FRED Entertainment

August 27, 2004

Trailer Park: The Life Acerbic

Filed under: Columns,Trailer Park — admin @ 5:08 pm

E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES

By Christopher Stipp

August 27, 2004

45: AFTER THE SUNSET, ALFIE, SURVIVING CHRISTMAS, SWITCHBLADE ROMANCE (HAUTE TENSION), THE LIFE AQUATIC

  • 44: SPANGLISH, SHALL WE DANCE?, I HEART HUCKABEES, FINAL CUT, LAYER CAKE –> THE LIFE ACERBICBOTTLE ROCKET.

    I trace all my interest in quirky nerd cinema to BOTTLE ROCKET. I believe it was the moment when Dignan, played by Owen Wilson, was being chastised by the bigger brother of Bob Mapplethorpe. Dignan is wearing a bright orange jumpsuit, the uniform for all employees of the Lawn Wranglers landscape business, and Bob’s brother just lays into him about how gimpy he looks. You can see that Dignan really doesn’t stand up to him and there is a look in Luke Wilson’s face that just breaks with sympathy for his misguided and belittled friend. Where once, a few moments prior, Luke was telling him that he no longer wanted to have a part in low-level crime he jumps back into the fray after he listens to the exchange of insults he witnesses coming from Bob’s older brother. It’s a moment where a true moment is captured delicately enough that you believe it is happening completely.

    That whole movie is filled with moments like this and it triggered something in me that started to really demand something from me. I couldn’t be content with just passively being entertained anymore; I wanted to be engaged with the material and this movie started that. Sure, there was Altman’s SHORT CUTS a few years earlier, THE BIG BLUE (one of Besson’s finest) years earlier than that, SPINAL TAP before it, etc”¦ but BOTTLE ROCKET set off a renaissance of sorts in my renting choices. It would be some time before I was comfortable enough to go it alone at the local art house as friends demurred at the exploits of Mamet for Emmerich, but it did eventually happen. Watching BOTTLE ROCKET now is like tossing on warm slippers on a cold morning. Not everyone owns them or would take the time to put them on but those in the know enjoy the coziness. I hope THE LIFE AQUATIC is able to do what Wes Anderson’s previous three films have all done but if the trailer is any indication I am sure he has done it again.

    On the other extreme, however, if I had to pick a great runner-up that I would recommend all people check out, trailer-wise, is HAUTE TENSION. Who woulda thunk it that the French could make a movie that seems to be slapped together in the most inviting and thrilling way. It is, essentially, a slasher flick but from the previews it appears to have the same kind of vibe that harkens back to the early FRIDAY THE 13TH, HALLOWEEN, and NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET series before they started sucking.


    AFTER THE SUNSET (2004) Director: Brett Ratner
    Cast: Pierce Brosnan, Woody Harrelson, Salma Hayek, Don Cheadle, Naomie Harris
    Release: November 12, 2004
    Synopsis: Life should be easy after a sterling career as a master thief. Though he is now retired to an island paradise, trouble comes looking for Max Burdett (Pierce Brosnan) when his former nemesis from the FBI (Woody Harrelson) shows up with news of a big score rumored to be on the horizon. With a savvy local cop (Salma Hayek) also in the wings, a new cat-and-mouse game of friendship, suspicion and thievery is afoot.
    View Trailer:
    * Large (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Positively for Parents. You know, last week, when I said to do everything humanely possible, short of cattle prodding, to keep your parents from seeing SHALL WE DANCE? Yes, well, I found a suitable suitor for them to accompany them on a fun little trip through thievery lane.

    Woody Harrelson (who put the bong down long enough to put in more than a few minutes from his appearance in SHE HATE ME) looks great in the beginning moments of this trailer. In a black Chevrolet Suburban he is told that he has more protection on him than the president. We get the gist, being shown the diamond early on, that Woody is the man who is in sole possession of said carbon rock. Some hobo window washer chick walks up to the Suburban, scans the vehicle ID # with a James Bondian-like device (I have no idea why, either) and checks it in her PDA which she conveniently has open, as Woody says with all the conviction of an actor who has been trained at Julliard, “I’ve dealt with this guy before.” How very steely Stallone of you, Woody. I almost believed it.

    Sure enough, Woody is watching the escorted diamond make its way from his car to the hands of a pack of mall security guards as Pierce Brosnan looks on from above. All of a sudden the car is taken over by remote control. I don’t have any information that would lead me to understand how the VIN number and the remote operating of a bulletproof SUV have any kind of connection but Pierce looks like he’s having fun and so will your folks when they see this and that’s all that matters. Selma Hayek, stripping down from her hobo attire to reveal the crafty disguise she was wearing was enough to foil the pigs was just an act, watches Pierce as he moves the car in front of a Mac truck and lets it get T-boned. So, just like the guys in white painters outfits who just happen to be holding a piece of plate glass at just the right moment whenever a car chase is afoot, so too is the legendary Mac. Anyway, after this happens, and after we learn that Pierce is the world’s bestest, awesomeist jewel thief (from art to jewels Pierce is the probably the best-looking, not to mention heinous, simulacrum of the kinds of people who usually fill these roles in real life.). Plus, he has the hottest-looking partner in Hayek since, well, Zeta-Jones in that awful ENTRAPMENT flick. Pierce is a thief who is on his way out (it’s all about the big, final score, man) but this movie sets itself apart from previous entries into this genre.

    Believe me, the reasons why I like this trailer are not for the directing it displays. Let’s face it, the movie is not going to live or die in Brett Ratner’s hands if this film has a moderately reasonable script. However, this film is sure as hell isn’t going to get kudos for its camera work. Not in the slightest. No, the reasons why I like this trailer is that you have Harrelson who has been trying to find Brosnan for the past seven years, Brosnan is still looking for that clichéd “last score” and finds it in another diamond. Plus, you get, and this is the real reason why the movie might be interesting, Don Cheadle in the mix.

    This movie is about the successful boosting of a diamond. Pure and simple. End of story. What makes this trailer interesting, apart from the good selection of music (Blue Man Group’s “I Feel Love”), is the kinetic feel of the action at the end of this thing. Plus, I am not completely sure who ends up winning out in the end. Sometimes you can just tell that good wins out over bad in crime flicks, but with this, there really is a sense that Brosnan might, just might, live out until his retirement. Tell ma and pa this will suit them more than adequately for a matinee.


    ALFIE (2004) Director:Charles Shyer
    Cast: Jude Law, Marisa Tomei, Omar Epps, Nia Long, Jane Krakowski, Sienna Miller, Susan Sarandon
    Release:October 22, 2004
    Synopsis: A stylish reinvention of the 1960’s classic ALFIE, this film is a humorous, sexy and often touching tale of a philosophical womanizer (Jude Law) who is forced to question his seemingly carefree existence.
    View Trailer:
    * Large (Quick Time)

    Prognosis: Pompous. Smooth, smoky jazz plays slowly. The skyline of New York is in complete sunny splendor and the view of Jude Law, sputtering on his Vespa, fills the screen. “The most beautiful women reside in Manhattan.”

    As a viewer I wonder what Jamaican Red he’s been toking on I’ve personally seen better quality co-eds strolling the sidewalks of major universities all over this country. Oh well, I guess. It’s best to let the man make his case. Jude almost convinces me of his half-truths as a pair of blondes start kissing each other and then, like cold ocean water against my nether regions, I get Susan Sarandon biting on the ear hook of one of her tinted sunglasses, trying to look sexy but only evoking a slight feeling of uneasiness and discontent. I am horrified. As I try to think of something else, I try to burn the mental image with kerosene as Jude pops back up to carry my attention away.

    Law speaks right to the camera as his own narrator and that gets him some points with me as there isn’t anyone else who is trying to sell me on the movie. This trailer could really benefit from playing up all the naughty things that could happen or might happen but I realize the final product is only going to end up being like hotel porn, all the good stuff is chucked in favor of the more chick friendly PG-13 version.

    What is so confusing about this trailer is that on hand we get a hot blonde in the back of a limo, who may or may not be wearing underwear, writhing for the chance to score with Law but we also get a useless shot of Marisa Tomei (where the hell have her and her Oscar been?) and a very disturbing shot of him kissing Sarandon. Deeply. I’m horrified again. The boy is young enough to be her son and I am well too aware that her real husband is Tim Robbins. It skeeves me out.

    After he’s shown getting it on with a different hottie, Tomei and a sistah, who is supa-dupa fine, he introduces himself to the camera as Alfie. Guess what, Alfie? Who the hell cares who you are? You’re good looking, have an accent and have a way with the chicks? There isn’t a reason on God’s green earth that would make me want to see a movie about a dude who is scoring more poon than I am. Is this movie for ladies who fantasize about hooking up with a gigolo? Sorry to say but Richard Gere did this film back when Law was still learning how to tie his shoes and that fact doesn’t make me want to see this movie any quicker.

    Look, if this movie is a lot more than Law getting as much tail as he wants, you’ve lost me because there isn’t a shred of evidence to the contrary. If there is something that gives this flick a twist you need to tell me because all I see is a self-indulgent man who deserves to get VD.


    SURVIVING CHRISTMAS (2004) Director:Mike Mitchell
    Cast:Ben Affleck, James Gandolfini, Christina Applegate, Catherine O’Hara
    Release:November 12, 2004
    Synopsis:Facing another Christmas alone, Drew Latham (Affleck) decides to go back to his idyllic childhood home to spend the holidays with family. There is, however, one problem: the people living there now are not Drew’s family. Nevertheless, Drew has his mind set on an old-fashioned family Christmas, and the fact that the “family” in question, the Valcos, are complete strangers, isn’t about to put a crimp in his plans. Offering them a small fortune, Drew bribes his newfound “parents” (Gandolfini and O’Hara) to let him spend Christmas in their home, pretending to be part of the family. Just when the Valcos begin to question if any amount of money is worth being dragged all over town on such traditional family holiday excursions as Christmas shopping and the requisite choosing of the Christmas tree, their eldest daughter Alicia (Applegate) comes home for the holidays, with no intention of adopting a new “brother.”
    View Trailer:
    * Large (Quick Time)

    Prognosis: Positive. “There is a day once a year when the best of intentions can go horribly, terribly wrong.” First off, I don’t like the conceit. The timer that counts down to zero makes it seem like an entirely different movie than it is. It feels like a bomb squad is going to have to pick up pieces of our hero in Ziploc baggies but, instead, we get something else entirely different. What is the point of deception like this when you get an audience who is baited to think the trailer is going to be one thing and is switched with another? It’s not that big of a deal to me but it’s enough to warrant a little flack on my behalf. I do know, however, that mine is but a small voice as I know that Billy Bob from Alabama might think it’s a hoot that he’s, “just been done had.” Conceit or not conceit that is the question and one of truly personal taste.

    So, Ben’s character is really into Christmas. His “dad,” played by James Gandolfini, looks like the comedic equivalent of castor oil and his mother, played like Catherine O’Hara seems content with just letting things take their natural, disastrous course. The adversarial relationship that Ben and Gandolfini have looks wildly entertaining. Ben carrying the last note to an annoying conclusion in his rendition of “O, Christmas Tree” is a nice touch.

    “Surviving the fun.”

    Cue “It’s the Most Wonderful Time of the Year” song by Andy Williams as this is a Hollywood Christmas.

    A one man snowball fight is in full effect as Ben whizzes ice balls into the face of a very uncooperative younger “brother,” some cribbing going on from CHRISTMAS VACATION as the kid says he can’t feel his toes as he stands still out in a snowy yard, while Ben yells out with mirth and glee. I am unsure why the brother just stands there and I am even more unsure of why in the hell Gandolfini takes a shovel to knock Ben unconscious from behind; in front of the house no less.

    So, with that the trailer is done and we really only have three scenes here to provide some insight into what this film is all about. First glance tells me that Ben is the normal one of the “family,” albeit a little over-excited if it’s natural and not being manufactured by an array of little red, blue or purple pills mixed together on a daily basis. What’s odd is that the brother doesn’t seem to like him nor does the father. This is a severely dysfunctional family Christmas movie.

    But wait, after looking at what this movie is all about, doing some research to get a deeper plot explanation I have some reasons why everything feels so weird. I come to find that this is not Ben’s family. This is a family of strangers. Every, single, one, of, them. Ben “buys off” each one of the people inside the house because the home happens to be where he grew up and had fond memories of Christmas and in an effort to recapture the magic he gives the strangers who now reside in the place a large sum of money to let him pretend he is a part of their brood for the festivities. Obviously, now that you look at it this way, things make much better sense but it obfuscates the beginning line of the movie. We are led to believe the best of intentions going horribly wrong relates to a person trying to have their holidays go well with an estranged family they grew up with for their entire life. It only seems here that the only thing that can go horribly wrong is that the people who Affleck pays off don’t want to play back. Whatever. I’m getting all sorts of twisted in semantics but, bottom line, I like the trailer. I like it enough that I want to see this movie more than I do CHRISTMAS WITH THE KRANKS.

    Mike Mitchell, the man responsible for directing this puppy, also had his directorial fingers on DEUCE BIGALOW: MALE GIGOLO. The writers on this thing, in contrast, have been involved with CAN’T HARDLY WAIT and JOSIE AND THE PUSSYCATS. Also, we have support writing from a couple of people who have done work on That 70’s Show, The Simpson’s, and Murphy Brown. A total of 4 writers are credited. How this affects the final product is yet to be seen but take it for what it’s worth. In my opinion, though, Ben looks funny enough, O’Hara is like a great ball player who always comes through and Gandolfini is really good at playing tough guys with hearts made of stone.


    HAUTE TENSION or SWITCHBLADE ROMANCE (2003) Director: Peter Hyams
    Cast: Cécile De France, Maïwenn Le Besco, Philippe Nahon, Franck Khalfoun, Andrei Finti
    Release: Fall, 2004
    Synopsis: Two female students, Marie and Alex, set off to Alex’s parent’s secluded homestead in the country to relax and study. Come nightfall, Hell pulls up at the front door. Alex is now bound and gagged, taken off, with Marie eluding the intruder. Can she save her friend’s life in time? Or is everything all that it seems….
    View Trailer:
    * Large (Quick Time)

    Prognosis: Insanely Positive.

    The trailer starts with a couple of chicks from Europe, and I know it’s Europe not only because of their silly accents but because they’re driving a hatchback P.O.S. and listening to crappy European pop music, who are out driving and are making their way to a small house in the country where they arrive in the early evening. It’s a house owned, if my European is still up-to-date, by one of the girls’ parents. They trade bonjours, niceties and eventually bid bonsoir to one another by calling it a night. One of the girls cannot sleep as she lay awake in her bed, staring at the ceiling. Crickets chip their chirps as the sounds of night consume the air. Then, out of nowhere in particular, a car rolls right up to the front door with its high beams on. Since you know it’s not Publishers Clearinghouse delivering an oversized check and balloon bouquet you get the inkling something very bad is going to happen here. Any set of screeching tires that you hear in a trailer, that don’t involve swerving to avoid woodland creatures, wherever you may be, will tell you that it’s going to be a long night.

    Sure as a busted clock is tells the right time at least twice a day, the guy who pulled up just earlier and is laying on the doorbell (silly Europeans and their joy buzzer sounding doorbells with their little black buttons) gets met at the door by one of the girls’ father. He opens the door, gets ready to lay into the strange guy for interrupting a great dream about fromage, or whatever the hell it is people in Europe dream about, instead gets stabbed. Awesome! Not since the classic FRIDAY THE 13TH movies (the ones before parts 6 and excluding all the others including the current incarnation of pop-culture friendly Jason) has a crazed psychopath ever looked so menacing, dangerous or exciting to watch.

    The trailer continues very subtly and holds a good grip on the level of fear it evokes as the killer moves from the front door slowly, as all good killers do, and moves up the stairs to the bedroom. I am already jumping out of my own head as we get a shot of a woman, I’m not sure who as we’re only shown her eyes behind the slats of a closet door that quickly becomes blood spattered closet doors, who is tied up and gagged while the maniac looks for fresh kills inside the house. There is particularly effective moment, and one that makes me want to see this movie without seeing anything more, where the killer opens a bedroom door; those Europeans and their hard doorknobs make for great squeaky noises that just amp up the excitability level. He walks across the floor, again he’s crazy so he has to walk slowly, as one of the girl’s is under the bed with her hands pressed hard against her mouth as she quivers in pure fright. The killer pulls back the mattress and it’s off to another clip.

    By the end of this thing I am pretty sure that one of the girls becomes crazed herself as she fights back but not before she is shown running away, driving away with blood splashed everywhere and her mouth ajar in abject horror. This is an achievement begging to be seen.


    THE LIFE AQUATIC (2004) Director: Wes Anderson
    Cast:Bill Murray, Owen Wilson, Cate Blanchett, Anjelica Huston, Willem Dafoe, Jeff Goldblum, Michael Gambon
    Release: December 10, 2004 (limited)
    Synopsis: THE LIFE AQUATIC follows the relationship of a famous oceanographer (Murray) and his estranged son (Wilson), while they and the father’s motley crew embark on a series of wild adventures.
    View Trailer:
    * LARGE (Quick Time)

    Prognosis: Positive. Bill Murray stands on his boat, looking dashingly equipped to take on the ocean in his aqua colored wetsuit. As Cate Blanchett interviews him with what looks like a reel-to-reel slapped on her hip Murray one-ups Cousteau’s walkie-talkie integration into the helmets of his divers by showing off the much more useful, and sheik, rabbit ears that pipes music into the helmets. The extended pop interlude as Murray shakes a little bit of his groove thing is amusing if not hypnotically enthralling.

    Willem Dafoe narrates the trailer as he introduces us to the Belafonte, the ship that carries Murray’s crew on their oceanic adventures. As Dafoe talks we get extended clips of the people Murray surrounds himself with and, per Anderson’s vision, they each have their own unique quirks that make them all individuals. Not only is the crew unconventional but their exploits as scientists take a back seat to their adventuresome attitudes and their loyalty to Steve Zissou is readily apparent.

    What is also interesting to note is the use of CGI in this trailer. The odd and unique creatures that Murray seems credited for capturing are on full display in this trailer with the squid-like cephalopod and a delicately colored gecko-like reptile scurry about. The CGI is entirely germane for a man who was always on the hunt for one-of-a-kind organisms and it sets up wonderfully for what happens next.

    “But there remains one form of life about which captain Zissou knows very little.”

    There is a shot, a third of the way into the trailer, where we are in a large opera hall. We see Owen Wilson off in the distance but the camera rushes in a way that seems to be an Anderson watermark. Wilson, who looks like he’s back into familiar territory with this role, is Murray’s estranged son who has finally made the choice to spend some time with his father. Before things veer too far into sentimentalist bullcrap Wes’ name appears as the man behind the lens, we get some bitchin’ music, and immediately we get Murray asking his son to be a part of Team Zissou. From here, the ride through this trailer is like coasting down a hill with the pedals revolving at an all too fast a revolution as your legs are spread, outstretched. It’s just enjoyable.

    “”¦In ten days I am going to set out to find the shark that ate my friend and destroy it.”

    The idea is preposterous. How can they find one damn shark in the ocean that may or may not be the one responsible for the consumption of one man? It’s ludicrous and I completely agree with the reporter at the press conference that Murray has to explain his latest adventure. The interviewer asks, “What would be the scientific purpose of killing it?” Murray quickly and astutely gives the answer that seems most natural, almost reeling that the man doesn’t see that it’s so simple: “Revenge.”

    The team jaunts off to find its prey as this trailer just tosses you in every which direction. We get a laugh from Dafoe when he gets butt-hurt that Murray doesn’t pick him to be on a team that is to split up, like a ragtag crew of commandos, as they hunt down their elusive shark. In addition to the giggles and wonderment of Anderson’s vision we also get a nice big explosion, some great cinematography and a moment between Wilson and Murray that really drives the point home of how a father and son can reconnect, even if its Murray’s fist, after a long absence apart.

    The last quarter of this trailer deserves some love as well for its use of music to create a specific mood and how the large lettered introductions for each of the principal actors is simply appropriate in a way that would be obnoxious in any other setting. We even get a small exchange of words between Murray and Wilson that scores some points for creating some sense of comedic interplay between these two men, but, as you can find out for yourself, you can be the judge of whether you think it’s played for a quick and easy laugh.

    The trailer isn’t so much frenetic as it is multi-layered and dense. If it was anyone else who did this I am sure I would feel just as enthusiastic as I do now. This looks like another Anderson movie in the vein of his usual style but I know some deride his use of specificity in his films as if its visual herpes that needs to be inoculated against. Some point to his extreme attention to detail and make snide comments about his abilities as a filmmaker. To those I say a pox on your loins, good sirs! You know you’ve got to be one lazy asshole if someone wants to pick on a guy who just happens to not overlook anything and literally creates an entire whole world that is enveloped by his dialogue and point of view.

    If I have any feelings of apprehension about this film it has to be the CGI animals. They look a little strange, true, but, like I said, if this movie is about how he was the only man to capture these creatures then it’s necessary to the film. Since this movie doesn’t come out for another four months or so I’d say this is a more than adequate, generous trailer that captures a very unique voice.

  • August 20, 2004

    Trailer Park: Films and Glasnost

    Filed under: Columns,Trailer Park — admin @ 5:07 pm

    E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES

    By Christopher Stipp

    August 20, 2004

    44: SPANGLISH, SHALL WE DANCE?, I HEART HUCKABEES, FINAL CUT, LAYER CAKE –> FILMS AND GLASNOST

    This was a very good week for trailers.

    Sometimes the best part of this gig is finding trailers for films I would have never known about had I not been trolling the Internet looking for five discussion-worthy trailers a week. I’ve seen films from our Nordic brothers to the north, our Chinese buddies to the east and, once again, our neighbors across the pond, England. It’s a shame, really, that swapping films back and forth is as difficult as it is. Sure, most of what those snaggletooth Brits make is complete shite but what of the films that quietly explode in the theaters, an art house film that’s really engaging, that will never make it over here to play in front of a wide audience. As Asian cinema enthusiasts already know, there is a veritable Bizzaro world out there of movies that could simply keep you occupied and satisfied in between your time at the local megaplex. People have to resort to all-region players or modifying their DVD players just to be able and watch the films they’ve had to import or buy online.

    The point is that it’s discouraging and difficult to understand why it’s so hard to indulge in the moviemaking abilities of other continents. We have no problem exporting Hillary Duff into the four corners of the world, Creed was allowed to infect the globe with their crap rock, and even great books get translated for the world to read. I understand there are legal issues, copyright, blah blah blah. This is really a limp excuse to offer up and I encourage all of you, who already import films, to keep fighting the good fight. With movies like HERO and the UK crime caper, LAYER CAKE, which I review below as the trailer of the week, these are two good reasons why cinematic isolationism for films does a disservice to the rest of the world.


    SPANGLISH (2004) Director:James L. Brooks
    Cast: Cecilia Suárez, Allen Covert, Anne Bancroft, Téa Leoni, Adam Sandler, Paz Vega
    Release: December 17, 2004.
    Synopsis: Flor (Paz Vega) emigrates to Los Angeles from Mexico in hopes of finding a better life for she and her daughter, Cristina (Victoria Luna). Hired by John and Deborah Clasky (Adam Sandler and Tea Leoni) to help out in their home, Flor contends with the language barrier, Cristina’s budding femininity, and the eccentric Clasky way of life.
    View Trailer:
    * Medium (Quick Time, Windows Media)

    Prognosis: Almost Positive. This is a long trailer.

    Clocking in at over three minutes, even if you’re a die-hard Sandler fan, this almost qualifies as a sneak peak.

    What you have going on here in this trailer is that it suffers slightly from multiple personality disorder. It wants, I believe, to be a straight rom-com but then there are some serious elements that don’t feel funny enough and it almost veers into drama territory, almost going head on into chick flick territory.

    Téa Leoni, looking like an actress selected from the over-emotional section of the Stock Character supermarket, begins this trailer with a lovely, and heated, chat with Cloris Leachman, a woman who never really captured the joie de vie the same way Ms. Garrett did on Facts of Life. This conversation turns into a mother/daughter bitch session that feels lifted from a bad TV show. After we leave these two, quickly, James L. Brooks’ name is carted out and mentioned as the man who directs this jive turkey; it even drops his Academy Award for back-up if you’re not already impressed he has an L in the middle of his name, and it even gives two more of his films just to be sure. Sandler fans, you must realize, are not the swiftest amoebas in the bunch. Now, after this, we get our hero: Sandler.

    Say what you want about this goofy dope, the man makes more money than many of us in this room, but I genuinely like it when he’s not being, well, his cranked-up fraternity persona. I didn’t like BILLY MADISON. I didn’t care for LITTLE NICKY. However, I do appreciate the man’s stab at honest film, if you can call it that, in PUNCH DRUNK LOVE and BIG DADDY. The former I believe sank like a stone in its 3rd act and the latter I appreciated all the way through. Here, in this trailer, though, there is a good blend. From the initial impression you get with the way he deals with his kids to his neurotic self-speak as he weighs the pros and cons of what critical stars will mean to him, there is something likeable about this guy.

    Téa Leoni comes back into the mix, carrying her own neuroticisms for the world to see like medals pinned on a 4-star general, and it’s severely distracting. There is an odd sub-plot of her dealing with whatever crap is affecting her ability to be a parent as she somehow comes to terms with her own mother who seems to enjoy the antagonistic relationship they have. And then, to just “mix things up” we get a woman who doesn’t speak any English but looks like the kind of woman dudes everywhere start penning the words “I didn’t think it could happen to me”¦.” as soon she enters the room. She seems to be the assistant who is going to help around the house and, eventually, transcend language to teach us all the meaning of true love. It’s downright preciously clichéd, but we’ll deal with it for now.

    At that point in the trailer things get weird.

    The next scene has Téa giving her girl a coat that doesn’t fit. The daughter starts to cry when Téa mentions that it’ll fit better when she loses a few pounds. Sandler sounds like he’s talking through a snot induced blubber session as he’s comforts his little brood. Now, cut to the wacky maid who doesn’t know how to work an electric seat in an automobile as her chair starts to move forward and her eyes get wide in concern. Huh? Is this PLANES, TRAINS AND AUTOMOBILES or is this a drama?

    The rest of the trailer then shifts to emotional mode as the maid is being told, by Sandler, the ABC’s of parenting whilst Téa is in a full-blown Meg Ryan cry-a-thon with the blubbery eyes to prove it as her mother sits at her side not seeming to give a care that her daughter is having a meltdown of Chernobyl proportions.

    Oh yeah, the maid painstakingly fixes the problem with Sandler’s daughter’s coat: she uses a sewing machine to let it out. The maid is a hero! It simply devolves from here in one long music video as our players randomly bounce off one another. I’m almost annoyed by the end, feeling confused as to what the hell is happening here, but I am sure before the movie comes out the PR machine will decide on a direction and it’ll get marketed that way without looking back.


    SHALL WE DANCE? (2004) Director: Peter Chelsom
    Cast: Richard Gere, Jennifer Lopez, Susan Sarandon, Stanley Tucci, Nick Cannon, Richard Jenkins, Mya, Deborah Yates
    Release: October 15, 2004
    Synopsis: An accountant grows increasingly bored with his life and spying a beautiful dance teacher, decides to take some lessons to spice up his life. As the lessons progress, he finds himself falling further and further in love with the joy of dancing.
    View Trailer:
    * Medium (Quick Time)

    Prognosis: Negative. One of the questions I get asked most infrequently is: “Chris, what about my parents? It’s been a while with all the tent poles in the Cineplex this summer that it has looked like Barnum and Bailey for the past three months. What can I recommend to ma and pa?”

    Well, there will be lots to choose from in a good month or so but, thankfully, this is one you can save your parents, especially your dad, from having to sit through.

    I can only imagine the pitch for this film had something to do with the fact that since Gere was so lauded for his dancing in CHICAGO, and rightfully so, there had to be some vehicle out there that would let him showcase it even more. Plot be dammed!

    It’s nearly painful to explain what’s going on in this movie but I’ll quickly say that if you have seen FOOTLOOSE when Chris Penn did his dancing bit for Kevin Bacon, a moment in cinematic history most guys just close their eyes tightly while watching, you come close to getting the gist of the story. Gere is wasting his life, slowly, as a family guy with no life. He seems frustrated with himself, his job and his lot in life. So sad is our handsome hero that he decides to take up ballroom dance lessons with Jennifer Lopez to help mitigate his funk. He signs up and, as a ploy to get young men everywhere exploding through their Levi’s, there is some lesbian innuendo in this trailer as Lopez describes, slowly, the intricacies of having and being a good dance partner. Then, pretty much, the trailer just grabs any mediocre joke it can find lying around to make people think they need to see this film. Almost like monkeys flinging poo, but not nearly as funny, this trailer is just aching to hit something.

    Gere, during his life affirming dance transformation, starts to practice his dance steps at work while seated at his desk, he steps on Lopez’s toes just to show far he needs to go by the end to be the perfect dancer, a Tina Turner private dancer for his wife, and there are even some obnoxious professional dancers that some ladies will get a hoot or two out of seeing because they are so darn silly; yeah, I know, this is real good stuff to get “˜em clamoring to get through the front door. There is the requisite moment when Gere tells his old lady that he’s really been dancing when he said he’s been doing X or Y and he really didn’t want to tell her because she just “wouldn’t understand” and won’t she please let him dance for her to show how much love they really, really have?

    As a topper, the voiceover says this is movie is a “story about the dreams we follow.” I’ll give you a little dime store Dr. Phil advice: If you’re living a sad life out there and secretly want to go ballroom dancing and really want to take some lessons, take the frigging lessons and get yourself a better dream than that. Really. I’m not saying I understand what makes someone hide their desire to get on a dance floor and two-step but I can tell you with an ounce of certitude that everyone here can come up with something a lot more fulfilling than dance.

    Tell your parents they can save their money and go see TEAM AMERICA that same weekend. They’ll definitely won’t like that either but it’s a far better fate than this flick.


    I HEART HUCKABEES (2004) Director: David O. Russell
    Cast: Dustin Hoffman, Isabelle Huppert, Jude Law, Jason Schwartzman, Lily Tomlin, Mark Wahlberg, Naomi Watts
    Release: October 1, 2004
    Synopsis: Albert Markovski (Jason Schwartzman), head of the Open Spaces Coalition, has been experiencing an alarming series of coincidences the meaning of which escapes him. With the help of two Existential Detectives, Bernard and Vivian Jaffe (Dustin Hoffman and Lily Tomlin), Albert examines his life, his relationships, and his conflict with Brad Stand (Jude Law), an executive climbing the corporate ladder at Huckabees, a popular chain of retail superstores. When Brad also hires the detectives, they dig deep into his seemingly perfect life and his relationship with his spokesmodel girlfriend, the voice of Huckabees, Dawn Campbell (Naomi Watts). Albert pairs up with rebel firefighter Tommy Corn (Mark Wahlberg) to take matters into their own hands under the guidance of the Jaffes’ nemesis, the French radical Caterine Vauban (Isabelle Huppert).
    View Trailer:
    * Large (Quicktime)

    Prognosis: Positive. The last time I looked at this movie the teaser had no footage and was nothing more than Naomi Watts cavorting around in a flashy Uncle Sam dance number that would’ve made any American proud.

    Now, in this trailer, we get some idea what this movie is all about.

    At the outset we have Lily Tomlin asking Jason Schwartzman if he’s ever transcended space and time. Such a heady thing to be asking so early on in a trailer that should be about grabbing instead of being philosophically challenging but Jason wryly answers that he’s transcended time, but not space. He then cops to not knowing what the hell she’s talking about. You won’t be able to make out what’s happening either as we cut to Marky “C’mon C’mon” Mark himself getting slammed in the head with a large rubber ball by Schwartzman.

    This is not your average film. In fact, this film seems to be a movie about existential detectives. Being able to spy on people through mental projection seems like an odd notion to try an accept when not couched in a land of superhero films but before you can question any of this Jude Law is nearly wiping the floor with Schwartzman while our friend Marky is screaming at someone in a boardroom to shut up. Marky does it over and Over. Really loud, too.

    Dustin Hoffman even pops up wearing a hair helmet the Beatles would’ve been sporting had they existed this long as he tells our friend Marky about how everything in the universe is connected. There is no context, nothing to compare it to in the film. I almost want to say things in this trailer “just are” but then I would be guilty of the wonderfully resonant non sequiturs that are tossed like cherry bombs in this trailer.

    Naomi Watts pops up, lover of all things Jude Law, telling us of her eight minutes of sexual heaven that she shares with Jude on a consistent basis. As if to defend the short span of time she immediately feels somehow denigrates her husband’s virility she’s absolutely endearing as she spouts, “It’s not quality, it’s quantity.” I can get behind that notion.

    Marky has a wonderful comeback as someone mentions at a table he’s sitting at that Jesus is never mad with us if we live with him in our hearts: “I hate to break it to you but he is. He most definitely is.”

    In the remaining cut scenes we get Marky, in full fireman regalia, saving a smoky Naomi from a certain crispy doom, Marky for some reason shoves Law to the floor, Naomi stars in another “commercial” for Huckabee’s in a very skimpy turquoise number, some people are dancing and there’s even Polaroid’s being popped off like fireworks. Man, is this an odd looking film and I am glad that, come the first of October, we’ll see what the man who brought us THREE KINGS and FLIRTING WITH DISATER has crafted this time.


    FINAL CUT (2004) Director: Omar Naïm
    Cast: Robin Williams, Mira Sorvino, Jim Caviezel, Mimi Kuzyk, Stephanie Romanov, Thom Bishops
    Release: September 3, 2004 (limited)
    Synopsis: A Zoë Chip is chip placed in your brain at birth to record your entire life. When you die, the footage from your life is edited into a “Rememory”– a film shown at your funeral pieced together by an editor. A toy for the privileged, Zoë Chips are changing the face of human interaction, but there are those who are against this emerging technology, and believe that memories are meant to fade.
    Alan Hackman (Robin Williams) is the best “cutter” in the business, his ability to grant the corrupt absolution of the sins of his clients, has put him in high demand. However, his talent for viewing life without emotion has shaped him into a cold distant man and has made him unable to experience life in the first person. He believes he is a “sin eater” and his work provides him with the ability to absolve the dead of their sins. While cutting a Rememory for a high-powered colleague, Alan discovers an image from his childhood that has haunted him his entire life. This discovery leads him on a high intensity search for truth and redemption.

    View Trailer:
    * Medium (Windows Media)

    Prognosis: Positive. Robin Williams talks about implants.

    Obviously, no, he’s not talking about the kind of implants you’re envisioning in your head right now but this is a microchip of sorts that, when imbedded, gives immortality to an individual simply by being able to preserve everything that you see and hear. These experiences can then be enjoyed by future generations for eons to come by transferring the stored information and pared down to make a “life movie” of sorts.

    Robin sits at an editing console and watches these very same lives unfold before him. He seems to have liked the product so much he bought the company and is the man in charge of the operation. Mira Sorvino, who really needs to be in front of the camera more often than she’s been, asks Robin what it’s like to see these lives being lived. Good question and it’s enough to garner a little more curiosity.

    There’s an annoying H.A.L.-like computer that tells not only Robin, but the audience as well, what footage he’s about to look at, but it really just sounds like a woman doing her best to sound like a computer for the purposes of this movie. One of the “lives” Robin watches, cuts, and molds into a video product for a family to keep hides a secret. As throaty voiceover guy says, it’s a secret, “worth killing for.” Really, now?

    Jesus himself, Jim Caviezel, is very un-holy as it appears he wants Robin to find the answer to the question worth killing for as he displays a little aggression. There is a lot of ambiguousness involved in trying to understand what Jim wants out of Robin, why Robin does what he does for the people left behind as he essentially “edits” their lives, and exactly what is that secret worth killing for.

    At the end of this thing there is an off-screen conversation with Robin and a little girl. She says, “Are you going to fix what my daddy can remember?” Robin replies, “He’ll forget. We’ll make sure you don’t.” I swear on all that’s holy that I feel like Kareem Abdul-Jabbar in AIRPLANE saying “Huh?” over and over again trying to pick apart what Confucius here is talking about and what seems to be a cosmically cryptic riddle surrounding everything else.

    While slightly obfuscating, which is better, believe it or not, than revealing everything, this film has some solid promise of being an entertaining piece of sci-fi. Omar Naim not only wrote but directed this movie; as a first time director of something this big, however, it will be interesting to see if there is promise of a burgeoning career.


    LAYER CAKE (2002) Director: Matthew Vaughn
    Cast: Daniel Craig, Kenneth Cranham, Dexter Fletcher, Jamie Foreman, Michael Gambon, Burn Gorman, Tom Hardy, Tamer Hassan, Sally Hawkins, Darren Healy, Nathalie Lunghi, Colm Meaney, Sienna Miller, James O’Donnell, Peter Rnic, Garry Tubbs
    Release: October 1, 2004 (UK)
    Synopsis: Based upon JJ Connelly’s London crime novel, “LAYER CAKE” is about a successful cocaine dealer (DANIEL CRAIG) who has earned a respected place among England’s Mafia elite and plans an early retirement from the business. However, big boss Jimmy Price hands down a tough assignment: find Charlotte Ryder, the missing rich princess daughter of Jimmy’s old pal Edward, a powerful construction business player and gossip papers socialite. Complicating matters are two million pounds’ worth of Grade A ecstasy, a brutal neo-Nazi sect and a whole series of double crossings. The title “LAYER CAKE” refers to the layers or levels the dealer has to go through as he painstakingly plots his own escape. What is revealed is a modern underworld where the rules have changed. There are no ‘codes’, or ‘families’ and respect lasts as long as a line. Not knowing who he can trust, he has to use all his ‘savvy’, ‘telling’ and skills which make him one of the best, to escape his own. The ultimate last job, a love interest called Tammy and an international drugs ring, threaten to draw him back into the ‘cake mix’. But, time is running out and the penalty will endure a lifetime.
    View Trailer:
    * Medium (Windows Media)

    Prognosis: Positive. Now this is what a trailer for a crime flick should look like.

    Whilst I believe this is one of the best trailers I have seen come out in the past week, the trailer got me hungry for something sweet; this feeling, however, was most likely instigated by Sienna Miller but more on that in a moment.

    What we have, initially, is a dude (some of you Brits in the audience can help me if the man in question is a low-grade celebrity of some kind) who apes the affections of someone giving a cooking demonstration. His real name is Marco Pierre-White and I have no clue what the hell he’s there for nor do I know if he’s playing himself, but damn if he isn’t funny as a straight talking chap who mixes some banal tonality with images that are superb representatives of the formula this movie follows. The tam-tam music that leads into the pastel cooking segment is a nice touch.

    “First, you need a good egg.” Daniel Craig with his dusty blonde hair and apparent muscular masculinity is quickly introduced as our hero. I haven’t ever seen him in anything substantial here in the States that I am aware of but it’s good to see a fresh face.

    “Toss in a handful of villains.” This is where we get to see our hero’s antagonists. Colm Meaney makes his tougher than leather presence known in this film as well and he is situated clearly on the other side of the law. This is Colm’s second inclusion into this column as his other movie, INTERMISSION, was a comedic crime film that played earlier this year to really good reviews so it’s nice to have someone of his stature, even if many in America wouldn’t be able to pick him out from a crowd of Ooompa Loompas. The man simply can go either way with his roles as a good/bad guy.

    “And one large portion”¦.”

    Before I can register what our man Friday is saying we get our first glimpse of Sienna Miller. What is just a simple look at her shaking her groove thang on a dance floor turns into a comment from our narrator who says we should add a double portion of the lovely lady and boy do we ever get a heaping spoonful. We get some thigh, a perverted gander at her bra, garter, and a lingering look at her chest as she squeezes her lovelies for all the world to see. It’s sheer wonderment and should be the one good reason why you check out this trailer.

    “And top it off with a liberal sprinkling of mindless freedom of expression.”

    Here’s where the other money shots go on display. We get to see some fighting, some drugs, representative samples of the cinematography, large stacks of cash, Colm slamming the head of some poor young fellow into a cadaver, some chick smoking crack, cops with powerful guns, Sienna walking aimlessly around in her unmentionables, some dude and chick going at it (insert your own Beavis exclamation of disbelief), and some lines of coke being snorted with it all being played against a techno beat.

    “Stir aggressively.”

    The violence is just upped from our previous set of clips with a lot of visual images of people getting their asses handed to them with the blood to match and it is all a lot more than any self-censoring theater chain would ever allow to be shown before CONFESSIONS OF A TEENAGE DRAMA QUEEN.

    Simply put, this is an actioneer from across the pond that just doesn’t get made that frequently anymore in today’s Hollywood system. No matter, though, as the Brits seemed to have put one together that samples from men’s most favorite things (drugs, chicks, dumb violence and a little promise of nudity) and put it all into a package that doesn’t even come close to feeling like it was pieced together by a B-movie squad. I didn’t think proper Englishmen had it in them to be so violent but this movie is definitely on the must see list when and if it ever descends on America’s cinematic shores.

    August 13, 2004

    Trailer Park: This Column Has No Name

    Filed under: Columns,Trailer Park — admin @ 5:06 pm

    E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES

    By Christopher Stipp

    August 13, 2004

    THIS COLUMN HAS NO NAME

    Another week goes by in August and I just happened to find the new trailer for HERO. Some of you may have already had a small taste of it on the television (it’s always good to get exposure of any kind) but I have found a different trailer than the one that’s been making the rounds since March at the official site. Big ups need go out to Quentin Tarantino who probably saved this movie from becoming an obscure blip that would have been detained in the Miramax vaults for who knows how much longer. On top of that, and from what I’ve read, the film is going to get a decent distribution. Instead of a limited release, which is usually par for most courses that these kinds of movies play on, the film is gong to wide on August 27th. Of course, much like the ballyhooed STAR WARS trilogy that will be coming to a marketplace near you next month, people have already sought out the original and have been enjoying the bootlegs and unofficial/official region-free versions of the movie for quite a while but it should be stressed that a movie that takes great pains to develop a sense of place through knockdown visuals should be felt in a theater seat as it plays out on the big screen.

    Much like I mentioned about GARDEN STATE last week, there is some movement in the old bones of these late summer flicks and they demand some love. I’ve come armed this week with more than enough evidence that points to the black hole some of these movies need to be jettisoned into, but there is simply good films still making their muted voice heard this time of the year.

    Let me know what you think of HERO. I would hate to think I’ve been talking this movie up just to have it implode like a train wreck.


    OUTFOXED: RUPERT MURDOCH’S WAR ON JOURNALISM (2004) Director: Robert Greenwald
    Cast:Douglas Cheek, Walter Cronkite
    Release: July 16, 2004 (New York, California), Available for purchase on DVD at official site.
    Synopsis: Documentary on reported Conservative bias of the Rupert Murdoch-owned Fox News Channel (FNC), which promotes itself as “Fair and Balanced”. Material includes interviews with former FNC employees and the inter-office memos they provided.
    View Trailer:
    * Medium (Various)

    Prognosis: Positive. “Their methods are outlandish.”

    Bill O’Reilley squeals out loud to cut someone’s mic. Geraldo Rivera and Sean Hannity talk over those who are either defending their points or are making one.

    “Their technique is outstanding.”

    We get a handful of the very same people, and some new faces to being the point home to make sure everyone knows, saying the word “flip-flop” in regard to John Kerry and, at one point, there is a picture of the comfortable footwear under his picture as a newscaster makes sure you see how absurd Kerry’s voting record really is.

    “Their news is outrageous.” What comes next in this trailer is probably the funniest sound bite used against someone I have ever heard. The same man who mistakenly used the word “blow-job” in the same sentence as he tried to use the word “curb-job,” which has used for many miles on the bumpers for Howard Stern’s radio program, Shepard Smith, is quoted saying that the reason a city cannot attract more minorities to be police officers is because, “black guys are afraid of water.” Now, I’m no dummy. I watch MTV. I saw that one episode of Cribs where Trick Daddy, himself a black man, jumped into a pool not even wearing any safety devices and got out, his biznitches all huddled around him and his dong all outlined in a very graphic and disturbing sort of way behind his boxers, and he didn’t have a problem with the water.

    Quickly after the minority comment, we get another Fox dude, Brian Kilmeade, who says that North Korea loves John Kerry. I must have missed that newsflash. I am usually up on Kim Jong-Il’s thoughts on nuclear weapons, plutonium fuel reactors, and what he thinks about the American political race. I have to say I am slipping in my older age. If Kim likes Kerry then Kerry must be a pinko, communist sympathizer, right?

    I must come clean in admitting that the part in the trailer where it shows a zing-zang assault of John Kerry remarks, all of them personal opinion and none of them flowery or tender in nature, makes me wonder what is Fox’s deal. It only really piques my interest about what is happening at that network over there. We get Kilmeade, who seems to have an inside line on all things important, as he states that Saddam Hussein must love Jeneane Garofalo (he must as he seems to have a little more time on his hands lately to crochet and paint some color-by-numbers portraits while keeping up on far-leftist American comediennes.)

    Then we get it: a guy who appears as an interviewee makes the statement that the Fox news channel is an adjunct to the Republican party.

    Of course there’s something smelly and stinky in Denmark, my good man, Rosencrantz. I wouldn’t say, categorically, that the above remark is true, lord knows how close it could be, but this isn’t about the content of the statement but of the effectiveness of the trailer. This movie is propaganda. There should be no doubt about that. This film is going to disparage Fox News. There should be no argument about that. I enjoy a good fight and, love it or hate it, there seems to be good evidence to make a point about a network that just doesn’t feel fair and balanced.


    WICKER PARK (2004) Director: Paul McGuigan
    Cast: Josh Hartnett, Matthew Lillard, Rose Byrne, Diane Kruger
    Release: September 3, 2004
    Synopsis: Intricately moving back and forth in time and revealing the story from each character?s perspective, Wicker Park is an intense psychological drama about a man (John Hartnett) caught in an obsessive search for a woman he fell deeply in love with – a woman who then vanished without a trace. Two years after her disappearance, he catches a fleeting glimpse of her in a local bar and begins a twisting search to find her and discover what really happened.
    View Trailer:
    * Large (Quick Time)

    Prognosis: Negative. I had a bit of renewed interest in Josh Hartnett after seeing his performance in the mini-clip that Robert Rodriquez showed at the Comic-Con for SIN CITY. Josh encapsulated the slow talking, deeply affected hit man that rang perfectly with Frank Miller’s envisioning of a hard-boiled town run by heavy violence. I wanted to go back and see if some of what Josh showed on that screen was somehow transmuted to his performance here as someone who lost a woman without a trace and then thinks he finds her after a two year lapse and then obsesses about it.

    Yeah, it’s disposable.

    The trailer starts off good enough. We find out first that the girl Josh likes is a dancer (as does seemingly every onscreen girlfriend; I’ve yet to find one who has to work the graveyard at Winchell’s.) There are some slight glimpses that the camera work here is just slightly better than your average young adult drama and there are even some shots of good lovin’ between the blonde and Josh. If this was it, I’d say this was a first for the young man who has so far only proven to me he can cry real well on cue and can get down with his bombastic self in PEARL HARBOR. Although, I am not entirely biased against the young man as he showed stellar moves in BLACK HAWK DOWN which, if you all want to know, was a true testament to acting he hasn’t yet duplicated; it wasn’t just a fluke, I know it, but what comes next in this film just shows the kind of crap he’s signing on for.

    So, when we last left our lovers in the sack, they were pledging undying affection for one another. How do we make this story movie worthy? By adding a whacked out, crazy bitch into the mix, that’s how. It seems that there is an interloper who wishes to horn in on Hartnett’s happiness and somehow, through a series of events and a couple of years of distance, this crazy woman claims to be the same chick that Josh lost the first go around by mimicking the lifestyle of the lost woman in question. She wears the same clothes, has the same perfume, uses the same Pearl Tampax, etc… At one point a sleeping Hartnett wakes up, startled, by this chick who is sitting on his bed. He asks what the hell she is doing. The woman says, “Watching you sleep.” Dudes of all nations, if a woman you really don’t know well looks crazy, sounds a little crazy and tells you that she has been watching you sleep after you think it’s awesome you get to bust a nut and then have a little sleepover? Knock that chick in the head with any available travel alarm clock and make a line for the door.

    Oh yeah, I almost forgot to mention, I already know the punch line to this: I’ve seen this movie years ago except it was called SINGLE WHITE FEMALE. I didn’t like it then and sure as anything I’ve seen this year this doesn’t look any better reheated with some plot differences to keep the lawyers at bay.

    The rest of this trailer is forgettable, unfortunately, as I was really pulling for Hartnett. He has great potential if she sheds that pretty boy pin up allure and sticks to something with a little more substance than sub-par thrillers.


    WITHOUT A PADDLE (2004) Director: Steven Brill
    Cast: Seth Green, Matthew Lillard, Dax Shepard, Abraham Benrubi, Rachel Blanchard
    Release: August 20th, 2004
    Synopsis: Three young guys go into the Oregon wilderness in search of lost treasure. They take a canoe upriver and everything that can go wrong does go wrong. Hunted by two backwoods farmers, they encounter death-defying rapids, tree-hugging hippie chicks and a crazy old mountain man played by Burt Reynolds.
    View Trailer:
    * Medium (Windows Media)

    Prognosis: Negative. I wasn’t really going to touch this one, but I’ve seen previews starting to get heavy airplay and figured I’d give it the old once-over.

    What we have here, in the tradition of great floating-down-the-stream-in-a-boat-with-a-bunch-of-dudes comedies like 1984’s UP THE CREEK (a true testament to shoddy moviemaking that makes for great late night movie watching), is something that doesn’t defy words. There are many, in fact, that describe the overall impression one gets after watching this trailer; none of them, however, have anything to do with “great,” “anticipatory” or even “desirable.”

    What we have in the opening scenes of this trailer is the set-up: three childhood friends, all kind of oddball in their own cinematic way, take a trip on the water together. We have Lillard, who can’t commit to a hot girlfriend, Green, who looks like a neurotic hypochondriac, and Sheppard, who plays the best cliché of them all, the guy who basically doesn’t give two figs about anything, or anyone, just as long as he gets his. In fact, one of the few opening moments into Dax’s character exposition, as he responds to a police officer’s question if any of them were boy scouts, he says, “no, but I had a brownie once.” Zing! What a dude. Dax is then shown offering emotional support to Green, after they all fall out of their canoe and have to make their way to the head of the river up 20+ miles in the direction they came from, but stops everything as he finds, and acknowledges with great aplomb, a floating can of beer in the water. My sides still hurt from that laugh grenade.

    What other kinds of gags can you look forward to seeing?

    Well, there is a small enclave of forest women in the movie who ensure our men don’t go without a little possibility of getting their libidos on, but wait, we find out these chicks don’t shave. Oh, oh, oh, there’s also the part where these guys are out in the middle of nowhere with only their boxers on, it’s nighttime, and it’s raining. What do these guys need to do in order to get some sleep and keep warm? Huddle up, of course, but these are real dudes and real dudes are thinking about the implications of guy-on-guy-on-guy sex overtures before giving consideration to their own self-preservation. And, since this is a comedy, they all end up doing it anyway but Dax says, “This doesn’t leave the cave.” Laughs are dropping out of my tearing eyeballs like there’s an onion shredding competition going on.

    This really does look like a mediocre comedy with only the slightest hint that it could even be worth a matinee should you find yourself in the position of having seen every other movie that is in current release and it’s a toss up between this or YU-GI-OH!, you’re on Quaaludes and really can’t think straight. Come to think of it, actually, this film when paired up to the 1984 movie referenced above, would actually make up a good night of viewing on your local UPN or WB affiliate. It could be the midnight “UP THE CREEK,” “WITHOUT A PADDLE” marathon. (This is but a glimpse into the awesome power of my creativity.)

    I’m sure you can skip this one until you can verify with your other friends, you know, the ones who aren’t as cool about movies as you are, that this is the legendary August sleeper hit of the year. I’d bet my left nipple it’s not, but as this movie is opening on a Wednesday, in August, I’m fairly confident I’m right.


    CRIMINAL (2004) Director: Gregory Jacobs
    Cast: John C. Reilly, Diego Luna, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Jonathan Tucker, Maeve Quinlan
    Release: September 10, 2004 (limited)
    Synopsis: Set in Los Angeles over the course of 24 hours, “Criminal” follows a day in the life of two small-time bunco artists who stumble upon a foolproof, and extremely lucrative, scam. The story begins in a casino when Rodrigo (DIEGO LUNA) is caught pulling a “change-for-a-hundred” swindle on two different cocktail waitresses. The escapade is witnessed by Richard Gaddis (JOHN C. REILLY) an older, more experienced con artist who intervenes. Posing as a policeman he escorts Rodrigo away. Richard explains that he is temporarily in need of a partner and invites the younger man to help him pull a few jobs. Rodrigo is suspicious, but desperate to help his father who is in serious trouble over gambling debts. He agrees to try out a partnership. The two men are taking a break from a series of “nickel and dime” schemes when Richard is summoned to the luxury hotel where his sister Valerie (MAGGIE GYLLENHAAL) who hates him for swindling her and their younger brother Michael (JONATHAN TUCKER) out of their inheritance, works as the concierge. Valerie explains that an older Spanish man named Ochoa had been making a scene in the lobby trying to see VIP guest William Hannigan (PETER MULLAN). While being escorted out, he had collapsed, but not before calling out Richard’s name and begging Valerie to call him. Incensed that Richard and his low-life friends might endanger her job, she tells her brother to make sure both he and Ochoa never set foot in the hotel again.
    As Richard and Rodrigo enter the room where the old time con man is waiting for the paramedics, they have no idea that a once in a lifetime opportunity is about to fall into their laps. Ochoa explains the sting. An expert forger, he has made a copy of an extremely rare, one-of-a-kind 1878 Monroe Silver Certificate. Due to U.S. tax concerns, Hannigan, an Irish multi-millionaire who collects antique currency, must leave the country the next day. If Richard can get to Hannigan, Ochoa knows he will not be able to resist adding the Certificate to his collection. Because lab tests would take a week, there is virtually no chance that he will discover the fraud. As the deceptions and duplicity mount, Richard and Rodrigo must negotiate a succession of swindlers, thieves and grifters to pull off the biggest caper of their lives.

    View Trailer:
    * Medium (Windows Media, Quick Time)

    Prognosis: Semi-Positive. John C. Reilly. Not quite at the same level as a Bill H. Macy but he comes about as close as one can. He has had some great parts in flicks like MAGNOLIA, CHICAGO and BOOGIE NIGHTS.

    “People fall through the cracks in life. Why does this happen? Because people don’t know what they want. I don’t have that problem.”

    It’s not too often that we get one of the stars of a film to do a voiceover for a trailer but John does a good job starting things off. He sounds more believable than throaty voiceover guy and it’s adds a layer of believability to the thing that a 3rd person wouldn’t be able to convey.

    What we see, after the vague initial introduction to Reilly, is Diego Luna; he is also starring in the Spanish language movie NICOTINA and this role requires no work on your behalf to decipher what he is saying. The man has access to two moviemaking communities: one that speaks English and one that doesn’t. Imagine the world with a bi-lingual Keanu, Diaz as a polyglot or if Gwyneth Paltrow actually made all her films in England where she could employ her fake fuc$%&# British accent she oh so loves to embrace and flaunt. The results would still be the same on all involved, to be sure, but Diego is able to work both sides of the language fence with great believability and, since this is actually a remake of an Argentinean movie called NINE QUEENS, it adds some token credibility to the production. Diego plays the part of a guy who has some money to burn by gambling it all away but Reilly wants to step in and show the kid a thing or two. Out of nowhere we are launched in the direction of Maggie Gyllenhaal, Reilly’s sister in this film, and we are introduced to the setup.

    It seems sis works for a hotel, she calls John up to tell him of a potential “job,” and she tells him of a rich Irishman that John could easily swindle. The job involves currency forgery and, through a series of misadventures, there is a sub-plot of Diego and Maggie getting together and of John trying to pull off a deal that could net him hundreds of thousands of dollars. The trailer, near the end, gets too jumbled up and I’m not quite sure what is going on. It’s slightly confusing. If this was done by design, 2 points for you Trailer Maker Person, because while I think I have a grasp on things I am thinking there is a missed opportunity to showcase a little more Reilly.

    The music behind everything is all right, the production values look minimal (as should be the case for an “indie” like this) and the very end of this trailer, in which John asks a rhetorical question (the very worst kind to ask if you’re not prepared to answer it), just leaves me feeling on the fence about how good this movie can be. I appreciate the effort, but I’m not entirely convinced of this film’s potential. I do appreciate, however, the super-hero team-up of Reilly and Diego. They look proportionately humorous and I hope this is taken advantage of in the most appropriate way possible.


    HERO (2002) Director: Zhang Yimou
    Cast:Jet Li, Tony Leung Chiu-Wai, Maggie Cheung Man-Yuk, Zhang Ziyi, Chen Dao Ming, Donnie Yen
    Release: August 27, 2004
    Synopsis: At the height of China’s Warring States period, the country was divided into seven kingdoms: Qin, Zhao, Han Wei, Yan, Chu and Qi. For years, the separate kingdoms fought ruthlessly for supremacy. As a result, the populace endured decades of death and suffering. The Kingdom of Qin was the most determined of all. The Qin King was obsessed with conquering all of China and becoming her first Emperor. He had long been the target of assassins throughout the other six states. Of all the would-be killers, none inspired as much fear as the three legendary assassins, Broken Sword, Flying Snow and Sky.
    To anyone who defeated the three assassins, the King of Qin promised great power, mountains of gold and a private audience with the King himself. But defeating the killers is a near impossible task. For ten years no one came close to claiming the prize. So when the enigmatic county sheriff, Nameless, came to the palace bearing the legendary weapons of the slain assassins, the King was impatient to hear his story. Sitting in the palace, only ten paces from the King, Nameless told his extraordinary tale: For ten years, Nameless studied the way of the sword and resolved to challenge the three assassins. Using the secrets of swordsmanship; Nameless defeated the mighty Sky in a furious showdown. Following this initial victory, he destroyed the famed duo of Flying Snow and Broken Sword. This time using a weapon far more devastating than his sword – their extraordinary love for each other.

    The King hung on every detail of this curious story. But then something most unexpected happened – the King has a different story to tell of how Nameless really came to sit there, face to face with the King! It appears that everything was not so simple. In the centre of the intrigue sits Nameless -a solitary ranger and the King of Qin – the ruler of the Kingdom, with only ten steps between them. Within those ten steps holds an earth-shattering tale of love, honour and duty, a story that moves beyond the reaches of history. A story about what it means to be a HERO. View Trailer:
    * Large (Quick Time)

    Prognosis: One of the best this year. Sometimes some extra attention should be given to those who need a little boost. With a movie like HERO, however, it doesn’t need any.

    However, seeing how I reviewed this bad boy nearly five months ago I still feel this movie has put out two good trailers now that show why having a great movie just makes the job that much easier for the guys and gals who make these trailers. There is no deception going on. There is no need to spooge all the money shots across the screen like a poorly made porno. This is unadulterated wire-fu that will turn away the foreign film readers of the world but it will reward those who just sit their butts down in the seats and give up a brisk 96 minutes (although the director’s cut gives almost an additional thirty). What makes this trailer so different than the last one?

    Well, this trailer feels more sensuous. By this I do not mean you feel burning deep within your loins but I am referring to the palpable sense of touch, taste, smell, sound and sight that you experience watching this thing.

    Quentin Tarantino is prominently given credit for presenting the film, and for good reason too as he’s been this film’s heavy hitter deep inside the bowels of Miramax, and it’s as he’s given his due that Taikos drum into the soundscape. We’re shown Jet Li, walking across a grey slate table, perched low to the ground, as he stomps his foot. A tea cup rises in the air as his sword cuts deep into bunches of stacked logs that spans the circular circumference of this very gray room. The logs fall but the tea cup ends up resting on the flat part of Li’s blade, the room not stirring save for the rumble of the tumbling lumber.

    Throaty voice over guy chimes in with his chime about Li being a warrior with no name, but, disregarding the man’s voice, what really makes this trailer cook are the arrows, deep black ones, shot by a phalanx of soldiers aiming their high pitched arcs at Li. They look like a swarm of fast moving locusts but Li just stands there. The arrows, after hitting a long wall behind where Li stood are revealed to have made a perfect outline of his body. The scene, with its emphasis on blacks and reds, and its use of location and time, plays better than most any other snippet of footage used to pimp a film this year.

    As a horde of men with spears encompass Li as he walks ever so slowly, poetically, we get another round of flying black arrows. As if to top the previous moment with Li, this time the arrows are shown making direct hits in the backs of Li’s people. The assault is vicious, swift and I find myself entrenching deeper into a feeling of sweet anticipation.

    After this we get the point that he’s out to defeat some of the kingdom’s biggest enemies, one by one, a la a real hard version of old school Nintendo’s Kung Fu where you get even more snakes and dudes coming after you, the action getting more and more intense with every confrontation. The backgrounds and costumes and direction look better than any action movie in recent memory. With a film like this there will be, invariably, connotations to CROUCHING TIGER… but those who feel the need to categorize this movie thusly for review purposes need a quick monkey punch to the temple. The film looks solidly able to stand on its own cinematic feet but these kinds of comparisons will hopefully raise the consciousness of the film and not deter potential converts.

    Debate all you want but I’ll tell you this: I know where I will be, finally, come August 27th. Yes, I understand this is, after all, just a movie but to be able and see someone flex some of the more lost elements of an action movie (story, direction, acting, etc…) is a treat worthy getting excited for and anticipating.

    August 6, 2004

    Trailer Park: August Already?

    Filed under: Columns,Trailer Park — admin @ 11:08 pm

    E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES

    By Christopher Stipp

    August 6, 2004

    AUGUST ALREADY?

    Another August, another scary portent for films that are usually find their way into the late Summer dumping grounds for all the crap studios want to unload before the fall gets underway at the end of September.

    What this means for you out there is that rough trade may be making its way into this column, from the really bad to the God-awful but no worries, as I’ll skewer “˜em up for you all in ways that will show how to spot these luminous pieces of garbage early enough so you don’t waste your money on some tepid August fare. I remember, too, when I thought XXX was going to be Vin Diesel’s entrance into big budget action flicks and be the first time a great action movie broke through on the downslide of a great summer movie season. Thank god the entrance was a revolving door because I still don’t think I’ve really got over how ashamed I was for wanting to see it as much as I did for as bad as it was.

    There is hope, however, this August.

    GARDEN STATE is opening wide here in the next few weeks and it seems like if you’re going to start coming off your adrenaline highs after SPIDER-MAN 2 and whatever else was better than SPIDER-MAN 2, GARDEN STATE seems like the way to go. From everything I’ve been hearing, the trailer is not the only good thing about the movie. Also, and this isn’t to say if you don’t you suck, but why not give a look see at what’s playing at your local art-house? This is a good time to check out some movies that would otherwise get short shrift during the Summer tent pole season and now’s a great time to start a deeper relationship with a medium who wants to be more than “just friends.”

    August can be a great time for movies but I hope you don’t ever say there’s nothing good out there because there is; it just isn’t sponsored by a series of fast food restaurants, a double CD, a breakfast cereal, a hot video starring your peeps from the OC, or going to get any love from the morning zoo crew at your local radio station. Seek and find your movie entertainment elsewhere as I promise there is something that will stay with you longer than the stench of XXX.


    TEAM AMERICA (2004) Director:Trey Parker, Matt Stone
    Cast:(voices) Trey Parker, Matt Stone, Elle Russ, Stanley G. Sawicki
    Release: October 22, 2004(Limited)
    Synopsis:Marionette superheroes fight to end terrorism and put tired celebrities out of their misery.
    View Trailer:
    * Large (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Positive. If I could judge this simply based on the idea behind this movie (marionettes out to save the world in the name of freedom and American Imperialism for all) I wouldn’t really know how something like this would play in execution.

    Seeing this trailer I can already feel that the path is now beset on both sides of those who will “get it” and those who will be confused at the use of small puppets on strings. I get it. It’s innovative and the trailer comes out swinging for the long ball and they hit it hard.

    The first thing that happens in this trailer, after we move past the Paramount logo (it’s always cool to see that. COMING TO AMERICA did it well too. Any other good movie out there employ this technique?), the visage of Earth comes into view as the very serious voice over starts in.

    “We live in a time of unparalleled danger”¦”

    The angle here is that the earth is in peril from terrorists, global chaos, and we live in a climate where uncertainty is de regur. All this and only one hope for humanity? What better way to illustrate what could happen next than by blowing up the earth? Before you can try and cobble what one has to do with the other we get names.

    (All in a sound that comes close to mimicking titanium slamming into titanium.)

    “Alec Baldwin, Sean Penn, Tim Robbins, George Clooney, Liv Tyler, Susan Sarandon, Martin Sheen, Janeane Garofalo, Michael Moore, George W. Bush, John Kerry, and Kim Jong-Il.”

    “Are all going to be really, really mad when they see”¦”

    And here are the players: puppets. We get snippets of turban-wearing terrorists, sparks shooting out of a very low-grade plane model and other images of things that were popular way back when the Thunderbirds were cutting edge.

    I’ll tell you something else about this film: Freedom hangs by a thread. This tagline is enough to elicit some smiles and it sure as hell beats the crap out of a few other “comedic” trailers that try and amuse. What is also worth noting about this trailer and may bring my journalistic cred into question: I saw the opening sequence that a majority of these clips were pulled from. My editor has read the script. Both of these things were both concluded with the idea that this flick is piss your pants funny. Obviously, no one has ever lost their lower bowel control due to a film’s hilarity but if you allow yourself to be open to the idea that marionettes can be laughable and are a marginal fan of the kind of comedy that Trey and Matt dabble in, you will not be disappointed.

    The trailer makes fun of big budget actioneers and it works in ways that hit every worthy note.


    PAPARAZZI (2004) Director:Louis Leterrier
    Cast:Cole Hauser, Larry Cedar, Tom Sizemore, Robin Tunney, Dennis Farina
    Release:September 3, 2004
    Synopsis:When an overzealous group of four paparazzi photographers cause a car accident that injures his wife (Robin Tunney) and son, a hot young (and very angry) movie star named Bo Laramie (Cole Hauser) concocts a revenge plot against them. Also stars Tom Sizemore and Dennis Farina.
    View Trailer:
    * Large (Quick Time)

    Prognosis: Negative. What a conceit.

    The throaty voice over guy (who, by all intents and purposes, tries real hard in this one to sound as menacing as he can) breaks down the specifics of what you think is a long-range rifle; silvery accents come into view, there is a heavy use of black, and it all points towards a weapon of awesome power. Too bad you already know he’s talking up a frigging Canon. It’s then that the whole premise of the movie is built upon is shown for all to see and then he says it.

    “It has the power to take a man apart.”

    Whoa, right there, Lone Ranger. Take a man apart? I watch Hollywood Hunt Club. It’s a little less salacious than Celebrities Uncensored, but it is a few notches more exciting. I find the program a real humanizing look at guys who make a living following around celebrities that will fetch them enough to live on. Public place, public celebrity, available camera? It’s a tight rope to walk along but guys like Ben, one of their featured photogs, are the kind of guys who seem to love what they do and his travails are just good reasons why reality TV is just plain addictive at times.

    The above explains why I have a hard time believing the whole cliché of a sleazy photographer and his posse plying their trade. Are they that gonzo? Do all the real in-your-face ones work for The Sun? But who cares about reality, really, when you have Hollywood, right? Right.

    So, what you have here in this trailer is Tom Sizemore, a slick looking paparazzo, who has a ONE HOUR PHOTO obsession with a disposable celebrity. The star in question is played up as “just one of us” who just happened to win the genetic lottery and leads the real good life while still retaining his sense of commonality. He even takes his kid to soccer and really roots for him on the sidelines. It’s sweet if just a little unbelievable.

    LARAMIE NAKED!

    The above is the cover of a tabloid that the A-lister’s wife holds in her paws as they glide along in their car as she asks her husband gingerly “can they do this?” in such a tone it got me to think. The question I would’ve liked asked is: What the hell are you doing walking around naked outside your house? Correct me if I’m wrong but if I decide to get down nudie style with my bad self in the backyard I should know there might be a possibility someone might catch me doing that and have a camera phone at the ready. If you’re that, um, hard up to get naked use some of your cash and build a damn solarium, retard. Problem solved.

    Moving from there, Sizemore looks like he’s playing the part of a kook of the highest order and there isn’t anyone else I would like to think could play the part better than him. I’ll give up some inches in this tug-of-war critique in saying that when I see some shenanigans like people breaking into the guy’s house, which the “bad” guys do, there’s a real good story there. That would be a great plot device, but then there’s a whole subplot of A-lister actor hitting Sizemore and the whole media circus surrounding how he has to attend anger management program and then Sizemore wants to destroy our Hollywood star, but this all just leaves me wondering what is going on. I’m thinking if I wanted to watch a vengeful photographer get back at a famous person I’ll just watch Celebrities Uncensored. The actor in this movie goes after a pack of these photographers, lethal style, taking things into his own hands but it just seems out of place. Maybe it’s just my reasoning but the guy is a major celebrity and he’s out picking these guys off one by one? I don’t buy it and I’m sure some real box office dollars will agree.


    CLOSER (2004) Director: Mike Nichols
    Cast: Julia Roberts, Jude Law, Natalie Portman, Clive Owen
    Release: December 24, 2004
    Synopsis: Director Mike Nichols brings Patrick Marber’s highly acclaimed theatrical tour de force CLOSER to the screen, an erotically charged tale of love, loneliness and betrayal featuring an all-star cast.
    View Trailer:
    * Small (Windows Media)

    Prognosis: Negative. How many times does the question come back to what came first: the director or the acting?

    Mike Nichols, the splendid eye behind such blockbusters as WORKING GIRL, WOLF, and WHAT PLANET ARE YOU FROM?, among others, comes at us again with this flick that has some heavy talent behind it. I don’t mean to disparage the bloke too much as it’s hard enough to make one movie but then to keep doing your job movie after movie it is quite a wonderful thing to have been able to do it; that being said, however, there are some major turkeys running around on this guy’s cinematic ranch. What is interesting to note, as well, is that he won an Emmy for Wit, a largely successful and evocative TV program that was carried on Emma Thompson’s shoulders. So, again, is it the director or is it the actor that really makes or breaks a performance?

    As this trailer begins Jude Law and Natalie Portman (cribbing a page from Kate Winslet’s hair styling guide from ETERNAL SUNSHINE OF THE SPOTLESS MIND) are excellent in the beginning bits of this thing. A car hits Portman and Law comes to help only to end up in bed with the girl. Not a bad way to start things off at all, I say, even if it’s Portman who looks like a girl who will sleep with you only to turn out to be a klepto. “Desire is a stranger”¦you think you know.”

    From Law and Portman we move to Owen and Roberts. Clive is doing his charismatic thing he does with alarming attraction while Roberts, well, is Roberts. That toothy smile reminds me of so many of her previous pictures that I await the day when I don’t think of the haunting video cover to MY BEST FRIEND’S WEDDING or MYSTIC PIZZA when I see those teeth. Oh yeah, the two of them are supposed to be in love.

    Cut to Law in front of a camera. Law takes pictures of Roberts, they flirt, and it is there that we see the beginnings of another movie about a sticky triangle that always seems to end up crushing someone under its foot. How does this one set itself apart, you may ask? It doesn’t, truth be told.

    We get Law, Roberts, Portman and Owen at a art gallery (almost looking like a sketch from Kids In The Hall based on a affair gone horribly south) and then, seconds later, we get Owen making Roberts admit she had enjoyable sex with Law in a scene that makes me look twice to see if I haven’t been watching a trailer for INDECENT PROPOSAL 2: THIS TIME THERE’S NO MONEY INVOLVED. Portman, then, essentially does the same thing to Law.

    Where does this all lead? Into the arms of the jilted and of the cuckolded, that’s where. This other Portman/Owen plot looks far more interesting, on second glance, when I see the moments that they share on the screen.

    The trailer gets a positive from me for Portman and Owen’s interspersed bits and a big negative to Law and Roberts for doing nothing more than appearing like jerk-offs to their significant others and to us like whiny cheaters who just want things they want them with none of the consequences.


    INTIMATE STRANGERS (2004) Director: Patrice Leconte
    Cast: Sandrine Bonnaire, Fabrice Luchini, Michel Duchaussoy
    Release: July 30, 2004 (limited)
    Synopsis: Mousy tax advisor William Faber (Luchini) receives a new client, Anna (Bonnaire), a beautiful, nervous woman who has mistaken him for a psychiatrist. But when she confides in him about her awful love life, he is both too embarrassed and intrigued to tell her the truth”¦.
    View Trailer:
    * Large (Quick Time)

    Prognosis: Positive. I’ve been watching this trailer for weeks and have finally decided to include it here because it’s been haunting me.

    The setup is great: woman goes in to see a psychologist, makes a wrong turn, ends up in a strange dude’s office, she assumes he’s the one she needs to talk to, she starts unloading, and he can’t bear to tell her she’s mistaken. That’s it.

    What is so delicious to see unfold, then, is what happens in the middle and how it comes to its eventual conclusion. It’s sweet and endearing in a way, when you see how meek the man looks in opposition to the sultriness of this strange woman who enters his life unexpectedly, but it’s a foreign film that piques just the right kind of interest.

    The man who directed this movie, responsible for GIRL ON THE BRIDGE and MAN ON THE TRAIN, has a great eye for not only direction but for having good stories to work with and mold. He knows what he’s doing with the people he directs and it shows in this trailer. These people look like they’re complete opposites but their attraction seems, somehow, more sublime.

    Yes, it is French and, yes, it does start off with establishing who the director guy is and how nifty it is that a dude from the Washington Post liked this movie, but the film has a real attraction even without all that fluffery. It seems to have a levity based on a good story than it does a smart gimmick. The gimmick may be simply the what-if element of a woman taking a wrong turn plotline but there seems to be an affableness of all those involved. Plus, that French chick is screaming fine.

    I know this one will be a movie that most here will let slide by at the art house, but I know my gut is telling me that if your lady wants to be taken to a romantic comedy you would be better served to endure this flick than most anything out there when this comes to your town, if at all. I wish there were more in this trailer to prove my point but since this is a foreign language movie, the marketing folks don’t want these actors talking out loud; especially if those people only speak French.


    BATMAN BEGINS (2004) Director:Christopher Nolan
    Cast: Christian Bale, Michael Caine, Liam Neeson, Morgan Freeman, Gary Oldman, Ken Watanabe, Katie Holmes, Cillian Murphy, Tom Wilkinson, Rutger Hauer
    Release: June 17, 2005
    Synopsis: A new restart of the “Batman” franchise under the helm of “Memento” Director Chris Nolan and more in tone with the early “Batman: Year One” style comics. As a boy a young Bruce Wayne watched in horror as his millionaire parents were slain in front of his eyes, a trauma which led him to become obsessed with revenge but his chance is cruelly taken away from him by fate. After disappearing to the East where he seeks counsel with the dangerous but honorable ninja cult leader known as Ra’s Al-Ghul, he returns to his now decaying Gotham City overrun by organised crime and dangerous individuals manipulating the system whilst the company he inherited is slowly being pulled out from under him. The discovery of a cave under his mansion, and a prototype armoured suit leads him to take on a new persona, one which will strike fear into the hearts of men who do wrong – he becomes, Batman. In the new guise, and with the help of rising cop Jim Gordon, Batman sets out to take down the various nefarious schemes in motion by individuals such as mafia don Falcone, the twisted doctor/drug dealer Jonathan ‘The Scarecrow’ Crane, and a mysterious third party that is quite familiar with Wayne and waiting to strike when the time is right.
    View Trailer:
    * Large (Quick Time)

    Prognosis: Positive. Riddle me this, Warner Brothers: Why on God’s green earth, when you have the epicenter of Nerddom at your fingertips, the veritable makers of the so-called “buzz” you industry love to talk about so much, wouldn’t you show this trailer at the Comic-Con?

    What makes the question a little more puzzling to get an answer to is the additional evidence that someone had already seen the trailer for this movie well in advance of the release on the Internet, well in advance of the Con, and described it shot for shot? If you ask me, and I know you’re not asking and don’t care what the answer is, these last three weeks represent the worst handling of a film this magnitude in a long time. The audiences have left from I, ROBOT, the Con has come and gone, and the best thing you could do, Warner, is get a mention, mid-week, on a few significant movie sites. Who the hell cares about this anyway, right? It’s just a property that’s been raped more times than a child molester in general population, so forget it, right?

    I can’t.

    What I like about this trailer is, well, everything. We get Bale doing a voice over as we see a young master Bruce at his parent’s funeral. Bale says he caught of glimpse of something the night his parents were murdered and he’s been looking for it ever since. The violins in the background, pulled taught and ratcheting the tension just enough, are well placed and fit the moment here like a found puzzle piece that completes a picture.

    He’s shown traversing some pretty rough terrain: snowy, rainy, sandy, cold. We understand he’s on a quest and when it seems he can look no further, we get a shadowy figure that blocks our view and it only heightens speculation what it could be.

    Bale eventually says that thing that wants revenge is him. We catch a too-fast glimpse of the bat-costume but this teaser has done more than enough. It establishes itself as the anti-Batman of all that have come before it and it states, categorically, without even uttering a word, that there is no kiss from a rose nor will there be any stories written on the size of anyone’s cod pieces. Of all the films that don’t come out until next year, CONSTANTINE being the exception here, there isn’t really another movie that shows just enough of the film to really whet an appetite. Movie marketing 101 should always start with the rule that if you have a fan base that is wanting to see your film (your Spider-Man freaks, your X-Men nuts, your sequel junkies) get some actual clips out there for geeks to pick apart. People will talk endlessly about your film until you give them another taste. By doing this, by heightening expectation, you can, at the very least, guarantee a good first weekend opening and this trailer does a great job in getting that result started. Getting your property known is the name of the game and, so far, the movie is getting known for all the wrong reasons.

    It’s a great trailer, it has a great premise, but there is piss poor managing of the entire execution of the release for this thing. (I still wish you could have seen how surly Bale looked for the prerecorded bit right before a lackluster Q/A at the Con. Hilarious.)

    July 30, 2004

    Trailer Park: Who is Dr. Tran?

    Filed under: Columns,Trailer Park — admin @ 5:04 pm

    E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES

    By Christopher Stipp

    July 30, 2004

    WHO IS DR. TRAN?

    What a nerdfest.

    I have never had to endure so much concentrated geek in one place than I did at this year’s Comic-Con in San Diego. It was great.

    Seeing how it was my first year to this year’s convention it was definitely something that will need to steep in my mind, to allow it to permeate the fibers of my synapses, before I really appreciate the entire experience. I can tell you, though, there were some definite high-, and really low, lights. Let me see if I can’t break this down to give you equal parts travelogue, commentary, and severely slanted opinion. Let’s see if I can’t get this done in a logical progression.

    Negative: First, arriving at the Con, I noticed a very distinct issue with parking around the convention hall. Never in all my years living around a metropolitan city has there been such piss poor planning on a city’s part that ensured that if you were going to one of these things, if you weren’t there before doors opened, you would have to traverse multiple city blocks just to find a parking spot and then have to hoof it back in the direction you just came from just to get into the Con. If it sounds slightly convoluted, it was.

    Negative: Note to festival organizers: you can never have too much AC pumping through a building when you have a majority of the convention hall that has a great deal of natural light streaming through it. It’s really bitchin’, you know, the whole using Ma Nature to light up a building thing, but even my dumb ass paid attention long enough in science class to know that while the light enters a room, the heat it brings with it likes to stay trapped between the glass and carpet. It’s not cool when you have thousands of geeks, already shoulder to shoulder, huddled inside a room, smelling each other’s hygiene habits and most not having any conception of the word “soap”, but, damn, flip a switch somewhere. When dorks start complaining they can’t shuffle their Magic: The Gathering cards then you can be allowed to turn things up.

    Positive: Meeting Ryall, Comics 101’s Scott Tipton, and Squib Central’s Joshua Jabcuga. Ryall is probably one of the most genial individuals at the Con and I was glad to have finally put a face to all the soulless e-mails that I’ve been sending to the guy for the past six months. While I wish I could’ve rapped to the guy without herds of pimps touting their comic book project as the next WATCHMEN (one dude shoved his project in front of Ryall as we were talking and essentially just left as soon as Ryall had it in his hands. It was a drive-by of the oddest proportions.) It seemed that other people wanted an audience with him and it proved futile. I did see him chatting with the PUNSIHER himself, Tom Jane, at the IDW booth but instead of breaking up the conversation I was happy to just geek-out off to the side without jeopardizing my position here. Hanging with Joshua was the highlight on my Friday night and, along with his girlfriend, it felt like we had been hanging out for years. The bar we were at was packed with talent ranging from Frank Miller to Joe Quesada and even Neil Gaiman was spotted a few feet away from the bar proper. Hopefully, there will be some positive things to come of the very productive conversation we all had, but it was just nice to have a good evening out on the town with or without the likes of Ryall. Dude would’ve probably been a buzz kill anyway”¦I only kid because I kare.

    Positive: The INCREDIBLES panel. Probably one of the coolest things I saw all weekend was the extended scenes from this movie. The trailer is spot on, no doubt about it, and it fills me with geek excitement to say that it deserves any success it receives. While I think it is lame that Disney gets to put its rodent fingers on this project, a comment I brought up in the Q and A, this film should showcase, and only solidify, the power that Pixar has as a company. Most interesting thing to come out of the conversation? That you can have all the explosions, destruction and mayhem you want in an animated movie, no problem, but the moment you ask an animator to have a character put their hand on a shirt all hell is unleashed. I now understand it to be the benchmark between good and great animation. I could sit and listen to Brad Bird all afternoon. The man seems very passionate about his work. Also, they showed the first teaser to HITCHHIKER’S GUIDE TO THE GALAXY to which all the nerds flipped out of their pocket protectors. If anyone would like to fill me in about why in the hell this book series is as successful as it is, let me know. I have about zero knowledge on the subject and would love to know what’s what.

    Positive: Dave Philbin. The man is my hero for vocally berating an overzealous line-cutter as we all waited in line for free swag that we all will probably throw away in a few weeks time. It was everything I thought a public shaming could be and more.

    Positive: BLADE 3 panel. Goyer was open, amiable, and seemed happy to be there. Jessica Biel and Ryan Reynolds seemed comfortable and it was just a great look at what BLADE 3 could be. The extended clips they showed, one of Biel and one of Reynolds, showed you exactly what this movie is going to be like. Hopefully, now, they can decide on an ending everyone can live with.

    Negative: Even though I happened to miss it at the BATMAN BEGINS panel, but thank god they replayed it at Trailer Park on Sunday morning, a very pissed looking Christian Bale wants to thank your sorry ass for wanting to see the new movie and he hopes you screw yourself when the film hits next year. Oh, he also wants to pass along some warm death to your mother. It was probably the most uncomfortable pre-recorded message I’ve ever had the extreme pleasure of seeing with my own two eyes. It was wicked awesome. He had, literally, all of sixty seconds to just stand next to Christopher Nolan and just appear to look he was a happy Batman. Hey, I’m not him so he can be however he wants to be; makes no difference to me. I’m just reporting what I saw. I wish I would’ve recorded it”¦

    Positive: Adrian Tomine. He was probably the second greatest thing about this Con. If anyone is familiar with his work and had the pleasure of seeing his panel on Saturday you know how he is the antidote to all things hype and B.S. that seems to permeate some things on the floor of the convention hall. The man is a great, deliberate and delicate storyteller and he just was perfect parts shy and charismatic. OPTIC NERVE is the cool.

    Positive: SIN CITY panel. You’ve probably already read about all the stuff that went down during this so I won’t rehash it. The footage, while it was all very spectacular, starring the likes of Jessica Alba, Rosario Dawson and even Clive Owen, the Mickey Rourke and Nick Stahl in prosthetic makeup, reminded me a bit of DICK TRACY of all things. You’ll get to see it for yourself soon.

    Positive: TEAM AMERICA. You’ve probably already”¦yeah, all that from above. Trey Parker and Matt Stone were probably the most frank in terms of letting people know about how they felt about their production. Their marionette frustration was heartfelt and two thumbs up, way up, for showing the intro to the film plus a little extra scene. I wish I could say that only a few people laughed, just to be accurate about this, but everyone was laughing their asses off. They looked exhausted but enthused enough to be there. Lesser mortals would’ve sent a PR rep to take care of things. Good stuff. Real good stuff. Also, the goodie bags that they gave away after this panel were super cool. Among other things, I have an official TEAM AMERICA t-shirt with its emblem on front with the words WORLD POLICE in bold black on the back.

    Positive: Ever wonder what it’s like to be standing quietly by yourself, only to be jostled by the sound of a double door opening, nay, whipping open, followed by a 40-year-old shut-in who starts to dial numbers on their cell phone only to say, “I know what the name of the new STAR WARS movie is!”? It makes your day. It really does. Funniest thing I saw all weekend and I still find myself talking about it.

    Negative: Does the world really need Star Wars mini-blinds? Lucas thinks so and was selling them on the floor of the Con.

    Positive: The Adult Swim panel. These are the harbingers of all things funny in animation and it was great to see these people talk about what they love to do. It’s a job but they are getting it done week after week. Chris Ward (aka mc chris) was the highpoint of this thing. This leads us to”¦

    Negative: The people asking questions at the Adult Swim panel. I don’t know how much brain power it takes, but dammit people, if you’re going to go to the mic have something remotely interesting to ask. I heard two “˜tards that thought it was funny to do impressions of Aqua Teen Hunger Force for the panel. It would’ve been fine if they did it for the panel and said “thanks for making great stuff. I love you guys for the work you do” but that didn’t come. It was a bunch of uncomfortable silences out of these ventriloquists after they were done. The panel, at times, didn’t know what to do. At one point, after they showed a clip for a new show that will be debuting later this fall, someone screamed out, “you can do better!” Shit, man, these people don’t come all this way to be publicly harangued by indolent dolts. Have a concern? Seek out the English language and yearn to put words in the place of feelings that accurately define an issue you may have in a constructive manner. Idiot. I’m sure they are rearing to come back next rear. They even gave away some of the coolest free crap. They handed out free DVD’s and a pack of cards with Adult Swim properties peppering the entire deck.

    Positive: One of the most positive experiences I had all weekend came in the form of an interview I did with Breehn Burns, creator of DR. TRAN, a short animated film that mocks trailers and was the funniest entry in this year’s Spike and Mike’s Festival of Animation. I’ll be transcribing it all for your pleasure, displeasure, depending on what you think of reading interviews, but I cannot say enough about the kind of faith that is restored in humanity when you meet someone as congenial and open as he was. Who is Dr. Tran? Stay tuned in the next few weeks to find out.

    Now, on with what most of you came here to read: movie trailer reviews”¦


    MEET THE FOCKERS (2004) Director:Jay Roach
    Cast:Robert De Niro, Ben Stiller, Dustin Hoffman, Barbra Streisand, Teri Polo
    Release:December 22, 2004
    Synopsis:The makers and stars behind the runaway hit of 2000, Meet the Parents, are re-united in the follow-up comedy, Meet the Fockers. Now that Greg Focker (Stiller) is “in” with his soon-to-be in-laws, Jack (De Niro) and Dina Byrnes, it looks like smooth sailing for him and his fiancée, Pam (Polo). But that’s before Pam’s parents meet Greg’s parents, the Fockers. The hyper-relaxed Fockers and the tightly-wound Byrneses are woefully mismatched from the start, and no matter how hard Greg and Pam try, there is just no bringing their families together – which all adds up to a disastrously funny time of “getting to know you.”
    View Trailer:
    * Medium (Windows Media, QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Positive. This trailer likes to use the method of reminding people what came before it by using clips from the previous film to make sure everyone is on the same page.

    ‘ I liken what they do here as the same thing that happens in a flick where one of the really smart scientist guys says to their boss, or vise versa, “why don’t you just put that in English for me” or “imagine I’m 13-years-old.” Never mind the fact that all the people that person is talking to is intelligent enough to understand it, they’re really only saying that because of you, the audience. With these clips, made funnier by Barbara Streisand’s “Memories” it helps to soften the audience-as-retards-who-wouldn’t-know-a-sequel-from-their-ass mentality that some of these trailer cobblers have in mind when they create these things.

    What’s nice about this trailer, and keeps it from veering into scrotum punch bait-and-switch territory, is that the filmmakers give us some new footage to chew on and it’s pretty amusing. Streisand looks great as Focker’s mother, Stiller plays up the slighted, comedic straight man with great aplomb, and Dustin Hoffman, if he can do it, will hopefully provide a good comic foil to DeNiro’s tougher than-leather-attitude. What’s nice about the cast is that Streisand really can ham up the overbearing mother shtick with Hoffman playing the sensitive dad role if that’s the direction they want to take. If we get two Jack’s together in this thing I am not sure it would work as well. Thankfully we get Hoffman, sitting on the other side of a showering DeNiro, acting like it’s no big deal.

    The teaser only gives a little glimpse of actual film, but it’s good enough for now to see that there could be something positive here. What I hope happens, and it looks like the trailer gives but a glimpse of the possibility, is that Focker’s family is somehow subtly twisted in nature. Slapstick really only worked in the first when Stiller’s intentions were always pure. If it’s done intentionally, though, in this sequel I can only portend a turkey worthy enough for your mom and dad to get a giggle before they catch the Early Bird special at Denny’s.


    THE MOTORCYCLE DIARIES (2004) Director:Walter Salles
    Cast:Gael García Bernal, Rodrigo De la Serna, Mía Maestro, Mercedes Morán, Jorge Chiarella
    Release:September 24, 2004
    Synopsis:The Motorcycle Diaries is an adaptation of a journal written by Ernesto “Che” Guevara (Bernal) when he was 23 years old. He and his friend, Alberto Granado (de la Serna) are typical college students who, seeking fun and adventure before graduation, decide to travel across Argentina, Chile, Brazil and Peru in order to do their medical residency at a leper colony. Beginning as a buddy/road movie in which Ernesto and Alberto are looking for chicks, fun and adventure before they must grow up and have a more serious life. As is said in the film itself, it’s about “two lives running parallel for a while.” The two best friends start off with the same goals and aspirations, but by the time the film is over, it’s clear what each man’s destiny has become.
    View Trailer:
    * Medium (Real Player)

    Prognosis: This deserves a Jeff Spicoli “Awesome. Totally Awesome.” Focus Features, responsible for ETERNAL SUNSHINE OF THE SPOTLESS MIND and LOST IN TRANSLATION, have been putting out some great, evocative cinematic gems and this film looks to continue the tradition.

    When you have a film that starts with a quote from Nelson Mandela about Che Guevara, you know that the source material is at least going to deal with someone who had something to do with changing the social consciousness of a generation. What’s amusing is the quote that follows after it: Che is fairly intellectual for a Latino. The quote came from a declassified CIA document.

    A wonderful guitar soundtrack, rhythmic and soothing, sits gently underneath the narrator letting us know exactly what this movie is about: a road trip via motorcycle. Che and his traveling companion want to go five-thousand miles in four months exploring a single continent. They say the method by which they will explore, travel and experience this trip, as if to be daringly artistic, is by improvisation. All I see is two dudes on a motorcycle, but it is of little matter to me.

    Gael looks ruggedly perfect for the role. This shows a dramatic departure from his pot-head role in Y TU MAMA TAMBIEN, not to take away anything from the electric performance he gave in that film, and he appears to be the one man who could actually do the part without carrying a lot of baggage from other projects he might have been known for doing.

    The content of this trailer, though, mostly uses physicality as its language, as you can’t have people actually speaking Spanish and putting up subtitles because that might scare whitey away from the art house, but it does everything beautifully. The cinematography feels humid and it sticks to you as images of hot days in the sun and sweaty afternoons on the road play out on the screen.

    For some people like Ernest Hemmingway, traveling defined their character. For those who could do it, traveling took on a different meaning than it does now. Some now are able to afford the luxury to travel to different continents, to be immersed in other languages and experiences. These things shape the people they actually become and it nowhere does it look better illustrated in recent history than it does here.

    I don’t usually opine for many artistic films in any given year, flicks like a new one entitled FATHERS AND SONS just reeks of the kind of art that’s destined to languish in its own dense pretentiousness, but this one really gets me wanting and waiting for the time when I can go out and see if Gael can become the kind of man who will eventually lead a nation to think differently about itself. Bravo, good sir.


    THE FORGOTTEN (2004) Director:Joseph Ruben
    Cast:Julianne Moore, Dominic West, Gary Sinise, Alfre Woodard, Linus Roache, Anthony Edwards
    Release: September 24, 2004
    Synopsis:Julianne Moore stars as Telly Paretta, a grieving mother struggling to cope with the loss of her 8-year-old son. She is stunned when her psychiatrist (Sinise) reveals that she has created eight years of memories about a son she never had. But when she meets a man (West) who has had a similar experience, Telly embarks on a search to prove her son”˜s existence and her sanity.
    View Trailer:
    * Large (Windows Media)

    Prognosis: Positive. Julianne Moore is the kind of A-lister who seems to from movies like EVOLUTION to things like THE HOURS with seamless grace and without a whole lot of people noticing the difference. Good for her.

    This film, not poised to win any Oscar for direction, looks like one that your mom and dad, or your girlfriend because this movie deals with kids and we all know how the ladies respond to those little people, will have a good time seeing.

    The flick starts out harmless enough. There are kids playing on a playground. They’re having a good time, probably are eating sand and slinging rocks at each other’s head while doing it, and Julianne Moore is the quintessential mother just watching it all with motherly grace. While this seems like a movie that’s going to end with the demise of her kid, per the policy on heavy mood music that chimes in what is supposed be family time, things start to drift from her fingers. While her husband, played by Gilbert aka Anthony Edwards (hey, that’s two Nerds in two weeks for those keeping score at home), seems like he’s not the one who is going to have anything to do what’s on the horizon I am stupefied by what is coming around the bend.

    As Julianne appears to drift off to sleep, she gazes at a nicely taken JC Penny-style 5×7 of her and her family. Next morning, she wakes up, and, as the sun comes up, I am chanting for zombies to come barreling through her bedroom door. Unfortunately, this isn’t the right kind of movie. I’m bummed for what seems like hours but I did find the fact that the kid is no longer in the picture beside the bed, amusing. Of course Gilbert has no idea what’s going on when he’s confronted, he’s too busy trying to reconcile feelings of guilt for having left his first true geek love back at Adams College, but Julianne is adamant. She checks old scrapbooks: blank. She looks at old video tapes: blank.

    Awesome. The kid never existed. She’s getting frantic, hysterical and about to lose her mind. This is the kind of film I can get behind.

    Of course, Julianne is freaking out, calling out her kid’s name in the very same park from the beginning. Gary Sinise steps in as the resident shrink and lets her know some people invent entire lives and so we’re not too sure if she’s crazy or, because this is a Hollywood movie, if this isn’t some plot by bobble headed Martian extraterrestrials looking to do an anal probe on ol’ Moore. Then, like a page ripped right out of the TRADING PLACES script, she finds her husband again only to find out he doesn’t know who the crazy chick is. Me, personally? If I didn’t have anything going on, and I was as old as Anthony, and looked as old as Anthony, and didn’t already have a lady in my life, I might’ve played along and had a little crazy love. However, what does happen is that she tracks the dude from the beginning of the trailer, who was in the park with her, Dominic West, and lets him know how crazy she is. Of course, he doesn’t believe a word she’s talking about and tries to show her the quickest way to Bellevue but, before he can say “How long have you been off your meds?” Julianne rips some fabric off the man’s wall, a shocked look glazes his O face, and she shows him she’s not entirely insane.

    After this it’s go time as the man from the Wire tells Julianne that he remembers things now, she’s not alone, blah blah blah, but before he can completely reconcile, and apologize for being a little bitch with her, some dudes accost homeboy in the street and try to shut him up. Julianne takes off on foot before she’s taken out and both she and our main man manage to not only escape but are able to kidnap an “agent” who was trying to kidnap them (I know, I’m getting confused at this point, too) strap him to a chair and try to find out what’s what. When they start asking questions about what is happening to the two of them our hostage quietly whispers says that “they” are listening (we’re never really told who) and then, in one of the most abrupt non sequiturs I’ve seen in a while, an entire roof of a house is ripped off and we’re all left holding our collective Johnson’s wondering what the hell just happened.

    I may not be too far off with my mutant alien theory.


    A SOUND OF THUNDER (2004) Director: Peter Hyams
    Cast: Edward Burns, Ben Kingsley, Catherine McCormack
    Release: August 8, 2004
    Synopsis: Based on a short story by master of science fiction Ray Bradbury, the sci-fi action adventure A Sound of Thunder is set in the future, when time travel is not only possible ““ it’s a lucrative monopoly. It’s especially profitable for Charles Hatton (Kingsley), the owner of Time Safari Inc., a travel agency that specializes in escorting wealthy clients on exclusive hunting trips back to the Prehistoric Age. Under the leadership of seasoned scout Dr. Travis Ryer (Burns), participants are permitted to hunt and kill dinosaurs provided they follow a set of strenuous rules. These guidelines are intended to protect the creatures’ natural habitats and prevent time travelers from impacting the course of evolution. When an expedition is compromised and the rules are broken, the hunters return to the future…and discover the world is a markedly different place than it was when they left. As “time waves” ripple from the Prehistoric past through the present to the uncharted future, Ryer teams up with Sonia Rand (McCormack), the inventor of the time travel technology, to unravel the mystery behind the catastrophic historical changes that are threatening to erase humanity from existence.
    View Trailer:
    * Large (Quick Time)

    Prognosis: Negative. This movie looks so bad that I am not sure if the fault lay in the hair helmet on Sir Kingsley or if it’s the Sci-Fi Channel movie-of-the-week look to this B-movie.

    The movie starts out sweet enough, though. We’re told how life is a balance and how a minor infraction can cause total insanity. There is thunder and rain and slo-mo effects made with water droplets but what’s weird is that all that other imagery stops and from that point we go from a lecture on nature to a screenshot that says Chicago: 2054. Even before I start to mentally ponder the implications of my home town Chicago circa 2054 (I wonder if I can still get an Italian Beef? I hope the Cubs have at least made it to another playoff game. Is Daley still the mayor? ), you know, the basics, I get a glimpse of Ben Kingsley I’ve never seen before. That is quite the silver coif. Does this flash of the future imply that hairstyles will all change? Hell no, because Ben’s the only mo-fo with a “˜do that looks like he stepped out of a time machine set 100 years too late. Everyone else looks perfectly normal.

    Disregarding that minor quibble, Ben lays it out cryptically: someone is going out on a hunt and someone’s gonna die; again, I know, it confused me too. The professionals involved, who ostensibly are going out to do the “hunting,” as Ben puts it, look like soldiers from HALO but don’t have quite the same heavy hardware to back them up. I am still confused how everything goes together and am trying to figure out why these solider guys look like they’re walking into X-Men’s Savage Land, but it’s the T-Rex that pulls this thing together. Dinosaur? Huh? Where the hell is this going? In true Harryhausen fashion we get a dinosaur that appears to be on loan from PEE-WEE’S BIG ADVENTURE. You know the part I’m talking about. It’s that dream sequence where the thing eats Pee-Wee’s bike? Yeah, in all its 1985ian splendor we get a T-Rex that looks as menacing as a case of scabies.

    Some of the more astute readers of Ray Bradbury out there know the plot already but what I understand this movie to be about as I watch Edward Burns pick up a paycheck, er, I mean, act is that someone stepped off a path somewhere in this jungle land and this accounts for why there are dinosaurs that are out of control (seen it in JURASSIC PARK). There are small bugs that seem to eat people whole (already done in THE MUMMY), and this adds up as to why there are big bats and large snakes (LOST BOYS and ANACONDA, respectively). There are baboons, though. If they have red asses I will, at the very least, give the film a pass; baboons are funny and cool.

    I really can’t explain what is going on by the end, not with the plot but with the actors who agreed to do this, but call me crazy when I say this looks like an utter disappointment. It’s too bad as I saw Ray Bradbury looking genuinely happy as he introduced this at the Comic-Con this year. I do like director Peter Hyams’ work and I hate to think this may tarnish the reputation he built off of TIMECOP which seems to me to be a better time transplanting movie than this. Where’s some Van Damme when you need it? I can imagine it: Jean-Claude is in a pith helmet and some green Steve Irwin plum smuggler shorts. He spots a T-Rex and walks slowly towards it with his shoulder blades raised above his neck, spinning his head around back and forth, up and down, ready to inflict some Van-Damage. “Aaa..’scuse me Mr. Dinosaur, have you met these two fists of human evolution? You “˜bout to, my good friend.” A couple of splits later, some ballerina moves to look like he can actually practice some martial arts, he ends everything by vaulting a coconut into the T-Rex’s mouth.

    I would see that movie.


    NICOTINA (2003) Director: Hugo Rodríguez
    Cast: Marta Belaustegui, Rosa María Bianchi, Lucas Crespi, Daniel Giménez Cacho, Rafael Inclán, Enoc Leaño, Diego Luna, Carmen Madrid, Jesús Ochoa
    Release: August 20, 2004
    Synopsis: From the producers of “Amores Perros” comes “Nicotina,” a highly stylized crime caper set in Mexico City about a simple exchange that goes awry, causing the lives of nine unsuspecting characters to explode in one tumultuous night over a fortune in diamonds. Diego Luna stars as computer hacker Lolo, who is infatuated with his neighbor Andrea (Marta Belaustegui) and catalogs her every move via high-tech peeping devices. Lolo teams with amateur criminals Tomson (Jesús Ochoa) and his younger counterpart Nene (Lucas Crespi) in a deal with a Russian mobster (Norman Sotolongo) that involves the exchange of diamonds for computer access to Swiss bank accounts. But the deal goes terribly wrong after Lolo’s attempts to spoil Andrea’s romantic trysts spiral out of control. Down the street, the irritable pharmacist Beto (Daniel Giménez Cacho) and his fed-up wife Clara (Carmen Madrid) get inadvertently entangled in the exchange, along with the humble barber Goyo (Rafael Inclán) and his domineering other half Carmen (Rosa María Bianchi). Infected with diamond lust, these characters become obsessed with the intoxicating possibility of an easy life and their greed quickly transforms into fiery desperation. When the haze finally clears, computers have been hacked, people have been whacked and lives have gone up in a cloud of smoke.
    View Trailer:
    * Medium (Quick Time)

    Prognosis: Positive. I think the reason I liked this trailer the most this week is that it tries to emulate a genre, the multiple story line film, and it keeps things gritty, interesting and doesn’t let up until the end.

    I’ve seen comparisons of this film to PULP FICTION, SNATCH, LOCK, STOCK AND TWO SMOKING BARRELS, but this only serves to understand the thin surface of what looks like an interesting caper flick. When this trailer opens up, with Tejano-esque trumpets blaring, we see that what we have here is a kid, the other half of the self-gratifying duo from Y TU MAMA TAMBIEN, hacking into some Swiss bank accounts. Now, I understand the derivative use of the Swiss as the nexus for all things crime related. In fact, I half expect, when I eventually get there in real life, to find men with briefcases handcuffed to their wrists, trench coats pulled close to the body, women with ostentatiously large and bushy blonde wigs on as they don dark sunglasses and pull their trench coats even closer to their bodies, but, as it pertains to this trailer, all is forgiven as we quickly see this movie is all a matter of diamonds, chicks, guns, and a pissed off Russian; it’s a quadfecta in my book.

    Anyhow, after the opening, the trailer breaks things down real stupid-like so even you at home, who don’t parlez Espanol or who are illiterate, can enjoy all the foreign goodness as we are introduced to all the main players. For those of you who can decipher English I encourage you to read the labels given to all the people shown in this trailer. We see that a hacker in Spanish is called El Hacker, a Russian is called El Russian, a barber is called El Barber, and a woman is called La Chick. Had I known Spanish would’ve been this easy I really would’ve paid attention to Sra. Riesco’s lectures on the benefits of using the past imperfect in everyday Spanish parlance.

    A pervish related note about La Chick: you get a little sneak peek at her lacy undergoods so it may behoove you to actually check this thing out. So, after we get some of her, the narrative picks up and we are thoroughly contorted and twisted as we try to understand who is playing whom in this grand scheme of thievery. I don’t know if the hacker kid is above reproach, but it makes sense that he should be our protagonist. For the rest of the clowns that pack this movie I am not really sure if it’s a free-for-all or if there is someone we should be pulling for by the end of the credits. I do have the keen vision to see that there is a lot of bumbling and cat-and-mouse type chasing that is always a hoot to watch on the big screen. Also, the folks at The Truth may agree with it but there is a damn large amount of cigs being puffed in just this trailer alone, hence the Spanish cognate as a title, but I am not sure how it plays into the larger narrative. Again, without knowing any more than the gravelly, throaty narrator is giving up I don’t know any more about how things may or may not end. I do like the mariachi music near the end of this thing and it adds a Latin flavor that doesn’t escape my attention.

    Now, it may or may not help that this movie is assisted by the producers of AMORES PERROS, the definition of a producer nowadays being open to more interpretation than Bill Clinton’s examination of the word “sex” under oath, but it does give this otherwise small film a name cache that can only help it get into a few more theaters than it otherwise would in a couple of months.

    Now, if only someone can explain why in God’s name someone decided to defraud the fine Spanish speaking population of the world into thinking the accordion is a socially acceptable instrument, which it is not unless you live in Oshkosh, Wisconsin, and like to say “ya hey der” as a way to start a conversation, I think I’ll be all set.

    July 23, 2004

    Trailer Park: Con…Con…Cooonnn!

    Filed under: Columns,Trailer Park — admin @ 5:03 pm

    E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES

    By Christopher Stipp

    July 23, 2004

    CON…CON”¦COOONNN!

    Yup, I’ve decided to make trek as a fan of the comic art form in the 20 years or so of actual collecting, I think I’ve amassed a bigger collection than Brodie, and am actually indulging in the spectacle that is the San Diego Comicon. I have no clue what to expect, no idea what I’ll see (if I don’t see someone dressed as a Stormtrooper/X-Men/Lady Death I’ll be sorely upset), and am ramping my anticipations up to finally find a copy of that FANTASTIC FOUR bootleg that seems to be more prevalent in the comic book community than any STD. On the work related tip, there will be a Trailer Park presentation, not mine but the Con’s own, and it seems like it has been a tradition there for a while, and I will most definitely be there to catch it no matter how short (a half a freaking hour? C’mon, that’s like 13 or so trailers. I could stand to watch a good hour or so before feeling like I’ve eaten a whole tub of Dryer’s Rocky Road.) I’ll be there trying to find any new trailers that make their debut. For those interested, I’ll be around many of the panels from studios that are pimping their 2005 projects and if you know you’re going to be at one (the schedules for most everything are up at the Con’s website) shoot me a note to tell me what you thought of whatever they show; be they clips, trailers or previews of any kind, I’d love to know. The panels that will by hyping CONSTANTINE and BATMAN BEGINS, for example, are just a couple that will hopefully be showcasing something noteworthy and if I get anything worth writing home about, I’ll do it right here.

    Also, for those that just want to say hey, let me know if you’ll be around anywhere specific. For those who want to make the effort to actually tell me to my face what you think of the column here I’ll be armed with something that doesn’t entirely suck for you that will reward your honesty. I hope to holy heaven this will be worth the five hours it will take to drive there. The fun starts when I get there this morning, drunk with the idea that every girl who dresses up like Lady Death will be looking like the comic. Lord only knows the reality that awaits.

    In trailer news, for those who eschew that sort of thing, you need to be checking out DANNY THE DOG which, I admit, sounds like Disney’s latest box office bomb. It’s dank, it’s gritty, it’s effective and there seems to be a lot of Jet Li in a role that looks to mix a little hardcore action with a sweetness that I don’t think we’ve been privy to before. Also, for those who want a little drama in their life check out the trailer for RAY. This biopic of Ray Charles’ life is not only timely, but, damn, if I wasn’t jazzed as all hell to see it. The movie actually has Dudley Dawson. Dudley “Booger” Dawson. Some are all butt hurt that this film is being released too close to Charles’ death and their arguments make no sense and hold no water. Ignore the naysayers and look at how Jamie Foxx actually has some genuine charisma and talent. It has to have been a cold one in Hades for me to have written that previous sentence.


    TOUCH OF PINK (2004) Director:Ian Iqbal Rashid
    Cast:Jimi Mistry, Kyle MacLachlan, Kristen Holden-Ried, Suleka Mathew
    Release: July 16, 2004 (Limited)
    Synopsis:A comic clash of cultures, values and sexuality, TOUCH OF PINK is a romantic comedy featuring Alim (Jimi Mistry), a young South Asian-Canadian, now living in London, who is so caught up in the romance, style and dreams of the old movies that he thinks he’s living with the spirit of Cary Grant (Kyle MacLachlan). But Alim’s ideal life in London with lover Giles (Kristen Holden-Ried) begins to unravel when his mother Nuru (Suleka Mathew) shows up. She’s come to London to find Alim a proper Ismaili-Muslim girlfriend and to convince him to come home to Canada and join the family for his cousin’s spectacular wedding. Once in Toronto, Alim’s different worlds begin to collide and he has to choose between his fantasy life with Cary and the earthier pleasures of real life.
    View Trailer:
    * Medium (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Positive. Kyle MacLachlan has a role not unlike Val Kilmer as Elvis in TRUE ROMANCE. In this film, however, Kyle is a psychological manifestation that acts like a sage for a young and confused gay man.

    We are first introduced to Alim, the man who this movie revolves around, in his natural homestead element. He lives with a caring boyfriend who understands Alim’s need to hide his sexuality from his deeply religious mother who is coming to visit in London. And, as an Ismaili-Muslim, Alim recognizes the need to at once be true to who he is but, as we see in the trailer, hide any vestige of his homosexuality so she suspects nothing. It’s, essentially, your standard game of hiding your sexuality from your parents kind of film.

    However, there are some elements that help buoy the trailer along.

    One of the really nice things about this trailer is the music. Usually, the tunes used to pimp one of these modern comedies are loud, boisterous and usually involve Top 40 crap. The smoky piano jazz that gets some play, the seriousness of the comedic element played for effect instead of bombastic slapstick, all gives this trailer a very nurturing vibe. I envisioned a disco anthem so prevalent to so many other movies when a mother/father/family comes to visit and the inhabitants (be they a live-in girlfriend/boyfriend/barnyard animal) scramble to make themselves disappear.

    I really appreciate the way it pokes fun at Alim’s need to hide himself. At one point MacLachlan tosses books up into the air, during the pre-hiding, labeling them as gay or as too sexual to be lying around. Alim’s inner voice tells him to come out to his mother but Cary Grant will hear none of that. Giles, his boyfriend, is introduced as his “roommate,” a term so derisively used even in modern day parlance that it’s nearly a cliché whenever it’s employed, and you all can just guess that hilarity ensues from that initial meeting. There’s the innuendo, the cat and mouse game of almost getting caught, all fairly standard stuff. What makes this movie stand out, overall, is the tone in which it is selling itself.

    When you have a romantic comedy like this one certainly is, and is itself not ashamed for actually advertising itself as such, you have limited options. Most times with any other movie of this variety you see things glossed with a high studio shine and immediately have no love for them, read here: WIMBLEDON, but with this film it’s seriousness is endearing. Even though I can tell you how this is going to end just based on what I see going here, I have much more respect for this production simply because it’s played, ahem, straight. There a genuineness that coats everything and I appreciate the honesty and respect it shows for the material and not making it seem like a one joke is going to follow the other as our protagonist gets into zany misadventures.


    DANNY THE DOG (2005) Director:Louis Leterrier
    Cast:Morgan Freeman, Jet Li, Bob Hoskins, Kerry Condon, Christian Gazio, Silvio Simac
    Release:TBA 2005
    Synopsis:This is the story of Danny (Li), a slave who has lived his whole life without any sort of normal human education, with the mind and personality of a young child, with only one lesson learned: how to fight. Treated like a dog by his owner/boss, Bart (Hoskins) which includes having to wear a collar, Danny has been raised to be a lethal fighting machine who fights in illegal gladiator-style fight clubs, where he earns lots of money for Bart as the undisputed champion. After a car accident that lands Bart in a coma, however, Danny meets a kind elderly blind piano tuner (Freeman) on the run because he knows secrets some bad guys don’t want known, who uses music to teach Danny some things about the world and about being human.
    View Trailer:
    * Medium (Real Player)

    Prognosis: This deserves a Jeff Spicoli “Awesome. Totally Awesome.” This movie, even if you’re a marginal fan of Jet Li, looks like it could make up for THE ONE and LEATHAL WEAPON 4. With interest.

    Not even slated to come out until 2005, this trailer for DANNY THE DOG fires on all cylinders and does not relent until the very end. With a soundtrack that’s partly Massive Attack and a visual style closer to a grittier, dirtier FIGHT CLUB, you can’t help but to feel excited watching this thing unfold. Since it’s hard to keep track of all the imagery going on (this thing seriously needs some Ritalin in some places) I’ll just break down the most vivid images.

    There are images of a collar with the name Danny written in the back of it and it looks metallic, heavy. There’s a flash of a house, a piano, and the same weighty collar coming unlocked. Bob Hoskins, looking sharp in his suit and attitude, Massive Attack establishes a sonic foothold, walks with great possession of self through a dirty door. A close-up of him fades as the visage of a buff gimp (clad with even the mask) crushes a block of something with his head as Li and he go after each other. Cut to guys in suits, standing, in suits and ties, outside and in a straight line, firing automatic weaponry. Cut back to Jet Li delivering a punch to the face of the gimp as a stream of blood spills out the front.

    The gimp falls.

    Hoskins in a white suit appears, money is produced, and the collar is shown once more. Jet Li is now in an empty pool, kicking the veritable crap, snot, life out of some soft bitches who kneel before his Zod-ness. From out of nowhere, as if there’s even a somewhere to speak of in this thing, there’s an image a mother holding a baby and a piano. Morgan Freeman shows up.

    This is when you get to relax and take a break.

    Jet Li sits at a piano as Morgan Freeman saddles up next to the man who could easily turn his neck into a bow tie. Morgan asks Jet if he likes pianos. It’s hard for Jet to get the word out as the trailer starts to evolve into something else; something sweet enough that it reminds me of LEON. There’s a cute girl who tries to befriend Jet, spilling her life story to him, and us, at a breakneck pace. She mentions her parents died in a car wreck and there is a cool visual interjection of two cars crashing with awesome velocity. The girl kisses his cheek. Jet stammers to get out the fact his name is Danny. Then the collar comes back into play.

    Discordant images flicker on the screen as Jet hugs Morgan and you are left with the sense that whatever goes down, and it seems that Hoskins is the living, breathing brother of Don Logan from SEXY BEAST, it will be fantastically bloody and violent. Not since Sloth from the GOONIES entered my life nearly two decades ago has the idea of having a man-pet turned into a device for muscle to get one’s way and defend those who would otherwise be defenseless been better realized.

    It should come as no surprise that Luc Besson had a hand in writing this thing. Also, the guy who directed THE TRANSPORTER is the one behind the lens. Let us quietly hope that things stay as dark as they are here and don’t turn into a homogenized actioneer. Something very powerful is going on in this trailer.


    WE DON’T LIVE HERE ANYMORE (2004) Director:John Curran
    Cast:Mark Ruffalo, Laura Dern, Peter Krause, Naomi Watts, Sam Charles, Haili Page, Jennifer Bishop
    Release: August 13, 2004 (Limited)
    Synopsis:Mark Ruffalo, Laura Dern, Peter Krause and Naomi Watts star in the story of two couples in a New England college town whose lives become inextricably intertwined and turned upside-down in a tide of passion, heartbreak, humor and deceit. The film is directed by John Curran from a screenplay by Larry Gross, based on two short stories by Andre Dubus II (In the Bedroom).
    View Trailer:
    * Small (Quick Time)

    Prognosis: Positive. Quiet suburban life. A guitar plucks gently in the background.

    Terry and Jack

    There’s Laura Dern, looking as about as average-pretty as you would find a woman, and there’s also Mark Ruffalo, donning scraggly facial hair and is joshing around with his kids. There is a dinner party, the hallmark of true married life, and it mutely goes on while everyone enjoys their good spirits, fine wine, and quiet conversations. Cut to Mark then playing a little catch with the young’uns on his wonderfully kempt front yard.

    Edith and Frank

    Cheers to Nate Fisher himself, Peter Krause. A glass of champagne is raised in his honor. He kisses his wife, Naomi Watts. Life is fairly vanilla sweet for him.

    How can we make things interesting? By making these men self-implode, that’s how.

    In the next scene Jack and Frank are scoping out some bar boo-tay as Krause, after cruising the ass of some woman, tells Ruffalo to love everybody you can; kids, wife, then once, just once, try someone else just because it feels good. It’s right here, as if pinpointing the epicenter of the volcanic eruption that will surely kill them all, that Naomi Watts enters the literal picture and I’m so clear on Krause’s philosophy; I am a full fledged member of that man club mantra.

    Of course, it should go without saying that Watts and Ruffalo hook up.

    There’s some audio of Mark asking if he should stop with the whole coveting another man’s wife thing, twice he does this, and all I can think is “um”¦no, actually. You should continue the lies and deception until we all get a money shot off from Watts and only then are you allowed to stop, Dumbass.”

    Krause and Ruffalo verbally tête-à-tête each other as one parries with a behavioral misstep here, going home with the other man’s wife there. Naomi does an impromptu dance with the luckiest leaf in the world as Mark seems bent on driving whatever happy home and family he had straight into the earth. For those who enjoyed his underwear scenes in ETERNAL SUNSHINE OF THE SPOTLESS MIND there’s a copious amount of chest hair on display for all your human sweater needs; it almost veers into hazardous Robin Williams’ territory and you can’t help but feel that someone should have at least offered to Epilady that thatch.

    So, by the time we understand we’ve got some adulterous wife swapping going on we understand that even the kids know what’s going on and all that we get at the end is Dern, on the verbal edge of breaking down into hysterics, says how she’d like everything back the way it was; she wants her husband, life, children, all pieced back together again. Sorry to be a killjoy here but this film looks like to have a train wreck ending that I am eager to look at and admire.

    Remember fellas, even though you have a Dern at home, no matter tempting the Watts, you’ve got to just let it go. You’ll only end up a cinematic cliché which is most certainly how things will turn out here. Although, for Watts, I might consider drinking heavily, hitting it like an Ike and Tina Turner Saturday Night Fight, and simply transfer my guilt onto the booze. It could work. I would make it work.

    Now, a serious note about the man who wrote the original story this movie is based off of: Andre Dubus. The man was a legendary storyteller and his subjects were usually men and women who found themselves at their very worst. He wrote some of literature’s best short stories in the 20th century, his work was adapted for 2001’s hug fest, IN THE BEDROOM, and was renowned for his inability to keep a marriage together; he was twice divorced and had six kids to try and tell him he wasn’t a complete fuck-up. So, his pain is your gain in this Cinderella tale of enchantment and infidelity.


    GINGER SNAPS III (2004) Director: Grant Harvey
    Cast: Emily Perkins, Katharine Isabelle, Nathaniel Arcand
    Release: September 7, 2004
    Synopsis: Set in 19th Century Canada, Brigette and her sister Ginger take refuge in a Traders’ Fort which later becomes under siege by some savage werewolves. And an enigmatic Indian hunter decides to help the girls, but one of the girls has been bitten by a werewolf. Brigitte and Ginger may have no one to turn to but themselves.
    View Trailer:
    * Medium (Quick Time)

    Prognosis: Negative, because I won’t see it in theaters. Positive, because I’ll want to rent it as soon as it comes out. Some slightly lesbonic werewolves? I’ll be right there.

    The first image we get off this trailer is of an open forest. It’s wide with tall trees and sunlight breaks through the branches. The ground is snowy, twisted roots shoot out horizontally. A dream catcher (standard issue for every idiot in the Southwest with a pick-up truck or an AMC Pacer.) hangs outstretched. As the images of a pristine forest roll slowly by I think one thought: where the hell are the werewolves?

    Cut to some Scot, wearing a beret with a fuzzy dingleberry on top of it, stands at the entrance to a door with a rifle. Two women struggle to make it through an archway that seems to lead to a desolate town square. We see the ladies, pale and slightly lifeless, hobble though a male gauntlet made up of Friar Tuck who looks like he stole Wolverine’s sideburns, a rifleman who looks like a lost member of The Hives, an Indian who looks ready to open a sixer of whoop-ass on any pale face looking to talk smack about firewater or peyote, and we get a quick look at a dude who I swear is the identical twin of that impish twerp from TANGO AND CASH who framed Stallone and Russell based on faked audio tapes but those guys went back and settled the score, big time, though. Before I can seriously contemplate whether it was or was the twerp, a flash of the titular flesh eating monster quickly juts into focus and is gone just as fast. Some feasting goes on, one of the chicks admits that something bit her (Ooo”¦bet you don’t know where that little Information Nugget will lead), and before I can start paying attention on any one thing, as this trailer is spinning faster than a drunken carnie behind the power switch for the Tilt-A-Whirl, two chicks are making out with each other in a hallway. (Cue slow Saxaphone).

    After I rewind a few times we next get another woman into the mix who is holding a dagger, looking like a neo-suburban Goth who wants to “look the part” by dressing up in blankets and applying thick white foundation. Next, ol’ Friar Tuck himself starts telling somebody (ah, who the hell cares at this point) about sinfulness as one of the original pair of women is drenched in blood as she lay in bed, there’s a flash of a white face with spatters of blood on it, maggots swimming in blood, our Indian hero is killing something that wants to fight back, a dude is ready to kill someone with a hatchet, a woman holds two torches at once as she twists around like Indy in a snake-filled room, Indian man gets a dead-on hit against an invading werewolf, and then all hell is unleashed as every last remaining moment is filled with how this outpost in the middle of nowhere defends itself against a werewolf invasion. We do, though, get more pictures of bloody maggots, so that’s nice. I would go on to explain exactly what else in this thing but, suffice to say, it’s chockfull of violence, lesbians (two chicks at the same time kissing makes them honorary members no matter what), and fire; you can put aside any feelings about how terrible this movie is going to be as long as those three things are still in there at the end. Further confirming my suspicions is that the guy directing the film did a movie called AMERICAN BEER a few years ago. AMERICAN BEER. Something tells me this flick is mere inches away from the direct-to-video market. Great trailer, though.


    RAY (2004) Director: Taylor Hackford
    Cast: Jamie Foxx, Regina King, Kerry Washington, Curtis Armstrong
    Release: October 29, 2004
    Synopsis: Born in a poor African American town in central Florida, Ray Charles went blind at the age of 7. With the staunch support of his determined single mother, he developed the fierce resolve, wit and incredible talent that would eventually enable him to overcome not only Jim Crow Racism and the cruel prejudices against the blind, but also discover his own sound which revolutionized American popular music. Nonetheless, as Ray’s unprecedented fame grew, so did his weakness for drugs and women, until they threatened to strip away the very things he held most dear. This little known story of Ray Charles’ meteoric rise from humble beginnings, his successful struggle to excel in a sighted world and his eventual defeat of his own personal demons make for an inspiring and unforgettable true story of human triumph.
    View Trailer:
    * Medium (Windows Media, Quick Time)

    Prognosis: So positive, I went out and bought a Ray Charles CD. Damn, if that wasn’t one of the better trailers I’ve seen in months.

    I can’t tell you how inexorably Ray Charles is connected to my film consciousness. From his spectacular showmanship in the BLUES BROTHERS to the music playing as a soundtrack for the comedic goings-on as Del O’Griffith tries to steer a station wagon with his crotch in PLANES, TRAINS AND AUTOMOBILES with Mess Around playing on the car stereo and to the more muted moments of “Georgia” playing in a scene from Quantum Leap that I’ll never soon forget, Ray was music. He embodied soul and its essence.

    I know the easy joke here, and probably when people go to review it later, to look at Jaime Foxx and bag on his obvious lack of movie credibility. It would be so easy to joke about it that it might cloud some judgments that will not see how his performance here needs to be seen out of the purview of all those other craptastic pieces of cinematic puke. I am not a fan but, man, this trailer stirs something inside if you simply let it.

    I’m not sure if it was the music, the direction or the amazing supporting cast but there is really nothing I could say that would make me believe that this trailer didn’t deliver on all the major points.

