that it’s inevitable that money will be able to buy flesh, in one form or another. Yet these are both searing, human moments, there for more than metaphorical weight, and Jia’s blend of humanism with visual poetry elevates him to the highest levels of modern filmmaking.

My only complaint about the film is not really a complaint at all. Its ending is elliptical, potentially a reference to Jean-Luc Godard’s Pierrot le fou and just outright confusing. Yet it’s not antithetical to anything that came before and possibly works as the final means of freedom from a world that seems so stifling for those without the means to explore it. Even if repeat viewings don’t help me unpack these last three minutes, what came before is so beautiful, so masterful and so reflective that I will return to The World for the rest of my life.

Blu-Ray Specs

UK company Eureka! have released The World to their vaunted “Masters of Cinema” label. This Blu-Ray only release is region-free and will play on any Blu-Ray player.

The great joy of companies like Eureka! and the Criterion Collection is their attention to detail in restorations. The MOC Blus of F.W. Murnau’s silent classics, for example, imbue octogenarian films with new life. Yet one cannot deny that films shot on HD look even better in Blu (see Criterion’s incredible transfers of The Curious Case of Benjamin Button and Che), and the transfer of Jia’s HDCAM footage looks astonishing. Flesh tones are realistic while colors pop off the screen. Even the banality of the bunker-like homes where city-dwellers live look beautiful in high definition. The World is a gorgeous film, and it’s immensely satisfying to see it get the treatment it deserves with so many of Jia’s films resigned to poor-quality DVDs on both sides of the Atlantic.

Audio isn’t as big a factor, but I detected no pops or hisses, a necessity in a film that relies on space and uncomfortable silence so much of the time. Dialogue is crisp even in the most defeated whispers, and the subtitle track appears to be a thorough translation.

Extras

the_world_bdTony Rayns on The World – Rayns contributes a beautiful essay to the Blu-Ray’s booklet written in the updated context of Jia’s full filmography to this point, and this 21-minute feature manages to rehash almost none of the details of the critic’s written contribution. Rayns’ taped segment gives a broad background of the director’s life as a government-educated filmmaker who got his start making unapproved, underground features and even saw the films that informed him via surreptitiously obtained bootlegs.

Also included is a 68-minute making-of documentary, “Made in China,” a fittingly wry title for a companion piece to a film as ironically named as The World. The documentary covers the film from preproduction as Jia finally decides to submit a script to the authorities to avoid imprisonment for working outside approval through shooting. The portrait we get of Jia is fascinating. We see a man who cares more for the social than the political concerns of the Fifth Generation filmmakers that put China at the forefront of cinematic invention in the late ’80s and ’90s. He’s an insightful filmmaker, as analytical about and emotionally invested in the actual process and the crews he chooses as he is the themes of his work. He’s so superstitious that he and his crew engage in Chinese religious rituals before shooting

So captivating is Jia, with his pudgy, childlike face and unforced intelligence, that I could watch this hour-long documentary and turn around and adore the best feature in the set, a 25-minute interview with the director. He offers a broad overview of his career to that point. He speaks of his films and what he wishes to say with them, the issues of censorship, his style and other matters. The interview is revelatory and presents Jia as a remarkably thoughtful man whose intelligence does not overwhelm his emotions and values.

The aforementioned booklet is one of the finest put out by MOC, perhaps second only to the jam-packed novella that was the booklet for Godard’s Une femme mariŽe. Besides Rayns’ essay, MOC includes an essay by Jia in which he argues for the re-emergence of “amateur cinema” in which filmmakers will tell stories that affect them in ways they envision rather than simply aping the preconceived notions of film technique. Critic Craig Keller contributes a piece on the film’s ambiguous ending and offers an explanation similar to my own, though his arguments approach the same conclusion from angles I did not consider. The most amusing inclusion is a government-sanctioned release about Beijing World Park originally included in the press booklet for the film. It’s the ultimate display of the Chinese government’s hypocrisy, using their Maoist control to essentially advertise an amusement park.

Final Thoughts

I cannot say whether The World is Jia Zhangke’s best film, but it certainly makes a strong case for consideration on the short list of the decade’s best films. Jia would go on to blend documentary and fiction with his subsequent movies. In the making-of documentary, Jia notes that China’s social control is lessening, that the censors who approved this feature were different from the ones who forced him underground for give years. He noted that this slight change was not worth celebrating, and he sounded like a man on a mission to see the country through to some form of freedom. With The World, he examines one possible method of delivery, capitalism, and concludes that it doesn’t fundamentally change anything any more significantly than the slight lenience of the censors signals artistic liberation. That’s why the film is so sad: its maker is unsure whether he’ll ever see a truly free China, or if the rest of the planet is in similar straits. But just because it’s meditative doesn’t mean it isn’t beautiful, and Eureka’s transfer is one of the most gorgeous of the year, and the extras are truly about quality over quantity. Highly recommended.

Jake Cole is a journalism student at Auburn University, where he regularly avoids people in favor of writing about film, television and music on his blog, Not Just Movies. When he is not writing movie reviews, he is inevitably writing something else and will continue to do so until he runs out of excuses not to go outside.

September 23, 2010

Review: SE7EN

Filed under: Movie News,Reviews — Tags: , , , , , , — Aaron @ 7:55 am

soapbox-header.png

Se7en

lucyline.gif

Undoubtedly meant to capitalize upon the eminent release of his latest feature, The Social Network, the reissue of David Fincher’s breakthrough Se7en is a reminder of both how far the director has come from a music video director and the de facto cartographer of late-’90s urban malaise and how much he has remained the same. His modern films, even the crime thriller Zodiac, lack the grime that cakes and festers in his early works, but they retain that sense of dreadful hollowness.

Underneath the aesthetic distance of his deep-focus photography, however, is a clear morality. Occasionally, it’s sneering, as it was in Fight Club, with its (justly) condescending look at emasculated fools, but for the more part he’s astonishingly sincere. Zodiac filled the gaps in the real-life investigation by focusing on the effects of unsolved murders on those trying to solve it. Contrary to the “Forrest Gump-redux” accusations leveled at it, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button is ephemeral, not a lazy tour through important events so much as a meditation on how quickly those moments pass for those who experience them.

se7en_title

Looking back on Se7en within the context of Fincher’s second period, even the grisly murder-thriller can be said to be inherently moral. Its protagonist, Detective Somerset (Morgan Freeman), lives on the brink of nihilistic despair, the same sort that grips Sheriff Bell in Cormac McCarthy’s later No Country For Old Men. With a week left until retirement, he doesn’t want anything remotely complicated to fall on his desk so that he can retreat to the countryside without any more ghosts that will already tail him out there.

Naturally, fate intervenes, and, despite his wishes, he cannot stop himself from helping his replacement (Brad Pitt), when a serial killer begins leaving crime scenes modeled after the seven deadly sins. Each of these murders is more sickening and disturbing than the last, and the extremity yet sound science of the setups positions the film neatly at the middle of the two most notable pop culture items to be inspired by the film: Saw and C.S.I.

Fincher, at last freed from the yoke placed on him for his feature debut, Alien3, displays the range of his visual talents and establishing many of his trademarks, from the aforementioned deep focus to low-angled tracking shots. Everything removes the audience even as the story grips us tighter and tighter, creating the effect of being pulled apart that only compounds the stomach-churning feeling that the film engenders. Yet by removing himself aesthetically, Fincher prevents himself from getting too into what he’s depicting. Because of this, he never focuses too lasciviously on the murders, even staging the horrific Lust murder in an ingeniously roundabout manner that gives us all the details but leaves the true image of the death for the audience to create in their minds. This remove would serve him even better on Fight Club, but it allows him to remain on Somserset throughout the film.

At its core, Se7en uses the perverted religious fundamentalism of the murders to restore Somerset’s humanity. Unable to walk away from the case in good conscience, he at last realizes that there is something worth fighting for, that Mills, for all his arrogance, is a young man with ambition and a wife (Gwyneth Paltrow) who loves him. Plenty of films use horrific events to restore a religious faith (see Signs), but the great irony of this film is that Fincher uses atrocity based in religion to bring about a genuine humanity, one free of any obligation to anything save the people around us. When Somerset tells his captain that he’ll be “around” after the shocking climax, we realize that, rather than retreat from a world that terrifies him, he will instead continue to help in order to prevent something like this from happening again. So, the greatest surprise and twist of Se7en may have nothing to do with the plot; the biggest revelation is its beating heart.

se7en_space

Blu-Ray Specs

It should come as no surprise that a David Fincher film would look good on Blu-Ray – the court submits Fight Club, Zodiac and The Curious Case of Benjamin Button as Exhibits A-C – but I was blown away by Warner’s director-approved remaster. The sickly green and scabbed yellow-brown palettes pop off the screen, while the film’s attention to detail benefits from the heightened resolution. Black levels do not appear crushed nor blue, and the density of the film’s deep use of shadows has never looked so good.

The audio, too, has been bolstered impressively. The DTS-HD MA 7.1 track is both nuanced and powerful, with the incessant rain crashing around the speakers and the creaks of rotting buildings echoing until your brain rattles. Technically, this is one of the finest releases of the year, up there with the crop of Spielberg releases that hit the market in 2010 and pushed home theater systems to the limit.

Extras

Most of the supplemental features are reproduced from the Platinum Series DVD released all the way back in 2000. Fortunately, those extras were voluminous and so thorough that one could hardly expect any major expansion. Se7en comes with four packed audio commentaries, each involving Fincher and focusing on a specific section of the cast and crew. Remarkably, there is barely any overlap between the four, as Fincher is on-point in all of them and adapts perfectly to each scenario. Listening to him casually shoot the shit with his actors even as he displays a keen insight into their performances, as well as dissecting the nuances of Andrew Walker’s script helps one understand that the director is about more than the visuals. Deleted scenes and standard EPK material also makes the disc, but the addition of bonus material centered on the remastering job done for the Blu-Ray. If simply watching the film doesn’t convince you of the strength of this transfer, just take a gander at the comparisons offered between the old theatrical cut and this reissue. They even compare the audio tracks as well

Final Thoughts

Warner’s Blu-Ray collection has been exceedingly rewarding almost across the board, and Se7en is one of their finest jobs yet. I would have liked to see a supplemental feature about the film’s impact a decade later and how you can trace both torture porn and the rise of forensic shows to the film, but then that road also leads to a lot of back-patting and redundancy so perhaps it’s for the best that no real retrospective was planned. Even without much in the way of new extras, the transfer alone justifies any hesitation you might have over double-, even triple-dipping. Se7en has never looked so good, and if you’re like me, you might be surprised at how much more is going on beneath the plot turns that make this a film that warrants repeat viewings and deeper consideration.

se7en_power_lines

Jake Cole is a journalism student at Auburn University, where he regularly avoids people in favor of writing about film, television and music on his blog, Not Just Movies. He aspires to be a critic, partially out of his love for film but mainly because he’s always dreamed of living a life of extreme poverty.

August 28, 2010

Soapbox: Our Last Best Hope

Filed under: Articles,Reviews,TV News — Tags: , , , — Aaron @ 10:20 am

soapbox-header.png

Our Last Best Hope

lucyline.gif

Two months ago, I had never seen an episode of Babylon 5. I had heard of it, and I was a fan of a lot of the comic book writings of the Babylon 5 creator, J. Michael Straczynski but I had no desire whatsoever to watch the show. There wasn’t any hatred of the show or any real reasoning behind the fact that I hadn’t seen it. It was just one of those things that I hadn’t gotten around to in my life. There are plenty of things in this world that I haven’t gotten around to doing yet, and I have to be honest when I say that shortening that list by watching Babylon 5 wasn’t very high on my list of priorities.

sword-logo

But”¦.if I’ve learned nothing else, I’ve learned that I should listen to the advice of my friends. So on the advice of one friend and the insistence of another, I said I’d give Babylon 5 a shot and see if it was a good as they said it would be. Comparisons were made to Joss Whedon and Firefly, so the bar was set pretty high and I went in expecting to be disappointed. I had read Straczynski’s work on Spiderman and Fantastic Four and in particular his amazing, creator owned series Rising Stars so I knew that he was a great writer, but Whedon comparisons still seemed like they might be a bit far fetched.

Once I took the plunge and started watching, I was hooked. Babylon 5 currently consists of one hundred and ten episodes of the hour long TV series, seven ninety-minute TV movies and a short lived spin-off series called Crusade which lasted for 13 episodes (one less than Whedon’s short lived Firefly) and it took me less than fifty days to devour the whole lot.

Even before I watched the first episode, what struck me was the age of the show. Having premiered in 1993, the show is only one year away from being legally old enough to drink alcohol and vote, though obviously not at the same time. But given the state of Irish politics, that could actually happen more often than one may think. The reason that I was looking at the year of production was that in the initial recommendation of the show that I received, I was also given the caveat that the special effects, and in particular the exterior space effects were a bit dodgy by today’s standards. The effects that were used throughout the shows and the movies were revolutionary at the time, and Babylon 5 was the first science fictions show to solely use computer generated imagery for the exterior space scenes. While I will concede that the exterior effects aren’t quite up to the standard of Firefly or any Star Trek series since The Next Generation, the effects are not what the series is about. The main selling point of Babylon 5 has always been the quality of the writing and acting on offer.

sheridan

The series’ time line ranges from the year 2245 to 2281 and though the majority of the one hundred and ten episodes of Babylon 5 happen within the five years between 2258 and 2262 we get to see glimpses of Straczynski’s universe as far back as one thousand years and as far forward as one million years in to the future. And in a million years’ worth of narrative, there was almost no errors in continuity save for a few who-met-who-and-when inconsistencies in the movie In The Beginning. Straczynski famously spends ten hours of each day writing and he clearly spent a lot of time sketching out the in-universe chronology, framework and character histories. Some of Straczynski’s planning was made apparent through big revelations like the history of Valen. Some of it was always present but never explained or even mentioned on screen, like the mystery of why Walter Keonig’s character never unclenched his left fist. Out of the one hundred and ten episodes in the show’s run, Straczynski wrote ninety two, and holds the record to this day for writing fifty nine consecutive episodes ranging from the second season through to the fifth. The run was broken by an episode written by Neil Gaiman, which is the only episode in Season Five of the show not written by Straczynski.

One of the reasons that I didn’t watch Babylon 5 when it originally started airing on this side of the Atlantic was that I felt that it was too similar, too much of a rip off of Star Trek: Deep Space Nine. But in fairness there was also a time when I didn’t listen to Bill Hicks because I thought his material was too similar to Denis Leary’s. You live and learn.

The similarities at first are obvious and plain for anyone to see. The two shows are about space stations that are located near a travel hub and have titles that end with a number Both space stations are home to a myriad of different races, some of which have been at war with one another in the recent past. But there are more subtle similarities than that. In the early days of each show, the story was primarily based on the respective space stations but after a few seasons, both shows introduced a top-of-the-range starship that was initially the only one of its kind but later would serve as the namesake for an entire class of ship. The two shows also heavily featured a storyline involving a war with a mysterious enemy from a different part of space, and in both series it’s arguable that the representative for the two respective enemy races was the main villain for both series. These may still see like fairly obvious comparisons but consider the fate of two characters, both of whom were minor players in their own universes but still managed to rise to prominence. Rom in Deep Space Nine and Vir in Babylon 5 both served much the same purpose and had the same fate. In both cases, Rom and Vir played second fiddle to a decadent master who seemed to embody the classical virtues of their respective societies.

londo

Rom was the subordinate to his brother Quark. Quark ostensibly was the perfect Ferengi, dishonest, greedy, amoral and devious. But underneath all of Quark’s bluster and protestations was a being who knew the difference between right and wrong, whether Quark liked it or not. And most of the time, Quark didn’t like it. In the face of a crumbling society and a leadership that was less than capable, Quark fought to keep alive the traditions that he believed in and fought to keep alive the world that he believed in. No matter how much his home changed or how much his own people changed around him, Quark tried to uphold the principles that he was brought up to believe in. In Quark’s mind, contact with humans didn’t weaken him or corrupt him, it merely provided him with more opportunities for profit. Quark was an old school Ferengi who stood for everything that he felt his society should be.

In Babylon 5, Londo Molari shared a lot of character traits with Quark but ultimately was a much more tragic character. Like Quark, Londo stood for very thing that his world used to represent. Londo was never a child or at least he never had a childhood. He was brought up from a very young age to believe in the ways of his world and never wavered from the duty that the devotion to his world. Where Quark’s ambition always outweighed his ability to succeed, Londo ended up getting exactly what he always desired. Though as he said himself, he had all the power in the world and absolutely no choices. Londo is one of the greatest tragic characters in any form of literature.

Neither character though would ever have thought that their subordinates would end up rising to the positions that they did. But that’s only because neither Londo nor Quark knew that Deep Space Nine borrowed pretty liberally from the Babylon 5 series bible and scripts.

It’s difficult thing to write about a subject as expansive as Babylon 5. No matter how much you write, there’s bound to be more unwritten. Even if I wrote of character-trap doors, O’Neill cylinders, Newtonian physics, the numerous Lord Of The Rings references, the numerous 1984 references, the outstanding quality of the guest stars, the speeches that were in the show, and Straczynski’s naming of the show’s two main characters after himself; I’d still be leaving out more than I care to admit.

gkar

No matter though how much I write or how much I neglect to write, there’s no way that I could possibly cover the subject of Babylon 5 without mentioning G’Kar. G’Kar is, in my humble opinion one of the finest fictional characters ever created. Often serving as a counterpart to Londo Mollari, G’Kar ran the gamut from arms dealer to loud mouth comic relief Ambassador to resistance leader to leader of his people to prophet and explorer. On his own, G’Kar was a magnificent creation, but his constantly changing relationship with Londo was often the heart of the series. From the beginning, we are told that Londo is destined to die at the hands of G’Kar, so their evolution of rivals/enemies/colleagues/co-conspirators and finally ending up as friends was a joy to watch. Londo’s destiny was indeed fulfilled and we got to see it from a few different perspectives, but it wasn’t what he or we initially thought it to be.

More than any other character on the show, I think that G’Kar became the voice of Straczynski on the show. G’Kar was able to rail against tyranny and speak about the search for meaning in religion, extol the virtue of kindness to your neighbour and deliver one of the best farewell scenes that has ever been committed to celluloid. G’Kar got most of the best lines and best speeches in the show, and Andreas Katsulas who played G’Kar delivered the lines as few could have and brought the character on his odyssey in a truly believable and relatable way. Even if he did look like a snake.

Babylon 5 truly is a novel made for television with sweeping story lines, interweaving character arcs, joy and heartbreak Neil Gaiman, in the introduction to the first trade paperback collection of Straczynski’s Rising Stars stated that Straczynski had done the impossible with Babylon 5. Ironically enough, Gaiman’s Sandman comic book series was then one of the few times that a similarly impossible task had been achieved. And it’s no exaggeration to state that Babylon 5 paved the way for modern day shows like Lost which also have large casts and preplanned story arcs.

station1

Throughout the five year run of Babylon 5, the opening monologue was different each and every year, changing to reflect the status of the story in each year. But one thing remained constant each year, and that was the use of the words “Our last best hope”. I don’t think that it was strictly accurate though, I don’t think that it was our last best hope, I think it was an example of how science fiction should be done, and how a story should be told. I think it’s our best example.

Simon Fitzgerald

August 12, 2010

Review: THE GHOST WRITER

Filed under: Reviews — Tags: , , , — Aaron @ 3:20 pm

soapbox-header.png

The Ghost Writer

lucyline.gif

ghost_writer_dvd

The Film

Roman Polanski’s The Ghost Writer reconfigures his magnum opus, Chinatown, for the modern era. Like Jake Gittes, the unnamed protagonist (Ewan McGregor) is an acerbic, indifferent middle class working man who finds himself wading into a conspiracy that dwarfs him until he cannot hope to get the truth out. The difference is scale: made in the ’70s and set in the ’30s, Chinatown was about the total corruption of city government, collusion between business and authority until the aristocracy could do as it damn well pleased. But The Ghost Writer takes place in the present, in a time when everything is multinational and conspiracies can be worldwide.

Ostensibly about a titular ghost writer hired to edit the memoirs of Adam Lang (Pierce Brosnan), former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, following the death of his first ghost, Polanski’s thriller quickly exposes its hilariously off-kilter setup for the MacGuffin it is. Instead, he delves into daring political material, taking the knowledge of America’s involvement in installing puppet leaders in Third World nations to a terrifying possibility: what if the United States performed similar covert operations to ensure the cooperation of our strongest allies, and is that not why they are our allies to begin with?

We travel to meet Lang in a hideaway island off Martha’s Vineyard, in a locked-down complex with far too much security to protect the manuscript of a memoir that the Ghost himself notes no one will want to read anyway. Soon, however, the reason for the isolation becomes clear: back in the UK, Lang faces charges for war crimes for allegedly turning over British citizens of Arab descent to the US for torture. The Ghost, who railed against political soft shoeing in the memoirs of public officials, suddenly finds himself a part of Lang’s inner circle, even drawing up a press release to deflect this attention. As Lang’s assistant/mistress Amelia (Kim Cattrall) tells him, “That makes you an accomplice.”

Like Scorsese’s Shutter Island with a political instead of emotional interest, The Ghost Writer above all else shows an aged director at the top of his visual game, reworking Hitchcock pictures like Notorious where Scorsese dabbled with Vertigo. Nothing moves quickly in The Ghost Writer, and each shot is as visually sumptuous as anything seen in the last few years. Polanski uses the mise-en-scene and lighting primarily to lay on the word ghost: light sources do not illuminate the darkness so much as create tiny balls of pale white light floating in the middle of pitch blackness. Lang’s compound conveys a purgatorial feel, always covered in clouds and a cold wind as wall-sized windows make it impossible sometimes to tell if people are inside the house or out and a servant constantly sweeps leaves into a wheelbarrow as the wind scatters them again. The opening montage alone, communicating the death of the first ghostwriter without showing any action, is a masterful way of documenting the idea of a ghost, showing all the signs of Mike’s death long before he finally gets to a shot of his corpse washing up on the island beach. And then there’s the playfulness, from a security drill going off just as the Ghost starts snooping, and a tracking shot at the end that last so long it becomes comical, until it keeps going and becomes tense once more.

gw_twilight

Polanski also retains his gift for working with actors. Tom Wilkinson and Eli Wallach give fantastic cameos, while Brosnan perfectly captures Lang’s shameless self-promotion, his vacuous deflection of serious charges leveled against him. McGregor, one of the more reliable actors of his generation, does not make us care all that much about him as a person, though we’re not meant to. Instead, he serves as our proxy for shock and revulsion as he follows the clues to the truth. But it is Olivia Williams who steals the show as Lang’s wife, Ruth. Tasked with the most complex role, Williams plays Ruth as an ice queen, resentful of the political aspirations she sacrificed for her husband. The great irony of Polanski’s career, given his personal issues, is that, more than nearly any English-language director, he understands women. Just as he used his horror filmRepulsion to subvert the image of the Hitchcockian ice queen by showing how men like Hitchcock tortured her into her emotional distance, so too does he undermine the image of the politician’s wife. He gives Ruth an air of tragedy, a strong woman far more politically capable than her husband who had to become nothing but a prop because that was expected of her. And then Polanski undercuts the character yet once more, and suddenly Williams’ performance becomes even more layered.

On some level, Polanski intends The Ghost Writer to expose the hypocrisy of the United States, who demands his extradition so they might put his head on a stake yet are one of the few nations to refuse to recognize the International Criminal Court and extradite wanted people there (along with such places as Israel, North Korea and Iraq). On one hand, this is incisive, communicating the disgust of the director, who narrowly escaped the Holocaust in Poland as a child but lost his mother to the camp at Auschwitz, at America for so openly embracing war crimes as a foreign policy. This is more confrontational than nearly anything made about the War on Terror to this point, and his refusal to soften the message when so many Hollywood directors cannot commit to their supposed liberal screeds (depending on which pundit is discussing them) even as he never lapses into polemics makes for the best political thriller since perhaps the heyday of Alan J. Pakula’s ’70s work. On the other hand, it is yet another example of Polanski’s decades-long pity parade at being unable to travel where he pleases for bailing the States to escape from his rape sentence. He may have a point that his individual crime does not warrant the level of outrage that should be directed toward certain members of government would instantly receive life imprisonment from The Hague (when Polanski was a child, they’d be swinging from gibbets), but there is still a subtext of rampant arrogance that nags at me as a fan who would still like to see him brought to justice.

Still, there’s no denying the slow-burning thrill of a master at work, and Polanski is truly one of the greatest and most intuitive directors of all time. He never forces anything, leaving so much of the film out in the open that his scathing critiques only sink in later instead of hampering the plot with proselytizing. In the vein of masterpieces like All the President’s Men, The Insider and Zodiac, The Ghost Writer creates tension in the expectation of something happening, and when practically nothing ever does, we remain tense for fear that we’ve missed something, and the film is not empty just because it continues to lead you on until you reach the end and realize you could have relaxed the whole time. From top to bottom, this is the work of a man who no longer has to impress anyone, and there is a joy in watching him refuse to take the easy, unoriginal path at every turn.

the-ghost-writer_room

Blu-Ray Specs

The Ghost Writer is available on home video in a Blu-Ray/DVD flipper disc from Summit Entertainment (U.S.), and single disc Blus from Paradox (Canada) and Optimum Home Entertainment (U.K., where the film is known only as The Ghost). Transfers appear to be identical across the board, and my copy looked incredibly faithful to the theatrical presentation. This is a beautiful film that is rich with color even as everything has an intentionally cold, ethereal look as if shot in a hospital. It makes for near-reference quality material, crisp and sharp for extreme detail but with a nice balance of grain to prevent any waxen smoothing. The audio track is equally impressive in the same unexpected manner as the picture quality. The Ghost Writer spots a nuanced soundtrack, filled with faint background noises that test the subtlety of a surround-sound setup while Alexandre Desplat’s kooky, glockenspiel-heavy score reflects the unorthodox tension of the movie.

NOTE: Be aware, however, that the U.S. release of The Ghost Writer hit theaters with an overdubbed soundtrack to censor swear words to secure a PG-13 rating. Why is beyond me, considering that anyone who would go to a film this subtle has the emotional maturity to handle language, but Summit has inexplicable included this censored track — and only this censored track — in their home video release. I would urge interested Americans to import the Canadian disc, which of course plays without issue on all Region A players.

Extras

Sadly, none of the releases of the film appears to carry anything other than a handful of Electronic Press Kit material, all simplistic, pat-on-the-back stuff that barely goes into the film’s complexities other than to briefly touch upon the themes and style. The cast interviews are the worst, luvvie back scratching of the lowest order.

gw_toast

Final Thoughts

If the extras were more substantive, this would easily qualify as one of the best releases of the year. Picture and audio quality is superb, and the film itself is one of the few great works of an incredibly weak year. I’m still fuming over the censorship though, and the dubbing really is so obvious that I must insist that Americans import a Canadian copy. Polanski himself offered a summary of his career that he did not know what kind of movies he made other than to say that he made films for grown-ups. There is indeed a maturity to this film lacking in genre film today, and to see it made more childish through obvious and clumsy dubbing is outrageous. I know that Roman Polanski is a hot-button issue, and I certainly respect those who refuse to watch his films on principle more than I do those who look for justification for his crimes because they love his work. But I can only offer my sincere enjoyment of the movie and its ideas, and anyone in search of a great throwback to Watergate-era thrillers owes it to themselves to check out this superb piece of art.

Jake Cole is a journalism student at Auburn University, where he regularly avoids people in favor of writing about film, television and music on his blog, Not Just Movies. He aspires to be a critic, partially out of his love for film but mainly because he’s always dreamed of living a life of extreme poverty.

August 8, 2010

Trailer Park: THE DISAPPEARANCE OF ALICE CREED reviewed & a Worth Reviving

Filed under: Reviews,Trailer Park — admin @ 9:37 pm

By Christopher Stipp

The Archives, Right Here

Check out my other column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

THE DISAPPEARANCE OF ALICE CREED – Review/Giveaway

disappearancealicecreedOne of the things that struck me as I watched The Disappearance of Alice Creed, a ferocious first feature from writer/director J Blakeson, was that even though a lot of this was shot in a confined space it does not take away one iota from the thrill of what the movie aims to accomplish. What it aims for, you understand, is to have a story so good that it could all take place on a theater stage without nary a change in scenery.

Many films, like David Fincher’s Panic Room, have tried to use minimalism as a means to telegraph the claustrophobic insanity that can happen when a human being in confined in a tight space. Here, though, J Blakeson has a story of a kidnapped woman, played by Gemma Arterton, Alice, play out with remarkable results. The riveting kidnappers themselves, Vic (Eddie Marsan) and Danny (Martin Compston), aren’t just two thieves looking to kidnap a rich man’s daughter for a hefty bounty these are characters who have real emotions, real reactions. It’s so inventive in that Alice isn’t the only person capable of thoughtful introspection, it’s a masterstroke that Marsan and Compston are given roles that add complex character traits that muddy what ought to be a pretty clear cut film about how a woman is able to overcome a bad situation.

Additionally, the film excels because it doesn’t rely on the usual tropes and plot devices of a movie like this and it’s inherently more enjoyable because of it. Yes, it has twists and turns but much like a writing exercise where if you were a teacher looking to have every student in a classroom write about how you would change a tire, this is the solution that would work the best. It’s not the premise that makes it so good, but it’s the execution of it that makes it so good.

The delight, then, in seeing it’s not following the same parameters, and it doesn’t, is simply enjoying the idea that you don’t know which way the film will zig or zag. Again, Marsan, Compston, and Arterton deserve the credit for making these people so much more than mere characters but by using the script they were given, a tight one at that, and imbuing their performances with the same level of craftiness what you have is a seriously fun film that just delivers on all levels.

It’s hard to review a film that depends so much on its surprises but the movie just hums along without any slack and, thus, makes for a viewing experience that if nothing else will keep your attention until the very last twist that doesn’t feel forced or underhanded, it’s most definitely earned.

And, for those who would like to win a Disappearance of Alice Creed prize pack, and didn’t see it last week, please read on:

To help get the word out on The Disappearance Of Alice Creed Anchor Bay Films want to give one of you lucky readers a chance to win a DVD prize pack. The grand prize includes: Brooklyn’s Finest, The Crazies, Pandorum, Righteous Kill and Traitor DVDs. All you have to do is shoot me a note at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com and I’ll get you entered.

While you wait to see if you’re the one who will be anointed with these goodies go on and find Alice Creed on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/whereisalicecreed

For additional information please visit: http://www.whereisalicecreed.com

Become a fan: http://www.facebook.com/whereisalicecreed

As well, watch the first 5 minutes of the thriller: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhPNzoI__28

Good Luck!

Worth Reviving: Electra Glide in Blue – by Ray Schillaci

eleI was seventeen-years-old in 1973 and going to as many “R” rated movies as possible. It was a thrill going without my parents and even a bigger one when I found something that went beyond the simple-minded T&A or Hershel Gordon Lewis gorehound reissue. I cannot remember what prompted me to take the RTD bus all the way to the El Portal Theater in the middle of a sweltering hot & humid San Fernando Valley summer day to see a limited run, PG rated movie about a cop and the motorcycle he hated. It could have been a combination of an ultra-cool poster, a kick-ass trailer and a few critics that were going gaga over this flipside of “Easy Rider”. Whatever it was, “Electra Glide in Blue” will forever be one of my favorite films that to this day surprises everyone I introduce it to.

From the very misleading beginning the director prepares you for a story that is not going to be told in the usual fashion. Hell, the credits don’t even start until the director has wowed us with the opening scene and goes on to deliver one of the greatest introductions of a lead character in many a year. Suggestion; CRANK your sound system up for that bass-filled intro, it’s amazing.

Director James William Guercio was a composer and the producer of a little known group called Chicago Transit Authority, later shortened to Chicago. Soon after his success, Guercio was offered the opportunity to direct a film based on true events about the complicated life and eventual death of an Arizona motorcycle officer in the early 70s. What he brought to the table was a vision of pure Americana harkening back to the golden days of John Ford westerns.

In fact, when Guercio had the chance to use cinematographer Conrad Hall he not only insisted that he forego his director’s salary to afford the highly acclaimed cinematographer but insisted that he wanted to recapture the beauty of Ford’s cinematographer Winton C Hoch. A funny anecdote; Hall had informed the director that for 25 years he was trying to escape that look. Guercio compromised and gave Conrad Hall the opportunity to shoot all interior shots any way he wanted. Hall was given free creative reign with the exception of exteriors which would be true to the John Ford vision. This amalgam of imagery is a sheer delight that only adds to the richness of Robert Boris and Rupert Hitzig’s story and director Guercio’s unique vision.

Robert Blake plays John “Big John” Wintergreen (with an unusual mix of self deprecating charm, machismo and sensitivity), an Arizona motorcycle officer that yearns for higher ground. He finds his life far too simplistic and is dedicated to elevate himself to detective where he can use his mind and gain some respect. His initiation, journey and eventual disillusionment as an officer during a very volatile time for law enforcement is exhilarating, confusing and very profound. His dedication to the law and doing the right thing only brings disappointment and compounded trouble to his already complicated life.

Wintergreen is brought on to the scene of a suicide that he insists is a murder case. What unravels is a heartbreakingly honest expose of the fragility of men and the machismo they wear as a badge of honor. There are twists and turns galore that keep one second guessing, but if that was not enough, the filmmakers pull out all the stops with memorable performances played to natural perfection by top notch character actors like Royal Dano and Elisha Cook Jr. The subplots are incredibly integral and not throwaways which makes the story a complicated one at times, but pays off big in the end.

The studio (United Artists) had no idea how to market the small budgeted film (just under a million dollars) that was so way ahead of its time in the early 70s. UA played on Blake’s height; comparing him to taller officers and stating that he and old time western star Alan Ladd were the same height. They also attempted to just toss it out as another action film with the usual low budget art used for the action genre of that era. But many critics rallied behind the film declaring its power along with its breathtaking visuals. For years this film has been a misunderstood American masterpiece of cinema and to this day has not received its due. Even the 2005 DVD release had a horrible marketing cover with the declaration “He’s taking justice into his own hands.” There is nothing of the sort! Whoever threw that line in never bothered to even watch the movie.

For some, this film may be hard to watch only because of what star Robert Blake is known for today. That throws him into the category of other troubled artists; Woody Allen and Mel Gibson to name a few. I don’t even like bringing this up since it can prove to be a dicey moral dilemma. Do we turn our back on such landmark masterpieces as “Annie Hall” and “Hannah and Her Sisters” or “Braveheart” and “Apocalypto” because the artist may appear morally corrupt to our society? When faced with this, I remind myself that film is a collaborative effort and by punishing one, I am punishing hundreds of people who were involved in the making of these films. A reward can be had for pure film enthusiasts who can look past these issues.

There is no denying Blake’s powerful, multi-dimensional performance that eventually leads to his landing his own successful TV show (Baretta) for many years. Another interesting anecdote; after three very successful TV seasons Robert Blake wanted to move on. He no longer had any desire to continue on with the character and when Universal begged him for one more season Blake accepted with a ridiculous offer feeling all too well that the studio would never comply. To his surprise they did ““ paying him a higher salary and building a custom home on the studio property that would include a custom toilet seat that matched his ass. This just shows the depths that studios will sink to get what they want. When it was all said and done, Blake spent little time in his home away from home.

But it is not just Robert Blake that makes this film succeed on so many levels. It is the sheer artistry of director James William Guercio and cinematographer Conrad Hall. It is Guercio’s dynamic score set against the backdrop of Monument Valley. It is the perfect pitch nuances by supporting actors Billy Green Bush, Mitch Ryan and Jeanine Riley. And, finally it’s Rupert Hitzig and Robert Boris’ morality play that becomes an ode to law enforcement in the early 70s that made life a war zone for so many during those confused times.

Could I imagine the film without Robert Blake? Absolutely not, his stature and performance proves to be a dynamic linchpin for this beautiful film. It is mind blowing and our loss that director Guercio never went on to make other films. It is unclear as to why he never pursued that end of his career any further (with the exception of producing another Robert Blake film, “Second Hand Hearts”). Perhaps he was satisfied with his accomplishments in music having produced successful recordings for Chicago, The Buckinghams and Blood, Sweat and Tears. He also went on to develop a recording studio the Caribou Ranch nestled in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado and used successfully by such high profile artists like Elton John, Rod Stewart, Billy Joel and Waylon Jennings.

In regards to getting the chance to watch this true American cinema gem, it is available through Netflix, but you may be hard pressed to locate it at your local video store. It can also be purchased at a number of places on the net. My only beef is with the uncaring transfer that the studio (MGM) subjected us to. Yes, it’s better than the VHS version, but that’s not saying much and this is a film crying out for extras. My wish is that Criterion gets a hold of this and does the film justice with an endearing Blu Ray presentation. One that wows us like it did me the first time I set my eyes on it upon the big screen. At the time my body nearly felt thumped to death by the dynamic score blasting out of the speaker system at the El Portal. This brings back memories of when individual theaters had double bills and the word “multiplex” was only used in science and engineering.

July 31, 2010

Review: BLACK NARCISSUS and THE RED SHOES

Filed under: Articles,Reviews — Tags: , , , — Aaron @ 7:48 am

soapbox-header.png

Black Narcissus and The Red Shoes

lucyline.gif

black-narcissus-bdred-shoes-bd

The Films

You have to feel sorry for Britain’s film community. Directors don’t get recognized until they make it to Hollywood, at which point they become absorbed into the American system. Hitchcock and Chaplin were not only English by birth but by nature, predisposed to dry comedy and, certainly in Hitch’s case, dark irony. Yet they’re among the purest examples of Hollywood filmmakers, two of the five most influential directors funded by the American system, and they’re but early examples of America’s way of denying England its own cinematic glory.

As such, the relative obscurity into which Michael Powell and his frequent collaborator, Emeric Pressburger, have fallen is at once tragic and completely foreseeable. In their heyday, the British director and the Hungarian ex-pat screenwriter, operating under the moniker The Archers, could easily have secured work in Hollywood, but Powell never elected to move, perhaps aware that he was just too British. Fortunately for the British, there may be no director in the history of the medium more cinematic, save perhaps Nicholas Ray: both were first-class Expressionists, masters of color, shadow and the freedom of cinematic editing.

Black Narcissus and The Red Shoes comprise the second half of the most impressive four-year period of any director, each year marked by its own masterpiece. Starting with 1945’s I Know Where I’m Going! and continuing with A Matter of Life and Death (also called Stairwayx to Heaven, Powell and Pressburger’s gold run by no means makes up their only great films (to the edge of both bookends are masterpieces like The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp and The Tales of Hoffmann) but condenses everything the pair had to offer into four capital-R Romantic melodramas that will tear your soul to tatters.

Black Narcissus, timed with the independence of India in the same year, uses classical melodramatic technique to demonstrate why British occupation failed in the first place. A formalist triumph, the film contains arguably the greatest use of color in cinematic history (the only contender that comes to mind is Johnny Guitar). Not a single frame was shot in India, a jarring notion when faced with matte paintings, miniatures and studio sets so seamlessly combined that they look too real for a film made in the 1940s. Frankly, I cannot think of another film that uses miniatures so convincingly until I arrive at Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings trilogy over a half century later.

black_narcissus-palace

Yet the falsity of the film’s construction aids Powell on thematic and aesthetic grounds: this is a movie about what happens when people attempt to remake the world into their own image, and its chief atmosphere comes from the total control Powell and cinematographer Jack Cardiff exerted on color and lighting, control they enjoyed precisely because it was all staged. A group of nuns take residence in a palace — a former harem, no less, much to my amusement — where they seek to start a school for girls and a hospital.

Soon, however, the splendor of their surroundings begins to affect the sisters in strange ways. Juxtaposing the plain, oatmeal-colored habits with the bright dyes of the locals clothing, Powell stresses how alien the British women are, perched as they are on the face of a cliff 9,000 feet above the ground in their whitewashed, palatial whorehouse.

Rather than use the exoticism to lure the women away from their vows, Powell stresses how the environment simply unlocks latent memories and desires in foreign agents, removed from their own surroundings and more capable of seeing what’s left behind. Sister Clodagh (Deborah Kerr), the young and condescending leader of the group, starts to daydream of a past romance that drove her to the order when it failed, while another nun becomes so absent-minded and focused on something deep in her mind that she plants flowers in the vegetable patches.

Then there’s Sister Ruth, played by Kathleen Byron. Where Clodagh sours in her repression, Ruth has become a bundle of nerves, crackling buried desire with every look. Bryon’s performance is one of the great performances of madness in the cinema: you can see it when she runs into a room early in the film covered in the blood of a local patient, looking oddly pleased with herself, and the mounting of her lust for Dean (Jack Farrar), the shorts-sporting government agent and symbol of arrogant imperialism, begins to twist her physically as Byron’s mouth twists into feral grins and makeup gives her flesh the pale green/purple hue of Sleeping Beauty‘s Maleficent. Combined with Powell’s masterful pacing and artistic staging, the simple act of putting on lipstick can be more horrific than any violent action.

blacknarcissusface1

Films about lost faith and buried sexuality are somber affairs, the realm of Ingmar Bergman and Carl Dreyer. But Black Narcissus is a movie of passion, sensuality popping off the screen in every shot as the tightly structured plot takes unperceived twists and turns until it winds up a full-blown opera. Powell’s approach lifts the feature out of any single message, blending in its critical study of imperialism and its suggestions concerning the effect of religious piety on the mind and body into a sumptuous feast of color and emotion, making for what may be Powell’s most gripping adventure.

But if Black Narcissus combined eroticism with politics, the Archers’ masterpiece, The Red Shoes, filters sensuality through its purest form: art. The climactic sequence of Powell’s previous film choreographed the action to the score, preparing him nicely for a film about ballet. But just as Black Narcissus quickly broke free of its social message to spiral off into far grander territory, so too does The Red Shoes use ballet as a springboard for a larger commentary on all art.

Lermontov, the strict ballet impresario played by Anton Walbrook, is modeled after the great leader of the Ballets Russes, Sergei Diaghilev. Diaghliev was a demanding taskmaster, but he also revolutionized the art form of ballet by seeking out the newest and most innovative talent – it was Diaghliev, after all, who introduced the world to Stravinsky and supported him even when the composer’s work sparked riots among the intelligentsia.

Lermontov is no less unforgiving, but Powell digs into the character, explaining such cruelties as firing the lead ballerina for getting engaged not as the whims of an artistic tyrant but the side-effects of a dedication to art. He tells an upper-class art patron that ballet is a religion to him, and when he finally acquiesces to her wishes to audition her niece, Vicky (Moira Shearer), he asks her a test question first. “Why do you want to dance” he asks with a hint of danger, but he soon learns that Vicky isn’t just some feckless relative relying on her aunt to get famous. “Why do you want to live?” she responds immediately. “Well, I don’t know exactly why, but … I must.” “That’s my answer, too.”

Powell & Pressburger frame the central conflict of the film around this idea, making an odd love triangle with Vicky at the center. On one hand is Lermontov, representative of art; on the other, Craster (Marius Goring), the young composer who falls for the dancer. Thus, the choice the dancer must make is between physical love and love of the abstract, love of artistic expression. When Lermontov expresses jealousy toward Craster, it is not out of sexual competition but a desire to see the greatest conduit for dance he’s ever seen dedicate herself fully to the arts.

redshoes-dance

Not that sex and dance are ever separated in the course of the film’s 135 minutes. Craster, already a wunderkind, finds writing even easier with Vicky as a muse. For his part, Lermontov clearly receives his physical and emotional gratification from watching ballet, and the reason he pushes his dancers, composers and designers further than anyone else may be that he must see bolder and bolder art to continue satisfying unaddressed biological needs.

This unorthodox approach to sensuality makes the naked repression of the nuns in Black Narcissus look quaint by comparison. Despite the setbacks of social norms, The Red Shoes contains the most flagrantly sexual moment in the cinema, and it’s a sequence that has no overt connection to sex. The film’s centerpiece is an epic dance number than breaks the rules of physics, much less ballet, to communicate how Vicky views art. Earlier in the film, Powell wryly touched upon the social nature of box seats in theaters, designed to allow the higher-ups to view each other rather than watch the show, yet Vicky never took her eyes of the stage. Once she finally appears with the group, the screen explodes into Expressionistic, libidinous freedom. Vicky’s dance partners vanish into costumed outlines that exist only because Vicky must acknowledge at least that she’s interacting with an object, and at one point her chief partner morphs into both Lermontov and Craster. This is what it looks like to see a genius attuned to the craft, and Powell stresses that Vicky doesn’t care an ounce for fame when he imposes a shot of waves crashing on a rocky beach in place of the applauding audience: the crowd is just background noise behind what really matters.

red-shoes-ocean

Brilliantly, Powell allows the audience to truly ponder the question of choosing romance over art. Vicky, confined by gender roles of the day, should not have even been given the option of following her career at the expense of a relationship, but the director understands genius. Had Mozart not died at 35 but instead given up music to appease a lover, would we look upon that act as a romantic gesture, or the denial of a world-class talent to appease the whims of one lovesick individual? As Powell gave his nuns the freedom to have physical desires in Black Narcissus, he also gives Vicky the option of making a choice between two equally viable options. Whatever choice she makes will be tragic, and the film is made even more heartbreaking through Powell’s effortless control of empathy, an emotional counterbalance to the cold tricks of the other British master, Hitchcock.

If you’re still on the fence about these films, I can only point to Powell’s biggest fan to try to sell you: if you like Martin Scorsese, I can personally guarantee you will love these movies. Marty includes something of Powell into all of his films — the shadowed boxing crowds in Raging Bull reflect the subjectivity of a master focused solely on the craft and not who’s enjoying it, and Shutter Island contains open homages to both Black Narcissus (looking down the cliff) and The Red Shoes (the spiral staircase Leo climbs at the end). Scorsese even befriended Powell after the Brit found himself out of work after the better-than-Psycho psychosexual thriller Peeping Tom and his editor, Thelma Schoonmaker, married Powell. If I ever met Scorsese, we might end up mutually gushing over the Archers more than Marty’s own work, but that’s the effect Powell has on you: less cynical than Nick Ray, Powell belongs in the pantheon of directors with a pure grasp on emotion along with Griffith, Kurosawa and other rarefied names. I cannot promise that you will like these two films but — arrogant as this may be — I can say that, if you don’t, the problem doesn’t lie with Powell.

Blu-Ray specs

The restorations for both Black Narcissus and The Red Shoes were joint efforts on behalf of Janus Films (Criterion’s parent company) and the British ITV, who put out their own Blu-Rays a year ago. I’d been wondering when Criterion would finally get around to releasing copies Stateside. The wait was worth it. ITV’s single-layer discs are, judging from screenshot comparisons, perfectly suitable transfers of the restoration. The Criterion discs, however, use dual-layer BDs and take up nearly all the bitrate. The result is a crisper image, not to the point that those in Region B need to seethe but noticeable enough in places, especially on Black Narcissus. Either way, these images are breathtaking, restoring the impeccable color of Jack Cardiff’s cinematography fully. I’m happy that Criterion brought their old method of restoration demonstrations out of the box after a few studios complained in the past to show just how completely ITV and Janus cleaned up the film.

Both films were stunning even in their damaged versions, but now the imagery achieves maximum effect. The blue sky that catches Clodagh’s attention while praying in the drab chapel is even more arresting in its new clarity, as is the close-up of Vicky’s made-up face while dancing. Criterion’s restorations are often revelatory, and the work they did earlier this year with Nicholas Ray’s masterpiece, Bigger Than Life, demonstrated clearly what they could achieve with old Technicolor movies, but these are vital upgrades to two of the most beautiful films ever made, looking better even than Ray’s visual tour-de-force.

the-red-shoes-restoration

The audio is strong to boot, communicating the boisterous scores of classical filmmaking and leaving the dialogue crisp. But it’s the imagery that will suck you in time and again, eradicating the many issues of fading, scratches and blurring that plagued the weak transfer of the three-strip Technicolor when Criterion first put these on DVD.

Extras

Most of the two films’ extras come from the original DVDs, but they were among Criterion’s best supplements. A commentary track for Black Narcissus featuring the director and Martin Scorsese in particular is one of the greatest DVD extras of all time, and the discs have been fleshed out with updated pieces on the restorative efforts that went into cleaning up the film, all of which are worth a look to those who respect what specialty companies like Criterion and ITV do for classic films. There’s some inevitable overlap between making-of features and individual interviews, but overall the extras pad out the most impressive one-two punch Criterion has released this year.

Final Thoughts

Both of these films are true masterpieces, and I count The Red Shoes among my 10 favorite films of all time. I tried to keep my reviews short this time, finally remembering that my usual style is meant for those who have seen the movie, not those thinking of buying it. But I also held back because it’s all too easy to lose oneself in superlatives when discussing Powell & Pressburger. People tend to view classic films in a vacuum, as if standing behind a velvet rope in a museum, and even when people say, “They don’t make ’em like they used to,” they slip in an undercurrent of relief beneath the perfunctory regret. But Powell is one of those old filmmakers who, like Ray, could slip under your skin and break boundaries so completely that you didn’t even realize just how many risks they’d taken until you reach the end. The vibrancy of these two films, made clearer through the nearly perfect restorations, is arresting in the way that few modern films are, not because people don’t try as hard or because somehow things are only good when they’ve aged or other nonsense, but because Powell & Pressburger were as attuned to their art form as Vicky Page was to the ballet. Cinema was in their blood, and not the tragedy of Powell’s eventual artistic exile can undercut the majesty of their work. Regardless of what Powell film I watch, even ones not written by his Hungarian friend, I think of a conversation the two shared in preparation for I Know Where I’m Going!: Pressburger wanted to make a movie about a woman on an island, and the director wanted to know how she got there. Without missing a beat, Emeric replied, “Let’s make the film and find out.”

Jake Cole is a journalism student at Auburn University, where he regularly avoids people in favor of writing about film, television and music on his blog, Not Just Movies. He aspires to be a critic, partially out of his love for film but mainly because he’s always dreamed of living a life of extreme poverty.

July 23, 2010

Trailer Park: CLASH OF THE TITANS, TERRIBLY HAPPY, RAMONA AND BEEZUS

Filed under: Reviews,Trailer Park — Tags: , , — admin @ 1:19 am

By Christopher Stipp

The Archives, Right Here

Check out my other column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

CLASH OF THE TITANS – Giveaway

clash-of-the-titans-dvdI didn’t a chance to see this movie when it came out theatrically months ago but I couldn’t be more eager to see what Louis Leterrier concocted. I am an unabashed fan of both The Transporter and The Incredible Hulk so it’s only right to be at least interested in knowing how the man created a 450 million dollar box office juggernaut.

I may have to get my own Blu-ray, if you’re gonna see the Kracken you’ve got to see the Kracken in high def, but I have a copy of the DVD to give to 2 lucky readers.

All you need to do to enter is to shoot me a message at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com and give me at least one actor who played in the original film that started it all. And, as an aside, I know people knock the original for whatever reason but that movie was a touchstone in my youth as it was the first Ray Harryhausen film I came into contact with. It’s a great fantasy epic and I hope that this new version captures that same level of adventure.

Good luck!

About the DVD/Blu-ray:

Jump into a mythological world of epic action and adventure when “Clash of the Titans” arrives on Blu-ray Combo Pack and DVD on July 27th from Warner Home Video.  “Clash of the Titans” propels audiences into the mythological realm of Perseus’ quest amidst a world where the gods are formidable and the creatures even more fearsome.

The Blu-ray disc includes an exciting never-before-seen alternate ending and the immersive Maximum Movie Mode, which includes walk-ons by Sam Worthington, Liam Neeson, Ralph Fiennes, and Director Louis Leterrier, focus points, Picture-in-Picture commentary, and BD-Live connectivity.

As a war rages between men and kings and kings and gods, the battle amongst the gods is the one that could ultimately destroy the world.  Hope rests with one. Perseus, son of god, Zeus, yet raised a man, sets off on a hazardous journey deep into forbidden worlds to avenge the death of his family and defeat Hades, vengeful god of the underworld, before he can seize power from Zeus and unleash hell on earth.  Leading the charge, Perseus battles unholy demons and fearsome beasts, but will only survive if he can accept his power as a god, defy his fate and create his own destiny.

From director, Louis Leterrier (“The Transporter”, “The Incredible Hulk”) “Clash of the Titans” stars Sam Worthington (“Avatar”, “Terminator Salvation”), Liam Neeson (upcoming “The A-Team”, “Batman Begins”, “Gangs of New York”), Ralph Fiennes (upcoming “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows” Parts I & II, “The Hurt Locker”, The Constant Gardner”) and Gemma Arterton (upcoming “Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time”, “Quantum of Solace”).

On July 27, “Clash of the Titans” theatrical version will also be available ON DEMAND through Digital Cable, Satellite TV, Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 game consoles. The Unrated Cut and theatrical version can be downloaded for rental or purchase on iTunes and Amazon Video On Demand.

SYNOPSIS

In “Clash of the Titans,” the ultimate struggle for power pits men against kings and kings against gods. But the war between the gods themselves could destroy the world. Born of a god but raised as a man, Perseus (Sam Worthington) is helpless to save his family from Hades (Ralph Fiennes), vengeful god of the underworld. With nothing left to lose, Perseus volunteers to lead a dangerous mission to defeat Hades before he can seize power from Zeus (Liam Neeson) and unleash hell on earth.

Perseus sets off on a perilous journey deep into forbidden worlds, leading a daring band of warriors, including Draco (Mads Mikkelsen), an experienced soldier who encourages the defiant Perseus to make use of his god-given abilities. Battling unholy demons and fearsome beasts, they will only survive if Perseus can accept his power as a god, defy his fate and create his own destiny.

DVD ELEMENTS

The “Clash of the Titans” DVD Single Disc the following special features:

o        Deleted Scenes

The “Clash of the Titans” Blu-ray Disc contains the following special features:

o        Sam Worthington: An Action Hero for the Ages

o        Deleted Scenes

o        Alternate Ending

o        Maximum Movie Mode: Join Sam Worthington, Liam Neeson, Ralph Fiennes, and Director Louis Leterrier on an incredible journey all while you watch the movie.

Featurette Focus Points

o       Sam Worthington is Perseus

o       Harnessing the Gods

o       Zeus: Father of Gods and Men

o       Enter the World of Hades

o       Calibos: The Man Behind the Monster

o       Tenerife: A Continent on an Island

o       Scorpioch

o       Actors and Their Stunts

o       Wales : A Beautiful Scarred Landscape

o       Bringing Medusa to Life

o       Prepare for the Kraken!

o        More than forty minutes of picture in picture (PiP) commentary

o        BD-Live

o       Clash of the Titans: International Special

o        DVD Combo Disc

o       Feature film in standard definition

o       Digital Copy (Windows Media and iTunes)

RAMONA AND BEEZUS – Review

ramona-and-beezus-posterTo review this film with the usual sets of criteria usually reserved for any other movie would be unfair.

The film, a sticky, saccharine sweet yarn about a young girl’s journey though pre-tween issues isn’t very resonant. It’s not that director Elizabeth Allen’s last theatrical effort, 2006’s Aquamarine, made a bad movie but it’s just not very interesting if you’re not a girl between the ages of 5 and 12 or a woman who can identify with what it was like to be that age.

More suitable for the Disney Channel than it is a movie theater Ramona and Beezus is a movie made for the kind of parents who find a PG rating too racy or scripted television too daring. The plot does tempt with mature themes as Ramona’s (Joey King) father, played by John Corbett, is laid off from work and the family is put into a tizzy as everyone tries to figure out how to move forward in a house that is on the verge of being sold, how to deal with Ramona’s increasingly troubled behavior, and a multitude of other minor troubles that are completely germane to films like this.

Never mind debating whether the movie is representative of any kind of progressive idea or is the springboard for a budding director who is showing great promise but save for a few animated moments within the film there is nothing terribly exciting or noteworthy for a completely forgettable piece of art. However forgettable it might be, though, the movie does manage to satisfy the needs for any female child looking for a film that has enough sterile slapstick and generic goofiness which will all but avoid any kind of editing once it does make it on television.

To see how Ramona evolves as a character isn’t very satisfying as we’re essentially right where we are when we began this movie, and the only evolution any of the other supporting players has is all but obvious at the outset, and I don’t think the point for this movie to exist isn’t to push the boundaries of any narrative storytelling. Yet, it exists solely to showcase characters from a book series that, itself, doesn’t dare to be anything else other than light reading. On that account alone it succeeds in being a syllogistic representation that faithfully adheres to the characters and situations of the novels. In other words, young girls will dig this.

TERRIBLY HAPPY – DVD Review

terribly_happy_posterYou must, must check this film out. If you only make enough to buy 1 DVD, and Lord knows that is the least of your problems if you’re on that tight of a budget, make this one you get this month as this movie has still stayed with me months after seeing it. It’s available now from Oscilloscope Laboratories so do what you can to witness one of the brightest spots of the spring movie season.

Because I really am a fan of this film here is my theatrical review of the film and I hope at least one of you investigate a great movie you probably never heard of:

You have to look at a performance by Christoph Waltz in Inglorious Basterds in order to fully comprehend why Jakob Cedergren, who plays town cop Robert Hansen in Terribly Happy, deserves his own spot on the world stage.

Cedergren takes a character, an urban police offer who is exiled into a rural, remote village town after having a nervous breakdown, and twists it into a complex individual who has no predictability, no hints about what he’s going to do next. He’s thrilling to watch on screen as he is tasked with what ought to be a simple enough assignment: watch over a sleepy hollow where no one seems to even want official law enforcement. The town has its own rule of law, its own way of handling things, and Cedergren disturbs the natural order with his presence. He’s a cop who seems to engender not an ounce of intimidation or respect from the townsfolk but he does find a kindred spirit in a local woman who isn’t from around here, either, a woman with her own secrets.

The pastoral themes abound in a town that wants to keep its close knit community closed off from interlopers looking to change things and Cedergren is absolutely dynamic in a role that showcases his range, not only in ability, but in the way his character vacillates throughout the film. When we meet him he’s Superman, a hero who is absolute in his convictions and black and white-ness, but, by the end of the movie, as the town’s secrets slowly give up its dead, it’s Batman that takes over. By the third act moral ambiguity becomes the predominant theme, the line between what’s right and what’s wrong blurs in ways that haven’t been seen in modern cinema in some time.

Sure, to those who wonder whether director Henrik Ruben Genz’s film that deals with such ambiguity smacks of Cohen or Lynch-ian type of filmmaking would be right in postulating as such but that would be a disservice to a filmmaker who demonstrates his ability to craft a noir tale that does not relent. More importantly, Genz’s film is its own creation, living and breathing within this hermetically sealed world where oddity is subjective. For example, when we meet who is ostensibly the femme fatale of this thriller, Ingerlise (played by Lene Maria Christensen), she leans on Cedergren to help her escape her abusive husband Jørgen (Kim Bodnia). The outcome of what will be a face off between these two men will not only surprise you in its originality but will satisfy any filmgoer’s expectation to be entertained along with being jolted. The dark comedy that simmers below this film’s bleak palette is there but it exists only insofar in its subtlety. It won’t smack you or be ostentatious in order for you to recognize it but that’s the draw with filmmakers of this type. It makes you work for it but there is a payoff in the form of the movie’s themes.

Such a theme, like subjugation, looms large when you consider the movie deals a lot with the idea of drowning a town’s dark secrets in its bogs. Literally. Bogs play a symbolic role but, again, its use is done with intelligence, not obviousness.

The movie transcends its linguistic cadence that does take some getting used to but, once you give into how it is telling its story, the story is enveloping to the point of amazement. Amazement that this movie has flown underneath so many people’s radars because it offers so much sustenance to those hungry for a good story about a man who has to trade in some of his altruistic character in order to maintain some sense of normalcy in a town where absolutely nothing is normal.

PERSONAL SHOUT OUT

jane-doeNot that many of you would care but after 9 months of gestation I am utterly delighted and tickled to introduce my newest daughter Nina Elizabeth.

Weighing in at a whopping 8 lbs. 10 oz. this little cannonball is the reason that I was not able to make it to this year’s San Diego Comic-Con. Believe me, she’ll hear about it for the rest of her natural born life but here’s to hoping it’s a long one…I’ve got a lot of guilt to sling her way.  As Will Smith said in Independence Day: Welcome to Erf.

July 22, 2010

Essential Sounds (2010/07/22)

Filed under: Columns,Reviews — Tags: , , , , , — Aaron @ 8:01 am

soapbox-header.png

Essential Sounds (2010/07/22)

lucyline.gif

Here to help? I certainly am, banging on your ear drums this week we have five fine cuts of the freshest audio around ranging from summery shoe gazing to blazing brass sections. All your musical needs are covered for another seven days this is the soundtrack to your week this is Essential Sounds.

1. Boyfriend by Best Coast

This week we kick off with this lovely lo-fi fuzzy gem from US indie duo Best Coast. “Boyfriend” is a slice of understated magic with its soaring harmonies and sunshine swagger. The best thing about this track is its simplicity with an infectious vocal delivery, shuffling rhythm and surf rock guitars this is the best summer you ever had captured in two and half minutes, actor Bill Murray considers himself a fan and so do we

best_coast

2. Who Dat? by J.Cole

Hot off the heels from last years Warm Up mixtape and the first MC up to bat for Jay Z’s newly founded Roc Nation is J.Cole and alongside Jay Electronica he is hottest commodity in hip-hop right now. “Who Dat” is the first single from his forthcoming debut album Cole World and with so much pressure on his shoulders it shows that J.Cole really is living up to his expectations. A thumping rhythm propelled into orbit with its astonishing brass work proves that there is still a creative flare within the game. Part old school joint mixed with the gusto of a marching band “Who Dat” truly flies the flag for the up and comers in this industry.

j-cole

3. Where I’m Going by Cut Copy

Looking to build upoun the success of 2008’s “In Ghost Colours” the Australian electropop group have returned with new single “Where I’m Going”. Staying true to their musical roots but aiming a little more mainstream “Where I’m Going” shows shades of New Order’s latter work with a feel good chorus thrown in for good measure. This has a more sugary feel to it than previous material but thats not a bad thing in the slightest as it shows a real sense of fun within their work ethic. The final third of the track displays a more progressive side and has us wondering what the rest of the forthcoming album will sound like.

cut_copy

4. Can We Go Wrong by Hesta Prynn

Side stepping from her all girl New York rap troop Hesta Prynn has spread her wings and put forth this solo endeavour. The interesting thing about “Can We Go Wrong” is that like every good palette it has a little bit of everything. Fuzzy distorted bass lines and funky drumming is the core to its rhythm but over that we find almost chip tune like synth leads and a guitar riff that would make most garage bands green with envy. Hesta also drops the MC’ing for this to deliver a solid pop vocal performance. This is a brand new look for her and she seems to pull it off flawlessly.

hesta-prynn

5. Oildale (Leave Me Alone) by Korn

Digging themselves out from a pit of depression and the black hole of musical obscurity Johnathon Davis and his nu-metal pioneers really deliver with “Oildale”. It sounds like classic Korn but because that quality has been missing for sometime it also feels brand new again. Heavy percussion and rattling bass lines form a really solid background for Davis to balance delicate vocals with full on aggression an equilbrium that this group have truly mastered. If the rest of the forthcoming album Remember Me can match the quality of this then the once disgarded figures of rock could be back in buisness.

korn

Mal Foster

July 16, 2010

Trailer Park: INCEPTION and LOOK AROUND YOU

Filed under: Reviews,Trailer Park — Tags: , , , — admin @ 1:20 am

By Christopher Stipp

The Archives, Right Here

Check out my other column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

INCEPTION – Review

inception-poster-2010

A summer film that distills the best of what a blockbuster should be, INCEPTION is the thinking man’s action film that marries drama, wicked fast pacing, and the designation as the best big budget movie so far this year.

In literature, Marcel Proust’s “The Remembrance Of Things” is thought of a classic because of its exploration of memory and the acute moments that are triggered by the nature of living. It’s a familiar smell, it’s a taste that triggers flashes from a time that has forgotten. It’s a wonderful distillation of the nature of the mind and how it is able to start lines of thought merely started by a bite of Madeline cookies, a sip of tea.

To try and contain a review of Christopher Nolan’s masterstroke of space and time within the barriers of the written word is to not appreciate the multidimensional gambits he took in trying to make our own minds malleable. It’s a movie that brings together the talents of an ensemble that could not have been more well-crafted and chosen, a score that weaves its way into what’s happening on the screen as if it were the film’s sixth man that’s comes in at clutch moments, a directorial style that has all along been leading up to this moment, and a story that is nothing short of tight and lean.

To talk about this film’s plot is to take away a layer of ignorance that any person wanting to steep themselves in this world would best avoid, but merely recapping its plot doesn’t do much to diminish the astonishing moments that pepper this film’s running time.

Our protagonist Dom Cobb (Leonardo DiCaprio) is charged with one task in this film: plant a thought in a target’s mind and have them believe it to be his own. The mark here is Cillian Murphy who stars as Robert Fischer, Jr., a corporate player who Saito (Ken Watanabe) would like taken out of his way. The payoff, if this expert in thought extraction could do it, would allow DiCaprio to return to the U.S. a free man. What has kept him out of the country, what has kept him away from his children, what has made him a wanted man, is left for us to discover in small bits and bites on the way through the subconscious of Fischer, Jr.. Using a team that’s assembled of people that has more in common with Hermes than they do with the usual action movie tropes of ragtag mercenaries they all seem more likely to unwind with a glass of wine than they do handling the weaponry that takes this movie from being a clever idea and makes it a clever idea that might be Nolan’s best one yet.

The literal cat and mouse game that ensues once we get the groundwork laid about what is real in this world, what its rules are, what is possible, is without question one that filmmakers have to look at and be amazed by. What Nolan was able to do with a supporting cast that includes Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Ellen Page, Marion Cotillard, Michael Caine, Tom Hardy and Tom Berenger is something of an art itself. He was able to make every person earn the right to be on the screen and to harmoniously fit in with one another. There are no standouts, with the exception of DiCaprio’s sublime yet thunderous performance, and Tom Hardy’s real coming out party, per se but that’s the brilliance of the film. As a team they make up so much more than the sum of its parts. The synchronicity they share with one another makes this an uninterrupted experience unlike anything you’re likely to see.

What’s more, this film represents something about Nolan that many already know: he is passionate about telling a good story. Not just a story, but a good one. One that is airtight in its ability to thrill and excite you while also informing a part of human nature. All of his previous efforts are imbued with the small ways our humanity manifests itself in the acts of his protagonists and it’s no different here. Although, in this dream world the manifestations are literally interpreted on the screen, laying bare the psychoses that hobble everyone to some degree. Obviously here, a runaway train on the loose in a city street ought to be nothing less than spectacular if for no other reason than it is spectacular.

But Nolan doesn’t go the easy route as these visuals mean something more than what they are. Every piece of broken glass, every ice cold look from a passerby, they mean more than just what you’re seeing with your own eyes. The deception of inception is that everything is in front of you, nothing is hidden. Every question is answered and that’s the brilliance. What makes your mind hurt by the end of the film as you try and wrap your own sense of logic around what you’ve been presented is how it’s all right there to be interpreted. Lesser directors have made it an art form to hide its secrets, to throw out red herrings to toss you off its scent, but it’s the scent that means everything to Nolan as he made a world that feels too real.

It seems so simple that each and every one of us have a baseline with which to connect with this film. We all have to give in to our minds at night and at the very least allows for every person who sees this movie to understand, on some level, the totality of what’s going on. Examining the nature of memory was what made Marcel Proust such an unforgettable writer and it’s the very same thing that will make Christopher Nolan an unforgettable filmmaker.

Look Around You – DVD Review

look-around-you-checks-in-20100420112012536-000A television show that jettisons you back to an age when classroom instruction meant listening to an old coot ramble on about things that seemed antiquated to even the most basic of thinkers, Look Around You is a show that really isn’t for everyone.

Who it is for, however, are those who like their comedy on the subtle side, the kind of funny that comes from the absurd. What writers Robert Popper and Peter Serafinowicz managed to do was bring a piece of scientific nostalgia from the past (think Bill Nye The Science Guy circa mid 1970’s) and give it a language all its own. Look Around You examines common, scientific topics like music, water or the brain in a way that feels like they’re coming at us from that time. From a narrative and editorial standpoint these episodes wouldn’t be nearly as funny until the very laws of logic are conveniently left out of the program’s creation.

Very much like what Tim and Eric have managed to do for many, many seasons on Adult Swim, Popper and Serafinowicz deny you any chance to ground this straightforward science show in any kind of reality at all. It’s the mixture of the brilliant attention to detail and the ways in which these topics are covered as if it’s the gospel’s truth that make this a show that’s a must-see for any fan of alternative comedy.

The joke isn’t that nothing is as it seems, this could be done by any fool looking to make fun of programming from when we were children, but that no one ever gives the punchline. It wants you to go halfway and meet it as an experiment, for example, on the brain ends with the brain in question being suspended in brine and hooked up to a telephone making a phone call to the experiment conducting scientist to say how many nuts are in a jar that’s sitting in front of it. It’s truly bizarre but it’s bold in that it never feels the need to accentuate anything, nothing that would let anyone know this is all a big put-on. The level of restraint shown on this program only shows how serious they were taking this premise, of crafting a very short program of bogus science information that’s presented as if it were the truth, is something I rarely see. Performers want to let the audience in, to get them in on the joke. Look Around You is amazing in that it doesn’t give you anything but situations that you can either take or leave. It’s up to you to find the humor in the situation and that’s more than anyone could ask for out of comedians operating on another level.

About the DVD:

Look Around You is the BAFTA-nominated comedy series based on the unforgettable Open University and Television for Schools programs of the1970s. Through a series of gloriously deadpan experiments, we observe a colony of ants build an igloo, receive a telephone call from abrain, discover why ghosts can’t whistle, and reveal the largest number in the world. Science has never been so silly.

Special Features –

Advanced double-length module: Calcium
Little Mouse: full-length pop video
New exclusive commentaries featuring Robert Popper, Peter Serafinowicz, Tim Kirkby, Simon Pegg, Nick Frost, Edgar Wright, Trey Parker and Matt Stone, Michael Cera, Jonah Hill, and Tim & Eric
Little Mouse commentary by Jack Morgan (BSc)
Pages from Ceefax
Play-at-home quiz pages
Additional music by Gelg
Test card

July 10, 2010

Essential Sounds (2010/07/10)

soapbox-header.png

Essential Sounds (2010/07/10)

lucyline.gif

Fear not fellow music lovers for I am back after my slight absence, I have returned to do what I do best. Yes I am here to syringe your ears with the best cuts of new music this wonderful world has to offer. This is Essential Sounds, this is the soundtrack to your week.

1. Don’t Turn The Lights On by Chromeo

Kicking us off this week is the Canadian electro funk duo Chromeo, it seems like a lifetime ago since they delivered their seminal album Fancy Footwork. But fret no longer for they have returned with a very solid and fresh sounding single which boasts a rattling bass line somewhat akin to that of Michael Jacksons “Wanna Be Starting Something”. Strangely enough Chromeo indeed are starting something here with a song which clearly holds the 80’s close to its heart. Yet with shimmering synth work similar to Kraftwerk and an eerie swelling of glass pads “Don’t Turn The Lights On” truly is a mixed bag of magic.

chromeo

2. Lets Get Lost by Beck & Bat For Lashes

Surfing on the current crest of unique collaborations the world has been treated to this offering from Beck and Bat For Lashes. On paper it seems as if the pair might not work well together but upon hearing the track its obvious to see the duo click together on every level. First of all the core strength of the song lies within the understated percussion and the vocal delivery of Natasha Khan (Bat For Lashes) this alone creates a very haunting atmosphere which is evolved further by the presence of Beck. The combination of both voices makes for a distinct cocktail of sound which seductively slips underneath the listeners skin. Seeing as the track was recorded for the recently released Twilight Eclipse soundtrack it seems as if this is a one off but fingers are crossed for the pair to work together again.

bats-for-lashes

3. I Need Air by Magnetic Man

Anybody looking to dip their toe in to the ever expanding pool that is the Dub Step scene could do no wrong by checking out my third recommendation for this week. Magnetic Man is essentially the All Stars Team of the genre, consisting of super producers Benga, Skream and Artwork “I Need Air” is the latest offering from the group and in the eyes of Essential Sounds is an instant classic. With a rhythm that moves along with mechanical precision and alternating keys and synth leads the song cuts through the listeners brainwaves like an audible version of cult classic arcade game Ikaruga. Despite the on par and versatile instrumentation its the vocoded vocals which is the synthetic heart of the song. Magnetic Man have not only delivered an essential sound but a glimpse into the future, and the future looks beautiful.

magnetic-man

4. Albatross by The Besnard Lakes

From the opening bars of sickly sweet shoe gazing guitar tones the psychedelic journey that is “Albatross” by The Besnard Lakes begins. With rumbling drums and the enchanting vocals of Olga Goreas we are sucked into a blissful and sun kissed world of summer loving. The vocal harmonies give this number a cosmic like beach boys feel which burns out into a kaleidoscopic progression of brass instrumentation. This is very much the indie sound of Summer so if your in the absence of sunny day’s slip this number on and slide away into a sonic paradise.

besnard-lakes

5. Your Body Is A Machine by The Good Natured

Imagine a middle ground between La Roux and Florence and The Machine and you’re likely to find The Good Natured. Up beat and up tempo there is an air of mystery to the sweet delivery within Your Body Is A Machine. It’s joyful enough to be a mainstream hit but yet its mixed bag of instrumentation gives it musical credence. Ranging from almost like tribal like drum patterns to indie disco guitar riffs and overlapping harmonies. This is a dangerously infectious piece of indie pop which could make even the coldest cynic sparkle with happiness. You have been warned this lady will bleeding through speakers across the country before you know it.

good-natured-002

Mal Foster

July 9, 2010

Trailer Park: DESPICABLE ME

Filed under: Reviews,Trailer Park — Tags: , , , , — admin @ 11:31 am

By Christopher Stipp

The Archives, Right Here

Check out my other column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

DESPICABLE ME -Review

despicableme_posterThe issue with Despicable Me isn’t so much that it’s a good, albeit mediocre, kids film but it is the film’s contentment with just being average that genuinely holds the movie back from being anything more than forgettable.

With Steve Carell starring as our baddie with a soft spot for small girls, Gru, and Jason Segel as a true nemesis for our nemesis, Vector, the perceived talent is ultimately wasted on a script that depends too much on forced sentimentality where there is none and a sub-plot that seems wholly inserted just to pad out a story that is wafer thin as it already is.

Primarily, the tale of an evil mastermind who adopts three orphans under false pretenses in order to get at Vector, a new villain who is usurping this old man at every opportunity, and who surreptitiously steals an item that Gru himself was pilfering at the time, goes nowhere. As that plot fizzles like a wet bottle rocket, screenwriters Cinco Paul and Ken Daurio (both of Horton Hears a Who! and The Santa Clause 2 notoriety) insert these three orphan girls as a way to build a story about self-confidence and caring. The girls, as well, have become the centerpiece of a marketing plan that finally was able to shed some light on the question many people have had as this film neared release: What is this movie about?

Truly, this movie doesn’t know what it wants to be about, quite honestly. At one time it’s a cheeky throwback to spy films long gone, Carell rolling out his best Boris impersonation from Rocky and Bullwinkle, while  at other times it’s a hackneyed yarn about what it means to feel compassion and love when all you’ve known is how to be a villain. Believe me, the irony of the screenwriters ripping a thematic page out of Dr. Seuss’ The Grinch Who Stole Christmas after they themselves worked on a Seuss adaptation isn’t lost on me but the story is as translucent as its characters. Segel for his part proves you don’t need any finesse, or subtlety for that matter, in order to voice a character in an animated film. His speaking parts seem out of place with the mouth moving on the screen as there is no inflection, no passion for creating a truly obnoxious Bill Gates-ian kind of villain. This only compounds the real problem of this movie and it’s that in an age where every single animated movie is falling short of its Pixar counterpart you are witness to the disparities in quality from one film to another. Like an essay in school that needed to be compared and contrasted, you can see that while the animation is somewhat on par there is a reason those lamp loving animators are going home with golden statuettes year after year after year.

For example, in Toy Story 3, the moment when Buzz and Woody are in danger of being melted like marshmallows at a campfire. The music by Michael Giacchino complements the emotional punch that’s tightly shot by director Lee Unkrich. It works to draw your feelings out because everything was accounted for and executed right. Contrasting that, we get moments between Gru and the orphans that don’t earn their emotional cash-in. The composition by Heitor Pereira doesn’t work or help tie anything together in a meaningful way. It’s as if you have all these moving pieces that want to act independently of one another and what you get is exactly what this is and that’s a mediocre movie that thinks it wants to be a movie about overcoming past emotional roadblocks or a movie about turning a corner in your life in order to love something other than yourself or it’s a movie about these small little yellow creatures called minions.

But let’s talk about the minions for a moment. All things being equal, the minions would still edge out everything else in this film for bring the funniest thing your kids will see this month. These adorable little creatures thankfully steal the movie away from all of their co-stars and they barely are able to say a word. Who cares about wondering why there are dozens of them scurrying about, the true delight is that they bring so much levity and slapstick humor to a movie that desperately needed it. It’s the minions who ought to have been the focus of the film, the story from their perspective would have such a more interesting creation than we have here which is all about Gru’s obsession to shrink the moon to show the world his capacity for true evil, but I understand the aim of the film. It’s not looking to reshape animation or redefine it in any way, I get that, but when you have others in this animated space showing you how films like this can be done you have to be disappointed when films like this fall just short of the mark.

Not that any of this matters, I get that as well. The movie will make millions upon millions and will probably result in sequels and spin-offs galore. (I’ll be anxiously awaiting a poorly animated Nickelodeon series based on the lives of the minions which will probably be truly awful as they’re the edgiest thing about this film) Success here is absolutely quantifiable and that is why this movie is an unquestionable hit. I may not like the way it meanders towards an ending we all see coming from the moment this film begins but the kids will enjoy it for what it is while I see it for exactly what it is.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress