FRED Entertainment

February 5, 2014

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Andy Bobrow 4

Filed under: A Bit Of A Chat With Ken Plume,Interviews — Tags: , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 11:33 pm

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have another chat with COMMUNITY writer/producer Andy Bobrow, about cannisters, pilots, pop tarts, and regret.

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Andy Bobrow 4“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-andy_bobrow_4.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

February 3, 2014

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Chris McKenna 2

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have another chat with writer and COMMUNITY executive producer Chris McKenna, about returns, farewells, Harmonizing, Banks, John Oliver, and broken promises.

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Chris McKenna 2“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-chris_mckenna_2.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

December 20, 2013

An Evening With John Hodgman & Ken Plume VII

Filed under: A Bit Of A Chat With Ken Plume,Interviews — Tags: , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 8:34 pm

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have another of my periodic chats with deranged millionaire, minor television celebrity, PC, and literary trivialist John Hodgman, about theater, sap runs, The Rule of 86, the lonely lodger, and secret societies.

Hope you enjoy…

Download “An Evening With John Hodgman & Ken Plume VII“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-john_hodgman_7.mp3]

(PREVIOUSLY: An Evening With John Hodgman & Ken Plume I, An Evening With John Hodgman & Ken Plume II, An Evening With John Hodgman & Ken Plume III, An Evening With John Hodgman & Ken Plume IV, An Evening With John Hodgman & Ken Plume V), & An Evening With John Hodgman & Ken Plume VI)

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

December 9, 2013

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & David Mitchell & Lindsey Fitzharris & Ravenmaster Chis Skaife

Filed under: A Bit Of A Chat With Ken Plume,Interviews — UncaScroogeMcD @ 7:25 pm

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have a chat with writer/performer David Mitchell, medical historian Lindsey Fitzharris, and Tower of London Ravenmaster Chris Skaife about pies, tea, Towers, ravens, executions, Hitler’s toilet, and the myth of history. Recorded live at the Hung, Drawn, and Quartered pub in London, England.

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & David Mitchell & Lindsey Fitzharris & Ravenmaster Chis Skaife“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-david_mitchell-lindsey_fitzharris-chris_skaife.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

towertroupe.png

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Robert Popper 3

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have another chat with the creator of FRIDAY NIGHT DINNER and the man behind Timewaster Robin Cooper, Robert Popper, about chicken in a basket, Emo Phillips, notes, whispering, and Robin Cooper Walking Tours. Recorded live at Bill’s pub in London, England.

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Robert Popper 3“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-robert_popper_3.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & The Dawson Bros. 3

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have another chat with the UK writing trio The Dawson Bros.Andrew Dawson, Steve Dawson, & Tim Inman – about caring less, pub food, Tolkien, and the Oxford shark. Recorded live at The Eagle and Child Pub in Oxford, England.

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & The Dawson Bros. 3“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-dawson_bros_3.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

October 18, 2013

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Brian Jay Jones

Filed under: Interviews — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 4:20 pm

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have a chat with biographer Brian Jay Jones about Jim Henson, Muppets, choreography of the unseen, Washington Irving, and Daily Show mugs.

Be sure to pick up his wonderful new biography of Jim Henson titles, appropriately, JIM HENSON: THE BIOGRAPHY.

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Brian Jay Jones“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-brian_jay_jones.mp3]

——

brianjoneshen.png

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

September 20, 2013

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & James Urbaniak 3

Filed under: A Bit Of A Chat With Ken Plume,Interviews — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 9:33 am

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have another chat with master thespian and interweb bon vivant James Urbaniak, about temping, Woody Allen, Robert Altman, Spanish Fly, and The Venture Bros. Recorded live at DragonCon 2013.

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & James Urbaniak 3“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-james_urbaniak_3.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

August 21, 2013

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Hal Lublin 2

Filed under: A Bit Of A Chat With Ken Plume,Interviews — Tags: , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:57 am

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, Ken Plume has another chat with actor Hal Lublin, about beguitared, Rockapella, Sketch-a-Sketch, Kid Cackowski, operators, and Lubbers.

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Hal Lublin 2“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-hal_lublin_2.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

August 13, 2013

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & William Shatner

Filed under: A Bit Of A Chat With Ken Plume,Interviews — Tags: , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 2:33 pm

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have a chat with the legendary William Shatner about Captains, candor, raw nerves, and wine.

His latest documentary project, THE CAPTAINS CLOSE UP – featuring in-depth, expanded conversations with fellow Star Trek captains Patrick Stewart, Kate Mulgrew, Avery Brooks, Scott Bakula, and Chris Pine – is now available.

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & William Shatner“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-william_shatner.mp3]

shatnercap.png

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

August 12, 2013

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Austin Ivansmith

Filed under: A Bit Of A Chat With Ken Plume,Interviews — Tags: , , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 7:09 pm

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have a chat with videogame director Austin Ivansmith about DuckTales, Dr. Bitter ‘n’ Resentful, eloquence, esotericolacity, greasy spoon games, smugendipity, and the Paul F. Tompquest.

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Austin Ivansmith“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-austin_ivansmith.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

August 11, 2013

FROM THE VAULT: J. Michael Straczynski Interview

Filed under: Interviews — Tags: , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 9:14 pm

vaultinterviews.png

Conducted ~8/2000

jmsLess than a year after the Babylon 5 spin-off Crusade ended its too-short run on TNT, I had a chance to have a nice long talk with creator J. Michael Straczynski about his long career in television, his uphill battle to get Babylon 5 made, and the bitter end of its follow-up.

I decided to bring this interview out from the vault – As well as interviews with other Babylon 5 cast members – in celebration of the release of Babylon 5 At Twenty: A Visual Celebration – a massive tome that takes readers behind-the-scenes of the show, and can be ordered via B5Books.com.

———–

blankguide.gif

lucyline.gif

KEN PLUME: What area of the country are you from?

J. MICHAEL STRACZYNKSKI: I was born in Patterson, New Jersey, and raised pretty much all around the country. My family tended to move from place to place following economic prospects and jobs and looking for new opportunities, so we changed schools, colleges, grade schools, high schools every 6 months to a year – depending on the breaks. I grew up in Jersey, California, Illinois, Texas… That sort of thing.

PLUME: It must have been difficult…

STRACZYNKSKI: It was difficult. As I went from place to place, I would arrive and there was no point really to making friends, because you knew – in 6 months to 1 year and sometimes less – you would be gone and they would be gone, which tended to lead me toward an isolationist style. The only thing that I discovered very early on is that, even though we might change schools and cities and towns and states, the books in the library were the same. They had the same covers. They had the same characters. I could go and visit those people in the library as if I knew them. Hence, even as a very young kid, I began spending a lot of time in the school library. By the time I was about 11 years-old, I’d already worked my way through the kids section and had moved into the adult section – which is where I really began to discover science-fiction for the first time.

PLUME: Which genre was your favorite at that time?

STRACZYNKSKI: It was probably space science-fiction. The Lensman books by E. E. (Doc) Smith. The Lord of the Rings – being more of a fantasy thing, but I discovered that as well. A lot of Arthur Clarke, a lot of Ray Bradbury. The first Bradbury books I read were R Is For Rocket and S Is For Space. A lot of the futuristic space stuff seemed to me to be a very cool form of science-fiction, so that was my first real baptism in the genre.

PLUME: Were you writing at that time as well?

STRACZYNKSKI: I always knew that I was going to be a writer. There was no question in my mind about that. I can’t recall a time when I didn’t know that, so I knew I had to prepare myself. I read voraciously. I learned about all the different kinds of pens and grades of paper. When I got to high school, I took four semesters of typing, because I knew that if I was going to be a writer, I should learn how to type. I was one of the fastest typists to come out of Chula Vista High School. It was in my senior year that I had prepared myself enough so that something kind-of rolled over in my head and said, “Now.” That’s when I wrote my first short story, three poems, and some other material. That day, I wrote 10 pages, and the next day I wrote 10 pages… and I’ve been writing 10 pages ever since – to my current age of 46.

PLUME: What aspects of the writing process appealed most to you? Was it the ability to create your own worlds? Was it as a companion? What was it that entranced you?

STRACZYNKSKI: It was the story-telling aspect more than anything else. I loved watching stories and I loved hearing stories and I loved telling stories. It was creating new places and people and telling those stories… It’s a holistic kind of a thing. I’ve always enjoyed the writing process. There are times when it’s frustrating – when you’re staring at the monitor and, for some reason, the characters are playing coy. But 98% of the time, it’s terrific and a lot of fun.

PLUME: When you first began writing those 10 pages a day, was it initially merely for yourself, or were you writing with the intention that other people would see it?

STRACZYNKSKI: Initially – in my own mind -it was to learn the process… To learn how to do it. It was something that was really my own, for the first time. The odd thing is that – almost immediately – whatever I began to write, I began to sell. I would send out little articles to kid’s magazines and they would get picked up. I wrote a couple of short stories, and they appeared in the high school periodical. I began writing sketches, and when one of my teachers happened to see what I was writing and asked to look at it, and the next thing I know, they had formed a troupe of actors out of the high school class to go from class to class acting out these one-act plays. Then the high school came to me and said, “We’re going to institute a new deal where a student will write an assembly-length play. Do you want to write it? Of course, if it doesn’t work, we’ll never do it again.” No pressure. I said sure, so I wrote this full-length show. This was within 3-4 months of having started writing. Literally the next year, I was commissioned to write an actual stage play for Summer stock for a local theater. Just coming right out of the box, I began to sell – which was very much to my own astonishment. One play that I wrote I sent off to a local theater, and they called back wanted to arrange for me to meet them. My mom got the message, and I showed up, and they were looking for my dad. I said, “No, I wrote this.” They wouldn’t believe it. I had to quote parts of it back at them before they’d believe me. So even though I started off primarily just writing for myself to learn the process, I began selling almost immediately and have ever since. I’ve sold about maybe 85-90% of everything I’ve ever written. I have no explanation.

PLUME: So were your high school years more stable as far as moving than your elementary and junior high years?

STRACZYNKSKI: No. I attended four different high schools: St. Benedict’s High School in Matawan, New Jersey, Matawan Public School, Lennox High School in Lennox, California, and Chula Vista High School in Chula Vista, California. I went to four different colleges: Kankakee Community College in Illinois, Richland College in Dallas, Texas, Southwestern College in Chula Vista, and San Diego State University.

PLUME: Did you find yourself having to reestablish your writing presence in each of the institutions as you moved?

STRACZYNKSKI: Yeah, but – again – it was never that much of a problem. I would go to the campus newspaper or the local papers and say, “I’m a writer and I can do this, that, and the other thing…” It was never much of a problem. I was very lucky in that respect. When I got to San Diego State University, I sort of took over the campus paper. I was writing entertainment reviews, columns, news articles, investigative features, I had three different columns of my own… Instead of The Daily Aztec, they began calling it The Daily Joe, because every day I had something in there. It was then that I began to get kind-of persnickety about it because at the time – being an idiot and not knowing any better – I refused to take any kind of a salary for what I was doing for the paper. I said, “If I do it my way as a freelancer, I’m not committed to following anybody’s orders. I can do what I want and walk away.” So even though I could have made a lot of money writing for the paper, I never did. I thought I would be more pure that way. I was, of course, an idiot.

PLUME: Especially at that level.

STRACZYNKSKI: As a struggling college student, no less, where I could have used the money. Very early on, I approached writing from a very naïve, idealistic point of view. I’ve gotten rid of some of it, but unfortunately a lot of it still lingers.

PLUME: What’s the hardest part to divorce yourself of, in terms of that idealistic, persnickety attitude?

STRACZYNKSKI: The hardest part is standing up for what I want to say and not compromising on certain principles. For instance, while I was in college, I began to write also for the Los Angeles Times, San Diego bureau. I became one of their key entertainment writers. One story I did about a group in San Diego called The Lambs Players, I found out that this religious theater group was getting state funding – which, of course, you’re not supposed to do, and I included that in my article. The editor said, “This has to come out, because this is news and you’re writing an entertainment feature.” I said, “But that’s integral to the entire story. This is something that has to be included in the article.” He said, “Well, then it has to come from a news reporter. You can’t do it.” I refused to take it out, and he refused to run it with it, and that standoff basically ended my time with the LA Times. I wouldn’t buckle on principle.

Continued below…

/

August 5, 2013

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Chris Hardwick

Filed under: A Bit Of A Chat With Ken Plume,Interviews — Tags: , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 4:27 pm

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have a chat with quantum enthusiast Chris Hardwick about Moose, Fraggles, meth, bowling, Phirman, and gauntlets.

For more Chris Hardwickery, go to Nerdist.com.

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Chris Hardwick“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-chris_hardwick.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

July 28, 2013

FROM THE VAULT: Bryan Cranston Interview

Filed under: Interviews — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 3:11 pm

vaultinterviews.png

Conducted ~6/2003

cranstonLong before he became Walter White on AMC’s Breaking Bad, Bryan Cranston was stealing scenes on Malcolm In The Middle after a long career as a jobbing actor.

It was during the tail end of his Malcolm run that we had our in-depth chat. Here’s the original intro to the piece…

————————-

While most people will recognize Bryan Cranston as the affably befuddled father Hal on Malcolm In The Middle, more discerning viewers will remember his roles in From the Earth to the Moon, Saving Private Ryan, Babylon 5, and numerous others on TV and film.

He’s also a writer/director/producer, having performed all three duties (plus acting) on his independent feature Last Chance, and directed an episode of Malcolm during this past season. He’s slated to directed three more episodes this coming season (including the season premiere).

Last Chance has just been picked up by Showtime and will be making its premiere this Fall, with a DVD release planned as well.

In addition, he’s also produced and distributed an instructional DVD for parents and their children on how to stay safe from abduction, called Kid Smartz.

You can learn about Kid Smartz, Last Chance, Malcolm and more at Bryan’s official website, www.BryanCranston.com

lucyline.gif

KEN PLUME: You’re from California, originally?

BRYAN CRANSTON: I am. I was born and raised out here. Born in Hollywood, believe it or not, and raised primarily in the San Fernando Valley, where I still live.

PLUME: So this would be what, the ‘mid-50’s, and the ’60s were your formative years?

CRANSTON: Yeah, well, ’60s and ’70s.

PLUME: What was your childhood like?

CRANSTON: It was great. My dad was a struggling actor, and my mom met my dad in acting class, with the likes of Mike Connors and Anne Bancroft – people like that, who were all young, struggling actors. Back then it was the late ’40s, I suppose, right around 1950. They met, they fell in love, they got married, and she quit so that she could raise babies. That was a pretty much expected thing back then. I do happen to know that she regrets that decision, feeling that she could have done both, and has longed to return. She’s now, God bless her, in the motion picture home, where she lives, and doing well. I recently wrote a little part for her in the next movie I plan to make, and she has one word in it. This was all by design – she would be offended by this, but her one word in it is, “Asshole.” So I’m going to get my mother to say, “Asshole.”

PLUME: Are you working out any issues?

CRANSTON: Yeah, I probably am. Like so many people, we don’t really know what issues we’re working on. It just made me laugh when I realized I could do this and not sacrifice anything. So I thought, “Okay.” I love to act, and I’ve been blessed with opportunity, so I’m just following it through. It’s like riding a wave. You go out and try to catch a wave, and you miss most of them. Once in a while, you catch one – and even when you catch it, you go, “Hey, this is a nice wave”… you still don’t know how long it’s going to take you. It could take you all the way into shore, which it looks like Malcolm is going to do. Then at the end of it, it takes you up, show ends… I’ll maybe sit on the beach for a little bit.

PLUME: Or you could be caught in the riptide and never be seen again…

CRANSTON: There you go – you could do a face plant. Exactly. I’ve been involved in those, where you think something is going to turn out good and it turns out just terrible, and all kinds of things. So it’s as fickle as anything I’ve ever been involved with. But somehow, someway, I think those who survive this business are able to find a sense of security built in this insecure world that we live in here. I’ve been doing this for 23 years, and for about 20 years exclusively as an actor. I haven’t done anything else. I find that remarkably rewarding, that that’s my chosen profession and I’m able to do it.

PLUME: Do you think it’s just a function of coming to the realization that it is a fickle business?

CRANSTON: There are certain factors that have helped me survive, as an actor. Because you ask any actor and they’ll be able to tell you, “My God, there was this guy in class that I worked with, I never saw him do anything professionally, but he blew me away whenever he worked.” There are people in class that are fantastic, there are people who start working that are unbelievably gifted, but don’t go the mile. The career is a marathon, it’s not a sprint, and you have to have that kind of mentality, that if your first couple miles, they’re not working out to good – just hang in there. Just keep going, if that’s what you indeed love to do. So my advice to young actors is only become an actor, professionally, if you have to. There’s probably a half a dozen people who will read that comment and go, “I know what he’s talking about. I feel that. I need to do this, I have no choice. But, to be an actor, because I’m pushed into that – it’s part of me.” Then, there will be the masses who go, “What the hell does that mean? Only become an actor if you have to? What is that? What an idiot.” And throw it away because they don’t get it. They see the external things surrounding an actor’s life, and the only actors that they see are ones that they admire or wish they could have a similar career to.

PLUME: Which are the working ones…

CRANSTON: Right.

PLUME: Which is what, 5% according to the Guild?

CRANSTON: If that much. I think it is something like under 5% make a living. Make a living – that means qualifying for your medical and dental plan – then maybe a half a percent of that make a very good living. So it’s not a business for anyone who has other desires. If you are thinking about making a killing financially, or getting in it for all the great women and this and that and the other, then you’re out of your mind. You would do much better to go to business school. Get a degree in business.

PLUME: Why hang out at clubs when you can hang out at cattle calls?

CRANSTON: There’s nothing more testing of your character than to endure one call after another, after another, after another where you see clones of yourself when you’re just starting, and you’re figuring out, “How do I get noticed?” You go through this whole painful retrospective, and the only way you can do it, the only way you can survive, is if you love acting. Then go act. Be in a play, do a student film, do something that allows you to act and find the joy in that.

PLUME: I’m assuming that your parents were not exactly encouraging of you going into acting?

CRANSTON: My dad wasn’t, because my dad was living the typical actor’s life, which was a hard struggle. I remember as a kid, back in the early ’60s, he would be in a good mood, and there were things going on and, you know, we bought a new car. And then the following year we sold that new car and got an old car. Okay, I don’t really get that, but kids are resilient. We’d have nothing to relate it to, and you don’t have a sense of underprivileged or privileged or deprived or anything. We were pretty much in a middle class society, and we’re living that life, and okay. One year we put in a pool, we had a built-in pool. Then I remember the following year my mother saying, “We can’t swim, because we can’t afford the chemicals that go in the pool.” “Oh, okay.” You have a flash of a sense that, “I guess this is what every kid goes through.” It’s only into your later teen years you realize, “Some kids don’t have that problem. Some kids kind of have it easier, have money or inherit money – Wow! What’s that like?” My whole family, like many depression era families, were raised on the ability to save a dollar – but they had no education, no background, into how to make a dollar. You got a job, get a job, hold a job – any job. Doesn’t matter, just get it. What’s a better job? A better job is one that pays more or it’s a little easier. That’s a better job.

PLUME: So it was always thinking in the now…

CRANSTON: Yeah, always thinking in the now, and save a buck, here’s a coupon, here’s an early bird special … here’s a garage sale, buy it there. Go to the Goodwill to buy some things. Do this, and so it was always a lower middle-class kind of mentality that I grew up with, and because of that, I went into an acting career concerned about, “Oh, I’ve got to save this, I’ve got to do this. Only drive this … I can get another couple years out of these clothes.” Thinking about that, “I need this job, because I’ve got to pay this bill, I’ve got to pay my rent.” It was nickel and diming my mind to the point where it would be intrusive to my art. I would start thinking and start obsessing about how I did. “How did I do at this audition? Did I do well? Do I think I’m going to get the job? Let me call my agent. Did you hear from them? Did they call you?” One agent one time said to me, “Bryan, listen. Believe me, they have my number. If they want you, they will call me.” “Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know. Did you get any feedback? Did they say they liked me? Am I closer?” I always just spent energy on this, until about 15 years ago, where I formulated a different point of view. That was, if I took all that energy on “Am I going to get a job? Who did they hire? Why did they hire? Why don’t they hire me? Oh my God, look who the competition is! He’s good. I’ve seen his work before. Oh God, I’ve really got to be good now, because …” and start psyching yourself out and this sort of thing. Instead of spending any amount of energy on that, I’d put the energy and the time on the work. Go back to the work. Your work starts when you get a phone call. You’ve got to read the script, because you’re going to be reading for the character of a barber and whatever… a college kid… whatever it is. You start putting together the ideas of your character, from that moment. You read the script to get a sense of the tone of the film or TV show, and you read your character to get a sense of tone of the character. Then, what I’ve always done is you start making a bouquet. I start, “What about an accent? Do I play with an accent? What about an affectation? This guy’s kind of full of himself. What about stance? Or something that he does…” And I start putting together little things like this, like gathering and making a bouquet. Perhaps now attitude, “Is he angry? Is he upset?” So I create this thing, “What does he look like? What does he dress like? How does he wear his hair? Where is he now?” I ask myself all these questions, and I would continue working on it until I felt that I would get the casting people or the producers in the room to go from having their heads rest in their hands, to picking up their head and noticing me. That I have to find something that’s that different, you know, that they would then be able to later on say, “What about that kid who did that weird thing.” Even if it was totally wrong, at least it’s something that makes a stand and says something.

PLUME: That broke the monotony.

CRANSTON: That breaks the monotony. You know, it had to be something that I felt no one else would do, because there are guideposts when you read a script. You go, “Okay, I know this guy. I know this guy. Okay.” Some people can then put the script down and go, “Okay, I know what to do,” and you’ll do what you expect to do. You’ll see the actors come in and do exactly what was written. I kept thinking, “I’ve got to do something more than what’s written. I have to go a step beyond that. Sometimes it would come to me right away, and sometimes it would take hours and hours and I’d still contemplate on it. But the energy was focused on the character, and building the character – as opposed to something that’s out of my control. I would then select my bouquet – throwing some flowers out and putting other flowers in, even at the last minute before you go in. I wouldn’t talk to anybody, I’d be alone and collect my thoughts and go into the room, present the bouquet to the people, leave it with them and you walk out. From that moment on, your job is done. I never thought about it. I would have a whole tray of scripts and sides that I would throw the things into. Not only would I not call the agents anymore, I wouldn’t even think of it. I would completely forget about it. I wouldn’t tell anybody about my auditions … I didn’t want to conjure up any kind of things I was up for, and “I think I’m really close to getting this.” It was just a waste of energy to me. Then, when I got callbacks – and I started getting more and more callbacks from things, because of my energy in a different place – I would have to try to recall, “Oh yeah, what was that?” And I’d go in that big box and I’d start fishing out, “Oh, there it is. Oh yeah, yeah, I remember this guy. Oh good, they want to see it again. Any notes?” “No, no, same thing.” “Okay.” Then I’d start working again, and that was my salvation. I simply took the axiom of not thinking for a moment about things that are out of my control. It’s not a part of acting, to wonder who they’re picking or why they’re picking someone is someone else’s business – it’s certainly not mine.

PLUME: A watched pot never boils…

CRANSTON: Exactly. I digress, but you asked about my father – he was an actor, and he started producing things and he did a series of commercials for the United Way, and PSA spots, and he put me in one. I had a great experience, and I knew from that experience that it was special. I was about 8 years old, 7 or 8, and I knew it was special. I didn’t quite know why it felt special, and I certainly didn’t say, “This is it!” at that age, but I knew something about that was special. I guess that sort of just stayed with me for many, many years. Then you go into high school, and I got into sports, and I was interested in girls, and everything’s kind of a mishmash of confusion and desires. Then I had a cognition around 21 or 22 that this is what I should do.

Continued below…

/

July 26, 2013

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Paul F. Tompkins 6

Filed under: A Bit Of A Chat With Ken Plume,Interviews — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 7:32 pm

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have another chat with actor, stand-up, gadfly, and sartorial dandy Paul F. Tompkins, about squeaky chairs, foreign audiences, tents, Thrilling Adventures, and ascot memorials.

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Paul F. Tompkins 6“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-paul_f_tompkins_6.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Steven Moffat

Filed under: A Bit Of A Chat With Ken Plume,Interviews — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 7:09 pm

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have a chat with DOCTOR WHO showrunner Steven Moffat about writing, expectations, anniversaries, social media, and spoilers.

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Steven Moffat“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-steven_moffat.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

July 4, 2013

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & Tony Way 4

Filed under: A Bit Of A Chat With Ken Plume,Interviews — Tags: , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 4:24 pm

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I have another chat with writer/actor Tony Way, about mustering knights, randy queens, Merchant Ivory action figures, and Sir Tony.

You can visit his official site at www.tonyway.co.uk

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & Tony Way 4“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-tony_way_4.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

June 30, 2013

FROM THE VAULT: Craig McCracken Interview

vaultinterviews.png

Conducted ~6/2002

mccrackenHis name may not be well-known, but Craig McCracken is the creator of the massively successful Cartoon Network hits The Powerpuff Girls and Foster’s Home For Imaginary Friends.

It’s been 10 years since Blossom, Bubbles, and Buttercup first began their non-stop struggle to keep the fine citizens of Townsville safe from villains various and sundry, and even Foster’s Home has just come to an end.

I originally spoke with Craig in the run up to the big screen release of Powerpuff Girls: The Movie. We chatted at a time when the writing was on the wall that Warner Bros. had no idea how to market the film, and Craig’s fears about the campaign were realized with a poor box office showing.

Here’s my interview with Craig… Hope you enjoy…

lucyline.gif

KEN PLUME: What were the difficulties in bringing the show to the big screen – especially since, I’m assuming, it wasn’t a Disney-sized animation budget…

CRAIG McCRACKEN: No, it wasn’t. Basically, it was just keeping the tone and the feel of the show. The shows are either 11 or 22 minutes and they move pretty quickly, and that’s part of the charm of them – so it was just trying to keep that in mind and keep the energy of the story moving, even though we were dealing with a longer format. It was a challenge to not make it feel like a totally different animal. It feels like this still is Powerpuff – just longer.

PLUME: How long did it take to arrive at a story that would sustain a feature?

McCRACKEN: We came up with two stories. It took us a couple of months… we came up with two different ideas – one that was purely an action show, and then on that was more of a subtle character piece. The network liked both of them , so basically what we did is created a hybrid of the two ideas – and thus we have the movie that we just finished.

PLUME: And it’s essentially a prequel…

McCRACKEN: Yes, it’s a prequel. It tells the story about how the girls were born with superpowers, but they weren’t necessarily heroes at the beginning of this movie, so the movie is about the events that happen in their life to make them decide to be heroes.

PLUME: I’m assuming Mojo Jojo was a given as the villain…

McCRACKEN: Yeah… Yeah… For me, definitely. He’s like the catch-all villain – he can be really silly if he needs to and evil if he needs to. He works on a lot of levels.

PLUME: I was reading the Animation Blast website the other day, and I found Amid’s take on the poster interesting, seeing as how the writers listed are artists and not screenwriters – as has been the recent way of doing things in the animated feature realm…

McCRACKEN: Yeah, definitely…

PLUME: How hands-off in the process has Cartoon Network been? They seem to exist in this little bubble of creativity in a raging storm of something less than that throughout Hollywood…

McCRACKEN: Yeah! We didn’t have any screenwriters. I don’t believe in scripts – if you’re going to write, then you also have to draw, if you want to work on Powerpuff. That’s what we did with the movie – all the guys who wrote it are the same guys who storyboarded it and visualized it, figured out all the shots, and basically made the movie. So it was being written and boarded at the same time – basically like they used to make animated movies.

PLUME: Before they forgot…

McCRACKEN: Before they forgot, yeah…

PLUME: How would you say that method enhances the end product?

McCRACKEN: There’s a lot you can do without words. You can say a lot with pictures. It’s a visual medium – and especially with animation, you can do a lot that you can’t do in live action. Because it’s drawings, you can kind of go anywhere and create anything you want. It really just gives you a sense of when you need to have dialogue and when you don’t, and if your pictures are telling the story, you don’t need to have all this talking. A show like Samurai Jack – that Genndy is doing – is a testament to that, where there’s hardly any dialogue in the whole show, but you can totally follow it because the visuals are selling that. I think a lot of times, in my experience, scriptwriters fall in love with their words and feel that they need to describe everything. There’s a lot to be said for a visual way of telling stories.

PLUME: How would you describe the atmosphere at Cartoon Network? Why are these kinds of projects allowed to flourish there and not at, say, Nickelodeon?

McCRACKEN: Well, for one thing, the executives in charge at Cartoon Network are cartoon fans. I mean, these are people who grew up loving animation and loving cartoons, and the only difference between them and me is they don’t know how to draw. They’re just kind-of frustrated artists who wish they could draw cartoons, but they don’t – so they go to a network where they can say “yes or no” to good ones getting made. They trust us as creators and give us a lot of freedom to do what we do, and they basically say, “Look… We don’t know how to make cartoons. You definitely do, so you go ahead and do that and we’ll put them on the air”. They love animation.

PLUME: Is there a definite sense amongst you all of operating in a bubble?

McCRACKEN: Yeah, pretty much so. We’ve been working this way for a number of years, so we’re pretty happy with the system we’ve got here and the way things work. I’ve even had my agent saying, “Well let’s try to shop you around and do this…” And I’m like, “Well, I’ve got freedom here. I can make the cartoons that I want to – why would I want to go somewhere else? Where every decision has to be made by committee?” That doesn’t appeal to me.

PLUME: Was there any hint of that committee approach while you were working on the movie?

McCRACKEN: Not at the beginning. Near the end, as we were finishing it up, there was a little more involvement – just because this is such a big investment from the network’s point of view, that they were like, “We want to make sure that everybody’s on board with this movie and there’s nothing in it that could be problematic.” There were a few edits that had to be made from Warner Bros standpoint, but nothing so disastrous that it affected the final film.

PLUME: Content editing?

McCRACKEN: Not so much content – moreso pacing. The movie is really fast and it moves along really quickly, and I think there were just some parts where Warners wanted to keep it going a little. They felt like it maybe got a little slow in certain parts. There were a few content things, but nothing major.

PLUME: So where’s the advertising for the movie?

McCRACKEN: Good question!

PLUME: Every time I turn around, there’s another Hey Arnold! ad, but no Powerpuff

McCRACKEN: You know, I’ve been wondering the same thing myself. I don’t see any posters, I don’t see any billboards, the only commercials I’ve seen are the one’s Cartoon Network’s been airing. In theory, Warner Bros is putting $20 million into promoting this movie. The movie comes out in 15 days – hopefully I’ll start seeing it.

