Category: Trailer Park

  • 10 Quick Questions: David Paetkau

    10quickquestions.jpg

    by Christopher Stipp

    Archives? Right Here…

    Instead of manning-up and actually going the emotionally hard route of being outrightly rejected by publishers, I’m rejecting them first and allowing you to give my entire book a preview, let you read the whole thing or, if you like, download the whole damn thing at no cost. Download and read my first book “Thank You, Goodnight” for FREE.

    Zachary Levi of “Chuck.” Missy Peregrym of “Heroes” and “Reaper.”

    It’s always a delight to interview an actor or actress “on the verge,” as it were, and get an opinion on their career and work while they’re still in that stage of being unguarded and still possess a good sense of humor about their place in the food chain of entertainment.

    When I was asked whether I’d want to interview David Paetkau for ALIENS VS. PREDATOR: REQUIEM (Opening today, Christmas Day) there wasn’t a moment of hesitation. Apart from thinking I was going to interview a Hawaiian (I mean, come on, look at the name. I should have tossed in a question about Poi…now I’m depressed I didn’t.) I believe that this is exactly the kind of person I really enjoy talking to for a variety of reasons; one of the biggest ones, though, is that for those of you who have ever had the kind of career where you’ve had some success and are making your way up the ladder it is that drive, that hunger to go farther from where you are today, to be better than the other guy, is what’s most interesting. Once you make it, it’s all about reflection and experience and who here hasn’t read an interview with some A-lister that seems less to be about the work and more about how great it is to work with X or how funny X is off the set?

    Doesn’t interest me.

    What I immediately saw in the prospect of interviewing David by e-mail is that I could not only give the man a little time to think about the answers but that I could stretch the bounds of what I would have normally asked him had we been able to have a proper sit-down conversation. What you see below is the accumulation of less than a days’ worth of familiarizing myself with his work and me thinking of a few things that I might have never asked if I was sitting right in front of him for fear of the response.

    I don’t usually do e-mail interviews but as I read his answers I have to believe that this could be my favorite means of getting to know someone. David was a champ for handling my questions with aplomb and I have to be honest by saying when and if I see ALIENS VS. PREDATOR: REQUIEM I’ll be seeing it just to find out if he’s one of those who gets eviscerated.

    Much thanks and praise must be given to David for playing along…

    1. I researched and found that you were recently nominated for the Canadian equivalent of an Emmy for your work on “Whistler.” Now, I recently heard about some football, the pigskin type and not the footsie femme ball that is somehow loved everywhere else but in America, players who love all the records they break but somehow feel hollow if they have no ring or championship to show for it. What is your take on your profession, that people love to have awards shows and talk about who might win what and the studios that push hard for some films to “win big” or the pundits that somehow feel like an award is validation of someone’s goodness? Or, to put it another way, do you enjoy the thrill of possibly winning something to put on the mantle?

    DAVID PAETKAU: Sure I do, but it certainly wouldn’t be for career ‘validation’. I think it would be a rush and a helluva party, that’s why I’d be happy just to get nominated as the saying goes. If acting were a team sport where there was a set goal at the beginning of the season, that goal being the sole purpose of the team, like the stanley cup in hockey then yeah I could see how one might feel hollow if they have no ring or championship to show for it. Luckily acting in itself is not a team sport and the reward I enjoy most is making a living doing something I love (most of the time anyways).

    2. Aside from the really sweet chance to be up and close with some of the most recognizable movie creatures ever created, and the sweet payday, were there any reservations about getting involved with the ALIENS VS. PREDATOR sequel to a movie that originally did OK and that some fans thought lacked the kind of bite they were hoping to get?

    DAVID PAETKAU: Yeah, there were some definite reservations because they wouldn’t let us read the script. it was ‘locked’ and ‘secret’ … so i had no idea what i was getting into! I still decided to jump onboard, because I figured it’s better to regret something you did do then something you didn’t do. It also helped that Aliens is one of my favorite movies.

    3. How difficult is it to sustain genuine fear for multiple takes on a film of this scale? Does your character get killed off early after someone tells you to “Walk down that way real far and keep alert”?

    DAVID PAETKAU: It can be difficult to sustain genuine fear. Especially on a long night shoot when it’s pissing rain, you’re soaking wet, you’re cold and you’ve got a million things to think about just to get hit your mark correctly and not mess up the shot. When my character does die it’s not as a result of taking bad advice. Dale’s just trying to get the hell outta dodge, which is quite a sensible plan if you ask me.

    4. Canada is best known for its hockey and back bacon. You’ve made a successful name for yourself up north but what’s been the difference between the work you’ve done in Canada versus the work you do here in the U.S. of A?

    DAVID PAETKAU: Is there a difference?

    Now that the dollars are on par, not much, especially when you shoot in the states outside of L.A., but there is a big difference when you work in Hollywood, in that it’s fricken’ HOLLYWOOD! Nothing beat the first day I drove to work at a Hollywood studio. It was a dream come true.

    By the way, Canadians call back bacon, ham. : )

    5. On your IMDB page there are a few people who make mention of your “hawtness” or that you’re “gorgeous.” Does seeing this kind of superficial attention validate your decision to make a living by being in front of the camera and, if so, how great is it to be you on Saturday night at a club?

    DAVID PAETKAU: I’d be a fool not to be a little flattered. Hasn’t helped me at the clubs though.

    6. Talk to me, because I think we’ve gotten to know each other pretty well here, what did you take away from the experience of working on ALIEN VS. PREDATOR: REQUIEM?

    DAVID PAETKAU: A year’s worth of anticipation… (and a couple of props, but don’t tell anyone)

    7. If you’re a fellow geek then you’ll know where this question is coming from but what was the mood on set as the Strause brothers navigated their way through the takes on this film? Were the Predators and/or Aliens allowed to improvise song and dance routines or did some chug their Starbucks through a straw or did any of them put their arms out saying, “Look at me! I’m a scary alien!”? I’m just saying, sometimes there are directors who take this thing seriously and there are some who have fun with the process of a flick like this.

    DAVID PAETKAU: There were some funny moments, and maybe they’ll be a few outtakes in the dvd, but like I said before, we worked mostly nights, cold, impossibly wet nights and if you’re going to slow production with a joke at 4:30 in the morning, it’d better be damn funny, because otherwise you’d have to face the wrath of a soggy crew. I did have a rather surreal moment though when I first saw the seven foot tall Predator. It was at the craft service table and the poor guy was looking for sugar for his coffee, so you were right on with that; Predators drink coffee with a straw, long straws mind you. I, of course, held the sugar at arm’s length and demanded he do a dance number for it. I believe he did an Irish jig.

    7. Have you ever, and it’s OK to be honest because it’s just you and I talking, bought a copy of your work on DVD to give either a mate or family member? Buying your run on LAX or a copy of FINAL DESTINATION 2 would be something, I think, you should be doing for your loved ones to prove you’re not slacking but I am always curious to know if there’s any thrill to having your work on sale for the world to see.

    DAVID PAETKAU: Nope, but I guess it is kind of nice to know that I could. Those movies are out there forever whether you like it or not.

    8. On ALIENS VS. PREDATOR: REQUIEM were you subject to working with green screens, tennis balls or having to react to things that weren’t there and, even if you didn’t, did you at least get a glimpse into how modern day special effects are being done on blockbusters this size?

    DAVID PAETKAU: No tennis balls, but I did have to pretend that cold slimy goop was alien blood melting my face off. The toughest thing was the man in suit aspect. A guy dressed in an alien costume with rubber claws isn’t intimidating up close. The cool thing about the Stause brothers was that they edited each scene as we filmed it. They’d have the sequence cut together on the spot, send it to the second unit with notes on exactly what other shots they needed. It was amazingly efficient. It was way beyond just playback.

    9. ALIEN VS. PREDATOR: REQUIEM is being opened on Christmas. A little odd, nes’t pas, for a movie like this to be associated with the holiday season but I’d like to know what your thoughts are on release dates with regard to the hubbub about how important they are to some studios’ decisions to release or not release films on certain dates. Obviously, something is afoot in the decision to do this but, in your opinion, does it really matter when a film’s released if it’s good enough?

    DAVID PAETKAU: I guess the theory on a Christmas release is that it’s good counter programming to all those damn oscar movies. I’m a little nervous about the release date because i think it’s incredibly important to a film’s success no matter how good it is. Look at the Assassination of Jesse James, a great movie which had a terrible release date (amongst other things) and it flopped miserably. I think they should have released AVP-R it in October before Halloween, but hey, i’m not a studio executive… yet.

    10. How do you see your progression as an actor? Is everything a stepping stone to something else you want to accomplish or are you comfortable with how projects come your way or is there something else you hope happens as you take steps forward in your career?

    DAVID PAETKAU: Acting is merely a stepping stone to bigger and better things; writing, directing, running a studio, going into politics, and then ruling the world.

  • Trailer Park: Best of 2007 Part 1

    By Christopher Stipp

    Archives? Right Here”¦

    Instead of manning-up and actually going the emotionally hard route of being outrightly rejected by publishers, I’m rejecting them first and allowing you to give my entire book a preview, let you read the whole thing or, if you like, download the whole damn thing at no cost. Download and read my first book “Thank You, Goodnight” for FREE.

    Before I let you animals loose to do what animals do during their Christmas break I’d like to share a recipe for some alcoholic delight this holiday season.

    It’s called the Oatmeal Cookie and it is, perhaps, one of the most satisfying aperitifs you could ever toss down your gullet as you navigate your way through treacherous social graces. It’s simple enough to shake up but it’s wonderfully dangerous and delicious:

    2 shots butterscotch schnapps

    2 shots Bailey’s

    1 shot Goldschlager

    Stick all three ingredients into a tumbler with ice and shake. Add a spritz of Coke and serve. – Special Thanks to Trafton Nicholls for the recipe

    Yummy and lethal. Be sure it’s represented at all your holiday shindigs. You’ll be thanking me as your stomach feels the warm goodness of a drink that’s akin to wrapping your insides with a fuzzy sweater.

    Now, as we wrap up the year that was 2007 for trailers it is time to look back and see who managed to actually create something out of nothing and tease us all while doing it. This was a year where I saw more of the same being passed off as exciting fare but if you are any kind of reader of this column you should know that this is really a matter of the studio’s needing to impress us, to entertain us, to dance, monkey.

    Trailers have become such an integral part of how a movie gets marketed and released (por ejemplo: How many of you there were all sorts of excited after figuring out that the newest DARK KNIGHT trailer debuted last Sunday night? Yeah, this is how much power they wield) but there still is a vacuum needing to be filled about how well the companies out there are doing their jobs right. I like to let the world know when there’s a trailer people should be watching and appreciating for its intimate goodness but there’s only so much I can do. Not to mention difficult when people ask what I do for this site. Sure, it may sound all hip and cool to drop that you review movie trailers while trying to infuse pithy remarks here and there but it’s hard to do it with a straight face when in the presence of a complete stranger.

    It doesn’t exactly bring boys to the yard, if you catch the drift.

    However, that hasn’t stopped me from doing this thing week after week and year after year (more on that in the coming weeks) and the Greatest 2007 Trailer Awards countdown is no different than any other needless, disposable countdown list that you’re no doubt seeing all over the place. So, without anymore hesitation here are my picks for the best of ’07. I’m counting down 10-6 this week, stay tuned for the rest in seven days:

    10. THE LIVES OF OTHERS: Where else has reading been so engaging? It’s just a tough sell when you have a foreign language film you’re trying to get people to see but we’re so isolationist here in the States that when we see words pop on the screen we’re all but debilitated in ways that Kryponite can’t even hope of doing. You have a mixture here, though, of pure drama and the thin sense of real foreboding. The trailer succeeds where others failed because it doesn’t sell its genuinely engaging story; it takes the next step of playing into what makes us all human and what can happen when our humanity becomes the very thing that is the object of someone’s interest. Creepy and highly effective.

    9. RENO 911: MIAMI: Brilliant. I wasn’t bullshitting the boys of RENO when I said on camera during my interview with Thomas Lennon and Robert Ben Garant when I said that RENO 911: MIAMI was one of the only movies I actually watched more than once this year. The reason that I was brought to the trough of this film’s offerings was its highly amusing and creative trailer. It doesn’t try to hook us with a pop soundtrack that would try and mask the funk of shit comedy like others tried to do this year. This trailer gets by on its own strength and its the opening sequence that not only sets the tone but its everything that comes out of Deputy Junior’s mouth and body that hooked me clean. Walking into doors, getting tazered bro’ by some minx and even the cars peeling out of the garage only to ram into one another was just a peek at what was one of the best ads for a good time at the movies this year.

    8. LITTLE CHILDREN: You can have FATAL ATTRACTION. You can keep that film and boil it if it means that this movie could take its psychological place as a reason why you should never, ever cheat on your lady. This trailer is sparse but that’s the real treat. The train chugging in the background with a heavy dependence on mood evokes the exact kind of emotion that you’re going to feel throughout this film. It sells itself without ever having to pitch itself if that makes any sense at all. The audio of the train careening by as we build up to what should be obvious to anyone with any sense at all, that there is no way anyone is going to get out of this unscathed like the train that will demolish anything in its path, is not only palatable but it reaffirmed my notion that you should never, ever cheat on your lady. She’ll cut your balls off. I have come back to this trailer many times this year if only to try and understand that quiet greatness of this trailer’s power.

    7. TRADE: See this movie? No? Don’t worry, I didn’t either and, from the looks of it, not a lot of other people did. One of the best things about reviewing movie trailers is that I can basically say whatever I want without having to ever see the film to see if I’m right. Usually I have a pretty good barometer for what really stinks and what should have a decent chance of surviving but I can’t place this film in any sort of those boxes. The story seemed to spring from a rather interesting place and its premise doesn’t strike me, and still doesn’t, that would appeal to a lot of people across a wide swath. That’s irrelevant, though, as this trailer showed how you can have a good premise, explain yourself with a little bit of exposition and leave me wanting more with a great back beat. “Agnus Dei” by Rufus Wainright is one of the superlative uses of music that ever was this year. The trailer tugs at you while demanding you keep up with the story.

    6. DAY NIGHT DAY NIGHT: For anyone who wants to talk about trailers always giving away too much of a film I’d like to introduce you to this trailer. Without so much of a scrap of background or context we’re given nothing to base any reason why we should go out and spend money to see this movie but it does not matter in the slightest. This trailer is eerie in ways that I can’t explain but I will say that it’s use of a voiceover is actually well-used and understated to the point of us feeling like interlopers into a moment we feel compelled to try and stop. We don’t know why we feel like something is going to happen, and it’s going to be bad, but the trailer takes the chance to not say anything one way or the other. It’s wonderfully daring and evocative. I can’t stand watching this trailer and not feeling a sense of unease. Mission accomplished in every sense of the word.

    IN BRUGES (2008)

    Director: Martin McDonagh Cast: Brendan Gleeson, Ralph Fiennes, Colin Farrell Release: February 8, 2008 Synopsis: IN BRUGES is the darkly comedic tale of the fates of hit men Ray (Farrell)and Ken (Gleeson). After a difficult job in London, the team is ordered by their boss Harry (Fiennes) to cool their heels in Bruges. Very much out of their comfort zones, the men find themselves drawn into increasingly dangerous entanglements with locals, tourists, and a film shoot. Soon, their perspectives on life and death are violently skewed.

    View Trailer:
    * Large (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Positive. I have great affinity for this trailer for a couple of reasons.

    One, I think we finally are given Colin Farrell in his natural habitat. You watch this thing and wonder what the hell happened with S.W.A.T., ALEXANDER, DAREDEVIL but then remember why MIAMI VICE and INTERMISSION were good examples of what he’s able to do. The guy has something but it just hasn’t blossomed in ways that some pretty boys turn that acting corner like Brad Pitt showed he could do after FIGHT CLUB and 12 MONKEYS.

    Two, anyone who can use the word “retarded” and make it sound funny has got my vote.

    I appreciate the way this trailer begins with a flash. There isn’t a quick cut or a thumping beat to make me feel like I’ve stepped into an MTV video for the movie. This trailer begins with a quite benign back and forth with a priest and Colin. It seems innocuous enough until Colin pops him.

    Interesting.

    The trailer slides easily into putting everything into context. In does it so well that by the time that Colin unleashes his comedic artistry it’s a wonder why there hasn’t been more said about why the It’s a Small World ride at Disneyland had to be “adjusted” due to the increasing weight of people (I’ll go on the record and say it’s mostly Americans). Colin glides right through this thing. Equal parts violent, amusing.

    The whole idea of the film, that Colin has to wait two weeks in Belgium with his fellow hit man and await instructions of what to do, is so basic that it begs an answer as to why someone thought it was ripe for comedy.

    Big-ups, huge praise, needs to be heaped on the narrative voice-over with regard to the letter that Colin reads from the big boss wondering where the two of them are (a case of cabin fever obviously set in and they wanted to take in some sights, insult the locals, that sort of thing) in a bleeped manner that I have never heard before during a narrative. It just made me appreciate the creativity.

    What’s more is that when Ralph Fiennes enters the picture he just adds to what amounts to a true madcap adventure. The cat and mouse shootout that ensues is enough to make you wonder whether this is a comedy or an action/comedy or an action/comedy/adventure or something else entirely.

    I would usually loathe the expression “And what’s more”¦” but I am going to employ it here to sum up what makes this film look like a real treat if, for nothing more than to hear Colin, in his Irish lip, talk about Bruges: “If I had grown up on a farm”¦and was retarded”¦Bruges might impress me. But I didn’t so it doesn’t”. The lilt in his voice is what really makes the dialogue snappy.

    And, one more thing: Jordan Prentice. I know a lot of you didn’t get a chance to see one of my favorite independent movies of 2007, WEIRDSVILLE, he played a mall cop with a thirst for medieval vengeance but he plays the part of a man in this trailer that not only has an amusing quip about where to find a prostitute in Bruges but then becomes a hilarious punch line, literally, when he gets a karate chop to his neck.

    I need to see this movie; I just hope to God all the best parts weren’t employed in the making of the trailer.

  • Trailer Park: Hilary Angelo

    By Christopher Stipp

    Archives? Right Here”¦

    Instead of manning-up and actually going the emotionally hard route of being outrightly rejected by publishers, I’m rejecting them first and allowing you to give my entire book a preview, let you read the whole thing or, if you like, download the whole damn thing at no cost. Download and read my first book “Thank You, Goodnight” for FREE.

    I was never a fan of Tom Hanks’ catchphrase, “Life is like a box of chocolates…you never know what you’re going to get.”

    Obviously, in order for this to be effective you’ve got to drawl it a little bit and affect the posture of a mild mannered southern man. Never believed the genuineness of it. Not once.

    Not until I started doing interviews with people who I knew little about, or who I could find even less information about on the Internet, did I realize how apropos this sentiment is when you’re confronted with the prospect of sustaining a conversation with a complete stranger for twenty plus minutes. It genuinely gets into your head and you simply have to rely on your homework to get you through.

    Hilary threw all that uncertainty out the proverbial window with her completely disarming personality and whip smart thoughts on subjects that range from middle eastern politics in the early 80’s to her quite alarming shoulder shrug attitude when it comes to realizing what kind of profession she’s chosen. What was really telling, and one of the more genuine moments she shared that I am thinking you won’t hear on Entertainment Tonight, was her relating of the scene she did with Tom Hanks in the upcoming CHARLIE WILSON’S WAR (in theaters December 21st) where she was sitting in a hot tub with the man, trying to complete the scene. Tom, essentially, commented on the sweetness of life and how life’s lottery dealt them the opportunity to be actors, to be there sitting in a hot tub and earning a living while doing it.

    Hilary’s frankness about where’s she been, where she’s going and how the writer’s strike is hitting close to home (it has landed right inside it) brought life again, once more, to Tom’s quote. It’s never an easy thing to try and think about what a stranger is going to be like when the digital tape is rolling but it certainly is a blessing to be able and capture humanity as it relates to someone as they talk about a profession where it’s sometimes hard to get real perspective.

    Being true to thine self is hard when you’re a working actor and you are faced with the prospect of not having a flood of work coming in during a strike like this but you would never know this is getting anywhere close to rattling Hilary’s psyche. She is persevering regardless and isn’t letting a simple slow period (this has to end sometime) deter her from keeping on, keeping on.

    CHRISTOPHER STIPP: So, how are you doing?

    HILARY ANGELO: Good. I’m very well.

    CS: Am I just another in a series of interviews for you?

    ANGELO: Well, you are the second in a series of four today. Not too many. We are just starting to do them because the movie is about five weeks away.

    CS: Yes, it is and I finally got a chance to see the trailer last week.

    ANGELO: Oh, good! I’m actually in the first frame of the trailer.

    CS: Oh, you are?

    ANGELO: Yeah, I’m the girl in the hot tub who’s laughing.

    CS: I know exactly who you are talking about.

    ANGELO: There are three of us ““ there are two blondes and I’m the brunette.

    CS: That leads me to my first question for you ““ I don’t know, just by watching the trailer, if I get it still or if I understand what the movie is about.

    ANGELO: It’s funny that you say that because my husband was concerned about the same thing after we saw the trailer. He knows what the movie is about but he said I just don’t know if people will understand ““ is the marketing right? Are people really going to go see this? Well, I’ll put the record straight.

    I think it’s a very important movie to see. It’s really about this one man, Charlie Wilson, who is passionate about Afghanistan’s fight against the Russians in the early 80’s. And through secret meetings and his congressman’s connections, he funded the war. It is more or less the story of how he helped the mujahideen get weapons and the various twists and turns of how he had to do that. He was known as a playboy congressman who never took his job seriously and he became passionate about this one cause.

    And I think it’s a relevant movie today because it really about a man who gets involved in other’s peoples struggle in a foreign country where he doesn’t know any thing about the world of fanaticism. And we are in a place right now that is very similar although it’s in the public eye and not a secret. I don’t want to give away the ending but it’s very relevant to what’s going on today. So, that’s what the movie is about and I play a showgirl/stripper who’s in Vegas with Charlie Wilson.

    In real life, she actually existed. She’s partying with Tom Hanks (Charlie Wilson) and she’s trying to seduce him and he really doesn’t want to have anything to do with her. He’s much more interested in Dan Rather on 60 Minutes talk about the Afghan struggle. But then it just introduces the first 15 minutes of the character he was and going into the history of what he is going to become. He gets himself in trouble by being around girls who drink too much and do illicit drugs.

    CS: What do you think? If all of a sudden ““ we’ve seen the remunerations of things like that today ““ congressmen who don’t live by any moral laws and certainly this seems like a guy who just keeps doing and doing”¦.what in your opinion changed that made him become consumed by all of this?

    ANGELO: I think he just felt sorry for the Afghans who were literally trying to fight the Russians. And of course, this was 1981 when the cold war was the biggest thing we were fighting. You know, the big red curtain. And this was a war that was going on where America wasn’t stepping in and the Russians wanted to make the Afghans communists.

    So I really think he was passionate about fighting off communisms for these Afghans and giving them democracy. I mean, literally fighting with dirt and rocks and the Russians were hitting them with missiles and bombs. So I think that’s where Charlie Wilson gets on the bandwagon and said we have to do something.

    CS: Do you think he played a part in the Russians giving up? The Russians actually got beaten back.

    ANGELO: Right.

    CS: Did he play a part in that coming to fruition?

    ANGELO: Yes, and that’s why it’s called Charlie Wilson’s War. If it wasn’t for him and Gust L. Avrakotos, a real CIA agent, it was him and two other guys working on this war. They had 1 million dollars to fight this war. And until Charlie Wilson came along there was just no way the Afghans were going to beat the Russians.

    So yes, if it wasn’t for Charlie Wilson they would be Communist. So who knows where they would be today. Which is actually the twist.

    CS: Yes”¦the twist being they gave rise to Osama Bin Laden.

    ANGELO: Yes. I don’t know if you’ve read the book.CS: I did not.

    ANGELO: It’s quite interesting and Aaron Sorkin did a great job making that book into a movie.

    CS: I apologize that I am completely ignorant of this, but is Charlie Wilson still around today?

    ANGELO: No, don’t apologize. Yes, he is. I met him at the wrap party. He wasn’t on the set the day that I was there but he was definitely there for consultation. Tom met him and I met him at the wrap party and asked him about my character and what she was like.

    CS: I’m interested ““ what did he have to say about you ““ about your character?

    ANGELO: He said in the book she was described as a showgirl, in the script she’s a stripper. He said she was a showgirl at Caesar’s Palace in the bar. It was just her and her friend and she were just so beautiful that he invited them up to a party with him. He doesn’t know what happened to them but they did have a wild night and the book doesn’t go into the truth of the wild night because I think it’s trying to protect Charlie Wilson, but you don’t really know what happened at that party and if Charlie partook of the drugs that was going on because it was the 80’s and he did get in trouble eventually. But he said they were lovely, fun girls.

    (Laughs)

    He said, “I had a good time with them!”, He’s a big Texas guy. I think he’s been married three times. I met his wife. He’s a character.

    CS: Does he have anything to say regarding the periphery of what eventually was the fallout of this skrimish? It must be a hot button with this war eventually allowing Osama Bin Laden to come to where he is.

    ANGELO: I didn’t ask him about that. I wished I had. But it was just the wrong place and wrong time because we were at a party celebrating.

    CS: Of course.

    ANGELO: You know, you have to sleep at night.

    If I were him, he thought he was doing the right thing at the time. He didn’t know they were religious fanatics. They just really wasn’t a lot known. There wasn’t a Taliban at that time. There really wasn’t the religious extremism. We weren’t paying attention to them. I’m sure somebody knew about it but didn’t speak up.

    CS: You said you were in a few scenes. How long were you on the set?

    ANGELO: I was on the set for about two weeks. And we had to do rehearsals so I have a couple days of rehearsals. It was short in that it wasn’t the three months they were shooting but it certainly felt long to me because it was such a momentous work experience for me. I had never worked with the people I worked with and it was very gratifying to learn they are just regular people.

    CS: What did you take away from working with Tom Hanks? At least, professionally speaking.

    ANGELO: The most important thing I learned from him is that he respects everyone on set.

    He knows everyone’s name from the key light’s assistant, the 2nd key light to of course the actors he’s working with in the scene with him. He just knows everyone’s name ““ he welcomes everyone in the morning. He’s just a real good person.

    And the other thing he said to me, and I think about it everyday, is that “I am so lucky to have this job. I feel so blessed. Aren’t we blessed? Sitting in a hot tub, saying lines, pretending we are drinking martinis. Isn’t this the best job ever?” He just loves what he does. He knows he is lucky. Even though he is extremely talented, I think he deserves what he has. I think he feels like it’s undeserving. He said he’d be doing community theatre in Podunk, Iowa if he could. He’d still be acting, no matter what.

    So, I think the perseverance that all actors need to get through the day ““ is you just have to do just go out and do what you do. He said it’s better than shoveling chicken heads. Yeah, OK, it is better than shoveling chicken heads. Some days it’s really hard when you are working very hard, tightening the belt, and working down the pipeline. For me, I’m not Tom Hanks. I have to still audition and fight the fight. But it was really inspiring.

    CS: I looked over your resume and saw what you’ve been in ““ a lot of television, a lot of one episode, one episode, one episode. Going back to what you were talking about, how do you weigh the content of what you are given vs. the need for your to sustain yourself?

    ANGELO: I wish I could say that I can pass on projects and say, “I don’t really need to do that,” But I do pass on certain things. I’m not going to do a student film or is barely paying me my pay wage which I feel I deserve. I don’t do things like that, but as far as TV, if I’m right for it, I audition for it. I gotta work.

    And jobs like Charlie Wilson’s War ““ that’s a break for me. It’s a big movie. So hopefully with the success of that film my performance is deemed worthy that I will get other work because of it. You just never know. I will say that this part required nudity and I didn’t even think twice about it, where in the past I would definitely say, “No.”

    But, because it was Mike Nichols, Aaron Sorkin, Tom Hanks, Phil Hoffman, Julia Roberts”¦I just couldn’t pass it up. So even going on the audition I said, OK, if I get it, I know I’ll have to be topless. So, that’s something I think about. If there’s nudity it has to be relevant to the story. It’s a very vulnerable place to put yourself in. It’s your body and you are an artist so you want to make sure it’s the right kind of project. So, in that sense, yes, I do have some standards”¦

    (Laughs)

    But I do have to work. I still do commercials and guest star. And I will continue to do it until my agent says, “You don’t have to do that anymore.” But I really do love the work. Even playing a guest star ““ I get to play different characters all the time when it’s a series ““ you do hear actors complain all the time (although I don’t know why they complain about having a series) that they get tired of playing the same character.

    CS: I’ll do that.

    ANGELO: Me too. I don’t mind playing the same character for four years. So, I just have to keep auditioning and get other people to see my work and that fame expands.

    CS: When you do have to do your guest star to do your part, is there anything going on in your mind, like you are going to play the part as it is or is there something that is important to you that you bring to every performance?

    ANGELO: Yes, for me it’s always just truth.

    I have to find the truth of why and how they react, what’s going on in the scene, what about the other people in the scene ““ just always, always is the truth. I don’t like to fake it ““ I don’t want to fake it. I want to really find the experience of the scene. It’s not perfect. It’s a craft. You call on the techniques that you’ve learned and hopefully it works.

    Because, when you are upset, it is very distracting to other people all of a sudden, there’s cameramen, there’s make-up people, there’s hair people, there’s directors. You work off the other actors using techniques and find the truth in the scene. It’s definitely a craft. It’s an art form. But I don’t like to wing it. I try to be as prepared as possible.

    CS: On the subject of it being a craft…I saw that you spent a number of years doing ballet. What came first? Performance dance or performance art?

    ANGELO: My mom said I used to dance in front of the television when I was two years old. I was always dancing. When I was four years old she put me in dancing school and I just fell in love with it. I loved, loved, loved it. There actually was a time when little girls got away from dance and were into soccer and softball.

    But I was very stubborn and into ballet and was so passionate about it. I still am. It got to a point where it was 5 ““ 6 days a week in my early teens and it’s just a grueling art form. It’s hard on your body and you start to have injury to you body at 14 and going to orthopedic surgeons to find out what was wrong with me. Your feet, your hips, it’s just very difficult on your body, especially when you are growing. I stopped only because I was in high school and I wanted to do normal things, like go to football games, be a cheerleader, be in the school play, be class president. I just wanted to have extra curricular activities that weren’t ballet. If you want to be a serious ballet dancer you have to give up everything. Just like if you want to be a professional baseball player, you have to give up everything and just play baseball everyday after school. So I stopped and I think it was a really good decision because I got to do school plays and community theater.

    And I just fell in love with the stage all over again but from a different perspective. I got an agent and started working right away.

    CS: Really?

    ANGELO: Granted…I grew up in Los Angeles so it was much easier for me than maybe other people who don’t live here. You have to come here after high school or college and you start a little bit later in life. I was fortunate to get a chance to start earlier in life, which is good because I think it made me stick around longer than I would have.

    CS: And with this writer’s strike going on, are you being affected by that?

    ANGELO: Yes, definitely because my husband is a screenwriter and he’s marching along somewhere over at Fox Studio today and he’s not working. But he sent things to Disney, November 1st and I’m crossing my fingers that the movies he has turned in will be green lighted, knock on wood. But as far as my career, I think TV is done. Not too much is going on.

    Film-wise, things have to start production March 1st or it looks like the screen actors guild could walk. So, I have a good five months. I would love to get another job next year. I don’t know if we’re going to walk but if it doesn’t get resolved, then we probably will because my contract is up May 31st. It’s just not a good time and this town is really going to suffer. Yes, I guess I am directly affected, through my husband. Not good timing since my movie is coming out so soon.

    CS: That’s what’s bizarre. You have this huge A-list movie and, right behind the scenes, you have this real-life thing happening.

    ANGELO: Yes!

    And I believe in the strike, I really do. It’s just the Wild West on the Internet and the writers need to be compensated and the actors will need to be compensated because we are not compensated either. So we’ll see how it goes. I understand both ends of the story and the producers are saying they just don’t know how the Internet is going to end up making money in the future. But I think they do. I think they have had some guys working on it for 10 years. I don’t know. I hope it gets solved in the next week.

    CS: You’re actually the first real person I’ve talked to that has actually been directly affected.

    ANGELO: Yes, it’s no fun. But what’s great is that the writers are really standing together and I’m really impressed by the guild itself and how they have really stood tall and how show runners are walking off shows. That to me is really impressive. That’s the only way things will get done with any speed is if they really stand firm.

    CS: One last question: When you have things happen like this, when you have a strike going on and these horrible things are going on behind the scenes, is it making you feel that this is really what you are genuinely passionate about no matter what you need to do — dig in your heels, go work at Office Max?

    ANGELO: Yes, it’s true. It’s not like I’m thinking I’ll just pack my bags and move to a different country. This is just a bump in the road. We had a commercial strike a few years ago and the actors survived however, the business did change for commercials after that. We are artists and we have to stick up for ourselves.

    First of all, without the writers, there is nothing. I think it’s just telling the story of corporate America conglomerates and how they just don’t care. They are not taking care of their own people. But yes, my husband and I were trying to come up with a plan. He’s a wonderful skier so he said he would become a ski instructor and we’ll make it work. We’re coming up with ideas and we’ll make ends meet somehow.

    Who knows, maybe we’ll come up with some great invention in the next month. Make a million dollars and then we can make our own movie”¦

    (Laughs)

    But, yes, it’s not making us say, that’s it for us. This is what we want to do and we love it.

    CS: That’s all I have.

    ANGELO: It was great to talk to you Christopher.

    ##

  • Trailer Park: THE POLAR EXCESS Part Two

    By Christopher Stipp

    Archives? Right Here”¦

    Instead of manning-up and actually going the emotionally hard route of being outrightly rejected by publishers, I’m rejecting them first and allowing you to give my entire book a preview, let you read the whole thing or, if you like, download the whole damn thing at no cost. Download and read my first book “Thank You, Goodnight” for FREE.

    How much is that franchise in the window?

    I rode the Polar Express last night. While the obvious assumption here is that I dropped a fistful of acid and took a ride akin to experiencing the full color oddity that was Robert Zemeckis’ 2004 nascent, in some mindless circles, classic.

    The experience itself could best be described as a mind scrambler for my four and almost-two year old. They had read the book enough times to associate the physical reality of the decked out, velvety train car with that of the book. I can’t imagine the conceit that led these kids to believe that what they were seeing and hearing was real could have been any worse than leading them to believe that Santa Claus is real (I apologize to my children publicly right now when they’re old enough to employ Google-Fu on their own) but there was something about the construction of the experience that I not only found intriguing but fairly shameless.

    If I had any gumption or was paid any kind of money to actually put an effort to researching things for my column I would find out what division of Warner Bros. is responsible for the licensing/franchising of the POLAR EXPRESS “experience” but a cursory search of a real train ride near you that harnesses the story’s saccharine mythos yields this badly designed website in New Hampshire for the ride of a lifetime which ultimately led me to the official site for the POLAR EXPRESS train ride experience.

    Taken from the website, the company leading the way for little boys and girls (and the parents, like me, who brought along a little Bailey’s) says:

    Rail Events, Inc. has signed a license agreement with Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. to license and help coordinate train ride events around the country based on the hit movie and award-winning book The Polar Expressâ„¢ written by Chris Van Allsburg.

    Further, “Families are sure to enjoy their trip to the North Pole, complete with cocoa and cookies served on board the train, followed by a reading of The Polar Expressâ„¢ (ed. note – Love the TM usage) by Chris Van Allsburg.

    Upon arrival at the North Pole, Santa will greet the children and each child will receive their own jingle bell, just like in the story. There will be caroling on board the train as your trip returns to the depot. This is a holiday ride the entire family will enjoy.” By all means, see if a train is departing soon from a depot near you.


    Now, I would never begrudge anyone to make a dollar; I would support any half-baked idea to create a buck. (All hail and praise the assholes who plopped down any money for those Billy Bass animatronic plasticine fishes.) However, what I think irks me slightly is the co-optioning of the book as a means to extend a revenue stream a little further into the pockets of parents and rubes who don’t know better.

    Por ejemplo, after you’re sold with a nauseating Josh Grobin, slo-mo trailer, resplendent with all the trickey that makes mothers weep at Hallmark commercials or that one coffee commercial where that douche Peter, with his perfect coif, comes home Christmas morning and brews up some Folgers, there’s a kind of sleaziness to the idea that there’s this ride you can pay money for that’s been endorsed by the suits at Warner Bros. and/or by some marketer.

    I paid the price of admission and I have no problems with it. My kids loved it, they were happy, my wife was happy that they were happy and daddy was happy because of the fine people who make after dinner liqueurs; in some way I feel vindicated in sullying the experience by spiking my hot chocolate, and the hot chocolates of some fellow parents, with something taboo I shouldn’t have brought aboard. By the end of the night my kids had believed that Santa, indeed, visited the train car in which we chugged along for our hour and a half ride and were genuinely amazed by the uniqueness of the experience.

    I think I’m going back again next year if it means I can spend a day or two extra with my family by ourselves.

    At the end of my day I hate to be a part of some ancillary revenue stream of a movie studio that thinks nothing of pimping its properties out under the guise of it bringing families close together. Please. Warners would sooner enjoy my family being driven to divorce if it meant it could make a few more shareholders happy. I’m simply a cynical person when it comes to shameless marketing and plugging and the incessant push to consume the brand even further (Buy the book! Buy the movie! Buy a shirt or hat to commemorate the experience!) and I was honestly shocked as we drove away from the train station and didn’t see one mark on the jingle ball that every kid was given that would somehow let anyone who looked at know that this is was an Officially Branded Polar Express Jingle Ball. I guess that was the cynic in me.

    I’m just happy my kids don’t yet know when they’re the unwitting audience of a Warner Brothers sales pitch.

    Now, on to much more funny news: Pixar most definitely cribbed its plot for its newest film, WALL-E, from 1986’s SHORT CIRCUIT. After I made the accusation there was a curious letter that I received which I just had to share with the rest of the world that just sort of solidified the fact that I hope Fisher Stevens gets himself a good lawyer; it could be payday city.

    “Chris,

    So, as has been my Friday routine for many years now, I read your article while sitting at my desk & drinking my coffee…during which time, I probably should be working. More often than not, I’ll completely agree with your prognoses (on a side note, the notion that prognoses is the plural of prognosis, just seem grammatically incorrect… shouldn’t it be prognosises or prognosi?). Anyway, back to my point.

    I was a little disappointed of your scathing review of Wall-E.

    Although, I completely agree that it holds a not so subtle resemblance to Short Circuit, don’t consider this just another blatant rip-off from an industry who’s seemingly incapable of coming up with an original idea…look at is an homage to one of the late, great, bad, cheesy 80’s movies. Even though it starred Steve Gutenberg, Short Circuit gave every teenaged boy the opportunity so confirm that, yes indeed Ally Sheedy was hot and gave one last chance to see her before she disappeared into obscurity. If Wall-E can flash everybody in their 30’s to a simpler time when, unlike Paris Hilton & Britney Spears, pop culture icons had enough sense to keeps their drug abuse and sexual deviance behind closed doors, isn’t that a good thing?

    All that said, I’m holding out hope that Wall-E is a box office blockbuster…’cause that can only encourage studios to rip-off…I mean, homages to more of the really bad 80’s movies, that although they had almost no artistic merit or any other redeeming qualities, were wildly entertaining. It’ll only be a matter of time before we see feature length, animated versions of Remo Williams, Tremors or Weekend at Bernie’s…and wouldn’t that make the world a better place?

    Keep up the good work.”

    The only portion of that letter I take umbrage with is the very resolute fact that if any red-blooded American tried to steal the story of Fred Ward’s greatest cinematic achievement there would be blood flowing in the street; it would be anarchy.

    WALK HARD: THE DEWEY COX STORY (2007)

    Director: Jake Kasdan
    Cast: Jenna Fischer, John C. Reilly, Kristen Wiig, Tim Meadows, Angela Little Mackenzie, Matt Besser, David Krumholtz
    Release: December 20, 2007
    Synopsis: America loves Cox! But behind the music is the up-and-down-and-up-again story of a musician whose songs would change a nation. On his rock “˜n roll spiral, Cox sleeps with 411 women, marries three times, has 22 kids and 14 stepkids, stars in his own 70s TV show, collects friends ranging from Elvis to the Beatles to a chimp, and gets addicted to — and then kicks — every drug known to man… but despite it all, Cox grows into a national icon and eventually earns the love of a good woman — longtime backup singer Darlene (Jenna Fischer).

    View Trailer:
    * Large (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Negative. No.

    Here’s the problem I have with this movie: there seems to be confusion on the part of either the filmmakers or the marketers. With only the trailer to go off of I can’t be sure whether this biopic that is a goof on biopics is going to be Zucker-like in nature or played for straight laughs. As it stands there seems like to be a lot of reaching going on in order to be funny or to essentially scream, “See what we’ve distilled from every single story about musicians”¦and how we’ve funnily poked fun of them!” I hate it when people want to club you over the head to make a point and that seems exactly like what’s happening here right from the beginning.

    The 6 year old Dewey grabbing a guitar and with a faux voice singing the blues I think is supposed to make fun of the stories of musicians who say they’ve had it in them since they were little but even after we roll on this obvious gag the older Dewey making ladies strip their clothes, the priest who decries it and gets sucker punched for it, the guy puking from being overcome and the wife who plays the part of the Doubting Thomas (a common theme in the stories of people trying to make it big) is just grating for its obviousness.

    They’re looking to lampoon these films but with Reilly’s character tongue flicking ice cream, his creation of a character that is oblivious and obnoxious, his protestation to his wife about walking hard (Ooh, his theme!) and his eventual demand to keep his monkey versus his kids just isn’t funny. I think it might play well to young men in their teens and twenties but they’re not useful for others, like me, who might want to have the comedy thrown at us in more subtle ways.

    I mean, one of the best parts of this trailer is not Paul Rudd’s pathetic display of a character that just panders, but it’s Jack White’s appearance and talk about being able to chop a man in half with his hands that is amusing as all hell. He manages to be the greatest reason why this trailer just seems to be sticking its tongue in its cheek so much, being so ironic and making sure to wink at us as it does so, that it loses its ability to simply be funny.

    The quicker we get to the end I think there is some redemption to be made of this movie. The aging Cox and his run ins with Patrick Duffy, his eventual Disco phase, the sad pitchman moment he has to go through, all these things add up to something for me that gives me a moment of pause. Yes, there could be all the aforementioned obviousness but if it can be smarter than that, if it can be more than just one of those SCARY MOVIE or NOT ANOTHER TEEN MOVIE flicks, if it can be more intelligent with its satire, there could be more hits than there could be misses; a mark of a great screwball comedy.

  • Trailer Park: BEOWULF and Looking Beyond The Numbers

    By Christopher Stipp

    Archives? Right Here”¦

    Instead of manning-up and actually going the emotionally hard route of being outrightly rejected by publishers, I’m rejecting them first and allowing you to give my entire book a preview, let you read the whole thing or, if you like, download the whole damn thing at no cost. Download and read my first book “Thank You, Goodnight” for FREE.

    I do realize that the there will always be big, bloated movies that will always haunt my local cineplex.

    After seeing the haul that BEOWULF, the movie where this is the penultimate example of a book being better than the film based on it, took last week it was hard not to believe that there is nothing that Hollywood can’t turn into a bona fide hit at the box office.

    The problem, though, is that its second week drop of over 40%, its cumulative total around 56 million at this point, means that it has a long road to hoe to get it into the black beyond its predicted budget of around 150 million. Yes, you’ve got those IMAX screenings and all those other kitschy 3-D offerings, to say nothing of international box office, DVD, blah, blah, blah but it doesn’t take away from the obvious point that there is a steep climb ahead for this investment to pay off. I can’t say I’m surprised by the drop when you see that this is Zemeckis second dip into the well of “motion capture” (he gets a little testy when you mention the words animation for reasons I can’t understand) and it has the same bizarre look that THE POLAR EXPRESS had when you compare the two; the same vacant look in the characters’ eyes, the less than fluid movement of the people in the frame and the people’s mouth movements border on dubbed kung-fu imports all contribute as to why this is movie that is good but not earth shattering as some would have you believe.

    The point here isn’t to point a finger at a movie that did solid box office but when you hear about the comparisons of other movies of its kind, the one I heard a few times being A SCANNER DARKLY, there is something I hope to try and figure out about what the difference is between movies of this variety.

    I know that what DARKLY did was use rotoscoping, digitally capturing the movements beforehand and then doing everything else in post, its Wikipedia entry even mentioning the word “animate” (Gasp!), but the one glaring difference I didn’t know before investigating these productions was that DARKLY cost around 6 to 8 million to produce compared to the 150 million that BEOWULF took to get it to the big screen.

    Now, these are apple and orange comparisons although I think Variety would like to have a few words about what constitutes animation. However, and I would posit, if you’re talking about the budgets of movies of similar films and want to have a discussion of economies of scale what on earth was Zemeckis doing that would explain the gap in this creative endeavor? THE POLAR EXPRESS was an OK movie, it wasn’t superb, but with a production budget that went upwards of about 170 million wouldn’t it be safe to assume that there have been more than 20 million dollars of savings that could have been made to BEOWULF to try and get this number down but, even excluding that, there is something about the process of marketing this film that couldn’t bring people to the trough. True, it was number one last week and I am sure there are people who still believe that the opening weekend is the end-all-be-all benchmark but in an age of strikes and shareholders who are demanding more value from their corporate overlords there is just the sense I have about the What If’s that come along with thinking about how many variations of how many different stories could have been had for the same amount of money.

    SCANNER DARKLY didn’t blow the air up anyone’s skirts, yes, but when you talk to those filmmakers who have the penny pincher mentality of being able to make more with less there is something inherently timely about the argument for films that bloat to this size and have nothing more to show for it than a few choice pull quotes and the promise that the 32% drop POLAR experienced in the second week (its third release saw a surge in positive gains, it was Thanksgiving weekend) will most likely ensure a downward trend from here on out. That is, unless, Zemeckis animates a Santa cap on old Ray Winstone…which I don’t think is likely to happen.

    It would be nice if people could learn from past experiences but it looks like the more things change, there are those who want to keep it the same. But it’s not Zemeckis’ fault, either, if any of you think I’m pointing a finger. Again, this is the movie…business. He was slick and smart enough to convince someone to pour money into this movie and if there are any kudos he deserves it is for having a great business acumen, convincing those with a checkbook that this was going to be a lock.

    Now, if anyone out there wants to listen to me I have a brilliant idea of converting some works of Proust into an animated (I have no problems with the word) adventure filled with violence, guns and butt secks. Who cares if this strays from the text, it certainly didn’t stop Bob.

    From the I Love Boobs file: A special thanks has to go out to MAS for their help in getting some of these interviews up on the site. Lord knows I need it and their donations of time and effort is always appreciated.

    >

    CLOVERFIELD (2008)

    Director: Matt Reeves
    Cast: Mike Vogel, Michael Stahl-David
    Release: January 18, 2008
    Synopsis: Secrecy surrounds this monster movie from producer J.J. Abrams (LOST). A mysterious creature attacks New York City, sending the metropolis into chaos.

    View Trailer:
    * Large (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Negative. Nope, I just don’t see what the fuss is about, this modern day BLAIR WITCH PROJECT. The hype doesn’t equate to anything I can see in this trailer.

    Usually, pre-movie release hype centers around a script or a director or even controversy that revolves around a movie’s production yet here, when all anyone had to go off of was a blurry picture of the poster for the film and the doubt whether the flick was going to be called MONSTROUS or the now titled CLOVERFIELD. I am constantly amazed by how much ink some people are willing to spill on nothing more than some clever marketing.

    As it stands, this looks like a mesh between GODZILLA and any number of fauxmentaries, the quite unbelievable drama has the sheen of a YouTube lonelygirl15 stench on it, that pass as entertainment. Simply put, if you’re going to lie to me at least grant me the chance to make it feel like you’re not blatantly trying to suspend my disbelief.

    For starters, the card that reads that there was a “found camera” that captured everything we’re about to see is just a modern hack tool that would’ve been novel a decade ago; thanks for trying, though, as this just starts me thinking like everything from this point has been purposely rigged to make it feel real. Thanks for spoiling my interest.

    The perfectly framed shot of the Statue of Liberty’s head bouncing down the street, I will admit, is pretty keen but the “Oh my God!”s just make me laugh more than anything else because”¦it is all false even in the movie magic sense.

    Hey, a perfectly lit video message for anyone who might stumble upon his camcorder later! What a nice companion piece to go with all this other really good video footage of this attack on New York.

    “Whatever it is…it’s winning”

    From here, I take it, we’re supposed to be assaulted with disjointed shakey-cam footage to increase the tension of what we’re seeing but because we’re already aware, or should be aware, that this is a mix of what we’re supposed to believe is real it just feels needlessly hysterical and over the top. The pixilation of the American soldier’s face is a goofy ass accent that shouldn’t have been done because what comes out of his mouth only does a disservice to the film’s chance of eliciting genuine “oohs” rather than laughing at what they’re doing.

    See, what I hope is being understood is that this movie could be very interesting. The dozen or so troops opening fire in a walking line towards the unseen beast that is attacking New York, should I even mention what happened to GODZILLA when its marketing did all it could to not show you the lizard, is a cool shot. That part is actually interesting but the extended scene of these goofballs screaming their heads off in an obvious soundstage that looks like a quickie mart just takes back any goodwill I’m giving it.

    Same thing goes for the helicopter shot; it’s intense as fuck but when you have the lead actor saying this is a record so people know what happened I can’t help but think that when I try to record anything so people can know what happened at a birthday or a holiday event my camcorder usually craps out after an hour. Unless this guy is weighed down with a Chewbacca like battery belt any explanation of how he can get all this done will just feel well”¦false.

    BE KIND REWIND (2008)

    Director: Michel Gondry
    Cast:
    Mos Def, Jack Black, Danny Glover
    Release: January 25th, 2008
    Synopsis: Jerry (Jack Black) is a junkyard worker who attempts to sabotage a power plant he suspects of causing his headaches. But he inadvertently causes his brain to become magnetized, leading to the unintentional destruction of all the movies in his friend’s (Mos Def) store. In order to keep the store’s one loyal customer, an elderly lady with a tenuous grasp on reality, the pair re-create a long line of films including The Lion King, Rush Hour, Ghostbusters, When We Were Kings, Back to the Future, Driving Miss Daisy, and Robocop , putting themselves and their townspeople into it. They become the biggest stars in their neighborhood.

    View Trailer:
    * Large (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Negative. Sometimes it just pays to be ignorant.

    It wasn’t until I was through the mid point of this trailer when I realized it was Michel Gondry who directed this film. I hadn’t ever heard of the film, I didn’t keep up with the production of the film and it wasn’t until later in the trailer when I read Michel’s name did I put it all together.

    It didn’t take away from the oddness that is his style and, in fact, I was perplexed by what this movie was supposed to be about up until that point.

    I was mesmerized by the premise, mostly. The trailer opens up, innocuously enough, with people coming in to a video store asking about their seemingly erased tapes. I thought it was a unique way to introduce a movie with its insistence on having an extended moment where you have what is a bit of strangeness from the perspective of trying to determine where we are and what time it is. Gondry has a way of pushing that 4th wall ever so slightly and he gets kudos from me for the small, yet effective, visual trick of bending the screen with static.

    Where this trailer eventually goes, with the GHOSTBUSTERS soundtrack beneath it, is a wondrous take-off as Jack Black for once throttles it back a smidge and actually engages me as a viewer. The lo-fi reenactment of the actual GHOSTBUSTERS film, in an effort to somehow salvage his VHS video operation, is equally catchy. I would have no idea that Mos Def had it in him to play such a straight man but that’s the brilliance of Gondry, to take conventional actors and mold them into something more than what we’re used to.

    The second half of the trailer is equally strange but it’s engaging. The recreation of modern films could seem like a one trick gimmick but there’s something more at play if you’re paying hard enough attention.

    There is a sense that this is a film built on how other films can filter their way through reinterpretation. It’s the modern equivalent of a modern cover song; you have what was there before and, if you’re honest and faithful to the source material, there could be something that wasn’t immediately there before you heard it. There’s something new and fresh about the perspective it has and the trailer here expresses some of that between-the-lines love for film. I’m not quite sure the remake of DRIVING MISS DAISY does a lot for my confidence in the success of the film, it gets too “Jack Black-y” for my taste, but hopefully it’s just one moment in a slew of other films they recreate.

    Some of what could immediately be taken for a gimmick surely could be there within the final cut. But, what’s clear by the end of this trailer is that if there is a fair amount of thoughtfulness put into the idea then there could be another reason to just enjoy what Gondry does best.

    If I have any issue at all with this trailer it is that I’m just not sure if this is a movie I feel I need to see immediately; my final impression is tinged with the idea that you have these schlubs who have a old and busted video store, create mini movies to stay alive, Jack Black does his shtick, Mos Def looks like the weigh holding everything down and they all rise to prominence within the community.

    I think the biggest sum of all these parts is: so what? There’s nothing compelling about this trailer and that’s the most disappointing part about this preview.

    THE GOLDEN COMPASS (2007)

    Director(s): Chris Weitz, Bob Shaye
    Cast: Nicole Kidman, Dakota Blue Richards, Sam Elliott, Eva Green, Daniel Craig
    Release: December 7th, 2007
    Synopsis: Based on author Philip Pullman’s bestselling and award-winning novel, The Golden Compass tells the first story in Pullman’s His Dark Materials trilogy. The Golden Compass is an exciting fantasy adventure, set in an alternative world where people’s souls manifest themselves as animals, talking bears fight wars, and Gyptians and witches co-exist.

    View Trailer:
    * Large (YouTube)

    Prognosis: Positive. This could possibly be the best return to greatness I have ever seen for a trailer.

    Based on this shitageous trailer for the film eons ago when it did nothing for me and only served to aggravate my sense that this was going to be nothing more than a lighter version of the CHRONICLES OF NARNIA and that I should just find another indie to indulge myself in because of the bloated nature of this awful looking film, this trailer came out and has changed my attitude 100%.

    Just because it’s going to be an epic it doesn’t mean you have to market it as so.

    Someone got this through their fat skull and realized that trailers were meant to lie to people and, even if your film is six and a half hours you have two minutes and twenty nine seconds to sex it up a bit. The first trailer, which you can see any number of places, is OK. It’s nothing great; it certainly didn’t excite me enough to even talk about. The reason why it lacks in ways too numerous to list is exactly because there are too many things to list. The trailer challenges you to keep a running tab on all the things that are going on.

    Now, I don’t purport to be an expert on the source material. I know a lot of geeks and nerds get their wide panties in a bunch when adaptations stray from the literary text from which they originated. What these dweebs don’t realize is that it is called the movie business for a reason. There are just some elements that have to go by the wayside and some that have to be included. THE LORD OF THE RINGS trilogy excelled simply because of its faithful adaptation, and the company behind the franchise is smart, wickedly smart, for stamping that message within seconds of this television spot. This does a few things but it does one thing in particular that’s important to keep in mind: establishes credibility.

    Once it does this it is the reeling in of all the sleepy elements that made the first trailer so unwieldy. You had so much territory to cover, so much of it went to making it seem like they were saying “Look how careful we’re being with this story too!” when it did nothing for illiterate wags like me who could not have cared less about the source material but needed a brain dead reason to spend the money to see the movie. I wasn’t given it with the theatrical trailer but I’ll be damned if the 33 seconds this spot spans doesn’t make me yearn with abject glee.

    The way it works so well, then, is after its explanation that this company did the deed with the RINGS trilogy and will do it again with this one we’re launched into a screamingly fast rock track that gets right to the quick.

    It’s my base need to be thrilled and excited that genuinely pays off. You’ve got some babushka bobbing bearded dudes with long swords ready to slice and dice, you’ve got Nicole Kidman doing what she really can only do well, look hot and not saying much, toss in some polar bears that are losing their shit right in the middle of a square (who cares about the reasons why this is even happening), toss in a brunette who is doing some of her own battling in the middle of a dark wasteland, also looking hot and not saying anything, get excited by some animals going to town on one another as they try and kill one another and top it off with Daniel Craig dueling it out with the butt of a rifle.

    I am happy I am an illiterate slob with regard to knowing what’s happening here because I have no clue how this all fits together. I am sure the book is a wonderful piece of literature that kids everywhere appreciated with regard to pointing fingers at organized religion.

    I also have no reason why I am especially giddy by a polar bear swatting some canine but if this is an allegory of what people are feeling about predatory, pedophile priests then I am so in.

    This is, head and shoulders, the exact M.O. that should be employed when trying to sell another epic to a public that has been sold on multiple variants of the RINGS trilogy ever since it was shown that it can be successful; there needs to be a reason to go and spend the money.

  • Trailer Park: KING OF CARS and A Thanksgiving Classic

    By Christopher Stipp

    Archives? Right Here”¦

    Instead of manning-up and actually going the emotionally hard route of being outrightly rejected by publishers, I’m rejecting them first and allowing you to give my entire book a preview, let you read the whole thing or, if you like, download the whole damn thing at no cost. Download and read my first book “Thank You, Goodnight” for FREE.

    This is one DVD I don’t have to wish for this year and I couldn’t be more pleased. It’s A&E’s original series, KING OF CARS, and they’ve finally released the first season on DVD. The show’s real attraction isn’t in its plot line, there isn’t one, nor is it for any larger than life individual that so many other “reality” programs tries to lull you into believing was the cause for them getting their own show; it’s the averageness of everyone you see in this show that makes it a standout series and it’s why it is still one of my only favorites out there today.

    One of the things that struck me as I re-watched this unbeleivably engaging series about a car lot on the outskirts of Las Vegas was how much you could identify with these men and women who are out to sell a few people on some deals. You’ve got the ringleader, Chop, who lords over his business with a flair for the extraordinary in order to motivate the unmotivated and for his constant quest to find ways to amuse every last worker under his employ to sell…just…one…more…car.

    You get to know the salespeople by name, by their tactics, their catchphrases. For every single one of us who have ever had to sell anything to stay afloat (some of us still do and you get a lot of people’s stories as to why they’re selling cars) you can identify with these human beings who you see have down on their luck stories and are just trying to survive. While some are just blatantly ill equipped to sell anything more than a box of Chicklets there is genuineness in every person that crosses the lot in order to get an “up” or for every deal that goes south for no good reason.

    And that’s the point here with the DVD: there isn’t any covering up for the deals that don’t get made or for why sometimes even a bad situation can be made into a learning situation. There are no scripted, ham fisted attempts to make a logical plot line fit into a round hole and there are moments when you see salespeople who you follow get told that they’re not good enough to have around because they’re causing the business money and I think this is where the series succeeds.

    Chop is the old fashioned huckster who believes genuinely in what he sells and he’s not out to take anyone’s money who aren’t willing to part with it willingly. He creates an atmosphere of part pressure cooker, part circus sideshow and another part of passion that he hopes rubs off on those he’s trying to make into seasoned sales professionals. The problem with this is that people who dedicate their lives to the sales profession give themselves to a lifestyle that brims with a little obnoxiousness that others who sit behind a desk and push a pencil will never understand.

    Want to know why you’re still allowed to push that pencil? It’s due to a salesperson’s success and any organization that wants to scoff at those who hunt after that feeling you get when your prey takes up a pen and scrawls their name at the bottom of a contract (there is *nothing* like it) deserves everything it gets. And Chop knows this. He treats the job as an un-job. There are no two ways of doing the same deal and this series continues to be a draw for me both casually and professionally.

    Also, I just received word that you can buy this from A&E’s video store at a severely discounted price in honor of Black Friday and Cyber Monday; Christmas came a little earlier.

    Now, it’s also about that time of the year when my thoughts turn to Del Griffith and Neal Page.

    TRAINS, PLANES AND AUTOMOBILES still remains in the top 5 of my personal holiday movies and, really, for good reason; it’s a film that transcends the normal sappy crap and pap that you get with other holiday flicks that normally flirt with the shtick that only after adversity can there be a happily ever after scenario where all is right with the world. TPA took that step beyond any preconception that a holiday movie had to be wacky, goofy and tied up with enough schmaltz to make it abundantly clear you would never come close in real life to comparing with the characters on the screen. TPA made you believe that Thanksgiving was just the means to an end that seemingly had no end and that those of us in the real world who are hucksters, sellers or businesspeople could easily relate to these goofballs who end up with one another. John Hughes finally gave the adults something worth watching, as evidenced by my father who took me to see it when I was still too young to see it myself (Steve Martin’s F-bomb laced tirade to Mrs. Patty Poole was honestly etched into my mind as one of the most shockingly fabulous moments I was ever allowed to witness), and secured his place as a dynamic filmmaker who transitioned out of kid/adolescent specialist and into the purveyor of Holiday Classic goodness.

    TPA stands up to age. It stands up simply because of its faithfulness to its characters and its story. There could be any number of directions where the movie could have slid into Movie of the Week territory but it’s a flick that bucks every effort to put it in Hallmark territory. If you forgive the odd ending that seems to put a too fine a point on a story that could have ended on a more serious note, but it’s still an ending that works, then there isn’t any reason why this movie shouldn’t be a beloved tradition right next to the Macy’s Thanksgiving Parade.

    It’s part of mine.

    Enjoy the holiday…

    WALL-E (2008)

    Director: Andrew Stanton
    Cast: Fred Willard, Jeff Garlin (Voices)
    Release: June 27, 2008
    Synopsis: The year is 2700. WALL*E, a robot, spends every day doing what he was made for. But soon, he will discover what he was meant for.

    View Trailer:
    * Large (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Negative. You’ve just got to be kidding me here.

    One of the first things I was on the record as saying, long before anyone else decided to go along with the theory, was that the concept of Pixar’s CARS was redundant. Seemingly based on visuals and an idea that had come along decades before in a cartoon that had cars that had headlights for eyes and talked out of their mouths where the bumpers are located, the concept was done. It was truly old hat and when Pixar got their mittens on it they did nothing more than add some talent behind the voices and viola.

    RATATOUILLE similarly suffered but only insofar as the marketing went. It happened to be a great story that had less to do with an entire movie focused on a rat but was, at its core, had more to do with the humans in it than the trailers would have led myself and the rest of you in on; it was a pleasant surprise, mind you, and the eventual movie was received well because of its well-rounded storyline.

    Now you’ve got a trailer that, and please correct me if I’m wrong, looks like someone deep in the bowels at Pixar thought that Fisher Stevens’ turn as the world’s greatest Hindi this side of such cross-national emulations like C. Thomas Howell’s twist on the black face in SOUL MAN or Anthony Hopkins’ bucket-o-bronzer for his debonair twist as a Spaniard in ZORRO. Yes, what you’ve got here is a movie, on the surface, that wants to resurrect the look and feel for SHORT CIRCUIT with a little *BATTERIES NOT INCLUDED for emotional measure.

    I mean, really, just LOOK at that robot we’re introduced to in the opening sequence! I usually don’t get emotional about things in a trailer but as the little robot wheels on the screen to change out the light bulb on the Pixar lamp there is really only one reasonable, sound and educated deduction you can make as a rational human being: that’s Johnny Fucking 5! It’s like someone compacted the damn thing and he’s now a quarter of the size.

    I can’t concentrate on what else we have to try and consume here in the trailer as I’m just reeling from the whole binoculars for a head looking alike, the tank tread that makes the robot go forward, all of it. If there ever was a case to be made as to why there needs to be a better vetting process when it comes to stories being eerily similar to something else which was already done and pounded in the ground this would be it.

    Now, don’t take my shock for this concept as being somehow disappointed in the Pixar brand. I bet you all dollars to doughnuts that when this little trash-compactor-that-could finds out what he was really meant for in life that this could be the greatest story since Leviticus. What I am saying is that when you watch this teaser and you are hit with the “whoa” of the diminutive little robot, resplendent with doe eyes, natch, any person over the age of 30 has to scratch their head and wonder why this all seems familiar.

    I didn’t mean to break bad on CARS last year but I still can’t get over how hackneyed the visuals were when you consider that it was done decades ago. Here, as well, we have a visual palate that hearkens back to a terribly done comedy and there doesn’t seem to be anything to take away that would inform me otherwise.

    As far as it stands this just feels like another entry into the SHORT CIRCUIT franchise.

    LAKE OF FIRE (2007)

    Director: Tony Kaye
    Cast:
    Flip Benham, Dr. John Britton, Pat Buchanan, Noam Chomsky, Alan M. Dershowitz
    Release: October 3rd, 2007 (Limited)
    Synopsis: A graphic documentary on both sides of the abortion debate.

    View Trailer:
    * Large (Flash)

    Prognosis: Positive. The trailer demands your attention even before you have a moment to judge.

    One of the things that I really enjoy about finding trailers like this is that you have the expectation that the only way you’re going to have a documentary be accepted into the social consciousness as a project worth commenting on is to have the flash and substance of its fictitious brothers and sisters. A little baiting, a little sizzle, a little Michael Moore-ish type of bravado, is all one thinks they would need in order to turn a human interest piece into a marketing peddler’s dream.

    Not so here.

    What we get is a rather slow and methodical opening that goes against what you would probably expect from a powder keg. We’re given a static but effective “From the Acclaimed Director”¦” jazz that we would expect any good trailer to begin with but it’s the “18 Years in the Making” that starts me wondering. What could have taken 18 years to do?

    Before I can answer I am thrust into the quote given to us by Time Out New York and, frankly, I didn’t think you could toss up that many polysyllabic fricatives without causing the general public to explode from the effort of reading the screen. It’s almost too much to say that there could no way the film could live up to the superlatives hurled upon it.

    Now, when we get to the actual film, the first scene being allowed to play out wherein an older gentleman talks about the impact of education that supports the teaching of using condoms with regard to a little girl who stands right before him the entire time, you’re immediately pushed forward to thinking about what is really being discussed.

    Some protester shouts out that Jeffrey Dahmer was pro-choice.

    You have a wonderfully composed man talking about what is at the core of the debate surrounding abortion.

    Some dude sings God Bless America (I’m thinking he’s on the side of pro-life), some rock and roll woman wearing black X’s on her nipples and donning some leather undergoods vamps on a stage, a person hoisting a sign dressed as Skeletor with the words “Abortion” scrawled on his chest as it carrys a sickle and a doll and then there’s a clinical worker who cleaves the meaning between miscarriage and abortion for a woman who looks scared as all get out.

    Then there’s the woman who talks about three physicians she’s worked for in abortion clinics, all three of them murdered, as we see one of their prostrated bodies on the ground. And who would have thought that Alan Dershowitz would come correct with one of the more profound messages regarding this whole issue: Everybody is right when it comes to the issue of abortion.

    The sheer ambiguity of the angles that usually infuse this argument, be it pro, hyphen, life or choice, is what makes this an interesting trailer that deserves some attention. No doubt that this movie will ignite the passions in all of us regarding this issue but this trailer does an excellent job in presenting its wares without pushing us to buy.

    WHAT WOULD JESUS BUY? (2007)

    Director(s): Rob VanAlkemade
    Cast: Bill Talen, Savitri D, James Solomon Benne
    Release: November 16, 2007 (Limited)
    Synopsis: From producer Morgan Spurlock (Super Size Me) and director Rob VanAlkemade, “What Would Jesus Buy?” examines the commercialization of Christmas in America while following Reverend Billy and the Church of Stop Shopping Gospel Choir on a cross-country mission to save Christmas from the Shopocalypse (the end of humankind from consumerism, over-consumption and the fires of eternal debt.) The film also delves into issues such as the role sweatshops play in America’s mass consumerism and Big-Box Culture. From the humble beginnings of preaching at his portable pulpit on New York City subways, to having a congregation of thousands – Bill Talen (aka Rev. Billy) has become the leader of not just a church, but a national movement. Rev. Billy’s epic journey takes us to chilling exorcisms at Wal-Mart headquarters, to retail interventions at the Mall of America, and all the way to the Promised Land on Christmas Day. The Stop Shopping mission reminds us that even though we may be “hypnotized and consumerized,” we still have a chance to save ourselves this Christmas.

    View Trailer:
    * Large (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Positive. Here’s the deal: we all know the message that Christmas has been commercialized beyond any veil of propriety. It’s immutably tacit every Sunday when you get the circulars in the paper, it’s on every channel on the televison when programs go to commercial and it permeates the environment with billboards, radio spots and everything else that can tell you that Christmas is only X days away.

    We all know this and yet we consume. It seems to be more an issue of us trying to ignore what’s really at the core than it is our apparent consumerism.

    Thanks be to the Lord, then, for Morgan Spurlock showing us what this holiday really, financially, represents. I really think it’s appropriate that we start this trailer with a man at a gas pump asking some deity for forgiveness for something. It’s bizarre but entirely appropriate as we launch into what the hell is going on.

    It’s the montage we’ve all seen when any film fades into the holidays: visages of Santa, copious amount of lights and flickering tinsel, the ramping up of electronic cash registers and the passing of dollar bills.

    “Last year Americans spent $455 billion during the holidays”

    I don’t know why Spurlock has chosen the Disney font for the above quote but it’s oddly comforting when you see the actual factoid roll across the screen; it’s at once sickening and enjoyable.

    We get smacked with some other sobering data regarding consumer spending, get some dude talking about the Christmas spirit and how he gets into the holidays by making sure he has some sweet ass rims on his hooptie. Things feel strange when we get interview footage of people talking about what this time of year does to the frail or meek when it comes to trying have the latest and greatest under the tree for young kids. (I swear, do those of the Jewish faith have these kinds of gluttony issues in the month of December? Would a first step in stopping this problem be that we all convert to Judaism and, therefore, be limited to only 7 presents each?)

    No, that’s no solution but there is Reverend Billy.

    I understand that Billy is part sociological extension of all our greed and avarice, and part carnival sideshow, but there is something about his presence that I just can’t explain. He’s at once obvious but oddly engaging as the personification of what we all know to be true: We spend too much on needless shit.

    I like Billy’s point during one event, on Main Street inside Disney, that all that Americana is coming to you from China is one that resonates even louder with all the issues we’re having with our human-rights bending, manufacturing monolith at the expense of worker abuse, free speech oppressing neighbors to the east.

    While I can’t square my own purchasing habits come this time of the year I do know that we’ve got to throttle spending if we’re ever going to claim to be better than the marketers who know they’ve got us beat.

  • Trailer Park: Tony Dovolani

    By Christopher Stipp

    Archives? Right Here”¦

    Instead of manning-up and actually going the emotionally hard route of being outrightly rejected by publishers, I’m rejecting them first and allowing you to give my entire book a preview, let you read the whole thing or, if you like, download the whole damn thing at no cost. Download and read my first book “Thank You, Goodnight” for FREE.

    I don’t know what it is about the show.

    I will admit that it’s one of those things I simply can’t control, be it the phases of the moon this year or the fact that Tom Bergeron is one of the better television hosts out there, but I can honestly say that the enjoyment I derive from the program is partly due to my four-year-old’s manic transformation when the show is supposed to come on. Thanks to TiVo I can now lord that saved program over her little toddler head but, like Life cereal, dad likes it too. Her exuberance in wanting to see this show (driving me crazy with every day that passes after the Tuesday Results show, asking when the show is coming back on. “Monday! Get that through your non-English reading brain…”)

    I believe this reality show trumps many others in its class from the standpoint that it’s not enough to just be a celebrity and be part of the show, they actually have to do something, they have to earn their keep. Will this program change collective perspectives of our Middle Eastern policy or will it raise the bar for television production? No, but that’s not the point and that’s certainly not why this program is the 2nd and 7th program most widely watched by those in America last week, its consistent performance in the ratings only being matched by their creative celebrity choices.

    It’s a juggernaut of a show and when approached to interview one of the show’s dancers, Tony Dovolani, I took it as an opportunity to try and get a true insider’s take about why this show works as well as it does. Tony actually got his limelight start on the big screen with his turn in 2004’s SHALL WE DANCE and has since performed in over 50 episodes of Dancing With The Stars.

    From being born in Kosovo, Serbia, Tony worked his love for dance into a professional career since arriving in America decades ago and has won his share of World Rhythm championships to demonstrate his prowess as an accomplished performer. His partner, Jane Seymour, suddenly coming down sick with food poisoning to the heartbreaking loss of her mother did not stop the duo from overcoming near elimination a couple of times and the two continued to battle it out on the floor before being leaving the competition almost two weeks ago. Tony took a brief respite from his schedule prior to that to give me an idea of what he’s been up against and tries to explain why America can’t stop watching this program.

    When I spoke to Tony he had been spared yet another week of being booted off and was beginning a fresh week anew with getting himself back into the competition. I commented on how everyone was nearly expecting his exodus.
    DOVOLANI: It’s been crazy. The amazing thing about it was that I was not expecting it. When it happened I was so stunned. I think everybody in the whole world could see how stunned I was.

    CS: I think everyone was. I don’t think anyone was expecting that but how has it been for you this season? How’s the experience been this year?

    DOVOLANI: The good thing about it is that it is a feel good show and everybody enjoys it. Dancing is a very interesting thing. God works in mysterious ways and sends joyful things to people who need it the most. And in this case, obviously Jane, a little dancing in their lives and the trauma that has gone on this season. Dancing has been such an escape for her…such a joy”¦something she has always wanted to do but never gotten to it. I just think this is the right thing for her to go through.

    CS: She has absolutely been through a lot since it started ““ food poisoning, her mother…
    DOVOLANI: Yes, the food poisoning and then Marie passed out in front of her ““ it just seems like it just keeps going. You know things come in three’s and hopefully this is the last and everyone can just enjoy the competition.

    CS: And I watch the program. I have to tell you I have a wife and daughter who hooked on this show and I cannot explain why.

    DOVOLANI: The funniest story that I tell everybody, is that I was in Las Vegas and this guy who’s about 6 foot 8, about 350 lbs…full of tattoos, and he walks up to me and I’m just like thinking he’s going to just get into a fight with me, I was just scared shitless, and he goes, “Are you Tony?” And I said, “Yes.” And he goes, “I gotta tell you, you guys are just awesome.” And I’m going, “What???” Our audience is so wide ““ A to Z as you call it. It’s an amazing thing. Dancing has taken this country by storm.

    CS: You have obviously danced for a long time. You love, you breathe it but what is it that people seem to be attracted to? What is it that made this show so popular? And why can’t I turn away?

    DOVOLANI: It’s amazing ““ I’ve watched Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers movies a thousand times. And I was so disappointed to see that when I came to the United States the legacy that has gone on for 50 years, since the 1920’s, through the 70’s and 80’s had died out because people stopped watching it. But realistically speaking dancing is the only type of program that everyone can watch together ““ kids everybody can watch together. And right now, I call it the second baby boomers, they want convenience. Something they can watch as a family everybody wants to be with the family and everyone can be in the living room and this is the only program that can entertain everyone.

    CS: I absolutely agree with you and as proof I have a 4 year old girl who loves to watch this show.

    DOVOLANI: Because she can dress up in costume.

    CS: That’s it! That’s what she does. She mimics. She is front of the television and she dances around. It’s bizarre.

    DOVOLANI: It’s truly amazing.

    CS: But you are absolutely right, I can watch this show with her and I know what’s coming around each corner and when everyone reads off the scores she reads the numbers with the kind of zeal I don’t usually see in her around eight at night.

    DOVOLANI: Exactly. It’s funny because it’s not just about success…it teaches kids everything from A to Z. Because a lot of times we are surrounded by “You have to succeed.” No, you have to find the positive even in the failure. When celebrities get kicked off, they always talk about how wonderful of an experience this was. They don’t talk about negative. There is nothing negative in life. Don’t talk negative then you will feel negative. You are supposed to enjoy the new experience and that’s what this show is about. About enjoying every single thing you get to do, every character you get to play, it’s fun. And that’s what the essence of this show is. It’s having a good time. Being a child again.

    CS: And how is it when you get to work with somebody ““ I know you’ve done this for a few seasons ““ when you have somebody Day 1 to where they eventually go through the process of learning, moving, do you see a transformation in the celebrities themselves?

    DOVOLANI: Oh, absolutely. Day 1 is like teaching them the alphabet. And then by week 2 they are starting to put some things together and seeing them much happier and then by week 4 when they do their first dance it’s almost like they are in class giving their first recital and they are talking about it. Do you know what I mean? They work really hard and, at the end of the season, what’s amazing about this is that whoever is left they start looking like dancers. They start acting like dancers. They walk around like dancers. It’s truly amazing the transformation in such a short amount of time. You have to understand they put a lot of hours in, but at the same time the fact that they embrace it and all of a sudden become dancers, it’s truly amazing.

    CS: When you start working with someone, what is the core of those you teach should understand first and foremost about any preconceived thought about dancing in general?

    DOVOLANI: Dancing is a sport. This is the part that people don’t realize. Dancing is a sport. It takes physical ability, it takes adrenaline, it takes so much. I remember one year Emmit Smith and Jerry Rice, they said that some of these things were harder to do that playing football. Because this is something that you use muscles you’ve never used before in your life. And all of a sudden”¦.that’s why the body changes so much because you use parts you don’t normally use in everyday life. And it works in such a way that you really don’t feel it until you look in the mirror and 4 weeks later you say, “What’s happened to my body?” Because it changed so quickly. It’s not because they are dieting because they aren’t. They are actually eating more than before because they are putting so many hours in and dancing stretches the muscles and elongates and so on. All of a sudden they feel completely different. And it’s funny, Jane said to me the other day, since her operation on her back, and even before, she was never really able to just get off the bed. And now, she bounces off the bed. “I get up and all my muscles just feel youthful again. ” It’s really amazing.

    CS: So, you just explained that dancing is a sport and when I was preparing for the interview I just happen to catch Extra last night and I saw something to the effect that you gave Carrie Ann a rule book with regard to dancing rules? I took it as a joke…

    DOVOLANI: Oh, Carrie Ann and I are good friends and we joke with each other all the time. Whether there was a lift or not it doesn’t matter. She called me on it and it becomes a debate. The thing is we joke with each. I gave her the real rule book but it was not anything other than joking. She is an incredible person, a knowledgeable person and I have nothing but the utmost respect for her. And as a friend, she is a great friend. And some people took it out of context and twisted my words and made it seem that we had a problem with each other. Which we don’t.

    CS: I didn’t think so. But what really struck me was that there actually is a rule book for dancing. Can you talk a little bit about that rule book? In baseball, basketball, football, there are rules and such but dance?

    DOVOLANI: There is a body ““ as in skating there is a National Dance Council of America (NDCA) and when you belong to the NDCA there are rules and regulations that you abide by to compete in events. That’s where you get your rankings. That’s where I won my World Championships and so on. You have to have rules of certain things ““ there are too many for me to list but it has rules for lifts, it has rules for what the content of your dance should be and so on. Basically it gives you a guideline that you should not break. It needs to have a certain amount of element in there ““ just like skating. Pretty much it’s just like the skating system. So I think people are surprised that there’s this secret society of dancers and it’s worldwide and all connected.

    CS: Yeah, it’s global. It’s not just America. I think back to when I got married…my wife made me go to a Fred Astaire Dance Studio where I had to learn our first dance. It was choreographed and I thought it was a throwback to a bygone era but there were people there learning to dance themselves. I had never been in a situation like that.

    DOVOLANI: Fred Astaire Dance Studios have been around for over 60 years. And what’s amazing about them is that they have the system to be able to teach anybody how to dance. And that’s a beautiful thing. That’s why I call it a secret society because they have been able to exist under the radar. Many people who get married know that they have to learn to dance. This is something that is a part of our culture. Part of our etiquette. It is what identifies America, I think. It’s the icons like Fred Astaire or Gene Kelly that is in our history and connects us to World War II or even World War I. During those times it connected us with dance. It is just our culture. It’s about dance.

    CS: One thing you can help shed some like on is one of the connections I’ve drawn is that my teacher was from an Eastern Bloc country ““ what is it about the international appeal of dance? It seems to appeal to people overseas and they come here and it’s something that is prevalent in many studios I’ve been in.

    DOVOLANI: The one thing about that is that I call dance the universal language. It doesn’t matter what color you are, doesn’t matter what nationality you are, what part of the continent you are, it connects everybody. You can have somebody from China, from Japan, from Russia, the United States or vise versa and we immediately have something in common. Because as human beings we need to have something in common. And dance is something that can unite everybody. It is probably the most joyful thing that anybody can ever do and I feel that our country and everybody needs that more around them. That’s why dancing has become this craze all over the world. It connects people. It connects everyone. It doesn’t matter age, color, race”¦.doesn’t matter. Connects everyone.

    CS: You got your start a long time ago ““ 15-16 years ago. What appealed to you to pick it up?DOVOLANI: When I was a kid, I did folk dancing when I was three years old and when I came to the United States when I was 15 I was working for Fred Astaire Studios because I watched Fred Astaire as a kid growing up and I was in America and I went looking for a Fred Astaire Studio because that is where the best dancing was. And luckily for me in the state of Connecticut there was studio and I went there and immediately fell in love and I knew it was what I was meant to do. At 16 years old they hired me as a teacher which was quite an undertaking for me but something that I so thoroughly enjoyed that I just couldn’t imagine me not doing it. So now that I’ve found the connection of how to make a living at it, I just love going to work now.

    CS: When did you realize that you could do it and support yourself?

    DOVOLANI: For me it was right when I walked in because they could tell I was hungry for it and had a little talent for it and all that because of my dance background they thought they could mold me into a ball dancer. They showed me all the opportunities that ball dancing has. The Fred Astaire Dance Studios is a franchise. It has a way of being able to teach you, not only how to dance but how to support yourself through dance and that way you can dance for the rest of your life. Because dancing – in Europe when you are a dancer you are an artist. Here people that I’ve come across when I was younger would say “What do you do?” And I would say, “I dance.” And they would say, “No, how to you make a living?” And I would say, “I dance.” “No, how to you make money?” “I dance.” It’s hard for people to understand that, just like in anything else, in any business, dancing has become a dance-sport business. It involves dancing, it involves sport, it also involves business. Because, as you know, there is more and more demand for it and the teachers are getting to be able to teach just like tennis, or ice skating and so on. And it has become one of those crazes that everybody wants to be a part of.

    CS: And how did you get hooked-up with doing it on television?

    DOVOLANI: I did a movie with Jennifer Lopez and Richard Gere where I was also cast as a slick willy which was a mean guy but I trained for that movie for 9 months and I was also the current World Rhythm Champion so they really came after me and interviewed me to see if I would be the right candidate and they told me that my credentials I was the top teacher in the United States for three years in a row, they were like, “OK, we want this guy.” So, they went after me and they were hard to shake off.

    CS: So, you say you are also a teacher ““ what makes a good student? Some of these people who come on the show are obviously immediately pegged as going out the first or second round”¦.like I’m thinking Jerry Springer”¦these people who are bereft of any talent when it comes to dance, what do you need to make somebody a dancer? Is it as basic as just listening skills?

    DOVOLANI: Just someone who wants it. If these celebrities have desire…When desire meets opportunity and they work with the professionals we have on this show that’s all it takes to be a success. Even if they get kicked out the first show, they always learn something. I’ve been doing this for 18 years and I have yet to find anybody who cannot learn how to dance. So as long as they have the desire and they can walk ““ you’ll learn how to dance.

    CS: When I watch the show and see the cut scenes and watch the celebrities doing their routines and watching them failing and getting back up and doing it again ““ weekly ““ how many hours are celebrities (other than last night I heard someone only put 6 hours into it) whereas others worked all week on it.

    DOVOLANI: Jane and I put in 5-6 hours a day. Sometimes it has to do with a person’s ability. They need that many hours, some people don’t. It’s hard for someone to make the assumption that just because you put in the hours you are going to get the result. It’s the quality of hours that you put in. Some people need it ““ others don’t. As long as you go out there and perform to the best of your ability and give your mind and your body a chance to perform it properly, you’ll get the reward. But as far as rehearsing, these guys are going nuts – you got people who rehearse 250 hours so far to 180 hr. to 120 hrs. but it’s really amazing what they can accomplish regardless of the amount of hours they put in.

    CS: What is it about the dancing”¦I read a quote that ballroom dancing is all about the women ““ framing a picture, as it were. What, on an artistic level, when that celebrity hits the floor what should they be exuding?

    DOVOLANI: I feel it is the relationship. The man has to be the man. The woman has to be the woman and actually the man has to frame the woman, exactly. The man needs to be the strong part of the relationship or the man leads the woman across and shows her off. In any relationship…we know, the man is the man and the woman is the woman and dancing is just a reflection of that. And all this junk that the cha-cha is a man’s dance, the rumba is a woman’s dance, the swing is a together dance and on and on…it goes back and forth. There are parts where the man is highlighted and parts where the woman is highlighted but overall the man should always be the frame and the woman always be the picture because the woman is prettier. So you want to showcase her.

    CS: When you are finished with the season, do you go back to competing or anything along those lines?

    DOVOLANI: I just recently retired from competition. But what I’m going to do, is I’m the dance director of the Fred Astaire Dance Studios studio and I go around the country making sure the quality of the dance is up to par.

    CS: Are you always going to stay with the show?

    DOVOLANI: The show is amazing and if given the opportunity I would stay with the show. I love what I do and as long as I have the chance to do it I would keep doing it. It’s something…you never know. Obstacles come in the way but I don’t foresee that.

    CS: What is it when people are watching, I know my own daughter actually talks about the show with great regard, what are you hoping that people are getting out of it? In the beginning it was sort of a farce just to watch the celebrities but now it’s become a real competition.

    DOVOLANI: I hope people can escape from whatever trials and tribulations they have in life. I hope people get to enjoy for however long we have out there, the journey we have and the fact that we are sharing it with the country. And hopefully they are sitting there with their kids and joined together as families to get to share time together.

    CS: It’s a great show and I don’t understand why I’m so hooked on it or why I just can’t stop watching it.

    [Laughs]

    DOVOLANI: Thank you.

  • Trailer Park: This Page Intentionally Left Blank

    By Christopher Stipp

    Archives? Right Here”¦

    Instead of manning-up and actually going the emotionally hard route of being outrightly rejected by publishers, I’m rejecting them first and allowing you to give my entire book a preview, let you read the whole thing or, if you like, download the whole damn thing at no cost. Download and read my first book “Thank You, Goodnight” for FREE.

    With the kind of week I had I still managed to muster a little something new.

    This is about the only thing worth talking about in the last seven days:

    Go Sox…

    WRISTCUTTERS (2007)

    Director: Goran Dukic
    Cast:
    Patrick Fugit, Shannyn Sossamon, Shea Whigham, Tom Waits,
    Leslie Bibb
    Release: November 2nd, 2007
    Synopsis:
    Zia (Patrick Fugit), distraught over breaking up with his girlfriend, decides to end it all. Unfor- tunately, he discovers there is no real ending, only a run-down afterlife that is strikingly similar to his old one, just a bit worse. Discovering that his ex-girlfriend has also “offed” herself , he sets out on a road trip, with his Russian rocker friend, to find her. Their journey takes them through an absurd purgatory where they discover that being dead doesn’t mean you have to stop livin’.

    View Trailer:
    * Medium (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Really Positive. One of the things I really enjoy about trailers like this is that there’s a voice that someone found and went with it.

    I can think if all the ways in which someone could have taken an amalgam of scenes and turned this into an arty, obtuse trailer that I would immediately eschew in all its indulgence but you don’t get that here. This is a trailer that actually sustains itself on an interesting premise and tosses in enough weirdness that genuinely triggers interest and curiosity.

    I didn’t know quite what they were thinking with the title of the film, it’s awful, but when we enter this film’s universe we’re greeted with a breathy beat box as a soundtrack and a thin understanding as to why the young up and comer, now older and not so visible, Patrick Fugit is cleaning his place up before collapsing on the bathroom floor in a pool of his own blood; the dust bunny was an excellent detail.

    The premise is played quite well, slightly subdued, and when we see that this is a world inhabited by other people who have died as well and that it looks like earth, only a little different, it’s where all the interesting things start happening to Sir Fugit.

    We get introduced to the best friend, every movie needs one, and then are told that the girl who Patrick killed himself over”¦also killed herself shortly after he did. So, what are you going to do? Have a road trip in the underworld!

    You get the requisite giddy music to go along with the adventure that’s about to take place, as all the exciting things happen on the road, you get the mysterious (but hot, of course) wild card, played by Shannyn Sossamon, and you’re all set.

    What I really dig, though, about this trailer is that even though everything to this point was a little hackneyed with regard to the set up it is after the establishment of all this when it steps above the common. You’ve got an interesting mix of people and premise when Tom Waits of all people get involved.

    The movie seems less about the destination, of course, but the journey along the way deals with life as it used to be in order to define where these people are now. To say nothing, as well, about Will Arnett’s presence in this movie; dressed in white, playing the part of what seems like king, seeing Fugit and company stuck in some latter-day jail it’s bizarre and I love it.

    I dig the cheap joke at the end and the music that rides this trailer out but I think what’s important to see is that this seems like a flick that wants to take the road trip genre and give it a fresh twist. It’ll be interesting to see whether these people can.

  • Trailer Park: Henry Rollins

    By Christopher Stipp

    Archives? Right Here”¦

    Instead of manning-up and actually going the emotionally hard route of being outrightly rejected by publishers, I’m rejecting them first and allowing you to give my entire book a preview, let you read the whole thing or, if you like, download the whole damn thing at no cost. Download and read my first book “Thank You, Goodnight” for FREE.

    The first time I ever came across Henry Rollins was when I approached a co-worker who was listening to a cassette tape of Black Flag’s. I can’t remember the name of the album, the song or the rhythm or anything having to do with the band but I clearly remember being afraid, actually, of the aggression coming out of his headphones. The music was driving in a way that separated itself from the usual thrash metal I was accustomed to associating with punk. This was before I understood the intracity of lineages, styles and nuances of certain groups but one of the most appealing part of listening to Black Flag, as I would come to understand them, was that it gave rise to my interest in music that came from a visceral place. The message and thrust of the music was visceral.

    And now, with his notable appearance in the recently released WRONG TURN 2: DEAD END where he plays, well, himself and does it extraordinarily well, to his program in IFC aptly enough titled THE HENRY ROLLINS SHOW, to his current spoken word tour which you can check out right here Henry is all about keeping things varied. Of all the criticisms that could be leveled at a man who would take constant aim at politicians and their dishonest politicking Henry knows how to stay true to what makes him tick; he gets involved with what makes him feel comfortable. There’s no rhyme or reason to what he chooses but it’s all Henry. To be able and pick and choose and not feel like there is a need to be in this or that seems like a liberating position to be in and, right now, Rollins is in control of his own manifest destiny. Consider me jealous.

    Our conversation ranges from the political to the mundane but here’s the hook with any talk with Rollins: he has something to say. Too many times you can find yourself with someone who has nothing more than to chit-chat about irrelevancies. Henry has things on his mind and is not shy about taking them out of his wheelhouse to show you what he makes of them. He’s an absolute sharp fellow, one of the most well versed people I’ve ever had 20 minutes with, and he’s helped me understand my own ignorance about things with regard to the world around me.

    CS: First let me say it is really an honor to be able to talk to you.

    ROLLINS: Hey, thanks man.

    CS: I’ve loved the show since season one. Frankly, it’s one of the freshest film and entertainment programs out there. At its most basic it’s at least an elevation from Jay Leno or Letterman.

    ROLLINS: And I’ve been on Jay Leno before. Nice guy. But that’s not a pattern that interests me because it seems so contrived and so static. And, hopefully with our show, we are able to break out of that. We’re not sensitive and it’s a more laid back atmosphere. There’s no live audience so at least the guest can concentrate and so can I. And in a live audience you are always looking for the joke I guess and I’m so glad I’m not in that position. But, I wouldn’t do well in that environment.

    CS: Well, I really want to get to the core because I know I only have 20 minutes and I want to hit it hard.

    ROLLINS: Sure.

    CS: Myself ““ let me give you a little background is I’m a salesman by day for a newspaper and by night I write. I don’t get anytime to do as much reading as you do. It’s hard to keep up with things and but when I’m able to catch up with what you are thinking I’m actually blown away so I’m absolutely intrigued to find out what your thoughts are on the latest with what’s been happening in the last couple weeks – with Alberto Gonzalez, Ted Haggard and of course the Larry Craig thing.

    ROLLINS: It’s really interesting. But I think all that stuff it’s crazy. All these headlines coming across the papers, like, “Wow, this is an interesting week, tell me all about it.” But it’s not always the best news.

    Larry Craig to me is a peripheral issue that speaks of a bigger issue in that here’s an adult man caught in a restroom, maybe or maybe not soliciting another man for a sexual encounter. I wasn’t there”¦I don’t know, but let’s just pretend he’s a homosexual looking to meet somebody in a bathroom. And it could be that that’s the case and he comes from that older school in the 50’s homosexual where it had to be in the park ““ this clandestine rendezvous. It just goes to show you, that this type of suppression is not good for people. They need to sneak around. And like I said, if he is gay, look at the lie he is living. Even if he’s not gay, there are many men in America watching who do exactly what he’s accused to doing. They are married, they are straight on the outside but on the inside they are something else and they have been living a lie since whenever it is they knew they were gay. And it’s too bad in this land of the free that someone would have to kind of eat that hand grenade and not be who they are because I’m sure you are how you are and you don’t hide it. I’m a heterosexual. I’m on the big team, you know. And ads are geared towards me. Look at all the women showing cleavage. Look at Sports Illustrated. That’s been made for me. That’s for a guy who loves women. And I went all the way through school and I remember a couple of guys saying, “Maybe he’s gay.” He can hide it but she can’t hide it as well. It was interesting watching students and teachers react. Some were cool and some weren’t so cool.

    And it was too bad for the gay student when they weren’t so cool because you just had a bunch of guys staring at him calling him names. It must have been a really rotten way to go through school. The Larry Craig thing. No one seems to talk about the bigger problem: that we have a problem with homophobia in this country. But that was interesting.

    Gonzalez ““ he was so carrying the letter for this administration that he was laughing through his testimony:”I can’t remember”, “I gotta say this”, “They got my kid in the trunk ready to drive her down to the river if I don’t do this right.” It’s just interesting to watch on that level in front of C-span cameras. The way he was using English: “Who called you? You don’t remember? The call came from the White House. Who called you? Wow, you are not answering very simple, very direct questions which is pretty obvious. ”

    If you ever watch your girlfriend or whatever ““ everyone knows when you are lying. And then the fact that the country is watching and weren’t outraged on either side of he aisle. If it was some Democrat up there I’d be saying, “You bastard, tell the truth, man.”

    CS: There actually was a news program that actually talked about the fact that every news organization used every other word but “liar”.

    ROLLINS: Yeah, “You are not being truthful. You are not being clear.”

    CS: Do you think that the word is a value judgment, as some reporters have said, or do you think it is OK to flat out call a spade a spade without it being perceived as a childish, cheap”¦..

    ROLLINS: I think there is probably a great desire by the big news guys to not be so black and white to give themselves some wiggle room and to not offend these people they want to put on the Situation Room some day in the future. I also think the Bush administration is very cowed and intimidated by the US media. Because if you ever watch news or listen to news from other countries, like the BBC World News, they are just way more abrupt. They just go, look that, it looked like a lie to me. They just don’t have time to kiss ass like we do.

    CS: Maybe this has always been a problem, maybe it’s me just getting older, but why don’t people care? Why doesn’t anybody care?

    ROLLINS: Well, some people care. And I’ve been asked that before.

    Here’s my answer: I think a lot of people who would be accused of not caring ““ they don’t have the time or the luxury of learning the information so they can be angry about it. And if you wanted to get into a conversation with someone who has three kids, not enough money and who works a shift and a half everyday trying to bring home the proverbial bacon. You say if you read this book or check out that book, the guy looks at you bleary eyed and says, “I got three kids and a wife, this is my crap car I don’t own, I don’t have time to read. I haven’t read a book for 5 years.”

    “What do you think about the news? What do you think about what Seymour Hersh said in the Times…” and he says, “Pal, I look at the USA Today in the lunchroom and read the Sports section. ” If they get the news maybe on the radio while they are going through traffic if they listen to it…so they don’t have the time.

    In this country, Americans are hard working people. And a lot of times, knowing a thing or two is almost coming from a vantage point of luxury. Like me, I guess I’m doing pretty good. I have the time to read those big books and chew through them the best I can. I study history and read this and that and download that article and I read it but I don’t have any kids or a dog and I will take the weekend and I’ll spend it reading this stuff because I can afford to. A lot of people can’t. So I think a lot of people ““ it’s not always apathy it’s like, “OK, nothing’s on fire, nothing’s blowing up, the President says the economy is strong and maybe that means me. And if I don’t want to do my job right now, I mean my kids crying and I think that’s the problem in America. ”

    There is not enough time to know this stuff. That’s why people seem to be angry about gas prices than the things that’s chewing up their countrymen, that would be Iraq. And gas prices went up fifteen cents. When I see gas prices go up I think about what it means globally and what it means for America in the world a year from now. I don’t think today I just spent $4 more at the gas pump. Like it’s not an immediate concern. I look at the bigger picture because I’m privileged to have the vantage point. And to me, at this point, it is just a privilege. Which sucks. It should be if only the salt of the earth, the backbone of America people, you know, Wal-Mart enthusiasts, could be more conversant in global warming and water shortages in other countries then they could have a genuine concern about it because I don’t think any American wants any other person to suffer ““ themselves or strangers or anyone else ““ that’s not how America is wired, I don’t think.

    I think people are absolutely altruistic if you give them the chance. But I think that’s what really plagues this country and I think some people have really jumped upon it and use it as an opportunity ““ to propagandize.

    CS: Is that why a fifth of Americans can’t locate America on a map?

    ROLLINS: Yeah, stuff like that. I love pulling out a map and finding countries. But you can catch me on a whole lot of stuff ““ I’m not any genius. But I work at it. I try to learn stuff everyday.

    CS: You brought up a point about the people who are on the front line of this war. How did it affect you when you did the USO Tour when you go to these places and see these troops?

    ROLLINS: The most emotionally affecting stuff of the USO Tour is the hospital visits at Walter Reed Medical Hospital in Bethesda. Those are the hardest visits I make. When we’re out amongst troops at a base, everything is moving , and “Hey man, couldn’t wait to see you” and all that but when you go to the hospital, it’s room after quiet room and you make these visits and this guy is missing two legs, this guy is missing an arm, this guy is missing an arm and a leg. It’s like very rare you meet someone who is completely intact who has a back injury. And you meet those people and it’s, “Yeah, I threw my back out I’m here recuperating.” Well, OK. Then in the next room the guy’s forehead has been replaced because it was blown off and those are the hardest visits because you see these people half your age. I’m 46. They are 20 something and sometimes the whole family is crammed into that room. Why can’t they stay in a hotel? They are trying to make it work ““ to be with their boy and keep the job and keep the home and you see what this is doing to their lives and how these people had to make these incredible adjustments to how they do their thing to live their lives because their son, their husband, their dad, is missing limbs or brutally mangled.

    You see how amazing the cutting edge of technology is as far as what a surgeon can do re-constructively. These guys get the most amazing care and they deserve it, of course. But it’s hard to take. Do that for 5 to 6 hours and get back to me. And I’ve been to those hospitals many times and hopefully I’ll be there in early October. Whenever I’m in DC, where I come from, I’ll let the USO know a week in advance. “I can give you half the day here or here.” But if you need me, put me in coach, I’m ready to play. And sometimes they can arrange it sometimes they don’t need me. So it’s like a wait and see and they let me know a week before. So it’s made the military, all those voices, a very personal thing to me because now I get their letters. I meet them at shows. Like some guy will write me, “Hey, I met you in Iraq a few years ago and you are coming to my town” ““ hey, give me your name and I’ll put you on the guest list. I always put them on the guest list. But that military ““ of the fifty shows coming up I have military coming to at least 15 so far. And more will write as the tour goes on I’m sure. “Hey you hooked up my buddy man, can you hook me up? ” Yeah, sure. And I’ve been doing that for years now.

    CS: This new tour for the fall ““ we can at least talk about that for a moment. Is there any sort of core ““ molten core – around which you are building this tour?

    ROLLINS: I usually have one or two centerpiece stories but I have meat on the plate and I have the potato and the vegetable. So a lot of my big centerpiece stories are usually travel stories. Fly from this country to that country to that country and that was my big journey. Last tour the big centerpiece story was the Trans Siberian Express train ride I took from Moscow to Vladivostok. Again, it’s travel stories as it is usually. I get out there in the world, see a thing or two, learn a thing or two and this year it’s when I went to Iran earlier this year and recently I just returned from Syria and Lebanon. And those were interesting places to go.

    At least one of them is on the Axis of Evil and when I came back from Syria and Lebanon the customs people at the San Francisco International Airport marched me into a room and asked me a whole lot of questions as to why I went to Damascus and Syria. “Why? I’m just curious. And if you notice, there is a legal visa in my passport and I’ve done nothing wrong.” And, after a while, I was asking them more questions than they were asking me. Basically, “What’s your problem?” “Why are you asking me these dopey questions?” And then, they were like, “OK, you can leave.” I said, “What’s with you guys?”

    CS: What was the country like?

    ROLLINS: Well, it’s a pretty hot country. You could melt butter on your head it’s so hot. Their government ““ is there a government. Want to get into that topic with me? No? Good, cause I’ll sit here ’til my next flight and talk about it. Don’t tell me we aren’t any better than some of these places. So it was just an interesting bit of language. “Here’s my suitcase, here’s my hard drive, search me”¦” So, they said, “You can go. ” I guess they researched me and said I’m no threat. Which I’m not. But the people I met in those countries were fantastic. Friendly. I’d ask, “What do you think of America? Syrinese and Lebanese are “Like America”¦like you guys.” Oh yeah. I walked all over Beirut and Damascus and no one said get out of here. No one looked at me twice. In Beirut I was invited by the cab driver to come over and meet his wife and join us for some coffee and we’ll hang out. That’s why I came here to meet someone like you. Just people. The whole family.

    CS: Do you think that kind of openness that kind of laissez faire ““ come as you go – still exists in America or is this a culture that is now based on fear?

    ROLLINS: No, I think you have some areas that are very stressed. Some cities that are very wound tight. But there’s a lot of parts of America where they don’t lock their doors. Essentially America is filled with very good people ““ some very trying times there is no doubt about that but by and large Americans are very cool. It’s just that cities perpetuate their own myths in a way and that’s what we’re up against. That’s why the bad neighborhoods are still pretty bad because some of the inhabitants groove on the fact that that it’s a bad neighborhood. And it might be somewhat resistant if you went in with your school books and your laptops.

    So America, in my opinion ““ I’ve gotten arguments about this. I think America, at least parts of it, likes to perpetuate our own myths. We sometimes take the legend of ourselves as much as we like the reality or sometimes we go for the myth of ourselves quicker than what it really is. We have a culture that grew up in the movie theater. I think you can come and go as you please for the most part in America. I think it’s probably a little different than it used to be post 9/11. I’ve noticed America in some places there’s been a shift in the last 6 years. And when the going gets rough, the average gets conservative. You know that. And so there is a lot of good people who are sincerely terrified of things and make them jump to some stupid conclusions. Like we better take that Mosque down, yes, that will solve it.

    CS: It’s almost like an adolescence…A phase that we’re going thorough?

    ROLLINS: I don’t think America is used to getting attacked. That’s for sure. Every other country in the world can tell you, yea, we got invaded. Alexander came here, Attila the Hun came here, the IRA did this thing here. Every other country has been blown up, shot, raised, invaded, pilfered but not America. Then 9/11 happened and all of a sudden everyone said we got to…it was a wake up call. For those who travel abroad and have a sense of history 9/11 may not have been as surprising as it was to some.

    CS: I don’t think it was. To be frankly honest, I don’t think it was. Like you said, people who pay attention to things that are happening in the world, there are other countries that have it a lot worse.

    ROLLINS: And more often in the last century. And they can look back over centuries ““ this is our history. It goes back to…whatever. In America, the paint is still drying here. We are very new. And for a new country we sure seem to be hell bent on telling other cultures how it is. Like the young energetic kid at the dinner table with the grown ups saying, “Here’s how it’s going to be. ” And it’s amazing how tolerant the elders have been.

    CS: But how does someone like yourself, and again I’m going back to yourself and how you get your own news in a day…A: How do you keep up with the most accurate things that are going on with Fox obviously having it’s own slant, CNN having it’s own slant, etc…how do you keep up with that and B) At the end of the day can you at least formulate for me if President Bush is the worst President we’ve ever had?

    ROLLINS: OK, well where I get my information is I love to read printed journalism I like to read stuff on the Internet. I like to listen to the radio and hear other people talk, different politicians. I try to find non agenda journalists. I have to read and read between the lines. I cross reference and think “What’s the motivation? Why does America go into this country and do that? What’s the motivation?” Just follow the money and you can save yourself a lot of aggravation and a lot of time. So, with that in mind, that’s how I read the news. I put it all through a business filter.

    Now, as far as how history will judge George W. Bush, I think he has shifted more funds and moved more mountains in his 6 years or soon to be 7 years in office than any president in my recollection. It was very different landscape of America before he came to town and America is a very different place. Americans live differently, he’s taken an amazing amount of money out of the public coffers and shifted to private companies, like billions of dollars, and on our watch and in your face so he’s been very successful and I think he’s done a lot of damage.

    And, as far as the worst President, yeah, maybe that will be George W. Bush considering how many generations it’s going to take to undo what he has done. We can rectify a lot of problems quickly if we withdrew from some places in the world. If we pull out they say, “OK, cool”¦that’s all we want was for you to back off.” The genius thing about this administration is the phrase that if we don’t fight them over there we are going to have to fight them over here. And that just keeps the thing going and I think it’s completely untrue. If you stop fighting them over there the thing just kind of ends and drops off.

    CS: Thank you, Henry, for your time. I look forward to seeing you perform live.

    ROLLINS: I love doing these shows. I really love it. Love being up there. It’s fun.

  • Trailer Park: Chris Ryall

    By Christopher Stipp

    Archives? Right Here”¦

    Instead of manning-up and actually going the emotionally hard route of being outrightly rejected by publishers, I’m rejecting them first and allowing you to give my entire book a preview, let you read the whole thing or, if you like, download the whole damn thing at no cost. Download and read my first book “Thank You, Goodnight” for FREE.

    He gave me my first opportunity to write.

    Apart from the clever quips that I could make regarding whether Chris Ryall’s decision to allow me to talk at great length about the one thing I still love about making the trek to see a movie, the trailers, was a good one I cannot help but just feel in awe of the level of intelligence Chris brought to a site called MoviePoopShoot.com.

    Whether it was his One Hand Clapping columns or his weekly quest to skewer all things television there was a quality control about the site that always made me want to be a better writer. It didn’t help that when I tried to spread out a little bit in the column that PR flunkies would ostensibly hang up on a guy saying he was from a place called Poop Shoot but Chris was always there to offer advice and was always physically quick to turn around every…single…e-mail with blazing quickness.

    Chris has now found himself in the envious job of being the Editor-In-Chief of IDW Publishing which, among other things, has put out 30 DAYS OF NIGHT, POPBOT, SCARFACE: DEVIL IN DISGUISE, TRANSFORMERS and scads of other titles that aren’t your daddy’s superhero books. He’s made it great to be a fan of comic books that aren’t nearly as obtuse as the stranger, art for art’s sake, independents that you can find choking any respectable comic book stand. I’ve found more hits than misses coming out of the IDW showroom and the level of artistry that graces some of its pages is genuinely top shelf.

    I was able to talk to Chris prior to his appearance at the San Diego Comic-Con and it was a conversation that certainly spans many of the titles that IDW has been publishing lately but this was a conversation that I hope illuminates a little about the day-to-day operations an EIC has to go through in making sure the product that is released is good and how it’s fun to be king when you’re able to visit the set of 30 DAYS OF NIGHT on the underside of the world and witness the comic book finally coming to life.

    We got to the point of talking about how the Comic-Con has inflated to a gigantic, almost sentient, beast:

    RYALL: It’s all getting really ridiculous.

    Christopher Stipp: It is. And you’re obviously going to be part of the ridiculousness. What’s your schedule like?

    RYALL: My schedule is horrible. I’m doing a couple signings but I’m doing three different panels and have non-stop meetings for four to five days. The usual….Nonstop hustle from one to the next.

    CS: Is it an enjoyable experience for you at this point?

    RYALL: Well, it’s fun being there and everything but”¦it’s fun talking to people and I like doing signings and all but you just don’t have enough time to see some of the things I want to see. There’s not enough time to talk to people. I’m able to talk to people for 30 seconds then I have to run off. I don’t like that. That’s why nights are more fun. You can spend more time with people. You don’t have to run from meeting to meeting. It’s alright. It should be a good one for us because we are just coming off Transformers and we have some big announcements to make while we’re there as well.

    CS: I have a whole lot of questions for you. And that’s one of them. Are you benefiting from how well TRANSFORMERS has done in the past weeks?

    RYALL: Yes, it’s been great for us. It’s been our best year ever. We got to go into places that we’ve never been to before like Target with our book which is pretty cool. Transformers has been pretty good for everybody so far.

    CS: I read that in previous interviews….you guys seemed to be able to leverage that ““ the properties being attached to films ““ 30 DAYS OF NIGHT really took off when people were starting to get attached to it and the same thing with TRANSFORMERS. In your opinion, if the movie didn’t do as well, would this”¦.were things in place before or is the book doing as well it is because of the success of TRANSFORMERS?

    RYALL: They were in place before. Like when you buy a book at bookstores like Borders or Barnes and Noble ““ those books are returnable. So if the movie didn’t do that well then those books would have come back to us. I think because the movie did do so well, made people want to actually pick them up. We did a special one for Target and that one actually sold out in a couple weeks…We gave away a million and a half copies of the comic of the video game and gave away millions at movie theaters. So, yeah, all those things have just been stuff that we never really had an opportunity to do before on that scale. It’s kinda nice.

    CS: Absolutley. And I’m curious to know on that level, when you are taking a property as wide as you have on uncharted waters, how do you tip toe into it and determine what would work or try ““ how do those decisions get made in the end?

    RYALL: I think the cool thing is that we didn’t even over think anything. We were like, hey, the movie is coming. Let’s do a prequel and explain some things that were referenced in the screen play or allude to in the movie but don’t necessarily have time to cover in the movie. Let’s do a whole prequel that will answer these questions and explain why Bumblebee can only talk to the radio and that kind of stuff. We sorta jumped in from there. If we do this four part epic story that leads into the movie and then do the movie itself it just creates a huge massive epic Transformers story. And the cool thing about that was we were in the stores in February for the start of the prequel so you got the first official look at the characters and the story line.

    CS: It was weeks and weeks before”¦It was a nice little push to at least get people ready for it.

    RYALL: And I think it paid off a bit more after you saw the movie and saw the stuff we referenced in the movie but then if you go back and read the prequel after you see the movie, it’s like “Oh yeah…that’s what that was””¦.that’s what they were talking about.

    CS: So you were using the screenplay in small bites, here and there, to help bolster the storyline?

    RYALL: Yeah. They gave us the screenplay then I went through and developed this four part plan on what we’d like to do with the prequel. Got on the phone with Miramax and got the screen writers involved so everyone had their input involved, do this do that, make sure this happens”¦it was very collaborative which was cool for a project on that scale it can be difficult but it wasn’t the case this time. It was fairly smoothly done for as big a project as it was. You have Hasbro on one side, then you have Paramount, then you have the filmmakers and the writers”¦.there is potential for all that to be egos or different things people want to happen but there was none of that. Everybody was just working toward telling a story. It was pretty fun and very gratifying thing to do.

    CS: That’s amazing. Do you credit that to anything in particular why everyone was just able to go forward instead of having Hasbro being a bureaucratic pain in the ass or the screen writers taking umbrage with something nitpicky?

    RYALL: I would like to think it was because the proposed outline was so solidly done, but I have no idea. We were just so excited about getting stuff out there and making it work on every level. And I think at some point because we had been doing it for a year and a half there was some trust level, at least with Hasbro and also with Paramount”¦..as far as the comics go it was always our thing so having that previous history, doing the books gave us a trust that we never had before.

    CS: And I think during the proposal stage you said before there were other people with more money than you had in getting a licensing agreement and it was all about the quality of the work that made you guys the obvious choice to pick”¦is that the way you approach the proposal process? I mean do you have to play up to your strengths and hope that money just isn’t the bottom line?

    RYALL: Yeah, I think just even getting the licenses we’ve shown that we’ve done things like this before and even though we weren’t the biggest publisher we could show that, unlike a huge publisher we could make the property our flagship title whereas Transformers was never going to be a priority for someone making all the Batman, Spider-Man books first. We could, though, put all our energy into it to make it the best we can. So, all those things combined, I think, a year and a half later, Hasbro seems pretty happy at the things that we’ve done so it’s worked out much better than you would have assumed it would from the start.

    CS: As Editor-In-Chief, when you have a property like that, myself growing up in comics I’ve been privy to a whole bunch of crappy comic adaptations of films, what’s important to you when you get a property in your hands ““ what’s at the forefront of your mind? What are you thinking?

    RYALL: First thing always is, “Do we like it?”

    I would never want to do…I don’t want to single anything out that I hate, like American Idol…A big easy money making kind of thing that I can’t stand because it would just take over your life. It’s just work. So we think, “OK, do we like it, do we have an idea for it, what do we think we can do with it?” Like, with Transformers, we have the luxury of looking at what’s been done before. What do we think worked before? What did the fans think worked before? What didn’t work? Then we can just base our plan off of not only what we think that we’d like to do with it but what the fans said they want to see.

    CS: So you’ve actually taken that into account as well?

    RYALL: Oh yeah. Before we put our whole plan together for Transformers I spent two months lurking on some of the bigger Transformers message boards just learning what they had to say, what they like and what they don’t like. It’s certainly an opinionated crowd. But that’s cool. What mass comics worked for them. It was a good basis ““ a good starting point.

    CS: I liked the GI Joe and Transformers story arc circa 1980 something…

    (Laughs)

    RYALL: Some of it was done well some not so well but”¦.

    CS: I was going to ask working in the medium now being Editor-In-Chief are you more critical of the products being sold to kids ““ not even just to kids ““ to comic consumers being more critical of what’s out there?

    RYALL: Completely. It’s hard because I know a lot of the people that are creating that stuff too so now I would be more inclined to say hey he’s a nice guy …he probably didn’t mean to hack it. But some of the stuff is so shameless. I’m sure people could look at us and say the same type of things. But it does give you a more critical eye for that type of things.

    CS: And you are “hands-on” especially with your adaptations of LAND OF THE DEAD, SHAUN OF THE DEAD, Great Big Secret Show, and now with BEOWULF, I’m curious to know I have not seen an editor in chief take on such an active role with adapting as you have. What’s it been like to try and translate a lot of these projects into actual comic books themselves.

    RYALL: The cool thing of just being in this role is allows me the luxury of picking and choosing what I really want. So if something comes along that I just love and I really want to do, I can opt to do it. I do try and make sure not to take work away from other people because I don’t want to be selfish and just do things myself. But some of them ““ like Transformers was pretty cool and Clive Barker, I have a relationship with him ““ it just makes more sense when you are dealing constantly with the studios like Transformers…it’s just easier to deal with it yourself than try and explain it after the fact to writers so that’s kind of my thought process.

    I got to say the Clive Barker thing was a bit daunting because it was almost an 800 page book to adapt to 20 comic book pages ““ I guess it’s more than that ““ 22 pages times 12 so I guess 240 pages. But anyway, it’s a lot to condense a novel into a comic book. Movies are a bit more easier because they are set up more visually and the scenes kind of follow the same, whether it’s a movie, screen play or comic book. Try to figure out the breaking point ““ the cliff hangers is the challenge of comic books. Books are a bit more of challenge because the visuals aren’t fully developed and you have to be a bit more presumptuous, like I’m going to cut out the Clive Barker’s dialog because it’s not needed here but then who the heck am I to decide to cut out Clive Barker’s words?

    But like anything you have to adapt it to the form that it’s going to be presented and he understands that more than anyone because he’s had his works adapted to comics and moves and each one is different you have to make sure it works for the format. The books, the comics we can condense things here and there and if he’s happy with it then I am and hopefully others will be to. We try not to disrespect the material.

    CS: But now you don’t have the author of Beowulf to go back to. How’s that been?

    RYALL: Neil Gaiman and Roger Avery are the authors of the screen play.

    CS: So, you are basing it on the screenplay then?

    RYALL: Yes. Fully movie based.

    CS: How’s that been? Have you been working with Gaiman back and forth on your adaptation?

    RYALL: Not so much back and forth. I did send over some of the art and showed him what we were doing and he said he loved what we’re doing so that’s good enough for me. If I don’t disappoint the people who originated the material then I feel like I’ve done my job. And he’s the captain of it. 200,000 copies of an 8 page promo to give everybody at the show for free so they can see how it starts anyway. And it’s fun. I’ve never really done any sword and sorcerer stuff before.

    CS: Is it difficult to switch mediums? I’m not a big sci-fi guy myself but when you get into an area that you’ve never dabbled in before is there any time when you say, oh I’d be good enough to do this or”¦.

    RYALL: I never really thought that. I’m not steeped in it in the way some of the fans are so, in a way, I hope I handle the dialog properly. Especially with the prequel because we developed it on our end and not based on an adaptation so it was like uncharted territory there. But I will say that Zombies Vs. Robots is such a different world. It’s so much easier. Because it’s mine. I don’t have to worry about disappointing anybody if I screw it up.

    CS: I read that when you do at something, when you take control of a project, you are really personally invested. You are not just writing for the sheer joy of writing and you are really concerned about getting things right. Do you think that that’s something that people have said about your work that at the very least it’s an honest adaptation?

    RYALL: I don’t know. I’ve never really heard that from people ““ but I guess I have with the Clive Barker stuff that I was true to the material and I handled it the way they wanted to see it handled. With that Clive book, it came out in ’89, it’s been some people’s favorite book for 20 years or what have you. Those people have seen that book in their heads for two decades so now we are actually putting a definitive visual down on paper, if it doesn’t measure up to what they expect it to be you really have a chance to disappoint them.

    But, so far, everyone seems to be pretty happy. I try not to do too many of these because I really want to take the time and be sure it’s up to the best of my ability. Plus I try to hand-pick the best artist on these things which also helps. It helps carry a script if you got Gabriel Rodriquez or Ashley Wood working for you.

    CS: Did you ever make it to the TRANSFORMERS set?

    RYALL: No.

    CS: No, as in, they didn’t let you go?

    RYALL: No, I tried to go but it didn’t work out.

    CS: Well, one that you did make it on that I’m really interested about is 30 DAYS OF NIGHT.

    RYALL: Yeah, that was cool. That was a lot of fun.

    CS: Was it just as a spectator or did you get to offer any input into anything?

    RYALL: No. They were well into the shoot at that point. Who am I to be telling David Slade what he should be doing? He was showing up and being respectful to the material. So we just were able to sit back and watch the process without getting involved or anything like that. He had it well in hand anyway so he didn’t really need me getting in the way I think.

    CS: And what was that experience like seeing something that year’s ago was just ink and paper. It must have been ““ this stuff being right in front of you live and people trying to bring it to live action. How was that?

    RYALL: The coolest part was watching with Ben Templesmith…Because he was there with me and it was his book. He did the visuals and everything like that. It was kind of like bringing your kids to Disneyland for the first time ““ watching through they eyes. Just watching him and seeing how amazed he was by seeing his talent come to life and seeing character shirt designs come to life, he was so ecstatic to see something he did come to life. It was cool for me to see it but I would imagine it would be more fun for him to see something he created brought to life like that.

    CS: And David is a curious choice as a director. I think he can be credited with capturing the most agonizing castration scene ever put to cellular.

    RYALL: There’s a horror movie for you.

    CS: So who ultimately gave that green light to him?

    RYALL: Oh, I don’t know. I know somebody talked to him but I wasn’t involved in that part of the process. But I know somebody really liked his work on HARD CANDY.

    CS: Great movie.

    RYALL: Yeah, it was a pretty uncomfortable movie.

    CS: But I think that’s the kind of guy you want. The guy who can make something out of something that’s not really there.

    RYALL: Yeah, he also built characters in that movie too. So his ability to handle characters and work with actors to that degree, the thing’s got more potential to be more than just a slasher horror movie. Good characters.

    CS: It’s also has a great trailer. I’ve been wanting something good and it’s the little little things. It’s the finger on the record…the little details. And the vampire’s face ““ the actual physicality of a vampire is something I have not seen before.

    RYALL: Yeah, it was fun to watch that on the set. Danny Houston was so in character as the lead vampire. It was fun to watch the makeup after they are just sitting there all eating salads with their fangs”¦.

    (Laughs)

    CS: I listen to Michael Chabon talking about ““ this is a lengthy question so sit down for just a moment. Michael was talking about his new book and somehow they got on the topic of comic books and he has mentioned that one of the best stories he read growing up are the ones that took like Superman what have you and put another type of reality on top of that. Superman goes to bizarre world or dual layered and it got me thinking that when I saw that Ben is coming back with the WWII 30 Days of Night that he’s taking the already fictional world of these vampires and he’s putting on an additional reality of WWII ““ any reason why Ben went with that time period with these vampires or is it just something he’s always been thinking about doing?

    RYALL: Well, I know that he’s been talking about that for years. He’s sort of a history buff ““ he’ll tell you about thousands and thousands of troops that marched into Russia and just disappeared. They say because of extreme cold and everything else they faced but there was a chance that vampires had killed them so he thought that playing off the fact that it was based in the circle of fact and the story paralleled the original 30 Days so it was a fun idea for him. I know he didn’t want to do something different. He’s turned into quite a good writer. He’s got a good wicked sense of humor. He’s turned in some good stuff now.

    CS: How does Ben try to keep the genre fresh? You talk about vampires ““ just look at how many comic books out there are based on vampires. How does he look at his role as a creator to keep these things from becoming just ho-hum?

    RYALL: I think he stepped back from doing the 30 Days the last two to three years because he was worried about that too. He didn’t want to get to the point where he did so much of that that people just take it for granted or only did it for the vampire guy. So he was trying to do other things like Hatter M and Wormwood to try and break out a bit. I think now he can go back and revisit this world and be effective especially when he has a good idea, like he did in this one. People won’t take it for granted. He’ll put something different out there ““ something exciting and new.

    CS: I read in a recent interview about the proliferation of people who are downloading scanned comics files ““ is it really something that companies should be moving toward or investigating or is it something that is almost like Chicken Little”¦the sky’s is falling because people aren’t buying the comics, they’re reading them on-line. Are people really downloading at an incredible pace for publishers to start thinking about”¦

    RYALL: I just want to say no because I personally don’t want to read comics on-line ““ anything more than just a page strip I find obnoxious to read but I think you can’t ignore big numbers like big torrent sites where there are hundreds and thousands of people downloading comics. So I certainly think it is something that some of us will have to figure out what to do with it.

    I don’t know that there is a quick settle ““ I know we’ve all gambled here and there as far as offering up downloadable content but I think it’s still not formatted in a way that is all that palatable, so I don’t know. It something that people just shouldn’t ignore but it’s hard for me because I like to have something tangible in my hands. I’d like to think that they wouldn’t replace the comics themselves any more than they would replace books or magazines but I know there is a growing number of people out there that don’t think along the same lines so we are looking into that, as to what the best kind of approach would be.

    CS: And certainly in your job as Editor-in-Chief for the last couple years.

    RYALL: It’s been three years now.

    CS: How have you ““ what has been your keys to success these last three years? You’ve obviously never run a comic book company before ““ how did you learn as you go?

    RYALL: It’s not a whole lot different ““ there’s a lot more deadline pressure but I’ve always kept deadline pressure on myself to come up with new content everyday. That did help a lot as far as just dealing with a lot of different people, a lot of different deadlines, so all that is on a grander scale now. It helps to have a background in comics. I think I have an affinity for it so it makes it a lot less feel like work.

    CS: And certainly one of the things that I will publicly say that I admire about you is that you were constantly producing on a deadline whether it was One Hand Clapping or the TV listings that you set the example for everyone else on MoviePoopShoot.com that deadlines can be hit no matter how busy you think you are. Do you think that’s translated to what you are doing over at IDW?

    RYALL: I hope so. The one thing that I realize here is that it’s no longer a 9 to 5 job. I pretty much work day and night, and mornings and weekends, year round. But the reason I do it is to stay ahead of these things but also because of the freelancers are working at all times during the day trying to get things done on deadline. I don’t want them out there alone. I want to be accessible to them. I want them to know that we are all doing stuff together no matter what time of the day. So, I try to do the same thing ““ try to set the example. I’m right there with you. Even though no one but me would know that I’m late, I make it a point to never be late just because I think people might be telling somebody else to get there stuff in on time – on deadline. But yes, I put all this undue pressure on myself that I probably don’t have to but it helps me anyway.

    CS: And the final question to people out there, you have seen some great success in the last few years but looking ahead where does IDW see itself evolving or does it need to evolve at all, just happy being what it is?

    RYALL: I think you have to evolve. When I first started here we did some license stuff and we did a lot of horror stuff that I’ve tried the last three years to help us branch out more than just pigeon holed and I think we need to keep doing that sort of thing. Stuff that’s more kid friendly make sure that we have stuff for different audiences. If you’re ready for horror, we’ve got that, if you’re younger and your sensibilities are younger then we have stuff for you there. Just proceeding that way and vary the content for different people. I want to write more creative rock stuff ““ that’s my big goal. I like to do adaptation but I have some other stuff that I want to try and get to next year.

  • Trailer Park: WEIRDSVILLE

    By Christopher Stipp

    Archives? Right Here”¦

    Instead of manning-up and actually going the emotionally hard route of being outrightly rejected by publishers, I’m rejecting them first and allowing you to give my entire book a preview, let you read the whole thing or, if you like, download the whole damn thing at no cost. Download and read my first book “Thank You, Goodnight” for FREE.

    Two things and then we can get on with it:

    1. Can I get an amen for Scott Speedman?

    2. Is anyone else grooving on the HDNet experience like me?

    I think I would be totally in the clear by saying that my DirectTV service has been a lot like dealing with DMV and that their crap ass set top HD digital recorder sucks harder than a ho who’s been aching for some crack rock (True, that whole ho/crack thing is an analogy that should have died somewhere in the 90s after meth hit the scene but that’s neither here nor there). The long and short of it is that DirecTV has been jerking me around for quite some time in getting their proprietary HD unit to work. I’ve had to send back, no joke, no less than four boxes which invariably found a way to melt itself down. After begging and pleading for their headquarters to make nice with the TiVo people, not only am I a small shareholder but DirecTV’s original non-HD TiVo boxes rock so very hard, and me being unsure what could have driven DirecTV to spurn the digital dukes of all that’s splendid in the world I was nearly at the point with their customer no-service of canceling my programming altogether.

    That is until I was made whole again and found a little channel called HDNet. I’m still not quite sure who is creating the playlist over there at that channel, whether those of you with Dish can see it as well, but apart from the visually gripping selections they have been rolling out some excellent movies. Not that these are any run-of-the-mill cable flicks. No, these are first run films that get their bow in movie theaters and then get played on HDNet, prior to the movie coming out on DVD shortly thereafter.

    From FAY GRIM, DIGGERS, CLOSING ESCROW, CASHBACK and now WEIRDSVILLE the amount of good quality fare has extended beyond the much more publicized and hyped experiment of Steven Soderbergh’s BUBBLE. The model of offering the opportunity to not have to pay one penny extra to experience theater entertainment without me having to do anything more than pushing that big red R button on my remote so I can watch it later.

    I have to be honest and say that the experiment works. Not so much in the regard that I need to now go and buy the DVD (I have a DVD recorder hooked up to ye ol’ digital HD unit) but now I feel like now there’s a conduit between me and those making some really quality films where once there wasn’t one. I live fairly far from my local art house, and Lord only knows that for me to get my ass in the car and haul down to ASU, a good 40 minutes, to see a movie like DAY WATCH is a bit of a hassle, and to be able and see quality goods every now and then only emboldens my opinion that, yes, there needs to be a new distribution model in place to accommodate picky buttheads like me who don’t want to physically go somewhere to see a movie.

    1st run flicks are taking a beating from the home video market from those who simply shrug off every new weekend of entertainment choices because they already have it in their cranium that they can stave off the hunger for the theater by sitting on their hands 3 or 4 months, weeks in some cases, to see the same movie in the comfort of their home. I honestly don’t think that the dialog in people’s minds is that specific but I believe the reports that DVD sales are doing great business only because individuals have figured out that the ever shrinking window between theatrical and rental is worth waiting out. I also don’t believe people necessarily have grown to hate the experience of going to a film, I like being able to physically go out and make time to see one, but you now in the 21st century have to weigh convenience or comfort. People are increasingly being in favor of convenience a whole lot more, regardless of how many times you really want to be able and see TRANSFORMERS on the big screen. Your set up at home could probably beat the piss out of some weeks old print that has been through the projector a few times over; even if it’s digital, my friend, your HD-DVD or Blu-Ray impresses beyond comprehension if you consider picture quality.

    I’d like to think that my extra dollars spent on HD programming is helping to finance and support the efforts of WEIRDSVILLE after seeing it this weekend. The movie is spectacularly well done, Scott Speedman, despite my best efforts to really break bad on the dude, is a delight and the story is crazy enough to make any night at home a more enjoyable one. Would I have felt this way if I caught the movie in the theater? I honestly don’t know but I will say that not paying for something definitely makes me critique an effort a lot more than if I spent a ten spot on it; makes me wonder what would happen to many movie reviews if the reviewer had to pay for the films that he or she commented on without the prospect of being reimbursed for it. Too many variables but I will say this: regardless of how many people actually read this screed I have to recommend that anyone with an ounce of interest in film look and see what is coming down the pike from HDNet. The first run films that are now available to everyone could really help get the word out of these small independent pictures that were wise enough to embrace the new model for exhibiting their wares. The brave new digital world needs to come in contact with other films like this and make them available to people who have evolved with the way they consume their media. I know I feel differently about how I want to be served as a consumer of films but the old way of there being only one option to me just cannot sustain itself when you consider how many other ways are given to people with regard to music, books and the like.

    I loved WEIRDSVILLE and I plan on watching it again whenever I get a free moment around the house.

    RESERVATION ROAD (2007)

    Director: Terry George
    Cast:
    Joaquin Phoenix, Mark Ruffalo, Jennifer Connelly, Mira Sorvino, Elle Fanning
    Release: October 19th, 2007
    Synopsis:
    Based on the critically acclaimed novel of the same name by John Burnham Schwartz, this is the compelling new dramatic thriller from two-time Academy Award-nominated writer/director Terry George (“Hotel Rwanda”). A tale of anger, revenge, and great courage, the film follows two fathers as their families and lives converge. On a warm September evening, college professor Ethan Learner (two-time Academy Award nominee Joaquin Phoenix), his wife Grace (Academy Award winner Jennifer Connelly), and their daughter Emma (Elle Fanning) are attending a recital. Their 10-year-old son Josh (Sean Curley) is playing cello ““ beautifully, as usual. His younger sister looks up to him, and his parents are proud of their son. On the way home, they all stop at a gas station on Reservation Road. There, in one terrible instant, he is taken from them forever. On a warm September evening, law associate Dwight Arno (Mark Ruffalo) and his 11-year-old son Lucas (Eddie Alderson) are attending a baseball game. Their favorite team, the Red Sox, is playing ““ and, hopefully, heading for the World Series. Dwight cherishes his time spent with Lucas. Driving his son back to his ex-wife, Lucas’ mother Ruth Wheldon (Academy Award winner Mira Sorvino), Dwight heads towards his fateful encounter at Reservation Road. The accident happens so fast that Lucas is all but unaware, while Ethan ““ the only witness ““ is all too aware, as a panicked Dwight speeds away. The police are called, and an investigation begins. Haunted by the tragedy, both fathers react in unexpected ways, as do Grace and Emma. As a reckoning looms, the two fathers are forced to make the hardest choices of their lives.

    View Trailer:
    * Medium (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Positive. It’s a matter of perspective.

    It’s films like this when you can make the distinction between what tent pole pictures are capable of and what good storytelling can do.

    When you launch into a trailer like this, and you’re just ignorant of what you’re about to see, there is the wondering of whether it’ll grab you and whether it will be another in a string of trailers that just come and go out of your mind.

    This one had me thinking about what was happening and how all these parts fit together in a cohesive whole. I damn near lost interest in the beginning when you hear the canned giggles and fake smiles of happy people. Inexorably all these things have a way of turning dark and things do rather quickly.

    After of a day of frivolity you’ve got a father and son doing a little hit-n-run action. Rather than stopping to check what suburban kid they’ve turned into human ground chuck the dad speeds away (We wouldn’t have a movie if he did. We might have a Lifetime made-for-TV-drama but that’s neither here nor there.) and then feels bad about it after he is back in the safe throngs of his home.

    The real drama here starts to pique my interest and I’m trying to peg exactly where I’ve seen other traffic accident movies before but I come up short only to see that the story takes on a sublime quality. There is more to the tale than just the killing of a kid and the father who would stop at nothing (in movie parlance) to bring the killer to justice and I think it’s Ruffalo’s inner guilt that manifests itself that’s the real attraction here; it’s an adage of good writing wherein you try and think about whose perspective could be the one everyone would want to read.

    In this movie, though, there is a real thoughtful thing at play here with the struggle of the man who killed a kid and can’t bring himself to confess and the father who is driven to madness to try and find the man who is so close to him.

    The gun that eventually gets put into the mix of it all is a nice touch, I will say that, but the obligatory gunshot that goes off against a black screen is a little lame if not completely stupid.

    I’m a sucker for films like IN THE BEDROOM and LITTLE CHILDREN and I am hopeful this movie takes a down-to-earth premise and keeps it couched within the boundaries of a real “What If” moment.
    BEE MOVIE (2007)

    Director: Steve Hickner, Simon Smith Cast: (voices) Jerry Seinfeld, Renée Zellweger, Matthew Broderick, John Goodman, Chris Rock, Megan Mullally, Kathy Bates, Alan Arkin, Patrick Warburton
    Release: November 2nd, 2007
    Synopsis: BEE MOVIE is a comedy that will change everything you think you know about bees. Having just graduated from college, a bee by the name of Barry B. Benson (Jerry Seinfeld) finds himself disillusioned with the prospect of having only one career choice ““ honey. As he ventures outside of the hive for the first time, he breaks one of the cardinal rules of the bee world and talks to a human, a New York City florist named Vanessa (Renée Zellweger). He is shocked to discover that the humans have been stealing and eating the bees’ honey for centuries, and ultimately realizes that his true calling in life is to set the world right by suing the human race for stealing their precious honey.

    View Trailer:
    * Large (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Positive. I hope this film serves as a cautionary tale to those people who want to affect the trappings of “indie” but have no desire to actually be indie.

    When you come right out of the chute with Gosling and some random old hag striking up a conversation right outside a church, a church for God’s sake, and she asks the question about whether Ryan has a girlfriend to which he says he doesn’t have one the question right back to him about whether he likes gay love seems a whole lot of out of place to me, to say nothing of its un-funnyness.

    What happens next, we get the quirky mannerisms of someone who seems to fall somewhere between Corky from LIFE GOES ON and Napoleon Dynamite. There’s definitely the feeling that they’re trying too hard, real hard, to make Ryan this caricature of a man who we’re supposed to either sympathize with or feel sorry for. I feel like we’re being sold pretty hard to believe the character.

    The same comment as above applies to the actual introduction to the rubber woman we’re supposed to find outrageously amusing but there isn’t anything, I think, to laugh at here. You’ve got a mildly retarded dude who wants the world to believe this is a real woman. In case you miss the point of the entire movie, here it is again: we’re supposed to believe that this guy believes his love doll has meaning beyond being a sperm receptacle.

    Aaaaaand, to wit, the little “moment” where Emily Mortimer has it out with Gosling about his love doll is complete bullshit beyond any realm of acceptable reality when she says that the entire small town in which they all live (Yeah, I’m sure the townsfolk would be real accommodating for a sex toy being carted into the local Denny’s on Grand Slam Sunday and not hang the poor “˜tard right at the entrance) has been, and I quote “bending over backward” to accommodate his whacked out fetish.

    I’d sooner believe that one day all the clients of Ford Modeling Agency suddenly wake up and have the collective urge to satisfy every young pre-pubescent in America than I do for this contrived tripe.

    Oh, and the love doll clip of her holding a book “reading” to a classroom of kids? Let me go on record as saying that if I ever found out that some sex mannequin was a stand-in for book time I would hang the “˜tard myself with a rope. To make it seem like a funny joke just misses the mark of what a quirky comedy should be.

    Maybe it’s just me but I don’t understand what could possibly be redeeming about this farce of a flick. Gosling, I was with him with HALF NELSON and I was happy to give the man his due in that trailer, but there is absolutely nothing redeeming in this one. Nothing.

    IRON MAN (2008)

    Director: Jon Favreau
    Cast:
    Robert Downey Jr., Terrence Howard, Jeff Bridges, Gwyneth Paltrow Release: May 2nd, 2007
    Synopsis: Based upon Marvel’s iconic Super Hero, IRON MAN tells the story of Tony Stark, a billionaire industrialist and genius inventor who is kidnapped and forced to build a devastating weapon. Instead, using his intelligence and ingenuity, Tony builds a high-tech suit of armor and escapes captivity. Upon his return to America, Tony must come to terms with his past. When he uncovers a nefarious plot with global implications, he dons his powerful armor and vows to protect the world as Iron Man.

    View Trailer:
    * Large (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Positive. This is why Robert Downey Jr. was placed on this earth.

    Too many times you can get caught up in the wrong argument about why something is just going to rock hard or why something looks like it’s going to be the second coming of Christ’s hate against mankind but for the discussion regarding IRON MAN nothing but the raw footage here should be the thrust of any back and forth between fanboys.

    Musical cues aside, and we’ll get into this in a moment, you’ve got something that is radically different than the previews we were given for SPIDER-MAN 3 plus, and more to the point, the same reservations I had regarding the trailers for the web-crawler’s third installment proved the reason why the whole flick just sank under its own weight.

    For starters, and ironically enough, we get “Hell Above Water”, the first musical number that shares the same lineage and pedigree with the trailer for the original SPIDER-MAN, a film that sold a good number of us based on some of the dollars it made during its opening weekend, and just like its web buddy the song helps to push along the narrative. It’s brash, cocky and it seamlessly fits in with Robert’s introduction as the smarmy Tony Stark. I’ve never really read Iron Man with any great frequency but reading what I have and knowing what kind of issues he deals with internally seeing Downey Jr. play with the character without a drip of irony; he’s funny for the simple reason that he’s so shielded from everything external.

    And who can take away from the much quoted moment in the trailer where Downey Jr. talks about war in a manner that would make beatniks blush and pacifists punchy at the idea that fighting is an inevitability so why not be ready? Additionally, it’s the exchange with the grunt in the back of the Hummer that should just ally any concern that Robert might not be the right man for the job; hell, he is the job incarnate. It’s, perhaps, one of the best extended moments we’ve been given this year in a trailer and it exemplifies everything that the character can be if he continues down this path.

    Now, cue Filter’s “Hey Man, Nice Shot.” After the ambush, and I don’t know if I can take the trailer maker to task for this, I am unclear as to what’s happening. You get some dirty freedom fighter, in all his ceremonial terrorist regalia, telling Downey he has 24 hours to help build his missile but I’m confused: how did he get from ambush to glowing implant on his chest to blacksmithing missile parts? This part of the trailer is dramatic, to be sure, but it’s slightly murky with the details.

    Then, if you’re paying attention to the 24-hour time table, he emerges as Series 1 Iron Man? I man it is pretty sweet, fucking awesome, to see the man-robot emerge from the cave and get all practical effect on a bunch of prototypical “bad guys” to the sounds of “Iron Butterfly,” which is a bold choice for those keeping score at home, but it’s incredibly hard to follow.

    He goes from blasting in the desert to coming back and getting all seriously pimp with his cadre of best friends who no doubt are going to be playing parts in this story. What parts to the story are they playing? Again, this is all in the air but you do have to give special attention to Series 2 Iron Man that illuminates its blue hue in the shadows as it looks to get buck wild on some other robo threat.

    The flying sequence at the end? Three words: In-Cred-Ible. If Fareau is to be believed, and he most definitely is, the way they pulled off the extended moment here is seamless. You can be a bitch ass and point out how you can tell it’s fake but it just feels so real in its nuance that when it breaks the sound barrier there is nothing more you can do than be amazed and slack jawed that this could be the newest SPIDER-MAN blockbuster that will deliver what it’s advertising.

  • Trailer Park: What I Did On My Summer Vacation

    By Christopher Stipp

    Archives? Right Here”¦

    Instead of manning-up and actually going the emotionally hard route of being outrightly rejected by publishers, I’m rejecting them first and allowing you to give my entire book a preview, let you read the whole thing or, if you like, download the whole damn thing at no cost. Download and read my first book “Thank You, Goodnight” for FREE.

    What a summer.

    Between not letting the INDIANA JONES story die a quiet death (it was picked up by the New York Post’s infamous Page 6) and busting out two interviews in one week I am damn near done with everything in my written arsenal.

    I think, if you were to have talked to me prior to the Comic-Con, I felt better about this year’s Con than I did in year’s past. One of the reasons why I had a little more confidence wasn’t that I had scored any earth shattering celebrutard, although I was really trying to get Robert Downey Jr. and/or Jon Favreau who both would have been excellent people to get for the 5 or 10 minutes I would’ve been given, but I had enough to get me through the weekend. I had a few things here, a party there, some screenings down the street and a host of other little things that made one big haul. As I put the finishing touches on the video interview last week with Missy Peregrym (I can still do it without even consulting my dictionary) I was struck by the solid response from studios that actually worked with me. It’s been a slow process to actually get to the point that I have now, at the end of every day though I realize what I do here has little with how the earth revolves but that’s another tirade for another day, but it’s been nice progression. Doing this, believe it or not, requires a lot of work from a lot of people but these past weeks of interviews that I’ve been posting have been extremely satisfying from a professional standpoint insofar that I hope at least one of them have been interesting for one of my three fans out there to actually read/watch. The interviews, though, are something people keep asking me to do. People are taking notice and, like Oliver, asking for more. The downside though, as many of you can probably tell, is that they’re incredibly labor intensive. I’ve sought solace in a helper who was eager to do the heavy lifting, and for that I’m grateful, but these things keep coming.

    I’m a trailer park, not some Entertainment Tonight wannabe. That’s why, though, I think keep important people coming back. I’m not interested in what a lot of other frou frou reporters like to talk about and it’s really my eternal quest to be different (Oh, how punk of me to say…) that keeps drawing me back into talking to someone. Again, I hope this is something that works for the lot of you out there and are enjoying both sides of what I’m doing with this space. Since none of you write in to tell me otherwise I’m going to keep doing what I damn well please.

    However, that part is done with for this week and I am on to planning bigger things. This fall will bring you more unique fireside chats from an amalgam of varying personalities. For example, in preparation for 30 DAYS OF NIGHT I have talked with Editor-In-Chief/Poop Shoot slave driver, Chris Ryall, about his work with this summer’s breakout hit, TRANSFORMERS (I loved it) to IFC’s own Henry Rollins as he talks with me 1:1 about what to make of the Republican administration’s stance on homosexuality when you have all these closeted cases of men who prefer the ol’ Hickory Farms Genoa salami than to the cavernous pleasure of the bearded clam to a rather interesting interview with one of the professionals on DANCING WITH THE STARS on why I can’t look away when it’s on.

    There is a lot going on here when I’m not looking at trailers and thank the Lord that these interviews hit in the late summer. We’ve had nothing really of any note come through these parts worth watching but with the hotness that is the IRON MAN trailer (Which I’ll get to later) and the comedic (See example at the bottom of the column) there have been smatterings here and there of greatness. I hope to keep punctuating the weeks of interviews with more trailer goodness but whatever happens know that I am constantly trying to keep your ADD at bay by not doing the same old thing, week after week.

    That all said, I did want to make mention of a DVD that should be on everyone’s Netflix queue or in every hand when you go into a Blockbuster: AWAY FROM HER. Directed and written by Sarah Polley, which was based on a short story by the wickedly sharp Alice Munro, for those who have an appreciation for novels should pick up Munro’s Lives of Girls and Women, the movie is unlike anything you’ve seen this year.

    In a period of time when most movie going experiences allow you to surrender to the technical wizardry of the high-tech and sensory overloading this is movie that forces you to slow down, to listen and to pay attention to how real drama can be presented without it feeling contrived or false. Because the subject matter is so heady, the film deals with one couple’s quiet heartbreak as one of them succumbs to the effects of Alzheimer’s in a wrenchingly tragic way. When you could consider all the ways that this film could go be it saccharine sweet, slightly affective, completely tear jerking or oddly distant, this is one of the most harmonious blends of everything. Where Polley excels in this film isn’t in her presentation of a story that seems so painful and wrenching but it’s her awareness and ability to communicate the story in a way that brings you closer to feeling like you’re listening in to something you shouldn’t.

    Who would have thought that the woman who singlehandedly made a difference in making GO more than it was and DAWN OF THE DEAD wickedly compelling (Try and tell me that her escape from the zombie child and subsequent hoards wasn’t the best way to kick off that flick)? Polley has had one of the more unconventional careers in Hollywood with the way she’s navigated and picked her projects but that’s what makes this movie so great: it’s coming from a place and a woman who immerses herself in everything she does and the material couldn’t be more dense than it already is.

    The film, I promise, will linger on long after you’re done watching it. If you’re attuned to the nuances of how people who are in love deal with one another then I think this story about how one of them slowly has the memory of that love slowly dissolve like a frame of film in front of a projector is just the right thing to get in touch with your inner softie.

    Like I said, this needs to be in your Netflix queue as of yesterday.

    DEDICATION (2007)

    Director: Justin Theroux
    Cast:
    Billy Crudup, Mandy Moore, Tom Wilkinson, Martin Freeman, Dianne Wiestn
    Release: Now out at a penny saver near you.
    Synopsis:
    Henry Roth is messed up. A New York children’s book author who tells kids that Santa doesn’t exist, he hates sleeping with – and next to – anyone, including his girlfriend and must lay on the floor, usually with heavy objects on top of him just to feel safe. His motto is Life is nothing but the occasional burst of laughter rising above the interminable wail of grief. “Dedication,” a modern love story in which a misanthropic, emotionally complex author of a hit children’s book series (Billy Crudup) is forced to team with a beautiful illustrator (Mandy Moore) after his best friend and creative collaborator (Tom Wilkinson) passes away marks the directorial debut of Justin Theroux. As Henry struggles with letting go of the ghosts of love and life, he discovers that sometimes you have to take a gamble at life to find love.

    View Trailer:
    * Medium (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Negative. First of all, lose the porkpie hat and stick your barely conceivable contempt for Intertube users right up your pretentiously laser engraved MacBook Pro’s ass.

    Really, you’re happy to be introducing your bumwad trailer on Apple and you’re so happy that a few monkeys with opposable thumbs can operate a keyboard to behold your cinematic achievement? Wow, bud, you’re big time.

    Of course, Justin may not have wanted to do this. Maybe he was forced to do it by some well-meaning PR flunky but it’s damn gauche and it only serves to rankle me even before seeing the thing.

    That said, though, I am utterly taken by the first few moments of this trailer. As Billy rattles off some of the more bizarre ADD quirks and superstitions he carries in his own head, the sequence edited quite nicely in capturing that herky-jerky style of psychosis that is really indicative of writers in modern film; it’s a hackneyed trope, to be sure, but Billy makes me believe it. And, to boot, one of the more shocking things to ever be hammered out by my fingers, I like Mandy Moore’s blankness.

    The musical score that cues in is reminiscent of ETERNAL SUNSHINE OF THE SPOTLESS MIND but that’s OK. It’s mood lighting on an already nicely prepared moment.

    What’s better, and what can be applauded, is this movie’s marketing campaign that decided to throw a little caution into the face of what a trailer should be. The voiceless moments of Billy wandering around by himself, looking all dejected like every good movie portrayal of a writer should be, reinforces the character. The moment where Billy lets some little girl know that Santa Claus doesn’t exist is a nice cherry on a turd sundae which he is most certainly is. The issue here, then, is how you humanize a turd. Ahh, yes, you enlist Mandy Moore to help.

    Mandy does add a certain kind of beauty to the mix, regardless of how they’re trying to uglify the girl, and as Crudup and her share some time in a diner wherein Moore tries to throttle Billy’s obvious misanthropic (Again, nice move when trying to capture the essence of writers. All writers hate people. Remember that.)

    When Martin Freeman comes into the mix there’s the sense that there could be a triangle worth getting invested in but, really, even as the soothing sounds of the techno track beat on you kind of get the sense that things will work out with everyone finally showing a smile as Billy and Mandy end up together.

    LARS AND THE REAL GIRL (2007)

    Director: Craig Gillespie
    Cast: Ryan Gosling, Emily Mortimer, Paul Schneider, Kelli Garner, Patricia Clarkson Release: October 12th, 2007
    Synopsis: Written by Six Feet Under scribe Nancy Oliver, Lars and the Real Girl is a heartfelt comedy starring Academy-Award nominated Ryan Gosling as Lars Lindstrom a loveable introvert whose emotional baggage has kept him from fully embracing life. After years of what is almost solitude, he invites Bianca, a friend he met on the internet to visit him. He introduces Bianca to his Brother Gus (Paul Schneider) and his wife Karen (Emily Mortimer) and they are stunned. They don’t know what to say to Lars or Bianca – because she is a life-size doll, not a real person and he is treating her as though she is alive. They consult the family doctor Dagmar (Patricia Clarkson) who explains this is a delusion he’s created – for what reason she doesn’t yet know but they should all go along with it. What follows is an emotional journey for Lars and the people around him.

    View Trailer:
    * Large (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Negative. I hope this film serves as a cautionary tale to those people who want to affect the trappings of “indie” but have no desire to actually be indie.

    When you come right out of the chute with Gosling and some random old hag striking up a conversation right outside a church, a church for God’s sake, and she asks the question about whether Ryan has a girlfriend to which he says he doesn’t have one the question right back to him about whether he likes gay love seems a whole lot of out of place to me, to say nothing of its un-funnyness.

    What happens next, we get the quirky mannerisms of someone who seems to fall somewhere between Corky from LIFE GOES ON and Napoleon Dynamite. There’s definitely the feeling that they’re trying too hard, real hard, to make Ryan this caricature of a man who we’re supposed to either sympathize with or feel sorry for. I feel like we’re being sold pretty hard to believe the character.

    The same comment as above applies to the actual introduction to the rubber woman we’re supposed to find outrageously amusing but there isn’t anything, I think, to laugh at here. You’ve got a mildly retarded dude who wants the world to believe this is a real woman. In case you miss the point of the entire movie, here it is again: we’re supposed to believe that this guy believes his love doll has meaning beyond being a sperm receptacle.

    Aaaaaand, to wit, the little “moment” where Emily Mortimer has it out with Gosling about his love doll is complete bullshit beyond any realm of acceptable reality when she says that the entire small town in which they all live (Yeah, I’m sure the townsfolk would be real accommodating for a sex toy being carted into the local Denny’s on Grand Slam Sunday and not hang the poor “˜tard right at the entrance) has been, and I quote “bending over backward” to accommodate his whacked out fetish.

    I’d sooner believe that one day all the clients of Ford Modeling Agency suddenly wake up and have the collective urge to satisfy every young pre-pubescent in America than I do for this contrived tripe.

    Oh, and the love doll clip of her holding a book “reading” to a classroom of kids? Let me go on record as saying that if I ever found out that some sex mannequin was a stand-in for book time I would hang the “˜tard myself with a rope. To make it seem like a funny joke just misses the mark of what a quirky comedy should be.

    Maybe it’s just me but I don’t understand what could possibly be redeeming about this farce of a flick. Gosling, I was with him with HALF NELSON and I was happy to give the man his due in that trailer, but there is absolutely nothing redeeming in this one. Nothing.

    FINISHING THE GAME (2007)
    Director: Justin Lin
    Cast:
    Roger Fan, Sun Kang, Bonnie Hunt, Dustin Nguyen, Mousa Kraish
    Release: October 5th, 2007
    Synopsis: The unexpected death of Bruce Lee, a worldwide phenomenon and established movie star, came at the zenith of his popularity. Having already shot scenes for his upcoming movie GAME OF DEATH, studio heads decided to complete the film by launching a search for his replacement attracting hopefuls from all around the world. FINISHING THE GAME is an uproarious, poignant, unpredictable and action-packed re-imagining of that casting process for Lee’s replacement and examines the leaps and bounds Asians have taken in media representation – or have they?

    View Trailer:
    * Medium (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Positive. Absolutely funny. It’s genuinely a good reason to watch a trailer.

    One of the things about growing up when I did was that when THE CROW came out in 1994 it was damn near my CITIZEN KANE. Although, and obviously, I grew out of that phase of thinking it was better than it really is there was something really intriguing about knowing more about the son of Bruce. The kid’s life and eventual demise on a movie set took on a mythic quality and it was something that eventually led me to discovering ENTER THE DRAGON and then other Asian films that led me to appreciate other movies from around the world. It was a curious thing, though, to watch a biography on Bruce Lee that included moments from a movie that I wish would have been made under Bruce’s watch: GAME OF DEATH.

    Here, then, was a movie that I initially thought was something serious; something that was going to hopefully honor Bruce’s first intention and dismiss the cinematic garbage that was GAME OF DEATH as it eventually was filmed. Lo and behold, though, there was something else afoot.

    This movie has nothing to do with the reality of GAME OF DEATH but that’s quite all right when you see the opening moments of this trailer. It does an excellent job, much better than when a comedy tries too hard to let you know that it’s a comedy with its gimpy goofiness, as it presents itself. You think that you really are watching how some filmmakers wanted to finish GAME OF DEATH but it’s not until after the Sundance mention of its acceptance as an official selection that you realize you’ve been duped. From a room full of Bruce Lee wannabes, one chain smoking as he furiously whips around some nunchucas and as another is taking a pencil and re-creating the android knife trick from ALIENS, to a sleazy producer who says that GAME OF DEATH of Bruce’s GONE WITH THE WIND it starts things on the right foot.

    Fast forward to being introduced to Breeze Loo, a good looking martial artist who has more than enough ego to make this character worth watching simply for the amusement factor, to Cole, another actor who just is simply an ignorant sap who wants in a movie no matter the cost, to Poon, a character actor who doesn’t realize his limitations or stereotype as an Asian in television in the 70’s, you’ve got a mix of interesting people to stick a finger at and have a good laugh mocking.

    As you watch our hopefuls vie for the role of Bruce, their auditions going about as well as anything you see on American Idol in any given season, there is the requisite sense that this isn’t going to go well on purpose. There is the feeling, though, that the filmmakers have captured a certain time period with their production and how everything looks and feels. I’m giving points here for keeping everything, even the music, specific to the moment. It’s immersive.

    I am absolutely going on record, though, as saying that nothing has made me laugh harder than when the Caucasian wild-card who is trying for Bruce’s role (a goof in itself, obviously) gets into it with another hopeful as they spar with one another during training. The punch to the nuts that white boy lands and the relentless twist and grab of his opponent’s man’s sack is excellent. Truly one that elevates any staged nut shot this season.

    And, to expend the joke a little further, the absolutely unnecessarily long web site: http://www.youoffendmeyouoffendmyfamily.com/ is just one more part to this twisted, comedic puzzle. I couldn’t recommend this trailer enough for a good quick laugh.

  • Trailer Park: Missy Peregrym

    By Christopher Stipp

    Archives? Right Here”¦

    Instead of manning-up and actually going the emotionally hard route of being outrightly rejected by publishers, I’m rejecting them first and allowing you to give my entire book a preview, let you read the whole thing or, if you like, download the whole damn thing at no cost. Download and read my first book “Thank You, Goodnight” for FREE.

    Here’s how I can tell that I’m getting to know Missy pretty well: I can so spell her name without having to look it up to see if that’s really how you spell P-e-r-e-g-r-y-m. It’s like the back of my hand at this point.

    One of the reasons, though, that I genuinely looked forward to Comic-Con this year, and how it was honestly one of the most satisfying trips I’ve taken to San Diego, was that Missy is always an entertaining interview; she’s completely honest about what she’s doing, she’s never at a loss to tell it like it is and I can’t help but be amazed by the joie de vivre she possesses.

    Missy has a way of navigating the cutthroat waters of life in Los Angeles by simply shrugging at the absurdity of it all while carving out a resume that is slowly starting to generate more and more opportunities for the actress. From her stint on HEROES to her current run on the CW’s REAPER, and if you haven’t checked out the goodness that is the pilot episode I am sure those of you who are technically inclined can catch that wave somewhere on the Interwebs, Missy brings a freshness to roles that speak to her personality: charming and disarming.

    It’s hard to dismiss the fact that she enjoys what she does and is thankful for what she has but she’s markedly different from any other vapid actress I’ve ever had the misfortune to interview from the standpoint that Missy, at the end of the day, is someone who embodies the axiom of good things happening to good people. With regard to her role as someone who plays opposite of a man who has to keep a day job with the devil Missy can simply do no evil.

    To be sure, when Missy took the stage with her fellow REAPER cohorts at the panel in the biggest hall at the Comic-Con, exuding the same nonchalant attitude that has been present with every interview incarnation we’ve had, I had the feeling that if nothing else in life she can at least be someone who can say that she is who she is and isn’t about to compromise anything to get there. However, she could shill for The Ryde and hook a brother up with one of those cryptic “MMM…Burritos” shirts that she was rocking much to the amusement of this journalist during the interview I’m sure her conscious would turn a blind eye…

    Now, since this is the last installment of my Comic-Con coverage I have to publicly give much love and many thanks to my anonymous and hardest working PR source that keeps allowing me to talk to Missy and others in her employ. You made the expense of getting to San Diego worth every cent I spent and I appreciate it. I still think you need to dress up better if you ever think about taking a photo with me again but I’m sure we can work on that next year.

    line3.gif

    trailerpark2007-09-28.jpg

    Download SDCC Missy Peregrym Interview:

    Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 144.45 MB)
    Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 62.40 MB)

    [display_podcast]

  • Trailer Park: Zachary Levi

    By Christopher Stipp

    Archives? Right Here”¦

    Instead of manning-up and actually going the emotionally hard route of being outrightly rejected by publishers, I’m rejecting them first and allowing you to give my entire book a preview, let you read the whole thing or, if you like, download the whole damn thing at no cost. Download and read my first book “Thank You, Goodnight” for FREE.

    It was an interview like this that reinforced the sense that there is something to learn about the human condition as it pertains to being able to talk to someone whose face was plastered on thousands of hotel keys, billboards and is on television on an hourly basis as his network hangs their dollars making sure everyone gets familiar with a man named Chuck.

    Zachary Levi, as some of you may remember, was interviewed by me years ago when he co-starred alongside Martin Lawrence in BIG MOMMA’S HOUSE 2. The film itself was inconsequential compared to what Zach had to say about his work on the film and how he was going forward with his career.

    Things couldn’t have gone better for the man who was looking to continue his career in front of camera as he landed the title role in one of the biggest fall productions for this year and had the pilot directed by kinetic action director extraordinaire, McG. I wish I could have had the opportunity to talk to Zach during the San Diego Comic-Con this past summer about what, at that point, had been a slowly building monster. Unfortunately, and I realize without the video to prove it I can’t be taken at my word, it was exactly at the Comic-Con when I saw the frenzy that was mounting; Zach, his co-star Joshua Gomez and resident hot blonde of the series, Yvonne Strzechowski, were flanked on all sides by a phalanx of television and press as soon as they entered the press room mere moments before they were slated to appear in another room to promote the show to the public. It was honestly a madhouse of unnatural proportions but all three stars of CHUCK were alive with pleasure as they fielded question after question with bombastic aplomb. It certainly wasn’t the typical pensive, quiet press interaction you saw most of the other productions that were to be had that weekend; there was real excitement and whether you you were there or not there was no denying that Zach seemed pleased to talk about the show.

    Since we spoke a second time he has starred in a couple of lower-budget productions compared to his stint on ABC’s LESS THAN PERFECT and then has exploded in an excellent independent feature, SPIRAL. Zach can now be seen on CHUCK every Monday night, 8/7c on NBC.


    Christopher Stipp: This is Chris.

    ZACHARY LEVI: What’s up, Christopher? Zachery Levi calling.

    CS: It’s about time. I’m telling you I had to wait more times to talk to you since your appearance at the Comic-Con…I saw the show before going there and I honestly really dug it; I think it’s really funny. The thing was I did not expect the kind of fanfare that was there at Comic-Con.

    LEVI: Dude, it was insane.

    CS: Literally, it was just a whirlwind. You came into the press room, you sat for I don’t know how long for your other press stuff and then bam, bam, bam, you were on your way. How was that? You and Josh just seemed to be in a blizzard ““ a flury.

    LEVI: I know. It was so crazy. I almost cried, man.

    First, we got there and I’m looking at rebel troops, like crossing the crosswalk and it was obvious we were certainly in the right place and then we go in and do a little press stuff and I saw you and then it was “We gotta go, We gotta go…”

    In the screening room ““ I had no idea how many were going to be there – I’m sitting in the back for the last 15 minutes of the screening and the audience had been enjoying it throughout the whole thing. So we just get the last 15 minutes of them just cheering, applauding, laughing. And I was like…I just can’t believe it.

    It took a month to shoot the pilot and this was the first time it was being shown and it was not just a general audience…it was to our core audience ““ the comic book video game generation. People like me, really. Then the show comes to an end and they announce that we were going to take the stage and we get this standing ovation, 2,000 people give a standing ovation. I just couldn’t believe it. It just goes down in your own personal record book as being one of coolest things you’ve ever experienced. I hope the show lasts and that we keep providing the level of entertainment and that at next year’s Comic Con we can fill the big hall and just keep pumping out the stuff that they want to watch and that we want to watch and hopefully that you want to watch. It was just crazy, man.

    CS: I saw people wearing those CHUCK shirts all weekend after that. I was flying home to Phoenix and I saw a couple people walking around, and I don’t know what the shirt said exactly…

    LEVI: Oh, ChucksSecret.com or something like that?

    CS: Yes, those were the ones. Then your face was on a bunch of hotel keys…

    LEVI: Dude, how insane was that??? I had friends texting me “Holy shit!!!!! Your face is on my room key to my hotel room!”

    CS: I have to know. What kind of Fourth Wall did that break for you, if at all? I would imagine, with all the things that had your face on it…it had to feel slightly Bizarro World at that moment.

    LEVI: Oh that”¦straight up crazy Bizarro World. Another buddy of mine, an actor buddy who’s on Reno 911, I get a text from him. He took a picture with his phone and sends it to me…What am I doing on this thing, he says. And then, talk about the perfect ice breaker, all the parties going on.

    If I could only just stayed in San Diego. We had to go to Comic-Con and then come home and go work. We couldn’t even stay that night. We had to shoot that night. If I could have stayed in San Diego all I had to do was just walk up to people and say “Hey, yeah, it’s me, the card key, it’s me”¦” it was ridiculous.

    CS: Obviously the promotions on NBC have been just as crazy.

    LEVI: The promotions have been so incredible and I am so grateful for them. Because I know what it’s like not to have any promotion. Working on a show that’s just thrown in there and I know the networks and studios have just so much money that they can spend on promotions for their entire season and I feel very fortunate and very blessed to be on the receiving end of all of that. They are pumping us like crazy.

    I just saw a cardboard standee that’s going in all the AMC theaters and it’s going to be Chuck on popcorn bags. Dude, it’s ridiculous. I don’t know what to say. I don’t know what it going to be like to go in to an AMC theater and see my face on a popcorn bag.

    CS: You’ve got to be honest with me ““ are you bringing that stuff home…possibly putting it up in the bedroom…telling the ladies, “Oh that? Yeah, that’s me.”

    LEVI: Yeah, right!

    You know what’s funny? I always, in the back of my mind, said maybe I should hold on to one of these things for posterity but I never ended up doing it. Family and friends always want one but I just kind of feel like, I don’t know, it would just get lost somewhere. What’s the point? Life is too short. I remember. I remember I was a cardboard standee. If somebody else wants to collect it”¦.rock and roll, go for it but I don’t know.

    CS: How’s the production going?

    LEVI: The production has been great. I mean you know they are long, long days. It a really ambitious show. What we accomplished in a month, we are trying to accomplish in 8 days

    CS: Really…

    LEVI: Really tough. Really tough. But I think it’s doable but it’s just a matter of everybody following the rhythm. We have new people on the crew and now we got writers that are trying to write episodes that we can shoot that day. We started back with the first episodes that had 80 scenes ““ that’s a lot of set ups and then they started to trend down and made it about 50-60. We’re trying to get it to a place where we can do it in 8 days. But what we’re hoping is that we don’t have to trim it down too much and that we can, show Warner Bros. and NBC when we start airing that we are a contender and then hopefully they’ll have more faith and put more money in the production side of it and give us a full functioning second unit because that’s what we really need.

    It’s not a matter of more days on the first unit schedule and it’s not a matter of making it smaller in scope because if you do that you are not giving the show justice that should be done. The show is an action comedy ““ you need to have the action. You need to have the car explosions and the gun fights and the cool stunts and that stuff and you need to have the time with the characters to have the relationships and the comedy becomes the spy stuff as well and it’s an ambitious show. HEROES is an ambitious show as well and they have a fully functioning second unit that is shooting the whole time the first unit is shooting. So they are able to pull it off. That’s they way it should be.

    CS: Right. As the show is progressing, like you said, a month’s shoot for this one show ““ great premise great beginning, middle and end, now you have your second episode and you physically could not top it but what do you think in the back of your head that in the writer’s room that you hope keeps going as the episodes progress? Is there anything that you say that this is an aspect of the character that you want to retain and not put off to the side because there is only so much that can fit in there?

    LEVI: No, no, like week after week I was just looking at the pilot and seeing what McG did and it was just, the effects, everything, like you said it took a month to do but you can’t do that in 8 days, so what’s the one core thing that the writers and obviously the directors as they move along that they want to retain that’s not lost in any of that?

    Well, I think in a perfect world, you want to retain it all.

    I think television is coming into a place where people are expecting more but studios are still expecting it to be shot in an 8 day typical hour long fashion, and it’s not…It’s not realistic.

    To me it’s not and I understand that studios need to be frugal. They have a lot of shows and they don’t know what’s going to pop and what’s going to not and I also feel good about that they will allocate funds appropriately. Like, last year NBC had STUDIO 60 and HEROES and they put most of their money in STUDIO 60 and mid-way through the season they said STUDIO 60 is not performing and HEROES is so let’s invert these scales if you will. So what I’m hoping is that we start airing some episodes, they’ll see the promise in our show, and will want to give us more to stay on track with the initial vision of the show. In the meantime, sacrifice as little as possible. And by little I mean by still keeping some great stunts in every episode, great relationships, great methodology and maybe we are losing a few setups, maybe more of a technical thing than anything and this stuff of “fake it til you make it” kind of thing until you air it.

    Because right now we are on episode three but we are still missing shots from episode one. So in order to get it done the way we want to get it done and get everything done that we want to get done, we just kind of put off scenes until later. We just finished episode one and we still need a couple scenes from episode two and started episode four today and we saw episode three but I’m fine”¦I’m fine going back”¦and as long as we can keep the integrity and vision of the show we started out to make and not be watered down lower budget, less time version of that. I’d rather work longer hours and make a great show than work less hours and produce a show that’s like it’s another television show. You know?

    CS: How are you handling the new hours?

    LEVI: Oh man. Well, I’ll tell you this: everyone is working 12 hour days. To give you an idea”¦.like last Friday we were shooting night exteriors and finished shooting at 6:00 in the morning ““ we’re working over schedules, working the night shift. And then last night we’re out there at 6 in the morning and call time today is 6 pm and so we’ll probably wrap again around 6 in the morning. It’s a far cry where you might work 30 hours in a week and all of that was real hard work…(Laughs) You just got to show up and hang out and have fun all day long and make jokes with your friends and have custom omelets made and a live audience. It was so cush.

    But it’s much more fulfilling to be in a drama, especially on the lead. I get to run around with guns. I don’t get to shoot the guns which I am a little bitter about but we can get to that later”¦. But there’s gun fights, and car chases and helicopters. It’s just everything I ever dreamed about when I was a kid. Just playing around and playing war and throwing dirt wads at your buddies like they are hand grenades. That just what you hope you get to do. And now I get to live that dream and the show gets to be funny. I’m young, I’m single, I don’t have any pets. This is the time to be doing it.

    CS: Absolutely. I know the answer will be “Great!” but, really, talk to me about how you and Joshua Gomez have come together and made the chemistry work between the two of you because I will honestly say, and I wouldn’t b.s. you if I didn’t believe it, that these two guys have a good relationship with one another; best friends, in a way. You believe it”¦.you know?

    LEVI: Thank you. It’s really a big blessing. I mean Josh is so incredible because I feel I’ve known the guy forever.

    We sat down and for all those times that my mom or anyone told me do not play video games, guess the work paid off. Because Josh and I get to play gamers on the show and we are both huge gamers in real life so immediately we have this kind of jumping off point. We just clicked immediately. Talking about all our favorite games from like Atari all the way to the present”¦.which one Super Mario Brothers franchise was superior and why weren’t they OK. My favorite first person shooters games. Neither one of us is into sports games all that much. We like shoot “˜em ups and stuff like that. We just got BioShock and Josh just did some voice work on that, he’s done a lot of voice work on games. I got my Xbox in my dressing room ““ he’s got his Xbox in his dressing room. We just don’t have a lot of time to play anymore because we’re working so much but we’re still gamers to the core and the first day we pretty much sat down and we knew that we had good acting chemistry. I got cast and they had me come in and read with the guys auditioning for his role and he was just ““ all the guys were great ““ but he was just the funniest and we definitely had the best rapport. And then they had us sit down and have lunch one day just to try and get to know one another and I think he turned to me at one point and said, “So are you a gamer?” Because we played them in the show and I turned on him so quick, like “Am I a gamer? Yes, I am, thank you.” And he just said “So am I” and we just talked about our favorite video games.

    And he is, honestly, just one of the sweetest, funniest, nicest guys you will ever meet in your life. He is the salt of the earth and we just have fun everyday. Everyday we get to work with each other we just have fun. It can be complete utter nonsense. Like little inside jokes with friends you’ve know for 10 years, we’ve known each other for 10 weeks. Which is good. And we both see what a huge blessing that this is. We just get to play video games for a living in our characters and get wrapped up in espionage ““ it’s just so much fun. And, so thank you. I’m glad that it works on the screen and I thank God that he was able to bring Josh and I together because I felt it in my personal life and went right to screen. It’s just good to know.

    CS: Absolutely. What the two of you have together is obviously the comedy, is it different now ““ there is no audience, there is no closed set, you guys are free wheeling in front of the camera having to be funny, is there retake, are you used to doing it again and again making it just as funny on the 1st take the 2nd take the 3rd take?

    LEVI: You know what’s interesting is it’s tougher to gauge what’s funny.

    Laughter is a good gauge to tell if a joke landed or not and everyone has to be quiet in front of the monitors and cameras and what not, but I think Josh and I have a pretty good idea of what’s funny. We talk to one another and say, that was really funny or whatever. There’s a little more leniency and they definitely support us in our adlibbing and our characters probably get to do the most together so we’ll constantly change it up. We, of course, get what’s scripted but after that we just have a field day and we’ll throw something in there and say, “Have you tried this or that?”

    I try to not tell them, I just like to surprise everybody by the monitors. I’d rather not tell them I’m going to do this. I’d rather say “Hey Josh, let’s do this” and of course after the take and you hear people laughing then you know you did something good.

    CS: Then, I’ve got to know ““ the Vicki Vale BATMAN reference ““ it makes me laugh every time I see that part, was that scripted?

    LEVI: Well, the actual Vicki Vale song part?

    CS: Right.

    LEVI: Well, that part was scripted but the phone drop was not.

    The way it was scripted was that – stop the presses was that the Vicki Vale thing and I look up and I see her and I quickly put the phone down but I thought, I don’t know, I love physical comedy and I love slapstick not too slapsticky but some jokes and some physicality.

    So the first take, I just thought, “Well, I’ll just let the phone drop and then play it off.” She liked it but then we went back and forth ““ should we put it in and we go back to the take where I didn’t drop it and back and forth and then they decided to put it in and now they used it in the Fall trailers. It was a fun moment.

    There’s a lot of stuff in the pilot that we made up ““ that was not originally in it. When Yvonne says “You geeks are good” that was supposed to end of that scene but then I was like, “Josh, let’s do this thing where we both look at each other.”

    You know we’re both nerds playing like we are not the Geek Squad but we’re trying to be but Best Buy wouldn’t do it ““ we tried to get that cleared but Best Buy wouldn’t do it which I find kind of ridiculous because it’s such a great show…but at the end of the day we had to create our own world and we don’t have some corporate guys breathing down our necks making sure we’re not doing anything outside of what they want. So it’s just little moments thoughout making it, layering it and making it more of our own. I’m free to discover my character and play and make those moments and I’m glad they end up working.

    So in answer to your question, Vicki Vale was partly scripted and part improv. One of my favorite moments as well.

    CS: And you are also now with Adam Baldwin who some would say he peaked with SERENITY but I would say MY BODYGUARD.

    LEVI: It’s funny, it’s kind of a generational thing ““ I’ve never seen My Body Guard.

    CS: Are you serious?

    LEVI: I’m 26.

    CS: That’d be about right.

    LEVI: When did it come out?

    CS: Let’s see, I’m 32 and I barely remember seeing it on HBO.

    LEVI: I saw a lot of movies when I was a little tiny kid. My parents had HBO but for some reason I never saw MY BODYGUARD and I’ve been meaning to rent it since working with Adam but I haven’t yet. Adam Baldwin is one of the greatest guys I’ve ever worked with, he is so talented. He’s had one of those careers you can only hope for as an actor. He’s never gotten to the A list, break out huge, but he’s worked a lot. Been able to support his wife and three kids. His daughter is going off to college. It’s crazy. He’s 35″¦.40 whatever. He is the most solid dude in the world. Papa Bear. Because every one else in the show is generation X, or whatever. And Baldwin, he’s the rock. He’s they guy who’s been around the block a couple of times and he’s so grounded, he’s even tempered, he loves being at work. All the things you look for in a co-worker. And he’s really supportive.

    He’s been working before I was born and he supports me. He is constantly with you, using words like you’re the leader, lets do this action and it means so much to me. Adam Baldwin deferring to me that way, it is so akward. This guy has been working so long. I’ve been working a little bit but not nearly as long as him. But it means a lot. It really inspires a lot of confidence in me and I just hope I can get to work everyday and really appreciate it. This crew works so hard and long hours and into the night. I just hope they all know that it’s all for the best. I really believe that if we continue to work hard and continue to put these hard hours in now that once this show airs and we can find our audience and it will all be worth it. And we’ll get the extra money for the stuff that we need in the budget whether it be extra days, second unit, better equipment and we can give pay raises for the second season, third season, what have you. But I look at the show as a big family because I spend more time with them than with my friends and I want people to feel taken care of and when you put in hard work you should be taken care of.

    CS: Well I don’t want to take up any more of your time…I know you have to run but I have just one last question to ask ““ do you feel there is weight on your shoulders? Obviously, all the promos have been about you, all the things have been just about you, you, you. Do you feel any of that pressure that you are the center of attention?

    LEVI: I never once felt like it was a weight or a burden. I always felt like what an amazing opportunity. What a great gift. I’ve been around people that have that opportunity and squander it. You know, people that treat crew badly or less than what they deserve and I feel like when you are given that place you are given this great gift to be able to really just love and appreciate and support your cast and your crew and it’s incredible how far it goes when your crew and your cast feels like you the lead or the star or whatever that you care about them or that you take the time to just say “Good Morning” even, it’s sad how many people don’t do that and how detrimental it is to a show and
    I have been able to kind of check that out from the sidelines and see how people have done well with it or not done well with it but always look forward to the opportunity to be given the opportunity to do well with it because I see the beauty and the benefit of it.

    And the promos and stuff, to be able to go and tell how much I love my cast and crew, I look at that as such a great opportunity and I don’t know”¦with all the talk shows and stuff starts happening I guess that can get a little hairy at times”¦they are always looking for funny antidotes. I don’t think of myself as an antidotal type person. I have this really weird habit of forgetting all the funny stores that happened in my life. So I don’t know how that will all turn out”¦I hope well.

    But I don’t look at it like a weight or a burden. I look at it as the greatest gift I’ve ever been given in this business. I will always appreciate it. Even if I’m having a bad day. Put it in perspective. I mean, I’m I get to be CHUCK in a show called CHUCK and shoot at Warner Bros. ““ historic Warner Bros. And our sound stage ““ a CASABLANCA stage. I’m saying that Humprey “F’ing” Bogart walked around on this stage…To be able to work with such incredible actors and an incredible cast, writers, and directors…You dream of being the title character, you dream to be in a show where you get to be funny and action and drama and romance. So being a weight, no. Do I certainly put it in perspective and see the possibility and great responsibility that is? Absolutely.

  • 1 Quick Question: The *Disappearing* INDIANA JONES AICN Story

    10quickquestions.jpg

    indyteaser.jpgBy Christopher Stipp

    Archives? Right Here”¦

    Hey everyone.

    A) Go enjoy the Oded Fehr piece that’s gone live. Oded was just an eloquent actor who knows how to play his roles with equal parts seriousness and bombast. Check out RESIDENT EVIL: EXTINCTION if zombies are your thing.

    B) I hate when things disappear; makes you wonder what happened and it makes me want to get to the bottom of things real quick like a crazed weasel on crystal.

    The thing that bugs me most about this situation is that AICN is usually pro-rumor and pro-high-level secret outing and usually doesn’t give a fuck unless they’re served legal papers dictating otherwise. I know that’s an oversimplification of their rumor m.o. but what triggered this note that you’re reading is that the story they published on Tuesday, September the 18th of this week was utterly fascinating just due to the sheer unbelievability of the source. (Praise the Lord of Google cache) It wasn’t some agent, it wasn’t some suit looking to piss off those involved in the production and it really wasn’t someone with a grudge: It was a leak supplied by a very happy, very joyous actor who made it big, relatively speaking, and wanted to share with his hometown newspaper. The author of the story is a journalist by the name of James Coburn who writes for the Edmond Sun.

    This was a story in the newspaper. (Praise the Lord two times for Google cache)

    Now, for those keeping score and want to add things up the Internets maths go like this: AICN posts link and story to Edmond Sun, AICN allows people to comment about the story, comments last from 4:42 am on the 18th until about 5:24 am when the last post is allowed to go up and, like a burning mist, it all goes away. Away from the front page, away from their archives and it goes away without so much of one of those “UPDATE” notices about what some lawyer has told them about the validity or legality of their information.

    I’d usually let things lie about here. I could almost not care what some low-level actor had to say (although, as you will see below) but what made me REALLY curious was that that the Edmond Sun no longer has an existence of the story on their site; oddly, they have some User Name and Password feature that’s essentially blocking all access to the page. But, like I said above, thanks be to God for a cache screen shot. Regardless, here’s the article in question so *SPOILER ALERT* for those who tread into sticky territory and here’s to me for wondering what happened. I’m waiting to hear from the journalist in question as to why the story has evaporated from their site.

    Oddly, or more curiously, the INDIANA JONES story is the number two search result when you type in EDMOND SUN into Google. Stay tuned for more information. And for those who want to start talking Non-Disclosure Agreements, I’d like to introduce you to the 1st Amendment; it’s the spillee – not the reporter – who’s up to their neck in trouble.

    Enjoy!

    New Indiana Jones film has Edmond actor

    James Coburn
    The Edmond Sun
    EDMOND – Tyler Nelson’s dancing talent has landed him a part in “Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull.”

    The fourth film in the Indiana Jones saga will once again star Harrison Ford and is produced and directed by Steven Spielberg and George Lucas. Release of the film is expected during the week of Memorial Day, according to Lucasfilm.

    The 23-year-old actor and dancer is the son of Theresa and Dr. David Nelson of Edmond. He now lives in Los Angeles and also appears in an upcoming movie with Brad Pitt.

    “He has demonstrated that he is tenacious once setting a goal. He loves the process of mastering a new talent,” Theresa Nelson said.

    What Tyler understands about the Indiana Jones movie is based on his own scenes that were filmed during the first week of September. Tyler plays a Russian soldier. Only the lead actors were ever given scripts, so Tyler still doesn’t know the entire plot.

    “Apparently, the Soviet Army was searching for a crucifix skull in the jungles of South America and Indiana Jones was searching, as well,” Tyler said.

    The Russian Army tries blackmailing Indiana Jones to help them find the crystal skull by “threatening to kill Karen, his old flame from the Lost Ark.”

    Actress Karen Allen of “Raiders of the Lost Ark” fame returns to play Jones’ love interest Marion Ravenwood. Cate Blanchett was cast as the Russian interrogator.

    “We took Indiana Jones hostage and managed to find the skull,” Tyler said.

    Afterward, Tyler and the other Russian soldiers rejoice in the jungle by wildly dancing and singing to Russian balalaika folk music beside a roaring campfire.

    His ability to perform classical Russian dances landed him in the movie. Professional opportunities opened for Nelson after graduating from Russia’s Kirov Academy and studying with the Bolshoi Ballet in Moscow a few years ago.

    “They were filming us outside of a tent dancing and then turned the camera inside the tent,” Tyler explained his scene. “I saw Harrison Ford strapped in a chair being interrogated. I started to gather they were holding this big crystal-looking thing in the tent and heard someone mention a crucifix skull.”

    In the movie, Indiana actor Shia LaBeouf plays Indiana Jones‘ son. Jones learns of this and falls in love with Ravenwood again, Tyler said.

    “After we did the first take, Steven Spielberg came up to us and shook our hands and said that we were great,” Tyler said.

    Spielberg’s smile and easygoing personality puts actors at ease.

    “He’s subtly suggesting things so actors can do it on their own and not just follow blindly,” Tyler said.

    Spielberg’s direction style is in contrast to the more aggressive director, David Fincher, with whom Tyler worked with on the production set of “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button.”

    The movie starring Brad Pitt and Cate Blanchett is set to be released next spring or summer. Pitt’s character ages backward in the film.

    Tyler shares a small scene with Pitt in the film by playing a theater usher.

    “If I was rushing, he would hold me back,” Nelson said. “I waited for signals from him.”

    Blanchett was a perfectionist while Pitt spent his time reading between filming, Tyler said. A skilled film actor, Pitt is keenly aware of camera lighting and timing.

    “I learned a lot being next to him and seeing how observant he was about his movements,” Tyler said.

    Theresa said she’s confident her son will accomplish whatever goal he sets for himself.

    “Tyler is living his dream, enjoying every day what comes his way because of his planned and well-executed preparation,” she said.

    TO LEARN MORE about Edmond’s Tyler Nelson, go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyler_Nelson.

  • Trailer Park: Oded Fehr

    By Christopher Stipp

    Archives? Right Here”¦

    Instead of manning-up and actually going the emotionally hard route of being outrightly rejected by publishers, I’m rejecting them first and allowing you to give my entire book a preview, let you read the whole thing or, if you like, download the whole damn thing at no cost. Download and read my first book “Thank You, Goodnight” for FREE.

    You can’t help but see it as a duality.

    With Oded Fehr’s career in Hollywood working out in the exact opposite direction that most other actors build their resumes, his stints in THE MUMMY pictures thrusted him to the front of the line of big budget productions, Oded found himself being quickly established within the acting community. He took his notoriety and actually channeled it into smaller roles on television. This part is important to understand because from Presidio Med, Charmed and even UC: Undercover Oded two-stepped back into the thunderous actioneer, RESIDENT EVIL: APOCALYPSE without so much as missing a beat.

    Too many times in this business you talk to people who are vocal about being film actors and nothing but or television actors that only sees television as a way into film. Oded, I think, doesn’t see things that way. As evidenced by his turn in Sleeper Cell on Showtime you can see Oded deliver a tightly packed performance that is definitely an argument as to why film actors need to rethink their stance on the issue.

    I believe the other part of this duality about Oded, and this could be pure speculation, is when he’s going to break from playing characters with obviously “international” names like Prince Sadir, Kazim, Amahl Ali Akbar, Zankou, et al. Hopefully you can see where this is leading when you understand that, as Carlos Olivera in the newest RESIDENT EVIL installment, his newest role is yet another step forward for the actor who is constantly looking for roles that will allow him to be seen as an actor who can play roles of varying type.

    I talked with Oded regarding the choices he makes with regard to work, whether he’s had it up to here with productions set in the sand and what it’s like to be a working actor with small children.

    RESIDENT EVIL: EXTINCTION opens Friday.

    ODED FEHR: Hi…is this Christopher Stipp? This is Oded Fehr.

    CHRISTOPHER STIPP: How are you doing?

    FEHR: I’m very good, how are you?

    CS: I’m doing fine. I couldn’t wait to talk to you.

    FEHR: I appreciate that.

    CS: I know you’ve already been through rounds and rounds and rounds of press and all that…

    FEHR: Yeah, but it’s not so bad.

    CS: No?

    FEHR: I like to talking about movies and the work.

    CS: The only reason I bring that up is because I recently saw an interview with Kevin Bacon talking about doing press and junkets and what he thought of junkets. Being on the other side I’ve got to think that answering the same questions again and again and again”¦

    FEHR: The junket days are definitely hard. They are a little bit mind numbing because you literally do answer the same questions over and over and I think it gets to the point where the day you can sum up all the answers right off the bat from the first one.

    CS: I am absolutely fascinated by that only from your point of view. Obviously in the back of your head you want a memorable, a nice conversation”¦is there things you look for – hope that somebody brings up instead of the “What was it like to work with” kind of questions?

    FEHR: No, I was thinking about it myself; what would be the questions that would be most interesting? It’s one of those things that when you are on your side, you know your work really well and sometimes you are surprised by questions some people ask you as far as your work because it’s not the first thing you think of. It is the same with me. I don’t necessarily ““ I’m surprised by the questions or I’m not surprised by the questions. As far as I’m concerned I always afraid I’m boring people. Because I’m not really ““ I live a very simple life. I’m a father first, husband and so on so I’m not nearly as interesting as others might be.

    CS: Well, you are to me because I have two girls at home, one’s four and one’s one so when I saw that you had two children of your own.

    FEHR: Exactly the same ages.

    CS: I was utterly fascinated from the point of view that your world must have changed dramatically. You have a preconceived notion of what life will be like when you say “I am going to be a father and having to balance”…Obviously, at the end of the day, acting is work.

    FEHR: It is very much that. The thing about me I think is I was always very ready to have children and looked forward to having children and a family. My wife and I got married and really found a wonderful life with each other and we added it on with children and it never”¦.you know how people always warn you everything will be so different. Everything is upside down, life is completely different and shocking but for it me it always felt as though it was very much a natural progression of things. I love it. It’s the first and foremost most important thing in my life.

    And acting is definitely a job. It’s the most wonderful job. I’m the luckiest person on earth to have such a great job and to be able to sustain our life with it”¦ It’s definitely a job. It’s one of those things”¦no body can touch me. If somebody doesn’t want me for a certain role or if somebody doesn’t like the work I do it doesn’t really affect me as far as who I am ““ it just affects me as I just had a bad day at work. Do you know what I mean?

    CS: Absolutely. I looked at the shoot you did for the latest RESIDENT EVIL. I thought it said something about 55 days or something to that affect. Almost two months. Does that come into the picture now? All these years now of not having children and now you do”¦or is it “This is what I have to do to be a working father”?

    FEHR: You know what? The thing about RESIDENT EVIL was that it was a wonderful shoot for me because we shot most of it in Mexicali which is four hours away. It all definitely, definitely comes into play with my family and I like to bring my family with me whenever I can. I just shot a movie up in Vancouver and spent three and a half weeks away from the family which is extremely difficult but then they came up for the final two weeks. I always have them come join me whenever possible. But, as far as RESIDENT EVIL was concerned, it was great, I used to drive home. Any time I would have at least 24 hours, I would drive home four hours just to see them and drive four hours back. But it was totally worth it. My daughter was only a month and a half old. We went through quite a lot to have her in the sense that my wife was on bed rest for a few months and actually hospitalized for seven weeks. It was really hard.

    CS: Oh my…

    FEHR: But we have a beautiful baby girl. It was totally worth it. It was great. I had a wonderful time in all aspects of RESIDENT EVIL: EXTINCTION.

    CS: One of the first really big questions I have is after looking at the stuff you’ve done for the MUMMY and now RESIDENT EVIL”¦the kinds of shoots that they were, I’m just curious – are you just sick of filming in the sand?

    (Laughs)

    FEHR: Ha ha, no. I do love it. I’m naturally drawn more to heat than cold. I have a much better time being in 125 degrees than being in zero degrees. I really enjoy it. Personally I think it just looks so fantastic. It looks amazing, that kind of natural beauty you get with dunes, the rolling sand hills, it just the earth colors is extremely beautiful. Very sexy, very adventure like. I think Milla looks better than she ever looked in anything I’ve seen her in. It’s just very exciting and a lot more adventure like.

    CS: Right, in fact you are leading right into the second thing I was going to bring up. You mentioned the word adventure-like and these movies just lend themselves to feeling sort of epic and I’m just curious from your side of things if there were things you have to do as an actor sort of embody that largess, that bombast of an adventure movie that you need to do. This is not a tiny role. You really have to play it up as it is.

    FEHR: Yeah, I mean you try to do everything you can as far as building up the emotional depth of the character in these kinds of movies is not nearly as much work as you would do in a show like Sleeper Cell or Hamlet. But this movie is a lot more passion driven. I certainly spent three months or so working out, trying to build up more, trying to look like someone who is a hired killer, a fighter kind of thing, you know, soldier for hire. Definitely attempted at the same time to loose a lot of fat. Get that lean look ““ lean and hungry look of someone who is living in a post-apocalyptic world. You try to do a lot more physical stuff in these kinds of movies.

    CS: Does anything surprise you anymore as to what these writers are coming up with as far as premises for these movies? Does anything go “Oh God…” You say the words post-apocalyptic, a lot of snobs, for lack of a better word would turn up their nose”¦

    FEHR: I can’t see anybody turning up their nose or doing any of that with this kind of movie anyway in the sense that this is very much a genre of movie that snobs I don’t think would even look at. It’s the third installment in a genre of a move that was created from a video game and, truthfully, I think it was very well done.

    The only other ones that might come close even though I think this is more truthful to the game is Laura Croft. And the thing about this one I believe is that the script is better than the last two, definitely the location, the details. I other two were great it’s just a nice progression, a nice build up from one movie to the next and I definitely think this is the best of all three. It has a lot more of that adventure feel just because of where it’s shot and all the other characters that have been added to it. It has a MAD MAX kind of feel in the sense of what’s left of the world. I think it’s one of those things that’s in all our minds. Are we going to bring this world to an end one day and only a few of us will survive.

    CS: When you were reading the script for the third one ““ and I’m really curious to know – that when you are reading a script, even before one frame is shot, was it detailed enough that you could actually see how these individual parts evolve or have evolved since the last film or is there a lot of imagination you have to posses to try and envision if the movie is going to be schlocky?

    FEHR: I think one of the hardest things for any actor, actually, not in my case with this one, if an actor is reading a script and is going to read for a certain part ““ your interpretation of what it is and the director’s interpretation could be two totally different things. That being said, reading this one after shooting the second one and seeing the first one you kind of have an idea of what it is that we’re talking about. And it was very clear in the script the vision, the totally different style from the last ones in the sense of the location, where it’s taking place and what the world looks like now. The fact is that the movie happens mostly in daytime, outdoors. The other movies were very much in the dark and felt very closed. So all of that is very different. It read much bigger obviously, bigger sceneries, bigger everything.

    You can tell but you never have that 100% vision of the director. You don’t know where he’s going to take it or how he’s going to take it to shoot certain things. Even when you are shooting it you can’t 100% tell what it’s going to look like. You can see with your own eyes and every once in a while you look in a monitor but you still have no idea what it will look like after somebody adds the special effects to it. That’s where it takes me a few times to watch the movie and actually enjoy the story line because what I do the first few times is just go, “Oh my gosh, that is what it looks like, or wow they did that, the girls look fantastic, oh they added””¦..And that’s how you watch the whole thing and you go through it and what your remember is so different.

    CS: It’s funny you bring that up. Some people don’t like to ““ it’s an odd thing ““ I encounter some people like to watch what they do, some people say I’ve filmed it and move on and feel very uncomfortable looking at it. But it doesn’t seem like you have a problem with that.

    FEHR: I don’t particularly enjoy watching myself. It’s probably the same feeling you must have when you leave a message on your phone. You hear your voice and say oh my gosh, do I really sound like that? 10 times worse.

    CS: But you’re a nice looking guy, aesthetically speaking…

    FEHR: You’re part of a project ““ and I’m interested in directing one day and I am fascinated by seeing how the complete picture comes together.

    CS: Funny you bring that up that you wanted to direct. You mentioned that the MUMMY mostly made your career what it is but most people work in the opposite direction with actors eventually leading to the big time, big budget role. But right out the gate you’ve done the big budget movie. What have you done to try and get the kind of roles like Sleeper Cell to demonstrate your range and that you are not just a big action go-to guy?

    FEHR: I wish I could tell you that it’s as easy as oh this is what I want to do and this is what I’m going to do. It never is. The business has become very difficult out there. It’s much harder to get work. You can tell. Huge stars are doing TV shows and you never expect them doing. A very small percentage of actors are in a position that they can shoot exactly what they want to do and even they don’t get the opportunity unless they develop it themselves. So I can’t say that I just chose what I want. On the other hand, I do say no a lot. If there is something that I like, something that I read that I enjoy, for me, 99% of the time it’s the script. If it is something I enjoy – no matter what genre it is in. I’m happy to do it. I do try to do as many different things as I possibly can. DEUCE BIGALOW is a comedy and I’d love to do more comedy and always keep my eye out for a nice comedy to be a part of. Many times I’ll do tiny roles like in DREMER for the opportunity to work with people like Kurt Russell and Kris Kristofferson. So you just try to not do actual crap. (Laughs) But sometimes you just can’t help it for whatever reason. Most of the time you try to do things you enjoy reading.

    CS: I’d like to ask you ““ when I was going through your resume a lot of the roles that you played with the exception of the work you did with UC Undercover, your characters names have a very international, ethnic sort of ring to it, is there any sort of frustration on your part, maybe there wasn’t or isn’t…

    FEHR: There was a little bit in the beginning, obviously. The MUMMY was a wonderful thing on one hand ““ a double edge sword because it was difficult for anyone to see beyond the long hair, the beard, and the Arab accent. But that being said not being in the TV world there is no ““ I just did a pilot for Fox last season which I play a doctor…

    Truthfully, it’s one of those things, you have to, whenever you sell anything whether it’s a product or you as an actor you really have to stand with your feet on the ground and be aware of what it is the people perceive your product is to be. And if your biggest advertisement shows the product as an Arab character it’s going to be hard for anyone to see you as anything else. You have to think of yourself ““ when you see an actor do something that you really enjoy you immediately think of him doing another 15 roles which are exactly the same. Your natural inkling is not to put him in a completely different genre. It a natural thing and you try to keep in mind. I’ve turned down many, many Arab roles. When Sleeper Cell came first, I just read a description of being offered a role of the head terrorist of a terrorist cell the first thing I said was “No, I don’t want to do it” but my representative said “Just read the script” and when I read the script there was no way I could turn it down. It was absolutely wonderful.

    CS: I think it was one of your best work. I absolutely agree.

    FEHR: And I would have to agree with you. It’s the best thing I’ve ever done. It was an amazing experience all around ““ working the directors we worked with, the cast, the crew, the writers everything. It was almost a family working together to achieve the same goal. It was great.

    CS: And what did you bring away from that experience? Because it seemed that it was you, just you, just your acting – it wasn’t this bombastic ““ it wasn’t this large character we’ve come to know. What did it teach you about what you can do with a tiny role?

    FEHR: I think it is extremely difficult to say what exactly it is. You learn about the acting aspect about what you can take away for the next time. It’s an internal thing. All of a sudden when you are doing another character you just find it easier to be natural with it.

    All I know is that it was extremely important to me that this character be real ““ somebody that could be your neighbor. I felt that I definitely did not want to do some kind of Hollywood bad guy type of character. I wanted to do somebody who is just somebody that you almost, had it not been for the things he did or does, you’d really like the guy. And that’s what I was going for so therefore he had to be extremely natural just very much driven by his ideals and beliefs and he’s 100% convinced that he was doing the right correct thing. So basically, that’s what I was going for. I don’t think I’ve had the opportunity to play somebody for that length and depth that is so natural and I think I’ve learned a lot from it.

    CS: One more question ““ going forward where I didn’t see anything else coming up on your horizon but certainly as you are contemplating moving forward as a working actor what are some of the things you are hoping to do with your next project and the next one after that? Is there any career path that you want to try to build on going forward?

    FEHR: Well, I just shot a movie with Melissa George up in Vancouver, directed by Amanda Gusack. It’s a very small independent movie for MGM and that was a lot of fun. I’ve never done an independent before. I can’t tell you anything specific.

    I do know that one of my dreams after leaving drama school was to do Shakespeare on stage one day. I come from a very classical type of training and for me that was the biggest challenge as a student actor entering drama school because I knew practically nothing about Shakespeare any of that classical theatre and really learn the language and all that. It was a huge challenge for me and still would be a huge challenge. I would love to conquer that one day by doing some sort of a Shakespeare play. Obviously the problem with that is the commitment it so long that you have to be in a place in your career that you could be taken away for practically a year. But I’d like to do anything ““ anything that’s good. I really enjoy doing TV ““ great TV. I enjoy doing film. I don’t really have anything specific. I just hope for great scripts. They are so scarce.

    CS: I was just going to say, there are some people, some actors who say I’m just a film actor or look at television in a different way ““ not that it’s a lesser form but just something they do not want to do.

    FEHR: It’s rare today that actors do that. There is a very small percentage of actors who do film only. Television today ““ the quality of TV ““ the quality of the story line, writing, the filming, the directing, all of it is so advanced ““ is so close to film now. The challenge on TV nowadays, in my opinion, is as good if not better than film it’s just that you have 8 days to shoot an episode instead of five months to shoot an hour and a half which is a huge difference.

    CS: Oded, thank you so much for your time.

    Special thanks to MAS for the transcription assist.

  • Trailer Park: Ted Rall

    By Christopher Stipp

    Archives? Right Here”¦

    Instead of manning-up and actually going the emotionally hard route of being outrightly rejected by publishers, I’m rejecting them first and allowing you to give my entire book a preview, let you read the whole thing or, if you like, download the whole damn thing at no cost. Download and read my first book “Thank You, Goodnight” for FREE.

    It feels good to be in the presence of someone who makes you want to be a smarter person.

    All through college I appreciated the chance to learn and appreciate what the collegiate system, I thought, was supposed to be about: to sit amidst the free flowing of ideas from various peer groups, the chance to gain wisdom from those who were hardwired to espouse thoughts related to lectures or, ultimately and hopefully, have the possibility to have your knowledge base raised a notch or two after the sixteen weeks was over.

    For me, it was exactly like this. I learned and gleaned just as fast as I could. Unfortunately, I paid the social cost of turning my weekends into extended learning time but there’s something I was frustrated I couldn’t do after I was given my bachelor’s in English: tell you why the world has turned out the way it had. I don’t know why this was such a sticking point with me but, through divine intervention, as I crammed in 12 credit hours in one summer I had to take a sociology class entitled Social Problems. It was taught by Professor Pete Padilla at Arizona State University and it pushed my understanding of the underhanded things or government is capable of to its veritable limit. To understanding what Sea Lines of Communication means to our overall military strategy and how it will impact whether we’ll defend Taiwan in the case of a Chinese assault on that island to the blatant and glaring reality that as long as you have the control you can spin any story you want, even if it’s how the ATF and FBI had a hand with what ultimately happened in Waco, Texas some decade ago.

    The thing is, though, I had my eyes opened to a whole new world and when the class was finished I felt there wasn’t a way for me to keep the intravenous information flowing into me. I was tossed into the Working World and lost my sense of sifting through the messages I was spoon-fed on a daily basis through all forms of media.

    It was about 4 years later when I found Ted Rall.

    Ted was an instant touchstone for me from the standpoint that his cartoons, which somehow sounds awfully minute and insulting when I say it aloud as you compare his work to the other funnies out there for your base amusement, represented something more than just jokes. They were actionable in that they reached out and made you agree with what he was saying or it made you want to scribble down a death threat or two as evidenced by his “Terror Widows” comic which ran five months after September 11th:

    His thoughts almost always have a heft to them when he has something to say. His book, America Gone Wild, showcases some of his own hits and misses with commentary to tell why he’s more than happy to say when he thinks his point wasn’t a very clear one or when something was written too hastily. Ted’s writing some of the most profound commentary on our modern society, with a voice that is unequaled in its ability to attract thunderous protestations from those on both sides of the political arena but, and here’s the most important part, he’s been an active voice against a presidency, the Bush presidency, that knows no limits with how far it will go to lie, cheat or steal its way into your hearts.

    Rall’s disdain for the current administration is certainly out there for all to see in its Generalissimo El Busho glory but it’s also his essays that cut straight to the quick about what’s on his mind with the world or his books on what’s happening in the Mideast or Central Asia. And it’s the latter, entitled Silk Road to Ruin, that I read after picking up at the 2006 San Diego Comic-Con which not only kicked open my closed sensibilities with regard to caring for countries I couldn’t pronounce but it made me acutely and severely aware of what is coming on our political, military and, possibly, environmental horizon with things like Lake Sarez being poised to be our next great world disaster waiting to happen.

    I had the privilege to talk to Ted for a few minutes regarding Lake Sarez, politics, whether Bush is, indeed, the worst president ever, airport security and what it takes to develop an acute sense of reading between the lines we’re fed by an anxious media.

    line3.gif

    trailerpark2007-09-14.jpg

    Download SDCC Ted Rall Interview:

    Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 187.88 MB)
    Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 83.19 MB)

    [display_podcast]

  • Trailer Park: Blair Butler

    By Christopher Stipp

    Archives? Right Here”¦

    Instead of manning-up and actually going the emotionally hard route of being outrightly rejected by publishers, I’m rejecting them first and allowing you to give my entire book a preview, let you read the whole thing or, if you like, download the whole damn thing at no cost. Download and read my first book “Thank You, Goodnight” for FREE.

    One of the nice things about actually going to Comic-Con is that you can sometimes get opinions about comics that don’t come from your average, pale, emaciated comic book shop employee.

    Blair Butler, of Fresh Ink on G4’s Attack of the Show, does readers for all genres of comics a great service by being an objective voice about what’s hype and what what’s hot within the illustrated world. Her thoughts are always interesting if for the reasons that they’re always well reasoned and come from a place of genuine affinity for the art form. The selections she chooses to champion and those that get her occasional barb help to sift through the wheat and chafe. Since there isn’t any one single platform where comics are given an objective arena to be talked about on television, and surely there could be the case that Blair could turn the segment into a full-length show with the amount of titles that are out and come out on a weekly basis, it’s her recommendations that hold the greatest weight with me; it’s due to her that I found DMZ, one of the best titles going today.

    Prior to the interview she was signing autographs with some of the other members of Attack of the Show and it was interesting to see the number of fans that were clamoring for just a few moments with her. She’s the latter day equivalent of a rock star within the context of the convention but couldn’t have been a more interesting and engaging person to talk to about the state of the comic universe. When I finally sat down with her we talked about what’s been good to read, conventions in general and the nature of the superhero genre.

    You can catch Blair with a varying degree of certainty on G4’s Attack of the Show which airs nightly or you can catch all her most recent installment of Fresh Ink over at G4’s website.

    line3.gif

    blairbutler-01.jpg

    Download SDCC Blair Butler Interview:

    Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 83.27 MB)
    Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 36.27 MB)

    [display_podcast]

  • Trailer Park: BALLS OF FURY

    By Christopher Stipp

    Archives? Right Here”¦

    Instead of manning-up and actually going the emotionally hard route of being outrightly rejected by publishers, I’m rejecting them first and allowing you to give my entire book a preview, let you read the whole thing or, if you like, download the whole damn thing at no cost. Download and read my first book “Thank You, Goodnight” for FREE.

    Hijacked.

    Hijacked is the only way I can explain how the final moments of this interview went. Specifically speaking, and without looking at the tape to be sure, I remember talking to Ben and Thomas about BALLS OF FURY and then a wandering James “David Lo Pan” Hong comes right into the room and just devolves the moment into one big question mark about what just happened.

    The looks on both Thomas’ and Ben’s faces were priceless as I would say mine was with the exception that I was the guy working the camera. I know there was a lot of apologizing going around but it wasn’t necessary in the slightest; it was equal parts bizarre and hilarious.

    Much like BALLS OF FURY.

    The movie, which really seems like one complete extension of the idea of what would happen if you made a film about competitive table tennis, mixed in some classic Christopher Walken goodness and set the whole thing to a raging Def Leppard soundtrack. You can’t really go wrong with a comedy that takes itself so seriously when it comes to its premise and executes it with the subtle funny we’re used to getting out of the creative minds behind the production.

    BALLS OF FURY is currently at theaters everywhere.

    line3.gif

    trailerpark-balls-2007-08-31.jpg

    Download SDCC Balls of Fury Interview:

    Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 83.27 MB)
    Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 36.27 MB)

    [display_podcast]

  • Trailer Park: DEATH SENTENCE

    By Christopher Stipp

    Archives? Right Here”¦

    Instead of manning-up and actually going the emotionally hard route of being outrightly rejected by publishers, I’m rejecting them first and allowing you to give my entire book a preview, let you read the whole thing or, if you like, download the whole damn thing at no cost. Download and read my first book “Thank You, Goodnight” for FREE.

    I’ll be upfront about it: it was a really nice breakfast.

    Atop a pavilion, overlooking San Diego’s convention center and the trickling of the faithful waiting to get an early jump on the festivities, the intimate breakfast that was hosted to introduce the day’s events for Fox Atomic’s DEATH SENTENCE held the kind of curiosity I could not resist.

    Here was a director, James Wan, known for his viscous visuals with the original that started a mega franchise, SAW, the likes of which no one was expecting to happen, and had continued on that trend with his other notable film, DEAD SILENCE before landing on a project that is slightly askew of what people would be expecting next.

    The film delves into the kind of revenge convention that spans generations and continents and it was, honestly, the first time I saw a trailer that got me excited about a Kevin Bacon movie since THE WOODSMAN and reinvigorated my belief that a balls-out action film can’t hold a candle to kinetic action if it’s done with a sense of purposeful film making. I could be wrong on all sorts of levels, of course, but from the footage that I saw prior to the interview I was struck by the way Wan has taken the action convention and twisted it just enough to have the sense that there is something at stake for all involved. It’s no longer just one person against the world but what happens when that one person just gives in for once into the restorative power of getting a little payback.

    The interviews themselves lend more credence to the idea that this is really a new interpretation of the trope which suggests the what if of a man taking things into his own hands and is really driven to take things to their ultimate end. James Wan couldn’t have been more open and eager to talk about the major things which drove him through the production of the film and Garrett Hedlund was equally engaging talking about what he did in order to find that space where he no longer was just the pretty faced love interest in GEORGIA RULE and had to be the guy that everyone loves to hate.

    DEATH SENTENCE opens August 31st. See it and experience the vengeful love.

    line3.gif

    Clip #1: James Wan talks about the evolution from horror to dramatic action and what he felt should be the essence of the picture.

    trailerpark-death-2007-08-24-01.jpg

    Download SDCC Death Sentence Interview #1 – James Wan:

    Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 65.41 MB)
    Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 29.03 MB)

    line3.gif

    Clip #2: Garrett Hedlund spins a yarn about achieving a real sense of badass-ness in this film while reflecting on his experience in the picture.

    trailerpark-death-2007-08-24-02.jpg

    Download SDCC Death Sentence Interview #2 – Garrett Hedlund:

    Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 83.27 MB)
    Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 36.27 MB)

    line3.gif

  • Trailer Park: MONSTER SQUAD

    By Christopher Stipp

    Archives? Right Here”¦

    Instead of manning-up and actually going the emotionally hard route of being outrightly rejected by publishers, I’m rejecting them first and allowing you to give my entire book a preview, let you read the whole thing or, if you like, download the whole damn thing at no cost. Download and read my first book “Thank You, Goodnight” for FREE.

    Before the advent of DVD audio rippers made it fun again to listen to a good audio commentary while not enslaved to your La-Z-Boy there was the good old cassette recorder.

    When I was old enough to rent movies but not sophisticated enough to know how to rig them up to one another to make a copy of it (not that I ever did that, legally speaking) I used to take a portable boom box and actually *record* the audio of the movies I really liked. I don’t know why I did this, nor why I incessantly looped major portions of POLICE ACADEMY 4: CITIZENS ON PATROL on my GE Walkman. I do know, however, that I filled up a couple of tapes when it came to THE MONSTER SQUAD.

    I loved this film.

    I recorded the dialog, the up-tempo musical interlude as the squad gets ready to throw down, the great moments Rudy gets as the “tough kid”, everything. I never listened to a recording so many times as I did with my MONSTER SQUAD tape. The film, in an odd way, encapsulated of what it was like to be a goofy young kid admist an ostensibly scary situation; that’s the movie’s appeal all these years later. Fred Dekker walked that line of genuine scariness and abject absurdness with equal parts. You couldn’t have found a more balanced film of this variety and somehow I responded to it with rapt dedication for a while.

    I guess, as the years went on, I kind of forgot about the film. I started watching other movies, evolved as a movie consumer, but there was always something about that story; it turned out to be a touchstone, though, and when decades later there was talk about bringing the movie to DVD I just couldn’t wait. The very same feelings I had as a youth came bubbling back when I was given the opportunity to interview director Fred Dekker and cast members Andre Gower, Ryan Lambert and Ashley Bank. It was a surreal moment, to be sure, and it was definitely a satisfying moment knowing that years ago this was a movie I told everyone about and now I’m in the position to be able and tell everyone that this is the DVD to own this year.

    Halcyon days of youth don’t have anything on the experience of being able to revel in the geekery of revisiting this film 20 years later with those who made it so good to watch long ago.

    line3.gif

    Clip #1: Director Fred Dekker talks about the mechanics of getting MONSTER SQUAD filmed and whether the adage of working with kids and animals really holds any truth.

    trailerpark-monster-01.jpg

    Download SDCC Monster Squad Interview #1 – Fred Dekker:

     

    Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 76.11 MB)
    Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 34.45 MB)

     

    line3.gif

    Clip #2: Ashley Bank talks about what memories she has of the production and what it was like to be a part of the resurgence of the movie-that-would-not-die.

    trailerpark-monster-02.jpg

    Download SDCC Monster Squad Interview #2 – Ashley Bank:

     

    Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 34.24 MB)
    Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 15.60 MB)

     

    line3.gif

    Clip #3: Andre Gower and Ryan Lambert remember back about the experience of being young on the set of a major motion picture.


    trailerpark-monster-03.jpg

    Download SDCC Monster Squad Interview #3 – Andre Gower & Ryan Lambert:

     

    Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 114.53 MB)
    Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 50.23 MB)

    ##

  • Trailer Park: Just Laying The Groundwork

    By Christopher Stipp

    Archives? Right Here”¦

    Instead of manning-up and actually going the emotionally hard route of being outrightly rejected by publishers, I’m rejecting them first and allowing you to give my entire book a preview, let you read the whole thing or, if you like, download the whole damn thing at no cost. Download and read my first book “Thank You, Goodnight” for FREE.

    Note #2: I make an appearance on my first ever Podcast with ScreenGeeks Radio right here. I got to talk a little bit about the trials and tribulations of enduring Comic-Con this year and just had a good time talking with Barry, Josh and Dave. Good people and they were really fun to chat with.

    I swear I’ll tie this all back to RENO 911’s Ben Garant and Thomas Lennon.

    One of the things I like to do with my time is keep up with what’s going on in the media through programs like Studio 360 and On The Media on NPR. A recent edition of OTM, though, had a rousing discussion of the changing paradigms of summer reading lists in the college system. Now, while I figured most reading lists were for us plebes in the English studies there was a mention that other departments were getting into the mix. Books that have a larger worldwide context are where things are going, essentially. Instead of just our notion that America is king and we should only be concerning ourselves with America is becoming outmoded in favor of a global perspective. This brings us to today’s topic of one of the things that were brought up during the story: Barack Obama’s book “Dreams from My Father” was once a part of many university’s reading lists but, with his run for the White House, that book has been shuffled off many a list because some academics at one school thought having young freshman read it would be taken as a sign of “tacit endorsement.”

    Obviously, as I write this, there are many of you who never went to college, never plan on going to college, plan on going to some college advertised between episodes of Judge Joe Brown or are ramping up to another year full of learning, social mixing, sexual hijinks and self-exploitation. The one thread that weaves right through all of you, though, is that as a group you are lazy, indifferent, apathetic, listless and every other adjective for roustabout the Oxford English Dictionary has on file. In short, politicians love you because you represent an overwhelmingly large population that has an inverse proportion of voter turnout. For all your hippie talks about changing the world, for all your thoughts of thinking you know how to do things differently, for every grandiose idea of how life will be different you might as well say it to a wall because no one will ever listen to you. You’re pathetic as a group because you’re all talk and no action. You might as well be the big dog down the street on a leash and chain who wakes everyone up in the middle of the night because you can’t shut the hell up as the neighbors wonder how to poison your Gaines Burgers.

    In an effort to try and do something, anything, to help get the youth voters out there a little more engaged hallowed television producer Norman Lear (some would say ALL IN THE FAMILY was his crowning achievement I would point to GOOD TIMES, SILVER SPOONS and DIFF’RENT STROKES) has created DECLARE YOURSELF, a site that is the anchor for a major multimedia push heading toward the 2008 election that is a, “nonpartisan, nationwide campaign to empower every 18-year-old in America to register & vote in the 2008 election.” It’s going to partner with sites like MySpace, Yahoo!, Google, YouTube, Comedy Central and vanguards in fashion and sports to help get the word out about making your vote count.

    Myself? I don’t know. You 18 year-olds have proven, time and time again, even with campaigns like Rock The Vote and Vote Or Die that you’re a lazy lot who just didn’t care about giving away your personal freedoms over to one of the worst presidents of our time, a hillbilly who thinks nothing of running roughshod over international law, to a vice-president who would sooner turn over the personal information of a member of the CIA because of a personal grudge, and to an instigator of an illegal war that you all obviously care nothing about, statistically speaking.

    Go on, young people, and enjoy your US Weekly, your Entertainment Tonight, your unlimited quantities of Mountain Dew: Code Red, your tickets to the latest emo band rocking your packed iPod, your unlimited text messaging (OMFG!), your Colbert Report reruns and let the adults continue to determine how rude of an awakening you’re in for when you have to join the rest of us in the real world.

    If you care at all about where you can at least appear somewhat intelligent in conversations about which politician you might might do the least damage to your life once you leave the safe confines of your brick and mortar university get over to DECLARE YOURSELF and enjoy the video that is Ben Garant and Thomas Lennon in one of the best videos I have ever seen that sums up everything pretty well.

    I completely support youth campaigns like this one and if it honestly can get a few of you to wake up from your adolescent slumber it is well worth the effort to get you out and vote.

    RISE: BLOOD HUNTER (2007)

    Director: Sebastian Gutierrez
    Cast: Lucy Liu, Michael Chiklis, Carla Gugino, James D’Arcyn
    Release: Hopefully on its way to a glue farm in Pahrump, NV.
    Synopsis: Sadie (Liu) is an investigative reporter who stumbles upon a dark underground cult that is attracting young Los Angeles hipsters. Lured in by the promise of wild parties, these kids start turning up dead, and when Sadie tries to get to the bottom of their gruesome murders, she becomes a victim herself. She awakens in the morgue, neither dead nor alive, consumed by an overwhelmed craving for blood, and hell-bent on finding the twisted killers that made her this way.

    View Trailer:
    * Large (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: So Negative I Can Only Laugh. Can anyone out there remember when the best lead-in for a preview told you that it is brought to you by the Producers of a second-rate horror adaptation?

    If other movies have to jump over hurdles to get you to buy, the proclamation that this film was produced by the Producers who brought us all the American-ized version of THE GRUDGE this movie just hopes you roll over these speed bumps.

    But, that’s neither here nor there, as we got a dead body being wheeled into a morgue space, even has the requisite meat locker, so that’s cool, right? We even are told that the writer of GOTHIKA is on the case for this as well. Hey wait, the meat locker morgue door is kicked open! That’s scary. Man, the love keeps coming”¦

    I really don’t know why the bush-league effect of blazing through dozens of scenes at one time is supposed to be a dramatic moment but this just does a disservice to the person trying to comprehend what the film is supposed to be about.

    True, this isn’t a movie that’s going to teach me about particle physics but I want some context and, sadly, this is denied.

    “Everything happens for a reason.”

    You know, on second thought, second look and second time around, I think it’s better to use the confused approach because the truth isn’t very exciting. Besides getting some extended shots of some bra and panty action (the one good thing about this trailer as they understand only 12 year-old boys will gravitate to this production) we’re given one of the lamest set-ups ever for a film: horny couple, one a nympho and the other a swarthy European dirt dag (but, really, aren’t they all?), kill Lu only to have her not be killed and then comes back for revenge.

    KILL BILL, THE CROW, CATWOMAN, take your pick about which movie this movie sounds like.

    Oh, now we get that it’s a vampire movie without the deep pale contacts. Chiklis gets involved, I’m thinking as a disgraced/out-of-control/maverick cop because that’s what cops are in these kinds of films, and it takes a turn for the worse as the trailer just tries weakly to ballast itself with more girls in bras and panties; if I wasn’t so beyond this kind of marketing I would say this is the best trailer ever.

    However, what we’re given as an audience is a jumbled mess of a trailer that doesn’t really explain much. Suffering from MTV syndrome of not letting your eye rest for more than 1.3 seconds as we barrel toward the end of this thing we get Liu’s horrific hair style and mannerisms of some kind of bad ass, something that Quentin Tarantino managed to pull off without nary a question of doubt, but it simply doesn’t work here. The crossbow gun is a nice, comedic touch, as is the Liu lesbian moment (they really know what demo is going to troll on over to see this movie) seems like a desperate grab for attention.

    If the best thing I take away from this preview is that I hope Carla Gugino unleashes her wet flour sacks once more in this film then I think your trailer, and movie, are in trouble.

    THE BROTHERS SOLOMON (2007)

    Director: Bob Odenkirk
    Cast:
    Will Arnett, Will Forte, Chi McBride, Malin Akerman, Kristin Wiig
    Release: September 7, 2007
    Synopsis: THE BROTHERS SOLOMON tells the hilarious story of Dean and John Solomon (Forte and Arnett), two good-hearted but romantically-challenged brothers. When they find out their dying father’s last wish is for a grandchild, the brothers set out to find someone to have a baby with. But after spending their formative years being home-schooled by their father in a remote arctic location, their social skills prove to be somewhat lacking and their attempts at fatherhood go hysterically and disastrously wrong.

    View Trailer:
    * Large (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Positive. I don’t know why I keep coming back to this well of a trailer but I’m pretty sure it has everything to do with Will Arnett.

    And Todd Rundgren. I’m a fan of “Bang on the Drum.” Huge fan.

    What’s extraordinary about this trailer is that we’re launched right into the funny. There are no extended conceits with a serious voiceover that eventually yanks the “gotcha!” curtain that anyone with an 8 IQ and a self-regulating respiratory system can detect with a high-degree of certainty and that’s appreciated. This trailer just lays it out with Todd backing it all up.

    I like the unflattering still shots of both Wills to introduce them to us; they are excellent in setting the tone for all those watching this thing. The home school snippet, showing us proto-looking church kids, is an excellent dovetail to the just sheer absurd nature of these guys’ lives. From the dart in the nose to the set-up, that the boys Solomon have a rough time with the ladies, just proves how well a trailer can convey information if you’re just smart about what you’re doing and presenting.

    Now, even though the obvious lift of Tracey Morgan’s line about putting a baby in you is about as blatant as a blinking neon sign, Will makes it work. El otro Will spins the premise of trying to get a baby made for the 60 Million Dollar Man with just enough subtlety that Jenna Fischer’s quick moment to inject her gift for situational comedy in this trailer works exceptionally well.

    Like the movie itself I am sure there will be a scorecard of how many hits and misses there were. In this trailer, though, there are some things that don’t work exceptionally well but the obvious go-to for a giggle, the sperm bank, is the grounds for a quick one-liner that actually feels fresh.

    The moment where the Wills try to coax a girl into their car after they were told to spend some time with children in order to learn how to be good parents? Solid. The infant mortality moment? Eh, not so much.

    There is a lot to be said to how to sell a comedy. It really is like perfume: not everyone can agree as to what’s funny or worth watching. The trailer here isn’t earth-shatteringly great but in a time of lameness in how we’re being sold this, that or the other thing this looks pretty good for a matinée.

    THE DARJEELING LIMITED (2007)

    Director: Wes Anderson
    Cast: Owen Wilson, Adrien Brody, Jason Schwartzman, Anjelica Huston
    Release: September 29, 2007
    Synopsis: An emotional comedy about three brothers re-forging family bonds. The eldest, played by Wilson, hopes to reconnect with his two younger siblings by taking them on a train trip across the vibrant and sensual landscape of India.

    View Trailer:
    * Large (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Positive. Where’s the love?

    Sure, THE LIFE AQUATIC seemed to miss the mark a smidge but that’s no reason to think that this movie is going down the same route just because some think that this trailer is a little esoteric.

    I would go on record as saying that I think this trailer is actually quite engaging in the way it not only explains itself but in the way it endears you to all three of these men.

    First, I can’t say enough about how nice that we get a quick clip of Owen just laying it right out in the open for us to understand: this is a road movie. Simple enough but it trumps so many other attempts by studios to be as vague as possible so it doesn’t have to commit to any one angle.

    As the music slowly starts to slide in and we see the faces of our three men, I only take compunction with Adrien Brody for his corporate cock sucking in the name of Coca-Cola, I hope to come around though, we have been introduced without ever knowing their names. When Owen says that he wants these men who we come to know as brothers to come back together again we obviously set in motion some tension. There isn’t a reason given as to why Owen looks like he got worked by a meat grinder but there’s some sincerity that this road trip is being done in order to bring harmony back to their lives.

    Among the details and the tight sense of space there is also the absurd. I can’t help but to admit laughing when the train operator stops the trip in order to let it be known he’s lost. Jason Schwartzman’s question isn’t so much funny as it is just a matter-of-fact statement that feels humorous.

    Even though we’re not given much I can still tell that there is something that Owen wants more than anything, togetherness, that Brody is somewhat accepting of it all and that Jason is the one brother who doesn’t process emotion as quickly as his two other brothers. I feel like we’ve been given enough and the musical interlude just serves as a travelogue of how these things come together.

    Jason’s question about how their relationships would have been different had they been people, and not brothers, was a poignant way to end this trailer but it’s something that cannot be overlooked: this trailer doesn’t state much but it says everything it needs to.

    Next time anyone says that the trailer feels too esoteric I am giving you the right to nipple twist that jackhole into submission.

  • Trailer Park: See SUPERBAD Next Weekend. It’s Good Just For McLovin.

    By Christopher Stipp

    Archives? Right Here”¦

    Instead of manning-up and actually going the emotionally hard route of being outrightly rejected by publishers, I’m rejecting them first and allowing you to give my entire book a preview, let you read the whole thing or, if you like, download the whole damn thing at no cost. Download and read my first book “Thank You, Goodnight” for FREE.

    Before I launch into the mess of Comic-Con coverage that I have brought back with me, and as other people unleash their loads from the event in a spray without regard to any kind of context, I wanted to squeeze a few trailer reviews into this space.

    This week marks the first time I was able to catch the NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN trailer and I cannot believe it took me this long to feel this movie’s flavor. While the title is a little thick to swallow I was absolutely taken by how much the movie looks like it’s the Coens back to their old tried and true ways. It’s one thing to bring the noise against these guys for films like LADYKILLERS, saying that they lost something along their way, but just looking at the trailer and nothing else you’ve got to admit there could be some kind of good-will offered as Javier Bardem slithers across the screen.

    One movie I did see and have to absolutely make sure I make my opinion known about is SUPERBAD. Starting next week this movie is one that just has to be seen to be believed. While I won’t really get into a compare and contrast, SAT style, argument as to why I believe that KNOCKED UP really is not quite deserving of the title of greatest-est comedy of the summer I can give that honor to SUPERBAD. Infused with the kind of adolescent frivolity and sailor blue language I can definitely relate to the movie is an absolute raucous affair. From McLovin to the HOUSE PARTY style cops (read here: inept, a smidge racist and completely crazy) that made that hip-hop production one of my Top 10 of all time the movie just does not disappoint even as the movie strays into some unbelievable territory in the 3rd act. You cannot go wrong for a mid-August release when the landscape is littered with stink bombs that studios dump like it was a temporal landfill in need of crap films.

    CHALK (2006)

    Director: Mike Akel
    Cast: Troy Schremmer, Jannelle Schremmer, Shannon Haragan
    Release: Coming to a film festival near you Synopsis: In the comedic style of The Office and the films of Christopher Guest, Chalk is a spirited portrait of life in the trenches of that most honorable and frustrating profession…teaching. It’s the start of a memorable new year at Harrison High. The self-conscious Mr. Stroope is convinced that his time has come–this year he will be furnished with the golden title of “Teacher of the Year”, if only his smarter students would stop using words that he can’t understand. Peek into Mr. Lowrey’s History class and you’ll see that he’s struggling to even call himself a teacher. Woefully inept due to a complete lack of experience and social skills, he earnestly stutters his way through class. The only interaction his students offer him is when they steal his chalk. Men aren’t much interested in the spunky and officious Coach Webb, but “not all P.E. teachers are gay” and she pines for some romantic company. Her once best friend, the newly appointed assistant principal, Mrs. Reddell, doesn’t seem to have time for her either, as her new power post is all-consuming; battling egos, enduring teacher conferences and her lighthouse-obsessed boss. Coach Webb wonders if her former confidante has forgotten just how hard teaching really is. Director Mike Akel provides a rare and realistic teacher’s perspective into the absurd, provocative, and occasionally volatile world of public education. In a country where 50% of teachers quit within the first three years, CHALK delivers an enormous dose of heart, hilarity, and hope for America’s most important institution.

    View Trailer:
    * Large (YouTube)

    Prognosis: Positive. When I graduated with my Master’s in Adult Education and Distance Learning I had dreams of being able to shape young minds at a collegiate level. I loved the idea of presenting ways in which to correlate literature with the human experience, no matter what decade or century the work was created. Timelessness, that was going to be my approach.

    Then I saw the pay scale.

    Thanks to my secondary abilities I have since held my educational dreams at bay if for the only reason than I could never hope to maximize the amount of money I could make and this trailer just puts that out there.

    From the start we’re blasted with the starting pay for a teacher: roughly 30g’s. It’s pathetic but it’s the teacher who’s couched behind a piano we’ve all been exposed to, that orange-ish ghetto model that was never in tune, and is belting out her own ditty to the beat of “The Safety Dance.” It’s bizarre and funny at the same time.

    Quickly, we’re inside a classroom where we get the daily chaos we expect these modern day saints to endure. Just as fast we’re sitting down with an assistant principal who explains the guilty verdict against the person who used to hold her position and, for an independent film, it’s obviously clear we’re going the faux verite route. Yes, it’s been done a few times before but no one’s explored the world of the public school system and it’s intriguing.

    “Number of public school teachers: 3.066,270″¦Number of public school students: 48,369,740″

    What’s of note here isn’t so much about the explosiveness of the trailer but the way in which it’s put together. We get to know some of the people who inhabit this world, the attitudinal maladjusted teacher, the gym teacher who everyone thinks is gay and the teacher who likes to shoot guns in order to relieve “stress.”

    “50% of all teachers quit within the first 3 years.”

    What becomes apparent is the various ways in which these teachers deal with the pressures that causes so many to leave within the first three years, the critical moments when they either see if they’ve got it for life or have enough of it before it gets too late.

    And I have to point out, for anyone who can understand, the bit at the end where the teacher with a really bad attitude starts querying the students in his class as to the whereabouts of his chalk not only strikes a nostalgic vein from SUMMER SCHOOL but I can see these little minions of Satan’s underworld actually doing it in real life now; it’s no longer a bit but a full-fledged possible reality in which we live today.

    What’s more about this trailer is the very end when one of the teachers declares, “I wish I had the guts to leave.” This not only hits a comedic chord but it also feels very real when you think back to your own youthful days remembering the moments when you were stuck with a teacher who you knew was not only completely inept but tragically stuck in a position they just couldn’t leave.

    3:10 TO YUMA (2007)

    Director: James Mangold
    Cast:
    Russell Crowe, Christian Bale, Peter Fonda, Gretchen Mol, Dallas Roberts, Ben Foster, Vinessa Shaw, Johnny Whitworthn
    Release: October 5, 2007
    Synopsis: In Arizona in the late 1800’s, infamous outlaw Ben Wade (Crowe) and his vicious gang of thieves and murderers have plagued the Southern Railroad. When Wade is captured, Civil War veteran Dan Evans (Christian Bale), struggling to survive on his drought-plagued ranch, volunteers to deliver him alive to the “3:10 to Yuma”, a train that will take the killer to trial. On the trail, Evans and Wade, each from very different worlds, begin to earn each other’s respect. But with Wade’s outfit on their trail ““ and dangers at every turn ““ the mission soon becomes a violent, impossible journey toward each man’s destiny.

    View Trailer:
    * Large (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Positive. For some, the answer is: Everything but country.

    When asked what kind of music I like I usually resort to the answer above and then expound on the motifs and tropes of daddy hitting mama on the farm, wife leaving in the middle of the night, ol’ huntin’ dog being run over by your Ford-350 and that’s usually where I leave my feelings about country music.

    You can’t get away from what the old west used to be and the trappings that went with it, the lifestyle, the pathos, the way Deadwood tried to capture it but I’ve always resorted to tossing Westerns in the sack with the kinds of films I would opt to watch last if ever given the chance to view something else. I haven’t seen DANCES WITH WOLVES, TOMBSTONE, UNFORGIVEN and scads of other horse-drawn classics just for the sheer nature of the world I am usually going to land in but this film feels different. It looks different.

    Mangold made me a believer in the musical genre with WALK THE LINE and it feels here like he’s trying to spin something new that has old for far too long.

    The opening sequence here is off-putting. The zig-zagging camera angles and use of black screen seem almost too much until you realize that there is a real sense of badness conveyed in the actions of Russell “I’ve Never Met A Phone I Didn’t Like”¦Or Mind Shattering On Some Bloke’s Skull” Crowe. There’s actually some momentum created in the act of the old time stick-up and the appearance of Christian Bale who feels like a genuine figure in his own right.

    I’m not quite sure I get the reason or why Bale volunteers to bring the man to the, wait for it, 3:10 to Yuma, or why the hell Yuma of all places. I’ve been through Yuma, you can get some kick ass oranges and produce up in that piece, holmes. Regardless of the vegetable situation in that area I am stumped at why this train ride is so important but, nonetheless, there is a sense of trepidation about this prisoner transfer and Russell can’t help but be himself as he flashes that too good to be true Zoom Whitening smile when the idea of him getting away now becomes a possibility.

    The mix in with Bale’s kid tagging along in an “Aw, shucks” sort of way, and this will obviously become a contentious issue when and if the kid gets shot, I put money on the fact he will, seems little forced and doesn’t make me more anxious to find out what happens next.

    What does, though, make me want to know more is when we see the marauders, Russell’s old crew on the horizon as they plan to set their master free. The chaos that follows is what absolutely gets my attention.

    There seems to be an emphasis in this trailer on the violent standoff that happens at the end, the falling off roofs is something I can relate to with all too nauseating clarity from all the faux western towns in this hell hole of a state I live in, and the guitar A-chord that’s struck doesn’t inspire true confidence but Mangold has bought my goodwill with WALK and there seems like a sliver’s chance that there’s something more to this film than just rolling tumbleweed.

    .

    NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN (2007)

    Director: Joel Coen
    Cast: Tommy Lee Jones, Javier Bardem, Josh Brolin, Woody Harrelson, Stephen Root
    Release: November 21, 2007
    Synopsis: Based on the Cormac McCarthy’s novel “Old Men”, the story begins when Llewelyn Moss (Brolin) finds a pickup truck surrounded by a sentry of dead men. A load of heroin and two million dollars in cash are still in the back. When Moss takes the money, he sets off a chain reaction of catastrophic violence that not even the law – in the person of aging, disillusioned Sheriff Bell (Jones) – can contain. As Moss tries to evade his pursuers – in particular a mysterious mastermind who flips coins for human lives (Bardem) – the film simultaneously strips down the American crime drama and broadens its concerns to encompass themes as ancient as the Bible and as bloodily contemporary as this morning’s headlines.

    View Trailer:
    * Large (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Positively Black. Funny thing about the Coen’s.

    When they released RAISING ARIZONA in 1987 it wasn’t until it made its way to HBO before I ever came upon anything they’ve done theatrically. Most people remember the oddest things when they’re kids but I remember being 12 and being utterly enamored in not only their vibe, I instantly “got” their method of storytelling, but in the nuances that have made more hits than misses. I remember thinking that wherever in hell Tempe, Arizona was, the stated location for country lockup for H.I. McDunnough, that it must have been a barren wasteland of a few QuickTrips and home to the most hideous grocery store ever created. Who knew that I would someday move there and graduate from that fine city with a college degree? What I can be certain of, though, is that I can see the very same sense of place and time in this trailer that I did in ARIZONA.

    “What’s the most you’ve ever lost on a coin toss?”

    This trailer crackles with nuance and spatial permanence from the very moment Javier Bardem drawls across the screen. His voice scratches just slightly and the environment that’s interposed against it just quakes with desolation and isolation. What so many people in marketing camps all over Los Angeles vie for, garnering interest from people in their film, this trailer just achieves by setting a mood and letting it unspool like a fist of yarn.

    I completely get what this movie is about and I didn’t need a voiceover to tell me. The film has a catchy premise, it’s so easy to understand that I can’t see how you can’t fall in love with the notion right from the start, especially how the car explosion mid-way through this thing lets you know we are not in FARGO country.

    The tension is there, right in front of us, and as Javier chokes a man on a tile floor with his eyes crazed like a fox I am struck by how much idiosyncrasy this movie has but how that odd-ness translates into my buy-in that this is a very real place and a very real story.

    I can believe fully in the quickening near the end that this movie is more of a cat and mouse thriller, that’s how it’s being sold, but I cannot help but see that what’s really at stake in this movie is not how much I believe that these people exist but that the Coen’s have found their way back after a string of detestable films that not even a die-hard could let pass as acceptable.

    Having Javier end this thing in a creepy pose in a creepy chair in a creepy room? Brilliant. I haven’t seen one frame of this movie and already I’m afraid for my own life with this guy nearby.

  • Trailer Park: Buying My Time

    By Christopher Stipp

    Archives? Right Here…

    Instead of putting off and putting off and putting off my vow to somehow market my first book I am letting people download my first book for free. Give it a preview, read the whole thing or, if you like what you see, send me some kind words or donation for the actual book. Download and read my “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE.

    Ok, children…I’m finally back after the Con and I am just spent. Really, I got home last Sunday and still haven’t found the kind of energy that kept me going for twelve straight hours a day as I was working the floor. Here then are some of my half-assed highlights from Comic-Con 2007:

    A) I find it very amusing that, in this space, mere months ago, I bagged on the SUPERBAD trailer. I honestly could not find one iota of inspiration within its 2 and 1/2 minute frame. Now that I am back from Comic-Con I can say it was one of the best comedies I’ve seen this year, even better than the over-hyped KNOCKED UP. Just an observation.

    B) Two words: Press Line. I know there are hundreds of us around the Con and by us I do mean journalists. I don’t think it would be that much of an imposition for there to be a few seats in order to help those of us who aren’t in the studio’s pocket and need a little courtesy to cover a story. That’s fine, though, the way it is now. All I know is that if I can’t see it, I can’t cover it.

    C) The bread that I broke with the cast of G4 was perhaps one of the better memories I will carry with me in all the years I have done this. All I can say was that that the cheese plate was delicious.

    D) Big ups to Rogue Pictures for hosting one great breakfast in support of DEATH SENTENCE, directed by James Wan of SAW fame, on Saturday morning. Not only was this a well-managed event but it put this film on my radar as one that I must/have-to check out.

    E) While a lot of other sites were busy chasing their need for exclusive A-list material, I am genuinely pleased at the coverage for MONSTER SQUAD I obtained.

    F) Missy Peregrym. I’ve talked to her once, twice and now three times; you’ll feel her flavor soon enough again right in this space.

    G) I am glad I ditched the audio interviewing in lieu of video. You’re all going to be subjected to video of my Ray Romano-esque voice as I chat up those who I met; Blair Butler was absolutely wonderful.

    Z) If there are any writers out there who tell you that Comic-Con is an overblown affair almost not worth covering needs to be checked into the boards by a rabid mongoloid on ice with a hardwood hockey stick. Yes, you can make a case for all things lame and all things sucky and all things shitty but to be perfectly honest there was a sense of geek delight to be able and partake, and report on, everything I was privy to because I know there are people who only get the lo-fi experience; they have to stand in line, they don’t get to do 1:1s with anyone, they have to endure being huddled in with the rest of the crowd, they don’t get invited to parties and they sure don’t get invited to press screenings. If I were to go as a casual fan I would dream of being able to do what I did last weekend. I’ll be honest: It was nice to be recognized as an actual writer, reporter, on events going on and there is really nothing that can compare to having a little recognition and respect tossed my way when I got introduced as a, “writer for Kevin Smith’s….”

    Comic-Con was absolutely still worth it…even though I did get shafted for being able to see that footage for IRON MAN. That part sucked. That part I would give back. Everything else, though, was golden. Sorta.

    I AM LEGEND (2007)

    Director: Francis Lawrence
    Cast:
    Will Smith, Alice Braga, Salli Richardson-Whitfield, Willow Smith, Charlie Tahan Olsen
    Release: December 14, 2007
    Synopsis:
    Robert Neville (Will Smith) is a brilliant scientist, but even he could not contain the terrible virus that was unstoppable, incurable”¦and manmade. Somehow immune, Neville is now the last human survivor in what is left of New York City…and maybe the world. But he is not alone. He is surrounded by “the Infected” – victims of the plague who have mutated into carnivorous beings who can only exist in the dark and who will devour or infect anyone or anything in their path. For three years, Neville has spent his days scavenging for food and supplies and faithfully sending out radio messages, desperate to find any other survivors who might be out there.

    All the while, the Infected lurk in the shadows, watching Neville’s every move, waiting for him to make a fatal mistake. Perhaps mankind’s last, best hope, Neville is driven by only one remaining mission: to find a way to reverse the effects of the virus using his own immune blood. But his blood is also what The Infected hunt, and Neville knows he is outnumbered and quickly running out of time.

    View Trailer:
    * Medium (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Positive. I know I’m not the only one who finds Will Smith, when he’s being Will Smith, to be an utterly exacerbating rash in a film.

    Sure, you can have Will Smith being Will Smith in INDEPENDENCE DAY and not mind so much because, really, everyone else is half-assing it as well; even Jeff Goldblum isn’t as creepy as is his want.

    This all said, however, I find his turn in this trailer refreshing to the point that the man has some resonance long after you’ve seen it. I found myself thinking, ensconced in the confusion of what I was watching. For those who have no idea of what it is, do yourselves a favor and not look before you leap into this preview. What makes the moments here so compelling are the purposeful ways in which information is withheld from us as an audience.

    For instance, y por ejemplo, you’ve got Will curled up inside a bathtub with a shotgun splayed across his shoulders and legs. We don’t know what the deal is or why the odd sleeping position, I can only imagine the crink that not even a vat of Icy Hot would be able to get out the following morning, although maybe he’s one of those drunken guys who have sunk to chugging green rubbing alcohol in the bathroom. It could happen.

    Will’s voiceover isn’t as grating as you would think. He’s reserved, pulled back, and this is just a treat to be able and hear because there is no need for him to “project” to anyone. The visuals, as well, compliment the action on the screen as chaotic as it is: there’s a city in full-on evacuation mode, a la INDEPENDENCE DAY, and of course there is a wife and kid involved, none of which I am guessing is going to make it past the 1st act. (We need our heroes to have lived and lost in order for them to seem compelling!)

    What I like, what I really like about this trailer is the total clusterfuck that the incoming missiles do to the narrative. For you eggheads who read you already know what’s what but, for me, I liked the anomie, the chaos, and the eventual quiet that follows. The aftermath of what seems like a thermonuclear war that has devastated everything and everyone. It’s a brilliant rendering and I am quite impressed that Johnny Voiceover didn’t come running into the room to spoil the fun.

    “Day 1001″

    Now, again, Will gets behind the mic to continue the voiceover and I couldn’t be more impressed at the restraint. As he moves through a barren and hollow New York City I can’t help but feel actual trepidation as he skulks his way with his pump action friend at the ready. And I have no clue, still, about what he’s so on guard for but you feel something under the surface.

    The end, where you know there is something hiding in the darkness? This is where the payoff just comes right you. Yeah, you don’t see what’s coming or what it is that has Will so uptight but so what. There’s enough here to warrant the feeling that this is a movie worth keeping track of.

    SICKO (2007)

    Director: Michael Moore
    Cast:
    Michael Moore
    Release: Now Playing…At A Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Site Near You
    Synopsis: Following on the heels of his award winning hit “Fahrenheit 9/11″ and his Oscar® winning film “Bowling for Columbine,” acclaimed filmmaker Michael Moore’s new documentary sets out to investigate the American healthcare system. Sticking to his tried-and-true one-man approach, Moore sheds light on the complicated medical affairs of individuals and local communities. SICKO promises to be every bit as indicting as Moore’s previous films.

    View Trailer:
    * Large (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Positive; Or, One Of The Best Arguments For BitTorrent. This trailer’s inclusion almost seems perfunctory.

    I don’t think that you could easily dismiss the story about Michael Moore paying the insurance costs for one of the country’s biggest outspoken Moore critics as anything less than a nice, calculated move to start the PR machine into overdrive or the recent dust-up about Moore going to Cuba to help out some workers from 9/11 get the kind of medical care that they just couldn’t here in the states but what you can get angry about with great prejudice is that not only do we have people staying at awful jobs simply for the health insurance but we have created the mindset that healthcare only goes to those who can afford to pay it. I realize we’re a capitalist country and as someone who has had to pay hundreds of dollars to my PPO, seething with every dime I have to turn over, I just think that the system of organized healthcare is a broken machine. From privatized drug companies who are lining their coffers with millions of dollars and excuses about R&D to millions of Americans who have to get a referral from a physician in order to see the kind of specialist they know they need.

    Sometimes,

    “We got an issue in America”¦”

    It’s way too easy to pick apart sound clips and snippets where Moore uses Bush against himself but George is right-on when he says that physicians are getting out of the game simply because of issues of liability. You can’t help but feel a twinge of something as George Bush starts this trailer and then have a laugh as George mentions that OB/GYN’s are no longer able to”¦”practice their love with women.”

    As you wonder what the hell he meant we launch into the short and sweet about where this movie is going to take us. We traipse into the halls and steps of companies who make their livelihood by adding a subjective element into the twisted world of insurance claims administration. It’s hard to imagine just what’s going on as we move at a breakneck pace through the trailer but, yes, the first volley Moore has in his arsenal is something we all should know: the more claims you can deny the better overall health of the corporation. Nothing is more important than the health of the corporation and that resonates loud and clear.

    What’s more is Moore is well stocked in his quick facts. Hauling out old footage of Nixon declaring that he’d like to see America have the best health-care coverage in the world only to quickly use modern footage of some members of congress with accompanying Pop-Up Video symbols about how much each one of them received from health-care lobbyists to say nothing of the bow he puts on it all: we’re far enough down on the health-care list that we’re just inches above Slovenia in terms of quality.

    Quick moment of a congressional hearing of a high-level medical insurance reviewer who says that, yes, she denied a necessary operation for a man, who subsequently died, just so she could continue to ensure her ascension within the corporation in question. It’s appalling.

    The humor strikes up at about this time. This is where Moore takes his 9/11 workers to Guantanamo Bay in order to get them the medical care that the Bush Administration is taking issue with as he decided to go to nearby Cuba. It’s part showmanship and part factual farce as nothing makes hard cold reality go down better than a little absurdity. This trailer works on all levels. If it doesn’t get your blood simmering then I can’t imagine what would.

    ONCE (2007)

    Director: John Carney
    Cast: Glen Hansard, Marketa Irglova
    Release: Now Playing
    Synopsis: A modern day musical set on the streets of Dublin. Featuring Glen Hansard and his Irish band “The Frames,” the film tells the story of a street musician and a Czech immigrant during an eventful week as they write, rehearse and record songs that reveal their unique love story.

    View Trailer:
    * Large (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Positive. This represents one of the most pertinent reasons why there is such an interest in Before Vs. After.

    When I initially saw this trailer I was bemused in a way, seeing all the superlatives heaped upon the film by those who have seen it during the festivals in which it has played, but there just had to be something, right, in all the people who are quoted in this piece saying something to the effect of its sheer genius?

    I, you, cannot be sure because we’re only presented with the trailer but see how we’re led down a unique path during this trailer’s exposition. Initially we’re offered the very simplistic stylings of Glen Hansard as a busker on the streets of Dublin. (One of *the* best places to get plastered if ever there was one such a place that could earn such a distinction) The tone is implicitly melodic as we’re shown not only the Sundance award it won but our first quote from mainstream media, here played by Kenneth Turan of the LA Times, that heralds this movie as the second coming of Christ.

    The trailer is allowed to take over and in a matter of seconds, sheer seconds, we’re let into the tiny world between a man and a woman. The one, as we’ve seen, is a street performer and the other uses the streets in order to make a living. It’s bright as day, clear as crystal, to everyone watching this trailer that these two definitely have something. Whether it’s chemistry or something else entirely as you see them interact with one another you can’t help but feel that this trailer establishes a good amount of personality in a tightly packed amount of time.

    In the musical interlude, with one of the best original songs I’ve ever heard placed within an advertisement, the happy-happy joy-joy moments these two kids share just feels real, if nothing else. The way we see them touch one another and get close to one another just feels natural and doesn’t ever stray into forced intimacy.

    This is where the drama comes in.

    The young girl not only has a husband but the guy is coming to Ireland to check up on his old lady. This is where, even in the brief moment we’ve been exposed to these two individuals, there’s tension and a quick quote from the New York Times, the Chicago Tribune and Rolling Stone just blowing their collective wad over this film. It’s enough to make you think, “Shit, I need to see this film.” The music isn’t bad, the people seem nice as fuck and the location seems awfully nice to look at.

    This is where the feeling to drop everything just takes over and the need to see the film overrides any objection to how far you need to travel to see it. For any trailer to be able and do that not only deserves my money but deserves other people’s as well.

    After seeing the movie and seeing how it is deserving of a superlative of some sort, be that of best musical, best love story you’ll get dragged to yet be pleasantly surprised at from the first frame, there is no question that this movie will stay with you long after you’ve seen it. It’s the best thing, after SUPERBAD, that I’ve seen this summer.

    BRATZ (2007)


    Director: Possibly A Guantanamo Detainee
    Cast:
    Who Cares
    Release: Unfortunately, It Will Be
    Synopsis:
    I pity you if you actually care.

    View Trailer:
    * Large (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Negative. Enjoy, this is the worst trailer I’ve never had to review.

  • Trailer Park: Comic-Con 2007 Update

    By Christopher Stipp

    Archives? Right Here…
    Want an exclusive piece of information? Seth Rogan stated tonight that his version of THE GREEN HORNET will NOT be played for comedic relief; it will be written as a straight, legitimate action movie. Take it for what it is.

    OK, it’s Friday night, Saturday morning, 12:24 in the morning to be exact, and I have just come from the STAR WARS/WETA party to write a post.

    What, with my screening of SUPERBAD just hours ago to said party where I consumed exactly two appletinis and two-thirds of a Heineken before tarrying away to Wendy’s so that I could eat great even late before midnight, I just had to let you know that I have seen the coverage from the other sites out there and, believe you me, there is no comparison.

    Sure, you could follow the panels that have been written about, the information that’s been interpreted by other writers, but I figured something out this year with the help of esteemed EIC, Ken Plume: Video.

    I bought a $15 tripod and hooked it up to my camcorder and took off into the throngs of my 1:1’s today and the ones I’ll be covering tomorrow. I should mention that if you’re interested in what major celebrities are saying to other sites who have been privileged enough to secure their holiest of holies, please go elsewhere. You can learn a lot from what a lot of writers are saying about the panels. For example, I can tell you, categorically, that the Warner Bros. panel sucked. It sucked for reasons that I can’t even explain at this point. I would use other, more descriptive language, to describe the sucktitude of the panel but I won’t.

    I have audio.

    It’s something I figured out after four years of attending this Comic-Con. You’ve got to get the stories no one else will bring and since most every single major studio deemed it good enough to shaft and tank every exclusive request for an interview I thought it would be fun to try and scoop the scoopers. Why bother having some writer’s interpretation of the panel’s events distilled when you can have the straight poop.

    I have Zack Snyder’s audio of THE WATCHMEN panel; it’s just something no one else is going to bring you.

    I’ve got Kevin’s latest Q&A.

    I have a 1:1 video interview with Ben Garant and Thomas Lennon talking about BALLS OF FURY, where it ends up being hijacked by David Lo Pan himself, James Hong.

    I’ve got the SUPERBAD Q&A which was done after an exclusive screening and where yours truly even made a jackass out of himself by asking a question about the Michael Cera “incident” which I never bothered to check up on after the fact to find out that the “leaked” video was just a hoax (yeah, that was a real journalistic shining moment).

    I’ve got the lovely Missy Peregrym talking about her turn in HEROES and what her new series, THE REAPER, means to her career as an actress who’s simply trying to do whatever she can to stay out of the unemployment line. (She’s sensitive about these things…) She’s, perhaps, been the shining star of the Con so far.

    I’ve even got Blair Butler of G4 taking some minutes to talk to me about comic books, nerd-ism and the magic of the con.

    But, for now, you’ve all got to wait it out until I process all this raw footage. I’m not in the mood to do anything with it, I still have tomorrow to go. So far I’m looking at 1:1’s with the actors of MONSTER SQUAD, the director for SAW and a socio/political cartoonist who should be credited with being a voice for those of us who see our country devolving in ways that we can’t control on our own, Ted Rall.

    Comic-Con is quite exciting this year. I don’t care what the haters will have you believe, the Con is just as alive and well as it should be, regardless of the slack treatment I’m getting by those in charge of the talent.

    Wish you were here.