FRED Entertainment

February 2, 2010

A Bit Of A Chat with Ken Plume & The Dawson Bros.

bitofachat-header.png

lucyline.gif

I’m Ken Plume, and soon you’ll be listening to “A Bit Of A Chat” with me, Ken Plume.

In this episode, I chat with the UK writing trio The Dawson Bros. – Andrew Dawson, Steve Dawson, & Tim Inman – who’ve toiled in obscurity behind the scenes of THE PETER SERAFINOWICZ SHOW, TOTAL WIPEOUT, Funny Or Die UK (and much more), and are about to unleash their sketch pilot, HAPPY FINISH, in the near future.

Hope you enjoy…

Download “A Bit of a Chat with Ken Plume & The Dawson Bros.“:

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/bitofachat/bit_of_a_chat-dawson_bros.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

##

patreon-fred.png

Drop Ken a line HERE.

##

You can also find more of my interviews by clicking HERE.

lucyline.gif

Bagged & Boarded 46: Like, all over?

Filed under: Bagged & Boarded — Tags: , , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 5:03 pm

baggedboardedheader.jpg

What happens when two young men let their love of movies, comic books, and all things “geek” take over their lives? They run away from their families, bringing only the most essential DVDs and comics to their secret, highly fortified underground bunker in sunny Southern California, where they start recording podcasts that will change the world.

Are they heroes?

No.

Are they geniuses?

Far from it.

Are they the future of this planet?

I sure hope not.

Simply put… Matt Cohen and Jesse Rivers are “Bagged and Boarded”.

linesm.gif

BAGGED & BOARDED #46: Like, all over? – In which Matt and Jesse take a look at the current state of technology, the definition of “Sports”, and whether or not we live in the fourth dimension. Hint: We don’t.

[CONTENT WARNING]: This podcast may contain some foul language and horribly off-color jokes. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
Episode #46 (MP3 format)

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/baggedboarded/bagged_boarded-46.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

Got something to say? E-mail Matt & Jesse at the B & B mailbag.

line.gif

CLICK HERE FOR THE BAGGED & BOARDED ARCHIVES

line.gif

##

Musical MySpace Tour #5

Filed under: Musical Myspace Tour — Tags: , , , — UncaScroogeMcD @ 4:26 pm

myspacemusic.png

That’s right. I’m back.

The only regular article on the internet entirely powered by the “send friend request” button on MySpace*. Indeed, I will only review bands and musicians who try to become an e-friend with me on MySpace. I will only review them and I will review ALL of them. The good and the bad. And if you have a MySpace profile yourself then you’ll know that the majority of them are fucking terrible.

However, I’m going to attempt to add some light and fun to the mission by forgetting that these fine folks have feelings. Is it wrong of me to be so harsh? Probably, but they spammed me on a social networking site and on the internet these days… there are no rules. I mean, have you seen all that porn?

Sometimes though, I can be just plain wrong and in my last article I credited the guitar work on a song called kick to Chris Geddes and not the artist herself, Femmepop. And while he did feature on the song it was Femmepop who did all the strumming. Apologies to her, and if you’d like to check out the song yourself just head on over to www.myspace.com/femmepop.

While the GRAMMYs were on over the weekend I paid no attention to it whatsoever. Never have so few been nominated so much for so little. All I will mention is that in 2010, The Ting Tings and MGMT are NOT new artists.

But lets see what our 5th stop on the tour has in store for us. Something crap? Something fantastic? Or something fantastically crap?

*To my knowledge and if I don’t know about it, it doesn’t exist.
————————————————————————
LOS FAHINA
www.myspace.com/losfahina

Welcome to your new favourite band.

This seven piece band claim to come from Tabasco, Mexico and are made up of members Juan Lennon, Paolo McCartney, Gringo Starr, Juan Ponchovi, 50 Pesos and Malcolm. In their friend request they tell me “We gratest band in South America, that undenyible”. I don’t know where they are really from, I’m starting to think it’s somewhere in the UK, but I find it hard to disagree with their logic. You MUST listen to them.

They have 4 original songs and 3 inspired covers/parodies. Their play-list opens with “I Like To Do Sexx Up A Girls” and if there was ever a song which could truly give you a taste for what you’re in for, it’s this. With the fantastically fake Mexican accents and rude/bizarre lyrics you will either instantly fall in love or hate them forever. I landed in the former. They would have won me over pretty easily just by covering “Deeply Dippy” (a Right Said Fred song which I have gone on record before to claim is one of the greatest pop songs ever written) but they made it their own once again adopting a very skewed approach to songwriting by making it about a pensioner. The electric keyboard added to panpipes with authentically paced songs (or at least stereotypically paced songs) just creates a style more infectious than any “serious” band I’ve heard in the last couple of years.

I would LOVE to catch Los Fahina live. They play in full get-up including sombreros, ponchos and moustaches. If you check out their picture folders you’ll seen some inspired photo-shopping of the band in different scenarios. My favourite being them outside a shanty EMI building.

Some of the videos are even better than the songs. Just the fact that they covered the theme tune for Home & Away makes them heroes in my book.

Now I don’t want for a second to make the impression that just because these guys are a “comedy” band that the musicianship isn’t there. In fact I might even argue that what they do here takes more skill than the generic rock that I often find doing these reviews. It’s hard to make songs sound as amazingly bad as they do here.

Catchy, witty and all round entertaining. I can’t say enough things to encourage you to go check out Las Fahina. Just do it already! It’s criminal that their site hits are so low.

Presentation = 4/5
Content = A good amount of videos and songs.
Music = 4/5
Friend Request = ACCEPTED!

————————————————————————–
musical-poweragePOWERAGE
www.myspace.com/powerageband

Powerage hail from New South Wales, Australia and are made up of two sets of brothers whose ages range from 13 to 19. Now this is an important point as it really effects my review of this band in both positive and negative ways.

The type of music that Messrs Crawford and Minett play is essentially 80s metal. The sort of thing you would hear Iron Maiden or AC/DC do. In fact the lead singer has a little hint of Bruce Dickinson in him. Now if you’re not familiar with 80s metal it’s essentially about partying hard and seeing women as objects. What was beautiful about it was that you genuinely believed that the bands of that era lived the rock and roll lifestyle to it’s fullest. If they weren’t in a pool with naked women and a sunken Lamborghini, well you were disappointed. Most of those guys died trying to live up to our expectations. So I find it strange that such young guys as Powerage are play this sort of thing as well as they do.

Their songs like Rock Star Living sing of “wasted youth”. An interesting lyric to use considering they’re currently living their own. The music is convincing, it’s clear that they have been raised on the source material (in fact you’ll see a picture of their dads in one of their folders and they look like survivors of the industry themselves). The boys can even be seen in vintage rock t-shirts in nearly all their photos but it’s hard to see past that they’re singing about things they don’t know. Most of the bands they mimic burnt out before they were born. Which begs the question why they refer to themselves as “modern rock” more than once on their profile page when it’s clearly classic rock they’re playing.

But I feel I’m being harsh on Powerage. They play well and can only improve with such time on their side so if they’re more than competent now it will be fascinating to see where they go from here. There is a worry that a band formed so early in years will only drift apart as the young men find themselves. How many of us still love to do now what we did when we were teenagers? And looking at porn doesn’t count.

At the end of the day though, despite their quality, I find it hard to take a rock band seriously if I feel it inappropriate to say “fuck” around them.

Presentation = 3/5
Content = A nice balance of stuff but maybe too much promo info.
Music = 3.5/5
Friend Request = DENIED!

————————————————————————
musical-sheavesTHE SHEAVES
www.myspace.com/thesheaves

The Sheaves throw up a conundrum to me. I’m new enough to this music review lark, this is only my fifth in a series. Sometimes the band make it easy for me to review them by being utter shit. Others are fun or impressive and I struggle to find the words that can convey the special tight feeling in my pants which they give me. And then there are the likes of The Sheaves. I really don’t know what to make of them.

This group of experienced musicians categorise themselves as “Rock / Alternative / Psychedelic”. Now we don’t get too many bands around here who describe themselves as being psychedelic without a tongue planted firmly in cheek but I can tell that these boys are aiming for that mantle. I would describe them as stoners if I didn’t think the term “hippy” was more appropriate. Now I’m not for a second suggestion that these upstanding men from Tennessee take part in any illegal narcotics but I’d make a bet that their basement smells of incense.

I’ll try listing the positive things and negatives separately.

Positive: They have an unusual sound. They obviously are good musicians. The recording quality of these songs, for an unsigned band, is pretty good. They have up to 5000 plays on some songs so they must have good support. It’s clear that they conduct themselves professionally.

Negative: The lead singer’s voice bugs the hell out of me. Most songs go on too long, by a couple of minutes in some circumstances. Some of the lyrics are a bit too soft rock for me, for example in the song Take Care Of Yourself “check in with your mother when you can”… really?

What’s my conclusion? I have no freaking idea. But I know they’re not for me so at the very least I do know what button to press.

Presentation = 2/5
Content = No videos but a lot of songs. Two playlists worth in fact.
Music = 3/5
Friend Request = DENIED!

————————————————————————–
musical-jennischickJENNI SCHICK
www.myspace.com/jennischick

Ok, so here are the 10 things I’m going to assume/guess/make-up about Jenni from the little information that is presented here.

1) Jenni was known for singing in high school. In fact, she was probably one of the best singers in her school choir (which I also assume she was in).
2) Jenni has probably worn cowboy boots at least once in her life.
3) No-one has ever told Jenni that maybe music isn’t the career for her.
4) Jenni will most likely get upset if she reads this review.
5) I’m going to take a wild stab and say these songs were recorded in her music class or her shower.
6) She was in a long distance relationship.
7) She doesn’t know how to spell “apology”
8) She should really stick to singing classical music.
9) Jenni is probably tired of “schtick” jokes.
10) Jenni will not see me on her friends list.

Presentation = 0/5
Content = Not a lot. I don’t think she knows how to use MySpace too well.
Music = 1/5
Friend Request = DENIED!

————————————————————————–
musical-benpeelBEN PEEL
www.myspace.com/benpeel

Ben Peel is a young man from Bradford, England. He has played in quite a few bands apparently. Six are listed in his “about me” section. I’m always fascinated by the names people choose for their bands and my favourite one that Ben has been in is The Hot Crustacean Band – always a good thing.

The reason why I mention the fact that he is in other bands is because I think he is probably best utilised in a group.

Ben’s music is part-mod, part-Britpop. There is a clear influence from the likes of The Kinks and in equal measure a sound synonymous with bands such as James and The Las. At least, that’s what I’m hearing from it but I guess a lot of Britpop was inspired by the mod generation so it’s not surprising there is a lot of cross-over there. Either way, this sort of thing is right up my alley.

He shows a lot of promise. Simple messages mixed with catchy tunes and a real feeling of that “working class hero” ethos that English northerners have pumping through their veins from birth. Some good music is hampered for me by pretty rough vocals. If I heard Ben Peel singing in the night I would throw a bucket of water over him. This is where I go back to my original idea that Ben Peel might be better suited to being in a band. He’s a good song writer. Has some great concepts for a songs sound but god damn it he needs a better singer.

Which is a shame really because if the singing here was of a better quality, and not even a largely higher quality just a bit better, then I think I might have got much more excited by what I was listening to. Unfortunately my interest was fleeting. However, there are only three songs on parade here. With more I could be convinced otherwise.

I should pop back in after some time and see how Mr. Peel has progressed.

Presentation = 3/5
Content = Not a lot. But it’s early days, the page isn’t even up 6 months yet.
Music = 3/5
Friend Request = DENIED!

-If you dare to have your music ripped apart by a button clicking maniac then just send a friend request to Aaron at www.myspace.com/aaronhbp. As long as his laptop doesn’t decide to commit suicide again you’ll have your music reviewed, for better or worse.

TV Or Not TV: 2/1 – 2/7

Filed under: TV Or Not TV — Tags: — admin @ 1:33 am

tvornottv-header.png

Welcome to another edition of TV or Not TV where I love it when spin gets spun out of control.

I’ve not said a lot when it comes to the recent NBC Prime Time / Late Night debacle because this is really a matter of people that have made millions off of NBC who are getting bitten by the same network as it tries to recover from some really bad decisions. My silence, however, has to be broken when it comes down to the Jay Leno / Oprah interview from this last Thursday because this interview was almost as bad of an idea as the Jay Leno at 10 PM decision was.

First and foremost let me say that I think Jay Leno wasted his time with this interview and I think it was done far too soon after all of the NBC late night drama. Jay was hoping for some PR spin through this Oprah interview because he has been labeled as the bad guy. This perception, however, doesn’t matter in respect to him returning as the host of The Tonight Show. The people that used to watch The Tonight Show with Jay Leno will probably follow Jay back to The Tonight Show when he returns after the Winter Olympics because Middle America loves his non-confrontational and bland form of interviewing and entertainment. He’s their visual form of warm milk to take right before bed after they’ve watched their nightly news. This is the very reason that NBC wants to put him back into the Tonight Show driver seat.

So why did he think it was such a good idea to go on Oprah so soon after Conan’s last show? He has to know there’s no way he can reclaim the devout “I’m with CoCo” people so those people have to be written off. I’m sure those people are also just a small portion of the actual viewing audience of The Tonight Show with Conan O’Brien. I think that the real motivation is in the branding of “bad guy” that he’s been smacked with. This attitude is reflected in his interviewing style since he never asks the hard questions and always lobs up celebrity softball questions. Jay wants everyone to like him and wants us to think he’s just like us, just with a cooler job and a far better paycheck.

Prior to the Oprah interview I was willing to not exactly think of Jay as the bad guy, instead just being more of an accomplice. The bad guy in this scenario is actually NBC in having such an extreme reaction to their own bad decision to try to keep both Conan and Jay five years ago in a bid to avoid another David Letterman style defection to another network. The network also solidified it’s position as the bad guy for not really giving Conan a chance to grow in to The Tonight Show and have his audience build with him. Leno trailed Letterman in the ratings for almost three years before the Hugh Grant interview propelled him into a lead that the show held on to. Who knows what Conan would be doing a year from now?

When it comes to The Tonight Show ratings I’d also like to point out that ever since Conan took over the show everyone and their brother knew that Leno would be premiering at 10:00 PM. In a completely un-scientific fashion I can tell you that for every commercial I saw for Conan’s The Tonight Show I saw there were at least 10 teaser commercials for The Jay Leno Show. How much of the former The Tonight Show audience was not giving Conan a chance while waiting to see what the forthcoming Jay Leno Show had to offer? I think it is also fair to compare Conan’s ratings to before and after the premiere of The Jay Leno Show where his bad ratings caused a drop in NBC affiliate local 11:00 PM news, which also translates as a lead in for Conan’s The Tonight Show, doesn’t it?

Wait, didn’t Leno say something about affiliate complaints in his whine-fest during the Oprah interview? Yes he did, but the context he used it in was the following when asked if he thought by going back he was taking away Conan’s dream, “By going back to “The Tonight Show,” did he ever think that he was “taking away Conan’s dream?” “No. Because this is an affiliate decision. Affiliates felt that the ratings were low.” Now I’m now TV expert but this almost make Jay seem to be as well informed as Sara Palin regarding what paper she reads. The only thing I ever heard about affiliates complaints were that after The Jay Leno Show premiered the affiliates experienced up to a 49% drop in audience with their new lead in when compared to 10 PM dramas filled the time slot. Affiliates sell local ad time during their news with very little sold during 10 PM or after the 11:30 PM time slots. Don’t try and take a bit of information and twist it around to try to say that the affiliates were the driving force behind this. Oh, and Leno, what’s with this comment that Conan’s ratings were “destructive to the franchise”? Didn’t you just say in August of 2009 that you too were http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/11/jay-leno-defends-conans-r_n_256910.html beat up in the ratings early on in your The Tonight Show tenure? I guess your perspective is dictated by whatever the current corporate line is.

Five years ago Leno was a victim, that’s true. The executives of NBC told him that they were giving the show that he loved to Conan to keep him from getting away. I’m sure there were plenty of corporate yes men that also surrounded Jay with smoke and sunshine to make him believe that the 10:00 PM time slot would be the greatest TV innovation of all time. The truth of the matter though is that he had his run and he had his time. I’d have far more respect for him if he hadn’t agreed to the 11:35 time slot move just on the word of NBC that they were either “75% sure Conan would go for it” or that they would “talk to him tomorrow” (both of which he has said, which one is it though?). The moral thing to do would have been to wait to see how Conan would feel about this, but then again I’m talking about the guy who in conjunction with his former manager set up the situation to essentially force Johnny Carson out of The Tonight Show.

Don’t blow smoke up our ass Jay and make us think that you weren’t a part of this and don’t try to claim you were a victim. I think I speak for a lot of people when I say that we’re just not buying it. Your Oprah interview did only one thing for me, it re-enforced for me that you are looking out for #1 and that’s about as far as your interest goes.

OK, now that I’ve said my piece on this let’s move on to what else that our television viewing options are for the week.

MONDAY

TLC – 8:00 PM: Two hours of CAKE BOSS followed by an ULTIMATE CAKE OFF? Seriously TLC, I’m trying to lose weight here and you’re just an enabler!

LOGO – 9:00 PM: Putting Kathy Griffin into the mix as a guest judge on the second season premiere of RUPAUL’S DRAG RACE may have made this one a must watch for me this week.

ABC – 10:00 PM: After the last two episodes I can’t tell you just how disappointing it is to me that this week’s CASTLE is a repeat from earlier this season.

TUESDAY

NBC – 8:00 PM: The Peacock brings us the last hour of last week’s THE BIGGEST LOSER followed by this week’s two hour episode. What could they possibly be trying to counter-program against? Oh yeah…

ABC – 8:00 PM: LOST is back with a one-hour “get you all caught up on the past five years” of the show before the two hour season premiere at 9:00 PM. Yeah, I’ll be glued to my seat and confused as all hell by 11:00 PM.

FOX – 8:00 PM: VICTORIA BECKHAM is back tonight as a guest judge to creepily not emote very much in response to the contestants.

WEDNESDAY

NBC – 8:00 PM: The good about MERCY? James Van Der Beek joins the class (the DAWSON!) The bad? I haven’t watched MERCY yet so I have no idea what this means.

FOX – 8:00 PM: The good about HUMAN TARGET? Jackie Earle Haley. The bad? Just about everything else (accept Chi McBride as well).

ABC – 9:00 PM: The good about MODERN FAMILY? Minnie Driver guests (and everything else). The bad? That we have to wait another week for a new episode.

THURSDAY

CBS – 8:00 PM: How do you get everyone ready for the special SURVIVOR: HEROES VS. VILLAINS? Put together a clip show and call it SURVIVING SURVIVOR.

NBC – 9:00 PM: Kathy Bates guests as the CEO of the company that buys the parent company of THE OFFICE. How awesome would it be if she played the role as her role from MISERY?

COMEDY – 10:30 PM: THE SARAH SILVERMAN PROGRAM returns for it’s third season with Sarah growing a disturbingly thick mustache and her sister falsely telling her she was born with both sex organs. OK, I get it, I’m not supposed to watch this show sober at all am I?

FRIDAY

THE CW – 8:00 PM: Two hours of SMALLVILLE try to combat the Friday dull drums with special guest Pam Grier.

BBCA – 8:00 PM: My inner 13 year just giggles every time I see MY BIG BREASTS AND ME on the schedule.

SYFY – 9:00 PM: I have no idea what happens tonight on CAPRICA, but I’ll still be watching.

SATURDAY

AMC – 8:00 PM: If you’ve never seen SILVERADO than give this a chance instead of all of the other crud that is being offered tonight.

TBS – 9:00 PM: OK, SILVERADO too butch for you? How about MEAN GIRLS instead?

NBC – 11:30 PM: How do you follow-up an amazing appearance last week by JON HAMM on SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE? Completely underwhelm the audience with ASHTON KUTCHER is my guess right now.

SUNDAY

CBS – 6:30 PM E / 3:30 PM P: This year I’ll ask the same question I always do about THE SUPERBOWL: which commercial will be the one I think is the best?

ANIMAL PLANET – 6:00 PM E / 3:30 PM P: Yes, I know, based on my SUPERBOWL comment above you think I should just be watching the PUPPY BOWL.

ABC – 8:00 PM: From 8 to 10 a repeat of MODERN FAMILY tops each hour, followed up by two back-to-back episodes at 10 PM. If you haven’t seen this great show yet here’s your chance to pace yourself.

Will Wilkins will please stand by.  

« Newer Posts

Powered by WordPress