PLUME: I was speaking with someone earlier about the film, and they said, “When is that coming out?”…

McCRACKEN: Yeah, exactly. I’m hoping that word-of-mouth on the film – people seeing it and liking it – that that will drive more people to the theaters, because I haven’t seen the billboards or the posters or anything.

PLUME: Do you worry about it opening opposite Men In Black II?

McCRACKEN: A little bit, yeah… I mean, there’s been lots of billboards and posters and ads for that movie for a number of months! I think everybody knows that’s coming out. It’s somewhat of a different audience, though, then the Men In Black audience.

PLUME: Do you have any fears – quite valid, with Warners’ history – of this being another Iron Giant?

McCRACKEN: I hope not… I hope not… That was some of my initial fears when we originally got involved with Warners, was that they haven’t had a lot of success with their animated films. Hopefully they’ll see the potential with this one. The one thing we have going for us is that we’re already a proven property, and so hopefully that will help us at the box office – that people know what Powerpuff Girls is, whereas Iron Giant was a new thing.

PLUME: Of course, here’s hoping that there’s some advertising to remind people when it comes out…

McCRACKEN: Yes! I would… I’m waiting for it… Maybe July 2 we’ll start seeing everything… The day before it comes out…

PLUME: Hopefully it’s not July 10…

McCRACKEN: Exactly! Post-promotion…

PLUME: “By the way, did you know this movie opened last week?”…

McCRACKEN: Exactly!

Continued below…

FROM THE VAULT: Rowan Atkinson Interview

Filed under: Interviews — Tags: , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 2:54 am

vaultinterviews.png

Conducted ~7/2003

atkinsonWhat comedy fan doesn’t know the name Rowan Atkinson?

Whether it’s the snide Blackadder or the simple Mr. Bean, Atkinson has earned his comic stripes.

I got a chance to speak with Atkinson when he was promoting the spy spoof Johnny English – a film about a completely inept British agent called into action after an explosion kills all of MI5’s competent agents, leaving English to save the country.

I’d long been under the impression that Atkinson did not like doing interviews, and could be a bit of a prickly pear (in fact, I was warned of such by the publicist for the film, prior to the interview). When I’ve gone into an interview with those preconceptions, they’ve usually been quickly dismissed as soon as we get to chatting – and Rowan was no exception.

However, I did feel a bit of pressure throughout, as I got the sense that he didn’t suffer fools or puff pieces. Since I hoped I wasn’t the former and definitely wasn’t interested in the latter, I think things went well. You be the judge…

lucyline.gif

KEN PLUME: What aspects of the Johnny English character appealed to you enough to make a feature film? Because originally it was a character in a series of commercials, right?

ROWAN ATKINSON: Yeah, we made it for these commercials for a credit card in Britain. We did the campaign for about 5 years, and we must have made 13 or 14 commercials. They’re only one minute commercials, but they all had a filmic quality to them, even though they were just commercials and had a slightly ridiculous character in it – who at the time was called Richard Latham, and we rechristened him Johnny English for the sake of the movie, because it’s a name people are more likely to remember. And I did like the character, and I liked the feel of the commercials – they felt like, as I say, mini-movies. So it felt like quite a logical progression to think of maybe the character – and above all, the relationship with his sidekick, called Bough – his relationship with other people is always very interesting. In the end, what he needs by his side is the voice of reason to provide a sort of comic contrast to his flights of fantasy, which he indulges in so much… The biggest flight of fantasy being that he’s really good at his job – and that’s the role that Ben Miller playing Bough in the movie and Natalie Imbruglia playing Lorna in the movie fulfill, really. They are the voice of reason.

PLUME: Similar to the dynamic that existed within Blackadder?

ATKINSON: Yeah, except that, I suppose, as Blackadder I was the voice of reason and Baldrick was the guy with the flights of fantasy – but yes… I like partnerships. I mean, Mr. Bean was conspicuously not a partnership – although, yet again, it’s valuable to have straight men or the authority figures that Mr. Bean interacted with in a very funny way, because he’s sort of such a natural anarchist. But at the same time, Mr. Bean is a very, very self-contained character because he’s so sort-of introspective and so selfish and self-centered that there’s no particular need to have another person in the scene to make him funny – whereas something we discovered quite early on is that Johnny English really is only funny when he’s got an audience of some kind. Or when he’s got somebody to interact with… either a group of people in a room in front of whom he can make himself look ridiculous with great ease or a partner – someone to sort of…

PLUME: Bounce off of?

ATKINSON: Bounce off, exactly.

PLUME: What were the difficulties in expanding the character out in order to fill a film?

ATKINSON: Well, yeah, this is always the difficulty. It’s the difficulty we had with Mr. Bean, actually, when it went from TV to film. You certainly discover that you need to explain more about a character. In TV, and in particular in commercials, you don’t really need to explain very much at all – you just say he’s a spy and he’s a little bit theatrical and overblown and smug and he’s not very good at his job. And you don’t sort of ask any questions about that sort of thing in a commercial – but as soon as you get to a movie, and you’ve been with the character for 30 or 40 minutes, then you start asking questions like, “Why is he allowed to have this job? How has he managed to hold this job down for so long?” And that’s why at the beginning of the movie, for example, we tell the story of the fact that he is no good and everyone knows that he’s probably not very good, but he’s given the job because suddenly there’s nobody else. So he’s thrown into it, and that kind of explains why he’s there and why he’s got it. Of course then the movie actually goes on to justify why he could return. He could return in another adventure because – against all the odds – he succeeds, and that’s rather a fun aspect of the character in that even though he’s a bit of a fool and self-deluding and all those other things, he’s weirdly committed… weirdly brave, I think. He’s brave and committed and good-hearted, and he genuinely wants to save Queen and Country – it’s just that he’s got this very overblown view of himself. And that’s what provides the comedy.

PLUME: When you talk about expanding the character for the purposes of film, what were the lessons you learned in that regard from the Bean movie?

ATKINSON: Just that you have to explore more facets of the character. You can’t just have a single attitude. The great thing about sitcoms, for example, is that you can get away with a character with, really, one attitude – like Blackadder is just a relentlessly cynical man. And that’s the joke. And he’s cynical and negative in a very witty way. We would have the same problem if we tried to make a Blackadder movie – I think if you just had a relentlessly cynical man who never acknowledged the ramifications of his own actions, etc. etc., then I think it would be a very odd movie. That’s what we had to do with Mr. Bean – we had to get this very, very selfish and kind of autonomous character to acknowledge that maybe he’d done something wrong 2/3 of the way through the movie, and then the last 1/3 is him trying to put things right again. So we had to give him feelings – which actually wasn’t very easy, in which I slightly regret it in many ways, in terms of the character’s history. Because I like the fact that he’s a natural born anarchist who doesn’t give a damn about anybody else – and I quite like that aspect of Mr. Bean, but we had to kind of dilute it, or explore the possibilities. And similarly, with Johnny English, he couldn’t just carry on walking through scenes where he thought “this” and it turned out “that”. We had to have him reach the point when he was fired – which he is – from the job, and then he becomes somebody slightly different. Suddenly he’s a kind of man-on-the-run, and the establishment that he’d worked for and fought for for so long suddenly abandoned him and declared that he was no good and regretted ever putting him on the case. And that’s quite a nice character thing, when you can see him pick himself up, brush himself off, and start again – and then eventually he succeeds and everyone loves him by the end. So it’s a pretty tried and tested formula, but it was a very important thing to do with the character.

PLUME: Would you say that it was easier to adapt Johnny English than it was to bring Bean to the big screen?

ATKINSON: Hmm… That’s a good question… I don’t know. About the same. I think maybe Bean was a bit more difficult, actually. I think, in many ways, we had to compromise the character more.

PLUME: Do you think those compromises affected the audience reaction to the film? It seems a lot of people were split on either loving or hating the Bean film…

ATKINSON: Yeah, I know what you mean. I absolutely know what you mean. I don’t know, is the answer. I probably haven’t done enough listening or enough research into what people thought, but I think undoubtedly there is an aspect to Mr. Bean which is rather fun in short doses. It’s fun just to see him selfishly pursuing his own agenda – which he does so readily. I think the movie, because it had to have a story and involve other people – when we decided, rightly or wrongly, that we wanted him to acknowledge the consequences of his actions, it meant that you did end up with a compromised version of the character. So I would agree. Whereas with Johnny English, I don’t think we’ve compromised the character at all, actually. I think we’ve just given him a firmer grounding in reality.

PLUME: In recent interviews, you’ve mentioned the desire to revisit a film version of Bean…

ATKINSON: Yeah…

PLUME: How different would that be from how you handled the first film?

ATKINSON: Hmmmm… These are extremely good questions that you’re asking me, if only because I was thinking about this this morning, because I’m kind of in a quandary – because Johnny English, thankfully, internationally… and whatever it does here, we don’t know… but internationally it has been very successful, so they’re already talking about, “When are you going to sit down and write a sequel?” Which is flattering and sweet and we might well do it. But, of course, I’ve always had this hankering to do more Mr. Beans someday. I didn’t want to do it straightaway, which is why we went off on the tangent of Johnny English – but if we sat down again, I don’t know. You see, whether I should just do half-hour TV episodes, or whether you could make a movie that was more episodic – more self-consciously episodic, that was a kind of “sketch movie”… more like an Austin Powers movie, where the story is not particularly important, nor is the interaction of the character with the story that important – you just enjoy the jokes for what they are.

PLUME: So it’s a matter of acknowledging that it’s a character with a clearly defined character that’s not going to vary much?

ATKINSON: Yes, exactly. I think it’s sometimes better if he doesn’t vary very much… or whether you give it a different kind of conceit… Mr. Bean sits down to write his autobiography, and he remembers all the marvelous moments in his life.

PLUME: Which would allow the character to remain true to its episodic strengths…

ATKINSON: I think the character does tend to suit an episodic thing, because what’s fun about him is that he doesn’t care about anyone else, and it’s very difficult for a main character – a lead character – in a movie to not care about anybody else.

Continued below…

FROM THE VAULT: Carl Reiner Interview

Filed under: Interviews — Tags: , , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 2:48 am

vaultinterviews.png

Conducted ~10/2004

reinerBe it his work with Sid Caesar on Your Show of Shows, the creation of The Dick Van Dyke Show, numerous “2,000 Year Old Man” pairings with Mel Brooks, Steve Martin’s classic comedies, or any number of accomplishments too long to list, Carl Reiner is a true comedy legend.

He’s penned quite a few books (his Enter Laughing is a must-read), plays, and films. He’s like a Renaissance man sans the puffy shirt. He even made a return to films as a key member of the gang in the Ocean’s 11 franchise.

I leapt at the chance to chat with Carl, even if it was originally intended to be a fluff piece on the short-lived Dreamworks CG show Father Of The Pride. Would you pass up an opportunity like that just because the show it was attached to was an unwatchable mess (through no fault of Carl’s, it must be said, as he just provided a voice).

It was a truly memorable experience talking to Carl – particularly memorable was the technical gaffe that erased the last 10 minutes of our conversation. I would have been disappointed if I had walked away from it without at least one embarrassing anecdote.

lucyline.gif

KEN PLUME: It’s a pleasure to be speaking with you…

CARL REINER: Yes, how are you!

PLUME: I’m doing well – hope you’re doing well…

REINER: Yes, but just give me your name again…

PLUME: Ken Plume…

REINER: Ken! That’s all I need… I’m not gonna call you Mister….

PLUME: Should I call you “sir” ?

REINER: Yes, please… Absolutely…

PLUME: Well, it’s a pleasure to be speaking with you, sir…

REINER: Thank you… You’ll have to amend that after we finish – you’ll say, “I was mistaken at the beginning,” or “It’s just what I figured.”

PLUME: Even if I was mistaken, I would never admit it…

REINER: Never! You’re an honest man… An honest man! A man who wants to be honest, anyway…

PLUME: I try… I often fail, but I try… You’re one of two people that I’ve wanted to interview for years…

REINER: That’s what you say every time you open a conversation…

PLUME: No, honestly! I’m being truthful now…

REINER: Oh, okay…

PLUME: You and Mel Brooks…

REINER: Oh, well, I agree with that. I would rather speak to Mel Brooks than anybody I know. I’m not kidding! I mean, we speak on the phone once in awhile… A couple of days ago, he was going to London… and I never come away from the phone after speaking with him that I’m not laughing.

PLUME: I’ve tried for years to get interviews with both of you, to little success…

REINER: Well, you’ve got the second level…

PLUME: Right now, you’re tops…

REINER: The best you can do right now!

PLUME: Touché! So I have to ask – is there anything left that you haven’t done, that you’d still like to do?

REINER: Yes… It’s something that I don’t think I’ll ever do now. When I was very young, and I heard Enrico Caruso sing “Pagliacci,” I said, “That’s what I want to do with my life! I want to be an opera singer!” I was 7 or 8 years old, and I had a wonderful voice. As a matter of fact, I sang in Broadway musicals. The only thing I’m missing is I have no rhythm and I sing off-key often, if there’s no music helping me. So if I had different genes or if someone could infuse a gene – or maybe the stem cell thing will find a gene for me – to make me so that I could sing. I would probably have a different career than I think I would want, and if I did have it, I’m sure it wouldn’t be as good as the one I have!

PLUME: Maybe you should just get a small electrical device implanted to shock you into tempo…

REINER: (laughing) Yes! As a matter of fact, in my first Broadway musical – Call Me Mister – the show opens on a bunch of guys, G.I.s, onstage in a military formation, and offstage you hear, “Sound off!” and they have to go, “One, two!” But I have to hit the right note, because they’re going to sing in the key I give them. I said, “Jesus Christ, I’m gonna goof it!” So they arranged for a trumpet to hit that note right before – “BAAA-RUUMPH” – so I never missed it. But if that trumpet weren’t there, I don’t know what would have happened…

PLUME: It would have been a whole set of keys…

REINER: Yeah!

PLUME: In listening to the opera music, was it the performance that drew you in, or just the music in general?

REINER: You grow up with what’s in the house, and your tastes are honed by that, and my father liked classical music. He listened to the Saturday afternoon operas from the Met, and he had these red seal records – one-sided records – and Caruso was one of the ones he had. And this was a soaring song – if you know “Pagliacci,” it soars. It makes your hair stand up! And I was thrilled by it, and I never lost the interest in hearing a good tenor belt opera.

PLUME: Do you in any way regret not being able to pursue that?

REINER: No, I don’t regret it. As a matter of fact, I had the best of two possible worlds – comedy and opera – when I did Your Show of Shows. I could always sing opera recitative, fake recitative, and when we got Earl Wild as the pianist, and he found a way that we could do operas – because you can’t follow recitative. I mean, how are you going to get an orchestra to play in the key you’re singing? But he did a brilliant thing… He said, “We’ll do the operas in the style of…” In other words, say if we did a Verdi opera, he d said, “We’ll take a song…” I remember the first one he suggested, which was “Santa Claus is Coming to Town” done in the style of either Verdi or Mozart. (Click here to hear the clip) The orchestra could be playing the key and we’d be singing gibberish, but “in the style of….” So I got to sing opera on Your Show of Shows, and it was very satisfying for me and, I think, for the audience! Did you notice I was singing fairly on key?

PLUME: (laughing) I did notice that…

REINER: (laughing) Yeah, okay… Just checking…

Continued below…

FROM THE VAULT: Armin Shimerman Interview

Filed under: Interviews — Tags: , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 2:29 am

vaultinterviews.png

Conducted ~5/2003

shimermanTo Star Trek fans, Armin Shimerman is the actor behind one of the most memorable characters to ever inhabit that universe – Deep Space Nine‘s Ferengi extraordinaire, Quark.

To Buffy fans, he will always be the ill-tempered Principal Snyder.

He’s also a distinguished stage actor and author (check out his Merchant Prince series), and was another in the long line of my in-depth interviews done on a whim.

I do, however, recall that this whim had its origins in a DVD-fueled binge of both Buffy and Deep Space Nine. Usually these types of immersive binges would lead me to begin tracking down various creators and castmembers of said shows and flicks. That was certainly the case here – and thankfully, I found a wonderful, down-to-earth, fascinating guy, and I hope that translates to print in the interview below.

lucyline.gif

KEN PLUME: Am I correct in understanding that you’re originally from Lakewood, New Jersey?

ARMIN SHIMERMAN: Yes … a small town in the mid-section of New Jersey, Ocean County. It was a great, great childhood and it was a terrific town – probably still is. I haven’t been there for decades. I keep waiting for them to invite me back to be sort of a VIP at one of their parades, but it hasn’t happened yet.

PLUME: So now you’re dropping hints…

SHIMERMAN: I am.

PLUME: How would you describe small town life in the ’50s?

SHIMERMAN: In the ’50s, yeah. Well, we went to a very small school. The town was dominated by the lake – it froze over in the winter and you skated on it in winter and you swam in it in summer. We kept the doors wide open, everybody knew everybody else… it was a small town. It had a lot of history, so we were always discovering new things about the town. That was kind of wonderful. We were right next door to Lakehurst. Most of my youth I watched the blimps fly over, because it was one of the last dirigible naval bases in the country. So we just grew up with blimps flying over all the time. When I look back on it now, I was very blessed to have been born there and to have grown up there.

PLUME: It almost seems like a stereotypical, ’50s childhood in a small town.

SHIMERMAN: It was. We had some problems, surely. My family was not very well-to-do, and I came from a divorced family and we were always struggling to make ends meet. But my brother and I never knew about that – my mother and my grandmother took care of that, sort of kept that from us. We had good friends, and great neighborhoods, and it didn’t seem to matter. It didn’t make any difference.

PLUME: And you were the first generation American citizen in your family, right?

SHIMERMAN: My mom was first generation on her side, but on my father’s side, I was indeed the first generation.

PLUME: Was there a certain view that you attained via that, as far as a certain way of viewing the country or the way you fit in?

SHIMERMAN: It wasn’t so much viewing the country, but because my father had struggled all of his life and actually had done well in his struggles, although he was always poor, he and my mother – my mother primarily – taught me to be self-reliant, to look towards goals, to try to achieve the best I could. One of the great things about the small town I was in was it had a terrific school system and my teachers were wonderful. They taught me a great deal, and with the tools that they gave me, when I finally moved to Los Angeles in my junior year of high school, I was way ahead of the class.

PLUME: At that time, if someone would have asked you when you were 14 or 15, what would you have said that your goals were?

SHIMERMAN: I probably would have told you that I was going to grow up to be an attorney. Or possibly a writer. When I was 11 or 12, I was doing some writing and actually got published in a magazine at that time. It was never a serious thing, because the family ethic was to grow up and make money. They were very disappointed when I became an actor. But an attorney seemed like the right thing. I’m not sure why, when I look back on it. But I’m sure that at that age that is exactly what I was telling people I was going to grow up to be.

PLUME: Just because it seemed like the right thing to do?

SHIMERMAN: Yeah, because it was the right thing to do.

PLUME: It’s kind of ironic, because didn’t your mother set you on the path to acting?

SHIMERMAN: In a sense. What she did was she had a distant cousin who was a drama teacher in Los Angeles, and when my family moved to Los Angeles when I was 16, she felt that a great way for me to make friends would be through this drama club that her distant cousin was running. That was the beginning of the end.

PLUME: Moving to L.A. must have been quite a culture shock.

SHIMERMAN: It was. It was a great culture shock.

PLUME: That was height of the ’60s, right?

SHIMERMAN: Yeah, we moved in, I would say ’65, ’66… I’m not really sure. One of those two years. I know when we moved to Los Angeles, as we were coming down the freeway for the first time, we saw smoke – it was exactly the week that the Watts riots happened. We moved to LA during the riots. But it was a cultural shock. It was a big city, and my brother and I weren’t really used to that.

PLUME: Was your natural tendency to withdraw within?

SHIMERMAN: Exactly. The tendency was to withdraw, to stay to ourselves, to sort of bitch and moan about the fact that we’d lost all our friends. But my mom made a tremendous sacrifice. She moved all of us for many reasons, but one of the primary reasons was so that I would have residency requirements for UCLA, which I eventually attended.

PLUME: Was it her understanding that you were going to be going for law?

SHIMERMAN: I don’t think she was specific about what I was supposed to go for, but she knew that I had to go to college, and she knew that the UC system was a terrifically good system and that you needed to be a resident of California for two years to get the special tuition rates. So she moved us out, as I said, in my junior year so that I would make the residency requirements. I don’t think she cared whether I was an attorney or not… I think she did care when I first told her I was going to be an actor, but that wasn’t really until after I graduated. The moment after I graduated, I immediately went to work for the Globe Theater in San Diego, and that was the path that I took for the rest of my life.

PLUME: When you were first applying …

SHIMERMAN: When I first applied, I had a poly-sci major, so I assumed I was going to be a lawyer.

PLUME: How quickly did the acting bug hit you – and what exactly was the drama club?

SHIMERMAN: The drama club was a local club that was attached to a local community center in Los Angeles. I joined that when we first moved here, and then in the senior year of my high school days, I no longer belonged to that club, because in the high school years, I continually did plays in high school and was the lead in two of the three productions we did that year.

PLUME: Which productions were they?

SHIMERMAN: The first one was The Crucible, John Proctor was the character. The second one, I was not the lead, but I played Claudius in Hamlet. The third was Mr. Antrobus in The Skin of Our Teeth.

PLUME: Rather intense characters…

SHIMERMAN: They were. I had a wonderful drama teacher, and he taught us to love great literature – especially Shakespeare. For many years after high school and college, that is primarily what I did, was classical theater.

PLUME: Did that instantly appeal to you?

SHIMERMAN: Yes… It was the language, it was the scope of the characters, it was the puzzle. When you work with Shakespeare, it’s a puzzle, and you have to solve the puzzle. It’s the solving of the puzzle that was always enormously important to me. Even to this day when I research Shakespeare, if I come upon a puzzle that I haven’t solved before, I spend most of the day trying to work it out.

PLUME: So it’s as much an intellectual exercise as it is an emotional one…

SHIMERMAN: Exactly.

PLUME: Right off the bat that struck you in that way?

SHIMERMAN: Yeah, yeah. Because the language was really hard for a high school student to understand. It was in English – you figure you should be able to understand it. My high school teacher, he helped me with the challenge and he also nurtured my talent and kept asking me to do more and more, and it was, I guess, part of being a small town kid – being in the large city, it was a way of disappearing out of the city and going into a more familiar world… even if it wasn’t familiar, it could be familiar after several weeks of rehearsal.

PLUME: Especially after you had invested the time to, as you say, unlock the puzzle.

SHIMERMAN: Right.

PLUME: So it was almost a mastering of the domain within which you’d placed yourself…

SHIMERMAN: Exactly. Ironically enough, the local business that I own is called Mastering Shakespeare, so mastering is exactly the right word.

Continued below…

/

FROM THE VAULT: Brent Spiner Interview

Filed under: Interviews — Tags: , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 2:24 am

vaultinterviews.png

Conducted ~11/2002

spinerHe’ll probably be forever immortalized as the android Data from Star Trek: The Next Generation.

But Brent Spiner is also an accomplished stage (Sunday In The Park With George, 1776) and screen (Introducing Dorothy Dandridge, Independence Day) actor.

But yes, he will probably always be Data – not that there’s anything wrong with that.

I’m can’t recall the exact rationale for doing the interview, though it may have just been the recurring theme in the bulk of the interviews I’ve done – a whim. I do recall that Brent was a good sport when it came to the length of the interview, which he generally didn’t do at the time.

Here it is…

lucyline.gif

KEN PLUME: Am I correct in understanding you’re a Texas native?

BRENT SPINER: Correct.

PLUME: Houston?

SPINER: That’s even right.

PLUME: This would be Texas in the ’50s, early ’60s?

SPINER: My time in Texas?

PLUME: Your frame of reference…

SPINER: Pretty much, yeah.

PLUME: What was that atmosphere like at that time? You hear about that being a turbulent time in certain other areas of the country, but you never really get to hear about what was going on in Texas…

SPINER: Houston was a really great place to grow up. I don’t recall it being turbulent, but I recall it being really pleasant. It wasn’t that big a town then – I mean, it was big, but it wasn’t like it is now. It wasn’t like a huge metropolis. I remember the Shamrock Hilton Hotel – it was sort of the focal point, the center point of Houston. That hotel was actually the hotel that I believe was in the movie Giant – the opening of that hotel is what Jett Rink’s hotel was. That’s because it was opened originally – before the Hilton’s got it – by a guy named Glen McCarthy, who basically James Dean was playing in Giant. He was the wildcatter.

PLUME: Would you say that it was the cosmopolitan center of Houston at that time?

SPINER: Definitely … The big ballroom there was where all the touring greats performed – at the Shamrock Hilton. IF you were ever going to see somebody, it would be there.

PLUME: Was it a place that you frequented for those type of performances?

SPINER: Well, I really frequented it for the swimming pool, which was gigantic. The biggest swimming pool I’ve still ever seen. It was just where all the kids hung out in the summer. And I mean kids, because we were young when we were there. I remember nights in Houston, and our idea of a good time… there was a place called the Blue Bonnet Gardens that served watermelon. To date myself, these were the days when you could only get watermelon in the summer.

PLUME: When it was truly a seasonal product.

SPINER: Exactly. Houston had air conditioning, but not much, so to cool off you’d go out for a drive at night and then go to the Blue Bonnet Gardens for watermelon.

PLUME: It was generally confined to businesses, it wasn’t really a residential thing at the time, the air conditioning and such?

SPINER: Oh yeah, hardly anyone had – I remember the first air conditioner we got was a window unit. I would sit in front of it about 12 hours a day, just looking at it and praying to it – the god of cool air.

PLUME: At what age was that?

SPINER: Probably around 7.

PLUME: So at that point it was a very revelatory moment.

SPINER: It truly was. Really, when I think about Houston and what we did, it’s an odd thing because my mother did the same thing when she was a child, and I’m sure the kids today – well, I don’t know if they’re doing it today – but for years the tradition in Houston for kids, like 11-13, in that area, was to get on a bus, take the bus downtown, go to a place called James’ Coney Island for a hotdog, and then go to a movie at one of the three downtown movie theaters that were palaces… you know, those big movie theaters that don’t exist anymore.

PLUME: So it was all first run …

SPINER: Yeah… big, beautiful – I remember when The Ten Commandments opened, they turned the whole place into an Egyptian motif… which it remained. The Metropolitan Theater remained Egyptian for years.

PLUME: That was one of the first Scope films, wasn’t it?

SPINER: I think it was.

PLUME: So it must have been an impressive sight.

SPINER: Oh, it was. Anytime you went to the movies in those days it was impressive, because it was a big deal. Do you remember Road Show engagements? I remember seeing Lawrence of Arabia on a road show engagement. I’m not sure exactly what that meant, but I think you had your tickets in advance and there was always an intermission.

PLUME: Wasn’t it the movie equivalent of going to a play? “This is the destination – this is what we’re doing for the evening?”

SPINER: Yeah, absolutely.

PLUME: How big an influence was television at that time in your life?

SPINER: Huge, huge. My mother owned a furniture store when I was a kid. I say my mother, because my father passed away when I was 10 months old. That’s why I don’t reference him as much. But my mother had a furniture store that had been my father’s, and she ran it through the first 7, 8 years of my life. So we had a television pretty early on. I know from the age of about… certainly 2 or 3… we had gotten a television by then. I used to sit in front of it in the morning and watch the test pattern for at least a good two hours before television came on. And that really dates me, because there were test patterns then. It was an Indian head.

PLUME: How mesmerizing was even the test pattern?

SPINER: Oh, it was fantastic.

PLUME: I just can’t imagine something like that… it must have been like having the equivalent of a movie in your home.

SPINER: It was, and it was the 50’s so we were watching – do you know the film Avalon? It’s a brilliant movie, and it really captured that whole feeling of what it was like to get a TV back then, what it meant; and how it probably destroyed America as a family.

PLUME: Provided too good a distraction…

SPINER: Exactly. But I remember watching television in the early days, and the things that really just grabbed me, like Sid Caesar, and Berle, and Steve Allen, and that kind of stuff.

PLUME: It’s interesting to hear where your tastes gravitated towards at that time.

SPINER: Oh, I know… One of the great nights of my life, and this is really embarrassing to say, is that I watched Lucy, first run.

PLUME: Embarrassing from which perspective?

SPINER: How old I am, actually. But it was, I think it was Tuesday or Wednesday nights, Lucy, and it was incredible because most people now that watch Lucy have seen them at least 50 or 60 times. But we had a new Lucy, every week.

PLUME: And the concept of reruns was completely alien…

SPINER: Oh, totally. They were doing like 36 shows a year then, maybe 48.

PLUME: And summers was what, summer replacement shows at that time – as opposed to summer reruns…

SPINER: Exactly. Summer replacement shows that I remember really getting on to – well, I really fondly remember the era of Warner Brother Westerns… with Lawman, and Cheyenne, and Bronco Lane, and all that kind of stuff.

Continued below…

FROM THE VAULT: Nick Frost Interview

Filed under: Interviews — Tags: , , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 2:16 am

vaultinterviews.png

Conducted ~9/2005

frostTo the majority of the American audience, their first introduction to Nick Frost was as Shaun’s slovenly (yet loveable) best friend Ed in Shaun of the Dead.

To the UK audience (and the hipper element of the American audience), however, Frost hit the scene in Simon Pegg & Jessica Stevenson’s sitcom Spaced, where his turn as “intense” best friend Mike proved to be a favorite in a show full of stellar writing and memorable performances.

As himself, Frost was the presenter of Danger! 50,000 Volts!, a reality series that found him giving survival tips on scenarios ranging from dehydration in the desert to subduing a crocodile (think of it as TV version of The Worst Case Scenario Handbook).

More recently, Frost co-starred in Hot Fuzz, Simon Pegg and director Edgar Wright’s follow-up to Shaun, and was the lead in two series of BBC2’s sci-fi sitcom Hyperdrive as Space Commander Henderson, the captain of a 22nd century British spaceship tasked with trying to get aliens to relocate their businesses to England (in competition with the Americans, who are offering Florida).

My interview with Nick was another one of those “Oh, what the heck…” ones, as I just had an impulse to try and track him down and do exactly what follows – a candid conversation on his life and career. So enough of the formalities – let’s get this show rolling…

lucyline.gif

KEN PLUME: Tell me about your early life…

NICK FROST: Oh, god. Seriously?

PLUME: What made you give up a doctorate in physics to pursue acting?

FROST: (laughs) Um, well, I didn’t…I left school when I was fifteen.

PLUME: Your choice?

FROST: Yes and no, really. I mean, I wasn’t very good at school and my parents were not very well. They were quite sick. And so, I kinda felt as if I had to leave school to financially support them. Do you know what I mean?

PLUME: Certainly…

FROST: I kinda felt like I had an obligation to do that.

PLUME: Was this a decision that they supported? Did they understand where you were coming from in that?

FROST: I don’t even know if they kinda knew, do you know what I mean? I kinda kept it to myself and told them: I’m not very good at school, and, you know, I’m not a scholar. You know, you need a bit of money, we need some money, so why not, you know, why not let’s just leave school and get a job, you know?

PLUME: Was it a difficult decision for you or did you have to really mull it over a bit?

FROST: Not really, you know, I didn’t at that stage…you know, I didn’t…I was a very different person, Ken, I was really different to who I am now. To leave school and having to go to work it seemed… normal, you know?

PLUME: How would you describe the person you were then?

FROST: Oh god, I would say… a loutish idiot.

PLUME: Was that a nature issue?

FROST: Well, you know, I’m from a working class… it sounds really f***ing hackneyed, but I’m from a working class background, so being a man in a working class kinda background, you become a certain type of person, you know?

PLUME: Right.

FROST: And I was that person. Even right up until I was seventeen, when I left home and went and lived in Israel. And that changed me. That was my university, in a way.

PLUME: What led to that decision to make that drastic a move?

FROST: Well, I – this is really in-depth now, but I was having trouble with drugs and stuff. And I kinda made the choice to… you know, someone said to me, “It would be better if you were to leave the country for your own good and for your own health.” And I did.

PLUME: Was it something that you were an active participant in or were people pushing you into, “this really is the right decision”?

FROST: No, I loved it. I loved it. I mean, I do have that thing in me. Well I think I had it in me more than I do now, but… you’re with a group of mates and it just felt really natural, you know, to get off your head. That’s a very London-sounding saying, isn’t it?

PLUME: We’ll put a glossary at the end…

FROST: “To get off your head!” Sound like someone from Snatch. But yeah, you know, I mean, I was sixteen, seventeen, and it just seemed… it was normal. It wasn’t (horrified whisper) “Oh my God, we’re doing drugs!” it was just… you know, you got in your car and you drove and then you’d take some drugs and you’d laugh a lot. And it wasn’t anything more sinister than that, you know.

PLUME: Was it something that you saw that could develop into an issue?

FROST: Well, I mean… yeah. That was what made me go away and so, for me to have moved three thousand miles away, you can probably guess that it was getting a bit serious.

PLUME: Was it developing into enough of an issue to make that serious a move?

FROST: Yeah.

PLUME: What led to the decision for the destination to be Israel?

FROST: I had a friend called Brendan who went and lived on a kibbutz and he was older than me, much older than me, and I kind of sought his advice, and he said, “Go to Israel,” you know. And it was the best decision I ever made, I think.

PLUME: How much of a wake up call was it to be that far away?

FROST: It was great. I loved it. It just felt… I was meant to stay for three months, and I ended up staying for almost two years.

PLUME: What did you do during that period?

FROST: Oh God, I just… it just felt right to be there. And I just loved it and I just wholeheartedly kind of, you know, embraced the lifestyle. And…what did I do? God, I worked in the fish ponds. And I picked cotton and I picked apples. And I worked in a plastics factory. And I…what else did I do?

PLUME: Are you sure you didn’t live in the American south?

FROST: Yeah, I was doing all that. I lived in Louisiana for a time – no, I didn’t think of it. Yeah, you know, it was lot of… it was manual work. And I kind of like that. I like that kind of… you know, you can see why people become addicted to the army and prison.

PLUME: That sort of regimented work ethic?

FROST: Exactly. You get up at half-past five, you go to work, you come home, someone gives you cigarettes, someone gives you a bag of clean laundry, you know, you swim for an hour, then you sleep for two, then it’s dinnertime. But I loved it. I really loved it. And I didn’t want to come home, but, you know, you think: well, I’m now almost twenty… I had to go home. That and I got…caught. I got caught. I got caught and arrested and deported. Because I’d overstayed my visa by, you know, fourteen months.

PLUME: So one way or another you were going back home.

FROST: Yeah.

PLUME: But mentally did you feel somewhat that you had made a decision that you needed to go back?

FROST: God, let me think. That’s a long time ago. Probably. I mean, I’d fallen in love with a girl… with a couple of girls. And they had gone back to England. And you know, it was that kind of thing. I believe that everything just kind of goes in a cycle, you know, so the people that we had on the kibbutz who were really cool and amazing, and the kind of amazing time we were having, suddenly wasn’t so amazing, and all the cool people were going, and loads of new people came… and I just felt, well, f*** it, I’m just gonna go home.

PLUME: Did you have any kind of idea what you were going back to? Did you ever fear that you would go back into the pattern that had sent you to Israel in the first place?

FROST: No, not really… I mean…

PLUME: Or did you already feel that you were a different person by then, than the one that had left?

FROST: Well, yeah, I was. Because I… that was it then, I’d left home. I left home when I was seventeen. And I never went back, I mean – I went back, but I never went and lived back with my parents. I mean, that was it. I just came back and moved in with one of the girls that I’d fallen for and then that was my life then, and everything that got me into my troubles before Israel was left back in another part of London, you know?

PLUME: So this would have been what, around the early 90s?

FROST: Yeah. Yeah, I’m originally from a place called Essex and all my mates and stuff were in Essex. But when I came back from Israel, I moved to a place called Kentish Town, which is in the north of London. And so, you know, I’ve never been one for going back – I never look on Friends Reunited, I’ve never gone to a school reunion, I’ve never really gotten in contact with anyone from my school… I kinda think about this, and I think, “Is it bad? Is it sad?”

PLUME: Is the motivating factor, as you said, just to not look back, or do you consider that such a different time and a different person that there’s really nothing to revisit?

FROST: Yeah, I think it’s kinda nothing to revisit, you know? You know, it wasn’t incredibly enjoyable, and, you know, even though I had good friends, it wasn’t “we’re friends for life.” The friends I’ve got now are, you know, the proper, real deal friends for life. And I’d just… you know, I’d just f***ing die for them.

PLUME: As you said, there’s a difference between the friends you make in high school and the friends you make in college, as it were.

FROST: Yeah. And there’s that thing, especially when you’re on kibbutz, you know, people are coming and going all the time, so there’s that thing where you say, “Oh my god, I love you so much, I’m going to miss you so much, I’m going to cry everyday and I don’t know how I’ll get through life without you,” and then, you know, four or five days later, you think, “Who was that person?”

PLUME: As you’re busy collaborating with the new people.

FROST: (Laughs) Yeah, exactly. I think my time in Israel has kind of painted me with that kind of, you know, once people go, it’s: “Oh, well, that was nice.”

PLUME: So in some ways it really prepared you for being an actor.

FROST: Yeah, that kind of lonely…

PLUME: Moving from production to production.

FROST: Yeah. Exactly. But, god, I’d never… I mean, I came home and I had no qualifications, I had never been to school really, I hadn’t been to university – I had never even thought about university, you know, and I was a young man and just didn’t know what I wanted, really. And I don’t think, to be honest, I knew… even now probably what I want. Do you know what I mean?

PLUME: Well, you could always go back and finish that doctorate.

FROST: Yeah, of course I could.

Continued below…

FROM THE VAULT: Graham Norton Interview

Filed under: Interviews — Tags: , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 2:09 am

vaultinterviews.png

Conducted ~2/2003 & ~8/2004

Graham Norton may not be a household name here in the United States, but he’s certainly made an impact in the UK.

A few years back, I became hooked on his Channel 4 show, So Graham Norton, which soon morphed into the nightly V Graham Norton. It was brilliant not only for its humor, but also for what it got away with (which would seem shocking to American viewers raised on the comparatively tame Carson, Leno, Letterman, and Conan). A sexual, scatological, pop culture blender unhindered by the often Puritanical bent of network TV in the US, his show was anything but buttoned-down.

Norton himself is an impish whirligig, chatting up guests spanning an eclectic spectrum ranging from Cher and Dustin Hoffman to Lindsey Wagner and the mom from The Waltons. Hell, he even journeyed to the States to do an episode at Dollywood. He’s also keen on audience participation and games that exist somewhere in the realm between camp and delirious rubbish.

After his lengthy run at Channel 4, he was given a short run on Comedy Central, titled The Graham Norton Effect, presenting essentially the same show. However, Comedy Central decided (foolishly, methinks) not to renew, and Graham went back to England.

Upon arriving back in England, Graham struck a massive pact with the BBC. After a few confused years bopping around as the Beeb tried to decide what to do with him, someone finally had the bright of idea of letting him do what he does best, resulting in his talk show return with The Graham Norton Show – a near identical clone of his Channel 4 heyday.

I originally tracked down and chatted with Norton during his V Graham Norton period, going in-depth into his background. I then followed that up with a second interview as he was about to begin his run on Comedy Central.

Hope you enjoy them both…

lucyline.gif

KEN PLUME: You were born in Dublin?

GRAHAM NORTON: Born in Dublin, but never really lived there. When I was about two, I think, my family started to move around Ireland. My dad worked at Guinness, the brewery, and I think he must have been a bit rubbish at his job, because they just kept transferring him all the time. It wasn’t until I was about 14, 15 that we settled in a place called Bandon, County Cork, which is down in the south.

PLUME: So this was what – late ’60s, early ’70s, mid ’70s that you’re coming of age in Ireland?

NORTON: Yeah, that’s when I was kind of aware of things – kind of early ’70s, I suppose. What would I would have been… around 7 or 8 then.

PLUME: What was the social fabric like in Ireland at that time?

NORTON: Well, Ireland – it was a place apart. Although it was very close to England and close to Europe, it was a world apart. It was a very old fashioned place, I would say. But in lots of ways, I was kind of slightly outside the fabric of society, particularly because it was Southern Ireland – because I was growing up as a Protestant in Southern Ireland.

PLUME: What is that like? That almost sounds like an outsider in a room of outsiders.

NORTON: Well, it is slightly, in that I think it was 1% or 2% of the population are Protestant. So, you know, we went to Protestant schools and things. I never knew – mostly we lived out in the middle of nowhere, so there was no one to know. But whenever we did live with neighbors, and they had kids, I would never know those kids, because I didn’t go to school with them. Yeah, it was isolated, I suppose, but not miserable or anything. I think I quite liked it.

PLUME: Were there the same frictions in the South, as there were in the North?

NORTON: No, not at all, because everyone just got on it with it. The mix of the population, because it was so Catholic – essentially, Southern Ireland is complete Catholic. There was no conflict… You know, 2% of the population – if they’re not happy, really, they should move.

PLUME: And really, how much of a threat is 2%?

NORTON: Really. And they’re Protestants, they’re nice Protestants.

PLUME: In comparing the social structure, was it just that the conflict became socialized in the North as opposed to the South?

NORTON: Well, no, I think the North it was to do with Sovereignty. You know, in the South, because it become a Republic, I think the Protestants who remained there, chose that. They decided it. Whereas the Catholics in the North, didn’t. It was just a situation very badly handled at the time, and they did it, it was a quick fix to turn the six counties into that kind of little adjunct of Britain.

PLUME: But it really wasn’t a fix, was it?

NORTON: Ah, no. Short term solution, and presumably all the politicians who made that decision quickly retired, going, “Phew.”

PLUME: It’s all on paper. Well, how would you describe your childhood? Would you say you were isolated away from the other children wherever you would move just by nature of the school you would go to?

NORTON: I mean, it all sounds quite miserable in that it was quite isolated, so it’s one of those odd things. When I talk about it, I do kind of think, “God, that sounds miserable.” But I don’t remember it as being miserable. I remember watching lots of television… television was my friend. But I was quite happy about that. It would have irritated me if people had come around and interrupted my viewing habit. I grew up in a one station environment – it was only one television station. But they bought in mostly, because a lot of culture links with Southern Ireland are far closer to America than to Britain. Lots of the TV they bought us, was American.

PLUME: So would it be America of the 1950s, 1960s, or current American fare? How outdated was it?

NORTON: Oh, it was a real mix of things. You felt like they’d buy like one hot show – like they’d buy Charlie’s Angels or something – but then in order to buy that, they’d have to buy lower stuff. So suddenly you’d be watching Charlie’s Angels, but you’d also be seeing That GirlI Love Lucy was there. What else did we get? We got a lot of really odd shows that they never got here (in the UK), like The Flip Wilson Show – which I remember really, really liking …

PLUME: So it was an entertainment potpourri…

NORTON: Yeah, it was a real entertainment potpourri, but like I say, more heavily dominated by American shows than British.

PLUME: What was your preference? Of the shows you would watch…

NORTON: I loved Lucille Ball growing up. I remember liking The Flip Wilson Show that was on. I supposed I was just generally drawn to American programs more than British programs. British programs, it looked like Ireland. There were hedgerows and things, where it was exciting in America. There were no hedgerows in between houses. Shared lawns – it was very thrilling to us.

PLUME: There was space between houses…

NORTON: Yeah, that too.

PLUME: What was the view, then, through the prism that you were looking through, of America?

NORTON: It was very odd. I thought I was looking at America, I thought I was seeing America on television. It’s only when you go to America, you realize, “Oh, no – I was looking at California.” That’s all I was seeing, ever … It was a real surprise when I finally got to California and realized, “Oh, this is where they make television. Now I get it.”

PLUME: Well, how was your view, then, of the UK?

NORTON: The UK to me, just seemed – I thought Britain was a much more urban place, a much more sophisticated place, and in a way kind of frightening. Because, I remember I was getting into my teens, and punk rock arrived, and I just remember being so depressed, because I was thinking, “Oh no!” Finally I’m old enough to go out – I don’t want to be dirty and be spitting on people. America on that level always appealed much more, in that it always seemed kind of more glamorous, whereas Britain was always a bit grungy, a bit real … You could tell that people were living in the same sort of economy as we were, and they were just making the best of it.

Continued below…

FROM THE VAULT: Bob Balaban Interview

vaultinterviews.png

Conducted ~11/2002

Over the course of his 40 year career, Bob Balaban has worn numerous hats. He’s been a writer, a director, and a producer, but he’s most well known as an actor, appearing in Catch-22, Midnight Cowboy, 2010, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, many Christopher Guest films, Seinfeld – just to name only a few.

It was in Close Encounters that he played the role of the translator, David Laughlin, and it was the on-set relationship with Francios Truffaut during the film that formed the backbone of his wonderful – and highly recommended – memoir of this period, Spielberg, Truffaut and Me: An Actor’s Diary, which provided a good enough excuse to do this interview.

The real reason, though, is that Balaban’s one of those actors you always see on the screen, and his is a career I thought would be fascinating to find out about. I certainly enjoyed finding out more about him, and I hope you do, as well.

Here’s my interview with Bob Balaban…

lucyline.gif

KEN PLUME: Am I correct in understanding that you’re from a Hollywood dynasty?

BOB BALABAN: A very quiet Hollywood dynasty. My dad was born in Chicago in 1908… his parents came from Russia. They settled in Chicago, where they lived in a little tiny grocery store with eight or nine children – in the backroom all together – and my grandmother got the idea to go into the movie business. She basically went to a nickelodeon one day with two of the older brothers – Barney and John, I believe – and realized that there was this thing called the movie business, where, when the product got stale, you didn’t throw it away like an old bunch of lettuce – you merely sent it back to the movie company and they sent you back another movie. So immediately, this appealed to her. Also, it was a business that was never done on credit, while their little struggling grocery business was a lot of people writing down chits and then never paying it back, because my grandfather was a very sweet person and hated to collect from other poor people. So the movie business was the perfect thing for them, and about a couple years later they had built several theaters. By the ’20s in Chicago, they had the largest chain of theaters in the Mid-west and eventually merged with Paramount. My Uncle Barney, my father’s oldest brother, became Chairman of the Board and President of Paramount in the ’30s and remained for many years. Sam Katz, who was the partner in Balaban and Katz – who was at that point married to my aunt – went off to run MGM and become head of production for many years, including the musical years with all those great things they did in Arthur Freed’s musical unit.

PLUME: How much of that legacy was surrounding you during your childhood years?

BALABAN: Nothing. I was basically unaware of it. First of all, if your relatives are doing something when you’re born, you kind of assume – I did, anyway – that it was unusual. I didn’t pay too much attention to it. Later on, I’m now completely fascinated in everything they did, and it’s just so historically interesting to me, I wish I knew more about it. I’m always trying to read about it and talk to older relatives, very old relatives at this point, obviously, and I’m really, really interested in it. But as a kid, I wasn’t aware of it particularly, other than the fact that I could go to movies for free.

PLUME: Were your childhood years spent in the Hollywood area?

BALABAN: No, no, no….

PLUME: Or were you part of the Chicago contingent?

BALABAN: You have to remember – the theaters were in Chicago, my parents always stayed in Chicago… as did most of the relatives. Barney eventually moved to New York, because Paramount Pictures was run out of New York – even though the studio was in Los Angeles, the ownership was always in New York.

PLUME: The actual corporate offices…

BALABAN: Yeah, they always were. Even when Gulf and Western took over, there were big offices on 1500 Columbus Circle. But you have to remember, the Paramount building was 1501 Broadway – it’s still there. It’s a great old building, and Barney, I’m sure, used to fly to California frequently, and certainly was on the phone, I’m sure, all the time, but didn’t spend much time in Los Angeles.

PLUME: But the main home base for the family was still in Chicago.

BALABAN: Yeah, a lot of Chicago relatives.

PLUME: How long did the family own this theater chain?

BALABAN: Oh, I guess 30 years or something – 40 years? Longer.

PLUME: Was your father involved in that business at all?

BALABAN: My dad was the baby. When he was born they were already successful. They sent him to business school – he probably would have loved to have been a poet or a writer or something, and he was very creative. This never went away for him. When he got older, they helped set him up in business in a chain of art houses in Chicago. He built a wonderful, landmark theater in Chicago called the Esquire Theater, and owned the Chicago and the Carnegie, and some other wonderful theaters where I loved going when I was a teenager, and eventually became a pioneer in cable television and owned and operated a series of stations around the country… also some radio stations and other things. He was the baby, he was more into some of the new technology, and was very forward thinking, all the time. Great man… he died last year at the age of 92.

PLUME: Am I correct that he was also a pioneer in the idea of pay-per-view?

BALABAN: Yes, he was. As early as the late ’50s, as I remember it, he was working with an inventor to try to figure out some kind of way that you could get first run movies and other special events into your home, on your television set, by paying per view. At one point he came home with a box that you put quarters into, that would enable a signal to be transmitted, release the signal, and you could see all these amazing things for 50 cents or a dollar, whatever it turned out to be. This obviously was not the wave of the future, technologically, but it obviously was – he had grasped immediately the concept of how much …

PLUME: Convenience entertainment?

BALABAN: Convenience entertainment, not leaving the house. I mean, the whole idea of movies was it was special to go to see – you went to a movie theater to see something that was magical and amazing, in a very special location. But obviously as television began, it so undercut movies that he was trying to think of a way to combine seeing these special things, and the fact that people were just captivated by the magic box.

PLUME: So, monetarily, the best of both worlds.

BALABAN: Yeah. And it still proves to be.

PLUME: How would you describe your childhood?

BALABAN: A lot of puppets. I was very much in my room with my marionette stage, you know, creating these incredibly boring things that I felt were so fascinating, and forcing my relatives to come, and charging money for them to see my little productions.

PLUME: What were the standard thematics behind the productions that you would mount?

BALABAN: Oh, I never thought about it thematically too much… I’d be embarrassed to talk about it. But I’m kidding – ultimately it was thematically about lost people. I was probably writing sort of existential, Sartre-like puppet shows long before I had ever read No Exit. That’s what my puppet shows were like – you can imagine. We had people on clouds, floating about, not knowing where they were or what life really was, and people, characters, who would populate a play and then turned out not to be real.

PLUME: So definitely not the standard Punch and Judy that other kids would be doing…

BALABAN: No. If anyone would have been paying serious attention to my puppet shows, I would have been sent to therapy very young.

PLUME: Were they issues you were working out, or …

BALABAN: There was no working out. I’m from the Midwest, and I loved my family. I had a very good time as a child, but I was also – I have a theory about Jews growing up in the Midwest, that there is an ultimately sort of wonderful avoidance of a lot of things, and a great acceptance of whatever is happening. Which, if it’s okay and it’s nothing too terrible, you were kind of left to grow up on your own. My family was loving… they were very supportive and very affectionate, and basically I could do what I wanted, and basically it wasn’t anything dangerous, thank God.

PLUME: So do you think it was more a matter of living in the now, as opposed to forward thinking?

BALABAN: Yes, I would say it was very much that. You know, “They’re okay, the kids, let them be – they’ll be fine.” And more or less, we were.

Continued below…

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress