FRED Entertainment

May 13, 2010

Soapbox: Who Defanged The Vampires?

Filed under: Articles — Tags: , , , , , — Aaron @ 9:02 am

soapbox-header.png

Who Defanged The Vampires?

lucyline.gif

I read a lot of books during the course of a year (2009 saw me work my way through over 30 of them) and not all of them are great. I do not pretend to be an academic when it comes to the analysis of novels – although I loved English at school, that was always the part of the class I dreaded. And I don’t think you SHOULD analyse books, they exist to create a different world, offer new perspectives and to invoke feeling and emotion within the reader.

But, having said that, my job is to do just that!! But be warned, anyone expecting high brow, intellectual breakdowns of the subtext of the latest Lionel Shriver offering should probably go elsewhere. My opinions are more of the “that bitch couldn’t write her way out of a paper bag”. And if anyone notices any traces of bitterness creeping in, that’s because there is. I am a would-be novelist trying to fit writing around a career and running my home.

Anyway, onto the subject at hand…

I remember when vampires were scary and the mere utterance of the word “Dracula” could have you checking over your shoulder to make sure someone wasn’t trying to drain you via your throat. Where readers made sure their windows were firmly closed before going to bed, lest a vampire in bat form flies in and catches you sleeping. Images of the immortal who could only be slain by a stake through the heart or decapitation used to plague my nightmares for weeks after reading.

In short, vampires were bad-ass. The amazing thing was that they didn’t have a conscience, so weren’t held back by the morals and social norms of the day – they were free to feast and raise hell without thought for consequences or those around them. The vampire lifestyle was truly a pursuit of hedonism. And a person with no limitations and a lust for human blood is truly a terrifying concept, especially when they have supernatural powers and incredible physicality.

And they were sexy. Partly because of the aforementioned bad-assery, but mainly because they were written that way. Vampires use their good looks, pale skin and often hypnotic eyes to attract unsuspecting victims to get close enough to take a bite out of. And the sexuality of vampires is tied into the lack of concern for societal conformity or moral code. Bisexuality, multiple partners and other sordid sex acts are alluded to or graphically detailed in vampire books. And it’s not just a modern concept, the sex of vampires goes back centuries.

In 1872, a book called “Carmilla” written by Sheridan Le Fanu depicted a woman targeted by a lesbian vampire who adopts a new persona and stays with the victim’s family, transforming at night and feasting on her while she sleeps. This book served as a prototype for future lesbian vampire offerings, although it wasn’t hugely overt in it’s sexualising of the situation.

vampire

But surely the quintessential vampire novel has to be Bram Stoker’s Dracula, which has served as inspiration for nearly every vampire novel that followed it, the good, the bad and the ugly.

Written by Irish author Bram Stoker at the end of the 1800s, Dracula is a book that has been broken down and reassessed for as long as it has existed. And for good reason. It is has the elements nearly everyone would associate with a vampire story.

It is sexy: Johnathan Harker is targeted in the night by three buxom and sexually available women, and the hypnotic charms of Dracula hint that there is a supernatural draw to these creatures.

It is scary: People being attacked in the night by unknown assailants, Dracula stalks his prey, watching them when they think they are alone. He is pretty much like a shadow.

It is balanced: Dracula is not an emotional being. It is not part of his make up. He is an animal, who doesn’t show feeling for his prey. No, the emotion of the story comes from the humans, who mourn, get angry and seek revenge. And that is how it should be.

But now we have a different breed of vampires, who brood, who don’t eat human flesh, who love human women and who seem to have had their fangs removed at the same time as their balls.

And do you know who I blame for this? Not Stephenie Meyer, who while she has made this situation worse by creating a book so sweet and puppy dog-ish that millions of teens were bound to fall under it’s spell, didn’t set the trend. Not Joss Whedon, who, while I adore him and everything he has done, created a good looking vampire sullied by a soul who did the “dark and broody” thing to death. Not the myriad writers who have tried the old formula of love between two people with different backgrounds (a post-mortem Romeo and Juliet, if you will).

Nope, to look for the culprit, I have to go back to the 1970s to Anne Rice. Yep, the one and only. The woman responsible for Interview with the Vampire and the rest of the Vampire Chronicles. She created characters who stop to think about what they are doing, the effects the actions have and bemoan the life they have. She tries and affixes her own morals to a tale that really shouldn’t have any (except for the whole if you are bad, bad things will happen to you which comes when good invariably triumphs over evil).

Lestat, while on the surface is a man who enjoys being undead and all that that entails, is actually lonely and often questions the right and wrong of his existence. He tries to defend himself to people who question his actions or motives.

And in Memnoch the Devil it gets downright ludicrous when Lestat helps ensure no bloodshed during a battle between rival factions.

Let me repeat that: A VAMPIRE MAKES SURE THERE ARE NO DEATHS IN A FIGHT.

This is unfathomable. Dracula would have ensured that all people on both sides were slain and he had enough time to drain them all before making his escape. That is the way it should be.

Stephenie Meyer doesn’t even give the readers anything that resembles a traditional vampire. In interviews, the author (and I do use that term loosely, because although the idea was reasonable, the execution was miserable) freely admits she did no research on vampires while writing. That’s how we end up with vampires who don’t have sex, don’t drink human blood and SPARKLE IN THE BLOODY SUNLIGHT!

Everyone knows that vamps dust, not sparkle, Stephenie.

And instead of at least giving him a thirst for sex, the writer decides to make him chaste and unwilling to have sex before marriage.

(I must interject here in the interests of full disclosure: I have read the Twilight saga a few times. I have the first two films on Blu Ray. This is not because of the vampire aspect, in as much as I want to sex Rob Pattinson and my inner teen is a fat chick who wishes she could get the hot guy. But these books almost use the vampire angle as an incidental, it is a love story more than anything else. For vamps, I have much better reading material.)

And alas, the commercial success of the Twilight saga, which has broken previous records for number of books sold on opening night, means that inevitably carbon copies will flood our bookshelves, just like what happened post-Da Vinci Code.

Anne Rice has a lot to answer for, and I don’t just mean for turning Lestat into a literary vessel for her to spout her own crap about life and being famous and such. She has led the way for a slew of watered down, under-nourished and wimpy vampires who I as a mere human wouldn’t be scared to take on.

What we need is a renaissance of the traditional vampire: The sexy, scary beast that turns into a bat, sneaks into your room, puts you under a hypnotic charm and sucks the life out of you. What we don’t need is any more limp wristed, human loving, guilt feeling pussies who would rather cuddle than bite a girl’s neck!

–Katy Gordon

Soapbox: Musings Of A Game Store Clerk

Filed under: Articles — Tags: , , , , — Aaron @ 6:46 am

soapbox-header.png

Musings Of A Game Store Clerk

lucyline.gif

I know it may seem harsh, but seeing a machine I waited in line for 9 hours to purchase collecting dust is just a little painful. It’s not like I haven’t tried to play it…but every time I look at my Wii (and yes, Wii jokes are still funny) I just end up angry. It’s not just me – nobody wants to play with the damn thing, and they haven’t for some time. Where have the family bowling tournaments gone? What happened to drunk Wii tennis? Why does the Wii suck so much?

Talking to other gamers, I’m finding that this is more and more the case with the Wii. So what’s the problem? What could Nintendo have done to make one if it’s biggest fans (me) reject it?

wii

Too much crap – The Wii’s game library, though extensive, is mostly crap even 7 year olds get bored with in a matter of minutes. There are a few gems, but they are few and far between. As always with Nintendo, if it has Mario or Zelda on the cover it is probably a safe bet. Personally, Resident Evil 4 was the game I found to be the most enjoyable on the Wii – and it is a Gamecube remake! In terms of gaming, I take offense that the word ‘casual’ is synonymous with ‘terrible game not worth your money’.

Lack of online features – Compared to the Xbox 360 and PS3, the Wii’s online features are very disappointing. Using long, numerical codes to add your friends is far more difficult than remembering a nickname as with the other systems. Recently, Shigeru Miyamoto has announced that they will very likely be adding ‘premium features’ to the Wii’s online marketplace… and also implementing a monthly cost for these services.

Too many peripherals – Despite the lower price of the Wii console, it has some of the more expensive peripherals out there. The console itself only comes with one Wii remote and nunchuk, which are sold separately. Then you’ve got the Wii motion Plus, the Wii fit, and a plethora of other accessories available that do absolutely nothing to enhance gameplay.

Console killing rumors – What exactly is casual about playing a console game when you can easily open an app for your iphone in 1/10th the time? By starting the casual gaming craze, every company from Apple to Facebook has added some gaming aspect to their products. I have no problem with this, but it does seem like Nintendo has shot themselves in the foot here to a certain degree. As ‘casual’ as Nintendo games are, they still (usually) require a degree of effort/concentration to enjoy. This new breed of casual games usually doesn’t.

I choose to blame Nintendo for creating this vernacular among gamers that makes us define ourselves as either casual or hardcore. As a female gamer, I am quickly defined as casual by most people who ask for my gaming advice. Should I be offended that they don’t assume I kick ass at Call of Duty?

When it comes down to it, I want to be engaged by the game I am playing. I don’t honestly believe that this casual gaming phenomenon signifies the end of console gaming, but a definite shift is coming. PS3 seems to be the most on track with the inclusion of various features that allow the system to be used for all forms of entertainment, not just gaming. In terms of casual vs hardcore games: who cares? As long as the gameplay is fun and engaging, why should it matter?

–Mary Hoffman

Contest Round-Up: 2010-05-13

Filed under: Articles — Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 3:31 am

contestheader.jpg

Welcome to our weekly round-up of featured giveaways here at FRED. Every week, we’ll present a new clutch of DVDs, books, and other cool stuff you can take a shot at winning. All you have to do is click on the graphics below to be taken to their respective contest pages. And good luck!

In conjunction with BBC Home Video, we’re giving away three (3) copies of SURVIVORS: THE COMPLETE SERIES (1975) on DVD.

In conjunction with BBC Home Video, we’re giving away three (3) copies of SURVIVORS: SEASON 1 on DVD.

In conjunction with BBC Home Video, we’re giving away three (3) copies of MERLIN: SEASON 1 on DVD.

In conjunction with Warner Bros. Home Video, we’re giving away three (3) copies of EDGE OF DARKNESS on Blu-Ray/DVD.

In conjunction with E1 Entertainment, we’re giving away five (5) copies of THE ABBOTT & COSTELLO SHOW on DVD.

Win THE ABBOTT & COSTELLO SHOW on DVD!

Filed under: Contests — Tags: , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 3:27 am

contestheader.jpg

In conjunction with E1 Entertainment, we’re giving away five (5) copies of THE ABBOTT & COSTELLO SHOW on DVD.

Contest ends at 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, May 26th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of FRED Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

One entry per day, per person.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, May 26th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

Win EDGE OF DARKNESS on Blu-Ray/DVD!

Filed under: Contests — Tags: , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 3:15 am

contestheader.jpg

In conjunction with Warner Bros. Home Video, we’re giving away three (3) copies of EDGE OF DARKNESS on Blu-Ray/DVD.

Contest ends at 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, May 26th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of FRED Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

One entry per day, per person.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, May 26th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

Win MERLIN: SEASON 1 on DVD!

Filed under: Contests — Tags: , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 1:20 am

contestheader.jpg

In conjunction with BBC Home Video, we’re giving away three (3) copies of MERLIN: SEASON 1 on DVD.

Contest ends at 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, May 26th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of FRED Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

One entry per day, per person.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, May 26th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

Win SURVIVORS: SEASON 1 on DVD!

Filed under: Contests — Tags: , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 1:10 am

contestheader.jpg

In conjunction with BBC Home Video, we’re giving away three (3) copies of SURVIVORS: SEASON 1 on DVD.

Contest ends at 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, May 26th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of FRED Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

One entry per day, per person.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, May 26th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

Win SURVIVORS: THE COMPLETE SERIES (1975) on DVD!

Filed under: Contests — Tags: , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 1:02 am

contestheader.jpg

In conjunction with BBC Home Video, we’re giving away three (3) copies of SURVIVORS: THE COMPLETE SERIES (1975) on DVD.

Contest ends at 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, May 26th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of FRED Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

One entry per day, per person.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, May 26th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

TV Or Not TV: I’d Rather Not Be ‘Across the Sea’ (LOST)

Filed under: TV Or Not TV — Tags: — admin @ 12:42 am

tvornottv-header.png

There are times when I’m watching a TV show that I really love that I sometimes sit in wonder and amazement at how compelling it can be. Other times I can be blown away by the use of imagery and symbolism that require me to think deeper about the message being delivered. Finally there are times that I am watching the show and have the feeling that I’m just completely missing the point because I don’t care for what I’m seeing at all. Sadly the 15th episode of the final season of LOST played out that last case scenario for me. As usual I will warn you that I am about to discuss the episode in detail so if you haven’t watched it yet and don’t want to know what happened than I suggest you return at a later date to read this.

I’m sure both on paper and in concept the idea behind the episode of ACROSS THE SEA sounded great and made the writers feel that they were really going to deliver on answering some questions for fans of the show while also tying up a few loose ends. We the fans would finally know who the skeletons of ADAM & EVE, discovered in the caves in the season one episode HOUSE OF THE RISING SUN, were. We would find out who built the DONKEY WHEEL that when turned moved the Island, and we’d find out the origin story of both JACOB and the SMOKE MONSTER/MAN IN BLACK. Unfortunately, for this viewer and fan anyway, what may have sounded good didn’t come off very good. I think that the Tweet from writer BRIAN LYNCH sums up my viewing experience best:

OK, maybe that doesn’t really sum it up but it made me laugh upon reading. I think fan reaction to the episode is also pretty clear from the Tweet sent out today by Executive Producer Damon Lindelof:

With ACROSS THE SEA what I ended up getting was a rather uninteresting story that lead to more questions than answers, which this late in the LOST game isn’t a good thing. I’m not just talking about a little list either. Here’s all of the questions that got stuck in my head while watching this episode:

  • Why did they have to clearly make a point out of the MAN IN BLACK not having a name by never saying his name, a move that just made me want to know his name even more?
  • Where did the MOTHER character played by ALLISON JANNEY come from and how did she become (I’m so sorry for this bad cliche) the protector of the light (yes, again, sorry, you read that right but hey I didn’t write the episode)?
  • Why throw us a bone by showing us it was the MAN IN BLACK who built the DONKEY WHEEL only to also show us that his job site was collapsed before being finished forcing me to wonder who did in fact finish it? Yes, I get that he probably convinced others that came to the Island to finish the job but still, why even give me that question?
  • Why have MOTHER say that she’s made it so that JACOB and MAN IN BLACK can’t harm one another and then have JACOB beat the crap out of him twice in the episode and then either nearly or completely fatally wound him as he’s tossed into the tunnel where the LIGHT is?
  • Why the heavy handed inter-cutting of the HOUSE OF THE RISING SUN footage of the skeletons being found in the future while JACOB places the bodies in the past? I know the producers said that this is one of the things that proves that they had the end game planned the entire time but instead it just came off as them finding a solution that fit the scenario they set up six years ago (not to mention JACK said the bodies looked like they could have been there for 30 or 40 years… that’s a bit off the mark from 100’s of years).

I suppose if you break it down to the essentials seeing this episode brought me the same level of frustration I experienced with the introduction of the MAN IN BLACK and the actual appearance of JACOB in the season five finale. Meeting these two characters made me feel like a lot of what we had watched up to this point and the struggles we had seen were diminished by these new players who apparently held a greater importance to the show than we had ever known. It felt like one of those bad mysteries where suddenly the bad guy is revealed and it is a character who was playing a bag handler in the background of the second scene.

Maybe I would feel better about this episode if they had come up with this idea earlier in the season, like immediately after the season premiere where we learned that SMOKE MONSTER and UN-LOCKE were one and the same. It certainly didn’t spoil anything for the rest of the season. I’d probably also feel better about this episode if it didn’t actually make me feel almost sympathetic again for the MAN IN BLACK right after the episode that let us know that he was completely, totally and unarguably the bad guy. In this story he came off more as a victim who doesn’t want to be trapped on an Island where for 13 years he was raised by the crazy woman who murdered his mother. Yes in the end he ends up stabbing his “Mother” but this can also be taken as avenging the death of his real mother and the people he has lived with for the past 30 years as well as freeing himself of the evil that this mother murdering monster clearly seemed to be capable of. Instead of black and white (a metaphor and bit of symbolism used WAY TOO MUCH in this episode) and the struggle of DARK and LIGHT we get dumped right back into shades of grey. From a story telling perspective this sudden shift made no sense.

Another frustrating element of this episode was taking JACOB from the wise and enlightened being we previously viewed him as and reduced him to a whiney little momma’s boy. He didn’t come by the job of protector of the light (ugh) and Island as a noble calling or through trials and redemption. He was handed a job at the family business that he didn’t want and just like so many others in the same role he screwed up on his very first day on the job. All he has to do is protect the light and keep men out of the cave. First command decision? Throw his brother into the tunnel and BAM he makes a smoke monster. Way to go JACOB!

Oh yeah, before I forget, I think we should officially ban any writer from ever using the term “There’s a storm coming” again. I’m calling for a moratorium on this one folks, it’s been overused and is such a heavy handed term used in foreshadowing that it pretty much insults my ears for hearing it. In this episode that was overflowing with symbolism it was pretty much the straw that broke the camel’s back.

Going in to this episode I really wanted to love it but instead it was just too long of a story that did very little to hold my attention long enough to show me who built the DONKEY WHEEL, how MAN IN BLACK became the SMOKE MONSTER and who two skeletons were in the caves. If this episode is any indication for the type of writing we can expect over the next three episodes than I can only tell you one thing folks: There’s a storm coming.

Cabin Fever 93: Oh Yeah!

Filed under: Cabin Fever — Tags: , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:20 am

cabinfeverheader.png

cabin.jpgOh no! Just when you thought it was safe to hang out at the FRED…

Cabin Fever (hosted by the twisted souls Brian Fitzpatrick and Aaron Poole) is the result of having too much time on your hands and access to your local community radio station.

Over the course of an hour, they manage to trawl the depths of good taste, plus throw some music in. How much more could you want from a podcast?… Quality? Oh… we didn’t think of that.

Enjoy! And we hope our cross Atlantic friends can understand the Irish accent 😉

Hugs and Kisses,
Aaron P. + Rev. Fitzy

linesm.gif

CABIN FEVER #93: Oh Yeah! – Aaron and Brian return to rock you like a hurricane, or at the very least a mild wind. A taste test is approached with caution, some movies discussed and a general catch-up on what the last couple of weeks have contained. It’s hard sometimes to write these. 93 episodes though, that’s amazing. I remember back in 2008 when…

[CONTENT WARNING]: Explicit contents! We say every naughty word you can think of. You have been warned!

DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
Episode #93 (MP3 format)

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/cabinfever/cabin_fever_93.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

Got something to say? E-mail Aaron & Brian at the Cabin Fever mailbag.

line.gif

CLICK HERE FOR THE CABIN FEVER ARCHIVES

line.gif

##

Bagged & Boarded 55: Dr. Crazy Asian Man and “The Lady-Boners”

Filed under: Bagged & Boarded — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:06 am

baggedboardedheader.jpg

What happens when two young men let their love of movies, comic books, and all things “geek” take over their lives? They run away from their families, bringing only the most essential DVDs and comics to their secret, highly fortified underground bunker in sunny Southern California, where they start recording podcasts that will change the world.

Are they heroes?

No.

Are they geniuses?

Far from it.

Are they the future of this planet?

I sure hope not.

Simply put… Matt Cohen and Jesse Rivers are “Bagged and Boarded”.

linesm.gif

BAGGED & BOARDED #55: Dr. Crazy Asian Man and “The Lady-Boners” – In which Matt and Jesse meet an incredibly racist new friend, discuss some exciting new developments for the future of the podcast, and attempt to invent a new nickname for female masturbation. Totally safe for work… if your boss is awesome.

[CONTENT WARNING]: This podcast may contain some foul language and horribly off-color jokes. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
Episode #55 (MP3 format)

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/baggedboarded/bagged_boarded-55.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

Got something to say? E-mail Matt & Jesse at the B & B mailbag.

line.gif

CLICK HERE FOR THE BAGGED & BOARDED ARCHIVES

line.gif

##

May 12, 2010

Soapbox: SUMMER HOURS

Filed under: Articles — Tags: , , , , , — Aaron @ 5:24 pm

soapbox-header.png

SUMMER HOURS

lucyline.gif

summer_hours_dvd_coverThe family that Olivier Assayas tracks with his latest film, Summer Hours, is such a well-to-do, bourgeois clan that, initially, one can scarcely imagine many people identifying with them, particularly in a global economy that has placed millions of previously middle-class citizens in a position lower than that of this family’s maidservant. And yet the film remains one of the most profoundly humanistic and relatable movies of recent years. It is a work of quiet grace, a gliding, meditative elegy that passes over generation gaps so gently and effortlessly that the poetry of its movement alone exposes the fragility of such a compartmentalizing concept.

The film opens upon, and symbolically concerns, a quaint manor in the south of France, one of the world’s most beautiful regions. The people there are, if at all possible, more stereotypically self-absorbed and haughty (and therefore “French”) than the Parisians, but it is exceedingly difficult to fault them for feeling superior in such a place. Many French productions exist only to show other countries, and remind its own citizens, of the South’s beauty, and part of Summer Hours’ charm is its sly adherence to this style for just the right amount of time to make us think that it’ll be yet another artistic tourist video before heading in another direction.

Instead, Assays focuses upon that wonderful brand of refined middle-class folk who populate the region, here typified by Hélène, a 75-year-old connoisseur who is as much a curator of her home as she is a resident. A fearsome matriarch, Hélène filters her considerable knowledge through the mannerisms and directness of a mother. She has that ability to calmly, even lovingly, point out flaws in her children’s professional and private lives, speaking without judgment as if her criticisms are facts and therefore not worth editorializing upon. Played by Edit Scob, 72 at the time of filming, Hélène scarcely looks 60 and would look even younger if not for her silvery hair; like her house, Hélène is immaculately preserved. (It has always puzzled me why so many Europeans went off to die in the Everglades looking for the secret to youth when it clearly existed somewhere in France already.)

So sharp is the matriarch that she knows her days are numbered. At the 75th birthday party that opens the film, one of her sons, Frédéric (Charles Berling) gives her a cordless telephone set, and the woman who immediately afterward receives a French translation of an art textbook to proofread suddenly looks confused and ignorant as she takes one look at the phone and its accessories and throws up her hands. Hélène takes Frédéric aside to discuss her will. Here the film ceases to be a paean to Southern France and becomes something far deeper. The son, the only of the three children to still live in France ““ Adrienne (Juliette Binoche) lives in America designing for a Japanese company, while Jérémie (Jérémie Renier) has relocated to China as an executive for shoe company Puma ““ wishes to hear none of this morbid talk, and he assures his mother that the various artworks and artifacts that line the manor shall pass down the line. But Hélène knows better, and she gives her son instructions on what to sell and how to divide the effects and the house.

summerhours

A few months later, Hélène dies, an event left entirely off-screen. There are no long shots of Hélène tending her garden and collapsing à la Vito Corleone, no jarring telephone rings in the middle of the night; Assayas merely cuts from a cold, literally blue shot of the old woman sitting in her vacant home and Frédéric discussing burial plots with a funeral director. It is at this moment that the film truly begins and, while the narrative itself continues to slowly and unremarkably progress, it also marks the moment where Summer Hours begins to rapidly set itself apart from its contemporaries. The elision over the typical cinematic details as seen in the jump between life and death starts a recurring subversion of nearly all the screenwriting tropes that come with what could condescendingly be called “this kind of movie”.

Watch the way the three children interact with each other when the time comes to discuss the inheritance. Frédéric assumes that his siblings will want to keep the house in the family, as he does, but Adrienne and Jérémie clearly do not agree. Yet neither openly states dissent, sheepishly mentioning how far away they live (Adrienne even says that she’s been living away so long that France itself holds little intrinsic value). They also do not say aloud that Hélène was the only reason the siblings ever got together anymore, and her funeral will likely be the trio’s last time together for years. Frédéric understands his siblings perfectly without them outright saying it. Later, when he and Jérémie discuss appraisals and tax deductions with an adviser, Jérémie lets slip that he’d spoken with his own realtor about selling the house for some time, which the more sentimental brother notes but does not use as the basis for some melodramatic attack. Assayas is above such shortcuts, preferring instead to show these people as actual people.

Indeed, were it not for the advanced camera movements, one might mistake Summer Hours for docufiction. So many of the film’s indelible “little moments” stand out because they feel as if we are being allowed to share them with these characters rather than advance trite character development. When Adrienne mentions her engagement, the brothers and their spouses slowly crack up with amusement, moving from the tittering, nervous inhalations of suppressed giggles to open laughter. We are not told what, exactly, went wrong with Adrienne’s previous engagement, which is right. As it is, the moment is warm and quietly revealing, telling the audience about Adrienne’s impulsiveness and the teasing and distant but loving dynamic between the siblings without wasting time with a story that has no sway on this narrative. By way of comparison, watch the scene early in Attack of the Clones in which Obi-Wan and Anakin make awkward, meaningless chat over a “nest of gundarks” that gives us no insight into its characters and instead clangs like a wrench bouncing off the wall of a canyon.

There must be some point to all of this, however, and the key to the film lies in the manor. Frédéric does not wish to part with his mother’s house because of the memories it contains; the extreme value of the artwork Hélène stored in her home means less to the son than the memories they connote. Thus, the pieces of art and architecture that pass from the family to private collectors and to museums for the tax write-off stand as blatant symbols, but symbols whose meaning speaks to the characters more than the analyst in the theater. It is, after all, silly to place such import on trinkets, but Assayas uses Summer Hours to examine how ordinary, even banal objects, gain importance, be it artistic or personal. Many of the house’s most valuable paintings are the work of one man, Hélène’s uncle. Hélène kept them because of her close, possibly very close relationship with him – this too is left largely unsaid and leads to a character insight rather than a mystery – and through her eyes we see these invaluable originals as naught but sentimental sketches given to a muse as a gift.

summer-hours

Adrienne and Jérémie have little time for such reflection, blithely taking stock of their mother’s effects so that they may sell them and return to life outside of France. These are not bad people, of course, but they have their own set of priorities. They are modern people, connected to the businesses that employ them instead of outdated ideas of settlement and lineage.

It’s a typically American point of view, given our own shallow past and the perception of the nation as a place to start all over and make a new life. In fact, the younger characters of Summer Hours subtly reflect a mindset that has become as much American as French. Adrienne lives in New York with her American fiancé, and the children of the brothers are – like all youngsters, we’re told – infatuated with American fads. Jérémie represents the speed with which people can adapt now to new environments, what with his flippant attitude toward moving halfway around the world for work. He mentions that his daughter will spend a term in San Francisco, the city where Asian immigrants traditionally landed; his daughter not only wants to see the America she’s fascinated with but she’ll arrive more as a Chinese visitor instead of a French one, vaguely reminiscent of the pure-French Arielle referred to as “La Chinoise” in Arnaud Desplechin’s Kings and Queen.

That these Americanized characters are chiefly unconcerned with the artifacts being auctioned and donated without a second thought should not, in my humble view, be seen as some sort of attack on the United States (although one could easily make that case, given the rabid anti-French sentiment egged on for nearly all of Bush’s years in office and Hollywood’s ever-strengthening chokehold on genuinely artistic cinema). Rather, Assayas considers how modernization shapes culture: in the age of the Internet, instant worldwide connection erases, at least partially, cultural divisions – is the censorship of Google or Twitter not the modern sign of a repressive regime? When a group of visiting American teenagers walks among the family’s donations in the Musée d’Orsay they look and act no different from the French teens, who would likely be just as bored by the tour. Thus, we have all become one people, which is great, but unification brings with it side-effects: if everyone adopts one civilization and one language, what will become of the art that is tied to a specific culture?

Summer Hours remains a quietly incisive film after multiple viewings precisely because it finds the intersection between these larger concerns and the more personal ruminations on changing generational attitudes toward tradition, even family. Adrienne and Jérémie have drifted away from home, and Hélène’s grandchildren appear even more separated from the passion of the older generation. As such, Summer Hours calls to mind the work of the Japanese legend Ozu Yasujiro, that great cartographer of the generation gap and family relations. Ozu has long been misinterpreted, by those who only watched Tokyo Story and decided to extrapolate an entire career from it, as a director who lamented the passing of the older generation and looked down upon the modernized youth. While Ozu certainly eyed the Western influence on culture and tradition with suspicion, even regret, his attitude toward characters was always nonjudgmental, just as Assayas’ is with these characters. He does not write off Sylvie, Frédéric’s teenage daughter, as just another dead-eyed, shiftless millennial, nor does he condemn the two ex-pat siblings for abandoning their heritage.

Instead, the director gently sculpts these characters, giving them such dimension that the story and themes come naturally from them. Adrienne, who hypocritically disapproves of Jérémie working for a company that exploits cheap labor while wearing a pair of Converse sneakers made the same way, would in any other film be the flighty, self-absorbed bitch denied her chance to prove any hint of humanity until a hackneyed breakthrough near the end. Here, however, she displays three-dimesionality from the start, setting aside her modern conventions to marvel over an old, silver platter, justifying her admiration of it to her mother by claiming that beauty is beauty, regardless of age. Later, as appraisers storm the house to attach price tags to everything, Adrienne discovers the platter and can barely contain her pure joy, and we see that even a whimsical nomad like her can assign meaning and memories to objects just as strongly as the more sedentary and traditional.

Perhaps the influence of such artistic keepsakes can be traced to the participation of the Musée d’Orsay, which not only loaned the art but funded the film as part of their recent focus on making films as a way of expanding the museum’s artistic boundaries. But the relation between objects and assigned importance has purportedly been a recurring theme in Assayas’ corpus, of which I must shamefully admit ignorance. The director certainly uses this partnership to its fullest potential, and the artwork he places in Hélène’s estate is as priceless as it is perfectly suited for the film. Apart from the use of Jean Berthier as the matriarch’s famous uncle, Assayas particularly highlights a few works by Jean-Baptiste-Camille Corot and Odilon Redon. Corot, one of the great landscapists, operated in the nebulous territory between the Neo-Classical movement and Impressionism. Classical art strove to depict subjects as they were, while Impressionism captures subjects as they strike the artist. Summer Hours, with its honest depiction of character and its analytical probing of inanimate objects until they take on a resonance, could be said to walk the line between the two as well. One should also remember that Impressionism grew, in part, out of the redundancy of realistic art in the face of the invention of the camera, a technological development that reshaped art as a response. Redon, on the other hand, was a Symbolist painter, though the designation suggests a more didactic approach than the artist really took. “My drawings inspire, and are not to be defined,” he once said. “They place us, as does music, in the ambiguous realm of the undetermined.” Summer Hours contains plenty of symbolic imagery to chew on, but Assayas’ structuring of the material places it in a more contemplative context than one that stresses its message over all else.

summerwi

But I fear that I’m losing control of this review now. Discussing Summer Hours can be a tricky proposition, as so much of its power and insight is directly tied to what’s on-screen. It is easy, for instance, to point out an arcing track-pan of a shot of a desk in the Musée d’Orsay after being moved from Hélène’s house and say that it symbolizes the ephemeral nature of the transformation of an object from something of deep personal significance to a sealed-off artifact to be disinterestedly ignored by schoolkids. In that one shot is the crux of the argument that modernization desensitizes and demystifies us all, that email and planned obsolescence of so many of our goods will rob everything of its spiritual value, that nothing will even last long enough to gain significance.

Far more difficult, however, is putting into words just why that shot can evoke a deep sadness and a sense of loss, even in this Mac-loving, nature-averse writer. Or why pointing out the scene’s symbolism is less fulfilling and thought-provoking than simply recalling a moment early in the film when Frédéric tours his kids through the house and recounts the history of the paintings and tries to sell the children on it just like the tour guide trying in vain to hook the teens in the museum. “It’s from another era,” the kids flatly tell their deflated father. This scene is echoed once more at the end, when Sylvie invites her friends to the gutted manor to give it a sort of farewell party, where the kids kick around footballs and blare music as if living out their fantasy vision of a museum field trip.

Yet it is this coda that cements Summer Hours as more than just the patient but cranky rambling of a ranting old man. As the teens smoke and drink and generally font les quatre cents coups, Sylvie and her boyfriend move to the outskirts of the garden, where the previously bored young woman quietly reflects upon her own memories in the house and wonders whether she will lose something she cannot get back when the house changes hands. “It’s my youth,” Hélène told Frédéric when she surprisingly surrendered her family’s hold upon the artwork stored in her house, and the meaning of that dismissal becomes clear only at the end. As he has delved into this topic before, the director by now understands that our own attachments to trinkets and keepsakes cannot be transferred to another. Hélène understands this too, so she releases her family from the burden of hanging on to objects that can never mean as much to them as they do to her, and in the process she frees them to build their own collections, whatever they may be. Thus, a relatively plot-less film ends with the director releasing his final major character, setting Sylvie off to make her own story, one that will make an interesting update of this one in a few decades.

When I first saw Summer Hours in a cozy arthouse in Columbus, Ga., I knew instantly that I’d seen one of the most charming, insightful and meditative films in recent years. Repeat viewings only enhance the feelings of regret, acceptance and hope as the familiarity these characters already exhibit with each other becomes ours as well. Open without being obvious, thematically occupied without losing its human element, elusive in a manner that makes everything inescapably clear, Summer Hours has a piercing vision but a soft touch. So very little actually happens, and yet every shot reveals something – an interaction, a reflection, a thematic advancement – and gives the feeling of immediacy despite its lax pace. At various stages in the development of this review, I pointed to one aspect of the film as being the most arresting, yet as I continued to write I would erase the last assertion to spotlight something else as the film’s true triumph. After watching it again, I think I know at last what truly makes the film so memorable: every time this film is set to make the usual cinematic choice, it doesn’t. What does it say about the state of cinema, then, that each of these diversions feels truer to life than anything playing at the megaplex?

Summer Hours is available now on DVD and Blu-Ray from the Criterion Collection. The Blu-Ray boasts excellent color levels (particularly the greens of the estate’s gardens) and a nuanced DTS-HD Master Audio soundtrack. Included in both versions are: an informative half-hour interview with Olivier Assayas, who describes how the project came to be and how his interests and those of the Musée d’Orsay aligned; a half-hour making-of documentary; and another, hour-long doc titled Inventory, which details the art loaned to Assayas for the film and the way it is used. Also included is a booklet featuring an essay by British critic and editor-at-large of Film Comment, Kent Jones, who pens for Assayas’ first entry in the Criterion Collection an introductory (and personal) overview of the director’s career in addition to his appraisal of this film. Praising Criterion’s Blu-Ray treatments is becoming an increasingly redundant gesture, but it’s fascinating to see how a simple, quiet film like this can be just as gorgeous as the company’s restoration of Days of Heaven and its flawless presentation of the digitally shot Che. The set comes almost as highly recommended as the film itself.

–Jake Cole

Interview: Charlie Craig

Filed under: Interviews — UncaScroogeMcD @ 4:58 pm

soapbox-header.png

craigThe real action on a television set doesn’t happen in front of the camera. Behind the scenes the show’s producers wear every possible hat – they pitch the pilot, write the scripts, hire actors, and oversee film editing. Over the years that job has become even more complex. As cable has broadened the creative possibilities and show topics are more niche, creators have had to expand their knowledge base.

Charlie Craig knows this better then anyone. He was a writer and supervising producer on The X-Files and, more recently, executive producer of Eureka, one of SyFy channel’s most highly rated shows. Today he spends his days writing pilots and pitches for new shows. Craig talked to Erin Biba about the balancing act of making a show from pitch to production.

lucyline.gif

ERIN BIBA: How many show ideas do you have to come up with before you get one on the air?

CRAIG: When I started doing this 25 years ago you came up with an idea and could go and pitch it to all the different studios and networks and one would like it. But now there are many more networks, which sounds good from a writer’s standpoint, but each one of those networks has an extremely particular set of criteria for what they want to put on the air. It’s narrowcasting.

I have a deal with Fox 21, which is a studio, to make pilots. Every idea is just good for one network and if they don’t like it I have to throw it out and come up with a new idea. It’s become much more difficult. You’d think with all these networks you’ve got it made.

When I started in 1985 Kate & Allie was the only half hour comedy in the top 20 and there were only basically three networks. When you came up with an idea your agent got excited and said: “Let’s go pitch to the three networks on Friday and one of them will outbid the other.”

Flash forward to today and there are more networks then I can count and even networks you don’t think are in the live action business are starting to get into it like Cartoon Network. To succeed and realize some level of potential each network has had to carve up the spectrum of public interest into a particular slice.

BIBA: So, realistically, you have to come up with a lot more then one idea.

CRAIG: Right. I have to say: who’s the idea for and does it appeal to enough people that I’m not limiting myself to a niche? It’s no longer good enough to just have an interesting idea for a television show. That is the starting place. Now it has to be: that’s interesting but what niches can it go into? My work has quadrupled. It’s not just about a good idea.

Now I have to come up with 8 new ideas every year and that’s a lot work.

You hope to find something that sparks you and run it by your agent and hope he doesn’t say: “They tried that a CBS and it didn’t work out. Everything on TV is already like that and ratings aren’t very good.” The hardest thing is not psyching yourself out. There’s a five-minute lag after coming up with something when your brain starts to generate ideas about why it’s not good

With the incredible number of networks there’s a greater sense of frenzy. There’s a bit of a frantic nature now — pitching a show is much more complex and much more hurried than it used to be.

BIBA: Do you worry that your show concepts aren’t as good because you’ve had to significantly increase the volume of what you’re putting out?

All good ideas become diluted because that’s the process of television. Honestly, some of the best work I’ve done has been when somebody threw an idea at me and said: “If you can do this in a week we’ll put it on the air.” There is no safety net, you can’t fail because everyone else already has, and in this amount of time who would expect me to succeed anyway? Whatever I come up with will be fresh and accessible. That frees your mind. Some of the best stuff I’ve done has come from that need for speed.

BIBA: But that speed isn’t relegated to the moments when you were asked to save something at the last minute. Isn’t working fast the key factor on any television set?

CRAIG: When I’m running a TV show it’s always about hustle. There’s no time to go back home and think about things. When you’re writing, running, and producing a show you have ten minutes to come up with the best possible solution and implement it. Pressure makes diamonds. I learned that in the ’80s on TV shows. If you’re good, when you’re forced to suck it up and do it, you get it accomplished.

BIBA: So what, exactly, is happening on the set that pulls you in so many directions?

CRAIG: In TV you’re sitting in an office coming up with idea. Meanwhile, people are shooting nine pages of your script. It’s all about the calendar. For example: They’re shooting episode two right now and we haven’t written episode four. It preps in two days. If we don’t have something ready it will cost $100,000. Then you have to cast the episode you’ve already written, go in to post and edit episodes which are about to start airing. All the while your sitting around creatively saying: “We’ve got ten more episodes we have to come up with.”

The downside of that is often you write a script a couple weeks before it shoots and then you get notes, things change, and tomorrow you’re shooting something you rewrote today, which doesn’t have the polish but time’s up. That’s a big reason why a lot of television is good but not great. You end up making decisions at the last minute that have lasting impact.

BIBA: Sounds exhausting.

CRAIG: It’s a real balancing act. That’s what everyday is like running a show. At least you come home at the ending of it saying: “Not sure what I accomplished, but we didn’t shut down, and no one fired me.” But if you’re good at it you enjoy it. There’s something about coming home and knowing I had to make 25 decisions and because 20 of them were good I’m good at what I do. The sheer volume causes you to feel like you have lived up to your title as a producer.

–Follow author Erin Biba on Twitter: @ErinBiba

Soapbox: The Art Of Break-Ups

Filed under: Articles — Tags: , , , , — Aaron @ 8:30 am

soapbox-header.png

The Art Of Break-Ups

lucyline.gif

How to get out of an unpleasant relationship with the help of The Art of War.

The situation: The beautiful and alluring girl you began dating several months ago has transformed into a clingy, manipulative, needy psycho bitch from Hell. There is a possible method of successfully escaping many more months (if not years) of detrimental psychological and emotional torment.

If you know that she will not surrender the relationship peaceably, if she will not agree to a break-up, and if any attempt to reason will result in more pain and soul-sucking misery, then your only option is sabotage.

“The Attack By Fire”. Sun Tzu said “There are five ways of attacking with fire. The first is to burn soldiers in their camp, the second is to burn stores, the third is to burn baggage trains, the fourth is to burn arsenals and magazines, and the fifth is to hurl dropping fire amongst the enemy.”

Do not take this literally. First, this is not an overnight attack. It will take time and strategy. “There is a proper season for making attacks with fire.” If your girlfriend has friends, then you must make sure that they are not present when you attack; although the attacks will be subtle, they will easily be detected by a horde of girlfriends.

Think of it this way: Your girlfriend is a general, and her friends are soldiers. You cannot have an equal fight until you are on equal ground, thus you must first dispose of her friends so that you will only have to battle her. What you have to do is draw their attention to their boyfriends. Refer to vile acts they did while you were last out with them, make vague references that will lead to explicit imaginations, such as “I love dogs, but I just can’t un-see the things that happened behind the windmill at the putt-putt. I honestly wish I didn’t know a girl could bend like that.” They will flee the camp, leaving you alone to deal with the shrew.

The next steps appear easy, however they require a light, subtle touch. You cannot appear too aggressive, this would cause her to react aggressively and douse your attacks.

“Burn the stores”. In order to effectively disarm her, you must first catch her off-guard. You do this by attacking her insecurity and security, in that order. The source of her insecurity is most likely her weight. Make sure your comments are not clearly intentionally insulting, make her believe that you think you’re complimenting her. Hold her waist and say “Are these new? I like it.” Mention that you think her baby fat is “cute”. Play with any flab you can find with a smile. Finally, offer her chocolate and ice cream and carbohydrates all the time, when she says she “shouldn’t” or “can’t” guffaw and ask who she’s trying to impress, and gleefully tell her that she looks fine the way she is. If she accepts, then if you were previously unable to find any flab, you have just planted the seeds.

“Burn the baggage trains.” Now that she is dazed, attack her source of security: her clothing and sense of style. As a guy, you have little-to-no sense of female style, but you can tell when she thinks she’s fashionable and stylish, and when she doesn’t. When she is expressing doubts about how a dress looks on her, agree with her; those pants do make her butt look big. Once again, you must do this positively, you cannot leave a doubt that you are even teasing her. You are attempting to convince her that not only is she as unattractive as she fears, but that you’re a clueless and incompetent boob who isn’t worth the energy of a fight over such matters. When she expresses pride over an outfit, agree once again, but then ask if it’s “supposed to look like that?” Point to somewhere specific, find some cloth that’s particularly loose or tight, and then tell her to forget it, that it’s barely noticeable. It’s not necessary (as it isn’t always applicable), but if she wears loose-fitting sweats for working out, or to go to bed, then tell her how “good those look” on her. Depending on how big they are, this may come off as a joke no matter how well you execute the tone and connotation, but don’t worry, if it flops then it won’t hurt your position. Also, it’s a clear sign that you’re ready for disarmament if she begins wearing them more often than usual.

If done properly, she will now be off-guard and is ready to be disarmed in preparation for battle. Her ammunition are your flaws. Obviously you can’t fix all of them, but you can fix an even mix of the big and little ones (the little ones are very important as those are the most difficult attacks to counter in an argument), as well as take steps to fixing or improving others. You cannot make these changes too obvious or else she may become suspicious (that you’re cheating on her, not that you want to break up), so be very careful. Some common flaws to work on: leaving the toilet seat up, not listening, having a lousy job, having no job, strong ties to mother, not watching what she wants to watch, drinking/spending time with friends too much. I reiterate, do your best to not make your efforts obvious, at least try not to let the changes affect your general demeanor. While changing some habits may put a pep in your step, you must resist the temptation to pep.

Once that is complete, you are ready to initiate a fight. Pick the right moment, a calm night far removed from any fights and wait for her to make a move, to do one thing that you can complain about that will set you off on a tirade of annoyances. Attack her insecurities without subtlety, her weight, her clothes, her friends, her recent penchant for sitting on the couch all day eating ice cream in her filthy sweats. If your attacks are successful, she will burst into tears, or possibly make a feeble attempt to retaliate at which point you can reveal your improvements, thus deflating her completely.

Most importantly, resist any temptation to have post-fight coitus. This will not only nullify all of your attacks, but it is a sign of great weakness that she will exploit and use to destroy you. After the fight is over, or even in its final coughing fits, make her leave immediately (or if you’re at her “camp”, you leave immediately), insisting that she or you return for retrieving whatever has been left there.

If this method fails, then you have no choice but to marry the succubus because any second attempt, no matter how cunning, will most likely result in bodily (specifically the groin) harm, if not death.

–Daniel Kiehnhoff

Essential Sounds (2010/05/12)

Filed under: Columns,Reviews — Tags: , , , , , , — Aaron @ 6:41 am

soapbox-header.png

Essential Sounds (2010/05/12)

lucyline.gif

Kanichiwa interwebbers it is I, your friendly neighbourhood music guru, and as ever from my headquarters here in Blighty I have been scouring the land for the best new music to keep your ears and soul at peace. This weeks essential sounds sees us travel through a sonic chamber of eclectic material bringing you a buffet of hip-hop, electro, punk and everything else bar the kitchen sink so grab a pair of headphones, plug in and take off.

1. “We Are Water” by Health

Californian noise rock troop Health return with a taste of new material in the form of “We Are Water”. Despite having only been in action since 2007 the LA based group have made somewhat of a name for themselves and with their latest single they are making all the right moves to further develop their reputation. On first reflection the potent mix of pounding drums and distorted ambience come across as a cocktail of sound which consists of equal measures fear and intoxication. This is the tracks strength and fortunatly for the listener it never dies down, gripping you by the ear drum and the jugular until the ride is over. This is an essential track because basically it is the equivalent of adrenaline pumping through your blood stream, it gets under your skin and becomes a part of you.

health1

2. “Shutterbug” by Big Boi

The often underated and overlooked other half of ATL’s iconic Hip hop duo Outkast, Big Boi further pursues his solo career with this hard hitting certified club banger! If “Shutterbug” is to be seen as a sample for what we can expect from Big Boi’s debut album Sir Luscious Left Foot then the early signs are good, very good. The expected soul and funk influence we’ve come to establish Big Boi with is ever present but under the production guidance of Scott Storch there is much more commercial appeal in the form of its big beat rhythm and squelchy synth work. All of this is topped off with Big Boi’s quick delivered and always on point flow, some may see this as move towards selling out but really its a long overdue move out of the shadows.

big_boi

3. “Rambling Man” by Laura Marling

On her 2008 track “New Romantic” English singer songwriter Laura Marling makes a reference to fellow musician Ryan Adams and in particular his music. In her latest single “Rambling Man” his influence on her work has never been more noticeable. The tender and beautiful nature of the song distinctly echoes the tone of Adams debut album Heartbreaker. At the young age of 20 years old Marling writes with the whimsy and experience of someone ten years her elder. The beauty behind the track is its simplicity, the stripped down structure of guitar, drums and the ever fashionable banjo mixed with haunting harmonies and the sweet sticking beauty of Miss Marling’s voice make for an excellent example of delicate yet unforgettable song crafting.

laura_marling

4. “Born Free” by M.I.A

It’s been three long years since Mathangi Arulpragasm, better known as M.I.A last had an album of new material for the world to revel in and despite a little tease of new music earlier this year she has been rather quiet. Until now that is, “Born” Free is the first official single from the forthcoming as of yet untitled Lp and believe me it dosent dissapoint. Kick starting with thrasing crescendo of drums it’s not long before the infectious bass line sinks it’s claws in and the track takes off like a rocket. Swelling with plenty of punk rock attitude and dancefloor swagger “Born Free” would be just as well suited to a riot as it would an underground club. Of course not one to shy away from thought provoking lyrical content its clear to see that after six years in the buisness she still has just as much if not more to get off her chest. Take all this and throw in some grimey distorted vocals and a rebel rousing one line chorus and you have all the right ingredients for a truly essential song.

mia

5. “Celestica” by Crystal Castles

I’m going to go out on a limb here and say that you will be hard pressed to find a more euphoric experience than this new exhibit from one of Canada’s finest exports Crystal Castles. Packed with a pulsating rhythm, swelling keyboard lines and a sun shower of synthesised delight its easy to see why I love this song so much. Alongside the shades of classic house music it seems as if the electronic duo have turned their ear to contemporary trends as well. A good example of this can be found in the lowered pitch of the vocal harmonies which are somewhat representative of UK Dubstep artist Burial. However the real gloss which makes the track shine bright is the pop like vocals of band member Alice Glass. To accompany the versatile instrumentation, Glass gives us one of the sweetest melodies you’re likely to hear in this genre.

crystal_castles

–Malcolm Foster

Soapbox: A Day Behind

Filed under: Articles — Tags: , , , , , — Aaron @ 5:13 am

soapbox-header.png

A Day Behind

lucyline.gif

It’s with no small amount of eagerness and curiosity that I await the finale of Lost which is airing in America on the 23rd of May this year. For the past five and a half years, I’ve followed the events that have been happening on and off the island. And in a little over a month from now, the show will end, but I suspect that speculation about some of the inevitable unsolved mysteries will continue long after the credits roll on the final episode.

But as much as I’m looking forward to seeing the finale of Lost, what I’m dreading is the in-between time. It’s that span of time that stretches from when Lost airs in America until the evening of the following day when I’ve done a full day’s work, am able to stream the episode on-line and play catch up with America, hoping the whole time not to accidentally see something posted on line by a friend where they give information about what happened. You can be guaranteed that at least one person will post very publicly something to the effect of “Oh Jack, why did you die?”

This situation isn’t just specific to Lost, though the impending finale has brought that programme to the forefront. It’s a situation that I find myself in with all of my favourite American shows and it happens with comic books too but to a much lesser extent. The day that Ted Mosby announces who The Mother is, I’m going fully internet dark until I can stream the episode.

To be a nerd in Ireland, or indeed anywhere that’s not America, is to live a day behind.

Growing up in Ireland as a nerd was a strange thing. BBC showed re runs of Star Trek and SKY1 showed The Next Generation as well as Quantum Leap if you were really lucky. Thinking back, the shows were probably months or maybe even a year behind the original American airdate, though with no frame of reference at the time it was never a cause for concern. But no one else watched these shows or cared in the slightest that they were on. Eventually I became convinced that the shows were scheduled just for me in a weird kind of nerd solipsism. But then, something big and amazing come along in the form of the world’s biggest double edged sword… the internet.

The internet is an amazing social tool and has allowed the world to connect in ways that were never thought possible before and it showed me very quickly that there were far more people like me out there than I realised. But at times, the best thing about the internet can be the worst thing about the internet because the internet contains all the knowledge in the world.

Knowledge and wisdom are two very different things.

The internet gave everyone a voice and as time goes on, the outlets for that voice become more numerous and easier to access. People love to talk about what they like or in some cases about what they hate. And people really love to talk about what they love or hate almost immediately after they’ve seen it or read it.

But it is the internet that allows us to be only one day behind America and gives us a chance to see our favourite shows before they air on TV on this side of the Atlantic.

The good news is that not all forms of media are subject to delays that are imposed by the world of television. Traditionally, movies come out in America long before they see the light of day in the rest of the world but that too is changing. In recent memory, movies like Taken, Dr Parnassus, Kick-Ass and the recently released Iron Man 2 have seen release dates in Ireland and the UK ahead of America.

The comic book world has always treated us with more dignity though, and we only have to wait one solitary day to “properly” catch up on our American cousins without having to cheat by reading online. New Comic Book Day in America is Wednesday and in Ireland it’s Thursday. This is a fact that most comic professionals in America aren’t actually aware of, but when they do find out it pleases them that their work gets to its audience the entire world over that quickly.

There is still some discrepancy in terms of the prices being charged for the books owing to freight costs and foreign exchange fluctuations. This discrepancy can be overcome though by shopping online, where prices are much more reasonable but the cheaper price comes with an extended timeline. It’s a trade-off that a lot of monthly collectors aren’t willing to make possibly due to the fact that they are afraid of having their enjoyment spoiled by friends in distant lands who have already read the comics, or possibly because it’s not pleasant to have to wait to have a cliff hanger resolved.

Marketers will classify this situation as “cash rich, time poor”, saying that we have the money to spend and don’t have the time to wait. But most of us will readily admit that it’s just down to plain old obsession. Though every once in a while the matter will be taken out of our hands and we’ll be forced to wait longer than normal due to Bank Holiday or an inconvenient ash cloud.

Being a day behind isn’t the worst thing in the world, and like anything else it has it’s good points and it’s bad points. There’s no pressure to have to live to a network-imposed timeline and the fact that you’re going to be behind to a certain degree no matter what you do does give you the freedom to live life on your own schedule. The internet sure ain’t going anywhere and though it can be dangerous during the in-between time, the benefits and the connection to the wider world outweigh any potential drawbacks.

–Simon Fitzgerald

May 11, 2010

FREDagator: 2010-05-11

Filed under: Articles — UncaScroogeMcD @ 4:04 am

fredagator.png

lucyline.gif

Fans of Minder & Star Wars – Melt your mind with this…

[ad#contestbox]

May 10, 2010

TV Or Not TV: 5/10 – 5/16

Filed under: TV Or Not TV — Tags: , , , — admin @ 5:32 pm

tvornottv-header.png

After recently spending some quiet ‘me’ time I was finally able to catch up on ABC’s floundering FLASHFORWARD. Since the show came back from its long winter break I’d only watched two episodes so I felt as though I hadn’t really given it all that much of a chance.

When FLASHFORWARD premiered I really enjoyed the first few episodes and I thought the show had a lot of promise. The gimmick was good and in many ways the show really seemed like the heir apparent to the LOST throne. Some how though the show really lost its steam prior to taking the winter break. I’m not sure if that was from having us involved in too many stories, taking us in to many directions, or just a lack of cohesive thought in the writing process. Whatever it was I wasn’t the only one to pick up on these things because the show had a pretty big shake up in it’s creative team during the break.

After coming back from the winter break the show seemed determined to really get down to business. They instantly established the fact that another world wide blackout may be coming (OH NO!) and the show gave us something we were missing prior to the break: real bad guys that the characters would eventually have to deal with. In taking a page from X-FILES and LOST they’ve kept the bad guys mysterious, made them seem real organized, and kept us virtually in the dark as to who they are and why they are doing what they are doing. It’s something that the show was really missing and it’s a welcome addition. The recent addition of James Callis to the cast as a secret flash forward experiment victim who has all kinds of possible futures locked up in his head is probably the one story line I want to see them follow because his performance is so opposite that of BALTAR from the re-imagined BATTLESTAR GALACTICA that it’s just brilliant.

There are still some things that just don’t seem to work right and a few missed opportunities, if you were to ask me. The story of the kidnapped daughter in the middle east is one that I just don’t have a lot of interest in. The doctor with cancer who is waiting to find his Asian lady love? Yawn. Taking the hope that the futures we saw aren’t set in stone and making us question if it can really be possible? Predictable.  Having an episode air on April 29th and not have it co-incide with the show’s timeline of the day of the flash, also April 29th? Meta fail.

All-in-all, however, I can really say with a degree of confidence that the show is actually worth the time to watch, especially in this latter half of the season. There is real momentum week to week and it really gives you a reason to watch instead of just making you watch to avoid missing some small detail that may be relevant later.

SNL

This past Saturday I think that SNL might actually be able to learn something from the Internet since the show featuring BETTY WHITE was probably the best episode of the entire 2009-2010 season. For the majority of this season watching SNL has been bitter-sweet as I’ve been looking for the ‘good sketch’ needle in a haystack of unfunny. I suppose even saying that it has just been this season is a bit of a stretch as well since the majority of last season was the same for me. Still, week after week, I DVR the show with the hopes that I push enough straw of funny out of the way to find that gleaming and sharp needle of funny that everyone is going to be talking about. All of that changed with BETTY WHITE.

First and foremost BETTY WHITE has (literally) had a lifetime of experience to finely tune her comedic timing to the point where I believe it is second nature. Her finely tuned comedic timing coupled with her mature and maternal grandmother facade make her a one two punch that I think just about any writer would be hard pressed to NOT make her funny. With this show there were close calls, two awkward ones in my opinion, where the premise was pushing it or BETTY seemed slightly out of sorts but even in those instances you were more forgiving because BETTY WHITE’s presence is so powerful you just didn’t care.

Another reason why I think that this episode of SNL was so good had to do with almost every major female cast member from the last 10 years returning for this special installment. I’m sure that this returning group has a certain affect in the writing room of the show that helped contribute to what, perceived by me, was a higher caliber of show quality. I also strongly suspect that this installment of the show had the benefit of lots of preparation in the way of writing being done well in advance instead of the usual writings as they go that I believe happens during regular production of the show. I only hope that there was something to be learned from the entire BETTY WHITE experiment and the forthcoming season finale with ALEC BALDWIN sends this season off in a good way.

Now let’s see what TV holds for us this week.

MONDAY

NBC – 8:00 PM: CHRISTOPHER LLOYD drops in as a therapist to help CHUCK deal with his head. Hopefully he’s more Doc Brown than Jim Ignatowski (oh heck, I’d take a nice merge of both).

CBS – 8:00 PM: The gang on HOW I MET YOUR MOTHER crash a swank New York party. I sense some stunt casting in this one.

ABC – 10:00 PM: CASTLE has to struggle for attention from BECKETT now that DEMMING is hanging around. Speaking of which has ABC got option contracts on most of the BATTLESTAR GALACTICA cast?

TUESDAY

FOX – 8:00 PM: OK AMERICAN IDOL this whole mentoring thing has got to stop. JAMIE FOXX mentoring the remaining contestants on singing songs from movies? Really? Now you’re stretching it. Why not RUSSELL CROWE, BILLY BOB THORTON or KEANU REAVES? They’ve all got bands, they just didn’t play a singer in a movie. Oh, wait, you want someone else who did the whole singer biopic thing? Bring in JOAQUIN PHOENIX instead or maybe DENNIS QUAID?

ABC – 9:00 PM: Tonight we see the touching story of When JACOB met SMOKEY on a very special episode of LOST.

FOX – 9:00 PM: OK, let me get this straight: KURT tries to butch it up, PUCK shaves the mohawk and RACHEL can’t sing on tonight’s episode of GLEE? Wow, this doesn’t scream filler at all!

WEDNESDAY

TheCW – 8:00 PM: OMG! It’s the two hour finale of AMERICA’S NEXT TOP MODEL and I’ve not watched a single episode! Why start now, right?

BC – 9:00 PM: OK, this week the MODERN FAMILY actually gets to Hawaii instead of just travelling there and just like last week I’m rooting for PHIL to find the cursed tiki idol to make my world complete.

NBC – 9:00 PM: MERCY has it’s season finale tonight and it’s ranked in my viewing schedule just behind AMERICA’S NEXT TOP MODEL. Oh well.

THURSDAY

CBS – 8:00 PM: The penultimate (kind of) episode of SURVIVOR: HEROES VS. VILLAINS airs and we I’m wondering if RUSSELL makes it to the end or did PARVARTI eat him alive?

TheCW – 8:00 PM: It’s spooky night done right on TheCW with the season finale of THE VAMPIRE DIARIES followed by the looming apocalypse on SUPERNATURAL.

NBC – 9:00 PM: Tonight is all filler on THE OFFICE until next week’s return of KATHY BATES.

FOX – 9:00 PM: Wow, I could use penultimate twice tonight because the the first part of the FRINGE season finale is tonight as well. It’s a two parter so next week won’t make much sense without tonight but it’s still the next to last episode to air for the season so I’m saying it’s the penultimate. I sure hope I’m using that word right.

FRIDAY

TheCW – 8:00 PM: Well we’ve waited all season to find out just how CLARK is going to deal with the Kandorians on SMALLVILLE and it’s finally here. The solution he sought and found last week results in all Kyrptonians being banished from Earth so I’m dreading a finale where it seems that CLARK is gone (again).

CBS – 9:00 PM: I only bring up tonight’s episode of MEDIUM because I once again wanted to say penultimate. So yeah, this is the penultimate episode for what could be the final season of the series.

SATURDAY

BBCAMERICA – 8:00 PM: OK, so maybe your TARDIS was a bit wibbly-wobbly and you missed last week’s first part of this awesome two-parter of DOCTOR WHO. Guess what? Tune in at this time and you can catch THE TIME OF ANGELS before the 9:00 PM airing of the second part FLESH AND STONE. Two hours I have no fear in recommending.

NBC – 11:30 PM: How do you follow-up the stellar BETTY WHITE performance on SNL? Two words folks: ALEC ‘MOTHER TRUCKIN’ BALDWIN.

SUNDAY

CBS – 8:00 PM: Grab a bowl of popcorn and sit down as CBS tries to dominate the night with the season finale of SURVIVOR: HEROES VS. VILLAINS. After the two hour finale you can even stick around for the reunion special right after.

FOX – 8:00 PM: The FOX network refuses to bow before SURVIVOR by rolling out another appearance of SIDESHOW BOB on tonight’s episode of THE SIMPSONS.

ABC – 9:00 PM: The explosive season finale of DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES hits as we see LYNETTE finally learns the down side of befriending a serial killer and the entire BOLEN business is finally put to rest.

HBO – 9:00 PM: It’s the final episode of the amazing World War II miniseries THE PACIFIC tonight. I hope no one spoils how it ends for me!

ABC – 10:00 PM: You hear that folks? It’s my sigh of relief at the fact that another season of BROTHERS & SISTERS comes to a close and I know there’s one less show on the DVR that I won’t be watching.

May 7, 2010

Weekend Shopping Guide 5/7/10: Big Blue Bridges

weekendshopping.png

The weekend’s here. You’ve just been paid, and it’s burning a hole in your pocket. What’s a pop culture geek to do? In hopes of steering you in the right direction to blow some of that hard-earned cash, it’s time for the FRED Weekend Shopping Guide – your spotlight on the things you didn’t even know you wanted…

(Please support FRED by using the links below to make any impulse purchases – it helps to keep us going…)

The epic films of David Lean are an essential part of any cinematic library, and the first to make the transition to high definition is the sweeping Doctor Zhivago (Warner Bros., Rated PG-13, Blu-Ray-$35.99 SRP), and it looks and sounds absolutely incredible. Just to add icing to the cake, it’s packed with bonus materials, including an audio commentary, a new retrospective, a making-of documentary, vintage featurettes and interviews, the theatrical trailer, and a sampler CD of Maurice Jarre’s score.

thinkgeek-01.jpg

Robots are cool. So is brushing your teeth. Go with me on this… When you combine a toothbrush and a tiny little motor, you get the uber-cool BristleBot Toothbrush Robot ($7.99), which you can race against each other (after personalizing it, of course). It’s small, it’s cheap, and it’s fn. Ace.

thinkgeek-02.jpg

I’m always leery of a new take on Hamlet (BBC, Not Rated, Blu-Ray-$24.99 SRP), but when it was revealed that the young Dane would be played by David Tennant and Claudius would be played by Patrick Stewart, well, I knew I’d have to give it a spin. And it is worth a viewing. Bonus materials include an audio commentary and a making-of featurette.

blankguide.gif

It’s been a few months and the new series has been hitting our shores, so hat means it’s time for another clutch of classic [Doctor Who] DVD releases. This time, we get a pair of Jon Pertwee adventures – The Monster Of Peladon (BBC, Not Rated, DVD-$34.98 SRP) and The Curse Of Peladon (BBC, Not Rated, DVD-$24.98 SRP). The 3rd release is a Tom Baker outing, The Masque Of Mandragora (BBC, Not Rated, DVD-$24.98 SRP), and all 3 are packed with bonus materials including audio commentaries, interviews, featurettes, and much more.

blankguide.gif

Using the Poppinsonian maxim of a spoonful of sugar, Paramount has dipped into their catalogue for a trio of new-to-Blu-Ray releases, the first of which is the aforementioned sugar – Saving Private Ryan (Paramount, Rated R, Blu-Ray-$39.99 SRP). [Ryan] looks & sounds better than any previous DVD release, and the 2-disc special edition contain an introduction from Spielberg, making-of featurettes, historical featurettes, and a documentary on WWII combat photographers. The medicine is a pair of less than stellar flicks – Harrison Ford in K-19: The Widowmaker and Kurt Russell in Escape From LA (Paramount, Rated PG-13/R, Blu-Ray-$29.99 SRP each). [Escape] is featureless, but [K-19] carries over an audio commentary, a making-of, and a trio of featurettes.

blankguide.gif

Presented by Sir John Gielgud, Six Centuries Of Verse (Acorn, Not Rated, DVD-$69.99 SRP) is an epic exploration of English-language poetry through the centuries, featuring performances by the likes of Anthony Hopkins and Julian Glover.

blankguide.gif

While the new Blu-Ray edition of Tombstone (Hollywood Pictures, Rated R, Blu-Ray-$29.99 SRP) retains the making-of featurette, trailers, storyboards, and TV spots of the most recent DVD special edition, the high-def debut of Armageddon (Touchstone, Rated PG-13, Blu-Ray-$29.99 SRP) is barren compared to the bonus-heavy Criterion edition of yore, giving us only a music video and trailers. Such a shame.

blankguide.gif

The comedy isn’t terribly nuanced, but there is a sucker punch level of laughs to be had from Leigh Francis’s grotesque creations in The Complete Bo’ Selecta! (Channel 4, Not Rated, Region 2, DVD-£29.99 SRP). The box set contains all 3 series plus the holiday special, filled with the likes of Keith Lemon, Avid Merrion, The Bear, Craig David, and more. Also available is the tribute special Cha’mone Mo’ Fo’ Selecta: A Tribute To Michael Jackson (Channel 4, Not Rated, Region 2, DVD-£12.99 SRP).

blankguide.gif

Universal dips into the vaults for the latest in the Backlot Series, The Barbara Stanwyck Collection (Universal, Not Rated, DVD-$49.98 SRP). The 6 films included are [Internes Can’t Take Money], [The Great Man’s Lady], [The Bride Wore Boots], [The Lady Gambles], [All I Desire], and [There’s Always Tomorrow].

blankguide.gif

You remember [The Santa Clause]? Where Tim Allen assumes the mantle of Santa Claus and family-friendly, heart-warming hilarity ensued? Well, replace Allen with Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson and make the former wrestler the titular mythical creature of Tooth Fairy (Fox, Rated PG, Blu-Ray-$39.99 SRP). Yeah. You heard me. The 3-disc set contains an audio commentary, behind-the-scenes featurettes, deleted scenes, a gag reel, and a standard DVD copy of the film.

blankguide.gif

Their marriage may not have been the happiest, but there’s no doubt that both Carole King and James Taylor knew how to write a song, which is evident on their recent reunion concert disc Live At The Troubadour (Hear Music, $19.98 SRP). And, because you know you want it, there’s also a bonus DVD of the concert, for those who want to see all of the water under this ex-couple’s bridge.

blankguide.gif

The films are good, but Universal’s new Blu-Ray/DVD flipper discs are still an unwelcome abominations – which is a shame, since the trio of catalogue titles – Out Of Africa, Traffic, & The Jackal (Universal, Rated PG/R/R, Blu-Ray-$26.98 SRP each) – deserve better treatment than this. Each film ports over the bonus films featured in the previous standard DVD editions (but [Traffic] is lacking the extensive materials found on the old Criterion release).

blankguide.gif

Recently re-released as a Blu-Ray special edition, the Colin Firth version of Pride & Prejudice (A&E, Not Rated, DVD-$19.95 SRP) makes its standard DVD debut in a 2-disc edition featuring the same bonus featurettes found on the high-def version.

blankguide.gif

David Lynch’s adaptation of Dune (Universal, Rated PG-13, Blu-Ray-$26.98 SRP) is one of those glorious, overblown, disastrous fantasy flicks that seemed to come fast and furious in the 1980’s. The new high-def transfer is certainly impressive, and while the film is tedious at best and certainly off-putting, the new edition should make fans happy, as it ports over the deleted scenes and featurettes from the standard DVD special edition.

blankguide.gif

Set in a post-apocalyptic world where technology has failed and mankind is living by a thread after a plague sweeps the land, Survivors (BBC, Not Rated, DVD-$79.98 SRP) was creator Terry Nation’s take on an oft-told tale, but a well told take nonetheless. This new box set contains the complete run, plus a documentary and photo galleries. It’s gotten a release because the modern day remake is hitting DVD with Survivors: The Complete Seasons One And Two (BBC, Not Rated, DVD-$59.98 SRP), a slicker, if not better, update. Bonus materials include featurettes and profiles.

blankguide.gif

Featuring rare footage from his own personal collection, Andy Kaufman: World Inter-Gender Wrestling Champion (Microwerks, Not Rated, DVD-$19.98 SRP) is a documentary about the most controversial – and some say professionally destructive – period of the late comedian’s career. Regardless, it’s an interesting look into the mind of an original.

blankguide.gif

In the mood for a mildly entertaining romantic comedy with likeable actors that won’t cause upset and will quickly wash off after it’s all over? Well, then It’s Complicated (Universal, Rated R, Blu-Ray-$36.98 SRP) is for you. Starring Meryl Streep & Alec Baldwin as a divorced couple on good terms who begin to rekindle their romance – which is rather awkward for his young wife and Streep’s new beau (Steve Martin). Bonus materials include an audio commentary and a making-of featurette.

blankguide.gif

Remember that surprisingly chilling horror film a few years back about a team of female spelunkers who are hunted by subterranean creatures during an expedition gone wrong? You know, [The Descent]? Well, now it all gets a bit naffer with The Descent Part 2 (Lionsgate, Rated R, DVD-$28.98 SRP), which finds the survivor of the original film forced to go back into the caves, by the local sheriff, on a search mission for her missing companions. Bonus materials include an audio commentary, featurettes, deleted scenes, and a storyboard gallery.

blankguide.gif

I’m not a fan, but there are plenty of kids who adore the little red monster and will probably happy tap along with Sesame Street: The Best Of Elmo 2 (Warner Bros., Not Rated, DVD-$14.98 SRP), which contains almost an hour’s worth of the furry bastard. Now where the DVD release of Kermit’s best bits?

blankguide.gif

A surprising and welcome arrival on DVD is the second volume collecting On The Road with Charles Kuralt (Acorn, Not Rated, DVD-$39.99 SRP) – the Emmy-winning travelogue that featured Kuralt, a motor home, and destinations and personalities across the breadth of the United States. The 3-disc set features 18 episodes, plus updates.

blankguide.gif

While not as funny as some of their previous television incarnations, there’s still plenty of fun to be had in the second season of Tracey Ullman’s State Of The Union (Eagle Media, Not Rated, DVD-$19.93 SRP), which finds her playing 53 different characters rooted in American life. Bonus materials include deleted scenes, featurettes, sing-alongs, and more.

blankguide.gif

Cross Doo Wop with [The Sunshine Boys] and you have The Dukes (E1, Rated PG-13, DVD-$24.98 SRP), a pretty fun little caper comedy about a down on their hells Doo Wop group who decides to stage a comeback – only this comeback involves stealing 35 pounds of gold. The cast – Robert Davi, Chazz Palminteri, & Peter Bogdanovich – are clearly having fun. Bonus features include an audio commentary, interviews, and deleted scenes.

blankguide.gif

It’s a bit disconcerting as you try and process the age difference in the 70’s-filmed [Honeymooners Specials], which brought the cast back together for one last spin as The Kramdens and The Nortons, but once you get into it, the old magic is there. The Second Honeymoon (MPI, Not Rated, DVD-$14.98 SRP) finds Ralph and Alice renewing their vows on their 25th wedding anniversary, while Valentine Special (MPI, Not Rated, DVD-$14.98 SRP) is pretty self-explanatory. Both discs also contain rare parody skits.

blankguide.gif

Translated from its smash Broadway run and bringing Andy Griffith and Don Knotts together on screen for the first time, No Time For Sergeants (Warner Bros., Not Rated, DVD-$19.98 SRP) is one of those comedies that I’ve been waiting eagerly for, and this remastered edition is a welcome arrival.

blankguide.gif

With Memorial Day right around the corner, Warners has dipped into the archives for some manly men classics to release as part of their TCM: Greatest Classic Films Collection. The first, TCM Classics: Westerns (Warner Bros., Not Rated, DVD-$27.98 SRP), contains [The Stalking Moon], [Ride The High Country], [Pat Garrett And Billy The Kid], & [Chisum]. TCM Classics: War (Warner Bros., Not Rated, DVD-$27.98 SRP) sports [Battle Of The Bulge] , [The Dawn Patrol], [Gunga Din], & [Operation Pacific]. I just wish both releases weren’t on those damn flipper discs.

blankguide.gif

By the time we reach the Saturday Morning Cartoons: 1980s collection (Warner Bros., Not Rated, DVD-$26.98 SRP), we’ve pretty much reached the border between nostalgia and embarrassment, as the offerings on hand in this 2-disc overview of the decade’s animated offerings includes the likes of Mister T, Chuck Norris, Ed Grimley, Thundarr, and The Biskitts. At least there’s a little featurette on the history of Thundarr.

blankguide.gif

Tony Stark becomes a teenage superhero in Nickelodeon’s Iron Man: Armored Adventures (Genius, Not Rated, DVD-$29.93 SRP), which I assume is a change meant to appeal to kids – although why one would think they couldn’t identify with a 30-something multibillionaire arms manufacturer, I’ll never know. The 4-disc box set contains all 26 episodes, plus storyboards and original sketches.

blankguide.gif

See a man do some incredibly foolish things to his body in the name of adventure in Man Vs. Wild: Season 4 (Discovery, Not Rated, DVD-$24.98 SRP). The man in question is crazy survivalist Bear Grylls, and the 3-disc set contains all 13 episodes, plus extended scenes and a preview episode.

blankguide.gif

It’s another quarter of episodes to entertain the kiddies with Go Diego Go!: The Great Panda Adventure (Nickelodeon, Not Rated, DVD-$16.99 SRP) which – in addition to adventures with pandas, lemurs, koalas, and beavers – also features a pair of videos from the Fresh Bat Band.

blankguide.gif

It seems like there’s been a couple hundred editions released, but the new special edition of Dirty Dancing (Lionsgate, Rated PG-13, DVD-$29.98 SRP) sports a brand new, damn spiffy video transfer that makes the film look better than it ever has in any previous release. Bonus features include audio commentaries, featurettes, documentaries, a tribute to Patrick Swayze, outtakes, interviews, music videos, and much more. A Blu-Ray edition ($34.99 SRP) is also available, with identical bonus materials.

blankguide.gif

So there you have it… my humble suggestions for what to watch, listen to, play with, or waste money on this coming weekend. See ya next week…

-Ken Plume

##

Trailer Park: IRON MAN 2

By Christopher Stipp

The Archives, Right Here

Check out my new column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

Robin Hood – Free Passes

robinhood_posterWho lives in Arizona and wants to see Russell Crowe dispatch dirty peasants with a bow and arrow?

I sure do. After loving every last morsel of the last Russell Crowe/Ridley Scott team-up this film at least gets an emotional buy-in simply because lighting may very well strike twice.

For those that would like to see this film Tuesday, May 11th, at 7:00 at Harkins Fashion Square please shoot me a line at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com and let me know you’re interested in winning some tickets. I don’t have many so get those entries in quick.

And, for those that need an explanation of what this movie has in store for you, read the film’s description:

Oscar winner Russell Crowe stars as the legendary figure known by generations as “Robin Hood,” whose exploits have endured in popular mythology and ignited the imagination of those who share his spirit of adventure and righteousness. In 13th century England, Robin and his band of marauders confront corruption in a local village and lead an uprising against the crown that will forever alter the balance of world power. And whether thief or hero, one man from humble beginnings will become an eternal symbol of freedom for his people.

The untitled Robin Hood adventure chronicles the life of an expert archer, previously interested only in self-preservation, from his service in King Richard’s army against the French. Upon Richard’s death, Robin travels to Nottingham, a town suffering from the corruption of a despotic sheriff and crippling taxation, where he falls for the spirited widow Lady Marion (Oscar winner Cate Blanchett), a woman skeptical of the identity and motivations of this crusader from the forest. Hoping to earn the hand of Maid Marion and salvage the village, Robin assembles a gang whose lethal mercenary skills are matched only by its appetite for life. Together, they begin preying on the indulgent upper class to correct injustices under the sheriff.

With their country weakened from decades of war, embattled from the ineffective rule of the new king and vulnerable to insurgencies from within and threats from afar, Robin and his men heed a call to ever greater adventure. This unlikeliest of heroes and his allies set off to protect their country from slipping into bloody civil war and return glory to England once more.

Tokyo Sonata – DVD Review

tokyosonata_3dSuch an endearing film, this movie from Kiyoshi Kurosawa explores some of the more quiet aspects of live in modern Japan.

One of the funny things about Kurosawa is that most who do know his name know it from his work in the horror genre. A movie that departs greatly from that wheelhouse, Tokyo Sonata is an overlooked gem from last year that not only reaffirmed my own sense of what it means to be a family but that Kurosawa knows how to transcend cultural mores and tell a story about a man who loses his job and tries to hold on to the lie as kids, wife unravel before his eyes.

It’s a bittersweet movie that is genuinely funny but it’s also an introspective film that is gorgeous to look at while seeing that there is some real pathos happening before you. The performances are uniformly excellent especially Kyoko Koizumi, who plays the put upon matriarch of the family, who becomes something of a force to reckon with as she evolves in this family that tries to pull through what is ostensibly the most difficult time in their lives.

Do not miss what I wish I could have seen in the theaters, the lush cinematography showing the natural ebb and flow of life in Japan, and a movie that can speak to what modern families have to deal with in a time that knows no geographical or social boundaries.

About the film:

FROM INTERNATIONALLY-RENOWNED DIRECTOR KIYOSHI KUROSAWA COMES A “HAUNTING AND MASTERFUL” FILM, WINNER OF THE PRESTIGIOUS CANNES UN CERTAIN REGARD JURY PRIZE

Best known in the United States for unsettling horror films like PULSE and CURE, internationally recognized director Kiyoshi Kurosawa ventures away from the genre with TOKYO SONATA. Probing the dark side of human nature and the social problems that confront contemporary Japan, this highly acclaimed 2009 theatrical release was awarded the Un Certain Regard Jury Prize at the 2009 Cannes Film Festival, as well as capturing Best Film and Best Screenwriter at the Asian Film Awards.

Equal parts social commentary and situational comedy, the atmospheric TOKYO SONATA is a story of an ordinary Japanese family of four. The father, Ryuhei Sasaki, like any other Japanese businessman, is faithfully devoted to his work. His wife, Megumi, left on her own to manage the house, struggles to retain a bond with her oldest son in college, Takashi, and the youngest, Kenji, a sensitive boy in elementary school. From the exterior the family is seemingly normal, save for the tiny schisms that exist within. However, after Ryuhei unexpectedly loses his job, the quiet unraveling of the family beings.

Facing completely unfamiliar circumstances, Ryuhei decides not to tell his family and begins his lonely sojourn into the world of the secretly unemployed. Along with many other businessmen who save face by concealing their shameful reality from family and friends, Ryuhei begins to depart each day for work, when, in fact, he kills time in libraries and parks. His lies and torment go unnoticed by Takashi, who becomes increasingly despondent and alienated from his family, and Megumi, who can no longer summon the will to keep her family together. And, the longer his charade goes on, the less control he has as patriarch, creating an even deeper divide between him and his family.

TOKYO SONATA is presented in Japanese with English subtitles, and includes a “Making Of” Featurette, Cannes Festival Footage and Panel Interviews and Interviews with the Cast and Crew.

California Dreamin’ – DVD Review

califronia-dreamin_2d_hWhen I was in Ireland I picked up a book called “Turn Left at Greenland.”

It was a book that talked about what America looks like through the eyes of a foreign news correspondent living and working within our borders. It was an odd thing, seeing our country from someone that doesn’t call this home but it’s perfectly apt in order to describe the feeling of watching this movie from filmmaker, and Romanian, Cristian Nemescu.

The movie deals with a military intelligence officer, played with deft playfulness by Armand Assante, who finds himself stuck on the way to Kosovo in some faceless Romanian that could be any number of small hamlets in this part of the world, that has to navigate his way out of being held almost hostage in a farce that at once illuminates what we look like to others and how we deal with ourselves. The ugly American, uncouth around those who are simply living their own lives as we try and impose our will to fit our needs, is on full display here but the reason this movie excels masterfully is because how sly it is. It’s not enough to come right out and say what’s on this film’s mind, this movie plays with your expectations and lets the action on the screen tell the story.

Is America the strong willed bully who likes to play the part of imperialist? If Nemescu’s movie is any indication it is but there are bright spots to be found within its stubbornness. Make no mistake about it, either. Nemescu skewers his own culture as well, pointing out that while we have our own problems no one is perfect by any stretch.

It’s disappointing that this is Nemescu’s only film, he died in a car accident before being able to properly edit this film down before it made its bow at Cannes in 2007, but this is a gem of a movie that talks global politics that still have meaning today in an age when this film explains so much about our involvement inside Pakistan and Iraq.

About the film:

THE AWARD-WINNING ““ AND ONLY ““ FILM FROM ONE OF THE WORLD’S GREAT YOUNG DIRECTORS, WHO DIED BEFORE ITS RELEASE

In the tradition of great black comedies about war ““ from Dr. Strangelove and M*A*S*H to Three Kings and In the Loop ““ comes CALIFORNIA DREAMIN’, one of the masterpieces of what’s been called the Romanian new wave. This vital and globally honored movie was the only feature film from brilliant young director Cristian Nemescu.

The fact-based story proves that truth is stranger ““ and more absurd ““ than fiction. It’s 1999, and the bloody civil war in Yugoslavia is underway. A platoon of American Marines has arrived in Constanta , Romania , with a shipment of military radar meant to be deployed near the Serbian border in support of NATO air raids. No-nonsense Captain Doug Jones (Golden Globe winner Armand Assante in a career performance) is in charge of transporting the equipment by train across Romania , but when the train is stopped in a remote village, Jones and his men must contend with the corrupt and terrifying stationmaster, Doiaru (Razvan Vasilescu), who’s also the local strongman and black market operator. The Marines become the “guests” of a poor village filled with frustrating bureaucracy, sexy young women on the make, and odd pop culture celebrations. Can Americans really bring order and hope to this chaotic part of the world, or is that just California dreamin’?

Five Minutes of Heaven – DVD Review

fmoh_3d_lThis is a movie that you ought to seek out and enjoy for the high level of screenwriting and visual flair for cinematography.

A movie about two men, James Nesbitt and Liam Neeson, Catholic and Protestant respectively, who both had a part in the fighting that took place in the mid-1970s as these two religious groups fought a bloody war of politics and religion. All grown up, they are being chauffeured for a face-to-face, televised meeting. The real draw of the film, then, is how these two men find themselves here as they reflect on the events of their youth.

Filled with murder and rage, both men have their own sins to atone for but Oliver Hirschbiegel, director of the indescribably good Downfall, looks at these two people not to be pitied but to be understood. Screenwriter Guy Hibbert’s script is filled with moments that let you know this is a writer’s film, not a movie based on the quick cuts and violence you would expect out of a Tom Clancy novel if it were to be written about this chance meeting.

The rage that still simmers beneath the thin veneer of older age is deliciously depicted and honestly makes the case as to why there is some pain that will never be sated until revenge is exacted. But the movie is so much more than revenge fantasies and recompense, it’s a movie that should leave you thinking about how our own conflicts, no matter how personal they may be, can find a way to be exercised. I found my palms sweaty more than once and it’s due to a movie that wants to personalize, not dehumanize, it’s characters.

Seek this film out if a jangling Irish accent and the allure of a movie that wants to take its time with you is something you desire. Revenge is a dish best served cold but what happens after it’s on the table? This movie tells you exactly what happens.

About the film:

IN A PLACE WHERE BLOODY CONFLICT IS ALL MANY PEOPLE HAVE EVER KNOWN, SOME WOUNDS MAY PROVE TOO DEEP FOR TIME TO HEAL

Liam Neeson Stars in the Latest Triumph From Oscar® Nominee Oliver Hirschbiegel.

“The past is not dead. In fact, it isn’t even past.” The famous line from Faulkner could serve to describe FIVE MINUTES OF HEAVEN, the acclaimed suspenseful thriller about the long-lasting pain caused by the Troubles in Northern Ireland . That violent conflict has been the basis for many memorable movies, but few as gripping as Oscar-nominated director Oliver Hirschbiegel’s film, which features career performances by international stars Liam Neeson and James Nesbitt.

FIVE MINUTES OF HEAVEN is based on true events. It’s 1975 and conflict has been underway for years between the predominantly Catholic nationalists who want to end British control of Northern Ireland and the predominantly Protestant loyalists. Alistair Little, a 16-year-old Protestant member of the Ulster Volunteer Force, is anxious to earn his stripes and, along with his group, is given the go-ahead to kill an Ulster Catholic as reprisal for IRA attacks. Their target is 19-year-old Jim Griffen. The murder is witnessed by Griffen’s 11-year-old brother Joe.

Three decades later, Little (Neeson, star of “Taken” and “Schindler’s List”) has been rehabilitated and released from prison, while Joe Griffen (Nesbitt, who led the cast of Paul Greengrass’ Northern Ireland historical drama “Bloody Sunday”) remains traumatized and bitter. When a television talk show brings them together for a live on-air reconciliation, two men haunted by one moment must come face to face with their own worlds of pain and violence ““ and the ever-present threat of revenge.

FIVE MINUTES OF HEAVEN won the Directing Award and the World Cinema Screenwriting Award, and was nominated for the Grand Jury Prize, at the 2009 Sundance Film Festival.

Oliver Hirschbiegel previously directed the Best Foreign-Language Film Oscar nominee “Downfall,” about Hitler’s final days, and the sci-fi thriller “The Invasion,” starring Nicole Kidman and Daniel Craig. BAFTA-winning screenwriter Guy Hibbert’s impressive body of work includes “Omagh” and “Prime Suspect.” Also in the FIVE MINUTES OF HEAVEN cast is Anamaria Marinca, star of the Cannes Golden Palm winner “4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days” as well as Francis Ford Coppola’s “Youth Without Youth.”

Iron Man 2 – Review

4918_1594708762When last we left our hero, he was on a podium proclaiming himself to be the real iron man. There was much fanfare and celebration but how does Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) fare in issue 2 of this comic book character come to life?

Well, considering this is perhaps the most expensive romantic comedy ever made I would say it’s a success on multiple levels.

That’s one of the things you’ll notice, if you’re feeling your way through Jon Favreau’s latest, a real sense that this is a pure four quadrant movie that appeals to every single, last demographic. It seems made with the intent to fully embrace every last man, woman, and child with its focus on bringing the most amount of action with the most amount of family friendly permissible T&A along with peppering the dialogue with enough mature bon mots and double entendres to make any parent squirmy. There seems to be a real need to be liked on all levels going on within this picture that you can’t help but feel that Favreau has delivered a movie that gives the people what they want, all of them, and, what’s remarkable, there isn’t any slack in this film. Every moment is earned, every line pushing this film to its eventual breaking point. I think, and if there is any indication that this movie isn’t as good as it could have been I couldn’t point it out, the movie doesn’t take a definitive stance with regard to its voice. In much the same way that Dark Knight had its voice, how X2 absolutely had one that set it apart from its peers and how Spider-Man 2 possessed one that made it a classic, Iron Man 2 is lacking in that regard. There are missed opportunities to delve deep into the man who wears this suit of iron, passed over chances to get beyond the snappy one-liners (and they are snappy thanks to Justin Theroux’s ear for witty rejoinders and Downey Jr.’s unmatchable delivery, creating a character with his own unique patios), and it all adds up to a movie that truly embraces the summer movie aesthetic in the most fun way possible.

Meeting up with Stark, mere moments after where the first movie leaves off, we are right back to where we were when we last saw him. Basking in the glorious attention and filled with the kind of macho, funny bravado that made him such a delight in part 1. He’s in dire need of purpose when we meet up with him, although his tough candy shell would rather deflect than recognize how empty his castle really is, and this movie is all about this man’s quest for something more than dominance over the scientific and controllable. It’s a movie about a man’s need for love not only from the man who made him but from a woman that confounds him. What’s curious about the latter storyline is that it permeates the entire film. Tony tries to communicate the very human feelings which he’s been so adept at keeping sublimated towards Pepper Potts (Gwyneth Paltrow) but, like every good romantic comedy, it’s never quite the right time. The movie is brilliant in keeping every person who is seeing this movie invested on what’s happening, like a politician who relentlessly plays to his constituents, but that’s also where the movie loses its ability to some something more than just a great summer film.

One of the story’s issues is Downey’s indulgence in excess, namely alcohol. Saving you the pain of getting into too much comic book fanboy detail there was a nine issue story arc within the Iron Man series in 1979 that dealt with Tony’s alcoholism. It was hailed then, and still is now, as one of the most important stories of the Iron Man saga. This was a chance to give the film a deep anchor, an opportunity for resonance far beyond the box office, but instead the subplot is given short shrift, relegated to a relatively quick realization and fixing of a problem as if it were a cut needing a band-aid. It was disappointing to see it used and rushed though so flippantly but, to come back as to why the film works on the levels it does, you can see why that decision was made. Mass appeal does not equate to an episode of Intervention, hence, it was ditched. Besides, he’s got bad guys to dispatch.

The villains of this picture, Mickey Rourke and Sam Rockwell, play opposite ends of the evil spectrum that simply boggle the mind. Rockwell, playing arms manufacturer Justin Hammer, ought to be the kind of slippery cad that knows no boundaries and delight in being the kind of foil to Tony Stark worthy of our condemnation. Instead, he’s played like an ass, a buffoon. It confounds the mind to try and think of why you would want to have a man capable of so much dirty dealing and evil come off like a doofus who is only able to get out of bed without hurting himself by happenstance. Or, is it because Mickey Rourke, as the mighty Whiplash, tries to steal the show as he turns in a performance as one of the better villains we’ve ever been given in a movie like this? Unfortunately, there is not much to steal as we only get fits and starts with regard to his character, he appears briefly and we aren’t really given much beyond a few biographical factoids and tidbits. To Rourke’s credit, however, he uses what little time is given him to his advantage. Coming off a sympathetic turn in The Wrestler, he is able to play that other side, where the villainy oozes out of every dirty pore, every unwashed piece of hair.

The film’s action set pieces, much like the first, are good and serviceable to a large degree. The CGI elements are pronounced in some areas and do take away from some of the passion that no doubt we’re supposed to feel as Iron Man defends truth, justice and the American way. If Justin Hammer’s eventual downfall is any representational barometer of the final act it is that the film’s action ends with a little more than a fizzled dream; exciting and somewhat filled with potential, sure, but it all comes crashing down quickly and with little more than a mild skirmish which ends exactly the way it should with there being no real danger to anyone or anything. Favreau hasn’t or didn’t learn anything from the all too brief ending to the first film as you go from final confrontation to resolution at breakneck speed. There is no savoring of the moment, no real drama, and the film suffers because of it. Not to be too glib about it but once the final confrontation happens you only have seconds to pay attention or else risk seeing how the ending plays itself out.

Iron Man 2 as a summer artifact is one that fulfills every promise of what a summer tent pole should be: loud, bright, quick, and filled with enough for everyone. It’s a movie that will appeal to a wide spectrum of people on many levels. However, if there is anything to take away from this movie it is that this was a film that consciously decided it was not going to be anything more than what we’ve been given. It’s serviceable, fun but it lacks anything that will carry on long after you see the final moments on the screen. It’s disappointing that it couldn’t stretch beyond comic book-like depth but it’s nonetheless a good reason to get out of the house and enjoy on a big screen.

Contest Round-Up: 2010-05-06

Filed under: Articles — Tags: , , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:18 am

contestheader.jpg

Welcome to our weekly round-up of featured giveaways here at FRED. Every week, we’ll present a new clutch of DVDs, books, and other cool stuff you can take a shot at winning. All you have to do is click on the graphics below to be taken to their respective contest pages. And good luck!

In conjunction with BBC Home Video, we’re giving away four (4) copies of DALZIEL & PASCOE: SEASON 1 on DVD.

In conjunction with Warner Bros. Home Video, we’re giving away five (5) copies of SESAME STREET: THE BEST OF ELMO 2 on DVD.

Win SESAME STREET: THE BEST OF ELMO 2 on DVD!

Filed under: Contests — Tags: , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:16 am

contestheader.jpg

In conjunction with Warner Bros. Home Video, we’re giving away five (5) copies of SESAME STREET: THE BEST OF ELMO 2 on DVD.

Contest ends at 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, May 19th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of FRED Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

One entry per day, per person.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, May 19th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

Win DALZIEL & PASCOE: SEASON 1 on DVD!

Filed under: Contests — Tags: , , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:03 am

contestheader.jpg

In conjunction with BBC Home Video, we’re giving away four (4) copies of DALZIEL & PASCOE: SEASON 1 on DVD.

Contest ends at 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, May 19th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of FRED Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

One entry per day, per person.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, May 19th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

May 6, 2010

Ken P. D. Snyde-Cast #146: Flip Flop

Filed under: Ken P.D. Snydecast — Tags: , , , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 4:29 pm

snydecast-header.png

snydecast-logo2.png

Adult Swim’s Dana Snyder and FRED’s Ken Plume set out to have a literate conversation between two pals, but inevitably devolve into a verbal, and funny, free-for-all full of bickering, infighting, and the special kind of male bonding that comes from conflict expressed through the podcast medium.

Actor/comedian/raconteur Dana Snyder, you’re certainly aware, is Aqua Teen Hunger Force’s Master Shake, Squidbillies‘ Granny, Minoriteam’s Dr. Wang, and The Venture Bros.‘ Alchemist. Available for weddings and bar mitzvahs (bat availability pending), you can keep tabs on him via his website, www.eyeofthesnyder.com.

Ken Plume is the editor-in-chief here at FRED. He is a friend of Dana’s, as well as his arch-nemesis.

VISIT THE SNYDECAST EXPERIENCE

linesm.gif

KEN P.D. SNYDECAST #146: Flip Flop – Ken & Dana return to taunt each other with electronics ogling that’s sure to financially ruin them both.

[CONTENT WARNING]: This podcast may contain some foul language and horribly off-color jokes. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
Episode #146 (MP3 format)

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/snydecast/ken_p_d_snyde_cast-146.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

Got something to say? E-mail Dana & Ken at the Snydecast mailbag.

line.gif

CLICK HERE FOR THE SNYDECAST ARCHIVES

line.gif

##

May 5, 2010

TV Or Not TV: I Vote YES for The Candidate (LOST)

Filed under: TV Or Not TV — Tags: — admin @ 11:33 pm

tvornottv-header.png

Before I delve into anything about the May 4th episode of LOST I just have to say that there was some very surprising news that I almost didn’t hear on JIMMY KIMMEL LIVE later that same night. I’ve been a long time fan of KIMMEL but haven’t watched or DVR’d the show for a long time because I work and already can’t watch all the TV I’ve already got on my plate (another reason to get the HD TiVO already so I can go portable too!). Yesterday, however, Executive Producer of LOST Damon Lindelof sent out the following Tweet:

Sorry, that’s the one I read in my head after watching THE CANDIDATE. The real Tweet was:

JORGE GARCIA was a guest and just at the close of the interview, almost drowned out by the cheers of the crowd and the band as they go to commercial KIMMEL made the special announcement that LOST’s climax would not take up two hours of television programming time that night. It would actually take up 2 and a half hours of programming time. Yup, the series finale just got 22 minutes longer folks because (I’m assuming and hoping) they just couldn’t cram that much awesome into the time they were given.

Now that we’ve gotten that bit of business out of the way, and since I’m sure you’ve already heard or read the news about the finale, let’s move on to taking a look at what happened on the 14th episode of this final season titled THE CANDIDATE. As always I remind you that I write this with the assumption that you are reading this because you’ve already seen the episode so if you haven’t this is your final warning.

I was really looking forward to sitting down today and writing out the fact that I in fact hit the nail on the head with a prediction I had made. I was all excited and I went back to find out what column I had written it in and much to my own horror it turns out that I never actually seemed to write it. This really bummed me out so let me now tell you the words that I could have sworn that I put down in print.

I don’t like to speculate on what is coming up but I really hope that the ‘Candidates’ don’t some how get tricked into going along with whatever UN-LOCKE/SMOKEY JOE has planned. He’s not ‘allowed’ to kill the candidates so this means that he probably wants and needs to kill the candidates. Every time he says he needs them all to get off the ISLAND the part of the sentence that I hear him purposely leaving out is the word ‘dead’ after all and before to get off the ISLAND.

I don’t know what article I completely abandoned and discarded some time after writing that but oh how I wish I still had it to present to you as proof that I saw this one coming. Explained as simply as the way I had before pressing the delete button it’s pretty clear, right? At least I did say in this week’s column for recommendations that with the remaining number of episodes of LOST there was a high probability of an important character body count increase this week, so there’s one for the win column.

Yes, that’s right those of you who didn’t take my warning and have no idea what happened in THE CANDIDATE, main characters died. I knew it was going to happen the very moment that UN-LOCKE/SMOKEY JOE handed JACK his backpack that the previously seen explosives were going to be in that backpack. If UN-LOCKE had a big bad guy soup handle mustache when he handed that backpack over he would have been twirling it with one finger and saying “mwuahahaha” under his breath.

So with most of our favorite LOST-ies stuck in a submarine they found the bomb and did everything wrong. SAYID took a final shot at redemption by grabbing the bomb and running to the other side of the sub before he was blown to bits (which makes sense because SAYID is so bad ass he HAD to go out in a blaze of glory). Our favorite pilot FRANK took a flying door to the face and JIN stayed with SUN after she was trapped behind debris proving that true love means staying with someone so you both can die together. I personally would have had JIN try to break my hip or pelvis so I could be pried out from behind the wreckage but clearly it was time to lighten the load.

This show did leave me with a lot of questions, but not in the usual LOST sense. I wouldn’t say I’m pondering plot holes however there are certain things that don’t add up to me.

  • After SAYID some how gets through the sonic fence he cuts the generator power so all the LOST-ies can be un-caged after UN-LOCKE as SMOKEY JOE takes care of the guards. Shortly after there are two guards at the plane. Why didn’t SMOKEY JOE just go all kinds of nuts and make a clean sweep of the whole smaller ISLAND?
  • JACK figured the bomb couldn’t go off because UN-LOCKE can’t kill any of them. Just like the stick of dynamite he shared with RICHARD ALPERT he’s convinced that nothing will happen. (Think of it like a mathproblem LOCKE can’t kill Candidate and LOCKE makes bomb so LOCKE BOMB can’t kill Candidate). SAWYER doesn’t believe him, pulls the leads, and the timer stops only to quickly speed up (No Mr. Bond, I expect you to DIE!). How is tampering with a bomb different then JACK lighting the fuse on a stick of dynamite if he too can’t kill himself? I have to believe that JACK’s logic was somewhat flawed because he was able to get out of the situation alive so the magic voodoo power of the ISLAND or whatever didn’t need to intercede. This could mean that JACK is probably going to be there to the very end (and doesn’t bode well for SAWYER since he pulled the wires and ka-BOOM!). This is kind of funny to think about since the original intention was to kill JACK at the end of the show’s PILOT episode.
  • Where the hell was CHARLES WIDMORE after the first five minutes? Did he know that LOCKE was coming and made way for the main ISLAND to try to fulfill his electronmagnetic dreams?

The flash-sidewayswhateveritis also pointed out something else that, if allowed to play out, won’t bode very well for flash-sidewayswhateveritis SAWYER since he still has a blood feud with ANTHONY COOPER who it now turns out is a vegetable. Sorry SAWYER, no revenge for you in the other dimension/reality/confusion. This also is the only real revelation to come out of the flash-sidewayswhateveritis other than the fact that LOCKE mutters things about the ISLAND in his sleep and once again JACK is found to be looking into a mirror, this time that of the music box his father left CLAIRE.

Just as many on the Internet have suspected it’s pretty clear that SAYID didn’t in fact kill DESMOND. His little speach about leaving something in a well caused millions of female viewers to cheer all at once.

The one thing that was nice to see was something we haven’t really seen in a while on LOST: actual mourning. After escaping the submarine of doom the quartet of Hurley, Jack, Sawyer and Kate now realize that from all of flight 815 they are all that is left. They’ve just lost two definite friends, 1 kinda friend and 1 dude they shared a secret with. They break down. They cry. All of them (well, except Sawyer because he got bonked on the head and is out of it). It was nice to finally show these characters have a real moment after all hell broke loose. They’re usually running around and dealing with seven types of crazy so they haven’t really had these moments recently. Nice touch.

That’s all I’ve really got to reflect on this week folks. Next week’s episode is titled ACROSS THE SEA and I’m pretty sure it’s going to be an AB AETERNO style flashback look at the life of JACOB and UN-LOCKE/SMOKEY JOE, which is perfectly timed since it’s pretty clear now that even though JACOB isn’t a saint SMOKEY JOE is pretty much THE bad guy.

See you next week!

« Newer Posts — Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress