FRED Entertainment

July 18, 2010

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Dave Hill

Filed under: A Bit Of A Chat With Ken Plume,Interviews — Tags: , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 7:35 pm

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have a bit of a chat with writer/comedian/musician/legend Dave Hill

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Dave Hill“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-dave_hill.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

June 24, 2010

Trailer Park: Reed Cowan of 8: THE MORMON PROPOSITION

Filed under: Interviews,Trailer Park — Tags: , , , — admin @ 11:19 pm

By Christopher Stipp

The Archives, Right Here

Check out my other column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

Reed Cowan, Director of 8: The Mormon Proposition – Interview

fullsize8A movie like this is vitally important to the dialogue process.

There are certain things in this world where there is a definite understanding that it simply cannot last. When it came to discrimination at the turn of the last century it was fine to turn away people based on which country they came from, at the mid-century mark we thought there was nothing wrong with separating people based on the color of their skin, and even now there are people who think that discriminating against individuals based on their sexual orientation is OK. The fact that the two former facts are now seen a egregiously backward and a blemish on the face of the humanity we seem to embrace here in America is appalling when you consider that it’s still en vogue to base legislation and opposition to a normal, tax-paying segment of the population who want nothing more than to be joined in matrimony.

It’s equally appalling to think that some in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Mormons for those needing a shorthand, would mount a political attack to overturn California’s already sanctioned same-sex, constitutional right, to marry. Again, it was already a state supreme court decision and this one proposition changed everything.

Documentary filmmaker Reed Cowan, a former Mormon raised in the faith, looked deep into this issue and came out with a film that is at once informative and infuriating. Not enough people were out there to care last November, as the tumult this threatened to cause thousands didn’t stop this from passing but this film should serve as the first step in showing people that these gay men, gay women, are people, are human beings. We will look back at these kinds of egregious political acts as the behavior of cowards but it still remains to be seen how many more years we will have to wait until we accept everyone as equal. Until then, films like this need to be made in order to show that stupidity is still alive and well in this country.

8: The Mormon Proposition is now playing. Check the official site to see if it’s appearing near you.

CHRISTOPHER STIPP: Please let me get right down to the film itself. I was really interested, at least reading about the movie that this movie started out as sort of a documentary on the homeless gay teen issue in Utah and that this issue took on a life of its own. What was the flash point for you to say, “You know what? I think I’m making the wrong movie.”

club-jam-hosts-reed-cowan-and-the-mormon-proposition-posterCOWAN: I think it was the combination of “What’s the real problem here” and the real problem is bigotry spoken over the pulpit, right?

CS: Right.

COWAN: And so we felt that really made sense and so while we were in the production of the homeless angle we became consumed with Proposition 8. So we felt sort of like an historic imperative to back-off and reassess and put our cameras where they needed to be and that was Proposition 8 and that was a wild ride. Because the discovery that happened after that was so shocking to me. So shocking.

CS: And I think the movie’s main thrust, and certainly one of the things that comes up, is that it is a movie about trying to create dialogue than it is about trying to point a finger. Looking back at the experience of making the film do you think that true dialogue can still happen with the church?

COWAN: I believe it can happen and I believe it is happening. And I know that it’s happening in people’s homes all over California, especially. I know it’s happening all over the country where people are beginning to talk about what happened because I think Mormons share a part, and there are many, and are beginning to see that this is causing a division and with good Mormons that I know of who aren’t like that. They bristle at the thought that this would cause a division. I think there is a beautiful minority who are beginning to step forward and say, “We caused pain and we have to dissect it and vow to never let this happen again.”

CS: I was really impressed with the narration of [Oscar winning writer of Milk] Dustin Lance Black. As well as Steven Greenstreet, who did the wonderful documentary Killer At Large who I actually interviewed a couple of years ago. How did these people attach themselves to the picture? Obviously, it’s great that they did, but how did the become aware of it?

COWAN: Well, first of all, Dustin Lance Black”¦.I’m a journalist and I’m aware of a young girl in the Midwest who was doing her school project on Harvey Milk and her teachers would not allow her to bring that to class and, of course, that made the news. So, I contacted him on his Facebook page and asked if he would have any interest in talking to this girl because I think she would really be bolstered by you talking to her and he responded and out of that grew a friendship and he began to see the research and work I was doing on this film and when the time was right I asked him if he would participate and he interrupted filming on What’s Wrong With Virginia, he’s almost wrapped with it now, he interrupted production to narrate this film. So, that’s how that happened.

Steven Greenstreet came on the scene for me about halfway through my process. I had found online that he did a piece for AmericanNewsProject called Proposition 8 ““ Did Mormons Go Too Far? I contacted him and I purchased his footage, I purchased some of his documentation, and after we got into Sundance it was abundantly clear that we needed all hands on deck. So I brought Steven on as a producer and editor of the project and then by virtue of the hours he put into the film in the last few months of production I said I would give him co-director credit. So that was all I could do and that’s how it all evolved. It’s how all those relationships evolved and those relationships are indicative of many that came together to make this film. So many people all over the country.

prop-8-la-mormon-demo-cCS: And I think that one of the overriding things, at least I was thinking looking at my notes, was why did the church see something in California as an issue that they really wanted to try to get behind?

COWAN: Of course we know that as California goes, so goes the rest of the nation. And I think Mormons thought, “Oh God. Oh Heavenly Father. If gay marriage happens in California, it’s going to happen all over.” The Mormons in their call, as you saw in the movie said indeed we are compelled by our faith to speak out and I think that really is at the root of it all.

The Mormons think that the only way to achieve the highest level in heaven is to be baptized a Mormon, to be married man to woman in the Mormon temple, to progress to godhood on your own planet where men can marry multiple wives and make many multitudes of babies and inhabit their own planet and repeat the cycle. Mormons teach that man is what God once was and God is what man may become. And so the doctrine is “Look, man to woman, man to multiple woman, babies and gay people don’t fit into that picture.” I truly think that Mormons, I don’t think, I know from my own training that Mormons see gay people as an interruption in the grand scheme of heaven. And that has to be corrected or extinguished.

CS: And you’re no longer a Mormon, correct?

COWAN: I left the Mormon Church years ago. Ironically, not over this issue but I left the Mormon Church after my Mormon mission because I served the church in a country where there is a beautiful proud African American population and I could never get a straight answer from any of them as to why the Church I was knocking doors for didn’t allow full participation from African Americans until 1978. And finally if I couldn’t get an adequate explanation, I can’t put my name on it and I won’t.

CS: There was a mother couldn’t witness her own child being married in a temple here across town because she, herself, was not Mormon. The boy went to the process of being one but she had to actually wait for them to leave the temple and celebrate outside. It seems like such a harsh thing to have happened. Is this just a religion that is like like any other religions or is there something more deeply seeded that it makes you want to come back and say, “What is really going on in that church?”

COWAN: As to that Mormons believe that the ceremony that literally binds and seals a husband to a wife for time and eternity is one of the most sacred ceremonies that is performed in their tradition. And only those who are Mormon who pay 10% of their income to the Mormon Church, who keep the moral code, who keep the physical code or not drinking, smoking, drugs, coffee, tea, only those who keep the highest strictest moral codes, financial codes, can go into the temple to witness that.

My own grandmother who passed away a year and a half ago was an angel. Truly, one of the finest people I have ever known in my life and was not a Mormon and had to sit out at my sisters wedding. And what I found ironic was that was the last time I went into a temple because I had to leave my Grandma parked on the curb to go watch my sister get married. And all the while my aunts and uncles could go up and I looked around the room and saw in their marriages that perhaps there were some dishonest business practices going on in their lives but they were allowed to go in and witness this marriage. And my own Grandma who lived a simple, beautiful, pure life was not. And that is a sting for most people but people have to understand from the outside that Mormons believe they are the one and only true religion on the face of the earth that you cannot go to the highest level of heaven unless you are baptized Mormon and marry in the Mormon Temple.

And, there are strict hurdles to go over in order to achieve all those benchmarks in Mormon life and their objective is to convert everyone whether they are alive or dead. You don’t get into a temple easily and that’s just how it is.

2010-01-13-prop81CS: In the movie as well, at what point, again it started out as a project on the homeless gay teen population in Utah, at one point did you see that activism involves more than just holding a sign or saying something out loud, that it actually involves getting involved and doing things?

COWAN: Well, as a former Mormon who went through those very sacred, secret temple ceremonies, I know what the secret handshakes are and I know what the language is and in the Temple you make promises, the Mormons call them covenants to God, upon which you entire, eternal salvation and the salvation of your children is based. And they use covenant language. And in the film we show, which is the answer to your question, I know that it was big. It was bigger than just a call to arms and it was a holy war and that when Mormons use that sacred language of the Mormon Temple. Means and time.

In the Mormon Temple you covenant to dedicate your means and time to the church. So when Mormons heard the call from their leadership in Salt Lake ““ use those trigger words, it turned simple activism or advocacy into a holy war against gay people. Because everything is out the window at that point their own adherence to their own covenant, to their own promise is in that temple were on the line. And I would imagine many Mormons went home and thought in the privacy of their bedrooms said to their wives and husbands, “My gosh, they used the words means and time and we made these covenants and not only should get involved, but we must if we value the salvation of our entire family.”

Serious, serious stuff to Mormons.

CS: And at what point do you see an end game from the stance that 50 years ago we’d be talking about the white and black population ““ the issues of racism now that we look back on it now and say, “Oh my God, there was a drinking fountain that said for Whites Only, for Blacks Only…” Do you have it in your head about what has to happen before we look at this and go, “What were we wasting our lives doing?”

mormonCOWAN: I believe in a population that can get “when we know better, we can do better.” I always talk about he civil rights struggle and how at one point people had televisions and on the television they saw the police use night sticks on African American brothers and sisters and they saw the fire cannons and saw the fire hoses turned on these people and saw how inhumane that was. And they saw the beam that bigotry leveled on people and their families and I really think that’s why our film is important.

I do believe the arc of history bends towards justice and I do believe that people will see what happened and they will choose better. I really believe that. And I was on the radio recently with a man from California, a very successful man from California who happens to be an active Mormon and he said no longer are Mormons appealing to educated people, we’re appealing to uneducated people land people and people of different segments of the population, we’re not appealing to the young people anymore. To me, eventually the Mormons are going to have to see that if they are going to survive by way of numbers, they are going to have to be a more inclusive organization and they are going to have to teach their people to be more inclusive with gay people.

CS: Well, Reed, I know our time is short and I have just one more question to ask you and that is that now that this is done and you’ve seen the response its gotten, where are you emotionally, mentally, about moving forward in your own personal space? Are you hopeful for what’s around the corner? I realize this is a big blow to everyone when this was defeated but how are you going forward now that you made this film?

COWAN: I adopted two little boys a year ago on Thursday and my personal space is defined by them and I am as motivated and as hopeful as you can ever be when you look into the eyes of two little twin boys who deserve to be raised in a relationship where their parents enjoy the full benefits and protections, rights, privileges, blessings, of full marriage equality. I am very hopeful and I am very determined and very passionate that before I draw my last breath my children will be able to say that the family they were raised in was seen as important and as crucial to society as their peers and that’s where my hope lies.

June 22, 2010

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & John Moe

Filed under: A Bit Of A Chat With Ken Plume,Interviews — Tags: , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 3:26 am

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have a bit of a chat with writer, broadcaster, humorist, and Twitter gadfly, John Moe

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & John Moe“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-john_moe.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

June 18, 2010

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Nat Saunders

Filed under: A Bit Of A Chat With Ken Plume,Interviews — Tags: , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 3:43 am

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have a bit of a chat with writer, musician, co-creator of Misery Bear, and angry man in kitchen, Nat Saunders

You can visit his official site at www.wormhotel.co.uk, and pick up his album at www.airport85.co.uk.

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Nat Saunders“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-nat_saunders.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

June 10, 2010

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Doc Hammer: Part 2

Filed under: A Bit Of A Chat With Ken Plume,Interviews — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 3:28 am

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have the second of a two-part chat featuring THE VENTURE BROS’ own Doc Hammer…

Oh yeah, and be sure to pick up his band’s new album, WORN THIN.

hammeralbum.png

Hope you enjoy…

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN TO PART 1

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Doc Hammer: Part 2“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-doc_hammer_pt2.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

June 5, 2010

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Doc Hammer: Part 1

Filed under: A Bit Of A Chat With Ken Plume,Interviews — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 3:54 am

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have the first of a two-part chat featuring THE VENTURE BROS’ own Doc Hammer…

Oh yeah, and be sure to pick up his band’s new album, WORN THIN.

hammeralbum.png

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Doc Hammer: Part 1“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-doc_hammer_pt1.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

May 26, 2010

Interview: Anthony Del Col

Filed under: Interviews — Tags: , , , , — Aaron @ 4:48 pm

soapbox-header.png

Kill Shakespeare Interview: Anthony Del Col

lucyline.gif

killshakespeareissue1Meet Anthony Del Col, writer & co-creator of Kill Shakespeare, a new comic from IDW which has been featured at Toronto Wizard Con, Comic Con and Wonder Con in San Francisco.

Kill Shakespeare is a daring new comic which follows Shakespeare’s most loved characters on a quest to kill a reclusive wizard… William Shakespeare himself. To view the official IDW trailer for Kill Shakespeare, click here. Follow these links for previews of Issue #1 and Issue #2.

Can you tell me a little about yourself and the team behind Kill Shakespeare? I understand you are the Shakespeare geek of the bunch.

It’s funny that I’ve been labeled the ‘Shakespeare geek’ while Conor is the ‘comic geek’ because we both trade off at various times (at this precise moment Conor is reading ‘Richard III’ while I’m going through the latest ‘Fables’ adventures). Conor and I both enter this project with various experiences in the business and media worlds: myself as the producer of some indie films, a music manager and entrepreneur; Conor as a writer, producer and journalist. We work well because of these various backgrounds and our ability to trade off when necessary ““ we both balance the creative and the business at various points.

Was it a challenge to combine your very diverse skill set?

Well, we have to play rock-paper-scissors to make some decisions when there’s a stalemate… Seriously, though, there hasn’t been much of a challenge at all. Our strong partnership comes from a shared story sensibility ““ we both like similar films, books, games, etc. And as mentioned above, we have the ability to trade off on the various aspects of our venture, between the creative and the business. It’s an incredibly challenging and time-consuming endeavor to create, release and market a comic book series like this and it makes it a hell of a lot easier when you have a co-pilot.

In a recent article featured on Bleeding Cool, graphic novelist and Shakespeare expert Kimberly Cox gives a fairly scathing review of the first issue of KILL SHAKESPEARE. How do you respond to her claims that these days everyone hates Shakespeare?

Methinks she doth protest too much… Ms. Cox may have been exaggerating this point but it was still well made… The general perception is that most people hate Shakespeare. This is not true. Most people are not fans of the way that Shakespeare is taught these days. However, when taught or presented properly (as a kinetic, entertaining story) the Bard’s work can come alive and speak to everyone. As we’ve been talking to people over the last year about this project we’re amazed by how many fans of the Bard there are ““ from all walks of life, and all demographics. We’d love the opportunity to bring some of these people together as a community with this project.

How do you think academia as a whole will respond to these comics?

For the most part academics LOVE this project. We’ve heard from librarians, academics and teachers that they see this as a great gateway into the world of Shakespeare ““ a unique way of introducing him to a new generation and set of audiences. However, there have been some purists (such as Ms. Cox) who object to this. That’s okay ““ we delight in the discussion and feel that ol’ Shakey himself would embrace this project (though would be upset that we beat him to the punch).

Was it your aim to make William Shakespeare’s works more accessible through these comics or will it just a positive side effect if they do?

Our top priority at all times is to create an entertaining story. If we don’t do this then we’ve failed completely. However, our second goal is indeed to make the Bard accessible. We want this project to speak to audiences that shudder at the thought of being forced to read or watch Shakespeare ““ whether it’s a fifteen-year-old boy in class forced to study Romeo & Juliet or a fifty-year-old woman who has never had the time.

You and the other Kill Shakespeare creators have often talked of the emerging literary mashup genre (such as Bill Willingham’s Fables) as a source of inspiration. What is it about this genre that has so intrigued you?

It’s the possibility of the “what if” question… What if a character that you’ve read about, analyzed and loved suddenly found him/herself in a new scenario? Or found themselves in the same world as another classic character? What would happen in these scenarios? I’m really intrigued by taking well-known characters (such as the Bard’s) and placing them into a new world and having them come alive to new and unique audiences.

connorandyanthony

The Kill Shakespeare Creative Team (L to R) : Conor McCreery, Andy Belanger, Anthony Del Col.

In terms of comics, your debut issue was fantastic in each and every regard. Can you tell us a little bit about the process involved in making Kill Shakespeare happen?

Glad to hear that you liked it! We first came up with the idea six years ago in a brainstorming exercise but after developing it for a while we had to shelve it because Conor and I became busy with some other projects/activities. It was about two years ago when we decided that our story was best served in the comics medium that it started to take flight… We then went out and raised some private money to fund the project, brought IDW Publishing on board, and now our project is really starting to take flight…

I understand the first issue of Kill Shakespeare took 16 drafts to get right. How difficult was it to incorporate such dense reading material into a comic book?

Conor and I actually made a conscious decision to NOT re-read the plays line-by-line because we wanted a fresh take on the characters and their stories. We also did not want to become too caught up in the minute details of each play. We’re trying to write the comics to work on two levels ““ the first level is a straight entertaining tale that everyone can enjoy, whether you’ve studied the plays or not. The second level is to put in little references and Easter Eggs that Shakespeare devotees can appreciate and sink their teeth into (such as naming a brothel that Falstaff takes Hamlet to as ‘The Merry Wives of Windsor’).

How much did you experiment with the mix of modern and Shakespearian language?

Well, we’re getting really good at writing “thee” and “thou”… We made a decision early on that we wanted to go the modern-language route with this project and we haven’t looked back. I know that some Shakespeare scholars (such as Ms. Cox) have blasted us for this decision, but it worked well for Tom Stoppard (Shakespeare in Love, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead), did it not? The element that most makes Shakespeare’s plays inaccessible today is the language ““ don’t get me wrong, it’s beautiful and poetic, but it was written four hundred years ago and is often tough to understand.

Is there anything you can tell us about where this project is going after the initial run of 12 issues?

Fishing for spoilers, are you now?… If the positive reaction continues like it has, Conor and I have a lot of ideas for future installments of our story. We have a trilogy mapped out in our heads which will really dazzle readers and put the characters in some really interesting scenarios. There have been so many characters that we wanted to put into this first series but couldn’t find the room. We’d love to grow out our universe and ’cause there are so many things we’d love to do.

Your co-writer, Connor McCreery said in an interview with Wired.com that if Shakespeare were alive today, he would be J.J Abrams. Is it safe to assume that Kill Shakespeare will keep us guessing until the last minute?

Seeing as how this is the final question in the interview, should I actually answer this, or continue to keep you guessing until the next one?…

Guessing it is! Thank you Anthony for taking the time out of your busy schedule to chat with me.

To order your copy of Kill Shakespeare, click here.

Follow Kill Shakespeare on Facebook or visit the official site.

Mary Hoffman

May 25, 2010

Douglas Adams Tribute

tvornottv2.jpg

Assembled ~4/2005

adamsThat he was born is just one of the many undeniable facts about the life of the late Douglas Adams – author, humorist, raconteur, speaker, and thinker (although it should be noted that, on at least one parallel Earth, Mr. Adams was born a spring-toed lemur with a predilection for grassy fields and the works of Byron – a poetic lemur whose work was not terribly springy).

Another fact which comes to mind is that, of the 7 novels he wrote in his all-too-brief lifetime, by far the most popular is The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy and its four sequels – which make for a fine trilogy if you’re somewhat numerically impaired. Please don’t take this as a slight against Adams’s other novels, featuring detective Dirk Gently (Dirk Gently’s Holistic Detective Agency and its sequel, The Long Dark Tea-Time of the Soul), as they are both fine pieces of writing, and should also be read. Your reading list should also include the spoof dictionaries he co-wrote with John Lloyd (The Meaning of Liff & The Deeper Meaning of Liff), as well as his book on endangered species, Last Chance to See (with Mark Carwardine).

Sadly, Douglas Adams passed away on May, 11 2001 in California, where he had spent decades trying to get Hollywood to comprehend (and realize) a big screen version of Hitchhiker’s. Thankfully, he left behind a legacy in print that will not soon be forgotten, as well as a few deadlines that are still pending.

On the eve of the release of the big screen version (Iteration? Interpretation? Desecration? You judge…), I asked a few of Douglas’s friends, colleagues, associates, and vague acquaintances (for the sake of balance, naturally) to provide an anecdote they feel best described the Douglas they knew.

As a poet once said, “My enemy is hopelessness, my ally honest doubt. The Answer is a Question that I never will find out…”

In all fairness, another poet once said, “Don’t you know how sweet and wonderful life could be?… So let’s get it on…”

lucyline.gif

TERRY JONES
(author, director, Python)

I was lucky enough to buy two tickets for the first ever screening of Abel Gance’s Napoleon in Kevin Brownlow’s restored version. I don’t know why I bought the tickets, because I’d never heard of either the film nor Abel Gance, however the idea of a five hour silent film with a final sequence that prefigured Cinerama with three screens interlocking sounded pretty intriguing.

However, when the day of the screening came (a Sunday), I had a hangover and so did my wife. She decided she didn’t feel up to sitting in the cinema watching a silent movie from 10.00am until 5.00pm. So I rang Michael Palin. He said he had a hangover and didn’t fancy the idea of sitting in the cinema watching a silent movie from 10.00am until 5.00pm. So I rang up Douglas. He said he had a hangover and didn’t fancy the idea of sitting in the cinema watching a silent movie from 10.00am until 5.00pm.

So I gave up, and decided that since I’d bought the tickets, hungover or not, I’d have to go on my own.

Just as I was leaving the house, however, the phone rang. It was Douglas. He said he’d been thinking about it, and the idea of sitting in the cinema watching a silent movie from 10.00am to 5.00pm sounded so dreadful that he just had to do it to see if it was as dreadful as it seemed.

So that’s what happened. Douglas and I met up, thinking we’d give the middle of the film a miss, but instead finding ourselves riveted and at each interval impatient to get back into the film. It was, in short, one of the cinematic events of my life.

But for me the interesting thing was Douglas’s fearless curiosity. He came precisely because it sounded like such a bad idea! That really was Douglas.

lucyline.gif

JOHN LLOYD
(producer, writer, co-author of The Meaning of Liff)

The Hitchhiker movie was almost 23 years in turnaround.

I spent September of 1982 with Douglas (and his then girlfriend, Jane) in Donna Summer’s beach-house in Malibu.

We were supposed to be writing a book called The Meaning of Liff, but Douglas spent much of the time in meetings with movie people, trying to find someone he could get on with.

One day he returned from one of these encounters distracted and bewildered. He had just met a grotesque caricature of the archetypal Hollywood producer – a squat, toad-like man with an enormous cigar.

This creature, so Douglas reported, had the following proposal:

“So Doug,’ he growled, ‘We’re gonna eat a little lunch, maybe take a few moments to go over the idea and the money – and then we’re gonna talk about what kinda animal ya like to sleep with…”

lucyline.gif

SUSAN SHERIDAN
(actress, “Trillian” in the Hitchhiker’s radio series)

I certainly admired Douglas, for his dedication to his causes, and his “‘off the wall” sense of humour.

“Goodbye and thanks for all the fish” was a stock phrase in our house for years!

But the concept that we are in or among not just one but many dimensions is just the most wonderful thought – and who knows, it might be true.

I suspect D thought so…

…and ruled by white mice… how brilliant is that?

And of course, memories of him rushing the scripts in at the last minute…no wonder we didn’t understand it half the time!

I envy the film cast having scripts in advance!

lucyline.gif

NEIL INNES
(singer/songwriter, Rutle, one of the many legitimate claimants to the title “7th Python”)

Douglas Adams and I share the distinction of being the only two people – other than the team themselves – ever to have put pen to paper with Monty Python. It was while I was writing with Graham Chapman that I first met him… he would regularly join us for “lunch” – very lively and jolly occasions, often the highlight of the day.

Somehow or other the idea was spawned that Douglas and I should write a musical together, and a couple of years later, no sense in rushing these things, he drove up to Suffolk for the weekend. The family and I had only just moved to the country and we literally lived up a riverbed that was also a road – most of the time. It was wild and the kids adored it.

Douglas arrived with his guitar and fashionable London shoes in a style aptly named “slip-on”. Wide-eyed, he got out of the car and began to enthuse about Nature and Being. As I escorted him across the lawn, the only way to the house at that time, his feet suddenly slid from under him and he did the best impression of an Oliver Hardy fall I have ever seen!

A big man in so many ways, I shall never forget the sight of Douglas lying flat on his back, precious guitar held safely aloft, still extolling the beauty of the English countryside.

lucyline.gif

GRAHAM CHAPMAN
(writer, author, ex-Python)

(Mr. Chapman could not be reached in time for deadline)

.
.
.
.

lucyline.gif

NEIL GAIMAN
(author)

I was working on Don’t Panic! and that day I was at Douglas’s brand new Islington house going through dusty filing cabinets, pulling out early drafts of the TV series scripts and notes and old fan mail and such.

Douglas himself was off doing the sort of things that Douglas did, like contemplating writing something for the Comic Relief Live programme booklet, and then having lugubriously contemplated, taking a bath. There was a sudden scurrying and commotion as a Douglasy sort of noise came from upstairs, followed by the arrival downstairs of Douglas’s stepmother. “He says there aren’t any towels in the bathroom and he’s in the bath. Where are the towels?” she asked, and Douglas’s assistant went off with her to locate the linen closet and find Douglas a towel.

I thought, of course. You have to be the kind of person who doesn’t know where his towel is to notice that the people who do are the truly cool people. And I was glad Douglas didn’t. And I went back to the filing cabinets.

lucyline.gif

DAVID LEARNER
(actor, stage and TV “Marvin, the Paranoid Android”)

Warm from the day. The sun exploded into the china clay pits in Carclaze. Twenty-five years on and they’re so close to the Eden project. The Douglas project? Jim Francis was propping up a model of the “Heart of Gold” on stones. Special effects? Yes, given the budget. None of your movie money here.

Way way back up the hill stood Simon (Jones), sweltering in his dressing gown. Mark (Wing-Davey), complaining for the thousandth time about the other. David (Dixon), the best dressed of all of us: Ford always had it easy. Sandra (Dickinson), actually Sandra wasn’t wearing an awful lot, sleek and cat-like in red. Me, bringing up the rear, in the suit. The suit and I had no relationship whatever. Previously Jim and Perry had taken the usual forty minutes to screw me into the thing, leaving just the top of my head sucking in the Carclaze air. Now it was on. Bad mood? I should say so.

Down there, Douglas and Alan. Mike with a megaphone. “Roll!”

We ambled down the track. Breakfast was a long time away. I was getting hungry. “Cut! That’s a wrap.”

Simon said, “Bollocks. I still had my sunglasses on. Do you think anyone noticed?” It was very Arthur Dent.

Douglas’s choice at last of where we were eating. Actually, he always chose what we ate. The Mevagissey fish restaurant was fantastic. His choices were blindingly accurate. Usually. “It’s called …..”

I daren’t say what it was called. It’s probably still going. “It’s forty miles away!” I said.

It mattered not a jot. We piled into the motors, headed out across the moor. Everyone trying to keep up with the Porsche and failing admirably. The sun had slid down the sky. Even Marvin would have sighed at its beauty.

What was wrong with the meal? Don’t know. The place had a superb reputation, the service was excellent; it just didn’t … gel. We were expecting to give it ten out of ten; heck it was expensive.

For the first time that night I heard Douglas tell the story of the railway café, the bloke, the biscuits, the other bloke opposite. You know that story: it’s in one of the books, somewhere, of course. It was the end of meal. We’d been listening to a brilliant story teller tell a brilliant story. A general sigh of appreciation, the warmth of the evening, the company, the pleasure at having created another piece of television history.

In a sweeping gesture, Douglas paid for everyone. That was his way.

lucyline.gif

CLIFF PINNOCK
(assistant floor manager, Hitchhiker’s TV series)

Towards the end of filming the TV version of the Guide, my wife and I adopted a homeless dog from the RSPCA.

He was thought to be an Irish Wolfhound crossed with a German Shepherd. He was gigantic, hairy and bore his oversized face and nose regally. They said he was about three years old.

He was an amazing dog; faithful, adventurous and completely fearless. He was able to escape from anywhere with amazing ingenuity and could be completely distracted whilst planning his next escapade.

He wrestled with enormous toys and, being extremely strong, would drag people along with him on a whim. At the same he would exhibit great naiveté and be surprised by the simplest of things. He was fearfully protective, but incurably curious.

He would disappear completely and we would search the streets and lanes for hours growing frantic with worry, sure that some terrible fate had befallen him. Then he would shoulder through the door, often followed by some amazing new friend who he had discovered on his travels.

Somehow we all laughed with him and not at him, because he allowed us to see the humour from his point of view, rather than clowning.

He was run over outside our house by an articulated lorry and died much too young.

We had named him Douglas and the parallels, for me, are inescapable….

lucyline.gif

MARK CARWARDINE
(Zoologist, Conservationist, Environmentalist, co-author Last Chance to See)

Both Douglas and I have very low boredom thresholds. We spent an inordinate amount of time talking about everything under the sun. Funnily enough, Douglas didn’t read much while we were travelling. I don’t think he could concentrate on something so different and far-removed from the situation in hand. But the first thing he did on getting back to civilization was to buy books and ready solidly for hours.

When we got back to Sydney after our visit to Komodo, he went to his hotel room and disappeared for an hour – shaving, showering etc. – and then went off to find a bookshop. He bought at least 20 books on an incredible variety of subjects and then went back to bed for three solid days and nights to read the whole lot in one sitting.

His other great thing on returning to civilization was the phone – he made loads of phone calls.

The thing about Douglas was that he thoroughly enjoyed roughing it and life in the wilds for a week or so, but then he pined for the comforts of civilization. Completely understandable, of course.

lucyline.gif

STEPHEN FRY
(author, actor, director, bon vivant)

Douglas and I, as the first two owners of Apple Macs in Europe, played for years (before the internet would have made it easier) like kids with train sets, swapping software and routines and programmes. No colour, no hard disks for some years: but damn it was fun.

Downstairs lurked Sue Freestone, DNA’s publisher, wishing that I would go away so that Douglas would get on with his latest novel. As a way of getting rid of me she offered me an advance for a book of my own.

So I went off and wrote one.

When I came back Douglas was no further forward with his. As is well known, he HATED writing.

He was a huge man: when he was in a house it rattled and you always knew he was there. He did the same to the earth. It doesn’t rattle any more now that he’s gone.

lucyline.gif

MICHAEL NESMITH
(singer/songwriter, producer, author, entrepreneur)

Douglas Adams could see connections between things, people, and ideas that ordinary people either never saw, or finally saw long after Douglas had seen it. It was a singular talent, intuitive to Douglas, and developed to a unique and extraordinary extent. As a result Douglas had many friends who never would have met each other were it not for him. Douglas himself was the hub. His ability to discern these unseen connections made him a friend to a remarkably broad array of very different people.

When I was a teenager I saw a cartoon by Paul Crum of two hippos in a remote jungle stream with just their nose above water. They were talking, and one was saying to the other “I keep thinking it’s Tuesday”.

The cartoon impressed me deeply. I thought the cartoon amazingly funny. It captured something special.

I listened in astonishment one afternoon as Douglas told a group of reporters of having seen that same cartoon when he was a teenager, and how much it had meant to him. Douglas and I had never mentioned it to each other before that moment, although we had been friends for ten years.

It didn’t surprise Douglas. For him it was the final appearing of something he had intuitively known since we first met. Fortunately for me Douglas offered his friendship based on that hunch, and I will always treasure it.

lucyline.gif

MARK WHEATON
(screenwriter)

When I met Douglas Adams – for the briefest of moments – I was a broke grad student at Indiana University who had most of his books memorized but only an aged, dog-earned Long Dark Tea-Time of the Soul amongst my possessions. I’d seen a small poster advertising a lecture being given by Adams at IU and went – book in hand hoping for an autograph – expecting a throng.

The lecture wasn’t exactly a sell-out, but for those of us who showed up, it was a truly great night. Adams came down off his podium when he noted the attendance, invited everyone to move up close, and started off by saying he would have to amend his typical Q&A as he always answered the question, “Where
do you get your ideas?” with: “A small mail-order company in Indiana.”

Though the lecture was mostly about the environment – somewhat in conjunction with the book Last Chance to See – Adams talked about the nature of humor, recalling a story about driving in the American Southwest and passing a sign reading: “Strong Winds May Exist.” He extrapolated on this for awhile, making eloquent use of his trademark humor, but then told us a story that, he explained, would have a funny set-up, but a horrifically disappointing ending. I won’t recall it anywhere near as well as Adams did, but it went something like this.

Adams was driving around London and ended up talking to a police officer/bobby – the kind that wore the large, pointy helmet. Anyway, he went off in his car, only to find himself soon chased by the police, people in the neighborhood, little kids, buses – you name it – everyone pursuing him. That’s when he realized that the bobby’s hat – the theft of which was an arrestable offense – was on top of his car.

So, he stopped and gave the helmet back.

He told the story brilliantly and everybody got a laugh. At the end of the evening, Adams signed autographs and chatted with fans. I got up to him and talked to him about radio-theater, something we agreed was a great way for a young writer to cut their teeth. He was curious about where they practiced it in America and we got on the topic of Austin, Texas – a place Adams thought was pretty nifty. And that was it. When I found out he had passed away, it was the first time the death of an author really made me feel truly regretful of what writing may have yet been still to come.

lucyline.gif

KEN BUSSANMAS
(writer)

I distinctly remember the first time I “met” Douglas Adams – I was 13 years old and had decided that I was going to write for Doctor Who. After several phone calls (a story unto themselves that will be recounted elsewhere), I was put through to the Doctor Who production office and turned over to its new Script Editor, one Douglas Adams.

Either I was far better at disguising my age over the phone than I believed possible or Douglas was so intrigued that an American would show any interest in writing for Doctor Who at the time to give it a second thought. Whatever reason he had for not hanging up the phone the instant I came on the line, it began a series of phone calls wherein we discussed pretty much anything that came to mind and very rarely the task at hand, which was writing stories for Doctor Who.

At the time, the US market was considerably behind the BBC and the series hadn’t yet taken off in America the way it would a few short years later. My first request was to ask Douglas for a copy of the Writer’s Guide for the series, the story bible that writers use as a framework for submissions.

There was a long pause.

“We haven’t got one”, he finally replied.

“That’s okay,” I said, “just get me the one for last season and I’ll go off of that one until the one for this season is ready.”

Yet another long pause and a deep breath followed.

“It’s not that we haven’t written one for this series, Ken,” he started off, almost sheepishly. “We’ve never had one. I’m really sorry about that and I know you must think we’re very unprofessional for that but I can try to work you up something to use.”

I couldn’t believe it – I had one of the people responsible for producing a series I was practically begging to write for apologize to me for not having a writer’s guide! I think he mistook my stunned silence as some kind of indictment of Doctor Who, the BBC and himself as a person. “I’ll make sure you’ve got something to work with by the end of the week,” he told me and he was good to his word. A remarkable accomplishment considering how legendary his inability to meet a deadline became in the years that followed.

The “writer’s guide” that appeared in my mailbox nearly two weeks later was three typewritten pages, each weighed down by at least a few ounces of Liquid Paper. Douglas, it seemed, would “edit on the fly” and the extra postage reflected the extra weight. It was hilarious, reflecting the personality of the man I’d been speaking with on the phone and almost completely useless for its intended purpose as it gave no directions whatsoever on characters or settings. Still, Douglas Adams had a great influence on my life and my career simply for being who he was and being gracious enough to give someone he didn’t know a chance.

lucyline.gif

KEVIN JON DAVIES
(Hitchhiker’s TV series animator, documentary maker, and concept artist of The Illustrated Hitchhiker’s)

During one studio session for the 1981 BBCTV series of The Hitchhiker’s Guide I sat with Douglas for a while behind the director, Alan J.W. Bell, up in the control gallery. Alan was speaking to his Floor Manager via the talk-back system as they diplomatically wrestled with an awkward actor who was holding up the proceedings. This guest star (who’d better remain nameless) had, frankly, been having trouble remembering his lines since the rehearsal period and his latest excuse was to blame his uncomfortable seating arrangements. Douglas fumed as his precious script was mangled yet again.

“Why doesn’t he just prop himself up a bit?” I murmured.

“Why doesn’t he just f*** off!” barked Douglas, loudly. The comment shot straight down the director’s microphone and out to every pair of headphones on the studio floor. I later learned that even those without headphones could hear the remark.

“Who said that?” demanded the rather compromised F.M., “Was it Kevin?”

(I don’t think he liked me…!)

Alan glanced round at Douglas and replied ruefully, “No, I’m afraid that was our writer…!” Douglas just grinned, unashamedly.

In January 1984 I attended a glittering ceremony where Douglas was to collect his first Golden Pan Award as the youngest author under 30 (apart from poor little Anne Frank) to sell a million copies in the Pan Paperback edition alone. His publisher, making the presentation, spoke at length about Douglas’s famous inability to meet deadlines. They used to wonder whether, come each delivery date, Douglas was actually at home finishing the latest novel or out somewhere wrapping another Porche around a lamppost (the fate which befell his first – within a fortnight). To rapturous applause, Douglas accepted his prize statuette and turned to the audience; “I’ve known about this evening’s presentation for sometime,” he grinned, “And I’m pleased to say my acceptance speech is very nearly ready!”

lucyline.gif

M.J. SIMPSON
(writer, author of Hitchhiker: A Biography of Douglas Adams)

I didn’t know Douglas Adams socially; I just met him professionally a few times. But when I did meet him I found him to be enthusiastic, amiable and polite. I think he was slightly bemused by being a ‘celebrity’. He used to worry that it wasn’t normal for writers to be recognizable, but at the same time he was a frustrated performer who loved giving readings and interviews. I always summed it up as: he didn’t really like ‘fans’ but he was always happy to talk with ‘a fan’.

I wrote a huge article about the history of Hitchhiker’s Guide in SFX magazine for the series’ 20th anniversary in 1998. The movie deal had just been announced and Douglas very kindly wrote a few paragraphs about it for the feature. No agents involved, no hassle, no fee – he was that approachable, although I’m sure he wrote the stuff for me in order to avoid having to write something else for someone else. Nevertheless, I take pride in being almost the only person on Earth to have commissioned some writing from Douglas Adams and received it before my deadline.

I think it is interesting, and a little sad, that Douglas’s name has been so low-key among all the publicity and hype for this movie. The trailers just said “From the celebrated best-selling novel” – but omitted to mention who wrote it. On the other hand, it may be best for Douglas Adams’s reputation that he isn’t linked too closely with the film. Despite what many people are saying, he didn’t write it. He wrote a screenplay which Disney rejected, then he died, and then another writer came in and wrote a new screenplay incorporating material from Douglas’s version. WGA rules mean that both writers are credited, though they never met.

A much better tribute to Douglas is the new, final radio series based on the fourth and fifth Hitchhiker books. The reason those books don’t work very well is because they were rushed so there is almost no editing. Douglas needed a good editor or producer to make his work really shine and what Dirk Maggs has done with these final eight scripts is extraordinary and exactly what an editor would have done with the books had there been time.

lucyline.gif

DIRK MAGGS
(Adapter/Director, The Hitchhiker’s Guide To The Galaxy Quandary & Quintessential Phases)

In the early 1990s I was, like Douglas Adams and Geoffrey Perkins before me, a Producer in BBC Radio Light Entertainment. As well as comedy programmes our output included ‘Light Drama’, and whilst making action serials featuring the DC Comics characters Superman and Batman I was able to develop a radio production style which layered lots of sound effects and music onto a tightly written, cinematic script. It was, and is, an incredibly labour intensive way to work, and at times I still wonder what rod I made for my own back. But these early efforts had caught Douglas’s attention, and he was in talks with the BBC about further radio series of Hitchhiker’s. One spring morning in 1993 he called my boss Jonathan James Moore and asked if I would be interested in taking on the job of producing them. I was floored. Apart from marriage and children, nothing before or since has so wonderfully and unexpectedly trumped my expectations of life.

That proposed first series ground to a halt due to script problems and contractual difficulties. Then talks I had with Douglas and Robbie Stamp in 1997 to restart the process through their Digital Village company were scuppered by the long-awaited Movie Deal coming through. When we last met, in Broadcasting House Reception in 2000, we were still making hopeful noises about finishing the saga on radio. And then, overwhelming any such petty concerns, Douglas died. Against all odds it was a chance meeting at his Memorial Service which revived the idea, and this time it actually happened.

I did not know Douglas as a friend, but on the occasions we met I liked him enormously, whether he was enthused, taciturn, distracted or utterly pissed off. I can only thank him for having faith in me, and recall a moment when perhaps I helped maintain his faith in himself. After the Tertiary Phase collapsed in 1993 I was ‘poached’ to produce Ned Sherrin’s Radio 4 chat show Loose Ends. Mostly Harmless had just been published in paperback and I invited Douglas in as a guest, as well as Sir Ranulph Fiennes, who had just manhauled a sled across Antarctica, losing useful items like fingers and toes to frostbite. As the great explorer told an epic tale of suffering and endurance, Douglas’s face fell.

Afterwards, in the pub, I asked if something had upset him.

“Oh, not really,” said Douglas. “It’s just that talking about being locked in a hotel room to write an overdue novel seems pretty tame stuff compared to trekking across a thousand miles of icy crevasses.”

“Well you need to put things in perspective,” I replied. “First of all, your struggle was on a more human scale, and the result is a unique achievement no-one can match. Secondly, just before we went on air, Ran Fiennes got lost in the basement of Broadcasting House looking for the toilet.”

Douglas smiled and picked up his glass. “That makes me feel much better.”

douglasaward.jpg

I want to thank everyone who shared their thoughts and anecdotes about Douglas, especially those who set aside crippling deadlines of their own to make sure this piece had their input. Of course, I could have gone through with my original plan – in honor of Douglas – and run this piece four months late…

-Ken Plume

May 23, 2010

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Phil Plait

Filed under: A Bit Of A Chat With Ken Plume,Interviews — Tags: , , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 10:37 pm

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have a bit of a chat with astronomer, writer, skeptic, and blogger behind Bad Astronomy, Phil Plait….

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Phil Plait“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-phil_plait.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

May 21, 2010

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Mike Phirman

Filed under: A Bit Of A Chat With Ken Plume,Interviews — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 4:16 am

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have a chat with one half of the musical comedy duo Hard ‘N Phirm – shortly after the debut of his solo album THE VERY LAST SONGS I WILL EVER RECORD (PART 1) – Mr. Mike Phirman

You can pick up his new album at www.MikePhirman.com

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Mike Phirman“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-mike_phirman.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

May 12, 2010

Interview: Charlie Craig

Filed under: Interviews — UncaScroogeMcD @ 4:58 pm

soapbox-header.png

craigThe real action on a television set doesn’t happen in front of the camera. Behind the scenes the show’s producers wear every possible hat – they pitch the pilot, write the scripts, hire actors, and oversee film editing. Over the years that job has become even more complex. As cable has broadened the creative possibilities and show topics are more niche, creators have had to expand their knowledge base.

Charlie Craig knows this better then anyone. He was a writer and supervising producer on The X-Files and, more recently, executive producer of Eureka, one of SyFy channel’s most highly rated shows. Today he spends his days writing pilots and pitches for new shows. Craig talked to Erin Biba about the balancing act of making a show from pitch to production.

lucyline.gif

ERIN BIBA: How many show ideas do you have to come up with before you get one on the air?

CRAIG: When I started doing this 25 years ago you came up with an idea and could go and pitch it to all the different studios and networks and one would like it. But now there are many more networks, which sounds good from a writer’s standpoint, but each one of those networks has an extremely particular set of criteria for what they want to put on the air. It’s narrowcasting.

I have a deal with Fox 21, which is a studio, to make pilots. Every idea is just good for one network and if they don’t like it I have to throw it out and come up with a new idea. It’s become much more difficult. You’d think with all these networks you’ve got it made.

When I started in 1985 Kate & Allie was the only half hour comedy in the top 20 and there were only basically three networks. When you came up with an idea your agent got excited and said: “Let’s go pitch to the three networks on Friday and one of them will outbid the other.”

Flash forward to today and there are more networks then I can count and even networks you don’t think are in the live action business are starting to get into it like Cartoon Network. To succeed and realize some level of potential each network has had to carve up the spectrum of public interest into a particular slice.

BIBA: So, realistically, you have to come up with a lot more then one idea.

CRAIG: Right. I have to say: who’s the idea for and does it appeal to enough people that I’m not limiting myself to a niche? It’s no longer good enough to just have an interesting idea for a television show. That is the starting place. Now it has to be: that’s interesting but what niches can it go into? My work has quadrupled. It’s not just about a good idea.

Now I have to come up with 8 new ideas every year and that’s a lot work.

You hope to find something that sparks you and run it by your agent and hope he doesn’t say: “They tried that a CBS and it didn’t work out. Everything on TV is already like that and ratings aren’t very good.” The hardest thing is not psyching yourself out. There’s a five-minute lag after coming up with something when your brain starts to generate ideas about why it’s not good

With the incredible number of networks there’s a greater sense of frenzy. There’s a bit of a frantic nature now — pitching a show is much more complex and much more hurried than it used to be.

BIBA: Do you worry that your show concepts aren’t as good because you’ve had to significantly increase the volume of what you’re putting out?

All good ideas become diluted because that’s the process of television. Honestly, some of the best work I’ve done has been when somebody threw an idea at me and said: “If you can do this in a week we’ll put it on the air.” There is no safety net, you can’t fail because everyone else already has, and in this amount of time who would expect me to succeed anyway? Whatever I come up with will be fresh and accessible. That frees your mind. Some of the best stuff I’ve done has come from that need for speed.

BIBA: But that speed isn’t relegated to the moments when you were asked to save something at the last minute. Isn’t working fast the key factor on any television set?

CRAIG: When I’m running a TV show it’s always about hustle. There’s no time to go back home and think about things. When you’re writing, running, and producing a show you have ten minutes to come up with the best possible solution and implement it. Pressure makes diamonds. I learned that in the ’80s on TV shows. If you’re good, when you’re forced to suck it up and do it, you get it accomplished.

BIBA: So what, exactly, is happening on the set that pulls you in so many directions?

CRAIG: In TV you’re sitting in an office coming up with idea. Meanwhile, people are shooting nine pages of your script. It’s all about the calendar. For example: They’re shooting episode two right now and we haven’t written episode four. It preps in two days. If we don’t have something ready it will cost $100,000. Then you have to cast the episode you’ve already written, go in to post and edit episodes which are about to start airing. All the while your sitting around creatively saying: “We’ve got ten more episodes we have to come up with.”

The downside of that is often you write a script a couple weeks before it shoots and then you get notes, things change, and tomorrow you’re shooting something you rewrote today, which doesn’t have the polish but time’s up. That’s a big reason why a lot of television is good but not great. You end up making decisions at the last minute that have lasting impact.

BIBA: Sounds exhausting.

CRAIG: It’s a real balancing act. That’s what everyday is like running a show. At least you come home at the ending of it saying: “Not sure what I accomplished, but we didn’t shut down, and no one fired me.” But if you’re good at it you enjoy it. There’s something about coming home and knowing I had to make 25 decisions and because 20 of them were good I’m good at what I do. The sheer volume causes you to feel like you have lived up to your title as a producer.

Follow author Erin Biba on Twitter: @ErinBiba

April 26, 2010

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Stan Lee

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have a chat with master storyteller (and living legend, natch) Stan Lee….

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Stan Lee“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-stan_lee.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Joel Hodgson

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have a chat with the creator of MYSTERY SCIENCE THEATER 3000 (and one-fifth of Cinematic Titanic team), Joel Hodgson….

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Joel Hodgson“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-joel_hodgson.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Joe Randazzo

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have a chat with the Editor of THE ONION, Joe Randazzo

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Joe Randazzo“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-joe_randazzo.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

April 22, 2010

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Al Campbell

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, Ken Plume has a chat with the Screenwipe/Newswipe/Gameswipe, Happy Finish, and Funny Or Die director, Al Campbell

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Al Campbell“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-al_campbell.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

April 13, 2010

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Rob Delaney

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, Ken has a bit of a chat with writer/comedian Rob Delaney

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Rob Delaney“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-rob_delaney.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

April 10, 2010

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & James Urbaniak 2

Filed under: A Bit Of A Chat With Ken Plume,Interviews — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 2:30 am

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have another chat with the actor behind THE VENTURE BROS’ own Dr. Thaddeus “Rusty” Venture and AMERICAN SPLENDOR’s Robert Crumb, who’s also a bit of a net bon vivant/commentator, James Urbaniak

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & James Urbaniak 2“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-james_urbaniak_2.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

April 9, 2010

Trailer Park: Ray Manzarek of The Doors and Tom DiCillo, Director of WHEN YOU’RE STRANGE

By Christopher Stipp

The Archives, Right Here
Check out my new column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

YOUSSOU N’DOUR: I BRING WHAT I LOVE – DVD Review

youssou_posterThis has been a wild couple of weeks with the number of documentaries I’ve been watching about musicians as of late.

From a couple of Blu-ray releases of live concerts, a movie about the Doors, and now this, it has been a whirlwind of performances that showcase music of all kinds. The thing about YOUSSOU N’DOUR: I BRING WHAT I LOVE is that I was not expecting to like it as much as I did. Ballasted by the fact that this movie has come out under the Oscilloscope Laboratory banner, becoming required viewing simply because it has so far had an unbeaten track record of films that have a unique way of telling a story, I quite didn’t know what to expect other than this was going to be a movie about music. It’s much more that, however, as I found out.

Youssou is a musician that many know but probably didn’t realize. Heck, I didn’t realize. He’s the chanting voice you hear in the song In Your Eyes by Peter Gabriel. A man who embraced music from all over the world, Gabriel help push Youssou into greater prominence among those within the industry. It was shocking to see that as a Senegalese pop star he received worldwide acclaim for his music and recognition for it as well all the while I was blissfully unaware of this man for decades.

This movie goes beyond just capturing Youssou’s time on the road, and we get many live performances in venues all over the globe, but it charts the time when he had to deal with an album he made called Egypt, a record that was deemed incendiary because of its content. Not that it had blasphemous, dirty language but it contained his own thoughts and feelings about a religion and faith not many were too keen on learning more about in 2004: Islam. This movie captures his feelings on the matter and it’s rather gripping and forces you to reflect about what it would be like for anyone to believe something so fervently and want to share that joy with the world only to have your native land, here Senegal, turn away. Heartbreaking and sad, Youssou’s determination and love comes though in one the films that I have been able to watch about musicians which doesn’t make me think that all the world’s musicians are in it for themselves. Youssou genuinely seems passionate about the things he’s been allowed to do and to share with the rest of the world and you simply do not see that in today’s crop of entertainers.

Wholly refreshing, wonderful to look at, director Elizabeth Chai Vasarhelyi’s film captures the essence of Youssou’s music that you can feel come through the screen. I had never heard of the man before seeing this film but I was a fan by the end and I think that’s the point of any good movie like this. You don’t necessarily have to be enthralled by the music but you cannot help but to be in awe of one man’s perseverance to be the best man he can be in the face of so many who would try and change that course.

If you have a chance to rent it or buy it you could not do yourself a better favor than picking this title up and seeing some music come alive.

Synopsis

YOUSSOU N’DOUR: I BRING WHAT I LOVE is a gorgeously photographed, music infused cinematic portrait of world famous Senegalese pop sensation Youssou N’Dour. Best known in the West for his collaborations with Bono and Peter Gabriel, N’Dour is one of the most beloved musicians in pop music and his legendary career has spanned decades.

In 2004, responding to negative perceptions about his Muslim faith, N’Dour recorded EGYPT, a deeply spiritual album dedicated to a more tolerant view of Islam. In a critical and career-defining moment, the album was awarded the 2004 Grammy® for BEST WORLD MUSIC ALBUM. While Western audiences embraced N’Dour’s brave musical message, it encountered a serious religious backlash in his native country of Senegal where N’Dour is considered a national hero. Local critics and the media accused him of insulting Islam, arguing that pop and religious music should not mix.

Combining unprecedented images of Senegal’s most sacred Muslim rituals, vibrant concert performances filmed around the world, and intimate access to N’Dour and his family, I BRING WHAT I LOVE chronicles the difficult path this remarkable artist must take. It is a stirring journey of faith, redemption, and the power of music to overcome intolerance.

Tom DiCillo – Interview

The documentary is endlessly fascinating, let’s get that right out of the way.

Using footage from Jim Morrison’s own film HWY: An American Pastoral from 1969 the new Doors documentary When You’re Strange also uses footage never before seen of the band that ignited a generation. For any fan who thinks that Oliver Stone made the definitive Doors movie this doc sheds some light on the figure that is Jim Morrison the legend and dispels the ideas that he walked around in a constant drug-fueled stupor. In fact, this film shows Morrison as a rather humorous individual capable of so much more than just being a part of a cliche.

Using footage never before seen and utilizing Johnny Depp’s silken vocals to narrate the story of how the band came together to take over a nation, then the world, you get a new perspective on a band that most feel like they already figured out. It’s endlessly fascinating from a documentary perspective, like reading years of biographies on one person only to find their autobiography and putting the two together. Comparative literature it is not but there is a story here that you have to open yourself to in order to wade beyond all that you already think you know. When You’re Strange is a brisk foray into a brief period of time when music could rattle a population of listeners and a glimpse into a band that never sold their rights to have their music played in a car commercial. And they never will.

WHEN YOU’RE STRANGE opens today

when_youre_strange-posterCHRISTOPHER STIPP: Hey, Tom. How are you doing?

TOM DICILLO: I’m good man. How are you?

CS: Doing fine. Hopefully this hasn’t been a long press day for you.

DICILLO: Well, it has been but it’s been really enjoyable because people are really digging this film and that’s just exciting to see.

CS: I really dug it.

DICILLO: Good.

CS: I did a search for Doors films or documentaries and I was floor by the lack of them out there. Did you immediately look at this project and immediately jump on it?

DICILLO: Well, the project was presented to me as a possibility and then I was asked if I wanted to direct it. And I said yes immediately without question. I didn’t know what I was getting into. In fact, I hadn’t seen any of the footage. After I said yes, then they began the process of them showing me stuff and asking me to come up with the concept. I just think it was the right timing. They had been trying to make something with this footage for sometime and I don’t know, I think perhaps they just didn’t have the right combination of people. And, something about my idea about only using this original footage just freaks them out and just freaked The Doors out too. They said, “How can you make a film about the Doors in which we don’t have The Doors talking?” I said, “Because I think if you look at this footage it’s so astonishing that it will ultimately be better.” When they saw the first half hour I put together, they were floored. Let’s just thank the Lord”¦not the Lord, because there is no Lord”¦

(Laughs)

Thanks to whoever that it worked out and all came together.

CS: I’m interested to get your take ““ as a filmmaker ““ you’ve done feature film, you’ve done television, was there a learning curve as a documentarian when you had to sift through this info and try to create a narrative?

DICILLO: Oh, absolutely. Are you kidding? Very good question, man. My experience is with writing and directing and working that way. Creating every image and then choosing the best image and then editing it. This one ““ I had to go, “OK, here’s the footage, here are the dailies from the film”¦What can I do with it?”

Certain things hit me immediately.

I didn’t know that this footage of Morrison walking through the desert was from his own film HWY. I just thought they were random shots of Jim walking through the desert. So I felt free to use them. I knew that they were going to go in the film and I knew they were going to be kind of a framing device immediately. Almost like, there’s a shot of him getting out of a car stuck in the sand. I said, “That’s going to be Morrison.”

It’s the spirit of Morrison ““ re-emerging, so to speak.

But then I had a whole story to tell and your probably could make six stories about The Doors, they did so much in that short period of time. In some cases, the footage helps me. It was easy to do it because I had great images. In other cases, I had to do a little bit of explaining or somehow bridging gaps in things. And the narration became critical and I realized immediately that the narration was going to have to sustain this film. It was going to have to pull it together and I think Johnny Depp brings such an amazing intimacy and sense of belief in things he’s saying that he becomes almost as a fifth character in the film.

CS: Right. And he does. I was read in a previous interview with Ray [Manzarek] who said that Oliver Stone got it wrong when he made The Doors. That he wasn’t that drunken, wacked out of his skull 24/7 kind of guy people saw in that film. Do you think you saw a picture of the real Morrison as you went through this footage?

DICILLO: I saw several pictures of the real Morrison. That’s what I wanted to do, was to not limit the ones that I saw. I think that Stone’s movie limited severely the dimension of what Morrison was. I really do. And I’m not disrespecting Oliver Stone but saying he probably gave a thumbnail, a fingernail of what this guy really was. He was an immensely complicated guy. Immensely complicated. At times he was, yes, the drunken ass that was just pissing in his pants in the middle of a recording session. And then I had this footage of him dancing in the sand in the middle of the desert with complete strangers, these kids and the look on his face, it’s absolutely convincing that he’s enjoying the hell out of himself and that he’s really there, dancing with those kids. That’s as much a part of his character as the other stuff, and I wanted to try and show that.

You know what? I just feel there was something deeply compelling about him and that, for me, it wasn’t just the drinking, it wasn’t the excesses, it was the more personal things. Because if you talk to any of these guys, they’ll tell you the same thing. He was immensely articulate. He enjoyed life. I don’t think he had a death-wish. I don’t think so at all. I think he just got caught up in something and could not get out of it.

when-youCS: And I think he comes off ““ I was surprised to see he was quite erudite and scholarly as a young man ““ completely different than public perception of what people “thought” he was.

DICILLO: Yeah. It’s pretty phenomenal that at 16 he was reading Nietzsche and Kerouac and this was before he even took acid. He was an intensely intelligent man and I think to only show one aspect of his character does him a huge disservice. And also, the same for the rest of the band members. They were hugely involved in the creation and development of the band. All of them. And each one was critical to the band and all of them amazing musicians. That’s what I wanted to show. I wanted to go from the more basic sort of misunderstanding that a lot of people wrote Light My Fire. Well, I wanted to clear that up and say well, “No, he didn’t.” Actually, it was Robby Krieger.

CS: I was shocked to see that was the first one out of the box as a writer and it gets the guy a number one slot on the charts.

DICILLO: Isn’t that amazing? It’s just astonishing. And then he had a number of other number ones.

There’s a lot there that you can appreciate that you don’t have to build up a myth about, do you know what I mean? And I wanted to try to create a new myth but one based on reality.

CS: Do you think it was important to know the band deeply before working on this? Did you pour yourself into the mythos, what people had to say, or did you intentionally go in there blind and create something from what you had?

DICILLO: I went in blind but I did a lot of research. I had to be careful though to avoid simply paraphrasing what other people had said. I didn’t want to do that. A lot has been written about this band, some of it really amazing, intuitive. Some of it is conjecture and some of it bullshit. I just said, “Listen, I’ve got to try to find something new for myself, something new for myself to drive me through this entire process.”

That’s all you can do as a filmmaker is to have such a belief in the subject that it pulls you through every single agonizing moment of nightmare and terror when you feel like it’s all meaningless. And for me that was showing them as they were. Just letting the material speak and allowing the audience to experience the band as if they were alive in 1966 and they happen to walk in and here’s a new band called The Doors.

That was the thing that kept me going.

And I talked to the band members and I read the books of Ray and Don and I talked to a lot of people and essentially decided I would only try to use stuff that had been collaborated ““ stuff that would be true ““ as far as people knew.

Ray Manzarek – Interview

I don’t own any Doors albums.

when_you_re_strange_movie_image_the_doors_jim_morrison__1_CHRISTOPHER STIPP: Ray, I don’t know if I should start out with Your Highness, Your Holiness, I don’t know which one you would prefer”¦

MANZAREK: Your Obsequiousness. That’s what you should call me.

(Laughs)

CHRISTOPHER STIPP: Well, I’ve got so many questions and only a few minutes.

MANZAREK: You don’t have that much time so you can’t have sooo many!

(Laughs)

“I’ve got quite a few questions for you””¦OK, go ahead, dude!

(Laughs)

CS: I want to start kind of lighthearted but getting ready to talk to you I was reminded about William Shatner’s Saturday Night Live sketch where he tells people to grow up or get a life and find something else to talk about with regard to fanatical nature of the fans who obsessed over Star Trek. Are The Doors like that for you in that, yes, it was a part of your life but you’ve gone on and accomplished other artistic things. Is this something you really love talking about again, and again, and again?

MANZAREK: Absolutely, because it was The Doors. You know what, if I don’t talk about The Doors how can I thankfully work in the word psychedelic into our conversation?

(Laughs)

And I can if I talk about The Doors and I can talk about The Doors, I can talk about opening the doors of perception and if I talk about opening the doors of perception I can talk about psychedelic substances to wit, LSD.

CS: Exactly

MANZAREK: So, it’s a great opportunity to bring the message of psychedelics to the 21st century.

CS: Please. School me on something. I was reading previous interviews with you and I was absolutely amazed, as you just mentioned, the psychedelic, the opening of one’s mind. And how the current crop of what we call musicians that flail themselves around on purpose, have no real similarity to what Jim was. I was at fault when I thought it was just Jim flopping around when it was really him internalizing the music. Can you talk a little bit about the misconception about Jim vs. what other people are aping?

MANZAREK: It’s hard for me to talk about yours or the people’s misconceptions because I don’t know what the hell they’re thinking about. I know what I’m thinking when I’m making music with Jim Morrison is entering the ineffable oneness, the zen, peace and time. That’s what you do as a musician. You surrender yourself to all that goes into creating a song and you give up your ego and you become one with the music, the chord changes, the rhythm, the lyrics, the beat, all that stuff.

That’s what you are. You are nothing else in time. People are watching with their eyeballs, Jim Morrison but Dionysus, the spirit of Dionysus, the spirit of madness and chaos and wildness that enters through the ears. As far as what Morrison did on stage, I’m hardly even aware of him. I know the singer on stage, the performer but I don’t know the mad character people are watching on stage. So, it’s virtually impossible for me to answer that idea.

CS: Understood. Absolutely understood.

MANZAREK: I’m on the inside looking out. I’m not looking in. I’m looking out.

CS: Jim, when he started, humble beginnings, you and him, he had no form of musical training. What did you see in each other that you said, “You know what, we need to express ourselves.” What was that moment that you two shared that really started the genesis of the band?

manzMANZAREK: Well, that moment was Moonlight Drive. He sang Moonlight Drive to me. I heard the lyrics, and I heard his rephrasing and his singing and he was right on pitch and he had a good sense of timing and a good sense of space and I said “You know what, I can play all kinds of funky Ray Charles kind of stuff and Jimmy Smith organ behind that” and Jim said, “That’s cool man, that’s what I hear too. If you can do that that would be fabulous.”

And then he did My Eyes Have Seen You and Summer’s Almost Gone and those were great songs, I could play Bach behind Summer’s Almost Gone. My Eyes Have Seen You I could play all kinds of Latino jazz, southern California Latin style stuff. And Jim says “Sounds great to me, I love that” and that’s what we shared. We shared those ideas ““ those complimentary ideas.

CS: Was there a theology with the band? Was there ever an overarching theme to what the band should be about?

MANZAREK: The band should be about entering a state of transcendental consciousness. Yes. The band should be about LSD. The band should be about rising up out of the mundane, ordinary state of consciousness into a higher state of consciousness, that virtually the entire generation of the 60’s was into and that’s what we tried to do.

CS: I was reading previous articles about how I think people ““ I don’t think in our current time people ““ there is not a rising up of the youth against the oppressive nature of government and what have you that we’ve become a little soft. Do you see yourself, or at least your place in musical history, as something more powerful than just music but you were a force of social and political change?

MANZAREK: Just being in The Doors. A lot of people said “You guys didn’t participate in the marches” and whatnot but I always thought The Doors were political just by their nature. Morrison was the son of an Admiral, for God’s sake. For him to be a rock and roll guy and the son of an Admiral at the same time was virtually unheard of. Everything we did was political. Everything everyone was doing was political. We were in Vietnam just like we’re in Iraq and Afghanistan. The only difference between now and then was there was a draft and anybody could go at any moment. Just pick you up and you’re gone ““ you’re gone off to Vietnam. Now it’s a volunteer army so I suppose that people who haven’t volunteered for the army are, “Cool, I’m not going.”

I didn’t volunteer.

If you want to volunteer to go fight ““ go ahead ““ go fight. It’s like, man ““ we got to make love here not war. I’m getting a little tired of waiting. It’s the 21st century. When do we make love and not war? I don’t think that we’re going to. We like war. We love killing. We think death is great. Kill the bad guys. Aren’t we the good guys by the way? I hope we’re not the bad guys.

CS: I think it gets blurred and I’ve seen it in the idea of capitalism. I think that wraps that up really tightly ““ killing and capitalism. I think the two have gone hand in hand and I think the youth have gravitated to greed and their ideas are in things ““ not ideas of ideas.

MANZAREK: Well, Jesus was a capitalist I think. So, it’s OK to be capitalist. I always thought Jesus was a lover. He loved humanity. He said love the Lord thy God, etc. and love thy neighbor as thyself. Somehow I think we’ve abandoned that idea of love but maybe we’ll get back to it. Who knows?

CS: I don’t know if he ever said anything about being untruthful but in an interview with you I read that your feeling about Oliver Stone’s film was his take of Jim was completely, off, false, not right.

51315665FM001_millerMANZAREK: Yes. Oliver Stone movie”¦.no good. It makes Jim Morrison an alcoholic and a wino, a drunkard, a crazy man. He was actually very intelligent, very sophisticated, very funny. He was a funny guy. It’s entirely the wrong portrait. That’s what so much fun doing When You’re Strange. You are going to get the real Jim Morrison being Jim Morrison and you will see the real Doors. It’s nothing but Jim Morrison as Jim Morrison and that’s what’s so great about When You’re Strange.

CS: Great film.

MANZAREK: That’s cool. Thank you, man.

CS: I was blown away ““ and I’ll tell you straight up that I am just a casual fan, not just a guy who says, “I love The Doors!”, but I got a deep appreciation for the real thing. It wasn’t a fictionalized representation. I was, however, curious about a couple things: One, your involvement was limited. I was expecting to have you and the other band members talking every so often, that didn’t happen, and, two, I was also really floored that Jim’s movie was incorporated into this documentary.

MANZAREK: See that. He was brilliant. He was a brilliant filmmaker. He was a filmmaker, and a writer, and he was Dionysian and wore leather and he was a poet. So there you are.

CS: Was there any part of you that wanted to ““ was it Tom [DiCillo’s] idea not to have you talk on screen or have anybody else talk on screen?

MANZAREK: No, the idea was we don’t have to talk. Just watch the footage. We’ve got plenty of footage. What do you want to see me talk for?

(Laughs)

I want to watch Jim Morrison and if I see Ray Manzarek”¦.I want to see The Doors. So why should we see old guys saying, “When I was a youngster”¦” I don’t want to see that. The only time that was interesting was in Warren Beatty’s movie, Reds.

CS: Good movie.

MANZAREK: It is a good movie. You see the actual people who are being portrayed. But I mean, we got The Doors. Let’s just watch The Doors. To hell with watching the guys comment.

CS: And one of the special things about the band and you might agree or disagree is that The Doors feel like band that was never corrupted by a money man, a corporation. Do you feel it was always true to its own self?

MANZAREK: Incorruptible. The Doors were pure. The Doors were rock and roll. The Doors were artists. They would not sell their souls to the man. No way.

CS: Is that a point of pride for you? That you get to say, “We were what we were and we never compromised?”

MANZAREK: Never compromised. Absolutely it’s a point of pride. Absolutely man. You bet it is.

April 2, 2010

Trailer Park: Michel Gondry

By Christopher Stipp

The Archives, Right Here

I was able to sit down for a couple of years and pump out a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

Check out my new column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

Michel Gondry – Interview

There is absolutely no question that if I were to make a Top 10 list of films for the decade that just past Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind would, without question, has a place in the top slot. A movie that takes the tired and broken trope of what happens when boy meets girl and it goes horribly awry, the movie makes visual the pain and discordance you feel when despondency is your only emotion. Michel has a way of making emotions feel like you could reach out and caress them and his latest film, The Thorn in the Heart, is no different.

It’s a documentary that follows Suzette Gondry, Michele’s aunt, as we see how this matriarch was a vanguard in her time, a teacher who had progressive thoughts on education, and how as a mother she struggled to find peace with her son who just seemed lost after the death of his father many decades ago. The fact that his cousin would years later leave his wife in order to live the live of a gay man, the way he always should have, is pedestrian compared to the caustic relationship he had with his mother, sweet aunt Suzette.

The movie, shot over the course of many years, is a snapshot of one family’s troubles and what it took for them to find some peace and a little bit of solace in the commonality of life. There’s nothing earth shattering about the movie, you expect there to be some kind of deep secret to be let out into the open, and it’s a function, I believe, of the form as of late that seems to implicitly state that a documentary like this has to have a great reveal. It does not. Its reveal is that even in the depths of rural France there aren’t a lot of things that separate these people with people you know across the street. We all have drama of some kind in our lives, the documentary shows, but it’s finding the threads that connect us and weaving them all together to show a portrait of humanity we all can recognize is really this movie’s strength.

Michel Gondry spoke with me this week about the film, which is slated to open today, April 2nd, in New York and shortly after that in Wisconsin and next month in Los Angeles. Check the film’s website for specific locations and times.

thorn_posterMICHEL GONDRY: Hi Christopher. How are you doing?

CHRISTOPHER STIPP: I’m good thank you. How are you?

GONDRY: I’m good, thanks.

CS: I watched your film last night and I have to tell you it’s one of the more moving documentaries I’ve seen this year.

GONDRY: Oh, thank you. Please share your views with the world.

CS: I absolutely am. I think, and that was the first question I wanted to lead off with, was that the film feels very personal”¦

GONDRY: Yeah.

CS: Was there any hesitation on your part in telling the story which felt so private?

GONDRY: I initially had hesitation to put it out but I wanted to tell my own story because Suzette mirrored French history in the schools and I thought that deserved to be shot. Now, when it became more personal I felt maybe it was too personal to show but I think it was more interesting this way because we had the real drama that we explored even though there was some sadness in it. There was a sort of good conclusion and something healthy in doing that.

I think people who have seen it enjoyed it because they could find themselves in it.

CS: I think the movie paints her out to be very tough, very stern, but when I think about the teachers I had, at least the ones that really affected me, those are the ones I remember fondly. Suzette has old students who absolutely remember her, and remember the way she ran a classroom. But I think that toughness ““ that was an important part in order for her to keep going.

GONDRY: I think her toughness is one of the things that I liked. When you are a child, to feel the strength of a parent is very reassuring and I think my parents were lacking that. They gave us lots of great things ““ they were great parents ““ but the strength Suzette had was something I was craving. Because I find my mother to be very weak and I didn’t want to be like that. And I know some people in my family didn’t really like her because she has this sternness about her but I liked her for that. The teachers I liked when I was young was a teacher that was strong but had a sense of humor. And it’s the same with my son. The teacher that he like the best are not the weakest, it was the stronger ones.

CS: That’s interesting. Your son ““ you literally bring your family into the film as well ““ did you have to struggle with that as a parent of trying to find that balance of where to be tough or try not to be too loosey-goosey or too soft with your kids?

GONDRY: Yeah, well, we can talk a long time abut that.

(Laughs)

I think it’s very hard. You have one child ““ I think what’s difficult is to find where to give up and where not to give up in your strength. Many parents set the bar too high when you raise a child ““ let’s say no TV. Too hard to achieve. You say, “No TV”¦No TV”¦No TV” and then after a lot of nagging you say, “OK, TV.” All the thought you put into “No TV” is collapsing. I think one of the keys ways is to pick you battles and stick to them. It’s a problem to be too loose and it’s hard to teach and could be just propaganda. But I found my son was watching too much TV when he was in France and it was all about video games and I recommend that to all the parents just not have the video games at all.

(Laughs)

When it’s there you always have to fight to stop it and it’s so much work. You say “OK, only a half an hour a day” but it’s going to be tough. You are going to spend all your energy fighting with a little person. So, I thought of that and I know that Suzette was way too strict with her son. It’s very difficult to know what indication ““ it’s just who people are. It’s a combination. I don’t know what is the denominator.

46266CS: And that strikes to a point I was going to ask, Suzette at times seems hesitant to answer your questions that become too personal but you keep prodding her and keep poking her and you stay persistent with it. Did you feel you knew there was something there and you had to get it out of her?

GONDRY: Oh yeah. I just wanted it on camera because I thought that was the real subject of the film. It became clear it was about her son and her. It was very difficult to talk about it. It’s a very difficult problem. Jean-Yves has a daughter because initially he was married and he didn’t come out until he was my age and his daughter was ashamed. It’s a difficult problem.

CS: By the end of the film I’m almost, I don’t want to say confused about how Jean-Yves feels but do you think that because he’s come out he’s gained a little bit more perspective, a little bit more healing because of it?

GONDRY: Yeah. He just sent me an email. May I read something I received from him this morning?

CS: Absolutely.

GONDRY: He says in his email:

My dear Michel,
I transfer from French“¦You helped me a lot since 2004 and thanks to you I pull though my problem. I am still unemployed but hope to find work”¦Moreover, I find happiness with Mark”¦Thank you infinitely and I am very happy for everything you have done for me and I can’t find the words to show my gratefulness towards you. I hope one day I hope I can live with Mark”¦His boyfriend.

CS: That’s sweet.

GONDRY: It’s very sweet. He really made me cry when I got it.

CS: Michel, I just have one last question for you. I know my time is short. Suzette in the film, she says she doesn’t fear death anymore. She just seems more concerned with the things that came before this. I’m curious to know whether you as a person have perspective on where you’ve been and not so concerned with where you’re headed.

GONDRY: I’m a very anxious person.

(Laughs)

I think it’s very scary to get old because you know you’ll be dying soon. My hope is that when it’s my time I can figure it out. At the end of my life I hope to figure it out. But I have a great fear and I would be lying to not admit it.

April 1, 2010

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Caissie St. Onge 3

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I welcome back the always very funny writer/producer Caissie St. Onge.

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Caissie St. Onge 3“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-caissie_st_onge-3.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

March 31, 2010

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & James Serafinowicz

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have a bit of a chat with the Creative Director of Funny Or Die UK, writer/producer James Serafinowicz.

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & James Serafinowicz“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-james_serafinowicz.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

March 19, 2010

Trailer Park: Erin Cummings and Steven DeKnight

By Christopher Stipp

The Archives, Right Here

I was able to sit down for a couple of years and pump out a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

Check out my new column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

THE FOURTH KIND – DVD GIVEAWAY

thefourthkindr1artpic1This week I have another contest for you readers out there. This week it’s all about Milla Jovovich.

Starring in The Fourth Kind, the movie is all about exploring alien abductions and government conspiracies. If you’re in the mood for a film that you can pop in the DVD player, pop some corn, and enjoy the lo-fi adventures of a woman who starts to unravel strange occurrences in a small Alaskan town.

If you can cobble together your name and address, manage to send it to me at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com, and give me one reason why an alien wouldn’t want to abduct you as a representative sample, I will enter you in a contest to win one of these.

The film’s synopsis:

In 1972, a scale of measurement was established for alien encounters. When a UFO is sighted, it is called an encounter of the first kind. When evidence is collected, it is known as an encounter of the second kind. When contact is made with extraterrestrials, it is the third kind. The next level, abduction, is the fourth kind. This encounter has been the most difficult to document…until now.

Structured unlike any film before it, The Fourth Kind is a provocative thriller set in modern-day Nome, Alaska, where – mysteriously since the 1960s – a disproportionate number of the population has been reported missing every year. Despite multiple FBI investigations of the region, the truth has never been discovered.

Here in this remote region, psychologist Dr. Abigail Tyler (Milla Jovovich) began videotaping sessions with traumatized patients and unwittingly discovered some of the most disturbing evidence of alien abduction ever documented.

Using never-before-seen archival footage that is integrated into the film, The Fourth Kind exposes the terrified revelations of multiple witnesses. Their accounts of being visited by alien figures all share disturbingly identical details, the validity of which is investigated throughout the film.

Erin Cummings and Steven DeKnight  – INTERVIEW

So, when you go to Comic-Con, as you’re there trying to score interviews, you sometimes have to sit on things.

Last year I did a rather lengthy interview with Zachary Levi of Chuck that I had to sit on for months because we didn’t know when the show was coming back on the air. When I talked to Michael Jai White and Scott Sanders of Black Dynamite, I had to wait for that one to catch a little fire before releasing that one as well. So, when I was literally pulled into a hallway to be shown the trailer for Spartacus: Blood and Sand, now playing on the Starz channel, and had a chance to talk to the always affable actress Erin Cummings who I talked to exactly 12 months before that for her film Bitch Slap and showrunner/writer/director/producer/ender of anyone not in awe of his body art Steven DeKnight I was game to get an interview that would sleep away for months while the show generated some steam.

Cribbing a little bit from 300‘s style but being wholly original in crafting a series that is not your usual sword and sandals production Spartacus separates itself from other shows in that you get blood but you also get a little drama, some heartfelt emotion. The series is just past the half-way point for the first season but it was a pleasure to talk to someone like Steven, a man who has had his fingers in Angel, Dollhouse, Smallville, ahem Viva Laughlin, ahem, and even has written some episodes for Buffy the Vampire Slayer. The man is impressive simply by the successes he’s had on the production and written side of the business while Erin Cummings, who played a tempestuous little tart in Bitch Slap, simply exudes the kind of intelligence, thoughtfulness, and sense of humor you wish more starlets would possess.

SPARTACUS: BLOOD AND SAND is now playing on Starz. Catch a new episode tonight, March 19th.

poster-spartacusveciCHRISTOPHER STIPP:  Explain to me how you balance being both a show runner and executive producer”¦

STEVEN DEKNIGHT: Usually show runner is executive producer.  It’s on the writing side if you create the show and are spearheading the show you are executive producer/show runner.  As opposed to executive producer on the production side.  A show runner is a weird term because I run the show with Rob Tapert. He oversees the production in New Zealand.  So we work together.  I do all the script stuff and he oversees production.

CS:  How did you come on board to do this?  How did this fall into your lap?

DEKNIGHT: I was working on Dollhouse with Joss Whedon and I was approached by my agent saying, “There’s an interesting thing”¦There’s some talk about it having to do with gladiators”¦Sam Raimi and Rob Tapert are producing”Â  I didn’t even know it was Spartacus.  It was going to be on the Starz network and, up until that point, Starz just recently came onto my radar with Crash and a couple of comedies so I said, “I’ll take a meeting.”Â  So, we had a meeting and we all liked each other.  I loved the idea of the project but I wasn’t available because I was directing Dollhouse.  So halfway directing Dollhouse I got another call that they couldn’t find anybody else they really want and when are you available?  Well, I said I finish directing in two weeks.  So literally I finished directing Dollhouse and two weeks later I was working on Spartacus.

CS:  It seems like one of those things like, they say it’s really not who you know but”¦

erinERIN CUMMINGS: I love that you brought that up actually because if ever nepotism was going to work in the favor of anybody, it would have been me because Steven DeKnight, the show runner, had directed me in Dollhouse.  Rick Jacobson, the director of the pilot, had directed me in Bitch Slap.  Lucy Lawless, who’s staring in the series, had a cameo in my film Bitch Slap.  Michael Hurst who has directed episodes, as well, was fourth lead in Bitch Slap.  Rob Tapert, the executive producer of Spartacus was really good friends with the executive producer of Bitch Slap”¦If there’s ever nepotism would work in the favor of anyone, it would have been me but in reality it wasn’t like that.  It wasn’t like, “Oh yeah, just cast her and get it done.”

It was a process in what ended up happening was when they were narrowing their choices down for Spartacus, Steven called me and said, “Hey, we’re looking at this guy for Spartacus and want to see his passionate side ““ we want to see his vulnerable side and how he interacts with women”¦”Â  They knew who they were going to cast.  It was a no brainer.  So they just wanted to see what he would be like with a woman.  So they brought me in as a reader.  So, I did that and they said, “OK we have you on tape, when we start casting for Sura, we will bring you in.”Â  But, once they cast Spartacus they cut off all US casting and looked for Sura in New Zealand and Australia.  So they were not even going to consider me.  Had it not been that I went in and read with Andy that day, I would never have been cast.  Everybody just kept saying, “What about Erin”¦What about Erin?”Â  There was some question as to whether Erin could do the fight scenes but because Rick had worked with me on Bitch Slap and had seen me do fight scenes, he said I could.  It was a killer process for several months from the time we talked about the role and getting cast.  Literally when I was cast they said, “OK, we are offering you the role but we want you to move to New Zealand in three days.”Â  Yes, I knew all the people but they also knew how professional I am on set because they worked with me.  They not only liked me as a person, they knew that I could handle whatever they threw at me.

In a way, it’s who you know but it’s more who knows what about you.

CS:  Why New Zealand?  Why not Toronto?

DEKNIGHT: New Zealand for several reasons.  Massive tax breaks financially.  We were able to slash the budget by 30% and because it was Sam Raimi, Rob Tapert, and Josh Donen.  They had a machine built in New Zealand because of movies they do, like 30 Days of Night, they had all the people down there ready to go.  So they were able to build this streamlined cost effective machine in New Zealand.  When I told people we were going to be filming in New Zealand, they go “Oh, landscape and New Zealand that’s going to be great” sarcastically but I said, “We never go outside.”Â  We are inside a massive tin shack that was built for other reasons in an industrial park and that’s where we shoot.  Everything is green screen.

CS:  Everything you shoot is green screen? How about the coliseum?

DEKNIGHT: Yes, that coliseum ““ all that’s real there is the dirt.  Everything else is green screen and digitally created.  So I really do have interior set stuff and that is all real but if there is ever a windmill or you see the sky outside.  That’s all digital.

CS:  Did you know how many episodes you could reasonably film? How does it work for a cable channel?

deknight2DEKNIGHT: The great thing about working with Starz is that they asked for 13.  They didn’t ask for a pilot, they said go straight to 13″¦and that was season one.  So with the Spartacus legend it’s also great because historically we have touchstones we can figure out and we’ve always figured a 5 to 6 year plan to tell a story.  Because it’s based on history, we know where we’re headed.

CS:  Did you ever work with blocking scenes where guys are flailing around swords in front of a green screen?

DEKNIGHT: Not extensively but we have a great stunt team down there Allan Poppleton is phenomenal and the team is doing amazing things.

CS:  And what was the challenge trying to balance the thrilling fights with the human aspect”¦

DEKNIGHT: The heart of the series really is the human drama.  Spartacus, for example, has a sense of living for the love of his wife.  He’s captured, along with his wife, and she drifted away from him and the only thing he wants to do is get her back.  And everything he does basically is geared toward that love.

CS:  (to Erin) Do you have moments with him or, because you’re separated, do you never come together?

CUMMINGS: In episode one, Spartacus and Sura are together and then as you saw in the trailer and every time you see her it’s in a flashback or flash forward, visions in his head, memories or ideas of what their reunion will be like.  It’s the way Steven has created his story that my character gets to live through him.  Everything I do I work with Andy Whitfield, the man playing Spartacus, and he’s wonderful ““ an exceptional actor and beautiful person and has a heart of gold and makes everyday coming to work so easy and a pleasure to be around.  So, because I only work with Andy that means I don’t work with anyone else.  I’m a little deprived about working with everybody else.  I am friends with them all off set but never have the opportunity on set.

CS:  So you are in his dreams and memories.  Does he think of you like some warrior princess?

CUMMINGS: The reality is that they are under constant threat of attack so when Spartacus goes off to fight, Sura stays at home.  Just like what women are going through right now as there are a lot of women who have husbands that have gone off to Iraq, fending for themselves.  If they have a break-in, who’s going to protect their home?  It’s not going to be the husband who is off fighting a war, it’s going to be them.  Who’s going to protect the children?  It’s the woman that’s sitting at home and that’s what we encountered in the first episode is that Sura is in a situation of fight or flight.  Because she’s the wife of Spartacus, we only can assume that this is a woman who is not afraid of anything.  This is a woman married to the man who eventually is going to start a revolution.  So in a case of fight or flight this is a woman who is going to fight and you better believe it.

Later on, when we revisit another fight scene, where in Spartacus’s mind he thinks about what his wife will be like when she fights.  He’s only imagining her as a champion.  Spartacus imagines what Sura would be like.  She’s the love of his life and she’s going to be a badass and he’s going to think about her as even more of a badass.

CS:  As a show runner, coming up with the way the story is going to move, how you plot it out, how has it been working with the network? Are they more meddling than a Fox, NBC?

DEKNIGHT: Creatively, Starz has been fantastic.  They basically said, “We love the idea, we love the arena you are working on,” no pun intended, and, “start doing it.  I have been working for years now and because Starz is the studio and the network producing it and airing it, I’ve never had so few notes.  They are very hands off, basically.  I may have a note here or a note there and they are usually pretty damn good, honestly.  So it’s been so refreshing.  That and because we don’t have a standards and practices to deal with because we’re cable that’s been great.  Starz on many occasions said, “We want you to push it and we’ll tell you when you’ve crossed the line.”Â  And so far we haven’t.  They keep saying push it further, further.  It’s refreshing to be with a studio network that allows that kind of creative freedom.

CS:  You have all this freedom and wide expanse of what you can do.   Possibilities are endless, it seems.  Has it become overwhelming for you?

deknight1DEKNIGHT: For me, honestly, no because it all comes back to character.  It’s all trying to stay true to what the characters would express, say and do.  Have we gone down blind alleys?  For a day or two in a room breaking stories, sure, we’ve gone down some blind alleys but it always pulls back to that doesn’t make any sense or I don’t think that character would do that, or it just doesn’t feel right for the show.  We’ve never gone down a really bad path.  It’s been pretty smooth sailing I have to say.  I’m a little surprised at how smooth it’s been.

CS:  What do you hope people see in Spartacus?

DEKNIGHT: The great thing about television is we have this long form.  We can delve into characters so much deeper than we can a movie.  Rob Tapert and I loved Gladiator, loved the original Spartacus, we are approaching it from a fanboy perspective, because we are fanboys.  This is something that speaks to the guy in us.  As a fourteen year-old kid I would have loved to have seen this on television.  I wouldn’t have been allowed to but I would have loved to have seen it.  So, basically, what I think we are offering and what we can delve into is the complexity of character that you just don’t have the real estate to do in movies.

For example, Spartacus, the Stanly Krubick movie which I think is a brilliant movie, Spartacus is a golden human being the first time you see him.  In our series, Spartacus is a very flawed person.  He goes down the wrong path a couple different times and he doesn’t start out wanting to make a statement against slavery and save everybody, all he wants to do is get his wife back.  He ends up making one friend but as far as anyone else is concerned he will kill you if you get in his way.  And he slowly evolves into the man everyone knows as Spartacus, which seems to be keeping with history because in historical text ““ once they start out they start robbing and pillaging people.  It wasn’t about freeing anybody but snowballed into that eventually.

CS:  Almost like a Superman story”¦.there is something about showing the flaws of heroes and having them come back triumphant which makes for a better story.  It’s part of what makes the original Superman story is that he is too perfect.  Batman, who veers into that murky lane, has a much more interesting as a not spotless hero.

DEKNIGHT: Exactly.  And what we focus on in Spartacus early in the story is it’s more about revenge.  It’s not about any sort of idealized society.  He’s just pissed off.  Andy Whitfield can play all those levels.  He’s an iconic actor.  As soon as you see him, he is just Spartacus.

CS:  What about you Erin?  You have been playing a lot of roles where you are having to play the heavy”¦

ArcLight CinemasCUMMINGS: I see a trend in the roles I’ve been playing.  They seem to be all bad ass bitches and not going to take any shit.  They are strong and I love that.  I love this character.  It’s my favorite character to play.  It’s important as a woman to recognize that part of being strong is being able to be soft.  One of my challenges as an actor is maybe revealing a little too much.  It’s difficult for me to relinquish control to be soft and vulnerable and let someone take charge.  What I loved about the role of Sura is that she’s an independent woman.  Her decisions she makes benefit her husband first and her second and I think there is something very strong about that.  There’s this sense of wanting to do what’s best for my family and there is nothing servant about that in anyway.  He respects her opinion and asks her opinion.  Whether he agrees or not he wants to know.

Being the woman behind the man is not only exciting and interesting for me but a bit raw and empowering.  She’s a woman who doesn’t have to try and be the man.  Sometimes I say, “My god Erin, can you just be a woman for once?”Â  So, it’s nice to play this character.  And then I take notes from my character and say, “Oh, that’s how I should be acting”¦.like my character.”

CS:  My final question is about the effects.  How has that been, doing what you really want to do but with green screens, computer effects, that has to eat up a lot of budget.

DEKNIGHT: Effects equals money.  Effects are expensive.  There is no two ways to slice it.  A chuck of our budget is effects.  It’s effects you might not even think about.  If two people are standing and talking, and they are outside, in our show it is expensive because we have to put in a sky and it’s an expensive process.  It’s this weird thing because you look at the scene and think it shouldn’t be that expensive but every single shot in that scene is expensive because it’s not the same effect.  It adds up really really quickly.  And yeah, we have to plan our effects because otherwise we run out of money very quickly or go over budget in that episode and if we go over budget for one episode we have to save it in another episode.  So it’s basically robbing Peter to pay Paul at the end of the day.  But the big thing about this show is the effects, it’s the drama and the effects together.  So we have to budget when we go to the arena.  The arena is very expensive so we don’t go to the arena every episode and, when we do, we try to make it count.

And we also wanted the fights to be operatic so we use, not actually CGI blood when they are chopping people up, we do this really cool thing where we film a separate blood element.  It’s actually blood packs that we shoot at high speed and burst open at various different ways and shoot that again on green screen and take the actual blood element and layer it in to the show.  So it’s not CGI blood, it’s like old style effects blood just used in a different way so we can control it and put it in where we want it and speed it up or slow it down.  Rob and I always say there’s a huge debt to Zach Snyder because he opened up how to use visual effects in a new way and we would be lying if we said we weren’t influenced by that.  It’s like when James Cameron started using CGI in the Abyss or in Terminator II.  It’s an exciting tool and I’m excited to bring that to television which we don’t think has been fully explored yet.

March 15, 2010

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Bill Corbett

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have a bit of a chat with playwright, screenwriter, MYSTERY SCIENCE THEATER 3000 alumnus, and one-third of Rifftrax, Bill Corbett.

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Bill Corbett“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-bill_corbett.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

March 10, 2010

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Michael Kupperman

Filed under: A Bit Of A Chat With Ken Plume,Interviews — Tags: , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 5:43 pm

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have a bit of a chat with the artist behind SNAKE ‘N’ BACON and TALES TO THRIZZLE, Michael Kupperman.

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Michael Kupperman“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-michael_kupperman.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

March 9, 2010

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & J. Elvis Weinstein

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have a bit of a chat with a writer, producer, one of the original cast members of MYSTERY SCIENCE THEATER 3000, and now one-fifth of CINEMATIC TITANIC, J. Elvis Weinstein.

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & J. Elvis Weinstein“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-j_elvis_weinstein.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress