FRED Entertainment

January 20, 2010

Toy Box: Cover Girls of the DCU – Zatanna

Filed under: Toy Box — Tags: , , , , — admin @ 3:59 am

toybox.jpg

Back at the 2009 San Diego Comic Con, one of my favorite new series from DC Direct was the set of statues called Cover Girls of the DCU. At the time, they were showing off Wonder Woman, Black Canary, Catwoman, Power Girl and Zatanna, and all looked exceptional in the approximately 9″ tall scale. I knew it was a series I’d be picking up.

And then a strange thing happened. Some how I lost track of them all together, and it wasn’t until late in 2009 when Black Canary was released that I realized I was already two statues behind. Both Wonder Woman and Zatanna had already come and gone, and I had to catch up.

Thankfully, both Wonder Woman and Zatanna were going to see a second shipment from DC Direct at the end of 2009 or early 2010. I received Wonder Woman a couple weeks ago (with Catwoman), and now Zatanna has hit my porch, making me feel all warm and fuzzy once again.

These collectibles are the combined efforts of the talented artist Adam Hughes, who designs the statues, and Jack Mathews who brings them to life in all their three dimensional glory. Each is a ‘limited’ edition, although with numbers like 5000 (the edition size on Zatanna) I think they’re pushing the concept of limited a tad.

If you have any questions or comments, drop me a line at mwctoys@mwctoys.com, or head over to my site at Michael’s Review of the Week, Captain Toy for tons more collectibles reviews.

Cover Girls of the DCU – Zatanna statue

toybox_011910_1

DC Direct is already in for several more statues, with some other strong rumors as well. Power Girl is up next and shipping very soon, and Harley right on her high heels. We’ve seen artwork for Poison Ivy, and both Batgirl and Supergirl are pretty much a given. After that, there’s still somewhere in the neighborhood of 352 more excellent choices for female DC characters, and while the line originally used actual covers for the designs, they’ve now said that Adam will be doing some of his own designs for the series as well, opening up the potential list even further. Bring on the ladies!

Packagiing – ***
These come in boxes, just big enough to keep the precious cargo safe and sound. Inside, the statue is packed in a solid styrofoam insert, and DC Direct has included a large Certificate of Authenticity. As I said, the run is 5000 on this particular statue, although I’m not quite sure how that worked with the two shipments. Did they always have a run size of 5000, and they just didn’t ship the second half right away? I suspect that’s the case, but I haven’t confirmed.

toybox_011910_2

Sculpt – ***1/2
DCD has hit on a winning team with Hughes and Mathews. Jack has the talent to translate Adam’s designs properly, with perfect proportions, scale and style.

While these statues are generally smooth surfaced, with little texture or fine detail, there is enough to give them some level of realism and take them just a notch about a straight comic book style interpretation.

toybox_011910_3

My only complaint with Zatanna is a complaint I’m likely to have with the entire series, since it’s clearly an aesthetic decision and not one of skill or quality – the hair lacks a lot of fine definition and detail. It’s less of an issue here on Zatanna than Wonder Woman, where the hair was done up in dynamic action pose, but it’s still annoying to me. I suspect I’ll end up favoring characters like Harley and Catwoman overall, where the hair is covered by a cowl, largely because of this issue.

Paint – ****
DC Direct has brought it when it comes to the paint quality on this series. I did have one statue – Black Canary – with some sloppy work on the eyes and lips, but that appears to be the exception, not the rule. The other three, Zatanna included, have had exceptional paint ops for this price range and this scale.

toybox_011910_6

Cut lines are generally sharp and clean, skin tones are smooth and consistent, and small details are well done. They’ve added some variety by employing different finishes, and the overall final effect is one of a high quality statue.

Design – ****
Each of these, whether it’s based on a comic cover or it is one of the future Hughes designs, is intended to be quite dynamic. They’re shooting for a lot of personality here, which is always a big risk. It can pay off huge when done well, but crash and burn if the execution is poor.

toybox_011910_4

So far the only design that’s questionable for me is Black Canary. For other folks, Wonder Woman was iffy. But I think Zatanna has universal appeal, with a very sexy, sleek dancer’s stance and coy expression. Like Catwoman, every aspect of the pose, from the tilt of the head to the angle of the hips, brings out her best qualities. There are times when Hughes’ ladies are a bit, uh, disproportionate, and yes, a bit sexist in their portrayal. But there’s simply no denying that they are always a) actual women, not little girls and b) hotter than asphalt in Texas on the Fourth of July.

toybox_011910_5

Value – ***
Yep, even at around $80, I’m giving these ladies an above average value score. Considering that the much smaller (around 30% smaller) Batman Black and White statues are already pushing $70, and considering the level of production quality on most of the releases so far especially with regard to the paint ops, the price tag is more than reasonable.

Things to Watch Out For – Nada. As long as you refrain from juggling her over a concrete floor, you should be fine.

toybox_011910_7

Overall – ****
I still like the Catwoman the best of the four releases so far, but that might be due to my affinity towards Batman villains, especially those wearing uber tight all black costumes. Zatanna is certainly right up there with her though, and these two are unlikely to be unseated by Power Girl, at least for me. Harley on the other hand…

Scoring Recap –
Packaging – ***
Sculpt – ***1/2
Paint – ****
Design – ****
Value – **1/2
Overall – ****

Where to Buy –
You have a number of online options if your LCS doesn’t carry these:

Alter Ego Comics has Zatanna in stock for $85, with pre-orders for the next two at the same price.

Urban Collector is out of Zatanna, but has the next two on pre-order for around $75 each.

Big Bad Toy Store has all the ladies listed as pre-order for $85.

Mike’s Comics N Stuff has most of the ladies for around $90.

– or you can hunt ebay for a deal!

Related Links –
I’m now finally caught up with the series, and have reviewed Wonder Woman, Catwoman, and Black Canary.

Bagged & Boarded 45: Someone Finally Got A Modem

Filed under: Bagged & Boarded — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 3:59 am

baggedboardedheader.jpg

What happens when two young men let their love of movies, comic books, and all things “geek” take over their lives? They run away from their families, bringing only the most essential DVDs and comics to their secret, highly fortified underground bunker in sunny Southern California, where they start recording podcasts that will change the world.

Are they heroes?

No.

Are they geniuses?

Far from it.

Are they the future of this planet?

I sure hope not.

Simply put… Matt Cohen and Jesse Rivers are “Bagged and Boarded”.

linesm.gif

BAGGED & BOARDED #45: Someone Finally Got A Modem – In which Matt and Jesse – That’s right, Jesse’s back! – are triumphantly reunited, and the gents discuss the current state of comic books, the Golden Globes, and their top 20 films of the decade! It’s the one you’ve been saving yourself for…

[CONTENT WARNING]: This podcast may contain some foul language and horribly off-color jokes. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
Episode #45 (MP3 format)

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/baggedboarded/bagged_boarded-45.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

Got something to say? E-mail Matt & Jesse at the B & B mailbag.

line.gif

CLICK HERE FOR THE BAGGED & BOARDED ARCHIVES

line.gif

##

Party Favors: Walk Like A Man

Filed under: Joe Corey's Party Favors — Tags: , , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 3:03 am

partyfavors1.jpg

DES MOINES – During the 20th Century when a young boy or girl wanted to know how to be an adult, they’d learn from the movies. This education was not from merely emulating the stars in Hollywood films. There were thousands of movies made for the classrooms that covered nearly every subject a young mind needed to absorb. And thousands of those 16mm films found their way into Skip Elsheimer’s A/V Geeks educational film center.

Skip tours the country giving presentations of the films in various theaters, museums, art galleries and occasionally a classroom. He’s sharing another batch of gems in two new DVD sets from Kino. How to Be a Woman and How to Be a Man are instructional, inspirational and horrific. Strange to see what professionals thought was great advice. Here’s a little sampler from How to Be a Woman:

Here’s an overview of How to be a Man:

The footage of Skip at the AV Geeks archive was shot by me. It must also be revealed that Skip once lived in my closet. It was a really big closet. This was supposed to be an interview with Skip, but he had to go under the knife for surgery. We wish him a speedy recovery. Ironically he’s scheduled to screen various medical films at the Moore College of Art & Design in Philadelphia on January 23. Are you ready to see “Cell Wars” in the land of Parking Wars?

The two sets received a major plug on CBS’s Sunday Morning that led to sell outs at Amazon. Both DVDs are back in stock. If you want to find out what various health films Skip has in the collection or tour dates, visit www.avgeeks.com.

UNDERCOVER BLAHS

Is CBS serious about airing Undercover Boss after the Super Bowl? The show looks about as interesting as watching a marathon of corporate inspirational videos. As if any of these bosses are going to show themselves as dispassionate boobs who spend more time on the phone with their brokers finding out when they can dump their stock options.

I Get That a Lot is a Candid Camera segment that’s flatlined. As if anyone isn’t going to guess Gene Simmons or Paris Hilton is really working a minimum wage jog. What would be more interesting is getting Hollywood’s hard working supporting actors who appear in every film, but you don’t know their names. Where’s Jane Lynch, Stephen Tobolowsky or Glenn Plummer? Actors who people will wonder if they saw them in films or their college yearbook. That is comedy.

The show I’m looking forward to is Fox’s Baptism of the Stars Thrill to the sight of Hollywood Heathens getting wet for Jesus. It’s going to be their big Easter special.

EXTREME LEFTOVERS

Can you imagine how bad it would be in the ’70s if you were at a party with James Caan, Warren Beatty and Wilt Chamberlain? What are the odds of you getting close to a woman’s phone number let alone her hotel room keys? If you saw their cars parked outside a nightclub, go home. You’d have better odds scoring at a convent. This trio slept with enough women to fill a World Cup stadium.

Rumors now swirl that Rip Torn once had a threesome with Mrs. Butterworth and Aunt Jemima.

DA PLANE

For all the Retro TV action that’s taking place as either digital sub channels or on regular broadcast in certain places like Chicago, there’s a piece of programming missing. Does any channel in America have a Saturday night line up that includes The Love Boat and Fantasy Island? If you want to create a nostalgia night, why not give us Captain Stubbing and Mr. Rourke with a cast of 100s of stars as their guests? These were the ABC crown jewels with Ernie Anderson’s iconic voice warning us that if you didn’t have a social life, you could take a staycation with a cheap cruise and a tourist trap.

For those of you who want to semi-recreate the night, you can get the first season of Fantasy Island and the first two seasons of The Love Boat on DVD. But it’d be sweeter if a plucky programming could reunite these cheesterpieces of the ’70s and ’80s on the night they mattered.

REVISIT THIS BAND

As part of desire to plan ahead, my new year’s resolution for 2011 is to make the J. Geils Band cool once more. And I’m not talking about the “Freeze Frame” and “Centerfold” era band that dominated MTV for a couple weeks. I’m talking about the band that wailed on “Whammer Jammer.” Peter Wolf is the type of vocal dynamo you don’t get anymore. He’s not merely singing. He’s calling in urgent air strikes on his baby’s heart. This is the type of music that shouldn’t be listened to in a smoke-free bar. Dig up the live stuff to get that shot of distilled mayhem.

MORE FOOD

Why do all these competition cooking shows send their chefs to Whole Foods with a $100 to buy all their groceries? Imagine how much more food they could buy a normal supermarket or even a farmer’s market with the same amount of cash. You can’t get a decent chicken thigh for less than $10 there.

BLACK BELT FESTIVAL

Jim Kelly is finally getting his due with Urban Action Collection. Three of his better films are on this low budget set with Black Belt Jones, Three the Hard Way and Hot Potato. You should know Kelly from his ass kicking turn in Enter the Dragon where he held his own with Bruce Lee and John Saxon. This trio contains more of his inner city karate skills. Three the Hard Way is a classic with Kelly teaming up with Jim Brown and Fred Williamson. The fourth film is Black Samson. I recently caught the trailer and it’s just strange. Rockne Tarkington roams the ghetto with a giant club and a full grown lion. Here’s a strange piece of trivia: Rockne was the only black actor to speak on The Andy Griffith Show. If you have a little left on your gift cards, enjoy those Badass Cinema classics of the ’70s if you have a little left on your gift cards. You might want to also pick up a bottle of Colt 45 Malt Liquor to properly appreciate the thespian greatness of Kelly and Tarkington.

It’s a perfect appetizer while waiting for Black Dynamite.

WORLD’S WORST DAD

DVD SHELF

Mel Brooks’ Spaceballs: The Totally Warped Animated Adventures attempts to revive the 22 year old Star Wars spoof as an Adult Swim-esque cartoon. They were smart enough to get Mel Brooks, Joan Rivers and Daphne Zuniga to voice their characters. Unfortunately RIck Moranis isn’t Darth Helmet. Instead were given Dee Bradley Baker with a rather forgettable tone. While they supposedly made 13 episodes, only 4 are included on the DVD. Fans of the movie will get a laugh or two from the continuing spoofs of science fiction films. However the series doesn’t go beyond the humor of the movie. Mel Brooks supposedly over saw the cartoons, but it seems he’s more concerned about Broadway adaptations of his old movies. There’s just little things missing from Spaceballs that makes it a pale impersonation of the original film instead of taking the characters to an animated galaxy.

The Marine 2 stars Ted DiBiase Jr. instead of John Cena as the elite marine who bumps into trouble on his vacation. This time the WWE wrestler gets taken to a Thailand resort with his woman for the grand opening. Turns out a few of the locals aren’t liking the place. They attack the resort and take the VIP guests hostage. It’s up to DiBiase to take kick a little ass to get back his woman and lay down the international law. The biggest star in the film is Michael Rooker (Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer). He’s not even the villain which is good for DiBiase. Rooker is out of his league when given an evil role. DiBiase does play it a little more convincing than Cena in this sequel. It does help that the action is focused around the resort. The takeover scene is plays well with numerous explosions and an attack force wearing tribal masks while unloading automatic weapons. The bonus features include extended and deleted scenes with Muay Thai Fighting. Crack open a beer and enjoy the beatdowns courtesy of the son of the Million Dollar Man. You can also get it in Blu-ray to see a more vivid tropical terror.

Make It Or Break It: Volume One, Extended Edition takes us inside the highly competitive world of female gymnastics. The pressure is on for these girls who have only a few years to achieve Olympic glory. The 10 episodes on the boxset introduce us to the hopefuls at the Rocky Mountain Gym. They call it “The Rock.” There’s a lot of politics to go along with the floor routines. A new Russian coach arrives with visions of making it big for his little trainees. This show is properly aimed at kids who like to watch gymnastics, but fear being flung through the air and tearing apart their knees. It allows people to realize there’s tons of hardwork and backstabbing before you can get on the balance beam.

10 Things I Hate About You: Volume One adapts the teenage cinematic adaptation of Shakespeare’s Taming of the Shrew into a weekly series. Larry Miller returns in the role of Dr. Walter Stratford, but nobody else from the film steps down to the small screen. There’s a new Kat (Lindsey Shaw) and Bianca (Meaghan Jette Martin) giving strife to Patrick (Ethan Peck) and Cameron (Nicholas Braun). The series is aimed for the kids who think high school is the key to romance. Each week Bianca attempts to become part of the popular kids at school. This is followed up with another reason why Kat has to turn everything complicated. The show is a single camera 30 minute sitcom so things don’t get bogged down too long. This is a sitcom for the tween that wants more from the Heath Ledger movie.

The Boys Are Back is Clive Owen (Children of Men) in a bit a weeper. He’s a sportswriter who loses his wife to cancer. He now has to deal with raising their young son and his teenage son from an earlier marriage. He’s got to find time between his work to care for the boys. It’s bit of a male version of a Lifetime film. Scott Hicks who directed Shine gives the tale an arthouse polish that elevates the material above a made for TV movie. If they remade this in America, Clive Owen would be begging for a slot on ESPN’s Around the Horn. It is refreshing to see a dad-centric film. Owen’s face shows the burden of his new life as single dad.

Surrogates is about people who control androids so they no longer have to leave their houses. It’s kinda like Avatar without blue people, Roger Dean album cover landscapes and that pesky anti-American message brought to you by News Corp. Bruce Willis is the last human willing to roam society. He’s an FBI agent investigating the murder of a student linked to the creator of the robo-clones. Action director Jonathan Mostow and his crew keep the action tight and barely over 80 minutes. The film represents the rebirth of Jack Noseworthy. It’s a good entry for your Bruce Willis Buttkicking Marathon 2010. Bonus features include a commentary track from Mostow.

I Heart Jonas brings together seven episodes of the series as a Valentine’s Day gift. Although this year, there will only be hearting done to Joe and Nick Jonas since Kevin is now married. The show does its hardest to make the three brothers act like the Monkees of the 21st century. The slow paced editing cuts down on the chaos and insanity that made the Monkees an iconic musical comedy. Also doesn’t help that the brothers aren’t secretly rebelling against their cute pop star image. They seem content being pure pop for a teen audience. They won’t be sneaking Frank Zappa onto the set. The highlight of this batch is “You’ve Just Been Jo Bro’d” with American Idol winner Jordin Sparks. Remember when she defended their promise rings against the foul mouth Russell Brand.

thirtysomething: The Complete Second Season brings us the rise of Miles! Is he the savior to Michael and Elliot or their doom? This was a strike shortened season so there’s only 17 episodes. My favorite part is all that cutting edge ’80s technology and shoulder pads. Here’s a teaser for the show.

The Keeper takes Steven Seagal out of his reality show and punches him back into the world of cinematic whoopass. He’s an ex-cop that was screwed over by his devious partner. He grabs a gig as a bodyguard to a rich guy’s daughter. However his bad luck streak continues when the gal gets kidnapped by mobsters. Seagal refuses to take a third strike on his record. He must track her down and bring the pain on those that would sully his reputation. It’s a modest production on scale with a Walker, Texas Ranger. Although they overload the explosives in Seagal’s gaze. There’s no bonus features. I wanted my Seagal audio commentary, but I guess he wants to keep the secrets of his industrial strength hairdo. It’s big non-thinking action fun from the TV cop.

January 19, 2010

Soapbox: Golden Globes, Ricky Gervais, AVATAR, & A Few Other Buzzwords

Filed under: Articles — Tags: , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 7:20 am

soapbox-header.png

Golden Globes, Ricky Gervais, AVATAR, & A Few Other Buzzwords

lucyline.gif

depGolden Globes night. I had just cracked open a cold bottle of Paulaner Hefe-Weizen, while recalling my grandfather’s now-legendary words of wisdom: “Just remember, you can’t drink it all – they’ll always make more.”

Even now, years later, I see no reason to attempt to prove him wrong.

I was primed for this awards ceremony, having seen Ricky Gervais several days prior on The Tonight Show with Conan O’Brien, where the subject of his hosting the Globes was discussed briefly. More importantly, Gervais made it quite clear in his comments to Conan whose side he was on, and he doesn’t strike me as one to pull any punches. Gervais + Pro-Conan Stance + Hosting an awards show on NBC = a recipe for some potentially (unintentionally?) hilarious disaster.

I was in no way disappointed. Gervais made some comments that made me squirm in my seat and laugh nervously, repeatedly finding a welcome distraction in my wheaty beer (I would drink three bottles before the show finally ended). A small sampling of what I mean:

– In his opening bit, Gervais expressed his concern that NBC might suddenly replace him as the host of the awards, and put Leno in his place (adding at one point, “I’m not used to these sort of viewing figures … neither is NBC, for that matter”). This didn’t get unanimous laughter from the star-studded audience. Ricky, Ricky, Ricky… this is a Hollywood audience. Leno’s been around since before Jim Carrey was doing In Living Color, for cripe’s sake – he’s gotta have more than a few friends in this audience. Nervous laughter.

– The original creative power behind The Office, Gervais complained to the audience that everyone thinks Steve Carrell is the brilliant one, as evidenced by the fact that he gets all the movie deals. He referred to the American version of the show as having “jumped the shark” (literally, “Arthur Fonzarellied”), and promoted the British version of the show on DVD. More nervous laughter.

– Gervais spoke of having flown over on the same flight as Sir Paul McCartney (who was nominated for Best Original Song from a Motion Picture), noting that McCartney flew coach because he was “saving money… he spent an awful lot last year.” Jokes about divorce are rarely funny to the person who just experienced one. Still more nervous laughter.

– Before introducing Mel Gibson, Gervais walked on-stage with a beer, admitted to having “had a few”, then delivered the blow: “I like a drink as much as the next man… unless the next man is Mel Gibson.” Then he left the beer on the podium, thus setting up one of the night’s funnier moments, which came, not from the show itself, but from the Twitter stream: Ken Plume (@KenPlume) quipped, “Ricky even left the drink out for Mel. Now THAT’S a good host.”

Which brings me to my next point: I watched this entire event with my Twitter stream flowing, washing gently over me and keeping me informed, in 140-character quips, about what other people wanted to say about the show. It was like watching the whole thing with a room full of friends, who for some reason would only speak in short sentences, and only all at the same time. Oh well. At least I didn’t have to share my beer with them.

The whole live-tweet experience probably colored my perception of the awards show. There were a few genuinely funny moments in the show itself (see McCartney’s quip, “Animation is not just for children, it is also for a-dults who take drugs”), but most of the laughs that came from me, specifically (as opposed to “you”), were prompted by comments from the tweeple I follow. When Mickey Rourke walked on-stage in a too-large-to-be-taken-seriously cowboy hat, Ricky Gervais refused to poke fun at him (“mainly because he has arms as big as my legs”, he explained). Thankfully, Caissie St. Onge (@Caissie) was there to jab, “I love that Mickey Rourke declined to do banter of any kind. You’re not going to get wittier than that hat”, while Tim Siedell (@badbanana) noted, “Not sure Mickey Rourke knows someone put a hat on him as a joke.”

These were the golden moments of the Golden Globes. It gave me a great idea for future ceremonies: live-streaming Twitter feeds, running constantly on a jumbo-tron in the background. Wouldn’t that be awesome? We could sit in the comfort (read: safety) of our own homes and launch our stream-of-consciousness thoughts directly into the audience. I’m betting that would change a few things about the environment and atmosphere of those shows. Granted, Ashton Kutcher (@aplusk) might have to stop tweeting during those events, but I consider that a net win, really.

It also made me wonder: in what other scenarios might this live-tweeting medium prove to be a major enhancement to the event currently being experienced? Sporting events? Movie premiers? Book readings at the local Tea Society? Papal Vespers?

I don’t know. But I think I’m close to discovering something big here. I’ll let you know when I figure out what it is.

(A quick BTW/PS: I know, this post was about the Golden Globes, and I didn’t say anything about which movies won which awards. It doesn’t really matter. Same amount of shockers, upsets, disappointments, complaints, victories, no-kiddings, and they-deserved-its as last year.)

Jacob Michael

Comics in Context #229: Outfoxed

Filed under: Comics in Context — Tags: , , , , , — admin @ 5:02 am

comicsincontext4.jpg

#229 (Vol. 2 #1): OUTFOXED

depAs far back in my life as I can remember, I was reading comics. Of course my tastes have evolved over the course of my life, but sometimes I wonder, what would I think today of the comics I loved when I was in early grade school or even kindergarten?

The new collection, The Toon Treasury of Classic Children’s Comics, selected and edited by Art Spiegelman and Francoise Mouly, and published by Harry N. Abrams’ ComicArts imprint, provides me with an opportunity to find out. It is a superb anthology of stories aimed at small children from comic books published in the period from the 1940s into the mid-1960s, including comics that Baby Boomers like myself grew up with. I intend to devote a number of “Comics in Context” columns to the work of various comics creators that appear in this book.

The first stories I turned to in this collection starred were from a series that was one of my earliest favorites: The Fox and the Crow. These constant antagonists had a long run in comics, from 1945 to 1968, first in Real Screen Comics and then in their own title. The Fox and the Crow comic was probably the first DC Comic I ever read, long before I had any interest in super heroes. Back then there were rarely any credits on comic books, so I had no idea until reading Classic Children’s Comics that the principal artist on the handsomely drawn Fox and the Crow comics was named Jim Davis, who is not to be confused with the Jim Davis who created the comic strip cat Garfield.

But as a child I had no idea that not only did DC not own the Fox and the Crow, but that they had originated in animated cartoons. In the 1980s I finally saw the Fox and the Crow in The Magic Fluke (1949), a UPA cartoon directed by John Hubley, in which the Crow inadvertently gives the Fox, a conductor, a magic wand instead of a baton, leading to chaos; it appears to be the inspiration for a far greater cartoon, Tex Avery’s Magical Maestro (1952). But in The Magic Fluke, the Fox and Crow did not seem much like the versions I recalled from the comics.

It was not until a few years ago that I finally saw the first Fox and Crow cartoon, The Fox and the Grapes (1941), a theatrical cartoon directed by Frank Tashlin for Columbia:

As the title suggests, it was inspired by one of Aesop’s fables, which had been sources for cartoons at Disney and other studios, notably at Terrytoons, since the silent era. Tashlin had worked on Warner Brothers animated cartoons at various points in the 1930s and the World War II years, becoming a director. In 1941 he briefly left Warners for Columbia’s animation department. He even hired Mel Blanc, creator of so many voices for Warners cartoon characters, to create the voices for the Fox and the Crow. Eventually, Tashlin became a live action film director, working on comedies starring Bob Hope and Jerry Lewis, among others, which sometimes seem like live action cartoons in staging gags.

depThere is no crow in Aesop’s “The Fox and the Grapes,” which recounts a fox’s vain efforts to get hold of grapes high on a tree. (Spoiler warning: as usual I will discuss stories, including their endings, in detail.) Tashlin introduced the Crow, who tries to steal food from the Fox’s picnic spread. The Fox angrily retaliates by giving the Crow a hotfoot. The Crow then finds the fable of the Fox and the Grapes in a book and decides to restage it. He hangs a bunch of grapes on a tree branch high above the ground, and offers to trade them for some of the Fox’s picnic food. Though immediately obsessed with the grapes, the Fox refuses. So the Crow then watches placidly as the Fox makes repeated and ever more elaborate attempts to reach them, all of which backfire on him. Chuck Jones is said to have cited Tashlin’s The Fox and the Grapes as an influence on his Roadrunner-Coyote series.

The Fox and the Crow as portrayed in this cartoon were closer to the versions I recalled from the comics, though I remembered their conflicts as more personal and verbal. Tashlin only directed this first Fox and Crow cartoon before returning to Warners, but Columbia made a whole series, mostly directed by Bob Wickersham. Mel Blanc did not continue performing the Fox and Crow, but the voices he gave them were imitated in subsequent cartoons. Wickersham’s Woodman, Spare That Tree (1942) isn’t as good as Tashlin’s cartoon, but the Fox goes to even greater extremes, using an elephant and a train to try to knock down the Crow’s tree:

By Mr. Moocher (1944) the Fox lives in a handsome suburban house, and the Crow is his lower class next door neighbor, living in a shack:

This brings the characters close to the setting in the comics, in which the Fox’s house is next door to the Crow’s tree from the first cartoon. (UPA produced the last three Fox and Crow cartoons before Columbia ended the series.)

I was startled to see the Fox make his entrance in the Tashlin cartoon, prancing, skipping and singing along through the woods, acting as if he might have been meant to be a coded gay stereotype. In the comics the only traces of this seem to be the Fox’s first name, Fauntleroy, and possibly elements of his costume, like his big, floppy bow tie. I certainly didn’t see the implications when I read the comics as a child, and I doubt if many other readers my age did, either.

As for the Crow, in the comics his first name was Crawford, he wore a derby and smoked cigars, and spoke with a “dese” and “dose” dialect. As a child I had no idea at the time that crows could represent African-Americans in cartoons. One of the best known examples are the crows in Disney’s Dumbo (1941). Similarly, when I was a child, my favorite character in the Famous Studios (later Harvey) animated cartoons was Buzzy the Crow. Not until I saw some Buzzy cartoons recently did I realize that actor Jackson Beck (the longtime voice of Bluto in the Famous Studios Popeye cartoons), was attempting to give Buzzy a black Southern accent.

The crows in Dumbo remain controversial for being caricatured black stereotypes, but I suspect they were intended by the Disney studio as positive characters. Dumbo, the baby elephant with the enormous ears, is a misfit in the circus community. The crows also initially mock Dumbo, but after Dumbo’s friend Timothy the mouse explains how Dumbo has suffered, the crows become the elephant’s friends and supporters. In short, Dumbo has become an outcast from what is, for him, mainstream society, and is instead embraced by the alternative, more tolerant community of the crows, who are themselves outsiders.

As for Buzzy, he strikes me as being a surprisingly positive “black” character, considering his cartoons were made over a half century ago. He is a brilliant trickster figure, like a Bugs Bunny or Woody Woodpecker, who continually outsmarts his nemesis Katnip the cat, who sounds like a dumb white guy. See, for example, their tussle in Cat-Choo (1951):

Was Tashlin’s Crow–and the version in the comics–also meant to be a coded African-American? Probably not: in Tashlin’s original cartoon Mel Blanc gives the Crow what might be a lower class New York accent, maybe from Brooklyn, which the comics render by having the Crow say things like “dese” and “dose.” In one of the stories in this collection, the Crow exclaims, “What a revoltin’ development this is!”, a catchphrase used by William Bendix as the blue-collar white protagonist of the radio series The Life of Riley, and later appropriated by the Fantastic Four’s Ben Grimm.

So the clashes between the Fox and Crow have a subtext of class warfare. In the comics the Fox is an effete, prosperous bourgeois, perhaps WASP-ish, living in a nice house with a refrigerator well stocked with food; the Crow is his neighbor, who is clearly not prosperous and lives in a tree with various holes in the trunk that serve as a window and door, and seems of uncertain ethnicity. The Crow is continually attempting to con the Fox out of food or money, and, although Don Markstein’s Toonopedia advises that the Fox can be triumphant, it would appear from the evidence in Classic Children’s Comics that the Crow is more often than not the victor.

Classic Children’s Comics starts out its “Fox and the Crow” section with three short gag strips, two of which consist of only a half page each. These establish the basic pattern, in which the Crow cleverly outfoxes the Fox, who can be formidable in his anger. But though a fox is a more typical trickster figure in stories, Fauntleroy can’t quite keep up with Crawford Crow. For instance, in one of these short strips, the Fox discovers the Crow has gotten into his refrigerator and threatens to lock him inside. But the Crow is a step ahead of him and has bought an “Eskimo suit” and so will be perfectly comfortable staying inside the refrigerator indefinitely.

These three short strips set up the collection’s eight-page-long story “The Great Chiseler” from Real Screen Comics #42 (1951), which is a little masterpiece, surprising in its sophistication. The Crow starts out by soliloquizing about his own brilliance, saying “If dey gave da Nobel Prize for bein’ a great chiseler, I’d win every year!” This is hubris, as we soon see.

The Crow tries to con the Fox by asserting the Fox owes him money for breathing his air. While the Fox loses his temper over this, the Crow remains cool and calm. This is a pattern you should recognize from Bugs Bunny cartoons: Bugs keeps his cool and thus easily manipulates adversaries like Daffy Duck or Yosemite Sam, who are blinded by their own emotions. In this instance the Crow points out the fact that the wind carries air from his tree over to the Fox’s house, and then demands that the Fox pay up or stop breathing. The Fox’s panic at the idea that his air supply will be cut off keeps him from punching a hole in the Crow’s logic. The Fox looks literally dazed, and it looks as if he is about to pay the Crow for his air.

But tales of tricksters often work better when the trickster’s target can be clever as well. The Fox suddenly has a brainstorm, heads into his house, and reemerges holding what the Crow identifies as “an issue a da comic youse an’ me are in.” The Fox angrily says that the Crow pulled the same trick on him in this issue, and he won’t fall for it again.

And thus this kiddie comic has abruptly shifted into what we would now call metafiction. The Fox and the Crow are aware that they are characters in comic book stories, although neither seems at all perturbed by the notion. Whatever they do will appear in a comic book, and they know it. This even echoes Tashlin’s original cartoon, in which the Crow reads about the fable of the Fox and the Grapes and then decides to stage his own version. In Woodman not only does the Crow consult an “encycrowpedia” for ideas, but the book comments on what happens in the cartoon.

Moreover, when the Crow heads off to prepare another trick, he runs into the Fox, holding a towering stack of comic books. “I have every issue of Real Screen Comics,” the Fox tells him, so he has reference on every trick the Crow has ever pulled on him. “The Great Chiseler” was first published in 1951. Can this be one of the first references in comics to comic book collecting, or to keeping track of comic book continuity?

depNow the Crow, who usually keeps his cool and control of the situation, becomes flustered and angry. On page 1 he was complimenting himself on how quickly and easily he comes up with new ideas; now he realizes that he has just been recycling old ones. The Crow is suffering from something similar to writer’s block: after all, his schemes are what usually drive the comics stories he and the Fox appear in. He quickly concocts a new trick, and it nearly works, but the Fox sees through it. Now the Crow worries that he is in effect over the hill in his chosen profession of con artist: “If I fail now, I’m t’rough! Washed up! Finished!” He’s like a creative figure going through a midlife crisis.

Finally, the Crow has the Fox calculate how much he has cheated him out of on various occasions, and then announces that since “me chiselin’ career is over,” he is moving away. The Fox realizes that if the Crow leaves, he will never be able to get any of his money back from him. The Fox goes into hysterics while the Crow remains calm and cool: they are back to their usual relationship. The Fox then offers the Crow more money to get him to stay. To put it in contemporary economic terms, it seems that the Crow owes the Fox so much money that he’s become “too big to fail” and has to be bailed out!

The Crow, ah, crows in triumph, not so much over getting ten bucks from the Fox, but from successfully devising a brand new trick, thereby proving his creativity is still at its peak. The Fox balances the scales somewhat by beating the Crow up between panels, but the Crow is still triumphant. Notice that he even uses a metaphor characterizing himself as an author to describe his victory: “I added another great chapter in da history of chiselin’!”

The 1950s are infamous in comics history for the charges that comic books influenced juvenile delinquency by supposedly promoting violence and immorality. I expect that The Fox and the Crow flew under the radar of the censors of that time. But here are stories in which the Crow continually tricks the Fox out of food and money, and gets away with it. But that doesn’t bother me: through his arrogant anger and his refusal to share, the Fox seems to deserve to be conned by the Crow. The stories are based on the surefire appeal of seeing the little guy who doesn’t have much outsmart the smugly self-satisfied big guy who has more than he needs. The appeal that the Fox and the Crow had for kids is clear: the Crow is the kids’ surrogate, using his wits to get the better of the taller–read “adult”–Fox on whom he is dependent.

When I was a small child, I thought that The Fox and the Crow was one of the best comics I read, and it’s a pleasure, reading the Fox and Crow stories in Classic Children’s Comics, to discover that they really were as clever, as well constricted, and as handsomely drawn as I thought they were in my childhood. Not only that, but I see that they had a level of sophistication that makes them appeal to me as an adult, as well. In this and some of the other impressive comics in this collection, I get the feeling that the creators felt they had great creative freedom because no one was really paying attention to little kids’ comics at the time–except the kids themselves. It’s rewarding to discover that my taste in comics from early childhood was so good!

Copyright 2010 Peter Sanderson

Soapbox: FourthMeal, FifthMeal, SixthMeal

Filed under: Articles — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 3:58 am

soapbox-header.png

FourthMeal, FifthMeal, SixthMeal…

lucyline.gif

depI suppose it’s a sad enough commentary on the state of our current culture that, as I prepare to begin this article by stating that I was recently out for a “FourthMeal” run, I realize there is absolutely no need to explain exactly what “FourthMeal” is. Congratulations, Taco Bell – all of those billions of dollars spent on that ridiculous advertising campaign were dollars well-spent; your nasty little slogan is now part of our common vocabulary.

I also wanted to say this: I think the “FourthMeal” branding is incredibly presumptuous. I resent the fact that Taco Bell assumes they know me well enough to make the statement, stamped with a registered trademark no less, that this is my fourth meal of the day. It might only be my third meal of the day, which would explain why I’m running out for fast food at 11:45 PM. Maybe I skipped dinner, and that’s why I’m so desperately hungry that I will actually drive to the nearest Taco Bell and actually order, pay for, and eat their pseudo-Mexi-slop. For that matter, maybe this is my ninth meal of the day. Perhaps I’m shooting for a personal record.

I am somewhat shocked that, these days, nearly every single item available for purchase at Taco Bell comes with a taco on the side. You want a quesadilla combo? That comes with a taco. You want a cheesy bean burrito combo? That, too, comes with a taco. You want a family-size combo-pack of 15 tacos? Here, have a taco with that.

When the time comes for the helpful sales associate to process your order, they are required by Federal Law to ask you, “Would you like a hard or soft taco with that?” This is where I get a bit antsy, as a consumer. I’ve already sat in line at the drive-thru and fearfully, anxiously weighed my menu options for a solid 15 minutes – not because I wanted to wait that long, but because that’s how long it took for this well-oiled, “fast”-food machine to process the order of the guy in front of me. By this point in the chronology of events, I’ve already come to several food-based crossroads, and I’ve moved on: I know which of the fifteen combo meals I want, I know which beverage (regular or diet) I would like to accompany that combo, I know whether I will go with steak, chicken, or beef in my “Supreme” (not “Baja”) Gordita (not Chalupa), I know what size I want, and I know which sauces I want on top of it all.

Do you really need to pressure with this “hard-or-soft-taco” decision now?!

Does it really even matter? We’re talking about the exact same internal contents in either case: some ground beef, a sprinkling of lettuce, a small ration of finely diced tomatoes, exactly seven cheese shavings, and a tiny plop of sour cream (yes, the standard Taco Bell unit of measure for sour cream is indeed the “plop” – look it up). The only difference between the hard or soft taco, then, is the flexibility of the wrapper around the taco-y center. Will it be brittle and dry, or will it be soft and moist? Either way, is it really going to drastically impact the overall enjoyment I will derive from the combo meal as a whole? I strongly doubt it. Do I intend to do anything with this edible taco wrapper that may or may not result in personal injury, based on its durability or texture? Perhaps, but not likely.

So I like to let the helpful sales associate choose for me. That’s one less thing they can screw up (although, I will not be terribly surprised if this one day happens to me). “Hard or soft taco?” “It’s your call, man.” I’m pretty easy going when it comes to my fast-food, precisely because it is just that: fast-food. This isn’t a formal outing, there are no culinary critics involved, and none of the menu items include fancy French sounds (such as words ending in -eaux, or words beginning with D’– or L’-). I didn’t put on a coat and tie for the occasion, nor did I bring a vintage bottle of cabinet reserve to accompany my “FourthMeal”.

On the contrary, I pre-resigned myself to ordering food from a place that actually spent marketing dollars on the concept of a late-night munchie-run. I fully expect the food-product that gets handed to me in a plastic bag through a tiny glass window by a minimum wage associate named “Chip” – food-product that is, I remind you, accompanied by paper-towel napkins and occasionally packaged in a cardboard box – to be heavy on functionality, and light on aesthetics. Put simply: I expect to cram this crap down my gullet in order to quiet the growl in my belly, not to experience taste-bud nirvana.

Which is why I will never understand those people who treat the drive-thru encounter as though it were akin to dining out at the Olive Garden. You know the type: the person who drives up to the little metal ordering-box and asks for the Big Hombre combo (all 38 pieces), grande-sizes the hell out of it, but then demands to have the tomatoes on the side, the sour cream swapped out for ranch dressing, nacho cheese instead of the pepper-jack, no “zowie” sauce, and two empty tortilla shells instead of the baggie of chips.

To this individual, I calmly say: please consider your %$!!@%$! surroundings and do a much-needed reality check. The franchise from which you are currently ordering your late-night sustenance has three large tubs in the back storage area, filled with ground meat-product, cheese-product, and some kind of damp “veggie” mix. The 74 menu items you see are simply a series of variations made up of ingredients drawn from these three tubs, rearranged in inventive ways for marketing purposes. You should consider yourself lucky that they don’t just dump the whole sloppy mess straight into the plastic bag, and hand it over to you with a spork and a friendly “good luck, Señor.”

Now… If you’ll pardon me, I need to go back to Taco Bell and complain. They put jalapeño sauce on my quesadilla and forgot to add fresh onions, again.

-Jacob Michael

Opinion In A Haystack: THE LOVELY BONES

haystackheader.jpg

green

Twitter Friendly Lovely Bones Reveiw:

It’s like Peter Jackson doing Terry Gilliam-Light. Stanley Tucci is amazing. Good night everybody!

Attention Span Friendly Lovely Bones Review:

Plot Synopsis from IMDB:

Based on the best selling book by Alice Sebold, The Lovely Bones is the story of a 14-year-old girl from suburban Pennsylvania who is murdered by her neighbor. She tells the story from Heaven, showing the lives of the people around her and how they have changed all while attempting to get someone to find her lost body.

********SPOILER FREE** SPOILER FREE** SPOILER FREE********

You watch a movie like Peter Jackson’s latest effort and wonder why we have the Hollywood system that we do. You think about that for about a second and you quietly remember: it’s 98% based on who is sexier. Duh. Silly to forget such concrete facts. Death. Taxes. Attractive people always win. Why is Mark Wahlberg more famous and prosperous than Stanley Tucci? No offense to Wahlberg, but other than saying hi to mothers vicariously through their offspring, a whispy voice and looking serious all the time, what does he have to offer in a world where acting behemoths like Tucci exist? It’s a rhetorical question, yet the answer is seemingly sex appeal. That could be wrong though, perhaps we haven’t seen Wahlberg’s full potential, but we have seen Tucci’s for decades now. Tucci can do drama, comedy, action, sci-fi, hero, villain, anything”¦just give the guy a script and he pours the premium-acting-serum down his gullet and blows you away. Once again I apologize for my bitter snark, but I’ve been a follower and fan of Mr. Tucci since Undercover Blues. It gets a touch annoying when the community starts praising an actor, who has been great for twenty years, like he came out of nowhere and it’s a surprise he is that damn good. His incredibly nuanced and Oscar worthy performance in The Lovely Bones is the least surprising cinematic pleasure I’ve witnessed so far in 2010.

16269_212164746284_115941171284_4488248_959914_n

Praise of Tucci aside, The Lovely Bones is an uneven delight. Having not read the book, it seems obvious to say that none of these assertions are based on accuracy to the source material. Peter Jackson channels his Heavenly Creatures mojo and adds a dash of Terry Gilliam’s aesthetic to the skeleton of the movie. The scenes featuring Saoirse Ronan’s Susie Salmon wafting through the “inbetween” of heaven and earth are easily the strongest elements of the whole film, and the scenes in which Jackson seems to be most comfortable. The director’s output for the last ten years has no doubt become household knowledge. Being a strong fan of his films, (especially his early work) it is a touch disappointing to see him come back from heavy fantasy worlds in order to prove to those that forgot, or didn’t know, his pre-Rings career had shown he can do other genres besides fantasy, only for him to deliver a movie where the fantasy scenes work so well and the scenes based in reality fall way off key. If anything The Lovely Bones will only serve to push him more into the pre-defined little fantasy treasure-chest that it should have broke him out of.

susie-in-heaven

Mark Wahlberg and Rachel Wiesz play the parents of Susie Salmon, and they feel like a huge presence in the narrative”¦for about 15 minutes. After Susie goes missing, murdered by Stanley Tucci’s disgusting George Harvey, the role of the parental units (Conehead speak!) seems to just dissipate off into the wind, so much so that I forgot about Wiesz’s character even being in the movie for a good chunk. Her comings and goings happen without much fanfare, much like the father’s obsession with finding the truth about his daughter’s disappearance. In fact, it seems we are suppose to be following the father’s heartbreak more than anyone’s, but suddenly Susie’s invisible-to-the-audience sister, played by Rose Mclver, comes to the forefront in the hunt for the killer and it gives off this very uneven feeling of who we are emotionally suppose to follow. Add in a wacky montage (wacky montage? Yes really) of Susan Sarandon’s hard drinking, smoking Grandmother trying to do house chores and take care of the kids while the parents mourn and you have one very disjointed feeling. First the movie is killing a kid, and then Susan Sarandon has a wacky “˜80s-style montage, with a side of more wacky. WACKY! There is also a semi-side-story involving a psychic girl who becomes this film’s “Whoopi Goldberg” which I won’t go into, but let me stress, it makes it even more unbalanced.

jack-and-susie-at-the-table

The one consistent character through out is Tucci’s George Harvey. The razor sharp performance coupled with the dimly lit scenes of the killer bombastically pounding, sawing, and thoughtfully planning out the murder of an innocent girl molds George Harvey into an archetypal villain worth noting. Susie narrates the events of her killer’s life, past and present, showing us the horrid crimes he’s committed and how much he craves them. If there is anything to be said about craftsmanship here it is the wonderful sound design and editing concerning George’s scenes. The sounds are sharp, full, and hit hard in contrast to the rest of the film’s soft audio texture. A small piece of praise, but a worthy one”¦someone’s got to give the sound guy’s their due!

stanley-tucci-as-george-harvey

It needs to be said that the uneven tone could possibly be due to the long span of time that the film’s narrative covers. In many ways the movie reminded me of David Fincher’s Zodiac, due to the long spans of time not shown and character progression that has to be sacrificed because of such. In all honesty The Lovely Bones might be getting a rather unfair assessment from me, it felt like one of those movies where repeat viewings help the flick to find its footing in your mind and sell you on it a ton more. Perhaps I’m just saying that because I’m a fan of Jackson, but all the flaws taken into account, the movie still has much to offer. Highly recommended for fans of Stanley Tucci and the concept of purgatory (the non-Catholic version.)

Thanks for reading!

January 18, 2010

TV Or Not TV: 1/18 – 1/24

Filed under: TV Or Not TV — Tags: — admin @ 5:32 am

tvornottv-header.png

MONDAY

NBC – 8:00 PM: Tonight, regardless of the real title, it’s CHUCK vs. JACK BAUER.

FOX – 8:00 PM: 24 has become so cliche that I’ll just link to this drinking game to make the show more enjoyable.

THE CW – 9:00 PM: Tonight in the series premiere of LIFE UNEXPECTED a 15 year old in the foster care system gets herself legally emancipated and tracks down her biological parents. It’s got a strong cast so this one shows some promise.

TUESDAY

FOX – 8:00 PM: SHANIA TWAIN fills the PAULA seat tonight as the auditions continue on AMERICAN IDOL.

NBC – 8:00 PM: Tonight on THE BIGGEST LOSER a contestant threatens to quit. How exactly do you make a threat for leaving a show that saves your life?

USA – 10:00 PM: After the mid-season finale of WHITE COLLAR‘s big cliff-hanger I’m sure a lot of people are looking forward to tonight’s premiere.

WEDNESDAY

FOX – 8:00 PM: Really I feel cheap and dirty mentioning AMERICAN IDOL twice but KRISTIN CHENOWITH is PAULA today.

ABC FAMILY – 8:00 PM: OK, I looked up and down the schedule. I’m just not in to much that’s on so I’ll probably watch PIXAR SHORT FILMS again.

THURSDAY

FOX – 8:00 PM: Two words can best describe why I’d recommend tonight’s episode of BONES: DIEDRICH BADER.

ABC – 8:00 PM: Great looking lawyers in a cut-throat law firm. ABC’s description is L.A. Law meets GREY’S ANATOMY. Great job refrencing a show over 15 years old guys. Way to keep it fresh.

USA – 10:00 PM: BURN NOTICE returns and now instead of finding out who burned him MICHAEL WESTON has to find out who might be out to kill him, all while eatting nothing but yogurt.

FRIDAY

FOX, ABC, NBC, CBS – 8:00 PM: Celebrities raise money for the earthquake-ravaged nation with the two hour telethon HOPE FOR HAITI. ‘nuf said.

SYFY – 9:00 PM: The big BSG prequel CAPRICA premieres tonight. Yeah, I’m going to give it a try.

STARZ – 10:00 PM: The STARZ original series SPARTACUS takes a 300 inspired approach to telling the story of the main character.

SATURDAY

TBS – 8:00 PM: THE SCREEN ACTORS GUILD AWARDS garners so much respect it airs on TBS. Way to go SAG.

COMEDY – 10:00 PM: ARTIE LANGE’s JACK & COKE re-airs tonight. Stay strong Artie, there’s a lot of us pulling for you.

SUNDAY

ABC – 8:00 PM: A special two hour EXTREME MAKEOVER: HOME EDITION means they plan on tugging on the heart strings in a big way.

Masters Of Song Fu #5: The Winner Revealed!

songfu.png

We here at FRED are true lovers of music, in all its forms. We’re also quite keen on the spirit of competition, and of spurring creativity through said competition.

To that end, we launched a unique form of creative combat here at the Stop.

In this age of manufactured and painfully earnest talent contests, we’ve decided to instead shine a light on the quirky, quixotic underworld of musicians that don’t get nearly the attention they deserve.

Ah, but I did mention that there was a competition involved…

Like a songwriting version of Iron Chef, the competitors will be presented with a very specific songwriting challenge. They’ll be given one week to complete their songs – however they see fit, within the parameters set forth – after which time the entries will be uploaded to Quick Stop to be voted on by you, the audience.

Oh, and what do we call this competition?

MASTERS OF SONG FU

lucyline.gif

Let us not forget the very special Masters of MASTERS OF SONG FU. Think of them as the iron chefs of Song Fu – one of which will be revealed as your ultimate challenger in THE FINAL CHALLENGE. Past Masters have included Jonathan Coulton, Paul & Storm, Neil Innes, The RiffTones, and Garfunkel & Oates. Any one of them could be your final Challenge – or perhaps it could be a brand new Master. Only the Challenger who garners the most cumulative votes in all of the Challenges will move on to the Final and face that Master, mano a mano.

So what was the 1st Challenge?

lucyline.gif

ROUND 1 CHALLENGE

This is a bit of a fun one. Your first task is based upon the work of Friend-of-the-Stop John Hodgman – specifically, the “700 MOLE MEN” listed in his second book, More Information Than You Require. You’ll find the full list of “700 Mole Men” – and their descriptions – HERE. Your task is to choose one (1) and write a song about that Mole Man, based on the description provided by Hodgman. The title of your song will be the name of the Mole Man you’ve chosen, and its corresponding number on the list. You are free to write your song in any style that you choose.

That’s it. The only other directive is that your song must run no shorter than 1 minute.

lucyline.gif

You’ll find the Round 1 songs from each of our Challengers below, as well as the results of the Round 1 voting (As some competitors did not make their Round 2 submission in time, you’ll find those missing songs in the ROUND 1 ZIP FILE, which you can download below).

So what was the 2nd Challenge?

lucyline.gif

ROUND 2 CHALLENGE

Write a song about a number.

That’s right – a song about a number. It can be any number, and it can be describing or representing anything. The number you choose will be the title of your song. The song can be in any style you’d like. Your song must run no shorter than 1 minute.

If you want some inspiration, here’s a number song from Harry Nilsson
[audio:http://asitecalledfred.com/songfu/harry_nilsson-one.mp3]

lucyline.gif

So what was the 3rd Challenge?

lucyline.gif

ROUND 3 CHALLENGE

Write a winter holiday song that is not about the holidays.

Your song can reference the holidays, but must not be explicitly about them. However, it should incorporate instruments and/or a style that evokes the holidays. Your song must run no shorter than 1 minute 30 seconds.

If you want some inspiration, here’s a song from Jona Lewie, “Stop The Cavalry”
[audio:http://asitecalledfred.com/songfu/jona_lewie-stop_the-cavalry.mp3]

lucyline.gif

And now, the big announcement. Due to holiday scheduling issues, the Master for this edition of Song Fu was not able to compete. Therefore, the Challenger with the most votes has been declared the winner, and has become a Master of Song Fu – joining past Challengers Molly Lewis and Berg & Jerry. Despite not getting a go at a Master, our winner decided to do a Final Round song anyway – and you’ll find that below, preceeded by some comments about the song in question, straight from the newly-minted Master, who has won not only the remarkable (and potentially off-putting) bragging rights and a clutch of fantastic mystery prizes, but has also become the proud owner of the magnificent, one-of-a-kind MASTER OF SONG FU TROPHY.

THE MASTER OF SONG FU #5

JOE “COVENANT” LAMB

I’m Joe Covenant. I’m Scottish. And never have enough time to do everything I wanna! Been singing and perfoming for over 40 years… (yes, I am 46.)… and I’ve nearly learned a 6th chord! Everything I do. I do for Song Fu. (If not for this ‘contest’ I would have never met and collaborated with so many talented people.)

When thinking of what to do as a final song, I thought back to my first real Song Fu challenge – “Write a Happy Song” – and, as this win had a hint of bittersweetnes about it, I thought I would flip that first challenge around and “Write a Sad Song”…

…this is it. Thanks to Ken for the Fu, and to all the regs at TooMuchAwesome for inspiration!

Official Website: joecovenant.bandcamp.com
Twitter: twitter.com/JoeCovenant

ROUND 1 SONG:#297 Mr. Tom Furby
[audio:http://asitecalledfred.com/songfu/05song1/joe_covenant_lamb-297-mr_tom_furby.mp3]
ROUND 2 SONG:2
[audio:http://asitecalledfred.com/songfu/05song2/joe_covenant_lamb-2.mp3]
ROUND 3 SONG:Ghoul Tide
[audio:http://asitecalledfred.com/songfu/05song3/joe_covenant_lamb-ghoul_tide.mp3]
FINAL SONG:Life is Hard (… then you die)
[audio:http://asitecalledfred.com/songfu/05song3/joe_covenant_lamb-life_is_hard_then_you_die.mp3]

lucyline.gif

To download a ZIP FILE containing all of the ROUND 3 songs, CLICK HERE.

To download a ZIP FILE containing all of the ROUND 2 songs, CLICK HERE.

To download a ZIP FILE containing all of the ROUND 1 songs, CLICK HERE.

lucyline.gif

ROUND 3 VOTING

lucyline.gif

ROUND 3 VOTING – THE CHALLENGERS RESULTS

[poll id=”23″]

View Results

lucyline.gif

ROUND 2 VOTING – THE CHALLENGERS RESULTS

[poll id=”22″]

View Results

lucyline.gif

ROUND 1 VOTING – THE CHALLENGERS RESULTS

[poll id=”21″]

View Results

lucyline.gif

SIGN-UPS FOR MASTERS OF SONG FU #6 WILL COMMENCE ON MONDAY, JANUARY 25th

[ad#contestbox]

January 16, 2010

FROM THE VAULT: An Interview with Stephen Colbert

Filed under: A Bit Of A Chat With Ken Plume,Interviews — Tags: , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 10:02 am

vaultinterviews.png

Heya folks – Ken Plume here, with an interview from the vaults. I interviewed Stephen Colbert towards the middle of 2003, when it was still possible to set up an in-depth piece with Stephen that wasn’t destined for Entertainment Weekly or The New York Times.

I had followed Colbert ever since I’d seen him as a castmember of the short-lived Dana Carvey Show (bonus points if you can spot me in one of the episode openings), and I kept track of him as he moved on to Exit 57, Strangers With Candy, and then his regular spot as a correspondent on the original Craig Kilborn version of The Daily Show.

When I did this in-depth piece with Stephen, The Daily Show – under Jon Stewart – had begun to take off, and was fast becoming a strong voice in the political and journalistic landscape.

Below, you’ll find my original introduction to the piece, and then my rather large-ish chat with Stephen.

lucyline.gif

Stephen Colbert is perhaps best known as one of the senior correspondents for Comedy Central’s The Daily Show.

Comedy fans, however, also know him as co-creator/writer/star (alongside Amy Sedaris & Paul Dinello) of Comedy Central’s decidedly surreal take-off on preachy afterschool specials, Strangers with Candy (the complete first season of which recently made its DVD debut).

Perhaps less well-known, he co-created (with Robert Smigel) The Ambiguously Gay Duo, providing the voice of Ace to boot. And speaking of cartoon voices, he also does a few for Cartoon Network’s Harvey Birdman, Attorney at Law.

Colbert’s first book, co-written with Sedaris and Dinello, has recently hit book shelves the world over. Wigfield is a somewhat disturbing, completely hilarious view of a small town’s triumphantly pathetic struggle to survive.

A Strangers with Candy movie is on the horizon – until then, though, here’s our in-depth interview with everyone’s favorite fake news anchor…

KEN PLUME: Am I correct in understanding that you’re from South Carolina originally?

STEPHEN COLBERT: I am.

PLUME: Am I also correct in understanding that as a high school student, you weren’t terribly motivated?

COLBERT: Oh no, I was not. I was motivated to play Dungeons & Dragons. I mean highly, highly motivated to play it.

PLUME: How often?

COLBERT: Every day, if I could find someone to play with me. If I couldn’t find someone to play with me, I would work on my player character.

PLUME: That was the heyday of D&D, wasn’t it?

COLBERT: It was, actually. I started playing Dungeons & Dragons the first week it was introduced to the market – at least the first week it was introduced down here. Before Dungeons & Dragons, there was a game called Metamorphosis Alpha, which was also created by Gary Gygax, the guy who created Dungeons & Dragons. I played that, and then we heard this other thing was going to be coming out, called Dungeons & Dragons. The first week it was out, we played it and we were hooked. That was in 1977, I think.

PLUME: What was the big difference between the two that appealed to you?

COLBERT: Well, the difference between the two was Metamorphosis Alpha was Dungeons & Dragons in space, and Dungeons & Dragons was sorcery. I was a huge fan – I read a lot of sorcery.

PLUME: So a big Lord of the Rings fan?

COLBERT: Lord of the Rings, Stephen R. Donaldson, Fritz Leiber – you know, Fafhrd and the Gray Mouser series. Gosh, who else? I can’t believe I can’t remember more of them. Michael Moorcock, The Chronicles of Corum, the Elric – so many.

PLUME: What would the teenager of then think of the Lord of the Rings films?

COLBERT: Well, that part of me is not dead, really. He would be just as apprehensive as I was, before the first film came out. Really, really, really hoping – excited, obviously – but really, really hoping that they don’t blow it. Because they were going to go in with a big enough budget, they were going to create some pretty startling images, and you didn’t want those images to replace the images in your mind.

PLUME: I’m assuming you had bad memories of the Bakshi film.

COLBERT: Oh gosh. That was really important to me at the time, when the Bakshi film came out, and that was pretty devastating. There’s no way – I couldn’t see an upside to that one at all.

PLUME: Yeah, I don’t think there was much of an upside to that.

COLBERT: No. But this one, I have some friends who work at New Line, and so when this film was coming out, they got me into early screenings and that kind of stuff. Like the 28 minute trailer that was shown to press ahead of time. The summer before the movie came out, I saw that 28 minute trailer. I was just shaking by the end of it, I was so excited, at the end of the Moria sequence. They have the unedited, like, 18 minute Moria sequence – uncut 18 minute sequence at the center of it. I was blown away. It wasn’t how I imagined it, and it was fine.

PLUME: Have the films continued to impress you?

COLBERT: I was a little distressed in the second film by what they did with Faramir.

PLUME: Oh, the evilization?

COLBERT: The fact that he succumbs to the power of the ring. Or not so much the power of the ring as he succumbs to …

PLUME: He’s a bit of a bastard in the film.

COLBERT: Well, in the film, he says, “You’re going to Gondor.” I thought, “No, no, no!” One of the greatest moments in the book is when he looks at the ring, he knows what it is, and he says, “Alas for my brother, Boromir. He loved Gondor too much. He was willing to take this thing and use it, but I told you if I found this thing by the side of the road I would not pick it up. And I’m a man of my word.” You know, it changes his tone completely. Then, they go to Osgiliath, where they have this encounter with the Nazgul that doesn’t happen in the book, and then Faramir just changes his mind? Like, the one person in the history of Middle Earth, who when confronted with possession of the ring just changes his mind at some point? That was really heartbreaking.

PLUME: He’s a bit flighty.

COLBERT: Yeah, and actually, I went to go see the world premiere of that, because they had it in New York, and as I’m walking out, a friend of mine who went with me – he knew I was sort of obsessed with the books – said – and I was really upset – said, “So, what did you think?” But Brad Dourif, who plays Grima Wormtongue, was standing right next to me. I couldn’t say anything. I was like, “It was good. It was good.” But then I saw it a second time and I managed to leap that particular puddle, and loved it. I mean, it’s wonderful – but there’s so much that they don’t cover.

PLUME: I think the second film is the most radical departure from the text.

COLBERT: Well I hope so, because that third film’s got a lot riding on it.

PLUME: Of course, who knows what the extra 40 minutes on the deluxe DVD are going to add back in…

COLBERT: Yeah, who knows?

PLUME: Gosh, where did we get off on this tangent?

COLBERT: Oh yeah – “So you weren’t a good student.”

PLUME: Was there anything besides that that interested you? Was there any inkling of performing or writing?

COLBERT: I used to write things for friends. There was this girl I had a crush on, and she had a teacher she didn’t like at school. I had a real crush on her, so almost every day I would write her a little short story where she would kill him in a different way. But, in sort of a James Bond-ian kind of explosives in the gas tank of his car kind of way.

PLUME: Of course, those kind of letters today would have gotten you thrown out of school.

COLBERT: They really would have. They really would have. And all I was doing was I was just trying to impress a girl. I can’t tell you how many of those I wrote. I wonder whether she kept them. I’d love to see them.

PLUME: Put them in a collection?

COLBERT: Or hide them. And I wrote things for the school’s newspaper, and – like all teenagers – I dabbled in poetry.

PLUME: Dabbled in a lot of poetry directed towards this girl as well?

COLBERT: No. I should have… that would have been much wiser. I hear girls are weak for that sort of thing.

PLUME: I guess few people realized just what a creative enterprise role-playing was at that time.

COLBERT: Yeah, nobody realized it. They thought it was warping their children’s minds. Which it might have been, but it also took a lot of creativity to play it.

PLUME: Well how many of those people now are multi-millionaires… or were, before the Internet bubble burst….

COLBERT: Right.

PLUME: So, would you say that your parents pushed you in any one direction, or they were just hoping that you would find a direction?

COLBERT: No, they were just hoping that I would find a direction. Just very supportive of what I eventually decided to try to do. But would have been perfectly happy if I had been lawyer or been a potter.

PLUME: Just something productive?

COLBERT: Just something that could pay the rent.

PLUME: Was it difficult getting into Hampden-Sydney?

COLBERT: Oh no, it was not. It was easy to get in, hard to stay. They accept a lot of people, but they failed a huge percentage of the freshman class.

PLUME: So was it a bait and switch?

COLBERT: No, it was a “playtime’s over” kind of place.

PLUME: They lure you in with easy admittance …

COLBERT: And then they hammered you. It was really hard work. I would have to say it was harder at Hampden-Sydney than it was Northwestern.

PLUME: At any point were you on the verge of dropping out?

COLBERT: No, no, no, no. I did very well. I applied myself.

PLUME: How much of a wakeup call was it?

COLBERT: I knew that I had never been applying myself when I was in high school, and so I knew that this was my last chance. So, I worked very hard. The hardest part was I didn’t have the disciplinary skills. I didn’t have the self-discipline, so it took a lot more time to do the work I needed to do than it took the better students.

PLUME: How long did it take to finally learn that discipline?

COLBERT: Probably my freshman year. By the time I got to my sophomore year, I realized that you actually had to be like an Ovaltine commercial. You had to finish classes, come back to your room, and immediately start working. Then, after that was over, then it was playtime.

PLUME: I’ve never really heard of Hampden-Sydney being a party school …

COLBERT: Well, it was to a certain extent, but I wasn’t Greek. I didn’t become part of the fraternity system, which is where that would happen – and I purposely didn’t join them, so I would work harder.

PLUME: What was the major that you were leaning towards there?

COLBERT: I don’t know. Philosophy is what I took most classes in.

PLUME: So, nothing that would have been applicable after college.

COLBERT: No …

Continued below…

Please take a moment to DONATE

Filed under: Articles — Tags: , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 6:58 am

donateheader.png

If you enjoy all of the podcasts, interviews, live events, articles, and columns here at FRED and would like to see them keep going, PLEASE take a moment to click on the DONATE or SUBSCRIBE buttons below and give whatever you can spare.

We have two options for you…you can either DONATE a one-time amount of your choosing or “SUBSCRIBE” for a year at either $5, $10 or $20 a month.

You can give a little or you can give a lot, but whatever it is, it’s genuinely and truly appreciated.

Subscribe for $5 a month for one year:





Subscribe for $10 a month for one year:





Subscribe for $20 a month for one year:





Create your own *one-time* donation of any amount:





January 15, 2010

Weekend Shopping Guide 1/15/10: Yellow Fever

weekendshopping.png

The weekend’s here. You’ve just been paid, and it’s burning a hole in your pocket. What’s a pop culture geek to do? In hopes of steering you in the right direction to blow some of that hard-earned cash, it’s time for the FRED Weekend Shopping Guide – your spotlight on the things you didn’t even know you wanted…

(Please support FRED by using the links below to make any impulse purchases – it helps to keep us going…)

Ignore all of the pale-wannabes and unfortunate attempts to adapt it for other markets, and stick with the original UK edition of Top Gear, hosted by the madman trinity of Jeremy Clarkson, James May, and Richard Hammond. If you don’t like cars, don’t worry – I could care less about cars, but love this show something fierce, and it all comes down to the energy, likeability, and humor of the presenters. Don’t believe me? Check out the newly-released Top Gear: Season 11 (BBC, Not Rated, DVD-$29.98 SRP) & Top Gear: Season 12 (BBC, Not Rated, DVD-$39.98 SRP) and judge for yourself. The 2-disc 11th season is barebones, but the 12th season contains audio commentary on the epic Vietnam and Botswana specials, deleted scenes, extended segments, and deleted scenes.

thinkgeek-01.jpg

Tongs? Who wants use tongs when you’re cooking hot food! Heck, if you use tongs, you probably use oven mitts, too! Well, join the future and start on your journey to become more machine than man by getting a pair of Fusion Silicon Finger Tongs ($17.99 each), which are wearable heat-resistant implements that allow you to pretend you’re a cooking robot. Because you always wanted to do that. Right?

thinkgeek-02.jpg

Jumping ahead of about 7 unreleased seasons, Springfield’s first family celebrates two decades on the air with the release of The Simpsons: The Complete Twentieth Season (Fox, Not Rated, DVD-$49.98 SRP). Flying in the face of previous sets loaded with commentaries on every episode, this is a paractically bare-bones release, with only an abbreviated version of the 20th anniversary special by Morgan Spurlock. However, as this was the first season to feature episodes broadcast in widescreen HD, this is also the first season to be released on in a Blu-Ray edition ($59.99 SRP). The bonus feature is the same, but it looks oh-so-sweet in high-def. I just wish the episodes themselves were funnier.

blankguide.gif

I don’t know how much work he actually did on it besides lending it his name (or if he’s even read it), but George Lucas’s Blockbusting (It Books, $29.99 SRP) is a fascinating examination of 300 of the most financially and critically successful films in Hollywood history, examining their creation, production, marketing, reception, and legacy via factoids, tidbits, and contest that’s a page-turner for any cinema nerd. Like me. And, most likely, you.

blankguide.gif

If you’re not yet aware of the work being done by the fine folks at La-La Land Records, let this be your wake-up call. They’ve been quietly releasing a whole slew of limited edition, much-requested soundtracks to classic flicks, and the latest to get their treatment is Caddyshack (La-La Land Records, $19.98). Not only do you get the tunes (“I’m Alright”, “Any Way You Want It”), you also get cues from Johnny Mandel’s score.

blankguide.gif

I’m always game when someone shakes up the chat show format with a unique take – made all the better when it’s hosted by someone that you actually want to spend time with. Such is the case with Elvis Costello’s Spectacle (MVD, Not Rated, DVD-$49.95 SRP), which combines live music performances by his guests with candid conversation that doesn’t come from heavily pre-planned, all-too-brief talk show appearances. The 5-disc first season set features the likes of Elton John, Lou Reed, Smokey Robinson, James Taylor, Rufus Wainwright, Roseanne Cash, and more. Bonus materials include bonus songs and backstage interviews. A Blu-Ray edition ($69.95 SRP) is available, with identical bonus materials.

blankguide.gif

Combine an anniversary of an evergreen title with rather unfortunate recent events, and you get a 10th anniversary special edition of the Shakespeare in high school 10 Things I Hate About You (Touchstone, Rated PG-13, DVD-$19.99 SRP), which shovels on a retrospective documentary, an audio commentary, and deleted scenes. A Blu-Ray edition ($28.99 SRP) is also available, with identical bonus materials. Also available is the first volume from the TV series of 10 Things I Hate About You (ABC Studios, Not Rated, DVD-$29.99 SRP), featuring 10 episodes, the pilot, audio commentaries, featurettes, and bloopers.

blankguide.gif

In the late 80’s when it made its debut, Mighty Mouse: The New Adventures (Paramount, Not Rated, DVD-$45.98 SRP) was bizarre, particularly when compared with the other Saturday-morning cartoons surrounding it. Under the supervision of Ralph Bakshi, our hero’s adventures became surreal and odd in a way that paved the way for the likes of Ren & Stimpy and Spongebob. If you don’t believe me, look no further than this 2-disc set, which contains all 19 episodes, plus a trio of classic Terrytoons Mighty Mouse cartoons and an interview-packed featurette.

blankguide.gif

It’s often overlooked as the odd period between Cheers and his recent renaissance on Damages and Bored To Death, but Becker (Paramount, Not Rated, DVD-$36.98 SRP) was an often dependable workhorse sitcom starring Ted Danson. The 3-disc complete 3rd season contains all 24 episodes featuring the Bronx-dwelling doc.

blankguide.gif

From the editors of McSweeney’s comes Heads On And We Shoot (It Books, $39.99 SRP), a wonderfully unique (in its presentation, at least) look at the making of Spike Jonze’s adaptation of Maurice Sendak’s Where The Wild Things Are. The books is presented in three sections, laid out as a book (with covers) literally within a book. See? Unique! And the behind-the-scenes info is fun, too.

blankguide.gif

You can feel the creak beginning to set in as we enter the 12th season of ER (Warner Bros., Not Rated, DVD-$49.98 SRP), even though Dr. Victor Clemente arrives on the scene and Maura Tierney’s Abby becomes even more front and center. The 6-disc set contains all 22 episodes, plus unaired scenes and outtakes.

blankguide.gif

Bring the classic run of the series to a close before the lackluster post-movie, set-in-the-future episodes with the release of Transformers Season 2: Volume 2 (Shout Factory, Not Rated, DVD-$29.99 SRP). The 4-disc set contains 21 episodes, a featurette, PSAs, toy commercials, and concept art.

blankguide.gif

Don’t let the often cornball series keep you from seeing the original feature Fame (Warner Bros., Rated R, Blu-Ray-$39.99 SRP), a gritty, often bleak, yet uplifting look at the students of New York City’s High School For The Performing Arts. The new Blu-Ray features a reunion commentary, a vintage featurette, a look at the school that inspired the movie, the theatrical trailer, and a bonus CD sampler of the soundtrack.

blankguide.gif

They’ve become cable classics over the years, despite their last-gasp, 80’s style over-the-top action cheese, but my do Last Action Hero & Cliffhanger (Sony, Rated PG-13/R, Blu-Ray-$24.95 SRP each) look good in high definition, Last Action Hero is featureless, but Cliffhanger delivers audio commentaries, deleted scenes, featurettes, an introduction from director Renny Harlin, and more.

blankguide.gif

Lionsgate is releasing handful of their music & musician-centric feature films in a series their calling “Music Makers”, all of which come packed with a sampler CD featuring a track each from the musicians highlighted in the films (with an additional cut from Bobby Darin). The films in question are the Darin biopic Beyond The Sea (Lionsgate, Rated PG-13, DVD-$14.98 SRP), Ray Charles in Ballad In Blue (Lionsgate, Not Rated, DVD-$14.98 SRP), Sammy Davis Jr. in A Man Called Adam (Lionsgate, Not Rated, DVD-$14.98 SRP), and Buena Vista Social Club (Lionsgate, Rated G, DVD-$14.98 SRP).

blankguide.gif

Maybe it’s in films like Wrong Turn At Tahoe (Paramount, Rated R, DVD-$14.98 SRP) that Cuba Gooding Jr begins to claw his way back from such memorable missteps as Boat Trip and Snow Dogs. In this direct-to-DVD mob flick, Gooding is a Mafia protégé tasked with taking out a drug dealer. Unfortunately, he finds out the titular Tahoe works for a really big mob boss (Harvey Keitel) who expects payment for the lost revenue. Give it a spin.

blankguide.gif

I never really cottoned to the BBC’s recent slick & shiny take on Robin Hood (BBC, Not Rated, DVD-$59.98 SRP), but I know a healthy fanbase has grown up around it, and are surely awaiting the third season’s arrival. Sadly for them, that third season is the final one, and this 5-disc set features all 13 episodes, plus featurettes and video diaries.

blankguide.gif

While you’re patiently awaiting the arrival of Sideshow Collectibles’ own premium format version of Dave Stevens’ Rocketeer, why not pick up the Real Action Heroes 12″ version of The Rocketeer ($164.99) from Medicom Toy – conveniently from Sideshow Collectibles. The tailoring is spot-on and the overall effect is nifty, and it’s certainly a fun piece. You know you want it. Admit it.

weekendpicks20100108-18

weekendpicks20100115-19

So there you have it… my humble suggestions for what to watch, listen to, play with, or waste money on this coming weekend. See ya next week…

-Ken Plume

##

Ken P. D. Snyde-Cast #130: Exciting And New

Filed under: Ken P.D. Snydecast — Tags: , , , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 4:10 am

snydecast-header.png

snydecast-logo2.png

Adult Swim’s Dana Snyder and Quick Stop Entertainment’s Ken Plume set out to have a literate conversation between two pals, but inevitably devolve into a verbal, and funny, free-for-all full of bickering, infighting, and the special kind of male bonding that comes from conflict expressed through the podcast medium.

Actor/comedian/raconteur Dana Snyder, you’re certainly aware, is Aqua Teen Hunger Force’s Master Shake, Squidbillies‘ Granny, Minoriteam’s Dr. Wang, and The Venture Bros.‘ Alchemist. Available for weddings and bar mitzvahs (bat availability pending), you can keep tabs on him via his website, www.eyeofthesnyder.com.

Ken Plume is the editor-in-chief here at FRED. He is a friend of Dana’s, as well as his arch-nemesis.

VISIT THE SNYDECAST EXPERIENCE

linesm.gif

KEN P.D. SNYDECAST #130: Exciting And New – Ken & Dana return with lingering colds and faux-pep aplenty, and what starts out on the wrong foot quickly boards a ship and journeys into a discussion about love. On a boat. You could call it a Love Boat.

[CONTENT WARNING]: This podcast may contain some foul language and horribly off-color jokes. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
Episode #130 (MP3 format)

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/snydecast/ken_p_d_snyde_cast-130.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

Got something to say? E-mail Dana & Ken at the Snydecast mailbag.

line.gif

CLICK HERE FOR THE SNYDECAST ARCHIVES

line.gif

##

Trailer Park: Zachary Levi – Part 2

By Christopher Stipp

The Archives, Right Here

I was able to sit down for a couple of years and pump out a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

Check out my new column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

Departures DVD – Review

dep

The fact that this film beat out Waltz with Bashir and The Class at last year’s Academy Awards should be an indication of how good Departures really is. Not saying it should be a sticker on its box cover but it is a compelling fact on top of the one that this is really that good.

For those who need the CliffsNotes version of the story it is thus: A talented musician/father, Daigo (Masahiro Motoki), takes solace in his music as a professional cellist. When he finds himself in the unemployment line after his orchestra goes bankrupt, with no work and no way to make ends meet, the family packs up and moves back to his hometown where he grew up as a boy. With no prospects for any kind of musical employment Daigo answers an ad to help prepare dead bodies. Hiding the job from his wife, learning what it means to be alive, learning what it means to die, all play into a story that is at the same time satisfying and slightly inspiring.

Where director Yojiro Takita genuinely excels is crafting a movie that is at once affirming and interesting. This is Daigo’s story, to be sure, but the way in which we navigate the waters of personal grief that never overpowers the notion that this is Daigo’s tale to tell shows how well Takita can back off when he needs to, never pushing a schmaltzy Frank Capra-esque “It’s great to be alive!” kind of agenda. The action is understated and always very aware of itself. Sometimes, it’s too aware and the way in which Daigo finds his own way to enlightenment about his own life, and the many things that have held him back for so many years as an adult, and it is this, I feel, is where the Academy really saw something in this film.

True, there is nothing new here about the emotional state of mankind that made this an absolute shoo-in to win an Oscar, The Class had a much more direct and profound statement to make, but it is a film that transcends so many boundaries and does get at the inane blocks we sometimes place on ourselves. The movie is great because it doesn’t get bogged down with the superfluous but it also misses an opportunity to delve deeper into the emotional core of our character; while we see a lot of ourselves in this film, you understand, there should have been more we see of Daigo’s own transformation. There is no way you can go wrong with a viewing of this film and more than deserves a few of your rental dollars. What it has to say and show about death, mortality, and the unique preparation of our corporeal bodies, is enough to warrant a couple of hours of your time here on earth.

Zachary Levi – Interview- Part 2

It’s hard to look into the future when it comes to broadcasting but Zach Levi knows enough that it could be mistaken for yet another one of Chuck’s skills. Star of the program that bears his likeness in so many promos that you wonder whether the network is trading in the peacock for his delicate mug, Levi has a lot to say when it comes to reflecting on the previous seasons of the show. As well, he’s more than an open book to discuss what happens when the very same network pushing your show on the viewers of the channel whacks your budget and the effects it has on those who act in it. There was more than enough of the Straight Talk Express to go around and Levi let loose, literally not letting me get a word in edgewise. When last we left off with Levi, he was explaining what happened when he visited jolly ol’ England to talk about the show months ago, on the verge of cancellation, and ended up becoming a Sandwich Artist for the day.

Chuck is now back to its normal time on Monday, 8/7C on NBC

chuck1LEVI: So it was right around the corner from where the convention was and Adam and I had a panel on Saturday. We already talked about Chuck and we were supposed to have another panel with another actor who didn’t end up making the convention so it was just going to be me.  And I said I didn’t want to just sit up there and say the same things so I said, “Hey, instead of me just talking, who wants to go walk over to Subway and have some sandwiches?”

And, literally, almost everyone at the convention got up and went over to Subway.

Then we got over there and I ordered a sandwich and the people at Subway said, “Would you like to come back and make it a photo op and make a sandwich?”  So I said “Yeah” and I went back behind the counter and made a sandwich and I was in the middle of the production line, bur I ended up making about 250 sandwiches.  It was so surreal.  I’m in a Subway, in England, with a bunch of my fellow nerds at a convention that is part of this grassroots campaign, people I’ve never seen before, and here we are.  And then that got traction and it went out to everybody at Warner Bros. and NBC and I just don’t know, man.

It’s a unique and special thing to be a part of and I feel like later in my career I hope to be a part of something that special ““ be a part of things that are so symbiotic with the fans ““ the people that means the most too.  You can be out there and make great stuff and good movies and all that but to be in the trenches with them ““ to see if a miracle does happen ““ and it did happen.

CS:  It did.  I can’t imagine what that did for you knowing that this was all going on and your job was in the balance publicly.  If I was about to get fired and everyone knew about it, I don’t know how I would hold myself together.  It must be a unique position for you. But now that you have your third season, do you have an idea of where this third season is going to go when you kick back up again?  Was there always a third season tentatively written?

LEVI: I am sure that they had ideas and a good idea of the overall premise of where the third season would go.  But, when the future is that uncertain, I don’t know how much time as a writer, and I am, but I’ve never been in their particular shoes, where it’s like, “OK we have two seasons under our belts.  How much time are we going to dedicate to cracking stories?”  It could be all for naught, you know?  But I know that certainly the second season was left as a cliff hanger.  The second season I download the new intersect 2.0 and at least temporarily have kung-fu and that’s the last line.  I know kung-fu and we’re out.  You just can’t “¦Everybody was, “Oh my god, what the heck is going on?”  It’s crazy.  And because Chuck, why it’s a special show for the Comic-Con crowd is because Chuck is the Comic-Con goer.  If you look in our art department, my room is litered with Comi-Con badges by my desk.  So I feel the fun of the show is that they get to live vicariously through Chuck and vicariously they get to learn kung-fu as we go into the third season you find out that these powers are fleeting.  The intersect has its glitches.  It was not meant for me.  It was meant for Bryce Larkin who is already a super secret agent and is cool…so I don’t have the capability to turn it on and off.

Whether it’s fighting skills or speaking another language or playing an instrument or operating machinery, whatever the case may be, it’s all these physical attributes that Chuck now has the power to tap into but they only last for a certain amount of time and so we’ll get some great action out of it but then at the same time there will be some great comedy because of those moments where, for example, we’re on a mission and a couple of big baddies step up and I say “Guys, I got this” and I strike my pose but nothing is happening and these guys are coming to beat the crap out of me or something like that.  It is certainly not at will, kind of happens as it does, and it’s perfect because if I could just retain kung-fu the show wouldn’t make any sense anymore.  I have to be the everyman.

If I, all of a sudden, could protect myself, Casey and Sarah, we wouldn’t need them anymore.  I would just be a secret agent.  I wouldn’t have a home life anymore, so there goes my sister and Awesome and Morgan and everybody.  But this way we’ve opened this new door of all these possibilities and Josh and Chris and the rest of our writers have done an excellent job of setting up that world and now in the third season they are just going to dive into it.  I’m sure they have all kind of fun ideas.

CS:  Exactly.  Going back to the idea that fans…when you are out talking and people are talking to you, why do so many people, in your opinion, embrace the show and feel like it’s their show?  What is it about it that people really want to protect?

Zachary LeviLEVI: I think that A) it is the element that Chuck is one of them and I feel partly that like Josh and I, we are Chuck and Morgan, not entirely, but when we say we’re gamers, we are genuine gamers.  And I think that there is an honesty that comes through in that and that’s not a pat on our back by any means but certainly I feel like the audience feels less duped.  I feel like they get to watch the characters and feel like that these guys are like that too.  They are on Xbox and like comic books ““ so on a personal level I think they are invested in us too which I think is a really awesome thing.  But then on top of that I think it’s an entertaining show and speaks to the fanboy and fangirl.  We nod to and allude to, not rip off”¦

(Laughs)

But certainly a homage to so many of the classic either spy movies, sci-fi movies or fantasy, we’re like Sandworm from Dune, whatever.  We have great guest stars that are all from that world, or many of them are.  Like Scott Bakula playing my dad, that’s huge, or Trisha Helfer came on and played an agent on the show.  Any bit that we give I feel it’s our duty to do that because I think it’s staying true to our fan base ““ gives them more reason to stay with it.  Then, on top of that, aside from the fanboy/fangirl Comic-Con world, paired with that the show itself has a really big family audience because we’re an 8:00 o’clock show so you can’t do too much that’s too risqué, although some of the lingerie”¦ But one of the coolest things I’ve gotten out of this whole experience on Chuck is how many parents have come up to me for 3 years now, or 2 going into our 3rd, just saying, “Thank you.  Thank you that you have given me and my kids an hour of television that we get to sit down and hang out together and we watch the show and we all dig it.  We all dig it for different reasons.  My son loves the action and we love the whole spy world stuff.  It’s so silly and fun.”  Or some moms say, “I think Alan Baldwin is the sexist man alive.”  Whatever.

And a lot of gamers are really into the Chuck Morgan stuff hoping that we get to bring that bromance and best buddy stuff back and just speaking to the nerds and speaking to everybody with the multi-genre thing, we are a cornucopia of genre which is very difficult to balance and, quite frankly, a pain in the ass sometimes, but that’s what makes the show unique.  There is nothing like Chuck on television.  There’s just nothing like it.  And that’s not necessarily a good thing it’s just ““ it is.  It’s a mini movie every week and we speak to genre people and we speak to sci-fi people and we speak to gamers and nerds and speak to families and even the guy/guys out there who say the girls are, “So hot on your show.”  I think it’s all that stuff…We get these people and get a lot of them.  I think we get a lot of different people and get a little bit of everybody and it makes it a very kind of different and dynamic show.  And, on top of all of that, I think the reason why people are with us and stay with us and are invested in the show is because now they have genuinely become a part of our survival and our livelihood.  They are the crucial part of why we are still around and I think it’s the best kind of situation you can be a part of because you know that it’s worth something at the end of the day.

I love acting.  I love what I get to do.  I hope I get to do it for the rest of my life but certainly there are many, many times where I’m doing it and saying, “Does this really mean anything? ” There are guys and girls overseas defending our freedoms abroad.  Those guys are putting their lives on the line.  That means something.  Or Caltrans guys working on the sides of the roads keeping the freeways going, those jobs do something.  I’m an entertainer.  What does that mean at the end of the day?  But, for an hour a week, you bring a smile to somebody’s face and it’s not just a smile.  It’s a smile that is rooted so deeply and they are willing to offer up their time and energy to keep it going because they want that smile or they want those tears in those dramatic moments we have.  They want that adrenaline in those action packed moments.

This whole weekend, especially today after our panel, it’s just humbling.  Everything has been very humbling.  It certainly gives me a renewed appreciation for what we do and I want to be able to just keep this going and carry that to the next 13 episodes and just make them awesome and keep giving the fans what they want.

CS:  Going into the 3rd season, knowing how number 2 turned out, fate being what it is with the show, does Chuck need to change in order to stay afloat?

0000043360_20070924122705LEVI: We’ve already seen some changes and those changes have all been kind of monetary, budget restricting changes which is across the board, really.  Some shows didn’t come back at all because they just couldn’t work it on with the budget or they were already on season 7 and it’s like…look, Without a Trace for example was in the top 10 shows or something and it didn’t come back.  That was making huge numbers and far bigger numbers than us.  So across the board, studios, networks, everybody feels it so I, as tough as it is sometimes, would be like, “Come on, give us a little bit of love.”

I know that sometimes the buck just gets passed and passed and passed and it just has to be.  So we’ve seen that already. Take Josh Gomez, he was in all the shows produced and now it’s 11 of 13.  So he’s not in every episode but he’s going to be in the majority of the episodes.  I think Adam, Yvonne, and I are the only ones all shows produced.  And that’s a bummer.  When the show first started to me it was like, it’s Chuck torn between his family life and his new spy life.  It was Adam and Yvonne on this side and it was Josh and Sarah on this side.  So to see somebody come and get demoted, if you will, that bums me out for Josh.  Not just for his pocketbook, although you do feel that, obviously.  But just kind of on a that’s just sucks.  Not fun news to hear.  But, Julia Ling, who played Anna Wu, she’s not on the show at all.  And I know they have reached out to her and said “We’d like for you to come back and guest star” but she might have other things she’s working on.  I don’t know.  So that kind of stuff is tough.

Our overall budget has been cut half a million dollars.  And we were already in a place where getting the job done where we were was tough in the time and money we had allotted.  Now we lost a day on our schedule and we lost a good portion of our budget so it’ll be interesting.  I don’t know how but I believe that it can, I know we will.  There is no turning back.  We have 13 episodes to do and this is the money we have to do it.

You just have to have faith that whatever is meant to be is meant to be and we will still be able to produce the show if fans are with.  And at the end of the day, I don’t think we’ll lose fans because we didn’t go to a location necessarily.

LEVI: You lose people when you stop being true to the characters.  And stop being true to the relationships.  And stop being true to what the heart is all about.  And I think also because our fans are now so very in on ““ pretty much everybody knows that we lost money in the budget, Josh Schwartz was in today talking about it at the panel.  We had budget cuts and blah blah blah so I think fans will give you a pass.  As long as it doesn’t look like it was shot on a camcorder.

(Laughs)

And as long as everybody stays true to the heart of what the show is about and we’re still doing everything we can to make it the best show we can.  I think they will stay with us.  I don’t think they’d come this far and then say, “Ah, whatever.”Â  Look at a show like Heroes.  Yes, they slipped a little bit in their numbers but they went through some rocky times.  The first season it was the biggest thing in the world.  And then it wasn’t exactly the show people loved the first season.  It was different.  Some people thought “I don’t know, I like this version more” and they tried to come back in the third season and now a fourth season and they still have a full packed hall at Comic-Con.  So, the dedicated fans will stay.  They invested that time.

chuck_nbc_tv_show_image_zachary_levi_and_yvonne_strahovskiI am a huge fan of Lost.  And when they hit ““ I thought second season was fantastic.  The first half of the third season, had maybe writer changes, but you are not getting the mythology, not getting questions answered, just more and more questions, but not questions at all, just day to day living and I’m like, “Come on, what’s going on?’  And then they went on hiatus and came back and the second half of the third season was some of the best television I ever saw in my entire life.  I was like, “YES, here’s my show.”  And I felt good because I didn’t give up, I could have, but I didn’t and you feel good that you stayed and it’s still to me the best show on TV.  I love Lost.  I can’t wait to find out what’s going to happen.  I’m dying.

CS:  Last question:  You’ve been a very public face for Chuck.  Why have you taken such an active role in coming out and stumping and being who you are regarding Chuck’s fate in the public sphere. What part of your personality does that come from?

LEVI: Thank you.  I appreciate that.  I think it’s a couple of things.

I think A) it’s just the way God made me but, hey, everybody’s got different things.  Some people ““ I don’t fault anybody for not – people have different personalities and I’ve always been an outgoing gregarious guy anyway.  But I feel it’s a particular paradigm from the beginning of when I started my career ““ and it’s funny because I was just talking to somebody about this today but again I don’t fault anybody because we’re all different ““ some artists are very close and they are just more introverted types of people or something and that’s them and that’s cool and rock and roll.  I feel like some people their philosophy on the business is the less you give the more they want so they hold back.  You don’t know anything about Johnny Depp so you want to more about Johnny Depp.  I don’t even know if that’s who Johnny Depp is but he’s a mysterious kind of guy.

But it really started with the first show I did, Less than Perfect.  Somebody I was talking to said “You shouldn’t really open up too much to fans because the more you give the less they’ll want” or something.  I was new and I thought about it for a second and thought, “Whatever.”  But for me, if I can just maintain ,for multiple reasons,  as a regular person, that’s the most I can do.  Who knows?  In 20 years,  if I continue to be blessed and I continue to work and do good things and my star rises, if you will, and it gets really nutty so that I can’t even walk on the floor at Comic-Con without getting attacked or something, things happen and you have to start making boundaries so you don’t die.  But, until then, I say be you.  Take every opportunity that you can to thank people and be there with them.  Honestly, I feel like any opportunity that you can share a bit of you you can gain a support for your whole career.  Not that you do it for that reason but the reason behind it is because you know how much they care.  You know how much it means to them.

Somebody could be having the worst day of their life but they see you ““ I can see someone on the floor at Comic-Con and they tried to go talk to so-and-so or they don’t have enough money to go buy the comic they wanted and they are just kind of moping around, and all of a sudden they look up and they say “Hey, you’re Chuck. Can I take a picture?” and I say “Yeah, whatever, I’ll take a picture with you” and for the rest of the weekend they are on Cloud Nine”¦or maybe not”¦they could be saying, “Oh, burn it!”

(Laughs)

You don’t know.  But I feel like until you have to build walls I think it’s the wrong way to go.  And, again, you have to be careful.  People do want a lot from you and some people don’t know where that’s it’s OK to stop.  And fortunately I have friends and family around me that will be there for me and give me a little tap on the shoulder like, “Hey, we got to go because we’ll be here forever.”

I don’t know.  It’s just my philosophy.  You take things as they come.  I mean, I’m in the UK with a Subway around the corner, and Wendy, who started the campaign to save the show, is there. “What are you going to do for the finale tomorrow?” she asked. I responded, “Guess I’ll go to Subway and ask if anyone wants to go.”  But if that didn’t happen…maybe there was no Subway around the corner…maybe Wendy wasn’t there.  Then it probably wouldn’t have happened.  I don’t know.  But I just think you have to be open to what can be done or what should be done.  In that particular moment, you take it moment by moment sometimes and just try to be as honest and as real and hopefully as loving as you can.

No matter what, even if the show didn’t get picked up, I feel like it was still the right thing to do.

Musical MySpace Tour #4

Filed under: Musical Myspace Tour — Tags: , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 3:59 am

myspacemusic.png

This was supposed to get here two weeks ago. This was also supposed to contain different bands to the ones I review this week. Essentially, nothing has gone right.

Eight months ago I changed from a PC to a Mac. I needed to acquaint myself with Final Cut and my PC at the time was very low spec. Eight months is all it lasted before the hard-drive died. The reason why I’m talking about a laptop in a music review column is because I had written a Musical MySpace article I was particularly proud of, but before I could send it to anyone… well, Apple fucked up. Considering I vowed to review EVERY band that sends me a friend request, you would think I need to go back and write my views on these musicians again, right? Unfortunately, MySpace apparently deletes friend invites after about a month, and despite the fact that I had the band URLs saved in a document, well… I’m boring myself with this already.

Needless to say, if all that information can be retrieved, I will get back to it and publish it here – but in the mean time, I’m still getting friend requests, so I need to review the new batch at the very least. I owe it to them! I owe it to these musicians to tear their hard work apart with snide remarks and poor wit. Where would the world be if I didn’t?

It’s a new year, a new decade, a new way of backing up my files (move it along, Aaron), but bands are still using MySpace as a way of getting noticed. Let’s see if any of them are worth noting.
————————————————————————
music-abacayABACAY
www.myspace.com/abacayie

Abacay are the duo of Melany Morganstern and Miles Torrance. I probably won’t be talking about their music much. They make vanilla seem like a party in your mouth. Bland. She can sing ok, I guess, and the music sounds like you’ve heard it before, in an elevator. Or from The Lighthouse Family. Your mum would probably love it.

What interests me most, however, are some of the things on their site page.

First of all, there is a song called “Madonna”, and another named “Moby”. Neither have anything to do with the musicians of the same names, it seems, but this confused me at first when it had the words “Sample” in brackets on the titles. I probably got the wrong end of the stick entirely with the lines “Please, I’m on my knees/ please, Madonna please” too. Oo-err missus!

I got a massive giggle from the little question and answer section on the sidebar. Not just for the broken English (this kind of electro-pop-crap music could only be done by our European brethren) but also for this quote “Are Melany and Miles living together? No. Are they in relationships and will the public get to know more about? Melany and Miles please to repect their privacy.” WOW. Not only have they left the glaring misspelling of “respect” (Aretha would not be pleased) but… WHO THE HELL CARES?

All this does is make me want to find out more about these two. Why did they bother to include such a thing if nothing was going on? What have they got to hide? Who is moving around in the attic? I’m 6 foot, why can’t I dunk in basketball? It’s all madness! Despite it being none of my business and of no real interest, it’s still ten times more fascinating than the music on offer here.

When reviewing musicians for this article, I like to play their songs on loop for a while so I can soak it all in. Not once could I tell the difference between any of these songs – and there are 10 available. It’s musical wallpaper.

Presentation = 3/5
Content = Outside of the bad interview there is nothing outside of the norm
Music = 2/5
Friend Request = DENIED!

————————————————————————–
music-freddywilliamsFREDDY WILLIAMS
www.myspace.com/dikshunary

Hear me now! It’s gospel-reggae! You can’t beat it. And if you do beat it, you’re going to hell… Or Jamaica. I haven’t decided which, yet.

Freddy Williams, AKA Alantonio Reggae/Soca – I’m not lying it says so in his blurb – has apparently been plying his trade for over 20 years. I’m a little confused by this statement, however, as it also says in his “about me” that he has had a 15 year musical hiatus and has only been performing/recording for 6 years. First off, if you don’t do something for 15 years, it’s not a hiatus anymore. You just stopped doing it. Secondly, if you’ve done something for 6 years, you’re not allowed say that you’ve done it for over 20. That maths just don’t work, even if Jesus likes you. Jesus knew his maths. You had to be good at maths to sort out the loaves and fishes for a large party deal. Get it together.

Freddy seems like a good guy. His songs are full of positive sentiments and melodies. Lots of joy and love is being shared. Good to his Mammy (just listen to his song “Mama’s Love”) and good to his woman (any other song). Just not good to my ears.

It’s not that he’s not likable, in fact he has got that quality in abundance. The problem is that he doesn’t have any originality. If you’ve heard the soundtrack to Cool Runnings, you’ve heard any one of Freddy’s songs. And this is not a slight on reggae music – there is some fantastic stuff out there – it’s just a slight against making stereotypical reggae music. This is like listening to genre by numbers. Steel drums and all.

Presentation = 2/5
Content = Just some music and a lot of bullshit about himself.
Music = 2/5
Friend Request = DENIED!

————————————————————————
music-5sadows5 SADOWS
www.myspace.com/5sadows

You know, it’s getting tough to do this. It’s the “about me” section that is getting to me this week. To prove my point regarding what I’m up against here, I’m going to directly quote 5 Sadows:

“5 Sadows were created back on 2003, by Greg, the band started as a cover band, with the name ‘Venus’ back then, covering mostly ‘HIM’ songs. Later Greg and Man P, decided to take the band to the next level with a new name, ‘5 Sadows’, and with a new plan, they started to compose their own songs. The band had a name and some songs, but there was an empty space, the band didn’t had a personal sound, so Greg decided to keep the old fashioned Fuzz distortion pedal and combine it with some Octave, and the band used the Octafuzz distortion pedal as a basic sound for the guitars, but the lyrics were too sentimental for such a noisy guitar sound and Greg decided to use some more melancholic and ominous keyboards. The actual idea behind the band is the dark atmosphere with lyrics that will make people think what is Love and Hate, Life and Death, Dark and Light, and take people to a beautiful journey though the Gardens of ‘5 Sadows’.”

Now, tell me how enthusiastic you are to listen to the songs after reading that shit. If there is one piece of advice I can give to a band, considering I’m not a musician, it’s to keep those things straightforward and honest. Keep the pretension at home, or limit it to what you tell girls at parties to try and impress them. Unfortunately, the music is just as pretentious.

What worries me most, however, is that all the sample songs (he we are with samples again, sigh) have over 850,000 plays each. WHAT THE FUCK?! Really? 5 Sadows are from Athens, Greece and are seemingly a big deal. Who knew? Also, who new Greg was a common name in Greece?

It seems whiney goth rock is just as popular in Greece as the rest of the world. Zeus damn it. I wonder if they get how appropriate “5 Sad-ohs” is as a name.

Presentation = 4/5
Content = Nothing in full, I’m not even sure the words are full, they’re probably also samples.
Music = 2/5
Friend Request = DENIED!

————————————————————————–
music-femmepopFEMMEPOP
www.myspace.com/femmepop

oooOOOoooo. Interesting.

The current music scene around these parts is littered with female singer/songwriters, from the excellent and Irish Cathy Davey and Lisa Hannigan to Britain’s own Duffy and Adele. Femmepop, or Margaret O’Sullivan as she’s know to her mother, could fight it out with this bunch without any need of a handicap.

Her songs range from the slightly tougher, darker tones of “Good” to lullabies like “Kick”. Her site features quotes attributed to the likes of Hotpress magazine and Phantom radio DJ Edel Coffey. “Kick” also holds my favourite lyric of the week, with “Nothings are getting started”. Simple yet interesting in a lot of ways. A description that can also be used to describe Femmepop as a whole.

If I was to level a complaint, it would be that there is possibly too much sweetness here. The music is jangly and light. Accompany this with a voice that could ice a cake and you can be put on overload. Despite a hint of rockier influences, there is little edge to be found in Femmepop’s songs. There is nothing wrong with that. We need some light to counteract the shit that is available out there, but I think this is the reason why I probably won’t be coming back for seconds.

The problem is that, and especially with the mission I have set myself with this column, sometimes you can find a musician that you can see is talented, that you can tell is enjoyable, and that you could recommend to someone you know, but just isn’t for you. I don’t connect with Femmepop. I don’t relate. But I know a couple of folks who will, so I’ll be passing her name along. Sorry Margaret, this isn’t personal, but I’m clicking the Deny button on you.

Presentation = 3/5
Content = An EP’s worth of songs but no videos or many pictures.
Music = 4/5
Friend Request = DENIED!

————————————————————————–
musicairplaneTHE AIRPLANE GAME
www.myspace.com/theairplanegame

This six piece band from Reno describe themselves as being rock/breakcore/pop-punk. I have no fucking clue what breakcore is. In fact, I have such little knowledge of it I went and wikipedia’d it. “Breakcore is a style of electronic dance music largely influenced by hardcore techno, drum and bass and industrial music that is characterized by its use of heavy kick drums, breaks and a wide pallet of sampling sources, played at high tempos.” Remember kids, every day is a school day.
There are some good elements to The Airplane Game. The have a great drummer, for one. They play well. I was listening a couple of times while multitasking and my foot did tap along. A good sign indeed. The big picture at the top of their page made me smile. Their guitarist Jessie Gonzales has an excellent paedophile moustache (see John Waters), which is always a winner in my book. “Sign Your Pity” is a good song, although that could just be my penchant for crowd participation sing-a-long parts, which this clearly has.

There are a few things I don’t get, though. Why do they need two vocalists? I can understand when a guitarist or bass player will add vocals, but to have two people who only sing seems… unnecessary. None of the songs I’ve heard sounded like they needed that extra person. I don’t see the merit. Especially when they sound SO much like every other singer in their genre. Why must you whine so? Is it required for this form of rock, or just a coincidence? Also, if you can sing, stop screaming at random intervals.

I can’t really tell the songs apart, either. There are some moments from each song that I really like, especially the breaks that I guess make this “breakcore” (by the way, tomorrow in work I’m going to be taking breakcores all day long, no more tea-breaks for me, it’s tea-breakcoring all the way) but if you asked me which song these moments belonged to I would have to look it up.

I guess I missed the boat with this sort of thing. I realize reading back on all this that I sound like an old fart trying to describe The Airplane Game. I’m only 26, but they make me want to shout “darn kids!” every time.

Either that or they’re shit. You know, for the sake of my self esteem, lets just go with that.

Presentation = 3/5
Content = A video, some songs and not too much ranting about themselves.
Music = 3/5
Friend Request = DENIED!

-If anyone would like to be a part of Aaron’s Musical MySpace Tour just send him a friend request over at www.myspace.com/aaronhbp. Be warned, he’s a cantankerous man and will most likely make fun of you.

January 13, 2010

Contest Round-Up: 2010-01-13

contestheader.jpg

Welcome to our weekly round-up of featured giveaways here at FRED. Every Wednesday, we’ll present a new clutch of DVDs, books, and other cool stuff you can take a shot at winning. All you have to do is click on the graphics below to be taken to their respective contest pages. And good luck!

In conjunction with Sideshow Collectibles, we’re giving away a SHE-HULK Premium Format Figure.

In conjunction with Shout Factory, we’re giving away five (5) copies of KINGDOM OF THE SPIDERS on DVD.

In conjunction with Shout Factory, we’re giving away three (3) copies of THIRTYSOMETHING: SEASON 2 on DVD.

In conjunction with Lionsgate, we’re giving away three (3) copies of GAMER on DVD.

In conjunction with Lionsgate, we’re giving away three (3) copies of WEEDS: SEASON 5 on DVD.

In conjunction with Lionsgate, we’re giving away three (3) copies of SMOKIN’ ACES 2: ASSASSINS’ BALL on DVD, plus SMOKIN’ ACES water bottles.

In conjunction with BBC Home Video, we’re giving away three (3) copies of RETURN TO CRANFORD and one (1) grand prize copy of THE CRANFORD COLLECTION on DVD.

In conjunction with Warner Bros. Home Video, we’re giving away three (3) copies of DALLAS: SEASON 12 on DVD.

In conjunction with Warner Bros. Home Video, we’re giving away three (3) copies of THE WALTONS MOVIE COLLECTION on DVD.

In conjunction with It Books, we’re giving away five (5) copies of HEADS ON AND WE SHOOT: THE MAKING OF WHERE THE WILD THINGS ARE.

In conjunction with Cartoon Network, we’re giving away three (3) copies of BAKUGAN: VOLUME 6 on DVD.

Bagged & Boarded 44: I Love You 1001 Nacht

Filed under: Bagged & Boarded — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:58 am

baggedboardedheader.jpg

What happens when two young men let their love of movies, comic books, and all things “geek” take over their lives? They run away from their families, bringing only the most essential DVDs and comics to their secret, highly fortified underground bunker in sunny Southern California, where they start recording podcasts that will change the world.

Are they heroes?

No.

Are they geniuses?

Far from it.

Are they the future of this planet?

I sure hope not.

Simply put… Matt Cohen and Jesse Rivers are “Bagged and Boarded”.

linesm.gif

BAGGED & BOARDED #44: I Love You 1001 Nacht – In which Matt is joined yet again by special guest Bumpin Fresh and the fellows discuss childhood nicknames, facial hair, and being sexually attracted to amusement park rides. Tickets please!

[CONTENT WARNING]: This podcast may contain some foul language and horribly off-color jokes. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
Episode #44 (MP3 format)

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/baggedboarded/bagged_boarded-44.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

Got something to say? E-mail Matt & Jesse at the B & B mailbag.

line.gif

CLICK HERE FOR THE BAGGED & BOARDED ARCHIVES

line.gif

##

January 12, 2010

Win BAKUGAN: VOLUME 6 on DVD!

Filed under: Contests — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 11:58 pm

contestheader.jpg

In conjunction with Cartoon Network, we’re giving away three (3) copies of BAKUGAN: VOLUME 6 on DVD.

Contest ends at 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, January 27th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of FRED Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

One entry per day, per person.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, January 27th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

Win HEADS ON AND WE SHOOT: THE MAKING OF WHERE THE WILD THINGS ARE!

Filed under: Contests — Tags: , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 10:44 pm

contestheader.jpg

In conjunction with It Books, we’re giving away five (5) copies of HEADS ON AND WE SHOOT: THE MAKING OF WHERE THE WILD THINGS ARE.

Contest ends at 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, January 27th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of FRED Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

One entry per day, per person.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, January 27th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

Win THE WALTONS MOVIE COLLECTION on DVD!

Filed under: Contests — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 10:31 pm

contestheader.jpg

In conjunction with Warner Bros. Home Video, we’re giving away three (3) copies of THE WALTONS MOVIE COLLECTION on DVD.

Contest ends at 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, January 27th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of FRED Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

One entry per day, per person.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, January 27th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

Win DALLAS: SEASON 12 on DVD!

Filed under: Contests — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 10:21 pm

contestheader.jpg

In conjunction with Warner Bros. Home Video, we’re giving away three (3) copies of DALLAS: SEASON 12 on DVD.

Contest ends at 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, January 27th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of FRED Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

One entry per day, per person.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, January 27th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

Win CRANFORD on DVD!

Filed under: Contests — Tags: , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 10:08 pm

contestheader.jpg

In conjunction with BBC Home Video, we’re giving away three (3) copies of RETURN TO CRANFORD and one (1) grand prize copy of THE CRANFORD COLLECTION on DVD.

Contest ends at 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, January 27th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of FRED Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

One entry per day, per person.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, January 27th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

Win SMOKIN’ ACES 2: ASSASSINS’ BALL on DVD!

Filed under: Contests — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 9:04 pm

contestheader.jpg

In conjunction with Lionsgate, we’re giving away three (3) copies of SMOKIN’ ACES 2: ASSASSINS’ BALL on DVD, plus SMOKIN’ ACES water bottles.

Contest ends at 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, January 27th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of FRED Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

One entry per day, per person.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, January 27th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

Win WEEDS: SEASON 5 on DVD!

Filed under: Contests — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 8:46 pm

contestheader.jpg

In conjunction with Lionsgate, we’re giving away three (3) copies of WEEDS: SEASON 5 on DVD.

Contest ends at 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, January 27th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of FRED Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

One entry per day, per person.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, January 27th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

Win GAMER on DVD!

Filed under: Contests — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 8:36 pm

contestheader.jpg

In conjunction with Lionsgate, we’re giving away three (3) copies of GAMER on DVD.

Contest ends at 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, January 27th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of FRED Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

One entry per day, per person.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, January 27th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress