FRED Entertainment

July 19, 2007

Nocturnal Admissions: DVD Review – Premonition

Filed under: Columns,Nocturnal Admissions — UncaScroogeMcD @ 4:28 am

nocturnalheader5.gif

When I told a colleague that I had to get off the phone in order to finish a review of the Premonition DVD, the question came up, “Why are you reviewing that film?” “Because I like Sandra Bullock.” “No you don’t! You told me you didn’t like her.” My reply was, “I have always liked her. It is unthinkable that I would ever say what you are attributing to me. It is simply not true.” My love for her may not run as deep as that for Lindsay Lohan, but it is sincere and consistent.

Premonition Sandy

And indeed I’ve been a fan of Bullock’s since Speed, like everyone else. Her spunkiness on the screen, where she more or less supplanted Meg Ryan in the kookiness wars, was not matched by business savvy off screen, evinced in her appearing in the sequel. Earlier, though, she was dignified in the otherwise girly role as the sidekick cop in Demolition Man, and powerful and underrated in the now ignored Wrestling Ernest Hemingway . My love I was especially taken with her in While You Were Sleeping, and subsequently Bullock has always excelled at lonely loners and oddball brainiacs, such as in The Net, which I also enjoyed. The kooky thing got old after a while ( Hope Floats, Forces of Nature), but one residue of them is that you almost always knew what a Sandra Bullock movie was going to be like. She was the author of a brand.

And as one must be, also a producer of her own movies, while still maintaining the kookiness franchise in the Congeniality movies. But, inevitably as it does to all actresses, maturity came to claim her. In recent years she was excellent in Crash, and better as Harper Lee in Infamous than Catherine Keener was in Capote. Earlier this year she had another serious role in Premonition, as a woman who finds her self in a time shift, a sort of Groundhog Day times two in which every other day she lives through a day in the future, after her husband has been killed in a car crash and other haphazard injuries have been inflicted on her kids and herself.

Though I respect what Bullock wants to do as she gets older (she is only 42, but that is something like 60 in Actress Years), I generally don’t relish seeing her in the serious stuff. The film ended up making almost $50 million dollars but these days that translate into a “disappointment,” and in any case, the trailers were not so hot, more confusing than intriguing. The Forgotten had enticing trailers, for example, but was a crappy movie; here, the opposite dynamic was in play. Premonition is an OK movie, not quite my thing, but Bullock is good in it, and it is movies like these, in which stars work so hard only to be more or less ignored, that must give them pause, make them stop and wonder why the hell they are doing this in the first place.

Bullock plays Linda Quinn Hanson, the female half of a perfect household. But one day she wakes up and time has shifted forward a week, after her husband, Jim (Julian McMahon), has died in a tragic highway accident right out of the Final Destination movies (in fact, Premonition reminds me of a film from the 1990s with a then-current flavor of the week starlet as a character who keeps waking up in a different world alternately with or without her boyfriend. I’ve been unable to remember the actress, the title, the plot, or the year, but I know it was out there). Of course, people think she is crazy, and she keeps picking up misleading hints as to her husband’s secret life (possibly with co-worker Amber Valletta). The script, credited to Bill Kelly, who likes time warp movies (he also wrote Blast from the Past and the forthcoming Enchanted), walks a delicate line between what Linda learns and what she really learns, but the film does demand that you mentally keep an accounting book going on the whole time. The cause of this disruption in time is never explained, just as it is also not explained in Me Myself I, one of numerous time warp movies from the 1990s that also include Sliding Doors and the movie I can’t remember.

For this reason, Premonition is probably idea for the home market, where you can pause, review, discuss amongst yourselves, and basically hash out the plot. What’s interesting about the film is how Linda’s moods and attitudes change with each new day, at one point deciding that Jim deserves to die and all she has to do is nothing. If the film has a major flaw, besides being confusing, it is humorlessness, although there is a scene of high comedy where Jim’s coffin falls and breaks and his head goes rolling down the street.

Premonition making of

As is to be expected from a major release from a big company, Premonition comes in a fine widescreen transfer (2.40 enhanced), with excellent Dolby Digital 5.1 sound in English and French, with English, French, and Spanish. The main supplement is the rather quite audio commentary with director Mennan Yapo ( Lautlos) and with Bullock herself, where the emphasis is on character motivation and shooting process.

Premonition alternate ending

There are also five deleted scenes with optional director’s commentary, most of the scenes excised for purposes of pacing (still not successful since Premonition still has a glacial pace), and an alternate ending, which turns out to be no ending at all. Following this, there are two making ofs, “Glimpses of the Future: Making Premonition,” about 15 minutes, and mostly boilerplate promotional material, and the slightly shorter “Bringing Order to Chaos,” which helpfully puts the days of the film in chronological order. This is followed by the two part “Real Premonitions,” about 30 minutes, and three minutes of gag reel material, mostly having to do with dead birds or pranks on the actors (which also show Bullock to be a fun person to have on the set). Finally there are trailers for Across the Universe (seemingly a cross between Hair and Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band), The Messengers, and Ghost Rider. I wish that they had also included her appearance on The Daily Show where she came across, as always, as a game girl who likes to have fun, and where she was quite forthright about getting lost in the labyrinth of the plot.

Premonition box

Premonition, in widescreen, full frame and Blu-Ray formats, comes in a keep case. The widescreen edition streeted on Tuesday, July 17th, and retailed for $28.95.

July 18, 2007

Interview: Kevin Murphy

Filed under: Interviews — UncaScroogeMcD @ 7:38 am

murphy2007-07-18-01.jpg

–by Ken Plume

murphy2007-07-18-02.jpg

Though an accomplished author and performer, Kevin Murphy will perhaps be forever known as a wise-cracking robot with a gumball dispenser head, springy arms, a stout body, and an underwear fetish. Barring that, he’ll probably also be remembered as a giant talking monkey.

For 9 seasons, Kevin performed Tom Servo on Mystery Science Theater 3000, expanding his on-screen time with his frighteningly nuanced portrayal of the intelligent simian Professor Bobo, in addition to his writing duties for the series.

Post-MST, Kevin has been a frequent contributor to NPR, and written the cinematic travelogue A Year At The Movies, which chronicled his worldwide journey to experience a film a day in theaters around the globe.

He’s also re-teamed with fellow Satellite of Love refugees Mike Nelson and Bill Corbett as the B-movie quipping Film Crew, plus he’s been a frequent guest-riffer on Mike Nelson & Legend Films’ RiffTrax commentaries (you can check out their full catalog here).

Kevin was sequestered in his palatial, heavily wooded retreat when he deigned to grant us a sizeable fraction of his valuable (and creative) “me” time…

line1.gif

murphy2007-07-18-03.jpgKEVIN MURPHY: Ken?

KEN PLUME: Hey, how are you doing?

MURPHY: I’m doing pretty well, how are you?

KP: I’m doing well. Is this still a good time for you?

MURPHY: Yep. I’m just sitting here watching The Fountain.

KP: Ah…

MURPHY: Everybody’s reaction is the same! “What are you doing?” “Well, today I’ve got to screen The Fountain…” They say, “Ah.”

KP: Well, it’s not exactly a happy-go-lucky, springtime film…

MURPHY: Well, for Aronofsky, it’s a romp. It’s a lark. It’s a spree.

KP: It’s a celebration of happiness and light and the power of love across the centuries.

MURPHY: It’s true.

KP: For everyone else…

MURPHY: It’s the Bataan death march on film.

KP: Have you made it a good chunk of the way through it?

MURPHY: Oh, I just got started. He’s a conquistador and his movie gets invaded by the cast of Apocalypto. Then suddenly finds himself in a sort of outer space Zen monastery, and that’s where I am right now.

KP: Is this recreational viewing?

MURPHY: It goes into the realm of research. First of all, you’ve got to keep on top of these things. Hollywood keeps whipping these things out, and you have to keep your eye on the thing. I’m always suspicious of Darren Aronofsky, so I need to make sure I know what he’s doing at all times.

KP: Do you sometimes feel like the cinematic equivalent of a Buddhist monk with a gas can beside you?

MURPHY: (laughs) Yeah, but you know, those Buddhist monks, they’re sort of like Karma criminals. They’re not supposed to do that sort of thing.

KP: No, but do you feel like,” This is when I finally light the match, on this film…”?

MURPHY: Oh sure, absolutely. But this is not the one. There are worse.

KP: Did you get a chance to look at some of the other pieces we’ve done recently?

MURPHY: Actually I have not. I ought to.

KP: Oh, so you have no idea what people are saying about you.

MURPHY: What are they saying about me?

KP: Oh, wonderful things. Bill was nothing but complimentary with most of he had to say about you. The other stuff was unprintable.

MURPHY: Bill who?

KP: He writes plays.

MURPHY: Oh, that guy.

KP: And I also have a special guest on the line. He’s a bit frail, but Kevin, I’d like to introduce you to Coleman Francis…

MURPHY: (laughs)

KP: Do you ever worry about a This is Your Life coming out of the blue and hitting you with all these things?

MURPHY: I can go on IMDB and make sure Coleman is dead – and if not, that he’s old enough that I could knock him over.

KP: Six years out, I’m curious if your thoughts on the theater going experience had changed any since doing A Year At The Movies.

MURPHY: You know, it’s better and it’s worse. I don’t think, in my mind, it’s any surprise that generally what comes out of Hollywood is still largely very highly polished shit. And yet there are still some excellent alternatives to the regular fare. I’m delighted to report that the small one-screeners that I love here in town have survived. They’re struggling, but they still survive because there’s enough people to keep them populated.

KP: Struggled in the same way they’ve always struggled?

MURPHY: Oh, it’s the same old struggle.

KP: So it’s not like things have gotten worse for them – it’s maintained…

MURPHY: Oh, the Parkway needs a remodeling job. The letters are starting to fall off the sign every now and again, but the popcorn is still excellent. And one of my favorites, the Riverview Theater, is doing quite well. In fact, it’s thriving. And the Heights Theater, which is up north of town, is also thriving, and that’s very heartening. They’re doing reparatory. That’s very encouraging. One of the things that’s changed significantly since I wrote that book is the spread of the small screen. The really, really small screen, in the case of You Tube and such things. And although it’s allowed the entire world to become a bad film director, or at least very derivative, it is changing things. Somehow I think that’s for the better, because people are hungry for alternatives to big giant movies. Except if you’re 12. You still want to go see Shrek on the night it opens.

KP: I find it interesting how much unseen product has made its way onto You Tube. It’s like You Tube is this no man’s land where anything is possible to be screened.

MURPHY: I love it. My house doesn’t have a basement, so thank god there’s You Tube, because it’s really like rummaging around in the basement that I never had. In the basement of my media memory. It’s great fun. There used to be a show called Night Music. It was produced by David Sanborn and it had Jools Holland as the host. It was on weekends. It was an obscure little show, but dear god they had some of the most wonderful performers on it. For several years I’ve wanted to at least see a copy of the one Leonard Cohen was on. He did a version of the song “Who By Fire” with most of the band Was Not Was and David Sanborn, and Sonny Rollins did this amazing, truly amazing solo on the saxophone, and it just came out of nowhere and it disappeared and there was nowhere to find it. Well, of course, now I found it on You Tube. It’s just one of those very rare performances kinda thing that you’d maybe see in a concert and never be able to recapture it, but this was something that was on a very obscure network television show many, many years ago, and now I can see it again. That’s kinda cool.

murphy2007-07-18-04.jpgKP: How often do you spend time plumbing the depths of your memory in front of You Tube?

MURPHY: I don’t spend a lot of time. I’m not a shopper. You know how some people can just go into a secondhand store and look around for hours and hours? My spouse, for one. I love her, and she just loves to do that. I generally have something in mind. I go in, I look for it, if it’s not there, I leave. If I find it, I grab it, and then I leave. I’m not a browser, much. I just don’t have the time for that. My mind is already too full.

KP: Beyond the Leonard Cohen clip, what has been the most obscure or surprising thing you’ve found? Or wish you hadn’t found?

MURPHY: Nothing springs to mind. Again, I don’t spend a lot of time there. I usually go there with a task in mind. Some little psychic lawn darts from my own childhood are these little animated cartoons that used to be on the afternoon cartoon show when I was a small child. Which were already old when I was watching them. At Christmas time there’s an odd little song about Hard Rock, Coco and Joe, three elves that accompany Santa on his sleigh. I’ve always loved that song. I haven’t looked, but I have to look because the other thing that’s always plagued my dreams is this odd TV show called Diver Dan.

KP: Oh yes, my father talks about Diver Dan all the time.

MURPHY: Diver Dan would be in a brass hat – you know, the old navy deep diver brass hat suit – and he’d interact with fish string puppets. And he had this hot babe mermaid that he’d visit every now and again, although he’s in a brass hat so he really couldn’t get it on. And they film the whole thing – this is what I love – they film the whole thing in front of a giant aquarium. So you’d see fish swimming by. It was in an odd way quite brilliant, and that struck me when I was a kid. Are they really under water? And my brother would say, “No, they sat in front of an aquarium, for god sakes, grow up.”

KP: Was he always condescending to you like that?

MURPHY: My brother?

KP: Yes.

MURPHY: Oh no, no, they always tried to elevate me up to their level and bring me out of the depths of my stupidity.

KP: So it was like an aquatic Howdy Doody?

MURPHY: I guess you could say that, except it was much more serious. Diver Dan would get into some real mix ups, and there was a vaguely German, Eastern European sort of bad fish named Baron von Barracuda, who for some reason had a thug from the bowery as his assistant. He was a trigger fish and they called him trigger. And of course there were good fish and bad fish. The whole world’s about the struggle between good fish and bad fish.

KP: The Incredible Mr. Limpet taught us that.

MURPHY: That’s right. But this was really bad puppeteering and crude puppets, so it’s close to my heart.

KP: Have you found it on You Tube?

MURPHY: I haven’t looked for it, but this has inspired me to do such a thing.

KP: I wouldn’t be surprised if there was a DVD release. Is that something that, just for nostalgia’s sake, you would revisit?

MURPHY: Yeah. I wouldn’t spend a whole lot of time.

KP: The set would never grace your shelf.

MURPHY: I think not. I mean, I liked it, but I didn’t like it.

KP: You don’t need the entire 50 hour run.

MURPHY: There it is! I’ll be damned. It’s Diver Dan. It had a great opening theme song. Sort of sounded like the Kingston Trio or something. Here, listen to this. There, you see, and it goes on like that.

KP: Why don’t people do shows like that anymore?

MURPHY: You know, I think people do. Except they’re about eight years old and they do them in their basement.

KP: And now it’s on the net.

MURPHY: That’s right!

KP: And we’re not being facetious when we say those kind of shows are on the net now.

MURPHY: It’s true. Anybody can have a TV show. Truly.

KP: In many ways MST was a throwback to that sort of ethos.

MURPHY: Oh, I think there was no doubt about that. It generated from our childhood memories of having creature features and hosted movies. That was always in my mind, and it certainly led to the choice of movies we had. Because at KTMA, we had a shelf full of… a lot of films we could have done that were truly just dismal 80s films, but we always went for the cornier ones. For the science fiction ones. The Japanese monster movies seemed to be perfect, because that was the throwback I think was to the creature features.

KP: I’ve always been curious what the initial job description was for your time at KTMA. When you first took the job…

MURPHY: I was hired to shoot commercials. Jim (Mallon) actually called me up. I had worked with him at WHA in Madison, the public station there. And we would knock around, have fun. We’d go out on shoots every now and again. I always enjoyed his sense of humor, and he mine.

KP: What would knocking around and having fun with Jim entail?

MURPHY: Madison. Madison’s a college town, so use your imagination. (laughs) We ran in the same social circles, and that was based quite a bit around the university and the station WHA. And I still have a lot of good friends from down there even though I left there almost 20 years ago.

KP: Does it seem like that long?

MURPHY: Some days. Depends. If the humidity’s up.

KP: What was your initial impression of Jim when you first met him?

MURPHY: He had a sort of… what would you say… a status, having been in the Pail and Shovel party, and being the president of the student government and having done these amazingly anarchistic little feats of public exhibition. He was like a public artist, and he and his pal Leon Varjian were always surprising and always delightful. So, I had respect for him as a guy who did these mad quirks of, I guess you’d call them anarchistic comedy. But he was in a student government to do it. And he knew nothing about me, but I found him to be very unassuming and jovial and always great fun to hang around with. We really got to know each other… I went to work as a crew member on the film Muskie Madness, and we got to spend six or seven weeks up in the north woods of Wisconsin just being goofy and shooting a horror movie.

KP: This is what was eventually retitled Blood Hook, right?

MURPHY: Blood Hook, yes. The Troma people got a hold of it and said, “Muskie Madness, what’s that? What’s a Muskie? What are you talking about here? Listen I got a good title for you, it’s gonna be Blood Hook. Who knows for Muskie?” What they didn’t know is that muskie is the number one game fish in the United States, young man. It is tougher to land than the mighty tarpon. It will bite through piano wire. I have a friend who had his hand swallowed by a muskie. He had to pull it back out and it was filled with bite marks.

KP: As if I wasn’t afraid enough of the ocean, inland waterways are now off limits…

MURPHY: (laughs) Don’t go in the northern lakes during October, my friend, because the muskies are hungry then. That’s how we keep the ruffians out. It’s actually gorgeous here all year round.

KP: How long was the shoot?

MURPHY: It was about six weeks. It was Martin Mull who said that making movies was like college with money, or high school with money. I think that’s what it was. And that’s what it felt like. It was like summer camp. Although we really didn’t have any money, because it was an incredibly low budget thing, but we camped out at a local old-fashioned hotel and would shoot day and night and just… I learned so much about the filmmaking process in one shoot, because we had to do everything with nothing.

KP: So, really, titles meant nothing on that production…

MURPHY: Well, they really did. We had a professional crew and everything broke down the way it ought to. And everybody really counted on people to do their jobs and to know their jobs – and if they didn’t, then to learn their jobs damn quick. That’s one of the beauties of independent filmmaking. You can learn really fast, because for some positions… I mean, I’d never been a key grip on a film before. I’d run a dolly and rigged lights and things like that, but I’d always been… I’d done a few jobs as a PA on this film, or that or this commercial or that. I came to Wisconsin and this came along and it just seemed like, “Well, why the hell not? What a wonderful experience.” And it was. It’s the best fun I’ve ever had on a film set.

KP: What was the biggest learning curve for you on the set?

MURPHY: Well, probably, I learned later that some of the things we were doing were really dangerous. Like running wires from the shore out to a floating raft in the middle of this lake, in the rain.

KP: Who’s idea was that?

MURPHY: Well, we had a lighting director, and they needed light from a certain source, and it made sense. It worked. We did it and we didn’t kill ourselves, and we didn’t put ourselves in imminent danger. And we were never crazy stupid dumb about it, we were just… occasionally unsafe, is what I’d say. We had this one set for about a week on a boathouse on this beautiful lake in northern Wisconsin. There was something that wasn’t properly grounded, and so you could actually feel the current through your shoes as you were walking along the dock. It was a little unsettling.

KP: But no one thought to do anything about it.

MURPHY: Well, eventually. I felt the tingle, and I said to Rob, who was the gaffer, “Rob, do you feel a tingle through your shoes?” And he said, “Oh, that’s not good.” So he had somebody run and check the ground and we were fine. We were lacking some of the safety features that union shoots provide, let’s put it that way.

KP: Like death prevention.

MURPHY: But it was an adventure. We built all our sets with Makita screw guns and a chainsaw, pretty much. Truly, it was chainsaw carpentry. Everyone was issued a Makita screw gun, and so when I wasn’t actually on set, I was part of the swing gang putting the new sets up for the next day.

KP: So really it was that flexibility that was the biggest means of learning on that shoot…

MURPHY: Yeah. And also how to work 16 hours a day and still have the energy to drink like a fool at night.

KP: Well, that’s just Midwestern filmmaking, isn’t it?

MURPHY: (laughs) Yes, there were a couple of fine bars there and, at the time, the microbrewery Eau Claire had an all-malt lager, and it was quite a wonderful thing.

KP: That was the real muskie madness.

MURPHY: That truly was the muskie madness. It was a blast. It was the best summer camp I ever had.

KP: When you’re filming a low budget film like that, what are the expectations? Is it just, “We’re doing this because we can…”?

MURPHY: I think the number one reason to do it is because it’s going to be fun. People who make a low budget film thinking that they’re going to get rich are usually naïve and stupid and they’re never going to get rich. If you don’t do it for the fun of it or for the enjoyment of it or for the pleasure of it, then I think it’s kinda stupid otherwise.

KP: Do you think that difference in reasons for doing it shows in the final product? You’ve seen enough low budget films that were made by fertilizer salesmen who are hoping for Hollywood…

MURPHY: (laughs) Well, that’s the thing. That’s what I mean – if you’re looking beyond the movie to what this movie’s going to get you, then you’re probably looking at the wrong thing. That’s shown up over and over again. But that doesn’t mean… one of the things you learn is that, with a few exceptions, when the thing’s low budget, you get what you pay for. So if you don’t have a whole lot of money to dedicate to the script writing and you don’t have a lot of money to dedicate to hiring actors, and so you get a lot of community theater rejects, you have to work with that. If whoever’s in charge has enough talent to hold it together – and, I would say, poise – then yeah, maybe you’ll come out with something that’s fun and interesting.

KP: So what was that first screening of Muskie Madness like?

MURPHY: Oh, it was great fun. It was great fun. We actually had a premier here in Minneapolis. We built a boat dock and people would drive up in their cars and get on the boat dock in their tuxedoes and go into the theater. It was pure showmanship there.

KP: And they were all rented tuxedoes at that point?

MURPHY: Of course! And, you know, the movie was goofy. It was meant to be goofy, and it was meant to look like a goofy low-budget film, and it certainly succeeded in that way.

KP: Is the fact that it’s still out there and available surprising to you?

MURPHY: No, actually, it’s not. Part of it’s probably because of the success that Mystery Science Theater had, that it’s still out there. And another one is that Troma never drops anything from their schedule once they put it on there. So you can always find those things. For me, I honestly don’t know what other people thought of the film, and frankly I don’t care, because for me it was sort of like, we went to camp and we made this movie, and so every time I watch it, I find something in there that I just love because I remember how it happened.

KP: If someone were to do an MST treatment to that, how would you feel?

MURPHY: If there was someone to do it, I’d possibly be involved, but I wouldn’t be involved in that. That’s a little too close to the bone. I mean, I wouldn’t care. The movie’s as ripe for it as a lot of movies have been.

KP: So, if Mike called you up and said, “Kevin, I’m thinking a RiffTrax…”

MURPHY: It would feel a little bit like incest. So it would probably not be good, because I’m not a fan of incest.

KP: Well, it’s good that no one has attempted it yet.

MURPHY: Well, I’m sure they have, in their own private little domains.

KP: Which is where that sort of thing originated anyway.

MURPHY: That’s right, (laughs)

KP: Having finished the film, at what point did the KTMA job enter the picture?

MURPHY: It wasn’t long after. Actually, Jim finished the film and he moved to Minneapolis and was editing it, and that’s where he met Joel (Hodgson). He was in an office space in the warehouse district of downtown Minneapolis, and Joel had a studio in the same building. And so they ran into each other and got to know each other a little bit. It wasn’t long after that Jim got the job at KTMA. And it was all subterfuge. I mean, he brought me out there pretty much telling that the reason to have this job – and we have to shoot the commercials and we have to do the local hosted matinee movies and we have to do the public relations programming – but we have access to tools and we can do anything we want with them. That was the appeal to me – we could make a TV show and we could actually get it on the air. It was truly the month after I got there that Jim and I started putting together these news parodies that we did.

KP: This was the introduction of the Bob Baggadonuts character, right?

MURPHY: Right. Yes, and that was always great fun.

KP: I wonder, having seen those pieces, if things had gone differently and Josh (Weinstein) had not left MST, I really cannot see you as being content behind the camera. Because it seemed like you had a certain joy in performance.

MURPHY: I’m a ham. I’ve always been a ham. I had trouble in grade school for being a ham. I’m made of ham. I’m a walking ham.

KP: What kind of trouble would it cause in grade school?

MURPHY: Well, what kind of trouble does a ham get in? Calling attention to yourself, it’s in the report card, get sent to the principal’s office all the time. Making a nuisance in the class. Cutting up in the back of the room.

KP: So the teachers were not appreciative of your outgoing personality.

MURPHY: Teachers don’t like too many people who actually bust up the class. It doesn’t keep things moving the way it’s supposed to. I remember someone saying to me, “Do you think you’re going to be able to make a living making fun of things?”

KP: And you were only five at the time.

MURPHY: No, I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt. I was probably nine.

KP: Do you remember how you reacted to that statement?

MURPHY: I’m guessing that it was just pure fear, because at that time I was very frightened of authority figures. So I’d only do things behind their backs.

KP: You’re one of how many brothers?

MURPHY: I’ve got four brothers.

KP: So there was a lot of competition in the house.

MURPHY: Well, I suppose. I was smaller, so the competition was decided pretty quickly.

KP: Are they hams, as well, or was that your domain?

MURPHY: My brother Brian has a band called Arranmore, and they do Irish and folk and Americana sort of music. He’s been the front man for that band for many years, so he enjoys it in that way, but he’s not a clown. He’s just an entertaining musician. We all did time on some kind of stage in one fashion or another. But collectively they’re still the funniest people I know, I think. We get together and bust each other up so quickly, it’s wonderful.

KP: Did you pursue that inclination towards performance in high school, at all?

MURPHY: I was in the high school musicals, of course. I played Emile de Beckque in South Pacific… pissed me off because I wanted to play Luther Billis. They said, “No, Luther Billis doesn’t have to sing. You can sing. As a matter of fact, you’re the only one who can sing these songs.” It was a very small high school.

KP: Of six.

MURPHY: No, there were 98 people in my graduating class, I believe.

KP: When you have that small a pool…

MURPHY: I could hit the notes, and I didn’t have acne. So.

KP: Was singing also something that you were immediately drawn to?

MURPHY: That was both my parents’ influence. My dad loved swing music and barbershop quartet, and my mother loved musicals. They always had us singing when we were kids.

KP: How would you describe your pre-teen musical tastes?

MURPHY: Well, that’s odd, because again I had these older brothers and my older sister. So instead of listening to the 1910 Fruitgum Company, my brother Chris brought home Frank Zappa’s first album Freak Out, and this was… what was it, 1966? And here’s this bizarre album, and the first song is “Hungry Freaks, Daddy,” and it’s a double album, and it has bassoons and glockenspiels and just was delightful. It was just weird. One of my first albums when I had the money to buy it was Uncle Meat.

KP: What’s odd is, through the influence of your brothers, you gravitated toward something that actually incorporated at least a knowledge of the kind of music that your parents were fond of… You just don’t go into rock music using a glockenspiel…

MURPHY: True. Conversely, Zappa based a lot of what he did on the work of Edgar Varese, and folks like that, which is very atonal and difficult to listen to. And I think he liked to do that because it put people on edge. I remember him saying in his autobiography that he liked to play the low notes really loud because it always unsettled people more. The high notes would make them irritated and angry but the low notes would make them feel bad and they didn’t know why.

KP: So it was all about forcing people to question what they were listening to…

MURPHY: I guess you could say that. I don’t know. I was never that conscious of it. I just thought it was fun and weird. And I had my pathetically indulgent taste, too. I had Yes albums and Emerson, Lake & Palmer, and that sort of art rock stuff. I did get over that.

KP: Big ELO fan for a time?

MURPHY: No, not ELO. Too poppy for me.

KP: So it was never the pop direction you would go in.

MURPHY: No, I liked Steve Howe because he was a rocket on the guitar. I think Eddie Van Halen learned a lot from Steve Howe.

KP: Rick Wakeman?

MURPHY: Oh jeez, yes, I’m embarrassed to say I passed through my Rick Wakeman phase. It was like having malaria. I got over it. It took a while, but I got over it.

KP: But you never owned a cape…

MURPHY: Never owned a cape. I did own a leather hat.

KP: Which you’ve, through your book, made iconic as the ultimate symbol of a certain sad fellowship…

MURPHY: For me it is, yes. And it is true. That’s the other thread – I wrote about that in the book – is that punk rock saved my ass. It truly did.

KP: Did you know that at the time? Was it a conscious revelation?

MURPHY: It was just so much different than anything that I had experienced. In some ways it was new and scary and wonderful.

KP: What was the album that scared you the most?

MURPHY: Oh, jeez. Well, I’m working at this club, and this was… you know, it was the Midwest, so again – everything was behind everything else to a certain extent, but there’s kids who are launching themselves off the stage and they’re spitting at each other and they’re beating the shit out of each other on the dance floor.

KP: And you’re just timid with a leather hat in the corner?

MURPHY: No, at that time, I had discarded my leather hat. It was really the music more than anything else. You hear a band like The Stranglers, and it’s just so strong. It’s as if they’d say, “Let’s just take the biggest, loudest, creepiest, scariest elements of rock ‘n’ roll and push them to the extreme.” That’s how the New York Dolls struck me when I first heard them. They sounded a little bit… more than you want. Same thing with Iggy Pop. It’s like, “Okay, this is great. I’m really having a blast doing this.” And then suddenly the guy’s shaking his bony ass at you. That’s more than I want. We can ramp it down a little bit. The early punk scene always really pushed that edge, and it wasn’t necessarily about talent, it was just about anger.

KP: So was it the attitude or the music that struck you the hardest?

MURPHY: Ultimately it was the music, always the music. The Sex Pistols were really unpleasant to see on the stage, and they weren’t very good at all. But The Clash, dear god they were good. They were always good. They were wonderful.

KP: You mentioned a period where you saw just about everyone who went through the Midwest…

MURPHY: Yeah, and everybody did. Anybody who went across country would stop in Chicago, and quite often in Madison because it was a college town – and the school’s damn near 50,000 people, so they all came up.

KP: Did you feel – not to make a horrible pun – a sort of clash of cultures? This was a period when this was new to everybody…

MURPHY: Yeah. I guess so…

KP: Or was it just the people that knew and liked it were the ones who were there to see it…

MURPHY: Well, that’s what it was. You could tell. When Black Flag came to town and we were turning people away at the door and they were climbing through the windows, we knew something was going on. When U2 came it was the same thing. We wanted them to do another show, and they couldn’t. They actually played the 18 songs they knew and then played them again, because that’s all they had, but people were so hungry for it. It was wonderful.

KP: What was it like working at the club at that point?

MURPHY: It was a blast.

KP: I would assume it’s a unique experience in crowd control.

MURPHY: (laughs) Well, containment as much as anything else.

KP: Was there any time that you were afraid?

MURPHY: Well, I got lunged at a few times, and people trying to beat me up. They were generally drunk. The kids who were fighting on the dance floor, it was contained and limited to the dance floor. It was really sort of a ritualized sort of contained bit of adolescent boy’s island that stayed on the dance floor, and usually the worst that you get is a bloody lip or somebody’d get their hand stepped on or something like that. Or they’d miss him when he jumped off the stage, or that sort of thing. A couple of drunks lunged at me and tried to beat the hell out of me once or twice. We wrestled one guy out the door and he fell down the stairs. And this was a long flight of stairs. We thought he would have been dead by the time he got to the bottom. The nice thing about drunk people is they’re very flexible.

KP: Was he sober by the time he hit the bottom?

MURPHY: Oh, no, he was still quite drunk. But he had gotten the message and he said something like, “You don’t have to force me to leave, I’m going.” This is after he’d been hurled down the stairs.

KP: What would the cleanup process be like after an event?

MURPHY: Oh, thank god I wasn’t involved in that. No, no. It was quite the… they had sort of this indoor/outdoor carpet, the kind they put on boats. And then the massive dance floor. And you could pretty much hose the club down, and that’s pretty much what you needed to do.

KP: Just a big drain in the center.

MURPHY: Well, the bathrooms were definitely that way. Honestly, they’d take out the disinfectant and sponge everything and then hose it down with hot water and it was ready for the next night.

KP: Did you feel at the time that you were in a scene that was quickly to be co-opted and disappear?

MURPHY: Well, that’s what all the punks told me. They said everything that we do now is going to be commercial tomorrow. If it’s any good, somebody’s going to try to exploit it. That was simply the attitude. And even among the punks, it was…

KP: How many of them hoped for that?

MURPHY: Well you remember the thing about the hippies in San Francisco. Once the word “hippy” got out and used in the common nomenclature, they had a funeral to announce the death of the hippy – and that was in 1967, for crying out loud. So as soon as the word “punk” made it to Wisconsin it was already considered, by the people who consider themselves punk, to be passé.

KP: As soon as something hits the Midwest, it’s culturally dead.

MURPHY: Peoria. If it plays in Peoria, it’s not for me.

KP: What future did you perceive for yourself at that point?

MURPHY: Absolutely no clue.

KP: You were still going to school at this time, right?

MURPHY: Yeah, I was in grad school. I wanted to work in movies. I got myself as many different odd jobs as I could on little things, and I went to every film I could get my hands on, and I was in school to learn directing for film and television, as well as for the stage. That’s when I had a loose idea of what I might want to do. I had a great time. Francis Ford Coppola came to town. He was directing the rally before the Wisconsin Primary for Jerry Brown. And he decided to do it on live, nationwide television. He actually bought and donated the time to the Brown campaign and tried to do this live thing with all kinds of video effects. It was the most disastrous thing I’ve ever seen on live TV. Francis Ford Coppola was not a TV director.

KP: So it’s like SNL at Mardi Gras.

MURPHY: Right! (laughs) It was just a disaster. But I got to meet Barrie Osborne, the guy who eventually produced Lord of the Rings. I can understand how he could do those films. When I heard that it was Barrie Osborne, I said, “Oh, this’ll be no problem, because this guy could sleep through a hurricane.” He was just that calm and that poised. That was very admirable. Coppola was screaming like a lunatic and Barrie was just there trying to hold the whole thing together, very calm and very quiet.

KP: What was your opinion of the “Hollywood director”?

MURPHY: He was an asshole.

KP: Did you get any sense of the odd cheer about him, or just pure asshole?

MURPHY: No, just asshole, pretty much. I mean, I’m sure he is, but it sure wasn’t showing on the days that he was there.

KP: That was also during his incredibly self-destructive period.

MURPHY: I suppose you could call it that. He’d done One From the Heart, I believe. But it was so strange… he wanted to have a soup line set up so he could show pictures of the soup line. He didn’t really think that he needed to feed hungry people, he just wanted to have a soup line. There wasn’t any snow, and he wanted there to be snow. It was actually a beautiful day, but he wanted to bring snow machines in to make snow, since there wasn’t any. So he was sort of a parody of himself. It was Jerry giving his speech, and he’s trying… he put a green screen behind him. A huge green screen, and they put on the Capitol dome. He was projecting pictures of waving fields of wheat and folks in the crowd and farmers, and shit like that. And they didn’t get the key right, so people’s faces were popping through Jerry Brown’s forehead. I wish there was a tape of this. In fact, I should look on You Tube.

KP: This would have been at what time period?

MURPHY: That was the 1980 campaign.

KP: And you’re in college doing your master’s degree…

MURPHY: I was in Madison doing my master’s degree, yeah.

KP: Was school important to you?

MURPHY: Well, I went to the University of Utah for my undergraduate, which means that I spent all my time skiing. So, I really went to graduate school in order to complete my undergraduate education. Because I realized I finished college and I knew nothing about the media or about working in television or in films. So I really had to learn something.

KP: Your undergraduate was in journalism?

MURPHY: Yeah, ostensibly.

KP: Was that the only way you could get media classes, at that point?

MURPHY: Yeah. It was an incredibly easy degree, too. And it allowed me a lot of time to ski. I could take a lot of night classes, so it was great. I could get a season pass to Alta and ski all day long.

KP: Did you think, at the time, that you were sort of coasting through your college period?

MURPHY: (laughs) No, certainly not! I resent the implication, as a matter of fact.

KP: I apologize for any insinuation…

MURPHY: They say there are more important things than college, and when you go to the University of Utah and you go up into the Wasatch range, you realize that’s true.

KP: So when you got that piece of paper, did you think you’d earned it?

MURPHY: From the University of Utah?

KP: Yeah.

MURPHY: Hell no. Paid for it, but I didn’t earn it.

KP: Was the idea of getting an education to go get the master’s?

MURPHY: It’s funny… people say this all the time, and I realize it’s true – You want to be in the media, but you have no idea how to get there. It doesn’t make any sense. There’s the old work-in-the-mailroom thing, but what does that work for, one out of 10,000 people?

KP: And it depends on what part of the media you want to get into…

MURPHY: Yeah. I actually registered in proxy for a friend of mine at the University of Wisconsin and saw that campus and thought, “Wow, this is the real deal here.” It’s wonderful, and they had a public TV station right there on campus. And so it seemed like the perfect place, and as it turns out it was a great place to finish my undergraduate education, and get a master’s degree in the process.

KP: Knowing you could get some practical experience.

MURPHY: Right.

KP: But no skiing.

MURPHY: Let’s say the skiing in Wisconsin’s a few pegs down the ladder from skiing in Utah, and we’ll leave it at that. Much more horizontal.

KP: Was there a lot of student produced material, or was it all structured within the coursework, getting hold of that studio time? Were you guys able to futz around in the studio?

MURPHY: Yeah. At that time it was disappointing to find… well let’s put it this way – the hand held world was still brand new and very expensive. And so it was difficult to do field pieces in video. If you wanted to do that, there was still the film department, and they had wonderful film equipment. A nice equipment catalogue there, so you could get a Bolex camera, and a crystal-sync with a Nagra tape recorder, and go out in the field and make movies. You just had to take the right classes, and then it all depended on how much money you had to buy film stock. So you go without pizza and beer for a week, and you had enough to buy film stock to make movies… and a lot of people did it that way.

KP: Is there anything you made at that point that was purely your own project?

MURPHY: Sure. Nothing that I would ever share with anybody else in the universe ever again, and you can’t see it on You Tube because it’s in my closet somewhere. These are student pieces. I’m not Mozart. Nobody gives a shit about what I did in college.

KP: Someone will put out a DVD called The Lost Works of Kevin Murphy…

MURPHY: And the reason they’re lost is that they ought to be lost.

KP: You wouldn’t have a little Murphy Film Festival at some point?

MURPHY: I appreciate what Franz Kafka said – “Burn all of my letters, burn all of my notes, burn everything.”

KP: You realize no one listens to that.

MURPHY: (laughs) I guess by saying it it’s actually a pathetic invitation to burn everything.

KP: Just for that, we’re going to do a Kevin Murphy retrospective at Dragon Con…

MURPHY: Well, most of my student stuff is still in uncut 16 negative cut. One light reversal work print, and magnetic perforated film. So if you can put that together, I’d be impressed.

KP: Have you ever had the urge to go back and look?

MURPHY: No.

KP: Why keep it, then?

MURPHY: I haven’t thrown it away. I actually don’t know exactly where it is. It’s out in the garage somewhere. I actually have not seen it since I was in school, and that’s enough.

KP: There must be some curiosity.

MURPHY: No. I made it… I did it… I’m done.

KP: Where would your creative impulses lie? What would you go out and shoot? Story pieces, sketches?

MURPHY: When I was in school?

KP: Yeah.

MURPHY: They were mainly for classes, and so there was usually at least a genre or a style that we were trying to learn. We had a wonderfully bizarre – he’s still there – experimental filmmaker who was in the film department named JJ Murphy. No relation. And he’d give us a tremendous amount of freedom to go out and shoot, and also learn a lot of what you’d call less conventional film techniques. So I got a lot of exposure to that. And I always tried to have fun with it and, of course, subvert it as much as I could. The one that I enjoyed the most was when we had to do a sync sound piece and actually put together a whole complete short film. That was great fun. It was fictional. It was humorous. At least I intended it to be humorous.

KP: Would you say your creative slant has always been towards comedy?

MURPHY: Yes, definitely. Don’t have a serious bone in my body.

KP: Going through that program, did you feel, “Well, now I have a master’s degree in hand. What now?”…

MURPHY: Oh yeah.

KP: Were there any thoughts of leaving the Midwest?

MURPHY: Well, I did a stint in San Diego that didn’t go too well. I thought about working on… they were shooting Simon and Simon, and I just couldn’t bring myself to go down there and try to be a grunt on Simon and Simon. It didn’t thrill me enough, so I came back to the Midwest and ended up back in Madison, and that’s where the whole thing with WHA started.

KP: Did that seem like a logical place to ply some kind of trade?

MURPHY: Madison is a great town. It’s a very creative place. You look at one of those Chad Vader guys, who came from there, and it’s the kind of ode to the unconventional entertainment that seems to constantly come out of Madison.

KP: This would lead into the various people that would assemble a hotbed of comedy, in many regards.

MURPHY: It’s kind of like Austin, Texas – only with bad weather. All kinds of shit’s going on there at all times, and a lot of creative stuff, and a lot of very smart people, and they found a place to congregate where other people won’t hassle them and they could be weird in their own right and they don’t have to worry about being weird.

KP: Were you aware of the comedy scene at that point?

MURPHY: You mean, like, standup?

KP: Yeah…

MURPHY: I didn’t have much interest in standup. I didn’t want to do standup. I never had the inclination to do standup. I thought you were crazy to do standup. And I’ve met so few people who are good at it. Now, when I came to Minneapolis, then I started meeting people who were really good at it. And, as you said, made a difference because they were really entertaining. I mean, in a small town like Madison, you either get the huge guys who play the theaters downtown, or you get the local people. And they just weren’t that funny. But Minneapolis actually was a place where a lot of people gravitated to work. There were, at the time, several worthy comedy clubs. That’s where I ended up meeting all these clowns on Mystery Science Theater.

KP: What was the initial pitch for doing the mock news pieces for KTMA?

murphy2007-07-18-06.jpgMURPHY: Well, Jim and I put our heads together and said, “What would be fun? What would we both enjoy doing?” The genesis of that is simply that we had both spent many years working in news, in television journalism. A lot of what we did at WHA was go out with these news crews and shoot field pieces for their news magazine shows. And that was the whole genesis. And there was one fellow, whose name I’m not going to mention because he’s a sweet man and I don’t know if he knows that we were making fun of him… That was sort of the personality basis for Bob Bagadonuts.

KP: So there actually is a real world counterpart.

MURPHY: (laughs) Well, he’s an amalgam, but there’s one in particular.

KP: You say that as a way to cover…

MURPHY: Well, I don’t want to hurt his feelings. I really like the guy and I don’t think he ever knew that we were making fun of him. So I’ll leave it at that.

KP: I’m sure there are some redeeming qualities to Bob…

MURPHY: Well yeah, of course. He was clueless but likeable. He was never an asshole, that’s the thing.

KP: He’s very much an SCTV-ish character.

MURPHY: Yes, I guess you’d say that. And that’s a compliment, I’d say.

KP: Was that automatically the go-to, “We’re creating this and I want to perform in it…”?

MURPHY: No, it was because we couldn’t afford to hire anybody. And Jim didn’t shoot. He was a sound guy when he was at WHA. So we’d figure it out. We learned the camera together. I’d done more video when I was there, so we sort of taught each other. And when I wasn’t shooting, he was.

KP: How did it feel to perform in those pieces?

MURPHY: It wasn’t the first time I’d done anything like that. It was just a lot of fun.

KP: And to know this was going out to an audience of 10s of 10s….

MURPHY: Well, that actually made it sort of comforting and safe.

KP: I’m assuming you have copies of all the stuff you did for KTMA…

MURPHY: Probably.

KP: Including that travel agency commercial?

murphy2007-07-18-07.jpgMURPHY: Oh god. Again, they’re somewhere either in the closet or in the garage. I’m not nostalgic. I really hate nostalgia.

KP: Why?

MURPHY: I think it’s stupid and pointless. It’s worse than prognosticating, which is another thing I think is simply mental masturbation.

KP: Do you have a problem with nostalgia on your own work? Because you’re the one who just looked up Diver Dan on You Tube…

MURPHY: (laughs) I think that’s a unique form of nostalgia, because it was so dumb.

KP: Now you’re trying to parse this…

MURPHY: (laughs) Of course I am, are you kidding? I’ll parse and rationalize all day, bitch!

KP: (laughs) Do you think it’s just the difference about being precious about your own work as opposed to that of others?

MURPHY: Yeah, I think that’s definitely it. I’m not self-nostalgic. I don’t keep things. I have too many things. If I had everything I accumulated over my life, I’d have to buy another house.

KP: At what point for you did Joel and MST enter the picture?

MURPHY: Well, we were doing these Bob Bagadonuts pieces, and they were really fun, but they were really, really hard. I mean, single camera work and there were two of us doing everything. I mean everything.

KP: Was that the same method even for something as big as those New Year’s Eve pieces?

MURPHY: Well, you know, we got the whole station involved because that was live TV, and live TV’s like heroin. You can’t get enough of it once you try it. It’s so much fun.

KP: What was the worst disaster that happened to you on live TV?

MURPHY: I forgot what I was doing next while I was on camera. I had a little IFB and I said, “For the love of god, what am I doing next?” And then Jim told me. So it worked out really well. So we’d get the whole station involved and we’d get all our friends involved in the New Year’s Eve thing, so those were a lot easier and a lot more fun. But the grind of doing single camera comedy, it’s a lot of work. I think that was part of it, is that we wanted to branch out from there. Both Jim and I. And we started talking to the folks in the standup community, Joel being one of them, and he came in with the idea, and the rest is already written down somewhere else.

KP: What was the station’s view of these projects?

MURPHY: We got press, so it wasn’t bad. And we didn’t cost them a whole lot of money, so we were able to sneak things in with very meager budgets because we didn’t pay ourselves more than our salaries and we didn’t pay anybody outside very much at all.

KP: Was there any oversight that would come in and go, “What are you guys doing?”

MURPHY: Yeah. The station manager liked us. He was a sweet fellow, and he liked us both, and I think he liked the idea of… when we did the first Melon Drop, it was probably the first time the station got any press outside of just the local business columns, the business pages. It was in the entertainment pages and the guy loved the show, so he wrote something really nice about it. That’s currency for a TV station, I think.

KP: Did you see a shelf life for the way KTMA was being run?

MURPHY: God no. They had reruns and bad movies. They think it’s cool to get Andy of Mayberry. They thought that was really exciting.

KP: What were the promos like that you would produce for things like that?

MURPHY: Oh, it was dreadful. They called them donuts, because it’d be the same on the beginning and the end and then you put in something about the episode in between, and that was the hole that you’d fill. That stuff was a grind. The commercials were a grind. Doing the Ax-Man Surplus Store or the Blaine Flea Market, or the endless used cars and discount furniture places…

KP: How much leeway would you take with those pieces?

MURPHY: As much as we could, which still meant very little. Sometimes you just had to get them done. The salesmen, the ad force, decided that a cool thing to do was if you bought a certain amount of ad space, you’d get a free commercial. Yeah, so we were run ragged. (laughs) It was awful.

KP: How would you describe your average day?

MURPHY: Half in the field, half in the studio or the control room putting together ads. And then doing promos. They were long days. And then we’d have to wedge in any of the extracurricular stuff on top of that. Mystery Science Theater was pretty much extracurricular.

KP: How much were you paid for that?

MURPHY: I wasn’t paid any more than my salary – which was the most I’d ever made, but it still wasn’t a whole hell of a lot.

KP: So, basically, it was considered part of your job to do these things…

MURPHY: Yeah.

KP: It wasn’t an extra thing that you were doing…

MURPHY: Well, it was an extra thing, but it was a labor of love.

KP: It fell within the purview of your paid duties.

MURPHY: Right.

KP: If you chose to waste some more of your time, that was your choice…

MURPHY: Right. The station manager would come back and see the mess we’d made out of Styrofoam and junk and jingle his keys in his pockets and shake his head and chuckle and say, “You crazy guys, what are you up to now?” Then he’d walk away. I don’t think he ever saw the show. But the station was going bankrupt while all this was going on.

KP: Was it known that the days were numbered?

MURPHY: No. It was actually after we finished the show that we started hearing the rumblings, and that was when Jim and Joel shopped it up to New York and tried to get it going, because Jim was saying we’d better get this going because we’re not going to have jobs in another six months, and that’s what it turned out to be. Weeks after we started at Best Brains, the station went bankrupt.

KP: What was the genesis and formation of, “We’re actually going to incorporate as Best Brains…” like?

MURPHY: Well, that was Jim’s and Joel’s when it started, so I wasn’t privy to that. They just decided to make a company. It was Joel’s idea to begin with and Jim was the one who’d produced it, so they were essentially the owners of the thing and declared it as such. Joel had the New York agent, and he had the connections. He was already doing some stuff at the Comedy Channel. You remember, at this time, Joel had already had and come back from a pretty successful standup career on both coasts. He did Saturday Night Live and David Letterman and all those things you’re supposed to do when you’re in the pipeline to become the next cool standup. Then I think it sort of sickened him, so he quit and came back home and started small again, which was probably pretty smart for him.

KP: What other options were you exploring at that point, if things were not going to happen?

MURPHY: I don’t know.

KP: Were you aware that things might be coming to a close?

MURPHY: Yeah, absolutely. It seemed to be sort of natural. It seemed like we were going to get something going with Mystery Science Theater. It was just a matter of negotiation. And so, as the station started to look a little scary, we just pressed a little harder to get Mystery Science Theater up and running. And we did that. In a matter of about eight weeks, I got married, went to Central America for a honeymoon, came back, we built the sets, and had the first show delivered to HBO. So it was a pretty quick transition once it actually happened.

KP: So that was an intense period of time…

MURPHY: Oh yeah. Again, it was like summer camp.

KP: During the KTMA shoots, what would be your responsibilities?

MURPHY: I’d shoot it and sort of supervise the set and supervise the post. Along with Jim.

KP: What were the challenges of doing a single camera shoot like that?

MURPHY: Well, that was easy. You didn’t move the camera. Mystery Science Theater was always a very, very easy show to shoot and produce. The oddest technical thing was getting the silhouette going and getting the little doors going, and that was just a matter of video math, knowing which screen to key through which hole at which time. Something an editor can figure out in five minutes.

KP: And the films were directly out of the library, so there was no real selection process.

MURPHY: Well, there was. I mean, we’d screen them, and say, “This looks dumb.”

KP: But there was no writing process that went into it.

MURPHY: Only the sketches.

KP: How quickly would an episode be put together?

MURPHY: Well, let’s see, Trace and Josh and Joel would come in and we’d sit down, and at that time I wasn’t doing a lot of writing because I’d be doing other things during the day or setting up for the show. They’re write the sketches in the morning, and then they’d go to lunch and then come back and shoot the show in the afternoon. So it was done in one day. And, as a matter of fact, for a while there we were almost doing it in real time, because the editing process – we just didn’t have the time to do it, and at 5:00 we had to turn the cameras around to shoot Saturday Night at Ringside, the wrestling show.

KP: This was a very tiny studio space?

MURPHY: It was pretty small.

KP: How would you compare it to what you eventually had at Best Brains?

MURPHY: Best Brains was roughly twice as big, which was still pretty small.

KP: What was your initial impression of Trace and Josh, when they came in?

MURPHY: I thought they were incredibly funny, and the three of those guys – Josh, Trace, and Joel – meshed very well together. It was just great fun to see how they worked together. They were always a great team, the three of them.

KP: But you felt firmly ensconced as a behind the scenes person?

MURPHY: Well, I loved doing it, and I knew how to do it. None of those guys knew how to do it, so somebody had to do it. It was a contribution I could make at that time.

KP: Then the transition to Best Brain happened…

MURPHY: Mm-hmm.

KP: At what point did you start writing?

MURPHY: Right away. That was one of the things I really wanted to do and asked to be on that crew, so I started writing right away. I couldn’t write all the time, again because there were so many dang things going on, and I was editing the show, as well as shooting it.

KP: You were editing during the first season, as well?

MURPHY: Yeah. That changed quickly as it could…

KP: When was an editor brought in?

MURPHY: I really don’t remember. I think it was for the second season… Well, we brought in a camera guy, is what we did, and that was really great. We had to because I was now running a puppet, and I couldn’t do both. Now that I think of it, I think we did bring that guy in during the first season – but again, it’s a fog. A long time ago. That was 20 years ago.

KP: Does it feel like 20 years ago?

MURPHY: Some days. When the humidty’s up (laughs)

KP: It’s literally, what… Next year it will be 20 years since the first rumblings of putting it all together…

MURPHY: It’s true.

KP: I’m sure you’ll fire a gun into the air, or light off a firecracker to commemorate the moment… Maybe some tequila…

MURPHY: Blow up the puppet…

KP: Now, I’m curious about that… No one I’ve talked to has kept a puppet… Even though you’re not a sentimental person, I’d think you would have kept the puppet…

MURPHY: I’m telling you man, did you ever see Magic?

KP: Yes…

MURPHY: Okay, I don’t have to say anything more.

KP: Trace was pretty intense about not having some puppet in the room, with its eyes following him…

MURPHY: Well, exactly.

KP: Bill seemed to want one, though…

MURPHY: (laughs) Well, you know, Trace is Crow, pretty much. Joel sort of hobbled together this odd thing with fixed eyes, but Trace truly breathed life into that thing from the outset. I think it was probably a lot more intimate and creepy for Trace than it would have been for Bill. Not taking anything away from Bill.

KP: I think Trace likened it to being like him watching himself…

MURPHY: (laughs) Like a Magritte painting, then…

KP: Or just a velvet painting of Crow, where the eyes follow him. Obviously you get presented with all these fan-made Toms to hold at conventions…

MURPHY: I do, and I hold them and have my picture taken, and I’m always amazed at the ingenuity that people have when they put these things together.

KP: Did it surprise you when these things started appearing?

MURPHY: Everything about the show surprised me. Everything. Its success, its continued success, the cult following, the conventions, the fact that people would build puppets that not only looked like them but were exact down to every last part – a complete replica of the puppet…

KP: Am I correct in understanding that the puppets couldn’t be copyrighted?

MURPHY: Well, the characters can.

KP: Right, but as far as the design…

MURPHY: I’m a little light in my puppet law.

KP: Has anyone tried to give you a puppet at one of the conventions?

MURPHY: No, they want me to hold it and have my picture taken with it, and then they want it right back. And they want me to work the mouth, too, and do the voice.

KP: Do you?

MURPHY: If they pay me a thousand dollars. (laughs) I’d consider it…

KP: Done and done.

MURPHY: Wouldn’t you??

KP: For an envelope full of cash, I certainly would. I’d sound like shit, but I’d do it. You know what? For $100, I’d operate a Tom Servo…

MURPHY: (laughs) Why not?

KP: I could be the cut-rate Tom Servo. When you can’t afford the right guy, you get me.

MURPHY: Servo Whore!

KP: Exactly! I’m just fulfiliing a need Does that mean I have your blessing?

MURPHY: There you go…

KP: Now I’m the officially endorsed Servo Whore. Do you miss the process?

MURPHY: I miss the company. It was really a great group. Continues to be great people. And we came together and it was one of those things.

KP: Did it feel like a bubble?

MURPHY: Everybody’s sort of painfully aware that nothing lasts forever. But you never think of that while it’s going on, just when it’s over. And those change all the way through. But in general it was always a good group to work with, and there were always fun people. I don’t regret a minute of it.

KP: Was the decision quick and painless as far as a transition when Josh left, and you took up Tom Servo? Bill mentioned there was an audition process for Crow…

MURPHY: There was. There wasn’t one for Servo. I just went in and talked to Jim and Joel and said, “Hey, I think I could do this and I’d like to have a shot.” And they said, “Okay.” It was pretty easy.

KP: Was anything difficult about that transition?

MURPHY: Well, I was nervous about it. I was about to perform in this show that was starting to get some press attention, and I was replacing a character that had already been established.

KP: Did you feel the momentum building on the show?

murphy2007-07-18-05.jpgMURPHY: It was really like the second or third season…I forget when it happened, but Tom Shales wrote a glowing review in The Washington Post, and then the press started getting wind of the whole thing, and that really sort of propelled it. The thing that always got me from the very beginning is when we put the phone number on the screen and then the next day the answering machine would be jammed.

KP: Well, everyone’s seen the introduction of that on the KTMA episodes that have been preserved… Except for the mythical first three episodes, which nobody has… you probably do.

MURPHY: I don’t.

KP: It’s in a box in the garage. There’s probably a ‘bot in the corner.

MURPHY: I know that I didn’t bring a puppet home. I did that intentionally. Jim actually asked me, “Would you like to keep a puppet?” And I said, “Thank you, no.”

KP: What was your rationale?

MURPHY: Like I said, Anthony Hopkins in Magic.

KP: What’s it going to do to you?

MURPHY: It’s just weird. I wouldn’t call a puppet a transitional object, but at that point it would seem like that.

murphy2007-07-18-08.jpg

KP: Did the character become a solid entity to you over the years, as far as that characterization you developed?

MURPHY: Meaning…

KP: Did you feel it develop into, “This has become a whole character to me…”?

MURPHY: I think so, definitely. And that I attribute to the writers as a whole.

KP: You being one of them.

MURPHY: Yes, definitely. I got to sort of put the actual performance spin on it, but it’s amazing when you have that many people give their perspective of what Servo’s personality is, or any of the characters – what you end up with is fuller. A little bit more schizophrenic, perhaps, but fuller.

KP: How would you describe the atmosphere at Best Brains?

MURPHY: High school with money, man. Once again. We’re playing Doom on our network when we’re supposed to be working. Microsoft had just come out with the text-to-voice thing where you could type something down and have a robot voice say it. So we’d type up these things and then broadcast it, some foul thing about somebody else in the building, over the PA system. We had odd celebrities coming through and taking tours.

KP: Who were the odd celebrities who would come through?

MURPHY: I shouldn’t say odd. I guess you’d call them particular types of celebrities. Like, Roger McGuinn was a big fan of the show. I just love that, because he was a hero of mine. He’s another guy I listened to.

KP: Did he take a tour?

MURPHY: He did take a tour. And I got to sit in and watch him record a song, which was pretty thrilling. He recorded a song with the Jay Hawks, and it was fucking great, it was wonderful.

KP: So, you’re saying there were perks.

MURPHY: Are you kidding? I got to piss next to Leonard Nimoy. Things like this. I got kissed on the mouth by Kim Cattrall. I also met Ray Bradbury and Kurt Vonnegut.

KP: Did you ever have an encounter with Vonnegut outside of the rather awkward one you described in the MST book?

MURPHY: No.

KP: Did you entertain any thought of walking over to his table?

MURPHY: No. I knew then that he might call security.

KP: Or he might say, “You passed the test. Sit down.”

MURPHY: I’ll never know, will I?

KP: Are there any people that just completely shocked you to find out that they enjoyed the show?

MURPHY: I was stunned and floored and flattered… Dan Fogelberg, remember him?

KP: Oh yeah…

MURPHY: He was a fan of the show. He was, like, a real fan. And he invited us all to go to a show, and none of us could make it. It was just so embarrassing.

KP: I’m sure you were all, “Oh, I’ve got a dentist appointment…”

MURPHY: I would have gone. He’d gone from his fun folk rocky phase to his sort of gassy music phase, so I think I wasn’t as impressed anymore. Nobody went, and I think he left a little bit dispirited.

KP: That he had somehow sunk to a level of celebirty below a cow town puppet show that didn’t have time for him…

MURPHY: (laughs) Yeah…

KP: I’m sure he harbors that horrible, horrible hurt to this day…

MURPHY: (laughs). The other big thrill was talking to Frank Zappa on the phone.

KP: How did that call come about?

MURPHY: We got a call from Wally Nicita at Warner Brothers. Wally went on to have, and continues to have, a terrific career as a producer and exec. She was putting this together for Frank. She was a friend of Franks. I think that was part of it, was he had a script. A very, very weird script. You’d expect nothing less. He was dying. He was not even a year away. And he knew he was dying, and he just wanted to have as much fun as he could in his last few months. Then Wally called us up and said, “Frank Zappa has this script and he has watched you guys and he thinks you’re out of your gourds, and he’d like you to consider developing it into a movie.” And I said, “Yeah, uh-huh, that’s neat, that sounds really cool. Who are you again?” She said, “Wally Nicita from Warner Brothers.” And I said, “Okay, tell you what. Why don’t you have Frank call us.” She sounded a little put out, and she said, “Well, I’ll see what I can do.” She hung up, and a half an hour later, over the PA I hear, “Kevin, Frank Zappa’s on the phone for you.”

KP: At what point did your stomach completely go in a knot?

MURPHY: Right then. Absolutely. I didn’t know what to say. I wanted to say, “I started listening to you… it was in summer in Lake Geneva, Wisconsin, and my brother brought home Freak Out and I’d never heard anything so fucking weird in my life.”

KP: Did you say that?

MURPHY: In so many words, but the first thing he said is, “You know, when I knew that you guys were cool was when I turned on the show, and there’s Joel, and he’s wearing a clown outfit and he’s roasting a puppet over an open fire.” And he said, “I knew you guys were too fucking weird for words.” So we had a little mutual compliment for each other.

KP: That’s an incredible compliment, coming from him.

MURPHY: It was! It truly blew me away. And he said, “I’ve got this script, and it’s political and weird and I’d like you guys to consider doing it.” Then he sent the script and he sent some cassettes of some music that he had in mind to do the score for the thing. The essential idea was wonderful. He wanted to completely do the soundtrack and the score first, and then lip synch the entire movie. It was going to sort of be The Queen of Outer Space – you know, the spider lives in a cave on the moon?

KP: Right…

MURPHY: Except told from the spider’s point of view.

KP: How much of the music had he demoed at that point?

MURPHY: Well, it was a lot of songs that he’d either released or was just doing on his beautiful synthesizer machine. At the time he was pretty sophisticated into sampling and sequencing before a lot of people were, so he had stacks and stacks and volumes with music and scores already written. And they were released because he had these contractual obligations. and albums came out like Sleep Dirt and Studio Tan. Then they had some of these orchestral things that he’d done, and they were just wonderful. Sort of splendid weird pageantry. This is what he had in mind. He had already written “Spider of Destiny,” which was one of the songs on there. The spider becomes a sex slave of the queen of outer space, and that’s part of the story. And it just got weirder and weirder and weirder from there. It would have been wonderful. He had actually talked to Terry Gilliam about doing it, too. That would have been quite a combination.

KP: So, already you’re in this rarified air…

MURPHY: Yeah.

KP: What happened after your phone call at BBI?

MURPHY: It was a weird time, and the timing couldn’t have been worse, because this is when Joel was sort of going through the period of determining to leave the show.

KP: Was it known that he was making that decision?

MURPHY: It was being discerned by him, and what that would mean. He had said he didn’t want to be the star of the show for very long, and he was true to his world.

KP: What was the return call back to Frank?

MURPHY: Well, I talked to Frank and asked him to give us a little time, here. We’d like to consider it, but it’s nothing that we can move on right away. And he said, “Well, think about it, because I’d love you to do it,” and that’s when he sent the script and the tapes. We talked to Wally again, and she said, “If you can do it, this is the time to go, because Frank is not a healthy man.” We really, sadly, had to sort of walk away from it because, at that time, we didn’t know where we were going, much less trying to develop a script for Frank Zappa.

KP: Would you say that’s a regret?

MURPHY: It would have been fun. I don’t regret it. There’s very few things I regret. But it would have been fun.

KP: At least you know that you were part of something that impressed one of the people that was quite a formative influence in your youth.

MURPHY: Absolutely, yeah. That was quite fun.

KP: Do you still have the tapes?

MURPHY: Of the music?

KP: Yeah.

MURPHY: Those I have. And I think I know where they are.

KP: When was the last time you listened to those?

MURPHY: (laughs) About 10 years ago.

KP: How do you treat going back and listening to music?

MURPHY: That’s different.

KP: So that’s not nostalgia to you.

MURPHY: I don’t know. Well, there is music that is nostalgic. For me, even in pop music, there are songs that are timeless. When I listen to certain Beatles songs, they don’t remind me of a period – I just like the music. I listen to Bob & Ray not because they remind me of the good old golden days of radio. I could give a shit about the good old golden days of radio. Bob and Ray are funny. I think there’s a difference there. I don’t sit there and say, “Boy, I remember when I was in my pajamas as a child sitting on the couch with a cup of Nestlé’s Quik…” I don’t give a shit about that. It’s funny and it’s enjoyable of its own right. There’s a certain sort of cheese factor built into that.

KP: How do you listen to music? Do you have an iPod?

MURPHY: I still have LPs. I still have a lot of CDs. I actually have a lot of cassette tapes, and I have converted most of them onto my iPod.

KP: I’m sure, because of the amount of traveling you do, its nice to have an iPod.

MURPHY: I love the iPod. For me, it’s like the coolest thing built in the last century. It’s like the mechanical pencil. It’s just one of these things that it seems like life is possibly at least more fun with it in existence.

KP: Are you a shuffle person or a playlist person?

MURPHY: I’m a playlist person. Although I shuffle my playlists. Does that make any sense?

KP: Yes. So you have set lists, but they could come up in random order.

MURPHY: Yes, I do.

KP: How do you normally program a list? By artists or moods?

MURPHY: Has to be sort of moods. I’ve got a mix for baking bread, I’ve got a mix for putting the fishing boat behind the truck and taking it to the lake.

KP: Is it one you will always play for that action?

MURPHY: No. Sometimes I’ll play the bread making list while driving the boat to the lake.

KP: Makes a great loaf.

MURPHY: (laughs)

KP: Are these eclectic, or would you say that they fit within the context of what you were intending for the playlist?

MURPHY: Well, playlists are generally eclectic, aren’t they? Because they reflect the personality of the person that put it together.

KP: Yes, but you can still have a theme that runs through a playlist.

MURPHY: I suppose. I guess you could say that. Let me take a look at this thing here. I have a bunch of different playlists that I take with me when I go to Mexico, and certain ones that I like to play at certain times of day. It’s that sort of weirdness. But right next to… let’s see. Right next to Marc Ribot is Thievery Corporation. Right next to Buckwheat Zydeco is Senor Coconut. Make sense out of that.

KP: There’s a sense to it.

MURPHY: I’ve got Cannonball Adderley and Sergio Mendes. That’s quite a combination.

KP: Now that’s a one-two punch.

MURPHY: They’re playing together.

KP: Are you a one iPod family?

MURPHY: This is going to sound so fucking pretentious I could die. I have two. I don’t have more than two, though. I have one that I keep at home, and one that I travel with and take into potentially harmful situations.

KP: That’s the expendable one…

MURPHY: Yes, it’s the one in the dirty, beat-up case. That’s the one that goes to Mexico with me.

KP: Are these video, or music iPods?

MURPHY: I got the big guns for the one I take and watch movies with, and travel with, and back up files.

KP: How different would writing the book have been if the video iPod was in existence at that time?

MURPHY: Not much. For me, the video iPod’s kind of like having a DVD player. For me, the book was all about the public exhibition of a motion picture. That’s sort of my definition of cinema, there.

KP: But as one of your fallback positions, is what I mean…

MURPHY: Yeah, it would have been an odd decision to make. If I could find a way to project the iPod, it would have been fine. I might have taken that. There was something more tactile and more cinematic at the time about bringing a projector with me.

KP: I remember how heartbreaking it was to read that the Italian portion of the book, when your fallback options broke down…

MURPHY: Yeah, it was a pretty low point.

KP: And you conveyed it effectively through the writing.

MURPHY: Thank you.

KP: I remember writing you an email at the time, that the book had rekindled my interest in going to the theaters.

MURPHY: I love that.

KP: Which I’m sorry to say has died…

MURPHY: (laughs) I guess I’d better get back out there.

KP: All we have are the multiplexes in this area. Although I’ve always thought that if someone were to open a single screen theater in this area with classic programming, it would take off. Sadly, it’s not cheap to open a theater.

MURPHY: Nope.

KP: Maybe that would be something to tackle – what people can do in their home towns to start that sort of thing…

MURPHY: It certainly is possible. There are a lot of small towns around that have defunct theaters that have either become community centers or just sitting empty. There’s one not far from here where my partner Janes’s family is from. The Cameo theater. It used to be one, they split it into three, and now it’s just sitting empty.

KP: They did that here. They closed two of the old style multiplexes, the three screen theaters, to open a 16-plex. But the theaters are sitting empty.

MURPHY: Right.

KP: You’re not going to get a projector back in there cheap. But I guess if there were cheap digital presentations…

MURPHY: That’s true, but the bottom line is you’ve got to love it. You’ve got to really, really love it because it’s… you turn a hobby into a career and suddenly you realize you didn’t really much like your hobby, and that can be a nightmare.

KP: Has anyone presented that to you?

MURPHY: Actually, yeah. One of my brothers-in-law said, “Why don’t you think about getting a loan and opening this theater down in Owatonna?”

KP: What was your initial gut reaction to that?

MURPHY: I think it’s an excellent idea. I don’t know if I’m the guy to do it. I’m not a businessman. It would take a businessman, even if it is a film lover or a lover of independent film, or whatever. I think it would take a businessman to make it run. It’s just the way this country works.

KP: Spending that year traveling the world and going to theaters, what was the biggest revelation you had about the theater experience?

MURPHY: I think it’s still very cool. The movie depends on the theater and the theater depends on the movie, and the experience depends on both being something good or interesting. And it’s not always going to be that way. Sometimes you simply just go into the movies. And I still know a lot of people who just like to go out quote-unquote “to the movies” because it’s a past time. My own brother Brian and his wife go out to the movies about once a week. They just enjoy it. It’s their way of getting away and doing something. And he’s a lot less picky. I’m a snob, I’m a big-ass snob, and he’s a lot less picky about the movies he watches because he likes going to the movies instead of sitting at home and watching a movie.

KP: What are movies that you absolutely, positively, of your own accord will not go near?

MURPHY: Oh, hang on, what’s opening this week? (laughs)

KP: Last week was Shrek 3.

MURPHY: Yeah, I haven’t gone. It’s funny – I haven’t had any interest in seeing that or any of the big films.

KP: You were incredibly critical of the first Harry Potter film and Columbus’s treatment of that. How do you view the films after they shuffled off Columbus and brought actual filmmakers in?

MURPHY: I love Cuaron. I’ve always liked Cuaron. I like what he does with movies. That one I enjoy, I think, more than any of the others. I think it’s because of Cuaron.

KP: Did that set the reset button on your view of the franchise?

MURPHY: No. On that particular film, I’d say. I tried to get involved in the Harry Potter books, but they’re not written for me. They don’t engage me like they do other people, and that’s fine. I appreciate the craft and the whole charming English boarding school world, but I’d rather read Dickens, or Neal Stephenson, for god’s sake.

KP: Was there any franchise that….

MURPHY: No. (laughs) I can’t think of one. If we had The Thin Man, it would be a whole different thing. But we don’t have The Thin Man – we get Ocean’s 11.

KP: I’m sure we’ll have some kind of remake of The Thin Man.

MURPHY: I’m sure we will, but it won’t be The Thin Man. When I say that, I mean here was a series that had some fun to it, some charm, and it seemed like they weren’t just making them to make them. Maybe that’s just my own cynical attitude, but there are TV series that end up being more interesting.

KP: You enjoyed the first Lord of the Rings film…

MURPHY: Oh, I loved them all!

KP: That was a franchise.

MURPHY: No it wasn’t a franchise, it was a series of three films.

KP: In Hollywood, that’s called a franchise…

MURPHY: I think of a franchise as something that’s open ended. They could make Spider-Man 12. That’s a franchise. They could make Ocean’s 25. The notion of that becoming a franchise is absurd. I don’t know if you’d call it a closed world, but it’s a work in and of itself, The Lord of the Rings. Anything else would be derivative, I suppose.

KP: What is it like doing a RiffTrax with Mike on a film that you actually enjoyed?

MURPHY: It’s a blast. It’s just a blast. It’s easier. I said Mystery Science Theater was easy – it was easy, and it was also very difficult in some ways, because it was making television, and television’s always complicated. But RiffTrax is incredibly easy. The writing is always the hardest part. And long movies are difficult to write. Like, the Star Wars movies nearly killed us both. When Bill joins us, it’s always a lot easier. When three of us are working on it, it’s much easier. But the writing is the hardest part of it all, and trying to make these things fun for an audience is the hardest part. But once you go into the studio, it’s just a blast.

KP: Is it a different feeling knowing it’s not characters critiquing these films, it’s Kevin Murphy saying these things?

MURPHY: I suppose there’s a certain liability in there, because there’s a safety with hiding behind a character. Because you truly can hide behind it. You’ve got a puppet in your hand – not only are you portraying a character, you’re portraying a puppet character. So nobody even sees you.

KP: Even Mike was portraying a puppet character…

MURPHY: In a way, I suppose he was. But then when you consider the silhouette, then you remove it at another level.

KP: So you have these layers of distance that you can hide behind…

MURPHY: Yeah. There are several sets of filters between you and what’s going on. I think that’s at the heart of the success of Mystery Science Theater, is that we had these wonderful characters, and people gave them license to make fun of the movies. So yeah, we’re setting ourselves up to be knocked down hard. I think for me, what we found over the course of doing Mystery Science Theater is that the characters and the idea were what really got it going. And I think what kept it going was the fact that these great characters were having so much fun with the films, so in turn the audience was too. The writing is a huge part of what kept that show going for as long as it did. Otherwise it might have been a passing novelty, and once the novelty wore off, what is there for it besides good writing?

KP: Right. Which you’ve seen with the many imitators that have tried to snatch away that idea over the years.

MURPHY: Yeah, I suppose, but I do enjoy the Sklar Brothers, I’ve got to say. They do the show on ESPN…

KP: Oh yes, Cheap Seats…

MURPHY: Yes. I enjoy the way that they’re the most idiosyncratic pair of comics I’ve ever seen. And when you see them on stage… (laughs)

KP: But obviously they know what their influences are, since you guys did the appearance with them.

MURPHY: Yeah.

KP: Which must have been odd, after that many years, to go back into it.

MURPHY: It was fun.

KP: Did it feel weird to know that you were Tom Servo again?

MURPHY: When we did the thing on Cheap Seats?

KP: Yeah.

MURPHY: Yes, that was a little weird. But we didn’t actually have to pick up the puppets. I think Jim just borrowed silhouettes from old projects.

KP: Yeah, I noticed things weren’t in sync…

MURPHY: Yeah. Just had to do the voice.

KP: But it shows that people don’t pay attention unless you actually see the difference that you guys did bring to the characters, even in the silhouette sequence.

MURPHY: Yeah. The characters were, like I said… it separates you just from being a smart ass watching a movie. The only way that I think we can do RiffTrax now is the fact that we have this history of having done it on Mystery Science Theater.

KP: It’s clear that the camaraderie is still there.

MURPHY: Yeah. That’s what makes it fun, is that we always had fun playing off each other and working off each other, so it works out well. We’ve got a good sort of jazz shorthand.

KP: It also sounds like it’s pretty open ended, and open to people coming in. Mike was going to ask Trace about doing one.

MURPHY: That would be fun…

KP: Some of the rough cuts of MST3K have leaked out – particularly of the theater segments – so it has your banter in between the breaks during the recording…

MURPHY: Where the hell do you find this, You Tube?

KP: They might be on You Tube. Some of the bit torrent sites have the full rough cuts.

MURPHY: Oh wow.

KP: Apparently, when they had a garage sale when BBI closed, they sold a box of what they thought were blank video tapes, but they were the rough cuts. I think there’s two Joel episodes, the complete theater rough cuts. There’s three from season 10 – including the final episode, which has a lot of nice quips about how you feel about Sci-Fi.

MURPHY: That stuff doesn’t belong out there!

KP: It’s not their fault that they bought a box of tapes…

MURPHY: (laughs) No it ain’t.

KP: And I guess there’s an entire tape of host segment rehearsals, including 35 minutes of season one host segment rehearsals, which are unique…

MURPHY: (laughs) Yeah, I’ll bet they are!

KP: Full of a lot of Josh f-bombs.

MURPHY: Oh yeah, he liked to toss the effenheimer around the room.

KP: But as far as the camaraderie goes, there’s one segment where there’s an extended break halfway through the film, where you three start riffing on “Owner of a Lonely Heart”…

MURPHY: (laughs) Which became a sketch.

KP: Which became a sketch, but you can see the entire development process.

MURPHY: I may be bold, but I think you’ll find that we were never pissing at each other.

KP: No, which was consistent through all of it. The Joel segment recordings you can see you guys were building on each other in an improv fashion.

MURPHY: We really liked working with each other. I think we were better for it and I think that we were always able to jam something out and work well together.

KP: The Coiley stuff is in there, too…

MURPHY: (laughs)

KP: With you guys coming up with euphemisms for… well… for a trip to the bathroom…

MURPHY: Yes, indeed.

KP: And Mike stunning you both with “blowing mud.”

MURPHY: First time I’ve heard that. “Pushing a crayon” and “blowing mud,” I think, both came out of Mike.

KP: At which point you can hear this awed silence, but you can also hear this sort of quiet shift as you try to move away from him.

MURPHY: (laughs) Oh my.

KP: But you can see the camaraderie that’s carried through to RiffTrax. At what point did Mike approach you about doing a RiffTrax?

MURPHY: Almost immediately after he got it up and going, he said one of the reasons he was doing it was he wanted to be able to have his old pals come and join him for these things. And I offered my services right away. It’s just come up in various ways, several times. Mike, not long after the death knell sounded for Mystery Science Theater, was talking about issuing CDs which would go along with a movie, but the CD publishing industry is also pretty rugged. And MP3 comes along and suddenly everything gets a lot easier.

KP: It was a go-to question for the past 20 years when anybody would interview you, is first, “What was the worst movie you guys have done…”, and second, “Why don’t you do Star Trek V?”…

MURPHY: Yeah. And now that’s not a problem anymore. I think that’s one of the great, fun features of it, is that we can do anything. It’s a little odd for some people, because there’s not an actual product that you can hold in your hand. You’d have to be more than mildly technologically impaired not to be able to do RiffTrax. It’s pretty damn easy, and it works pretty damn well.

KP: Is there any film that’s untouchable for you?

MURPHY: There’s films that, out of discretion, we won’t do. The Passion of the Christ is not high on the list.

KP: Not so much content wise, but films that you hold dear enough that you would pass should it ever come up?

MURPHY: I’m sure there are. I haven’t thought of them because I just haven’t considered doing them – because one of the things we’re doing now is taking more current things and things we always wanted to do, first. And there are so many of them.

KP: So where’s Corky Romano?

MURPHY: See, here’s the problem with comedies. It’s difficult to make a comedy out of a comedy, especially when it’s a failed comedy.

KP: Which I believe is why you guys thought of Catalina Caper as one of the hardest ones you’ve ever done.

MURPHY: It was hard because it was supposed to be a comedy, and comedies are…it doesn’t make sense. There’s something about making a joke on a joke that just doesn’t work. Because bad jokes hurt. You can shoot a puppy and it doesn’t hurt as much as a bad joke.

KP: If you were to pick one of the films that you suffered through multiple times… would you say Serendipity would be an acceptable choice?

MURPHY: Definitely. I would tear that to pieces. As a comedy? I don’t know if it was a comedy. It was a romance. It was a chick film. We could have fun with that. It was just dumb.

KP: One thing about A Year At The Movies is that you watch them again and again and again…

MURPHY: Well, I saw Forrest Gump again. That may be the movie that I hate the most on the whole planet, ever.

KP: Just because of how manipulative it is?

MURPHY: Yeah. So cravenly manipulative. It’s a cowardly film in every way. It’s simply out there to milk tears out of the audience like a cow.

KP: So Forrest Gump is a prime candidate, is what you’re saying…

MURPHY: Oh yeah, I think so.

KP: In everything I’ve seen for Film Crew, it seems like the closest thing to being MST as you could get.

MURPHY: I guess it is, because it’s the three of us. There’s no puppets involved, that’s the difference.

KP: But there are framing sequences.

MURPHY: There are. Well, we wanted to have some sort of frame around it.

KP: And you’re playing, essentially, fictionalized versions of yourselves.

MURPHY: I guess you could say that, yes. I would never compare us to the Marx Brothers or the Three Stooges, but I think that’s probably the sort of thing that it’s generated from. It’s just a way for us to stage ourselves and say, “Here we are, here’s how we’re doing it, and here’s why.”

KP: What was the desire to go back and do a thing where you’re on camera?

MURPHY: I never had the desire to do something on camera. It was just we needed to have it. (laughs) When I look at my big, ugly, middle-aged gob on camera, I sort of cringe a little bit, so I have to act as loony as possible.

KP: So you’d be fine if it was covered with, say, a monkey mask…

MURPHY: Well, I’m always less self-conscious when properly masked or bepuppeted.

murphy2007-07-18-09.jpgKP: Everyone I talked to, who talked about the Bobo phase, talked about how uninhibited you were as a performer during that period, in that make-up…

MURPHY: (laughs) Even the Greeks knew they could always be a little bit freer behind the mask.

KP: So that’s an assessment that you wholly agree with?

MURPHY: Oh, absolutely.

KP: Seems like there was nothing that you wouldn’t do as Bobo.

MURPHY: Well, I’ve never actually flung my own crap, if that’s what you mean.

KP: At least not on camera.

MURPHY: Not even off camera.

KP: Mike said different.

MURPHY: No crap, no. I’m not saying that I didn’t fling other people’s crap, but we’ll leave it at that. The fun of the Film Crew is, I think – first of all, it’s a self-contained DVD. And I think people who like Mystery Science Theater for the choices of movies we made will like the Film Crew for that same reason. We combed the world and found the four most perfectly suited films… and let me tell you, it’s difficult to do it. The PD world is difficult to get through.

KP: How did you miss these films during the MST days?

MURPHY: Some of them I think we missed just because there were so many out there. I know we looked at the Peter Graves movie. I’m forgetting the name of it now. I’ll have to look it up on our website. Killers from Space. I know we looked at Killers from Space when we were doing Mystery Science Theater, and for some reason or another we couldn’t get it. So that’s one that we ended up doing. But The Wild Women of Wongo, I don’t think I’d ever seen before, and I sure as hell had not seen Hollywood After Dark. And that’s the one, boy, I don’t know why – it’s in its own way so much cheesy Hollywood. I mean, it actually captured something of cheesy Hollywood in a way it didn’t intend to.

KP: So, in some ways, it’s a very beautiful document of a bygone era.

MURPHY: (laughs) Well, in the way that I guess if you didn’t have your glasses on you could say that toilet paper is a beautiful document.

KP: It certainly is a moment in time, is what you’re saying.

MURPHY: Well, the Rue MacClanahan stripping thing, and the extended scenes of stripping in it, and they just go on…

KP: How does Rue compare to Nichelle Nichols?

MURPHY: (laughs) Nichelle looks graceful compared to Rue. And Rue has the body of a woman from the 50s. Sort of like a Dodge Dart.

KP: So she looks like your aunt getting changed.

MURPHY: Yeah, that’s the thing. Nichelle kind of looked like your grandma. She was too old for that, by the way. Poor woman, god bless her. Great legs – way too old for it. The thing I love about Hollywood After Dark is it had that lurid girlie magazine quality to it, in that you never actually see any of the naughty bits. Just there are pasties, for those who are looking forward to it. Yes, there are feathered pasties.

KP: You’re really building this up for me

MURPHY: I know! (laughs) It could be a big let down, but I don’t think so.

KP: How different is the writing process now that it’s obviously a much smaller group putting these together?

MURPHY: We used to sit and write as a group. And more recently we’ve been writing chunks of the movie separately.

KP: Obviously location plays a role.

MURPHY: That’s the main reason why it became out of necessity. But the thing about having written together for as long as we have – Bill, Mike and I – is that we kind of know each other’s beats and we can at least anticipate each other’s sort of perspective. I don’t try to write like Bill or Mike, nor do they try to write like me. But it ends up… I would dare people to figure out which part I wrote or which part Bill wrote or which part Mike wrote.

KP: If it has a fart joke, it was Bill.

MURPHY: I’m big on the fart jokes. They always accuse me of being the one who goes over the line. Mr. Blow Mud accuses me of going over the line.

KP: When I talked to Mike a few months back he mentioned if there’s anybody who needs to be pulled back, it’s you…

MURPHY: (laughs) Well, part of it is I do that because it seems to horrify Mike so much. There’s not a lot that can horrify Mike, but I can horrify Mike.

KP: Which is odd, considering he’s the king of scat.

MURPHY: (laughs) Well, poop is one thing, but when you start getting into, I guess, the sort of territory I tread in some times, it…

KP: He also mentioned he tends to avoid things of a political nature…

MURPHY: Yeah. He stays out of the political spectrum, and that’s just fine. I think I only go in there when it’s an obvious hand grenade I can drop into the room. Otherwise it’s not worth it, because nobody wants to hear my politics. I’m not a political comic. I can make fun of anybody on any side of the aisle. I can probably whip up a quick François Mitterrand joke if I needed to.

KP: That’s a challenge.

MURPHY: It is a challenge, and I’m not going to do it. I will, but send me a thousand dollars first.

KP: Now I’m torn. Do I want to hear you play with a puppet…

MURPHY: Or do a joke on François Mitterrand.

KP: There must be some thought of an MST reunion, approaching the anniversary…

MURPHY: Not in my mind.

KP: At all?

MURPHY: I don’t see how it would happen.

KP: Some convention, somewhere, must have tried to engineer it.

MURPHY: Not that I have heard, myself.

KP: If you were presented with someone saying, “We’d like to do an MST celebration and get all you guys together to do an event…”

MURPHY: I’d probably have to up my price to a million dollars.

KP: That’s a hell of a jump.

MURPHY: I’d always consider it – again, because of the people involved, whom I’ve had great fun working with over the years.

KP: But obviously, that is a looming specter with the anniversary coming up, that somebody’s going to try to do something, somewhere.

MURPHY: I would need to be invited. I certainly wouldn’t instigate.

KP: But you would not be adverse to that occurring.

MURPHY: Certainly not. I couldn’t stop it from occurring, and I wouldn’t have any reason to stop it from occurring. But this falls, for me, into the realm of nostalgia.

KP: And also the deadly realm of personal nostalgia.

MURPHY: Yeah, that’s the thing. You saw The Return to Gilligan’s Island. I mean, what the fuck? (laughs) It was horrible.

KP: Well, I can’t see you guys welcoming the Harlem Globetrotters…

MURPHY: Number one, we’re older….

KP: Yeah, but you were puppets…

MURPHY: That’s true. The puppets didn’t age. But it does. Nostalgia… even the word sounds like a disease. Suffice it to say, I would be surprised if it happened, let’s put it that way.

KP: But now it’s going to be in print.

MURPHY: I’ll have to eat my words.

KP: Are you still doing pieces for NPR?

MURPHY: I’m not. The three of us, when we first formed the Film Crew, we intended to do a radio show for NPR. We did the pilot, and we had great fun doing it, but it never made it to series. That sort of ended the… we were working on other things, and it seemed like the time for us to move away from each other there.

KP: So who controls the pilot?

MURPHY: Probably NPR, I would imagine. They own the thing. I don’t know. I have to talk to somebody about that.

KP: It might be a fun thing to throw up on the website.

MURPHY: Yeah, you never know. We actually had it for a while, or we had a segment on the Film Crew website, for a while.

KP: If they’re not doing anything with it, you might as well.

MURPHY: Yeah. I don’t know if it’s still up there.

KP: What would you say, then, is your primary focus at this point?

MURPHY: I’m also trying to get another book going, maybe two. Particularly with the subject matter, I’m having a devil of a time finding someone to rep the book, just because most of the agents I have met… the working title of the book is Why Hollywood Sucks.

KP: That’s not incendiary at all.

MURPHY: (laughs) No. It’s a bit of a petition. I have actually come up with 95 theses, in the tradition of Martin Luther, as to why Hollywood sucks, and when the book is sold and released, I plan on nailing a copy of it to the front door of the Chinese Theater.

KP: Could you name one or two of the theses that you are developing?

MURPHY: Oh, absolutely. The first one, not surprisingly, is Thomas Edison. Because I have to go through history. Thomas Edison is one of the large reasons why Hollywood sucks to this day, because he sort of set the trend for the crass, completely commercially driven product that we have today. And trying to milk as much out of the audience as possible, and give them as little as they absolutely need. I believe I discovered the first bad movie, too, which is Thomas Edison’s own electrocution of an elephant.

KP: I believe that was the precedent for the summer blockbuster.

MURPHY: Exactly. (laughs) You’ve got it.

KP: His animal snuff film, which I believe was meant as a swipe at Tesla.

MURPHY: Well, it was a swipe at Westinghouse, really.

KP: But was really an attempt to destroy Tesla’s theories on the safest means of delivering electical current…

MURPHY: As I read it, at that time he was really more pissed off at Westinghouse than he was Tesla, and he came to exact his personal vendetta and character assassination of Tesla along the line.

KP: Because it’s easier to attack a person than an entity, anyway.

MURPHY: Well, it’s kind of difficult when you’ve invested everything in a technology that’s not going to work.

KP: That’s quite deadly, actually.

MURPHY: That’s right.

KP: It’s a fascinating film on so many horrible levels.

MURPHY: Yes it is. And it’s a bad film.

KP: I’ll bet it’s on You Tube.

MURPHY: Of course it is.

KP: What is the resistance you’ve been hitting? What have they told you when you approached them with the book?

MURPHY: I get the same kind of cold reception I think anybody who’s baldly indicting the system that makes so many people so much money would fall upon. I think if I sold it to a small press I could probably get the thing going, but I also have to make a living at the same time, so I don’t know how interested I am in doing that. So, like a lot of books, it just may take some time to find the audience. The thing is I’m trying to keep it as current as possible, so I keep writing new chapters and updating old ones. It’s folly to point out M. Night Shyamalan as one of the reasons why Hollywood sucks now because everybody knows it and it’s no surprise.

KP: Right. So how complete is the book at this point?

MURPHY: I’ve actually written about 135 reasons, and I had to pare it down to 95. It’s pretty complete.

KP: So, other than revisions…

MURPHY: Revisions and updates is what I’d have to continue to do.

KP: But it’s pretty much ready to go.

MURPHY: It’s close. I did the cowardly thing and lumped some things together. Took five directors who you should not watch, and five actors who oughtn’t sing, and five singers who oughtn’t act…

KP: What’s one of the directors on your list?

MURPHY: Oh, let’s see, what would I have here… Pitof. You know Pitof?

KP: Oh yes.

MURPHY: And Mick G, of course. Dennis Dugan. This was a hard list to pare down.

KP: I really hope Brett Ratner’s on that list.

MURPHY: Brett is not. I chose Tom Shadyac, instead. The guy who did Patch Adams.

KP: In a fight, I’d have to go with Ratner. Just as far as pure, unadulterated crassness of filmmaking.

MURPHY: Well, Michael Bay still breaks the mold, as far as I’m concerned. Have you visited his website, “Shoot for the Edit”?

KP: Oh yes. And his musings on the audience are always…

MURPHY: (laughs)

KP: … fascinating.

MURPHY: Yeah.

KP: I’d still vote for Ratner, though.

MURPHY: And there are some easy targets that I threw out, like Uwe Boll. That’s just…

KP: Yeah, but what other filmmaker would challenge his critics to a fistfight?

MURPHY: That’s true. I think he did that out of desperation, because he lost his moneymaking machine. The German public funding moneymaking machine went away.

KP: That made it so he could crank out dozens of films a year.

MURPHY: Yeah. But since that loophole went away, he doesn’t have the investors he used to have. That’s one of the problems. Breasts is one of the reasons I have, too. It’s reason #34 right now.

KP: Yes, but what point are you dating the creation of breasts to?

MURPHY: I don’t think that breasts are a bad thing, but they’re a reason why Hollywood sucks.

KP: As far as the cinematic treatment of breasts?

MURPHY: Well, I invite you to imagine a world without breast obsession. Think about what the culture would be like if we looked at women’s bodies differently than we do right now. Jessica Simpson would have to get a job. Meryl Streep could probably get $50 million a picture.

KP: You saw the reality shows. We don’t want people like Paris Hilton in the workplace.

MURPHY: Oh, God is one of the reasons, of course, why Hollywood sucks.

KP: Go on, I’ve gotta hear this…

MURPHY: Well, because Hollywood’s scared to death of God. Hollywood doesn’t know how to treat God. It sort of goes hand-in-hand with sex, which sounds like an odd combination, but Hollywood’s also scared to death of sex. They don’t mind lurid things, but they really can’t deal directly with sex. And God, it’s almost impossible for Hollywood to do any sort of movie that directly reflects divine experience. What do we get? The Passion of the Christ, which… you know, you can take it for what it is. The DaVinci Code – is this as close as we get to God? Or Constantine? Those are odd examples. God reflected in an action film doesn’t work for me. For me, the best film about God – probably in the last 10 or 12 years – is probably Dogma. It does have action sequences, too, a couple of juicy ones.

KP: So you’re a fan of Dogma…

MURPHY: Oh, I love Dogma. It’s my favorite Kevin Smith film.

KP: I’ll have to tell Kevin.

MURPHY: Oh, that’s right, this is on View Askew, right?

KP: Yes, this is his entertainment site…

MURPHY: I’m not just pimpin’ here. That and Jay’s depiction of Jamie Gumm in the last Clerks movie. That’s wonderful. That’s the best two scenes in the movie.

KP: I’m sure Kevin will be happy to hear that. I don’t know how he’s going to feel about the Daredevil RiffTrax…

MURPHY: (laughs) Oh, it’s all in good fun, for crying out loud. Good natured ribbing.

KP: Oh, of course it is…

MURPHY: Every once in a while you’ve got to throw a snowball.

KP: I think Jersey Girl still hurts. That was a film that was close to his heart.

MURPHY: I’m sure it was. You could tell it was heartfelt.

KP: I admit, I did like your riff on Daredevil. That was one of my favorite RiffTrax.

MURPHY: Actually, we performed that live in San Francisco.

KP: Oh, that was part of the Sketch Fest performance…

MURPHY: Yes it was.

KP: So, how do you feel about performing live like that?

MURPHY: It’s a blast.

KP: You did it what, three times in the past, with MST?

MURPHY: Yeah.

KP: What is the setup when you guys are performing live doing the RiffTrax? Are you still facing the screen?

MURPHY: We’ve done it in two venues in two different ways. We’ve done it at the Rafael Film Center, in San Rafael. They’ve got a gorgeous theater out there. We sit looking at a monitor with the screen to our backs and with our faces to the audience. And that was fun to do. The house is dark so we don’t really see the audience, so it’s just like any sort of stage show. When we went to Cobb’s, which is also part of the sketch fest… they do a lot… almost like one of the regular houses for the sketch fest. We were sort of facing the screen. The screen was off to one side of the stage and we were on the other, so sort of facing the audience, but enough so we could see the screen. And we have music stands and our little lights there, so we looked like we’re the three cellists in a chamber ensemble. And we’d perform the film. We’d have a little give and take, a little improvisation. We have to listen to the audience. We have to drop a few things sometimes when the audience is laughing too hard, which is a good thing, when the audience is laughing too hard. But different nights, different performances, different things strike the audience as funny. And that part, you have to be a lot more on your toes than when you’re doing it in a recording studio. But it’s great fun.

KP: Do you feel more comfortable doing it now than you did the first time you did it?

MURPHY: Oh god, the first time, we thought the audience might turn on us, that they all might start throwing comments at the screen, and we’d lose control. But what we learned is – like anybody who’s done standup – if you don’t take control, then you lose control. We performed our material and had fun, and just made the audience have fun.

KP: Was there any point where things might have gotten a bit dicey or someone was in the theater who just thought it was all participatory and, “I’m just going to add a little something…”

MURPHY: Never. From the time we got going… the first time we did Mystery Science Theater live we did a movie called World Without End. Which I always wanted to be a Mystery Science Theater movie, but it never worked out. The first joke, there’s a big nuclear explosion. You see the mushroom cloud. And Crow says, “Ah, Dan Quayle’s first day as president.” And that’s all it took, and then the audience was with us the rest of the time and it was a love fest.

KP: That’s a clip that’s on the Scrapbook tape, I believe.

MURPHY: Ah…

KP: I believe it’s now discontinued, since you guys never got any rights to put all that stuff out.

MURPHY: Probably not.

KP: Does the footage still exist for the sequences cut from This Island Earth, from the MST motion picture?

MURPHY: I’m sure it does. I don’t know if that’s on any of the outtakes.

KP: Because you guys did the entire film, didn’t you? You wrote for the entirety of This Island Earth…

MURPHY: You mean did we write the entire script?

KP: Meaning the film, as it runs, was cut by what, about 30 minutes?

MURPHY: Oh yeah, it was chopped to hell. Actually, we did a trimmed version when we first started, because we knew that there were a few things that… in order to keep the thing to feature length, we wanted to chop it down – but then the studio insisted as we went along that we keep chopping and chopping and chopping, until it became shorter than a regular episode of Mystery Science Theater, which I thought was stupid.

KP: So, then, obviously if someone at the studio wanted to do a special edition, theoretically they could do an extended version… That footage still exists…

MURPHY: Theoretically they could, but I think if they wanted to they might have done it already.

KP: I don’t know. Have you seen how much that DVD goes for?

MURPHY: No.

KP: Two or three hundred dollars on eBay, for that original DVD release.

MURPHY: God almighty. I had one for a while. I think I gave it to Jeff Stonehouse, our photographer, because he didn’t have one.

KP: And he put it up on eBay!

MURPHY: (laughs) No, he’s very proud of the work he did, and I’m very proud of the work he did on that. That’s one of the things we gained along the way, was an incredible set of production people – craft people like Jeff and Brad Keeley, our editor… Tom Naunas, a sound man and musician who helped us out along the way all the time… and our staff photographer, Mickey Keinitz. These were really, really talented guys and they just loved to hang out with us, so we were really quite fortunate to have them around.

KP: The film is still spectacular…

MURPHY: Yeah, it’s pretty, isn’t it?

KP: It’s across the board a very nice looking film.

MURPHY: Yeah, thanks.

KP: You’re not the first to praise Jeff.

MURPHY: In his own way, he elevated us at the same time and made us look better. Everybody talked about bringing Mystery Science Theater to quote-unquote “the next level” from our sort of very cheesy beginnings, but he did it in a way, visually, that was very subtle, and that we didn’t ever get too polished. It always still had the handmade quality, and almost all the effects we’d do were in the camera. He’d use all the different photographic tricks, and we’d very rarely do anything in post, except for green screen effects every now and again. Still, when we’d shoot a spaceship, we’d bring out the old star background – a cloth with little flecks of foil on it. And we had a star wall, too.

KP: Just what was accomplished through the years with just that single camera is impressive…

MURPHY: (laughs) It’s true!

KP: It certainly gives a definition to the word innovation.

MURPHY: Yeah. He brought a jib. We always wanted to be able to do some sort of fluid moving crane-like camera shots, and he had this jib that sat on a tripod, and it was just revelatory.

KP: Was that ever proposed? How adamant was Joel about not having things like that early on?

MURPHY: I think we just sort of broadened it and grew up, because it started out there was a rigid set of rules that were sort of the rules of the show, and that was just fine because it was fun to operate within those limitations. And Cambot was actually supposed to be running the camera, and that was Cambot, and Cambot couldn’t move very much. The single camera thing was a very strong intention, and we kept pretty faithful to that. We’d play with our own conventions. After a while we found it enjoyable to break our own rules, and I think that’s just sort of our deviant nature.

KP: Right. But it was never something where there were arguments about it or…

MURPHY: I don’t think so.

KP: Because you were behind the camera during the first season.

MURPHY: Yeah. That’s one of the reasons why I’m happy the camera didn’t have to move.

KP: You mean it’s somewhat easy to get that director credit?

MURPHY: Oh yeah.

KP: You were the main director throughout the years. What was it like directing them as actors?

MURPHY: Very little was needed. Just maybe sometimes some suggestions on tone, but I think we were all… as we took turns being directors, were pretty open minded about what would happen. And a lot of it was worked out before we even got into rehearsal by reading through the scripts and understanding what they meant. One would immediately know what the character was supposed to do and how they were supposed to do it. And since it was a series, occasionally we’d have to, when we had a guest character or something, I’d sort of have to direct somebody into what I thought that should be. We’d have earnest discussions, but I don’t think there was ever a fight on set that I can remember. Nobody ever walked off.

KP: Budget or time-wise, was there ever a drop dead point as far as takes?

MURPHY: Oh absolutely. Well, just fatigue wise. We had to finish it in the time allotted. I think there might have been one time when we actually had to… maybe one time, over the whole course of the thing, where we actually had to have an extra day to do something. It was not that difficult, because we were always in the same set – you know, the same two or three sets. When it became difficult is when we’d write too much for ourselves and put in an incredibly complicated special effects scene that took forever. Every time you’d blow somebody up and they’d disappear, you know? (laughs) That kind of thing took more time than we wanted it to, but you put it down in the writing room, and it’s easy to do when you’re writing it – and then suddenly you realize, “Oh, we gotta direct this shit.”

KP: So would you say the Sci-Fi years were more challenging?

MURPHY: They all had their challenges. I think it was – and I’ll never blame anybody at Sci-Fi for this – it was the creepy people who we had at USA Network, who were sort of the overlords… because Sci-Fi at that time was really not… it was getting its legs. Right now, the thing is a monster. It’s just incredibly successful and it’s got a huge audience. And the folks I worked with at Sci-Fi, some of whom are still there, Tom Vitali in particular, were terrific advocates of our show. As a matter of fact, I think they’re one of the reasons why the show went on longer than it did. I think the folks at USA were ready to cut it after the first season, but Tom kept on going to bat for the show. So we had these overlords at USA who said, “The season has to have an arc. You have to have a story arc.” That’s why suddenly we had to have all these fucking set changes and traveling all over the universe, is that they wanted a seasonal arc for a show that they never ran in sequence. Now tell me that isn’t stupid.

KP: Well, it was USA…

MURPHY: Well, yeah! What was their other big thing at the time? Wrestling. That should tell you everything. The only prestige piece they had at the time, which I loved, was tennis. They had the US open.

KP: You can’t get more of an arc than wrestling.

MURPHY: (laughs) Well, at least they show wrestling in sequence.

KP: I’m surprised they didn’t say, “If you could just get one of our wrestlers in there…”

MURPHY: I’m really glad they didn’t call for that, but it was the one time I even hung up on a network executive, was when they told me to shoot something that I simply refused to do.

KP: Which was…?

MURPHY: Honestly, I don’t remember exactly what it was that I was supposed to do, but it was so stupid. We had an executive, and she was assigned to us, and her job apparently was to piss into the tea and tell us that it tastes like lemon. And do her best to drive the show into the ground before it actually got started at Sci-Fi. She had a toady, this little guy named *****. And I imagine that ***** had bad skin and was sort of paunchy. I don’t think I ever met him, because if I did I would have kicked him in the nuts. ***** was the guy who had to call us up, and *****, at first, had these delusions of grandeur that he could tell us what to do. So one time I said to *****, “Get your mother on the phone.” And he didn’t like that. Then he went and told her essentially that I had made fun of him, and she called me back and said, “Don’t make fun of *****.” Things like that. It was unpleasant. The folks at Sci-Fi – wonderful people. Salt of the earth. Loved the show. The folks at USA – they really just dropped their pants and emptied their bowels on us as much as possible.

KP: Did it make the Comedy Central years seem golden?

MURPHY: It’s a business, and it’s a big business, and it’s a big business run by these companies that are owned by companies that are owned by companies. So you’re always going to run into assholes, because there’s just assholes all over the place in that business. So I don’t blame USA, I blame these particular individuals. And I don’t name them because that wouldn’t be nice.

KP: Except for poor *****.

MURPHY: Well, I didn’t say his last name, and I won’t.

KP: Yeah, but someone who works with him will look at this and go, that’s *****. He is a toady.

MURPHY: He was a toady. And I think he probably knows that he was a toady at the time. We had a wonderful guy – who again, went to bat for us at Comedy Central… John Newton, who ran the network for a while, and he just loved us and we loved him. He did everything he could for us, and so in return we’d do everything we could for them. When it came to the stuff with USA, we didn’t want to do things for them because they were unpleasant. And so we did and we got as creative as we could with that, and that’s why we ended up with Rome and the camping planet and the odd little children, and we had and the ape planet and all of those things. Which were fun, but god it was a lot of work.

KP: Which of the children was based on *****?

MURPHY: (laughs) We never did a character based on *****, which was probably wise. We did do characters based on our execs at Universal when we did the movie. There’s one episode where Pearl and Clayton are the execs in charge of Earth Versus Soup.

KP: Oh, is this the focus group?

MURPHY: Yes. And you’ll see in that, that Trace keeps drinking larger and larger bottles of water, because we’d have this one guy who’d come into screenings with like two three liter bottles of water. And every time we’d see him it seemed like the bottle was getting larger. So by the end Trace is drinking out of one of those 10 gallon jugs that you put in the water cooler.

KP: What was the most ludicrous note that you remember having to deal with on the movie?

MURPHY: Oh, I wish I had kept those things, because there were so many. I think we ended up writing things just so we’d see if we’d get a note on them. That’s one thing I do wish I’d kept, because they were so damn funny. I remember we made the comment that… this was back in the Joel days. We almost never got notes from Comedy Central. We got tons of notes from USA. It was something about we had said Joel was hammered off his scrawny ass. It said, “He’s not really going to be hammered off his scrawny ass, is he?” “No, he’s not really going to be hammered off his scrawny ass.”

KP: How many notes did you get from – what was it, Gramercy that you were dealing with?

MURPHY: Oh god, pages and pages and pages from those people.

KP: Was it mainly to “tone this down,” “who’s Kurt Vonnegut”…

MURPHY: The one that killed me… the one that said to me, “That’s it, whatever happens is fine, I’ve done all I can here, I’m just going to do it and get it done…” At the very end where the monster we called Scrotor appears, with the big lobes and the eyes and the shimmery suit, Crow was supposed to yell out, “It’s Bootsy Collins.” It was perfect for the moment, and it would have busted the house down. And they said, “We don’t know who Bootsy Collins is, so you can’t use the joke.” And I said, “How white do you have to be not to know who Bootsy Collins is?” One was from Canada and the other was from, like, Van Nuys, I think.

KP: Just the self-importance of, “We don’t know the reference, so cut it…”

MURPHY: Yeah, “We don’t know, so I can’t be funny.” And so we had to change it. Small things are sometimes the hardest to accept, and that was one of those small things.

KP: How different was the initial draft of the script?

MURPHY: Oh god, when we first put the movie out there, when we pitched it to Universal, it was sort of an all-singing, all-dancing Mystery Science Theater. We had musical numbers, we had a fantasy scene in which Crow imagines himself to be Steve McQueen in The Great Escape, and he’s trying to rescue Kim Cattrall, who’s sitting on the other side of the barbed wire in a Heidi costume beckoning him. And we were actually going to shoot, shot for shot, the last parts of the chase scene with Steve McQueen, only with Crow on the motorcycle. It would have been sublime. We had a musical number for Gypsy, we had one for Tom. Here’s an irony – the one scene hat we wrote in the first draft that actually made it to film was this scene in which there’s a meteor shower that hits the ship and imperils everybody. And it’s the one scene that they cut from the movie. (laughs) You see, everybody who’s made a movie with a big studio has stories like this. It’s nothing new.

KP: But largely these stories are untold. Maybe that’s a special RiffTrax you can do, for MST: The Movie.

MURPHY: (laughs) I’ve mentioned these things before, and that’s why I’m being candid about them, is that I’ve mentioned them at conventions and things like that.

KP: But to document it, get the guys together, through RiffTrax, but for MST: The Movie, since Universal will never let you do it with any candor.

MURPHY: (laughs)

KP: You did This Island Earth when you were trying to sell the film during the first MST convention, didn’t you?

MURPHY: It was the second convention.

KP: I thought you did a live…

MURPHY: At the first one we did World Without End.

KP: Was that the original script that you used when you did the live This Island Earth?

MURPHY: When we did the live This Island Earth, that’s the script we started with in order to make the movie. And that’s the script that they immediately launched into. And that’s the script that brought the house down, which they never seemed to remember.

KP: Even though they were there.

MURPHY: I don’t know if the execs were there. Our agent was there, and one of the guys who bought the movie. But we were assigned these two people. Sort of like being assigned a locker. You just had to have them. They were there to come along and fuck up your film as much as they possibly could. Oh, this is lovely – and I have talked about this before – one of these guys had worked on Billy Madison. Does that tell you something? So we had the idea of the puppets talking over the credits. Mike and the bots talking over the credits, which seemed like a fun thing to do and an easy way to do the credits. He said, “I don’t think that’s going to scan with our audience. What you ought to think about doing is having a shot of each one of the characters and then freezing and having something underneath that tells what happened to them.”

KP: Did they just watch Animal House?

MURPHY: Well, American Graffiti. That’s what we always called the “Killed in Vietnam” thing. This is what I love – we said, “No, we don’t want to do that, we want to do the thing with the credits.” So they chewed on that for a couple of days and called me late at night one night and said to me, “Well, we talked this over with Casey Silver, who’s the head of production, and he said no, the talking over the credits isn’t going to work. You’re going to have to go with the died in Vietnam thing, the Billy Madison style credits.” And so I called our agent out of frustration and our agent called Casey Silver. And Casey Silver said, “What the fuck are you talking about?” So I caught these two execs in a lie. And after that, they treated us a lot lighter than they had before, which was nice.

KP: Because they knew there were checks & balances beyond just their personal playground?

MURPHY: Well, the one thing I think you don’t want to do if you’re a production exec is get caught lying about your boss. It’s a bad idea.

KP: I hope one day to see more of that footage. Tell Mike, RiffTrax, so you all can vent. Now, did Frank do any writing at all on the film?

MURPHY: On Mystery Science Theater?

KP: Yeah, on the motion picture.

MURPHY: I really don’t believe Frank wrote on the movie beyond the script for the live performance of This Island Earth.

KP: So he was there for the writing process, at least, on that.

MURPHY: Yeah.

KP: When did the decision come down that he wouldn’t be part of the on-camera stuff? Was that his decision?

MURPHY: No, Frank wanted to be out there. He wanted to be on the coast and he wanted to be working in TV out there. He’d always wanted to, and he had a lot of friends who were doing it, so it was just time. And no, he wasn’t part of the scripting of… he was part of the scripting of the live show, so his stamp was on the movie, This Island Earth, when we took that script and made it into the movie script. But no, it was really amicable, and I was sad to see him go. He was ready to move on, and so he did.

KP: He’s made quite a career for himself.

MURPHY: I love the guy. Whenever I see him, it’s always fun to see him.

murphy2007-07-18-10.jpg
Photo by Julian Weiss

KP: Have you ever entertained the idea of moving west?

MURPHY: Not seriously.

KP: I remember having this conversation six years ago with Mike, and Mike said, “Oh, I’ll never move out to the West Coast.”

MURPHY: Well, San Diego is a far, far cry from Los Angeles. It’s more than 100 miles away.

KP: And worlds away.

MURPHY: It’s ten million miles away. Everyone I know who gets stuck in Los Angeles tries to rationalize how much they like it. And they almost all bring up the Farmer’s Market. What the hell is that? “Oh, you gotta come down and have breakfast at the Farmer’s Market.” I’ve had breakfast at the Farmer’s Market. It’s like a county fair without the rides.

KP: Yeah, and you get to watch people lining up for Price is Right.

MURPHY: (laughs) So I don’t know what the big thrill is. It’s a company town. If you want to make breakthroughs in the automobile industry, do you move to Detroit?

KP: Even the ones who go out there… even Trace bought a place back in Minnesota again.

MURPHY: Yeah. It’s just a much more human environment. I don’t know how to say it. Los Angeles is a very difficult place to live unless you have a lot of money. And even then it can be a difficult place to live. You can set yourself up in a comfortable situation, and I know many people have, but I don’t know a lot of people who are truly happy living out there and having to do that commute, and they’d rather live someplace else. And when they’re done with whatever they’re doing out there, they move elsewhere. I know two or three people who love it there and would never move anyplace else. And actually two of those people aren’t even in the entertainment industry. If you’re an accountant, it’s a great place to live, let me tell ya. There’s this town that they profiled on All Things Considered yesterday, in China, which is one of the most polluted towns in the known world. I think I might take that over Los Angeles. Chernobyl actually has charm and appeal that Los Angeles lacks.

KP: It’s far less radioactive.

MURPHY: Bangladesh during the monsoon season.

KP: And the people are nicer.

MURPHY: They are. More real.

KP: How much traveling would you say you do at this point?

MURPHY: I do a lot less than I’d like to, but I do enough. I get out of the country. It’s a wonderful way to keep your perspective on the world. I do that whenever I can, which is not often enough.

KP: Are you the type of traveler that goes out and sightsees, or just relaxes? What is recreational travel for you?

MURPHY: Well, it depends. I like it both ways. Sometimes I like to go someplace and simply relax, sometimes I like to go someplace and immerse myself in the culture.

KP: Are you the type of person who doesn’t bring a camera?

MURPHY: Jane, my spouse, is a brilliant photographer, so I don’t have to bring a camera. It’s very freeing and liberating.

KP: But as far as you personally, could you ever envision yourself carrying a camera when you go on these vacations?

MURPHY: Sometimes when I travel alone, I bring a camera just to send pictures back home. Jane actually takes pictures – I take snapshots. There’s a world of different between them.

KP: I’m assuming you often partake of the local culture.

MURPHY: Especially music and food.

KP: Do you tend to avoid doing something that you could just as easily do at home?

MURPHY: Oh yeah. The only thing that interests me is how different we are from each other. I’m planning on going to Italy again this fall, but I think we’re going to take a train into Slovenia.

KP: What sort of planning is needed for that?

MURPHY: Two things that attract me is that they have drinkable water and I know nothing about it.

KP: I noticed which one you put first.

MURPHY: (laughs) Well, it’s not going to be a long trip. If we’re going to do something like India, you really have to plan for like a month. Or Africa. I’d love to go to Africa with Jane, because she’s been there before. But you have to plan at least a month so you can let the dysentery course through you, or maybe let the first wave of malaria get over you and then you can…

KP: So you can fly back fine, is what you’re saying.

MURPHY: Right. And alive.

KP: That’s always a plus, to know you’re going to come back alive. Is there any place that’s on your “always wanted to, but nothing ever aligns to get there” list of locations?

MURPHY: Well, when I was writing the book, there were two places that killed me I couldn’t go. One was Hong Kong, and the other was Mumbai, which are two of the world’s largest centers for film. And actually, the third was Rio De Janeiro. Three of the largest centers for film production in the world. Besides the little houses and very large cities, there are very few places to see these movies. And thousands of films out of these places that you never get to see.

KP: What prevented Hong Kong?

MURPHY: Time and money is what it came down to. I wanted to do Hong Kong on the way back from Australia, and I probably could have added it onto my ticket, but that of course is when 9/11 happened, and I wanted to get home. So it was just not to be.

KP: So it was largely circumstantial.

MURPHY: Yeah. But India, it just… again, there were only so many places I could go and so much time to do it, and I had already filled my hit list with more than I could possibly do.

KP: Could you envision doing something as jam packed as that again? That project wore you down in many different ways…

MURPHY: Oh god, yeah, but I’m richer for the experience. Always. As long as I’m upright and regular, I’ll be happy to do something like that.

KP: And no kidney stones since?

MURPHY: And no kidney stones, yeah.

KP: I wince just thinking about that chapter. And what was the other… you mentioned two book ideas…

MURPHY: Well, I’ve been sort of writing a novel on and off for a long time here. It’s the story of an American family, a dynasty that starts during the pilgrim years, and it comes all the way up to the present day. Actually, we had, at one time…

KP: Sort of a Michener type of novel?

MURPHY: Well, except they’re really unpleasant people. They’re cowardly and they’re crass and they represent all the things we don’t like about Americans.

KP: So the not terribly magnificent Ambersons…

MURPHY: Exactly. The reprehensible Ambersons. And the family structure stays pretty much the same throughout history. So it’s almost like the same cast of characters moving through history. And I was probably inspired by Black Adder to do something. I said, “Well, there should be an American family that’s just as despicable in their own way.” Delightfully despicable.

KP: Unrepentantly loathsome.

MURPHY: Yes.

KP: See, this is why you’re watching The Fountain…

MURPHY: (laughs) Yeah, just that shaved head Hugh Jackman has, has really got me intrigued now.

KP: Just wait. You don’t even know what you’re in store for. And since you’re one of the people who can answer this, what exactly is Jim up to now?

MURPHY: I’m not one of the people who can answer this. I sort of lost touch with Jim.

KP: Really?

MURPHY: Yeah.

KP: Has anyone kept in touch with Jim?

MURPHY: Recently? Well, functionally speaking, I think people have, but I don’t socialize with them, and I haven’t for a while there, and that’s just… our lives are different. He’s got a different family than I do, and Jane and I have been traveling a lot, and the last I heard is that he’s involved with Second Life. And that’s all I know about it. They said he was doing a lot of time on Second Life.

KP: Were there any issues that arose over you all doing Film Crew?

MURPHY: Well, you know, it’s different enough so that it doesn’t really compete with Mystery Science Theater, but part of the fact is we started out… Rhino was actually going to distribute it, but the powers that be at Rhino didn’t think it would be as complimentary as we did. But Shout Factory is very happy to do it, and I think in the long run, if Film Crew does anything, it’s going to re-pique some people’s interest in Mystery Science Theater again, and vice versa. So I think the two are actually going to be mutually beneficial as we go ahead in the future. So I don’t think there’s an issue there.

KP: There’s certainly no shortage of episodes that Rhino still hasn’t released.

MURPHY: Oh yeah. They’ll keep that franchise going for… now there’s a franchise. It’s a series, it’s supposed to be a franchise. A television series.

KP: When was the last time you actually saw an episode?

MURPHY: Of Mystery Science Theater?

KP: Yeah…

MURPHY: A whole episode?

KP: A whole episode.

MURPHY: That’s a really good question. I have no idea. It’s been a few years, I’d say.

KP: And it was because you ran across it, or you were at an event where it was shown, where you had to see it?

MURPHY: No, I’m trying to think of the context. I actually watched it here at home. There was something I was looking for in a particular episode and I ended up watching the whole thing.

KP: Do you remember what your thoughts were while watching it?

MURPHY: Oh, how much fun it was to make. It’s like Jiffy Pop – it’s as much fun to make as it is to eat. It’s the magic treat.

KP: So nothing but good memories about it.

MURPHY: I believe in releasing bad karma and embracing good karma, so I don’t have any bad memories at all. I’m not even thinking of that as brainwashing – it’s just what you choose to hold onto and what you choose to let go.

KP: Is there any residual interest? Were you ever made a partner in Best Brains?

MURPHY: I’ve got a very small stake in there, so I occasionally get a check, and that’s a very nice thing.

KP: So there is something of a legacy beyond it.

MURPHY: Yeah.

KP: So would you say, at this point in time, you’re doing exactly what you want to be doing?

MURPHY: Do you know anybody who is? (laughs) I’m never doing exactly what I want to be doing, but what I’m doing is certainly enough. Life plans, you see, that’s like gazing into the future. Again, it’s like being nostalgic.

KP: We can’t go either way with you!

MURPHY: No, I live for the moment, my man.

KP: So are you enjoying the moment?

MURPHY: I’m enjoying the moment.

KP: Well, I hope that you finish the novel.

MURPHY: Well, thank you.

KP: I desperately want to read it, and I want to know the other directors on that list…

MURPHY: One way or the other.

KP: Well, hopefully this will put the bug in somebody’s ear when they read this, that they should pick it up.

MURPHY: You never know…

##

DVD Late Show: Pleasant Surprises

Filed under: DVD Late Show — UncaScroogeMcD @ 4:59 am

dvdlateshow.jpg

7/18/07

Welcome back to the Late Show. This time around, we’ve got looks at a lot of cult TV shows, both old and new, plus a bunch of B-movie reviews and another handful of capsule reviews as I work steadily to reduce the tottering stack of DVDs on my desk to a safer height. After all, if those things fell over on me now, it might be weeks before they could extricate my corpse.

You know what’s great about this gig? It’s picking up something I’m sent to review and looking at the box art and thinking that it looks like crap or just isn’t my “thing,” but upon viewing finding that I really enjoyed it. It doesn’t happen as often as I’d like, but I’ve had a few good experiences along that line in the last few weeks.

devilsden.jpg

The first of these was the Starz Media (formerly Anchor Bay) direct-to-DVD horror flick DEVIL’S DEN (2006). From the uninspired packaging and rote synopsis on the back, this looked like just another SciFi Channel hack job, with a derivative premise and some familiar faces in the cast just to make it saleable.

Well, I was half-right. The plot definitely is derivative, borrowing heavily from Richard Wenk’s 1986 favorite VAMP and Robert Rodriguez/Quentin Tarantino’s FROM DUSK “˜TIL DAWN. And there’s some familiar faces filling out the cast.

Witness: two young slacker types are on their way back from Mexico with a suitcase of alleged “Spanish Fly.” They stop at an isolated tittie bar to try out the product, and discover that the strippers are all monsters when one of the guys is killed. The remaining slacker (Devon Sawa, IDLE HANDS) then teams up with a gun-toting hottie (Kelly Hu, X2) and a samurai sword-slinging monster hunter (Ken Foree, DAWN OF THE DEAD, FROM BEYOND) to battle the bodacious but bloodthirsty bitches.

Seen it before. But”¦

Here’s where I was wrong. It’s no hack job. Director Andrew Dunt and writer Mitch Gould weren’t content to just go through the paces. No, they chose to add some style, some wit, some depth of character to their chosen flick formula and shake up the recipe a bit. It’s still an oatmeal cookie, but it’s a really tasty oatmeal cookie.

Everyone in the main cast does an outstanding job. Sawa’s character starts out as a complete asshole, and slowly transforms into”¦ well, still an asshole, but a likable one. Ken Foree’s still busting monster skulls”¦ but he’s getting’ older, and his character is, too. Kelly Hu is not only gorgeous, but she handles the action scenes with sublime grace and convincing athleticism. Not only that, but she manages to give her comic book character a lot of depth and sympathy.

In fact, everyone involved in this seems to have put in just a little extra effort. Certainly more than they needed to on a film like this. The direction is taut and tense, the writing is witty and wry, the cinematography is excellent and the stuntwork top-notch. The monster make-ups and gore effects are completely professional and state of the art and deliver the requisite grue.

Starz presents DEVIL’S DEN in a rock-solid 1.78:1 anamorphic widescreen ratio, with Dolby Digital 5.1 surround sound. There’s a fun and informative behind-the-scenes documentary, an interesting and engaging audio commentary track, an amusing blooper reel, and a photo gallery. There’s also the film’s screenplay on DVD-ROM, and trailers for additional Starz/Anchor Bay horror titles.

DEVIL’S DEN isn’t a classic. But there’s a lot of talent on display and it’s a lot of fun. Check it out, and see if you don’t agree.

eureka01.jpg

Another pleasant surprise was EUREKA ““ THE COMPLETE FIRST SEASON (2006) from Universal Home Video.

I’d seen the promos, but I had no real interest in this SciFi Channel Original series. I knew nothing about it except that it was about a secret town of scientific geniuses”¦ and that didn’t intrigue me in the least. But I was sent the first Season of twelve episodes, and figured I’d at least check out the Pilot. Well, my wife watched it with me, and we were soon hooked.

U.S. Marshall Jack Carter (Colin Ferguson) and his delinquent teenage daughter inadvertently stumble upon the northwestern community of Eureka after a car accident. While waiting for their car to be repaired, Carter finds himself helping the local authorities deal with a series of strange events, which are soon revealed to be a scientific experiment gone awry. Carter then learns that Eureka is the home of the world’s top minds, all working under the protection of the U.S. government to push the limits of technological advancement. Proving his worth to the authorities through solid detective work, he is promptly reassigned to be the town’s new sheriff.

A great ensemble cast and a light touch gives this NORTHERN EXPOSURE/X-FILES hybrid a broad appeal, with an eccentric but likeable bunch of townspeople (including MAX HEADROOM’s Matt Frewer, T2’s Joe Morton and Debrah Farentino of EARTH 2), a few dark mysteries and conspiracies, and a smart, sharp sense of humor.

Universal’s 3-disc set is packed into an eco-friendly recycled package and contains all 12 episodes from the first season in crystal sharp 1.78:1 anamorphic widescreen transfers. The disc includes over 10 hours of bonus features, most of which are commentaries and/or podcasts. There are some deleted scenes, and a couple of funny mock infomercials for “Made in Eureka” products.

EUREKA is a clever mix of sci-fi, drama and comedy, and I’m eagerly looking forward to season 2 on DVD (I guess it’s currently airing on SciFi).

thecondor.jpg

And, also in the category of “better than I expected,” comes the animated movie STAN LEE PRESENTS: THE CONDOR (2006), written by comics vet Marv Wolfman and directed by Steven Gordon, based on a concept by Stan “The Man” Lee.

This animated film tells the origin story of a young Latino superhero called The Condor, alias Tony Valdez (Wilmer Valderrama, THAT 70’S SHOW). After his scientist parents are murdered by their evil business partner and his legs crippled, Tony uses their experimental cybernetic technology and becomes a superhero with a high-tech skateboard.

Not a lot of originality in the story, but the animation by Film Roman (the studio behind the same company’s HELLBOY ANIMATED features) is solid TV fare, while the script by comics pro Wolfman deftly fleshes out the characters and sets things up with some style. Voice work is competent, and the overall result is a pleasant ““ if predictable ““ superhero adventure.

Starz Home Entertainment gives THE CONDOR a rock-solid 1.78:1 anamorphic widescreen presentation, with a robust Dolby 5.1 Surround sound track. Both English and Spanish 2.0 tracks are also provided. Extras include a corny on-screen intro by Lee, a behind-the-scenes featurette, a couple of art galleries and a DVD game.

A decent superhero cartoon with an appealing hero, THE CONDOR is worth a rental for comic book animation fans.

astromonster.jpg

Perhaps not the best entry in the long-running Godzilla series from Japan’s Toho Studios, INVASION OF ASTRO-MONSTER (GODZILLA Vs. MONSTER ZERO, KAIJÛ DAISENSO, 1965) is, nonetheless, my personal favorite.

In this kaiju classic, two astronauts ““ American Glenn (Nick Adams, DIE MONSTER DIE) and Fuji (Akira Takarada) are sent to investigate a newly discovered planet near Jupiter. Upon their arrival, they discover that the natives are under constant siege by the space monster, Ghidorah. But the aliens of Planet X have a plan: they’d like to “borrow” Godzilla and Rodan from Earth, and use them to ward off the three-headed space dragon. Glad to get rid of the titanic terrors, Earth’s governments agree”¦ but can the aliens be trusted?

A fun mix of 60’s space opera and giant monster mayhem, ASTRO-MONSTER is a colorful, fun and exciting creature feature. Nick Adams is great as the randy, hotheaded American astronaut, while series regular Kumi Mizuno makes an extremely fetching alien. Former menaces Godzilla and Rodan have completely morphed into heroic creatures by this film, firmly on the side of Earth and humanity. The FX scenes are well crafted, with the 3-way monster battle on Planet X particularly memorable, if too brief.

Classic Media/Genius Entertainment’s new DVD edition features both the Japanese and slightly altered American (GODZILLA VS. MONSTER ZERO) versions of the film in their proper 2.40:1 anamorphic widescreen aspect ratios. The Japanese version includes English subtitles. Extra features include an audio commentary by author Stuart Galbraith IV, an image gallery, poster gallery and the original Japanese trailer.

You know how much I like these movies, and Classic Media’s special editions are first rate. Highly recommended.

mohtheblackcat.jpg

Jeffrey Combs gives a tour de force performance as Edgar Allan Poe for frequent collaborator Stuart Gordon (RE-ANIMATOR, FROM BEYOND, CASTLE FREAK) as the acclaimed horror director takes his second stab (after 1991’s THE PIT AND THE PENDULUM) at the works of the tortured American author, with MASTERS OF HORROR: THE BLACK CAT (2007).

Working again with frequent writing partner Dennis Paoli, Gordon has deftly combined elements of Poe’s own real life with the events of the famous short story. The result is a nightmarish descent into madness. I don’t want to give a synopsis here: to do so would betray some of the short film’s best surprises, but I will say that even with the liberties taken, it may be the most faithful adaptation of the Poe classic ever committed to film.

Atmospherically shot by Jon Joffin, THE BLACK CAT has the look and feel of a Val Lewton 40’s B&W horror classic (specifically, THE BODY SNATCHER), with the only vivid color being the red of blood. And there’s plenty of that, as Gordon gleefully indulges his flair for gore. The make-up job on Combs is excellent; the likeness to Poe is amazing. Performances are excellent across the board, with Elyse Levesque’s sensitive and moving portrayal of Virginia Poe being of special note.

THE BLACK CAT comes to DVD in a perfect 1.78:1 anamorphic widescreen transfer, with Dolby 5.1 Surround sound. As usual, Starz/Anchor Bay has provided a plethora of bonus material, including a couple of “Making Of” featurettes, a great commentary track by Gordon and Combs, a photo gallery, and trailers for other MASTERS OF HORROR titles.

As a fan of Stuart Gordon’s work in the genre, I loved it. Recommended.

hulk02.jpg

Universal’s new release of THE INCREDIBLE HULK ““ THE COMPLETE SECOND SEASON (1978-79) lives up to the quality of the first volume, with the entire sophomore season of the popular series on five discs.

As Season Two kicks off, Dr. David Banner meets and marries a terminally ill scientist, and continues to wander the country, helping people in need and searching for a cure, while managing to “Hulk-out” at least twice a show.

Comic book fans can be pretty unforgiving about media adaptations of their favorite characters, and this show often takes a lot of heat for the changes made to the character and his milieu. But for the budget, and considering the realities of network television in 70’s, I think producer Kenneth Johnson made absolutely the right choices in developing the show. His FUGITIVE meets JECKYLL & HYDE approach not only allowed him to do some decent adult drama (usually) but get some serious mileage out of the fantasy elements, too.

Generally smart scripting (there’s only a couple of clunkers in the bunch) and the rock-steady presence of Bill Bixby as the sympathetic and believable Banner, made THE INCREDIBLE HULK one of the best fantasy shows of its era.

Season Two presents all 22 episodes in decent full-frame transfers. Colors are good, and there’s relatively little wear or damage evident in the source prints. This volume includes an introduction by producer Kenneth Johnson, and a Johnson commentary track over the season premiere episode, “Married.” The set also includes a bonus episode from Season Three.

Recommended.

isis.jpg

Another Seventies superhero show, Filmations THE SECRETS OF ISIS (1975) has also just come to DVD courtesy of BCI.

The star of one of Saturday morning’s first live-action adventure shows, the lovely Isis (sultry Joanna Cameron) fought crime and saved lives every week, usually managing to teach a nice moral lesson, too. With the occasional assistance of SHAZAM’s Captain Marvel, the bookish high school chemistry teacher with the powers of an ancient Egyptian goddess gave prime time’s Wonder Woman a run for her money as TV’s sexiest super heroine for two seasons. (And for my money, Isis wins.)

BCI’s new DVD set includes all 22 episodes of the classic kid’s show, in full-frame transfers. Unfortunately, as the show was shot on cheap 16mm stock, usually outdoors, the source material looks very faded, grainy and washed out. It’s still watchable, but don’t go expecting reference quality transfers from this 30-year-old low budget program. As with the label’s other Filmation releases, there’s plenty of great bonus materials. There’s almost 2 hours of on-camera interviews with the producers crew, and cast of the show (excluding Cameron, unfortunately), isolated music and FX tracks on selected episodes, a commentary on episode 15, Three extensive still galleries, scripts on DVD-ROM, and a complete episode of the animated series FREEDOM FORCE, which also featured the Isis character. There is also the usual slew of BCI/Filmation trailers.

Another childhood favorite comes to disc courtesy of BCI, and since Joanna Cameron was one of my first celebrity crushes, I’m grateful to have the series on DVD today.

DVD LATE SHOW CAPSULE REVIEWS!

In my continuing efforts to catch up with the notable discs that piled up during the last few months, here’s some more “Capsule Reviews” of DVDs that are long overdue for some Late Show attention:

sexualstoryofo.jpg

THE SEXUAL STORY OF O (1984). One of Jess Franco’s more coherent productions, this erotic epic actually has no connection to the famous “Story of O” (novel or film), but was deceptively re-titled by the distributors. Lovely Alicia Príncipe is seduced into a swinging three-way by an adventurous couple, and it’s all fun and games until they introduce their young conquest to a decadent older couple who are into S&M. Then, things take a nasty turn. Not much of a plot, but Príncipe is beautiful, and so is much of the photography. Severin Films presents this minor Spanish sexploitation effort with a sparkling, 2.35:1 anamorphic widescreen transfer and English subtitles. There’s also a new interview with the prolific Franco, who seems rather proud of this one.

coolmccool.jpg

COOL McCOOL: THE COMPLETE SERIES (1966). Created by BATMAN creator Bob Kane, the crudely animated adventures of superspy Cool McCool mix GET SMART antics with BATMAN-styled villains in 20 incredibly stupid episodes. Even for the presumably less sophisticated kids of the Sixties, this stuff is insultingly bad. The villains (Hurricane Harry, the Owl, The Rattler, et al) are lame, the animation is terrible, and the vaunted voice work by Chuck McCann and others is pedestrian at best. Nonetheless, BCI’s Ink & Paint label presents the entire series on 3 discs, with solid full-frame transfers of slightly worn and faded source prints. As is usual with BCI, there’s a whole bunch of extras including audio commentaries, an interview and episode intros by the aforementioned McCann, A music video, and previews of other, better, Ink & Paint releases.

wanted02.jpg

WANTED DEAD OR ALIVE ““ THE COMPLETE SECOND SEASON (1959-60). The first season of this classic Western show, starring the young and intense Steve McQueen (BULLITT), was released three or four years ago by New Line Home Video, who then abandoned the series. Fortunately for fans, BCI has now picked up the license. The Season 2 set is packaged to complement the first one, with similar graphics and art direction. The only difference is that the four discs are packaged in slim cases this time around. The transfers look on a par with the earlier set, with a solid, B&W full-frame image. Only one extra this time: a featurette called “The Women of WANTED: DEAD OR ALIVE.” A great show, with expertly written 30-minute dramas, very well acted. Highly recommended.

For older Late Show columns (adding up to well over 200 reviews!), visit the newly updated-and-revamped DVD Late Show website and archive. For additional pop culture musings, occasional DVD previews and lots of shameless self-promotion, you might try checking out my blog.

Comments, DVD questions, review requests and offers of money can be sent to: dvdlateshow@atomicpulp.com

Nocturnal Admissions: DVD Review – Foyle’s War Set 4, Da Vinci’s Inquest Season 1

Filed under: Columns,Nocturnal Admissions,Quickcast Commentaries — UncaScroogeMcD @ 4:55 am

nocturnalheader5.gif

Foyle Da Vince boxes

In case you don’t know it yet, Foyle’s War is one of the best shows on the tube. There are several reasons for this. The program appears only intermittently, which gives the creator and writer Anthony Horowitz, time to research and develop each movie length script. The show is also perfectly cast, with Michael Kitchen as the reticent but firm Christopher Foyle, Anthony Howell as the dedicated Paul Milner, and Honeysuckle Weeks as Samantha Stewart, Foyle’s tomboyish red haired Police driver. And the mysteries themselves, always keyed to some long-forgotten but interesting aspect of life during wartime, are invariably clever.

Television fanatics have been retraining themselves over the past decade. In the old days, we watch prime time shows religiously from September to June, circling our itinerary in TV Guide (one of my favorite hobbies as a kid, anticipation always being greater than the reality). During the summer we moaned in agony, having to fall back on reading books (I used to methodically re-read all my Marvel comics from cover to cover, even the letters sections). Then, come autumn and school and the Fall previews issue of TV Guide, it would begin again.

Foyle title

But now we have adapted to different styles of programing. We can wait a year between episode samplings of The Sopranos, or follow shows that start only in January, like 24. I think it was the sequelitis of movies from the 1980s that helped train us, having to wait a year or two between Star Wars editions the way the kids today wait for Harry Potter movies. But in any case, the result is that we now accept the long waits between shows like Foyle’s War and so many other British crime imports.

Foyle intro

Now the fourth box of Foyle’s eps is out, thanks to Acorn Media (having just aired on PBS’s Mystery). Streeting on Tuesday, July 17th, the set contains four discs, each in a slim case, and retails for $59.99. It is a measure of the show’s increasing popularity that either the producers of the show or the DVD manufacturers are including more in the way of extras with each release. In this set, Michael Kitchen even steps forward to welcome the viewer to the DVD edition. It’s true that most of the supplements are still text features, such as cast bios and backgrounds to the episodes, but with each new box the producers offer longer and more interesting making ofs. The shortish doc included here lauds the show’s attention to period detail and emphasizes how each episode requires the time and effort of a feature film.

There is a modicum of confusion attached to this box, which is numbered 4, but which contains seasons four and five of Foyle’s War, which in England were only two episodes each. Series six, which is slated to air in the UK in 2008, will come to Americans as season five.

Foyle team

Taken all together, the Foyles will end up being a popular history of World War II from the viewpoint of those at home. For example, the first film in the set, “Invasion” takes place in 1942, and concerns the invasion of England by – the Americans. Aside from an exploration of the resulting tensions and opportunities, there is a clever mystery and a touching story of friendship. Also set in 1942 is “Bad Blood,” which concerns a biological warfare test that goes awry, and the murder hidden within it. Later in 1942 comes “Bleak Midwinter,” in which murders take place around a munitions works, and Milner’s ex-wife is also killed. Finally, “Casualties of War,” set in early 1943, concerns a fascinating aspect of experimental warfare that is also covered in the movie The Dam Busters, and also touches on issues such as a woman’s place in the world of men. But the mystery itself ends on a morally ambiguous note, and the plot itself concludes on something of a cliffhanger.

If you are coming late to Foyle, however, don’t start with this box. Like all the great shows, such as The Wire, The Shield, and BSG, it’s best to start at the beginning and work your way forward. You won’t be able to stop, and you won’t be able to not re-watch them.

Da Vinci title

No such problem with another show now on offer from Acorn Media. This is Da Vinci’s Inquest, the cult hit Canadian show now just introduced to American home video. Set in Vancouver, B.C., Da Vinci’s Inquest concerns the cases confronted by the bibulous, divorced coroner Dominic Da Vinci, played by Nicholas Campbell, perhaps best known in the states for playing parts in Cronenberg films such as The Brood. Da Vinci’s Inquest began airing in 1998 with the first of seven 13-episode seasons. This box from Acorn contains all of season one in full frame transfers (that look a little soft. It hit the street on February 27th, and retails for $59.99; for those impatient to see other seasons, Atlantis Alliance has released them in Canada).

The Acorn box doesn’t have much in the way of supplements, just cast bios and a trailer, but just having the shows all together in the right order should be enough for the series’s mounting fans. Da Vinci’s Inquest has been popping up on local stations over the past year or so, but out of order and with the seasons mixed up. But from its cozy jazz theme song to its wholly different world of law and order, Da Vinci’s Inquest has pulled in viewers. It’s mix of flawed characters, occasionally ambiguous endings (who killed the professional dominatrix at the end of episode 7, “The Stranger Inside,” even though the case had been solved?), and refreshingly different approach to now-familiar territory (forensic medicine doctors examining gross bodies) has appealed to intelligent viewers.

Da Vinci's Da Vinci

As a forensic show, Da Vinci’s Inquest appeared two years before the somewhat harder edged CSI: Crime Scene Investigations, but Da Vinci’s Inquest integrates the problems of the characters better into both the plots and the texture of the show. And Da Vinci is loosely based on a real guy, former chief coroner Larry Campbell, who ended winning a mayoral race in Vancouver in 2002 (an eventual spin off of Da Vinci’s Inquest was the short lived Da Vinci’s City Hall). Like presumably his real life counterpart, Da Vinci’s cares too much, is confrontational with bureaucratic ineptitude, and is prone to joining or starting causes, such as in one episode the use of teen agers as drug informants. He’s an admirable character but also a troubled one, and an episode in which Da Vinci fears that he is the perpetrator of a hit and run accident is painful to watch on his behalf. His “solution” to his problem, show in the last shot, will shock Puritanical American viewers.

Da Vinci’s Inquest is a great series and it is a comfort to know that there are six (or seven) more boxes in the pipeline.

Quick Stop Thingamabobs: 7/18/2007

Filed under: Columns,Thingamabobs — UncaScroogeMcD @ 4:49 am

thingamabobs.jpg

The web. It’s a big place, full of plenty of distractions ““ some funny, some informative, some ludicrous, some disturbing, some inane, some profound. Each and every weekday, we present links to a few of our favorite finds”¦

————————————————

  • And Popeye does the same for Cocoa Puffs… (Thingamabob)
  • And we close things with Wilson Fisk’s ball… (Thingamabob)

Have a THINGAMABOB? Send it in!

##

July 17, 2007

Toy Box: What you lookin’ at?

Filed under: Columns,Toy Box — admin @ 5:47 am

toybox.jpg

At first, the title of this review may not seem to make sense. With the Simpsons movie hitting in a couple weeks, Mcfarlane did the smart thing and got the toys out. I’ve already covered the four Movie Mayhem figures in the standard line up, but tonight I’ll look at the boxed set called… are you ready for it?… “What you lookin’ at?”.

If you’re one of those folks that is extremely adverse to spoilers, and want to know absolutely nothing about a film before it comes out, stop reading now. This set doesn’t give away any more about the plot of the movie (as far as I can tell) than the trailers have, but I just want to be sure you’re fully away that one of the three figures in this diorama but be considered spoilerific by some of the more anal retentive movie goers.

The set is hitting stores like FYE and Suncoast right now, but you can actually get a better deal online. I have some suggestions at the end of the review as always, and if you have any questions or comments drop me a line.

“What You Lookin’ At?”

I don’t know exactly what’s gone wrong in Springfield, but clearly something has. Just look at this playset and you can see that…why the Hell would Bart be fishing with Ned Flanders? Oh, the humanity!

review_moviesimps_1.jpg

Packaging – ***
This set comes in a box, and like the clamshelled individual figures, Mcfarlane has gone small and compact. I’m a big fan of small and compact, and the movie graphics look great. This box also shows off the diorama pretty well, and it certainly protects it. The back of the package gives you some Simpsons trivia and shows some hand drawn cels from the film, which is a nice plus.

review_moviesimps_2.jpg

Sculpting – ***1/2
Ned and Bart are standing behind what I originally thought was a bush, but now believe is a rock with mossy grass on it. They are peering over at the many eyed mutated squirrel in front, who has almost as many nasty sharp teeth as eyes. The sculpt on all three of these characters is great, managing to pull off the tricky switch from 2-D to 3-D with nary a hitch.

review_moviesimps_3.jpg

There’s the right amount of detail here for the style of animation, including the nicely done open faced spinning reel on Ned’s fishing pole, the nylon fishing line, and the size of Ned’s glasses. The scale between these figures is good, and if Ned were standing, he’d be about the same height as the Homer figures from Mcfarlane’s other releases (just over 4″ tall).

review_moviesimps_6.jpg

Clearly this is a very movie specific moment, and I’m cool with that. Their regular line should cover the show, but these figures should bring movie scenes to us as much as possible. I’m hoping that this particular scene is both memorable and critical to the plot of the show.

Paint – ***
The previous animated figures from Mcfarlane have been hit or miss in this category, but it looks like they went all out for the movie release. There’s still a spot of slop here or there, but the overall quality has gone up, and from looking at quite a few figures and dioramas on the shelves, the consistency of that quality also seems to have gone up.

review_moviesimps_4.jpg

There’s a liberal use of black outlining here, everywhere from Ned’s ears to Bart’s shoes. However, it works great on this set, and there’s only a bit of slop to be seen in these thin lines. Most of the slop that is here is on the base itself, in the paint work on the twigs and rocks, and not on the three figures.

Articulation – *1/2
There’s not much articulation here – remember, this is a ‘diorama’, and not really designed for a lot of posing. Bart has a cut neck, and Flanders has a cut neck and cut shoulders. That way you can get them in the best ‘shocked and in hiding’ pose possible.

Accessories – ***
How you score this area depends on what you consider the accessories. I’m grading it as though the base, rock and sign are the accessories, while the Bart, Flanders and squirrel are all the ‘figures’.

The “No dumping” sign fits nicely in a peg hole on the base, and the large rock pops onto a couple large pegs in the center. The base isn’t quite as nicely painted as the figures, with some sloppy edges and bleed on several of the rocks and twigs, but there’s plenty of little details sculpted onto the ground. One of the things I like about this base is that unlike some of the earlier ones from Mcfarlane, it doesn’t feel crowded. Everything is here that needs to be here, and while it’s compact, it doesn’t seem cramped.

The rock has some nice sculpted texturing too that doesn’t come through quite as well in photos as it does in person, hence my original confusion on what it was.

review_moviesimps_5.jpg

Talking Feature – ***
There’s no ‘try me’ feature on the sound chip, because these don’t come with the 2 AAA batteries necessary to make them work. Obviously, the negative there is that you need to spend some more cash to get them to talk. There is a positive though, at least for the MIBers, who won’t have to worry about battery corrosion over time.

The set says the following lines:

Ned – “You know, whenever my boys bake up a batch of frownies, I take ’em fishing”; “Well, this certainly seems odd, but who am I to question the work of the Almight!”; “If you look real close, you can almost YEEAAGHH!”
Bart – “Jabbity, jabbity, jab jab jab!”; “I’m troubled”;

That’s a fair number of lines for the price tag, and clearly right from the movie. The speaker (and button to activate it) is right on top, allowing the sound to be loud and clear. There’s no static or gabled sound, and the overall quality of the feature is quite good. I’m not big on sound features when there are no classic lines – Lost is a great example – but the Simpsons have always been a perfect license for this sort of gimmick.

Value – ***
The single figures are running $12 – $15 each depending on where you pick them up. I already ragged on what a lousy value that is, but this set (with three figures, sound, and a nifty boulder) is only running $16 – $20. That’s a much better value than the single figures.

Fun Factor – **
The talking feature is fun for your co-workers, at least the first fifty times they press the button. But these are intended as pop culture collectibles, not ‘toys’. This isn’t a category that will effect my overall impression, since I know that going in, but you might feel quite a bit differently.

Things to Watch Out For –
If you’re picking them off the shelf, watch the paint, but from what I’ve seen – and I’ve actually seen quite a few of these now – the paint ops have been much more consistently good this time around.

Overall – ***
I haven’t been thrilled to death with some of the early Mcfarlane Simpsons work – the Ironic Punishment set was an unfortunate way to start off the line – but the movie figures have all really been well done. I’m enjoying these, and would love an entire Simpsons universe, like WOS, in this scale. We’ve got a snowball’s chance in Hell of that actually happening, but it’s nice to see that what we are getting has improved in quality. I can’t wait to see the Manimals set now, and I hope that the interest in this line will be at least strong enough to get a few more of these diorama sets out.

Scoring Recap –
Packaging – ***
Sculpting – ***1/2
Paint – ***
Articulation – *1/2
Accessories – ***
Talking Feature – ***
Fun Factor – **
Value – ***
Overall – ***

Where to Buy –
Online options include:

– Amazing Toyz has them in stock with most of the regular figures at $12 (I&S run $14) and the dioramas at $16.

– CornerStoreComics hast the singles at $12, but the only way to get I&S is to order the full set of 6 figures for $68. They also have the dioramas at $16.

– Clark Toys has most of the regular figures at $12 and the playsets at $18. For some reason they have Marge and Lisa at $30…?

Related Links –
I’ve covered an awful lot of Simpsons merchandise over the years. Hit this link for links to just about all of them!

Quick Stop Thingamabobs: 7/17/2007

Filed under: Columns,Thingamabobs — UncaScroogeMcD @ 5:42 am

thingamabobs.jpg

The web. It’s a big place, full of plenty of distractions ““ some funny, some informative, some ludicrous, some disturbing, some inane, some profound. Each and every weekday, we present links to a few of our favorite finds”¦

————————————————

  • Leonard Cohen & Sonny Rollins perform “Who By Fire” live… (Thingamabob)
  • And Cohen’s “Hallelujah”, live… (Thingamabob)
  • Rufus Wainwright’s take on the tune… (Thingamabob)
  • Surely you’ve heard of Captain Nice… (Thingamabob)
  • And we end with Maxwell Smart meeting Siegfried… (Thingamabob)

Have a THINGAMABOB? Send it in!

##

July 16, 2007

Monkey Talk with Paul Dini: Stuffed Animal Stand-Up with Rashy #4

Filed under: Monkey Talk,Quickcasts,Video — UncaScroogeMcD @ 3:14 am

monkeytalkheader.jpg

-By Paul Dini & Rashy

Paul Dini’s “Monkey Talk” (co-hosted by his irrepressible sock monkey son, Rashy) returns with Rashy’s continued attempts to break into the dog-eat-dog world of Stuffed Animal Stand-Up. Be sure to check out Rashy’s official site at LittleRashy.com…

monkeytalk2007-06-12.jpg

DOWNLOAD:
Large
(560 x 420 – QuickTime – 9.02 MB)
Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 3.90 MB)

##

Comics in Context #185: Get Off Of My Cloud

Filed under: Columns,Comics in Context — admin @ 1:54 am

comicsincontext4.jpg

cic2007-07-09-01.jpgEvery summer I watch a good deal of the Wimbledon tennis championships, which this year were particularly plagued by rain, forcing continual delays. Repeatedly ESPN2 would show the sky overhead, as ominous clouds moved into view. And this year I found myself thinking, oh, look, it’s Galactus. The version from the new movie Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer, that is.

Why, this is the worst extraterrestrial threat to Wimbledon since the giant alien blancmange from Monty Python’s Flying Circus .

Last weekend I visited the Brooklyn Museum and stopped by my favorite painting in its collection, Albert Bierstadt’s “A Storm in the Rocky Mountains, Mt. Rosalie” (1866). Take a look for yourself. If the moviemakers were going to cast a cloud as Galactus, why couldn’t they have made it look as threatening as this thunderhead?

But as I explained last week would have preferred that the movie had given us the Stan Lee and Jack Kirby Galactus, that awe-inspiring god of wrath, rather than a puff of smoke with no dialogue, character or point of view.

In their greatest multi-part story, the “Galactus trilogy” (Fantastic Four Vol. 1 #48-50, 1966), Lee and Kirby presented three godlike beings: Galactus, the benevolent but normally passive Uatu the Watcher, and the Silver Surfer, a science-fictional version of an angel, who becomes a self-sacrificing Christ figure. Last week I dealt with the first two, and this week I address the problems in the movie’s treatment of the third.

One problem is that the film attempts but fails to resolve satisfactorily the contradiction between the conception of the Silver Surfer’s personality in Lee and Kirby’s “Galactus trilogy,” and the conception of the Surfer that Stan Lee evolved in the character’s series later in the 1960s.

In the trilogy the Surfer initially seems utterly alien, devoid of empathy for the lives of ordinary mortals, and of any other emotions. The Surfer does not question the morality of Galactus’s intended destruction of the human race, nor does the Surfer feel any guilt upon his own role as Galactus’s accomplice. The Surfer seems to share his master’s opinion that humans are lesser beings than themselves, with no more value than ants. “Earth is but a twinkling dot. . .a paltry pebble. . .in the vastness of space,” the Surfer says. How could its inhabitants have any significance?

By an incredible coincidence, which nonetheless fits the logic of a fable, the Surfer crash-lands into the home of Alicia Masters, the blind sculptress who was the girlfriend of Ben Grimm, the Fantastic Four’s Thing. It is the literally blind, metaphorically angelic Alicia who figuratively opens the Surfer’s eyes to the value of humanity. She argues on behalf of the human race’s worthiness to exist. But it is Alicia herself who is her own strongest argument. She treats the Surfer with kindness and concern when he falls into her home; he is impressed by her bravery in standing up to him. “Never have I heard such words. . .sensed such courage. . . or known this strange feeling. . .this new emotion!” the Surfer exclaims in wonder. ” There is a word some races use. . .that I have never understood. . .until now! At last. . .I know beauty!” The context indicates that he does not simply mean Alicia’s physical beauty; it is her personality that he finds beautiful. And in their meeting, Alicia is the spokeswoman and representative for the entire human race. In recognizing Alicia’s beauty, the Surfer perceives the “beauty” of humanity.

Earlier Alicia had shown pity to the Surfer: “Your face!” she exclaims as she touches his visage; “Never have I sensed such unimaginable loneliness in a living being!” Perhaps when the Surfer was talking about Earth’s insignificance in the universe, consciously or not he was voicing his own sense of the meaninglessness of his existence. But now, through his interaction with Alicia, the Surfer discovers his empathy for the human race: “never have I felt this new sensation. . .this thing some call. . .pity!” Stan Lee’s line may strike you as purple and corny, but it captures the Surfer’s struggle to comprehend this new emotion awakening within him. Alicia not only opens the Surfer’s eyes to humanity’s worth, but also to his own capacity for emotion and even nobility. “Then you are not just a soulless monster!” she tells him. “You too have emotions! I knew it! I felt it from the first!” Earlier the Surfer told her that the concept of “nobility” was meaningless to him, but you can read it in the poetic quality of the language that Stan Lee gives him. By the end of Fantastic Four Vol. 1 #49, the Surfer is acting on that nobility, willing to challenge his master on behalf of a race of mortals who to him are represented by that one blind young woman.

It is significant that it is Alicia who converts the Surfer to the side of humanity, not, for example, Fantastic Four leader Reed Richards. She is a woman, who in this story represents traditional “feminine” values, including compassion, mercy, and the life force. Moreover, whereas the Fantastic Four are warriors, Alicia is an artist. How fitting that an artist should open the eyes of this alien warrior to the concept of beauty.

Except for the final issue, Stan Lee collaborated with artist John Buscema, not Jack Kirby, on The Silver Surfer comics series of the late 1960s. In it Lee radically altered the Surfer’s backstory. He revealed that the Surfer was once a mortal humanoid named Norrin Radd who lived on the paradise-like planet of Zenn-La, where he was passionately in love with a woman named Shalla Bal. In order to save his homeworld from Galactus, Norrin Radd agreed to become his herald, and to lead him to other worlds to devour; Galactus therefore transformed him into the Silver Surfer.

The Surfer of the Galactus trilogy has never before experienced “pity.” The Norrin Radd of Silver Surfer Vol. 1 #1 feels “pity” and empathy for his fellow Zenn-Lavians that he gave up his world in order to save them. The Surfer of Fantastic Four #49 had not known what “beauty” is, but Norrin Radd of Silver Surfer #1 idealizes the gorgeous Shalla Bal. The Silver Surfer whom readers meet in Fantastic Four #48 seems devoid of emotion, and yet Norrin Radd in Silver Surfer #1 is a man of intense emotion, still longing for his lost love.

In the Galactus trilogy the Surfer learns to aspire towards the virtues of humanity: he recognizes that the human race possess qualities that are missing from his own existence. The Surfer proves willing to sacrifice his own life in order to save the lives of this race of mortals he has learned to admire. In contrast, in Lee and Buscema’s Silver Surfer series, the Surfer seems morally superior to humanity, and is continually bemoaning the sins and failings of the human race. In the Galactus trilogy humanity, as represented by Alicia, is the Surfer’s teacher; in the Lee-Buscema Silver Surfer series, the Surfer is a moral paragon who has much to teach humanity.

How can these two approaches to the Silver Surfer be reconciled? At Marvel it was finally established that “over time Galactus subtly altered the Surfer’s mind, submerging Radd’s emotions and repressing past memories“ which were reawakened by Alicia.

Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer puts the Surfer in the same position he occupies in the Galactus trilogy (as Galactus’s herald who ultimately rebels), but allows him to retain his past memories: at one point he identifies himself as Norrin Radd and says that he had to serve Galactus to save his own planet. Can we imagine the idealistic, highly sensitive Silver Surfer of the Lee-Buscema series waiting until the last third of the movie to decide that planetwide genocide is a bad thing? Could that version of the Surfer live with himself after helping Galactus destroy a long series of planets, as the movie informs us he did?

These questions are especially important in that in the movie, rebelling against Galactus turns out to be no big deal. After all, the onscreen Galactus is just a cloud, and the Surfer manages to blow him up relatively easily and still succeed in surviving, apparently unharmed.

But let’s say that the filmmakers regarded the Surfer as having so little conscience that he was willing to help destroy other planets as long as his native world was spared. So what brings about the Surfer’s decision to rebel against Galactus?

In the movie the Surfer never encounters Alicia. That’s unfortunate, since it would have given Alicia (and Kerry Washington, the actress who plays her) a bigger, more significant role in the movie, and it is important in the Galactus trilogy that it is an ordinary person, not a superhero, who convinces the Surfer to spare the human race. Instead, the Surfer principally talks with Susan Storm, the Invisible Girl, a good alternate choice for representing traditionally “feminine” values.

But there is no equivalent in the film to the persuasion scenes between Alicia and the Surfer in the comics. I hope that you can tell from my description of them, and the quotations I’ve excerpted, that Lee’s dialogue for these scenes has the potential for great dramatic power. They would have provided insight into the complexity of the Surfer’s personality and made clear why he switches sides. Furthermore, Alicia’s embodiment of the finest attributes of humanity and the awakening of the Surfer’s conscience could have been both moving and inspiring. Their scenes together could have been the heart of the film.

But this was not to be. Although the filmmakers cast Laurence Fishburne as the voice of the Silver Surfer, they give him surprisingly little dialogue. In the comics Alicia can sense the Surfer’s nobility from the elevated language that Stan Lee gives him; I doubt that audiences can detect any such nobility in the sparsity of the movie Surfer’s dialogue. Lee was aiming at Shakespearean effects when he write for the Surfer; if only the screenwriters had similar ambitions.

Indeed, the Lee-Kirby Surfer suffers a tragic fate. In the comics Galactus is far more difficult to overcome than a storm cloud. I see that Jack Kirby explicitly referred to the Surfer as a “fallen angel”. In the Galactus trilogy the Surfer is like an angel rebelling against God. But in this case, Lucifer’s counterpart, the Surfer is in the right. Unlike the Biblical Lucifer, the Surfer is humanity’s friend and defender, and Galactus, in the role of God, is out to destroy humanity. Despite his best efforts, the Surfer cannot defeat Galactus, just as Lucifer had no chance of overthrowing God.

God punished Lucifer’s revolt by casting him from heaven into hell. Galactus punishes the Silver Surfer’s revolt by casting him from the heavens onto the Earth. Galactus removes the Surfer’s ability to travel through outer space. Lee and Kirby later altered this idea: the Surfer could still fly through outer space, but Galactus had erected an energy barrier around the Earth, attuned to the Surfer’s powers, imprisoning the Surfer there. For the Surfer, a creature of the heavens, this was like crippling a bird’s wings.

Moreover, the Surfer’s fate can be interpreted as an intriguing variation on the position of Christ in the Gospels. In Christianity, God the Father and God the Son were in accord: the Son willingly lived on Earth as a man among other men, and willingly acceded to his crucifixion and death to redeem humanity. In the Galactus trilogy, the Surfer’s confinement to Earth, to live among humans, is presented as a terrible punishment. Indeed, the Surfer becomes more obviously a Christ figure in the Lee-Buscema series: a literally unearthly figure of spiritual purity, who seeks to do good, but meets with incomprehension, fear, and even hatred from much (but not all) of mankind.

Does Rise of the Silver Surfer depict the Silver Surfer as a tragic figure? No. Does the film explore the Biblical analogies underlying Galactus and the Surfer? No, again.

The filmmakers also miss the point when they have the Surfer defeat the Galactus cloud. It is significant that Lee and Kirby did not allow the Surfer to overcome Galactus. Rather, Lee and Kirby’s point was that it was humanity itself which ultimately had to stand up to Galactus, the god of wrath, and to force him to acknowledge its right to exist. The Surfer provides aid, but the human race must win its own battles. In the Galactus trilogy, the Surfer battles heroically but finally falls before Galactus. It is Reed Richards, armed with Galactus’s own weapon, the Ultimate Nullifier, who finally compels Galactus to leave Earth.

Here is yet another problem with the Fantastic Four films. Pandering to American culture’s anti-intellectualism, these movies continually mock Reed Richards, a. k. a. Mr. Fantastic, the scientific genius who leads the team, as a nerd and a dork. In Rise of the Silver Surfer Reed finally asserts himself and tells off a general who has been pushing him around. But I cannot see the movies’ version of Reed summoning up enough of a sense of authority to successfully confront Lee and Kirby’s nearly omnipotent Galactus. Lee and Kirby might have Ben Grimm kid Reed from time to time, but they portrayed Richards’ towering intellect as worthy of admiration. Lee and Kirby depicted Reed Richards as a great leader and hero, never a fool, and at the climax of the Galactus trilogy, Richards effectively becomes humanity’s representative and leader, forcing their most formidable enemy to back down. A human being stares at God, and this time God blinks.

As the Watcher, who can be interpreted as the benign aspect of God, tells Galactus, these “children”–the humans–have earned their right to live on this planet. The Galactus trilogy is a parable about humanity rising from “children” who live in fear to adults who take charge of their own lives. But in Rise of the Silver Surfer, it’s the Surfer who confronts Galactus, not any of us humans, and so the point is lost.

Last week I stated that Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer adapts three classic storylines from the comics. The third is the serial that runs from Fantastic Four Vol. 1 #56 through #60 (1966-1967), in which Doctor Doom steals the powers of the Silver Surfer. I’m particularly fond of this saga since Fantastic Four #58 was the first Fantastic Four comic I ever read. This storyline would have made a fine sequel to Rise of the Silver Surfer, but, no, the filmmakers cram it into Rise and bungle yet another classic Lee-Kirby story.

As in the Galactus trilogy, this storyline includes a memorable persuasion scene. Remember that the Lee-Kirby version of the Surfer was entirely alien, without knowledge or experience of the ways of humanity. He was an innocent, who, among other things, did not comprehend the concept of deceit. Hence, upon arriving at Doctor Doom’s castle, he naively believes Doom’s spiel about being a benefactor of humanity, or at least gives Doom the benefit of the doubt. Lee and Kirby have fun with the scene, as Doom goes over the top: he wouldn’t deceive any of us, but the unearthly Surfer has no experience of lying. But the scene soon turns very serious: Doom grants the surfer a telescopic view of outer space, and while the Surfer is rapt with joy at the sight of his lost paradise, Doom attacks him from behind, using his technology to forcibly absorb the alien’s cosmic energies. (Now that I’m writing about it, I realize this is like a metaphorical rape scene.)

If Galactus is God, and the Surfer is either Christ or a fallen angel, then Doctor Doom is metaphorically the Devil, who deceives and conquers the innocent Surfer. (Stan Lee would continue this theme, making it more explicit, when he introduced the Surfer’s literally demonic archfoe Mephisto in Silver Surfer Vol. 1 #3 in 1968.)

cic2007-07-16-02.jpgThe metaphorical premise of the rest of this storyline becomes: What if the Devil became all-powerful? What if Evil proved to be unstoppable? Fantastic Four Vol. 1 #58, my first issue, demonstrates that the Fantastic Four cannot defeat Doctor Doom, whose power now overwhelms theirs; the following issues show Doom wreaking havoc across the entire world, whose nations are likewise helpless to stop him. Ultimately it is Reed Richards, through his great intellect, who brings about Doom’s defeat by finding a way to turn the power of Galactus (that energy barrier enveloping Earth) against him.

In Rise there is no such dramatic persuasion scene: Doom does not trick the Surfer out of his power. In fact, in Rise the Surfer has no cosmic powers: the powers are said to be in his surfboard. All that Doctor Doom needs to do to steal those powers is hop on board. Thus the filmmakers diminish the Surfer. In the comics, by stealing his powers, Doctor Doom usurped the power of a god, while reducing the Surfer to the level of a helpless mortal. In the movie, the Surfer never had any innate godlike abilities to begin with. Presumably FF mailman Willie Lumpkin could have become cosmically powered if he stepped onto that cosmic surfboard. (Hey, now there’s a cameo role for Stan Lee that I wouldn’t mind seeing as a DVD special feature!)

The movie also fails to establish that the FF could not defeat a cosmically-powered Doom through physical force. The running gag in which Johnny Storm temporarily absorbs his teammates’ powers finally pays off dramatically when he uses those extra powers to battle and defeat the cosmic Doctor Doom. (I get it: Johnny and Doom are both using someone else’s powers.) In effect, Johnny becomes like the Super-Skrull, the Lee-Kirby villain who possessed all the same powers as the FF. But that still shouldn’t be sufficient to stop someone with the full powers of the Silver Surfer circa FF Vol. 1 #48-60. Thus the movie muffs the idea of Evil as omnipotent and invincible.

If you want to see that idea done right, watch for the final two episodes of the third series of the new Doctor Who, currently being telecast in the U.S. on the Sci-Fi Channel. Executive producer/writer Russell T. Davies’ epic, suspenseful, and thrilling series finales for Doctor Who should be required viewing for every director and screenwriter of superhero movies (See Ken Plume’s interview with Davies here.)

The worst problem with the film’s Doom storyline is Doom himself. With the possible exception of Darkseid, Doctor Doom is the greatest villain of the superhero genre, and yet in these two FF movies he comes across as a lightweight. Early on in Rise we see, through deep shadows, that Doom’s face is scarred, as is in the comics, but soon his face gets fixed. At least Doom is apparently no longer made of organic metal, as he was in the first film, but the scarred face, symbolizing his soul, is essential to the character. Since he has no scars, it doesn’t make sense for him to war that metal mask later in the film. Moreover, though the movie states Doom is from Latveria (So why doesn’t he have an Eastern European accent?), it doesn’t establish that he is its monarch, dwelling in a medieval castle: hence, Doom’s suit of armor and medieval costume make no sense, either. Actor Julian McMahon is simply miscast: his voice isn’t resonant enough for Doom, and he doesn’t project the character’s genius, obsessiveness, regality, charisma, and sheer menace.

How hard can it be to cast, write and direct a major supervillain correctly in the movies? There are so many examples of successful performances of megavillains: Ian McKellen’s Magneto; Christopher Lee’s Dracula, Saruman, and Count Dooku; Donald Pleasence’s Blofeld; and Anthony Hopkins’ Hannibal Lecter; and Peter Cushing’s Baron Von Frankenstein and Grand Moff Tarkin, to name just a few. There are those of us who think that Darth Vader was partly inspired by Lee and Kirby’s Doctor Doom. Would that the Fantastic Four movies would use Darth Vader as an inspiration for how to play Doctor Doom!

First, the Daredevil (2003) movie squeezed Frank Miller’s long “Elektra Saga” into a single film and drained it of intelligence and passion. Then X-Men: The Last Stand (2006) botched Chris Claremont and John Byrne’s “Dark Phoenix Saga” (see “Comics in Context” #134–135). Now Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer screws up Lee and Kirby’s towering achievement, the Galactus trilogy. Why does this keep happening? It’s understandable that filmmakers are drawn to some of the greatest storylines in Marvel Comics history, but the resulting screen adaptations show no sign that anyone involved truly comprehended what made them work in the comics.

I like to think that there are directors, screenwriters and producers out there, or people who will someday become directors, screenwriters, or producers, who know the original comics and are disappointed at how poorly the movies adapted them. Warner Brothers started its first series of Superman movies in 1978 and its first string of Batman films in 1989: both series degenerated into camp by the third installment. Now, in the first years of the new century, Warners has begun its Batman and Superman film series anew, in the hands of filmmakers who are intent on treating the material with understanding and respect and avoiding the mistakes of the past.

Perhaps in fifteen or twenty years there will be new series of Fantastic Four, Spider-Man and X-Men movies for a new generation. Maybe there will be a new film adaptation of the Galactus trilogy, either in live action or animation, that will be faithful to Lee and Kirby’s masterpiece. Possibly two decades hence we will listen to the commentary track on that film’s DVD (or whatever format is current then), in which the director and writers explain how disappointed they were with Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer, and how they were determined to get the Galactus trilogy right this time.

It’ll be a long wait, but I’d like to think this would happen. Hey, did any of us back in the 1960s think that there would ever be a live action movie of the Galactus trilogy, even a bad one?

As you may recall, I didn’t like the 2005 Fantastic Four movie, either (see “Comics in Context” #93). But I finally found a good reason for finally acquiring the FF DVD (besdides the superb documentary about Jack Kirby on the new “Extended Edition”).

One was that I realized that watching the FF movie by itself is like eating a peanut butter and jelly sandwich without the jelly. The Fantastic Four movie is incomplete unless you are simultaneously listening to the RiffTrax audio commentary track that is designed to go with it.

cic2007-07-16-03.jpgLike Quick Stop editor Ken Plume and other individuals of discerning taste, I was a devoted fan of Mystery Science Theater 3000 (www.mst3kinfo.com/), the award-winning television series which ran on the Comedy Channel, Comedy Central and the Sci-Fi Channel in succession from 1988 to 1999. (Reruns continued on the Sci-Fi Channel into 2004, and many episodes are now available on DVD.)

MST3K specialized in transforming cinematic sow’s ears into postmodernist silk purses. Upon the foundation of an utterly godawful movie, usually an obscure, low budget genre film, MST3K‘s stable of writers built a dazzling structure of witty commentary, clever allusions to high and popular culture, jazz-like comedy riffs, and an appealingly ironic worldview. Thus the MST3K writer/performers converted the detritus of moviemaking into a dependably entertaining, and very often brilliant satire on American pop culture.

In recent years MST3K head writer and longtime performer Michael J. Nelson has resurrected the show’s comedic sensibility through RiffTrax (http://www.rifftrax.com/). These are MP3 commentary tracks, written and performed by Nelson and often some of his former MST3K cohorts, mocking various movies. For an inexpensive fee, you can download a RiffTrax MP3 from the site, and then play it on your computer or iPod or whatever while watching a DVD of the film that is RiffTrax’s chosen victim. When the MP3 and the DVD are properly synchronized, the comments by Nelson and his colleagues will pop up in between lines of dialogue in the film that is under attack.

Since this format doesn’t require obtaining the rights to the film being skewered, Nelson and company have been able to move upward to a better, bigger budget class of bad movies to heckle.

Sometimes RiffTrax selects a target that is actually a good movie, like The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001), but still imposes a perspective on it that turns it humorous: it had not occurred to me before listening to the Rings RiffTrax MP3 that Galadriel looks like an attendee at a Lilith Fair, or that the Balrog resembles Rowlf the Muppet if he had been set on fire.

But RiffTrax, like MST3K, is at its best when its target is eminently deserving of being riffed to shreds. I have recently had the privilege of watching Fantastic Four with the appropriate RiffTrax commentary, and now I cannot imagine wanting to experience the film any other way.

It’s like the way many individual issues of comic books these days provide unsatisfactory reading experiences because they’re ultimately meant to be collected and read in trade paperback form. Now I realize that the Fantastic Four movie wasn’t finished until Nelson and his colleague Kevin Murphy had recorded their commentary. If you listen to the FF RiffTrax MP3 without watching them, you won’t appreciate the jokes. If you watch the FF movie without the RiffTrax MP3, you probably won’t appreciate the movie. Put them together, and the magic happens.

Except for a reference to Marvel’s What If. . .? comic, the FF commentary doesn’t indicate knowledge of the FF comics, which is a bit surprising since the full crew of MST3K writers were renowned for their seemingly encyclopedic knowledge of pop culture. Still, all that Nelson and Murphy need for this film are their well-trained eyes for absurdity. I needed their commentary to keep reminding me that Doctor Doom’s fearsome mask starts out in the movie as (believe it or not) a humanitarian award! (So charity isn’t pretty?) My favorite bit in the entire track is the comment on the cameo performance as FF mailman Willie Lumpkin by a certain familiar figure. But what I am most grateful for is that Nelson and Murphy share my feeling that the FF movie makes Johnny Storm, the Human Torch, utterly obnoxious, and they never let up on him. “Is Johnny really supposed to be the most loathsome character in all of fiction?” Murphy wonders aloud at one point.

You can find out more about RiffTrax from Ken Plume’s Quick Stop interview with Michael J. Nelson, which includes the tale of Ken’s legendary bet with Avi Arad about the first FF movie, and one of Quick Stop’s holiday shopping columns. And Nelson, Murphy and MST3K veteran Bill Corbett (interviewed by Ken here) are also joining forces as the “Film Crew” to heckle various movies on DVDs released by Shout Factory. I won’t be attending this year’s San Diego Con, but if you go, you can see them there at 5:45 PM on Saturday.

Meanwhile, I am looking forward to listening to the RiffTrax for the Daredevil flick and the first X-Men movie. And I hope there’ll be a RiffTrax treatment of Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer to help us while away the years until a movie does the Galactus trilogy right.

–Copyright 2007 Peter Sanderson

Nocturnal Admissions: DVD Review Going Under

Filed under: Columns,Nocturnal Admissions — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:26 am

nocturnalheader5.gif

With increasingly regularity S&M scenes have been working their way into mainstream movies, so it was inevitable that a whole movie would be made on the subject. Going Under isn’t the first, technically, but it is surely the most realistic.

Back in 1973 when Lindsay Anderson included a scene in O Lucky Man! which a hypocritical judge gets a beating from a dominatrix the audience laughed, but 32 years later in Mr. and Mrs. Smith, when assassin in disguise Angelina Jolie shows up for an assignation in dominatrix gear ready to turn her paying submissive into a corpse, the audience response is somewhat different, deeply appreciative and turned on. It’s OK to like ladies in leather these days, and OK to ogle a domineering woman in such a get up. The 1973 audience laughed because the idea of a masochist, especially one who paid a professional to administer a beating, was a failure and a weakling in all manner of ways, from his presumed nerdiness to his having a secret life at odds with the dignity of his social standing, such as being a judge, and in conflict with the presumed morality with which he is supposed to conduct his business – such as being a judge. Nowadays a woman in kinky fetish gear announces that she is liberated, is out of the ordinary and uncaring as to who knows it, and is sexually active and creative if not downright aggressive. The reality is probably much different. It is unlikely, for example, that a university librarian such as Jill (Heather Stephens) in Tomkats can afford to outfit her bedroom with a revolving wall hiding an expensively equipped dungeon. But in movies of this sort, the S&M encounter is roughly equated with unrestrained lust.

Going Under salon

The reality appears to be quite different, according to director Eric Werthman’s Going Under, which he is credited with co-writing with Jessica Gohlke. Werthman is a therapist, and so is his main character, Peter, played bravely by Roger Rees. Peter is married to a somewhat dowdy woman his own age, and they have a college age daughter. Peter also suffers from dyslexia, a condition he appears to hide and which plagues him because it prevents him from enjoying the prestige of publishing books. Peter is also secretly a masochist, and currently patronizes the sadomasochistic salon of Suzanne (Geno Lechner, from Schlindler’s List). Suzanne is, appropriately for the masochistic imagination, is German and has rather hard, square-ish and unsmiling features. Going Under is unusual in that it goes into quite a bit of detail about Suzanne’s background, rather than simply dwelling on Peter’s neuroses.

Like many a client of a working girl, Peter wants to see Suzanne in the “real world,” because he fancies he is in love with her. Suzanne’s background is a little bit complex however. Her mother is ill, her brother appears to have some kind of weird sexual fixation on her (there is an awkward scene out of Annie Hall when Peter accompanies Suzanne on a visit to the family manse). She is also apparently a lesbian (her Asian girlfriend breaks up with her in the course of the story), she is an aspiring artist, and, like Bree Daniels in Klute, she is trying to get out of the S&M biz, only to have her admiring ex-Madam come around to lure her back for one more high paying encounter.

Going Under team

Peter has about four dungeon encounters with Suzanne and one with someone else at a public fetish club; Suzanne has that lucrative encounter out of town. These scenes feel realistic enough, in that they are tentative, awkward, negotiated openly and silently at the same time. Suzanne’s out of town date seems the most realistic because her client is a crabby gentleman whose tastes are extremely specific (the red leather dress, not the black!). The film suggests that for Suzanne, her profession has less to do with sex and more to do with unleashing anger on malekind. Her intimate partners tend to be women and she can’t bring herself to kiss Peter on the mouth. What the movie really seems to be about is the unbearable sadness of deluding yourself into liking someone who really isn’t interested. Ultimately, for all his training, Peter doesn’t really understand Suzanne. And she can’t be bothered to try and understand him. It’s only when she is unhappy in her own troubled relationships that she seeks solace with Peter, leading him on in a strained, unpleasant, perhaps unintentional manner. It’s not the dungeon scenes that are painful in this film – it’s the hopeless chats they have sitting outside coffee houses.

Going Under was shot in guerilla fashion around New York City back around 2003, but apparently wasn’t released to the theaters until summer of 2006, when a New York Times review appears, and appeared on DVD from Blue Underground on June 26th, 2007 (Blue Underground is just one of about three DVD distributors starting to dive into various levels of S&M fare). It’s realistically but well-shot by Vladimir Subotic, who doesn’t bother to glamorize anything in the film, from Rees’s bony buttocks to the waiting room of the S&M parlor. The acting is good all around and the script exudes realism. As is typical with BL, the disc is packed with supplements. The main extra is an audio commentary track by Werthman and Rees. Both sing chorus like praises for Lechner’s Potente-style beauty, but Rees isn’t particularly clear about why he wanted to do the movie in the first place. Rees’s chat is mostly about motivation and how he felt doing various things, while Werthman specializes in discussing the psychological background. His remarks are supplemented by a essay attached to the disc in an eight-page Word document, “Reflections on Going Under” by Marta Helliesen, Ph.D. “As the film ends there are again polarities, this time represented by Peter being unfinished while Suzanne is finished. Within the unfinished is the implicit need to seek completion, which for Peter might lead to repeated experience(s) as a paying submissive with one or several new dominatrixes. By standing up for herself and telling Peter to go, Suzanne experienced a clear sense of self. She is feeling the loss of Peter and of the idea of them as a unit, but she is also feeling a sense of freedom. Instead of repeating her old patterns she has reached a place where she is ready to explore new avenues that can support her continued process of developing a reliable sense of self.”

Going Under cover

Rees goes into more detail about his interest in the film during a new video interview with him and Miss Lechner; both are engaging and enthusiastic about the project. There is also a very short feature about the New York City Black and Blue Ball, which needs to be watched with the pause button in hand if you want to see anything, and a selection of BL trailers. Going Under retails for $29.95.

Quick Stop Thingamabobs: 7/16/2007

Filed under: Columns,Thingamabobs — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:01 am

thingamabobs.jpg

The web. It’s a big place, full of plenty of distractions ““ some funny, some informative, some ludicrous, some disturbing, some inane, some profound. Each and every weekday, we present links to a few of our favorite finds”¦

————————————————

  • Dancers that appear and disappear?!? Impossible!!!… (Thingamabob)
  • Dean Martin gives Don Rickles the spotlight… (Thingamabob)
  • Conan the Barbarian punching a panther. ‘Nuff said… (Thingamabob)
  • Or maybe you just want to see Devil Dinosaur kick some ass… (Thingamabob)

Have a THINGAMABOB? Send it in!

##

July 15, 2007

SModcast 20

Filed under: SModcast — UncaScroogeMcD @ 11:10 pm

newhead2.jpg

SModcast is the meandering palaver of a pair of dudes whose voices are so dull, they don’t deserve to be on the radio (and, hence, aren’t). Kevin Smith and Scott Mosier are SModcast.

The best thing about SModcast? It don’t cost nothing.

line.gif

SModcast 20: Here Comes the Bride –

In which the sausage party is crashed by a sausage patty, the feminine touch is heavily felt throughout, a de facto marriage counseling session ensues, uncomfortable sexual revelations are made, and made, and made some more.

[CONTENT WARNING] SModcast features harsh language and even harsher notions of propriety. Listener discretion is advised.

DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
SModcast 20 (MP3 format) – 35.69 MB

[display_podcast]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes
Subscribe to this Podcast via FeedBurner

Wanna add your two cents? Spend it here, in the SModcast mailbag.

line.gif

CLICK HERE FOR THE SMODCAST ARCHIVES

line.gif

##

July 13, 2007

Ken P. D. Snyde-Cast #29: Just To Get A Rise

Filed under: Ken P.D. Snydecast — UncaScroogeMcD @ 3:33 am

snydecast-header.png

snydecast-logo2.png

Adult Swim’s Dana Snyder and FRED’s Ken Plume set out to have a literate conversation between two pals, but inevitably devolve into a verbal, and funny, free-for-all full of bickering, infighting, and the special kind of male bonding that comes from conflict expressed through the podcast medium.

Actor/comedian/raconteur Dana Snyder, you’re certainly aware, is Aqua Teen Hunger Force’s Master Shake, Squidbillies‘ Granny, Minoriteam’s Dr. Wang, and The Venture Bros.‘ Alchemist. Available for weddings and bar mitzvahs (bat availability pending), you can keep tabs on him via his website, www.eyeofthesnyder.com.

Ken Plume is the editor-in-chief here at FRED. He is a friend of Dana’s, as well as his arch-nemesis.

VISIT THE SNYDECAST EXPERIENCE

linesm.gif

KEN P.D. SNYDECAST #29: Just To Get A Rise – [adult swim]’s Dana Snyder and Ken Plume’s weekly chat podcast returns, as Dana & Ken attempt to entertain their one fan, discuss Ken’s robot purchase, talk Big Apple college years, make Wikipedia pleas, and much more…

[CONTENT WARNING]: This podcast may contain some foul language and horribly off-color jokes. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
Episode #29 (MP3 format)

[audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/snydecast/ken_p_d_snyde_cast-29.mp3]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

Got something to say? E-mail Dana & Ken at the Snydecast mailbag.

line.gif

CLICK HERE FOR THE SNYDECAST ARCHIVES

line.gif

##

Weekend Shopping Guide 7/13/07: Film Crew Cometh

Filed under: Shopping Guides — UncaScroogeMcD @ 2:49 am

weekendshopping.jpg

The weekend’s here. You’ve just been paid, and it’s burning a hole in your pocket. What’s a pop culture geek to do? In hopes of steering you in the right direction to blow some of that hard-earned cash, it’s time for the Quick Stop Weekend Shopping Guide – your spotlight on the things you didn’t even know you wanted…

If you’ve been missing Mystery Science Theater 3000 and need more of MST3K-alums Mike Nelson, Kevin Murphy, and Bill Corbett, then you’re going to be giddy about their latest venture – The Film Crew. As three working schlubs tasked with providing audio commentaries for every obscure, not-terribly-good flick, you’ve essentially got, for all intents and purposes (and due to various issues), the closest thing to new MST that you’ll be able to lay your grubby little mitts on (heck, there are even host segments!… bust sadly, no ‘bots). The first film getting the Film Crew treatment is Hollywood After Dark (Shout! Factory, Not Rated, DVD-$19.99 SRP), a horrid, stagnant little gem from 1968 that features – I kid you not – a stripping Rue McClanahan. The only thing that makes it all tolerable is the on-target riffing from Mike, Kevin & Bill, who are still in the groove after all these years. Three more Film Crew discs are on track for release this year, and if you haven’t checked out Mike’s *other* venture, RiffTrax, you should head over there now.

blankguide.gif

It wasn’t until about halfway through the first season that Ricky Gervais and Stephen Merchant’s sophomore effort, Extras (HBO, Not Rated, DVD-$29.98 SRP), finally clicked for me. Since then, I’ve enjoyed his look at working actor Andy Millman and his best friend and fellow “extra”, Maggie (Ashley Jensen) – not to mention his loveably useless agent, Darren Lamb (Merchant). The second season kicks things up a notch by making Andy a commercial success as the creator and star of a hit BBC series… But one that he completely sells his creative soul for, in a Bizarro-version of the events and process that gave the world The Office. The 2-disc set features all 6 episodes, plus a behind-the-scenes documentary, a featurette on Gervais’s abuse of his poor editor, a look at “corpsing”, deleted scenes, and outtakes.

blankguide.gif

While I definitely less than enthused by what’s currently passing as comic book storytelling today, we are in a wonderful period of wonderful, overdue releases of classic material in high-quality form. The first of four hardcover volumes of Jack Kirby’s Fourth World Omnibus (DC Comics, $49.99 SRP) – collecting, in chronological order, The King’s classic world-building in Superman’s Pal, Jimmy Olsen, Mister Miracle, New Gods, and Forever People – certainly fits the bill, and it’s definitely a must-have addition to any comics fan’s library.

blankguide.gif

One of the delights of the Harry Potter series, as we usher in the latest installment, has been to see the troupe of young actors find their sea legs as thespians, and branch out into non-wizarding projects. I’ve long predicted that Rupert Grint would be the Potter actor most likely to develop into a long-term, and interesting, career, and Driving Lessons (Sony, Rated PG-13, DVD-$24.96 SRP) is certainly a step in that direction. Grint stars as 17-year-old Ben, a shy teenager chafing under an oppressively conservative home life personified by his high-strung mother (Laura Linney). When he’s employed by a former actress naked Evie (Julie Walters), the family gets its Harold & Maude on (sans the whole love angle) as the eccentric and invigorating Evie shows Ben that there is a brighter, happier, more interesting future in store if he becomes his own man. Bonus features include a making-of featurette, deleted scenes, and outtakes.

blankguide.gif

It is without a trace of hyberbole that I praise the beauty – in both visuals and storytelling – that is Jeff Smith’s comic book epic Bone. Massive in scale but intimate in character, the adventures of the Bone cousins – Fone, Phoney, and Smiley – in a mysterious valley soon under the sway of war, besieged by Rat Creatures and the machinations of an ancient evil, The Lord Of The Locusts. Originally self-published by in black & white by Smith’s own company, Cartoon Books, Scholastic has been re-releasing the 9-volume saga with beautiful coloring by Steve Hamaker. The latest release is Volume 6, Old Man’s Cave (Graphix, Hardcover-$19.99 SRP, Softcover-$9.99 SRP), and the action is hot and heavy as we barrel towards the final chapters. If you’ve never read Bone, snap these up as soon as possible. If you’re an old fan, these additions are well worth picking up.

blankguide.gif

For all the fun of the fifth season of Bewitched (Sony, Not Rated, DVD-$39.95 SRP), it’s also a bittersweet batch of episodes, as it marks the final season featuring Dick York as Samantha’s put-upon husband Darrin. The 30 episodes also features guests like Jonathan Harris, Henry Gibson, Danny Bonaduce, and Isabel Sanford.

blankguide.gif

Second only to endless documentaries about the Nazis and WWII, one of the most addictive shows to hit the History Channel has been the how-to/how-does explorations of Modern Marvels. Criminally absent from DVD shelves for years, that oversight has been rectified with another 8-disc Modern Marvels: Architectural Wonders box set (History Channel, Not Rated, DVD-$39.95 SRP). The set features all you could ever want to know about the pyramids, the Hoover Dam, the Empire State Building, the Eiffel Tower, the Golden Gate Bridge, the Great Wall of China, Mount Rushmore, and the St. Louis Arch.

blankguide.gif

The Astronaut Farmer (Warner Bros., Rated PG, DVD-$27.95 SRP) is one of those quirky little flicks that come down the pike every so often, that are just charming enough to skirt by and avoid any real harsh criticism. Such is the case here, about a man (Billy Bob Thornton) who decides to build himself a rocket into space – in his back yard. Think of it as the astronaut version of Field of Dreams, and you’ve pretty much got the idea. Bonus materials include a behind-the-scenes featurette, a conversation with NASA astronaut David Scott, and bloopers.

blankguide.gif

HBO’s late night revelations returns to its roots in Taxicab Confessions: New York, New York (HBO, Not Rated, DVD-$14.98 SRP), taking to the streets of the Big Apple for more awkward moments than you can shake a stick at.

blankguide.gif

It whipped John McClane’s ass last week, and now you can own the soundtrack to Die Hard killer – and latest Pixar flick – Ratatouille (Walt Disney Records, $18.98 SRP), by composer Michael Giacchino. It’s bright, it’s peppy, and it’s a fun spin.

blankguide.gif

Say goodbye to Crockett & Tubbs with the fifth and final season of Miami Vice (Universal, Not Rated, DVD-$59.98 SRP), a show nobody thought would ever get released with all the original music intact, but dammit if they didn’t find a way to do it. Pay your last respects with these last 21 episodes, featuring guest stars John Leguizamo, Pam Grier, Michael Chiklis, and Rita Moreno (of course, only Moreno and Grier had any real career at the time).

blankguide.gif

For far too long, we’ve been taunted by the glaring lack of complete seasons of The Powerpuff Girls. No more! Now, you too can hold tightly your very own copy of The Powerpuff Girls: Season 1 (Warner Bros., Not Rated, DVD-$26.98 SRP), featuring all 13 episodes, plus animatics, promos, Craig McCracken’s original student film, and more! Get this! Now!

blankguide.gif

Add Joan Collins to the list of stars with their own themed sets, as the 5-film Joan Collins Collection (Fox, Not Rated, DVD-$49.98 SRP) hits shelves with a career-spanning gathering of the catty siren’s big screen outings. Included in the set are The Girl In The Red Velvet Swing, Rally ‘Round The Flag, Boys!, Sea Wife, Seven Thieves, and Stopover Tokyo. Bonus features include audio commentaries, galleries, trailers, restoration featurettes, vintage pressbooks, and more.

blankguide.gif

Filmation’s ersatz (and original) Ghostbusters returns with a second volume (BCI, Not Rated, DVD-$39.98 SRP) featuring the final 33 episodes of the ‘busters battle against the ghoulish Prime Evil, plus interviews, an audio commentary, rare footage, image galleries, and more.

blankguide.gif

Wrap up the final episodes of the Black Sheep Squadron’s first season with the second volume of Baa Baa Black Sheep (Universal, Not Rated, DVD-$39.98 SRP), starring Robert Conrad as ace pilot Major Gregory “Pappy” Boyington, leader of the misfit squad of pilots tasked with some of the most difficult aerial combat missions of WWII.

blankguide.gif

As insultingly awful as the second Fantastic Four film was, one of the only bright spots of Rise of the Silver Surfer was John Ottman’s score (Sony Classical, $18.98 SRP). It certainly deserved to be attached to a better movie.

blankguide.gif

It may not be Disney’s tale as old as time, but the small screen love affair of Vincent and Catherine is a much more beloved cult version of Beauty and the Beast (Paramount, Not Rated, DVD-$50.99 SRP). The 6-disc second season features all 22 episodes, plus video introductions on select episodes by Linda Hamilton and Ron Perlman.

blankguide.gif

And finally, we wrap this week with one of those gloriously geeky collectibles that come down the pike just to appeal to the geekiest of the geeks. This time, that barometer of geekdom is Gentle Giant’s limited edition statue of the mechanical owl Bubo from Ray Harryhausen’s Clash of the Titans ($60.00 SRP). With a metallic finish, beautiful sculpting, and standing approx. 5″ tall perched on a branch affixed to a wooden base, it’s a must have delight for fans of Harryhausen’s stop-motion swan song. With an edition size of only 500 pieces, you’d better act fast!

weekendpicks20070713-18.jpg

weekendpicks20070713-19.jpg

weekendpicks20070713-20.jpg

So there you have it… my humble suggestions for what to watch, listen to, play with, or waste money on this coming weekend. See ya next week…

-Ken Plume

##

Trailer Park: Adam De La Pena

Filed under: Columns,Interviews,Trailer Park — admin @ 12:03 am

By Christopher Stipp

Archives? Right Here…

I wasted a lot of my life playing video games.

I can tell you the simple joys of beating Castlevania or Metroid or the OG version of Mike Tyson’s Punch-Out and seeing the scroll of names, the designers and producers of the game itself, who I could thank for taking up every ounce of fresh free time I had. There is something rather strange about the time warp one goes through when you look at your watch after getting blasted, again, trying to make it past a level only to see hours evaporated like acetone.

I never thought what it must have been like for the men and women who were behind the keyboard, cranking out the 1’s and 0’s that made up engrossing hours of entertainment. Some of the people who were great went on to create corporations and empires based on the adolescent need to escape while some of the others who were, well, not so great would wind up driving their Ford into the side of their employer’s building in retaliation for them not recognizing their genius. More on that later.

Adam De La Pena, the man and myth behind Minoriteam and the whipping post of every whim that Gary Busey had in I’m With Busey, is back with Code Monkeys, an 8-bit show dedicated to sending up the lives of programmers and the things they have to endure at the hands of ignorant management while forging the path that so many would follow after the 80’s introduced home video gaming to young men everywhere.

Adam was nice enough to take some time out of his hectic schedule, in between his brief stints in taking bets on Super Mario Brothers (more on that, as well, later), to explain how he got Steve Wozniak to add his voice to the program and whether programmers operate on a beta level different from the rest of us.

CHRISTOPHER STIPP: So…Why the hell do I have to see the commercial every time some program on G4 goes to break? Is the show going to take over the network?

ADAM DE LA PENA: I’ll tell you why the commercial is on all the time…It’s the only damn show on that network.

[Laughs]

Like”¦they don’t tell you anything when you’re doing television. It’s, “Hey, how many times is the show going to run?”

The show is going to be running like 20 times! I think at point even I’m going to fucking hate it. But, really, they’re going to run the crap out of it. But at least there’s 13 of them and it’s not like it’s a 6 episode order. And the first episode”¦Did they send you a screener or anything like that?

STIPP: No, no. This was kind of a last minute interview but I did make my way to the G4 site and then to Break.com where I was able to see the offered clips.

DE LA PENA: Oh yeah, Break. The classiest site on the web?

STIPP: Yeah, where you can see clips of Code Monkeys and then catch the brutality of some idiot kid on a skateboard landing on their face after some failed jump.

DE LA PENA: Break”¦I was first like, “Uh”¦what’s this site?” And then I go on to learn that around 200,000 people have seen the whole thing. I was kind of shocked by that.

STIPP: Wow.

DE LA PENA: Yeah, it’s pretty high for people who’ve sat and watched the whole thing.

STIPP: I did and I honestly thought it was really amusing. It’s kinetic but funny at the same time which I thing fits well with the ADD addled youth this program is aimed at.

DE LA PENA: My biggest victory is that Neil Diamond is a character. My biggest victory. That and I’m able to tell the story of two guys, Dave and Jerry, where I play Dave. These guys work at a game company and they’re perfectly comfortable there, they like it, and then the company gets sold to a crazy Texas guy, Larry, who is based on this guy in the early days of the video game industry that didn’t know a thing about video games but then he goes on to own this code factory, his son told him to invest money in it, and it suddenly becomes Atari or ColecoVision.

STIPP: And the episodes have a distinctive look to them; It’s not unlike video games that a lot of us Gen Xers grew up playing”¦

DE LA PENA: Yes”¦ It’s a mixture of Photoshop After Effects and Final Cut. I wanted to do something without interference from anybody so I kind of did it by myself with my friends. We did it and we were going to just throw it up on the Web”¦and we had a 7 minute piece of animation that we were happy with and we showed it around. A bunch of people were actually interested in it but G4 made the best offer of like, “Look, we’re not the biggest network but your show will actually find a home here.” And that was the most important thing to me so we said, “Yeah, give us some money and we’ll do a bunch of episodes.”

The thing is, they gave us money for a pilot, a half-hour pilot, and they were really cool about it. Essentially they made it clear like, “Just don’t screw up the pilot and it’s pretty much a forgone conclusion we’ll pick up the show.” So, the pilot, which is not really the first episode, because they can’t air the pilot because it would get a TV-14, which is something they can’t air on their network, we just went, “Fine, we’ll do another pilot.” I’m sure it’ll end up on the DVD or on the Internet.

I think they had a problem with a scene where this monkey skull humps this girl”¦[I laugh]

Yeah, a lot of horrible things happen in these episodes. But the pilot that does air has Steve Wozniak in it.

STIPP: That must have been a big coup”¦How did you land him of all people?

DE LA PENA: Here’s how I landed it: G4 gave us this list of all these people of we know, tech people, who would want to do the show. I was kind of like, “Yeah, ok, alright. But what about Steve Wozniak?” And they said, “Oh, we don’t know about him. He’s the founder of Apple”¦” Whatever. I literally found his number through some crazy chain on the Internet.

STIPP: You’re kidding.

DE LA PENA: I called it”¦And he answers the phone. Coolest guy in the world. Like no bullshit guy in the world, says he’d do it, and it was like the easiest thing to set up. We basically went to the Sunnyvale area, booked the recording studio, and the whole time I’m thinking, “He’s not going to show up.” He shows up, couldn’t be nicer, does an interview, does everything we ask for, says it’s one of the best things he’s ever done, being animated”¦He said, “It’s like when they asked me to program for Atari.” I was like, “What?!” “Yeah,” he said, “Like when I was making Pong”¦” And luckily I got this all on tape so no one can call “Bullshit” on me.

It’s awesome because Steve is playing himself but, in the show, he wants to concentrate on Apple but Dave is convinced that computers are a passing fad, like MTV”¦And that Dave thinks Wozniak lacks vision.

STIPP: What made you want to render the show’s visual appeal to that 80’s era, Atari/Intellivision style?

DE LA PENA: Well, I spent the vast majority of my childhood, like I’m sure many of those same people who visit your site, watching TV”¦and a lot of people talk about the influences of TV and movies but I also spent a lot of time playing video games when I wasn’t directly watching TV. And I’ve only done 2 animated shows but I’ve always known that you’ve got to have a reason for how it looks, not the other way around. When you do an animated script you’ve to ask, “Why does this have to be animated?” But the reason for me why it was going to be in the style that it’s in is that the games that these guys make are reflective of the way the show progresses. It has a really strong look. For example, when I was doing Minoriteam it had this very strong, Jack Kirby influenced, limited animation style. And even Adult Swim, who was notorious for giving everyone their space was like, “Are you sure want to animate it this way?” The answer was, “Of course! We don’t want it to be Superfriends. This is it.” We stuck to it, we stuck to that animation style and I’m really happy we did because it gave the show the look that it did.

STIPP: It was distinctive! Not to bag on Cartoon Network but after a certain hour of the night you could easily see how a lot of their various Japanimation incarnations could all run together and you wouldn’t even know what’s what.

DE LA PENA: Yeah, and one of the things is that, on paper, if you just read it you would be like, “It’s crazy, I guess, but how is this different from any other office comedy?” And I think once the show comes out you’ll be able to see how the story ideas are really influenced by video games and pop culture more so than the standard sitcom crap that’s on TV.

STIPP: And this show transpires in the 80’s? Are you going to be breaking out all the culture from back then or are you planning on incorporating modern”¦

DE LA PENA: It takes place in the 80’s but it was really important to not be like really overt with it. For example, E.T. That was a huge moment but that game sucked and people were pissed that it sucked and developers made a lot of these kinds of games. It’s incorporating these kinds of things with original ideas like one of the running themes in the show is that Larry fires people who will become the best game programmers, designers, in the world. Like he fires Dave Jaffe, the God of War designer, when he’s a little kid. Dave Jaffe does his voice and says, “Larry, I have this great idea for a game called God of War.” And Larry says “I don’t need no war games” and literally kicks him in the head. So Larry goes on to fire some of the best designers in the world; Nolan Bushnell from Atari, Steve Wozniak, all of them, so that’s one of the running gags. But, also, we’re taking modern video games and putting them in an 80’s context. Like we’ve got the guys from Red vs. Blue and they’re in our prison episode, they play prison guards.

STIPP: How did you sell the people on doing the show? Was it hard for them to go along with the idea?

DE LA PENA: Not really. I hate going through agents or managers so I’ll try and call them up. Like, I called Nolan Bushnell’s number and talked to him and he was totally cool. Setting up the time was the only hard thing. Dave Jaffe couldn’t have been nicer. Dave literally said, “Oh, I think I have time on Saturday”¦I don’t know if I can do it Saturday”¦” The last e-mail he sent me was, “I think I’ll be in town on Saturday.” I was just working on Saturday with my friend and he just shows up and says, “Want to record now?” Uh, yeah, great, thanks for coming”¦Steve Wozniak was relatively easy, the Red Vs. Blue guys”¦they’ve been great. I mean, we’re going to have a lot of other guest stars but those are the real guest stars for us. We’re more about going after the video game designers than we are going after Molly Ringwald.

STIPP: Since you’ve spent so much time surrounded by it, and since you’re probably like me with the way you grew up in the midst of all the evolution in video games, is there any one thing designers or programmers say about what’s changed for them as things have become more complex?

DE LA PENA: Well, I’ve talked to a bunch of designers and they say, “Yeah, we really like the show because, back then, it really was one guy designing a game.” A lot of the guys who came through that are now managers of people who make these games. It used to be 1 or 2 guys putting out a Pitfall or a Castlevania.

So, we have talked to designers who are still in the business that used to be around back in the day. And there’s this one guy who told us a great story that we’re using in the show”¦There was this one designer who was developing this one engine for game. He kept designing and kept designing, working all by himself for like months on end. They kept asking, “When’s it going to be done? When’s it going to be done?” “Ah! It’ll be done when it’s done!” he said. He was really cranky kind of guy. But they couldn’t wait! So, they bought an engine from another company, shipped the game, and never told him. He came out one day and was like, “What’s going on? I’m done with it.” And they said, “Well, we already shipped it.”

The guy lost his mind.

He ran out of the company, literally, and those who were there said all they saw was his tiny little Ford car running into the side of the building. But he kept working there later on. He was just a crazy guy and they put up with it.

STIPP: Are programmers just a different breed of people?

DE LA PENA: I don’t think they’re so different. I come from a directing and writing background and I can relate to locking myself in a room to work.

Like, in Code Monkeys, we have lots of different types of programmers. There’s Todd who does nothing but Quest games; he has a horn helmet and works alone and he’s designed his room like a lair and he’s all about the future of video games. There’s Dave, who’s really the best programmer but who spends his time putting turds in microwaves and blowing them up. There’s Jerry who is always worried about the ship date, the video game industry is all about ship dates. I was told this one story about a bunch of game designers who went to Japan, they were all working like crazy to meet the ship date and once they did they all got hammered and drunk and crazy. Obliterated for like 2 days and then went back to work on the next game. It’s just like any other industry”¦crazy pressure.

STIPP: Is there any loyalty to particular companies”¦

DE LA PENA: What happened, and it’s really interesting, the companies that started out small and would eventually become the players like EA”¦the game designers wanted their names on the boxes like Steven Spielberg. They thought their work was that important and they were right. They did this and they were a one man show. They started wanting more and more and eventually realized they could go and start their own companies. So, I think what happened was that early video game companies didn’t treat them very well.

STIPP: Did any of these guys point to any one thing that changed the industry on the whole?

DE LA PENA: I would have to say that it would probably be the Atari system because it was the first mass distributed home system that everyone had to have. Before then, these guys were designing games for upright cabinets that kids were putting quarters in. Atari opened”¦made it possible for a lot of these guys to work on games in general”¦different types of games, different titles. After that it would probably be the NES. Things took a big leap.

There were also things that were huge but just didn’t sell well for whatever reason. Like, the Sega had the Dreamcast system”¦Everything was incredible on the system but it just didn’t do well. The games, everything. It was just one of those things.

So, I think that’s the kind of thing they would say, when games came into the home. Now I think it’s the ability to be connected with other game players. That’s huge.

STIPP: Yeah. I think I’ve missed the boat on that because I haven’t really had the urge to be connected with kids from Guam.

[Laughs]

DE LA PENA: And you’re yelling at some kid in Puerto Rico you just beat the shit out of in Halo. The Internet is all about community but there’s these game clans that exist within games like Halo…really serious gamers.

STIPP: Some of these people take these things way too seriously.

DE LA PENA: Oh yeah. My friend literally has to, when he works, when he’s on a television show, or if he’s designing, he literally has to take his X-Box or whatever system he’s using”¦put the system in a box, tape the box up and send it to somebody’s house so he doesn’t use it.

STIPP: Seriously?

DE LA PENA: Because he would be consumed with it. One time we’re working and someone brought one in, like a GameCube or something, and he said, “What the fuck is that? Get it out of here! I can’t have it in the office!”

STIPP: Do you still play?

DE LA PENA: I do. Have I played in the last couple of months? No. But what we have been playing is a lot of the old games. I’ve always had an older system but now we’re really getting into the old NES games: Castlevania, Super Mario Brothers. Now we’re taking things a step further and now we’re playing for things like fastest time on the 1st level with the flag. We’re betting money and paychecks, which is getting sad. But it’s keeping everybody sane here so it’s good.

QSE News: 7/13/2007

Filed under: Columns,News — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:02 am

quickstopnews.jpg

line1.gif

Here are today’s top entertainment headlines:

  • qsnews.jpgA theater in New York is offering free tickets to the new off-Broadway show “My First Time” to virgins.  In order to prove whether or not the people are really virgins, the producers have hired Sebastian Black, a mind reader and hypnotist who bills himself as “The Human Lie Detector.”  In related news, the staff at QSE News will be out next week, seeing a new show in New York.
  • The fifth movie in the Harry Potter franchise, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, earned the biggest Wednesday opening ever after it took in nearly $45 million.  The movie, which continues to follow the young wizard and his classmates, beat the previous record holder, Spider-Man 2, by over 4 million.  While it has been successful in the first few days, insiders are counting on a sharp drop in profits this weekend as NBC rolls out new episodes of “To Catch a Predator.”
  • Sam Rockwell and Anjelica Huston have been cast in the movie Choke, based on the novel by Chuck Palahniuk.  The movie centers around a sex addict who pretends to choke then sponges off of the people who save him.  While the movie hasn’t even started filming yet, the marketing department is already hard at work trying to convince people that the movie is not a film biography of legendary porn star Ron Jeremy.

line1.gif

That’s all for today’s news, stay tuned to this channel for all the news that matters least but you still care about.

(Compiled by J. Allen)

##

Quick Stop Thingamabobs: 7/13/2007

Filed under: Columns,Thingamabobs — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:01 am

thingamabobs.jpg

The web. It’s a big place, full of plenty of distractions ““ some funny, some informative, some ludicrous, some disturbing, some inane, some profound. Each and every weekday, we present links to a few of our favorite finds”¦

————————————————

  • The Jolly Green Giant will kill you in your sleep… (Thingamabob)
  • So visit with the mellow, good time Colonel instead… (Thingamabob)

Have a THINGAMABOB? Send it in!

##

July 12, 2007

Party Favors: Frank Vincent

Filed under: Columns,Interviews,Joe Corey's Party Favors — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:59 am

partyfavors1.jpg

vincent2007-07-12-01.jpgJERSEY CITY, NJ – After watching A Tale of Two Pizzas, I picked up the phone. In less than thirty minutes, star Frank Vincent delivered an interview to the “Party Favors”. The movie features Frank Vincent and Vincent Pastore as rival pizza parlor owners. Normally a film featuring two Sopranos veterans should climax with their enemies being turned into special sausage toppings. But amazingly enough, this is a date movie. No limbs are hacked off. There’s barely a beatdown.

Frank Vincent laughed when asked if this is one of those rare movies in his filmography that a woman can enjoy without having to hide her eyes to avoid the bloodshed.

“It’s a nice little escape from some of the insanity that they put in the movies these days,” Frank said. “The most violent thing was the fight with the paddles.” If your date can handle Frank and Pastore swatting each other with pizza paddles, you won’t have to worry about her squirming under the seat.

Frank has found himself becoming a bit of a sex symbol thanks to his role on The Sopranos. “Let me tell you something, Joe,” Frank said. “Phil Leotardo has got more women fans than anybody. I don’t understand it, but the women love Phil. Phil is a bad guy. But every woman I met says they love him. I say, ‘Why?’ They say, ‘Cause he’s bad and sexy.'”

But ladies, don’t think you can call up Frank Vincent and sweep him away for a romantic evening in Manhattan at Scott Sartiano’s Butter. He already has a date. “I go out with my wife,” the bad boy confessed.

You might spot Frank Vincent dining out with his wonderful wife. Feel free to give him a polite wave, but don’t be a pest. He’s not going to put up with it.

“If I go out socially with my wife someplace and I’m with people for dinner. somebody will come and say, ‘Can I take a picture with you?’ If I’m out socially, I don’t want to take a picture. Everyone in that room has a camera in their pocket (especially with most cellphones also being cameras). If I take a picture with you and somebody else asks me, and I deny them, then I’m not doing myself a service. If I take one. I got to take them all. If I’m out socially, I’d rather refuse than say yes and stand there for an hour and a half taking pictures. That’s not what I came out to do. I’m not working. If I go to a place that I’m there to sign autographs or whatever, then we take pictures. People don’t realize, but that’s what happens.”

He sounded pretty happy that he isn’t being hounded by the camera hordes that follow fellow sexy actor Brad Pitt. “I don’t have to worry about that level yet. I don’t know if I ever will get to that level. But I don’t particularly care to get to that level.”

For decades, Frank Vincent has been to crime movies what Strother Martin was to the western. Fans of the genre would spot him on the screen like a Where’s Waldo moment. He made his first major splash as a mobster in Raging Bull. He nabbed a quotable role in Goodfellas when, as Billy Bats, he said, “Hey, Tommy, if I was gonna break your balls, I’d tell you to go home and get your shine box.” He became part of Joe Pesci’s crew that terrorized Las Vegas in Casino. But when he assumed the role of hardcore mob boss Phil Leotardo on The Sopranos, Frank became a guest in America’s living room.

“It elevated my visibility a lot. I had some visibility with Raging Bull, Casino, Goodfellas and Spike Lee movies. But you can’t compare film visibility with television visibility,” Frank said. “Fifteen million would watch one episode. A movie couldn’t do that in 10 years.”

In a few weeks, Frank Vincent went from a cult star to a cultural icon. “People know my name now. Wherever I go. They know it’s Phil. They know it’s Frank Vincent. It’s raised my level of visibility a lot.”

vincent2007-07-12-02.jpgThe benefits of this visibility can be immediately seen in A Tale of Two Pizzas finally getting a DVD release after playing festivals a few years ago. For the longest time Frank Vincent made a living as a drummer, but has he ever worked in the world of slices and parmesan?

“No. I have not ever worked in pizza place,” Frank declared. “I was in the pizza place for two weeks making this movie.”

In the film, Frank’s character is trying to come up with a crust that matches his great sauce. He didn’t actually have to learn how to make pizzas to perfect the role of Frank Bianco, the pizzeria proprietor. “We weren’t making them from scratch. The pizza parlor owner was there. He would kneed the dough, lay it out and put it in the oven. During the shot, I had to take it out. I wasn’t actually making pizza dough.”

Did Director Vincent Sassone have him try to toss the pizza dough in the air and catch it like a scene from I Love Lucy?

“No. None of that stuff,” Frank said. “It would mess up my hair.”

A Tale of Two Pizzas has Pastore’s daughter (Robin Paul) and Frank’s son (Conor Dubin) having a Romeo and Juliet relationship. The fathers don’t completely disapprove since they expect their offspring to steal the trade secrets of their rival. While the movie now features two Sopranos legends, at the time of the shooting, only Pastore had the show on his résumé.

“He was in and out already,” Frank said. “I hadn’t gone in yet.”

Did Frank ever accidentally call Pastore by his old Sopranos name? Are there outtakes of him saying Big Pussy?

“No.” Frank said. “You call them by their real names sometimes when we’re shooting. If I’m doing a scene with Tony and I call him by his name, I might say, “Jim.” And they say, ‘Cut. It’s Tony; not Jim.’ When you’re friendly with people, occasionally that’s what happens.”

I proposed the idea that Tony Danza only plays characters named Tony so that his fellow actors don’t have that confusion on the set. Frank laughed. “Tony Danza is a good man,” he said.

While most of the people Frank Vincent went to High School with are pondering how to enjoy retirement, he’s going into career overdrive. “I’m busy. I’m busy. I have a couple of films that I’m waiting to hear about. I have my own cigars that just came out: The Frank Vincent Signature Series. They’re from the Dominican Republic. I sell my t-shirts on my website: Frankvincent.com. I sell Billy Bats “Go Home and Get Your Shinebox” t-shirts. We sell mugs, Phil Leotardo t-shirts and mousepads. We sell them all over the world. They buy them in Australia and Scotland. I’m a spokesman for a bank in Dublin, Ireland.”

Turns out the bank in Ireland uses him to promote their electronic services. Many characters played by Frank Vincent know how painful it can be when you’re late on a payment.

There had been a rumor that on the set of Nothing to Lose, Frank would occasionally juice newbie director Eric Bross by whispering, “That’s exactly what Marty would do” after a take. When confronted with this story, Frank Vincent admitted to doing this. “I would tease him,” Frank said.

Vincent still has a scene with a pre-Oscar Adrien Brody on his reel. But he rarely sends that tape out to casting agents. “I’m offer only. If you want to hire me, call my manager. Tell him what you want. Send the script. If we like the script, then make an offer,” Frank said.

Frank has a done voice work on the successful Grand Theft Auto video games. I asked if he’s ever done any voice over gigs in his pajamas.

“No. Why would I do that?” Frank asked. During every interview with a major star doing an animation voice, they talk about how they like the gig cause they could show up in their pajamas. “No. I do not wear pajamas in public like Vincent Gigante,” Frank said. Gigante was the mob boss who faked being nuts by wandering around Manhattan in his PJs.

Speaking of mobsters in pajamas, Frank almost had to wear pajamas for work.

“I was up for the pilot of The Sopranos. I didn’t get it because David didn’t want me in the show at that point because Billy Bats was too popular.” He almost became Tony’s uncle.

“We all read for the Uncle Junior role. I read it, Tony Sirico read it. And Dominic (Chianese) read it. Chase created the Paulie Walnuts role (for Tony) after it. A lot of times when you read, you don’t read for the role they want you for. You read a generic role. Directors just want to meet you and see what kind of style you have. David created Phil after the third or fourth season. He brought me in and said, ‘I want to find something for you.’ I said, ‘Whenever you’re ready, I’m ready.’ He called me in for season five for a recurring role. They bought me for three episodes. They just kept buying me and buying me. We did 12. The next season I was a regular. He had it planned all the while.”

The subject turns to how Phil proved to be Tony’s toughest rival on the series.

“You had Johnny Sack there before. Vincent Curatola did a nice role. He was respectable and believable in his character. Phil had a little more of an edge than Johnny,” Frank said. The other mobsters went weepy as they showed their human side. Phil might have backed down, but he never broke down. “I never went soft,” Frank said.

Phil kinda went soft when he met his fate in the final episode. Unlike many supporting actors who were taken out to dinner by David Chase prior to discovering their sad demise, Frank didn’t get a dinner with his funeral.

“That was the usual way,” Frank said. But instead he had to discover he’d be a human speed bump without an entree during the table read. “We sat down and read the script,” Frank said. Judging from the body count in the final episodes, they would have had to extend the shoot to squeeze in all the dinners.

Because he was wrapped long before the big finale, there was no need to ask Frank if he was part of any of the “other” final scenes or if the family eating at the restaurant was meant to end that way.

“You tell me what really what went on?” Frank asked. My theory is that the family sits around the table. AJ can’t get the ketchup out of the bottle. Tony grabs it and gives it couple hard slams. We see the onion rings covered in ketchup, blood and brains.

“Why do you think that?” Frank queried. My theory comes from the scene earlier in the episode with Tony forcing ketchup out of the bottle. It seemed like a moment to be replayed with gruesome results.

“You have a very vivid imagination, son,” Frank said. “Now your imagination of that and ten other people will have ten other endings. David (Chase) achieved what he wanted to achieve. He made everyone think what they wanted to think.”

In the past, Frank has acted on several Law and Order episodes. Will he be guesting on one of the CSI series in the near future? “No,” Frank said. “At this point, those shows might be out of reach for me because of the Phil character.”

Frank is in discussions about being part of a reality show. “It’s a question of what the reality show is. How the story is constructed.” He won’t allow a camera crew to live inside his house. “I don’t want none of that nonsense,” Frank said. He’s more up for the competitive reality show rather than challenge Gene Simmons and Hulk Hogan.

Bringing the conversation back to A Tale of Two Pizzas, I asked Frank what he thought of seeing himself turned into an animated character in parts of the film.

“I thought all the animation was great. I thought the music was great. They did a nice job for a little independent movie.”

QSE News: 7/12/2007

Filed under: Columns,News — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:38 am

quickstopnews.jpg

line1.gif

Here are today’s top entertainment headlines:

  • qsnews.jpgNintendo Co. Ltd. Has issued a warning to future Wii consumers ““ get it now or don’t get it at all. Nintendo issued a statement saying that come this holiday season, the Wii will be harder to find than normal due to expected increase in demand and a launch of one hundred new games. We at QSE News are going to file this in the “No Shit” department.
  • A small town in Vermont has won the honor of hosting the preimer of The Simpsons Movie. Springfield, VT, competed with 13 other Springfields across the country to host the event. Producers of The Simpsons said Vermont was chosen because “Seriously… we have to give those people something to live for. What else do they have?”
  • Daredevil Evel Knieval and rapper Kanye West are going to a mediator to settle a pending lawsuit.  In December Knieval brought suit against the hip hop star, claiming West used his trademarks in the video for the song “Touch the Sky.”  According to those close to the case, West is willing to settle even though “(West) ain’s saying (Knieval)’s a gold digga, but he ain’t messing with no broke (Rapper).”

line1.gif

That’s all for today’s news, stay tuned to this channel for all the news that matters least but you still care about.

(Compiled by J. Allen)

##

Quick Stop Thingamabobs: 7/12/2007

Filed under: Columns,Thingamabobs — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:14 am

thingamabobs.jpg

The web. It’s a big place, full of plenty of distractions ““ some funny, some informative, some ludicrous, some disturbing, some inane, some profound. Each and every weekday, we present links to a few of our favorite finds”¦

————————————————

  • Allan Sherman sings “Crazy Downtown”… (Thingamabob)
  • A virtual tour of the sets from Ratatouille… (Thingamabob)

Have a THINGAMABOB? Send it in!

##

July 11, 2007

Game On! 7-11-2007: Typing is Fun!

Filed under: Game On! — admin @ 4:06 am

gameon.jpg

How long has it been since I’ve actually REVIEWED some games, huh? Geez”¦ I’m such a lazy fucking bastard. I’ll play them sure, but writing”¦ eh”¦ podcasting is easier. Well, when I can get to EDITING the damn thing anyway. In the meantime, here’s a bunch of printed words about some games I’ve played. No, seriously.

DEATH DOESN’T BECOME YOU

Death Jr DSI was a big fan of the two previous entries in the DEATH JR series on PSP, so when I heard it was coming over to Nintendo’s handheld for a third, I was excited. Sadly, after playing through DEATH JR AND THE SCIENCE FAIR OF DOOM, I can’t say the wait was worth it.

For starters, the graphics, obviously, just aren’t up to par with what the PSP can produce. Normally, this isn’t that much of sticking point: no one expects the DS to have the same kind of graphical output. However, the game looks REALLY blocky, more so than most DS titles, and it really hurts not only the look and feel of the game, but the hit and jump detection as well. Because of the game’s need to compensate visually for the graphics with a changing camera angle (often side scrolling, but switching to slightly overhead in some scenes) you’ll find yourself falling to your doom more times than you can count on your bony fingers.

Death Jr DS screen

Also, the dynamic of switching between Pandora (in ghost form) and DJ doesn’t quite work as well as one would hope either. The first time I began the game, I didn’t realize quite how Pandora was to keep the magic orbs gained by defeating foes (but touching them with the stylus). At first, I tried dragging them to Pandora, but that only served to launch them across the screen AWAY from her”¦a feat you need to do ONCE you’ve obtained them.Still, the game has its moments. The story, while nothing fantastic by DJ standards, does have some truly funny moments, and still looks like a Tim Burton wet dream. The audio leaves a bit to be desired however, as it’s just as poor as the graphics. When it comes right down to it, this is one best left alone, in the hopes that DJ’s eventual console debut has a bit of these types of problems fixed.

One Gamer’s Opinion:

lib2_1.jpg

BOLL WII-VIL, GET RIGHT OUT OF YOUR HOME

RE 4 WiiI’m not going to delve into the story again on this, the third iteration of RESIDENT EVIL 4(now the WII EDITION”¦or would that be RESIDENT WII-VIL?) but suffice to say, this is probably the best version of the game released yet. Two years later, however, it’s also now easier to see some faults.

Wen the game debuted two years ago on the Gamecube, its graphics were some of the best we’ve seen on a home console system. While it still looks good, it’s finally starting to show it’s age. Not only that, but the fact that you can’t run and aim at the same time is REALLY more of an inconvenience than one would think. Or maybe we’ve just become to accustomed with GEARS OF WAR.

This time around, the Wii Version is a combination of both the Cube and PS2 version, featuring the graphics of the former, and the extras of the latter. Ada’s bonus missions are included, as well as a trailer for the upcoming UMBRELLA CHRONICLES. Nice additions, but it would have been even nicer if you didn’t have to beat the game (again, for many) to unlock the Ada missions.

RE 4 Wii Screen

The new Wii version features what are both the best and worst aiming systems, all at the same time. You have a bit more of precision with aiming with the Wii-mote, but sadly, your view remains boxed in to just what you can see on screen. For example, if your foe is just off camera, moving the targeting reticule to the edge of the screen doesn’t slide it over to face your foe. You must move the camera with the analog stick AND aim with the Wii-mote”¦taking a bit more precision than necessary. Still, once they are in your sights, it’s a welcome addition to aim LIGHT GUN-style.Still, at thirty dollars, it’s nice to see that you won’t be paying too much more for the newly waggle controlled version of a game that’s still available for other systems at $20. A bit more improvement would have been nice, but honestly, let’s just move on to a NEW entry in the series.

One Gamer’s Opinion:

lib2_1.jpg

FINALLY

Final fantasy PSPOk, so as it has been said before”¦I’ve never really played any of the FINAL FANTASY games before the recently released XII. Thankfully, due to the series 20th anniversary, the opportunity to go back with the series’ classic beginnings has arisen again with the release of the first FINAL FANTASY on PSP.

Strangely, however, this isn’t the first time the game has been re-released. Twice before now it was available (with the second game as well), once on PSOne, and once on GBA. Apparently, this version is the best of both of those, with the CG-I cut scenes of the PSOne version, and the slightly easier difficulty of the GBA. What this means is that you’ll get the same classically old school style sprites, simplistic turned based combat, and six character types to choose from for your four man party. What this also means, however, is that you’re also getting the same amount of fun as before.

Honestly, as many RPGs that I’ve played over the years, I think I prefer the old school sprites and side view turned based battles to the overly complicated three dimensional games of the day. There’s just something so satisfying about heading to town, picking up an adventure, heading out across the land, exploring a dungeon, fighting a boss, then heading back to town with the spoils of your adventure. Thankfully, the PSP version’s widescreen handles the graphics with a shine and clarity that makes every moment worth watching, and it’s “save anywhere” system works perfectly for the portable players.

Final fantasy PSP screen

If you’ve played the game before, you’re not going to find anything new with this adventure, save for one extra dungeon, but for those of you more familiar with the games later on in the series, it’s nice to see how far they’ve come, and how it all began. And while it’s curious that this version doesn’t include the second game as the two previous re-releases have, it will be available separately at the end of July. We’ll see how that one fairs once it’s released.

One Gamer’s Opinion:

lib2_1.jpg

CRAPTACULAR GAME OF THE WEEK

Vampire Rain boxGoodness me. I didn’t think they made games that sucked as bad as VAMPIRE RAIN anymore. Especially considering how “next gen” is supposed to mean high quality, not just in terms of graphics and control, but gameplay and story as well. It begins with some promise, with a cool little CG-i cut scene at the opening of a woman walking the streets, stalked by a bloodthirsty “nightwalker”. Once you start playing the game, however, all that potential vanishes down the drain with the rest of the rainfall. In a game that looks like SYPHON FILTER meets BLADE, it’s amazing that your tasks are so menial and bland. Wow, you can avoid being spotted by a Vampire by simply walking behind a car, rather than just past the alley it’s in? The cut scenes take the biggest drag out of the coolness factor, as the voice acting is so horribly bad that I’m not sure whether it’s the translation, the writing, or BOTH that should take the blame. The in game graphics are the worst, however. While the cinemas are nice, the gameplay looks like first gen Xbox”¦and BAD first gen Xbox at that. Shame on Microsoft for charging a full $60 this obviously budget game.

One Gamer’s Opinion:

gameon5.jpg

And that wraps up another bit of reviews. That summer blockbuster podcast I’ve been promising should be along soon”¦ work has been a bit of a bitch lately, so my time to edit has been limited. Soon though. In the meantime”¦ yeah, looks like I’ll be typing. Ah well”¦

 

THE GAME ON! RATING SYSTEM

 

gameonratingscomplete.jpg

Ratings From Greatest to Least:

Kick Ass, Right On, Okay, Eh, and Stinker (aka CRAPTACULAR)

QSE News: 7/11/2007

Filed under: Columns,News — UncaScroogeMcD @ 3:58 am

quickstopnews.jpg

line1.gif

Here are today’s top entertainment headlines:

  • qsnews.jpgCable Network TNT has purchased the broadcast rights for the movie 300 for $17 million.  The move gives TNT the rights to broadcast the movie beginning in September of 2009.  TNT is excited about the move as they have been looking to fill the homo-erotic void that was left when the station lost professional wrestling.
  • It has been announced that Kevin Spacey will be reprising his role as Lex Luthor in the upcoming sequel to Superman Returns.  While plot details have not been released, it is expected that in the film Luthor will almost kill Superman only to have the Man of Steel come back at the last minute for a victory.
  • The goth gods The Cure will be releasing a new, double album, this October. The album will be the band’s thirteenth studio release. The band will continue to release the album despite being faced with the fact that the world stopped listening after Mood Swings.

line1.gif

That’s all for today’s news, stay tuned to this channel for all the news that matters least but you still care about.

(Compiled by J. Allen)

##

July 10, 2007

SModcast 19

Filed under: SModcast — UncaScroogeMcD @ 1:05 am

newhead2.jpg

SModcast is the meandering palaver of a pair of dudes whose voices are so dull, they don’t deserve to be on the radio (and, hence, aren’t). Kevin Smith and Scott Mosier are SModcast.

The best thing about SModcast? It don’t cost nothing.

line.gif

SModcast 19: We Owe It All to Nook-Nook –

In which our heroes broadcast from a talking house, get their Trek on, briefly interrupt the proceedings to do some work, suss out why they never abused the casting couch, debate an indecent proposal, brag about oral proficiencies gone to waste, marvel over the frigid, define love, and hail the first cro-magnon sexual astronaut.

[CONTENT WARNING] SModcast features harsh language and even harsher notions of propriety. Listener discretion is advised.

DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
SModcast 19 (MP3 format) – 36.10 MB

[display_podcast]

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes
Subscribe to this Podcast via FeedBurner

Wanna add your two cents? Spend it here, in the SModcast mailbag.

line.gif

CLICK HERE FOR THE SMODCAST ARCHIVES

line.gif

##

Toy Box: A Few Words with Edward Wires

Filed under: Columns,Toy Box — admin @ 12:42 am

toybox.jpg

There are lots and lots of aspects to any one action figure that contribute to it’s overall appeal, or it’s overall unappeal. Week after week I harp on the aesthetics of the sculpt, the usefulness of the articulation, or the play value of the accessories. But the single factor that can make or break even the best work in every other category (or on the flipside, carry some pretty weak work in every other category) is the paint.

Now obviously, the figure you get is painted by a machine or person working like a machine, doing the same few strokes over and over again. They use masks and forms and templates to get straight cuts and clean lines, and the final version may have fewer paint operations than expected. That’s often because cutting the paint is the quickest way to cut the unit cost at the last minute. But at the start of all this, at the very beginning, is a hand painted pre-production figure(s) that sets the stage for what they company HOPES the final product will look like. And when they want it to look it’s very best, they call in the man we’re talking with today.

One of the finest artists in this field is Edward Wires. He has worked for just about every toy company past and present, including Hasbro, Mattel, Toybiz, Diamond Select, Palisades, DC Direct and Art Asylum. If you’ve ever marveled at a Marvel Legends prototype, then you’ve been marveling at Ed’s work. I sat down with EW to ask him a few questions:

line.gif

MWC: So Eddie, how did this all happen? Painting houses, painting cars, painting nudes – these are all things the common world understands. But how does a man end up painting toys for a living?

WIRES: I grew up as the penultimate nerd (the term “fanboy” wouldn’t exist for at least another 10 or 15 years). Reading comics, collecting action figures, watching cartoons, jumping off my deck with a towel tied around my neck, and blowing up Star Wars vehicles. I also built model kits. Cars, planes, tanks, soldiers, knights, and then resin and vinyl character kits. It’s something I’ve been doing all my life. As I got older (and stopped blowing up everything I built), I really got into the rendering. Especially on monsters and creatures. And it’s one hobby I’ve always stuck to. Even now.

MWC: What do your family and friends think of your work?

WIRES: They all pretty much think it’s interesting and unique. And you have to understand, I was destined to be in construction, a plumber or a bartender (and there is absolutely nothing wrong with those professions. Did them all for years), so my family is especially surprised and excited. But of course, the hardest part is explaining to them exactly what I do. I guess they can’t wrap their heads around the fact that I don’t actually “play” with toys for a living.

MWC: There are lots of talented people in the world, but your work stands out every time I see it. What is it that gives you that edge?

WIRES: Thank you for that. Sincerely. I think though, it is because I am the epitome of the uber-nerd fanboy. I am completely immersed in the characters and comics, but at the same time I know this is a business and you are only as good as your latest project. I have a passion to do this, even after nine years, because it is not something I ever even dreamed existed as a profession, let alone as something I could make a career out of. And I have this obsessive compulsive personality (with a little bi-polar mixed in; ask anyone). And because of my love of toys, I want every piece I do (no matter what it is) to look like something I want to display in my collection.

MWC: You’re good friends with sculptor Bill Mancuso. How has that influenced you? And do you get the chance to collaborate a lot?

WIRES: We’ve been friends since first grade. He’s the one that encouraged me to put a portfolio together and do the comic-con thing. And after a whole summer of “No”, he encouraged me to go back the following summer and do it all over again. We’ve collaborated quite a bit on Palisades and Diamond projects.

MWC: Are there types of work or styles of figures that you prefer working with?

WIRES: I want to get my hands on everything. From flesh eating Trolls to Pokémon. In plastic, vinyl, or resin. Anime to portraiture. I want to work on everything for everyone. Like I said, I love this business and everything it has given me over the years. Of course, I like to work on the heavily rendered stuff the best, but that’s just icing on the cake.

MWC: You’ve worked on hundreds of figures in dozens of lines – any favorites that stand out?

WIRES: Believe it or not, I think I’ve actually past the thousands mark, and that to me is the greatest testament for my love of the industry. I mean sure, some projects are more challenging than others, but I’ve painted everything from fully rendered realistic to plastic coconut book danglers.

I say it all the time, but Marvel Legends is my favorite. It is the be-all-end all of mass market action figures. And growing up a Marvel Zombie, I got to work on a line of toys, which for decades only existed in my head. And then when it became a reality, all of my, “if this ever happens I’m gonna do this”¦” got to be applied. I got to work on some of my favorite characters of all time, and make them look like they existed in the real world, while staying faithful to their comic incarnations. And that’s what I was asked to do. And after the first few series, the push went harder and further against the envelope to outdo the series before it. And I think everyone involved accomplished just that. Even with the splinter lines (“Classics”). Years from now, people will still be excited about these. And I got to be a part of that magic collaboration.

One of the other things that stands out is the people I get to work with. I work with (and among) some of the most amazingly gifted and artistic people on the planet. Every single one of them adds something wonderful to my career.

MWC: Everyone likes to talk about their favorite work, but what about the stuff you weren’t happy with? Any figures that just didn’t turn out the way you envisioned them, or didn’t live up to your own expectations of your work?

WIRES: I can’t really think of anything. I mean yes, there are a few properties I wasn’t “in to”, or was indifferent to, but I approached them with the same excitement and enthusiasm as I would anything. I am just one cog in the gears that turn the wheel. And if someone is going to pay me money to paint something to look like their vision, I have to approach everything that way. After all, it is the toy “business”.

As far as product not turning out the way I did it, I can’t control that. I used to get upset that I put all of this work into something, and then the product came out very flat, but I got paid for the job, and then costs had to be cut somewhere. Paint application is always the first to get “cut” because it is the easiest way to wrangle your production costs back in. Ultimately, I do my part of the process, and whatever happens after that isn’t up to me.

MWC: What’s a day in the life of Eddie Wires really like?

WIRES: It’s like a day of sunshine filled with marshmallow clouds and fruit roll-up rainbows. Shattered by the deafening chatter of machine gun fire and the screams of those maimed and wounded and”¦

Sorry”¦

It’s actually a lot less exciting than most people would think. I know there is this illusion that toy people live and work like rock stars and set their own hours and “hang out and play” all the time, and that is furthest from the truth.
My day usually goes like this:

Get up around 7am. After getting the whole wake up, coffee, etc, out of the way, it’s a true work day. Phone calls, emails, more phone calls, lots of painting (yes, I’ll admit it, that is exciting no matter how you slice it), phone, paint, phone, paint, take pictures, more email, then FedEx. Ahh yes. The sweet sweet delivery system with by whose clock we live and die.

The actual breakdown of phase one could be pretty boring so I didn’t give a hit by hit account of it, but it is done pretty much every day. The only thing that really changes is what we’re actually working on.

So, now the FedEx drop-off has passed. Get a cup of coffee and drive home in rush hour traffic (but this is great for getting back in touch with west coast clients). No time to relax though. There’s a short bit of a break here for about an hour or so. I have to spend some time with the wife Y’know? I’m glad she is so understanding on those nights when I can’t though.

Then around 8 or 9pm after all of the phone calls and emails are done, this is when the real digging in honest to goodness no interruptions work gets done. Usually lasts til about till one or two in the morning. Another round of emails and voicemails and then it’s off to bed where I put something on the TV to fall asleep to.

I generally work around 60 to 70 hours a week, and as much as 100 hours or more a week before a big show (toy fair, comic con, etc). During those last few days before the shows it generally goes; work six hours, sleep two, work six hours, and sleep 2. But I wouldn’t change it for anything in the world.

MWC: Your experience has obviously taught you a great many tips and tricks to producing the best work. There are tons of customizers out there, and for many of them, getting the paint just right is the biggest battle. Any tips you can provide, or corrections to common mistakes that you see?

WIRES: I am absolutely blown away and amazed at some of the customized work I see (and I am always checking this stuff out), but the best advice I can give to anyone is; Always challenge yourself to find what works for you. Experiment with different paints (brands), different brushes, different techniques. Be your own worst critic. Don’t be afraid to redo something, even if it means starting completely over. Don’t ever look at something sloppy and say, “Well, that’s the best I can do.” Redo it. And redo it again, until it looks flawless. Straight lines, logos, cut lines (where one color meets another) should all look flawless. Push yourself to get there. You’re having fun along the way anyway. Take critique and advice when it is given. Then apply that to what you’re doing. Then do that over and over again.

“How do you get to Carnegie Hall?” Practice, practice, practice”¦

MWC: No action figure message board is complete without at least one thread on dream lines. C’mon, admit it – you’ve posted in those threads before. What’s your dream line?

WIRES: My absolute dream line would be a six inch Marvel Legends style line of”¦

I love that format and scale, and it can be applied to anything; Indiana Jones, Star Wars, G.I.Joe. I would love to see (and get to work on) that.

If I had answered this a year ago I would have said, “”¦style line of Conan, or Judge Dredd.” Someone in the heavens was listening to my wishes on that one. Wow. Now if I can just figure out how to get the other ones rolling.

MWC: What’s the hardest aspect of your job?

WIRES: The hardest part is the juggling. Work, life, work, marriage, work, yardwork, and all that jazz. I have so many interests outside of toys, and I just don’t have time to get to them. I used to play my guitar all the time, and now it actually has a layer of dust on it. I used to customize toys like crazy, now I have 3 filing cabinets full of “some day when I get around to it” projects. I love movies. I don’t get to really sit and watch them straight through anymore. It’s usually watching them for 30 or 40 minutes at a time over the course of several nights (sometimes I’ll buy a dvd, and before I even get a chance to watch it it is on broadcast cable), and in that time I have to spend time with my wife.

And I’m not complaining, mind you. I’ve chosen this life. I can turn work down if I want a little more free time. But why would I do that? Everything tends to work out how it should anyway. Sorry to ramble there on that one”¦

MWC: How does most of your work come in these days? Is it due to referrals within the industry, or do you still have to get out there and beat the bushes?

WIRES: It’s about 50/50. I find myself on the phone a lot. I try to keep in touch with people (in the industry), even if I am not working with them. You never know when they’re going to get a job they don’t have time for, and they need to subcontract it out. Better to be fresh in their minds. And then other times I’ll get a call out of the blue from someone I’ve never talked to who got a referral from someone I haven’t talked to in a year to do a project. It’s all a big part of this roller coaster ride of the toy industry. But this is where you as an individual comes into play, and you get to put your best foot forward.

MWC: I’m not a big fan of the personality test on Inside the Actor’s Studio, but there are two questions that are actually relevant here – what’s your favorite and least favorite color?

WIRES: Favorite color is black, because it generally goes on in one coat. Least favorite color is black because if you make a mistake with it, any other color is going to take several coats to cover it up.

MWC: You’re living the geek dream life. Any words of wisdom for those looking for that special place in the world?

WIRES: You have to keep the fanboy locked up inside you. All of your knowledge of specific issues and character appearances will come in handy, but no one will want to hear it unless they specifically ask for it. You have to read up on what everybody is doing. You have to remember that this is not about you and unless it is asked for, you should keep your opinion to yourself. You are doing work for hire.

In a nutshell, you have to be a well rounded person. You have to know more than just toys. You have to be able to hold your own in a conversation about anything and everything and be able to sell yourself at the same time. You have to be willing to take criticism and disappointment. You have to be able to network, and be willing to travel and spend money and cater to the needs of the company you are trying to get the work from. You have to be able to get the work done quickly, and efficiently at an affordable price. You have to be willing to learn all kinds of things you may not have an interest in. But, ultimately, you have to deliver. Against any and all odds. And you have to consistently deliver, so that the company or person who sends you the project has every confidence and assurance that you will get it done time and time again.

MWC: What do you do when you’re not working?

WIRES: I have rediscovered the joys of lifting weights and target shooting. I love reading and watching TV (thank gods for DVR) I play my guitar when I get the chance, but at the end of the day, as long as I get some time to spend each day with my wife, I’m happy.

MWC: Any final thoughts, political rants, social commentaries, or general ramblings you’d like to get off your chest?

WIRES: Oh I could on for hours about all of the above, but I’m not going to (but if you catch me in a bar after a few drinks; I just might).

I just want to thank you for letting me share my little piece of the pie in this wacky world we call the toy industry. And I want to thank all of the kids (young and old) who buy the toys. Keep buying them, so we can keep making them.

line.gif

Thanks to Eddie for taking the time to talk with me. If you’d like to see more of Ed’s work, hit his website, or hit the San Diego Comic Con in two weeks, where there will be lots and lots of new prototypes on display sporting a coat from Mr. Wires!

Party Favors: 100 Years – 100 Beers… Beer Run For The Missing 12 Pack

Filed under: Columns,Joe Corey's Party Favors — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:06 am

partyfavors1.jpg

As the buzz of making “100 Years – 100 Beers” died down, our eyes adjusted to the light and we realized that a few titles were on various lists that became stuffed between the sofa cushions. We’re not going to be a bunch of AFI wusses and claim that these lost nominees and votes will get factored in a decade from now. We’re not going to sneak in and rewrite the list and have Tony Snow claim that you misread the list. We’re going to do what every good party requires – A Beer Run for one more 12 Pack of Cinematic Joy.

Don’t ask where these titles rank with the 100 list. I’m not willing to bounce 12 titles from the first list. When you’re wasted and lying in bed during an orgy, you don’t get kick out that extra potential lover. Unless they’re whiney and keep pointing and going “that’s not good.” But none of these 112 titles are prudes. Here’s a 12 pack that rivals a dozen chilled bottles of Yuengling:

12. Mystery of the Leaping Fish (1916) – Douglas Fairbanks plays Coke Ennyday, a detective who can’t solve a crime until he gets wasted on dope. This sounds like the basis of a Showtime series.

11. Fifth Element (1997) – Anytime you’re trashed and you turn on the TV set, TBS has this in marathon mode. Milla Jovovich with orange hair still makes me drool although that might just be from being on the verge of passing out. Am I wrong in thinking that if I had Bruce Willis’ cellphone number and called him at 3 a.m. and said, “Bruce!” He’d say, “Do you need more booze? I’m coming over to party!”

10. Akira (1988) if I could figure out this Japanese anime flick, I would have been able to pass organic chemistry.

9. Half Baked (1998) – Have you ever looked at the back of the DVD box? Jon Stewart is in the bushes. Look at it!

8. The Care Bears Movie (1985) – It’s not good to fall asleep with so much booze in your body. By watching five minutes of the Care Bears, you’re guaranteed to puke up all the demon booze in your belly. The best hangover cure is to not have one.

7. The Jerk (1979) – If you watch this on TV, you’ll never know Steve Martin’s dog’s name. We were wasted one night and it struck us that since Steve merely sold his invention to the company, he should have been able to not be sued since the company was liable for the safety of the product.

6. The 5,000 Fingers of Dr. T (1953) – Dr. Seuss shows us the evils of piano lessons. If you get the DVD, there’s the uncut Horton Hatches An Egg cartoon complete with Peter Lorre fish blowing his brains out.

5. Reefer Madness (2005) – Until White Trash Wins Lotto comes out at the cineplex, this is the best damn musical. You might also want to watch the original anti-drug flick.

4. Evil Dead 2 (1987) – This is the one where Bruce Campbell has the chainsaw arm? Or is the knights? Or the tree sexually attacks the woman? I can’t remember. Best to just play all three flicks. We call Army of Darkness, Evil Dead at my house cause were too lazy to remember the rebranding.

3. The Warriors (1979) – See it now before the lame remake ruins your memory.

2. Porky’s (1982) has the greatest movie trailer ever made. Remember kids that putting your dork through a hole in a girl’s shower can be hazardous to your health.

1. Cheech and Chong’s Up In Smoke (1978) is the gold standard of wasted cinema. Do not attempt to match the on screen intake. The DVD has amazing deleted scenes including how a guard played by Harry Dean Stanton doped up the boys before they went before the judge.

« Newer Posts — Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress