Category: Trailer Park

  • Trailer Park: Monsters, BACK TO THE FUTURE: 25th ANNIVERSARY GIVEAWAY, DEAD SET, Top 10 for Halloween, 2010 International Horror and Sci-fi Film Festival

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    Check out my other column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

    MONSTERS – Review

    monsters-posterFirst, the raw numbers: this is director and writer Gareth Edwards’ first feature, the movie cost a purported $15,000, internationally speaking the film has grossed over 1.5 million dollars, this is the one film you need to see this fall.

    One of the spectacular aspects of a movie that is labeled sci-fi even though we only really glimpse the science of the fiction at the very beginning and then near the end which, really, is the crowning achievement of this little film that could, is that this movie exists at all. Actor Scoot McNairy, last seen in the very sweet and gentile film In Search of a Midnight Kiss, and his co-star Whitney Able are essentially starring in a film where the plot centers around a NASA probe that fell to earth bringing with it a squid like race of aliens who were quickly quarantined and contained. Now, you have a photojournalist (McNairy) who is willing to comprise the boundary in order to get a story but finds his plans scuttled by his boss daughter (Able) needing safe passage out of this hot zone by any means neccessary.

    What Edwards creates is not a visual feast, one would expect that out of a man who has built his reputation on crafting digital effects that ultimately won him a BAFTA award for his special effects work, but a movie that knows how to look like it was shot for millions more than it was. It’s a character piece that has as its backdrop an alien invasion, what it would be like to be a normal person in the middle of an incredible situation. McNairy shines in a role as a man who does more in simply interacting with his co-star than reacting like an unhinged hero that would ostensibly would have been his fate had a studio had its way with this movie.

    That’s where this movie is brilliant, you understand. There would have been a ratio of monsters to humans on screen if anyone else but Edwards filmed this movie and it’s so much better for it. There are moments where you can tell that this movie was shot on location without any regard to proper staging or formal set-ups, there’s a real run and gun feel to its pacing, but in a movie where time seems like such a precious commodity as these kids attempt to make for the coast to get out of a situation that ultimately pays off with a delightful effects barrage at the end of the film that is wonderfully timed. Again, if we had large set pieces throughout the film it would have taken away from the jolt that the ending brings, it would not have felt as special as it does. As it stands, however, the movie withholds its science fiction payoff until you find yourself nearly demanding we get something on the order of a full scale alien invasion. It’s of little interest to me, however, as the power of this first feature comes in the form of the relationships we see blossom in a way that feels genuine and real.

    Edwards is concerned with relationships as this is what millions in effects cannot buy: good performances. Believable performances. The allegory and subtext and everything else is just secondary to the moments we see where McNairy and Able come together in order to survive. It’s so much more satisfying to know that you can have special effects and good acting, the two not mutually exclusive, and Edwards genuinely delivers a special effects gut bomb that gives a preview of a filmmaker that is capable of going against what you’ve come to expect out of your action films. Edwards proves that reflection and human relationships can coexist with squid-like monsters that go bump in the night.

    While some may take contention with any number of flaws that seem to be de rigueur for any nerd looking to pick apart a film like this for its construction it’s not deserving of anything less than high praise. Praise for being a movie that shows what going back to basics can do and how, if you just focus on the core elements of what a good story should include, it is nothing less than an amazing achievement and sleight of hand as Edwards makes you believe there is a lot more money up on the screen than there is. It’s there, though, it’s in the performances.

    DEAD SET – Review

    dead-setWithout question, this is the program you should be watching on Halloween. Yes, after you’re done playing around watching movies that have no real scare value you ought to be tuning your television to IFC on Sunday night and look upon a UK production that found a fresh angle on the zombie genre. The premise seems deceptively simple yet is profound in not only defining the larger issue of what George Romero was going for in his own work but establishing a new benchmark for what it represents in the 2000’s.

    Writer Charlie Brooker and director Yann Demange suppose what it would look like if a zombie apocalypse closed in and around the perimeter of a television show. Big Brother, to be exact. What it would look like if the self-obsessed and vain members of a reality program had no idea that a flesh eating horde was eviscerating and ripping through the innards of the staff tasked to film them 24/7? It would look and feel a lot like it does here and I couldn’t have been more tickled at not only the way things just explode early on in this 5 part series but that from a sociological perspective it is redefining the zombie genre for a legion of viewers who might get the implicit meaning of why these dead heads are all converging on this little studio which feels like it’s in the middle of nowhere.

    One of the sheer delights of this program is watching Jaime Winstone who is utterly electric in not only conveying the right amount of terror but, when it’s needed, is able to be convincing as a person who is able to step up and get control of all the situations she’s put in. And the situations are numerous. From evading the initial invasion where the body count is high and everyone is a possible victim thanks to a cast that is all but unknown to laypersons here in the States. Part of the awfulness of modern U.S. interpretations of zombie horror is if you have a cast of folks people know it kind of takes the fun out of the randomness of it all. Who’s going to get it next? Who’s gonna die? All questions that are never taken off the table as Winstone, who plays Kelly, makes her way to relative safety.

    The members of the Big Brother house, thinking that their being cut off from any interaction from their television producers is an elaborate stunt, are blissfully unaware at the gradual onslaught that is creepily coming closer and about to befall them. The politics of reality television, right in the middle of a story where people’s intestines are being consumed, are seamlessly woven into a script that is tight and moves at a pace that you find yourself hoping will slow down if to only take it all in.

    deadset102Sure, there are moments of relative calm and introspection but the thing about this series is that it is building to something. It’s building to a crescendo where zombies are going to overrun the Big Brother house and we see how those living there deal with what happens when it does.

    The ending, it should be noted, is one that completely satisfies. Not in a long time have I seen a story finish with as much bold dedication to knowing that the people who made this did so fully realizing there wasn’t going to be a second or third installment. Zack Snyder ‘s Dawn of the Dead had an ending that supposed there wasn’t going to be a next installment and Dead Set is no different.

    The performances are thoroughly delightful in this entire series as the ever increasingly small amount of space not occupied by flesh eating corpses leaves us with a showdown that won’t leave you hungry. You cannot do better than free on Halloween night so treat yourself to a series that will reaffirm that there is still blood running through the veins of this genre, that there is still something worthy to say about the culture we live in and the zombies that roam within it.

    Ten You Need to Dig Up – Ray Schillaci

    Every Halloween critics and fans alike start a ten best list omitting a lot of good scares for the season. We are well aware of the impact “The Exorcist” “Texas Chainsaw Massacre and “Halloween” had on our sleepless nights. Even some of the more obscure have made the people’s ten; “Re-Animator” “Phantasm” and “Basketcase”. This is why I have gone to the trouble of finding some overlooked gems that are classics in their own way. All of the following can be rented at Blockbuster, Red Box or Netflix. Below I’ve given a brief description, free of spoilers. Enjoy.

    The Burrowers ““ A creepy little horror/western yarn that succeeds in bringing both genres together for the fans. A family of settlers disappears under mysterious circumstances and a rescue party find themselves immersed knee-deep in sub-humanoid terrors. Not as intense an experience as “The Descent” but edgier than 2004’s western/horror opus, “Dead Birds”.

    Midnight Meat Train ““ What can one say about a story by Clive Barker? When filming the man’s vision you either sink (like “Rawhead Rex”) or swim (“Hellraiser” or “Candyman”). This one swims a 10 minute mile. MMT stars Bradley Cooper before he became a big name and the foreboding charms of Vinnie Jones (“Lock, Stock & Two Smoking Barrels” “Snatch”). A photographer tracks down a serial killer on the subway trains. What transpires is not for the faint of heart. Brutal, gruesome and poetic, this tale has been eerily realized to film. It would be a crime not to experience this one on Blu-Ray.

    Grace ““ One word”¦ Nasty. This film is wrong on so many levels, but the bizarre storyline coupled with the unnerving direction insists that you watch it through to the end. A woman who has had several miscarriages is almost able to carry to term, when she is told a month or so before that she is carrying a dead fetus. She insists on continuing to carry it to term. What happens from there is the stuff Hitchcockian nightmares are made of.

    Zombie Strippers ““ I know what you’re saying, “Jenna Jameson? Why is this on a list of any kind?” For those who loved Robert Rodriguez and Quentin Tarantino’s “Grindhouse,” you will find this film fitting that bill. It’s all in the name of fun and gore. The acting is capital “B” and the effects are a joy. It caters to the lowest common denominator with its nudity and over-the-top violence. It also has many of us laughing out loud because it never tries to take itself seriously, but does deliver on a very primal level.

    Teeth ““ This one hurts (especially for us men). A gruesome little independent entry involving a young woman coming of age and discovering her period is not the only thing that is about to give her trouble. Hint; it comes equipped with teeth and spoils any chances of a serious relationship. What’s a girl to do?

    Splinter ““ One of those rare movies that makes you question, “What in God’s name am I watching?” A claustrophobic edge-of-your-seat thriller that has several people barricading themselves in a gas station convenience store in the middle of nowhere while some mutated splintery thing attempts to absorb them. A great cross between the John Carpenter favorite, “The Thing” and the classic, “The Blob”. Except this entity has spines and breaks apart bone and flesh while interacting with it. This shocker is an utterly gruesome display of sights and sounds.

    Shallow Ground ““ A movie that is are hard to watch even during the credits. A naked teenage boy covered in blood is discovered by a small town sheriff. The mystery; where is he from and whose blood is on him? This is a true nail-biter that can be very difficult to watch for some. Don’t let anybody tell you the ending.

    Let the Right One In ““ You might have heard of the American version, “Let Me In”. But no matter what you have heard, it will not prepare you for the most beautifully told vampire movie ever made. It’s both subtle and frightening. The acting is top drawer along with everything else. The only qualm I have is that the Magnet DVD release has not been true to the original subtitles from the theatrical release and you should not watch this film dubbed. It would be a crime. You may not understand what the actors are saying (except when you read the subtitles), but their voices are haunting along with the imagery.

    Coffin Joe Trilogy ““ This one caters to the little kid in all of us that happened to catch what was scary when viewing “Fright Night with Seymour” or “Chiller Theater”. This foreign horror trilogy is all about the original boogeyman from Brazil. Banned in several countries, but seemingly mild by today’s standards, director/actor Jose Mojica Marins brings a wonderful sense of forbidden nostalgia. The soundtrack alone is creepy enough. Coffin Joe’s goal in life is the continuity of his blood. He seeks the perfect woman to have his perfect child and all others will suffer a gruesome death, along with any that stand in his way.

    Trailer Park of Terror ““ The name states it all. A trashy, kitschy horror flick bringing sex and gore to the forefront without batting an eye. It also comes with a dash of gallows humor that gives it an irresistible must-see factor for All Hallows Eve. A youth ministries pastor and his small troubled high school flock happen to have their bus breakdown near the trailer park from hell. Beware of trashy redneck zombies!

    There you have it, films to spice up your holiday season. They may not rank up there with such holiday classics like “Miracle on 34th Street” or “It’s a Wonderful Life,” but they are a good mix of films if you’ve grown weary of “Psycho” or “Night of the Living Dead” for Halloween. If you wish to venture further into the unknown, check out these titles as well; “Dead & Breakfast” “Altered” “Behind the Mask” “Fido” “Dead Snow” “Alien Raiders “and “Dance of the Dead”. All are worthy of your Halloween viewing pleasure. Have a safe and happy one.

    BACK TO THE FUTURE: 25TH ANNIVERSARY – Giveaway

    back-to-the-future-bluray-300x300It was fate.

    I was in line buying the one thing any film fan should be squandering their cash on this week when I heard I had a package at home. As I put down my copy of the Back to the Future: 25th Anniversary I opened the FedEx that arrived and what should I see staring back at me but 5 copies of these little beauties. I was in love for no other reason than I can now share what is, ostensibly, one of the best adventure movies of the 80’s.

    Long before Robert Zemeckis made 3D films with kids that have creepy hollow eyes he made a movie that captured the zeitgeist of a young generation that was already in love with Alex P. Keaton, Michael J. Fox. The series of films, and let’s be completely honest and say that part 3 isn’t as strong as the other two, represent a solid trilogy that is more than worthy of a double dip in that the slew of extras that we get make this more than a worthy reinvestment. Again, this thing is packed to the gills with content and should be considered a necessary addition to your collection.

    For those wanting a copy of one of the best box sets to come out this year all you have to do is simple: Send me a note at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com and just let me know who was the first person to step foot in Marty McFly’s shoes before Fox replaced him.

    It’s just that easy, people. And, before he gets an itchy trigger finger, if your initials just happen to be RS you aren’t eligible so don’t even bother clogging my e-mail box with a desperate plea for one.

    For those wanting to know what extras you can expect on this bad boy here they are:

    New 25th Anniversary Restorations Deliver Perfect Picture and Purest Digital Sound Available

    Blu-ray Exclusives
    # U-Control
    # Setups & Payoffs: Note key scenes and see how they play out as you watch the movies
    # Storyboard Comparison: Compare key scenes in the movie with the original storyboards.
    # Trivia Track: Get inside trivia and facts while you watch the movies.
    # Pocket BLU: Experience Blu-ray in an exciting new way with the app for iPhone, iPod touch, BlackBerry, Android and more
    # BD-Live: Access the BD-Live Center through your Internet-connected player and download even more bonus content, the latest trailers and more
    # My Scenes: Bookmark your favorite scenes from the movies

    Bonus Features
    # “Tales from the Future:” 6-part retrospective documentary featuring all-new interviews with Michael J. Fox, Christopher Lloyd, Lea Thompson, Director Robert Zemeckis, Producers Bob Gale and Neil Canton plus Executive Producer Steven Spielberg
    # “In the Beginning…”
    # Time to Go
    # Keeping Time
    # Time Flies
    # Third Times the Charm
    # The Test of Time
    # The Physics of Back to the Future
    # 16 Deleted Scenes
    # Michael J. Fox Q&A
    # Archival Featurettes
    # The Making of Back to the Future Parts I, II & III
    # Making The Trilogy: Chapters One, Two & Three
    # Back to the Future Night
    # The Secrets of the Back to the Future Trilogy
    # Behind-the-Scenes
    # Outtakes
    # Original Makeup Tests
    # Nuclear Test Side Ending Storyboard Sequence
    # Outtakes
    # Production Design
    # Storyboarding
    # Designing the DeLeorean
    # Designing Time Travel
    # Hoverboard Test
    # Designing Hill Valley
    # Designing the Campaign
    # Photo Galleries Including Production Art, Additional Storyboards, Behind-the-Scenes Photographs, Marketing Materials and Character Portraits Music Videos
    # “The Power of Love” by Huey Lewis and the News
    # “Doubleback” by ZZ Top
    # Back to the Future: The Ride
    # Q&A Commentaries with Director Robert Zemeckis and Producer Bob Gale Feature Commentaries with Producers Bob Gale and Neil Canton

    The Creepy, the Weird and the Wonderful: 2010 Int’l Horror and Sci-fi Film Festival by Ray Schillaci

    This year’s horror and sci-fi film fest out of Tempe, AZ oozed talent that had some squirming in their seats, if not occasionally running out of the theater due to the intensity. You know you have something when you get a reaction like that ““ especially when the rest of the crowd applauds your film in the end. I’ll get to that one later. But first, kudos to the professionals that graced us with their films, generous Q&A’s and signings; actor/producer/ director Adam Busch (Drones), Charles Cyphers (The Fog), Lance Henricksen (Aliens) and the fetching Tiffany Shepis (2010’s Night of the Demons). Also, a big shout out to Midnight Movie Mamacita, Andrea Beesley-Brown for presenting us with a great 35mm print of Dario Argento’s classic fright fest, “Suspiria.” Patrons and filmmakers alike relished the eclectic and ghoulish atmosphere provided by the festivities and many first timers were already anticipating next year’s festival.

    64366_151962331508283_131919683512548_233485_7468347_nAn added bonus was the abundance of creative shorts by both horror and science fiction filmmakers. Unfortunately, I somehow missed the winners of the horror shorts; “The Furred Man” Best Horror Short and “Abra Cadaver” Best Horror Student Short. But I can only imagine what they were like since the competition was so stiff (pun intended). I will try to get a copy of them and report back. I do have to congratulate some of the noteworthy filmmakers that received an enthusiastic response. In the horror cateGory, Richard Holmas’ “Rise of the Appliances” gave rise to big laughs. You can only imagine, but the visual is better. Rory Lowe’s “The Midge” was a creep fest and literally got under our skin. “The Familiar” directed by Kody Zimmerman was a unique vampire tale with clever dialogue and good acting. It was a perfect pitch for a cultish full length feature. Then two absolute standouts were Voltaire’s “DemiUrge Emesis” and Rebecca Thomson’s over-the-top “Cupcake: A Zombie Lesbian Musical”.

    I could not possibly give enough praise to “DemiUrge Emesis” for the sheer creative power it emits with a wonderful narration by Danny Elfman. Voltaire is a true visionary with his unique and short animated tale of a mummified cat that is tormented by the skeletons of its past meals. The process used is similar to “Nightmare Before Christmas” and “Corpse Bride,” but the outcome feels richer in its presentation ““ even though it is a short. Voltaire flew in from New York to do a Q&A and entertained us with the making of his short subject and was a wealth of information regarding the process he so admires. He did mention that he can be found on the internet with his other short films, but warned that if we look him up there would be two Voltaires ““ “one dead French guy and me”. The word around the festival was that he already has a very strong cult following.

    Then there was “Cupcake”¦” What can you say about a short that manages to stuff itself with zombies, lesbians and musicals? Rebecca Thomson is totally out of control and throws everything in ““ including the kitchen sink, in her whacked out gore fest, in-your-face, politically incorrect musical. Does it work? Yes, for the most part, with some big laughs. It’s no “Rocky Horror,” but what is? The opening is shockingly funny with two old ladies singing about how they prefer having zombies roam their neighborhood than having the lesbians as neighbors and the lyrics are Raunchy. That’s just half the fun. When the zombies and lesbians clash the results are beyond outrageous. MPAA would have a field day never letting this short see a mainstream theater. But Thomson never went in with that notion. Her short is bawdy, flagrant and highly contagious. The audience was laughing, cheering and probably gave it the loudest applause of any short or feature at the festival. “Cupcake; the Zombie Lesbian Musical” is a real crowd pleaser for those with open minds.

    68716_154641327907050_131919683512548_242478_1857884_nThe sci-fi short winners were well deserved with Jesse Griffith’s “Cockpit: The Rules of Engagement,” Best Sci-Fi Short and Anders Overgaard’s “Kontakt” Best Sci-Fi Student Short. “Cockpit”¦” had not only a very cool look to it, that set it apart from some of the bleaker entries, it also reminded one of the Twilight Zone episode with the gargoyle on the wing of a plane. The setting is 2103 and the one rule in fighter combat is keeping a mind controlling alien race away from Earth. The added bonus to our enjoyment was having the always welcomed Ronny Cox as one of the stars. “Kontakt” also came equipped with a distinct visual style that was both mysterious and intriguing. The story involving a UFO obsessed teen who finally gets to experience his dream or is it a nightmare?

    Other notable sci-fi shorts were “One Small Step” demonstrating what really happened on that historic day on the moon ““ wonderfully realized. “The Necronomicon” makes for a great SNL faux commercial. “The Adjustable Cosmos” is a wonderful piece of creative animation regarding three worthies in the fifteenth century attempting to change the Emperor’s horoscope. Finally, Adam Varney’s “S.P.A.G.H.E.T.T.-1” won me over with its over-the-top premise that seems to fall in line with other pieces blending history with horror or sci-fi ala “Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter”. A Southern scientist deceives his former assistant in order to change the outcome of the Civil War.

    In the sci-fi feature category the most notables were a couple of bizarre conspiracy driven tales and a Stephen King story. “Zenith” a retro-futuristic steam-punk thriller focuses on two men in two time periods. Their search for a grand conspiracy leads them to question their own humanity. Complex and fascinating, “Zenith” keeps us guessing all the way up to the end. It’s not a pretty picture with its harsh take on where we are going, but it definitely has something important to offer.

    rageIt was the Stephen King story, “Everything’s Eventual” a film by JP Scott that took home the Best Sci-Fi Film Award. Sad to say I missed this one too. But I did catch the winner of Best Sci-Fi Screenplay and the judges were right on the money with this one. Conspiracy driven, “Lunopolis” written by Matthew Avant was engrossing to the end. Shot like “Paranormal Activity,” but far more complicated and intense. If it was not set in the near future (and instead present day) it could cause a real stir. It starts with a frantic call to a radio station that eventually leads to an investigation (ala Ghost Hunters) in the Louisiana Atchafalaya Basin where an enormous underground facility is discovered and a very bizarre looking machine is found. From there, mysterious men in suits, religious cults and an internet phenomenon spin a wild tale that leads to the end of the Mayan calendar.

    Finally, horror truly ruled the day with two one-word-titled films creeping neck-to-disembodied-neck. Elias Matar and Edward E. Romero’s “Ashes” won Best Horror Screenplay and Chris Witherspoon’s “Rage” won Best Horror Film. This was so close and let me tell you why. The intensity that Witherspoon demonstrates in his direction and editing technique is gut-wrenching. If there is the slightest kink in the armor of the exercise (and demonstration) of “Rage” it is a minor (and please let me emphasize “minor”) flaw with the screenplay. Both points were actually brought up to producer Shawn Smith and director Chris Witherspoon and although they had reasonable explanations, the film would have knocked it out of the ballpark if those points were addressed in the script, which is why Elias Matar and Edward E. Romero edged them out of Best Screenplay with “Ashes.”

    ashesMatar operates like a skilled surgeon when addressing horror. He has carefully constructed a film that could have easily been just another entry in the Zombie genre. But Matar wanted much more than that, instead he preferred a pacing that unsettled us and eventually caught us off guard. He and Romero show affection for their characters and in turn, they are not just victims waiting to die. In fact, we are the victims for caring and Matar succeeds on many levels bringing the horror of a frightening infectious disease to life. Upping the ante on the talent meter is lead actor, Brian Krause who displays warmth and dismay in a wonderful versatile performance. This slowly unnerving film cannot help draw comparisons to Greg Bear’s eerie and gripping book “Blood Music” and the early works of David Cronenberg, which makes Elias Matar a talent to be watched for in the future.

    As mentioned before, “Rage” was the big winner not only with the award but the audience as well, at least, most of the audience. Either some could not handle the mounting tension or the certain scene (sending patrons running out of the theater) that I will not mention to avoid a spoiler. What I will say about that scene is that you hear more than you see and that’s probably what makes it so hard to sit through, but it is integral to demonstrate the “rage” that follows.

    It’s akin to seeing the original “Texas Chainsaw Massacre” for the first time. You think you see all sorts of things, but you don’t. Kudos to director Witherspoon for the impact he made on his audiences at the festival. This is not just a tale of violence; it is a complicated story involving infidelity and a mystery behind who is actually chasing our protagonist. That’s what makes this film hit us so hard ““ aside from Witherspoon’s taut directing and editing. Witherspoon exposes the true horror of infidelity like it’s rarely been done before.

    “Rage” starts off with issues in a marriage, later revealing that the husband, Dennis Twist, has rediscovered the love for his wife and wants to break off a dalliance with his mistress. She questions his intentions and feels as if he is actually separating from her due to a jealous boyfriend that just got out of jail. Good enough reason to leave anyway. Not much later, Dennis unintentionally provokes the wrath of a dark helmeted motorcyclist. “The Duel” commences throughout the day starting with taunts and eventually escalating out of control. It’s not so much who is the mysterious biker, but what the wrath he brings that is so horrifyingly haunting. By the time it’s over the viewer may be left with one of those, “that’s f*cked up” moments. The closest reference I can use is “Fatal Attraction” where the viewer keeps saying, “Oh no, don’t do that!”

    That is not a weak point in this intense thriller. That is director Witherspoon getting under your skin and making you curl up in a ball and not wanting to go there. Mr. Witherspoon was very hands on in the making of his vision. He was not only the director and one of the producers, but he also multi-tasked as writer, cinematographer, editor, visual effects man and the Biker. As mentioned before the pacing is near perfect (if not for a brief unneeded recap sequence) and beautifully shot, making the film look much more expensive than it is. “Rage” proves to be far more horrific than pure violence.

    imagescajsfdr9In addition, there were two films at the Int’l Horror & Sci-Fi Film Fest that nearly defy description and will probably cater to a much targeted audience. Stuart Simpson’s “El Monstro Del Mar!” and the mad geniuses behind last year’s “Tokyo Gore Police” presenting “Robo-Geisha.” Neither of these films is fit for normal consumption, but do merit a mention because of their flagrantly giddy use of satisfying the ten year old minds of grown men.

    “El Monstro”¦” starts off super charged with plenty of promise accompanied by three tattooed retro beauties on a killing spree. It immediately reminds one of a cross between “The Devil’s Rejects” and “From Dusk till Dawn.” This would not be bad if the promise was fulfilled. Instead it eventually peters out in a bloodbath duel with a monster from the deep, a Kraken. Yes, it is as ridiculous as it sounds, but apparently done all in the name of fun. Later, “EMDM” proves to be more like an early Roger Corman flick rather than a retro-fitted Tarantino homage treat.

    And, then there was “Robo-Geisha.” The depravity of it all is filled with ass swords, a vomiting giant robot, machine gun tits and so much more. I literally found my mind melting as I tried to crawl my way out to the lobby to enjoy the company of a gore girl, a contestant from the “Beat the Geek” contest or one of the many vendors that proved far less taxing on my sanity. All kidding aside the festival was one of those rare treats one must experience during the Halloween season, a true holiday staple for Tempe and the Madcap Theaters.

  • Trailer Park: THE COW THAT WANTED TO BE A HAMBURGER, THE SOCIAL NETWORK

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    Check out my other column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

    The Cow Who Wanted to be a Hamburger – Review

    cow-postcardInstead of piling on two reviews for Bill Plympton’s work last week I decided to split this one up, his latest short film, The Cow Who Wanted to be a Hamburger.

    Why this short, clocking in at less than six minutes, is notable and deserved a little ink was how much of a departure it might seem to those who have been used to Plympton’s work for the past couple of decades.

    While you’re used to images that look sketched out on paper, filled in with colored pencils, and animated in the back and forth motion that is all Bill’s this one is a sight to behold. Using vibrant hues that seem pure as the name Crayola, the greens and the blues and reds just bursting with eye-popping flair, Bill takes a detour from a production like Idiots and Angels insofar that this is a story that is tightly packed in order to hit the post within the few minutes we have with these characters. These characters being cows.

    Not in any way your normal cows, this is a Bill Plympton short after all, one of these bovines starts the story by suckling at his mom’s teat and happens to catch a billboard out of the corner of his eye. The billboard is showcasing a luscious hamburger and this calf is inspired. The calf wants to be that hamburger. His mother, wise heifer she is, knows this is absolutely unacceptable but is powerless to try and sway her son to think that wanting to become a burger means certain death.

    The short then shows how focused this young cow becomes on being strong, on becoming fattened enough, worthy enough, to be slaughtered.

    Without giving anything away about where the path eventually takes this cow the short raises quick, poignant questions about advertising, the ethical questions surrounding slaughter of these animals, and, also, what a mother’s love is capable of in world like this. Yes, there is no real time for long rumination about the implications for these things but that’s the beauty of this short, it sets up a story, raises a question, and gives a resolution. Like a wonderful short story that makes you wonder what would happen if it was turned into a longer version of its former self, this is a perfect example of how Plympton can take something short form or long form and make it just the right length. The man is still at the top of his game and this short was an utter delight.

    The Highly UNsocial Network by Ray Schillaci

    facebook-film-460_1668713cWith all the praise heaped on Fincher and Sorkin’s “the social network,” coupled with one of the most emotionally charged trailers I have seen in years, the studio appeared to tout the film as an amazing experience.  It suggested a representation of a timely and impactful moment that has made a tremendous change in so many lives.  But that is not what the film is about.  Instead it proves to be as detached (allegedly), as the lead character himself, Mark Zuckerberg co-founder of facebook.  This is not to say that director, David Fincher and writer, Aaron Sorkin’s latest opus is anything less than an exercise in fine filmmaking.  But they have missed a very important mark that the trailers merely touched upon”¦how facebook affected so many (and still does) of us in so little time.  Yes, the trailer did tease us with, “You don’t get to 500 million friends without making a few enemies.”Â  Interesting premise, but is there any cost if we don’t give a shit about that person?

    Maybe the powers that be felt the unique and harmonious affect that facebook created was not as intriguing as a socially inept person, craving recognition, inventing the greatest social network in the history of the web just because he felt wrongfully scorned and in turn, learns how to be an ultimate (albeit reluctant) asshole.  Not only does he gain billions of dollars, but much like “Citizen Kane,” has no one to share it with.  He started off as a sad pathetic young man and turned into a sadder more pathetic rich man who’s learned very little about himself and those he affected.

    I have no problem with this road taken, except I can’t help feel that the studio sold us a bill of goods with those great trailers.  In no way shape or form do the trailers match the mood or theme of the picture itself.  In fact, this film is very reminiscent in theme and character study to “Citizen Kane” and “There Will Be Blood,” except that this story is belabored with a lead character that has all the emotional interest of white bread.

    We open with the scene that everybody seems to be enamored with; the one between, the struggling to be recognized, Zuckerberg and his long suffering girlfriend.  The dialogue is quick, snappy and almost lost.  I’m not sure if it was the theater sound, but the background was nearly as amped up as the dialogue itself.  In a way, it was trying to make out a conversation in one of those bars or coffeehouses where the acoustics are purposely bad for the appearance of making the place a happening spot.  If this was the intention of director, Fincher, then he captured it successfully, but it was also distracting and annoying.  This is the very beginning of the detached viewing experience and we are slowly pulled away from each and every character as the film continues and that is where the problem lies.

    There is no champion to root for, no emotional base, just annoying and sad individuals caught up in a superficial world of haves and have-nots.  The film is told through a series of depositions that reflect on those involved with the creation of facebook.  Zuckerberg is a wunderkind with computer programming, but dense when it comes to human contact.  After railing against his girlfriend via the internet, he decides to hack into several college websites and create a site where everyone is able to compare the women of the campuses and Zuckerberg manages to create not only a social phenomenon but get labeled as the biggest ass on campus.

    the-social-network-2010-006But his antics do not go unrecognized.  He is quickly approached by some fellow Harvard students (wonderfully underplayed by Armie Hammer) regarding an elitist type social network.  Zuckerberg is aware that he is about to be used.  After all, these guys come from a more affluent background and are not only juniors, but the lacrosse stars of the school.  They have the germ of an idea, but no clue as to how to bring it in to fruition.  Zuckerberg on the other hand sees the potential and seizes the day by getting a sixteen week head start and uses (literally) his best friend to finance the project with the upfront promise of an uneven partnership (70/30).  He later enlists the aid of Napster founder, Sean Parker (Justin Timberlake in a very juicy role), to develop facebook with his own vision and everyone else be damned.  And, they are, as the facebook social network grows with lightening fast speed catching the attention of f**kable groupies, big investors and A-hole lawyers.

    The irony of it all is that we witness the growing and nurturing of this amazing social web tool while every character in the film, except for Zuckerberg’s original girlfriend, remains stunted and just a tool”¦a dick.  Is anybody wrong with their accusations against the brainchild?  Perhaps the lacrosse twins are (in this viewers opinion), but they appear as a mere stumbling block rather than a true threat.

    The closest to sympathy we ever have for a character is Zuckerberg’s long suffering partner, Eduardo Saverin.  Andrew Garfield is saddled with this thankless whiny role and does the best he can to bring likability to his character while his co-star Jesse Eisenberg plays the title character in a rather cool and subdued manner.  He also brings with him a true sense of detachment which we have not seen in his other performances.  There is no likability factor here.  In the past, we have been able to relate to Eisenberg’s disenchanted or comically troubled youth pictures the same way we have with actor, Michael Cera.  In fact, some say they are practically interchangeable in their roles.  But I would have to disagree when it comes to this film.  Eisenberg delivers a far more dimensional performance that could give him a lead in future casting.

    Fincher and Sorkin capture the upper crust college set beautifully.  Sorkin’s script is tight and clever while Fincher continues to wow us with his pacing and obvious style that puts him alongside some of the great directors of our time.  Once again, the only problem with the film is its publicity machine and its lack of repeatable viewing factor.  At least with “There Will Be Blood” we were given fair warning as to what we were in for and the character study was fascinating.

    The trailers to “the social network” present a warm fuzzy feeling with a hint of irony.  This film is a cold heartless bitch that presents itself proudly and says watch me flex my Oscar muscles and live with it.  This is a well made film, but it does not deserve to be in a race to the Oscar.  It has the same cold detached feeling that we received from Fincher’s “Panic Room” that went virtually ignored.

    Don’t get me wrong, I am a huge fan of David Fincher.  I championed “Fight Club” “Se7en” “”¦Benjamin Button” and even “Alien3″.    Other David Fincher films have been better executed, including the underappreciated “Zodiac”.  “the social network” is one of the slicker films out this year, but lacks the heart of what makes us enjoy the social experience of watching movies with others.

  • Trailer Park: IDIOTS AND ANGELS, GET HIM TO THE GREEK

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    Check out my other column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

    Idiots and Angels – Review

    plymptonHow do you look at a blank canvas and create a world where you are held back by language but want to tell a story that anyone can understand?

    Artists have been doing this for thousands of years, trying to distill the innate things that connect every human being regardless of time or geography. Animator Bill Plympton may not be a Flemish master but his latest feature length film, Idiots and Angles, transcends every normal narrative construction and delivers a wonderfully realized world where a story about redemption doesn’t feel rehashed or tired.

    When we come into the world of Angel we are brought not only into the world of a man whose sole objective seems to be how much more angry he can be than the day before but we’re introduced into a world where there is no dialogue, no voiceover, no transitions. In fact, the world feels particularly unique as Plympton’s animation is given to fits and starts of natural movement, a trademark of his, with the absurd becoming absolutely normal. To wit, Angel reacts harshly to a perceived parking slight from another motorist and responds by creating a fuse into the other motorists’ gas tank whereby that car delightfully explodes as it careens down a city street. However insane this world is, though, Plympton’s use of depth and perspective never feels jarring or out of place. It just is and we accept it because it’s the character who never utters a word, Angel, that is so fascinating to watch on the screen. Through a series of grunts and guttural noises that humans universally use to show signs of great pleasure or disdain we see what a vile seed Angel is. Plympton sets up this man who is, by all intents and purposes, a just plain unlikable and does what any person looking to shake things up with a little Kafkaesque bizarreness would do with this guy: make him sprout wings.

    So, what follows is a story that has Angel growing a pair of wings that obviously cause the man great annoyance. But of course they won’t come off with a little clipping, but of course he can’t get rid of them, the joy of the film comes at seeing how others would wish to use Angel as a means to their own fortune and fame. The story takes shape around the themes of exploitation and naked ambition whereby no one, not even Angel’s doctor who he goes to for help, is able to resist thinking about how their own lives could benefit from the man’s tragedy.

    Take this tale where you want, Plympton’s work is easily interpretable in many different fashions as it relates to the human condition and the shameless depths people will go to satisfy their own base desires before thinking of the needs of a human being in need of actual assistance.

    Ballasted by a soundtrack that is simply exquisite, helping to serve as a gentle, invisible hand guiding you through the insanity that is this man’s life when it all spins out of control, the film relies on making sure we understand that there is something to be felt for this man, this Angel. Of course, what movie about redemption could be had without mentioning the conflict that will eventually bring us to a satisfying resolution. In a movie where nothing is based on any formal laws of normalcy it would be a shame to ruin a plotline that is almost too strange to put to paper but when jealousy rears its head Angel is the only person at the center of it.

    Through a series of fantastic moments that could only come out of Plympton’s own sense of how to make the insane something glorious to witness, breaks laws of physics and reality along woth it, the film ends satisfyingly with a resolution that affirms that beauty can come out of chaos and that even though things can sometimes unravel in the worst way possible, with people showing themselves to be the greedy, self-interested animals they are, that there can be that one person who shows you there is something to believe in when it comes to humanity. That there can be redemption, in whatever form it takes. The mere fact that Plympton does this without ever uttering a word, that it could transcend geographic boundaries and be comprehended by even the meagerly educated is a triumph in itself, let alone knowing this film is representative of animation that can pierce the skin and speak to something intrinsic in us all.

    Get Him To The Greek – DVD Giveaway

    16cdwcg6I should not have liked this film simply based on its premise.

    When you consider how many people thought that Forgetting Sarah Marshall was an exercise in mediocre filmmaking there was little hope that those of us who stayed away from this movie based on that would come out to see what would be a surprising hit. Filled with genuine laughs and a surprising comedic turn from Puff Daddy himself, Sean Combs, the movie is a much welcomed reprieve from some seriously bad studio comedies this year.

    So now you can own a copy of the movie that will show you why Russell Brand is indeed the real thing and why Jonah Hill will always be a clutch sidekick. All you have to do is send an entry to Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com and I’ll enter  you to win. It just doesn’t get easier than this, kids.

    About The Film:

    Aaron Greenberg (Hill) gets things done. The ambitious 23-year-old has exaggerated his way into a dream job just in time for a career-making assignment. His mission: Fly to London and escort a rock god to L.A.’s Greek Theatre for the first-stop on a $100-million tour. His warning: Turn your back on him at your own peril.

    British rocker Aldous Snow (Brand) is both a brilliant musician and walking sex. Weary of yes men and piles of money, the former front man is searching for the meaning of life. But that doesn’t mean he can’t have a few orgies while he finds it. When he learns his true love is in California, Aldous makes it his quest to win her back”¦right before kick-starting his world domination.

    As the countdown to the concert begins, one intern must navigate a minefield of London drug smuggles, New York City brawls and Vegas lap dances to deliver his charge safe and, sort of, sound. He may have to coax, lie to, enable and party with Aldous, but Aaron will get him to the Greek.

  • Trailer Park: WALL STREET: MONEY NEVER SLEEPS, THE OFFICE: SEASON 6 Giveaway, ROBIN HOOD Giveaway

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    Check out my other column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

    The Exploding Girl -DVD Review

    girlBradley Rust Gray has made a film that champions life and love the way it happens, unfolds, and dissolves: slowly.

    All you really need to know about this film, which stars Zoe Kazan as Ivy, a girl you wish you could have known throughout your own formative years, is that it is really an intimate portrait of a woman who has a boyfriend waiting for at the college she’s currently attending, she is coming home for spring break, and she is connecting with her old friend Al (Mark Rendall).

    What happens after these two re-connect after having been away from one another for a while is the basis for what can only be called one of the most gentle examinations of young people I have seen all year. Kazan has a minimalist style when it comes to pacing and framing a scene but that works oh so well here because our subjects themselves are unpolished and aren’t weighed down with the accouterments of real life bearing down on them.

    This is the time, college, when relationships with people are quickly formed and can be dissolved just as fast. The character trait that Ivy has an unfortunate medical condition whereby she is prone to stress related seizures only punctuates the fragility of this woman as she tries to discover just what it is she wants. More importantly, she is also trying to discover what it is she can handle. We watch as Al and Ivy quietly tiptoe around each other, the ritualistic dance many boy/girl friends have done since time immemorial, trying to see whether there is a fit for this person beyond just friendship. It’s a defining time for these two people as they knock around a big city, the camera feeling like an intimate conduit that is beaming us a real time blow-by-blow of the events of people who feel so real.

    Kazan, for her part, deserves all the kudos for acting in a movie that showcases her to have a real talent at just being, well, real. We believe her because she believes in the strength of Ivy and this movie could not be more worthy of your acceptance and attention.

    The DVD is available now.

    Red Riding Trilogy – DVD Review

    red

    Everything you’ve heard about this film is true. All the good things, anyway.

    What people who have already seen this appreciate about these films is that they all tell a great story. It’s not enough that the premise of these is that it follows the destruction left in the wake of a serial killer that terrorized a section of England in the 70’s and 80’s but it’s that you have three different directors making three different films that all feel connected in an emotional way.

    Sure, you have talent behind the lens of Anand Tucker, Julian Jarrold, and James Marsh who are all, in their own right, brilliant filmmakers making three films that could stand on their own against a lot of what Hollywood would deem a thriller, but the real power here is the performances of those tapped to make this story feel as visceral as it is.

    With actors like Sean Bean, Andrew Garfield, and even the indomitable Peter Mullan, you have actors that turn what could have simply been a mini-series on the Lifetime network a series of films that simply form a triptych of powerful proportions. For, you see, the movie is much more than just people getting murdered in two separate decades. The movie delves into the politics and corruption at the heart of a case that shatters any idealism that honest police and hardworking detectives were doing their best to find the killer that could not be found.

    We owe a lot to the power of these films in seeing how our own foibles and commonalities here in the States coincide with botched investigations and crooked cops, politicians, and government officials. Is it that this movie is a reminder that this could happen anywhere at any time, that it is a simulacrum of the many events we ourselves have witnessed being tucked gently under a rug and almost willed to forget? I would say that this movie derives its sense of evil not so much of the killer who is out hunting lambs but that there is a killer of a different sort who is a lamb himself.

    The movie is not only worth a rental but it is worth your money to go out and purchase. You should spend time watching them, jamming through them all at once like a seasonal television show just out on DVD, would spoil the intended effect of letting the questions it raises about the nature of man and his unending ability to be corrupted sink in.

    The killer is almost perfunctory to the thrill of watching who really becomes the hunted.

    About the DVD:

    Sure to be one of the cinematic events of the year, RED RIDING is a mesmerizing neo-noir epic based on factual events and adapted for the screen by Tony Grisoni (FEAR AND LOATHING IN LAS VEGAS) from David Peace’s electrifying series of novels. An official selection of the Telluride, New York, Chicago and AFI Festivals, and acclaimed by critics an eminent accomplishment, the trilogy follows several characters in intertwining storylines united by the horror wrought by the “Yorkshire Ripper,” a serial killer who terrorized northwest England in the 1970s and ’80s.The three films are directed by three notable filmmakers–Julian Jarrold (BRIDESHEAD REVISITED), Academy-Award(R)-winner James Marsh (MAN ON WIRE) and Anand Tucker (SHOPGIRL). Each boasts a stellar British cast that includes Andrew Garfield (THE IMAGINARIUM OF DOCTOR PARNASSUS), Sean Bean (LORD OF THE RINGS), Paddy Considine (DEAD MAN’S SHOES), Rebecca Hall (VICKY CRISTINA BARCELONA), and Peter Mullan (TRAINSPOTTING).RED RIDING – 1974 (Directed by Julian Jarrold) centers on a rookie journalist, Eddie Dunford (Andrew Garfield), whose investigation of a series of child abductions and murders leads him to suspect that there’s a terrifying connection between the perpetrators and the upper echelons of Yorkshire power.

    The Office: Season 6 -DVD Giveaway

    officeDo I think it’s right that my seven year-old knows who Michael is, that she can tell you why Dwight is the best part of the show? Further, does it make me proud that she has a vested interest in why Jim and Pam love each other?

    Not really but I really liked this season’s batch of episodes, I can tell you that. The series is most certainly evolving and this season showed a glimmer of growth that we haven’t seen in a television comedy in a long time. I know some were perturbed by some of the directions this series took this year but, and I would assert, it’s still trying new things and is constantly looking to up its game. I’m going to be there for season seven and I am hoping it again challenges what you’ve come to love about this series.

    For those wanting a chance to be ensconced in the love that is Nard Dog shoot me a line at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com and I’ll get you entered to win a hefty Season Six DVD set.

    About the DVD:

    Experience the ultimate way to enjoy “…TV’s best comedy” (Alex Pappademas, GQ), The Office, with this must-own five-disc set that includes every Season Six episode, plus an uncensored original digital short, hours of deleted scenes and much more! Follow Michael (Steve Carell), Dwight (Rainn Wilson), Jim (John Krasinski), Pam (Jenna Fischer), Ryan (B.J. Novak), Andy (Ed Helms) and the rest of the Scranton crew as they pursue new heights of inappropriateness while facing everything from new romances, marriage and parenthood to new ownership, Darryl’s (Craig Robinson) rise to middle management and a ball-busting new boss! Developed for American television by Primetime Emmy® Award winner Greg Daniels, “The Office is so funny it hurts” (Joanna Weiss, The Boston Globe)!

    Robin Hood – DVD Giveaway

    robinA movie that showed the kind of grit and dirt that ought to have been there all along, Robin Hood was a pleasant surprise.

    The trailers didn’t sell the movie well so it’s great that the world will now be able to see that this was a movie worth your time. Russell Crowe is actually a great Robin, those who want to talk about Kevin Costner can go suck it with that mullet wig of his, and the story is a fairly compelling one that at the very least makes for a perfect movie that’s worth your rental cash.

    But you may not even have to spend any cash getting your grubby little mitts on a copy of this as I have a few sitting on my desk that need a home. If you’re interested please shoot me a note at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com and I’ll get you entered to win a copy.

    About the Movie:

    Oscar winner Russell Crowe stars as the legendary figure known by generations as “Robin Hood,” whose exploits have endured in popular mythology and ignited the imagination of those who share his spirit of adventure and righteousness. In 13th century England, Robin and his band of marauders confront corruption in a local village and lead an uprising against the crown that will forever alter the balance of world power. And whether thief or hero, one man from humble beginnings will become an eternal symbol of freedom for his people.

    The untitled Robin Hood adventure chronicles the life of an expert archer, previously interested only in self-preservation, from his service in King Richard’s army against the French. Upon Richard’s death, Robin travels to Nottingham, a town suffering from the corruption of a despotic sheriff and crippling taxation, where he falls for the spirited widow Lady Marion (Oscar winner Cate Blanchett), a woman skeptical of the identity and motivations of this crusader from the forest. Hoping to earn the hand of Maid Marion and salvage the village, Robin assembles a gang whose lethal mercenary skills are matched only by its appetite for life. Together, they begin preying on the indulgent upper class to correct injustices under the sheriff.

    With their country weakened from decades of war, embattled from the ineffective rule of the new king and vulnerable to insurgencies from within and threats from afar, Robin and his men heed a call to ever greater adventure. This unlikeliest of heroes and his allies set off to protect their country from slipping into bloody civil war and return glory to England once more.

    The 4 Complete Ed Sullivan Shows Starring The Beatles – DVD Review

    edbeatles_approvedcoverwebWhen I went to see The Beatles LOVE, the Cirque du Soliel Vegas production, I was a marginal fan.

    I would support anyone’s assertion that they were the band that changed the face of music but I didn’t realize how deep their fan base was until I saw this show and found myself completely taken by the interpretations of dozens of the Fab Five’s classic pop singles. I immediately bought Shout!, the most comprehensive biography about the band, bought a few new collections of their material and I have been living in the 60’s ever since.

    Lo and behold this makes its way to my door and I could not have been more thrilled. Here was a time capsule of true television, of when these four guys just decimated a teenage population and ignited the world.

    What you get out of watching these four shows is a taste for what was going on in pop culture at that time. Not only are we talking about the music but we also get the original commercials (!) as they ran with the show. For those of us who get a thrill out of watching commercials around the time we were all weaned in front of the boob tube this is an especially fun feature of this presentation.

    About the Beatles, however, this is a gem worth its weight in fun. Not only do we get the original performances on the show but we also get a taste for how Ed Sullivan received the quintet on his program. It was not a love fest on both sides of that relationship and, in fact, you can sense that here was a host that was darn near annoyed at the prospect of having the deal with the boys. Of the oodles of extras you get on this disc you get Sullivan interviewing them and, again, looks pained for having to do so. It’s an amazing thing to witness.

    What’s more about this DVD is that it is much more than just The Beatles playing their singles and driving everyone into a complete froth. This is a historical document, really, that shows you where the 60’s became less about the military industrial complex and became more about the youth culture that was roaring forth and claiming their identity. It’s hard not to watch these shows and not feel all of that because you can hear, hear it through your soul, that these guys were destined to be much more than just musicians.

    For sheer nostalgia alone this DVD is worth buying. For everything else, there is no doubt it would be a wonderful document to own.

    About the DVD:

    When The Beatles stepped onto Sullivan’s New York stage on Sunday, February 9, 1964, to make their American TV debut, 86 percent of all TVs on at that hour–73 million Americans–tuned in. It was the most-watched program in history to that point and remains one of the most-watched programs of all time.

    “The Beatles changed music and popular culture forever,” says Bruce Resnikoff, President & CEO, UMe . “This DVD collection contains treasured performances and UME is thrilled to bring these milestones of music and television history to fans, whether they saw the shows the first time or have never seen them.”

    “We used the full extent of today’s technology,” says Andrew Solt, Executive Producer and CEO of SOFA Entertainment, which purchased all 1,050 hours of “The Ed Sullivan Show” in 1990. “The quality is better than it ever was, in fact, better than when the shows aired, especially visually. For example, the February 16 performance was from Miami ‘s Deauville Hotel, not from a studio. The quality of the tape image was very fragile. We went back and improved it frame by frame.”

    With a running time of more than 250 minutes, The 4 Complete Ed Sullivan Shows Starring The Beatles presents those shows uncut, including not only all of the other performances but also all of the original commercials. The audio is available in both mono and a 5.1 remix. Also included on the two-DVD set will be material from other “Sullivan” shows, notably a short interview with The Beatles which has not been seen since its original television airing in 1964.

    In addition, the new DVD set has been augmented with approximately 13 minutes of additional footage. The added material, rare Beatles-related gems from other “Sullivan” shows, is placed at the end of each disc. Among them is a brief London interview with The Beatles by Sullivan which has not been seen since the day it aired (May 24, 1964); a 1966 black-and-white commercial for Beatles dolls introduced by Sullivan in color; and the host reading a 1967 telegram from The Beatles congratulating him on the renaming of the studio to “The Ed Sullivan Theater.”

    America: The Story of Us – DVD Review

    americaWe’ve talked about this before. I’m awful at history.

    One of the best things, then, about watching this series that charts America’s history from the very beginning to the 21st century this is one historical document that uses CGI in a way that helps to enhance the stodgy and stuffy videos we used to have to suffer through in grade school.The thing, as well, that makes this such a riveting 12 part series is how it incorporates academics who help couch what we’re watching and modern popular culture icons to talk about what we’re witnessing. One episode, in particular, talks about the Revolution and, through the use of multiple means of defining the moments that shaped this period in history, it’s a refresher for people like myself who want to be entertained as they learn about the bigger events of this time.

    From historical luminaries like Buzz Aldrin to pop icons like Donald Trump and Margret Cho (!) the commentary that we get from these people is much like an episode of I Love The 80’s but this time with muskets instead of Swatches. It energizes a quaint and passe method to learning about the high points of American history without getting bogged down in the reality of the time. It’s not really educational in the strictest sense of the word but who are the ones smiling now that I jammed through 12 episodes of this series? So worth the time to sit down and enjoy.

    About the DVD:

    The most in-depth television series ever produced by HISTORYâ„¢, AMERICA THE STORY OF US is the first television event in nearly 40 years to present a comprehensive telling of America’s monumental history, and the most elaborate and ambitious in the scale of its cinematic vision. And, on September 14, A&E Home Entertainment unveils this mother of all history lessons, a powerful and compelling 12-part series from the creative minds that brought us Planet Earth, featuring highly realistic CGI animation (the most ambitious CGI the network has ever applied to a historical narrative), dramatic re-creations and thoughtful insights from some of America’s most respected artists, business leaders, academics and intellectuals ““ as well as a very special introduction from President Barack Obama. For Americans of all walks, this extraordinary release will be available day-and-date on both extras-laden DVD and Blu-ray, online downloads, along with a stunning 412-page companion book containing heavily illustrated pages with over 300 full-color images, “charticles” and text.

    Making history itself as the most watched premiere in network history ““ seen by nearly 6 million viewers ““ AMERICA THE STORY OF US tells the extraordinary story of how America was invented, looking at the moments where Americans harnessed technology to advance human progress — from the rigors of linking the continent by transcontinental railroad, the internet of its day, to triumphing over vertical space through construction of steel structured buildings to putting a man on the moon. This is history with roots in the physical world: wilderness, animals, weather, and the sea, and it’s brought to amazing life firsthand through patriots, frontiersmen, slaves, abolitionists, Native Americans, pioneers, immigrants, entrepreneurs and inventors. The series is also a story of conflict ““ Native American wars, slavery, the revolutionary war that birthed the nation, the civil war that divided it and the great world wars that shaped its future and an intensive look at the forces that have shaped our nation – the people, places and things that created this most astounding country.

    Historical events covered in AMERICA THE STORY OF US include: the arrival of the first English settlers, the Revolutionary War, westward expansion, economic growth of the north and south, the Civil War, the settling of the Great Plains, the development of modern, industrialized cities, the California Gold Rush and the western frontier, the Great Depression and the Second World Wars right up to present day. And, among the breathtaking historical eras and events that have been meticulously recreated with CGI effects are a meteor that crashes through the Appalachian Mountains 300 million years ago to create the Cumberland Gap, the British Navy’s spectacular bombardment of the New York Harbor at the dawn of the Revolutionary War, New England whalers risking their lives to kill their valuable prey, the wide open western plains teeming with massive herds of buffalo, the construction of the Statue of Liberty, and the Erie Canal and transcontinental railroad that opened up central commercial routes and connected the continent together.

    Special consultants include Professors Daniel Walker Howe, David M. Kennedy and Henry Louis Gates, Jr. As well, reflecting on pivotal events in American history are some of the most respected names from the arts, letters, media, politics, business and academia who share their personal thoughts on what American history means to them, including: Brian Williams, Buzz Aldrin, Colin Powell, David Baldacci, General David H. Petraeus, Donald Trump, Michael Douglas, General Tommy Franks and many more.

    From the revolutionary war that birthed the nation to the civil war that divided it, and to the making of the modern world, AMERICA THE STORY OF US is an epic, dramatic, heartbreaking and triumphant journey that reminds us that American history truly belongs to we, the people.

    Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps

    wall-street-2-posterTrying to understand why Gordon Gekko is such a failure in this film is to understand what it is that got Wall Street firms, and the American economy, in trouble in the first place.

    It was the idea that no one would ever decipher the cipher that is the collateral debt obligation, a financial asset-backed security that ultimately proved to be utterly worthless, and that people would blindly line up to reap the benefits of its complexity. The news I have, however, is that Gordon Gekko starts off as an attractive asset whose mere presence in the marketplace should have meant security and insurance but, ultimately, costs this film its equity. It’s a metaphor, to be sure, but boy does it fit.

    Opening with Shia LaBeouf’s character, Jacob Moore, we see how the world is since the days of Gekko greed. The world has shifted from a marketplace where money was made with those who had access to not only capital but the means with which to execute to one where any Tom, Dick, or Sally with an internet connection could day trade until all they have left in the world is the computer they squandered their life savings on. Moore is much in the vein of the new guard, a kid who doesn’t mind risking everything he has on the one thing he believes to be worth something. He loses it all, of course, and this movie is all about losing. The losing of one’s self, of losing love, of losing sight on what’s important, and, more importantly, losing of one’s money.

    Moore embodies the brilliance of young money’s hopefulness and the idea that through sheer brute force money can materialize through effort and belief. And what a belief he has, this young upstart, thinking that biotech is the wave of the future, a profitable future, and thus the blinders that this young man has on his head become apparent.

    Not only does LeBeouf play a man who knowingly is dating the woman who Gordon Gekko long ago abandoned on his way to jail for white collar crimes he committed during the first Wall Street but there is a curious relationship that forms between the young trader and the freshly sprung elder statesman. Michael Douglas, as the slightly less volatile version of his former self, doesn’t feel as connected to LeBeouf in the same way as the Gekko/Fox partnership. The latter made for such a sinister snapshot, albeit entirely correct, of 80’s materialism and was a portent of the recession that would soon be on the horizon that you can see how Charlie Sheen’s Fox gets seduced by the allure of it all, how he descends into a pit of his own making.

    Here though? LeBeouf only has his stupidity to blame. There is no allure besides the green upstart of a corporation he is all but helping to bankroll out of his pocket, LeBeouf blindly doing whatever he can to keep that dream alive much to the detriment to everything around him. Carey Mulligan, as Winnie Gekko, does a wonderful job being convinced her father needs to stay out of her life and will never amount to anything more than a man who needs money to fuel his sense of self and comes across as sincere when she ditches LeBeouf in favor of staying on the liberal path of social consciousness, eschewing everything that money represents, and providing almost a ham-fisted portrait of someone for whom money means nothing.

    Ah, but it does mean something. Through a series of motions and swindles and backdoor dealings, those who deserve their comeuppance get it, ultimately, because they deserve it but it’s really Gordon who deserves the ire for why this shallow exploration of the financial crisis has about as much bite as any piece of financial regulation currently making its way though the legislature. The sad truth is that Gekko’s character is rendered inert through a series of interactions where his motivations are muddy and, the ultimate betrayal, when you can feel a writer’s hand crafting an ending that doesn’t only feel false, it’s just plain inconceivable. I’ll save you the surprise but it’s sad to see that this is how director Oliver Stone wants to end Gekko’s life on the screen. He is a man who we all know from his monologue about what pure love for power and money can do to people and has, now, shifted from a man who has a book to sell and is willing to become a shill for his own ideas about what other people are doing to your 401k or what other people are doing to your money when it should be Gekko’s turn. It’s his time to shine but he doesn’t. The movie collapses on its own wishy-washy logic and the utterly stupid convenience whereby LeBeouf is able to ultimately make his problems magically disappear, down to the precise and exact dollar amount needed, is a sign of not only lazy screenwriting but a sign of how disappointing this movie is when you consider the possibility of it all.

    There was a chance here to take men and women who are lighting $1 bills in order to fuel their cigars to task for their wholesale pillaging of the American public and how many of them still are in positions of power simply because we’re too dumb to fire them, lest these geniuses who got us into this mess leave us unable to comprehend how to undo it all, but nothing was done. Sure, Josh Brolin as Bretton James gets his but, really, does he? I would argue that he doesn’t. In a country where wealth buys you a better life, a better criminal defense, and a better world view there was nothing Oliver Stone had to say that was particularly poignant or resonant.

    The greatest indignity that we are forced to accept about his film is that a leopard can change its spots. It’s cliched as any cliche out there but Stone wants us to think it’s possible, even after the harshest reality that could be possible is magically undone, to the tune of $100 million dollars. Cliches become more prevalent as we head towards the ending of this film and it’s just a shame that instead of talking about how this film represents what’s best about a director who has let a couple of decades pass before making a sequel, we’re talking about how this represents the worst of what can happen when that same director missteps as egregiously as this.

    Gordon Gekko is an animal, a carnivore. He’s not a castrated stray as he’s portrayed here and it’s a disappointment.

  • Trailer Park: Parenthood Giveway and a Worth Reviving

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    Check out my other column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

    Parenthood – Giveaway

    parenthood_s1_fI am thankful for shows like this.

    I’m tired of the bloated guys in sitcoms with their bombshell wives, pontificating on all things funny about the human condition. I would hazard a guess that if I was 80 these kinds of things would appeal to me but they don’t. It’s shows like Parenthood that give a glimpse at the hairy underbelly that is regular life. Season 1 of Parenthood showed just how introspective you could get about the trials and tribulations of fathers, mothers, daughters and sons while also being kindhearted and likable. Peter Krause is just a dominant force, much like he was in Six Feet Under, and he proves to be just as dynamic of a presence in this series, one that I hope keeps going for many more seasons.

    For those of you who loved the first season just as much as I loved watching it, e-mail me at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com for your chance at winning season 1 on DVD. It absolutely will be worth your while as I cannot say enough about a little show that has a lot of heart, and a lot of smart writing.

    About the DVD:

    From executive producers Ron Howard Brian Grazer and Jason Katims comes the refreshingly original hit series that critics hail as “hilarious and heartbreaking” (In Touch Weekly) and “in a class of its own” (Mary McNamara Los Angeles Times). Featuring an all-star ensemble cast including Lauren Graham (Gilmore Girls) Peter Krause (Six Feet Under) Dax Shepard (Baby Mama) and Craig T. Nelson (Coach) Parenthood follows four grown siblings of the far-from-perfect Braverman clan as they try to balance kids and careers dreams and commitments and romance or a total lack thereof. Join some of the best actors on television for a genuinely funny and heartwarming journey through the most challenging and rewarding role of a lifetime: being a parent. Starring: Craig T. Nelson Lauren Graham Peter Krause

    Worth Reviving: Scorsese and Minion Play Cosmic Gods by Ray Schillaci

    51kizsw83mlSome could very well say that from 1973 to 1985 Martin Scorsese delivered us his golden years of film greats defining the very era upon their release (it was another five years before he hit his stride again with 1990’s “Goodfellas”). Imagine a resume that includes such cinematic landmarks as “Mean Streets,” “Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore,” “Taxi Driver,” the heralded documentary ““ “The Last Waltz,” “Raging Bull,” the very quirky “King of Comedy” and the much under-appreciated cult classic “After Hours”. For Scorsese to tackle the Chinese puzzle that Joseph Minion had handed him which walked the fine line of dark comedy and thriller is a feat in itself. To execute it successfully without compromising the artistic integrity over big studio mentality (Warner Bros.) was a miracle. “After Hours” was Marty walking a tightrope without a net and gleefully arriving unharmed and with tremendous applause.

    Minion’s story takes us on one ordinarily hapless man’s journey through the weird and wonderful chaos of a near inescapable night in the SoHo District that feels like a very bent version of a Twilight Zone on acid. Paul Hackett (Griffin Dunne in a very complex yet funny role) is a lonely word processor that agrees to meet with Marcy Franklin (an engaging yet whacked out performance by Rosanna Arquett before she was typed cast in these obscure character roles) in the hopes to quench his over anxious libido. But once he arrives nothing goes as planned, in fact the poor guy gets mixed up with other whack cases, criminals, psychotics, sadomasochists, punks and a misguided angry mob; wait a second ““ this almost sounds like the premise of a new Quentin Tarantino movie. But this film predates Tarantino’s relevance by nearly 10 years. That’s right, chalk up another one of QT’s influences.

    Scorsese and company bring the wrath of a damned version of Murphy’s Law to Griffin Dunne’s character and we are treated to unexpected laughs, uncomfortable dalliances and outrageous encounters that could only happen in that much maligned city known as the Big Apple. Dunne is the perfect foil after nearly stealing the movie “American Werewolf in London” with his poise and charm. It’s a wonder that he did not go further in his film acting career as time went on. His Paul is a confused mixture of sympathy, empathy and pity. Yes, we pity this poor schlub for everything he goes through just for the idea of possibly getting laid. We find ourselves hanging on to every bit of frustration the man has trying to get back home safely without having his sanity threatened at every turn.

    That’s where the fun comes in; Rosanna Arquett’s extremely alluring but vulnerable Marcy and a variety of strange and wondrous appearances by a cast that beautifully realizes every on screen moment ““ Teri Garr, Linda Fiorentino, John Heard, Will Patton, Verna Bloom, Cheech & Chong (sans the hemp), Catherine O’Hara and the indomitable Dick Miller to name a few! The gifted Griffin Dunne is extremely generous the way he bounces off the others allowing a remarkable ensemble acting coupe rarely seen on the big screen.

    Scorsese provides a deft touch for creating a pacing that is as unsettling as it is damningly funny. His direction always feels like it is going to jump into a manic phase and go unhinged, but it never quite goes that far (thank you). The closest he gets is a Mohawk night at an exclusive punk rock club and Marty himself plays the man running the spotlight in control in an out of control situation. But it’s not just the outrageous set pieces that Minion’s story supplies, subtleties abound making the film all the more enjoyable with each viewing.

    Beyond the story, pacing and a delightful score by Howard Shore, Scorsese knows where the real power is and that belongs to his performers. From the leather-clad gay guys to the window dressing that we witness via Griffin Dunne’s character; people wildly humping, spousal abuse and obscure conversations heard through walls. Scorsese has a ball with the weirdness of it all and invites us to play along. If this film had been done today, the studio would have taken the ball back and the film might never have seen the light of day.

    This is definitely made for those who have a warped sense of humor. It kind of reminds one of viewing Sasha Baron Cohen or Tom Green for the first time. But with a skill set as sharp as a ginsu knife. No matter how you slice it, Scorsese provides another side to his talent that few have seen.

  • Trailer Park: Yael Hersonski

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    Check out my other column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

    Yael Hersonski- Interview

    Just when you thought that everything has been unearthed about what happened to Jews in the holocaust filmmaker Yael Heronski unearths documentary footage, shot by Nazis, about life in a Warsaw ghetto. It was mere months before this very same ghetto would be purged of its residents, the remainder still around shipped off and sent to their certain death.

    a_film_unfinishedWhat Heronski found in the footage that was once thought complete, the movie on display here showing the lengths to which the Nazis wanted to craft their own narrative that stretched the truth about what was happening inside these claustrophobic walls of half a million Jews that were contained within 3 square miles. From retakes that had poor, starving children looking just as forlorn and despondent as they did the first time they were put in front of the camera to the indignities that women had to suffer as their nude bodies were objects to be film and exploited, as if they were cattle to be assessed, are things of nightmares. Yael wanted to make a movie that went beyond outrage, to showcase the pure and unrepentant horror that were these men who took this film, and she did exactly that.

    Praised with reviews from the New York Times and the Los Angeles Times this is no ordinary documentary about the atrocities of an army bent on complete ethnic cleansing, this is a singular portrait that embodies the kind of inhumane and cruelty man is capable of. It may very well be presumptuous to say this is the kind of film that belongs in history classes everywhere but it does. It’s a historical document that cuts through the Hollywood glamorization of a time that time would like to forget but never will.

    Oscilloscope Laboratories, the production company putting out A Film Unfinished and headed by Beastie Boy Adam Yauch, recently gave the MPAA a piece of its mind when the rating body saddled the film with an R rating. A sad decision that prompted Yauch to respond: “This is too important of a historical document to ban from classrooms. While there’s no doubt that Holocaust atrocities are displayed, if teachers feel their students are ready to understand what happened, it’s essential that young people are given the opportunity to see this film. Why deny them the chance to learn about this critical part of our human history? I understand that the MPAA wants to protect children’s eyes from things that are too overwhelming, but they’ve really gone too far this time. It’s bullshit.”

    Yael spoke with me last week and we talked about the film which is now open in New York and Los Angeles and will be opening wide as the weeks roll on.

    Check out the movie’s official site for release dates about when it will be coming to a theater near you.

    Senior Programmer David Courier (L) and Director Yael HersonskiCHRISTOPHER STIPP:  Thank you for fitting me into your schedule.  You are probably all sorts of busy.

    YAEL HERSONSKI: Given that I am leaving on Sunday, I am trying to use every minute here.

    CS:  I just read what the New York Times had to say about the movie.  That must be very uplifting.

    HERSONSKI: Yes.  I was very fortunate to have this kind of a review.

    CS:  I would like to just get right into it and talk about, now that the finished product is now out and people are responding to it in a positive way, how did you approach this project and how were you the one to put this together?

    HERSONSKI: I think it was after I decided to do a project on the Holocaust not only because of the Holocaust’s inhumanity and inconceivable horror but mainly because it’s marked the beginning of the systematic documentation of the Ghetto.  I thought of it also as a case study of the images we’re bombarded with today.  I think there is a kind of numbness today and we cannot emotionally digest what we are actually seeing.  We are watching, but I don’t think we want to see anymore.

    I was thinking, too, of where it all started and I think it all started there, at the point of documentation.  Then I decided to approach one of the most prominent film producers in Israel, of documentary films, and he gave me a list of footage I should watch.  To just watch and try to understand the most familiar footage they used.  And that film was among them.  And when I saw it, I was shocked.  I literally experienced a kind of anxiety not only because of the images but also because I knew some of them and saw them in so many other films I was never able to understand what I was seeing because it was out of the full context.  Have you seen the film?

    CS:  Yes, I have.

    HERONSKI: OK, so the scene in which you see the naked women going into the ritual bath, at the Polish museum they called the footage “Ritual Bath.”.  I thought it is hard to believe for me today but when I saw it then I couldn’t realize how anxious and terrorized and terrified these women were because it was titled like an objective documentation of real life inside the ghetto.  Being able to see the whole sequence, however, I suddenly saw much more.  It was the same image but I couldn’t and didn’t realize that these women were having something very close to an anxiety attack and they had a good reason because they were naked and surrounded by uniformed men who were pointing cameras at them.  It was a terrifying experience and I think in learning about how these images were made shifts the place of the horror to its real place.

    CS:  And that leads into something I was going to talk to you about.  I know there are moments in the film where moments are done again, and again, and again, and to my eye I can’t see what they were doing so many takes for. It’s as if they were obsessing over a shot they wanted to get perfect.  Did you try and understand the actual filmmaking process of what they were obsessing about?

    filmunfinishedHERSONSKI: I have no idea.  Eventually when we see the children just gazing at the window shop of the meat store that’s all they had to do was just stare.  Period.  We had something like seven takes of this same action.  I don’t know what their problem was.  Maybe the lighting was not satisfying.  I have no idea.  But one thing is clear here.  This is one of the most amazing moments I read in the protocols of the Nazis with the camermen.  It was written in German so I read it slowly.  “It was very difficult for us to shoot this film…”Â  And I’m sure, at this point, I’m going to read an emotional confession and the next line is, “because we didn’t have enough lighting equipment.”Â  It was difficult because they didn’t have enough film equipment.

    These guys were occupied with the lighting and all the small details on how to make the shot and just not to see ““ the ability to see the ability to watch something – but not do see.  Inside the ghetto they were filming but they are not realizing, not able to realize what it is they are perpetrating.

    CS:  And it strikes me, you talked about it earlier, their preoccupation with something that was completely irrelevant ““ the level of suffering at their own hands ““ that they are meting out.  The men who film this are just completely numb to what they’re doing and I think it’s almost that you can just extrapolate it to the larger picture of Nazism in general. I am just astounded that they were able to do this without any sort of moral hesitation ““ for lack of a better word.

    HERSONSKI: I think it’s such a different situation that we not only know, but can imagine, that I preferred not to judge the cameraman ““ not to judge what he is saying because the protocols are what they are.  I didn’t change one comma, one word, from what he was saying in the very strange phrasing in German that he used.  I don’t know and I don’t want to guess what he knew or didn’t know or whether he realized what he was doing while doing that and what he realized just after the war.  I just don’t know.

    I guess that if it was not conscious that he’s part of something ““ if it was not in his conscious level, maybe a subliminal – because in fact, after the war, he did change his profession and he was driving to the east to the film archive.  Somehow he managed to find his own cameraman, take all his reels, and took them home and burned it.  This is not a series of actions of someone who feels innocent.  I feel that they cannot understand the reality of living inside the ghetto, therefore I won’t bother even to imagine how it feels to film there.  But for me what was quite astonishing to think about was the fact that 1942 was one of the last years of the ghetto and was one of the most horrendous.  100,000 people died from hunger and diseases and you could see buildings that were full of families really enduring hell.

    The reality is that some of this is documented in film like raw material for their own audience.  The action of filming.  It was one of the most extreme examples of propaganda filmmaking.  I don’t think it’s completely alien from contemporary filmmaking that we practice as it is an art skill.  When the war was over people laughed and when people stopped suffering around the world we moved on.  Easily, I can tell you we live in such an area.  The filmmakers documenting the suffering of the Palestinians for a long time are doing so now and I’m trying to understand what does it mean to go to the occupied territories to document suffering of others and go back to your comfortable life.

    What does that mean?  Many films actually make their point but it doesn’t change the fact that people are still suffering.  So I am just raising questions, I don’t have answers.

    CS:  Is that frustrating as a documentarian or is this just part of the job to raise the questions and not really answer them?

    HERSONSKI: I have a very interesting confession with one of the filmmakers that I appreciate the most in Israel.  He’s also a political activist and when we were talking about that we came to the conclusion that making films and being an activist cannot be the same thing.  Not being an activist by making films.  Making films is a visual way of thinking about the world, and reality, in a very deep manner.  It’s probably the most complex medium we have, to make something about our perception of reality but it’s not about making a change.

    filmunfinished2CS:  And that’s interesting because I know there are some documentarians out there who use this form as a platform to push their own theories, theses, as they have an idea of how the world looks and craft that as they see fit.  I think this is one of the reasons why this film works is because it doesn’t demonize ““ it literally takes the risk of showing the events as they happened and to let the horror speak for itself.  It’s a risk I think some filmmakers have taken and I think you did it as well.  That must have just clawed at you, you must have wanted to make some kind of comment about the filmmakers and where they were coming from.

    HERSONSKI: Yes.  That’s exactly what I was trying to do and not to do; trying not to be on the front page because something which is so much more complex and real speaks for itself that I could have very easily done that.  I thought making this film which I thought was first collecting lots of materials and then discovering them and I felt that there was something here that needs to be told but my part here is to be a storyteller and not more than that.  It’s a story that shed light on the way we tell stories, let’s put it that way.  So I feel I have done my part in collecting the pieces but not more than that.

    CS:  And if I could ask you just one more question before I let you go, bringing in the survivors of the ghetto to watch the film, one at a time. That was obviously a tough moment for all involved as you probably didn’t know what kind of reaction you would get.  How was that build-up when you knew that was going to happen?  Did you have anything in mind of how you wanted things to go or was it really just, “Let’s show them the film and just get their reaction”?

    HERSONSKI: It was exhausting, difficult, and mysterious. I knew it during filmmaking.  It was something that became my nightmares before I did it.  Because I knew of the survivors and know how little we know about what they went through.  It was extremely difficult for me to ask them to do that.

    First of all, I wanted them to know exactly what it was about.  They could not imagine it themselves because they didn’t know what the footage was but I explained to them.  I didn’t want to intensify the experience of being confronted with these images as much as I could.  As well, I knew they wouldn’t have a second chance to see the footage not because they wouldn’t be able to show up again but you wouldn’t want to show this footage to these people again.  We have one chance here and if you blow it up it is your business.  I really wanted to make sure that they saw these images and commented on them in the best way they could.  These people, it was hard for them to see the uniform.

    I explained to them, upfront, and those who were hesitating to do it or not I said we prefer they don’t come.  The ones who had hesitations had good reasons to hesitate.  At the moment I heard them hesitate I said, “OK, I prefer not to do it.”Â  Those who came were the ones who really insisted to do it.  Felt great urgency to do it.  And felt also that their own personal task to have the final word here over the images because they were the only ones that are alive, that are actually hiding from that film crew, and when we see these images we can’t imagine them several meters away and to have the opportunity to watch these images from a such different perspective.  After more than 70 years it is an overwhelming situation.  I am speaking here on my own behalf.  Of course, I didn’t want to torture them too much, they saw the film, we talked about 30 minutes maybe one hour, there was one woman that was stronger than the others and that’s it.  And they wanted to see it again.  The finished film, edited.  They did come to the screenings and were quite touched by the result.

    CS:  It’s a film that I think should be required viewing.

    HERSONSKI: Thank you so much.

  • Trailer Park: Innocence Mission

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    Check out my other column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

    Innocence Mission- Interview

    I remember taking a cab when I lived in the city of Chicago to see The Innocence Mission in 2006. It was a cold night, and they were playing a small club, but I couldn’t have been more excited. The band was riding a small wave of popularity with a couple of singles, most notably Bright As Yellow which became ubiquitous as their signature song around this time. Meeting them after the show was done I was struck with how disaffected they were with popularity. Meeting lead singer Karen Peris and talking with her I’ll never forget simply because of how low-key and genial she was, the moment captured with a ballpoint autograph on a CD single I brought with me.

    Her personality is the person you hear coming through the speakers  and as they went from playing clubs to touring with Natalie Merchant when she broke from the 10,000 Maniacs they never conformed to any logic that dictated that you needed to change your “sound” with every progressive release. It’s almost a cliche at this point to hear how bands say “this” release is a real departure for them or that the band has never sounded better. But with every album Innocence Mission has released since 1995, 6 albums in total, they’ve kept things just as they’ve always been. With a sound that has been compared to The Sundays, I would say they possess a sound that is wholly their own. With an emphasis with muted percussion and deft guitar work, with Karen’s vocals languidly smoothing everything out, they are neither folk nor are they easy listening. The newest album out now, My Room in the Trees, is a testament to their power as a group that produces catchy, low-key songs that embody everything good about what’s possible with modern music that evokes the music you would play on a rainy morning or a gentle Sunday afternoon spent relaxing. The band answered some questions I submitted about their process and what it has been like to be together over two decades.

    My Room in the Trees is available now.

    my-room-in-the-trees-web1CHRISTOPHER STIPP: What drives you to keep putting out albums? Many bands from the mid-90’s who had some popularity are all but extinct yet you keep producing quality material.

    THE INNOCENCE MISSION: It is really just a love of music, and an on-going searching for ways to express things that can’t really be expressed.  Also it’s partly because of the kind letters we’ve received that we keep recording the songs and sharing them out loud. Otherwise I think I would just sings the songs to myself. But this way, it is like joining in a conversation with other people. That’s the way it feels to me, anyway.

    CS: Does age slow your desire to play live? I saw you on a few dates during Natalie Merchant’s solo tour many many years ago and I recently found myself hoping you would get out of the house more often.

    TIM: Well, not really age, as much as circumstance.  Not wanting to leave our kids made me take a long break from touring, and then, maybe because of not using it in that way,  my voice has sort of un-adapted itself to singing for long periods of time.  Performing is a whole other discipline, so different from writing.  The thing I miss is being able to meet and be with such kind people in different places. It really was a privilege that I enjoyed for a lot of years.  Maybe we can do concerts again someday.

    CS: The creative process. Has it gotten easier with the band being together for as long as it has? I would assume that the well you go to for inspiration constantly changes but are you finding there is always something new to write about?

    TIM: Yes, I think there is always a lot to write about. But I am not always as aware of  this.  And then some days I feel that I want to try to  write about every small aspect of a single moment, I get excited about words,  about trying to see the words, and  mapping out poems. It goes like that. Music is different, though. Music is more immediately discoverable. It is almost always easy to become absorbed in composing something new.

    CS: The actual recording process. Some people go to exotic locations, mess with the physical ways they lay down tracks, work with an arcane producer who is convinced they can get “something new” out of the band, but you don’t seem to share any of those notions. Do you have favorite method when you have a batch of songs that need recording?

    TIM: We used to travel to record and that was nice, too.  But recording at home has been better for our music, I think.  It is just us here, in our studio, and so we can take the time to really hear and to try to do our best with every song.  I don’t know if I have a favorite method, other than thinking that just about every song should have pump organ on it.

    CS: Is there an Innocence Mission sound? I hear many bands talk about wanting to reinvent themselves after album, after album but you’ve, delightfully, stayed consistent. Do you ever feel pressure that you should change it up?

    mission-2010_2TIM: Well,  we really don’t think about the songs in that way. We don’t talk about changing or not changing.  We just try to strive for the sounds that we’re hearing for each song.  The first two albums are dramatically different from what we’ve made over the last twelve years or so, since Birds of My Neighborhood.   It took a little while for us to find our way.

    CS: The world consumes music differently than it did when you first came onto the scene. Do you see people’s shifting methods to getting music as a benefit to where you are today or are you finding yourselves on the outside looking in because of how fractured the marketplace is? Has it even mattered to you at all, the business of getting your music out into the world?

    TIM: I have to admit, I don’t really think about it that much.  I do see that new music in general is more accessible to everyone now, which is great.

    CS: What does it take to stay together in a band like this? Is it easy for a group best known for its delicate arrangements? I would imagine any fighting is done politely and with the kind of manners usually reserved for those at a swanky dinner party.

    TIM: That’s funny.  Well, we don’t usually have fights about music. And if we do, it’s always Don’s fault. (Kidding). Working together on recordings has always been such a big part of our friendship and marriage. It’s not something I have to question, but I am grateful for it.

    CS: This album in particular, what was the impetus for making it? Was there any great event that hurried you into the studio or was it a slow, progressive build-up of material?

    TIM: It was just the enjoyment of writing and making the recordings. It does seem to take a long while to have a group of songs that we still feel close to over time.  But that’s okay. It always seems better not to be in too much of a hurry to finish a record.

    CS: What are your hopes for the future of this band? Do you see yourselves continuously putting out new material every now and then?

    TIM: I hope to be able to keep writing.   I hope the songs will be worthy of sharing. That’s about it.

  • Trailer Park: TAPPED, THE GOOD, BAD AND THE WEIRD, VINCERE, ART OF THE STEAL

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    Check out my other column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

    CENTURION Blu-Ray Six Shooter Giveaway!

    centurian-finalWhat I love about modern film distribution is that first-run films are sometimes available to see in your house before you’re able to see them in the theater. Such is the case with Neil Marshall and Michael Fassbender’s newest film, CENTURION, which is currently available on VOD, XBOX, VUDU and Amazon.com. Now, CENTURION also opens in theaters August 27, 2010 if you care to see it with a bunch of other like minded individuals but I am thrilled to see that the models of getting movies to people how they want, when they want, are evolving.

    In honor of CENTURION’s recent premiere on VOD, XBOX, Playstation, VUDU and Amazon, I want to offer one of you readers a Six Shooter Blu-Ray prize pack including some of this year’s best international action releases: ONG-BAK 2, RED CLIFF and BRONSON! These independent films represent a true sampling of some of the best indie work that doesn’t involve emo introspection. It’s always a thrill to see filmmakers making their mark and these movies are no exception.  Shoot me an e-mail at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com to get entered.

    Check out CENTURION on Facebook: facebook.com/centurionmovie

    Good Luck!

    About the film:

    117. The Roman Empire stretches from Egypt to Spain, and East as far as the Black Sea. But in northern Britain, the relentless onslaught of conquest has ground to a halt in face of the guerrilla tactics of an elusive enemy: the savage and terrifying tribes known as the Picts.

    Quintus, sole survivor of a Pictish raid on a Roman frontier fort, marches north with General Virilus’ legendary NinthLegion, under orders to wipe the Picts from the face of the earth and destroy their leader Gorlacon.

    But when the legion is ambushed on unfamiliar ground, and Virilus taken captive, Quintus faces a desperate struggle to keep his small platoon alive behind enemy lines, evading remorseless Pict pursuers over harsh terrain, as the band of soldiers race to rescue their General, and to reach the safety of the Roman frontier.

    From writer/director, Neil Marshall, CENTURION is a gripping survival thriller set against a background of conquest and invasion; a pursuit movie in the vein of Deliverance, Last of the Mohicans and Apocalypto.

    TAPPED – DVD Review

    tapped1There was always the sense that leaving my plastic water bottles in the sun weren’t the best thing to do.

    To say that I had concerns about the leeching of slowly cooking plastic all the time would be a lie but it wasn’t until I watched this documentary on the big business of bottled water that I changed my behavior. A film that explores, with a thundering assault of facts and figures, the correlation between nature’s most basic beverage and a litany of problems, both health and environmental, is a fabulous film.

    What separates this film from any other documentary that takes a lackadaisical approach to its advocacy journalism director Stephanie Soechtig makes a bold debut in connecting the dots between political and commercial interests who want to control the manufacture and distribution of something that seems so inert. Soechtig doesn’t pull any narrative punches and essentially lays it all out for people to see how the water they are so quick to buy can sometimes have a tumultuous origin. From towns that have literally been siphoned of their water to government regulators who essentially aren’t regulating this doc is brisk and absolutely powerful.

    If nothing else this film affirms my belief in switching to a reusable, aluminum container for my agua.

    About the film:

    Is access to clean drinking water a basic human right, or a commodity that should be bought and sold like any other article of commerce? From the producers of Who Killed the Electric Car and I.O.U.S.A, TAPPED — the feature-film debut of TV documentarian Stephanie Soechtig — is a timely, behind-the-scenes look into the unregulated and unseen world of an industry that aims to privatize and sell back the one resource that ought never to become a commodity: our water.  Making its DVD debut in an extras-laden edition, TAPPED will be available to the environmentally-conscious and doc aficionados alike on August 10 for $19.98srp.

    “I quit drinking bottled water years ago, but now I have the perfect teaching tool with this film to convince my friends to give up the bottle.  Tapped illustrates quite clearly how we’ve been getting ‘soaked’ for years by the bottled water industry.”
    — Ed Begley Jr.

    A couple of eye-opening facts about the business of water in our country: each year, Americans buy 29 billion single-serve bottles of water.  To transport that water, we use over 18 million barrels of oil.  And, in 2007, water was an $11.5 billion business.  From the production of petrochemical-based plastics to the fragile ocean in which so many of these bottles end up, this inspiring ““ and often shocking — documentary trails the path of the bottled water industry and the communities which were the unwitting chips on the table.  A powerful and highly compelling portrait of the lives affected by the bottled water industry, this revelatory film features those caught at the intersection of big business and the public’s right to water.

    A multiple award-winner including “Best of Fest” at the Colorado Environmental Film Festival, an IndieFest Award of Excellence and “Gold Kahuna Award Winner” at the 2010 Honolulu International Film Festival, TAPPED, presented by Disinformation in widescreen (1.78:1), is overflowing with bonus features including the additional featurettes: “Central Valley and Agriculture”, “Chemicals in the Water”, “Infrastructure”, “OC Water”, “Oil and Water”, “Privatization” and “World Water Crisis”.

    VINCERE – DVD Review

    vincereSo, how would you explain why anyone should be interested in a movie about a woman who once bedded fascist Benito Mussolini, had a kid by him, and then was ditched as the madman gained prominence in Italy? “Just see it” would be my refrain.

    The film is a moving and stirring story of a relationship that is beset with so much grief you can’t help but be moved by the passion that is displayed between actors Giovanna Mezzogiorno and Filippo Timi as the couple that just would not fizzle. What is most interesting about the film isn’t so much that we get to see what Mussolini was like before he became the tyrannical madman we’ve all come to know in the history books but it’s that we get to see a side of him that is at once exactly what we thought and nothing what we expect.

    Director Marco Bellocchio brilliantly avoids the traps usually associated with period pieces that want to capture the reality of the time, Bellocchio captures the essence of the time between these two people. While a story between a man and a woman, the woman who should have known to pull back a little bit in order to avoid being snuffed out entirely, that seemed  doomed from the beginning doesn’t seem all that compelling I assure you that it is. The lengths that Mussolini goes in order to deal with this entire situation is worth the price of purchase alone. The historical context we’re given, honestly, is a bit thin seeing how much information we’re not really given about a truly historical figure but it’s the relationship, the story of these two, that makes this film entirely worth watching.

    About the film:

    A cinematic tour-de-force, VINCERE is the story of the passion and power that consumed Italian dictator Benito Mussolini’s personal life, directed by Italian master Marco Bellocchio (FISTS IN THE POCKET, MY MOTHER’S SMILE, GOOD MORNING NIGHT).

    Since debuting to overwhelming praise in Competition at the Cannes Film Festival and a hit at the box office in  Italy, VINCERE has been one of the most buzzed about films including screening in several prestigious festivals:  the New York Film Festival; the Toronto Film Festival; the Telluride Film Festival; the AFI Festival; and the Chicago International Film Festival, where it received the Silver Hugo Jury Award for Best Director, Best Actress for Giovanna Mezzogiorno, Best Actor for Filippo Timi and Best Cinematography for Daniele Cipri.  In addition, Filippo Timi recently received a European Film Award nomination for Best European Actor.

    A vivid full-blooded political melodrama, VINCERE chronicles the largely unknown story of the secret marriage of Mussolini (Filippo Timi) to Ida Dalser (Giovanna Mezzogiorno), a woman whom Il Duce met when he was a rising star in the Socialist movement. Inspired by the intensity of his beliefs and the ferocious attraction between them, Dalser sells off all of her belongings to fund the newspaper that would eventually launch his political career. After bearing him a son, Dalser discovers to her horror, that Mussolini already has another family — and he will do anything in his power to keep her away from them.

    Written and Directed by Marco Bellocchio, VINCERE stars Giovanna Mezzogiorno and Filippo Timi.  The film is produced by Mario Gianani, Christian Baute, and Hengameh Panahi, and executive produced by Olivia Sleiter.

    ART OF THE STEAL – DVD Review

    the-art-of-the-stealQuick, what’s the Barnes Foundation?

    One of the things you will learn about an art collection that is valued well over $25 billion is that it is one of the biggest art collections the world you’ve never heard of. From sculptures to paintings the Foundation houses some of the most priceless pieces of work from artists like Renoir and Picasso. You can hardly believe that this was in control of one man who explicitly detailed his wishes for the collection to stay out of the hands of the hoi-polloi, art snobs in Philadelphia who would have no doubt wanted this to become a part of the city’s artistic offerings when Albert Barnes himself passed. Well, he did pass, and his will was pretty specific that his wishes for this collection of art be left alone where it was.

    What happened after the corpse got cold is insanely curious. From all kinds of intrigue of politicians doing their best to move the collection, hucksters vying for the opportunity to wrest it away from the pastoral location it’s currently residing in (you would be surprised where $25 plus billion dollars worth of art is sitting at the moment) you see how some people will do anything they can to get what they want and not care who gets in their way to do it. It outrages you, it asks great questions about ownership of a collection this size and what it means to those who could benefit from enjoying it,  but it also entertains. As a documentary this film lets you form your own opinion on a story that doesn’t seem like it would be all that interesting but when we think of all the films about art thieves I bet you never thought you would see one where the thieves are hiding in plain sight.

    Do not miss this one. If the premise alone isn’t enough for you to buy it go and rent it tonight. It’ll change the way you think about what ownership really means.

    About the film:

    The Intriguing and Provocative Behind-the-Scenes Story of the Battle for Some of the World’s Greatest Paintings Arrives on DVD This July

    It may be unknown to most people, but in the art world, the Barnes Foundation is a legendary repository of some of the finest paintings ever produced. The documentary THE ART OF THE STEAL tells how the private museum’s holdings have become the focus of a bitter, decades-long battle involving artists, politicians and powerful philanthropists. THE ART OF THE STEAL reveals how this private collection of paintings became the envy of the Louvre, the Metropolitan Museum of Art and other major institutions ““ and the prize in a battle between one man’s vision and the forces of commerce and politics.

    THE GOOD, THE BAD, THE WEIRD – DVD Review

    good-bad-weird_2d_hAbsolutely, one of the most entertaining films I’ve seen all year.

    Director Kim Ji-Woon may not be a name everyone is familiar with but the Korean filmmaker has crafted a movie that’s straight out of the 1800’s, absolutely aping the style of Sergio Leone but with a playful twist, this movie about a treasure map and the lengths the three main players involved will go to secure it is nothing but unbridled fun that’s set in the Manchurian Desert sometime in the 1930’s.

    What made this such an enjoyable experience is Ji-Woon’s cinematic style. Wanting to capture the majesty of the desert, saturating the screen with some of the loveliest blues you’ll ever see, incorporating some truly gonzo gun battles that defy any and all logic, this film can be seen as a cinematic homage to movies that simply aren’t made anymore. You have serious action packed in with Three Stooges-like slapstick, all the while keeping you solidly connected to what’s happening.

    Ji-Woon can take a wide, panoramic vantage point of a desert that seems endless but he also knows how to get in close, literally, to the players who we have to care about in some fashion, otherwise this becomes another film with gun play and obnoxiousness. That’s avoided completely with the film just being true all the way though with the way it has decided to capture the story. It’s one that we think we’ve seen before but it’s conveyed through fresh eyes and a lens that lovingly recreates in the 2000’s that film lovers loved when Leone did it decades ago. It’s just bringing a different aesthetic to the table and in a land cluttered with warmed over retreads I welcome any originality. See this film.

    About the film:

    FROM GENRE MASTER KIM JI-WOON COMES THE WILD KOREAN WESTERN/MARTIAL ARTS ACTION COMEDY THAT TAKES NO PRISONERS

    Imagine an action adventure about Chinese bandits directed in the superheated spaghetti Western style of Sergio Leone and you have THE GOOD, THE BAD, THE WEIRD, a breathtakingly exciting spectacle from South Korea.

    Director Kim Ji-woon, a master of modern horror thanks to A Tale of Two Sisters and 3 Extremes II, turns to pure, high-octane thrills in this wild take on Leone’s Clint Eastwood classic The Good, The Bad and the Ugly. One of the most expensive films ever made in South Korea, critics worldwide have been blown away by this outlandishly thrilling spectacle. A treat for fans of everything from action Westerns to Korean cinema to Tarantino-style bravado, it comes to Blu-ray and DVD from IFC Films and MPI Media Group on August 17, 2010.

  • Trailer Park: George Gallo of MIDDLE MEN – Part 1

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    Check out my other column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

    GEORGE GALLO – Interview

    One of the most thrilling things you get to do when you’re in a position to see a film very, very early is knowing that whatever you are feeling about the experience of seeing that movie, is pure. Pure because you are not tainted by the pool of public opinion or subconsciously projecting someone’s off-handed comment onto your own. It’s devoid of judgment and expectation and watching a movie like Middle Men, with a crowd that only knew that it starred Luke Wilson, who hasn’t given such a dynamic performance since The Royal Tennenbaums, Giovanni Ribisi, a complete terror who delightfully and shamelessly steals every scene he’s in, and James Caan, who lets loose in one the more engaging roles in recent memory, you realize just how fun it is to go to the movies.

    Middle Men is a production you never saw coming in a month usually reserved for the detrius of summer because it is just a rock solid film and one brimming with character. It is hilarious, dark, unnerving, and is the reason why talkies that don’t deal in superheroes or have budgets that swell into straospheric heights can still inspire that sense you’re in the presence of great filmmaking. To wit, a large part of that should be credited to writer and director George Gallo who many will remember as the writer behind Midnight Run and, still one of my personal favorites in the 90’s, Bad Boys.

    To hear Gallo talk is to hear a man who really should be teaching how to make a movie from the ground up. Forget about the nascent ramblings of stuffy shirted old men who want to talk about making movies in a way that makes the process seem filled with pomposity, Gallo is chock full of stories that make you want to put down the voice recorder and just listen to a man who has navigated decades within a business that delights in chewing and spitting out talent like obese midwesterners at a Sizzler. He’s a joy, a fascinating player in a game he’s very much still a part of and, based on the film in question, still full of good ideas and is on point behind the lens. There’s no question he belongs in this business because he’s both a realist and man undeterred by the barriers that have stopped lesser creative types.

    My only wish after talking with the man was wanting to be in the position to take the man out for a drink, to have him talk about what it means to be a survivor in Hollywood, to hear what it takes to be relevant for a market that seems so fragmented thanks to the multitude of entertainment options an audience has at its disposal. He’s one of a kind, a man capable of crafting a fine film about porn and commerce, and there wouldn’t be anyone else I’d rather listen to all day than this man. Here’s to hoping he’ll consider being a mentor to those who have logenevity on the brain, to someday be as accomplished as he is.

    MIDDLE MEN opens today and tune in next week for Part 2 where George talks about his thoughts on a much ballyhooed Midnight Run sequel, what it took to get it made, and much more.

    middle_men_posterGEORGE GALLO: Hello.

    CHRISTOPHER STIPP: Hello George.

    GALLO: Christopher. What’s up, buddy?

    CS: What’s happening?

    GALLO: I’ve been trying to take it easy. I’ve been working so much and writing so much my brain is kind of mush.

    (Laughs)

    So, I’m trying to take it easy which is something I don’t know how to do in general but I’m doing my best to try and sit still and get some exercise and that kind of thing and not think about this person talks to that person and this person reacts over that person and then they can say this and they can say that and they can go here and they can go there”¦I just don’t want to think about it right now if that’s OK.

    (Laughs)

    CS: Well, are you are on any sort of schedule or regimen?

    GALLO: Oh yeah. Generally I get up real early, like 6:00, 6:30, and then I start writing at about 7:00. Sometimes we go all day, literally all day. And that’s 5 days a week. I’m always writing something.

    CS: How has that been? The last time I talked to you was for Local Color and now it’s for Middle Men. I look at your directorial filmography and compared to guys who want to knock out a film a year you’re very selective, yet you are intensely prolific with your writing. Do you write with the intent to make everything that you put to paper?

    GALLO: No, I don’t. A lot of times I, because I started out as a writer and I still ““ I helped a lot of friends out. A lot of times I’ll write things to help friends that are directors out that I don’t even get credit on, you know? I am going to probably start something for Andy Davis now, you know. He’s a buddy and I’ll do about three weeks of a project for him. But I need a week off before I start it. To be honest with you some of it was by choice and some of it wasn’t by choice. I know I’m sort of a mainstream guy, but to be honest with you I never thought of perceived myself as that. There’s Hollywood movies that are the classic mainstream fast ball down the middle. Other than maybe Bad Boys, and even Midnight Run to me was sort of left handed. I never considered myself that mainstream down the middle. So a lot of those projects to me are kind of boring. They just sort of ““ not that I’m above making money ““ I’m not saying that ““ but I don’t know, they seem sort of boring to me and I just like something that has a little more teeth in it. And, like I say, I’ve written a few things that were commercial ““ not that I have a problem with it ““ it just takes so much time and energy to write a screen play and especially if you are directing the movie that when you are all done with it, hopefully, you won’t feel stupid that you spent that much time on it.

    (Laughs)

    It takes a long time. I still really care about this stuff. I have friends who make a lot more money than I do and they don’t care nearly as much as I do. I think some people just resign themselves to the fact that it’s a business and they see it more as a business than I do.

    CS: It’s funny you mention that. I have been at events, press lines, what have you, in L.A. and what have you, but here in Phoenix when Middle Men was closing out the Phoenix Film Festival you had this dichotomy of these straitlaced, suburban couples with those in your entourage. It seemed to be the epitome of people who look very nice, very tan, very beautiful ““ there were dozens of them. It struck me that this business seems to be built on this cavalcade which includes showy, flamboyant, “Let’s go where the party is” kind of attitude. Is this ritual of the entourages, the hangers on, all that, just second nature to you, is it background noise at this point in your career?

    GALLO: I’ll be honest with you, it’s funny that what you saw was a rare occurrence for me because I don’t ““ people who see me do this say I do it very well but I’m a true couch potato.

    (Laughs)

    And my wife and I don’t like to go anywhere ““ which in some ways has gotten in the way of me making other films or making bigger films or whatever but I like to come home ““ she cooks, we eat dinner, we watch TV and shout at the television quite a bit. We rarely go out. This last year has been different because I don’t even like to fly. We flew to Cannes the year before, for Middle Men, that’s where it premiered, world premiere, and it was received really well. I’m happy that the movie has a very positive buzz and, yes, I’ve been going to a lot more of those types of things. But in general, I have to tell you, dude, my friends on the technical side of filmmaking, like editors and directors and stuff like that, cameramen ““ I like to hit golf balls at the driving range. I’m just not big on the circuit thing. I’ve never been that great at it.

    CS: Let’s talk about the film a little bit. When I watched it I really know what to expect but I was surprised that I haven’t heard more about a movie made as well as this one.

    GALLO: I’m so proud of this movie.

    CS: To even look at it ““ I think your cinematographer, Lukas Ettlin, did an amazing job. I’m curious to know ““ it was based on the life and times of Chris Mell with Andy Weiss helping you write it.

    GALLO: Yes, Andy was a friend of Chris’s. Andy introduced me to Chris and Chris started telling his story one night and I was on the edge of my seat and that’s how it happened.

    CS: When you co-write a film like that, how does the process go? From him telling you this crazy story to you saying, “Alright, let’s make this a screen play.” How does that process start for you?

    GALLO: For me I just started ““ Andy had known Chris longer and Andy knew the facts more than I did and oddly I was more interested in the tone of it, rather than the facts ““ at least from jump street. I just started sketching out what the movie could be and stuff like that. I guess my accuracy was off in the time line of events that happened. A lot of the stuff, about 80% of this actually happened. Maybe more, like 80 to 90% did happen. It didn’t necessarily happen in the order that we said it happened. So I sort of sketched out this outline. Andy and I did it together.

    It was very much an interesting process. I can’t actually say who did what. It was a lot of talking back and forth. A lot of disagreeing, Andy and I both ““ we agreed on a lot of stuff but the one thing that we agreed on from the beginning was that it should not be linear. The story seemed the most interesting when it was told the way Chris told us the story. And when Chris told us the story, he had a tendency…he had a stream of conscious kind of way to jump all over the place, especially in the beginning. He was talking about one event, then he would talk about how he worked here and then this and then that. The way one tells a story and we both thought that was the most interesting way to lay the story out because it would seem the most honest. So we structured it that way and I wrote some scenes, Andy wrote some scenes, he rewrote my scenes, I rewrote his scenes. It was a tumultuous and fairly bloody process but at the same time we had a great time doing it and had sometimes very different ideas on how to present things and where to place things but in general you couldn’t have two guys who were more passionate about what we were doing. And, sometimes I would cave if I thought he was right and he would cave, that kind of thing.

    CS: One of the things that holds a lot of great stories back is financing and I was impressed that you got as much as you did in order to make it. I think every penny is up on screen. Is that ever a process for you or has that ever impeded you from getting a film like this made?

    middlemenparty2009cannesfilmfestivalwfax1fwalo9lGALLO: No. Chris produced the movie and it was his personal money to help make the film. He is the best partner I ever had in terms of a person that has skin in the game. I think he respected me because he knew I made Local Color with my own money and now here I was turning around and making a film using his money but I knew what it was like to be spending your own money every day. I’m always very respectful of other people’s dough. I know some filmmakers just don’t give a shit. I’m a working class kid. I watched my father go to work every morning and come home. I have an appreciation of what a dollar actually means to someone. Just flagrantly round around spending someone else’s money is just not who I am. I convinced Chris, certainly, that to make the movie look enormous without wasting money I do know how to make a movie and look, this was a fairly expensive movie, but I think that the picture looks twice as expensive as it is.

    We shot all over the place. We shot a lot of it in Phoenix and we shot in LA and shot in Vegas. I don’t know. I just have been sorta smart about where to put a camera, how to tell a story. From Local Color I started out as a painter. I tend to see things in paintings to begin with and I know you can’t paint beyond the edges of the canvass so I’m usually pretty clear about where I want to look or where I want to point the camera. I don’t like setting up 3 blocks away and then shoot a close-up. I’ve always been very cognizant about how to tell stories through I wouldn’t say minimally, but certainly economically.

    CS: One of the questions about that, on the same subject, are there workshops for directors to help keep up with new techniques you can use in future films? Kind of like doctors where they have continuing education, is there anything you do to stay fresh as a director?

    GALLO: Yes. I watch everything. I watch a lot of movies and even TV commercials. I just watch stuff and I’m always asking, “How was that done?” In terms of style, I think the rules of filmmaking are changing, certainly, and I think the way stories are being told is changing. I think people retain more information now, very quickly, and how many shots and cuts you can do inside of a minute. I think the whole language of film is changing. It’s always evolving. I’m always watching that stuff and trying to learn and don’t want to do the same tricks I did in the last one.

    The great thing about Middle Men was that it really afforded me an opportunity to stretch and do a lot of those things because I’ve never done a film that like at the core was chaotic. Some of the comedies were just out and out comedies. You can’t really reach or pushing the bounds of cinema ““ you are trying to tell jokes and do visual sight gags. To be honest with you, Buster Keaton and Charlie Chaplain they did it with minimal means and it’s hard to top what they did anyway. So with comedy you don’t need a lot in terms of goofing around with the cameras and stuff. It’s more like what goes on inside of the frame as opposed to deliciously wacky angles and stuff. With Middle Men because it was such a chaotic drug induced sexual universe where everybody was so paranoid and acting so crazy, I could make the camera crazy. I could make the colors louder. I could be more voyeuristic or perverse. We do a lot of both shoulders and opposites and just stuff like that. It was a lot of fun. I got to stretch and just had a blast doing it.

    CS: I think the casting deserves equal credit as well. Someone who really steals the show is Giovanni Ribisi. They guy is just talented beyond a lot of his peers and I think ““ I don’t want to say he gets overlooked – but I wish I could see that guy in more movies. He is just phenomenally crazy in this movie.

    GALLO: He’s terrific and really a good guy. I think he’s so good because he’s humble. And I think the second ego creeps into your work, you are finished. He’s just so humble and so without ego and so “How can I make it better”, “What can I do to make it better?” Almost to the point where you think he’s kidding. He’s that humble and gracious about the work. And I’m that way because to me it’s just an honor to get a chance to do this stuff. I still paint every chance I get. I paint a few days a week. But to paint on a canvass as large as a movie screen and all the money and all the equipment and all the talent that goes along with it to make a film, considering I did not come from a showbiz family ““ I did this because I wanted to. I came out to LA and went through the trials and tribulations to get to where I got and I consider it an honor whenever you are on a movie set and you are working you should thank your lucky stars and thank God that you are there. I have the same feeling of humility about it so that’s why we got along so well. We would just sit around and talk about how to make it better. How can we make it better? How can we express this idea? That sort of thing.

    CS: To that point, one of the things about filmmaking is actually visualizing your initial thoughts on the page. Did you have any happy surprises that you had on paper that you didn’t realize were there as you filmed? Any moments when the words weren’t working?

    middlemenparty2009cannesfilmfestivalc8oskcmvprolGALLO: I would say, yeah. Almost everyday was a surprise. The script was solid structurally. And a lot of the dialogue that was written is still in the movie but I think a fair amount isn’t and the one thing I do as a director that I think you have to do as a director is that you have to keep your writer hat on when you’re writing and throw that hat away when you are directing. There may be other directors that may tell you differently ““ Tarantino might have a different view on it ““ but I’m not as into the sanctity of the word but what I am into is absolutely believing everything that I’m seeing in front of me.

    Sometimes you can write half a page of dialogue and an actor can get that moment across with just a look or a wink or a nod or something and I think you can throw that half a page away. And a lot of Giovanni and Gabriel sometimes would go off on these improvs that were frankly better than what was written and I would just tell the cameraman just keep shooting”¦keep shooting”¦keep shooting. When that delicious stuff starts to happen, it’s not just people hitting marks and saying lines but it starts getting into that other place and a lot of that happened everyday. It just started ““ people just became those people and you’re witnessing it and you know that what you are seeing is just special because it doesn’t happen that often. It happened on Local Color with Armin Mueller-Stahl and Trevor Morgan, Samantha Mathis and everybody. We had great moments but it was a different kind of storytelling. It was a very internal, deliberately paced film where this film, Middle Men, is just craziness and people doing massive amounts of cocaine were not acting in their best interest at any time. To me the whole movie was like driving across a bridge ““ the bridge is out ““ but they just keep driving. Me personally, that stuff just makes me laugh. Sort of like he was being his best and worst all at once. I hope I am answering your question.

    CS: Yes, you are.

    GALLO: Everyday was a surprise. Jimmy Caan, who I think is terrific in the movie. I think he really reached. He said he didn’t want to do what we call a safe performance. Because a guy with a movie persona like that can always lean on the 100 or so movies that he’s done and he didn’t want to do that on this one. He really wanted to reach. He wanted to create a character that was legitimately creepy, not creepy in a movie sense. We had a lot of discussions about things that never ended up in the movie ““ things that wouldn’t end up in the movie but we created a whole backstory for him. Like things he has been doing for the last 20 years of his life that led to this type of behavior and I said not one shred of it is in the movie but it is in the movie because of some of the bizarre choices he made. Creepy choices he made as an actor. I really respect that he reached the way he did because he could have just said “I’ll be James Caan, tough guy” as opposed to doing what he did.

    CS: And I was just going to pop in with that before you did. He made me feel uneasy. The whole time I saw him on the screen, it was a great performance because it wasn’t bombastic, it wasn’t over the top, it was just enough to make you feel that whatever this guy is selling, don’t buy it.

    GALLO: Yeah. He said to me at one point he based it on a couple people he knew. He wouldn’t tell me who they were but he said they were guys he met in his life that after you shook hands with them you literally wanted to boil your hand. Sleazy business types, lawyers and I think he just took some of those creeps that we all meet in our lives and he put them all in a blender and he became that person. It’s a terrific performance. It’s almost like he’s sexually ambiguous. There was a kind of rage in him that was very interesting. He’s also very charming at times but you know that everything that’s coming out of his mouth is an out and out lie and that it’s all self-serving. If he says the words good morning, he’s already angling. There’s an agenda to everything with this guy. It’s out and out creepy and at the same time he had the ability to make it fun. Because, let’s face it, he’s as creepy as hell and we know he’s probably capable of murder but somehow we keep laughing at that.

    (Laughs)

    And a lot of times when we were making the movie, we were laughing a lot and saying why are we laughing? But we were laughing all day long and said, there’s something good going on here.

    CS: I think something else too ““ I can’t let an interview go by but Rade Serbedzija ““ he could read the bible and I think I would buy that DVD.

    GALLO: He’s terrific. He’s absolutely terrific. With him for instance, I kept saying I don’t want to do the standard Russian mob guy that’s always posing and you’ve seen it in a million movies. My personal problem with a lot of the films today I think it’s because some of the directors are so self-conscious in the choices that they are making they don’t feel comfortable ““ it might be ego or insecurities ““ but they don’t feel comfortable just telling the story. They have to let you know every 5 seconds that they were also there behind the camera. I find it quite annoying. You look at Hitchcock and you look at Frank Capra and look at William Wilder and look at even some of the later guys ““ John Frankenheimer, certainly Sidney Lumet, you got to look at their films several times before you start to realize the tricks an chicanery they were doing. It is so well hidden. I’m a real student of this stuff. I really watch films but those guys were storytellers first. And they would say “What’s the story, what’s the story about, what’s the subtext about, what are these people feeling, what do their homes look like?”

    If you watch a lot of Hitchcock films, those people didn’t know they were in a thriller. They were just normal people that got caught up in a situation and they just happened to be in a Hitchcock movie. They weren’t doing a lot of posing. I find in a lot of the movies today the director says “I’m making a thriller so I’m going to have people in a pose-y, kind of thriller way””¦and I’m like, “What?” That’s bullshit. Am I making any sense?

    CS: Absolutely.

    GALLO: And with Middle Men these people don’t know they are in this movie I’m making. They are just trying to get through their day. Obviously they have a whole lot of issues and problems and stuff like that but I’m going to shot them in a certain way but they don’t know they are in this movie. I wanted to make it as natural as I could in terms of their performances and then try to catch the soul of what they were doing using cameras and lenses and lights. Those are my tools. Same things like paint brushes and paint.

    CS: You choose to shoot a lot of it here in Phoenix. What drew you here instead of shooting it down in So Cal where porn is king.

    GALLO: To be completely honest, that was a choice of the producers because of the tax credit. You get 30 or 25% back. Whatever it was, it was very enticing for the filmmakers ““ for the producers. For Chris. Because you can throw that money back in post production which is what we did. That’s how we got all the Stones music and all that stuff ““ soundtrack is loaded.

    CS: Insane.

    GALLO: Yeah. That was one of my big things when I was cutting the movie. I cut the movie with a lot of those tunes because I’m a big music buff too. I love music. I play saxophone and guitar. I just love music and to me music was a character in the movie. It had to drive the movie. It is a movie certainly about a sub-culture in the United States yet it is something that most people, fairly intimately familiar with it whether they want to talk to it or not but at the same time when you think of a porn star or your think of a Russian mob guy you don’t necessarily thing that they go home and listen to the Rolling Stones.

    (Laughs)

    But the truth is they probably do or they listen to something that we’ve all heard so I wanted to constantly make it accessible and remind you that these are all very ““ they have different lives but they certainly are our neighbors or certainly live in the same city that we do. I wanted to keep driving that idea home. These are not alien space creatures. These are very normal people who some of them went to school with you and they spun out and led the lives that they did. I always wanted to have that reminder be at the center of the movie all the time. That’s why we made the music choices that we made.

    CS: One of the other subtle things that happens with this movie is it never feels judgmental in any way about the subject matter.

    GALLO: I went out of my way to not be pro or con. It just is. It’s here. This is what’s going on. I met some people and interviewed them and I was very surprised that you can’t make assumptions about anybody. I was shocked. Especially with the porn stars. I don’t deal much with the porn stars in the movie other than Laura Ramsey, her character. Some of the women I talked to, and again I don’t want to make an assumption that a porn star is stupid, but sometimes you could just say oh the bimbo and put them in a box instantly but I found that to be more not the case. I found most of the women ““ yeah, there was certainly that like central casting bimbo ““ but at the same time there are some people I would say are crass capitalists. I’m talking about the women. I found the whole world to be very fascinating. Once you get over your initial discomfort dealing with it, it does, certainly in the early stages of researching this and talking to people, I would catch myself being uncomfortable or embarrassed because you are dropping a lot of those layers or boundaries. At first I was very uncomfortable with it and that sort of went away because I had to deal with and I had to deal with my own feelings about it.

    CS: You work your way through it. Luke Wilson’s character had to work through it in a way ““ he’s not doing anything but it’s a business. It’s commerce. That’s basically what it is.

    GALLO: I think at the same time his character does have something knocking. Something in his subconscious that is knocking constantly and in the end he just doesn’t feel right about it and without giving too much away but it does eat at him. An interesting thing ““ we had a test preview with the cards and stuff which is sort of useful process to make movies and I think people misuse the information a lot of times. They don’t understand how to really use that process properly. But with 300 people in the audience and 280 get confused in a scene you should certainly listen to that. But, the movie ““ we screened it and it tested insanely high and we were shocked that all four quadrants scored into the 90’s. I literally was shocked. How the hell? I mean Tom Sherak, who was the head of distribution at Fox and Revolution, his son William is one of the producers he laughed and said how the hell did you make a movie about the porn business that ends up being a date movie and I said, “I don’t know.”

    (Laughs)

    But it scored the highest with older women.

    CS: Really?

    GALLO: And we were shocked at that. Like mid-high 90’s with older women. And I was like why? I think ultimately it was because I don’t think any of the women were portrayed badly and I think Luke just wants to go home. He wants to go back to his wife and kids and doesn’t know how to do it anymore. He gets exposed to something that effects him and he just wants to go back. I think that made it so powerful for everyone.

  • Trailer Park: THE DISAPPEARANCE OF ALICE CREED reviewed & a Worth Reviving

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    Check out my other column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

    THE DISAPPEARANCE OF ALICE CREED – Review/Giveaway

    disappearancealicecreedOne of the things that struck me as I watched The Disappearance of Alice Creed, a ferocious first feature from writer/director J Blakeson, was that even though a lot of this was shot in a confined space it does not take away one iota from the thrill of what the movie aims to accomplish. What it aims for, you understand, is to have a story so good that it could all take place on a theater stage without nary a change in scenery.

    Many films, like David Fincher’s Panic Room, have tried to use minimalism as a means to telegraph the claustrophobic insanity that can happen when a human being in confined in a tight space. Here, though, J Blakeson has a story of a kidnapped woman, played by Gemma Arterton, Alice, play out with remarkable results. The riveting kidnappers themselves, Vic (Eddie Marsan) and Danny (Martin Compston), aren’t just two thieves looking to kidnap a rich man’s daughter for a hefty bounty these are characters who have real emotions, real reactions. It’s so inventive in that Alice isn’t the only person capable of thoughtful introspection, it’s a masterstroke that Marsan and Compston are given roles that add complex character traits that muddy what ought to be a pretty clear cut film about how a woman is able to overcome a bad situation.

    Additionally, the film excels because it doesn’t rely on the usual tropes and plot devices of a movie like this and it’s inherently more enjoyable because of it. Yes, it has twists and turns but much like a writing exercise where if you were a teacher looking to have every student in a classroom write about how you would change a tire, this is the solution that would work the best. It’s not the premise that makes it so good, but it’s the execution of it that makes it so good.

    The delight, then, in seeing it’s not following the same parameters, and it doesn’t, is simply enjoying the idea that you don’t know which way the film will zig or zag. Again, Marsan, Compston, and Arterton deserve the credit for making these people so much more than mere characters but by using the script they were given, a tight one at that, and imbuing their performances with the same level of craftiness what you have is a seriously fun film that just delivers on all levels.

    It’s hard to review a film that depends so much on its surprises but the movie just hums along without any slack and, thus, makes for a viewing experience that if nothing else will keep your attention until the very last twist that doesn’t feel forced or underhanded, it’s most definitely earned.

    And, for those who would like to win a Disappearance of Alice Creed prize pack, and didn’t see it last week, please read on:

    To help get the word out on The Disappearance Of Alice Creed Anchor Bay Films want to give one of you lucky readers a chance to win a DVD prize pack. The grand prize includes: Brooklyn’s Finest, The Crazies, Pandorum, Righteous Kill and Traitor DVDs. All you have to do is shoot me a note at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com and I’ll get you entered.

    While you wait to see if you’re the one who will be anointed with these goodies go on and find Alice Creed on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/whereisalicecreed

    For additional information please visit: http://www.whereisalicecreed.com

    Become a fan: http://www.facebook.com/whereisalicecreed

    As well, watch the first 5 minutes of the thriller: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhPNzoI__28

    Good Luck!

    Worth Reviving: Electra Glide in Blue – by Ray Schillaci

    eleI was seventeen-years-old in 1973 and going to as many “R” rated movies as possible. It was a thrill going without my parents and even a bigger one when I found something that went beyond the simple-minded T&A or Hershel Gordon Lewis gorehound reissue. I cannot remember what prompted me to take the RTD bus all the way to the El Portal Theater in the middle of a sweltering hot & humid San Fernando Valley summer day to see a limited run, PG rated movie about a cop and the motorcycle he hated. It could have been a combination of an ultra-cool poster, a kick-ass trailer and a few critics that were going gaga over this flipside of “Easy Rider”. Whatever it was, “Electra Glide in Blue” will forever be one of my favorite films that to this day surprises everyone I introduce it to.

    From the very misleading beginning the director prepares you for a story that is not going to be told in the usual fashion. Hell, the credits don’t even start until the director has wowed us with the opening scene and goes on to deliver one of the greatest introductions of a lead character in many a year. Suggestion; CRANK your sound system up for that bass-filled intro, it’s amazing.

    Director James William Guercio was a composer and the producer of a little known group called Chicago Transit Authority, later shortened to Chicago. Soon after his success, Guercio was offered the opportunity to direct a film based on true events about the complicated life and eventual death of an Arizona motorcycle officer in the early 70s. What he brought to the table was a vision of pure Americana harkening back to the golden days of John Ford westerns.

    In fact, when Guercio had the chance to use cinematographer Conrad Hall he not only insisted that he forego his director’s salary to afford the highly acclaimed cinematographer but insisted that he wanted to recapture the beauty of Ford’s cinematographer Winton C Hoch. A funny anecdote; Hall had informed the director that for 25 years he was trying to escape that look. Guercio compromised and gave Conrad Hall the opportunity to shoot all interior shots any way he wanted. Hall was given free creative reign with the exception of exteriors which would be true to the John Ford vision. This amalgam of imagery is a sheer delight that only adds to the richness of Robert Boris and Rupert Hitzig’s story and director Guercio’s unique vision.

    Robert Blake plays John “Big John” Wintergreen (with an unusual mix of self deprecating charm, machismo and sensitivity), an Arizona motorcycle officer that yearns for higher ground. He finds his life far too simplistic and is dedicated to elevate himself to detective where he can use his mind and gain some respect. His initiation, journey and eventual disillusionment as an officer during a very volatile time for law enforcement is exhilarating, confusing and very profound. His dedication to the law and doing the right thing only brings disappointment and compounded trouble to his already complicated life.

    Wintergreen is brought on to the scene of a suicide that he insists is a murder case. What unravels is a heartbreakingly honest expose of the fragility of men and the machismo they wear as a badge of honor. There are twists and turns galore that keep one second guessing, but if that was not enough, the filmmakers pull out all the stops with memorable performances played to natural perfection by top notch character actors like Royal Dano and Elisha Cook Jr. The subplots are incredibly integral and not throwaways which makes the story a complicated one at times, but pays off big in the end.

    The studio (United Artists) had no idea how to market the small budgeted film (just under a million dollars) that was so way ahead of its time in the early 70s. UA played on Blake’s height; comparing him to taller officers and stating that he and old time western star Alan Ladd were the same height. They also attempted to just toss it out as another action film with the usual low budget art used for the action genre of that era. But many critics rallied behind the film declaring its power along with its breathtaking visuals. For years this film has been a misunderstood American masterpiece of cinema and to this day has not received its due. Even the 2005 DVD release had a horrible marketing cover with the declaration “He’s taking justice into his own hands.” There is nothing of the sort! Whoever threw that line in never bothered to even watch the movie.

    For some, this film may be hard to watch only because of what star Robert Blake is known for today. That throws him into the category of other troubled artists; Woody Allen and Mel Gibson to name a few. I don’t even like bringing this up since it can prove to be a dicey moral dilemma. Do we turn our back on such landmark masterpieces as “Annie Hall” and “Hannah and Her Sisters” or “Braveheart” and “Apocalypto” because the artist may appear morally corrupt to our society? When faced with this, I remind myself that film is a collaborative effort and by punishing one, I am punishing hundreds of people who were involved in the making of these films. A reward can be had for pure film enthusiasts who can look past these issues.

    There is no denying Blake’s powerful, multi-dimensional performance that eventually leads to his landing his own successful TV show (Baretta) for many years. Another interesting anecdote; after three very successful TV seasons Robert Blake wanted to move on. He no longer had any desire to continue on with the character and when Universal begged him for one more season Blake accepted with a ridiculous offer feeling all too well that the studio would never comply. To his surprise they did ““ paying him a higher salary and building a custom home on the studio property that would include a custom toilet seat that matched his ass. This just shows the depths that studios will sink to get what they want. When it was all said and done, Blake spent little time in his home away from home.

    But it is not just Robert Blake that makes this film succeed on so many levels. It is the sheer artistry of director James William Guercio and cinematographer Conrad Hall. It is Guercio’s dynamic score set against the backdrop of Monument Valley. It is the perfect pitch nuances by supporting actors Billy Green Bush, Mitch Ryan and Jeanine Riley. And, finally it’s Rupert Hitzig and Robert Boris’ morality play that becomes an ode to law enforcement in the early 70s that made life a war zone for so many during those confused times.

    Could I imagine the film without Robert Blake? Absolutely not, his stature and performance proves to be a dynamic linchpin for this beautiful film. It is mind blowing and our loss that director Guercio never went on to make other films. It is unclear as to why he never pursued that end of his career any further (with the exception of producing another Robert Blake film, “Second Hand Hearts”). Perhaps he was satisfied with his accomplishments in music having produced successful recordings for Chicago, The Buckinghams and Blood, Sweat and Tears. He also went on to develop a recording studio the Caribou Ranch nestled in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado and used successfully by such high profile artists like Elton John, Rod Stewart, Billy Joel and Waylon Jennings.

    In regards to getting the chance to watch this true American cinema gem, it is available through Netflix, but you may be hard pressed to locate it at your local video store. It can also be purchased at a number of places on the net. My only beef is with the uncaring transfer that the studio (MGM) subjected us to. Yes, it’s better than the VHS version, but that’s not saying much and this is a film crying out for extras. My wish is that Criterion gets a hold of this and does the film justice with an endearing Blu Ray presentation. One that wows us like it did me the first time I set my eyes on it upon the big screen. At the time my body nearly felt thumped to death by the dynamic score blasting out of the speaker system at the El Portal. This brings back memories of when individual theaters had double bills and the word “multiplex” was only used in science and engineering.

  • Trailer Park: THE DISAPPEARANCE OF ALICE CREED Giveaway, THE DUNGEON MASTERS, THE KANSAS CITY ROYALS: 1985 WORLD SERIES COLLECTOR’S EDITIONon

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    Check out my other column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

    THE DISAPPEARANCE OF ALICE CREED- Giveaway

    disappearancealicecreedForget about Clash of the Titans, don’t bother with Prince of Persia, and by all means take a pass on Quantum of Solace. The one film that showcases the wicked power of actress Gemma Arterton is The Disappearance of Alice Creed.

    While I don’t know what I can or can’t say before the film opens next week, August 6th, I don’t think anyone will have a problem with me saying that you ought to seek this film out and watch a movie that is the perfect answer for a time of the year when you get nothing but ho-hum releases. Truly, a movie that delivers on being both exciting and thrilling, it’s a feature that keeps you guessing what is coming next.

    To help get the word out on The Disappearance Of Alice Creed Anchor Bay Films want to give one of you lucky readers a chance to win a DVD prize pack. The grand prize includes: Brooklyn’s Finest, The Crazies, Pandorum, Righteous Kill and Traitor DVDs. All you have to do is shoot me a note at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com and I’ll get you entered.

    While you wait to see if you’re the one who will be anointed with these goodies go on and find Alice Creed on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/whereisalicecreed

    For additional information please visit: http://www.whereisalicecreed.com

    Become a fan: http://www.facebook.com/whereisalicecreed

    As well, watch the first 5 minutes of the thriller: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhPNzoI__28

    Good Luck!

    About The Film:

    Two men – one in his twenties, the other nearer forty, both intensely focused on the task at hand – line the inside of a transit van with plastic. Shopping, they buy a drill, a mattress and other supplies. In a small flat they assemble a bed for the mattress and staple foam insulation and board to the walls and windows of a bedroom. Then, their meticulous preparations complete, they kidnap a young woman. They drag her from the street into the back of the van and, with a bag over her head and ball gag in her mouth, take her back to the flat, tying her to the bed in the room they have converted into a prison cell.

    The kidnappers are Danny (Martin Compston) and Vic (Eddie Marsan), two ex-cons planning to make a mint on the ransom for the young woman.  The younger, nervier of the two, Danny defers to the more experienced Vic, who acts with a steely conviction.  Their hostage is Alice Creed (Gemma Arterton), daughter of a rich businessman, chosen by Vic and Danny as their passport to a better life. Terrified and immobile at first, it soon becomes clear that Alice isn ‘ t about to let her captors use her as capital without a fight. As determined to escape as Vic and Danny are to succeed, Alice enters into a battle of wills which strains the already fractious relationship between the two men. As the deadline for the exchange draws nearer, all three are brought close to breaking point, with Vic and Danny ‘ s foolproof plan descending into a desperate struggle for survival.

    A taut, emotionally intense thriller, the debut feature from writer-director J Blakeson eschews genre convention, generating tension from the sexual and psychological ties that bind captive to captors.

    Produced by Adrian Sturges (The Escapist), the film stars Gemma Arterton (Prince of Persia, Tamara Drewe, Quantum of Solace), Eddie Marsan (Happy-Go-Lucky, Sherlock Holmes) and Martin Compston (Sweet Sixteen, Red Road)

    THE DISAPPEARANCE OF ALICE CREED will be in theaters August 6th from Anchor Bay .

    THE DUNGEON MASTERS – DVD Review

    dungeon_mastersI love this movie.

    Much like Trekkies, this DVD explores the nuances of those who play Dungeons & Dragons. Of course the movie doesn’t work if you just took a look at some well meaning nerd who loved to roll the dice with his buddies on a Friday night, imbibing root beer and throwing back some Funyuns. No, the movie works because we see those at the fringe, the one you would be scared to be sitting next to on a long plane flight should they get it in them to explain the difference between an elf and a troll.

    But, you know what? These are harmless fanatics. I would rather someone be as obsessive about the three lovers of all things Dungeon than someone who has a habit that could lead to more serious problems. Director Keven McAlester deserves a lot of credit for thinking long and hard about what would make for an interesting documentary, eschewing a finger pointing laugh fest and instead opting for a serious mediation on what it means to these people.

    I, for one, am in awe of these people as I really didn’t understand it growing up, this movie also made me accept that I was a geek as opposed to a nerd because of its intricate rules and application of math which really was like garlic to a arithmetic-phobe like myself, but gained an appreciation for it by watching this. It’s really not an intricate treatise on the nature of life but, again, that’s where McAlester deserves some kudos. He makes a movie that shows them to be sensitive human beings who simply love to play this game and incorporate it deeply into their lives. Like Trekkies, we see them at first to be outcasts who are a little weird around the edges but, by the end, you really do end up feeling an affinity for what some of these people have gone through in order to keep playing a game they love.

    Any movie that can put into context any marginalized group which has been seen as on the fringe and misunderstood gets a vote in my book and it was a delight to finally see what these nerds were all uppity about in the first place. I get it now.

    About The Movie:

    Some board games are merely played. Others are lived. Among the latter, none is more obsessed over than Dungeons & Dragons, the enduringly popular fantasy role-playing board game in which a roll of the oddly angled dice can alter a character’s life. But for some dedicated players, the game has altered their actual lives. Three such fanatics are profiled in THE DUNGEON MASTERS, an eye-opening film from the critically acclaimed director, Keven McAllester (You’re Gonna Miss Me) coming to DVD from FilmBuff and MPI Media Group on August 3, 2010, with an SRP of $19.98.

    What the hit comedy feature Role Models did for live-action role-playing game enthusiasts, THE DUNGEON MASTERS does for devoted table-top players. Dungeons & Dragons is no mere game to Richard, Scott and Elizabeth, the people at the center of this entertaining and ultimately moving documentary. Against the backdrop of crumbling middle-class America, these three struggling adults devote their lives to Dungeons & Dragons, the storied role-playing game introduced in 1974. One player is a sanitation worker who lures friends into a “Sphere of Annihilation.” Another is an evil “drow-elf” displaced by Hurricane Katrina. And one is a failed supervillain who starts a cable access show involving ninjas, puppets and a cooking segment.

    But the baroque fantasies of these three clash with their mundane real lives, and they gradually come to realize that the game’s imaginary triumphs can’t completely mask the very real disappointments of life. The beauty of Keven McAlester’s film is in revealing his subjects’ real-life heroism: summoning the courage to face hardships head on. Along the way, THE DUNGEON MASTERS reimagines the themes of classic heroic cinema, creating an intimate portrait of struggles and triumphs.

    The Austin Chronicle’s Richard Whittaker said of THE DUNGEON MASTERS: “McAlester’s film cuts with sensitivity through the nerdy facade to the dedication its subjects show to their hobby in the toughest of times.” Kevin Kelly of Indiewire called it “a well-crafted film that “¦ gives you an unflinching look at three people who have made gaming one of their creative outlets.”

    Since its debut in the 1970s, the role-playing board game Dungeons and Dragons has sold more than 20 million copies. It has spawned two feature films and dozens of books; all told, sales of the game and related books, DVDs and equipment have surpassed $1 billion.

    THE DUNGEON MASTERS was an Official Selection at the Toronto International Film Festival and the South by Southwest Film Festival.

    THE KANSAS CITY ROYALS: 1985 WORLD SERIES COLLECTORS EDITION – DVD Review

    kansas-city-1985-wsI was there. Game 7. I was 10 at the time and there was no such thing, in 1985, as DVR’ing the thing so I could see whether I showed up on the screen.

    The thing about the series at the time, because it dealt with two teams that literally only had to roll a little further down the highway in order to get to each others’ stadiums, was how insular it felt. I still remember feeling like this was a series that no one else cared about because the teams were so close together but I wasn’t too far off in my assessment that life wouldn’t get much better than it did for the Royals as it did for this World Series.

    The wonderful thing about this box set which collects all 7 games is how, if you’re a fan of the game, you can see how much things haven’t really changed. Like football games that are replayed on ESPN Classic there is a certain timelessness to watching these little slices of sports history. Not only was it something to witness, how the Royals shut down the Cardinals in Game 7 with a shutout to win it all, but seeing how DVD now affords us the opportunity how 2 blown calls in Game 6 essentially allowed the Royals the opportunity that they might not have had if the umps were doing what they should have been. It’s as clear as day and it almost feels like revisiting a crime scene where the call just went to the wrong team and perhaps allowed them the one edge they needed.

    It’s hard to quantify why buying this set is such a bargain but not only are these complete games enough to make any baseball fan salivate as you can see, like I did, the drama unfold as the series wore on it is also the inclusion of some priceless bonus features that should more than enough seal the deal. From a retrospective on the moment looking back 25 years to a highlight reel that puts the Royals’ success in proper context with showcasing who they beat out in the ALCS it is also worth checking out because this win might as well be seen as significant as the Chicago Cubs winning it all. The Royals’ odds to win it all once again might be as absurd as the whole team winning the lottery and being struck with lightning but, honestly, this box set captures the moment when lightning did strike at just the right moment. It’s like Major League had the Cleveland Indians went on to win it all. Honestly, after watching this, you would be hard pressed not to be inspired by a team that was good enough to put the St. Louis Cardinals away and win the World Series.

    And if you see some goofy kid in the upper deck wearing a blue clown wig? That’s me, rooting on the Royals.

    About The Movie:

    In 1985, under the even keeled guidance of manager Dick Howser, and the one-field excellence of the their veteran stars including George Brett and Frank White and precocious pitcher Bret Saberhagen the Kansas City Royals established a championship resilience.  The club overcame a late season deficit to win the American League West division, then overcame a 3 games to 1 deficit to stun the Toronto Blue Jays  and win the American League. With a come-from-behind pattern squarely in place Kansas City completed its improbably run by then storming back from a similar 3 games to 1 deficit to capture the World Series crown.

    This July, A&E Home Entertainment and Major League Baseball Productions invite sports fans everywhere to relive the Royals’ history-making World Series in a spectacular 7-disc set ““ THE KANSAS CITY ROYALS 1985 WORLD SERIES COLLECTOR’S EDITION.  Priced to add to every sports lovers home entertainment collection at $69.95srp, the DVD, timed to the 25th anniversary of Kansas City’s heart-stopping championship run, also features memorable moments from the Royals ’85 season, rare interviews, archival footage and much more!

    Released from the Major League Baseball Film and Video archives for the first time ever, each disc features the actual television broadcasts of this historic Fall Classic.  The seven games in this remarkable DVD collection showcase the rollercoaster of intra-state emotions as the Cardinals flew out to grab three quick wins in the first four games, only to have the Royals capture the final three games in oh-so-dramatic fashion.  These vintage games capture the beauty of mid-1980s Royals Stadium, a roster of all-time Royals stars, and a battle of players, managers, and intra-state cities that enthralled the region and delighted a nation.

    DVD bonuses on the set include the 1985 Kansas City Royals season Highlight Film, segment on George Brett Hometown Hero, Bret Saberhagen Cy Young Award Winner, and classic segments including: ALCS Highlights; Royals Clubhouse Celebration,  “Royals Looking Back”Â  and “How The Royals Met the Cardinals”.

    ALADIN – DVD Review

    aladinThis is my first Bollywood experience.

    Truly, I didn’t know what I was getting into but thankfully this movie was one that I was able to thoroughly enjoy with the kind of interest I usually reserve for films where the bar is set unbelievably low. It’s not a knock on the film but when you realize you’re the outsider, I would assume that productions like this have their own set of rules and parameters around which other people who consume them regularly are able to judge their quality, so it’s really incumbent on me as a guest to the form to experience the movie in its totality.

    Split into two distinct kinds of films, Aladin tells the tale of Aladin Chatterjee (Riteish Deshmukh) who comes from the hardscrabble life we’ve come to know of the westernized ideal of who Aladdin really is and comes into owning a magical lamp not by finding it in the pit of a sand lion’s stomach but as a gift. The real delight comes as the dueling genies I did recognize from my many Disney viewings of the animated classic take on a supernatural, and very corporal, form.

    The bad and good genies posses normal features and actually adds a more interesting twist to a film that impresses with its special effects and toe tapping musical numbers which give any viewer of this movie a delightful spectacle of song and dance along with its more dramatic elements. With the parts of the clever genie (Amitabh Bachchan) and the one who would like to see the power taken away from the young upstart (Sanjay Dutt) played by a couple of heavyweights on the Bollywood scene it is not hard to see why this movie looks as polished as it does.

    Director Sujoy Ghosh deserves credit for obviously trying to bridge a narrative gap between the fantastic and the dramatic but it also deserves kudos from me for making the movie accessible to someone who may not understand the structure of a film like this. Yes, at times the song and dance numbers seem a bit jarring and out of place but they’re wonderfully choreographed and the effects aren’t that bad. They are sure better than let’s say a film that airs on the Disney Channel on any given Saturday night but the cumulative effect of all of this is a movie that I would heartily recommend to anyone looking to enjoy a true spectacle of song, dance, and excitement. While some of the dialogue truly falls flat, be it delivery or in its simplicity, that shouldn’t deter anyone from seeking this out and enjoying a delightful, earnest story.

    About The Movie:

    This new Hindi movie, stars the latest heart throb chocolate-boy, Ritesh Deshmukh and the newcomer and oh-so-pretty Barbie Doll, Jacqueline. To add up to the spice is Amitabh, the genie who is at his best with the character of Genius and to create tension, tossed in the middle of this perfect love story is the villian, Sanjay Dutt.

    From the land of myths and legends – India – comes a fantasy adventure for the entire family. Directed by Sujoy Ghosh, ‘Aladin’ is a modern re-imagining of the classic tale of ‘Aladin and The Magic Lamp’.

    Aladin Chatterjee (Riteish Deshmukh) lives in the city of Khwaish, an orphan who has been bullied since childhood by Kasim and his gang. But his life changes when Jasmine (Jacqueline Fernandez) gives him a magic lamp as a Birthday gift – because it lets loose the genie, Genius (Amitabh Bachchan).

    Desperate to grant him 3 wishes and seek the end of his contract with the Magic Lamp and get retirement, the rock-star Genius makes Aladin’s life difficult until the real threat looms on the horizon : the ex-genie, Ringmaster (Sanjay Dutt).

    Why does Ringmaster want to kill Aladin? What is the dark secret about Aladin’s past that Genius is carrying? And what is Aladin’s destiny? Find out more in this swashbuckling fantasy adventure film.

  • Trailer Park: CLASH OF THE TITANS, TERRIBLY HAPPY, RAMONA AND BEEZUS

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    Check out my other column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

    CLASH OF THE TITANS – Giveaway

    clash-of-the-titans-dvdI didn’t a chance to see this movie when it came out theatrically months ago but I couldn’t be more eager to see what Louis Leterrier concocted. I am an unabashed fan of both The Transporter and The Incredible Hulk so it’s only right to be at least interested in knowing how the man created a 450 million dollar box office juggernaut.

    I may have to get my own Blu-ray, if you’re gonna see the Kracken you’ve got to see the Kracken in high def, but I have a copy of the DVD to give to 2 lucky readers.

    All you need to do to enter is to shoot me a message at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com and give me at least one actor who played in the original film that started it all. And, as an aside, I know people knock the original for whatever reason but that movie was a touchstone in my youth as it was the first Ray Harryhausen film I came into contact with. It’s a great fantasy epic and I hope that this new version captures that same level of adventure.

    Good luck!

    About the DVD/Blu-ray:

    Jump into a mythological world of epic action and adventure when “Clash of the Titans” arrives on Blu-ray Combo Pack and DVD on July 27th from Warner Home Video.  “Clash of the Titans” propels audiences into the mythological realm of Perseus’ quest amidst a world where the gods are formidable and the creatures even more fearsome.

    The Blu-ray disc includes an exciting never-before-seen alternate ending and the immersive Maximum Movie Mode, which includes walk-ons by Sam Worthington, Liam Neeson, Ralph Fiennes, and Director Louis Leterrier, focus points, Picture-in-Picture commentary, and BD-Live connectivity.

    As a war rages between men and kings and kings and gods, the battle amongst the gods is the one that could ultimately destroy the world.  Hope rests with one. Perseus, son of god, Zeus, yet raised a man, sets off on a hazardous journey deep into forbidden worlds to avenge the death of his family and defeat Hades, vengeful god of the underworld, before he can seize power from Zeus and unleash hell on earth.  Leading the charge, Perseus battles unholy demons and fearsome beasts, but will only survive if he can accept his power as a god, defy his fate and create his own destiny.

    From director, Louis Leterrier (“The Transporter”, “The Incredible Hulk”) “Clash of the Titans” stars Sam Worthington (“Avatar”, “Terminator Salvation”), Liam Neeson (upcoming “The A-Team”, “Batman Begins”, “Gangs of New York”), Ralph Fiennes (upcoming “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows” Parts I & II, “The Hurt Locker”, The Constant Gardner”) and Gemma Arterton (upcoming “Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time”, “Quantum of Solace”).

    On July 27, “Clash of the Titans” theatrical version will also be available ON DEMAND through Digital Cable, Satellite TV, Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 game consoles. The Unrated Cut and theatrical version can be downloaded for rental or purchase on iTunes and Amazon Video On Demand.

    SYNOPSIS

    In “Clash of the Titans,” the ultimate struggle for power pits men against kings and kings against gods. But the war between the gods themselves could destroy the world. Born of a god but raised as a man, Perseus (Sam Worthington) is helpless to save his family from Hades (Ralph Fiennes), vengeful god of the underworld. With nothing left to lose, Perseus volunteers to lead a dangerous mission to defeat Hades before he can seize power from Zeus (Liam Neeson) and unleash hell on earth.

    Perseus sets off on a perilous journey deep into forbidden worlds, leading a daring band of warriors, including Draco (Mads Mikkelsen), an experienced soldier who encourages the defiant Perseus to make use of his god-given abilities. Battling unholy demons and fearsome beasts, they will only survive if Perseus can accept his power as a god, defy his fate and create his own destiny.

    DVD ELEMENTS

    The “Clash of the Titans” DVD Single Disc the following special features:

    o        Deleted Scenes

    The “Clash of the Titans” Blu-ray Disc contains the following special features:

    o        Sam Worthington: An Action Hero for the Ages

    o        Deleted Scenes

    o        Alternate Ending

    o        Maximum Movie Mode: Join Sam Worthington, Liam Neeson, Ralph Fiennes, and Director Louis Leterrier on an incredible journey all while you watch the movie.

    Featurette Focus Points

    o       Sam Worthington is Perseus

    o       Harnessing the Gods

    o       Zeus: Father of Gods and Men

    o       Enter the World of Hades

    o       Calibos: The Man Behind the Monster

    o       Tenerife: A Continent on an Island

    o       Scorpioch

    o       Actors and Their Stunts

    o       Wales : A Beautiful Scarred Landscape

    o       Bringing Medusa to Life

    o       Prepare for the Kraken!

    o        More than forty minutes of picture in picture (PiP) commentary

    o        BD-Live

    o       Clash of the Titans: International Special

    o        DVD Combo Disc

    o       Feature film in standard definition

    o       Digital Copy (Windows Media and iTunes)

    RAMONA AND BEEZUS – Review

    ramona-and-beezus-posterTo review this film with the usual sets of criteria usually reserved for any other movie would be unfair.

    The film, a sticky, saccharine sweet yarn about a young girl’s journey though pre-tween issues isn’t very resonant. It’s not that director Elizabeth Allen’s last theatrical effort, 2006’s Aquamarine, made a bad movie but it’s just not very interesting if you’re not a girl between the ages of 5 and 12 or a woman who can identify with what it was like to be that age.

    More suitable for the Disney Channel than it is a movie theater Ramona and Beezus is a movie made for the kind of parents who find a PG rating too racy or scripted television too daring. The plot does tempt with mature themes as Ramona’s (Joey King) father, played by John Corbett, is laid off from work and the family is put into a tizzy as everyone tries to figure out how to move forward in a house that is on the verge of being sold, how to deal with Ramona’s increasingly troubled behavior, and a multitude of other minor troubles that are completely germane to films like this.

    Never mind debating whether the movie is representative of any kind of progressive idea or is the springboard for a budding director who is showing great promise but save for a few animated moments within the film there is nothing terribly exciting or noteworthy for a completely forgettable piece of art. However forgettable it might be, though, the movie does manage to satisfy the needs for any female child looking for a film that has enough sterile slapstick and generic goofiness which will all but avoid any kind of editing once it does make it on television.

    To see how Ramona evolves as a character isn’t very satisfying as we’re essentially right where we are when we began this movie, and the only evolution any of the other supporting players has is all but obvious at the outset, and I don’t think the point for this movie to exist isn’t to push the boundaries of any narrative storytelling. Yet, it exists solely to showcase characters from a book series that, itself, doesn’t dare to be anything else other than light reading. On that account alone it succeeds in being a syllogistic representation that faithfully adheres to the characters and situations of the novels. In other words, young girls will dig this.

    TERRIBLY HAPPY – DVD Review

    terribly_happy_posterYou must, must check this film out. If you only make enough to buy 1 DVD, and Lord knows that is the least of your problems if you’re on that tight of a budget, make this one you get this month as this movie has still stayed with me months after seeing it. It’s available now from Oscilloscope Laboratories so do what you can to witness one of the brightest spots of the spring movie season.

    Because I really am a fan of this film here is my theatrical review of the film and I hope at least one of you investigate a great movie you probably never heard of:

    You have to look at a performance by Christoph Waltz in Inglorious Basterds in order to fully comprehend why Jakob Cedergren, who plays town cop Robert Hansen in Terribly Happy, deserves his own spot on the world stage.

    Cedergren takes a character, an urban police offer who is exiled into a rural, remote village town after having a nervous breakdown, and twists it into a complex individual who has no predictability, no hints about what he’s going to do next. He’s thrilling to watch on screen as he is tasked with what ought to be a simple enough assignment: watch over a sleepy hollow where no one seems to even want official law enforcement. The town has its own rule of law, its own way of handling things, and Cedergren disturbs the natural order with his presence. He’s a cop who seems to engender not an ounce of intimidation or respect from the townsfolk but he does find a kindred spirit in a local woman who isn’t from around here, either, a woman with her own secrets.

    The pastoral themes abound in a town that wants to keep its close knit community closed off from interlopers looking to change things and Cedergren is absolutely dynamic in a role that showcases his range, not only in ability, but in the way his character vacillates throughout the film. When we meet him he’s Superman, a hero who is absolute in his convictions and black and white-ness, but, by the end of the movie, as the town’s secrets slowly give up its dead, it’s Batman that takes over. By the third act moral ambiguity becomes the predominant theme, the line between what’s right and what’s wrong blurs in ways that haven’t been seen in modern cinema in some time.

    Sure, to those who wonder whether director Henrik Ruben Genz’s film that deals with such ambiguity smacks of Cohen or Lynch-ian type of filmmaking would be right in postulating as such but that would be a disservice to a filmmaker who demonstrates his ability to craft a noir tale that does not relent. More importantly, Genz’s film is its own creation, living and breathing within this hermetically sealed world where oddity is subjective. For example, when we meet who is ostensibly the femme fatale of this thriller, Ingerlise (played by Lene Maria Christensen), she leans on Cedergren to help her escape her abusive husband Jørgen (Kim Bodnia). The outcome of what will be a face off between these two men will not only surprise you in its originality but will satisfy any filmgoer’s expectation to be entertained along with being jolted. The dark comedy that simmers below this film’s bleak palette is there but it exists only insofar in its subtlety. It won’t smack you or be ostentatious in order for you to recognize it but that’s the draw with filmmakers of this type. It makes you work for it but there is a payoff in the form of the movie’s themes.

    Such a theme, like subjugation, looms large when you consider the movie deals a lot with the idea of drowning a town’s dark secrets in its bogs. Literally. Bogs play a symbolic role but, again, its use is done with intelligence, not obviousness.

    The movie transcends its linguistic cadence that does take some getting used to but, once you give into how it is telling its story, the story is enveloping to the point of amazement. Amazement that this movie has flown underneath so many people’s radars because it offers so much sustenance to those hungry for a good story about a man who has to trade in some of his altruistic character in order to maintain some sense of normalcy in a town where absolutely nothing is normal.

    PERSONAL SHOUT OUT

    jane-doeNot that many of you would care but after 9 months of gestation I am utterly delighted and tickled to introduce my newest daughter Nina Elizabeth.

    Weighing in at a whopping 8 lbs. 10 oz. this little cannonball is the reason that I was not able to make it to this year’s San Diego Comic-Con. Believe me, she’ll hear about it for the rest of her natural born life but here’s to hoping it’s a long one…I’ve got a lot of guilt to sling her way.  As Will Smith said in Independence Day: Welcome to Erf.

  • Trailer Park: INCEPTION and LOOK AROUND YOU

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    Check out my other column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

    INCEPTION – Review

    inception-poster-2010

    A summer film that distills the best of what a blockbuster should be, INCEPTION is the thinking man’s action film that marries drama, wicked fast pacing, and the designation as the best big budget movie so far this year.

    In literature, Marcel Proust’s “The Remembrance Of Things” is thought of a classic because of its exploration of memory and the acute moments that are triggered by the nature of living. It’s a familiar smell, it’s a taste that triggers flashes from a time that has forgotten. It’s a wonderful distillation of the nature of the mind and how it is able to start lines of thought merely started by a bite of Madeline cookies, a sip of tea.

    To try and contain a review of Christopher Nolan’s masterstroke of space and time within the barriers of the written word is to not appreciate the multidimensional gambits he took in trying to make our own minds malleable. It’s a movie that brings together the talents of an ensemble that could not have been more well-crafted and chosen, a score that weaves its way into what’s happening on the screen as if it were the film’s sixth man that’s comes in at clutch moments, a directorial style that has all along been leading up to this moment, and a story that is nothing short of tight and lean.

    To talk about this film’s plot is to take away a layer of ignorance that any person wanting to steep themselves in this world would best avoid, but merely recapping its plot doesn’t do much to diminish the astonishing moments that pepper this film’s running time.

    Our protagonist Dom Cobb (Leonardo DiCaprio) is charged with one task in this film: plant a thought in a target’s mind and have them believe it to be his own. The mark here is Cillian Murphy who stars as Robert Fischer, Jr., a corporate player who Saito (Ken Watanabe) would like taken out of his way. The payoff, if this expert in thought extraction could do it, would allow DiCaprio to return to the U.S. a free man. What has kept him out of the country, what has kept him away from his children, what has made him a wanted man, is left for us to discover in small bits and bites on the way through the subconscious of Fischer, Jr.. Using a team that’s assembled of people that has more in common with Hermes than they do with the usual action movie tropes of ragtag mercenaries they all seem more likely to unwind with a glass of wine than they do handling the weaponry that takes this movie from being a clever idea and makes it a clever idea that might be Nolan’s best one yet.

    The literal cat and mouse game that ensues once we get the groundwork laid about what is real in this world, what its rules are, what is possible, is without question one that filmmakers have to look at and be amazed by. What Nolan was able to do with a supporting cast that includes Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Ellen Page, Marion Cotillard, Michael Caine, Tom Hardy and Tom Berenger is something of an art itself. He was able to make every person earn the right to be on the screen and to harmoniously fit in with one another. There are no standouts, with the exception of DiCaprio’s sublime yet thunderous performance, and Tom Hardy’s real coming out party, per se but that’s the brilliance of the film. As a team they make up so much more than the sum of its parts. The synchronicity they share with one another makes this an uninterrupted experience unlike anything you’re likely to see.

    What’s more, this film represents something about Nolan that many already know: he is passionate about telling a good story. Not just a story, but a good one. One that is airtight in its ability to thrill and excite you while also informing a part of human nature. All of his previous efforts are imbued with the small ways our humanity manifests itself in the acts of his protagonists and it’s no different here. Although, in this dream world the manifestations are literally interpreted on the screen, laying bare the psychoses that hobble everyone to some degree. Obviously here, a runaway train on the loose in a city street ought to be nothing less than spectacular if for no other reason than it is spectacular.

    But Nolan doesn’t go the easy route as these visuals mean something more than what they are. Every piece of broken glass, every ice cold look from a passerby, they mean more than just what you’re seeing with your own eyes. The deception of inception is that everything is in front of you, nothing is hidden. Every question is answered and that’s the brilliance. What makes your mind hurt by the end of the film as you try and wrap your own sense of logic around what you’ve been presented is how it’s all right there to be interpreted. Lesser directors have made it an art form to hide its secrets, to throw out red herrings to toss you off its scent, but it’s the scent that means everything to Nolan as he made a world that feels too real.

    It seems so simple that each and every one of us have a baseline with which to connect with this film. We all have to give in to our minds at night and at the very least allows for every person who sees this movie to understand, on some level, the totality of what’s going on. Examining the nature of memory was what made Marcel Proust such an unforgettable writer and it’s the very same thing that will make Christopher Nolan an unforgettable filmmaker.

    Look Around You – DVD Review

    look-around-you-checks-in-20100420112012536-000A television show that jettisons you back to an age when classroom instruction meant listening to an old coot ramble on about things that seemed antiquated to even the most basic of thinkers, Look Around You is a show that really isn’t for everyone.

    Who it is for, however, are those who like their comedy on the subtle side, the kind of funny that comes from the absurd. What writers Robert Popper and Peter Serafinowicz managed to do was bring a piece of scientific nostalgia from the past (think Bill Nye The Science Guy circa mid 1970’s) and give it a language all its own. Look Around You examines common, scientific topics like music, water or the brain in a way that feels like they’re coming at us from that time. From a narrative and editorial standpoint these episodes wouldn’t be nearly as funny until the very laws of logic are conveniently left out of the program’s creation.

    Very much like what Tim and Eric have managed to do for many, many seasons on Adult Swim, Popper and Serafinowicz deny you any chance to ground this straightforward science show in any kind of reality at all. It’s the mixture of the brilliant attention to detail and the ways in which these topics are covered as if it’s the gospel’s truth that make this a show that’s a must-see for any fan of alternative comedy.

    The joke isn’t that nothing is as it seems, this could be done by any fool looking to make fun of programming from when we were children, but that no one ever gives the punchline. It wants you to go halfway and meet it as an experiment, for example, on the brain ends with the brain in question being suspended in brine and hooked up to a telephone making a phone call to the experiment conducting scientist to say how many nuts are in a jar that’s sitting in front of it. It’s truly bizarre but it’s bold in that it never feels the need to accentuate anything, nothing that would let anyone know this is all a big put-on. The level of restraint shown on this program only shows how serious they were taking this premise, of crafting a very short program of bogus science information that’s presented as if it were the truth, is something I rarely see. Performers want to let the audience in, to get them in on the joke. Look Around You is amazing in that it doesn’t give you anything but situations that you can either take or leave. It’s up to you to find the humor in the situation and that’s more than anyone could ask for out of comedians operating on another level.

    About the DVD:

    Look Around You is the BAFTA-nominated comedy series based on the unforgettable Open University and Television for Schools programs of the1970s. Through a series of gloriously deadpan experiments, we observe a colony of ants build an igloo, receive a telephone call from abrain, discover why ghosts can’t whistle, and reveal the largest number in the world. Science has never been so silly.

    Special Features –

    Advanced double-length module: Calcium
    Little Mouse: full-length pop video
    New exclusive commentaries featuring Robert Popper, Peter Serafinowicz, Tim Kirkby, Simon Pegg, Nick Frost, Edgar Wright, Trey Parker and Matt Stone, Michael Cera, Jonah Hill, and Tim & Eric
    Little Mouse commentary by Jack Morgan (BSc)
    Pages from Ceefax
    Play-at-home quiz pages
    Additional music by Gelg
    Test card

  • Trailer Park: DESPICABLE ME

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    Check out my other column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

    DESPICABLE ME -Review

    despicableme_posterThe issue with Despicable Me isn’t so much that it’s a good, albeit mediocre, kids film but it is the film’s contentment with just being average that genuinely holds the movie back from being anything more than forgettable.

    With Steve Carell starring as our baddie with a soft spot for small girls, Gru, and Jason Segel as a true nemesis for our nemesis, Vector, the perceived talent is ultimately wasted on a script that depends too much on forced sentimentality where there is none and a sub-plot that seems wholly inserted just to pad out a story that is wafer thin as it already is.

    Primarily, the tale of an evil mastermind who adopts three orphans under false pretenses in order to get at Vector, a new villain who is usurping this old man at every opportunity, and who surreptitiously steals an item that Gru himself was pilfering at the time, goes nowhere. As that plot fizzles like a wet bottle rocket, screenwriters Cinco Paul and Ken Daurio (both of Horton Hears a Who! and The Santa Clause 2 notoriety) insert these three orphan girls as a way to build a story about self-confidence and caring. The girls, as well, have become the centerpiece of a marketing plan that finally was able to shed some light on the question many people have had as this film neared release: What is this movie about?

    Truly, this movie doesn’t know what it wants to be about, quite honestly. At one time it’s a cheeky throwback to spy films long gone, Carell rolling out his best Boris impersonation from Rocky and Bullwinkle, while  at other times it’s a hackneyed yarn about what it means to feel compassion and love when all you’ve known is how to be a villain. Believe me, the irony of the screenwriters ripping a thematic page out of Dr. Seuss’ The Grinch Who Stole Christmas after they themselves worked on a Seuss adaptation isn’t lost on me but the story is as translucent as its characters. Segel for his part proves you don’t need any finesse, or subtlety for that matter, in order to voice a character in an animated film. His speaking parts seem out of place with the mouth moving on the screen as there is no inflection, no passion for creating a truly obnoxious Bill Gates-ian kind of villain. This only compounds the real problem of this movie and it’s that in an age where every single animated movie is falling short of its Pixar counterpart you are witness to the disparities in quality from one film to another. Like an essay in school that needed to be compared and contrasted, you can see that while the animation is somewhat on par there is a reason those lamp loving animators are going home with golden statuettes year after year after year.

    For example, in Toy Story 3, the moment when Buzz and Woody are in danger of being melted like marshmallows at a campfire. The music by Michael Giacchino complements the emotional punch that’s tightly shot by director Lee Unkrich. It works to draw your feelings out because everything was accounted for and executed right. Contrasting that, we get moments between Gru and the orphans that don’t earn their emotional cash-in. The composition by Heitor Pereira doesn’t work or help tie anything together in a meaningful way. It’s as if you have all these moving pieces that want to act independently of one another and what you get is exactly what this is and that’s a mediocre movie that thinks it wants to be a movie about overcoming past emotional roadblocks or a movie about turning a corner in your life in order to love something other than yourself or it’s a movie about these small little yellow creatures called minions.

    But let’s talk about the minions for a moment. All things being equal, the minions would still edge out everything else in this film for bring the funniest thing your kids will see this month. These adorable little creatures thankfully steal the movie away from all of their co-stars and they barely are able to say a word. Who cares about wondering why there are dozens of them scurrying about, the true delight is that they bring so much levity and slapstick humor to a movie that desperately needed it. It’s the minions who ought to have been the focus of the film, the story from their perspective would have such a more interesting creation than we have here which is all about Gru’s obsession to shrink the moon to show the world his capacity for true evil, but I understand the aim of the film. It’s not looking to reshape animation or redefine it in any way, I get that, but when you have others in this animated space showing you how films like this can be done you have to be disappointed when films like this fall just short of the mark.

    Not that any of this matters, I get that as well. The movie will make millions upon millions and will probably result in sequels and spin-offs galore. (I’ll be anxiously awaiting a poorly animated Nickelodeon series based on the lives of the minions which will probably be truly awful as they’re the edgiest thing about this film) Success here is absolutely quantifiable and that is why this movie is an unquestionable hit. I may not like the way it meanders towards an ending we all see coming from the moment this film begins but the kids will enjoy it for what it is while I see it for exactly what it is.

  • Trailer Park: ICE ROAD TRUCKERS, GREEN ZONE, BLOOD ON THE HIGHWAY, MARY AND MAX, HOW THE EARTH WAS MADE: SEASON 2, IT CAME FROM KUCHAR

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    Check out my other column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

    ICE ROAD TRUCKERS – DVD Review

    ice-roadI once had a job where it was my job to obtain truck freight.

    As I made my way all across the US I realized that everything that we get in this country is obtained by the trucking industry. Bottom line. From the keyboards that you and I write on, the chairs we sit in, the produce and food we eat, the clothes we wear, everything gets here by truck.

    That’s why knowing this information makes for a good primer in understanding why Season Three of Ice Road Truckers is such a thrill to watch. While not necessarily family entertainment, some of these road dogs are a bit salty, the program continues to feed my appetite for good reality television and I’ll tell you why: these are people who literally live like the people from The Deadliest Catch. They live their lives one mile at a time and are always looking for ways to make some extra dough. They may not have a place where they clock in 9 to 5 but they know they can beef up their paycheck on any given day just by doing whatever it takes to go some extra distance.

    This season is filled with the usual fare you’ve come to expect from the previous two seasons but, I’m telling you, in Blu-ray the whites of the ice and the black of the road that chunks up from time to time just pops right off the screen. The net effect of which is you getting a frightening feel for just how sharp you have to be to do this job. While it doesn’t take a college degree to drive a truck it does take someone with a little finesse to know exactly what their rig can and can’t do. This disc was an absolute delight to watch and it, honestly, will be put into rotation because it’s just that compelling.

    About the program:

    Just when you thought trucking couldn’t get more dangerous”¦ICE ROAD TRUCKERS: THE COMPLETE SEASON THREE BLU-RAY EDITION brings you to the most treacherous landscape on earth: northern Alaska.

    In Prudhoe Bay (250 miles north of the Arctic Circle), a network of ice roads in the tundra crisscross river systems and open ocean to connect America’s booming North Slope oil fields to dry land. Every winter, truckers have less than three months to shuttle critical supplies over the ice. The only problem is there’s just one way to get to this remote location: 400 miles of ice-covered, mountainous terrain known as the Dalton Highway. The Dalton is the lifeline to Alaska’s oil industry. It’s also the most dangerous road in North America and has claimed the lives of more than 400 people since it was built just 30 years ago. The next chapter in the hit HISTORYâ„¢ series returns this season with veteran drivers Hugh Rowland and Alex Debogorski, new drivers (including the show’s first female trucker) and more heart-stopping adrenaline than ever before.

    BLOOD ON THE HIGHWAY – DVD Review

    bloodWords escape me when describing the fun I had watching this film.

    I know it’s kind of en-vogue to make a movie look like it was shot for $5,000 but this movie isn’t being ironic. It wants to embrace its indie vibe and exploit everything in it for maximum effect.

    The plot isn’t relevant here as the movie swirls around a bunch of young adults on their way to a concert only to find themselves in a town populated by real dumb vampires. On paper, this shouldn’t work. On paper, this is the most ridiculous idea ever conceived for a movie looking to take advantage of the current wave of vampire inspired programming.

    But it works. It works real well.

    A movie like this succeeds because of its attention to good fundamentals when it comes to low budget horror directing and it takes the spot in my Top 5 of 2010 so far of horror films that know how to express themselves honestly. Whether you have a low budget or a high budget what should ultimately matter is what you do with the money and I’m betting dollars to doughnuts these kids spent their money on fake blood because there is a lot of it here. As well, the movie succeeds because it’s genuinely funny in the way some of the best Troma films were back in the day. I found myself laughing at some parts but, really, it was finding myself enjoying watching some filmmakers know what they’re doing which was the most satisfying part.

    If you can find this on Netflix rent it and watch it as I am 99% certain you will find something to like in this movie which just oozes passion from those who made it.

    About the program:

    If you’re looking for more blood, gore and vampires than Twilight and Saw put together topped off with a hefty dose of laugh-out-loud comedy, you’re in for a delectable treat with horror film festival favorite BLOOD ON THE HIGHWAY, making its DVD debut this June!

    Featuring hilarious cameos from genre favorites Nicholas Brendon (“Buffy the Vampire Slayer,” “Criminal Minds”) and Tom Towles (Halloween, The Devil’s Rejects), BLOOD ON THE HIGHWAY tells the blood-and-gore-ridden tale of three maladjusted twenty-somethings (Deva George, Nate Rubin and Robin Gierhart). While on their way to a rock concert, the trio accidentally wanders into a town populated by bloodthirsty, dim-witted vampires. With no way to escape, they join the last remaining humans and prepare for an all-out, no-holds-barred battle with an army of the undead.

    Called “a Texas vampire opus” by Fangoria, BLOOD ON THE HIGHWAY amassed numerous cult credentials during 2008-09 including: Winner, B-Movie Film Festival, Best Feature; Winner, Atlanta Underground, Best Horror Feature; Winner, Madison Horror Film Festival, Best Feature; Winner, Kimera Film Festival, Best Fantastic Feature; and Winner, Shockfest Film Festival, Best Feature; and was honored as an Official Selection at the AFI Dallas Film Festival, Fantaspoa Fantastic Film Festival (Brazil), Bram Stoker Film Festival (England), Hollywood Film Festival, San Antonio Film Festival, Shockerfest International Film Festival, Horrific Film Festival, Atlanta Horror Film Festival and Haapsalu Horror and Fantasy Film Festival (Estonia).

    MARY AND MAX – DVD Review

    mary-and-max_2d_hFilmmaker Adam Elliot is a master storyteller and has the Oscar gold to prove it but Mary and Max is perhaps his true masterpiece.

    A film about pen pals who live on separate continents is so much more than a friendly back and forth narrative about their lives. The contents of this film are indeed not meant for young viewers but the contents of this film speak to the human condition of release, of wanting to be understood, of needing someone to simply hear them that there isn’t another film about loneliness I would rather have as a reference. It’s simply spectacular filmmaking from an animator who knows what the medium is capable of and pushes it to limits where bridging the gap between the perceived fiction of clay people is transformed into believability.

    While on the surface there is something strange about an 8 year-old girl who is having a rough go at life in Australia starting a pen pal relationship with a 44 year-old single man in New York who has own emotional maladies but it works wonderfully.

    Through the course of the film we get to see these individuals mature as people and it’s, I would posit, life affirming in a way to see how these two strangers come together in a way that’s unexpected but yet satisfying on so many levels. Adam Elliot, as well, should be seen as a Svengali when it comes to harnessing the abilities of claymation in a way that not only show up Nick Park with all the attention to detail that Elliot puts into this film but he also should be seen as having that ineffable quality that Pixar films have when they’re at their tear-jerking best: he understands there needs to be a connection with the characters and the people watching these characters. He does this better than most everyone else who toils in animation looking for a franchise or a “hit.”

    This is a hit simply based on how long it lingers with you long after you see it.

    About the program:

    A chance “meeting” changes two lives forever in the extraordinary claymation feature MARY AND MAX, starring Philip Seymour Hoffman, Toni Collette and Eric Bana. The full-length debut by the Oscar-winning director of Harvie Krumpet and Writer-director Adam Elliot brings the unique stop-motion style feature about the unlikeliest of friendships. In 1970s suburban Melbourne, lonely 8-year-old Mary Daisy Dinkle (voiced by Bethany Whitmore, and later by Oscar nominee and Emmy winner Toni Collette of The United States of Tara), the only child of an alcoholic mother and a distant father, picks a name at random out of a Manhattan phone book and writes to him. The recipient is Max Jerry Horovitz (Oscar winner Philip Seymour Hoffman, Capote), an obese 44-year-old single man who, despite suffering from the behavioral disorder Asperger’s syndrome, responds in kind.

    HOW THE EARTH WAS MADE: SEASON 2 – DVD Review

    earthI had no idea what to tell my daughter when she asked how the Grand Canyon was made here in Arizona.

    I live here in a desert, it’s hot out, what on earth could possibly have carved out a crevasse as wide and as deep as the hole up there in the northern part of the state. After watching the episode dedicated to actually showing me the erosion and how the Colorado River factored into it I can honestly say that now I know.

    Many of you already know how slow I am when it comes to having knowledge dropped on me of an academic nature. I really have to pay attention, sometimes squint a little in order to funnel at that information into my brain, but this is what makes How The Earth Was Made series such a blast to watch with the kids. Instead of giving half-cocked answers that are probably wrong the History channel yet again is able to take some serious looks at the prevailing theories and physical evidence and make them real.

    With talking heads that don’t bore you, with visuals that actually tell the story for guys like me who need to be shown a shiny object for me to get it, HTEWM succeeds where others fail in that it makes it, gasp, entertaining. I didn’t like science growing up but I am attune to what’s being said, for example, when they explain how Mt. St. Helens came to be simply because they know they need to set themselves apart from the stuffy guys who get paid by universities to bore students to death with the academics of it all.

    By no means fluff, and certainly not a definitive dissertation on why their explanation is 100% accurate with no room for dissension, this series is something that the kids can enjoy watching along with their parents (I certainly appreciate programming like that) or that can be causally enjoyed by your average person who just wants to watch a wonderfully produced program about the Earth we live on. Cannot recommend this one enough.

    About the program:

    Spectacular on-location shooting, evidence from geologists in the field, and clear, dramatic graphics combine in HOW THE EARTH WAS MADE: THE COMPLETE SEASON TWO to show how immensely powerful, and at times violent, forces of geology have formed our planet. The stunning series from HISTORYâ„¢ peels back layers of rock, fills up river canyons, parts the oceans and investigates awe-inspiring formations on 4 DVDs featuring all Season Two episodes.

    This season, HOW THE EARTH WAS MADE goes back in history ““ from 4.5 billion years ago to today ““to investigate the origins of some of the most well-known locations and geological phenomena in the world. With rocks as their clues and volcanoes, ice sheets and colliding continents as their suspects, scientists launch a forensic investigation that will help viewers visualize how the Earth has evolved and formed over millions of years. Mt. Everest, Grand Canyon, Yosemite, Mt. St. Helens, Death Valley and Supervolcanoes are among the fascinating geological creations featured across 13 episodes of this innovative program.

    IT CAME FROM KUCHAR – DVD Review

    kucharBizarre.

    If you could suppose who Tim and Eric were inspired by growing up I would have to imagine that saying “The Kuchar brothers” would be a dead lock for a right answer. A film dedicated to showing how two brothers shook up the world of underground filmmaking this documentary which really delivers on showing two guys who never gave up on their passion.

    What’s remarkable about this movie is that you see how these kinds of people inspire others to do great work of their own. It’s not that they never had great success in their careers but, rather, they made other artists see the possibilities in things based on the work that these two guys put out there.

    I certainly never heard of them before watching this film but watching their process and how they navigate their own film sets you begin to understand that these are not two eccentric men on a mission to triumph over the commercialism of film; they are two men, however, who know what they like and want to keep making films based on these likes. They seem undaunted in their quest to pump out movie after movie and it’s watching them go through the motions of making these things where you understand that for as long as they’ve been making these little films not a lot of people have watched they’re filled with the need, the drive to make more.

    In a way this is a testament to people’s dreams and what it takes to realize them because they’re doing it. They’re living with it. John Waters and Buck Henry all have their own say about these movies but after watching this documentary I wasn’t left thinking here are a pair of weirdos. The label is my projection when, in fact, they are operating on a creative level I can only hope to attain someday. These are men among boys and this documentary ought to be required viewing for anyone wanting to know what kind of passion you have to have to make films because they have it by the truckload.

    About the program:

    Long before YouTube, there were the brilliantly insane, no-budget movies of underground, filmmaking twins George and Mike Kuchar. Ceating stars out of their friends and family with just consumer-grade cameras, the teenage Kuchar brothers went from the 1960’s New York City underground film scene of Andy Warhol and Kenneth Anger to become the twin maestros of B-movie glamour and sleaze. This June, join IndiePix as they celebrate the wildly warped world of these inimitable auteurs with IT CAME FROM KUCHAR. Debuting on DVD following a highly successful film festival/theatrical run, don’t miss this special collector’s edition piling on more than 45 minutes of behind-the-scenes footage, additional interviews, footage and secrets from the Kuchar Brothers fascinating and bizarre world.

    In a mesmerizing stream-of-consciousness style, IT CAME FROM KUCHAR effortlessly weaves nostalgic footage of 1950’s New York, a “greatest hits” collection of Kuchar clips and present day interviews of an all-star lineup of fans including John Waters, Buck Henry, Atom Egoyan, Wayne Wang, Bill Griffith, Gerard Malanga, B. Ruby Rich and Guy Maddin. Both outrageous and lovable, George and Mike will inspire you to pick up a camera and start making movies. IT CAME FROM KUCHAR is a must see for lovers of film everywhere.

    GREEN ZONE – DVD GIVEAWAY

    the-green-zone-cover-3This is a great contest for some lucky readers out there and I’ll tell you why: this movie was marketed by someone who got it in their head to spin as a what if. What if Jason Bourne ended up in a warzone?

    The film couldn’t have been any different and the box office suffered for it. Luckily, the movie is a tight thriller that does not relent. I know there are some issues with pacing and at times the story is a little convoluted but, overall, this movie is a standout in a year with so-so and mediocre releases.

    If you would like a chance to win one of these things just shoot me your name and address to Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com. While you’re at it, and to try and weed out those who would lazily just shoot in an entry, let me know your favorite Matt Damon film.

    About the film:

    Matt Damon and director Paul Greengrass (The Bourne Supremacy, The Bourne Ultimatum, United 93) re-team for their latest electrifying thriller
    in Green Zone, a film set in the chaotic early days of the Iraqi War when no one could be trusted and every decision could detonate unforeseen consequences.

    During the U.S.-led occupation of Baghdad in 2003, Chief Warrant Officer Roy Miller (Damon) and his team of Army inspectors were dispatched to find weapons of mass destruction believed to be stockpiled in the Iraqi desert. Rocketing from one booby-trapped and treacherous site to the next, the men search for deadly chemical agents but stumble instead upon an elaborate cover-up that inverts the purpose of their mission.

    Spun by operatives with intersecting agendas, Miller must hunt through covert and faulty intelligence hidden on foreign soil for answers that will either clear a rogue regime or escalate a war in an unstable region. And at this blistering time and in this combustible place, he will find the most elusive weapon of all is the truth.

  • Trailer Park: CYRUS, THE MAID, BURMA VJ, and A BOY AND HIS DOG

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    Check out my other column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

    Cyrus: Instant Cult Classic – Ray Schillaci

    cyrus-poster-480x717Run to the theaters before this gem is lost in the summer shuffle. “Cyrus” is the best comedy of the year. It may be the best comedy of this decade, because we have not seen anything like it since the outrageousness of such underground subversive classics as “Harold and Maude” and “Where’s Poppa?” Now mind you, I know those movies are not for every taste, but my lord what a breath of fresh air “Cyrus” is. Both uncomfortable and downright hilarious at the same time, “Cyrus” soars to the heights of cult classic with the combination of talents; its three stars John C Reilly, Jonah Hill, Marisa Tomei and writers/directors Mark and Jay Duplass.

    The great thing about “Cyrus” is that it never quite goes over the top like some of the comedies of late. There are scenes that are awkward and make one uneasy, but we end up too busy laughing to dwell on it. As much of a Judd Apatow fan that I am, I find some of the gags, just that ““ gags. The grossness of the gag puts the brakes on the story and character. “Cyrus” is wonderfully underplayed and works beautifully. It takes a very bizarre situation and puts real people in it and allows the audience to enjoy it. In some ways, it has actually tapped into the strange attraction to reality TV in the way the whole subject matter is handled.

    John C. Reilly plays John, a middle-age dysfunctional, anti-social loser who still lives with his ex-wife (in separate rooms), Jamie, played to perfection by Catherine Keener. Jamie is about to be remarried and attempts to get John out of his room and her house. She and her fiancé encourage John to join them at a party so he can mingle and maybe meet somebody. The result is John making an ass out of himself by being way too open and awkward. But one sweetheart, Molly played by Tomei, at the party actually finds some redeeming value in John and semi-invites him into her life.

    Problem being; Molly has a secret ““ a very unusual relationship with her 21-year-old son (still living with her) that puts the kabash on anything that remotely appears to be an adult relationship. Enter Cyrus, Jonah Hill’s best performance ever. Hill is not used as a sight gag or somebody we wait to emit the laugh lines. This is a deep, 3 dimensional look into a seriously disturbed person that at times almost makes us feel that he could be capable of just about anything ““ including violence. Don’t misinterpret, Hill is funny but in a very dark sense. It’s an edgy representation that fuels the other performances and it’s what keeps us watching with baited breath. Cyrus is more dysfunctional than John, manipulating and totally into mindf*@#ing his opponents for his mother’s attention.

    Everything that John goes through to keep the relationship and try to deal with Cyrus while growing as a mature adult himself is worth the price of admission. John C. Reilly has proved on several occasions how well he can convey the life of a loser. But in “Cyrus,” Mr. Reilly brings a genuine angst and a wonderful touch of someone truly fighting his inner child that so many men deal with. It is such a beautifully natural portrayal that it’s almost a crime to even think of it as a performance.

    Then there is Marisa Tomei’s character that is caught in the middle. She’s not entirely blameless for the way Cyrus is. She is both frustrating and endearing trying to appease the mess that has been created. She wants to be a woman again and longs for an adult relationship while being afraid to let go of her over 200lb baby boy, funny and touching. I believe Ms. Tomei is one of the most under-appreciated talents in the business. She has a tendency to imbue her characters with an uncomfortable honesty while remaining sexy and fun at the same time and it works to perfection in this film.

    What makes this movie so damn hysterical is how blatantly honest it is. The characters actually say things that you think you’d say but maybe it would be too hurtful. It isn’t, it’s necessary and political correctness is thrown out the window with glee. This is a wonderfully adult comedy that hearkens back to the golden days of Hal Ashby (Harold and Maude, Being There). Jay and Mark Duplass are to be commended for such a brave film during these overtly politically correct times. There is nothing more to say without giving away all the wonderful surprises except, “Cyrus” is priceless.

    The Maid – DVD Review

    the_maid_posterA movie that, on the surface, looks like it does not say much The Maid is a wonderfully deceptive movie about one woman’s life who seems so much a part of, yet detached from, one family’s journey. Somewhat taken for granted by the family that employs her, the maid Raquel (Catalina Saavedra) simply is a fondly thought of woman who helps act as the rudder for the lives she literally cleans up after.

    While the movie shows this dour, and many times morose, woman navigate her life in relation to the family the film is a delicate portrait of someone who has so intertwined their being with the work they do that it becomes nearly impossible to separate the two. While everyone else is able to enjoy the pleasures of swimming or ping pong, as the children are wont to do on this movie, Raquel’s world is the home. There is no refuge. Her room feels and is shot, through the warm eye of Chilean director Sebastián Silva, like it is her own cell. A prison of her own making but, and this important, she equally finds comfort in her role however diminutive it is in relation to everyone else in the family.

    The real treat in this film is seeing how Raquel reacts when the family decides to employ another maid to help out around the home. In almost slapstick fashion Silva creates an environment of bizarre and hilarious moments that juxtapose well with Raquel’s sour disposition at the mere thought or implication that she is being replaced after so many years with the family. She isn’t and she’s not but it’s the idea of it that sends Raquel into a mental tailspin where she is leading maids out the front door so she can lock them out or sending another so much into a torturous rage that the viewed interloper scales the family home just to make it to the backyard, though the back door, and upstairs in order to give Raquel a proper thrashing. Others meet the same passive aggression but it’s not until we meet yet another maid, Lucy (Mariana Loyola), where things turn and the film becomes something so much more than just the defrosting of a frigid woman.

    It’s equally sad and funny but I would assert that it’s Silva who wants it that way. It would be too easy to have a movie where you have a character like Raquel represent class struggle and all the metaphors you want to heap on top of her but that would be doing the movie an injustice. You certainly can see that in this film but the movie becomes much more enjoyable when you consider the nuances of personality that Saavedra is able to channel through her face. So forlorn yet still capable of so much humanity the movie undermines your expectations and delivers a movie that is rich in character, spirit, and the strength inherent in the belief that work should not define who we are, we should define it for ourselves.

    About the film:

    After 23 years working as a devoted maid in an upper class Chilean household, embittered and ailing Raquel (Sundance Film Festival and Gotham Award winner Catalina Saavedra) can no longer care for the family alone. Trapped by guilt, matriarch Pilar (Claudia Celedón) refuses to let Raquel go, even though it is clear their longtime maid is slowly unraveling. Instead, Pilar hires more help, throwing Raquel into a jealous frenzy. The seemingly happy home soon becomes the stage for Raquel’s dirty tricks as she attempts to drive away anyone who threatens to take her place with darkly comedic, and in the end, endearing results.

    DVD Features

    Behind the scenes video clips with the cast and crew

    From Sketch to Screen ““ a video comparison of storyboards to scenes

    Photos from Sebastián Silva

    BURMA VJ – DVD Review

    burmaForget about the easy lines of “The revolution will be televised” when seeing a movie about the tyrannical rule exerted by the forces of the Burmese military junta that suppress any public declaration questioning their authority. You think marching around your town with a picket sign is the work of brave people? Try doing it in that country.

    Burma VJ, shot with handheld devices, small digital cameras, objects that have gloriously allowed people to inconspicuously shoot video, stands as a document for those who want to see what true oppression can do to a populace. What you initially notice about those who would try and demonstrate is that, at first, no one really notices or cares to. One moment they’re out telling people about the grave injustices done to them by their government and all seems well. But it’s not until you see the plain clothes, government stooges round any dissenter up with the kind of speed and inconspicuousness of a shoplifter, that you start to see this is the stuff of bogeymen. Watching what could be an ordinary person on the street literally pull you through the street, throw you on the back of a truck, swallow you in the congested traffic of the city, possibly never to be heard from again, it’s then when you realize how frightening it must be for these people on a daily basis to simply exist.

    The film chronicles many stories just like this, narrated by a man simply known as Joshua, whose true identity is kept secret due to his involvement with the pro-democracy movement, and exposes the supposed government as a ruling force that not wants to stay in power but will do anything to stay there. From the aforementioned kidnappings, let’s call them what they are, to soldiers who open fire on a gathering of many, Burma VJ is a collection of clips and recordings that show you the true cruelty of oppression.

    The movie, directed by award-winning Anders Østergaard, is not only a story of how one regime can keep a population down but yet it’s also conscious of how technology can televise a revolution. While it seems that the proliferation of modern accouterments of daily life would help make a world aware of the cruel and inhumane things done to citizens of Burma the reason why this film even exists is because people are unaware, or are ignoring, the plight of so many. While some moments are blurry, intelligible, or confusing there is nonetheless a certain kind of outrage that steadily builds as you watch this documentary. It’s a documentary that shows you the power of the 21st century that can, for the first time, tell this story in living color but it’s also a testament to how far some regimes will go to keep people from standing up, from speaking out. It’s truly inspiring in a way that doesn’t seem forced or manipulated as the whole point of the movie is to tell this story from those who were there, who are still there, living in fear of a government that could make them disappear should it find out who these individuals are.

    It’s something that’s frightening and comforting at the same time, knowing that the fight still rages on certainly inspires but knowing this document now exists for others to witness is a small victory for those looking for change.

    About the film:

    Anders Østergaard’s award-winning documentary shows a rare inside look into the 2007 uprising in Myanmar through the cameras of the independent journalist group, Democratic Voice of Burma.

    While 100,000 people (including 1,000s of Buddhist monks) took to the streets to protest the country’s repressive regime that has held them hostage for over 40 years, foreign news crews were banned to enter and the Internet was shut down. The Democratic Voice of Burma, a collective of 30 anonymous and underground video journalists (VJs) recorded these historic and dramatic events on handycams and smuggled the footage out of the country, where it was broadcast worldwide via satellite. Risking torture and life imprisonment, the VJs vividly document the brutal clashes with the military and undercover police ““ even after they themselves become targets of the authorities.

    DVD Features

    Audio commentary with BURMA VJ director Anders Østergaard and film critic John Anderson

    FIGHTING FOR FREEDOM ““ a video interview with BURMA VJ “Joshua”

    Burmese Monks’ stories from the uprisings televised on Democratic Voice of Burma

    A video message from Richard Gere

    CROSSING MIDNIGHT ““ a riveting film about refugees on the Thai/Burma border

    Worth Reviving: A Boy and His Dog – Ray Schillaci

    boy_and_his_dog_ver2It’s been far too long since I’ve treated all of you to a dip into the revival pool. So I had to dig down deep to exonerate myself with something so fun, titillating (love that word ““ it brings out the eight-year-old boy in me) and downright obscure that perhaps you will find this piece worthy enough to continue on with. In today’s words “A Boy and his Dog” is the shits!

    Even by today’s standards it is still subversive. At first glance, it could be passed on as just another post-apocalyptic tale. But wait, it’s taken from a story by Harlan Ellison and known as the inspiration to the “Mad Max/Road Warrior” movies. Aside from that how would one bark balk at an allegory involving man having a telepathic communication with his best friend (his dog) and hunting down meals for him as the dog reciprocates by hunting for women (not for a meaningful relationship). The best part ““ this is done long before the overuse of computer generated talking animals. So we forego the cutesy animated lips that Disney and so many others perpetrate on the animal kingdom.

    This also stars a very young, pre-Miami Vice, Don Johnson, playing a none-too-bright, wide eyed horn dog. Johnson, along with the rest of the cast (including Jason Robards and a very funny Tim McIntire as the voice of the dog) is spot on with this apocalyptic satire. Johnson is Vic, a ragtag dimwitted loner, who is consistently losing a battle of wits with his telepathic pooch, Blood. One can easily tell the influence this film has had on films from “Mad Max” to “Book of Eli”. That wonderful desolate world-has-gone-to-shit look, trash and all perpetrates through a good part of the film. Those who are not savage are ravaged.

    Avoiding other marauders, hunting down food and women, poorly, Vic stumbles upon the yummy Quilla June Holmes, played by Susanne Benton (see Playboy cover May 1970). She’s not like the other women who have suffered through the apocalypse. Ms. Benton, back then, was what young men’s wet dreams were made of. Quilla is a heartthrob mystery woman who leads Vic to a secret underground society that appears right out of Stepfordville. Interesting side note; both “A Boy and his Dog” and the original “Stepford Wives” were released in 1975. But the former was written earlier in 1969. The funny thing is, just when you think you have this film pegged, it takes a wild darker tone once Vic enters the underground hometown. Don’t want to give too much away since there are several double-take moments that have you want to hit the pause button and say to yourself, “You’ve got to be kidding me!”

    Although an independent cheapie at the time, “A Boy and his Dog” is a biting masterful piece of work capturing the true essence of Harlan Ellison. Direction is tight and creative, and the cinematography is perfect, capturing both the post apocalyptic world and the underground society with a hint of “Twilight Zone.” Acting is wonderful with Jason Robards giving a fantastic low-key performance. But what it really comes down to is not the chemistry between luscious Susanne Benton and Don Johnson, which is fine, but the near comic timing between Johnson and the dog. It’s wonderfully and refreshingly adult with a hint of bringing out the juvenile in the male species.

    This is not a date movie! Do not make that mistake. The ending will have guys roar and women cringe. It’s misogynistic and hilarious, and it’s meant to be to the fullest degree. This film was done during a time when people were not so uptight and politically correct. It’s also hard to see how it could be remade in our time. But somebody has the asinine notion to attempt such a defeat. I just heard that David Lee Miller (My Suicide) is now attached and making an animated film out of this. If you ask me (for what it’s worth) this is as wrong-minded as Joel Silver’s decision to remake Don Quixote with the fantasies being real. That negates Cervantes’ whole work. Of course, what does a literary genius like Silver care if there may be a few million bucks in it and a toy franchise? Either way, rent or buy “A Boy and his Dog” and be the judge. This film should not be remade; it’s as classic to the underground, cult movement of the seventies as Wizard of Oz is an endearing classic of its time.

  • Trailer Park: Reed Cowan of 8: THE MORMON PROPOSITION

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    Check out my other column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

    Reed Cowan, Director of 8: The Mormon Proposition – Interview

    fullsize8A movie like this is vitally important to the dialogue process.

    There are certain things in this world where there is a definite understanding that it simply cannot last. When it came to discrimination at the turn of the last century it was fine to turn away people based on which country they came from, at the mid-century mark we thought there was nothing wrong with separating people based on the color of their skin, and even now there are people who think that discriminating against individuals based on their sexual orientation is OK. The fact that the two former facts are now seen a egregiously backward and a blemish on the face of the humanity we seem to embrace here in America is appalling when you consider that it’s still en vogue to base legislation and opposition to a normal, tax-paying segment of the population who want nothing more than to be joined in matrimony.

    It’s equally appalling to think that some in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Mormons for those needing a shorthand, would mount a political attack to overturn California’s already sanctioned same-sex, constitutional right, to marry. Again, it was already a state supreme court decision and this one proposition changed everything.

    Documentary filmmaker Reed Cowan, a former Mormon raised in the faith, looked deep into this issue and came out with a film that is at once informative and infuriating. Not enough people were out there to care last November, as the tumult this threatened to cause thousands didn’t stop this from passing but this film should serve as the first step in showing people that these gay men, gay women, are people, are human beings. We will look back at these kinds of egregious political acts as the behavior of cowards but it still remains to be seen how many more years we will have to wait until we accept everyone as equal. Until then, films like this need to be made in order to show that stupidity is still alive and well in this country.

    8: The Mormon Proposition is now playing. Check the official site to see if it’s appearing near you.

    CHRISTOPHER STIPP: Please let me get right down to the film itself. I was really interested, at least reading about the movie that this movie started out as sort of a documentary on the homeless gay teen issue in Utah and that this issue took on a life of its own. What was the flash point for you to say, “You know what? I think I’m making the wrong movie.”

    club-jam-hosts-reed-cowan-and-the-mormon-proposition-posterCOWAN: I think it was the combination of “What’s the real problem here” and the real problem is bigotry spoken over the pulpit, right?

    CS: Right.

    COWAN: And so we felt that really made sense and so while we were in the production of the homeless angle we became consumed with Proposition 8. So we felt sort of like an historic imperative to back-off and reassess and put our cameras where they needed to be and that was Proposition 8 and that was a wild ride. Because the discovery that happened after that was so shocking to me. So shocking.

    CS: And I think the movie’s main thrust, and certainly one of the things that comes up, is that it is a movie about trying to create dialogue than it is about trying to point a finger. Looking back at the experience of making the film do you think that true dialogue can still happen with the church?

    COWAN: I believe it can happen and I believe it is happening. And I know that it’s happening in people’s homes all over California, especially. I know it’s happening all over the country where people are beginning to talk about what happened because I think Mormons share a part, and there are many, and are beginning to see that this is causing a division and with good Mormons that I know of who aren’t like that. They bristle at the thought that this would cause a division. I think there is a beautiful minority who are beginning to step forward and say, “We caused pain and we have to dissect it and vow to never let this happen again.”

    CS: I was really impressed with the narration of [Oscar winning writer of Milk] Dustin Lance Black. As well as Steven Greenstreet, who did the wonderful documentary Killer At Large who I actually interviewed a couple of years ago. How did these people attach themselves to the picture? Obviously, it’s great that they did, but how did the become aware of it?

    COWAN: Well, first of all, Dustin Lance Black”¦.I’m a journalist and I’m aware of a young girl in the Midwest who was doing her school project on Harvey Milk and her teachers would not allow her to bring that to class and, of course, that made the news. So, I contacted him on his Facebook page and asked if he would have any interest in talking to this girl because I think she would really be bolstered by you talking to her and he responded and out of that grew a friendship and he began to see the research and work I was doing on this film and when the time was right I asked him if he would participate and he interrupted filming on What’s Wrong With Virginia, he’s almost wrapped with it now, he interrupted production to narrate this film. So, that’s how that happened.

    Steven Greenstreet came on the scene for me about halfway through my process. I had found online that he did a piece for AmericanNewsProject called Proposition 8 ““ Did Mormons Go Too Far? I contacted him and I purchased his footage, I purchased some of his documentation, and after we got into Sundance it was abundantly clear that we needed all hands on deck. So I brought Steven on as a producer and editor of the project and then by virtue of the hours he put into the film in the last few months of production I said I would give him co-director credit. So that was all I could do and that’s how it all evolved. It’s how all those relationships evolved and those relationships are indicative of many that came together to make this film. So many people all over the country.

    prop-8-la-mormon-demo-cCS: And I think that one of the overriding things, at least I was thinking looking at my notes, was why did the church see something in California as an issue that they really wanted to try to get behind?

    COWAN: Of course we know that as California goes, so goes the rest of the nation. And I think Mormons thought, “Oh God. Oh Heavenly Father. If gay marriage happens in California, it’s going to happen all over.” The Mormons in their call, as you saw in the movie said indeed we are compelled by our faith to speak out and I think that really is at the root of it all.

    The Mormons think that the only way to achieve the highest level in heaven is to be baptized a Mormon, to be married man to woman in the Mormon temple, to progress to godhood on your own planet where men can marry multiple wives and make many multitudes of babies and inhabit their own planet and repeat the cycle. Mormons teach that man is what God once was and God is what man may become. And so the doctrine is “Look, man to woman, man to multiple woman, babies and gay people don’t fit into that picture.” I truly think that Mormons, I don’t think, I know from my own training that Mormons see gay people as an interruption in the grand scheme of heaven. And that has to be corrected or extinguished.

    CS: And you’re no longer a Mormon, correct?

    COWAN: I left the Mormon Church years ago. Ironically, not over this issue but I left the Mormon Church after my Mormon mission because I served the church in a country where there is a beautiful proud African American population and I could never get a straight answer from any of them as to why the Church I was knocking doors for didn’t allow full participation from African Americans until 1978. And finally if I couldn’t get an adequate explanation, I can’t put my name on it and I won’t.

    CS: There was a mother couldn’t witness her own child being married in a temple here across town because she, herself, was not Mormon. The boy went to the process of being one but she had to actually wait for them to leave the temple and celebrate outside. It seems like such a harsh thing to have happened. Is this just a religion that is like like any other religions or is there something more deeply seeded that it makes you want to come back and say, “What is really going on in that church?”

    COWAN: As to that Mormons believe that the ceremony that literally binds and seals a husband to a wife for time and eternity is one of the most sacred ceremonies that is performed in their tradition. And only those who are Mormon who pay 10% of their income to the Mormon Church, who keep the moral code, who keep the physical code or not drinking, smoking, drugs, coffee, tea, only those who keep the highest strictest moral codes, financial codes, can go into the temple to witness that.

    My own grandmother who passed away a year and a half ago was an angel. Truly, one of the finest people I have ever known in my life and was not a Mormon and had to sit out at my sisters wedding. And what I found ironic was that was the last time I went into a temple because I had to leave my Grandma parked on the curb to go watch my sister get married. And all the while my aunts and uncles could go up and I looked around the room and saw in their marriages that perhaps there were some dishonest business practices going on in their lives but they were allowed to go in and witness this marriage. And my own Grandma who lived a simple, beautiful, pure life was not. And that is a sting for most people but people have to understand from the outside that Mormons believe they are the one and only true religion on the face of the earth that you cannot go to the highest level of heaven unless you are baptized Mormon and marry in the Mormon Temple.

    And, there are strict hurdles to go over in order to achieve all those benchmarks in Mormon life and their objective is to convert everyone whether they are alive or dead. You don’t get into a temple easily and that’s just how it is.

    2010-01-13-prop81CS: In the movie as well, at what point, again it started out as a project on the homeless gay teen population in Utah, at one point did you see that activism involves more than just holding a sign or saying something out loud, that it actually involves getting involved and doing things?

    COWAN: Well, as a former Mormon who went through those very sacred, secret temple ceremonies, I know what the secret handshakes are and I know what the language is and in the Temple you make promises, the Mormons call them covenants to God, upon which you entire, eternal salvation and the salvation of your children is based. And they use covenant language. And in the film we show, which is the answer to your question, I know that it was big. It was bigger than just a call to arms and it was a holy war and that when Mormons use that sacred language of the Mormon Temple. Means and time.

    In the Mormon Temple you covenant to dedicate your means and time to the church. So when Mormons heard the call from their leadership in Salt Lake ““ use those trigger words, it turned simple activism or advocacy into a holy war against gay people. Because everything is out the window at that point their own adherence to their own covenant, to their own promise is in that temple were on the line. And I would imagine many Mormons went home and thought in the privacy of their bedrooms said to their wives and husbands, “My gosh, they used the words means and time and we made these covenants and not only should get involved, but we must if we value the salvation of our entire family.”

    Serious, serious stuff to Mormons.

    CS: And at what point do you see an end game from the stance that 50 years ago we’d be talking about the white and black population ““ the issues of racism now that we look back on it now and say, “Oh my God, there was a drinking fountain that said for Whites Only, for Blacks Only…” Do you have it in your head about what has to happen before we look at this and go, “What were we wasting our lives doing?”

    mormonCOWAN: I believe in a population that can get “when we know better, we can do better.” I always talk about he civil rights struggle and how at one point people had televisions and on the television they saw the police use night sticks on African American brothers and sisters and they saw the fire cannons and saw the fire hoses turned on these people and saw how inhumane that was. And they saw the beam that bigotry leveled on people and their families and I really think that’s why our film is important.

    I do believe the arc of history bends towards justice and I do believe that people will see what happened and they will choose better. I really believe that. And I was on the radio recently with a man from California, a very successful man from California who happens to be an active Mormon and he said no longer are Mormons appealing to educated people, we’re appealing to uneducated people land people and people of different segments of the population, we’re not appealing to the young people anymore. To me, eventually the Mormons are going to have to see that if they are going to survive by way of numbers, they are going to have to be a more inclusive organization and they are going to have to teach their people to be more inclusive with gay people.

    CS: Well, Reed, I know our time is short and I have just one more question to ask you and that is that now that this is done and you’ve seen the response its gotten, where are you emotionally, mentally, about moving forward in your own personal space? Are you hopeful for what’s around the corner? I realize this is a big blow to everyone when this was defeated but how are you going forward now that you made this film?

    COWAN: I adopted two little boys a year ago on Thursday and my personal space is defined by them and I am as motivated and as hopeful as you can ever be when you look into the eyes of two little twin boys who deserve to be raised in a relationship where their parents enjoy the full benefits and protections, rights, privileges, blessings, of full marriage equality. I am very hopeful and I am very determined and very passionate that before I draw my last breath my children will be able to say that the family they were raised in was seen as important and as crucial to society as their peers and that’s where my hope lies.

  • Trailer Park: A-TEAM Review

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    Check out my new column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

    A-Team – Review

    a_team_posterThe tagline to the 2010 version of the A-Team is that There Is No Plan B. Unfortunately, there seems to have been no Plan A, either.

    Watching director/writer Joe Carnahan’s latest action opus you half wonder if he really thought that having characters with absolutely no backstory, no lives to speak of prior to what we see when we hit the ground literally running on the opening fifteen minutes of the film was an especially good idea. Certainly having a Quinton “˜Rampage’ Jackson fill in the shoes left by the charismatic Mr. T in the 80’s might have seemed good in theory but, in execution, it was a miserable decision. Jackson tosses out T’s wildly popular refrain “Fool” as if he were a drunken slob performing it in front of the venerable TV action star in jest. Jackson seems to be well enough equipped to perform as his own if he weren’t trying to inhabit the body of a character decades old but it does feel old. This movie feels old.

    What Carnahan’s camera work, accurately depicting what it would look like if you were to strap a movie camera on a paint shaker and left to run, disappointingly fails to accomplish is a sense of visceral action, of fun. In Smokin’ Aces, Carnahan’s last directorial outing, the camera was in love with what it was capturing; be it Jeremy Piven’s descent into madness, the Tremor brother’s equally impassioned decent into madness, or the action that punctuating the moments where mayhem was the name of the game, that film should have set Carnahan up here to make something with an even bigger budget to blow things up. What we get, however, is humor that doesn’t cut as deep as Aces and action set pieces that simply feel perfunctory than they do a visceral part of what we all want. What we all want the whole time, mind you, is one that captures Carnahan’s talents but when the movie takes no time to give these four men, Hannibal (Liam Neeson), Face (Bradley Cooper), B.A. Baracus, and Murdock (Sharlto Copley) any sense of camaraderie or kinship these men are all expendable.

    The story itself is painfully simplistic: while performing the kinds of things that the A-Team is known for doing in Iraq, while we don’t know what these things are we do see some of our members strategically battle scarred (Cooper, who has a lot of screen time without his shirt on) for proper effect, they’re offered a job. The job has them retrieving American currency printing plates from the dirty clutches of Iraqis who are up to no good. With shocking ease and movie magic that elevates what these men pull off to heights that even the most forgiving person with a good suspension of disbelief would think is insane, the men do the impossible, literally, and are framed once the job goes south. The men, wanting to clear their good name, are freed by a little nudging of CIA agent Lynch (Patrick Wilson, who plays his part with as much listless gusto as Edward Norton did in the Italian Job) go on the hunt for the plates in a story that presents no speed bumps or obstacles too realistic that these men can’t overcome.

    The fault, primarily, lies at the feet of Carnahan, Brian Bloom, and Skip Woods. The former, Carnahan, has no excuse. Both Narc and Smokin’ Aces still hold up as examples for how great and pulpy screenwriting can be and the writing here just reeks of someone who has no interest in logic or depth. Bloom, on the other hand, has an excuse. This is his foray into credited screenwriting after over a 25 year career in Hollywood and if his character in the film (Pike) was any indication of the kind of material he’s capable of producing it’s a sad indication of how one-dimensional he decided to present. However, writer Skip Woods has written such action films as Hitman and X-Men Origins: Wolverine. These two films take the wonder out of trying to decipher why there is no blood coursing through the people we see on the screen, why they feel as alive as a piece of scenery, pawns to be simply moved at the whims of a script that deems it so without any fundamental reasoning.

    The wafer thin love subplot between Cooper and Jessica Biel (Charisa Sosa) is a particularly curious addition to the film in that it too feels like it was put there simply to keep it being a premature sequel to The Expendables. A woman and man do not a romance make and the nonexistence of chemistry or, again, deeper history between these two fails to help make this a compelling relationship to care about in any meaningful way. The direction that Gerald McRaney’s (General Morrison) character goes not only feels like lazy scriptwriting but it’s a shameful callback to old Scooby-Doo episodes where the big reveal depends on a literal unmasking. All that was missing in this movie was for these men to all wake up and realize they were just fantasizing the idea that they were all a super team impervious to logic or reality.

    This was a movie that is supposed to be fun to watch because we want to see these men overcome the danger of being the hunted while also being on the hunt. The failure to capture the sense these men were in any real danger of either being taken back into custody or being killed on assignment almost makes you wonder whether if this ought to have been shown on NBC as a movie of the week if this was how toothless the movie was going to play out on the screen.

    When one of the best compliments you get from a critic who actually gave a positive review of your film remarks about the good-lookingness of your lead actor as a reason why people will like your movie, there’s something wrong with it. We ought to embrace the mayhem and excitement of men like this on the loose, fighting two sides of the law, and we ought to have been given a movie that took an OK television show to explosive heights. Instead, we have a pack of actors just wandering in a movie where you simply don’t care what happens to them. We just want them off our screen so we can go home.

  • Trailer Park: ONDINE, THE WOLFMAN, PRINCE OF PERSIA, & More

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    Check out my new column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

    Ondine – Review

    ondine_poster_1-535x792

    The story seems silly enough if read on paper: Local fisherman (Colin Farrell), out fishing looking for seafood to sell at the local market, finds a woman in his net (Alicja Bachleda) who doesn’t remember who she is or how she ended up caught in a man’s fishing line. He allows the woman to live in a small house located in a sleepy wharf where she can get her bearings all the while telling his young daughter who suffers from kidney failure a story that involves an Irish version of mermaids, silkies, thus bringing us to the beginning of the story. The brevity with which writer and director Neil Jordan sets up almost all of the plot points is almost fantastical in its execution. Without realizing it as someone watching the film Jordan lays out all the pertinent stories that need telling at breakneck speed.

    Not only do we learn that Farrell, whose real name in the film is Syracuse but who town folk still call Circus for his legendary alcoholic antics before he gave up the sauce, is divorced from his wife, trying to put his wild days behind him, and is sharing custody of his daughter but we also learn of his troubled past as it relates to his present in a manner that seems better suited to the stage than it does the screen.

    And this isn’t a knock on Jordan, mind you. I think this performance from Farrell is just as compelling as seeing him in In Bruges. The man simply melts into this man who is not a Hollywood version of a fisherman who’s lived, and still is living, a hardscrabble life he is that fisherman who only has his work and his daughter. There isn’t anything to grab onto beyond this and it’s refreshing insofar that Farrell has to lean on his ability to inhabit someone who feels more real than he does a caricature.

    What Jordan does best in this movie is to put Farrell in a position to navigate the world of a man who has scooped up a gorgeous woman, and make no mistake Bachleda is a quintessential mermaid, a true flower of the ocean with her pale skin and radiant features, and understands his position as a man who could help someone not be found. Farrell buys into the mythos of the mermaid, however, when he thinks that this woman has helped changed his fortunes at sea with the amount of fish and lobster he catches with her aboard his ship but the movie is so much more than a man who thinks he’s on to something with this woman.

    This is a movie about intimacy. Jordan captures an Ireland that is removed from the usual features of the Emerald Isle which are usually accentuated in a film that could have been set anywhere there was a boat and some fishing to be had. This film lives and breathes. From the small details like keeping in moments of people walking down a dirt path and the flourishes that show him to be an expert at capturing a moment, for example, when Farrell and his daughter Annie (Alison Barry) are talking during one of her dialysis treatments, the closeness of the camera and lighting creating a tender moment between a father and daughter that doesn’t feel manipulative, it feels heartfelt and sweet.

    At the heart of it, of course, the mermaid has a secret and it might be one of the more typical elements of a movie that defies most every other convention when it comes to movies about two people falling in love. The brilliance of the film is that from the music to the cinematography by Christopher Doyle which just fits in with Jordan’s aesthetic here the movie has a quiet passion about it; the notes that play underneath the conversations, the shared moments between the players, this is a movie that is dependant on its acting and its pacing.

    Without the ruggedness and everyman charm of Farrell, the mystery which surrounds Bachleda and how she navigates a character that has something to hide but covers it up with a thin veil of sweetness, and the precociousness of Annie who seems more like a real child her age rather than one cut from a script the movie would not be what it is. The idea of mythology and how Farrell believes this strange woman is indeed from the sea is interwoven into the film with a muted amusement while never being distracting to the actual plot of the picture.

    True, Jordan’s script wavers slightly in its final act, the penultimate moment all but telegraphed leading up to the final moment when it all goes exactly to plan, but that shouldn’t take away from a movie that brims with character and is a romantic drama that just radiates talent and sweetness. There’s something to be said about living life in a small town, everyone knowing everyone else’s business, but that’s never been captured so personally and as precisely as Neil Jordan has done here.

    The Wolfman – DVD Giveaway

    the-wolfman-dvdI know some people ragged on this film for its silliness but I loved this picture in a real affectionate B-movie way.

    The action was solid, the gore was viscous, the set design was spectacular and the acting was sub-par. All elements needed for a good horror film. I realize that’s not really what they were hoping to achieve on this picture but seeing how plagued the production was with shifting talent behind the camera I am amazed that this wasn’t a bigger disaster than it was because it’s still a really good film.

    I am hoping this movie finds a new life on DVD and to that end I am offering copies of this movie to anyone who wants to get entered in a contest to get one. I have a few copies so your chances are fairly solid if you send me a note to Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com and simply state your all-time favorite, classic Universal movie monster.

    It’s just that easy, folks.

    A film description:

    Inspired by the classic Universal film that launched a legacy of horror, The Wolfman brings the myth of a cursed man back to its iconic origins. Oscar® winner Benicio Del Toro stars as Lawrence Talbot, a haunted nobleman lured back to his family estate after his brother vanishes. Reunited with his estranged father (Oscar® winner Anthony Hopkins), Talbot sets out to find his brother…and discovers a horrifying destiny for himself. Lawrence Talbot’s childhood ended the night his mother died.

    After he left the sleepy Victorian hamlet of Blackmoor, he spent decades recovering and trying to forget. But when his brother’s fiancée, Gwen Conliffe (Emily Blunt), tracks him down to help find her missing love, Talbot returns home to join the search. He learns that something with brute strength and insatiable bloodlust has been killing the villagers, and that a suspicious Scotland Yard inspector named Aberline (Hugo Weaving) has come to investigate.

    As he pieces together the gory puzzle, he hears of an ancient curse that turns the afflicted into werewolves when the moon is full. Now, if he has any chance at ending the slaughter and protecting the woman he has grown to love, Talbot must destroy the vicious creature in the woods surrounding Blackmoor. But as he hunts for the nightmarish beast, a simple man with a tortured past will uncover a primal side to himself…one he never imagined existed.

    A Dead End, a Resurrection and a Disturbed After.Life by Ray Schillaci

    Pardon my tardiness for posting this article. I have discovered that hell is moving and movers are its minions. I’m finally able to get my work space in semi-order and hammer out my thoughts (or what’s left of them) on some other highlights of the Phoenix Film Festival. The last time I checked, only 1 out of the 3 following films had distribution deals. Each filmmaker has infused their film with their own unique vision and artistic passion which sets it far apart from the standard studio drech and they deserve an audience (film festival, small art house run and/or cable deal).

    nonames-an_unfinished“NoNames” was the big winner and obviously struck a chord with anyone from the mid-west. This is the simple story of people growing up in small town Wisconsin with very few choices and those who pick the wrong ones. The ones that tread the wrong path have little joy to look forward to but the local bar and partying in the back of their cramped trailers. For them, success would be staying out of trouble, getting their own home (that was not a trailer), maintaining a decent job, finding love and keeping it to the best of their ability. These are obviously not priorities in the lead character’s life, Kevin, played by James Badge Dale and that’s the frustrating part of watching his life spiral out of control.

    At this viewer’s first glance it was easy to dismiss many of the characters in this cautionary tale as Jerry Springer candidates and hard to connect with when the choices seemed so simple. I’ve known people like this and try not to be around them since their narrow mindedness and stubborn ways always end up creating more drama in their lives which seems to suck so many unsuspecting others in. But rather than just dismissing this as a backwoods Shakespearean drama, I had to take myself out of the critic’s seat for a moment after seeing the reaction of the audience that stayed for the Q&A. Those people were actually from small towns and their heartfelt feelings were vindicated by the director, cast and crew capturing exactly what goes on in this lifestyle that Hollywood has no clue of or interest in.

    All the more heart wrenching was the discovery that it’s based on a true story. The director and co-producers were very close to the people and their account. That may explain the straightforward style of the picture. The director, Kathy Lindboe, does not accentuate the palette of the narrative with canvases, editing techniques or music. Instead she relies on her actors, the lives of their characters and the town itself. This is captured in a very blunt way that some will embrace while others may feel put off. Lindboe and her talented cast and crew have put together a hard look at small town living and dismantled any romantic conceptions that usually has Hollywood scoop up and serve the inane pabulum to an unsuspecting public. No, director Kathy Lindboe has a purpose and intends to display it without heartstrings and pretty pictures.

    This film is made for small town Middle America and those who have been fortunate enough to escape it. Let me back step for a moment that is not to say that being a small town is instant doom for those who reside in it. The choices have become extremely minimal thanks to America and its politics joining in on the good ol’ global bandwagon. Small towns use to be considered the heart and soul of America and now have been under sold as a worthless commodity. This leaves many in disarray constantly searching for some kind of balance in a purposely unbalanced world. Dysfunction has become the norm and we’re told to live with it rather than address it. “NoNames” displays these symptoms with pathos and guilt, capturing a very sad side of the nation we live in.

    The film is by no means perfect with some editing issues (a little long) and some much needed dialogue to be punched up. But the film struck a primal chord with the Phoenix audiences and has continued to do so with various other showings, hence the accolades. Both James Badge Dale and Gillian Jacobs turn in notable deep felt performances while the rest of the cast blend well with the tale itself. “NoNames” is not the kind of film that opens in L.A. or New York. And, it may find a struggle pulling itself out of obscurity like the characters that are portrayed, but it already has a built-in audience that could definitely give a smart distributor a reason to pick it up and make a profit on an entire heartland audience that can speak volumes.

    gaia-posterNow for something really different; when was the last time you were truly taken on a journey that left you breathless? In the 70s there were a multitude of such films that explored the human condition and left one with so many deep conversations at small coffee shops; Michelangelo Antonioni’s “The Passenger” Nicholas Roeg’s “Walkabout” and any one of John Cassavetes’ films of that era. The Phoenix Film Festival was treated to such a personal event with Jason Lehel’s “Gaia,” an amazing journey of self realization for one troubled young woman. It appears that Lehel may be cut from the same creative cloth as those mentioned.

    The director has made (what some may say) an insane proposition; to film an emotionally charged concept infused with brilliant ideas without the aid of a script and then cast an unknown in the lead role with everything hinging on her believability. On top of that, he puts her right smack dab in the middle of a real Indian reservation with non-actors. It pays off in spades! This is the art that has been missing from art houses. Lehel conjures images that haunt and have one talking for days while Emily Lape pulls off a performance that is not only Oscar worthy, but should have other actresses taking notes for years. It is a beautifully nuanced and natural piece of acting that almost feels like an intrusion into one’s life thanks to Lehel’s wonderful eye.

    To say Gaia is a troubled woman with a dark past is an understatement. This young woman appears hell-bent in partying herself to death till she winds up wandering the Arizona desert in a complete drug and alcohol haze after being brutally raped. She eventually collapses and is taken in by a caring Native American Indian, named Ed. What transpires between Gaia, Ed and the other natives is a revelation. Nothing is taken for granted and Gaia’s journey is not a quick fix. It is an arduous task that is never clear if it will ever come into fruition until the very end. This is not a horrifying cautionary tale, but an ode to hope, survival and self-realization. It is both the frailness of being human and the triumph of the human spirit. The story almost takes on a cosmic sojourn with the time spent with the Native Americans and their culture.

    Aside from Miss Lape’s stellar turn, Ed Mendoza as the Native American who helps her along is wonderfully touching with a lightheartedness that lifts Gaia and the viewers from the ashes of her life. He is the grounding rod to Gaia’s lightening and his sensitivity and interaction with so many others makes him even more embracing. There is also a strained, touching and nearly doomed relationship between Gaia and a deaf mute Native American. Their scenes range from the gentle to the abrasive with Gaia’s past haunting both of them.

    Warning: this film is not for the simple minded. It makes you think about life and what it has to offer. Director Jason Lehel (a 25+ year veteran cinematographer) has created, for his directorial debut, a complex drama that does not follow the normal narrative. He explores time shifts, uncomfortable sexual dalliances and an exploration into a culture virtually ignored in film today. I recommend this beautiful thought provoking film to those who miss intelligent drama laced with a hint of the metaphysical. It is a rare breed and a breath of fresh air that makes one thankful for the talents of Jason Lehel and Emily Lape.

    after_life-posterI have saved a most puzzling for last. There are times that life imitates art and other times when there is a bizarre collision that results in uncomfortable, nails on the chalk board, moments. Case in point; actress, Brittany Murphy’s recent passing in her bathroom colliding with the debut of her new movie on DVD, the cover displaying the actress dead in a bathtub”¦eerie. Now treading from eerie to damn creepy is Liam Neeson’s turn as a funeral director who claims to have a relationship with his (dead) clientele. For some, “After.Life” will be the equivalent of afterbirth; disgusting and tossed aside. But it’s not that easy for the curious at heart and as aggravating and unsettling it is to watch the film can be considered either a carefully crafted twisted piece of Grand Guignol or the demented work of a sick mind. I may save the last for another gruesome film oddity, “The Human Centipede”. After all, “After.Life” plays more with your mind than serving up stomach churning visuals.

    I’m on the fence with this one since I could not help but wonder what possessed the great and respected Liam Neeson to take on such a ghoulish role and then to top it off have the love of his life pass away in an unusual accident just months after finishing the project. It adds tremendous weight to the story as we watch it unfold between Neeson’s funeral director and his new visitor Christina Ricci, who may or may not be dead. It appears that the funeral director has a gift/curse to have conversations with those on the slab who insist they are still alive and it is his job to assist them into the beyond. On the other hand, this guy may be the greatest slight-of-hand trickster since Norman Bates.

    This is as cold and calculating as it sounds. Mr. Neeson gives a performance that harkens back to the good old days of the great Boris Karloff, but it is not over the top. If anything, he underplays beautifully which adds to the gruesomeness of it all. With several naked shots, Ricci is very off-putting to watch. A combination of material, performance and direction make the scenes feel very wrong, almost taboo. There is nothing sexy here, like what was delivered in “Black Snake Moan”. Ricci runs the gamut of emotions trying to figure out if she is actually dead and so do we.

    Although there are others in the cast, “After.Life” is basically a two person melodrama/thriller and at times may remind one of a play. Justin Long as Paul appears to be in for the ride, once again as a long suffering boyfriend. I don’t know if it’s a casting curse, but Long’s character looks like it just traversed across the screen from the same thankless character he played in “Drag Me to Hell”. He has the ability to be engaging, but it’s wasted in movies of this sort. I wouldn’t be surprised if he was casted in “Scream 4” as another victim.

    “After.Life” has played some festivals, had a limited run in April 2010 and is readying for an August 2010 DVD release. But this film cries out for the midnight show freaks. The director’s ghoulish twists and turns keep the audience on its toes and hammered to their seats while the weak may watch through parted fingers. Agitating, aggravating and like searching for a pulse that may or may not be there, “After.Life” challenges its viewers. Are you up for the challenge? Me, I had to take a good shower afterwards, remind myself it was only celluloid and look forward to a lighter side of a tanned Mr. Neeson as Colonel John “Hannibal” Smith on “The A Team”.

    Prince of Pulp and Circumstance by Ray Schillaci

    prince_of_persia_poster1How easy is it to take apart another Jerry Bruckheimer spectacle that hopes to follow in the footsteps of Cecile B. Demille or is that too lofty a goal to suggest? Perhaps it’s the idea of taking another ride, toy or video game and making oodles of money on merchandising via a movie while nearly forgetting the entertainment value. Whatever it may be, “Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time” is as convoluted as its title. Too bad, it didn’t have to be, had somebody taken a little more time with the story and direction. The movie had any number of classic yarns it could have emulated from, Ali Baba, Aladdin and so forth. Instead, gymnastics and CGI cover up plot holes, dead space and time filler.

    The story is simple; a street urchin demonstrates his tenacity in a marketplace and the king of Persia not only spares his life for the spirit the young man displays, but adopts him as well. The young man grows up with royalty and like nearly everyone else learns to speak with a British accent even though they’re Persian. The only exception is Ben Kingsley, but that’s because he looks more the part, is suspicious and is far capable of acting rings around everyone else. That’s just one of the many things that irks me in this wrong minded new venture from the man that brought you “Pirates of the Caribbean”. Just to prove that, Alfred Molina is thrown in for good measure to represent the Captain Jack Sparrow character in the guise of Sheik Amar. Molina is the lighthearted rogue that is more bark than bite with a sense of humor that gets crushed in all the slam-bang antics. To be fair to Mr. Molina, he is a redeeming value in this mess and should have been spared and put to better use in the new “Pirates”¦” movie instead.

    Oops, I almost forgot to finish what story there is. Jake Gyllenhall plays Dastan the adopted brother who is raised with two other good looking brothers. Without the king’s knowledge, the three march on a sacred city as a suspected enemy of their land. In doing so, Dastan accidently discovers a mystical dagger that can reverse time. The adventure starts from there and if anybody ever had a chance to see the sorrowful time waster “Next” starring Nicholas Cage, one could only guess where it will all end up. It’s the equivalent of a lot of build up and then discovering”¦it’s only a dream? That’s right, dress a pig up all you want, but in the end it’s just an overdressed heffer.

    Jake Gyllenhall plays cavalier well, unfortunately it’s to Gemma Arterton’s emotionless, cardboard cutout character that makes us appreciate Keira Knightly’s underwritten character from “Pirates”¦” all the more. The CGI cities are becoming stale wastelands for the eye and are better suited for the small computer screen where they belong. The acrobatics, supposedly achieved by Gyllenhal’s character, soon become redundant after twenty minutes leaving a lot of useless commotion as time filler.

    Is it unfair to ask for just a little bit of creative writing or wit from this lackluster piece? The trailers themselves could not muster up enough of a great weekend box office for this tired retread. Mind you, it’s not a bad time waster for the under 15 year-old male set. The sad part was half way through, my 10 year-old son and his year younger cousin were getting antsy. They didn’t even want to stay past the credits to see if anything would happen as some of the Disney films have. They could care less. But they did want to get the Prince of Persia lego set. They thought it was cooler than the movie.

  • Trailer Park: SEX AND THE CITY 2 and LOST

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    Check out my new column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

    Get Him To The Greek – Movie Pass Giveaway

    get-him-to-the-greek-posterI am hoping this is the movie I need.

    It’s almost June and I have yet to see a film that just wants to be funny. We’ve had countless blockbusters, animated films, chick flicks, but where has the comedy been? If MacGruber is any indication I know that a lot of people have stayed away from movies that only purport to be a fun romp. Here’s to wishing that the latest from Nicholas Stoller delivers on the idea that this will be the vehicle that properly channels Russell Brand’s unique comedic aesthetic.

    For those living in Arizona I have a stack of passes to see Greek on Tuesday, June 1st at 7:00 p.m. at the Tempe Marketplace. If you want some just e-mail me at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com and I’ll make it happen for those who act swiftly.

    About the movie:

    Aaron Greenberg (Hill) gets things done. The ambitious 23-year-old has exaggerated his way into a dream job just in time for a career-making assignment. His mission: Fly to London and escort a rock god to L.A.’s Greek Theatre for the first-stop on a $100-million tour. His warning: Turn your back on him at your own peril.

    British rocker Aldous Snow (Brand) is both a brilliant musician and walking sex. Weary of yes men and piles of money, the former front man is searching for the meaning of life. But that doesn’t mean he can’t have a few orgies while he finds it. When he learns his true love is in California, Aldous makes it his quest to win her back”¦right before kick-starting his world domination.

    As the countdown to the concert begins, one intern must navigate a minefield of London drug smuggles, New York City brawls and Vegas lap dances to deliver his charge safe and, sort of, sound. He may have to coax, lie to, enable and party with Aldous, but Aaron will get him to the Greek.

    Sex and the City 2 – Review

    sex_and_the_city_2_posterThere is nothing at stake for any of these characters.

    It’s the moment when Miranda Hobbes (Cynthia Nixon) and Charlotte York (Kristin Davis) confide in one another about the trials of being a mother in Sex and the City 2 when it’s obvious this movie has absolutely no interest in being relevant. Once, this was a show that gave a voice to modern women who felt that they needed to have a program that showcased what it was really like to be a lady, post-feminism, in a world that still wanted to keep their musings to themselves.

    Sex and the City, the television show, broke boundaries when it challenged the dominant male stranglehold on crass and crude depictions of sexuality. It was men who slept around, it’s was men who were always fumfering trying to find love, it was men who felt inadequate. The show was a fun examination that seemed to harness the many facets of the female psyche: the need to be glamorous, the pressure to succeed professionally, the ambitions to be socially accepted at any cost, the desire to be in control, sexually, regardless of age.

    This film is amazing in that it completely fails to honor the values that made the series, and the first film for that matter, a wonderful hallmark for women everywhere to embrace as their own. They’d just as soon be better served to revisit their DVDs rather than to sit through this completely useless exercise which could be better classified as a throwaway curtain call that is obnoxiously too long, filled with monotonous and superfluous storylines that seem more interested in resurrecting characters than focusing on the ones in front of us, and is entirely ignorant of the irony that these women have now become an example of what happens when you put last year’s style up against what’s couture today. Anna Wintour, if she was being honest, would say this film has a style more suited to the tastes of those who find the fashion of Old Navy to be cutting edge.

    The girls come together in this second entry for a film that shames Michael Patrick King’s earlier efforts as director/writer for SATC part 1, to say nothing of the work he did on the television show when it was on from 1998-2004. The crux, primarily, of this film is how Carrie (Sarah Jessica Parker) and Big (Chris Noth) are dealing with marriage two years in but the problems they have are so far removed from the Carrie we all knew in the series and the first film that it never occurs to anyone that hers is now a life devoid of restriction. Besides a genuinely painful, and horribly written, exchange early on in the film when a couple at a wedding talk to Carrie and Big about having children, the idea of what’s considered normal small talk is obviously lost on King, and the forced realization that these two older individuals have chosen a life without kids ought to be one of personal contentment. They should be satisfied in their decisions but King
    makes it awkward for all of us when he has the couple who realize Carrie and Big don’t see parenthood as a part of their master plan recoil from admiration to abject shame. Whether King is obsessed with more important things like getting tight shots of men’s pouches donning Speedos and slo-mos of them disrobing throughout the film I couldn’t tell you but what I do know is that this story plays out like a ham fisted attempt to cash in on a franchise that no one with a big enough checkbook wants to see go away.

    Rather, what we’re given really is an insult to the fans who have supported the idea that these women who are all demure and exciting in their own way are reduced to shells of their former selves, drifting though life doing nothing more than complaining about their pitiful existence. As it stands, however, these women just come off as haggard old also-rans who live lives of privilege.

    Charlotte rants and bawls at one point about her tough time as a mother, never acknowledging her privileged life with a live-in nanny who whisks her kids away at the first sign of trouble. She comes off as a selfish witch who would be better served to have her money taken away for a while before being allowed to complain about her circumstances.

    Samantha Jones, played by the always interesting Kim Cattrall, visits Abu Dhabi with her three girlfriends as the guest of a wealthy man but ends up trying to let her freak flag fly as high as it can go, completely disregarding custom and socially appropriate etiquette on multiple levels. Instead of harnessing that energy and making something interesting, King treats it as a chance to toss in one of the more obnoxiously half-baked storylines ever to be concocted. Hers is a character that ends up looking more pathetic and embarrassing than she does as the representative of labial empowerment. It’s also insulting to the women of that emirate who see the invading hoards of high fashion to be seen as women who are in the need of rescuing. Oddly, we’re clued in that some progressive women are challenging the norms but, later in the film, we’re forced into a moment that makes us feel like this isn’t good enough, that male domination cannot be allowed
    to stand one minute longer. It wants it both ways in this film and it ends up making this mess even murkier to wade through.

    Carrie, as well, doesn’t fare well here either. Watching the working girl struggle to find ways in order to feed her need for fashion accoutrements in the series, the plateau of which was seen in the first film when she married a man who was now in the position to let her get her fix until the day she died, was one of the reasons people tuned in. Hyper analyzing her marriage two years in not only reeks of a writer desperate to find a chink in a gorgeous piece of armor but it doesn’t make for a very good story. When the worst thing that besets this celluloid power couple, and the whole movie for that matter, is an unintended kiss, only for it to be remedied with a black diamond offered up by the offended party, it smacks of stupidity and laziness.

    Alas, it is Miranda who ends up coming off as the most interesting of the four but even there is an issue with her arc as a character. Her quitting of a job that was built up as a device that could have lasted the entire film within the first ¼ of the film, only to be brought up at the very end of the picture, represented the totality of her growth. Used as merely window dressing to move the plodding, lumbering plot forward, there could not have been a worse way to treat someone who always represented something special in this band of sisters.

    Ultimately, no one was safe from their mishandling at the hands of King. Unable to comprehend that this comedy of multiple errors should have ended or have been edited down a half hour or even 45 minutes to make this a true 90 minute comedy King had his own plan and, unfortunately, the movie feels like a monetary cash-in, a fiscal decision, that truly wants to give the audience what they want. The problem is, a trip to Abu Dhabi, a stolen kiss from Aiden, a two year itch, problems with a nanny, these all are irrelevant to the genuinely amusing lives these women once had.

    They say that money doesn’t change you, that it only enhances the person you are. If that’s the case, and judging by what was on the screen, I don’t think I knew these women at all and I don’t think I want to anymore.

    Josh Holloway – Interview

    For many years I have held this interview as one of the best experiences I’ve had with an actor. Way back in 2005, months after the first season came to an end and lit a fire in the hearts of many who saw this as groundbreaking television I had the chance to talk to Josh an immediately jumped at the chance to talk to the guy, never minding that I was green as could be when it came to interviewing.

    Lost was a program I sometimes wavered from in the middle years, the story just growing and bloating to epic proportions, but it got me back in the last couple of years. The ending, for me, was a semi-satisfying one and a wholly satisfying one with regard to giving Jack some closure. I wanted to do something novel and I thought back to when I talked to Josh after the first season was over, when Lost fever was high, and when he was feeling the love from fans at San Diego Comic-Con, the nexus point, really, where the love flowed all too freely.

    I’ll miss Lost so here’s one for the road…An interview that I still remember clearly almost 5 years later.

    Josh Holloway likes to smile.

    It would be completely clichéd and People Magazine of me to state that, of course, he has a lot to smile about but that’s not what struck me when I made this observation about him. What made the time I spent with Josh so memorable was the absolute sense of openness that he engendered in the twenty five minutes I spent with him discussing his own trajectory as an actor as a lead in his very first major motion picture.

    With every interview I’ve done there is always a little something I’ve built up about a celebrity, for a lack of a better word. It’s either I’ve seen their work and I secretly hope the interview is a little bit of them appeasing me with the questions I ask and a little bit of that charisma that so many of the “stars” people see on stage or screen seem to exude. I think there’s a lot of fan boy in me that I have to keep in check like it’s a caged animal that needs to be restrained but there’s also the inquisitive other half of me that wants to throw out the kinds of inquires some celebs have never been asked.

    My goal, my only goal, with Josh was to not ask a damn thing about Lost, Season 2. I didn’t want to know anything about the show that he wasn’t going to volunteer. I didn’t care to ask anything about the meanings of his back story and what it meant to all that’s happened to him on the show, I didn’t give a rat’s ass about where he thinks his relationship with Kate’s going and I really didn’t want to know whether he and Sayid were going to have it out again this year. After listening to dozens of Entertainment Tonight, Extra and all sorts of other tabloids and radio interviewers speculate and fish for answers whenever they managed to corner one of the stars of Lost, one excruciating interview was one I heard with Naveen Andrews and even though Naveen’s role on the show and real life resume is one of the most interesting all the radio host could ask about was how he ended up with Barbara Hershey and what secrets he could let the world in on, I just realized how sad it was that the actors on this show were part of one of the biggest successes to hit the free air and all anyone could do was talk about the most meaningless thing they could think of.

    So, if you’re looking to know what’s coming in season 2 of Lost, whether or not Sawyer is going to get it on with Freckles, what the hell is up with the polar bear and what seems to be his predilection for the George Michael 2-Day stubble look he’s rocking on his face week after week, you can stop reading right now and skip to next week where other celebs shamelessly gladly pimped their wares with me. This isn’t an act of pomposity on my part, I assure you. I think the dalliances of any Hollywood actor as I hear how their lives are so much better than mine are completely engrossing. I watch Cribs, I read Entertainment Weekly, I steal a peek at the National Enquirer; I’m shallow, I admit that. But what I didn’t want my short amount of time with Josh to be was everything that I eschewed about the press surrounding the show and I wanted to give you, the audience, a good look at the person behind one of the best played bad boys this side of the Pacific.

    I wanted to actually talk to Josh. Have a real conversation with him. Find out more about where he’s come from, where he’s planning on going. I just hoped he wouldn’t have an attitude. It was a short list of hopes and aims, sure, but when I first stepped onto the brightly lit sundeck on a warm July afternoon in San Diego I was greeted with what I can only describe as a force that I can’t begin to genuinely describe because of its oddity. As soon as I was formally introduced Josh seemed genuinely pleased to meet me as I got a look at a smile I would be seeing a lot in the time I would be spending with him. Like a complete gentleman he, himself, introduced me to his wife who also seemed to be happy to meet me, a feat not too many strange women have ever accorded to me in a non-inebriated state. She was lovely. The two of them not only didn’t seem to mind when I asked to take their picture together but they seemed, as they stood next to each other, like a couple who honestly seemed happy to be with one another. If there ever was a Bizzaro world episode on Lost where Sawyer had to meet his doppelganger, I think I know who should play him.

    All superlatives aside, there isn’t much more I can say about the man who has the left the greatest impression on me as an interviewer; even more than getting to talk to Stan Lee, even better than asking Natalie Portman a couple of questions face-to-face, Josh just seemed grateful for everything he’s been given. When you’re talking with him you just want to think that of all those people who you see struggling to make it in Hollywood you’re happy that someone like him is one of those who did. Josh likes to laugh, no question about it. His stories of struggling to give his career one last shot of everything he has are the kinds of things you’d want to listen to while having a beer with the guy at a party. He’s just plain interesting and engrossing as a subject while being one of the nicest strangers you ever could hope to meet.

    Class act doesn’t begin to describe him. It embodies him.

    joshCHRISTOPHER STIPP: So, how was it to walk on that stage and seeing all those people?

    JOSH HOLLOWAY: That was exciting. That’s the reward of doing as well as we have. I’ve never done a convention. No one ever wanted me at one; it’s a little different. I find panels, though, to be a lot of fun.

    I hope that I am answering the questions intelligently enough but I like the comedy of it. I like a panel for the banter with the fans. I love the energy. I’m having a blast.

    CHRISTOPHER STIPP: The Comic-Con crowds with their questions can sometimes be a little different. I am thinking of the person who asked you in the panel discussion about whether you like to swim in the nude.

    (Josh laughs)

    Did they warn you that “You know, there are probably going to be questions”¦”

    HOLLOWAY: No, but I figured, and it’s so funny, because that’s been going around for a while. Just because when we first arrived in Hawaii everyone was like, “Look at our office! This is ridiculous.” Everyone was, and it wasn’t everyone, just the brave ones, it was that Hawaii inspired us and it was just like, “Let’s go swimming naked!” I haven’t skinny dipped in years and it felt good.

    CHRISTOPHER STIPP: In Ohau?

    HOLLOWAY: Yeah, and it’s just amazing. My wife and I just bought a house there and so we’re really loving”¦melting into the Hawaiian culture and hope to be there a few more years.

    I mean, it’s paradise; it’s the best place in the world to be working and just existing. You only work so much and you’ve got to live in the place. It’s better, than say, Siberia. There are much worse places you could be working.

    CHRISTOPHER STIPP: Now, your movie WHISPER. Give me a quick synopsis. It’s your first real lead, right?

    HOLLOWAY: Yes, yes, which is really nerve wracking, actually.

    I’ve just gotten Sawyer, and I am developing that, and to take the step, to take a role and to do a movie is exciting and nerve wracking. The movie, WHISPER, basically is about a group of people who are really down on their luck, not being given a chance anymore, by society because of past records. The old story is that when you’re a convict you can’t get a job, no one will give you a second chance. So, what these people decide to do, essentially, is kidnap this kid for ransom. Aaaand, it goes badly. We get a lot more than we bargained for with this kid.

    But what excited me about this role was that my character doesn’t want to do it. He’s trying to start a new life because he’s fallen in love and he wants to provide for his woman and start a new life, a good life, with this woman. Everything that motivates him is love when what he’s doing is horribly wrong and I liked the dichotomy of that. And the fact that the kid is supposed to be the innocent one and, when it flips, there is a beautiful transition there. That’s what excited me and made me say, “Wow, innocence is evil and evil is innocence.”

    CHRISTOPHER STIPP: I’m curious to know about your first day on the set of WHIPSER. I just think back to every first job I’ve had, regardless of what it was I was doing, and I remember how it emotionally felt to just try and get a footing, a handle on things. How was it for you?

    HOLLOWAY: It was a whirlwind.

    Because of scheduling, of course, they were pushing the movie, pushing the movie, they already started filming the movie, so I wrapped Lost and the very next day I am on set so there was no break in moving from one character to this one.

    And it takes you a minute before you hit your stride. So, that first day is nerve wracking and, also, I am kind of used to having a family in Hawaii. I mean we’ve all become a family over the season. The comfort level of going to work and experiencing that”¦and then the first day of the movie is like you have to introduce yourself to all these new people and then having to feel the pressure of it being on that level, a movie. It’s awesome but you have to be ready and everyone is expecting. And I’m thinking to myself, “Oookay, I’ve got to deliver.” So, it’s the usual pre-game jitters but once the game starts, you’ve got no room for that. It all goes away.

    It’s just what we put ourselves through before the game that’s torture.

    And it was such an honor to work with Michael Rooker as he’s been in so many things: DAYS OF THUNDER, HENRY: PORTRAIT OF A SERIAL KILLER and I have been watching him for years so it’s definitely an honor to have worked with him. And Stewart Hendler, a first time director, that was actually a nice bond because him and I were both awe struck by it all but then the balance to that was Dean Cundey, a masterful filmmaker. He did the original FOG, he did the original HALLOWEEN, THE THING, he was the orgininal DP on all of those. And of course he went on to win the Academy Award for APOLLO 13 but he wanted to come back and get his hands dirty and do a classic thriller/horror kind of movie and that’s what I loved about it and what he loves about it. It’s very simple. Not a lot of tricks. It’s kind of like your old school horror movie which is great.

    CHRISTOPHER STIPP: And those kinds of films are making a resurgence”¦

    HOLLOWAY: Yes, they are.

    I was glad to be making one that wasn’t gimmick, gimmick, gimmick, you know what I mean? This one really works on the original principals of horror movies and the unknown, and all that kind of stuff, a little bit of demonic stuff brought in there, a little DAMIEN kind of thing.

    It’s good, It’s simple and it’s spooky.

    CS: One of things I wanted to do before meeting you was to get an idea, professionally speaking, of the roles you did before landing Sawyer on Lost. One of the first things I saw was that you were billed as “Good Looking Guy” in an episode of Angel.

    (Laughs for good reason)

    josh2HOLLOWAY: That’s right!

    My very first job was Good Looking Guy. That’s what they said as the description, I just thought it was funny. My next job I think I got was Bartender. It took me a while to get a name on my trailer.

    So, you do what you do. I did seven indies. True indies with no money, guerella shooting. I did some television spots for Angel, Walker, Texas Ranger, CSI, a couple more.

    But, those movies, doing those independents on that level, was such a great experience and growing time for me as an actor because the nature of it being a true indie, everyone’s disorganized, you’ve got 18 days to get this thing in the can, and it’s only so much money but you’re busting it, getting it done. But, in that, you’re allowed a great deal of creative freedom. Because people are like runnin’ and gunnin’ as they’re saying, “This isn’t making sense. Can you make it work?” Yeah, I can make that work. You’re able to work with the writers and you create as you go. It also taught me to think on my feet. It’s made me available for any twists that may come and that’s what really made it such a good experience. I also did a diverse type of characters. I did a comedy, two comedies. In one I played this bodybuilder who was this complete innocent guy that was being hit on by a homosexual man the whole time and he was just so happy just to have a friend and there was a lot that went on there. Then, I played the opposite of that where I played the Obi-Wan of sex, if you will. That was a lot of fun. I moved on to a western, a crazy, psycho guy, so I got to do a lot of stretching as an actor which I think has helped me a lot because I love character work.

    I don’t just don’t get up and say, “I’ll just go be me.” I try and put me in every character and just blow that aspect up but I just don’t play an idea.

    CS: I think that comes through because the character of Sawyer, to anyone who comes upon him, they know exactly what he means and where he’s coming from, the intensity of it all. It’s a character that’s been infused with a history.

    HOLLOWAY: Yes!

    And that’s what I love about this craft. For me, a lot of the things that I see in character work is an idea. You can tell when someone is playing an idea or if they’re emboding it and it’s so important to find that aspect within you, that’s truly you, and blow it up. That’s what makes it real.

    (Josh turns his head quickly as his wife tries to sneak through his jeans to steal a cigarette. He starts to ask her what she needs before she puts a finger to her lips and points down to my recorder. Josh laughs anyway as the faux noises of passionate love embed themselves into my digital device; it is funny. She absconds with what she wants from Josh.)

    CS: How long have you been married?

    HOLLOWAY: Since October 1st.

    CS: Congratulations.

    HOLLOWAY: Thank you so much. 1 year. We’ve almost been together 7 now.

    CS: Really?

    HOLLOWAY: Long time.

    She has seen me at my worst.

    CS: I was just going to say that I heard something about real estate.

    HOLLOWAY: Oh yes.

    CS: Were you getting to the point where you were thinking about giving it all up?

    HOLLOWAY: Again. I think that was the 3rd time the town broke me. But in 8 ½ years of busting it and constant rejection and getting close and never quite getting to work, to do the work you’ve been trained to do that’s in you. It just burns you up. And, yeah, right before I booked Lost I had just got my real estate license, I was making my exit again, and I had t have the conversation with my wife who was then my girlfriend, I hadn’t yet proposed, I just didn’t have anything I could bring. I couldn’t support her. It’s part of being a man I guess. My feeling was, “If I can’t provide anything then what am I doing?”

    And that was it. I needed to move on in my life. Just for my soul I had to do something. So I went into real estate. I got my license, I got Lost and promptly filed it away.

    (Laughs the kind of laugh only people who really do know what it’s like to no longer be indentured to a 9 to 5 existence.)

    CS: Did you realize how big this job was going to be when you saw that J.J. Abrams was attached to it?

    HOLLOWAY: Just because I had been beaten as bad as I did for 8 ½ years I knew, statistically, and knowing my past, I knew I was going to have to go the Clooney path which was that I was going to have to do 16 pilots before one goes. So I was just happy to get the first level for what I thought was going to be a really long road. I was praying, of course, that it would work but, statistically, they were telling me it was going to be one of the most expensive shows ever, and that’s when I was like”¦

    CS: Were you thinking, “I can’t believe this is happening?”

    HOLLOWAY: The one thing that goes through your head is, “Oh my God, I better kick it. I better be on the level with this one or they’ll kill me quickly.” And that was a bit intimidating at first, working with actors that I had been watching through the years like Harold, who did ROMEO AND JULIET, Naveen who was in the ENGLISH PATIENT and Dom who was in the LORD OF THE RINGS movies, and Matt Fox who was in his series forever, and I was like, “Oh boy.”

    CS: Was the experience like thinking, “These guys have so much experience”¦”

    josh5HOLLOWAY: Yes and the knowledge that, “You’re damn right I’m ready and I can certainly be on the level.”

    But of course you’re worried about it until you actually get in the game.

    That’s what amazing, too, is that we’ve become such a family of friends and that rarely happens with a cast. Even with a small cast that’s rare but a large cast? For us to get along so well”¦I want, as much as I want to be on the show, I want to be able and continue these relationships with these wonderful people, my new friends. That’s been a huge gift.

    And we get together on Wednesdays, whoever’s flashback episode it is, we go to their house and, whether they like it or not, it’s their responsibility to host the party. So, every Wednesday we get to touch base because a lot of the time we don’t get to film together. We’re all off shooting different parts. So, every Wednesday we pull it back together, we have some laughs and get inspired by each other and inspire each other.

    CS: You never hear these kinds of things.

    HOLLOWAY: No, you don’t.

    CS: To go with the ABC angle, Desperate Housewives have been doing so well but on the US magazines of the world it’s all about who’s fighting with who, who’s asking for more money”¦

    HOLLOWAY: Yeah, which is the norm, from what I’ve been told and that this is extremely rare. And I’m like, “Really? This is awesome.” And what’s difficult is that you get so close and Ian Somerhalder is no longer there and he’s a very good friend and it’s, “Argh!” I was getting into our fishing together.

    CS: And on the subject of finding work, what really got you through the day when you were looking for that one job or that one break which would’ve helped you out? Everyone says it’s believing in yourself, it’s perseverance, but self-help garbage aside, what really carried you through your days?

    HOLLOWAY: I couldn’t stop my dreams.

    I couldn’t stop my daydreams or night dreams or my dreams of what I want out of life. I don’t know, I didn’t know what I wanted out of life. I didn’t know what I wanted to be, I wanted to be everything. Acting would provide that. I could taste what it would be like to be a secret agent, I could taste what it would be like to be a contractor, a lawyer, whatever, this or that. That really”¦I didn’t want to let that go because I wanted to experience what movies and the like would allow you to experience. And it’s still”¦it’s what got me up in the morning. It takes everything you have, emotionally and physically, just to keep going. You’re constantly nervous or excited, really happy or really sad, and it’s just a constant plethora of emotions that you’re faced with in this job.

    I mean, I’m a cancer, I’m emotional and that’s what kept me in: the magic. You hit those moments and you have that magic happen it’s freeing. And when I was about to leave I’d hit the magic again. And it would reel me back in. But I can’t. It’s so all-encompassing for me. And that’s what inspires me in life; I want to inspire and be inspired.

    CS: 23 episodes. That’s tough enough on a writer but what you have to go through to get it all in as an actor?

    It’s difficult to get it all in and filmed in 8 days. They write such amazing little movies each time. To get it all in that amount of time we’re moving at a ballistic pace and thank God we have the kind of actors we do as we’re handed scripts and pretty much told, “Here you go. You have five minutes. Good luck.” And they all do it. And they knock it out of the park. Begrudgingly, because it’s so nerve wracking, but you do it and that’s been amazing. That we’ve been able to keep up the pace but keep the bar up.

    And you know”¦I’m looking forward to doing more scenes with people I didn’t get to do many scenes with during the first season. I didn’t get many scenes with Emily. One scene with Jorge; can’t wait to do more scenes with Jorge. I love the casting because you get to work with so many actors that are awesome and each one is a different flavor and adds a different dimension to your character. How you deal with them and what they bring out of you and what you bring out of them.

  • Trailer Park: PULLING JOHN, YESTERDAY WAS A LIE, THE MESSENGER, GIGGLE GIGGLE, QUACK, RUNAWAY RALPH

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    Check out my new column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

    The Messenger – DVD Review

    the_messenger_posterWoody Harrelson is a human litmus test for what the ravages of war can do to an individual.

    The Messenger is a movie that defies a conventional critique as the movie unspools in a manner that feels more real than it does made up, more visceral than it does imagined.  While Kevin Bacon’s turn in Taking Chance was a heartfelt swan song to one human’s life who died for his country, The Messenger is grittier in its portrayal of a man tasked with delivering the news no family member wants to get about their fallen soldier.

    It’s grittier and more immediate thanks to the liberating decisions made by first time director Oren Moverman. The camera seems to always be bobbing, moving, trying to angle for a better position with which to see men like Woody Harrelson and Ben Foster, who finally gets a role that feels like it was written to play to his talents, navigate a world where there is no more war to fight. It’s the adjustment where the movie excels. There have been too many films to directly or indirectly address the battle that wages on between us and our supposed enemies but not one like this which addresses the human toll that costs many men and women their sanity.

    The movie challenges you to assess which would be worse, fighting in a war and killing those you hate or ringing the doorbell of a stranger and killing those who you don’t even know with just a few words, and rewards you with surprises that make this so much more than just a movie about getting back into the swing of normal day-to-day living. Foster, whose behavior might seem strange, opting to don sunglasses in the middle of the night, or Harrelson, who can outdo Gary Busey in his prime for sheer scenery chewing, are a wild pair that completely satisfy as case studies for the silent deaths these men have to endure long after bullets have stopped slicing past their helmets.

    The editing, for those that care about these sorts of things, allow scenes to breathe in a way that helps front load the emotional impact for what’s happening on the screen. For instance, when the duo is relaying the news of a soldier’s death to the father of the service member, played by Steve Buscemi, the scene is just allowed to play out in a way that not only felt organic but heightened the devastating impact the moment had on both characters. It’s but one of many moments that Moverman earns as a director looking to create a connection rather than making a moment to exploit. By the time Samantha Morton enters the film, as a woman who learns of her husband’s death through Foster, you are ready to crumble under the weight for what Moverman has already established. We get and understand the impact and you fully buy into the story that unravels between these people.

    The Messenger is a film that not only deserves your time but, I would assert, deserves your attention and heart. It’s a movie that shows you what the ravages of war can do a man but it also shows you how that man can be put back together if all the elements are present; sometimes they are and sometimes they are not and it’s the latter ones that are completely devastating.

    About the movie:

    Co-written by Oren Moverman and Alessandro Camon, THE MESSENGER is a powerful and tender story about a returned war hero making his first steps toward a normal life.

    In his first leading role, Foster stars as Will Montgomery, a U.S. Army officer who has just returned home from a tour in Iraq and is assigned to the Army’s Casualty Notification service. Partnered with fellow officer Tony Stone (Harrelson) to bear the bad news to the loved ones of fallen soldiers, Will faces the challenge of completing his mission while seeking to find comfort and healing back on the home front. When he finds himself drawn to Olivia (Morton), to whom he has just delivered the news of her husband’s death, Will’s emotional detachment begins to dissolve and the film reveals itself as a surprising, humorous, moving and very human portrait of grief, friendship and survival.

    Featuring tour-de-force performances from Foster, Harrelson and Morton, and a brilliant directorial debut by Moverman, THE MESSENGER brings us into the inner lives of these outwardly steely heroes to reveal their fragility with compassion and dignity.

    Pulling  John- DVD Review

    pulling-john-3d-box-artLet’s just get this right out of the way: I was sold that Over The Top was the probably the best movie to come out in the winter of 1987.

    There was something about the allure of Sylvester Stallone, still riding on the fame that made him the most bankable action star of the 80’s, in a role that was for all intents and purposes family friendly. That said, this documentary about guys who really do want to reach each other half-way but not necessarily across the sky, Pumping John is one entertaining film.

    The movie deals with one man who has reigned for 25 years, a quarter of a century, as the all-time grand champion of this sport. And make no mistake, as you see these men train and internalize the nature of what they do, this is a sport. There are fans of this man and his legacy and you would half-think that the oddballs that the film showcases as wanting to dethrone the patriarch of the sport would be somehow a goof or funny. While there are some unintended moments that are humorous there is a real heart in this movie and I cannot believe it took this long to discover this independent gem.

    About the movie:

    A TOP 10 MUST SEE FILM FROM SXSW AND WINNER OF 10 INTERNATIONAL AUDIENCE AWARDS, THIS IS THE SWEAT-DRENCHED STORY OF A CHAMPION’S GLORY IN AN UNSUNG, OFFBEAT SPORT — ARM WRESTLING

    A living legend in a sport he helped popularize, John Brzenk has enjoyed a 25 year run as the undefeated arm wrestling champion of the world.  Yet, at the age of 40, he’s consumed by one question: should he retire on top or succumb to the inevitable: a loss to a new champion.  PULLING JOHN, the rousing and universal story of a champion’s glory in an unsung sport, debuts this May on DVD in an extras-loaded version”¦only from IndiePix.

    In the vein of dramatic, championship-caliber docs, Bigger, Faster, Stronger and King of Kong, PULLING JOHN is a feature-length verite shot over four years which follows Brzenk, the legendary armwrestler, who works as an airline mechanic by day and now must decide whether to leave the sport he was raised on.  Taking a journey to the far corners of the world where men define themselves by trying to beat the undisputed champ, the film visits with 23 year old Alexy Voevoda from Sochi , Russia and Charlestown, West Virginia ‘s 26 year old Travis Bagent, colorful characters who have been raised on the legend of Brzenk.  And, in a philosophical and thrilling ride through human nature, PULLING JOHN culminates at the Zloty Tur Championship in Warsaw , where Bagent and Voevoda have the chance of their life — to dethrone the conflicted champion.

    About PULLING JOHN, San Diego City Beat says, “once you’ve watched it, you’ll be shocked that you’ve never heard of John Brzenk” and, Spout.com says “you will find yourself screaming out loud!”Â  Don’t miss out on this thrilling film, which IndiePix is presenting in widescreen with Dolby Digital 2.0 Stereo; also featured are bonuses including commentary from director Vassiliki Khonsari and Brzenk, a Pulling John graphic comic, over 50 minutes of additional scenes and more!

    Yesterday Was  A Lie – DVD Review

    yesterdayYes, when you read a description that uses the words avant-garde 99% of the time you should run in the other direction. Most likely what you’ll get is a movie that is so into itself it negates the possibility of anyone else liking it.

    Not here, though, as this movie is a genuine treat that both entices and rewards on multiple levels. It feels like a noir thriller that ought to exist somewhere in the 30’s or 40’s with its mimimalist set design, cinematography and music choices. The story revolves around a hard nosed female detective on a case that, while it would be useless to try and compress into a neat paragraph, blends the scientific with the very mundane aspects of filmmaking that have long since been tossed aside.

    While not steampunk by any means, the movie still feels like a hybrid of the very old and the very modern. Director/writer James Kerwin blends some fantastic elements that deal with the nature of space and time with a fun take on the old gumshoe who just can’t say no to the sauce.

    Again, looking at the film’s description you would be hard pressed to want to check out a movie that seems like a blend of too many genres but I can assure you that it’s worth watching simply for Kipleigh Brown’s portrayal as the weather beaten detective Hoyle and for Chase Masterson of Star Trek: Deep Space Nine fame. These two together make seeking this movie out entitrely worth it. Kerwin, as well, deserves much love and respect for crafting a story that not only  works as a noir throwback but it also succeeds in bending your mind’s eye as it challenges your expectations of a film dealing with the subject matter it does. Such a wonderful outing for a filmmaker that finally does take a risk in a landscape of directors who play it safe.

    About the movie:

    Combining “stunning black-and-white cinematography, a sultry jazz score and a refreshingly high-minded script,” YESTERDAY WAS A LIE is a groundbreaking new metaphysical noir thriller from writer/director James Kerwin. Exploring mind-twisting modern sci-fi themes including the nature of time, reality and human consciousness, this acclaimed independent feature and U.S. theatrical release has received over a dozen film festival Best Feature awards and virtually unanimous critical praise.  This April, sci-fi fans everywhere will rejoice as YESTERDAY WAS A LIE, the latest feature from genre-favorite stars Chase Masterson and Peter Mayhew, makes its eagerly anticipated DVD debut for $24.98 SRP ““ only from E1 Entertainment.

    In YESTERDAY WAS A LIE, Kipleigh Brown “exudes Bacall[2]” as Hoyle, a girl with a sharp mind and a weakness for bourbon who finds herself on the trail of a reclusive genius (John Newton).  But her work takes a series of unforeseen twists as events around her grow increasingly fragmented, disconnected and surreal.  With a sexy lounge singer (Chase Masterson) and a loyal partner (Mik Scriba, The Last Seduction) as her only allies, Hoyle is plunged into a dark world of intrigue and earth-shattering cosmological secrets.  Haunted by an ever-present shadow (Peter Mayhew) whom she is destined to face, Hoyle discovers that the most powerful force in the universe – the power to bend reality, the power to know the truth – lies within the depths of the human heart.   The film also stars Nathan Mobley, Warren Davis, Megan Henning, Jennifer Slimko and famed radio personality Robert Siegel.

    Named one of the year’s “Ten Best Films on the Festival Circuit” by Film Threat, YESTERDAY WAS A LIE opened theatrically late in 2009 to rave theatrical reviews after successful screenings in over 50 festivals on four continents. The film has won numerous accolades including Best Director, Best Screenplay and Best Cinematography at Visionfest and was an Official Selection at the Barbados International Film Festival and the St. Louis International Film Festival, among others.

    Presented in 16×9 with 5.1 Surround Sound, the YESTERDAY WAS A LIE DVD features English SDH Subtitles and is supplemented by an amazing array of bonus features.  Extras include a feature-length audio commentary by James Kerwin, Kipleigh Brown and Chase Masterson as well as multiple making-of featurettes, interviews with the cast and crew as well as a production stills photo gallery.  Produced by Helicon Arts Cooperative, the film is rated PG by the MPAA for language, some violent content and smoking.

    YESTERDAY WAS A LIE will also be available for digital streaming in 720 HD on iTunes and Netflix. For more information about the film, visit www.yesterdaywasalie.com.

    Giggle, Giggle, Quack and Runaway Ralph – DVD Review

    giggle51j6rtjemyl_sl500_aa300_So…I sat my four year-old and six year-old in front of the television to watch the latest from Scholastic Storybook Treasures in order to get an accurate bead of whether anyone else in their cohort class would find this fun or at least mildly entertaining.

    I took this as an opportunity to see whether they would enjoy the experience of reading along with a movie. Honestly, it’s one of the things which I thought would be a primer for their eventual exposure to foreign films which, as a cineaste,  I hoped they would enjoy as much as I do.

    I’ll tell you what, it sure beats having to sit through an insufferable little twit named Caillou or a troubled chimp known as Curious George.

    Giggle, Giggle, Quack is a collection of stories read by Abagail Breslin (Little Miss Sunshine), Alexander Gould (the voice of Finding Nemo and regular on Weeds), and Country/Western star Randy Travis is a solid choice for any parent out there looking to buy a DVD that you’ll at least be able to sit through and not count the minutes go by. Runaway Ralph, penned by the Ernest Hemmingway of kids fiction, Beverly Cleary, was just as entertaining to both kids as the two discs offered both long form and short form entertainment.

    While Giggle, with it’s collection of five different stories on the disc, obviously appeals to the shorter attention spans of kids who just want brevity over substance you cannot go wrong. The stories are fun, are animated well and honestly do offer a literacy component should you decide that reading is somehow fundamental to nurturing a well-balanced kid. Runaway Ralph, as I could have suspected, appealed more to the six year-old as she’s learning to appreciate longer stories and is eagerly consuming works where she can read aloud. Now, for all her enthusiasm I think she’s just reading and not genuinely comprehending everything I at least appreciated that this movie sparked an action something other than drooling complicity as the television does all the entertaining.

    As it is with a lot of kids, the collection of stories hold up to repeat viewings, and more repeat viewings, and even more repeat viewings, just fine. As the unwitting recipient of a multiple view marathon I can attest that after showing my kids the read along function they could not watch it without having it on.

    The fact of the matter is that there is a dearth of good entertainment for kids out there and there really is only so much artistic growth that a show like Yo Gabba Gabba can engender.  It’s nice to know that, for at least a little while, these two discs kept my kids attention.

    About Giggle, Giggle, Quack:

    Spring into spring with Scholastic Storybook Treasuresâ„¢, as they release a new collection of colorfully animated stories adapted from tales by best-selling author Doreen Cronin.  Featuring everyone’s favorite personified animals, GIGGLE, GIGGLE, QUACK “¦ AND MORE STORIES BY DOREEN CRONIN includes adaptations of many of the author’s best-loved books and celebrity narration by Abigail Breslin (Little Miss Sunshine), Alexander Gould (Weeds) and Grammy® Award-winning singer Randy Travis. The DVD, which supports reading comprehension, vocabulary and problem solving, will be available in stores and at newkideo.com on March 30th for $14.95SRP.

    The title story is the hilarious sequel to “Click, Clack, Moo: Cows That Type”.  This time, Farmer Brown’s animals pull their old tricks on Farmer Brown’s brother, Bob.  Duck instigates the action, ordering pizza with anchovies for the hens and renting “The Sound of Moosic” for the cows.  The lively animation and witty ploys of the animals will keep kids laughing, as will Randy Travis’ warm and humorous style of narration. Adapted from Cronin’s story and Betsy Lewin’s illustrations Weston Woods Studios original production captured an Andrew Carnegie Medal for Excellence in Children’s Video and Notable Video selection by the American Library Association.

    GIGGLE, GIGGLE, QUACK “¦ AND MORE STORIES BY DOREEN CRONIN also includes four additional stories, animated from the original storybook illustrations of Betsy Lewin and Harry Bliss: “Dooby Dooby Moo”, “Duck for President” and the best-selling “Diary of a Worm” and “Diary of a Fly.” As an exclusive bonus, the DVD also includes an interview with illustrator Harry Bliss and Spanish versions of “Giggle, Giggle, Quack” and “Duck for President.”

    Perfect for early readers, ages 3 to 8, the DVD features an enhanced read-along function and NEW Talk about the Story questions to enhance early literacy skills.  Children will also have the opportunity to hone their bilingual skills with the two of Spanish adaptations, which also includes the enhanced read-along where they words are highlighted as they are read.

    The SCHOLASTIC STORYBOOK TREASURES series hails from the vaults of Weston Woods Studios, world-renowned for their careful film and video adaptations of best-selling children’s storybooks. Librarians and teachers around the country have long been using these very same productions, created by Weston Woods Studios with authors and illustrators, to enhance their students’ pre-reading experiences. Founded more than 50 years ago, and now a division of Scholastic, Weston Woods continues to produce top-notch video storytelling.  SCHOLASTIC  STORYBOOK TREASURES collects and presents these productions for the home marketplace and has, since its launch in 2003, become a top award-winning home video franchise for children.

    About Runaway Ralph:

    Beverly Cleary’s beloved and rascally character Ralph S. Mouse comes to life in live action DVD based on a best-selling children’s book, RUNAWAY RALPH, The latest in the acclaimed Scholastic Storybook Treasuresâ„¢ collection, this newly remastered edition of RUNAWAY RALPH supports reading comprehension, vocabulary and problem solving, and will be available in stores and at newkideo.com on April 27 for $14.95SRP.

    RUNAWAY RALPH is the third installment of Cleary’s classic tales building on the adventure and excitement of THE MOUSE ANDTHE MOTORCYCLE and RALPH S. MOUSE (both available on DVD from Scholastic Storybook Treasures).  Ralph is tired of living at the quaint and quiet Mountain View Inn and dealing with his annoying relatives. He longs for “a life of speed and danger and excitement.” He certainly gets his wish when he sets off on his mouse-sized motorcycle and meets a series of fur-raising adventures. After some run-ins with the resident cat at the Happy Acres Summer Camp, Ralph befriends a young boy named Garfield and helps him through a difficult decision. In this fantastic tale of friendship and growing up, Ralph learns that the wild is not necessarily better than home, even with all its problems, The original film production won an Emmy nomination and awards from the American Library Association and the  Columbus Film Festival.

    Perfect for early readers, ages 3 to 8, the DVD features an enhanced read-along function and Talk about the Story questions to enhance early literacy skills. The DVD also includes the bonus story Commander Toad in Space (based on the book by Jane Yolen).

    The SCHOLASTIC STORYBOOK TREASURES series hails from the vaults of Weston Woods Studios, world-renowned for their careful film and video adaptations of best-selling children’s storybooks. Librarians and teachers around the country have long been using these very same productions, created by Weston Woods Studios with authors and illustrators, to enhance their students’ pre-reading experiences. Founded more than 50 years ago, and now a division of Scholastic, Weston Woods continues to produce top-notch video storytelling.  SCHOLASTIC  STORYBOOK TREASURES collects and presents these productions for the home marketplace and has, since its launch in 2003, become a top award-winning home video franchise for children.

  • Trailer Park: MacGruber

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    Check out my new column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

    MacGruber – Free Passes

    macLook, I’m probably the last guy in the world who this movie should have appealed to but the trailers got me.

    Bad, lewd humor mixed with Will Forte’s comedic flair and Kristen Wiig’s more than ample ability to just be funny at any moment, the trailers that were rolled out for this movie did a spectacular job in just making the sale. They convinced me that I should at least strongly consider giving my money to them and, God love ’em, their pitch was solid with both the green and red banner trailers that no doubt hit multiple parts of the viewership demo.

    For those Arizonans that would like to see this film Thursday, May 20th, at 7:00 p.m. at Harkins Tempe Marketplace please shoot me a line at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com and let me know you’re interested in winning some tickets.

    For those living under a city sized rock and don’t yet know what this movie is about, here’s your breakdown:

    Only one American hero has earned the rank of Green Beret, Navy SEAL and Army Ranger. Just one operative has been awarded 16 purple hearts, 3 Congressional Medals of Honor and 7 presidential medals of bravery. And only one guy is man enough to still sport a mullet. In 2010, Will Forte brings Saturday Night Live’s clueless soldier of fortune to the big screen in the action comedy MacGruber.

    In the 10 years since his fiancée was killed, special op MacGruber has sworn off a life of fighting crime with his bare hands. But when he learns that his country needs him to find a nuclear warhead that’s been stolen by his sworn enemy, Dieter Von Cunth (Val Kilmer), MacGruber figures he’s the only one tough enough for the job.

    Assembling an elite team of experts-Lt. Dixon Piper (Ryan Phillippe) and Vicki St. Elmo (Kristen Wiig)-MacGruber will navigate an army of assassins to hunt down Cunth and bring him to justice. His methods may be unorthodox. His crime scenes may get messy. But if you want the world saved right, you call in MacGruber.

  • Trailer Park: IRON MAN 2

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    Check out my new column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

    Robin Hood – Free Passes

    robinhood_posterWho lives in Arizona and wants to see Russell Crowe dispatch dirty peasants with a bow and arrow?

    I sure do. After loving every last morsel of the last Russell Crowe/Ridley Scott team-up this film at least gets an emotional buy-in simply because lighting may very well strike twice.

    For those that would like to see this film Tuesday, May 11th, at 7:00 at Harkins Fashion Square please shoot me a line at Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com and let me know you’re interested in winning some tickets. I don’t have many so get those entries in quick.

    And, for those that need an explanation of what this movie has in store for you, read the film’s description:

    Oscar winner Russell Crowe stars as the legendary figure known by generations as “Robin Hood,” whose exploits have endured in popular mythology and ignited the imagination of those who share his spirit of adventure and righteousness. In 13th century England, Robin and his band of marauders confront corruption in a local village and lead an uprising against the crown that will forever alter the balance of world power. And whether thief or hero, one man from humble beginnings will become an eternal symbol of freedom for his people.

    The untitled Robin Hood adventure chronicles the life of an expert archer, previously interested only in self-preservation, from his service in King Richard’s army against the French. Upon Richard’s death, Robin travels to Nottingham, a town suffering from the corruption of a despotic sheriff and crippling taxation, where he falls for the spirited widow Lady Marion (Oscar winner Cate Blanchett), a woman skeptical of the identity and motivations of this crusader from the forest. Hoping to earn the hand of Maid Marion and salvage the village, Robin assembles a gang whose lethal mercenary skills are matched only by its appetite for life. Together, they begin preying on the indulgent upper class to correct injustices under the sheriff.

    With their country weakened from decades of war, embattled from the ineffective rule of the new king and vulnerable to insurgencies from within and threats from afar, Robin and his men heed a call to ever greater adventure. This unlikeliest of heroes and his allies set off to protect their country from slipping into bloody civil war and return glory to England once more.

    Tokyo Sonata – DVD Review

    tokyosonata_3dSuch an endearing film, this movie from Kiyoshi Kurosawa explores some of the more quiet aspects of live in modern Japan.

    One of the funny things about Kurosawa is that most who do know his name know it from his work in the horror genre. A movie that departs greatly from that wheelhouse, Tokyo Sonata is an overlooked gem from last year that not only reaffirmed my own sense of what it means to be a family but that Kurosawa knows how to transcend cultural mores and tell a story about a man who loses his job and tries to hold on to the lie as kids, wife unravel before his eyes.

    It’s a bittersweet movie that is genuinely funny but it’s also an introspective film that is gorgeous to look at while seeing that there is some real pathos happening before you. The performances are uniformly excellent especially Kyoko Koizumi, who plays the put upon matriarch of the family, who becomes something of a force to reckon with as she evolves in this family that tries to pull through what is ostensibly the most difficult time in their lives.

    Do not miss what I wish I could have seen in the theaters, the lush cinematography showing the natural ebb and flow of life in Japan, and a movie that can speak to what modern families have to deal with in a time that knows no geographical or social boundaries.

    About the film:

    FROM INTERNATIONALLY-RENOWNED DIRECTOR KIYOSHI KUROSAWA COMES A “HAUNTING AND MASTERFUL” FILM, WINNER OF THE PRESTIGIOUS CANNES UN CERTAIN REGARD JURY PRIZE

    Best known in the United States for unsettling horror films like PULSE and CURE, internationally recognized director Kiyoshi Kurosawa ventures away from the genre with TOKYO SONATA. Probing the dark side of human nature and the social problems that confront contemporary Japan, this highly acclaimed 2009 theatrical release was awarded the Un Certain Regard Jury Prize at the 2009 Cannes Film Festival, as well as capturing Best Film and Best Screenwriter at the Asian Film Awards.

    Equal parts social commentary and situational comedy, the atmospheric TOKYO SONATA is a story of an ordinary Japanese family of four. The father, Ryuhei Sasaki, like any other Japanese businessman, is faithfully devoted to his work. His wife, Megumi, left on her own to manage the house, struggles to retain a bond with her oldest son in college, Takashi, and the youngest, Kenji, a sensitive boy in elementary school. From the exterior the family is seemingly normal, save for the tiny schisms that exist within. However, after Ryuhei unexpectedly loses his job, the quiet unraveling of the family beings.

    Facing completely unfamiliar circumstances, Ryuhei decides not to tell his family and begins his lonely sojourn into the world of the secretly unemployed. Along with many other businessmen who save face by concealing their shameful reality from family and friends, Ryuhei begins to depart each day for work, when, in fact, he kills time in libraries and parks. His lies and torment go unnoticed by Takashi, who becomes increasingly despondent and alienated from his family, and Megumi, who can no longer summon the will to keep her family together. And, the longer his charade goes on, the less control he has as patriarch, creating an even deeper divide between him and his family.

    TOKYO SONATA is presented in Japanese with English subtitles, and includes a “Making Of” Featurette, Cannes Festival Footage and Panel Interviews and Interviews with the Cast and Crew.

    California Dreamin’ – DVD Review

    califronia-dreamin_2d_hWhen I was in Ireland I picked up a book called “Turn Left at Greenland.”

    It was a book that talked about what America looks like through the eyes of a foreign news correspondent living and working within our borders. It was an odd thing, seeing our country from someone that doesn’t call this home but it’s perfectly apt in order to describe the feeling of watching this movie from filmmaker, and Romanian, Cristian Nemescu.

    The movie deals with a military intelligence officer, played with deft playfulness by Armand Assante, who finds himself stuck on the way to Kosovo in some faceless Romanian that could be any number of small hamlets in this part of the world, that has to navigate his way out of being held almost hostage in a farce that at once illuminates what we look like to others and how we deal with ourselves. The ugly American, uncouth around those who are simply living their own lives as we try and impose our will to fit our needs, is on full display here but the reason this movie excels masterfully is because how sly it is. It’s not enough to come right out and say what’s on this film’s mind, this movie plays with your expectations and lets the action on the screen tell the story.

    Is America the strong willed bully who likes to play the part of imperialist? If Nemescu’s movie is any indication it is but there are bright spots to be found within its stubbornness. Make no mistake about it, either. Nemescu skewers his own culture as well, pointing out that while we have our own problems no one is perfect by any stretch.

    It’s disappointing that this is Nemescu’s only film, he died in a car accident before being able to properly edit this film down before it made its bow at Cannes in 2007, but this is a gem of a movie that talks global politics that still have meaning today in an age when this film explains so much about our involvement inside Pakistan and Iraq.

    About the film:

    THE AWARD-WINNING ““ AND ONLY ““ FILM FROM ONE OF THE WORLD’S GREAT YOUNG DIRECTORS, WHO DIED BEFORE ITS RELEASE

    In the tradition of great black comedies about war ““ from Dr. Strangelove and M*A*S*H to Three Kings and In the Loop ““ comes CALIFORNIA DREAMIN’, one of the masterpieces of what’s been called the Romanian new wave. This vital and globally honored movie was the only feature film from brilliant young director Cristian Nemescu.

    The fact-based story proves that truth is stranger ““ and more absurd ““ than fiction. It’s 1999, and the bloody civil war in Yugoslavia is underway. A platoon of American Marines has arrived in Constanta , Romania , with a shipment of military radar meant to be deployed near the Serbian border in support of NATO air raids. No-nonsense Captain Doug Jones (Golden Globe winner Armand Assante in a career performance) is in charge of transporting the equipment by train across Romania , but when the train is stopped in a remote village, Jones and his men must contend with the corrupt and terrifying stationmaster, Doiaru (Razvan Vasilescu), who’s also the local strongman and black market operator. The Marines become the “guests” of a poor village filled with frustrating bureaucracy, sexy young women on the make, and odd pop culture celebrations. Can Americans really bring order and hope to this chaotic part of the world, or is that just California dreamin’?

    Five Minutes of Heaven – DVD Review

    fmoh_3d_lThis is a movie that you ought to seek out and enjoy for the high level of screenwriting and visual flair for cinematography.

    A movie about two men, James Nesbitt and Liam Neeson, Catholic and Protestant respectively, who both had a part in the fighting that took place in the mid-1970s as these two religious groups fought a bloody war of politics and religion. All grown up, they are being chauffeured for a face-to-face, televised meeting. The real draw of the film, then, is how these two men find themselves here as they reflect on the events of their youth.

    Filled with murder and rage, both men have their own sins to atone for but Oliver Hirschbiegel, director of the indescribably good Downfall, looks at these two people not to be pitied but to be understood. Screenwriter Guy Hibbert’s script is filled with moments that let you know this is a writer’s film, not a movie based on the quick cuts and violence you would expect out of a Tom Clancy novel if it were to be written about this chance meeting.

    The rage that still simmers beneath the thin veneer of older age is deliciously depicted and honestly makes the case as to why there is some pain that will never be sated until revenge is exacted. But the movie is so much more than revenge fantasies and recompense, it’s a movie that should leave you thinking about how our own conflicts, no matter how personal they may be, can find a way to be exercised. I found my palms sweaty more than once and it’s due to a movie that wants to personalize, not dehumanize, it’s characters.

    Seek this film out if a jangling Irish accent and the allure of a movie that wants to take its time with you is something you desire. Revenge is a dish best served cold but what happens after it’s on the table? This movie tells you exactly what happens.

    About the film:

    IN A PLACE WHERE BLOODY CONFLICT IS ALL MANY PEOPLE HAVE EVER KNOWN, SOME WOUNDS MAY PROVE TOO DEEP FOR TIME TO HEAL

    Liam Neeson Stars in the Latest Triumph From Oscar® Nominee Oliver Hirschbiegel.

    “The past is not dead. In fact, it isn’t even past.” The famous line from Faulkner could serve to describe FIVE MINUTES OF HEAVEN, the acclaimed suspenseful thriller about the long-lasting pain caused by the Troubles in Northern Ireland . That violent conflict has been the basis for many memorable movies, but few as gripping as Oscar-nominated director Oliver Hirschbiegel’s film, which features career performances by international stars Liam Neeson and James Nesbitt.

    FIVE MINUTES OF HEAVEN is based on true events. It’s 1975 and conflict has been underway for years between the predominantly Catholic nationalists who want to end British control of Northern Ireland and the predominantly Protestant loyalists. Alistair Little, a 16-year-old Protestant member of the Ulster Volunteer Force, is anxious to earn his stripes and, along with his group, is given the go-ahead to kill an Ulster Catholic as reprisal for IRA attacks. Their target is 19-year-old Jim Griffen. The murder is witnessed by Griffen’s 11-year-old brother Joe.

    Three decades later, Little (Neeson, star of “Taken” and “Schindler’s List”) has been rehabilitated and released from prison, while Joe Griffen (Nesbitt, who led the cast of Paul Greengrass’ Northern Ireland historical drama “Bloody Sunday”) remains traumatized and bitter. When a television talk show brings them together for a live on-air reconciliation, two men haunted by one moment must come face to face with their own worlds of pain and violence ““ and the ever-present threat of revenge.

    FIVE MINUTES OF HEAVEN won the Directing Award and the World Cinema Screenwriting Award, and was nominated for the Grand Jury Prize, at the 2009 Sundance Film Festival.

    Oliver Hirschbiegel previously directed the Best Foreign-Language Film Oscar nominee “Downfall,” about Hitler’s final days, and the sci-fi thriller “The Invasion,” starring Nicole Kidman and Daniel Craig. BAFTA-winning screenwriter Guy Hibbert’s impressive body of work includes “Omagh” and “Prime Suspect.” Also in the FIVE MINUTES OF HEAVEN cast is Anamaria Marinca, star of the Cannes Golden Palm winner “4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days” as well as Francis Ford Coppola’s “Youth Without Youth.”

    Iron Man 2 – Review

    4918_1594708762When last we left our hero, he was on a podium proclaiming himself to be the real iron man. There was much fanfare and celebration but how does Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) fare in issue 2 of this comic book character come to life?

    Well, considering this is perhaps the most expensive romantic comedy ever made I would say it’s a success on multiple levels.

    That’s one of the things you’ll notice, if you’re feeling your way through Jon Favreau’s latest, a real sense that this is a pure four quadrant movie that appeals to every single, last demographic. It seems made with the intent to fully embrace every last man, woman, and child with its focus on bringing the most amount of action with the most amount of family friendly permissible T&A along with peppering the dialogue with enough mature bon mots and double entendres to make any parent squirmy. There seems to be a real need to be liked on all levels going on within this picture that you can’t help but feel that Favreau has delivered a movie that gives the people what they want, all of them, and, what’s remarkable, there isn’t any slack in this film. Every moment is earned, every line pushing this film to its eventual breaking point. I think, and if there is any indication that this movie isn’t as good as it could have been I couldn’t point it out, the movie doesn’t take a definitive stance with regard to its voice. In much the same way that Dark Knight had its voice, how X2 absolutely had one that set it apart from its peers and how Spider-Man 2 possessed one that made it a classic, Iron Man 2 is lacking in that regard. There are missed opportunities to delve deep into the man who wears this suit of iron, passed over chances to get beyond the snappy one-liners (and they are snappy thanks to Justin Theroux’s ear for witty rejoinders and Downey Jr.’s unmatchable delivery, creating a character with his own unique patios), and it all adds up to a movie that truly embraces the summer movie aesthetic in the most fun way possible.

    Meeting up with Stark, mere moments after where the first movie leaves off, we are right back to where we were when we last saw him. Basking in the glorious attention and filled with the kind of macho, funny bravado that made him such a delight in part 1. He’s in dire need of purpose when we meet up with him, although his tough candy shell would rather deflect than recognize how empty his castle really is, and this movie is all about this man’s quest for something more than dominance over the scientific and controllable. It’s a movie about a man’s need for love not only from the man who made him but from a woman that confounds him. What’s curious about the latter storyline is that it permeates the entire film. Tony tries to communicate the very human feelings which he’s been so adept at keeping sublimated towards Pepper Potts (Gwyneth Paltrow) but, like every good romantic comedy, it’s never quite the right time. The movie is brilliant in keeping every person who is seeing this movie invested on what’s happening, like a politician who relentlessly plays to his constituents, but that’s also where the movie loses its ability to some something more than just a great summer film.

    One of the story’s issues is Downey’s indulgence in excess, namely alcohol. Saving you the pain of getting into too much comic book fanboy detail there was a nine issue story arc within the Iron Man series in 1979 that dealt with Tony’s alcoholism. It was hailed then, and still is now, as one of the most important stories of the Iron Man saga. This was a chance to give the film a deep anchor, an opportunity for resonance far beyond the box office, but instead the subplot is given short shrift, relegated to a relatively quick realization and fixing of a problem as if it were a cut needing a band-aid. It was disappointing to see it used and rushed though so flippantly but, to come back as to why the film works on the levels it does, you can see why that decision was made. Mass appeal does not equate to an episode of Intervention, hence, it was ditched. Besides, he’s got bad guys to dispatch.

    The villains of this picture, Mickey Rourke and Sam Rockwell, play opposite ends of the evil spectrum that simply boggle the mind. Rockwell, playing arms manufacturer Justin Hammer, ought to be the kind of slippery cad that knows no boundaries and delight in being the kind of foil to Tony Stark worthy of our condemnation. Instead, he’s played like an ass, a buffoon. It confounds the mind to try and think of why you would want to have a man capable of so much dirty dealing and evil come off like a doofus who is only able to get out of bed without hurting himself by happenstance. Or, is it because Mickey Rourke, as the mighty Whiplash, tries to steal the show as he turns in a performance as one of the better villains we’ve ever been given in a movie like this? Unfortunately, there is not much to steal as we only get fits and starts with regard to his character, he appears briefly and we aren’t really given much beyond a few biographical factoids and tidbits. To Rourke’s credit, however, he uses what little time is given him to his advantage. Coming off a sympathetic turn in The Wrestler, he is able to play that other side, where the villainy oozes out of every dirty pore, every unwashed piece of hair.

    The film’s action set pieces, much like the first, are good and serviceable to a large degree. The CGI elements are pronounced in some areas and do take away from some of the passion that no doubt we’re supposed to feel as Iron Man defends truth, justice and the American way. If Justin Hammer’s eventual downfall is any representational barometer of the final act it is that the film’s action ends with a little more than a fizzled dream; exciting and somewhat filled with potential, sure, but it all comes crashing down quickly and with little more than a mild skirmish which ends exactly the way it should with there being no real danger to anyone or anything. Favreau hasn’t or didn’t learn anything from the all too brief ending to the first film as you go from final confrontation to resolution at breakneck speed. There is no savoring of the moment, no real drama, and the film suffers because of it. Not to be too glib about it but once the final confrontation happens you only have seconds to pay attention or else risk seeing how the ending plays itself out.

    Iron Man 2 as a summer artifact is one that fulfills every promise of what a summer tent pole should be: loud, bright, quick, and filled with enough for everyone. It’s a movie that will appeal to a wide spectrum of people on many levels. However, if there is anything to take away from this movie it is that this was a film that consciously decided it was not going to be anything more than what we’ve been given. It’s serviceable, fun but it lacks anything that will carry on long after you see the final moments on the screen. It’s disappointing that it couldn’t stretch beyond comic book-like depth but it’s nonetheless a good reason to get out of the house and enjoy on a big screen.

  • Trailer Park: THE GOOD HEART & ITS COMPLICATED

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    Check out my new column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

    The Good Heart – Poster Giveaway

    goodheart_poster_1-535x793Those who saw There Will Be Blood ought to err on the side of hyperbole when describing Paul Dano’s performance in that film.

    Movies like Little Miss Sunshine and Gigantic have shown Dano to be an actor who isn’t just earning roles based on how he looks on the cover of Entertainment Weekly, espousing him as the next new “IT” actor, he’s getting work because he’s just good at what he does.

    That looks like it’s continuing with the movie The Good Heart, a film by Dagur Kári. Kári directed 2003’s wonderful Nói, a movie about a boy looking to escape his life in one of the more honest and truthful looks into teenage frustration ever to be made. The Good Heart looks like it is another film that wants to just zero in on a few people and let the actors work their way through it. It’s an intimate portrait of people living on the edge of nothingness and, in support of the film, I have two posters SIGNED by Paul Dano himself. If you’re interested in winning just shoot me your favorite Paul Dano movie and I’ll enter you in a drawing to win one of these beauties. The address is Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com.

    The Good Heart opens today in theaters.

    The film’s synoposis:

    Brian Cox stars as Jacques, the curmudgeonly owner of a gritty   New York dive bar that serves as home to a motley assortment of professional drinkers. Jacques is determinedly drinking and smoking himself to death when he meets Lucas (Dano), a homeless young man who has already given up on life.  Determined to keep his legacy alive, Jacques deems Lucas is a fitting heir and takes him under his wing, schooling him in the male-centric laws of his alcoholic clubhouse: no new customers, no fraternizing with customers and, absolutely no women. Lucas is a quick study, but their friendship is put to the test when the distraught and beautiful April (Isild Le Besco) shows up at the bar seeking shelter, and Lucas insists they help her out.

    It’s Complicated – DVD Giveaway

    itscomplicated_posterI realize that this movie’s inclusion into such a testosterone fulled column is a little strange, weird even.

    Fact of the matter remains, though, that like LL Cool J, the ladies love me. Hey, it’s not a fact I really want to believe but how can I deny the 50% of my audience who carry the double X the opportunity to feel special? So, in that regard I am bringing you a contest to win one of a few DVDs for the latest cinematic gem from Nancy Meyers, directorial talent behind Something’s Gotta Give, What Women Want, and even The Holiday. Clearly, if you haven’t seen any of these movies you haven’t had a significant other in quite some time. On top of feeling sorry for you I am going to humbly request you not enter this contest as I want people who have an idea of what Hollywood thinks of love to get this little gem added to their collection.

    All you need to do in order to be entered into this drawing is to send me your name and address to Christopher_Stipp@yahoo.com.

    It’s Complicated is now out on DVD and Blu-ray

    More about the film:

    Jane (Streep) is the mother of three grown kids, owns a thriving Santa Barbara bakery/restaurant and has – after a decade of divorce – an amicable relationship with her ex-husband, attorney Jake (Baldwin). But when Jane and Jake find themselves out of town for their son’s college graduation, things start to get complicated. An innocent meal together turns into the unimaginable – an affair. With Jake remarried to the much younger Agness (Lake Bell), Jane is now, of all things, the other woman.

    Caught in the middle of their renewed romance is Adam (Martin), an architect hired to remodel Jane’s kitchen. Healing from a divorce of his own, Adam starts to fall for Jane, but soon realizes he’s become part of a love triangle. Should Jane and Jake move on with their lives, or is love truly lovelier the second time around? It’s…complicated.

  • Trailer Park: TOY STORY 3, WHY WE LAUGH: BLACK COMEDIANS ON BLACK COMEDY, & The Phoenix Film Festival

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    Check out my new column, This Week In Trailers, at SlashFilm.com and follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

    Toy Story 3 Footage Preview

    toystory3_poster_8So, I was able to see the first 70 minutes of Toy Story 3 this week.

    Watching the movie begin, hearing the reactions of the college students who literally grew up with this franchise, I was worried something wasn’t going to be right. That there was going to be something there on the screen I could no longer identify with a decade after Toy Story 2 debuted in the theaters. I was shocked that it’s been fifteen years since the first installment came out, the number 95 pasted on the runaway train in the opening sequence feeling like a tender callback to that time.

    I was worried, fraught with nervousness that somehow I made the wrong choice in finding my old college ID from, ironically enough, a decade ago in order to gain admittance to a “Cliffhanger” screening that was only going to show 70 of, ostensibly, a 90 minute movie. As the film, played out, though, I found more and more to love about a series that always stood for something more than just a movie about some toys. These were indelible characters imbued with a humanity that so many animated films simply failed to replicate. Buzz and Woody were more than just playthings. They were individuals who had emotions like you or I, not giving a thought to the fact they are toys and aren’t humans at all.

    Toy Story 3 makes you realize that this is alpha and omega of animated films because it makes you believe, with deceptive ease, that these machinations of a computer can truly move you. It was almost overwhelming when it hits you, that your friends were back in all their glory, never missing a beat.

    Some have asked why see a movie all the way to the 70 minute mark only to be denied the 20+ minutes left in the film. I know it doesn’t make much sense but when you’ve waited for ten years to see these characters that will never age, and realizing they’ve actually matured in the time since Jesse and Bullseye joined the crew, consuming 3/4ths of the film means that there is still a 1/4 of the movie I still have yet to enjoy. I can savor the delight that was Michael Keaton’s Ken, a true scene stealer. I can anticipate that there is far more to enjoy about Lots-O’-Huggin’ Bear. I know there will be a true moment of sadness still to come when Andy’s departure to college is finally dealt with. And I know that at least one of the characters, unfortunately, will stop speaking Spanish. (Such a fun part of this movie).

    I wanted to be able and talk like a fan, not a critic, of a movie that I genuinely enjoy by not spoiling any of the nuances that this movie strives to give those who have been fans of these movies for so long. I want to be able and talk about all those things that really pull at your heart, to say exactly why Jeff Garlin was an inspired choice for Buttercup, but it’s not my place to spoil anyone’s fun who has been waiting for a decade to see them all together again. I think my purpose here is to be one person to say that everything you hope this movie is, it is. I can’t wait to buy the soundtrack, to feverishly anticipate buying the Blu-ray when it comes out, to taking my kids to see it a few times on the big screen. It’s just that good. There are enough callbacks to the previous films to make it a great time for those who’ve seen the last two, enough “adult” jokes to make it fun for those of us who are harangued into seeing shoddily make kids films from studios who don’t care about being in touch with every member of the audience, and certainly enough emotion in the way the movie makes you care about each and every one of these toys. Especially when a tortilla has to step in for Mr. Potato Head, classic.

    The toys are definitely back and I cannot wait for June 18th. For me, and for my family. It’s hard not to spill about every little detail about what I saw but it was glorious, fantastic fun.

    About the movie:

    The creators of the beloved “Toy Story” films re-open the toy box and bring moviegoers back to the delightful world of Woody, Buzz and our favorite gang of toy characters in TOY STORY 3. Woody and Buzz had accepted that their owner Andy would grow up someday, but what happens when that day arrives? In the third installment, Andy is preparing to depart for college, leaving his loyal toys troubled about their uncertain future.

    Why We Laugh: Black Comedians on Black Comedy – DVD Review

    why-we-laugh-dvd-sWhen I was in my formative years as a youth I gravitated to comedians like Eddie Murphy, Richard Pryor, eating up movies like I’m Gonna Git You Sucka, and, eventually, the whole Wayans clan in In Living Color. I never gave thought to the provenance of the black comedic experience in America. Either out of ignorance or sheer stupidity I never recognized the nuance of how comedy evolved within the black community and its rather tumultuous origins.

    In the new Robert Townsend documentary, a film that played at Sundance last year to much acclaim, Why We Laugh: Black Comedians on Black Comedy is a powerful document to pour over and experience. In understanding how we ended up with Chris Rock, Townsend takes people on a journey that not only starts with minstrel shows and performers like Stepin Fetchit but the documentary excels in explaining the context of black performers who not only played roles that seem to sublimate the feelings of a people who were being marginalized but only appearing as fops, nitwits. The hideousness of blackface isn’t just written off as a practice that can be dismissed but, rather, comedians like Dick Gregory explain why performers did what they had to do and, in fact, some were being compensated well for their complicity.

    It doesn’t make the practice any less vile but the documentary takes the viewer down a well-reasoned path of those things which people have enjoyed but may have never thought to ponder. The struggles that the black community had to overcome, the civil rights era sparking a nationwide fire that rankled many people’s conventions, was expressed in the comedy that was being produced on stage. Again, it was comedians like Dick Gregory who channeled that and trans-morphed it into something that sharp, funny, and piercing. As the modern touchstones of comedy that many in my demo would know right away, Redd Foxx, Richard Pryor, Eddie Murphy, Bill Cosby, Chris Rock, it was Foxx and Cosby who would be the ones to not only transcend the racial barriers we had erected but were the ones to pull in the white audience into their collective experience. This documentary explains how it was more than just comedy to these performers. Some, as Townsend has said, only took the use of bad language and lacked the ability to incorporate social commentary but the movie is careful to pick apart these nuances in a way that shows each comedian for what they were able to accomplish.

    The interviews with the performers could not have been more of a delight as you not only get professorial opinions on the impact these people had to a community needing some kind of release but you get men and women who are usually only known for their outrageous behavior to just slow down for a moment and be real. Realness doesn’t stop with explaining why white people responded so well to Bill Cosby as one of the more introspective moments comes when talking about what Dave Chappelle did when he walked away from millions upon millions. The documentary is worth the price alone for listening to an explanation that is thoughtful, considerate, and wholly honest with regard to its implications.

    Where does black comedy go from here? If this documentary is to be believed it simply needs to keep doing what it has for over a century: be a voice to a community that needs to laugh. To make all of us laugh at a system that was once unjust and unwilling to accept the greatness that were these comedians who only happen, by function of birth, to be black.

    Why We Laugh will be available on April 27th.

    More about the DVD:

    “Why We Laugh” tracks the evolution of black comedy from the character of Stepin Fetchit and minstrels in blackface to the politically tinged humor of Dick Gregory, and from the television success of Good Times and The Jeffersons to the big-screen accomplishments of stars such as Eddie Murphy and Whoopi Goldberg. The film also turns a perceptive eye on the controversial career decision of Dave Chappelle and the implications of corporate efforts to capitalize on the massive success of Russell Simmons’s Def Comedy Jam and Spike Lee’s The Original Kings of Comedy.

    “‘Why We Laugh’ is a major historical contribution to American culture,” said Codeblack executive vice-president Quincy Newell. “This film is a tribute to the way one courageous person with a microphone can change history.”

    Newell produced the documentary which he co-wrote with John Long. The film is based on the book “Black Comedians on Black Comedy: How African-Americans Taught Us to Laugh,” by Darryl J. Littleton. Codeblack’s Clanagan, Richard Foos, and Littleton. Codeblack’s Clanagan, Richard Foos, and Littleton are executive producers on the project.

    Director Townsend has been at the forefront of black cinema for 30 years and received a Career Achievement Award from the American Black Film Festival in 2002.

    The 10th Annual Phoenix Film Festival By Ray Schillaci

    pff_logoFanfare please, for fun, excitement and a near technically flawless anniversary of PFF. Also, to the undaunted filmmakers who continue to provide a vision free of homogenized entertainment to a ravenously hungry public that is in desperate need of something more mature than CGI animals, flat comedies and pandering “movie-of-the-week” dramas that make their way to the big screen via inane studio deals. Now for the naysayers; yes, there were a few blips on the radar of technical difficulties, but compared to so many other film festivals PFF sparkled on their 10th anniversary.

    The parties were an energetic blast with a celebration of 80’s bands and a delirious disco night. The seminars and workshops proved both entertaining and informative while the Kid’s Day gave a glimpse of the limelight to the wide-eyed 5-12 year-old set. Aside from the independent fare higher profile films also graced the screens. Remarkable and touching performances from Martin Landau and Ellen Burstyn in the Arizona Premier of “Lovely, Still” played to packed houses. Audiences were also treated to George Gallo’s (Midnight Run, Bad Boys) “Middle Men” the new Joseph Fiennes drama “Against the Current” and the 2010 Sundance Selection “Mother and Child” with the impressive cast line up including Samuel L. Jackson. But the biggest enjoyable Easter egg to pop up was “Cyrus” starring John C Reilly, Marisa Tomie and Jonah Hill. I promised the studio no review until opening day. All I’ll say, you”˜ll have to salivate while you wait!

    Most independent brethren met with enthusiastic audiences and the hopes of getting seen in other markets. In my humble opinion; two stand outs delivered the goods with enjoyable performances and engaging stories that were executed in a very creative way. These films might not have won the accolades at the festival, but they certainly provided big laughs and a good time for all. Todd Berger’s “The Scenesters” takes a comic jab at “reality” shoots that is usually reserved for horror and succeeds tremendously while the co-creative team of “Hoodwinked” presented their brand of off-the-wall humor and applied it to a very funny road trip with “Jeffie Was Here”. Both films have the luck of an extremely talented cast and crew, but “Jeffie”¦” has a slight edge with a brilliantly comic timed performance by Peter Bedgood.

    jeffie20was20here20posterIn “Jeffie Was Here” Bedgood plays Alan who has his hands full with a thankless low-paying professor job, an over-sexed teacher’s assistant, a long-suffering girlfriend, unrelenting writer’s block and a pending road trip that needs funding. Enter Jeffie, the last person one would ask to share the ride with. He’s part wannabe musician, guru, tree-hugger and general pest. But Alan has his reasons for accepting his application and the results are priceless. Bedgood brings a fine mix of frustration/sorrow/regret and hilarity that has not been seen since the early days of Jack Lemmon. There have been comparisons to Tom Hanks, but I believe Peter Bedgood as Alan gives a far more sympathetic/pathetic performance than he’s been credited for. Also, Bedgood’s chemistry works amazingly well with the other performers. He could have been the center of attention, but instead he plays with his fellow thespians so well that nearly everyone’s performance shines brighter.

    Of course, the performances have to also be credited to the talents of director Todd Edwards who does double duty as Jeffie. Edwards’s direction at times is ingeniously daffy. From Alan’s living quarters to a tough man contest at a child’s birthday party in the barrio, it’s oddball humor that comes out of left field and hits a homerun with its audience. “Jeffie”¦” is not a throw-it-all-on-the-wall comedy and see what sticks. It’s a well calculated mature piece that has some adults acting like the children they have inside of them. I also have to mention Edwards’s very capable soundtrack that had me humming long after the movie was over.

    Aside from Peter Bedgood other notables are Alexis Rabin as Amanda in a wonderful heartfelt performance and an all too brief comic burst from Vanessa Ragland. Ragland’s eccentric Chastity (the teacher’s assistant) reminds one of a young Shirley MacLaine with a touch of Sandra Bernhard. She manages to be abrasive and engaging all at once. Speaking of abrasive, Cristine Rose (NBC’s Heroes) delivers a wonderful comic turn as Alan’s mother.

    still07-bedgood-jeffiewashereThen there is the character of the title, Jeffie. Director, Todd Edwards plays him with glee; annoying, scheming with a dash of bizarre innocence that keeps us guessing what is next on his agenda or does he even have one. If I had one criticism it would be the lack of an edge on the character of Jeffie’s part. If there was the slightest bit of danger that he exuded, the film could have set it itself up as a classic. After all, Jeffie holds all the cards. But perhaps the filmmakers did not want to take that chance with the possibility of alienating some of their audience. As it stands; “Jeffie”¦” has mass appeal.

    “Jeffie Was Here” provides unusual situations with laughs and a thought-provoking, satisfying ending that hearkens back to the comedies of the 70s and early 80s. At that time writers/directors like Paul Mazursky and Paul Bartel were not just looking for basic toilet humor, they demanded the audience to think as well as laugh. Writers Todd Edwards and Peter Bedgood accomplish that right mix of pathos and fun delivering a road trip that one looks forward to taking again.

    Word-of-mouth was already making its way through the festival with nearly every screening of “The Scenesters” providing packed houses. Smart, smug and clever as hell Todd Berger takes the unusual route of creating a very funny comedy by way of crime scene footage. What successful horror films have been able to accomplish on a micro-budget under the guise of “found footage” (Blair Witch Project, Paranormal Activity), Berger traverses the unstable route of comedy and creates a funky free-for-all of comic twists and turns.

    cu_knife003_scenestersartFrom the very beginning we are treated to a couple of low budget filmmakers seeking out their break and accidently discovering a new way of making money and possibly getting creative in the long run if they manage to manipulate their subject matter as crime scene videographers. Director Todd Berger and Producer Jeff Grace play the indomitable duo with all the fixings of a great comedy team. The chemistry is hilarious and lends a goofiness that is unwelcome in the serious public servant world making the film funnier than we expected. Berger uses a courtroom as his device to tell the story where he is challenged by notable guest stars Sherilyn Fenn (Twin Peaks) as the D.A. and director John Landis as a judge. How bizarre is that?

    With all the comical vignettes strung together through the courtroom one would think the film would leave the audience with a disjointed feeling. But Berger accomplishes a seamless story that more than satisfies the viewer. The acting is all too real and the situations regarding the search for a serial killer are quirky and at times uncomfortably funny. In fact, big laughs are found in this wacky take on surveillance tapes, news reports and documentary footage almost having you lose track of who’s doing what to who and how.

    Accompanying all the hilarity is a righteous soundtrack which makes one wonder, how the heck did these guys afford it. But nothing seems to have stopped director Berger and his cast and crew, not even budget constraints. These filmmakers are as undaunted as the characters they play. They obviously went to some very creative means to get what they wanted and deliver a film that has their ingenious mark on it. This is not a standard comedy; instead it’s a hip look into a new comic mind that has something to say and prove. I encourage everyone to take the challenge and enjoy the show.