FRED Entertainment

March 14, 2007

DVD Late Show: My Cancer Year

Filed under: DVD Late Show — UncaScroogeMcD @ 1:38 am

dvdlateshow.jpg

March 14, 2007

So”¦ where have I been?

Regular readers of this column ““ if there are any left ““ may remember my frequent, if often cryptic, references to various health problems in previous installments. Well, those myriad illnesses and symptoms were but preamble ““ last autumn, I was diagnosed with a cancerous tumor in one of my kidneys.

Needless to say, the following weeks and months were kind of crazy as I consulted with a seemingly endless parade of doctors and made long road trips from my home in rural Maine to bustling Boston, where the surgery was eventually carried out. Finally, at the end of January, I had my right kidney removed.

Now, as excuses go, that’s one of my best. Whatever spare time I had before the surgery was spent trying to keep up with paying jobs, and the last month and a half since the surgery have been pure recuperation. It’s only in the last couple of weeks that I’ve felt up to extended stints at the keyboard.

During that enforced absence, though, I found I really missed writing this column. I’ve finally learned not to make too many promises regarding this particular enterprise, but I will make a renewed effort to knock out fresh reviews as frequently as possible. I enjoy watching these flicks and writing about these discs, and a few people have even told me they like reading my reviews.

Hope you enjoy them, too.

As I’m trying to make up for lost time, for the next several columns, I’ll be mixing brand new releases with somewhat older DVD titles (although even those are mostly from within the last few months), and running extra “Capsule Reviews” at the end of every column.

Now, let’s get back to the Late Show“¦ already in progress.

maniaccop.jpg

One of my favorite action/horror films ever, William Lustig’s MANIAC COP (1988), has finally received the quality DVD release it deserves, thanks to the fine folks at Synapse Films.

Previously issued on laserdisc by Elite Entertainment and as a fuzzy full-frame DVD by a budget label best left unnamed, this new release is not only the finest the film has ever looked on home video, but includes all the great extras from the laserdisc as well as a few new features created by Synapse specifically for this edition.

When a psycho killer in a police uniform starts murdering innocent people on the streets of New York, the city is gripped in paranoia and afraid of their own police force. Soon, a young cop named Jack Forrest (Bruce Campbell of EVIL DEAD and BUBBA HO-TEP fame) is wrongfully accused of being the “Maniac Cop” when his wife turns up dead and he’s arrested by his fellow officers. But while Jack may be an unfaithful jerk, he’s no serial killer, so it’s up to his policewoman mistress (Laurene Landon, HUNDRA, I THE JURY) and veteran NYPD detective Frank McCrae (the great Tom Atkins, NIGHT OF THE CREEPS, LETHAL WEAPON) to find the real Maniac Cop ““ a scarred, Frankenstein-esque hulk named Matt Cordell (the imposing Robert Z’Dar of SOULTAKER) ““ stop him, and clear Jack’s name.

A great B-movie cast (which also includes William Smith, Richard Roundtree, Sheree North and Sam Raimi!), slick, noir-ish photography, a nearly perfect script by exploitation vet Larry Cohen (IT’S ALIVE, Q, BLACK CAESAR, ORIGINAL GANGSTAS), an evocative score by Jay Chattaway, and gritty direction by William Lustig (VIGILANTE, MANIAC) combine to create a top-notch, fast-paced entertainment, with plenty of thrills, impressive stunts and some genuine scares.

Synapse’s DVD presents MANIAC COP in a brand-new, high definition, 1.85:1 widescreen anamorphic transfer from the original vault materials. The movie looks amazing, with a level of clarity and detail unseen in previous video incarnations. The film has also been given a new DTS 6.1 surround audio mix as well as a crystal Dolby Digital 5.1 version.

There are plenty of extras, including a highly entertaining group commentary (ported over from the LD) with director Lustig, writer Cohen, star Campbell and composer Chattaway. There are several theatrical trailers and TV spots, a still gallery, a bunch of short scenes shot to pad out the running time for Japanese television (featuring Leo Rossi of Lustig’s RELENTLESS), and a new-to-this-DVD on-camera interview with Robert Z’Dar.

As you may have gathered, I’ve been a fan of this movie (and its first sequel) for years, and I’m absolutely thrilled to have this new edition for my DVD library. As I mentioned before, despite its long history on video, it has never looked or sounded as good as it does on this new DVD. Synapse is to be commended for putting in the effort to present this cult favorite in such a high quality package. Strongly recommended.

jocks.jpg

BCI Eclipse has acquired the old Crown International exploitation film library, and has been making good use of these classic drive-in crowd pleasers. Crown was around from the Sixties through the Eighties, and their prodigious output covered the gamut from horror films to action flicks to teen comedies ““ any genre that could be produced cheaply and profitably appeal to a young audience.

JOCKS (1986) is one such Crown “classic” from BCI, a college sports and sex comedy with a decidedly unusual supporting cast for the genre.

Directed by exploitation veteran Steve Carver (LONE WOLF MCQUADE, BIG BAD MAMA), JOCKS’s performers include a very young Mariska Hargitay (LAW & ORDER SPECIAL VICTIMS UNIT), Tom Shadyac (who later directed the Jim Carrey vehicles LIAR, LIAR and BRUCE ALMIGHTY) and B-movie stalwarts Richard Roundtree (SHAFT) and Christopher Lee (HORROR OF DRACULA, THE DEVIL RIDES OUT).

The story follows a small college tennis (!) team made up of misfit players (including Donald Gibb, REVENGE OF THE NERDS, BLOODSPORT) who travel to Vegas for a tournament, unaware that if they fail to win the championship, their dean (Lee) will shut down the tennis program. Of course, the boys are more interested in partying in the pre-Disneyfied Sin City than playing tennis, and their coach (Roundtree) finds it nearly impossible to ride herd on them. Will they win the tournament and save their team? More importantly, will they get laid?

What, haven’t you seen one of these flicks before?

Despite the racy cover art, the film is relatively tame sexually, with only a little bit of female nudity (not Hargitay, unfortunately) and lots of innuendo. While JOCKS is utterly predictable, the cast is appealing, the pace is good, and the movie is fairly entertaining, if not particularly memorable; the kind of movie that used to endlessly run on Cinemax in the wee hours.

BCI’s DVD is quite nice. It’s a bare-bones package, but the 20-year old movie is given a solid, sharp 1.78:1 anamorphic widescreen transfer that belies its age and low budget. The film looks damned good. The disc also includes trailers for four other Crown teen comedies of the era, THE BEACH GIRLS, WEEKEND PASS and the popular cable programmers TOMBOY and MY CHAUFFEUR ““ all of which will (hopefully) soon be on DVD from BCI, if they’re not already.

If you happen to remember this movie or just have a fondness for teen comedies of the era, JOCKS is an inexpensive, nicely packaged trip back to the Eighties.

grandtheftauto.jpg

Disney/Buena Vista has really dropped the ball when it comes to their handling of the Roger Corman film library. They acquired the movies last year with some industry fanfare, assuring Corman and his fans that the company was uniquely positioned to handle the DVDs better than any other studio. Well, a year later, the releases have slowed to a trickle, they continue to offer the titles in an unmatted, full-frame format, and seem determined to give each title the ugliest, most misleading cover art imaginable.

Case in point: Ron Howard’s 1977 directorial debut, the light-hearted car crash comedy GRAND THEFT AUTO, which has been packaged as a FAST AND THE FURIOUS clone and labeled as a “Tricked Out Edition.” Sigh.

In 1976, actor Ron Howard, who was then starring in the hit sitcom HAPPY DAYS, played the lead in a low-budget, rural car chase movie for Roger Corman entitled EAT MY DUST. The movie was hugely successful on the drive-in circuit, and Corman wanted an immediate follow-up in the same vein. Howard was agreeable ““ but only if Corman allowed him to direct the movie as well. Corman agreed. Immediately, Ron and his father, veteran character actor Rance Howard, began to put together the script for a fast-paced, funny car chase flick they called GRAND THEFT AUTO.

Here’s the plot: young Sam (Howard) and Paula (Nancy Morgan) are madly in love and want to get married. Unfortunately, Paula’s wealthy parents object ““ they intend for her to marry rich, spoiled Bigby Powers (Barry Cahill) instead. Paula’s the headstrong type though, and after storming out of her parents’ house, she and Sam steal the family’s Rolls Royce and head for Las Vegas to elope. Paula’s father puts a $25,000 bounty on his daughter, and soon the two young lovers find themselves chased by a motley assortment of pursuers ““ including amateur bounty hunters, inept private eyes, various cops, an ambitious radio DJ in a helicopter, and Paula’s spurned fiancé.

Of course the plot is just there to link the car stunts together, and it works marvelously. In fact, it’s great fun, with plenty of well-staged car crashes, comedic appearances by Ron’s whole family (or, at least, father Rance and brother Clint) and HAPPY DAYS mom Marion Ross, and even a little bit of pointed media satire.

The Buena Vista DVD presents the film in an unmatted, non-anamorphic full-frame 1.33:1 transfer that makes a mockery of Gary Graver’s fine cinematography, leaving far too much image information on the top and bottom of the screen. Picture quality is good, but there’s a bit of dirt and debris that probably could have been digitally cleaned up, if anyone had cared enough to do so. The audio’s been given a decent 5.1 Dolby Digital remix, and it sounds fine.

As for the “Tricked Out” extras, there’s a documentary called “A Family Affair” which is essentially an on-camera interview with Rance Howard and son Clint. Director/star Ron, however, is mysteriously and disappointingly absent. There’s a short introduction to the film by Roger Corman, and the amusing original theatrical trailer.

The best extra, though, is the audio commentary by Corman and Ron Howard, who clearly has fond and vivid memories of his directorial debut. Corman doesn’t contribute a whole lot to the discussion, but the two clearly are enjoying hanging out and watching the movie again, and they’re obviously proud of the film.

And they should be. It’s unassuming, funny, and damned entertaining. I recommend picking it up, even with Disney’s stupid packaging and substandard transfer.

godzillaraids.jpg

Originally announced for last November, Classic Media has finally released their first follow-ups to last year’s near-definitive DVD presentation of the original Godzilla film, GOJIRA.

GODZILLA RAIDS AGAIN (GOJIRA NO GYAKUSHÛ, 1955) is not only the first Godzilla sequel from Japan’s Toho Studios, but it, much more so than its predecessor, firmly establishes the formula and feel of the long-running and popular kaiju eiga (“monster movie”) series.

Tsukioka, a spotter for a Japanese fishing fleet, is forced to land his plane on a small, uninhabited island. When his fellow pilot, Kobayashi, shows up to rescue him, they witness two giant monsters engaged in mortal combat nearby. Before long, the Japanese authorities realize that a monster closely resembling the first Godzilla (which was definitively killed in the first film) is on the rampage, along with a new creature they call Angurius. Eventually, the two monsters make landfall in Osaka where they resume fighting, and the military once again finds itself helpless before the destructive might of the prehistoric titans.

Directed by Motoyoshi Oda as a quickie follow-up to the surprisingly popular and profitable original, GODZILLA RAIDS AGAIN is nonetheless a nifty little monster movie in its own right, and a decent sequel. The tone is somewhat less Apocalyptic than GOJIRA, released just one year before, although not quite as light as later entries would become. It’s also the first in the series to pit the Big G against another monster ““ in this case Angurius (a/k/a Angillas), a mutated ankylosaur. The human characters ““ mostly employees of a large fishing collective ““ are normal, working-class civilians instead of the military professionals and educated scientists of the first film (and most American giant monster flicks of the era), a trend that would continue in subsequent features.

Classic Media’s DVD is another excellent presentation, featuring both the original Japanese version of the film, and the U.S. English-dubbed and edited version (originally released as GIGANTIS THE FIRE MONSTER, although this print does not bear that title, at Toho’s insistance). The two versions look very good for their age ““ although both sport some age-related specks, scratches and other minor damage ““ and are presented in their original 1.33:1 full frame aspect ratios. The U.S. version includes a commentary track by Godzilla expert Steve Ryfle, and there’s an informative featurette on “Suit Acting,” along with a slide show of rare stills and advertising art.

For Godzilla and kaiju fans, this disc is essential. Casual viewers might find it a bit slow and technically primitive, but as far as I’m concerned, they should check it out anyway.

mothravsgodzilla.jpg

The same can be said of Classic Media’s presentation of MOTHRA VS. GODZILLA (MOSURA TAI GOJIRA, 1964), directed by original Big G director Ishiro Honda. MVG is probably the best Godzilla film of Sixties, a bright, colorful fantasy with powerful, striking imagery, and some of the series’ most memorable scenes and characters.

When a typhoon leaves a giant egg washed up near a small coastal village, enterprising entrepreneurs buy it from the villagers and make plans to build a theme park around it. Soon, two small, fairy-like women appear, and beg the greedy businessmen to return the egg to its parent, Mothra, the giant moth god of Infant Island. If the egg is not returned, they warn, there’s gonna be trouble. Of course, they are rebuffed and their warning ignored. Meanwhile, Godzilla reawakens from a coma and digs his way out of the ground where King Kong had left him buried in the previous film, and sets out for the the freedom of the sea ““ and coincidentally(?) making a beeline toward Mothra’s egg. Let the rumble begin!

Like the other new Classic Media Godzilla discs, MOTHRA VS. GODZILLA includes both the original Japanese version as well as the American version, originally released in the U.S by American-International Pictures under the title GODZILLA VS. THE THING.

While both transfers are very sharp and vivid, the U.S. version is presented in an incorrect aspect ratio. Instead of the “Tohoscope” 2.35:1 ratio, the best and most complete print of GODZILLA VS. THE THING that Classic Media could get their hands on had been cropped to 1.85:1 dimensions, losing a bit of picture information on both sides of the screen. Personally, I can live with it ““ I’m probably only going to be watching the Japanese version from now on anyway ““ but I can understand why some fans, especially those who grew up with the AIP version, might be unhappy.

Extras include a commentary by kaiju experts Ed Godziszewski and Steve Ryfle, an animated still gallery/slideshow, the original theatrical trailer, and a biography of musical composer Akira Ifukube.

Despite the aspect ratio problem on GODZILLA VS. THE THING, I still have to recommend this disc to fans of the Big G and the giant monster genre. It’s the best presentation of the film available domestically and the first time the Japanese version’s been released on U.S. home video.

spaceacademy.jpg

Another favorite Saturday Morning television program from my childhood, Filmation Studio’s live-action SPACE ACADEMY ““ THE COMPLETE SERIES (1977) has made its way to DVD due to the fine folks at BCI Eclipse.

Set in the “Star Year” 3732, the short-lived series (it mutated into JASON OF STAR COMMAND a year later) chronicled the adventures of a group of young space cadets lead by handsome Chris Gentry (Ric Carrot, THE SWINGING CHEERLEADERS) and his telepathic sister Laura, (popular 60’s and 70’s child actress Pamelyn Ferdin). Other cadets include Brian Tochi, Ty Henderson, Eric Greene and the incredibly hot Maggie Cooper (AN EYE FOR AN EYE). Under the tutelage of their teacher, Commander Isaac Gampu (Jonathan Harris of LOST IN SPACE), the earnest young cadets learned important lessons about honor, duty and life while exploring the galaxy and unraveling the mysteries of the universe.

Shot on a very low budget, SPACE ACADEMY is surprisingly well crafted, with good production values, set and costumes, not to mention high-quality, pre-CGI special effects that rival those produced for other 70’s sci-fi projects, including the vastly more expensive SPACE: 1999. Nowadays, it’s common to call such handcrafted, painstaking miniature work “cheesy,” especially when compared to today’s hi-tech, computer-created effects, but that’s just insulting, ignorant and inaccurate. SPACE ACADEMY boasts damned fine effects work and it adds immeasurably to the show’s charm. In fact, effects supervisor Chuck Comisky went on to supervise the effects on Roger Corman’s BATTLE BEYOND THE STARS, and some of his crewmembers worked on STAR WARS and its sequels.

Scripts are a mixed bag ““ ranging from some thought-provoking sci-fi and effective character studies to childish kid’s space adventures, but the cast is likeable and every half-hour episode is entertaining, each delivering the obligatory moral just before the end credits.

BCI/Eclipse’s DVD set includes all 15 episodes of the single season on 4 discs. The full frame transfers look very good for their age. Not pristine, but much better than the ARK II episodes that BCI released on DVD last year. Like their previous Filmation sets, BCI has included plenty of nostalgic bonus features, including a half-hour documentary/cast reunion and two episode commentary tracks with producer Lou Scheimer, cast members Carrot, Tochi and Greene, and effects supervisor Comisky. There’s an extensive still gallery, all the episode scripts on DVD-ROM, commercial bumpers and more.

The only disappointment in this fine DVD set is that neither Pamelyn Ferdin (Laura) nor Maggie Cooper (Adrian) were involved in the reunion/documentary. It’s a shame, because Ferdin was one of the most prolific and familiar child actresses of the era and probably has some great stories, while Maggie Cooper was… well, a babe.

For anyone who bought the company’s previous ARK II release, this would make a great companion set (and not just because frugal Filmation recycled the fiberglass nose section of the Ark for the “Seeker” spaceship!). Highly recommended for fans of 70’s sci-fi television, and aging genre buffs like me.

ReevesDouble.jpg

No doubt expecting resurgence in interest about the late George Reeves after the release of the big-budget docudrama/murder mystery, HOLLYWOODLAND, VCI has recently issued two of the SUPERMAN television star’s 50’s B-movies together on a new disc. The resulting DVD, THE GEORGE REEVES DOUBLE FEATURE ““ THUNDER IN THE PINES/JUNGLE GODDESS (both 1948), is an entertaining if old-fashioned double bill, featuring the charismatic actor in a couple of decent low budget adventures.

In THUNDER IN THE PINES, George is a lumberjack, who is roped by Lyle Talbot (GLEN OR GLENDA, MESA OF LOST WOMEN) into a logging competition with his best friend (original DICK TRACY serial star Ralph Byrd) for both the love of a sultry French tart (Denise Darcel) and a lucrative lumber contract.

Presented in full-frame sepia tone, this Robert Edwards-directed, hour-long programmer is an amusing time-killer that benefits greatly from the good old boy chemistry between the male leads, plenty of logging stock footage, and a playful script full of good-natured humor.

The companion feature, JUNGLE GODDESS, once again teams Reeves and Byrd, this time as African adventurers who set out into the wilderness in search of a missing heiress. Of course, when they find the beautiful blonde (Wanda McKay), they discover that she’s become the “white goddess” of a hostile native tribe, and getting her back to civilization won’t be easy.

Clocking in at just over an hour, JUNGLE GODDESS is less fun than PINES, but fortunately too short to get really boring. Director Lewis D. Collins, who specialized in B-westerns, wrings what interest he can out of the simplistic script and cheap “jungle” sets, while Reeves and Byrd attempt to bring a little depth to their stock characters.

VCI presents both films, which are making their home video debuts, in decent full-frame transfers that show only minimal wear and age-related damage. The mono sound is clear and balanced. The disc is loaded with Reeves-centric extra features, including a multi-part documentary, a photo gallery, well-written bios, several text essays and more.

While neither film on this disc is a classic, they’re short, fun B-flicks that allow Reeves to ably demonstrate the charm and charisma that made him so memorable as TV’s Superman. For comic book fans, there’s also the added entertainment value of seeing “Superman” and “Dick Tracy” together on screen.

Recommended for Reeves fans and old movie buffs.

hellboysword.jpg

I’ve been a fan of Mike Mignola’s Hellboy character since his first comic book appearance a decade or so ago. It’s been gratifying to see the character’s success over the years in both print and other media. I enjoyed Guillermo Del Toro’s live-action feature film, and looked forward with great anticipation to the direct-to-DVD/cable feature, HELLBOY ANIMATED: THE SWORD OF STORMS (2006).

Fortunately, I was not disappointed.

SWORD OF STORMS sends Hellboy (voiced by Ron Perlman, reprising his movie role) and his fellow BPRD (Bureau of Paranormal Research and Defense) agents ““ pyrokinetic Liz (Selma Blair) and fishman Abe Sapien (Doug Jones) ““ to the Orient, where they must face off against demons of Thunder & Lightning, a dragon, and a bunch of cannibalistic floating heads. The story incorporates elements from a number of Mignola’s stories, and successfully captures the tone and feel of the original comics (and live-action film).

The animation is quite nice ““ maybe not Disney quality, but very good for a direct-to-disc production. The character designs may not be 100% faithful to Mignola’s comic book drawings, but they are attractive and well conceived. The voice work ““ by most of the first film’s cast ““ is top notch across the board. Overall, it’s a very respectable effort by director Tad Stones and his crew, and I can’t wait for the already in-production sequel.

Anchor Bay presents SWORD OF STORMS in a crystal-sharp 1.78:1 anamorphic widescreen transfer, augmented by a vibrant Dolby 5.1 sound track. The disc is heavily loaded with a half-dozen slick featurettes covering all aspects of the production, and a commentary track by creator Mignola, director Stone and co-director Phil Weinstein. There are even teaser trailers for the sequel film and a forthcoming Hellboy video game.

Personally, I loved it, and can’t wait for the sequel. Highly recommended for fans of the character and animation buffs in general.

voodoomoon.jpg

VOODOO MOON (2005) is one of several recent horror movie releases from Anchor Bay and director Kevin VanHook (THE FALLEN ONES). I really hope the others are better.

Filled with familiar genre personalities such as Eric Mabius (THE CROW: SALVATION, RESIDENT EVIL), Charisma Carpenter (TV’s BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER and ANGEL), Jeffrey Combs (RE-ANIMATOR, THE FRIGHTENERS), Dee Wallace (THE HOWLING, THE FRIGHTENERS) and John Amos (BEASTMASTER), the inexplicably titled VOODOO MOON has a decidedly comic book plot (fitting, as director Van Hook is a former comic book writer and artist), some slick special effects, and an unfortunately sluggish pace.

Twenty years before the film’s story begins, two siblings (Mabius and Carpenter) survived a demonic massacre in their Southern hometown. Now, the brother, Cole ““ who has apparently become something of an occult super-hero in the intervening years ““ has returned to recruit his sister (who is prone to prophetic, plot-vital visions) for a final confrontation with the demon responsible for the deaths of their family and neighbors. Joining them are several other folks, all people that Cole has helped fight evil over the years, including an outlaw biker (Amos), a traumatized cop (Combs) and a neurotic healer (Wallace).

The creakily familiar storyline might have worked in more capable hands, but damn, is VOODOO MOON talky! I fell asleep repeatedly during the running time, and when I tried watching the second half again for this review, I dozed off again. I guess this played on the Sci-Fi Channel, and maybe with lots of long commercial breaks the slow pacing wouldn’t seem quite so noticeable, but still”¦

It doesn’t help that the villain, when we finally meet him, isn’t particularly intimidating, nor that “voodoo” has almost nothing whatsoever to do with the plot of a film called VOODOO MOON.

The DVD from Anchor Bay is up to its usual high technical standards, with a virtually perfect 1.78:1 anamorphic widescreen transfer and crisp Dolby 5.1 sound. There are two “making of” documentaries that are somewhat more involving than the feature, deleted scenes, a still gallery, and trailers for this and other Anchor Bay horror titles.

Ultimately, a good cast and slick computer effects can’t make up for a weak script and uninspired direction. Here’s hoping that the other VanHook titles on my desk (SLAYER and DEATH ROW) are better.

thatmanbolt.jpg

When I was in high school, the A-V department used to get these thick, phone book-sized catalogs for 16mm rental films. Along with the expected “educational” variety of cinema, there were hundreds of entertainment features included; many of the listings illustrated with the original newspaper ad slicks. Since the school usually discarded these catalogs, I snagged them whenever I could. For an embryonic film buff in the pre-video era, these catalogs were far more educational and exhaustive than most available reference books, listing movies across the broad spectrum of cinema ““ everything from foreign art house fare to Hollywood “classics” to the most obscure drive-in programmers. It was in one of these catalogs that I first saw the listing for THAT MAN BOLT, and became obsessed with seeing it.

It only took me nearly thirty years…!

THAT MAN BOLT (1973) begins with international freelance courier Jefferson Bolt (Fred “The Hammer” Williamson, HELL UP IN HARLEM, BUCKTOWN, THREE THE HARD WAY) practicing martial arts in a Macao prison cell. Soon, he’s visited by a “government” operative (the nation involved is never named, but the agent certainly appears to be British), who offers him a job carrying a cool million in American currency from Hong Kong to Mexico City, via Los Angeles.

The suave, well-dressed Bolt never makes it to Mexico, though, as he’s waylaid in L.A. by mobsters that seem intent on snagging his briefcase full of cash. Soon, neither Bolt nor the audience is sure whether the money is real or counterfeit (and you know, I’m still not quite sure how it turned out), people are dying left and right, and Bolt’s on his way back to the orient for a kung fu confrontation in Hong Kong.

I love this movie. Can’t even begin to figure out the story, but I love the movie anyway. Fred Williamson’s always been my favorite Blaxploitation lead, and Jefferson Bolt is clearly his attempt at creating a more general-audience, mass-market hero along the lines of James Bond. Bolt is a former captain of U.S. Special Forces, graduate of Cal Tech and MIT with a master’s degree in physics, and a black belt in karate. He wears expensive suits, has several cool apartments around the world, uses telescopic sunglasses, and possesses an upscale persona right out of the Ian Fleming playbook. Even the sex scenes are handled tastefully off-screen, as in the early Bond films.

The pacing is fast, the Hong Kong photography is beautiful, the funky score is great, and the unbeatable combination of Williamson’s sideburns, Alpha male machismo and cigar-chewing charisma carry the film, even as the plot continues to deteriorate with each additional minute of running time.

THAT MAN BOLT is available on a “Soul Showcase” DVD from Universal, which presents the film in a beautiful, crisp 1.85:1 anamorphic widescreen transfer with clear, Dolby Stereo sound. There are no extras included.

A great Saturday afternoon time-killer and a must-see for fans of “The Hammer.”

 

 

CAPSULE REVIEWS!

In another attempt to catch up with the mountain of notable discs that piled up during my hiatus, I’m incorporating my own new “Bonus Feature” into DVD Late Show ““ “Capsule Reviews” ““ super short and to the point! To begin, here’s a half-dozen DVDs that are long overdue for some Late Show attention:

grooviegoolies.jpg

GROOVIE GOOLIES “SATURDAY MOURNING COLLECTION” (1970-71). Another fine Filmation TV cartoon series set from BCI/Eclipse’s Ink & PAINT label, GOOLIES includes all 16 episodes of this amusingly macabre LAUGH-IN-inspired animated sketch comedy on 3 discs, and they look fantastic. If you can shut off or suppress your adult cynicism, your inner 10-year-old will love each pun laden, bubblegum pop song filled installment! Loaded with entertaining extras, including 2 episode commentaries, image galleries, liner notes, sing alongs, a strange 45-minute docu-comedy by fans of the show, and a candid interview with Filmation head honcho Lou Scheimer, GROOVIE GOOLIES is a trick and a treat any time of year for nostalgic monster movie fans!

rockfordfiles03.jpg

THE ROCKFORD FILES: SEASON THREE (1976-77). The third season of television’s finest private eye series comes to DVD in a no-frills, but well-produced 5-disc set from Universal. In this season, the writing took on a slightly sharper edge, and the show found a perfect balance of dry humor, action, and characterization, with series star James Garner at the peak of his skills. I don’t think there’s a clunker in the bunch. The DVD set includes all 22 episodes in remarkably well preserved 1.33 full frame transfers, and includes a bonus episode from the fourth season. Highly recommended.

arabiannights.jpg

ARABIAN NIGHTS (1942). This Technicolor desert swashbuckler finally hits home video courtesy of Universal’s Cinema Classics label, and while one might hope for some more extras, one can’t argue with the quality of the film. Inspired by the classic Arabian Nights legends, this big-budget epic features Jon Hall as a heroic prince, lovely Maria Montez as the legendary Schereazade, and THE THIEF OF BAGHDAD’s acrobatic Sabu in a fast, funny and romantic tale of high adventure. The disc features a lush, 1.33:1 full-frame transfer, an introduction by Turner Classic Movies host Robert Osborne, and the original theatrical trailer. Recommended.

lostcityjungle.jpg

LOST CITY OF THE JUNGLE (1946). This fun thirteen-chapter serial stars Rod Stanton and Keye Luke (KUNG FU) as agents of the “United Peace Foundation,” who oppose the sinister plans of legendary screen villain Lionel Atwill (in his last role) as he searches for a deadly radioactive element in the remote Asian nation of Pendrang. Briskly directed by Universal vets Ray Taylor and Lewis D. Collins, LOST CITY OF THE JUNGLE employs more than its share of carefully-chosen stock footage and tricky editing to flesh out its four hour plus running time. VCI crams all 13 chapters onto a single disc, and although the source material is somewhat scratched and battered, considering the film’s age and rarity, it’s more than watchable, with no obvious compression artifacts or other digital blemishes. One of the more obscure 40’s cliffhangers, VCI’s disc should be a welcome addition to any serial fan’s library ““ just don’t expect a pristine presentation.

ninedeaths.jpg

MAXIMUM ACTION: 9 DEATHS OF THE NINJA/KILLPOINT (1985/1984). Thanks to BCI/Eclipse, these two craptastic action flicks from the Crown International vaults are now available in one, handy, two-disc double feature set. In 9 DEATHS, Sho Kosugi (REVENGE OF THE NINJA) and Brent Huff (PERILS OF GWENDOLINE) battle a wheelchair-bound Nazi, his Amazon henchwoman, some midgets, and random evil ninjas in the Philippine jungle. In KILLPOINT, aging kung fu cop Leo Fong (ENFORCER FROM DEATH ROW) and FBI agent Richard Roundtree (SHAFT), are after a deranged Cameron Mitchell (SPACE MUTINY), who’s stolen a bunch of weapons from a National Guard armory and gone on a crime spree. 9 DEATHS, the more fun ““ if ludicrous ““ of the two flicks, is presented in a nice, but non-anamorphic 1.85:1 widescreen transfer, while the dreary KILLPOINT is given a sharp, anamorphic 1.78:1 presentation. The discs include trailers for other Crown action “classics.” These flicks are bad ““ even by my usually undemanding standards, and are recommended only for Kosugi (or Fong?) completists.

backlash.jpg

BACKLASH (2006). Stuntwoman Danielle Burgio turns action star as secret agent Skye Gold, in this somewhat incoherent but action-packed espionage thriller. On vacation in Trinidad, the pretty CIA agent finds herself marked for death by professional assassins and spends the rest of the movie running around the tropical island trying not to get killed. Fast paced and utterly brainless, this MTI direct-to-video B movie is still fun to watch, with some great fight scenes, nice photography and an attractive lead. There’s some really atrocious CGI effects in here, too, though (apparently the production couldn’t afford to rent helicopters) so be forewarned. Presented in anamorphic widescreen, the disc includes a couple of fluffy featurettes, a music video, bios, and trailers for other MTI action releases (all of which appear to have the same cast). Undemanding fun, and maybe worth a rental.

Thanks for joining me today. Some of the titles I intend to cover in upcoming columns are: CHAINSAW SALLY, SLAYER, EMMANUELLE 2: THE JOYS OF A WOMAN, ONCE UPON A GIRL, CITY OF ROTT, HUNK, THE POM POM GIRLS, THE VAN, THE WICKER MAN, THE BRIDE AND THE BEAST, LAURA’S TOYS, RAPTOR ISLAND, THE CISCO KID COLLECTION, PUMPKINHEAD: ASHES TO ASHES, ALTERED, KILL BABY KILL, JET LI’S FEARLESS, CASINO ROYALE, Disney’s PETER PAN, more MR. MOTOs, a bunch of new super-hero flicks from the mind of Stan Lee”¦ and more!

I hope you’ll join me.

For older Late Show columns (hey, the reviews are still good!), visit the DVD Late Show archive, and for my other pop culture musings, DVD previews and shameless self-promotion, you might enjoy checking out my blog.

Comments, DVD questions, review requests and offers of money can be sent to: dvdlateshow@atomicpulp.com

QSE News: 3/14/2007

Filed under: Columns,News — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:47 am
quickstopnews.jpg
line1.gif

Here are today’s top entertainment headlines:

  • qsnews.jpg
  • Entertainment giant Viacom, parent company to MTV and Comedy Central among others, is suing YouTube for $1 billion in damages for allowing its users to post Viacom copyrighted material on its website. Viacom CEO Philippe P. Dauman made the demands from his secret headquarters located on the moon.
  • The original lineup of REM reunited for the band’s induction into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame while only two former members of Van Halen showed up for the event. Former singer and former bass player Sammy Hagar and Michael Anthony, respectively, attended the ceremony despite being kicked out of the band. Eddie said later that he had intended on making the ceremony but his medical alert bracelet wasn’t working.
  • Sylvester Stallone is in trouble for trying to import illegal substances into Australia. Stallone and his crew were stopped in the Sydney airport under suspicion of possessing a banned human growth hormone. Stallone maintains that he needed the hormone to prepare himself for an upcoming fight with “a gigantic Russian guy.”
  • Hoping to capitalize on the success of religious movies like The Passion of the Christ, Hyde Park Entertainment has announced that they will produce a film about the first Easter.  The movie, which is slated to begin filming shortly, will stick closely to the story in the Bible except for the part where Jesus rises from the dead only to discover that he has 24 hours to stop a giant bunny who’s hiding explosive eggs around Los Angeles.
line1.gif

That’s all for today’s news, stay tuned to this channel for all the news that matters least but you still care about.

(Compiled by J. Allen)

##

March 13, 2007

Quick Stop Thingamabobs: 3/14/2007

Filed under: Columns,Thingamabobs — UncaScroogeMcD @ 11:59 pm
thingamabobs.jpg

The web. It’s a big place, full of plenty of distractions ““ some funny, some informative, some ludicrous, some disturbing, some inane, some profound. Each and every weekday, we present links to a few of our favorite finds”¦

————————————————

  • Tracy Morgan, you are my favorite crazy-ass Jedi mofo.. (Thingamabob)
  • The honest-to-goodnes Russian adaptation of Winnie the Pooh… (Thingamabob)
  • Oh, you can’t have enough Tracy… Here he is on SNL with his 30 Rock co-stars Alec Baldwin and Tina Fey… (Thingamabob)
  • Fozzie & Rowlf, back in the good ol’ days… (Thingamabob)
  • And finally, a recipe for choclate moose… (Thingamabob)

Have a THINGAMABOB? Send it in!

##

March 12, 2007

QSE News: 3/13/2007

Filed under: Columns,News — UncaScroogeMcD @ 11:59 pm
quickstopnews.jpg
line1.gif

Here are today’s top entertainment headlines:

  • qsnews.jpg
  • Rapper Snoop Dogg was held by police in Sweden for suspicion of illegal drug use. Dogg was in Sweden to attend a party where organizers hoped to get all attendees high simply by standing in the vicinity of Dogg.
  • The band Snow Patrol will have its song “Signal Fire” appear in the upcoming Spider-Man 3 film. The song was chosen after Director Sam Raimi realized that Limp Bizkit is no longer available to record new material for the film.
  • In a sad bit of news, classic rocker Brad Delp was found dead in his home on Friday.  It appears that the rocker, who was in the band Boston, had “More Than A Feeling” in his chest and took a “Long Time” to call 911.
  • Comedian Richard Jeni is dead after an apparent suicide.  Jeni’s girlfriend found the comedian/actor gravely wounded with a gunshot wound to the face. So, if you were never a fan, skipped his numerous appearances on The Tonight Show, avoided his award-winning and highly acclaimed televised stand up routines or simply dismissed him as unfunny… we hope you’re happy now.
  • The Beau Monde center, a luxury rehab clinic in Los Angeles, is suing troubled singer Courtney Love for failure to pay her rehab bill.  Officials close to Love insist that the matter is being taken care of and the whole thing was just a big misunderstanding.  According to sources, Love was too strung out on coke to realize that she needed to pay the bill for her successful rehab.
line1.gif

That’s all for today’s news, stay tuned to this channel for all the news that matters least but you still care about.

(Compiled by J. Allen)

##

Quick Stop Thingamabobs: 3/13/2007

Filed under: Columns,Thingamabobs — UncaScroogeMcD @ 11:52 pm
thingamabobs.jpg

The web. It’s a big place, full of plenty of distractions ““ some funny, some informative, some ludicrous, some disturbing, some inane, some profound. Each and every weekday, we present links to a few of our favorite finds”¦

————————————————

  • Today, let’s check out a few classic Drew Carey Show musical numbers – starting with their take on The Ventures’ “Five O’Clock World”… (Thingamabob)
  • And their take on How To Succeed In Business Without Really Trying‘s “Brotherhood of Man”… (Thingamabob)
  • “The Time Warp” vs. “Shake Your Groove Thing”… (Thingamabob)
  • And let’s wrap things up with the great Chuck McCann as Sonny – who’s cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs… (Thingamabob)

Have a THINGAMABOB? Send it in!

##

SModcast 5

Filed under: SModcast — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:27 pm

newhead2.jpg

SModcast is the meandering palaver of a pair of dudes whose voices are so dull, they don’t deserve to be on the radio (and, hence, aren’t). Kevin Smith and Scott Mosier are SModcast.

The best thing about SModcast? It don’t cost nothing.

line.gif

SModcast 5: Nipples You Can Hang a Coat On –

In which our heroes talk poker and casino etiquette, analyze Mos’s frugality and greener instrincts as well as his corn-oil burnin’ car, chat about their missed moment of Oscar glory, muse about the danger of mouth-breathers at a comic book convention, come clean with tales of unsolicited homoerotic escapades from their youth, and refuse to shower in gym.

[CONTENT WARNING] SModcast features harsh language and even harsher notions of propriety. Listener discretion is advised.

DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
SModcast 5 (MP3 format) – 58.47 MB

[display_podcast]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes
Subscribe to this Podcast via FeedBurner

Wanna add your two cents? Spend it here, in the SModcast mailbag.

line.gif

CLICK HERE FOR THE SMODCAST ARCHIVES

line.gif

##

Interview: Louis Theroux

Filed under: Interviews — UncaScroogeMcD @ 5:20 am

vaultinterviews.png

by Ken Plume

theroux-01.jpgLong before Comedy Central’s The Daily Show was a glimmer in creator Lizz Winstead’s eye, there was another program that brilliantly satirized programs like 60 Minutes and 20/20 – it was Michael Moore’s TV Nation. One of the TV Nation correspondents was a Brit by the name of Louis Theroux, whose segments included memorable visits with the “new” Klu Klux Klan and NRA rocker Ted Nugent.

In fact, it was exactly those profiles of subculture and celebrity that Theroux would explore with his post-TV Nation series Louis Theroux’s Weird Weekends, which originally aired on Bravo in the US and the BBC in the UK. In it, Louis traveled around America, seeking out and trying to make sense of fascinatingly oddball American subcultures such as professional wrestling, rappers, swingers, UFO enthusiasts, etc. In addition, he’s spent face-to-face time with various unique, somewhat eccentric celebrities in his series When Louis Met….

theroux-02.jpgSadly, the Best of Louis Theroux’s Weird Weekends volumes available in the UK have not made their way to the US yet, but his recent companion book thankfully has.

The Call of the Weird: Travels In American Subcultures (Da Capo Press) finds Theroux following up on some of the subjects of those Weird Weekends, and it’s a positively wonderful read. Here’s hoping that a network in the US sees fit to begin airing his work Stateside – particularly as he’s just begun a brand new series of specials for the BBC, the first of which took him to Las Vegas in an effort to understand the siren call of gambling.

linesm2.gif

KP: Right off the bat, let me say that I’ve been a fan of yours since the TV Nation days…

THEROUX: Wow.

KP: Is if you look back over the past 13 years, do you see anything different about what you’re doing now, compared to what your interests were then, as far as subject matter?

THEROUX: That’s a good question. In terms of subject matter, my interests are very much in the same area. I’m still interested in people whose choices seem, to me, in some way strange. And people who are in some kind of a gray area, perhaps morally, as far as what they do goes. The first segment I ever did for TV Nation was called “Millennium.” It wasn’t the first one that ever went out, but it was the first one I taped when I was 23 in 1994, and it was about different groups that think the end of the world is happening and is about to take place, and the ways in which they saw those prophecies being fulfilled. Over here in London right now, I’m editing a show that we just finished taping – tomorrow’s the last day of the edit – and it’s about the Phelps family, who are a religious group of Christians who basically think we’re in the last of the last days. It probably would have fit fairly comfortably in that original TV Nation segment. So there’s a sense in which I’m still plowing the same furrows, 13 years later. But I think the approach itself has changed a little bit.

KP: How would you define the approach, for a typical TV Nation segment? Or for your early Weird Weekends?

theroux-03.jpgTHEROUX: Back in the TV Nation days… I don’t want to distance myself from anything I’ve done, because they were all things that I had to go through. And some of that stuff still holds up. In those days, really, I was making short segments – six, seven, eight minute segments – and it was about making some jokes, eliciting some outrageous or ludicrous comments from the people that you’re with, thereby to make their beliefs seem strange or ridiculous, and get out. So occasionally it might seem that they could be… when I look at myself in some of them, I was perhaps a little bit callow, a little bit… let me think. Not in all of them, but in a couple of them perhaps, I don’t think maybe I totally leveled with the people I was with, and perhaps I didn’t… maybe, again, it was the notion of it being a shorter segment, but I was facing…

KP: Would you say you went in – you used the word “illicit” – almost with an agenda?

THEROUX: I don’t want to… any journalist, you could argue, has an agenda of some kind. I don’t mean to be reductive, but I suppose in an eight or nine minute segment in a program that is supposed to really be a comedy program, you don’t really have a chance to show people in different moods. And especially you don’t have a moment of, say, pathos for example. And maybe I didn’t always… you know, I’ve done stuff… like, I did a segment on the Ku Klux Klan, where it was really just… I was just trying to make the people… show them to be the poisonous, nasty people that many of those people really are.

KP: This was the segment on the new Klan?

THEROUX: The new Klan, yes. It was about outing them – like, they’re just as bad as the old Klan. And I think that’s valid. And that segment is still, I think, quite funny. But we did a thing more recently about neo-Nazis in California. Similar subject area, but it was at a greater length. It was an hour long documentary. For the new one, we were able to get to show a moment of pathos and bring out how in many respects these marginal, angry people are also victimizing themselves. Their rage comes out of a sense of impotence. And that they are more to be pitied than to be feared, by and large.

KP: Would you say then that the TV Nation pieces weren’t about doing a documentary portrait of these people?

THEROUX: You can’t really do a documentary portrait in eight or nine minutes. So no, they were just sort of… I suppose they were really just comical encounters between a bumbling English person that I was playing, and these offbeat weird Americans that I was interviewing. And so you can sort of take them for what their worth. I think the Ted Nugent one – that one still holds up pretty well, because you do get a sense of him giving me a hard time. He gets pretty angry with me. He calls me a lying sack of shit at one point. And I think that helps, actually.

KP: Would you consider that the first subject that you ever had that was combative in any way?

THEROUX: I’m trying to think. To begin with, I thought it was about sneaking under the radar, almost Borat style, and scoring hits against people. But actually, fairly quickly I learned that if people think they know what you’re up to, or if they just… if you just have a ding dong with someone, where they call you on what they think you’re doing and you go back and forth, it actually can be more powerful and it certainly is a more satisfying way of working.

KP: When you were in your early 20s at that point, and really going out and putting yourself out on a limb for the first time in those situations, with the only safety net being a small crew around even though you’re still out front, was there any point where you had a sort of learning curve in how to deal with those situations?

THEROUX: I’m wary of making it sound as though I was out there risking life and limb. Because certainly in the broad scheme of things, compared with sort of journalists in war zones or reporting from Rwanda or Grozny or somewhere like that, what I do and what I was doing then was very small potatoes. It was really… it was very… I don’t think in those early TV Nation days, I don’t think I ever felt like I was putting my neck on the line at all. I used to get nervous just because I was nervous. I was more nervous of getting in front of the camera, to be honest with you. Because I felt quite shy about… I never thought of myself as a performer, and I got a bit shy about… I don’t know, about stepping in front of the crew and saying things. It was a big step for me because, until then, I had only really done print journalism. I hadn’t even done that for very long. So I felt a little bit illegitimate.

KP: Do you think if TV Nation hadn’t come along you would have just continued down the path of print journalism?

THEROUX: I sometimes wonder about that. I suspect I probably would have. It’s really hard to know, but I think maybe I would have. I owe Michael Moore a debt of gratitude on that, big time.

KP: When you made that transition out of TV Nation… did you only do the first season?

THEROUX: No, I did the second one, as well. The second one I did a few. The Ted Nugent one…

KP: Okay, so that was for the Fox period…

THEROUX: I didn’t make the transition to when TV Nation reincarnated as The Awful Truth. I wasn’t around for that.

KP: At what point were you presented with the idea of doing the Weird Weekends?

theroux-04.jpgTHEROUX: The BBC had been partners in making the TV Nation shows, and they used to have a guy who’d come over called David Mortimer, and he was the BBC’s man in New York who would help produce the show a little bit. He approached me during the second season and said, “We’d love to do something with you if and when the time comes.” When the second season of TV Nation wasn’t picked up, he said, “We’d like to offer you a development deal.” And that’s what I did. I think it was a three month deal where I had to come up with ideas, and one of those ideas was Weird Weekends. Which was really just the idea of covering TV Nation type subjects, or the sorts of subjects I’d been covering at TV Nation, but in greater length and in more depth.

KP: Was that the idea that immediately came to the fore, or were there other ones that you juggled…

THEROUX: There were some other ideas, but I don’t think… I suppose nothing very exciting. I remember saying… this was in 1995 that I was signed to the deal, so I remember the millennium being a big thing at the time, so I had an idea to make a series that would be themed around the idea of millennial type weirdness. And then I had another idea that we did about traveling to dangerous places. The idea I came up with, the only one I thought was really doable, was the Weird Weekends one.

KP: I felt it interesting, having read the UK version of the book, that you wrote an introduction in the American edition distancing yourself from the word “weird”…

THEROUX: I feel like the word “weird” is a word that I’ve had an ambivalent relationship with almost from the inception of the show. It wasn’t my title. It was the title that was given to me by David Mortimer, this BBC guy. He came up with the title Weird Weekends. And the trouble with the word is that… what makes it work and also what makes it difficult is that it’s a pejorative word. Not for everyone, but most people don’t want to be weird and they don’t want to be considered weird. Also, as a critical instrument, the word is not very subtle, and it really more describes a subjective reaction to a phenomenon rather than the phenomenon itself. And I think that was something when I came to write the book I grappled with, too.

KP: It almost pre-packages the material you’re presenting as, “It’s all going to fall under this category…”

THEROUX: That’s right. I mean what else can you do, because how do you describe… you can’t call them Louis Theroux’s Interesting Weekends. Too vague.

KP: What was the title that you originally presented to the subject? Was it Louis Theroux’s America? Or American Adventure?

THEROUX: I think Louis Theroux’s America, yeah. We used it as a working title and I tried to come up with… you know, Weird Weekends had been mooted, and I said, “You know, let’s try and think of something else.” And everything I came up with was shot down. Having said that, let me just say that the documentaries we do, we’re still making, are no longer called Weird Weekends. They’re specials and they just come out as Louis Theroux: Gambling in Las Vegas or Louis Theroux: The Most Hated Family in America.

KP: I enjoyed the gambling special a great deal, by the way…

THEROUX: How did you get to see that?

KP: That’s the beauty of the internet.

THEROUX: That’s good.

KP: Are there any plans for further DVD releases?

THEROUX: It is not in the pipeline at the moment, but I think perhaps in the next year or so we’ll start getting it together. Why not, right? What’s the overhead? You can stick in on a disc and you can sell it from a website or something.

KP: Well, obviously the demand is out there. There are regular requests for your material out on the ‘net…

THEROUX: Well, that’s encouraging. Thank you very much.

KP: It was interesting to see… I guess that transition away from just categorizing them as Weird Weekends really occurred when you started doing the When Louis Met series, right?

THEROUX: Well, that certainly was when we stopped using the Weird Weekends title and rubric. It’s all part of an evolution, if you will, and I certainly feel that there’s a greater subtlety of tone in the Weird Weekends versus the segments that I was doing at TV Nation, and that that kind of has continued onto this day, so we hopefully put more emotional complexity, in terms of the more recent stuff, as well. But yeah, the word “weird” was dropped in the When Louis Met series.

KP: Was it a clear decision on your part to distance yourself from that label being attached to the work you were doing?

THEROUX: Well no, we just changed the title, really. It was more a case of… it wasn’t, “Well, we’re going to stop being weird now.” It just felt like the next thing. I suppose it would have been more odd to try to keep the word “weird” in there without it being warranted. The fact was we did a special about a UK celebrity called Jimmy Savile just before the third series of Weird Weekends went out, and enjoyed doing it, and it got a great reaction. So after the end of the third series of Weird Weekends it was just, “Well, let’s try making more of these UK celebrity type stories.”

KP: What do you find is the clear difference in tackling a celebrity subject as opposed to your average subject, as it were?

THEROUX: What is the difference? I mean certainly…

KP: Do you find your approach is different in actually approaching them, as people?

THEROUX: There’s a couple of things I’d say on that. One is, with Weird Weekends, and with a subject where there’s an activity or lifestyle involved, of which gambling would be one, you can structure a story which involves me participating at some point. And so that’s the first thing that makes it… I guess you’ve got something to fall back on in terms of creating your story. And the other thing, again with a subculture or lifestyle type story, you’ve got a reservoir of people you can draw on who are all representing… you know, if you get turned down by one casino – they won’t film with you – you try another one. And if one gambler doesn’t work out, you try another one. Obviously with a celebrity, once you’ve signed up to doing something with them, you sort of have to make it work. The story is more about charting your relationship with that person over the course of several days or a couple of weeks. So there’s no involvement of a more obviously participatory kind. Having said that, because these are people in the UK who most people will have heard of, there is a sort of immediacy to it that people really react to. Seeing intimate moments with people that they’ve only seen on TV in formal settings.

KP: I thought it was interesting. I’ve never seen you work so hard, and I mean that as a compliment, as you did in the Jimmy Savile piece…

THEROUX: Yes.

KP: You can actually see the sweat, of trying to crack that shell.

theroux-05.jpgTHEROUX: That’s right. And I think… you know, that’s one of my favorites, and I think one of the reasons it’s interesting is because he really… what can I say? He’s working as hard, if not harder, than I am. He’d obviously been thinking about making the documentary, about being elusive and trying to keep things moving and evading my questions and coming back at me with stuff and saying, “Next, next, next,” and all this kind of thing. And I think because that really made a big difference, and I think it’s one of those ones where, because you’re watching it thinking, “What’s going on with this eccentric character, and is he going to give anything away?” It really sustains the story, I think.

KP: He’s made you the focus of his documentary…

THEROUX: That’s right.

KP: How genuine do you feel that the revelation he made was? For someone who had shown himself to be so much playing this game of cat and mouse with you, when he makes this major revelation in that late night conversation…

THEROUX: Oh, I’m convinced that he didn’t realize the camera was rolling, and that he sort of dropped his guard, thinking that because I’d gone to bed, there was no way that we could possibly be filming. Because he never showed that side of him ever again in anything else I’ve ever seen. I’ve never seen him in that mode, where he’s swearing and simply relaxed. So I don’t feel as though that was part of his master strategy, I just think that was him in an unguarded moment.

KP: How difficult was it for you to essentially have the cameras turned on you during the Hamilton piece [NOTE: In When Louis Met The Hamiltons, his subjects – disgraced Tory MP Neil Hamilton and his wife Christine – had charges of a sexual nature brought against them while Louis was filming, which meant he was captured on camera in most of the news footage documenting the proceedings.] ?

theroux-06.jpgTHEROUX: That was pretty awkward, actually. I’ve come to realize in making these documentaries that one of the things I enjoy about being in worlds that are different from the one I inhabit is a kind of invisibility. And that I can escape from my normal life, my day-to-day existence, and just sort of inhabit a parallel existence, whether it’s in a mega casino in Vegas or in a strange religious group in Topeka, Kansas. But when we were making the Hamiltons program suddenly I was in the spotlight. Instead of invisibility I was more exposed. People began writing articles about, “What is Louis Theroux doing in there,” and, “Who is this geeky character in the margins and why is he making a documentary.” And so that part of it was uncomfortable for me.

KP: At certain times there almost seemed to be a point where the Hamiltons were pulling you in front of them like a human shield.

THEROUX: That’s right. I don’t quite know what that was about, except that I think they were a little lost at sea as well, and maybe they felt that perhaps… I mean, I know they’d had a rough ride in the press, and maybe they felt that I could deflect some of the hostility a little bit? I’m really not sure.

KP: It almost seemed to me that you were the human version of when she was debating whether or not to walk out with the flowers in hand to the press conference.

THEROUX: That’s right. I think I was maybe a prop, a little bit. A talking point. And a way of maybe distracting people.

KP: How do you believe that, particularly the celebrity subjects, view participating in a “Louis Theroux” piece? You’ve done enough of them now that they certainly can anticipate what they’re in store for…

THEROUX: I think it varies from person to person. I think as people… there are celebrities who would feel that it would be a great thing for them to do, and it could help to reveal a side of them that they haven’t been able to show before. I think there are other celebrities who cultivate more of a low profile. They try to keep a low profile, and for them it would be less appropriate. I do know that the shows that we’ve done about celebrities, almost all of them, the subjects themselves have come out at the end feeling they did well out of it. That it was a good thing for them to have done.

KP: Who do you think had the clearest sense of agenda about doing the piece?

THEROUX: I would say maybe… because everyone has some kind of an agenda, even if it’s just raising their profile or casting themselves in a better light. Max Clifford, who’s a celebrity publicist over here, who represents celebrities – among them Simon Cowell, I think – and he helps them hurdle the media. He obviously had an agenda – which was to try to show how he could manipulate me and reveal me and sort of beat me at my own game kind of thing. So his was the one where…

KP: He almost seemed vindictive.

THEROUX: He seemed kind of… with Jimmy Savile, you felt like he was battling me, and trying to manipulate me and manipulate the process a bit and, as it were, produce events that showed him in a different light. And that was all fine. It was a lot of fun. With Max Clifford, he did it in a different way. He planted stories about me in the papers and arranged for journalists and paparazzi to be around wherever we were about to turn up and film. And so that was more uncomfortable, definitely.

KP: It almost seemed like he was trying to teach you a lesson.

THEROUX: I think he was trying to teach me a lesson. I think he felt as though I wasn’t playing ball. I wasn’t playing the Max Clifford game. He had a certain way of operating, and I think he must have felt as though I wasn’t cooperating. And so I think he decided, as you say, to teach me a lesson by showing me… just giving me a taste of… well, bad publicity, really.

KP: Looking at that, what do you think the shape of a When Louis Met Louis would take?

THEROUX: That’s an interesting question. I’ve been asked that before. I really don’t think I’d be a great subject for When Louis Met Louis.

KP: Essentially what Clifford was trying to do, and Savile would try, and turn it around on you…

THEROUX: To be fair, with Jimmy Savile, I don’t think he was really interested in exposing me or finding out about me. I think he was just interested in battling me and frustrating me and throwing up smokescreens.

KP: With Savile it almost seemed like that was his way of dealing with anybody, was sort of, “Well, here’s how we’re going to define the relationship…”

THEROUX: Yeah. And I think he just enjoyed being tricky, and being mysterious. With Max Clifford, he was just… I think what he was doing was, as I said, trying to make me uncomfortable and showing me that he could make life difficult for me and that it wasn’t going to be sort of a one way street. You know, the paradox in documentary making is that – certainly in the kind that I do – is that the more awkward and difficult it gets for me, the more interesting it tends to be for the program itself. So the difficult and the more challenging subjects tend to be the most rewarding ones. And that’s definitely true of both Jimmy Savile and Max Clifford. For me as a person, I like to think I’m fairly normal. I’m not a natural interviewee in a sense that I don’t really like talking about myself, my private life, how I live, my choices, my opinions. So When Louis Met Louis, I think I’d find myself pretty frustrating, and perhaps not in a good way. At some level, a good subject has to enjoy the spotlight. They have to feel like, “This is my moment to shine and to show everyone how the world really is and how I really am.” I don’t feel particularly… I don’t feel any great urge to do that.

KP: I found it fascinating, those brief glimpses of yourself that you gave during the introduction to the American edition to the book…

THEROUX: Oh, well, that’s interesting. It’s not something I normally do. I was encouraged to do that by my US publisher – just to say, “Look, it’s different in the UK. You’ve got more of a profile. Over here people won’t know anything about you, so just let people in a little bit.” I always worry if I talk too much about myself I’ll sort of become less interesting as a character in the programs themselves.

KP: I don’t know. I think the few slices that we have seen have always proved fascinating. I mean, obviously, speaking personally, you’ve been interesting to me from the very start with the TV Nation pieces. It’s interesting you brought up, as one of the subject points to try and introduce the American book, the dual nature of your personality, with the combination of the UK and US influences.

THEROUX: Well, that’s true, you know. I definitely feel more American than I come across. I think I say that in the introduction. My dad has had such an impression on me in terms of forming my character and my outlook, that people sometimes assume that I’m more British… and perhaps I’m being more critical, that I’m more distanced from the world that I investigate than I really am. I’ve even been accused in one review of being anti-American. Which really shocked me because I think of myself, if anything, as the opposite. I think of myself as someone who celebrates the American outlook, and celebrates the spirit of can-do, of openness and un-self-consciousness that I find in America.

KP: Do you feel if you tackled these same subjects just in a UK arena that you’d be seen as anti-British?

THEROUX: Well, I don’t think…

KP: I mean, these obsessive personality types are in some ways archetypes…

THEROUX: They wouldn’t exist in Britain in quite the same way. Certainly, I think people in Britain are a bit more careful not to be seen to celebrate themselves and their world in quite the same ways. I think I could do similar stories in Britain, and as you know I’ve done profiles of intriguing British people. But I think it’s a less rich canvas for me. And I think that’s just because of the nature of the culture in America. It’s more open.

KP: It’s interesting that you only attempted to do a US personality once. It was a great documentary, but it failed miserably in actually attaining the person you were going after.

THEROUX: That’s right. And in fact we attempted to do one with Ike Turner, of course. And that’s a chapter in the book where I describe why it didn’t come to fruition. That maybe wasn’t cultural, but it was more the nature of his personality. That was when I wanted him to do a When Louis Met an American celebrity.

KP: In the introduction to the book, you mentioned the idea that your father (famed author and world traveler Paul Theroux) made sure you and your brother would have these sojourns to the US to combat, or to put in the mixture to complement, the Britishness that you were picking up living in the UK…

THEROUX: To deprogram us, you know? Because he even said, at one point, “I want to put you in an American high school for a year, or a junior high for a year,” when I was about 12. I said, “Oh, I don’t think so.” Changing schools is such a wrench. Later on he told me it was because he thought my brother and I were becoming too British. But it kind of did work, I think. At the annual American sojourns that we took, every summer we’d spend a few months on Cape Cod… Spent time with our family and went kayaking and sculpted wax and went camping and stuff like that. Whether or not it was those activities specifically or just… you know, because my mum wouldn’t come over, or she’d come over for a week or two weeks. But just having our dad there for the whole time. There was a touch of Mosquito Coast about the whole thing.

KP: That was the one thing that came my mind when reading the intro, I was like, “So, hacking brush away and such combats Britishness…”

THEROUX: He never took us down to Central America, but there was a little bit of that.

KP: A sort of “Boy’s Own Adventure” deal. What do you feel was the American influence he was trying to impart?

THEROUX: I don’t know that he consciously had an agenda or a checklist of traits that he was attempting to instill in us, but I do think he had a general sense that the boyhood that had formed him – which he was an Eagle Scout, a keen marksman with a gun, a camper…. He listened to outward bound type stuff. All those sorts of activities were things that he felt would be… he was into rowing as well. An oarsman. He felt those would be beneficial to us. I think he felt, perhaps… he wanted to give us a taste of the childhood that he had growing up in Boston in the 50s. 40s, 50s. And just sort of… my dad is a can-do guy. He’s a travel writer. He travels by himself. He’s an independent spirit. He believes in going out and doing things on your own and he doesn’t have a lot of time for people he regards as supine or insufficiently self starting. So I think it was just that kind of spirit of independence and self-sufficiency that he was trying to teach us about.

KP: Which he felt that the British influence would not have delivered properly?

THEROUX: Partly it’s the nature of the environment. If you’re in south London… you know what I mean?

KP: Yes… it’s not exactly the outward bound environment.

THEROUX: It’s not outward bound. You know, you can walk around on Richmond Common, but that’s about it. I think there’s a part egalitarian… from the age of 10 he sent us to a private school in London, which was quite a small-minded little school. It was in some ways out of the 1930s.

KP: Very Tomkinson’s Schooldays

THEROUX: Class riddled and sort of status obsessed, and wasn’t very nice. And inevitably that had an effect on us as kids. We internalized some of that. And I think he wanted us to learn a little about the more egalitarian part of American culture. Which may or may not be a myth. I know there’s a debate, “Is America a classless society,” but definitely there’s a sort of… I think a salutary myth that anyone can be the president, and we’re all equal under the Constitution. And I think part of that was something that he wanted us to learn about.

KP: The ability to embrace the illusion of a classless society?

THEROUX: He wouldn’t have phrased it like that, and it’s not something he every explicitly said, but I think he just felt like… he just didn’t want us to be snobs. It’s as simple as that, really.

KP: Do you ever feel an encroaching snobbishness?

THEROUX: The school that we went to at that time was a snobby little school. All I can say is, I think the trips over to America in the summer were very enjoyable and it was fun… although I didn’t realize it at the time, I think it has more of an effect on me than I knew.

KP: You live in Britain primarily, but you still make these, almost for the same span of time, trips to the U.S. …

THEROUX: That’s true. Although I don’t go over in the summer for two or three months, but I go back and forth quite a bit.

KP: It’s almost like an inoculation, it seems.

THEROUX: Well, that’s one way of looking at it… I don’t know. I have to be careful that I don’t romanticize it. I lived in America for five or six years in the 90s, and any time I go back I tend to really enjoy it. So I have to be careful I don’t sort of overdo it, because I know I find American Anglophiles sometimes… I’m a bit suspicious. I feel like you’re not seeing the whole picture. So I don’t want to go overboard. You’ve got to take the good with the bad, haven’t you?

KP: I would think so. It goes back to your discussion about doing fuller portraits…

THEROUX: That’s right. But I do. I like to go back… whenever I go back I feel like it’s a shot in the arm, really.

KP: Is it the people you encounter, or just the society in general? What do you find is the thing that energizes you when you make that journey, whenever you do?

THEROUX: That’s a good question. I think basically… inevitably, the view is colored by the fact that I’m doing a story. So I’ll be immersed in an interesting world. Whenever I’m traveling for work, I’m plunged into an environment that is in some way unusual and interesting. Having said that, there’s something more which I think is just the sense that life is being lived at a high pitch. The news stories tend to be big. The country itself is big. There’s a sense of scale to the way that life is lived there. So I’ll pick up a New York Times, and in any copy there’ll be three or four stories I’m fascinated by. It’s really hard to put my finger on. I think the other thing is just a sense of… like I was referring to earlier, there’s a sense of invisibility. Whereas in Britain, wherever you go, your accent tends to mark you as being from a certain class and a certain place. In America, I’m invisible because I’m just someone from Britain. I’m an outsider. And people don’t tend to be… there’s a certain level of… people in America aren’t… to make a generalization, but there’s a lot of Americans who aren’t terribly informed about the outside world. So you’re invisible in that way, too. That people don’t tend to know much about where I’m from. I think the other thing is – I think I mentioned this in my introduction – the prejudices that exist in America about British people tend to be very positive ones, by and large.

KP: Perhaps being more intelligent than most…

THEROUX: Yeah. The idea goes that you’re maybe a little more gentlemanly, courteous, maybe well educated. All of which may or may not be true, but that seems to be the prejudice.

KP: It seems like the opinions about Americans are tending to get worse within the UK. Of course, especially if you listen to people like Jeremy Clarkson (laughing)…

THEROUX: That’s right. I don’t know, you may be right about that.

KP: Do you feel an American could come over and do a similar thing in the UK?

THEROUX: That’s a good question. I don’t think the stories are big enough, somehow.

KP: Have you ever mooted the idea of doing, not a celebrity-based, but just a story-based piece within the UK? Like going up to Blackpool to do the gambling special…

THEROUX: We have talked a little bit about that, and there may be a way of doing a show like that, but it would be a different kind of show. I think part of what people, certainly in Britain, enjoy about the show is a sense of discovery and a sense of the exotic. That these are places they’d like to go to. They’re worlds that they’d like to investigate if they had the money or the time or the opportunity. And you wouldn’t get that to the same extent here. Britain is well known to British people, by and large. So I think there would be less appeal, in that sense.

KP: I was speaking with Neil Innes a few months back…

THEROUX: Right, from the Rutles…

KP: We were talking about a tour he’d done in the US the year before last. He and his wife went across the country. He hadn’t realized how long the distances were. What seemed like it would be, “Oh, this will be a couple of hours and we’ll be here…” turned into a day and a half. That America was like the Tardis, to Brits.

THEROUX: That’s true, isn’t it?

KP: That until you’re actually on the ground, it doesn’t seem like it should be as large as it does to traverse these distances.

THEROUX: That’s really true, and that’s one of the great things… the scale of America, the size of it. I think that’s one of the reasons I do like Vegas. As vulgar as it can be and as commercial and money obsessed, you just have to go up to the 25th floor of any of the big hotels and you’ve got a view out to these barren mountains that ring the city and you feel so… I don’t know. There’s something really liberating about it. And however wrong your life went, you have somewhere you could go and hide. I know that’s a slightly weird way of looking at it, but there’s something very comforting in that.

KP: Almost a sense of disconnectedness by means of the sheer vastness of the areas?

THEROUX: Yeah, and also a chance of a second… that you have a second chance in your life to reinvent yourself. I suppose that’s the other part of the American ideal…

KP: That’s sort of a British boyhood dream in many ways, isn’t it? I mean, about going off and remaking yourself as a higher class?

THEROUX: Definitely a higher class, or whatever it is. Even that’s what The Great Gatsby is about, in a sense. This guy, James Gatz, who goes off and sort of reinvents himself as this blue blood multimillionaire.

KP: And having the distance to pull it off and being completely cut off just by means of that distance from anyone who might know the old you.

THEROUX: That’s right. That’s very appealing, I think, in some ways.

KP: You’ve just signed a deal for, what, ten more specials for the BBC?

THEROUX: I’ve got to make ten shows, of which the first one was kind of a compilation show that went out a few weeks ago. And then the second one was the Vegas one. And these are specials, so we just sort of put them out when they’re ready. The one we’re editing at the moment, I mentioned, is about the Phelps family in Topeka, Kansas, who as you may or may not know picket soldiers’ funerals with anti-gay slogans and placards with words like “God Hates Fags” and so on. And after that we’re not really sure. We’ve got a few things bubbling under. And maybe some things outside America, too.

KP: Is there any topic that’s been elusive for you over the years?

THEROUX: That’s an interesting one. You know there’s one… For a long time we wanted to do something on – one of the first ideas I had was to do something on gangsta rap. And then it wasn’t until the third series of Weird Weekends that we sort of got that together and figured out that it would work well if we did it in the American south. You know, there’s a lot of people who I’ve been fascinated to do something with. Personalities I’d love to make documentaries about. Mike Tyson is a name that has come up quite a few times. I would love to get a couple of weeks just to film with him and find out about his life. It’s just a question of trying to build the trust and get the access.

KP: I thought you’ve already done Chris Eubank (laughing)…

THEROUX: We did Chris Eubank, that’s right.

KP: So are we eventually going to see When Louis Met Michael Moore?

THEROUX: I don’t think we’ll see When Louis Met Michael Moore. I think that documentary’s been made a few times, hasn’t it?

KP: No, not that I’ve seen. Or to the level that I think you would be able to present a portrait of him.

THEROUX: I know a guy made one called Michael Moore Hates America, but I never saw it. Did you?

KP: Yes.

THEROUX: What was it like?

KP: It’s like if you were to take the Michael Jackson documentary you did, but throw an agenda into it. This person was trying to make it fit into the pre-determined portrait he already had.

THEROUX: Right.

KP: So it was more of a, “I’m going to expose Michael Moore” piece.

THEROUX: Oh really?

KP: Yes.

THEROUX: Interesting. I wonder if that’s available online anywhere.

KP: Yes, it’s available on DVD I believe.

THEROUX: It is?

KP: Yes.

THEROUX: Oh, I’d like to see that.

KP: It was very much an idea of… It was a conservative piece that pretty much goes in with, “This is going to be our polemic against Michael Moore.”

THEROUX: Interesting. And there were a few other people who talked about doing something like that, including people who worked with him, but I’m not sure they ever came to anything.

KP: As far as I’ve seen, nothing has come down the pike.

THEROUX: Interesting. I’ve really got nothing but good things to say about Michael. One of the surreal aspects of doing my book was that it was sort of the “Year of Michael Moore.” 2004 was when I made the bulk of the trip. Bowling for Columbine had come out the previous year, and then Fahrenheit 9/11 came out that year, if I have my timeline correct. But definitely everywhere I went… in these marginal worlds, he’s really regarded with… I mean, it wasn’t just the mainstream that seemed to be overtaken with him. It was also… his influence permeated every nook and cranny of American culture, so it seemed. So when I did an interview with Richard Butler, who was the Aryan Nation’s ailing leader at that point – he died subsequently – but he even started talking about how much he’d enjoyed Fahrenheit 9/11.

KP: It’s interesting when a person becomes a representative for a belief system. They move beyond being just a person but become a representative of something for someone. Sort of a shorthand to describe something…

THEROUX: That’s right.

KP: And certainly during that period Michael became that.

THEROUX: Have you interviewed him?

KP: Many times. In fact when I was at NYU in ’95, I would fax into the production office looking for a PA position on TV Nation, not realizing it’d already been cancelled.

THEROUX: Really? How funny.

KP: I remember having dinner with him around the time of The Big One. He was doing a college tour at the time and I’d actually gone up and had dinner with him in Raleigh. It was interesting to see how slowly but surely he’s closed off to the public. Because he was always famous for, you know, “Here’s my email address on AOL. Send me an email, contact me.” I remember having instant messenger chats with him about various things during the mid to late 90s. And then all of a sudden, he just sort of dried up. You couldn’t get to him. There was a layer of people before you could even arrange an interview with him. So eventually I just gave up even trying to get an interview with him.

THEROUX: Well, what can you say? He’s like an icon now.

KP: I can imagine when things started getting hairy during that period of 2004, I can see why you might want to put a bit of a buffer zone.

THEROUX: I mentioned it must be very weird to achieve that level of… not just visibility, but to be so identifiable with a worldview.

KP: To the point when you literally become a puppet in someone’s film in order to represent something.

THEROUX: Right…

KP: Well, I can’t tell you how much I look forward to your additional specials down the pike…

THEROUX: Well, I hope you enjoy them. There’s definitely some good stuff coming up.

KP: And I certainly hope that the DVDs make their way out, with the programs that haven’t been released yet.

THEROUX: Yes. Well, we’ll see what we can do on that. There’s definitely some good stuff that needs to come out.

KP: Just the demand from people who are otherwise chasing them down online…

THEROUX: You’d think that would be a good sign, wouldn’t you?

KP: I would hope so! And hopefully there’s another book or two in you. Until then, I’ll just catch whatever’s online… In addition to the gambling special, I also caught you on Jonathan Ross, as well as your episode of The Weakest Link

THEROUX: My word, they’ve got everything. I’m trying to suppress that stuff! (laughing) No, I’m just joking.

KP: I watched the Weakest Link episode. I can see why. I’ve never seen you more uncomfortable.

THEROUX: I know, it was unbelievable.

KP: Hopefully in the future, we’d definitely love to speak with you again and see where things stand…

THEROUX: Well, I would love that. Thank you so much for your time, Ken. I really appreciate it.

theroux-07.jpg

Preachin’ From The Longbox: Juss Don’t Believe The Hype

Filed under: Columns,Preaching from the Longbox — UncaScroogeMcD @ 2:05 am
longbox.gif

This week’s sermon – “Juss Don’t Believe The Hype”

March 12, 2007

For those of you who fell into a light coma, and have finally woken up, the “shocking” epilogue of Marvel’s Civil War, Captain America #25, was released this past Wednesday.

Why is the significance of that issue, you ask? Other than the issue hitting the quarter-century mark, I mean, really doesn’t every issue hit that supposed milestone? (Well not the criminally shit-canned The Thing). Well, since you’ve lived this long without hearing about the news and normally, this would be considered a spoiler in some circles, I’ll let you avert your eyes and quickly click on some other link here at the Quick Stop.

(Twiddles thumbs”¦)

I hear that the recent “SModcast” podcast and “Game On” vidcast are quite good.

(Looks at watch”¦)

Alrightey then, time’s up.

For those of you strong enough to stick around, the driving force behind Cap #25 is that:

Captain America #25

Cap gets CAPPED!

Yup, he’s dead as a door nail – or, to use a more current comparison, as dead as Sanjaya’s chances for winning Idol. But don’t worry; he’ll get some work in the entertainment industry as El DeBarge in next year’s biopic, Gang Wars: DeBarge versus The Jets. Jennifer Hudson has shown the way – Hallelujah!

Again, this latest revelation by Marvel is no big deal. Steve Rogers has been removed from the comic book scene more once in his storied continuity; most recently during the whole Heroes Reborn mess. (Although, he was really just put in a marble courtesy of Franklin Richards but that’s just semantics and bad plotting but let’s continue).

There are bits of news coverage out there from the New York Daily News to the L.A. Times to Newsweek to the Colbert Report talking about the death and that’s well and good. I don’t see a problem with any comic company getting some good, juicy, tabloid-style press. With all of the other entertainment options other there right now, comics needs all of the help that it can get.

However, my beef with this whole Captain America slaying thing isn’t the amount of press for Cap’s assassination. It’s something else which usually comes along with the hype that is completely familiar and horrifying at the same time. Let me illustrate:

A certain iconic superhero died and it was hyped up in the news like it was a real death. It was plastered all over the place and you couldn’t escape people commenting about it for days. The “death” issue, with a variant cover, was sold out completely and the comic book publisher started to ship out second and third printings (with a different cover) to keep up with the demand.

Comic shops were jacking up cover prices on that death issue as well as all of those back issues that contained any part of this storyline just as lapsing readers as well as non-comic book readers were driving in droves to buy these “special” comics; earmarking them as investments for their children.

Then, after a few weeks, the buzz started to wane and the comic book publisher started a new all-encompassing story arc in a way to keep the attention going. After awhile, the buying masses started to see through the marketing ploy and the comics industry was looking at a real crisis ““ a failing business strategy where their readership was dwindling.

That was, as you have probably guessed, the Death of Superman. The year was 1993, otherwise known as the beginning of the Decline of Western Comic Book Readership.

Let’s cut to today. Comics survived the speculator nose dive and have built themselves back into a relatively thriving business with more Cons and bankable theatrical blockbusters left and right (Nic Cage’s Elvis-talking his way thought Ghost Rider was the latest in that trend). Also, their recent multi-title story arcs, Infinite Crisis and Civil War, were, for the most parts, hits.

So, the people running the four-color “show” for the Big Two, so to speak, have gotten decidedly a little cocky. So, what is the first thing that they do with their newfound ignorance? Shocker; they forget their history and repeat 1993 all over again.

Here are some telling excerpts from what I’ve read so far in some of the various published reports:

ICv2 News ““ “One important issue is whether Marvel is able to get enough copies into the market to dampen speculation. If the news becomes ‘look what this comic from last week/month is worth’ instead of ‘look at this cool storyline in Marvel comics,’ look out.” (PftL – Here, here. Well said.)

New York Daily News – “‘I was shocked. I was not expecting it,’ said Gerry Gladston, co-owner of Midtown Comics in Manhattan. ‘I’d rather they didn’t kill him – but it’s going to mean great sales.'” (PftL – Oy vey. Déjà vu, anyone?)

In case you were wondering, Mr. Gladston was not joking. Chop Socky - Chris Simon

The secondary market for this issue is seeing some very questionable on-line retailers marking the issue up by almost 650% over the cover price while eBay, the arbiter of gauging at its finest, has more than one auction with the two covers for a starting bid of $2000. Two large for an overprinted comic book that will be collected in six months and retconned within a year? Are you kidding me? Am I the only one getting sick from a case of the (Re)runs?

Ya know, the first thing that comes around a rotting corpse is a vulture and the equivalent of this nasty animal in the comics industry is speculators. They are a group of people most foul. Not to get too pious (yeah right) but these profiteers not only reduce comics into a poor man’s form of day trading but they also take away the essence of comics and turn it from a intimate medium to tell a story into a sterile, slabbed commodity. This practice makes me so sick I feel like Simonizing someone.

I’m sure that the “Cap Death” and subsequent “Fallen Soldier” story arcs will be finely told tales and people will buy them en masse. I’m just worried what will happen to the comics industry after all of the buzz has died once again and the shop owners are left with millions of funny books and mounting issues of their own.

-britt

Noctural Admissions: Movie Review – Zodiac

Filed under: Columns,Nocturnal Admissions,Reviews — UncaScroogeMcD @ 1:49 am
nocturnalheader5.gif

David Fincher’s Zodiac (from a script by James Vanderbilt adapted from Robert Graysmith’s intimate true life account) begins on the fourth of July in 1969 at the height of the hippie era. As fireworks explode over the bay, a young woman namded Darlene Ferrin (Ciara Hughes ) cruises along a packed suburban street, pulling up at a nondescript house. She invites a youth named Michael Mageau (Lee Norris) into her car and the pair drive off to eat. But the drive in being full up, she quickly changes her mind, and they end up at the Blue Rock Springs Golf Course, where there is a lover’s lane.

Zodiac Matt

The youth is callow and awkward, and doesn’t seem to be aware that Darlene is seeking sex, or at least a make out session. Their banter is interrupted by the ominous growl of a car, one that hovers nearby and then pulls away. Darlene seems to know the driver. But she won’t admit as much to Mageau. Then the car comes back quickly. The driver gets out, comes over to the passenger’s side, and opens fire on the occupants.

Though on the surface rather routine sounding, this is a very interesting scene and it is an interesting way to open a film about the notorious and uncaught serial killer, America’s Jack the Ripper. For one thing, this wasn’t the Zodiac killer’s first attack. Fincher could just as easily have started off his film with the Lake Herman Road double murder the previous December, as does Alexander Bulkley in his 2005 knock off film The Zodiac, with Justin Chambers and Robin Tunney, which also shows the impact of the Zodiac’s crimes on those who hunted him.

Zodiac death

In fact, there are numerous coincidences between the two films. Both star Philip Baker Hall, as a police chief in The Zodiac and as a handwriting expert in Zodiac. Both films shoot mostly in the case’s actual locations. Both are about how obsession destroys the good, and both feature similar dialogue in the Zodiac’s third attack, in broad daylight at Lake Berryessa in September 1969, where the Zodiac wore a scary black hood.

One significant difference is that Fincher and his collaborators extend a great deal of attention on the personalities of the victims, communicating quite a bit about them in a short screen time. Which brings us back to the opening scene. As an aggressive, sexual creature, Darlene is an unusual figure in Fincher’s movies – but not his videos (has anyone else noticed her similarity to Madonna?). She is also a person whose past, her recent past, catches up with her quickly, as we learn near the end of the movie when the Zodiac’s connection with Darlene is revealed (here is a long footnote: it’s been a long time since I’ve read Graysmith’s book and its sequel, but is it possible that there was no actual Zodiac, that the reason the cases are so different from each other is that they were in fact acts of passion committed by different people? The only thing I remember really tying Zodiac to one of the crimes was the fact that he clipped off parts of a cabbie’s blood stained shirt. Is it possible that Zodiac was s a cop, writing the letters and posing as the killer in order to make some kind of point or toy with his co-workers? Also, as Robert Downey, Jr.’s character says in the movie, the Zodiac was a liar, taking credit for things he couldn’t have done; but again, I haven’t kept up with the book, and the suspect that Graysmith came up with is probably really the guy).

Zodiac Bob

Fincher probably remembers aspects of the real case from his childhood, but he doesn’t seem necessarily interested in the case as a nostalgic tour. Instead, it is another exercise in failed mentorship, a theme that appears in most of his films. Cartoonist Robert Graysmith (Jake Gyllenhaal) is as young and callow as the film’s first victim, but he is already divorced and is a single father. He goes through one mentor who fails him, Downey’s Paul Avery, the Chronicle reporter who covered the case, and then another, Mark Ruffalo’s Inspector David Toschi (the real life cop who inspired Bullitt). Graysmith, who in the film has the enthusiasm of a boy scout and is thus referred to by others (though he says he was an Eagle Scout, and he acts with the pushy enthusiasm of Robert Cummings’s character in Dial M for Murder), cracks the case, but, as with the others, at great cost, in his case at the expense of his marriage.

Zodiac road

Harry Savides’s camerawork throughout the film is remarkable (but I assume that Fincher is the type of director who collaborates with a DP closely). It doesn’t just honor films from the ’70s – it is one. And several of the shots will go down in film history, such as the overhead shot of a cab going through San Francisco, with the camera moving above in sync as if the car were the planchette on a Ouija Board.

In fact, this is a movie “about” cars. They figure in almost every scene. They are the setting of almost every murder. Many of the film’s character building moments occur in cars, at least with Toschi.

Zodiac Jake

Some film buffs have raised the question of whether the film, in its final moments, backs off from the “knowability” of the Zodiac’s final identity, even though in the real world Graysmith is convinced of it. There is a small measure of ambiguity in the film’s final images. But Zodiac isn’t like a Friedkin movie, such as French Connection or Cruising, in which the director strives for a larger epistemological strata. Zodiac does create ambiguity by having different people “play” the Zodiac. A different person from the prime suspect voices the Zodiac at the Lake Berryessa killing. Another puzzling image connected with this sequence is this: who is the guy sitting in his pick up truck obviously in mental anguish? He doesn’t look like the guy who later turns out to be the prime suspect.

Zodiac Chloe

No, the real mystery in the film is Graysmith’s motivation. “Bob, you look disappointed,” Avery says at Graysmith’s reaction to another dead end clue. What is the source of Graysmith’s immediate and almost visceral attraction to the case? The film is officially mute on the subject, although there is the odd, stray dialogue on the subject, such as when Graysmith is talking to his wife (played by the great Chloe Sevigny, who, with her long hair and bookish glasses embodies just the type of girl everyone got a crush on back in the ’70s).

Zodiac zero

In this film, Fincher is a master of transitions, be it the sound of traffic that leaps years, or the subtle placement of movie posters (one of them for Edward G. Robinson’s Warner film Illegal) in Graysmith’s apartment just before he encounters one Bob Vaughn, a silent movie theater employee who might be able to give him a lead. Movies permeate the film. Zodiac himself is a movie buff and there were numerous movie references in his letters. Fincher even honors Val Lewton with a “bus,” the sudden appearance of Vaughn sliding into view in a mirror. And it turns out, which is something I didn’t know and couldn’t even guess at, that the Zodiac symbol might have come from the countdown leader on a film strip. In its weird, perverse way, Zodiac is testimony to he embedded influence of movies and moviemakers on our lives.

QSE News: 3/12/2007

Filed under: Columns,News — UncaScroogeMcD @ 1:32 am
quickstopnews.jpg
line1.gif

Here are today’s top entertainment headlines:

  • qsnews.jpg
  • The scantily clad Spartan film 300 was number one at the box office this weekend after grossing more than $70 million. In addition to setting a March opening-day box-office record, the film also succeeded in confusing the sexual identity of more than two million adolescent males.
  • Maggie Gyllenhaal has been selected to replace Katie Holmes as the character Rachel Dawes in next Batman film. Gyllenhaal’s co-stars in the film are said to be excited by the opportunity to work with an actress whose husband isn’t keeping her locked in a basement.
  • It appears the real reason the Van Halen reunion tour was called off is because Eddie Van Halen is entering rehab for undisclosed reasons. This announcement may go down as the biggest shock in music news history. And by biggest, we mean totally expected.
  • France is getting set to release a set of stamps showcasing the characters of the Harry Potter book and film series.  French officials are insisting that the stamps are an honor and not merely a roundabout way of licking Harry and his friends’ backside. And by backside we mean butt.
line1.gif

That’s all for today’s news, stay tuned to this channel for all the news that matters least but you still care about.

(Compiled by J. Allen)

##

Quick Stop Thingamabobs: 3/12/2007

Filed under: Columns,Thingamabobs — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:26 am
thingamabobs.jpg

The web. It’s a big place, full of plenty of distractions ““ some funny, some informative, some ludicrous, some disturbing, some inane, some profound. Each and every weekday, we present links to a few of our favorite finds”¦

————————————————

  • How To Succeed In Film Festivals… Wihout Really Trying… (Thingamabob)
  • I may be American, but I can’t tell you how giddy I am that my favorite MP of all, Boris Johnson, has a website… The man is like a human Muppet… (Thingamabob)
  • Don’t believe me? Check him out in this segment from one of his guest-hosting stints on Have I Got News For You(Thingamabob)
  • Ren Faires and monster trucking – a match made in heaven… (Thingamabob)

Have a THINGAMABOB? Send it in!

##

March 11, 2007

Contest: Win Boba Fett From Sideshow!

Filed under: Contests — widge @ 5:20 am

Quick Stop Entertainment is giving away a Premium Format Boba Fett figure, courtesy of the fine folks at Sideshow Collectibles. Don’t miss your chance to win this premium format figure.

Contest closed! Thanks for playing!

Official Rules

No member of Quick Stop Entertainment or their immediate families may enter. (Darn I hate this rule!!!!).

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

All individuals who opt-in to receiving the Sideshow Collectibles Newsletter understand that they will be receiving e-mail newsletters from Sideshow Collectibles, which details their new licenses, upcoming products, monthly giveaways, and guest interviews! Entrants understand and agree to Sideshow Collectibles’ privacy policy, and understand that they may cancel their Sideshow Collectibles Newsletter subscription at anytime. No purchase is necessary to win this contest.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:50PM, EST, April 8, 2007.

Important Shipping Information:

All winners agree to pay shipping on any prizes granted by Sideshow Collectibles during any contest or giveaway. Specific details can be found in our contest terms section. Please read these carefully before entering.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after announcement of win to receive the product. All prizes are non-transferable, with no cash redemptions and/or substitutions except at Sponsor’s sole discretion. All international winners will be responsible for any duties, tariffs, taxes or import fees assessed to their prize. Further some countries outside of the U.S. do not have reliable mail services. In the event that a prize has been stolen or mishandled during shipment to an international destination, Sideshow may not be able to replace the specific item. If the winner prefers a specific quicker shipping method, they are responsible to notify us immediately and will also be responsible to cover the additional costs if any.

Delivery time & Restrictions:

All continental US orders are shipped FedEx ground service. Because FedEx cannot provide tracking numbers for P.O. Boxes, Sideshow Collectibles will no longer ship to a P.O. Box. Please provide your street address or your shipment will be delayed. For FedEx Ground deliveries, please allow up to 6 business days for delivery from the date your order is shipped. Please visit the Sideshow Collectibles website for restrictions on International Shipping.

Scrubs Blog: My Big Picture Show

Filed under: Production Blogs,Scrubs Blog — UncaScroogeMcD @ 5:10 am
scrubsheader.jpg


BLOG ALBUM: “My Big Picture Show” ““
Things are getting crazy busy around the Scrubs offices as the shooting season rapidly comes to a close, so we thought we’d take a little time this week for a picture album look around Sacred Heart’s sets and environs (all photos by Brian Davison)…

[ CLICK THE PICS FOR A LARGER VERSION ]

line3.gif
scrubspics-01.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-02.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-03.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-04.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-05.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-06.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-07.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-08.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-09.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-10.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-11.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-12.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-13.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-14.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-15.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-16.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-17.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-18.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-19.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-20.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-21.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-22.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-23.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-24.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-25.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-26.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-27.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-28.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-29.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-30.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-31.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-32.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-33.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-34.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-35.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-36.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-37.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-38.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-39.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-40.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-41.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-42.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-43.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-44.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-45.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-46.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-47.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-48.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-49.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-50.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-51.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-52.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-53.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-54.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-55.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-56.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-57.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-58.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-59.jpg
line3.gif
scrubspics-60.jpg
line3.gif

The Fred Hembeck Show: Episode 95 – Marvel Busts A Cap

Filed under: The Fred Hembeck Show — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:35 am

fredhembeckheader.jpg

fredhembeck2007-03-10-01.gif

fredhembeck2007-03-10-02.gif

fredhembeck2007-03-10-03.gif

fredhembeck2007-03-10-04.gif

fredhembeck2007-03-10-05.gif

fredhembeck2007-03-10-06.gif

fredhembeck2007-03-10-07.gif

fredhembeck2007-03-10-08.gif

fredhembeck2007-03-10-09.gif

fredhembeck2007-03-10-10.gif

fredhembeck2007-03-10-11.gif

Hembeck.com – free of radioactive sperm for over four years now – and we aim to keep it that way!!

-Copyright 2007 Fred Hembeck

March 9, 2007

Ken P. D. Snyde-Cast #26: The Bunny Hop

Filed under: Ken P.D. Snydecast — UncaScroogeMcD @ 4:21 am

snydecast-header.png

snydecast-logo2.png

Adult Swim’s Dana Snyder and FRED’s Ken Plume set out to have a literate conversation between two pals, but inevitably devolve into a verbal, and funny, free-for-all full of bickering, infighting, and the special kind of male bonding that comes from conflict expressed through the podcast medium.

Actor/comedian/raconteur Dana Snyder, you’re certainly aware, is Aqua Teen Hunger Force’s Master Shake, Squidbillies‘ Granny, Minoriteam’s Dr. Wang, and The Venture Bros.‘ Alchemist. Available for weddings and bar mitzvahs (bat availability pending), you can keep tabs on him via his website, www.eyeofthesnyder.com.

Ken Plume is the editor-in-chief here at FRED. He is a friend of Dana’s, as well as his arch-nemesis.

VISIT THE SNYDECAST EXPERIENCE

linesm.gif

KEN P.D. SNYDECAST #26: The Bunny Hop – [adult swim]’s Dana Snyder and Ken Plume’s weekly chat podcast returns, as Ken & Dana discuss listener mail, find out how much Dana would charge to watch cartoons with his fans at the Bunny Ranch, and go through some recent actory additions to Dana’s record collection…

[CONTENT WARNING]: This podcast may contain some foul language and horribly off-color jokes. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
Episode #26 (MP3 format)

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/snydecast/ken_p_d_snyde_cast-26.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

Got something to say? E-mail Dana & Ken at the Snydecast mailbag.

line.gif

CLICK HERE FOR THE SNYDECAST ARCHIVES

line.gif

##

Comics in Context #168: O Captain! My Captain!

Filed under: Columns,Comics in Context — admin @ 4:17 am
comicsincontext4.jpg

cic2007-03-09-01.jpgSo I woke up on Wednesday, March 7, and I saw that in addition to Tuesday’s Arctic temperatures, so low that weathermen warned that if you expose any bare flesh outside, you risked getting frostbite, that the sidewalks were buried in snow, and it was still falling. I again thought how lucky the New York Comic-Con organizers were that this didn’t happen during the weekend of the con. I wondered if I’d have trouble getting to a concert in Manhattan that night. Well, I thought, probably nothing worse would happen today.

And then I turned on my computer and learned that Captain America was dead.

The New York Daily News had just broken the story that morning, and not even The Beat or The Comics Reporter had it yet, but there are already pages of outraged posts at the John Byrne Forum, and it had been reported by CNN, among many other mainstream media outlets. Cap was apparently assassinated by a sniper in Captain America #25, which went on sale that very day (March 7).

Now I realize that this could be some elaborate fake-out. The mainstream media, unaware of how death in the superhero genre usually resembles a revolving door, fell hard for DC’s “Death of Superman” over a decade ago, and, of course, DC was not about to keep this iconic character dead.

Just as DC came up with four substitute Supermen to hold the fort until the real Superman returned, there will doubtless be one or more “new” Captain Americas. As Ron Hogan points out over at Galley Cat, this isn’t the first time Marvel has done that, and I can supply the details. Stan Lee (who wrote Cap longer than anyone else has) did it briefly in Tales of Suspense #96 in the 1960s; Steve Englehart had a kid named Roscoe take over as Captain America in the 1970s, and Mark Gruenwald had the “Super-Patriot” (now known as the U. S. Agent) become the new Cap in the 1980s. We’re overdue for another “new Cap” storyline. The difference is that each time in the past, Steve Rogers, the original Captain America, retired voluntarily from his costumed role before inevitably reassuming it later in the storyline.

Significantly, according to the Daily News, “Joe Quesada, 43, Marvel Entertainment’s editor in chief, said he wouldn’t rule out the shield-throwing champion’s eventual return.” In The New York Times (March 8, 2007) George Gene Gustines quotes Marvel publisher Dan Buckley saying about Cap, “He’s very dead right now.” Gustines also quotes some fans who don’t believe that the Captain is dead and terms their reactions “cynical,” but considering these statements from Marvel execs, isn’t their cynicism justified?

It turns out that in another comic currently on sale, Civil War: The Initiative #1, Ms. Marvel claims that Captain America is still alive. An official Marvel statement suggests that she may be mistaken or lying. Or is this an editorial mistake that lets the proverbial cat out of the bag?

On the other hand, ever since the demise of the Silver Age Flash in Crisis on Infinite Earths, readers have been all too aware that the Big Two superhero companies are perfectly willing to kill off superheroes for real and put some new character in as a permanent replacement. (Now it seems that the Silver Age Flash may finally return, but it took over twenty years!)

All of the previous “substitute Cap” stories have had the theme that Steve Rogers is irreplaceable as the true Captain America. My guess is that Marvel will indeed bring Rogers back as Cap. But I hope this isn’t just wishful thinking on my part. Gustines quotes another fan as saying “I’m fairly sure killing Cap with a movie in development (plus a possible Avengers flick on the way as well) would not be very sensible. So, I shall wait and see,” and praises him as “media-savvy.” And do we know for a fact that the Captain America in these movies is the original version from the 1940s?

The aforementioned Marvel official statement declares that “Captain America will continue to be published despite the very real death of Steve Rogers,” and concludes, “So, yes, Captain America, Steve Rogers, is dead.” Considering the miracles that are possible in the superhero genre, Rogers could still be truly “dead” and come back to life. But here Marvel seems to be hinting that they will create a new Captain America, one that they consider more relevant to the 21st century. It’s possible that Marvel might someday resurrect Rogers but not allow him to take back the role of Captain America from this newcomer.

The end of Civil War, in which Captain America decides he is wrong for fighting for the freedom of his fellow superheroes, and an already infamous Civil War: Frontline sequence in which a woman self-righteously denounces the Captain for knowing nothing about America since he doesn’t waste time on YouTube (Say what? I would think Cap keeps himself rather busy continually saving the lives of this woman and other Americans over the course of his career. This woman’s attitude smacks of ageism. This suggests that 21st century Marvel regards the original Captain as a dated character. “”˜He hasn’t been living in the modern world and the world does move,” says Marvel Editor-in-Chief Joe Quesada.” in the CNN report.

And here I think of Captain America as representing American ideals, which have endured for over two hundred years, just as I believe Lee, Englehart, and Gruenwald did. Just reading the better Captain America stories from the last four decades, such as theirs, demonstrates how the character consistently adapts to changing times. I’d feel better if CNN and the Daily News had quoted Marvel representatives as extolling the greatness of the original Captain America rather than seeing Marvel, in and out of the stories, badmouthing the character as irrelevant to 21st century America.

If Marvel was intent on killing off Captain America, why couldn’t the company have given him a heroic demise, like the one that Stan Lee and John Romita, Sr. gave Captain George Stacy in Amazing Spider-Man #90 (1970) or the one that Chris Claremont and John Byrne gave Phoenix in Uncanny X-Men #137 (1980). Even Mar-Vell’s demise from cancer in Jim Starlin’s The Death of Captain Marvel (1982) showed more courage and dignity than the ignominious killing of Captain America, arrested and handcuffed as a criminal for his role in Civil War.

Here are some quotations from the Daily News and CNN reports that struck me as telling.

“”˜What happens with the costume? And what happens to the characters that are friends and enemies of Cap?’ Quesada said with a smile. “˜You’re going to have to read the books to find out.'” (CNN)

“”˜I was shocked. I was not expecting it,’ said Gerry Gladston, co-owner of Midtown Comics in Manhattan. “˜I’d rather they didn’t kill him–but it’s going to mean great sales.'” (Daily News)

And here’s the sad one, from the Daily News: “”˜It’s a hell of a time for him to go. We really need him now,’ said co-creator Joe Simon, 93, after being informed of his brainchild’s death.” If this is all a fake-out to boost sales, I hope that somebody told Mr. Simon that’s all it is.

I will have much more to say about Civil War, though not until after finishing my coverage of this year’s New York Comic-Con, and probably my review of the 300 movie. And yes, I will buy and read Captain America #25 (if I still can find a copy at cover price), so Marvel’s sales stunt has worked. But I’m doing it out of a sense of duty as a comics historian. I feel no pleasure at the prospect of seeing Marvel kill off the embodiment of the American spirit, even if his demise proves to be only temporary. Marvel quickly undid the gouging out of Spider-Man’s eye (see “Comics in Context” #113), but that didn’t alter my distaste for that storyline. And if the rumor I heard during the New York Comic-Con proves to be true, even greater horrors await in the Marvel Universe.

It was only a year ago that New York Comic-Con audience, including myself, was happily photographing Joe Simon posing with an attendee dressed as Captain America (see “Comics in Context” #125). What questions might have been raised at panels at this year’s New York Comic-Con had we known what would happen to Captain America less than two weeks later?

For that matter, how has the spirit of Marvel, and of the superhero genre, changed since their Silver Age forty-some years ago? This year’s New York Comic-Con offered attendees the chance to judge for themselves by listening to the man who launched what he called the Marvel Age of Comics. And keep in mind, I record quotations to the best of my ability; I don’t make any of them up.

FRIDAY FEB. 23, 6:30 PM

cic2007-03-09-02.jpgThe panel in the Javits Center’s Special Events Hall was titled “Stan Lee: An American Icon,” and indeed he is. Roy Thomas, Stan’s protégé in the 1960s who succeeded him as editor in chief, was supposed to interview him onstage, but had to cancel his trip to New York at the last minute.

Roy’s replacement introduced himself to the audience: “I’m Joe Quesada of Marvel Comics, and let me say, I’m lucky to have a job.”

Quesada reminisced about how when he was a boy, he didn’t read comics but his father learned about Stan Lee’s groundbreaking anti-drug storyline in Amazing Spider-Man #96-98 (1971). Quesada’s father encouraged him to read these issues and, Quesada told us, “I really got hooked.” Quesada continued, “What my father didn’t realize was that he was starting a whole other addiction,” that he said ultimately cost more than cocaine.

In keeping with the “icon” theme, Quesada placed the Marvel Age’s founding father among some heavy company. “He is Elvis, he is the Beatles, he’s Bill Clinton,” declared Quesada, introducing Stan Lee to the vast audience.

But Stan was not there. To fill time, Quesada started reminiscing about being on stage with Lee and Kevin Smith a while back, and then Stan came down the aisle, waving to the crowd. Everyone stood and applauded, even the little kids seated in front of me, and there was loud cheering. “I wasn’t late!” Stan explained; “I was waiting for them to call me!”

Much as he clearly loves public adulation, perhaps there’s a part of Stan Lee that feels it’s a wee bit excessive. “You mean,” he asked Quesada, “I’ve come over here to answer questions for these people, who know more about us than we do?” Stan turned to the audience, and asked good-naturedly, “Don’t you guys have anything better to do?”

One thing that a lot of these guys were doing was massing in front of the stage, several rows deep, to take flash photographs of Stan the Man. THis is something that the convention organizers should have anticipated, but didn’t. Lee may indeed have been concerned, but he characteristically masked it with humor. “They’ve left us alone!” No security!” with “all these hostile people!” he exclaimed in mock panic. “I’m scared!” The audience laughed, as he surely intended.

“Do you feel the love in the room?” Quesada asked him.

Finally the cavalry arrived, and Stan was relieved. “Oh, security,” he observed, and then warned the audience, “You better watch out. We got a guy in a red shirt here!”

Quesada asked him about his long career at Marvel. “Before I came up with the Fantastic Four,” Lee replied, “the comic book industry was a cultural wasteland.” That’s really not much of an exaggeration, but Lee nonetheless apologized for his characteristic hyperbole. “You have to forgive me. It’s been a tough day. I refuse to be serious.”

Then Lee continued his familiar story of what seems to have been a creative midlife crisis, and the turning point both in his career and the history of comics. Lee said that “The great thing about it”–comics–“was working with the greatest artists and writers.” But, referring to Martin Goodman without naming him, Lee explained that “Unfortunately our publisher thought comics were read by little kids or illiterate adults.” Lee claimed his unnamed publisher even decreed that he could not use words of more than three syllables. Dissatisfied with these restrictions, “Finally I was ready to quit.” Then he added, self-deprecatingly, “I make slow decisions. I was 40 years old when I said that.” (Actually, he was 39, which is close enough.) But “Then I did The Fantastic Four and everything changed.” Lee told us that he even used words of more than three syllables in the comics!

“I think at that point the books said Atlas Publications,” Stan recalled. Actually, Goodman’s line of comics had dropped the title “Atlas,” and if you look at the cover of Fantastic Four #1 or The Incredible Hulk #1, you’ll see no company name listed. But Stan’s real point was that he thought the company needed a catchier, more memorable title, “so I came up with Marvel.” (Though he didn’t mention it, this appropriately came from the title of the company’s first superhero comic, Marvel Comics #1, published in 1939.) This name, Stan pointed out, lent itself to slogans like “Make Mine Marvel!” and “the Marvel Age of Comics.” “You see how corny I am,” he confided to the crowd.

Even though Lee has done work for DC in recent years, it is clear that feelings linger from the old days, when Marvel’s rival so thoroughly dominated the comics market. Stan told the audience that back in the 1960s DC “called itself National Comics.” Observing Marvel’s success since it took on its new name, Lee continued, National “decided to change their name,” too. So, he said, they “hired a professional name change company,” which “labored for weeks” to come up with just the right new name. And, after all this herculean labor, Stan told us, “they came up with DC.” And Stan was and remains unimpressed. “Make Mine DC!? My God!”

Quesada told Lee that “One thing that got me hooked” on Marvel Comics, “besides the great stories was the sense of community,” and Quesada talked about what he called “this magnificent world of artists and writer” that Stan dubbed the Marvel Bullpen. Ah, yes, the sense of community at Marvel. I remember that from my time there in the 1980s and early 1990s, before most of my friends and I all got bounced.

Lee then praised Quesada and “every idea this guy comes up with,” especially Civil War to tumultuous applause. Quesada demurred, saying that Civil War wasn’t his idea. Lee retorted that “The great thing about being editor in chief us you can take credit for everything! I’ve been doing it for years!”

Then, more seriously, Lee said, “I get so much credit,” but that “a lot of it should go to Jack Kirby, Steve Ditko, John Romita, John Buscema,” and he added other names from Marvel’s Silver Age as the audience applauded.

Then Lee explained that “You can draw a script in a hundred different ways,” but success in visual storytelling “depends on where you put a closeup, where you put a long shot.” Stan continued, “A guy like Kirby could not draw a dull panel.” Lee said that his artists were “like the finest directors” in movies. “If it wasn’t for these talented artists, I wouldn’t be sitting here getting these nice things said [to me] by Joe Quesada.”

Quesada ventured, “There has to be a ringmaster.”

Knowing a straight line when he heard one, Lee replied, “Of course, it’s all due to me,” and the audience burst into laughter.

The crowd got it. When Stan Lee appears in public, there are actually two Stans on view. One is his over-the-top public persona, and the audience recognized he was doing it ironically, as a self-created comedy character, mocking his own ego, and they loved it. Then, every so often, Stan lets the mask slip, and you see a more serious, generous Stan Lee, as when he graciously praised his many collaborators. And the audience loved this Stan, as well.

As I wrote last week, I missed seeing Stephen Colbert at the con earlier that day. Colbert has created for himself a brilliantly funny public persona, trusting his audience to understand and appreciate his masterful use of irony. And Stan Lee has done much the same thing, and like Colbert, devised a comic persona that has won him a loyal and enthusiastic following.

Quesada asked Lee to explain how he went about collaboration.

“When I first thought of Spider-Man,” Lee began, ” I wanted Jack Kirby to do it.” Stan said he told Kirby, “I wanted a teenager with the power of a spider who can climb up walls. And I said, “˜But, Jack, don’t make him look like Captain America. You know how you like to draw these heroic guys with big muscles. I want him to be just this little, wimpy kid, just like anybody.'” So Kirby drew the character, “and it looked like a young Captain America,” Stan told us. “I thought Steve Ditko had the kind of style that might be better.” So it was Ditko who drew the kind of Spider-Man that Lee was looking for. “That’s how important the art style is.”

With regard to working with Ditko, Stan told us, “With Spider-Man I did the first plot by myself, [and] probably the second plot. Then Steve Ditko made suggestions,” Lee continued. “Probably by the twentieth issue he was doing the plotting.”

This Lee was explaining how the “Marvel method” of creating stories worked, and how he could give a story his personal style even if someone else had plotted it. “When I wrote the copy,” he said, meaning the dialogue and captions, “I could give it the style.” Indeed, Lee revealed that he enjoyed having the artists do plotting: “It made it more fun for me,” he said, because “the pages would be a surprise.” Then “I would change it,” meaning the story, “in the writing.”

In “Stan Lee: A Retrospective,” the show I co-curated at the Museum of Comic and Cartoon Art, we have a good example of this. We have a page from Fantastic Four Annual #3, in which, according to the notes he made in the border, Kirby intended that Doctor Doom was raging because the Thing had crushed his hands in a previous story. In his dialogue Lee altered Doom’s motivation, having him instead seethe with fury over his previous defeats by Reed Richards. This more clearly motivates Doom’s attempt in the annual to wreck Richards’ wedding to Susan Storm.

Turning to his work with Kirby, Lee asserted that “I came up with Galactus,” but when Kirby sent him the pages for Fantastic Four #48, “All of a sudden I see a naked nut on a surfboard, and I said “What’s that?'” This was, of course, the character we now know as the Silver Surfer. “Jack said, “˜Well, I figure anybody as powerful as Galactus… he ought to have a herald who goes ahead of him….'” Stan added, “And to Jack it was just a throwaway character.””

Lee perceived, “There was a certain nobility to” the Surfer. “Jack drew him in such a way that he looked like the goodest [sic] person who ever lived, and I tried to write him that way.” Lee confessed, “I sort of fell in love with the character.” Lee said he then had the Surfer appear in further issues, and came to think of him as his character. “I sort of feel the Silver Surfer is mine because Jack just tossed it away.”

Lee declared he was engaged in a “real collaborative process” with such artists and that “I didn’t know what they were going to bring me.” He added, “Because I was doing all the writing, I could keep the style consistent.”

Lee then explained that “you want to write a story in such a way that you’re talking to the reader.” Working on “Stan Lee: A Retrospective,” I realized just how important Stan’s narration is. Nowadays, narration and captions have fallen out of favor in superhero comic books, except when a character is narrating his own adventure. But Stan used captions, not in the guise of an anonymous, omniscient narrator, but as the voice of the storyteller, who spoke in Stan’s distinctive manner, reaching out to the readers, creating a bond of community with them.

Returning to the subject of working with Ditko, Stan revealed, “I think Steve made up the idea of Spider-Man shooting webs.” Lee maintained, “I wanted him crawling walls, [and] super-strong. I came up with the web-shooters idea.”

It turns out that Ditko claimed in a 1965 interview that he himself came up with the “web gimmick on wrist.” But in a 1988 interview an artist named Eric Stanton, who shared a studio with Ditko in the 1960s, claimed, “I think I added the business about the webs coming out of his hands“.

Who’s right? In 1962, when Lee and Ditko created Spider-Man, neither of them imagined how successful the character would become. So how likely was either one to remember precisely who came up with what? And now, forty-five years later, memories may have blurred even further. What impresses me is that Stan gave Ditko credit for the idea of Spider-Man shooting webs; who came up with the idea of the actual web-shooter devices seems less important (and, after all, both the Spider-Man movies and comics have now disposed of them as nonessential).

Taken with Lee’s description of how his collaborations worked, Quesada observed, it’s “like [the] jazz composition idea.” “Yeah,” Stan enthusiastically agreed, “like riffs.”

Next Quesada asked who was responsible for the “soap opera quality” and “cliffhangers” in Marvel stories.

Stan replied quietly, “It was me.” Then he explained, with undisguised practicality, “It’s a lot easier to take one plot and keep it going for a lot of issues.” Moreover, “and in those days I was writing all the stories! So it made it easier for me.” Then, in a confidential manner, Stan advised the audience, “I’m going to give you a real philosophical theory you can keep with you the rest of your life. You will find that some of the most creative decisions in life are made because of laziness and selfishness.” The audience laughed, and Quesada commented, “That’s good.”

Next Quesada asked if Lee had had any idea that the characters he co-created would become as successful as they have.

“If someone said you’ll be at a convention talking to people with nothing better to do, at in a million years,” replied Stan. “We were hoping the books would sell, so we wouldn’t lose our jobs and could pay the rent. If someone said you’ll be talking at conventions to people with nothing better to do, and that Tobey Maguire and Nic Cage and Robert Downey Jr. would be starring in movies based on what we were doing. . . .we would’ve said, “˜You’re drunk! No way!'”

“Did you think you’d do better than DC?” Quesada inquired.

“Oh, yes!” answered Stan. “I read DC books. There was no way they could compete with us!” And the audience laughed.

More seriously, Lee explained, “I felt they were in the wrong track. For example, in the Batman books most if the stories were detective stories. There was never any personal problem in Batman’s life. . . .We were concentrating on how can Spider-Man get enough money to pay for Aunt May.”

Lee explained that he and his collaborators “would try to get into the personal life of these characters, and I knew that that was better.”

It seems so obvious how Marvel in the 1960s differed from DC, but by Stan’s account, DC just couldn’t figure it out. Lee said, “We hoped they would never discover” what made Marvel comics sell. He told us that he had sources at DC, just as they did at Marvel, so he heard what they were up to.

“They wondered when our books started to outsell theirs,” Lee said. “They decided it was because you [Marvel] use more dialogue on your covers. I said next month, no dialogue on covers.” And of course, he continued, Marvel still outsold them. “They had another meeting,” Lee recounted, at which they decided “Marvel uses more red on their covers,” so when Stan heard this, he decreed that Marvel wouldn’t use red on the next month’s covers, and Marvel still sold better. This “went on and on,” Stan stated, “and I liked it that way!”

But what would Stan Lee have liked to do if he hadn’t been a success in comics?

Considering Stan’s skill as a public performer, it should not come as a surprise that, as he told us, “When I was young I wanted to be an actor.” In fact, as a teenager during the Great Depression. Lee was a member of the Federal Theatre Project, sponsored by the government’s Works Projects Administration (WPA). “I was on the stage. Orson Welles was a member, too. But he was in another locale.” However, Lee told us, “It didn’t pay anything. Comics paid more.” Stan concluded, “I should’ve stayed in it. I could’ve been Brad Pitt!”

Of course now Stan found himself a stage performing for an audience. He told us, “You don’t know what a good feeling this is. You’re a captive audience. I can say anything! My wife won’t even listen to me.”

Here’s something else that isn’t as surprising as it may first seem: Stan Lee also wanted to work in advertising. “I treated all of Marvel Comics like a big ad campaign,” he told the audience, and mentioned how he came up with “catchphrases” for Marvel like “‘Nuff said!” and “Excelsior!”

But, Stan claimed, if he hadn’t been in comics, “I would’ve starved.” He “wanted to write the Great American Novel,” he wanted to be an actor, and he wanted to be in advertising, but he conceded that each of these “wouldn’t have worked.”

Returning to the subject of comics, Stan spoke about his relationship with Marvel readers at a time when the world did not take comic books seriously: “We had an inside joke that no one else understood.”

So it seemed appropriate that Lee and Quesada started serenading the audience with the theme song for Marvel’s 1960s official fan club, the Merry Marvel Marching Society, whose very name is a joke. The audience, in the palm of Stan’s hand, applauded enthusiastically. Stan wrote the song, and Quesada complimented him, “Those are darn good lyrics.”

But Stan can do more than write jingles. He then told us that he once write a poem, titled “God Woke.” (In fact, there is a copy of the poem on display in “Stan Lee: A Retrospective,” and it will be published later this year in the book Stan Lee: Conversations, from the University Press of Mississippi.) “Someone read it,” Stan continued, and “believe it or not, we’re working on a major motion picture based on “˜God Woke.”’

FRIDAY FEB. 23, 8:30 PM

Stan mentioned this at the opening of “Stan Lee: A Retrospective” later that night, and he seems genuinely astonished and delighted about that “God Woke” may become a movie. Here’s something else that years ago he could never have imagined happening.

The opening was a great success and, I’m happy to say, one of the highlights of my life in comics. All of us present excitedly watched as Stan went through the show, frequently surprised and, it seems, genuinely thrilled at the many original art pages and artifacts we had found from his lengthy career. He was excited when I showed him the copy of “God Woke” in our exhibit. We also had a copy of Esquire from the 1960s that had a feature article about Marvel on display on the bottom shelf of a display case. Stan actually lay down on the floor to get a better look, but we need not have worried, because the Man got back on his feet without difficulty.

Several veterans of 20th century Marvel were present, including Danny Fingeroth, Steve Saffel, Jim Salicrup and myself. It was disappointing that present day Marvel chose not to send a representative to the opening. But I felt the museum was alive and suffused with the true spirit of Marvel Comics on this memorable night.

Would that all of us could live to see the kind of success and appreciation that Stan Lee has deservedly received after his long, groundbreaking career. Perhaps the manga invasion of the last several years still would have happened, but I doubt that there would be an American comics industry today if not for the revolution Stan Lee spearheaded in the 1960s. He is Marvel’s true Captain, still going strong, still an inspiration. His familiar personal motto is “Excelsior!”, a Latin word meaning “higher” or “Ever upward!” and that encapsulates the classic Marvel spirit, something we still need today.

ADVERTISEMENTS FOR MYSELF

Recently Marvel has sent me two handsome new reprint volumes: a new hardcover edition of Neil Gaiman’s Marvel 1602, for which I wrote an introduction, and the massive and expensive Daredevil Omnibus Vol. 1, a compilation of Frank Miller’s early work with the character, including an interview that I did with Miller and his collaborator Klaus Janson back in 1981. I also wrote the 1980s Official Handbook of the Marvel Universe entries on the Kingpin (definitely: I remember discussing it with Frank before I wrote it) and Elektra (probably: it reads like my work) that are included in the back of the book!

Of course I also hope any of you passing through New York City between now and July will visit “Stan Lee: A Retrospective” at the Museum of Comic and Cartoon Art (www.moccany.org)!

Copyright 2007 Peter Sanderson

Trailer Park: Premiere Magazine is Dead. Long Live Premiere.

Filed under: Columns,Trailer Park — admin @ 3:45 am

By Christopher Stipp

Archives? Right Here…

We begin today with a quotation:

My ashes, as the phoenix, may bring forth
A bird that will revenge upon you all:
And in that hope I throw mine eyes to heaven,
Scorning whate’er you can afflict me with.
3 Henry VI (1.4.35-8)

For those who need a little more context this essentially says, “Ha-Ha.”

Not just a Nelson “Ha-Ha” but a hearty Bob and Doug McKenzie, blow a couple of bullets from your nose, kind of “Ha-Ha.”

I normally don’t take too much satisfaction in pointing out the demise of a periodical that I bought on a consistent basis and enjoyed the hell out of for simply the level of respect given to the medium.

I can’t stand, and if you’ve digested the various magazines devoted to movie making and the business of film you know where I’m coming from, when pundits who have too much time and too readily an access to a thesaurus want to appear to have the linguistic arsenal to deconstruct a movie while championing obsequious movies that neither you nor I will ever the time, or temperament, to watch.

But, really, I have a bad case of schadenfreude and it filled me with utter delight to see that Premiere magazine is no longer printing any more issues.

Sure, this story would be different if certain things never happened but they did and there isn’t anything that can change that the very same man who wrote me this note is now in the unemployment line.

Dear Mr. Stipp:As the editor in chief of Premiere, I was completely unaware of any conversations you may have had with Jessica Letkemann. Our Trailer Stash online feature grew out of Tom Roston’s “Notes From The Dream Factory” column in Premiere’s Jan/Feb 2007 issue about movie trailers. The editorial department thought it would be a good idea to extend the concept to premiere.com, and so Trailer Stash was born. As a former freelancer, I sympathize with how you feel, but I can assure you that none of us on the magazine side of Premiere had any idea that you were doing this sort of column or that you had talked to premiere.com about it.

I hope we can work together in the future.

All the best,
Peter Herbst
Editor-in-Chief, Premiere

But, in the end, even a legal boilerplate response to my inquiries as to why I believed something so lame like a trailer column could be boosted like a pack of Chicklets in a 7-11 wouldn’t prevent the progress of karma.

It is, however, a hollow victory because, like I mentioned, I actually bought the magazine. I loved the balance it struck between film criticism and puffy journalism; I mean, really, a Day In The Life of an Extra? I’m not pointing fingers as to what could have went wrong for these fine, upstanding people but any story that wants to sing a swan song for the little engine that couldn’t only need to look over their shoulder and see how magazines like Empire in the UK are managing to increase their market share while evolving with their audience.

In fact, one of the contributing issues about why this once mighty mag has taken it on the chin is its inability to adapt to the marketplace. I know, for some, the talk of how to monetize a property is about as exciting as watching an episode of The Simple Life but take a look at one publication, Advertising Age, had to say about the harbingers of doom that led to this moment:

Premiere’s paid circulation has declined slowly over the years, from an average of 616,089 in 1995 to 492,498 in the second half of last year, according to Harrington Associates and the Audit Bureau of Circulations. Even more ominous, Premiere sold 24.7% fewer ad pages in 2006 than it did the year before, according to the Publishers Information Bureau.

I know, as a salesperson, having to go out and hustle ad space isn’t easy, especially when you can’t show an advertiser a return-on-investment figure that would make it appealing to them to open up their checkbook. They never really messed with the formula that got them to where they would eventually die on their feet and, I would posit, that’s exactly what’s wrong with traditional “old media” types nowadays.

You can’t just expect for people to be satiated with getting all their awesome, super cool information in a monthly digest. It’s simply not as relevant as the Internet, certainly not as fast, and that’s what’s killing me when I see geezers think that to stay true to what worked in the past will always work in the future. Premiere had no significant web presence in the way of exclusive material, no outreach online to other web entities, a site that looked like it was crafted by a 2nd year computer science major and a shocking disdain to incorporate any of these things as a last ditch effort to save what was left of their publishing shell.

Since I’m not the one walking to Premiere’s HQ with a stogie in my mouth, walking into a well-lit office, surrounded by neophyte sycophants who tell me that every idea is a great idea I can’t say what was going on in the last throes of this magazine’s life. I do know, though, that stubbornness to take an excellent brand that most would kill for to the next level is appalling and, in the end, they self-destructed their print publication with the kind of panache that’s usually reserved for the “thump-thump” of a fast moving squirrel that’s eaten by the underside of some Firestones that are strapped onto an H3. For that, huzzah, good fellows, you’ve done well in not figuring out how to stay afloat and viable.

It’s hard for me not to care about the great pieces that came out of Premiere’s camp but it’s easy, real easy, not to just a laugh a little on the inside based on the buckets of vitriol I have for the poor way they choose to do business. They would do well in seeing this as a new opportunity and a chance to embrace the ways to be inventive on the Internet, without cribbing too much from those who have been here longer and possess a little more class.
KNOCKED UP (2007)

Director: Judd Apatow
Cast:
Katherine Heigl, Seth Rogen, Paul Rudd, Leslie Mann, Jason Segel
Release: June 1, 2007
Synopsis:
Allison Scott (Heigl) is an up-and-coming entertainment journalist whose 24-year-old life is on the fast track. But it gets seriously derailed when a drunken one-nighter with slacker Ben Stone (Rogen) results in an unwanted pregnancy. Faced with the prospect of going it alone or getting to know the baby’s father, Allison decides to give the lovable doof a chance.

An overgrown kid who has no desire to settle down, Ben learns that he has a big decision to make with his kid’s mom-to-be: will he hit the road or stay in the picture? Courting a woman you’ve just Knocked Up, however, proves to be a little difficult when the two try their hands at dating. As they discover more about one another, it becomes painfully obvious that they’re not the soul mates they’d hoped they might be.

View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Negative; I Am Not Drinking The Populist Kool-Aid On This. This could either be an unmitigated disaster or this could be the one comedy you could actually con your old lady into seeing.

One of the biggest issues, though, I had with this trailer is that by the end of this thing you’re not quite sure of whether this is going to be filled with the same raucous and raunchy comedy we all came to know and love from THE 40 YEAR OLD VIRGIN or if this is going to be VIRGIN-lite; however, I’m feeling it’s more of the latter.

The opening of this trailer is mediocre and kind of vanilla. I’m not so much taking contention with the pacing, we’re whisked right into Katherine Heigl’s place in this movie, we’re led to believe that Allison (or Alison with one “L” as IMDB and the trailer seem a bit conflicted about what was written on her fictitious birth certificate) is some homely PA who is getting her chance to be in front of the camera. Before we have any other idea of who the hell this chick is or why we should try and comprehend what’s going on we go over to the much more interesting Ben character who is knocking out some homey into a dank pool and getting his swerve on as a pathetic looking bachelor with no future. Harold Ramis’ presence doesn’t really provide anything more than just extra context with the idea that Ben is a gimp with no prospects in life.

This is where we all can see everything that’s about to happen and, thus, rendering the first fifteen or so minutes of this movie essentially pointless; David Mamet had some things to say about filmmaking where you could walk into a film way after it’s started and still get what’s going on and it wasn’t complimentary. 40 YEAR OLD VIRGIN excelled because right from the word “go” Carell was inordinately interesting and pathetic. Let’s hope that the same is the case here.

What’s more alarming is that the moment we get to sample from the film where we’re given an extended scene is where Ben’s friend hits on Allison’s friend who happens to be married. It’s excruciating because you’re expecting something funny to come out of this, obviously it was put there for a reason, but the big “pay-off” just hangs there like a stale fart.

“Eight Weeks Later”

And this is still not funny! Everything that’s come out of Ben’s mouth isn’t amusing, his one-night-stand turned impregnated lady isn’t interesting, and this whole set-up is taking way too long. I actually suffer from the shakes in the sheer terror that this flick is going to be a turkey, that it’s not as quick with the funny as its predecessor.

It’s not until we get ¾’s of the way through things where I wish I had a CUT AND PASTE option for myself. It’s here, only here, where we actually begin not to laugh but to actually feel like we’re given an actual movie to be sold on. I don’t why in God’s sacred name we’re given a Traveling Wilburys ditty, it’s kind of disconcerting in an Odd Choice sort of way, but Seth’s actions from this point actually pump life into what could-be for this movie. Treating his girlfriend’s children like pets when he plays with them? Funny. Paul Rudd’s distillation of what marriage is actually like? A little fetid with all that we know marriage is not but it’s still amusing. Katherine’s meltdown in the delivery room? Um, I think we all agree that we’ve seen this before and it was funny the first few dozen times we’ve been exposed to the joke.

“”¦And how grown-ups are born.”

And the Voice-Over Guy? Completely cheesy in every way and acts like a harbinger of how un-VIRGIN this movie looks like it’s going to be. Buyer beware.

THE KINGDOM (2007)

Director: Peter Berg
Cast: Jamie Foxx, Chris Cooper, Jennifer Garner, Jason Bateman, Jeremy Piven, Danny Huston, Richard Jenkins
Release: April 20, 2007
Synopsis: Foxx stars as whip-smart FBI Special Agent Ronald Fleury, who has just received the assignment of his career: assemble an elite team (played by Jennifer Garner, Chris Cooper and Jason Bateman) and go to Riyadh to hunt down and capture the terrorist mastermind behind a deadly attack on Americans working in Saudi Arabia. The feds have only one week to infiltrate and cripple a cell bent on jihad to western society.

No training could prepare Fleury and his team for the disorienting culture shock they face once inside this scorching foreign land–a byzantine maze of profiteering politicians and storefront terrorists. Bound by handlers who refuse to play ball with the U.S., the agents quickly find the local law enforcement more hindrance than help and soon grow uncertain of anybody’s allegiance.

But when a sympathetic Saudi police captain helps them navigate Riyadh politics and investigate the true cause of the attack, Fleury finds an unexpected comrade-in-arms. In their lightning fast attempt to crack the case, the partners’ search leads them straight to the killers’ front door. Now in a fight for their own lives, two teams on opposite sides of the war on terror won’t stop until justice is found in The Kingdom.

View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Positive. Don’t be fooled, Americans, THE KINGDOM was filmed right here in Phoenix.

I find this bit amusing and I can’t figure out why. There have been other locations that have doubled as something else but the fact that they’ve passing off the Middle East for a freeway I travel almost every day just makes me laugh a lit on the inside. For a little bit of realism, check this out and let the truth run free.

We open up to people playing a rousing game of softball as we’re told it’s the Western Housing Compound, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Again, it’s not. It’s Arizona. In fact, a lot of these places look oddly familiar to me.

So, as a whole lot of people are playing the game we get some gunshots and then even a drive-by mixing things up, and I think you could easily mistake this red herring for an assassination as I think it was done to probably to help the visitors feel like they were back in LA. Anyway, they go with the whole assassin thing, detonating a large explosive device, it’s a pretty sweet looking explosion too, done in broad daylight so you can really make out the grey plumes and orange punch of flame, and we get a really awkward exchange between Jamie Foxx and his on-screen kid. The young’n says he’s not one of the bad guys and the kid retorts that he isn’t either. Ok, so what? Were we to assume that Foxx is some kind of lethal dude but it’s OK to help kill other people so long as your sanctioned by the Gub-Ment of the US of A? The message is a but muddled there.

Props for the trailer just quickly whipping through the introductions of Jason Bateman (Good for him getting so much more work), Jennifer Garner and Chris Cooper; we’re given a taste and that’s all that’s needed at this point.

“It’s a bit like Mars.” This is a line that Cooper has as we’re into the thick of this murder investigation that’s being headed by these government employees when he describes what it’s like in Saudi Arabia and all I have to say is wow. He not only nailed SA but AZ as well; you do not even realize.

Things kick up an even greater notch as we get that instrumental music, a lot of drums banging and the tempo is just like an accelerator pedal pushed down to the floor, with expediency being the order of the day here. It seems that there is a lot of politicking here, let’s hope this doesn’t become another solid, but real slow on the action, SYRIANA which could happen. The one saving grace is that Peter Berg is behind the wheel so there is some hope here.

We get more music, more action here and there, and the next thing you know we’re back in Arizona with these guys driving on my freeway; sorry, it just takes me completely out of the moment. However, I am really digging on where we’re going. It seems this Cat and Mouse movie wants to live up to the idea of moving forward and being smart about it as well. You just sense it. Even as we get a shoulder fired RPG, coming out of a wicked attack scene, I am completely on board for this ride.

Oh yeah, a car flips over near the very end of this thing. I think I passed that mile marker a few times last week on my way back from work in Scottsdale.

I THINK I LOVE MY WIFE (2007)

Director: Chris Rock
Cast:
Chris Rock, Kerry Washington, Gina Torres, Steve Buscemi
Release: March 16, 2007
Synopsis: I THINK I LOVE MY WIFE, written, directed by and starring Chris Rock, is a sophisticated comedy about marriage and the lure of a new love. Nikki (Kerry Washington) is the exciting free spirit who makes Richard’s (Chris Rock) daydreams come true while Richard’s wife Brenda (Gina Torres) is so preoccupied with her own career and raising their two children that she has little time for her husband.

View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Awful. At the beginning I’m on-board for all the usual trappings of a comedy; somehow, sometimes, I wonder if there is just any other way to open a 1st person movie without having to resort to Voiceover Guy or narration from our protagonist. Que sera sera.

So, we get Rock explaining how awesome his life is. He chats up his wife of seven years. This actually helps us kind of understand what this movie is going to explore. The woman isn’t a shrew, isn’t looking to rip his wang off at any opportunity and doesn’t seem like the kind of gal looking to cuckold him. So, what’s the big reveal?

They’re bored with each other.

So, how do we proceed from here? It’s disconcerting that the trailer makers go to En Vogue’s old-school “My Lovin'” as it kind of feels like it was done for ethic and not esthetic sakes. I guess turnabout is still fair play but, people, the song is really old and I’ve taken contention with this trick on more than one occasion. However, we press on with the idea of how to make a 7-year itch go away without it seeming like a stupid, vapid insult to our collective intelligence.

We take two steps back with the trailer when Rock proposes to buy his wife some suggestive undergarments only for her to grab the granny panties in typical form. Simple question, if his marriage was so awesome then why did he say it was at the beginning if his wife doesn’t want anything to do with sex? It’s rhetorical but logistically valid I think considering how everything starts.

Now, Rock meets an old friend in the process of purchasing the panties in question and the friend not only is still hot but flashes him a nice smile and her soon-to-be-purchased see-through thongs. No, nothing could come out of that, right?

Right. Rock asks us all, like we’re in the pitch meeting with him, What would it be like to be single again? (Gasps everywhere) The problem with this question and, consequently, this trailer is that we switch allegiances. Not a good thing if you want me to follow what you’re saying.

At first Rock seems like he’s the protagonist with the problem that needs working out, he’s living in a pressure cooker of a life that seems long gone from his days as a bachelor, but then he becomes the possible cheater, thereby, switching any good will we have for him and his family to his wife who, possibly, shows her love throughout the film. This ancillary storyline about this past friend fucking up the works with her hotness and flirtiness just serves to confuse. And if you don’t believe this theory just listen to the slow soul soundtrack that plays behind his wife as she’s near tears wondering where in hell her husband is at and tell me there isn’t something happening.

The premise seems like almost perfunctory to the larger issue of what to do about staleness in a marriage. That you can’t look and fantasize about other ladies seems to be, somewhat, at the crux of this but it’s all very scattered and, I posit, the message is lost somewhere in this trailer.

OCEANS THIRTEEN (2007)

Director: Steven Soderbergh
Cast: George Clooney, Matt Damon, Brad Pitt, Ellen Barkin, Al Pacino, Casey Affleck, Scott Caan, Don Cheadle, Andy Garcia, Elliott Gould, Bernie Mac, Carl Reiner
Release: June 13, 2007
Synopsis: In the new sequel to Ocean’s Eleven and Ocean’s Twelve, the cast is reunited with director Steven Soderbergh and producer Jerry Weintraub. Joining the cast for the new adventure are Al Pacino and Ellen Barkin.

View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Love It. I absolutely hate it, and I realize that in an era where Hitler exterminated millions of people in the name of his own insanity that hate is strong word not to be used flippantly, but I hate it when I have to endure a long, wordy, opening for a trailer.

It doesn’t help me understand the movie, I feel it’s lazy and self-indulgent of the trailer makers to do it and I am loathe to even try and figure out what in the hell I’m listening to when I don’t understand the context.

I love this long, wordy opening.

Since I’m familiar with this OCEAN’S franchise, as are a lot of you, we kind of all “get” what Pacino, who looks back to form in some regard here, is saying as we open on a large, sweeping vista of Vegas (Best city in the world for Boozin’ and Losin’, IMHO), is saying as he describes the kind of hurt he wants to put on Danny Ocean and crew. We don’t need to know much but because we know he’s talking to Clooney and because we all know what kind of a rabbit turd OCEANS 12 was so we know it couldn’t get worse than that I am willing to say that Clooney really shines as well with his witty retort back to Al.

Now, since this is teaser, the name of this game is time and I feel that the teaser takes a bit of a misstep when, in the scene following the first one, we have George kind of hint at what this job is going to be as Brad Pitt gives his one of his own “O” faces.

I do like, however, the sweeping montage of disguises that our guys are going to don this time out. While it’s not riveting or engaging it certainly makes for a smile when you can see Don Cheadle as the closest thing I’ll see to a black Elvis this year.

I’m glad that Casey Affleck and Scott Caan are back for reasons that should be clear when you watch the first entry into the series; they are really the pivotal goofballs that make watching OCEAN’S 11 more than just a casual comedy. They’re weird, we’re not given a shred of back-story, yet they’re just amusing to look at.

The other thing that makes this teaser note-worthy is its ending with Andy Garcia. I didn’t know what to make of him standing in front of the mirror, looking all pimp, with Clooney asking if he’s ready, to do what we have no idea but who gives a fuck, and as soon as Garcia says he was born ready it is Clooney’s eye-rolling that seals the deal for me. It’s subtle, funny and makes me eager to see what this job will entail.

Keneteph’s Korner: The Real (Emcee) Juice

Filed under: Columns,Keneteph's Korner — UncaScroogeMcD @ 3:31 am
keneteph.gif
The Real (Emcee) Juice

keneteph2007-03-09-01.jpgMany don’t know about a phenomenal emcee by out of Chicago by the name of Juice. This is not to be confused with DJ Ju-Ice out of Jersey, or any other rappers (like the one Game signed), with the same name. THIS Juice has established himself as one of the best freestyle lyricists in HipHop. He has beaten mainstream rappers Common, and even Eminem in a 1997 battle called The Scribble Jam. Both rappers have publicly admitted to being defeated by Juice in battles. He has also been featured on Sway and King Tech’s Wake Up Show in Los Angeles, and has constantly impressed them with his freestyle skills.

Despite his success he is not signed to a major label, but because of his own determination to advance HipHop, he continues to make lyrical innovations and stretch his abilities. On the path of a lyricist, he’s also had to prove himself to HipHop fans and artists alike, who have doubted his skills and said his freestyles were pre-written. He always shows and proves, but is now focusing on putting songs together, instead of freestyling. He released a full length CD of songs called All Bets Off in 2005. Explaining when he decided to start writing, Juice said, “I realized when it came to rap, artists who are good at freestyling usually aren’t good at writing lyrics, and artists who write songs can’t freestyle worth a shit. Even though I was accused of writing my freestyles, I actually wanted to master song writing and put concepts together.”

keneteph2007-03-09-03.jpg

keneteph2007-03-09-02.jpgThe independent artist has his own label, Conglomerate Music Corp, and has formed his own group, called Juice and the Machine. The Machine is made up of various musicians who play his tracks live. They have a CD out from a live show they did at a club called The Party, which comes with a DVD of the same show. The Live from the Party CD/DVD is put together by Bandit Productions and The Conglomerate Music Corp., and is SLAMMING!!! Juice and the Machine bring out how HipHop should sound. It’s a mixture of songs and freestyles, and when Juice freestyles, it’s like the band freestyles with him in musical melody. I was even more impressed when I found out the band only practiced twice before the show!! Juice said he formed a band to further establish himself as an artist. “People seem to see you as more credible and take to you more if you have a live band with you. I got fans who say they don’t like Rap, but like my music because of the universal appeal.” The CD/DVD can be purchased on the Bandit Productions website.

Juice says his main goal with his music is to stay successful as an independent artist, and break a few stereotypes some fans have about underground artists. “Just because an artist is underground, doesn’t mean they can’t be well off. Some fans think if an artist is well off and not struggling, it means they’ve lost their underground musical flair. That’s not the case at all – actually a lot of underground cats are more well off and have more money in their pocket than some of these mainstream artists who claim to have money.”

keneteph2007-03-09-04.jpg

QUICK STOP EXCLUSIVE: For those who would like to hear Juice’s freestyle skills, we have two freestyles he did for Quick Stop Entertainment. The first one he did after I gave him three phrases to put in the verse; “Kenneth Plume,” “Kevin Smith,” and “Quick Stop Entertainment.” Due to my shitty phone connection he thought I said “Quick South,” but I’m sure you’ll forgive him. This is the freestyle he left on my voice mail after we hung up.

DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
Juice Freestyle #1 (MP3 format) ““ 1 MB

The second is actually a freestyle interview. This is the first of its kind, where I asked Juice five questions – he had no idea I would ask beforehand, then he freestyled the answers. Now, you got a distinction from other rappers who call themselves “Juice” and “The Real Juice” – kind of like how back in the day there was the Ghostbusters cartoon, then another copy cat cartoon came out, so the first Ghostbusters cartoon changed it’s name to The Real Ghostbusters.

DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
Juice Freestyle #2 (MP3 format) ““ 9.94 MB

Quick Stop Entertainment’s always bringing the good shit for that iPod!!

keneteph2007-03-09-05.jpg

Copyright 2007 Keneteph Entertainment

Weekend Shopping Guide 3/9/07: Make Sexy Time In Closet

Filed under: Shopping Guides — UncaScroogeMcD @ 2:59 am
weekendshopping.jpg

The weekend’s here. You’ve just been paid, and it’s burning a hole in your pocket. What’s a pop culture geek to do? In hopes of steering you in the right direction to blow some of that hard-earned cash, it’s time for the Quick Stop Weekend Shopping Guide – your spotlight on the things you didn’t even know you wanted…

Anyone who thought that South Park was even close to running out of steam as it entered its 9th season (Paramount, Not Rated, DVD-$49.98 SRP) need only look at the now-infamous – and very, very funny – episode “Trapped In A Closet,” which managed to not only eviscerate Tom Cruise, but also Scientology and R. Kelly in one all-too-brief 20 minute span. Add in their equally damning take on the Terry Schiavo affair along with more light-hearted episodes (Wing, anyone?) and you have a show that’s still firing on all cylinders. The 3-disc set features all 14 episodes, plus mini-commentaries from Trey Parker & Matt Stone.

 

So, for months now, everyone has been speaking of Borat (Fox, Rated R, DVD-$29.99 SRP) as if it is the second coming of comedy – a brilliant, hysterical look at America through the eyes, and actions, of a simple, racist Kazakh journalist named Borat Sagdiyev. Does it live up to all the hype? Mostly, yes. Sacha Baron Cohen’s turn as our unwashed journo is as immersive and convincing as anything Andy Kaufman or Peter Sellers ever did, and the situations he finds himself in are incredibly funny, if cringe-worthy on so very many levels. For some reason, though, Fox has gone relatively half-assed on the bonus materials, with only deleted scenes, a PR featurette, and a music infomercial – no commentary or documentary, and you just know there are more deleted scenes out there. Do I smell a double-dip?

 

It’s always a bit revelatory to go back and watch the first season of a show which spawned a time-honored pop culture catchphrase, to see what the tone was like before it became a hit and changed in style, as all successful shows inevitably do. Watching the first season of Hawaii Five-O (Paramount, Not Rated, DVD-$49.98 SRP) is no different, and what you’ll find – before everyone knew the phrase, “Book ’em, Danno” – was a relatively intense police action-drama starring Jack Lord as Detective Steve McGarrett, who was always hot on the trail of Red Chinese crime boss Wo Fat. The 7-disc collection features all 24 episodes, plus a special edition of Hawaiian show Emmie’s Island Moments focusing on Five-O, with cast crew interviews and a tribute to Jack Lord.

 

As part of the now-routine revisiting of previously released catalogue titles, the little Brit-Com that could is getting a much-needed overhaul via the new 2-disc “Fully Exposed Edition” of The Full Monty (Fox, Rated R, DVD-$19.98 SRP). In addition to a fully remastered, anamorphic print, you get audio commentaries, deleted scenes, original cast interviews, 10 retrospective featurettes, TV spots, and more. Is it worth it? You betcha.

 

 

Expanding their library of themed remastered catalogue releases, Warner Bros. has packaged together 5 fine adaptations into the Literary Classics Collection (Warner Bros., Not Rated, DVD-$59.98 SRP). The five classics in question are Prisoner of Zenda (which contains both the 1937 & 1952 versions), Billy Budd, Madame Bovary, Captain Horatio Hornblower, and The Three Musketeers. While Billy Budd features an audio commentary (with Terence Stamp and Steven Soderbergh) and the theatrical trailer, the remaining flicks feature a complement of vintage shorts, cartoons, trailers, and audio features. Warners continues to be the tops in the treatment of their catalogue, and here’s hoping there’s no end in sight.

 

As with previous Disney revisitations of their classic catalogue for special edition DVD release, the real draw of the new 2-disc edition of Peter Pan (Walt Disney, Rated G, DVD-$29.99 SRP) is the stunning restoration job, which makes the picture and restored soundtrack incredibly pristine. Bonus features include a never-before seen alternate opening, deleted songs, a making-of featurette, 1952’s The Peter Pan Story promotional piece, and a newly-discovered segment of Walt discussing why he made the film. The set is padded out with the usual allotment of Disney DVD garbage like tacky music videos and previews for abysmal sequels, but at least we have a beautiful presentation of the film itself.

 

It disappeared from theaters faster than you could say Ronnie James Dio, but there’s a lot to enjoy in Tenacious D’s flawed big screen adventure, The Pick of Destiny (New Line, Rated R, DVD-$27.98 SRP). The film charts the mythical creation of the D, as a young JB (Jack Black) – child of a repressive father (Meat Loaf) who doesn’t comprehend his hard rock dreams – runs off into the night, eventually to hook up with guitarist KG (Kyle Gass). Success eludes them, but then they learn of the existence of an all-powerful talisman – the Pick of Destiny – which eventually leads them to the Devil himself. It’s a fun romp, even if it’s not the classic I was hoping for. Bonus features include deleted/extended scenes, an alternate ending, outtakes, behind-the-scenes featurettes, a music video, and more.

 

I’ve sung the praises of Electric Tiki‘s Teeny Weeny Mini maquette line in the past, and I’ll continue to do so as long as the continue to produce positively amazing pieces like their Underdog maquette ($69.99). Kudos to Tracy Mark Lee and his team, and I simply can’t wait to see what they have planned in the future. How about a Tooned Up version of the NewsRadio cast? Or Stephen Colbert?

weekendpicks20070309-08.jpg

Yes, I am a card-carrying member of the Nintendo Power generation. I had my subscription to the magazine, I bought tickets to see The Wizard on order to catch a glimpse at the forthcoming Super Mario Bros. 3, and I watched the Saturday morning cartoons, including the animated Mario and Zelda (which were a far sight better than the QBert series). The only series missing was Captain N: The Game Master, and that’s been rectified with a release of the complete series (Shout! Factory, Not Rated, DVD-$34.98 SRP). If you don’t remember the series, it featured the tried and true premise of a teen being whisked to a mythical kingdom – in this, it’s Videoland – in order to save its peace-loving denizens from evil forces, in this case led by Metroid‘s evil Mother Brain. The teen savior of Videoland is Kevin Keene, and he’s teamed with “The N-Team” – Castlevania‘s Simon Belmont, Mega Man, Kid Icarus, Princess Lana, and a dog. There always has to be a dog. The 4-disc set features all 26 episodes, plus the original Nintendo Power “Captain Nintendo” story, concept art, and character bios.

 

Manly men cinephiles will delight in the release of Fox’s 5-flick Ernest Hemingway Film Collection (Fox, Not Rated, DVD-$69.98 SRP), collecting in one set A Farewell To Arms, Hemingway’s Adventures Of A Young Man, The Snows of Kilimanjaro, The Sun Also Rises, and Under My Skin. While there are no bonus features on A Call To Arms, the other four films get audio commentaries, interviews, retrospective featurettes, restoration comparisons, trailers, and more.

 

 

And on the subject of catalogue classics from Fox, they’ve dipped into the vaults for a trio of 70’s era flicks that are worth a spin or two – James Caan & Eli Wallach in Cinderella Liberty, Dustin Hoffman & Mia Farrow in John and Mary, and Susan Sarandon in The Other Side of Midnight (Fox, Rated R/PG/R, DVD-$19.98 SRP each). Bonus features include audio commentaries on Midnight and Liberty, and behind-the-scenes featurettes on John and Mary.

 

It’s unfortunate that such a brilliant and loveable series had to burn itself out so quickly due to behind-the-scenes tussles and the clarion call of approaching superstardom, but at least we can look back at the complete run of that beloved series with the long-awaited release of the fifth and final season of Moonlighting (Lionsgate, Not Rated, DVD-$29.98 SRP). The 3-disc set features all 13 episodes, plus audio commentaries on select episodes and original screen tests.

 

 

As stand-up comics go, Zach Galifianakis is not your average comedian. Look no further than his first DVD – Zach Galifianakis: Live At The Purple Onion (Shout! Factory, Not Rated, DVD-$14.98 SRP) – for proof of that assessment, as he alternates between sublime subtlety and even more sublime heights of fury… Yes, fury. And there’s a piano. Honestly, just buy the DVD and check out one of the most unique performers out there. Bonus materials include outtakes, a shaving featurette, and more.

 

 

I still can’t shake the feeling that a documentary based on Eric Schlosser’s devastating expose of the fast food industry, Fast Food Nation, would have been far more effective and damning than Richard Linklater’s fictionalized big screen adaptation. Maybe that’s because, as a film, Fast Food Nation (Fox, Rated R, DVD-$27.98 SRP) allows for a certain measure of disconnect – there must be some kind of exaggeration, right? I mean, it’s a film, so it can’t all be 100% real. Despite the fact that many of the stories come straight out of Schlosser’s book, it just doesn’t hit with the sledgehammer it should. Bonus features include an audio commentary, a behind-the-scenes featurette, animations, and a photo gallery.

 

Like the two slovenly men it revolves around, the American version of the Britcom hit Men Behaving Badly (Shout! Factory, Not Rated, DVD-$34.98 SRP) was a likeable lunk of a show, but not nearly as smartly written or acted as the original. For that reason, the story of best friends & roommates Kevin & Jamie (Ron Eldard & Rob Schneider) was sort-lived on this side of the pond. Now you can get all 35 episodes (7 of which never aired during its network run) in one 4-disc set and judge for yourself.

 

Want a fun, eminently groovy read this weekend? Check out The Encyclopedia of Sixties Cool (Santa Monica Press, $24.95 SRP), which has entries on everything from Woodstock and Lenny Bruce to Terry Southern and the Ford Mustang.

 

 

 

It’s always a disappointment when a spin-off of a beloved show doesn’t give you the same kind of buzz as the original, and sadly, such is the case with Stargate: Atlantis (MGM/UA, Not Rated, DVD-$49.98 SRP). Maybe it’s because it suffers from many of the same problems as Star Trek‘s less-than-successful spin-off Voyager, both of which found our heroes isolated in a distant corner of the galaxy and largely trying to find their way home. The second season of Atlantis was an improvement, though, and paved the way for a much more dynamic third season. The 5-disc box set features all 20 episodes, plus audio commentaries, featurettes, photo galleries, and more.

 

Who knew that the 80’s – the decade of greed, good looks, and whiter than white teeth – would also spawn so celebratory a geek fest as Revenge of the Nerds? It’s no Citizen Kane, mind you, but the original film is still a rah-rah pic for anyone that’s ever felt the outsider, and that cinematic “legacy” is celebrated in the 4-disc Revenge of the Nerds: Atomic Wedgie Collection (Fox, Rated R/PG-13/NR, DVD-$29.99 SRP), which features the first two theatrical Nerds, as well as the latter-day direct-to-video adventures. The original film even gets a brand new audio commentary (with director Jeff Kanew and actors Robert Carradine, Timothy Busfield, and Curtis Armstrong), deleted scenes, a retrospective featurette, and even the Revenge of the Nerds television pilot.

 

Being quite a bit older than the then-tweener audience that had made Melissa Joan Hart a star as the Disney Channel’s all-explaining Clarissa, my main reason for tuning in to the first season of Sabrina The Teenage Witch (Paramount, Not Rated, DVD-$38.99 SRP) was based entirely on my affection for Mystery Science Theater 3000. You may not know, but during the inaugural season of Sabrina’s magical high school adventures, on set “practical” magic effects were done by Joel Hodgson, creator and former host of MST3K. Oh, and the great Paul Feig (creator of Freaks & Geeks) played her science teacher, Mr. Pool. This 4-disc box set features all 24 first season episodes, but no extras to speak of.

So there you have it… my humble suggestions for what to watch, listen to, play with, or waste money on this coming weekend. See ya next week…

-Ken Plume

##

QSE News: 3/9/2007

Filed under: Columns,News — UncaScroogeMcD @ 1:19 am
quickstopnews.jpg
line1.gif

Here are today’s top entertainment headlines:

  • qsnews.jpg
  • Representatives for the estate of former Queen singer Freddie Mercury have sent a cease and desist order to NECA toys, barring the release of a new Mercury action figure.  According to the order, the figure was never approved and is therefore unauthorized.  When asked for comment about what was wrong with the figure, an insider stated that the toy “just didn’t have that certain, what’s the word, happiness?  No, that’s not the word…”
  • John Popper, lead singer/harmonica player for Blues Traveler, was arrested after Washington State Patrol clocked him going 111 mph in his Mercedes SUV. After searching the vehicle, officers found a large supply of weapons and a small amount of marijuana. When asked about the drugs, Popper stated that it’s “medicinal” and part of his weight loss plan.  When quizzed about the weapons, Popper responded simply, “This isn’t over, Dave Matthews. You know what you did and I’m coming for you.”
  • Disney announced yesterday that production has begun at Pixar on Toy Story 3.  Michael Arndt, who just won an Academy Award for his screenplay to Little Miss Sunshine, is penning the script.  According to Arndt, his “totally original” story is going to center on “Woody and Buzz heading to California so Buzz can be in a talent show.  However, along the way, Woody dies, right?  He ODs or something. So they have to tape him to the back of that little [EXPLETIVE DELETED] car with eyes and drive around with him.”
  • Three hundred fans of pop singer Michael Jackson paid $3,400 each in order to hang out with the reclusive superstar for one special night in Japan.  During the engagement, Jackson talked to the fans and took pictures, but did not sing or dance.  Insiders report that Jackson refused to do any of his “A” material when he found out the event had a 16 and over age limit.
line1.gif

That’s all for today’s news, stay tuned to this channel for all the news that matters least but you still care about.

(Compiled by J. Allen)

##

Quick Stop Thingamabobs: 3/9/2007

Filed under: Columns,Thingamabobs — UncaScroogeMcD @ 1:13 am
thingamabobs.jpg

The web. It’s a big place, full of plenty of distractions ““ some funny, some informative, some ludicrous, some disturbing, some inane, some profound. Each and every weekday, we present links to a few of our favorite finds”¦

————————————————

  • A song for anyone out there whose parents just don’t understand them… (Thingamabob)
  • Toss and turn your way over to the first episode of Can’t Sleep With Dave Foley… (Thingamabob)
  • Geena Davis talks of the somewhat limited roles of women in kid’s cartoons… (Thingamabob)

Have a THINGAMABOB? Send it in!

##

March 8, 2007

A Plea From Terry Gilliam (or “Who put the “˜Think’ in ThinkFilm?”)

Filed under: Articles — UncaScroogeMcD @ 4:35 am
tideland-header.jpg

tideland-01.jpgAs you should know, Terry Gilliam’s Tideland was just released on DVD in the US, Canada, and the UK.

If you live in the UK, everything’s fine ““ you have an absolutely perfect copy of the film, presented as Terry intended..

However, if you’ve purchased a Region 1 copy of Tideland, you’re not getting everything that Gilliam intended. While the bonus materials are all hunky-dory, the film itself is presented in an incorrect aspect ratio. While the theatrical aspect ratio was 2.35:1 and the UK disc was released at 2.25:1, the Region 1 release is 1.78:1.

Here’s what Terry himself had to say about the situation, courtesy of Phil Stubbs’s Dreams website:

“I mastered the DVD and decided that opening it up a bit vertically from the strict 2.35 looked better on the small screen. It’s probably about 2.25. It is the choice of the director. Tell the fans to relax. I prefer it this way.”

So while that is the way it was presented on Revolver’s UK DVD release, such is not the case with ThinkFilm’s 1.78:1 disc.

Initially, Terry believed that the Canadian release was correct, and sent this note into the Dreams site:

“I think we have to get the word out NOT TO BUY the American version of the DVD. The Canadian version is correct. It’s Region 1… so Americans can see the film as intended” but, sadly, Mr. Gilliam had been deceived about the US release and may yet be wrong about the Canadian one. Is there ANYBODY out there who can confirm without a shadow of a doubt that the Canadian release is in the correct 2.25:1 aspect ratio?”

Unfortunately, the Canadian release is presented in exactly the same incorrect ratio as ThinkFilm’s US release.

tideland-02.jpg

After discovering this, Terry has sent us a follow-up”¦

“I’m embarrassed! Having been assured that the Canadian DVD was the correct format, I now discover I was completely misled.

What was I thinking? Why hadn’t I jumped a plane and flown to Toronto to buy a Tideland DVD on the 1st day of sales? I would have known the truth before opening my big mouth. What a fool!!! I can begin to see why Stanley Kubrick went a bit whacko trying to keep an eye on every print of his films in every far-flung corner of the globe… and he had a full-time guy doing the legwork.

Any volunteers?

What I recommend for all the owners of the North American Tideland DVD is to get a roll of wide black tape… sorry, before you do that, go out and buy a dozen more copies of the DVDs and pass them out to your friends, then… pause the disc at the Capri Films logo when it flares out into a blue sky. What you see is the correct proportion of 2.35:1. Then, unrolling the tape, mask off the black areas on the
screen above and below. If you want to leave a little bit more space top and bottom of the logo you will end up with the UK proportion. Then you should just sit back and enjoy. All the information left to right is there. There was no panning and scanning. Just stupidity.

-Terry

p.s. Check next day to see how many of your friends will still look you in the eye. They are the people you should be spending time with. Fuck the others!”

So there you have it, straight from the man himself. Will ThinkFilm release a corrected version? We can only hope”¦ Though I’m not exactly holding my breath.

##

The Fred Hembeck Show: Episode 94 – What Would Charlie Droople Do?

Filed under: The Fred Hembeck Show — UncaScroogeMcD @ 2:32 am

fredhembeckheader.jpg

This week’s episode of “The Fred Hembeck Show” is a thrill-packed sequel to our 90th edition, the one featuring “The Massacre of the Innocents”. You might recall that I identified that long-lost, highly idiosyncratic tale, as being one of three that I can’t help but look back on as extremely influential in shaping my own oddball approach to cartooning.

Well, friends, today we have a second neglected gem to share with you, one that actually appeared several years earlier than our previous offering. Released in late 1967, “The Best of All Possible Worlds” was NOT the subject of this memorable Rocke Mastroserio scenario (based, no doubt, on a striking layout provided him by editor/art director Dick Giordano) gracing the cover of the January, 1968 issue of Charlton’s The Many Ghosts of Dr. Graves (number five, for those of you scoring along at home…), but trust me, it was in there…

fredhembeck2007-03-08-01.jpg

(Oh, and if that cover looks a wee bit familiar to some of you and you’re not quite sure why, I should point out that it was prominently displayed in a Charlton Comics house ad found in all the line’s titles, right alongside Steve Ditko’s cover for Blue Beetle #6, the issue that famously never actually came out! In fact, you can find that very advertisement tucked inside the pages of Dr. Graves #5 itself, which offers the paying customer a curious – and unique – choice: “Hey kid, wanna buy ANOTHER copy of a comic ya already have, or wouldja prefer the one we’re never gonna publish? Yer choice…”)

The eight-page story – written by Steve Skeates and drawn (as well as lettered) by Jim Aparo – cleverly plays around with various comic book conventions, not merely breaking the fourth wall along the way, but downright demolishing it in the process! Both separately and in tandem, Skeates and Aparo did a lot of fine work in their respective careers (including a memorable run on Aquaman, one that allowed me, for the ONLY time in my entire life, to honestly utter the words, “Gee, I can’t wait until the next issue of Aquaman comes out!”….), but the strange saga of Charlie Droople remains my all-time favorite by the pair to this day.

fredhembeck2007-03-08-02.jpg

Now, I don’t want to say much more about the story in question for two reasons. Firstly, I’d like you to read it for yourselves (yes, this entire sentence serves as the handy-dandy link), fresh, and without too much of it being given away. Secondly, I’ve already HAD my say on “The Best of All Possible Worlds” – y’see, several years back, I contributed a Dateline:@#$% strip focusing on it to a Charlton-centric issue of Comic Book Artist (Hey, remember Comic Book Artist, folks? Gee, whatever became of that fine publication anyway?…). When you get to the eighth and final page of the Skeates/Aparo opus, you’ll find a link to my strip at the bottom, and – should you be in any way interested – THAT would be the proper time to check out my thoughts (but NOT before – read the real thing first, cuz that’s the main attraction here, okay?…).

So, go! Enjoy! And afterwards, ask yourself – would I make the same choices as Charlie Droople?

I did, and look what it got me: Hembeck.com! Please come visit – I get SO lonely sometimes…

-Copyright 2007 Fred Hembeck

Music For The Masses: 3/8/07

Filed under: Music for the Masses — UncaScroogeMcD @ 2:11 am
musicmasses2.jpg

Hello again, everybody, and welcome back to “Music for the Masses.” This week, because I know you love them more than Rosie O’Donnell loves to buckle up for love, I’m dishing up another one of them thar’ podcast “thingies.” But don’t worry, folks, if your internet connection sucks harder than Antonella “There’s a Party In My Mouth And EVERYONE’S Comin” Barba, you can still join in the festivities. More on that in a sec because now… IT’S PODCAST TIME!!!!

[CONTENT WARNING]: This podcast, much like its written counterpart, contains foul language, foolish notions, loads of “hooker” talk, a “Dirty Sanchez” reference and horribly off-color jokes. Please enjoy responsible and know when to say when.

DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
Music For The Masses: Episode 4 (MP3 format) ““ 25.43 MB

Okay, for those of you reading along at home, here’s the M4M podcast short tour…

hooker 3-8-07

Not 100% positive, but I think that’s my old Sunday School teacher.

Up first, I mediate a debate between Double A and J. Allen over “which song is the best to bang a hooker to.” Honestly, considering how well I know these guys, I’m just glad they didn’t debate “the best song to BURY a hooker to.” Good fun is had by all and much frivolity ensues.

screetch

Then, after careful consideration, some “pointless” rambling and a brief discussion of Screetch’s donkey dork and his propensity for “wiping doody under noses,” we FINALLY get around to offering up our opinions on some new music. This week, we (meaning me and those other two clowns) focus our attentions on the new discs from Arcade Fire, Explosions in the Sky and the tongue-twisting Au Revoir Simone. Here’s the ratings:

arcade 3-8-07

Artist: Arcade Fire

Album: Neon Bible

Sounds Like: Somebody needs to pop a couple o’ Prozacs©, find their “happy place” and turn their frowns upside down.

Rating:

hung4 3-7-08

sky 3-8-07

Artist: Explosions in the Sky (www.myspace.com/texasband )

Album: All Of A Sudden I Miss Everyone

Sounds Like: The internal soundtrack now playing in the heads of all of the football players I went to high school with… as they mow my lawn.

Rating:

hung3 3-8-07

simone 3-8-07

Artist: Au Revoir Simone (www.myspace.com/aurevoirsimone)

Album: The Bird of Music

Sounds Like: The music that would be playing just before Chris Hanson walks into the kitchen and you realize you are one, fucked pervert… umm, no pun intended.

Rating:

hung4 3-7-08

UPCOMING MUSIC RELEASES… 3/13/07:

ARTIST TITLE GENRE
Amy Winehouse Back To Black ALT
James Morrison Undiscovered POP / ROCK
Rich Boy Rich Boy RAP
Zion I Street Legends RAP
Ken Andrews Secrets Of The Lost Satellite ROCK
Mason Proper There Is A Moth In Your Chest ROCK
Sherwood A Different Light ROCK
The Fratellis Costello Music ROCK
Unsane Visqueen ROCK
William Tell You Can Hold Me Down ROCK
The Alternate Routes Good and Reckless and True AAA
Agnostic Front & Discipline Working Class Heroes POP / ROCK
Death By Stereo Death Alive POP / ROCK
Green Lizard Las Armas Del Silencio POP / ROCK
Nakatomi Plaza Unsettled POP / ROCK
Pyle, Artimus Artimus Venomus POP / ROCK
The Fireballs Firebeat! POP / ROCK
The Flaming Stars Born Under A Bad neon Sign POP / ROCK
Theatre of Hate Retribution POP / ROCK
8 Ball and MJG Ridin’ High RAP
Auto Interiors Let’s Agree To Deceive Our Best Friends ROCK
Crematory Klagebilder ROCK
Diddley, Bo Bo’s The Man ROCK
Dybdahl, Thomas Science ROCK
Ford, Marc Weary And Wired ROCK
Gang Font featuring Interloper Gang Font featuring Interloper ROCK
Heavenly Virus ROCK
Holy Moses World Chaos ROCK
Letcher, Chris Frieze ROCK
Lodger Hi-Fi High Lights Down Low ROCK
Meek, Joe The Joe Meek EP Collection Box Set (12 CD) ROCK
Messiah’s Kiss Dragonheart ROCK
Parker, Graham Don’t Tell Columbus ROCK
Prosser Prosser ROCK
Runic Liar Flags ROCK
Skolnick, Alex Trio Last Day In Paradise ROCK
Starcastle Song Of Times ROCK
Storys, The Storys, The ROCK
Tankard Kings Of Beer ROCK
Third Ending, The Third Ending, The ROCK
Type O Negative Dead Again ROCK
Van Der Spuy, Nibs Beautiful Feet ROCK
Elliott Murphy Coming Home Again ROCK
The Fades The Fades ROCK
Grand Champeen Dial “T” For This ROCK
Joey McIntyre Talk To Me ROCK
Mitch Easter Dynamico ROCK
Bardi Johannson HAXAN ROCK
P. J. O”Connell Careful ROCK
The PirkQlaters Last Stand ROCK
Tom Curren Tom Curren ROCK
Peppertown Firefly ROCK
The Red Button She’s About To Cross My Mind ROCK
Spencer Durham Much More Than Words ROCK
Central Services Central Services ROCK

And there you have it, folks. Was it as good for you as it was for me? Nice!

Until next time, keep wearing it proud and playing it loud!

Send your favorite, hooker-bangin’ song, review copies, assorted hate mail and presents to:

M.C. Bell
P.O. Box 1222
Arvada, CO 80001

HOW TO WHEEL AND DEAL WITH A DEAF HOOKER

deafhooker

E-MAIL THE AUTHOR

QSE News: 3/8/2007

Filed under: Columns,News — UncaScroogeMcD @ 1:57 am
quickstopnews.jpg
line1.gif

Here are today’s top entertainment headlines:

  • qsnews.jpg
  • Marvel Comics has killed off one of its most recognizable characters ““ Captain America. Marvel has released a statement saying that plan on continuing the spirit of Captain America through other characters which will embody different aspects of America such as The Radical Right Winger, The Whiney Democrat and Jose Can-Chu-See.
  • Actress Kirsten Dunst has been named the Female Star of the Year at this year’s ShoWest film convention.  This is the award is the first major award that Dunst has won since her Golden Globe turn in Interview With a Vampire.  Organizers of ShoWest picked Dunst for the award in hopes that she will start picking more serious roles that will lead to nude scenes.
  • Gi-normous and angry talk show host, Rosie O’Donnell, has admitted that she has been treated for depression ever since the Columbine school shooting in 1999.  As part of her treatments to improve her mental health, O’Donnell claims that she hangs upside down for up to a half-hour everyday.  As a result of this “revelation,” we here at QSE News are reminded to tip our hats to the hard working men and women of the steel industry for making structural supports that can hold outlandish weights.
  • A reunited Genesis is heading out on tour. This version of the band will consist of Tony Banks, Phil Collins and Mike Rutherford with additional musicians to help round out the band’s sound. The group will play songs from the entire Genesis catalogue while ignoring the fact that Peter Gabriel was really the only talented member of the group.
line1.gif

That’s all for today’s news, stay tuned to this channel for all the news that matters least but you still care about.

(Compiled by J. Allen)

##

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress