FRED Entertainment

January 19, 2010

Soapbox: Golden Globes, Ricky Gervais, AVATAR, & A Few Other Buzzwords

Filed under: Articles — Tags: , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 7:20 am

soapbox-header.png

Golden Globes, Ricky Gervais, AVATAR, & A Few Other Buzzwords

lucyline.gif

depGolden Globes night. I had just cracked open a cold bottle of Paulaner Hefe-Weizen, while recalling my grandfather’s now-legendary words of wisdom: “Just remember, you can’t drink it all – they’ll always make more.”

Even now, years later, I see no reason to attempt to prove him wrong.

I was primed for this awards ceremony, having seen Ricky Gervais several days prior on The Tonight Show with Conan O’Brien, where the subject of his hosting the Globes was discussed briefly. More importantly, Gervais made it quite clear in his comments to Conan whose side he was on, and he doesn’t strike me as one to pull any punches. Gervais + Pro-Conan Stance + Hosting an awards show on NBC = a recipe for some potentially (unintentionally?) hilarious disaster.

I was in no way disappointed. Gervais made some comments that made me squirm in my seat and laugh nervously, repeatedly finding a welcome distraction in my wheaty beer (I would drink three bottles before the show finally ended). A small sampling of what I mean:

– In his opening bit, Gervais expressed his concern that NBC might suddenly replace him as the host of the awards, and put Leno in his place (adding at one point, “I’m not used to these sort of viewing figures … neither is NBC, for that matter”). This didn’t get unanimous laughter from the star-studded audience. Ricky, Ricky, Ricky… this is a Hollywood audience. Leno’s been around since before Jim Carrey was doing In Living Color, for cripe’s sake – he’s gotta have more than a few friends in this audience. Nervous laughter.

– The original creative power behind The Office, Gervais complained to the audience that everyone thinks Steve Carrell is the brilliant one, as evidenced by the fact that he gets all the movie deals. He referred to the American version of the show as having “jumped the shark” (literally, “Arthur Fonzarellied”), and promoted the British version of the show on DVD. More nervous laughter.

– Gervais spoke of having flown over on the same flight as Sir Paul McCartney (who was nominated for Best Original Song from a Motion Picture), noting that McCartney flew coach because he was “saving money… he spent an awful lot last year.” Jokes about divorce are rarely funny to the person who just experienced one. Still more nervous laughter.

– Before introducing Mel Gibson, Gervais walked on-stage with a beer, admitted to having “had a few”, then delivered the blow: “I like a drink as much as the next man… unless the next man is Mel Gibson.” Then he left the beer on the podium, thus setting up one of the night’s funnier moments, which came, not from the show itself, but from the Twitter stream: Ken Plume (@KenPlume) quipped, “Ricky even left the drink out for Mel. Now THAT’S a good host.”

Which brings me to my next point: I watched this entire event with my Twitter stream flowing, washing gently over me and keeping me informed, in 140-character quips, about what other people wanted to say about the show. It was like watching the whole thing with a room full of friends, who for some reason would only speak in short sentences, and only all at the same time. Oh well. At least I didn’t have to share my beer with them.

The whole live-tweet experience probably colored my perception of the awards show. There were a few genuinely funny moments in the show itself (see McCartney’s quip, “Animation is not just for children, it is also for a-dults who take drugs”), but most of the laughs that came from me, specifically (as opposed to “you”), were prompted by comments from the tweeple I follow. When Mickey Rourke walked on-stage in a too-large-to-be-taken-seriously cowboy hat, Ricky Gervais refused to poke fun at him (“mainly because he has arms as big as my legs”, he explained). Thankfully, Caissie St. Onge (@Caissie) was there to jab, “I love that Mickey Rourke declined to do banter of any kind. You’re not going to get wittier than that hat”, while Tim Siedell (@badbanana) noted, “Not sure Mickey Rourke knows someone put a hat on him as a joke.”

These were the golden moments of the Golden Globes. It gave me a great idea for future ceremonies: live-streaming Twitter feeds, running constantly on a jumbo-tron in the background. Wouldn’t that be awesome? We could sit in the comfort (read: safety) of our own homes and launch our stream-of-consciousness thoughts directly into the audience. I’m betting that would change a few things about the environment and atmosphere of those shows. Granted, Ashton Kutcher (@aplusk) might have to stop tweeting during those events, but I consider that a net win, really.

It also made me wonder: in what other scenarios might this live-tweeting medium prove to be a major enhancement to the event currently being experienced? Sporting events? Movie premiers? Book readings at the local Tea Society? Papal Vespers?

I don’t know. But I think I’m close to discovering something big here. I’ll let you know when I figure out what it is.

(A quick BTW/PS: I know, this post was about the Golden Globes, and I didn’t say anything about which movies won which awards. It doesn’t really matter. Same amount of shockers, upsets, disappointments, complaints, victories, no-kiddings, and they-deserved-its as last year.)

Jacob Michael

Soapbox: FourthMeal, FifthMeal, SixthMeal

Filed under: Articles — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 3:58 am

soapbox-header.png

FourthMeal, FifthMeal, SixthMeal…

lucyline.gif

depI suppose it’s a sad enough commentary on the state of our current culture that, as I prepare to begin this article by stating that I was recently out for a “FourthMeal” run, I realize there is absolutely no need to explain exactly what “FourthMeal” is. Congratulations, Taco Bell – all of those billions of dollars spent on that ridiculous advertising campaign were dollars well-spent; your nasty little slogan is now part of our common vocabulary.

I also wanted to say this: I think the “FourthMeal” branding is incredibly presumptuous. I resent the fact that Taco Bell assumes they know me well enough to make the statement, stamped with a registered trademark no less, that this is my fourth meal of the day. It might only be my third meal of the day, which would explain why I’m running out for fast food at 11:45 PM. Maybe I skipped dinner, and that’s why I’m so desperately hungry that I will actually drive to the nearest Taco Bell and actually order, pay for, and eat their pseudo-Mexi-slop. For that matter, maybe this is my ninth meal of the day. Perhaps I’m shooting for a personal record.

I am somewhat shocked that, these days, nearly every single item available for purchase at Taco Bell comes with a taco on the side. You want a quesadilla combo? That comes with a taco. You want a cheesy bean burrito combo? That, too, comes with a taco. You want a family-size combo-pack of 15 tacos? Here, have a taco with that.

When the time comes for the helpful sales associate to process your order, they are required by Federal Law to ask you, “Would you like a hard or soft taco with that?” This is where I get a bit antsy, as a consumer. I’ve already sat in line at the drive-thru and fearfully, anxiously weighed my menu options for a solid 15 minutes – not because I wanted to wait that long, but because that’s how long it took for this well-oiled, “fast”-food machine to process the order of the guy in front of me. By this point in the chronology of events, I’ve already come to several food-based crossroads, and I’ve moved on: I know which of the fifteen combo meals I want, I know which beverage (regular or diet) I would like to accompany that combo, I know whether I will go with steak, chicken, or beef in my “Supreme” (not “Baja”) Gordita (not Chalupa), I know what size I want, and I know which sauces I want on top of it all.

Do you really need to pressure with this “hard-or-soft-taco” decision now?!

Does it really even matter? We’re talking about the exact same internal contents in either case: some ground beef, a sprinkling of lettuce, a small ration of finely diced tomatoes, exactly seven cheese shavings, and a tiny plop of sour cream (yes, the standard Taco Bell unit of measure for sour cream is indeed the “plop” – look it up). The only difference between the hard or soft taco, then, is the flexibility of the wrapper around the taco-y center. Will it be brittle and dry, or will it be soft and moist? Either way, is it really going to drastically impact the overall enjoyment I will derive from the combo meal as a whole? I strongly doubt it. Do I intend to do anything with this edible taco wrapper that may or may not result in personal injury, based on its durability or texture? Perhaps, but not likely.

So I like to let the helpful sales associate choose for me. That’s one less thing they can screw up (although, I will not be terribly surprised if this one day happens to me). “Hard or soft taco?” “It’s your call, man.” I’m pretty easy going when it comes to my fast-food, precisely because it is just that: fast-food. This isn’t a formal outing, there are no culinary critics involved, and none of the menu items include fancy French sounds (such as words ending in -eaux, or words beginning with D’– or L’-). I didn’t put on a coat and tie for the occasion, nor did I bring a vintage bottle of cabinet reserve to accompany my “FourthMeal”.

On the contrary, I pre-resigned myself to ordering food from a place that actually spent marketing dollars on the concept of a late-night munchie-run. I fully expect the food-product that gets handed to me in a plastic bag through a tiny glass window by a minimum wage associate named “Chip” – food-product that is, I remind you, accompanied by paper-towel napkins and occasionally packaged in a cardboard box – to be heavy on functionality, and light on aesthetics. Put simply: I expect to cram this crap down my gullet in order to quiet the growl in my belly, not to experience taste-bud nirvana.

Which is why I will never understand those people who treat the drive-thru encounter as though it were akin to dining out at the Olive Garden. You know the type: the person who drives up to the little metal ordering-box and asks for the Big Hombre combo (all 38 pieces), grande-sizes the hell out of it, but then demands to have the tomatoes on the side, the sour cream swapped out for ranch dressing, nacho cheese instead of the pepper-jack, no “zowie” sauce, and two empty tortilla shells instead of the baggie of chips.

To this individual, I calmly say: please consider your %$!!@%$! surroundings and do a much-needed reality check. The franchise from which you are currently ordering your late-night sustenance has three large tubs in the back storage area, filled with ground meat-product, cheese-product, and some kind of damp “veggie” mix. The 74 menu items you see are simply a series of variations made up of ingredients drawn from these three tubs, rearranged in inventive ways for marketing purposes. You should consider yourself lucky that they don’t just dump the whole sloppy mess straight into the plastic bag, and hand it over to you with a spork and a friendly “good luck, Señor.”

Now… If you’ll pardon me, I need to go back to Taco Bell and complain. They put jalapeño sauce on my quesadilla and forgot to add fresh onions, again.

-Jacob Michael

Powered by WordPress