Tag: ken plume

  • Ken P. D. Snyde-Cast #70: The Lullaby Of Broadway

    snydecast-header.png

    snydecast-logo2.png

    Adult Swim’s Dana Snyder and FRED’s Ken Plume set out to have a literate conversation between two pals, but inevitably devolve into a verbal, and funny, free-for-all full of bickering, infighting, and the special kind of male bonding that comes from conflict expressed through the podcast medium.

    Actor/comedian/raconteur Dana Snyder, you’re certainly aware, is Aqua Teen Hunger Force’s Master Shake, Squidbillies‘ Granny, Minoriteam’s Dr. Wang, and The Venture Bros.‘ Alchemist. Available for weddings and bar mitzvahs (bat availability pending), you can keep tabs on him via his website, www.eyeofthesnyder.com.

    Ken Plume is the editor-in-chief here at FRED. He is a friend of Dana’s, as well as his arch-nemesis.

    VISIT THE SNYDECAST EXPERIENCE

    linesm.gif

    KEN P.D. SNYDECAST #70: The Lullaby Of Broadway – Ken returns sans an out-of-town Dana, so co-hosting duties are once again performed by very special guest Paul Sabourin, as the near-dynamic duo discuss musical theater, band nerds, betrayal, bosoms, and more.

    [CONTENT WARNING]: This podcast may contain some foul language and horribly off-color jokes. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

    DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
    Episode #70 (MP3 format)

    [audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/snydecast/ken_p_d_snyde_cast-70.mp3]

    SUBSCRIBE
    Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

    Got something to say? E-mail Dana & Ken at the Snydecast mailbag.

    line.gif

    CLICK HERE FOR THE SNYDECAST ARCHIVES

    line.gif

    ##

  • Ken P. D. Snyde-Cast #69: One Fish Two Fish

    snydecast-header.png

    snydecast-logo2.png

    Adult Swim’s Dana Snyder and FRED’s Ken Plume set out to have a literate conversation between two pals, but inevitably devolve into a verbal, and funny, free-for-all full of bickering, infighting, and the special kind of male bonding that comes from conflict expressed through the podcast medium.

    Actor/comedian/raconteur Dana Snyder, you’re certainly aware, is Aqua Teen Hunger Force’s Master Shake, Squidbillies‘ Granny, Minoriteam’s Dr. Wang, and The Venture Bros.‘ Alchemist. Available for weddings and bar mitzvahs (bat availability pending), you can keep tabs on him via his website, www.eyeofthesnyder.com.

    Ken Plume is the editor-in-chief here at FRED. He is a friend of Dana’s, as well as his arch-nemesis.

    VISIT THE SNYDECAST EXPERIENCE

    linesm.gif

    KEN P.D. SNYDECAST #69: One Fish Two Fish – Ken & Dana return from the sonic wilderness with tales of mass fish ingestion, the power of dramamine, Kenny vs. Spenny, and the disappointment of a Whatnot.

    [CONTENT WARNING]: This podcast may contain some foul language and horribly off-color jokes. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

    DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
    Episode #69 (MP3 format)

    [audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/snydecast/ken_p_d_snyde_cast-69.mp3]

    SUBSCRIBE
    Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

    Got something to say? E-mail Dana & Ken at the Snydecast mailbag.

    line.gif

    CLICK HERE FOR THE SNYDECAST ARCHIVES

    line.gif

    ##

  • Interview: Ricky Gervais

    ricky-01.jpg

    -by Ken Plume

    Ricky Gervais, along with Stephen Merchant, is the co-creator of both the original British and American versions of The Office and two series of the BBC/HBO hit Extras, as well co-host of the most downloaded podcast in history.

    He’s written an episode of The Simpsons, performed a trio of sold-out stand-up tours (all of which have been released on DVD in the UK as Animals, Politics, & Fame), co-starred in A Night At The Museum & For Your Consideration, written a series of Flanimals books for children, and won more awards than you can shake a stick at. He also fronted the big Hollywood flick Ghost Town and makes his big screen directorial debut with next year’s This Side Of The Truth.

    On Saturday, November 15th, he brings his US stand-up tour to HBO in the form of Ricky Gervais: Out Of England, airing at 9pm EST.

    I’ve spoken with Gervais more times than I can shake that aforementioned virtual stick at, and this is our latest…

    lucyline.gif

    KP: I was just looking over my records and this is actually the fourth time that I’ve done an in-depth piece with you…

    GERVAIS: Wow. Wow. There you go. Cool. I’ve got nothing new to tell you.

    KP: And not once have you interviewed me. I’m kind of hurt about that.

    GERVAIS: Well, we’ll do a mutual one. I’ll start. What’s the best interview you’ve ever done with me?

    KP: I think it would probably be the second one.

    GERVAIS: (laughs)

    KP: The nerves were kind of gone. You were successful but not quite as successful as you would eventually become.

    GERVAIS: So still humble.

    KP: You still had that touch of humility…

    GERVAIS: No… Now I know you’re lying, because I’ve always been an arrogant swine. Even when I was a nobody.

    KP: You covered it really well early on, though.

    GERVAIS: Okay.

    KP: It wasn’t until after Extras that really you just said, “Fuck it all.” Then all the pretense was gone.

    GERVAIS: I know. Exactly. I might as well just admit it.

    KP: But it was a beautiful point.

    GERVAIS: Lovely.

    KP: Now, though, I’m sure this is going to be a complete disaster.

    GERVAIS: Yeah, but that’s your job – to make it look good.

    KP: And I promise I will try my best.

    GERVAIS: All I do is give you one revelation.

    KP: Oh, I get one?

    GERVAIS: Yeah.

    KP: I like the fact that you’re parceling them out now.

    GERVAIS: The reason I’ll never box again is because I killed a man. That’s not true. I’ll have to make something up to be exciting. Look, I’ll tell you what; we’ll stick to the truth and you make it look exciting.

    KP: You should just throw out the name of a minor UK celebrity that I’ll never follow up on.

    GERVAIS: (laughs) Yeah. Oh dear.

    KP: Or you killed Bill Oddie.

    GERVAIS: Hey! Now there’s a reference.

    KP: You took out at least one of the Goodies.

    GERVAIS: Yeah! (laughs)

    KP: As part of your long, ongoing Goodie feud.

    GERVAIS: I knocked them off their bike.

    KP: Yes, yes. While they were doing the funky gibbon.

    GERVAIS: Wow. Well, that’s more than most British people know.

    KP: Probably with good reason.

    GERVAIS: You just summed up the Goodies.

    KP: Yes. A bike and a funky gibbon. And being knocked off something at some point.

    GERVAIS: (laughs)

    KP: I guess the big news since we last talked was that you finally took the plunge and tried to conquer the US.

    GERVAIS: Well, I don’t know if I’ve ever taken a plunge. It’s sort of been drip feeding. But they had The Office on BBC America, and then the Golden Globes helped a little bit – and then, you know, Extras on cable, but I think it’s that nice sort of cult thing. The right people are aware of you and the offers came in and I took a few little cameos. Obviously with Christopher Guest. He’s a comedy hero. Ben Stiller, I’d worked with him on Extras. I returned the favor there. And we know what happened with Night At The Museum. I think it made about 800 million dollars or something. That was fun. I only got half of that, obviously.

    KP: That’s why you’re now on your third agent.

    GERVAIS: (laughs) And I did a film called Stardust to work with De Niro. I got him in Extras. So yeah, I need more than one reason to do a film. And Ghost Town, there was loads of reasons. It was the funniest script I’d read. It was really collaborative. It was just my sort of role. It was that sort of unsympathetic sort of smart assed curmudgeon, and it had some redemption – which is one of my favorite themes now. But I’ve never really done things to up my profile or further my career. I’ve done things that were fun and were right. And I probably turned down some things that were fun and were right, but I was busy on other things that were more fun and more right.

    KP: Now, when you say redemption is one of your favorite themes now…

    GERVAIS: I never understood it growing up. I was one of those kids that didn’t understand things like the prodigal son. I thought, “Well, why is he getting all the attention? He screwed up once.” But as you get older you understand that, you know, forgiveness is possibly the greatest virtue. You’ve got to be a very cold person not to genuinely accept a heartfelt apology. And in fiction it is the most beautiful theme. I think we did it in The Office. I’m particularly proud of how we did it in Extras with Andy Millman, who was basically body snatched by fame – this trivial, awful, shallow, shiny object – and left behind the total opposite of that, which is friendship. And that was a joy. I was more excited about that than all the guests and all the funny lines put together.

    KP: I would say that Andy was a willing participant in his body snatching…

    GERVAIS: Well, of course he was, but that’s what it is, isn’t it? When you become a zombie you like eating flesh…

    KP: And you’re wondering why all your friends don’t…

    GERVAIS: Yeah. This metaphor’s gone… I don’t know what we’re doing now.

    KP: I’m waiting to see how far you take it.

    GERVAIS: (laughs) Wow. What I’m saying is he was a willing participant, but it wasn’t his fault. It’s like that episode of Batman when they gave Robin a pill and he was suddenly bad. Batman knew he couldn’t help it. He had to fight him, but he still loves him.

    KP: Do you think it’s sort of a case where you get in too deep after a certain point?

    GERVAIS: Are we still on Batman now?

    KP: We could still be on Batman if you want to talk about that instead…

    GERVAIS: No. (laughs) I tried to throw in a worse metaphor so you took your eye off the first one.

    KP: You almost accomplished that.

    GERVAIS: What I’m saying is yeah, these people are willing participants, but it’s not their fault because, by definition, they have been body snatched. It was gradual. It started off, you think he’s an alright guy – and he was a very normal man. More so than David Brent. Cleverer than David Brent. A more normal person than David Brent. But because of all those things, he was a more dangerous man than David Brent in many ways. And when he put his mind to it, he decided that if he couldn’t beat them, he’d join them. And when we were first writing Extras, we realized that there was something missing with Andy Millman, and that was that he was alright and he didn’t care. And we had to give him that obsession. We had to give him this foible. We had to give him this jeopardy. And that was the fun duality with Andy Millman – that he was normal and funny and he was surrounded by idiots except when he needed something from someone. So when he talked to a director he was suddenly a bumbling fool who was on the back foot and would sell his soul, and he did sell his soul at the beginning of series 2 when, you know… and I wasn’t even saying he should have walked away. I’m saying that that’s one scenario that might happen when you give up integrity for success, in a way. I just think he would have been happier going away and doing something he liked on possibly even a smaller scale. And of course, a lot of it was a little bit of a parallel universe with my career. There but for the grace of God, go I. I always took the other route. But who knows. What if the BBC had said, “We want The Office to have catchphrases and we want you to appeal to four year olds.”

    KP: Andy always struck me as a character that had a delayed sense of self-awareness.

    GERVAIS: Well yeah, because… you see, that’s what happens as well, because these things are flattering. Some people say, “Oh, he’d never do that.” And sometimes the money goes up. Or their appeal goes down. Or they look around and they’re very Nietzschean about it. They start… people grow stronger on the things you leave behind. It starts getting to them. Some actors take roles because they don’t want another actor to take it. Some actors take roles because even though it’s a bad film, and they know it’s a bad film, they think they can make it a good one. Some actors take films because they think they won’t be asked again. Some actors take films because they don’t give a shit about the film and they want the paycheck. You know, there’s loads of reasons why these people take it. And they’re all fine. All those reasons are fine. But integrity is doing something that you know you shouldn’t really. There’s nothing wrong with doing a comedy that’s catchphrases and putting on wigs if that’s what you like. But it’s if you don’t like that – if you know there’s something better, if you know there’s something more in you, if you know you think you might regret it, if it’s not what you set out to do – than it’s a compromise. And I think compromise in art is a bad thing. And I think it’s a bad thing across the board, by definition, because you either care or you don’t. And if you care, I don’t know what a compromise is, really. One of my favorite sayings is “comedy is a horse designed by committee”. Now, there’s nothing wrong with a camel. Let me say now – I’ve got nothing against the camel…

    KP: Well, that’s just to placate the Camel League…

    GERVAIS: (laughs) Yeah. My favorite bit of the camel is the hump. So let’s get that out there. All I’m saying is, Andy knew… he took a risk with his happiness, and it didn’t pay out.

    KP: So how close have you personally come to crossing that line?

    GERVAIS: Well, you know, I get these little challenges all the time. Again, there’s nothing wrong with doing adverts. I think I did a couple first out, but I wasn’t proud of them. And when you don’t need to do them, how rich do you need to be? I remember I said I don’t do adverts, and I got offered… it was a drinks company in America, offered me a million pounds for a day’s work. And I thought about it and I thought, “That is a lot of money.” But I thought, “I’d hate myself.” And I said no. They came up with two million. They thought I was negotiating. Which annoyed me. So then I really wanted to take that two million, but I couldn’t. (laughs)

    KP: So, because of your nonparticipation, you killed the re-launch of Mr. Pibb.

    GERVAIS: (laughs) There’s things that sometimes I don’t do because I don’t want to have people sick of the sight of me. I could be on every panel show in England. I could be on telly every day. But what good would it… why? These people who look through the paper and go, “Where am I? Where am I? I’m not in the paper today. Maybe I don’t exist any more.” Jesus. You know, we put that in there when Maggie says to Andy, “You’ll never be happy because you’ll never be famous enough.” If you judge your happiness on how famous you are or how many column inches you’ve got, or ratings… then you won’t be happy. You’ll never be happy. You’ve got to be happy in what you do. And I couldn’t be prouder of The Office if it had got no ratings, no awards, I couldn’t be prouder of it. Because I enjoyed every minute of it. I enjoyed every minute of writing, acting, and editing. I did love the awards because I like the look on the other people’s faces. (laughs)

    KP: Did you ever go up with a camera just to capture that moment personally?

    GERVAIS: (laughs) It’s usually captured for me, but they always clap and smile like they’re going, “Oh, I’m glad you won.”

    KP: See, at that point, you might as well get the digital camera out, go up to each of them in turn, ask someone to hold the camera, and take the photo as you’re holding the trophy.

    GERVAIS: And go, “Look at you. Say it, admit it – you’re gutted. Admit it – you are absolutely dying inside.”

    KP: “Would you like to touch it?”

    GERVAIS: Yeah. “Admit it – you want to shove this Golden Globe right up my ass, don’t you?”

    KP: “Come on, say it…”

    GERVAIS: The Golden Globe is actually the perfect shape. It is a giant metal suppository. The Emmy? That would be like something out of Se7en. But the Globe, I think, wouldn’t cause too much pain.

    KP: See, you should just invite the other four nominees on stage. You get them all together with you holding the trophy in the center.

    GERVAIS: Hmm. Exactly. It would be like a group of firemen with a battering ram. It would be like that statue when they’re putting up the flag.

    KP: Yes, with you holding it aloft.

    GERVAIS: (laughs) Oh dear!

    KP: That is the moment, I think, where they show their true acting skills.

    GERVAIS: Yeah. (laughs) Oh dear.

    KP: That’s a career defining moment. I noticed that, particularly on the panel shows when you rarely used to do it in the past…. I wouldn’t say panel shows – when you were a guest on a show…

    GERVAIS: Yeah, I do chat shows…

    KP: I was thinking like a Room 101

    GERVAIS: Oh, that was fun ’cause that was almost like a piece of work. Because… yeah, I mean, I try to be funny and stuff, so I would do things like that where it’s… I do chat shows and I do things like Room 101 and I do things like Desert Island Discs because it feels almost nearly a part of your body of work. Whereas when it’s like this… yeah. I mean, I would still do those. I do those sort of things.

    KP: I was just looking at you as a guest on Vic Reeves Examines

    GERVAIS: My god. I think that may have been the first show that I did as a guest when I was just starting out.

    KP: You were still on the 11 O’Clock Show

    GERVAIS: I know. I think that was the very first thing, and it was this thing about whistling, and it was… there was no pre-interview. Well, you could tell. It was totally made up as it went along. He’d made it up as he went along, and I had to react. It was quite a nice sort of shambles, as I remember.

    KP: It certainly plays as an interesting piece of make it up on the fly TV.

    GERVAIS: Yeah, yeah. I don’t think anyone was watching it.

    KP: No, and I think Vic knew that.

    GERVAIS: Yes, I think that’s exactly right. It was almost like radio that they filmed.

    KP: There was a little segment showing what art little Vic had done at school…

    GERVAIS: I think he takes those pictures quite seriously. I think he sells them now.

    KP: He does, but I could see the look on your face going, “Should I give my real opinion?”

    GERVAIS: (laughs) I can’t remember them. I did go to an exhibition and he was very funny. The art, you know… he’s very funny.

    KP: And then you had the whistling gentleman from the pub come in.

    GERVAIS: I can’t remember that.

    KP: You sorta gave a look like, “I’m gonna have to react to this. I’m gonna have to be really positive.”

    GERVAIS: Oh god. What was this on YouTube?

    KP: Oh no. It wound up on the internet. Somebody put the entire series up that they had recorded on VHS.

    GERVAIS: Jesus Christ. Yeah.

    KP: Everyone has copies of something somewhere.

    GERVAIS: Well, this interview is already on YouTube.

    KP: It is. It’s already a two star rating.

    GERVAIS: I’m listening to it back now just a few seconds out of synch just to make sure what I said.

    KP: Have I already been reviewed negatively?

    GERVAIS: Yeah, there’s some comments coming up now. I’ve never found either of them funny.

    KP: Yeah. Well.

    GERVAIS: Oh, there’s a good one. They go, “They both rock,” so it’s even.

    KP: Yeah, but that’s probably John Hodgman saying that.

    GERVAIS: Oh, now there’s a man. There’s a man who I can’t get enough of. He asked for a quote for his book, so I said he was a very clever, brilliant man, but he has a face like a giant baby.

    KP: You’re right. I mean, you’re not wrong.

    GERVAIS: I like that in an intellectual.

    KP: John’s a friend of mine. In fact I’m the one who send John your way all those many years ago.

    GERVAIS: Oh, right. He interviewed me for The New Yorker.

    KP: He was basically running up against a brick wall trying to get in contact with you, so I discretely passed along your cell number and said, “Just call him.”

    GERVAIS: Excellent. Well he’s done a lovely turn in The Other Side Of The Truth.

    KP: And now look, he gets in the movie.

    GERVAIS: He’s great.

    KP: And I never got a phone call.

    GERVAIS: I didn’t know you could play a funny vicar.

    KP: You know what? I’m probably less versatile than I think.

    GERVAIS: (laughs) I would love that on my CV. Just the opening sentence. “Dear Sir or Madam, I would like to start by saying I am probably less versatile than I think. But this is what I think anyway. I am very versatile. And you just turn it around in the first two sentences.

    KP: “My entire goal with this CV is to keep expectations low. I cannot fail to impress.”

    GERVAIS: (laughs) Oh dear.

    KP: “I’ve done very little in my life. As you will see.”

    GERVAIS: “Remember – you have to gauge everything by calibrating it at 50% lower than everything I say, and then you will get a true reading of what I am really like as a person.”

    KP: “I perceive myself as mostly competent.”

    GERVAIS: Yeah. (laughs) “Although others have always disagreed.”

    KP: Yes. “And I am always willing to be more competent.”

    GERVAIS: (laughs) Yeah, “I am not capable. I’m very willing but incapable.”

    KP: “Responds well to most criticism.”

    GERVAIS: (laughs) Oh dear! “PS – my anger management classes are going very well.”

    KP: Yes, “and you’ll be seeing me shortly.”

    GERVAIS: John Hodgman is a very funny, nice man.

    KP: And I see that you had many debates. We had a massive two and a half hour argument about what I thought was a vital choice that one should have to make. In fact, I’ll ask you the question if John hasn’t already.

    GERVAIS: What’s that?

    KP: If you had to choose – you could lose one thing painlessly, and your choice is either a finger or a toe. Which would you choose?

    GERVAIS: Yeah, but do I get to choose which finger and which toe?

    KP: Yes.

    GERVAIS: Well, it would probably be a little toe on my right foot.

    KP: That’s what he went with. I went with the finger because I was more interested in the balance issues.

    GERVAIS: Well, I did think of the balance, but I think I use my right big toe a lot more on my right foot than I do on my left. I think I might be right footed and use that right toe a lot more. I’ve got a huge right big toe. It’s twice as big as my left one. In fact, it’s got toes of its own. It’s actually another foot. I’ve got two right feet and one left foot, so it’s nothing to me, that little toe.

    KP: Purely for balance.

    GERVAIS: Yeah. I swim in circles. Yeah I think so. I asked him what would he rather have – I think this is on YouTube – tiny penises for nipples or breasts for testicles. And he said it’s a no brainer. He said tiny penises for nipples.

    KP: I thought his rationale was well thought out. Those breasticles…

    GERVAIS: (laughs)

    KP: You know, he didn’t do the ultimate monkey’s paw and say maybe you could just wish for a small cup size…

    GERVAIS: Yeah.

    KP: He automatically thought they would be double D’s hanging between. He could have specified.

    GERVAIS: He asked me also, flight or invisibility.

    KP: I think you made the valid point of saying it would have to be powered flight.

    GERVAIS: Yeah. That was my fear, was that I’d choose that like in the monkey’s paw and it’s a stitch up and I’m just flying six feet off the ground and people are punching me in the face.

    KP: So, if you had to choose salt or sugar for the rest of your life, which would you choose?

    GERVAIS: You mean to add to things? Obviously you can’t live without either, but you mean… so I could eat a plate of food…

    KP: As the sole additive that you had.

    GERVAIS: As the sole additive, no doubt about it, I’d lose sugar.

    KP: So salt is a no go for loss for you.

    GERVAIS: Yeah, I’d like salt, I think. These are like Maggie questions from Extras. We do this all the time.

    KP: But really, these are the questions that define who you are.

    GERVAIS: In fact, I think in one episode she says what would you rather eat, too salty or too sweet? I said it doesn’t matter. If it’s too anything it would taste disgusting. She went, “Well, I’d have too salty, because I like crisps.”

    KP: Let’s see if you think your way out of this one. So you’re only allowed one food item…

    GERVAIS: Right.

    KP: And you have to eat that food item every day.

    GERVAIS: Yeah, but you have to define what an item is. Because obviously, you’re not going to break it down to its component food groups. You’re obviously not gonna say a roast dinner. So what is an item?

    KP: No, you could say a roast dinner.

    GERVAIS: Oh, you can have a meal.

    KP: Yes, but what is your meal that you would choose for perpetuity.

    GERVAIS: Jesus.

    KP: But you can’t have anything else. No other variation. It would be that exact same meal for every meal for the rest of your life.

    GERVAIS: Well obviously, I mean, surviving and health is very different to what you get sick of. So assuming you’d get sick of everything, I would go for something that would at least bring me health. So a rough estimate I’d probably have to go something like… oh god, it’s difficult. Because you’d need a chicken or fish in there, wouldn’t you. You’d have to have a chicken or fish. Oh god. It would all get bad, wouldn’t it? It would all get really bad.

    KP: I’d say after the first week you’d pretty much regret it.

    GERVAIS: Yeah, you’re screwed anyway, so you want to get all the groups. Oh, it’s got to be like a meat and two… I mean, the sensible thing to do would be something like a Cobb salad. I think you’re pretty much covered there.

    KP: Yeah, but what kind of life are you leading then?

    GERVAIS: Well, you started it. Cobb salad. I think you’re annoyed that I’ve come up with the best idea you’ve ever heard. And it shot through your head. You thought, “That’s brilliant.” It’s so much, it’s got everything. Avocados, it’s got chicken, it’s got bacon, it’s got the salad. It’s got every vitamin under the sun there and it’s got an egg. And you’re kicking yourself, and that shot through and you felt slightly stupid and you lashed out. And shame on you.

    KP: And now that you called me out, I’m crying right now.

    GERVAIS: Yeah. So Cobb salad. There you go.

    KP: I chose a pizza with literally everything.

    GERVAIS: (laughs) I take back my speech. You win! Why didn’t I think of that? A pizza with literally everything is the best answer I’ve ever heard. A pizza with literally everything!! Oh god.

    KP: Now, admittedly, it’s gonna take a while to pick through things each meal.

    GERVAIS: Oh god. I’d just have a piece of toast. I’m fine.

    KP: But you got a buffet on a crust.

    GERVAIS: It’s amazing. That’s amazing. A pizza with literally everything. Yeah. I mean, I’m looking at it now and it’s actually got a can of Coke and a pint of beer. Oh, amazing.

    KP: You gotta monkey’s paw through these things.

    GERVAIS: But you’d be fat and happy, but I’d be healthy and bored.

    KP: It is a remarkable trade off that I probably would have to deal with, wouldn’t I?

    GERVAIS: It’s funny, because that is… I am fat and happy. Where I see a lot of other people healthy and bored. (laughs) It’s like, that’s what I chose in life. I chose the pizza with everything.

    KP: When was the last time you had a Cobb salad?

    GERVAIS: I can tell you exactly when. It was the Four Seasons Hotel in Los Angeles about a month ago.

    KP: And prior to that, the last time you were in the Four Seasons Hotel?

    GERVAIS: I think it was. I think the last time was when I was in the Four Seasons in Los Angeles. (laughs)

    KP: So the Four Seasons is literally the personification of your wish.

    GERVAIS: But salad makes sense when it’s 85 degrees and you’re sitting outside.

    KP: No it really doesn’t, I wouldn’t think.

    GERVAIS: It… yeah. Well, I only had it once. I was there a week and I had it once. I didn’t make a habit of it.

    KP: Was it based on a recommendation? Had you had Cobb salad prior…

    GERVAIS: No, but I like it because it is a little bit of everything.

    KP: So you can feel healthy.

    GERVAIS: There’s nothing quite like… I laugh at vegetables. They’ve got nothing. They’re smug and I laugh in their face. I should dismiss the avocado. But when you taste it, it’s like the banana of the vegetable world. It’s tasty, it’s fatty, chewy. There’s a bit of substance to it. And I respect it.

    KP: That’s why the early Californians called it the calana.

    GERVAIS: What does that mean?

    KP: I don’t know, I just made it up.

    GERVAIS: (laughs) Okay. Yeah. Oh dear. It’s like the chicken of the tree.

    KP: It is literally the chicken of the tree.

    GERVAIS: It’s the chicken of the tree. I want…

    KP: That’s what avocado means in the native language.

    GERVAIS: If the Avocado Society of America need a slogan: “Avocado – It’s the chicken of the tree.”

    KP: I want to see the PSA that you do for them.

    GERVAIS: I don’t even know if they grow on trees. Do they? I imagine they’re more on bushes, aren’t they?

    KP: No, I believe they’re avocado trees.

    GERVAIS: Yeah, but you believe some strange things.

    KP: And I’m willing to put my complete sincerity behind it in hopes that you’ll go along with it.

    GERVAIS: Yeah, but the difference between me and you is you’re gonna look it up afterwards on Wikipedia.

    KP: I could look it up right now to make it really awkward.

    GERVAIS: Okay, go on then. What is an avocado, as well? I think it must be a fruit. It’s got a seed, it’s got flesh, and it’s got a skin, so it must be a fruit, surely.

    KP: Let’s see… avocado. We’ll go to Wikipedia because they’re never wrong.

    GERVAIS: Don’t diss Wikipedia. I’ve dissed it before and I felt guilty because they’re a non profit-making organization.

    KP: No, they are trees.

    GERVAIS: They’re fruit then, aren’t they…

    KP: It is a fruit, yes.

    GERVAIS: It is a fruit, but I’ll tell you what…

    KP: Also known as the butter pear, or the alligator pear.

    GERVAIS: Yeah. It may be a fruit, but in a war, it would side with the vegetables.

    KP: I would love to see the fruit-vegetable war.

    GERVAIS: The tomato would be… well, it would literally go red because it wouldn’t know what to do, but I think they would sort of… The fruit goes, “You’re a fruit…” and it would look over the vegetables and the vegetables go, “Think of everything we’ve been through. Think of it.” And the tomatoes would go, “Okay, we’re gonna fight with the vegetables.” And all the plums and tomatoes would be going, “Fucking tossers. You fucking…” and the avocado would go over there and the fruits wouldn’t even know it’s a fruit. The avocado would go, “Leave him alone, leave him alone!” And the fruit…

    KP: You sure they wouldn’t just call them, like, the Vichy fruit?

    GERVAIS: Yeah, they’d be caught in the middle, I think. I don’t know. That’s interesting. I really don’t know what would happen there. Maybe you could talk to John Hodgman.

    KP: Or would the tomatoes be the ultimate double agent?

    GERVAIS: I don’t know, but I feel…

    KP: The fruits going, “Listen, you’re the one who can pull it off. You need to go in there as a vegetable and find out what they’re doing.”

    GERVAIS: I really think a tomato feels more at home with other vegetables than fruits. I genuinely believe that. There’s no tomato jam; there’s tomato ketchup.

    KP: I think there’s no tomato jam because no one had ever tried.

    GERVAIS: I know but it wouldn’t… it’s silly. There’s marmalade that’s made of oranges. There’s strawberry jam. You’ve got all the fruit jams you want. And likewise there’s no strawberry ketchup. So let’s be grown up about this. Let’s not look at the biology – let’s look into the heart and ask it, “What are you?” It would say, “I’m a vegetable.” It would look at other vegetables and go, “Listen, I don’t care about who my biological… you’re my real dad.”

    KP: But do you ever think about the hurt that might be there? He might be the outcast of the fruit world, going, “I could have the taste really if you just give me…” “No. You do not taste like us.”

    GERVAIS: Yeah, I think it’s been kept from him. I think no one has ever… I think it’s a revelation. I don’t think the tomato knows it’s a fruit, really. It’s so vegetable-y. It’s so…

    KP: Do you think it’s like the white child raised by Indians?

    GERVAIS: Exactly like that. Although we call them Native Americans.

    KP: As do we.

    GERVAIS: (laughs)

    KP: You know, really this interview is just a function of you tearing me down now, isn’t it?

    GERVAIS: (laughs) Yeah, but you still are winning. You’re still up because you got ten out of ten for pizza with literally everything.

    KP: I appreciate that. It’s how I win all arguments now. I just pull that out.

    GERVAIS: Yeah. Have we done anything so far that you can use?

    KP: Believe me, this is on par with all of our previous interviews.

    GERVAIS: (laughs) Well, then I can only blame you.

    KP: I’m completely fine with that. Really, aren’t these the important topics we’re discussing?

    GERVAIS: They are. I mean they’re things that…

    KP: They’re timeless.

    GERVAIS: I was asking Karl Pilkington today… He was getting really stressed…

    KP: No…

    GERVAIS: (laughs) Yeah. I was saying, if you’re the last man on a desert island and there’s one orangutan, a female orangutan, and you have kids with it, little kids…

    KP: So we’re already pushing past that initial choice…

    GERVAIS: (laughs) Yeah. And I get him hooked in, like, he’s got no choice. And I can see it happening. I can see my slight of hand work when his eyebrows go down and now he’s… ’cause I don’t give him a chance to go, “Definitely not.” He’s already there.

    KP: Now he’s a committed family man.

    GERVAIS: And I know that I’ve got him there, sitting on the beach. And now he’s, like, fifty, and he’s shaved her arms and done something with her hair, and she’s slimmed down a little bit, and he’s got his three little oranguhumans just sort of running around. They look a bit like him but with shorter legs. And I say, and then the kids grow up and you’re there and you’re in your twilight years and you’re just sitting there holding hands with your wife. I said, would you look back and think it was weird, the first 30 years? You know, “I had houses.” And he thought about it for a while, and he goes, “I wouldn’t do it.” And he’d gone through this whole thing, the whole scenario with me, and then at the end he said he wouldn’t do it. I said, “Is it the sex?” He goes, “Well, yeah, but I wouldn’t…” I said, “Well, what if you can artificially inseminate her?” And he went, “I wouldn’t want to. Forget it.” I go, “Then you’ve got to populate the world.” He goes, “Forget it. If we couldn’t survive, we don’t deserve to survive.” (laughs) Oh god!

    KP: I love how he called you out on your slight of hand, though.

    GERVAIS: I know.

    KP: Which was marvelous. The fact that you pushed right through that initial shock and go, “No, you’ve already got the kids. You’re committed.”

    GERVAIS: But the thing is I know that I can hook Karl with a story. I know he’s just like the best person to tell anything to. So I go Karl… and he knows. And I go, “Imagine this…” And I’ve already got him because his brain’s going. It’s in there. I’ve caught him. I’ve trapped him. He’s come into the jam jar.

    KP: You’ve already done the “ooh shiny” moment.

    GERVAIS: Yeah, exactly. (laughs) “Oh, it’s amazing!”

    KP: We were supposed to do an interview with Karl and never heard back.

    GERVAIS: Oh, that’s ridiculous.

    KP: He’s almost as elusive as Jonathan Ross.

    GERVAIS: Oh yeah. He gets enough publicity. Speak to Karl.

    KP: Although considering how much money he’s getting from the license payers, maybe I should just call the government and ask for an interview with Jonathan.

    GERVAIS: Me and Karl have to earn our money in the free market.

    KP: I have noticed over the past year or so Jonathan is making more and more awkward jokes about how much he’s wasting.

    GERVAIS: Well, that’s probably to annoy the papers that say he’s not worth it. You get to a point where… that’s why I still say I tend to be arrogant at awards shows, because I like annoying the people it annoys. (laughs) So you get to that position where you think, “Why is my life annoying someone else?”

    KP: So you’re saying you’re just going for the Daily Mail readers.

    GERVAIS: Well, I’ve named nothing.

    KP: I have, though, and you haven’t denied it.

    GERVAIS: (laughs) Wow. (laughs)

    KP: That was my own cunning trap, Ricky.

    GERVAIS: I don’t know that I am going for the Daily Mail reader.

    KP: I’m sorry, the ones who go for the coloring.

    GERVAIS: I don’t know that…

    KP: Because we both know about…

    GERVAIS: I don’t think people are that are stupid, anyway. I think people read these things, but I don’t think they’re swayed either way. It’s a weird thing. It’s like… I don’t know.

    KP: So who are the people that test you at this point?

    GERVAIS: No, what I mean is… yeah, if a journalist says…

    KP: You hate Simon Pegg…

    GERVAIS: Oh, that was mental, wasn’t it? Because Simon was clearly joking.

    KP: I love how they’re so desperate for some kind of feud – because there’s nothing happening in the news right now, by the way.

    GERVAIS: Of course. Well, apart from the war and the credit crunch, yeah.

    KP: They need to start a feud between you two.

    GERVAIS: And Simon sent me a thing saying, “Apparently we’re at war because I called you a fat idiot.” And I sent back, “It’s glandular, you cunt.” (laughs)

    KP: He wasn’t buying it though. Are you familiar with The Little Rascals in the UK? The black and white comedies?

    GERVAIS: Yeah, I’ve heard of that.

    KP: You just brought up glandular. I was doing some research about the film series. And they had, starring in the early versions of the series, these incredibly overweight kids to the point that they looked like they were three and a half foot tall and stuffed in sausage casings. That kind of overweight.

    GERVAIS: Where they actually lose their eyes. Where their forehead starts meeting their cheeks.

    KP: Yes, where it’s just a gradual descent and enveloping of all sensory organs. And they found out that one of the kids was glandular.

    GERVAIS: Apparently it’s about 2% of obesity is glandular. That could be called genetically… basically not their fault.

    KP: I think it’s the ones that you see in the papers when they’re two and they’re called, like, “Thunder Baby”.

    GERVAIS: Then there’s the ones that we’re getting now, and you see the ones that are really fat, and then you see the parents are really fat, and you wanna go, “Well, yeah, because you’re feeding them what you eat. You’re feeding them too much.” Kids are mammals. They’ll eat what is put in front of them and they crave fat and sugar. You’ve got to control it. It’s killing them with kindness, that’s what they think. It’s terrible. And they’ve started something now – we’ve talked about this on the new podcast – they’re weighing the kids at school and they’re sending a letter to the parents saying “Your child is obese.” And my point is the parents will go, “Yeah, I know – we have to push him out the door to get him to school. We know how fat he is. We have to change his trousers every two months because he eats too much.” Like the parents don’t know when their kid is waddling and sweating from going one room to the other, of course they know he’s obese. But when he goes, “Mom, I want a biscuit.” They go, “Oh, give him a biscuit. It’ll shut him up. Give him a biscuit.” It’s ridiculous.

    KP: Well, that’s why they’ve started spray painting them with those scarlet O’s.

    GERVAIS: The scarlet what?

    KP: O’s.

    GERVAIS: What are they?

    KP: O for “Obese”.

    GERVAIS: Oh, I see. (laughs)

    KP: “Oh, see, the fatty’s got the mark.”

    GERVAIS: Although I don’t think you need to spray them. I think you can tell. It’s the ones that block out more light than the other children.

    KP: They’ve also installed them with those backing up beepers.

    GERVAIS: Yeah exactly. They have other children spinning around them in their orbit.

    KP: “Child Reversing.”

    GERVAIS: They start appearing on the ordinance survey map.

    KP: Yes. “Oh, he’s now a landmark.”

    GERVAIS: Yeah – “You can’t move him; he’s a permanent fixture.”

    KP: That’s horrible. This is the audience of the future, Ricky, if they make it that far.

    GERVAIS: Well, they’re good, fat people, because they can’t move. They can’t even use the remote after a while because their fingers are too fat. So if you’re on the channel their telly is stuck on, they just watch you.

    KP: Yes, but imagine if you had the corner on the muumuu market at this point.

    GERVAIS: That would be good.

    KP: Now the market’s supplying all of these overweight people.

    GERVAIS: Well, some of them don’t even bother getting dressed. They just lay in bed.

    KP: Just lay in bed?

    GERVAIS: Yeah. I’m starting to feel sorry for them now.

    KP: They’d change if they could, Ricky. It’s not their fault they wished for the pizza with everything.

    GERVAIS: Well, I do this on my standup…

    KP: You go down…

    GERVAIS: He weighs a thousand pounds, and my point is when he got to 500 pounds, didn’t he start thinking, “That’s a bit much?” That that’s heavy for what is essentially a land mammal? How does it get to that? How do you suddenly start getting 500… I mean, it’s different… by then, something else kicks in, doesn’t it? Something else kicks in.

    KP: Sort of a self denial, or…

    GERVAIS: I don’t know.

    KP: Maybe they live close to a canal.

    GERVAIS: Well, maybe some of them who do get to this point already have some sort of genuine mental illness. I don’t know. I don’t know why they don’t… because… Oh, it’s incredible. Some of them literally can’t move. There was this awful program…

    KP: You’re going to name one of those wonderful documentaries that air in the UK…

    GERVAIS: It was in the UK, yeah. It was called Fat Girls and Feeders. And it’s about these men who find women on the internet and they’re attracted to them, and these women are flattered, and then they feed them until they can’t walk anymore, and that’s their thing. It’s like something from a horror film. I mean, the mentality of the men.

    KP: So it’s sort of like Hansel and Gretel?

    GERVAIS: It’s weird. And they’re trapped. And they have to be saved by their family, and they just keep feeding them And they want to get them to the point… and what it is, it is a psychological disorder on the male part. They want to get them to the point where they’re totally dependant on them, so it’s a power thing over another human. So they have to wash them and clean them. Empty their bedpan. And it’s really, really strange.

    KP: I’m really glad I found out about that.

    GERVAIS: See, I brought the tone down.

    KP: But now what you’ve done is you’ve rock bottomed it, so now we can only go up.

    GERVAIS: Well, sort of. Except I could probably find some more horrific things to talk about. Or find some really horrific things to talk about and then laugh about them so you’re really in a turmoil. You don’t know what to believe anymore. I’ve actually changed your moral compass to a point where you would leave here now and you’d be a different person and you probably would do something quite horrendous.

    KP: I’m waiting.

    GERVAIS: (laughs)

    KP: When you throw the gauntlet down you’ve got to follow up on it.

    GERVAIS: You can’t use any of this.

    KP: Have you read the other interviews that we’ve done with other people? Surely you haven’t.

    GERVAIS: Damn, I’m worried now. I was saying this because I thought you couldn’t use it. Now I have to go back and look at what I said..

    KP: Trust me. One of the things we enjoy is the fact that at least there’s a conversational aspect to it. Even if, frankly, I’m gonna have sleepless nights over it.

    GERVAIS: I think this will have people rushing to watch my standup special. They go, “Well, if he says those sort of things to a learned member of the press, what is he gonna say to a load of people in a room that are drunk?”

    KP: Now, who are you saying it to again?

    GERVAIS: I don’t know. I’m like one of those people – I’ve lost the will to live now. I just want a Mars bar.

    KP: That’s good. We’ll call up Jamie Oliver.

    GERVAIS: I’m seeing him tomorrow.

    KP: Oh really. Are you now on social terms with him?

    GERVAIS: Yeah.

    KP: Or does he have, like, a weekly barbecue?

    GERVAIS: No, he’s a nice bloke. I’ve only met him a few times. He’s coming to a screening of Ghost Town.

    KP: Is that what you’re going on Jonathan for this Thursday?

    GERVAIS: Exactly, yeah. Yeah, that’s right. Wow. It’s like you’ve got a big telescope.

    KP: Well, I keep up on happenings within the UK.

    GERVAIS: I know. I was impressed last time when you started saying things from… you shocked me with one that was really obscure.

    KP: Well, give me time, I’m sure there’ll be another. Now going back, speaking of the standup, I remember pitching and railing and wondering and questioning and querying you in one of our first interviews, after having seen you UK standup, about why it wasn’t being released to DVD in the US, and you claimed that the humor wouldn’t travel and you were wary about it crossing over…

    GERVAIS: No, I did have to… well, there’s two reasons. Obviously, some of it won’t travel. Cultural references won’t travel. You would get references to some of my Big Brother winners and the Goodies and Jonathan Ross, but most people wouldn’t. So I take out all those very specific cultural references. And then anything else goes, really. I don’t take out anything else on concept or taste and decency. And the things that are left are all the universal subjects: Hitler, famine…

    KP: Again, it’s a feel good night.

    GERVAIS: (laughs) I could have released the videos, but I think 30% of it would be lost. So what I did was…

    KP: It certainly would have cut off the bootlegging market.

    GERVAIS: … I conflated them, and so it’s like you’ve got the greatest hits. I gave you the greatest hits.

    KP: So we’re seeing the Amalgamated Ricky Gervais Stand-Up Special.

    GERVAIS: You’re seeing like, oh, um… you’re seeing all three shows with all the bits referencing people you’ve never heard of taken out. And so who’s left? Hitler. Gandhi. Stephen Hawking. And I think when you’ve got those three…

    KP: And you’re assuming Americans have heard of at least two of those.

    GERVAIS: (laughs) When we have to do the DVD for The Office, we repackaged it for BBC America, and there was a glossary. And I understood the glossary of terms like “wanker” and “bender”. But they put in Shakespeare. And I thought, “Now that is too patronizing.” Because if someone’s getting that DVD and they haven’t heard of William Shakespeare, they are not gonna like The Office. Let me guarantee you that now.

    KP: But you’re not looking at the other side. Maybe this was their clever way of getting some poor American to look at that and go, “Who’s this Shakespeare guy?” And that person went to the library they’d never gone to before, found Shakespeare, and went, “You know what? The Office has opened up an entire literary world to me.”

    GERVAIS: I still stand by it. If you have heard and seen the British version of The Office, you have definitely heard of William Shakespeare. My Venn diagram would be two complete circles; one engulfed in the other.

    KP: It’s not really a Venn diagram at that point, is it?

    GERVAIS: And if you know what a Venn diagram is, you’ve seen the English version of The Office and you know who William Shakespeare is. (laughs) That would be another subset.

    KP: Yeah, with about 15 or 16 states in the US that exist outside that Venn diagram.

    GERVAIS: Yeah, exactly. (laughs)

    KP: Now, if it also included, I don’t know, Days Of Our Lives, or some other soap opera…

    GERVAIS: Well, yeah. It’s not a perfect system.

    KP: It’s not, but you need to fix it, Ricky.

    GERVAIS: Yeah. But then again, what sort of weird society is it that goes around giving you one choice of meal for the rest of your life?

    KP: A society that realized that choices must be made.

    GERVAIS: Death row is the only establishment that gives you one meal for the rest of your life, and it is only one meal.

    KP: No, I think by law there’s a requirement of some kind of variety even there.

    GERVAIS: Is there? That’s the saddest thing in the world, being given a last meal. I can’t even think about it.

    KP: What if you were to ask for a taste of freedom?

    GERVAIS: Yeah, exactly. A pizza with literally everything, and that includes a key to the cell. Oh, why is there still death row. Now I’ve brought the tone down again.

    KP: You have. I think this is becoming one of the most philosophical interviews you’ve probably ever done.

    GERVAIS: Yeah… May I just get serious? Stop capital punishment. There you go. Stop capital punishment. Stop killing people. Stop state condoned violence. It doesn’t do any good.

    KP: This is why you’re so good on Comic Relief.

    GERVAIS: (laughs)

    KP: Now I see why you don’t do any in-studio bits.

    GERVAIS: Did you see the bit I did last year when I pretended to be in Africa and cry?

    KP: Yeah, actually, I showed it to an audience at a film festival a few months back.

    GERVAIS: Well, one of the execs at BBC said that when I cried, donations hit the peak of the night. And then when they realized it was a joke, they dropped. So in my own way, I have affected Africa.

    KP: Yes. Someone can’t be cured of some kind of very simple disease now.

    GERVAIS: Yeah. And that’s my fault.

    KP: They lost the ability to buy at least a thousand mosquito nets because of you.

    GERVAIS: And if you haven’t heard of The Office, don’t know what a Venn diagram is, and never heard of William Shakespeare, you’ve never heard of Africa, either.

    KP: Well, that’s true. I think you need to start a Venn diagram of things that Americans have never heard of.

    GERVAIS: (laughs) That’s easy. That’s everything in England. Everything in England except Simon Cowell.

    KP: Just one circle that says Americans and one circle that says the world.

    GERVAIS: America is the world. Let’s face it.

    KP: You gotta think, “All we need is a war there.” Then we’ll know more than we ever want to know about it.

    GERVAIS: No, you can’t have a war here. We’re an island. No one travels to have a war in.

    KP: Could happen.

    GERVAIS: Well, France would have a go. They’re very close. That’s happened before.

    KP: Yes. I love the fact that France is waiting on the sidelines going, “Oh, we’re just itching for a fight.”

    GERVAIS: Exactly, yeah.

    KP: “Give us a moment – you’ll be ours.”

    GERVAIS: It’s 22 miles. You can nearly walk it.

    KP: For the people there, the wars of the Middle Ages never ended.

    GERVAIS: Well, that’s where… oh, you don’t have that sign, do you – putting two fingers up. You have one finger, don’t you?

    KP: I know which gesture you’re speaking of.

    GERVAIS: You know what it comes from, don’t you?

    KP: Yes.

    GERVAIS: Yeah, exactly.

    KP: Now we’ve got literally five or six people scrambling who are reading this interview looking to find our what we’re talking about, because we’re not gonna tell them.

    GERVAIS: Well, I suppose it sort of makes sense, as well, because Americans are a lot younger. The post bow and arrow era. You’re showing that middle finger that was on the trigger.

    KP: Yes – when you’ve had your pointer finger shot off.

    GERVAIS: (laughs) Yeah, exactly. I can’t pull a trigger. Well, John Hodgman couldn’t, anyway, because he’s had his fingers removed instead of his toes… Oh no, that’s you, isn’t it?

    KP: That was me. He chose toe.

    GERVAIS: Yeah, exactly.

    KP: See, that’s my own way of making sure that warfare doesn’t perpetuate itself.

    GERVAIS: Yeah. People can’t pull the trigger.

    KP: But they can run. With a nice, even gait. And that was all I was really looking for in the end.

    GERVAIS: Run away. Being able to run away.

    KP: That is exactly it. That is what I chose. I don’t want to fight. I don’t need that fighting finger.

    GERVAIS: Yeah. You can run away and count your nine fingers.

    KP: I’ll still be alive to do so.

    GERVAIS: I suppose so.

    KP: So, in the end, I think I made the smarter decision. Obviously John, being the warring fellow that he is… as you’ve seen, he’s a very violent man.

    GERVAIS: I think he wants to continue playing piano but without the pedal.

    KP: The pedal just holds you back.

    GERVAIS: (laughs) Yeah, exactly. Yeah.

    KP: That’s because he was born and raised playing just saloon piano.

    GERVAIS: I can imagine. John is the man least likely you’d ever see in the saloon. Except he’d be the doc who would go, “I don’t want to get involved. I’m just taking a bullet out. I don’t know anything.”

    KP: “Why did I come from the East? Why did I let my wife talk me into this? I had a nice practice in Boston. She said, ‘Yeah, but the land is so cheap…’”

    GERVAIS: (laughs) I’d love to see him in a really rough saloon!

    KP: Sitting there with his fruity drink.

    GERVAIS: Imagine if he got drafted. Imagine John in Saigon in 1972. Just with the same glasses on. Just in all his equipment.

    KP: Sitting back, singing a Doors tune to himself.

    GERVAIS: (laughs) Oh god!

    KP: “This pack is really chafing on me. Can any of you help?”

    GERVAIS: “My good man, if you don’t know what chafing is, please look it up. I have a dictionary in my…” (laughs)

    KP: “Is anyone up for Scrabble?”

    GERVAIS: Poor John! It’s like we’re a couple of bullies! It’s like we’re calling him a little bookworm behind his back. Just because he likes to read books.

    KP: He’s rough and tumble. Have you seen the photos of him with his ponytail?

    GERVAIS: I don’t want to.

    KP: Oh, it’s a completely different John.

    GERVAIS: No, I don’t like that at all. I don’t like the idea of that. That’s brought the tone down. That’s brought the tone down worse than having the go at capital punishment.

    KP: So you haven’t seen the new book yet?

    GERVAIS: No I haven’t, no. I wonder if he used my quote. I’ll be so insulted if he didn’t.

    KP: Oh, it’s on the back.

    GERVAIS: Oh is it?

    KP: It’s rather prominent.

    GERVAIS: You know everything. You’re like some sort of weird oracle. Unless you’re part… I think you’re, like, some sort of cyber creature. You’re permanently plugged into Wikipedia.

    KP: Yes, I exist within my own matrix.

    GERVAIS: Yeah. So have you got anything you can use for the interview yet?

    KP: I think so.

    GERVAIS: I think these are the highlights. Jesus I’m struggling.

    KP: You’re struggling to find highlights?

    GERVAIS: Right. I love the fruit vegetable war. That’s got to make it in the top ten. I love the one meal. I was so smug when I thought I did a better answer than you.

    KP: I know. I was letting you go with that.

    GERVAIS: (laughs) And the more we can insult John Hodgman, I think we’ve got a great interview.

    KP: But I will say this. Let me make it clear – he is a wonderful person.

    GERVAIS: Well, yeah, but you don’t need to worry about this because you’re in charge of the edit, anyway. So you can just leave out all the nasty things that you’ve said and you probably will.

    KP: No no, I tend to leave them in because it preserves the flavor of the awkwardness.

    GERVAIS: I quite like the fact that you couldn’t just cheat and say it’s editorial – you had to use it as a quote. You had to say it in this interview for real so you could say it as a quote.

    KP: It’s the only way to preserve the integrity of this entire conversation, isn’t it?

    GERVAIS: I started off taking this interview quite seriously and now I feel like a fool.

    KP: So did I, and so do I.

    GERVAIS: (laughs) Oh good. Well good. It’s been a pleasure.

    KP: And so the standup, were you happy with the US tour?

    GERVAIS: Loved it. Absolutely loved it.

    KP: Was there anything that surprised you?

    GERVAIS: It was great. I love the Kodak. I did two nights at the Kodak, and then that was my favorite venue in the world. And then I did Madison Square Garden, and that was just as good. I thought they were amazing crowds. In fact, doing America made me really love standup, and I’ve started working… I now work on my standup every day, a little bit, and I never did before. I used to sort of do it in… and now I can’t wait. I go to sleep at night and I wake up, and I’ve got a routine. I think of something new every, every night now. I can’t wait. I get a little adrenaline rush thinking, “This will be my best standup ever.” And it was because of the American dates. They were so smart, they were so on it. They all knew their Shakespeare. They knew what a Venn diagram was. And they’d all seen the English version of The Office.

    KP: Now, which cities did you play?

    GERVAIS: LA and New York.

    KP: Cased closed.

    GERVAIS: Well. In fact, on it I say it’s lovely to be doing this American tour. I go, “It’s not a tour. Let’s face it. I messed up and left out the middle bit.” I think that’s in the finished cut.

    KP: Have you ever traversed the US via car or other means of transport?

    GERVAIS: I haven’t. I’ve only been to LA and New York. No – I’ve been to Boston, obviously. And I think Texas, I went once. But no, it’s…yeah, it’s New York and LA all the way. And I think I’ve spent a lot more time in New York. Well, I know I have. It’s probably 95% of all my time in America has been New York. And when I say New York, I mean Manhattan.

    KP: Don’t you have a residence now in New York?

    GERVAIS: I do, yeah. So now when I say Manhattan, I mean the Upper East Side.

    KP: So not only have you gone to only the elite centers of the US, you now live in the elitist part of the elite center.

    GERVAIS: Yeah. It’s funny as well, because I’ve never been interested in politics. I never even watch British politics. But I’ve been following this election more than anything else. Maybe it’s ’cause I’m gonna be there. Maybe it’s because I’ve spent more time in America. Maybe it’s because Obama’s, like, the most charismatic senator in my living memory. But I can’t believe that one of the criticisms of him is that he’s elitist. What they mean is he’s educated. It’s sort of like, imagine not trusting a man because he knows about stuff. (laughs) It’s like the whole of America do to him what we just did to John Hodgman.

    KP: Now you’re making me feel bad all over again.

    GERVAIS: Yeah. It’s like, “Well, how were we meant to choose our president?” Just a drinking competition?

    KP: Rock paper scissors?

    GERVAIS: I don’t know what he’s done wrong by being sort of thoughtful and intelligent…

    KP: I think you really just give them a wedgie, and whoever doesn’t cry gets to be president.

    GERVAIS: Someone asked me what I thought of Sarah Palin the other day, and I said I know one thing about her and I don’t need to know anything else. And that is that she thinks that if you’re raped by even a family member, you should not have an abortion. There is nothing… I don’t need to know any more about her. In fact, I don’t want to know anything. That’s the only thing I ever want to know about her.

    KP: And beyond that, in her municipality when she was mayor, she made rape victims pay for their own rape kit.

    GERVAIS: Okay. Yeah. But the thing is… it’s like you’ve told me that Hitler cheated at Trivial Pursuit. I’m not going to hate him any more.

    KP: Oh no, I’m not saying that that was meant to push you over the edge you’ve so clearly crossed.

    GERVAIS: No, that is mental though. That’s proper… that’s mental, because that’s slightly weird because it’s almost like a psychological torture.

    KP: Well, that’s like slapping someone and having them say thank you.

    GERVAIS: It’s genuinely… Okay, yeah, now I got a little bit of an adrenaline rush there. That is worse. Okay, now I know two things. Jesus Christ.

    KP: She’s just insane. Have you seen the video of her being exorcised of witchcraft?

    GERVAIS: Oh, for fuck’s sake.

    KP: Oh, YouTube is great. You can do a double watch of that and her talent portion of the beauty contest…

    GERVAIS: Oh, someone’s put one on today that I saw. “Sarah Palin is like David Brent.”

    KP: Oh really?

    GERVAIS: Yeah, and she does this thing. They show the thing from The Office and this thing from Sarah Palin, and it’s just like it. It’s like when Brent lies, it’s really good. It’s really funny. I laughed, I laughed. Because I knew what was coming. I knew what they meant before they showed the bit from The Office, and it’s really, really good.

    KP: So how does it feel to be a cultural touchstone?

    GERVAIS: Well, the other day someone said McCain was like David Brent, so maybe David Brent’s just like everyone.

    KP: So he’s an archetype.

    GERVAIS: Yeah. Maybe he’s a cliché. Maybe I’m not as clever as I first thought.

    KP: Maybe he’s an archiché.

    GERVAIS: (laughs)

    KP: I’m glad that such a simple, stupid joke as combining two words got a laugh out of you.

    GERVAIS: (laughs) That’s good. I like that. Unfortunately, I’m gonna have to go now.

    KP: Well it’s not the first time I’ve head you say that.

    GERVAIS: This is always a pleasure.

    KP: And I still say finger and not toe. I should email you the contract… because we made a bet on the finger or toe thing. I was about to do a convention with the people we were debating with, and we made a public bet about who would be the winner and who would have more people choosing finger or toe.

    GERVAIS: People are always gonna choose the toe.

    KP: You know, and I don’t get it.

    GERVAIS: People are always gonna choose the toe. Same as anything to do with eyes. Nothing’s gonna be eyes. I think they’d lose both hands before they lost both eyes. People want to see. People want to be out there and people want to…

    KP: Why don’t people want to have good balance? And a steady gait?

    GERVAIS: (laughs) I love this new campaign.

    KP: And here’s the thing; we actually were so bad in our argument we pulled in the table next to us at the bar we were arguing at. And this lovely couple who were having dinner, going, “You know, we couldn’t help overhearing – what the hell are you arguing about?” So we let them in, and the woman goes, “Well, I’d pick finger.” “Why would you pick finger?” “Well, I’m a runner.” That made sense. That person’s a runner.

    GERVAIS: That’s true.

    KP: Her boyfriend, at that point, then picked toe. And we proceeded over the next 40 minutes…

    GERVAIS: Because he’s a pianist.

    KP: Well, we proceeded to destroy their relationship as they began arguing about it.

    GERVAIS: Brilliant.

    KP: And eventually left the pub ticked off at each other about the choices they had made.

    GERVAIS: That’s amazing.

    KP: I’m just saying – John and I bring people together.

    GERVAIS: Yeah.

    KP: And tear them apart.

    GERVAIS: It’s like the opposite of the Nobel Peace Prize.

    KP: It is the Hodgman-Plume Peace Prize.

    GERVAIS: And say hello to John for me.

    KP: I will do so. His book comes out next week.

    GERVAIS: Brilliant.

    KP: Then he starts on his book tour.

    GERVAIS: If it does better than the last one, it’s mainly due to my quote.

    KP: That should be your quote on the third one.

    GERVAIS: On the third one, yeah.

    KP: “I would like to claim all responsibility for any sale that he might have gotten.”

    GERVAIS: I think it should be all my quotes and just him on the back saying, “This is a book of Ricky Gervais’ quotes.”

    KP: I don’t know why you don’t market that.

    GERVAIS: (laughs) Yeah. I suppose that’s sort of what writing a book is, isn’t it? A book full of your quotes.

    KP: Here’s something that aggravated me. There’s an author named Sarah Vowell in the US who does these wonderful books exploring history. Very much like what John does, but she does it for history and it’s actually true. I was reading the reviews of her new book on Amazon, and one of the criticisms was “It’s too wordy.”

    GERVAIS: (laughs)

    KP: I mean, by it’s very definition, shouldn’t a book be wordy?

    GERVAIS: That’s really good.

    KP: Otherwise it’s just blank pages!

    GERVAIS: Yeah. I think Leonardo DaVinci had a similar criticism where there was “too many pictures.”

    KP: “You’re too thinky.”

    GERVAIS: Yeah, “too thinky.” (laughs) That’s good. I like that. “John Hodgman’s too thinky.”

    KP: Well, it’s been a pleasure yet again. We’ll have to make this like a yearly thing.

    GERVAIS: It’s a deal.

    KP: Yeah, I’ve heard that before.

    GERVAIS: (laughs) No, definitely.

    ##

  • Ken P. D. Snyde-Cast #47: Finland

    snydecast-header.png

    snydecast-logo2.png

    Adult Swim’s Dana Snyder and FRED’s Ken Plume set out to have a literate conversation between two pals, but inevitably devolve into a verbal, and funny, free-for-all full of bickering, infighting, and the special kind of male bonding that comes from conflict expressed through the podcast medium.

    Actor/comedian/raconteur Dana Snyder, you’re certainly aware, is Aqua Teen Hunger Force’s Master Shake, Squidbillies‘ Granny, Minoriteam’s Dr. Wang, and The Venture Bros.‘ Alchemist. Available for weddings and bar mitzvahs (bat availability pending), you can keep tabs on him via his website, www.eyeofthesnyder.com.

    Ken Plume is the editor-in-chief here at FRED. He is a friend of Dana’s, as well as his arch-nemesis.

    VISIT THE SNYDECAST EXPERIENCE

    linesm.gif

    KEN P.D. SNYDECAST #47: Finland – Ken & Dana return with the promise to end a cliffhanger, but wind up arguing over the ongoing logo contest, venture into Dana’s workshop, announce their upcoming music channel on live365, argue some more, discuss dialects, inaugurate their poetry corner, and wind up on a high note.
    [CONTENT WARNING]: This podcast may contain some foul language and horribly off-color jokes. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

    DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
    Episode #47 (MP3 format)

    [audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/snydecast/ken_p_d_snyde_cast-47.mp3]

    SUBSCRIBE
    Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

    Got something to say? E-mail Dana & Ken at the Snydecast mailbag.

    line.gif

    CLICK HERE FOR THE SNYDECAST ARCHIVES

    line.gif

    ##

  • Ken P. D. Snyde-Cast #46: Are You There, Steven? It’s Me, John.

    snydecast-header.png

    snydecast-logo2.png

    Adult Swim’s Dana Snyder and FRED’s Ken Plume set out to have a literate conversation between two pals, but inevitably devolve into a verbal, and funny, free-for-all full of bickering, infighting, and the special kind of male bonding that comes from conflict expressed through the podcast medium.

    Actor/comedian/raconteur Dana Snyder, you’re certainly aware, is Aqua Teen Hunger Force’s Master Shake, Squidbillies‘ Granny, Minoriteam’s Dr. Wang, and The Venture Bros.‘ Alchemist. Available for weddings and bar mitzvahs (bat availability pending), you can keep tabs on him via his website, www.eyeofthesnyder.com.

    Ken Plume is the editor-in-chief here at FRED. He is a friend of Dana’s, as well as his arch-nemesis.

    VISIT THE SNYDECAST EXPERIENCE

    linesm.gif

    KEN P.D. SNYDECAST #46: Are You There, Steven? It’s Me, John. – Ken & Dana announce that they’ll be attending this year’s DragonCon in Atlanta, discover the quantum effects of podcast recording, and then dive full bore into Indiana Jones and ponder why John Rhys Davies’s phone didn’t ring before going deep into their childhood theme park memories.
    [CONTENT WARNING]: This podcast may contain some foul language and horribly off-color jokes. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

    DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
    Episode #46 (MP3 format)

    [audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/snydecast/ken_p_d_snyde_cast-46.mp3]

    SUBSCRIBE
    Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

    Got something to say? E-mail Dana & Ken at the Snydecast mailbag.

    line.gif

    CLICK HERE FOR THE SNYDECAST ARCHIVES

    line.gif

    ##

  • Ken P. D. Snyde-Cast #45: Danercise

    snydecast-header.png

    snydecast-logo2.png

    Adult Swim’s Dana Snyder and FRED’s Ken Plume set out to have a literate conversation between two pals, but inevitably devolve into a verbal, and funny, free-for-all full of bickering, infighting, and the special kind of male bonding that comes from conflict expressed through the podcast medium.

    Actor/comedian/raconteur Dana Snyder, you’re certainly aware, is Aqua Teen Hunger Force’s Master Shake, Squidbillies‘ Granny, Minoriteam’s Dr. Wang, and The Venture Bros.‘ Alchemist. Available for weddings and bar mitzvahs (bat availability pending), you can keep tabs on him via his website, www.eyeofthesnyder.com.

    Ken Plume is the editor-in-chief here at FRED. He is a friend of Dana’s, as well as his arch-nemesis.

    VISIT THE SNYDECAST EXPERIENCE

    linesm.gif

    KEN P.D. SNYDECAST #45: Danercise – Ken & Dana return for another walk through verbal minefield, making the occasional excursion into Dana’s humanitarian tours, the freakish big screen adventure of a pair of raggy dolls, kiddie nostalgia and themed exercise, go after a critic rather unmercifully, and deal with Dana’s awkward references before making things even more awkward.
    [CONTENT WARNING]: This podcast may contain some foul language and horribly off-color jokes. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

    DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
    Episode #45 (MP3 format)

    [audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/snydecast/ken_p_d_snyde_cast-45.mp3]

    SUBSCRIBE
    Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

    Got something to say? E-mail Dana & Ken at the Snydecast mailbag.

    line.gif

    CLICK HERE FOR THE SNYDECAST ARCHIVES

    line.gif

    ##

  • Ken P. D. Snyde-Cast #44: Fat Sam’s Grand Slam Speakeasy

    snydecast-header.png

    snydecast-logo2.png

    Adult Swim’s Dana Snyder and FRED’s Ken Plume set out to have a literate conversation between two pals, but inevitably devolve into a verbal, and funny, free-for-all full of bickering, infighting, and the special kind of male bonding that comes from conflict expressed through the podcast medium.

    Actor/comedian/raconteur Dana Snyder, you’re certainly aware, is Aqua Teen Hunger Force’s Master Shake, Squidbillies‘ Granny, Minoriteam’s Dr. Wang, and The Venture Bros.‘ Alchemist. Available for weddings and bar mitzvahs (bat availability pending), you can keep tabs on him via his website, www.eyeofthesnyder.com.

    Ken Plume is the editor-in-chief here at FRED. He is a friend of Dana’s, as well as his arch-nemesis.

    VISIT THE SNYDECAST EXPERIENCE

    linesm.gif

    KEN P.D. SNYDECAST #44: Fat Sam’s Grand Slam Speakeasy – Ken & Dana lose their memories in a spectacular display of apathy towards their own recent recording history before moving on to video games, Jay Edwards & Ned Hastings, Ken’s comfort zone, Art Garfunkel, the King of the Polka, sugar sandwiches, BUGSY MALONE, pedal cars, and the unkillable Paul Williams.
    [CONTENT WARNING]: This podcast may contain some foul language and horribly off-color jokes. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

    DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
    Episode #44 (MP3 format)

    [audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/snydecast/ken_p_d_snyde_cast-44.mp3]

    SUBSCRIBE
    Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

    Got something to say? E-mail Dana & Ken at the Snydecast mailbag.

    line.gif

    CLICK HERE FOR THE SNYDECAST ARCHIVES

    line.gif

    ##

  • Ken P. D. Snyde-Cast #43: Bombasticalifragilisticexpialidocious

    snydecast-header.png

    snydecast-logo2.png

    Adult Swim’s Dana Snyder and FRED’s Ken Plume set out to have a literate conversation between two pals, but inevitably devolve into a verbal, and funny, free-for-all full of bickering, infighting, and the special kind of male bonding that comes from conflict expressed through the podcast medium.

    Actor/comedian/raconteur Dana Snyder, you’re certainly aware, is Aqua Teen Hunger Force’s Master Shake, Squidbillies‘ Granny, Minoriteam’s Dr. Wang, and The Venture Bros.‘ Alchemist. Available for weddings and bar mitzvahs (bat availability pending), you can keep tabs on him via his website, www.eyeofthesnyder.com.

    Ken Plume is the editor-in-chief here at FRED. He is a friend of Dana’s, as well as his arch-nemesis.

    VISIT THE SNYDECAST EXPERIENCE

    linesm.gif

    KEN P.D. SNYDECAST #43: Bombasticalifragilisticexpialidocious – Ken & Dana return for another decidedly odd episode, full of musical theater, beavers, Eddie Deezan, desperate pleas for work, Nick, Bowie and Bing, challenging Slash at the Viper Room, losing fingers, bulk shopping, mayo, taking a look into the listener mailbag, and heaping high praise upon the newly created Snydewich. Check out a pic and the recipe below…
    [CONTENT WARNING]: This podcast may contain some foul language and horribly off-color jokes. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

    DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
    Episode #43 (MP3 format)

    [audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/snydecast/ken_p_d_snyde_cast-43.mp3]

    SUBSCRIBE
    Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

    Got something to say? E-mail Dana & Ken at the Snydecast mailbag.

    line.gif

    CLICK HERE FOR THE SNYDECAST ARCHIVES

    line.gif

    ##

    line.gif

    snydewich.jpg
    snydewich2.jpg
    THE KEN P.D. SNYDEWICH
    by Official Snydecast Chef Joel Roush

    This sandwich is served hot, as I think we can all agree it must be. The two colors of meat, Genoa salami and roast beef, represent the two personalities of the Snydecast. I’ll leave it to you to decide who gets to be which meat.

    The Plume sauce (the pink one) is a garlic mayonnaise flavored with grenadine and vanilla. Since Dana hates mayonnaise, I created a thick, flavorful vinaigrette made with roasted Vidalia onions, roasted garlic, and orange blossom honey that I’m calling Danagrette. The lettuce, tomatoes, and pickle spear are served on the side along with a ramekin of Plume sauce and a ramekin of Danagrette.

    Served next to the ramekin of Danagrette are the Ken P.D. Snydechips, representing the action and rock & roll. I’ve created a spice mixture especially for these chips called Snydespice, which has a hot/sweet flavor. Add a glass of cold Bud Light (for Dana ““ or the adults) or a glass of cold Cherry-Vanilla Dr. Pepper (for Ken ““ or the kids) and serve.

    Bon Appétit,

    Joel (recipes follow)

    line.gif

    Ken P.D. Snydewich

    2 slices Caraway rye bread or other flavorful, hearty bread; both slices buttered on one side

    6 oz. Roast beef; shaved

    3 oz. Genoa salami; shaved

    2 Havarti cheese slices; thinly sliced

    2 Lettuce leaves ““ placed on the side

    2 Tomato slices ““ placed on the side

    1 Dill pickle spear ““ placed on the side

    2 oz. Plume sauce ““ in a ramekin placed on the side (recipe follows)

    2 oz. Danagrette ““ in a ramekin placed on the side (recipe follows)

    Generous serving of Ken P.D. Snydechips (recipe follows)

    Heat a small skillet over medium heat. Place the roast beef and salami into a small dish and heat in the microwave for one minute. Assemble the sandwich in the heated skilled like so:

    Bread (butter side down)
    Havarti cheese
    Hot beef
    Hot salami
    Havarti cheese
    Bread (butter side up)

    Check the first side of the sandwich after a few minutes. When it is toasted to your liking, carefully flip it over to the next side and toast it like the first side. When it’s done, transfer the sandwich to a cutting board, cut it in half and put in on your plate. The Plume sauce and Danagrette is presented on the side along with the lettuce, tomato, pickle, and Snydechips.

    Plume sauce

    ½ c. Mayonnaise

    2 tbs. Grenadine

    ½ tsp. Vanilla

    1 tbs. Garlic powder

    Pinch Kosher salt

    Pinch Black pepper, freshly ground

    Add all ingredients to a bowl and whisk together until mixture has a uniform pink color.

    Danagrette

    ¼ c. Red wine vinegar

    1 c. Extra-virgin olive oil

    1 tbs. Dijon mustard

    1 Garlic head, roasted

    ½ Vidalia onion, roasted

    2 tbs. Orange blossom honey

    Pinch Kosher salt

    Pinch Black pepper, freshly ground

    Add everything but the oil to a food processor. With the motor running, slowly drizzle the olive oil into the other ingredients until completely combined and the solids are significantly chopped.

    Ken P.D. Snydechips

    For the chips:

    Peanut oil for frying

    2 Yukon Gold potatoes, sliced paper-thin

    For the Snydespice:

    3 tbs. Kosher salt

    1 tbs. Black pepper

    1 tbs. Paprika

    1 tbs. Sugar

    2 tsp. Cayenne pepper

    2 tsp. Garlic powder

    1 tsp. Onion powder

    Heat the oil to 325°F in a large, heavy pot. Carefully add the potato slices to the hot oil to prevent them from sticking together. Fry until golden-brown, approximately 2 minutes. Remove the chips from the oil and place on a paper towel-lined plate. Immediately dust the hot chips with the Snydespice.

    ##

  • Ken P. D. Snyde-Cast #42: Do You Know The Ice Cream Man?

    snydecast-header.png

    snydecast-logo2.png

    Adult Swim’s Dana Snyder and FRED’s Ken Plume set out to have a literate conversation between two pals, but inevitably devolve into a verbal, and funny, free-for-all full of bickering, infighting, and the special kind of male bonding that comes from conflict expressed through the podcast medium.

    Actor/comedian/raconteur Dana Snyder, you’re certainly aware, is Aqua Teen Hunger Force’s Master Shake, Squidbillies‘ Granny, Minoriteam’s Dr. Wang, and The Venture Bros.‘ Alchemist. Available for weddings and bar mitzvahs (bat availability pending), you can keep tabs on him via his website, www.eyeofthesnyder.com.

    Ken Plume is the editor-in-chief here at FRED. He is a friend of Dana’s, as well as his arch-nemesis.

    VISIT THE SNYDECAST EXPERIENCE

    linesm.gif

    KEN P.D. SNYDECAST #42: Do You Know The Ice Cream Man? – Ken & Dana wax on, and on, and on about one of the true lions of the consumer ice cream industry, and find themselves unable to concentrate on anything else, no matter how hard they try.

    snydecast42-01.jpg

    [CONTENT WARNING]: This podcast may contain some foul language and horribly off-color jokes. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

    DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
    Episode #42 (MP3 format)

    [audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/snydecast/ken_p_d_snyde_cast-42.mp3]

    snydecast-album-ad-03.png

    SUBSCRIBE
    Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

    Got something to say? E-mail Dana & Ken at the Snydecast mailbag.

    line.gif

    CLICK HERE FOR THE SNYDECAST ARCHIVES

    line.gif

    ##

  • Ken P. D. Snyde-Cast #41: A Trip To The Wood-Wrong’s Shop

    snydecast-header.png

    snydecast-logo2.png

    Adult Swim’s Dana Snyder and FRED’s Ken Plume set out to have a literate conversation between two pals, but inevitably devolve into a verbal, and funny, free-for-all full of bickering, infighting, and the special kind of male bonding that comes from conflict expressed through the podcast medium.

    Actor/comedian/raconteur Dana Snyder, you’re certainly aware, is Aqua Teen Hunger Force’s Master Shake, Squidbillies‘ Granny, Minoriteam’s Dr. Wang, and The Venture Bros.‘ Alchemist. Available for weddings and bar mitzvahs (bat availability pending), you can keep tabs on him via his website, www.eyeofthesnyder.com.

    Ken Plume is the editor-in-chief here at FRED. He is a friend of Dana’s, as well as his arch-nemesis.

    VISIT THE SNYDECAST EXPERIENCE

    linesm.gif

    KEN P.D. SNYDECAST #41: A Trip To The Wood-Wrong’s Shop – Ken & Dana catch up on last week’s New York Comic-Con, find out what’s in Dana’s workshop this week, get lost in inane workshop talk, make a special plea to their listeners, reminisce about sandwiches lost to time, and try to pull out of a tale spin in time for their new outro song.

    [CONTENT WARNING]: This podcast may contain some foul language and horribly off-color jokes. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

    DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
    Episode #41 (MP3 format)

    [audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/snydecast/ken_p_d_snyde_cast-41.mp3]

    SUBSCRIBE
    Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

    Got something to say? E-mail Dana & Ken at the Snydecast mailbag.

    line.gif

    CLICK HERE FOR THE SNYDECAST ARCHIVES

    line.gif

    ##

  • VENTURE BROS. – New York Comic-Con Panel

    ventureheader.jpg

    If you weren’t one of the lucky few who were able to attend the Venture Bros. panel at New York Comic-Con (and to see the exclusive SEASON 3 TEASER), no need to fret – below, you’ll find the entire panel in 5 easy to navigate streaming editions shot with the Quick Stop Uber-Cam system (you’ll find the embed code for each part beneath the respective segment).

    The new season of Venture Bros. premieres June 1st on [adult swim].

  • Ken P. D. Snyde-Cast #40: Mid-Cast Crisis

    snydecast-header.png

    snydecast-logo2.png

    Adult Swim’s Dana Snyder and FRED’s Ken Plume set out to have a literate conversation between two pals, but inevitably devolve into a verbal, and funny, free-for-all full of bickering, infighting, and the special kind of male bonding that comes from conflict expressed through the podcast medium.

    Actor/comedian/raconteur Dana Snyder, you’re certainly aware, is Aqua Teen Hunger Force’s Master Shake, Squidbillies‘ Granny, Minoriteam’s Dr. Wang, and The Venture Bros.‘ Alchemist. Available for weddings and bar mitzvahs (bat availability pending), you can keep tabs on him via his website, www.eyeofthesnyder.com.

    Ken Plume is the editor-in-chief here at FRED. He is a friend of Dana’s, as well as his arch-nemesis.

    VISIT THE SNYDECAST EXPERIENCE

    linesm.gif

    KEN P.D. SNYDECAST #40: Mid-Cast Crisis – Ken & Dana decide to celebrate their 40th anniversary with a special “What about all those dangling stories from the previous 39 casts?” edition of their award-winning podcast, and dedicate it all to you, the listeners.

    [CONTENT WARNING]: This podcast may contain some foul language and horribly off-color jokes. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

    DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
    Episode #40 (MP3 format)

    [audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/snydecast/ken_p_d_snyde_cast-40.mp3]

    SUBSCRIBE
    Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

    Got something to say? E-mail Dana & Ken at the Snydecast mailbag.

    line.gif

    CLICK HERE FOR THE SNYDECAST ARCHIVES

    line.gif

    ##

  • Interview: Derren Brown

    derrenbrown-2007-08-08-02.jpg

    -by Ken Plume

    derrenbrown-2007-08-08-01.jpgDerren Brown is a very dangerous man. In fact, any encounter with Derren – be it on a street or even your own home – is an affair fraught with peril. He is, in addition to being such hazard, one of the most fascinating entertainers currently plying his arcane trade on television today.

    What exactly is that trade, you ask?

    Derren Brown is – depending on how you look at it – a mentalist, a magician, an illusionist, a hypnotist, a paranormal skeptic… When, in reality, he’s all of these things and more. With an acerbic wit and presentational flair, he’s a riveting performer who’s finally making his way to the US.

    A staple in the UK courtesy of multiple series, specials, and live shows, the Sci-Fi Channel has imported Derren via a rejiggered and expanded edition of his initial effort, Derren Brown – Mind Control. It’s a mixture of tricks and mental feats for a generation raised on Penn & Teller, and a must-see affair. As Derren himself describes it, his work is a combination of “magic, suggestion, psychology, misdirection and showmanship.” The US edition of Mind Control is currently berthed on Thursday nights at 10pm EST.

    I’d also recommend you pick up the DVDs that are currently available in the UK (the original Mind Control, plus the first two series of Trick of the Mind), as well as his must-read book Derren Brown: Tricks of the Mind.

    I got a chance to tempt fate by chatting with Derren, whilst constantly fearing that I would fall under his sway and become nothing more than a puppet in his diabolical schemes…

    line.gif

    KEN PLUME: It’s a pleasure to be speaking with you.

    DERREN BROWN: You too…

    KP: It’s something we’ve been wanting to do for, I believe, two years now…

    BROWN: Really?

    KP: Yes. I’m a huge fan of you and your work.

    BROWN: Oh, thank you very much, that’s lovely. Thank you, Ken.

    KP: And knowing some statements you’ve made in the past regarding enjoying your anonymity in the U.S. …

    BROWN: (laughs)

    KP: What suddenly was the change that brought about the transport of the show and yourself into the arena of a U.S. network?

    BROWN: Well, yeah. I think it just… it’s one of those things that’s always kind of been on the cards. You know we didn’t sell the show to the States, anticipating that one day we might want to have it commissioned out there. That was just something that was always gonna go in the background, and it’s been seven or eight years that I’ve been on TV, so it seemed like a good time to start asking. In terms of the anonymity, for me, I just don’t know… I mean, the difference is I don’t live in the States. If I do become well known out there for the show, it’s something I’ll have to deal with. I like my privacy, but I don’t know. I just don’t know. I was just talking to a previous interviewer about the slightly odd stalkers and strange reactions I’ve had, and God knows what it’s gonna open up starting up out there. So who knows.

    KP: So does that mean at some point you’re going to start hosting America’s Gone Mental with Piers Morgan?

    BROWN: (laughs) Yes, that’s the time. I’ll make a note!

    KP: Do you still find that you have a shred of anonymity within the UK, or do you think that’s largely disappeared?

    BROWN: Well, it’s kind of nice. Channel Four – it’s one of the big channels, but it’s less mainstream. It’s kind of the cooler, edgier kind of programs – which is fantastic for me, because they really support some of the stuff that I do, that I think I’d have trouble getting commissioned on some of the other channels. It’s a mixed sort of audience that watch the show and everything, but it gets – on average – I think about three million people that watch it, which is good figures for that channel. It’s not 20 million that watch the big soap operas. So it feels an okay sort of balance – but I wouldn’t want too much more. I don’t quite have the ambition or the ego of most big flashy magicians, so I’m not gonna be fishing and struggling to be number one magic type mind reading figure out there, so we’ll see. I’m fairly modest about all my expectations. I think it’s a good show and I hope people will want to watch it.

    KP: And you also mentioned that you’re not exactly – by your preference – an outsized personality when it comes to the public eye…

    BROWN: No. Yeah…. I think most of that comes from your own kind of drive and what you want. I mean, I was already doing what I do, quite happily, but just not on TV. And then I was offered the chance to do it on TV – which of course was great and exciting, but I think if you’re already doing something that you enjoy and it’s about just doing more of what you enjoy, that keeps it all sane. As opposed to just wanting to be on TV and famous for the sake and the appeal of that.

    KP: What is that you want?

    BROWN: I’d like to have a place in Florence, and retire and paint at some point, to be honest. I love doing this and it’s great fun, and I’ve been able to kind of reinvent the show a few times and I get to tour every year. I love all of that. So I enjoy it enormously. I have no idea how it’ll go in the States, whether it’ll take off and be a big thing or whether it’s something that will kick over for a while. I think it’s a good show. I’m proud of the show, so I’m very happy with that. Depending on what happens in the States, I may have to drastically change my priorities. I try and be relaxed about it and I don’t have any particularly strong ambitions or strong expectations in any areas.

    KP: Have you found it more difficult going with each new series, as far as developing material for it?

    BROWN: Actually, it’s kind of got easy. I thought it would be more difficult. Very rarely have we felt – I say “we”… it’s me and one other guy, my friend Andy, and we write all this stuff together…

    KP: That’s Mr. Nyman right?

    BROWN: Andy Nyman that’s right, yeah. Who’s currently touring in Death at a Funeral, this new Frank Oz movie. He’s just gone over to LA for a month. It’s opening sometime this month. So for me, what happened is the show’s progressed and matured here. It’s become about – especially the one hour specials that I’ve done – has sort of become about what I feel I wanted to look at or what’s become an area of interest for me. They’ve grown with me – as opposed to just, “Here’s another series, we need to churn out another 50 routines.” It’s never really felt like that. It’s always quite fresh and different. So somehow I’ve had a clearer sense of the sort of thing that I want to do each time, and that’s actually kept it fairly easy to come up with material that still feels interesting and fresh. It hasn’t been as difficult as I might have anticipated.

    KP: Do you feel that you’ve, in lockstep with that, progressed and matured as a performer as well?

    BROWN: I think so, yeah. I mean, I’m doing big stage shows and things that I never thought I’d do, and I had to learn how to do that. I had to learn how to perform in front of two thousand people – which is fairly big for our standards.

    KP: What are the disciplinary differences between TV and on stage for an audience?

    derrenbrown-2007-08-08-03.jpgBROWN: Oh, hugely. You can do stuff on TV but not be particularly much of a live performer. I think it’s just one thing to get something on TV – most of the kind of drama and pace of it will probably come from the editing of the show, and the style and the look of the show. On stage, it’s just me for three hours, and I’ve got to try and keep everybody constantly entertained. That really is just me. So it’s a different set of skills on top of actually making the stuff work. For me, it’s much more exciting, I much more prefer that, and I look forward to hopefully, in time, doing something on Broadway, because it’s a real buzz.

    KP: It definitely is more energizing to see you in that longer sustained form, having seen the Something Wicked special you filmed during your last stage tour…

    BROWN: That’s cool. Yeah, it is different, isn’t it? And it also means I have to be sort of lighter and funnier, and do things that for some reason never really worked too well in the series. The series is quite solemn in comparison. Not a lot of room for gags.

    KP: Would you perceive the character of Derren Brown that you’re performing in those two venues to be different?

    BROWN: Yes, I think it is. Still, I think the stage version is more me, because that’s the… if you’re gonna perform at all well – and I’m not saying that I perform that well – but it has to be you. It has to be a theatrically enhanced or tweaked version of yourself. You can’t just sort of fake your personality. That doesn’t really work. It does on TV, because it’s all sort of fairly quick segments, and I’ve just got to get through what I’ve got to do because it’s got to fit into a format on TV. You know, less room for that. Actually performing the piece, you want them to shine and you want them to interest the viewer at home. So yes, I think in terms of the character, there’s certainly two different sides. That’s kind of interesting. If it was me watching the show and I’d seen that guy on TV, I’d be quite interested if I went to see him on stage and he sort of fleshed him out a bit as a character. But I don’t think of it too much as a character… but I suppose, invariably, you have to, to keep on top of it.

    KP: Do you perceive him as any different from how you are off stage?

    BROWN: I think I’m a lot less the kind of very confident, controlling… It’s a side of me, if I’m comfortably high status (laughs)… I can be like that, but I’m much quieter and more considered, I think. But then it’s really fun if you are like that – and I’m quite indecisive and I’m quiet and private… all those things in real life… so it’s actually quite nice to tap into that side, the more confident aspects of yourself. To do that on stage is a real treat.

    KP: So you’re saying the closest thing people would see to the real you is if they’d seen that bonus feature on your second DVD set, with you eating breakfast rather anal retentively?

    BROWN: Oh that! Yeah probably, probably. Yes, I thought that was quite fun when I watched that. Yeah, it’s all different parts of me. You have to draw from yourself, and then you kind of have to enhance that and make it interesting. With the TV show, it’s fast-paced – it’s difficult having too many layers to that. But sometimes, certainly the show here has gotten funnier and lighter. It never become a big laugh, but the TV show, as it’s grown up, it’s become a little bit softer around the edges, in a good way. And I think that was something that was important. Whereas, yeah, doing the first series for Sci-Fi, I think it has to be very clear to people exactly who I am and what I’m doing. And then hopefully give it room to grow if it gets recommissioned, and has a chance to do that.

    KP: Do you call them tricks? Do you call them performance pieces?

    BROWN: Routines? Segments? I don’t mind. Some people have called them tricks – that’s fine, too.

    KP: Watching the last series, Trick or Treat, on Channel Four…

    BROWN: I’m fascinated that you know the material, that you’ve watched these things. Thank you.

    KP: Like I said, I’m one of the people in the US who’ve been trying to show people your work for the last couple years.

    BROWN: Oh thank you, Ken…

    KP: I’m just glad you’re coming to the US. When you look at those segments, there seems to be both a… you know, obviously because of the concept of the program (where volunteers get to choose what type of piece they’ll be involved in – a trick or a treat), it has a very soft, kind edge, as well as a very, very hard edge with the trick portion of it. Do you see a line that is uncrossable in what kind of segment you’ll do, in terms of what you’ll subject a participant to?

    BROWN: I think, for me, the thing of primary importance is the experience of the person that takes part in it. That’s a huge, important part of it. Although some of the pieces, they may be finished in a way that makes them look quite bleak or traumatic or cruel, the reality is that people always are so well taken care of and always invigorated by it. To me, that’s very important. Especially how participants generally are treated in reality shows and things – it’s just criminal and quite upsetting sometimes. So it’s very important to me that it isn’t like that, and that their experiences are authentic and matches what they see on TV when it goes out, but also that it’s enjoyable for them. So with that in mind, it’s our sort of building drama. It’s a question of not just showcasing, “Look at me, look how clever I am, I can do this” – that was maybe more important at the very start when I had to make a name for myself, but now I’m in the shows less… and ideally, I wouldn’t be in them at all, but I still have to make a living. (laughs) Obviously I have to get my skills and what I do in there, but at the same time what I’m interested in is the drama of the situation – which, at home, you’re empathizing with the person that’s taking part. I think we just sort of sit around and talk about it, and that idea, and a couple of others, came like the zombie arcade game – which I guess you must have seen…

    KP: Yes.

    BROWN: They came out of normally sitting around, talking about smaller sort of tricks, if you like, and ideas, and I go, “Can we just think a bit bigger? What if we… I mean we’d never do this obviously, but what if somebody woke up and they were witnessing their own death in a car crash, and we had a double made of them, or something.” Something like that. And that idea kind of sticks, even though it’s normally said in a spirit of, “Well, obviously we couldn’t do that because that would be really cruel.” And then it sticks, and then…

    KP: And then you did it.

    BROWN: … and then we find a way to do it that isn’t cruel and irresponsible, and that’s sort of interesting and intriguing and fascinating to the person. If it is a bit cruel, at least by the end of it they’ll feel elated and exhilarated and forgive us. Plus they volunteered to take part in the show, and they know the sort of character that I am.

    KP: They know what they’re getting into.

    BROWN: Yeah, they know what they’re getting into.

    KP: Has there ever been a participant that reacted in a completely surprising manner?

    BROWN: It’s never happened. There was one stunt, the staring competition…

    KP: Was that the gentleman that was about to hit you?

    BROWN: Yeah, that’s right. Exactly. That’s as far as it’s gone, but that was specifically to make somebody angry and troubled. That was full of that, so it was hardly a surprise.

    KP: Did you feel, in that situation, that there was the potential for it to get out of control?

    BROWN: I think for me… I get asked this a lot, and I understand that. Maybe it’s just that I’m so on top of what’s happening, and that experience – hopefully knowing how they’re kind of framing it in their minds. It’s difficult to explain, but it kind of… in the same way that hypnotized people look like they’re under the control of somebody else, there’s in fact a much more subtle game of behavioral manipulation, and what looks like one person, the hypnotist, controlling – it isn’t about that at all. It’s about a kind of…

    KP: A dance, would you say?

    BROWN: It is, yes, exactly, it’s more of a dance, so there is… often what it looks like, in terms of that level of cruelty or control, it isn’t really quite like that. And being aware of the subtler aspects of it, I’m utterly comfortable with what I’m doing and how far I’m taking it. Then, in terms of how it’s presented on screen, once the music’s added and whether it’s left on a very bleak note, I like people to feel a bit guilty for having watched it. I think it’s kind of interesting. It’s not the sort of stuff that you necessarily associate with watching, like, a magic show, or something like that, which obviously it’s related to that whole tradition. So I like playing around with all of that – but that’s separate from the person’s experience, which hopefully always comes out very positive. We did this thing called The Heist, which…

    KP: Which, honestly – of all your outcomes – was probably the most disturbing to watch…

    BROWN: Yeah, it was pretty disturbing. Now there, I had the guys come over and watch the show in its rough edit form to make sure… the guy, Danny, who was the one that kind of seemed most disturbed when he was stopped… the one that’s doubled over…

    KP: Who seemed to have a bit of a breakdown…

    BROWN: Yeah. We became good friends. I went out to dinner with them all afterwards, and explained to him the whole of the show, and then Danny came over, and he loved it. He was so exhilarated by it, and he came over and watched the rough edit of the show. Because it was two weeks that had to be pulled down into an hour, and I didn’t want them thinking that I’ve reflected them badly or even it doesn’t reflect what really happened, so he came over as the kind of – as the guy who’d been through the worst – just to make sure that he was happy with it. Which he was. He came and saw a screening of it, and they were all happy with it. It was great. They’re always very well taken care of, and I generally tend to keep in touch with them as well, and some of them become friends. That side of it is hugely important. And yeah, that line you talked about is just one of responsibility. Ultimately, the show is put together intelligently and seriously, and not just sensationally. I know people that have been involved in reality shows and the like, and it’s sort of heartbreaking how ruthless that world is. Maybe it’s partly through seeing that, that makes me realize how important that kind of welfare side of it is…

    KP: That sense of compassion does come through in the programs. I think it’s a fascinating companion to also read your book…

    BROWN: You have done your homework!

    KP: I keep hoping that the book will come over to the U.S., because I’m tired of importing copies for people.

    BROWN: (laughs) Hopefully it will at some point.

    KP: If Louis Theroux can get his book through…

    BROWN: Has his show been in the States?

    KP: No, in fact his show hasn’t aired in the States at all, but they released his book here in the U.S.. His companion book to Weird Weekends.

    BROWN: That’s nice…

    KP: But reading your book, I can definitely see where you’re coming from when you do these sort of things. I think anyone who watches the show probably should read the book just to get a better sense of what your head space is and what your foundation is, as a performer…

    BROWN: I hope that’s something that will – if further series are commissioned, and so on – I hope that’s something that will be allowed to grow. Understandably with the first series, Sci-Fi is very keen that it just nails it straight down the middle, in terms of what I do and how I do it.

    KP: Just out of curiosity, have you seen the “Seven Safety Tips For Dealing With Derren Brown” that’s been circulating the internet?

    BROWN: No, I haven’t!

    KP: Well, here’s the bullet points of it: First one is “Don’t deal with Derren Brown.” Second one is “Don’t go to the United Kingdom”… Which is now moot, of course.

    BROWN: This is something from the States?

    KP: Yeah, there’s a site called needcoffee.com

    BROWN: Okay…

    KP: Number three, “If you suddenly find yourself in the UK and Derren approaches, don’t look at him.” Number four, “If you cannot escape him, do not let him touch you.”

    BROWN: (laughs)

    KP: Number five, “If he manages to touch you, at least keep him from taking hold of your wrist.” Number six, “If he manages to take hold of your wrist, for the love of baby Jesus don’t let him put his hand over your face.”

    BROWN: (laughs)

    KP: Number seven, “Even if he doesn’t touch you, don’t let him not touch you either.”

    BROWN: (laughs)

    KP: And it’s fully illustrated with various clips to back up the assertions.

    BROWN: That’s fantastic!

    KP: That’s from May of this year.

    BROWN: That’s great! I hope you’re going to put those in the article. That’s fantastic.

    KP: Oh, definitely. From a performance point of view, I’m wondering which aspect you find most challenging – is it the memory skills, the dexterity, or the interpersonal communication?

    BROWN: (laughs) The honest answer to that is remembering people’s names when they come up on stage. I did this thing in my first stage tour – I thought, for each city I go to, I will memorize the phone book for that city, then have people call out names and addresses of themselves or their friends or whatever, and I’ll tell them the phone numbers, or around the other way. And I managed to do it – I didn’t always get them right, but managed to do that. But despite that, I never learned the name of the person that would come up that was going through the same book to double check it… the names of people in the audience when they stood up… I’m terrible with that, because I’m so focused on one thing. So it’s always the little things… And utterly ridiculous, because I do this stunt and then thank the person and then have to say, “What was your name again?” You’re like a gag. It got a laugh every night, and I just found it embarrassing. It’s the little things. All the other stuff kind of… (sigh) I don’t know. I’m making it look more difficult than it is. That’s part of the performance. I don’t find it too difficult to monitor something new… I mean, when I’m doing the stage shows, that’s always kind of hard on the first night, and it gradually gets rolled in. It’s a difficult one to answer, but probably the truthful answer is the more entertaining one, I guess, which is people’s names when they come up. I’m very good – like with journalists, I find that if I sit there and do a bank of 10, 20 journalists and I say I will remember all their names, and I always tell them their names back again, and they always write in the articles how impressed they are. But yeah, if I don’t make a point of doing it, I’m just like everybody else – just terrible, terrible at doing that kind of thing. On stage, when it matters most, is when I’m worst.

    KP: It’s fascinating, in watching the first series of Mind Control in the UK, having seen the Devil’s Picture Book tape…

    BROWN: Oh yes… gosh. Wow.

    KP: … to see some of the things reappearing in different guises within the series…

    BROWN: Yeah.

    KP: I thought that was fascinating. That and the reaction you got out of Stephen Fry.

    BROWN: Yes, that’s right. Oh, he’s lovely. He’s such a nice guy. He’s not that well known in the States, is he?

    KP: He is and he isn’t. He’s known to a certain segment, but he’s not everywhere like he is in the UK.

    BROWN: Yeah, yeah.

    KP: One of the things I did want to touch upon briefly was also your painting.

    BROWN: Oh yeah…

    KP: I quite enjoy what I’ve seen…

    BROWN: Well, thank you.

    KP: Your portraits are heavily caricatured, and in capturing the essence of a person, has there been anyone that’s proved particularly difficult for you?

    derrenbrown-2007-08-08-04.jpgBROWN: Al Pacino. It’s probably the least successful that I’ve done. I think it’s on the website, if it’s been updated. But yeah, I always found him very difficult. Really wanted to paint him and have that in the collection, but it’s never been in my… you know why it was? You know, he’s got a very kind of expressive face. It’s not for lack of features to exaggerate, but I could never get it right. It’s sort of all right, the one that I’ve done, but I don’t know if it’s…

    KP: Do you think it’s a difficulty to exaggerate exaggeration?

    BROWN: Yeah. I don’t know what it is, because it’s not a very conscious process. It’s not like you… they are caricatures, even though they’re subtle, but I don’t kind of… you don’t consciously think, “Right, that’s quite a big nose, so I’ll draw a big nose.” You just draw what you see, and then if you naturally see things in an exaggerated way with faces – which I guess I do, which I’ve always had a very good memory for faces because I’ve always seen them and remembered them in this kind of exaggerated way – so you just draw what you have in your head and it just comes out in an exaggerated way. If I try and draw a straight portrait that isn’t exaggerated, I can’t. It just comes out like that. So it’s very difficult, to do it when it isn’t working, it’s kind of hard to make it work. And for some reason I was hung up on that…

    KP: Has your self-portraiture changed much over the years?

    derrenbrown-2007-08-08-05.jpgBROWN: Yes. It’s only the most recent one that I think works for me. There were quite a few previous ones that were not very good. How you see yourself isn’t how other people see you, so if you’re painting somebody else, and you know when it’s right, because it kind of clicks into place, and I can hear their voice talking when it works. You just look at it and it’s like looking at a photograph, and the picture triggers all the associations that looking at the real person would. Whereas yourself, that click doesn’t happen, because you don’t think of yourself in the same was you think of other people. You don’t hear the person’s voice and you think of them, and all those sorts of things. It’s just guess work, in the end. It’s just, “Yeah, that looks like what’s in the mirror, so I’ll stick with that.” It’s only this last one that…

    KP: That’s finally clicked?

    BROWN: Yeah. Probably because I see myself on TV now. I’ve actually got an image of that.

    KP: Do you think you have a perception of yourself outside of yourself? If that made any sense…

    BROWN: Well, I guess more so than before.

    KP: Is that perception of you as “you”, or do you perceive that as the “performer” version of you?

    BROWN: I think it depends on how messy my hair is, how confidently I’m staring at the camera… all that kind of thing. I think there’s a certain look and dress I associate with the performing me more than… or even having said that, I am wearing a suit at the moment, even though I don’t need to – though I do tend to wear suits in real life, as well. I don’t know…

    KP: Well, obviously you’re dressing up for the interviews.

    BROWN: (laughs) A perfectionist. In case you have some video thing that I don’t know about…

    KP: I saw you rearranging silverware at breakfast on the DVD features, so I know all about your perfectionism…

    BROWN: (laughs)

    KP: Any plans to take your live tour to the US at any point?

    BROWN: Well, I would love to. I mean, that’s certainly something to aim for. I think it’s just a question of if the series builds up a fan base and it feels right, then I would love to do a tour, do a Broadway run if possible. That would be great. They’ll love the way I sing. You’re a very diverse country. You know? I mean, in some ways you’re very homogenous, and in other ways… you’re hardly heterogeneous, if that’s the word. And it’s psychologically interesting as well, so it’s nice, with the show, to go to different areas. I’m sure how New Yorkers react to a camera – let alone what I’m doing – will be very different to going somewhere in kind of the Midwest or deep south. It’s a rich area, I think, and I think useful and good fun for the show, as well.

    KP: Hopefully we’ll come across better than we did in Messiah

    BROWN: (laughs) Yeah, I think… I don’t know if we’re using bits from that. No, we might just hold that back and have that as a special. Yeah, might need to soften it up a little bit.

    KP: Here’s hoping that you do make the transition. I think it’s been a long time coming.

    BROWN: Well, thank you, Ken. I really appreciate your support, and thank you for making people read the book. That’s lovely.

    KP: I do appreciate your time, and here’s hoping in the future we can finally do that in-depth interview that we’ve been trying to do for years.

    BROWN: That would be fantastic. I can’t wait to meet you one day…

    ##