FRED Entertainment

March 3, 2010

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Trace Beaulieu

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have a bit of a chat with the man behind MYSTERY SCIENCE THEATER’S Crow T. Robot & Dr. Clayton Forrester, and now one-fifth of CINEMATIC TITANIC, Trace Beaulieu.

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Trace Beaulieu“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-trace_beaulieu.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

March 2, 2010

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Matt Debenham

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have a freewheeling chat with author Matt Debenham, whose first collection of short stories, THE BOOK OF RIGHT AND WRONG, will be released this June.

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Matt Debenham“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-matt_debenham.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

February 26, 2010

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Caissie St. Onge 2

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have another chat with a very funny writer/producer who traces her career from THE LATE SHOW WITH DAVID LETTERMAN through THE ROSIE O’DONNELL SHOW to THE BEST WEEK EVER (and its Paul F. Tompkins-helmed successor). There are plenty of other stops along the way, and plenty of irons in the fire, so sit back & listen to me chat w/ the very funny Caissie St. Onge.

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Caissie St. Onge 2“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-caissie_st_onge-2.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

Trailer Park: Christopher McDonald Interview

By Christopher Stipp

The Archives, Right Here

I was able to sit down for a couple of years and pump out a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

Check out my new column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

GREEN ZONE – SCREENING

greenzoneposterYes, United 93 made me a little ill. With all that shaky-cam movements he’s known for Paul Greengrass has tempered his need to put his cameras on paint shakers. Thank the heavens for that as I was able to enjoy the last Bourne film with much more interest.

His latest, GREEN ZONE, looks like it will be a thriller in the most classical of ways. Immediate, visceral, fast-moving, and starring the acting stylings Matt Damon this will be a film that ought to satisfy the action jones any guy must have with the lack of action at the box office as of late. I have your tickets to a screening on March 9th, at Tempe Marketplace, at 7:00 p.m.

Shoot me an e-mail at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com and I’ll make sure you get entered to get a pair of tickets

A film description:

Matt Damon and director Paul Greengrass (The Bourne Supremacy, The Bourne Ultimatum, United 93) re-team for their latest electrifying thriller in Green Zone, a film set in the chaotic early days of the Iraqi War when no one could be trusted and every decision could detonate unforeseen consequences.

During the U.S.-led occupation of Baghdad in 2003, Chief Warrant Officer Roy Miller (Damon) and his team of Army inspectors were dispatched to find weapons of mass destruction believed to be stockpiled in the Iraqi desert. Rocketing from one booby-trapped and treacherous site to the next, the men search for deadly chemical agents but stumble instead upon an elaborate cover-up that inverts the purpose of their mission.

Spun by operatives with intersecting agendas, Miller must hunt through covert and faulty intelligence hidden on foreign soil for answers that will either clear a rogue regime or escalate a war in an unstable region. And at this blistering time and in this combustible place, he will find the most elusive weapon of all is the truth.

Christopher McDonald – Interview

It was Tappy Tibbons that really drew me into Christopher McDonald’s world. Sure, you could can talk all you like about the comedic life he pored into making Shooter McGavin such a despicable villain but it was Darren Aronofsky who saw something indelible in making McDonald a pivotal part of his dramatic fever dream.

McDonald has put in over thirty years making memorable roles that lesser actors would just as soon blend into the background playing. He’s made it his livelihood, his life’s work, playing parts that take on something special when he filters their essence through his sensibility. What that sensibility is, for the most part, are characters that you love to hate, but they are characters that make you feel something. I had a chance to talk to McDonald about his latest film, Splinterheads, which is now available to buy on DVD, but I was insanely curious to know more about the life of an actor that isn’t front and center with every production, how you make a life out of playing roles that people may or may not remember.

splintCHRISTOPHER STIPP:  In preparing for this interview I thought it was interesting of how, as you were coming through the ranks, you had a Timex that was set to go off on a set schedule as a reminder, to you, to think about where your career was going.

MCDONALD: Where did you find that?

CS:  It was in an interview you did but i thought the sentiment was genuinely resonant. Do you still have that Timex in your head? Do you always re-evaluate what you do?

MCDONALD: That’s a very good question and, to be honest with you, I think the ticking gets less loud once you reach a certain amount of success.

It’s not a complacency that you get, don’t get me wrong, I’m very focused on what I’m doing, but I know that I’m not that same guy that’s always looking for that reassurance from the business to make your way.  It’s more like…I’m part of the club now, it’s really lovely to be involved…it’s a mutual respect thing when you see people and say, “Hey”¦Hey, McDonald get over here.”Â  It’s all kind of great now, it’s more “How do you have more control so it gets in the world?” this year. I’m doing my first directorial project, I’ve got 4 or 5 movies coming out, I’m promoting this one which I loved shooting it and hope it makes a little bit of noise in the DVD and downloading world.  So it’s like that.  It’s something that beats not every hour but every day.  I look for something to be sure I’m headed in the right way.

CS:  You just directed your first feature?

MCDONALD: I’m in the process of casting it and directing it and won’t actually get under the cameras until this Fall so I’m leaving myself a lot of pre-production time.  Takes place in the Fall over about 8-10 years.

CS:  Why did it take you this long to say, “You know what, why don’t I make one of these things”?

MCDONALD: I think what it took me ““ there was just so much love for me out there in the acting world I hope that never goes away and have been offered so many great things and almost too busy to do it.  But now when you think about it, it’s kind of like writing also, I’m also afraid to do it.

Not that I think I won’t be good at it but I think anything that detracts from what we were just talking about ““ what am I doing with my career as an actor in Hollywood, this guy who came from nothing out in the boonies in New York, to this town of broken dreams on Hollywood Blvd.  It was a big step and everyone thought I’d be back in 8 months with my tail between my legs and, by hook or by crook, you keep going so I wanted to dance only with the girl I came with.

But then I thought how many times have I seen my work and the work of other people that I know been cut out because, when the baby is coming down the birth canal, and it’s just too long, the director has to make that decision so I wanted to make sure I was good enough to do the math in my head to say I know how long this movie’s going to be, I know what I need to shoot because I already edited it in my head so I won’t be wasting money, wasting time, and breaking some hearts down the line saying, “I hated to do it, I’m sorry, we cut those 2 to 3 scenes out so, sorry.”  That’s a horrible thing.  It’s happened to me, it’s happened to friends and it’s not fun but I wanted to be prepared.

CS:  And now with Splinterheads, this is Brant Sersen’s first film writing and directing.

MCDONALD: Correct.

CS:   Describe for me what it’s like with a first time director/writer on a film like this.

MCDONALD: I’ve had great success with first time director/writers.  The smartest thing one can do, I have learned, is surround yourself with the best possible people.  There are a couple of missteps, and are, in every movie, but other ones I’ve seen there have been bigger missteps where people were let go and another group hired to come in and save the day.  Your right arm is your DP, because that’s where the time, and actual total and pictures of the movie take place.  So you want to be with the guy who can deliver that and I thought that Brant did a brilliant job.  Was a great DP and very smooth.  There were a couple days where things went too long but for the most part it was very well run, it was run not on a dime but it was a cheaper production and all the money went up on the screen.  And it was great to see Patchogue, Long Island really embrace this movie and stepped up and donated food and time and lots of good extras and didn’t cry that we were shutting down the streets, as some towns do but they really welcomed us with open arms and it was terrific.

CS:  What did you see in the script?  I read that you are always looking for reasons to say yes to a project.  What made you say yes to this one?

MCDONALD: I have to say on this one it was particularly interesting because he rewrote it for me with the idea that I might be doing it.  So when they offered me the part I was a) flattered and b) it was perfect timing.  I always wanted to work in a town where”¦ I was born in Long Island and had my formative years there.  Lea Thompson was involved and she’s a terrific old pal of mine and Frankie Faison.  The only question mark was the director. I already loved the script and this Thomas Middleditch. This guy I never heard of.  So they sent me a couple links to go find his work and I just found out immediately the guy is very funny and uniquely talented.  And Rachel Taylor was a big boon when we got her to sign on because she is truly spectacularly beautiful and played the part really well I thought and she really embraced the material.  But there are a lot of different things, if it’s not the director which I usually say yes to if it’s the director.  It’s ultimately the material, director, co-stars…little things like money helps.

(Laughs)

Location helps as well.  And you don’t want to keep repeating yourself all the time but you want to give it a different slant or flavor or an attack on a part that you haven’t done before and that’s what I got a chance to do with this Bruce Mancuso, the only cop in town.

christopher1CS:  One of the things I was reminded of when I saw the film was that I’m constantly amazed at what you are able to do. You’re definitely a working man’s actor and you are not comfortable doing one thing here and one thing there ““ you constantly surround yourself with different projects.  One of the most famous character, at least in my eyes, was Tappy Tibbons from Requiem For A Dream. What you did with Darren utterly blew me away.  How do you find ways to reinvent a character or try to look at a character a different way and  give it a life you haven’t before given because obviously looking your resume it’s filled up with all parts but they each feel different.

MCDONALD: Well, thank you for saying that, first of all.  I think in that particular case with Darren Aronofsky a lot of it was improvisational where we actually worked around the streets of New York City.  He had a camera in his hand and people would recognize me and I would respond to them as Tappy Tibbons.  So that kind of got the juices flowing.  They knew me but didn’t know my name or the ones who did know my name new me from Shooter McGavin or something like that.  They wouldn’t use that in the coverage and would move on to someone else but would use the reactions and it was quite interesting.  Or shooting on the rooftop of his little 5 floor walk-up in Hell’s Kitchen, which I think has changed now for some reason.

(Laugh)

But I think all that kind of improvisation helped me get on the sound stage that day at Tappy and just kind of let it rip.  He just kind of let me go and play this game and get the audience going and then bring on Sara played brilliantly by Ellen Burstyn and it was something I was never really on sure ground so I knew it was sort of out there and I was pushing the envelope each time.  Because I was sort of a drug.  I was putting a drug in her mind.  So how much is it really me and how much is it her interpretation of me?  So I thought that was an interesting challenge and I’m glad it turned out as well as it did.

CS:  Absolutely. Now, you’ve mentioned at one time that you are comfortable with being pigeonholed because that means you get to work…

MCDONALD: Yeah, pigeonhole me.  It’s better working than not working.

CS: Obviously, pigeonholing connotes some bad things but how did you become so comfortable it or was it just as simple as, “You know what, I’m working. So who cares what other people think?”

MCDONALD: The whole thing in pigeonholing is when I see a movie I like to see someone like Daniel Day Lewis who is never the same in any part.  That, to me, is tremendous chameleon character lead acting.  Yes, when he has to play something that is close to himself, we’ve seen that before, but there is always a different spin on it.  I thought there are other actors the audience won’t embrace in a different role.  They wouldn’t embrace John Belushi, God rest his soul, as a guy that was trying to make a serious movie at times and no one went.  So in my particular situation I try to do what I know the part calls for and if it’s left to me to add to it I am going to try something different or I’ll just try something more amped up if I think the scene needs it, or the movie needs it or the character needs it.

People seem to respond to that much more than playing it straight ahead ““ like Kevin Costner straight-ahead leading man guy you love, the movies that Gary Cooper and Clark Gable cut their teeth on.  I’m much more of a character lead and I love dancing around the exterior ledge with one foot playing super real and another foot where you are going I can dance out here a little bit to make it more memorable, but it’s all dependent on the character.

CS:  Right.  And have you been offered roles where you are the lead and have to carry the film?

MCDONALD: Yes.  I’ve had some success at things but they haven’t made the noise or, should I say, have the following that the other parts, the colorful parts, have.  I did a wonderful movie written by the guy who wrote the Omen called the 18th Angel.  We shot it in Italy.  It was a terrific experience to play the lead guy who’s daughter had the devil come through her.  Long story short, it was wonderful. Maximilian Schell was in the movie but it just was not promoted.  When it’s out there in cable land it does quite well but I see something like that I just say, “I could have done it and kept on doing it.”  I loved it.  I was in almost every frame of the movie but parts like that don’t come my way that often.  If it had become a big success it would have been a turn in my career but it wasn’t.  I’ve done a couple other things like that on television shows.  But people and ultimately employers really respond to how the audience responds to my character work.

chris_mcdonaldCS:  I find it very curious that you are out here stumping for a film that is now available on DVD.  Why are you out here, again, stumping for a movie that has played and that now people might get the chance to see in the secondary market?

MCDONALD: I want more eyes on the prize.  I think the movie is very funny and at the same time very true to life.  There are kids like this ““ Thomas Middleditch who plays Justin ““ kids have no direction and takes this angel that comes to town to really kind of just kick him in gear. You see this guy in the formative time of his life.

I want people to see it. It’s just a fun movie.  It’s won awards and accolades as far as audience awards and stuff like that.  The reason I’m stumping for it is because I want more eyes on the prize.  I would like people to check it out because I think they would have a good time.

CS:  Being in the business for over three decades what’s the biggest change you see right now in terms of where you are right now versus where you started?  Has the business changed from your perspective?

MCDONALD: The business has changed tremendously.  There’s not as much work on television because of ““ even with all the new channels and things like that, the prime time gets all the attention ““ there are so many reality shows on.

They are cheap to make but it dumbs down the American people.  If I want to watch the Kardashians who have all this money and watch people make all these dippy choices in their life, then a lot of it isn’t reality.  “Would you be really angry at her please?  Just try it out.”  Kinda like walking on the Jerry Springer Show.  You have to start a fight within a minute.  That kind of stuff is manipulative and brings down the whole intelligence level of what defines entertainment.  All the wonderful hours we used to do and comedies we used to do ““ there are so few left because of all the hours taken up by reality television.  That said, it’s the most wonderful time in the world.  If I was starting out now it would be completely different because of the ease of technology that makes everything ““ if I had a story to tell I would have started 13 years ago but back in my day videotape hadn’t really started yet.

christopherNow you have a camcorder, tell a story, and cut it on your Mac and put music on it and you have a showcase.  Fantastic.  So that technology part is fantastic.  The cable world is where I live when I watch television because I think they are breaking new ground.

Some of the greatest writing that’s done for television now is on cable and networks that are fighting for their hours.  You pull Jay Leno down and that takes away 5 hours a night a week of programming?  That’s massive.  So it’s a very interesting time.  A very scary time.  Everything is going to be streaming ““ people will be going to their Blockbuster stores ““ saying, “What was that movie?”  And boom, it’s on your phone right there.  It’s movies now wherever you are which is fantastic because we’re always going to need good product and I would just love to ride the next wave which is going to be that whole streaming thing.  I go to Sundance every year and watch the new developments in 3D ““ that’s what people are going to go to theaters for because they aren’t going to have 3D things in their house.  It’s the whole communal thing of going to a movie and being blown away by 3D, Avatar, going, “Oh my god, that was an experience.”  That stuff is exciting as hell.  But for the most part I think it’s changed tremendously and I hope to grow with the process because I hope to be doing this until the day I die.

CS:  If I could ask just one more question… I read that your family means a lot to you and the roles you choose are predicated on how close you can be to them. When you look at your career, is there any sort of hope that your family will think one way or the other about what you’ve done, your oeuvre of work?  Any conscious choice to always put that at the forefront or is there sacrifice?

MCDONALD: There is always sacrifice.  There are a lot of films that I don’t want my kids to see, Requiem for a Dream being one, until they are 21, and a lot of times I made the choice to do Disney movies.  I would go after them so my kids could see what Daddy does.

And a lot of actors do this but the family becomes the most important thing once you hit a level of success.  That’s what you really want.  Want to share the whole thing.  There are a lot of movies that take you away from that and when the kids were young the whole family went with me, like to Italy.  It was a blessing.  You can’t pull them out of soccer.  You can’t pull them out of school.  It’s pretty hard as they get older.  But the best thing about technology is just Skype them or if you have a Mac, just iChat them and there you are sitting at the kitchen table.  It’s a gift to look in their eyes that the generation before us just didn’t have.  So as things change and life goes on you take the movies you really want to do and then sometimes take them because you need to pay the rent.  But for the most part I’ve turned plenty of stuff down that I wouldn’t want my family to see but for the most part I try to find a way to make it palatable but you never know.  Sometimes if it’s not on the page it’s not going to be on the stage.

February 10, 2010

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Storm DiCostanzo

Filed under: A Bit Of A Chat With Ken Plume,Interviews — Tags: , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 4:34 pm

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I chat with one half of the musical comedy duo Paul & Storm – the Teller-esque half known as Storm…

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Storm DiCostanzo“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-storm_dicostanzo.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

The No Show: An Interview with James Cameron

Filed under: Interviews,No Show — Tags: , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 1:11 am

noshowheader.png

An exclusive interview with James Cameron, Emperor of Everything on his latest James Cameron Epic Motion Pictureâ„¢: AVATAR

lucyline.gif

Now that the James Cameron Epic Motion Pictureâ„¢ Avatar has taken over as the Greatest James Cameron Epic Motion Pictureâ„¢ Ever Made and James Cameron himself has been crowned Emperor of Everything, it’s only fitting that The No Show track him down and ask him the hard hitting questions that everyone is too scared to ask for fear that he will crush them with his withering stares and his personal army of Terminators (they’re totally real by the way).

noshow-cameron.png

Now that the James Cameron Epic Motion Pictureâ„¢ Avatar has taken over as the Greatest James Cameron Epic Motion Pictureâ„¢ Ever Made and James Cameron himself has been crowned Emperor of Everything, it’s only fitting that The No Show track him down and ask him the hard hitting questions that everyone is too scared to ask for fear that he will crush them with his withering stares and his personal army of Terminators (they’re totally real by the way).

lucyline.gif

THE NO SHOW: So James – may I call you James?

The Disembodied Voice of James Cameron, Emperor of Everything: You may refer to me as James Cameron, Emperor of Everything.

THE NO SHOW: I’m sorry…?

TDVoJC (EoE): Please refer to me by my given name, James Cameron, Emperor of Everything.

THE NO SHOW: That’s going to eat into a lot of our interview time.

TDVoJC (EoE): Don’t worry your pretty little head about it. After all, I’m a Master of Time and Space.

THE NO SHOW: Master of Time?

TDVoJC (EoE): And Space, yes. All Canadians are, but they’re too polite to really use the skill. Those that do become incredibly successful for almost no reason whatsoever, of course. Think about it: Jim Carrey, Mike Myers, Alanis Morissette – what have they done to deserve their success?

THE NO SHOW: That does explain a lot.

TDVoJC (EoE): Absolutely. Just look at my previous Epic Motion Pictureâ„¢ Titanic – that flew by for millions of viewers around the world, right? And yet it clocked in at an epic 19 hours long. No-one even noticed because I squeezed it into a paltry three hours and 17 minutes.

THE NO SHOW: It still felt pretty long.

TDVoJC (EoE): So if we’re running short on time, I’ll bend time and space to make sure you get in all your questions. So long as I approve of the questions. Otherwise, I’ll rewind time and refuse this interview. And then make sure you achieve none of your lifelong ambitions. I will also un-invent the internet if you bug me. Just to make sure.

In fact, if you do, say or suggest anything of which I do not approve, in addition to killing every pet you have ever owned, I will travel back to your early twenties and sleep with your first serious girlfriend, little… [loud electrical disturbance] Mary McGoogle. My she was a hottie wasn’t she?

THE NO SHOW: …

TDVoJC (EoE): [loud electrical disturbance] Oh yes she was. I just went back and did her anyway. Twice. Just to show you I mean business. You should call her up and ask her. She probably wouldn’t take your call though. Once you go Disembodied Master of Space and Time, you never go back, as they say. On the bright side, you’ll find you have now never had crabs. You’re welcome.

THE NO SHOW: So, your film, Avatar, has been breaking records all over the place –

TDVoJC (EoE): Do you mean my Epic Motion Pictureâ„¢ Avatar?

THE NO SHOW: Yes, the film –

TDVoJC (EoE): – my Epic Motion Pictureâ„¢ –

THE NO SHOW: – Avatar has done major box office –

TDVoJC (EoE): My Epic Motion Pictureâ„¢ Avatar is has been are doing precisely the box office I am are making it do. Done. Sorry, tenses get a bit squiffy with time travel.

THE NO SHOW: Did your plans include being knocked off the top spot in the US by Dear John, by all accounts a soppy romance with virtually no story and no big Hollywood names?

TDVoJC (EoE): Yes. This was exactly as I made it happen. My Epic Motion Pictureâ„¢ Avatar beat the record box office run established by my previous Epic Motion Pictureâ„¢ Titanic, and my next Epic Motion Pictureâ„¢ will beat my current Epic Motion Pictureâ„¢ and so on and so forth. It’s a long-term strategy.

THE NO SHOW: And you made this happen…?

TDVoJC (EoE): Absolutely. I manipulated time and space, went back and forth, checked out the films that were due to be released around this time and chose Dear John, which was the least threatening.

Then, late at night while everybody was sleeping, I crept into their rooms and whispered, “You will go see Dear John this weekend. You will go see Dear John this weekend. This will not affect your unquestioning devotion to James Cameron’s Epic Motion Pictureâ„¢ Avatar.” Lo and behold, my Epic Motion Pictureâ„¢ Avatar drops to second place. And this way, no-one even noticed that my Epic Motion Pictureâ„¢ Avatar had virtually no story.

As for the Epic box office performance of my Epic Motion Pictureâ„¢ Avatar, well, what can I say? I’ve always done well with sequels.

THE NO SHOW: Sequel?

TDVoJC (EoE): Well, technically my Epic Motion Pictureâ„¢ Avatar is the fourteenth in a series.

THE NO SHOW: But Avatar –

TDVoJC (EoE): – my Epic Motion Pictureâ„¢ Avatar –

THE NO SHOW: Whatever, it wasn’t a sequel.

TDVoJC (EoE): Of course it was, the first one bombed, don’t you remember? Then I did all those test screenings, made the Na’vi skinny and half-naked, gave the female ones pert little Shakira-like breasts and – oh no, of course you don’t. Silly me, always forgetting these things. Interesting story: in fact, this is the fourteenth release of the film, you just don’t remember them. I kept going back in time, simplifying the story, making it more familiar and comfortable for audiences and adding more partial nudity and explosions and special effects until BAM, I had a multi-million dollar hit on my hands. Simples.

THE NO SHOW: Is that why the film –

TDVoJC (EoE): – Epic Motion Pictureâ„¢ –

THE NO SHOW: – has been described as a mix between Pocahontas, The Dark Crystal and the Smurfs, but for adults?

TDVoJC (EoE): [loud electrical disturbance] … I’m sorry, what were you saying?

THE NO SHOW: … Hm, that’s funny, I don’t remember.

TDVoJC (EoE): That’s fine. You were asking how it feels to have created what many are calling the most Epic cinematic experience since my last Epic Motion Pictureâ„¢ Titanic.

THE NO SHOW: Was I? I don’t recall…

TDVoJC (EoE): No problem. It feels great.

THE NO SHOW: Um OK, thanks for taking the time to speak with us.

TDVoJC (EoE): My pleasure. And remember: my next Epic Motion Pictureâ„¢, The Little Mermaid, comes out next year. And it will be in 4D, a technology I haven’t even invented yet, but I’m confident I’ll be able to borrow from somewhere in time and claim as my own with a few very minor tweaks.

THE NO SHOW: The Little Mermaid? You mean like the Disney ““

TDVoJC (EoE): [loud electrical disturbance] … I’m sorry, what were you saying?

THE NO SHOW: Um, sorry, I’ve lost my train of thought. In any case, we’ve run out of time, so I’ll just say thanks to the Disembodied Voice of James Cameron, Emperor of Everything, and we look forward to what I’m sure will have been your next biggest Epic Motion Pictureâ„¢ ever.

TDVoJC (EoE): Now you’re getting it.

THE NO SHOW: By the way, I loved Citizen Kane.

TDVoJC (EoE): Thanks. I was particularly proud of that one.

Brought to you by The No Show

Opinion In A Haystack: Adam Rifkin

haystackheader.jpg

QUESTIONING GREATNESS with ADAM RIFKIN:

EARTH’S PREMIERE STORYTELLER

cid_cdf8ef2f-4855-43eb-a471-a09ffa185c1b

We (Bob Rose, me, I?) at the OPINION IN A HAYSTACK DEPARTMENT are proud to announce that I (we?) were (was?) given the chance to pick the brain bucket of Hollywood’s supreme philosopher and film-creationist, Sir Adam Rifkin (facebook, twitter, myspace.) He’s the filmmaker responsible for Detroit Rock City, The Chase, The Dark Backward, and, more recently, the award winning Look. I was able to sit down with Mr. Rifkin, in front of our respective computers, and interview him, via email, about a plethora of assorted, varied, diverse, sundry, indiscriminate, and heavily kaleidoscopic ideas.

I originally sent Mr. Rifkin over 3,000 questions, most of which involved very uncomfortable queries about his family lineage, sexual fears, and Laserdisc-replica collection. He answered all of them in full detail, thus passing the interview-qualification-process, which allowed me to send him the 16 questions you will find below.

This interview brought to you by BLUMP’S WEASELRONI: “Bring Variety Back into Your Mealtimes!”

BOB ROSE: First, thank you for taking the time to answer my questions. From what I can tell you’ve been interviewed by Movie Poop Shoot/Quick Stop/FRED at least three times by now, covering almost every subject of your career imaginable, so I hope it’s ok if I ask some rather unconventional questions and get some unconventional answers? If not, let me know, I will write conventional questions I promise! I swear!!!

ADAM RIFKIN: Great. No problem, ask whatever you like. I’d also love to schedule a live interview at your convenience. That said, evenings are better for me. Either Wednesday or Thursday. Because of my crazy schedule I’m only free from precisely 11:32pm and 15 seconds to 11:32pm and 22 seconds. Hopefully we can get everything we need to discuss covered in those 7 seconds. If we can possibly cover everything in 4 seconds it’d actually be a little better for me because I could really use those 3 extra seconds to do my laundry, feed my cat, jerk off, pay my bookie, paint my house, eat some cheese, bake a cake, shave my balls, pop my zits, tweeze my eyebrows, kneed some bread, pluck my chickens, write a novel, sue my landlord, lipo my love handles, fuck my girlfriend, do an Iron Man, rehearse an opera, condemn an innocent man, ponder the sound of one hand clapping, blink The Bible in Morse Code, club some baby white harp seals, use my powers of hypnosis to pick up chicks, pretend I’m a robot, scratch my ass, swallow my tongue, make Star Trek door noises, stare at an image for a really long time and then close my eyes and study the after image that lingers behind my eyelids, make myself throw up, make prank phone calls to 911, burn ants with a magnifying glass, have a water gargling contest with a midget, fart in an elevator, provoke an unstable hobo, secure my pant legs with rubber bands and fill my jeans with chili, yawn on an immigrant, return my Christmas presents, carve a life size statue of Marv Albert out of chopped liver, calk my crack with creamed herring, commit acts of heresy, bang a gong, loiter outside a 7-11, obsess on obscure JFK conspiracy theories, fondle the penal code of the habeas corpus, ipso facto, e, pluribus unim, e tu, Brute, odds bodkins, ad absurdum, infinitum, and so forth and so on until we’ll all die a horrible, wretched and miserable death. Other than that, I’m pretty open. Cool?

BOB: I’m a studio executive, drunk on power, with cash flowing out of every orifice. I walk up to you, dressed in velvet, and say “Mr. Rifkin, I’ll give you $500 MILLION for your next film, all I ask is that at some point a character must say the phrase: “Gee, this sauce is rather tart, here’s your money.” What film would you make?

ADAM: Easy choice! I’d make a film entitled SUGAR TITS. It’s a long time passion project of mine about a drunken, anti-Semitic movie star who, after being pulled over by the cops for DUI, goes on a vicious cross country killing spree in the name of religion. The film will star Mel Gibson as himself and will open with the all too familiar dashboard video of Mel Gibson being pulled over by Malibu police for driving erratically. The two cops yank him out of the car and soon surmise that the famous actor/director is plastered beyond cognition and attempt to arrest him. After going on a biblically charged, nonsensical tirade to Officer Shlomo Finkelstien, about the fact that the Jews of the world are responsible for all the wars throughout history, he looks amorously to the beautiful and buxom Officer Tootsie Weems and exclaims the now infamous line, “What are you looking at Sugar Tits?”, (which has since become a staple pick-up line on college campuses across the country). While being handcuffed, Mel recites the Good Sheppard Psalm in a mocking Yiddish accent, then breaks free of the cuffs, (thanks to having prepped for a Dick Donner version of a Houdini movie that never materialized).

He then steals Officer Finkelstien’s gun and kills him, execution style, with a single bullet to the taint. He quickly subdues Officer Weems with his mad Jew-Jitsu skills, hog ties her and throws her into the back seat of the police cruiser. Thirsty for as much camera time as humanly possible, Gibson decapitates Officer Finkelstien with the Bowie knife that’s strapped to his ankle, and uses the officer’s disembodied head as a theatrical prop for what he drunkenly believes will be his greatest performance. He then sloppily slurs his way through the “Alas, poor Yorick” speech from his film version of Franco Zeffirelli’s Hamlet, taking awkward breaks between the Iambic Pentameter to suck on whip cream gas from a can of Tippy-Top Topping. Satisfied with his performance, he grabs his balls and screams “Suck on that A. O. Scott!” into the dash cam before stealing the cop car with Officer Weems still hogtied in the back, as his prisoner and sex slave.

Strangely, A. O. Scott, not only, never reviewed the Zeffirelli version of Hamlet, but Hamlet was released in 1990 and Scott didn’t start reviewing for the New York Times until 2000. But go argue with a drunk. Gibson then proceeds to head across the country drinking to excess, preaching the gospel and massacring anyone who dare question his fire, brimstone and beer nuts approach to the Good Book. Along the way he’ll have many adventures and encounter a plethora of obstacles while assassinating as many innocent people as possible. The deaths will be highly stylized and extremely creative. For example, he’ll meet up with Purvis Nimblestroid, a nose hair clipper salesman from Des Moines Iowa who lives with his 78 year old mother, a sufferer of an odd form of dementia resulting in her being convinced she’s Britney Spears. Gibson and Weems, (now lobotomized and completely under Gibson’s control,) rent a room in the Nimblestroid’s home posing as a married couple from South Bend. One night while Mrs. Nimblestroid is performing “Oops, I Did It Again” in the living room after a home made supper of turtle chops and egg soup, Mel takes it upon himself to roll play and pretends to be a member of the paparazzi. He uses an empty box of Kraft Mac N’ Cheese as a camera and starts snapping away, but when Old Lady Nimblestroid horrifically recreates the “no underwear” incident that set the internet on its ear,
Mel is driven into a fit of blind rage. Furious at her ungodly behavior, Gibson ties up both mother and son and kills them slowly with a melon baller. Scoop by scoop he reduces them to a pile of bloody orbs, then Gibson forces Weems to eat the super ball sized remains while sitting in a kiddie pool filled with bible pages and sour cream . As Mel and Tootsie continue East, and as the bodies continue to pile up, FBI agent Zack Craggs is always just one step behind the illusive mass murdering movie star. Conflicted about spearheading the case to catch Gibson, Craggs grew up a massive Mel fan and has a hard time coming to terms with the fact that his child hood hero is a ferocious and fanatical monster. He continually questions his loyalty to the bureau versus the star of his all time favorite film, Bird On A Wire.

Ultimately the story lines all converge at SedaKon, the world’s largest Neil Sedaka convention, when Craggs, in a heart pounding action sequence, chases Gibson through the rafters of the Albuquerque Convention center during Neil’s show stopping performance of Breaking Up Is Hard To Do hundreds of feet below. There’s also a subplot involving Mel smuggling illegal artificial sweeteners into Mexico in Officer Weems fake breasts and them exploding at the border. There is also an elaborate fantasy sequence where Mel rides a giant flying mongoose into the past. The time traveling marsupial takes him into ancient Judea where Mel and Jesus star in a buddy movie together, Jesus playing a loose cannon cop who’s ability to rise from the dead causes him to continually take unnecessary risks, and Mel as his beleaguered sweater-less partner who always says, “I’m gettin’ too cold for this shit.” (kind of a twist on the familiar), but I won’t bore you with all those details. Anyway, the film ends with Mel appearing on Larry King, miraculously having convinced authorities and the public at large that it was actually Agent Craggs who was the killer and that Mel was actually the hero who stopped him from his murderous rampage.

The whole film is to be an indictment of the fact that we let celebrities get away with anything, including murder, because they’re charming, funny and oh so engaging in a quick sound bite. What Larry King doesn’t know however, is that Mel’s new “Gibson’s Own” brand of tomato sauce is actually made (in part) from the brains of all his victims, and when Larry agrees to plug Mel’s new product, buys some and taste it on live TV, he says; “Gee, this sauce is rather tart, here’s your money”. But I don’t want to give away too much (in case this really happens.)

BOB: Your film, The Chase, has quite possibly the most dangerously-elegant sex scene ever conceived. Was the scene inspired by true events?

ADAM: Well, the inspiration behind Charlie Sheen and Kristy Swanson having sex in a speeding car in THE CHASE was the fact that, that is precisely how I was conceived. I never really wanted to know the details beyond the basic facts, I mean, who wants to think about their parents doing the horizontal mambo? Burying the weasel? Doing the tube steak fandango? Filling the cream Doughnut? Getting some stank on the hang low? Having a bit of pork pot pie? Puttin’ sour cream in the Burrito? Running the naked Wheel Barrow Race? Etc… But that was the kernel of truth that inspired the whole movie. Unlike in the film however, my parents actually crashed during the act. My father blindly barreled into an old age retirement community and regrettable killed 27 senior citizens and two staff workers before plowing head long into the swimming pool. He did make it out of prison just in time to be able to come to the premiere. The way I was conceived just may account for my fierce daredevil nature though. I love sky diving, bungee jumping, base jumping and extreme sports of any kind, including extreme digesting. I’ve also invented a new extreme sport, I’ve taken the rush associated with hang gliding and the confidence associated with having an enormous penis. I call it Hung Gliding.

And speaking of penises, what many people don’t know is that THE CHASE was not originally funded by 20th Century Fox, but by a porn company called Jack In The Crack Productions. They agreed to finance 100% of the movie as long as a hardcore version was simultaneously shot for the European release. Surprisingly, Sheen and Swanson both agreed and so we actually shot two completely different versions of THE CHASE, one where Sheen kidnaps Swanson and they’re chased by cops from Newport Beach down to Tijuana, and one version where Charlie shows up to Kristy’s dorm room dressed like a pizza delivery man. Unfortunately Fox bought the PG-13 version and buried the XXX version before the release. It’s a shame too; the alternate version had quite a climactic conclusion.

rifkin_pic_3thin

BOB: I’ve been a huge fan of The Chase since it was released, often thinking of it as kind of the comedic answer to Oliver Stone’s Natural Born Killers in relation to how the media’s absolute power corrupts absolutely. Is there any truth to my observation, or am I just a kook?

ADAM: Duh.

BOB: You played the lead in your film The Stoned Age in tribute to legends like Woody Allen and Mel Brooks. Is this something you could see yourself doing again in a future project?

ADAM: Yes, I wrote, directed and starred in HOMO ERECTUS (AKA National Lampoon’s STONED AGE), a comedy about a philosophical caveman who can’t get the girl (Ali Larter). I love acting and not only would I be interested in performing in more films of my own, but I’m actually starring in a slew of upcoming big studio releases. Now that the deals are signed and the release dates set, I can finally tell you about what I have in the hopper. I just signed on to play the lead in James Cameron’s new Avatar spin off. It’s a heart warming story about a mentally-challenged alien who helps inspire his tribe to be more tolerant to those with special needs, it’s called AVATARD. I’m also starring in Peter Jackson’s new film where I play a little boy who’s murdered and while my father tries desperately to solve my killing I’m accosted in the “in between place” by a group of NAMBLA members who also all died when their tour bus drove off a cliff coming home from a Jonas Brothers concert, it’s called THE LOVELY BONERS. I’ll also be appearing in Quentin Tarantino’s MALODOROUS ASS-TURDS and acclaimed porno director Fartin Squirtspraysee’s SHITTER ISLAND.

BOB: Detroit Rock City is one of my personal favorite comedies ever, as well as a rather touching coming-of-age tale. Did you listen to Kiss growing up?

ADAM: Yes I did listen to KISS when I was a kid, but I was a much bigger fan of Gene Simmons’ first band called OWL TURD HOOTENANNY. Similar to KISS but much more country sounding and a lot more songs about mouse eating. I also listened to my uncle Yortis who told me that urine was liquid sunshine.

BOB: In what warehouse does that enormous Gene Simmons POV-tongue lay dormant waiting for me to steal?

ADAM: It’s in the Smithsonian. You can find it in the same isle as Clarence Thomas’ pubic hair, Wilbur Wright’s nipple clamps and Benjamin Franklin’s peenee pants. (In addition to being one of the Founding Fathers, having invented the lightning rod and bifocals, he also invented a popular style of pants of the day called Peenee Pants, which enabled the wearer to expose his entire genital region with the unfastening of one strategically designed button-flap.)

BOB: Do you truly believe that “Disco Sucks!”?

ADAM: Disco does suck. But never on the first date. You might be lucky enough to get a peck on the lips. Date two might involve some genuine tongue kissing and possibly some boob squeezing outside the shirt, but only if the dinner and conversation before hand was comfortable and intellectually stimulating. The third date might involve some moderate petting but don’t push it because date four is definitely when Disco gets oral. And Disco has the biggest, fattest, softest, wettest, lips around, so it’s worth the wait!

BOB: You work with many of the same talented people over and over again such as Miles Dougal, Natasha Lyonne, Ron Jeremy and Giuseppe Andrews. Do you write with them in mind, or do you just cast all your friends who also happen to be very talented?

ADAM: First of all let’s clear something up right here and now. The words “Ron Jeremy” and “talented” are never to be uttered in the same sentence together again. Ron’s so fat, he doesn’t have an hour glass figure, he’s got a 24 hour glass figure. Ron’s so fat, when the judge said “order”, Ron jumped up and screamed “two chili cheeseburgers and a Cherry Coke!” Ron’s so fat, when he wears a yellow rain coat people yell, “Taxi!” Ron’s so fat, when he lays on the beach Greenpeace shows up and drags him back in the water. Ron’s so fat, it beeps when he backs up…

As far as the others, I use the people I feel are talented and that I know I can rely on. And yes, when I know someone is good, I’ll often write roles with them in mind. Miles Dougal, for example, not only is a classically trained Shakespearean actor with degrees from both Juilliard and Yale School Of Drama, but he’s also the only actor to ever win an Oscar, a Golden Globe, a Grammy, a Tony, and the Triple Crown all in the same year. We went to high school together so I know his strengths and weaknesses and I can tailor roles to the aspects of his talent that others may be unaware of. Like his ability to be able to fart the song Wipe Out. But you’ll learn all these tid-bits about Miles and so many more when the Ken Burns documentary series about him airs on PBS this fall.

…Ron’s so fat, his high school photo was a helicopter shot. Ron’s so fat, the animals at the zoo feed HIM. Ron’s so fat, they found Jimmy Hoffa stuck in his crack. Ron’s so fat, when he farts on Tuesday the sound doesn’t come out until Friday. Ron’s so fat, when the weatherman said it was chilly out he ran outside with a spoon…

BOB: >Can we ever hope to see a flick based on the Shmobots?

ADAM: Yes. Since the graphic novel has done so well and gotten so many fantastic reviews, we are currently prepping a host of ways to capitalize on those lovable pot smoking slacker robots called SHMOBOTS. There’s a Broadway musical in the works as well as a $200 million epic movie that will star Will Smith as the cantankerous Rusty and Ben Kingsley as the nerdily efficient Eyeballs The Robot. Though controversial, we’re also developing an extensive SHMOBOTS weapons program with the United States Military that will be funneled through the Boeing munitions contract. I’m not at liberty to discuss that one in any more detail than I’ve already divulged.

BOB: Night At The Golden Eagle seemed to be a big change of pace for you, and a very artistically successful one at that. Did you get a lot of pleasantly confused reactions from those that normally view you as a comedy filmmaker?

ADAM: The reactions were varied, but interesting. Here is a selection of some of the reviews we got at the time of the film’s release:

“NIGHT AT THE GOLDEN EAGLE, by the usually very funny filmmaker Adam Rifkin, delved so deeply and so effectively into the pits of human despair and emotional darkness, that my penis literally wrapped itself around my own testicles and squeezed them like an anaconda, so hard, cutting off all circulation for the duration of the brilliant film, I was left not only emotionally drained from the movie, but sterile.”
– A. O. Scott, NEW YORK TIMES

“NIGHT AT THE GOLDEN EAGLE is such a powerful and captivating exploration into the sinister side of the human condition that after seeing it I sold all of my worldly possessions and moved to Addis Ababa where I now live as an Ethiopian street mime.”
– Peter Travers, ROLLING STONE

“Adam Rifkin’s inspired NIGHT AT THE GOLDEN EAGLE may very well be the greatest movie ever made. I foolishly walked into the screening thinking Rifkin was only capable of comedy, I now realize he is not only capable of drama as well, but he’s a master of it. I also feel it imperative to mention that my farts smell suspiciously like Chinese food, which is odd because I haven’t eaten Chinese food for at least 3 months.”
– Roger Ebert, CHICAGO SUN TIMES

“NIGHT AT THE GOLDEN EAGLE is that rare once in a lifetime movie that makes you want to fill your underpants with ants!”
– Gene Shalit, TODAY

BOB: Your film LOOK deals with a subject made possible by this new era of digital photography. As a filmmaker do you have a stance on the Digital vs. Film debate, or has it just come down to another factor where budget is concerned?

ADAM: Dandruff. Browdruff. Lashdruff. Burndruff. Bearddruff. Stachdruff. Pitdruff. Pubedruff. Backdruff. Now there’s a Head N Shoulders for each!

BOB: With your cult classic The Dark Backward in mind: What if Adam Rifkin wakes up tomorrow morning and finds an arm growing out the center of his back? What is his next move? Will this discovery ruin his breakfast?

ADAM: I try not to deal in hypotheticals, only facts. And here are 9 facts that you may find interesting:

1. All Norwegians smear pudding on their genitals before taking a driving test.
2. Every time an angel farts a hobo gets his wings. It’s rare, but it does happen. Have you ever heard an angel fart? It’s the most indescribably beautiful sound I’ve ever heard. To fart without sin is the purest form of love.
3. If you take cranberries and stew them like applesauce, they taste much more like prunes than rhubarb does.
4. Moses had a gay brother named Homoses.
5. The American West had a famous gay Indian chief named Geronihomo.

6. One of the most famous gay books on whaling was Homoby Dick.

7. Che Guevara’s gay exploits were explored in The Homotorcycle Diaries.

8. The Gay Three stooges are Homoe, Fairy and Shirley.

9. 1960’s Black music underwent a gay Renaissance when Fairy Gordy founded Homotown Records.

10. Supposedly Jesus’ farts smelled like rainbows ““ a fact suppressed by Vatican procto-theologians for centuries because it could be misconstrued as “too gay” (*see: the lost book of Homoses).

BOB: You’ve worked with personal heroes of mine, legendary directors John Landis and Joe Dante. Was their early work influential on you in your youth or when first becoming a director yourself?

ADAM: Yes, but interestingly enough, their films are only part of the reason I find them inspiring. What many people may not know is that John Landis, in addition to being a renowned filmmaker, is also the world champion in Extreme Origami. He’s the only Westerner to ever win the Gamibowl twelve years in a row. The thousand’s year old competition is held annually in Osaka Japan and is the most popular sporting event in the Eastern Hemisphere. This year he again took home the coveted Saikaku award for his incredibly intricate and staggeringly accurate Origami interpretation of the Peloponnesian Wars.

Additionally, Joe Dante is much more than just a popular filmmaker; he’s the guy who invented tweezers.

BOB: As a lover of quality family comedies I am a fan of both Mouse Hunt and Small Soldiers. Who would win in a cage-match between Chip Hazard and The Mouse?

ADAM: When Ben Kingsley asked me that very same question on the set of GHANDI 2: ELECTRIC HUNDU POO, I told him to kindly tickle my balls with a cat whisker and recite the “Trench Coat Crappletree” speech from William Shakespeare’s THE UNDERPANTALOON GANG DOTH GO BANANAS. He then promptly slit his throat with one of his own pubic hairs and bled out all over my brand new Chuck Taylor Negrons.

cid_2ee79361-b792-45b7-ae03-5afb6f9ffb92

BOB: I’ve read about your upcoming LOOK television series, Perhaps you could tell our readers a little bit about the show and also let us know if there are any other future projects you have in the pipeline that you would like to unleash on the world at this moment?

ADAM: LOOK The Series is based on the critically acclaimed and multi award winning motion picture I made of the same name that came out in 2008. It explores the conceit that the average American is captured on surveillance camera over 200 times a day. The film (and now the series) follows multiple story lines, but what hopefully makes LOOK unique is that it’s shot entirely with surveillance cameras. It’s a show about voyeurism, privacy and the things that people do when they don’t think they’re being watched. “Look” for LOOK The Series later this year on Showtime.

I also wrote a comedy that comes out later this year called KNUCKLEHEAD and I’m currently writing a big kid’s movie for Disney.

Oh, and I’ve been sewing body parts together in my basement for the last several months in an attempt to create a special friend who will never yell at me, never judge me and always wanna play when I wanna play and what I wanna play. I’ve named him Erwin and whenever he does something funny I always say, “Oh Erwin!”.

BOB: Thank you for taking the time to answer my questions, it’s very much appreciated. One last question: How many MYSTERY shirts do you own and where can I get one?

ADAM: No problem. Anytime. And yeah, I do own a lot of MYSTERY shirts. They’re made by a skate wear company in San Diego called Black Box. They really loved DETROIT ROCK CITY so they took the logo from the garage band that the kids had in the movie. As you know I wear MYSTERY shirts all the time. So does my girlfriend. I don’t know if you guys noticed but she has enormous natural breasts. Huge pendulous 19 year old udders that defy gravity. Giant fun bags that bounce when she walks, jiggle when she laughs and sway with a jello-like spring when she’s getting plowed from behind. Her cup size is double-D but grow to E during certain glorious times of the month. They’re extremely sensitive to the touch and she can practically be brought to orgasm just by licking her number 2 pencil eraser-like nipples. Sometimes I just curl up in her lap and suckle those commodious honkers of hers like a starving Ethiopian baby, “Mama”, I’ll squeak, my dewy eyes just staring up at her with innocent awe. I mean, I’m not kidding when I say this girl has capacious hooters, voluminous melons, walloping whoppers, humongous bazookas, Herculean bikini babies, immense amounts of sweater meat, colossal, thundering mammarial mountains, massively mammoth tatas, a Goliathly, monolithic dairy section…seriously dude, she got some big ol’ titties! And she’s really sweet too. Gotta run now but next time I’ll tell you a little about her ass.

—————————————————————–

That’s the end folks. Thank you to Adam Rifkin for his “spirited” interview. If you would like to read, hear, see (or feel?) more from Mr. Rifkin check out the links throughout the interview and the ones that follow this sentence…this one…yes, the one you’re reading…here comes the period.

Adam Rifkin at TRAILERS FROM HELL

Sneek Peek at TALES FROM THE SCRIPT

Buy TALES FROM THE SCRIPT

Thanks for reading!

February 6, 2010

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Caissie St. Onge

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I chat with a very funny writer/producer who traces her career from THE LATE SHOW WITH DAVID LETTERMAN through THE ROSIE O’DONNELL SHOW to THE BEST WEEK EVER (and its Paul F. Tompkins-helmed successor). There are plenty of other stops along the way, and plenty of irons in the fire, so sit back & listen to me chat w/ the very funny Caissie St. Onge.

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Caissie St. Onge“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-caissie_st_onge.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

February 2, 2010

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & The Dawson Bros.

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I chat with the UK writing trio The Dawson Bros. – Andrew Dawson, Steve Dawson, & Tim Inman – who’ve toiled in obscurity behind the scenes of THE PETER SERAFINOWICZ SHOW, TOTAL WIPEOUT, Funny Or Die UK (and much more), and are about to unleash their sketch pilot, HAPPY FINISH, in the near future.

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & The Dawson Bros.“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-dawson_bros.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

January 16, 2010

FROM THE VAULT: An Interview with Stephen Colbert

Filed under: A Bit Of A Chat With Ken Plume,Interviews — Tags: , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 10:02 am

vaultinterviews.png

Heya folks – Ken Plume here, with an interview from the vaults. I interviewed Stephen Colbert towards the middle of 2003, when it was still possible to set up an in-depth piece with Stephen that wasn’t destined for Entertainment Weekly or The New York Times.

I had followed Colbert ever since I’d seen him as a castmember of the short-lived Dana Carvey Show (bonus points if you can spot me in one of the episode openings), and I kept track of him as he moved on to Exit 57, Strangers With Candy, and then his regular spot as a correspondent on the original Craig Kilborn version of The Daily Show.

When I did this in-depth piece with Stephen, The Daily Show – under Jon Stewart – had begun to take off, and was fast becoming a strong voice in the political and journalistic landscape.

Below, you’ll find my original introduction to the piece, and then my rather large-ish chat with Stephen.

lucyline.gif

Stephen Colbert is perhaps best known as one of the senior correspondents for Comedy Central’s The Daily Show.

Comedy fans, however, also know him as co-creator/writer/star (alongside Amy Sedaris & Paul Dinello) of Comedy Central’s decidedly surreal take-off on preachy afterschool specials, Strangers with Candy (the complete first season of which recently made its DVD debut).

Perhaps less well-known, he co-created (with Robert Smigel) The Ambiguously Gay Duo, providing the voice of Ace to boot. And speaking of cartoon voices, he also does a few for Cartoon Network’s Harvey Birdman, Attorney at Law.

Colbert’s first book, co-written with Sedaris and Dinello, has recently hit book shelves the world over. Wigfield is a somewhat disturbing, completely hilarious view of a small town’s triumphantly pathetic struggle to survive.

A Strangers with Candy movie is on the horizon – until then, though, here’s our in-depth interview with everyone’s favorite fake news anchor…

KEN PLUME: Am I correct in understanding that you’re from South Carolina originally?

STEPHEN COLBERT: I am.

PLUME: Am I also correct in understanding that as a high school student, you weren’t terribly motivated?

COLBERT: Oh no, I was not. I was motivated to play Dungeons & Dragons. I mean highly, highly motivated to play it.

PLUME: How often?

COLBERT: Every day, if I could find someone to play with me. If I couldn’t find someone to play with me, I would work on my player character.

PLUME: That was the heyday of D&D, wasn’t it?

COLBERT: It was, actually. I started playing Dungeons & Dragons the first week it was introduced to the market – at least the first week it was introduced down here. Before Dungeons & Dragons, there was a game called Metamorphosis Alpha, which was also created by Gary Gygax, the guy who created Dungeons & Dragons. I played that, and then we heard this other thing was going to be coming out, called Dungeons & Dragons. The first week it was out, we played it and we were hooked. That was in 1977, I think.

PLUME: What was the big difference between the two that appealed to you?

COLBERT: Well, the difference between the two was Metamorphosis Alpha was Dungeons & Dragons in space, and Dungeons & Dragons was sorcery. I was a huge fan – I read a lot of sorcery.

PLUME: So a big Lord of the Rings fan?

COLBERT: Lord of the Rings, Stephen R. Donaldson, Fritz Leiber – you know, Fafhrd and the Gray Mouser series. Gosh, who else? I can’t believe I can’t remember more of them. Michael Moorcock, The Chronicles of Corum, the Elric – so many.

PLUME: What would the teenager of then think of the Lord of the Rings films?

COLBERT: Well, that part of me is not dead, really. He would be just as apprehensive as I was, before the first film came out. Really, really, really hoping – excited, obviously – but really, really hoping that they don’t blow it. Because they were going to go in with a big enough budget, they were going to create some pretty startling images, and you didn’t want those images to replace the images in your mind.

PLUME: I’m assuming you had bad memories of the Bakshi film.

COLBERT: Oh gosh. That was really important to me at the time, when the Bakshi film came out, and that was pretty devastating. There’s no way – I couldn’t see an upside to that one at all.

PLUME: Yeah, I don’t think there was much of an upside to that.

COLBERT: No. But this one, I have some friends who work at New Line, and so when this film was coming out, they got me into early screenings and that kind of stuff. Like the 28 minute trailer that was shown to press ahead of time. The summer before the movie came out, I saw that 28 minute trailer. I was just shaking by the end of it, I was so excited, at the end of the Moria sequence. They have the unedited, like, 18 minute Moria sequence – uncut 18 minute sequence at the center of it. I was blown away. It wasn’t how I imagined it, and it was fine.

PLUME: Have the films continued to impress you?

COLBERT: I was a little distressed in the second film by what they did with Faramir.

PLUME: Oh, the evilization?

COLBERT: The fact that he succumbs to the power of the ring. Or not so much the power of the ring as he succumbs to …

PLUME: He’s a bit of a bastard in the film.

COLBERT: Well, in the film, he says, “You’re going to Gondor.” I thought, “No, no, no!” One of the greatest moments in the book is when he looks at the ring, he knows what it is, and he says, “Alas for my brother, Boromir. He loved Gondor too much. He was willing to take this thing and use it, but I told you if I found this thing by the side of the road I would not pick it up. And I’m a man of my word.” You know, it changes his tone completely. Then, they go to Osgiliath, where they have this encounter with the Nazgul that doesn’t happen in the book, and then Faramir just changes his mind? Like, the one person in the history of Middle Earth, who when confronted with possession of the ring just changes his mind at some point? That was really heartbreaking.

PLUME: He’s a bit flighty.

COLBERT: Yeah, and actually, I went to go see the world premiere of that, because they had it in New York, and as I’m walking out, a friend of mine who went with me – he knew I was sort of obsessed with the books – said – and I was really upset – said, “So, what did you think?” But Brad Dourif, who plays Grima Wormtongue, was standing right next to me. I couldn’t say anything. I was like, “It was good. It was good.” But then I saw it a second time and I managed to leap that particular puddle, and loved it. I mean, it’s wonderful – but there’s so much that they don’t cover.

PLUME: I think the second film is the most radical departure from the text.

COLBERT: Well I hope so, because that third film’s got a lot riding on it.

PLUME: Of course, who knows what the extra 40 minutes on the deluxe DVD are going to add back in…

COLBERT: Yeah, who knows?

PLUME: Gosh, where did we get off on this tangent?

COLBERT: Oh yeah – “So you weren’t a good student.”

PLUME: Was there anything besides that that interested you? Was there any inkling of performing or writing?

COLBERT: I used to write things for friends. There was this girl I had a crush on, and she had a teacher she didn’t like at school. I had a real crush on her, so almost every day I would write her a little short story where she would kill him in a different way. But, in sort of a James Bond-ian kind of explosives in the gas tank of his car kind of way.

PLUME: Of course, those kind of letters today would have gotten you thrown out of school.

COLBERT: They really would have. They really would have. And all I was doing was I was just trying to impress a girl. I can’t tell you how many of those I wrote. I wonder whether she kept them. I’d love to see them.

PLUME: Put them in a collection?

COLBERT: Or hide them. And I wrote things for the school’s newspaper, and – like all teenagers – I dabbled in poetry.

PLUME: Dabbled in a lot of poetry directed towards this girl as well?

COLBERT: No. I should have… that would have been much wiser. I hear girls are weak for that sort of thing.

PLUME: I guess few people realized just what a creative enterprise role-playing was at that time.

COLBERT: Yeah, nobody realized it. They thought it was warping their children’s minds. Which it might have been, but it also took a lot of creativity to play it.

PLUME: Well how many of those people now are multi-millionaires… or were, before the Internet bubble burst….

COLBERT: Right.

PLUME: So, would you say that your parents pushed you in any one direction, or they were just hoping that you would find a direction?

COLBERT: No, they were just hoping that I would find a direction. Just very supportive of what I eventually decided to try to do. But would have been perfectly happy if I had been lawyer or been a potter.

PLUME: Just something productive?

COLBERT: Just something that could pay the rent.

PLUME: Was it difficult getting into Hampden-Sydney?

COLBERT: Oh no, it was not. It was easy to get in, hard to stay. They accept a lot of people, but they failed a huge percentage of the freshman class.

PLUME: So was it a bait and switch?

COLBERT: No, it was a “playtime’s over” kind of place.

PLUME: They lure you in with easy admittance …

COLBERT: And then they hammered you. It was really hard work. I would have to say it was harder at Hampden-Sydney than it was Northwestern.

PLUME: At any point were you on the verge of dropping out?

COLBERT: No, no, no, no. I did very well. I applied myself.

PLUME: How much of a wakeup call was it?

COLBERT: I knew that I had never been applying myself when I was in high school, and so I knew that this was my last chance. So, I worked very hard. The hardest part was I didn’t have the disciplinary skills. I didn’t have the self-discipline, so it took a lot more time to do the work I needed to do than it took the better students.

PLUME: How long did it take to finally learn that discipline?

COLBERT: Probably my freshman year. By the time I got to my sophomore year, I realized that you actually had to be like an Ovaltine commercial. You had to finish classes, come back to your room, and immediately start working. Then, after that was over, then it was playtime.

PLUME: I’ve never really heard of Hampden-Sydney being a party school …

COLBERT: Well, it was to a certain extent, but I wasn’t Greek. I didn’t become part of the fraternity system, which is where that would happen – and I purposely didn’t join them, so I would work harder.

PLUME: What was the major that you were leaning towards there?

COLBERT: I don’t know. Philosophy is what I took most classes in.

PLUME: So, nothing that would have been applicable after college.

COLBERT: No …

Continued below…

January 15, 2010

Trailer Park: Zachary Levi – Part 2

By Christopher Stipp

The Archives, Right Here

I was able to sit down for a couple of years and pump out a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

Check out my new column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

Departures DVD – Review

dep

The fact that this film beat out Waltz with Bashir and The Class at last year’s Academy Awards should be an indication of how good Departures really is. Not saying it should be a sticker on its box cover but it is a compelling fact on top of the one that this is really that good.

For those who need the CliffsNotes version of the story it is thus: A talented musician/father, Daigo (Masahiro Motoki), takes solace in his music as a professional cellist. When he finds himself in the unemployment line after his orchestra goes bankrupt, with no work and no way to make ends meet, the family packs up and moves back to his hometown where he grew up as a boy. With no prospects for any kind of musical employment Daigo answers an ad to help prepare dead bodies. Hiding the job from his wife, learning what it means to be alive, learning what it means to die, all play into a story that is at the same time satisfying and slightly inspiring.

Where director Yojiro Takita genuinely excels is crafting a movie that is at once affirming and interesting. This is Daigo’s story, to be sure, but the way in which we navigate the waters of personal grief that never overpowers the notion that this is Daigo’s tale to tell shows how well Takita can back off when he needs to, never pushing a schmaltzy Frank Capra-esque “It’s great to be alive!” kind of agenda. The action is understated and always very aware of itself. Sometimes, it’s too aware and the way in which Daigo finds his own way to enlightenment about his own life, and the many things that have held him back for so many years as an adult, and it is this, I feel, is where the Academy really saw something in this film.

True, there is nothing new here about the emotional state of mankind that made this an absolute shoo-in to win an Oscar, The Class had a much more direct and profound statement to make, but it is a film that transcends so many boundaries and does get at the inane blocks we sometimes place on ourselves. The movie is great because it doesn’t get bogged down with the superfluous but it also misses an opportunity to delve deeper into the emotional core of our character; while we see a lot of ourselves in this film, you understand, there should have been more we see of Daigo’s own transformation. There is no way you can go wrong with a viewing of this film and more than deserves a few of your rental dollars. What it has to say and show about death, mortality, and the unique preparation of our corporeal bodies, is enough to warrant a couple of hours of your time here on earth.

Zachary Levi – Interview- Part 2

It’s hard to look into the future when it comes to broadcasting but Zach Levi knows enough that it could be mistaken for yet another one of Chuck’s skills. Star of the program that bears his likeness in so many promos that you wonder whether the network is trading in the peacock for his delicate mug, Levi has a lot to say when it comes to reflecting on the previous seasons of the show. As well, he’s more than an open book to discuss what happens when the very same network pushing your show on the viewers of the channel whacks your budget and the effects it has on those who act in it. There was more than enough of the Straight Talk Express to go around and Levi let loose, literally not letting me get a word in edgewise. When last we left off with Levi, he was explaining what happened when he visited jolly ol’ England to talk about the show months ago, on the verge of cancellation, and ended up becoming a Sandwich Artist for the day.

Chuck is now back to its normal time on Monday, 8/7C on NBC

chuck1LEVI: So it was right around the corner from where the convention was and Adam and I had a panel on Saturday. We already talked about Chuck and we were supposed to have another panel with another actor who didn’t end up making the convention so it was just going to be me.  And I said I didn’t want to just sit up there and say the same things so I said, “Hey, instead of me just talking, who wants to go walk over to Subway and have some sandwiches?”

And, literally, almost everyone at the convention got up and went over to Subway.

Then we got over there and I ordered a sandwich and the people at Subway said, “Would you like to come back and make it a photo op and make a sandwich?”  So I said “Yeah” and I went back behind the counter and made a sandwich and I was in the middle of the production line, bur I ended up making about 250 sandwiches.  It was so surreal.  I’m in a Subway, in England, with a bunch of my fellow nerds at a convention that is part of this grassroots campaign, people I’ve never seen before, and here we are.  And then that got traction and it went out to everybody at Warner Bros. and NBC and I just don’t know, man.

It’s a unique and special thing to be a part of and I feel like later in my career I hope to be a part of something that special ““ be a part of things that are so symbiotic with the fans ““ the people that means the most too.  You can be out there and make great stuff and good movies and all that but to be in the trenches with them ““ to see if a miracle does happen ““ and it did happen.

CS:  It did.  I can’t imagine what that did for you knowing that this was all going on and your job was in the balance publicly.  If I was about to get fired and everyone knew about it, I don’t know how I would hold myself together.  It must be a unique position for you. But now that you have your third season, do you have an idea of where this third season is going to go when you kick back up again?  Was there always a third season tentatively written?

LEVI: I am sure that they had ideas and a good idea of the overall premise of where the third season would go.  But, when the future is that uncertain, I don’t know how much time as a writer, and I am, but I’ve never been in their particular shoes, where it’s like, “OK we have two seasons under our belts.  How much time are we going to dedicate to cracking stories?”  It could be all for naught, you know?  But I know that certainly the second season was left as a cliff hanger.  The second season I download the new intersect 2.0 and at least temporarily have kung-fu and that’s the last line.  I know kung-fu and we’re out.  You just can’t “¦Everybody was, “Oh my god, what the heck is going on?”  It’s crazy.  And because Chuck, why it’s a special show for the Comic-Con crowd is because Chuck is the Comic-Con goer.  If you look in our art department, my room is litered with Comi-Con badges by my desk.  So I feel the fun of the show is that they get to live vicariously through Chuck and vicariously they get to learn kung-fu as we go into the third season you find out that these powers are fleeting.  The intersect has its glitches.  It was not meant for me.  It was meant for Bryce Larkin who is already a super secret agent and is cool…so I don’t have the capability to turn it on and off.

Whether it’s fighting skills or speaking another language or playing an instrument or operating machinery, whatever the case may be, it’s all these physical attributes that Chuck now has the power to tap into but they only last for a certain amount of time and so we’ll get some great action out of it but then at the same time there will be some great comedy because of those moments where, for example, we’re on a mission and a couple of big baddies step up and I say “Guys, I got this” and I strike my pose but nothing is happening and these guys are coming to beat the crap out of me or something like that.  It is certainly not at will, kind of happens as it does, and it’s perfect because if I could just retain kung-fu the show wouldn’t make any sense anymore.  I have to be the everyman.

If I, all of a sudden, could protect myself, Casey and Sarah, we wouldn’t need them anymore.  I would just be a secret agent.  I wouldn’t have a home life anymore, so there goes my sister and Awesome and Morgan and everybody.  But this way we’ve opened this new door of all these possibilities and Josh and Chris and the rest of our writers have done an excellent job of setting up that world and now in the third season they are just going to dive into it.  I’m sure they have all kind of fun ideas.

CS:  Exactly.  Going back to the idea that fans…when you are out talking and people are talking to you, why do so many people, in your opinion, embrace the show and feel like it’s their show?  What is it about it that people really want to protect?

Zachary LeviLEVI: I think that A) it is the element that Chuck is one of them and I feel partly that like Josh and I, we are Chuck and Morgan, not entirely, but when we say we’re gamers, we are genuine gamers.  And I think that there is an honesty that comes through in that and that’s not a pat on our back by any means but certainly I feel like the audience feels less duped.  I feel like they get to watch the characters and feel like that these guys are like that too.  They are on Xbox and like comic books ““ so on a personal level I think they are invested in us too which I think is a really awesome thing.  But then on top of that I think it’s an entertaining show and speaks to the fanboy and fangirl.  We nod to and allude to, not rip off”¦

(Laughs)

But certainly a homage to so many of the classic either spy movies, sci-fi movies or fantasy, we’re like Sandworm from Dune, whatever.  We have great guest stars that are all from that world, or many of them are.  Like Scott Bakula playing my dad, that’s huge, or Trisha Helfer came on and played an agent on the show.  Any bit that we give I feel it’s our duty to do that because I think it’s staying true to our fan base ““ gives them more reason to stay with it.  Then, on top of that, aside from the fanboy/fangirl Comic-Con world, paired with that the show itself has a really big family audience because we’re an 8:00 o’clock show so you can’t do too much that’s too risqué, although some of the lingerie”¦ But one of the coolest things I’ve gotten out of this whole experience on Chuck is how many parents have come up to me for 3 years now, or 2 going into our 3rd, just saying, “Thank you.  Thank you that you have given me and my kids an hour of television that we get to sit down and hang out together and we watch the show and we all dig it.  We all dig it for different reasons.  My son loves the action and we love the whole spy world stuff.  It’s so silly and fun.”  Or some moms say, “I think Alan Baldwin is the sexist man alive.”  Whatever.

And a lot of gamers are really into the Chuck Morgan stuff hoping that we get to bring that bromance and best buddy stuff back and just speaking to the nerds and speaking to everybody with the multi-genre thing, we are a cornucopia of genre which is very difficult to balance and, quite frankly, a pain in the ass sometimes, but that’s what makes the show unique.  There is nothing like Chuck on television.  There’s just nothing like it.  And that’s not necessarily a good thing it’s just ““ it is.  It’s a mini movie every week and we speak to genre people and we speak to sci-fi people and we speak to gamers and nerds and speak to families and even the guy/guys out there who say the girls are, “So hot on your show.”  I think it’s all that stuff…We get these people and get a lot of them.  I think we get a lot of different people and get a little bit of everybody and it makes it a very kind of different and dynamic show.  And, on top of all of that, I think the reason why people are with us and stay with us and are invested in the show is because now they have genuinely become a part of our survival and our livelihood.  They are the crucial part of why we are still around and I think it’s the best kind of situation you can be a part of because you know that it’s worth something at the end of the day.

I love acting.  I love what I get to do.  I hope I get to do it for the rest of my life but certainly there are many, many times where I’m doing it and saying, “Does this really mean anything? ” There are guys and girls overseas defending our freedoms abroad.  Those guys are putting their lives on the line.  That means something.  Or Caltrans guys working on the sides of the roads keeping the freeways going, those jobs do something.  I’m an entertainer.  What does that mean at the end of the day?  But, for an hour a week, you bring a smile to somebody’s face and it’s not just a smile.  It’s a smile that is rooted so deeply and they are willing to offer up their time and energy to keep it going because they want that smile or they want those tears in those dramatic moments we have.  They want that adrenaline in those action packed moments.

This whole weekend, especially today after our panel, it’s just humbling.  Everything has been very humbling.  It certainly gives me a renewed appreciation for what we do and I want to be able to just keep this going and carry that to the next 13 episodes and just make them awesome and keep giving the fans what they want.

CS:  Going into the 3rd season, knowing how number 2 turned out, fate being what it is with the show, does Chuck need to change in order to stay afloat?

0000043360_20070924122705LEVI: We’ve already seen some changes and those changes have all been kind of monetary, budget restricting changes which is across the board, really.  Some shows didn’t come back at all because they just couldn’t work it on with the budget or they were already on season 7 and it’s like…look, Without a Trace for example was in the top 10 shows or something and it didn’t come back.  That was making huge numbers and far bigger numbers than us.  So across the board, studios, networks, everybody feels it so I, as tough as it is sometimes, would be like, “Come on, give us a little bit of love.”

I know that sometimes the buck just gets passed and passed and passed and it just has to be.  So we’ve seen that already. Take Josh Gomez, he was in all the shows produced and now it’s 11 of 13.  So he’s not in every episode but he’s going to be in the majority of the episodes.  I think Adam, Yvonne, and I are the only ones all shows produced.  And that’s a bummer.  When the show first started to me it was like, it’s Chuck torn between his family life and his new spy life.  It was Adam and Yvonne on this side and it was Josh and Sarah on this side.  So to see somebody come and get demoted, if you will, that bums me out for Josh.  Not just for his pocketbook, although you do feel that, obviously.  But just kind of on a that’s just sucks.  Not fun news to hear.  But, Julia Ling, who played Anna Wu, she’s not on the show at all.  And I know they have reached out to her and said “We’d like for you to come back and guest star” but she might have other things she’s working on.  I don’t know.  So that kind of stuff is tough.

Our overall budget has been cut half a million dollars.  And we were already in a place where getting the job done where we were was tough in the time and money we had allotted.  Now we lost a day on our schedule and we lost a good portion of our budget so it’ll be interesting.  I don’t know how but I believe that it can, I know we will.  There is no turning back.  We have 13 episodes to do and this is the money we have to do it.

You just have to have faith that whatever is meant to be is meant to be and we will still be able to produce the show if fans are with.  And at the end of the day, I don’t think we’ll lose fans because we didn’t go to a location necessarily.

LEVI: You lose people when you stop being true to the characters.  And stop being true to the relationships.  And stop being true to what the heart is all about.  And I think also because our fans are now so very in on ““ pretty much everybody knows that we lost money in the budget, Josh Schwartz was in today talking about it at the panel.  We had budget cuts and blah blah blah so I think fans will give you a pass.  As long as it doesn’t look like it was shot on a camcorder.

(Laughs)

And as long as everybody stays true to the heart of what the show is about and we’re still doing everything we can to make it the best show we can.  I think they will stay with us.  I don’t think they’d come this far and then say, “Ah, whatever.”Â  Look at a show like Heroes.  Yes, they slipped a little bit in their numbers but they went through some rocky times.  The first season it was the biggest thing in the world.  And then it wasn’t exactly the show people loved the first season.  It was different.  Some people thought “I don’t know, I like this version more” and they tried to come back in the third season and now a fourth season and they still have a full packed hall at Comic-Con.  So, the dedicated fans will stay.  They invested that time.

chuck_nbc_tv_show_image_zachary_levi_and_yvonne_strahovskiI am a huge fan of Lost.  And when they hit ““ I thought second season was fantastic.  The first half of the third season, had maybe writer changes, but you are not getting the mythology, not getting questions answered, just more and more questions, but not questions at all, just day to day living and I’m like, “Come on, what’s going on?’  And then they went on hiatus and came back and the second half of the third season was some of the best television I ever saw in my entire life.  I was like, “YES, here’s my show.”  And I felt good because I didn’t give up, I could have, but I didn’t and you feel good that you stayed and it’s still to me the best show on TV.  I love Lost.  I can’t wait to find out what’s going to happen.  I’m dying.

CS:  Last question:  You’ve been a very public face for Chuck.  Why have you taken such an active role in coming out and stumping and being who you are regarding Chuck’s fate in the public sphere. What part of your personality does that come from?

LEVI: Thank you.  I appreciate that.  I think it’s a couple of things.

I think A) it’s just the way God made me but, hey, everybody’s got different things.  Some people ““ I don’t fault anybody for not – people have different personalities and I’ve always been an outgoing gregarious guy anyway.  But I feel it’s a particular paradigm from the beginning of when I started my career ““ and it’s funny because I was just talking to somebody about this today but again I don’t fault anybody because we’re all different ““ some artists are very close and they are just more introverted types of people or something and that’s them and that’s cool and rock and roll.  I feel like some people their philosophy on the business is the less you give the more they want so they hold back.  You don’t know anything about Johnny Depp so you want to more about Johnny Depp.  I don’t even know if that’s who Johnny Depp is but he’s a mysterious kind of guy.

But it really started with the first show I did, Less than Perfect.  Somebody I was talking to said “You shouldn’t really open up too much to fans because the more you give the less they’ll want” or something.  I was new and I thought about it for a second and thought, “Whatever.”  But for me, if I can just maintain ,for multiple reasons,  as a regular person, that’s the most I can do.  Who knows?  In 20 years,  if I continue to be blessed and I continue to work and do good things and my star rises, if you will, and it gets really nutty so that I can’t even walk on the floor at Comic-Con without getting attacked or something, things happen and you have to start making boundaries so you don’t die.  But, until then, I say be you.  Take every opportunity that you can to thank people and be there with them.  Honestly, I feel like any opportunity that you can share a bit of you you can gain a support for your whole career.  Not that you do it for that reason but the reason behind it is because you know how much they care.  You know how much it means to them.

Somebody could be having the worst day of their life but they see you ““ I can see someone on the floor at Comic-Con and they tried to go talk to so-and-so or they don’t have enough money to go buy the comic they wanted and they are just kind of moping around, and all of a sudden they look up and they say “Hey, you’re Chuck. Can I take a picture?” and I say “Yeah, whatever, I’ll take a picture with you” and for the rest of the weekend they are on Cloud Nine”¦or maybe not”¦they could be saying, “Oh, burn it!”

(Laughs)

You don’t know.  But I feel like until you have to build walls I think it’s the wrong way to go.  And, again, you have to be careful.  People do want a lot from you and some people don’t know where that’s it’s OK to stop.  And fortunately I have friends and family around me that will be there for me and give me a little tap on the shoulder like, “Hey, we got to go because we’ll be here forever.”

I don’t know.  It’s just my philosophy.  You take things as they come.  I mean, I’m in the UK with a Subway around the corner, and Wendy, who started the campaign to save the show, is there. “What are you going to do for the finale tomorrow?” she asked. I responded, “Guess I’ll go to Subway and ask if anyone wants to go.”  But if that didn’t happen…maybe there was no Subway around the corner…maybe Wendy wasn’t there.  Then it probably wouldn’t have happened.  I don’t know.  But I just think you have to be open to what can be done or what should be done.  In that particular moment, you take it moment by moment sometimes and just try to be as honest and as real and hopefully as loving as you can.

No matter what, even if the show didn’t get picked up, I feel like it was still the right thing to do.

January 11, 2010

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Jonathan Coulton

Filed under: A Bit Of A Chat With Ken Plume,Interviews — Tags: , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 4:23 am

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I chat with cyber-troubadour Jonathan Coulton – an evil, evil man who must be destroyed.

Why this call to action? Because he’s immensely talented, an amazingly gifted songwriter, and his incredible creativity both intimidates a normal, ungifted person like myself and drives me to distraction with catchy tunes and wordplay.

Damn him to hell, I can’t stop listening to his music.

That includes his first album Smoke Monkey, his first EP, Where Tradition Meets Tomorrow, the complete 4-disc collection of his online songwriting experiment, Thing-a-Week, and his greatest hits compilation JoCo Looks Back.

You can purchase all of his discs, plus other merch – as well as partake of more sonic goodness – at www.JonathanCoulton.com. While you’re over there, be sure to check out all 52 Things – and pick up his CDs. And pledge your life to him. That talented bastard.

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Jonathan Coulton“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-jonathan_coulton.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

January 8, 2010

Trailer Park: Zachary Levi – Part 1

By Christopher Stipp

The Archives, Right Here

I was able to sit down for a couple of years and pump out a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

Check out my new column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

bitch_slap_posterBitch Slap – Giveaway

When I was at Comic-Con a year and a half ago I can remember this being one of the most memorable interviews I ever conducted. I say conducted as I think conduct was what in order when I was told that the interview I was about to participate in was going to happen in bed.

Sure, you get that sinking feeling when you’re faced with having a conversation with three really lovely women about a movie that is being talked about with the kind of delight the film no doubt was going for. Part pulp, part exploitation, and all fun I don’t believe this movie will require you to do anything more than just enjoy the spoils of their labor.

To that end, and to celebrate the film’s debut today in theaters and on VOD, January 8th.

I’ve got a SIGNED Bitch Slap poster sporting the signatures of  Julia Voth, America Olivo, Erin Cummings, Kevin Sorbo and Zoe Bell, a SIGNED mini-sheet poster (just the girls), one unsigned poster and the full BITCH SLAP 11 card collectible set.

If you’re feeling randy just shoot me a line at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com and I’ll enter you to win one of these prizes. And if you’re still unsure if this movie’s right for you just read the following synopsis:

Bitch Slap is a post-modern, thinking man’s throwback to the “B” Movie/Exploitation films of the 1950’s – 70’s as well as a loving, sly parody of the same.  Inspired by the likes of Dragstrip Girl;, Faster Pussycat, Kill, Kill; Kung Fu Nun and the pantheon of Blaxploitation films, Bitch Slap will mix girls, guns, outrageous action and jaw-dropping visuals with a message”¦ don’t be naughty!

At its core, Bitch Slap follows three bad girls (a down-and-out stripper, a drug-running killer and a corporate powerbroker) as they arrive at a remote desert hideaway to extort and steal $200 Million in diamonds from a ruthless underworld kingpin.  Things quickly spin out of control as allegiances change, truths are revealed, other criminals arrive for the score, the fate of the world hangs in the balance and they are forced to confront a villain much worse than they ever expected”¦ themselves.  It’s the ultimate morality tale as, one by one, they realize the whole she-bang was a set-up and one of them may not even be human…

What also makes Bitch Slap different is a complicated “B” story device that runs throughout the film to illuminate character, backstory and relationship histories not previously revealed.  Like the film Memento, these scene flashbacks take place in reverse, so by the end of the film, you have a wholly different take on who these women are and why they are behaving so badly.  Bet you never saw THAT in Jailbait Babysitter!

So grab your popcorn and fasten your safety belt.  With “Cult Classic” written all over it, Bitch Slap is gonna be one wild ride”¦

Freestyle, IM Global and Epic Slap will premiere BITCH SLAP in theaters and VOD January 8, 2010

YOUTH IN REVOLT / LEAP YEAR – Review

leapOne insult after another with nary a punchline to be found.

What’s astounding about Leap Year, the latest in a long line of painful movies where we are to believe that a woman has mistakenly thought the love of her life is the man she’s with but that it’s not until they meet a strapping, charismatic man before they forsake everything they’ve built in their lives just to be with a stranger they invariably know for a relatively short period of time. It’s an insult to an audience to try and sell an idea that a woman (played by the usually charming Amy Adams) who is willing to fly, on her own accord, to Ireland in order to ask her boyfriend to marry her in a leap year in an act that seems passionate and kind and romantic and incredible yet manages to fall out of love with that man. It defies all rationality to think how a woman could do this yet Anand Tucker tries to sell a comedy that just seems sad, pathetic, and speaks ill of a heroine who just comes off as easily impressionable and just plain, well, easy.

Through a series of situations which exist and play out in farcical fashion, one such moment involves Adams indiscriminately destroying the world’s smallest hotel room and shoehorning a piece of a sub-plot which is there, I assume, to help those who have difficulty with pesky subtly and nuance, we are to trust in this tale of love that wasn’t meant to be yet obviously will.

The logistics that this movie defies is truly astounding and noteworthy. After not being able to find a rental car, in what I can only believe is some remote outpost of humanity but  exists mere hours away from a bustling metropolis of Dublin, Matthew Goode, who plays his one note character as best as one could expect, becomes the de facto transporter although he really, truly, doesn’t want to. The level of stupidity this script shows in its obviousness staggers the mind.

Love abounds, as it usually does, after a series of unbelievable moments that involve a wrecked car, stolen luggage, missed trains, an outdoor wedding reception (I thought this was February in Ireland), a forced kiss that betrays Adams’ purpose in the first place, and through tiny moments of revelation that show just how right these two are for one another when, in fact, it feels like how it would happen in a fairytale. At one point, after Adams seems trapped in a Bermuda Triangle when trying to find some mode of transport that will just get her to Dublin, she buys a ticket for a train that will take her there. She’s had enough of Goode, as is usually the case with a woman who feels she is being weighted down with a fop , and sits on the train’s platform. The train, we’re told, will take more than two hours to get to the station. Goode motions to Adams in taking a walk to the ruins of a castle where he can extemporaneously talk about the mythical history of the runs and, by proxy, explain how this story will end with the two of them together. Won’t take more than fifteen minutes, he says. She relents, goes, listens to the story, and, wouldn’t you know it, the train shows up. Running will do no good here, as would be the logical deduction that we just told the train wouldn’t be there for two plus hours, and there is nary an explanation as to what worm hole that train appeared from or what just happened. Compound this moment a dozen or so times and you’ve got yourself Leap Year.

How can Adams walk around Ireland at the end of February wearing nothing but a dress, high heels and a light overcoat with no problem at all? How can a dog bark without moving its head? Why on earth would she strip nude and shower in front of a stranger? How could she demolish a rented room without once noticing the detritus falling around her and stopping?  Your logic is no good here as you’d be a fool for trying to piece together the broken shards of this film.

Much like Gavin Hood straying from what he seemed to be strongest at, creating emotionally charged and deeply affective films, and instead deciding to craft a prosaic movie about a mutant with metal coming out of his hands, Tucker seems to want this kind of career pathing. This movie suffers from the kind of inane traps that plague bad romantic comedies but it’s ironic in that the movie engenders neither romance nor comedy. Sure, we are given situations where comedy is supposed to flourish, Adams finds herself blowing out a small village’s power supply after trying to plug in her BlackBerry, she accidentally destroys her guide’s car, she muddies herself after tumbling down a muddy mountain, but it’s all very ham fisted even by romantic comedy standards.

Much is made for fires and the one thing you would grab should you find your home engulfed in them. The importance of this is stressed like a mantra that is repeated over and over again in an effort, I am to believe, to make sure you absolutely positively get that this will be important later. At one point Adams’ great epiphany comes when she thinks about pulling the fire alarm in her posh new apartment after we learn that Scott only proposed marriage after finding out that the only way for them to get into the uber exclusive tenement, which required an interview with a committee at the beginning of the film, was to feign being married or at least on the road to it. Scott obviously comes off as the typical bad boyfriend who only cares about materialism, the fire alarm shows how he only wants to save his electronics (Gasp! He must not love her and must only worship false, electronic deities!), and the scene ultimately shows how bad the script written by Deborah Kaplan and Harry Elfont actually is. To wit, the writing team who brought us Made of Honor, Surviving Christmas, Josie and the Pussycats, and The Flintstones in Viva Rock Vegas obviously feel comfortable with keeping expectations low as any movie that wants us to trust in their ability to give audiences something entertaining only end up failing, once again, to think this is anything but a movie for simple-minded bumpkins who don’t realize they’re being insulted.

youthYouth In Revolt, in contrast, only suffers from being too well-written.

Director Miguel Arteta ought to be praised for his ability to bring one of the best novels about adolescent lust gone wretchedly wrong in every way, the visual character he brought to Chuck & Buck and Star Maps is here in its essence, but there is a fundamental issue that hobbles this film from being the teenage classic it could be. It’s the expediency with which events transpire and then expire from the movie that only serves to confuse viewers who aren’t familiar with the life and times of Nick Twisp (Michael Cera) as he pursues the girl of his dreams, Sheeni Saunders (Portia Doubleday), but the story is rife with comedic possibilities and the handling of the things that made the book wonderful only feel rushed here.

Writer Gustin Nash‘s hand feels present in every scene as we go from plot device to plot device, we aren’t allowed to let the story breathe on its own, as if Nash wanted to be sure to include as many bits as he could from the book in order to remain faithful to it. Who could blame him, at almost 500 pages there is an inordinate amount of laughs to be found within the pages as writer C.D. Payne developed this over sexed and overly intelligent protagonist with the flourish of a great storyteller, for wanting to do so but the result is a greatest-hits compilation of scenes that sometimes feel jarring as a viewer.

This isn’t to say the film is bad. Far from it. It’s perhaps one of the frankest explorations of what “good” young men have to do in order to satiate that side of themselves which, here, makes for good comedy. Nick is deftly played by Michael Cera, who is able to carry not only the meek personality which seems to come naturally to the actor but is able to transform into his daring alter ego, François Dillinger, with gentle ease. It’s Dillinger who had the greatest opportunity and latitude to go for the laughs in this movie and he does so with gusto. As he compels Nick to do what he is unwilling to do on his own, Cera morphs from a smart, frustrated boy into the kind of man we have never seen before on camera. You believe Cera is capable of the destruction and perversion he partakes in simply by playing off of himself with charisma and aplomb. From suggestive remarks about violating the body of his girlfriend, to possessing the affectations of an English speaking Frenchman with a pathological bent, the film is a delight when these two share the camera.

As well, Adhir Kalyan, who plays Nick’s friend Vijay Joshi, is a superb compliment to Cera as the two of them feed off one another in the kind of patois this film excels at when it’s not speeding through scenes. Again, we are briefly shown how these two become friends and aren’t really allowed to appreciate how vital Vijay is to what becomes one of the movie’s best set pieces. As an aside, I wish we would see more of Adhir as he’s more than competent to jostle with Cera for laughs on screen. However, a lot of the issues regarding this movie’s quick pace, however, stem from this movie’s first act.

Adapting the novel seemed too much for Nash as what we get in the first third of this movie is a lot of rushing. We move from one moment to the next, inserting pithy scenes from the book to fit the moment, without ever delving into the characters of the book or the implication of what it means in the grand scheme of things. It not only implicitly casts a pall on a book that is packed with pure comedy but, explicitly, it has the effect of cheapening this movie’s intent which is to show how one pervy boy with a pathological streak manipulates those around him. To wit, Zach Galifianakis plays one of Nick’s mom’s boyfriends. He is introduced, used for a few scenes, and is crumpled up just as quickly as he came on the screen like a piece of detritus that needs to be swept away in order to make room for other characters. This is the case for the rest of the movie, characters coming and going in order to introduce everyone in this book’s universe, along with their strange proclivities. Zach feels there almost in a utilitarian capacity as he’s the driving force to get Nick out of town so he can meet Sheeni, he’s the one who buys the camper that ultimately meets a fiery finish, and he conveniently meets his demise just at the right time in order to progress the journey. There’s nothing wrong with making every moment contribute to the whole, and for there to be reasons why something is in a movie, but the end result is mass confusion as these contrivances just make everything feel too convenient, too pat.

The issue that this movie never deals with, then, is why Nick and Sheeni are willing to go back and forth with this relationship. We know Nick’s reason for sure but it doesn’t ever feel genuine and it certainly doesn’t earn its ending which feels rushed and shoehorned in as if someone happened to look at their watch to see that the movie was about to break 90 minutes. We ought to feel the penultimate moment these two kids share is well-deserved but the way in which they finally consummate their relationship just doesn’t work.

It’s sad that the relationship that could have spoken to so many pent-up and sexually frustrated boys everywhere is relegated to the backseat of a movie that seems determined to drive the shortest route between two points instead of taking the longer, more scenic route. The result is a movie that certainly could have detailed the life of this young man on the road to finally getting some but it’s a journey that speeds by too fast to appreciate how we got there.

Zachary Levi of Chuck – Interview

I’m used to interviewing celebrities one time. Many of the times they’re enjoyable, sometimes they’re fantastic, and some other times are completely awful. It’s the latter ones where I secretly wish their career commits seppuku just to ensure I never even remotely have the chance to talk to them again.

Zachary Levi is a special case in that I have talked to him a handful of times and every time, absolutely every time, he’s just a kind, open, honest, naturally funny guy who doesn’t put up a superficial front and genuinely thinks about answers before he gives them. He also likes to talk. A lot. That’s really fine for me as when we had a chance to spend a long conversation talking about Chuck’s near demise and the future of network television in general last summer at Comic-Con there was a sense of calm with the actor about all the hullabaloo surrounding the show’s direction. He was passionate when talking about the effort a lot of fans put into making the public aware of the precarious position the show found itself in as it closed out it’s second season. So passionate was Levi about rolling up his shirt sleeves to save the show, Levi literally rolled up his shirt sleeves. Making sandwiches at Subway, coinciding with the series finale, it was a clever sponsorship drive that asked fans to purchase subs, writing a comment or two about how much they wanted the show to stay on the air, Levi didn’t let this oft abused rallying cry on the Internet to save yet another show go unnoticed.

It was this kind of effort, small as it may have been, that speaks volumes about the man who goes into work and gets to play a secret agent on TV every week.There is no affectation when he speaks, it’s just a guy talking about a career who’s just thankful to have one. It doesn’t seem like a lot but it’s conversations like this that remind me how much better interviews could be if people were just more, well, human.

Chuck is indeed back for its third season starting this Sunday night with a two-hour season premiere at 9/8c before returning to its regular night and time, January 11th at 8/7c.

chuckCS:  One of the things that marked this year, this season, for Chuck was the number of people who came out wanting to be sure the show was saved from the network chopping block.  What was your take on how that swell started?  I know a lot of people in your position would say “There’s nothing we can do about it” but what was it like to have all those people come out and say, “Please save the show?”

LEVI: It certainly gives you an appreciation of what you do.  Being a working actor and getting to do what I love to do is already awesome.    For the most part, no matter what you do somebody out there likes it and somebody out there will find you at some point and say “Hey, I love your work” even if it’s a horrible piece of crap, which is sometimes the case…

(Laughs)

But, with this I think we’ve collectively all been pretty proud of what we’ve accomplished ““ what we continue to accomplish.  So on top of just that and appreciating it that way and knowing that your fan base, your core demographic fan base which is ““ we live and die by Comic-Con ““ because Chuck would be here.  Chuck would be at the Chuck panel ““ which would be a very out of body experience.  Wait a minute?  That’s me!

CS:  There are hotel keys with your face on it”¦

LEVI:  I know man.  That has been that way for three years now.  Warner Bros. has done a great job at doing that.  All those little things certainly help.  I remember when Jerico was about to get canceled the first time and all the fans went crazy and they worked in unison and sent tons of peanuts to CBS and it worked.  It got 13 more episodes for Jerico.  But I feel like what’s happened is kind of like ““ and I’ve never seen it happen like this before ““ where a fan really had a kind of moment of genius – when some people sent Nerds, those little candy Nerds, to NBC which is all effective in some way because they are passionate fans, but at the end of the day it doesn’t change the problem.  It doesn’t solve the problem.

The problem is television is failing.

The formula doesn’t work anymore.  Back in the day you had 3 options.  CBS, NBC, and ABC and there was no cable, no DVR’s, no Internet, so if you were going to be home, which a lot of people were on any given night, Nielsen’s worked.  You could see a cross section there. 70% of the audience is going to be watching the Cheers finale and they have to watch the commercials through and in that way you could offer free entertainment like that.  You could force commercials down people’s throats but you can’t do that anymore.  So more and more people, especially audiences of a show like Chuck that are tech savy, are watching it online.  They are watching it on DVR and so, as much as I think they like to think that that still counts. It actually doesn’t. Even networks and studios say “Well, every little bit helps” but they know it doesn’t really work out that way.  Because, at the end of the day, advertisers are only looking at the live numbers.  They need to know if we spend this amount of money on advertising, who’s actually seeing those commercials.  And live numbers are the only ones that count.  Really.

So, it makes it very difficult.  The roundabout way of getting to our very dedicated fans, Wendy Farrington, a smart cool chick, she was watching the show one night and worried about the show getting canceled because that was the word on the street that it was on the chopping block. And she saw one of the scenes where Big Mike is chopping away on a Subway sandwich and thought, “If we can get enough fans to actually patronize one of the main sponsors, actually spending money that directly connects to, it’s not just wasting your money on peanuts or Nerds and making some statement.  “So what if we’re not watching the commercials.  We know who is behind the show and we will spend money and buy their product?”  So she came up with this idea, wrote it up, came up with a mission statement and that got picked up virally basically by everybody.  Some of my fan sites asked for my take on it and I told them what I’m telling you, that I think it’s a fantastic idea.  It’s a real idea and not just people swarming their fists around saying, “No, no, please don’t.”  We get it.

zachary-levi-meb2009The rubber has got to meet the road somewhere.  And so that, mixed with a couple other variables, allowed us to come back for a 3rd season.  I think it’s really kind of blazed a trail and I think if network television is going to survive in this new DVR, internet, downloadable world, why not like that?  Why not just have one main sponsor and harken back to what TV used to be?  How about Borax? I don’t know.  But as long as it’s an easily consumable product. Unfortunately for car makers, you can’t be a Toyota and hope that people will go buy a Civic, or a Celica, I mean.  All of that combined to create a perfect storm of this is really happening.  It was weird because at first your pride takes a hold a little bit.  You think, “Why aren’t we picked up?  We are a good show and critics like us, a lot of critics love us, our fans love us, and yes, we only do 7 million live but there’s a number 5 if you count all the DVRs and download and DVD purchases.  That’s a lot of people.  Right?”

So, at first I was a little bummed.  I thought it just sucked that this show gets picked up right away and this show is back and we’re still waiting and hanging on but as we went through this whole process what I realized is A) it gave me an appreciation for what we do, like I was saying because it’s humbling especially today.  Being out there in front of a packed hall of 4,000 fans that are dedicated to the show and that’s just a sampling because there are people that stood in line but couldn’t make it into the room and what we do impacts them in some way enough for them to be there with us today and it’s really, really, really humbling and to be here at Comic-Con because we live and die by these very fans that joined the cause and picked up the torch or whatever analogy or metaphor ““ it’s only right that whatever time we can spend with them to say, “Thank you.  I only have a job today because you guys cared enough to Tweet about it or blog about it or emailed it to other friends.”

We also have fans that just bug the heck out of their families and friends ““ check out Chuck ““ did you see Chuck? ““ Chuck, Chuck, Chuck, you know?

(Laughs)

LEVI: I was telling a reporter and the lady from the Chicago Tribune ““ and people like yourself ““ anyone in the media who through all that and before we went on the chopping block, during the season we’ve gotten a lot of love and I’m sure their viewers were saying, “OK, enough of this freakin’ Chuck ““ I get it, you like the show, OK.”  But they are constantly plugging the show and constantly giving us love.  So I really feel that, not that we are the first to stick around because of that kind of love ““ Arrested Development stuck around because of critical acclaim and a dedicated fan base, and winning a couple of trophies didn’t hurt – but even despite that it wasn’t enough for Fox to keep them around, so three seasons and then it was done.  And there are people that still today say, “How could they possible do that?  It was the best show on television.”  And it was.  It was an incredible show but it was ahead of it’s time I think.  And being ahead of your time isn’t always the best thing because audiences still hadn’t caught on to the single camera comedy in that way.  Scrubs has stayed around and weathered some storms and now it’s going to keep going and I’m sure there are fans that are really happy about that.  Then also, so through the process I went from being like that really sucks that we weren’t renewed to seeing all the outcry and outpouring of the love of our fan base and the critics because everybody picked it up: Entertainment Weekly, and E, and TV Guide, and People.  The show that might go away”¦it’s Chuck.  And then I realized that we are getting lots of free press out of this.  This is really good.  And then you start to think about it in the bigger scheme of things like stuff that only later on in hindsight ““ you think clearly God had a bigger plan than all this because now this is keeping us fresh in people’s minds because we are not going to be on the air again until March 1st possibly and that’s all I know.

CS:  That’s like another writers strike.

LEVI: Yes.  Fortunately it won’t be that long until we go back to work but nonetheless, that’s a long time off the air.  We certainly benefited tremendously from not being quietly renewed in the night.  We fought for it.  Our fans fought for it.  Our critical fans fought for it and we’re back.  And, I feel like because of that, now it’s almost like our fans are part owners of the show.  They are all shareholders.  “Yeah, we fought for that and we got that back.”  It wasn’t just because the numbers were so great that 15 million people are watching it and of course you are going to get renewed.  No man, it was the strong, the proud, the Marines”¦

(Laughs)

LEVI: And nerds everywhere.  When I was in the UK right before the finale I was in Birmingham ““ Adam Baldwin and I were at a Comi-Con out there and doing some signings and stuff and it was right before the finale and my publicist was calling me saying that a lot of people are asking, both editorial and fan sites, asking what we are going to do for the finale.  “Are you going to do a footlong finale thing with the grassroots thing?” and the girl who started the thing was in the UK and I met her there for the first time.  I think she was from Philadelphia and there happened to be a Subway there.  I didn’t even know they had them there because it’s called the Underground there.

(Laughs)

January 5, 2010

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Paul & Storm

Filed under: A Bit Of A Chat With Ken Plume,Interviews — Tags: , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 4:00 am

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I chat with musical comedy duo Paul & Storm

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Paul & Storm“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-paul_and_storm.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

December 28, 2009

Party Favors: French Fried

Filed under: Interviews,Joe Corey's Party Favors — Tags: , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 4:07 am

partyfavors1.jpg

PARIS – When you want to escape to the Riviera without spending the vacation time, you can always catch a foreign film that captures the sea, sun and fun. The Girl From Monaco transports us to the principality nestled along the French coastline.

Fabrice Luchini plays a Parisian lawyer who heads to the coast to defend a client accused of killing a Russian mobster. He gets distracted from the courthouse drama by a local weather girl (Louise Bourgoin). Can he get his mind back on the homicide? Or has he gone on vacation?

The film is now out on DVD from Magnolia Home Entertainment. Director Anne Fontaine was willing to answer a few questions via email. Fontaine had been an actress in French cinema during the ’80s before stepping behind the camera as a writer-director. She also recently wrote and directed critically praised Coco Before Chanel.

Party Favors: What was it like to direct Fabrice Luchini? Where there any references you used for him to understand the mindset of his character?

Fontaine: I’ve known Fabrice Luchini for 25 years or so. We’ve been close friends all that time, and also worked together: I helped him to stage a monologue performance based on Louis-Ferdinand Céline. We toured the show here and there, including Monaco… The character of Betrand shares a number of traits with real-life Fabrice. So he had no problem understanding the part. His issues had more to do with the fear of exposing too much of himself. He was concerned with self-caricature, or self-indulgence.

Party Favors: What made you realize that Louise Bourgoin was the right temptress for the part?

Fontaine: I met with dozens of actresses, most of them more experienced than Louise… She combines several qualities, that are usually not going together: she is beautiful yet funny, sexy yet chic, versatile yet recognizable… It’s her ability to feature such diversity that makes her attractive.

Party Favors: Is her style in forecasting the weather popular in the region?

Fontaine: No, that’s completely fictitious. And, unlike in the US, France has no local TV stations worth the name.

Party Favors: What did you do to make sure the film didn’t become a sex farce?

Fontaine: I tried and led the actors to understand, support and care for their characters. I believe that when a relationship is genuine and “caring” between the actor and the part, the risk of being superficial (or “farcical”) is greatly reduced.

Party Favors: What made you want to keep the score minimal?

Fontaine: I don’t think it’s that minimal ( 20 minutes or so), but it’s restricted to the last third of the film. I wanted it to signal a change of tone, and a new shade in the story, as in “we’ve been mostly light and carefree until now, but there’s trouble ahead…”.

Party Favors: Is there a term for people who arrive on the Mediterranean coast and forget themselves like “going native”?

Fontaine: Not that I know of… the other way round (people from the provinces “going Parisian”) is more frequent, actually!

Party Favors: Do you ever look at a promotional still of yourself on the set with the actors and ponder if you should have cast yourself in a role?

Fontaine: I’ve been an actress a long time ago. Neither very successful, nor very good…And today, I feel much too busy on the set to think of myself in any other capacity. I’ve done a couple of cameos, not that long ago, for other directors. That’s fine. But I wouldn’t be comfortable casting myself!

Party Favors: How long did you scout locations?

Fontaine: The scouting proper was not very long ( two weeks, or so). But I’ve been to Monaco (which is tiny, anyway) a number of times, so I knew the area quite well.

Party Favors: Is it more expensive to shoot in Monaco versus Paris?

Fontaine: By and large, it’s comparable to the posh areas in Paris.

Party Favors: What did you learn from making “The Girl from Monaco” that you used in Coco Before Chanel?

Fontaine: Hard to tell specifically… I would only say that, in my opinion, unlearning is as crucial as learning.

Party Favors: Do French women actually not care if their husbands have mistresses or is that a myth spread by American husbands wanting to use your culture as a “good example” of why their wives shouldn’t attack them with golf clubs?

Fontaine: I’m not sure general rules really apply to these matters.

MICK IS STONED AGAIN?

With Ron Wood completely falling apart, seems the Rolling Stones are ready to cut him loose. Who could replace him without the Stones being reduced to a trio with backing musicians making another obvious cash grab tour?

Our dubious connection that watched an episode of Knights of Prosperity says Mick Taylor is coming back after splitting 35 years ago.

The Stones have had their spies lurking at Taylor’s club gigs scouting to see if he could be cleaned up and physically handle a World stadium tour. They understand the buzz of this reunion could help make this more than the usual “see the Stones before they finally retire” buzz.

The Mick Taylor era is when the Stones earned their title as the greatest live band ever. The man brought the voodoo chords to “Brown Sugar” and “Midnight Rambler.” Just dig up the King Biscuit Flower Hour recordings of their ’73 European tour and feel the power.

The ultimate plan for the tour is to have Bill Wyman rejoin them for a massive Wembley Stadium special. It’s a ’69 Stones reunion. One unnamed promoter declared that the TV rights would net as much as a Mike Tyson title fight.

Nothing is solid, but with the amount of cash and attention that could be gained from such a move, Jagger and Richards aren’t in their usual “we don’t want to look back” attitude. This will also patch up their public black eye from the recent articles about how the Stones screwed Mick Taylor out of his royalties.

The back up player if Mick Taylor can’t handle it: Eric Clapton. They don’t want to have to pay out Clapton cash. After Clapton the rumored guitarist will be a recent graduate of the School of Rock as part of an internship deal.

MORE AWARDS

Bob Crane Father of the Year Award goes to Tiger Woods. For months it seemed like Jon Gosselin had locked this title up. But in a historic post-Thanksgiving run, the golfing great came out of nowhere to inhale all the bad will generated by Jon upon his dumping a wife and 8 kids for a slew of skanks. On a fateful night Tiger went from the most boring superstar this side of Roger Federer to a meltdown masterpiece worthy of John Daly emotional trainwrecks. Turns out the father of two and husband of a hot Swedish wife was messing around with party girls, porn stars and a Perkins waitress. And loving it bareback with most of them. The best “denial” came from a porn star who claimed she wasn’t one of his mistresses since they’d only screwed during Tiger’s bachelor party. I bet there was rejoicing at this good news at Tiger’s house. For flaunting his family while banging a cellphone full of skanks, Tiger Woods is a Bob Crane kinda guy.

Break Thru Actress is Eva Amurri. After years of toiling in minor roles, she took over the camera on this season of Californication as the college student by day and stripper by night. Sure she was fourth on Hank Moody’s totem pole of lovers, but she had the most upward possibilities. Her ability to turn up the sass and tease should lead to her playing a few amazing ex-wives in her career.

Comeback Kid also goes to a Californication guest star: Rick Springfield. There are a lot of fans of “Jesse’s Girl” that had their eyes burned by seeing Rick in a devil’s three-way with Evan Handler. And it wasn’t any simple sex scene – Rick is pouring wax on her back while singing his hits.

Nice Vagina Award goes to Billy Bush. I’m disgusted at Billy Bush being disgusted at everything he reports on his show. If you don’t like the filth, get out of the sty and let another news piggy wallow in the “truth.”

Olympian to Watch: Katie Uhlaender has me skeleton crazy for the 2010 games. Why isn’t there a couples skeleton? The most exciting time you can have with a partner lying on top of you that doesn’t involve sponsorship from Trojan Condoms or Zippy Lube.

MY TLC SHOW

BLU-RAY HEAVEN

10 Things I Hate About You: 10th Anniversary Edition reminds us that Heath Ledger was always a cinematic stud. The film is a high school version of The Taming of the Shrew that holds up a decade later. Joseph Gordon-Levitt ((500) Days of Summer) wants to hook up with Larisa Oleynik. The problem is she can’t date until her sister (Julia Stiles) also has a boyfriend. She’s not as sweets as her sister thus it looks like this day will never come. A solution comes in the shape of bad boy Heath Ledger being hired to woo Stiles. Can she resist his Aussie charms? The trio of Ledger, Stiles and Gordon-Levitt elevates this film above the average Shakespeare adaptation. The Blu-ray image brings out the elements that made Ledger a star. He did glow. The bonus features include deleted scenes and a fresh documentary that includes Ledger’s screen test. This is much more engrossing than your dull English teacher walking you through the text.

All About Steve brings us back to Sandra Bullock’s creative focus on playing ugly characters that transform. In this case she’s emotionally ugly as a stalker. And not just any type of stalker, but one that is obsessed with a local TV news cameraman played by Bradley Cooper (The Hangover). Thomas Haden Church (Wings) is the reporter that isn’t getting Sandra’s groupie love. How can this be? The film is more goofy than witty. This isn’t a great comic follow up to The Hangover for Cooper. But it’s a dopey lazy Sunday afternoon Blu-ray for when Tiger Woods wants to unwind with his latest Las Vegas conquest. The high definition transfer makes me wonder how many man can resist Sandra no matter how insane she might be. The audio commentary includes all of the stars. A gag reel, deleted scenes and other bonus features are secondary to Cooper and Ken Jeong’s duet. These two ought to get their own lounge act in Vegas. There’s also a digital copy of the film so you can watch stalker Sandra while waiting in the airport.

DVD SHELF

The Clint Eastwood Collection gives us the four films that made Clint a cinematic cowboy icon. A Fistful of Dollars was his first spaghetti western with Sergio Leone in the director’s chair. The film remakes Yojimbo with Clint playing two rival gangsters for fools. This wasn’t like the usual horse opera. Eastwood drops his persona from Rawhide to become an amazing bad ass under the hat. For A Few Dollars More is a second dose of Sergio and Clint. He’s now a bounty hunter teaming up with Lee Van Cleef to go after a big time outlaw. Klaus Kinski is one of the baddies. The Good, The Bad and The Ugly is an epic of the spaghetti western genre. Clint’s The Good, Lee is The Bad and Eli Wallach is The Ugly. The DVD in this collection is the 179 minute cut from the 2005 special edition. Hang ‘Em High was Clint bringing his Italian cowboy action back to Hollywood. He’s a survivor of a lynching who wants to bring them to rope justice. Director Ted Post did the Saturday morning cult fave Ark II. Clint’s Sergio Leone trilogy and first major Hollywood is an essential part of any DVD collection.

The Mickey Rourke Collection brings us back to the time when Mickey was a good looking guy whose face didn’t resemble a rump roast with eyeballs. The four films have star turns with the man whose career became dominated by boxing and little dogs in his pockets. “Pope of Greenwich Village launched Mickey and Eric Roberts as a dynamic duo. They’re hustlers working angles except one of them loses their thumb. A Prayer for the Dying teams him with Bob Hoskins for an IRA bomber tale. Desperate Hours is a hostage taking film that involves Anthony Hopkins. It was another of Michael Cimino’s comebacks. Harley Davidson & The Marlboro Man is brilliant cheese with Don Johnson as the breaded cowboy biker. Mickey is the leather clad Harley. It’s kinda like a movie that Easy Rider‘s Billy and Captain America would have made if they wanted to remake Cobra. It’s one of the Action Trash Masterpieces during the Planet Hollywood Era. For newcomers eager to see the latest Iron Man villain, The Mickey Rourke Collection is a low budget peak to his origins.

United States of Tara: The First Season brings together the talents of stripper/screenwriter Diablo Cody and theme park maven Steven Spielberg. The Showtime series is about a mother with dissociative identity disorder and a very understanding family. Toni Collette is amazing as she slips between being a drunken trucker, sassy teen and a ’50s TV mom. John Corbett (Northern Exposure is the husband forced to roll with the personality punches. Collette pulls off a difficult role without making it seem like a Jonathan Winters’ multiple personalities sketch. Sadly enough, the show is already dated since it seems to think MySpace is cool. How 2006. The boxset has all 12 episodes on 2 DVDs along with the season 3 first episode of The Tudors. The big bonus is an interview with Diablo Cody.

Disney’s Winnie the Pooh, A Valentine For You: Special Edition bring together three episodes of the cartoon series. This is a fun gift for any little kids you might feel obligating in introducing them to the holiday without it getting mushy. “A Valentine For You” reminds us that a person doesn’t need to be limited by who they can love. You can add others without chucking out the old. This is a good message to little kids who think there’s best friend rationing. “Un-Valentine’s Day” deals with Tigger being over-zealous in giving out heart shaped cards. Remember that you’re best giving out more candy to people you like instead of flooding them with cards. “My Hero” has piglet going airborne with his kite. He saves Tigger from drowning and discovers the burden of being a hero. The bonus game is called “Catch the Love Bug. “You click to catch the bug in a jar. Included in the DVD is 6 little Pooh themed Valentine’s Days cards to give to your special friends.

The New Adventures of Mighty Mouse: The Complete Series is the 1987 revival that had Ralph Bakshi (Cool World) and John Kricfalusi (Ren and Stimpy) in control of the rodent hero. While the series was intended for little kids on Saturday mornings, the humor leans a bit toward the attitude that now dominates Adult Swim. The 19 episodes poke fun at things like Rocky and Bullwinkle. When this originally aired, uptight parent groups swore there was a cocaine joke in the series. They include three original cartoons: “He Dood It Again,” “Gypsy Lifeand “Mysterious Package.” The best bonus feature is a 30 minute documentary about the show featuring all the key players discussing the revival. This is the perfect DVD set to blow a few gift cards on.

Becker: The Third Season gives us another 24 visits with America’s crankiest doctor. John Becker (Ted Danson) doesn’t cure with kindness. He gets extra testy in “Smoke ’em If You Got ‘Em.” He attempts to quit smoking and the charm level dips. “Dr. Angry Head” is the Christmas special that involves Becker screwing up his back at a department store. “The Princess Cruise” has him booked on a gay cruise. Because it is ordered by the FCC, Brian Posehn appears in “The Ugly Truth.” Star Trek fans will get their ears in a point on “The TorMentor.” Turns out Becker’s favorite professor at Harvard was Leonard Nimoy. “Small Wonder” gives us Regis Philbin as a homeless man. This was his nightmare when Kathie Lee split. The season finale “Trials and Defibrillations” has Marvin Kaplan, the voice of Choo Choo from Top Cat. He can handle Becker after 8 seasons of Vic Tayback’s food on Alice.

Kendra: The Complete First Season explores the union between Hugh Hefner’s ex-girlfriend and NFL receiver Eric Baskett. The couple’s beginnings are a bit hazy since they met well she was still one of Hef’s “active” girlfriends as seen on The Girls Next Door. But after she left the mansion, they made their love public. Even though she was considered the wildest of the three girls, she quickly became a one woman guy with Hank. The episodes here go from their engagement on the Space Needle to their wedding at the Playboy Mansion. There’s also a secret surprise as the bridal shower becomes a baby shower. Can a relationship survive being constantly filmed? And how long can Hank handle the flaming Jonny Makeup? He’s like the rollerskating guy on Reno 911. The show is educational when it comes to a party girl’s lessons in becoming semi-domestic.

Trailer Park: Dave Foley of THE STRIP

By Christopher Stipp

The Archives, Right Here

I was able to sit down for a couple of years and pump out a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

Check out my new column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

sita-sings-the-blues-dvdSita Sings the Blues – Quick Review

Sooooo….this is awkward.

I want to start off by making clear my stance on this DVD is that you should buy it. Go right out and purchase it any which way you can.

My second point is that not only is this a movie the venerable Roger Ebert reviewed glowingly on his blog a year ago but you can go on the film’s website and watch it for free.

Like Roger, I didn’t really have a strong passion to sit down with this film and consume it immediately. I got to it when it got to it as I didn’t really know what this movie was about, I was intrigued by the idea that this an animated film in the 2D vein, and wasn’t at all familiar with the filmmaker, Nina Paley. As Paley states, this film “is a musical, animated personal interpretation of the Indian epic the Ramayana” which focuses on, “the relationship between Sita and Rama, who are gods incarnated as human beings, and even they can’t make their marriage work.” Avatar this isn’t but this movie is brilliant. Utterly brilliant.

With a humorous and fascinating tone, the movie lays out the mythology of a Hindu epic that millions of people know but might not make sense to us Westerners who might not be familiar with the faith of people who live half way across the globe. The brilliance is not only the animation which just pops and makes you believe that Pixar does not have a corner on the market of evocative storytelling through this medium but Paley embeds her own personal story on top of this larger one.

Paley inserts herself into this film as she draws comparisons to these gods who become man and wife, their marriage unable to be one that’s stable or cohesive. Her own marriage, in the real world, crumbles and she uses this movie as a way to work through her own issues. As well, we have a couple of irreverent narrators who help school us on the whole mythological business in a way that is downright hilarious and poignant, almost like being taught by two professors who can’t seem to agree on anything but possess a deep knowledge of the very subject we’re here to learn about,  and the end result is a movie that defies any kind of linear explanation but it is that very defiance that makes this a movie that I would positively put into my top 5 animated films of 2009. It’s a must see and I cannot express enough the notion you should at least watch a little bit online and, if so moved, purchase the DVD. You cannot go wrong.

Product Description:

NEW YORK, NY ““ When filmmaker Nina Paley couldn’t make her marriage work, she decided to use it as fodder for an ambitious project: a musical, animated and personal interpretation of the Indian epic, the Ramayana.  The highly acclaimed, award-winning result, SITA SINGS THE BLUES, tells two parallel stories: the ancient Hindu story of a god and goddess and Paley’s 21st century break-up, stunningly woven together utilizing flash animation, original watercolor paintings, rotoscoping techniques and imaginative musical interludes which link the narratives 3000 years apart.

In SITA SINGS THE BLUES, the Hindu goddess (and namesake of the film) is the leading lady of the Ramayana, a dutiful wife who follows her husband, Rama, on a 14 year exile, only to be kidnapped by an evil king from Sri Lanka .  Despite remaining faithful to her husband, Sita is forced to endure many trying tests.  Fast forward to modern times, where artist Nina (the filmmaker herself) discovers parallels in Sita’s life when her husband — in India on a work project — decides to break up their marriage and dump her via email.  With narration and hilarious commentary by a trio of Indonesian shadow puppets, both the ancient tragedy and modern comedy are married in this beautifully animated interpretation of the epic, which is also enlivened by grand musical numbers choreographed to a cross-cultural and eclectic mix of 1920’s jazz vocals from Annette Hanshaw and Indian fusion.

In SITA ““ Paley’s first feature length film and one amazingly created entirely from her home studio, using standard-issue computers and over-the-counter software — multiple narrative and visual styles (such as Mughal paintings and temple sculptures to comic books) have been juxtaposed to create a highly entertaining, yet moving, vision of the Ramayana which comes to lavish life with a cast of hundreds: flying monkeys, evil monsters, gods, goddesses, warriors, sages, and winged eyeballs.  Universally acclaimed and winner of over 30 awards from festivals the world over ““ including the prestigious Silver Bear from Berlin and the “Best Film Not Playing at a Theater Near You” Award at the Gotham Awards, SITA SINGS THE BLUES was also invited into the American Film Institute’s prestigious program, AFI PROJECT 20/20, designed to enhance cultural exchange and understanding, by bringing together filmmakers and their films from the US and abroad.

Whether encountering the Ramayana for the first time or revisiting a familiar cultural icon, home audiences will be fascinated, enthralled, entertained and moved by SITA, a tale of truth, justice and a woman’s cry for equal treatment that deftly earns its tagline as “The Greatest Break-Up Story Ever Told.”

DVD Extras: Director’s commentary and interview, the bonus Paley short film “Fetch!” and more

INGLORIOUS BASTERDS – Giveaway

inglourious-basterds-movie-poster-11With no hesitation or hyperbole I can state that Inglorious Basterds was in my top 5 films of 2009. This movie could have been released on DVD without so much as any promotion as it certainly doesn’t need my help in saying how utterly brilliant it was.

Christoph Waltz deserves much of the acting kudos this film receives, not that everyone else really brought their A game to a film that Quentin Tarantino obviously had a fun time creating, but the production values and script are brought together in a maelstrom of what could be said is 2009’s answer to what could be called Best Picture. My fluffery aside, I do have a few more copies of the movie to give away along with some metallic Basterds branded shot glasses and faux blood spattered baseball pens (which you can see here: http://twitpic.com/to9i9). I’ve got tons of these tchotchkes to give out so shoot me a line at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com and let me know if you want to be entered to win.

Now, unless you’ve been living under a rock or have an aversion to movie theaters and pop culture here is the film’s description to see if you want to enter this contest:

Inglourious Basterds begins in German-occupied France, where Shosanna Dreyfus (Mélanie Laurent) witnesses the execution of her family at the hand of Nazi Colonel Hans Landa (Christoph Waltz). Shosanna narrowly escapes and flees to Paris, where she forges a new identity as the owner and operator of a cinema.

Elsewhere in Europe, Lieutenant Aldo Raine (Brad Pitt) organizes a group of Jewish soldiers to engage in targeted acts of retribution. Known to their enemy as “The Basterds,” Raine’s squad joins German actress and undercover agent Bridget Von Hammersmark (Diane Kruger) on a mission to take down the leaders of The Third Reich. Fates converge under a cinema marquee, where Shosanna is poised to carry out a revenge plan of her own…

Criss Angel:  Mindfreak -Collectors Edition

mind1Ok, I am not going to posture and say that Angel is my favorite magician of all time.

In fact, I don’t have a favorite magician of all time and I realize that they themselves don’t want to be called magicians but that’s neither here nor there as I barely know who Criss Angel is. Besides the blown out hair, the chunky jewelry, the guyliner, and the Jersey sensibility to not want to don a shirt (seriously, what is in the water on the east coast that makes clothing such as a shirt repellent to these cats?) the guy is good. In fact, he’s one of the best up close-and-personal illusionists I’ve ever sat down and watched and, without question, this show sparks all kinds of curiosity out of my kids. They we’re glued to what Criss does on the camera, and as we plowed through well over a dozen discs in this set, they were just as fascinated with the first one as they were with the last one.

Tricks, sleight of hand, and visual oddities abound in this show that does make you scratch your head to think about how he is able to be in things that blow up, how he can pass through glass. There is obviously a very logical explanation to all of this but Criss, love him or hate him, makes it a great show to simply watch to be amazed. Much like Christopher Nolan’s The Prestige the trick is not so much the trick itself but the way in which it happens. Criss’ skill is how he covers up any way to figure out what he’s doing or how he’s doing it and, God love him, kept me guessing through every damn frustrating episode where I couldn’t figure it all out.

This set collects every episode that he’s done and should absolutely be seen as a present to yourself if you’re a fan of the series or, if you have the scratch, get it for that special someone in your life. While the seasons seem predicated on topping the one that came before it, you can see the level of spectacle get bigger and more engaging as the time wears on. Obviously, going from Season 1 to the present is the way to go here there is still the interesting activity of watching Criss evolve as an entertainer. That said, the one real grand extra that I found most delightful is the Inside the Mind of Criss Angel which is just a great documentary on the man himself which provides one of the better insights into the guy a lot of people know only from tabloid reports.

A product description:

The #1 Mystifier of all time presents the definitive 15-DVD Collector’s Edition set of the A&E hit series CRISS ANGEL MINDFREAK. Criss Angel’s unique art form pushes creative, physical and mental boundaries, earning him the reputation as one of the most innovative artists of his day and the Houdini of the 21st Century. Each mind-boggling episode in this 15-DVD set captures the creative master at work as he prepares for some of the most mind-blowing illusions, death defying escapes and astonishing physical feats ever attempted.

Whether he’s floating above the Luxor, escaping from a speeding truck filled with explosives, levitating ordinary people through their TV sets, walking on water or hanging by fish hooks through his flesh from a helicopter 1,000 feet above ground, Criss blurs the line between reality and illusion like no other artist in the world.

This astounding collection includes every breathtaking episode from Seasons 1-5, the Halloween Special and a bonus disc featuring 6 episodes never-before-released on DVD – all packaged in a stunning collectible gift case.

* Features all every episode from CRISS ANGEL: MINDFREAK® in collectable pop-up packaging.
* 15 DVD – Includes five episodes never before release on DVD, plus the Halloween special

Bonus features include: Six New-to-DVD Episodes; Episode Commentaries With Criss Angel; Interactive Illusions Through Your Television Screen; “Inside the Mind of Criss Angel” Interview; Criss Angel’s Step-by-Step Guide to Creating Your Own Illusions; Featurettes “Teach a Trick,” “Interviews,” “Practical Jokes,” “Criss Angel Special Gifts,” “Criss Uncensored,” “Criss’ Celebrity Guests”; Behind-the-Scenes Footage; Additional Scenes; Two “Best-Of” Episodes: “Uncut” and “Up Close”; Photo Gallery; Text Biography

Get Your MINDFREAK On!

American Pie Presents: The Book of Love – Giveaway

bookSo, I don’t know much about this film and won’t purport to know different so whether it’s a decent direct to DVD film or if it’s another tired entry into this series. But, I do know Eugene Levy is back again so that has to count for something, right?

I am giving away five (5) copies of the movie on DVD and all you have to do is shoot me a note at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com and let me know if you want to be entered into the contest to win one.

Film Description:

When three East Great Falls High buddies accidentally discover the legendary “Book of Love”, penned by some of their school’s alumni, they embark on a hilariously outrageous quest to lose their virginity with the girls of their dreams. Join Jim’s Dad (Eugene Levy) and this lovable and outrageous group of guys in this raucous comedy full of shocking and heartwarming fun!

“Utterly hilarious and outrageous!””“ Buzz McClain, Playboy.com

Dave Foley – Interview – Part 1

I have to give Kids in the Hall every bit of credit for pouring the foundation of my funny bone.

Thanks to its irreverence and wicked sensibility I found the bar for what’s possible with sketch comedy and filmed bits raised to heights that many who have come after them simply cannot match. While The Kids had an advantage of not having to be on every week like Saturday Night Live it still trumps a vast majority of what passes for funny nowadays.

While the show drove me to learn how navigate Internet newsgroups in the early 90’s just so I could geek out with like-minded nerds on a daily basis I can say that the show still holds a special place in the pantheon of great shows as judged by me. Dave Foley went on to become one of the most successful Kids when he landed on Newsradio shortly after Kids in the Hall stopped as he would stay there for the next five seasons, earning him critical kudos for his turn as Dave Nelson. A markedly different Foley, compared to the roles he performed with The Kids, allowed those around him to become stars in their own right as he once again rode the wave of success all the way through that series, films, and opportunities that have ballasted him all the way though the 90’s and into the aughts.

Dave Foley now stars in The Strip, a comedy in which Foley finds himself in the center of an ensemble of a cast of characters who all share some kind of disdain for having to work in a miserable, low-end electronics store. The movie has some laughs and is worth checking out if you can catch it in a theater near you. Dave is also going to be in The Kids in the Hall: Death Comes to Town that debuts in January on the CBC and represents the first time all the Kids are back on the air since the show went away almost a decade and a half ago. We chat about The Strip, Death, and what it’s like to be the elder statesman on the set of a indie comedy.

dave1CHRISTOPHER STIPP:  Dave?

DAVE FOLEY: Yeah.  You sound surprised.

CS:  No, I  was just waiting.  I’m totally bubbling with anticipation.

FOLEY: Well, I hope not to disappoint.

CS:  I don’t think you can.  I tried to figure out how many ways I could say ““ I’m a huge fan and I’ve been following you now for now what’s going over two decades.

FOLEY: Well, that’s a fine way to say it.

(Laughs)

CS:  I don’t know if I should say your eminence, your holiness”¦

FOLEY:  Any of those is a somewhat an understatement but perfectly acceptable.

(Laughs)

CS:  I saw the movie a couple days ago and I’m a big fan of the film.  I think I was expecting something like a mad, sort of a Keystone cops sort of movie. One where I think a lot of people have grown accustomed to nowadays”¦

FOLEY: You mean where a girls pants get torn off?

(Laughs)

CS:  It’s a quieter film.  It’s a comedy but not a seriously in your face kind of film.

FOLEY: It’s a very low key, character based comedy.  It’s more in a Rushmore vein than in another vein.  More Rushmore than Porkies.  How’s that?

CS:  Yes, I would agree with that.  Did you see that when you read the script?  Leap out at you that it wasn’t what is de rigueur in the world of comedy nowadays?

FOLEY:  I like that it’s really a character study, you know?  All the comedy comes out of these personalities  who all know each other because they share a crappy job together.  So I liked the premise to it.  We don’t wind up dealing with with the mafia or abducted by aliens or anything.

CS:  No vampires?

FOLEY: No vampires at all.  He ends up on a crazy road trip.  All comedy is based in real life which I really like.

CS:  Oddly enough, I was researching those surrounding you in this film and realize that director/writer Jameel Khan ““ this is his first foray into really anything.  Was there any hesitation?  How did you come in contact with a script from a guy who has never done anything?

FOLEY: Well they just got a hold of me through my manager.  Jameel and Jay Khan a hold of my manager and my manager just really liked them.  He called me up and said there are these guys from Chicago and they don’t have a lot of money so it’s going to be very, very low budget.  But then he said they seem like really good people and it’s got a good script.  My manager is a decent guy and I trust his judgment about people so I called them up and they were nice guys.  They sent me the script and it was a really good script and I thought if he can write the script then he can direct it too.  Basically having one conversation with them and after reading the script, I said sure, sign me up.  I’ll be happy to do it.

CS:  It’s amazing to me because you are willing to do things that just don’t seem ““ you’ve had major success with Kids in the Hall, you had major success with Newsradio and you are in the pantheon now of the Disney/Pixar heritage ““ is it hard not to fall into that trap of thinking there are some things you will not do?  You basically are open to possibilities.  Is that hard to do?

FOLEY: No, not for me it doesn’t seem to be.  I don’t think too much in terms of career plan or terms of legacy or anything like that.  If something seems like it will be a fun thing to do and if the people seems like they are going to be interesting to be with, then that is more important to me than the actual product in a lot of ways.  If it seems like it’s going to be a nice experience, because I spend most of my time, for me the movie is about making it.  To see it doesn’t take a lot of time but making it ““ you are going to be with these people for a while and I want to spend it with people I like.  That’s the great part about being an actor.  You get to meet all these people and I like being on a set and if it’s going to be a fun set to be on then I’ll show up.

CS:  That leads to the next question about the other actors around you.  I thought Federico did a fabulous job.  All these actors knew what they needed to do.

FOLEY: Yes.  And they are all not just actors but really talented people.

daveCS:  That’s what’s amazing that these guys, most of the people you were in with, do have long resumes.  They’ve done one shot here, one shot there but they’ve done a lot of productions but like you said, they are not household names but they are good at what they do.

FOLEY: Yeah, and I think they all will become much better known.  Everyone but me in that is pretty young.  Screw them.

CS:  Were you like the elder statesman on set?

FOLEY: Oh yeah.  Oh yeah.  Not sure if it was the elder statesman or the old uncle that has fun with the kids.

CS:  The one they’re not quite sure if he’s pervy or not.

FOLEY: Yeah, “Come on I don’t care if you’re 17, have a beer..”

(Laughs)

CS:  How was that with the other actors?  Obviously, it was Jameel’s first film. Were you leaned on at all?  Did you help add anything suggestion-wise?

FOLEY: They were very open.  It was a very relaxed set and Jameel really knew what he was doing.  He knew what he wanted and knew how he wanted to shoot the movie.  So, he didn’t need any help from me and he had already written a great script.  All I had to do was figure out how I wanted to play it and embellish it here and there, which is what you do when you are performing.  Jameel kept it open and shoot it in a way that we could so we could relax with each other and be very natural with the dialogue.  We could adlib ““ did a lot of cross masters and wide shots – three shots, two shots – which gave us a lot of room to play.  We were playing around within the scenes.  No one felt like we had to reinvent the scene.  We played it the way it was written.

CS:  Did you find that things moved rather quickly?  I only ask because reading in passing that from start to finish it took Jameel about 4 years to get this all together and put out there for everyone to see.  I assume you were brought on late in that game?

FOLEY: I was hired just a couple weeks before we started shooting.  Then we had a very short schedule and so, yea, we shot very quickly.  We didn’t have the luxury of shooting a lot of takes or shooting a lot of coverage so we shot as quickly as we could.  But, I’ve stayed friends with Jameel and Jay

December 23, 2009

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Tom Kenny (Plus A Holiday Surprise!)

Filed under: A Bit Of A Chat With Ken Plume,Holiday Havoc,Interviews — UncaScroogeMcD @ 4:41 am

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I chat with actor and voice artist Tom Kenny, late of MR. SHOW and the voice behind Spongebob Squarepants, about the release of the Spongebob holiday single “Don’t Be A Jerk (It’s Christmas)” and much, much more…

Be it under a rock or deep in a cave upon the highest peak, you must have been living there if the Spongebob Squarepants phenomenon has passed you by. If you’ve been around any child below the age of 15, they can probably tell you exactly who Bikini Bottom’s most famous animated invertebrate is – and, chances are, there are some hip adults that will also clue you in, being fans themselves.

As the voice of the krabby patty flipping squarepants enthusiast, Tom Kenny has brought to life a cultural icon the world over… And he’s a nice guy, to boot. In fact, if you’re not aware of the scads of voice work he’s done over the years (including the mayor and narrator of The Powerpuff Girls), then you probably know him from his on-camera work in the legendary Mr. Show with Bob & David (alongside his equally talented wife Jill Talley).

He also crafted (with Andy Paley) a toe-tapping album starring Spongebob and friends titled The Best Day Ever – a glorious piece of pop informed by his idols, including the likes of The Beach Boys and The Who (in fact, Brian Wilson is a guest artist on the album).

Just in time for the holidays, though, they’ve also released a single – “Don’t Be A Jerk (It’s Christmas)” – which you can snag via iTunes or Amazon.

Not only did I sit down and have a lovely, rambling chat with Tom (which you’ll find below), but he also sent over a special, exclusive LIVE edition of “Don’t Be A Jerk” for all of you to spin this holiday season (You’ll find that below, too). How’s that for holiday cheer?

Hope you enjoy…

spongebob_santa

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Tom Kenny“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-tom_kenny.mp3]

holly.jpg

Download “Don’t Be A Jerk (It’s Christmas) LIVE VERSION“:

[audio:http://asitecalledfred.com/holidayhavoc/spongebob_squarepants-dont_be_a_jerk_its_christmas_live.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

December 22, 2009

Holiday Havoc: An Evening With John Hodgman & Ken Plume II

holidayhavocheader.jpg

holly.jpg

Continuing their annual tradition (HERE is last year’s), we’ve got an in-depth conversation between minor television celebrity, PC, and literary trivialist John Hodgman and Quick Stop’s own Ken Plume. We present this audio feast for the ears, as one titan of culture and one Ken Plume touch on matters historical, Popeye musical, and those involving The Prisoner. Be sure to pick up a copy of Mr. Hodgman’s new book, More Information Than You Require, also available in Audiobook Form

havoc-hodgman.jpg

Download “An Evening With John Hodgman & Ken Plume II“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-john_hodgman.mp3]

Check out the rest of this year’s Holiday Havoc – and past Havoc – HERE

holly.jpg

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

December 21, 2009

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & James Urbaniak

Filed under: A Bit Of A Chat With Ken Plume,Interviews — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 4:19 am

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I chat with the actor behind THE VENTURE BROS’ own Dr. Thaddeus “Rusty” Venture and AMERICAN SPLENDOR’s Robert Crumb, who’s also a bit of a net bon vivant/commentator, James Urbaniak…

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & James Urbaniak“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-james_urbaniak.mp3]

holly.jpg

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

December 16, 2009

Party Favors: They Call Him Flipper

Filed under: Interviews,Joe Corey's Party Favors — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 10:22 pm

partyfavors1.jpg

TACOMA – Who could imagine making a documentary about dolphins could lead to so much trouble. When director Louie Psihoyos exposed what the Japanese locals were doing to dolphins in Taiji, Japan in The Cove, he found himself a wanted man. This sea-side community celebrates their relationship with the dolphin. But there’s a darkside when they herd dolphins into a cove, sell the prized ones to aquariums for $150,000 each. The remaining dolphins are slaughtered and given to school kids as whale meat. He found himself wanted by the Japanese law for various charges including videotaping undercover police officers.

Certain folks have defended this slaughter as cultural dining. How dare Americans protest what the Japanese eat. The falsely labeled dolphin meat has toxic levels of mercury. Remember that this is the same Japan that will shut off imports of American agriculture and livestock with the rumor of something being amiss. Yet they had no problem giving their children mercury poisoning.

The Cove isn’t merely a talking heads with archival footage documentary. Psihoyos is a cameraman for National Geographic and part of Oceanic Preservation Society. He joins other activists in a clandestine effort to film the hidden slaughter. The film is an espionage thriller with hidden cameras, stealth operations and undercover cops. There’s also a supporting role from Heroes‘ Hayden Panettiere. The film recently won best documentary from the National Board of Review and is on the Academy Award shortlist for nomination eligibility.

The Cove arrives on Blu-ray and DVD this December 8. Director Psihoyos called up the Party Favors hotline. Listen in as we discuss mercury poisoning, the impact the film has had on the dolphin slaughter and the Japanese legal system.

DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
Party Favors: Joe Corey Chats with THE COVE’s Louie Psihoyos (MP3 format)

[audio:http://www.smodcast.net/partyfavors/party_favors-the_cove.mp3]

The Cove has already had an impact in popular culture with a South Park episode based on it.

HUMPDAY EVERYDAY

Always be careful when drinking with old college buddies because you never know what you’ll talk each other into doing to prove you’re not elderly sell outs. Such was the message of Humpday. The Sundance darling is one of my favorite comedies of the year. The Blu-ray and DVD have just been released. Stars Joshua Leonard and Mark Duplass called up the Party Favors hotline to discuss their buddy comedy.

Humpday got its start with a chance meeting in the land of Starbucks and drizzle.

“I met Lynn on the set of this movie called True Adolescents that I was acting in up in Seattle,” Duplass said. “She was doing stills. We knew of each other. We hit it off as filmmakers in what we believe in when in making movies: improvisation, naturalism and a strong plot. She said, ‘I want to build a movie around you.’ I said, Great, sounds like fun. She called me about a month later and said, ‘I have this idea for a movie about two straight guys who get obsessed with a porn film festival called Hump.’ It’s a real festival in Seattle. I immediately loved it. I said we should do it as two guys try to have sex with each other over the course of a weekend.”

While Duplass was the first actor involved in the project, Shelton had him lined up for the vagabond pal.

“She initially approached me about playing Andrew, the character that Josh plays. I had just played a similar character in a movie. Let me play the married guy. I’m married now so I know what its about. I’ll get a haircut and clean up. And at that point we brought Josh onboard.

“I had not worked with Josh. Lynn said, ‘I don’t know anybody that could play this role.’ My brother Jay had just met Josh at a film independent lab that Jay was mentoring. Josh was a big fan of my brother and I’s first feature, The Puffy Chair. We were huge fans of what he’d done in The Blair Witch Project. More importantly, I didn’t know him that well, but I knew enough to know that we had a very special dynamic. Josh and I became friends very quickly and got very close very quickly. I think it had something to do that we are both very headstrong, very type A and have a ton of respect for each other. I really love him. We also have a side to our personalities that in this life it works great for us. In another life, if we’d been born on different sides of a battlefield, we could tear each other’s faces off. It something about that special love-hate bond that made it right for the role.”

Leonard has a different memory of how he became part of the Humpday duo.

“I got tricked into it,” Leonard declared. “I was dear friends with Mark Duplass. I knew of Lynn, but didn’t necessarily know her work. I was in New York doing a play when I got an email from Mark, who I adore as my friend and think the world of as a filmmaker. He said, ‘You want to play my best friend in this movie?’ I said absolutely, man. I’d love to as long as we can work the schedule out. He sent me an email back saying, ‘Great. Remember that you’ve already committed to it. It’s a film about two straight guys who try to make a gay porn.’ To which I responded, ‘OK. I trust your taste, but please, as my friend, never let me commit to anything without asking what it’s about first.'”

Since the movie was improvised, the principles had to focus on the characters’ history.

“We worked with some backstory, Josh, Lynn and I had these little summits in the backroom of my house in L.A. We had one particular long weekend were we stayed up and talked about the history of the guys. What we quickly came up with was they were best friends in college, but more importantly best friends at that time in life when the world seems open. You’re cocky, young and brash and feel like you can do anything. That reminds them, now in their early 30s, that they’ve lost that spark and they’ve lost that way. They want it back. And they are constantly colliding into each other trying to figure out how to get that back. They come up with a ridiculous way of doing it.”

The idea of the duo making the gay porn comes up during a small party. While the characters are seen drinking, Were other libations supposed to be ingested during the scene?

“There was a little bit of pot smoking going on if you can catch it,” Duplass said. “It was the pot and alcohol. We talked about the idea of taking it deeper into drugs. But we didn’t want to cheapen it and make it seem like it was just the drugs speaking. We wanted to get them tipsy enough that they could do it, but not so tipsy that it wasn’t rooted in their desires.”

During this talk of gay sex at the party, Leonard’s character gets frisky with Monica played by Lynn Shelton. Was that a perk for the part?

“I do wind up making out with Lynn” said Leonard. “That was my one contractual stipulation. I had to make out with the director. I try to put that in all my contracts. This is the first time it worked out.”

Duplass also had his time making out with a woman before heading off to the hotel room with Leonard. Alycia Delmore played his wife. They built up their relationship using 21st century help.

“We talked on the phone and did some iChats ahead of time,” Duplass said. “We both had a pretty good understanding of our characters so we didn’t really talk to much about backstories between them. Alycia had such a good grasp of her character and it’s such a tough character to play. It can so easily become the cuckold who doesn’t know what’s going on and is not intelligent or the person that knows everything that’s going on and is a shrew. She rode that fine line so well, I followed a lot of her leads on these things. It was my job to bring her all the terrible news and feel her reaction.”

The interaction between the cast and crew helped the improv story take shape. “It was a team effort completely,” Leonard said. “It was one of those rare scenarios where the best idea always won and it didn’t matter whose it was. Nobody cared where it came from.”

And it seemed that nobody in the crew knew how the film was going to end.

“We shot the whole film in sequence and that was the last scene we shot,” Duplass said. “While each scene was improvised, they were very plotted out where the characters wanted to go. The final scene we didn’t do any plotting or what should or could or would happen. We were checking into a motel at 7 o’clock tonight and checking out tomorrow morning at seven a.m. We’ll see what we get. We were shooting 50 minute takes. Just going and going and going. Interestingly enough, on the first take we did, about 80 percent of what we did in that first take is in the movie. At that point you know your characters so well, you’re living them, you just follow your instincts.”

The one buggy thing about the motel scene was there wasn’t a tripod on the videocamera. Why didn’t they have the essential tool for the aspiring home porn stars who want to be able to use all hands in the action?

“We didn’t want to get too involved in the semantics of it,” Duplass said. “Ben is trying to decide at the last minute if he’s going to go or not based on the conversation with his wife. Because it’s so last minute he’s only able to come up with this home videocamera approach. There’s a purity to that being less about anything technical and more about saying, it doesn’t matter what equipment we have. It’s all about capturing the moment.”

In the hotel room for those twelve hours was Mark, Josh, the cameraman, the soundguy and director Lynn Shelton running a camera. How did the duo keep up the awkward feeling through out the night?

“It wasn’t that difficult,” Leonard said. “I was standing with my buddy in my not particularly toned body in my boxer shorts trying to figure out a way to make sweet love to him.”

Neither actor felt the pressure to spend months in the gym to achieve Mario Lopez six packs. “Fortunately for press purposes we can tell everyone that we both gained weight for the roles,” Leonard said. “Raging Bull ain’t got nothing on us.”

Both men have been busy over the last year. Leonard played Jane Adam’s boyfriend on HBO’s Hung. He’s unsure if he’ll be in the upcoming season. “I haven’t even talked to those guys about that,” he said.

Most of his attention is focused on a bigger project. “I just directed a feature based on a T. Coraghessan Boyle story called The Lie. It’s about a guy who doesn’t want to go to work so he lies to his boss that his newborn baby has just died. The movie takes place in the ensuing five days between the time that the guy throws a grenade on his life and when it blows up in his face. It was done the same way. We arced out the treatment and improvised the dialogue. Ben Kasulke who shot Humpday shot this one.

“It was the coolest group of people. It was literally one of those experiences where I called all my favorite actor friends and had them come out for a couple days. We had a five month old baby as the third lead. It was not an easy shoot.” The film stars Jane Adams, Kelli Garner, Allison Anders and Holly Woodlawn.

Duplass’ upcoming film with his brother Jay Duplass will be screened at the upcoming Sundance. You might have caught him on FX’s The League. He’s the stud of a fantasy football league.

“We had a series of meeting with the creators of The League that went on for about six months,” he said. “I was concerned about my schedule doing a TV show since my brother and I have a pretty hefty writing-directing career. We work a lot. They said, we really want you. They guaranteed me a small amount of time that I have to work on the show.”

Coincidentally in the first episode, there’s a moment that deals with him and anal penetration. Does he fear being typecast as the heterosexual guy with the tempting backdoor?

“I’m hopeful, really,” Duplass said. “Jack Black plays musicians. I play the butthole guy. We’ve both got our niche.”

DIDN’T YOU DIE

Joshua Leonard might look somewhat familiar since he was in The Blair Witch Project. I inform Leonard that I spent a year worried about him after being shown the original teaser almost a year before the release when it was still supposedly real. I kept calling a pal to find out what was on the discovered film. Had the filmmaking trio been located?

“You weren’t the one who called my parents to offer your condolences?” Leonard asked. “Right when stuff first started coming out, they got a lot of condolence calls. They took that reality marketing to the nth degree.”

FESTIVUS SPECIAL

Happy Festivus. Now prepare to wrestle me for the last slice of meatloaf!

TIGER TRAPPED

Tiger Woods has let his fans down not because he had an affair, but because he screwed a skank from VH1’s Tool Academy. He’s the greatest golfer in the universe worth billions and he dumpster dives for a mistress. How exactly did he expect discretion from a celebutard?

It’s a miracle he can stand steady and focus on a putt since VH1 ought to be VD1 with their toxic dating pool. I often visit a health clinic for testing after accidentally exposing myself to For the Love of Ray J. Can you catch crabs from sitting too close to the TV?

No wonder his wife went after him with a golf club. Tiger was on the slippery slope of scooping up Brett Michael’s Rock of Love rejects as they fall from the bus. Tiger Woods might have ended up in a Devil’s threeway with Flavor Flav if Mrs. Woods didn’t break out the pitching wedge. That’s the rehab Dr. Drew needs to dish out.

INVEST NOW

Too many people have been caught up in Fox News’ conspiracy to inflate gold prices on the rumor of an upcoming robot holocaust religious war. Why in the middle of a Road Warrior future is gold really a good investment?

I watch enough warriors of the apocalypse films. It is my supremely educated opinion that in such a bleak scenario, there’s only two investments for the smart survivalists: water and hot young women. Which means you can get rich in the ground floor of a hot market. Party Favors wants your unwanted water and hot young women with Cash4H20andHOS. Just call our hotline number and we’ll send you an insured envelope. Fill the envelope with water and women and mail it back. Our professional experts will grade the contents and we’ll send you a check. Remember to not send us your crazy girlfriend. Even radioactive mutant freaks don’t want them or crazy cat ladies. They might want the cats for appetizers. You can send them to Cash4Cats.

Don’t delay and quit listening to Glenn Beck with his gold lies. Call 1-800-Cash4H20andHOS before the FBI shuts us down again.

MR DVD

Did anyone expect Wes Anderson’s The Fantastic Mr. Fox to completely implode upon wide release? How can you go wrong with distributing a kid’s film during the Christmas season? Earlier in the fall Spike Jonze’s adaptation of Maurice Sendak’s Where the Wild Things Are earned over $75 million. How did Anderson’s version Roald Dahl’s Fox barely adaptation of Fox not even clear a third of Wild Things opening week and fall off the Top 10 chart by the second weekend? Was it too adult for kids and too childish for adults? Was nobody interested in a Paddington Bear-esque stop-motion animation flick? Or was it that Anderson’s cinema aesthetic has cooled off the folks that might have been curious in seeing Fox? Who became the target of producer Scott Rudin’s Monday morning bagel missile?

Seeing how this is Anderson’s third consecutive theatrical thud, is it time he gets his name moved down below the title since it’s obviously not a great selling point? Forget judging the ticket sales against the rumored budgets. Five of his six theatrical releases didn’t earn enough money at the box office to cover the cost of advertising, promotions and striking 35mm prints. His core audience seems to be people who eager to collect the Criterion Collection discs of his movies. He’s a home video superstar star like a 21st Century Andrew Stevens except he’s got Bill Murray instead of Shannon Tweed.

SEASONAL WISHES

If I have one Christmas wish, it’s the return of saxophonists in the world of Rock music. Don’t let Kenny G. make the sax an instrument of wussdom.

If I can get a second one: Joel McHale and Patrick Warburton each need to host Saturday Night Live this season. Enough with the barely talented tweens stretching on the show.

Final wish would be simple – scratch and win on a Ric Flair lottery ticket.

CHRISTMAS GIFTS

This year’s annual Christmas gifts to grab have been mixed up. First off is Warners deciding to not come out with Looney Tunes – Golden Collection, Volume 7. They also held back on putting out anymore Popeye cartoons. So much for real vintage cartoons this year. However there are the megasets of Transformers: 25th Anniversary Matrix of Leadership Edition and G.I. Joe A Real American Hero: Complete Collector’s Set that gives all their ’80s animated goodness.

Normally I’d list Saturday Night Live: The Complete Fifth Season as a must grab. This was the season with the last of the Not Ready for Prime Time Players after Dan Aykroyd and John Belushi left. This was the end of the Buck Henry hosted episodes. Ultimately this is the last season of SNL that I’d willing pick up as boxset. Recently the first four seasons have been going at various stores for $15 instead of $70. I can wait till the price drop hits.

There is one thing on my must get list: The Complete Peanuts 1971-1974 contains volume 11 & 12 in the series. This is the time when Lucy and Linus get their brother Rerun. Also the birth of Joe Cool takes center stage. There’s still 25 years to go before Charles Schulz ended the strip. This should be a constant gift under the tree until 2016. Hope the world doesn’t end in 2012 cause I do want to see what I missed in the ’90s.

BLU-RAY HEAVEN

G-Force seemed like a joke movie poster in Tracy Morgan’s 30 Rock dressing room. Turns out they did make a film about a pack of guinea pigs that are high tech secret agents with beyond Bond gadgets. The CGI pets are voiced by major stars like Morgan, Steve Buscemi, Penelope Cruz, Jon Favreau and investment guru Nic Cage. Their unit become victims of government cutbacks. They’re returned to the pet store, but you know their fate won’t be stuck in a kindergarten. They must save the world. Kelli Garner of The Lie also shows up in human form. The Blu-ray looks good with the furry fury of the G-Force. The boxset also includes the DVD and a digital copy so you want watch it on an iPod. There’s plenty of bonus features with Jerry Bruckheimer showing us how he made Nic Cage finally have believable hair in a film. G-Force is the perfect mindless film to watch while enjoying the egg nog this Christmas.

Star Trek: The Original Series – Season 3 Blu-ray completes the Kirk and Spock TV years in 1080p. Like the previous editions, viewers can choose between the original effects and the enhanced HD CGI effects. The reason to get this set is “The Way to Eden” with the invasion of the Space Hippies! Charles Napier (Russ Meyer superstar and Squidbillies sheriff) riffs galactic groovy tunes on his futuristic guitar. Napier’s jaw was made for HiDef. Amongst the large amounts of bonus features is an early cut of “Where No Man Has Gone Before” that’s never been released. This was the second pilot with Kirk finally in the captain’s chair. They didn’t get to the end of their five year mission.

World’s Greatest Dad ruined my belief that Robin Williams is a complete sell out whore. How much hope could there be for him after crapping out Man of the Year and RV. Thankfully Bobcat Goldthwait brought him back to the delicious dark side of comic genius. Williams is a failed writer who is about to get fired from his high school for an unpopular poetry writing course. His son (Spy Kids‘s Daryl Sabara) is a gross teen who likes scat sex videos. Robin lives to flirt with the art teacher (Alexi Gilmore). Things go extremely bad when his son dies in hangs himself while jacking off. Robin does what any parent does in such a case – zips up his son’s pants and makes it look like a normal suicide. He writes a suicide note on the kid’s computer to explain this sad end. The letter becomes a hit. Robin exploits his son’s ghost to rejuvenate his own writing career. How far will he go to achieve success? It just gets extremely uncomfortable as Williams finally gives a performance that just won’t play for the braindead that loved Bicentennial Man. It’s such a relief that Bobcat was able to remind us that Robin Williams isn’t just a schmaltz fiend.

Taxi: The Final Season wraps up a prime sitcom in its fifth season. NBC picked up the show for what wasn’t the great ratings comeback. The big focus for a lot of the episodes were Latka (Andy Kaufman) and Simka (Carol Kane). “The Shloogel Show” is their little party for the rest of the gang. Rev. Jim also dominates the action. “Jim’s Inheritance” has him up for his dad’s fortune. His blood thirsty siblings want him ruled incompetent so they’d control the inheritance. It’s up to Alex (Judd Hirsch) and Louie (Danny DeVito) to back up his semi-sanity. “Scenskees from a Marriage” discloses Latka having a fling with a female cabbie. As punishment, they throw a party. The last male guest will sleep with Simka. “Crime and Punishment” gives the usually quiet Jeff (J. Alan Thomas) an episode. He gets framed for Louie skimming money. He finds himself being arrested. Will Louie confess or let his assistant take the rap? The big finale isn’t really a farewell episode with “Simka’s Monthlies.” She’s going to be deported. Judging how lame other sitcom farewells have been, it’s appreciated that Taxi didn’t wrap it up. We can still dream that Elaine Nardo (Marilu Henner) is hacking around Manhattan.

The Fugitive – Season Three, Volume Two contains the final 15 black and white episodes of this four year chase. No longer would Dr. Richard Kimble (David Janssen) hide in the shadows. “Wife Killer” pours on the pressure when Kimble kidnaps the Man with One Arm. Can he coax a confession and finally gain his freedom? Not to spoil the ending, but there are more episodes. “This’ll Kill You” puts Kimble in the employment of Mickey Rooney at a laundry. “Stroke of Genius” makes Telly Savalas play Beau Bridges’ son. Did Lloyd sign off on this? Telly’s brother George has a bit part. “With Strings Attached” presents Donald Pleasence an almost young. “The White Knight” lets future Mission: Impossible star Steven Hill and Arrested Development‘s Jessica Walter have a forbidden affair with Ted Knight (Too Close For Comfort) investigating. “In a Plain Paper Wrapper” unleashes a mean Kurt Russell under the direction of Richard Donner. Only one more year and Kimble’s entire flight from justice will be captured on DVD.

Perry Mason – Season 4, Volume 2 gives a dozen cases that twist like pretzel justice. “The Case of the Wintry Wife” goes boom when an inventor’s lab explodes. Michael Fox plays the autopsy surgeon. He’s the reason why there’s a Michael J. Fox. “The Case of the Angry Dead Man” has a rich guy gets declared dead even though he survived a near drowning. After a few days of being a ghost, he really does turn up dead. “The Case of the Barefaced Witness” presents Adam West. Always fun to see Batman tangle with Perry Mason (Raymond Burr). “The Case of the Grumbling Grandfather” creaks with Gavin MacLeod (The Love Boat). This is still my favorite legal series with it’s black and white certainty. There’s five more seasons to go.

Wizards of Waverly Place: The Movie – Extended Edition should be your go to holiday gift if you’ve got an elementary school niece. While doing an informal chat with 8 year old girls, I discovered that Selena Gomez has stolen all of Miley Cyrus’ heat. Gomez is part of a family of wizards-in-training. Her dad is played by David DeLuise, Dom’s son. The family goes on vacation and Gomez casts as spell that might wipe the family off the map. The only thing that can reverse her screwed up spell is the “Stone of Dreams.” Imagine the hours of silence as the kids leave you around during post Christmas cool down.

The Tudors The Complete Third Season gives us even more of Henry VIII’s wives. Anne Boleyn met the axe so now Henry (Jonathan Rhys Meyers) is on the prowl for a third wife. He’s also dealing with an insurrection upset at the ousting of the Catholic Church from England. Mostly they hate Thomas Cromwell (James Frain). Jane Seymour is next on base. She knows it’s all about popping out a boy to maintain her head. I don’t want to spoil this for those who skipped English history class, but Jane didn’t live for centuries to create the Open Hearts design. Henry remarries Anna of Cleeve (singer Joss Stone). This is a gutsy role since Stone is savaged as trollish. He moves onto Katherine Howard. She’s quite the minx. There’s only 8 episodes for this season even with three fresh wives in the mix. The next season on Showtime will wrap up Henry’s serial marrying ways along with his life. This is truly a classy production that properly relates history by mixing education with Cinemax After Dark moments.

The Girl From Monaco tangles legal work with a romantic playground. Fabrice Luchini is a major lawyer with strange ticks. He heads to Monaco to defend a notorious character. However the lawyer has plans to drop his legal briefs for Louse Bourgoin. She’s messing with his mind as you’d expect from a vixen of her calibre. When she’s in pure seduction mode, you’ll forget there’s a film going on. He forgets he has a paying client as he goes native. Always nice to have a Riviera tale on the TV screen while it’s getting nippy outside.

Chai Lai Angels: Dangerous Flowers is a Thai flavored take on Charlie’s Angels. This isn’t a carbon copy since you get five female undercover agents. The quintet are brought onto a case to protect the daughter of a professor and martial arts master. Gangsters swear she knows where to find the Andaman Pearl. She needs help from the Angels. There’s plenty of over the top action with plenty of the ladies kicking mobster ass. There’s a sweet car explosion that doesn’t look CGI enhanced. This is so much better than those Drew Barrymore Charlie’s Angels movies. The bonus features include music videos that introduce the five undercover agents.

December 11, 2009

Trailer Park: Jason Reitman of UP IN THE AIR

By Christopher Stipp

The Archives, Right Here

I was able to sit down for a couple of years and pump out a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

Check out my new column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

PUBLIC ENEMIES – DVD Giveaway

public-enemies_dvdShoot me a message at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com to be entered to win one of a few copies I have to give away.

In the action-thriller Public Enemies, acclaimed filmmaker Michael Mann directs Johnny Depp, Christian Bale and Academy Award® winner Marion Cotillard in the story of legendary Depression-era outlaw John Dillinger (Depp) – the charismatic bank robber whose lightning raids made him the number one target of J. Edgar Hoover’s fledgling FBI and its top agent, Melvin Purvis (Bale), and a folk hero to much of the downtrodden public.

No one could stop Dillinger and his gang. No jail could hold him. His charm and audacious jailbreaks endeared him to almost everyone – from his girlfriend Billie Frechette (Cotillard) to an American public who had no sympathy for the banks that had plunged the country into the Depression.

But while the adventures of Dillinger’s gang – later including the sociopathic Baby Face Nelson (Stephen Graham) and Alvin Karpis (Giovanni Ribisi) – thrilled many, Hoover (Billy Crudup) hit on the idea of exploiting the outlaw’s capture as a way to elevate his Bureau of Investigation into the national police force that became the FBI. He made Dillinger America’s first Public Enemy Number One and sent in Purvis, the dashing “Clark Gable of the FBI.”

However, Dillinger and his gang outwitted and outgunned Purvis’ men in wild chases and shootouts. Only after importing a crew of Western ex-lawmen (newly baptized as agents) and orchestrating epic betrayals – from the infamous “Lady in Red” to the Chicago crime boss Frank Nitti – were Purvis, the FBI and their new crew of gunfighters able to close in on Dillinger.

Jason Reitman of UP IN THE AIR – Interview

If you’re ever in a room with Jason Reitman and your job is to interview him, you need to bring good questions.

This isn’t to say that asking the young lad the usual, empty questions like “What was it like working with George Clooney?” won’t get answered. They will. In fact, he’ll answer as he scribbles in a small notebook that keeps track of his commonly asked questions. He’ll then make a pie chart out of it. It’s not a problem if you’re really interested in knowing what it was like working with George Clooney, but if you’re trying to have a talk with the man in a honest, open way it’s as distracting as someone who is chatting with you as they hammer out an e-mail in the background. UP IN THE AIR is a wonderfully composed film that deals with one man’s journey who is trying to realize his goal of being the ultimate road warrior while also trying to indulge in the affections of a woman on his terms before the terms unexpectedly change.

UP IN THE AIR opens in select markets today.

jason2JASON REITMAN: I was in the bookstore and at the time I was looking for something to read. I liked the cover and started reading it and it completely spoke to me.

QUESTION: Jason, the ending worked for me but at any time during the making of the movie or afterwards was there any talk of an alternative or different ending?

REITMAN: No. The ending was one of the first things that came to me. I wanted to make a movie about a character who learned the importance of companionship through loss not through romance. There plenty of times when you look up on screen and say you know, I am kinda like that myself. But, I wanted a film where ““ it was right at the moment when you realize that she’s unavailable that not only did his character realize that he wanted something but the audience wanted it for him.

QUESTION: What has the reaction been to the ending because it took me by surprise?

REITMAN: Mixed. Half the people think he’s going on the road to find someone and spend his life with them and half the people think that he’s going to stay on the road for the company for the rest of his life. And, that’s kind of what I want. I want half the people to think one thing and half the people to think another. That’s when I think I’ve done my job when the audience is split. Like in Juno. Half the people thought it was pro choice and half the people thought it was pro life. And Thank You for Smoking, conservatives thought it was theirs, liberals thought it was theirs, so I really want you to see yourself in the film. And the end of this movie is just a shot of clouds and hopefully it’s a moment for the audience themselves to think about what they want for themselves. It really doesn’t matter what the character does ““ he’s fictitious.

QUESTION: You felt good about the casting and meeting up with George Clooney?

REITMAN: Yes. Certainly. I wrote it for George and I told his agent that and he said you should go see him in Italy. I thought that was an awful idea. And I got to his house and he had not read the script yet and spent a couple days at his house in Lake Como and he finally walked in and said to me I just read the script and it’s great. It was such a wonderful holiday. He’s lovely. Everything you hear about him is true. He’s magnanimous and makes you feel comfortable. Unlike most movie stars who want to create barriers he breaks that barrier down immediately. Within a group of people he’s working with, he makes you comfortable and that’s really nice. I work with all kinds of people and part of the job is understanding people and learning how to manipulate people ““ that’s the whole job.

QUESTION: Were you the victim of any George Clooney practical jokes?

REITMAN: No, that’s funny. Everyone asks me that and I kind of wish now that there had been some pranks on set because I have nothing to report. Guess he pranks people that deserve it and I guess he liked us.

QUESTION: Are you keeping track of our questions?

REITMAN: I’m keeping track of every question that I’m asked. I am going to show you a pie chart of all the questions I’m asked”¦..asked about Ghostbusters 3 twelve times in the last week. Make it 13…

jason3QUESTION: How tough was it for you to make George kind of detached, kind of a propagandistic? He’s kind of hard to like in the beginning but obviously at the end we feel great, he warms by the end of it. Creating this character he’s very cold and very standoffish. It was a rift I would think to take a character like him and make him not so likeable in the beginning and then shift that towards the end.

REITMAN: It’s funny, because I find that sometimes audiences find Michael likeable from the beginning and sometimes they don’t and it has a lot to do with your perspective of his lifestyle. If you kind of embrace his version of life at the beginning of the film then he doesn’t come off cold, he’s more likeable. There’s something oddly exotic being around strangers all the time instead of the same old people. I don’t get along very well with my family so I really think that character in the film is just as much me. Really, it’s not about making somebody likeable or unlikable or positive or negative. I don’t really believe in that. I think that human beings are grey, not black and white. Unlikable just means that one person”¦.hey, someone married Hitler. We’re all grey. So I just want to humanize his life as much as possible.

QUESTION: What did you learn after this experience that you didn’t know before?

REITMAN: I think I’ve become a better director. Just over my three films I’ve become more detailed in my filmmaking. I think my first film was basically a satire and lived in an elevated reality and was much more contrarian and funny. And over the last few films, Juno and now this one I’ve become more and more interested in the human experience rather than just being funny. This film has as much of me in it as any film I can imagine. And a lot has to do with trusting my instincts.

QUESTION: There is a lot of depth and substance going on in this film.

REITMAN: We are all faced with what we want in our lives and who we want in our lives and it’s becoming a more complicated question because of technology that we view ourselves oddly closer to more people ““ let’s say we have 1,000 friends on Facebook but we not ever see them. And because of technology we are actually distancing ourselves. We are in a strange moment in time where we can be everywhere and nowhere at the same time. And that raises a lot of questions as to who are you going to be lose to and how are you going to be close to them?

jason4QUESTION: I was just going to ask you about Twitter. I see you tweet quite a bit.

REITMAN: Yes.

QUESTION: I’ve noticed in the last few days you tweet as much as I do.

REITMAN: Is it entertaining?

QUESTION: Yes it is actually.

REITMAN: Am I tweeting too much? Should I hold back a little? It’s a very tricky entertainment form.

QUESTION: So do you think Simmons is your good luck charm?

REITMAN: Yes. He is. Woody Allen and Alfred Hitchcock had all these beautiful women as their muses and I have J.K. Simmons.

(Laughs)

REITMAN: He’s in every movie I do. He’s just my voice.

QUESTION: It seems like J.K. Simons and Jason Bateman are always in the same movie. Are they a package deal?

REITMAN: That’s true. They were in Extract. That’s funny. Do you know what it is? They are just great guys. Bill Macy also. When you start to see people cast over and over, there is a reason why. It’s one, they are great to be on set and two, they know how to do their job ““ cine-technicians.

QUESTION: You said this movie is about the closest thing you’ve written to an original screenplay. I’ve seen your previous interviews where you said you have distilled more of your own life experience into this book ““ how did you approach writing this knowing that you had a book and also wanted to diffuse your own elements into that. How long was that process?

REITMAN: It took six years to write and to give you an idea, Alex is not in the book, Natalie is not in the book, firing on line is not in the book, the backpack speech is not in the book, the wedding is not in the book, cardboard cut-out is not in the book, so, the plot is very much my own. I took a character philosophy that I really identified with and went from there and made my own film. It was a journalist who actually put it best, and I wish I could say I wrote this but I didn’t, he said to me the book is about a man losing it and the movie is about a man finding it. I thought that was appropriately said.

QUESTION: How much did the economy affect the film?

REITMAN: When I originally started writing this I saw it as a satire, a corporate satire and as I changed and the world changed, I realized that I need to be more authentic in the way I approach people losing their jobs and I’m sure you know this but we put ads in the paper and got real people to come in and go on camera as people get fired in the film.

QUESTION: After the success of Juno it is still difficult to get movies made. Do you still have to struggle to execute your own particular vision?

REITMAN: Juno really changed my life. That was a movie that was made for $7 million dollars and went on to earn $230 million. It’s so strange. I wrote the script and no one ever pushed me on anything. Paramount really supported me and the vision of this film and it’s harder and harder to make these kinds of movies these days but they really went to bat for me.

QUESTION: Even your co-producer?

REITMAN: My dad you mean? Yeah, my dad went to bat for me too.

(Laughs)

QUESTION: Did you meet Walter Kirn at all?

REITMAN: Yes. Walter and I are friends now. I make a cordial reach out to the authors that I work with ““ Chris Buckley, Walter Kirn, Diablo Cody and I are very close and now I work with Jenny Lument and Joyce Major in two different projects. I have become close with both of them. Never really want to get into a Stanley Kubrick situation ““ there’s no point. So, I reach out and try to make it very clear from the beginning that look a movie and a book are two different things and I’m making a movie here and not a book but I have a tremendous amount of respect for the work they did and try to keep them in the loop but a movie is not a book. Some authors feel like they have been kicked aside and I try and make them feel the opposite.

jason1QUESTION: I flew back from LA this morning and I used my Southwest Avis card to cut in line. What kinds of cards to you have that you feel powerful ““ cards with points?

REITMAN: I am proudest of my Academy card. It is the most exciting to me. I carry that everywhere proudly. I took a flight from out of Chicago and back in the summer once just to retain my status.

(Laughs)

QUESTION: You mentioned the Academy ““ just before you came in we were talking about the best picture nominees, how do you feel?

REITMAN: I don’t like it. It could wind up very favorable for me. I think that ““ look it’s been around for 80 years and call me a traditionalist but I like that there were five. That made it a more exclusive club and Juno got in when it’s was there was just five and doesn’t have an asterisk next to it. I would like to have been consulted. I’m a member of the academy. It’s not like I voted on this. I just woke up one morning and there was a new rule and it seems to have been done for the wrong reasons. The Oscars is one of the few achievements that seem to mean anything and it’s just sad ““ I don’t know what they were going after. I don’t think GI Joe is suddenly going to be nominated. I don’t buy it.

QUESTION: Isn’t it also about the music?

REITMAN: I think the music category is a little messed up and I’ve had two movies in a row with great songs and songs that are ineligible. Songs that were unpublished songs. The song from Juno, and the song that Brad Smith wrote for this movie. Never published. It is an original song and rules just made it ineligible. It’s a Disney rule.

(Laughs)

CHRISTOPHER STIPP: I read in an interview you related a great story about when you first started doing a lot of this film work in high school when you were investigating something going on in your school and you literally had a camera flipped on you. It struck me as interesting that a process of something so simple could suddenly change the way you view something. To a larger point, how do you keep things fresh about the way you see yourself as a director to make sure you are not going to stay in your own comfort zone?

REITMAN: I just try to keep myself open to new experiences. I love going into places where I know nobody and talk to strangers and hopefully that constant influx of conversation will keep me a little bit fresh. Everyone runs out of things to say.

QUESTION: Do you think you will?

REITMAN: Every director. Except maybe Kubrick. I think everyone does and it’s just a fact of life. Musicians, every artist does. And at that point I hope I’ll find happiness from something else.

CS: That speaks to the point of the movie that you’re doing it because you need ““ these people that are getting fired depend on these little jobs to keep their lives in balance and once these things go away people are like in freefall ““ did it have an effect on you personally or the way you look at your job?

REITMAN: Yes. A real sense of purpose from the filmmaking. I do it 7 days a week and it’s what I live for. That’s the only way to be a filmmaker because it’s too competitive. If anyone took that away from me, it would be really tough.

QUESTION: You mentioned Jenny Lument. Are you in a position to elaborate on that project?

REITMAN: A little bit. Basically she written a wonderful screenplay ““ I’m working on it with her right now ““ she approached the girl who wrote Rachel Getting Married and I just love it.

QUESTION: A period piece? Contemporary?

REITMAN: Contemporary. I don’t think I could make a period piece. I don’t really care about people who lived in the past. I don’t understand why their stories need to be told and retold. If you’ve ever seen someone making a movie with someone in a petticoat ““ it’s”¦

(Laughs)

To be fair, Thank You for Smoking was a time piece and we made it to that time. It was about 1997 and Joyce Major’s book takes place in the late 80’s, but I have a point of view on those because I was alive during that time but I won’t be making a movie about an era I don’t have some sort of perspective on. Maybe that will change. I don’t know. You never say never.

jason5QUESTION: The fashion design, you had the uniformity of the hotel rooms you had the sparseness of Ryan’s apartment and then cue up to the sequence in Milwaukee where you had that arcane, older chalet type hotel. Can you elaborate more on that?

REITMAN: We made a decision that we were going to make an arch across the film that costumes, lighting, extras, shooting, design, everything in which the beginning of the movie was going to be beautifully lit and stylish and shot slickly and over the course of the film it would become more and more warmed it up and by the end of the film, we’d be shooting hand held, using long lenses, and warm lighting. Even the extras at the beginning of the film were chosen because they were better looking and in better shape. We were looking for more average at the end of the film, walking through the airport, it’s hand held, people are dressed sloppy, people are mopping the floor, the lighting is not as pretty and the movie goes through an overall transition from slick to real.

CS: There’s the old adage that a movie is made three times, once when you write it, once when you shoot it and once when you edit it. Did you find along those lines you were discovering those things you weren’t expecting?

REITMAN: Oh yeah. The movie tells itself. It’s even more than three times. One movie changes every day. I like to consider it one long process. Yea, I want to get it to the screen and it’s going to require me to do all these different things along the way ““ involving many different departments making thousands of decisions a day, whether you know it or not and it’s a constant discovery process. In other words, the process starts with an idea and then ends with the same idea.

QUESTION: What’s your favorite Ivan Reitman movie?

REITMAN: It’s tough because what was his most import film? What was his most influential film? It would be a different answer for each. If I was to sit down and watch any one of his films right now I’d pull up Stripes. That’s the most fun to watch. He’s the most culturally impactful film is either Ghostbusters or Animal House depending on what you’re looking at. And his best movie is probably, Dave.

QUESTION: Did you take that patch that you found at the TV station?

arizonaREITMAN: No, I’m not that rude. It was crazy to see that. The Arizona state flag / Ghostbusters patch where this ghost picks up this symbol of the cross that was made out of the Arizona state flag.

QUESTION: What are your thoughts about film critics?

REITMAN: Film critics, I think in my case, are very important because they are the reason people see my kind of movies. In increasing noise, they are one of the last voice boxes that give people to see movies that are made for adults. There’s plenty of marketing out there for films that are made for kids. So as one of the few people who try to make movies for adults, I am very grateful that the critic still exists and hold weight.

QUESTION: Bet you weren’t impressed with GI Joe? Not your best picture nominee?

(Laughs)

REITMAN: GI Joe? I liked the scene when he puts his arm out and the venom finds it’s way out. That was pretty cool.

CS: If you are a director, does Michael Bay through school saying, “I’m going to make Michael Bay kind of movies?”

REITMAN: I don’t think you go through school thinking you’re going to make a certain kind of movie, you just start making movies and say, “Oh, I guess I’m that kind of a director.” I would love to co-direct a movie with Michael Bay. I’d like to do a movie where he directs all the drama and I direct all the action.

(Laughs)

“From the makers of Transformers and Juno”¦”

(Laughs)

I think that would be awesome. I did float that to Paramount. I’m still up for it but not sure Michael would be up for it.

QUESTION: Would you be up for MTV music video awards or movie awards?

REITMAN: No, no

QUESTION: Oh, full feature length

REITMAN: Yeah, gotta spend $500 million ““ should cost a fortune. But, again, if I run out of things to say, maybe I’ll direct one of those films. But in the meantime I like small personal films. That’s what gets me excited.

QUESTION: I was there last night when you talked about that quote from the writer who made”¦

REITMAN: I still have to do research. I work from the heart and it’s a story I want to tell. That’s more important to me than details of what actually happened. The story was, there was an interview and the guys asked “How to you figure out all these kinds of things that various explosives work” and he goes, “I don’t even know what a detonator is. I just like the word.” What a great quote, right? You can tell sometimes when a writer cares too much about the details and what happened and cares too little about real drama. But you guys are journalists; it speaks to what you do. Like Shattered Glass.

(Laughs)

CS: The movie itself is sort of a meditation on the nature of work of doing what you love or doing what you like or doing what you’re feeling comfortable in doing. Because I have a job and I like my little place and I don’t know what I’d do without it. I’ve been laid off 3 times before and I’m 34 and I’m not really big on “the man” but what is the nature of work to you?

REITMAN: It defines me. It’s who I am. I’m a director. When you introduce me to someone, that’s the first thing you would say about me. It’s what I wake up and go to sleep thinking about. I think this film. Someone told me when a film works it’s a mirror. When any story works, it’s a mirror. You simply see yourself in it and that’s very important to me. I won’t let you see me in my work, I will only let you see yourself. Like when I did “Smoking”, I didn’t do The Insider. I didn’t make a movie to end up asking you a question – in the fact that the movie speaks to you in that way makes me happy because it speaks to you individually in that way. I don’t make movies to change people, I just want people to see themselves in them.

Trailer Park: Tao Ruspoli of FIX

Filed under: Interviews,Trailer Park — Tags: , , , , — admin @ 2:15 am

By Christopher Stipp

The Archives, Right Here

I was able to sit down for a couple of years and pump out a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

Check out my new column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

Tao Ruspoli – Interview

FIX is one of those movies you didn’t know you needed to see until you’re ensconced in the reality that director Tao Ruspoli made a movie with a compelling premise, is shot with a style that blends fiction and reality in a real exciting way, and is a completely independent vision. People can get hung up on particulars when it comes to a movie’s presentation when you are saddled with a low budget but Tao completely bucks that by incorporating his low budget into a style that makes the movie feel more authentic. When you’re able to have Oliver Stone provide a pull-quote for your movie, things are going well.

Based on a story where a filmmaker is on the hunt for his brother in order to find him and deliver him to rehab or have the guy shipped back to prison for a three year sentence, FIX happens all in one day and explores the nuances, pieces of Los Angeles that don’t normally get shown in films that use Tinseltown as a backdrop. The pace is furious, the clock is ticking, and the film couldn’t be any more enjoyable than it is. Tao Ruspoli spent some time talking with me about his film.

FIX is now playing and will soon be out on DVD.  (Add it to your Netflix queue)

tao4CHRISTOPHER STIPP:  Hello, Tao.

TAO RUSPOLI: Hi, how are you doing?

CS:  I’m doing fine.  What’s this process been like to finally get this movie out in the open, at least theatrically for you?

RUSPOLI: Well, it’s been so gratifying.  I’ve gotten used to the idea that it’s an uphill battle for independent films these days, but it’s been gratifying throughout.  We’ve gone to 35 film festivals, traveled all over the world, and already, that was beyond anything I expected from the movie.  So now a year and a half later for it to come out is just the icing.  I’m so happy that the public will be able to see it at last.

CS:  Please tell me ““ and I wanted to save this question for you ““ it says based on true events and I want to know how true is this movie, it has a great premise, how true is this?

RUSPOLI: The premise is what’s true.  What happened was my brother’s battles with addictions throughout his life and he had gotten a deal (this was several years ago) from a judge that said, well, you can either go to rehab or I’m going to send you to prison for 3 years.  And of course he chose rehab and the judge gave him 10 days in the rehab.  On the 8th day he got arrested for something else.

I was working in San Francisco working on a documentary and I got a call from his lawyer saying someone has to bail him out tomorrow and get him back to rehab by 8:00 o’clock tomorrow night he’s going to prison for 3 years because he’ll be in breech of this judgment.  So, that’s what happened.  I drove down overnight and picked him up and found out that $5,000 was needed to admit him to rehab and the way we got the $5,000 was not as exciting as it was in the movie.  It just was going around and borrowing from friends and my credit card a little bit.  So we dropped him off ““ and I don’t want to give away anything ““ but those are the true facts.  The structure is true but then all of the in between was scripted.  I got to spend some time with my brother.  Recklessness on one hand is scary for some people but he lives life to the fullest and takes risks that a lot of us are afraid to take and travel into worlds that many of us don’t travel in.

I think our job as filmmakers is to expands people’s worlds a little bit and that’s what the lead character does in the movie.  His nickname is Hermes and the precept is it’s his graffiti writing name but actually Hermes was the god of crossing boundaries – guide to the underworld and that’s what he is to us.

CS:  Now the film itself, obviously, Olivia was the main attraction in the film as she mentioned to me, you had to work around her schedule, like on the weekends and that sort of approach that we can only do these on certain days.  What was that like as a filmmaker to be constrained by when you could shoot this thing?

tao2RUSPOLI: It turned out to be a blessing in disguise.  Two weeks before we started shooting she got the role on House, and of course I couldn’t ask her not to do that.  As much as she loves me I said, OK, we will change the whole schedule around hers.  The producer nearly had a heart attack but then what we ended up doing is shooting the film in order and then edited it during the week and could see how it was coming together and because of that and our style, we got to really learn as we went and learned what worked and how we could get the best of both worlds doing like the documentary film but in a dramatic, visceral style.

So we would shoot for a few days and edit the first 10 minutes of the film or whatever it was and then the next weekend we would shoot the next 10 minutes of the movie.  It was a wonderful process because we really got to know what we had in the can before we kept going.  Usually you cram all this shooting together and then see what you have at the end.

CS:  So I assume you were working with Paul Forte the whole time?

RUSPOLI: Yes, exactly.  Paul would come on set and he’s here now actually.  He came for the premiere.  He’s a very close partner of mine and would be on set capturing the footage.  One crazy story is that we were in Watts shooting in the projects and Paul was in the RV and we thought it was so nice and welcoming and forgot that we in a rather dangerous part of town and so we let our guard down and someone came in with a gun and held him up and took the laptop he was using to capture the footage.  Luckily he had already backed it up and put it on a hard dive that was put away or we wouldn’t have been able to finish the movie because no one would have gone back.

CS:   That kind of speaks to the film, showing a different side of LA that not a whole lot of people know about.  What was it like shooting in all these different locations?  Like you said, some were very welcoming.  Did you find anything unique that you never knew about living in LA?

RUSPOLI: Absolutely.  First of all, that’s what I love about LA.  You have to understand that the movie is about a microcosm of the road movie.  It’s a road movie on concentrate.  You have to imagine that a road movie takes across a great distance and for a long period of time and you see the characters have all been changed as they proceed through different worlds.  Well, this takes that convention and strips it down to it’s essence because you traverse all these worlds that are all in one city and all in one day.  All in one 12 hour period.

I think LA is one of the few places you can do that because it’s like a blank slate in a way and has all these local worlds that a lot of people don’t move from one to the other, so you have Boheminan artist community next to the isolated Beverly Hills community and there’s chop shops in east LA and downtown and rural areas and suburban and the lead character is one who easily goes from one to the other which is very unusual in real life to find somebody who can do that and that’s what’s so charming about him and so compelling that he can feel equally comfortable in a mansion in Beverly Hills as he can in the projects in Watts.  I always loved that about LA.  LA sort of becomes a main character of the movie because it has this very strong presence as this post modern city where there is no center and it’s what you make of it, all decentralized and amazing.

CS:  Looking up on your IMDB page, it proclaims you as a documentary filmmaker.  To me it almost felt like if Michael Moore were to make a straight up a work of fiction that wasn’t strictly documentary ““ was this a different change for you as a filmmaker?

RUSPOLI: Absolutely.  We wrote a script that was very tight but like about the documentary style is that a) I come from it so I felt comfortable telling a story in that way.  Of course a documentarian tells a story as well, right?  But it has this visceral immediate truthfulness I think that hopefully when people watch the film feel this is really happening.  They will wonder how much is real and how much isn’t and the wonderful thing is in the old day, we’ve come a long way since the Blair Witch Project when documentary style meant shaky camera and horrible image quality.

tao1Now with HD you have the best of both worlds.  You have the immediacy of the documentary and you also have this rich color and cinematic quality that is so wonderful that you can achieve now with these high quality digital cameras.  So I really thought it was a great way to move from documentary into narrative.  It was a smooth transition into it.

CS:  I think it’s a natural extension if you ““ I’m not comparing it to paranormal activity which did gang busters ““ but people are not used to it through reality television of consuming a story that is done with a verities style.  People are now more comfortable with it and I think there’s lots of things now ““ the movie itself and correct me if I’m wrong ““ but your film looks ahead of the curve in terms of presenting a narrative but not so much in the traditional style.

RUSPOLI: I think the style is very avant-garde because it doesn’t look like armature camera people.  The filmmaker in the movie is a filmmaker so it makes sense that he would pay attention to structure and composition and go back and make the film as cinematically and in a structured way as possible.  And that’s what people have responded to so much about this movie is that it has an amazing visual style and incredible sound track and editing.  So it doesn’t shy away from making the most of the medium and that’s what I hope is groundbreaking about it.

CS:  When you were getting it all together you were obviously creating a sound track adding, it’a like an exponential sum, and in having to keep the costs down, what did you turn to in order to create this musical bed to carry these characters through the film?

RUSPOLI: Again, since we’re crossing all these worlds we had to use music to reinforce that journey.  The music also crosses from world to world and we have everything from old jazz to blues to like indie rock to hip hop.  Dick Prez did a song just for the movie.  We have I’m a Robot and Simon Dawes and all these incredible musicians.  We have a music supervisor named Bryan Ling who is just phenomenal and a composer named Isaac Sprintis who also just brought a lot of original compositions to the movie.  But, all of it supports that we’re taking a journey through very disparate worlds and the music kind of reflects that.

CS:  Going forward with any new projects that you are doing, did you find that you, being ensconced in this world of sort of a hybrid of a documentary and traditional filmmaking, do you find now that you are inspired by different things or are you now “OK, let me get back to what I really feel comfortable with” and that’s documentary filmmaking?

RUSPOLI: No, I’m moving straight up into narrative.  I’m working on a documentary now called Being in the World which was just submitted to Sundance, so I did go back to documentaries but I’m really excited to do another narrative.  I found the experience so gratifying working with actors.  I hadn’t done that before and it felt natural to me and really fulfilling.  I’ve been reading a lot of scripts now and I actually would like to do a film ““ if not in a documentary style, – do something very cinematic.  I would love to do something that has more time and with a bigger budget and do something more deliberate and more traditional and cinematic.  Hopefully that will come soon.

tao3CS:  Well, sir, I have one more question and that would be, just looking at the path this has taken, it wasn’t done just six months ago, it was a long road for this film.  You mentioned the process was very fulfilling, the length, the ups and the downs, what did you take away from making this film?

RUSPOLI: Again, I learned that the old world of distribution and finishing your film and hoping that someone just buys it and takes it off your hands ““ that’s over.  On one hand, that makes our job harder as filmmakers but on the other hand it keeps the control in our hands which is great.  You have a double edged sword on one hand.  A lot of the indie film structures are dying off and on the other hand through the internet and through these new modes of distribution you can have direct access to your audience and you need to do it.

You need to carry the film like your child and nuture it and see it grow and be involved in the whole process being online and the social networks and go to your own fan base.  I think that’s daunting at first but then it’s great because you have this direct link to the people who like your work and they can be all over the world. And now, for example, we have this initial theatrical run in New York and if it does well it will spread to other cities.

We have a DVD distributor putting it out in February.  It’s exciting and meanwhile while this is happening we have been able to do other projects.  Olivia keeps working on House, I’ve done this other documentary, Being in the World, so it hasn’t just been waiting around.  I’ve traveled to different festivals all over the world, which is a great way to show your films.

Trailer Park: Olivia Wilde of FIX

Filed under: Interviews,Trailer Park — Tags: , , , , , — admin @ 2:06 am

By Christopher Stipp

The Archives, Right Here

I was able to sit down for a couple of years and pump out a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

Check out my new column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

Olivia Wilde of FIX – Interview

You just don’t bring up that Olivia Wilde was named #1 in Maxim’s Hot 100 list of nice looking ladies.

I don’t know if this speaks to the fact I don’t read Maxim or that the only reason I know who she was, before seeing the wonderment that is FIX, was that she sat in on a press conference for TRON LEGACY at Comic-Con over the summer. So enamored I was to speak to Jeff Bridges that I completely gave Wilde the Heisman as I used my one question to talk to The Dude. I felt bad for doing that, as every geek in the room wanted to talk to Jeff about his role in the new TRON iteration but when I had the chance to talk to Olivia about this film I knew I had to address her presence there over the summer.

I only wish all my interviews went as well as my talk with Olivia as chatting about how a movie that had to be shot on the weekends, being directed by your husband Tao Ruspoli and what that did to the relationship, and what this film means to her overall aims as an actress. Sure, playing a part in next year’s behemoth in-making, TRON LEGACY, won’t hurt but she handles herself with the kind of openness not usually seen from actors of her caliber. Just a delight.

FIX is now playing and will soon be available through Netflix.

tao41CHRISTOPHER STIPP:  Hi, Olivia.

OLIVIA WILDE: How are ya?

CS:  Doing fine.  How are you doing?

WILDE: Pretty good.  Exciting weekend.

CS:  I would imagine.

WILDE: Yeah, we had a great premiere.

CS:  Where was the premiere held?

WILDE: The premiere was at The Tribeca Grand Hotel

CS:  Really?

WILDE: It was really, really fun.

CS:  Which gets to the first question I have is that when I was researching this, this isn’t something that was one 6 months ago.  It seems like this movie ““ I should say it’s been out there for a while ““ but it’s seems like there’s a story why it’s taken so long for it to come out.

WILDE: I think it’s like any true independent film. It’s a bit of a process to get widespread distribution because no sacrifices were made in making the film.  We weren’t trying to be commercial.  We were sticking true to the type of film we wanted to make or I should say, Tao wanted to make.  So when you have a film like that and haven’t made any sacrifices, you have to stick to your guns and keep it small.  And the great thing about film festivals is they really appreciate that.  The true indi, art house, honest film.  So we went around the world, went to 35 different festivals and won big awards at about 14 of them and won best actor (tape is blank here Christoph).  For a lot of independent films the last step is finally getting distribution and the great thing about film festivals is that they do provide a home for independent films and for people to see them and we were such a smash hit at these festivals, starting at Slamdance in 2008, it garnered a lot of attention and now we have theatrical distribution in New York on November 20th at the Village East for one week and if that goes well, they’ll go live.  So it’s really exciting.

CS:  I would imagine.  Like you said, it is quite a process now to get these independent films out there to compete with the bigger dogs.

WILDE: Yes.  But, I think people like them.  In a film world awash with G.I. Joe it’s refreshing to see a film that is very unique and very honest and really a labor of love.

CS:  And it feels like that.  One of the questions I was going to ask Tao but I will ask you too, is that he’s primarily known for making documentary films.  This actually seems like a departure of what he’s really known for.  What did you see in this script?  What did he see in this story, and I don’t know how true ““ it says based on real life events, what did he take from that and what did he run with?

WILDE: I think he has documentarian sensibilities which means I think he’s interested in finding the true experience ““ really capturing all the messiness of real life and I think that’s the spontaneity and immediacy that you feel with a documentary, you really feel that with Fix.  As an actor, it changed the process a lot and made it much more of an involved shooting process – meaning that you had to be on at all times.  You never knew when the camera was going to swing around and capture you.  And so it was a lot of fun.  It was more of a teamwork, family, project than anything I’ve ever done and I’ve witnessed it from it’s inception to the premiere.  I really now learned what goes into making a film, which is just extraordinary.

I think Tao, as a documentary filmmaker, is able to really appreciate what we can capture by allowing the camera to linger and what kind of idiosyncrasies and little messy real life moments make a story interesting.  The film ended up being about 25% improvised and I think it’s only possible to have that much freedom if you are shooting in the documentary style because we don’t have to worry to much about continuity and such because it was a single camera and we weren’t covering one person’s coverage one at a time.  It was more of a fly by the seat of your pants process.  I think that’s why the experience of watching it is so exciting.  People aren’t sure what real, who’s an actor, who’s not.

oliviaFor instance, the scene that happens in Watts is entirely made up of non actors except for the main characters.  I think you have a sense for that.  A sense that you are capturing real life.  I think that’s what makes it all so interesting and unique.

CS:  You are used to being ““ like you said in the summer of G.I. Joes ““ you being on the set of big productions to now having to downshift to this independent world where now a catering truck isn’t there ““

(Laughs)

WILDE: It was great.  All those luxuries are great and they are comforting but you really forget what you want to do and that’s to make a story about something together and it involves everyone’s dedication.  I think the fact that we didn’t have hair and makeup, we didn’t have catering, we didn’t have trailers, everyone was completely present at every time.  When we moved, the actors would help the location scouts move a truck.  All the driving in the film is actually real driving.

The line between real and fake is blurred in this film.  And it’s great to be a part of that.  I didn’t feel like I was downshifting.  I was shifting into high gear working harder than I’ve ever worked.  I was invested on an emotional level more than I’d ever been because I am close to the real person it’s based on and the story is something I am intimate with.  So for me it was a challenging experience and so much more personal than anything I’ve ever done.  It was extraordinary to be a part of and something I hope to do again.

CS:  And how was it shooting in Los Angeles proper?  Were you seriously running and gunnng it or were you doing permits and other accruements?

WILDE: We didn’t break any laws but we were definitely grassroots scurrilous style filmmaking.  It was really fun because we were seeing parts of LA that people never see and we were shooting 10 pages a day and really moving fast.  We actually shot mostly in order so it was kind of organic in the way that everything was developing.  I think you can really sense that in the story.  As the character sort of evolves, the filmmaking changes as well because since we were shooting on the weekend we were forced to shoot around my house schedule.  Each weekend we’d have edited the scene from the weekend before so we really had a sense of what we needed.  Everything became sharper by the end and I think that worked.  But that’s only because we were able to shoot in order.

It was really a fascinating to be shooting a scene where I’m driving the 1960 Impala around LA and would actually stop at a fruit stand downtown, buy fruit, work that into the scene, and go to the next location.  Completely organic.  And lots of moments in the film when I watched it for the first time, I was like, oh my god, Tao, I didn’t know you were filming that.  It was kind of amazing that that was all captured and then left it in, which is a testament as well to our amazing editor.  A guy named Paul Forte, who was able to take all this experimentation and weave it together and create a film that feels so natural but you would never know how much work went into it.

Sky 360 by DeltaCS:  That’s a curious thing you bring up to.  You obviously shot a metric ton worth of footage, when you got into the editing room, did Tao, did they see what movie they ended up with and were they surprised at what they eventually came up with?

WILDE: Tao can actually answer that better than I can.  The editing room was actually the bottom floor of our loft so I witnessed a lot of that process.  I think they were amazed at how much was coming out of the shooting process.  The improvisation was adding life to certain scenes where we weren’t sure.  There were scenes that completely exploded hilariously.  One of my favorite scenes is when we go steal the espresso machine.  I love that scene.  It was such a simple scene When they wrote it it was a small tight little scene, maybe a page long and it turned into this fun and surprising moment and I think every actor there just ran with it and it had an energy that no one really expected.  So, surprise moments like that in the editing room were adding flavor and color to the film and they were just getting more and more excited as it went along.  It was such a different process.

Not only did we not have trailers, we all traveled in one funky RV and followed the production car from location to location and the editor would sit in the back with his laptop and download the footage or capture the footage as we shot it.  It was really happening as we were shooting it.  It was amazing to see how far the film had come after we were done shooting it.  So experimental and unique.  People will have a sense of that when they watch it.  A sense of discovery.  I think it would be hard to re-create with a bigger budget or much slower production.

CS:  And one thing about the film, it’s compressed timeline.  Like 16 Candles.  All happens with a tight timeline.  Was that difficult balancing continuity?

WILDE: Yes.  Because whenever you have a film where everything happens in one day you have to think about things like daylight.  The good thing about LA is that the weather never changes so you can sort of lie.  But I think it’s impossible to match completely but I think we came pretty damn close.  We had amazing producers who sat there figuring it all out and timelining it and it was impossible to do but we did a really good job.  I think it’s kind of a real visceral experience of LA that a lot of people have never had.  Dragging from one location to the next and it’s completely how it feels spending the day with Tao’s brother in real life.  You feel you’ve been on this oddesy and you have to real relinquish all control and just learn and I think that’s what the audience has to do while watching Fix and definitely what my character has to do and I feel that she sort of becomes the eyes of the audience.  She represents the journey emotionally the audience goes on, initially skeptical and eventually game.  So it all feels in the end a really fun experience.

olivia2CS:  And speaking of experience, I have to at least ask the question because I was there in July when you were there at Comi-Con.

WILDE: Were you really?  Great.

CS:  I was in that room for the press conference and intrinsically I felt bad because no one was asking you or Garrett anything?

WILDE: I think it was appropriate this year, but next year it’s going to be a different experience.

CS:  How as that?  I’m always curious to know what’s it like to be besieged by screaming geeks and nerds and that experience of what these people love about this movie?

WILDE: I think it’s really an honor at a place like Comi-Con.  They are really discerning fans and I think they feel a certain ownership of a film like  Tron, it’s a part of their lives and feel they know it well and they are sensitive to the recreation of the Tron world and are interested in knowing if it will maintain the integrity that the original had.  It was really fun to reassure them that it indeed would and be able to show them just a tiny bit of evidence of that.

CS:  It was a shred”¦it was just enough.

WILDE: Yes, just enough.  I think it’s good to keep them wanting more and I think next year I think San Diego might explode.  It will be a lot of fun.

(Laughs)

CS:  If I had one more question for you it would be based on your experience in doing this.  Your resume is so impressive.  You have been so accessible.  A movie like this and doing an independent film had to at least put you in check in terms of realizing there is still lots to learn.

WILDE: Yes.  I think it’s important to do that throughout the rest of my career.  I look up to actors who go back to their roots and continue to do small independent small budget films.  Someone like (Parka Pozie?)who is constantly doing small independent experimental films and it’s often where she really gets to shine.  She takes more risks and someone like Catherine Keener is the same.  Kate Blanchett I look up to too, she appeared in Lord of the Rings, and then a Jim Jarnosh film.  So I really look up to that and it does keep you in check.  I certainly learned a lot about the filmmaking process and learned to really respect the independent filmmakers and all that they go through in order to bring their art to the world.  I was certainly humbled by it and can’t wait to do it again.

December 9, 2009

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & David Mitchell

Filed under: A Bit Of A Chat With Ken Plume,Interviews — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 5:32 am

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I chat with writer, actor, and (I’d wager) the quickest wit in the western world, David Mitchell.

Chances are, to most Americans, the name David Mitchell means very little… unless, of course, they have a friend, relation, or acquaintance by that name. I speak, however, of a brilliant comedian by that sobriquet who currently plies his trade in the sceptred isle of England.

A cursory glance at the offerings on YouTube will bring you up to speed on Mr. Mitchell, as well as his comedy partner Robert Webb – both of which, since their Cambridge Footlights days, have written and starred in Edinburgh Fringe productions, radio (That Mitchell & Webb Sound), a live tour, a trio of sketch shows (Bruiser, The Mitchell & Webb Situation, and That Mitchell & Webb Look), and even a book (That Mitchell & Webb Book). They’re also the stars of the Britcom Peep Show, the feature film Magicians, and were cast as PC (Mitchell) & Mac (Webb) in the British versions of the popular Macintosh ads.

As a solo, Mitchell is quick-witted, erudite guest on such UK panel shows as QI, Have I Got News For You, and 8 Out Of 10 Cats, serves as team captain on Would I Lie To You, and is the host of BBC Radio 4’s The Unbelievable Truth.

I urge anyone smart enough to own a region free DVD player to hunt down everything listed above from your online UK DVD emporium of choice, or at the very least scrounge the internet and YouTube for a splendid sampler.

And, if this intro is evoking a sense of déjà vu, it’s because I’ve used it in the past – for my previous in-depth interviews with David (I believe strongly in recycling). I recently sat down in my very comfy desk chair and rang him for a chat…

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & David Mitchell“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-david_mitchell.mp3]

holly.jpg

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

December 4, 2009

Trailer Park: Michael Shannon of THE MISSING PERSON

By Christopher Stipp

The Archives, Right Here

I was able to sit down for a couple of years and pump out a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

Check out my new column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

Michael Shannon of THE MISSING PERSON – Interview

It’s not every day when you are lucky enough to talk to an actor who was not only nominated for an Academy Award for his work in a film like REVOLUTIONARY ROAD, getting edged out by Heath Ledger for his role in THE DARK KNIGHT, but who was also in GROUNDHOG DAY. Honestly, between the former and the latter I am not sure what warrants more kudos but I do know that his work in the new film THE MISSING PERSON is one of the brightest spots in films for 2009.

To talk with Michael is to really love the guy. He speaks with the kind of thoughtfulness and consideration you wish people in your everyday life would use and seems to exude the sense that he’s always observing, always taking in his surroundings. Being an Academy Award nominee ought to have put him in rarefied air but as he expresses below, he does look forward to the day when he can play a role where people aren’t instinctively afraid of him.  I floated the idea of a romantic comedy but I think we both agree that project might be a wee premature. Regardless of the personas he puts on like a finely tailored suit, Michael Shannon still is one to watch and in THE MISSING PERSON he is effortless in the way he navigates a film that showcases his best talents as an actor.

THE MISSING PERSON is now showing.

missing-poster1MICHAEL SHANNON: Hey Chris.

CHRISTOPHER STIPP:  Hey Michael.

SHANNON: How are you?

CS:  I’m doing fine.  How is your press day going?

SHANNON: Good.  We are having fun.

CS:  Is this really a fun part of making a movie that you get to answer the same questions over and over again?

SHANNON: You know, I don’t mind it.  It’s been a while since I made the movie so it’s fun to go back and think about it.

CS:  How is that?  That it takes a while for a movie to get made and takes a little while for it to get out there ““ do you ever get anxious for people to see what you’ve done or are you kind of off doing your next thing once you’re done with a film?

SHANNON: For me it’s like pushing a little boat onto the lake or something.  It sails away and you’re not sure if you are going to see it again.  You just move on and go onto the next thing.  A lot of actors won’t even watch their own movies.  I’m not of that school.  I actually try to enjoy watching the movie if, and when, it comes out because you work really hard on a movie and I like to see the end result.  But I certainly don’t wait around waiting for it to happen.  You have to go on and do the next thing.

CS:  Getting the part seemed ““ just to read it on the surface seems like it was relatively easy.  You had a friend in Amy Ryan and she just happened to pull you along where you got to meet Noah.  Was the process just as smooth as the story makes it out to be?

SHANNON: Well, I did a reading of it and reading are always kind of weird.  I don’t like doing a reading of a screenplay.  It’s such a visual medium.  We sat around and read it and it really read well.  The dialogue was cryptic and it was just a really fun night.  And I think Noah, for whatever reason after the reading, he just felt comfortable with me doing the part.  Obviously, at least at that time, he could have hired profile names for that part and it would have made it easier to finance and distribute but Noah doesn’t really care about any of that.  He goes with his gut.  He’s a very instinctual person.

CS:  Yes.  I talked with him about the film and yes, he amazes me that someone like that can still survive in this business, where it’s not a commodity that can be packaged and bubble wrapped, it makes it a tough sell but it seemed like he still got on the film what he intended to have there with his script.

SHANNON: In his own quiet way, he’s a real warrior.  He had to deal with a lot of uncertainty and doubt from a lot of people but he had a vision and held to it.  That’s why I’m so happy that this film is going to get a life.  If anyone deserves to have a film out there it’s him.

CS:  It absolutely is and it was no hyperbole yesterday when I told him it was one of the better movies I’ve seen this year.  It’s wholly original, wholly it’s own, and you just unfortunately don’t get to see a lot of these films that aren’t spawned by a sequel, or prequel or reboot or rehash.

shannon1SHANNON: Right.

CS:  It must have been appealing to you as an actor to take something that was completely, start from scratch.

SHANNON: There are two instances for me when I have just been blown away by reading the screenplay without even going into production or anything.  And this one, was one of them and the other was Shotgun Stories.  Both of them, just on the page, were very substantial and original and about something meaningful.  In a way, instead of Noah and Jeff Nichols from Shotgun Stories, there are some similarities.  They are both very quiet, very thoughtful and they are really two of my favorites.  I hope to work with Noah a lot more.  It’s hard to tell what his next move will be.  It’s hard for him in this business because he has some standards that he’s not going to let go of.  He’s also not a showy person by nature.

CS:  Right.  I don’t see him directing the next installment of X-Men anytime soon.

(Laughs)

SHANNON: Exactly.

CS:  The character for you was obviously on the page but you had to interpret it in your own way.  What did you see in this character?  What humanity did you bring to it off the page?  What did you see in it?

SHANNON: To me it starts with 9/11.  It’s starts with a man who’s life was ruined on 9/11 and was not able to carry on, which is something that all identify with, at least in our imaginations, if we have not experienced it personally.  A huge sense of loss and a huge sense of giving up and at the beginning of the film he’s in this pit of darkness and despair and living in a haze of booze and cigarette smoke.  And Miss Charley comes to begin to pull him out of his funk because at the end of the day that’s the bottom line that 9/11 happened.  The world didn’t stop and we all had to figure out a way to deal with it and move on.  Noah is from New York, born and raised and 9/11 was a huge deal for him and I think in a lot of ways this is his way of trying to deal with it.

CS:  In my notes I have that it doesn’t feel like a statement about 9/11 but just happens to be like a fact.  It’s not something that needs to have a spotlight shown on it.  It seems like it’s important to the character because that’s how he starts out.  That’s how we get to know him.  But it feels like something that has happened but nothing that needs any more context other than that.

SHANNON: There certainly isn’t any moralizing going on.  It’s not like lessons being taught.  It’s just about the people.  It’s about John and the other missing person.  The person I’m trying to find.  It’s about the decisions that they make.  It’s not, will I be able to love again or feel again.

CS:  It almost feels like, and not to be cliché about it, but he literally has nothing else to loose.  If any number of things could have been put in front of him to do that might have been slightly dangerous or some kind of thrill, he’s got to feel like there is nothing else there ““ just kind of numb to everything around him.  It’s interesting that he choose to couch this film sort of with a noir tinge and I can’t think of any recent films that want to try and marry the modern experience with noir but it fits right in.  How did he explain it to you?

SHANNON:  Noah didn’t explain much of anything to me.  I think a lot of times the contract between an actor and director is basically if you are able to mesh them and give them the confidence that you will show up at a reasonable facsimile in their imagination, which I think I did at the meeting, they don’t really get in your face too much when you’re working.  For me, a film noir is dark, black.  I can’t think of an even that would make more sense to marry film noir than 9/11.  It seems almost a childlike simplistic marriage.  So I wasn’t very conscious of trying to act in any particular style.  But, I’m sure a lot of it comes from the subconscious.  We all like to play and pretend and this detective is an art type in our collective consciousness.  I can’t name any person that I’m trying to copy or emulate but I know it’s all in there and when I put that suit on and stumble around I’m just playing at the same icon that other people have played before me.

shannon2CS:  But it’s not one we’ve seen in a long time.  At least if you were to open up the paper and look at the movie listings it’s not something that’s really in vogue to do.

SHANNON: I guess there’s a risk of it seeming dated ““ if people can see something coming I guess they are more likely to find it distasteful.  It’s a hard thing to pull off without seeming like you are weeping about it.  So I guess that’s why I didn’t want to go back and watch any of the classic movies because I didn’t want to go back and then show up imitating someone.  I wanted to show up and be there and react.

CS:  Was it a fluid process on the set?  This isn’t a Pearl Harbor, it wasn’t a mega production.  Is there an intimacy, to put it like that, when you are on a set this size that you don’t get on a major film set?

SHANNON: Oh yes.  It was very intimate.  What I enjoyed about it was that it was hard.  There were long days.  We shot the movie very quickly.  We typically would do a couple, maybe three, scenes a day.  I was always working.  I wasn’t sitting around much which I enjoy.  I think it helps the film.  It’s a better atmosphere.  More conducive to good acting than sitting around for hours and hours doing nothing.

CS:  I know that this question seems sort of far off field but looking to see how you got your start with Ground Hog Day and I lived in Illinois and actually visited the set when I was still in high school.  Just as an idea or a thought, Amy has been in the office and your roles as of late has been quite heavy and dramatic, any romantic comedies coming out of you any time soon?

SHANNON: I don’t know.  It’s a hard time in the business in general.  There’s not a lot of people making big risks right now.  I got real close on a James Brooks film actually.  I was in a callback and it went through my mind while l was auditioning that this would really surprise people.  This would be the thing that would dispel all these lines of thoughts that I’m some crazy guy.

(Laughs)

And I think because I had that thought consciously, it made me very nervous and wasn’t able to audition well enough to get the part.  So, it’s kind of like, I don’t know, maybe I need to go to a sport psychologist or something to fix the pitcher that can’t throw his curve ball anymore because he’s so worried about it getting knocked out of the park.

But, I don’t want to spend my whole life playing people that other people are scared of.  The thing is, John is a funny guy and a sweet guy.  He certainly ends up being sweet and funny with Miss Charley and he gets his stuff together in the end and stops drinking so I think it’s kind of uplifting in a way, this film.

CS:  It absolutely is and I know my time is done but it is a great film that showcases what you are really capable of doing and your whole body of work does that and I really do hope that it opens the eyes to some people who might see you now in a more kind light.

SHANNON: Thank you Chris, I really appreciate that.

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress