FRED Entertainment

October 26, 2006

The Fred Hembeck Show: Episode 78 – Ghost to Ghost

Filed under: The Fred Hembeck Show — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:01 am

fredhembeckheader.jpg

Halloween is almost upon us again.

Me, I love All Hallows Eve. If there truly is one holiday that belongs to kids, this – even more so than Christmas – is it. But unlike waking up on December 25th, reasonably assured Santa stopped off the night before, delivering the requisite gifts, there’s always an unsettling uncertainty about October 31st’s grand finale.

hembeck2006-10-26-01.jpg

Stop and think about it – you can watch a scary movie anytime, buy yourself a bag of candy corn at your tummy’s convenience, throw a costume party whenever you choose, even carve a pumpkin when the mood hits you, but trick or treating? Uh uh – there’s a very small window of opportunity for THAT activity – roughly a couple of hours on the last night of each October – and when it’s over, baby, it’s OVER!

You were too sick to go out gathering candy with your friends? Sorry, pal – there’s no do-overs on November 1st. You’re just gonna have to wait – AN ENTIRE YEAR!!

A torrential downpour? Oh, well – just gotta hope for better weather next time around.

Yeah, Halloween can be cruel.

It rained the night of my daughter Julie’s initial trick or treating expedition. Happily, while it was a steady rain, it wasn’t enough to keep us off the streets – or enough to give us pneumonia either! She was only three at the time, and the truth is, I got just as big a kick – maybe more – of roaming the streets in search of sweets as Julie did. We were living in the smallish city of Kingston then, where there was a rather early curfew of 7 o’clock, and I can still vividly recall the last house we visited that night as we headed back home. It was maybe five minutes past seven, and as we climbed up onto one final porch, and rang one last doorbell, I saw the women come from down the hallway towards us. Initially, all she could see was my weatherbeaten countenance, and frankly, she looked pretty disgusted, but as soon as she got close enough to spy the adorable two foot ghost accompanying me, her expression changed entirely. It was a lesson that would serve us well in the selling of Girl Scout cookies – it’s hard to say no to “cute”.

Well, maybe that evening’s precipitation was our trial by fire (such as it was), and we passed, because ever since, we’ve been lucky enough to have had rain free Halloweens, several of which were downright balmy for upstate New York. When we moved here to our new home ten years back, we also moved into a curfew-free environment. Generally, the rule of thumb around these parts is that the costumed ghouls and ghosties take to the streets somewhere between 5 and 9, with most of the heavy activity falling between 6:30 and 8. Of course, that doesn’t preclude teen-agers banging on your door at 10:45 as they did the first year we were here. I answered the door, but expressed a bit of surprise that they’d even consider stopping by at that late an hour. The teens were quick to point out that we had left all our outdoor lights on, and to them, that was clearly a signal that we were still actively in the candy-doling business. Well, I gave then their Baby Ruth’s and sent them on their way, quickly turning off our lights, and have made a point of extinguishing our outer illumination shortly after nine each year since, meaning we’ve had no further late-night visits.

hembeck2006-10-26-02.jpg

Which is not to say that we haven’t been on the OTHER side of the coin ourselves. For a number of years, we’d go out with the next door neighbors, a pair of sisters and their mom. We’d head out as close to six as possible, and then just keep going, making big looping circles around the area, stopping in at home mid-way through to drop off our booty and maybe down a refreshing drink. Year in and year out, the kids next door would inevitably poop out about a half an hour before us, calling it a night while Julie and I trudged on, covering several now ever more deserted streets. One was a dead end where the folks way at the furthest end always put way too much effort into making their home Halloween friendly, as not nearly enough trick or treaters ever made it down there to fully appreciate all the cobwebs, skeletons, and carved pumpkins gaudily on display.

But we always made it, always alone, always near the end of our journey. HOW near the end? Well, I’ll never forget the one time, after our annual visit to the aforementioned Spooktacular, we headed on over to the house next door. Since the outdoor lights were still on – meaning it was fair game (no lights mean stay away, sorry, not home, or, done for the night) – we went up and rang the door bell. We waited patiently for a few seconds, and then through the large picture window in front, I saw a man, toothbrush still in mouth, dressed in pajamas, grab his robe, and head towards the door. By the time he’d opened the door, he had managed to put aside the toothbrush and bruskly gave Julie her treat.

Oops. You never want to be answering the door on Halloween in your jammies…

hembeck2006-10-26-03.jpg

I accompanied my daughter on her annual moonlight treks from ages three right on up to eleven, but was then politely informed that y’know, maybe she was getting a wee bit too old to be trick or treating with her daddy. I had to agree, however reluctantly. The following year was pretty rough – I had street walking withdrawal (if you know what I mean), but at least these days I get to stay at home and hand out goodies to the costumed cut-ups who knock on our door. It’s not quite the same as the magic of being out in the thick of things, but I guess it’s gonna have to do me. No doubt about it, I really treasure the time I put in on past Halloween expeditions. More than once, I’d stop Julie and tell her to take a look around and consider what was going on: right then and there, in every town, on every street, and at every house, kids dressed up in funny outfits were going door to door to stranger’s houses, requesting candy, and – oboy! – getting it!! Wow! What a wonderfully crazy idea this was!

hembeck2006-10-26-04.jpg

But it only lasts for a few ephemeral hours on one specific night each year, and if you missed it, you missed it. And even while we were amassing our booty – and it was more the thrill of the hunt than it was the bagging of the game, trust me – I could always sense the minutes ticking inexorably away, the magic of the night slowly evaporating, until the raucous crowds of kids criss-crossing each other on our suburban streets was reduced to merely occasional far-away echoes of stragglers as Julie and I headed home, rarely seeing anyone else still making out the rounds. All too soon, it was over, and everything was back to normal. Dull, unmagical normal….

Some folks don’t dig the trick or treating, and I respect that. Look, I was lucky enough to grow up in a Halloween friendly area, and the same can be said for now 16 year old Julie. But I suppose there are places where going out in the dark of night, angling for sweets, well, that may NOT be the best of ideas. That’s a dirty shame, because trick or treating really is a uniquely special custom, one I’m happy to take part of in any way possible!

One other personal tradition I’ve maintained growing up was rereading my various Little Lulu Halloween giants at the end of each October, especially in those years after I myself was deemed a bit too old to go trick or treating. This was a way for me to properly capture the spirit of the season, as these were the only comics I’ve ever encountered that acknowledged there was far more to Halloween than just telling hackneyed old ghost stories and the like. I’ve shared some random images from those late fifties, early sixties classic issues here to accompany my ruminations, and I hope I didn’t trick you into thinking this week’s episode was actually going to be about comics! Now, THAT would’ve been a treat! Maybe next time…

Happy Halloween, friends!

Hembeck.com – live from ghost to ghost all year round!

-Copyright 2006 Fred Hembeck

October 25, 2006

Scrubs Blog: Judy’s Shout Out

Filed under: Production Blogs,Scrubs Blog — UncaScroogeMcD @ 7:13 pm
scrubsheader.jpg

VIDEO BLOG #63: “Judy’s Shout Out” ““
Still on the mend but healing fast, Judy Reyes drops a quick thanks to all you wonderful fans and well-wishers…

scrubs2006-10-25.jpg

Download Scrubs Video Blog #63:

  • Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 7.72 MB)
  • Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 3.33 MB)

##

Brat-halla #151: Norse Force – Spin the Battle

Filed under: Brat-Halla,Comic Strips — UncaScroogeMcD @ 6:00 am

by Jeffery Stevenson and Seth Damoose with colors by Anthony Lee

NEWS: Well, all good things come to an end”¦ but not this comic. Seth and I (after a lot of thought and debating) have decided to move Brat-halla over to a new website. We’ll keep posting here for the next 2-3 weeks to let the casual readers get the news, but we’ll now be a part of Graphic Smash. We’ve enjoyed our time here, but we really wanted to make the comic (and its archives) easier to read for new readers and our long-time readers. Spook’d will keep chugging along here at Quick Stop.

Larger Comic Version | ARCHIVES | OLDER ARCHIVES

Brat-halla #151: Norse Force - Spin the Battle

For extras, visit the Brat-halla Web site!

Check out the preview to the Image comic Jeff writes…

E-MAIL WRITER | ABOUT JEFF | ABOUT SETH | BRAT-HALLA BLOG | BRAT-HALLA FORUM | ARCHIVES

Quick Stop Thingamabobs: 10/25/2006

Filed under: Columns,Thingamabobs — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:00 am
thingamabobs.jpg

The web. It’s a big place, full of plenty of distractions ““ some funny, some informative, some ludicrous, some disturbing, some inane, some profound. Each and every weekday, we present links to a few of our favorite finds”¦

————————————————

  • The absolute worst Oscar opening number, ever. (Thingamabob)
  • Conan O’Brien and “The Monster Mash.” Dance, you red-headed monstrosity, dance! (Thingamabob)
  • Continuing our celebration of the release of the (hopefully) first volume of Sesame Street: Old School on DVD, here’s another classic bit. (Thingamabob)
  • And finally, High Poobah Kevin Smith on Sucks Less… (Thingamabob)

Have a THINGAMABOB? Send it in!

##

October 24, 2006

Keneteph’s Korner: Film Review – Before The Music Dies

Filed under: Columns,Keneteph's Korner — UncaScroogeMcD @ 9:15 pm
keneteph.gif
Before the Music Dies: Putting the “Muse” Back in Music

As an independent musician, I have been hit with the harsh reality that things in the recording industry have not changed for the betterment of the artist.  Record companies are interested in the bottom line of making money, and not putting out music that positively influences, or grows on the listener.  The opportunities to openly express oneself and be heard that my influences had, are not exactly there for up and coming artists like myself.

When I first heard about director Andrew Shapter, and co-writer Joel Rasmussen’s film Before the Music Dies, a sense of inspiration hit me.  Once I finished watching the film, the feeling only grew, opening my mind to the fact that many music fans, and artists alike want to do something to change music for the better.  The film features artists Erykah Badu, Dave Matthews Band, Bonnie Rait, and Questlove from The Roots, and others all talking about their dissatisfaction on the way things have gone in the music industry.

keneteph2006-10-24 01.jpg
Joel Rasmussen & Andrew Shapter

Both Shapter and Rasmussen talked with me more in depth about their influences and purpose behind the film.  Shapter originally came up with the idea to make this documentary through his experience as a fashion photographer.  “I would take pictures for CD covers, and MTV, and noticed a shift in my job where an emphasis was placed on making the artist look younger as opposed to their music,” he explained.  Questions he posed about this and other issues in the music industry were subsequently answered in the film.  He pitched the idea for the film to Rasmussen, who is also a musician, and was keneteph2006-10-24 05.jpgtired of hearing the same songs on the radio.  “Both of us are parents and it concerned us that most songs don’t talk about things anymore,” Rasmussen said.  Reflecting on the music of yesteryear, they were frustrated that the lyrics in music have become so watered down.  “There was a time when an artist’s songs talked about things that were going on in the world and inspired its listeners,” Shapter added, “now the industry is not investing in prolific writers,.”  In search of the reason behind authentic music’s apparent demise, they allowed their quest to be the fuel behind creating an insightful documentary to pass on to their children, and other future generations to come.

Addressing this serious topic in an entertaining, yet informative way, Shapter, and Rasmussen educate the viewer on the ins and outs of a business many are so infatuated with.  In comparing music of today with songs of the past there is a humorous scene when radio personality/comedian Charlie Hodge interviewed what looked like  teenage girls after an Ashlee Simpson concert.  He asked them if her songs inspired them to do anything and in a giggly tone they responded “no!”  Despite there being a lack of musical inspiration for today’s youth, Before the Music Dies offers a silver lining to the nasty storm the current music industry has created.  Shapter says the goal of this movie is three fold; to first wake up the audience and go below the surface of the music industry.  The other is to inspire musicians and show them that in lieu of their frustration there is hope.  Lastly, they want communities to support independent musicians by going to their shows.

keneteph2006-10-24 04.jpg

Before the Music Dies is distributed by B-Side Entertainment which is putting the film on a national screening tour.  The tour will focus on communities where die hard music fans reside.  Steve Waters, a representative from B-Side stated the film will reach audiences that otherwise wouldn’t be reached.  “There will be a music screening for inner city youth in Rhode Island, and also one in Morehouse College,” he stated.  They are also looking for organizations across the nation who would be interested in hosting a screening of the film.  For more information on the film, or if interested in hosting a screening go to www.beforethemusicdies.com, or www.myspace.com/beforethemusicdies.

View Trailer

–Copyright 2006 Keneteph Entertainment

Toy Box: Three Faces of Elvis

Filed under: Columns,Toy Box — admin @ 8:36 pm
toybox.jpg

Are you in the market for a hunka hunka burnin’ love? Then I have good news, and bad news. The bad news is that I’m not available. The good news is that the next best thing in the form of not one, not two, but THREE Elvis figures from Mcfarlane are.

Mcfarlane has had the Elvis license for awhile now, and started with the figure that’s still my favorite, the 68 Comeback Tour version. Since then, they’ve produced 5 more versions: Rockabilly, Las Vegas, New York City, Jailhouse Rock and Blue Hawaii. This new boxed set is a re-release of versions 4, 5 and 6, all in one handy package, and is exclusive to Spencer’s stores.

If you have any questions or comments, feel free to drop me a line at mwc@mwctoys.com or hit my other website at http://www.mwctoys.com. On to the review!

“Elvis – 1956. 1957 and 1961”

toybox_102406_1a.jpg

The box lists these by the year of his appearance, but the first is the New York City appearance version, the second is his look in the film Jailhouse Rock, and the third is his appearance in the film Blue Hawaii. For a guy that wasn’t much of an actor, he sure did star in an awful lot of films.

toybox_102406_1c.jpg
toybox_102406_1b.jpg

Packaging – ***
Boxes are always nice, because they store easily for MIBBers, and can be used to display the toys a little better than cardbacks. It’s not a collector friendly box, unless you’re really masochistic, because there’s a ton of twisties and tape. However, it does show off the figures well, and does a nice job looking good on the shelf.

toybox_102406_2.jpg

Sculpting – Jailhouse ****; NYC ***1/2; Blue Hawaii **1/2
There are major differences between these three head sculpts, although the period of time they cover is fairly short in Elvis’ career.

toybox_102406_3b.jpg

Of the three, Jailhouse Rock is easily my favorite. They’ve captured his face and expression so well it’s scary, and the detail work on areas like his teeth and tongue is outstanding. Going with closed eyes is always a risky venture, since so much of a person’s personality comes from their eyes, but they pulled it off beautifully here. The sculpted pose is also perfect, going with a trademark dance move from the film that’s both dynamic and cool.

toybox_102406_3a.jpg

Next on the list is the 1956 gold lame outfit version. Here, the head sculpt is extremely good, but not quite as perfect. It’s definitely Elvis, right down to the pouty lips, but he’s a little less expressive this time. The detail work on his costume is fantastic, espeically the ruffles and contours of the shirt and suit. Again, the pose selected is a classic, and fits the character perfectly. This is critical of course, since these figures have very little articulation. The pose they sculpt you is the pose you get.

toybox_102406_3c.jpg

Finally, there’s Blue Hawaii. Now, it’s a little tough to separate the issues with the sculpt from the issues with the paint. This is one of those cases where the sculpt may be getting unfairly abused by a less than stellar paint job, and it’s always hard to tell. But of the three, this face is the farthest from the Elvis likeness. The lips are much thinner than the other two, and the nose is longer and narrower. The body sculpt is still the usual excellent McToys work, and the pose is another nice dynamic choice, expressing the energy and flamboyance of the singer. But without the outfit and base, some folks might have a tough time picking this out as Elvis.

Paint – Jailhouse, NYC ***1/2; Blue Hawaii **1/2
On some of these figures, great piant improves great sculpts. On others, eh, not so much.

toybox_102406_4a.jpg

Again Jailhouse Rock is my favorite. The bold black and white color scheme looks great on the shelf, and they’ve done a good job with the thin lines and dotted seams of the black denim. I do wish that the white lines of the shirt wrapped all the way around (although I can’t be positive that they should), and there are a few stray marks here and there. But the face paint is excellent on this version, and the details generally clean and sharp.

toybox_102406_5a.jpg

Next favorite again is the 1956 New York City appearance version. Are we noticing a trend here? This is a very colorful version of Elvis, with lots of gold and silver. These are traditionally tough colors to do with a consistent application, with no thin spots or other colors showing through. They do a pretty good job, although it’s not quite perfect. The gold is a little inconsistent in thickness and coverage in some spots, but it’s not enough to hurt the figure in a major way.

Again, his face paint is excellent, especially the subtle difference in color between the lips and skin on his face. There’s a little bit of clumpiness to the skin tone, but again, it’s quite minor.

toybox_102406_5b.jpg

Finally, there’s Blue Hawaii. Here, the face paint is the big let down. The eyebrows don’t follow the sculpted lines well at all, and instead are pointed downward at an odd angle. The skin tone itself has more issues with clumpiness on the face, neck and arms, and isn’t as clean and consistent as the other two.

The costume itself is fairly good, although I was left with a pretty obvious mark on the white pants from the ukelele. I suspect a better paint job woud have done wonders for this particular likeness of Elvis, but that’s lost with this application.

Articulation – Jailhouse, Blue Hawaii **; NYC *1/2
If you’re thinking uber-articulation, you aren’t thinking about this line up. These are supposed to be little statues, cheaper than the high end resin stuff, but with a similar level of quality. What they aren’t is *action* figures. If you understand and have no issue with this going in, then this category won’t mean much to you.

Each figure has very basic articulation – cut neck, cut shoulders, cut waist. A couple also sport cut wrists, to assist in getting just the right hand pose to hold an accessory. But the articulation that’s here is designed to do one thing and one thing only – get the figure in a single, good looking dynamic pose and stay there.

The gold lame version gets a lower score than the other two not because of less articulation, but because mine has a huge gap at the left shoulder that I couldn’t correct. This kind of quality issue really detracts from the overall appearance of the figure.

Accessories – ***
Each figure comes with a base, and perhaps one or two more goodies depending on the version.

toybox_102406_4c.jpg

The NYC Appearance version has the best looking base of the three, with a great backdrop of the poster art for the appearance suspended between two columns, and a base designed like a stage. He also comes with the microphone and stand, which is a separate piece and can be held in his right hand.

toybox_102406_4b.jpg

Blue Hawaii has a base with the Elvis name cut into the front, and a nifty sandy beach top. Behind him is a cardboard backer with the Blue Hawaii logo, but this backer is a tad on the small side, not even reaching the top of his head. There are two small pegs that are used to attach the backer to the base, and you’ll find these on the underside. There’s also a separate surf board with fits into two sculpted notches in the base. There’s a lai of flowers for around his neck, and there’s the ukelele which is removable if you want to try hard enough, but I wouldn’t recommend it.

toybox_102406_5c.jpg

Jailhouse Rock has a base shaped like an album, with two sections of jail cell and a name plate that attach to the side. Again, there’s a small pin in a bag on the underside of the base that you can use to affix the top of the name plate to the top of the one section of cell.

Fun Factor – *1/2
If you’re looking for an Elvis figure for your son to use in his karate tourniments with G.I. Joe, this ain’t him. Figures like this are the Hummels of our age.

Value – ***
At around $12 – $13, these are a solid value on the current market. The cool bases add to the value of course, and even having a couple accessories is a big plus.

Things to Watch Out For:
Not a thing, really. If you pick them out in person, you might want to watch for bad paint, particularly on Blue Hawaii, and any joint gapping like I had with NYC, but things should be pretty consistent otherwise.

Overall – Jailhouse, NYC ***1/2; Blue Hawaii **1/2
The quality varies between the three figures, and there’s no doubt that the Jailhouse and New York City versions have better sculpts and paint. Still, for the big fan of the King, these are a great addition to the collection. Where else can you get six different versions of Elvis, all in the same scale and style, except from Mcfarlane? And grabbing this exclusive three pack means you save a few bucks as well.

Where to Buy:
This three pack is an exclusive to Spencers, but you can snag some of the singles online:

– CornerStoreComics has the singles of Jailhouse and Blue Hawaii for around $13 each, but don’t have the boxed set listed.

– Amazing Toyz is likewise only selling singles, including Jailhouse, at around $13 each.

– Clark Toys has him at $15, but the other two are sold out.

Related Links:
I previously reviewed the Jailhouse Rock figure, as well as the 68 Comeback Special version.

Trailer Park: Can You Handle A Lot Of Dick?

Filed under: Columns,Interviews,Trailer Park — admin @ 8:38 am

By Christopher Stipp

Archives? Right Here…And Over Here

He was right.

You do have expectations when someone tells you that you’re about to have one on one time with Andy Dick. Impropriety, boorishness and obnoxiousness are all things that spring eternal when you only have public perception to go off of.

True, if you’re doing your due diligence you can see that not all of Andy’s past can be written off to superfluous exaggerations that can be easily erased. He’s deserved a lot of it.

However, the roast for William Shatner has been a watershed in Andy’s recent past with regard to what the power of the written word can do to a person. A writer for the New York Post’s notorious Page Six gossip column detailed an out-of-control Andy that “groped” “tried to kiss” and “proclaimed his love for her” before finally “urinating in front of the horrified journalist.” It’s hard to defend one’s self against something like this but even though Andy goes on to explain what happened below, his language befitting his defense; it really is Andy’s suggestion to investigate the writer’s personal blog that opened my eyes to something genuinely pathetic.

The woman who supposed herself to be horrified by this whole situation has turned her audio of the situation into comedy and even employs her friends to “act out” the transcript in what I can only assume is supposed to be something amusing, funny even.

It isn’t.

It’s embarrassing. The woman makes a mocks of her own stupidity in thinking it would be hilarious to get all her cronies on a stage and make something out of a drunken moment that, even if true, is more sad and personal than anything else. This isn’t so much about exploiting this moment for whatever it’s worth but it’s a glaring reflection of this woman as a professional. Jayson Blair she’s not but it’s a shame to know that a woman who has such an impressive resume of popular periodicals she’s written for treats the profession of a writer, the very thing she touts as being so important to her, with as much regard as a vampire would give to a fattened sow.

Now, while the above incident stokes some of Andy’s emotional embers, we had to break this interview up over two days only because we had to stop after he vented regarding what happened that night, Andy was perhaps one of the most engaging interview subjects I’ve had the pleasure to talk to this year. His blend of honesty and irreverence makes him vulnerable, to be sure, but it’s a rarity.

You’ve got to give it up for a guy who helped push Ben Stiller into the pop cultural zeitgeist, who assisted a Kid in The Hall to make one of the better sitcoms ever produced by NBC and made an honest living over on ABC for so many years. It’s hard not to give thanks for a guy who works so well within the fabric of comedy and still finds the strength to fight the market forces that would rather see an obnoxious version of a persona he is trying to shed. True, public incidents have threatened to chip away at what he’s built over these years but it’s his tenaciousness that’s going to keep him around for a long time.

Watch for Andy Dick’s directorial debut this winter when DANNY ROANE: FIRST TIME DIRECTOR comes to theaters and as it lands on DVD. I caught up with Andy just as he was talking to someone other than me.

ACT I

CHRISTOPHER STIPP: What are you working on?

ANDY DICK: We’re writing a pilot and [the people I’m working with] have a lot of questions.

CS: What’s the pilot for if I could ask?

DICK: Comedy Central. I’m writing it longhand and they have to translate my hieroglyphics to the computer.

CS: Is it really that bad?

DICK: Yeah, because I think faster than I write.

CS: I know when you talked with Howard Stern last week regarding how well you’re doing since rehab are you finding your thoughts are coming to you quicker, cleaner?

DICK: Yup, oh yeah. Hell yes.

I bounce back surprisingly fast but it’s not like I’m shoting up heroin in a drug den or passed out on a big, black whore in a downtown LA crack house. Hey, I’m not sayin’ I’m too good for that. I’ve just never been invited to a good crack house.

CS: And this brings up a great point: is it odd to have so many people, the public, know so much about your personal life?

DICK: Yeah, that was probably a bad move on my part.

I know a lot of people in the industry with bigger demons than me, but you would never know it because they do a good job of keeping it under wraps. They do and their team does. My team, Team Dick, threw in the towel years ago, and it wasn’t really a towel to begin with. It was more of a cum rag.

Hollywood is riddled with addicts of all colors: drug addicts, sex addicts, gambling addicts, perverts, freaks and weirdoes. And I’m still talking about Team Dick, which of course I’m not only the president but I’m also a member. You know I’m just kidding, except for the cum rag part.

CS: And it seems like when you were talking with Howard last week that the relationship you’re forging with your son is helping you a great deal.

DICK: He’s a shining light in my life. He’s really a good kid.

CS: And was he there during the infamous Shatner roast?

DICK: He was in the audience.

CS: And for those not in the know about what was alleged in Page Six about what happened following the roast how did the events get so blown out of proportion?

DICK: Well, what do you think happened?

CS: From what I read it said you had openly urinated on the floor.

DICK: No, no, no. That’s such a lie. That girl came into my dressing room uninvited.

She’s a non-working stand-up comic; an unfunny, self-proclaimed, stand-up comic looking like a ravenous wolverine hunting for material.

She saw an easy target, his name was Andy Dick, and she forced her way into my dressing room past my friends. She’s cute so she was able to charm her way in, sit in the main chair in the room and hold court with the rest of my friends where she wowed everyone with her fake cuteness, her saccharine sweet smile, and the cunty way about her.

She then, after partying with us, drinking, having fun, doing whatever with my friends, and then announced that she is doing an article”¦she’s a Page Six reporter. And then, when I heard that, I said, “Oh, you gotta help me out over there. They’re so mean. They’re constantly raking me over the coals. You can see we’re just having fun, we all are, we’re laughing, we’re having fun.” She’s laughing, she’s having fun, she’s flirting with my guy friends, she’s pretty much slutting her way around my dressing room, like I said, holding court with all my guy friends.

I’m trying to explain to her, “You’ve got to help me. You can see I’m not doing drugs, we’re all drinking. You’ve got to write something. You can see I’m a nice guy.” I was really trying to toot my own horn and prove that I was nice. I went into the bathroom, which is over towards the door and around the corner, the toilet’s way around the corner, you can’t even see the door from where she was sitting, let alone the toilet. I left the door open and as I’m peeing I say out loud, “I’m leaving the door open so that you know I’m not doing drugs in here. That’s how important this is that you write something nice about me.”

So, even my best efforts to show, to appear that I’m doing well, which I wasn’t at my best, I was drinking, and by that point I was probably even half-crocked, she turned that into that I peed on her, you say I peed on the floor, I didn’t pee on the floor, I peed in the toilet, with the door open, where no one could see so that she could tell that I wasn’t doing any kind of drugs because I wasn’t.

If I ever see her now that I haven’t been drinking and I have my wits more about me, if I ever run into her again I would kick her in the cunt if I didn’t think it would ruin my shine. And that’s a quote from Michael O’Donoghue from Saturday Night Live when he was upset about being cut out of a cast and crew picture.

You can see I’m a little angry.

CS: And rightfully so.

DICK: Thank you, I agree.

One girl, single-handedly, one comic, non-working, un-funny, because I’ve listened to some of her stuff on MySpace, one comic almost single-handedly took me out at the knees and it did major major damage.

Now, I didn’t need any help to figure out I needed to sober up. I was taking a break, I had just finished months before the roast, Less Than Perfect got cancelled, and I was taking what I call a mini-vacation. I was drinking, taking a vacation, and I knew I was going to sober up before I started working on the Comedy Central pilot. I didn’t need any help from this girl. I can take myself down to my own bottom.

CS: Well, why do people like her exist to perpetuate disinformation?

DICK: Everyone loves to read about someone else who’s doing horribly. It makes them feel better. Even I do. It’s very hard for me but I do not read the tabloids. They’re right in front of my face when I’m buying something at Whole Foods, and I just do not pick them up. I want to, I want to see that weird picture of Nicole Ritchie running on the beach and she’s got folds of skin”¦it’s right there on the cover, you can’t get away from it. It’s so unfair but I’ve seen other pictures where she doesn’t have the cellulite. Which one is the untouched picture?

It’s so creepy but people love to read and hear about other people doing horribly. But in this particular case this woman, because I have people that report back to me from New York City, who have seen her live on stage at an open mic type of situation where she’s not getting paid, talks about me and, pretty much, takes her little story, expands upon it, and turns it into a little one woman show.

She’s just a fuckin’ bitch is what she is. She’s just a true, downright fucking needy desperate little whore bitch. And you can print that.

She’s a horrible person and those people are out there. She SOLD her shit, probably for 50 bucks, to Howard. And that’s why I was so mad at Howard that he would take that and he would do that. He would play it on the air and it’s like I wish I had a mini tape recorder so I could record, just a little bit, of Howard and his girlfriend having sex. I bet that would be really funny. But, I wouldn’t do that.

I would love to be able and record one one conversation that witch has had with her ex-boyfriend or her mother or herself when she’s talking into the mirror: “Who’s the cuntiest of them all?” We could play that on the radio for everyone to hear. It’s like, leave me alone. I don’t go after you and your pathetic life don’t go after me and my pathetic life. I can get to a place where things are pretty pathetic, I don’t need any help getting there”¦having it being spread all over the airwaves like bad Smuckers jam on moldy Wonder Bread. I ain’t milquetoast or middle of the road white bread, baby.

CS: Any way for retribution or a retraction”¦

DICK: There’s too much stuff out there”¦It’s impossible because it starts with the seed of truth. What am I going to do, hire lawyers to sue her? There’s just no point. That just keeps it alive, and then suddenly she has a career based on me trying to sue her. It’s a vicious circle. It just gives it more and more power. I’ve already given her too much power in this interview. I’m done. She’s dead to me. That’s the last you’ll hear about her except when I go to jail for kicking her in her dried-up, barren, rancid, smelly cunt.

[Andy laughs]

ACT II

DICK: Let’s do this”¦

CS: Let’s talk DANNY ROANE: FIRST TIME DIRECTOR.

DICK: What do you want to know?

CS: Well, it looks like your first foray into making your own film.

DICK: Yup, I wrote it, I raised my own money by going to the bank and taking it out my account, produced it, directed it, cast it, used all my friends in it and sold it to Lions Gate.

CS: Were you the one involved in pitching the movie to Lions Gate?

DICK: No pitch. I made the movie; shot it, directed it, edited it, had it all done and I just had to show them the final product. There was no studio involved. The movie was done and I showed it to a bunch of people. And then Think Films”¦You’ve heard of Think Films?

CS: Yes.

DICK: Think Films, they did THE ARISTOCRATS, they wanted to buy it, Lions Gate wanted to buy it, and a few other companies wanted to buy it, and I chose Lions Gate just because I just”¦they offered more money and I was in a movie, EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH, I was in that and it’s a Lions Gate movie and so I just wanted to stay in bed with them, so to speak. I’m about to go pitch them a movie now, the normal way. Where you pitch it and then write it and develop it and I’m doing that next week.

CS: Were you at any kind of disadvantage when you made DANNY ROANE with regard to having to coordinate the schedules of the people I see that are in it, Jack Black, Ben Stiller, Maura Tierney, etc”¦

DICK: There were a lot of roadblocks and obstacles but I got through all of them. There are just tons and tons. There were so many that a normal person would just quit and stop but I had a great producer, Marshall Cook, who, every time I wanted to quit, would say, “Let’s just keep going.” We pushed through and pushed through.

We only shot for 12 days.

CS: Really?

DICK: Yeah, we had some pick-up shots throughout the year and then we edited, we edited for a good 8 months, on and off, because I used 5 different editors, at different times, then the Avids were set up in my house and we really just did it on a shoestring budget and by the skin of our teeth.

CS: A lot of people have to go back and do re-shoots”¦Anything you thought you captured the first time and then it just didn’t happen to capture the way you wanted?

DICK: No, I have a lot of disappointments, but that’s how it is with any artist: “It could’ve been better.”

Could’ve been better but everything I’ve done in my life could have been done better. But, it’s a great great great movie and”¦could’ve done better.

CS: So you still want to make a second feature?

DICK: Oh yeah, this next one I am pitching”¦I’m going to write it, direct it and star in it as well. I want do one a year like Woody Allen. I love it. I love the process. It’s just like a painting; you constantly want to paint over it and repaint it and make it better. It’s like when I first learned how to do oil painting and I painted a picture and it was so beautiful but I kept tweaking it to the point where it was an ugly mass of globby crap. You can’t do that. It’s too easy to overwork something.

CS: That’s a great thing you’ve said because some of the greatest authors of literature, when they were still alive and had a chance to edit subsequent editions of their work, tweaked and revising. Is there a point where you can’t stop yourself or do you have to say, “This is as good as it’s going to be”?

DICK: I guess”¦that’s the most important part of director’s vision: just to know when to stop. Just to know when to say, “This movie is done. It’s as good as it can get,”

For what I shot, and the amount of money I had, DANNY ROANE is as good as it can be or I wouldn’t have stopped. I edited my little heart out till I said this movie isn’t going to get any better for what it is and for what I have shot. I can keep going back to add a little more, edit a little more but I can’t because I don’t have the money. You just have to stop. And that’s when the director becomes the artist. He has to make that creative decision. “Ok, now we’re done folks.”

And I’m not even really done because I have to take out a lot of the music that’s in it because I only paid for festival rights and now that it’s going to be a real movie”¦it’s going to be another $100,000, I found out, to buy the songs so I have to have friends write songs, I have to write songs, I need to find cool indie bands that don’t have publishing deals yet because I don’t have $100,000 in my pocket to pay for all the great songs I picked out. Everything from Ween, Tom Waits to Nick Drake. I just don’t have the money.

CS: Does that change the vibe of the film? When you’ve obviously scored it in your head”¦

DICK: Of course”¦My goal is to make it even better, of course. I’m not going to cheapen it. I’m going to find songs that, in my head, make it better, obviously. I’m not setting out to make it crappier.

I’m going to take my time”¦really sift through lots of music that people are giving me. I’m going to find the right songs. I’m going to have a kick-ass soundtrack and it’s going to be better than the original one because the original music was a lot of afterthought, “Oh, by the way, we need music.” And I quickly gathered all my favorite songs, not worrying right then and there how much it was going to cost me.

Now, it’s time to worry about that.

CS: And when is DANNY ROANE going to come out?

Hopefully, sometime next year. Beginning of next year. January, February, something like that, on DVD. We might have a small theatrical opening, New York, LA.

CS: Excellent. And now, I hate to switch gears so fast, but because I know you don’t have that long I’d like to know more about The Shit Show you did on Sirius.

DICK: Oh good. Now THAT’S something we can talk about at length because that’s happening right now.

I’m actually in negotiations with both Sirius and XM so it’s kind of like DANNY ROANE where I was talking to Think Films and talking to Lions Gate.

I have a relationship with Howard Stern and he”¦we already did a pilot episode [on Sirius] that was an hour long, and that was two Tuesdays ago, at 10 o’clock at night or something like that. And it went really well and they were trying to make a deal with me but the money is so low, it’s laughable.

And I called XM and said, because I had been doing some interviews on their stations, “Would you guys like me to a do a show for you?” Because I had so much fun doing the show [on Sirius], it was so easy, and they kind of sweetened the pot a bit”¦they said, “Well, we’ll set up a studio in your house.” And I’m like if I have a studio in my house I wouldn’t mind doing a daily show which means, of course, more money, more fun and it could just be every night at like 10 o’clock from 10 to midnight. I think it should be from 11 to 1 because a lot of people go to bed between the hours of 11 to 1 so they could listen to it as they go to bed so I’m the last thing that they hear and they can dream about me all night.

[I laugh]

CS: And what kind of content?

DICK: It’s hardcore.

I use it as a platform. It’s almost like therapy for me. I just basically”¦it’s a music show, one musical guest, and a big one, like we have the Flaming Lips lined up, the lead singer from the Flaming Lips, we’ve got Isaac from Modest Mouse, we’ve got people all lined up to do the show, Alanis Morissette, Dave Grohl, these are all the people that we’re going after, who are also my friends. Jack Black from Tenacious D, Jack and Kyle, both of them, and all of them always have an album to promote.

It’s hardcore but it’s fun. We’re going to say the word “shit” we’re going to say the word “fuck,” because that’s the way I talk. The show has three segments: sex, drugs and rock n’ roll. And I basically talk with this person, it’s kind of like absolving your sins, we’ll top each other’s stories. “Oh, you did that? Here’s what I did this one time”¦” And we just talk about things we’ve done in the past and either how we either regret them or how we’re apologetic about it”¦it’s an amends like in the 12-step program. There’s a step in there called making amends where you talk about things you’ve done in the past. You go to that person and if there’s an apology owed you make that apology.

I have people call in and one segment is “Andy Dick Owes You A Formal Apology” and there’s plenty of people who call in who say “You know what you did to my girlfriend” or “You know what happened one night ten years ago” and I either corroborate the story and give them a formal apology that is pre-taped, I just insert their name, so that’s kind of a joke, but it’s good to just clear, on a very mundane, base, level”¦it clears my past. I don’t see the person eye-to-eye but I feel good about it. When I did the show I just felt real good. I must have had 10 callers call in on that segment alone.

For the most part the time runs out really fast, I never want it to end, and the whole time the musician is acoustically playing background music and by the end we talk about what’s coming up for them and then they play one or two songs from their album. They can play covers. It’s really an awesome show.

CS: It seems, if I can say it, like a real un-Andy Dick from what people would probably expect”¦

DICK: Yeah, it’s EXACTLY what they don’t expect but it’s exactly who I am and who I’ve been for years. It’s just showing another facet of this sweet, precious diamond called Dick.

[I laugh again]

It’s just another facet. It’s just an untapped market that no one knows because I’ve always hung out with musicians. Most of my friends are musicians. I don’t have many actor friends. Most of my friends are musicians and writers and then a few directors but I don’t really have a lot of actor friends, I have a handful. I might have some shows where I bring on actor friends. I was just hanging out with Natasha Lyonne and I said, “You should be on the show.” Even though it’s a music show I might bring her on because she knows bands, that’s what I could do, because actors always like to hang out with musicians and vise-versa.

CS: It seems lo-key”¦

DICK: It’s totally lo-key and not publicized. No one really knows about it. You ask me when and where I don’t even know. The times change. I don’t even know what fuckin’ satellite station it’s going to be on but I really enjoy myself. Since I’ve done hundreds and thousands of talk shows in my 20 years in doing this business professionally, I’ve done so many, that it comes naturally to me. It’s just talking on the radio and it feels so freeing kind of like taking all of your clothes off and running down the beach; to be able and go on the airwaves and just not have a clamp on my tongue. I don’t have to cater to anybody. I can say and be whatever I want. I can talk about ANYTHING and that feels REALLY good because I am so trained like a little flea in a flea circus who is underneath a glass dome. I can only jump up so high. And then you remove that glass and I am just starting to get my sea legs in this format.

I found myself tentative to use the “f” word but that only lasts 5 or 10 minutes and then I was on a roll, I was just going nuts. Then it was hard for me to go back, I was doing interviews, normal interviews, I was on Loveline shortly after that and they not only had to bleep me because I used the “f” word accidentally, but they cut my mic off for like 3, 4 or 5 minutes as a punishment. And I’m like, “You’re not punishing me. I don’t care if you cut my mic off, you’re punishing the listening audience because they can’t hear me now.” So, yeah, they cut my mic off and so Dr. Drew and Stryker were talking while I was in the corner with the dunce cap on my head”¦because I said the “f” word.

So, it’s hard to go back and forth a little bit but it’s just a skill I’m going to have to hone.

CS: And people expect a certain kind of “Dickness,” if I may say so, and”¦

DICK: Yeah! They expect a certain vulgarity, a certain clowny goofiness but, to be honest with you, my roots are in grounded subtlety. My comedy roots really, believe it or not, are in grounded, subtle, almost sweet, and precious, comedy moments that are very real. Like Bob Newhart, Shelley Berman, Mike Nichols and Elaine May. I was trained at Second City and ImprovOlympic where the motto is, “Truth in Comedy.” The comedy there was very grounded in reality.

I was just recording an episode of the Simpsons yesterday, playing myself. They said to me”¦I just have one line”¦and I just basically am Andy Dick trying to fit into the Blue Collar Comedy Tour and my line is, “Oh, I’m blue collar, I’m totally blue collar, my dad owns a shovel.” And I did it just like that. Really quiet. And they went, “Um, ok. Bigger! You can’t be too big in a cartoon.” And I’m like, “Ok. I’m blue collar. I’m TOTALLY blue collar, my dad owns a SHOVEL!”

They’re like, “Really Andy Dick it up! Andy Dick it up! Bigger!”

“I’M BLUE COLLAR. I’M TOTALLY BLUE COLLAR, MY DAD OWNS A SHOVEL!”

And they’re like, “We love it.” What happens is the media, the people, the producers, the directors, the industry, the town, the audience, pushes you, pushes you, pushes you to be bigger, bigger, bigger. It’s up to the actor or the artist to say, “You know what? This is all you’re getting. Because this is how I want to be. This is how I want the character to be. This is all you’re getting.”

And that’s why, a lot of the times, the big actors are so great”¦they’re so subtle. But sometimes it’s just because being big or being excitable is not in their repertoire. They’re just too cool for school. But, other times, it’s because they’re great actors and they’re making a conscious choice to keep it real and keep it subtle. Once “the guys upstairs” see that you can do the big stuff they don’t want you to be subtle. They just want you to be big, loud and goofy.

I was watching Robin Williams last night on Leno. He started off funny and manic and he got more and more manic until, by the end, he was screaming so much and so loud that he popped his throat. You could hear that he hurt his vocal chords.

CS: God”¦

DICK: That’s what happens. The audience laughs at your manic-ness and they’re going to stop laughing unless you up the ante and go even more crazy and that’s a trap we fall into as comedians. We’re so desperate to get that laugh that we’ll just keep screaming louder, dancing harder and faster until we’re sweating and panting with blisters on our feet and vocal chords. Yeah, it’s a problem that I have.

I want to please people so bad, and I want to get that laugh, that I keep pushing myself but I prefer the quieter, subtler, sweeter moments.

I prefer the movie SIDEWAYS. I prefer the movie LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE. I saw SIDEWAYS 10 times. I’ve seen LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE 3 times. I walked out of ANCHORMAN. I walked out on WEDDING CRASHERS. Don’t tell anybody, though, because the same producers produced EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH. I am not a big fan of that kind of comedy. That’s something you don’t know about me. You wouldn’t think that. You think the exact opposite. It’s part of my psychoses.

CS: Seeing how your best work really came through in NewsRadio, The Ben Stiller Show, The Andy Dick show on MTV, works that allowed you to control whether you needed to be more subdued or more energetic depending on the situation, are you really going to try and stick with this mantra that “This is my art. You can take it or leave it” and not succumb to the pressures for you to “Dick it up”?

DICK: Yeah, I’m trying.

I’ve been trying and I’m going to continue to try and I think I’m just getting better at it as I get older because I’m 40 but I think the way that it’s really going to work is I’m going to have to do my own stuff. And that’s what DANNY ROANE is all about”¦even DANNY ROANE is a little crazy but there is a lot of subtlety in DANNY ROANE but I can’t, all of a sudden, just bring it all down so much”¦I have to ease people, spoon feed them a little bit, ease them back into”¦EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH was that for me, to a point.

In fact, I read a review for EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH where one of the critics said, “And then Andy Dick as Lon,” and in parenthesis, “(not manic for once.)” In parenthesis! I’ve got to get myself out of those fucking parenthesis.

CS: Thank you so much for your time.

DICK: Fuck you.

##

##

Quick Stop Thingamabobs: 10/24/2006

Filed under: Columns,Thingamabobs — UncaScroogeMcD @ 2:40 am
thingamabobs.jpg

The web. It’s a big place, full of plenty of distractions ““ some funny, some informative, some ludicrous, some disturbing, some inane, some profound. Each and every weekday, we present links to a few of our favorite finds”¦

————————————————

  • Go watch the first four minutes of Borat. Is very funny. (Thingamabob)
  • And they say advertising lies… It seems beauty is in the eye of the Photoshop filter. (Thingamabob)
  • Taking Congress back, one Jedi at a time. (Thingamabob)
  • In celebration of the release of the (hopefully) first volume of Sesame Street: Old School on DVD, how about a classic tune about a man and his Duckie? (Thingamabob)
  • Lewis Black on the Reality TV Writers strike… (Thingamabob)

Have a THINGAMABOB? Send it in!

##

Party Favors: Of Mouse And Man

Filed under: Columns,Joe Corey's Party Favors — UncaScroogeMcD @ 2:39 am
partyfavors1.jpg

ORLANDO – Why do parents insist on bringing kids to Disney World? Are they gluttons for punishment? Or are they merely sadists that enjoy ruining vacations for everyone else?

Disney wants us to think we’re going to “the happiest place on Earth.” But after you cleared the turnstiles, you’ve entered the world’s largest a K-Mart.  If ever there was a land where parents want to beat their kids, it’s the Magic Kingdom. The cast members should wear a pin declaring, “Can I hold your purse while you shut up your brat?”

If your child isn’t 40 inches high, don’t bring them to Orlando. Why haul a kid to Florida that can’t get on the E ticket rides? I can’t stand having to watch 36 inch kids whine about why they can’t ride Space Mountain. They whine and cry longer than the ride – including the walk through the concourse. Worse is idiot parents that haven’t a clue how tall their kids are. They take them halfway through the line only to see junior not measure up at the entrance. I get to experience their kid screaming at the gate demanding a chance to die in the dark. Remembering when thinning the herd was a positive part of child rearing?

The 30 inch high kid is the perfect height to ride my knee when they dart around the park trying to make a break for Donald Duck’s arms. Instead of being able to enjoy the beauty of my surrounds, most of my time I have to look down to make sure that I don’t stomp a tyke or two. Amazingly enough, it becomes my problem when I break their kid’s nose. How am I supposed to enjoy myself with a constant fear of being carted away in cuffs and facing a million dollar lawsuit? What is so wrong with keeping kids on a leash? And remember to pay extra for the muzzle.

If the height thing is a little too tough for you to figure out with your child, here’s a simple approach: if you have to push your kid in a stroller – don’t go to Disney.

Wanna know what’s slower than a baby being pushed in a stroller? A baby being pushed in a stroller by their grandparents. Some of us have come to a theme park to get on as many rides as humanly possible. The worst part is they clump up and swap “cute grandkid” stories as their paces slows down But the molasses disaster patrol can gunk up any smooth experience. NFL offensive line coaches should visit Orlando to learn the geriatric blocking patterns.

I want to be able to relax and enjoy myself in the land of Mickey Mouse. It costs $67 for a one day pass and another $45 for the park hopper. After taxes I’ve forked out $120 to witness parents berating their kid to stop whining or they’re going back to the hotel. They’re blowing my cool. I paid for fun and instead I’m getting to relive my own childhood trauma trips. I’m going to have to pay a shrink $200 an hour to recover from my vacation.

What really gets these family squabbles going is the huge amount of Disney merchandise that little kids want. Disney World is a huge gift shop interrupted by lines for rides. In the Magic Kingdom only 2 major rides don’t end in giftshops (The Haunted Mansion and Thunder Mountain Railroad). There’s dozens of “gimme” moments to hurdle when it comes to little kids. I don’t get the necessity of Disney to overwhelm us with giftshops. All of Main Street is a giftshop. Who wants to buy large amounts of glassware after getting off a ride? Where are you supposed to put this stuff when it’s time to get on Space Mountain? The obvious answer is to shove it down your kids throat when he won’t zip his yap. But that’s illegal under Florida law.

You really shouldn’t take your kids to Disney World until they’re old enough to drive you to Florida. And if the little ones want to go, just take them to Hooters. They get a rush out of a riding around the table in the arms of a waitress in a tanktop.

TEARS FOR A GLOBE

EPCOT is the saddest place in the universe (outside of A-Rod’s bathroom). The episode of The Simpsons where the family gets stuck in a nightmarish theme park based on EPCOT isn’t a joke. Walt’s dream of a society that pushes the boundaries of science hasn’t merely been abused by the Disney suits. It’s been beaten to death by Walt’s own creation.

Unlike the hustle and bustle that meets you at the gates of the Magic Kingdom, the longest ride at EPCOT is the security shakedown. Can I just ponder what’s the point of merely looking in a purse? If you’re an active terrorist, are you really just going to put your tools of destruction in your Birken Bag?

And it is at the gate that you can immediately tell that Disney is giving up on EPCOT as a vision of the future. The amazing Geodesic Globe has now been defaced with a Mickey Mouse arm and stars strewn across it’s surface.  And the topiary bushes in front of the dome are shaped like characters from Beauty and the Beast. Who needs the future when you can have Disney magic tossed in your face? The buildings of Future World look way too educational for their own good.

The saving grace of EPCOT can be summed up in one word: Booze! Yes, the whole point of going to this theme park is dinner in the World Showcase with real booze from around the world.

The bad part is that it must be a two mile walk to get from the gate to the imported beer and wine. In the Florida heat and humidity, it’s inhumane. When it comes to visions of the future, nothing tops The Jetsons. Did you ever see George and Jane walking to dinner? Why doesn’t Disney have stinking people movers in their recreation of tomorrow? And it seemed like a majority of the people in the park wanted to get to the World Showcase.

Disney needs to convert the Future area to what people want – Land of Booze! Why not give us an exhibit courtesy of Jack Daniels, Jim Beam and Aristocrat? And for the ladies, come on down to the lake to see how Cabana Boy mixes up the good stuff.

WHO RUNG IN?

While the new snazzy set on Jeopardy looks great, they need to fix the lights that declare which contestant has buzzed in first. On the long shot, I can barely see the row of thin red lights pop up. My TV set is bigger than a Watchman. Why must Alex and the gang be so secretive in letting us know which of the three is going to belt out the question? Are they hiding it from the terrorists?

BAM!

Will Barry Scott (Mr. Easy-Off Bam!) duke it out with Billy Mays (Kaboom!) for most annoying pitchman that isn’t selling Head On? I’ve already seen one ad with Barry and I already want to throw a Bloomin’ Onion at his head. And what’s up with importing this guy from Australia? Are we lacking annoying goofs in this country? We need immigration reform to protect the future jerks being raised in America.

WHO ARE YOU CALLING FOR?

Will Citibank outsource their phonebank to a part of India that speaks English? What’s the point of calling it customer service if a customer has to call up the UN for a translator to figure out how to get serviced? I can’t even cuss at these folks across the world because they don’t know my kind of swearing. Remember when we were merely pissed off at getting routed around the phone wizard? We just wanted a human voice. And now we’re paying for it since these loser businesses went cheap.

BLOOMIN’ FUN HUM

Hurray for the “Outback Tonight” jingle for the Outback Steakhouse. Enough with just recycling the same classic rock tunes to push your product. Give us the tunes that sell the tasty products!  The jingle is the best new song on the radio this season. Now I’m ready for another Bloomin’ Onion!

HAMMER HURT HER!

Before Dancing With the Stars started the new season, Tom DeLay sent out an email telling his supporters to call up and vote for Sara Evans, the country music star. “We need to send a message to Hollywood and the media that smut has no place on television by supporting good people like Sara Evans,” wrote DeLay. Well a few weeks into the show Evans has filed for divorce and it’s pretty f’n ugly. She’s claiming her husband was a horn dog who didn’t mind sitting around watching porn while his son walked into the room. Plus the guy cheated on her with the nanny. Evan’s husband is now getting word out that she was a bad mother who neglected her kids while dancing for the show. Plus word is spreading that she was boffing Kenny Chesney.

What sort of “good people” is Sara Evans? DeLay was trying to slam Jerry Springer, but it appears that Evans and her husband are running around a stage in Chicago throwing chairs, flashing boobs and being held back by Steve. Thanks to disgraced ex-Congressman DeLay, we’ve once again been fooled into supporting the morally degenerate Showbiz weasels. Maybe Evans isn’t one of those evil Hollywood freaks, but country music is a world of sex freaks and drug abusers.

The fun part is that Kenny Chesney has already said that he didn’t have sex with Sara Evans. “He would NEVER think of her like that,” said a Cheney PR flack. Insert laughter from the bullriders who have their own theory about Kenny and women. If anything could have helped it’s reputation, it would have been to release videotapes. Of course we live in a universe where David Geffen, the gayest man in Hollywood has boffed Marlo Thomas and Cher.

I wonder about the relationship between DeLay and Sara Evans? Maybe the Hammer earned his nickname the old fashioned way? Chesney said that they are merely “good friends” and DeLay used those same words. Hmmmm?

All I need to know right now is that Sara Evans is now responsible for a lot of smut being aired on TV thanks to her disgusting lifestyle. Perhaps DeLay needs to send out an email to America for promoting a pack of pervs, Quit hurtin’ us, Hammer.

BOO!

After crapping out for the past few years, both TCM and AMC have gone overboard on providing monster flicks for this Halloween season.

Contest: Win a Silver Screen Edition Dracula from Sideshow Collectibles!

Filed under: Contests — UncaScroogeMcD @ 1:01 am

Quick Stop Entertainment, in partnership with Sideshow Collectibles, is giving away a Silver Screen Edition Dracula, courtesy of the fine folks at Sideshow. Don’t miss your chance to win this premium format figure.

Enter the contest!
Email: 
First name: 
Last name: 
Street Address: 
Address Line 2 (if needed): 
City: 
State/Province/Whatever: 
Zip Code/Postal Code: 
Country: 
Birth Month:
Birth Day:
Birth Year:
Subscribe me to the
Sideshow Collectibles Newsletter!

Official Rules

No member of Quick Stop Entertainment or their immediate families may enter. (Darn I hate this rule!!!!).

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

All individuals who opt-in to receiving the Sideshow Collectibles Newsletter understand that they will be receiving e-mail newsletters from Sideshow Collectibles, which details their new licenses, upcoming products, monthly giveaways, and guest interviews! Entrants understand and agree to Sideshow Collectibles’ privacy policy, and understand that they may cancel their Sideshow Collectibles Newsletter subscription at anytime. No purchase is necessary to win this contest.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59PM, EST, October 31, 2006.

Important Shipping Information:

All winners agree to pay shipping on any prizes granted by Sideshow Collectibles during any contest or giveaway. Specific details can be found in our contest terms section. Please read these carefully before entering.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after announcement of win to receive the product. All prizes are non-transferable, with no cash redemptions and/or substitutions except at Sponsor’s sole discretion. All international winners will be responsible for any duties, tariffs, taxes or import fees assessed to their prize. Further some countries outside of the U.S. do not have reliable mail services. In the event that a prize has been stolen or mishandled during shipment to an international destination, Sideshow may not be able to replace the specific item. If the winner prefers a specific quicker shipping method, they are responsible to notify us immediately and will also be responsible to cover the additional costs if any.

Delivery time & Restrictions:

All continental US orders are shipped FedEx ground service. Because FedEx cannot provide tracking numbers for P.O. Boxes, Sideshow Collectibles will no longer ship to a P.O. Box. Please provide your street address or your shipment will be delayed. For FedEx Ground deliveries, please allow up to 6 business days for delivery from the date your order is shipped. Please visit the Sideshow Collectibles website for restrictions on International Shipping.

October 23, 2006

A Message From John Hodgman

Filed under: Articles — UncaScroogeMcD @ 5:49 am

##

hodgman-01.jpg

AS YOU MAY KNOW, Jonathan Coulton and I will be visiting Square Books in Oxford, Mississippi this Saturday, Oct 28, at 4PM.

NOW IT HAS COME TO OUR ATTENTION that, in addition to being a lovely, leafy, whiskey-soaked town, final resting place of the corpse of William Faulkner, and seat of Lafayette County, OXFORD ADDITIONALLY ENJOYS SPORTS.

Especially: OLE MISS FOOTBALL.

IN FACT, there will be a FOOTBALL CHALLENGE that very morning between the Ole Miss Rebels and the Auburn Fierce Footballers, or whatever they are called.

(I DO NOT KNOW ABOUT SPORTS.)

WHAT THIS MEANS, according to the very kind staff Square Books is as follows…

A) Everyone in town will be drunk.
B) After the game, it is hard to say who will want to come to a 4PM reading
of FAKE TRIVIA.
C) But we should come on down anyway and hang out and have a drink.

LISTEN: this all sounds fine to me.

HOWEVER, it occurs to me that there may in fact be some people in Oxford, in greater Mississippi , and even Southern Tennessee who do not love sports and might enjoy this non-sporting event.

hodgman-02.jpgFOR THEM, I offer the humble alternative: fake trivia, and fellowship, and also BRANDY.

FOR IN FACT, though I am useless at sports, I do like the drunk part. And so, Coulton and I have agreed to serve at this particular reading a BRANDY SANGAREE to all legal persons in attendance.

A SANGAREE, as you surely know, is a reviver, a pick-me-up, a transitional drink from one intoxication to the other, providing a perfect 4PM brandy twilight from the boozy morning tailgaiting to the late night rowdyness that is sure to follow.

SURELY THIS IS AN OFFER EVEN A SPORTSMAN CANNOT DENY!

SO I ASK OF YOU, friends in the South and on the Internet, please spread word of this affair to your non-sporting friends and let them know a Sangaree awaits them in the beautiful town square.

AND OF YOU, Oxfordians, I ask you to forgive us for being different and asthmatic and strange: a Sangaree awaits you as well, should you wish to rest your Rebel head for a moment atop a pile of books full of words.

LET US JOIN TOGETHER for once, and show the world that there can be peace between these two tribes, PEACE THROUGH BRANDY, and FAKE TRIVIA.

AND THEN everyone can buy books and get on with their lives.

AS THE WEEK GOES ON, I will occasionally remind you of this event, and maybe ask for some help with getting all the brandy and nutmeg together.

FOR NOW, though, I leave you with a particularly poetic bit of copy from the Square Books events page:

“THIS IS WHAT YOU THINK IT IS”

which is to say

THAT IS ALL

–John Hodgman

Visit John Hodgman on the web at www.areasofmyexpertise.com

Read the Quick Stop interviews with John Hodgman & Jonathan Coulton.

hodgman-06.jpg

Spook’d #100: Extreme Lair Makeover – Furniture in a Flash

Filed under: Comic Strips,Spook'd — UncaScroogeMcD @ 4:30 am

by Jeffery Stevenson and Seth Damoose with colors by Anthony Lee

Larger sized comic | ARCHIVES | OLDER ARCHIVES

Spook'd #100: Furniture in a Flash

To see Spook’d host Alastor’s blogging silliness and more fun Spook’d stuff,visit the Spook’d Web site!

Check out the preview to…

E-MAIL WRITER | ABOUT JEFF | ABOUT SETH | SPOOK’D BLOG | SPOOK’D FORUM | ARCHIVES | OLDER ARCHIVES

Disclaimer: All material in Spook’d is fictitious and intended solely for the purpose of entertainment. Names are fabricated and any similarity to real people or places is purely coincidental except in those cases where public figures are being satirized.

Preachin’ From The Longbox: I’ve Lost That Loving Feeling

Filed under: Columns,Preaching from the Longbox — UncaScroogeMcD @ 4:27 am
longbox.gif

The Last Sermon – “I’ve Lost That Loving Feeling”

October 23, 2006

I’ve finally lost it.New York aka Tiffany from Flavor of Love 2

Not in a postal sense. And not in the sense of losing it like New York’s going out with her verbal guns a-blazin’ when she got bounced by Flavor Flav in the “The Flavor of Love 2″ finale. I would say that she should save that drama for her mama but it seems like that’s where she got it from in the first place. That girl has more baggage than Samsonite.

Actually, I think that I’ve hit some sort of mental wall and in the process, I’ve lost my passion for writing about comics. Well, at least for the time being.

To get a better grip on why I lost this drive, I went through some personal inventory. Obviously, some of the blame has to do reside me and I’ll own up to that fact. While I often derive a sense of accomplishment from bringing a “different” view on the world of comics while not trying to be serious about the whole industry, it is no longer as fun as it used to be in recent months. That has never more apparent than by the recent delays in the posting of the PftL columns; normally they were posted on a bi-weekly schedule but now have slid into an almost once a month-ish, when I have something to say kind of pattern. That’s not good. Also, while I’ve always claimed that I’m an unabashed hypocrite in most respects, I’m finding it more and more difficult to constantly bitch about some comic books that are always delayed when my own columns miss multiple deadline dates.

I also seem to have lost my, for lack of better words, comic book radar. I pride myself in trying to unearth comic book nuggets and offer them to you, the reader, on a four-color platter. But within the past few months, I’ve missed writing about a couple of topical things:

“Aquaman” pilot on iTunes ““ How could this slipped past me? I found out about this from Entertainment Weekly and after verifying that it was there, I couldn’t look myself in the mirror for a couple of days. How can I call myself a comic book columnist if I didn’t know that this Smallville spin-off was in existence? It is almost inexcusable.

“Space Sentinels: The Complete Series & Freedom Force: The Complete Series” ““ Again, how long have I been asleep at the wheel? This set was released back at the end of August and I just found out about it yesterday night. I’m so about the old Filmation superhero junk. I would’ve pimped this stuff at least a full month before it came out. For no other reason other than to make sure that there will be more of this classic 70s-80s Saturday Morning cartoon stuff out on DVD. At least, I can mark a December date in my calendar for the release of “Dungeon & Dragons: The Complete Series”.

Alright, back to the subject at hand. Typically, I should be able to write a column about comic books with my eyes closed (and if you read some of my older columns, it may literally be the case). But the fault is not all at my feet. The books themselves have left me, for the lack of better words ““ speechless or for the problem for the continuation of this column, wordless. And obviously, that’s not a good thing.

Currently, the mission of both Big Two in the comic book industry is hopelessly devoted to one thing, which is that money-grabbing and decompression-abusing practice that is also known as company-wide crossovers. Bruce Hornsby and the Range

Now, before any of you out there rightly say that there are many more genres to comic books for people to read other than an overindulgence of the Big Two’s superhero comic books, I can only say two things:

One ““ Despite the emergence of Image, Dark Horse, Oni Press, IDW, Boom Studios, Viper, and the rest of the smaller publishers, the comic book industry rises and falls on the weekly output that transpires from the Big Two. I wish that it wasn’t the case because there really are some inspired books being created and sold. But as Bruce Hornsby sang all those years ago, “That’s just the way it is. Some things will never change.”

Two ““ I was “made” into this business as a tights-and-cape guy over twenty years ago and I can’t seem to shake it. Trust me; I know that I’m not the only one who still feels that way.

Trying to keep up with these 100-plus inter-connected monthly titles (plus stand alone title) is mentally, not to mention physically, exhausting. You can’t swing a dead cat in a comic book shop without hitting at least ten books that don’t have somewhere on the cover bearing either Identity Crisis, Infinite Crisis, Year One, House of M, DeciMation, or Civil War logo. That’s too prevalent; especially for my liking.The Worst Movieof 2006

All of this stuff is so in my something-to-bitch-about wheelhouse; just in case you didn’t know. And yet, I don’t have the impetus to transcribe my feelings into words. It’s as if I have this feeling that I haven’t had since I took that Home Economics class back in seventh grade, which is the same one I have for the lame 80s parity, Totally Awesome. That feeling is one of the seven deadly sins that scared Billy Batson into becoming Captain Marvel all those years ago ““ Apathy.

Once I finally realized that I’ve turned apathetic toward the world of comic books (actually, the industry itself, to be specific), I went through my options and went with what would be best for everyone involved. It wasn’t an easy decision to make and it has been something that I’ve been wrestling with for a couple of months. But, I’ve decided that a break from writing about the subject would be probably the best thing that I could do.

But, dry those eyes; the end of this column doesn’t mean that I’ll be leaving this cyber plane any time in the near future. As time permits, I plan on still posting (albeit a little more frequently) on my official site and also on my page on MySpace. So, hopefully, you all can come by and say “Hi” when the urge strikes you.

So, to put a black ribbon on this closing ceremony, let me send some gratitude to the following people/groups/organizations/etc.:

To Mr. Kevin Smith ““ for sinking some of his vast fortune into a site that was a running gag in one of his movies just so schlubs like me can feel better about writing utter nonsense and have it treated like a respectable piece of quasi-journalism.

To Ryall ““ the one who “made” me. Seriously, thanks for giving me the initial opportunity to come here to the bastard offspring of the View Askewinverse and to still keep in touch even as he’s beginning his second stage of dominating the comic book landscape (which will still be denied until his master plan removes variant covers from the face of the Earth).

To Ming ““ for being rock solid and helping out whenever I asked a stupid question, which was more times than I care to remember.

To UncaScroogeMcD ““ for keeping the home fires burning with QSE. Keep the faith, man.

To the MPS/QSE board members (Ozchick, JJ, Fanny, JK, Zens, By-Tor, Robbo, TK, DbleA, Phit, Ratm, Bamms, RB, Jason B, and the gang) ““ thanks for welcoming me in without too many reservations and for allowing me to hang out on the best board on the Internets.

To all of the pros (like Keith Giffen, Ross Ritchie from Boom Studios, Larry Young from AiT/Planet Lar, Wes Molebash, Steve Rolston, Chris Pitzer from AdHouse Books) that I’ve met through this column ““ thanks for the free merch and for the words of encouragement.

To my lifers, Eddie C and Chet K ““ thanks for hanging in there when no one else did. I’ll always remember that.

To the readers of Preachin’ from the Longbox ““ words can’t totally express the gratefulness that I have for each and everyone of y’all out there in the sea of the Net so I won’t even try other than say, “Thanks”.

Finally, to my wife, Teresa, and my two kids, Brady and Chloe – being in my corner during this two-year, non-paying, stay-up-real-late-at-night run at being a pontificator of all things comics for a pop-culture website. Sure, it wasn’t all that easy. But not one of you voiced your complaints. Well, at least not about this stuff. I’ll make it up to you all. Promise.

So, with all that being said, it’s time to close up shop and bid adieu for now. With a heavy sigh, here, for the last time at this residence, are my parting words:

Don’t forget to keep your bags and boards together and your continuity straight.

Hope to see you around,

-britt

Nocturnal Admissions: Movie Review, The Departed, Part 3

Filed under: Columns,Nocturnal Admissions — UncaScroogeMcD @ 4:18 am
nocturnalheader5.gif

I’ve probably said all I must say about The Departed, and should move on to Marie Antoinette, The Prestige, or Running with Scissors, but I happened to see the film again, at a terrific theater in Vancouver, Washington, called Cinetopia, and it inspired some further thoughts about the film. And also it’s a Martin Scorsese movie, AKA, one by “our “greatest living director,” which merits as much comment as possible. But I’ve been surprised at how cool my enthusiasm for the film has turned, and I’ve been intrigued by anti-Scorsese backlash articles, such as Tom Scocca’s in the New York Observer (not on line for free, but page 8 of the October 9 issue), in which he asserts that Scorsese is not really the grand old man of movies but rather more a master of scenes rather than the whole, and at David Bordwell’s blog and the response at Jim Emerson’s site. Bordwell maintains that The Departed is sloppily edited – and bear in mind that Scorsese started out as an editor. But all this commentary and a second viewing got me to thinking about it again, and that led to a series of unrelated observations. [By the way, the “errors” of continuity that Bordwell points out – a dancing desert, an appearing and disappearing can of beer – are on second viewing not errors at all. ]

DeCaprio blue
  • Where does the title come from? There is a small card among the flora on Billy Costigan’s mother’s catafalque, saying “Heaven Holds the Faithful Departed.” The card is from Costello. I’m guessing that the title refers to how the dead hover over us and guide our present. But in general this movie is death obsessed, much more so than Infernal Affairs, wrongly accused by everyone from Ballhaus to the Nation‘s Stuart Klawans, who obviously hasn’t see it, of being crude, non-stop violence. That movie was about identity. This one is about playing parts. But in the face of death. I accused it originally of going “a body too far” in its climax, but that actually just a measure of Scorsese’s morbidity. The most famous exchange in the film is a guy saying to Costello that his mother is “on her way out,” with Costello replying, “We all are. Act accordingly.” Costello’s behaviour in the face of death is to act like a hedonistic nut.
    Matt
  • This is the gayest Scorsese film since Raging Bull. There are numerous gay subtext and sub-themes in the film, but the most obvious concerns the snazzily dressed Sullivan’s homophobia – impotence. He calls the members of the Boston firemen rugby team homos, can’t get it up with Madolyn Madden (why does Vera Farmiga almost always play characters with alliterative names: she was also Jocelyne Jordan in The Manchurian Candidate), and resents being mistaken for gay by the guy selling him a condo.
  • It may be that Sullivan is more interested in power than sex. I didn’t really follow why he was always looking at the gold Boston state house dome so covetously. But I read in a blog somewhere that it’s a measure of his ambition. Why stop at being a cop? Why not go all the way? DA (he’s taking night classes in law)? State senator? Governor? This aspect of his character isn’t fully fleshed out, however.
    Kiss
  • Sex
  • The first time I saw the film I was a little irked that they had condensed the two women in Infernal Affairs into one. Then, after the film opened, I read in Variety that to the surprise of Warner Bros., the film was tracking very well with women viewers. At that point I realized that this was probably a cunning move on the part of Scorsese and Monahan. What woman could resist identifying with a character who had both Leonardo DiCaprio and Matt Damon fighting over her?
  • I’m baffled as to why Vera Farmiga has received such a drubbing from the reviewers. On one level she looks cute and professional in her three piece suit; at the other end of the scale, she does things with her part that I don’t feel like I’ve seen before, behavioral choices that seem fresh and original, the way Brando’s approach did in the 1950s. She veers from sternly professional and vulnerable, grappling with the differing pulls of honesty and the necessity to lie, which is one of the themes of the film. I feel that she is being terribly underrated.
  • Vera
  • This time around I noticed the red-lettered book Violence in the Streets on the shelf behind Madolyn’s desk. Should I be impressed with the attention to detail or dismayed at the obviousness (and blankness) of that plant?
  • Nicholson’s Costello is in the tradition of Scorsese characters who don’t communicate well. Think of the incoherent diner chats in  Taxi Driver, or the misunderstandings in  Mean Streets. No one ever really seems to understand what others are saying, and Costello confuses his auditors, who grow to think he is crazy.
  • I’ve read that Scorsese had to be convinced to make this movie, as he has so many others in the past. Plus, he reportedly hasn’t seen the source film. And the film is set in Boston rather than New York, and concerns Irish gangsters instead of Italians. Do these elements account for the patina of frostiness and lack of invention in the film?
  • The graveside scene at the end of the film is obviously influenced by a similar scene in The Third Man, which is a devastating judgment on a mediocre “good” man who has brought down a charismatic bad man. Costigan’s remark that his hand is steady no matter how tense he may be within is clearly influenced by a key moment in  The Godfather.
    Prison
  • The Departed is on the road to being Scorsese’s most popular film. Isn’t the reason obvious? It is chock full of stars whom people want to see, and the visual technique doesn’t get in the way of the story. It’s just stylish enough. With this film Scorsese has made almost half as many films with DiCaprio (three) as he did with the other “D,” De Niro (eight). You’d think that the younger actor would invigorate his films, but instead these newer films feel stuffed and embalmed, like the late films of Ford and Hitchcock. Still, the presence of DiCaprio brings audiences to see his films.All that being said, I still like The Departed.
  • Quick Stop Thingamabobs: 10/23/2006

    Filed under: Columns,Thingamabobs — UncaScroogeMcD @ 4:10 am
    thingamabobs.jpg

    The web. It’s a big place, full of plenty of distractions ““ some funny, some informative, some ludicrous, some disturbing, some inane, some profound. Each and every weekday, we present links to a few of our favorite finds”¦

    ————————————————

    • Want to hear Peter Gabriel sing like a Muppet? Sure you do… (Thingamabob)
    • OK, so I guess skateboarding and lightning don’t mix? (Thingamabob)
    • The golden age of YouTube as an almost Raiders-like warehouse of rare and obscure clips may be coming to an end, so grab what you can before it’s gone. (Thingamabob)
    • Here’s Michael J. Fox… And here’s hoping people think about what he’s saying. (Thingamabob)

    Have a THINGAMABOB? Send it in!

    ##

    October 21, 2006

    Scrubs Blog: A Guided Tour

    Filed under: Production Blogs,Scrubs Blog — UncaScroogeMcD @ 5:05 am
    scrubsheader.jpg

    VIDEO BLOG #61 & #62: “A Guided Tour: Parts 1 & 2” ““
    The long-promised tour of the first floor of Sacred Heart Hospital has arrived! Your hosts for this tour are Production Designer Cabot McMullen & Art Director Susan Bolles, plus some guy named Rob Maschio (who we hear has a role on the show)…

    scrubs2006-10-20.jpg

    Download Scrubs Video Blog #61:

    • Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 105 MB)
    • Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 45.6 MB)

    Download Scrubs Video Blog #62:

    • Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 103 MB)
    • Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 44 MB)

    ##

    October 20, 2006

    Game On! 10-21-2006

    Filed under: Game On! — admin @ 11:22 pm

    gameon.jpg

    Hey there, friends! Long time, no see, eh? Sorry about the delay in columns over the past two weeks, but sadly, my interview with Jason Mewes for the SCARFACE game fell through. To top it all off, I still haven’t even received a reviewable copy of the game yet. Still, I have some stuff for you this week, including a couple of handheld titles. Let’s check “˜em out”¦

    HAVE GUN SHOWDOWN, WILL TRAVEL

    GUNPSP.jpgOne of my favorite games from last year finally gets the handheld treatment this year with GUN SHOWDOWN hitting the PSP. Taking the core gameplay and spicing things up a bit with mini games and wireless multiplayer, the developers attempt to breathe new life into what is normally a short title, as well as expanding on the story in the main missions for fans of the original to have something fresh to play.

    Sadly, control will keep most of those fans away. Due to the PSP’s constant thorn-in-side of it’s lack of a second analog stick, control is done with the analog stick for movement, and the face buttons for aiming and camera. The d-pad acts as an alternate set of buttons, used for quick draw, mounting horses, refilling health and the like. Aiming is now more of a chore due to this, and it seems that the targeting reticule is actually much less forgiving than the home console version (wherein you could just get part of your enemy lined up in the sights and still be able to take them out). Here, you must be more precise, and it’s difficult to achieve good shots thanks to the clunky button aiming.

    Also, due to the lack of buttons, some have dual features depending on if you press or hold the button down. Numerous times I’ve been riding through the canyons, trying to spur my horse on, only to just make him jump, making chases exasperating. And riding while shooting? Forget about it. Your thumbs will scream in anger.

    GUNPSP2.jpg

    It’s not all bad, however. The graphics actually do a remarkable job of capturing the look of the console big brother, and the audio work is top notch. There’s actually a few new story missions, taken out of the home version (though I’m not sure why) to keep the play time up (and to fill time with some sections removed from the game, like the cannon sequence on the ferryboat at the beginning). There’s even a selection of mini games outside the main game, such as quail hunting or Texas Hold “˜Em.The multiplayer aspect is admirable, but only for those who really want to fiddle with the awkward button aiming for deathmatches. Still, for those that dare to venture, it’s still a good bit of fun, and that’s what really matters, right?

    For me, though, the main reason to play is the extra story stuff. I was a big fan of the original game on the home console, and the story is one of its strongest points. Thankfully, the original voice cast (including Tom Jane as hero Colton White) all return for the game, even in the new sequences. Beyond that, though, if you’ve already played the game, there’s not a whole lot new here to warrant another purchase for the handheld version. The graphics are sharp and the story is good, but the controls will drive most fans away, much as most shooters do for this console. It worked for GOLDENEYE on N64, but nowadays, most gamers won’t put up with it anymore.

    One Gamer’s Opinion:

    ok.jpg

    WHAT A BOMB

    bombaz.jpgOkay, by now, I’m sure many of you have read about BOMBERMAN ACT: ZERO and how MOST fans of the series are angered by it. How the game’s style has been changed, taking away the cute cartoon character and setting him in a futuristic cyber inspired setting and removing most of the advances the multiplayer games have made. And I can understand that. And while the game does have its faults (for some, there are many) it does have at least one thing going for it: good multiplayer.

    But, let’s go over the list of faults first. Fault number one: in the single player game, there is no save system. At all. None. There are 99 levels in the single player game. If you die in level 98, you’ll have to start all over again at the beginning. That sucks.

    Fault number two: many of the game’s better power-ups (such as the Glove and the Boot) are gone. You can’t kick bombs away and you can’t pick them up and throw them. Sure there is block-through and bomb-through, allowing you to pass through the dangers unharmed, but the removal of those first two power-ups seems like a step backwards.

    Fault number three: the futuristic setting is just lame. Bomberman is a cute little dude with a helmet who just happens to plant deadly bombs in a puzzle room. He is not some cyborg in a prison doomed to fight his way to a dystopian surface world.

    Fault number four: and this is the most glaring fault-there is NO SINGLE CONSOLE MULTIPLAYER. For a game that ids widely known as a party game, this is inexcusable. Sure, there’s multiplayer on Xbox Live, but what about actually, I don’t know, having friends over and playing? Are they that afraid of human contact nowadays?

    bombaz2.jpg

    Beyond these four things, the game is actually kind of enjoyable in a weird way. There’re the single player missions, which I mentioned, but there’s actually a good bit of strategy needed to continue on. With single player you can choose to play it in standard traditional top down mode, or a new (and challenging, but honestly unneeded) mode called FPB (which I can only assume stands for First Person Bomberman). Here the camera is positioned behind BM’s shoulder and you can swing the camera around to see your surroundings and those around you bombing like mad. One saving grace for this mode is the health bar, since one hit kills in this mode would just make games cheap and annoying.The multiplayer is the game’s strongest point and the only argument for owning the title, however. With a good deal of options for making room (pressure blocks falling after a timer counts down, FPB mode, battle royal, etc) it’s the best and most fun way to play the game. Again, why there’s no version of this for single console multiplayer play is beyond me (sure, I guess FPB mode wouldn’t work on one console unless you did split screen”¦but hey, why not that?). What’s found on Xbox Live (that is, if you can find someone who actually owns this game) however is still what makes BOMBERMAN great: good multiplayer action full of surprises and strategy.

    Fans of the series are understandably disappointed with this release. However, past the cosmetic changes and a ridiculous no save feature, there still is a little bit to enjoy. Whether or not it’s for you is up to you to decide.

    One Gamer’s Opinion:

    eh.jpg

    QUICKSHOT OF THE WEEK

    contact.jpgDS fans are starting to get a good deal more RPGs for the system, and old school genre fans will have something to enjoy this week once CONTACT is released. With a style reminiscent of EARTHBOUND for NES, the game takes a leisurely pace through islands and worlds as you help guide a boy in his quest to get a scientist back to the future (among other oddball revelations). The player actually plays an active role in the story too, even so far as being addressed outside of the main game, breaking the fourth wall between gamer and game, making the title essentially about three characters: the boy, the scientist and you. Combat is a unique hybrid between turn based and real time that includes steady attacks and real time movement and even includes mid-fight leveling. It’s a interesting title to be sure, and one that old school RPG fans should really check out.

    One Gamer’s Opinion:

    righton.jpg

    CRAPTACULAR GAME OF THE WEEK

    rengokuII.jpgSadly, the same cannot be said for RENGOKU II: STAIRWAY TO H.E.A.V.E.N. on PSP. Usually most sequels, especially ones in which the original did not do well, try to improve on the ideas and gameplay styles of the original. Not this one. Everything is the same, from the clunky control, to the horribly ugly randomized backgrounds. For those not familiar with the original (and count yourselves lucky) you are a battle cyborg trapped in a tower who must fight other creations like you. When you win, you obtain their weapons, which you attach to either your arms, head or back to augment your fighting powers. Each room and level of the game is completely randomly generated, making multiple playthroughs the aim. Sadly, when each background looks as dull and crummy as this, it doesn’t matter that they’re randomized. The combat is also horrible, with sloppy lock on and just bad tiny animations. I gave the first game a chance, but this one, which should have at least improved something in someway, is just more of the same crap.

    One Gamer’s Opinion:

    stinker.jpg

    Well, on that note, we bring this week’s column to an end. Next week, we have some big time releases, just in time for the holiday rush, including BULLY, SPLINTER CELL: DOUBLE AGENT, GOD HAND and maybe, just maybe, SCARFACE. “˜Til then, gamers”¦

     

    THE GAME ON! RATING SYSTEM

     

     

    gameonratingscomplete.jpg

     

    Kick-Ass, Right On, Okay, Eh, and Stinker (or Craptacular)

     

    Comics in Context #151: The New Old Masters

    Filed under: Columns,Comics in Context — admin @ 8:30 pm
    comicsincontext4.jpg

    cic2006-10-20.jpgHas the fine art world’s growing interest in comics and cartoons achieved critical mass? If not quite yet, it is certainly rapidly getting closer, as evidenced by the surprising number of shows devoted to comic and cartoon art this fall in New York City, the capital of the American art world, and its vicinity.

    At the top of the list is the large traveling exhibition “Masters of American Comics,” which is a collection of mini-retrospectives for fifteen cartoonists whose careers together span the history of the artform in the Twentieth Century and into the Twenty-First: Winsor McCay (Little Nemo in Slumberland), Lyonel Feininger (The Kin-der-Kids), George Herriman (Krazy Kat), E. C. Segar (Thimble Theatre Starring Popeye), Frank King (Gasoline Alley), Chester Gould (Dick Tracy), Milton Caniff (Terry and the Pirates), Charles Schulz (Peanuts), Will Eisner (The Spirit), Jack Kirby (Fantastic Four), Harvey Kurtzman (MAD), Robert Crumb (Mr. Natural), Art Spiegelman (Maus), Gary Panter (Jimbo) and Chris Ware (Jimmy Corrigan).

    Curated by art scholar John Carlin and comic strip historian Brian Walker (see “Comics in Context” #66 and 71), the “Masters” show debuted last year in Los Angeles, where it was divided between the Hammer Museum and the Museum of Contemporary Art. The exhibition moved to the Milwaukee Art Museum before arriving in the New York City area, split between the Jewish Museum, several blocks up the street from the Metropolitan Museum of Art, and the Newark Museum in New Jersey.

    Yale University Press has published the handsomely designed catalogue for the show, which not only includes reproductions of the artwork and a lengthy treatise by co-curator Carlin, but also features a commendable assortment of essays about the individual Masters by a wide array of non-academics, including jazz critic Stanley Crouch on Herriman, cartoonist (and screenwriter for the 1980 live action Popeye movie) Jules Feiffer, journalist Pete Hamill on Caniff, Mutts creator Patrick McDonnell on Schulz, Village Voice film critic J. Hoberman on Kurtzman, Simpsons creator Matt Groening on Panter, and novelist Dave Eggers on Ware.

    Regular readers of this column will recall my report on the “Masters of American Comics” panel held at this year’s San Diego Comic Con (see “Comics in Context” #145).

    And there’s lots more. Accompanying the “Masters” show at the Jewish Museum is “Superheroes: Good and Evil in American Comics,” an exhibit of original artwork from superhero comics of the “Golden Age” of the 1940s, curated by one of that period’s leading figures, Jerry Robinson (see “Comics in Context” #141). Like the “Masters” show at both museums, “Superheroes” will run through January 29, 2007.

    The “Masters” show has inspired controversy since all of the cartoonists selected for this honor are male. But this fall New York City hosted two exhibits of work by female cartoonists. The Museum of Comic and Cartoon Art has staged “She Drew Comics: 100 Years of Women Cartoonists,” curated by Trina Robbins, which continues into early November. The Adam Baumgold Gallery on 74 W. 79th St. just closed its fall show, “Telling Tales: Contemporary Women Cartoonists” (curated by Dan Nadel and including works by Roz Chast, Phoebe Gloeckner, Aline Kominsky-Crumb, and others), which followed its late summer show, “Jules Feiffer: The Strips, 1960-2000.”

    Aside from the African-American George Herriman, all of the cartoonists in the “Masters” show are white, but “African Comics“ opens at the Studio Museum in Harlem on November 15 and runs through March 18, 2007.

    Until October 21 the Society of Illustrators is running a thirtieth anniversary retrospective of comics published by Fantagraphics (including works by Daniel Clowes, Frank Frazetta, Bill Griffith, Jaime Hernandez, Stan Sakai, and Chris Ware) at its Museum of American Illustration in midtown Manhattan.

    Even the United Nations has turned its attention to cartoon art. Thanks to the Museum of Comic and Cartoon Art getting me in, on Monday, October 16, I attended “Cartooning for Peace,” a day-long series of seminars with political cartoonists from around the world serving as panelists. The introductory speech was made by the Secretary-General himself, Kofi Annan, whom I would previously have considered the least likely person to turn up at an event I covered in my column. (How much more evidence do you need for a cultural shift in attitudes towards cartoon art?) “Cartooning for Peace” is also the name of an exhibit of political cartoons by these artists that is currently being held in the United Nations’ Visitors’ Lobby before embarking on a world tour. (You can also see these cartoons at www.cartooningforpeace.org.)

    It may be coincidental that so many exhibits on cartoon art are being held at once in New York City. But this isn’t simply a phenomenon restricted to the fall of 2006. Last winter the Museum of Modern Art staged its exhibition of Pixar animation art (see “Comics in Context” #120) and the Pratt Manhattan Gallery featured “Speak: Nine Cartoonists” featuring work by Crumb, Spiegelman, Ware and others, even including Gasoline Alley‘s Frank King (see “Comics in Context” #122). This year on December 1 the Morgan Library and Museum opens “Saul Steinberg: Illuminations“, featuring the work of the late New Yorker artist whose drawings can be classified as either illustrations or cartoons; this exhibit closes on March 4, 2007. The Baumgold Gallery will also be opening a Steinberg show. On the day that the Morgan’s Steinberg show closes, the Museum of Modern Art will open “Comic Abstraction: Image Breaking, Image Making,” billed as an exhibit of work by artists who utilize the “visual language of comics”. (Whether MoMA will deign to display work by actual professional comics artists in this show, I do not yet know.)

    It’s not just New York City that has caught comics fever. On November 2, “Cartoon America: Highlights from the Art Wood Collection of Cartoon and Caricature“ opens in the great hall of the Thomas Jefferson Building of the Library of Congress in Washington D. C.. The Library recently acquired this collection, which includes works by Feiffer, Feininger, Herblock, Herriman, King, McCay, Schulz, Steinberg, and James Thurber, as well as animation art from Disney classics including Fantasia (1940), and arrays them alongside work by Honore Daumier, the 19th century French illustrator and caricaturist who has long been accepted into the pantheon of fine art.

    Back in New York City, the Museum of Comic and Cartoon Art will stage its own exhibit of animation art, “Saturday Morning Cartoons,” opening on November 18 of this year. And this seems the appropriate time and place to announce that I will be co-curating an exhibition on the career of Stan Lee that will open in February 2007 at the Museum of Comic and Cartoon Art. Right now MoCCA is looking for people who are willing to help sponsor the show and collectors who would be willing to lend original artwork from 1960s Marvel comics for display. If any of you are interested, please contact me through the e-mail address for this column (comicsincontext@aol.com).

    But if a cartoon art exhibit falls in a forest, and The New York Times ignores it, did it make a sound? The Times reviewed the Pixar and “Speak” shows last winter, but it has so far ignored all of the fall shows except for “Masters,” which opened on September 15 at the two New York area museums but did not get reviewed by the Times until Friday, October 13. Still, it’s obvious that the Times Arts and Leisure department would put a higher priority on reviewing some of the other high profile art shows on more widely accepted subjects, such as “Cezanne to Picasso” at the Met and “Picasso and American Art” at the Whitney.

    And then there’s the problem of the geographical separation of the two halves of “Masters.” The show was divided between two museums in Los Angeles, but Southern California has a car culture; New York City doesn’t. New Yorkers like myself don’t have cars and rely on public transportation instead. It is difficult enough to persuade a Manhattanite to venture into the dreaded outer boroughs; mounting an expedition to Newark, New Jersey would be closer to inconceivable. (It is indeed a lengthy trip, though there are commuters who must do it every workday.) The exception would be going to the Newark Airport, one of the three airports in the metropolitan area; I’ve been to Newark Airport, but I can’t recall ever having been to Newark proper before. Besides, New Yorkers tend to regard Newark, and New Jersey in general, as uncool. (I’ve spent time in some picturesque sections of the state; then again, I’ve also traveled through industrial areas of New Jersey which Peter Jackson could have used for Mordor.) So I suppose that means that a Manhattanite would be more likely to go to Newark Airport in order to fly to London than he would to go to Newark in order to visit, well, Newark.

    I’m not just kidding about New Yorkers’ reluctance to visit the Garden State. It even seems that one of the reasons that Art Spiegelman, who helped organize “Masters,” withdrew his own work from the show was that he believed that New Yorkers wouldn’t expend the time and trouble to travel all the way out to Newark to see the first half of the show.

    So I can understand that it might take the Times a while to send one of its art critics to museums in two separate cities to cover the same show.

    But the Times review was well worth the wait. It was the paper’s lead art critic, Michael Kimmelman, who reviewed the exhibition, and he declared that “”˜Masters of American Comics’ is a landmark and a pleasure. For many people, I suspect, it will be a revelation too.” (Oct. 13, 2006). It clearly was a revelation to him. Kimmelman was also wise enough to recognize his own limitations in exploring a form of art he wasn’t knowledgeable about and to bring along an expert to guide him: Spiegelman himself played Virgil to Kimmelman’s Dante as they descended into (gasp!) Newark.

    If you follow the link to Kimmelman’s review, you’ll also find the “slide show” of highlights from “Masters,” several of which I will discuss in the course of my own review. Strangely, the Times “slide show” offers two Eisners and two Kirbys, but no examples of work by Crumb, Herriman or Segar.

    I managed to decipher the mysteries of PATH trains and New Jersey Transit sufficiently well to make my own way to the Newark Museum, sans guide, to see the first portion of the “Masters” show: McCay through Schulz. The principal factor in determining how to divide the exhibition between two museums, whether in California or the New York area, seems to be chronological. Jack Kirby started in comics before World War II, but his best work began in the 1960s, so his work was in the Jewish Museum. “Masters” featured some of Chester Gould’s late Dick Tracy strips from the 1960s, but Gould created Tracy in the 1930s and his great period began in the 1940s, so his work was in Newark.

    However, Will Eisner did The Spirit in the 1940s, before Charles Schulz’s creation of Peanuts in the 1950s, but “Masters” placed Schulz with the earlier cartoonists in Newark, while assigning Eisner among the later cartoonists at the Jewish Museum.

    Hence, the Newark portion of “Masters” dealt with the evolution of the American comic strip, from McCay to Schulz. The Jewish Museum’s portion of the exhibit instead chronicled the history of comic books, starting with not only Kirby’s Golden Age work for actual comic books, but also Eisner’s Spirit sections, which were effectively short comic books, for Sunday newspapers, and culminating with Chris Ware’s graphic novels.

    Of course “Masters” begins with Winsor McCay (1869-1934), who is generally regarded as the first genius of both the comics artform and animation. The Newark Museum’s introductory wall text for the McCay section (written by John Carlin?) asserted that “Winsor McCay did for comics what D. W. Griffith did for movies and Louis Armstrong did for music: he transformed mechanical reproduction into a creative medium for self-expression.” The comparison with D. W. Griffith works for me, since Griffith is universally acknowledged as film’s first creative auteur. I’m not so sure about the reference to Armstrong. Did the wall text’s writer meant to imply that McCay, Griffith, and Armstrong were each the first in his medium to create great works of personal expression? Is that true about sound recordings? What about, say, Enrico Caruso?

    Kimmelman interrupts his own discussion of McCay in his review to ask, “Did I mention that Mr. McCay, in his ultra-finicky way, drew like a dream?” That’s a felicitous phrase, since dreams were McCay’s primary subjects: the fantasy worlds dreamed by the title character of Little Nemo in Slumberland and the proto-Twilight Zone nightmares that overtake the hapless sleeping adults in Dream of the Rarebit Fiend. But Kimmelman is pointing out to the reader that McCay was a master of the craft of realistic illustration. McCay’s prowess in delineating reality in naturalistic detail makes the fantastic elements of his strips look real.

    Hence I find it somewhat misleading for Carlin to state in the Masters of American Comics book that “though most Americans were not fully aware of modern art until the Armory Show in 1916″–and actually, I expect that the majority of Americans in 1916 paid no more attention to cutting edge art then than they do today–“they had already seen the essence of modernism in McCay’s comics without knowing it. McCay utilized many of the hallmarks of modernism–figures in motion, twentieth-century machines, and urban architecture–in much the same way as later Cubist and Futurist painters.” But from Cezanne onward, the early figures in the history of modern art were veering away from naturalism, distorting the reality they depicted. McCay’s illustrative realism and his mission to make the fantastic look naturalistic clearly stands at an opposite pole from, say, Picasso’s efforts to deconstruct reality through Cubism. Strictly defined, abstraction does not depict reality at all, yet however much they may metamorphose in his work, McCay was drawing real people and things–and fantastic people and things as if they were just as real. Even in a page included in the show (Feb. 2, 1908), in which McCay impossibly stretches the heads and bodies of Nemo and his companions into fun-house mirror reflections of themselves, McCay is still working from a foundation in reality: what the human figure actually looks like.

    McCay’s work is “abstract” only in the sense that, as the examples in the exhibition show, he paid strong attention to shapes and other design elements in constructing his work. Hence, in a Dream of the Rarebit Fiend page (Sunday, Feb. 9, 1913) that is excerpted on the web page with Kimmelman’s review, the dreamer, a man in formal wear, is running along the street when suddenly, in panel 2, the street curves upward both at the left and the right, distorting the shapes of the tall buildings rising from the street. The dreamer runs like a mouse on an exercise wheel, as the curved street recedes from one panel to the next, until it becomes a multicolored circle, reminiscent of what one might see through a kaleidoscope.

    Similarly, consider the Little Nemo in Slumberland page (Sunday, Dec. 3, 1905) that is included in the Times slide show. The topmost panel not only includes Morpheus, the King of Slumberland (looking quite different than in Neil Gaiman’s Sandman), but also introduces this page’s circular motif in the form of the moon with a face. But this isn’t a benign Man in the Moon but instead looks vaguely sinister.

    The next tier consists of four panels of equal size, the first showing the boy Nemo sleeping in bed. The conventional look of these panels denotes the mundane nature of Nemo’s reality in contrast with the dreamworld. However, these four panels actually show Nemo’s transition from reality into the dreamworld, as his bed rises from the floor and drifts into the night sky.

    Such step-by-step changes from panel to panel must be what Kimmelman meant when he wrote that McCay’s work “married something of [Eadweard] Muybridge’s stop-action photography with Lewis Carroll.” This four-panel segment also exemplifies the Newark Museum’s wall text’s statement that McCay’s “successive action sequences anticipated later experiments in film animation.”

    The large middle section of the page is divided into four panels in which the spherical moon, its mouth ominously agape, steadily grows closer and larger with each succeeding panel, while Nemo’s bed rocks about in the air and falls apart, leaving him helpless to escape the oncoming threat. This middle section of the page is dominated by an immense, circular drawing of the face/moon, enveloped within an oval, thus becoming a fifth panel. This becomes the centerpiece of the entire page, bringing the circle motif to its culmination. (I wonder if this sequence might have been inspired by the sequence of a moon with a face in Georges Melies’ famous 1902 short film A Trip to the Moon.)

    Nemo was shown in square panels in the first tier. In the next four panels, Nemo appeared in rectangular panels, which were invaded by the curvature of the central oval enclosing the moon; the page design thereby dramatizes how this seemingly threatening fantasy world is disrupting Nemo’s sense of reality. In the central oval, Nemo appears within the circle formed by the face/moon: he has been swallowed up by the fantasy world.

    Here the face/moon abruptly turns into a kind of stage set: the servant of Morpheus emerges from the moon’s mouth, as if it were the gateway to a castle, or the backdrop of a theatrical set, to invite Nemo to the king’s court.

    In the final tier of panels, the face/moon continues to grow, frightening Nemo, but it is now so large that its full size cannot be encompassed by an individual panel. The panels have returned to square shape, indicating that Nemo is making the transition back to reality, and in the final panel Nemo indeed wakes up from this latest of his nightmares.

    As the wall text asserts, “McCay brought an abstract formal dimension to comics, which added to the theatrical action that one sees through the panels. This technique allowed the page to be read both as a story told over time and a relation of design elements printed on a page.” This is true, and the use of the moon as backdrop in that central panel is evidence that McCay was alluding to theater. This seems to be a recurring motif in early strips: E. C. Segar created Popeye for a strip called Thimble Theatre.

    But in his review Kimmelman went further, maintaining that McCay’s comics panels “magically blended to make a collective cogent abstraction out of the page: the essence of comics art.” Here we run into trouble.

    As readers of Scott McCloud’s Understanding Comics know, the essence of comics is visual storytelling. Will Eisner renamed comics “sequential art”: the art of conveying a narrative through a sequence of pictures. Kevin Eastman named his comics museum (which is now unfortunately defunct) the Words and Pictures Museum; actual words aren’t necessary to comics, but a narrative is.

    In my writing and lecturing about comics, I deal with comics as literature, emphasizing the narrative, but I try to take care to show how visual imagery plays its part in expressing the themes and characterization. “Masters” goes in the opposite direction. In an online interview I have quoted in a previous installment, “Masters” Brian Walker explained that his fellow co-curator “John [Carlin] helped me understand in the beginning that, in this type of [museum] environment, you really have to search for examples of work that are the most visual – graphically powerful. . . . I’m probably a little more content-oriented, and he’s probably a little more form-oriented.” Walker said at the San Diego “Masters” panel that comics storytellers were not included in the show if they were not considered to be important visual innovators “in layouts or design.”

    This emphasis on visual design over visual storytelling isn’t a major problem in evaluating the work of McCay, whose narratives usually seem primarily to be pretexts for his visual experimentation.

    One of the themes of the “Masters” exhibition appears to be a metafictional approach to comics: comics that are about the comics medium, which draw attention to themselves as fictional constructs, and which draw attention to and play with the conventions of the form.

    For example, the show includes a noted example of McCay’s strip Little Sammy Sneeze, a series which, even more than Herriman’s Krazy Kat, sought to wring infinite variations out of a single basic gag: like Clark Kent in the October 5, 2006 episode of Smallville, aptly titled “Sneeze,” Sammy wreaks destruction whenever he unleashes one of his catastrophic nasal discharges. In this particular example (Sept. 24, 1905), Sammy is pictured within square panels with thick black borders. This time when Sammy sneezes, he shatters the panel borders, and in the last image in the sequence, he sits bewildered among the fragments of the broken borders.

    Similarly, in a Dream of the Rarebit Fiend from April 7, 1907, the dreamer finds himself increasingly covered by ink blots from the unseen cartoonist’s leaky pen.

    The McCay pieces in the exhibition were well chosen, and include examples from such celebrated Little Nemo sequences as “The Palace of Ice” and “Befuddle Hall,” with its vertiginous architecture. It was a particular pleasure to see exhibited here the original art for the Little Nemo Sunday page (Sept. 29, 1907) in which the title character and the Jungle Imp, both at giant size, clambers over Manhattan skyscrapers to arrive at the bank of the East River. Art Spiegelman included this particular installment in his book In the Shadow of No Towers (see “Comics in Context” #60), and since then, Neil Gaiman reprinted it in his 2006 short story collection Fragile Things.

    The “Masters” show also has the same page of Lyonel Feininger’s Kin-der-Kids, “The Kin-der-Kids Abroad: Triumphant Departure of the Kids in the Family Bathtub!!” (May 6, 1906), that Spiegelman ran in No Towers (see “Comics in Context” #59). But this isn’t the original art for the page. In fact, there are only a few examples of the show of Feininger’s original art for comics; most of what is on display are actual newspaper pages on which Feininger’s Sunday comics were printed.

    I was surprised to learn from the labels that these newspaper pages were lent to the “Masters” exhibition by the Museum of Modern Art, to which Julia Feininger had donated them. During its long history the Museum of Modern Art has mostly overlooked comics, but the Museum clearly made an exception here inasmuch as Feininger went on to become an important painter of the early 20th century.

    I presume that “Masters” used so many newspaper pages for the Feininger section because the original art for these strips was unavailable. These pages reminded me of a question raised by the Dahesh Museum’s show “Stories to Tell: Masterworks from the Kelly Collection of American Illustration” earlier this year (see “Comics in Context” #132). Since these illustrators specifically designed their work to be reproduced in magazines and books, it can be argued that the reproduction is the true artwork, and not the original drawing or painting. The same argument could be made about comics.

    Feininger only worked in comics for nine months in 1906 and 1907, creating two strips, The Kin-der-Kids and Wee Willie Winkie’s World. One of the pages with a Wee Willie Winkie strip on display was dated Sunday, September 23, 1906, and there I was at the Newark Museum on Saturday, September 23, 2006, looking at it exactly a century later.

    “Masters of American Comics” is such a large and important exhibition that I cannot hope to do it justice in a single week’s column, so I will continue my review of the show next week.

    LINKS IN THE GREAT CHAIN OF CYBERBEING
    In response to my memorial to the late Mark Gruenwald last week, Peter B. Gillis, once writer of such Marvel series as The Defenders, The Eternals (the unjustly forgotten 1980s revival), The Micronauts and Strikeforce Morituri, has created his own beautifully written an insightful tribute to Mark on his blog. Peter focuses on Mark as a visionary in his approach to Marvel’s fictional universe. If you look further down the section of his blog devoted to comics, you will also find Gillis’s homage to the late, great artist Alex Toth, whom he knew personally. There is also Gillis’s tribute to Charles Schulz, which takes the form of a story about what happened to the lead Peanuts characters when they became adults: it is everything that Dog Sees God, the recent off-Broadway play about the Peanuts characters as teenagers, should have been but wasn’t (see “Comics in Context” #120).

    But don’t just read the sections of Peter Gillis’s blog that are about comics. He also does incisive political commentary and even offers (very) short science fiction stories for your perusal. His blog is one of the smartest and richly, masterfully written blogs I’ve ever come across. Read it and you too will wonder why the comics industry was foolish enough to let him leave the field.

    Former Movie Poop Shoot contributor Scott Tipton has already done just what I have been advocating lately: a thematic analysis of Mark Gruenwald’s body comics stories apart from Squadron Supreme. You can find Tipton’s perceptive survey, titled “Because It’s Right: Ethics and the Work of Mark Gruenwald,” here.

    I’ve written approvingly twice about the Star Wars Fan Film Awards (see “Comics in Context” #5 and #142), so it should not surprise you that I also enjoyed the very similar “Green Screen Challenge” on Comedy Central’s The Colbert Report. In this case fans constructed CGI videos around footage of the noble Stephen Colbert demonstrating his prowess wielding a lightsaber in front of a green screen. Even George Lucas himself joined the competition, as we learned on the October 11, 2006 episode (to be rerun on October 25). But it was Bonnie Rose, a freelancer here at Quick Stop Entertainment, who triumphed, and I suggest you read her memoir of her experience.

    Finally, three cheers for Quick Stop’s Fred Hembeck, whose Cartoon Fred makes his long overdue and dependably amusing return to the pages of Marvel comics in the new Stan Lee Meets Spider-Man one-shot. It’s proof that exile from the House of Ideas need not last forever!

    –Copyright 2006 Peter Sanderson

    Take Me Home Blog #13: Shingles and the American Dream

    Filed under: Production Blogs,Take Me Home Blog — UncaScroogeMcD @ 7:51 pm
    takemehomeheader.jpg

    takemehome2006-10-20samcat2.jpgI SHOULD HAVE SHINGLES BY NOW.
    With ten days until we shoot, I’d like to take this opportunity to give myself a little pat on the back. You see, ordinarily my body would be rejecting such stress, forcing me into the hospital with a number of rare ailments found only in lab rats. Once, as I think I mentioned in an earlier blog, I got shingles while laboring over a screenplay. But not this time. Why? Because I have decided to pretend making a movie is fun.

    MAKING A MOVIE IS FUN.
    Or at least it can be with the right psychotherapist. That is, with the right outlook on this process, you TOO can avoid both a mental and a physical collapse. Example: rather than worry about something as trivial as whether or not you have insurance to cover the $20,000 worth of rented equipment, focus instead on the fact that you’ve already cast your film! OR, rather than worry about how to operate a camera you’ve never held in your life, focus on the fact that your storyboards look very pretty! See? It’s all in how you approach filmmaking. I myself have chosen to approach it with a sparkling delusion.

    TO BOLDLY GO WHERE aww, who the hell am I kidding?
    The one drawback of boldly making a film on your own is that you have to be bold throughout. You can’t get halfway in and pass off the duties to a studio exec. How are you in the process? Have you planned your film? Called your crew? Polished your script, and etched your storyboards? Or are you losing boldness by the pound? If doubt is ever going to creep in, it’s going to happen now.

    FRAILTY, THY NAME IS FILMMAKER
    To share from my own experience, the night before we shot Advantage Hart, I had a minor breakdown (and I say “minor” only to shield my feminine side). We were $6000 over budget for all of our equipment rentals, and facing the likelihood of shutting the picture down. Kate Bosworth and the rest of our talented cast had just left my house after an awkward rehearsal, and my co-writer/co-producer Mike Hobert and I were trying to make sense of our gluttonous budget. With our director Seibenick, our cinematographer Terrence Hayes, Mike and I all huddled in our make-shift office, I remember the idea of calling all 100 people involved to tell them the movie wasn’t happening. Have you ever gone into the dentist’s office for x-rays and they drape that thick, heavy bib over your chest? That’s what it felt like. I’m not ashamed to admit, I think I shed a few tears. “Just tell me we’re going to make a great film.”

    The next morning Mike and I called all of the rental houses and told them we couldn’t pay the price they were asking. In three hours we shaved that $6000 off our budget.

    AS AMERICAN AS APPLE PIE*
    What could be more American than filmmaking? Hollywood gets thrashed by the media for having corrupted our culture, but I think that’s unfounded. Filmmaking is about entrepeneurship; our fervent belief that we can make something out of absolutely nothing. We can make a sound stage look like a space station. We can make Orlando Bloom a Kentuckian. Even more, we can rise out of our social class. We can dream the impossible dream. Against enormous odds. With nothing but a few tools, a singular idea, and the will to see it through.

    *(Apple pie, by the way, is not American. It was invented in medieval times in europe and the recipes were brought over during colonialism. The fact that we’ve stolen and claimed it as our own simply makes it MORE American, doesn’t it?! Like that time we took that land from the Indians. What was that called? Oh yeah: “AMERICA”!!)

    ONWARD!!!
    So run out now and continue this bold pursuit. You have the American Dream to uphold, you see?! And if you have to steal locations… remember apple pie. If you have to steal dialogue from another film… remember apple pie. Should you find yourself in a make-shift office surrounded by your friends, shedding a tear for your dwindling aspirations, remember the soldiers of WWII who, when asked by reporters why they were going to war, often responded: “For mother and apple pie!!!”

    EPILOGUE
    On Sunday, Seibenick, Mike and I are getting together to whip up a film. In one day. Running around Los Angeles. By Monday, we’ll have a finished short. Possibly two. Just like we often did in highschool, when filmmaking was just a couple of kids pretending. Before it became something impractical: a math equation. A headache. When it was still a dream.

    -Sam Jaeger

    jaeger.jpg

    Ken P. D. Snyde-Cast #18: Flyover States

    Filed under: Ken P.D. Snydecast — UncaScroogeMcD @ 6:33 am

    snydecast-header.png

    snydecast-logo2.png

    Adult Swim’s Dana Snyder and FRED’s Ken Plume set out to have a literate conversation between two pals, but inevitably devolve into a verbal, and funny, free-for-all full of bickering, infighting, and the special kind of male bonding that comes from conflict expressed through the podcast medium.

    Actor/comedian/raconteur Dana Snyder, you’re certainly aware, is Aqua Teen Hunger Force’s Master Shake, Squidbillies‘ Granny, Minoriteam’s Dr. Wang, and The Venture Bros.‘ Alchemist. Available for weddings and bar mitzvahs (bat availability pending), you can keep tabs on him via his website, www.eyeofthesnyder.com.

    Ken Plume is the editor-in-chief here at FRED. He is a friend of Dana’s, as well as his arch-nemesis.

    VISIT THE SNYDECAST EXPERIENCE

    linesm.gif

    KEN P.D. SNYDECAST #18: Flyover States – [adult swim]’s Dana Snyder and Ken Plume’s weekly chat podcast returns with a special guest, as Dana is trapped in the midwest with his good buddy Chip Duford in this special 2-part episode.

    [CONTENT WARNING]: This podcast may contain some foul language and horribly off-color jokes. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

    DOWNLOAD: (right click to save)
    Episode #18 Part 1 (MP3 format)

    [audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/snydecast/ken_p_d_snyde_cast-18pt1.mp3]

    Episode #18 Part 2 (MP3 format)

    [audio:http://traffic.libsyn.com/snydecast/ken_p_d_snyde_cast-18pt2.mp3]

    SUBSCRIBE
    Subscribe to this Podcast via iTunes

    Got something to say? E-mail Dana & Ken at the Snydecast mailbag.

    line.gif

    CLICK HERE FOR THE SNYDECAST ARCHIVES

    line.gif

    ##

    Quick Stop Thingamabobs: 10/20/2006

    Filed under: Columns,Thingamabobs — UncaScroogeMcD @ 6:30 am
    thingamabobs.jpg

    The web. It’s a big place, full of plenty of distractions ““ some funny, some informative, some ludicrous, some disturbing, some inane, some profound. Each and every weekday, we present links to a few of our favorite finds”¦

    ————————————————

    • Comedy impresarios Kasper-Hauser have a weekly podcast. Check it out. Now. (Thingamabob)
    • Take a tour of Jay Leno’s garage, and contemplate just how many vehicles one man can own? (Thingamabob)
    • Now THIS is how to time a jump just right (Thingamabob)
    • Before Jay Ward produced the adventures of Rocky & Bullwinkle, he produced the very first cartoon for the boob tube, Crusader Rabbit. (Thingamabob)
    • Patrick Owsley produces the kind of art I’d like to hang on my wall… (Thingamabob)

    Have a THINGAMABOB? Send it in!

    ##

    Addicted To Bad: No, Joe!

    Filed under: Addicted to Bad,Columns — UncaScroogeMcD @ 6:23 am

    addictedtobad.jpg

    Let me see if I’ve got this straight: GI Joe is an elite military task force tasked with stopping COBRA, a nefarious terrorist organization who spend all their time attacking GI Joe. Viewed from this perspective, this is completely, inexplicably irrational, making it perhaps the most brilliant satire of military history ever to appear on sPoster1yndicated TV, save for “Charles in Charge.” More likely, though, is that the whole thing is just an elaborate ruse by the armed forces aimed at keeping their most inept recruits busy with their most incompetent foe while the grown-ups get on with the real work of defending the country. That would go a long way to explaining their piss-poor marksmanship, not to mention how William “The Refrigerator” Perry wound up in their ranks.

    Still, to their credit, the Joes clearly embrace their diversity. Anyone can be a Joe, provided he isn’t like anyone else on the squad. The practical upshot of this is that they only have one guy capable of doing each job: One pilot, one gunner, one… ninja. (If I ran the military, every battalion would have at least one ninja.) The One Guy Policy either incredibly efficient and optimistic, or the stupidest strategy ever. COBRA may have been inept and ass-backwards, but at least they had a little built-in redundancy. Not to mention really cool headgear. And a floating fortress of death! For a group with no discernible goals or income, they do all right for themselves. Yep, if it weren’t for the whole yelling-their-name-when-they-attack thing, I would totally join COBRA.

    At least I would have before GI JOE: THE MOVIE, when we found out that COBRA were really just a front for Cobra-la, an ancient snake cult that lives in the Himalayas. Which makes about as much sense as a bunch of Saharan tribesmen worshipping polar bears, but whatever. Yes, to recap, COBRA, the feared international terrorist army, are being secretly manipulated by an ancient race of reptilians who live in one of the coldest climates on earth. It makes so much sense that I think we should demand that the government send ridiculously expensive expeditions into northern India just to ensure that there aren’t any snake cults lurking there.

    Apparently the cultists decided that the mid-80s was finally the right time to emerge from the mountains, perhaps because their outfits had finally come back into fashion. More likely, however, they were looking to turn the human race into drooling, mindless animals, and they figured that “Battle of the Network Stars” had already done most of the work for them. To finish off the other half, they needed to seize control of the transmitter for (and BETthis is true) something called BET, which GI Joe is testing out at the start of the film. How exactly Black Entertainment Television figures into world domination is never made explicitly clear, but it’s a safe bet that it involves the mobilization of several hundred Wayanses and possibly a WHITE GIRLS sequel.

    Apparently, with the aid of BET, the Cobra-lalians will release spores into the atmosphere. Fortunately for us, since they’re using the COBRA army, we know there’s little chance they will succeed. Unfortunately for us, the Army let GI Joe guard the BET thing, which means there’s a good chance that it will get captured. Apparently for the Joes, guarding a priceless piece of equipment means one or two guys, tops. Maybe if they let themselves have, I don’t know, more than one MP or something. Hell, he doesn’t even have to be a full-timer. Get yourselves a temp, guys, and save on the benefits.

    Instead, they task Duke’s mildly retarded brother Falcon with watching the transmitter, which he promptly screws up by bringing an in-disguise COBRA operative in to show it off. Maybe I’m out of touch, but are women really that turned on by giant military vehicles tGo Joehese days? Somebody needs to tell Falcon about tequila shooters. They’re easier to get your hands on, and that way it’s two people at most who are likely to end up brain damaged, not the entire human race. But we all know how little brothers are…

    So the BET thing gets stolen, and one of the COBRA bigwigs escapes from the brig, all because Duke was too busy to take his little brother out and get him laid. Sad, really. So what happens to the little runt for crippling the war effort and possibly dooming the entire race to Death by Wayans? Military prison until he’s 80? A severe beating from his fellow Joes? No, he’s sent for more training, which probably should have happened before they let him guard priceless equipment.

    In the end, Falcon redeems himself by infiltrating the Cobra-la headquarters and shutting off BET, probably right before “Martin” came on, for which we should all be grateful. COBRA, it seems, will have to live without Sheneneh for one day more.

    Alas, the next day, Destro had digital cable installed, which not only had BET but also TV Land and three channels of MTV. I guess you can’t win ’em all.

    Weekend Shopping Guide 10/20/06: Under the Influence

    Filed under: Shopping Guides — UncaScroogeMcD @ 4:35 am

    weekendshopping.jpg

    The weekend’s here. You’ve just been paid, and it’s burning a hole in your pocket. What’s a pop culture geek to do? In hopes of steering you in the right direction to blow some of that hard-earned cash, it’s time for the Quick Stop Weekend Shopping Guide – your spotlight on the things you didn’t even know you wanted…

    While most know her from her role as Jerri Blank on Comedy Central’s cult hit Strangers With Candy – or her numerous guest appearances on David Letterman and Sex and the City – friends and family know Amy Sedaris as a hostess par excellence, famed for her parties and dinners, and her fantastic home-cooked cuisine. Seeing the simple act of entertaining guests as an art quickly atrophying in this fast-paced digital age, she’s crafted the ultimate guide to throwing your own shindigs – I Like You: Hospitality Under The Influence (Hachette Book Group, $27.99 SRP). Although written with the same wit and delightfully bent perspective that informs her comedy, the book should in no way be taken as a “joke cookbook” – it’s a legitimate presentation of party suggestions (leave marbles in your medicine chest to signal the telltale sound of a nosy guest), hints (like the fact that doing dishes after a party can be a cathartic exercise), recipes (I can’t wait to try her “Crosscut Stump Stew”), and crafts (plastic googly eyes make anything fun) sure to inspire even the most slothlike of hosts and hostesses to send off some invites, fill up the ice tub, fire up the oven, and lay out the welcome mat. An audiobook version read by Sedaris and featuring additional recipes is also available (Hachette, $29.99 SRP).

    After seeing the ads for Big Love (HBO, Not Rated, DVD-$99.98 SRP) in the build-up to its premiere, I was completely nonplussed. Why would I want to watch a drama about an unconventional American family – members of a religious cult who believe in polygamy. Well, I tried to resist watching it, but it stars Bill Paxton as the patriarch of the Henrickson clan – which includes 3 wives (Jeanne Tripplehorn, Chloe Sevigny, & Ginnifer Goodwin) and a passel of kids – who owns a thriving home improvement center in suburban Salt Lake City. I did wind up watching the premiere, and like The Sopranos before it, found that instead of clichés, what I got instead was a nuanced drama filled with the kind of realistic human comedy that shows like Desperate Housewives try desperately to manufacture. And it’s got Bill Paxton. The 5-disc box set contains all 12 first season episodes, plus a pair of audio commentaries and a behind-the-scenes look at the credit sequence.

    Of all the regional children’s presenters who rose to national prominence in the 50’s & 60’s, once of the most beloved – and delightfully anarchic – was Soupy Sales. From the originator of the infamous “take a dollar out of your parents wallet and send it in” gag to the endless pie fights, Soupy was a true TV legend. Thankfully, his hijinks have wound their way to DVD via a pair of releases – the 3-disc The Soupy Sales Collection: The Whole Gang Is Here (Morada Vision, Not Rated, DVD-$19.98 SRP) and Soupy Sales: In Living Black & White (Morada Vision, Not Rated, DVD-$14.98 SRP). The former contains Sales’ later color work, which was aimed towards adults, while the Black & White disc features the classic kiddie shows that marked a generation of kids.

    As Kevin Costner has his Dances With Wolves, Warren Beatty also has a masterpiece of a film on his résumé – and that film is Reds (Paramount, Rated PG, DVD-$19.99 SRP). Based on a true story, Beatty stars as the American communist, journalist, and activist John Reed, whose love affair with writer/feminist Louise Bryant (Diane Keaton) plays out as the titanic events of the Russian Revolution unfold around them. It’s an incredibly epic tale, and much-deserving of this 2-disc 25th anniversary edition, featuring 7 in-depth featurettes charting the making-of the film, as well as the events that inspired it.

    If the first season of Wonder Showzen was a surreal experiment that somehow worked comedically, the second season (Paramount, Not Rated, DVD-$26.99 SRP) was a confident, brutal, hilarious parody of those classic PBS kiddie shows that filled the youthful minds of the children of the 70’s and 80’s (I weep for the pop culture deficit of modern kids). The 2-disc set features all 8 episodes, plus a pair of commentaries, outtakes, and exclusive Beat Kids featurette, games & time wasters, and outtakes.

    Even though Eric has presented Donna with a ring, does that mean she’ll actually say yes? And will Jackie’s secret relationship with Hyde escape Kelso’s notice? Or is he too preoccupied with the idea of becoming a cop after the high school job fair? And can Fez find love at the DMV? Granted, if you watched the fifth season of That 70’s Show (Fox, Not Rated, DVD-$49.98 SRP) when it aired, you know the answers to all these questions. The 4-disc set features all 25 episodes, plus promo spots, a 70’s flashback with Wilmer Valderrama and Danny Masterson, and a 5-minute retrospective of the season.

    The Master of Suspense returns with 39 more classic episodes in the 2nd season of Alfred Hitchcock Presents (Universal, Not Rated, DVD-$39.98 SRP). The 5-discs are packed chock full of guest stars, including Vic Morrow, Rip Torn, Jessica Tandy, Hume Cronyn, and many more. Have a “Good evening…” indeed.

    If you want to support a pair of fantastic New Orleans charities – the Louisiana Children’s Museum & Habitat For Humanity’s Musician’s Village Project in New Orleans- and add some wonderful music to your collection, pick up New Orleans Playground & New Orleans Christmas (Putumayo World Music, $15.98 SRP each), a pair of discs featuring some legendary luminaries from the Crescent City, including Dr. John (whose take on “Row Row Your Boat” is memorable, to say the least), The Meters, Buckwheat Zydeco, Fats Domino, Clarence “Frogman” Henry, and many more.

    When the somewhat dim, disconnected president of the United States (Dennis Quaid) decides to reconnect with the public by getting involved in the live finale of the hugely popular network reality show American Dreamz (Universal, Rated PG-13, DVD-$29.98 SRP). Imagine an even more tacky and wildly popular version of American Idol, where the finalists are an opportunistic middle American sweetheart (Mandy Moore) and a naïve, showtunes-loving young Arab boy – who just may inadvertently cause the night to completely derail in the most unwanted kind of fireworks you can imagine. The flick is actually a very sly satire (I’ll leave the interpretations up to you) and an enjoyable night in front of the TV. The DVD features an audio commentary, deleted scenes, and a pair of behind-the-scenes featurettes.

    Take an obscure Japanese game show from the early 90’s that placed teams of contestants in unbelievably awkward and dangerous stunts, dub over it with an incredibly funny commentary from your “hosts” Vic Romano and Kenny Blankenship (not to mention field marshal Captain Tanneal and sideline reporter Guy LaDouche) and you have the sublimely brilliant MXC: Most Extreme Elimination Challenge (Magnolia, Not Rated, DVD-$34.98 SRP). This 2-disc set features all 13 first season episodes, plus select episode commentary, the original sales presentation for the show, a reel of the most painful eliminations, and even an episode of the show in its original Japanese form (known as Takeshi’s Castle).

    In terms of British sitcoms, the long-running My Family is an anomaly. Unlike most Britcoms, which are usually written by a single writer or a writing duo, My Family had an American-style writing staff headed up by former Larry Sanders and Seinfeld exec producer Fred Barron. It certainly brings a slightly different flavor to this family comedy about a pair of hapless but loving parents (Robert Lindsay & Zoe Wannamaker) at the mercy of their children. Check out the complete first and second seasons (BBC, Not Rated, DVD-$19.98 SRP each) and see if you notice the difference a Yank makes.

    Her Fox sitcom never really knew how to properly utilize Wanda Sykes. When you check out her caustically hilarious stand-up special, Wanda Sykes: Sick & Tired (Image, Not Rated, DVD-$19.99 SRP), you’ll understand why no mainstream network could be capable of using her correctly, and why she’s the perfect fit for things like her frequent guest appearances on Larry David’s Curb Your Enthusiasm. The DVD features 15 minutes of additional footage, plus an audience Q&A and a radio interview.

    A series of unfortunate events needs an equally gothic soundtrack, and Stephen Merritt’s The Tragic Treasury: Songs From A Series Of Unfortunate Events (Nonesuch, $18.98 SRP) is exactly that, with songs from each of the 13 books comprising Lemony Snicket’s chronicle of the trials and tribulations of the Baudelaire orphans.

    Never really a fan of the CSI franchise, I have found that whenever I run across an episode of CSI: New York, I’ll find myself drawn in – not by the increasingly overplayed procedural aspects, but by star Gary Sinise as Detective Mac Taylor, whose forensics team faces a bit of a shake-up in the show’s sophomore season, plus a crossover with David Caruso’s Miami contingent. The 6-disc complete second season (Paramount, Not Rated, DVD-$64.99 SRP) features audio commentaries on 5 episodes, and 5 behind-the-scenes featurettes.

    Loaded with gore and a low-budget energy, Feast (Dimension, Not Rated, DVD-$29.99 SRP) is the winner of the last Project Greenlight, which found John Gulager at the helm of a horror film. The final product should make many Fango fans happy, as it has many of the elements of the genre’s heyday. The unrated DVD features deleted scenes, outtakes, commentary, a making-of featurette, and a look at the practical effects.

    Peta Wilson’s turn as the sexy secret agent codenamed Josephine wraps up in the fifth and final season of La Femme Nikita (Warner Bros., Not Rated, DVD-$39.98 SRP), featuring the resolution of her long-standing quest to find out exactly why she was chosen for her most dangerous position within the spy network Section. The 3-disc set features all 8 episodes, plus deleted scenes, a behind-the-scenes featurette, and an internet teaser by director Jon Cassar.

    Like death with a typewriter, Angela Lansbury’s crime-solving novelist Jessica Fletcher returns in the complete fourth season of Murder, She Wrote (Universal, Not Rated, DVD-$49.98 SRP). Joining her these season (and nimbly avoiding the scythe) is Tom Bosley – gotta love Tom Bosley. These season also features one of my favorite Fletcher death run, with guest star Frank Gorshin. The 5-disc set features all 22 episodes, plus a bonus episode from season 5 (“Snow White, Blood Red”).

    Comfortable that they’ve become a long-running supernatural soap that has made it past cast changes and behind-the-scenes dust-ups, the sixth season of Charmed (Paramount, Not Rated, DVD-$49.99 SRP) was one of wild abandon. Our witchy trio become Valkyries to take on an island full of Amazons, travel through time (via go-go power), fight a spider-demon, and even handily handle Phoebe becoming a genie. As with previous sets, there are still no bonus features – unless they require a magic key to find them which, sadly, I do not possess.

    In the mood for a trashy horror flick to pass a chilly October evening? Why not try Rest Stop (Warner Bros., Not Rated, DVD-$24.98 SRP), a gorefest about pretty people making an ill-fated stop along the road. Bonus features include alternate endings, galleries, and a trailer.

    So there you have it… my humble suggestions for what to watch, listen to, play with, or waste money on this coming weekend. See ya next week…

    ##

    Melonpool Quickcast #18: Mayberry Meets Steve Rude

    Filed under: Melonpool Quickcast — admin @ 3:26 am
    melonpool2.gif

    -By Steve Troop

    Based on Steve Troop’s classic webcomic of the same name, the Melonpool Quickcast features puppet versions of Troop’s alien cast, who are desperately trying to make heads or tails out of Earth culture.

    Steve Rude

    Mayberry interviews Eisner Award winning artist and all-around nice guy Steve Rude at the San Diego Comic-Con.

    Don’t forget to comment on this and other Melonpool Quickcasts over at the official Melonpool Quickcast Forum!

    Melonpool Quickcast #18: Mayberry meets Steve Rude:

    • Large (560 x 420 – QuickTime – 22.9 MB)
    • Small (320 x 240 – QuickTime – 10.2 MB)

    Nocturnal Admissions: DVD Review, CSI: NY: Season Two

    Filed under: Columns,Nocturnal Admissions — UncaScroogeMcD @ 3:24 am
    nocturnalheader5.gif

    CSI is a well-oiled machine. Week after week the industrious CSI production company manufactures three hours of effective, highly polished crime shows that have the production values of movies and the ultimately reassuring tones of traditional television, while fitting into the CBS network’s inclination toward patriotic and conservative crime shows. With its blend of the gross and the nobly sentimental, the CSI shows follow familiar tropes in popular contemporary network shows, in which criminals are accorded little sympathy (we usually know who “did it” quite early in the hour because the “perp” is flagged with unpleasant personal characteristics), and so are the victims, with the noble officers of the CSIs toiling on with dignity but little public or familial recognition. Occasionally, though, even the CSIs are tempted to the dark side. Everyone ultimately is guilty.

    The first of the batch, CSI: Crime Scene Investigations blended the glitz and glamour of Las Vegas with Sherlockian puzzles solved via clever twists. No 2 in the series is set in Miami, and is constructed around worship of David Caruso’s emotionally stoic and noble character. But show three, set in New York, has been a show in crisis. Now out on DVD (Paramount, October 17th, 2006, seven discs for $65.95), season two charts its makers attempts to shift it back to the center from its out edges of big apple sass and ethnicity.
    BoxCSI: NY was forged in the wake of 911, with its central character Mac Taylor (Gary Sinise) tortured by the fact that his wife died in the terrorist attacks. This first season was considered dark, with its heroes dwelling in a dank, dark office space, and most of its cast being very New York and angry and accented. Apparently word came from the top that to go forward the series must “lighten up,” literally. As season two begins the medicals are moving upstairs to glass walled open offices, and there is also some cast housekeeping. This is the season in which Vanessa Ferlito’s Detective Aiden Burn is fired and replaced by Detective Lindsay Monroe (Anna Belknap), a wholesome girl from Montana who has some of the aspect of Pam from The Office. Later, Aiden dies violently. Also added is Hill Harper as Dr. Sheldon Hawkes. CBS shows ideally like to have both a male brainiac and a kooky female tech person, and Hawkes represents the addition of the brainiac.

    Belknap

    CSI: NY does share some features with the other two CSIs. One is a recurrent villain, in this case one D. J. Pratt (Chad Williams), a serial rapist who was finally put away (at least for now) in the wake of Aiden’s death. The CSI team also investigates such supposedly peculiarly NY settings as cuddle parties, a doll hospital, a death by cross bow, a building climber’s fall, a quasi-terrorist bombing, an a murder of a roller derby star. In one episode, an Astor is murdered (can they do that?). There is also an in joke, when Sinise finds a suspect in line at an audition for a production of Of Mice and Men, which Sinise starred in on stage and later adapted to the screen.

    Gary Sinise

    The heart of the show is Sinise’s Taylor, who is an ex-military man with some remaining sympathy for the service and who is also a jazz base guitarist on his off nights. Sinise has what sounds like a great midwestern drawl, and quiet authority, the reverse of Caruso, more in the Petersen mode. Fortunately, CSI:NY spares us too much in the way of soap opera, although operating on the theory that no series character may ever be thoroughly happy, Melina Kanakaredes’s Detective Stella Bonasera, whose character showed hints of a romance, must end up discovering that he is a creep and kills him in self defense. The CSIs aren’t entirely uniform, but it would be interesting to add a fourth called something like CSI: Vancouver, showing a different nation’s unique approaches to crime solving.

    Zuiker

    All 24 episodes of season two on are hand, including one that was the part two of a particularly bloody story that began in Miami. Transfers, sound are excellent.
    Five episodes enjoy straightforward audio commentaries with the likes of David Von Ancken, editor Bill Zabala, Scott Lautanen, writer Zachary Reiter, creator Anthony E. Zuiker, Elizabeth Devine, Duane Clark, producer Peter M. Lenkov, and director James Whitmore Jr. Scattered across the discs are several short making ofs, a general one on the series, “Top of the Heap: The Cast and Crew Look at Season 2”, followed by “Rolling with Jamalot,” about the episode about the roller derby, “A New Look from the 35th Floor” a tour of the new CSI: NY set, a “making of” about the episode “Heroes” which is one of the best, and “Season 2 Ends with a Bang,” about the finale.

    NY title
    « Newer Posts — Older Posts »

    Powered by WordPress