    This thing opens up and Ray is a kid. He isn’t yet blind as he looks up into a scraggly tree. Its branches are bare save for a dozen colored bottles hanging from its frail fingers and his mother lets him, and us, know he is on his way to losing his sight. He’s taught piano before his world darkens and the next thing we know, or are let to see, is Ray taking the stage in what is, ostensibly, one of his first gigs. He knocks over the chair that sits in front of the piano; people find it amusing, and then the opening electric piano bars of “What’d I Say” start in. The screen gets smoky and you can feel the forward momentum of this thing.

    Foxx is shown as quite the ladies man, wooing a young woman at a restaurant, as scenes from his recording days flash by. Lest you think it’s just Foxx carrying this movie, Dudley “Booger” Dawson, Curtis Armstrong for those not in the know, appears on screen as a confidant to Ray. Clips from Ray’s nightclub days play quickly, but not frenetic, and we’re given sound bites just to make sure everyone is on the same page when it comes to his accomplishments. He was the first one to meld R&B and gospel and, at one time, he was rivaling Frank Sinatra with the kind of recording clout he possessed.

    Of course, there were some downsides. Foxx is shown freaking out in a bathroom, the pure white light from the outside spilling onto the screen, as his addiction to drugs gets out of control and threatens to topple every last thing he had created. There are the moments of violence, the overwhelming celebrity he was thrust into and we’re given the feeling that even though he was adored by so many he was always alone in the dark behind those glasses.

    The man directing behind the lens, Taylor Hackford, has made some great, and not great, flicks. He was the one who gave me a consistent way to annunciate “Mayo”¦Naise” through Louis Gossett Jr. in OFFICER AND A GENTLEMAN but he was also the one responsible for inflicting the pain that was PROOF OF LIFE on us all a few years back. Since this film doesn’t have a whimpering, simpering, whining, crying, hysterical Meg Ryan I’m feeling like we’ll be safe on that front.

    July 16, 2004

    Trailer Park: Double Dip

    Filed under: Columns,Trailer Park — admin @ 5:01 pm

    E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES

    By Christopher Stipp

    July 16, 2004

    DOUBLE DIP

    One thing I noticed as the Cubs (GO Cubs!) rallied for one win against the Cardinals in last Sunday’s night game on ESPN was the recurring commercial for the new BOURNE SUPREMACY flick. It was great. Every commercial break they had I had the chance to see it again, and again, and again, and again, and again, but I noticed something tacked on to the end of the trailer. Universal was using some time after the trailer finished to pimp its new double dipped DVD edition of the BOURNE IDENTITY. Now, I don’t mind that they were doing it, I didn’t mind it when they re-released THE MUMMY on DVD, but it is interesting to that the way the studio could get you to part with some more of your cash is to bribe you with a coupon to see the new film. It worked for me on the JAY AND SILENT BOB SOUNDTRACK as I believe I saved five bucks on my admission price for that film and would’ve seen the movie anyway, but I was able to see THE MUMMY RETURNS for free (theoretically speaking) and now, if I wanted, I could see the new Damon film for free as well. Since I didn’t really need a new version of the DVD (did the flick even necessitate a double dip?) I instead want to applaud Universal (the people behind all three promotions) for their unique approach on how to make the sting of buying another copy of the film a little easier. Most studios wouldn’t care one way or another but in these times of Customer noService, it’s nice to see a half-hearted attempt to sweeten the deal for many people who would otherwise just say no. I own a few double dips in my collection and I can’t recall ever feeling as good about myself for being a hapless sucker as I did when I felt I was getting something out of the deal. Now, if Universal could stop playing the trailer so damn much I would really appreciate it. If only Budweiser would make some more of those Real Men of Genius spots.

    In a 360 degree turn, and on a total and different paranoia tip, the link I provide below for the new SAINTS AND SOLDIERS trailer is different than the one at the official site. Usually no one would even care but I just thought I would point out that the official site wants you to enter an email address and a zip code, plus, they want you to verify you’re older than 13 before the trailer even plays. I know most of you geezers are older than 13 but, as a public service, I am not willing to send you anywhere or to any site where you have to give up personal info. Most of you may never click the little blue link to see these things but I feel this is a misguided attempt to get some useless information. Marketing, target demographics aside, who really cares about my email address and zip code? Are you personally going to screen the film in my town if I give it up enough times? I’ll create a bot that will put in all sorts of assorted names if that’s the case, but I know it’s for no other reason than to have one more thing to delete. I’d sooner just send you people elsewhere to get a peek at this beautifully constructed trailer. Can someone lend me hand off this soap box? Thanks.

    I hope you like the sampling this week as we have a little for every taste. A DIRTY SHAME is definitely one for the record books. It is completely perverse and should be welcomed by you all. If there is any questions or comments about the validity of what I believe is the truth about all the trailers that follow, send me a note. Now, on with the show and tell.


    BRIDGET JONES: EDGE OF REASON (2004) Director:Beeban Kidron
    Cast:Renée Zellweger, Colin Firth, Hugh Grant, Jacinda Barrett, Jim Broadbent
    Release: November 19, 2004
    Synopsis:The story picks up four weeks after the first film, and already Bridget Jones is becoming uncomfortable in her relationship with Mark Darcy. Apart from discovering that he’s a conservative voter, she has to deal with a new boss, strange contractor, and the worst vacation of her life.
    View Trailer:
    * Medium (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Negative. Hmm…smash my head repeatedly with a ball-pean hammer or see the new BRIDGET JONES movie?

    Yes friends, and by friends I mean any person who has a significant other who doesn’t pay attention to movies 364 other days of the year yet finds the energy to get excited over this film, the chubby blonde is back in full effect.

    Ok, likeability confession. I will do this like tearing off a band-aid that rests comfortably across my gooch: IlikedthefirstoneandevenowntheDVDofit. I was a fan of the cream puffery of it all, and appreciated the light humor that Colin and Hugh brought to the film. I liked that Renee put on a few pounds and still looked great which just helped to being some authenticity to the story. It was amusing enough for me to let it through the doors of my home. This sequel, however, doesn’t yet look like a guilty pleasure I can yet get secretly excited over seeing. What we do have here, though, seems more like a press kit showcasing Zellweger. It’s not a completely destructive thing, mind you, but there does seem like there’s unduly attention given to just her.

    “70 shags…6 glorious weeks.”

    The short trailer starts off with “Lovin’ You” with some active silhouettes of a few blurred out naked people, but it’s tastefully done in a Vaseline on the camera lens sort of way, as Renee gives a ring hello to her man. The odd thing about this moment is that Colin just flippantly asks if everything is all right with his lady, opening the door for most anything, who then proceeds to tell him that she’s just getting over a “rather graphic shag flashback” fantasy she was having moments earlier but, before she stops there, also mentions he has a great bum.

    “Right,” Colin dryly says, “I’m just with the Mexican ambassador right at the moment along with the head for Amnesty International…and you’re on speakerphone.”

    Whoa! This is the moment in the trailer your lady or guy friend (hey, we all have our proclivities) starts laughing as you secretly hope they choke on their buttered kernels of mediocrity. I don’t know about you but I know when I’m on speakerphone, I know it. I guess, however, this is what counts as par on this course.

    From the initial setup gag we get a sign on the screen that says “SHE’S BACK” but then it goes to a headshot of Renee looking right at the camera and it lingers too long for me; it’s like one of those paintings that has eyes that follow you anywhere in the room. It just needs to go away.

    “Ever thought about doing it in the dark with a complete stranger?”

    Hugh Grant. He has charisma, no doubt, and is one of the best reasons to see a movie like this. Save for his comments about the “giant panties,” a recognition of the first film that most people who want to see the sequel will squeal in delight that they actually remember what he’s referring to, it’s just good to see someone else in the trailer.

    I’m sorry, not really but it makes me sound sensitive, but I was thankful for the cessation of this trailer if to only stop seeing Renee’s smiling, preening face. I am hopeful they fashion something realistic for Bridget, but I do know, in all likelihood, one of the players will be running through the streets of London to the sound of an up-tempo Motown song as they try to convince the other they made a huge mistake and won’t they be with them for the rest of their life. It’s here where the general public all smile and clap but that’s the exact nexus point where I wish an IRA extremist group sets off a bomb near them, sending shrapnel everywhere. I’m holding out hope, though.


    SAINTS AND SOLDIERS (2004) Director:Ryan Little
    Cast:Corbin Allred, Larry Bagby, Kirby Heyborne, Peter Asle Holden, Alexander Polinsky
    Release:August 6, 2004
    Synopsis:Five American soldiers fighting in Europe during World War II are separted from U.S. forces during the historic Malmedy Massacre. Most of their fellow soldiers are slaughtered by German forces, leaving them stranded and without support behind enemy lines.
    View Trailer:
    * Medium (Quick Time)

    Prognosis: Positive. I haven’t seen one episode of Band of Brothers.

    Maybe I was busy for those 10 weeks, maybe it was because I didn’t have TiVo at the time to keep up with the serial nature of the series, but I know it was supposed to be this grandiose homage to some of the men who fought in WWII. But, then again, I did digest SAVING PRIVATE RYAN, ENEMY AT THE GATES, SCHINDLERS LIST, U-571, DAS BOOT, multiple Looney Tunes where Bugs goes up against that Japanese fellow and the list goes on and on with films and shows that use World War II as a backdrop. There obviously is a market for movie after movie that showcase this specific time period in global history and I guess wars have a way of doing that. SAINTS AND SOLDIERS is about as indie as you can get for a film in a genre like the war picture and it looks appealing for numerous reasons.

    What you notice right away as the trailer unfolds is a radio voice that speaks over the action on the screen. It’s snowy, looks cold, and we get a German soldier trudging through it all with his trusty machine gun (one I can honestly say was integral in my defeat of many a Nazi platoon in my tour of duty in playing Medal of Honor on Playstation 2) as the voice tells us that American soldiers were captured, and promptly shot, by their German captors. We see a battlefield with dead American bodies everywhere. There’s a slight bit of chaos as a different cadre of men, truly behind enemy lines, the throaty action movie voice over guy taking over tension control for the rest of the trailer, try to find their way to safety. Now, here’s where things get a little murky.

    We’re shown some great forest-in-the-winter shots of crap blowing up, sending up dark pieces of soil everywhere (it somehow makes for great cinematography every time), and then we get the back of some dude’s head who’s explaining that he has information that needs to get back to HQ before it’s too late. Before you scream out “I know how it’s gonna end!” the execution of this trailer shows some truly engaging action scenes that also incorporates some good reasons why this movie should be sought out and not dismissed as yet another chapter in the pantheon of these kinds of films.

    After the setup, and right before the minute mark of this roughly two and a half minute trailer, the story is in motion and it then all becomes about the action. There’s an RPG that’s launched, a grenade (always a trusty WWII weapon stand-by) that’s tossed, but then things get creative. A guy stands against a blue sky as a plane slices the screen ever so slightly, some feet creep very gently over a darkened floor, we get one of the soldiers crying like a little girl, a damaged doll lay on the ground in serious disrepair, a German has one of the soldiers dead-to-rights but doesn’t shoot because one is a medic, and then there’s the ubiquitous scroll of how many awards this thing has won.

    Throaty action voice over guy steps back in to tell us there’s a time for courage and a time for greatness and that there is a time for heroes. The sounds of the soft trumpet in the background is, quite literally, pitch perfect. The best part of this film, and this is fact, you can check my calculator, is that since there is not really anyone in this movie of any great celebrity each one is a possible target that could be picked off at any time.


    SILVER CITY (2004) Director: Michael Winterbottom
    Cast: Maria Bello, Thora Birch, Chris Cooper, Alma Delfina, Richard Dreyfuss, Miguel Ferrer, Daryl Hannah, Danny Huston, Kris Kristofferson, Tim Roth, Ralph Waite, Billy Zane
    Release:September
    Synopsis:The latest John Sayles film follows Dickie Pilager (Chris Cooper) the grammatically-challenged, “user-friendly” candidate during his Colorado campaign to win office. Set against the backdrop of a mythic “New West,” SILVER CITY is a film that is equal parts scathing political lampoon and sun-stunned neo-noir detective story. When Pilager finds that he’s reeled in a corpse during the taping of an environmental political ad, his ferocious campaign manager, Chuck Raven (Richard Dreyfuss), hires former idealistic journalist turned rumpled private detective Danny O’Brien (Danny Huston) to investigate potential links between the corpse and the Pilager family’s enemies. In the tradition of the great films noir, Danny’s investigation pulls him deeper and deeper into a complex web of influence and corruption, involving high stakes lobbyists, media conglomerates, environmental plunderers, and undocumented migrant workers.
    View Trailer:
    * Small, Medium (Quick Time, Windows Media)

    Prognosis: Semi-Positive. I’m having a hard time with this one.

    I’m usually not stumped but this one has come quite close. I don’t know why, as the plot is so easy to understand: An election year governor hopeful reels in a corpse during the taping of an environmental ad. His campaign manager hires a detective to investigate potential links between the corpse and his political enemies and the results of the investigation ultimately reveal a complex web of high-powered influence and corruption.

    It’s not so easy to digest, or maybe too easy to digest if I can say that, that I think is the problem with this trailer.

    When you have, in a plot synopsis, that the gubernatorial man in question is a “grammatically-challenged, ‘user-friendly’ candidate” and an opening for the trailer that has Chris Cooper (always a solid addition to any cast of any film) starring as a nameless politico, sounding much like the current American president (it’s hilarious to watch Cooper just run with the moment), things start to blur between art and real life. We see in the trailer that Cooper is about as lost inside his own mind as his handler, played by Richard Dreyfus, is ruthlessly conniving to simply guide his client in the direction he wants. We have, on the other side of the group who wants Cooper to win, a few people (spearheaded by Tim Roth and Thora Birch, one’s a great acting talent and the other has, um, two great acting talents. Wink wink, nudge nudge.) who are looking to investigate Cooper and find out if his armor has any chinks.

    The setup for the dead body, which unleashes a moment of vitriolic anger from Cooper’s mouth, is put into motion as we also get the appearance of Danny Huston (who starred in a pivotal role as Barman #2 in LEAVING LAS VEGAS) who is the ringleader looking into Silver City, a development that needs some looking into that feels awfully close to the Whitewater scandal. Huston seems to be the Bob Woodward of the film as he is trying to tie the many names together he has on a dry erase board, which has important looking arrows that obviously crisscross to show his sharp, akita-like detective skills. Greed (“It’s like a treasure chest waiting to be opened), Corruption (“There’s no reason you couldn’t raise the river and lower the bridge at the same time”), Deception (“There’s a lot more to this than some illegal alien floating in the lake”), are all shown as words on the screen before going to the sound bites of one of the players looking very astute and intelligent give their lines with muted seriousness.

    The fact of the matter is, as I finished this trailer is: Do I want to pay money for a satire that I already see unfolding on the evening news? Is this a preaching to the choir kind of film? If it is art then what is it saying about politics in America today that, again, the average person doesn’t already know? I am a little turned around about the aim of this film and I would be interested to hear from anyone about the implications for a movie like this. BULLWORTH was crap, WAG THE DOG was a little less obfuscating, but is there really any good political satires in the open market that don’t require a Ritalin drip to get through with their will to live in tact? Maybe this could be the one.

    And yes, another reason to be interested in this film: Billy Zane. I do believe there is nothing else that needs to be said on that issue.


    RESIDENT EVIL: APOCALYPSE (2004) Director: Alexander Witt
    Cast: Milla Jovovich, Eric Mabius, Sienna Guillory, Oded Fehr, Thomas Kretschmann, Jared Harris, Mike Epps
    Release: September 10, 2004
    Synopsis: The sequel to the $100 million hit Resident Evil: Apocalypse is again based on the wildly popular video game series and picks up where the first film ended. Alice (Jovovich) returns to Raccoon City and joins forces with Jill Valentine (Guillory) and Carlos Oliviera (Fehr) to eliminate the deadly virus that threatens to make every human being undead”¦ and to seek justice. Since being captured by the Umbrella Corporation, Alice has been subjected to biogenic experimentation and has become genetically altered, with superhuman strengths, senses and dexterity. These skills, and more, will be needed if anyone is to remain alive.
    View Trailer:
    * Small, Medium (Quick Time, Windows Media)

    Prognosis: Negative, but in a good way. To any young man, aged 11 to 18: see this film. It’s the kind of picture you and your buddies would want to check out anyway and I’m sure as hell MARIA FULL OF GRACE isn’t on your cinematic To-Do list.

    To the rest of you, however, this may come as no surprise: the movie looks like it will be a minor genre success and it will no doubt make huge money in the ancillary DVD market. You will be deluged in ads, six months after the film’s release, to buy the DVD director’s cut, possibly a double platter worth of shite, and it’s most likely, somehow, going to end up in your collection. Why? Best as I can tell there was a vacuum that was created so long ago when I COME IN PEACE came and went. The world needed a B-movie star, a new Dolph Lundgren, and it’s Milla Jovovich. Sure, Milla has the kind of acting talent that could be best used as silent wife #1, caressing her husband’s thigh, in a Viagra ad on TV but there seems to be a volatile mix of lackadaisical directing (everything is so clear, crisp and unwrinkled that I believe I’m looking at a movie set. Imagine that.), bad dialogue, but has some worthy effects that seem to make it a disappointment more than anything else; a far worse fate for a film than it being wholly terrible.

    I will give kudos, though, where it’s due and I stand by my previous assertions on the teaser trailer that ran a few months ago which simply was a fake ad that pretended to be a real. It was simple, direct, slightly unnerving, and was great in every regard. This version, though, shows a little too much. We get Milla acting like she’s some badass, which is fine, but when you start to throw down your one-liners in the trailer and they smell as bad as Jack Black’s jock after a grueling workout on the Stairmaster 7000? Things don’t look so good.

    The opening, without a doubt, pulled me in and I eagerly anticipated seeing some footage that would pull me in further into this fictitious realm, at the very least. Alexander Witt didn’t disappoint with a quick shot of a girl, floating in light blue water brine, her hair just floating delicately around her face and then, watch-out, the eyes flicker open. Then, after a semi-presidential motorcade winds its way through the very same neighborhood streets that I believe were used as an understudy for those used in DAWN OF THE DEAD, we get a man in a wheelchair. He mumbles something incoherent or unrelated, I’m still not sure, but I do know we get a cool nuclear blast wave that goes off in the middle of the city. I have to admit, just like a good flaming arrow, I appreciate a good blast wave going off. It somehow creates the notion of mass destruction on a sinister scale and I can come aboard that kind of vision and stand behind it.

    We then get some chaos of the general public variety, some screaming, yelling, and then, like a gift from above, we see that the guy from the MUMMY movies that had the thing on his face is in this film and I am back into it. Ooo”¦we get a shot of the zombie/monster things. At this point I am still grooving on the trailer, but then, like a bad acid flashback of the album cover for Meatloaf’s “Bat out of Hell” we get Milla riding her motorbike through a stained glass window with nary a speckle or shard of the colored stuff on her person. By the way: where do these people get the ramps that launch them so high into things like windows and second story offices?

    Then, we get the monster of the film carrying a frickin’ bazooka like it’s Arnold frickin’ Schwarzenegger, launching a load for fun into the air. What the hell is this all about? Monsters that care about modern warfare and weaponry? I thought they just are supposed to grunt and eat the living flesh off people. Oh yeah, the zombies in this film that are really supposed to be citizens who were turned into zombies? Take one look and try to convince me the budget for zombie effects just didn’t consist of people dipping their faces into ashtrays. Now, suffice to say, I really did like the generic hardcore rock and roll music in the background as crap is either blown up or shot up. Again, I’m just being honest and giving things a fair shot. Milla seems to be wielding these weapons with great precision but I cannot, in good faith, recommend this trailer as holding any promise whatsoever of being a fully enjoyable zombie/actioneer. Maybe if she got it in her head to go down the route of silent action star, not that THE FIFTH ELEMENT wasn’t the most bizarre visual puke ever to be put to celluloid, she might fare a little better on my list of B-list stars. If she were to tap into the same thing that made her good in DAZED AND CONFUSED? I could see a multi-picture deal with Van Damme, Steven Segal or Mark Dacascos for Blockbuster Video’s Youth Restricted Viewing line.


    A DIRTY SHAME (2004) Director:John Waters
    Cast:Tracey Ullman, Chris Isaak, Johnny Knoxville, Selma Blair
    Release: September 24, 2004
    Synopsis: A DIRTY SHAME stars Tracey Ullman as a blue-collar convenience store owner who suffers a concussion and experiences carnal lust she cannot control.
    View Trailer:
    * Large (Quick Time)

    Prognosis: Way Positive. I think one of my favorite Kids in the Hall sketches has to be the one about the Sex Girl Patrol. It behooves me to explain further but, in a nutshell, it deals with three girls who incite “sexual horniness” in absolutely everything they come across. It was as hilarious in that regard as I am feeling the notion of someone whose libido is out of control is going to be here.

    First of all, any trailer that tells me, in its own green, little way, that it’s rated NC-17 for pervasive sexual content I am all eyes and ears.

    Here’s the play-by-play:

    Gritty, voice over guy tells us “something’s wrong on Harvard Row.” It looks like an idyllic suburban community with lush grass, big trees and a real down home vibe. Chris Isaac is playing grab ass with Tracy Ullman who doesn’t seem in the mood for reciprocating. Out of nowhere, as is the case for most John Waters movies, we get some really old people making out as they stand on a sidewalk as Tracy looks on from her car. Disgusted, she is also witness to some gay innuendo that seems to stem from some new bear-ish members of her community as they unload a moving van in front of their home. However, it is Ray Ray, played by Johnny Knoxville that is fingered as the person responsible for “threatening the very limits of family tolerance.”

    “Perverts are taking over this neighborhood,” “Let’s go sexin’,” are just some of the bon mots that are tossed around like water balloons before we get the gist that Tracy, who seems the most sexually repressed woman in town, becomes the town whore after a whack on the old melon.

    We next get a look at Selma Blair and her abnormally rotund and girthy prosthetic breasts (they are wicked huge) which are dressed, most appropriately, to match the slutty look of her character. Tracy Ullman, though, looks fabulous. I don’t think I’ve laughed quite so hard this week as when she asks Chris Issac, coming on to him in their station wagon, thrusting her pelvis in his direction, if he feels, “like yodeling in a canyon.”

    “My name is Ray Ray and I’m here to service you.”

    Something I don’t see everyday, as if Selma wasn’t enough, is the full frontal shot of John Waters, who is introduced as the director of HAIRSPRAY and PINK FLAMINGOS, dressed nicely in his suit and donning his trademark pencil thin moustache. It’s a bold move that perfectly suits the film it’s schilling.

    From that moment on there it’s just a bunch of crazy scenes slapped together in the most bizarre fashion. Not only do you get Johnny Knoxville flapping his tongue like he’s trying out for a position as understudy for Gene Simmons, you also get a shot of a guy licking a tire (sorry, Drew Barrymore made licking a steering wheel slightly hotter to me), and, for all the pervs in the audience, you get Selma Blair actively running with those cans strapped to her chest, plus, you get a shot of her in her underwear. It’s bizarre but, for John Waters, it is an absolute home run.

    And, lest you think this trailer is finished, you get Tracy, one more time, and a roomful of senior citizens doing the hokey pokey. It would have been a fairly innocuous moment had there not been a liter of water tossed in her direction by a looker-on. Tracy catches it, promptly stands it upright in the middle of the floor, and gets situated to, well, envelope it; the resulting shot of horror on the face of grandma and the nearly empty bottle of water spinning on the ground as the trailer fades out was well worth the price of admission here.

    July 9, 2004

    Trailer Park: And Where, And Where, Is The Batman?

    Filed under: Columns,Trailer Park — admin @ 5:00 pm

    E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES

    By Christopher Stipp

    July 9, 2004

    AND WHERE, AND WHERE, IS THE BATMAN?

    I absolutely hated having to time my movie-going a few years back to sneak into a theater I knew was playing the new STAR WARS trailer. The movie it was attached to was not what I wanted to spend my money on and I sure as hell didn’t want to completely ruin an evening and be a really sad sack nerdite by seeing the thing and leaving. I did manage to catch it before my intended film started that very same weekend and since then I have noticed studios doing this every so often, attaching anticipated trailers with films that aren’t worth going to see in the first place, which brings me to CATWOMAN.

    While speculation ran rampant that the new trailer for BATMAN BEGINS was going to show before SPIDER-MAN 2 (a move that would’ve ensured at least a couple hundred eyes, depending on which box office figures you believe, would’ve seen it) it was all for naught as word has it that it will now be attached to CATWOMAN. Now, I really don’t want to sound negative, even though it is funnier than all hell to see Halle Berry acting like a complete buffoon as she displays her “catisms” (the hissing, the curious eyeballing of the Jaguar hood ornament, the landing on all fours, and even the bullwhipping, I find all really entertaining), but the truth is that the film really isn’t a strong draw. I don’t care what figures the studio heads are looking at or what the tracking tells them but every word I’ve read has pointed to danger. I could be mistaken. I hope for WB’s sake, I am. Now, with BATMAN BEGINS, a movie that stands to be an inch or two better than this female “revision” of DC’s female version of Batman, is in peril of becoming associated with CATWOMAN, a movie people will see as a quasi-BATMAN sequel. From what you and I know about the general public, they will not know what many have already committed to memory in the years as fans have followed the series. Now the question remains: is this trailer attachment a way to generate interest in another BAT property for next year and will likely be regarded as a positive or negative thing by the kind of reception CATWOMAN gets or is this a last ditch attempt to get you to fork over your dough, like a company looking to double dip into your pocketbook with another EVIL DEAD DVD box set, to help inflate the bottom line for this film’s first weekend in release before the trailer eventually hits the Internet? Both true? Neither? Enquiring minds”¦

    I could be just an alarmist who is bitter and has to rearrange his schedule, should the trailer not be released on the Internet the same day as CATWOMAN’S release, just to see a glimpse of Christopher Nolan’s vision of a newer, slightly less embarrassing, caped crusader. CATWOMAN possibly break new box office records. From the cheap seats here, however, it just doesn’t look that way.

    In other news, I hope you dig this week’s fare. I included a few bombs into the mix of interesting trailers I saw this week. Most notably, the new film from Pauly Shore (no, he’s not dead) looks like a better time than JURY DUTY and a very, very, tiny film by the name of NOI ALBINOI nearly made clip of the week but was edged out by Joel Schumacher’s dark vision for PHANTOM OF THE OPERA. Besides, anything with Phantoms in the title has gotta be the bomb, yo.


    TAXI (2004) Director:Tim Story
    Cast: Queen Latifah, Jimmy Fallon, Ann-Margret, Gisele Bundchen, Henry Simmons, Jennifer Esposito
    Release: October 8, 2004
    Synopsis: Queen Latifah and Jimmy Fallon team up in this non-stop action-comedy. Latifah is New York’s fastest cabbie whose skills behind the wheel and souped-up car help an overeager undercover cop (Jimmy Fallon) pursue a gang of female bank robbers.
    View Trailer:
    * Small (Windows Media, QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Negative. Jimmy Fallon. How exactly do you describe his brand of comedy?

    From what I can tell, Fallon is seen as a comedic voice for a young, stylishly messed up hair generation, an entertainer for the Hollister-wearing sect who think that Hot Topic is “keeping it real” and are really edgy, and he’s also one of the only comedians who I can tell, by watching Weekend Update on SNL who delighted in laughing at his own jokes. In the trailer for TAXI, oddly enough, he seems to just play things straight. Why no one thought to tell him this technique might have been infinitesimally more effective years ago than giggling like a wanton school girl after everything Tina Fey had to say is beyond me. Here, however, he comes off with a slight sheen of charisma and I actually believe it.

    He comes off as inept, meek, and irresponsible, strengths he can really play to his advantage, and when he tries to commandeer a vehicle, in the opening scene of this trailer, to chase down one of the finest looking ladies this side of Brigitte Nielsen who just robbed a bank, the ensuing pile up of cars lets you know precisely what you’re going to get in this film. Although the “alright, I get it” feeling comes over you after the 3rd or 4th car that rams into each other, it isn’t until he steps into Queen Latifah’s cab where all the ire for this film should be aimed at.

    “I don’t usually stop for white guys; my way of balancing the universe.”

    If you pause for a moment and think about the implications of the above quote you will notice that this marks the 2nd film, right after BRINING DOWN THE HOUSE, which has used poking fun at white people as its comedic thrust inside its trailers. I won’t make a commentary about the right of equal time in the future should someone have the brass ones to do it right back, but the very same vibe that kept me from going to see HOUSE are the same ones that will keep me from even coming close to seeing this one. Odd word choice aside, the AC/DC song “Highway to Hell” is a nice inclusion into the trailer’s background. Latifah’s souped-up taxi, looking like a repainted version of K’s car seen in MEN IN BLACK, is the focus for much of what remains of the trailer after this.

    After we get the set-up, there are some moments that are supposed to be funny: Queen puckers her lips to the hot bank robber as they drive next to each other, Queen says she’ll help Jimmy out but “the meter’s running,” Jimmy blows out Queen’s passenger side window with a wayward gunshot only to have Queen yell at him with Fallon jumping back in an inexplicable moment of childish cowardice. To make up for the previous minute and a half of skin pulling, we get something most of the dudes out there can appreciate: bikinis, guns, fast cars, broken glass, and, the ever popular when you have a movie with fast moving vehicles, a jump over an unfinished bridge.

    Luc Besson. Does anyone remember when his movies conjured up images of young ladies with pistols? Of Rosanna Arquette in the water with an intimidating Jean Reno as he plunged deep into the ocean? Of finely crafted action movies? Well, I have and he’s actually credited with penning a very early draft of this film. I cannot imagine, and it pains me to try, what kind of hatchet job this movie has been through since it left his hands. I hardly think he had Fallon and Latifah getting into zany misadventures in mind when he put pen to paper.


    PAULY SHORE IS DEAD (2004) Director:Pauly Shore
    Cast: Jaime Bergman, Ben Stiller, Sean Penn, Fred Durst, Tom Sizemore, Chris Rock, Whoopi Goldberg, Heidi Fleiss, Ellen DeGeneres, Kurt Loder
    Release:Summer 2004 (Limited)
    Synopsis: Hollywood comedian/actor Pauly Shore loses everything: his house, nobody in Hollywood wants to represent him, he moves back home with his mom and is now parking cars at the Comedy Store. Then one night when he’s up in his mom’s loft, a dead famous comedian appears who tells Pauly to kill himself cause he’ll go down as a comedic genius who died before his time. Pauly then fakes his own death, and the media goes crazy. Celebrities are talking about him on MTV and girls are fighting over him on Jerry Springer. It’s everything that he wanted…his plan worked. A week or so later the LAPD is tipped off about his whereabouts and they break down the door of the seedy motel room that he’s hiding out in and throw him in LA County’s celebrity wing.
    View Trailer:
    * Large (Quick Time)

    Prognosis: Positive. Is it wrong to admit that there is something funny about this movie?

    I believe the statement can be made that I was probably not the only one who helped financially support Pauly Shore’s career in the real late 80’s, early 90’s. I was there for ENCINO MAN, I paid to see SON-IN-LAW, I laughed at IN THE ARMY NOW (which, I am almost therapeutically admitting here, I just bought on DVD), and I even ponied up a couple week’s allowance (back when a CD sale meant you only paid $15.99) for his first comedy CD.

    Then 1994 hit.

    I don’t know if it was a paradigm shift in my own taste or the taste with the rest of the country but his shtick was simply not funny anymore. I happily lost track of the VHS copies of his movies and all but forgot about my interest in the man. Then, a few years ago, there was resurgence, a blip really, of popularity for the man. I had heard about him wanting to make this film, saw him incessantly on Celebrities Uncensored (a vile vice worse than pounding stacks of Double Stuf Oreos late at night), and developed a little short-term nostalgia for the man. The premise of this flick is great: Pauly appears to off himself as a P.R. stunt to secure a somewhat luxurious place in comedic history as a memorable actor but eventually gets caught trying to do pull it all off.

    What’s great about this trailer is that it moves fast. We are shown a man on the downslide of life: his sitcom is cancelled, that Carrot Top moved inside his old house (I believe Carrot Top is the devil incarnate and makes the joke ever so much funnier.), is despondent as he lives inside his mother’s house and gets the idea to kill himself, and that’s where the cameos start.

    One thing you’ll notice about the movie, if you investigate it further, is the sheer amount of celebrity that is squeezed into it. Not only do you get View Askew’s own Jason Mewes, but you have enough A-list and B-list starts to choke a chicken with. Chris Rock? Vince Vaughn? The Hilton sisters? The list literally could go on for a few inches, and it does for nearly a foot, as the number of actors who are in this movie are mind-boggling.

    I am not sure if the trailer does itself a disservice by not giving more of a glimpse of the star power contained in it. I realize that even though it might be cheating by showing a cameo and it ends up only lasting a few seconds when the movie actually plays but tough crap. I bought enough X-Men books in my day that showed an all out war on the cover only to be stiffed by a weak ass fight near the end of the book. Even though this film is only getting a limited release, the website says the DVD will follow shortly thereafter. Either way, I’ll give this film a chance and take a second look at the Weasel.


    CHRISTMAS WITH THE CRANKS (2004) Director: Joe Roth
    Cast: Tim Allen, Jamie Lee Curtis, Dan Aykroyd
    Release: November 24, 2004
    Synopsis: Based on the John Grisham bestseller of the same name, the film centers on Luther Krank, a man who decides to skip Christmas and all the surrounding trappings and go on a vacation with his wife Nora (Curtis) instead. When his daughter decides at the last minute to come home for the holiday, Krank is forced to put Christmas back together.
    View Trailer:
    * Small (Flash)

    Prognosis: Negative. Where do you put a movie like this?

    I can tell you, without even having read the script or seeing more than five minutes of contiguous footage, your parents will love this film. They will laugh their proverbial nuts off when the mailman goes sliding on a sheet of ice or when Tim Allen gets a face full of Botox and can’t manage to keep anything in his mouth because he’s virtually numb from the neck up; this is comedic gold, nay, comedy platinum, to Middle America.

    Snobbery has nothing to do with the above comments, but a lack of creativity and originality has everything to do with how limp this film looks. Many of us expect more from our films only because we’ve seen it all already and probably, as young’uns, have seen both sides of the funny movie coin. If I took an informal poll I would guess that most here enjoy the more subtle giggles of a movie that doesn’t pander as hard as this film does in its trailer. There is a heavy reliance on physical humor with the jokes and it’s a market already cornered, currently, by Will Ferrell.

    The film had an interesting premise: a husband and wife decide to skip celebrating the annual ritual of gift giving, but, as an army of soccer moms and dads bear down on the couple, a latter day suburban junta clad with warriors willing to take down moving vehicles, we have a community that is freakishly willing to fight their neighbors to male them see the error of their ways; they obviously aren’t too concerned with the Goldman’s or Schwartz’s around the corner. That’s the real shame here. A film that could have been done with sinister precision is now your everyday adult comedy brought to you with as much bite as a toothless heroin user.

    Taken together, and considering the odd, singular CGI inserts showing the decimation of a Christmas tree and a wrecking ball that takes out a snowman, the only thing really appealing in this trailer is seeing Jamie-Lee Curtis scream her lungs out no less than three times; it reminded me of better days, and better films, like HALLOWEEN. Such is the cost of growing older, I guess.

    A movie like this, with a built-in reading audience that gobbles Grisham’s work up with every published novel that debuts, might just be critic-proof in the same way most summer flicks are impenetrable by a reviewers’ stern cautioning. It’s light, whimsical fare, coupled with a holiday centered theme, might turn a tidy profit with the crowds that will flock to this flick in heady anticipation of seeing that mailman take another spill on his ass.


    NOI ALBINOI (2003) Director: Dagur Kári
    Cast:
    Release: Fall 2004 (Limited)
    Synopsis: Is he the village idiot or a genius in disguise? 17 year old Noi drifts through life on a remote fjord in the north of Iceland. In winter, the fjord in the north of Iceland is cut off from the outside world, surrounded by ominous mountains and buried under a shroud of snow. Noi dreams of escaping from this white-walled prison with Iris, a city girl who works in a local gas station. But his clumsy attempt at escape spirals out of control and ends in complete failure. Only a natural disaster will shatter Noi’s universe and offer him a window into a better world.
    View Trailer:
    * Large (Quick Time, Windows Media, Real Player)

    Prognosis: Positive. There are many reasons to escape the mainstream. Many people will say it’s just because some individuals want to appear cool or put on the affectations of someone who needs to be different but, to me, escaping the populist fare of modern American cinema and seeking a flick like this might be enough to simply give someone an appreciation for the talent exuding from other parts of the world.

    Yes, this is a film with subtitles. Unfortunately or fortunately, depending if you’re racist, according to The National Foreign Language Center in Washington DC, the percentage of individuals who speak English around the entire globe is roughly only around 20%. What this means to you is that there is 80% of the world’s population who have stories to tell, who don’t speak this language, want to put it on DV or celluloid and this is one that has been graciously subtitled for our pleasure. It’s a story unlike every other that will come out this year and it’s visual appeal would’ve made up for any ambiguity in the plot of which there is none as everything is easily understandable if you’re willing to just look at it.

    We have our protagonist, who looks like a darker, more brooding version of Powder, who has to start his day in the cold Nordic town in which he lives. Simply looking at the snowed-in area in which he lives is enough to make you thankful this is summertime and that most of us live closer to the equator than they do, but there is a subtle, genuine beauty in it all. There is also something to be said of the first few bars of music that underlay the imagery; it’s warm and inviting in a way that an unknown song sonically takes you over. After our man gets his rump out of bed, instead of him shoveling the driveway he has to shovel out of his house.

    We next get the vibe there is something going on with the boy as he hasn’t really said a word as he uses a rifle to shoot truck sized icicles off a small mountain ridge; it seems very sad in a “tell me more” kind of way. The obligatory “we won!” award mentions, playing right in with the mood of the trailer, is welcome. Lord only knows what kind of an uphill battle this movie has with the market for foreign films not spoken in English being what is here in the States and so it’s nice to see that others have done the work for you and there just may be something there worth the effort to see. This sentiment is confirmed as our young man, Noi, is scrutinized by a shrink who asks how often the young man “flogs the dolphin.” From here we learn the kid wants to be a lawyer, much to the amusement of the man sitting with him in his Jockey’s and wife beater, and then, out of nowhere, we get a lone man on a stage. The man starts to sing a song in English, imagine that, and it’s genuinely effective here as our protagonist gallivants with a brown haired beauty that could pass for a Nordic Kirsten Dunst in low light; the two kiss, have a little fun, and then she breaks a window to get inside a house. It’s all very sweet.

    The remainder of this trailer gives us snippets of reviews from American sources in an attempt to give this film, again, a better chance of survival in the open waters of commerce. It’s not that it’s desperate but it’s an admirable thing to see someone trying so hard to get a film noticed. Even based on the remaining clips at the end of this trailer I would gladly pass up WHITE CHICKS or any number of failed attempts at populist pap. The latter does have a warm place in my heart, it does. It’s just when you see something like this that makes you wonder at the possibilities at what 80% of the world is capable of producing.


    PHANTOM OF THE OPERA (2004) Director: Joel Schumacher
    Cast: Gerard Butler, Emmy Rossum, Patrick Wilson, Simon Callow, Miranda Richardson, Minnie Driver
    Release: December 3, 2004 (Limited)
    Synopsis: Andrew Lloyd Webber’s The Phantom of the Opera tells the story of a disfigured musical genius (Gerard Butler) who haunts the catacombs beneath the Paris Opera, waging a reign of terror over its occupants. When he falls fatally in love with the lovely Christine (Emmy Rossum), the Phantom devotes himself to creating a new star for the Opera, exerting a strange sense of control over the young soprano as he nurtures her extraordinary talents.
    View Trailer:
    * Medium (QuickTime, AOL Media Player)

    Prognosis: Positive. The man who made sure Hollywood didn’t dump one wooden nickel into a comic book film for years made this film? I’m beyond impressed.

    It starts out very dingy. There is clutter everywhere on the screen. Harking back to the 1800’s, where candles and bright colored costumes provided the means by which people were entertained, the film takes place in the Paris Opera House but the trailer gives none of this information. The trailer is as delicate as the ballerina’s feet that warm themselves up in a small wooden box on the floor, next to the stage on which she will perform.

    The violin that plays quickly, keeping pace with the back and forth clips from various points in the film, works perfectly with the dark mood that the movie conveys. We get to see the lush fabric the players used in their productions, the conductor in the orchestra pit handing out music for the merry minstrels to play, exotic dancing and formal moments of ballroom waltzing flicker for a moment together in one breath. There are masks, sword fighting in the snow, an ugly chick, spacious rooms where people are gallivanting gleefully, a glimpse at the Phantom, torches (which may mean a hunt for the phantom beast in which case I hope Schumacher decides this could story could use some revising as well with things possibly resulting in a public burning at the stake.), a monkey (which always does a movie a bit of good), some late night boating, and a hoard of other mentally burnable images that just go by too fast to mention.

    The music is simply delicious, the cast isn’t pimped out with high-class names, like sellable whores to make the masses come, there is no scroll of any kind (save for the obligatory maker of the film and when it is coming out), and it makes me want to see what kind of film this can be even more. There is room for error, for sure, but Schumacher is still in the hole with me for his successful barfing upon the BATMAN series and the piss poor attempt at making Chris Rock into some kind of action star with BAD COMPANY. He does get some Brownie points towards getting his Good Director patch back with this trailer but if this film is half as good as the clips within it indicate he mustn’t worry about a thing.

    July 2, 2004

    Trailer Park: All-Star Break

    Filed under: Columns,Trailer Park — admin @ 4:59 pm

    E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES

    By Christopher Stipp

    July 2, 2004

    ALL-STAR BREAK

    4th of July Weekend.

    This is a great time to catch up on all the summer fare that’s out there for your viewing pleasure but I thought I would give a little independent trailer love for those of you who find enjoyment in sitting on your dead ass for a few hours watching a baseball game in the form of UP FOR GRABS. The trailer looks damn funny for a documentary on Barry Bonds’ winning season in 2001 for the amount of home runs he managed to whack and the ensuing, in more ways than one, yahoos who fought over possession of his record breaking home run ball. If it was my film, in an alternate dimension, you would have seen Northsiders from Chicago fighting each other over Sammy Sosa’s record breaking home run ball but I guess if the lucky athlete had to come from a second rate team in a second rate division who has some real anger issues and can’t bring himself to cork his own bat, so be it. All kidding aside, no I’m not, it’s worth the time to at least look at for the amusement factor of seeing grown men fighting over a ball; that’s MasterCard priceless all in itself.

    In other trailer bits, here is a press release describing some “cutting edge” trailer technology that will make watching these little bits of glorified adverts even more fun to watch: “Moviegoers will have a whole new way to experience and interact with movie trailers online beginning June 28th with the debut of the SmarTrailerâ„¢ of Touchstone Pictures/Jerry Bruckheimer’s exciting adventure, “National Treasure” on Yahoo! Movies (http://movies.yahoo.com). SmarTrailerâ„¢, a new innovation in online viewing, provides the option of viewing the film’s theatrical trailer in its entirety or viewing the trailer and exploring particular areas of interest by clicking on picture windows that appear as the trailer plays. The SmarTrailerâ„¢ for “National Treasure” will play exclusively on Yahoo for two days before beginning its continuous run at www.nationaltreasure.com starting July 30th. For “National Treasure,” nine unique windows will lead viewers to one-minute information “pods” that delve into specific topics related to the film, the historical facts behind the story, and the filmmaking process. Browsers will be able to explore a variety of topics. For example, “The Treasure is Real” section offers expert testimony from professional treasure hunters W.J. Jameson and author Mark Finnan about the untold riches our Founding Fathers may have buried right beneath our feet. The “Knights of Templar” section talks about the great wealth amassed by the secretive medieval band of knights and where it might have gone after they fled Europe. Other pods cover such topics “Benjamin Franklin,” “The Money Pit,” “The Freemasons,” “The Clues Around Us,” “The Declaration of Independence,” “Secrets and Spies,” and “Real Locations.” Basically, for those still scratching their temples, it’s like having DVD-like extras embedded inside the trailer. While I was a little ho-hum over the trailer for NATIONAL TREASURE this makes getting to know a movie a lot more fun.

    Be sure to check out my favorite trailer selection this week in the form of BLADE: TRINITY. If any of you want to comment on what you think a film with Jessica Biel and Ryan Reynolds as vampire hunters will be like, and the hilariousness that might ensue if they try to play their parts with a straight face, I would me more than happy to entertain any of your thoughts.

    Enjoy the holiday, be mindful and remember those who have to deal with real fireworks on a daily basis, and don’t go blowing your hands off with cheap fireworks. Placing them in mailboxes that aren’t yours is much funnier and safer until you get caught by the police; then it’s really funny.


    NATIONAL TREASURE (2004) Director:Jon Turteltaub
    Cast:Nicolas Cage, Justin Bartha, Sean Bean, Harvey Keitel, Diane Kruger, Christopher Plummer, Don McManus, Mark Pellegrino
    Release: November 24, 2004
    Synopsis:Benjamin Franklin Gates (Cage) descends from a family of treasure-seekers who’ve all hunted for the same thing: a war chest hidden by the Founding Fathers after the Revolutionary War. Ben’s close to discovering its whereabouts, as is his competition, but the FBI is also hip to the hunt.
    View Trailer:
    * Medium (Windows Media, QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Disaffected.First, there’s a lot of gold everywhere in this trailer.

    Whether it’s from some torches or flames from a fire or the appearance of gold coinage, there’s more than enough of the yellow hued color to go around; I am reminded of the kind of imagery I liked with Stephen Sommers’ MUMMY series with its heavy usage on the screen and am wondering if this emblematic of the malaise I felt, the jaundice of my pleasure center, after watching this trailer. .

    What I don’t like, initially, about the trailer is the use of an old crotchety Wilford Brimley-esque monologue from Christopher Plummer. I like seeing him but in this film, as he talks to a young Nick Cage about what essentially this whole movie is about, the protection of treasure (which I am still unclear as to the extent of the implications if said treasure is pilfered by someone evildoers), and how clues to the whereabouts of the treasure, that had been moved all over the world, ended up in America and now needs to be found; I, too, was unclear about what I had to remember being important about Cage’s character. We are given to visual clues as to the location of the treasure by clues imbedded in the very money we all enjoy to have in our pockets and, essentially, it is Nick’s destiny to protect it. The whole time the old codger is talking to a more youthful, less nepotistic Cage, the kid is just sitting there all doe eyed and doesn’t say a word. Hell, even I would be thinking it’s time for gramps to take his meds by asking some kind of questions, but we roll on anyway and fast forward decades into the future. We get Cage holding the ubiquitous torch in a tomb (doesn’t anyone carry a flashlight in those things?) as he looks all steely eyed and macho in pursuit of this legendary treasure.

    The bravado is halted for a moment for Jon “My Daughter May Be Crazy But She Fine” Voight to rip a page from James Lipton’s Acting in a Box as he scolds Cage for his relentless search for the treasure that seems to be a broken record on everyone’s lips. “Don’t you get it, Ben?! The treasure is a myth.” Of course, our hero will be undeterred by such nay saying and refuses to believe a word of it. Thanks, now that makes two annoying codgers so far in a movie that is being brought to me by the same man who kept me glued to every foible Amazing Race. We finally get to the last real challenge, and point to the whole film, to securing the safety of the elusive treasure at this point in the trailer: stealing the Declaration of Independence. It seems quite manufactured, almost, to have a plot based on one of the hardest things to get access to in the first place, but this isn’t my action movie, it’s about Cage and his plan to boost one of the nation’s oldest documents. There are some scenes cut into the moment where they are trying to get access to the historical artifact through legitimate means that just serve to confuse the viewer. One moment Cage is sitting pretty in an office and then, somehow, he’s in the tundra, snow whizzing everywhere, yelling at some dude to stay down, and then he’s back in his warm little chair. It’s odd. But just when you think all I’m doing is being a playa hata there is a salve that gets applied to my aching action heart: Sean Bean.

    Not since Alan Rickman in DIE HARD have I ever wanted a bad guy to win in a movie than I did with Sean Bean in PATRIOT GAMES. Sean is excellent as a baddie and he works it to good effect here. This excitement is counter-balanced by a voice over that does not work well. I swear it’s the same guy who does voice work for PBS’ Frontline series; it’s merely informative, dry and it’s placed into a trailer that doesn’t need a voice over. Regardless, the rest of the trailer is all a bunch of stock action scenes as Cage tries to steal the Declaration to finally satiate 20 centuries worth of work to keep some vague treasure secure.

    Seeing how the director Jon Turteltaub was responsible for the 90’s classics 3 NINJAS, DISNEY’S THE KID, WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING, and, my favorite, COOL RUNNINGS I am curious to see what will emerge from the man in terms of quality. Maybe he could toss a few more torches in there for good measure.


    SUSPECT ZERO (2004) Director:E. Elias Merhige
    Cast:Aaron Eckhart, Ben Kingsley, Carrie-Anne Moss, Harry Lennix
    Release:August 27, 2004
    Synopsis:Dallas FBI agent Thomas Mackelway (Aaron Eckhart) is investigating the case of a murdered serial killer when the trail leads him to a renegade former FBI agent (Ben Kingsley), who is hunting down serial killers on his own, in this crime thriller about a man who becomes the very thing he’s trying to eradicate.
    View Trailer:
    * Medium (Windows Media, Quick Time)

    Prognosis: Positive. I like Aaron Eckhart. I love Ben Kingsley. It’s like having an Oreo cookie except these are people and not cookies.

    The first half a minute of this two minute trailer is pure delight. We get a good setup by being slightly off balance simply because you have no idea what the hell is going on (one of the best things to do in a trailer if it’s done right) and getting a great payoff before really being given guidance in what the larger implications of this film are. Carrie-Anne Moss, vastly wasted in a couple of small films she did last year, is back to good use here in her first moments back on screen. It will be good to see if she can channel some of the energy that made her a great supporting character in MEMENTO. What’s really noticeable, however, is how deliberately controlled the information being given out is. Not too much, and not to little to keep people confused.

    After we find out that Sir Ben is whacking serial killers before the po pos get a chance to rough the suspects up in the interrogation room with plungers, we get introduced the rest of the crew. No one could be more excited than me that Tom Dilton, aka Harry J. Lennix, is in this movie. Say what you will about the man who seems to have one kind of acting style but his place in history is set with me after his role as the man who almost got into it with Damon Wayans in MO’ MONEY. It’s really nice to note that it isn’t until we’re really into this trailer before we get a better glimpse of Eckhart as the ring leader of the investigation, but we also get some great cinematography that goes along with the explanation as to how Kingsley might be doing it. Remote viewing, a practice usually reserved for discussion on Coast-to-Coast with Art Bell, is the root for all evil in Eckhart’s quest to hunt down Kingsley and the information being given to the audience keeps everyone informed without feeling spoon fed.

    This is all accomplished in the first minute.

    The last half of the trailer is a little more exposition from Ben, “no one told us how to turn it off,” to Eckhart as he becomes entrenched in playing the bad ass mutha who won’t stop rolling on his personal pain train until Kingsley is caught or stopped. There is some really jarring imagery that doesn’t help at all in piecing together what the hell is happening in this film or with any great hint about how it all ends (big thank you to the studio from doing that) but I could have done without the scroll that says “if you think you’re being watched, you are” as it doesn’t serve to add to the work already being done by the players of this film; it distracts. It’s to be expected that things can’t be completely perfect but the film looks like a solid entry into the supernatural/drama/thriller/serial killer genre.


    CODE 46 (2004) Director: Michael Winterbottom
    Cast: Tim Robbins, Samantha Morton
    Release:August 6, 2004 (limited)
    Synopsis: Code 46 is a love story set in an eerily possible near-future where cities are heavily controlled and only accessible through checkpoints. People cannot travel unless they have “papelles,” a special travel insurance. Outside these cities, the desert has taken over and shanty towns are jammed with non-citizens – people without papelles whose lives are severely restricted. William (Robbins) is a family man who works as an insurance investigator.
    When his company sends him to another city to solve a case of fake papelles, he meets a woman named Maria (Morton). Although he knows she has been creating the forgeries, he falls completely in love with her. He hides her crime and they have a wild, passionate affair that can only last as long as his papelles: 24 hours. Back home, William is obsessed with the memory of Maria. He tries to see her but is refused the necessary papers to travel. Desperate, he uses one of the fake papelles he kept from his investigation. He eventually tracks her down, only to discover she has been accused of a Code 46 violation.

    View Trailer:
    * Small, Medium, Large (Quick Time, Real Media, Windows Media)

    Prognosis: Positive. Tim Robbins in a futuristic love fest with a plot that doesn’t make sense even after the trailer is done trying to make a sale for itself?

    The trailer, though, is wonderful to look at and admire.

    It starts off with a red, barren desert. The digital noise that permeates the visuals in the first few seconds is something akin to the longitude/latitude bearings you would get in a Go Army commercial and I wait with cautious anticipation to see the lone figure moving along the plane with a walking stick get taken out with a sniper’s bullet. The noise has no reason to exist but it is quickly forgotten as the wonderment of trying to figure out what the hell is going on provides just as much amusement.

    We get our first look at Robbins driving out on a road that bisects this desert landscape asking how people can exist on the fringe (fringe of what?) but it doesn’t make sense until we see him walking through the neon paradise of a futuristic city that looks like Hong Kong or a densely populated Times Square. Coupled with the scroll, again with that damn digital noise, that says “your life is determined for you” with some scattered imagery along with “including who you can love” I am start to get it. Things are hazy with how any of this applies to a plot, with over a third of the trailer finished, but the visual style is extremely alluring. The voice over finally chimes in and lets us know that Robbins has a skill to read minds and has 24 hours to unravel a mystery (It’s still a friggin’ mystery to me too, Bub.) but then Samantha Morton appears and it’s kismet.

    Just as quick as she appears, we get pounded with information pertaining to crime, a murder, and she’s a suspect. He ends up meeting her, gets a few questions answered, boffs her promptly, and then the both of them are caught up in a tangled situation. After we’re told she violated Code 46, which we’re not told what it means, and if it’s anywhere near to a rule on “loving” someone you’re not supposed to I’ll be very upset, but we then get some lazy, slapped together quick clips of the two of them just hanging out with each other, to some of Robbins chasing Morton, to him flirting with her, to her being banished to the red desert land, to a car driving real fast in the city, to a car overturning in the red desert land and the Tilt-O-Whirl of that is this trailer ends with a voice over that tells me, “how do you solve a crime when the last thing you want to know is the truth?” Huh?

    This may be the most obfuscating plot line I have ever had to try to figure out. I get it, sorta, about what generally is happening but I am not entirely positive that confusing an audience or being glib about having style trump substance is the direction you really want to go.


    UP FOR GRABS (2004) Director: Mike Wranovics
    Cast: A lot of crybabies
    Release: The Film Festival Circuit
    Synopsis: The absurd true story of the legal battle over the “Million-Dollar Baseball.” Barry Bonds’ record setting 73rd home run ball sparks a melee in the stands at Pac Bell Park in San Francisco. One guy caught the ball, another guy ended up with it. Who is the rightful owner? The lawyers can’t agree; the fans can’t agree; even the wizened professors of property law can’t agree. This is a story documenting the hilarious lengths to which someone will go for a baseball, and the few fans that will put their lives on hold for years, staking everything on one judge’s decision.
    View Trailer:
    * Small, Medium (Real Player, Quick Time, Windows Media)

    Prognosis: Positive. Going into the All-Star break in a little while, I thought I would throw a bone to those who find themselves glued to SportsCenter night after night to see what happened in the land that baseball, or Kevin Costner, built.

    For those in the know, Barry Bonds might as well be the best, pompous, brash, arrogant, athletic, and feared hitter playing baseball today. Many times he never gets a chance to hit simply because he gets walked more often than a prized poodle, but when it was 2001, and the race was on for him to set a new home run record, people were beside themselves to witness baseball history in the making. When he did hit his magical number, and it was a shot deep into right, the gloves of the masses were ready for the snatch and grab of a lifetime. What happened, when the dust settled, was enough fodder to cobble together a documentary.

    The trailer to UP FOR GRABS should be commended for its ability to make something fairly mundane, a row between a few people over the ownership of a ball that easily retails for a few bucks, and transforming it into an amusing sports drama.

    It starts out explaining everything very clearly for those not familiar what the big hubbub was about as it uses actual footage of the case in question and intersperses it with the accounts of the people who were right in middle of the physical maelstrom. It’s after the frantic grabs by the mob cease when the high pitch hisses, from those involved in the catfight for who was really the owner of the ball, start and make things interesting. Is possession 9/10’s the law or is this a case of someone aggressively snatching what was not theirs? Almost like the Zapruder film was scrutinized by the Warren Commission so too do these “fans” start quibbling over who did what to whom. Then, to add a little more understanding as to what it is going on, the trailer adds in nice visual sound bites from those who’ve seen the film. Instead of the snippets being some plants from 60 Second Review saying “It was farking amazing! It’s better than Cats!” we get “A sports-themed “Rashomon’ with an O. Henry twist” and “Displays the absurd comic qualities of a Christopher Guest movie.” These are the kinds of compliments, subtle and informative, a movie should try to attain if it’s going to use them at all. It’s not so much a review as it is at setting the proper expectations.

    “Deliciously mean-spirited.”

    After this, we get all those involved in the case, on the witness stand mind you, testifying in a court-o-law like a squad of quibbling sixth graders who feel the need to throw tantrums before feeling a sense of satisfaction. It is of no matter what really happens in the end, as this trailer gives nothing away as to its ending, but the desire here shouldn’t be to look up how things really stand today. It would rob you the satisfaction of seeing these babies duke it out on the big screen. Adult babies are so much better when amplified to a 16:9 ratio.


    BLADE: TRINITY (2004) Director:David S. Goyer
    Cast:Wesley Snipes, Kris Kristofferson, Ryan Reynolds, Jessica Biel, Parker Posey
    Release: December 10, 2004
    Synopsis: Wesley Snipes returns as the day-walking vampire hunter in the explosive third and final film in the Blade franchise, Blade: Trinity. When the Vampire Nation hatches a plan to frame Blade in a series of brutal killings, he must join forces with the Nightstalkers, a clan of human vampire hunters, in an extreme battle in which the trail of blood leads directly to the notorious vampire legend, Dracula.
    View Trailer:
    * Medium (Windows Media)

    Prognosis: Positive. Seeing this makes me both wonder why this isn’t coming out until December and why they thought Jessica Biel makes a great vampire huntress. The only answer I can come up with is because she’s hot, but I have no explanation for the former.

    “I’m gonna have to ask you a few questions.”

    A faceless voice asks this as a nondescript city turns to night. A clip from the first BLADE appears.

    We get a good look at a dweeb in glasses who asks Blade, “What can you tell me of vampires?” Before you can wonder if he’s in police custody we get a visage of a pale goddess, sauntering slowly towards the camera, an obvious threat to any human male not already claimed as a slave to the vampire’s cause. Blade says back “they exist” and makes an angry move towards his interrogator as the footage that actually pertains to this film is put on hold and we take a trip in the way back machine.

    What’s really nice about this opening is how New Line uses the blood red logo with the blade series; it has become as ubiquitous as the green WB for the Matrix trilogy but brand recognition is taken one step further. The Marvel logo also plays a small role as a leaping Blade arcs in front of it, jumping, obviously cribbed from the first film, and lands, just as he did when he had his final battle with Stephen Dorff. What happens next is either a good thing or a lazy tactic to bring a segment of the audience up to speed with what has happened in Blade’s last two adventures. We get a great “Best of” from the first film as the throaty, chain-smoking action voice over guy tells us “first, he faced their gods.” The same is true for the second film as, “then, he battled their demons, but all that was only the beginning.” Ok, I love the franchise. Nothing has been more delightful than waiting for this film to finally hit but, come on, why does everything have to be “˜just the beginning’ when it comes to a new chapter in the series? No, it’s not the damn beginning. Blade I was the beginning as Blade II was the second and this will be the third. The first Lord Of The Rings was just the beginning and this is simply a continuation.

    So, at the halfway point we get some new BLADE footage, and it’s an odd image of some people walking around in space suits (huh?), and it starts to look like a sequel to DUNE or STARGATE before we get into the really meaty bits that make some sense. We get Whistler, the daughter of Whistler doing some old and busted kung-fu with the “come-on” extended arm/hand combo, Ryan Reynolds showing some promise as a former vampire if he isn’t used to amp up the yuk factor, but before it turns into the Nick and Jessica Variety Hour with the level of other B-list talent in the house Snipes shows us why the first flick still stands as the cult classic it should be. Blade tosses weaponry indiscriminately through fire, is looking great from a choreographic standpoint, kicks lots of ass with believable ferocity, and is still the master of being able to deliver one-liners without it being drenched in irony.

    The BLADE series has been a very solid series for some very simple reasons:

    1. David Goyer. The man has singularly developed this character and it hasn’t been wrested out of his control to the point of dilution from a dozen different writers who “envision” something different for the vampire slayer.

    2. The direction. First we get some grade A work from Norrington, then it fell on del Toro’s able shoulders, and now it falls on the man who has seen it all? It doesn’t get better than that.

    3. The story. The mythos has been based on a great concept and the viability of the trilogy will only stand insofar as the integrity, yes, you have integrity with an action movie, of what made things interesting as a story stay unmolested.

    June 25, 2004

    Trailer Park: World Wide Web

    Filed under: Columns,Trailer Park — admin @ 4:58 pm

    E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES

    By Christopher Stipp

    June 25, 2004

    WORLD WIDE WEB

    What’s to say as we get closer to the opening of SPIDER-MAN 2?

    I still think the trailer for SM2 is one of the top five I’ve seen all year and there aren’t a whole lot more fan boys who are more excited than me to see how Raimi did with the second chapter of the franchise. If buzz from those who’ve seen it is any indication I am sure a whole lot of people will not be upset with the sequel. It’s nice to think that the trailer for SM2 holds up to all any concerns as to whether or not the direction Raimi headed in was down a path of Lucas-esque indignation and indifference to what fans really wanted and needed out of a sequel. It now it becomes a matter of having the public of deciding whether or not Spidey has the legs to beat the sophomore slump, but like any good comic book nerd doing his duty I will be there first thing on Wednesday to see if the trailer was a thrilling smoke and mirror trick.

    If fanboys out there want a tip about how to truly appreciate a summer film like SPIDER-MAN 2 with an honest eye, here it is: go in with the lowest of expectations. 9 of 10 times, just like STAR WARS: EPISODE 1, one goes into a tentpole high on expectations and ends up fighting the feelings the movie sucked like an out-of-control ShopVac but can’t let it go because you knew in your heart the flick was gonna be “wicked hardcore.” Go in there expecting the worst so you can really see if it was worth the hype. (And I’d to send out big thanks to Warner’s for dragging its heels long enough on the Batman and Superman franchises to help Marvel establish market dominance. Your last few BATMAN films helped to set the bar real low for X-MEN, BLADE and their nicely financed sequels. As a Marvel man I like seeing these comics start coming to life and I know it much suck to be a part of the DC brood who are hanging out, waiting for the one company who holds all the rights to all the properties to get off their collective ass to catch up with the rest of the world. LXG sucked, but I am sure the new BATMAN film, hopefully, will be a good apology for the wait.) Oh yeah, before I forget, the SEPTEMBER TAPES trailer is my trailer of the week. I showed to some people who asked me, after seeing it, whether it was real or not. That’s the right answer after seeing this. A for effort goes to the people who cobbled that thing together. I know sometimes I say to check this trailer out, check that trailer out, but SEPTEMBER TAPES deserves a minute of your time. Good stuff.


    THE GRUDGE (2004) Director:Takashi Shimizu
    Cast: Sarah Michelle Gellar, Bill Pullman, Clea Duvall, Jason Behr, Kadee Strickland
    Release: October 29, 2004
    Synopsis:According to Japanese lore, “The Grudge” is the curse of one who dies in the grip of a powerful rage. Those who encounter this murderous supernatural curse are killed and the curse is reborn, passed on like a virus from victim to victim in an endless, growing chain of horror. Karen (Sarah Michelle Gellar), an American nurse living in Tokyo, unknowingly uncovers the source of the curse and must somehow escape the impending fits of rage and madness which will inevitably lead to her demise.
    View Trailer:
    * Medium (Windows Media, QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Positive.I can’t believe I actually like something with Sarah Michelle Gellar.

    I’m not a Buffy fan and, point of fact, I have never seen an episode of Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Teenage melodrama infused with a vampire with a severe blonde dye job and a vampire-with-a-soul who departed the show to hitch his wagon to LA and fight the supernatural was too much of a stretch for me. These comments are also coupled with the fact that Gellar has never made a film of any great importance or resonance (CRUEL INTENTIONS doesn’t count). All these myopic comments being said the trailer for THE GRUDGE looks just as splendid and just as great as the Japanese version currently making the rounds.

    What one notices right off the bat for this trailer is that the film is being produced by Sam Raimi. Nice. Sometimes “produced” or “executive produced” can mean a whole lot or it can mean that the guy given screen credit just called it in from his or her cushy air conditioned office. Touches of Raimi exude throughout this thing.

    As events unfold, being shown that the story takes place Japan, the scroll on the screen floats ethereally as it says “When Someone Dies in the Grip of a Powerful Rage a Curse is Left Behind.” A near perfect mood is set into motion. There isn’t one note of distracting music and not one voice telling me how spooky things are going to get. It’s wonderful.

    We next get a look at the other player in the mix of it all: Bill Pullman. For once I am glad they are going to the mature spectrum of the actor pool as he lends a certain gravitas to the picture that can’t really be expressed in words but things would be detrimentally more different if the producers would’ve added a Matthew Lillard or an Adam Brody into the mix.

    The scary stuff in this trailer comes too fast to focus on but if you use Quick Time you can slowly flip through the series of images that compose the blink-and-you’ll-miss-it slide show. It is really spooky crap. We have really pale looking dead people, a dead chick who comes down a flight of stairs on her stomach and then gives a look up to the camera in a way that simply raises the hair on the back of my neck, a dead couple sitting together in a dark place that induces the heebie-jeebies, and then, the piece de resistance, the thing that makes me feel safe, Sarah Michelle in the shower. Whoo-boy. Zombies and a hot blonde in the shower. Not since tequila and Doritos has a more powerful combination ever been assembled. The fact that Sarah has a dead zombie hand coming out of the back of her head before she’s had a chance to apply some of that Pert conditioner is a good indication of where things will be going.

    I am in full appreciation of this trailer. I love it and if anyone wants to naysay anything about it for its similar vibe to THE RING, so be it. I liked THE RING and if any movie wants to come correct with a movie full of creepy, let them. So much crap comes down the pike that tries to be effective as a “horror” film that’s usually filled with a half dozen teenagers but this trailer works, visually and tonally. Also, take into account that the man who did the Japanese original decided to helm the American version, so, at least in my book, it couldn’t be in better hands. Count me excited.


    DEAR FRANKIE (2004) Director:Shona Auerbach
    Cast:Emily Mortimer, Gerard Butler, Sharon Small, Jack McElhone
    Release:October 22, 2004
    Synopsis:A young boy’s father has been writing to him for years as he sailed the seven seas. When his ship finally comes in to port, the boy wants to see him, naturally. But now mom’s got to ‘fess up to who really wrote those letters, and why.
    View Trailer:
    * Medium (Windows Media)

    Prognosis: Sweet and Endearing. “Dear Dad, we’re moving again.”

    The boys from across the pond have created an interesting story idea: what if a deaf kid thinks that the father who has been communicating with him for years through a series of letters sent from all over the world, really written by his mother so the lad wouldn’t feel like a mope without a dad, is finally going to be showing up at his door as his mother scrambles to find a temporary replacement that might be able to pull it all off? Hilarity is sure to ensue, as is deaf jokes, in this gem of a trailer. I would say something here about the endearing nature of the film but this film, if you let it, is really good natured and asks, not demands, for attention.

    The kid, initially, comes off as a bit of a sad moppet. He begins his introduction to us by missing a goal while playing a game of football, or soccer to you Yankees, and is constantly putting small red pins into a world map that chart the course of his fake dad’s boat as indicated by said mom. You can tell that the relationship between him and his mother is a very close one so right away it is apparent that what his mother has been doing has been done out of love. So, what is even more interesting is that when the kid gets wind that his father’s proverbial ship has come in his mother, a single Scottish MILF looking for a man without scruples who can con her son into believing he is his dad, goes out trolling the local pubs in search for temporary help; what she comes up with amazes even me. The man for the job that she chooses, or hires, if you want to get technical, is nice looking, has a genuine charisma, an amiable attitude, and speaks well, which is all odd as I never knew the Scottish to be anything more than redheaded cheap scoundrels itching for fights; I’ve seen TRAINSPOTTING so don’t try and dissuade me on this point.

    What I like about this trailer is its ability to be able to set up a story and then go through the process of revealing small bits of it in nice, easy, digestible bits. This doesn’t look like a film that will win any awards as the movie looks to be tugging at the melodramatic heart strings as the fill-in dad is shown sharing a sundae with the lad, teaches him to block that goal he missed in the beginning of the trailer, and then gets all sweet on the boy’s mum as they have a moment where they dance together. If The Edge were to score a film’s soundtrack that’s exactly the sound you would hear as this trailer winds its way down; it works perfectly. Even though I could tell you exactly where this film will be going by the time this trailer is finished (all beginning, middle and end is laid out there to see) I don’t rightly care to analyze it. It’s nice to have a movie like this not helmed by a Julia or a J-Lo or a Kate Hudson. I appreciate a good, fluffy, high-calorie, not-good-for-me slice of romantic comedy every once in a while; it helps to round out the diet, but this one looks a little bit better about making this a well-balanced meal if the trailer is any indication. Plus, you, if so inclined, can get extra Global Studies credit with the ladies by saying it’s a foreign film. It’s either this or the newest incarnation from Penny Marshall. I think the choice is obvious.


    SAINTS AND SINNERS (2004) Director: Abigail Honor
    Cast: Vincent Maniscalco, Edward DeBonis, Frank Maniscalo, Olga Debonis, Father Charles McCarron
    Release: June 18, 2004 (New York)
    Synopsis: After living together for seven years in a seemingly accepting community in New York City, Edward DeBonis and Vincent Maniscalco decide to get married. But unlike many other gay couples who formalize their relationship in a domestic union, Vincent and Edward, both devout Catholics, will settle for nothing short of the “Holy Sacrament of Marriage.” As America stands on the verge of legal acceptance of gay and lesbian unions, “Saints and Sinners” explores the social, political and religious aspects of same-sex marriage and examines its effect on American society.
    View Trailer:
    * Medium (Windows Media)

    Prognosis: Positive. I love a good documentary.

    Right now is a great time to be a lover of the genre as films like RIDING GIANTS, MICHAEL MOORE HATES AMERICA, FAHRENHEIT 9/11, WORD WARS, etc”¦ are all making great inroads into the cineplexes all over the country. Are there more being made, a function of our current binging in American society on anything smacking of “reality” or is it because after the hubbub of BOWLING FOR COLUMBINE studios see the power they can command at the box office when they can be made for a fraction of the cost of an actor-led production? Whatever the case, it’s wonderful to see a movie like SAINTS AND SINNERS get made and get out there to the public at large.

    The trailer is guided, sensationally, by churchy hymnal music. It’s relaxing as it evokes churchly images of piousness and quietude. As we get an overhead shot of New York City one doesn’t know quite what the hell is going on until we get the faint visage of the gay pride flag comes into focus and that’s the first volley in this commentary war on society.

    The second shot comes in the form of our leading men, Edward and Vincent, holding hands at what I can only assume is their wedding. We pause, briefly, for a quote from a reviewer over at Film Threat letting us know what he thought and it’s nice to see that the snippet they chose to use does more for the film than just tell me what a thrill ride it’s going to be. It’s appropriate and says a lot for the film as a whole. “This is the person who I am meant to be with and who I will be with.” We get a friend of the newlyweds who mentions that Edward and Vincent are unlike other wedded couples as they will not be able to partake of the 1,049 legal rights other heterosexual couples enjoy when they say “I do.” I haven’t been able to confirm these rights, one of them obviously doesn’t spell out that I’m in charge of the TiVo, but there are more comments from those partaking in the interview process of this documentary that range from shock, “we were thrown out of our church”; to indignation, “homosexuality is a disorder,” and back to a sobering comment from a father about his child, “you don’t want your son to be gay.”

    The mood then changes from being informational to becoming emotionally resonant as you see Edward and Vincent outside of the church taking photos, enjoying their wedding day, and there is a little girl in pink that stands against a wall of black suits and ties. Visually, it’s over in a flash but it works very well to encapsulate what is happening within the walls of this documentary. If things ended here it would be fine but we get one of the guys featured in this film who mentions, right before the screen goes black, that the people who feel righteously compelled to condemn him for his lifestyle, and they are shown standing outside the church chanting and commenting about the sanctity heterosexual marriage, “are the antitheists of being Christian.” That line comes out of nowhere that socks you like a pillow case full of metal Tonka trucks.

    The gauntlet is laid down and I am excited to see if this turns out better than an episode of MTV’s True Life but I am already sure what’s contained in the film will be infinitely more evocative than the slickly produced series and not tempered by a sense of making things palpable for possible advertisers or customers looking to shill a product to the masses.


    FINDING NEVERLAND (2002) Director: Marc Forster
    Cast: Johnny Depp, Kate Winslet, Julie Christie, Radha Mitchell, Dustin Hoffman
    Release: October 22, 2004
    Synopsis: Director Marc Forster’s follow-up to MONSTER’S BALL is FINDING NEVERLAND (previously known as J.M. BARRIE’S NEVERLAND), a tale of magic and fantasy inspired by the life of James Barrie, the real-life author of the children’s classic Peter Pan. Set in London in 1904, the film follows Barrie’s creative journey to bring Peter Pan to life, from his first inspiration for the story up until the play’s premiere at the Duke of York’s Theatre – a night that will change not only Barrie’s own life, but the lives of everyone close to him.
    View Trailer:
    * Medium (Windows Media, Quick Time)

    Prognosis: Positive. A period piece that includes kids, Johnny Depp, Dustin Hoffman, Kate Winslet, and has a premise that doesn’t suck is a very good thing.

    What you have here, essentially, is a movie about the genesis of Peter Pan. Someone did write a novelization of it before Disney sunk its colorful talons into it and this appears to be one of the better period pieces set near the beginning of the 1900’s. What is amazing about this trailer, apart from the intriguing story, is the value placed on showcasing the kids that prompted J.M. Barrie to write the perennial children’s classic and I believe this is the best reason why one would want to see this when compared to so many other productions that only try to capture adults being adults. How many Masterpiece Theater’s do you know dwell on the lives of young adults? I have yet to get a Degrassi Junior High set in Liverpool circa 1830 but I always think there’s hope.

    What is also especially nice about this trailer is the opening. We get nice piano music in the background that doesn’t annoy or distract and it has Depp meeting Winslet along with her many brood in tow. It doesn’t seem like much, I know, but the extended scene is wonderful to watch and it sets up that Depp is an author without that information being slammed on top of our heads; it comes out slowly and in brief hints. Depp is shown as a friend, really, of the young youths who Winslet is attempting to raise by herself and at the moment when you have one of the kids say “you’re not my father” it is clear where the real tension of this film will be coming from.

    It’s a simple, but effective, touch to have it briefly stated that this movie is based on true events and, again, not linger on it as the movie’s sole selling point. The direction the movie heads towards, more of a film about a man finding inspiration through a group of kids, opens the door for representations of childhood fantasy and imagination as evidenced by Depp’s storytelling in real life and having cartoonish representations come alive on the screen. There is even more tension heaped up on the whole shebang as people around Depp start questioning him about his motives, sincerity and even his own childish behavior.

    And then Dustin Hoffman shows up.

    It is after Hoffman’s appearance where everything about Peter Pan begins to become reality: the sets become representations of J.M. Barrie’s vision; the music behind it all is pitch perfect; and even that one of those very same boys of Winslet was named as the book’s titular character is a welcomed way to end everything in this film.

    I don’t normally like period pieces due to their stuffiness but this one looks absolutely enveloping and deserves a look into when it gets released later this year.


    SEPTEMBER TAPES (2004) Director: Christian Johnston
    Cast: George Calil, Wali Razaqi
    Release:August 2004
    Synopsis: One year after 9/11, an American journalist travels to Afghanistan in an effort to learn the truth about the search for Osama bin Laden.
    View Trailer:
    * Medium (Quick Time)

    Prognosis: Positive. Perfect trailer.

    For having a no name cast, the same for the director, a limited budget, and having a very indie sheen over everything, this trailer does what other studios wish they could do: generate interest.

    Piggybacking on the BLAIR WITCH PROJECT concept, people getting lost, having footage found after their disappearance, this is their story, etc”¦ this film looks to take the next step in cinema verite/fictional filmmaking.

    “My name is Don Larson, I am a documentary filmmaker here in Afghanistan.”

    It starts off with green night vision. Flickers of gunfire and bright light fill the screen as the effect of hazy video distorts the image. Our director introduces himself, scraggly, itchy beard growth around his face, short hair, and leads us to see the populated streets of Afghanistan where this story takes place. It feels very real. There is an honesty here that doesn’t feel forced or manipulative; it works. The camera then chooses to linger on a passerby who talks to our young director and reminds him this isn’t America and there is no telling what might happen to him. Even though that was a brick of foreshadowing tossed at my head, it is easily forgiven as we slink deeper into this story. We get a brief glimpse of guns and the sight of some people being led away with them and that’s when we get a piece of the timeline.

    We’re told Don went to Afghanistan to document the hunt and capture of the world’s most dangerous and wanted man. I’m hooked at this point. The music is slow and haunting, the camera shot as we go down a blackened road, only lit by more night vision, gives me real reason to feel sympathetic for the man.

    For a moment Osama Bin Laden appears briefly on the screen as we get back into Don’s story. We get some information that he’s going to be meeting a bounty hunter, they cut to a scene of a struggle in a room full of weaponry, and then we get another “beware” message from one of Don’s travel companions that just cry out, “Danger, Will Robinson!” And just before you think you know what’s going to happen, it does. We get masked gunman on the screen, not unlike those who have chillingly been part of our real lives through the deeds of terrorists in the past couple of weeks, yelling and screaming with their guns at the ready.

    Things go black.

    The next thing to appear on screen is a shot of Don, through night vision, as words on the screen let us know that Larson and his crew disappear without a trace. Things go quiet until, bam, gunfire rings out.

    We get Don handling a Kalashnikov like some mad pimp daddy in a drive-by, we get him running away, we see him using the butt of his gun to hit something, tracer bullets crisscross the night sky, the sounds of battle sound too real, I even think I see a man on a camel spray gunfire in Don’s general direction, and then the first RPG hits. Crap is flying everywhere, it’s chaotic, there are screams from every direction, and there is even another RPG that smacks into a car as Don and his team try to a get away from his aggressors that impress the hell out of me for its realism. It’s here where we’re informed that it’s not until weeks later after these skirmishes Larson’s video tapes and voice recorder are found in an Al Qaeda cave. The screen is hushed with Don’s voice saying he knows he’s doing the right thing by being there. And just when you think it’s over, another RPG rears its ugly face as it careens into the side of a building.

    I love the premise, I think the filmmakers saw what could be possible if you stuffed a pseudo-documentary full of realism and then ratcheted up the tension and have made an indie flick that I am screaming out to see. It’s not enough to say this film has some relevance in this day and age but it looks like a film that looks fun, will initially have people asking if it’s real or not, and will blur the line between fantasy and reality.

    June 18, 2004

    Trailer Park: I Think I’m Turning Japanese

    Filed under: Columns,Trailer Park — admin @ 4:56 pm

    E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES

    By Christopher Stipp

    June 18, 2004

    I THINK I’M TURNING JAPANESE

    The Japanese get all the good stuff.

    They get the sweet electronic gadgets before we do, have impeccably clean cities, have all the great seafood, make insanely great cars (can I get a Bubba Rubb woo woo on this?), and they actually posses a trailer for I, ROBOT that does not invoke any hatred, whatsoever, from me against Will Smith’s character. I am still trying to figure out what angle Fox is working, domestically, to sell this thing. Are they wanting a jovial MIBII Smith, a more serious, fighter pilot, INDEPENDENCE DAY Smith, or are they looking for the bad mutha he plays perfectly in the new Japanese trailer? Fox will get its act together about this sooner or later but they have a wonderful trailer for this movie and it would be a shame to let others in another country enjoy the spoils of a marginally well put together sci-fi flick.

    In other news, DONNIE DARKO is getting a trailer push to go along with its theatrical run. I would have included it here as a review but most of you who pride yourself on watching copious amounts of movies have already seen it and those who haven’t don’t know what it’s like to have a movie that most every God-fearing, movie going citizen (people like my friends who loved BRUCE ALMIGHTY and think that a film like FOG OF WAR is for history majors) would absolutely hate or feel a great amount of anger towards you for subjecting them to its power. Without a doubt DONNIE is one of the best well-ignored-by-the-mainstream movies to have been made in the last ten years. I am hoping that the 20+ minutes of footage will help me understand things a little better. If you have seen it, see it in theaters. If you haven’t, and it comes even remotely close to the basement of your parents house where you live, get those in your clique who appreciate your weird movie sensibilities and catch it. I believe I found a new appreciation for “Mad World” by Tears for Fears and Patrick Swayze because of it.

    That’s pretty much it from me in the way of trailers that needed a little extra scrutiny this week. Speaking of scrutiny, check out the review for the new ALIEN VS. PREDATOR movie. I know, I know, I thought it would suck harder than a Lewinsky 7000, but I loved the trailer. On top of that, the trailer for EXORCIST: THE BEGINNING is by far one of the best teasers I’ve seen all week. Not a whole lot is shown, but what is shown is used to great effect.


    WIMBLEDON (2004) Director: Richard Loncraine
    Cast: Kirsten Dunst, Paul Bettany, Sam Neill, Jon Favreau
    Release: September 24, 2004
    Synopsis: Peter Colt (Bettany) is an unlucky guy, scoring “love” both professionally and personally. Seeded near the bottom of the world tennis ranks, he manages to score a wild card, allowing him to play in the prestigious Wimbledon tournament. There, he meets and falls in love with American tennis star Lizzie Bradbury (Dunst). Fueled by a mixture of his newfound luck, love and on-court prowess, Peter works his way up the ranks of the tournament players and actually stands a chance of fulfilling his lifelong dream of winning the men’s singles title – if his luck can just hold out.
    View Trailer:
    * Small (Windows Media, QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Negative. Thank you to everyone who made this trailer possible. You’ve saved me two full price admissions.

    After watching the trailer for WIMBELDON a few times, not believing what I was seeing, I consulted a few people to get a read on things and, sure enough, it’s true. I broke it down to what was in this trailer. In this thing we have Paul “Yeah, Even I Still Can’t Believe Jennifer Connelly Wants Some Of This” Bettany, looking very trim and not too off-putting with those eyes of his. Then there is Kirsten Dunst who, for my money, has a wonderful everywoman look about her, although, really, do even I believe she looks like someone who would be able to compete in one of these tournaments? There is suspension of disbelief and then there’s the reality of Anna Kournikova’s record as a professional tennis player. We also get Sam Neil and even Jon Favreau in this thing, two names that should immediately put confidence in me that this is a quality ensemble piece, not even mentioning this film is from the same folks who brought us BRIDGET JONES’S DIARY and NOTTING HILL.

    And that’s when it hit me: yeah, the reason why I can’t endorse a trailer like this is because I saw the whole movie unfold right before my eyes, in sequential order no less. The people here didn’t even bother to mix crap up like a Rubik’s cube to throw me off the scent.

    See, and I’ll do this as swiftly as possible from front to back, Paul Bettany is a tennis chap “who never rose to the top” and who had snide comments tossed at him for being a marginal professional player. He gets fed up, ostensibly, for being so average and holds a press conference to say he’s retiring. Not a lot of people are there and the press becomes more interested in the hip, happening, new hotness of some other player who just happens to crash Paul’s conference. We all are supposed to, I take it, feel sorry for the lad as he’s on his way out, and while he’s training to just give it one last shot, Kirsten Dunst comes in and flirts with the man. She and he hit it off as The Cars’ “Just What I Needed” (ironic as both Paul and Ric Ocasek, inexplicably, ended up with hot looking wives) plays in the background while a whole lot of smooching goes on. Sam Neil thinks Paul is a distraction (Oooh”¦the disapproving father; haven’t seen this clichéd character for a while), Paul somehow gets better and vastly more popular, Jon Favreau drops in on the scene, hopefully, to provide some gentle comedic relief, and then we’re told that this movie is from the same upstanding chaps who brought BRIDGET and NOTTING into our theaters.

    Oh yeah, I almost forgot, U2’s “Everlasting Love” plays in the background as Paul gives it all he’s got to make the big play or big smash or whatever the hell it takes for him to either: 1) win Wimbledon (against all the odds, of course) and keep Kirsten as his lady 2) drive her away, initially, but then lose Wimbledon on purpose because he just can’t live without her or 3) loses Wimbledon anyway and keeps Kirsten. Should Paul end up spurning some willing poon like Kirsten in this film, which I didn’t see any indication of, or if one of them has an undiagnosed brain tumor that pops right before the winning point is made, I would gladly pony up the cash to see this thing start-to-finish. For right now, though, I’ve seen the whole movie. Thank you, though, really, as this has now saved me from being dragged to this flick later this summer; if the danger of having to endure this film comes any closer to becoming a reality I plan on simply showing this trailer and satisfying everyone’s need to see all the amazing possibilities that could possibly happen in this flick.


    FRIDAY NIGHT LIGHTS (2004) Director: Peter Berg
    Cast: Billy Bob Thornton
    Release: October 15, 2004
    Synopsis: Based on the best-selling book about high school football by H.G. Bissinger, Friday Night Lights chronicles the entire 1988 season of the Permian High Panthers of Odessa, Texas, with football players, coaches, mothers, fathers, pastors, boosters, fans and families struggling with ongoing personal conflicts while the team fights for a state championship.
    A town for sale, Odessa, Texas has seen better days – the financial bust evident in its boarded-up shops and broken lives. Yet one hope sustains the community where, once a week during the fall, the town and its dreams come alive beneath the dazzling and disorienting Friday night lights”¦when the Permian High Panthers take to the field. In a city where economic uncertainty has eroded the spirit of its inhabitants, nearly everyone seeks comfort in the religion of the Friday night ritual, where the unfulfilled dreams of an entire community are shifted onto the shoulder pads of a team of high school athletes.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (Quick Time, Windows Media)

    Prognosis: 4th and long. The first thing I asked myself when watching this thing was, “how is this different from any other sports flick?”

    I had just come off of seeing the trailer for WIMBELDON and was actually trying to envision sports movies that have had some resonance with not only me but of the larger movie going public at large. RUDY came to mind quickly, trailing with BRAIN’S SONG, and, hell, even MAJOR LEAGUE has secured a place in my own pantheon of go-to sports films because of the people, characters, who inhabit the outlining plot. Even the trailer, when you look at it, for ANY GIVEN SUNDAY showed a film that had that certain something that made people respond.

    Want to know the secret to making a good sports film? You need to fill those around the periphery of the given sport with personal history, relevance, and give everyone a reason why someone should care about them; you are developing a sports team and you need to endear the players to those who will be their fan base. All the above films, with the exception of WIMBELDON, do that. Films like REMEMBER THE TITANS showcase cardboard clichés and derivative subplots with the players that feel forced and lifeless. I didn’t want to see any of them win any sort of game, to be completely honest. This line of reasoning is what, I feel, makes the trailer for this flick a mixed bag. Showing brief glimpses of high school footballers out of their pads is an excellent selling point but having Billy Bob coming off as the prototypical, eat nails, shit bullets kind of football coach just comes off as having a “so what” feeling.

    The movie seems to be selling a drama rather than a straight sports film, and that’s fine, but the people who have to carry this thing have to be the players. If the movie becomes a quagmire of bombastic rants from Billy Bob like “make no mistake about it, gentleman, we are in the business of winning” only threaten to make this film just another depiction of how much football means to him, to the kids he coaches, to the community at large, etc… There should have been a better reason given why I should feel compelled to see what happens to those guys on the field who are the real focus of the film. From what I saw of them, and their moments, I would agree that I am interested. From what I saw of Billy Bob? Move along down the line, please, and stand next to Coach Denzel. Waving verbal testosterone around like the hard ass he is trying to be only really works for guys like John Goodman in REVENGE OF THE NERDS.

    Peter Berg, the man behind the lens, did a great job with the RUNDOWN but, really, what was evocative about his directorial work? It was the Rock and Sean William Scott who brought a modicum of popularity the film so let’s hope the guys on the team in FRIDAY NIGHT LIGHTS can make something happen worth cheering for.


    ZHOU YU’S TRAIN (2004) Director: Sun Zhou
    Cast: Gong Li, Tony Leung Ka Fai, Chen Quing, Sun Hong Lei
    Release: July 2, 2004 (Limited)
    Synopsis: Zhou Yu, a ceramic artisan in China’s rural Northwest, has a deep rapport with Chen Qing, a shy sensitive poet. Taking a long train ride every weekend just to make mad passionate love with him, her longing seems insatiable. Until one day, she meets the hedonistic vet Zhang Qiang and begins a torrid affair, which takes her to another train station, and another level of lust. Driven by the locomotive of love and desire, she hustles through a dark tunnel of no return.
    View Trailer:
    * Large (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Positive. Why should I take on something when no one speaks any ingles?

    The above comment is a good question and one that gets asked countless times when I mention I want to see a foreign language film based on its trailer. The same thing happened when I saw the promos running for AMELIE and then for IN THE MOOD FOR LOVE, both movies, I might add, were on my Best Of list at year’s end. Hell, when talking about IN THE MOOD FOR LOVE the film warranted enough interest that he fine people at Criterion put out a special edition of the film that still stands as one of my favorite DVD’s to date.

    Having said this, and realizing that the core audience for a movie like this, by default, needs motivated people who can read, it behooves me to save this movie from being trampled in the glut of tent poles this season by saying a few things about the trailer.

    First, and let me be completely honest, I don’t know where the trailer company kidnapped the guy doing the voice over for this thing but he needs to either have his mouth duct taped and have a fancy scroll across the screen instead or there needs to be a new version cut for this trailer without his voice because it is awful. Second, what is up with the music changes? First I think I’m listening to something from Peter and the Wolf, the next, I think I’m in a velvety chair listening to classical music in a big hall.

    Music notwithstanding the trailer blocks everything perfectly. From the opening of the train in the distance and then establishing that this film’s star is the same woman from FAREWELL MY CONCUBINE, another great film, the makers of this film quickly make it known they’re not some schmoes who fell off a movie wagon in Taiwan. However, the music playing in the background is sucking at my soul by this point, and I’m just barely paying attention to the visuals, when there is a shift in tempo, presentation.

    Our heroine, the woman who is the reason to see this movie, gingerly holds a white cup in her hands. The cinematography is working very subtly as it goes from her to a dude, a writer who digs her, to another dude, who digs her as well, and it gives the vibe that things are not going to be going well by the third reel. This is confirmed, if only hinted at, by the way she cavorts with both men as if playfully trying on robes. Just as I’m investing myself in this film, the oboes kick in and I curse Valhalla for having me endure this egregious audio assault. It’s of no matter however, as the story plays out in front of me, everything from the physical space you can feel between her and the men she’s investing herself with, the use of the train as a visual symbol for her journey, the way she gets it on with some faceless man (this warrants a big plus from the Peanut Gallery in my limbic system), and the slo-mo movement and lingering gaze of the camera on her groove thing as the sound of the train plays out in the background are all inciting. I am happy that the violins come back before this trailer is done but it is of no consequence as this is a film most anyone with a passion for subtitles should make an effort to see. That is unless you read reviews and it turns out the film is absolute dreck, in which case, go rent SHANGHAI EXPRESS.


    ALIEN VS. PREDATOR (2002) Director: Paul Anderson
    Cast: Sanaa Lathan, Raoul Bova, Lance Henriksen, Ewen Bremner
    Release: August 13, 2004
    Synopsis: The iconic monsters from two of the scariest film franchises ever, battle each other on Earth for the first time on film. The discovery of an ancient pyramid buried in Antarctica sends a team of scientists and adventurers to the frozen continent. There, they make an even more terrifying discovery: two alien races engaged in the ultimate battle. No matter who wins, we lose.
    View Trailer:
    * Large (Quick Time)

    Prognosis: Positive. I didn’t think it would happen, to be completely honest.

    When I heard this movie was getting made I, too, rolled my eyes and cursed every money grubbing suit attached to this project that connived to get this thing made. Things that slowly trickled out and about this film’s production wasn’t helping at all either. From the vague promo posters, the really vague teaser trailers, even the name on everything, AVP, sounded more like an off-road vehicle I should want to take out and really “open “˜er up” in the backwoods of Illinois; this was not sounding like a movie I needed go see. Then, finally, a trailer worth commenting on has made its way to the surface.

    It’s not bad and that speaks volumes with a movie like this.

    The trailer does things right by opening with a black screen and having only the sound of a predator echo in the background. We next get a group of people, ostensibly to become food for either alien race, investigating the area that seems to have brought the two big boys together in one, centralized sandbox. My take on this expeditionary crew is that they should warrant nothing more than ravenous cries at the screen to “get them good!” while hopefully providing a modicum of bad acting and bad lines. My expectations don’t fail me as one of them mentions, before everything kicks into high gear, “did you hear that?” Yes I did, sister, and it is called your death knell.

    We get a flashy look at a drooling Alien and a steel faced predator as they both look at each other as if Don King is going to rip through the black background to say this will be the biggest fight known to man and to call my local cable provider to order it today. I cannot tell you how much frothy anger I would level at this thing if it left things like this. I would be upset. But it doesn’t and somewhere in the distance the spirit of 80’s nu metal overtakes the music in this trailer as things slowly pull me in further.

    We next get a shot of the predators looking pimp as all get out as they slowly walk up some step; a separate shot of an alien embryo hatching (I could watch an entire film of those bad ass things attaching themselves to people’s faces, shoving eggs down their windpipes); a predator making short work of the mini-aliens; a quick shot of the prey caught in the middle (don’t feel bad for them, just be thankful they’ll provide some comic relief); a full-on HR Giger alien; a predator holding a disk with blades (I loved KRULL! I knew my letter writing campaign to get this weapon back into the movies would pay off.); a predator unsheathing some blades from their wrist, Wolverine-style (From X-MEN to ROBOCOP to I COME IN PEACE, crap coming out of people’s arms never ever gets old); and then we get an alien looking all sorts of pissed.

    Cut to the prey caught up in this melee, and seemingly trapped in the alien egg room (see comments above concerning interest in said item) as one of the two utters, “what did you say this room was called?” Before you retort “your burial chamber, you beeyotch” a flurry of quick clips overtake the screen as humans are shown fighting back against everything coming at them, guns are going off, aliens are squealing like little pigs, explosions start rocking everything, and a blue sphere of energy, reminiscent of the Danger Zone cartoon series, engulfs everything.

    I like the tagline: Whoever Wins”¦We Lose. It’s cheeky but not too mindless. I appreciate the work done by Paul W.S. Anderson. While none of the love I have for his work has to do with his directorial style, if I’m being completely honest, it’s simply his ability to wade through the genre of this kind of film that makes me hopeful it won’t be a complete travesty. The trailer has now raised a modicum of expectation for me and I now want to see the finished product to determine whether he’s desecrated a franchise that had some potential about 10 years ago when this project was on every fanboy’s list of fantasy films and shared some space on the page right below FREDDY VS. JASON.


    EXORCIST: THE BEGINNING (2004) Director: Paul Schrader
    Cast: Stellan Skarsgård, Gabriel Mann, Clara Bellar, Billy Crawford
    Release:August 20, 2004
    Synopsis: Prequel to THE EXORCIST. The film traces the story of Father Lankester Merrin (Stellan Skarsgård) back to his first encounter with the Devil in post-WWII Africa.
    View Trailer:
    * Small (Windows Media)

    Prognosis: Positive. First of all, Jesus is upside down.

    Jesus is upside down and I know that not only is evil afoot, I don’t think I have ever seen that kind of thing employed in my cinematic travails. Second thing about this trailer, though, Warner is cheating at the beginning, pure and simple.

    There is no way to look at the first half of the trailer for EXORCIST: THE BEGINNING and not think that Warner Brothers is cribbing a little too liberally from the first film to generate interest in this new incarnation. Don’t misunderstand me though, as I think this trailer is tip top all the way through.

    What you notice as the Warner’s symbol turns black and white, the screen going dark, and the sound of Father Karras’ voice being the only thing you can hear is this thing starts off on a creepy note.

    “Are you comfortable, Regan?”
    “Yes.”
    “How old are you?”
    “12.”
    “Is there someone inside of you?”

    And then that dammed creepy ass breathing starts in, slowly, as Regan’s demonic eyes peer out at you. My skin starts to ripple as Father Karras asks Regan if she will, “let him answer?” The flashes of light and the sound of the response of “in time” is a real foot in the ass of all the cheap tricks employed by others who followed in this movie’s footsteps since the original. There is then a rewind of footage from the original EXORCIST as Keres makes his way from the ground level from whence he splattered, up to the window he was ejected out of, and into bedroom of Satan.

    Just when I think, though, that this is where we’ll get introduced to the new version I am held at the velvet rope a little longer as the scroll chimes in with its ominous message: Go Back Before The Beginning, To The Place Evil Was Born. Oddly, the music loops backward, as does Brewmeister Smith’s signature walk from under the street light, clutching his satchel, ready to fight the dark side; I think I heard “Paul is dead” somewhere in that audio clip.

    It’s nearly halfway done with this thing before I see anything new when I finally get a glimpse of Stellan SkarsgÃ¥rd.There is lightning, thunder, the sound of a church bell, and a quick look at the underground lair where most of everything else happens in this trailer. There is a great shot of a barren land with small crucifixes imbedded into the ground like a bunched up gravesite as a voice over from one of the actors says, “I was sent here to see if the legend was real.” Stellan is then shown going down deep into a cavern as another voice clip adds, “after the war in heaven, this is the spot where Lucifer fell.” We get more lighting, almost being played to the point of distraction, but then there is a clip of a mirror breaking, a chick in just a towel (what was the question?) screaming because of something, we get Jesus jus’ chillin’ upside-down, someone shouts “the power of Christ compels you,” Stellen holds up a lantern, and then Stellan’s voice states simply, quietly, “Joseph. Run.” What I know about the directing of this film was that Paul Schrader had directed the original incarnation of this thing and even had a slew of internet journalists to visit the set. Everything was in place to make this a well-known film and then the unthinkable, but plausible, happened: the suits at Warner’s were very displeased with the final product. They literally took the film away from Schrader, gave it to Renny “I know good film” Harlin, took Caleb Carr and William Wisher Jr.’s script and had it rewritten by Skip Woods and Alexi Hawley. The whole film was reshot. The whole film. The power of Christ may very well indeed be needed to exorcise the demons out of this thing but I am anxious to see what they have done.

    June 11, 2004

    Trailer Park: I Wanna Be, Wanna Be, Like Mike

    Filed under: Columns,Trailer Park — admin @ 4:55 pm

      E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES

    By Christopher Stipp

    June 11, 2004

    I WANNA BE, WANNA BE, LIKE MIKE

    There is a battle of wills going on here.

    In one corner you have the very public, gotta-see-it flick FAHRENHEIT 911 about to hit in theaters in just a couple of weeks. It’s been an amazing twist of events, or a well-orchestrated coup, however you’d like to view it, and the trailer proves that the wait may very well the hype. However, is it edutainment or is it pure fact? Being Michael Moore, you have to factor in some elements of shock, pop science and a little smattering of biased viewpoints. It’s really an enjoyable mix and I don’t begrudge Moore an inch for the way he presents his material. Hell, if something like a documentary on the nature of gun violence in America could easily win the Academy Award, Frontline on PBS would be washing themselves in a bathtub full of statuettes. The trailer looks just as entertaining as the movie is supposed to be and you can consider me and my $8.75 as a minor contributor to the overall total for whatever this film pulls in.

    In the other corner, you have Mike Wilson who is a young moviemaker looking to make a name for himself in the industry by directing a documentary, revealing Moore’s techniques for creative fact-telling. Wilson also wants to show an America unlike the one that Moore portrays in his previous films and gets some fairly big names, of both the celebrity and political variety, to help him along in his quest.

    This looks like a good, old-fashioned cat fight. Of course, the timing couldn’t be more right for Wilson, who could leech some of the publicity away from Moore as he makes his rounds for FAHRENHEIT’s junketeering. Stay tuned to see how well both fare in the open market. While I realize there is no fighting going on with either director, you should see both trailers and see what angles both of them are playing. I like them both but that’s only because I have competing voices in my head that are in constant battle for supremacy.

    In other news, this week’s Have-to-see-it-to-believe-it clip-o-de-week goes to SAW. I have no idea what the hell is going in that trailer but it’s got Danny Glover and Carey Elwes in it and looks like derangement of the highest order. The trailer site says it has some disturbing content (stating this will always get some attention from me when you put a label like that on it) but apart from having a hot lady almost losing her head in a booby-trapped device (which isn’t shown happening, if you’re wondering) there isn’t anything more offensive in the rest of it. They’re wussies and I’m p.o’ed that there wasn’t anymore “disturbing content.”


    FAHRENHEIT 9/11 (2004) Director:Michael Moore
    Cast: Michael Moore, George W. Bush
    Release: June 25, 2004
    Synopsis: Michael Moore examines what happened to the United States after September 11; and how the Bush Administration used the tragic event to push its agenda. It’s a documentary that will trace why the U.S. has become a target for hatred and terrorism. It will also depict alleged dealings between two generations of the Bush and bin Laden clans that led to George W. Bush and Osama bin Laden becoming mortal enemies.
    View Trailer:
    * Large (QuickTime)
    Prognosis: Positive. “You can make people do anything if they’re afraid.”

    I like this trailer immensely for the method and the execution of its message. It gets in quick, is cheeky in all the ways that makes this politico/documentary/easy-to-understand film palpable to anyone who can manage to digest a USA Today, hits you with a sock full of quarters as it breaks things down provocatively if nothing else, and where you will you find one of the best endings I’ve seen in a trailer all year. Well, that last part was a bit of an exaggeration; that honor goes to DAWN OF THE DEAD but I promise next time I’ll research my facts better next time before making an assertion like that.

    One of the issues people have with Moore’s guerilla tactics form of documentary filmmaking is that some of the statements he makes are sometimes taken out of context, unjustly, and there are entire Web sites dedicated to the cases-in-point but here, in this trailer, we have a nice outlay of the statements he makes with some images, representations, documents, etc”¦ that start the paper trail to prove he isn’t aggrandizing his points, but is out to establish them.

    We start with a nice twinkling soundtrack (think “˜50s retro), a very brief but well-deserved mention that the film was the winner at Cannes (I’ve seen longer, lingering award mentions of lesser prizes at other film festivals so it was nice to see Moore not making it the focal point of the trailer), and the mention that this is same dude who won that naked, golden man and made those mean comments about our president. With all the pomp out of the way the trailer wastes no time with getting right into things.

    We have a few-days-old shot of a post-9/11 world with all commercial flights grounded, some file footage of a man telling us such, some actual documents flashing on screen relating to the family of Osama Bin Laden who resided in this country but were given clearance to leave the country by our own president. This is just the first shot heard round the world.

    From this landmine, we move to the ReBuilding Iraq conference where corporations lined up to talk about how they were going to exact some coinage after this pesky war was finished. Men in their ties, hotel ballroom settings as overheads flash some potential money making opportunities fill the screen as troops and their guns roll by on a dusty street somewhere in Iraq.

    We next get Moore walking up to commuting politicians in Washington D.C., asking if they wouldn’t mind helping out with his efforts to get the kids of the very same politicians he’s talking directly at to sign up for the war. After getting a look of either shock, confusion or derision, take your pick, Moore moves on to a sound bite of a politician who is sitting behind his nice looking wood desk and who says he had no idea what was in the Patriot Act he helped pass (“We don’t read most of the bills,” is his answer. Oy. Hopefully, he’s from your state.) Moore is then in an ice cream truck, telling members our Congress what the Patriot Act really says before the trailer turns up the pace by quick clipping images of soldiers on the ground in Iraq, John Ashcroft singing a cappella (it really has to be seen to be believed), middle America folks just being citizens, politicians walking away from Moore (wow, imagine that), and a real fast montage of fire, protests, guns, fallen soldiers, threat levels and, again, one of the funniest endings I’ve seen in a while.

    Having said all of this, I have no doubt the Sean Hannitys, Rush Limbaughs, Michael Medveds, and all of the self-congratulatory talking heads will come out of the woodwork to say this film is rubbish and conflicts with common sense. They’ll go on tirades, only after trying to smear Moore for his unpatriotic devotion to this country, and they’ll get some hick who only knows how to grow peanuts or make meth who’ll just get irate along with them, neither one will have seen the movie, mind you, until all concerned are whipped up into a froth. Fine. Let “˜em. If this movie was given an ounce of credibility by anyone, these men would have you believe it is still Un-American to believe that the world is a lot better off with a man in power like George W. This film looks like a great comment, a different perspective, if you will, on the state of our country today and where we’ve all been for the past few years.


    RIDING GIANTS (2004) Director:Stacy Peralta
    Cast:Darrick Doerner, Laird John Hamilton, Dave Kalama, Brian L. Keaulana, Titus Kinimaka
    Release:July 9, 2004
    Synopsis:In turns funny and spirited, often poignant and dramatic, their stories are the heart of Riding Giants. Yet in the telling comes a picture of not only these extraordinary characters, but authentic insight into the birth, development and ultimately the global appeal of the romantic, culturally significant surfing lifestyle itself. Riding Giants is driven by the same sense of freedom, the same love of nature, the similar discovery of self that all surfers seek — that all of us seek, in one form or another. Experience the breathless moments of quiet grace that, for these extraordinary adventurers, are to be achieved within their elementally violent world.
    View Trailer:
    * Large (Quick Time)
    Prognosis: Positive. A note to Bruce Brown: Thank you for making ENDLESS SUMMER 1 and 2. I saw them, dug them, still go back to watch them, have no idea why I’m transfixed like a prepubescent boy who’s found porn for the first time every time I see either one, have never picked up a surfboard, don’t really assume to understand the ethos of the average surfer, but am now hooked on trying to watch anything put to celluloid related to the sport.

    The trailer for RIDING GIANTS only seeks to continue the tradition of having solid, well-made surf movies in the purview of the public; last year’s STEP INTO LIQUID is a great example of this statement. The opening to this trailer is wonderful to look at. The slow, tinkling piano music meshes well with the scenes of lightly crashing surf. We have a nice scroll of comments that before we walked onto the moon we had dudes stepping off the edge of the earth. It’s cute if nothing else. A little hyperbole goes a long way and thankfully they leave it at that. We get the obligatory OFFICIAL SUNDANCE SELECTION badge of honor, but as it’s simply blended into the background with a warm sun it isn’t glaringly annoying, it’s tempting. What happens next is very creative.

    On the screen, time starts rolling back. The years peel off all the way into the 50’s. We get a blend of photos, movies, and 3-D looking stills of the pioneers of what, truly, we all know as modern day surfing. Is it out of line to say these guys, “were the astronauts of their day?” Not after seeing what these men accomplished it isn’t. From this point, then, there is some great back and forth of modern surfers, old school surfers, and a real sense of authority and honesty in what is being shown.

    Is it all about finding that one, ultimate wave you’ll never forget? Do surfers have it better than most when it comes to having a more centered view on the fragility of life and nature? Do guys like Anthony Kiedis and the weird eye dude from CYBORG really beat up on guys like Keanu who are just starting out like they do in POINT BREAK? I don’t know about the latter but I have to believe after seeing the trailer for this, and knowing what I do about the ENDLESS SUMMER flicks, the answer to the other questions has to be a very mellow yes.

    What’s great about the premise of the film is that this pays homage to the guys who started it all. A sport that seemingly was only a real recent development in the grand scheme of recorded time it feels like it should have been around ever since there were waves (“Hey, Mogdock, grab some of that palm tree and let’s boogie board till we have to put down that Brachiosaurus with a few rocks I’ve found.), but it hasn’t. These men, vanguards of something new, still look great and it serves as a better companion piece to the Johnny-come-latelies of the world when doing a retrospective like this. Sometimes you get the guys, or gals, of things that happened in our nation’s recent history when doing a documentary and it’s sad, even frustrating, when the subjects themselves barely know who they are much less recall, vividly, the events that led to them being interviewed in the first place. They’re not drooling on themselves and are at the perfect age for reflecting what, essentially, they began so many decades ago.


    MICHAEL MOORE HATES AMERICA (2004) Director: Michael Wilson
    Cast: Penn Jillette, Michael Moore, John Stossel
    Release: Coming Soon
    Synopsis: Michael Moore Hates America is a documentary that forces audiences to rethink the genre. It challenges conventional wisdom and takes on the top documentary filmmaker of all time. Join Mike Wilson as he travels from coast to coast in search of the American Dream, and chases down Michael Moore in an effort to figure out why the two have such different visions of America.
    View Trailer:
    * Large (QuickTime)
    Prognosis: Positive. Equal time. It feels like to me, anyway, that the biggest threat that this movie poses is that of all the same tactics used by Michael Moore to get his own movie made about Roger Smith, GM’s CEO at the time, it has now befallen a new filmmaker to seek some answers of his own about Moore’s claims about “the country, its people, and our way of life” as Americans.

    Does this guy have a point worth listening to? Yes, absolutely. Does it feel like it has its own agenda? Oh yeah, but I would like to be in that line of people to see what about Moore has this guy’s cackles all up in a bunch. For an independent documentary, and using what looks like a lot of Apple computer power, this trailer is wonderful to watch.

    “The art is persuading you to lie to yourself.” This is the line we get from some codger, much like Moore’s own wily old coot from the trailer of FAHRENHEIT 9/11, and right away the assumption is put on the table that what the guy is talking about is Moore himself.

    Some of you know my distain for words; words, that is, that come up on the screen. If you sneak a peek at any number of trailers that pop them up horribly (this week’s SAW trailer is one) you can understand why it’s so jolting. What Mike Wilson has done with a very simple program has not only made it interesting to read them, but his soundtrack selection is much appreciated and engages the viewer visually and sonically.

    We then get Michael Moore, standing up at a podium, where he is explaining to an audience at a public appearance, with Mike Wilson standing in attendance, ostensibly waiting for his moment to capture his prey. I mean, let’s not skirt the issue that seems to be pervasive throughout this entire trailer: while, yes, there seems to be a focus on showing how real America can work for its citizens there is an undercurrent of 1) demystifying Moore’s sensationalist claims if there are, indeed, any to be unearthed or exposed and 2) that the director himself, Wilson, puts forth his own agenda, good or bad, as evidenced by the company he keeps in this piece.

    As viewers of Showtime can attest, Penn Jillette makes for great conversation. Jillette and his diminutively quiet partner Teller have a series, aptly called Bullshit, that is all about getting to the root of issues like this and it does add a great sense of authority to have him in the trailer. As he simply explains his views on the nature of verbal illusion it starts the ol’ crankshaft in the cranium up for some light thinking.

    However, with anything that looks great there also comes some pointed criticism that must be addressed. As I watched this trailer I don’t know how many times a newscaster appeared on the screen and I was unsure of whom the person talking to Moore actually was. The same goes for when Wilson is talking about his film on the radio with someone from Radio America which, if you do some digging like I had to do, has some fairly conservative leanings. After raising my awareness that this was the case, and it triggered other feelings that I, myself, might be misled without having all the information in front of me it put me in a position to question the source when I should be enjoying the trailer watching experience. What comes next, though, is comedy gold.

    “I’m not in anyone else’s movies other than my own.” Out-of-context or in-context Moore is shown in an interview uttering these words when he says he would not participate in Wilson’s movie because of the previous quote. There is a funny moment as the screen goes black and white and the names of eight films where Moore did exactly that appear on the screen. I’m not sure what the hell Moore meant but, damn, if that wasn’t a great way to make point.

    Next, though, we come back to the same issue I made about the newscasters who are seen trying to rope Moore into an argument. We see Wilson talking to a very astute, well-dressed, power-tie wearing black man that speaks with the smoothness of a politician. Again, I did some digging and found that it could be J.C. Watts, a Republican, and a former member of Congress, who was at one time the fourth highest ranking Republican in the House of Representatives. Now, you have a guy like this on the screen and yet there is no label to point out who the man is. I’m not saying it is him and I might be completely wrong, maybe it was some schmo Wilson picked out at a Lexmark printer conference, but I’m obviously starving here for some clarification of who is doing the talking in this trailer.

    After that we move onto real rural America where a black woman breaks down her vision of what America means to her, an immigrant discusses what his idea of the Dream means to him, and then we get some guy from Flint, Michigan telling us what it will take to rebuilt the city left hollow after GM left the state and collapsed the town’s economy. We then cut to Wilson at the very same public appearance from the beginning of the trailer and we get him trying to get Moore for 45 minutes to do an interview, ostensibly, for this documentary. What Wilson gets in return for the request was to be expected.

    Even though I feel this film just seems to the Right correcting the Left both sides here are culpable for having their own agendas, just like Jillette points out in the trailer about the nature of lying, and its best when you understand the source of every piece of information that’s given to you. Always consider the source. I would recommend this flick as standard issue third eye cleansing ointment as a check and balance to Moore’s films. People can get caught up siding in one camp (Liberal, Republicaian, Democrat, Transgender, Homophobe, Dolly Parton Fan Club Member) or another and this movie serves, to paraphrase the MIGHTY MIGHTY BOSSTONES, to question the answers were given and not become sheep when presented a novel idea that fits nicely in our world view.


    AVIATOR (2002) Director: Martin Scorsese
    Cast: Leonardo DiCaprio, Cate Blanchett, John C. Reilly, Kate Beckinsale, Jude Law, Adam Scott, Kelli Garner, Gwen Stefani, Nellie Sciutto, Alec Baldwin, Danny Huston, Matt Ross, Ian Holm, Alan Alda, Frances Conroy, Vincent Laresca, Justin Shilton, Brent Spiner, Josie Maran, Sam Hennings, Willem Dafoe, Stanley DeSantis
    Release: November 5, 2004
    Synopsis: The Aviator tells the story of aviation pioneer Howard Hughes (Leonardo DiCaprio), the eccentric billionaire industrialist and Hollywood film mogul famous for romancing some of the world’s most beautiful women. The drama recounts the years of his life from the late 1920s through the 1940s, an epoch when Hughes was directing movies and test flying innovative aircraft he designed and created. It also chronicles Hughes’ struggle with his physical disabilities and phobias, and his increasingly erratic, obsessive-compulsive behavior that led him ultimately to isolate himself from his associates and withdraw from the world.
    View Trailer:
    * Small (Quick Time, AOL Media Player)
    Prognosis: Positive. Ok, THE BEACH sucked but, c’mon, will Leo ever star in anything that might be mistaken for anything set in contemporary times? His career seems to exist in a time machine dated for the early half of last century. It’s not a matter worth dwelling on, however, as long as Marty, Steven or Cameron helm the pic and are directing this, dare I say, Dorian Gray-like man, through a movie that looks crisp, clean and extremely interesting. One of the issues, though, if you can look past it, is Leo’s inability to distinguish himself from looking like Frank Abagnale Jr.; the slick looking hair, the period specific clothing, and even his voice. All that is of little issue, however, as this movie looks like an easy sell to some segment of the population that will appreciate this period piece and won’t even think twice they’ve seen Leo like this before. The look of the film, going for a true representation of the time in which Howard Hughes lived, looks absolutely gorgeous. I would have liked to soak them all in but there are way too many clips that dine and dash without leaving a whole of room for interpretation. The first half of the trailer is mostly concerned with telling the story of Howard made his way from the movie set to the plane hangar so we get some of the more glamorous Hollywood visuals.

    After Mr. Toad’s Wild Trailer Ride takes a breather, more towards the middle, we get a thickly painted make-up job on Kate Beckinsale who, for my movie money, would make me go insane and become a recluse too if I somehow missed out on making that sweet situation last a lifetime. And that’s the other thing. What’s a bio pic on Hughes without the lunacy? I’m not holding it against Scorsese, but, damn, what fun that would have been to see a ragged Leo? Him all haggard as he hobbles from Nicaragua to England to Canada to Mexico would most definitely get my viewing attention. However, apart from the greased over look he seems to have cribbed from all his other flicks set between 1900-1950, Leo really impresses here in the trailer as a youthful Hughes if I am to give into believing it’s him. His outbursts of anger, frustration, and love feel genuine even as the schmaltzy piano music dances in the background. One of the things I did not appreciate, however, as I was slowly drawn into Leo’s performance was the flash of Gwen Stefani at his side. I don’t know why some people think they deserve to become an actress because that’s such a novel thing to do these days, and this whole cross-career building should only be limited to Hugh Jackman who just proved Wolverine can high step with the best of them as he sang “Ain’t It Awesome I Just Won a Tony” and to Bo Jackson, the latter being the contemporary OG of effective career switch hitting. And it’s all of a sudden, too. LeoLeoLeo, bam, “that’s the chick in the “˜Don’t Speak’ video!” I believe her visage will sell a few tickets to fanboys of hers but, damn, was it necessary?

    By the time a plane clips the side of a house and you get a crying babe on the edge of the bed, as a shirtless Leo makes a brief appearance, I’ve already figured out this trailer is all over the place with its imagery. There does seem like there is a progression of events that’s being revealed but it all happens so fast. All you have to go off of is what your mind lingers on as the last images from .034 seconds ago quickly dissolve in your frontal lobe as they make way for more. The clips are great, stunning, all these things and more, but unless Leo is carrying C-4 on his back and is planning to take down the entire city of Washington as the pop/punk/poseur band Good Charlotte plays a generic riff with words that say COMING SUMMER OF 2006 there is absolutely no need for this kind of visual assault. However, Marty does get a pass because of a couple things:

    1. Leo just looks good; he does and I have to bite my teeth to say it. His role in CATCH ME IF YOU CAN is the sole basis of this decision because of its sameness and I enjoy getting caught up in that movie whenever I see it on HBO.
    2. Kate Beckinsale. Damn. If only all moms looked this good.
    3. The story looks engaging and there is more than enough evidence that there is something here that looks yards better than WHITE CHICKS.
    4. It’s Martin Martin Scorsese. The man has yet to disappoint. Some of you may throw meat cleavers at that comment for GANGS OF NEW YORK but the man is the quintessential benchmark of dependable movie making compared to the Brett Ratners of the world.


    SAW (2004) Director: James Wan
    Cast: Tobin Bell, Cary Elwes, Danny Glover, Dina Meyer, Monica Potter
    Release:September 17, 2004
    Synopsis: When Adam is jolted back to consciousness after nearly drowning at the bottom of a decrepit bathtub, he awakes to find himself chained to a rusty pipe inside a dark torture chamber. There is someone else in the room. Dr. Lawrence Gordon has also just regained consciousness and is chained to the opposite side of the space. Between them a man is lying in a pool of blood after apparently shooting himself in the head with the pistol in his hand. Adam and Dr. Gordon piece together the clues left behind by the deranged criminal mind that has brought them together and finally realize that they, too, must make a seemingly impossible set of choices for their lives.
    View Trailer:
    * Small, Medium, Large (QuickTime, Windows Media)
    Prognosis: Positive. By far the most expedient minute and thirty seconds you’ll experience this week will be spent in the form of the trailer for SAW. For those not in the know, and you can count me as one of them prior to my first viewing of this thing, the movie looks to be as deranged and driven by a pure desire to have everything drip with cinematic dirtiness than anything else I’ve seen in many months.

    It starts out nice enough, Danny Glover (still one of the greats when not trying to act like he could kick Jet Li’s ass in LEATHAL WEAPON 4) is sitting down with a woman who looks like the shaking leather man from SEVEN who was forced to copulate with a fine lady while wearing a device better utilized to cut though tin cans while still managing to be able and slice through tomatoes. She sits there shaking while Danny asks what the woman remembers. Remembers about what? The images that follow are very interesting.

    The camera shakes out of focus a bit, some slight static fills the screen as our heroine wears what looks like a rusty deep sea diving/football helmet and is strapped in a chair which looks stolen, no less, from a Nine Inch Nails video shoot. In fact, the green light that everyone seems to be bathed in is a nice mood setter as is the TV monitor where the evil man with the Fisher Price Voice Changer 2000 behind it all talks though a chattering puppet on a video screen.

    Then, like a ticked out version of Fear Factor, Contestant #1 in the chair is told that she has a booby trapped death inducer on her face and unless she digs into the stomach of her motionless cellmate to get the key within 60 seconds there is no way for her to get the contraption off her face without everything else going with it. She immediately beats a path to the man and holds up a small Swiss Army knife over the guy like a battered Patricia Arquette from TRUE ROMANCE and before she plunges it deep into the recesses of the guy’s spleen her cellmate seems to be faking as he pulls one eye open. She arches her back and the scene changes.

    What is annoying, though, if there is such a thing with this trailer, that should be a hit with any male between twelve and twenty five, is some annoying lime green scroll that tells me “How Messed Up Is That?” as this nameless lady is about to go killer wild on the guy. I couldn’t have said it better myself, Cochise, and, thanks to you, the mood has now turned comical. However, not all is lost as she comes down hard and the trailer starts throwing up images too fast to piece together. But, if you happen to have an affinity for the pause button and sample all the flashed pics in this thing you would be amazed at how gritty, dank and overall nasty everything feels. It’s great and I know another movie like this won’t be on the horizon anytime soon. The very inclusion of Glover makes this warped “horror” flick a must-see.

    The fast paced nature of this trailer is exactly the right formula for film like this. By giving people the feeling of high paced action with a thrilling premise, even though it isn’t really spelled out what the hell is going on, you have done your job with the trailer. The movie as a whole, however, falls on someone else’s shoulders to deliver. The director to this thing, James Wan, has the shortest IMDB listing I’ve ever been privy to. His résumé has exactly one thing on it: SAW. Good thing? Bad thing? We soon shall know.

    One other point I’d like to make is that this has Cary Elwes in it, although you would barely know it by seeing the trailer. Elwes will always hold a special place to me as the man who rescued Buttercup from the evil Prince Humperdinck. THE PRINCESS BRIDE was a watershed in developing my cinematic lexicon and I have enjoyed watching his even keel career putter along at a pontoon’s pace. While I know he will never achieve the stature of other, more popular culture friendly actors, the man has managed to run the gamut of everything from comedy to thriller and now to horror. Count me in even before you take a headcount.

    June 4, 2004

    Trailer Park: Under The Knife

    Filed under: Columns,Trailer Park — admin @ 4:54 pm

    E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES

    By Christopher Stipp

    June 4, 2004

    UNDER THE KNIFE

    There have been some great follow-ups lately in the land of Trailerdom.

    Usually, as is the case most of the times, there is a revamp of trailers that first run with films to the ones that are playing on the television the week a movie is released. There are trailers that will never improve, some that needed a serious re-cut, and others that are fine just the way they are.

    In the case of never improving, there is a new trailer that has been cut for WHITE CHICKS. Now, instead of just getting a casual glance of the Wayan’s brothers dolled up in white face and blonde wigs, you now get a closer look at the boys in their makeup. I don’t know if it was just the scale of the image but you can see their eyes in the new trailers. Their eyes have blue contacts that make them, and I am not exaggerating, look like the old school Hulk right before he ripped through Banner’s clothes. It’s those creepy vampire eyes. And it’s not like it’s a passing glance, either. It’s a full-on close-up. I wasn’t sure if it’s supposed to be funny or if it’s supposed to scare me to death. Vacillating between either of these scenarios is not a good thing, just in case you’re wondering.

    Even though it hasn’t changed my mind to see it I, ROBOT now has a new trailer and it is vastly better than the first one that hit weeks ago. There is less of Will Smith mugging for the camera, but I’ve seen the other side and it doesn’t change a thing for me. To those who are seeing it for the first time, and in theaters, the new trailer is a lot better sell. Thumbs up, though, to the studio for cutting a better trailer.

    And from the department of Didn’t Need Any Changing To Begin With we have GARDEN STATE. This is, far and away, next to SPIDER-MAN 2, the one film I am very excited to catch in July when it opens. Too often it can seem everyone follows the same formula for trailers but with music from The Postal Service and Travis, the internet-only trailer that is running for this film is one of the best examples right now of trailers done right. If you need a hand in the right direction, you can find the trailer at:

    http://www.apple.com/trailers/fox_searchlight/garden_state/internet_exclusive/

    This week, however, give some love to MARIA FULL OF GRACE and my choice pick of the week, JU-ON. Scary stuff in thet thar trailer.

    Things are heating up this summer, and this is the time for a glut of trailers to appear online, so if you happen to come across a trailer that happens to go live while you’re trolling for porn just shoot me a message.

    .


    LADDER 49 (2004) Director: Jay Russell
    Cast: Joaquin Phoenix, John Travolta, Jacinda Barrett, Billy Burke, Kevin Chapman, Morris Chestnut, Scott Cooper, Kevin Daniels, Balthazar Getty, Tim Guinee, Brooke Hamlin, Jay Hernandez, Robert Patrick
    Release: October 8, 2004
    Synopsis: LADDER 49 is about a firefighter named Jack (Phoenix) who awaits rescue from a burning building. There, he reflects on his career, wife and family. Travolta will play Kennedy, Jack’s captain who is made fire chief. He sees his firehouse, which includes rookie Jack, as a tight-knit family.
    View Trailer:
    * Large (QuickTime)
    Prognosis: Weak Positive/Slightly Negative. This thing opens with a building fully engulfed in a blaze of orange flame and smoke. While this appeals to the pyro in me, there are some things about the new trailer for LADDER 49 that just leave me not knowing whether or not I care about what happens to the people who are most likely caught inside.Having any kind of crap burn or sizzle is a great way to begin a trailer. What follows after this, however, is nothing special and is the usual fare that we would get out of a movie dealing with firemen: guys sliding down poles, men suited up in their garb as they walk through burning buildings, hoses unfurled and ready for action, water splattering in every direction, and then there’s John Travolta, giving a voice over which sounds like he gargled with a fistful of gravel right before the voice work, slo-mo walking like the badass boss everyone on the force respects and admires. Is the latter believable? Well, he does try to bring a sense of bravado throughout the trailer, but ends up with mixed results.

    To make it feel like this is a real firehouse, with real guys, and not one populated with pansy poseurs, we get a look at the men of Ladder 49. We get a rockin’ A-chord musical intro with the camera panning on the firehouse as Joaquin “There Isn’t a Damn Thing Wrong With My Lip” Phoenix, an obvious scrub new to the crew of veteran firefighters. Joaquin is the newbie that is followed in the first series of clips as he learns his place in fireman society. We get him finding his way through a fire, enduring practical jokes from his fellow firefighters, and we even get a shot of some of the guys singing karaoke (“Fire” no less). The latter brings to mind the movie S.W.A.T. where the crew starts singing the theme song to the old series. I don’t understand the phenomenon. I don’t sing the song about “Being Stuck In A Cube For 10 Hours A Day And Sometimes You Never Get A Lunch” when I’m with my buddies huddled around the EZ-Bake-Oven trying to reheat last night’s spaghetti, but it’s Hollywood so I’ll let it slide and believe in my own special way that guys like this love to sing about their jobs. However, this is when things get a little soft.

    There are clips of a tuxedoed Joaquin getting married, more hilarity ensuing as Joaquin gets the ol’ Gatorade over the head trick (those silly firefighters), Joaquin getting hugged by another one of his buddies (can you feel the love so far in this thing?), Joaquin saving the life of someone trapped in a building (he gets some more patting on the back), and we even get a touching moment where his son says he doesn’t want to see his dad get hurt (aww”¦he says it in his jammies too”¦). With the ephemeral boys club atmosphere secured with the ever-present hint of danger out of the way we get the real meat of the story. The main set piece seems to be set against a 20 story building that happens to be en fuego and this is when it actually gets interesting.

    There are tons, literally, of fire trucks and lights and water gushing out in every direction against the building which looks closer to Arkham Asylum than it does anything else. There’s screaming, great interiors of fire swallowing the place, some verbal male bravado (“I’m not leaving until you leave!”) thrown around, Joaquin gets into danger as the guy the crew has to save, all the while Travolta shows himself to be the fearless leader by telling the rest of the firefighters they’re gonna get him out alive. It would be fine to leave things here and tie it up but we get some unrelated clips of the other players in the film: Robert Patrick (it’s great to see him working), Morris Chestnut, and even Jacinda Barrett. Jacinda who?

    Don’t know the name? The woman billed third, above Robert and Morris, was part of MTV’s Real World television series circa 1992. She was the rail thin model who lived in a posh flat in England with that balding race car kid, and the rawkin’ English guy who got his tongue bit off. That’s the one. It wouldn’t be so bad of an omen after seeing how dedicated she was to the craft a decade ago (she was a hardcore model, true, just like the acting powerhouse Ashton Kutcher so I could be wrong), but she’s given a hefty role here in what looks like a fairly pricy flick. I’m not sure what one has to do with the other but I’m curious to know how well she can pull it off.


    MARIA FULL OF GRACE (2004) Director:Joshua Marston
    Cast:Catalina Sandino Moreno, Guilied Lopez, Patricia Rae, Orlando Tobon, John Álex Toro, Yenny Paola Vega
    Release:July 16, 2004 (limited)
    Synopsis:HBO Films and Fine Line Features present the Sundance and Berlin Film Festival award winner, “Maria Full of Grace”. The film tells the story of one young woman’s journey from a small Colombian town to the streets of New York. A bright, spirited 17-year old, Maria Alvarez (Catalina Sandino Moreno) lives with three generations of her family in a cramped house in rural Colombia and works stripping thorns from flowers in a rose plantation. The offer of a lucrative job involving travel ““ in fact, becoming a drug “mule” ““ changes the course of her life. Far from the uneventful trip she is promised, Maria is transported into the risky and ruthless world of international drug trafficking. Her mission becomes one of determination and survival and she finally emerges with the grace that will carry her forward into a new life.
    View Trailer:
    * Large(Quick Time)
    Prognosis: Positive. Mules. Everyone loves a good mule. Whether it is at a third world petting zoo too cheap to get a dwarfed pony or it’s in the form of drug runners who carry their stash internally, there’s always some room for entertainment on either account. The trailer opens innocently enough. Maria, our protagonist, is shown riding a bus through some very scenic Columbian countryside. There is some great instrumental music and it evokes something genuine in the way this story is presented; I almost believed that Juan Valdez and his trusty donkey could walk across the screen at any moment. As her eyes seem to be glazed over from the lack of excitement in her life as she works in a factory where she prepares roses to get shipped all over the world, she doesn’t need to say a word. There is some despondency in her movements, her attitude. Cut to a quick dissolve and she’s being devoured by her boyfriend as he is either trying to give her a hickey or draw whatever blood is left in her body. When she tells the little man that she’s pregnant she is disinterested in his suggestion of marriage.

    Maria is shown sitting in her bedroom, alone, before getting herself together and going out onto the streets where she meets a man who offers her a job. It’s a job that involves “traveling,” where she could be work as a courier.

    This is where the movie stops becoming a Saturday Morning Special about girls who get pregnant too early in life and the ways in which their sexuality”¦not at all. This now is a flick about drugs.

    Cut to a thick wad of bills that is put on a table as Maria stares it. There are small white pellets, which contain either heroin or cocaine, look like big vitamins as Maria swallows them. Lest she believe that no harm can come to her, other than the stomach upset that she might face by ingesting globules of tightly packed narcotics, the local drug dealer lets her know that if any of the pellets, “get lost along the way, we’ll talk with your sister, mother, and grandmother.” Nice. The threat of violence is a great way to create a little tension and the trailer does it nicely insofar that even I felt a pang of concern for the very demure seventeen year old girl who now is caught in this world.

    As Maria makes her way to the States, via a jet plane, you can tell she’s getting nervous, nearly overwhelmed by either the fear for her safety or concern she has for her family. She disembarks off the plane and immediately we get a cop who asks her for her passport. Before you can say the word busted, the screen goes black.

    For my free trailer money, it doesn’t get better than this. I nearly slapped the side of my monitor in protest as I wanted to see what happens to this girl. The usual series of accolades the movie has received so far in the film festival circuit flash on the screen, but it is of no use to tell me. I already want to see the progression of events and to understand what exactly will happen to Maria by the end of this film. Oh yeah, there’s subtitles. If you’re planning on taking the resident illiterate in your life to the movies this should not be on your list.


    CELLULAR (2004) Director: David R. Ellis
    Cast: Kim Basinger, Chris Evans, Jason Statham, Jessica Biel, Noah Emmerich, William H. Macy, Valerie Cruz
    Release: September 17, 2004
    Synopsis: How do you save someone’s life if you can’t put down the phone? CELLULAR pits a young man in a high-stakes race against time as he searches for a kidnapped stranger whose only connection to him is through a wrong number on his cell phone.
    View Trailer:
    * Large (QuickTime)
    Prognosis: Negative. I really liked Kim Basinger. I believed in the power she had as an actor, and that of Bruce Willis and John Larroquette, long before I really got wise to the sham of it all, after I caught BLIND DATE on HBO in the late “˜80s. Apart from being incredibly convincing as a drunken lush there was an allure she had I really did appreciate as a young man. She was sexy, funny and then followed up that performance to a couple more that spoke to me on my level: MY STEPMOTHER IS AN ALIEN and then BATMAN.Something happened, though, between the time she made both those films then shooting out the turkeys THE MARRYING MAN and FINAL ANALYSIS when she made a really good attempt to do a legitimately great role in COOL WORLD and in 1997 in her role in L.A. CONFIDENTAL This all brings us to how this trailer plays with people who have a little history with the woman who changed the way some couples look at food in their fridge.

    Jason Statham kicks off the trailer by shoving Ms. Basinger into what looks like an attic, and then proceeds to knock the snot out of a wall phone which seems rather out of place for where they are but, hey, I didn’t pull the purse strings on this thing. He tells her that he needs to know something, she blubbers and says she doesn’t know anything, doesn’t know what he’s talking about, that he’s got the wrong family, but before we get a good shot of Jason twisting slightly to knock that MILF into last Tuesday with a backhand, we get boobs in a bikini.

    Off his high profile roles in NOT ANOTHER TEEN MOVIE and THE PERFECT SCORE, sporting the same hair and facial expressions, we get Chris Evans and his buddy using, whadda know, a cell phone as they are fully engulfed in their moment of sauciness, saying how great it is that phones like this were invented. Cut to Basinger who, unbeknownst to Statham, silly Englishman, seems to know her way around busted telephonic equipment. Through a series of crossed wires and a great knowledge of what’s needed to make a shattered phone work properly (that’s one plumbers crack I wouldn’t look away from should my Caller ID ever need home servicing) she gets a hold of our youthful male hero. Just in case you should not know how a person is able to get a hold of someone by telephone there is a handy graphic presentation that charts the path of an actual call. As he believes it might be a prank, Evans doesn’t believe it at first but gets hip real quick when Kim hides the receiver as Statham enters the room again, hopefully to deliver some justice after enduring a VHS copy of THE REAL MCCOY.

    Right about the time you think this is a flick you could walk away from William H. Macy pops on the screen like some cinematic flash of divine intervention. With a “˜stache that could make any male adult film star of the “˜70s be ashamed for their facial prowess Macy is a cop and he suspects, later finds out for sure, ta-da, someone’s been kidnapped. Before he can investigate the crime scene where Kim might have been taken from, a baddie involved with the plot tries to put a cap in the cop’s cranium but Macy is too important to the film’s plot line to be disposed of that easily and easily escapes harm.

    On the other side of town Chris now believes Basinger, after listening to a hysterical rant about some thugs going after her son, and heads to a smarmy looking prep school where Kim’s son looks like he’s getting into a car. Before Chris can yell out “heywouldyouwaitaminute” the kid is snatched like a Princess DI Beanie Baby and whisked away to parts unknown. Holmes starts a chase, funniness, by commandeering a Geo Metro or a Ford Festiva, some sort of P.O.S. car, and goes after those who took the kid. He is obviously new to the whole chasing people with a motorized vehicle and so he gives us a very convincing “whoa” as he weaves in and out of traffic. This whole scenario, if you can keep up with it, is topped with Chris seeing his phone flash LOW BATTERY. Isn’t that always the way? Here, seriously, brings us to a point in the trailer where Chris stops his crap car, after being asked by a now very clear thinking Basinger who asks if he happens to have a charger. After Chris finds a .38 special in the car, giving another Joey Lawrence patented “whoa,” he gets out, only to have the thing demolished in a blaze of fiery explosiveness by an unsuspecting Mac truck, runs into a store with said gun and burning wreckage of a car still roasting a few feet away, asks for help in the cell phone store, gets told to wait his turn by two different sales people, holds up his gun and then yells out “who’s gonna sell me that charger” while a now bawling Basinger sits on the other line.

    I couldn’t make this crap up even if I tried. I wasn’t sure, and am still not yet convinced, if this movie is supposed to be a comedy. I was blown away by the mere spectacle of it all; not what was on the screen, mind you, but the leaps in logic that were put in front of me like warmed crap on a platter. Most people would refuse to eat it up, but there are those who are hungry for anything

    It does look like the very able bodied Statham gets some good screen time as he goes after Chris with a pistol, but I am sure, just like the fight with Jet Li and Mel Gibson in LETHAL WEAPON 4 (Is there no one else who believes that Mel should have been turned into a wet mass of prune? It wasn’t even close to a fair fight.) Statham will be disposed of easily. The end has a very unimaginative “hello” being uttered with the phone-off-the-hook buzz echoing in the background. Is it too much to have Kim not make it in the end?


    ALEXANDER (2002) Director: Oliver Stone
    Cast: Colin Farrell, Angelina Jolie, Anthony Hopkins, Val Kilmer, Jared Leto, Rosario Dawson, Jonathan Rhys-Meyers
    Release: November 5, 2004
    Synopsis: Alexander is an epic story that is as daring, bold and ambitious as its subject, a relentless conqueror who by the age of 32 had amassed the greatest empire the world had ever seen. Past and present collide to form the puzzle of the protagonist (Colin Farrell), a tapestry of triumphs and tragedies in which childhood memories and Alexander’s rise to power unfold side by side with the later day expansion of his empire, its gradual decline and ultimate downfall.
    View Trailer:
    * Large (Quick Time)
    Prognosis: Positive. The voice over that tells me that “by the age of 25 he had conquered the known world” sounds almost like James Lipton in that sort of smarmy Alex Trebek I-Know-More-Than-You sort of way, but it’s not at all distracting to what is happening on the screen. You can feel, and tell, this is going to be a sweepingly wide movie. Many have seen early pictures of Colin Farrel’s blondish hair and have made comparisons to an early REVENGE OF THE NERDS Ted McGinley but it’s obvious in the trailer that the photos leave very little to be desired as Colin fits his role very well here. We are immediately aware this is a movie by Oliver Stone. His name hangs there alone on the screen like a Michael Jordan free-throw line dunk right before the magic appears.

    Warrior.

    The production values are visually present as is the violent nature of the material; kudos as well or the sustained shot of Colin from behind wielding a spear as he rides into combat. There seems to be more of an honesty with the battle sequence provided as nothing feels false or too glamorized.

    Lover.

    There is a nice look at some of the ladies but I’m really not interested to see Colin get it on if it’s just going to be one long tease with nothing so much as a nip slip. We get the idea he was a voracious womanizer but that has no currency with me if all I’m going to see is the bottom of their ankles as different colored robes slump to the floor.

    Seeker

    Visually, there is a good visual use of white snow and a red pullover that is keeping our hero warm as he surveys what could possibly be another part of the world be has yet to overtake. There is a lot that Alexander did when he was in charge so it will be interesting if this film shows the wide gamut of exotic locales he battled in.

    Conqueror.

    We’ve seen the cast of thousands shot in TROY as we have in the other LORD OF THE RINGS movies so it’s nice to see but it’s nothing that inspires any jovialness. This would have meant something in the fifties or sixties if I knew all of those figures were actual people but I’ve just grown jaded in my old age, I guess, as I think whether or not they’re CGI or figurines.

    Savior.

    There is a tremendously awesome shot at the end of a muddied, crazed looking Colin wielding a ferocious pig sticker as he goes up against a frigging elephant. There is no setup and no reason why he’s going at it but I’m really interested to know what the hell is going on.

    The only issue I have with this trailer is of the final shot. It is of a smiling Farrell looking straight into the camera and I swear I started to smile myself as images of Harlequin romance novel model Fabio danced in front of my eyes. Colin has a tough, critical road to hoe if he wants to make friends and influence people (not that he could care in the slightest) but he needs a movie like this to either prove he’s worthy of being in the company of great directors like Stone or if he would be better off slinging random objects at people in a Bullseye spin-off. The boy can act but he needs to establish some credibility. Hopefully this will be it.


    JU-ON: THE GRUDGE (2004) Director: Takashi Shimizu
    Cast: Megumi Okina, Misa Uehara, Misaki Ito, Yui Ichikawa, Kanji Tsuda
    Release: July 23, 2004 (limited)
    Synopsis: A volunteer home care worker, Nishina Rika (Megumi Okina), enters the home of a bed-ridden patient and discovers a strange ghostly presence lurking behind a door sealed with duct tape. Her discovery unleashes a horrible evil which baffles police investigators, who find that a whole series of people have gone missing from this particular house. Further investigation leads to Izutni Toyama (Misa Uehara), a former detective who handled the case of a man who murdered his wife in the house, but whose son was never found. But when the angry “Ju-On” spirit of vengeance that has infected the house reaches beyond its boundaries to kill Toyama and his daughter, Rika realizes that the horror is spreading. Worse, unless something is done about it, she feels she may become the angry spirit’s next victim!
    View Trailer:
    * Medium (Windows Media, QuickTime, Real Player)
    Prognosis: Positive. From the creators of international award winning, super fantastic, wunderbar, it ain’t crap film, RINGU”¦.This thing opens like a fistful of lead to the bread basket. It jolts but then calms just enough to get into a comfortable groove of flashing images to levels that just almost start inducing seizures. There is some manipulation of the visuals, the picture pixilating and turning to television static. Sound effects you really can’t place but know feel like impending doom bathe every moment of this trailer. I wish there was some way to turn the voice over off as it just gets in the way, like a tall fan at a ballgame that you wished would just sit the hell down and the let the rest of us enjoy what’s happening on the field. He prattles on “oooo”¦a danger lurks”¦,” “oooo”¦something’s pissed and you’re gonna be sorry”¦,” “ooo”¦there’s nothing more I can tell you to scare you away”¦” To tell you the honest truth this is probably the same mofo who tells me I need to turn into my local news at 10 because if I don’t my whole family might die without the lifesaving information they couldn’t possibly be bothered to tell you right now. The scary voice over just doesn’t play well here.

    If you can ignore him, and I know it will take every ounce of your being, there is some great imagery going on. Regardless of it’s a penultimate rip of THE RING, RINGU, or THE SIXTH SENSE the trailer is a beauty to watch. Apart from some great uses of whites, darks and colors, the vibe this thing puts out is the exact right thing in order to sell itself well to the intended audience.

    Starting from the opening, we get some nice and slow shots of our doomed characters. Since no one was wearing a HELLO MY NAME IS”¦ sticker on their best pockets I have no real way to determine who I know will die before the last reel spools to its conclusion. It’s a nice feeling, though. There is a certain discombobulating feeling, not knowing what is going on, as the trailer hits its stride, shots fading in, fading out at just the right speed. Just when you see someone almost bite it a ghastly apparition appears, in the form of powered sugar people (they seem to be glazed with a white, powdery substance not unlike a fresh batch of Entenmanns’s lightly dusted donuts), but, damn, if they aren’t still scary as all hell looking.

    I do get that there is one survivor of this all (there’s a shower scene for those interested in knowing) and there is some kid, a la every movie of the RING-like genre, stricken with the need to draw bad refrigerator art. There is a great image that flashes on the screen as one of these white people are behind a small piece of smoky glass. I find the vaguer the initial physical manifestation, presentation, of the scary thing and just letting it linger on the screen to let people get into it, the better. It’s about thrilling, not shocking. This film seems to grasp the latter. Although, and I won’t lie, I do appreciate the former as well so come one come all I say. The quick beat of the final presentation of clips to this thing at the end is a treat as there is enough great “gotta see” moments that it could easily be worth a ticket to see how they all play out.

    While I will not suppose myself to be an expert on all things Asian cinema, the nerds who are know who they are, I do know that it behooves the average citizen of this country to check out some of the online stores and auction sites to get into a continent that has been doing scary better even before Gore Verbinski got his talons into the RING franchise. It’s not a bad thing to be a copycat, but be safe in the knowledge that Asians are the ones who have triggered some of the best stuff you already own in your movie library.



    May 28, 2004

    Trailer Park: Cures For The Summertime Blues

    Filed under: Columns,Trailer Park — admin @ 2:25 am

    E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES

    By Christopher Stipp

    May 28, 2004

    CURES FOR THE SUMMERTIME BLUES

    This week, like a crazed mutant toddler hopped up on kiddie Quaaludes, consisting of a 64 oz. big gulp of Hi-C Fruit Punch and a couple packets of Pop Rocks, washed down with a box of Nerds, I’m taking the room down a notch to bring you all some out of the way fare. I have some new stuff from Spike Lee, a movie in the vein of the Coen’s (when they were good), a new flick from Doc Ock, an indie about Mexicans that’s actually supposed to be funny, and a gritty crime flick starring The Punisher.

    That brings me to a good point. While not having seen THE PUNISHER (many telling me to simply wait for video) I still am wondering why there hasn’t been more of Tom Jane. Or is it Thomas Jane. T.J.? Whatever the hell he’s called (Lawrence Fishburne will always be Cowboy Curtis to me no matter how coyly he tries to escape his past) Thomas Jane looks exceptionally good in STANDER. I chose this as the trailer of the week simply because of how well he throws his charisma around on the screen. I am still enamored of that one scene in BOOGIE NIGHTS when I knew everything was going to roll down the hill in a very bad way for all concerned as he and Marky Mark sat on that couch near the end of the picture. Hopefully this older flick from 2002 will remind everyone that there are other players in this Hollywood game who deserve a couple more inches of love to prove what they can do.

    With that little soapboxery out of the way I have to publicly say thank you to all the indie movie guys who have been submitting their trailers to me to pimp their projects. I have seen some great things come through here and just in case you’re sitting on one let me say this: send it in. I am usually just twisting in the wind here on Fridays as I wonder which direction I’ll go for the following week. Just between you and me I’m a lazy bastard at heart. I would like nothing more than to not have to scour for five good (or bad) trailers for the week when I know there’s one waiting for me. I know that some of you are done with film school for the summer and might have made something worth watching. Let me off light for the week, people.

    Hopefully this week’s doesn’t bore any of you, but we all can agree that we all could use a little more variety in our lives before we all descend into the frenetic pace of the summer movie season. Don’t believe the hype that summer is a wasteland for those who want their babes buxom and their explosions frequent. There are good antidotes to the mainstream that will be trickling in this summer and these are some morsels you all can look forward to in between viewings of SPIDER-MAN and ALIEN VS. PREDATOR.

    A DAY WITHOUT A MEXICAN (2004)

    Director: Sergio Arau
    Cast: Caroline Aaron, Melinda Allen, Frankie J. Allison, Yareli Arizmendi, Todd Babcock, Maria Beck, Brian Brophy
    Release: May 14th, 2004 (California)
    Synopsis: One day California wakes up and not a single Latino is left in the state. They have all inexplicably disappeared. Chaos, tragedy, and comedy quickly ensue.

    View Trailer:
    * Various (Flash)

    Prognosis: Positive. Damn, that was funny.

    The very idea of a social satire, especially one put onto film, is something that hasn’t stirred me since seeing THE WIZARD OF OZ; having to be told what things represented and meant in the metaphorical sense revealed a whole new layer of the film to me many years ago. What I like, them, about this trailer is its absolute obnoxiousness and the way it is operating on more than one level. When I think of how subtle or coy one could be with something like this, something that shines a light on an obvious problem in America today, a movie like this looks like it could easily shoot down the pink elephant that is blocking my view of the 52″ plasma on the wall in the living room. The things that aren’t said outright are only hinted at in this trailer.

    With views of L.A. sweeping across the screen, a serious announcer says that California has another crisis on its hands. I initially begin to think this is going to a documentary about immigration that looks at things in an objective, serious manner as the announcer is leading one to believe that this is going to be a true deconstruction of the issue. I wonder what could possibly be at the center of a debate that causes one talking head to declare that, “this is a real serious disaster.” It’s a state of emergency. The state of California has lost all their Mexicans.

    The image of a hooptie bouncing down the street by itself, a leaf blower twirling around in a circle with no one around, and an abandoned wife who is visibly distraught that her Mexican husband has left without a trace is well done. The concerned wife goes on to say, after an image of floating dentures in a glass is shown, that he, “would never leave without his teeth.” I like it. It’s whip smart comedy. We then are treated to small snippets of film about how life would be like at the car wash, a restaurant, the valet stand, et al without the presence of our Latino brothers. Everywhere a Mexican would usually be invisible is shown as a center of the city’s chaos. They then cut away to a man who declares, very seriously, that if Mexicans weren’t really aliens to begin with then why does a Mexican sombrero look awfully close to a floating UFO?

    The trailer ends with the Border Patrol on screen asking for the Mexicans to come back. A couple do arrive on scene and are then surrounded by a cadre of officers who, instead of arresting them, hoist them on their shoulders and celebrate. If there was any contention at all with this trailer it would have to be that it has a very “indie” feel to it. Those used to the high powered companies crafting the trailer for SPIDER-MAN 2 need not expect much in terms of production values.

    What is nice about this trailer, apart from the premise, is that this film has none other than John Getz in it. If the name doesn’t strike you swiftly in the cerebral cortex fast enough, he is not only the man responsible for Carl and James’ near demise in MEN AT WORK but he is also the bearded hero who attacks a transformed Brundlefly in, well, THE FLY; p.s., if any dude puts their schmingy in a jar for safe keeping a shotgun blast to the temple, I believe, is an acceptable mode of behavior modification. Also, the material of this picture has a very interesting premise, an absurdist take on a hot button issue, but it’s something that people will either really enjoy for its view or feel encroached on for the posits it might make about how some Americans view the issue. The fact that someone explored this part of the American social and economic landscape, and in this manner, is something that should be considered nothing less than bold in today’s political climate.

    UNDERTAKING BETTY (2002)

    Director: Nick Hurran
    Cast: Brenda Blethyn, Alfred Molina, Naomi Watts, Christopher Walken, Lee Evans, Robert Pugh
    Release: July 2nd, 2004 (New York)
    Synopsis: UNDERTAKING BETTY is an outrageous comedy set in a small Welsh town about a funeral parlor owner (ALFRED MOLINA) whose life is about to turn upside down. The woman he’s loved since she was a young girl (Academy Award nominee BRENDA BLETHYN) is about to become available… by staging her own untimely demise! And the business he’s always loved is about to come under attack, from a flashy American competitor (Academy Award winner CHRISTOPHER WALKEN), who wants to “put the fun back in funerals” with theme burials, Vegas-style ceremonies and a whole lot of neon lighting. Neither our leading man nor this small town will ever be the same again. UNDERTAKING BETTY also stars Academy Award nominee NAOMI WATTS as the hilariously scheming mistress whose diabolical ways add even more fuel to the comedic fire.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (Quick Time)

    Prognosis: Positive. There are a few reasons why this movie looks good enough to recommend to the older sect, as well as those looking for an “offbeat” rom com, but no other excuse could be better than for the reason that has Christopher Walken playing another one of his crazy-enough-to-be-funny caricatures.

    There is, however, the inclusion of Alfred Molina, Naomi Watts, and even the guy from that movie, whatzit called, the pizza guy from THERE’S SOMETHING ABOUT MARY, Lee Evans.

    To start, the voice-over isn’t as nearly as intrusive as it could be as it tells us about the town in which all the events are about to unfold. This is a good example of how the unseen face of the announcer can be used to good effect and can explain enough of the plot well without having to give away every pivotal scene, visually, of the film.

    I was unsure if this was a trailer worthy enough of this readership but when I saw this movie had Doc Ock himself representing an undertaker that is synonymous with dignity and then showing Walken, with a coif worthy to champion his “˜do from A VIEW TO A KILL, as the man who is the used car salesman of the funeral business I was sold. Walken, in a crème colored turtleneck sweater and light jacket, fires on all cylinders as he’s initially shown showing a grieving man his dead wife’s corpse, letting the bereaving husband know he has fully realized his wife’s passion for Star Trek at this, her hour of passing. The dead wife is clothed in a Trek uniform, has Spock ears attached to her head, and her casket is lined with a shimmery silver lining worthy of any space traveler off to their final destination. As Spicoli would have said: Awesome.

    The twist in this story is not the rivalry between competing funeral homes, although there is more than enough amusement to be had in that vein, but it is the oddly complicated, but amusing, love story between a wife who is burnt out on a loveless marriage with a husband who is cheating on her with Naomi Watts and a dignified undertaker who has probably always have loved her in that clichéd movie kind of way. In order for the jilted wife to flee her marriage to her husband, however, and considering that divorce is not an option, the undertaker proposes making it seem like she’s gone to the great beyond in order for the two of them to be together. As a sidebar, if you are going to have a man step out on his wife in a flick, for believability’s sake, make sure she’s Naomi Watts. I may be speaking from the minority but, on the whole, (and if you just envision the scene from THE RING when she’s down in that well with her hair all slicked back and wearing that clingy, wet sweater), you would be hard pressed to find any married man who is powerless against Watts’ tempting temptress treats. Just an observation.

    The best part of this trailer, apart from the setup, is how would a movie about a woman, who is trying to leave her husband and has to fake her death to do it, is so damned funny. It is. I have no problem with saying that the ensuing scenes of Molina trying to convince the town that Brenda Blethyn is indeed dead are enough for me to want to see this film. With Blonde’s “One Way or Another” in the background and Christopher Walken asking Molina, upon seeing the “dead” Blethyn, if he used a collagen spray or even a clear varnish to make her look so alive it sells this movie very well to me.

    While this film looks like it will just skim a wide release and most likely hit the art house it would behoove the average moviegoer to either pimp this to one’s own parents (a demographic in serious need for good film and not the average crap that BRUCE ALMIGHTY gets praise for) or use this as a date flick when one’s options are limited to either the new Lindsay Lohan flick about girls who love the fact they’re girls or a Julia Roberts vehicle where she is changing the world one woman at a time. Pick your poison but this one looks like you get a little romance, a little Watts, some comedy, and a whole lot of Walken. Those in the know realize that the two things in life you can never have too much of are Walken and cowbell. The two are simply synonymous.

    SHE HATE ME (2004)

    Director: Spike Lee
    Cast: Anthony Mackie, Kerry Washington, Dania Ramirez, Ling Bai, Ellen Barkin, Monica Bellucci, Jim Brown, Ossie Davis, Brian Dennehy, Woody Harrelson, Q-Tip, John Turturro
    Release: July 23, 2004 (Limited)
    Synopsis: Wharton-educated biotech executive John Henry “Jack” Armstrong (Anthony Mackie) gets fired when he informs on his bosses, launching an investigation into their business dealings by the Securities & Exchange Commission. Branded a whistle-blower and therefore unemployable, Jack desperately needs to make a living. When his former girlfriend Fatima (Kerry Washington), a high powered businesswoman and now a lesbian, offers him cash to impregnate her and her new girlfriend Alex (Dania Ramirez), Jack is persuaded by the chance to make ³easy² money. Word spreads and soon Jack is in the baby-making business at $10,000 a try. Lesbians with a desire for motherhood and the cash to spare are lining up to seek his services. But, between the attempts by his former employers to frame him for security fraud and his dubious fathering activities, Jack finds his life, all at once, becoming very complicated.

    View Trailer:
    * LARGE (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Positive.

    Spike Lee.

    Immediately, the name conjures up images of Rosie Perez doing her “expressive” dance from DO THE RIGHT THING, one that even I would fear to try and match on the dance floor and even the sounds of “Fight the Power” by Public Enemy fill the memory as well. It’s been 15 years since DO THE RIGHT THING landed and it still remains a staple in moviedom as the go-to film of 1989. It encapsulated a lot of things about our culture at the time, some of it still relevant and prevalent, but it also showed how well Spike could direct. While I believe it was a great film, his career has had more elevating moments than there are bombs. Sure, movies like the 25TH HOUR don’t get the kind of love from audiences it should, but those in the know see the power in every inch of celluloid for that picture.

    What is remarkable, then, is the amusing premise of SHE HATE ME. At first glance it seems this is a film based on the office life of a common worker bee. Woody Harrelson looks to be the boss we all wish we never have, Ellen Barken as another boss of the same company who looks like she eats men’s egos for breakfast, but things rapidly change. It appears to be that our protagonist, Jimmy, has his bank accounts frozen and his life turned upside down on the charge he was dabbling in insider trading. As our man Jim is convalescing on the floor of his apartment, down on his luck, a couple of his lesbian friends drop by to say hey, have a chat and then proposition him to help them have a kid. If this wasn’t odd enough, and our leading man does protest too much, the plot is sweetened by the idea that many other women, namely, lesbians, would like to buy Jimmy’s power of fertility for $10,000 a pop. Or orgasm, however the case may be. This whole scenario is confessed to his friend who is about to drop the S-bomb when “it” happens.

    Now, I like Spike Lee. I would say love, but we’re just getting to know each other in this trailer. I like Spike but dammit all to hell if, once again, we get the needle scraping across the vinyl record sound effect again. Please. For the love of all that isn’t tired and busted, even though someone is about to say or do something that needs punctuation with a sound effect isn’t there something else (the Wilhelm Scream comes quickly to mind) that can be used? Do what he will, but there are those of us who recognize the record scratch is a lazy way to bleep out a cuss word.

    /End of rant

    Things do get made up to me, however, in the very sultry siren form of Monica Bellucci; she is the reason why more women should eat a friggin’ sandwich or two. The mere idea that she plays a lesbian should make most fanboys of the Italian starlet line up in deck chairs at their local theaters. Woody Harrelson (where the hell have you been, man?) looks great as the evil brother of Bill Lumbergh and even John Turturro gets a chance to look great if only for a moment. The supporting cast is stacked and it’s nice to see everyone, from what I can see, playing their parts well.

    In addition to the idea that Jimmy is a human sperm bank to the lesbian ladies of the world there also brews the accusations into insider trading that started him out on his path to poverty. There is a great story inside this picture and I hope it lives up to everything this trailer makes it out to be. Hopefully, in much the same way that DO THE RIGHT THING did 15 years ago, Spike interjects some of the same sharp social consciousness that usually elevates his pictures above the usual fare and exposes some things that others would just as soon gloss over.

    THE BURIAL SOCIETY (2002)

    Director: Nicholas Racz
    Cast: Rob LaBelle, Jan Rubes Allan Rich, Bill Meilen, David Paymer, Seymour Cassel, Linden Banks, Jeff Seymour, Bill Mondy, Nathaniel DeVeaux
    Release: May 28th, 2004
    Synopsis: Sheldon Kasner, a man of quiet desperation who works as a loan manager at the Hebrew National Bank is overworked and under-appreciated. He struggles to surpass the limitations of his mundane life. Sheldon, the most unlikely of criminals, is drawn into the underworld of money laundering in a desperate attempt to overcome his mediocre existence. Unfortunately for Sheldon, events don’t unfold as he expects and the missing two million dollars has him begging for his life as he’s dangled from a bridge in the opening sequence of THE BURIAL SOCIETY. Forced to reconsider his strategy, Sheldon concocts an elaborate plan involving the Chevrah Kadisha or Burial Society ““ devout Jewish men who prepare dead bodies for burial. THE BURIAL SOCIETY is a gripping, plot-twisting tale of murder and intrigue ““ a non-stop suspense thriller that will have audiences doubting themselves at every turn.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (Quick Time)

    Prognosis: Nice. Real Nice.

    What the hell happened with the brothers Cohen?

    They went from BLOOD SIMPLE, to RAISING ARIZONA, to MILLERS CROSSING, to FARGO, and even THE MAN WHO WASN’T THERE before the wheels started to come off one by one. INTOLERABLE CRUELTY (there’s one”¦), THE LADYKILLERS (there’s the other) are good examples of a slide but, obviously, maybe it’s just a creative slump. Those in need of a satisfying caper, in the vein of a David Mamet production, could find it in THE BURIAL SOCIETY.

    “One day, if you’re lucky enough, you’ll be confronted by the truth. You’ll see your life in front of you and you’ll realize how much you hate it.”

    As the trailer begins, a guy, obviously in the throes of something deeper than his conscious self will let him ignore, is trying to come to grips that the people he works for are filtering money through the company he works for in a much illegal way.

    “People give us money and we give it back.”

    “You launder money.”

    “No, we launder money.”

    Not since the money talk from Danny Devito in HEIST have I been sucked in by the premise of back dealings that could end up in double crosses. Before I get too entrenched in the narrative, however, I am taken out of things by a black screen telling me this movie has been an official selection at over 50 film festivals. Once I’m back into things our protagonist, looking like he was ripped from the role of Jason Bateman’s brother, Buster, from ARRESTED DEVELOPMENT, starts to grow a heart and wants to get away from the seedy underpinnings of his current line of work. Black screen. Winner of”¦.ok ok I got it, already. You’re film is all knowing and wonderful now get back to it.

    Our man, Sheldon, decides to become involved with a group that prepares dead bodies for their final voyage into the next world. Based on the Jewish Chevrah Kadisha, or burial society, it is, “comprised of volunteers who aid the bereaved and ensure that appropriate practices are followed. When a member of a community dies, it is the community’s responsibility to lovingly assist the deceased’s family in this final act of respect.” Taken at face value, then, the man who is now ensnared in profiteering of the highest, and illicit, order tries to find solace in a group that helps the dead. Apart from the intriguing juxtaposition of stories it is nice to see a film have to get by, or fail, on the merits of its writing. The cinematography catches your eye as well and the acting seems to be there, but it is the last half of this trailer that really ropes you in.

    TV screens fill the frame as Sheldon is suspected in a double murder and the theft of two million dollars. The quick scenes start interspersing. He gets told he has 48 hours to get the money (From who? From where? What money? And why do these guys always get 48 hours to produce something?); a foot chase ensues; random quotes about how super duper this film is are shown from odd papers (The Eye Weekly?); bearer bonds flash briefly on the screen for a moment; a gun appears out of nowhere; some scroll says, “Sometimes The Truth Won’t Stay Buried”; someone’s upside down over a bridge; and then a coffin where I believe our man is going to be shipped out of harm’s way takes our hero aback as he realizes it is his only path to freedom.

    This is the kind of film that has been absent from the screen for a little while as those with a need for pulp crime capers got their fill from SPARTAN, but it’s nice to see filmmakers looking to make a name for themselves do it with this kind of genre. A plot like this, to keep things interesting, needs to be smart, witty and sharp. Without knowing for sure if this film has what it takes it is hard to tell whether this is a great success or a great selection that should run nicely someday on UPN affiliate stations at midnight right before the infomercial for Carlton Sheets real estate program and right after Don Lapre tells me how I can make thousands from my home using tiny, classified ads.

    STANDER (2003)

    Director: Bronwen Hughes
    Cast: Thomas Jane, Ashley Taylor, David O’Hara, Dexter Fletcher, Deborah Unger, Marius Weyers
    Release: January 16th, 2004 (Sundance Film Festival)
    Synopsis: “Stander” is based on the true story of André Stander (Jane), a South African homicide/robbery police captain who became one of the most notorious bank robbers in the country. After participating in the brutal killing in a riot in the line of duty, Stander decided to defy the very system he was part of, and set off on an audacious crime spree; robbing banks during his lunch hour then returning to the scene of the crime to lead the investigation. Finally, caught by the same police force he worked with, he was jailed and, subsequently befriended Allan Heyl and Lee McCall. After a daring jailbreak, the ‘Stander Gang’ committed a large number of robberies, which grew increasingly bold over time. In the eyes of the public, their blatant disregard for authority made them South Africa’s most popular anti-heroes. In reality, however, Stander and his gang were the most wanted men in the country.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (Windows Media, Real Player)

    Prognosis: Positive.

    Tom Jane looks better than Willis in THE JACKAL and much more believable as a shape shifting badass than Kilmer in THE SAINT.

    What is remarkable, then, about the above statement is that Jane is able to exude all this all without saying one, single, word in this trailer. Even though the music is easily forgettable, a seventies era riff that keeps recycling itself, almost feeling like it could descend into a porno-esque wakka-wakka-wow, the scroll is nicely used here, and the use of the multiple shots within a shot, utilized nicely in STARSKY AND HUTCH and even BEFORE SUNSET, is a great effect with what’s happening on the screen. And what’s happening on the screen is all Jane.

    The shots open up with a mustachioed Jane (coming real close, again, to invoking the porn vibe with that thing) sticking up a bank. What you don’t really notice, but comes across real well, is the way Jane isn’t slick and dolled up for this robberies. In movies like POINT BREAK and even HEAT (my apologies for putting them so close together in the same sentence) the baddies are in masks or are looking real good in their suits while robbing a joint. Jane is frumpy, a little sleazy, but it works.

    Unrecognizable.

    The next thing you notice about this trailer is the way it feels. To say it has a gritty feel, like washing your hands with sand, would be a disservice to the cinematographer and director who have some great ways of showcasing Jane’s prowess as a charismatic actor.

    Uncatchable.

    When all this is going on and you think that this is all about the OG thug life of a straight shootin’ thief we get a helicopter view of some desert landscape with police, people and pistols all in chaos, almost like we’re being tossed inside BLACK HAWK DOWN, and you barely have a moment to process what in the hell is going on before we get more Jane action. And by Jane action, I do mean that it looks like there might be the possibility of the porn coming to life, however soft-core it may be as he gets it on with a faceless hootchie.

    Unknowable. Unbelievable.

    Lest you believe that’s all we’re gonna get, shots of firearms, car chases, more of Jane’s mug, and the implication that this is all based on a true story gets pushed as quick as it can be before this thing ends. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve seen films based on true stories but that qualifier alone, and you know who you are, makes the buy-in for some people that much easier. Not that reality based films are all good mind you, as evidenced by the kiddie groin kick that was PATCH ADAMS, but this looks light on the schmaltzy crap and heavy on putting people into the ground rather than preventing them from going in it.

    As a side note, Bronwen Hughes, the woman behind the lens, was also responsible for bringing FORCES OF NATURE, among other things, into our cinematic lives. Now, while I know the din could reach high levels, I cannot tell you how much I still like that film. In a movie where Ben Affleck and Sandra Bullock play opposite each other in a tête-à-tête of repressed passion I thought it one of the best rom coms ever put to the screen. I know that doesn’t say much but I am not easily wooed by the BIG FAT FRIENDS WEDDING IN NOTTING HILL WHO HAPPENS TO BE A WEDDING PLANNER IN SWEET ALABAMA makers of the world. So color me impressed.

    May 21, 2004

    Trailer Park: Advantage, Pixar

    Filed under: Columns,Trailer Park — admin @ 2:28 am

    E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES

    By Christopher Stipp

    May 21, 2004

    ADVANTAGE, PIXAR

    I don’t know what kind of sticky cheeba was being smoked in or around the Disney negotiating table when it was time to talk business with the Pixar people but I’m feeling that somehow, someone might have actually thought, “Oh yeah. We can do this alone.”

    Without being privy to the actual negotiations I cannot say for sure what the reason was for Disney to not only give up the brand but of the zombie-like following of people who will queue up now for every picture Pixar produces simply based on the kind of hitting percentage it has in the marketplace. It sucks for them as Pixar looks like it has another winner on its hands with THE INCREDIBLES. There is something for the kids, some humor for the adults, and, as always, some great looking animation to make everything easier to swallow. Truth be told, if I had a choice between a traditionally animated feature by Disney (let’s say Brother Bear) or any other animated film by Pixar I would always always always put my money down for the Pixar bunch first and then, should I find the time again to take my ankle biter to the talkies I might give Disney a second look. That is, unless, the kids cry out begging to see the Pixar film again and that’s the killer that will crush the competition. Kids love seeing crap over and over. The monstrous grosses for a film like NEMO can only happen when kids and parents see it a second, third time and when your film is slighted in lieu of another for the first go around that could mean the difference between profit and loss. The fact that SHARK TALE is releasing a month early, in the hopes of getting in before the pond goes dry is a very wise move on Dreamworks’ part.

    CONSTANTINE (2004)

    Director: Francis Lawrence
    Cast: Keanu Reeves, Rachel Weisz, Shia LaBeouf, Djimon Hounsou
    Release: February 11th, 2005
    Synopsis: Based on the DC/Vertigo comic book Hellblazer and written by Kevin Brodbin, Mark Bomback and Frank Capello, Constantine tells the story of irreverent supernatural detective John Constantine (Keanu Reeves), who has literally been to hell and back. When Constantine teams up with skeptical policewoman Angela Dodson (Rachel Weisz) to solve the mysterious suicide of her twin sister (also played by Weisz), their investigation takes them through the world of demons and angels that exists just beneath the landscape of contemporary Los Angeles. Caught in a catastrophic series of otherworldy events, the two become inextricably involved and seek to find their own peace at whatever cost.

    View Trailer:
    * Various (Windows Media, QuickTime, Real Player)

    Prognosis: Positive.

    If there was any doubt about how slick CONSTANTINE was going to look this, hopefully, is a good start about establishing the kind of visuals that can be expected throughout the film.

    I’ll admit it; I have never picked up a HELLBLAZER comic. I barely know that it’s a part of DC’s Vertigo line. While I was busy feasting on heroes, throwing in a LONE WOLF AND CUB, getting involved in indie trysts with LIBERTY MEADOWS and SCUD, here was a book based on some fairly crazy crap I know I would have been interested in had I felt like venturing out a little further out of my cubby hole. So, without really knowing anything about this film or comic book I am glad I am able to see everything with a fresh perspective. This perspective carries over into the opening moments of the trailer that has some chick grabbing the ceiling and looking back at the camera in a way that I can only assume is either demonic, or erotic, in nature.

    Things get better as Rachel Weisz has some face time, looking pastier than ever, God love her, and we get a nice extended look at some freaky deeky artifacts of “the occult” that Constantine is supposed to be involved with. Just as you’re getting your bearings as to what the hell is going on in this picture, out comes a Zippo as it ignites a crucifix in a slo-mo dispay of bad-assedness. I still have no real clue what’s happening to this point, not knowing if that whole cross burning thing was motivated by some kind of evil or some fundamentalist Christian BBQ but I am really enjoying the ride. The trailer whips around the corners without lifting any tires up as we get little peeks of some demons (if you push pause on the Quick Time player while it plays, and slowly drag your cursor across the screen there are some great things to pick out and deconstruct as it would otherwise go unnoticed), a very Neo looking Reeves, and a wet Rachel Weisz, which, if I’m really being honest, would get a pass from me any day of the year even if the trailer turned out to be pure crap. However, this trailer stands as one of the best teasers for a movie not even playing this year.

    Even though the release date for this movie is February 11th of next year (I know, WTF?) this film has some very nice looking direction, cinematography and even the locations for some of the scenes look quite dramatic. The trailer has some very good, very mood specific music, uses an array of clips but slowly metes them out in nice, controlled bursts, and it has a wet Rachel Weisz. The last point notwithstanding there is an interesting moment in the trailer with Weisz as she is standing in an office. Seemingly, out of nowhere, she is yanked backwards though some a wall, actually a whole of lot wall, and there is a sustained shot of Keanu standing on the lip of a busted out window dozens of floors above the street as we see that they were all in a high rise. The building looks torn right out of the MATRIX RELOADED but hopefully I’ll be able to understand what’s going on in this one with a little better ease.

    SOME KIND OF MONSTER (2004)

    Director: Joe Berlinger, Bruce Sinofsky
    Cast: James Hetfield, Lars Ulrich, Kirk Hammett, Robert Trujillo, Jason Newsted, Dave Mustaine, Cliff Burton, Bob Rock, Phil Towne
    Release: July 9, 2004 Limited
    Synopsis: Three years in the making, this new film from acclaimed documentary filmmakers Joe Berlinger and Bruce Sinofsky (BROTHER’S KEEPER and PARADISE LOST) provides a fascinating, in-depth portrait of the most successful heavy metal band of all time, as they faced monumental personal and professional challenges while recording their first studio album of original songs in five years. In the tradition of such seminal music documentaries as DON’T LOOK BACK and GIMME SHELTER, METALLICA: SOME KIND OF MONSTER seeks to transcend the conventions of the “rock ‘n ‘ roll movie” genre, trading rock-star posing for truthful introspection and revealing an intimate portrait of the individuals behind a legendary band and their unique creative journey.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (Quick Time)

    Prognosis: Positive.

    I’ve been avoiding this one.

    I have not, nor ever will, own a METALLICA album. I know while I was in high school in the early nineties the boys in METALLICA had a delightful time touring on the power of their eponymous release which contained, and spawned many air guitards who thought they could follow along, the super single “Enter Sandman.” I didn’t much like them and still don’t care for them all that much. However, Lars, James, Kirk found a niche, exploited the crap out it, and are now the new KISS without the makeup or action figures. Whups. Sorry “˜bout that. They do have action figures.

    This trailer, at its core, has good music. Obviously it’s ballasted by METALLICA noise but it’s a great fit. Also, the trailer, if examined sonically, builds up just like a WINGER power ballad as the action unfolds on the screen. We get some slo-mo walking (a staple in most concert footage. Usually, you get it when they’re taking a bow towards the crowd or hurling their sweat towels to undulating fans.), some flash bulbs are popping, and a really, really simple looking scroll that starts to have a dialogue with me as a viewer.

    “This is not a concert film,” it reads. We then get some more unrelated shots of swirling fans being unintentionally ironic with their hands in the air, making the devil hand sign. “This is not “Behind the Music,” it says. There are more kids and their screaming enthusiasm. “This is something else.” Ok. If you say so, I guess. I sit back in my chair and wait for the trailer to tell me, then, what the hell this is supposed to be. Of course it’s a documentary but there is no need to be so dramatic about the nature of this film. Where’s Ronnie James Dio when you need him?

    From there, the music picks up, there is a shot of a web browser loading Napster (is that Netscape I see? I can see why Lars is such an angry man.), a snippet of some jamoke avoiding security who are looking to toss him like a rainbow by doing a stage dive (always a fun occurrence at a rock show), and then we get James’ voice over with the scroll following right behind his words just so you can understand what he’s saying.

    “Metallica is”¦you might look at it as a friend”¦to me it’s been a beast.”

    A beast that’s made him millions. I know I’ve said I hate it, but this phrase put the sound of a record being scratched off the turntable in my mind when I heard this. When people talk about how rough their lives are, in spite of the enormous gifts that have been bestowed upon them like treasures of a plundered civilization, and want to create the illusion of despondency, real or not, it makes me wonder what it is they’re really complaining about. It’s not nice to take someone out of the viewing experience and it was just not a smart editorial move. Regardless of Hetfield’s comments, amusing as they are, we get some personal looks at Ulrich and Hetfield with their kids. Neat. The trailer starts to show some heart and soul here. We then get some cat fighting between Lars and James, which is good for a few giggles, and the tension gets ratcheted a notch or two and increases my buy-in into this movie.

    Critics, and their journalistic sound bites, are put onto the screen obviously to provide some legitimacy to this project, to make it clear to fans that they can only see this thing in the theaters and not yet available at the METALLICA e-shop. You can, though, go to Metallica.com where you can pick up a set of band bobbleheads for $75 to tide you over.

    The trailer has some moments of groan inducing, roll your eyes backward, awkwardness as the hackneyed us vs. them subplot unfolds but speaking from the point as someone who saw Wilco’s I AM TRYING TO BREAK YOUR HEART, easily one of the best documentaries about the making of an album ever put down on DVD and should be mandatory viewing for anyone wanting some more exposure to the genre. This movie, however, generated some legitimate interest in me as METALLICA are at the top of the metal game and it would be interesting enough to see what conflict, if any, these guys go through while trying to make an album together. They obviously don’t break up but I’ll settle for the chance to see if the band has any amusing DEF LEPPARD anecdotes.

    SHARK TALE (2004)

    Director: Eric Bergeron, Vicky Jenson
    Cast: Will Smith, Robert De Niro, Renée Zellweger, Angelina Jolie, Jack Black, Martin Scorsese, Peter Falk, Michael Imperioli, Vincent Pastore, Doug E. Doug, Ziggy Marley
    Release: October 1, 2004
    Synopsis: Oscar (Will Smith) is a fast-talking little fish who dreams big. But his big dreams land him in hot water when a great white lie turns him into an unlikely hero. At first, his fellow fish swallow Oscar’s story hook, line and sinker and he is showered with fame and fortune. It’s all going along swimmingly, until it starts to become clear that Oscar’s tale about being the defender of the Reef is all wet. Oscar is finding out that being a hero comes at a Market Price when his lie threatens to make him the Catch of the Day. Now he has to tread water until he can get the scales to tip back in his favor again.

    View Trailer:
    * VARIOUS (Windows Media, QuickTime, Real Media)

    Prognosis: Negative.

    The release of this movie’s trailer in the same week that THE INCREDIBLES hit hardly seems like an accident. This trailer has some major differences with THE INCREDIBLES, one of them being, actually, that THE INCREDIBLES trailer didn’t blow.

    We get an opening shot of a restaurant. Sharks are dining at a well-to-do establishment (okay, so we’re gonna go down the sea life-who-live-just-like-humans-do-but-with-a-twist road) where Jack Black plays the son of a rather large shark, voiced by Robert De Niro. Young Lenny refuses to eat some seafood on the grounds that he’s, “a vegetarian.” Gasps ensue, as does hilarity, because he’s a shark, man! Sharks aren’t vegetarians! They’re carnivores! That goes against nature! Hilarious. Really, it is.

    From the restaurant we get a horse race. Not just any horse race, mind you, but a seahorse race. A seahorse race. But that’s not the best part, you see, because just leaving it there would be another sea life-living-as-humans-but-with-a-twist convention. No, a fish, voiced by Will Smith, bets on a seahorse and it doesn’t win. It trips near the finish line. Smith shouts out to anyone who will listen to his insistent yammering, “Who trips under water?” Exactly what I’m thinking, Will. How does anyone trip under water? It’s craziness I tell you! It goes against nature.

    Well, after a little more exposition, a moment I will save you from, we get the idea that that Will’s character is mistakenly seen as an almightily shark slayer after an unfortunate mishap with a boat’s anchor elevates his character’s standing in the aquatic community. Somehow, after a series of events where Smith hams his voice up for all it’s worth, touting his newly found street cred, he comes to the realization that he needs to slay another shark to remain in such high regard and that Jack Black’s shark character needs to disappear. It’s a little confusing, but I’m thinking there is some kind of running away from home/father/son issues going on in this film that will eventually end with a teary reunion for all. But, back in the trailer, and from out of nowhere, one of the best old school jams starts up, Car Wash, as there seems to be fish washing other fish in what I can only suspect is an exciting opportunity to see another example of sea life-living-as-humans-but-with-a-twist. I mean they’re in the water already, but yet they wash each other. It’s a terribly puzzling riddle but luckily I don’t care as we come to the one redeeming moment in the trailer. I have much love to give to an amusing dialogue exchange between De Niro and Martin Scorcese, who makes his first appearance in CGI, with multiple volleys back and forth using the word “what.” Very amusing.

    This is bright looking trailer and picture. The colors don’t look anywhere near the natural palate in FINDING NEMO, and, to take it one step further, this film seems visually closer to taking an episode of the Snorks, snatching the clothes off a mid-seventies Doug Henning, pouring a gallon of childhood-grade tempera over everything and putting it all on a paint shaker for a week and turning it into small, animated pieces. I know that Dreamworks will probably rake it in for this film, on top of the colossal amounts it will make for SHREK 2, but I was categorically unimpressed with anything, with the exception of Bobby De Niro and Marty Scorsese, I saw in this trailer. I don’t know what this movie needs but kids will be beside themselves just to see this thing. My words are essentially moot and unimportant even as I write this.

    DARKNESS (2002)

    Director: Jaume Balaguero
    Cast: Anna Paquin, Lena Olin, Iain Glen, Stephan Enquist, Giancarlo Giannini, Fele Martinez, Fermi Reixach
    Release: June 18, 2004
    Synopsis: A teenage girl (Paquin) moves into a remote countryside house with her family, only to discover that their gloomy new home has a horrifying past that threatens to destroy the family.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (Quick Time)

    Prognosis: Nice. Real Nice.

    Creepy is good. Two year old creepy, sitting on a shelf somewhere looking for a domestic audience, is an inherently horrific and nervous place to be.

    I am happy to see Anna Paquin jumping into the horror genre (I know some semantic specific folks might take umbrage for movies like this that “desecrate” what is true horror, but deal with it for right now.). I am hopeful that a certain cliché comes close to coming true which has everything to do with her getting scintillatingly wild with some forgettable dude before a psychotic ax murderer hopped up on lime Pixie Stix busts up the Cinemax after midnight nude fest. Alas, I know I will be disappointed on all levels pertaining to this flick but I’ll cheerfully take the fact that Anna is in this thing as compensation. She is, in actuality, one of the brightest spots for women in film that’s working today. She’s hasn’t had a lot of stupendous roles but you can’t deny her charm in X2, X-MEN or even in the PIANO. Horror, for her, is a new direction.

    As a kid I grew up on a steady diet on Freddy, Jason, PHANTASM, SALEM’S LOT (still freaks me out to this day), and healthy doses of TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRES (part two is a solid sequel, don’t kid yourself on this fact). What I like about this trailer, then, is the mood it creates. While it isn’t as exploitative as those others I mentioned, there is definitely a genuine effort here to make everything feel uneasy and slightly evil.

    Right from the word go the trailer is bathed in blacks, grays, and very muted whites. Anna drops some foreshadowing that the kid that starts the trailer, a nearly pound for pound replica of the twerp from THE RING, is afraid of his own father. Good. Immediately there are some familial issues going on that are going unaddressed and will hopefully end, somehow someway, in some violence.

    Cut to Anna picking up a phone, a creepy kid voice on the other end saying something crazy, but before you try to understand what the hell is being said, a lighting bolt flashes and the silhouettes of people sitting in chairs in front of Anna flickers quickly as the scene cuts away to a bloody hand and then an eerie, sustained banging on a door becomes the noise you incessantly hear as the other thespians are introduced. Let me say bravo to the filmmakers who used a tank topped Anna jiggling down a darkened hallway making my one wish (see intro) closer to coming true, for including a Lena Olin in this craziness, and for convincing Giancarlo Giannini to go along for what looks like a fairly thrilling ride.

    After the intros are out of the way, and the sound of creepy banging continues in the audio background, it all stops to let Giancarlo let us all know, cliché trumpet please, “no one can stop it.” Stop what, you ask? I have no clue! And who cares as the last half of this trailer is filled with great cut scenes, a great soundtrack, a precision dropped F-bomb, ghostly kids (hey, did they rip a page out of How To Blend The Ring and The Devil’s Backbone handbook?), chicks screaming, and the best part of it all? It didn’t give away jack about what the hell is happening to this family. I don’t even know if they can be called a family, but I’m glad I don’t have that information.

    Dimension, as a distributor, has been responsible for a good amount of flicks that live on the fringes of the video store shelf. BELOW, EQUILIBRIUM, and even the popular SCREAM come to mind, but it has also unleashed holy terror like MIMIC, HALLOWEEN: H20, PHANTOMS, yo, and even HIGHLANDER 3: ENDGAME. They have a good record and it seems to be that they either really nail what they’re selling because they believe it will find its audience, either at the theaters or the secondary video market, or they are dooming one more flaccid picture to the horrors of the cut out bin at the local Wal-Mart.

    THE INCREDIBLES (2004)

    Director: Brad Bird
    Cast: Brad Bird, Holly Hunter, Samuel L. Jackson, Jason Lee, Craig T. Nelson, John Ratzenberger, Wallace Shawn, Sarah Vowell
    Release: November 5, 2004
    Synopsis: Bob Paar used to be one of the world’s greatest superheroes (known to all as “Mr. Incredible”), saving lives and fighting evil on a daily basis. But now, fifteen years later, Bob and his wife (a famous former superhero in her own right) have adopted civilian identities and retreated to the suburbs to live normal lives with their three kids. Now he’s a clock-punching insurance claims adjuster fighting boredom and a bulging waistline. Itching to get back into action, Bob gets his chance when a mysterious communication summons him to a remote island for a top-secret assignment.

    View Trailer:
    * Small, Medium, Large (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Positive.

    The best way to say how much I enjoyed this trailer would be to say that I was smiling throughout the entire thing.

    While FINDING NEMO ranked the lowest loved Pixar film for me (you really can only take so much of Albert Brooks’ neurotic voice for so long), it still fares better than anything else any other studio has tried to do using traditional animation techniques (raise your hand if you loved TREASURE PLANET. Thought so.) What makes Pixar so formidable as a company, and as a marketplace competitor, that specializes in computer generated movies is their focus on having a good, solid story that can be enjoyed by both the child and adult contingent of the movie going audience and is the basis, a foundation, to everything else they do. Most of the other studios give lip service to the fact that every animated story starts off with a good story but there is a reason why Pixar will continue to dominate this landscape. That’s why Dreamworks had a hit with Shrek and the same reason why THE INCREDIBLES looks like a fun romp of shared fun for all.

    What is exciting about the trailer for THE INCREDIBLES is that it opens up bathed in a red hue. A camera sweeps through a CGI landscape of a city, the movie logos of Pixar’s previous adventures making it very clear to the kiddies what is coming, a creative way to prime the childhood mind before hitting them with the new stuff. Lest we believe that this will be an empty trailer of just hype and literally not one real substantive shot of footage, which is often the case for animated pictures, we get Mr. Incredible himself, Craig T. Nelson, in full regalia, tapping on a microphone and mumbling to himself about his strength in relation to the small mic bud he is supposed to be talking into. With the first gag out of the way, the trailer dumps some nitrous oxide into its engine as it starts showing extended clips, good clips, of the movie.

    Not since TOY STORY have I wanted to see an animated feature like this. It shows so much for a movie that isn’t coming out until November. There is a great bit about the impenetrable, physical nature of Elastigirl’s battle suit (notice the attention to detail the rockets on the side are given) and Frozone’s diatribe on the nature of secret identities in relation to female to male relationships. The fact that Samuel L. Jackson is playing the part of Frozone is wonderfully delightful if for no other reason than his voice is such a resonant calling card of his abilities as an actor.

    The music is reminiscent for the opening credits of MONSTERS INC. and the very last moments of this trailer can do nothing but leave you with a good feeling. Frozone lives in an apartment. He hangs his uniform on the wall for ease of use. It’s missing just when he needs it. Immediately, and I’m fairly sure it’s his wife he calls out to, he asks where his super suit is. He yells it out, actually, and gets a lippy answer in return. The ensuing outburst, Sam Jackson style, is heightened by his need to use it and save people while all he’s getting is attitude. Good stuff.

    Brad Bird, the man behind the lens and script, should be known in animated circles for his work on the much maligned by many an audience when it was in the theater, THE IRON GIANT. He also wrote an insanely funny short on AMAZING STORIES which had about as much influence on my views about what was funny animation when I was a wee lad of about 10 when it aired as anything else. Some good things are in alignment to make this a great picture and I am sure, nearly positive, this will be another notch in the belt of Pixar.

    May 14, 2004

    Trailer Park: Let’s See Yo’ ID

    Filed under: Columns,Trailer Park — admin @ 2:29 am

    E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES

    By Christopher Stipp

    May 14, 2004

    LET’S SEE YO’ ID

    Without messing around, and with the exception of paraphrasing some Ice Cube above, the trailer that is running for THE BOURNE SUPREMACY has some great weight behind it. Without a doubt there is car chasing much gritter-looking than anything in THE ITALIAN JOB and a little more explosive action than in RONIN. While the latter mixed foreign cities with 4-wheel action with great effectiveness, I do hope BOURNE replicates its sleeper status as a great, well-thought-out action pic. If you do yourself a favor this week and have the chance to look at least one of these movies, make it this one. Trailers can only tell so much, and can hide a lot, but the advertising for this flick sells a pile of crap well if that’s the case.

    That’s all I need to yammer on about for this week so if the mood hits you right and you just want to let it go, shoot an email and let me know whatever random thought crosses your mind.

    Enjoy.

    SPEILBURGH (2004)

    Director: Andrew W. Zehner
    Cast: Sam Nicotero, John Williams, Grant Bhyron, Madeliene Gainers, Billie-Jo Stewart
    Release: April 10th, 2004
    Synopsis: Wanna-be filmmaker Steven Speilburgh gets wrapped up in a mob-organized drug ring when ecstasy gets delivered to the theatre in candy boxes. If you’re a fan of MALLRATS and CLERKS… You’ll love this back and forth comedy about movie theatre employees and the situations they “try” and handle. Remember…His name may sound the same as a big time director, but this time the adventure isn’t on the big screen…it’s in the lobby.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Positive.

    It’s nice to see so many people take a stab at comedy in the independent market. While there are some missteps and awkward moments of dialogue here, there are some elements to this trailer that prevent this movie from going into a complete freefall.

    The trailer does itself a favor with being tongue-in-cheek about the name thing right from the start. The comparison to the legendary filmmaker Spielberg and the guy in this movie who is a director on a smaller scale with the name of Speilburgh is a good premise. As with any movie created around a comedic premise the question then becomes whether the movie can elevate itself over that and produce something amusing.

    One of the first people, nay, the very first person, we see on the screen, is a fairly tight shot of Speilburgh’s boss. His name is irrelevant as his appearance says it all in spades. He’s a wide lapel wearing, scummy looking, prototypical tyrant of the working class he most definitely is and the guy, in all his sleaziness, admonishes our protagonist, Speilburgh, for being late to work. It’s a little over-the-top (not to be confused with the Stallone stalwart), but comedy can be that way and it’s fine.

    We get to see that Speilburgh works in a theater, imagine that, and we are introduced to his co-workers. We get an obnoxious, lippy friend; a hot chick, possibly the guy’s girlfriend; a retard who rips tickets (no one likes a retard for comedic effect more than me); another girl who works the frontline with Speilburgh; and then we get some unseemly guys who come looking for the Speilburgh’s manager, not knowing he inadvertently OD’s on some ecstasy in the previous ten seconds of film, and who start trouble with the rest of the movie theater crew in pursuit of the drugs which seem to belong to them. Somehow through this convoluted concoction there is a semblance of plot and manages to be quite funny.

    The best friend role, played by a guy who is easily a ringer for Joe Lo Truglio of MTV’s defunct The State sketch comedy series, does his job well as he tries to explain to Speilburgh that what looks like packages of Junior Mints is a little more powerful than your average chocolate. Even Jay, the ticket ripping retard, has some Screech-like qualities that are likable and could afford to give the film more than a couple good moments of fun. However, as with everything, there are some points of contention.

    The goombas sent to pick up the drugs seem flimsy facsimiles of the real thing; I want to believe these guys can do some damage, bust a kneecap or punch in a face, but I’m not really feeling it. We also get some random guy who leads the very same heavies to the deceased manager and says matter-of-factly, “I see dead people.” I wasn’t sure if it was supposed to be ironic, funny or seriously out of place. Another line that made me question some of the other dialogue is when one of the guys who is shaking down the joint gets pinned on the ground, and is visibly upset, and let’s us all know that Speilburgh is dead but he, “just doesn’t know it yet.” Thanks, Brandon Lee, I knew you were still alive out there in the great beyond. We do, however, get some redemption in the form of Speilburgh as action hero, armed with nothing but a pellet gun. I liked this kind of thing in MEN AT WORK (Charlie Sheen’s best cinematic work to date) and VACATION and I like it here. This kind of situation also reminds me of the Ben Stiller parody of DIE HARD in a grocery store. It has an absurdist element that plays really well in the few moments we have to digest it.

    One of the marks of good art is what it can evoke. Film is no different. While I do think there are some groaner lines and uninspired camera work in places I would still want to see this thing from start to finish if for no other reason than the film has promise to be better as a sum of all of its parts. The Farrelly’s aren’t known for their great use of cinematography, and not every joke of theirs sail out of the park, but they do have a handle on how to pace a comedy. If the trailer is any indication, this film has the potential of being a very effective comedy but only if there’s real originality, and not a gimmick, at its core.

    BEFORE SUNSET (2004)

    Director: Richard Linklater
    Cast: Ethan Hawke, Julie Delpy, Richard Linklater
    Release: July 2, 2004 (Limited)
    Synopsis: It’s nine years after Jesse and Celine first met in BEFORE SUNRISE. Now, they encounter one another on the French leg of Jesse’s book tour.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (Windows Media, Real Player)

    Prognosis: Positive.

    I would like to see this film. I want to see this film.

    Apart from being one of the better actors to have successfully gone through puberty on screen, Ethan Hawke definitely has a modicum of talent. While TRAINING DAY was certainly a watershed moment for his popular movie man image, nothing can hold a candle to the EXPLORERS; when that treasure of a film, embodying many childhood fantasies of my own, comes on Saturday afternoon television, usually between a Billy Mays infomercial for Oxi Clean and an Andy Griffith marathon, life just stops. I could easily watch that film again and again. It is of concern to me, then, that the original movie that is this current film’s bookend, BEFORE SUNRISE, is something I have yet to experience. Watching the opening to this trailer, and seeing the Ethan Hawke I couldn’t stomach almost a decade ago, I could possibly see why that is the case.

    It is of no surprise, then, that the trailer starts with Ethan circa 1995 (the hip, urban Ethan. The I-can-be-a-novelist-too Ethan. The REALITY BITES, but not for Ethan, pre-GATTACA Ethan.) While I can appreciate Richard Linklater’s ability as a filmmaker, the movie drips schmaltzy romanticism in a way that even now I have a hard time appreciating. However, as the premise unfolds, and as Ethan woos Ms. Delpy for the first time in Vienna I like where it is going. The two of them explore what “could be” with a complete stranger as they spend one evening together; fine, a little carnival action, a little kissy kissy, and a quick hump. I’m thankful I could sum it up in so few words.

    Fast-forward nine years and the trailer opens anew with some Ang Lee HULK split screen action, one of a few times it does this, as Ethan pops in a small shop in Paris to see his old one-night stand. This is the kind of situation usually reserved for Ricki Lake but the moment is demure and sweet. In the nine years since, we can see that Delpy has aged well (girl is as plain as the missionary position, but it’s nice to see a woman with a very pleasing aesthetic in a role that would otherwise be filled by a young bimbo.) and that Ethan needs to eat a sandwich or two. Seriously. The man looks gaunt, even giving him 10 pounds of camera weight. The two of them then bound off for an afternoon in what one thinks will be an exploration of what could be with someone who could have been. Again, it’s kind of sweet.

    The movie seems to be all about them. There is lots of talking seems to be the order of the day, and that’s really fine by me, as this is Linklater and in his hands this, hopefully, will be a nice elevation above FRENCH KISS and FORGET PARIS where there the city of Paris is treated with a romanticism that invades the plot needlessly. There are great punctuating moments of Ethan talking about the nature of his infatuation for Delpy and how he is a man on the verge of dissolving into molecules. It’s sappy and all that crap but I am going on the record as I will happily go willingly, even making her think it’s one of “her” selections so I can have an excuse to see SPIDER-MAN 2 the following weekend, a film this is ostensibly trying to counter-program against.

    I would also like to point out, if you do check out the trailer, and like the music running underneath it, to pick up Long Distance by Parisian’s own Ivy. They were, without compunction, the perfect choice for this trailer and it’s nice to give props to trailers that incorporate a nice sound without bringing out old pop standards from the 80’s or 90’s that severely ill fit a trailer’s storyline.

    COLLATERAL (2004)

    Director: Michael Mann
    Cast: Tom Cruise, Jamie Foxx, Jada Pinkett Smith, Mark Ruffalo, Peter Berg, Bruce McGill
    Release: August 6, 2004
    Synopsis: Foxx plays a Los Angeles cab driver forced to serve as a chauffeur to a contract killer (Cruise) on a string of hits. Ruffalo will star as a detective on the trail of Cruise’s character.

    View Trailer:
    * VARIOUS (Windows Media, QuickTime, Real Plater)

    Prognosis: Positive.

    Jaime Foxx as an unsuspecting cab driver, and possible comedic foil, to Tom Cruise’s violent hit man isn’t really selling me in this trailer.

    As the trailer opens up Foxx is gets his cab ready for a paying fare, picks up Cruise, and they have a small conversation. While this seemingly simplistic series of events unfold, the shots of downtown L.A. fade in/fade out/fade in/fade out. It takes a few moments for the trailer to get into the groove of things but it sets the story up quick and that gets applause from me. Cruise speaks off-screen, telling Foxx what he would like to hire him for the night, and this is very effective for two reasons. 1) People who see this in the theater won’t become enamored with Cruise as they whisper to their significant other “we’ve got to see this because Tom Cruise is in it” and miss the point of what is happening on the screen and 2) It allows the eye to soak in the nighttime of L.A. and understand this movie starts and ends in one night.

    LAX at night, a helicopter following the streets below and using L.A. for the backdrop, images that flood the screen as the trailer unfolds, evokes images from HEAT and I cannot say for sure if that was more coincidental than it was intentional, but it did get me back into the same mood about why I loved Mann’s 1995 ode to contemporary police work, police life and the bad guys who run roughshod all over them. The trailer exudes a kind of confidence that Mann knows how to capture.

    The mood changes, however, as we get a good look at silver-haired Cruise as he strides forward out of the camera’s view, leaving us with a not so desirable look at Foxx enjoying a hoagie inside his cab. Essentially, a body falls on the car (the windows blowing out always make a great effect regardless of the make or model, be that Hyundai or Yugo), Foxx gets out, stunned, and Tom, glibly, fesses that he’s the one who killed the guy. They stand there. Somehow it feels awkward. Before anyone gets the chance to think about why Foxx is standing there like a bumbling idiot and not trying to beat down a man who is not currently holding his gun (dumbass), Cruise’s voice chimes in that Foxx will drive him around in his cab, let him do this thing, and should Foxx do it to plan he “might make it through the night.” I know, it’s a groaner of a line but I am sure men all across the land will be inspired to see the movie based on that sound bite.

    The quick clips start shuffling in from there: there’s a shot of a gun loading, of Tom running, some chairs breaking glass, a coyote crossing the street (!), some night clubbing, some of Tom trying a new dance technique called the head bob and weave, of Foxx trying to look cool, of Tom shooting a gun between his legs while on his tuchus (As Men on Film would say, “I ain’t even gonna touch it.”), and even some more glass shattering. After seeing this trailer the film feels like something out of a Nakatomi high rise auctioneer in downtown L.A. with the exception that this takes place on the street. And where the hell is Ruffalo in all of this? Nowhere to be found in this trailer, I say.

    Michael Mann likes taking his time between directing. In the “˜90s he only directed three vehicles (THE LAST OF THE MOHICANS, HEAT and THE INSIDER) so hopefully this will be a movie worth the extended wait since his last project, 2001’s ALI. If it isn’t, which could happen if Foxx feels the need to be a much not needed comedic relief character, then we need only wait until next year when Cruise and Mann team up again in THE FEW.

    CATWOMAN (2004)

    Director: Pitof
    Cast: Halle Berry, Sharon Stone, Benjamin Bratt, Lambert Wilson, Alex Borstein, Michael Massee, Frances McDormand
    Release: July 23, 2004
    Synopsis: Catwoman is the story of shy, sensitive artist Patience Philips (Halle Berry), a woman who can’t seem to stop apologizing for her own existence. She works as a graphic designer for Hedare Beauty, a mammoth cosmetics company on the verge of releasing a revolutionary anti-aging product. When Patience inadvertently happens upon a dark secret her employer is hiding, she finds herself in the middle of a corporate conspiracy. What happens next changes Patience forever. In a mystical twist of fate, she is transformed into a woman with the strength, speed, agility and ultra-keen senses of a cat. With her newfound prowess and feline intuition, Patience becomes Catwoman, a sleek and stealthy creature balancing on the thin line between good and bad. Like any wildcat, she’s dangerous, elusive and untamed. Her adventures are complicated by a burgeoning relationship with Tom Lone (Benjamin Bratt), a cop who has fallen for Patience but cannot shake his fascination with the mysterious Catwoman, who appears to be responsible for a string of crime sprees plaguing the city.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (Windows Media, Real Player)

    Prognosis: Um, yeah, about as solid of a Negative as they come.

    Ok. The fan boy complaints are at a din, although I couldn’t really tell that for sure as the sounds of nerds everywhere falling over on their pocket protectors and comic books (hermetically sealed in Polypropylene bags with 6 3/4 x 10 3/8 acid free backing boards, of course), laughing at all the advance photos of Catwoman are almost too loud to differentiate between the two.

    I will not speak here on any authority about the Catwoman franchise in the DC universe; I parked my hooptie ride and threw away my keys over at Marvel almost two decades ago after seeing a sweet commercial for what I thought was a G.I. Joe cartoon only for the announcer man to tell me to check out the rest in that month’s issue of the G.I. Joe comic series. It was a sleazy tactic to move books as I bought into it and have never looked at another publishing house longingly ever since. It is with a little authority, then, that I speak to the larcenous way in which Patience Philips, Halle Berry, embodies a character that should have been envisioned differently. Watching the trailer, though, to a certain point, almost everything looks like it was in place.

    “From a life that was taken”¦”

    Some nice looking, and silent, script appears on the screen; it’s one of the best uses of it so far this year as we’re saved from a crappy voice over. A body floats in the water (“Ooo”¦is that a dead woman?”) with a bright, shimmering light shining above it.

    “A new one will be born.”

    There is some good, stock techno pumping that punctuates the beginning and then pops up in the middle of the trailer that helps this thing along and after we get some flashes of something landing on its feet (“Could it be her? I don’t know!”) there is absolutely no reason to be a playa hater just yet. We get a superb close-up shot of a muddy faced Halle (“Is that a Revlon mask?”) who then opens her eyes to reveal a normal pupil that turns into, gasp, a cat’s eye; I’ve liked this look ever since I felt drawn to it by Nastassja Kinski’s milky white face on the CAT PEOPLE tape cover; it’s the VHS copy that keeps creeping me out at Blockbuster as I troll around the horror section since 1984.

    Halle is looking feline fine as she straddles a motor bike, sans suit, off to deliver some pussy payback of some sort I guess. There is then a quick shot of her falling, sans suit, and landing on her hands of course. So far everything is popping on all cylinders. Warner Brothers should have been creaming themselves with anticipation to this point. This is when we see the cat suit.

    Um, yeah, I’ve heard of visualization techniques that can help destroy any urge, impulse, desire or path to gratification. This is probably one of the longest seeing-your-grandmother-in-her-underwear visual aides that will provide many a lustful soul gain control of themselves. I can’t decide if the “cat suit,” if you’ll allow me to be so bold to call those shredded ribbons of leather puke a suit of some kind in the first place, is just funny because it looks that way or if it’s because the suit is emblematic of the way Warner Brothers is cobbling together their comic book hero franchise films. I feel embarrassed for the fans that have to endure such “creative freedom” from people ignorant of the simple, basic ways to treat these kinds of properties. First step is respect, kids.

    I won’t scold anyone for anything that isn’t already in that trailer, that’s for real fans to do on their websites, (OMG! CAN YOU BELIEF THAT SOOT? ROTFL! PWN3D!) but if Halle walking around, twirling a bullwhip over her head with as much sexiness as a two-dollar hooker in heat, is any indication, this will be a very interesting opening weekend when it comes. The director, Pitof, has been responsible for some fine visual effects work on ALIEN: RESURRECTION (as to much was his work, and not the lackeys who never get any love, I cannot quantify) and this will be his first real American, directorial project. I hope there is something beneath the surface that will prove me wrong. Alienating the base that buys the company’s books every Wednesday and who are rather vocal already about the appearance of Catwoman, and, I might add, constitute a good chunk of ticket sales and demographic spending power, doesn’t seem like a brilliant move but I will wait and see if my reactions as a comic fan were all for naught. I hope for DC’s sake they are.

    THE BOURNE SUPREMACY (2004)

    Director: Paul Greengrass
    Cast: Matt Damon, Joan Allen, Brian Cox, Julia Stiles, Karl Urban, Franka Potente
    Release: July 23, 2004
    Synopsis: Following the smash worldwide success of 2002’s The Bourne Identity, Universal Pictures brings the second installment of best-selling author Robert Ludlum’s series to the screen with Matt Damon returning as trained assassin Jason Bourne in The Bourne Supremacy.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (QuickTime, Windows Media)

    Prognosis: Positive.

    The throaty sounds of an action movie voice over would usually induce rolled eyes and a disaffected stare at the screen from me. This was still the case as this trailer opens up showing us all, essentially, the ending to THE BOURNE IDENTITY. This is an almost necessary evil so it’s forgiven as it gets to the new story with much haste.

    Matt, as Jason Bourne, is just hanging with his lady on a sandy beach, kickin’ it, when a guy with some very European facial hair (close to the face; some of that three-day George Michael circa 1990’s Faith album cover fuzz) starts shooting with a fairly powerful weapon. What is so odd about this opening, apart that it works to get me engaged, is how disjointed it all feels. I guess I’m just to believe that he was happy, living a good life, someone who isn’t introduced on screen finds him, starts shooting, as Jason leaves town, the trailer forgetting to mention Franka is kidnapped, as he begins an all new cinematic adventure.

    These concerns go away as we get some bad ass slo-mo walking (never fails to impress as a technique) from Damon as he enters an airport, essentially trying to get the honkeys who came to his island paradise and effed it all to hell, and then goes nuts when security brings him to a room and try to detain him. He flees and, what I feel was one of the best shots in a trailer this year, there is a side shot of Matt driving quickly when he gets t-boned by a rapidly moving vehicle. It’s great because it follows from the near moment, almost impact, to full on hit in one shot. It’s sa-weet. Also, on a related tip, if car body counts are your thing, and you couldn’t get your fill by watching Crash (the NC-17 version, natch) again and again, this trailer is a wonderful preview of the kind of Yugo, Peugeot, small car street racing/destroying that will be going on in this movie.

    The money shots just keep coming as the movie seeks to replicate the European feel of the first film (which, in my own stunted opinion, works well not only to show there is an action world outside of Hollywood and Hong Kong but it also might prompt productions that can afford it to use the globe as their own personal moviemaking playground.). There is also an increasing amount of hand-to-hand combat situations Matt seems to find himself in constantly. I am buying into all of it. Damon doesn’t seem to get the accolades he deserves for his work as his contemporaries get (I’m sure his accountant would disagree) but he seems to be working for a role that others would just sleepwalk in. He fits the role because Damon looks exactly un-like what this kind of role calls for.

    Some other points of interest in this trailer would have to be none other than a very alluring Julia Stiles (I’ve got a weakness for Joker-like smiles, what can I say?) who seems to have no other purpose than to simply be The Girl Who Stands Around and Looks Good While Trying Not To Get Fired For Doing Nothing Else and a very pimp looking Brian Cox. Cox actually, and incidentally, is one of the bad things about the trailer. “You’ve got no idea what you’re getting into” is a groaner of a line, for sure, and he says it. He’s guilty by association but it’s enough to take me out of the moment and wonder if there just isn’t another way of portending danger than hearing that same numbing line in any movie where someone knows a rooster will come home to roost.

    There’s no crappy music, the visuals speak for themselves, there is an awesome ending to this thing which I won’t give away (I know, the punk is acting like he’s a reviewing a movie) and it has all the visual ear markings of another sleeper hit. It did enough business overseas, probably helped by its inclusion of foreign locales, I do hope this film gets everything right that the first one did.

    May 7, 2004

    Trailer Park: You, Sir, Are A Winner

    Filed under: Columns,Trailer Park — admin @ 2:30 am

    E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES

    By Christopher Stipp

    May 7, 2004

    YOU, SIR, ARE A WINNER

    This week’s No-Prize goes to reader Donovan K. who illustrated, not to severely pun here, the difference between traditional animation, computer animation and where the new film, APPLESEED, reviewed last week, falls in-between:

    “In your recent review of the APPLESEED trailer you were portraying the film as being traditional with some computer assistance. However it appears to be completely computer animated with the possible exception of some of the backgrounds. APPLESEED appears to be using a technology called NPR (Non Photorealistic Rendering) which attempts to simulate the look of traditional animation while still being 3D animation. The easiest way to tell something is a 3D animated film in the style of 2D is to look at the frame rate and the consistency of objects as they rotate. The higher the frame rate and the smoother the animation of detailed objects the more likely it is you are looking at something computer generated.”

    I have no idea if he’s a lying sack of crap but it sure sounds authoritative to me and it warranted some screen time here. If any of you would like to challenge Donovan’s assertion, or would like his home address to discuss the finer points about what I feel about people who look to correct me with him as he’s dangling out of his window by a bed sheet, feel free to write in.

    This week was a good one for trailers. M. Night Shyamalan did a special last week during a showing of THE SIXTH SENSE and then again, this week, with UNBREAKABLE where he showed a new trailer for THE VILLAGE which, thankfully, helped to shore up the very first trailer which really left me confused and wondering where the hell everyone, besides Joaquin’s odd lip, was. If you were able to see it, and if you had TiVo you were able to blaze right to the good parts, hopefully you’ve seen this is looking pretty good so far. I know many people out there have read the script and have said the “twist” ending is a complete letdown but after SIXTH, SIGNS, and UNBREAKABLE, I am more than willing to postulate M. Night won’t disappoint. If he does, I’ll flambé my words right here and, like any good internet nerd under 16 would assert, vow never to see any of his movies again.

    Comedy, as well, was at the top of my favorites list this week as I had a chance, and really only stumbled upon it, to see the trailer for HAROLD AND KUMAR GO TO WHITE CASTLE. Yes, it’s made by the same guy who did DUDE, WHERE’S MY CAR, but before you run screaming that the apocalypse is nigh check out the trailer. It’s got a little sexual innuendo, some racial humor, some sticky bud references and a little bit more racial humor. I am ashamed for having gone back and watched it a few times but the catch phrase “thank you, come again” was calling me back again and again.

    Excelsior!

    OPEN WATER (2004)

    Director: Chris Kentis
    Cast: Blanchard Ryan, Daniel Travis, Saul Stein, Estelle Lau
    Release: August 6, 2004 (limited)
    Synopsis: Using the endless lapping waves of an infinite blue ocean as his canvas, writer/director/cinematographer Chris Kentis paints a terrifying portrait of primitive human fears and intimate survival in OPEN WATER, the astonishing project washed up from the shores of the truly independent underground. Based on the true story of two married scuba divers left behind by a careless boat crew, then speculating on the shark-infested journey that followed, this drama is so raw and chilling you may find yourself clinging to the moviegoer next to you. Featuring an unapologetically tight lens on the drifting couple, along with photography that uses no digital effects, the film’s unique flow of time slows and bends as water and sky change color and mood around them.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (QuickTime)
    * Medium (QuickTime)
    * Large (QuickTime)

    Progonosis: Positive.

    What’s with divers getting left behind these days?

    First we get some jamoke last week who was forgotten by his three(!) other diving buddies, hopefully all crossed off Christmas card lists, and now, in the trailer for OPEN WATER, we get these two people are left behind during a scuba diving expedition due to a faulty head count. Complete ignorance and letting the fact that it wasn’t one but two heads that went missing, that these two divers realized they were left behind in supposed shark infested waters makes the premise all the more intriguing.

    I bring this all up because when there is a suspension of disbelief, usually when watching a movie like JAWS, for example, we are more apt to feel comfortable in our repeat viewings because of the circumstances surrounding how it’s really just a maniacal shark that attacks ruthlessly. When an element of truth bubbles up to the surface, let’s say in a based on real life events kind of film, coupled with a current story that validates that this could happen at any moment, it makes the buy-in easier and makes the payoff for that investment, if it’s done well, that much more believable and enjoyable. This trailer evokes all these things.

    The DV work here makes great use of the medium. The opening shot of the ocean with foreboding clouds, while good for postcards, does the standard duty of foreshadowing of what’s to come. When the shot fades and the subtle score pipes in, things just get better as the premise is set up (having the Based on True Events line plugged in here helps to establish some cred early for all that comes after) and the filmmaker uses reviews from other publications to let everyone know that his movie won’t completely suck. I liked the visual shimmer effect with the words from movie critics as it’s a small, but noticeable, effort to create a mood for the trailer. After the film’s reputation and critical history are out of the way, lighting flashes and crashes onto the screen and gets to meat of the matter.

    While we never get much dialogue there’s a whole lot of screaming, “Oh my God!”‘s, general histrionics and hyperventilating, there’s also a taste of danger; there are flashes of jellyfish, an unsheathing knife, a shark, but there is also, at the end, a strange serenity. Things are calm and gentle with the same heavy cloud cover that keep the tension afloat until everything fades to black.

    Most of the time with low-budget fare you can usually tell that’s the case and it’s alright. As moviegoers we sometimes forgive things and buy in a little more with a story that looks fairly original just to see how things are put together in the end. With OPEN WATER, a severely low budget indie, the trailer evokes great imagery and a superb premise all in under two minutes.

    ALICE’S MISADVENTURES IN WONDERLAND (2004)

    Director: Robert Rugan
    Cast: Will Keenan, Maggie Henry, Kyle Holman, Chris Garrison
    Release: Fall, 2004
    Synopsis: Life doesn’t make all that much sense to Alice. The answers to life’s little questions seem out of her reach, and she is beginning to question not only her own personal decisions, but an ability to understand the world around her. But when the solution to Alice’s dilemma comes in the form of a bizarre book delivered by a stranger in a gas mask and chemical suit, she doesn’t know exactly what to think.Alice launches into a bizarre journey into the heart of…Wonderland, where a once playful array of characters has “changed” into a horrific collection of the deranged, delusional, and desperate.

    Between a schizophrenic obsessed with game shows; a cave-dwelling guru searching for enlightenment while embracing a hunger for terrible violence and war; a couple of conspiracy junkies looking for a scapegoat; a collection of ethnically diverse children with a bit of a hearing problem and a chip on their shoulders; an albino manservant trying to start a revolution; and a Queen that’s not real comfortable with her/his sexuality, the last thing Alice needs is a vending machine that won’t take her money, after all…the only thing she’s really looking for is…change.

    View Trailer:
    * Low, High (QuickTime)

    Progonosis: Positive.

    There is something so strange and different about this retelling of Alice in Wonderland that I could not help myself from being infinitely amused by the quick pace and originality of this film.

    The trailer opens with Alice speaking off camera. She wishes aloud that she would like to be able to know, should life be compared to a series of multiple choice questions, all the right answers. Then, as we see Alice, stuck in an office environment, from out of nowhere we get the rabbit, at least that what I think it is as I’m trying to do a one-to-one comparison, dressed in a white bio-hazard outfit clad with a green gas mask; who gives Alice a book with the answers she’s looking for; and then decries how he is late a few times in expected succession. By the time you say to yourself “what the fu…” Alice is in an elevator shaft, plunging and screaming every inch, as she ends up knocking on a big red door which looks straight out a 30’s speakeasy. A password is asked of her, a confused look ensues, and then, not missing a beat, Alice is in the middle of a party but it is really not just any party. This one stars, and is being run emceed, by a cross-dresser that looks closely like Frank-N-Furter’s slightly uglier looking twin brother. I don’t remember the Queen being a man, but it works. It’s amusing and it tinkers with convention in a way that my demented sensibilities found acceptable.

    From there we get some great and amusing effects work, one shot in particular is a Princess Leia-esque video message, not to mention some amusing dialogue. Some of the most notable and delightful bantering comes from the Mad Hatter who is played, in this version, as an odd looking man with a white, vampiric eyeball. Again, it works. We also get a guy with a perfectly puffed coif, almost looking like a screen version of the X-Men’s nemesis, Arcade, without trying, in a white suit who I can possibly assume was, well, I just don’t know. There are so many characters that are introduced from here that I just couldn’t keep up with trying to place who was who. It was for the best as the trailer then goes to the point where a hodgepodge of clips starts bursting and popping off the screen. In one of those moments, however, I enjoyed seeing a little black and white tile floor action and it reminded me of the oddness that was Tom Petty’s video for “Don’t Come Around Here No More.” Both of these things embrace the necessarily disjointed ethos of Carroll’s work. As it pertains to the film, there is a danger in using source material that’s been done before as criticism usually compares it with past work and places it in line with other interpretations. However, there is also an element of risk of facing the challenge of not only being on par with other productions, but the pressure to exceed an already high expectation; this all, however, could result in showing how well the job can be done. As singing theater beau Hugh Jackman found out when he took the part of Curly in Oklahoma! (who knew Wolverine had the mutant ability to carry a tune better than any pompous pop star on the open market) there is something to be said about talent that shines through regardless of the material. Obviously, without being privy to knowing how the dialogue and story are cobbled together all I have to go off are the visuals. The entire appearance of this film is eye-catching as the colors are lush, full and vibrant. The cinematography pulls the attention ever so slightly and the trailer is paced quick enough to be intriguing without ever becoming dull.

    OFF THE LIP (2004)

    Director: Robert Mickelson
    Cast: Mackenzie Astin, Marguerite Moreau, Mark Fite, David Rasche
    Release: May 7, 2004 (Limited)
    Synopsis: Kat (Marguerite Moreau), a brand new journalism grad, has landed her first big job. It’s in Hawaii and she couldn’t be more excited to get away from her father (David Rasche) and his expectations. All it requires is an upbeat personality, good instincts and a lot of perseverance. But Kat is finding the work harder than she ever imagined. For one thing, her prey – an elusive big wave surfer named “The Monk” ““ doesn’t intend to be found, and the friendly locals are being somewhat less than helpful. Her uninvited boyfriend (Mackenzie Astin) is driving her crazy, her ex-surfer guide (Mark Fite) has been on the losing end of too many waves, the geek she’s reporting to (Adam Scott) is falling in love with her, and she’s wanted by the FBI. What’s a girl to do?! Kat realizes too late that finding “The Monk” will cost her more than she could ever afford. But can she foresee that she’ll wind up finding herself?

    View Trailer:
    * Small (QuickTime)
    * Medium (QuickTime)
    * Large (QuickTime)

    Progonosis: Positive for your significant other. If that happens to be a man, then he’ll hate it.

    Ever get to the point when you’ll just flip a coin and decide whether or not you’ll see something?

    This isn’t one of the films but I am just wondering, nonetheless. I am confident in my assertion that this film is not for me, my demographic, gender, sex or mental prowess. I’m not boasting some higher knowledge or that I’m above a movie like this but I do know that this film, if you saw it on a marquee somewhere on a Friday night with your old lady, would be one you would want to pick and I’ll tell you why: it’s got enough chick in it to qualify as “one of her choices” and contains the best possibility for good ogling of chicks in bikinis to keep you interested.

    Taking a look at it from the beginning, in an almost Virginia Wolf, “Mrs. Dalloway,” stream-of-consciousness sort of way, the trailer opens up with the generic steel drum/island beat from the WEEKEND AT BERNIE’S soundtrack. We get some fairly generic surfing footage until some no name cracks wise about getting a surf report when the mofo is standing right in front of the waves. It’s a lame joke and the trailer has now burned about 20% of its fuel. We then get the set-up: a reporter of sorts, a lady no less, is going out to find The Monk, an elusive, misanthropic big wave surfer. Unless this is for a magazine or a documentary dedicated to the sport itself, which I hope it is for believability sake, I’m not sure why the hell the woman, played by the fabulously good looking Marguerite Moreau, from WET HOT AMERICAN SUMMER, is packed on a plane and gets sent off to an island looking for a someone who may or may not exist. At this point I’m just hoping I get some additional face time with Marguerite and we do. In spades.

    We get Marguerite looking pretty on a web cam as I hope it’s one of those X-10’s that’ll be used in a risqué manner later, Marguerite looking cute in the pool, and Marguerite looking good just hanging out on land. The only thing I could see these shots doing for the plot is that it helped with was establishing the fact that Marguerite is a more appealing, and better sounding, clone of the Leah Remini variety.

    Now, for the dudes, we start getting our due, however slight it is. We get some screen time with Jim Turner, aka Randee of the Redwoods fame, and before you can say “I know that guy” Marguerite takes her top off. Twice. And as you can stare long enough, trying to make out something behind her suit, David Rasche, who we all know from the ever so solid “Sledge Hammer” series (which, in my own opinion, was a brilliant show to me at 12 years old), and we even get some lingering moments of a man in nothing but a jock who turns out to be one of the guys from “Freaks and Geeks.” This all scores some points on a delight-o-meter (everything but the jock) as does the remaining bits of this trailer which show Marguerite looking beautiful on a surfboard, Marguerite getting it on with some dude, Marguerite stripping yet again (man, this movie better be rated R), and by this time in the trailer you know the rest.

    The possibility of possible nip slippage, however unlikely it is, is enough for me to recommend simply as a date movie. If you’re a guy and want to see an actual surf movie go rent ENDLESS SUMMER, parts one and two, which will give you a better story than I’m feeling this is cracked up to be. It’s not a slam against the movie but the film wasn’t made for a pack of guys. It was made for your girl to drag you, kicking and screaming, against your will, to see.

    ANCHORMAN (2004)

    Director: Adam McKay
    Cast: Will Ferrell, Christina Applegate, David Koechner, Steve Carell, Paul Rudd, Fred Willard, Chris Parnell, Kevin Corrigan, Tara Subkoff, Maya Rudolph
    Release: July 9, 2004
    Synopsis: Will Ferrell stars as Ron Burgundy, the top-rated anchorman in San Diego in the “˜70s. When feminism marches into the newsroom in the form of ambitious newswoman Veronica Corningstone (Applegate), Ron is willing to play along at first – as long as Veronica stays in her place, covering cat fashion shows, cooking, and other “female” interests. But when Veronica refuses to settle for being eye candy and steps behind the news desk, it’s more than a battle between two perfectly coiffed anchor-persons”¦it’s war.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (Windows Media, Real Player)

    Prognosis: Positive.

    To drop a little Aaron Neville, I don’t know much but I know I love Will Ferrell.

    The man has yet to start doing project after project like Ben Stiller but he is visible enough right now that he isn’t wearing out any welcome at all. ANCHORMAN looks to just keep Will’s popularity as a comedic actor on a steady roll. The trailer begins with Will just being Will. He’s a television anchor who doesn’t know he’s on the air. That’s it. However, somehow, someway, Will makes it funny just by employing his natural mannerisms as he sits idle. When he tells a woman off camera that she looks good and that “maybe don’t wear a bra next time” it just fits. Even though it doesn’t look very amusing to scribe it down on paper or try and convey it to someone in a conversation but Will works by taking easy, simple lines and filtering them through his own comedic sensibility. Shortly after Will’s character learns he’s on the air the trailer just sets up the rest of the story but it gives us good looks at how Ron Burgundy is going to act throughout the rest of the movie.

    He’s a quintessential seventies misogynistic pig bachelor who is boisterous, obnoxious and represents everything that was wrong with sexual harassment. It’s great. From cannonballs into his pool during a party, his wolfish moustache that sits like a remnant of the porn industry around that time, to his slapping of a strange woman’s ass and exclaiming “love that fanny” Will embraces the role in a way that I hope works well in a full length feature. He’s the new go-to guy for comedy and for good reason. Apart from the box office grosses, Will actually helps those around him look better. It is for this reason why having Fred Willard, Steve Carell, Paul Rudd, Vince Vaughn, and Christina Applegate is a good thing. The latter I mention only because it will probably help a guy’s chances of seeing the move (Going To The Movies With A Lady tip #46: When seeing a trailer for a new film that you know your woman will probably say no to, increase your chances of seeing said movie by grabbing hold of any moment when a woman appears on the screen in the trailer and mention that moment more furiously than a dog whipping a caught bird back and forth in its mouth.)

    This is the second film Ferrell has helped pen, the first being the guilty pleasure A NIGHT AT THE ROXBURY, and is credited for having a large hand in creating. It will be interesting to see how well he’s written his own part should it work out or if he should just stick to letting other people create vehicles for him.

    HAROLD & KUMAR GO TO WHITE CASTLE (2004)

    Director: Danny Leiner
    Cast: John Cho, Kal Penn, Anthony Anderson, Ethan Embry, Luis Guzmán, Neil Patrick Harris, Jamie Kennedy, David Krumholtz, Ryan Reynolds, Eddie Kaye Thomas, Fred Willard
    Release: July 30, 2004
    Synopsis: Harold & Kumar Go to White Castle follows two likeable underdogs who set out on a Friday night quest to satisfy their craving for White Castle hamburgers and end up on a mind-altering road trip of epic proportions.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (QuickTime)
    * Medium (QuickTime)
    * Large (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Positive.

    This movie looks like it’s going to be fairly amusing. At the very least, HAROLD AND KUMAR GO TO WHITE CASTLE will get a lot of play in dormitories and high school sleepovers in the secondary DVD market where the dialogue will be memorized and be retold to close friends until any semblance of humor is sucked dry.

    I’ve said it a few times but, again, comedy is all very subjective. You, on the one hand, appreciate the humor of the PINK PANTHER series. I, to provide a contrast, love jokes that are base, juvenile, and will point to STRANGE BREW as one of the comedic stalwarts in my collection. Should you find yourself pooh-poohing movies that you feel are beneath you, you’re probably not going to like this movie. Should this be the case, feel free to leave now, no hard feelings, and I’ll see you again bright and early next Friday, right here. For those of you who are still here I will tell you why this is going to be worth seeing, in order as they happen in the trailer.

    1. Unknowingly making fun of girls’ appearance is good way to start things off nice and easy and always make for good comedic relief. (For additional examples, look to a good portion of LIAR, LIAR and the grocery store scene from THEY LIVE)

    Seeing how this movie is about Harold and Kumar it should stand to reason that we ought to get to know them a little better. Here it is: Harold is Asian and Kumar is Indian. They are both losers and go to college. With the deep character studies out of the way, it’s off to making fun of their ethnicities.

    2. Making fun of other people’s nationalities, as long as it’s done amusingly, will always be funny. For example, in this trailer a cop stands in front of Kumar and asks him what kind of name is Kumar and whether it’s spelled with, “5 o’s or 2 u’s?” Priceless.

    When Kumar and Harold decide to tune in and drop out of consciousness with a little marijuana, and the subsequent drug trip transports them to a jungle, clad with a cheetah (just watch it, ok?), it brings us to point three.

    3. Drugs, especially pot, when used for comedy, no matter what, will never get old.

    The two guys leave their apartment in search of the delicious squares of slider heaven and begin their journey. So far I hope you’re keeping up with the plot. Let me recap: essentially they get high and look for food. As they depart from their apartment, debating just outside their door about whether one should go back and get their cell phone, it just reinforces point number three. And what would a road trip flick be without some nudity, right? Even though I could care less how the trailer suddenly has Harold and Kumar in some blonde’s bedroom, it reminds me of another point taught religiously in the Todd Phillips School of Moviemaking.

    4. Nudity is next to godliness. ‘Nuff said.

    While the only real mild annoyance here is the alterna-lite rock jam that is placed near the middle of the trailer, and runs throughout the rest, a real treat that takes the attention away from the music comes in the form of Neil Patrick Harris aka Doogie Howser (Who taught me, if ever in a fight, to pop a jive turkey’s eardrums by cupping a hand and bitchslapping the side of their head). It’s good to see Neil playing along as himself, most certainly in a self-effacing manner, for some good, genuinely amusing moments, however brief they may be.

    As we near the end, the trailer still packed with some good sound bites, “thank you, come again” springs to mind, and there is some really funny physical humor that defies any real good description with words. What really sold me, though, and this is fact, was how they did not give out the actors’ names in the movie. Instead, the voice over tells us the movie stars “that Asian guy from AMERICAN PIE”, “that Indian guy from VAN WILDER,” and is directed by, “the white guy who directed DUDE, WHERE’S MY CAR?” I realize some sect of the movie population will be offended by those kinds of introductions and there will be many others who will try to convince me that VAN WILDER was actually a funny movie (Ryan Reynolds has a cameo in this film, too) but you just can’t help but feel sorry for those kinds of people. It’s a comedy, after all, and if we can’t make fun of Asian guys, white guys (of which “The Chappelle Show” has cornered the market on white guy jokes) or any kind of ethnicity at all then where are we, really, as a culture and nation? This is the kind of crap that will always be funny and if it is seen as anything other than good-natured ribbing then that’s their problem as those kinds of people go into their hole, watch the FRIENDS finale a few more times, convince themselves there will never be another comedy that good again, and have a good cry.

    April 30, 2004

    Trailer Park: You It Is Slow, Attach That Above

    Filed under: Columns,Trailer Park — admin @ 2:31 am

    E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES

    By Christopher Stipp

    April 30, 2004

    YOU IT IS SLOW, ATTACH THAT ABOVE

    Translators are so much fun.

    I wanted a really good Japanese translation to “stick it up you’re a$$” in this week’s theme of Why I’ve Been Thinking About The Trailer For APPLESEED For The Past Seven Days and what I think of those who believe otherwise about the viability of animation in today’s thrill and chill landscape.

    After seeing the demise of Fox’s traditional animation studio here in Arizona and the way contemporary animation is barely creeping by as films like FINDING NEMO and SHREK are swishing by on the autobahn of box office grosses I was wondering if I just had just grown up in a different time and possibly that the time was nigh to embrace computer generated tall tales as the standard. Like Dianne Wiest finally giving in to Edward Herrmann’s vampiric spell, I was almost ready to believe the hype. Then I saw APPLESEED and remembered why I always enjoyed the visual splatter of those who could do it better than American studios ever could. I saved plenty of vitriol below for the review so feel free to enjoy the heat that burns off the screen.

    In other trailer news, a new updated one for THE VILLAGE appeared this week and, thank god, it seems to ratchet up the tension better than the first one did. I have been hearing, and reading, too many people who may, or may not, have read the final shooting script only to say the trademark twist ending that M. Night is known for is beyond elementary understanding, that is, it is about as lame as a dying mule. I’ve been a huge supporter and champion of M. Night’s work and I reserve the right to say the latest trailer is great, his last movie SIGNS was a thrilling addition to his canon and there is no evidence, other than speculation, to say it sucks just yet. If it does, I promise to be the first one to fess up and admit it.

    Enjoy the offerings this week as I bumped a trailer off the list just so I could spotlight THE CORPORATION. Also, if you do nothing else this week and are a fan of animation in the slightest, do me a favor and watch the APPLESEED trailer. Let me know if you think I’m just being brainwashed and awed by guns, robots, chicks flying off rooftops in the middle of the night and finely detailed explosions.

    LEMONY SNICKET’S A SERIES OF UNFORTUNATE EVENTS (2004)

    Director: Brad Silberling
    Cast: Jim Carrey, Timothy Spall, Liam Aiken, Emily Browning, Meryl Streep, Jude Law (voice of Lemony Snicket)
    Release: December 17, 2004
    Synopsis: Jim Carrey stars as Count Olaf, a wily villain with clever disguises and outrageous schemes, who is bent on swindling the Baudelaire orphans out of their family fortune. Featuring the unique blend of intelligence, irony and irreverence that readers of all ages have discovered in Lemony Snicket’s best-selling books.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (QuickTime)

    Progonosis: Positive.

    Jim Carrey never ceases to amaze.

    I was in absolute shock when I was at an early screening of THE MAJESTIC a while back as I thought I had laid eyes on one of the very worst films that Carrey or Frank Darabont had ever put into the ecosystem. Of course ACE VENTURA 2 comes close but this was made with the intention of being a good film, right? I thought it was me or I was just having a bad day at the movies. It was nice to know I wasn’t wrong, in the long run, but I wasn’t very happy, either, when BRUCE ALMIGHTY made its way to the populace. I realize how many millions it made, but you can’t really put a price tag on what made that comedy seem like the most plainest, dull, puerile and lifeless ninety minutes but I would estimate it at about $8.50 and a box of Goobers. With ETERNAL SUNSHINE OF THE SPOTLESS MIND, however, everything was again right with the universe as Jim put on a performance I not only am still in wonderment of, but a role, if there ever was one, he really deserved the kind of acclaim usually reserved for Oscar contenders. Jim was really “on” in a way that other actors rarely demonstrate and with this new trailer for LEMONY SNICKET he looks to be doing it again.

    Unlike a Mike Myers in a full body cat suit or even the dreadful Grinch persona that Jim donned for that other Seuss movie, Jim’s mannerisms and cadence is enveloping in this trailer. It opens with three young children who are orphaned after a fire kills their parents and are brought to the estate of Count Olaf to live out their youthful days. What you can feel as soon as the trailer opens is the style in which this film is being shot. I am reminded of a Tim Burton, circa SLEEPY HOLLOW, with a little more light and color added for kicks, but there is a sensation of everything being dipped in a very inviting yet somber hue. Watching Carrey literally move in this thing is a wonder. His uttering of the phrase “left behind” reminds me of a Carrey who is channeling some of the more original, and funny, aspects of Ace Ventura; there’s even a moment when he does a little impromptu T-Rex strutting I found to be reminiscent of the kind of performer I never thought to would see again.

    The sets look dazzling in their detail, the cinematography, in some places, is a wonder to behold, and the costuming is spot-on. The kids who play Carrey’s wards don’t look Fanning-cute or too perfect for their roles. It’s nice they went with some unknowns as it lets Carrey just run with things. One of the other things you notice, however, was that there was no Meryl Streep, no Billy Connolly and no Luis Guzman. Since this is just really only a television spot for a film that doesn’t land until December of this year I am sure the other actors will get their due. So far, Carrey is getting his and this looks like a deservedly well-won role.

    KISSES AND CAROMS (2004)

    Director: Vincent Rocca
    Cast: Nicole Rayburn, Drew Wicks, Nikki Stanzione, Ryan Parks
    Release: Coming Soon
    Synopsis: Kisses And Caroms is your typical romantic comedy. Boy meets Girl, Boy has Sex with Girl and her friend, Boy and Girl live happily ever after. Or do they?With the help of a shot gun wielding psycho therapist, a sexy got it together new age girl, a horny housewife, a sex obsessed best friend, his loving ex-girlfriend and the antics of Breaktime’s zany offbeat customers (including a naked white guy and a little person), will Zack finally figure out what he wants in life?

    View Trailer:
    * Low (QuickTime)
    * Medium (Quicktime)
    * Large (QuickTime)

    Progonosis: Positive-Negative.

    There were some very funny moments in this trailer. I am not sure if all of it worked for me but I will take it from the top.

    The trailer begins with a normal green banner that says that the trailer has been approved for, wait, no it does not. It says that it has NOT been approved for all audiences and I already know what general direction we’re headed after I see this.

    The real meat of this clip opens up with a man in bed with two women. It’s our protagonist and the voiceover, a rather plain and ineffective one at that, essentially lets us know that this guy’s life will not be going in a pleasant direction for that day. Great. I like that. In a bed with two chicks and things are going to go south on the man? I’m in. However, there are some things that I have to go before I would be motivated enough to see this movie.

    1. Get rid of that music that plays in the background. I don’t know what Gary Numan fire sale the track was picked up at, but I would definitely ask for a refund. Annoying, repetitive, and distracting.

    2. If it was a Commodore 64 that created the colorful palates that let us see each character and get an idea for what their role is in the movie, get an upgrade to at least a 386 to craft something a little more contemporary. Unless, however, you are being ironic or purposefully low-budget with things and to that I say stick with it because it works very well in that regard.

    3. Man ass. There is a rather long, sustained shot here and I am not sure if my watching, and watching, and watching it had anything to do with how I felt about the trailer as a whole. You know what, keep the man ass in as there is definitely a contingent of individuals who appreciate that sort of thing.

    With those foibles neatly wrapped and taken care of this is what works very well and deserves some attention:

    1. The movie’s main character, Zack, seems like a genuinely enjoyable and likable actor. I can’t seem to place where I’ve seen him, I know I have or at least feel I have, but he has a familiarity that would play well in a comedy and this role works. Best part of the trailer is to watch him work the comedic angle. There is a moment when he is describing what a black Jesus is doing in a depiction of all black rendering of the Last Supper and it’s great; his timing and delivery make it work.

    2. The direction. It’s hard to make it out between some of the more sloppily stitched together scenes but it is there. Rocca has some good comedic eye in this trailer for what needs to be in a shot. Direction is key, and so is the writing, but I am more confident in a competent director than I am in a subjective script where comedy is at the center.

    3. The ladies. Since this seems to be a screwball comedy of a HOT DOG nature it is only fitting that you have women that are so easy on the eyes you have at least one who works in porn. If I was thirteen and saw this trailer, I would want to see it for the hoochie action alone especially when one of them, exasperated, makes the comment to, “caress my cl$% with sandpaper.” Classless and vulgar; nice touch. Also, the lingerie-clad woman who was prone on the pool table getting a good rodgering before some mofo breaks up the party with a shotgun? A little sex and violence makes a great combo. It definitely hits the target demographic on the mark.

    There are some definite things that can be done to make this a better trailer but there are already good enough elements here that at least save it from being a total disaster. If it ditches the lo-fi sensibility that seems to be pervading the trailer this could do nothing more than help this movie’s chances of success.

    APPLESEED (2004)

    Director: Shinji Aramaki
    Cast: Ai Kobayashi, Jûrôta Kosugi, Yuki Matsuoka
    Release: Japan, April 17th
    Synopsis: Officer Deunan Knute and her cyborg partner Briaros Hecatonchires must prevent terrorists from gaining control of the Olympus city computer and causing massive chaos. As they fight to stop the terrorists and preserve their society, the question of who is actually in the right–their society, or the “terrorists”–continues to arise.

    View Trailer:
    * Large (Windows Media)
    * Medium (Windows Media)
    * Small (Windows Media)

    Progonosis: Positive.

    For all those in the wings decrying the death of traditional animation, you need to have a ball gag shoved between your zippered teeth long enough for you to see how the Japanese are deaf to every word of it.

    Again, I almost believed the hype. I almost did. Especially with the high class, fiscal failures of recent movies like TREASURE PLANET, and the weak, feeble features like HOME ON THE RANGE, one could make the case that traditional, animated storytelling is dead. However, stalwarts in the animation genre, men and women with an unyielding commitment to craftsmanship, like Hayao Miyazaki are showing how it’s done, and done well through films like SPIRITED AWAY and winning awards for doing it with class.

    I, personally, like my animation subtle, sharp and thoughtful rather than the flash/bang visual shotgun blast to the eyes fanaticism of a TRIGUN or MOBILE SUIT GUNDAM. While both thought-provoking and non-stop action fulfill their duties well in this regard there is something to be said how well Japanese animation is bridging both sides of that visual medium that many people are decrying as buried somewhere six feet under a fresh plot somewhere in Orlando, Florida.

    APPLESEED seems like a harmonious balance of both the sublime and all-out war with it erring, wonderfully, on the destruction side of things. The oversized eyes of most animated Japanese women is something I would take contention with, from a sociological point of view, but this trailer is too much fun to even dwell on that. From the word go, well, that’s what I’m thinking is being said as I don’t speak Japanese, the clip starts off with some generic contemporary rock n’ roll (oddly enough, all the music is English speaking) but it’s really the fluidity of the movie’s protagonist, Deunan Knute, as she moves between gunfire and runs with a weight that feels oddly natural. Most times in animation, domestically speaking, the characters don’t seem to adhere to basic laws of physics. Their style of movement, if you watch ALADDIN, SINBAD, et al., is almost ethereal and light. Here, there’s some real punch with every step. Watch the first ten seconds and you’ll see what I mean as Deunan comes out of a slo-mo flip over as she goes over a baddie. Not perfect, but it is better than what’s usually offered in the hybrid genre of computer assisted animation blended with traditional methods. The result just has to be seen.

    The direction, as well, is something that I almost, well, do, take umbrage with when I see it appear on most animated movies’ credits. Most times it seems if the director could simply say, “Ok. What I want you to do here is just keep everyone in the frame and keep doing that for the next ninety minutes. Unless, of course, someone doesn’t belong then you can just leave them out of the shot.” With this trailer, there are great perspectives and the director is trying hard to really capture an action movie here without giving any acknowledgement to the fact it is an animated feature. This is a movie with people and some of the vantage points that are chosen (watch the part where Knute takes a flying leap off a building).

    As all things are subjective, so too I realize this is a trailer that very well could be something people just don’t like or just say “meh” with disinterest after looking at it. For those in the know and like animation I would be more apt to believe a “meh” coming from them than I would from someone simply trolling, looking for a sequel to BROTHER BEAR. While Shinji Aramaki is only directing the movie, and it was a team of animators who really were the workhorses bringing this all to life it is amazing how well traditional and computer aided comes together here for a wondrous synergy of eye popping proportions.

    BAADASSSSS (2004)

    Director: Mario Van Peebles
    Cast: Mario Van Peebles, Joy Bryant, T.K. Carter, Terry Crews, Ossie Davis, David Alan Grier, Nia Long, Paul Rodriguez, Saul Rubinek, Vincent Schiavelli, Adam West, John Singleton
    Release: May 28, 2004 (limited)
    Synopsis: Mario Van Peebles, Melvin Van Peebles’ son, directs an honest and revealing portrait of his pioneering father. Following in his dad’s footsteps, and documenting his exceptional journey towards political defiance through cinema, Mario directs and stars as Melvin in BAADASSSSS!, based on the book Sweet Sweetback’s Baadasssss Song written by his father right after making SWEETBACK. The book went onto become a best seller, has been translated into several languages and is now a standard in university film classes.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (QuickTime)
    * Medium (QuickTime)
    * Large (Windows Media)

    Progonosis: Positive.

    This trailer has a funky sheen dripping from it in a way that I haven’t seen since, well, ever. As noted from Blaxploitation.com, a great resource on more of the background of a film like this, it was Melvin Van Peebles, Mario’s dad, who is credited for setting off the chain of films that would be known for producing flicks that had, “the most innovative music, if not plot” and, “were the black alternative to…mainstream offerings. Now known as “blaxploitation” films, they satisfied the demand from inner-city audiences for movies made by and for blacks.” Obviously, these kinds of movies had long term repercussions in the way films were made throughout the seventies as they were aimed at black moviegoers.

    Since many, like myself, weren’t around for this renaissance of filmmaking and movie going around that time, I had to deal with having the leftovers, the scraps, if you will, of these films. However, those two were responsible for producing some of the best talent out there today: NEW JACK CITY and I’M GONNA GIT YOU SUCKA. NEW JACK stands out as one I go back to regularly, not only for its content, but because it is in my top ten trailers of all time. It was a film that had Mario, in one of his best roles ever, Wesley Snipes, Ice-T, Judd Nelson (who knew he would be so good?), Chris Rock, and it was notable as it was actually helped by an addictive soundtrack, one of the markings of any great blaxpoitation film. So, how does this all pertain to the trailer? This film, BAADASSSSS!, is a homage not only to Mario’s pioneer father, but he is playing his father as he retraces his dad’s steps in starting a revolution in moviemaking and how all the elements that worked over ten years ago to make a crime film worked over thirty years ago that ignited some great artists.

    The first thing you notice about the trailer (and the site if you visit it) is the music, a little funk, and it assists the movie, tonally, in such a way that it puts to shame many other films that look to whore the soundtrack of blink-and-you’ll-miss-them bands on their own soundtrack. A couple of contentions I would take as the trailer rolls on is that while I am a big supporter of those afflicted with ADD and deserve to have their views disseminated in the public eye it does not mean, however, I have to be subjected to it in my trailers. As soon as I get comfortable with a little exposition about what this story is about I am yanked and then pulled into different visual directions. Yes, I understand what’s happening because I read a synopsis but think of the people who are coming to this fresh off the farm. Take some pills. Please. The other issue I have are the words that are interposed on the screen between what the filmmakers feel are moments of necessitude, which I can understand with all the quick cutting going on, but it’s the same thing here as what is going on in the trailer for THE LAST SHOT; great trailer, with awful lettering. You would think some people would be inspired by the company that did the opening work for PANIC ROOM, but it’s a small fault as the rest of the trailer really shines.

    Watching Mario Van Peebles work I am amazed I haven’t seen more of this guy around. Sure, he’s done a lot of low visibility work as of late, read here: television and small movie roles, but the man still is a marvel to watch. He’s charismatic, compelling and there’s a genuine believability that comes across as he does his thing throughout this trailer. From the pieces that show the nuts and bolts of getting his film, Melvin Van Peebles film, personally financed, made and what kind of resistance he encounters in the process. There’s a dash of humor, some sensuality, and a whole lot of heart. With other trailers I would almost call what Mario does in this trailer, in technical verbiage, as being a camera hog but he has different faces and moods that change throughout the couple of minutes this trailer runs. With great a visual style and, again, shifting musical tempos the trailer never lags and it’s a full sprint from start to finish.

    With the addition of Nia Long, Paul Rodriguez, David Alan Grier, John Singleton, and even, huh?, Adam West, this movie is packed. Since this film is under the Sony Pictures Classics imprint it is unlikely that this film will be playing everywhere which is a shame as it looks completely accessible. From what informational pieces I picked up in the trailer I can understand why a lot of theater owners probably won’t be showing it; somewhere in my mind a Public Enemy song still rings with clarity.

    THE CORPORATION (2004)

    Director: Jennifer Abbott, Mark Achbar
    Cast: Jane Akre, Ray Anderson, Maude Barlow, Chris Barrett, Noam Chomsky, Peter Drucker, Samuel Epstein, Milton Freidman, Naomi Klein, Luke McCabe, Mikela J. Mikael, Robert Monks, Michael Moore, Vandana Shiva, Steve Wilson
    Release: Limted Release starting June 4th.
    Synopsis: One hundred and fifty years ago, the corporation was a relatively insignificant entity. Today, it is a vivid, dramatic and pervasive presence in all our lives. Like the Church, the Monarchy and the Communist Party in other times and places, the corporation is today’s dominant institution. But history humbles dominant institutions. All have been crushed, belittled or absorbed into some new order. The corporation is unlikely to be the first to defy history. In this complex and highly entertaining documentary, Mark Achbar, co-director of the influential and inventive MANUFACTURING CONSENT: NOAM CHOMSKY AND THE MEDIA, teams up with co-director Jennifer Abbott and writer Joel Bakan to examine the far-reaching repercussions of the corporation’s increasing preeminence. Based on Bakan’s book The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power, the film is a timely, critical inquiry that invites CEOs, whistle-blowers, brokers, gurus, spies, players, pawns and pundits on a graphic and engaging quest to reveal the 4corporation’s inner workings, curious history, controversial impacts and possible futures. Featuring illuminating interviews with Noam Chomsky, Michael Moore, Howard Zinn and many others, THE CORPORATION charts the spectacular rise of an institution aimed at achieving specific economic goals as it also recounts victories against this apparently invincible force.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Positive.

    Yes, it’s like BOWLING FOR COLUMBINE. With that out of our system, this trailer previews what I feel will be a very evocative, if not far left-wing, look at modern corporations.

    “What is a corporation?” One thing that informs my own viewing of this trailer is my own digestion of the works “Gain” by Richard Powers, “Culture Jam” by Kalle Lash, and even the documentary “Merchants of Cool” that aired on PBS’ Frontline. If taken as a whole these works piece together a very broad picture of how the modern corporation exists, how it gives us a bulk of our popular culture and how it consumes hours of our lives in our pursuit of happiness. Again, some of it is far-leftie claptrap but it is riveting nonetheless. This documentary seems to synthesize all these things, aided in part by my main man sam Noam Chomsky, no stranger to a little controversy, Michael Moore, like you didn’t see that one coming, and other cultural, political and economic figureheads.

    The trailer is well paced and definitely has me excited to see the whole thing. It starts off with some old file footage of some old factories from a black and white era and it interposes these images with contemporary visages of today’s economic powerhouses whilst social commentators start chipping away at what would otherwise be a nice, gingerly stroll down history lane on A&E.

    “There are companies that make our lives better; the problem comes in the profit motivation.”

    From the set-up that this isn’t a documentary playing with kid gloves, we get right into the thick of the allegations of unscrupulous commercial tactics used by the likes of Nike and Liz Claiborne. The trailer shows, and exploits the visage of, the third world countries and people where sweatshop conditions, and wages, is the way business is done on a daily basis; a global basis. From there it is the demanding consumer that is then spotlighted as one of the reasons why the cycle of cheap goods equates to the need for cheap labor.

    “You can manipulate consumers. Is it ethical? I don’t know, but our rule is to move products.”

    The environment, our greed, society, future of what’s to come for us and the global economy takes up the last quarter of the trailer but it’s all very provocative and packed with some great sound bites to gnash on while pondering the movies essential ethos: What is the modern day corporation, how does it affect my life and am I happy to be a good consumer of it all?

    The trailer raises good questions, is a perfect ad for exactly the kind of movie it is going to be, and doesn’t shy away from using some good money shots to get the job done. Now, that being said, I am sure everyone could see the flick as the kind of “hippy” extremist rhetoric indicative of those hooligans that disturbed the lovely G7 meetings and crashed the window of your favorite Starbucks. Without question you would be right; however, what should be noted here is that keeping with the conglomerated stranglehold that media monoliths have, and that most news outlets are simply directed by shareholder concerns (read here: News Corp, Time Warner, et al.), this is the kind of long, hard look at corporations that would be at least worth a listen if nothing else.

    April 23, 2004

    Trailer Park: Demme More?

    Filed under: Columns,Trailer Park — admin @ 2:32 am

    E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES

    By Christopher Stipp

    April 23, 2004

    DEMME MORE?

    Thank you to everyone who wrote to tell me that Ted and Jonathan Demme are not brothers but, in fact, uncle and nephew. I could be cold-hearted and tell you all that the point is moot because of Ted’s demise but I am much happier to just say thank you to a readership who kept me on my toes. I’m thinking I am going to do it more often just so I know you’re out there. It was like accidentally turning on my headlight glasses from PEE-WEE’S BIG ADVENTURE and seeing scores of you there. It was great to hear everyone correct me on my mistake (do you think I’ll forget that fact again or be able to look at my copies of THE REF or SILENCE OF THE LAMBS without thinking of this?) but since it’s really the only time when I hear from a gaggle of you people I may do it soon, should loneliness hit in the coming weeks.

    Now, some really great trailers broke this week and Spielberg’s TERMINAL was not one of them. What a disappointment. The man who gave MINORITY REPORT and CATCH ME IF YOU CAN to the world within six months of each other produced a big goose egg if the trailer is to be believed. No matter, though, as things can change and sometimes trailers can be deceptive; that’s what I keep telling myself as I rock myself to sleep, anyway.

    This week I decided to highlight IMMORTEL as my favorite clip of the week. I had seen this one before a few weeks ago and I found myself coming back to the thing again and again just to look at it. I was unsure of what the hell was going on, and I’m still a little hazy, but it looks just spectacular on the small screen and can only imagine what it would be like to see this thing splattered on a big one. You will either think it looks really involved and intricate with a lot of imagery and symbolism or believe it’s the turd of Satan and should be thusly flushed into cinematic obscurity. Que sera sera.

    SUPER SIZE ME (2004)

    Director: Morgan Spurlock
    Cast: Morgan Spurlock, Dr. Daryl Isaacs
    Release: May 7, 2004
    Synopsis: Why are Americans so fat? Find out in SUPER SIZE ME, a tongue in-cheek – and burger-in-hand look at the legal, financial and physical costs of America’s hunger for fast food. Ominously, 37% of American children and adolescents are carrying too much fat and two out of every three adults are overweight or obese. Is it our fault for lacking self-control, or are the fast-food corporations to blame? Filmmaker Morgan Spurlock hit the road and interviewed experts in 20 U.S. cities, including Houston, the “Fattest City in America.” From Surgeon Generals to gym teachers, cooks to kids, lawmakers to legislators, these authorities shared their research, opinions and “gut feelings” on our ever-expanding girth. During the journey, Spurlock also put his own body on the line, living on nothing but McDonald’s for an entire month with three simple rules:1) No options: he could only eat what was available over the counter (water included!)
    2) No super-sizing unless offered
    3) No excuses: he had to eat every item on the menu at least once.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (QuickTime)
    * Medium (QuickTime)
    * Large (QuickTime)
    * Small (Windows Media, RealPlayer)

    Progonosis: Positive.

    If there were a key element that makes a great documentary, cultural relevance would have to be one of them.

    In the past couple of years, there was the documentary called WINGED MIGRATION which was a great movie about birds but, in that same year, you also had BOWLING FOR COLUMBINE opening, which one created a little more “buzz” (a despicable verb, I know.). There was something about the pokes and jabs it took that revealed something about our culture that riled many people into action regardless if they had seen the film or not. It essentially created a topic of conversation, started dialogues, and that is the essence of what SUPER SIZE ME could possibly do if it lays out its cards carefully and honestly.

    The JAWS-like music in the beginning of the trailer would be slightly pedantic if it weren’t for the punctuating sound of Spurlock crushing down upon a Mickey D’s sandwich with the juicy insides providing a subtle exclamation mark at the end; it encapsulates the theme of the documentary perfectly without clubbing people over the head in a blizzard of information. From there the set-up nearly writes itself.

    It does have the obligatory award mention, which I normally think is unnecessary if coming from someone already well-established, before it launches into the rest of the trailer, but for a documentary like this it can only help the film as the full length early reviews have already been very kind.

    As you watch the trailer, though, one gets the sense that here was a young filmmaker who had a great idea for a documentary and took a chance to do it on his own. He had no distribution, no studio backing, but he creates something very enveloping and, now, timely. No matter that there is now a very public push by the golden arches to offer healthy alternatives to the kind of crap Spurlock is shown consuming because the damage has already been done. His use of dietary charts, clips of overweight individuals, and words of nutritional caution from a doctor show the reverberations of a having society of gluttons. The trailer almost shows Spurlock to be having too much fun being in front of the camera but that is a tiny annoyance compared to the possibility of where things could go in this movie.

    As quick as the trailer begins, it ends with an almost-vomiting Spurlock. An almost-heave will always get a vote from me and it ties up very succinctly. The trailer music is a very catchy ditty and I found myself singing the refrain long after it was over. Hopefully, as this is really classified as an “arty” release, you’ll be able to catch it somewhere close when it opens in a few weeks. Your gut may very well depend on it.

    FAVORS (2004)

    Director: Gary King
    Cast: Tom Biagini, Brian Rivera, Ben Ortega, Jeremy Koerner, Angelina Cheng
    Release: March 2004
    Synopsis: In just one morning, the lives of two friends, Ricky and Piaroni, will take significantly separate paths. While waiting to meet a friend, they instead encounter a stranger named Willie. From that point on, the two friends must make certain choices that will affect the lives of everyone around them.

    View Trailer:
    * Low and High Resolution (QuickTime)

    Progonosis: Positive.

    What I like most about noir crime thrillers are their ability to envision a world that I do not inhabit yet make me believe I can relate to.

    There are many that get it right (RESERVIOR DOGS, THE USUAL SUSPECTS, even LA CONFIDENTIAL) and scores that fail miserably to make a notch in the collective rawhide belt in the canon of great works of this genre. What there is to see in this trailer for FAVORS is a little bit of suspense, a hint of danger, and a good, sustainable mood throughout. Much of the praise should fall on Biagini who, in a matter of a minute, immediately makes me believe that danger is afoot.

    The supporting actors that are showcased are given slight focus but the majority of time in this trailer rests mostly with the protagonist. He’s good looking, exudes some genuine charisma, and appears to be a guy everyone would want to either revile or root for. What else is of some interest here is some notable camera work and cinematography. There are thick blacks, very sharp whites and, combined, they create a believable landscape for these players.

    Now, while that is all well and good there are some points of contention I have. First, what is with the freeform flute/instrumentation music that circulates in the background? It took away from the quick pace, sharp camera shots and distracted me from really feeling the moments that were occurring on the screen. Second, does the whole movie take place in a parking garage? From the trailer you would almost be hard-pressed to disagree. Yeah, there is some people running down a bright alley and there is a little boom-boom going on with a nice looking lady but, damn, everything else looks like it was either shot at midnight or we’re dealing with cave dwellers with photophobia. Even though, yes, I can read the synopsis I am simply looking out for the illiterate faction of the readership when I say that there is a little ambiguity when it comes to breaking down the story in the trailer. I am still not really sure who is good, who is bad and if the protagonist here isn’t really some kind of anti-hero. I have a good idea what’s going on but a viewer should feel they have a handle on the story after everything is over. I may just be a vapid idiot so take that for what it’s worth.

    With that all said, apart from those three quibbles, this is a trailer that excites me on a level that makes me believe noir will never leave the cinematic lexicon. I would gladly pay the money to see this film and I’ll tell you why: the trailer doesn’t insult me, it seeks to create something original in its presentation and the filmmaker doesn’t feel he has to blow his load by showing off all the movie tricks in his basket to sell me on his film. It’s better to be ballsy than it is to be insidious when trying to pimp a project. I appreciate the respect that’s given to me as a viewer and that speaks volumes even when I still don’t really know what the hell is going on with this film.

    NAPOLEON DYNAMITE (2004)

    Director: Jared Hess
    Cast: Jon Heder, Jon Gries, Aaron Ruell, Efren Ramirez, Tina Majorino, Haylie Duff, Sandy Martin
    Release: June 11, 2004
    Synopsis: From Preston, Idaho comes Napoleon Dynamite (Jon Heder), a new kind of hero complete with a tight red ‘fro, some sweet moon boots, and skills that can’t be topped. Napoleon lives with his Grandma (Sandy Martin) and his 30-year-old, unemployed brother Kip (Aaron Ruell), who spends his days looking for love in internet chat rooms. When Grandma hits the road on her quad runner, Napoleon and Kip’s meddling Uncle Rico (Jon Gries) comes to town to stay with them and ruin their lives. Napoleon is left to his own devices to impress the chicks at school and help his new best friend Pedro (Efren Ramirez) win the election for Student Body President against the stuck-up Summer Wheatley (Haylie Duff); all the while making sure to feed Grandma’s pet llama Tina, and avoiding association with Uncle Rico and the herbal breast enhancers he sells door to door. Napoleon and Pedro put their skills and knowledge of piñatas, cows and drawing to good use, but it is a surprise talent that leads the two to triumph in the end.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (QuickTime)

    Progonosis: Positive.

    I’m already dismayed by some who have suggested, annoyingly, that this movie falls too close to the Wes Anderson camp and, therefore, ergo, it must be a rip-off.

    We should be so lucky, you twitish ponces.

    Although watching this trailer you could see elements of Anderson’s style, albeit in very subtle ways, Wes had no part in making this film, no part in post, no part in marketing, and no part in hustling this thing at film festivals. I can think of worse clones right off the top my head, Brett Ratner being an orange DayGlo neon example for one, and this is great trailer that exudes the kind of execution that some filmmakers should be having when making their own film. What you have here is a genuine article of pure entertainment; at least that’s what the trailer conveys, and it does it beautifully.

    What’s amazing about this trailer is that there isn’t one famous name I can point to yet I am fascinated and intrigued by everyone who shows up on the screen. From the start I am pulled in by Heder’s onscreen persona of Napoleon Dynamite. His voice, in all its monotone hilarity, is a delightful complement to his lankiness as the quintessential, almost emblematic of the species in general, nerd. Quite possibly this film could be a prequel to REVENGE OF THE NERDS. Heder is a near twin of Timothy Busfield’s Poindexter (how Busfield, Edwards and Goodman managed to have sustainable careers after that film is beyond my ken but god love “˜em for doing it.) and it is every bit as funny to see this character move about on the screen.

    After the character is set up what follows is nice Eighties ditty, “Candy” by Bow Wow Wow, that carries a pitch perfect tone through the rest of the trailer and allows the viewer simply to enjoy what follows. We get Napoleon getting shoved into a locker for being a social outcast (that bit never gets old), Napoleon trying to jump a shoddily constructed ramp with a dirt bike and getting his nuts slammed in the process (that bit really never gets old), and him, all alone, going mano y mano with a tetherball. Such is the life of a nerd and it’s portrayed well here.

    While a movie about a nerd is nothing new, the construction of this film and the way it presents itself show something much more than this just being a movie aimed at those who were marginalized as youths. There is a fascination here with Napoleon, not so much an admiration, and that’s what sets this film apart. He is most definitely a geek with an eclectic set of people who inhabit the world with him. Coupled with the fact that the film has the sheen of Payne’s ELECTION, a great teen movie that wasn’t, it is not very hard to see why this film was snatched up when others were able to see it in its entirety.

    TERMINAL (2004)

    Director: Steven Spielberg
    Cast: Tom Hanks, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Stanley Tucci, Chi McBride, Diego Luna, Barry “Shabaka” Henley, Kumar Pallana, Zoë Saldana, Eddie Jones, Jude Ciccolella
    Release: June 18, 2004
    Synopsis: “The Terminal” tells the story of Viktor Navorski (Tom Hanks), a visitor to New York from Eastern Europe, whose homeland erupts in a fiery coup while he is in the air en route to America. Stranded at Kennedy Airport with a passport from nowhere, he is unauthorized to actually enter the United States and must improvise his days and nights in the terminal’s international transit lounge until the war at home is over. As the weeks and months stretch on, Viktor finds the compressed universe of the terminal to be a richly complex world of absurdity, generosity, ambition, amusement, status, serendipity and even romance with a beautiful flight attendant named Amelia (Catherine Zeta-Jones). But Viktor has long worn out his welcome with airport official Frank Dixon (Stanley Tucci), who considers him a bureaucratic glitch, a problem he cannot control but wants desperately to erase.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (QuickTime)
    * Medium (QuickTime)
    * Large (Windows Media)

    Progonosis: Negative.

    I wish I could say that this movie at least looks entertaining enough for a matinee but it doesn’t even rate at that level.

    I almost feel like I have to be an apologist about it but why, really, when this looks like a miserable dramedy with all the punch strength of a Glass Joe uppercut?

    It starts off interestingly enough, I give it that. The one thing I can say positively is that it has an interesting way of introducing the players of this film; the glorified tote board of arriving/departing flights is a subtle touch that I really liked and thought it was creative. Stanley Tucci, who will always be a rock solid second banana in my movie bible, sets the premise up effectively without the trailer resorting to a faceless voiceover. While all his happens a lovely violin plays, reminiscent of CATCH ME IF YOU CAN and possibly the same music played in Zeta-Jones’ INTOLERABLE CRUELTY trailer, and to that point everything is going by the trailer guide book. That is, until, Tom Hanks opens his mouth.

    I am not sure if a sustained assault of the Eastern bloc accent he dribbles out is a good thing but I was nowhere near being convinced that I was looking at a foreigner stuck in an airport. It’s Tom Hanks with a funny accent. It’s about this moment when the East meets West clips come in (“Hey, lookey here, he’s in a bathrobe! Hey, he’s looking into a security camera like he’s never seen one! Hey, he’s shaving in an airport toilet like it’s his bathroom. That Hanks is such a card, I tell ya.”) and the so not-believable it-can’t-even-be-sold-for-a-trailer’s-worth-of-time attraction between Hanks and Zeta-Jones.

    To compound things, the second set of music that plays in the background? The rendition of “Leaving on a Jet Plane” is quite possibly some of the most depressing choices for music I’ve heard yet for a trailer. Is Tom Hanks going to die in a flaming crash by the end? If the answer is no, then damn, change it. If I’m not sold on Hanks’ character, which I’m not, and Zeta-Jones is doing nothing in this thing but looking my-t-fine, which she is, then something about the pacing or tone of this thing needs some retooling.

    Not counting AMISTAD, and who would at this point, I have yet to be disappointed with a Spielberg work since 1991’s HOOK, which I could only assume must have been the result of heavy drinking, a phone, and what he thought would be a funny prank call to a studio exec. If this ends the successful streak then so be it. Maybe it will be a good enough shock to the nards that he’ll try a little harder next time and he’ll come to the realization that Indiana Jones needs to have a new adventure before Harrison is bullwhipping baddies in the Alzheimer’s ward.

    I would have more to say had this trailer not left me with such a sense of disbelief. The feeling still lingers and yet I can see either this becomes another Hanks disaster, like LADYKILLERS, or gets embraced by folks who don’t mind a shoddy sounding accent and a thin premise that, so far, would only really appeal to women looking for any antidote for the summer blockbusters.

    IMMORTEL (AD VITAM) (2004)

    Director: Enki Bilal
    Cast: Linda Hardy, Thomas Kretschmann, Charlotte Rampling, Frédéric Pierrot, Thomas M. Pollard, Yann Collette
    Release: France, March 24th
    Synopsis: New York 2095. In a strange pyramid floating in the sky, the gods of ancient Egypt are judging Horus. In the city, a young women with blue hair and tears is arrested, but she has a secret power, even to herself.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (QuickTime)
    * Large (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Positive.

    I have about as much handle on the things going on in this trailer as I do understanding why I drool incessantly on my pillow at night.

    I could tell you what I think is going on here (transformation, rebirth, the exploration of life itself and the many facets of death) but I am still not sure myself that I would be right. Visually speaking, this movie looks like the inbreeded result of mashing together styles from BLADE RUNNER, MINORITY REPORT, THE FIFTH ELEMENT and a good sampling of METROPOLIS. There is also here a conjoining of live action, animation and the trailer is just wonderful to watch simply on an eye candy level.

    The story, though, gets a little murky after you get the gist that, essentially, an Egyptian like deity is allowed to roam New York, circa 2095, for seven days before having his immortality taken away. That’s what I know and that’s all I know. What I can cobble together after this, and looking at the trailer, is that there is some possession of human bodies, guns, explosions, a whole lot of white light, nudity (Booyah!), a tagline that says something about being able to procreate with gods (I was too busy with the nudity to listen that intently) and I am happy to report that the future is still misogynistic as it values beautiful, skinny women with great looking teeth.

    I wouldn’t normally include a trailer like this simply based on visual appeal but just watching this thing is pleasure enough to at prompt me to feel that I need to at least check out what the rest of this film is like. Could it be effect heavy and topple over on its pretension? Quite possibly yes, but after so many movies have a warped and uninteresting view of the future (THE FIFTH ELEMENT being a large violator of this notion) there is a great tradition of films that look ahead and successfully create an entire world based on the possibility of fact and fiction. It’s inspiring to see someone pour themselves into a vision and bring it to fruition. The final execution of those things may not be perfect but it definitely has a style all its own.

    I wish there was some possibility of the film making its way here to see how Americans would respond to this kind of fare but since the director has really only ever worked in France, and because there isn’t a major international star attached (where’s Monica Bellucci when you need her?), this picture has little hope of ever making its way into the fifty screen cineplex anytime soon.

    April 16, 2004

    Trailer Park: Spider-Man 2

    Filed under: Columns,Trailer Park — admin @ 2:33 am

    E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES

    By Christopher Stipp

    April 16th, 2004

    SPIDER-MAN 2

    I’m issuing a Mea Culpa here: I am incredibly and unabashedly biased towards the new SPIDER-MAN 2 film. As you can see by the length of the review I felt a slight leaning towards the positive ends of things. I believe it has everything going for it and in these times of vapid and hollow summer blockbusters this may actually have something riveting enough to classify as a comic book movie with heart. But you can read all of that at the bottom of the page.

    There were some great debuts this week and in case you missed a couple of key ones, I’ve included them here. Since I’m pounding this out on an IBM 386 I will keep my extraneous comments here to a minimum this week (glorious cheers from the peanut gallery) and let you pick and choose at will. If you happen to disagree with anything I have to say please shoot me an email so I can tell you how wrong your opinion is. I love hearing from the masses and you guys, have some great, and opinionated, things to say.

    Also, it’s been a great pleasure to see the indie guys here passing along their trailers for their obscure films. I’ve talked about a few so far that I feel are actually worth checking out and I want you to see them too and let me know what you think. If you feel I’m being too lenient with some of the up-and-comers let me know. After all, some of you probably have your own project that needs some attention and I’m more than happy to share some of the space with the big budget monoliths that run through here on a weekly basis.

    THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE (2004)

    Director: Jonathan Demme
    Cast: Denzel Washington, Meryl Streep, Liev Schreiber, Jon Voight, Kimberly Elise, Jeffrey Wright, Ted Levine
    Release: July 30, 2004
    Synopsis: A psychological thriller, “The Manchurian Candidate” stars Denzel Washington as Army Major Bennett Marco, a career soldier who grows suspicious about his experience in Desert Storm after Squad Sergeant Raymond Shaw (Liev Schreiber), son of the powerful Senator Eleanor Shaw (Meryl Streep), becomes a candidate for Vice President.

    View Trailer:
    * Various (Windows Media, Real Player, QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Positive.

    Denzel, where have you been?

    I’ve seen him in only two upcoming films since last year’s OUT OF TIME, but his year’s MAN ON FIRE and MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE both have to be on my year’s Must See list if nothing else. What occurs to me, as I see this trailer again and again is how much actors like him are needed in the modern cinematic landscape. The man has simply yet to sell his soul to the dollar devil. Unlike some other has-beens who feel it was much better to sacrifice public opinion than it was to stay kind of true to something that may or may not have social or artistic purpose it is with wonderful wonderment to see an actor like Denzel try things not simply based on how much it may or may not rake in at the box office. Sure, he could certainly do an Amblin project that rapes another Geisel’s classic but he seems to have a head for projects that precludes him from ever entertaining pap like that. And good for him. This update on the 60’s classic looks to just further his dominance as an A-lister. Now, withheld for a longer time than I have been on this earth by ol’ Blue Eyes himself, the original incarnation of this film dealt with soldiers coming back from the Korean War brainwashed by enemy combatants. Now, it’s the Gulf War and everything else is being replaced and updated by the heavies that have decided to give this a go.

    In the opening scenes, Liev Schreiber is addressing the camera by saying how much he knows “America has to fear today” and that, “freedom from fear is not negotiable.” I like the breaking of the 3rd wall by addressing the audience directly. It’s a great device that reminds me of some of the more eerie moments of THEY LIVE and it works here. The opening orchestral score isn’t distracting, annoying or overtly lame and the words that flash on the screen that tell me “a candidate is running” in-between the scenes actually heighten my anticipation for what follows.

    We get a look of some experiments going on (creepy needle thingies, quick camera shots of people moving about, small tattoos on the faces of nameless subjects which is reminiscent of the KAIDAN box cover and a monkey which is always a fun detail) and then a calm speaking Denzel who is talking to Army brass about what strange things have been happening to him. We get introduced to Meryl and the rest of the zoo crew who are out to discredit Denzel as he fights to understand what it was that happened to him. Of course, as the trailer runs toward the finish line we get to see the scroll that reminds us all who it is that directed this thing, how many Academy Award winners are starring in the thing, how much money actually went towards buying trailers to house all that star power, etc.

    What I thought was a nice touch, though, is the use of the Darth Vader breathing machine. By employing the effect here, if the first two were any indication, it actually gets me excited to see the film and not dreading the suck factor that is sure to follow.

    The wildcard factor here, though, is how well the remaining Demme can come correct with this film. It was hard for me to keep these guys separate as I am a huge fan of the REF, BEAUTIFUL GIRLS, BLOW, DENIS LEARY: LOCK N’ LOAD, all films done by the other Demme. The more Oscar attentive one has done SILENCE OF THE LAMBS, PHILIDELPHIA, and SWING SHIFT, true, but he is also responsible for the TRUTH ABOUT CHARLIE, MARRIED TO THE MOB, SOMEHTING WILD, and a women’s prison movie called CAGED HEAT. Yeah, I’ve done things I’m not proud of either but, damn, CAGED HEAT?

    ON THE FRINGE (2004)

    Director: Jeff Palmer
    Cast: Dan Clay, Jerry Howe, Michael Walsh, Matt Magennis, Bill Humphreys, Jeff Fritz, Debra Martuscello Wiley, Jewel Davis, Shawn Crapo, Dan Crane
    Release: Currently looking for distribution
    Synopsis: Upon returning home from a journey across the states, Kurt Calloway’s soul-searching is about to begin. Back to resolve issues surrounding his mother’s death, Kurt hits the not-so-familiar streets of his hometown where he befriends Dwayne, a benevolent comrade of the town misfits. Over a game of cards, Kurt meets Eddie, a deadbeat dad hiding from gambling debts, and Seamus, an antisocial pack rat withdrawn from the world around him. Together, the four characters form a powerful relationship that takes them from the fringes of society into the heart of self-discovery. In doing so, Kurt learns to cope with his loss through the lives of those around him.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Positive.

    Sometimes you need to, have to, give it up for the little guy.

    When I see the BROTHERS MCMULLEN I am reminded of how much I thought of Edward Burns. He was great filmmaker and writer; one of the freshest voices, bar none, that came out of the East coast in the mid nineties. I was a fan of his Bostonian matter-of-factness and was happy that out of the all the young directors that were using their voice to focus on their heritage and where they came from (Spike Lee and John Singleton come to mind real quick) this was going to be someone to explore the Irish American experience as it is in contemporary times.

    What I got was an individual who now has more acting credits than he does writing or directing ones. I’m not whining or pointing fingers yelling “fraud!” but it’s just a disappointment. I bring this up because I see some very nice potential in the makers of ON THE FRINGE. Since there’s really nothing I can do to compare it to, any past work that I can relate to what I am talking about, I just have to take the clinical approach and break it down, scene by scene.

    “What, three years ain’t enough time for you to wander around and get over losin’ ma?”

    We get a shot of our protagonist, a youngish clone of Nicholas Sadler, aka the twit you wanted to pummel from A SCENT OF A WOMAN, hair split down the middle, as he talks to someone, a family member perhaps, sitting in a prison. Obviously, there are some issues involved of a personal nature and it’s nice to be thrust straight into drama. We get some deeply brooding music, followed by a pleasing snippet of a bike parked on a hill with a wonderfully blue sky in the background. I bring this piece of minutiae up as the composition and use of natural light is a quick moment of inspiration.

    “Sweeping it under the rug does not make things any easier.”

    Having good looking ladies deliver lines does not hurt a fetal project of this size. You need some lookers, sometimes, to get someone to notice and I am glad this card is played. It’s the nature of the beast. Either you pay to play or you’re able to get things done on the integrity of the project. You can have both feet in both camps and this trailer does both.

    What does present an issue for me is that the story progresses to the point where I am following everything just fine (protagonist calls in some favors for a questionable individual, individual finds out, things get weird) but then I am presented with people I haven’t been introduced to or know how they fit into the overall schematic of things. I get a guy with a gun, some hands go in the air, I see some puss blubbering like a woman, and I see some old, crotchety man with a shotgun and some woman telling said crotchety man to put the heater down as our protagonist protests the codgers claim that he’s on drugs. It’s very schizophrenic. If you’re an ADD sufferer life will be good, but for me it was a little confusing. No matter, though, as I get another well shot scene of a person running against a deeply blue sky and towards a very large, and twiggy, tree.

    “Every city has a story. Some of fate, some of glory.”

    There are some great uses of natural environments here. Watch the trailer and pay attention to how the outdoor works in the film’s favor. Usually used simply as a default function, the fall colors of leaves, the costuming of the actors, and the feeling of warmth it all conveys brings things to a pleasing conclusion as the trailer ends with a crane shot that takes us above a leafy tree, losing its fingers as the trailer leaves us wanting to know what happened in-between.

    THE RINGER (2004)

    Director: Barry W. Blaustein
    Cast: Johnny Knoxville, Katherine Heigl, Brian Cox
    Release: November 5, 2004
    Synopsis: Desperate for cash to help a friend in need and pay off his smarmy uncle’s gambling debts, Steve Barker sinks to an all time low…he attempts to fix the Special Olympics by pretending to be a person with intellectual disabilities. But he is completely out-classed by his fellow Olympians, who are not only superior athletes, they’re also wiser in the ways of the world. Several of his fellow competitors immediately spot Steve as a fraud, but because they too would like to see the fall of Jimmy, the snooty reigning champion, they join forces to help THE RINGER win. Together they train Steve to become a better athlete and, most importantly, a better man.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Positive.

    Johnny Knoxville is already getting named more often in this column than some of those who have been hard at work doing better things than he’ll ever be remembered for accomplishing. When I heard the premise of this film, I was all over it. I, unfortunately, have used a few short bus jokes as a reliable comedic crutch. It’s an easy jab and I have yet to have someone tell me that they were one of those kids. It’s not funny, some would say, but, please, relax. Much like monkeys playing with their poo I will always, like kryptonite, fall prey to easy amusement that the short bus evokes.

    The trailer starts off with Johnny in a confessional; starts out innocently enough and I wonder, quickly, if I’m seeing the right one. As it continues to go on, Knoxville opens his mouth: “I’ve been pretending to be mentally challenged so I can fix the Special Olympics. To make money off it.”

    Awesome, although, I can see where this is going. By the time the anticipated fist comes crashing through the other side of the confessional I applaud the bold use of the single shot of the trailer. It is only Johnny. There is no Brian Cox, who has seen some of the better sides of attention since his wonderful role in X2, and there are no other players showcased. Ballsy, but if you’re not showing me anything else this is the way to do it. The only other reason I included this trailer is the man who is credited as directing this thing was a scribe for Saturday Night Live from 1980-84, penned COMING TO AMERICA (Making it okay to use Sexual Chocolate again), BOOMERANG (Where I learned the importance of coordinating), and gave me a hopeless thought that Eddie Murphy could be funny again with THE NUTTY PROFESSOR. The writer, as well, impressed me with the short-lived-now-resurrected Family Guy series, so there is some shimmer of possibility here with might be. I can’t say for sure if the movie is even worth seeing but this trailer is very postmodern in its use of cleanliness and I feel just fine about it.

    DODGEBALL: A TRUE UNDERDOG STORY (2004)

    Director: Rawson Marshall Thurber
    Cast: Vince Vaughn, Ben Stiller, Christine Taylor, Jason Bateman, Brooke Burke, Stephen Root, Rip Torn
    Release: June 18, 2004
    Synopsis: A small local gym is threatened with extinction by a gleaming sports and fitness palace unless a group of social rejects can rise to victory in the ultimate dodge ball competition.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (QuickTime) * Medium (QuickTime)

    * Large (QuickTime)

    Prognosis: Negative.

    Could it be possible to have Ben Stiller just slow down a bit?

    Bill Hicks, if I ever were to name anyone in this world who has shaped and molded my worldview like Silly Putty, famously brings up a little film Sharon Stone and Michael Douglas did years ago. He eloquently calls it a heaping pile, a few times, and it embraces things wonderfully about how sad DODGEBALL makes me feel.

    “You know I saw this movie this year called last year called ‘Basic Instinct’. Okay now. Bill’s quick capsule review: Piece-of-S#$%. Okay now. Yeah, yeah, end of story by the way. Don’t get caught up in that fevered hype phony fu&%$#$ debate about that Piece-of-S#$% movie.”

    It opens up innocently enough. Some words come on the screen, the very worst kind of scroll that is used to utter disappointment, about how there are two rules to dodgeball: target the weak and only the strong survive. Lame. The crap bus gets rolling as some wag of a ref shouts out “dodgeball!” (Ooo…is that how every game is started?) and we get our first sound of a rubber ball careering of a player’s head.

    “Is it too sexist, and what about the movies, are they becoming too ddddd!. You’re, you’re just confused, you don’t get, you’ve forgotten how to judge correctly. Take a deep breath huuh, look at it again. ‘Oh! It’s a Piece-of-S#$%!”

    We’re introduced to Ben as a maniacal health-club owner of a gym called Globo-Gym. The first problem here, apart from the oddly limp sounding organization, is that Ben is playing another “character.” I like Ben. In fact, I probably spend more time enjoying his comedic work more than anyone else working today, but his character here is overtly annoying and, apart from Vince Vaughn playing his caustic self (a much more pleasing and enjoyable person here), offers no laughs. We learn quickly, like a lead pipe to your knees if you weren’t paying attention, that Vince’s buddies need to come up with $50,000 or Vince’s gym, a wonderfully local, little place will be swallowed by the big, bad, burly mega corporation that Ben owns. Wonderful.

    “Exactly, that’s all it is. Satan squatted, let out a loaf, they put a fu$%&#@ title on it, put it on a marquee, Satan’s s#$%, piece of s#$%, walk away.” Of course, the way the little guys seek to get the money is to play in a dodgeball tournament. From here there is a litany of various people taking rubber balls to the head, chest, legs, face, etc… The sound almost becomes redundant and annoying. The one shining moment comes in the shape of an always acerbic Rip Torn. He has but a moment in this trailer but it is a funny one at that. I can only hope that this movie is a lot better than the trailer but I am not holding out much hope if this is the best that they come up with to sell this thing.

    SPIDER-MAN 2 (2004)

    Director: Sam Raimi
    Cast: Tobey Maguire, Kirsten Dunst, Alfred Molina, James Franco, Elizabeth Banks, Bruce Campbell, Rosemary Harris, J.K. Simmons, Vanessa Ferlito, Ted Raimi, Dylan Baker
    Release: June 30th
    Synopsis: Spider-Man 2 explores the Peter’s character as he faces new challenges and struggles with “the gift and the curse,” desperately trying to balance his dual identities as the web-slinging superhero Spider-Man and his life as a college student. Tormented by his secrets, Peter finds that his relationships with all those he holds dear are in danger of unraveling. His life-long yearning for M.J. (Dunst) becomes even stronger as he fights the impulse to reveal his secret life and declare his love. His friendship with Harry Osborn (Franco) is complicated by the young Osborn’s bitterness over his father’s death and his growing vendetta against Spider-Man. Even Peter’s beloved Aunt May (Harris), who has fallen on hard times after the death of Uncle Ben, begins to have doubts about her nephew. Peter’s life is about to become even more complicated as he encounters a formidable new foe — Dr. Otto Octavius (Molina). Peter must use all the powers at his disposal to try to stop this diabolical madman in his octagonal tracks.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (QuickTime) * Medium (QuickTime)

    * Large (Quick Time)

    Prognosis: The Gold Standard By Which All Should Be Measured.

    I am going to stick to what’s here and not stray too far into sycophantic idolatry.

    Aunt May starts things off right with a little voice over. It works well, as a device, because of her importance to the narrative.

    “I believe there is a hero in all of us even though sometimes we have to give up the thing we want the most.”

    Yes, at the end of SPIDER-MAN essentially lets go of Mary Jane Watson as he realizes that by being close to her he is putting her life in danger and, thus, lets the supa-fine lady go just because he can’t learn to deal.

    What a moron.

    The trailer opens up as that lonely life is realized, clad in all his squalid splendor, as he is shown just trying to eek out an existence as a photographer for the Daily Bugle. But, as these things go, things just go from bad to even worse as he is canned by none other than J. Jonah Jameson with a “you’re fired” in a way that The Donald will never be able to match, is confronted by a professor to tell him his grades are in the can, and he comes to the conclusion, later, to physically put his costume in the trash can. There is some metaphor running through these things but I am just floored by the amount of seamless CGI that is on parade in this mutha.

    From the opening shots of Spidey swinging on a string, chasing after a couple of ne’er do wells (From the crooks in the comic-y black clothes, densely knit caps and driving open topped convertibles, possibly a close relative to the Raimi signature 1973 Oldsmobile Delta Royal, on densely populated streets it is nerd heaven.), to the moment when Harry Osborn comes on the screen for the first time, severely perturbed about the whole Spider-Man/killing his father/mistaken identity thing.

    I’m not going to homogenously say that all the effects made me quiver with school girl delight. There was a shot where he is coming out of a window awfully quick, and it took me out of the moment however brief, but no matter! My geek self-defense mechanism reminded me how the spider, like from the first one, when the whole class went to that lab that one time, and the spider leapt from one branch to the other really quick, and so like when he’s doing it in the new one, well, you get the point. Everything here is easily defended by enough wasted brain power.

    “No matter what I do, it’s the ones I love that will always be the ones to pay. I want a life of my own. I’m Spider-Man no more.”

    Peter essentially scrubs off Spider-Man from his life, leaving it behind to pursue more manly desires. No matter that MJ says she’s getting married. Peter is a backed up plebe that desires some of that redheaded delight. The plot smacks of SUPERMAN II but damn if that wasn’t a great sequel. Superman getting his ass kicked was more than enough to make that flick a winner and how else can you come back after the first one did gangbusters? You have your hero give up, that’s what.

    From this stepping stone we get J. Jonah again letting us know that Doc Ock has his four tentacles welded right on his body. The delicate shot, the intricate inner workings of how those tentacles actually work on his back is done perfectly. From knowing how the original coils, in the comic book, looked grey and lengthy to the industrial yellow speckled weapons they are in the movie shows what can happen when literalists can just smoke their latest copy of Wizard and stick the rest up their sedentary hindquarters. The trailer just throttles everything it has right from there and doesn’t let up. Alfred Molina, doing a creepy job as Doctor Octopus, and getting a nice close-up in the middle of the day, as he very matter-of-factly lets Parker know that he will “peel the flesh” from MJ’s bones. His voice carries with it a certain believability that even I doubted when he was first cast (yes, I was part of the camp that was unsure of Molina’s ability to inhabit an impish turd like Octavius. I’ll call myself out. I have no problem with that.) but he is good in a way that some people wish Dafoe had been.

    The operatic music starts in and the hairs tickle my neck as they stand at attention. We get short, cut scenes of a spectacular above ground subway train fight, some senseless violence, lots of fire, crap is being tossed left, right, up and down by Doc’s arms, Peter is getting some of that soft pink (lips, that is) from MJ, and then the topper, the shot of Harry standing over a prostrated Spidey with a knife in one hand with the other on Spider-Man’s head, slowly pulling it off. The ending shot is good enough to be a teaser for a comic book cover.

    I would tell you how qualified Raimi is at capturing the essence of something like this and that the check should be cashed now because the writing is on the wall, blah, blah, blah. The matter of fact, the big picture of it all, is that audiences are a fickle, sinister lot. There could be something completely innocuous in this film that could turn people one way or the other. It’s unfortunate but it’s true. What I think saves this movie from going down that road is its family friendly vibe, the promise there isn’t anything wickedly salacious within it, and that this trailer simply amps up any young male in the most desired demographic of them all. What I think, now, any of us who want to see this movie should be asking is not how much money will it make, but will it be any good? Did Raimi take the check or was there the same love infused within the frames that made me believe, in the first one, that Tobey was really Spider-Man and that Kirsten was really someone who Peter needed to be with at the end.

    Having to wait so long to get the answer has never been more painful.

    April 9, 2004

    Trailer Park: $39,167

    Filed under: Columns,Trailer Park — admin @ 2:34 am

    E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES

    By Christopher Stipp

    April 9th, 2004

    $39,167

    $39,167 is what SHAOLIN SOCCER made last week in its debut across America. Was it that bad? Was it so unwatchable that people chose weeks old offerings like DIRTY DANCING: HAVANA NIGHTS and SOMETHING’S GOTTA GIVE (which is out already on DVD) because it sucked so bad? No.

    SHAOLIN SOCCER debuted at six theaters across the country. Limited release would a humorous understatement.

    Six theaters decided it was worth showing and you know what they found in return? Without waiting for your refrain I’ll tell you that SHAOLIN SOCCER earned a better per screen average than THE PRINCE AND ME, WALKING TALL and most every other movie in the top fifteen at the box office. HELLBOY beat it, barely, and I am glad for the six theaters that were able to get people to come out and see it. It’s nice to see a movie supported in such a fashion. If you were to multiply the number out, factoring in an average wide release and compensate for weak markets, the figure would have a financially impressive dollar amount. Of course, would it play well Boones Farm, Iowa? Maybe not, but it did well enough to send a message, however loud forty grand can be, and I hope when HERO comes out, if ever, that it doesn’t suffer the fate of a six screen debut. It deserves better. (End of rant)

    Zach Braff has made a name for himself by playing Dr. Dorian on Scrubs but his new movie, GARDEN STATE, which he wrote and directed, did some great word-of-mouth buzz during Sundance this year. The reviews were very kind as it looked like television’s affable young doctor had something else brewing under that wide smile and gentle good looks. The trailer looks great, and it gets double points for having Natalie Portman prominently displayed, and serves as a perfect calling card for others who wonder if a movie like this is worth their time. It goes without saying that it’s the clip of the week but I’ll say it anyway: it’s the clip of the week. Enjoy with my compliments and here’s to hoping Scrubs can make it through season five; syndication’s never always a good thing, but it would be for them. Just as long as Fonzie doesn’t decide to use his motorcycle to make a dashing leap over a fish tank with a motorcycle we will all be fine.

    MR. 3000 (2004)

    Director: Charles Stone
    Cast: Bernie Mac, Angela Bassett, Evan Jones, Chris Noth, Michael Rispoli, Paul Sorvino, Brian White
    Release: September 24, 2004
    Synopsis: Seven years ago, a vain and jaded baseball star (Bernie Mac) retired from the sport as soon as achieving his 3,000th base hit, and his place within the select group who have achieved that distinction. Now, however, after three of those hits during his time with the Milwaukee Brewers have been disqualified, the Hall of Famer returns to the game, playing once again for the Brewers, to play a few more games and get back to the 3,000 mark, but along the way, he discovers that the experience renews his love for the sport, reminding him what it was like to be a young boy obsessed with a simple game involving sticks, balls and running in a circle, as he finds himself imparting some of this knowledge to a young rookie he mentors.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (QuickTime)
    * Medium (QuickTime)
    * Large (QuickTime)

    Progonosis: Positive.

    There is an argument that could be made that Bernie Mac’s recent film career with bit parts in movies like BAD SANTA, HEAD OF STATE, and CHARLIE’S ANGELS is simply representative of a comedian who has done well and is now being exploited until his usefulness runs out.

    He has a successful television show, he has the sequel to OCEAN’S ELEVEN coming up later this year and has this headlining gig in a new film directed by the man who brought us DRUMLINE, PAID IN FULL and all those zany, crazy, wacky Budweiser commercials where everyone says “whassup”or a similarly themed question.

    Watching this trailer, and knowing who made the movie, I am curious to know who the demographic is that this film should appeal to. My knee jerk reaction to what the beginning of this trailer feels like? Rod Tidwell Redux. You have the attitude, the pubic persona of a man who doesn’t answer to anyone and, most interestingly, someone who performs in low-rent commercials. In an era when Mark Grace, one of the best to recently retire from the big leagues, is doing commercials on my television screen for a local auto dealership the trailer hits close to home in a very amusing way.

    This is a great vehicle for Mac and I’ll tell you why: it accentuates his already developed character in the mainstream media. He comes off like kind of a codger, a disgruntled older man, but also possesses a delicately hidden sweet spot that gets some air every now and then.

    Angela Bassett, who has been M.I.A. since last year’s MASKED AND ANONYMOUS (and, hell, who wouldn’t be after that extremely slow burning paper bag of dog crap?) has some good screen time here and makes me long for more films with her in it.

    The music? Probably the one thing that gets me angrier than anything else concerning this trailer has to be the use of K7’s “Come Baby Come” and 2 Unlimited’s “Get Ready For This.”

    Stop it. All of you. Techno music does not age like fine wine. It decomposes like a small sample of uranium. Its half-life expired in 1994. I’ll say it slow like I would tell my dog: Cut it the hell out. I get it already. You want to make the music fit the trailer in the same way that NPR matches lead outs with witty selections that reflect the story they just discussed. What trailer makers need is a little lesson in what makes witty and what makes wit-less. It’s a shame because this is actually a fairly amusing trailer.

    Even though I have some reservations about the movie because of the genre, the sports film, and the time it wasted by making a Tom Arnold/Roseanne joke, I at least have some positive feelings towards a picture I would otherwise make an effort to miss.

    GREY DOG (2004)

    Director: Justin Viar
    Cast: Scott Kennedy, Catherine Barlow, Greggory Williams, Matt Miller, Rosh, Robin Heath
    Release: Coming Soon
    Synopsis: When you spend most of your life in prison, getting out is a big day. For Deke, Karl and Dubdub, this is the day. Adjusting to the outside world proves to be more complicated than they thought. The long bus ride home shows them who they were, who they are and who they will be.

    View Trailer:
    * Large (Windows Media)

    Progonosis: Positive.

    The opening sequence, with the exception of the guy who looks like a blonde Carrot Top with a red trucker’s hat beating the snot of someone or something, is wonderfully shot. It has a little slo-mo, some exposition, and a little character setup. Perfect. There are some blocking of the characters that seems a little forced and not natural but it can be forgiven.

    Then the supports come onscreen. Based on the description of the film I am to suppose that things take place in one day and judging by the trailer it seems that way. Before any dialogue comes in to play there is a rather interesting choice for music. A little fuzz pedal, classic rock, keyboard infusion captures the right mood in what this movie seems to be about before transitioning, effortlessly, into a little showcasing into the abilities of the writer.

    Some of the dialogue felt, just like some of the movements of the principal characters, a little stilted. With snippets like “the world is our oyster,” while not that bad in the grandiose presentation of the film itself, is easily looked over when focusing on how well the movie seems to be directed. Did the best bits make it into the trailer? Did only the most effective scenes get spliced in? I don’t think so. If some of the larger, more fleshed out pieces, of the film are presented in the same fashion as this trailer I have no doubt this would be one of the better indie films out there.

    I could be wrong, though.

    How many times have you seen something where the director simply wants to make a film where the statement overrides the story or there’s a moment in the movie where characters have grandiose monologues that feel so out of place? A few times I’m sure. This film looks to make a statement but the direction feels so warm and inviting that I’m not at all skittish about wanting to watch the film in its entirety to find out.

    This trailer is a cool refreshment in a general population of otherwise visually loud and distracting trailers. There seems to be real heart here, realizing no one sets out to make a bad movie, with the exception of the people at Troma Studios, but there needs to be something behind that delicate need to have a movie understood and accepted as a welcome addition into the canon of film. The trailer for GREY DOG makes me want to see the foibles, mistakes, missteps because there is something there, intangible, that is worth a look if nothing else.

    DE-LOVELY (2003)

    Director: Irwin Winkler
    Cast: Kevin Kline, Ashley Judd, Natalie Cole, Sheryl Crow, Mario Frangoulis, Mick Hucknall, Alanis Morissette, Jonathan Pryce, Elvis Costello, Lara Fabian, Vivian Green, Diana Krall, Robbie Williams
    Release: June 25, 2004 (limited)
    Synopsis: De-lovely is an original musical portrait of American composer Cole Porter, filled with his unforgettable songs. In the film, Porter is looking back on his life as if it was one of his spectacular stage shows, with the people and events of his life becoming the actors and action onstage. Through elaborate production numbers and legendary hits like “Anything Goes,” “It’s De-lovely,” and “Night and Day,” Porter’s elegant, excessive past comes to light – including his deeply complicated relationship with his wife and muse, Linda Lee Porter. Directed by Academy Award(r)-winner Irwin Winkler from a script by Jay Cocks and starring Oscar(r)-winner Kevin Kline, Ashley Judd, and Jonathan Pryce in addition to some of today’s biggest rock and pop music stars, De-lovely is a sparkling celebration of Porter’s music as well as a stirring exploration of the artist’s journey and the undying power of love.

    View Trailer:
    * Various (Windows Media, RealOne)

    Progonosis: Positive.

    While I’m not sure this will change the perception of most, this clip shows that there might be more than crying, running away from homicidal ex-husbands, and pandering to the camera, to Ashley Judd’s movie career.

    Like many, I had high hopes after seeing HEAT. She was positively splendid in her ability to affect the emotions of a wife who has been though it all and still manages to scrape together a semblance of stability in her life. She was angry, sad, lonely, but, at the very end, when she gives a cue to a bullet-holed Val from a balcony for him to stay away for fear of arrest, it was believable and tender. I dare you, nay, I ask you to tell me what she has done that has matched that performance. I can see KISS THE GIRLS as coming close as that’s the movie that started the whole serial murder/killing your husband/doesn’t-Farrah-Faucet-have-a-monopoly-on-this-genre downslide for her. What she does in this trailer is to reign in that over-acting that made her so infamous and looks to take a more relaxed, natural approach to this role. She looks every bit like a million bucks, playing the romantic interest in one of history’s greatest music men, Cole Porter.

    Kevin Kline is in the actor’s suit for ol’ Cole and he looks every bit the part. With knowing exactly zero about the man I can safely assert that Kline has the kind of charisma that, if not indicative of Porter himself, is endearing nonetheless to this role. He is very smooth, graceful and exudes the kind of confidence in a role I hadn’t seen since ICE STORM. There are moments here, short bursts really, of genuine tenderness and it works to Kline’s favor. The things and people around him only elevate the appearance of a solid movie. He simply glides through this trailer and is every bit the showman that he is supposed to be embodying. However, he is not the only one.

    The preponderance of some of music’s golden children are of some importance to note here. There are guest stars in this film. What begins to shake my confidence in this picture, however, is the inclusion of Alanis Morissette, Diana Krall, Elvis Costello, Sheryl Crow, Robbie Williams, and Natalie Cole seem to me like another episode of American Dreams, not a motion picture. It was jarring to see them included here and it is my hope that they do not take attention away from the narrative like some gnat that’s attracted to the funk of sweaty pits.

    However, Jonathan Price, one of the most underrated actors working today, is in it and he looks to have a wonderful supporting role GLENGARRY GLEN ROSS was one of his most powerful, yet short, appearances and he has the kind of power that a fistful of dynamite has when it is squeezed into tightly packed rocks. Maybe he can act as a countermeasure to the glaring attraction that the musical guests will certainly get.

    Also, and I know it may be irrelevant, but since this only Irvin Winkler’s sixth time out as a director, his past exploits including LIFE AS A HOUSE, AT FIRST SIGHT and THE NET, but he has yet to really bring a picture to life in a vibrant way. He is ambitious to develop a sincere, meaningful story and let’s hope that six time’s a charm.

    IMAGINING ARGENTINA (2004)

    Director: Christopher Hampton
    Cast: Antonio Banderas, Emma Thompson, Horacio Flash
    Release: April 23 (UK)
    Synopsis: Set in 1970’s Argentina Carlos Rueda (Antonio Banderas) is the director of a children’s theatre in Buenos Aires, a city haunted by the continual disappearance of individuals who dare to speak out against the brutal dictatorship. When his wife Cecelia (Emma Thompson) who is a successful journalist begins to write a controversial article in the local news paper she too disappears. Deeply distraught by the turn events Carlos along with his daughter Teresa (Leticia Dolera) sets out to discover what happened to his beloved wife.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (Windows Media)

    Progonosis: Positive.

    Emma Thompson.

    The first movie I saw with Emma was MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING. In terms of Shakespearian adaptations it still ranks in the top five productions I’ve ever seen. From Denzel to Keaton to Branagh and, yes, even Keanu it was pure inspiration to watch. Even now, as Emma chooses roles like someone scanning a box of chocolates, seeming to get the creamy caramel ones by accident, there is something in the roles she chooses that still gives me hope there is an actor out there who really wants to be relevant but sees little need, with the exception of a few JUNIOR’s, with churning out crap. Emma was wonderful in Angels in America, Wit and she looks to step on the precipice, again, of getting involved with a big Hollywood affair by adding some class to things. This trailer, and movie, starting off in 1976, begins with Emma being taken hostage. If there were a more perfect person to be cast in this role please let them speak now. Emma, throughout this clip, displays the steely resolve that make her the one person who could play someone like this without giving the role a false sheen.

    Oddly enough, Antionio Banderas makes an appearance in this film and I am not ashamed to admit he looks great. He simply looks great. He doesn’t have locks of hair draping into his face that he has to put into a scrunchie for ONCE UPON A TIME IN MEXICO, he doesn’t have the Soul Glo look from FEMME FATALE that did not endear himself to any kind of sympathy and he sure as hell doesn’t have the smarmy attitude I grew to loathe in the SPY KIDS series. He looks natural in this trailer and that is a very good thing. There was a reason he was put into films and this makes him semi-presentable as someone who should be taken seriously and not derided for his silliness.

    Black screen, white letters: 30,000 tortured and murdered. What a great way to establish some feeling of danger and suspense. Spliced with some file footage this period piece is all about capturing mood and, as the trailer progresses, it does it with subdued flair and panache. Antonio is afflicted with the kind of odd, mental ability to “tap into” the things around him. He has visions and he cannot control what he sees, blah, blah, blah. This might be something that could turn the film into kind of fluff, but Antonio brings things up to a respectable level and he makes me believe that he could possibly rise above the gimmick.

    With no date slated, domestically, for this picture to arrive here in the States it would be of interest to me to see how the rest of the world reacts to a super-powered Antonio trying to solve the crime of a missing Emma Thompson. If Emma is bringing the same dramatic personae from her work as of late, Antonio could die in a fire of bullets for I care as long as she makes it out alive.

    GARDEN STATE (2004)

    Director: Zach Braff
    Cast: Zach Braff, Natalie Portman, Peter Sarsgaard, Ian Holm
    Release: July 30th
    Synopsis: When Andrew Largeman (Zach Braff) returns to his hometown for his mother’s funeral, he reconnects with old friends and – since he’s gone off his depression medication – himself. A chance meeting with Sam (Natalie Portman), who also suffering from various maladies, opens his world to the possibility of rekindling emotional attachments, confronting his psychologist father, and perhaps beginning a new life.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (QuickTime)

    * Medium (QuickTime)

    * Large (Quick Time)


    Progonosis: Positive.

    Hey, isn’t that the movie from the guy who’s in that show that used to be on Thursday and now is on Tuesday?

    Simply based on the trailer Zach Braff is going to be someone, much like the always affable and stalwart George Clooney, who will find actual success beyond NBC’s clutches. Yes, Jennifer Aniston was simply perfect in OFFICE SPACE and even THE GOOD GIRL, but c’mon, how you can compare those to OCEAN’S 11, CONFESSIONS OF A DANGEROUS MIND, and OUT OF SIGHT. Garden State looks like a movie that will, hopefully, allow Braff to be seen beyond his role as a comedic punch line in a great situational comedy.

    When this trailer opens, mood and engagement with the viewer is instantaneously established. With oxygen masks rocking back and forth in a symphonic slow dance it is a wonderful image. As DIE HARD 2 and even TWILIGHT ZONE: THE MOVIE was quick to point out, you can never go wrong with certain doom aboard an aircraft and it’s employed well here. The verisimilitude inside the troubled plane, whether it is a figment a la FIGHT CLUB, or real, like CON AIR for example, interspersing this image with the very personal moment that go along with someone sliding down a slope of personal tragedy (was that a symbol I heard?) that the subsequent image of a funeral conveys was a great thing to pack in the front end of this trailer.

    And then we come upon, but not directly, of course, Natalie Portman. To be honest, I wasn’t a fan of how she looked in THE PROFESSIONAL. I thought she was rock solid in the part but I thought her career was pretty much going to be stopped dead from the very non-descript facial features and incessant bawling that was happening on screen. It wasn’t until I was mauled by the likes of Dakota Fanning and her cutesy ilk that showed me how great she was and now is. GARDEN STATE only looks to solidify her place as a true, professional actress who is still making the transition of child star to full-fledged actress. There are some evocative shots of every emotion she musters so well, whether that be her smiling, crying or standing aloof. And that’s one of the things that prevalent in this trailer: the friends here seem close yet quite distant from not only each other but from the camera. The shots chosen show some of that even in the scenes where they are not present.

    As this thing is taking the decent to the credits, it kicks things into overdrive (with a great choice of music from Frou Frou ) with perfect selections of the various characters and the situations contain therein. I also believe it is my duty to say there is a blink-and-you’ll-miss-it shot of a guy shooting a flaming arrow; as some of you know I might as well get my ticket now simply based on that. What is also of interest to me, and to report, is the inclusion of the accolades Braff received from advance screenings of this movie.

    If it was anyone else, I might object to that. Screw what people think, I say, and put your art out there, be judged, and feel confident. Alas, the side of me that is concerned with the ever shrinking marketplace for films like this realizes this might actually let people know this is a “safer” bet if they read some other people like it so they can feel safe blowing their entertainment dollar on this one. Just like a dust jacket of an unknown book that needs some love, so too does GARDEN STATE.

    It’s not dour enough to look depressing and it’s warm enough to feel like it’s something you can curl up to. That’s a lock in my book.

    April 2, 2004

    Trailer Park: Anything A Spider Can

    Filed under: Columns,Trailer Park — admin @ 2:35 am

    E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES

    By Christopher Stipp

    April 2nd, 2004

    ANYTHING A SPIDER CAN

    So, ShoWest was last week.

    For those that don’t know, ShoWest is a convention that features “a variety of studio sponsored events, informative seminars” and is, “a trade show filled with the latest and greatest innovations in motion picture technology.” It’s essentially way for your local mega multiplex owner to come see what’s new and improved in the world of the movie theater business. One of the nice things about this whole thing was that many new movie posters surfaced from the hallowed halls of the studio’s marketing department and it also gives a good look at what to expect this summer season.

    There were trailers galore along with video, print, and web reporters on hand to cover it all. There were remotes by Extra, Entertainment Tonight and even my crappy local stations (who, I have to say, without fail, smilingly slap a stamp of approval to any movie they’re told to pimp regardless of how shitty the movie actually is) got involved in this annual event.

    I guess the whole trailer angle was lost on those in the know in the industry as I think my invitation to the party got lost in the mail. I mean some other, more inferior web reporters had a jolly time, whooping it up in Sin City whilst I sat here in Phoenix calling my local postmaster general letting him that, no, there must be some mistake and charges would be filed against my local heathen of a mailman who must have stolen my golden ticket. I mean, c’mon, who would be a bigger whore than me? I read the manuals. I know that if you’re invited to a junket you’re supposed to say nice things about a flick or else be relegated to refugee status in the studio’s playbook and that I won’t ever be able to nosh on free food, get free stuff or get close to actors who get to hear me ask simpering, sycophantic questions that they’ve already heard a few times already. I understand all of this and would like to be a talking head, please, because I heard the Spider-Man 2 trailer event was, in a word, an experience.

    If you have an internet pulse at all you may have already heard that Sony had a large affair for Spider-Man 2. There were people writhing on the ground like human spiders, faux webs bedecked the theater, free swag flowed like freshly crushed grapes, and even Maguire and Dunst were on hand all to…show…a…trailer. In case you missed that, one more time please, Maguire and Dunst were on hand, along with the accoutrements of a premiere, just to show a trailer. From the reports I read, again, I’m on the case to find out where my invite went, the trailer kicked “all sorts of ass” to quote an individual who saw it firsthand. It is a large improvement over the first teaser trailer that’s running rampant all over the net. While the first trailer isn’t that bad, it’s really good capturing the same vibe of the first, there were some things that were being held back. You could tell. The newest one is supposed to be packed, wall-to-wall, with nothing but Spidey goodness. There is fighting, explosions, fire, swinging, chicks, no flaming arrows, but it’s got a lot squeezed into a tiny time frame. The downside to it all? The thing isn’t debuting to the general public, meaning us lepers who weren’t asked to see it yet, until April 9th. My word of advice? I see people hype things up beyond reasonable expectations (read here: HELLBOY) and the movies never seem to live up to the imaginations we all have when they’re allowed to create an image of perfection in the form of a film. It never quite comes close. So, as you get prepped to experience anything like this, do yourself a favor and lower your expectations. Have absolutely the worst attitude you can before watching something like this. In fact, be downright ornery. I’m serious. When you don’t expect much from entertainment like this your experience can only be that much better when you can see something for what it is and not for what someone else says it is. Need evidence? STAR WARS: EPISODE I. Low expectations. Works great for people too.

    I’m still biting my nails to see the trailer, though.

    NEW WORLD (2004)

    Director: Peter John Ross
    Cast: George Caleodis, Fritz Cargould, Milan A. Cargould, Kevin Carr, Glen Littlejohn, John Mader, Jon Osbeck, Dovie Pettitt, Ryan Stefano
    Release: Currently Playing
    Synopsis: New World brings high adventure and special FX to a short series of internet movies. Focusing on a time on Earth after aliens have invaded, a group a young upstarts begin to fight back against the insect-like Invaders.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (QuickTime)


    Progonosis: Positive.

    Quite simply, graphics and effects-wise, it looks fantastic. As for the guys wearing Mexican rugs like ponchos and wielding swords like Adrian Paul after getting their Highlander starter kit in the mail.

    The opening montage, with the writing on the screen and the slow, fade-in movement of a CG ship was a great way to start things. After the initial shot, the music and mood of the trailer sustains itself well with some fairly impressive graphics and good camera angles. After that, though, that’s when things get a little murky.

    I am not sure, as a viewer, what exactly is happening on the screen. I see some beautifully rendered ships and flying objects but I am not really positive about the dichotomy between who is “good” and who is “bad.” There is no point of reference for me to differentiate or discern between the two.

    What I liked most about the trailer is its focus on trying to accentuate the visuals but also giving a little attention to the players who will have to, inevitably, drive the action forward. However, I never really get to hear them talk or get an idea for their motivation. Probably the worst action cliché in trailerdom is a voiceover that invariably says to us that “what had started out…” as they plug in a shake-n-bake storyline to fit within some loose parameters. As an independent movie, however, some people like to just twist that convention, hopefully, and give the genre a fresh look on things. This leads me to say that I don’t know if that what’s happening here. Where do things start out? Maybe a little cliché would help establish some point of reference for me. To wit, I have no clue if I am supposed to be rooting for Gringo Steve wearing the Mexican poncho or for the balding, black cloth clad individual as they clash samurai swords. I, obviously, have an idea but I can’t assume anything.

    I am unsure of the actual story behind this film and would like to know more about what’s happening and the kind of dialogue I can expect from the production. I want to know more, need to know more, before I would give up however long it would be to see the final product. Right now, as it stands, I am feeling it would play perfectly to that segment of the population that loves their science fiction. I am not talking about X-MEN or MINORITY REPORT but I am specifically thinking about Andromeda or even the new incarnation of Enterprise. It’s those kind of demographics that this film seems to appeal to most.

    THE DOOR IN THE FLOOR (2004)

    Director: Tod Williams
    Cast: Jeff Bridges, Kim Basinger, Mimi Rogers, Bijou Phillips, Elle Fanning
    Release: June 23, 2004
    Synopsis: Set in a privileged East Hampton beach community, the film chronicles one pivotal summer in the lives of famous children’s author Ted Cole (Bridges) and his beautiful wife Marion (Basinger). Their once-great marriage has been strained by tragedy. Her resulting despondency and his subsequent infidelities have prevented the couple from confronting a much-needed change in their relationship. Eddie O’Hara, the young man Ted hires to work as a summer assistant, is the couple’s unwitting yet willing pawn – and, ultimately, the catalyst in the transformation of their lives.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (Windows Media)

    Progonosis: Negative.

    John Irving has had a few films made from his work as an author.

    For those not up on such things, Irving has penned THE CIDER HOUSE RULES, THE WORLD ACCORDING TO GARP, SIMON BIRCH and even THE HOTEL NEW HAMPSHIRE which starred his older brother, Beau. His works, at least from a cinematic standpoint, have a much deeper shine to them than let’s say many of the works from the author of litigious fiction. When coming upon this trailer, though, not once does it reference this fact. Not that John Irving is better than the other John I just mentioned, but that he was responsible for helping to give the world one of the best nuanced performances from Robin Williams and gave the world a great, hard look at an actor really looking to break out by the name of John Lithgow.

    Beyond the fact that this movie looks like a hardcore drama of depressing proportions it does start with a scruffy, yet dashingly masculine, Jeff Bridges. As an aside, it’s nice to see him in something new after he did a splendid job in SEABISCUIT last year and this movie is the only thing in his pipeline until 2005. As the clip progresses we establish he is a creepy children’s book author and has a hottie for a wife in the shape of Kim Basinger. As another aside, as this seems to be a movie about a couple on the outs, let’s hope this movie doesn’t have her character crying endlessly a la Meg Ryan. She does, however, seduce the young protégé of Jeff Bridges and that’s not such a bad thing. If you’re a young lad, and are going to get seduced by someone, Kim Basinger is probably the best woman for the job. Either kind of job that she would perform would be sufficient enough.

    What could make this a better trailer than it is, even elevating it to a positive review instead of a negative one is the cheesy, generic Stryper guitar riffs that some guy who produced this thing thought would be a good idea. It distracts from the progression of the narrative and puts in an 80’s era tension device where it’s not needed. Keep the guitar riffing for AIRHEADS 2, Skid Row, as this is a drama not a high school battle of the bands playoff.

    There are moments of the slow motion running by ol’ Jeff which is always elevates his performance in whatever he does. Just look at BLOWN AWAY and you can see why he so good at doing it. There is even a shot of Jeff riding a bike with what looks like a sombrero. Any movie that has a man riding a bike with an oversized hat just can’t be all that bad. He gets double points if he’s doing it while intoxicated. He’s even wearing a bed sheet to play racquetball. Hopefully this means we are dealing with a man headed on a road to self-destruction. It would help to sustain some interest and hope there’ll be a full-on implosion of the suicidal kind. In all, it looks like a good date movie and I would recommend this to any guy, if you were forced to pick from what’s out there, as you may get some nice Kim Basinger action for your troubles. Jeff Bridges is wonderful to watch and I would pay simply based on his cred as a bankable actor. He’s a rarity.

    THE CLEARING (2004)

    Director: Jeff Nathanson
    Cast: Robert Redford, Helen Mirren, Willem Dafoe, Matt Craven, Alessandro Nivola, Melissa Sagemiller
    Release: May 21, 2004
    Synopsis: Wayne (Robert Redford) and Eileen (Helen Mirren) Hayes live the American Dream. Together they’ve raised two children and struggled to build a successful business from the ground up. But there have been sacrifices along the way. When Wayne is kidnapped by an ordinary man, Arnold Mack (Willem Dafoe), and held for ransom in a remote forest, the couple’s world is turned inside out. Eileen finds her home full of FBI Agents, their life under scrutiny. While Wayne is engaged in the negotiation of his lifetime, Eileen works frantically with the FBI to secure his release. The terrifying ordeal causes Wayne and Eileen to reassess their marriage and come to a deeper sense of their commitment to each other. With each passing hour, the need and desire for Wayne to return home safely becomes ever more urgent.

    View Trailer:
    * Various (Windows Media, QuickTime, RealOne)

    Progonosis: Positive.

    I’m not sure where this one lands, as confessions go, but one of my favorite Robert Redford performances isn’t the NATURAL or OUT OF AFRICA; it is most definitely a tie between SNEAKERS and INDECENT PROPOSAL. The cries of “the horror, the horror,” I know are probably ringing like Big Ben but it makes perfect sense if you go with me on this.

    Ol’ Redford has taken his time with films. He has gone years without doing anything and god love him for being able to delicately pick and choose his projects at will and not feel pressured to do anything because his property tax bill just came in for his house in the Hamptons. When I was first gravitating towards all kinds of film, around the age of ten or so, his most recent offering to the discerning moviegoer was LEGAL EAGLES and all I remember about that movie was the video for Love Touch that had some play on MTV. As a young male, Rod Stewart was not on my playlist and neither were bad romantic/drama/comedies. The first real offering from Robert, forgetting his sleepwalked performance in 1990’s HAVANA, was 1992’s SNEAKERS which I’ll defend as the one of the most enjoyable heist movies ever to be put to film. I caught up with Redford again for INDECENT PROPOSAL and it was then I found an appreciation for his older work.

    This is germane to the discussion of this trailer because after this film there will not be, if the past is any indication, another film with him in it until 2007 or 2008. He’s had some tough going at the box office for his last handfuls of films and managed to curse the radio landscape with his movie UP CLOSE AND PERSONAL (Thanks a lot, Rob, for being the vehicle that gave Celine Dion a bigger voice and secures her ditty as the single most played song in women’s cars everywhere.). This film will be a movie that first time Redford fans, I was one too, will be exposed to seeing. I was sparked alive as a young ‘un to find his older work and find a deeper appreciation for his gift as an actor.

    This trailer looks good, not great, enough to pass as acceptable fare. I say this only because the plot is obfuscated and I don’t know why that’s the case. I can only assume that Robert is being kidnapped because he did something bad to someone at sometime so long ago, but, outside of that, I am not sure if Willem Dafoe is supposed to be a “bad” guy. Make no mistake about Willem. He is one of the best, and that superlative doesn’t do the man near enough justice, out there and he could easily be playing either side of the fence. The trailer doesn’t give away anything, which I guess is a good thing, but I want to know why in the hell they are traipsing through the woods. That’s probably the whole point of the movie, right? A movie that hinges on a payoff is asking for trouble if there isn’t enough between that could support a let down if the plot twist smells like week old swamp ass. There are two greats working together in this film but I am still am not sure, and not convinced, if this thing makes me want to see it in the theaters or wait for the DVD. .

    CIGARETTES AND COFFEE (2004)

    Director: Jim Jarmuch
    Cast: Roberto Benigni, Cate Blanchett, Steve Buscemi, Steve Coogan, Isaach De Bankolé, Genius/GZA, Cinqué Lee, Joie Lee, Taylor Mead, Alfred Molina, Bill Murray, Iggy Pop, William Rice, RZA, Tom Waits, Jack White, Meg White, Steven Wright
    Release: May 14th
    Synopsis: COFFEE AND CIGARETTES is a comic series of short vignettes that build on one another to create a cumulative effect as the characters discuss things as diverse as caffeine popsicles, Paris in the twenties, and the use of nicotine as an insecticide, all the while sitting around sipping coffee and smoking cigarettes. As Jarmusch delves into the normal pace of our world from an extraordinary angle, he shows just how absorbing the obsessions, joys, and addictions of life can be. Filmed in black and white, COFFEE AND CIGARETTES made its world premiere at the Venice International Film Festival then screened to a sold-out crowd at the Toronto International Film Festival.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (Quick Time)
    * Medium (Quick Time)
    * Large (Quick Time)

    Progonosis: Positive.

    The best of the bunch in Jarmusch’s arsenal is STRANGER THAN PARADISE. I know many out there will go to bat for GHOST DOG: THE WAY OF THE SAMURAI as the best ever, but, as narratives go, I didn’t care for its style, pace or overall presentation.

    That being said, however, this film is a must see for me. Any trailer that starts with some brother giving it up for my main man Murray, feloniously robbed by a dude who just knew how to get all emotional on cue, and drops GHOSTBUSTERS and GROUNDHOG DAY as a couple of his favorite Bill movies has to be going somewhere good. Just when I think it’s going to get obtuse in a way that only Jarmusch knows how to do the trailer shows the beginning of a small row between Iggy Pop and Tom Waits about the offensiveness of being perceived as someone who would patronize a Taco Bell or as a musician who would make a shoddy record.

    The great bits keep coming, but, while the whole thing isn’t side splittingly laugh out loud, there is enough here with the celebrity cameos to more than make the case as to why this might be an interesting departure from the usual fare that sometimes can plague art house theaters. There is the possibility that having as many famous individuals playing themselves could spell out, in large neon black and white letters, pretentious pap. The only thing that would lead me to that conclusion would be the inclusion of Jack and Meg White. When I watched the trailer a second time I wasn’t so sure of their efficacy as potentially intriguing characters compared to the level of talent brimming in the rest of the clip. It looks like Meg is smirking at something that doesn’t really seem funny while Steve Coogan has a very amusing bit with Alfred “Don’t Call Me Doc Ock” Molina right before the trailer spends the rest of its time telling me who is in the movie.

    I really like the simplicity of the single table, thus really focusing in on the people and nothing else while they are conversing. It becomes a play of action, words and body language. Again, this could veer into the realm of self-indulgence and become a von Trier experiment of art vs. (insert your own social power element you dislike), but I am going to think not only because there is some humor here and the most effective satire that I know of and have read, with the exception of the Inferno, has had a sharp wit about itself.

    There is a real intimacy here with the players involved and it will force these people to utilize the essences of their experiences to make this something interesting enough to sit through. Watching two or three people talk at a table for an hour and a half plus will require more than just looking good, you have to be good. The entire movie depends, with the small exception of the many ways you can get an interesting camera angle of a cup of coffee, on performance. This trailer has a little style and a little charisma and is interesting enough to warrant a closer look at the theaters.

    HIDE AND CREEP (2004)

    Director: Chuck Hartsell and Chance Shirley
    Cast: Kyle Holman, Michael Shelton, Melissa Bush, Chris Garrison, Chris Hartsell, Chuck Hartsell, Barry Austin, John Walker
    Release: Later this year
    Synopsis: Residents of a small Southern town contend with bloodthirsty zombies, a mysterious flying saucer, and bad television reception.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (QuickTime)

    * Medium (Quick Time)

    Progonosis: Funny.

    This took some repeated viewings but I like this trailer. A lot.

    What I think is most difficult in seeing a trailer like this is that I have to, without even thinking about it, suspend my needs as a greedy trailer fiend and realize this is not being produced for hundreds and thousands of dollars with a nice soundtrack but that it is being cobbled together by a moviemaker just looking for some notice for their vision. The results, unfortunately, are sometimes mixed as a few trailers look put together with a Sony Betamax as a director succumbs to the Hollywood notion of a high value trailer and is unable to compete. Originality is what’s needed and this trailer has some great pieces of it. Is it the best indie trailer I’ve ever seen? Hell no, but it has the right idea and a pitch perfect vibe for a zombie film that looks to be less Romero and a little more Rami.

    From the opening shot of a man walking in the woods, which you’re not quite sure if this is going to try and be intentionally scary or so bad it’s funny scary, when we get a view of some rednecks with rifles and, I believe, a whole lot of mullet going on. There is also a hootchie who seems to be looking skyward but I have no clue if crap is supposed to be raining down from above (what the hell is she looking at?) and a row of bullets being set up one by one as a man sits up in the middle of a forest and ponders the location of his car and his pants.

    If this is going to be a straight zombie flick it’s going about its advertising the wrong way, but I think I know better and it is doing what it is supposed to be doing: highlighting the humor first and then set it up as a zombie film. By reversing the process it wouldn’t have worked. Some of the more successful, and effective, campaigns that epitomizes this best would have to be SHAUN OF THE DEAD that essentially gave you comedy and then the zombies.

    Here, even after the comedic set up, and the pause in the visual action to let the viewer know this is A CREWLESS PRODUCTION there is more comedy that is punctuated with some sexual innuendo, hillbilly humor, was that some nudity I saw, and maybe even, if it’s possible, a strong female lead in a usually male-centric genre? It doesn’t hurt that the woman is nice to look at, and that will definitely help to distract in small part, or large part depending on what the filmmakers choose to accentuate on her, from the production values of the film.

    The locations look well utilized, there are slivers of some great camera work, and by mixing in a good blend of humor, dialogue (what little there is), and a just a small peek of the zombies. It was more like a stolen glance, really, but I’m really not sure how I feel about that yet. The money shot should be the zombies, right? Of course they should, but if there is something different going other than zombies, maybe even relegating them to the background in favor of a different angle on the story, so be it.

    I really want to see where this story is going, even if it’s nowhere.

    March 26, 2004

    Trailer Park: Hero for Hero

    Filed under: Columns,Trailer Park — admin @ 2:36 am

    E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES

    By Christopher Stipp

    March 26, 2004

    Hero for Hero

    Another week, another set of four trailers to read.

    Yes, only four as you people are going to step in and offer some advice to some up-and-coming auteurs of cinema. There was some good response to the request for filmmakers who needed some exposure to their projects. When you watch these you can easily feel the work that went into making them and I am happy, at the very least, to offer a soap box to stand on and be judged on their trailers. Obviously, the trailers are but a sliver of the entire completed project but this is what sells a film and everyone needs your help in giving feedback about what works, what doesn’t and what could be better. This week’s independent film, NEW WORLD, looks to tackle the sci-fi genre and that’s something you don’t see that often compared to the deep, heady pictures that feel the need to capture the zeitgeist of an era. This is refreshing. Much in the same way that Red vs. Blue is parodying the Halo franchise this series looks to keep adding new chapters in its continuum. So, toss some words back at me and next week I’ll give the consensus for everyone’s reaction.

    So, before I silence myself and shut my mouth for another week, I would like to say how pleased I am that DAWN OF THE DEAD, one of the very first trailers I reviewed for this site, slammed Jesus into the turnbuckle at the box office. It’s good to know that this genre isn’t completely out of steam and out of favor with the rest of the general populace. I have yet to see it but from what I hear, even from Romero blowhards, DAWN is simply a very good film. When a good 75 to 80 percent of schlock out at the multiplex is unsatisfying pap it makes the horror fan in me happy, if for a little while, that there could more undead on the way.

    This week HERO makes my favorite trailer of the week as early word has some very high powered help assisting this film from the Pacific make its big screen debut here in the United States. Never mind it’s been a disgracefully long time since Miramax has been sitting on this diamond and once you see the trailer you see why it deserves a little love from a positive audience. I would say more but I’ll save it for the ring.

    NEW WORLD (2004)

    Director: Peter John Ross
    Cast: George Caleodis, Fritz Cargould, Milan A. Cargould, Kevin Carr, Glen Littlejohn, John Mader, Jon Osbeck, Dovie Pettitt, Ryan Stefano
    Release: Currently Playing
    Synopsis: New World brings high adventure and special FX to a short series of internet movies. Focusing on a time on Earth after aliens have invaded, a group a young upstarts begin to fight back against the insect-like Invaders.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (QuickTime)


    Progonosis: ? You tell us…

    WHITE CHICKS (2004)

    Director: Keenen Ivory Wayans
    Cast: Marlon Wayans, Shawn Wayans, Rochelle Aytes, Jennifer Carpenter, Jessica Cauffiel, Faune Chambers, Terry Crews, Brittany Daniel, Anne Dudek, James King, Lochlyn Munro
    Release: June 25, 2004
    Synopsis: Shawn and Marlon Wayans play two FBI agents trying to get back into their boss’s good graces by taking on a job guarding the Wilton sisters, two New York City hotel heiresses, from a serial kidnapper. They fail, and the two women are abducted. Then the two agents go undercover, dressing up as the titular “white chicks” to solve the crime and rescue the victims.

    View Trailer:
    * Various (Windows Media, RealOne)

    Progonosis: Negative.

    Ok. It’s a movie where two guys pass themselves off as two white ladies. Instantly, I am reminded of Lenny Henry who tried this almost same bit way back in 1991 with TRUE IDENTITY. If I remember correctly he had about as much success with that film as this one looks to enjoy. I am confused as to why the Wayans brothers decided to pitch this idea and what they said to the right suit who greenlit this turkey.

    I love the beginning of this trailer, though. We have the Wayans brothers knocking shit over as cops, making busts, getting talked to by their superior officers and I feel hopeful at this point. In fact, I was hoping they would take over the whole Martin/Smith buddy cop genre with something fresh. This is when the trailer descends into a mess of hell.

    One question: in the obligatory scene whenever a man dresses as a woman, and a purse snatcher, who is dressed here in a hackneyed grey sweatshirt and grey cap in what looks like to be a very warm time of year, grabs their purse is there a way to just fast forward through the old and busted tenet that the guy always catches up with him and beats him up? It was pure evil to watch.

    The rest of the trailer simply plays up the obvious: a straight guy gets attracted to one of the “girls” and the men display traits usually only circumscribed to male gender roles. Wonderful.

    Many of you know I am about as fair as a Wimbledon line judge when it comes to these trailers. I’ve admitted my penchant for all things flaming and explosive (arrows and glass included) but also having a sweet spot for good, affective cinema. However, what the hell is this supposed to be?

    I referenced TRUE IDENTITY, not only to its obvious aping of the whole turning a black guy into a white guy, lord knows C. Thomas Howell did it with cringing aplomb (I would still like to offer my apologies to the world for that burning sack of dog crap) and it hasn’t been done since, but what irks me is that TRUE IDENTITY’s whole gimmick was a black guy putting on, for lack of a better description, white face and acting like a “white” person. It got old quick and it never seemed to rise above the one gag. Eddie Murphy, however, back when he was still funny, did it with razor sharp hilariousness back in the eighties because it was only a sketch that lasted a few minutes. Quick, short, and effective. This gag in WHITE GIRLS will lose its steam in the first act. The fact that Keenan is at the directorial helm, though, helps me sleep better at night and I’ll tell you why.

    Keenen had no part in writing any of the SCARY MOVIE movies; that’s salvo number one. He did, however, scribe MOST WANTED and a LOW DOWN DIRTY SHAME.

    Keenen created IN LIVING COLOR, giving rise to some of the best talent in comedy today, and made I’M GONNA GIT YOU SUCKA. The latter gave the world one of the best bits of hilarity that involved Chris Rock, one rib, and a wad of bills.

    I can’t really endorse seeing this film from what I saw but I would genuinely be happy if I were to be wrong about where I see this movie headed.

    THE LAST SHOT (2004)

    Director: Jeff Nathanson
    Cast: Matthew Broderick, Alec Baldwin, W. Earl Brown, Toni Collette, Calista Flockhart, Judy Greer, William H. Macy, Tim Blake Nelson, Rob Schneider, Tony Shalhoub
    Release: TBA
    Synopsis: The focus of this ensemble comedy is a struggling filmmaker whose dream of directing his script by working outside the traditional Hollywood system comes true (as long as he films in Providence, Rhode Island) until he discovers that his miracle producer (Baldwin) is actually an undercover FBI agent who is just using the production as part of a sting operation designed to connect reports of union manipulation with the mafia.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (QuickTime)

    Progonosis: Comfortably Positive As soon as this trailer starts, I know I’ve heard this one before.

    It had been some time but I knew where the plot was going, almost like déjà vu, and I stopped watching the trailer to investigate. It took only a few sparks of intuition and some clicking before I realized it was on NPR; specifically, it was episode 244 of This American Life. The real story was about a movie producer who sets out to make a movie under the supervision of a not too convincing FBI agent who tries to pass himself as a Hollywood mogul in an attempt to uncover mob corruption without letting the producer in on the sting. I don’t want to give the whole story away but it is an utterly fascinating twenty-five minutes of radio theater. This, however, brings us back to the trailer.

    As it starts up again, I quickly see where the real story ends and the liberal stretching of the truth begins, the trailer is good and quick about setting the movie premise up. It captures the silliness of the whole teamsters/bribing/sting/informant angle and plays it for laughs; it could have gone either way.

    It was nice to see Matthew Broderick in a major film role since his delicately played persona in YOU CAN COUNT ON ME and he’s wonderful to watch playing the part of the rube who has no idea what he’s involved in. I think if there’s one thing that saves this trailer from being an average, ho-hum affair is the focus on Broderick’s oafishness as he tries to navigate a very strange situation. There are great bits of Alec and Matthew playing serious comedy and it overrides a very annoying, pestering voiceover that gets in the way of my enjoyment.

    Por ejemplo, Broderick asks Baldwin if his wife is also in the business; that business to which he’s referring, of course, is the move making industry. Baldwin, oblivious and with a straight face, replies: “Why would I marry a whore?”

    Love it. That’s comedy gold in them thar trailer, son.

    Also, I’m confused as to the inclusion of Peter Gabriel’s “Big Time.” Ooo”¦.how witty of you marketing magnates. Was Flock of Seagulls demanding too much for “I Ran” or was there another eighties classic that you couldn’t afford to swing in your marketing budget? Like I pointed out above, the voice of God as he does his voiceover is distracting as is the amateur look of the fonts used to tell me who’s who in the film and that, even though I heard you the first time, it really is based on a true story. Jeff Nathanson is the first time director on this project and is credited as helping to pen the adaptation to the screen. For those not in the know Nathanson is also credited for brining ANOTHER based on a true story to life in the shape of CATCH ME IF YOU CAN.

    P.s. – Toni Collette is in full frontal black underwear showing off her acting acumen, but since that appeals to the juvenile in me they get an A for effort.

    CONNIE AND CARLA (2004)

    Director: Michael Lembeck
    Cast: Nia Vardalos, Toni Collette, Stephen Spinella, Dash Mihok, David Duchovny
    Release: April 16, 2004
    Synopsis: Vardalos and Collette play Connie and Carla, two struggling Chicago dinner theater performers who accidentally witness a mafia hit”¦and who subsequently hit the road, running for their lives. Assuming the killers will never look for them in a place devoid of culture, the pair head to Los Angeles, where they assume new identities and find their middling talent at song and dance perfectly suited to new careers – as drag queens. Much to their surprise, they inadvertently become the toast of the cabaret circuit. As their ruse becomes increasingly difficult to maintain, they discover that it is indeed lonely at the top, especially after Connie meets Jeff (Duchovny), a guy she’d really like to be a real girl with. With the mafia zeroing in and the line separating their onstage/offstage personas blurring beyond the point of recognition, Connie and Carla soon discover the power of not compromising to pursue your dreams, fighting the good fight and never, never underestimating the transformative power of cosmetics.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (Windows Media, Quick Time, RealOne)
    * Small (Quick Time)
    * Medium (Quick Time)
    * Large (Quick Time)

    Progonosis: This is a MUST SEE for every woman out there and a reason for every man to decry the rom com genre. You can immediately taste the blend of this mess right from the word go.

    It starts out having a little bit of HEDWIG, adds a little a brain-dead best friend vibe from ROMY AND MICHELE’S HIGH SCHOOL REUNINION, has a pinch of HARD TO KILL, offers some elements of Bosom Buddies in reverse, apes from SISTER ACT and then adds a little David Duchovny seriousness into it all.

    I’m a sensitive guy. I appreciate a good David Duchovny love story. I happily own RETURN TO ME and can appreciate a middle-of-the-road love story for what it is. This, however, looks muddled and I am confused on what the most important element of the plot is supposed to be. Right away, though, I already know a few things:

    1. Connie and Carla do not die as a result of their “on the lam” status from the mob. There will be no chance in hell of that happening and so that immediately takes the suspense out of that plot thread. It would be nice if one of them happens to meet her demise by the end of the movie by having a Columbian necktie administered but having that ending would be tantamount to having Wile E. Coyote catching and eating the soft flesh of the Road Runner. It would throw the world off its axis.

    2. David Duchovny will most likely get pissed when he finds out his love interest is really a lady and not a dude and why the hell couldn’t she have been honest, but will eventually love her anyway because she’s, like, a really amazing person, et al.

    3. Connie and Carla will be best friends 4 ever. No matter what this movie says to you, or will have you believe, no matter how many red herrings are tossed in the other direction, they will be best friends by the time the film hits the last scene of the last reel.

    Now, knowing all this, and knowing full where it is all going, will some of the ladies still drag your ass to see this? You bet they’re gonna try. When you piece together the elements that pervade this trailer so heavily, from the lackadaisical direction, inane plot and substandard acting there is a thin, silver lining. It comes in the form of Toni Collette and David Duchovny.

    The two of them are good actors. Toni was absolutely splendid in JAPANESE STORY and David, from what I hear, brought it to the table every week when he was still on the X-Files. Nia Vardolos, apart from her really nice sounding name, has no currency with me. MY BIG FAT GREEK WEDDING was a nice movie the first time I saw it. She was good. I am anxious to know, however, if she can break out of the role of the Greek girl next door but this looks like a safe role choice for her and it feels like MY BIG FAT REDUX when I see her doing her shtick.

    HERO (2004)

    Director: Zhang Yimou
    Cast: Jet Li, Tony Leung Chiu-Wai, Maggie Cheung Man-Yuk, Zhang Ziyi, Chen Dao Ming, Donnie Yen
    Release: June 4, 2004 (limited)
    Synopsis: In ancient times China was divided into seven kingdoms. Qin, the king of the northern province, is under permanent threat of assassination attempts. His greatest fears are the warriors Broken Sword (Leung Chiu Wai), Flying Snow (Cheung), and Sky (Yen). One day one of the magistrates (Li) of his kingdom enters the palace, claims that he defeated all three of the emperor’s adversaries and tells his story; how he beat “Sky” in a duel and used the love between “Broken Sword” and “Flying Snow” to subdue them.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (QuickTime)

    * Small (Windows Media)

    Progonosis: Daaamn.

    Before any of us knew how to differentiate between good and bad movies there was just something unexplainable, truly magical, if you will allow me to be so loose with my adverbial phraseology, about the ones that stay with you regardless of their quality.

    Something I noticed immediately upon watching HERO was its ability to transcend language and offer up a story, while wonderfully intricate, didn’t really need words; the movie, and its players, was operatic. But that’s not the point here. This is about the trailer.

    There is a vast disconnect between the foreign language trailer and the one that has been cobbled together for the domestic release. The most glaring difference between the two is that the foreign language trailer uses, well, language to sell its film while the one for English speaking folk get a lot of the action as a substitute for exposition. That’s not to say one is better than the other, however. For many campaigns of foreign language films, WITH A FRIEND LIKE HARRY comes to mind immediately, the trailer is all action with none of the cast speaking a bit of their foreign tongue. Having a blend of both language and imagery worked well for a trailer like GOOD BYE, LENIN!, but it doesn’t fare well for the subtitled one offered up here.

    There could be a pissing match for days about what seems to be the most dominant element that needs to be accentuated in order to sell this to a domestic audience. Whether that be the story (nothing matters more), the visuals (an easy lock for the late teen/early adult demographic) or to try and tout the star power of Li, Leung and Ziyi (most would say “who?”) there are a lot of options to effectively sell this to ma and pa America. While the foreign language trailer focuses on the intimate connections between the characters, there is something there at the very end that I wish, terribly so, in fact, was in the domestic trailer. Near the very end there is a shot of an army releasing a cavalcade of arrows (not one on fire, dammit). It’s beautiful. The use of black and grey is breathtaking as they take flight. And then, there he is, Jet Li. We only see his back, the shower descending downward toward him, as he stands steadfast and still. That’s a keeper.

    The domestic trailer is no slouch, however. It showcases only a sliver of the action that’s contained in this epic and does a very good job in doing so. One of the things that really captured my attention is its focus on Yimou’s direction. There are wide, sweeping views interlaced with the emotions of the movie’s characters. There are wide shots interspersed with tight ones, action mixed with slow motion and a voiceover that assists, not hinders, the progression of the trailer.

    Miramax has been sitting on this movie for a long time and, simply based on the look of both these trailers, I am positive there should be a collective “why?” being uttered when the screen goes black. There simply isn’t a better looking import that hasn’t yet been released in the States than HERO. From what I have read, however, Quentin Tarantino is getting involved with getting this movie out and uncut. It’s a disgrace to any filmmaker to have their vision conform to an individual’s taste and this is but one example of there being hope for at least one movie that can have a stay of execution.

    March 19, 2004

    Trailer Park: And That’s A Good Thing

    Filed under: Columns,Trailer Park — admin @ 2:37 am

    E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES

    By Christopher Stipp

    March 19, 2004

    AND THAT’S A GOOD THING

    I am reminded of Martha and her catchphrase she uttered with resounding conviction, before her conviction, when I see the early reviews coming in for DAWN OF THE DEAD. On top of that, getting an extended ten-minute preview on USA this week was all that was needed to seal the deal. I applaud Universal for not only taking the ballsy move to secure the time to show the first ten minutes of the film, but that they believe enough in the picture to even give a thought to doing something like this. Obviously, there are some drawbacks to showing an insight into the pacing, cadence, camera work and acting of those in the picture. One of the drawbacks is that some people could see that you made a crappy-ass movie and you could possibly lose what little support you could have garnered by simply sitting on that jive turkey until a nameless Wednesday comes across so you can drop that bomb like Billy Zane in a Memphis Belle.

    Thankfully the suits at Universal felt safe in the knowledge that this looks like a solid horror hit. I realize there are purists out there who only reserve that moniker to the original HALLOWEEN series, the Chucky collection or even the various chapters of the CRITTERS saga, but this is horror in the new millennium. I would like to be scared, even jump a little in my seat, but if they can keep true to Romero’s larger themes of commercialization and what it says about the populace in general I will be happy enough to usher in this kind of gore.

    Now, about what I thought would be my trailer of the week. I didn’t even give it a second thought. I knew it. I had it in mind even before I pushed the play button on my QuickTime player. I, ROBOT was going to be the trailer that would get people talking and buzzing. And then I watched it.

    I am reminded of Michael Mann’s HEAT when Al Pacino is getting fed up with being dogged around by one of his informants. He walks away from the table they are speaking at and in disgust and rage he shouts out that his squealer shouldn’t waste his time in a tone and volume that I come back to what he said again and again, with the explicative attached, whenever I feel I’ve been jerked around. After watching the trailer I, too, had that very same thought as I backed away from my keyboard and wondered what the hell happened. Read on and find out what went wrong.

    In a surprise that not even I anticipated until early this week, I found the trailer for a movie called SHAUN OF THE DEAD. Priceless. It’s by far the best thing I saw all week. With the trailer enabled for Flash players (a great way to see a trailer quick and easy) many of you should be able and see for yourselves why I picked this baddie for clip of the week. Surely, if you happen to disagree or want to guide me to some trailers I may not know about, send me an e-mail. I always enjoy hearing from the literate.

    I, ROBOT (2004)

    Director: Alex Proyas
    Cast: Will Smith, Bridget Moynahan, Bruce Greenwood, James Cromwell, Chi McBride, Alan Tudyk
    Release: July 16, 2004
    Synopsis: Will Smith stars in this action thriller inspired by the classic short story collection by Isaac Asimov, and brought to the big screen by dynamic and visionary director Alex Proyas (Dark City, The Crow). In the year 2035, robots are an everyday household item, and everyone trusts them, except one, slightly paranoid detective (Smith) investigating what he alone believes is a crime perpetrated by a robot. The case leads him to discover a far more frightening threat to the human race. I, ROBOT uses a spectacular, state-of-the-art visual effects technique to bring a world of robots to life.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (QuickTime)
    * Various (Windows Media, RealOne)

    Progonosis: Negative.

    I would like to say where I think this trailer went in the direction I had hoped it wouldn’t, but I won’t be glib and say it happens as soon as Will Smith enters the frame.

    One of the first things that I noticed about this trailer, first of all, was the absence of Proyas’ cinematic thumbprint. GARAGE DAYS notwithstanding, I was excited to see him come back to the kind of gritty work that really made him a standout in DARK DAYS and THE CROW. Palpability or even a nuanced style is enough to make me notice in any director’s style, but Proyas had the ability of taking filmmaking elements and created worlds with them while giving an engaging, exciting story. The absence of all of that is was what alarmed me at first.

    The acting starts as Will Smith does a little of the pensive/GQ/serious “I’ll be right there” in his best cop-like persona, rides along on a motorcycle, weaving through traffic, off to an investigation of something, but by this point I’m not that ornery. I’m actually appreciating what might come next. I start feeling the wheels fall of this motorcade of a spectacle, however, when after a little banter between cop Smith and one of his investigative leads ends with a little indirect homophobic humor which, if done right, read here: PLANES, TRANES AND AUTOMOBILES, can be amusing, but when Smith lets his comments fly I can see where it’s leading.

    The trailer shows some very promising hope for life with Asimov’s Laws of Robotics as a backdrop, which, oddly enough, were crafted way back in the 1940s and provided a great basis for a flick when this project was first announced. When they scroll through the very same laws, and as Smith actually looks like he’s going to behave, an unseen robot defends his innocence under an interrogation. Up to this point I still believe there can be redemption. The sets look like they’re on loan from MINORITY REPORT, albeit in a very Styrofoam way.

    And then it happens.

    You get to see the face of the robot in question and there is a certain deflation of expectations after seeing the intricate posters that were made up showcasing these things leading up to this trailer’s arrival.

    It’s about this time when Smith says out loud that he longed for the good ol’ days when, “people were killed by other people.” Huh? The factitiousness of the movies visuals with the plastic sheen that coats everything just continues this movie’s nosedive. There are, however, a few shots of some robots going monkey shine on the human population, some quick frames of action with glass shattering (forever a fan of that) and cars flipping over, but it is Smith’s mugging that irked me the most. The movie moves from being, what could be, a great realizing of Asimov’s principals with Proyas leading the attack, no less, but it just looks like another vehicle for Smith to be, well, Smith in his most splendid MEN IN BLACK routine. Wake me up if I’m wrong about this one.

    THUNDERBIRDS (2004)

    Director: Jonathan Frakes
    Cast: Bill Paxton, Anthony Edwards, Sophia Myles, Brady Corbet, Soren Fulton, Vanessa Hudgens, Ben Kingsley
    Release: August 6, 2004
    Synopsis: When dangerous situations exceed the limitations of ordinary military and international security forces, the world calls upon the high-tech assistance of International Rescue-a mysterious band of fearless adventurers and their fleet of awesome, imaginatively engineered vehicles known as: Thunderbirds! Hidden from the world, Tracy Island, a lush patch of land situated in the remote waters of the South Pacific, is home to brilliant entrepreneur and former astronaut Jeff Tracy (Bill Paxton) and his five sons. It is also the headquarters of Tracy’s top-secret organization, International Rescue – and it is under siege. Master criminal The Hood (Ben Kingsley) has breached island security, intent on commandeering International Rescue’s fleet of five highly advanced rescue vehicles, each designed to accomplish a specific task. Deploying Jeff and his four eldest sons on a mission, The Hood finds his plans obstructed by Jeff’s youngest son Alan (Brady Corbet), who will do anything to save the Tracy family and the Thunderbirds.

    View Trailer:
    * Large (QuickTime)
    * Medium (QuickTime)
    * Small (QuickTime)


    Progonosis: Meh.

    With a cast like this I was feeling like I could get into a flick that I didn’t really care that much about. I had heard a little bit about it, had seen production designs for one of the cars that looked more suited for the Ambiguously Gay Duo and, frankly, I never even had an interest in the television series. This trailer, though, makes great use of camp in much the same way it wasn’t well used for the other blast from the past, LOST IN SPACE.

    To be honest, I both loved the trailer for its eye candy that came in all different flavors and also feared it for the lack of any dialogue that would offer any sense of how the actors were going to play their parts. From what little I could tell, Bill Paxton is all cleaned up from his FRAILITY persona and is chipper enough to declare with a grin that, “Thunderbirds are go.” Joy. I couldn’t be happier, either.

    The outfits the Thunderbirds wear are slightly odd looking along with their color coordinated ships/planes/Ambiguously gay flying machines. Just watching the trailer a few times had me queasy from motion sickness as the scenes cut from one moment to another in such a rapid fashion that, by the end, I had no idea what the hell was going on. That’s not to say, however, that is such a bad thing as when dealing with summer pictures you have to hit the attention deficient demographic with every last sensory blast you have, but it would be nice to know what is going on with the plot. So far, all I know is that this movie has Bill Paxton in it and there’s lots of explosions, smoke, a hot blonde chick with an English accent, and space ships that look like they’re exploding. That’s it.

    Now, for the rest of the population who want to decide if forking over their loot is worth it the filmmakers need to come correct with a better trailer with at least one of the three things:

    1. Some exposition. Please. Just give me a nugget, even a little somethin’ somethin’ with Sir Ben, which should tell me why I should patronize your summer popcorn love fest.
    2. Dialogue. Even something from that one guy who does all the action voiceovers for all the action movies saying a few words about why I should care about a defunct television series that expired decades ago would be nice.
    3. Show that hot blonde chick doing something ribald or tawdry with one of those space ship models and I will personally guarantee the highest opening weekend with males 12-24.

    It’s always good to see brother Chet doing something new, not the least of which was CLUB DREAD which was woefully given little love, and I would like to see how his presence either elevates or shames the rest of the cast assembled around him.

    THE UNITED STATES OF LELAND (2004)

    Director: Matthew Ryan Hoge
    Cast: Ryan Gosling, Don Cheadle, Chris Klein, Jena Malone, Lena Olin, Kevin Spacey, Michelle Williams, Martin Donovan, Ann Magnuson, Kerry Washington, Sherilyn Fenn, Maria Arcé, Michael Welch, Michael Pena
    Release: April 2, 2004
    Synopsis: Soft-spoken Leland Fitzgerald (Gosling) commits a crime that shocks the soul of his community. As the son of a world-renowned author (Spacey) and because his motive is a genuine mystery, the boy becomes a touchstone for controversy. In pursuing “the reason why”, aspiring writer Pearl Madison (Cheadle) see the chance for a career-making book. Leland’s haunting tale is, at once, deeply poignant and darkly funny, an investigation into the impenetrable secrets of the suburban American family. The film explores the resonance of a single violent act, showing how it affects the families of both the guilty and the innocent.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (QuickTime)

    Progonosis: Positive.

    There is something about a good movie with Don Cheadle that restores the notion that not everyone in Hollywood needs a paycheck that bad.

    Sure, his work as a bloke with a hellacious accent in OCEAN’S ELEVEN made me scratch my head too, but that doesn’t come close to negating his work in TRAFFIC, BOOGIE NIGHTS, THE METEOR MAN or even as the guy at the fast food pick-up window in MOVING VIOLATIONS.

    His last real project was OCEAN’S but he looks great in this trailer alongside Ryan Gosling. Gosling has a quiet ferociousness about himself, as evidenced in movies like THE SLAUGHTER RULE and THE BELIEVER, and that comes across as he effortlessly glides across the screen in the newest project from the man who brought us, well, nothing. A real first-time director in the eyes of most people, Hoge brings warmth and some slivers of inspired cinematography in this short trailer.

    The trailer opens up with a soft, Ben Folds-esque piano solo and it works so well. While the music plays we get a little backstory about why young Leland is in the pokey but it’s not too clear of the specifics. We get a little bit of Cheadle, and even a little Chris Klein, who gets a moment to add something quietly to the picture this trailer paints. The trailer takes its time and that’s fine. It works.

    Jenna Malone, who was showcased last week for SAVED!, pops up again as the love interest for Leland, and there is something very sweet that comes across when her and Gosling have their moments together. Kevin Spacey decides to make a landing in this bad boy and I am hoping he found his box full of acting tricks that he managed to lose sometime in late 1999. There are other smaller bits from established bards, but, overall, this movie looks great. Judging by the production company that has helped to get this thing made, REQUIEM FOR A DREAM being one of them, the hands that this movie is in are ones that aren’t necessarily out to bust box office records but out to simply create a well-crafted film.

    GRAND THEFT PARSONS (2004)

    Director: David Caffrey
    Cast: Johnny Knoxville, Gabriel Macht, Marley Shelton, Christina Applegate, Michael Shannon, Robert Forster, Jim Cody Williams
    Release: ?
    Synopsis: There are times when it’s right and proper to simply bury the dead. This is not one of those times… Gram Parsons was one of the most influential musicians of his time; a bitter, brilliant, genius who knew Elvis, tripped with the Stones and fatally overdosed on morphine and tequila in 1973. And from his dying came a story. A story from deep within folklore; a story of friendship, honour and adventure; a story so extraordinary that if it didn’t really happen, no one would believe it. Two men, a hearse, a dead rock star, five gallons of petrol, and a promise. And the most extraordinary chase of modern times.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (Windows Media)

    Progonosis: Positive Sometimes it’s all in how you define independent.

    Is it by the budget or by the ideas behind the story or something else entirely? I didn’t expect much out of Johnny Knoxville as an actor but he really shines in the parts that are presented in this trailer. What’s refreshing, as well, is how the director for DIVORCING JACK (A movie that has a disturbingly creepy box cover that seems to follow my eyes whenever I see it at the local video mart) uses Knoxville so effectively. I’m not so sure, or convinced, of Knoxville’s accent in this film, but I am pleased to see him seem so comfortable in front of the camera.

    As this trailer opens, the scroll letting us know this is based on a true story, there is a certain amount of emotional weight to Knoxville’s voiceover. The camera work is nice in how it eases us into the world these characters inhabit. As Knoxville encounters resistance to claiming Parson’s body at the hospital where it is being kept, in an effort to cremate it, it sets up the crux of the movie’s plot beautifully. Cut and dry. Pure and simple. All in less than fifteen seconds.

    Christina Applegate, in an effort to recapture the magic she had with DON’T TELL MOM THE BABYSITTER’S DEAD, looks very pleasing and actually appears to add an ephemeral counter-balance to Knoxville’s scruffy, burnt-out character.

    Another thing this movie has going for it is that this movie could have gone in two different directions. They could have made a tender story about a man who looks to fulfill a promise to a dead friend and have it a rather touching story of the bonds men share or they could have went down this route, throw in a dash of serious contemplation about the nature of friendship, and play down the more supercilious aspects to have Knoxville pump up the comedy a bit. The latter is what this trailer is selling and if it is any different I am not too sure it would really make that much a difference based on the clips provided here.

    I made note of how the story is essentially told in the first few moments of the trailer and I think it is worth noting, again, because it does something very nice. It allows an individual to better observe what is happening on the screen and it frees someone from having to piece together a puzzle of a trailer that looks only to shock and awe. As well, someone can enjoy the performances from the actors on screen and really make an honest value judgment if they want to come spend their money. I wish more trailers could learn this lesson.

    SHAUN OF THE DEAD (2004)

    Director: Edgar Wright
    Cast: Simon Pegg, Nick Frost, Kate Ashfield, Dylan Moran, Lucy Davis, Bill Nighy, Peter Serafinowicz, Penelope Wilton
    Release: TBD
    Synopsis: Gathered together at their local pub for a night of drinking and conversation, a group of friends find themselves thrown into a battle against hell-bent zombies.

    View Trailer:
    * Shockwave Flash

    Progonosis: O Positive.

    I’m a consummate Todd Phillips fan, but I had more laughs during this trailer than I did when I viewed the one cobbled together for STARSKY AND HUTCH.

    One of the things about comedies is that you don’t quite know what’s going to be funny when it’s taken out of context and put into the kind of sound bites that make it into the trailer. I thought, simply based on the trailer, STARSKY was going to be a laugh a minute comedic journey. What I got, instead, was a short bus ride after seeing most every comedic moment of the film was used for the trailer. That’s why, with slight trepidation, I see SHAUN OF THE DEAD as one of the most anticipated comedies that I would like to see simply based on what’s presented here.

    It’s great to see good satire when it’s done right and all the elements seem to be in place here. There’s a great false beginning to this trailer where a concerned television reporter tells the populace to be calm as video of walking zombies fill the picture screen. Just as the reporter says this two couch potatoes, who will be the movie’s titular characters, realize what the newsman is saying and in walks a zombie. Hilarity ensues. It’s hard to describe comedic elements without it sounding unfunny and it’s best explained if you see it for yourself. Again, subjectivity is the root of all comedy. What’s funny for one could be an excruciatingly miserable experience for another.

    After the intro, there’s the voiceover from above that gives the basic rundown of how to escape a zombie invasion. The first way is to avoid detection and so cue cell phone; the second is to use weapons as the protagonists open a box of records to be used as vinyl instruments of death as the zombies come closer and they start debating which ones should be saved; and lastly, as the newscaster says it, “the attackers can be stopped by removing the head.” The physical humor just kicks up from there. The ending to this thing sees a zombie being knocked over by a car the characters are driving

    There’s not really any better way to say it but this has to be one of the funniest trailers I’ve seen, so far, all year. Does that make me a shut-in who needs to get out more? Possibly. It’s all subjective.

    March 12, 2004

    Trailer Park: Getting Warmer

    Filed under: Columns,Trailer Park — admin @ 2:38 am

    E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES

    By Christopher Stipp

    March 12, 2004

    GETTING WARMER

    It’s nice to see the studios start rolling out and unfurling the trailers for their tentpoles. While I have yet to see the ones for I, ROBOT or the new SPIDER-MAN 2 be released, I know it’s just a matter of time as the latest for HELLBOY, MAN ON FIRE and even a new ALIENS VS. PREDATOR debuted this week. It’s nice to be coming out of winter and looking ahead to the cool confines of the movie house and unplug. Some have their feelings about summer movies and about their place in modern cinema, but if you take a look at my trailer-o-the-week, DAY AFTER TOMORROW, you will see why it may be a good thing to be paying attention at this year’s crop of summer flicks.

    I won’t bother you with a needless rant, as there really isn’t anyone to pick on this week, but I will say thank you to all those who sent in their thoughts about PIZZA: THE MOVIE. There were some shining comments from a few of you and I have encapsulated the majority of them below. For redundancy purposes, I intentionally kept it to the two comments that were indicative of the whole. It’s good to see small filmmakers putting it up for those to judge and I hope if there is a movie project that needs some pimping and you’d like the world to know, e-mail me.

    Oh, lest I forget, if you find some downtime this week and want to see what the hell the rest of the world is up to in terms of film, check out Apple.com’s QuickTime and look for a film by the name of CASSHERN. I have no clue what they’re saying, I have no idea what is going on, and I have an even lesser handle on what the movie’s about but there is something happening in that trailer that makes me wish I studied Japanese in high school and college instead of knowing how to ask for the location of a bathroom at my local Chi-Chi’s. If any of you out there can translate it, I would love to know what this movie is all about. It’s probably why I gave a little love to SHAOLIN SOCCER. The movie deserves it as much as you do in checking it out.

    PIZZA: THE MOVIE (2004)

    Director/Writer: Donald Gregory
    Cast: Craig Wisniewski, Jason Muzie, Daniela Mangialardo, Alex Aco Adzioski, Eva Conrad, Sharon Stookey, Thadeous Pudlik
    Release: May 29, 2004
    Synopsis: Three years after graduating, Kevin Miller’s crush on a girl from high school has kept him from moving on with his life. When she shows up in town on break from college, he realizes this might just be his last chance ever to win her heart, only she doesn’t even remember him. His bizarre, sometimes annoying, and generally unhelpful best friend hatches a scheme to get them together. But for it to work, Kevin will have to give up his comfortable boring life and step into the crazy world of pizza delivery.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (QuickTime)
    * Medium (QuickTime)
    * Large (QuickTime)

    Progonosis: Conflicted.

    After numerous and, at times, humorous, lamentations on the movie trailer for this film, I have culled together the most astute critiques on this movie; that would be a sum of two critiques, however, as it represents the exact number of reviews from people who took the time to cobble one together. Kudos to you, sir and madam. I have seen ads for this movie on a few different sites and so it’s nice to see that this effort is getting an advertorial push from the filmmakers admonishing me to check the film out. While judging from the following opinions about the flick may be a little on the unflattering side but I can see exactly where they’re coming from. If you get a chance, have a quick look for yourself and see if these two people are even on target.

    Theron N. says:
    “Prognosis: Depends on the viewer. From the trailer, it’s clear that this movie suffers from all that is good and bad about low-budget independent films from inexperienced screenwriters and filmmakers. Most people will see the low production values and hear the precious dialogue delivered stiltedly and tune out. Others will see and hear the same things and breathe a sigh of relief and think, “Thank God, something that’s pure and funny from someone who cares about more than product, units sold and profit margins.” You know who you are…”

    Buck is a little more blunt when he adds:
    “After sitting through a horrendous, unredeemable small independent film last year, in an easy genre at that, I have no slack for these things. If there’s some goodness to be had, it better be obvious.

    Sound track ““ passable
    Lighting – passable, for a small film
    Writing ““ hackneyed
    Timing ““ poor
    Acting – mediocre to bad
    Comedy value – 1 out of 10
    Worst moment – either ripping off Chris Rock’s old man bit, or the fact that the title’s true relation to the actual content of the trailer is desperation.

    We made a poor romantic comedy, with bad acting, and now we need to tie in some other theme from the script…uh…uh…I know! Pizza! We ate some! We’ll film a couple more pizza scenes!

    Why, desperate film-makers? Why torture yourselves?”

    While I wasn’t necessarily sold on buying the movie outright, as that’s how it is going to make its way into circulation, you have to at least respect the effort. Outside of that, however, the trailer has its moments where I am actually interested in knowing more. Now, if there were more of those moments I would actually rebuke Buck, but he’s right on a few levels.

    Saved! (2004)

    Director: Brian Dannelly
    Cast: Jena Malone, Mandy Moore, Macaulay Culkin, Patrick Fugit, Heather Matarazzo, Eva Amuri, Martin Donovan, Mary-Louise Parker
    Release: April 9, 2004
    Synopsis: Good girl Mary (Jena Malone) can’t believe it when she gets pregnant by her newly-gay boyfriend. She also can’t believe the actions of her popular, relentlessly devout best friend, Hilary Faye (Mandy Moore), who’s looking after her wheelchair-bound brother Roland (Macaulay Culkin), attempting to convert adamantly Jewish Cassandra (Eva Amurri), and trying to snag cute newcomer Patrick (Patrick Fugit), a hip skateboarding missionary. By the time Mary’s secret is revealed, Hilary Faye has gone to extremes to get the outsiders expelled from school, with spectacular results, and Mary is forced to decide what’s worth believing in the first place. In this dark comedy, a young, talented cast comes together to get Saved.

    View Trailer:
    “¢ Small (Windows Media, RealOne, QuickTime)“¢

    Progonosis: What would Jesus say?

    Where would we be without the teenage comedy in our cinematic arsenal?

    Now, while most seek to place the next “it” actor/actress in a project, this trailer, from the beginning, explodes with something that seeks to take the teen genre in a more introspective direction. Dealing with issues of religion and conformity as it pertains to the youth sect SAVED! looks to take on some of the very same issues of spirituality in a time of teenage angst that FOOTLOOSE did in the early eighties. Although, there’s no dancing Kevin Bacon going ape shit and getting all musky in a warehouse or even a Chris Penn looking like a hapless moron that needs a good beat down with a tire iron. No, here you get Mandy Moore, looking just as good, if not better, than her wicked stepsister, Jessica Simpson, as she effortlessly passes as a God-fearing young woman at a Christian high school who is looking to spread the good word of the Lord to the youth.

    From the beginning, and just moments before we get a good gander at Mandy getting sweaty in gym class, we get a peek at where-the-hell-has-he-been Patrick Fugit and Macaulay Culkin, who is bound to a wheelchair. I have yet to see Macaulay’s big screen return, PARTY MONSTER, which was his first after a nine-year hiatus from the silver screen but it looks like this may be the film where I might actually willingly can see what a nine year hiatus from the silver screen can do to an actor. It’s probably wrong to take so much pleasure in the possibility for a moment of schadenfreude, to maybe see how much his star has burned out, but I am hopeful he has some of that same charm as he did so long ago. Patrick Fugit, on the other hand, looking very Michael Kelso, is someone else I haven’t seen for a little while and am just as curious to know if ALMOST FAMOUS wasn’t just a fluke for this kid. He was certainly better to watch than Goldie Hawn’s daughter, thou shall never speak of that evil directly, and I was disappointed for a while that he didn’t do/get picked to star in anything else for a period of time.

    So, after the players are established in this trailer we get some of the movie and what it’s all about. There is some lustful, teenage urgings, some catfight-ery, a little bit of genuine emotion and a very engaging set of supporting characters. No one seems to be doing something completely irrelevant to the point of selling this film. Although, and this next statement goes to any creator of any trailer, and I didn’t think I would have to bring this up, but since some of you can’t seem to grow up beyond second grade, here it is: when a character makes a misstep or a piece of information is so important that you want to get an audience’s attention it is not necessary to always have the sound of a needle being dragged over a vinyl LP as an exclamation mark. Soon, most the kids you’re selling this to aren’t going to know what the hell that sound is and where the hell will you be then?

    SAVED! ends on a nice note and it’s something I would immediately recommend to young’uns in lieu of THE PRINCE AND ME. Just because teens are youthful doesn’t mean they need, or necessarily want, a diet of crap cinema. Most do, but this movie looks like something the drama and art nerds (A side note to the youth: Morrissey is not a god and Robert Smith sold his soul to the devil when HP came a-knockin.’). Take it for what you will but the trailer lingers for a bit after you’ve seen it and that’s a good thing.

    LAWS OF ATTRACTION (2004)

    Director: Peter Howitt
    Cast: Pierce Brosnan, Julianne Moore, Parker Posey, Michael Sheen, Frances Fisher, Nora Dunn
    Release: April 30, 2004
    Synopsis: Maybe getting married first is the best way to fall in love. As divorce attorneys, Audrey (Moore) and Daniel (Brosnan) have seen love gone wrong in all its worst case scenarios. So, how bad could their chances be?

    View Trailer:
    * Small (QuickTime)
    * Medium (QuickTime)
    * Large (QuickTime)
    * Small (Flash)

    Progonosis: Your parents will like this. I liked THE THOMAS CROWN AFFAIR.

    I am a big fan of Pierce Brosnan and believe he has a good combination of actual acting ability and a great physical form that the ladies seem to really go for. (Although, and this is just dude to dude, he could use a serious waxing.) When you look back on his list of film credits in the past 15 or so years, the man has been involved with a lot of television and some really hit or miss movies. He made his mark as Remington Steele and he’s been a good switch hitter ever since between small and big screen.

    This leads me into the dissection of THE LAWS OF ATTRACTION which sees him paired up with Julianne Moore who I first saw, I mean really saw, in Robert Altman’s SHORT CUTS way back in ’93. The two of them here, whether you choose to believe me or not, appear to really work well together.

    As the Boomers get older and seem to be marginalized in much the same way as kiddies and families do, it’s nice to be able and have them enjoy some lighthearted fare when not being pushed and shoved out of the way as the big actioneer in the theater next door bleeds its audio into the surrounding theaters. What is of interest to me here is that Pierce seems to be playing a doltish oaf and not the self-same dashing leading man he has played to death in his other roles. Whenever I recall any of his other humorous moments I am reminded of MRS. DOUBTFIRE and, while not a cinematic benchmark, it did give Pierce a moment to show that he could be funny in an indirect way.

    Julianne Moore, however, seems to be stretching a bit in this role. She plays a brash and hard-edged divorce lawyer who seems to spurn every man she meets until she realizes that what she really wants is a man who is her antithesis. Great. Now if they could only bottle the same formula for the common cold that would be something to crow about. I would go on about what she does in this trailer, but it would be a waste. Just envision every chick flick you’ve ever seen where an oil/vinegar relationship gets mixed in and there you go. Just add and stir.

    Look, I am not blind to the fact that this trailer basically gives you the set-up, the crisis of the plot and its dénouement in full Technicolor but there is a time and place for these kinds of movies; as such, you should plan accordingly. Cinema shouldn’t always be about elevating the mind. There are moments when you want to read the funnies instead of doing the crossword puzzle. When you want to unplug and watch Most Extreme Elimination Challenge instead of watching Frontline. For every IN THE MOOD FOR LOVE there is a NOTTING HILL just waiting to do its part.

    SHAOLIN SOCCER (2003)

    Director: Stephen Chow
    Cast: Stephen Chow, Ng Mang-Tat, Li Hui, Zhou Wei
    Release: March 26, 2004
    Synopsis: Shaolin was an art practiced through the ages; a skill mastered in the heart. In SHAOLIN SOCCER, it is so much more than a philosophy for six young believers. It is a complete way of life. But as the world changed around them, and Honor and Discipline become forgotten virtues, they lose their way –except for one loyal follower, Sing (Chow). With the help of a former soccer star, he reunites his old, out of shape, misfit friends, and recruits a young woman with extraordinary Kung Fu skills. Together, they’re out to combine the ancient power of Shaolin with the modern game of soccer and in the process, just might take the world’s most popular sport to its most extreme.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (QuickTime)
    * Various (Windows Media, RealPlayer)

    Progonosis: About F*ckin’ Time.

    Right away, there’s some Shaolin ass-kicking going on and you can never go wrong when you start things off on this kind of foot. I can start by ranting against the preposterous reasons why this film has seen its release date shoved back more times than Star Jones at a salad bar, I mean check out the official site. They have this movie listed as coming out on August 15. What in the hell is that all about? I could go on but this is all about the trailer.

    In a wonderful and aesthetically pleasing directorial effort, Stephen Chow has brought a film about martial artists playing soccer players playing other martial artists playing soccer players to new heights. Obviously, there has only been the one height but with a film that could have easily been one that could’ve sat deep in the foreign film bin mixed with the other imports from Hong Kong with covers that riff on nearly every other good import Stephen brings something very unique to the cinematic canon.

    “”¦Except for one.” I love that. I always dig it, in any kind of movie, where there’s one person who is the impetus for a chemical reaction that sets the action in motion. They may do it horribly, be absolutely cringe inducing to see it executed, but when done right it is a pleasure to behold. I just have to believe, just by seeing the trailer, that Chow has the right idea.

    What else I can see of Chow’s style is the John Woo influenced slo-mo’s of people walking with their nice suits and ties flapping like harbingers of toughness and not the articles of annoyance they are when you’re trying to hold them down. While it’s visually distracting it has nothing on the blazingly quick cut scenes that are employed to sell the movie. I realize, yes, that this is a foreign film and you really can’t show the people talk lest it’s dubbed or quickly subtitled because you’re trying to sell this movie to a lot of different but screw that. GOODBYE, LENIN! did the same damn thing with its culling from the moments of the film where not a lot of people were speaking but it did use subtitles and it did not change the way I felt about wanting to pay to see the movie. The trailer for SHAOLIN SOCCER, though, uses some great moments to showcase its strength as a worthy import to watch and I am positive there was much more where that came from. Using a tagline that says “get ready to Kick Some Grass” is something that would’ve sent me into the theater circa 1982 when I was barely able to comprehend the English language but I just can’t help feeling a deep sense of resignation at how awful this movie has been presented to the American public. You can even buy the damn movie, although many stateside retailers have been delicately asked by Miramax to stop, but what’s stopping me, so far, is that when you see a trailer like this it just makes you want to see it up on a really big screen in all its splendid magic.

    THE DAY AFTER TOMORROW (2004)

    Director: Roland Emmerich
    Cast: Dennis Quaid, Jake Gyllenhaal, Emmy Rossum, Sela Ward, Arjay Smith, Tamlyn Tomita, Austin Nichols
    Release: May 28, 2004
    Synopsis: Dennis Quaid plays a climatologist who tries to figure out a way to save the world from abrupt global warming. He must get to his young son (Gyllenhaal) in New York, which is being taken over by a new ice age. Emmy Rossum co-stars as the love interest of Jake Gyllenhaal’s character, a member of an academic decathlon team.

    View Trailer:
    * Small (QuickTime)
    * Medium (QuickTime)* Large (QuickTime)

    Progonosis: Positive.

    Roland Emmerich. The name can conjure up images of aliens and Mel Gibson in a more innocent time in his career. In others, it can produce a vile torrent of obscenities as it pertains to his choices of projects and their big dollar sticker price and their simpleton taste. They’re right on both as I enjoyed INDEPENDENCE DAY with great popcorn delight and avoided GODZILLA which was a stink bomb that I avoided with the grace of a matador. I mean really, let’s take a good look at that one. There was more merchandising that was, quite literally, whored like it was going to be the next big thing and enough talk about how they weren’t showing the entire lizard king to generate buzz that it was doomed from the words, “yeah, that’s a great marketing plan.”

    Since then Herr Emmerich went back to summer epics with a better eye for what works and he gave us THE PATRIOT. While not necessarily something you can merchandise with action figures (Make the turncoats run in terror! Your musket ball rifle shoots real balls of fire as you lodge metal balls into your archenemies’ scrotum! Now with Kung-Fu grip and scurvy!), he learned a lesson or two from his previous outings. That’s where THE DAY AFTER TOMORROW comes in.

    Again, while not your average summer picture, there is an element that the movie has to work as a film if it expects to generate some income. The previous incarnation of this trailer was a wonder to watch and this one is just pure icing on this Betty Crocker dessert treat. It starts off with such delicacy that I am reminded of UNBREAKABLE which really took its time with putting forth the plot. When you see this trailer you can almost feel the water that is being held back behind this dam.

    We get to see Donny Darko himself make an entrance into this version of the trailer as does Dennis Quaid. Dennis Quaid? Does he still make movies? Is he still allowed? The last one I can quickly rattle off on the top of my head, no joke, is INNERSPACE. I know he has since done some good work in TRAFFIC and FAR FROM HEAVEN, but man, I hope he’s as good as the trailer. But, don’t confuse flattery with complete lust for the film.

    It has the feel, as well, of an ARMAGEDDON or even a DEEP IMPACT. I’m sure someone here has seen either of these two. I was suckered into seeing both. So, what is one to make of another movie that shows the “total destruction of humanity?” I don’t know the answer to this but I am more inclined to give this film a chance than I am, say, another one made by Mimi Leder. Fool me once”¦

    Some of the best parts of the trailer are what I feel make a great trailer: a hint of some plot, some bombastic speech that usually includes the line “if we don’t some action now”¦,” and some frenetic cut scenes. A great moment in the trailer here is when one of the guys, who I am not real sure I know very well as an actor, and, thus, is most likely to die somewhere near the middle or end, says of a thunderstorm that it has been, “raining like this for three days now.” That’s completely cool. Kind of gets the hairs to rise on the neck. From there it’s all unrelated moments, slapped together in no particular order, and pasted with a great trailer score.

    This is one is close to being a benchmark for what trailers should do and look like, but there is just something that it has to prove, that it can be better than all of the other end of days movies, before it can hold its place as a movie worthy enough to be played again and again without feeling like you’ve been sold solely on clever advertising.

    « Newer PostsOlder Posts »

    Powered by WordPress