Tag: John Hughes

  • Weekend Shopping Guide 3/13/15: Wonder Club

    weekendshopping.png

    The weekend’s here. You’ve just been paid, and it’s burning a hole in your pocket. What’s a pop culture geek to do? In hopes of steering you in the right direction to blow some of that hard-earned cash, it’s time for the FRED Weekend Shopping Guide – your spotlight on the things you didn’t even know you wanted…

    (Please support FRED by using the links below to make any impulse purchases – it helps to keep us going…)

    While DC Comics seems insistent on saddling their legendary superheroes with godawful redesign after godawful redesign, the fine folks at Sideshow continue to prove themselves exceptionally adept at presenting truly iconic versions of these characters in fine collectible form. The latest bit of awe comes in the premium format form of the Amazonian warrior herself, Wonder Woman ($399.99). Standing over 18″ tall atop a massive base, the sculpt is the quintessence of Diana, right down to the supremely confident pose. A truly wonderful piece.

    weekendpicks20150313-01.png

    weekendpicks20150313-02.png

    blankguide.gif

    It’s impossible – Impossible, I say! – that John Hughes’s The Breakfast Club (Universal, Rated R, Blu-Ray-$19.98 SRP) is celebrating its 30th anniversary. But, if it insists on making me feel so old, at least it’s doing so by getting a newly-remastered re-release, featuring a 12-part documentary, an audio commentary with Anthony Michael Hall & Judd Nelson, a trivia track, and a featurette on the legendary Brat Pack.

    blankguide.gif

    Following the Krang’s takeover of New York City, the Turtles take refuge in April O’Neill’s family cabin in the woods in Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Retreat! (Nickelodeon, Not Rated, DVD-$14.98 SRP), which collects the first 7 episodes of the show’s third season, plus seven “The Mutation Of A Scene” shorts”.

    blankguide.gif

    Shazam! Taking an Andy Griffith Show fan-favorite character and putting him in the military proved comic gold in the long-running spin-off Gomer Pyle U.S.M.C. (CBS, Not Rated, DVD-$59.98 SRP), starring Jim Nabors as the titular grunt and perpetual thorn in the side of the anger-prone and easily flustered Sergeant Carter. And now you can golly up to the complete 5 season run, plus audio commentaries, audio intros from Nabors, the backdoor pilot episode of The Andy Griffith Show, Nabors on The David Frost Show, and clips from The Lucy Show and The Jim Nabors Hour.

    blankguide.gif

    The epic arc of Avatar Korra comes to an end in The Legend Of Korra Book Four: Balance (Nickelodeon, Not Rated, Blu-Ray-$35.98 SRP), as she faces her greatest challenge in order to save the world, with surprising results. Bonus materials include 9 audio commentaries, a featurette, and the New York Comic-Con panel.

    blankguide.gif

    The passing of Robin Williams adds a poignancy to Night At The Museum: Secret Of The Tomb (Fox, Rated PG, Blu-Ray-$39.99 SRP), in what already feels to very much be constructed as the last outing in the franchise. As with the previous films, it’s a light, goofy, affable if slight affair, mainly buoyed by the larger-than-life character acting from the supporting roles, of which Williams’s Teddy Roosevelt is front and center. Bonus materials include an audio commentary, featurettes, and deleted/extended scenes.

    blankguide.gif

    The modern stone age family meets the modern stone age pastime in The Flintstones And WWE: Stone Age Smackdown (Warner Bros., Not Rated, Blu-Ray-$24.98 SRP), an original movie which finds Fred & Barney facing all of somebody’s favorite wrestling stars. Bonus materials featurettes and a pair of bonus cartoons.

    blankguide.gif

    They’re not my cup of pixie dust, but I know plenty of my friends’ kids adore the denizens of Pixie Hollow, and for them, there’s delight in the arrival of their latest animated adventure, Tinker Bell And The Legend Of The Neverbeast (Walt Disney, Rated G, Blu-Ray-$36.99 SRP). Tink and her bestie Fawn attempt to get to the truth behind the myth of an ancient creature and must protect it from their fellow fairies who fear it will bring nothing but destruction. Bonus materials include featurettes and deleted scenes.

    blankguide.gif

    Help your preschooler learn the basics with the 3-disc Blue’s Clues: Get Clued Into School Pack (Paramount, Not Rated, DVD-$16.99 SRP), featuring Blue’s explorations in the alphabet, shapes & colors, and school.

    blankguide.gif

    So there you have it… my humble suggestions for what to watch, listen to, play with, or waste money on this coming weekend. See ya next week…

    -Ken Plume

    ##

  • Weekend Shopping Guide 8/13/10: Kick-Ass

    weekendshopping.png

    The weekend’s here. You’ve just been paid, and it’s burning a hole in your pocket. What’s a pop culture geek to do? In hopes of steering you in the right direction to blow some of that hard-earned cash, it’s time for the FRED Weekend Shopping Guide – your spotlight on the things you didn’t even know you wanted…

    (Please support FRED by using the links below to make any impulse purchases – it helps to keep us going…)

    I really could have done without the over-the-top violence, because I actually found the story behind Kick-Ass (Lionsgate, Rated R, Blu-Ray-$39.99 SRP) to be pretty damn good, adapted from the comic book of the same name that envisions what it might be like for a real-life teen to decide to become a superhero-styled vigilante. What elevates it, though, is an impressive cast – including Nic Cage in the first flick in ages where I’ve actually enjoyed his presence. Bonus materials include an audio commentary, featurettes, a marketing archive, gallery, and a bonus standard DVD.

    thinkgeek-01.jpg

    In these dark, depressing, overheated days, there’s one thing that can still manage to bring a smile to even the most jaded countenance. I bet you’re wondering what I’m talking about. Why, I’m talking about Star Trek Interactive Tribbles ($14.99-$19.99), which vibrate and make all of the noises that Tribbles do, available in both a large and small size.

    thinkgeek-02.jpg

    It’s not often that you find a smart, funny kiddie comedy that’s just as enjoyable for the adults, and Diary Of A Wimpy Kid (Fox, Rated PG, Blu-Ray-$39.98 SRP) manages to achieve placement in that rarified air with a classic outsider tale that plays like a modern day Christmas Story. Bonus materials include featurettes and deleted diary pages.

    blankguide.gif

    While The Nightmare Before Christmas gets all of the attention, director Henry Selick’s stop-motion follow-up adaptation of Roald Dahl’s James and the Giant Peach (Walt Disney, Rated PG, Blu-Ray-$39.99 SRP) finally gets its time in the sun with a beautiful high definition transfer special edition, with a behind-the-scenes featurette and a music video.

    blankguide.gif

    Very rapidly, now, studios are cranking up their catalogue high definition conversions, which leads us to this week’s trio of releases from MGM – Kalifornia, Bull Durham, & the long-awaited Escape From New York (MGM, Rated R, Blu-Ray-$24.99 SRP each). Both Escape & Kalifornia are featureless, but Bull Durham comes with commentaries and a clutch of featurettes. All 3 releases come bundled with the standard definition DVD disc as well.

    blankguide.gif

    He made a lot of movies, but the most memorable ones are includes in the high definition Elvis: Blu-Ray Collection (Warner Bros., Rated G, Blu-Ray-$49.98 SRP). Not only does it include Jailhouse Rock and Viva Las Vegas, but also the concert film Elvis On Tour. As far as bonus materials go, both films contain making-of featurettes.

    blankguide.gif

    It’s slight and really doesn’t maintain itself very well, but Date Night (Fox, Rated PG-13, Blu-Ray-$39.99 SRP) does have the benefit of Steve Carrell and Tina Fey as its leads, as a humdrum married couple whose attempt at a night out goes quickly into action-packed farce mode after they impulsively grab another couple’s dinner reservation. Bonus materials include an audio commentary, featurettes, deleted scenes, PSAs, and a gag reel.

    blankguide.gif

    It’s not the films you generally think of when you hear his name, but there’s a nice look at the kind of films that sustained his career in the TCM Spotlight Errol Flynn Adventures collection (Warner Bros., Not Rated, DVD-$49.98 SRP). Included in the set are Desperate Journey, Edge Of Darkness, Northern Pursuit, Uncertain Glory, & Objective, Burma!. Bonus features include short subjects, newsreels, and trailers.

    blankguide.gif

    Want to know a lot about a certain subject in a fast, easy, and entertaining way? Well, the folks at The History Channel have marshaled their massive library into a new initiative of single-disc “Instant Expert” releases, each of which focuses on a single topic. The first batch to come down the pike include Ben Franklin, The Story Of Oil, Egypt, The Mayflower, The French Revolution, and Beowulf (History Channel, Not Rated, DVD-$14.95 SRP each).

    blankguide.gif

    David Starkey dives deep into the history of Britain’s ruling class in the documentary series Monarchy (Acorn, Not Rated, DVD-$79.99 SRP), taking viewers on a 1,500-year journey through power, blood, and battle.

    blankguide.gif

    Film criticism has been condensed down to its purest form in the collected release of Four Word Film Reviews (Adams Media, $9.95 SRP), in which Benj Clews and Michael Onesi summarize the likes of Jurassic Park with “Visitors feed the animals.” and Jaws with “Eat ship and die.”

    blankguide.gif

    Having recently acquired the rights to release Roy Budd’s scores, Silva Screen launches right in with a sparkling release of Budd’s score to the original Get Carter (Silva Screen Records, $12.98 SRP). Fans of the film and score aficionados alike will want to snap this up ASAP.

    blankguide.gif

    Long a favorite of tape-trading fans, the very lovely, little-seen 1984 documentary Henson’s Place (Lionsgate, Not Rated, DVD-$14.98 SRP) arrives on DVD and is worth a look by anyone who fancies themselves a Muppets fan. The disc also include a look at the 1885/86 Jim Henson Company Yearbook, with an introduction by Michael Frith.

    blankguide.gif

    It seems awfully soon after the Brit-centric, Frank Oz-helmed remake of just a few years ago, but the American audience got its own version of Death At A Funeral (Sony, Rated R, Blu-Ray-$34.95 SRP) which at least makes the smart decision of keeping Peter Dinklage on in what still amounts to a frothy, if slight, farce. Bonus materials include an audio commentary, featurettes, deleted scenes, and a gag reel.

    blankguide.gif

    So two volumes simply weren’t enough? Well, perhaps you’ll finally get your fill with Saturday Night Live: The Best Of Will Ferrell Volume 3 (Universal, Not Rated, DVD-$19.98 SRP), which is two more volumes than any of the original cast. Think about that for a moment.

    blankguide.gif

    It’s schlock of the utmost caliber, as Joe Dante rips off Jaws in the Roger Corman produced Piranha (Shout Factory, Rated R, Blu-Ray-$26.97 SRP), and it’s even goofier when you view it in high definition. Bonus features an audio commentary, featurettes, bloopers, radio/TV spots, trailers, and more.

    blankguide.gif

    Did you know that Hawaii Five-O ran for 12 seasons? I mean, by the time you get to Hawaii Five-O: Season 9 (Paramount, Not Rated, DVD-$49.99 SRP), it’s pretty much running on autopilot as Chin Ho, Danno, and Detective Steve McGarrett track down criminals on the Big Island of Oahu. The 6-disc set contains all 23 episodes.

    blankguide.gif

    Thanks to Charlie Brooker’s brilliant deconstruction of this soap opera dramatization on the loves and lives of the 19th century painters in question, I can’t really take Desperate Romantics (BBC, Not Rated, DVD-$29.98 SRP) too seriously. Perhaps you can. The 2-disc set contains a pair of featurettes.

    blankguide.gif

    While it makes me feel achingly old to see it’s the 25th anniversary edition, it is nice that John Hughes’ The Breakfast Club (Universal, Rated R, Blu-Ray-$26.98 SRP) has arrived in high definition, featuring an audio commentary, documentary, and a featurette on the origins of “The Brat Pack”.

    blankguide.gif

    Watch a once-promising show completely collapse under its own mismanagement and limp to a perfunctory demise via the 4th and final season of Heroes (Universal, Not Rated, DVD-$59.98 SRP). The 5-disc set contains all 18 episodes, plus audio commentaries, deleted/extended scenes, and featurettes. A Blu-Ray edition ($79.98 SRP) is also available, with the same bonus materials plus an exclusive featurette.

    blankguide.gif

    Proving that Sesame Street is all about following trends instead of setting them nowadays, their latest DVD release features Abby Cadabby in Sesame Street: P Is For Princess (Warner Bros., Not Rated, DVD-$14.98 SRP), which at least features Paul Rudd as a prince.

    blankguide.gif

    Oh, The 80’s. You gifted us with so much pop culture detritus that clogs every nook and cranny of the brains that lived through you. Included in that clutter is the short-lived TV series Max Headroom (Shout Factory, Not Rated, DVD-$49.97 SRP), whose 14 episodes are included in this new collector’s edition set. Bonus features include retrospective featurettes and a cast roundtable discussion.

    blankguide.gif

    Calling back to the likes of Voltron, Robotech, and Battle Of The Planets, Adult Swim’s Titan Maximum (Adult Swim, Not Rated, DVD-$19.98 SRP) is a stop-motion riff on that big robot pop culture well. Unfortunately, it doesn’t quite live up to the previous series from its creators, Robot Chicken. We’ll see if it gets its sea legs should it move forward. The disc contains 9 episodes, animatics, commentaries, featurettes, a table read, and more.

    blankguide.gif

    So there you have it… my humble suggestions for what to watch, listen to, play with, or waste money on this coming weekend. See ya next week…

    -Ken Plume

    ##

  • The Greatest Movie Blog Of All Time: The Time Traveler’s Wife & RIP Mr. Hughes

    greatestmovieblog.png

    THE TIME TRAVELER’S WIFE

    Many women accuse their husbands or boyfriends of being emotionally unavailable at one time or another.  “The Time Traveler’s Wife” is feminine sci-fi that postulates what if he had a really good excuse?

    Henry DeTamble (Eric Bana) is a great guy, a girl’s dream.: sensitive, smart, caring and attentive but has one major flaw: he just disappears from time to time.  “Yeah, it’s a problem” his wife Claire (Rachel McAdams) says nonchalantly to a concerned friend at one point in the film.  The time traveling “problem” for Henry started when he was in a car accident with his mother.  Different things seem to trigger the jumps such as stress, alcohol or even television, though none of these really seem to make a difference.  Henry has no control over when he’ll jump nor does he have control as to where or when his destination will be.

    timetravel

    The screenplay by Bruce Joel Rubin echoes his previous films, “My Life” and “Ghost”.  It’s a tender love story that deals with impossible what-ifs and impending loss.  It’s a well made film that never gets boring.  It’s rather clever and director Robert Schwentke (“Flightplan”) deftly handles Henry’s time jumping often with humor and frustration and never feels forced.

    The problem is, there isn’t a compelling case for Henry and Claire to be the great loves of each others lives.  Claire first meets Henry when she is a little girl and he appears to her naked (when you time travel you inconveniently don’t take your clothes with you which leads to a lot of petty theft and embarrassing situations for Henry.)  He appears to her many times in this meadow, she learns to leave a set of clothes for him, and at her young age he becomes her ideal man.  But what does she become for him?  He says she makes him feel “safe” and never alone.  Well, sure, okay, but what do these two have in common?  What do they like to do on a Saturday night?  Do they laugh at the same jokes?  These questions are never dealt with any satisfaction.

    Still, it’s a refreshingly original film and definitely worth checking out.

    JOHN HUGHES (1950 to 2009)

    John Hughes tragically died last week of heart attack in New York City while taking a morning walk, shocking the entertainment world and no doubt inspiring many John Hughes Film Festivals in living rooms across the globe.

    He was the Barry Sanders of filmmaking, he left in his prime and everyone hoped he would make a come back (Breakfast Club 2, Ferris Bueller’s Next Day Off, or 32 Candles even.)  Okay, maybe more accurately we all hoped he would return like Terrence Malick after a 20 year hiatus like he never left off.  But John Hughes just wasn’t that kind of filmmaker, he said his piece and was happy to walk away.

    CNSPhoto-John-Hughes

    As a kid growing up in the northwest suburbs of Chicago in the 1980’s, the films of John Hughes had a larger resonance for me and those I grew up with.  Hughes was a dedicated Chicagoan who was insistent on filming many of popular films in and around the Chicago area.  Great writers are great observers and Hughes was an exceptional observer of the human condition.

    Most remember Hughes as the voice of the mid-80’s teenager.  To say his best films are about teenage angst is myopic and blatantly however ignores two his best works: the always popular at Thanksgiving holiday, “Planes, Trains, and Automobiles” and the tragically underrated “She’s Having A Baby”.)

    No other filmmaker has had a run quite like Hughes.  Aside from the films he directed in rapid fire fashion (which I’ll get to), he wrote “Mr. Mom”, the “National Lampoon’s Vacation” films, “Pretty In Pink”, “Some Kind Of Wonderful”, “Home Alone”, “101 Dalmations”, and “The Great Outdoors”.  Those films alone are fairly impressive but from 1984 to 1989, Hughes wrote and directed SIX films that are truly memorable.

    Sixteen Candles (1984)

    “That’s why they call them crushes. If they were easy, they’d call them something else.” — Samantha’s Dad

    The film that put Hughes on the map as the auteur of teen angst in the 1980’s.  “Sixteen Candles” follows a day in the life of girl whose family forgets her sixteenth birthday while planning her older sister’s wedding.  It’s everything we’d come to expect from Hughes’s films: funny, honest, and heartfelt.

    The Breakfast Club (1985)

    “We’re all pretty bizarre. Some of us are just better at hiding it, that’s all.” — Andrew

    This film was ranked the #1 high school movie of all time by Entertainment Weekly.  It works because, unlike many films, it’s simple.  Hughes understood that you could say a lot about high school by breaking it down into the core cliques: the brains, the athletes, the basket cases, the princesses, and the criminals.  Then take a representative of each one of those social classes and throw them in all day Saturday detention and you have the makings of a great ensemble film, and “The Breakfast Club” was one of the best.  It would never have worked if you had two brains or two jocks or two criminals.  The film teaches us that while we may all seem different on the outside, if you separate us from our cliques, we realize that in the human condition we are quite similar.  Hughes understood that and that’s why this film is accessible to teens and adults alike.

    Weird Science (1985)

    “It’s a really long story Chet. Gary and I were messing around with the computer Friday night. We decided to make a woman and we did and she went crazy and she messed up the whole house.” — Wyatt

    Hughes supposedly wrote this film in 2 days and at times it feels like it.  But only a really talented director could make this preposterous plot work.  It’s a complete male fantasy: create the perfect woman with a model’s body and guy sensibilities.  And against all odds it completely works.  To me, it’s a film that suggests we learn to embrace imperfections in others.

    Ferris Bueller’s Day Off (1986)

    Life moves pretty fast. You don’t stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.  — Ferris Bueller

    This is my favorite of Hughes’s teen films because of it’s carpe diem ethic and unwavering optimism.  Plus, as a kid growing up in the suburbs of Chicago, I’ve taken more than a few days off in that wonderful city.

    AFA 196402

    In college I was asked to join a panel to discuss the film’s 10th anniversary and it’s impact.  At the time, and I think this still holds true, I observed that Cameron is really the main character of this story.  Cameron is the hero, the one who faces true adversity and inner demons coming out a changed, confident man at the end of the day.  It’s a story about friendship to me.

    Also, this film was supposedly written in 6 days.  Combine that with the 2 days Hughes used to write “Weird Science” and he had a pretty productive week.

    Planes, Trains, & Automobiles (1987)

    “You wanna hurt me? Go right ahead if it makes you feel any better. I’m an easy target. Yeah, you’re right, I talk too much. I also listen too much. I could be a cold-hearted cynic like you… but I don’t like to hurt people’s feelings. Well, you think what you want about me; I’m not changing. I like… I like me. My wife likes me. My customers like me. ‘Cause I’m the real article. What you see is what you get. ” — Del Griffith

    The first film directed by Hughes that featured adults and adult situations and to me, he doesn’t miss a beat.  As I said before, this is now a cult classic that gets a lot of spins on DVD players around Thanksgiving.  It’s relatable in that we’ve all been stranded somewhere at some point while traveling and we just want to get home.  I’ve always seen this as a film about patience.

    She’s Having A Baby (1988)

    “And in the end, I realized that I took more than I gave, I was trusted more than I trusted, and I was loved more than I loved. And what I was looking for was not to be found but to be made.” — Jake Briggs

    This is my favorite of Hughes’s films (edging out “Ferris Bueller’s Day Off”) mostly because it’s one that not a lot of people have seen.  I’m a fan of the hidden gem and this is one.  It’s a remarkable achievement in writing and filmmaking.  It’s one of Kevin Bacon’s best performances, one of Alec Baldwin’s earliest, and it’s hard to imagine Elizabeth McGovern didn’t skyrocket into the stratosphere off this film.  This was, in my opinion, the apex of Hughes’s directing talent.  Hop on YouTube and search for “This Woman’s Work” by Kate Bush, you’ll find the montage that sums up this film in the third act and if you don’t get moist in the eyes then you’re dead in the heart.

    I left out two other films that Hughes directed, “Uncle Buck” (1989) and “Curly Sue” (1991).  Both are fine films, but they also showed Hughes was running out of gas a bit.  Perhaps he blurted out what he wanted to say too fast and could never recover, though we always hoped he would just one more time.

    He was a unique writer and an underrated director (so few screenwriters understand film is a visual medium, but Hughes did.)  And his contributions to music (introducing America to British Pop for example) should not be underestimated.

    The great thing about film is that it’s forever.  Even though John Hughes has left us, his films live on.  Every year a new generation of teenager will discover “Sixteen Candles”, “The Breakfast Club”, and “Ferris Bueller’s Day Off”.  And every year a weary traveler will reminisce about how their journey home was in some way like “Planes, Trains, and Automobiles.”Â  And I hope expectant fathers discover “She’s Having A Baby”.

    Rest in Peace, Mr. Hughes.

    Brett Deacon will twitter (twitter.com/brettdeacon) the punchline to Bender’s joke about the blonde woman, the poodle, and the two foot salami.  Maybe.

  • Trailer Park: Charlyne Yi and Nick Jasenovec of PAPER HEART

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    I was able to sit down for a couple of years and pump out a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

    And now, you can follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

    Item #1

    john-hughes-01I would remiss if I didn’t mention the untimely passing of John Hughes.

    You will obviously seeing a lot of short articles about the ma’s impact on many of the thirty-somethings in Internet movie journalism and I would have to be included in that bunch.

    FERRIS BUELLER’S DAY OFF was an anthem, really, to suburbanite kids like me who understood Hughes’ aesthetic on the adolescent desire to just take some time out for yourself. SIXTEEN CANDLES was a movie that I am thankful for seeing in the theater as a young kid. I knew it was a funny then and I know it’s a funny movie now. I even remember having my father taking my brother and I to see PLANES, TRAINS AND AUTOMOBILES. All three of these cinematic experiences were a delight and stood in stark contrast to the critical reception his films received at the hands of critics who would eat their words so many years after they realized what John Hughes was doing with his movies.

    I know it sounds like a plug, and if it was online to read to free I would share it here, but if you happen to see Geek Monthly’s August issue with Seth Green on the cover I delve in deeper to John’s movies as I chart the course of some documentary filmmakers who made their own film, DON’T YOU FORGET ABOUT ME, which uses new interviews with the film’s cast and creators to tell how they were inspired by John’s work.

    He may have been gone for decades but that hasn’t made his passing any less easy to those of us who could quote endlessly from his films. There’s a reason why we’re able to do that and it doesn’t have anything to do with their accessibility; he was a gifted writer and filmmaker who was able to distill the experiences of teenage life and, eventually, older age.

    He will be missed.

    Item #2

    rippedoffmadoffdvd-nsBernie Madoff.

    There is a moment on the DVD of Ripped Off: Madoff and the Scamming of America where Bernie is talking to a class full of business hopefuls how he feels about governmental regulation and, essentially, how he feels about finance in general. Not only is it hilarious but it’s a fascinating snapshot into the mind of a man who no doubt knew what he was doing at the time he was guiding the minds of those eager to plunder the riches found in high paying financial jobs. The man, who would get convicted of stealing billions upon billions of dollars, is the perfect model upon which this documentary is set against and thankfully so.

    The world of economics, especially to people like me who are allergic to the point needing an EpiPen when opening the Business section of my local newspaper, is one shrouded in highfalutin linguistics that purposely confuse rubes like me who have to surrender to the “expert” guidance of those who are entrusted with doing the right thing. Regulation couldn’t help those who Bernie Madoff swindled and honestly this documentary puts everything into a perspective that helps to show how even those who are already smarter than a lot of us got taken as well.

    Ripped Off should be one that everyone who wants to understand this economic crisis from an angle divested from the talking heads who want to blame one party or the other. I didn’t get robbed of any money and this program spoke to me in a language that even I could grasp. I’m not afraid to admit that I need my information served to me in ways that helped me understand credit issues in MAXED OUT or the obesity problem in SUPER SIZE ME.

    There is something delicious to Madoff being sentenced to 150 years in prison after you see the wide swath of destruction left in his paper trail. Ripped Off proves why 150 years isn’t punishment enough for this confidence man.

    PAPER HEART – Interview
    pageimage-350945-1551604-paper_heart_poster_virbThose looking for love won’t ever find it and those who don’t believe it exists never had a child who dotes on them. It’s a slippery thing, love, when you think about the way it finds some and the way it ignores others. Growing up, I was enchanted by films like ONE CRAZY SUMMER and BETTER OFF DEAD by director Savage Steve Holland or the suite of films from John Hughes where characters were placed into every embarrassing situation as it pertains to the courting rituals of the modern American teen. As you head into older age, it would follow, should “love” be as elusive as it was during the awkward years of prepubescence you would start developing the jagged edges of those burnt-out on bad relationships while developing an acute distaste for all things sweet and lovey-dovey.

    In steps Charlyne Yi and Nick Jasenovec.

    Their film, PAPER HEART, looks to take the stance that love needs some defining in an age where over 50% of marriages end in divorce and where hearts are broken at breakneck speed every minute of the day across this land of ours. The documentary blurs the lines of fiction and truth but with an emotion that is as bizarre and weirdly nebulous as love the structure of the film is wonderfully suited to best strip down this most basic of emotions.

    Charlyne Yi and Nick Jasenovec stopped in Phoenix to talk about their film and to discuss the construction of the best docu-fiction motion picture you’ll see all year.

    CHRISTOPHER STIPP: Looking at the film’s promotional poster and reading previous interviews where the idea of the movie crew being in the movie wasn’t always factored in…was it a conscious choice to blur the line between documentary and fiction?

    NICK JASENOVEC: Well we did know. We were shooting with two cameras and shooting spontaneously and shooting in that manner you knew that occasionally you were going to capture a crew on camera and people that weren’t necessarily part of the scene. So we knew that we would have it but we didn’t want to make them an integral part of the story line. We didn’t want to rely on that. We had scenes in the outline where the camera crew kind of gets in the way of things and sort of effects the relationship but we didn’t want it to be a main focus but then when we got to the editing room and saw the footage, it was the most clear conflict in the movie. Because we didn’t make a traditional film so there’s not a – Charlene cheats on Mike and Mike find out and they break up but then she comes back to him. So there was no sort of fake plot points, so it was really kind of an easy going film from start to finish so when we found conflict in the editing room we decided to jump on that and make that the focus.

    CS: How did you come up with the treatment?

    NICK JASENOVEC: It started with Charlene.

    CHARLYNE YI: Originally I wanted to make a traditional ““ I keep wanting to say “straight” documentary but that seems sexual.

    (Laughs)

    I wanted to make a traditional documentary about love inspired by people I’ve met in my life that opened up to me about their love stories. Most movies to have a sort of love relationship in the film and why not make one about real stories and there’s so much more meaning to them because they are real. So I came to Nick with that idea and Allison was kind of skeptical about love at the time and from there he said, “You should go on camera.” I didn’t know about that.

    paperheart2009sundanceportraitsessionholaw6bjga5lJASENOVEC: It made sense because she performs all around Los Angeles and is comfortable on stage and everything. She’s really funny and charming and she has a unique comedic voice so it just made sense. A lot of our favorite documentaries always feature the document writer on camera in the primary role and once I found out how she felt about love I thought the audience should really experience the journey through her eyes. Because she had these specific feelings and that’s what drives the film. So once we decided that we started working on the idea and came up with the sort of scripted story line to tie everything together and give the story some sort of arch for Charlene and just for story line.

    CS: Exactly…and that leads into the question about how it started with just a few pages. I read that an hour before shooting you would huddle together and started hammering things out. Did you notice an evolution of what was happening as each shoot ““ an hour before shooting ““ any trends? Or was it literally as random as it appears?

    JASENOVEC: It was. Sometimes we’d beat it out and start shooting and someone would say, it’s not working.

    YI: Yea, and then we’d have to have another meeting.

    (Laughs)

    JASENOVEC: But then other times you would have no idea and have to wing it and then it would turn out great.

    YI: And you find that through improvising it worked.

    JASENOVEC: The movie itself has to feel ““ both halves of the movie have to feel equal. The have to feel of the same cloth. So like all the scenes where Charlene or Michael or Jake are acting have to feel they were captured just like the documentary. So, improve was just the obvious choice just to keep things fresh.

    YI: And organic.

    JASENOVEC: Unscripted. Doesn’t feel like they were reading lines from something. It was always different. I don’t remember patterns really but there were times where ““ I remember a scene in the film where they were driving out to Joshua Tree on the drive out to Palm Springs. That was just supposed to be one of the many dates. But instead it just naturally came out, Michael had the idea that I don’t think my character would be very excited about bring the cooler along. So that became the focus of the scene. So there were tons of surprises.

    YI: And then in the editing room it became the focus of the movie how ““ a relevant scene that would help the arch.

    JASENOVEC: I can’t remember what interview we talked about what.

    CS: Everyone is trying to be different.

    JASENOVEC: These are different questions.

    YI: The questions are relevant.

    JASENOVEC: Yeah, but I’m just trying to remember what we said in which one. Like, oh shoot, did we cover that in this one.

    CS: “What lie did we tell?”

    (Laughs)

    JASENOVEC: Yeah, we have to keep all our lies straight.

    (Laugh)

    paperheart2009sundanceportraitsession0ojbnz8tpi-lCS: Now that begs the question, when you had about 300 hours footage and you said, “OK, we have 300 hours and we need to make a movie that’s 90 minutes and change.” Where do you start? Obviously you start with your story.

    JASENOVEC: The first thing we put together was no documentary stuff just Charlene setting out to make the movie, meeting Michael, starting the relationship, whatever happens happens. The relationship story line. That’s an easier way to put it. And that alone without any documentary stuff I think was over 2 hours. So we knew that that wasn’t going to work.

    (Laughs)

    We knew it had to be half and half and then had to get it down to about 45 minutes. So think from there, we definitely had a lot of stuff, but that was where the conflict of the cameras impeding the relationship really stood out, so we made that the focus. We restructured and got it down to about an hour and then started cutting the documentaries interviews together and started putting them in place and looking at which interviews would fit in which parts of the movie and it was just all different too. Because you would think that you would want to put an interview in a scene to comment on that scene, but when we showed it to people, not only did they not catch it but it felt like everything was in the wrong place. So a lot of the scenes, to me, the documentary interviews feel like some of them should more obviously be closer to the scenes but they aren’t. Oh like the puppet stuff, the recreations. Remember we took the themes of the four and this was the first meeting, the early part of the relationship and it didn’t work at all.

    YI: Yes. It’s hard to pinpoint why it didn’t work. It’s like the energy of the scene and then”¦

    JASENOVEC: There’s probably 100 different versions of this movie. It’s just like a giant jigsaw puzzle. Especially with the documentary stuff. The story line, once you figure that out, that’s going to stay the same but where do you put the documentary stuff. What interviews go where? It was interesting.

    CS: Who decided to make the cut and who didn’t, especially when you are trying to select the best pieces?

    JASENOVEC: Almost everyone made the cut. Some were shorter than others just based on what the relevant information was or maybe how interesting the information was. We definitely had favorites and least favorites. Not to say that it’s a personal film but just in terms of how it works in the movie. There’s a couple that didn’t make it in. And then the ones that did, yea. Each interview is probably an hour, an hour and a half long so we had to boil that down to what was the core idea of each interview and tie it into the story line.

    YI: We had a set of general and specific questions applying to the scientist.

    JASENOVEC: And also certain interviews were approached based on where ““ different interviews were approached in different ways. For this interview, let’s do this one where Charlene and Michael have been together for a little while so there’s a comfort there and can talk about that relationship in this interview.

    YI: And hopefully give advice.

    JASENOVEC: Yeah, and then another interview she would just be approaching it from where she is at the beginning of the film so that also dictated some of the order. If we chose to use anything that was specific.

    YI: Yeah.

    JASENOVEC: Just thinking back on it”¦

    YI: Gives me a headache

    (Laughs)

    JASENOVEC: It was a pretty miserable time. I remember the first time we lost our first cut we were like, what have we made? This is never going to make it.

    YI: We were so depressed. We were just sad eating.

    (Laughs)

    paper-776369CS: Does it help that you guys did this independently?

    YI: Most definitely. I think if people saw the 300 hours of footage people wouldn’t understand what we made.

    JASENOVEC: Because we would just keep the cameras rolling. We would try things that didn’t work a lot of the times. We didn’t have to show footage to anybody. No one was looking over our shoulders. We did have a weekly budget and we had a bond company. So as long as we stayed in budget and were getting the footage that we thought we needed, we were OK. No one from the financiers saw the movie until we were finished with it.

    YI: I can’t imagine if we did get input. That would have destroyed the film.

    JASENOVEC: It was confusing enough trying to figure it out on your own but if you have other outside people telling you what to do, I don’t think we would have discovered anything we discovered.

    YI: And there’s already so much pressure. Like us being on the road running constantly trying to nail shots, getting kicked out of places because we don’t have permits”¦so it was difficult.

    JASENOVEC: We were really lucky.

    CS: Your and Michael’s chemistry on the screen was really great. Did you find that your two comedy styles. Well, I shouldn’t say styles but Michael came into this and you guys had to make it work. I don’t want to ask a stupid question like, “Was it easy to do?”

    (Laughs)

    But did you find that you two complement each other?

    YI: I think we all have the same sense of humor. You [Nick], me, Jake and Michael.

    JASENOVEC: We are all friends so we’re all comfortable around each other so that helps. So there was no bad idea.

    YI: There was no, “Let’s do it my way.” We were, “Yeah, let’s do that. Let’s try it.”

    JASENOVEC: And I think that Charlene and Michel both love twisting realities and playing with the audience’s perceptions and stuff. When we came up with the idea of the movie we knew that Mike was perfect. He loves doing stuff like this. And knew that we would all be on the same page. There were very few disagreements.

    YI: The only disagreement was when he was complaining that he didn’t have enough raisins.

    JASENOVEC: Which was often. Every day.

    YI: Every hour.

  • Trailer Park: DON’T YOU FORGET ABOUT ME

    By Christopher Stipp

    The Archives, Right Here

    I was able to sit down for a couple of years and pump out a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

    And now, you can follow me on TWITTER under the name: Stipp

    parker_2305One of the things that instantly sprang to mind this past week when the first ever pictures of Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick with their new brood hit the public hungry for celebrity photos wasn’t that here was a gorgeous family. No, my first reaction was, “When did Ferris Bueller start sporting mutton chops and a swooping, graying bob of a haircut that makes him look like an extra in a stage production of The Pirates of Penzance?”

    I am fully indoctrinated into the lasting effects of John Hughes’ films.

    One of the things that I’ve been working on for the past almost 2 and a half years is chasing down a story about a gaggle of filmmakers who went out to find out whether John Hughes still strikes a chord with today’s youth, decades after he made the core of his adolescent oeuvre, and to opine with some of the film’s stars about the process of working with the man who would be permanently a part of many teens who are now grown adults.

    What is striking about this is what while it’s taken such a long, long, long time to finally have a story to write about for you all to read about is that this couldn’t have been a more appropriately fitting story to share with an audience who has come this way via Kevin Smith, not only an appreciator of Hughes’ work but who makes an appearance in this documentary, DON’T YOU FORGET ABOUT ME. The four filmmakers who put themselves at the center of this film, Matt Austin, Michael Facciolo, Kari Hollend and Lenny Panzer, go out on a road trip to put together the legacy of what made Hughes so influential to them, to those who have seen his films, and to make their way to his front door. Literally.

    This is merely the beginning of a multi-part interview series with the film’s creative nerve center and to hopefully get all of you interested enough to pick up next month’s 80’s themed issue of GEEK MONTHLY magazine where I have written a full piece on this. As well, if you want some behind the scenes/on the cutting room floor snippets of the documentary please feel free to patronize these filmmakers’ blog right here. They are planning release this as a movie you’ll be able to directly buy but until that happens please enjoy the conversation below.

    johnCHRISTOPHER STIPP: Where to begin? It’s probably best to start where you and everyone else came together to want to do this.

    KARI HOLLEND: Matt and Lenny were the ones who came up with the idea this was their brain child. The two of them were working on writing a script together and they were trying to write a good coming of age teenage story and they started talking and obviously when you are going down that road John Hughes comes to mind and it sort of provoked the question ““ “What ever happened to the guy?”

    What ever happened to films like those and it became the bigger question and once they started talking about it they realized like there is no way we could ever write a script close to John Hughes ““ here’s an idea ““ why don’t we go figure out where the guy is. So I get a call from Matt who already had Michael and Lenny – at that time they were all actors as well. I am the only outcast who doesn’t act, or you could say sane person, and I get this call from Matt who I met once or twice and he’s like, “Kari, I have to come visit you at your office. I have this idea but need to pitch it to you in person.” So he came by but the original pitch of the documentary in the end is ironic ““ they had proposed that the four of us get on a bus ““ they wanted me to get on board and be a producer with them and then we get on a bus for two weeks and we travel across to Lake Forest, which is where John Hughes lives and we go to deliver a script to John Hughes and along the way we find out if anyone knows who he is, does anyone remember his films fondly, where do they fit in the world today? So I was kind of like, “You know what? I don’t really know you guys that well. I’m not getting on a fucking bus for two weeks to live on a school bus and I don’t really see that thing entertaining. I do like the idea of the John Hughes idea. Why don’t we work from there and formulate it?” We sort of left it at that and thought of who we could interview. Three days later we had Ally. She was our first yes and we are forever grateful.

    CS: That’s wild.

    HOLLEND: It was so fucked up. We were like, “OK, this is crazy.” I will just throw things out there and see what happens. I said, “Why don’t we see if anyone will even talk to us?” So, this was February of ’06 by the way. Then Matt emails me and says there is this John Hughes film festival at the University of Maryland in March. We should go check it out. So we thought it was really crazy that these university kids are having this film festival because that means they are aware and here becomes the beginning, the evolution of what our original thesis is and part of it today which is do people today relate to the Hughes films and do they relate to films of that genre today. So sure enough, we drive to Maryland ““ our first road trip of many ““ and that was really a big bonding experience for us. We didn’t really know each other that well. So we get in the car in March and in Toronto it’s still really snowy and kind of gross and Spring is looming and it’s around the corner and we drive to Maryland and it’s all beautiful and blossomed and warm and we get to the picturesque American town and University actually the town wasn’t so picturesque it was kind of ghetto but the University was beautiful and sure enough, we started talking to all these teenagers who started to unload on us about how they don’t make films like this any more, what’s wrong with Hollywood, we hate all the films today, we can’t relate to anyone. I believe one of the first quotes we got was “I relate to Molly Ringwald more than Jessica Alba ““ I just don’t look like that.”

    I’ve seen those films 100’s of times and they talked about where they saw them and it was either a hand down from their parents or TV. It was just a part of their world. You almost didn’t meet one person on that campus in their early 20’s who hadn’t seen some or all of the Hughes films. So, then it was like, “OK, we’re on to something, let’s do this documentary.” That March road trip was the kickoff.

    And even though the University was behind this film festival it was students who were running it and I think it showed us the voice is coming from the kids. It wasn’t the teachers saying let’s do this film festival for John ““ it was the kids, the students, saying this was important.

    And just to give you some insight none of us had ever done a documentary before. In the name of Kevin Smith, we said fuck it, he says to credit card it, let’s just keep going and rack up enough debt until we run out of money, someone will give us money. So at this point we had no funding. We were just like GO. We didn’t even have preproduction. We went from pitch to production. So you can imagine now as more experienced filmmakers we realize the importance of development and preproduction are so imperative and we basically did everything ass backwards. And it has made for a very entertaining line. So here we are again without a penny to our names, we all have our credit cards and what is in our bank accounts and we start to proceed and so begins the huge list, everyone we tried to contact and how we got all the interviews and what it took to get them.

    MICHAEL FACCIOLO: And you know, following up on what she’s saying one of the things that after she said yes it kind of became a real snowball effect.

    CS: How did you find that getting answers to how these unknowns became known actors?

    HOLLEND: We got to interview Jackie Burch who was the casting director for 16 Candles and Breakfast Club.

    She mentioned how the Jake Ryan character almost wasn’t cast ““ all these stories about how she found these kids and Judd Nelson’s character Bender ““ wore the clothes he was wearing to the audition. The clothes that he wore in the Breakfast Club ““ his character – was a direct reflection of who he was during the audition. He wasn’t a known actor yet and Jackie was one of our first yes’s and she gave us this incredible interview. Everyone who came on board was very generious two of the biggest ones, Louise Ward and Pam Silverstien. They both came on board early on and helped to shepherd us as did Jackie. They put out their feelers and were really supporting us. My first call to Louise ““ she’s this amazing woman, very intelligent, and has the craziest vocabularies she asked me, “So, who else do you have?” And at that point I think I only had Ally and someone else and she was like, “Oh honey. You need some help ““ you can’t go calling people and tell them that you have one person. Don’t you have John Hughes?”

    That is when she took pity on us and decided to shepard us.

    sixteenCS: When you first started rolling tape and you don’t have a real thesis in mind other than to find out the cultural impact of John Hughes, what were you finding in your dailies and going back finding out what people were saying, were there any surprises when you started to take a look at the footage?

    FACCIOLO: When we looked back at the footage? Like what was the feeling of the responses we were getting while it was happening?

    CS: Right. Anything your were assuming going in that maybe you weren’t …

    HOLLEND: We started to ask, “Where did you go, John Hughes, in the middle of Hollywood?” People are not happy. Not just the people working in the system but people who are going to see films and paying $20.00 plus for the experience and coming out really unfulfilled. We went back to the drawing board…how a film gets made ““ we almost had too much to talk about. For example, we met with a guy and this is already a year and a half into it who does market research for the studios and talked about the process now vs. then. “You could never make Breakfast Club now in a studio,” he said, “One location. All dialogue. It’s like, where’s the sex, drugs, everything, you know?” So, really the idea of how Hollywood changed became a focus point. We didn’t have any studio executives as it was difficult to get them on camera and then halfway though we finally got some to sit down with us to talk about how the system has changed. , I don’t think that’s coming back into the documentary because that veers into a whole other film we will show some of the footage on our blog.

    We started to realize that what was going to make our film better was to let things be assumed and not hit them over the head. So by hearing teenagers say “I’m not happy” and hearing the actors talk about what it took to make the films back then one would assume you could put A plus B equals C because in those messages it says, “We’re not happy.” You got your audience and the industry saying things have changed.

    But we don’t want to beat them over the head with it in the film. You either pick it up or you don’t.

    CS: So what was the genesis of tracking down John Hughes?

    FACCIOLO: Basically, after we interviewed all sorts of people, it became pretty clear that the one thing we were missing…there is a little bit of sub story to this…Kari and I went over to David Anderlie’s house in Los Angeles, who was the music supervisor for Hughes, and he was the head of A&M Records at the time and was responsible, along with Hughes, for making popular a lot of those bands in the 80’s….

    HOLLEND: Simple Minds

    FACCIOLO: Simple Minds, Echo and The Bunnymen, all those guys, and he happens to be neighbors with Judd Nelson. I mean, next door neighbors.

    HOLLEND: Literally next door. Like, “Hey, buddy, here’s your mail in the morning. How’s it going Judd?”

    FACCIOLO: So Judd did an interview with us for the film, and Kari and I were like, “There’s Judd Nelson sitting in the yard.” And if you were want to know about his yard, he’s got gargoyles and Barbie with her head cut off handing from his front door as a chime.

    HOLLEND: He’s a dark guy.

    FACCIOLO: So anyway we convinced him to come down to our edit suite and we would screen the film for him. So he sat there and watched the film. He didn’t say a word really. He sat there pretty quiet through the whole thing. This was one of the earlier cuts in the film.

    But this was before our road trip idea. So at the end of it, he sat there for quite a while and after about 10 minutes he changed. And the first thing out of his mouth was, “I want to hear about you guys. I want to hear about these people that were passionate enough and felt it important enough to find answers to these questions.” And on Kari’s, we’ll call it her 29th birthday, it became clear that what we needed to do was go find John Hughes himself.

    HOLLEND: It was my 31st birthday.

    FACCIOLO: So that was the genesis for the road trip. Us understanding that we had to go and find the man himself.

    HOLLEND: It was important to us….we kind of came at this road trip from a few different perspectives. One being that that was the original idea. I said no to two weeks on a bus with these guys and it ended up being Deal / No Deal and I always refer to that because I chose the wrong suitcase. I said no to two weeks so I sign up for three fucking years on the road without ever realizing what I’m getting into. So we said we’re going to pack ourselves into a van and come at this with a bit of an apology. We’re coming at this from a place, it’s been three and a half years, we were four inexperienced filmmakers, we’ve done everything wrong and right at the same time and the one thing after 21 cuts of our film, 80 hours of footage, make blood, sweat and tears literally, 3 of us got married over the course of this film, one of us, two of the guys ““ their wives are about to have babies, our executive producer producer had twins ““ so many things have happened with our personal lives, so many things have happened. But this film is us coming to the audience and saying here we are 3 and a half years later. But this film is us coming to the audience and saying here we are two and a half years later, x amount of money in the hole, in debt ““ we feel like the thing left to do now because one of the questions that came out through the documentary is, “Did you get to Hughes and did you try?” And we felt like now is our time. Now is the time to get on the road and do this and to tell you where we’re coming from because we did make a lot of mistakes doing this and we’re coming to you almost naked saying, “Here’s our story, here’s how it happened, why it happened and we think without our story intertwined in this it doesn’t have as much potency, it doesn’t have as much heart.” And this road trip really shows the heart of the film in two days, which is ironic again because all of Hughes’s films take place over: a) a journey and b) a very short time. Breakfast Club, an afternoon, 16 Candles, the birthday, Weird Science, a weekend when the parents went out of town, Ferris Bueller’s Day Off. So this is our little version of our Hughes experience.

    CS: But, it wasn’t planned like that.

    HOLLEND: No, it wasn’t planned like that. We realized it after and over the course of this weekend of us driving in a van and searching through Lake Forest to find him and all the discoveries that happened, again, tensions are high. It’s been two and a half years, we all have very different personalities, which certainly come out and we all have conflicting ideas and a lot of this came out on camera. This road trip was a linchpin ““ a beginning, middle and end. We start at the end and sort of preface what is about to be shown which is the conversation that happens in all the interviews and then you sort of follow us and wonder ““ do they get him? Do they get to Hughes? That’s the question of the whole film.

    hughes3-182-of-340-1CS: That aside, about whether or not you talk to him and whether or not you had any conversation with him, what were some of the thoughts and reflections on some of the people you talked to as to why he made all these really rock solid films and then just pulled a J.D. Salinger?

    FACCIOLO: It came out he was always an outcast. I don’t think ever really cared to be a part of that Hollywood scene and don’t think he enjoyed it much. He directed to protect the material. He’s a writer. He’s always been a writer. As Kevin Smith said, F.U. guys. “You’re lucky if your filmmaker gives you one good film.” It’s like “I gave you 5 good teen films” how much more do you expect him to give? You’re selfish if you do ask for more, that sort of thing. Going back to the JD Salinger thing, it’s funny ““ it comes up a lot. Him being a recluse.

    But then all of a sudden we drive into this town where he lives in, which is this beautiful Norman Rockwell type town. He lives in this absolutely beautiful house. He’s happily married to his high school sweetheart. He’s a family man now and is certainly not a recluse within his own home. We met his mailman, we met his pizza man. He’s living his life which is one of the conclusions I got that is directly related to his last teen film that he directed, and in my opinion, this quote that I will say gives his most adult advice without the actors saying it or showing it ““ life moves pretty fast. If you don’t stop and look around you are going to miss it.

    He was just taking his own advice.

    HOLLEND: As a teenager and adolescent you can never have the foresight to understand what that really means. You only understand that as you get older. And for the most part we all get greedy. We want more and more and more. And he’s sort of saying, you know what? My pockets are pretty full right now. I have this incredible life. He’s got quite a lot of money in the bank. Maybe he’s just not hungry anymore. Like Andrew McCarthy, he took his bat and ball and went home. He’s living a wonderful, beautiful life. So, to me, he’s not a recluse. He’s just living off the fruits of his labor and basically hanging it up when it’s time to retire and enjoying retirement.

    FACCIOLO: Do you want to hear my theory?

    CS: Yes.

    FACCIOLO: He’s coming back.

    Just like Edmond Dantes, from the Count of Monte Cristo, and he’s been quoted as saying he’s going to have the last laugh. And I don’t know… Are you familiar with the story of the Count of Monte Cristo?

    CS: He eventually comes back and…..

    FACCIOLO: Yeah, he takes revenge on people who have harmed him. So, if you ask me, John Hughes’s story is the story of Edmond Dantes.

    HOLLEND: I wouldn’t agree with that necessarily and I think it’s a little convoluted. I think he’ll come back. I don’t think he’s as bitter as people think. Michael says he writes as Edmond Dantes which is not really true. He uses that as an alias. But all the things that have been rewritten with his name, those are stories he wrote 20 years ago. The only thing they gave the writers for Drillbit Taylor was the pitch. High school nerds hire a bodyguard to help protect them from a bully. They never got to see the original treatment, which is John’s. He just got the story idea. The majority of stuff you see with his name on it, other than Edmond Dantes, are things he wrote years ago ““ taking things out of the vault. So he hasn’t really written anything new in years. It’s all old stuff of his from the vault.

    CS: Why does his last few movies feel so different, in your own opinions? Why does his last couple efforts didn’t have the same kind of feel, the same kind of resonance as his other films?

    HOLLEND: In my opinion, he was hired to do a job. The other ones came from him. I think it’s fair to say the ones that came from his heart and his mind were the ones that had the most pull. The other ones that he started just working for a studio ““ make us more money, make us more money here’s the idea ““ Go ““ I think that’s when, and there’s a great interview, that he starts to become disingenuous. That’s when it starts to fall apart because those weren’t his ideas. I think he writes very much from experience and from his own personal thoughts and his heart. Asking him to write something he’s not connected to, I think you get a combination of a big blockbuster hit that appeals to the masses but doesn’t really resonate with anyone.

    FACCIOLO: If I had a hundred million dollars in my bank account and I never had to work again ““ I don’t know how that would affect me as an artist but I think it would affect me someway.

    CS: Talk to me about the interviews. You probably got from students how important he was ““ his films are obviously different than the teen films we get today ““ which are really not very good ““ whether that’s us waxing nostalgia or whether that’s the absolute truth ““ what were you finding from the actors, the players, what are some interesting tales of how John Hughes orchestrated his film sets?

    HOLLEND: I think one of the most interesting things was how he treated them. He was really a collaborator. He was very open. He would talk to them on their level rather than pandering down to them which was very apparent because it comes across on screen. He’s not talking down to his audience. He would let these kids, because they were essentially kids at the time, be very much a part of the process and contribute to their characters.

    hughes3-195-of-340-12FACCIOLO: And you know, he was a writer. Before he was a director I think his true talent was in writing, and as director Howard Deutch said, he directed to protect the writing a lot of the time.

    HOLLEND: I think what we found was they appreciated his willingness to let them go where they needed to go. And the other thing, every single person talked about music. Judd Nelson said the thing was, “he was getting it from somewhere.” He knew what we were listening to before we were listening to it.” He was just amazing at getting inside the minds of these teenagers at the age of 35. I remember, Ally talked about how at one point on the Breakfast Club he would go up to each one of them and say, “You are playing me.” Each one of them were playing a character that he played or that he was in high school. I just think he was open and collaborative.

    He wasn’t afraid to say I don’t know.

    Judd Nelson said that. All of a sudden, overnight ““ I’m paraphrasing what Judd Nelson said ““ overnight somebody in this day and age becomes a director and all of a sudden that means they know everything there is to know about editing, everything there is to know about sound, they know everything there is to know about color-correction, which is isn’t the case. And I think John was very open and surrounded himself with the right people and saying, “I don’t know, what do you think?” That’s an important lesson and I think that’s something that now with everyone being a filmmaker, with You Tube and the digital age, everyone thinks they knows what it takes and I think one of the biggest things, as an artist or filmmaker, is being able to say, I don’t know.

    FACCIOLO: You know it’s funny, if you watch The Breakfast Club you see so many similarities between David Lee’s films ““ obviously completely different right? But, David Lee is known for taking his actors and giving them a year’s worth of preparation on their character. So while we met and talked to these actors who took part in his films, they understood those characters in such a deep, intrinsic level that it was easy to go off the dialogue and it was easy to create really good stuff because they were so into the character and so into the process and I think, like Kari was saying, I think he instilled a little bit of himself into each of those characters.

    And Howard Deutch talked about he’s almost a freak in his genius. Howie Deutch directed Some Kind of Wonderful and Pretty in Pink and one night he said, again, paraphrasing, he was on John’s couch and they were in production supposed to be doing some rewrites for Some Kind of Wonderful and 5 hours later John comes up with 50 pages and he hands it to Howie and he said “What are you doing man? I thought you were supposed to be doing some rewrites?” and he said, “I was but read this.” And it ended up being the first 50 pages of Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, that he wrote in a matter of hours.

    CS: How was John Hughes able to make his films feel so intimate?

    HOLLEND: I think there was a combination of things and this is where it helps to talk to people like Jackie Burch for starters, regarding casting. She cast real teenagers. They were really people you would see in high school. Look at Anthony Michael Hall ““ he looked like a 16 year old boy. Today, they don’t. And all these glamorous lives and cars and toys that everyone has in films today ““ it’s not like that everywhere. He hit it on the head and made it available not just for the rich and famous living in LA and New York. He lived in the middle of nowhere. He’s got the weird aunts, got the grandparents feeling you out during puberty. He painted all these details It’s what everyone relates to. With broad strokes, everyone can laugh and it’s funny. It’s the heart of the matter that makes you say, “I could be that person or I understand what that person is going through.” And, by making these films in Chicago, in Northbrook or Shermer, or some fictitious place we’ve been to three times, he really painted a picture of what so many people lives are actually like.

    FACCIOLO: And I think if you go back to his hometown and you spend just 20 minutes in that town, you just know, you understand where these characters came from. They are real people. John Hughes didn’t grow up in a wealthy neighborhood. He grew up on the outskirts of a wealthy suburb of Chicago, which he now lives in.

    ferrisHOLLEND: It’s a combination ““ the setting, the costumes, the characters, the writing, the directing.

    FACCIOLO: I think the writing was the biggest thing. He was able to speak the language that people understood.

    People at the time didn’t ““ Mia Sara during her interview said, “I had no idea, I had no idea at the time that this was going to be such an anthem-like film.” None of them realized at the time that these films would carry them throughout their entire lives. One of them said “Yeah, I had an idea that it would be big as it was” but they had no clue.

    HOLLEND: And they still get fan mail today. Andrew McCarthy had a great quote, “It was our objective in that day as an actor, to just be a good actor and to get a job. The focus was not on wearing the most designer outfits. One weekend I’m auditioning for Weekend at Bernies, the next I’m auditioning for Pretty in Pink. It was about doing a good job.” It wasn’t about ““ their agenda wasn’t about becoming famous.

    CS: Why do you think he took so many chances with unknowns? Looking back on it, the casting was brilliant.

    HOLLEND: I think everyone at some point is an unknown. If you keep going back to the well, these people become so known that it actually hurts them because they are not able to play a role. Without knowing these people, you love them as the characters they are playing. And I certainly think they took the time to cast and find the people that were going to play the parts well but you bought them as these characters. Some of this is our fault because they almost got pigeon holed.

    CS: What do you they think? What do they…..let me try to wrap my mouth around the question. When you got these actors to talk about it, a lot of the actors I talk to when they have features coming out in a week, two weeks, three weeks, all talk about that it was just a job, a good experience. But now these guys you talked to, they’ve had the benefit of pop culture catching up with them and seeing how much an impact they do, what do they feel? The ones that got out of acting all together, how do they view these films in regards to their own life paths ““ do they look at it as just a job or do they look at it as something more?

    HOLLEND: They look at it as something more. I think they were all: a) nostalgic and b) sad and almost set them up for disaster because they never got those experiences again. In each film you have an experience ““ a bonding experience. Each film is unique to its own. A lot of them were saying, “We’d love to work with him again. Come back.” One of Judd’s last sentences was, “Let’s do it again.” When someone says it’s just a job I find that interesting. Did you not read the script at all? What made you want to do it? And I think a lot of them found that in years to come, that was some of the best writing they ever got to speak.

    When you start off that good, it’s hard to find that again. I think they would love to get back to that place in the film world, where they can erase some of the past, and do some good work. Be really inspired by a script.

    I know Mia talks about she went to this art school from Ferris Bueller and John really recreated a high school environment so I think part of what was captured was him again, creating this real world that they were playing from. It wasn’t just a set. There was this real life high school happening while they were shooting it. It’s the chemistry. She was a 17 year old girl, so she was so awkward and uncomfortable it translates.

    FACCIOLO: Like Roger Ebert said, he put them up in a motel outside of O’Hare and got all the kids out of Hollywood ““ there was no flying them in and out of Hollywood and you’re on the set for three months, you’re secluded and you’re bonding with thee people as your friends, as your high school peers and you’re going to deal with it because that’s what you are dealing with in character so that’s what you are going to deal with in front of the camera.

    Mia has a quote that he would take Alan and Matthew down to the record store and buy thousands of records ““ just listen to all this different music. His wall, Ferris’s room is covered in posters with all the British rock bands they never knew of. He really went into the psyche and gave these guys all this extra material to work with.

    FACCIOLO: Like we had a little scene in our film where after the interviews we would ask them to give a message to John Hughes. And Mia said she was very sorry and was very apologetic for the way she behaved on that film. She was Sloan but as time went by I think she reflected on that and she’s obviously changed and you know, she was 17 or 18 years old when she did that film. But now she has the perspective to look back.

    Special thanks to Emma McIntyre for some photo assistance