FRED Entertainment

October 3, 2006

Quick Stop Thingamabobs: 10/3/2006

Filed under: Columns,Thingamabobs — UncaScroogeMcD @ 3:46 am
thingamabobs.jpg

The web. It’s a big place, full of plenty of distractions ““ some funny, some informative, some ludicrous, some disturbing, some inane, some profound. Each and every weekday, we present links to a few of our favorite finds”¦

————————————————

  • Somewhere, I think John Belushi is quite happy with David Cross. (Thingamabob)
  • I find myself overly-fascinated by the Frequently Asked Questions at a site called “Mr. Breakfast.” And yes, I’m man enough to admit that I found it interesting to learn how to poach an egg. (Thingamabob)
  • Speaking of food, the Dr. Pepper bottler in Dublin, Texas, is the only Dr. Pepper bottler in the entire country that still uses pure cane sugar to create their soda – as opposed to the wretched high fructose corn syrup that soda companies replaced it with in the 70’s. The taste difference is amazing. Order some for yourself and see. (Thingamabob)

Have a THINGAMABOB? Send it in!

DVD Late Show: A Bit of Everything

Filed under: DVD Late Show — UncaScroogeMcD @ 3:10 am

dvdlateshow.jpg

October 03, 2006

Still working my way through the titanic stack of review discs on my desk, so let’s not waste any time, and get right to the reviews…

blackstar.jpg

BCI/Eclipse, under their Ink & Paint label, have recently released BLACKSTAR ““ THE COMPLETE SERIES (1980-81), probably the last Filmation cartoon I remember actually getting up early to watch. I was into D&D then, and anything with a sword & sorcery theme caught my interest. Unfortunately, it aired in the same timeslot as Ruby-Spears’ superior THUNDARR THE BARBARIAN on another network, so unless THUNDARR was a repeat, I usually opted for the post-Apocalyptic barbarian over the sword-slinging astronaut, John Blackstar.

Loosely inspired by interplanetary romances like Edgar Rice Burroughs’ “John Carter of Mars” pulp stories, BLACKSTAR tells of an American astronaut, who, after passing through a black hole, finds himself stranded on the primitive planet Sagar. The planet is ruled by the evil, Darth Vader-esque Overlord, and opposed by a motley band of freedom fighters, including the sorceress Mara, shape-shifter Klone, and seven pink “trobbits.” John Blackstar somehow comes into possession of the Starsword, a mystic blade that can be combined with the Overlord’s Powersword to become the Powerstar ““ an ultimate weapon that the Overlord desperately covets.

Watching it today as a 40+ adult, I find that BLACKSTAR is actually somewhat better than I remembered. The animation still looks pretty slick and, oddly enough for a Filmation adventure show, uses very little, if any, rotoscoping. The character designs and background paintings are excellent, really selling the alien environment of planet Sagar. The scripts ““ mostly by animation and sci-fi veterans J. Michael Reeves (BATMAN ““ THE ANIMATED SERIES) and Marc Scott Zicree (SLIDERS) ““ are fun and fast paced. I still hate the little pink “trobbits,” though, and prefer the episodes that play down their child-friendly antics.

BCI’s DVD full-frame transfers are excellent; the source material on BLACKSTAR looks much better than the prints used on their previous FLASH GORDON set, with bright colors and virtually no visible debris or damage. Extras include an informative booklet of liner notes, writer and producer commentaries on two episodes, on-screen interviews with many of the creators of the show, two image galleries, and “The Magic of Filmation” documentary.

If you’re nostalgic and want to revisit your childhood ““ or know kids who are into fantasy adventure ““ BLACKSTAR ““ THE COMPLETE SERIES is well worth picking up.

captainpirate.jpg

Obviously intended to play off of Disney’s PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN sequel, comes Sony’s “Midnight Movies” double feature FORTUNES OF CAPTAIN BLOOD/CAPTAIN PIRATE (1950/1952), two low budget Columbia “epics” starring Louis Hayward (THE MAN IN THE IRON MASK).

Based on the same Rafael Sabatini source novel as the Errol Flynn classic, FORTUNES OF CAPTAIN BLOOD chronicles the adventures of Captain Peter Blood, a physician who is branded a traitor by the English Crown and sold into slavery. Escaping from his masters, he turns to piracy on the high seas with a crew of former slaves. Hayward makes a suitably dashing hero and pretty Patricia Medina is convincing as the love of his lawless life. Shot in black & white on the Columbia backlot, FORTUNES is nonetheless an exciting little swashbuckler, with enough swordplay, derring-do and tongue-in-cheek wit to make for an enjoyable Sunday afternoon viewing.

The sequel, CAPTAIN PIRATE, takes a place a few years after the first. Blood has retired from piracy and about to get married, when a pirate imposter starts committing terrible atrocities in his name. Blood quickly reforms his crew and sets sail again in an effort to clear his reputation. Made two years later in color, with Hayward and Medina reprising their roles, CAPTAIN PIRATE is not only a worthy sequel, but an entertaining, family-friendly adventure in its own right.

Packaged as part of the “Midnight Movies” line (although these are really more like Saturday Matinee flicks) Sony has presented these two films on individual single-sided discs, in clean, sharp 1.33:1 full-frame transfers, which appear to be the original screen ratios. There are no extras aside from the usual optional English, Japanese, Portuguese and Spanish subtitles.

Two fun pirate films for one low price, in a high-quality (if no-frills) presentation. If it sounds like your cup of grog, how can you resist?

felicity.jpg

As a follow-up to their first erotic DVD release, GWENDOLINE, Severin Films has brought to DVD another single-named softcore classic, FELICITY (1979).

This 1979 film, written and directed by John Lamond, chronicles the sexual awakening of a young Catholic schoolgirl as she spends an exotic and erotic summer in Hong Kong, experiencing all manner of sensual pleasures, including masturbation, voyeurism, bisexuality, and, eventually, romantic love.

Starring a lovely and luscious young Canadian actress named Glory Annen, FELICITY is a tasteful and well-made film, beautifully photographed and edited. The Hong Kong location footage is extraordinary, truly giving the film an exotic feel, and the sex scenes are all sensual and scalding hot. Annen’s performance is natural and unaffected, carrying the essentially plotless film effortlessly on the strength of her natural charm (and charms).

Severin’s region-free disc provides a crystal sharp 1.85:1 anamorphic widescreen transfer and a Dolby Digital mono soundtrack. The film is presented uncut, with footage never before seen in the U.S. Extras include a better-than-average commentary track with writer/director Lamond and star Annen, the original theatrical trailer and a sexy still gallery.

If you’re looking for an erotic film that you can watch with your significant other, FELICITY is a good choice, with a sensitive yet sexually-charged storyline, an appealing heroine, and a minimum of sleaze. Highly recommended.

norliss.jpg

Back in the early Seventies, the king of TV horror was Dan Curtis. His reign began with his successful gothic soap opera DARK SHADOWS, and was cemented with two TV movies starring Darren McGavin as reporter Carl Kolchak, THE NIGHT STALKER and the NIGHT STRANGLER. McGavin went on to reprise the role in a short-lived series without Curtis’ participation, and in response (it seems) Curtis attempted to launch another, similar franchise.

Anchor Bay is about to release on DVD ““ in fact, for the first time ever on video, as far as I can determine ““ Curtis’ 1973 TV movie, THE NORLISS TAPES.

This obvious pilot film starred Roy Thinnes (THE INVADERS, THE X-FILES) as David Norliss, a San Francisco investigative reporter working on a book debunking the supernatural. A year after taking the publisher’s advance, he calls his editor to tell him that he cannot write the book. A few days later, Norliss mysteriously disappears. When the editor shows up at Norliss’ home looking for him, he instead finds a pile of numbered cassette tapes. Playing the first one, he hears Norliss relate a terrifying story about his investigation of strange events in Carmel County involving a wealthy widow, her apparently undead spouse, a strange sculpture, and some bloodless corpses….

The movie plays out very much like Curtis’ NIGHT STALKER telefilms, with first-person narration by an investigator who is at first a skeptic, but soon caught up in unexplainable events. William F. Nolan’s teleplay follows the same structure and beats of Richard Matheson’s STALKER scripts, the minimalist musical score is again provided by Robert Cobert, and Curtis has even cast Claude Akins in a lawman role nearly identical to the one he played in the original Kolchak movie.

The biggest difference though, is that THE NORLISS TAPES is essentially humorless. Thinnes’ David Norliss is obviously a very serious, brooding sort of guy, where Darren McGavin’s Carl Kolchak was a wise-cracking wiseass with a lot of charm. This may have hurt the pilot’s chances of becoming a series back in the early Seventies. On the plus side, though, THE NORLISS TAPES co-stars the 1973-model Angie Dickinson (BIG BAD MAMA), and that’s a very good thing.

The DVD (which goes on sale today), is a bare-bones affair with a sharp, full-frame (the original aspect ratio) transfer, mono sound and a few trailers for other Anchor Bay/20th Century Fox horror titles. The transfer is solid and clean, and looks fine; the mono soundtrack is clear and strong.

While not quite as memorable as the NIGHT STALKER films, THE NORLISS TAPES does have a good, original story and an intriguing set-up. Too bad there was never a series or sequels. And since it rarely airs on TV anymore (outside occasional showings on Fox Movie Channel) it’s great to have it on DVD.

stayaliveunrated.jpg

Buena Vista recently sent me a copy of one of their latest teen horror flicks, STAY ALIVE (2006), and while it’s no classic, I found it entertaining.

The premise is that there’s this “underground” survival/horror video game, called ““ you guessed it ““ Stay Alive, and if you play it, you unleash the evil of the game story into the real world. Even worse ““ as the ad copy makes explicit ““ if you die in the game, you suffer the same fatal fate in reality, at the hands of the Blood Countess.

The nonsensical story incorporates (and takes great liberties with) the legend of Countess Elizabeth Bathory, who, so obsessed with maintaining her youth and beauty, took to slaughtering female virgins and bathing in their blood. According to the film, the Countess apparently fled Europe for the American South, where she resumed her sanguinary beauty treatments at a local plantation. It is this plantation that is the setting for the video game.

The cast is made up of your usual group of attractive, young twenty-somethings. The only face that was familiar to me was Agent Cody Banks himself, Frankie Muniz, as one of the die-hard gamers who uncover the game’s sinister secret.

Sure, the dialogue is cheesy, the story logic lacking, and you don’t have to have seen as many horror movies as I have to figure out by the end of the first act which characters are going to die and which are going to survive, but it’s fairly well acted (as these kinds of flicks go) and the direction by William Brent Bell is basically competent and occasionally suspenseful.

STAY ALIVE is available in two different DVD editions ““ as a full-frame, PG-13 version which not only cuts out almost all of the (already minimal) gore and profanity, not to mention nearly half of the picture, and an unrated, 2.35:1 anamorphic widescreen version. Obviously, the unrated, widescreen edition is the preferable one. Bonus features include a filmmaker commentary with the director, a Visual Effects featurette and an interactive game that you can play with the disc menus and your remote control.

Not a great horror film by any stretch, but I found it entertaining, and will probably watch it again one of these days. You might find it worth a rental, if you’re feeling undemanding.

devilsrain2.jpg

Ida Lupino. Tom Skerrit. John Travolta. William Shatner. Eddie Albert. Ernest Bognine. Only one Seventies Satanism screamer can claim all of those worthies in its cast, and that’s the perennial drive-in and late night TV classic, THE DEVIL’S RAIN (1975) ““ the only devil-worship shocker with real-life Church of Satan founder Anton LaVey as technical advisor!

Directed by Robert Fuest (THE ABOMINABLE DR. FIBES), RAIN is an entertaining, old-fashioned horror thriller, light on logic, but full of cool imagery and PG chills. Hollywood legend Lupino is the matriarch of a family that possesses a book coveted by a Satan-worshipping coven led by Borgnine. When Lupino, her eldest son (Shatner) and the book all go missing, little brother Tom Skerrit heads for a desert ghost town in search of them. There he finds a cult of robed, eyeless devil worshippers (including a very young Travolta) hanging out in a de-consecrated church and a big jug full of stolen souls. With the aid of college professor Eddie Albert, Skerrit attempts to free the souls and rescue his family from the cult.

It’s a lot of fun, if a bit tame by today’s standards. The desert settings are appropriately eerie, the visual and make-up effects are pretty good (especially for the time), and the ending still packs a punch. The performances range from good to outrageously over-the-top, which should be no surprise, considering the actors involved.

Previously released by VCI, THE DEVIL’S RAIN is getting a new lease on life from those wizards at Dark Sky Films with a new, much-improved edition hitting shelves on Halloween day. Boasting a superior 2.35:1 anamorphic widescreen transfer from a 35mm vault print (the VCI version was non-anamorphic and a bit dark), and sharp 2.0 Dolby Mono soundtrack, Dark Sky’s new special edition includes an informative commentary track from director Fuest moderated by Marcus Hearne, the original theatrical trailer, vintage radio spots and newsreel footage of Anton Lavey conducting a Satanic wedding in the 60’s.

Once again, Dark Sky has proven that they’re one of the top cult film labels around by taking a previously-released horror title and making the earlier edition obsolete. If you’re a fan of RAIN or Seventies Satanic thrillers in general, you’ll want to pick this up. And if you own the VCI disc, you may seriously want to consider an upgrade.

Recommended.

islandearth.jpg

One of the great science fiction films of the atomic Fifties, THIS ISLAND EARTH (1955), has recently been re-released on the digital format by Universal Studios.

Directed by William Alland (aided by an uncredited Jack Arnold of THE CREATURE FROM THE BLACK LAGOON fame), THIS ISLAND EARTH stars rugged Rex Reason and fetching Faith Domergue as nuclear scientists recruited into a secret research project by the mysterious (and mysteriously big-headed) Exeter (Jeff Morrow). Eventually the scientists discover that Exeter is an extraterrestrial (his HUGE cranium probably should have been a clue) desperate for new energy sources for his homeworld, and are swept away against their will on his flying saucer to the war-torn planet Metaluna.

Produced on a comparatively huge budget, THIS ISLAND EARTH was Universal’s answer to MGM’s lavish blockbuster FORBIDDEN PLANET, and the studio’s only Technicolor sci-fi extravaganza. Although the story moves a bit slowly by today’s standards, the special effects and scope of the film are still impressive.

The new Universal DVD is a bare-bones affair without a single extra feature and a static menu screen. The film is presented in 1.33:1 full-frame format, although, by most reports, the movie was intended to be matted for widescreen theatrical exhibition.

Previously released in the early days of the DVD format by Image Entertainment, universal’s new disc is a slight improvement, with a sharper, brighter transfer. Unfortunately the print used shows some minor age-related wear, some scratches, dust and debris. It’s not terrible, but one wishes that Universal had taken this important genre film back to the computer lab and give it a full-fledged restoration. Hell, I don’t even like the way the Art Department cropped the original poster art for the DVD cover ““ the design is off-balance and doesn’t even show the best parts of the art.

THIS ISLAND EARTH is a classic science fiction epic that still awaits a definitive release, but for now, this one will have to do. At least it’s inexpensive.

teenagemovie.jpg

From 1953 to 1969, author Don Glut (best known for the paperback novelization of THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK and a bunch of Gold Key comic books from the Seventies, like Dr. Spektor and Dagar) made amateur monster movies with his family’s 16mm movie camera. Of course, lots of kids made home movies, but what made Glut’s flicks different was that his efforts were frequently written up in issues of Famous Monsters of Filmland magazine, and later, publications like Filmfax, Fangoria and Starlog (where I read about them years ago).

I WAS A TEENAGE MOVIE MAKER (2006) is a documentary of Glut’s amateur filmmaking “career,” covering all 41 home, student and short films that he made during that above-mentioned 16-year span. From his earliest efforts, attempting to remake and sequelize classic Universal “Frankenstein” and “Dracula” films, to his later efforts as a film student using actual costumes and props from classic science fiction films and cliffhanger serials (courtesy of his friendship with superfan Bob Burns), Glut covers each short film in detail and shares many entertaining anecdotes about their making. Interspersed throughout the documentary are comments from Randal Kleiser (director of GREASE and Glut’s college roommate), Bob Burns, Famous Monsters editor Forrest J. Ackerman, Jim Harmon and even Glut’s mom!

The 2-disc special edition also includes all 41 of the films discussed in the documentary, each one accompanied by an audio commentary by Glut. There are also several behind-the-scenes bits, outtakes, and still galleries.

Cinema Epoch’s DVD presents the material in a full-frame transfer, which is quite nice overall, though Glut’s short films understandably vary in picture quality due to their age and amateur production. The packaging is slick and the material is fascinating. As a kid, I always wanted to make movies like these and never quite managed to make it happen. It’s a lot of fun to watch these now as an adult and admire the drive, talent and sheer strength of will that teenage Glut and his friends demonstrated in the making of these ambitious little motion pictures.

I loved I WAS A TEENAGE MOVIE MAKER, and it’s highly recommended.

A lot more reviews are in the pipeline for the next several weeks, including a bunch of horror disc reviews in time for your Halloween movie marathon planning: THE BORIS KARLOFF COLLECTION, THE INNER SANCTUM MYSTERIES, VOODOO MOON, THE LAST BROADCAST and more. I’ve also got a nice selection of drive-in action flicks, with THE SISTER STREET FIGHTER COLLECTION, 9 DEATHS OF THE NINJA, GALAXINA and KILLPOINT, plus some sci-fi television with BATTLESTAR GALACTICA SEASON 2.5 and my final FARSCAPE and ANDROMEDA reviews!

Comments about this column or DVD-related questions? Feel free to contact me at dvdlateshow@atomicpulp.com.

Nocturnal Admissions: Movie Review – Notes Toward a Review of The Departed

Filed under: Columns,Nocturnal Admissions — UncaScroogeMcD @ 3:06 am
nocturnalheader5.gif

I haven’t seen The Departed, and probably won’t till it opens (I’m banned from screenings of Warner Bros. movies), but I have been researching the film in depth. Here’s the why and how of it.

Why? Well, for one thing, it is the new fucking Martin Scorsese film, man, and that should be cause for celebration among all film students. And it is Scorsese where we like him best, in the mean streets among the thugs and victims of urban crime. Just as we all prefer Woody Allen’s earlier, funny movies, most of us merely tolerate Scorsese’s forays into Tibetan mysticism, Catholic mythology, and music history. Even better, The Departed is an American adaptation of a Hong Kong film that is masterly in its own right.

The how of it, in lieu of yet seeing the film, is to watch the trailer a hundred times, see the HBO making of, and read all the articles and interviews connected with The Departed. I haven’t caught up with the Jack Nicholson interview in Rolling Stone yet, but I’ve read just about everything else, in magazines ranging from Entertainment Weekly to American Cinematographer.

Infernal Affairs poster
Infernal poster two

More important, I’ve see the three films in the Infernal Affairs trilogy. I’d wanted to see them before the first one became a Scorsese remake project, but, you know, time is short and new films keep coming in the door. But this weekend I made the effort, and walked up the street to my neighborhood video shop, Movie Madness, rented the DVDs and then viewed the three films in a row. The second two films in the series were probably not strictly necessary, as I gather that Scorsese and his screenwriter William Monahan, concentrate on the first film, but you never know, and in any case, Infernal Affairs 2 is hailed as a good prequel, and some viewers think that the Godfather 2-ey Infernal Affairs 3 is the best of the lot.

They are indeed three terrific films, and if you haven’t seen them, at least do yourself the favor of seeing the first film, perhaps after seeing Scorsese’s version.

Good cop

Released in 2002, Infernal Affairs is written by Alan (Siu Fai) Mak and Felix Chong, and directed by Andrew Lau (Wai-Keung) and Mak, with Lau also pulling co-DP duties, although Christopher Doyle did the prep work on the film and shot part of it. And it’s not what you think. Viewers used to John Woo’s nonstop visual pyrotechnics and its influence on most HK films thereafter might be justified in assuming that Infernal Affairs is in that tradition, but it isn’t. IF is a scrupulously realistic crime drama. There are only one or two shoot outs, and they are conducted in a plausible fashion. Most of the film concentrates on the psychology of its protagonists, and confines its suspense to This is the kind of film wherein silence on the other end of a telephone line looms larger in IF‘s fearsome universe than bullets.

Have you ever seen a film that actually made you jealous? That was my reaction to Infernal Affairs. The premise is so clever, and has so much potential, surely almost all of it realized in the trilogy, that I sat there squirming in envy. But the film’s success is not based soley on the cleverness of the premise. Director Lau explores the mirror positions of his characters with cunning and wisdom. It’s the kind of film you think about for days afterwards, mentally revisiting the nuances and implications.

On the phone

Scorsese’s film sounds like an accurate account of the source. Stills from the film, the trailer, and a few early reviews suggest that key scenes from the HK version make their way into the new one. The broken cast, the meeting in the movie theater, the Our esteemed leader Kevin Smith, in his review of the film on Ebert’s show last night, even revealed that one of the best scenes in the HK version, when the two moles make their first contact via cel phones, has become one of the best scene sin Scorsese’s adaptation.

I’ve also been reading Black Mass: The True Story of the Unholy Alliance Between the FBI and the Irish Mob, by reporters Dick Lehr and Gerard O’Neill, their 2000 account of Boston crime king Whitey Bulger and his links to the FBI, as preparation for the film’s milieu. But that task has turned into a pleasure rather than prep work. It’s a great book of true crime, but I’m coming to realize that, although the movie is set in Boston, Jack Nicholson’s Frank Costello has only tangential connections to Bulger and his case. No for a cinematic recreation of Bulger and his environs one must turn to the Showtime series The Brotherhood.

Movie theater

The rash of promotional magazine articles has also filled in some details about this most anticipated of movies. Among them is the American Cinematographer interview with DP Michael Ballhaus. It’s a weird interview because Bauhaus admits to abhorring violence, and only consents to doing Scorsese’s films because, vaguely, “the way he plays those scenes tells you something about the characters.” Ballhaus is one of the few collaborators who will admit to having seen the source film (Scorsese and the screenwriter say they have avoided it) – and I wish he hadn’t. Everything he says about Infernal Affairs is wrong. Ballhaus says he enjoyed Lau’s movie, but adds that ” Infernal Affairs is a very fast-moving and stylish picture, but it has a very different style than The Departed. Marty’s version is much more character-driven, whereas the Chinese version [sic; it’s not a ‘version,’ it is the actual movie, of which ‘Marty’s’ is the version], while very good, doesn’t have the same depth. It was good for me to see Internal Affairs because it helped me learn what to do and not to do in our film. The original is lit very darkly in places and is rather mysterious, which is sometimes good. However, it’s occasionally a bit difficult to see the characters, and ti’s also primarily action-driven. Ours also has a lot of action, but we took a more American approach to the material.” To paraphrase Peter Gallagher in the great Malice, all due respect, Mr. Ballhaus, but knock it off. Everything you say is wrong. Infernal Affairs is well lit. If there are parts of the film so dark you can’t see the characters I’d like to know where they are. Does he mean the movie theater scene? And what does he mean by “mysterious”? What does that mean? On the subject of action, the reverse of what Ballhaus says is true. Infernal Affairs is character driven, not action driven. That is perfectly obvious. I suspect he saw Hard-Boiled and thought it was Infernal Affairs. How condescending of Ballhaus to say that viewing the source taught him what not to do. And what is this more “American” approach to the material”? What does that mean? Based on what American films in general do lately I would guess it means drain it of all interest and importance. It’s American movies that can’t develop characters of late, and it is HK films that have out-Hollywooded Hollywood when it comes to coherent, suspenseful, and amusing action. Infernal Affairs also showed that HK films have greater, not lesser, depth of character in their films. What a string of ridiculous, inaccurate, embarrassing, condescending, self-serving, and ignorant statements.

The interview with Scorsese in Entertainment Weekly also bothered me. Scorsese seemed disengaged. When reminded that he is using the Rolling Stones’s “Gimmee Shelter” yet again to kick off a film, lamely replied that, “I guess I’m repeating myself.”

But now that I think about it, the last several of Scorsese’s films have felt off, bloated New Hollywood films with good parts but an overall empty feel, even when the film is a lifelong dream project like Gangs of New York. Some of Scorsese’s best films are ones he’s had to be talked into doing, like Raging Bull. Does he not want to make films? Is he ambivalent these days? And why are his most recent films so much less like a “Scorsese film”? Is it the collaboration with DiCaprio? Is it the influence of the Weinsteins? Is Scorsese simply changing? Or am I not able to keep up with his work? Is it possible that Scorsese only has one great truly personal film in him, and he did it already, back in 1973, with all the rest the work of a metteur en scene?

I am hoping that all these doubts, questions, and fears will be put to rest with The Departed.

October 2, 2006

Spook’d #97: Extreme Lair Makeover – Souls

Filed under: Comic Strips,Spook'd — UncaScroogeMcD @ 2:41 pm

by Jeffery Stevenson and Seth Damoose with colors by Anthony Lee

Larger sized comic | ARCHIVES | OLDER ARCHIVES

Spook'd #97: Souls

To see Spook’d host Alastor’s blogging silliness and more fun Spook’d stuff,visit the Spook’d Web site!

Check out the preview to…

E-MAIL WRITER | ABOUT JEFF | ABOUT SETH | SPOOK’D BLOG | SPOOK’D FORUM | ARCHIVES | OLDER ARCHIVES

Disclaimer: All material in Spook’d is fictitious and intended solely for the purpose of entertainment. Names are fabricated and any similarity to real people or places is purely coincidental except in those cases where public figures are being satirized.

Quick Stop Thingamabobs: 10/2/2006

Filed under: Columns,Thingamabobs — UncaScroogeMcD @ 6:09 am
thingamabobs.jpg

The web. It’s a big place, full of plenty of distractions ““ some funny, some informative, some ludicrous, some disturbing, some inane, some profound. Each and every weekday, we present links to a few of our favorite finds”¦

————————————————

  • Relive the greatest Thanksgiving tragedy to ever grace the small screen. (Thingamabob)
  • This is our very first reader-submitted Thingamabob. You can blame him for this, after you regain the ability to achieve coherant thought. (Thingamabob)
  • Never, ever hire this guy for your kid’s birthday party. (Thingamabob)
  • Cyber-troubadour Jonathan Coulton has wrapped up his epic “Thing a Week” journey with #52. Go. Listen. Support a cyber-artist. (Thingamabob)
  • Sometimes, creativity should be feared. (Thingamabob)

Have a THINGAMABOB? Send it in!

Keneteph’s Korner: An Introduction

Filed under: Columns,Keneteph's Korner — UncaScroogeMcD @ 6:07 am
keneteph.gif

My Small Light in the Huge Askewniverse

Greetings Earthlings, the extraterrestrial Emcee has landed!  Some of you may know me from my music, the posts on the View Askew post board, or the cool shorts Mattt Potter has cut to some of my songs.  For those that don’t know me, hi-my name’s Thaahum (pronounced Thaa-Hoom-with a long ‘a’ sound), and I’m a writer and I rap once in a while too.  Don’t be alarmed though, it’s not the hip hop that’s played on most of your local radio stations, where all they talk about is how rich they are or how many chicks they committed various sex acts with.  Naw, my music actually has lyrics people can understand, and relate to (what a concept, music with a message)!

I gotta thank Kevin Smith for always supporting up and coming talent, no matter what their art form is.  I also have to thank the Editor-in-Chief, Mr. Ken Plume, for giving me the opportunity to have my own column on the site, “Keneteph’s Korner.”

So what can you expect in my part of the universe?  Well to be blunt – really good shit!  I’ll be featuring talented people in the entertainment field you normally wouldn’t hear about.  Sometimes you’ll have heard about them, but the articles will show a perspective on them the audience can gain something from.

The first article was on co-writer of the Occult Crimes Task Force (OCT) comic book, David Atchison.  He and actress Rosario Dawson both write the series.  I hope you guys enjoyed it.  This week I have a review on an urban poetry book called The Rebirth of Seeds by Renard E. Williams.

Some say I’m a pretty good writer, but you ask if I really got skills behind the mic?  You be the judge.  I leave you with a verse I did giving props to the crew I’m a fan of the most – Kevin Smith – Takin’ Out Sukkas.  Mattt Potter of View Askew recently cut a funny video to this song, which can be seen via the links below:

Quicktime – Large

YouTube

MySpace

Peace,
Thaahum
Keneteph Entertainment
www.keneteph.com

Widge Goes Off #14: Never Wed a Webmaster!

Filed under: Widge Goes Off — widge @ 5:54 am
widgegoesoff.jpg

widgepic.jpgHowdy folks. Welcome back to everyone’s favorite waste of time. Let’s do this.

[CONTENT WARNING] This podcast contains foul language and trans fats. A veritable shitload of trans fats.

DOWNLOAD: mp3 Format (30.9 MB)

As for your Monday Morning Quarterbacking session, I’m doing that in the podcast now. Only fair to those listeners in drivetime. Find the full skinnee at Box Office Mojo.

Mark Cuban vs. YouTube.

Cringely’s columns on the PBS site.

Knowledge Adventure’s Books By You.

Special thanks to Exit Mindbomb for letting me use “Godzilla Will Rule You” from their album Happy Accident for my new WGO music. Check them out on MySpace here and I tried to link up as many songs as I could here.

Widgett Walls is the chief cook and bottle washer for Needcoffee.com. He’s also the author of Mystics on the Road to Vanishing Point and Magnificent Desolation. His personal blog is at OneTusk.com, which he updates when he feels like it. He lives and works in Atlanta, Georgia. He hardly ever sleeps.

Party Favors: Howie’s Banker

Filed under: Columns,Joe Corey's Party Favors — UncaScroogeMcD @ 4:17 am
partyfavors1.jpg

HOLLYWOOD – Who is that mysterious shadow in the windows on the set of Deal or No Deal? Who makes the call to tell a contestant how much they can earn by just walking away? Who is the stranger that gloats when a sucker walks away with $5 instead of a million smackers?

Why it’s me!

I’m the banker. And I’ll be the banker until I have to return to my job as the guy who hands out MacArthur Genius Grants (that’s the reason I haven’t been given one).

People think it’s easy being the Banker on that show. All I have to do make a couple calls to Howie and read off preset figures. That’s only half my job. My other duty involves shaving Howie’s back between shows. It’s an ugly job, but I just love showbiz too much to give up on it.

The sad part is that my work is coming home with me. During my brother’s birthday, I offered him $20 to leave Aunt Mary’s card sealed and walk away from the cake. I offered a hooker at the Point $60 to leave her teeth in. I’m probably heading to the Monte Hall Rehab Center for People Who Just Can’t Stop Making a Deal.

KELLY LEAK IS BACK, BITCHES!

Is it’ f’n true? Did the big buzz of the Toronto Film Festival involve Jackie Earle Haley’s performance in Little Children? Is he really being fast tracked for a Best Supporting Actor Oscar? At least one good thing is going right in the universe.

After years of declaring Jackie Earle Haley the greatest troubled teen actor of his generation, he’s finally getting his due. The man who brought Kelly Leak to life in the Bad News Bears films, has grown up and still has the chops.

I have to pester my Oscar voting pals to make sure that Jackie is on their ballots. And if you have any, you better put Harvey Weinstein pressure on them. It’s all about Jackie this year. Forget Marty 2007 (although from the early word on The Departed, he might bag the trophy if Jack Nicholson and Brad Pitt can work the Hollywood voters and make them forget Marty as that little New Yawker who makes violent films), it’s all about Jackie Earle Haley.

I can already see Jackie’s name get called out, he rides up the steps on his motorbike, swigs down a beer, lights up a cigarette, clutches the trophy, points to heaven and say, “I got an Academy Award. Does that turn you on? Academy Award?”

How could Richard Linklater remake The Bad News Bears without begging for Jackie Earle Haley to be in the film? He should have played the owner of Hooters or a strip club. Linklater learned the power of Jackie Earle Haley since his version will not be beloved except by the same knuckleheads that think the new Rollerball is better than the James Caan version.

The Party Favors is rooting big time for Jackie Earle Haley and we promise to see Little Children when it opens in October – even if it doesn’t play at the Starlite Drive-In.

NOT GAY CLAY

The sad truth is that even if Clay Aiken was gay, he would only be the second most famous gay singer to emerge from Raleigh, North Carolina. Do you know who the most famous gay singer from this town is? Why it’s the Cowboy from the Village People. Yup. Randy Jones wasn’t from Texas. Although he went to the North Carolina School of the Arts in Winston-Salem, the home of Texas Pete hot sauce!

Clay really needs to do an entire record of Bob Mould songs. Enough with the showtunes that his menopausing Claymates already know. Let these women hum “Heartbreak a Stranger” and “Could You Be the One?”

SNOREBIZ SHOW

Why has Comedy Central signed up for another 13 episodes of David Spade’s Showbiz Show. He looked so bored in the last few episodes I caught while waiting for the tequila to wear off and The Daily Show to kick in. How can the folks at that channel want to endure more of Spade’s sleepwalking through his old jokes? And because of the nature of the show, there’s no real rerun action nor DVDs. What’s the point of making a cable show that can’t do those simple things? Think of how much action and cash Comedy Central has made off Chappelle Show. Although I’ve noticed that in the past few weeks the shelves are covered with the overpriced Lost Episodes. Expect to see it discounted for Thanksgiving – maybe even as freebie if you buy the other two boxsets?

They should have made a run at Joel McHale and the creative team behind The Soup on E!

Speaking of E!, isn’t it time for more rumors that Howard Stern wants to return his 30 minute show to the channel? Word is that Howard’s lack of profile outside of the pay radio and limited pay per view venues for his show has diminished his ability to sell the show. And by giving America a 30 minute sanitized version of the show, he’ll be able to attract people willing to pay to see the bisexual strippers without the bars blocking all the fun. It only makes business sense.

TURN THE PAGE

Why does Mary Harron take the most exciting of topics and sucks them dry of panache? First she does a film about Andy Warhol. And it’s about the woman who shot Andy. And it’s just hard to watch the nutty woman. Then she gets her hands on American Psycho. While I enjoy moments in that film (especially Christian Bale’s music reviews), it also lack that certain flare that elevates it to Trainspotting heights. And after 20 years of talking about it, she gets to bring Bettie Page’s story to the screen in The Notorious Bettie Page. And it just lacks the fun sleaze that this story deserves.

It’s so clinical and academic that it comes off as a Canadian production. Which oddly enough, Harron is. The film doesn’t breathe. It seems like a biopic that’s more concerned with connecting the dots than the journey of the line.

But I can’t completely trash the flick. Gretchen Moll finally lives up to her “next hot actress” hype from eight years ago. She wears those black bangs with authority. And does a great job recreating Page’s legendary poses. She looks stunning in the black and white view of Manhattan and vintage color scenes of Miami Beach. The film suffers when she’s not on the screen. Plus she looks good stripped down.

I’m happy I didn’t pay full price to see this at the cinema. It’s worth watching as a Netflix selection. This is a story that should have been a Cinemax After Dark experience. Damn shame Gregory Dark didn’t get to make it.

PBS PORN

I’m calling the FCC to complain about PBS’s recent Andy Warhol: A Documentary. While the images were rather conservative, I was exposed to way too much academic masturbation from critics. Each one had to spew a load of their genius jiz on the screen as they tried to explain Warhol’s work. This was worse then Janet Jackson’s nipple being shown during the D-Day landing in Saving Private Ryan. Filmmaker Ric Burns should be ashamed for letting these goofs jack off for so long. The sad part is that most of them were unloading blanks.

Maybe next time Ric can focus on the cinema of Peter North. At least he knows how to goo up the screen with a purpose.

HO HO WHORES

I’d like to remind retailers that you can not start advertising for Christmas until you have taken down your Halloween displays. Although you can sell egg nog while the Monster Cereals are still on the shelf. Nothing is better than a bowl of Frankenberry floating in egg nog. Mmmmmmmm.

AFFLECK CURSE CONTINUES

Ben Affleck is refusing to destroy the cursed baseball. He better do something this winter or the only present he’s giving Redsox Nation is another 80 plus years of waiting.

Nocturnal Admissions: DVD Review and Giveaway, Point Break: Special Edition

Filed under: Columns,Nocturnal Admissions — UncaScroogeMcD @ 4:11 am
nocturnalheader5.gif
Point Break box

I happen to have five DVDs of Point Break to give away, but more about that in a few ‘grafs. [As of 1:30 PM PST, the contest is closed, DKH]

Surfing

Point Break is, of course the surfin’ and bank robbin’ movie from 1991 starring Keanu Reeves, and directed by Kathryn Bigelow. It’s famous for many things. One is that it constitutes a woman directing a very male oriented action film. Another is that the film marked Reeves’s entry into the big Hollywood films, “betraying” his past roles as a sensitive and angst ridden teen or a hapless slacker type by becoming – what the fuck? – an FBI agent. Also, this is the film in which the bank robbers wear masks of former presidents. And another claim to fame is that one almost always says “Point Blank” instead of the real title.

Bigelow

But seeing the film again in its new special edition DVD release is a reminder that, despite its various small flaws, it’s a fun movie, with great surf footage. A weird blend of Big Wednesday and Dog Day Afternoon, it stars Reeves as, yes, Johnny Utah, a new agent assigned to the robbery division of the L.A. FBI. Teamed up with wizened old wild man FBI Agent Angelo Pappas, played by Gary Busey in just the way you would want, part of a large funny cast that includes John C. McGinley, James LeGros, Tom Sizemore, and of course Patrick Swayze as Bodhi, the philosophical extreme surfer-sky diver-bank robber.

Making of

One of the film’s flaws is Lori Petty as Utah’s surfing mentor, while he’s undercover looking for the bank robbers, since Utah and Pappas have determined, thanks to some pre-CSI ruminations, that the Ex-Presidents are surfers. I don’t know if Petty is miscast, or if it’s her character who is unpleasant or if it’s just Petty who is unappealing. In any case, PB is a great drive in movie, a little thin on substance and plot but rich in character actors, action, and simple drive in imperatives.

Deleted scene

This DVD supplants an earlier disc from 2002, whose only supplement was as a short making of featurette. This disc, the “pure adrenaline edition, has deleted scenes (eight very fuzzy video tapes adding about three additional minutes to the movie, made up mostly of quips and bits of dialogue), four making ofs (the 23-minute detailed retrospective making of “It’s Make Or Break,” in which almost everyone participates, the six minute “Ride The Wave” and five minute “Adrenaline Junkies,” both about surfing, and the six minute “On Location: Malibu,” in which two of the minor ex-Presidents revisit the sand), a stills gallery, and three trailers.

Point Break box

[As of 1:30 PM PST, the contest is closed, DKH] To get the a free Point Break DVD, be one of the first five people to write to dkholmcontests@mac.com. Please include your full mailing address. I won’t be able to write back to respondents other than the first five, so if you hear back from that email address, you have won.

September 29, 2006

Game On! 9-3-2006

Filed under: Game On! — admin @ 11:33 pm

gameon.jpg

Well, we went from one week of amazing games to a week of…well, practically nothing. I was expecting a few titles in my mailbox this week, but sadly, didn’t get a thing. Thankfully, Xbox Live Arcade didn’t let me down, and I’ve been playing the crap out of some old classics, while looking forward to the next coming weeks full of the finest games the holiday season will offer, beginning with next week’s release of SCARFACE. Sadly, I’ll be out of town next week, so my review of the game (and my subsequent interview with one of the voice actors, a certain Mr. Jason Mewes) will have to be postponned. Until then, however, let’s take a look at some old school fun, recently released on Xbox Live Arcade on 360.

DOOM

boxdoom.jpgThis week on Live, we saw one of my favorite games released, the OG of FPS’, DOOM. The classic PC shooter is back, featuring 4 player deathmatches and 2 player co-op, as well as fancy new upgrades like a remixed soundtrack in 5.1 digital surround sound and redone in High Def…not that you’d really notice.

The game retains all the finest moments from the classic shooter, finally adding dual analog control, as well as multiplayer on either Xbox live or splitscreen (two things that were sadly missing from the titles release with the various versions of DOOM 3 on regular Xbox). Also included is co-op, where two friends can battle the hordes of hell together through the main game’s story mode.

Everything is just as you remember it, which is both a good and a bad thing. While all the secrets and tricks have stayed, so have the muddy graphics. No amount of high def can smooth over those grainy walls. And while overall there is a new feeling of smoothness, it still looks like 1993. It plays like it too, with still no option to aim up or down, just hoping your random wild shots will hit those demons on the upper balconies.

doomxbox.jpg

Still, the online fragging is about as fun as it gets. This is the OG, and for folks like me who suck at pretty much every shooter out there on live, it’s nice to have a game that I can dominate in once in a while. While most of the sessiosn have been pretty lag free, there still are moments where the occasional hiccup does occur. All in all, nostalgia fans should rejoice with this title. Good shooting fun, lots of levels and a decent amount of achievements will bring folks back for more time and again, just like it did as shareware all those years ago. The only drawback is that $10 (or 800 microsoft points) seems a bit steep to play a game that we’ve all owned at one time or another (and mostly for free) but it should pay off in the long run, with plenty of extra levels and missions to add later. Can anyone say ULTIMATE DOOM?

One Gamer’s Opinion:

kickass.jpg

STREET FIGHTER II’ HYPER FIGHTING

boxstreetfighter2.jpgI know this was released quite a few weeks ago, but sadly, my Xbox Live has been down for a bit, so I missed this when it was first released. Still, I’m no stranger to the game. Taking the 12 World Warriors into battle brings back some great yet strange memories of my youth, and some of them actually aren’t that happy.

The main game is a true to the original as ever. Choose your fighter, then beat the crap out of the other guy using a series of punches, kicks, and crazy special moves. Gameplay works fairly well with the Xbox controller, but my kingdom for an arcade stick. Also, playing this again just reminds me of how cheap the game got as you progressed. Fight Ryu early on and he’s a push over, but if you don’t get to him until after the first bonus round and he’ll mop the floor with you. Lame.

sfiiscreen.jpg

The biggest draw here however is the Xbox Live multiplayer. With the all new “quarter match” set up, folks can scream “I got next” by placing thier virtual quarter down and playing the winner of a match that they’re spectating on, just like those arcade days of old. The only problem here is that most games tend to have a HUGE amount of lag, making timed attacks virtually impossible to accomplish correctly. It’s been fixed as of late with most games, but there are still times where it just gets downright jaggy, and therefore annoying as all get out.Still, again, for nostaligia’s sake, it’s a good amount of fun. I would have preferred a newer version of the game (more along the lines of NEW CHALLENGERS rather than SUPER SFII due to the crazy combo meter) but for what we got, I’m not complaining too much. Get a patch out to handle the lag and you’ve got a quality fighter that’s still king.

One Gamer’s Opinion:

righton.jpg

Short but sweet this week, folks. That’s all I had to review this time. Like I said, no column next week, but I’ll be back after that, more than likely with a shitload of titles (naturally). One man’s dry spell is another man’s tsunami. ‘Til then, gamers…

Nocturnal Admissions: DVD Review, Brian Clemens’s Thriller

Filed under: Columns,Nocturnal Admissions — UncaScroogeMcD @ 8:29 pm
nocturnalheader5.gif
Brian Clemens

Brian Clemens is one of those many prolific British writers who toiled in radio, TV, and / or movies from the 1950s well into the present, but whose aesthetic roots hark back to the pulp magazines of the 1920s and 1930s. Seasoned professionals, they liked tight narratives, solid dialogue, and cunning twists. Others in his vast and varied fraternity include, at one end of the scale or the other, Dennis Potter, who wrote many original TV dramas including The Singing Detective, and Nigel Kneale, whose career ranges from The Quatermass Experiment (which inspired Hooper’s Lifeforce), to Halloween III: Season of the Witch (recently mimicked in Stay Alive). Clemens worked in movies and television simultaneously, penning such films as Hammer’s Dr. Jekyll and Sister Hyde, as well as See No Evil, Kronos and The Watcher in the Woods. For TV he was involved with Danger Man, and later The Professionals. But for spy fans, humor buffs, and fetishists alike, his crowning achievement is The Avengers, that show that agitated the febrile minds of adolescents through the 1960s.

Thriller title

Clemens is also the brains behind the series Thriller. Not to be confused with the NBC series with host Boris Karloff that aired from 1960 to 1962, Clemens’s Thriller is nevertheless also an anthology series of horror tales with a twist, but different from Twilight Zone and Alfred Hitchcock Presents in that all of the shows were either written or outlined by one person, Clemens. Made for ATV, it aired from 1973 to 197x and comprised some 42 tales. But what would be a burden for most writers with Clemens seem seemed to be a joyous, easy task. Ideas just seemed to pour out of him. As he says in introduction to one of his tales, “The Color of Blood,” when people ask him how he comes up with his ideas, he tells the story of visiting Europe for a conference and being picked up at the station by a young student. In the car, she asked him the same question, and he turned to her and said, “How do you know I’m Brian Clemens?”One doesn’t know the fate of that young girl, but we do know the fate of the reply: it got him to thinking and resulted in the story “Color of Blood,” in which a bank employee unwittingly picks up a serial killer at the train station. The story has even more twists, but they shan’t be spoiled here.

Thriller box

A&E has now released the first season (of six, lasting through 1976) of Thriller, in a four disc set that hit the street Tuesday, September 26 (for $79.95), and would make the perfect Hallowe’en gift for budding Hitchcocks or Harlan Ellisons. Thriller collects the 10 episodes of the first season, with the addition of three interviews, first with Clemens, discussing how he came up with the series, the next with director Shaun O’Riordan, who discusses the techniques of staged, videotaped episodic television, and the finally one with producer John Cooper. Packaging for the set is good, with a nice ghostly yellow logo, a horrific image on the cover, and the discs in individual flat packs. (Several of the shows were retitled and aired on ABC late at night.)

Each hour long episode (divided into three parts) begins with a quasi-comical Tales from the Crypt style intro by Clemens, followed by a few screens of text trivial about the ep, and then a video interview except in which Clemens discusses its genesis and trivial about the cast. The credit sequence to the show features a haunting, Herrmann-esque theme, composed by Laurie Johnson, the same man behind the catchy, memorable Avengers theme. The shows appear to be a blend of 16mm exteriors and videotaped interiors, but the interiors might be multicamera 16mms.

Robert Powell

The stories themselves are a blend of Hitchcockian (TV Hitchcock, that is) domestic crime and creepy tales of innocents stumbling into a dire enviroment. The first, “The Lady Killer,” concerns a Honeymoon Killers type story about a serial marrier and murderer (Robert Powell), whose partner is the divine Linda Thorson (sadly underrated and denigrated as Diana Rigg’s Avengers replacement all because of her haircut). This show sets the tone. The dialogue is sharp, but there is also a feeling that it is padded out to fill the hour; there are several sharp twists in the plot; and the setting is rural and quaint.

Judy Carne

The third ep, “Someone at the Top of the Stairs,” is about two students, Judy Carne and Donna Mills, who rent a small room only to learn, eventually, that the house, the very house itself, is a malevolent entity.

Certain themes recur. Clemens is obsessed with blindness. The condition has appeared in several of his other works. Here it figures in one of the best tales, about assassins who take over a school of the blind because it offers the best vantage to kill a visiting dignitary. Clemens, perhaps for budgetary reasons, is interested in the small, out of the way rural areas that might harbor evil. He is fascinated by the chronology of murder, as in the tale, “Murder in the Mind,” and “second wives,” especially those who suspect that something odd happened to the first one.

Clemens’s tales are clever, but also comforting. They take their time to establish settings, relationships, and potentialities. Thriller is right up the alley of those who relish tales of suspense in the Hitchcock Presents mode.

Take Me Home Blog #10 – Blogging Is For Weenies

Filed under: Production Blogs,Take Me Home Blog — UncaScroogeMcD @ 3:47 pm
takemehomeheader.jpg

CLEARLY THERE’S SOMETHING WRONG WITH ME
I know, it’s been a few weeks since I last posted, but I assure you all it’s for good reason: I was procrastinating. True, I did fly back to Ohio, then to New Hampshire for a wedding, but the bottom line is I am a sultan of procrastination. I wrote an essay on procrastination that got me an invite to the Library of Congress in D.C.. No, really. My thesis was: DON’T PROCRASTINATE BECAUSE PEOPLE WILL THINK YOU’RE PUTTING THINGS OFF. It was compelling, if I do say so myself.

So what exactly would drive me to slack off so? I think I felt a little bit like I was letting you all down if I didn’t have something enthralling to say. It holds with my rules for this blog, one of the biggest being “I PROMISE NOT TO WRITE ABOUT WIPING MY ASS”. In other words, I don’t want to bore you with the day-to-day. I realize that the day-to-day is EXACTLY what a blog is a record of, but that point had been lost on me the last couple of weeks. Nevertheless, the black sheep has returned with a newfound purpose: TO CREATE.

NO, NOT LIKE GOD. LIKE KIRK CAMERON.
This site was intended to be an intimate discourse on film. While I don’t think it’s a failure in that department, I think we’ve strayed from one of the key objectives of me writing this and you reading this: TO MOTIVATE US. Si? So here’s what I propose: let’s make October THE MONTH WHERE IT ALL HAPPENS. If you’ve been sitting on an idea for a while, this is the month when you get it done. Brush the dust off that script! Call your buds! Set a date! I’ll do the same. Because until “Take Me Home” finds its funding once again, I’d rather have something to show for the year in waiting. Enough blogging! It’s time we made a film! If Kirk Cameron can do it (and oh man, can he!), then so can we. So let’s get to it!

SO EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENS IN “THE MONTH WHERE IT ALL HAPPENS”?
That depends on you. I am finally shooting that short film I wrote you all about back in Ohio. Now, because of actor scheduling, that won’t happen until October 30th. Which leads me to a bit of advice: give yourself as much prep time as possible. Yes, it’s a blast getting together with the gang and seeing what you can whip up, but keep in mind you’ve got a whole month (I’m discluding editing time. Just shooting something in one month is a huge task). But take the month to get it right: storyboard the whole film, study like-minded films, study how they’re lighting their actors, try replicating their style, find a good camera for a good price (to rent or buy), get your crew, get your cast, get your ass movin’! I am a firm believer in the notion that films are only as good as their pre-production.

Meanwhile, I’m going to figure out a place where we can post our shorts to share with each other. In the meantime, here are a few storyboards from my short, “Untold”. By this time next week, let’s have our shorts fully formulated and as taught as Joan Rivers face. Pass it out to a few folks you trust. Listen to their feedback, weigh it, and make any adjustments. But when Friday comes, you’ve got a rock-steady shooting script. I’m shooting for the same deadline. And we’ll take it from there. OCTOBER WON’T KNOW WHAT HIT HER!!

takemehome-10-29-storyboards

(Author’s note: The author would like to clarify that his last statement was in no way, shape, or form a promotion of physical violence. He would like to point out that “October” is actually a month of the year and not a former girlfriend. The author has a deep respect for all women, even the ones who set out to ruin his life like his fiancee and his mother. He thanks you in advance for your understanding on this matter.)

-Sam Jaeger

jaeger.jpg

Melonpool Quickcast #15: Sammy’s Apartment

Filed under: Melonpool Quickcast — admin @ 3:41 pm
melonpool.gif

-By Steve Troop

Based on Steve Troop’s classic webcomic of the same name, the Melonpool Quickcast features puppet versions of Troop’s alien cast, who are desperately trying to make heads or tails out of Earth culture.

quickcast15

We haven’t seen a lot of Sammy the Hammy here at the Melonpool Quickcast. Mayberry catches up with everybody’s favorite 220-lb hamster as he shows off his new residence….

Don’t forget to comment on this and other Melonpool Quickcasts over at the official Melonpool Quickcast Forum!

Mayberry Avatar Ralph Avatar Sam Avatar Sammy Avatar Roberta Avatar

Melonpool Quickcast #15: Sammy’s Apartment:

  • Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 21 MB)
  • Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 9 MB)

Quick Stop Thingamabobs: 9/29/2006

Filed under: Columns,Thingamabobs — UncaScroogeMcD @ 7:39 am
thingamabobs.jpg

The web. It’s a big place, full of plenty of distractions ““ some funny, some informative, some ludicrous, some disturbing, some inane, some profound. Each and every weekday, we present links to a few of our favorite finds”¦

————————————————

  • Have you experienced Zefrank’s The Show yet? You should. (Thingamabob)
  • Life is so very, very short – thank jebus it’s not lived like this. (Thingamabob)
  • Kangaroo fight! Kangaroo fight! Kangaroo fight! (Thingamabob)
  • If you’ve been living in the bowels of the earth, you can now see why everyone has called the final moments of Bob Newhart’s second sitcom, Newhart, one of the funniest moments in TV history. (Thingamabob)
  • I don’t know why, but I really and truly want one of these. (Thingamabob)

Have a THINGAMABOB? Send it in!

Ken P. D. Snyde-Cast #15: The Prodigal ‘cast Returns

Filed under: Ken P.D. Snydecast — UncaScroogeMcD @ 1:04 am

snydecast-header.png

snydecast-logo2.png

Adult Swim’s Dana Snyder and FRED’s Ken Plume set out to have a literate conversation between two pals, but inevitably devolve into a verbal, and funny, free-for-all full of bickering, infighting, and the special kind of male bonding that comes from conflict expressed through the podcast medium.

Actor/comedian/raconteur Dana Snyder, you’re certainly aware, is Aqua Teen Hunger Force’s Master Shake, Squidbillies‘ Granny, Minoriteam’s Dr. Wang, and The Venture Bros.‘ Alchemist. Available for weddings and bar mitzvahs (bat availability pending), you can keep tabs on him via his website, www.eyeofthesnyder.com.

Ken Plume is the editor-in-chief here at FRED. He is a friend of Dana’s, as well as his arch-nemesis.

VISIT THE SNYDECAST EXPERIENCE

linesm.gif

KEN P.D. SNYDECAST #15: The Prodigal ‘cast Returns – After a far too long break, [adult swim]’s Dana Snyder and Ken Plume’s weekly chat podcast returns from the road, eager to get back to a normal routine”¦ Which means telling travel stories, catching up on mail, and probably arguing.

[CONTENT WARNING]: This podcast may contain some foul language and horribly off-color jokes. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
Episode #15 (MP3 format)

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/snydecast/ken_p_d_snyde_cast-15.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

Got something to say? E-mail Dana & Ken at the Snydecast mailbag.

line.gif

CLICK HERE FOR THE SNYDECAST ARCHIVES

line.gif

##

Weekend Shopping Guide 9/29/06: You Blockhead

Filed under: Shopping Guides — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:47 am

weekendshopping.jpg

The weekend’s here. You’ve just been paid, and it’s burning a hole in your pocket. What’s a pop culture geek to do? In hopes of steering you in the right direction to blow some of that hard-earned cash, it’s time for the Quick Stop Weekend Shopping Guide – your spotlight on the things you didn’t even know you wanted…

Fall has come, and that means another volume of The Complete Peanuts (Fantagraphics, $28.95 SRP). The sixth collection contains strips from the years 1961 to 1962, and is the first volume that I can fully state that Charles Schulz’s comic universe had fully matured into a form – both in writing and art – easily recognizable as modern Peanuts. This was a span that found Lucy entrenched in her psychiatrist booth, Charlie Brown as the world’s most maligned baseball manager, Sally finally coming of age, Charlie making a habit of writing to his pen pal, Snoopy at home on top of his doghouse, and the return of the Great Pumpkin. If you haven’t been picking up these collections, catch up while it’s still manageable – there’s a reason why Peanuts became a classic so quickly.

I’ve been a fan of Scrooge McDuck’s adventures ever since I began reading comic books as a kid, many of whose stories were crafted by the legendary Carl Barks (who created Scrooge in 1947). It was natural that, as soon as it premiered, I became an instant fan of Disney’s animated DuckTales, which adapted many of Barks’ stories. With that in mind, I recommended to the good folks at Gemstone that they collected those Barks tales that were adapted and release them as such. Well, they took my idea, giving us two volumes of Carl Barks’ Greatest DuckTales Stories (Gemstone, $10.95 SRP), featuring a dozen classics from The Duck Man.

Without The Chris Rock Show (HBO, Not Rated, DVD-$34.98 SRP) to pave the way, I doubt we would have seen Chappelle’s Show. Rock took edgy, matter-of-fact – and deeply funny – social observations about culture and race and built a show around talking frankly. Through sketches, guests, and musical performances, Rock was able to present a show were anything went, opening the door for Dave Chappelle to truly blow the rest of the walls down on basic cable. When watching the episodes found in this 3-disc set collecting seasons 1 & 2, it’s interesting to see just how much slower the pace was compared to what Chappelle would later do, but there’s no denying that the material is still strong and quite funny. The set also features commentaries from Rock.

During the 80’s, running across and watching an episode of Mama’s Family (Warner Bros., Not Rated, DVD-$26.99 SRP) was like comfort food – no matter when I switched it on or ho much of the episode had already gone by, I couldn’t help but watch it. Spun off from The Carol Burnett Show and featuring Vicki Lawrence’s caustic-but-loving Mama character, the show always featured that old-school sitcom writing – always dependable for a solid belly-laugh. The 2-disc first season features all 13 episodes, but sadly no bonus features. Where’s our Mama commentary?

The more I watched of Comedy Central’s Stella (Paramount, Not Rated, DVD-$26.99 SRP) – starring Michael Ian Black, Michael Showalter, and David Wain – it gradually dawned on me exactly what the show was… it’s a postmodern version of the Monkees TV show. The trio room together in a Manhattan apartment and engages in various absurd, often wacky, adventures in the face heavily-caricatured authority figures. They are the Monkees, and I love it. The 2-disc set features all 10 first season episodes, plus audio commentaries, Comedy Central Presents: Stella, deleted scenes, a history of Stella, and a blooper reel.

If Rushmore‘s Max Fischer had been more inclined towards becoming a stand-up rather than a filmmaker, then he probably would have an act and delivery like Demetri Martin’s. As dry as Steven Wright and as skewed as Mitch Hedberg, his comedy is definitely a grower, but once you get swept up in the absurd observations and view of reality, it’s definitely worth the ride. See if you agree by picking up Demetri Martin: These Are Jokes (Comedy Central Records, $15.98 SRP), containing not only his CD, but also a DVD of his Comedy Central stand-up special and various bonus features including animations and rare footage.

If you think the muck-racking, sensationalistic, celeb-fueled, vindictive journalism of people like Drudge is a recent invention, then you’ve never heard of the titular subject of Winchell (HBO, Rated R, DVD-$14.98 SRP). Stanley Tucci plays Walter Winchell with the verve and vigor of a man possessed by a desperate need for the attention his control of the airwaves in the 1930’s gave him – and the power it brought over both his friends and enemies, including stars and politicians. If history is cyclical, than Winchell’s legacy is still very much with us today.

One of the BBC’s best literary adaptations – Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice – gets a deluxe 10th anniversary box set (A&E, Not Rated, DVD-$59.95 SRP), featuring not only the full 5-hour miniseries, but also a newly produced retrospective documentary with the cast and crew, and the new Jane Austen episode of Biography. If that weren’t enough, the gold-embossed cloth slipcase also includes a 120-page companion book packed with photos and behind-the-scenes information.

Dave Smith’s The Official Encyclopedia of Disney (Disney Editions, $40.00 SRP) is one of those tomes that find a welcome slot in the library of any nerdy fan, packed with trivia and information about every scrap of minutiae you can imagine ever wanting to know about all things Disney – from the films to the theme parks. Heck, it even has an entry for Honker Muddlefoot. That, my friends, is one comprehensive book.

First off, let me say that the soundtrack album for Running With Scissors (EMI, $18.98 SRP) is one of those wonderful mix tapes we’ve come to expect from an indie flick – including tracks like Manfred Mann’s “Blinded By The Light,” Elton John’s “Bennie and the Jets,” Phoebe Snow’s “Poetry Man,” the Vince Guaraldi Trio’s version of “O Tannenbaum,” Crosby Stills Nash’s “Teach Your Children,” and more. That being said, the film’s poster image (found on the cover) is the most disturbing use of an anthropomorphized hand since the poster for M*A*S*H.

You want a new way to plan a weekend’s cinema experience? This past June, Docurama released a batch of amazing documentaries to DVD that had only been seen at select festivals around the country, inaugurating a DVD-based “Docurama Film Festival”, giving many of these films a shot at the spotlight and audiences. Encouraged by the success of the first go-round, they’re doing it again, and I’m going to take a moment to recommend the first trio of flicks I’ve seen from this go round, starting with Paul Devlin’s Power Trip (Docurama, Not Rated, DVD-$26.95 SRP), which chronicles American power company AES’s attempts to transform the dilapidated electrical infrastructure of Tbilisi (the capitol of the former Soviet Republic of Georgia), in the face of a political, economic, and social instability. It’s a quite touching portrait of the formerly Communist populace – who never had to pay for power under the old system – and the company’s attempts to get the people back on their feet in the face of open mutiny at the concept of paying for power. The disc features deleted scenes, Georgian PSAs, and more.

The Education of Shelby Knox (Docurama, Not Rated, DVD-$26.95 SRP) focuses on one young girl’s attempt to bring sex education courses to her oppressively conservative Texas town, which is filled with religious fervor and raging hormones, plus the usual social ills and stigmas facing kids in any town, but which are amplified by the fanatical blindness of community leaders, parents, and even some of Shelby’s fellow teenagers.

Finally, there’s Parallel Lines (Docurama, Not Rated, DVD-$26.95 SRP). On September 11, 2001, filmmaker Nina Davenport was in California. Her apartment was thousands of miles away in New York, overlooking the World Trade Center. Unable to book a flight back home, she was forced to rent a car and drive cross country – during which she decided to get out her camera and document her trip across America, and the people and opinions and hopes and dreams she encountered along the way. As the media went maudlin with their 9/11 anniversary coverage and Washington tried to use it as a political tool, Davenport’s film is a much-needed reminder that America isn’t about symbols – it’s about people. The disc also features an interview with Davenport.

While most people might only know of The Byrds for “Mr. Tambourine Man” or “Turn Turn Turn,” listening to the 4-disc The Byrds: There Is A Season box set (Sony Legacy, $54.98 SRP) firmly establishes their place in music history, including soaring harmonies, folk transitioning to country-rock sound, and members who went on to seed other 60’s super-groups (including David Crosby). In addition to all of their album tracks, the set also features rarities, demos, and live cuts, plus a bonus DVD of rare TV appearances. Oh, and let’s not forget the nearly 100-page photo-filled booklet. Great, great stuff.

I love peeks behind-the-scenes of the often absurd, unexpected realities behind-the-scenes of the entertainment industry, which is probably why I got a kick out of I Killed: True Stories of the Road from America’s Top Comics (Crown, $23.95 SRP). As you can guess from the title, it’s a collection of anecdotes and experiences culled from stand-ups including Chris Rock, Brett Butler, Larry David, Drew Carey, Tom Arnold, Ron White, Jay Leno, Mike Myers, and more, all about their time criss-crossing the country from club to club.

I will say this – regardless of how kiddie-friendly the story itself may be, I found the character design and animation in Curious George (Universal, Rated G, DVD-$29.98 SRP) to be absolutely stunning. I mean, this is some of the most appealing design work I’ve seen from any studio in years, and that includes the biggies at Disney and even Pixar. Like I said, the story is slight and mainly for the youngsters, but adults can get quite a few visual oohs and ahs of their own. Bonus materials include deleted scenes, behind-the-scenes featurettes, and a sing-along Jack Johnson music video.

I’ve always been interested in the story of Bettie Page – the legendary 1950’s pin-up model whose erotic photos in that straightlaced era led to a Senate investigation. In particular, what motivated her to become an icon of sensuality in an age of repressed sexuality, and even more than that, what happened to her? The Notorious Bettie Page (HBO, Rated R, DVD-$27.98 SRP) attempts to answer many of those questions, and features an amazing performance by Gretchen Mol as Page. Bonus materials include an audio commentary, a featurette on the “Pin-Up Queen Universe,” “Presenting Bettie Page,” and the theatrical trailer.

The Art of Winnie The Pooh (Disney Editions, $35.00 SRP) is a collection of dozens of pieces featuring the denizens of the Hundred-Acre Wood done by Disney artists. While that may seem pretty straightforward, what’s surprising about the artwork is just how diverse the styles are – no one was restricted to a house style or thematic, but were instead allowed to interpret Pooh and friends in their own style, making for a page-turning range with plenty of surprises.

To his day, I can think of no crueler – and honestly, no sadistically funnier – joke than to make an aspiring actor of 20 years believe that he has finally landed the lead in an epic movie. That the victim is a completely clueless, incredibly deluded man who could never land such a role – with good reason – is only half the joke, with the remainder made up by his unbelievable faith that the elaborate fantasy around him is actually deserved. Windy City Heat (Paramount, Not Rated, DVD-$19.99 SRP) deserves its place as a cult classic, and watching Perry – the victim – actually develop a star complex over the course of “filming” is truly priceless. The DVD features an extended cut of the film, footage from when Perry found out about the joke, audio/video commentary from Perry, deleted scenes, and more.

I’ve said it before, but it’s absolutely true that practically every season of Everybody Loves Raymond (HBO, Not Rated, DVD-$44.98 SRP) is virtually interchangeable, and that goes for the show’s 7th season, as well. The antics of the Barone family were pretty consistent across its run, making for the perfect escapist sitcom – like a latter day Honeymooners, with clearly defined characters and conflicts. And I mean that in the best possible way. It’s like the Law & Order of sitcoms. The 5-disc set features all 25 episodes, plus a quartet of audio commentaries, deleted scenes, and a blooper reel.

A Slight Case of Murder (Warner Bros., Not Rated, DVD-$19.98 SRP) is wonderfully comic noir-throwback, starring William H. Macy as on-air film critic Terry Thorpe, a man in the wrong place at the wrong time who’s seen one-too-many crime movies. With a supporting cast that includes Adam Arkin, James Cromwell, and Felicity Huffman, you know it’s got to be at least worth checking out.

I always sit down with one of the University of Mississippi Press’s “Conversations With Filmmakers” books with the intention of reading just an interview or two before going off to do something else, but I always find myself engrossed by the in-depth discussions – and before I know it, I’m done. The latest volumes are Woody Allen: Interviews and Howard Hawks: Interviews (University of Mississippi Press, $20.00 SRP each).

If you were to cross The A-Team with Magnum PI, their bastard child would have been the 80’s series Riptide (Sony, Not Rated, DVD-$39.95 SRP). It was everything an 80’s action-medy should, featuring two pals, a detective agency in LA, and a nebbish 3rd wheel solving mysterious cases. The 30-disc set features all 13 first season episodes, but not a single bonus feature.

In what can only be described as a Stephen King fest, you can blow some of your hard-earned cash picking up special editions of both The Dead Zone and Pet Sematary (Paramount, Rated R, DVD-$14.99 SRP each) – both featuring audio commentaries and newly-produced featurettes – as well as King and director Mick Garris’s adaptation of Desperation (Lionsgate, Rated R, DVD-$26.98 SRP), featuring commentary and King’s “Postcards from Bangor, ME.”

On the bubble after it was announced that UPN and The WB would be merging to form The CW, fans of One Tree Hill can breathe a sigh of relief knowing that their show will be back, and can relive senior year via the new 3rd season box-set (Warner Bros., Not Rated, DVD-$59.98 SRP). The 6-disc set features unaired scenes, a gag reel, and both commentary and a behind-the-scenes featurette for the episode “With Tired Eyes, Tired Minds, Tired Souls, We Slept.”

If you’ve been collecting the DVDs of Cosgrove Hall’s beautiful stop-motion Wind in the Willows series, you’ll want to make sure you add the 2-disc Wind in the Willows: Feature Film Collection (A&E, Not Rated, DVD-$29.95 SRP), containing the original features that started it all, including the adaptation of Kenneth Grahame’s original tales, plus A Tale of Two Toads. Bonus features include an interview with Brian Cosgrove, an episode from season 3, and a photo gallery.

If the full season box sets are a little too financially intimidating – or you’re completely unfamiliar with their work – than The Best of The Kids In The Hall: Volume 1 (A&E, Not Rated, DVD-$14.95 SRP) is probably your best bet. The first volume contains the 4 best-of shows created for the first two seasons, and also features the audio commentaries with the Kids from the full box sets.

While the movie is pretty run-of-the-mill, I found myself being carried forward by Down In The Valley (Lionsgate, Rated R, DVD-$27.98 SRP) almost entirely by its cast – Edward Norton, Evan Rachel Wood, and David Morse. Faced with troubled teen (Wood), a suburban cowboy (Norton) falls head over boots in love despite a dark secret and a father (Morse) intent on keeping the two apart. Bonus features include a filmmaker Q&A and deleted scenes.

Knowing there were some structural pitfalls, I paid extra-close attention during The Lake House (Warner Bros., Rated PG, DVD-$28.98 SRP) – which finds Keanu Reeves and Sandra Bullock as two would-be lovers who trade letters while living in the same house by the lake… The catch being they’re two years apart and the mailbox is magic. Or something. I don’t know. No matter how hard I paid attention, I never really understood the whole concept of the thing. Don’t get me wrong – it’s not a bad film at all, it’s just… Well, come on… Magic Mailbox. Bonus features include additional scenes, outtakes, and the theatrical trailer.

Relatively brief, the latest Danger Mouse collection (A&E, Not Rated, DVD-$39.95 SRP) sports the show’s final 4 seasons – 21 episodes in total – across its 3 discs. As if that weren’t enough, there’s also a bonus episode of Count Duckula (“Town Hall Terrors”), alternative theme song options, and a theme song karaoke.

If you want proof of close-mindedness, look no further than the case of NBC’s *extremely* short-lived The Book Of Daniel (Universal, Not Rated, DVD-$29.98 SRP). Once religious extremists in this country heard that the show featured a priest (Aidan Quinn) who actually had the temerity to question the church hierarchy and – you know – actually live in the world with his family, the sirens went a-wailing (sight unseen, mind you) and NBC buckled by canceling the show almost immediately. Some people might want to look up the word “tolerance,” while those looking for a thought-provoking show yanked before its time should check out this DVD set, featuring all 5 episodes, plus deleted scenes.

Okay, who can possibly resist a Thunder In Paradise Collection (Lionsgate, Not Rated, DVD-$19.98 SRP)? I mean, it’s 3-discs full of Hulk Hogan and speedboats. Hulk Hogan and speedboats!!! I am so there.

For the life of me, I can’t understand what anyone sees in the Fast and the Furious franchise. To me, it’s hyperactive crap in fast cars – which I guess, when I think about it, must be the appeal. For those who get off on it, there’s the third installment – Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift (Universal, Rated PG-13, DVD-$29.98 SRP). Bonus features include deleted scenes, commentary, a location featurette, and a look at the car customization.

So there you have it… my humble suggestions for what to watch, listen to, play with, or waste money on this coming weekend. See ya next week…

September 28, 2006

Trailer Park: Greg Grunberg Has Something In Mind Part 2

Filed under: Columns,Trailer Park — admin @ 11:56 pm

By Christopher Stipp

Archives? Right Here…

I swear I only had 2 glasses of wine at dinner last Saturday night.

It was a rare evening where I was able to relax a little bit with my wife and not have to worry about making sure there was room enough to squeeze in a high chair and, perhaps, whether the restaurant was equipped with Crayolas to keep the 3 year-old occupied.

No, this was an evening I shared with an old friend and his wife where I mentioned that I used his “situation” in passing with Greg Grunberg, the man of the hour in NBC’s HEROES.

“What situation is that,” he asked.

“Well, things were going along fine,” I said, “but he was talking about his son with epilepsy and somehow I told him I have a friend who came out of the shower one morning and all of a sudden you started to have a seizure.”

I knew he wouldn’t mind, he didn’t, but I told him that I talked about it because it illustrated the whole point about why it is that Greg does what he does: because epilepsy isn’t something that’s talked about in an open way. Greg mentions that epilipsy is the 2nd most common neurological disorder next to migranes but that it’s not really put out there in the public discourse sphere as one would share about the trials and tribulations of dealing with a migrane headache.

The moment between all of us at the table was a real honest one. Apart from my friend’s wife being the only person present who knew who Greg was, she knew him from his work to help raise awareness for epilepsy, the discussion dipped down into what medications my friend was on to keep his afflication at bay since it reared its head only a couple of years ago when he was well past 30. The discussion ranged from what caused his seizures, no one knows, the medication he’s been using to keep from having seizures, there’s a couple that make up his drug cocktail, and, perhaps, one of the most telling statements, that the seizures were actively trying to come back after he decided that his medication wasn’t really needed anymore.

There are few things that really don’t make for good dinner conversation but this did. It took an interview with the man who is trying to establish HEROES as a genuine gem in the arsenal of free television. From big budgets to big projects that he’s linked to in an effort to help his son Greg is a very occupied father. He talks openly about getting that life/work balance but it is his frankness, the honesty with which he talks, that made for an interview that was exciting to listen to while being actively engaged in it.

And while I know that most of the readers here have the kind of cabbage that is ear-marked for other things, like eating meals, it would behoove some of you out there with a beating heart to check out Greg’s involvement with the Pediatric Epilepsy Project and think about donating a a couple bucks by buying something in the celebrity store.

As well, check out Greg’s musical project called Band From TV, stocked well with luminaries from the small screen, which you can also see here, and just seems like something that could do well when played in the presence of those in the need for another spirited rendition of Mustang Sally with something else fueling it other than a karaoke machine and a case of Schlitz. And with Bob Guiney from THE BACHELOR as your lead singer does it really get any better than this? I think not, sirs.

We pick up where we left off, talking about the shooting schedule for HEROES.

And how’s the shooting schedule been like? Different cast, different director”¦

Yeah, it’s pretty much the same as it’s been, for me”¦I mean it’s heavier for me than it was on ALIAS. When I’m working, it depends. Like the episode I’m about to start is a big episode for my character so I’ll be working 6 or 7 of the 8 days it takes to shoot the episode. Usually I’m on an episode for 3 or 4 days and it’s not so bad.

Any adjustments you’ve had to make because of you being front and center and not just the background, character actor you’ve been”¦

No, not really. I enjoy that role. A lot. I really, really enjoy it.

You know, the playing field, like right now, is like me and Adrian and Milo and we have a lot of TV experience but all of that changes, just like it did on LOST. As soon as the show airs”¦everyone will have their favorite character. It’s like 8 shows in one, really. You follow Masi, which Masi will be the break-out character, everyone will love the character of Hiro, He’s unbelievable. He’s the only character in the pilot, at least, who is loving his ability and is relishing it. And people love that. That’s what I love watching it. As soon as the show gets up and running everyone is going to have their favorite character that they love.

For me, like I did these pilots where I starred, I was the main star of GRAND UNION and of THE CATCH. That’s where I want to be. I love doing that but I also love being part of a great ensemble like this.

I’m happy just working.

Just being employed.

(Laughs)

Yeah. Absolutely. And with good material! I’ve been really, really, really fortunate and I know it and I never take one script, one day, one part, anything for granted. I’m so lucky that I met Tim. We already working with each other and he’s absolutely all about the work”¦he has an incredible team. He’s been doing this for a long time so he’s like J.J. I mean, the crew? Incredible. We had the great crew coming from FELICITY and ALIAS, and a lot of these people stick together and J.J. likes to use the same people and Tim too. They know to make a show. They know how to”¦They don’t freak out if we’re running hours over in a day, we’ll make it up”¦He’s got an executive producer, Dennis Hammer, if you want to make a TV show, he’s the guy you want working with you. He’s just amazing.

There’s so much to worry about and so much that happens, making a show, and there’s so much money involved, but these guys are unfazed. They know how to do it, they’ve done it so much and even on a show that has a production budget that this has, they know they’re going to be able and bring it every week. And they do.

And how much of that is going into effects and the like?

They’ve got a lot of effects, a lot of really cool shots. This show balances that kind of visual candy and character development like no other show I’ve seen. LOST is a good example of that. This has many more special effects shots than LOST.

Yeah, I’ve seen people flying around”¦

Yes, exactly. There’s flying around”¦there’s Hayden, her character I love because she’s indestructible and that’s cool and they’ve got a lot of that going on but it gets expensive. It’s hard”¦You’ve got to plan ahead. They need lead time to be able and do those effects. I haven’t been disappointed at all. After the pilot I thought there could be no way, “How are they going to keep this up?” And they do it every week.

You seem to be able and strike a nice balance with both work and life, some people in your profession take this a little too seriously, but is there a temptation to delve too much into work and not paying attention to the periphery?

Um”¦I think there can be but I was really lucky in that my family, I started a family, my wife keeps me incredibly grounded, and I hate to use the word “grounded,” my head starts swelling, it’s not my personality but”¦you can get lost in all that stuff. The truth is that’s a job like anything else. I love what I do, I’m so lucky in that I don’t consider it work at all and I have had my family, we started a family and got married before I was ever acting on a regular basis. I had so many jobs and small businesses, crazy stuff just to keep the rent paid before I was fortunate enough to really call myself an actor, where I was just making a living acting”¦I can look back and know how lucky I am. I don’t take anything for granted.

Also, on ALIAS, working with Victor Garber and Ron Rifkin and Jen and Michael”¦We’ve all had our ups and downs, we’ve all been in the business for long enough that you go a year without having anything steady you kind of go, “Uh, man.” You look back and think, “How lucky was I to be on a TV show?” So, I don’t ever forget that. Again, I’m just so lucky to be a part of this and I think this has the potential to go for many years.

In between those slow times, I don’t purport to know how long you’ve had HEROES in the hopper, even with THE CATCH and GRAND UNION was there a period of time when nothing was catching or did you ever feel that, “I want to do something but nothing seems to be working right now?”

Yeah, I mean the last few years it’s been”¦Where I kind of compare every script that’s sent to me or scripts that I get a hold of I compare it to the quality of the stuff I’ve done and I want to keep that quality up. I know Keri Russell had that problem after FELICITY, every script you get you compare it to J.J. and it’s not fair to do that. I hopefully am versatile enough in the decision makers’ minds that they can use me for comedy and they can use me for this or that because I like to do it all but I’ve also started this band, this celebrity band”¦

I was just about to bring that up”¦

That’s what”¦I love balancing all that stuff. I’ve got this charity, my oldest son has epilepsy, he’s being treated at UCLA and they’ve got a foundation there that I’ve become a big part of called the Pediatric Epilepsy Project.

I’d like to know where has the latest Band From TV played to raise money.

We had a big event the first year and it’s so much work to have an event that people come to and have live music and arrange all that stuff it costs so much money to put the event on and you have to charge so much money so what I’ve done is that when I did HOUSE Hugh [Laurie] and I became good friends, James Denton and I have known each other because we’ve both been on ABC for a long time and James plays guitar, Hugh plays keyboards and I play the drums. I’ve been playing in a garage band for years and years and I decided to invite these guys to one of the rehearsals and, all of a sudden, Bonnie Summerville, through a mutual friend, Bonnie shows up and she has got the most incredible voice. Honestly, she’s an incredible singer. Hugh is incredible on the keyboards, I can hold my own on the drums, to watch James Denton play the guitar and sing a Garth Brooks tune is just fun. And we blow people away because they’re not expecting this. And the band I play with, and the guys that really back us up are really good musicians so suddenly we’ve got something that people really respond to.

TV Guide just paid us a couple hundred thousand dollars to play their post-Emmy party.

I just read about that”¦

It was amazing. Pink, she didn’t open for us but she played before us, then we played and then all that money, part of it goes to my charity, part of it goes to James’ and Hugh’s and Bonnie’s”¦And we’ve got Bob Guiney who’s the bachelor Bob, who couldn’t be more of a sweeter guy, who’s also got a great voice”¦so we’ve got this band now and we’re making a DVD and a CD, this place, Rehersals.com has backed us.

The St. Louis Rams asked us to play the national anthem and then the half-time show which is going to be crazy. I don’t know when or what game but we’ve been asked to do that, we’ve been asked to play”¦Schwarzenegger has this, the governor has this After School All Stars, which is a part of his physical education program for the public schools, they have a huge event coming up in Beverly Hills next month and he’s asked us to play that. There’s this meeting of the Middle East, and I don’t even know exactly what it is, but it’s like sort of a coalition of all the delegates from the Middle East showing we can get along”¦world musicians and we’ve been asked to play and sort of represent the Hollywood side of it. So, all these offers are coming in and hopefully the DVD, we’ve been shooting it, and CD, hopefully it’ll be huge. If we make a ton of money on it these charities will benefit so much.

I sent a check to PEP just yesterday and they called me back in tears. They couldn’t believe it. And, so, this is how I intend to raise money for them instead of putting on a big event.

What kind of tracks can we expect?

Right now, the first album is going to be called “Hogging All The Covers” and it’s just a bunch of cover songs. We play anything from “Shake Your Tail Feather” to “Mustang Sally”, you know, “Hard To Handle”, “Take Another Piece of My Heart””¦great songs..,””You’ve Really Got Me” by Van Halen and the set, our set, is so much fun and it’s like one song after another “Hit Me With Your Best Shot” like all these songs you love”¦And I’ve tried to keep control of the music, thankfully we’re all of the same mind set, which is that we’re familiar faces that people are comfortable with, let’s keep the music the same, you’re having a good time and you’re rocking out”¦

When we played this TV Guide party everyone was dancing and singing. We had a few rehearsals leading up to it that we invited the public down to and so it’s great seeing people having a great time and they’re happy to dole out, whatever, the 10 bucks just to come see us and it all goes to charities. It’s a lot of fun.

And Hollywood Hands. Is it still around?

That was the first fundraiser attempt and that raised a lot of money, like 300 grand, for UCLA and that was those guitars, hand painted guitars, and people can still go to CelebrityCars.com. We took that artwork and made the greeting cards out of them. So, people can go to Celebrity Cards, they can buy the greeting cards and that money goes to PEP.

There a few different ways that I am generating”¦if they can get a few different revenue streams going then they’ll be fine. It’s not like UCLA needs, of course if someone gave them 50 million dollars they would be happy, but they don’t need that much money. They need operating costs for their research and treatment and their staff”¦the hardest thing for them”¦they don’t work on billable hours. I call the doctor when Jake has a seizure. I call and I say, “What do I do? He just had a seizure. I gave him the medicine”¦” Then they talk me through it, they don’t bill me for that conversation. So, there’s so much time spent helping families who need help and they don’t make the money you expect them to make and they don’t drive the cars you expect these doctors to drive, they’re not making a lot of money at all. They really do need help. And then, the other charity that’s a benefit, Hugh Laurie’s charity, Save the Children, that’s an incredible charity. Jamie just helped Cure Autism Now with his money, The Coalition Against Domestic Violence is Bonnie’s. So, there’s some really important charities that we’re helping out and we get to be rock stars”¦

(Laughs)

I have a question about PEP, if you don’t mind”¦

No, not at all”¦

Is there, and I don’t want to say cure because I am deeply ignorant on the subject”¦

I think, through stem cell research, how they’ve helped with Parkinson’s patients, that, and I kind of pray this, I really do think Jake, my son who’s 10, will not have to deal with epilepsy for the majority of his life. This is what I am really hoping for. Years ago they didn’t have ways of going in and operating, even if it was localized, even if they could find it in the brain, but now they can. The medications”¦there’s a medication that Jake has that every single child with epilepsy should carry with them and every parent should carry with them, it’s called Diastat, it’s like his emergency medicine. And that, I know, stops seizures. I know it stops it. If he has a grand mal seizure, that will stop the seizure. He’s on a series of 6 medications. These medications weren’t available years ago so it’s one of those where, yeah, I think they’re moving a lot quicker, the FDA is allowing these drug companies to use these medications”¦Let’s say a medication was originally used to treat migraine headaches but it benefits epilepsy patients. They’re letting that crossover happen as long as they do the clinical trials. These scientists, these researchers, the doctors, they need our help. They need the research funds.

Epilepsy is not a glamorous disease. It’s not talked about as much as it should. People are embarrassed to talk about it and they shouldn’t be. The awareness”¦it’s the second most common neurological disorder behind migraine headaches.

It’s odd you say that because I have a friend who is in his early 30’s and, a couple of years ago, it was just an onset. He started to have seizures all of a sudden. No warning. He had his life flipped as he was prohibited from driving a motor vehicle for months following that. Eventually it waned but it was terrifying.

Was it grand mal seizures?

I”¦just don’t know. I wish I could say that I was inquisitive enough to really find out what happened but I felt kind of odd bringing it up if he wasn’t going to talk about it. I don’t know whether I felt uncomfortable talking about it or”¦

It’s amazing. The way I compare it”¦your brain has a lot of wiring that send messages, it’s like two lightning bolts have to meet, and in your brain and in my brain they meet all the time, messages are sent the way they should. Well, what happens if one lightening bolt is pointed up and the other one is pointed down? The brain just goes “Whoa!” and it starts shaking and the message is not going where it’s supposed to go. With Jake, luckily, he developed epilepsy at age 7, his brain was fully developed. But kids who get it, as infants, while their brain is still developing, you can see how it’s affected them. In their speech, in their learning”¦Jake has an incredible team at school working with him and we just encourage him to do everything that a normal kid would do but we just have to be right there. I mean, we have a pool and Jake swims, I’ve got to be right there with him. If you have a seizure when you’re swimming? You could drown, easily. But I can’t not let him swim, he loves to swim.

He’s on a restricted diet, Jake has an implant that stimulates his brain, we’re doing everything we possibly can to stop his seizures. Jake is a very difficult case to treat, but if you were to meet him you would never know he has epilepsy. You’d never know.

But a lot of people, like you say, don’t know what it is.

We just started school, grand mal seizure out on the yard in front of all the kids”¦and Jake is truly my hero because what happens is he has a seizure, we pick him up, we bring him home, and he says, “I want to go back to school. What are you doing? Let’s go back, I want to go back.”

(Laughs)

I’d want to stay at home”¦

If I had a seizure at work it would be like, “I’m staying at home for a few days.” It’s just the way we’ve been raising him and it’s just amazing. It’s amazing to see him like that. I thought that kids would make fun of him.
No. They don’t. They take his lead. It’s amazing. It’s like anything else”¦if you believe in yourself other people are going to believe that. You’re dictating how you want people to perceive you. He does”¦that’s the way he perceives himself.

We all have something to deal with. Everyone’s got something. This is his thing and take it or leave it, you know?

And do you draw strength from that?

For sure.

It puts everything into perspective. It really does. Everything else is just”¦it’s important in its own way, but, especially what I do, but how can I worry about a scene that I’m shooting when this, this is big stuff. This is the stuff of challenges that you’re faced with. I can do anything. Put me in front of 60,000 people, I’ll pull my pants down.

(Laughs)

It all doesn’t mean anything to me. When I see my son have the courage to go through what he’s going through”¦that’s real strength. That’s the real thing.

Comics in Context #148: Radio City Rowling

Filed under: Columns,Comics in Context — admin @ 11:55 pm
comicsincontext4.jpg

Merely eight days after my return from this year’s San Diego Comic Con, I attended an event that outdid any of the presentations in the convention’s Hall H, an occasion that the Con is unlikely ever to duplicate, and it was right here in my home base of New York City.

On August 2, 2006, I attended An Evening with Harry, Carrie and Garp at Radio City Music Hall. This was the second of two nights of readings, performed on behalf of charities, by three best-selling novelists. And just who in the literary world could pack a venue the size of Radio City Music Hall? There was John Irving, author of The World According to Garp, The Cider House Rules, and nine other novels. There was the organizer, Stephen King, the modern master of horror. I do not know how often Irving makes public appearances, but King has become a familiar face in New York, appearing at the New Yorker Festival and this season at Manhattan’s Symphony Space. But the third author lives in Britain, rarely makes public appearances and had not visited the United States in six years: J. K. Rowling, writer of the Harry Potter series. I never expected to see her in person, but I did at Radio City Music Hall that night.

The usually ubiquitous Beat was aghast that I succeeded in attending when she did not. I was surprised myself at how easy it was to get in: I merely stopped by a Ticketmaster outlet two nights before. But on the night I attended, the Music Hall did indeed look sold out, as far as I could tell.

King came up with the idea for the two “Evenings” were and invited Irving and Rowling to join him. King selected one of the charities that would benefit, the Haven Foundation, which aids writers and performing artists who are prevented from working by serious illness or injury. Rowling chose the other charity, Doctors Without Borders, a humanitarian organization that provides medical aid worldwide. At a press conference King said he hoped the two nights would raise a quarter of a million dollars for each charity.

I wondered how Rowling reacted to flying across the ocean to arrive in New York City in the midst of one of this summer’s unusually intense heat waves, with heat indexes of one hundred degrees or more during her stay. When I arrived at Radio City Music Hall in the early evening of August 2, the weather was reasonably endurable, and the building’s air conditioning quickly put me at ease.

The show began with a welcoming speech by actress Whoopi Goldberg, who got off to a bad start by making the common error of mispronouncing Rowling’s name. (It doesn’t rhyme with “howling,” though that might seem appropriate, but with “bowling.” Since this was the second night she had given the speech, you’d think someone might have corrected her beforehand.) Nonetheless, it was an entertaining speech, in which Goldberg declared that “These three writers are forces of nature equal to or greater than any of the supernatural events you can find in their books.” Goldberg commented that “somebody should have put them all together a long time ago. Because. . .if that little wimpy boy [Harry?] had asked that poor girl [definitely King’s Carrie] to the prom, it would have stopped a whole lot of crying.”

Goldberg noted the large contingents of fans for Irving, King, and Rowling who were present in the audience. “There are plenty of J. K. Rowling fans here tonight,” Goldberg said, “and I think I know why they’re screaming,” as indeed they were., “It’s because all of the Stephen King fans are whispering to them all of the ways that Harry could possibly die.” As for those King fans, Goldberg maintained that “we hardly ever get together because so many of us are angry loners.” (Neither angry nor alone, the audience appreciatively laughed.)

Goldberg introduced the next celebrity, who was in turn to introduce King. It was Tim Robbins, who played the lead in The Shawshank Redemption (1994), the film adaptation of King’s prison story, Appropriately, Robbins wore a striped shirt and pants that evoked prison garb. Among the celebrities making introductory speeches that night, Robbins was far and away the best, thanks to his running gag. Observing that the movie’s “title has been a source of confusion for its many fans,” Robbins proceeded to mispronounce it every time the name turned up in his speech, and each time more elaborately (e. g. “Shankshaw Redaction,” “Shinkshank Reduction“). You might think this would become tiresome, but the gag instead kept building in impact on the audience, and prevented Robbins’ speech from becoming mired in the expected tributes to King’s authorial prowess.

After each author was introduced, there was a brief overview of his or her life and work shown on the videoscreens hanging over the stage, including clips from films adapted from the author’s books. I noted that in King’s case there was no excerpt from perhaps the best known film adaptation of his work, Stanley Kubrick’s The Shining (1980), which King is on record as detesting.

Then each author would come out and read from a miniature set that was apparently designed to evoke his or her work. King got to sit on a replica of a backwoods back porch, although he soon became restless and moved about the stage.

The three authors exemplified the dress code that I witnessed at the Eisner awards at the San Diego Con: the women dress up, and the men dress down.
King represented one end of the evening’s fashion spectrum, wearing a blue sweatshirt, looking as casual as could be without slipping over into sloppiness.

King began by thanking the audience for their hearty applause. “I think all the muggles are home tonight watching TV. The real people are here.” Damn straight. Then he looked warily at the chair. “You don’t think this thing’s electrified, do you?”

King told us, “Well, so that was a really nice introduction, and people said very nice things, and now I think I’ll read a really gross story. Because it’s what I do. Hope you enjoyed your supper because you may not for long.”

King chose to read “The Revenge of Lardass Hogan” from his novella The Body, which was adapted into the movie Stand by Me (1986). “Revenge” is about a small town pie-eating contest for which which the title character prepares by drinking a bottle of castor oil. During the contest, once Hogan has devoured enough pie, he starts to throw up, inducing an epidemic of vomiting from everyone (and on everyone) present, ending in Hogan’s triumph: tying with his chief competitor.

King gave a bravura performance, at one point interrupting the story to exult, “I actually get paid for writing this stuff!” Listening to the tale, I realized that this was a comedic variation on the notorious prom scene from King’s Carrie: the protagonist uses his or her special talents to wreak grotesque havoc on a gathering of the community that have treated him or her as an underdog.

King was followed by actor Stanley Tucci, who gave a serious and perhaps too formal speech introducing John Irving. I had expected that the KIng and Rowling fans would overwhelmingly outnumber any Irving readers who had shown up, so I was surprised by the widespread, enthusiastic applause that greeted his entrance. Irving represented the middle of the evening’s fashion spectrum, in an open-necked shirt and white pants, seated in a comfy chair in a set with a lamp, old, bound volumes, and ornate fireplace, that suggested a prosperous man’s study.

Irving read a sequence from his novel A Prayer for Owen Meany, dealing with an annual Christmas pageant, for which the title character, an undersized schoolboy with a high-pitched voice, is usually sentenced to play an angel, ignominiously suspended above the stage; Owen, however, is determined to play the starring role, that of the infant Jesus, even though that role is assigned to actual babies.

This was definitely the best of the three readings. Like King’s story, Irving’s passage kept building in comedic impact as it proceeded. Moreover, Irving, who has been a wrestler as well as an author, assumed a falsetto voice for Owen’s dialogue, which added to the hilarity, being utterly incongruous with Irving’s physique. Irving even broke himself up a few times during the reader, much to the audience’s delight. Oh, and by the way, Irving’s reading also contained a reference to vomiting, the evening’s unexpected recurring motif.

The next introductory speech was made by Kathy Bates, who received a rousing welcome from the audience: the King fans know her as the star of the 1990 film adaptation of his book Misery. She had introduced King the night before; tonight she was there to introduce Rowling, who had been introduced on Tuesday by The Daily Show‘s Jon Stewart.

“Tonight,” Bates began, “our next author makes her much-anticipated return to the United States, the first visit in six years. And that’s why at this moment I feel like Ed Sullivan when he was about to introduce the Beatles. Some of you kids be sure to ask your parents what I’m talking about in the way home. The Beatles were in a band called Wings.” Well, actually, anyone who grew up after the 1970s isn’t going to get that joke, either. Time passes more quickly than we may like to think. Describing the passion for Rowling’s work as “Pottermania,” Baker went on to praise her books for fostering a new generation’s enthusiasm for reading “just when it seemed that technology had infiltrated every last aspect of our lives. . . .” Baker summed up, “With words on a page, J. K. Rowling lured kids away from the screens and into the quiet of their rooms and took them to places where Google does not go.”

Then there was a video overview of Rowling’s career, some of which was drawn from the BBC special Harry Potter and Me, which was repackaged in the United States as an episode of A & E’s Biography. The audience stirred when the onscreen Rowling showed the BBC interviewer the folder which contained the final chapter of the final Harry Potter book. When the face of Alan Rickman as Professor Snape flashed onto the screen, the audience applauded. Since I’ve always thought of Snape as the archetypal nasty teacher, this reaction surprised me. I had no idea he had so many supporters, and Rowling seemed taken aback by the audience’s response to him, too.

Then Rowling came onstage, displaying a fashion sense that decidedly showed up the men’s. With her long blonde hair, wearing a little black dress, and responding to the enormous applause with a brilliant smile, she cut a very striking figure onstage. Her set consisted of a large chair, resembling a throne, standing between a small table, atop which was a Japanese-style fan, and a tall lampstand, holding a candelabra-like arrangement of lights at the top. The scene evoked a British castle, perhaps Hogwarts itself.

Someone shouted out, “Don’t kill Harry!” “No pressure there,” said Rowling, sounding pressured indeed. “I feel slightly like I’m Herman’s Hermits having to go on after the Stones and the Beatles.” (My gosh, not only won’t kids in the audience get that reference, but Rowling herself is too young to remember Herman’s Hermits in their mid-1960s heyday!) The audience, the press, and even King and Irving may have considered Rowling to be the star of the show, but she seems to have considered the two veteran writers her superiors.

She continued, “My consolation is I have the most interesting shoes.” It turns out that she used the same line the night before, so the video cameramen were ready. An enormous close-up of Rowling’s feet appeared on the videoscreens, and she had on these high-heeled silver sandals with serpent-like straps. She was right to be pleased.

“I notice you like Snape,” Rowling observed in an amused tone. Then she said she would do a reading from the most recent of her books, last year’s Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince. (Those of you who have not read this book hereby receive a spoiler warning.) After that, she said, she would take some questions inasmuch as “in my experience my readers like me to answer questions and like me to hasten on to that part. . . .” In this particular sequence from the book, “Harry goes back in time and watches as Albus Dumbledore,” his mentor, “goes to inform another famous pupil of Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry that he has a place at the school.” The audience cheered at her reference to Tom Riddle, who would become the Potter books’ archvillain, Lord Voldemort. “And you really shouldn’t be cheering that particular one,” she responded. “Snape I can kind of see. . . .”
(But only “kind of,” you’ll note.)

Rowling’s reading went decently enough, and she even successfully essayed a lower class voice for a female character. But King and Irving had selected pieces that were brilliant comedy set pieces, and gave them tour de force performances. Rowling’s selection instead dealt in a quietly ominous mood, and, since she only rarely makes public appearances, she is presumably less practiced at doing such performances of her work.

Upon concluding her reading, Rowling dryly remarked that “nobody told me the theme of the readings was to be vomit. So I could have done something with the puking pastilles, but. . .I didn’t know.” And then she turned to questions from the audience.

The first question came from a girl who identified herself as Christina, a thirteen-year-old from Staten Island. She wanted to know, “If you could bring one Harry Potter character to life, other than Harry, who would it be?”

“Personally,” Rowling began, “although it’s a really tricky one: Hagrid, if I could have anyone.” The audience applauded the choice of Harry’s gigantic friend. “Because I think. . .we’d all like a Hagrid in our life, liability though he often is. . . . It would be really great if I met a fundamentalist Christian,” Rowling said, clearly referring to those parties who claim the Harry Potter books advocate satanism, “to say, “˜Would you like to discuss the matter with Hagrid?'”

The next questioner was an eighteen-year-old New Yorker who pointed out that in the most recent Potter book, Harry’s “Aunt Petunia is said to be oddly flushed when Dumbledore announces that Harry will be returning only once more to Privet Drive,” where she lives. “Does this mean that Aunt Petunia harbors a hidden love or fondness for Harry and the connection he provides her to the wizarding world?”

“That’s an excellent question,” replied Rowling, perhaps playing for time while she mulled over her answer. “And like all the best and most penetrating questions, it’s difficult to answer. But I will say this. There is a little more to Aunt Petunia than meets the eye and you will find out what that is in Book Seven.” At this the audience clapped and roared in excitement. They were present when J. K. herself had granted that rarest of valuables: a hint about what happens in the next book! (But what I want to know is, did she name Harry’s Aunt Petunia after Ben Grimm’s Aunt Petunia in Fantastic Four?)

That small hint, though, had not sated the audience’s appetite to know more.
Questioner #3 was a boy from New Jersey who gave his age as nine, enthused over the Harry Potter books, and then dropped a bombshell. Bringing up Dumbledore, the boy asked, “Since he is the most powerful wizard of all time and Harry Potter is so loyal to him, how could he really be dead?” The audience applauded and cheered, but Rowling buried her head in her hands and groaned. This very private writer was now having to answer to her readers en masse–including a small child–for the apparent death of a beloved character. “I feel terrible,” she said. “The British writer Graham Greene once said that every writer had to have a chip of ice in their heart,” she began to explain, but then dismay took over. “Oh, no,” she said, “I think you may just have ruined my career.”

“I really can’t answer that question because the answer is in Book Seven, but you shouldn’t expect Dumbledore to do a Gandalf. Let me just put it that way,” she said. I now wonder if this nine-year-old would have understood this reference to the wizard of Lord of the Rings who literally undergoes the traditional mythic device of death and resurrection. I had myself wondered if Dumbledore would “do a Gandalf,” but now it seems not. “I’m sorry,” she told the boy. But Rowling wasn’t out of the woods on the Dumbledore matter yet.

The next in line were a boy and his father, and you might expect that the boy was going to ask the question, but you would be wrong: the father did all the talking, and looked strangely familiar. “Hello,” said the father, “We are Salman and Milan Rushdie,” whereupon the audience burst into applause for the famous author. Not so very long ago, Rushdie was marked for death by Muslim fanatics and could not possibly have appeared in a huge public venue like Radio City Music Hall.

“I’m not sure this is fair, Salman,” said Rowling, seriously. “I think you might be better at guessing plots than most.” Rushdie, indeed, writes children’s fantasy himself, such as Haroun and the Sea of Stories, and did a book on MGM’s The Wizard of Oz (1939) for the British Film Institute.

Following the precedent set by the previous questioners, the elder Rushdie stated, “We are nine and fifty-nine.” He explained, “And this is really Milan’s question and it’s kind of a follow-up to the previous one.”

“All right, okay,” conceded Rowling, unable to escape the trap.

“Until the events of Volume 6,” Rushdie began, “it was always made plain that Snape might have been an unlikable fellow, but he was essentially one of the good guys.” The audience audibly agreed.

“I can see this is the question you all really want answered,” observed Rowling, vastly outnumbered.

“Dumbledore himself had always vouched for him,” Rushdie pointed out, like a debater marshaling his evidence.

“Yes,” agreed Rowling.

“Now we are suddenly told that Snape is a villain and Dumbledore’s killer,” asserted Rushdie. “We cannot, or don’t want to believe this. Our theory is that Snape is, in fact, still a good guy.” The audience applauded, as if Rushdie were Snape’s attorney, mounting his defense. “From which it follows that Dumbledore can’t really be dead,” Rushdie argued, “and that the death is a ruse cooked up between Dumbledore and Snape to put Voldemort off his guard, so that when Harry and Voldemort come face to face, Harry may have more allies than he or Voldemort suspects.” (This thought had occurred to me, too, when I read the book.) “So,” Rushdie summed up, delivering his coup de grace, “is Snape good or bad? In our opinion everything follows from it,” presumably meaning that if Snape is good, then Dumbledore lives.

Rushdie had said all this in a perfectly reasonable tone, without raising his voice, but the audience was nonetheless aroused, reacting with laughter and applause. One account of the evening claims that Rowling “chuckled” but from my vantage point I detected no sign of this. She was on the spot.

Instead, she replied quite cautiously, “Well, Salman, your opinion, I would say, is. . .right.” His opinion about what? That Snape is a good guy? If so, I’m surprised that Harry Potter fans haven’t made a greater fuss about this revelation. Or was his opinion that “everything follows” from the answer to whether or not Snape is a good guy?

Rowling then asserted, “But I see that I need to be a little more explicit and say that Dumbledore is definitely dead.” Both apologetically and defensively, she noted that “I do know that there is an entire website out there [named] DumbledoreIsNot Dead.com, so I’d imagine they’re not pretty happy right now.” Concerned, Rowling continued, “But I think. . .all of you need to move through the five stages of grief, and I’m just helping you get past denial.” Perhaps due to nervousness, she added, “I can’t remember what’s next” in the five stages. “It may be anger so I think we should stop it here. Thank you,” she bid the Rushdies, and the audience applauded.

Perhaps it was a relief for her that the time had come in the program for her to bring King and Irving back onstage to join her in taking further questions. Then King introduced Soledad O’Brien of CNN’s American Morning, who acted as moderator. She explained that over 1,000 questions had been submitted (via e-mail from ticket holders), from which twelve had been chosen. “The lucky dozen” questioners had been seated close to the stage and hence to the microphones; four of them had been the questioners during Rowling’s solo segment.

This was clever. The organizers knew that there would be more questions for Rowling than for King and Irving, so she got to take four before the men joined her onstage. Moreover, it’s clear that someone had carefully selected the questions. Salman Rushdie didn’t get picked by sheer chance. There were neither stupid questions nor the sort of embarrassing social misfits one sees in San Diego question lines. The San Diego Con and other conventions could learn from this event’s example.

The first questioner, a man from Alabama, asked. “Mr. King, do the contents of your head ever just scare the crap out of you?”

“No,” replied King: “I pass the savings on to you.” After the audience’s laughter subsided, King went on, “I’ve said this before: there are people out there that pay a psychiatrist, you know, ninety dollars an hour, they only get a fifty minute hour, and those guys take all of August off and they go somewhere it’s cool.” (There was an obvious reference to our heat wave.) King continued, “I vent the same terrible feelings of fear and inadequacy and phobic reactions, and people pay me. It’s a great way to live, man,” King concluded to applause.

Next came a woman from Connecticut who asked John Irving if he would describe any other sources for “events or characters” in A Prayer for Owen Meany.

Irving replied that “I’m a very slow processor with those things that have affected me personally or emotionally. . . .If Owen Meany is, it’s fair to say. . .my Vietnam novel, it was written twenty years after the war. . . . And I wrote my most autobiographical novel about my childhood and my adolescence most recently, when I was already in my late 50s and early 60s. I work better by waiting,” he concluded. in other words, he gains perspective with the passage of time.

As for the origin of Owen Meany, Irving said that when he was “back in my home town” one Christmas he got together with “two or three friends that, in some cases, I hadn’t seen since they were eight or nine or ten years old,” and they started discussing their friends who had either died in Vietnam or who had “thoroughly altered the course of their lives” through the steps they took “not to go.”

One of his friends mentioned a name that Irving did not recognize. “They said to me, “˜Well, in Sunday school you used to pick him up by his ankles and shake him until all of the money fell out of his pants.’ And then I remembered this very little boy who was smaller than all of us. And we loved him but we liked to infuriate him because he had a voice like this,” Irving said, shifting back into Owen’s falsetto, “and we’d love to hear him get mad., He was so small that whenever you were around him you just had to pick him up, which he hated.”

Then, Irving related, “I said one of the stupidest things I’d ever said in my life. I said to my friends, “˜Oh, he couldn’t have gone to Vietnam. He’s too small,’ having last seen him at the age of eight. And one of my closest friends said, “˜You moron, he probably grew!'” After the audience stopped laughing, Irving went on, “I went home and thought, what if he didn’t grow?. . .And that became Owen Meany.”

As a victim of bullying myself as a child, I wondered about Irving’s claim that he “loved” this boy that, by his own admission, he and his friends would bully and manhandle. With time comes maturity and perspective, and Irving turned this unnamed boy into a sympathetic central figure in his book. But is there still an element of condescension and mockery in the way that Irving imitates Owen’s high-pitched voice? And did we in the audience share that attitude by laughing at that imitation?

The next question was from a librarian from Pennsylvania who began by telling Rowling, “thank you for attracting so many students and adults as well to reading.” (Now there is something a little disturbing. It’s well known that Rowling’s books have inspired kids to become readers, but one might have hoped that people would have picked up the reading habit by the time they became adults.) The librarian wanted to know what Rowling would be writing after the final Harry Potter book.

Perhaps previous questions had put Rowling on guard, because she began, “I thought you were going to attack me for Madam Pince, and I would like to apologize to you and any other librarians present here today.” She explained that “if they’d”–her heroes–“had a pleasant, helpful librarian, half my plots would be gone. Because the answer invariably is in a book but Hermione has to go and find it. If they’d had a good librarian, that would gave been that problem solved. So, sorry.” Gosh, this is becoming J. K. Rowling’s penance tour of New York.

Then Rowling said upon completing the last Potter novel, she may go back to working on a shorter book “for I think slightly younger children that’s half-written.” But that won’t be soon. “I think I’ll need a short mourning period, though. You have to allow me to get past Harry.”

A woman from Milwaukee said that her mother, who lives in Maine, says that King has been “a tremendous contributor to the community” in Bangor and that the townspeople treat him as “a regular Mainer,” and asked King how he “managed” to do this.

“I’m just a regular guy, that’s all,” King replied (unlikely as that may seem). King explained that “if [people] only see you on a stage at Radio City Music Hall. . .for one night you get to be a big deal, but I’ll tell you something. . . Saturday I’m going to be home and my wife’s going to be there and she’s going to say, “˜Walk the dog and empty the dishwasher.’ And immediately your feet go back on the floor where you are.”

King continued, “We’ve lived in Bangor since 1979, which means we have one other set of neighbors on the street who have lived there longer than we have, but they’re senile and they don’t remember us, so that almost doesn’t matter anymore.”

King observed, “So we’ve been around. People know us. They’ve gotten used to us.” He noted that “they say familiarity breeds contempt, and before it breeds contempt, it breeds neighborliness, and that’s the nice thing about living in a small town.”

He went on, “We live in a neighborhood. We have an ice cream parlor around one corner and a forest around the other corner. . .It’s like the village that you write about in the Harry Potter books,” King told Rowling, “and it’s like the towns that John writes about in a lot of the New England settings in his books, and it’s great.” So there is a link among these three writers that I had not previously considered: they share an affinity for chronicling small town life.

A man from New York wanted to know if Irving would like to write a sequel about any of his characters.

“That’s a good question,” Irving said. “I think I will never write a sequel for a very simple reason. I need to know the ending of my novel before I begin. Not just the ending but the tone of the voice of the ending. What’s happened of major emotional importance. Who the main characters are. Who even the major minor characters are. Where their paths cross. I make a kind of street map of the novel.” He summed up, “I’ve always written the last sentence first and I work my way back.” Hence, “it’s impossible for me to imagine that anything happens after the ending because the ending has meant so much to me that it’s where I begin.”

This is very different from the world of comics, where serial publication rules, and longrunning characters go from one storyline to the next for years, and even decades. In contrast, Irving’s books would be plot-driven rather than character-driven.

But then Irving added something even more intriguing. “On the other hand, here’s what’s comparable to a sequel, and it happens to me . . .unconsciously many times. Characters come back as other characters in subsequent novels. And I don’t even recognize their reincarnation while they’re emerging. It’s only when I finish a book that I realize, “˜Oh, this character is just another version of this character from a previous book.’

He gave examples: “the physical description of Owen Meany, who is first described as looking embryonic, not yet born, was a passage I lifted from the physical description of the orphan Fuzzy Stone. . .in The Cider House Rules. . .” Here’s another: “Why is it Dr. Larch in The Cider House Rules, Jenny Fields in The World According to Garp, and eventually Johnny Wheelwright, the narrator of A Prayer for Owen Meany, all decide that they’ll never have sex? You know, I don’t know a lot of people like that.” He concluded, “So those are the curses of my sequels.”

As a critic I’m well aware that there are thematic similarities among the works of any writer, and that a writer will tend to endow his protagonists, say, with similar character traits. Irving not only admits the latter, but has found a provocative image for describing the phenomenon. I always admire his acknowledgment of the role of his own subconscious in devising his characters.

A woman from Toronto (Are you noticing how far some people came to attend this event?) asked King, “what kind of scary stories keep you up at night? Maybe your own? Maybe another author’s?”

King said that “I think our idea of what scares us changes as we get older. As a young person, one of the scariest things I ever read was Lord of the Flies, because . . .the idea of those kids turning feral just scared the dickens out of me.”

“Sometimes you get surprised into fright. When I picked up the Harry Potter books, I was not prepared for the depth of some of the frightening passages in there. Frankly, I was surprised by how scary the Death Eaters were.”

“I scared Stephen King,” Rowling declared, beaming with pride.

“Don’t be proud of yourself,” King warned her, in (mock?) annoyance, but it was too late: Rowling was obviously delighted.

A woman from Indiana asked Irving if he ever gets “so involved in a character’s storyline that it affects your personal life?” Irving’s response further illuminated his previous answer about needing to distance himself from his past in order to write about it. In his most recent book, Until I Find You, “it was my childhood, my adolescence, and as much as I had thought I had waited long enough, and that I was old enough to deal with those things, I just remembered a lot of stuff that I would have been happier not to.”

Next was a girl from Pennsylvania, who asked Rowling, “what is the one question your fans have never asked you and should have?” The audience loved this, since it was an invitation for Rowling to spill the beans on some other secret of the Harry Potter saga, as Rowling well realized.

“Oh, God!” Rowling lamented. “How can I answer that? I can think of a couple of things that give away the ending of Book Seven. . . .Having got sixteen years down the line, I kind of feel that would throw it away.” Rowling would not take the bait: “I’m sorry.”

As ever, she tried to explain by way of apology. “You see, people think that it’s all so fixed in my head. It’s not that obsessively plotted out.” (Not like Irving’s books, then?) “For example, this afternoon I believe I changed my mind on the title of Book Seven.” (The audience was audibly aroused.) “Having been quite convinced that I had the title, I suddenly thought, “˜No, that would be better, wouldn’t it?’ in the shower just before coming out here. . . .

“But you know what,” she said, “I’m not going to tell you either version,” and the audience moaned in disappointment. Finally, Rowling had reached the end of her capacity for contrition, although she seemed more defensive than angry, as if asking for understanding from her six thousand pampered children arrayed before her. “Oh, come on! Now really! Have I not given you enough? I gave you Aunt Petunia. I told you Dumbledore is really–“ whereupon she drew her finger across her neck in a slashing motion. There’s the chip of ice.

But her goodhearted sense of guilt immediately returned. “So I am trying to give something to you. Anyway, I’m sorry. I suppose it’s that question. Everyone’s really pleased you asked that question. It’s me who’s let everyone down, not you. Sorry.” Perhaps in part to cheer Rowling up, the audience applauded.

To end the evening O’Brien addressed her own question to all three authors” “If you were to have dinner with any five characters from any of your books. . .who would you invite and why would they be on your list?”

“Any five characters from any of my books?” asked King. “Honey, I’m eating alone.”

“You could just invite all the dead ones and then they wouldn’t come,’ offered Irving. (Now, really, there are plenty of good, even heroic characters in King’s books, too!)

“I would eat with Harry, Hermione, and Ron,” King said. “And Owen. . . .I can think of other people’s characters I’d eat with. And I can think of other people’s characters I’d eat.”

Rowling went next: “Well, I’d take Harry, to apologize to him.” Contemplating further, she said, “I’d have to take Harry, Ron, and Hermione.” But then it became clear that she had fallen into another trap. “See, I know who’s actually dead.” Ah, so does this mean that Harry, Ron and Hermione all survive the end of Book Seven, as we all hope?

King urged Rowling to “Pretend you can take them anyway,” whether the characters are alive or dead. “Well, then I would definitely take Dumbledore,” Rowling said. People in the audience called Hagrid’s name, and Rowling acceded to their wishes: “I’d take Hagrid, yeah. And Owen because he wouldn’t take up much space.”

Irving put Dr. Larch, Owen, Patrick Wallingford from The Fourth Hand, on his guest list. He also listed three of his female characters, “Melanie, Hester, and Emma, who would probably burn the house down, but I’d be interested in meeting them.”

Then O’Brien thanked the authors and questioners, King thanked the audience on behalf of the two charities, and the festivities were over. As the lights went up, I discovered I was seated right near a side door that opened directly onto the sidewalk outside, so I was able to make a quick exit without being swallowed up by the thousands who were all leaving at once.

I’m not the only person who took a long time to write about the evening. On Sept. 13 in the diary on her official website (http://www.jkrowling.com/), Rowling started off by apologizing for not writing on it for so long (“Sorry, sorry, sorry, sorry, sorry.”) Despite her onstage trials, she declared that the shows with King and Irving “were so much fun” and “I would have happily done a third night. . .the crowds, both nights, could not have been more wonderful.” Likewise characteristically, she also “belatedly” came up with the question she had never been asked, and posted it elsewhere on her site (http://www.jkrowling.com/textonly/en/extrastuff_view.cfm?id=23). But Rowling doesn’t answer the question, because apparently it would indeed give away an important plot point.

People have rightly marveled that three authors could draw an audience that filled the vast Radio City Music Hall and that reacted as if they were rock stars. Only afterwards did I reflect that The Music Hall seats 6000 people, but the San Diego Con’s infamous Hall H holds 6500. Ah, but could any Comic-Con guest fill Hall H nearly twice over? That’s what Irving, King, and Rowling accomplished over two nights.

ADVERTISEMENTS FOR MYSELF
Only a week after the previous session of my lecture series, “1986: The Year That Changed Comics,” I’m doing another one, on Monday, October 2, at the Museum of Comic and Cartoon Art in New York (www.moccany.org), this time about Art Spiegelman’s Maus.

-Copyright 2006 Peter Sanderson

Nocturnal Admissions: DVD Review; The Texas Chainsaw Massacre with Gunnar Hansen interview

Filed under: Columns,Nocturnal Admissions — UncaScroogeMcD @ 11:50 pm
nocturnalheader5.gif

If you’re like me – that is, barely able to keep up with the new movies and DVDs, thus without the luxury to dip back into the past – than you probably haven’t seen The Texas Chainsaw Massacre in a long time. I know I haven’t. Therefore the film came as a renewed surprise. Not only was it even better than I remembered it, but the film is surprisingly, at least by today’s standards, minimal in its violence and gore. What TCSM does accomplish, however, and still effectively, is to create a mood, at atmosphere of unrelenting terror.

Chainsaw box

Joe Bob Briggs has probably written the definitive history-analysis of TCSM, reprinted and expanded for his book, Profoundly Disturbing, and there is at least one whole book, an oral history, dedicated to the film ( The Texas Chain Saw Massacre Companion, by Stefab Jaworzyn, from Titan books), and Robin Wood has explored its implications as far back as the early 1980s. All that I can do, on the occasion of the film’s reissued on DVD by Dark Sky Films in a two disc ultimate edition, restored and re-mastered according to the box (street date Tuesday, September 26, $29.95), is to explore some of its discreet effects.

Chainsaw gagged victim

Joe Bob points out that TCSM reverses the traditional trajectory of cautionary tales people watched in the first part of the century, in films such as Sunrise, i.e., that the country is pure and that the city is corrupt and destructive. Here, a band of teens take a trip into the country and are, mostly, destroyed by the corruption and isolation of the vast plains of Texas. Briggs might have added that in its way TCSM is a film soleil, that is, a horror noir like Val Lewton’s horror noirs, but set in the bright sunshine of the suddenly ominous great outdoors, with lawn mowers in the background and breezes rustling the hay and the wash drawing on a line. Very little of TCSM actually takes place in the dark, indeed even indoors. Cars, woods, country roads – these are the sites of most of TCSM‘s horrific events.

Not only is the film a horror soleil, but it is a comedy. As with Hitchcock’s Psycho, there are in jokes, perhaps put in place to relieve the tension of the set. But ultimately like horror films, or at least the best horror films, are really comedies, or, in the case of Frankenstein, tragi-comedies. In fact I might be willing to argue that the greatest horror film of all time is Abbott and Costello meet Frankenstein, because it so explicitly a balancing act between authentic humor and legitimate horror.

Chainsaw's Neal

In TCSM, the whole of the state is nuts. The film starts out with eerie noises (the film’s music and sound production is superb, one is delighted to be reminded), and a man is apparently creating a sculpture out of recently unearth human parts, the same incident reported on the news simultaneously. Soon we learn that the whole of Texas is crazy, and the film creates a mood that links the current events of the film with Charles Whitman and the JFK assassination. This is a state, in the film’s view, in which bored citizens start visiting graves when the desecration hits the news, turning the event into the occasion for a festival. The scuzzy man (Edwin Neal) who created the body part art gets into the teen’s van shortly thereafter and scares the heck out of them with his odd way of talking and his ritual worship of and fascination with blood (yet he is also strangely appealing to at least one of the passengers).

Chainsaw lawn

One of the best sequences of brooding suspense occurs when two of the kids make their way at last to the house of horror (in the past a neighbor of relatives of some of the kids). As they trod up through the yard to the house, they pass benign house hold items, yet a buzzing in the air is ominous, and The 2003 remake produced by Michael Bay got this part of the film just right.

The comedy elements of the film come into full view, as it were, behind closed doors, where the family is truly horrific, as well as unpredictable, and funny in their outrageous way, bickering as if they were a normal American family, and didn’t have bones and bodies and stuff corpses littering the rooms. The effect of the film lingers for hours, if not years, later, as Sally (Marilyn Burns) manages to escape but is reduced to a quivering heap, while the Chainsaw family is injured but still there. Tobe Hooper and his collaborators leave it there, stopping in media res as so many subsequent horror films were to do, hinting at sequels and letting the horror living beyond any false conclusions on the screen.

Dark Sky offers up this DVD of The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (the film’s fourth iteration in the medium) in a widescreen anamorphic, 1.78:1 frame taken from the original 16mm elements. The disc has subtitles in English and Spanish under English, Dolby Digital 5.1, Dolby Digital 2.0 Stereo, and English Dolby Digital 1.0 tracks.

Chainsaw Tobe Hooper

Disc one of the two disc set has several supplements, beginning with a new audio commentary by actors Marilyn Burns, Paul A. Partain, Allen Danziger, and art designer Robert A. Burns, which is moderated and highly informative (two of the participants later died). The disc also reprises an earlier commentary with director Tobe Hooper, cinematographer Daniel Pearl, and actor Gunnar Hansen. The supplements conclude with trailers, and TV and radio spots.Disc two includes the 73 minute documentary “Texas Chain Saw Massacre: The Shocking Truth” plus the 74 minute documentary “Flesh Wounds,” which would tell you all there is to know about the film were it not for the existence of a third making of doc out that not included on this box. In other extras, Gunnar Hansen takes the viewer on a tour of the Texas Chainsaw Massacre house, and the disc ends with deleted scenes and outtakes, a blooper reel, a stills gallery, and even outtakes from “The Shocking Truth,” which provide even more information.

Chainsaw Gunnar Hansen

I had the chance to interview Gunnar Hansen via email on the occasion of the film’s 32 anniversary release. Hansen, who was born in Iceland, is now a poet and editor living in Maine, with a sideline in acting and documentary making. Here are the results of the interview:

What is the role of the horror film in mass culture these days? And if that role has changed in 30 years, how has it altered?

These days horror films are big again, with bigger and bigger budgets, after a long period of decline. I don’t think that horror ever declined for real fans, but it certainly did for the general public. I think these cycles of interest are what horror has to suffer through. At the time Chainsaw came out, horror movies were pretty much moribund after a couple of brilliant flashes in the 1960s – Psycho and Night of the Living Dead. Chainsaw changed all that. Horror movies got interesting again. Then as the cycle came all the way around, most horror fillms started getting dull again. (Call me old fashioned, but Scream just doesn’t do it for me.). Now, finally, we seem to be in a strong revival, and once again horror films are back into the mass culture. What excites me about this is that their popularity means that maybe soon a new Tobe Hooper will come along and redefine horror again. It’s about time.

What do you think of the fact that the movie is both a cult hit among horror fans and a darling of high brow critics such as Robin Wood? It suggests that despite its roots in horror it has great universal appeal.

I’m glad to see that the movie holds up well for both ends of the critical spectrum. From a horror fan’s point of view, it delivers the goods – it is disturbing and scary and entertaining. At the same time, for the critic, it has resonance (as a critic might say). It can be seen as being about more than just the surface story, and it has enough substance (and technical niceties) to it that it bears up to close examination. It’s well constructed and compelling – and it is appealing on so many levels. Rex Reed called it the scariest movie he had ever seen. At the same time there were plenty of people who hated the movie. In 1977, Harper’s published an article called “The Pornography of Violence,” in which the writer called Chainsaw, “A vile little piece of sick crap with literally nothing to recommend it.” And this kind of attention, of course, only gave it more exposure and extended its audience. But it’s funny to me that so many high-brow critics now want to claim it as their own. I have read articles saying, in effect, “When Chainsaw came out, it was almost universally ignored. Only a few of us perceptive film theorists understood its depth.” Which of course is a load of road apples. The movie was a hit with the public from the first day; the high-brow film academics had to play catch-up.

Since you are masked throughout the movie, I imagine that few people “recognize” you on the street or within the biz. Has that been a help or a hindrance in your subsequent career?

I don’t think that the mask has meant much one way or another for my career. (It has, though, been a convenience, since I like not being recoginized on the street.) I never really intended to have a career as an actor. I tried out for the part of Leatherface because I was curious to learn about what it was like to work on a movie. Once the movie came out, I continued to pursue a writing career. The mask didn’t affect that. But, of course, Chainsaw‘s success meant I was getting offered new roles. I finally gave in, and in 1987 started working in films again. And, again, the mask didn’t matter. What mattered was that I had played in a very successful horror movie, and I was being offered horror roles. And that was just fine with me.

The cult flavor of Chain must have taken all of you by surprise. By this time, though, over 30 years later, do you wish the film would just go away?

Yes, Chainsaw‘s cult following really did surprise me. I had hoped that the movie would be successful enough that after a few years a few hard-core fans would remember it. I never imagined more for it. All these years later, though, I really don’t wish the movie would go away. I’m proud of it and my chance to be part of it. Its cult status has allowed me to act in other films and now and then attend a horror fan convention. And at the same time, I am able to do the other work I love – writing.

Who is your favorite poet? If there is only one. Or, rather, Who is your favorite poet right now?

Right now it’s probably Wallace Stevens. But there are others whose names have been popping up lately: Andrew Marvel, Donald Hall, Philip Larkin.

Who are some of your favorite writers in general?

Non-fiction writers: Bruce Chatwin, E.B. White, John McPhee. I don’t know whether I have favorite fiction writers, other than the obvious, Herman Melville. Some favorite novels include Par Lagerkvist’s The Sybil, Jerzy Kosinski’s Painted Bird, and Gabriel Marquez’s One Hundred Years of Solitude.

Which is worse: pretending to kill people with a chainsaw, or editing the copy of writers for publication?

Editing copy. At least bad copy does now and then make me dream of oiling-up the saw.

Once you got into it, what was one big thing about the movie business that took you by surprise?

I assume we’re talking about the movie business, rather than movie making. So often it seems to me that people in the business really don’t say what they mean. You either learn quickly to devine the meanings, or you spend a lot of time wondering what really got said at that last meeting. To slightly rephrase George Burns, “The secret to success in Hollywood is sincerity. Once you can fake that, you’ve got it made.”

Interview: Jonathan Coulton

Filed under: Interviews — UncaScroogeMcD @ 11:36 pm

-By Ken Plume

coulton 01.jpgCyber-troubadour Jonathan Coulton is an evil, evil man who must be destroyed.

Why this call to action? Because he’s immensely talented, an amazingly gifted songwriter, and his incredible creativity both intimidates a normal, ungifted person like myself and drives me to distraction with catchy tunes and wordplay.

Damn him to hell, I can’t stop listening to his music.

That includes his first album Smoke Monkey, his first EP, Where Tradition Meets Tomorrow, and the first collection of his online songwriting experiment, Thing-a-Week.

Coulton ends his epic, year-long “Thing a Week” series of songs today with #52 (which makes sense, when you think about it).

He’s also currently criss-crossing the country with legendary raconteur, humorist, DAILY SHOW correspondent, humanitarian, and author of The Areas Of My Expertise, John Hodgman. Like The Monkees before them, they could be coming to your town.

You can purchase all of his discs, plus other merch, as well as partake of more sonic goodness at www.JonathanCoulton.com. While you’re over there, be sure to check out the other 51 Things – and pick up his CDs. And pledge your life to him. That talented bastard.

I had a chance to talk to Coulton about all things Thing, his groundbreaking use of the internet, and how the paradigm shift affects him as an artist. Of course, this was after I mistakenly called him on his cell instead of his land line, allowing me to immediately launch into completely self-effacing mode…

—————————————————————–

JONATHAN COULTON: Hello?

KEN PLUME: I did get the correct number now, right?

COULTON: Ah. There we go. Perfect.

KP: See, that’s how we start off an interview poorly on my end.

COULTON: (laughing)

KP: Can’t follow directions, probably did very little research…

COULTON: That’s right. I’ve deducted all sorts of points already.

KP: Yes. I did not know I’d be judged.

COULTON: (laughing)

KP: It’s like so many other things in my life.

COULTON: Always, always.

KP: Now I see how this is going to go…

COULTON: Yeah.

KP: Well, now that I know I’m being judged…

COULTON: You gonna rewrite some of your questions?

KP: You’re quite uh, a witty, handsome fellow.

COULTON: (laughing)

KP: And I brought an apple. Well, I’ll have to work on that, I guess.

COULTON: Yeah, do your best.

KP: Well, I’ve already completely thrown that out the window, so I’m just gonna coast now. Uh, so, as far as, have you ever… you’ve obviously read the interview that I did with John (Hodgman), so…

COULTON: I have, yes.

KP: You’ve got a sense of how poorly these things can go.

COULTON: Yes.

KP: So, really, it’s all on your shoulders.

COULTON: Yeah. No pressure though, right?

KP: No, none at all.

COULTON: Yeah.

KP: It’s not like writing a song a week for a year.

COULTON: Yeah. For instance.

KP: Which I think is a lot more pressure, when you come down to it.

COULTON: Yeah, it was a lot of pressure. There were some weeks that were absolutely excruciating. I mean, there were certainly some times when an idea would come to me early on in the week and it came together by itself and I was done by late Thursday morning, and I could relax. But then there were other weeks where Friday at 2 in the afternoon I still had no ideas. Or maybe one idea that I hated.

KP: What would you do with the hated idea? How many of those actually made it to finished form?

COULTON: Quite a few of them. I found that a pattern developed near the end of the cycle, which is that I would get an idea, and I would recognize the moment when I was at the bottom of the trough. When I hated the idea the most, when I doubted myself the most… when I was entirely confident that this would never ever become a song. And I actually learned to recognize that moment as not a true thing. Because even the ones that I hated, when I plowed through, and when I wrote them – when I forced them to become full songs – most of the time I liked them pretty well.

KP: So, was that just a feeling born of stress more than anything else?

COULTON: Yeah, I think it’s stress, and I also think it’s just the…

KP: Standard artistic doubting?

COULTON: Well yeah, it’s that, and it’s also when you see any nugget of a song out of context, it’s not that great. You know? Every piece of a song is strengthened by the rest of it, so when you have one silly line about somebody who likes to… “Mr. Fancy Pants, who always has the fanciest pants.” It’s easy to say, “Oh, well, that sucks. You can’t make anything of that.” And then a few stressful hours later, you have a song a minute and a half long.

coulton 02.jpgQS: So what would be the biggest turnaround in your feelings on a song? If you were to choose one that completely went a 180 on you?

COULTON: Good question. I have to look in my songlist. I have to go to my website. What’s my website now?

KP: I believe it’s jonathancoulton.com.

COULTON: Ah, yes, thank you. I’m going to the songs page, where I can see all of the songs that I’ve written and listened to, because I like…

KP: I believe people can even purchase CDs of those songs on that page…

COULTON: Yeah, you can even purchase CDs from there if you want to. Oh, you know what the biggest turnaround was? I know the answer to this question, actually. It was a song called “When You Go,” which was one of those things where late in the week I didn’t have very many ideas. I had one that I really liked very much, that was sort of dull and hokey, and I wrote it all the way through and that song… I love that song. And I really was, I think a very… it’s not a very upbeat song. It’s a pretty sad breakup song. And I think that the sadness within that song came from the sadness in me not being able to write anything that week.

KP: I think one of the interesting things when you look at the 52 song cycle, is that you pretty much cover just about every emotion, genre, thought…

COULTON: Well, you would have to.

KP: You would think.

COULTON: (laughing)

KP: Considering the construction process, what would be then the easiest song that came to you? One that you had done by, let’s say, Monday?

COULTON: “Shop Vac” came to me that way. “Shop Vac” was… of course, that was early on in the process. That was when I wasn’t feeling much pressure at all, but yeah, that song came to me when I was actually using a shop vac on the roof to vacuum up some leaves and mud and stuff, and just kind of whistling to myself, enjoying my time alone with my shop vac.

KP: As men are wont to do.

COULTON: As men are wont to do. And it occurred to me, “When did I become this person?” The chorus sort of popped into my head fully formed, and then the rest of it came pretty easily. That was a quick one.

KP: Where do you find inspiration comes from most – a lyric or a melody?

COULTON: I found myself writing two kinds of songs. There are ones that spring from a lyric and a character, and that moment of inspiration is usually one of these fully formed things where there’s a… I’ll get a lyric and I know who’s speaking and I know what’s motivating them and why they’re saying that. And then I can write around that character.

KP: Like a “Mr. Fancy Pants” kinda thing.

COULTON: Like “Mr. Fancy Pants,” right. Or “Shop Vac,” or also the… “Re: Your Brain” was like that, too. The chorus of that, all we want to do is eat your brain. That came to me, and I pretty much knew who was talking. I knew that it was a zombie. I was imagining a zombie saying that and I was imagining that his attitude was, “What’s the big deal? Why can’t we work this out?” And so the rest of it just became fleshing out that character.

KP: No pun intended.

COULTON: And there are other songs that are much more musically based, and a lot of these came later in the year when I had sort of run the gamut of all the robot and monkey songs I could think of.

KP: And yet you still surprised yourself.

COULTON: (laughing) And I still surprised myself. And sometimes it’s the music that… it starts with the music, and then I sort of fill in words until I get some sort of a story.

KP: Do you find yourself gravitating musically towards certain kinds of chords or progressions that are sort of an identifier of a “Jonathan Coulton song”?

COULTON: Oh, god, absolutely. I’m so sick of them. I’m so sick of writing sad songs in D, I can’t stand it.

KP: Yeah, that should be the title of an album.

COULTON: (laughing) Yeah, I have a… I’m sure it’s the same for every guitarist, but I have what I consider to be a bag of cheap tricks that I use over and over again in different ways. And certainly writing a song a week, you start to see your patterns pretty quickly. So I would find myself, to keep from writing the same song over and over again, I would have to just put a cap on the guitar and just play the same chords but way high up on the neck. Or I would have to force myself to write a song in the key of E this week. “Let’s do E. We haven’t done E in a while.” (laughing)

KP: You should have just gone for the key of life.

COULTON: Well, that’s true, that’s worked out well for someone, didn’t it?

KP: Yes, I believe it did.

COULTON: That was Stevie Wonder.

KP: You need to go that direction. Not the blind direction.

COULTON: (laughing) No, not the blind direction.

KP: But you keep vacuuming up on the roof like that who knows what could happen.

COULTON: Yes, it could fly into your eyes.

KP: Yeah, see? Have some kind of vac accident.

COULTON: (laughing)

KP: Would you say that you made any musical discoveries about yourself during the process? Like, “Oh, it surprised me that I can go to that place…”

COULTON: I did. There were a couple of songs… I feel like I’ve learned a lot about my voice through all of this. Maybe part of that is learning to record it better. I don’t know. But I feel like I’ve discovered both the highs and the lows. I discovered that I can… how to really work a slow sad song with my voice, and also how to push it a little bit and make it sound a little more… oh, I don’t know, rock ‘n’ roll. Not that I sound very rock ‘n’ roll ever, but there were a couple of songs that I surprised myself at how much more dangerous I was able to get my voice to sound than usual.

KP: So you think it was just a matter of forcing yourself to go to those places?

COULTON: Yeah, that it was really just having the confidence to sing out loud and scream when necessary, and not worry about the neighbors hearing me.

KP: Is that what had prevented you before then?

COULTON: I think that’s a lot of it. It’s very hard recording in Brooklyn in an apartment building. It’s noisy. There’s noise coming in from everywhere. And it’s also, you can hear people through the wall on the other side, so you know that when you’re singing at the top of your lungs for the fifth time in a row because you can’t get the lyric right, a line about zombies wanting to eat brains, you know that somebody on the other side of the wall is saying, “What is going on?” It can be a little intimidating.

KP: But that’s what gives New York its character.

COULTON: (laughing) That’s true. And the museums are terrific.

KP: And now they’ve lost at least one of those things.

COULTON: I know! What’s happening?

KP: It’s people who want to go off and have roofs.

COULTON: I know (laughing). Totally unreasonable.

KP: I know. You’re gonna have to someday rectify to them. Now they miss you, I’m sure.

COULTON: I’m sure, I’m sure.

KP: They’re probably visiting your site every day.

COULTON: Yeah…

KP: “Remember the zombie guy? We go visit his site.”

COULTON: (laughing)

KP: Going back to the beginning, what was the initial impetus for doing the “Thing a Week”?

COULTON: Well, you know it actually came from… when I was wrapping up my day job – I had this day job writing software – it was the last few weeks that I was working there…

KP: What kind of software were you writing?

COULTON: I wrote in Visual Basic.

KP: Oh, I remember that well.

COULTON: Microsoft SQL server. It was a database for executive recruiting firms.

KP: Wow. Accounting wasn’t good enough for you, huh?

COULTON: No, no. I’m not an accounting schmuck.

KP: No, no.

COULTON: I’m about the recruiting.

KP: Numbers – no.

COULTON: I’m a people person. Which is why I wrote software for people.

KP: Yes. For people to use to find other people.

COULTON: Yeah. And so I was near the end of my time there and everybody knew that I was going, and I was talking to a coworker of mine, and he said, “What are you gonna do?” And I said, “I don’t know. I really don’t know!” ‘Cause I didn’t have any plan at all.

KP: Starve…

COULTON: Yeah. I sort of wanted to starve and not do anything for a little while. I was leaving specifically to try to do some music, but I didn’t have any specific plan. And he said, “You should write a song a week for a year.” And I said, “Ha ha, that’s insane, you could never do that.”

KP: “And now I leave you. Good day, sir.”

COULTON: Yeah! (laughing) And I sort of laughed it off and said, “Oh that would be amazing, but I can’t imagine that I could possibly do that.” And then a few weeks after I had stopped working, I said “Well, why not try doing a song a week for a little while, and see what happens?” And it wasn’t even gonna be a song, it was gonna be maybe an idea or a little sketch. A little interesting guitar part that I liked.

KP: Hence the “Thing” part instead of…

COULTON: I didn’t want to call it “Song a week” ’cause I felt like there was too much pressure. And I think the very first one was kind of this throwaway experimental thing… and then the second one was a song, and then the third one was a song, and then it was all over. I couldn’t go back.

KP: At what point did you feel locked into it?

COULTON: You know, I think not until… not until maybe 15 songs in. When I could actually see the halfway mark to a year… when I could actually start thinking about, “Oh, I might write 20 songs, I might write 25 songs, I could write 26 songs. That’s half a year.” Then it actually felt like a possibility to me.

KP: So, in other words, when you stopped looking for an easy way out.

COULTON: Exactly. Yeah. And that’s actually when it became a lot more difficult, I think. I think I was writing a lot more easily in the beginning.

KP: When you thought you did have an exit.

COULTON: Yeah, when I thought I could stop at any time, and when nobody was really paying any attention. And then every week more and more people were listening, and every week it was closer and closer to the possibility that I could go for an entire year.

KP: Well, I mean, the beautiful thing is that you also hit this perfect zeitgeisty moment with the rise of stuff like Boing Boing and YouTube and ScreenHead, and blogs in particular, to where you have this entire sort of rapid fire network by which these things can be shared with people.

COULTON: Yeah. I wish I could say that I thought that through and that that was part of my plan, but…

KP: It’s not like you were recording stuff on an answering machine or something.

COULTON: Yeah! (laughing)

KP: I mean, that’s so low tech.

COULTON: What kind of fool would do that?

KP: It’s so twentieth century.

COULTON: Yeah, exactly. But they did that every day.

KP: Yeah, well, that’s just nuts.

COULTON: Yeah, but it was also – they were not full songs.

KP: Yeah, not until you bought the album.

COULTON: Yeah, right. Then you realized that they… (laughing)!

KP: No but you really just hit this unique pocket whereby.. I mean, look at something like the Second Life concert you did, where that wasn’t even feasible technologically a year ago.

COULTON: Yeah. No, that’s very true. And it’s funny to see… and I’m not trying to claim credit for this movement, but…

KP: No, go ahead.

COULTON: I think that independently I think a lot of people have come up with the same idea of doing any sort of art on a regular… on a suicidally regular basis. There’s people who do a painting every day.

KP: Well I’m doing “Chat a Week” now.

COULTON: You’re doing “Chat a Week”?

KP: Yeah.

COULTON: What’s that?

KP: I have no idea yet.

COULTON: Oh. Fantastic.

KP: But get back to me in a year.

COULTON: (laughing)!

KP: You can buy the book.

COULTON: I mean, you can call it web 2.0 or whatever you want to call it, but I agree that the blogging world has gotten really big in the last couple of years, and podcasting has had this meteoric rise. And I credit those guys a heck of a lot for the number of listeners that I now have. I mean, it’s basically airplay on national radio, except there’s no radio involved.

KP: Well it’s not even national, it’s international.

COULTON: It’s international, yeah.

KP: At what point did you feel the momentum being taken from something that you were having to sort of push to all of a sudden it had a life of its own?

COULTON: I think when… well, early on, “Baby Got Back” was sort of a phenomenon. That was my first real taste of what a viral hit could do. By which I mean, take down your site. And that was very exciting, but it was like crack. Because it felt so good while it was happening, and then 24 hours later it was just gone. (laughing) It was this huge spike, and then back down to the levels where I was before. And so that was my first taste. And then I think somewhere after Christmas… well, there was “Flickr,” which was the next really big hit. And that’s when I started to notice that the tone had changed a little bit, and that people were speaking of me, writing of me, as if they expected the reader to know who I was. You know what I mean?

KP: Right.

COULTON: It wasn’t like, “Here’s this guy Jonathan Coulton and here’s what he does.” It was like, “Oh, Jonathan Coulton just did this.”

KP: “Here’s his latest.”

COULTON: Right. And that’s when I started to feel like there was definitely something going on out there.

KP: How does that feel?

COULTON: It felt terrific. It really was so, so validating. That’s why it’s so hard to stop Googling yourself, because you… if you’re lucky, you come across a complete stranger who’s saying these nice things about you who thinks that you’re a famous person. And it’s really…

coulton 03.jpgQS: So what was the longest, most disturbing Googling session you’ve ever done…

COULTON: (laughing)!

KP: Because we all know that’s where it leads. Sitting there for three hours going, “Oh, I’ll go to Classmates.com. See if they…”

COULTON: Yeah. No, it’s true. Well, you know, I have a whole routine that I go through every morning, which involves pushing as many things back out of my inbox as I can. Making a list of the things I don’t get to so that I can get to them later. And then doing the same on MySpace. Getting emails, accepting friendship requests…

KP: That’s a horrible phrase when you actually think about it.

COULTON: Oh, I know. It’s gross. It’s disgusting. I hate MySpace. You know, I feel like I gotta do it. Um, and then… then I’ll go to Technocrati, see what posts have come through, and of course you know that every time I get alerted about a trackback to an entry on my site I check out the context, ’cause I have to see what they’re saying about me. So yeah, it’s easy to get lost.

KP: I often wonder in this day and age of stuff like MySpace and approving friends and Googling yourself, what would Charles Schulz have written if he had done Peanuts and Charlie Brown now…

COULTON: (laughing)!

KP: Would it be a Valentine’s Day card, or would it be, “Why haven’t you approved me?”

COULTON: (laughing)! I think you’re absolutely right. Although you know, I gotta say, I don’t know…

KP: “No one approves Charlie Brown.”

COULTON: (laughing)! No one approves Charlie Brown. “I’m not gonna approve that blockhead.”

KP: Yeah! Meanwhile, Snoopy’s friend list is stratospheric. “How do you even get a laptop up there?”

COULTON: Yeah. I don’t even know if MySpace is gonna last long enough to have that kind of cultural resonance. I mean, I guess there’s always gonna be a thing like MySpace, but I don’t know if it’s always going to be MySpace.

KP: I think it’s gonna be one of those things where eventually it’ll collapse, but the idea of it will carry forth and people will always refer to it as a MySpace kinda thing.

COULTON: Yeah, that’s probably true.

KP: There’s a chance Google could disappear.

COULTON: Yeah, sure.

KP: Remember searching with Hotbot?

COULTON: Absolutely! Nobody could imagine Hotbot ever going away.

KP: That’s the smart one. You don’t use Yahoo.

COULTON: No, Yahoo sucks.

KP: And Google, what the hell is that? Not even a word. And this is just, what, 10 years and all this has gone by the wayside?

COULTON: I know. And it’s just gonna get faster and faster until we’re all replaced by robots.

KP: I find it encouraging that when you have so many flash in the pan endeavors on the internet, that you could have the consistency for “Thing a Week” over what, in modern time, is quite a huge span – and actually build the audience and build the reputation. Now you have people waiting with baited breath as to how it’s all going to end and what you’re going to do next.

COULTON: Right. Yeah, it’s been great. I would quibble with you on the suggestion that I’ve been consistent. I certainly don’t feel like I’ve been very consistent at all.

KP: Here’s the way I look at it: in this day and age, if you’ve finished it, you’ve been consistent.

COULTON: (laughing) Right!

KP: Because look at all the abandoned husks across the net.

COULTON: It’s true.

KP: Of Danny Bonaduce and Willie Aames fan sites.

COULTON: That’s very true. Just lasting for a year doing anything is a pretty…

KP: Actually completing a stated goal…

COULTON: Yeah, that’s true. A friend of mine who’s a professor of English literature, of all things, was talking about these shows, CSI, and he said, “It’s interesting – the heroes of the stories that we’re telling ourselves now, these are people who solve these crimes by using the tools that they have in an effective way, and by going over every inch… and all they have really is competency. But that somehow has become the heroic thing to do, is to be competent.”

KP: It has elevated them above the new norm.

COULTON: Yeah. They’re the only ones that have the patience to go over a room inch by inch with an ultraviolet light looking for blood splatter.

KP: That should be your byline: “Jonathan Coulton, Competency in the Modern Age.”

COULTON: (laughing)! Yeah! I like that.

KP: That’ll be the box set.

COULTON: That’ll be the box set, right.

KP: Which you have just about enough for at this point.

COULTON: I do.

KP: Are there plans to collect all four volumes?

COULTON: I’m trying to figure out a way to do it from a manufacturing perspective. I’m going to make all four CDs, and they’ll all be available for sale separately. I’m trying to… I haven’t actually begun to investigate this in any real way, but I’d like to find a way to have a box that I can put these CDs into and that will also have enough space for… Len Peralta is the guy who has a podcasting job on radio, who’s been doing a drawing for each song. He hasn’t done them all, but he started pretty early on. And what he and I would like to do is put those into a booklet, a sort of program guide. And then put that in the box with the four CDs. I need to find somebody who will be able to make that box and… it can’t be too expensive.

KP: No. And it’ll say Born to Run on the front.

COULTON: And it’ll say Born to Run on the front. It’ll say The Beatles.

KP: The Coulton Album. Surely there must be somebody out there.

COULTON: I’m sure that there is, I just have not begun to Google it.

KP: Or there’s always Tupperware.

COULTON: That’s an interesting idea. Just get those Glad disposable Tupperware containers.

KP: Yes. In fact, the uniqueness alone might be worth it.

COULTON: Or maybe a Ziploc bag.

KP: It’s got to be with the slide zip.

COULTON: It would certainly be cheap.

KP: It would be cheap. Especially with the holiday season coming up, are there any plans for anything special along those lines? You’ll have the first two out by the end of the year, right? The first one’s out, second one’s about to be out…

COULTON: The first one is out, the second one will be available for sale in a matter of days. Numbers three and four I hope to have within a month or so. I’m trying very hard to get all four of them out in time for the holidays.

KP: So, basically, it’s the perfect gift.

COULTON: Oh, it would make such a great gift for almost anyone.

KP: And anyone who doesn’t want it as a gift can certainly find someone who would.

COULTON: Yeah. Even if you give it to somebody as a gift and they don’t like it, I’m sure they know somebody who’d like it, and they could give it to them as a gift.

KP: Yes.

COULTON: You can’t go wrong.

KP: In fact, it’s the perfect re-gift.

COULTON: It’s the perfect gift, it’s the perfect re-gift, it’s the perfect thing to give somebody just to make the guilt go away, and they can throw it in the garbage.

KP: I like that as a tag line; “Makes the guilt go away.”

COULTON: “Makes the guilt go away. Throw it in the street, I don’t care. I’ve got your money.”

KP: Yes. That’s also a good tagline.

COULTON: “I’ve got your money.” – Jonathan Coulton.

KP: Yes, in fact, all of your receipts, when people actually order the stuff, should say that.

COULTON: Right. “Thanks, sucker.”

KP: I thought that’s what the secret track is on the end of every album. That’s the backwards one.

COULTON: (laughing)!

KP: So, everything out by the end of the year. What’s your sense now, coming to a close after you’ve run this gauntlet?

COULTON: It’s very complicated. I feel very proud to have done it, and sort of amazed that I was able to do it at all. And very glad that I did it, because there are so many good songs in there that I think I never would have written otherwise. But I’m also a little afraid… I’m relieved to stop because it’s exhausting, but I’m also a little afraid to stop, because this has become my thing now. And I’m not sure exactly what I do after this. The business model such as it is, I don’t know to what extent it’s worked because I was writing a song every week. I don’t know what happens to the money and the fans and the blog links when there’s not new content every week. There certainly will be new content. I will continue to write songs, just not on a certain schedule.

KP: So you think “Thing a Fortnight”…

COULTON: I think a fortnight or maybe something every now and then.

KP: I like that title.

COULTON: Catchy.

KP: Yes.

COULTON: And explanatory.

KP: Actually kinda whimsical.

COULTON: It is a little whimsical, you’re right. And so I don’t know what exactly to do next. One of the things I would like to do is sit back and take a little break, and let whatever happens next emerge as organically as possible. That’s how I got doing the “Thing a Week” is by quitting my job without any plan and letting myself sit still for a couple of weeks.

KP: So basically just letting it gestate and emerge when it feels like it.

COULTON: Yeah, exactly.

KP: Is there any worry about taking that approach again? It’s not like you’ve emerged out of doing programming again. You essentially did what you wanted to do…

COULTON: Yeah. Yeah, I think there’s… there’s definitely a feeling like, I need to keep pushing and pushing and pushing. So yeah, it doesn’t feel 100% correct to lay off. But I may find that what comes next is actually going back and pushing and pushing again. And take a few weeks vacation and then a “Thing a Week 2.”

KP: So you’re gonna write that rock opera then, is that what you’re saying?

COULTON: Right. I’ll do the rock opera, and then I’ll do a song for every site on the internet.

KP: Or do it as a film. A modern Rocky Horror.

COULTON: Thinking of this cyclical stuff, Ze Frank’s The Show, it’s just amazing. He does that every day. Or every weekday.

KP: I can barely do a podcast every couple of weeks.

COULTON: Yeah. I have a lot of respect for that.

KP: Of course, I’m inherently lazy.

COULTON: Me too.

KP: Yes, but you still managed something.

COULTON: Yeah, but I feel like a week, you got a little leeway. You can do it on any of those five days. But every weekday it’s like, oh god, the days when you wake up and you don’t want to do anything, too bad.

KP: Yeah. But I guess that’s how normal people work.

COULTON: Maybe that’s true. Maybe it’s just you and me that have trouble.

KP: Yeah. Now I’m kinda feeling bad. Anyone reading this is gonna go, “Buncha assholes!”

COULTON: “Why don’t they just do their damn job?”

KP: “And then they complain! ‘Oooo! I don’t know if I want to work today, creating…’ “

COULTON: (laughing)! You’re right, that’s pretty loathsome…

KP: “I might just sleep in or go up and vacuum, I don’t know.”

COULTON: “Yeah, I don’t know, whatever.”

KP: “Look at a tree.”

COULTON: “Let’s see what’s on television. I’ll wait for the next thing to come to me.”

KP: “I’ve never seen this Law & Order.”

COULTON: “Oh wait, yes I have. Zzzzzz….”

KP: “Well, no Thing this week. Got some sleep.”

COULTON: “At least I made all those meatballs.”

KP: “Ran into town. Got some mail. Catching up on email.”

COULTON: You’re describing my life.

KP: “And approving friends.”

COULTON: Yeah. That’s pretty much it.

KP: “So you work, what, 12 hours a day? Oh, I’m sorry. How did you lose the arm? You think they’d have a sign. Must make the work harder, no arm and such. Have you heard my music?”

COULTON: “Check it out. Last year I worked on it pretty hard. This year, not so much.”

KP: “I got four CDs worth.”

COULTON: Yeah. “Now I’m just gonna coast.”

KP: Now I feel really guilty. Not only have I made myself feel bad, but I’ve made you feel bad.

COULTON: You’ve made me look bad, too.

KP: Yeah I kinda did that, too…

COULTON: Yeah, take out all that stuff where we bash the working man. Leave that out if you would.

KP: Yeah, well, you have association with a friend of the working man, John Hodgman.

COULTON: Yes. An interesting way to describe him, yes.

KP: Actually, you can pretty much describe him as anything.

COULTON: That’s true. He’s an expert on all things.

KP: He’s kinda like Galactus that way. I think everyone perceives John differently.

COULTON: Yeah. I would agree with you.

KP: I don’t think there’s any one true John Hodgman.

COULTON: No. It’s hard to pin him down, ’cause he’s a true chameleon.

KP: How did that association between the two of you begin?

COULTON: Well, we went to college together. We were in the same dormitory. We were friends starting freshman year, and friends all through college, and…

KP: What was he like in freshman year?

COULTON: The same. He was pretty much the same. John Hodgman has always been sort of an old man. I didn’t know him, but I understand that when he was a freshman in high school he carried a briefcase to high school.

KP: Wow.

COULTON: I know!

KP: And yet he’s not British.

COULTON: And yet he’s not British.

KP: He seems like the type that would love a dormitory type school.

COULTON: Oh, sure. He was always very well spoken and very funny and devastatingly dry. But he did have incredibly long hair.

KP: That, I can’t imagine.

COULTON: Yeah. Which he always kept in a tight little bun in the back of his head.

KP: That’s kinda disturbing me.

COULTON: Yeah, it was really weird.

KP: If you’re gonna have long hair as a man, I’ve never seen the bun look really catch on.

COULTON: No. Grow it and show it, you know?

KP: Ponytail, yes. But bun?

COULTON: Yeah, it was… he’d hate that I was saying this.

KP: I gotta know if there’s photos.

COULTON: I’m sure there are plenty of photos. But it was always incongruent, because occasionally you would see him with it down, it was like, “Wow, who are you?” Because he always seemed like the button-down smarty pants. But, of course, we’ve been great friends for a long time, and my circle of friends and loved ones here in New York contains many people that I have met through John. In fact, I’m married to a woman who went to high school with John.

KP: So, really, he’s a master matchmaker as well.

COULTON: Yeah. He’s the hub of the giant wheel on which we all spin around. My wife is saying, “No, I’m the hub.”

KP: Yeah, you’re married now. You better get it right.

COULTON: (laughing)!

KP: So in other words one day someone’s gonna construct this John Hodgman Venn diagram.

COULTON: Yeah.

KP: With John at the center.

COULTON: It’s gonna be like that Kevin Bacon game.

KP: I think it’s already the Kevin Bacon game.

COULTON: Yeah.

KP: In fact… my god… now I’m part of it.

COULTON: Yeah, except it’s just John in the center of a circle, and that circle’s in the center of another circle, and it’s just circles within circles, all the way down.

KP: It’s like the most disturbing MCI commercial ever.

COULTON: Yeah. Friends and family, and in every one of those circles is John Hodgman.

KP: Yes. “Do you know John Hodgman? Do you know THE John Hodgman?” In fact, that should be the new campaign – “Of course you know this man.”

COULTON: He needs to get an American Express ad, that’s what he needs.

KP: If they still did those.

COULTON: They should go back and do those ads just so they can give one to him.

KP: He should just do that as a viral video for the books.

COULTON: He should do it anyway and see if he can get paid after the fact.

KP: Yes. You need to suggest that to him.

COULTON: Yeah.

KP: ‘Cause he doesn’t listen to me anymore.

COULTON: No. Well, me either.

KP: How could he not listen to you? You’re going to be sharing a road trip together.

COULTON: Well, that’s true. I’m actually looking forward to this a great deal. It’s a fortuitous thing is that the song 52 is posted on Friday the 29th, as the very next day I fly to Chicago to be on tour with John for about a month. It’s like the end of the old thing, and then this great vacation around the country.

KP: Perhaps you should write a song a city, like They Might Be Giants did.

COULTON: Oh, like the Venue Songs.

KP: Yes. But for the book tour instead.

COULTON: But for the book tour, yeah. I’m really looking forward to it. It’s always fun…

KP: See, that’s the sad thing, and I just did it to you. Be brutally honest – does it irritate you a little bit that, from now on, people are gonna be asking you, “So what’s the next “Thing a Whatever”?

COULTON: Yeah, well, I am a little worried about that.

KP: And I’m guilty of it, and I apologize.

COULTON: No, not at all. I think that it’s only natural to ask that kind of question. I wish that I did have another fantastic project to do, but I don’t have one yet. I may come up with one, but we’ll see. I might just sink into obscurity.

KP: No.

COULTON: I don’t know.

KP: No… Websites never die.

COULTON: I guess that’s true.

KP: You might not produce a single new thing, but all those songs will still be out there.

COULTON: That’s true.

KP: If Geocities sites can still be out there…

COULTON: Right.

KP: Your stuff will still be around in perpetuity. Or at least the cyber equivalent of it.

COULTON: One of the benefits of being something of a small fish is that there are always new fans. I think somebody like U2, they’re not gonna get a lot of new fans over the next year. Maybe they are, but not as many as I am. I’ve got nothing but new fans.

KP: It’s also the type of thing that, again, utilizing the technology the way it is, all someone has to do is drop an email or an IM to somebody and say, “Hey, check this out.”

COULTON: Exactly.

coulton 04.jpgQS: Are you going to continue to archive the “Thing a Week” songs as free downloads, or are you going to take them down as the CDs go up?

COULTON: I think I’ll probably leave them up there. I can’t see much of a reason to take them down. I do believe that having this stuff available for free – optionally, you can buy it if you want. I think that that has certainly helped me, and the whole creative commons license, you know, it’s licensed in such a way that you can, in fact, put it on a mix CD and send it to your friends. And I wish you would. I wish every one of my fans would do that right now. Then I would have almost twice as many fans. Presumably there would be some people who didn’t like it.

KP: Yeah, but that’s one of the main points of a mix CD – just to expose someone to something.

COULTON: Exactly. You can pass that one. But I think that there’s no question in my mind that the place that I’m in, being an independent musician and not having a huge marketing engine behind me, having that stuff available so that people can listen is just incredibly valuable to me.

KP: Well, it seems also in this day and age, and maybe you’ve experienced this, that the need for something like a publicist has been greatly reduced.

COULTON: Yeah.

KP: Because you have a lot more one-on-one interaction, and people seek you out who actually want to do features.

COULTON: Yeah.

KP: So you know that whoever contacts you is going to want to definitely do something with you.

COULTON: Right, exactly. I think a lot of the traditional pieces of the puzzle are no longer…or less necessary. I’ve had some discussions with some label type of people here and there… or not label people, but people in traditional parts of the industry. And I always come away from it… you know, I’m always excited by hearing from somebody official, you know?

KP: Right.

COULTON: That’s always nice, just for the establishment to say, “Oh, you’re doing good stuff, let’s talk,” you know? But then I always come away from it saying, “Well, huh, I wonder if doing something official like this would benefit me, or if it would be worse.”

KP: Do you find that you crave that sort of traditional legitimization?

COULTON: I do. I do. I crave that kind of validation from the establishment.

KP: Because I noticed the link on your website, that if you’re someone official, please contact me.

COULTON: Yeah (laughing)! Yeah.

KP: Which I’m surprised doesn’t flash or something.

COULTON: (laughing)! Well I think it’s still… I’m torn about what the role of those people is going to be. I don’t know. I think it’s all still in flux.

KP: It seems like it’s now come down to almost adding an unnecessary middle man.

COULTON: Yeah.

KP: Your interaction with the public is right there now for you.

COULTON: Yeah, it’s true. And so the question is, how much value do you actually get from a middle man?

KP: Which is also based on a traditional retail model, where labels were needed get the record in the stores …

COULTON: Right.

KP: When now there’s no need for bricks and mortar.

COULTON: Yeah. I make so much more money off the MP3s than I do off the CDs. An enormous amount. Much more. So yeah, the idea of moving CDs is not as important. But at the same time, having somebody who can be a booking agent, and call venues and set that up and negotiate that stuff – you know, that’s worth something to me. I’m not particularly interested in spending my time on the phone and talking about money and stuff.

KP: Right.

COULTON: And I also think radio is still pretty important. It’s very hard to get airplay on the actual radio without this crazy direct cold-calling thing. You have to send your CD out and follow up, and, “Have you played it? Are you gonna play it?” You know you have to really push and push and push. Or pay somebody to play it. That’s done all the time as well. I think there are still ways that the establishment can benefit an artist. I haven’t figured out exactly what I want my relationship to be with that part of the business, but luckily it hasn’t come up yet.

KP: Do you feel that need for validation has lessened over time, or is it still pretty constant?

COULTON: Well, it’s pretty deep rooted. You know, it’s like wanting a parent to love you. It’s hard to give it up. (laughing) I certainly have started to think, “Oh wow, maybe this way of doing things actually can work.”

KP: You’re not on a rivet gang.

COULTON: Well, it’s true. And in some parts of the country, I’d be making a decent living. I chose to live in one of the most expensive cities in the country. I don’t know why I did that, but…

KP: Particularly doing what is essentially an internet-based thing. You could live anywhere.

COULTON: I could live in a hut on the top of a mountain somewhere. Well, I’d need broadband.

KP: Yes, and approval from your wife.

COULTON: (laughing)! But yeah, it’s true, I could do this anywhere. As I say, if it were a different part of the country, it’d be a pretty good living.

KP: But it’s not bad.

COULTON: No, it’s not bad at all. I have nothing to complain about, believe me.

KP: I mean, you’re not in the apartment building.

COULTON: That’s right.

KP: If you were to identify a handful of goals besides the mainstream validation, is there anything that’s left unfulfilled for you right now that you’re still chasing down?

COULTON: Uh… uh… huh. That’s a good question. I would like… I would like to be right. I would like to be undeniably correct about the idea that giving music away like this is beneficial. One of the reasons that I did it is I was… I saw Larry Lessig speak about Creative Commons. He was the founder of Creative Commons. And it was the most moving Power Point slideshow I’d ever seen. I was really just so jazzed about the idea, and it was such a beautiful idea, that I really wanted to be part of that change. I felt the need to be a kind of pioneer. I don’t know that I am a pioneer. There are plenty of people who have been doing this long before I’d even heard of it, but I like the idea that I’m part of something new, and I want for that new thing to continue being the new thing.

KP: Why do you believe that it has worked? If you’re looking for proof that it has, why do you believe it hasn’t? What in your experience so far gives you doubt?

COULTON: Well, I think it has worked for me. Maybe it’s just my own self doubt. I think the place that I’ve gotten to is pretty amazing, given the amount of work I actually did. I think the business model has shown itself to be pretty effective.

KP: What do you mean by the work you actually did?

COULTON: Well, I mean, you know, I didn’t do all this traditional knocking on doors and…

KP: Yeah, but the fact is that when you are a creative person and your endeavors are creative, then the measure of the creativity is in the output.

COULTON: Right.

KP: And by any stretch of the imagination… I mean, there are some bands and artists that can’t get an album out in a year, let alone 52 songs…

COULTON: Sure.

KP: … plus already having an album and an EP in a catalogue.

COULTON: Yeah. When I say work, I’m talking more about phone calls, live shows, sending CDs. Trying to get publicity, that sort of thing.

KP: But you also had a concert recently that just sprung up practically out of nowhere that surprised you, didn’t it?

COULTON: It did, yeah. That was really nice.

KP: Was it Seattle?

COULTON: Seattle, yeah. I was going to Seattle to do something with John for Bumbershoot, and at the last minute I discovered that I was actually gonna be there for the whole weekend. I thought that I was gonna come back to the east coast, but that fell through, and so on Wednesday I posted on my site, “Hey, if anybody can find me a venue that’s open on Saturday night, I’ll play it,” and several people came back to me with several different options, and they had already called the booking people and said, Yeah, they’d love to have you play, just give ’em a call,” you know? And so I picked one of them, and decided to do it there, and it was a packed house. It was great. It was like 80 people there.

KP: So, then, what makes you think that the process isn’t working?

COULTON: It just needs to be more overwhelming. I need to have overwhelming evidence. That’s what it is. I want to be able to show these statistics to somebody, and have them go, “Oh my god. We were so wrong.”

KP: So, then, why don’t you do a city experiment? Look at what your open days are, pick a handful of cities, and do the same experiment with those cities?

COULTON: That’s one of the things I’d like to try, and actually, as I’m going on this tour with John Hodgman over the next month, I’m setting up shows in a few cities that I’ll be in anyway, and I’m doing that based on this site called Eventful.com, which is where people can go and sign up to indicate that they would like to see me perform a show in their city.

KP: And there’s a link off your site to that.

COULTON: There’s a link off my site for that, right.

KP: I believe it’s the “dance, monkey” link.

COULTON: The “dance, monkey” link, that’s right. And so I’m gonna pick the biggest cities, or the cities with the most number of demands, and when the schedule works out and when I can find a place to play, I’ll play there. And yeah, I want to continue that experiment and see if that can continue to be as successful as it was in Seattle. Because that’s the other thing, is I feel like, you know, I’ve only been attacking one angle, and that is the music distribution side, and sort of this viral promotion. But I think there’s also room for this same kind of model, a web 2.0 model if you will, in the area of live performance.

KP: I think it takes the guessing game out of a traditional tour.

COULTON: Yeah. Absolutely. And it’s like anything else, Metcalfe’s Law, the value of the network increases exponentially with the number of users, or something?

KP: I obviously stopped at the Peter Principle.

COULTON: The more people that actually use this model, the more valuable it becomes. If venues know that they can depend on that number translating into actual…

KP: They’re not dealing with empty seats on a night…

COULTON: Right. ‘Cause that’s the whole thing, it’s convincing a venue who’s never heard of you that you’re actually gonna be able to put asses in seats.

KP: Right.

COULTON: And so, you know, suddenly if the venue believes in it, and if the fans believe in it, and if the artists believe in it, then suddenly it’s real.

KP: Have you ever gone to the UK to do any shows?

COULTON: No I haven’t. There’s a fan of mine who I’ve never met who actually started a website called the Jonathan Coulton Project, which is dedicated to collecting and posting music videos for my songs. And he lives in the UK, and he has been trying to set up a tour in November for me. I’m not sure it’s gonna come through.

[Interviewer’s Note: What followed was a long exchange during which I discovered that Jonathan did not know who Neil Innes – the songwriter behind the Rutles, member of the Bonzo Dog Band, and tunesmith of many a Monty Python song – was… I was shocked.]

COULTON: Nope.

KP: Oh, come on!

COULTON: I don’t know! I’ve been writing a song a week for a year.

KP: You make it sound like a hermitage!

COULTON: It is! It’s terrible! So glad it’s over.

KP: Your musical monastery.

COULTON: That’s right. Only listening to my own music.

KP: Yes.

COULTON: And Cookie Monster singing “C is for Cookie.”

KP: How could you not?

COULTON: Yeah.

KP: Where’s your cover of that?

COULTON: Yeah (laughing)! I kind of wanted to do Mr. Rogers’ “You are Special.”

KP: Oh, that would be beautiful.

COULTON: I love that song.

KP: So have you had any thoughts whatsoever as to what immediately will follow the end of “Thing”? I mean, what do you think of the people going, “Well, we wanted you to end with one of your original songs for #52 instead of a cover…”?

COULTON: I say to those people, “Why don’t you write a song a week for a year, and then see if you can finish with an original song. And then get back to me.”

KP: It wasn’t a criticism as much as a hope, in that people thought it would be more poignant.

COULTON: You know, it would be, but it also… I can’t… I just can’t imagine it not being sort of a let down. For me, anyway. And it would just be so hard to do. I had such a hard time writing this last one because I knew that it was going to be the last original song of “Thing a Week.”

KP: And yet you couldn’t tell. I have to admit, it seemed pretty effortless, and is actually a very nice tune. So I could not tell the blood and sweat that went into it.

COULTON: Oh, thank you for saying that. That’s nice of you. It turned out okay, but it was really… it was pretty hard. And it was just the pressure of knowing it was the last one that… you know, it’s like, whenever you look at a series of things, you’re gonna look at the first one and the last one.

KP: Do you see a progression between the first and the last you’ve done? If you look at week one and then week 51?

COULTON: Yeah, I do. I feel like a very different songwriter from when I started. It’s hard to put my finger on how exactly.

KP: Would you characterize it as better?

COULTON: I would characterize it as better. I’ve gotten better in a number of places. I feel like I’m playing the guitar better, I feel like I’m singing better. I’m much better at recording things than I was when I started. The production and mixing has gotten better. And I’m also better at… I feel… I don’t want to sound too high-falutin’, but I feel like a better craftsman. I feel like I’ve sort of gotten the handle on some of my skills that I didn’t have before. And that now I know that if I need to I can sit down and actually make a song out of nothing. Whereas I think when I started, I was used to just waiting for things to happen.

KP: So at what point are you doing tune for hire?

COULTON: (laughing)! I don’t know about that. That’s even more pressure.

KP: “Hundred bucks, I’ll walk away and give you a thirty second tune.”

COULTON: I just set up a booth at a county fair.

KP: Yes, yes. That’d be perfect.

COULTON: Yes. Come back in an hour, I’ll have a thirty second song for you.

KP: Yes. “No change.”

COULTON: Yeah, no change.

KP: “Oh dangit, the musician’s gone…”

COULTON: “I was gonna buy a song…”

KP: “Time for skee ball.”

COULTON: “Ah, he’ll be back.”

KP: A hundred bucks worth of skee ball. That kid could have walked away with a tune.

COULTON: That’s right. Oh well.

KP: And now it’s just disappointment in his heart.

COULTON: Now it’s just 25 or 30 tickets and a cheap plastic ring.

KP: That’s an heirloom.

COULTON: If you take care of it.

KP: Pass that down to your kids. What are you gonna do with a song? A song that’s all written in D.

COULTON: Yeah. The same boring crap.

KP: “What the hell’s all this about a robot? I wanted to be about my girlfriend.”

COULTON: (laughing)! “Dude, it is about your girlfriend. It’s deep, it’s deep.”

KP: Yes, you gotta look for the layers.

COULTON: Right.

KP: It’s all about layers.

COULTON: It’s a metaphor.

KP: “No refunds. Did you see that sign?”

COULTON: Yeah, “No refunds. Get out of here.”

KP: It’s right below “No change.” So, I mean, overall – what’s your overriding emotion? Accomplishment, sadness…

COULTON: Accomplishment, I would say. It’s a combination of the pride of accomplishment and the relief of not having to do it anymore (laughing)! I’m going to be very happy to have a few weeks where I don’t have to have a new song on Friday. It’s just gonna be nice not to have it hanging over my head. I also am very proud of this work. I think there are a lot of great songs in there.

KP: I was listening to the entire lot of them over the weekend…

COULTON: It’s a lot of music.

KP: It is a lot of music. It’s a lot of music to do work by.

COULTON: (laughing)!

KP: I mean that in a good way!

COULTON: Oh, thanks.

KP: You know, there’s music that you don’t want to do work by.

COULTON: Right, right.

KP: But this was music that you could actually… there’s nothing I skipped, let’s put it that way.

COULTON: No, I understand.

KP: Which coming from someone who’s skip-happy and has 70,000 songs sitting here…

COULTON: Yeah, it’s a huge compliment.

KP: Yeah. I could have easily have turned on a George Harrison tune, maybe some Paul Simon.

COULTON: Sure.

KP: AC/DC. Well, probably not. Probably some Simon & Garfunkel. So no, there were other options there.

COULTON: These are all my niggas…

KP: Yes, your peeps.

COULTON: My peeps.

KP: Your posse.

COULTON: Yeah.

KP: Your songsmithing posse.

COULTON: Yeah.

KP: We’ll have to work a better terminology for all this. You know, for when you have that big charity concert, or one of those horrible middle-of-the-night jam sessions…

COULTON: Oh god.

KP: Where everyone gets together and fights for dominance.

COULTON: Yeah, where there’s like eight guitars on stage at the same time.

KP: 14 drummers.

COULTON: Yes.

KP: And Ringo.

COULTON: Right! (laughing) Poor Ringo.

KP: Who I hear is doing “Snare a week.”

COULTON: (laughing)!

KP: Really, I think you’ve started a trend.

COULTON: I would be thrilled if a real rock star did a weekly song. It would be amazing!

KP: I will make you a gentleman’s bet – a single dollar – that within the next, let’s say… wanna go three or six months? Your choice.

COULTON: Let’s do six. ‘Cause I’d like you to win.

KP: Within six months, that will happen.

COULTON: Alright.

KP: You will have a major person step forth, and claim the idea as their own.

COULTON: (laughing)!

KP: In international press.

COULTON: It could be.

KP: And that man will be Elton John.

COULTON: (laughing)!

KP: And it’s all gonna be versions of “Candle in the Wind.”

COULTON: (laughing)!

KP: So, a gentleman’s bet.

COULTON: Gentleman’s bet, alright, you’re on.

KP: And if I lose, I will Paypal it to you instantly.

COULTON: You can send me a dollar.

KP: And if I win, I want some kind of elaborate design on mine. And a signature so I can frame it on my wall of shameful deeds.

COULTON: You got it. You’re on.

KP: So was the interview painful?

COULTON: Uh, no, it was not very painful at all.

KP: Was it what you were expecting?

COULTON: I can’t remember a single thing we talked about.

coulton 05.jpgQS: Even better. Because I honestly wasn’t listening to you.

COULTON: Good, good, That’s a relief. I don’t think I said anything. Did I?

KP: No. I think at one point you did pretty much insult just about every single race there was.

COULTON: That’s fine, I do that from time to time.

KP: But hey, they’re fine with it.

COULTON: Hey, I’m just bein’ real, man.

KP: It’s all about people living together.

COULTON: Yeah.

KP: And nobody’s gonna read this anyway. So, really, you’re not sticking your neck out.

COULTON: Right, right.

KP: Do you want to say anything else about economic policy or the war?

COULTON: Um, no thank you. No thank you to the war, and no thank you to the economic policy.

KP: You know, all criticism in this country should take a more gentlemanly approach like that.

COULTON: Yeah!

KP: “No thank you.”

COULTON: “No thank you.”

KP: No “War is bad,” or “Stop the war” – just, “No thank you.”

COULTON: “No thank you, we would not like to go.” That’s what they should have said about Vietnam.

KP: Or, “I’ve had my fill.” No one uses that phrase anymore.

COULTON: (laughing) I’ve had my fill.

KP: It’s the kind of thing you should say with white gloves on.

COULTON: “I don’t care for it.”

KP: Yes. “It’s not my cup of tea.”

COULTON: Right.

KP: Another phrase that’s fallen into disuse. You know, if we ever let this into John’s hands, they’d be full chapters in his book.

COULTON: Oh, that’s true. Well, they will be anyway, even if we don’t tell him about it.

KP: Because the other thing is, he knows all.

COULTON: Yeah, that’s true.

KP: You know, inclosing, you really should just throw down the gauntlet to everyone else, and have them do a “Thing a Week.” Everyone else in the world.

COULTON: Yeah.

KP: “Hey. Bring it. I brought it. A year.”

COULTON: “Shut the fuck up, motherfuckers.”

KP: “I did a year of bringing the shit. What are you bringing?”

COULTON: Right.

KP: “Show me.”

COULTON: Give me something.

KP: “Justify your existence to me now.”

COULTON: Do it for two weeks. Do it for one.

KP: Do a thing, period.

COULTON: Yeah! (laughing)!

KP: That should be your drive for, like, the nation’s children.

COULTON: Get everybody to do a thing a week?

KP: Yes. Or just a thing, period.

COULTON: Just a thing, period… Yeah.

KP: “Jonathan Coulton’s Do Something.”

COULTON: Do Something.

KP: That’s a campaign that could take off. You could be on the Today Show, on CNN…

COULTON: Yep.

KP: “So how’d this all start?” “Oh, I did this music thing and it’s like, you know what? Other people should do things.”

COULTON: Right.

KP: “You know, the people are just sitting there doing nothing.”

COULTON: Just like that Pay it Forward movie.

KP: Yes, exactly. It can be just as treacly as that.

COULTON: My fingers crossed.

KP: And Haley Joel Osment can actually work with you as part of his work release.

COULTON: Oh, god bless that sweet beautiful boy.

KP: Yes. And the telephone pole that took him out. I didn’t say that. I’m sorry. It was actually the alcohol that took him out. The telephone pole had nothing to do with it.

COULTON: Yeah yeah. An innocent bystander.

KP: So I guess I’ll be seeing you sometime next month.

COULTON: Yeah. I’m back literally the 31st…

KP: Are you in a neighborhood now? Are you going to be doing the whole Halloween thing?

COULTON: Well, we’re in Park Slope, so there’s actually a Halloween parade that goes on here. So yeah, there may be some festivities happening.

KP: You’ll be the only guy giving out songs to kids.

COULTON: Yeah, right? “Hey kid, you like monkeys?”

KP: A little CDR to each of them. “Yeah, put this up on your MySpace.”

COULTON: “Link back to me, okay kid?”

KP: “I know you got ’em. And approve me, for chrissakes.”

COULTON: “Thanks for the add.”

KP: Well listen, it’s been a real joy talking to you.

COULTON: Well, it’s been fun. I certainly appreciate the willingness to say important things about me on your important website.

KP: Well I’m all about lies.

COULTON: (laughing)!

KP: Seriously, though, I would not have done it unless I actually wanted to feature you and get the word out.

COULTON: That’s very nice.

KP: And did fully respect and get a kick out of the music.

COULTON: Well that’s good.

KP: So know that I don’t feature people that I dislike.

COULTON: That’s even better. 100%.

KP: So yes, your songs are in full rotation, and I hope that you get something planned for the future. Because I can only listen to this stuff so much.

COULTON: You’re gonna need another 52 songs pretty soon.

KP: Yes, I need that sequel to “Re: Your Brains.” Like Harry Chapin did with “Taxi.”

COULTON: Oh god. Oh god.

KP: You know, revisit it a couple of hours down the line.

COULTON: Yeah, just see what happens.

KP: Yeah, why not? Some kind of post-apocalyptic, Omega Man kinda thing.

COULTON: Yeah.

KP: You know, he set up a house, and yet his coworker’s still coming after him. Every once in a while he’ll see him outside the gate when he’s up there shop vaccing.

COULTON: Yeah. Or maybe the tables have turned.

KP: You know, maybe the tables have turned.

COULTON: Maybe he’s got the zombie captive now.

KP: Yes, so actually it’s a memo replying to the reply.

COULTON: Yeah. “Re: Re: Your Brain.”

KP: Yes!

COULTON: Song #53.

KP: Yeah, I’ll pay you a dollar.

Quick Stop Thingamabobs: 9/28/2006

Filed under: Columns,Thingamabobs — UncaScroogeMcD @ 6:02 am
thingamabobs.jpg

The web. It’s a big place, full of plenty of distractions ““ some funny, some informative, some ludicrous, some disturbing, some inane, some profound. Each and every weekday, we present links to a few of our favorite finds”¦

————————————————

  • I find bloopers delivered in a British accent to be doubly funny. (Thingamabob)
  • What in the hell is Mattel thinking? What exactly is the audience for this toy? I fear what lies behind the door this product is opening. (Thingamabob)
  • Screech. Sweet Jebus, please say this is some elaborate joke. Some horrible, horrible, horrible joke. Please. (Thingamabob)
  • I still don’t know what to make of the film behind this trailer, but I think I like what I’m seeing. (Thingamabob)
  • Vintage Beastie Boys, circa License To Ill. (Thingamabob)
  • I spent over an hour here. I’m not proud. Roger Wilco fans represent. (Thingamabob)

Have a THINGAMABOB? Send it in!

Music For The Masses: September 28th, 2006

Filed under: Columns,Music for the Masses — UncaScroogeMcD @ 5:43 am
musicmasses2.jpg

Hello there, friends! Welcome back! I hope all is well. Boy, I gotta tell you that, me personally, I am absolutely tickled pink right now. Know why? Of course you don’t… unless you have some kind of satanic, mind reading skills like that Chriss Angel (here’s a “MindFreak” for you… I think that MIGHT be a guy!) or one of them Scientologists. No… I’m tickled pink that I was actually able to find the PERFECT gift for my new girlfriend with absolutely ZERO help from anybody… including her. Yep, I did it all on my own. I’m a big boy today! How cool is that? Seriously, friends, she has NO idea how close she came to getting the old, M.C. “standard…” a George Foreman® grill and some Isotoner® gloves. Whoops! With Kwanzaa just around the corner, maybe I shouldn’t have written that. Oh well, screw it. This is just too cool… I have to share. After all, it’s not everyday that you can find a gift for a “loved one” that will help them share in your personal passions. Here… check it out:

M4M-IBUZZ-SEP28

That’s right, friends… you are looking at an iBuzz®, the first, music-activated sex toy. Pretty cool, huh? Here’s what it says on their web-site: “iBuzz® is the musical orgasm machine! The music-activated vibrating bullet stimulates you in time with your favorite music. Which song pushes your buttons?” Gee. . .that’s a hard question, iBuzz©, but I have an answer. . .anything from Michael Bolton’s “Sexual Mullet” phase. Time, Love & Tenderness? I’m almost “there” just thinking about it.

M4M-BOLTON-SEP28

Seriously, how cool is this gift? Rhetorical question! It’s damn cool. Oh, and in case you’re wondering, those two, purple, “jellied things” up there… the ones that look like something a smoker would hack up. . .yeah, well those are actually a “knobbled, stimulating sleeve for her enjoyment©” and a “spiked, cock ring sleeve for his enjoyment©.” Two gifts for the price of one!! Now don’t get me wrong, friends. This isn’t one of those gifts that I really wanted and just “saying” that I’m getting for her. I really am buying it just for her. You see, now she can find her own, damn “little man in the canoe,” because frankly, I’m sick of trying. Hell, I’ve been looking for a week now and the only help she’s given me are the shouts of “IT’S NOT IN MY BUTT!! IT’S NOT IN MY BUTT!!!” Leave no stone unturned, says I.

I’m telling you, she’s going to LOVE this. And the best part of this gift, by far, is that it’s going to open the door for some other “items” I’ve been kicking around getting her like that Sybian®-thing Howard Stern is always talking about or even… umm, horseback riding lessons. Hey, whatever gets her where she needs to get going without wasting all MY time. Know what I’m saying? The way I figure… I’m set for gift ideas through Valentine’s Day.

But enough about all of that. It’s time to check out some new releases. This week, we spin the new ones from New Found Glory and Mozella, Double A checks in with the soundtrack to a video game and, as a special treat, my meth-cookin’ cousin, Jay Dee, checks in with a review of the new Mars Volta. Should be fun. So, what do you say? Let’s get to it, shall we??!!

M4M-MOZELLA-SEP28 Artist: Mozella
Album: I Will
Bastard Love Child of: David Gray, Macy Gray and a drum machine.
Best for: Massaging your emotional wounds at the demise of the WB and UPN.

About a week ago, I was smack dab in the middle of an hour long, commercial-free drive home sponsored by Ford Motor Company when I get a call from Keifer Sutherland. The following events take place between 5:00 PM and 6:00 PM. . .

M4M-24-SEP28

“Dammit M.C.! Pick up your Motorola phone!!” shouts Keifer.

“I did pick up my phone, Kweefer!” I shout back, giggling like a school girl at our little, inside joke.

“Dammit M.C.!! I don’t have time for this, dammit! I’ve just been shot, electrocuted, brought back to life and I’ve killed 18 people and it’s not even dinner time yet… Dammit! AGHHH. . .My 2007 Ford Excusion is about to run out of gas and the battery on my new Motorola Slivr is almost out of juice.”

“Ummm… okay,” I respond tentatively, unsure where Keifer is going with this.

“I need you to re-position the Sirius satellite for me… now… so that you can pick up the signal that I’m sending you.”

“Dude… I have no…”

“Dammit, M.C. … just do it!! And don’t tell Chloe about this… lord knows I don’t need her being an even bigger gash because I asked you to do something for me instead of her.”

“Gash?”

M4M-KEIF-SEP28

“Dammit, M.C. … pay attention!!! We don’t have time for this. I still need to sneak on that plane, kill 24 more people, get blown up… twice… brought back to life… hell, I still have to save that small village before noon!!!”

Playing along, I respond, “Okay, man, sure. Whatever you want. What’s up?”

“You gotta check out this song I just heard. I’m uploading it now.”

“Okay… got it.” I lie.

“Pretty sweet, huh? Her name is Mozella…”

“Yeah, sweet. I love that movie where she’s fighting Mothra and…”

“Dammit, M.C. Quit messing around. I need you to go and check out her whole…”

“HA!” I interrupt.

“… album… Dammit M.C!… listen to her whole disc and do a review. If you don’t…” his words hung… umm, well?

“Okay, Kweef… whatever you say. I’ll get right on it. Consider it done.”

“Yeah… thanks.” His voice softer now, “Look, M.C. … I gotta go. Tell Kim… tell her I love her…”

“Sure thing, man…” I say into the dead phone.

M4M-MOZ-SEP28

So, mostly out of fear of getting shot in the knee-cap by Keifer, I picked up the new Mozella CD, I Will, and listen to it I did… a bunch… and, I gotta say, pretty impressive, Keifer. Sure, her sound is reminiscent of Norah Jones, specifically Come Away With Me, but no wonder you picked her song “Amazed” to be on your Celebrity playlist and that Mercedes Benz picked the song to back their 2005 ad campaign. Mozella’s overall sound is “Klassy” with a capital “K.” Hell, I would have picked that song, too. Of course, I probably would have put “Amazed” on this debut disc, but, hey… what the hell do I know? After all, up until last month, I thought Lance Bass was straight. Who knew? I just thought he had a keen fashion sense, solid hair-product knowledge and a butt-load of flair. I’ll refrain from getting into what he has a butt load of now. Hey Oh!!!

Seriously, folks, with Mozella’s look, her sophisticated and slightly “pop-y sound,” impressive vocals, colored with soul and drifting between bluesy ingénue and jazzy seductress and those hip, urban beats. . .there’s a lot here to enjoy, whether you’re picking these tunes up for your play list or your national, marketing campaign. I tend to prefer my music with a bit more crunch, but the grooves on this disc are undeniable. Good stuff all around. The disc, as a whole, is solid with each track flowing easily into the next, but my personal favorites are the slow-grinding songs “Killing Time” and “Love Is Something.” But don’t take my word for it. If you want to get a good taste of what Mozella is all about and to see for yourself if you are into her sound, check out the first single, “Amnesia.”

Mark my words… you’re going to be hearing this song everywhere here in a couple of weeks.

M4M-MOZ2-SEP28

Rating: 3.5 out of 5. Giant Hoop Earings: 5 out of 5

M4M-NFG-SEP28 Artist: New Found Glory
Album:Coming Home
Bastard Love Child of: Blink-182 and Fall Out Boy
Best for: Proving that there is no good reason to stop beating a dead horse.

A few weeks ago, I saw a marquee, advertising an upcoming concert, which actually made me laugh out loud. You see, right there, in big, black letters, high above one of the busiest streets in Denver, a marquee proudly proclaimed “THE QUEERS w/ HARD-ON’s COMING SOON!!” I shit you not. What a double bill, huh? I was completely blown away… well, not literally. Never before had I seen two band names more perfectly suited to one another. And, as this type of shit usually does, it got me thinking of other bands I would like to see paired on a marquee like the “The PUSSYCAT DOLLS AND BUSH!!”, “THE FLYING BURRITO BROTHERS WITH THE FARTZ,” and, of course, “NEW FOUND GLORY-HOLE”. (By the way, if you don’t know what a Glory Hole is, ask a trucker… or former New Jersey Governor James McGreevey.)

M4M-CIRCLE-SEP28

Speaking of New Found Glory (nice segue, eh?), the “punk-lite,” Warped Tour darlings from Florida just released their 5th disc, Coming Home. And, being the giant sucker that I am, I bought a copy figuring what the hell, I’ll give it a spin for you, my internet friends because, well, because that’s what I do. . .when I’m not shopping on-line for used, celebrity panties. Now, before going any further, let me state for the record that I was not a fan of the band going in and, after several spins of this new disc, I can honestly say that I’m sure as hell not a fan now. In fact, after listening to this disc, I am now convinced, more than ever, that New Found Glory, A Simple Plan, Hawthorne Heights, Fall Out Boy and Taking Back Sunday are actually the same band and, if ever they should meet, there would be a tear in the time space continuum like that TimeCop movie with Jean-Claude Van Damme. Seriously.

M4M-TIME-SEP28

Now, to be fair, I fully realize that I’m not New Found Glory’s target market. I don’t wear wrist bands, I don’t wear a straight-brimmed baseball hat at a jaunty angle, both testicles have fully descended and I’ve never shopped at Hot Topic. Okay… I shopped there once. Bought a sweet ass bumper sticker that says “I Wish My Lawn Were Goth So It’d Cut Itself,” but I digress. But I honestly can’t see how even fans of this band would find this latest offering even mildly entertaining. Nothing on this album grabs you… not a beat, not a guitar lick, vocal harmony or melody. Nothing. Sadly, it’s like the band spent too much time trying to sound like everyone else, they forgot how to make music. Or at least they forgot how to make good music. Wait, what am I saying? They never knew how to make good music (see: Sticks and Stones, Catalyst or Head On Collision).

If you are a fan of the band, I know you’ve already lapped this album up. . .and for that, I am truly sorry. For the rest of you, especially those of you considering buying this crap, listen to the first single “Oxygen.” Like that? Not so much? Yeah, well, consider that track the shiniest peanut in the turd.

Rating: 2 out of 5

M4M-DOUBLEA-SEP28
M4M-DAN-SEP28

Let me get one thing out of the way so there is no confusion later on. I hate basketball. I hate it with a passion. I would rather go to an Indigo Girls concert than a basketball game. I would rather watch re-runs of the Rosie O’Donnell show than watch a basketball game. I would rather die than play basketball. Well, that’s not too much of a stretch, as being of the portly persuasion, playing anything would most likely kill me. But that’s neither here nor there. The basic fact is that if it doesn’t involve a helmet and grass or ice, I don’t consider it a sport. So imagine my surprise when I got excited about and ran out to purchase the soundtrack to the NBA video game 2K7. Go figure.

The only reason that I bought this album is that it was put together by Dan “The Automator” Nakamura. I’ve been a fan of Dan The Automator for a while now, and you should be too. Seriously, if you haven’t heard anything that he did with the Handsome Boy Modeling School, get off your ass and check it out. It’s more magical than something that is really magical. Like crack. Anyways, Dan the Automator is a production genius and I will heartily buy anything that he slaps his name on. Which is why I bought a basketball themed album. Sure there are a ton of great artists on this album but lets get one more thing out of the way, this IS strictly a Dan The Automator album. Guests like Ghostface, Mos Def and Hieroglyphics only make good things better.

M4M-NBA-SEP28

There are two main problems that I have with this album, the main being that all the songs are about basketball. All of them. I will refrain from going over how much I hate the game again. Luckily, a few of the songs seem more like “normal rap” than basketball tributes. The rhythms are great, but I may be a little tainted since I have a little “hetero man crush” on Dan the Automator. And for the most part, with a few exceptions, the rhymes are good. The song “Don’t Hate the Player” by Hieroglyphics is the best on the disc, mostly because the basketball references are more in the background rather than the main focus.

For a soundtrack to a video game, this is a damn fine disc. As a stand alone rap or hip hop disc, there are better out there. If you dig basketball and rap, then you will probably shoot your load all over this like Kobe on a white girl. If not, it is still worth a listen. Now if only the worlds of hip hop and hockey could form a cohesive unit. I know it’ll never happen, but a fat kid can dream, cant he?

 

Rating: 4 out of 5

REVIEWS. . .

by JAY DEE BELL

M4M-JEFF-SEP28

M4M-MARS-SEP28

Mars Volta

Amputechture

Mars Volta! Hell yeah! WHOOOO!!! Oh man”¦ this CD is crazy! I was there and doing the”¦ damn”¦ the CD just kicks ass. I mean, when I’m out there going crazy, totally all lit you know, the CD is going all over the place and crazy. Man!! And when I’m comin’ down the music is all slow and like”¦ you know, slow. That’s the thing man ““ it’s just there. And I’ll be talking to Gary and he’ll say some bullshit about how he knew the guys in Slipknot and I tell him he don’t know shit from shit man. That’s the thing. Gary thinks he knows all these famous types but he’s just a nobody man. He’s like that guy”¦

Yeah, so”¦ I just wish I knew what the chick was singing on this Mars Volta CD man. Fuckin’ crazy!! She’s all talkin’ and I’m like “what?” I always yell at my stereo “speak English motherfucker! Or get outa the country!” You know. Piss me off. That’s the thing. The guitars make me feel like I’m alive but not always ““ you know? WHOOOO!!!

Someday man I’ll get my band back together and we’ll cover some of these songs man. Like that one song “Viscera Eyes” or whatever. Man I love that shit. I was”¦ that’s the thing. You know? WHOOOO!!! Mars is the best!! That movie with Arnold Schwats”¦ man, I don’t even know how to pronounce that dudes name man. You know The Terminator. Shit man. That’s the thing.

Rating: 4 out of 5

Well, there you have it friends. That’s going to do it for me and the gang this week, so, until next time, keep wearing it proud and playing it loud!

Send the songs you’d most like to masturbate to, review copies, presents and assorted hate mail to:


M.C. Bell
P.O. Box 1222
Arvada, CO 80001

M4M-IBUZZ2-SEP28

E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES

The Fred Hembeck Show: Episode 74 – Soapy Slick

Filed under: The Fred Hembeck Show — UncaScroogeMcD @ 5:36 am

fredhembeckheader.jpg

Over the nearly four years I’ve been posting my blatherings on the Internet – not only here at “The Show,” but also at my Fred Sez blog – I’ve recounted both a wide range of personal minutia and offered up a hefty amount of unsolicited opinions, much of it centered on aspects of the pop culture of the past fifty years. Comics, movies, music, the tube, bat invasions – I’ve shared it all.

Well, ALMOST all. There is one little portion of my day to day life I’ve been consciously holding back. Holding back, that is, until now…

Confession time, friends: I regularly watch a daytime drama.

You know – a soap?

I’ve been reluctant to cop to this fact for any number of reasons, not the least of which is that, by admitting I faithfully follow a daily sudser, it pretty much negates my ability to convincingly strike a critical pose regarding any OTHER corner of the video landscape. Look, I don’t care all that much for reality programs, for game shows, for forensic and/or police procedurals, for trumped up wrestling match scenarios, or even low-grade sit-coms, but well, how can I possibly criticize ANY of these genres with any sort of presumed intellectual authority once my soap addiction has been entered into the equation? I mean, how could I, for instance, possibly badmouth any of the CSI programs (putting aside for a moment the mildly relevant fact that I’ve never actually SEEN any of them) and expect to be taking seriously?

“Aw, what’s HE know?”, folks will sneer, “HE watches soap operas!”

T’wasn’t always the way, effendis, but it has been for long enough now. To follow, then, an explanation of how such a thing came to be, and the somewhat surprising manner in which it affected several of my later key prime-time viewing decisions (and what I happen to think is a pretty nifty piece of trivia bringing this episode of “The Fred Hembeck Show” to a stunning conclusion! Yeah, yeah – I’m overselling, but how ELSE am I gonna get you to wade through all of this?…)

Ahem. Well, back to our subject.

My mother watched the soaps. She called them her “sketches”. If memory serves, Another World, Days of Our Lives, and the long-defunct The Doctors – NBC productions all – comprised her regular daily slate when I was growing up. Whenever I was around and they were on – summers mostly – I generally ignored the drone of the melodramas piping out of the tube, focusing instead on reading my beloved comics while mom’s attention was riveted on the video serials. Of course, while I maintained a silent contempt for mom’s viewing choice, the funny books I was immersing myself in – sixties’ Marvels most prominently – were little more than spandex-suited soap operas themselves, with the emphasis leaning a tad bit more towards the action than towards the romantic angle. So, looking back, it comes as little surprise that I eventually became hooked on the television equivalent of one of Stan Lee’s multi-issue epics. But it wasn’t one of my mom’s sketches that did it…

Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman, Norman Lear’s controversial syndicated soap-opera satire debuted in the fall of 1975, but not, as luck would have it, on any Buffalo, New York television stations. That’s where I was living at the time, finishing up my college education while sharing a ramshackle off-campus two story house over at 280 Stockbridge Avenue with five other fellows (new gal pal Lynn was also seen frequently in the environs). Although I had been a loyal viewer of much of Lear’s previous ground-breaking output (most especially All In The Family), there wasn’t much TV watching going on in that edifice in those days, so initially, the lack of access to this increasingly popular new show was hardly noticed.

fredhembeck 2006-09-28 01.jpg

Until one especially boring Saturday night, when a bunch of us were gathered around the tube, flipping through a far more limited array of channel choices than one is afforded these days. Suddenly, we stumbled upon the pig-tailed visage of star Loise Lasser, and out of curiosity – and frankly, because nothing else good was on – we backed away from the knob (no remotes for college students in those days, gang), sat back, and watched in fascination as Lear’s repertory company subversively turned soap opera conventions on their head – and better yet, offered viewers a sitcom with NO LAUGH TRACK!! Listening to each line, trying to pay close attention so as not to miss the absurd payoff to a typically banal conversation – this was just the kind of edgy entertainment that hip college students (and brother, that was us!) was looking for! Who knew we’d also get hooked into the serial viewing habit along the way?

(Y’see, MH2 was being broadcast from a Canadian border station, running the daily half hour show twice a week, with two episodes late Friday, and the remaining three on Saturday. Since we came in mid-story – and it wasn’t just me and Lynn watching, though we were probably the most loyal pair of viewers in the house – when news came that a Buffalo station would FINALLY be picking up the program and would be running it from the very beginning, the move was roundly applauded! The only drawback came later, when, in an effort to get on the same page with everyone else nationwide as the show’s second season commenced, they blithely skipped over Mary’s nervous breakdown on The David Susskind Show and subsequent stay in a mental health facility. I’ve always regretted being denied that heralded sequence, as well as a far less well known one: the final weeks of the retitled Forever Fernwood – revamped due to Lasser’s exit – which never played on their flagship New York City station (we’d moved downstate by early 1978, y’see) as the series Herculean 325 episodes drew to a close with little or no fanfare. Nearly thirty years later, I STILL wonder about the source of Mary’s daughter Heather’s visions that she was having down at the town gazebo, a dangling plot point the WNEW didn’t have the decency to allow hardcore viewers like myself to ever learn. Bah. And YOU thought my head was just filled with meaningless comics trivia! Hah! Little you know!…)

Naturally, since I’d found something I liked, I needed more. Lear himself provided it when, shortly after MH2 took the country by storm, he offered up “All That Glitters”, another five times a week soap satire, only this one had an extra helping of social commentary and fantasy heaped upon it: the premise here had all the women characters in positions of power, and all the men in subservient ones. In other words, a complete role reversal. The show was well done, and had a stellar cast – Gary Sandy, pre-WKRP In Cincinnati as the office boy toy, Linda Gray, pre-Dallas, as a transsexual, hunky ex-LA Dodger Wes Parker, and, in the role of the needy if somewhat slovenly “wife”, Chuck McCann!! – but the joke got pretty tiresome pretty quickly, and the show didn’t last past its inaugural season.

(Yes, I watched Soap too, the sitcom that brought Billy Crystal to prominence, but I don’t consider it quite the same thing, as only a couple of dozen episodes of that show were produced each season. It’s the unrelenting quantity as much as anything that marks the true soap viewing experience. And I never became a regular viewer of any of the prime-time sudsers (save for the latter seasons of Melrose Place) like Dallas or Dynasty – though many of the serialized night-time dramas I have watched – Hill Street Blues, ER, Gilmore Girls, Desperate Housewives, even Buffy the Vampire Slayer – all have undeniable soapy aspects.)

January 1980 saw a final, non-Lear, attempt at a satirical soap: L.A.T.E.R.. Here’s something that baffles me – I sometimes have to think twice to determine just what S.H.I.E.L.D., U.N.C.L.E., or T.H.U.N.D.E.R. stand for, but L.A.T.E.R.? Life and times of Eddie Roberts, naturally! And the thing only lasted three months! Geez, talk about your useless information….

At this point, there was only one sure way to feed my insatiable hunger for serials (as opposed to for cereals – mmm, cereals…) – turn the TV on during the DAY! Lynn was going to grad school at the time, and had a flexible enough schedule to take off a half hour around lunch to cozy on up alongside her cartooning hubby to tune into the daily trials and tribulations of ABC’s Ryan’s Hope.

I’m not sure how we settled on this particular series – it was never one of mom’s sketches – except that it was one of the few half hour soap being broadcast, and it had garnered a fair amount of praise for storylines tackling more contemporary issues than its video brethren. Revolving around an Irish family and their NYC bar, we soon discovered this essentially meant that something plot-worthy would happen to one or more of the regular characters one day, and then, for the next week or so, the OTHER characters would sit around the bar, discussing the possible implications of what had just happened! And then something ELSE would happen, and the cycle would be repeated! Given the genre, it wasn’t a bad show, really, just a whole lot slower than one might’ve liked. Which might well be why it was canceled back in 1989…

(Funny thing about the actors who appear on daytime soaps – you just never know how their careers are going to turn out. Shortly before he achieved sex symbol status on LA Law, Corbin Bernsen was saddled with the thankless role of being a third tier buddy on Ryan’s Hope. He played the police officer partner of one of the show’s ostensible heartthrobs (who always struck me as a big galoot, but hey, what do I know from beefcake?…), and his job was simply to sit in the patrol car and provide an ear for the star to unload about his romantic problems. Corbin’s character had absolutely no back-story, had no other interaction with the remainder of the cast, he was simply there to give the hunk a forum to emote. A year later, Bernsen was a prime time star, and the only other time I saw his one time uniformed buddy was in the opening minutes of an episode of Lois and Clark, as he ran cravenly into a dark alley, only to be gunned down by gangsters, after spouting maybe two lines of dialog! Showbiz sure is funny – you just never know…)

So anyway, we settled into our Ryan’s Hope habit, but the one thing I was determined not to do was to slip into watching a whole afternoon’s worth of soaps. Lynn wasn’t quite so adamant, though, and began to leave the tube on after RH closed up shop for the day, spurred on no doubt by the teaser scenes broadcast everyday during the serial’s final commercial break. That’s how she began watching All My Children…

fredhembeck 2006-09-28 02.jpg

Me? Well, I resisted, honest I did, but I saw the commercials too, and even though I got up and left the room immediately after my daily visit with the Ryan clan concluded, our place wasn’t all that big at the time, the drawing board wasn’t all that far away, so while I may not’ve seen things, I sure HEARD ’em! Oh , the things I heard! Was Brooke’s mother REALLY the evil crime-boss Cobra? (Yes – though we also found out it wasn’t REALLY her mother…) After awhile, just to make conversation, I’d casually ask Lynn, hey sweetie, so what exactly happened on All My Children today, hmmm? Initially, she dutifully filled me in, but eventually, she just tired of the daily recap sessions and point-blank declared, look buddy, if you’re so interested, why don’t you just watch the show yourself?

And so – God help me – I DID…

fredhembeck 2006-09-28 03.jpg

That was way back in 1981 – to give you some perspective, diva icon Erica Kane (Susan Lucci) had only been to the altar twice by then, though she was currently involved with a married man with the quintessential soap moniker of Brandon Kingsley – and I’ve been watching ever since! Twenty-five years, a full quarter century! Five days a week, fifty-two weeks a year, one hour a day (though that latter total is essentially shaved down to a more manageable forty minutes per episode thanks to the miracle of the VCR – a miracle that, beginning in the spring of 1983 meant the Hembeck household NEVER had to miss an episode again!!) (But just try watching a week or two’s worth in one or two sittings after you’ve returned from vacation – if things are at a hot point, plot wise, you’re in pretty decent shape. Otherwise, it’s the video equivalent of driving the New York Thruway from Buffalo to Long Island – wholly necessary to get from point A to point B, but barren and mind numbing nonetheless…) – that’s a LOT of All My Children!!

And those of you who never developed a similar habit probably have one question screaming in your mind right about now:

WHY?

Well, I’m not really sure. Truth is, for the first five – maybe even ten – years, AMC seemed like a really good show to me! Honest! The characters (and actors) were interesting and appealing, while the melodramatic situations seemed clever and well conceived. Whether or not this was the actual truth or just the fact that the genre’s many cliches were new to us, I can’t say for certain. However, over the last dozen years, with the numerous improbable resurrections of long “dead” characters, the myriad of heretofore unknown sons, daughters, and half-siblings popping up at an alarming rate – not to mention murder mysteries that drag on for weeks, with the prime suspect ALWAYS found innocent during his or her trial – things have gotten a tad bit wearisome. But still I watch.

WHY?

Habit. And it really is the television equivalent of comfort food. There’s something reassuring about seeing the same characters day in day out, some of whom have been with the show for decades. (Despite being there since day one – years before me even – I’ve never cared much for Lucci’s Kane character, finding her more annoying than entertaining. Long term-wise, David Canary’s (Bonanza‘s Candy) meglomaniacal billionaire, Adam Chandler (and his sweet, simple minded twin, Stuart, who’s been criminally under used in recent times), is reason enough to justify tuning in.

fredhembeck 2006-09-28 04.jpg

Never off center stage (save for the occasional fortnight vacation) since joining the cast in 1983, his memorable portrayal has justifiably earned him a half dozen Leading Man Daytime Emmy Awards. I always got a special kick out of it when circumstances called for him to play Stuart pretending Adam, or vice versa – or that one unforgettable time he played Adam playing Stuart playing Adam! Okay, reading that sentence may’ve well made your head hurt, but if you’d seen him pull it off, trust me, you would’ve been impressed too! Michael E. Knight’s Tad Martin is another old friend I’d sorely miss if I quit watching…).

fredhembeck 2006-09-28 05.jpg

Let’s make something clear here – for me, the soaps aren’t really about the romances. Oh, I like me a good love story as much as anyone, but you’re far more likely to find a truly emotionally affecting romance in a movie. There have been some sweet couples on AMC over the years (Tad and Dixie USED to fall into that category – but then she came back form the dead, and well, you can just imagine the rest…), but I think the real appeal of following a daily soap boils down to two things:

Secrets and confrontations.

Everyone on a soap – unless you’re Corbin Bernsen – has a secret at one time or another. And while that secret is sometimes known to the viewer right from the outset, while other times it’s only slowly revealed to the audience at home, it’s a certainty that the character who’s MOST effected by said secret (like the mother whose baby was switched at birth, let’s say – hey, it happens!!…), they’re always the LAST ones to find out, after virtually everyone else in Pine Valley knows the bitter truth! And that leads inexorably to part two of this equation – the confrontation!

WHAT exactly is the mother who fell victim to the baby switch going to say when she confronts the guilty infant snatcher – just coincidentally her erstwhile best friend, natch – when she finally learns the truth? THIS is the moment you’ve been primed, Pavlovian-like – to anticipate for months on end, and when it finally arrives, well, you really, really hope there’s no breaking news story to deny you the important stuff, dig? (I STILL don’t know why Julie Chandler left for the Far East years ago, thanks to Peter Jennings interrupting the festivities at just the wrong moment, and as the future Mrs. – and later ex – Jim Carrey’s exit was more low key than most, Lauren Holly’s 1989 departure was never, ever mentioned again! ANOTHER dangling plot thread taking up crucial space in my slowly atrophying noggin! Damn you, ABC News!)

Yeah, I know – this all sounds pretty lame. And it probably is – but as addictions go, save for a few eroding braincells, happily, one’s health isn’t compromised! Sometimes, it’s just fun – in a rueful sort of way for loyal viewers – to simply sit back and mock the absurdity of it all. And in a crazy way, it even makes you appreciate other TV more. Check this out – a lot of folks labeled the second season of “Desperate Housewives” as substandard, but to these eyes, it was Masterpiece Theater compared to the thirty-sixth season of All My Children! And I’ve heard plenty of wailing about the perceived illogic of my beloved “24”, but friends, next to the wildly careening plot turns taken by the denizens of Pine Valley, Pennsylvania, the antics of Jack Bauer and company make plenty of sense to me!

One of the outgrowths of watching AMC over the years has been the way it’s affected my OTHER TV viewing. First and foremost, it taught me never to watch any other soaps, as Id likely never be able to stop, but it’s also pointed me towards several prime time programs I might’ve otherwise passed on (and no, LA Law, which I’ve never watched, wasn’t one of them – I didn’t even realize who Bernsen was until I stumbled across his soap credit somewhere).

Sarah Michelle Gellar joined the cast in 1993 as Kendall Hart, the grown daughter Erica Kane didn’t know she had (quite a trick – and Ms.Kane even more recently discovered a son she didn’t know about as well! As to HOW that was possible, don’t ask…). When she left to do Buffy the Vampire Slayer, I tuned in simply out of pure curiosity. wondering how a soap vet was gonna turn a little regarded horror flick into a weekly TV series. I didn’t even figure I’d be coming back for the second episode, but once I saw the debut, I was almost immediately transformed into a life-long Joss Whedon fan, and I’ve followed everything he’s done since!

fredhembeck 2006-09-28 06.jpg

Another actress in that role and I’d’ve most likely passed entirely (it didn’t seem, on the surface, my sort of show), probably wondering these many years later, what the fuss was all about. Far less the critical darling, but still a lot of fun, Las Vegas wouldn’t’ve even have been a blip on my radar, despite Jimmy Caan starring, if it weren’t for AMC’s ex-Leo, Josh Duhamel , being featured right alongside the Godfather vet as Danny. And even though I always found Kelly Ripa’s Hayley Vaughn either too shrill or too self-pitying, I couldn’t resist checking in to see how she’d make out sitting alongside Regis back when they were having on-air auditions to replace Kathie Lee Gifford several years back. Much to my surprise, I found her engaging, witty, and genuinely amusing, all the things that had never came across in her AMC work, and when she finally settled into the co-host seat five years ago, I became a regular viewer of a show that had gotten along just fine without me entirely for decades! the last time i had watched Reege was when he hosted a short-lived seventies gossip based game show, The Neighbors – who knew he was such a character? (I also watched Ripa’s sitcom, Hope and Faith, which I considered a well performed but dumb comedy, not something I would’ve otherwise followed, and shed no tears over its cancellation after three seasons…).

So yeah, I watch a soap – and you might well say, if it weren’t for Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman, I never would’ve watched Firefly! And you might well be right…

Let me leave you with this curious little bit of cross-network trivia. As stated above, Sarah Michelle Gellar went directly from playing Erica Kane’s daughter, Kendall Hart, to playing Buffy. At the same time she was on AMC, future Buffy cast mate – who would play a heretofore unknown younger sister to the Slayer (actual magic was used to accomplish THIS oddball plot point, making it slightly more credible than typical AMC plotting…) thrust into the mix midway during the series run – Michelle Trachtenberg was also a cast member on the soap. She played Lily Montgomery, the autistic step-daughter of long-time (and perennial Kane paramour) cast member (and comic fan!) Walt Willey.

fredhembeck 2006-09-28 07.jpg

She was more of a plot device than a fleshed out character at the time, however, and Jackson Montgomery (Willey) was involved with her birth mother, and nowhere near the then current Erica-based storyline, so the Gellar and Trachtenberg characters never crossed paths during their time spent simultaneously in Pine Valley.

Then, a few years back, as is often the case, a new actress was brought in to assume the role of Kendall on AMC, and maybe a year later, another one to take on the task of bringing Lily from out of the halls of the special (but never seen) school she’d attended for nearly a decade off camera (her mom, y’see, had been killed awhile back). Jackson and Erica – who’d been on and off for nearly two decades, but who’d never actually tied the knot – FINALLY got married about a year ago, meaning that – just like Gellar and Trachtenberg on Buffy – the two characters originated by the aforementioned actresses, Kendall and Lily were now sisters too!

Ain’t that something? Aren’t you glad you read all this way for THAT? Hey, my head’s filled with useless information, no argument there, but I’d like to think that at least some of it is INTERESTING useless information!!

Well, gotta go. Lynn’s calling me – it’s time to watch today’s episode. I wonder when Adam’s gonna find out that his daughter Colby didn’t perish in that boat wreck (the one that served as a capper to her extravagant Sweet Sixteen Birthday party, shortly after she lost her virginity on board to Erica’s step-nephew!) and is instead hiding in the secret tunnels at the Chandler Mansion, listening in on everyone’s secrets? Hey, forget about how Marvel’s Civil War is gonna turn out – THIS is what I wanna see!..

May Rao help me…

Hembeck.com – c’mon over!

-Copyright 2006 Fred Hembeck

September 27, 2006

Brat-halla #147: Norse Force – Special Tutoring

Filed under: Brat-Halla,Comic Strips,Spook'd — UncaScroogeMcD @ 8:00 am

by Jeffery Stevenson and Seth Damoose with colors by Anthony Lee

Larger Comic Version | ARCHIVES | OLDER ARCHIVES

 

Brat-halla #147: Norse Force - Special Tutoring

 

For extras, visit the Brat-halla Web site!

Check out the preview to the Image comic Jeff writes…

E-MAIL WRITER | ABOUT JEFF | ABOUT SETH | BRAT-HALLA BLOG | BRAT-HALLA FORUM | ARCHIVES

Quick Stop Thingamabobs: 9/27/2006

Filed under: Columns,Thingamabobs — UncaScroogeMcD @ 5:48 am

 

thingamabobs.jpg

The web. It’s a big place, full of plenty of distractions ““ some funny, some informative, some ludicrous, some disturbing, some inane, some profound. Each and every weekday, we present links to a few of our favorite finds”¦

————————————————

  • If you’ve yet to experience Neil & Emmy Cicierega‘s “Potter Puppet Pals”, now’s the time to finally jump on the bandwagon with their latest adventure, as the formerly flash-animated vignettes make their transition to live action with “Potion Class.” (Thingamabob)
  • Mark Evanier gives some background and introduces a clip of The Pendragons doing their legendary version of the classic magic trick “Metamorphosis.” (Thingamabob)
  • Peep the tour dates for legendary raconteur, humorist, DAILY SHOW correspondent, humanitarian, and author of The Areas Of My Expertise, John Hodgman. Accompanied by cyber-troubadour Jonathan Coulton, like The Monkees before them, they could be coming to your town (Thingamabob)
  • Go take a look at some of the stunning art crafted with old world skill by The Venture Bros.‘ own Doc Hammer. (Thingamabob)
  • A turtle singing Robbie Williams’ cover of “Ain’t That a Kick In The Head.” A turtle named Tibby. (Thingamabob)
  • Herman’s Hermits and Phyllis Diller. ‘Nuff said. (Thingamabob)

Have a THINGAMABOB? Send it in!

 

« Newer Posts — Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress