FRED Entertainment

March 24, 2006

Scrubs Blog: Week 19

Filed under: Production Blogs,Quickcasts,Scrubs Blog,Video — UncaScroogeMcD @ 3:38 pm
scrubsheader.jpg


VIDEO BLOG #38: “My Second Mailbag” ““
Executive Producer Randall Winston answers a whole slew of your questions in the second installment of our fan mailbag. If you have a question you’d like answered by the cast and crew, send it in”¦ But hurry up, since time is running out before the season wraps!

19-scrubs-01.jpg

Download Scrubs Video Blog #38:

  • Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 142.10 MB)
  • Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 63.12 MB)


VIDEO BLOG #39: “My Best Scrubs” ““
Costume Designer Carey Bennett explains the difference between regular ol’ medical scrubs and the scrubs featured on the show ““ and how you can get a set of your own.

19-scrubs-02.jpg

Download Scrubs Video Blog #39:

  • Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 24.82 MB)
  • Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 10.61 MB)


VIDEO BLOG #40: “My Little Hints” ““
A lot of you have been intimidated by the most recent trivia contest, so here’s a few hints to help you on your way.

19-scrubs-03.jpg

Download Scrubs Video Blog #40:

  • Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 10.38 MB)
  • Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 4.47 MB)

##

March 17, 2006

Trailer Park: Sam Jaeger

Filed under: Interviews,Trailer Park — admin @ 8:52 pm

E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | By Christopher Stipp

March 17, 2006

JAEGER MEISTER

In this special, super-sized version of the Trailer Park, now with Riboflavin, I’ve got a lot of reading material for you peeps out there.

First up is an interview I did a few weeks ago with Sam Jaeger, an actor who will soon be on everyone’s lips as the dude who is going to make VA history by being the first “best friend” outside of Jason Mewes to appear on screen with Kevin Smith. Sam first came to me as a guy who is in the upcoming starfest, LUCKY NUMBER SLEVIN, but in looking at his credentials I saw that there was a lot more to talk about than just shooting the crap about working with Ghandi and John McClaine. He was, genuinely, one of the warmest people I’ve been able to talk to in my tenure here at the ‘Shoot and I hope some of you aspiring actors/acresses read a little about what it’s like to survive inside the system of Hollywood while still retaining your sense of self.

Also, I’ve included a some trailer review action below the interview just in case an interview isn’t something you want to be doing with your Internets today.

And just in case you aren’t satiated by all of this writen goodness I wanted to let you know that I now can also be found writing periodically during the week over at Newsvine.com; my corner of that universe can be found right here. Not only is the site a solid destination to get all your news in one place without editorial oversight but it’s also very unique in that anyone can add to the news being reported on the site and I found that it was lacking a distinct voice in its movie coverage. Hence, I am spreading my stylistic talents like a mold virus through a piece of wet drywall. I’m testing out my skills at commenting on things that pop up during the week with regard to the movie business and I implore you to check it out and leave me some public feedback on the ‘Vine regarding what you think. My first real column was looking back at last week’s box office, commenting on Paul Haggis’ latest project and having a great time doing color commentary on Brett Ratner’s diary entry for UK Telegraph’s article on a day-in-the-life of a Hollywood director; it’s well worth your time and I am offering a free copy of the 25th Anniversiary DVD of HALLOWEEN to one random poster for any feedback left in the article’s comments section to get things started. I’ve also commented on some purported “test footage” of the new TRANSFORMERS movie that was “leaked” and offered up an opinion of this week’s announcement from theather owners’ planned push to have cell phone jammers installed in their multiplexes, or is it multiplexi?

Anyway, check it out if you can. I am confident that you won’t be sorry or let down by some additional content from yours truly; plus, and this is key, if you think it sucks harder than Paul Haggis’ CRASH you can publicly flog me for all to see. That alone should be worth the price of free admission.

Now, on with the column!

Usually interviews take on a rather superficial element not usually found in natural conversations; the actor/actress needs me in order to pimp their product and I, in turn, am looking for something intriguing enough to keep me involved and exciting enough to make you, the reader, curious enough to keep reading.

I have been fortunate that most every conversation I’ve had with someone involved in the making of a film or project has had a unique perspective on their respective roles within it. I’ve loved film all my life and I know that the predicate in the words “show business” wasn’t just a clever wording. It’s a cold fact that for every wicked awesome REQUIEM FOR A DREAM there is a HOW TO LOSE A GUY IN 10 DAYS just waiting to be unleashed into our lives; it’s a matter of knowing what audience can be brought in, how much they’re going to spend and what percentage the movie will make in profit that determines, in some odd mathematical way, people’s career trajectories. Need proof? Ask Steve Guttenberg why he isn’t in X-3.

In a sense, this is what brings us today to Sam Jaeger. An actor who has performed on a lot of television shows in roles that you really didn’t pay attention to, it’s okay, I never noticed either, Sam has made a living in the past seven years doing what actors do: auditioning and praying. He’s made a life for himself, and a pretty good one, acting in shows like LAW AND ORDER, SCRUBS and THE WEST WING. Now, in a few weeks, you’ll see him on the big screen in LUCKY NUMBER SLEVIN, starring alongside Bruce Willis, Ben Kingsley, Stanley Tucci, Lucy Liu, Morgan Freeman and scads of others. And, for those in the know, Sam will make cinematic history of sorts in his role as Kevin Smith’s newest cinematic best friend, Mewes be dammed, in CATCH AND RELEASE, a movie that was tentatively slated to drop this spring but has been pushed back, way back, to 2007.

What Sam lacks in the numbers of people who know who he is he makes up for in a rich understanding of the machine that is his career: Hollywood actor. One of the poignant things that you learn about Sam is that he has the kind of perspective that you wish other actors have. He knows the fragility of one’s career and is a realist when it comes to looking beyond the work in front of him while enjoying the ride. It’s hard to not envy a guy who not only is getting bigger and more substantial roles but is also going to be responsible for being the first man to act alongside Kevin Smith in 2007’s CATCH AND RELEASE in a starring role as Smith’s best friend with Jason Mewes nowhere to be seen.

Part one of this two part series deals with Sam’s upcoming LUCKY NUMBER SLEVIN, his thoughts on making a living by acting and shares what he thinks regarding having opportunities fall into his lap.


Well, I am glad that I am finally able to talk to you about a couple of movies you’re going to be in. Yeah, Yeah”¦ Now, I know LUCKY NUMBER SLEVIN just came out overseas in the UK and Ireland”¦

Oh, did it?

Yeah, I spent the morning reading the reviews. I was wondering if you knew why those limeys get it first and we have to wait?

You know what, as an actor, you get to know so little about these things”¦unless you’re Kevin Smith…

(Laughs)

No, I think”¦I just have no idea. I think maybe the film feels a little bit like something that Europeans would get into. It’s got sort of a PULP FICTION”¦I hope you don’t mind I’m doing dishes”¦

(The sound of rushing water fills my ear as the clink of assorted dishes also makes its way into the conversation)

No, absolutely not.

I just think it has a little more of a PULP FICTION audience that it lends itself to, a London audience to be specific. I imagine they’re testing to see how it goes over there and see what kind of momentum it can get. At least that’s my guess”¦but I’m no Weinstein.

(Laughs)

So, I take it, then, you were there when the film screened at Sundance.

I was.

How did that go?

It’s such an”¦honestly, it’s a really stupid event. No, it’s really a great event but there’s something about it. I was there for 4 days and I saw 1 movie. The movies are impossible to get into. More people are going, there are more celebrities promoting their movies and it’s difficult.

I will say one of the strange parts was that I was involved with the whole schwag part of it. You know, you walk around places and people judge how big or insignificant you are and then give you gifts accordingly. It’s one of the stupidest things I have ever been a part of (laughs) and now that I am in the process of raising funds for a movie I’m directing this summer I am like, “You know what? We can sell all of this stuff online! I’m gonna call my uncle who has an E-bay account and give it all to him!” And, that’s kind of been the game plan.

I will say that the excitement at Sundance is really unique but, at the same time, there is a part of me that has tried to avoid Hollywood as much as I can. Living in Hollywood, and I live right in the middle of Hollywood, it is in the least celebrity heavy part of all of Los Angeles. I am surrounded by mostly Latino families just living their lives, working 9 to 5 jobs, and I really almost break out into hives whenever I cross La Cienega and get into Beverly Hills. It’s just not for me. It just makes me feel real uncomfortable.

I read that you grew up in the Midwest”¦Perrysburg, Ohio.

Yes, I grew up there and spent the rest of my life in LA. No, I’m kidding, I actually lived there all my life.

I can relate a little bit to you as the first time I visited Hollywood I was fresh off living in Illinois for nearly all my life and when I stepped into it I just couldn’t help but feel that it was a little weird. It didn’t feel real, it’s like reality but with a heavy coat of varnish on top of it.

Yeah. It’s a disappointing place to visit. You can see people come off the buses and it’s like, “What the hell? THIS is the magic machine?” And it’s not like I am disenchanted as I lived in New York for three years before coming out here and I like that Hollywood, at the least the middle of Hollywood, isn’t full of Rodeo folk. The people here are just trying to go about their work, their thing.

And the funny thing about going to Sundance was that my girlfriend and I were like, “You know, we flew a 1,000 miles to get away from people like this”¦And they all came.”

Is that what’s it come to? You hear people say of an annual event, no matter how great it is, that it’s never as good as it used to be.

Absolutely.

That seems to be the whole theme of this year’s event was to talk about how it’s declining and the coverage is all about who’s hanging with Eva Longoria. Is the hype real or are there quality independent films still making their splash at this event?

Well, I think there was a need by some people to try and keep it an independent festival and, I can’t remember the selections, but the ones that were crowned king and queen of the festival were movies that could really be helped with a prize for distribution.

I think, when you come down to it, a great movie is a great movie. It just feels like the festival is engulfed by Hollywood. I guess that’s Sundance and will be Sundance for a long time to come. I don’t see fewer people going to Sundance next year. I think it’s significantly different from when Kevin won for CLERKS but, hopefully, people will keep the focus on films that are engaging, engrossing stories.

On that note, then, how did the screening for LUCKY NUMBER SLEVIN go?

It actually went really well. I think people were really enthused. It’s a movie that kind of keeps you on your heels the whole time and it’s kind of like a puzzle that you piece together as the film goes along. It was a huge, the biggest theater, that was showing the movie and it was a packed packed house. In fact, one of the producers had to buy his ticket online for 200 bucks.

Really?

Yeah, yeah, it was near impossible to get tickets. I was fortunate enough to get them. It was a good event. I think Paul McGuigan is a really strong director with really good instincts. Certainly, great style. I think, visually, better than WICKER PARK.

I wasn’t going to break bad on WICKER PARK but”¦

You know, it was just under acted in some of the roles. But, like in that movie, I feel, Josh Hartnett gives his best. He’s a very dedicated, charismatic actor but I think he does a wonderful job in this one.

I feel like Josh is on this bubble. He’s got these boyish features but he’s making a great run at trying to carry a complete movie on his shoulders. Did he ever mention anything about what direction he wants to see himself going in?

In the few conversations I had with him he seems to actually be someone who is focused on avoiding the traps of superstardom.

Really?

Yeah, I think he had a lot of opportunity to do those kinds of films, he did PEARL HARBOR, and I think somewhere along that line he has learned his lesson from working with these major major stars and seeing how, sometimes, unhappy and maladjusted they are. And, again, I don’t know him that well, but I think that’s one of the things he’s wary of.

One of the frustrating things about my job is that depending on who you’re talking to, as you want to have a good conversation with the person you’re engaging, there can be a plethora of information or none at all. For you, then, your resume is packed with work done on LAW & ORDER, CSI, NYPD: BLUE, SCRUBS, ER, etc”¦ but are you having to work to get these parts or are casting directors saying, “We need to have this guy”?

Well, every one of those shows I auditioned for. Nothing was handed down to me. You probably already know this but the mystique that opportunities just fall into people’s lap, and that some people can’t help but to be movie stars, or can’t help but be working actors, the same being true for writing, “He just sat at a typewriter and just had to come out of him,” it’s like”¦what a load of horseshit.

It just doesn’t happen and if it does happen then they are wrecked for the rest of their lives. I’ve been working now for almost seven years now and I would say that I have auditioned over a 1,000 times and things, eventually, fall into my lap because I do as much research and study my roles as much as I can before I go into an audition room.

I’ve just been fortunate to be a working actor for so long because I know how rare it is to be fully employed solely by acting. I just think it’s a matter of me being able to give the right performance at the right time. I will say that when I went and auditioned for CATCH AND RELEASE there was a pretty famous celebrity that walked out before I went in for the same role and I thought, “You know what? You don’t have a chance in hell so you might as well do the best you can.”

So, I walked in, I met Susannah, she was kind of reserved and I did the first scene and she had me go back and do it again and she said, “Great, Moving on”¦” And I thought, “Ok. She thinks I am a good actor but I didn’t get the role. That’s fine.” There were three scenes and then we moved on to the second scene and she was, “Good. Third scene”¦” By this time I am convinced there is no way in hell I am getting this, “She just wants to get me out of here. This woman is done with me, maybe I insulted her kids or something”¦”

I get done, I shake hands, I leave, I get into my car, my girlfriend is waiting in the car and I say, “I did the best I could but I just don’t think I have a shot at this.” And then, a month later, I get the role.

It’s always a mystery. I think it has to do with just doing the best you can and it eventually pays off.

When you go into an audition like that are you aware of that one person who really has the final say of whether you’re hired or not? Like a producer, the director or someone else involved with the project and are you ever aware of the person you have to impress?

Yeah, it usually depends on the director. There are some directors who are taken under the wing by some producers and remain there, I think. But, Susannah, just like Kevin, is very strong. She has such a confidence and is very intelligent and very present. You can’t help but to listen to her and heed her suggestions. I think that I was pretty much an unknown compared to the rest of the cast I think it was her confidence that sold the studio on me.

I once had to audition five times for a guest-starring role on Dark Angel.

Really?

Yeah. That was a dark period in my life.

The nadir of your career…

(Laughs)

Right. My blue year. And, I didn’t even get it. This just goes back into why you just keep doing the work because I went into CATCH AND RELEASE and, 10 minutes later, I come out and a month later I get the role.

There is no specific scientific ways of getting these jobs. I just keep doing the work and then patting myself on the back because it’s all you can really do.

If I could compare the two, LUCKY NUMBER SLEVIN and CATCH AND RELEASE, big difference between production values and days spent shooting these movies? Was any one “more indie” than the other?

I think one of the things about SLEVIN was the sheer number of unbelievable actors. There was an energy there was at a little more serious than CATCH AND RELEASE. There was, and I don’t want to say a stress, but there was a tighter schedule on SLEVIN. You had to work in all these colossally vital actors into the movie and it was a balancing act plus you had 6 or 7 or 8 producers working on that film. That’s a lot of finagling.

For my role, I shot it in one week. Yet, two weeks after I am done shooting my role, they fly me back to Montreal from LA, put me in a hotel for three days, they bring me to the set, they do their thing, and, five hours later, I am back on a plane. What’s more is that they did it the following week as well. And they did it because they had all these stars that they had to accommodate.

For CATCH AND RELEASE it seemed much smoother despite rain trying to hold us back. It felt a little more like a studio film, I will say, because it felt like a 9 to 5 job, I was working at least 4 or 5 days a week but it had a little more a relaxed vibe to it.

I know Kevin kept an online diary of the production and it was nice to read about the process of making the film while getting the feel that it was causal on the set. There was work to be done but I didn’t read anywhere about some PA pounding on his door at 4 a.m. to shoot a scene.

No, it’s a night and a day difference from the independents I’ve done. I think the process has taught me a great deal about making movies, especially being around Kevin and having such a good relationship with him.

Was he schooling you while you were together? How did that relationship go?

I don’t think it could’ve gone any smoother. The funny thing is that the first time I met him it was for a table read, before the movie began, and he was talking to Timothy Olyphant, who plays the lead in the movie, and says, “I am a big fan of Deadwood, you did good work on THE GIRL NEXT DOOR”¦” and he turns to me and says, “And I have no idea what you’ve done.”

(I laugh)

And I said, “I did a killer episode of “˜That’s Life.’ I can’t believe you didn’t see it”¦” It’s a relationship you’re just lucky to have.

I have nothing but respect for the guy and I think that’s what it is. We have a mutual respect for one another. He’s a great family man, he does everything he can for his friends and family; that’s kind of how I live my life. I live for my friends and my family, the people I love and he will go to bat for anyone who he loves.

That’s really nice to say”¦

Yeah, and I also like the fact that he speaks his mind. That’s what has got him so many fans. And his fans should rest assured that he is everything that he appears to be. He’s just a guy who says it like it is.

Did you find when you were with him in a scene that he just came in, did what he was expected of him and then leave or did he ever interject with suggestions of his own about a scene?

No, but that was one of the most fascinating aspects of the movie. Here’s a director who has directed six films, has written six films and is now being directed by a first time director. It would have been a lot more uncomfortable had Susannah not been such an accomplished writer, I mean she’s written ERIN BROCKOVICH, IN HER SHOES, and she is a confident woman. Kevin trusted her and they had a great working relationship once it got rolling. If there was a button on the scene that Kevin wanted to try she would let him try it so it was like having two writers on the set.

What would you say, going into a movie like SLEVIN or CATCH AND RELEASE, are you hoping to get out of your time on a movie? Some have said, “It’s a job, it’s just work,” but is there anything intrinsic to be gained from a movie set?

I think, in the past, my goal was to not get fired. And, I speak to that. On CATCH AND RELEASE I realized about two weeks in that, “You know what? Jennifer’s preggers. There is no way they can re-shoot this shit. I am in this movie for good.” You know? “They can edit me out, fine, but they’ve gotta keep what I’ve done here somehow.”

(I laugh)

I love it.

I am only thankful to get a role. When you get a job, you want to do the best job possible. I would sometimes kill myself trying to get to this character and, coming from a background in theater, it’s an ongoing process where you try and develop a character and try to build it into something that’s comfortable but with film I’ve learned that when you get cast generally for these movies you’re already the person they were looking for because they’ve already seen 600 to 1,000 people. They don’t need you to make huge adjustments. The audition you give is often the mold they want your character in. I purposely try to lay off memorizing scenes and so forth till the day before because I know I have a tendency to overanalyze things and it can become overly stiff. And I didn’t want that to happen here because Kevin and I are supposed to be laidback guys with a really strong friendship. It wouldn’t make sense to be so strict about the lines, so meticulous.


FIND ME GUILTY (2006) Director: Sidney Lumet
Cast: Vin Diesel, Annabella Sciorra, Alex Rocco, Peter Dinklage, Ron Silver
Release: March 17, 2006 (Limited)
Synopsis: A drama based on the longest Mafia trial in U.S. history, mobster Jack DiNorscio (Diesel), faced with a series of charges, decides to stand trial instead of ratting out his family and associates. A wrench is thrown into the system when DiNorscio opts to defend himself.
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Negative. Another movie set against the backdrop of a trial?

From A FEW GOOD MEN to nearly every John Grisham I am at a loss to understand the nature of what makes these movies such an appealing genre. I do know, though, that movies that fall under this kind of filmic purview, sporting events being one that comes to mind quickly, need to do something special in order to set themselves apart. It’s almost as if these movies have to work uphill even before they get started; where any other movie just needs to be original to be noticed these kind of genre movies need to additionally set themselves apart from those they share space with on the video shelf.

This is where I am coming from when this movie opens and you get the obligatory shot of flashbulbs, hubbub, boisterous news hounds and the frumpy, velvety track suits donned by the stereotypical Italian goombahs who find themselves in a courtroom.

It’s unimpressive. It’s flat.

I am intrigued by the card that tells me that I am about to see a story that revolves around one of the biggest criminal trials in our nation’s history but without context I am just left drifting in this trailer. What’s more, and this important to note, everything builds up for what should be something worthy of serious drama but we don’t get that. We’re offered, instead, Vin Diesel, mugging to the audience of his peers and I am almost sure this is being billed as a comedy.

You’ve got a jaunty soundtrack underneath Diesel’s claim that in this “trial of the century” he’s going to defend himself by being his own lawyer; when he’s asked whether he has any legal experience he states he’s been in the can most of his life and that he thinks sometimes he has, “too much legal experience.” Oh, the uproar this causes. Everyone laughs and thinks this the funniest crap they’ve heard. Is this a trial or a Saturday night at The Sands with Dean, Frank and Sammy?

I’m not too far off here as the subsequent clips that are chosen drip with a depression inducing grey palate with Vin talking about the man who shoots him four times, expressing the misguided sentiment that it was because his “family” loves him, and the trying-too-hard-to-be-poignant moment when he tells his old lady, his girlfriend, his daughter, who knows, that even though he’s being asked to rat on his friends the best two words in the English language are “things change.”

I’m just not sure what to make of a movie billed as a drama when Vin is playing the part of MY COUSIN VINNY. There is a lot of posturing for the camera, a lot of wacky and zany outbursts all the while one of the biggest legal battles between organized crime and the government goes on.

Even if, perchance, the movie is indeed the comedic equivalent of an episode of LA LAW there seems to be real drama with Vin getting his ass beat and him having to be restrained for his outbursts.

There is a movie in here, I feel it, but if this the marketing for what appears to be a marketing campaign that doesn’t know which way to sell the product then this movie is having its feet ensconced and being dumped in the Hudson.

Scrubs Blog: Week 18

Filed under: Production Blogs,Quickcasts,Scrubs Blog,Video — UncaScroogeMcD @ 3:29 pm
scrubsheader.jpg


VIDEO BLOG #37: “My Trivia’s Return” ““
The first one was so much fun, we’re doing it again! This go round, we’re playing “Spot the Crewmember.” In this week’s video blog, you’ll see a selection of crew members who have appeared on the show – to enter, you have to identify the crewmember, the episodes in which they appeared, and in what context (in other words, describe the appearance). Note: The crew photo in episode 5×07 – “My Missed Perception” DOES NOT COUNT. That’s just too easy, people. To enter, all you have to do is submit your answers by Sunday, April 2nd (4/2/2006) at midnight EST. Three winners will be chosen at random from those entries that get the most appearances correct. The winning entries will be notified via e-mail, at which time we’ll get your mailing addresses for the prize packs. The winners will be announced in the Friday, April 7th blog. Previous winners are ineligible for prizes, but you’re certainly willing to participate. Good luck, and may the most ardent labcoats (my term for Scrubs fans, natch) win!! CONTEST IS CLOSED.

18-scrubs-02.jpg

Download Scrubs Video Blog #37:

  • Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 11.51 MB)
  • Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 5.03 MB)

##

March 10, 2006

Trailer Park: SON…OF A BI%&$!

Filed under: Trailer Park — admin @ 8:51 pm

E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | By Christopher Stipp

March 10, 2006

SON…OF A BI%&$!

It is 9:22 of the p.m. on Sunday and, so far, I am getting my ass handed to me for Oscar pics by a wife who only knows of Heath and Jake from US Weekly and picked MEMOIRS OF A GEISHA to win for Costume Design because they “look cool” and a father-in-law who got harangued into picking nominees while setting the TiVo to tape his only two staples for entertainment: old timey westerns and everything on The Nature Channel; he would later tell the fam collected to watch this reach-around fest that anything with animals or weaponry in the title got his vote, hence explaining his votes for KING KONG and SIX SHOOTER.

I think the wheels really came off for me when I started letting my idea of what I thought passed as beautifully rendered storytelling, the hallmark for every great film, get in the way for what amounted to overhyped pap. I am talking here about CRASH and even though I saw it and thought it was alright I didn’t feel very moved by its message and nor did I feel that the film’s message had any resonance.

Since I paid my $7.50 with my school ID I think I am entitled here to a moment of what I feel was the real issue with CRASH’s sudden swell of support. I think that while Paul Haggis is a swell screenwriter and able-bodied director I think he relies too heavily on convenience and falsities when rendering his character’s world. Who lives with these overtly racist caricatures? If it would please the court I would like to present Exhibit A and B in their entirety. These two passages of dialogue come from Brenden Frazier and Matt Dillion, respectively.

Rick: Why do these guys have to be black? No matter how we spin this thing, I’m either gonna lose the black vote or I’m gonna lose the law and order vote!
Karen: You know, I think you’re worrying too much. You have a lot of support in the black community.
Rick: ll right. if we can’t duck this thing, we’re gonna have to neutralize it. What we need is a picture of me pinning a medal on a black man. The firefighter – the one that saved the camp or something – Northridge… what’s his name?
Bruce: He’s Iraqi.

Officer Ryan: [talking on the phone] I wanna speak to your supervisor…
Shaniqua: I am my supervisor!
Officer Ryan: All right well, what’s your name?
Shaniqua: Shaniqua Johnson.
Officer Ryan: Shaniqua. Big fucking surprise that is!
Shaniqua: Oh!
[Shaniqua hangs up]

Anthony: Look around! You couldn’t find a whiter, safer or better lit part of this city. But this white woman sees two black guys, who look like UCLA students, strolling down the sidewalk and her reaction is blind fear. I mean, look at us! Are we dressed like gangbangers? Do we look threatening? No. Fact, if anybody should be scared, it’s us: the only two black faces surrounded by a sea of over-caffeinated white people, patrolled by the triggerhappy LAPD. So, why aren’t we scared?
Peter: Because we have guns?
Anthony: You could be right.

Who the hell talks like this? I have a grandmother who thinks it’s swell to plualize the African American community by calling them “the blacks,” and don’t think I haven’t been doing my part in taking every opportunity to let her know that just because she’s from a “different time,” a popular excuse we like to let our older generation off the hook for when we should all be concerned about evolving as a race, but people talking like this? I am amazed that a movie like this gets the atttention it did as I can’t see what we’re supposed to learn about the nature of racism by trying to understand these rather one dimensional caractures. I’m not trying to put this movie down but what I am trying to do is elevate the nature of film criticism beyond just hype and hyperbole and dust this movie off to see what kind of story, at its core, that’s being told.

To be honest, I don’t believe any of it.

Matt Dillion may be a racist at heart but what man would dare to verbally go on the offensive, pun intended, and make his venemous prejudices known to the world as casually as one would order a Carls Jr. with mayo? Heavy handed doesn’t begin to describe the way this movie comes across; a firm pimp hand across the maw of an all too willing audience comes close though.

One poster on the Fark.com message board summed up my feelings about CRASH succinctly when he said: “Talk about painting with a broad brush…Crash was painted with a crop duster. All that movie was missing was an Eskimo holding a harpoon. And apparently, Los Angeles is smaller than Mayberry.”

The damage is done and those with voting power have had their say. I shant rail any more about this but I did want to give a quick rundown of other observations I had about Oscar night:

-No matter what the popular press has to say Jon Stewart did a wonderful, solid job. F’ those who thought his joke about the Baldwins and Wilsons was mean. It was not only funny but it rang truer than any bell that rang that Sunday across our great nation.

-Will Ferrell. F-e-r-r-e-l-l. Hmm, I can’t seem to get a magazine to exploit my ability to twist the English language like a pretzel yet some obviously retarded yutz gets to keep his job after MISSPELLING Will’s name on the marquee when he and Steve Carrell presented. Shameful. I would’ve laughed had it happened with any other person.

-George Clooney. Brother man, send me a note, call me, do something to let me know you’re out there because he seems like a guy who you would just want to party with. Too many superlatives wouldn’t do justice to a guy who took A LOT of jokes on the chin with a smile (He, the smart one for realizing that they were jokes after all…) and made a nice, poigant message with his acceptance speech. It’s hard not to be jealous of a man who has it all together on the surface like that.

-The house band playing AT THE BEGINNING of an Oscar winner’s speech. This is just deplorable. A person works as hard as they do to bring a piece of art into our lives, some more than others but still, and they’re rewarded by having this pseudo wedding band playing ever so softly, ready to strike like a ninja hit squad as soon as their master gives the “kill” code, when their alloted time is up?

-I never thought I would ever write this in my lifetime but I had a ball laughing at the schoolgirl charm of Meryl Streep and Lily Tomlin. The two of them together proved to be well worth me not blazing through their banter with my TiVo remote at the ready. Next to Stewart, these two could’ve went all night as far as I was concerned.

-Three 6 Mafia. They proved why the whole room needed to loosen up. It was just great seeing someone up there being real, honest and, frankly, ready to burst open a bottle of Crystal right on stage. Good for them.

-Tom Hanks. Thank you, thank you, thank you for providing me with the “Huh?” moment that not a lot of people have mentioned. If there are some really good lip readers out there I would love a word by word analysis of what is coming out of Tom’s mouth. Some really good dish about the moment in question comes to us via Defamer.com who reported that Tom had some issue with regard to the music he was introduced with as he took the stage. First Mike Myers has an issue with having people poking fun at him, Heath didn’t seem amused by Kevin’s genial ribbing for BROKEBACK and now this. I don’t care what it was one was all about but I just can’t stop rewinding the footage while I try to figure out, from a scientific standpoint, whether he’s saying “fucking douchebag” or just “douchebag.”

-Pre-show interviews. I don’t know in what JC Penny Sunday circular advertisements the network dug up these plasticine models but I have never before felt as bad for a celebrity than I have as these Brite Smile representatives with mics asked, perhaps, the most innane questions ever devised. Was there no game plan? Was the idea to trap any celebrity caught in their tractor beam of sucktitude and make the experience just as awkward for me as they no doubt made it for them?

Oh, and before I let you kids loose today, I did want to give the winner of Stipp’s 2006 Oscar and Super Cage Match Challenge their prize: the shout-out for the week. Sherry managed to squeeze out three more picks than I did, doing it by mere Jedi random selection, and shamed me completely. I bow to her greatness. Congratulations. You’re teh awesome. Even though I can’t prove she cheated nor can I make fun of how I completely think she chose far inferior fare than I did I am considering adding a short answer/essay portion to the field of potential hopefulls for next year’s competition.


P.S.-An interesting thing happened when I went over to the Apple iTunes music store to purchase the single for “It’s Hard Out Here For A Pimp” (with Three 6 Mafia being the best advertising campaign since that Chuck Wagon dog food commercial I thought it was a no-brainer to get the tune). It seems that Apple has taken some of the best singles from the album off their a la carte menu for this digital selection. Not only did my comments (which are explicity solicited) removed, I guess their comments section is only reserved for those fellating the wonderment that is iTunes, regarding this matter I still feel like I should state this for the record: far be it from me to tell Apple what they can do with their digital sandbox I just think other people should be made aware of other places where people can get ALL OF their MP3 files at one .COM location without being jerked around like this.


LONESOME JIM (2005) Director:Steve Buscemi
Cast: Casey Affleck, Liv Tyler, Mary Kay Place, Seymour Cassel, Kevin Corrigan
Release: March 24, 2006
Synopsis: Casey Affleck plays Jim, a young man who, after deciding he can’t make it on his own, moves back to his hometown in Indiana — under his parents’ roof. He’s saved from his family’s dysfunction by a local woman and her son, who sees him as a father figure.
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Positive. I went to England once.

Saw a play there.

The play was called “This Is Our Youth” and it was written by Kenneth Lonergan, of YOU CAN COUNT ON ME fame. Matt Damon was supposed to be in it but he was “on holiday” or some such thing and was being replaced by some name I have yet to ever hear again. I thought about not seeing it but I was a fan of the flick and gave it a go. Casey Affleck was in it and it was, perhaps, the best part of the production. He was, without pole smoking his ego, marvelous. I liked him and have enjoyed his presence in other things since then. He has his own style and presentation and it’s nice to see he wants to have his own identity. When I saw the trailer for this, then, I felt that same rush of intrigue I had when I saw him ply his theatrical trade in London.

“He shot himself in the head”

The opening card that announces this is a new comedy from Steve Buscemi has the above line being uttered right before we know this. Casey’s dry, straight-forward speak is well-placed for what looks like, not a black comedy, but a quiet comedy. Liv Tyler plays, in what looks like, your average small town bumpkin who is outside the ken of Casey’s well-read universe. He’s not condescending but as he explains how Hemmingway did away with himself you feel that there is an imbalance in the parity between the two of them. As we walk deeper into the trailer you also get hipped to the knowledge that Casey looks like he is just drifting through his life.

The cinematography precisely reflects the grayness that seems to hover over his head; the danger in this, though, is you could end up with a protagonist who is so blue that the audience might start to wish he really does pull the trigger on his life, ending it all.

After admitting that he’s on the verge of a nervous breakdown to Liv, who really warms the climate in this trailer, Casey just absorbs the odd goings-on of his family. From his mother who seems to be cut from the cloth of every adoring mother character there is, to his strange uncle who seems equally cut from the crazy person bin of stock players there seems to be an honesty that just can’t be denied in here.

I am equally floored by how much I see hope in Casey’s frumpy, monotone persona. After telling a squad of diminutive, and equally downtrodden looking, girls that even though they are destined to lose their game but, “the past does not always predict the future.” Whoa, there, Neo, that’s a fistful of foreshadowing if I ever heard it. But, whatever, because the lilting guitars in the background, the modesty with which we’re pimped the number of film festivals the movie has played at and the ease with which this trailer makes its transitions is just commendable.

The ending is a little too cheeky for my taste, the young boy who helps to end things seems to be channeling the dark spirit of Jonathan Lipnicki circa JERRY MAGUIRE, and I really don’t care for Casey’s forced cancer-causing saccharine smile, but the pros far outweigh the cons and makes me really want to go out my way to see this movie.


ART SCHOOL CONFIDENTIAL (2006) Director: Terry Zwigoff
Cast: Max Minghella, Sophia Myles, Matt Keeslar, John Malkovich, Jim Broadbent, Anjelica Huston
Release: April 28, 2006
Synopsis: Based on a comic story in Dan Clowes’ Eightball, Art School Confidential follows Jerome (Minghella), an art student who dreams of becoming the greatest artist in the world. Arriving as a freshman at a prestigious East Coast art school filled with every artsy “type” there is, Jerome quickly discovers his affected style and arrogance won’t get him very far. When he sees that a clueless jock is attracting the glory rightfully due him, he hatches an all-or-nothing plan to hit it big in the art world and win the heart of the most beautiful girl in the school.
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Negative. Hmm, is this a comedy?

I wouldn’t know it by first trying to take in the initial moments of this trailer. When John Malkovich embodies the spirit of an artist who is trying to teach his class the ways of being one I think, initially, he’s being serious. When he tells his audience that he wants to see something he hasn’t already seen many times over I feel he’s getting at something pretty right on the mark: when you’re an artist and trying to create for the first time, be it through words, pictures or sculpture, you sometimes call upon the muse of unoriginality. Sure, to you it’s the first time you’ve drawn a woman’s fun bags, milk wagons, her hoo-ha, what have you, but unless you find the right angle to tackle the singular subject in front of you you’re just going to be white noise compared to everyone else who has been here and done that miserably.

I got all of this just by his opening remarks, true dat, but I got uneasy when the jaunty voiceover starts telling me all about this artiste university, how artisans can explore their creativity (as you see some dude putting the finishing touches, literally, on some ice cream sculpture) and you have one guy in an audience Q&A asking what advice one can give to someone just starting out to which is said, “That is such…a stupid question.”

The Tex Avery wolf jaw plunking down to the ground, that metallic sound clanging off-screen, is what happened at this point. So, I ask again, is this a comedy? I guess it is as the following images, one after another, keep getting more and more obnoxious.

What’s more about this abrupt change is that, in another scene, one guy has his wrists tied with rope with alligator clamps attached to his nipples, leading to a car battery. It’s funny, to be sure, but as soon as he asks someone to hit the juice, he starts screaming and we are jerked, violently, to a woman who is about to disrobe in order to be painted as an artists’ model. I think there could have been a better way to snap from one image to another but this was not the way to do it. The flow is awful.

To add even more mediocrity into the mix we have our protagonist trying to score with some of the art school chicks. This should have been one the best parts of this trailer as we explore all the “wacky and zany” oddballs we can all collectively imagine that inhabit art schools but it’s just executed with the kind of grace that’s usually just reserved for showboating, women’s Olympic snowboarding. To prove my point you have no less than two needle scratch sound effects being employed to get the point across that these ladies are well-beyond the normal purview of women who would, in real life, attend these kinds of schools.

I mean, I get it, wild and crazy chicks are funny to mock and to get a guffaw or two out of them but this is just lazy trailer creation. One of the girls, oddly enough, exemplifies the stereotypical Bettie Page Syndrome I made mention of a few weeks ago; these girls with the retro black hair and sharply cut bangs are always a good go-to for a quick laugh.

I expected more from the dude who brought me BAD SANTA and I feel a little let down. I am just hoping this was a matter of giving this movie to the wrong agency in making the trailer.


DUCK SEASON (2006) Director: Fernando Eimbcke
Cast: Enrique Arreola, Daniel Miranda, Diego Catano, Danny Pereat
Release: March 10th, 2006
Synopsis: Takes you into one particular Sunday morning in the lives of two fourteen-year old boys, Flama and Moko. With their neighbor Rita and pizza delivery boy Ulises, they create their own adventures to overcome their boredom. “Duck Season” explores the loneliness of childhood, the effects of divorce and the curious power of love and friendship.
View Trailer:
* Medium (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Mucho Posi-TiVo. I am a fan of memes.

Whether it’s finding out who might be in contention for viral video of the week, the bottle rocket kid shooting one out of his arse was a good one, or that the odd digital short I turned off prematurely one night while Saturday Night Live, Lazy Sunday (And thanks to SNL finding that people actually liked something they’ve done they’ve decided to try and beat the living piss out of these digital shorts by including them in damn near every episode since then. Great idea, peeps.), would have me so hooked after I played it a few half dozen times. The Chuck Norris meme of the moment is good but none of these are possible unless you have 13 year-old boys like these dudes here to pass it along to their cronies.

What I enjoy about this trailer, primarily, is the strength of its opening. I am always amazed that for as many times as I’ve done this there are dozens of new approaches to get things started. Here it’s the black and white static shot of a mother walking out of an apartment door and pushing the elevator door as two boys look on. The musical cue comes in, a funky 70’s ba-wanka beat, and the screen goes black. The boys cheer in delight as their adult overlord has unmanned their post for a while, they crack open the Coke, sit their asses down in front of the television and go to town playing Halo. The music is crackin’ and the frags are poppin.

The power cuts out.

The mood sours as things get silent. Like true boys, they languish in their unfortunate situation by just sitting there.

Things turn strange when a girl from next door stops by for reasons we’re not sure of nor are we sure why an odd pizza delivery guy makes himself at home; if I had money on it, though, I would say it would to be to kill the three of them but that’s just my experience talking.

The lives of these four people start to fuse together as they delight in doing the kinds of things that kids are known for doing: inciting indirect mayhem by just having too much time, and imagination, on their hands. The music that lilts behind the cut scenes of these people getting goofy fits perfectly; it’s fun, it’s jaunty and makes no sense. You get a cadre, a lot, of different award props. There seems to be a couple of dozen that fill up the screen but you get the point, and they are cheeky about doing it, that while this is a seemingly wistful movie you’re going to get something more.

I cannot explain why watching this trailer is so soothing and enjoyable but in an arena where loud and brash are the tools of the trade I give this trailer positive vibrations solely for setting a nice mood.

You’ve got a foreign langauage film, strike number 1, plus you’ve got a movie about kids, strike 2, and your sole goal with this trailer is to garner some interest without using too much of your native dialogue, strike 3. I don’t envy this marketing department at all because foreign flicks ARE a hard sell to us Americans. We like to think of ourselves as melting pots of humanity but we likes our entertainments en ingles thank you very much.

This trailer manages to overcome all of these things by not being afraid to make it all money shots, and it hurts to see the flicks that have to resort to that in their adverts, and present the movie as it is supposed to be seen. It’s one of those things where, as good or bad as the movie may be, you’ve got to admire their one shot to reach the American audience takes this form.

Carl Taylor: “Golf clap?”

James St. James: “Golf clap.”


CLICK (2006) Director: Frank Coraci
Cast: Adam Sandler, Kate Beckinsale, Christopher Walken
Release: June 23, 2006
Synopsis: CLICK focuses on a workaholic architect who finds a universal remote that allows him to fast-forward and rewind to different parts of his life. Complications arise when the remote starts to overrule his choices.
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Depends on how mainstream I’m feeling that week. Let’s have an open discussion, okay, a one-sided discussion with your delayed thoughts to follow later, about the place where Adam Sandler movies fit in the filmic landscape.

The knee-jerk response that he has a built-in audience won’t cut it for this argument and neither will that he has his own brand of humor that people seem to come out to watch in droves. I just can’t figure out what it is about his kinds of films just seem to exude. I am sure that the director of WEDDING CRASHERS, David Dobkin, who just got bounced from Sandler’s latest creation I NOW PRONOUNCE YOU CHUCK AND LARRY, could give us a clue but since all I have is the trailer for his upcoming movie I will just break it down thusly. Now, since every movie deserves to be judged fairly, I’ll be impartial and just stick to what’s on the screen.

“Do you ever feel there is not enough time”¦”

I wish I could say this movie spells doom from the start but the choice of running with Tears for Fears’ “Everybody Wants to Rule the World” as the sound bed to open this trailer is nice. I like the song and it somehow gets me in the mood for something safe, basic.

I’m not disappointed here as the sight of Kate Beckinsale walking her husband out of the house in the morning is a lot more un-common than it is real but it sets up the following scene of Adam being portrayed as a father who works too hard. The concept is as beaten and worn as anything else there is, David Hasselhoff not helping matters by being the prototypical boss who demands nothing less than obedience and hard work without regard to anything else. By David giving Adam this near-impossible assignment of coming up with something “great” over the 4th of July weekend you not only establish your characters’ motivation and problem but you have the added bonus of knowing, quickly, what the issue is at hand: he works too damn hard.

The effect is at once brilliant and yawn-inspiring. On the former, it’s brilliant because you manage to set things in motion quickly, not dwelling on stupid details that eat time and waste attention spans. On the latter, it’s lame because the premise is so cookie-cutter that it defies any kind of real sense of originality. In the subsequent scenes we are also led to believe he is so out of touch with his kids and their world by not being able to differentiate between any of the, da-da-da-dum, remote controls in the house. He’s turning on a ceiling fan, race cars, everything else but the television. He’s so wackily frustrated that he goes out to Bed, Bath & Beyond to get a universal remote; the store’s name is so prominently displayed that I am not sure there has ever been a product placement so boldly advertised in a trailer before. Kudos, trailer people.

Of course, this is when the crazy crap starts to happen. He hooks up with leader of the cow bells, Christopher Walken, and this is where I am sure hours and hours of time spent in a little writer’s room eventually led: Adam gets a remote that works on life. (Gasp!) I know, all you dopes who spent copious amounts of time in college to learn how to write are all wasting your time; no one can compete with these big league thinkers.

The application of this “remote” is prominently run though as we get Adam fast forwarding through fights with his old lady, which will no doubt get laughs from the ladies as well as the dudes who they subjugate; his boss, who he puts on pause so he can physically abuse and will earn the laughter from dudes who “so wish they could do that”; and the pause effect he applies to some woman wearing a tank top as she jogs, giving us all slo-mo boob floppin’ delight. The man is a genius. I want to dislike this trailer in so many ways but when, lo-and-behold, the remote breaks and he finds himself fast forwarding unwillingly through his life, his daughter quickly going through the stages in her life, I find myself being curious to know where things are leading.

I can’t figure out Sandler’s angle on most of his movies but I can see where he knows how to play the game of being able to reach multiple types of people with this movie. Good, bad or indifferent you can’t fault the guy for being a shrewd moviemaker.

Scrubs Blog: Week 17

Filed under: Production Blogs,Quickcasts,Scrubs Blog,Video — UncaScroogeMcD @ 2:48 pm
scrubsheader.jpg

VIDEO BLOG #36: “: “My Parking Lot Tour” ““
You asked for it, and here it is ““ the first in a series of tours around the Scrubs set, starting with the parking lot area found outside those familiar sliding doors.

17-scrubs-02.jpg

Download Scrubs Video Blog #36:

  • Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 81.57 MB)
  • Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 35.04 MB)

##

March 9, 2006

Ken P. D. Snyde-Cast #7

Filed under: Ken P.D. Snydecast — UncaScroogeMcD @ 9:44 pm

snydecast-header.png

snydecast-logo2.png

Adult Swim’s Dana Snyder and FRED’s Ken Plume set out to have a literate conversation between two pals, but inevitably devolve into a verbal, and funny, free-for-all full of bickering, infighting, and the special kind of male bonding that comes from conflict expressed through the podcast medium.

Actor/comedian/raconteur Dana Snyder, you’re certainly aware, is Aqua Teen Hunger Force’s Master Shake, Squidbillies‘ Granny, Minoriteam’s Dr. Wang, and The Venture Bros.‘ Alchemist. Available for weddings and bar mitzvahs (bat availability pending), you can keep tabs on him via his website, www.eyeofthesnyder.com.

Ken Plume is the editor-in-chief here at FRED. He is a friend of Dana’s, as well as his arch-nemesis.

VISIT THE SNYDECAST EXPERIENCE

linesm.gif

KEN P.D. SNYDECAST #7: Episode 7 – This week, Ken & Dana welcome special guest Jay Edwards, producer of Aqua Teen Hunger Force and writer/director of the independent monster flick Stomp Shout Scream. Speaking of screaming, even with a guest present, both Ken & Dana can’t seem to refrain from their tendency towards childish – yet utterly charming – bickering. Also, Ken wins the Prudhomme/Popper bet, though – of course – it’s contested by Dana..

[CONTENT WARNING]: This podcast may contain some foul language and horribly off-color jokes. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
Episode #7 (MP3 format)

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/snydecast/ken_p_d_snyde_cast-07.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

Got something to say? E-mail Dana & Ken at the Snydecast mailbag.

line.gif

CLICK HERE FOR THE SNYDECAST ARCHIVES

line.gif

##

March 3, 2006

Trailer Park: Innuendo

Filed under: Trailer Park — admin @ 8:50 pm

E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | By Christopher Stipp

March 3, 2006

Innuendo

One of the things that always keep me intersted in doing what I do here, and why I like movies in general, is that every single flick is an opportunity to see something new.

Never mind that what may be coming at you when you have date night is going to be a hellacious 90 minutes but what I want to focus on is how the real hard core geeks among us rely on information as a movie’s production rolls along. Case in point is the picture of SPIDER-MAN 3’s first real tease. What I dig, besides the obvious, is that something like this can stoke the flames of anticipation for your average movie-phile. You look at this picture and any fan of Rami’s first 2 installments starts to speculate about things. You begin to wonder if our man from SIDEWAYS will be a good enough Sandman or whether Topher Grace will be a good enough foil against Parker’s every-day personality.

It’s nice to deal in speculation and what-could-be’s if for no other reason than it gives fans the chance to build to the moment when that teaser trailer comes out. Kids start analyzing, people start prognosticating and, for people like me, it makes the whole conceit of “movie magic” a little more real as you find yourself counting down until you have the chance yourself to see if, in fact, those whole Venom/Mystery Villian rumors are true. As evidenced in great documentaries like RINGERS, STARWOIDS and even in TREKKIES you can see how getting caught in something like this can be a very enjoyable process.

Neverminding the small percentage of 12 year-olds with a propensity for filth, smack talk and a bad case of Grammatical Inconsistency in their sentence structure it is just nice to be able and feel like that what’s coming soon can really be something worth doting on for a while.

I think it is just the nature of watching as many trailers that I do that just reaffirms my belief that those who are down on the theater experience never really held it in much regard to begin with. Those who are purportedly putting a dent in theather attendence due to their feeling that waiting for the DVD of whatever movie in question is being discussed aren’t really the kind of customer who would watch a trailer or pour over news items and, as a result, be excited. The sites that exist for movie fans, like this one, speak to those who wouldn’t think twice about weighing the DVD window vs. going to the cineplex.

The reality, though, is that even though attendence is off across the board lately the marketplace needs to adapt to this changing enviornment. Moviemakers like Steven Soderbergh have given great ideas to alter the experience of watching films in the 2000’s but, at it’s core, those out there that deal in information, hard facts or innuendo will always ensure a healthy discourse of film will continue for decades to come.

By the way, for those wondering, that picture of Spidey is flippin’ sweet.


DAVE CHAPPELLE’S BLOCK PARTY (2006) Director: Michel Gondry
Cast: Dave Chappelle and Friends
Release: March 3, 2006
Synopsis: Dave Chappelle’s Block Party spotlights comedy superstar Dave Chappelle as he presents a Brooklyn neighborhood with its very own once-in-a-lifetime free block party. The unprecedented combination of comedy and music was shot on location. In addition to Mr. Chappelle performing all-new material, the stellar roster of artists includes Kanye West, Mos Def, Talib Kweli, Common, Dead Prez, Erykah Badu, Jill Scott, the Roots, Cody ChesnuTT, Big Daddy Kane, and – reunited for their first performance in over seven years – the Fugees. Academy Award-winning filmmaker Michel Gondry and his Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind cinematographer Ellen Kuras capture all of the exclusive performances and crowd excitement on an unforgettable Saturday afternoon and night, as well as (earlier in the week) private rehearsals footage and Mr. Chappelle in the small Ohio town he calls home. In Ohio, Mr. Chappelle wandered through town handing out golden tickets to invite several dozen citizens to join the party, providing transportation and lodging for their first-time-ever visit to Brooklyn. Ohio’s Central State University marching band made the trip and helped kick off the festivities at the intersection of Quincy and Downing Streets. As a diverse crowd comes together, Mr. Chappelle’s freestyle wit guides them (and us) through a day-long, life-affirming celebration of music and comedy, history and community. The lineup of performers is distinguished not only by the caliber of their music but also by the strength and power that their art draws from keeping their creativity pure.
View Trailer:
* Medium (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Positive With 10 lbs. Worth Of Crazy. Obfuscation.

Some of the things I took away from Dave Chappelle’s interview with Oprah a couple of weeks ago had nothing to do with me feeling enlightened by Dave’s actions in the past year but, rather, I took away the feeling that he either doesn’t know how to answer a direct question, wasn’t prepared to give answers to direct questions and that he is ill prepared to talk in an interview. Period.

“Why did you walk out on a $50 million dollar television show?”

Crickets might have well been playing an orchestral movement because Dave seemed lost.

One thing, though, which piqued my curiosity, was his concert film that he planned on releasing. Now, this is good. There is an energy that’s apparent as soon as this trailer opens up and I am delighted that Dave’s inability to communicate to other humans hasn’t interfered with his capacity to bring the funny. Also, with Michel Gondry helming the directorial duties you can be assured that it will be captured with the right amount of personality.

When the screen opens and you see two dudes who are residents of Dayton, Ohio, where Dave has made his home for quite some time, and explain that they don’t do a whole lot and one fine day Dave Chappelle, who is slightly off camera but gives these guys a couple of tickets to his concert, offers to take them away for the weekend. The manner in which Dave surrenders a couple of the tickets is a bit unsettling, it’s almost as if he’s trying to entreat them to get into his van to help move a couch, wink wink, but I get it.

Fast forward to Dave working the crowd, moments before the concert begins, and he’s on. He just knows how to flip that switch and get a group of people going. He lets fly a few Lil’ John “Whaaat?!”s and so, I take it, that it’s alright for him to appropriate his comedy when it suits him but when other people do it to him it sends him into a frenzy that can only be quieted with a trip to South Africa. Got it. Check.

The next few moments are just Dave armed with a bullhorn and traipsing through Brooklyn spouting off whatever comes to his mind. It’s honestly good stuff; his riffing here is on par with some of the best rehearsed material that’s being plied to audiences.

Then, we get the talent. Erykah Badu is all up in there, you’ve got the Roots ready to bring it and you even have the man who may or may not need Common to bitch slap him a few times on Lower Wacker in Chicago, Kanye West. The energy is bursting off the screen and you can feel that this is really something special.

2 things. One, when Mos Def, who has been exceptional in parlaying his music career into a filmic one, pops up, keep your ears open as the music is simply bumpin’ when you see the Fugees start working the crowd for themselves. Two, when Dave, shortly after this is talking to a pack of kids while holing a pool cue taunts these children to bring it for reals in a game of 8-ball and simultaneously slapping down a large bill. The kids’ expression alone is enough to say that while Dave may have some things to work out he can work a wide spectrum of age brackets.


FILM GEEK (2005) Director: James Westby
Cast: Melik Malkasian, Matt Morris, Tyler Gannon
Release: Coming soon to a festival near you…Peep the release date information as supplied by Herr Westby below…
Synopsis: FILM GEEK is a hilarious new comedy about Scotty Pelk, a socially inept video store clerk with an encyclopedic knowledge of film. He runs a website, scottysfilmpage.com, which receives zero traffic. He annoys his customers. He annoys his co-workers. And when he is inevitably fired from his video store job, Scotty finds refuge in Niko, a downtown hipster who teaches him a thing or two about love and life. But Niko’s smarmy ex-boyfriend Brandon won’t go away quietly. As Scotty’s first love turns to obsession, his life begins to change in profound ways.
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Solid. There’s this one guy, down the street, where I rent my videos. Yeah, I know about Netflix but I am slow when it comes to these kinds of things.

The guy always always asks me about the films I bring back when I check out more. It could be that I was renting SISTERHOOD OF THE TRAVELLING PANTS but he interjects with his own narrative about how he came to like or dislike the movie. It utterly fascinates me that I could be renting YOUNG EINSTEIN and this dude would lay it out as to how he felt about the movie. He amazes me. That’s why I think I responded so well to this trailer about a know-it-all video jockey.

Yes, the story of video clerks has been well-documented on celluloid in recent years and that’s why it puts a movie like this in the precarious position of having to prove that there is still something fresh to say about this genre, this segment of the population who do these jobs.

When we open up things a solid music track neither distracts nor overpowers what is happening on the screen. You’ve got some customer providing the comedic bait to our protagonist, she’s looking for a movie with the word “heaven” in it, and we’re launched into this rundown of movies by our man who rattles off all kinds of flicks that might fit the ladies’ query. It’s soft comedy but it is, nonetheless, viable.

The cards lay it all out for us. He annoys people, he’s going nowhere, etc”¦but the nice thing about the trailer is that expediency seems to be the thing on this trailer maker’s mind and that’s a great thing to see. The most common thing for someone who is doing this sort of thing on a shoestring is to really showcase the artists’ talent; trailers run in the opposite vein of that. You want your story to go in, go out and leave an impression. What you notice after we get a 1/3 of the way into this movie is that it’s doing just that.

Things do, however, take a strange turn when our clerk gets canned from the one job he, no doubt, can only do real well. His punting coincides with him meeting some girl who wants to bring him out of his nebbish shell. This is where I have an issue with the trailer. It seems awkward that we go from complete geek to all of a sudden having this strange new woman exposing him to a life which has completely passed him by. He looks strange in the role of a guy going to parties, drinking beer, schmoking a lil’ weed and I don’t know if I buy the rapid romance here. It’s forced or at least it feels like we’re rushing through something we shouldn’t be.

I warm up to it a little bit, though, when we see this guy surviving life beyond the video store as he makes his way through things other than always preparing for Tuesdays. The geek’s admission that he loves movies and that they let you be other people is poignant and that’s where the real emotional buy-in comes in for a movie like this.

I felt confused, at first, with trying to peg where we are going with this guy. Was he a hapless geek who deserved what he got, was this a movie about how he was never going to get what he wanted or was this about trying to establish something new when the one thing you’re good at is taken away? It is the latter and even though there are a few visual miscues that try and throw you off the mark in getting the right idea about this movie it is nonetheless a solid trailer for a movie that has a story worth following through to the end.

And those interested in knowing when, and if, this is coming close to you soon, Mr. Westby sent me this note:

Syracuse, NY
Palace Theatre
March 3, 2006

Orlando, FL
Downtown Media Arts Center
March 30 ““ April 9, 2006

Austin, TX
Alamo South Lamar
Opens May 1, 2006


NACHO LIBRE (2006) Director:Jared Hess
Cast: Jack Black, Ana de la Reguera, Héctor Jimenez, Richard Montoya, Peter Stormare
Release: June 2, 2006
Synopsis: Jack Black stars as Ignacio (friends call him Nacho), a Mexican priest who moonlights as a lucha libre wrestler to raise money for his orphanage in this comedy from the creators of NAPOLEON DYNAMITE and the writer and star of THE SCHOOL OF ROCK.
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: You’re on your own with this one. I don’t know what the hell is going on but I feel fine.

One of the strangest predicaments to be in, I would imagine, is to create something so good that not only have you managed to spark an entire legion of fanatics that like to mimic moments from your film whilst toiling away at their cubicle jobs but you’ve also had the secondary effect of helping to make Q3’s financials for Suburban-Mom-Mall-Approved Hot Topic some of the best they’ve ever been by pimping everything from shirts that still admonish me to Vote For Pedro to a bobble head that can sit quietly on my desk.

How do you possibly follow that up? With all the adulation that was heaped on NAPOLEON DYNAMITE you’ve thought that the bigger budget second movie Jared and Jerusha Hess would’ve blown their load, as it were, on something safe yet solid. They chose, obviously, to go with the latter and ditch the former because this is all sorts of out there.

I can’t, for the life of me, understand where the nexus of this movie came from or why Jack Black was the obvious choice when choosing who would make the best luchador in a movie that has all the flavor of NAPOLEON’s former self. Jack opens this bad boy in all his girthy glory. His un-Godliness is spoiled, however, when he does and ankle grab that treats us to a full moon that’s Neptunian in diameter. The pace is perfect, though, as the music, the same kind of windy pipes usually reserved for those South American scenes from CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER, makes me feel there is a fire fight about to occur. Jack is getting his vinyl jack boots laced up and is compressing his head into his mask when he explains the method to his madness.

Before I feel comfortable in the explanation given as to why this is all happening, I am yanked precipitously to the back story involving Jack hustling business using his ped-taxi, probably whisking people to and from the Dream Palace, Skin Cabaret or Wide World of Hymens, and coming upon the greatest luchador he’s ever seen.

His story is involved as his awe turns to work. He wants that attention, that adulation, and will do anything to achieve it. His Spanish accent is amusing, sure, and his nun friend who explains that unless his cause is for something righteous God will not bless him.

The angles here are all sorts of odd but, again, there seems to be a reason and direction so instead of being frustrated I am left feeling that, fine, be weird for weird’s sake but keep the information flowing, you know?

The next scene, though, throws me for a loop-da-loop when Jack is slo-mo running, pushing his anemic looking partner out of the way while taking in a dusty jog on a dirt path and then tossing a freshly snapped off bee hive at the same man. Wha huh?

Some scenes later, the golden luchador that inspired Jack into this business of wrangling and tangling steps out into a packed house and is greeted with fireworks and hot chicks at his side. The image, while strange, is common enough when you’ve grown up on the WWF. Jack’s theatrics to counter balance the golden child are birdlike and I can’t get a handle over whether he means business or is trying to also play up to a crowd that’s looking forward to seeing Jack get all sorts of schooled.

I am then treated to Jack ripping off his shirt, with an accompanying explanation about how he could do such a thing, displays his skills for a couple of dudes who look high on glue, and then I get not one but two butt shots of Jack; in one he gives me a full clench and, the other, a butt that’s tightly secured in red tights.

The rest of this trailer is filled with multiple shots of wrestling, of Jack’s partner looking to get his groove on with a rather unsavory chica, and there’s a sweet shot of Jack taking flight out of the ring, getting some wicked air, as he tries to land on his golden hero.

The ending, though, leaves me scratching my brain. He invites the woman who is, ostensibly, the female love interest in this movie to his room at the monastery, I guess he’s a monk too, to have a piece of toast. I guess it’s supposed to be funny and I think there’ll be some people who will say this is all sorts of humorous but I don’t understand. Is toast eating the new hotness or did I just miss that memo?

I’ll probably see this movie simply to see how the sophomore outing ultimately goes but, damn, don’t make me feel that I may regret my loyalty.


TALLADEGA NIGHTS: THE BALLAD OF RICKY BOBBY (2006) Director: Adam McKay
Cast: Amy Adams, Sacha Baron Cohen, Leslie Bibb, William Boyer, Gary Cole, Elvis Costello, Michael Clarke Duncan, Will Ferrell
Release: August 4, 2006
Synopsis: NASCAR stock car racing sensation Ricky Bobby (Will Ferrell) is a national hero because of his “win at all costs” approach. He and his loyal racing partner, childhood friend Cal Naughton Jr. (John C. Reilly), are a fearless duo — “Thunder” and “Lightning” by their fans for their ability to finish so many races in the #1 and #2 positions, with Cal always in second place. When flamboyant French Formula One driver Jean Girard (Sacha Baron Cohen) challenges “Thunder” and “Lightning” for the supremacy of NASCAR, Ricky Bobby must face his own demons and fight Girard for the right to be known as racing’s top driver.
View Trailer:
* Medium (Flash. I would’ve punted you to another site that has it but since I don’t like their player I’m not going to give them the shout-out. So there.)

Prognosis: Negative. No.

I thought this was going to be, in the parlance that my English teachers would no doubt flunk me for, a slam-dunk.

This trailer has challenged me to really sit down and meditate on the reasons why this movie appears, on the surface, to suffer from the wrong kind of angle sell. An angle sell, as I have coined, stamped and now dispersed in the annals of conversational currency, is a phrase I’ve come to realize means how a piece of advertising like this trailer, as a whole, is packaged. If you’ve got the wrong angle to begin with, usually resulting in a marketing department being confused with how to pimp a product to the masses, you’re going to start, proceed and end being way off the mark. Classic examples of movies being marketed all sorts of wrong litter the conversations of many directors who get upset when the promotions people have the end-all be-all decision power to tell the public what a movie ultimately is. Is it a drama, a comedy, a dramedy? What this all means, ultimately, is that figuring out the angle of a movie is like having a loaded gun with only one bullet in it: you’ve got to know where to shoot it and when.

The trailer for TALLADEGA NIGHTS suffers from a poor execution. This should be the movie that brings the crazy ass Will Ferrell back from the schlock (i.e. KICKING AND SCREAMING and his part in giving us the color infused pastiche pap of CURIOUS GEORGE) that helped finance his summer home in Monaco and back into the fold of comedic icons. This is the movie that should be what ANCHORMAN really wasn’t: funny. It should pop off the screen with Ferrell’s brand of giddiness but what we’re served is an opening sequence packed with promise with ZZ Top’s “La Grange” only to be let down with a crazy child to crazy adult transition that’s as amusing as the first CARS trailer.

The arena for NASCAR should be a hotbed of funny but, as we progress even further to setting up what this movie is about, getting a funny moment when we hear that Will’s kids in this movie are named Walker and Texas Ranger, respectively, the jokes are taking a long time to get out there.

That’s the problem, I think. The next sequence when Will and John C. Reilly go back and forth about couplings that go together, Chinese Food and pudding being rebuked for peanut butter and jelly when involving a lady, isn’t as good as it should be because you’re making me work too damn hard to get the joke. Oh, and look at the time, half of the trailer is gone, wasted. These jokes necessitate a set-up and the momentum for this movie pays the price.

And, when we finally come upon Sacha Baron Cohen’s character we’re given just enough time to see him, hear him utter a few words and he’s quickly forgotten. What the fu$%? Yeah, not many people really like the whole Ali G thing but I am a fan and, dammit, this is Will’s nemesis in this movie and I want something witty. No, I get Will driving with a cougar and Will signing a baby’s forehead. Yeah, the explosion of comedy just doesn’t relent.

I will say that the angle for how you market this thing is found when Will puts on a blindfold, ostensibly to do a little Jedi driving, whilst behind the wheel. The subsequent sequence of him careening into parked cars, straight out BEVERLY HILLS COP, and then veering off the road into a house is what every moment of this trailer should have been. It’s obnoxious, irreverent, wacky and the kind of thing that dudes want to see.

PLUS, and this is important, the moment of Will running around after a crash on the track and he’s in his underwear, spouting all sorts of nonsensical bullshit, even managing to drag Tom Cruise’s good name into it? THAT’S it. THAT’S the ethos of this movie and every other moment of this film’s trailer should have been just as irreverent.

As it is, I’m not really looking forward to this movie as I am just hopeful that someone will get it together and give me a better trailer. Booyakasha.

Scrubs Blog: Week 16

Filed under: Production Blogs,Quickcast Commentaries,Scrubs Blog — UncaScroogeMcD @ 2:22 pm
scrubsheader.jpg


BLOG-COMMENTARY #3: Episode 5×11 – “My Buddy’s Booty” –
Producer/Director Randall Winston and Writer Mark Stegmann enter the audio booth for another fun and frolicsome commentary. This time it’s episode 5×11, “My Buddy’s Booty” – just for you. And you know who “you” is. All you have to do is download the mp3 file below, cue up the episode on your TIVO, VHS, DVD, or computer, then hit play on the commentary. Hope you dig it – And let us know if you want more. Seriously. Write us a letter and tell us what you want.

16-scrubs-01.jpg

Download Blog-Commentary #3:


“THE TODD” BLOG #9: Todd’s Tips –
Yes, even “The Todd” ““ the omnisexual surgeon played by Robert Maschio ““ has been keeping a blog, and here’s his latest.

11-scrubs-061.jpg

READ The Todd Blog #9:

##

Scrubs: Todd Blog #9

Filed under: Production Blogs,Scrubs Blog — UncaScroogeMcD @ 2:17 pm
scrubsheader.jpg

New Tattoo Suggestions, Viagra and Etc.

The Todd is thinking about getting a new tattoo! Maybe a Tiger on my shoulder or a Mermaid on my crotch or a Shark on my chest. I’m open to suggestions. If you have an ideas for what kind of tattoo I should get and where I should put it, email me your suggestions!!!

I’ll pick the best idea and get it! New Tattoo Five!

Anyway.

I met a hottie nurse in the Urology department. It was classic Todd. There I was in the stirrups, getting swabbed with vinegar for my yearly test for STDs. As she was in the middle of handling me, I asked her out. Bang! She said no, because she was a lesbian and in a relationship. So I suggested the 3 of us get together sometime, since we all liked the same things, She politely declined. I understand. She did see me in all my glory and was probably intimidated by my prowess…

Speaking of which…

I have a friend. He likes to carry a little piece of Viagra in his front pants pocket at all times. He says it makes him feel “cocky.” You know, confident, self assured and ready to get busy with the ladies the moment the opportunity presents itself. Now the Todd doesn’t need any help in this department, but who am I to judge what another man wants to do to give himself an extra bit of umphhh…maybe the Todd will get a tattoo of a Viagra shaped blue pill on my arm to signify my virility!!! Virility Five!

That’s it for now…Todd Blog Five!

The Todd

toddblog-016.jpg

March 2, 2006

Ken P. D. Snyde-Cast #6

Filed under: Ken P.D. Snydecast — UncaScroogeMcD @ 9:50 pm

snydecast-header.png

snydecast-logo2.png

Adult Swim’s Dana Snyder and FRED’s Ken Plume set out to have a literate conversation between two pals, but inevitably devolve into a verbal, and funny, free-for-all full of bickering, infighting, and the special kind of male bonding that comes from conflict expressed through the podcast medium.

Actor/comedian/raconteur Dana Snyder, you’re certainly aware, is Aqua Teen Hunger Force’s Master Shake, Squidbillies‘ Granny, Minoriteam’s Dr. Wang, and The Venture Bros.‘ Alchemist. Available for weddings and bar mitzvahs (bat availability pending), you can keep tabs on him via his website, www.eyeofthesnyder.com.

Ken Plume is the editor-in-chief here at FRED. He is a friend of Dana’s, as well as his arch-nemesis.

VISIT THE SNYDECAST EXPERIENCE

linesm.gif

KEN P.D. SNYDECAST #6: Episode 6 – Ken & Dana make the futile gesture toward making this a shorter episode, in order to allow Dana to be a pirate-loving ubergeek and also prep for the arrival of Aqua Teen‘s Jay Edwards. But surprise, surprise, things degenerate ““ as they always seem to do ““ into an argument about something or another and answers to fan letters. Ken, as always, is exasperated and bitter, while Dana is a bit of an a**.

[CONTENT WARNING]: This podcast may contain some foul language and horribly off-color jokes. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
Episode #6 (MP3 format)

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/snydecast/ken_p_d_snyde_cast-06.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

Got something to say? E-mail Dana & Ken at the Snydecast mailbag.

line.gif

CLICK HERE FOR THE SNYDECAST ARCHIVES

line.gif

##

February 24, 2006

Trailer Park: AN ARM AND A LEG

Filed under: Interviews,Trailer Park — admin @ 8:48 pm

E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | By Christopher Stipp

February 24, 2006

AN ARM AND A LEG

Before we jump into this week’s article I had to preface my comments by throwing out a little trailer love for a strange, yet alluring, trailer for an animated movie. I was going to include it last week but my love for all things Roy Stalin/BETTER OFF DEAD got in the way.

It’s nice to see the kind of animation made famous by A-Ha for “Take On Me” make a surge back into the mainstream. Now, this movie most likely won’t be classified as mainstream but it got my attention and I am feeling in the sharing mood. The movie is called HIGH MOON and you can find the animated trailer right here. If you’re a fan of a hip soundtrack and a voiceover-less viewing experience I highly recommend just peeping out the trailer. Props go out to Pat V. for shooting me the link on this one.

I wish I had my planned column all ready for you, there have been some sweet trailers making their debut, but when I had the last minute opportunity to talk to Todd McFarlane about his involvement with David Fincher directing one of Brian Michael Bendis’ best works I had to drop what I was doing and find out what’s what. Sure, there have been other people to talk to Todd regarding this flick but since I wanted to talk movies and not action figures or trying to “scoop” when he planned on making a comeback into comics I think you’ll find this 1/2 hour I spent with him on the phone a little refreshing. So, I apologize there isn’t a slab of trailer goodness here but I wanted to give some of you closet comic nerds (present company included) a little pick-me-up. I hope you enjoy.

Now, on to the interview!

One of the most poignant transitions for any comic book fan that was hooked on Batman, X-Men or, in my case, G.I. Joe was that moment when superheroes just didn’t carry any emotional currency anymore. The moment when comics were just 15 minutes worth of reading that ended with some kind of Saturday Morning Serial cliffhanger and made the fan feel like they just pounded a fistful of colored panel Pixie Stix was the moment when that reader either waned in their interest for their fictional heroes or they felt empowered to seek out alternate reading.

Watchmen and The Preacher replaced the mustachioed evil villain tropes we all knew by heart; Alan Moore and Neil Gaiman replaced whatever half-penny fill in writer was continuing the further misadventures of whatever Spider-Man or X-Men spin-off was planned for that month; and, it was here that comic book readers became more aware that the medium they indulged in so delightfully, without much regard to resonant moments in their storytelling, was about to grow up. I grew up.

Many of those who still read comic books after long tenures of service, I am about to go on 20 years this May, know exactly what I am talking about here. There is room, no doubt about it, for all varieties of comic books.

One of the most poignant transitions for any comic book fan that was hooked on Batman, X-Men or, in my case, G.I. Joe was that moment when superheroes just didn’t carry any emotional currency anymore. The moment when comics were just 15 minutes worth of reading that ended with some kind of Saturday Morning Serial cliffhanger and made the fan feel like they just pounded a fistful of colored panel Pixie Stix was the moment when that reader either waned in their interest for their fictional heroes or they felt empowered to seek out alternate reading.

Watchmen and The Preacher replaced the mustachioed evil villain tropes we all knew by heart; Alan Moore and Neil Gaiman replaced whatever half-penny fill in writer was continuing the further misadventures of whatever Spider-Man or X-Men spin-off was planned for that month; and, it was here that comic book readers became more aware that the medium they indulged in so delightfully, without much regard to resonant moments in their storytelling, was about to grow up. I grew up.

Many of those who still read comic books after long tenures of service, I am about to go on 20 years this May, know exactly what I am talking about here. There is room, no doubt about it, for all varieties of books. Those who want their mind to traipse elsewhere can find what their minds are nagging at them to read by lingering long enough at their local comic shop. One of the things that made Brain Michael Bendis’ “Torso” stand in stark contrast to the books making Wizard’s Top Seller lists was its blend of true crime storytelling that infused Marc Andreyko’s art in such a way that commanded true attention. The story would prove it couldn’t be ignored and its eventual trip towards the big screen took a leap when Miramax decided to pick up the property. The problem was, though, the house that made its name on shaping original ideas a visual reality decided to sit atop the book and not do anything with it.

Enter, stage left, Todd McFarlane.

The man who originally helped Bendis get the book out to the masses, the man who thought moving it to Miramax was all but a done deal to breathe life into the graphic novel, found himself snatching back the property when Miramax eventually didn’t move on getting “Torso” jumpstarted. He has been all hips and elbows since then, pitching and selling the story, has landed the help of Bill Mechanic to come aboard to defibrillate talent to attach themselves to it and it’s paid off. With screenwriter Ehren Kruger (THE RING, JOHN CARTER OF MARS) ready to pen the adaptation and heavy hitter David Fincher (FIGHT CLUB, ZODIAC) anxious to add the stylistic element the book deserves to have preserved the movie has never seemed more poised for greatness. The reality of it, though, isn’t filled with as many superlatives as one would hope. Todd talks about the mountain ahead and how he plans on getting to the top of it with a movie that not only fans will like but will draw in an audience who never has to realize they’re watching a comic book unfolding before them.


The first real news I heard of this was that “Torso” was going to be made, Fincher is going to direct, Ehren Kruger is going to write it and I am wondering if there has been anything new to add since the announcement itself? One of the things”¦sometimes they put out those PR things slightly”¦prematurely. And what’s going on now is that we’re just making sure all the contracts are finalized. I was just talking to Bill Mechanic, one of the producers, and he was saying that his just got finalized and one of the other guys just got finalized. I think the PR people sometimes jump the gun”¦they do it for two reasons: one, they want to get it out and, two, sometimes it puts the studio into a pressure cooker; if they balk now, it’s already been announced, they don’t look good. So, sometimes it’s done as a negotiating tool. But, minus all of that, which is all inconsequential, arguably because most of the work had already been done when this announcement came out. Because, a lot of people announce things like this and then have another 8 months or year of negotiating contracts. We sort of did the leg work far in advance and most of the credit for that goes to Bill Mechanic. He used to run Fox.

He was blamed pretty heavily for FIGHT CLUB’s initial theatrical run.

Yeah, yeah. He was able to nurture a lot of relationships with some people and you start going on the producing side and you hope you can call some of those friends up, call a couple of markers up”¦He’s been talking about David for a long time. We’d gone and met with him before, trying to work through it, and I sort of thought that once he got behind ZODIAC that would end that conversation, but obviously Bill has been pushing that boulder up the hill and knew that the studio was only going to get excited if he got a couple of A-listers.

What grabbed Bill’s attention, initially? What was it that made Bill say, “I’ve got to get this made”?

For Bill, when we pitched it to him, the very first time, he sort of sees the same things I do. It’s sort of a no-brainer it seems like.

You’ve got a brand name in Elliot Ness as everyone knows who this guy is. You’ve got a quasi sequel, but not quite, and then you’ve got, arguably, historical data, which you can argue is America’s first serial killer, this is the case where the word serial killer comes from, so all the details that come with it, when you sort of do the pitch everybody just says, “Wow.” I mean it’s got a lot of Hollywood moments in it; they’re all factual. You can look them up in the microfiche. And, again, World War II breaks out and because all of a sudden there are, arguably, some political ties that get pushed underneath of all it, you just go, “Wow.”

To me, this is cooler than putting Capone away. At least I think it’s on the same par and, more importantly, sort of the first half of that story, the young kid turning into the knight in shining armor, is more consistent with what happens in the media today. We like to build our heroes up and then we like to deconstruct them. So this is the story of a man coming into town, literally the hero, and by the end of it all gets kicked out of the town. And, arguably, it’s still an open case. We deal in facts. If you go to Cleveland it’s still an open case. Elliot Ness’ version of events is that he solved it, if you believe him. He did his job yet he still got railroaded. They wanted him to change his job description and he goes, “That’s not what you hired me to do. I’m not a detective, that’s not what my job description is. But, okay, you want me to be a detective, fine. And, you want me to stop this guy, fine.” And, in his mind, he did both. Because the end result was hidden from the public they didn’t think he did either. He tried running for mayor and can’t even win that candidacy. Somebody runs into him at a bar in New Jersey at the end of his life and he’s almost penniless and destitute. And then he recounts his Al Capone days which results in this book called the “The Untouchables.”

So, we’ve only really seen half the Elliot Ness story. And the second half is just as cool, if not cooler. For us, Bill got it.

The trailer is”¦(BOOM) “Based on a true story” (BOOM) “America’s first serial killer” (BOOM) “From Elliot Ness” (BOOM) “Comes Tom Cruise” Or whatever. Whatever actor is in it. And you’ve got to ask how that trailer does not get people into seats? You go check, check, check. And then you add a director who has a reputation and it’s “You’re in!”

And I am sure there are thousand stories out there of people saying, “I don’t understand why don’t they want to make my movie?” Then it began to try and convince everybody to belly up and get it done.

And you’ve talked about who you thought you’d like to see, Leonardo DiCaprio, Matt Damon, who you’d like to see play this character”¦

Well, you know, historically, Elliot Ness is a lot younger than people think. He was in his early 20’s when he came to Chicago. By the time he put Capone away he was like 26, 27, he was a kid. You could say Kevin Costner was more of a Hollywood kind of thing, not quite exact casting. So, you could put someone in the role that’s in their mid 30’s and it’s historically correct which opens the door for a lot of actors.

One of the guys who Bill is quite fond of is Matt Damon. He’s the one he keeps saying, “That would be cool.” He’s at the right age, got those boyish looks, likable, all the traits that Elliot Ness had.

Once we get a viable script that the studio feels they can spend money on then we can go back into that equation and there might be more candidates at that point.

And so you’re still waiting for Ehren to finish his first draft?

Yeah, he’s going to have to sit there, go through his first draft and, hopefully, that’ll happen around the same time David has gone through his press junket, if you will, for ZODIAC and can catch his breath for a minute.

He’s got another movie in development”¦

Yeah, I have it right here”¦BENJAMIN BUTTON”¦

Yup. It might make sense for him to go from one kind of thriller, suspense movie, take a bit of a breather, and then come back in.

I am sure, depending on whatever the studio’s wants and needs are, and how fast Ehren can”¦at some point the studio could put the bum rush on but I hear that BUTTON is developing quite nicely so it’s not like it’s in development hell.

On the same token I know that Miramax, you were waiting a long time for them to do something with this and the rights came back up, how long have you been waiting to do something with this story?

You know, someone said the date and it was longer than I thought.

It’s one of those (laughts) things where you don’t see the sands of time going through”¦and all of a sudden you go, “How long has it been?” I think”¦I want to say”¦I bought the rights from Bendis and Andreyko almost seven years ago. It’s been that long. I would have to see when we sold it to Miramax as they sat on it for a while”¦and then we sold it to Bill”¦I mean it only feels like a few years.

Have you talked to Bendis at all about this? About having Mechanic on board, having Fincher on board”¦?

I haven’t talked to Brian recently. I do talk to Andreyko and Mark is, obviously, quite pickled. Because, at the very beginning, in earlier conversations, when I was talking to Brian about it he was saying, “We should just do a low budget one and we should write it ourselves and, Todd, you should direct it.” It’s true, you can do all that stuff, but, to me, there are way more qualified people that can come in there and do it, especially from a directorial point of view. It was like, “Thanks for the encouragement but you can sell this someplace, bigger than we’re talking about here.” And I know when we were taking our first couple of meetings Mark was saying that Brian is a fan of Fincher too.

I don’t think you’re going to get too many people that are going to sit there and bellyache if you get an A-list guy, in any capacity, to make a movie because that means you actually have a chance to put it in front of people, connecting, after all these years. I don’t think Mark or Brian are any different than anyone else and want to see their material on the big screen.

Exactly. And just thinking here about Alan Moore, who hasn’t really bellyached but has had issues with those involved with LEAGUE OF EXTRAORDINARY GENTLEMEN to bring it back to Mechanic and even V FOR VENDETTA which he wants his name completely removed from, is it important to have the guy who initially wrote it get excited over the making of their material?

I think so. When all is said and done Mark and Brian will be able to give their own personal view of it. Mark works in Hollywood, I know that Brian has sold a few things there but I think they are both savvy enough to understand that Hollywood is an inexact science and that once you let something go it may come out better or worse, very few times does it ever come out the way you want it. And that’s the kind of commentary you get from people who sell the source material. They go, “Oh my gosh, it turned out better than I hoped.” Or, “They killed it.” You rarely hear, “Ehh, it had some good spots.”

I think we understand that this has to be a character driven movie. It can’t be a slasher movie. We’ve seen those, it’s too easy. Hopefully when Ehren does his homework and, I’m guessing, will have long conversations with both Brian and Mark and sort of pick their brain and will go, “Oh. Got it, got it, got it.” He’ll be able to say to Bill, “Now I know how I can sort of get into this.” I always thought it could be in the deconstruction of that hero. Hopefully Ehren can get in there and write something that you go, “Oh, okay.”

As producers are you able to control any of that or can you only hope Ehren comes through?

I’m sort of in an awkward position and only insofar in that I sold it to Miramax and Paramount”¦I’m sort of looking over Ehren’s shoulder, offering words of advice. I’m not supposed to be doing that, for legal reasons, but not sound legal reasons. Big studios want something, they get conservative, they get conservative. So, my capacity is going to be more just making sure the production gets going, we’ve got the right people”¦

Has Fincher just signed on in name or has he talked about his own vision of what he’d like to do with the material?

I know that his initial contact with the material, he’s seen it, have you seen”¦

Yes. Loved it.

Yes, so did I. As co-owner of Image comics when I read it I was blown away by it. So, you can see the movie just playing out in your head as you’re reading it, right?

Right.

So, I think David had read it and the one thing he did say was that he sees this as being very stylistic. Now, maybe when he gets there, when we start the movie, maybe it doesn’t have the same commentary as it does in the beginning. When you look at that book and you see it in that sort of film noir look I think it’s some of that that’s intrigued him besides that it’s a hell of a story. You can see that it’s a great story and you can get a little stylistic with it. So, I know he was intrigued by the black and white part of it, I don’t know if he’ll continue to be intrigued by black and white but, all of a sudden, you see movies like SIN CITY and you go, “Okay.” You can do some quirky stuff to what extent? But, there have been other movies, like HISTORY OF VIOLENCE and ROAD TO PERDITION that, to me, fall into what this story is about.

Both of those stories were graphic novels but I don’t think your average moviegoer knew that. They were basically watching a glorified comic book. But what they did was take a medium, a genre, and they mixed it and they made it very seriously and it wasn’t about guys in tights running around doing flips.

And, even though there is violence in both of those movies, you can still get your wife or mom to see them because, “Oh, it’s Tom Hanks, Paul Newman is in it”¦” And they present it as a real movie. Same thing with HISTORY OF VIOLENCE. Viggo, you just saw him in his trilogy, this is him in a quiet role, and, again, it’s sort of intriguing given that, intellectually, there’s a lot of violence in it but you go, “Oh, what would I do in his position?” So, to me, my guess is this thing will fall close to that category except we have, hopefully, the added bonus of this also being based on facts. But, you get a star, and put him in there and have people say, “Oh, I like that guy.” And it just happens to be against a backdrop of some criminal case.

And I know you’ve been quoted as saying that you’ve become less enamored with the superhero genre. Is this just an evolution of your own sensibilities”¦

I know I find myself as I get older wanting to stray away from some of the conventional superhero stuff. It doesn’t mean you can’t look at any of the stories from the comic book world because here’s one example that you pulled out of the comic book market. The other two I just mentioned, again, there are plenty that don’t have guys in tights. As a matter of fact, maybe the marketing see that as a kind of a drawback.

I think that’s one of the problems with big movies that come from comic books. When you look at movies like ROAD TO PERDITION and HISTORY OF VIOLENCE, like you mentioned, the marketing seemed frozen, confused. I wondered for both of them if I was being sold an action movie, a thriller, a drama. Do you see that as a potential road block and, if you, what would you do to prevent that from happening?

In this case, I don’t think so.

What you’ve got here is a pre-built brand name. Once you say Elliot Ness, boom, a lot of people will go, “Oh, okay.” And then you go, “Well, what is he doing?” And you say that he’s got to catch America’s first serial killer. And, like I said, this is too easy of a trailer. This is an easy trailer to get people in but now the question is, “Can you keep them there for 2 hours?” That becomes an exercise for Ehren at that point.

I think that once you get a grip of what you’re going to do with the character, there’s too much there. And a skilled writer like Ehren he’ll find a spot, he’ll find a groove and it’s just a matter of finding what the studio wants out of it. They want more action, they want more character development, is this something they want to put out to get some Oscar attention”¦

Right.

Like those other two movie I mentioned, we can go down that path in terms of putting it out there, and if we get some nice visuals from David and get his whole crowd, it’s very wide, plus he has a large cult following, you could potentially have your cake and eat it too if all the pistons are firing on all cylinders.

Do you see this as the next evolution of comic book movies or do you think that people are getting tired of seeing guys in tights?

Naw, I don’t think so.

It just becomes a gentle reminder that if you’re looking for comic books you can come in with an open mind. There is some nice comedy out there, some nice drama and, obviously, there is action which is a mile high.

Do I think there will be any shift? No, not as long as the BATMAN’s, the SPIDER-MAN’s and X-MEN’s make as much money as they do and they are going to continue to mine all that. I’m just saying that once you get past the A guys, and you can count the A guys on two hands, then it becomes a matter of whether it’s better to look for stuff like Torso compared to the 25th most popular guy in DC comic books?

I laugh

So what’s the biggest step from here?

I mean, the big contract, on some level, is Ehren’s. Once his is done then he gets to write. I haven’t checked in yet so they may have finished him off already. The big credit goes to Bill Mechanic for sticking with it for as long as he did because he could have walked away from it. He had a couple of opportunities but he was like, “No, let’s keep going with it.”

I am really interested to see how this looks if it’s done right.

Yeah, done right I think it will blow a lot of people’s minds away going, “I had no idea that happened.” It’s what every executive said after we pitched it. There are big Hollywood, wild moments and you can go, “They’re making it up,” but no, this is how it went down.

It just got caught in a political wheel and it’s why it didn’t get exposed and, once we went to war, we got distracted. To show you how big it is, how big the story was at that time”¦that we somehow neglected in our history, Hitler mentioned it.

Really?

Yup.

In one of his speeches he used this case, one of his big propaganda speeches, he used it as the proof of the degradation of America’s society, The Mad Butcher, the Torso Killings. And then, a few days later, they find another torso in Cleveland and it has the word “Nazi” carved into it. I mean, it’s crazy stuff like that. If Hitler was aware of it you can imagine how big it was. And, somehow, we’ve lost it in the annals of our crime stories for some reason and hopefully this movie will put it back on the map.

And, really, for me, from a comic book point of view, it says to me that comic books are still a viable medium. If people are like, “I don’t want to see a movie of guys in tights,” then, you know, you don’t have to. As a matter of fact, if you don’t want to read about guys in tights, you don’t have to. All you have to do is spend 10 minutes in a comic book shop and you’d be amazed how wide a range of material is there.

You go into Blockbuster and you see the movies are all round and flat but it’s the subject matter that differentiates itself from kid material to our material, right?

Right.

And comic books are no different but, in this country, have such a stereotype of the word “comic book.”

It’s a stigma, really.

It is. Superman and Archie, that’s it. Really, go up to someone who has seen ROAD TO PERDITION and tell them that was from a graphic novel and they’ll stare at you blankly. They don’t know what to do with that. “I like comic book movies??” No, you like good material, that’s what you like, and that’s all I am saying. The comic book marketplace has a lot of good material and I hope it continues to have good material.

I agree. My first comic book was G.I. Joe number 47, that was almost 20 years ago this May, and even still I see the same variety of traditional comic readers; somehow that stigma is just not going away.

I did a book called Sam and Twitch that Bendis wrote and we got the new one, The Case Files of Sam and Twitch, and that’s all crime fiction stuff in comic book form. So, it’s like you don’t want to read Superman anymore, fine, there’s other stuff. You don’t have to stop reading comics, you just have to go out and find something that’s your taste now. There is plenty of that. The Vertigo lines are part of it, just make a little bit of an effort.

Hopefully this movie will help to chip away at that stereotype.

Yeah, I ran into a guy and I told him I make toys and he said, “Oh, for kids.” And I told him I do animation and he’s, “Oh, for kids.” Then it was that I did comic books and it was like, “Oh, you do kids stuff.” And I have to say, “Uhh”¦not really.” Animation can be anything you want it to be, toys are clay that you can put into any form you want. “What you’re doing is remembering YOUR childhood. You’re remembering your Leave it Beaver mindset. And you haven’t updated that mindset yet.” And I guess that’s our job, pushing that boulder up the hill.

Scrubs Blog: Week 15

Filed under: Production Blogs,Quickcasts,Scrubs Blog,Video — UncaScroogeMcD @ 2:10 pm
scrubsheader.jpg


“THE TODD” BLOG #7: “The Todd Explains” –
Yes, even “The Todd” ““ the omnisexual surgeon played by Robert Maschio ““ has been keeping a blog, and here’s his seventh. And if that isn’t enough, this week The Todd blogs via a pair of video features.

15-scrubs-01.jpg

Download The Todd Blog #7:

  • Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 7.03 MB)
  • Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 3.00 MB)


“THE TODD” BLOG #8: “The Todd Works Out” –
Here’s the second of The Todd’s video blogs for this week. Enjoy!

15-scrubs-02.jpg

Download The Todd Blog #8:

  • Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 8.25 MB)
  • Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 3.55 MB)

##

February 23, 2006

Ken P. D. Snyde-Cast #5

Filed under: Ken P.D. Snydecast — UncaScroogeMcD @ 9:53 pm

snydecast-header.png

snydecast-logo2.png

Adult Swim’s Dana Snyder and FRED’s Ken Plume set out to have a literate conversation between two pals, but inevitably devolve into a verbal, and funny, free-for-all full of bickering, infighting, and the special kind of male bonding that comes from conflict expressed through the podcast medium.

Actor/comedian/raconteur Dana Snyder, you’re certainly aware, is Aqua Teen Hunger Force’s Master Shake, Squidbillies‘ Granny, Minoriteam’s Dr. Wang, and The Venture Bros.‘ Alchemist. Available for weddings and bar mitzvahs (bat availability pending), you can keep tabs on him via his website, www.eyeofthesnyder.com.

Ken Plume is the editor-in-chief here at FRED. He is a friend of Dana’s, as well as his arch-nemesis.

VISIT THE SNYDECAST EXPERIENCE

linesm.gif

KEN P.D. SNYDECAST #5: Episode 5 – Ken & Dana argue the merits of classic sodas, talk up Toy Fair and bedbugs, and respond to a reader’s query as to who could kick who’s ass.

[CONTENT WARNING]: This podcast may contain some foul language and horribly off-color jokes. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
Episode #5 (MP3 format)

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/snydecast/ken_p_d_snyde_cast-05.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

Got something to say? E-mail Dana & Ken at the Snydecast mailbag.

line.gif

CLICK HERE FOR THE SNYDECAST ARCHIVES

line.gif

##

February 17, 2006

Scrubs Blog: Week 14

Filed under: Production Blogs,Quickcasts,Scrubs Blog,Video — UncaScroogeMcD @ 2:04 pm
scrubsheader.jpg


VIDEO BLOG #34: “: “My Olympic Gold Part 1″ ““
Scrubs may be taking a break while the Olympics take over NBC for a few weeks, but that doesn’t mean that the cast & crew are kicking back and watching figure skating. They’re still filming the rest of this season, plus a couple of Olympics-themed promos for the network. Keep an eye out for the judges in this promo”¦ From left to right ““ Melody D. was the left most judge (but was cut out), then Marta K. (our script supervisor), then John I. (the DP), next is Adrienne K. (Producer’s Asst.), then Michael Spiller (the director), and lastly Neil Flynn (the Janitor).

14-scrubs-01.jpg

Download Scrubs Video Blog #34:

  • Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 36.60 MB)
  • Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 15.94 MB)


VIDEO BLOG #35: “: “My Olympic Gold Part 2″ ““
More behind-the-scenes footage from the promo shoot”¦

14-scrubs-02.jpg

Download Scrubs Video Blog #35:

  • Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 17.17 MB)
  • Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 7.38 MB)

##

February 16, 2006

Ken P. D. Snyde-Cast #4

Filed under: Ken P.D. Snydecast — UncaScroogeMcD @ 9:56 pm

snydecast-header.png

snydecast-logo2.png

Adult Swim’s Dana Snyder and FRED’s Ken Plume set out to have a literate conversation between two pals, but inevitably devolve into a verbal, and funny, free-for-all full of bickering, infighting, and the special kind of male bonding that comes from conflict expressed through the podcast medium.

Actor/comedian/raconteur Dana Snyder, you’re certainly aware, is Aqua Teen Hunger Force’s Master Shake, Squidbillies‘ Granny, Minoriteam’s Dr. Wang, and The Venture Bros.‘ Alchemist. Available for weddings and bar mitzvahs (bat availability pending), you can keep tabs on him via his website, www.eyeofthesnyder.com.

Ken Plume is the editor-in-chief here at FRED. He is a friend of Dana’s, as well as his arch-nemesis.

VISIT THE SNYDECAST EXPERIENCE

linesm.gif

KEN P.D. SNYDECAST #4: Episode 4 – Ken & Dana tackle diet programs and the comparative weights of a blues traveler and a Cajun cook, while also reading some listener mail and having the podcast equivalent of a girly slap fight.

[CONTENT WARNING]: This podcast may contain some foul language and horribly off-color jokes. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
Episode #4 (MP3 format)

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/snydecast/ken_p_d_snyde_cast-04.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

Got something to say? E-mail Dana & Ken at the Snydecast mailbag.

line.gif

CLICK HERE FOR THE SNYDECAST ARCHIVES

line.gif

##

Trailer Park: COMEDY GOLD

Filed under: Trailer Park — admin @ 8:12 pm

E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | By Christopher Stipp

February 17, 2006

COMEDY GOLD

With the advent of CLERKS 2 coming out this summer I am reminded that even though I am keeping aged pace with the titular characters of the film I don’t feel like I am evolving out of the same flicks I liked so many years ago when movies like KRULL and STRANGE BREW were my RAGING BULL, my ANNIE HALL. I like that while I am able to be sharply critical of the movie advertisments you’ve all come here to enjoy I can feel all sorts of geeky when a car or person blows up real nice like in a trailer.

One of the things that have caused me to reasses where my barometer is set was my foray into the cinema last week to see CURIOUS GEORGE. Now, for those who are feeling any kind of nostalga towards this little monkey which seems so cute on ringer T’s that are sold at Hot Topic in your city’s mall I tell you that this is not an adult friendly animation experience and, I posit, the only experience to be had is one of hot, bordem pokers skewering your eyeballs as you try and figure out what Timothy Leary LSD disciple/executive authorized the obscene pastiches of color that are used throughout this movie.

Look, my girl liked the film. She’s 2 1/2 yet she kept her yammer shut and her butt in the chair. I was amazed by the supernatural power this movie had over her. She was laughing at the spots most of the other kids were laughing and even when the mayor for Cheeba Town, Jack Johnson, busted in with one of his lazy musical interludes my kid was jamming in her chair. Whatever subliminal message this movie was flickering I can’t help but give the thumbs up on any illicit activity that had this effect on my brood. What I have an issue with, then, is the Saturday Morning style in which this pathetically simple story was drawn and animated. Superfriends were better rendered than this movie and I can’t even give this movie a B grade when it was painfully obvious there was going to be zero opportunity for me to get involved with whatever the writers came up for the adults. I mean, just a couple of weeks ago I read one adventure to my little lady where George goes batshit inside a movie theather. I mean, that little simian gets into a world of troouble and not even the Man With The Yellow Hat can put the beat down on that meddling monkey; that’s the story I wanted to see: the one of the miscreant monkey who is always fucking things up for everyone else around him. This is a movie for kids and that’s fine. I am not going to take contention with that. I just realize that I have been spoiled by the efforts of other animators of over movies who had the foresight to know that there are going to be older people in the audience who like a good animated movie as well and that simply assuming kids are the only ones who would want to see a monkey get into trouble obviously have never seen me drool with delight any time that GOING APE or those gnarly Career Builder ads are on the television; primates will always be funny. I don’t care who tells you otherwise.

I think, in closing, I am glad that I still want to be involved in the movie going experience as an adult in seeing a kid’s movie. That I am angry I wasn’t let along for the ride in what could’ve been a great movie if the original vibe of the books stayed in tact is only just proof that not only to I demand for these movies to be better but the face that my dollars helped make this monkey movie take third place at the box office is just woeful and I do apologize to each and every one of you.


Also, and I think this is a good place for it, I wanted to state, for the record, that after watching COOL RUNNINGS over the weekend and being enthralled by the possibilities that is international competition and mutual admiration I would like to declare a fatwa against all that is Bode Miller Hype. After believing himself better than his teammates in the opening ceremony by not rocking that odd hybrid of beret, Kangol and touque on top of his melon spoke volumes about how he feels about the sanctity of sport in general. He can be all the asshole he wants but it delights me to no end that his poor showing in the one place where you have to bring your A game is some kind of cosmic karma that would not let someone so full of innane, self-righteous screed, saying that “I’ve straddled probably more times than most people have finished a slalom,” get away with being a “rebel” to those who could’ve been his supporters. I will say that he is an unbelievable ringer, a true personification, of Roy Stalin from the righteous and classic BETTER OFF DEAD. I hope you kids learned a good lesson about how much fun the media has in finding new ways to build up its heroes and to rip them down in true schadenfreude fashion. If I could admonish everyone, delicately, to send a picture to ol’ Bode (By the way, Nike, how is that marketing campaign going? Buy enough ad time? I’m sure a lot of you must be delighted with the way things turned out.) of Chad Hendrick who, even though he wasn’t a blowhard, was man enough to bawl like a little girl for all sorts of reasons, publicly, and still secure his Olympic gold in the face of those big, bad, burly commercials that show Bode in his slow-mo greatness; I am sure he could use the pick me up. Take a lesson from Chad, kids, and show a little class. It may not get you on 60 Minutes but I think you’ll see how much more rewarding and satisfying hard work, discipline and not seemimg like you having a boot planted sideways in one’s own balloon knot can be. Whoever thinks that brooding James Dean types are still a viable economic model for today’s youth need to have their collective…well, it is a viable model for many athletes and corporations who sponser children like this but it doesn’t mean that I can’t take solace in waiting till they get faced by dudes like Lane Meyer.


Aaaaaand, speaking of controversial media figures, if I could hype up next week’s column I would like to let you all know that this space will be filled next week with an interview I just conducted with Todd McFarlane wherein the groundwork for a filmic adaptation for Brian Michael Bendis’ “Torso” is laid out. With David Fincher being announced as the man who will filter the story of America’s first serial killer the possibilities of how one renders this tale are endless. Do be sure to come back next week as the information is plentiful. Oh, and some of you who visit other movie sites will notice that one of them ran a news tidbit about a crazy trailer that just popped up online. That movie is called SPECIAL and my critique of the oddity that is that trailer can be found right here. It’s nice to know that sometimes I’m finding these out-of-the way nuggets long before anyone else decides to let other people know about them. That trailer, though, IS odd but completely worth watching again and again.


Let’s see Bode get 6th place after getting his ass kicked by a mountain…


THE DEVIL AND DANIEL JOHNSTON (2005) Director:Jeff Feuerzeig
Cast: Louis Black, Bill Johnston, Daniel Johnston, Mabel Johnston, Jeff Tartakov
Release: March 31, 2006 (Limited)
Synopsis: Daniel Johnston, manic-depressive genius singer/songwriter/artist is revealed in this portrait of madness, creativity and love.
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Positive but with corrections. I think that one of the worst things you can do when pimping your product to a populace is shower too much praise on it; this only results in heightened expectations that fall short. Every time.

When I see a synopsis claim that uses the word “genius” to describe the subject that we’re about to watch I get instantly cynical and skeptical. I don’t care if this batshit crazy music man really IS a genius but I want to come up to my own conclusions about such things. Thankfully, the trailer never drops the G word and I am amazed that I am so drawn in by this movie’s substance.

On first glance this trailer immediately grabs me when we see our musical, filmic namesake standing on a stage, looking at a handheld camera as a throng of fans cheering in the background. The musical interlude that twinkles in the background as the screen flickers to a NAPOLEON DYNAMITE-esque hand-scribbled Sundance award proclamation along with words of praise from AIN’T IT COOL is endearing.

The archival video footage of Daniel Johnston from years ago, in his own voice, explaining who he is and allowing us to get a feel for this un-rock star is appropriate in a way that the modern footage that’s interlaced with it offers the audience a nice balance of offering something old with something new.

On top of getting information, quickly, about who this quirky songster is you also get a voiceover from someone who sounds well versed in musical comings and goings; it could be one of those twats that love to pour endlessly over old issues of Rolling Stone or NME and are proud as punch to think they are a part of a critical literati but it’s evenhanded. When you hear someone else, a woman, say that underneath all this talent there was something really really wrong with the guy you can sense that this is why the film got made in the first place.

This point is expounded upon as, ostensibly, those who knew him clue is in on the fact that not only was this dude tossed like a rainbow into a mental ward but that the doted on the devil much too much for his own good. Again, the sounds of those talking are laid out over a bed of fresh looking images. An abandoned, dilapidated nuthouse is used as background for Johnston’s audio diary of his time spent inside the kook clink. Shots of deliciously piled drugs from our nation’s pharmaceutical overlords give the idea that Daniel was somehow eventually treated for his psychoses.

The last moments of this trailer are spent showing the once rail thin Johnston about three times the man he used to be, perhaps a side effect of the medications, as his own music plays along images of his life as it is now. There are still people cheering for him, he still has that wily sense about him and his music seems just as poignant as it was over twenty years ago.

I don’t know a thing about him but yet, simply based on what I see here, I think I’d like to.


THE NOTORIOUS BETTIE PAGE(2005) Director:Mary Harron
Cast: Gretchen Mol, Lili Taylor, Jonathan M. Woodward, David Strathairn, Cara Seymour
Release: April 14, 2006 (Limited)
Synopsis: The story of Bettie Page, uber-successful 1950’s pin-up model, one of the first sex icons in America, and the target of a Senate investigation (based on her bondage photos).
View Trailer:
* Large (Quick Time)

Prognosis: Negative. Don’t you love seeing those faux hipster chicks who wear their hair like Bettie Page? They wear those same kind of era sunglasses, usually carry themselves with the kind of bitchiness that’s usually reserved for captains of the cheerleading team in high school and like to surround themselves with like-minded dweebs who feel that they’re all worse off living in the now instead of being really cool by emulating long dead iconoclasts? No? Maybe I’m the only one who loves seeing these kinds of ladies and making fun of them.

Off the bat, I love that this movie is rated R for “Nudity, sexual content and some language.” There needs to be more of these kinds of movies in circulation as the dearth of them only make it harder for young boys to come of age with the right kind of material laying around the Blockbuster. They’re sure not going to get it with all these actresses who want to go the tease route and I am even more pleased when the first barrage of images for this film is Bettie in all kinds of poses. They’re tame, to be sure, but you can’t just expect to have things get wild from the word go.

But, oddly enough, the trailer just explodes right into things with showcasing our talent young femme in color and black and white. I am not sure what’s more exotic or erotic but Bettie really isn’t shown to be so much of an innocent girl drawn into a world that was not her choosing but that being a pin-up was just her destiny.

The trailer starts off with her just getting her picture taken in gun boat bras and granny panties but things take a turn for the kink when a nebbish little man brings out these mammoth looking leather boots. I haven’t a clue if this is where her S&M phase starts or what but when a man off the street walks up to her and asks whether it makes her feel like punishing, crushing, humiliating, among other things to dudes when they gravel in front of her. The moment is perfectly rendered and I start to realize that Bettie wasn’t just some Playboy fantasy girl but that she was a full-on dominatrix who reached her subjects from beyond the page.

One of the things I fault this trailer for, though, is its simple omission of any substance here. Yeah, it’s great that we get this woman romping around in her skivvies for a full two minutes and that we get some real titillating video to watch but what about this woman’s private life? I have to assume she wasn’t all about her underwear and was so much more than the sum of her parts. I wouldn’t know any of that, though, because all I get is a little hesitation from Bettie about her fame being so constraining but I want to teased and pleased. This trailer, though, just leaves me blue in more ways than one.


BRICK (2006) Director: Rian Johnson
Cast: Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Lukas Haas, Nora Zehetner, Noah Segan, Noah Fleiss, Emilie de Ravin, Meagan Good
Release: March 24, 2006 (Limited)
Synopsis: Brendan Fry is a loner at his high school, someone who knows all the angles but has chosen to stay on the outside. When the girl he loves turns up dead, he plunges into the school’s social strata like a fist through a honeycomb to find the “who” and “why,” with the same single-minded devotion to his self-appointed task as the hard-boiled heroes of old.
View Trailer:
* Medium (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Pass. Originality of Vision.

This film was awarded a prize at the 2005 Sundance Film Festival for it’s originality of vision but does that mean it had a nice way of telling a story or that it just looked good on screen? I’m not sure what kind of an award an OOV really is but I can’t say that anything about this trailer really makes me want to find out for sure.

It opens up really wonderfully, though, when we get the R rated red banner that comes before everything. I am jazzed that, at the very least, there will be some wildly objectionable content to follow. I am quickly slowed down in my enthusiasm when we see our first player standing in a phone booth.

Now, why there happens to be a phone booth out in the middle of nowhere I don’t know but the little scroll of jive/slang that appears when our other player, the one on the other side of the phone, is hysterically rambling on about a “brick” and a “pin.” Ooo”¦I feel so in with the hip kids.

When I see that the crying girl on the phone was our Australian outback steakhouse fraulein from Lost: Emilie de Ravin. She seems to have gone missing following the exchange between our guy from the beginning but that’s quickly run over as we go back to our dude who brings in his buddies into this situation.

Our man starts to rattle off those code words again: brick, tug, pin. All the while these words are rattled off we get real smoky visuals of these words appearing and dissolving off the screen. I’m not really impressed as I am perturbed by these Sesame Street phonics lessons. I know they’re trying to be all sort of indie with the vibe and look but I’m not feeling very engaged with the material.

What starts to change my direction on this movie is the motion we gain by starting to show what all of this means within the context of the flick. The characters start interacting with other people, the mystery starts to grow deeper as discordant images piece themselves together.

Our hero gets his ass kicked by a Buddy Revell look-a-like in his high school’s parking lot. He, of course, gets to make a smoky cool joke about how he never saw that kid who beat him up before in his life and that he was glad he was looking for lunch money because he was”¦brown baggin’ it. Oh, SNAP! Did you fuc%&ing see that come back?? “Brown baggin’ it.”

Yeah, it’s edgy in that wink-wink sort of way. And the trailer doesn’t especially award you for paying attention to what’s happening as it does make you feel special just for watching what it has to offer in the sense of how cool it is trying to be; and it’s trying hard.

What’s odd is that I still want to see this movie however complex this story might be. There seems to be something between all of this and I can’t help but feel this flick rises ever so greater above the rest of the usual sludge.


ULTRAVIOLET (2006) Director: Kurt Wimmer
Cast: Milla Jovovich, Cameron Bright, William Fichtner
Release: March 3, 2006
Synopsis: Set in the late 21st century, a subculture of humans called Hemophages has emerged who have been genetically modified, giving them enhanced speed, incredible stamina and acute intelligence. To the government’s dismay, more and more of the population are being transformed, and they have set out to rid the world of this new subculture that they deem menaces to society. One rogue warrior is bent on protecting her race ““ and seeking revenge on those who changed her life forever. With fierce fighting skills and chameleon-like abilities, Violet (Jovovich) sets out to destroy a government-designed time bomb that will eliminate all Hemophages. To Violet’s surprise, the deadline device is a nine-year-old-boy, who was raised in a laboratory and goes by the name of Six (Bright).
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Can’t believe the hype…yet Do you know that there are only two movies I ever really came close to walking out on? I usually reserve the opportunity to see a movie as a chance to allow a filmmaker their chance to tell me a story all the way through. That’s why THE JERKY BOYS and THE FIFTH ELEMENT will always hold special places in my filmic heart as two of the worst films I had to ever endure. Milla Jovovich was only part of the problem in that movie but she’s kind of a one-note actress.

Case in point is the trailer for this movie.

Okay, so Milla is narrating this trailer. We open up with her kicking the crap out of some baddies who are wearing plastic scuba gear apparati, using the same kind of billy clubs made famous in DEMOLITION MAN. What’s amusing to me is that she’s trying to be this hardcore lady but when she finally stops kicking all these dudes asses for a moment and her gut is flopping up and down, she wants to break down the story from the beginning.

I don’t know what futuristic society set out to make super warriors who bear an un-original likeness to Nazi soldiers with samurai swords but it’s like a 13 year-old was given the chance to bring their comic book to life and they’ve included every old and busted archetype they’ve ever seen. AEON FLUX seems to have fused with the leftovers from THE 6TH DAY and those obnoxious shiny black bad guy uniforms from SPACEBALLS.

I’m not sure whose idea it was that this new futuristic world was so unkind to our lungs that people have to wear plugs in their noses which look about as serious as seeing them in the nostrils of Bob and Doug McKenzie from STRANGE BREW but it’s all downhill from this point forth.

We get more of our super soldier Nazi ninjas doing all they can to look as cool and dangerous as they can and Milla brings up the rear, or specifically, her rear in some retro Hypercolor pants and matching half-shirt. And let’s get this out of the way: she’s always wearing a half shirt. I so forgot to consult my military training from the future manual where it states that standard issue uniforms for the good guys are no longer are to be used for maximum protection but should, instead, incite chubbies from all men who dare gaze on her fleshy tummy. It’s mindless, stupid and completely doesn’t serve any logical purpose.

What’s more is the dreadful dialogue. When it is employed, Milla saying crap like “copy that” or “killing is what I do, it;’s what I’m good at” makes being an apologist for all the bad movies I still defend by the likes of Jean-Claude Van Damme so shaming; how can I stick up for those when I want to run screaming from this trailer? I don’t know but I am sure I’ll rationalize it somehow.

And, to be fair and balanced, I can’t dismiss this trailer completely out of hand. Even though the music is downright pedestrian I like some of the visuals employed. The effects work in some places is interesting and the handling of some of the battle sequences brings a fresh perspective on how a B movie can be properly executed if enough cheese is tossed at the screen.

I can’t wait until I ignore this movie completely when it’s released theatrically and then rent it when it explodes, or implodes, depending, on DVD. If it does bad enough at the box office I hope to see it being released on DVD within the month.

February 10, 2006

Trailer Park: 30 YEAR OLD VIRGIN

Filed under: Trailer Park — admin @ 8:11 pm


By Christopher Stipp

February 10, 2006

30 YEAR OLD VIRGIN

What a week it has been.

First of all, let’s give it up one more time for Chris Ryall and his tenure here at Movie Poop Shoot. I am quite fond of kicking the hell out of dead horses so let me be the 23rd person to say that I have nothing but respect and admiration for the man who gave me this part of the Internet to unleash the unholy terror that is the accumulation of 6 1/2 years of college level English to you, the teeming millions.

One of the very best things I can say about the man is that he was always available as an editor. I could always ask him a question, offer an idea that I had and he was unbelievably quick with the response. I have never known anyone to respond so swiftly with an email. He was already swamped, to be sure, with his higher paying job running this small little comic company in San Diego but for him to return an email that asked him his thoughts of whether the STAR WARS III trailer sorta sucked some ass and, regardless, would we be duped anyway to give up our collective cash to see the final installment Ryall was there to suffer this fool gladly every single day of the week. And I think that’s one thing I’ll miss about not having him around in his virtual form. It was the email that gave me the green light to stretch my boundaries a little bit and indulge in some interviewing that really changed things for me here.

Interviewing, for me, has been a wonderful addition to my abilities as a writer. One of the best things that I’ve learned about doing it is that the Entertainment Tonight style of star fu%&ing the subjects they’re talking to is not only sickening but it does the audience a disservice. I deeply enjoy finding the angle which will make my time with a person of a certain status unique; it’s a grueling process to get my notes aligned and in order to find that one question which will really get someone to open up but it’s satisfying as a writer to achieve that. Even though a few weeks ago my ambition to get the kind of subjects other movie sites enjoy as a standard sucked Chris into a situation he really didn’t enjoy being in he gave me the benefit of the doubt and did what he had to do. I think it’s important to let people know he did that for me and had to step up again after a director had some issues with some things I said about his movie. I was mortified he had to do these things but I think that’s how Chris rolls; he goes to bat for his crew, for better or worse. I would never do anything to betray what’s been given to me and Chris hopefully knows that.

He was the Eric ‘Otter’ Stratton to this ANIMAL HOUSE. I think he would be the one to take on any attack with the idea that only he could do that to his pledges. I don’t know when I’ll get my pin here at the ‘Shoot but I just hope to Christ I’m not the Kent ‘Flounder’ Dorfman character, the one that gets the beer tossed at the screen at the mere sight of my visage.

I want and need to thank Chris Ryall for all that he did for me in the past two years whilst here. The house will just feel a little more empty without his brand of humor.

Secondly. I’d like to publicly welcome the newest member of my own Southwest Syyyyiede Crew: Ella Grace Stipp. Coming in a full two weeks early and two pounds lighter than her sister I am happy to say that the only thing I have to do differently as a father is try and figure out A) how I am going to live in a house with nothing but women and B) how I am going to get the majority vote to be able and play BLACK HAWK DOWN in full surround sound whenever I damn well please. So, Ella, welcome to my world and know that I have this picture at my digital disposal. Vote right.

Aaaand, lastly, here’s a trailer that doesn’t really adhere to the filmic forum but is nonetheless quite entertaining to me as it prompted the question to the submitter: Which came first, Robotech or Transformers? I got a very interesting answer, one that really amazed me, and it makes me wonder how the live action TRANSFORMERS movie will turn out come next year. I do loves me some good space explosions though… ROBOTECH: THE SHADOW CHRONICLES


ON THE OUTS (2006) Director:Lori Silverbush, Michael Skolnik
Cast: Anny Mariano, Paola Mendoza, Judy Marte, Dominc Colón
Release: January 27, 2006
Synopsis: A dramatic narrative feature based upon the real stories of girls from the streets and juvenile jail, who lent their voices and unique stories to the filmmakers. These are girls who struggle with all the highs and lows of teenage life in an inner-city world that makes its own rules.
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Positive. My real, elapsed city time of what I spent in downtown Chicago proper? It comes out to 4 months. I spent one semester at a school that was successful for me, academically, but completely wrong when it came to defining my professional and artistic goals. The city is alive with pleasure but I can’t imagine what it must be like for some kids to be mainlining that electricity, that vibrancy, of a big metropolitan town.

“I ain’t come here to change your life”¦That’s a fact.”

I thought it was Don Cheadle who starts this thing out. It looks like a tinier Mean Joe Brown from LEAN ON ME but it’s a nice man in a collared shirt and a black, armless sweater.

One of the other things that you learn quickly, and this is where the props begin, is that this movie has been around. The NOMINATIONs, the OFFICIAL SELECTIONs this movie has been accorded is impressive for a movie that doesn’t sport a real noticeable “name.”

Our Cheadle-esque character is barking at a pack of girls who don’t look like debutantes and are obviously being yelled at because of whatever happened before this trailer began. The mix of a real nice slice of music and the delicate way this trailer delivers us to the first moment of this film’s core through its cutting is very well appreciated.

Also, what’s nice is that while there are a lot of quotes flying around, The Post, Newsday, Entertainment Weekly, the trailer doesn’t let it stop telling the story of why we’re here, trying to figure out if the flick is worth our time; the narratives of these women, these hardcore chicas, rolls right through the words.

I start to worry that this is going to stray into derivative territory as we discover these are women come from a pedigree of drug dealing, addiction and runaways. I have to believe that this territory has been treaded on before and that this has something new to say. The three ladies who are focused on are all shown in the middle of their lives of destruction.

When each one of them are tarried away to the clink I am pleased that things get more interesting with the advent of finding out, through our Cheadle stand-in, whether there can be a change in the ways people either change their life or become a statistic of recidivism.

As this trailer comes to a close, the real meat of this story obviously not being able to come in the form of a money shot, I think that this is the kind of movie that GET RICH OR DIE TRYIN’ should’ve been. You want to show the dangers of people, kids, getting involved with the kind of trades which put them behind bars and destroy lives but by putting some real looking faces on the issue without sweetening the story with bulletproof vests and ho’s you are doing the narrative a great service.


SILENT HILL (2006) Director:Christophe Gans
Cast: Radha Mitchell, Sean Bean, Laurie Holden, Deborah Kara Unger, Kim Coates, Tanya Allen, Jodelle Ferland
Release: April 21, 2006
Synopsis: SILENT HILL is based on the Konami game in which Rose (Mitchell) desperately searches for her lost daughter in the mysterious, terrifying town of Silent Hill, where they are trapped.
View Trailer:
* Medium (Windows Media)

Prognosis: Negative. Quick, name the most successful movie to have been adapted from a video game.

That sound of crickets chirping? Yeah, there haven’t been that many to speak of. Sure, you’ve got Milla Jovo-whatever who was serviceable in RESIDENT EVIL and even The Rock who was a part of an experiment gone awry, both cinematically and literally, have proven that movies which are first video games only have so much steam when you try and make an hour and a half of entertainment.

That said, then, this trailer looks like it’ll rise above, if only by a little bit, the common expectations which a flick like this engenders by its very nature of what it is: a not quite horror movie.

I will say, though, I was a bit bored by the initial offering of this trailer. It starts out all soft with a mother and daughter talking about the nature of sleep and dreams while walking down some pussy willow populated country hilltop. I know we’re going to get to the spooky real quick as these trailers only last so long but, come on, I see that we’re already a quarter of a way through this when the conceit that there’s something in the road in the middle of the night that causes mom and daughter to spin out of control. If there are any video geeks among us here today I ask of whether this is the way things begin in the game because I can’t see this being a real “explosive” beginning to things.

I get some jolly enjoyment, though, after we move through this little portion of the movie as when ma wakes up and discovers a) it’s now daylight b) her daughter is gone and c) the snow flakes that are falling aren’t snow flakes at all, and thus bringing back one of the most terrifying moments in SCHINDLER’S LIST, it is all about the errie. I don’t know how you would start out with this being the beginning of the trailer but now I’m engaged with things and this is what I should’ve been feeling about 30 seconds ago.

Now that we’ve established that this woman has a missing kid and is all alone in this desolate town called Silent Hill the interesting stuff is supposed to start, right? No, it doesn’t and I can’t imagine why a lot of people on the Internets are gushing over a trailer that takes me from mildly boring, to heightened delight and then plunges me into confusing cock-tease territory with a montage of clips that renders my man, Sean Bean, into one of those movie guys who are all sorts of bombastic in his quest to find this lost wife, neverminding the fact that if Silent Hill is supposed to be this podunk town which is essentially wiped out for some reason why do they still have functioning cell towers, and makes Radha Mitchell into one of those movie heroines who seem hysterical, not empowered.

Adding to this frustration is the false sense of horror this movie is trying to build to. I get that there is a girl who is slithering around this condemned town who looks exactly like the protagonist’s little lady but the effusiveness with which we keep this doppelganger’s visage out of view, almost like a GODZILLA-like shell game, doesn’t entice me as a viewer.

“To find your daughter you must face the darkness of Hell.”

The above quote just makes my eyes roll in the back of my zombiefied head. EVERYTHING in a horror movie is people talking about Hell this, Hell that and, to me, it’s just lazy storytelling. Yes, if you’ve got to work hard at something it feels like Hell but unless you’re making a movie adaptation of Dante’s “Inferno” you’ve got to come back to me later with something better than that as I would sooner give you a C- on your ability to create tension rather than relying on poor metaphors like this.


HORRORS OF WAR (2006) Director: Peter John Ross, John Whitney
Cast: Jon Osbeck, Joe Lorenzo, Daniel Alan Kiely, David Carroll, Chip Kocel, Kim Carey
Release: May 5, 2006
Synopsis: Feeling the pressure from Allied advance, Hitler unleashes his secret weapons. Throughout the European theatre of WWII, Lieutenant John Schmidt comes face to face with these “weapons” which terrorize U.S. soldiers fighting the Third Reich. The Office of Strategic Services (The O.S.S., precursor to the C.I.A.) initiates missions behind enemy lines to find the source of these weapons, a mysterious scientist by the name of Dr. Schaltur. Schmidt is joined by Captain Joe Russo and his group of war-hardened GIs who have experienced for themselves the all-too-real horrors of war in battle. Together, they must find the Dr. Schaltur and stop him before Hitler’s horrific vision can be fully realized.
View Trailer:
* Medium (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Positive. Now, one of the best things about finally being able to enjoy Kevin Smith’s Spiderman and Black Cat mini-series is that Dr. Josef Mengele is dropped in seamlessly in order to move the plot along to where it needs to go which brings me to this trailer: nothing says “wicked awesome” better than paring a WWII movie and Nazi zombies together in one film. Usually it’s one of the three which get my motor runnin’ but all three together is like a mutated pairing in heaven.

Also, what’s important to note, is that there’s no messing around here. We get right into things tout de suite without any background bull crap that usually hampers indie trailers.

Yeah, the exchange between two Allied soldiers who want to talk about “what they’ve seen” seems a little stiff but the quick cut to the all red screen with the visage of a zombified Nazi doesn’t even begin to explain the delight I felt when I see the white eyes of the undead cutting in and out of the screen as some other soldiers walk a night patrol. I don’t have any context to where we are or when this verbal exchange is happening but it’s just enough that we’re somewhere in the battle of WWII.

I also appreciate the effects work that is on display here. The shot of a plane with its wing on fire, the battle scenes of guns going off with bombs of smoke trying to create the realism of war, the cutaways of the mad scientist’s lab where these zombies are being created should impress even the most ardent stickler of details.

Sometimes the most tragic thing that a movie can do is to have its characters loaded with one-liners and dialogue so stiff it feels like a corpse but intermingled with the scenes of action, which should also be testament to the amount of work which was put into trying to mimic some kind of battlefield realism, but this is the exact kind of lot which should be delivering these kinds of lines. This is WWII, the era of pulp fiction, of Mickey Spillane and these army guys’ grandiose delivery is easily glossed over in order to try and understand why there is this Master Zombie which doesn’t look like he is so easily put down by ordinary machine gun fire.

As we come close to the end we should be pleasantly surprised that the trailer doesn’t follow the current trend in trailer construction which states that you blow your wad in explaining, and showing, everything that’s going to happen. The cards aren’t all on the table, as our narrative stops just as our men in green are going to after the last zombie in the line, “daddy” they call him, and it’s much appreciated as it leaves the audience with just enough questions about what is going on in this movie.

Kudos.


SPECIAL (2006) Director: Hal Haberman, Jeremy Passmore
Cast: Alexandra Holden, Jack Kehler, Andrew Leeds, Ian McConnel, Josh Peck, Michael Rapaport
Release: January 30, 2006 (Sundance)
Synopsis: LES FRANKEN (Michael Rapaport) leads a painfully unremarkable life as a metermaid until he enrolls in a drug study for an experimental anti-depressant. An unexpected side effect of the drug convinces Les he is developing special powers and must quit his job to answer his new calling in life… Superhero. A very select group of people in life are truly gifted. Special is a movie about everyone else.
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: I Have No Idea. Like to spark up a little? Having a hard time trying to use your “high time” effectively? I’d like to suggest you watch this trailer to truly put psychotropic drugs to good use.

I don’t know how to really put into words what we’ve got cooking here but it’s something I’ve never really tasted before and I like the way it hits the tongue, so to speak.

When we open up the trailer we see Michael Rapaport, really a likeable loser or annoying Brooklyn-ite who ought to learn how speak good, I choose the former, sitting in a stark doctor’s office as he holds a bottle of pills. He asks if they work, the doctor say they do and the next thing you know, and we see, he’s hovering in his family room as his bong load buddy looks on.

Now, the pills he took could possibly be inducing a state of insanity on our protagonist but the early 80’s synth music, popping and crunching in the background, and the static camera shot of Michael just floating as he tries to explain his condition to his roommates glazes everything with a funky craziness.

Not to be undone in his own apartment, Michael returns to his doctor’s office only to leap off his desk and hover above the ground on his chest. The doctor is confused, I’m confused but when he announces that being a superhero takes some adjustment time I am all on board.

Michael then appears at the local police station to tell the officer on duty that he stops crime and then takes off, like Batman fleeing the scene, only to run himself into the nearest brick wall. At first I don’t know what to even say about this but as Michael gets hit by a car, has his buddies shuttling him around town to ostensibly fight wrong do-ers and espouses a credo about not doing good being tantamount to doing evil I can’t help but feel either very impressed at the level of insanity or completely freaked out by where this story is going.

It doesn’t help matters any more that as this trailer progresses, Michael’s condition worsens and looks more and more beat-up.

There is a definite slide Michael’s character takes, as we get the idea that it DOES have something and everything to do with the medication he begins to take, and there is a certain amount of sadness to seeing him slowly burn out in a tailspin of psychosis and paranoia.

I can’t help but sit in awe and amazement as I try and get a handle with where exactly this movie’s story really is going but it’s too much fun to see Michael’s delusion of his own abilities get the best of him as he’s repeatedly thrashed and ass-kicked.

I promise you, though, once you watch this trailer you will have the musical bed that these visuals rest on popping for a very long time afterward.

Scrubs Blog: Week 13

Filed under: Production Blogs,Quickcast Commentaries,Quickcasts,Scrubs Blog,Video — UncaScroogeMcD @ 1:38 pm
scrubsheader.jpg


VIDEO BLOG #33: “: “My Contest Winners” ““
You sent in your answers, and we’ve got the winners. If you won, you’ll be contacted via e-mail shortly to get your shipping details. If you lost this go round, fret not ““ there will be another contest in the near future. Thanks to everyone who took time to participate ““ proving that Labcoats are the best fans out there (and by hook or by crook, I will get that appellation to stick)!

13-scrubs-01.jpg

Download Scrubs Video Blog #33:

  • Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 44.06 MB)
  • Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 19.10 MB)


BLOG-COMMENTARY #2: Episode 5×10 ““ “Her Story II” –
Writer Mike Schwartz shuffled down to the room with all the audio gear and recorded a commentary for episode 5×10, “Her Story II” ““ just for you. And you know who “you” is. All you have to do is download the mp3 file below, cue up the episode on your TIVO, VHS, DVD, or computer, then hit play on the commentary. Hope you dig it”¦ And let us know if you want more.

13-scrubs-02.jpg

Download Blog-Commentary #2:


“THE TODD” BLOG #6: “My Half Acre” –
Yes, even “The Todd” ““ the omnisexual surgeon played by Robert Maschio ““ has been keeping a blog, and here’s his sixth entry. The man ain’t right.

13-scrubs-03.jpg

READ The Todd Blog #6:

##

Scrubs: Todd Blog #6

Filed under: Production Blogs,Scrubs Blog — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:58 pm
scrubsheader.jpg

Sacred Heart Hospital

Awesome news! Nigel the Janitor and Ted the Lawyer are putting together an Air Band! Finally a chance for the Todd to be lead singer of a band! I always felt I should be lead singer of a band – I owe it to the ladies to stand up there and let them undress me with their eyes. Now they’ll get that chance. All I can say is: enjoy. Have at it. Go hog wild. That’s why I’m there. Who can blame you ladies? No one, that’s who…

It won’t be long “˜til we start performing, as long as my audition goes well. It’s just a formality really, who can sing and dance better than the Todd? I was meant for this.

Can’t touch this… I picked out one of my all time favorite songs to perform, “Everybody’s Working For the Weekend” and I even worked out a little dance routine to accompany it. I am going to “wow them.” Big time. Lead singer five! Air band five! Everybody’s Working for the weekend five!

Who rocks? The Todd rocks! Big time. Gotta go work on my song now, the audition is right when I get off work, so I want to be ready… stay tuned. And ladies hang tight because here comes the big dog.

Air Band Five!

The Todd

P.S.
I didn’t make the band. Bummer…maybe I’ll audition for American Idol instead, they know talent when they see it. Yeah, that’s it”¦ Paula, Simon, Randy here I come!!!

toddblog-015.jpg

February 9, 2006

Ken P. D. Snyde-Cast #3

Filed under: Ken P.D. Snydecast — UncaScroogeMcD @ 9:59 pm

snydecast-header.png

snydecast-logo2.png

Adult Swim’s Dana Snyder and FRED’s Ken Plume set out to have a literate conversation between two pals, but inevitably devolve into a verbal, and funny, free-for-all full of bickering, infighting, and the special kind of male bonding that comes from conflict expressed through the podcast medium.

Actor/comedian/raconteur Dana Snyder, you’re certainly aware, is Aqua Teen Hunger Force’s Master Shake, Squidbillies‘ Granny, Minoriteam’s Dr. Wang, and The Venture Bros.‘ Alchemist. Available for weddings and bar mitzvahs (bat availability pending), you can keep tabs on him via his website, www.eyeofthesnyder.com.

Ken Plume is the editor-in-chief here at FRED. He is a friend of Dana’s, as well as his arch-nemesis.

VISIT THE SNYDECAST EXPERIENCE

linesm.gif

KEN P.D. SNYDECAST #3: Episode 3 – What happens when two bickering podcasters finally lay their grubby little mitts on some decent microphones? You can hear what they’re saying in all its bitter, combative glory, that’s what! Author and humorist John Hodgman stops by to discuss Hobo matters, and Ken & Dana decide that idiots really should get eaten by bears.

[CONTENT WARNING]: This podcast may contain some foul language and horribly off-color jokes. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
Episode #3 (MP3 format)

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/snydecast/ken_p_d_snyde_cast-03.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

Got something to say? E-mail Dana & Ken at the Snydecast mailbag.

line.gif

CLICK HERE FOR THE SNYDECAST ARCHIVES

line.gif

##

February 3, 2006

Trailer Park: Zachary Levi

Filed under: Interviews,Trailer Park — admin @ 8:09 pm


By Christopher Stipp

February 3, 2006

ZACHARY LEVI: More than just a nice set of eyebrows

Absolutely nothing.

There was nothing particularly redeeming about the trailer for BIG MOMMA’S HOUSE 2 and I was afraid of what was to come when I saw Martin Lawrence shaking his chubby, fat suit groove thing all over the screen.

I thought that my relationship with the movie was going to be limited to a few wry comments about the preview, a little pole smoking of how Martin Lawrence is the Next Coming on Entertainment Tonight and a little faux funny-funny about the zany antics during shooting on Extra but when I was asked to speak with one of the movie’s stars, Zachary Levi, I had more than a few doubts of whether I should say yes.

Looking back on the decision many months ago to just throw a few handfulls of caution to the wind I am glad that I acquiesced to do it because instead of just focusing on Zach’s involvement with this movie, which did more than well in its first weekend of release and snagging the top spot by a healthy margin, I wanted to know not only what it was like to be in a big film like this but the itch I wanted to scratch was to ask about whether there was any stigma at all on working for a film called BIG MOMMA’S HOUSE 2.

Truth be told, I admire Zach for being so honest in being unassuming in realizing that to utter this film’s title does spark involuntary laughter but he also reveals that even though some may look down on taking work on a sequel there is a learning experience to be imbued by being open to the process. My initial apprehension was turned to understanding as Zach explains what it was like to make BMH 2 within the context of doing whatever it takes to advance his career to the next level. Where I thought there would be shame and derision Zach talked about opportunity and excitement just to be a man working within the Hollywood system. The more I talked and inquired about how he found his way though the film which would ultimately reign supreme at the box office the more I understood that this was more than just a movie that would come and go this was a flick that would help someone realize their dreams of making movies. Regardless of how you feel about the cash-in commercialization mentality of needless franchise pictures Zach has a got a story to tell and it’s all sorts of intersting and amusing. As point of fact, his next film project, SPIRAL is in post-production. Starring Amber Tambyln of Joan of Arcadia and the better than it sounds SISTERHOOD OF THE TRAVELING PANTS, written and directed by Joel Moore (aka That Skinny Guy from DODGEBALL and LAX) the movie will hopefully wash away any doubts of this guy’s ability as a bankable actor.

To start off a conversation with him I explained why someone from a place named Poop Shoot had the opportunity to chat him up and what I did, primarily, at the site: I review movie trailers.

Oh, right on.

Well, that didn’t help you any for this movie as I wasn’t in it.

That’s the thing. You weren’t in it but how big of a movie is this for you?

Well, basically what happened was that, the genesis of what happened, was that they wrote this movie with every intention of having Paul Giamatti come back and reprise his role from the first one. It was like he was his partner and he had a lot of screen time so they went to Paul and he pretty much said, “Uh, no, I did SIDEWAYS. Uh, have you not seen my body of work? CINDERELLA MAN? Hello?”

Paul didn’t need to do it, I don’t blame him, you’re playing second man to Martin Lawrence. So, he doesn’t do it but they still have the script and then what they do is rework it in all these different ways and they create this new, different partner who he hooks up with and that would be me. I am like one of four different FBI agents that comprise his partners, if you will. So, I kind of play his partner but I don’t have as big a role as Paul Giamatti but still a good size. Actually, a real good size but then I just did the DVD commentary with my director and producer, which was freakin’ awesome, because I was like, “Hell yeah I want to do a DVD commentary,” and I got to go in and do that only to find out that the good and the bad of it was that I have a lot of scenes on the DVD and a lot of them were deleted.

(Laughs)

I mean I will get a lot of screen time in the movie, which is good, but the director, and he’s given me a kind of heads up, who told me, “It’s got nothing to do with your performance, it has everything to do with trying to fit the continuity of your character’s relationship with Martin’s.” Like, there was one scene that doesn’t make a sense with me being a newbie, that was originally written for Paul Giamatti, that was taken out because it flat out didn’t make any sense with the kind of relationship I have with Martin in this movie. It made the deleted scenes but it didn’t make the movie.

So, I still get a good amount of screen time and I still am Martin’s partner throughout the film but I’ve just got a lot of deleted scenes which are going to be on the DVD. There’s up and downs to all of this, I guess.

Well, after all the rewrites, and then the decision that you were going to the comedic, white cracker foil to Martin’s character, how long was your actual set time on this film?

(Laughs)

You know what, I started this in April of last year, I started on the second day of shooting and I was there for the last day of shooting. But there were many days within that where I spent my time chillin’, mindin’ my own business, because we were in LA and all sorts of different locations. Overall, though, I probably was on set maybe half of all the filming days in total.

Really?

Well, a majority of the film we shot in New Orleans. It was like three weeks in LA and then we moved to New Orleans. We were there from like May 18th to July 11th so I was there in New Orleans for a while with a few weekend trips back to LA when I had a few days off because I wanted to get the fuck out of New Orleans.

Why? It seems like a place”¦

It’s interesting because if, like, I was married”¦people kept asking me, “How was New Orleans?” I mean if I was married it would be fantastic. I would have my wife with me, we would be hanging out, we would go check out some real good historical sights, blah blah blah, listen to some great music, and then we could go back to the hotel at the end of the night and we would get it on like Donkey Kong. But, when you’re a single dude and you’re in New Orleans it’s lonely, dark and weird.

I would figure it’s like Girls Gone Wild every minute of the day.

It is but I am really not that kind of guy. I would much rather just go out and check out the museums.

You know, if I was like 18 or in high school I would be, “Yeaaaaahhhhhhhh! Show me your boobs!” But after one night on Bourbon Street it’s like, “Ok. Now what?” You’ve got great museums there”¦or even swamp tours but you don’t want to be that one dude who is by himself on a swamp tour as everyone is looking over and just going, “Who the fuck is this guy?”

(Laughs)

And then the really bad scenario would be if they would then follow up with, “”¦Isn’t it that guy from ABC’s Less Than Perfect? Oh, what a loser.” I mean that’s what’s going in my mind. I was going around the French quarter a little bit, have a little food, and then went back to my hotel where I would watch the same informercials over and over again. INCLUDING”¦Girls Gone Wild.

The icing on the cake was when I spent my last night in New Orleans and I was in this room. I was in my hotel room and it was like midnight. And when you’re in your hotel room and there’s nothing to do you just sort of just flip through the TV and I just thought I would just go to bed. I turn off the TV, my head hits the pillow, as soon as I turn off the light I hit the pillow and I hear (simulates the sounds of a creaking bed). “Oh my God, yes, yes yes!”

So it’s like I’m laying there for an hour and half and I am just saying to myself, “My God…I just want to go to bed. Please let me go to bed, please let me go to bed.” And the dude just kept goin’ and goin’, seriously must have taken Viagra or something, and it was confirmed because when I finally went to sleep and woke up around 10:30 the next morning the dude and his lady were still moaning.

Besides figuring things out on a personal level, then, what did you take away, professionally, from making this film?

I honestly took away a lot from making this picture.

It was kind of the bane of my existence for a while because I am in this weird demographic where I have a lot of competition in my field. For example, when I go up for a role it is like, “Oh, we love this guy, but Ashton Kutcher is available.” Or even Dax Sheppard or Topher Grace or Tobey Maguire, whatever. So, it doesn’t even matter if you like these guys but even if they have one more film credit to their names than I have they are going to get the film. So, it’s tough to try and crack that egg or that thing that needs to be cracked.

So, by the time I auditioned for BIG MOMMA’S HOUSE I had already gone in for about a dozen or so films in a row and it was always the same thing: between me and the other guy, whoever the other guy was. And by that time I was getting a little bitter and jaded and so when my agent called and said, “I’ve got a script coming your way and I already know what you’re going to say”¦It’s BIG MOMMA’S HOUSE 2.” I was all, “Oh my God.” I mean I was already going up for a sequel, which people already look down on anyway, for whatever reason, so I am not only auditioning for a sequel, but I am running the risk of losing the job on a sequel. I did not need that confidence booster in my life.

So, I go in, and it’s those jobs that you don’t really think you’re gonna get that you really end up getting or the one’s that you that you think, “I fucking killed it,” that they say, “Eh, he sucks.” I went in, did my thing, and that day they called Endeavor and said, “This is our guy. We’re gonna call Fox and fight for him.” And I knew it was going to be a fight because we knew they wanted to cast someone from”¦Punk’d or whatever.

(Laughs)

It was that 13 year-old they really wanted.

(Laughs)

Oh, by the way, that was EXACTLY who they wanted to get to play my role.

Get the fuck”¦

No, that was one of the ideas they were kicking around. “Who’s that young kid on Punk’d?” I was like, “ARE YOU KIDDING ME? I’ve been acting my whole life and I’ve been on a sitcom, one, granted, no one watches, but you’re going to go and give it to some kid who makes fun of people on the red carpet?”

He was on Cribs, though.

EXACTLY! “He’s been on Cribs.” That’s what I need to do. I need to be on Cribs and my problem’s resolved.

So, they fight for me and I can’t thank my director and producer enough. They were just huge supporters of me the whole time and believed in me. And so, long story short, that’s one of the things I really walked away with. One of the greatest things about this experience was that I was able to grab dinner with my director and producer to just take in their history and their past and anything else they had to impart on me because they both really believed in me. They believe I have the potential to pop and pop in a really big way and I wanted to know, “Well, how should I go about doing this?” You can go back and see other actors who were in the same position as me and you want to know what kind of decisions they made.

And just watching Martin, being able to watch an actor who has done lots of television and movies, watching his subtleties and mannerisms was also helpful. The biggest thing I learned from Martin, a real eye-opening, movie star kind of thing, was that he has like 10 people around him at all times. He’s got this large entourage, and it’s not like they are hangers-on, either, but he’s got assistants and since he’s got this production company where you’re either in the movies your making or helping to produce there is that feeling that, “Shit, there is a lot happening with this guy.”

It was nice to have made my first movie with someone who is really the embodiment of what a movie star really is. It was humbling and grounding all at the same time. I mean, I had some idea but until you see it first hand it makes it a little more real.

And, despite what I said about it, on a personal level, it was nice to have seen New Orleans before it was changed forever. I mean a few months later I was at my producer’s house, having dinner, and this was right after the hurricane hit, and as the news shows started showing the devastation we were like, “Fuck, we were staying right there. We ate right there. We shopped right there. We shot some of the scenes right there in that park.” And then, to have some of the PA’s call me, the guys who worked on the film, to tell me, “Yeah man, I’m staying with a family I don’t even know, I’ve got no electricity, no running water, I’m washing my clothes in a dish on the side of the road, we’re barbequing whatever we can put on the grill.” And it was like, “Holy shit.” I was just having drinks with that guy just months before on Bourbon Street.

What’s left to be seen is if this film is a success in terms of whether it opens some doors for me as an actor and try to parlay it into some kind of acting career. And the whores. You can’t forget the whores that go along with it.

You’ll never catch me being too serious about this.

And that’s nice to hear because I did an interview with Robert Patrick and, walking into an interview, you never know what you’re going to get. I mean Robert had this black t-shirt on with these jeans and chain wallet. I wouldn’t have been able to tell that things were going to go as well as they did just on looks alone.

Oh, I know Robert. I’ve been to barbeques to his house and he’s one of the coolest dudes. He rides his motorcycle, his kids run around his house, his wife is totally awesome and he’s just this great guy who just happens to be an actor, a really good one, and does big films.

And I am telling you, no joke, our agent and managers we have are like the best in Hollywood like just the person who hooked you up with me. They are real people who really work hard and really kick ass who really care about their clients. That’s what makes the difference. I’ve talked to friends of mine, some of them are really successful, but are so miserable with their relationships with their manager and agents and that’s because they’re schmucks. They set these actors up with anything they can get. It doesn’t matter what the quality of the work is. “Yeah, I’ve got you going up for a vehicle starring you and Gary Coleman.”

(Laughs)

It’s like, “Uh, what? I don’t want to work with Gary Coleman.”

I’m sure if it was Todd Bridges”¦

Yeah! “Todd Bridges, maybe, but”¦” I know what you’re saying about Robert. He looks like he’s hardcore.

He looks like the kind of guy who would just completely get involved with a fight if he had to.

(Laughs)

It would be like, “Oh! Shit! Somebody is going to make the tabloids”¦”

Well, on the same token, how picky can you be when it comes to film roles or television work?

The thing about it is that you’ve got to have criteria. I have certain things that I do and do not choose to work on. But my criteria are more along the lines of, well, how I do put this, more along the lines of morals or values. Like, for example, a movie like [Removed]. This might come back to bite me in the ass.

No, I’ll take care of this.

But, like [Removed], I would never do it. I think that [Removed] is taking the lowest common denominator of film and doing whatever you can to give a 13 year-old a hard-on and going, “Here’s a movie! Oh, that’s entertainment!”

To me, it’s not my bag. If those guys want to do it, great. Although, on the same token, I would do BOOGIE NIGHTS. BOOGIE NIGHTS, to me, portrays things in a realistic context.

I’m not some crazy fanatic about stuff, like I enjoy some stupid comedy, but you’ve got to be responsible. There has to be some kind of accountability. I mean, clearly, I am not that picky, I just did BIG MOMMA’S HOUSE 2. Funny enough, I did read BIG MOMMA’S HOUSE 2 and I was really skeptical because I did not want to do a big piece of shit, I just didn’t want to do a really bad movie, but when I read it I did think it was funny. I mean I have read hundreds of scripts, you have no idea. But when I read BIG MOMMA’S HOUSE 2 it seemed like corny, family comedy but it did seem kind of funny.

And when I went to do the DVD commentary, which was weird because I hadn’t seen the whole movie put together, and so I was trying to watch it and talk about it at the same time. So, I’m silent every 10 seconds or so trying to watch it and then I would realize I wasn’t saying anything. “Oh yeah, uh, the funny thing about that, uh, scene is, uh”¦”

But, really, the film did what it needed to do. It’s a brand that stars Martin and it accomplished what it set out to accomplished. The first one made a few hundred million dollars and surprised everyone. If the promise of bringing out that same audience was there, and then some, it was like, “Let’s do this.”

On the subject of scripts, you’re on the other side of a screenwriter’s process. What can you tell is a consistent element of things you’ve read?

I don’t know if this will answer the question but I think this might. The one thing for me, from my perspective, that one of the things that I constantly run into, ever since I started in this Hollywood game, is that I kind of fall between the funny man and the leading man.

Like, I went on this audition a couple of months ago and I went in for the lead character and the feedback was, “We love him but he’s more the funny friend.” Right? So, I go in for that and they’re like, “Well, no, he’s kind of the leading guy but he’s the funny guy. So, I guess from my perspective, I wish there were more scripts where it wasn’t the stereotypical, “This is the leading man/straight man and this is his funny best friend.” I wish there was a more of a melding between the two and I think that Tom Hanks got lucky because he got a lot of those roles where he can be the funny guy/leading guy. And Jim Carrey gets those roles but I’m not Tom Hanks or Jim Carrey. They only write those things for the really big stars. I just want a vehicle, I just want an opportunity to audition for a movie where I can go after that kind of role without me worrying that they’re going to go, “Well, he’s the funny guy.” And it’s like, “Well, no. I’ve got a depressing side, I can bore the shit out of you, trust me. Let me do something.” But it seems like, normally, writers, and I’m guilty of this as well as I write too, want to go with a formula and the formula is a Will and Grace kind of thing. You’ve got your two leads and you’ve got your super funny supporting leads and everyone seems to fall in accordingly.

Does that answer your question?

Yes, it does. I just wonder if it’s like a dump truck that comes to your house and spills scripts all over the place.

You’d be surprised. After the holidays, my agency, they’re so on it, it’s pilot season and there is a lot of movies being cast and, literally, there will be one or two scripts on my doorstep. It’s just a busy time of year. And when it’s not busy, then, of course there is nothing to do and I just sit in my bedroom and cry.

I mean in the six years I have been with my agency I have read so many scripts that I will sometimes go to the movies and it’s depressing because you know the story already. I remember one time I was excited and I was sitting there and then I said, “Wait a minute. I know what happens. I won’t get the full experience of not knowing what’s coming next.” But, really, when I do see something like that I hope that it has been long enough that I have forgotten what it’s all about.

Is it nice to know that you’ve got some good, steady, television work?

I’ll tell you, it has been a real blessing. I’ve gotten to know from living in a small studio and living on unemployment and having a car that”¦I had this Integra, this little used Integra that I was driving around from Ventura, California to LA, about an hour’s drive, and just from commuting the transmission went out twice. And it’s like 2 grand to get your transmission fixed. I didn’t have it. I was busing tables just to make ends meet and I needed a car to get to and from LA. And Mitsubishi had this thing around 2001 where it was like 0 down, 0 payments, 0 interest for a year and I booked two pilots the season before that and I was like, “I really believe I can book another pilot and pay this thing off.” Or most of it, anyway. So, I went down to Mitsubishi and I signed my first born away and I was like, “I need you to give me this car for free. Aaaaaand…joke’s on you if I don’t have any money.”

So, I literally got this Montero Sport and I am driving it, a car that I owe like 30 grand on, that I don’t have a cent for, I’m living in this studio and on unemployment, and then I go and try out for Less Than Perfect and I get it. I’m being a little more wise, though, this time around because the after the first couple of pilots when I got this big chunk of money I was like, “Waaaa!!! Yeow! I’m taking everyone out to dinner”¦” Because, when you’re 18, it’s like, “Yeah, who’s the baller?” And I blew through that money really fast so when I got my third pilot which was Less Than Perfect I was all about thinking, “Let’s just calm down a second. Let’s see what happens with this one.”

So, Less Than Perfect gets picked up, we shoot a couple more episodes, I’m sure the people at people at Mitsubishi were really disappointed they were not going to be making any money off the sale because I literally whipped out the checkbook and said, “So, what is it that I owe you on this? 28,500? There you go”¦” And they’re all looking at me saying, “Who the fuck is this kid who couldn’t afford it a few months ago and is now paying it off in one check?”

It’s been a huge blessing that it has gone for four years, it’s just unheard of. I mean, ABC just had Emily’s Reasons Why Not. Cancelled. One episode. One episode!

This is the crazy irony of it: everywhere you go in LA there are these billboards and bus stops and it was all over the place! And they went one episode. The ratings were so horrible that they had to yank it after one episode? Huge star. Less Than Perfect? We have jaaaaaack shhiiit for publicity. I mean it was pretty good to start but, near the end, it was like, “So, watch a brand new According to Jim, a brand new this,” and they would show a little clip of each show, but by the end it was like the fast talking Micro Machines guy, “anddon’tforgetLessThanPerfect.” You would’ve thought someone was sneezing at the end of the promo, that’s how fast it was.

It’s one of those things as an actor, or really anyone in this business, when you kind of get to a place where you don’t have any control over it anymore you’ve got to really just say, “Ah, fuck it. Whatever.”

But, you know, I am not working in a coal mine getting buried and killed so this is just an actor venting and I feel blessed for what I’ve got and these problems are all relative.

Scrubs Blog: Week 12

Filed under: Production Blogs,Quickcasts,Scrubs Blog,Video — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:51 pm
scrubsheader.jpg


VIDEO BLOG #32: “: “My Trivia” ““
Everyone’s off this week, but that doesn’t mean the crew doesn’t have something special for you. In fact, they’ve devised a trivia contest! That’s right ““ just watch this week’s blog, then be one of the first three (3) fans to write in with the correct answers, and the producers will send you an extra special Scrubs prize pack! (And just to clarify ““ in the question asking about themes that Ted’s band has sung, they mean song styles ““ not actual song titles) The contest deadline is this Sunday (2/5/2006) at midnight EST. The winning entries will be notified, at which time we’ll get your mailing addresses for the prize packs. Good luck, and may the most ardent labcoats (my new term for Scrubs fans, natch) win!! CONTEST IS CLOSED.

12-scrubs-01.jpg

Download Scrubs Video Blog #32:

  • Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 12.49 MB)
  • Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 5.30 MB)

##

February 2, 2006

Ken P. D. Snyde-Cast #2

Filed under: Ken P.D. Snydecast — UncaScroogeMcD @ 10:02 pm

snydecast-header.png

snydecast-logo2.png

Adult Swim’s Dana Snyder and FRED’s Ken Plume set out to have a literate conversation between two pals, but inevitably devolve into a verbal, and funny, free-for-all full of bickering, infighting, and the special kind of male bonding that comes from conflict expressed through the podcast medium.

Actor/comedian/raconteur Dana Snyder, you’re certainly aware, is Aqua Teen Hunger Force’s Master Shake, Squidbillies‘ Granny, Minoriteam’s Dr. Wang, and The Venture Bros.‘ Alchemist. Available for weddings and bar mitzvahs (bat availability pending), you can keep tabs on him via his website, www.eyeofthesnyder.com.

Ken Plume is the editor-in-chief here at FRED. He is a friend of Dana’s, as well as his arch-nemesis.

VISIT THE SNYDECAST EXPERIENCE

linesm.gif

KEN P.D. SNYDECAST #2: Episode 2 – Gluttons for punishment, Ken & Dana return for more podcastery banter…

[CONTENT WARNING]: This podcast may contain some foul language and horribly off-color jokes. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
Episode #2 (MP3 format)

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/snydecast/ken_p_d_snyde_cast-02.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

Got something to say? E-mail Dana & Ken at the Snydecast mailbag.

line.gif

CLICK HERE FOR THE SNYDECAST ARCHIVES

line.gif

##

January 27, 2006

Trailer Park: RESPEC’

Filed under: Trailer Park — admin @ 8:07 pm


By Christopher Stipp

January 27, 2006

RESPEC’

A letter came across my virtual desk last week and I think it’s worthy enough for me to not ponder the mindless ramblings of my own choosing from last week’s reviews but to give this space up to a reader who had some thoughts of their own regarding my comments about FLIGHT 93. I think it’s appropriate to have a little talk/counter-talk time and share something with the class. Lest you believe that it’s all about people showering praise on my pithy prose here is someone who has some interesting things to say to the contrary:

I’ll be honest, I’ve been with you for a long time, seriously. I started reading Moviepoopshoot on a daily basis, sadly enough, back when it first turned from a gimmick ad into an actual entertainment site. I’ve been reading your bit since it started. And I had considered Trailer Park to be one of the most entertaining parts of the whole thing. And then this:

“True story: there was a Muslim mosque that just built and opened last year in my neighborhood. Now, if you are accustomed to this then it ain’t nothin’ but a thang but a chicken wing. For me, though, it’s a little different. This is only the second one I’ve ever consciously seen in my life. Every time I drive by it and see those praying inside, on their knees, I can’t help but think about Iraq and 9/11 without fail, every time I do it.”

I know what you were going for. Playing the honesty card, you’re trying to be so understandable and all of that. Your chicken wing quote is meant to indicate that you are joking, and who wouldn’t laugh, right? But, I mean, come on. Judging from what you say here, I’ve seen one less mosque than you have, in my life, and I still don’t think about Iraq and 9/11 without fail, every time I see it. Why would I? It’s 2006. It’s not that tough to think things through.

So you don’t like the Flight 93 trailer. Neither do I, but I just think it’s a boring trailer and it’s a movie that doesn’t need to be made. You have this weird non-agenda where I don’t think you even understand why the mosque makes you nervous. I don’t get it.

Fair enough assessment.

I didn’t know quite how to respond to this, at first I thought she may be right; I think that about everything that comes into opposition to what I’ve said because I never want to be someone who assumes that their own point-of-view is the right one and I did want to be fair while accepting this reader’s opinion. So, what follows, then, is an explanation of what exactly I was trying to get at in my initial review of the trailer:

First, thanks for your message.

The only way that Poop Shoot will rise above the normal chatter of other movie sites dedicated to frothing about the newest studio-sponsored here-today-gone-tomorrow project is if we’re willing to be honest with our audience and allow for the free flow of opinions, especially mine and yours.

Now, that said, I’ve hit some nerve with you regarding my comments on what started out to be a critique of a so-so trailer for Greengrass’ latest regarding a new Muslim mosque in my neighborhood.

“You have this weird non-agenda where I don’t think you even understand why the mosque makes you nervous. I don’t get it.”

You’re absolutely right. I don’t get it either. I don’t understand it. I don’t know why I think about Iraq and 9/11 but I do. There isn’t any weird agenda going on, I assure you, as to have an agenda would necessitate I posit some opinion regarding the issue at hand. If you made it far enough down the list of reviews this week I also included a shout-out for WHY WE FIGHT and directed people to PBS’ excellent coverage of the upside-down situation over in Iraq.

I think while I have sufficiently deflected any idea and propaganda that war is great and we’re doing a splendid job in Iraq taking care of business I also think that there is something to be said for how people feel, on an individual basis, regarding everything that’s happened in the past 5 years.

I admit it completely; I grew up in some of the whitest neighborhoods ever constructed by Anglos all across America. Starting with Kansas, Illinois and now Arizona I have been thoroughly shut-off with people who are different than I am. Geographically speaking, Catholic and Lutheran and Mormon, with their accompanying houses of worship, compounds have been the only structures I’ve ever known.

Now, three months ago, a Muslim mosque gets built smack dab in the middle of this white population and while I don’t have any issue with it whatsoever I think it has elevated my own internal dialog about what we’re doing, as a country, overseas and at home.

From wire taps to roadside bombs to issues of domestic terrorism there is no way that you can be plugged into the goings-on of this country and not feel something when your only touchstone to making any of it relevant is this mosque which sits right outside your house.

I never said this was a bad thing. I never said this was freaking my xenophobic, jingoistic American values. This is just a trigger, that’s all. I will admit that I feel horribly about what I think when I pass by and first see those praying and then the courtyard just past it filled with children of those very same people playing basketball and having fun with one another. There’s something to be said about not being so damned sensitive to journalism’s recent ethos to make every story relevant to whatever town you live in and just like Bill Hicks once said in his comedy act, [Revised for accuracy] “Watch CNN Headline News for 1 hour, it’s the most depressing thing you’ll ever fucking do. ‘WAR, FAMINE, DEATH, AIDS, HOMELESS, RECESSION, DEPRESSION. WAR, FAMINE, DEATH, AIDS, HOMELESS …’ Then, you look out your window … (makes cricket noises) Where’s all this shit happening?”

All I can say is that I’m white, have very limited multi-cultural experience, am seriously ignorant of all things Muslim and have a hardcore predilection for all things news related.

Sincerely,

Me
aka He Who Swears There Is No Agenda Here

Another letter which came in this week answered my not-so-rhetorical query about whether the world really needs a piece of art, i.e. movie, about the events of 9/11:

In contrast to that you have “Flight 93”, and I have to admit this trailer got me. I had no idea what the film was about until halfway through the trailer and then I could feel my heart beating a bit faster. It’s very effective, it is in places manipulative but that’s the nature of trailers, and most importantly it captures my interest & ensures that I’ll plonk down the $10.50 to watch it. As to the subject matter, there will never be enough time passed for everyone to think it appropriate material (look at the comments section at IMDB). The best we can hope for is that enough time has passed for the exploitative Movie of the Week phase to have ended. Greengrass has a good reputation, I first heard of him on “Bloody Sunday” which takes a subject of similar passion / depth and treats it respectfully and still manages to get a good film out. Oddly it strikes me as a good thing that this film wasn’t directed by an American, and the first arguement would be that an outsider would have some distance and be able to treat the subject fairly, but that doesn’t hold water. The actual reason ties into the American culture / political situation, an American director that deviated even slightly from the officially accepted history would be labeled as a traitor (see Ann Coulter), and seen to be dishonouring the memory of those who died. Not the best situation for any filmmaker, nor anyone else, where even your comment about McCain will undoubtedly draw some e-mail calling you into question.(Chris Says: I try to look past camps like Republican and Democrat and I really do believe that more people need to scrutinize politicans based on their actions and not their policitial party leanings; I can like all of Michael Bay’s movies but if I like them just because Bay has made them there is something wrong with that logic. I happen to really like THE ROCK but I think that PEARL HARBOR is too long, too superficial even for a summer movie and deserved the thumping it did at the box office. John McCain (R-Arizona) is really someone, among dozens, who has a unique voice in a din of dingbats trying to get TV time with their pre-fabricated, plastic and wooden delivery about what they would LIKE to do if given a chance. McCain comes correct and is trying to make a difference, in my own OPINION.)

I am looking forward to this film, not in the usual blockbuster sense, but rather I expect to see a film that will leave me with questions and move me out of my comfort zone, things that are all too rare in new films.

Succinctly worded and I very much appreciate the honest sentiment.

We’re equal opportunity here folks. I don’t know when rage will get the best of me and I decide to fire back with an explicative laden email if and when the criticism is too much to handle but for now I feel comfortable with fielding any and every opinion with one of my own in a manner that is befitting of a site named Poop Shoot.

Do enjoy this week’s offerings as I hope if you have not yet done so do check out the teaser for CLERKS II. It’s a keeper.


HARD CANDY (2006) Director:David Slade
Cast: Patrick Wilson, Ellen Page, Sandra Oh
Release: April 14, 2006
Synopsis: A smart, charming teenage girl, Hayley probably shouldn’t be going to a local coffee shop to meet Jeff, a 30-something fashion photographer she met on the Internet. But Hayley’s ready to have fun, and soon she’s mixing screwdrivers at Jeff’s place and stripping for an impromptu photo shoot. It’s Jeff’s lucky night ““ until his vision blurs and he passes out. Turns out Hayley isn’t as innocent as she looks after all. In fact, she has a lot on her mind. Like getting Jeff to confess to his penchant for teenage girls ““ and to what he did to Donna Mauer, the girl who disappeared from Jeff’s favorite coffee shop. When Jeff awakens, he’s tied to a chair. If he doesn’t cooperate, Hayley has something to help him along–a little surgical procedure she picked up on the Internet. All she needs is an ice pack. And a knife.
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Negative. Okay, right out of the gate, I’m not sure if the material isn’t so much provocative as it is derivative.

I know that pedophilia is a subject that has been touched on as of late in the really well made WOODSMAN and has been so creepily depicted in HAPPINESS that you feel like washing your eyes out with bleach after having seen it. The notion of adults, namely males, who seduce young’uns is nearly a genre all in itself and, my opinion is, that instead of every person making this kind of film having to field questions about the controversial nature of their movies there should be a dialogue in the press about how this informs the genre in a new or fresh kind of way. I am bored to tears, and I assume the filmmakers are as well, when the focus is on public sentiment than it is focused on how a new angle is explored that others have not.

What I don’t like, then, about this trailer is that I frustratingly sit through this thing in hopes I’ll be treated with that very same freshness. What I get, though, is an opening that is reminiscent of CRY_WOLF when an IM exchange goes by blisteringly fast. I realize realism isn’t on the list for a slasher-type movie but this is a movie about some adult diddling a child. Save that, there is a real good sense of creepiness that is pasted all on this thing. You get the feeling all is not bubbles and gum.

Heuristically, the exchange between these two should be a cautionary tale about kids using the Internets whilst unsupervised but this is material for the 10 o’clock news team with Ric Romero telling us something we already know. Nothing really earth shattering about this flimsy set up but it does get going when the young girl and dude hook up. Again, I expect something, anything, but these two talk to each other in a Saturday Morning Special cadence and has be rapping the counter with my fingers.

Hopefully trying to get something new out of this trailer I play this on and then am treated to a moment where creepy guy wipes off a hunk of chocolate cake off the lips of his young prey with his fingers. Please. Does anyone ever have that much schmootz on their face that they leave some honking piece of food left on their lips without quickly reaching for a napkin?

The cinematography, though, is really engaging and that is what is saving this trailer from just being a waste of everyone’s time. The screen time shifts in an elapsed sort of way as the lo-fi music beneath everything makes it all seem more and more desperate.

You get the obligatory Sundance props, which ought to be earlier on in this presentation, while getting the feeling that there is more to this guy than just his predilection for sweet meat. I don’t know if the angle here is that the prey becomes the predator but that’s what the quick clips would have you believe.

If this is the case, then, what’s here is more of a man bites dog kind of a story and, if it is, will that be original enough to have people see this movie? I don’t think it is for me.


SEE NO EVIL (2006) Director:Gregory Dark
Cast: Glen Jacobs, Joseph Cappellitti, Craig Horner, Tiffany Lamb, Penny McNamee, Samantha Noble, Matthew Okine, Michael J. Pagan, Luke Pegler, Cecily Polson, Rachael Taylor, Christina Vidal, Steven Vidler, Michael Wilder
Release: May 19th, 2006
Synopsis: A group of youths from a juvenile corrections facility are assigned to renovate an old hotel over the weekend and end up being terrorized by a crazed serial killer who dwells on the upper floors.
View Trailer:
* Medium (Windows Media)

Prognosis: Negative. I appreciate the chance to ogle some woman taking a shower all by herself, never minding that no woman who looks as good as her would themselves to take one in a shower stall so covered in muck and crap without making a man clean it first, but I don’t think there is an appropriate amount of time for me to feel she is in any danger. The camera shifts so much that it feels blocky, forced and too rapidly gone through. By the time her scream echoes away and I am greeted with the WWE Films logo I am wondering what just happened.

I love that instead of getting some basic information about what led a pack of good-looking teenagers into one of the most dank looking movie set ever created we are instantly greeted by the WWE wrassler Kane being all mean and ugly.

I don’t mean to dismiss this obvious teensploitation flick ever so quickly but even for the awful HOUSE OF WAX and the recent, better than it should’ve been, TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE had the supposition in its trailers that people might want to know what happened to these kids which have led them to this moment; I would’ve liked to have seen that but what I get after the initial ugliness of Kane splashes across the trailer is a lot of girls screaming.

How is this supposed to get me to part with my money?

It doesn’t and that’s the problem. If you want guys to come out to see chicks get brutalized and objectified in their shower stalls then I think you’ve got something in this trailer. If your aim is to capitalize on the success of a wrestler whose prowess on the screen seems to be a whole lot of non-talking and walking menacingly with an axe then I think you’ve got something in this trailer. But I don’t think this is all there is. At least I hope there isn’t.

One of the best things about horror movies, good horror movies, is the wafer thin plot upon which they’re built on. No matter how miniscule the situation you’ve got to explain how these people arrived at the point at which everything goes south for them. Even if it’s because one of the chicks really needed to take a dump in the middle of a long road trip through a small New England town which, gasp, doesn’t show up on any map whatsoever then at least it’s something.

A trailer based on nothing but money shots which don’t buy you any currency with me isn’t just lazy trailer making it’s bad business sense which presupposes an audience who you seriously misunderstand and misjudge. Give the kids a little more credit than this trailer.


EL LABERINTO DEL FAUNO aka PAN’S LABYRINTH(2006) Director: Guillermo del Toro
Cast: Ivana Baquero, Doug Jones, Sergi López, Ariadna Gil, Maribel Verdú, Álex Angulo
Release: October, 2006 (Mexico)
Synopsis: “Pan’s Labyrinth” is the story of a young girl that travels with her mother and adoptive father to a rural area up North in Spain, 1944. After Franco´s victory. The girl lives in an imaginary world of her own creation and faces the real world with much chagrin. Post-war Fascist repression is at its height in rural Spain and the girl must come to terms with that through a fable of her own.
View Trailer:
* Medium (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Lost in transition. One of the worst things I had to endure in college English classes, as I reached higher levels of completion, was having to be tested on being given whole passages without any context and having to attribute the author of the work and the work it was taken from. It was brutal, yes, but one of the things it taught me was that authors have fingerprints. There are, stylistically, ways you can tell where something came from. This is why, yes, I admit, I was going to goof a little on the plasticity of the set/location used to create the world in which these characters live.

It kind of feels like it’s a Little Red Riding Hood/Beauty and The Beast, don’t even get me started on the ironic Ron Pearlman connection, and the cinematography hearkens back to HELLBOY’s dark and gloomy atmosphere. There is no question that this is a Del Toro movie but the question is whether there is more substance than there is style.

So, as the trailer opens and you have some galloping girl walking down some steps that lead down into a pit, which no girl would ever go alone, I half expect the B.P.R.D. to come out with a red looking demon leading the charge. It’s creepy in a way, and that’s testament to Del Toro’s ability as a filmmaker, and it only gets a little more weird when one of the pieces of flora in the underground lair of the odd and strange comes alive.

Before you can say “Wha? Huh”¦” the screen snaps quickly away to a faceless mutant, I don’t know how else to say it, who is sitting at a wooden table with a pair of albino pink eyes sitting on a plate as its claws(?) extend slowly from its hands. I can’t account for why this is inserted like a bon mot but the subsequent scene of the same stupid girl who went down below into a dark cave walking through a fairy dusted opening of a cave of some sort.

My head hurts from the reliance of showcasing the oddness of this movie and I can’t for the life of me understand why you would want to be so clever as to offer nothing as to where any of this is coming from.

We revisit the mutant from before who now has eyes in the palm of his hands, embedded in his hands, and this finally (for whatever reason) seems to put a little fear into the chick’s heart as she looks ready to soil her Underoos.

I love it, and I am giving genuine props, that we get a little bit of EXORCIST type of breathing underneath the wordless, musicless quick clips we’re offered. The one problem with this is that the clips barely, barely, come into focus before jaunting off to another clip that wholly has no bearing for the one that preceded it. I’m not trying to complain but this is already a weird kind of movie and this isn’t helping.

I like Del Toro. I loved DEVIL’S BACKBONE back when no one else knew who he was. I’m not touting my ability to recognize any kind of talent out of anyone but even that movie was able to establish a linear pattern of events that leads up to the creepy. I don’t get that here and that frustrates me. I want to know more about this movie without having to consult the IMDB and I want the trailer to tell me what it’s all about.


CLERKS II (2006) Director: Kevin Smith
Cast: Jeff Anderson, Brian O’Halloran, Rosario Dawson, Trevor Fehrman, Jason Mewes, Kevin Smith, Marty Kudelka, Jennifer Schwalbach Smith, Wanda Sykes
Release: August, 2006 (Tenative)
Synopsis: The sequel picks up 10 years later. “It’s about what happens when that lazy, 20-something malaise lasts into your 30s. Those dudes are kind of still mired, not in that same exact situation, but in a place where it’s time to actually grow up and do something more than just sit around and dissect pop culture and talk about sex,” Smith said during an interview at his Hollywood office. “It’s: What happened to these dudes?”
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Positive. August 30, 2004.

This was when WheelieBlog.org was officially taken away from the public as an available web site where people could champion and meet other like-minded individuals to talk about what is, ostensibly, the greatest stunt one can perform with a their Huffy. When Randal uses his official Mooby kiosk to inevitably conduct non-business related surfing it is this site, whose logo is a wheelchair, which looks to be used for whatever nefarious purpose it will serve him. What this site and the date referenced above have to do with the movie, then, is that you begin to see that this wasn’t a movie that was slap dashed together with the only aim of milking these characters for one more go around on a whim. Fanboys may have raged about the working title for the film, PASSION OF THE CLERKS, which doesn’t appear anywhere for good reason, logical reasons if you have half a cell in your brain that’s firing, but there’s no other way to put it than this trailer gives the devotees of Smith’s movies enough to make this more than a teaser and defies convention with the choices made in its ultimate construction and delivery.

Primarily, the trailer doesn’t adhere to traditional notions of what the teaser should be. Instead of just giving a whiff of a story and going the tease route, most egregiously executed by the makers of the X-MEN 3 trailer, this is actually a mix of teasing yet satisfying nuggets of possibilities and innuendoes. We may not know how things are going to begin, peak and then crescendo but it does start at the most logical point of reference and then uses this moment to take point for the rest of the tease.

As a point of fact that you can put down in your Rolodex or Etch-A-Sketch I don’t think Anthrax’s “Among the Living” has ever been used for a teaser, and I don’t think it will again anytime soon, but it’s utilized appropriately not only in capturing the frenetic nature of what is surely a movie that has to balance multiple characters all at once like some That’s Incredible! dinner plate spinning maestro.

So, when it’s Dante who says, “Oh..my..God” after opening the lock to the nefarious and infamous Quick Stop (which should’ve been his demise had the ending not been changed) you don’t know, and not shown, what is causing him to react thusly. But, we’re not left to be teased too long as the aberration of a seemingly-still-unemployed Jay and Silent Bob in the Mooby parking lot causes the kind of geek joy which seemed all but snuffed out at the end of JAY AND SILENT BOB STRIKE BACK. Say what you will about Jay and Bob but if you’re any kind of fan of CHASING AMY who could deny the righteousness of Bob explaining his desire to be a dancer in Vegas? It’s nice to see the duo back again like some Riggs and Murtaugh team-up.

It’s then on to the introductions of our players as we get a little bit of movement from the likes of Rosario Dawson, Trevor Fehrman, Jennifer Schwalbach Smith and the rest of the old crew. It’s also about here when we get Randal doing his best not to do any work while working, a true hallmark of his character’s ethos from the first film, as he applies a blink-and-you’ll-miss-it penis, in full explosion mode, next to Trevor’s face on an Employee Of The Month plaque; one hopes that there is a young liege/master relationship here where Randal passes on his encyclopedic knowledge of all things slack to a younger generation.

I must give my whole one sentence paragraph props to a Village People looking Ben Affleck who rocks a handlebar moustache with as much aplomb as any 70’s era pornographic movie star who has come, and come again, before him. Well done and he didn’t even have to say a word.

I don’t know how to correctly categorize the number of quick clips, my Adult Attention Deficit Disorder pleasure center was delighted if not overwhelmed, which assaults us with images and sights that have nothing and everything to do with one another. I am at a true loss as to why it seems everyone at the end winds up at what appears to be a club for either a concert of some kind (my only indication is the Morris Day & The Time ending to JASBSB which worked well as a punctuation mark on the whole movie) or night of disco dancing and would thus explain Affleck’s appearance but this is a teaser trailer that teases well.

Sp, what happens when characters are allowed to grow up, to get into their thirties and hopefully realize that the world doesn’t revolve around their own problems and then be revisited years after their first ending was so satisfying? Only months from now will tell.

Scrubs Blog: Week 11

Filed under: Production Blogs,Quickcast Commentaries,Quickcasts,Scrubs Blog,Video — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:34 pm
scrubsheader.jpg


VIDEO BLOG #28: “: “My Kick Back” ““
Before we get to your fan mail, here’s a little look at just how many practice ostrich hits it takes to get a stuntman into a room, from episode 5×08, “My Big Bird””¦ No word yet on how many lightbulbs can be changed.

11-scrubs-01.jpg

Download Scrubs Video Blog #28:

  • Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 9.55 MB)
  • Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 4.15 MB)


VIDEO BLOG #29: “My First Mailbag” ““
Last week, we asked you to send in your questions for the cast & crew ““ and you sent in *a lot* of questions. In fact, you sent in so many, that we weren’t able to answer them all”¦ and we had to divide the responses up into three videos. If your question didn’t get answered in this round, don’t worry ““ your questions have been saved, and we may very well be doing this again in the near future ““ at which time we’ll open it up for new questions as well, so start thinking. “¦

11-scrubs-02.jpg

Download Scrubs Video Blog #29:

  • Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 133.97 MB)
  • Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 59.13 MB)


VIDEO BLOG #30: “My Second Mailbag” ““
More questions answered”¦

11-scrubs-03.jpg

Download Scrubs Video Blog #30:

  • Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 105.80 MB)
  • Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 46.18 MB)


VIDEO BLOG #31: “My Third Mailbag” ““
Wrapping up this edition of the mailbag ““ and a big *THANK YOU* to every one who sent their queries in”¦

11-scrubs-04.jpg

Download Scrubs Video Blog #31:

  • Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 146.51 MB)
  • Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 64.78 MB)


BLOG-COMMENTARY #1: Episode 5×07 ““ “My Way Home” –
Writers Neil Goldman & Garrett Donovan sat down and recorded a special commentary for episode 5×07, “My Way Home.” All you have to do is download the mp3 file, cue up the episode on your TIVO, VHS, DVD, or computer, then hit play on the commentary. Hope you dig it”¦ And let us know if you want more.

11-scrubs-05.jpg

Download Blog-Commentary #1:


“THE TODD” BLOG #5: “My Way Home” –
Yes, even “The Todd” ““ the omnisexual surgeon played by Robert Maschio ““ has been keeping a blog, and here’s his fifth entry. The man ain’t right.

11-scrubs-06.jpg

READ The Todd Blog #5:

##

« Newer Posts — Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress