Tag: chuck

  • Trailer Park: Zachary Levi – Part 2

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    I was able to sit down for a couple of years and pump out a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

    Check out my new column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

    Departures DVD – Review

    dep

    The fact that this film beat out Waltz with Bashir and The Class at last year’s Academy Awards should be an indication of how good Departures really is. Not saying it should be a sticker on its box cover but it is a compelling fact on top of the one that this is really that good.

    For those who need the CliffsNotes version of the story it is thus: A talented musician/father, Daigo (Masahiro Motoki), takes solace in his music as a professional cellist. When he finds himself in the unemployment line after his orchestra goes bankrupt, with no work and no way to make ends meet, the family packs up and moves back to his hometown where he grew up as a boy. With no prospects for any kind of musical employment Daigo answers an ad to help prepare dead bodies. Hiding the job from his wife, learning what it means to be alive, learning what it means to die, all play into a story that is at the same time satisfying and slightly inspiring.

    Where director Yojiro Takita genuinely excels is crafting a movie that is at once affirming and interesting. This is Daigo’s story, to be sure, but the way in which we navigate the waters of personal grief that never overpowers the notion that this is Daigo’s tale to tell shows how well Takita can back off when he needs to, never pushing a schmaltzy Frank Capra-esque “It’s great to be alive!” kind of agenda. The action is understated and always very aware of itself. Sometimes, it’s too aware and the way in which Daigo finds his own way to enlightenment about his own life, and the many things that have held him back for so many years as an adult, and it is this, I feel, is where the Academy really saw something in this film.

    True, there is nothing new here about the emotional state of mankind that made this an absolute shoo-in to win an Oscar, The Class had a much more direct and profound statement to make, but it is a film that transcends so many boundaries and does get at the inane blocks we sometimes place on ourselves. The movie is great because it doesn’t get bogged down with the superfluous but it also misses an opportunity to delve deeper into the emotional core of our character; while we see a lot of ourselves in this film, you understand, there should have been more we see of Daigo’s own transformation. There is no way you can go wrong with a viewing of this film and more than deserves a few of your rental dollars. What it has to say and show about death, mortality, and the unique preparation of our corporeal bodies, is enough to warrant a couple of hours of your time here on earth.

    Zachary Levi – Interview- Part 2

    It’s hard to look into the future when it comes to broadcasting but Zach Levi knows enough that it could be mistaken for yet another one of Chuck’s skills. Star of the program that bears his likeness in so many promos that you wonder whether the network is trading in the peacock for his delicate mug, Levi has a lot to say when it comes to reflecting on the previous seasons of the show. As well, he’s more than an open book to discuss what happens when the very same network pushing your show on the viewers of the channel whacks your budget and the effects it has on those who act in it. There was more than enough of the Straight Talk Express to go around and Levi let loose, literally not letting me get a word in edgewise. When last we left off with Levi, he was explaining what happened when he visited jolly ol’ England to talk about the show months ago, on the verge of cancellation, and ended up becoming a Sandwich Artist for the day.

    Chuck is now back to its normal time on Monday, 8/7C on NBC

    chuck1LEVI: So it was right around the corner from where the convention was and Adam and I had a panel on Saturday. We already talked about Chuck and we were supposed to have another panel with another actor who didn’t end up making the convention so it was just going to be me.  And I said I didn’t want to just sit up there and say the same things so I said, “Hey, instead of me just talking, who wants to go walk over to Subway and have some sandwiches?”

    And, literally, almost everyone at the convention got up and went over to Subway.

    Then we got over there and I ordered a sandwich and the people at Subway said, “Would you like to come back and make it a photo op and make a sandwich?”  So I said “Yeah” and I went back behind the counter and made a sandwich and I was in the middle of the production line, bur I ended up making about 250 sandwiches.  It was so surreal.  I’m in a Subway, in England, with a bunch of my fellow nerds at a convention that is part of this grassroots campaign, people I’ve never seen before, and here we are.  And then that got traction and it went out to everybody at Warner Bros. and NBC and I just don’t know, man.

    It’s a unique and special thing to be a part of and I feel like later in my career I hope to be a part of something that special ““ be a part of things that are so symbiotic with the fans ““ the people that means the most too.  You can be out there and make great stuff and good movies and all that but to be in the trenches with them ““ to see if a miracle does happen ““ and it did happen.

    CS:  It did.  I can’t imagine what that did for you knowing that this was all going on and your job was in the balance publicly.  If I was about to get fired and everyone knew about it, I don’t know how I would hold myself together.  It must be a unique position for you. But now that you have your third season, do you have an idea of where this third season is going to go when you kick back up again?  Was there always a third season tentatively written?

    LEVI: I am sure that they had ideas and a good idea of the overall premise of where the third season would go.  But, when the future is that uncertain, I don’t know how much time as a writer, and I am, but I’ve never been in their particular shoes, where it’s like, “OK we have two seasons under our belts.  How much time are we going to dedicate to cracking stories?”  It could be all for naught, you know?  But I know that certainly the second season was left as a cliff hanger.  The second season I download the new intersect 2.0 and at least temporarily have kung-fu and that’s the last line.  I know kung-fu and we’re out.  You just can’t “¦Everybody was, “Oh my god, what the heck is going on?”  It’s crazy.  And because Chuck, why it’s a special show for the Comic-Con crowd is because Chuck is the Comic-Con goer.  If you look in our art department, my room is litered with Comi-Con badges by my desk.  So I feel the fun of the show is that they get to live vicariously through Chuck and vicariously they get to learn kung-fu as we go into the third season you find out that these powers are fleeting.  The intersect has its glitches.  It was not meant for me.  It was meant for Bryce Larkin who is already a super secret agent and is cool…so I don’t have the capability to turn it on and off.

    Whether it’s fighting skills or speaking another language or playing an instrument or operating machinery, whatever the case may be, it’s all these physical attributes that Chuck now has the power to tap into but they only last for a certain amount of time and so we’ll get some great action out of it but then at the same time there will be some great comedy because of those moments where, for example, we’re on a mission and a couple of big baddies step up and I say “Guys, I got this” and I strike my pose but nothing is happening and these guys are coming to beat the crap out of me or something like that.  It is certainly not at will, kind of happens as it does, and it’s perfect because if I could just retain kung-fu the show wouldn’t make any sense anymore.  I have to be the everyman.

    If I, all of a sudden, could protect myself, Casey and Sarah, we wouldn’t need them anymore.  I would just be a secret agent.  I wouldn’t have a home life anymore, so there goes my sister and Awesome and Morgan and everybody.  But this way we’ve opened this new door of all these possibilities and Josh and Chris and the rest of our writers have done an excellent job of setting up that world and now in the third season they are just going to dive into it.  I’m sure they have all kind of fun ideas.

    CS:  Exactly.  Going back to the idea that fans…when you are out talking and people are talking to you, why do so many people, in your opinion, embrace the show and feel like it’s their show?  What is it about it that people really want to protect?

    Zachary LeviLEVI: I think that A) it is the element that Chuck is one of them and I feel partly that like Josh and I, we are Chuck and Morgan, not entirely, but when we say we’re gamers, we are genuine gamers.  And I think that there is an honesty that comes through in that and that’s not a pat on our back by any means but certainly I feel like the audience feels less duped.  I feel like they get to watch the characters and feel like that these guys are like that too.  They are on Xbox and like comic books ““ so on a personal level I think they are invested in us too which I think is a really awesome thing.  But then on top of that I think it’s an entertaining show and speaks to the fanboy and fangirl.  We nod to and allude to, not rip off”¦

    (Laughs)

    But certainly a homage to so many of the classic either spy movies, sci-fi movies or fantasy, we’re like Sandworm from Dune, whatever.  We have great guest stars that are all from that world, or many of them are.  Like Scott Bakula playing my dad, that’s huge, or Trisha Helfer came on and played an agent on the show.  Any bit that we give I feel it’s our duty to do that because I think it’s staying true to our fan base ““ gives them more reason to stay with it.  Then, on top of that, aside from the fanboy/fangirl Comic-Con world, paired with that the show itself has a really big family audience because we’re an 8:00 o’clock show so you can’t do too much that’s too risqué, although some of the lingerie”¦ But one of the coolest things I’ve gotten out of this whole experience on Chuck is how many parents have come up to me for 3 years now, or 2 going into our 3rd, just saying, “Thank you.  Thank you that you have given me and my kids an hour of television that we get to sit down and hang out together and we watch the show and we all dig it.  We all dig it for different reasons.  My son loves the action and we love the whole spy world stuff.  It’s so silly and fun.”  Or some moms say, “I think Alan Baldwin is the sexist man alive.”  Whatever.

    And a lot of gamers are really into the Chuck Morgan stuff hoping that we get to bring that bromance and best buddy stuff back and just speaking to the nerds and speaking to everybody with the multi-genre thing, we are a cornucopia of genre which is very difficult to balance and, quite frankly, a pain in the ass sometimes, but that’s what makes the show unique.  There is nothing like Chuck on television.  There’s just nothing like it.  And that’s not necessarily a good thing it’s just ““ it is.  It’s a mini movie every week and we speak to genre people and we speak to sci-fi people and we speak to gamers and nerds and speak to families and even the guy/guys out there who say the girls are, “So hot on your show.”  I think it’s all that stuff…We get these people and get a lot of them.  I think we get a lot of different people and get a little bit of everybody and it makes it a very kind of different and dynamic show.  And, on top of all of that, I think the reason why people are with us and stay with us and are invested in the show is because now they have genuinely become a part of our survival and our livelihood.  They are the crucial part of why we are still around and I think it’s the best kind of situation you can be a part of because you know that it’s worth something at the end of the day.

    I love acting.  I love what I get to do.  I hope I get to do it for the rest of my life but certainly there are many, many times where I’m doing it and saying, “Does this really mean anything? ” There are guys and girls overseas defending our freedoms abroad.  Those guys are putting their lives on the line.  That means something.  Or Caltrans guys working on the sides of the roads keeping the freeways going, those jobs do something.  I’m an entertainer.  What does that mean at the end of the day?  But, for an hour a week, you bring a smile to somebody’s face and it’s not just a smile.  It’s a smile that is rooted so deeply and they are willing to offer up their time and energy to keep it going because they want that smile or they want those tears in those dramatic moments we have.  They want that adrenaline in those action packed moments.

    This whole weekend, especially today after our panel, it’s just humbling.  Everything has been very humbling.  It certainly gives me a renewed appreciation for what we do and I want to be able to just keep this going and carry that to the next 13 episodes and just make them awesome and keep giving the fans what they want.

    CS:  Going into the 3rd season, knowing how number 2 turned out, fate being what it is with the show, does Chuck need to change in order to stay afloat?

    0000043360_20070924122705LEVI: We’ve already seen some changes and those changes have all been kind of monetary, budget restricting changes which is across the board, really.  Some shows didn’t come back at all because they just couldn’t work it on with the budget or they were already on season 7 and it’s like…look, Without a Trace for example was in the top 10 shows or something and it didn’t come back.  That was making huge numbers and far bigger numbers than us.  So across the board, studios, networks, everybody feels it so I, as tough as it is sometimes, would be like, “Come on, give us a little bit of love.”

    I know that sometimes the buck just gets passed and passed and passed and it just has to be.  So we’ve seen that already. Take Josh Gomez, he was in all the shows produced and now it’s 11 of 13.  So he’s not in every episode but he’s going to be in the majority of the episodes.  I think Adam, Yvonne, and I are the only ones all shows produced.  And that’s a bummer.  When the show first started to me it was like, it’s Chuck torn between his family life and his new spy life.  It was Adam and Yvonne on this side and it was Josh and Sarah on this side.  So to see somebody come and get demoted, if you will, that bums me out for Josh.  Not just for his pocketbook, although you do feel that, obviously.  But just kind of on a that’s just sucks.  Not fun news to hear.  But, Julia Ling, who played Anna Wu, she’s not on the show at all.  And I know they have reached out to her and said “We’d like for you to come back and guest star” but she might have other things she’s working on.  I don’t know.  So that kind of stuff is tough.

    Our overall budget has been cut half a million dollars.  And we were already in a place where getting the job done where we were was tough in the time and money we had allotted.  Now we lost a day on our schedule and we lost a good portion of our budget so it’ll be interesting.  I don’t know how but I believe that it can, I know we will.  There is no turning back.  We have 13 episodes to do and this is the money we have to do it.

    You just have to have faith that whatever is meant to be is meant to be and we will still be able to produce the show if fans are with.  And at the end of the day, I don’t think we’ll lose fans because we didn’t go to a location necessarily.

    LEVI: You lose people when you stop being true to the characters.  And stop being true to the relationships.  And stop being true to what the heart is all about.  And I think also because our fans are now so very in on ““ pretty much everybody knows that we lost money in the budget, Josh Schwartz was in today talking about it at the panel.  We had budget cuts and blah blah blah so I think fans will give you a pass.  As long as it doesn’t look like it was shot on a camcorder.

    (Laughs)

    And as long as everybody stays true to the heart of what the show is about and we’re still doing everything we can to make it the best show we can.  I think they will stay with us.  I don’t think they’d come this far and then say, “Ah, whatever.”Â  Look at a show like Heroes.  Yes, they slipped a little bit in their numbers but they went through some rocky times.  The first season it was the biggest thing in the world.  And then it wasn’t exactly the show people loved the first season.  It was different.  Some people thought “I don’t know, I like this version more” and they tried to come back in the third season and now a fourth season and they still have a full packed hall at Comic-Con.  So, the dedicated fans will stay.  They invested that time.

    chuck_nbc_tv_show_image_zachary_levi_and_yvonne_strahovskiI am a huge fan of Lost.  And when they hit ““ I thought second season was fantastic.  The first half of the third season, had maybe writer changes, but you are not getting the mythology, not getting questions answered, just more and more questions, but not questions at all, just day to day living and I’m like, “Come on, what’s going on?’  And then they went on hiatus and came back and the second half of the third season was some of the best television I ever saw in my entire life.  I was like, “YES, here’s my show.”  And I felt good because I didn’t give up, I could have, but I didn’t and you feel good that you stayed and it’s still to me the best show on TV.  I love Lost.  I can’t wait to find out what’s going to happen.  I’m dying.

    CS:  Last question:  You’ve been a very public face for Chuck.  Why have you taken such an active role in coming out and stumping and being who you are regarding Chuck’s fate in the public sphere. What part of your personality does that come from?

    LEVI: Thank you.  I appreciate that.  I think it’s a couple of things.

    I think A) it’s just the way God made me but, hey, everybody’s got different things.  Some people ““ I don’t fault anybody for not – people have different personalities and I’ve always been an outgoing gregarious guy anyway.  But I feel it’s a particular paradigm from the beginning of when I started my career ““ and it’s funny because I was just talking to somebody about this today but again I don’t fault anybody because we’re all different ““ some artists are very close and they are just more introverted types of people or something and that’s them and that’s cool and rock and roll.  I feel like some people their philosophy on the business is the less you give the more they want so they hold back.  You don’t know anything about Johnny Depp so you want to more about Johnny Depp.  I don’t even know if that’s who Johnny Depp is but he’s a mysterious kind of guy.

    But it really started with the first show I did, Less than Perfect.  Somebody I was talking to said “You shouldn’t really open up too much to fans because the more you give the less they’ll want” or something.  I was new and I thought about it for a second and thought, “Whatever.”  But for me, if I can just maintain ,for multiple reasons,  as a regular person, that’s the most I can do.  Who knows?  In 20 years,  if I continue to be blessed and I continue to work and do good things and my star rises, if you will, and it gets really nutty so that I can’t even walk on the floor at Comic-Con without getting attacked or something, things happen and you have to start making boundaries so you don’t die.  But, until then, I say be you.  Take every opportunity that you can to thank people and be there with them.  Honestly, I feel like any opportunity that you can share a bit of you you can gain a support for your whole career.  Not that you do it for that reason but the reason behind it is because you know how much they care.  You know how much it means to them.

    Somebody could be having the worst day of their life but they see you ““ I can see someone on the floor at Comic-Con and they tried to go talk to so-and-so or they don’t have enough money to go buy the comic they wanted and they are just kind of moping around, and all of a sudden they look up and they say “Hey, you’re Chuck. Can I take a picture?” and I say “Yeah, whatever, I’ll take a picture with you” and for the rest of the weekend they are on Cloud Nine”¦or maybe not”¦they could be saying, “Oh, burn it!”

    (Laughs)

    You don’t know.  But I feel like until you have to build walls I think it’s the wrong way to go.  And, again, you have to be careful.  People do want a lot from you and some people don’t know where that’s it’s OK to stop.  And fortunately I have friends and family around me that will be there for me and give me a little tap on the shoulder like, “Hey, we got to go because we’ll be here forever.”

    I don’t know.  It’s just my philosophy.  You take things as they come.  I mean, I’m in the UK with a Subway around the corner, and Wendy, who started the campaign to save the show, is there. “What are you going to do for the finale tomorrow?” she asked. I responded, “Guess I’ll go to Subway and ask if anyone wants to go.”  But if that didn’t happen…maybe there was no Subway around the corner…maybe Wendy wasn’t there.  Then it probably wouldn’t have happened.  I don’t know.  But I just think you have to be open to what can be done or what should be done.  In that particular moment, you take it moment by moment sometimes and just try to be as honest and as real and hopefully as loving as you can.

    No matter what, even if the show didn’t get picked up, I feel like it was still the right thing to do.

  • Trailer Park: Zachary Levi – Part 1

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    I was able to sit down for a couple of years and pump out a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

    Check out my new column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

    bitch_slap_posterBitch Slap – Giveaway

    When I was at Comic-Con a year and a half ago I can remember this being one of the most memorable interviews I ever conducted. I say conducted as I think conduct was what in order when I was told that the interview I was about to participate in was going to happen in bed.

    Sure, you get that sinking feeling when you’re faced with having a conversation with three really lovely women about a movie that is being talked about with the kind of delight the film no doubt was going for. Part pulp, part exploitation, and all fun I don’t believe this movie will require you to do anything more than just enjoy the spoils of their labor.

    To that end, and to celebrate the film’s debut today in theaters and on VOD, January 8th.

    I’ve got a SIGNED Bitch Slap poster sporting the signatures of  Julia Voth, America Olivo, Erin Cummings, Kevin Sorbo and Zoe Bell, a SIGNED mini-sheet poster (just the girls), one unsigned poster and the full BITCH SLAP 11 card collectible set.

    If you’re feeling randy just shoot me a line at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com and I’ll enter you to win one of these prizes. And if you’re still unsure if this movie’s right for you just read the following synopsis:

    Bitch Slap is a post-modern, thinking man’s throwback to the “B” Movie/Exploitation films of the 1950’s – 70’s as well as a loving, sly parody of the same.  Inspired by the likes of Dragstrip Girl;, Faster Pussycat, Kill, Kill; Kung Fu Nun and the pantheon of Blaxploitation films, Bitch Slap will mix girls, guns, outrageous action and jaw-dropping visuals with a message”¦ don’t be naughty!

    At its core, Bitch Slap follows three bad girls (a down-and-out stripper, a drug-running killer and a corporate powerbroker) as they arrive at a remote desert hideaway to extort and steal $200 Million in diamonds from a ruthless underworld kingpin.  Things quickly spin out of control as allegiances change, truths are revealed, other criminals arrive for the score, the fate of the world hangs in the balance and they are forced to confront a villain much worse than they ever expected”¦ themselves.  It’s the ultimate morality tale as, one by one, they realize the whole she-bang was a set-up and one of them may not even be human…

    What also makes Bitch Slap different is a complicated “B” story device that runs throughout the film to illuminate character, backstory and relationship histories not previously revealed.  Like the film Memento, these scene flashbacks take place in reverse, so by the end of the film, you have a wholly different take on who these women are and why they are behaving so badly.  Bet you never saw THAT in Jailbait Babysitter!

    So grab your popcorn and fasten your safety belt.  With “Cult Classic” written all over it, Bitch Slap is gonna be one wild ride”¦

    Freestyle, IM Global and Epic Slap will premiere BITCH SLAP in theaters and VOD January 8, 2010

    YOUTH IN REVOLT / LEAP YEAR – Review

    leapOne insult after another with nary a punchline to be found.

    What’s astounding about Leap Year, the latest in a long line of painful movies where we are to believe that a woman has mistakenly thought the love of her life is the man she’s with but that it’s not until they meet a strapping, charismatic man before they forsake everything they’ve built in their lives just to be with a stranger they invariably know for a relatively short period of time. It’s an insult to an audience to try and sell an idea that a woman (played by the usually charming Amy Adams) who is willing to fly, on her own accord, to Ireland in order to ask her boyfriend to marry her in a leap year in an act that seems passionate and kind and romantic and incredible yet manages to fall out of love with that man. It defies all rationality to think how a woman could do this yet Anand Tucker tries to sell a comedy that just seems sad, pathetic, and speaks ill of a heroine who just comes off as easily impressionable and just plain, well, easy.

    Through a series of situations which exist and play out in farcical fashion, one such moment involves Adams indiscriminately destroying the world’s smallest hotel room and shoehorning a piece of a sub-plot which is there, I assume, to help those who have difficulty with pesky subtly and nuance, we are to trust in this tale of love that wasn’t meant to be yet obviously will.

    The logistics that this movie defies is truly astounding and noteworthy. After not being able to find a rental car, in what I can only believe is some remote outpost of humanity but  exists mere hours away from a bustling metropolis of Dublin, Matthew Goode, who plays his one note character as best as one could expect, becomes the de facto transporter although he really, truly, doesn’t want to. The level of stupidity this script shows in its obviousness staggers the mind.

    Love abounds, as it usually does, after a series of unbelievable moments that involve a wrecked car, stolen luggage, missed trains, an outdoor wedding reception (I thought this was February in Ireland), a forced kiss that betrays Adams’ purpose in the first place, and through tiny moments of revelation that show just how right these two are for one another when, in fact, it feels like how it would happen in a fairytale. At one point, after Adams seems trapped in a Bermuda Triangle when trying to find some mode of transport that will just get her to Dublin, she buys a ticket for a train that will take her there. She’s had enough of Goode, as is usually the case with a woman who feels she is being weighted down with a fop , and sits on the train’s platform. The train, we’re told, will take more than two hours to get to the station. Goode motions to Adams in taking a walk to the ruins of a castle where he can extemporaneously talk about the mythical history of the runs and, by proxy, explain how this story will end with the two of them together. Won’t take more than fifteen minutes, he says. She relents, goes, listens to the story, and, wouldn’t you know it, the train shows up. Running will do no good here, as would be the logical deduction that we just told the train wouldn’t be there for two plus hours, and there is nary an explanation as to what worm hole that train appeared from or what just happened. Compound this moment a dozen or so times and you’ve got yourself Leap Year.

    How can Adams walk around Ireland at the end of February wearing nothing but a dress, high heels and a light overcoat with no problem at all? How can a dog bark without moving its head? Why on earth would she strip nude and shower in front of a stranger? How could she demolish a rented room without once noticing the detritus falling around her and stopping?  Your logic is no good here as you’d be a fool for trying to piece together the broken shards of this film.

    Much like Gavin Hood straying from what he seemed to be strongest at, creating emotionally charged and deeply affective films, and instead deciding to craft a prosaic movie about a mutant with metal coming out of his hands, Tucker seems to want this kind of career pathing. This movie suffers from the kind of inane traps that plague bad romantic comedies but it’s ironic in that the movie engenders neither romance nor comedy. Sure, we are given situations where comedy is supposed to flourish, Adams finds herself blowing out a small village’s power supply after trying to plug in her BlackBerry, she accidentally destroys her guide’s car, she muddies herself after tumbling down a muddy mountain, but it’s all very ham fisted even by romantic comedy standards.

    Much is made for fires and the one thing you would grab should you find your home engulfed in them. The importance of this is stressed like a mantra that is repeated over and over again in an effort, I am to believe, to make sure you absolutely positively get that this will be important later. At one point Adams’ great epiphany comes when she thinks about pulling the fire alarm in her posh new apartment after we learn that Scott only proposed marriage after finding out that the only way for them to get into the uber exclusive tenement, which required an interview with a committee at the beginning of the film, was to feign being married or at least on the road to it. Scott obviously comes off as the typical bad boyfriend who only cares about materialism, the fire alarm shows how he only wants to save his electronics (Gasp! He must not love her and must only worship false, electronic deities!), and the scene ultimately shows how bad the script written by Deborah Kaplan and Harry Elfont actually is. To wit, the writing team who brought us Made of Honor, Surviving Christmas, Josie and the Pussycats, and The Flintstones in Viva Rock Vegas obviously feel comfortable with keeping expectations low as any movie that wants us to trust in their ability to give audiences something entertaining only end up failing, once again, to think this is anything but a movie for simple-minded bumpkins who don’t realize they’re being insulted.

    youthYouth In Revolt, in contrast, only suffers from being too well-written.

    Director Miguel Arteta ought to be praised for his ability to bring one of the best novels about adolescent lust gone wretchedly wrong in every way, the visual character he brought to Chuck & Buck and Star Maps is here in its essence, but there is a fundamental issue that hobbles this film from being the teenage classic it could be. It’s the expediency with which events transpire and then expire from the movie that only serves to confuse viewers who aren’t familiar with the life and times of Nick Twisp (Michael Cera) as he pursues the girl of his dreams, Sheeni Saunders (Portia Doubleday), but the story is rife with comedic possibilities and the handling of the things that made the book wonderful only feel rushed here.

    Writer Gustin Nash‘s hand feels present in every scene as we go from plot device to plot device, we aren’t allowed to let the story breathe on its own, as if Nash wanted to be sure to include as many bits as he could from the book in order to remain faithful to it. Who could blame him, at almost 500 pages there is an inordinate amount of laughs to be found within the pages as writer C.D. Payne developed this over sexed and overly intelligent protagonist with the flourish of a great storyteller, for wanting to do so but the result is a greatest-hits compilation of scenes that sometimes feel jarring as a viewer.

    This isn’t to say the film is bad. Far from it. It’s perhaps one of the frankest explorations of what “good” young men have to do in order to satiate that side of themselves which, here, makes for good comedy. Nick is deftly played by Michael Cera, who is able to carry not only the meek personality which seems to come naturally to the actor but is able to transform into his daring alter ego, François Dillinger, with gentle ease. It’s Dillinger who had the greatest opportunity and latitude to go for the laughs in this movie and he does so with gusto. As he compels Nick to do what he is unwilling to do on his own, Cera morphs from a smart, frustrated boy into the kind of man we have never seen before on camera. You believe Cera is capable of the destruction and perversion he partakes in simply by playing off of himself with charisma and aplomb. From suggestive remarks about violating the body of his girlfriend, to possessing the affectations of an English speaking Frenchman with a pathological bent, the film is a delight when these two share the camera.

    As well, Adhir Kalyan, who plays Nick’s friend Vijay Joshi, is a superb compliment to Cera as the two of them feed off one another in the kind of patois this film excels at when it’s not speeding through scenes. Again, we are briefly shown how these two become friends and aren’t really allowed to appreciate how vital Vijay is to what becomes one of the movie’s best set pieces. As an aside, I wish we would see more of Adhir as he’s more than competent to jostle with Cera for laughs on screen. However, a lot of the issues regarding this movie’s quick pace, however, stem from this movie’s first act.

    Adapting the novel seemed too much for Nash as what we get in the first third of this movie is a lot of rushing. We move from one moment to the next, inserting pithy scenes from the book to fit the moment, without ever delving into the characters of the book or the implication of what it means in the grand scheme of things. It not only implicitly casts a pall on a book that is packed with pure comedy but, explicitly, it has the effect of cheapening this movie’s intent which is to show how one pervy boy with a pathological streak manipulates those around him. To wit, Zach Galifianakis plays one of Nick’s mom’s boyfriends. He is introduced, used for a few scenes, and is crumpled up just as quickly as he came on the screen like a piece of detritus that needs to be swept away in order to make room for other characters. This is the case for the rest of the movie, characters coming and going in order to introduce everyone in this book’s universe, along with their strange proclivities. Zach feels there almost in a utilitarian capacity as he’s the driving force to get Nick out of town so he can meet Sheeni, he’s the one who buys the camper that ultimately meets a fiery finish, and he conveniently meets his demise just at the right time in order to progress the journey. There’s nothing wrong with making every moment contribute to the whole, and for there to be reasons why something is in a movie, but the end result is mass confusion as these contrivances just make everything feel too convenient, too pat.

    The issue that this movie never deals with, then, is why Nick and Sheeni are willing to go back and forth with this relationship. We know Nick’s reason for sure but it doesn’t ever feel genuine and it certainly doesn’t earn its ending which feels rushed and shoehorned in as if someone happened to look at their watch to see that the movie was about to break 90 minutes. We ought to feel the penultimate moment these two kids share is well-deserved but the way in which they finally consummate their relationship just doesn’t work.

    It’s sad that the relationship that could have spoken to so many pent-up and sexually frustrated boys everywhere is relegated to the backseat of a movie that seems determined to drive the shortest route between two points instead of taking the longer, more scenic route. The result is a movie that certainly could have detailed the life of this young man on the road to finally getting some but it’s a journey that speeds by too fast to appreciate how we got there.

    Zachary Levi of Chuck – Interview

    I’m used to interviewing celebrities one time. Many of the times they’re enjoyable, sometimes they’re fantastic, and some other times are completely awful. It’s the latter ones where I secretly wish their career commits seppuku just to ensure I never even remotely have the chance to talk to them again.

    Zachary Levi is a special case in that I have talked to him a handful of times and every time, absolutely every time, he’s just a kind, open, honest, naturally funny guy who doesn’t put up a superficial front and genuinely thinks about answers before he gives them. He also likes to talk. A lot. That’s really fine for me as when we had a chance to spend a long conversation talking about Chuck’s near demise and the future of network television in general last summer at Comic-Con there was a sense of calm with the actor about all the hullabaloo surrounding the show’s direction. He was passionate when talking about the effort a lot of fans put into making the public aware of the precarious position the show found itself in as it closed out it’s second season. So passionate was Levi about rolling up his shirt sleeves to save the show, Levi literally rolled up his shirt sleeves. Making sandwiches at Subway, coinciding with the series finale, it was a clever sponsorship drive that asked fans to purchase subs, writing a comment or two about how much they wanted the show to stay on the air, Levi didn’t let this oft abused rallying cry on the Internet to save yet another show go unnoticed.

    It was this kind of effort, small as it may have been, that speaks volumes about the man who goes into work and gets to play a secret agent on TV every week.There is no affectation when he speaks, it’s just a guy talking about a career who’s just thankful to have one. It doesn’t seem like a lot but it’s conversations like this that remind me how much better interviews could be if people were just more, well, human.

    Chuck is indeed back for its third season starting this Sunday night with a two-hour season premiere at 9/8c before returning to its regular night and time, January 11th at 8/7c.

    chuckCS:  One of the things that marked this year, this season, for Chuck was the number of people who came out wanting to be sure the show was saved from the network chopping block.  What was your take on how that swell started?  I know a lot of people in your position would say “There’s nothing we can do about it” but what was it like to have all those people come out and say, “Please save the show?”

    LEVI: It certainly gives you an appreciation of what you do.  Being a working actor and getting to do what I love to do is already awesome.    For the most part, no matter what you do somebody out there likes it and somebody out there will find you at some point and say “Hey, I love your work” even if it’s a horrible piece of crap, which is sometimes the case…

    (Laughs)

    But, with this I think we’ve collectively all been pretty proud of what we’ve accomplished ““ what we continue to accomplish.  So on top of just that and appreciating it that way and knowing that your fan base, your core demographic fan base which is ““ we live and die by Comic-Con ““ because Chuck would be here.  Chuck would be at the Chuck panel ““ which would be a very out of body experience.  Wait a minute?  That’s me!

    CS:  There are hotel keys with your face on it”¦

    LEVI:  I know man.  That has been that way for three years now.  Warner Bros. has done a great job at doing that.  All those little things certainly help.  I remember when Jerico was about to get canceled the first time and all the fans went crazy and they worked in unison and sent tons of peanuts to CBS and it worked.  It got 13 more episodes for Jerico.  But I feel like what’s happened is kind of like ““ and I’ve never seen it happen like this before ““ where a fan really had a kind of moment of genius – when some people sent Nerds, those little candy Nerds, to NBC which is all effective in some way because they are passionate fans, but at the end of the day it doesn’t change the problem.  It doesn’t solve the problem.

    The problem is television is failing.

    The formula doesn’t work anymore.  Back in the day you had 3 options.  CBS, NBC, and ABC and there was no cable, no DVR’s, no Internet, so if you were going to be home, which a lot of people were on any given night, Nielsen’s worked.  You could see a cross section there. 70% of the audience is going to be watching the Cheers finale and they have to watch the commercials through and in that way you could offer free entertainment like that.  You could force commercials down people’s throats but you can’t do that anymore.  So more and more people, especially audiences of a show like Chuck that are tech savy, are watching it online.  They are watching it on DVR and so, as much as I think they like to think that that still counts. It actually doesn’t. Even networks and studios say “Well, every little bit helps” but they know it doesn’t really work out that way.  Because, at the end of the day, advertisers are only looking at the live numbers.  They need to know if we spend this amount of money on advertising, who’s actually seeing those commercials.  And live numbers are the only ones that count.  Really.

    So, it makes it very difficult.  The roundabout way of getting to our very dedicated fans, Wendy Farrington, a smart cool chick, she was watching the show one night and worried about the show getting canceled because that was the word on the street that it was on the chopping block. And she saw one of the scenes where Big Mike is chopping away on a Subway sandwich and thought, “If we can get enough fans to actually patronize one of the main sponsors, actually spending money that directly connects to, it’s not just wasting your money on peanuts or Nerds and making some statement.  “So what if we’re not watching the commercials.  We know who is behind the show and we will spend money and buy their product?”  So she came up with this idea, wrote it up, came up with a mission statement and that got picked up virally basically by everybody.  Some of my fan sites asked for my take on it and I told them what I’m telling you, that I think it’s a fantastic idea.  It’s a real idea and not just people swarming their fists around saying, “No, no, please don’t.”  We get it.

    zachary-levi-meb2009The rubber has got to meet the road somewhere.  And so that, mixed with a couple other variables, allowed us to come back for a 3rd season.  I think it’s really kind of blazed a trail and I think if network television is going to survive in this new DVR, internet, downloadable world, why not like that?  Why not just have one main sponsor and harken back to what TV used to be?  How about Borax? I don’t know.  But as long as it’s an easily consumable product. Unfortunately for car makers, you can’t be a Toyota and hope that people will go buy a Civic, or a Celica, I mean.  All of that combined to create a perfect storm of this is really happening.  It was weird because at first your pride takes a hold a little bit.  You think, “Why aren’t we picked up?  We are a good show and critics like us, a lot of critics love us, our fans love us, and yes, we only do 7 million live but there’s a number 5 if you count all the DVRs and download and DVD purchases.  That’s a lot of people.  Right?”

    So, at first I was a little bummed.  I thought it just sucked that this show gets picked up right away and this show is back and we’re still waiting and hanging on but as we went through this whole process what I realized is A) it gave me an appreciation for what we do, like I was saying because it’s humbling especially today.  Being out there in front of a packed hall of 4,000 fans that are dedicated to the show and that’s just a sampling because there are people that stood in line but couldn’t make it into the room and what we do impacts them in some way enough for them to be there with us today and it’s really, really, really humbling and to be here at Comic-Con because we live and die by these very fans that joined the cause and picked up the torch or whatever analogy or metaphor ““ it’s only right that whatever time we can spend with them to say, “Thank you.  I only have a job today because you guys cared enough to Tweet about it or blog about it or emailed it to other friends.”

    We also have fans that just bug the heck out of their families and friends ““ check out Chuck ““ did you see Chuck? ““ Chuck, Chuck, Chuck, you know?

    (Laughs)

    LEVI: I was telling a reporter and the lady from the Chicago Tribune ““ and people like yourself ““ anyone in the media who through all that and before we went on the chopping block, during the season we’ve gotten a lot of love and I’m sure their viewers were saying, “OK, enough of this freakin’ Chuck ““ I get it, you like the show, OK.”  But they are constantly plugging the show and constantly giving us love.  So I really feel that, not that we are the first to stick around because of that kind of love ““ Arrested Development stuck around because of critical acclaim and a dedicated fan base, and winning a couple of trophies didn’t hurt – but even despite that it wasn’t enough for Fox to keep them around, so three seasons and then it was done.  And there are people that still today say, “How could they possible do that?  It was the best show on television.”  And it was.  It was an incredible show but it was ahead of it’s time I think.  And being ahead of your time isn’t always the best thing because audiences still hadn’t caught on to the single camera comedy in that way.  Scrubs has stayed around and weathered some storms and now it’s going to keep going and I’m sure there are fans that are really happy about that.  Then also, so through the process I went from being like that really sucks that we weren’t renewed to seeing all the outcry and outpouring of the love of our fan base and the critics because everybody picked it up: Entertainment Weekly, and E, and TV Guide, and People.  The show that might go away”¦it’s Chuck.  And then I realized that we are getting lots of free press out of this.  This is really good.  And then you start to think about it in the bigger scheme of things like stuff that only later on in hindsight ““ you think clearly God had a bigger plan than all this because now this is keeping us fresh in people’s minds because we are not going to be on the air again until March 1st possibly and that’s all I know.

    CS:  That’s like another writers strike.

    LEVI: Yes.  Fortunately it won’t be that long until we go back to work but nonetheless, that’s a long time off the air.  We certainly benefited tremendously from not being quietly renewed in the night.  We fought for it.  Our fans fought for it.  Our critical fans fought for it and we’re back.  And, I feel like because of that, now it’s almost like our fans are part owners of the show.  They are all shareholders.  “Yeah, we fought for that and we got that back.”  It wasn’t just because the numbers were so great that 15 million people are watching it and of course you are going to get renewed.  No man, it was the strong, the proud, the Marines”¦

    (Laughs)

    LEVI: And nerds everywhere.  When I was in the UK right before the finale I was in Birmingham ““ Adam Baldwin and I were at a Comi-Con out there and doing some signings and stuff and it was right before the finale and my publicist was calling me saying that a lot of people are asking, both editorial and fan sites, asking what we are going to do for the finale.  “Are you going to do a footlong finale thing with the grassroots thing?” and the girl who started the thing was in the UK and I met her there for the first time.  I think she was from Philadelphia and there happened to be a Subway there.  I didn’t even know they had them there because it’s called the Underground there.

    (Laughs)

  • TV Or Not TV: The Morning After for CHUCK 4/27

    tvornottv-header.png

    Welcome to another special Morning After edition of TV or Not TV, where I have been bowled over by Chuck and under whelmed by Heroes. As always I will remind you that I talk about anything and everything with the shows being discussed so if you haven’t yet watched them you might want to come back to this a little later.

    CHUCK vs. THE RING

    Many of you may be thrilled at the fact that the season finale of Chuck happened last night as you won’t have to deal with me whining about the
    potential demise of the show. My feelings aren’t lifted any bit after the NBC.com official Chuck page had the following listed for their streaming copy of the show.

    Lets hope it was just a matter of confusion

    The description has since been corrected to remove the Series Finale description, so who knows?

    What I do know is that last nights episode of Chuck was pure entertainment. One of the things that I love about this show is the subtle pop-culture references that are quietly slipped in. One that stands out was when Jeffster took to the altar at Ellie and Awesome’s wedding and Jeff turned to the string orchestra and told them “watch me for the changes just as my good friend Marty McFly did in Back to the Future. The Jeffster performance of Mr. Roboto combined with the shoot-out in the reception hall was also well played out both from a soundtrack stand-point as well as a plausible reason that the guests never heard one shot fired.

    Another thing that I enjoyed about last night was the performance of Chevy Chase as Ted Roark. I can’t think of another role where I’ve seen Chevy Chase play the heavy and I think that this may have been a missed calling since he really seemed to hone in on the part. I don’t know what this says about him playing such a believable bad guy, but it’s something I would have enjoyed seeing more of in the future.

    There are still two moments that stood out for me with last night’s show as well. When Sarah gave the confirming nod of no to Bryce that she wasn’t coming with him and was instead staying with Chuck it gave all of us sappy romantics a nice confirmation that there really is a future for these two.

    The other moment, of course, was the “game-changing” ending that the producers of the show have been alluding to for weeks. In many ways it does change the game, taking the potential of the show up to the next level. On a more important note, however, it was a defining moment for the character Chuck as he was actually faced with a choice in the role that he’s been playing in Operation Bartowski for the past two seasons. It wasn’t a decision forced on him as it was before and this is another important element that would benefit the character in his growth within this show.

    Was this really the finale that, if not renewed, Executive Producer Chris Fedak described the fan reaction as one wanting to have them, “burn their living rooms?” In retrospect, not really. There is the frustration that the show ended with the words TO BE CONTINUED”¦ but the story itself could serve as an ending that simply let’s us know the story continues for these characters even though we don’t get to see it.

    Now we wait patiently for the NBC up-fronts to find out what the fate of this very family friendly and entertaining show is. How do I know it is
    family friendly? My five year old daughter had me rewind the DVR three times so she could jump up and do kung fu along side of Chuck as he took down the bad guys. Chuck me indeed.

    HEROES: AN INVISIBLE THREAD

    My love-hate relationship with Heroes truly culminated with the season finale. A whole lot happened and we got somewhere, even though I’m not really sure where. They tied up loose ends but created a big ol’ plot hole for me that I just can’t seem to step around.

    There were two things at play with this episode: the bringing down of the ability hunting group in Building 26 and the stopping of Sylar meeting the President and taking control of the country by becoming him. The former story line was apparently necessary in aiding the release of Noah Bennett and confusing us with the fact that Hiro’s body is now rejecting the very time-stopping ability that used to naturally be his own.

    The bringing down of Sylar was the story that took up the majority of air time, and it was a compelling and interesting one. It is also, however, the most flawed story line due to a major plot hole that the writers I’m sure are really hoping that we overlook. Last night we saw the rather gruesome death of Nathan Patrelli at the hands of Sylar. After Sylar is eventually captured Noah and Angella come up with what they feel is the only plan to neuter Sylar and stop the government sanctioned capture of people with abilities: Use Matt Parkman to erase Sylar’s memory of himself and make him think that he is Nathan Patrelli and as such forcing his shape-shifting to make him Nathan Patrelli. A win-win for the writers but a major plot hole since we all know that Claire’s blood can revive the dead just as it did with her dad and, by proxy of Peter, healed Nathan’s blast wounds from the season 1 finale. This wasn’t in fact the only way to resolve this issue and is probably the most dangerous way to solve it.

    I can’t blame the writers for going this route. A bad guy like Sylar is darn near impossible to stop and there’s no single hero that can bring him
    down. He’s also too good of a bad guy to let go of incase you need to have a fallback. This means that you can’t kill him off but you also don’t want to allow him to still be in play since he’s really too big of a bad. I understand the reason they went the direction that they did, I just don’t agree with it.

    Unlike Chuck the show Heroes already has a pick-up for next season, so they teased us with a glimpse at the next volume titled Redemption. Here’s hoping there is more to the name than just a title because this show really needs some serious redemption in more ways than one.

    Will Wilkins is recorded from a previous live broadcast.

  • TV Or Not TV: 4/27 – 5/3

    tvornottv-header.png

    Welcome to TV or Not TV where I fear the Mantracker.

    When it comes to the reality show Mantracker I’m actually about three years and an entire network too late, but this past Saturday I stumbled upon a marathon and was instantly hooked. Now shown every Wednesday night at 10 PM on the Science Channel (note: not SciFi, just Science) this show features Terry Grant, an old fashioned cowboy of 25 years who is an expert at tracking people through rugged terrain of the open wild, up against two Prey who must try to get to a designated target (typically 40 killometers/25 miles away) before the Mantracker can find them.

    I know the concept doesn’t sound like much but to watch the show you find yourself instantly drawn in to this cat and mouse game of the Prey vs. the Mantracker. The editing is crisp and the soundtrack amplifies the drama or suspense of the moment. It’s also amazing to see how the simple things that we do when we walk or move around leave evidence in it’s wake.

    The contest itself isn’t exactly fair since the Mantracker does his thing on horseback where as the Prey are on foot. This does give some benefit to the Prey as they are, at times, able to out manuever the Mantracker but when push comes to shove in a flat out foot race the horse will win every time.

    Being the overthinker that I am I also have to wonder just how much evidence the camera crew that follow the Prey leave behind on this excursion and does the Mantracker use this to his advantage? Keen watchers of the show will also notice that if the Prey are caught up to sooner than the hour long show needs they will always get away (hey, you have to fill that time, right?).

    Even with all of this I still have to say that the show Mantracker is the perfect type of show to watch when you don’t want your mind to have to do any work and you’re just ready to sit and decompress. Now that OLN has bit the dust I don’t know when the fourth season of Mantracker will see the light of day, but hopefully when it does it will be on the Science Channel as well.

    Now that we’ve talked about Mantracker let’s see what else there is to track down to see this week.

    MONDAY

    NBC – 8:00 PM: It’s season finale night on NBC for Chuck and Heroes. Please, I’m begging you…. get everyone you know to watch Chuck tonight since this second season was phenomenal and the show really does deserve a third season.

    CBS – 8:30 PM: Another one of my favorites is back tonight with How I Met Your Mother finding Barney and Marshall messing with Ted after he doesn’t adhere to The Three Day Rule.

    NBC – 10:00 PM: Joe tries to use his daughter’s new found ability to save his failing company with her stock picks on Medium. Wasn’t this the plot of that Gary Coleman movie?

    TUESDAY

    FOX – 8:00 PM: Nothing says hip and modern like seeing the contestants of American Idol perform hits by the Rat Pack.

    CW – 8:00 PM: What’s the bad side of dating a demon? Dealing with what happens after you break up with her. Ben and Sock find out the hard way on Reaper.

    FOX – 9:00 PM: Tonight on Fringe we finally may find out more information on the Z.F.T. bio-terrorists. Nothing like them mythology connections to keep us sucked in.

    ABC – 10:00 PM: OK, can anyone out there tell me how long Cupid has been on the air and did ABC do anything to promote it?

    WEDNESDAY

    HIST – 8:00 PM: Go ape for two hours of MonsterQuest tonight as they re-air the 2005 episode of The Real King Kong and follow it up with a brand new episode titled Mysterious Ape Island.

    ABC – 9:00 PM: Our stuck in the 70’s LOSTies may find out how to get back to the future (snicker) with tonight’s return of Daniel Faraday. Turns out the physicist also finally spills the beans on everything he actually knows about the Island. I’m really hoping this one knocks our socks off as it’s titled The Variable and it is supposed to be the sister story to last seasons incredible episode The Constant.

    DISCOVERY – 9:00 PM: The MythBusters go after some YouTube myths. Wait, what do they do after the cellphone/popcorn debunking?

    THURSDAY

    CW – 8:00 PM: Things heat up on Smallville tonight when Clark finds out that Davis is still alive. We’re on the home stretch folks.

    ABC – 8:30 PM: Samantha Who? wraps up it’s second season tonight with a guest stint by Angie Harmon.

    NBC – 9:00 PM: Now that Pam has returned to Dunder Mifflin on The Office as a salesperson I see the competitive sparks flying between her and fiance Jim. Probably not tonight, but it’s coming.

    FRIDAY

    Nickelodeon – 8:00 PM: How could I be the father of a five year old without mentioning the kick off of the Fairly Odd Parents: Wishology three parter tonight?

    FOX – 9:00 PM: If you’ve been watching Dollhouse from the beginning and you want to know who Alpha is, you might want to tune in tonight.

    CARTOON NETWORK – 9:00 PM: If you didn’t catch Star Wars: The Clone Wars the first time around it starts to repeat its run tonight, now with informative pop ups!

    SATURDAY

    Nickelodeon – 8:00 PM: Part two of the Fairly Odd Parents three parter airs tonight and I’m sure my daughter will be on the edge of her seat.

    ABC – 8:00 PM: The Harry Potter franchise starts to take a considerable turn for the better with Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban.

    FOOD – 8:00 PM: Anyone on a diet should already avoid The Food Network but tonight you should REALLY avoid it as Guy Fieri looks back at his favorite stops in The Best of Diners, Drive-Ins, and Dives. This one will have you at your local greasy spoon in 10 seconds flat.

    A&E – 8:00 PM: 15 years ago Arnold was still cool and Jamie Lee could dance and still look good in True Lies.

    DISCOVERY – 8:00 PM: Three hours of Pitchmen might be tough if you are an impulsive buyer, if not it’s just fun to watch.

    SUNDAY

    Nickelodeon – 8:00 PM: Seriously, I’ve watched Nickelodeon’s Fairly Odd Parents three nights in a row now? Wow, I sure hope Timmy can defeat the Darkness.

    ABC – 9:00 PM: Now that Susan has been single and loving it Jackson returns tonight on Desperate Housewives to throw a hitch in her plan. Who am I kidding? I’ll probably be reeling from Fairly Odd Parents and won’t be able to concentrate.

    AMC – 8:00 PM: In all seriousness I’m going to have a tough time choosing between watching Happy Gilmore or…

    CMT – 8:00 PM: The Coen Brothers re-imaging of Homer’s The Odyssey is brilliantly done in O Brother, Where Art Thou?

    Will Wilkins was taped in front of a live studio audience.

  • TV Or Not TV: The Morning After for CHUCK (4/20)

    tvornottv-header.png

    Welcome back to TV or Not TV where I’m once again blown away by my good buddy Chuck .

    Last night’s episode of Chuck was by far one of the best of the entire run of the series and a great near-payoff for this season. After last night I find it hard to believe that there is still one more episode left to see with the season finale (Monday, 4/27 @ 8 PM) since there were so many things that were finally handed to the viewers.

    The first payoff happened as this episode started with Chuck and Sarah hiding from the government in trying to rescue Chuck ‘s dad (guest star Scott Bakula) from the clutches of FULCRUM and evil software guru Ted Roark (guest star Chevy Chase). After finding nothing but an abandoned drive-in at the location Chuck flashed on, the pair retire to a motel to collect their thoughts. Yes, a motel room. One bed. Yes folks, that’s right. Sarah and Chuck finally give in to all that sexual tension that has been building up. Too bad Morgan slipped an IOU for a condomn in the place of Chuck ‘s wallet protection (as well as Casey tracking the two down) and put the breaks on the mood.

    The second great payoff comes when someone else finally gets to learn that Chuck is an operative for the CIA. Who is this lucky person? Turns out it’s Captain Awesome himself, giving us one of the best lines ever on the show (“I need you to be awesome. Can you do that for me? Can you be… awesome?”). It was really nice to have someone else finally learn that Chuck has been doing a lot to save his country and understand all of the conflict this surely brings him internally. It’s bad that it was Ellie’s fiance, since really they shouldn’t be keeping any secrets from one another as husband and wife, and I have to wonder if this will lead to conflict in the season finale. However it turns out Awesome was awesome in settling his fiance’s nerves as it seemed that neither her dad nor her brother would be ther for the rehearsel dinner.

    The third payoff comes in the eventual rescue of Chuck ‘s dad. When Casey learns that an air strike team has been assembled to dispatch the FULCRUM drive-in instead of being able to keep his promise to rescue Steve Bartowski, Casey rushes to help his two fugitive team mates. The rescue doesn’t go as planned and all are captured in the same room the newly built Intersect is being run. Chuck ‘s dad tells Chuck too watch the screen since he “made it for him” and POW! Chuck is now Intersect free! The air strike force shows up just in time to give them cover for an escape and everyone gets away.

    The last payoff we were given was the culmination of the Buy More power struggle saga. Emmett is now the manager of the store and he applies pressure to Morgan to become his assistant manager (which he refers to as Ass Man). Morgan originally caves in and does his evil bidding, but girlfriend Anna finally gets him to realize what is important and in a shocking move Morgan gets up his nerve, quits the Buy More and whisks Anna away to fulfill his dream of moving to Hawaii to become a chef at Benihana. Everyone even gives him a slow clap build up sendoff.

    Of course it wasn’t all champagne and roses at the end as we learn that Roark has survived the air strike and is now on his way to crash the wedding.

    NEXT WEEK AND THE FUTURE OF CHUCK

    As mentioned above, the season finale of Chuck is next week. Roark is going to try to crash the party and an Intersect free Chuck has to face off against him. I have no idea what else will happen next week. I’m dying to see what will happen next week, especially since SOMETHING has to happen next week to perpetuate the premise of the show. Chuck was pivotal to the operation because he was the Intersect with all kinds of info trapped in his head. How can the show continue without this? What diabolical plan do they have to move things forward?

    The other real question is will they actually move forward? The Hollywood Reporter set the Internet ablaze on Monday with a Save Chuck fire after they described the show as “on the bubble” which means that even though it’s fate isn’t decided it hasnt’ been saved yet from cancellation. Bloggers, journalists and fan sites are all sending out their appeals this week to make sure that we all do our part in saving the show. There’s good reason to save the show as well since, according to television producer Josh Schwartz in a New York Times Article, “If…. that is the last episode of the show to ever air, it will be one of the least satisfying finales of all time. Chris Fedak, the guy who created the show, said people will set their living rooms on fire.” We can’t have a ton of domestic arson, can we?

    If you want to know how to try to do your part to save the show Chuck than the best strategy is the one outlined on the fan site ChuckTV.net with their watch/buy/share campaign. Watch the show live, get you and everyone you know to watch everthing Chuck related on NBC.com (the show, mashup videos, everything). If you really want to flex your power and have your voice heard in the digital age then traffic and hits are probably the sure fire way to tip the scales folks.

    I can’t wait to see the season finale of Chuck and I’ll hope you’ll be there with me.

    Will Wilkins is neither an Asset nor the Intersect.