FRED Entertainment

May 27, 2010

Contest Round-Up: 2010-05-27

Filed under: Articles — Tags: , , , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 3:26 am

contestheader.jpg

Welcome to our weekly round-up of featured giveaways here at FRED. Every week, we’ll present a new clutch of DVDs, books, and other cool stuff you can take a shot at winning. All you have to do is click on the graphics below to be taken to their respective contest pages. And good luck!

In conjunction with IDW Publishing, we’re giving away two (2) copies of BLOOM COUNTY: THE COMPLETE LIBRARY VOLUME 2.

In conjunction with Sony Pictures Home Entertainment, we’re giving away four (4) copies of THE THREE STOOGES COLLECTION: VOLUME 8 on DVD.

In conjunction with Sony Pictures Home Entertainment, we’re giving away one (1) set of KARATE KID I & KARATE KID II on Blu-Ray.

In conjunction with Fox Home Video, we’re giving away three (3) copies of BURN NOTICE: SEASON 3 on DVD.

Win BURN NOTICE: SEASON 3 on DVD!

Filed under: Contests — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 3:20 am

contestheader.jpg

In conjunction with Fox Home Video, we’re giving away three (3) copies of BURN NOTICE: SEASON 3 on DVD.

Contest ends at 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, June 9th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of FRED Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

One entry per day, per person.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, June 9th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

Win KARATE KID I & II on Blu-Ray!

Filed under: Contests — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 3:09 am

contestheader.jpg

In conjunction with Sony Pictures Home Entertainment, we’re giving away one (1) set of KARATE KID I & KARATE KID II on Blu-Ray.

Contest ends at 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, June 9th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of FRED Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

One entry per day, per person.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, June 9th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

Win THE THREE STOOGES COLLECTION: VOLUME 8 on DVD!

Filed under: Contests — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 2:57 am

contestheader.jpg

In conjunction with Sony Pictures Home Entertainment, we’re giving away four (4) copies of THE THREE STOOGES COLLECTION: VOLUME 8 on DVD.

Contest ends at 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, June 9th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of FRED Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

One entry per day, per person.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, June 9th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

Win BLOOM COUNTY: THE COMPLETE LIBRARY VOLUME 2!

Filed under: Contests — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 2:50 am

contestheader.jpg

In conjunction with IDW Publishing, we’re giving away two (2) copies of BLOOM COUNTY: THE COMPLETE LIBRARY VOLUME 2.

Contest ends at 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, June 9th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of FRED Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

One entry per day, per person.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, June 9th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

May 26, 2010

Interview: Anthony Del Col

Filed under: Interviews — Tags: , , , , — Aaron @ 4:48 pm

soapbox-header.png

Kill Shakespeare Interview: Anthony Del Col

lucyline.gif

killshakespeareissue1Meet Anthony Del Col, writer & co-creator of Kill Shakespeare, a new comic from IDW which has been featured at Toronto Wizard Con, Comic Con and Wonder Con in San Francisco.

Kill Shakespeare is a daring new comic which follows Shakespeare’s most loved characters on a quest to kill a reclusive wizard… William Shakespeare himself. To view the official IDW trailer for Kill Shakespeare, click here. Follow these links for previews of Issue #1 and Issue #2.

Can you tell me a little about yourself and the team behind Kill Shakespeare? I understand you are the Shakespeare geek of the bunch.

It’s funny that I’ve been labeled the ‘Shakespeare geek’ while Conor is the ‘comic geek’ because we both trade off at various times (at this precise moment Conor is reading ‘Richard III’ while I’m going through the latest ‘Fables’ adventures). Conor and I both enter this project with various experiences in the business and media worlds: myself as the producer of some indie films, a music manager and entrepreneur; Conor as a writer, producer and journalist. We work well because of these various backgrounds and our ability to trade off when necessary ““ we both balance the creative and the business at various points.

Was it a challenge to combine your very diverse skill set?

Well, we have to play rock-paper-scissors to make some decisions when there’s a stalemate… Seriously, though, there hasn’t been much of a challenge at all. Our strong partnership comes from a shared story sensibility ““ we both like similar films, books, games, etc. And as mentioned above, we have the ability to trade off on the various aspects of our venture, between the creative and the business. It’s an incredibly challenging and time-consuming endeavor to create, release and market a comic book series like this and it makes it a hell of a lot easier when you have a co-pilot.

In a recent article featured on Bleeding Cool, graphic novelist and Shakespeare expert Kimberly Cox gives a fairly scathing review of the first issue of KILL SHAKESPEARE. How do you respond to her claims that these days everyone hates Shakespeare?

Methinks she doth protest too much… Ms. Cox may have been exaggerating this point but it was still well made… The general perception is that most people hate Shakespeare. This is not true. Most people are not fans of the way that Shakespeare is taught these days. However, when taught or presented properly (as a kinetic, entertaining story) the Bard’s work can come alive and speak to everyone. As we’ve been talking to people over the last year about this project we’re amazed by how many fans of the Bard there are ““ from all walks of life, and all demographics. We’d love the opportunity to bring some of these people together as a community with this project.

How do you think academia as a whole will respond to these comics?

For the most part academics LOVE this project. We’ve heard from librarians, academics and teachers that they see this as a great gateway into the world of Shakespeare ““ a unique way of introducing him to a new generation and set of audiences. However, there have been some purists (such as Ms. Cox) who object to this. That’s okay ““ we delight in the discussion and feel that ol’ Shakey himself would embrace this project (though would be upset that we beat him to the punch).

Was it your aim to make William Shakespeare’s works more accessible through these comics or will it just a positive side effect if they do?

Our top priority at all times is to create an entertaining story. If we don’t do this then we’ve failed completely. However, our second goal is indeed to make the Bard accessible. We want this project to speak to audiences that shudder at the thought of being forced to read or watch Shakespeare ““ whether it’s a fifteen-year-old boy in class forced to study Romeo & Juliet or a fifty-year-old woman who has never had the time.

You and the other Kill Shakespeare creators have often talked of the emerging literary mashup genre (such as Bill Willingham’s Fables) as a source of inspiration. What is it about this genre that has so intrigued you?

It’s the possibility of the “what if” question… What if a character that you’ve read about, analyzed and loved suddenly found him/herself in a new scenario? Or found themselves in the same world as another classic character? What would happen in these scenarios? I’m really intrigued by taking well-known characters (such as the Bard’s) and placing them into a new world and having them come alive to new and unique audiences.

connorandyanthony

The Kill Shakespeare Creative Team (L to R) : Conor McCreery, Andy Belanger, Anthony Del Col.

–

In terms of comics, your debut issue was fantastic in each and every regard. Can you tell us a little bit about the process involved in making Kill Shakespeare happen?

Glad to hear that you liked it! We first came up with the idea six years ago in a brainstorming exercise but after developing it for a while we had to shelve it because Conor and I became busy with some other projects/activities. It was about two years ago when we decided that our story was best served in the comics medium that it started to take flight… We then went out and raised some private money to fund the project, brought IDW Publishing on board, and now our project is really starting to take flight…

I understand the first issue of Kill Shakespeare took 16 drafts to get right. How difficult was it to incorporate such dense reading material into a comic book?

Conor and I actually made a conscious decision to NOT re-read the plays line-by-line because we wanted a fresh take on the characters and their stories. We also did not want to become too caught up in the minute details of each play. We’re trying to write the comics to work on two levels ““ the first level is a straight entertaining tale that everyone can enjoy, whether you’ve studied the plays or not. The second level is to put in little references and Easter Eggs that Shakespeare devotees can appreciate and sink their teeth into (such as naming a brothel that Falstaff takes Hamlet to as ‘The Merry Wives of Windsor’).

How much did you experiment with the mix of modern and Shakespearian language?

Well, we’re getting really good at writing “thee” and “thou”… We made a decision early on that we wanted to go the modern-language route with this project and we haven’t looked back. I know that some Shakespeare scholars (such as Ms. Cox) have blasted us for this decision, but it worked well for Tom Stoppard (Shakespeare in Love, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead), did it not? The element that most makes Shakespeare’s plays inaccessible today is the language ““ don’t get me wrong, it’s beautiful and poetic, but it was written four hundred years ago and is often tough to understand.

Is there anything you can tell us about where this project is going after the initial run of 12 issues?

Fishing for spoilers, are you now?… If the positive reaction continues like it has, Conor and I have a lot of ideas for future installments of our story. We have a trilogy mapped out in our heads which will really dazzle readers and put the characters in some really interesting scenarios. There have been so many characters that we wanted to put into this first series but couldn’t find the room. We’d love to grow out our universe and ’cause there are so many things we’d love to do.

Your co-writer, Connor McCreery said in an interview with Wired.com that if Shakespeare were alive today, he would be J.J Abrams. Is it safe to assume that Kill Shakespeare will keep us guessing until the last minute?

Seeing as how this is the final question in the interview, should I actually answer this, or continue to keep you guessing until the next one?…

Guessing it is! Thank you Anthony for taking the time out of your busy schedule to chat with me.

–

To order your copy of Kill Shakespeare, click here.

Follow Kill Shakespeare on Facebook or visit the official site.

– Mary Hoffman

Bagged & Boarded 57: The Island Of Misfit Finales

Filed under: Bagged & Boarded — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 2:56 am

baggedboardedheader.jpg

What happens when two young men let their love of movies, comic books, and all things “geek” take over their lives? They run away from their families, bringing only the most essential DVDs and comics to their secret, highly fortified underground bunker in sunny Southern California, where they start recording podcasts that will change the world.

Are they heroes?

No.

Are they geniuses?

Far from it.

Are they the future of this planet?

I sure hope not.

Simply put… Matt Cohen and Jesse Rivers are “Bagged and Boarded”.

linesm.gif

BAGGED & BOARDED #57: The Island Of Misfit Finales – In which Matt and Jesse discuss LOST for the final, definite, last time ever. Did the finale satisfy, or… something else entirely? For the first time in BandB history, both Matt and Jesse agree on something (Brendo, however…). So throw spoiler warnings overboard, grab some Dharhma brand munchies, mix up a bunch of theologies, and cast away for the ultimate LOST wrap-up show. ‘Cause hey – at least WE promise to have an ending.

[CONTENT WARNING]: This podcast may contain some foul language and horribly off-color jokes. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
Episode #57 (MP3 format)

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/baggedboarded/bagged_boarded-57.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

Got something to say? E-mail Matt & Jesse at the B & B mailbag.

line.gif

CLICK HERE FOR THE BAGGED & BOARDED ARCHIVES

line.gif

##

May 25, 2010

Soapbox: Stargate Odyssey

soapbox-header.png

Stargate Odyssey

lucyline.gif

In November of last year, Roland Emmerich announced that he was working on a TV spin-off to his latest disaster movie, 2012. The proposed spin off series is to be called 2013 and will follow on from the events of the movie, following a group of survivors to an island off the coast of Africa, where presumably the survivors will find a pile of unused Lost scripts. Whether 2012 was actually a disaster movie or a disaster of a movie and whether 2013 will need to have its title updated if it runs for more than one year are questions probably best left unasked. One question that might be worth asking is if Emmerich honestly thinks that this proposed spin off has a chance in hell of being anywhere near as popular or successful as the only other TV spin off from an Emmerich movie?

The Stargate movie was released in 1994, written by Emmerich and Dean Devlin and directed by Emmerich himself. The movie was a big success for MGM, who own the rights to Stargate and who decided to make a spin off to the movie called Stargate: SG1. Since SG1 first aired in 1997, Stargate has been on our TV screens for a total of sixteen years. Or seventeen years if you count the animated Stargate series, Stargate: Infinities. But please don’t, nobody else does…

gate

SG1 ran for a total of ten seasons and remains that longest running consecutively aired hour long Sci-Fi series in America with two hundred and fourteen episodes having been aired. During the eight season of SG1, Stargate: Atlantis began to air and the two series ran concurrently for three years up until SG1‘s cancellations. Atlantis ran for two more seasons after that, finishing in January of 2009 with a milestone hundredth episode. In October of 2009, Stargate: Universe came to air, is in presently in the final weeks of its debut season and has been renewed for at least one more season by the Sci Fi network. Despite initial criticisms labelling the show as “Stargate: Voyager” because the setting of the series is in a spaceship, the series has already proven that it can deliver every bit as much as the previous Stargate shows. There has also been two direct to DVD movies with two more possibly scheduled for production after MGM recovers from the current financial woes that have even brought Bond to a halt.

Since 2007, the caretakers of Stargate have been Brad Wright and Jonathan Glassner, who developed the SG1 series and MGM who own the rights to the Stargate TV franchise. None of the success that Stargate has achieved since the debut of SG1 has had anything to do with Emmerich or Devlin and they’ve criticised the shows whenever a chance came up to do so and saying that their vision for Stargate is the real version and that the vision that’s endured since 1997 is basically a crass fraud. But MGM’s financial woes have put a halt on development of any feature films for the time being. So Emmerich and Devlin have to hold off on their “real” Stargate sequels, which give Emmerich a chance to bring 2013 to life. Will 2013 be a vindication for Emmerich? Will it out do the success of Stargate? My crystal ball says “no”.

Despite the fact that Stargate is one of the most successful scf-fi shows in the world and the fact that it airs on a station called Sci Fi (I still can’t get my head around SyFy), it doesn’t seems to have many of the usual sci-fi fans. No matter what walk of life you’re in or where your friends come from, whether you consider yourself a nerd or not, you’re guaranteed to know at least a handful of hardcore Star Wars fans. It’s the same with Star Trek, though Trek does get scorned a little more than Wars does by the general public. Hell, if I wear a Browncoat t-shirt into work on any given Friday, at least one person will tell me what a big Joss Whedon fan they are, even though they’ve never seen an episode of Firefly (which is a damn shame). Stargate fans are hard to find. I honestly don’t think I could name two people that I know well who are Stargate fans. Part of this may be due to the fact that Stargate fans are collectively known as “Gaters” which sounds for all the world like it should be a Florida-based basketball team.

In 2005, I went to the Wizard World convention in Los Angeles, and given the nature of the convention, almost every kind of nerd fandom I can think of was pretty well represented there. It was primarily comic-oriented, so it wasn’t unreasonable to expect that the bulk of the people who were out in costume would be there dressed as comic characters. It wasn’t until I noticed so many other people who were representing a multitude of tv shows and movies that I realised how under-represented and down right ignored Stargate was. Even in a room with a few thousand other nerds, Stargate fans are still the folk who end up going to the Prom alone.

But almost anyone with even the most peripheral knowledge of Stargate will be able to tell you one thing they know about the franchise, and that one thing is that the main cast member in SG1 was Richard Dean Anderson. To this day, he remains one of the most enduring symbols of the Stargate franchise, having appeared in numerous episodes of both Atlantis and Universe (including both series’ pilot episodes) and the two direct to DVD movies.

The producers of the three Stargate series have always chosen their actors with great care, knowing full well that incorporating actors from Star Trek, Farscape and Firefly would be virtually guaranteed to bring in new viewers, as well as ensure that the quality of the show remains constant.

A few months after SG1 aired its last episode I got a message on MySpace (yes, it was that long ago) from one of the Dublin Browncoats. I had met the Browncoats a few times and had enjoyed having a few pints with them while talking about nerdy things, but talk had never turned to anything Stargate related. The MySpace message said that Richard Dean Anderson was in Dublin for the midnight launch of Halo 3, and asked if I’d like to join herself and some of the other Browncoats in Dublin to meet RDA. Seeing that my social calendar was fairly quiet at the time, I said I’d love to.

After a little bit of research that day, I found out that Nathan Fillion, Adam Baldwin and Alan Tudyk from Firefly were all in the voice cast of Halo 3 and one of the characters was even to be named “Sergeant Reynolds” after Nathan Fillion’s Firefly character, Malcolm Reynolds. Add this to the fact that RDA is most widely knows for playing MacGyver, and I was pretty convinced that I would be the only person there who was looking to see the guy who played Jack O’Neill for the better part of a decade.

The plan was to meet in Dublin city centre at 6PM to scout out the location that RDA was due to be appearing at and then when we were to go for dinner in the nearest convenient pub. Even though I didn’t know the Browncoats all that well, it was a plan that I could get behind. So before meeting the Browncoats, I went to the local comic shop to pick up an SG1 comic, or poster, or magazine. Hell, even a MacGyver DVD would have done the trick. You can’t go to meet RDA at a video game launch where you have no intention of actually buying the game without having something for him to sign. That’d just be rude. I ended up buying a badly written SG1 comic that had a pretty good photo cover. Stargate merchandise is pretty hard to find in retail stores, even in comic specialty stores. I didn’t have time to put an order in with QMX for merchandise and wait six weeks for delivery, so I had to make do with what I could find.

According to what I’d been told on MySpace, RDA was supposed to be appearing at a store called Game which was in Stephen’s Green Shopping Centre, the building next to where I was working. So periodically during the day, I’d go to check out what was happening in Game. And through the day, all of the signs were pointing towards something pretty big happening, the store was being cleaned, floor space was being cleared, promotional material was being hung up all around the main shopping centre that Game was located in, and most encouragingly of all cameras were being set up inside and outside Game. Yeah… there was no question I was going to meet Jack O’Neill that night.

When I met up with the Browncoats outside the main shopping centre at six o’clock (a full six hours before RDA was due to appear), we went up to the Game store and started asking questions to anyone who was around. They pretty much confirmed what we knew, which was that Halo was being launched at midnight, that the store was opening at midnight and that there was a strong rumour that RDA would be there to launch the game.

destiny

After we found out what we knew already, we decided to head to the nearest bar to have a few pints and grab dinner. I’d only met the Browncoats a few times and some of the people I was with that night were total stranger to me, but we all knew a good idea when we heard it. Even in the company of nerds, beer is the great equalizer. But nerds as a whole are generally very welcoming people anyway.

In between eating and drinking and talk of Firefly there was little mention of RDA or anything else Stargate related. But it was an opportunity to do a bit more research on what was happening that night. Mobile internet wasn’t as effective back then as it is today and all that we could ascertain was that RDA was indeed in town, that he was staying in one of three possible hotels in the city centre and that… the day was Thursday.

After searching for information online, we started making phone calls and each phone call that was made gave us more information but each phone call that was made also gave us conflicting information. RDA was apparently going to be at Game in the Stephen’s Green shopping Centre, at Microsoft HQ, at a rival video game store on the Northside of Dublin and doing a live interview with Ireland’s national broadcaster RTE all at the same time.

A big part of what I love about Stargate is that despite it’s sources of mythology, it keeps it’s own continuity in tact. Most franchises that have multiple writers can’t keep a coherent timeline established. Star Trek suffers from this more than most. In the sixteen years worth of episodes and three live action series, Stargate has drawn from Egyptian mythology, Roman and Greek mythology, the legend of King Arthur and has even shown us Roswell aliens. All that is without even mentioning the times that the franchise has tackled religious fanaticism and difficult subjects like rape and slavery. No matter how big the franchise grows and how deep the mythology becomes, Stargate has always been very accessible and it’s always been consistent in its timeline and in the facts presented.

The facts that we were getting that night in Dublin City were anything but consistent.

At about eight o’clock, we went back to Stephen’s Green Shopping Centre to see what was happening and there was a huge amount of activity happening all around the front of the building. More cameras were being plugged in, food stands were being set up, and equipment trailers were being off loaded. The situation was still the same in that nobody could tell us exactly what was going to be happening or who was going to be appearing, but out of all the options we knew of and all of the events going on around town, this looked like the best bet for some RDA action at midnight. One thing that we did find out though was that the shopping centre was going to remain locked up tight to anyone who wasn’t working there until ten o’clock.

So faced with the prospect of a two hour wait before we could even start queuing, we made another group decision to go to another pub and wait there for a while. We spent roughly two hours in another bar and somehow managed to add three more people to our group by the time we went back to the shopping centre. None of the three new folk were big Stargate fans. I made a point of asking.

When we got back to the shopping centre just after ten o’clock, the place was in a frenzy. There was already a queue of people a few hundred yards long, music was blaring from a stack of speakers about fifteen foot high, three girls who must not be able to feel cold were handing out free cans of Red Bull and there were was someone walking around in a fairly cumbersome looking Master Chief outfit.

Over the course of the next ninety minutes, we moved from the exterior of the shopping centre to a small cordoned-off area outside the Game store. Barriers were erected and very strict lines were set up where people were told to wait. The front of the actual store was hidden from view by two curtains, indicating that there was indeed something or someone that they were hiding. While we were waiting, we played video games, read comics, watched the teenage boys go wild over two girls who were dancing outside the store to whatever cheesy music the cheesy DJ was playing, and generally we managed to entertain ourselves while speculating endlessly about where RDA might be.

At about a quarter to twelve, fifteen minutes before the launch, we collectively had one of those weird moments. You know when you’re in a big group of people, maybe a few hundred or more, and all at the same time, every single person stops talking all at the same time? Well, that’s what happened. The music stopped, the DJ stopped, and we all stopped. Then… the music started up again, but not the same music. It was the theme tune to MacGyver. Every single person in the building, whether they were Gaters or gamers or just people who liked to stand in queues, cheered wildly and the party atmosphere was turned up to eleven.

Now, I should probably mention at this point that out of the dozen or so people in the group that I was in, only one of us actually had any interest whatsoever in actually buying the game. If the “we’re with him” plan didn’t work for the rest of us, we had a contingency plan to buy the game so as to meet RDA and bring the game back the following day to get a refund or at the very worst, get store credit. It was worth that effort just for the chance to met RDA.

So, it was with that plan that at five minutes past midnight (nothing ever happens exactly when it’s supposed to in Ireland. It was midnight-ish, which was close enough) when the curtain came down from the front of Game that we marched slowly in to the store. I had my much read issue of the SG1 comic in my hand ready for RDA to sign. And when I got in to the store, I saw… nothing. Jack O’Neill wasn’t there, MacGyver wasn’t there. They couldn’t even organise a minor Irish celebrity… which was probably a blessing in disguise.

To this day, I can’t help but think that who ever had to edit the footage that the video cameras recorded that night had to edit out a lot of footage of people just looking disappointed. Because we were in the middle of a tightly controlled queue, we had to shuffle around the racks and wait in line to actually get out of the store. When we were outside of the store itself, we started talking to some of the media guys and it turned out that one person we talked to was on staff for RDA. He genuinely was due to be there that night but got delayed in traffic and had to divert to an alternate location. We told him out story and told him how much we were looking forward to meeting RDA. There was nothing he could do for us that night but if we could be at Dublin airport at nine o’clock the next morning, he would be able to organise for us to meet RDA and actually get photos with him. It was a tempting offer, but work commitments kept any of us from taking him up on it. So instead we cut our losses and walked down the road to commiserate with some Chinese food.

Before that night, and many times since, I’ve travelled to various parts of the world and have met quite a few people that I admire, but I’ve yet to meet anyone who’s been in anything that’s Stargate related.

Though that night didn’t quite work out the way I hoped it would, it was a massive amount of fun. A group of people, some who at the start of the night were strangers to each other, went on a quest. Along the way, they found mystery, they found comedy in the drama, they found friendship and they ended up having a very entertaining night.

Basically… it was a Stargate night. But not the Stargate that Roland Emmerich would have us watch.

– Simon Fitzgerald

In Praise Of… An Introduction

Filed under: Articles,Columns — Aaron @ 4:48 am

soapbox-header.png

In Praise Of…

lucyline.gif

Greetings, FRED followers. My name is Jason Lenzi, and I do lots of stuff.

“You’re who and you do what?”, I hear you asking already. “And where’s the review of ‘Letters to Juliet’ I was looking for?”. Well, it just so happens, that I was invited to be here, by none other than Ken Plume. And I happen to think that’s pretty, pretty cool. So, ya know, um, leave me alone.

Let me back up a bit, and explain everything. I make my living doing all sorts of things, some of which I can’t go into here for tax reasons. But mainly I work in the entertainment world, as a freelance producer/writer/what-have-you for television. And I work as a voice over artist, narrating shows, doing radio commercials, some animation, etc. It’s nice work, if you can get it, and finally justifies all the silly and annoying voices I’ve done my whole life. But a few years back I wanted to do something different, something that would get my mind off of the insanity of production, that would be a cake walk , that would once again, somehow turn a life long hobby into something that would earn me some money. So I started a toy company, called Bif Bang Pow! Simple, right?

Well, yes and no. Mainly no. But that’s beside the point. After a year or so, some folks started to take notice of what we were doing. One of those folks was Mr. Ken Plume, instantly marking himself as someone of exceptional taste, intelligence and good humor. I remember the call quite well. I was working as a producer/director on a piece of shit-, sorry, reality series- for an un nameable basic cable network that at one time used to play music videos (and no, it’s not Telemundo. Now stop asking me, please, it’s really not important), when my cell phone went off. I answered, and Ken was on the other end, complimenting our Big Lebowski and Flash Gordon (the movie) action figures. Which was pretty cool of him, as they hadn’t even come out yet. But what he’d seen all over the ‘net, he dug, and he felt compelled to get in touch. He asked me loads of questions about what else we had up our sleeves, and now, feeling comfortable, started to make suggestions. “Have you ever thought of doing something for The Venture Brothers ?” he said. “Yeah, as a matter of fact, I love that show”, says I, “but we kinda got our hands full right now, for a while anyway.” Hearing this, Ken started to sob uncontrollably. Like, really bad. Like, a mental breakdown type of sobbing. Through his muffled and snot filled pleading, I could kind of make out him saying that we were the only company that could do the show justice, and that he really wanted the toys to happen. Sooner rather than later, as he needed new toys to take into the tub to have wars with. Well, that’s how I remember it, anyway.

Eventually, because at that time I still had a heart made of honey and not marble, I gave in. “Ok, ok, I’ll do it. If you have a contact at the network, send them along and I’ll get to work on it. Now, please, stop crying”. That seemed to do the trick, and four years later, I’m happy to say that Bif Bang Pow! got the license for The Venture Brothers, and are about to finally bring little Ken’s dream to fruition. Which, in a way, is how I come to be writing this introductory column. Ken very generously offered FRED to me as a platform to write about whatever I like. I think it’s his way of paying us back for the millions of dollars we’ve already spent on the ‘Venture’ license, R and D, prototypes and marketing. So Ken, thank you for this opportunity.

If you’ve come this far, I can hear you asking another question: “What will I be rewarded with if I keep reading this crap?”. Well, I’m glad you asked. The truth is, I have no idea. I guess you’ll just have to stay with me, and bring along whatever you like as you enter this landscape, and hopefully your accessories will help you along the way. I CAN tell you, that I’ve decided to narrow my ‘whatever I like’ down a bit. Since I also guest blog over at Action Figure Insider, about the toy world, nostalgia and Bif Bang Pow!’s behind the scenes shenanigans, I may be steering clear of some of that at this address.

Chances are if you’re here and have been enjoying Quick Stop Entertainment all these years, and are digging what FRED is doing now, well, you’re probably a pop culture junkie of sorts, and most likely are prone to rooting for the underdog, the left of center, and cult favorites of the world. Which is good for me, because that’s just the sort of thing I’d like to write about: the forgotten, the unappreciated, the mocked, and the misunderstood.

I’m gonna call my column here “In Praise Of…”, as a small homage to Leonard Nimoy’s best television series, “In Search Of…”. Remember earlier when I said I did a lot of ‘stuff’? Well, I also LOVE a lot of ‘stuff’. Music, books, movies, tv, toys, and various other sundries. Now, not all of those things are loved by everyone I know. And some of them aren’t even LIKED by anyone I know. And some, well, they’re just plain HATED by everyone on the planet. But I thought that if anyone might be open to suggestion, or to having their horizons expanded, it’d be the FRED audience. And before you get there, I know, I know, there are literally hundreds of sites out there already that praise cult items on a daily basis, make obscure category top ten lists, and feature essays like “Why Timothy Dalton is the most underrated actor of all time”. (Well, he kind of is). I still like to think I’m going to be doing something different, and funnier, as big headed as that sounds. At the very least, I’ll be exposing my guilty pleasures to the world, without fear of arrest. I hope you’ll come along for the trip, it gets awfully lonely here in the cult wilderness. Make some popcorn, brew some tea, or make a sandwich and grab on with your free hand. You just might learn something. Back soon…

– Jason Lenzi

FREDagator: 2010-05-25

Filed under: Articles — UncaScroogeMcD @ 3:34 am

fredagator.png

lucyline.gif

A brief history of pixel art via Pixels: A Pixel Art Documentary…

[ad#contestbox]

Douglas Adams Tribute

tvornottv2.jpg

Assembled ~4/2005

adamsThat he was born is just one of the many undeniable facts about the life of the late Douglas Adams – author, humorist, raconteur, speaker, and thinker (although it should be noted that, on at least one parallel Earth, Mr. Adams was born a spring-toed lemur with a predilection for grassy fields and the works of Byron – a poetic lemur whose work was not terribly springy).

Another fact which comes to mind is that, of the 7 novels he wrote in his all-too-brief lifetime, by far the most popular is The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy and its four sequels – which make for a fine trilogy if you’re somewhat numerically impaired. Please don’t take this as a slight against Adams’s other novels, featuring detective Dirk Gently (Dirk Gently’s Holistic Detective Agency and its sequel, The Long Dark Tea-Time of the Soul), as they are both fine pieces of writing, and should also be read. Your reading list should also include the spoof dictionaries he co-wrote with John Lloyd (The Meaning of Liff & The Deeper Meaning of Liff), as well as his book on endangered species, Last Chance to See (with Mark Carwardine).

Sadly, Douglas Adams passed away on May, 11 2001 in California, where he had spent decades trying to get Hollywood to comprehend (and realize) a big screen version of Hitchhiker’s. Thankfully, he left behind a legacy in print that will not soon be forgotten, as well as a few deadlines that are still pending.

On the eve of the release of the big screen version (Iteration? Interpretation? Desecration? You judge…), I asked a few of Douglas’s friends, colleagues, associates, and vague acquaintances (for the sake of balance, naturally) to provide an anecdote they feel best described the Douglas they knew.

As a poet once said, “My enemy is hopelessness, my ally honest doubt. The Answer is a Question that I never will find out…”

In all fairness, another poet once said, “Don’t you know how sweet and wonderful life could be?… So let’s get it on…”

lucyline.gif

TERRY JONES
(author, director, Python)

I was lucky enough to buy two tickets for the first ever screening of Abel Gance’s Napoleon in Kevin Brownlow’s restored version. I don’t know why I bought the tickets, because I’d never heard of either the film nor Abel Gance, however the idea of a five hour silent film with a final sequence that prefigured Cinerama with three screens interlocking sounded pretty intriguing.

However, when the day of the screening came (a Sunday), I had a hangover and so did my wife. She decided she didn’t feel up to sitting in the cinema watching a silent movie from 10.00am until 5.00pm. So I rang Michael Palin. He said he had a hangover and didn’t fancy the idea of sitting in the cinema watching a silent movie from 10.00am until 5.00pm. So I rang up Douglas. He said he had a hangover and didn’t fancy the idea of sitting in the cinema watching a silent movie from 10.00am until 5.00pm.

So I gave up, and decided that since I’d bought the tickets, hungover or not, I’d have to go on my own.

Just as I was leaving the house, however, the phone rang. It was Douglas. He said he’d been thinking about it, and the idea of sitting in the cinema watching a silent movie from 10.00am to 5.00pm sounded so dreadful that he just had to do it to see if it was as dreadful as it seemed.

So that’s what happened. Douglas and I met up, thinking we’d give the middle of the film a miss, but instead finding ourselves riveted and at each interval impatient to get back into the film. It was, in short, one of the cinematic events of my life.

But for me the interesting thing was Douglas’s fearless curiosity. He came precisely because it sounded like such a bad idea! That really was Douglas.

lucyline.gif

JOHN LLOYD
(producer, writer, co-author of The Meaning of Liff)

The Hitchhiker movie was almost 23 years in turnaround.

I spent September of 1982 with Douglas (and his then girlfriend, Jane) in Donna Summer’s beach-house in Malibu.

We were supposed to be writing a book called The Meaning of Liff, but Douglas spent much of the time in meetings with movie people, trying to find someone he could get on with.

One day he returned from one of these encounters distracted and bewildered. He had just met a grotesque caricature of the archetypal Hollywood producer – a squat, toad-like man with an enormous cigar.

This creature, so Douglas reported, had the following proposal:

“So Doug,’ he growled, ‘We’re gonna eat a little lunch, maybe take a few moments to go over the idea and the money – and then we’re gonna talk about what kinda animal ya like to sleep with…”

lucyline.gif

SUSAN SHERIDAN
(actress, “Trillian” in the Hitchhiker’s radio series)

I certainly admired Douglas, for his dedication to his causes, and his “‘off the wall” sense of humour.

“Goodbye and thanks for all the fish” was a stock phrase in our house for years!

But the concept that we are in or among not just one but many dimensions is just the most wonderful thought – and who knows, it might be true.

I suspect D thought so…

…and ruled by white mice… how brilliant is that?

And of course, memories of him rushing the scripts in at the last minute…no wonder we didn’t understand it half the time!

I envy the film cast having scripts in advance!

lucyline.gif

NEIL INNES
(singer/songwriter, Rutle, one of the many legitimate claimants to the title “7th Python”)

Douglas Adams and I share the distinction of being the only two people – other than the team themselves – ever to have put pen to paper with Monty Python. It was while I was writing with Graham Chapman that I first met him… he would regularly join us for “lunch” – very lively and jolly occasions, often the highlight of the day.

Somehow or other the idea was spawned that Douglas and I should write a musical together, and a couple of years later, no sense in rushing these things, he drove up to Suffolk for the weekend. The family and I had only just moved to the country and we literally lived up a riverbed that was also a road – most of the time. It was wild and the kids adored it.

Douglas arrived with his guitar and fashionable London shoes in a style aptly named “slip-on”. Wide-eyed, he got out of the car and began to enthuse about Nature and Being. As I escorted him across the lawn, the only way to the house at that time, his feet suddenly slid from under him and he did the best impression of an Oliver Hardy fall I have ever seen!

A big man in so many ways, I shall never forget the sight of Douglas lying flat on his back, precious guitar held safely aloft, still extolling the beauty of the English countryside.

lucyline.gif

GRAHAM CHAPMAN
(writer, author, ex-Python)

(Mr. Chapman could not be reached in time for deadline)

.
.
.
.

lucyline.gif

NEIL GAIMAN
(author)

I was working on Don’t Panic! and that day I was at Douglas’s brand new Islington house going through dusty filing cabinets, pulling out early drafts of the TV series scripts and notes and old fan mail and such.

Douglas himself was off doing the sort of things that Douglas did, like contemplating writing something for the Comic Relief Live programme booklet, and then having lugubriously contemplated, taking a bath. There was a sudden scurrying and commotion as a Douglasy sort of noise came from upstairs, followed by the arrival downstairs of Douglas’s stepmother. “He says there aren’t any towels in the bathroom and he’s in the bath. Where are the towels?” she asked, and Douglas’s assistant went off with her to locate the linen closet and find Douglas a towel.

I thought, of course. You have to be the kind of person who doesn’t know where his towel is to notice that the people who do are the truly cool people. And I was glad Douglas didn’t. And I went back to the filing cabinets.

lucyline.gif

DAVID LEARNER
(actor, stage and TV “Marvin, the Paranoid Android”)

Warm from the day. The sun exploded into the china clay pits in Carclaze. Twenty-five years on and they’re so close to the Eden project. The Douglas project? Jim Francis was propping up a model of the “Heart of Gold” on stones. Special effects? Yes, given the budget. None of your movie money here.

Way way back up the hill stood Simon (Jones), sweltering in his dressing gown. Mark (Wing-Davey), complaining for the thousandth time about the other. David (Dixon), the best dressed of all of us: Ford always had it easy. Sandra (Dickinson), actually Sandra wasn’t wearing an awful lot, sleek and cat-like in red. Me, bringing up the rear, in the suit. The suit and I had no relationship whatever. Previously Jim and Perry had taken the usual forty minutes to screw me into the thing, leaving just the top of my head sucking in the Carclaze air. Now it was on. Bad mood? I should say so.

Down there, Douglas and Alan. Mike with a megaphone. “Roll!”

We ambled down the track. Breakfast was a long time away. I was getting hungry. “Cut! That’s a wrap.”

Simon said, “Bollocks. I still had my sunglasses on. Do you think anyone noticed?” It was very Arthur Dent.

Douglas’s choice at last of where we were eating. Actually, he always chose what we ate. The Mevagissey fish restaurant was fantastic. His choices were blindingly accurate. Usually. “It’s called …..”

I daren’t say what it was called. It’s probably still going. “It’s forty miles away!” I said.

It mattered not a jot. We piled into the motors, headed out across the moor. Everyone trying to keep up with the Porsche and failing admirably. The sun had slid down the sky. Even Marvin would have sighed at its beauty.

What was wrong with the meal? Don’t know. The place had a superb reputation, the service was excellent; it just didn’t … gel. We were expecting to give it ten out of ten; heck it was expensive.

For the first time that night I heard Douglas tell the story of the railway café, the bloke, the biscuits, the other bloke opposite. You know that story: it’s in one of the books, somewhere, of course. It was the end of meal. We’d been listening to a brilliant story teller tell a brilliant story. A general sigh of appreciation, the warmth of the evening, the company, the pleasure at having created another piece of television history.

In a sweeping gesture, Douglas paid for everyone. That was his way.

lucyline.gif

CLIFF PINNOCK
(assistant floor manager, Hitchhiker’s TV series)

Towards the end of filming the TV version of the Guide, my wife and I adopted a homeless dog from the RSPCA.

He was thought to be an Irish Wolfhound crossed with a German Shepherd. He was gigantic, hairy and bore his oversized face and nose regally. They said he was about three years old.

He was an amazing dog; faithful, adventurous and completely fearless. He was able to escape from anywhere with amazing ingenuity and could be completely distracted whilst planning his next escapade.

He wrestled with enormous toys and, being extremely strong, would drag people along with him on a whim. At the same he would exhibit great naiveté and be surprised by the simplest of things. He was fearfully protective, but incurably curious.

He would disappear completely and we would search the streets and lanes for hours growing frantic with worry, sure that some terrible fate had befallen him. Then he would shoulder through the door, often followed by some amazing new friend who he had discovered on his travels.

Somehow we all laughed with him and not at him, because he allowed us to see the humour from his point of view, rather than clowning.

He was run over outside our house by an articulated lorry and died much too young.

We had named him Douglas and the parallels, for me, are inescapable….

lucyline.gif

MARK CARWARDINE
(Zoologist, Conservationist, Environmentalist, co-author Last Chance to See)

Both Douglas and I have very low boredom thresholds. We spent an inordinate amount of time talking about everything under the sun. Funnily enough, Douglas didn’t read much while we were travelling. I don’t think he could concentrate on something so different and far-removed from the situation in hand. But the first thing he did on getting back to civilization was to buy books and ready solidly for hours.

When we got back to Sydney after our visit to Komodo, he went to his hotel room and disappeared for an hour – shaving, showering etc. – and then went off to find a bookshop. He bought at least 20 books on an incredible variety of subjects and then went back to bed for three solid days and nights to read the whole lot in one sitting.

His other great thing on returning to civilization was the phone – he made loads of phone calls.

The thing about Douglas was that he thoroughly enjoyed roughing it and life in the wilds for a week or so, but then he pined for the comforts of civilization. Completely understandable, of course.

lucyline.gif

STEPHEN FRY
(author, actor, director, bon vivant)

Douglas and I, as the first two owners of Apple Macs in Europe, played for years (before the internet would have made it easier) like kids with train sets, swapping software and routines and programmes. No colour, no hard disks for some years: but damn it was fun.

Downstairs lurked Sue Freestone, DNA’s publisher, wishing that I would go away so that Douglas would get on with his latest novel. As a way of getting rid of me she offered me an advance for a book of my own.

So I went off and wrote one.

When I came back Douglas was no further forward with his. As is well known, he HATED writing.

He was a huge man: when he was in a house it rattled and you always knew he was there. He did the same to the earth. It doesn’t rattle any more now that he’s gone.

lucyline.gif

MICHAEL NESMITH
(singer/songwriter, producer, author, entrepreneur)

Douglas Adams could see connections between things, people, and ideas that ordinary people either never saw, or finally saw long after Douglas had seen it. It was a singular talent, intuitive to Douglas, and developed to a unique and extraordinary extent. As a result Douglas had many friends who never would have met each other were it not for him. Douglas himself was the hub. His ability to discern these unseen connections made him a friend to a remarkably broad array of very different people.

When I was a teenager I saw a cartoon by Paul Crum of two hippos in a remote jungle stream with just their nose above water. They were talking, and one was saying to the other “I keep thinking it’s Tuesday”.

The cartoon impressed me deeply. I thought the cartoon amazingly funny. It captured something special.

I listened in astonishment one afternoon as Douglas told a group of reporters of having seen that same cartoon when he was a teenager, and how much it had meant to him. Douglas and I had never mentioned it to each other before that moment, although we had been friends for ten years.

It didn’t surprise Douglas. For him it was the final appearing of something he had intuitively known since we first met. Fortunately for me Douglas offered his friendship based on that hunch, and I will always treasure it.

lucyline.gif

MARK WHEATON
(screenwriter)

When I met Douglas Adams – for the briefest of moments – I was a broke grad student at Indiana University who had most of his books memorized but only an aged, dog-earned Long Dark Tea-Time of the Soul amongst my possessions. I’d seen a small poster advertising a lecture being given by Adams at IU and went – book in hand hoping for an autograph – expecting a throng.

The lecture wasn’t exactly a sell-out, but for those of us who showed up, it was a truly great night. Adams came down off his podium when he noted the attendance, invited everyone to move up close, and started off by saying he would have to amend his typical Q&A as he always answered the question, “Where
do you get your ideas?” with: “A small mail-order company in Indiana.”

Though the lecture was mostly about the environment – somewhat in conjunction with the book Last Chance to See – Adams talked about the nature of humor, recalling a story about driving in the American Southwest and passing a sign reading: “Strong Winds May Exist.” He extrapolated on this for awhile, making eloquent use of his trademark humor, but then told us a story that, he explained, would have a funny set-up, but a horrifically disappointing ending. I won’t recall it anywhere near as well as Adams did, but it went something like this.

Adams was driving around London and ended up talking to a police officer/bobby – the kind that wore the large, pointy helmet. Anyway, he went off in his car, only to find himself soon chased by the police, people in the neighborhood, little kids, buses – you name it – everyone pursuing him. That’s when he realized that the bobby’s hat – the theft of which was an arrestable offense – was on top of his car.

So, he stopped and gave the helmet back.

He told the story brilliantly and everybody got a laugh. At the end of the evening, Adams signed autographs and chatted with fans. I got up to him and talked to him about radio-theater, something we agreed was a great way for a young writer to cut their teeth. He was curious about where they practiced it in America and we got on the topic of Austin, Texas – a place Adams thought was pretty nifty. And that was it. When I found out he had passed away, it was the first time the death of an author really made me feel truly regretful of what writing may have yet been still to come.

lucyline.gif

KEN BUSSANMAS
(writer)

I distinctly remember the first time I “met” Douglas Adams – I was 13 years old and had decided that I was going to write for Doctor Who. After several phone calls (a story unto themselves that will be recounted elsewhere), I was put through to the Doctor Who production office and turned over to its new Script Editor, one Douglas Adams.

Either I was far better at disguising my age over the phone than I believed possible or Douglas was so intrigued that an American would show any interest in writing for Doctor Who at the time to give it a second thought. Whatever reason he had for not hanging up the phone the instant I came on the line, it began a series of phone calls wherein we discussed pretty much anything that came to mind and very rarely the task at hand, which was writing stories for Doctor Who.

At the time, the US market was considerably behind the BBC and the series hadn’t yet taken off in America the way it would a few short years later. My first request was to ask Douglas for a copy of the Writer’s Guide for the series, the story bible that writers use as a framework for submissions.

There was a long pause.

“We haven’t got one”, he finally replied.

“That’s okay,” I said, “just get me the one for last season and I’ll go off of that one until the one for this season is ready.”

Yet another long pause and a deep breath followed.

“It’s not that we haven’t written one for this series, Ken,” he started off, almost sheepishly. “We’ve never had one. I’m really sorry about that and I know you must think we’re very unprofessional for that but I can try to work you up something to use.”

I couldn’t believe it – I had one of the people responsible for producing a series I was practically begging to write for apologize to me for not having a writer’s guide! I think he mistook my stunned silence as some kind of indictment of Doctor Who, the BBC and himself as a person. “I’ll make sure you’ve got something to work with by the end of the week,” he told me and he was good to his word. A remarkable accomplishment considering how legendary his inability to meet a deadline became in the years that followed.

The “writer’s guide” that appeared in my mailbox nearly two weeks later was three typewritten pages, each weighed down by at least a few ounces of Liquid Paper. Douglas, it seemed, would “edit on the fly” and the extra postage reflected the extra weight. It was hilarious, reflecting the personality of the man I’d been speaking with on the phone and almost completely useless for its intended purpose as it gave no directions whatsoever on characters or settings. Still, Douglas Adams had a great influence on my life and my career simply for being who he was and being gracious enough to give someone he didn’t know a chance.

lucyline.gif

KEVIN JON DAVIES
(Hitchhiker’s TV series animator, documentary maker, and concept artist of The Illustrated Hitchhiker’s)

During one studio session for the 1981 BBCTV series of The Hitchhiker’s Guide I sat with Douglas for a while behind the director, Alan J.W. Bell, up in the control gallery. Alan was speaking to his Floor Manager via the talk-back system as they diplomatically wrestled with an awkward actor who was holding up the proceedings. This guest star (who’d better remain nameless) had, frankly, been having trouble remembering his lines since the rehearsal period and his latest excuse was to blame his uncomfortable seating arrangements. Douglas fumed as his precious script was mangled yet again.

“Why doesn’t he just prop himself up a bit?” I murmured.

“Why doesn’t he just f*** off!” barked Douglas, loudly. The comment shot straight down the director’s microphone and out to every pair of headphones on the studio floor. I later learned that even those without headphones could hear the remark.

“Who said that?” demanded the rather compromised F.M., “Was it Kevin?”

(I don’t think he liked me…!)

Alan glanced round at Douglas and replied ruefully, “No, I’m afraid that was our writer…!” Douglas just grinned, unashamedly.

In January 1984 I attended a glittering ceremony where Douglas was to collect his first Golden Pan Award as the youngest author under 30 (apart from poor little Anne Frank) to sell a million copies in the Pan Paperback edition alone. His publisher, making the presentation, spoke at length about Douglas’s famous inability to meet deadlines. They used to wonder whether, come each delivery date, Douglas was actually at home finishing the latest novel or out somewhere wrapping another Porche around a lamppost (the fate which befell his first – within a fortnight). To rapturous applause, Douglas accepted his prize statuette and turned to the audience; “I’ve known about this evening’s presentation for sometime,” he grinned, “And I’m pleased to say my acceptance speech is very nearly ready!”

lucyline.gif

M.J. SIMPSON
(writer, author of Hitchhiker: A Biography of Douglas Adams)

I didn’t know Douglas Adams socially; I just met him professionally a few times. But when I did meet him I found him to be enthusiastic, amiable and polite. I think he was slightly bemused by being a ‘celebrity’. He used to worry that it wasn’t normal for writers to be recognizable, but at the same time he was a frustrated performer who loved giving readings and interviews. I always summed it up as: he didn’t really like ‘fans’ but he was always happy to talk with ‘a fan’.

I wrote a huge article about the history of Hitchhiker’s Guide in SFX magazine for the series’ 20th anniversary in 1998. The movie deal had just been announced and Douglas very kindly wrote a few paragraphs about it for the feature. No agents involved, no hassle, no fee – he was that approachable, although I’m sure he wrote the stuff for me in order to avoid having to write something else for someone else. Nevertheless, I take pride in being almost the only person on Earth to have commissioned some writing from Douglas Adams and received it before my deadline.

I think it is interesting, and a little sad, that Douglas’s name has been so low-key among all the publicity and hype for this movie. The trailers just said “From the celebrated best-selling novel” – but omitted to mention who wrote it. On the other hand, it may be best for Douglas Adams’s reputation that he isn’t linked too closely with the film. Despite what many people are saying, he didn’t write it. He wrote a screenplay which Disney rejected, then he died, and then another writer came in and wrote a new screenplay incorporating material from Douglas’s version. WGA rules mean that both writers are credited, though they never met.

A much better tribute to Douglas is the new, final radio series based on the fourth and fifth Hitchhiker books. The reason those books don’t work very well is because they were rushed so there is almost no editing. Douglas needed a good editor or producer to make his work really shine and what Dirk Maggs has done with these final eight scripts is extraordinary and exactly what an editor would have done with the books had there been time.

lucyline.gif

DIRK MAGGS
(Adapter/Director, The Hitchhiker’s Guide To The Galaxy Quandary & Quintessential Phases)

In the early 1990s I was, like Douglas Adams and Geoffrey Perkins before me, a Producer in BBC Radio Light Entertainment. As well as comedy programmes our output included ‘Light Drama’, and whilst making action serials featuring the DC Comics characters Superman and Batman I was able to develop a radio production style which layered lots of sound effects and music onto a tightly written, cinematic script. It was, and is, an incredibly labour intensive way to work, and at times I still wonder what rod I made for my own back. But these early efforts had caught Douglas’s attention, and he was in talks with the BBC about further radio series of Hitchhiker’s. One spring morning in 1993 he called my boss Jonathan James Moore and asked if I would be interested in taking on the job of producing them. I was floored. Apart from marriage and children, nothing before or since has so wonderfully and unexpectedly trumped my expectations of life.

That proposed first series ground to a halt due to script problems and contractual difficulties. Then talks I had with Douglas and Robbie Stamp in 1997 to restart the process through their Digital Village company were scuppered by the long-awaited Movie Deal coming through. When we last met, in Broadcasting House Reception in 2000, we were still making hopeful noises about finishing the saga on radio. And then, overwhelming any such petty concerns, Douglas died. Against all odds it was a chance meeting at his Memorial Service which revived the idea, and this time it actually happened.

I did not know Douglas as a friend, but on the occasions we met I liked him enormously, whether he was enthused, taciturn, distracted or utterly pissed off. I can only thank him for having faith in me, and recall a moment when perhaps I helped maintain his faith in himself. After the Tertiary Phase collapsed in 1993 I was ‘poached’ to produce Ned Sherrin’s Radio 4 chat show Loose Ends. Mostly Harmless had just been published in paperback and I invited Douglas in as a guest, as well as Sir Ranulph Fiennes, who had just manhauled a sled across Antarctica, losing useful items like fingers and toes to frostbite. As the great explorer told an epic tale of suffering and endurance, Douglas’s face fell.

Afterwards, in the pub, I asked if something had upset him.

“Oh, not really,” said Douglas. “It’s just that talking about being locked in a hotel room to write an overdue novel seems pretty tame stuff compared to trekking across a thousand miles of icy crevasses.”

“Well you need to put things in perspective,” I replied. “First of all, your struggle was on a more human scale, and the result is a unique achievement no-one can match. Secondly, just before we went on air, Ran Fiennes got lost in the basement of Broadcasting House looking for the toilet.”

Douglas smiled and picked up his glass. “That makes me feel much better.”

douglasaward.jpg

I want to thank everyone who shared their thoughts and anecdotes about Douglas, especially those who set aside crippling deadlines of their own to make sure this piece had their input. Of course, I could have gone through with my original plan – in honor of Douglas – and run this piece four months late…

-Ken Plume

May 24, 2010

TV Or Not TV: THE END of LOST

Filed under: TV Or Not TV — Tags: — admin @ 2:28 pm

tvornottv-header.png

Six years, over 121 hours, and now it’s THE END.

First and foremost I have to say that as a fan of LOST, having watched it from the very beginning, I was completely satisfied with the ending of LOST. It brought a certain level of cohesiveness to this six year journey that I wasn’t really aware of all the way up to the final episode. It treated me, as a fan, in a kind manner and after all was said and done it let me know that it was OK to say good-bye to these characters that I’ve followed all this time. It didn’t try to be overly intellectual but at the same time it was still damn smart television.

I didn’t realize when I was writing my post-LOST wrap up last week that I would be hitting the nail on the head when I said that the flash-sideways world was in many ways coming across as a love letter to the fans. This entire season we’ve been building up to a moment of closure in the flash-sideways world, which I’ll just now refer to as the Gathering, as it got ready to cushion the blow for us that we all knew was coming. We knew that some people would make it to the end of the show, others wouldn’t, but the Gathering is the place where eventually all of our characters would come back together and prepare themselves for whatever the next step is after their journey in LOST would end. As viewers it was a place that reminded us that it doesn’t really matter what characters get off the Island and which ones don’t because eventually everyone dies and after they do they would come to the Gathering and rejoin those that they wanted to be with. This was their reward for entertaining us and this is the place where we know it is OK to wish them well and know that we can all move on now from our LOST experience together.

In a similar line of thought I also found that the Gathering is that special place for us, the viewer, where the characters will always be there for us to enjoy them again later much in the same way our favorite literary characters still reside in our books when we return to them. I’ve never been happy with the eventual death of GLEN BATEMAN in that Las Vegas jail cell but when I come back and read THE STAND again I can always find him sitting by a creek, painting, and waiting for his eventual discovery by STU REDMAN.

Of all of the characters that came to their realizations of where they really were in the Gathering I think the journey that was most interesting was actually that of BENJAMIN LINUS. In many ways I think it is fitting that BEN’s journey stands out for me given that the amazing acting of MICHAEL EMERSON transformed a simple three episode guest spot in the second season into one of the most complicated characters on network television who stuck around for the remainder the series run. In the Island word BEN sought and was granted redemption, so much so that he goes on to act as a confidant to HURLEY, the purest soul on the show. In the Gathering BEN is outside of the church in those final scenes and apologizes to LOCKE for what he had done to him. He further bonds with HURLEY but when it is all said and done he remains outside. I’m sure there are many interpretations why. BEN may have come to bid farewell to all of these lives that he had been involved with but knows that his journey doesn’t continue with them. Maybe BEN is waiting for ALEX and DANIELLE to have their own realizations so they can journey on together as a family. Perhaps his deeds as a man make it so that he can not continue on. I don’t know the answer but I love that the complexity of the character now will live on in perpetuity.

The big bit of enlightenment for me in watching the finale, the bit that much like The Dude’s rug really tied it all together, was the realization that what we had watched for the past six years was at its core one man’s journey. The series began with the awakening of JACK SHEPHERD after the crash. Looking back at the past six years it may be that his awakening was also in more of a spiritual sense. He was a man that was broken and needed to travel his own journey to redemption. When it is all said and done that redemption comes after fulfilling his purpose in restoring balance to the Island so that it can continue on beyond him. For six years we were able to see that journey and travel it with him and bore witness to the sacrifice he made that allowed for his redemption. The fact that it was his story and his journey that we followed is reflected in those that were chosen, or drawn together, to be with him in the Gathering before they all passed on to whatever comes next. This is possibly another reason why BEN wasn’t part of JACK’s Gathering.

I’m sure that there will be those that will simply look to the obvious and cry foul. They will be angered because they still don’t know exactly what the Island is, why babies stopped being born on it, or any number of other dangling questions that may be out there. The truth, however, is that in the grand scope of LOST we won’t be any happier if we actually knew why JULIET was branded by the Others, how WALT was special, or where Kate’s toy plane went. In the big picture these things don’t apply because what we were watching was JACK’s story and these answers just aren’t important to his story being told.

Be aware, as well, of the future because there may still be just a bit more of LOST for us to discover. The series finale breaks the 44 minute average show model and there may be a few scenes we didn’t see to help pad the shows so they can complete and balanced for syndication. Maybe we’ll see how BEN gets out from under that log, how JACK got back to place where the plug had to be put back in the ground, or maybe even a scene where MILES, RICHARD and FRANK are in an outrigger during pouring rain and another outrigger mysteriously appears in front of them and they open fire? This is all just based on conjecture but I can’t see much being trimmed from this finale in order to make it into two clean episodes. I guess we’ll eventually see.

The executive producers have also hinted that they haven’t quite completed telling their story of WALT. I don’t know where they plan on telling more of it so keep an eye out on the Internet, TV, DVD store or local comic book shop for that story possibly wrapping up.

Here is a simple laundry list of all of the things that I came away liking in the finale:

  • The Island truly was a cork keeping evil, malevolance, whatever at bay.
  • The knowledge that DESMOND was actually given a glimpse into the afterlife and didn’t even realize it.
  • The emotion evoked during each of the characters realizations in the Gathering.
  • The simple fact that MILES, FRANK and RICHARD actually got off the Island after being dragged there not knowing what they were really getting in to.
  • HURLEY taking on the mantle of ISLAND protector after JACK. This made his confidence and knowledge acquired before the Gathering even more meaningful.
  • The shock BEN had at being asked by HURLEY to help him in protecting the ISLAND.
  • The mutual respect that BEN and HURLEY have for each other at the Gathering.
  • The multi-denominational nature of the back room where JACK accepts his own death at the church.
  • VINCENT keeping JACK company in the bamboo forest so that our hero would not have to “die alone.”

So there we have it folks, THE END has come, the discussion and arguments will still continue and I’m very glad to say that after the story has been told I’m not really that LOST anymore.

Namaste.

– Will Wilkins

PS: This coming week will also bring the final installment of the comprehensive and witty “The Final Season of LOST as Seen by Someone Who Has Never Seen LOST” and I had the opportunity to interview the author mere hours before the finale for your listening pleasure right here.

Soapbox: The Allure Of So-Bad-It’s-Good

soapbox-header.png

It’s Such a Fine Line Between Stupid and Clever

lucyline.gif

Friday night, I fulfilled one of my cinematic dreams: to see The Room live with its director, writer, producer and star, Tommy Wiseau. That this wish ranks somewhere with seeing a true 70mm print of Tati’s Playtime in a theater and meeting my favorite director, Martin Scorsese, strikes even me as odd. By my count, this was my eighth or ninth time seeing the film, and the second in a theater. Each time, I watched it with a different group of friends or a few converts as we spread the Gospel of Wiseau around the Southeastern United States setting up churches devoted to the vaguely Teutonic Jack-of-all-trades (or fight clubs; people react to The Room in different ways).

the_room

For those who somehow found this page on a geek-oriented web site and still don’t know what The Room is, I don’t know that words can help you. Clearly meant to be a personal, maybe even psychological, drama about a man whose life falls apart before his eyes, The Room features such bad acting, such inexplicable dialogue and such unnecessary special effects (such as using CGI backdrops of the San Francisco skyline despite being filmed in San Francisco) that even its creator began to sell it as an intended dark comedy when the first reviews hit publications. The only way to assign any meaning at all to the film is to argue facetiously for its stance as an auterial work of hidden layers, as I once did for a laugh.

Wiseau certainly figured out his role in the inevitable snowball of bad-press-as-good-press long before he showed up in Atlanta last night to present the film in-between negotiations with Cartoon Network for a new show. Not only does he sell that bullshit about the film’s “intentional” comedy; he also appears in the flesh – for lack of a better term – to bask in the dubious love of crowds of hipsters who have come not to praise Tommy but to bury him.

After a meet-and-greet, Wiseau held a half-hour Q&A, during which he insulted some questioners, hugged others, led a singing of “Happy Birthday” and even dumped plastic spoons – the faithful will understand – onto a willing fan. When Wiseau deigned to answer a question, his answers only heightened confusion and uncertainty, each response an ouroboric, self-annihilating cycle of incoherent logic and halting English. He responded to one individual’s question of the significance of cancer in the film by promising to “educate” the young lad, only to spiral into unexplored lingual territory before finally telling the kid to just Google “cancer” to get the answer. Then, a guy asked what it was like to work with Jessica Alba on some small project, to which Wiseau creepily and mysteriously replied, “Which Jessica Alba, the real one or the funny one?”

tommy_spoons

The crowd ate it up, paying more attention to him than their high school and college (if more than 10 percent of the people in the theater were old enough to be out of college), and the actual screening was an uproarious experience, the usual electricity of a live show amplified by Wiseau’s presence. Seasoned pros had dialogue and action down to the second, engaging in spot-on countdowns and shouting the lines as they were said, while neophytes basked in the mad insanity of it all.

As I sat near the front, pelted by plastic spoons thrown with wild abandon and screaming and laughing my head off, I devoted some time to wondering, as I always do when I sit down with The Room, why I do this. We’ve moved firmly into the summer block of movie releases now, a time of year only slightly improved over the cinematic wasteland that is the first financial quarter of the year. I spend my summers at the movies typically setting aside the five or six big releases that I get some measure of entertainment out of – from passive enjoyment to the one or two releases I rave about – from the wave of derivative franchise films and failed attempts to launch new franchises that stem primarily from a source material or from so many clichŽs and tropes that the word “original” does not automatically come to mind.

Why then, spend my time with films that go beyond the unremarkable and passively offensive detritus of the mainstream into the realm of true tastelessness? There are plenty of great films being made in this country, to say nothing of the rest of the world, on a yearly basis, and I could be devoting more time to tracking down limited distribution and belated DVD releases than returning over and over again to the casual misogyny of The Room and Manos: The Hands of Fate or the staggering inanity of Night Train to Mundo Fine. What grabs me?

torgo

Well, for one thing, I’m not typically disposed toward tearing apart independent artists*, as everyone deserves the chance to mess up and learn through error at first, particularly those working outside the studio system. With the term “indie movie” having taken on the same meaning as “indie rock” – that is to say a definable aesthetic over a true lack of mainstream distribution – the ambition it takes to go out and raise the money and the crew oneself should be acknowledged even if the finished product should be put in a safe and then dumped in the sea.

But that does not account for why I can so ardently get behind these movies. The most obvious reason, and the most perversely poetic, is that these bad movies**, hallmarks of everything cinema shouldn’t be, bring back a communal sense of the theater. The practice of shouting out lines, be they jeers or made-up dialogue, stretches back to the medium’s beginning, when patrons of silent films would make up conversations between title cards and vociferously offer their opinion of the movie as it unfolded. Now, long after cinema has established itself as the seventh art and produces masterpieces and moving baubles for cheap consumption, the embrace of pure, unmistakable garbage somehow brings the medium back to the nexus point of its divergence between entertainment and art.

As such, nearly everyone who attends something like The Room in a live setting enters with the intent to watch it “ironically,” to cheer and jeer before leaving with an ego boost, assured that even the poorest life decisions won’t turn out that bad. But those same people leave with a genuine, however twisted, appreciation of the film. As sarcastic as it may sound, the film really does bring people together, a deliriously fun experience that even the quality blockbusters cannot elicit. It’s no wonder, then, that midnight movies take up residence at arthouse theaters: they engender an earnest cinephilia, linking the intellectual, the pretentious and the mundane into one hollering carnival.

ed-wood

Edward D. Wood, Jr. The King of Crap

Also, to return to the independent angle, a number of these films show a passion lacking in “proper” movies. Take the most famous example of bad-good filmmaking, Ed Wood Jr. Wood’s initial work ethic and optimistic ethos, immortalized in Tim Burton’s biopic on the director (and his most human work), believed in the power of movie making. Wood wanted to make it, to be sure, but the excitement evident in his films, seen most clearly in his satisfaction with every first take no matter what mistakes occurred, gives the impression that the simple act of making a film gave him such pleasure that critical and commercial success could not have elevated it a great deal. (Only after people got wise to how bad he was and shut him out did Wood give in to a more bitter and defeated outlook.)

I would venture to say, though, that Wood’s films contain more than just passion,; many have surprisingly progressive ideas, especially in the push for acceptance of alternative lifestyles put forward by the transvestite director. The stiff acting that mars his films grates on the nerves, but it also breaks from the more melodramatic delivery of contemporary film. Bunny Breckinridge’s performance in Plan 9 from Outer Space, in which he was ironically the only professional actor (save the footage Wood took of Bela Lugosi before his death), is so brilliantly deadpan that he practically opened the doors for anti-comedy in the movies. Hell, he could have fit in the early films of Michelangelo Antonioni, whose ennui-filled art movies stand at the opposite pole from Ed Wood’s sandbox. Burton clearly understood this by casting Bill Murray, one of the great deadpans, to play Bunny in Ed Wood, allowing audiences to see just how thin the line separating Wood’s ineptitude from talent really was.

bunny_breckinridgebill_bunny

Perhaps this is all an effect of the majority of cinema falling almost by definition in the middle, the sheer mass and size of the average obscuring the extremities into one horizon. But I can recite more of The Room’s script than I can of any of my 10 favorite films, and both of my live viewings of the film (and some home screenings with friends) trump any other theatrical experience for sheer pleasure. Ultimately, in a country*** increasingly typified by mediocrity, from its entertainment to its government, there’s something appealing about trying and failing spectacularly. None of these people made a film with tax write-offs in mind; they put everything on the line to do something they loved. Regardless of how terrible (and terribly funny) the finished product is, who can’t respect that spirit?

*The second main criterion of bad films taken as comic brilliance is that the film cannot be intended as a comedy. Comedy cannot fail and be subsequently taken as comedy, at least not without a cavernous sense of schadenfreude. This also explains why The Room almost certainly could not have been originally a comedy.
** The original midnight movies – the anti-Western El Topo, David Lynch’s debut Eraserhead, John Waters’ pictures and The Rocky Horror Picture Show — all had darkly comic moments and a tastelessness that attracted audiences of dubious character, but each of these films contains working elements, and some of them could be taken as high art, separating them from the bad dramas working their way through cultist hands today.
***Cult films do tend to be a curiously, though not exclusively, American province; only recently has The Room ventured outside the country, and even the British rock opera Rocky Horror enjoys more success here (though a theater in Germany is modeled after the film).

–Jake Cole is a 20-year-old journalism student at Auburn University who hopes to become a critic. He constantly updates his blog, Not Just Movies, where he garrulously spouts about film, television and whatever else strikes his fancy. In his considerable free time, he wonders what it would be like to know how to talk to women.

FREDagator: 2010-05-24

Filed under: Articles — UncaScroogeMcD @ 3:50 am

fredagator.png

lucyline.gif

A loving tribute to the “Get A Mac” ad campaign, and the reason why I love John Hodgman so much as a performer…

[ad#contestbox]

May 23, 2010

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Phil Plait

Filed under: A Bit Of A Chat With Ken Plume,Interviews — Tags: , , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 10:37 pm

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have a bit of a chat with astronomer, writer, skeptic, and blogger behind Bad Astronomy, Phil Plait….

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Phil Plait“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-phil_plait.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

May 22, 2010

Opinion In A Haystack: MacGRUBER

haystackheader.jpg

MACGRUBER

A mostly-spoiler-free, mini-review. (Don’t worry, I’ll let you know where the spoiler is!)

macgruber-poster-350

I really LOATHE the saying “just leave your brain at the door” when trying to defend the likes of Transformers 2 and films of that nature. The proper response is “When people tell me to shut off my brain and have fun, I tell them I can’t because my brain is where I have fun.” (I got that from Eric Lichtenfeld.) While that is a genius response to a bonehead declaration, I don’t think turning off your brain should often apply to silly comedy, even though most act like it should. Film snobs, net elitists, and message board trolls want every film to be Pulp Fiction or The Dark Knight. Genre, passion, intent, and goals are all bunk ideas compared to how much a movie looks to fall into the very slim category of what they consider is GOOD. It has to be serious, be dark, and most importantly not trying to have any fun. This POV can help to evaluate certain films with certain tones for sure, Transformers 2 attempts to take itself seriously, which in turn reveals its wretched hatred of its audience. How come this is also always heaped on comedy? Sure there are a lot of soulless dead comedies, made without passion or care.

However, is it a crime to be passionate about being silly, vulgar, and stupid on purpose?

Can you not see the difference between the filmmakers of G-Force, Madea Goes To Jail, Old Dogs versus those of MacGruber? Have you truly lost every single ounce of your funny bone to the point where something DEFINING ITSELF AS A COMEDY, starring COMEDIANS and written by COMEDIANS just makes your vagina fill up with even more sand? It’s a sellout piece of shit right? THEN WHERE IS ALL THE PRODUCT PLACEMENT? (not that the lack of product placement proves anything…but seriously, this movie had none, how is it selling out?) It doesn’t make you an idiot to laugh at something silly or stupid, it doesn’t make your degree of “taste” bottom-out if you admit that a film that isn’t “Pulp Fiction-y” made you giggle. Are you saying that Albert Einstein and/or Stephen Hawking never laughed at a fart? If they did would they then be stupid? NO!!! So please, take that clichéd stick out of your ass and just try, for five minutes, to openly laugh at something you humorless prick. (by the way, I was wearing a Pulp Fiction shirt to the screening of MacGruber. I love Pulp Fiction.)

macgruber_photo1

Every review, EVERY REVIEW, on the net is going to go to great detail describing the history of Saturday Night Live movies, the reviewer’s relationship to them, why they suck, and how Wayne’s World and The Blues Brothers are the only exceptions to the rule. Why? Yeah, it’s a character from SNL, so let’s compare it within and only to that group, does that fully make sense? Why can’t we just compare it to action comedies in general? I was very relieved to see the one review plastered on the poster “The best action comedy since Beverly Hills Cop.” It was a bit of a shock to see someone actually looking beyond SNL and seeing MacGruber for what it is, a movie, not only an SNL movie.

Classifying what exactly MacGruber “is” is most certainly a task within itself. A MacGyver spoof, “˜80s action parody, comedic drama? Either way, one thing is for certain, director Jorma Taccone, star Will Forte, and writer John Solomon love, love, love “˜80s action films. MacGruber isn’t so much an expanded sketch about MacGuyver’s doppelganger as it is a very direct (more so than say Hot Fuzz) send-up of 1980’s action film making. The twist of course being, what if John McClane, John Rambo, or Michael Dudikoff from American Ninja was a bumbling idiot who somehow slipped through the system and was known as the greatest warrior the military ever crapped out? The genius of this silly flick is just how straight it’s played. Will Forte and Kristen Wiig are the only buffoons to be had in the whole of the movie, everyone else, from Powers Boothe to Val Kilmer is coming right out of a dead serious action tent-pole. This approach, while confusing to some, actually earns the laughs in much more mature way, even when the laughs consist of poop jokes. I’ll admit to feeling like I was the only one laughing at a lot of the “ultra serious” moments, perhaps I went in with the “action parody” angle more than others, I wasn’t looking for a skit.

***SPOILER ALERT*** For example, when MacGruber digs up his own coffin, left over from his faked death, to get a change of his MacGruber clothes, in the pouring rain, whilst heavily dramatic music is playing, I was no good. ****END SPOILER ALERT**** Sure the piss and sex jokes are funny and well executed (for piss and sex jokes,) but it’s the quiet action-film-moments that I think will give the movie legs beyond its shock value.

macgruber-660

Is it funny? Oh hell yes. Forte is giving 190% of himself in every frame. I know the guy has his critics, but if you are someone who questions his talent, I say that is your right, but to question his dedication is a bit absurd. Kilmer plays an over-the-top villain with a subdued demeanor, his eccentricities are absolutely hilarious, yet won’t hit everyone’s funny bone as they are executed very dry. Powers Boothe, great as always, isn’t “hamming” it up for the camera, he’s dead serious as ever, treating MacGruber with a verbal respect he’s done nothing to deserve. Kilmer and Boothe, along with straight man Ryan Philippe are the rock solid anchors to the film and it works. That, alone with Taccone doing his best to replicate the tone of Rambo takes it a few notches beyond a compilation of idiocy.

slice_macgruber_movie_image_will_forte_01

The movie does have its flaws, a few jokes will fall flat for some, and there is scattered problems with pacing that keep it from being a completely successful “action” film on its own, without the comedy. The second stroke of genius is how they beefed up the character of MacGruber. The skit might as well be considered a ghost (a boner ghost?) when it comes to giving any feedback to Forte’s hero, and they didn’t let themselves become slaves to the source. It’s not 90 minutes of MacGruber blowing up. No, instead they turned him into something more than a buffoon, he’s a clinically psychotic egomaniac who, when pushed, actually gets things done. Without going into much further detail, there are several moments in the film, funny moments too, where you realize that Mac is quite possibly disturbed to the point of it being darker than you’d ever think a comedy like this would take it.

“Bob, is it worth the price of a ticket? I have 7 kids, my wife just left me, and my arthritis makes walking feel like a bucket of nails is being siphoned into my knees caps.”

If you normally dig the type of humor on display here, if you can still watch “˜90s comedies and “˜80s action movies and be fully entertained, I say open your wallet and de-clench your anus for 90 minutes. If you hate it, I give you full permission to send me novel-length hate mail every day for the next 10 years without a single complaint from this side of the screen (as long as you’re cool with letting me post the letters under a section of my column entitled “SEARING HATRED FROM THE UNDERSEXED.”)

That’s all for MacGruber from me, Thanks for reading, and please send all hatred to the comments section below. Please Note: the preferred format of hate comments is that of Haiku, experimental limericks, and/or nonsensical mountain-man-speak with heavy cursing.

Oh and don’t forget to check out my sponsor:

This message brought to you by BLIGGY’S BORK CHUNKS, The only chunks with more sodium than Bork Strips.

May 21, 2010

FREDagator: 2010-05-21

Filed under: Articles — UncaScroogeMcD @ 5:00 pm

fredagator.png

lucyline.gif

Brilliant time-lapse photo of a Space Shuttle launch…

Wolves – Now with auto-tune…

[ad#contestbox]

Soapbox: Finding Your R Spot

Filed under: Articles — Tags: , , — Aaron @ 1:31 pm

soapbox-header.png

How To Pick The Best Place To Read

lucyline.gif

aa20reading20owlI’m going to take a slight sidestep with this week’s article, because instead of looking at books, I am going to look at the reader. And more specifically, where a reader devours books, and what makes that space so special.

Now, I’m not claiming to tell people where the best place to read is, because that sort of thing is purely subjective. What works for some may not for others, as my own experiences will show you. However, in order to comfortably and easily read books, there are a few elements that are essential. And for many people, they have one place that is their “reading spot”, where they go solely for the purposes of reading.

The seat

I use the word “seat” merely because it’s the easiest to describe what I mean. This doesn’t mean chair exclusively, because I know many people who choose not to sit in a chair. Some people may find an old log, a bean bag, or even their bed as the comfiest place to rip through a few chapters.

What I have learned, through sometimes painful experience, is that you need a bit of support from what you lie or sit on, especially if you are planning a marathon reading session. Something that will offer your back a bit of support, but is also cushioned enough to be comfortable for hours at a time. That’s why I’ve always wondered why schools use those butt-aching plastic chairs for pupils. Surely they aren’t conducive to creating a productive working environment?

For me it’s my couch. Yes it’s not very exciting, and in fact, completely obvious, but I honestly don’t enjoy reading anywhere else as much. This is because of one of my requirements: I have to be able to put my feet up, either tucked behind my bum, or on the coffee table (yes children, when you are a grown up you are allowed to put your feet on the furniture!!) or stretched out, practically lying down (as long as the cat hasn’t comandeered the other end). And it has an arm, another of my must-haves. I am quite a lazy person, and the thought of holding a book in front of me for several hours makes me tired, let alone actually doing it. But I find having an arm to rest my elbow on takes away some of the fatigue long time reading can bring.

And couches are comfortable. They are designed to be sat on by people for long periods of time, so have cushioning but underneath firm frames that stop your back from giving out.

But I have a friend who swears by reading at the bottom of an oak tree. He has a specific tree (god help the council if they ever decide to chop it down!!), which he feels has the exact right grooves in the trunk into which he fits. He assures me that it is the most enjoyable place he reads, but to me, the thought of leaning against a solid hardwood doesn’t make me think good thoughts. (No comments from the cheap seats please.)

The key to a good seat: Am I comfortable and supported?

The lighting

How many of us can honestly say they have NEVER attempted to read a book in bad light? Be it trying to get a chapter finished before the sun goes down, or reading by torchlight under your duvet when your mum’s told you it’s time for bed. Or have you tried to create a romantic, ambient setting to match your current Mills and Boon by lighting candles around the room? Every single one of these examples is bad for your eyes and can stop you from reading as much as you would like because your eyes get tired from squinting or you end up with a headache.

Ideally, wherever you read should have a clear and bright light source. If you are outside, this may result in you having to move indoors as the sun sets, or if you are lucky enough to have a front or back porch to sit on, invest in some lighting you can put on at dusk. Indoors, a lamp next to your reading space or a central light is essential.

I myself don’t like direct light shining on my book, so I have a light shade that throws the light upwards and away from the page. For me, having a light shining straight onto the text makes it too bright (I’m one of the many who has a degree of light sensitivity in my eyes, so too much brightness can result in headaches that register 4.5 on the Richter). It also stops glare on white pages.

I’ve never used those little reading lights that clip onto the side or top of the book and illuminate the page without causing a nuisance to your bedmate or fellow passenger on public transport, but I can’t imagine they provide enough light.

Oh, and another point, don’t be like me and attempt to read using the light from the TV. You only end up making yourself crossed eyed and having to go back and re-read everything the next day anyway!!

The key to good lighting: Can I see the words on the page clearly, without shadows on the page and without squinting?

The table

Some people may be questioning whether or not a table is really a reading essential, and I concede sometimes it’s not. However, for many people, reading involves bookmarks, coffee, maybe some cake, cigarettes or a nice glass of wine (my reading experience personally involves all of the above). And they all need to go somewhere.

For couch/armchair readers like myself, sometimes the arm of the chair does the job. But I have covered myself, the floor and the sofa in too much cigarette ash for that to be a good choice anymore. (Plus, have you ever tried balancing a wine glass on a circular arm? Doesn’t go very well, let me assure you.) And it’s too easy for a bookmark to slide down the side of the cushion and join the old mints, £3.65 in change and an old newspaper in the no man’s land under the couch cushions.

Or many people put their stuff on the floor. I find bending down a bit of a distraction mid-read, so for me it’s no good.

Nope, as mentioned earlier, I go for the coffee table, which can hold all my things and I can put my weary feet on it.

The key to a good reading table is: Does it hold everything I need and is it within easy reach?

Indoors or outdoors?

Ahhh, now here’s a divisive topic. Right off the bat: I hate reading outside. I’m not a very “outdoorsy” person, and I live in Scotland where it’s only warm enough to read outdoors two months of the year. I like the comfort of being inside, away from people, away from insects and most importantly, away from bird shit, as I have this long-running fear that if I stay in the one place outside for too long, something will eventually take a crap on me.

But I understand that other people feel a connection with nature and the great wide world outside the front door. And it definitely has benefits: You can work on your tan while reading, you are getting fresh air, and you can take in the beauty of your surroundings while reading. And the noises (a topic we will explore soon) can help you settle into the book. Oh, and reading in a park can allow for a bit of people watching (I especially like watching local footballers training).

The key to indoors or outdoors: Am I scared of bird crap?

The sound

Background noise can complement or completely ruin a reading experience, depending on what that sound is. The sound of workmen digging up pipes right outside your window, for example, isn’t the best sound to accompany a good book. But the right song/album/natural noise can enhance the experience, and actually allow the reader to become more engrossed in the story.

To give a brief example: I like to listen to the same album throughout a book. For me, I usually find an album that captures the themes or tone of a novel and go with that. It also helps me create a sense-memory aspect to the situation. If I hear one of the songs, I am taken back to what happened in that book. I did this with the Twilight books. I was reading and decided I need some music to set the scene. So I flicked through my iPod until I came to Dido’s Life For Rent, which I realised would fit in with some of the themes of the book (the album deals with relationships, the end of relationships, moving on, those sorts of things) and used that. Now for me, that album will be associated with the books, and whenever I hear it, my mind is instantly and involuntarily drawn back to specific moments from the book, and how I felt reading it.

And some people prefer silence to read. Noise can provide as much of a distraction as a tool, so sometimes it is better to just switch everything off and focus solely on the words on the page.

The key to sound: What won’t distract me, or lessen my reading experience?

So there you have it, my guide to finding your perfect reading spot. Ultimately, what the whole issue boils down to is what works best for you.

Please feel free to let me know where you like to read, and what you need around you to enjoy a good book by emailing alldunn_katy@yahoo.co.uk

–Katy Gordon

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Mike Phirman

Filed under: A Bit Of A Chat With Ken Plume,Interviews — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 4:16 am

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have a chat with one half of the musical comedy duo Hard ‘N Phirm – shortly after the debut of his solo album THE VERY LAST SONGS I WILL EVER RECORD (PART 1) – Mr. Mike Phirman…

You can pick up his new album at www.MikePhirman.com

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Mike Phirman“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-mike_phirman.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

Weekend Shopping Guide 5/21/10: We All Love You Gamera!

weekendshopping.png

The weekend’s here. You’ve just been paid, and it’s burning a hole in your pocket. What’s a pop culture geek to do? In hopes of steering you in the right direction to blow some of that hard-earned cash, it’s time for the FRED Weekend Shopping Guide – your spotlight on the things you didn’t even know you wanted…

(Please support FRED by using the links below to make any impulse purchases – it helps to keep us going…)

While the MST3K version is still near and dear to my heart, it is fun to see the restored original Gamera: The Giant Monster (Shout Factory, Not Rated, DVD-$19.93 SRP) in its DVD debut, sporting an audio commentary and a retrospective featurette. It’s a giant turtle, for criminy’s sake!

thinkgeek-01.jpg

Matt Smith’s tenure as the new Doctor on Doctor Who isn’t the only change that producer Steven Moffat has wrought – there’s also a brand new Sonic Screwdriver ($25.99). Gone is the rather plain blue-tipped model, replaced by a spring-loaded, green-tipped contraption with a LED light and sounds.

thinkgeek-02.jpg

One of the things I eagerly await is the arrival of a new volume of classic Charlie Brown & co., and The Complete Peanuts: 1975 to 1976 (Fantagraphics, $28.99 SRP) certainly doesn’t disappoint. In fact, if anything, things go a bit surreal, which Robert Smigel points out in his introduction. This also marks the halfway point in these collected volumes.

blankguide.gif

You know what other book always delights me when it arrives? A new installment in the wonderfully awkward misadventures of dim-witted detective Frank Burly, courtesy of author John Swartzwelder (writer of 59 episodes of The Simpsons). The latest is The Last Detective Alive (Kennydale Books, $15,95), and I suggest you pick it up at the same time you pick up the previous 6. Right now. Go on… I’ll be waiting for you. Seriously… Go. I’ll be here. Go get those books.

blankguide.gif

There’ve been plenty of young actresses tackling vintage royalty in recent years, but a gold crown to Emily Blunt’s portrayal of a young Queen Victoria in the appropriately named The Young Victoria (Sony, Rated PG, Blu-Ray-$34.95 SRP), which finds the inexperienced young monarch asserting her control while falling head over heels for Prince Albert. Bonus materials include featurettes and deleted/extended scenes.

blankguide.gif

There’s many a stand-up release that comes down the pike where I merely shrug my shoulders and say, “Eh.” And then there’s the new release from Reggie Watts, Why $#!+ So Crazy? (Comedy Central, Not Rated, DVD/CD-$15.95 SRP), which is like a laugh-out-loud reminder of what stand-up should be all about. You know… Funny.

blankguide.gif

With The Spy Next Door (Lionsgate, Rated PG, DVD-$29.95 SRP), Jackie Chan has been converted into a toothless family film star, a fate that befell The Rock just a few short years ago. In this flick, Chan plays a spy. Who lives next door. And baby-sits he neighbor kids. And stuff happens. Bonus features include a pair of featurettes and a blooper reel.

blankguide.gif

It’s by no means a bad film – in fact, Invictus (Warner Bros., Rated PG-13, Blu-Ray-$35.99 SRP) is actually a rather rousing tale of Nelson Mandela’s plan to bring together the fractured post-Apartheid South Africa via the country’s rugby team, captained by Matt Damon. Morgan Freeman is a stirring Mandela, but there’s something about the film that feels very by-the-numbers/Rudy-esque. Bonus materials include picture-in-picture commentary, a trio of featurettes, and the theatrical trailer.

blankguide.gif

I still haven’t figured out what I think of The Jeff Dunham Show (Paramount, Not Rated, DVD-$16.99 SRP) and the titular man behind its puppet co-stars. The materials can be crass and a bit too Carlos Mencia for my tastes. Bonus materials include an unaired sketch, a behind-the-scenes featurette, and a blooper reel.

blankguide.gif

A trio of cryogenically frozen astronauts return to an asteroid-devastated, rough-and-tumble post-apocalyptic Earth 150 years in the future in Gene Roddenberry’s Strange New World (Warner Bros., Not Rated, DVD-$19.95), the latest vault release from the Warner Archive Collection. Hey, it stars John Saxon!

blankguide.gif

What doe Tom Selleck, Yul Brynner, Leonard Nimoy, and Sam Elliott have in common? They all star in at least one of the three movies contained in Warners Louis L’Amour Western Collection (Warner Bros., Rated PG-13, DVD-$19.98 SRP), which contains The Sacketts, Catlow, & Conagher.

blankguide.gif

If you were to make the It’s A Mad Mad Mad Mad World of romantic films, it would be director Garry Marshall’s Valentine’s Day (New Line, Rated PG-13, Blu-Ray-$35.99 SRP), which throws dozens of actors into a slew of plots that all hang together into some kind of narrative collage dealing with love and the titular holiday. Bonus materials include an audio commentary, featurettes, and a blooper reel.

blankguide.gif

You know the Warner Archive is dedicated to fulfilling every obscure nostalgic wish when they release Kid ‘N Play’s Class Act (Warner Bros., Rated PG-13, DVD-$19.95). Yes – you heard me right. So all of those fans of HBO-friendly comedy and impossibly tall hair now have a purchase to make.

blankguide.gif

So there you have it… my humble suggestions for what to watch, listen to, play with, or waste money on this coming weekend. See ya next week…

-Ken Plume

##

Trailer Park: PULLING JOHN, YESTERDAY WAS A LIE, THE MESSENGER, GIGGLE GIGGLE, QUACK, RUNAWAY RALPH

By Christopher Stipp

The Archives, Right Here

Check out my new column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

The Messenger – DVD Review

the_messenger_posterWoody Harrelson is a human litmus test for what the ravages of war can do to an individual.

The Messenger is a movie that defies a conventional critique as the movie unspools in a manner that feels more real than it does made up, more visceral than it does imagined.  While Kevin Bacon’s turn in Taking Chance was a heartfelt swan song to one human’s life who died for his country, The Messenger is grittier in its portrayal of a man tasked with delivering the news no family member wants to get about their fallen soldier.

It’s grittier and more immediate thanks to the liberating decisions made by first time director Oren Moverman. The camera seems to always be bobbing, moving, trying to angle for a better position with which to see men like Woody Harrelson and Ben Foster, who finally gets a role that feels like it was written to play to his talents, navigate a world where there is no more war to fight. It’s the adjustment where the movie excels. There have been too many films to directly or indirectly address the battle that wages on between us and our supposed enemies but not one like this which addresses the human toll that costs many men and women their sanity.

The movie challenges you to assess which would be worse, fighting in a war and killing those you hate or ringing the doorbell of a stranger and killing those who you don’t even know with just a few words, and rewards you with surprises that make this so much more than just a movie about getting back into the swing of normal day-to-day living. Foster, whose behavior might seem strange, opting to don sunglasses in the middle of the night, or Harrelson, who can outdo Gary Busey in his prime for sheer scenery chewing, are a wild pair that completely satisfy as case studies for the silent deaths these men have to endure long after bullets have stopped slicing past their helmets.

The editing, for those that care about these sorts of things, allow scenes to breathe in a way that helps front load the emotional impact for what’s happening on the screen. For instance, when the duo is relaying the news of a soldier’s death to the father of the service member, played by Steve Buscemi, the scene is just allowed to play out in a way that not only felt organic but heightened the devastating impact the moment had on both characters. It’s but one of many moments that Moverman earns as a director looking to create a connection rather than making a moment to exploit. By the time Samantha Morton enters the film, as a woman who learns of her husband’s death through Foster, you are ready to crumble under the weight for what Moverman has already established. We get and understand the impact and you fully buy into the story that unravels between these people.

The Messenger is a film that not only deserves your time but, I would assert, deserves your attention and heart. It’s a movie that shows you what the ravages of war can do a man but it also shows you how that man can be put back together if all the elements are present; sometimes they are and sometimes they are not and it’s the latter ones that are completely devastating.

About the movie:

Co-written by Oren Moverman and Alessandro Camon, THE MESSENGER is a powerful and tender story about a returned war hero making his first steps toward a normal life.

In his first leading role, Foster stars as Will Montgomery, a U.S. Army officer who has just returned home from a tour in Iraq and is assigned to the Army’s Casualty Notification service. Partnered with fellow officer Tony Stone (Harrelson) to bear the bad news to the loved ones of fallen soldiers, Will faces the challenge of completing his mission while seeking to find comfort and healing back on the home front. When he finds himself drawn to Olivia (Morton), to whom he has just delivered the news of her husband’s death, Will’s emotional detachment begins to dissolve and the film reveals itself as a surprising, humorous, moving and very human portrait of grief, friendship and survival.

Featuring tour-de-force performances from Foster, Harrelson and Morton, and a brilliant directorial debut by Moverman, THE MESSENGER brings us into the inner lives of these outwardly steely heroes to reveal their fragility with compassion and dignity.

Pulling  John- DVD Review

pulling-john-3d-box-artLet’s just get this right out of the way: I was sold that Over The Top was the probably the best movie to come out in the winter of 1987.

There was something about the allure of Sylvester Stallone, still riding on the fame that made him the most bankable action star of the 80’s, in a role that was for all intents and purposes family friendly. That said, this documentary about guys who really do want to reach each other half-way but not necessarily across the sky, Pumping John is one entertaining film.

The movie deals with one man who has reigned for 25 years, a quarter of a century, as the all-time grand champion of this sport. And make no mistake, as you see these men train and internalize the nature of what they do, this is a sport. There are fans of this man and his legacy and you would half-think that the oddballs that the film showcases as wanting to dethrone the patriarch of the sport would be somehow a goof or funny. While there are some unintended moments that are humorous there is a real heart in this movie and I cannot believe it took this long to discover this independent gem.

About the movie:

A TOP 10 MUST SEE FILM FROM SXSW AND WINNER OF 10 INTERNATIONAL AUDIENCE AWARDS, THIS IS THE SWEAT-DRENCHED STORY OF A CHAMPION’S GLORY IN AN UNSUNG, OFFBEAT SPORT — ARM WRESTLING

A living legend in a sport he helped popularize, John Brzenk has enjoyed a 25 year run as the undefeated arm wrestling champion of the world.  Yet, at the age of 40, he’s consumed by one question: should he retire on top or succumb to the inevitable: a loss to a new champion.  PULLING JOHN, the rousing and universal story of a champion’s glory in an unsung sport, debuts this May on DVD in an extras-loaded version”¦only from IndiePix.

In the vein of dramatic, championship-caliber docs, Bigger, Faster, Stronger and King of Kong, PULLING JOHN is a feature-length verite shot over four years which follows Brzenk, the legendary armwrestler, who works as an airline mechanic by day and now must decide whether to leave the sport he was raised on.  Taking a journey to the far corners of the world where men define themselves by trying to beat the undisputed champ, the film visits with 23 year old Alexy Voevoda from Sochi , Russia and Charlestown, West Virginia ‘s 26 year old Travis Bagent, colorful characters who have been raised on the legend of Brzenk.  And, in a philosophical and thrilling ride through human nature, PULLING JOHN culminates at the Zloty Tur Championship in Warsaw , where Bagent and Voevoda have the chance of their life — to dethrone the conflicted champion.

About PULLING JOHN, San Diego City Beat says, “once you’ve watched it, you’ll be shocked that you’ve never heard of John Brzenk” and, Spout.com says “you will find yourself screaming out loud!”Â  Don’t miss out on this thrilling film, which IndiePix is presenting in widescreen with Dolby Digital 2.0 Stereo; also featured are bonuses including commentary from director Vassiliki Khonsari and Brzenk, a Pulling John graphic comic, over 50 minutes of additional scenes and more!

Yesterday Was  A Lie – DVD Review

yesterdayYes, when you read a description that uses the words avant-garde 99% of the time you should run in the other direction. Most likely what you’ll get is a movie that is so into itself it negates the possibility of anyone else liking it.

Not here, though, as this movie is a genuine treat that both entices and rewards on multiple levels. It feels like a noir thriller that ought to exist somewhere in the 30’s or 40’s with its mimimalist set design, cinematography and music choices. The story revolves around a hard nosed female detective on a case that, while it would be useless to try and compress into a neat paragraph, blends the scientific with the very mundane aspects of filmmaking that have long since been tossed aside.

While not steampunk by any means, the movie still feels like a hybrid of the very old and the very modern. Director/writer James Kerwin blends some fantastic elements that deal with the nature of space and time with a fun take on the old gumshoe who just can’t say no to the sauce.

Again, looking at the film’s description you would be hard pressed to want to check out a movie that seems like a blend of too many genres but I can assure you that it’s worth watching simply for Kipleigh Brown’s portrayal as the weather beaten detective Hoyle and for Chase Masterson of Star Trek: Deep Space Nine fame. These two together make seeking this movie out entitrely worth it. Kerwin, as well, deserves much love and respect for crafting a story that not only  works as a noir throwback but it also succeeds in bending your mind’s eye as it challenges your expectations of a film dealing with the subject matter it does. Such a wonderful outing for a filmmaker that finally does take a risk in a landscape of directors who play it safe.

About the movie:

Combining “stunning black-and-white cinematography, a sultry jazz score and a refreshingly high-minded script,” YESTERDAY WAS A LIE is a groundbreaking new metaphysical noir thriller from writer/director James Kerwin. Exploring mind-twisting modern sci-fi themes including the nature of time, reality and human consciousness, this acclaimed independent feature and U.S. theatrical release has received over a dozen film festival Best Feature awards and virtually unanimous critical praise.  This April, sci-fi fans everywhere will rejoice as YESTERDAY WAS A LIE, the latest feature from genre-favorite stars Chase Masterson and Peter Mayhew, makes its eagerly anticipated DVD debut for $24.98 SRP ““ only from E1 Entertainment.

In YESTERDAY WAS A LIE, Kipleigh Brown “exudes Bacall[2]” as Hoyle, a girl with a sharp mind and a weakness for bourbon who finds herself on the trail of a reclusive genius (John Newton).  But her work takes a series of unforeseen twists as events around her grow increasingly fragmented, disconnected and surreal.  With a sexy lounge singer (Chase Masterson) and a loyal partner (Mik Scriba, The Last Seduction) as her only allies, Hoyle is plunged into a dark world of intrigue and earth-shattering cosmological secrets.  Haunted by an ever-present shadow (Peter Mayhew) whom she is destined to face, Hoyle discovers that the most powerful force in the universe – the power to bend reality, the power to know the truth – lies within the depths of the human heart.   The film also stars Nathan Mobley, Warren Davis, Megan Henning, Jennifer Slimko and famed radio personality Robert Siegel.

Named one of the year’s “Ten Best Films on the Festival Circuit” by Film Threat, YESTERDAY WAS A LIE opened theatrically late in 2009 to rave theatrical reviews after successful screenings in over 50 festivals on four continents. The film has won numerous accolades including Best Director, Best Screenplay and Best Cinematography at Visionfest and was an Official Selection at the Barbados International Film Festival and the St. Louis International Film Festival, among others.

Presented in 16×9 with 5.1 Surround Sound, the YESTERDAY WAS A LIE DVD features English SDH Subtitles and is supplemented by an amazing array of bonus features.  Extras include a feature-length audio commentary by James Kerwin, Kipleigh Brown and Chase Masterson as well as multiple making-of featurettes, interviews with the cast and crew as well as a production stills photo gallery.  Produced by Helicon Arts Cooperative, the film is rated PG by the MPAA for language, some violent content and smoking.

YESTERDAY WAS A LIE will also be available for digital streaming in 720 HD on iTunes and Netflix. For more information about the film, visit www.yesterdaywasalie.com.

Giggle, Giggle, Quack and Runaway Ralph – DVD Review

giggle51j6rtjemyl_sl500_aa300_So…I sat my four year-old and six year-old in front of the television to watch the latest from Scholastic Storybook Treasures in order to get an accurate bead of whether anyone else in their cohort class would find this fun or at least mildly entertaining.

I took this as an opportunity to see whether they would enjoy the experience of reading along with a movie. Honestly, it’s one of the things which I thought would be a primer for their eventual exposure to foreign films which, as a cineaste,  I hoped they would enjoy as much as I do.

I’ll tell you what, it sure beats having to sit through an insufferable little twit named Caillou or a troubled chimp known as Curious George.

Giggle, Giggle, Quack is a collection of stories read by Abagail Breslin (Little Miss Sunshine), Alexander Gould (the voice of Finding Nemo and regular on Weeds), and Country/Western star Randy Travis is a solid choice for any parent out there looking to buy a DVD that you’ll at least be able to sit through and not count the minutes go by. Runaway Ralph, penned by the Ernest Hemmingway of kids fiction, Beverly Cleary, was just as entertaining to both kids as the two discs offered both long form and short form entertainment.

While Giggle, with it’s collection of five different stories on the disc, obviously appeals to the shorter attention spans of kids who just want brevity over substance you cannot go wrong. The stories are fun, are animated well and honestly do offer a literacy component should you decide that reading is somehow fundamental to nurturing a well-balanced kid. Runaway Ralph, as I could have suspected, appealed more to the six year-old as she’s learning to appreciate longer stories and is eagerly consuming works where she can read aloud. Now, for all her enthusiasm I think she’s just reading and not genuinely comprehending everything I at least appreciated that this movie sparked an action something other than drooling complicity as the television does all the entertaining.

As it is with a lot of kids, the collection of stories hold up to repeat viewings, and more repeat viewings, and even more repeat viewings, just fine. As the unwitting recipient of a multiple view marathon I can attest that after showing my kids the read along function they could not watch it without having it on.

The fact of the matter is that there is a dearth of good entertainment for kids out there and there really is only so much artistic growth that a show like Yo Gabba Gabba can engender.  It’s nice to know that, for at least a little while, these two discs kept my kids attention.

About Giggle, Giggle, Quack:

Spring into spring with Scholastic Storybook Treasuresâ„¢, as they release a new collection of colorfully animated stories adapted from tales by best-selling author Doreen Cronin.  Featuring everyone’s favorite personified animals, GIGGLE, GIGGLE, QUACK “¦ AND MORE STORIES BY DOREEN CRONIN includes adaptations of many of the author’s best-loved books and celebrity narration by Abigail Breslin (Little Miss Sunshine), Alexander Gould (Weeds) and Grammy® Award-winning singer Randy Travis. The DVD, which supports reading comprehension, vocabulary and problem solving, will be available in stores and at newkideo.com on March 30th for $14.95SRP.

The title story is the hilarious sequel to “Click, Clack, Moo: Cows That Type”.  This time, Farmer Brown’s animals pull their old tricks on Farmer Brown’s brother, Bob.  Duck instigates the action, ordering pizza with anchovies for the hens and renting “The Sound of Moosic” for the cows.  The lively animation and witty ploys of the animals will keep kids laughing, as will Randy Travis’ warm and humorous style of narration. Adapted from Cronin’s story and Betsy Lewin’s illustrations Weston Woods Studios original production captured an Andrew Carnegie Medal for Excellence in Children’s Video and Notable Video selection by the American Library Association.

GIGGLE, GIGGLE, QUACK “¦ AND MORE STORIES BY DOREEN CRONIN also includes four additional stories, animated from the original storybook illustrations of Betsy Lewin and Harry Bliss: “Dooby Dooby Moo”, “Duck for President” and the best-selling “Diary of a Worm” and “Diary of a Fly.” As an exclusive bonus, the DVD also includes an interview with illustrator Harry Bliss and Spanish versions of “Giggle, Giggle, Quack” and “Duck for President.”

Perfect for early readers, ages 3 to 8, the DVD features an enhanced read-along function and NEW Talk about the Story questions to enhance early literacy skills.  Children will also have the opportunity to hone their bilingual skills with the two of Spanish adaptations, which also includes the enhanced read-along where they words are highlighted as they are read.

The SCHOLASTIC STORYBOOK TREASURES series hails from the vaults of Weston Woods Studios, world-renowned for their careful film and video adaptations of best-selling children’s storybooks. Librarians and teachers around the country have long been using these very same productions, created by Weston Woods Studios with authors and illustrators, to enhance their students’ pre-reading experiences. Founded more than 50 years ago, and now a division of Scholastic, Weston Woods continues to produce top-notch video storytelling.  SCHOLASTIC  STORYBOOK TREASURES collects and presents these productions for the home marketplace and has, since its launch in 2003, become a top award-winning home video franchise for children.

About Runaway Ralph:

Beverly Cleary’s beloved and rascally character Ralph S. Mouse comes to life in live action DVD based on a best-selling children’s book, RUNAWAY RALPH, The latest in the acclaimed Scholastic Storybook Treasuresâ„¢ collection, this newly remastered edition of RUNAWAY RALPH supports reading comprehension, vocabulary and problem solving, and will be available in stores and at newkideo.com on April 27 for $14.95SRP.

RUNAWAY RALPH is the third installment of Cleary’s classic tales building on the adventure and excitement of THE MOUSE ANDTHE MOTORCYCLE and RALPH S. MOUSE (both available on DVD from Scholastic Storybook Treasures).  Ralph is tired of living at the quaint and quiet Mountain View Inn and dealing with his annoying relatives. He longs for “a life of speed and danger and excitement.” He certainly gets his wish when he sets off on his mouse-sized motorcycle and meets a series of fur-raising adventures. After some run-ins with the resident cat at the Happy Acres Summer Camp, Ralph befriends a young boy named Garfield and helps him through a difficult decision. In this fantastic tale of friendship and growing up, Ralph learns that the wild is not necessarily better than home, even with all its problems, The original film production won an Emmy nomination and awards from the American Library Association and the  Columbus Film Festival.

Perfect for early readers, ages 3 to 8, the DVD features an enhanced read-along function and Talk about the Story questions to enhance early literacy skills. The DVD also includes the bonus story Commander Toad in Space (based on the book by Jane Yolen).

The SCHOLASTIC STORYBOOK TREASURES series hails from the vaults of Weston Woods Studios, world-renowned for their careful film and video adaptations of best-selling children’s storybooks. Librarians and teachers around the country have long been using these very same productions, created by Weston Woods Studios with authors and illustrators, to enhance their students’ pre-reading experiences. Founded more than 50 years ago, and now a division of Scholastic, Weston Woods continues to produce top-notch video storytelling.  SCHOLASTIC  STORYBOOK TREASURES collects and presents these productions for the home marketplace and has, since its launch in 2003, become a top award-winning home video franchise for children.

May 20, 2010

Ken P. D. Snyde-Cast #148: Land, Sea, and Air Burger

Filed under: Ken P.D. Snydecast — Tags: , , , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 11:42 pm

snydecast-header.png

snydecast-logo2.png

Adult Swim’s Dana Snyder and FRED’s Ken Plume set out to have a literate conversation between two pals, but inevitably devolve into a verbal, and funny, free-for-all full of bickering, infighting, and the special kind of male bonding that comes from conflict expressed through the podcast medium.

Actor/comedian/raconteur Dana Snyder, you’re certainly aware, is Aqua Teen Hunger Force’s Master Shake, Squidbillies‘ Granny, Minoriteam’s Dr. Wang, and The Venture Bros.‘ Alchemist. Available for weddings and bar mitzvahs (bat availability pending), you can keep tabs on him via his website, www.eyeofthesnyder.com.

Ken Plume is the editor-in-chief here at FRED. He is a friend of Dana’s, as well as his arch-nemesis.

VISIT THE SNYDECAST EXPERIENCE

linesm.gif

KEN P.D. SNYDECAST #148: Land, Sea, and Air Burger – Ken & Dana return with tales of fast food madness. We dare you to try any of them.

[CONTENT WARNING]: This podcast may contain some foul language and horribly off-color jokes. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
Episode #148 (MP3 format)

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/snydecast/ken_p_d_snyde_cast-148.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

Got something to say? E-mail Dana & Ken at the Snydecast mailbag.

line.gif

CLICK HERE FOR THE SNYDECAST ARCHIVES

line.gif

##

TV Or Not TV: Finding Out ‘What They Died For’ (LOST)

Filed under: TV Or Not TV — Tags: — admin @ 5:49 pm

tvornottv-header.png

I suppose, before I do anything else, I should issue a half-hearted apology to the writers and producers of LOST for the harsh review of ‘ACROSS THE SEA’ that I put out last week. I only say this in context to having seen this week’s episode ‘WHAT THEY DIED FOR’ since there are holes that would have been left unfilled had we not seen ‘ACROSS THE SEA’. I still stand by it being one of my least favorite episodes of the season for many reasons but I can not at least see the logic of what they were trying to accomplish as well as the reason why they placed it exactly where they placed it.

If you have been tracking the number of special LOST columns that I have written for this season than you will notice that I haven’t written one for every single episode. My reason for leaving out certain episodes is the same reason that I almost did not write one for this series penultimate episode. It is very hard to talk about the elements of what happened in ‘WHAT THEY DIED FOR’ because it feels like both a lot happened and a lot didn’t happen in the episode. If I were to sit down and list all of the things that did happen in this episode you would probably think I’m off my nut in saying a lot didn’t happen, but maybe my perception is in the fact that we didn’t see much progress happen in the story.

THREE MEN AND A BADDY
One of the three stories transpiring in this episode was the tale of MILES, RICHARD and BEN going to BEN’s former house to pick up some C4 from his special pantry of disaster in order to blow up the AJIRA plane on the smaller island. This seemingly small and uninteresting story had most of the action and progress in it because the following all happens:

  • Before getting to the cabin we find out RICHARD took the time to bury BEN’s daughter ALEX
  • Right after getting the C4 the trio find their party crashed by CHARLES WIDMORE and the EVIL TINA FEY (ZOE).
  • Right after THAT party crash the party gets crashed further by LOCKE MONSTER (why have I not been calling him this all along?) who tosses RICHARD ALPERT into the jungle (with MILES having ditched the party in favor of living via a jungle jog).
  • BEN seems to turn coat pretty quick after in handing over ZOE and WIDMORE over to LOCKE, both of whom wind up dead shortly after WIDMORE reveals that DESMOND was JACOB’s failsafe should all the candidates get made dead.
  • BEN accompanies LOCKE MONSTER to the well where DESMOND is supposed to be but find an empty well and a rope instead.

See, lots of action? In the story we’re reminded of BEN’s daughter being ALEX since that will come up in the flash-sideways story also in this episode. WIDMORE and ZOE have to be there in order to tell LOCKE MONSTER why they brought DESMOND to the ISLAND as well as allowing their game pieces to be cleared off of the board. This gets them added to the pile along with FRANK (pilot the AJIRA flight) and ILLANA (get the ashes from JACOB’s death pyre) as characters who enjoyed several episodes on the Island to only fulfill one purpose. WIDMORE is also crucial to either prove to us through his death that BEN is vengeful and evil or just that he’s vengeful and hopefully he’s working the long con on the LOCKE MONSTER in order to simply survive this whole ordeal. I really hope that this is the case because BEN first seems to switch sides again when the LOCKE MONSTER offers him control of the Island after he’s left. By the episodes end, however, he says he is going to find DESMOND and use him to do what he’s never been able to do which is to destroy the Island. This naturally leaves BEN with a LOSE/LOSE situation so if we see him hanging around with LOCKE MONSTER on the Sunday finale it means he’s working the long con or simply trying to survive.

I think the writers really want us to believe that RICHARD ALPERT is dead. I don’t really know if that is the case. RICHARD was trying to use dynamite to off himself a few episodes back because, I’m assuming, that living after you’ve been blown to bits is kind of hard to do. Being tossed into a jungle like a wild foul ball probably bangs you up really bad, probably to the point where you wish you were dead, but RICHARD was given immortal life by JACOB wasn’t he?

During LOCKE MONSTER and BEN’s trip to the well it was nice to have the writers also answer a very simple question that I’m sure many a geek like myself has wondered. He asked LOCKE MONSTER directly, “If you can become smoke whenever you want why do you bother walking?” Turns out LOCKE MONSTER is the granola eating tree hugging type who likes to feel the Earth under his feet. Good on you LOCKE MONSTER!

CAMP FIRE STORIES
The second of the three stories that went on in the 42 minutes and 20 seconds of screen time was the story of the remaining candidates. They grieved over their sunk comrades, they started on their quest to find DESMOND and they ended up all finally meeting JACOB. It turns out that those ashes that ILLANA took from the base of the statue could be used to bring JACOB back one last time when burned in a fire (if I describe any more detail it comes off even crazier so let’s just leave it at that).

Even though HURLEY seemed to find JACOB in a matter of moments some how it takes him all afternoon and evening to finally get his friends back to JACOB’s fireside vigil where he finally let’s them know why their friends died and ‘WHAT THEY DIED FOR’. He cops to accidentally creating the SMOKE MONSTER almost 2000 years ago and how that LOCKE MONSTER wants to destroy the light of all creation at the heart of the Island, and that’s what needs protecting. One of them has to choose to become the new protector of the Island and hopefully dispatch the LOCKE MONSTER because the LOCKE MONSTER is going to be gunning for them. Faster than you can say, “JACK has been building up to this all season” JACK stands up and takes the job. JACOB says an incantation and gives him a mug of river water to chug down and then tells JACK, “Now you’re like me.” I suppose this means that JACK will now speak in vague statements and won’t be able to answer any question posed to him in a direct manner.

This is part of the story that had to happen but it contained the least amount of action and momentum. The torch was passed from one protector to another and that’s about it.

TAKE A WALK ON THE WILD SIDE
The third story that occured in under three quarters of an hour can really be labeled as the adventures of DESMOND the enlightened in the alternate reality. Flash-sideways DESMOND is still on his quest to open the eyes of his fellow Flight 815’ers. The first stop is to prank call JACK to let him know that his Dad’s coffin has been found. The second is to stop off at the school and beat the snot out of BEN. The third is to turn himself in to the cops so that he can be transferred to county with SAYID and KATE and helps bust them out with the help of HURLEY and ANNA LUCIA. His final reveal is that KATE is his date to a concert, which might be the concert that is being hosted by DANIEL FARADAY WIDMORE, even though I thought that was happening the same night that CHARLIE took DESMOND into the bay for a leisurely underwater drive.

The flash-sideways world, in many ways, comes off more like a love-letter to the long time fans of the show. After getting his beat down from DESMOND the very timid BENJAMIN LINUS accepts a ride home and dinner invitation by ALEX’s mom DANIELLE who insists he comes over, “even if we have to kidnap you.” His appearance during this invitation, after the beat down by DESMOND, is almost the same as… well… his appearance after the beat down by DESMOND in the previous season. There’s also a touching scene after dinner where BEN finds out that ALEX thinks of him as a father figure, where he subsequently gets all choked up and we as an audience all are supposed to go “AHHHHHHH.”

Another item that stemmed from BEN’s whoopin’ is the re-installation of faith into JOHN LOCKE. When BEN tells him that the guy that beat him up said he was trying to help LOCKE to “let go” LOCKE has coincidence overload and goes to see JACK to let him know he’s ready to get out of his chair if JACK really thinks that he can help him. This scene has a great call back to a line to one said by MR. EKO in the second season when JACK says to LOCKE that he is, “confusing coincidence for fate.”

I think the most important item of note is probably one of the most subtle. In the very beginning of the episode we see flash-sideways JACK in the bathroom noticing the same bloody neck wound that he had in the first episode of this season as well. Sideways JACK is the only person that we’ve seen a persistent wound on this season, he’s also the only one that seems to notice physical problems or issues with himself (remember the appendix question a while back?). I don’t think that this bodes very well for sideways JACK. I don’t know how and I don’t know why this isn’t a good thing for him but I think that in the series finale things aren’t going to end well for him.

ALMOST TO ‘THE END’
That’s really all that I have to say about this episode. After seeing this episode I think that there is a lot of story to still be told so I’m glad that the broadcast slot for the episode was expanded to 2.5 hours, especially since this actually means roughly 110 minutes of actual show time. That’s just 10 minutes shy of two full hours to have three separate stories converge into one final tale. I still have no idea about what is going to happen and I’m glad I don’t. It means that ht writing isn’t predictable, the story is unique, and the experience will be a memorable one.

See you on the other side.

Contest Round-Up: 2010-05-20

contestheader.jpg

Welcome to our weekly round-up of featured giveaways here at FRED. Every week, we’ll present a new clutch of DVDs, books, and other cool stuff you can take a shot at winning. All you have to do is click on the graphics below to be taken to their respective contest pages. And good luck!

In conjunction with New Video, we’re giving away three (3) copies of DR. HORRIBLE’S SING-ALONG BLOG on Blu-Ray.

In conjunction with Sony Home Video, we’re giving away two (2) copies of THE YOUNG VICTORIA on Blu-Ray.

In conjunction with Warner Bros Home Video, we’re giving away five (5) copies of INVICTUS on DVD.

In conjunction with History Channel Home Video, we’re giving away two (2) copies of ANCIENTS BEHAVING BADLY on DVD.

Win ANCIENTS BEHAVING BADLY on DVD!

Filed under: Contests — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 5:42 pm

contestheader.jpg

In conjunction with History Channel Home Video, we’re giving away two (2) copies of ANCIENTS BEHAVING BADLY on DVD.

Contest ends at 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, June 2nd.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of FRED Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

One entry per day, per person.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, June 2nd.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

« Newer Posts — Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress