FRED Entertainment

February 5, 2008

Win DAMAGES: SEASON 1 on DVD!

Filed under: Contests — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:02 am

We’re giving away, in conjunction with Sony Pictures Home Entertainment, three (3) copies of DAMAGES: SEASON ONE on DVD.

Contest ends at midnight EST on Tuesday, February 12th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of Quick Stop Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Tuesday, February 12th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

Quick Stop Thingamabobs: 2/5/2008

Filed under: Columns,Thingamabobs — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:01 am

thingamabobs.jpg

The web. It’s a big place, full of plenty of distractions ““ some funny, some informative, some ludicrous, some disturbing, some inane, some profound. Each and every weekday, we present links to a few of our favorite finds”¦

————————————————

  • Today, let’s do an episode of the Graham Norton Show, Part 1… (Thingamabob)

February 4, 2008

Game On! 2-4-2008: Holiday Hangover

Filed under: Game On! — admin @ 12:04 am

gameon.jpg

Holy crap. I have a column, don’t I? Wow.

Well, after my daring escape from the Gaming Interment Camp for the Insane (aka Holiday Gaming Retail) I’m finally back. Since that escapade took up MUCH more time than I anticipated, I have a whole slew of capsule-ized reviews, just so we can look back real quick on what came out at the end of the year, before we head into the New Year (a month late) with new fun stuff.

2007 saw many promises unfulfilled here in Game On! The Gaming News”¦never came but a few times. The podcasts were infrequent due to my work schedule (there still remains one that was shot but never finished”¦damn holidays) and the reviews grew fewer and fewer. This year”¦well, no promises, but I will say that I’m going to try my damnedest to stay on track. Last year was my first year in my new position at my day job, and my column suffered because of it. I apologize to you all, my loyal readers, and hope I can win you all (and some new ones) back this year.

Enough fluff, let’s get it going. So what happened at the end of last year?

gameon2008-02-04-01.jpgSUPER MARIO GALAXY ““ WII

We saw Mario’s first foray into platforming gaming in a LONG time with GALAXY’s release in November. Everything that has been hyped about this title is true: it’s beautiful, it’s fun, and it’s amazing in every way. The Wii’s controls are intuitive and easy, and you’ll have Mario flying through the universe, shooting star gems and rescuing the Princess like an old pro once again. The level design and quest for stars is addictive as ever, and the integration of the new suits (Bee suit, Boo suit, Ice) are just as fantastic as the fire flower was in it’s day. While some of the motion control is still lacking (I hate those damn manta ray levels) it still doesn’t get any better than a full form Mario adventure.

gameon2008-02-04-02.jpgASSASSIN’S CREED ““ XBOX 360, PS3

Take equal elements of HITMAN and SPLINTER CELL’s stealth, the acrobatics of the PRINCE OF PERSIA series, and combine it with GRAND THEFT AUTO’s free roaming open world sandbox, set it in the Third Crusade, and you’d be pretty close to what to expect from ASSASSIN’S CREED. Shunned assassin Altair must redeem himself in the guild by upholding the creed of not killing innocents and bringing down the Templars and all associated with their plans. Gaining information for each missions main kill is fun, but does often get repetitive (but honestly, so did GTAIII the first time you played it too) as you eavesdrop, pickpocket, take out spies and”¦collect flags(?) on your way towards the truth. The stuff in between the missions may confuse some, but in the bigger picture of the game (which I won’t spoil here) it all makes sense in the end”¦and brings up good sequel excuses. And besides, nothing beats taking out a guard with a throwing knife, taking a running dive off a castle precipice, and landing safely in a bale of hay 60 feet below. And nothing looks better than doing it, either.

gameon2008-02-04-03.jpgSOULCALIBUR LEGENDS ““ WII

What should have been a cool adventure bridging the gap between SOUL EDGE and the first SOUL CALIBUR game, SOULCALIBUR LEGENDS (not sure why that’s all one word now) just ends up being a decent mini game. Much like THE DEMON WITHIN games on the TEKKEN discs, this is just repetitive sword swinging. Walk into a room, fail wildly with the Wii-mote, finish off the foes, continue, and repeat. The bland cut-scenes and sub-par voice work don’t lend much to a better score, either, but at least Floyd from TALES OF SYMPHONIA has a cameo as a selectable character. The Wii’s controls are good and precise, but not precise enough to make this sword adventure work as well as you’d want.

gameon2008-02-04-04.jpgRESIDENT EVIL: UMBRELLA CHRONICLES and GHOST SQUAD ““ WII

A few folks aren’t as thrilled about the Wii Zapper peripheral as I am. I love the thing, but that may be because I love light gun games. Thankfully, the developers of the titles that utilize the Wii-mote and Nunchuck cradle had the foresight to integrate a Zapper setting in the control set up, otherwise, these wouldn’t get as high a grade as they do.

The Zapper’s Tommy gun like shape is perfect for slaying zombies, and the condensed versions of RE 0, 1 and 3 fit perfectly into the “on rails” arcade motif. The extra UMBRELLA missions add some much-needed story to fill in plot holes and satiate fan service before the next big title in the series is released.

GHOST SQUAD is a much shorter adventure, easily beaten in about an hour and a half. It’s simply a port of the arcade game, and while it may not seem like much, multiple play throughs reveal multiple paths to the end mission, which also unlock costumes, multiplayer modes, and weapons. Sure, SEGA could have added more missions (which would have been preferable) but at $30 it’s not too much for a quick evening with friends.

gameon2008-02-04-05.jpgBLACKSITE: AREA 51 and CLIVE BARKER’S JERICHO ““ XBOX 360, PS3

Now here are two titles that could have been exciting, but their end products truly left lacking. In BLACKSITE’s case, it was a bland story and some average shooter action that brought it down. For a game with AREA 51 it would have been cool if there were actual ALIENS in the game, not just genetically enhanced science experiments. The multiplayer had some fun moments, but for the most part, it’s an rental at best, and beaten in about 6 hours. It’s pretty bad for your game when one of the game’s DVELEOPERS badmouths it right after release.

JERICHO on the other hand, starts with a great concept, but it’s end execution just falters and never quite gets back up. As a crack team of paranormal whos-its, each with their own unique powers, it had the whole “bad ass squad tactic” kind of feel for it. Sadly, when you’re spending more time healing your AI teammates than shooting the visceral goonies and ghoulies that are ripping you to shreds, well”¦that’s just badly done. It looks cool and creepy enough, but I was more scared of the control and my team dying than I was of the guy actually out for our faces.

gameon2008-02-04-07.jpgTHE ORANGE BOX ““ XBOX 360, PS3, PC

Okay, we all know that HALF-LIFE 2 was one of the greatest (if not THE greatest) story driven FPS’ out there. If you missed it before, or even if you didn’t, you owe it to yourself to pick up this collection. Featuring HALF-LIFE 2, as well as the follow up EPISODE ONE and TWO, there’s enough story to satiate any shooter fan of sci-fi and awesomeness. But the goodies don’t end there. There’s also the brain bending puzzles of PORTAL, reason enough to spend the $60. Despite it’s brevity (you can beat the main PORTAL game in about 2 and a half hours) its brilliance from start to finish is palpable. The game is one of the creepiest yet funniest adventures alone in a while, and the puzzles are among the best ever created. For anything. Top it all off with the online TEAM FORTRESS 2 and you have five games for the price of one that is heavy on the value side of the menu. From its Pixar-like graphics to its team play and 9 diverse character classes, this is enough to keep any shooter fan happy five times over. Buy it now. Why haven’t you yet?

gameon2008-02-04-06.jpgROCK BAND (PS3, XBOX 360, PS2) and GUITAR HERO III (XBOX 360, PS2, PS3, WII)

Well, I had a podcast all ready to showcase the awesomeness of these two games, but”¦well, I won’t say you’ll NEVER see it, but it’s been delayed a bit. In the meantime, however, capsule reviews.

ROCK BAND is, simply, the greatest party game ever invented. From the GUITAR HERO inspired guitar and bass, to the KARAOKE REVOLUTION style vocals, to the new and difficult drums, everything works so well for this rhythm game. We’re used to guitars, sure, but throwing in other instruments to the mix gets everyone involved. Miss a solo, fuck up a riff, and you’ll be screaming at each other like a real band”¦and loving it. The setlist may not seem too large at first, but with weekly downloads since launch, there’s more than enough songs to get you going. Don’t know the lyrics to a song, can’t play the rhythm, on Rush’s “TOM SAWYER”? Switch it out”¦its Band World Tour mode will have everyone taking up new instruments while trying to win fans and world domination. The drums are the best part, though some gamers will still have trouble using both their hands AND Feet at the same time. But that’s all part of life on the road, baby.

Since the developers of GUITAR HERO went on to make ROCK BAND, the third iteration of the series fell to TONY HAWK developer Neversoft, and they’ve handled it like old pros. The setlist is insanely huge, the co-op story mode opens up even more tracks, and the “boss battles” with Slash and Tom Morello are fun and a neat addition to the dynamic. While I wish there more “legends” to battle, the same fun that we always have with the title is here, and the battle mode (where you try to make your opponent mess up by hitting them with lefty flip, breaking a string, or many other attacks) is just the icing on the cake. I’m still a fan.

Whew. Well, I think that about covers the big ones”¦that I played anyway. I’ll be back soon (I swear!) with some more recent releases, including BURNOUT PARADISE and NO MORE HEROES. Till next time”¦

Win LAKE PLACID 2 on DVD!

Filed under: Contests — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:02 am

We’re giving away, in conjunction with Fox Home Entertainment, five (5) copies of LAKE PLACID 2 on DVD.

Prepare for gory, gruesome action as four 30-foot, bloodthirsty, prehistoric crocodiles terrorize residents of a remote lakefront town in the sequel Lake Placid 2, debuting on DVD January 29, 2008 from Fox Home Entertainment. In an all out battle between man and beast, a local sheriff teams up with a wildlife agent and a big game hunter to kill four bloodthirsty offspring from the first fearsome creatures of the original campy-horror film.

Contest ends at midnight EST on Monday, February 11th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of Quick Stop Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Monday, February 11th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

Quick Stop Thingamabobs: 2/4/2008

Filed under: Columns,Thingamabobs — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:01 am

thingamabobs.jpg

The web. It’s a big place, full of plenty of distractions ““ some funny, some informative, some ludicrous, some disturbing, some inane, some profound. Each and every weekday, we present links to a few of our favorite finds”¦

————————————————

  • ah, Rutles Monday… Kicking off with a little “Get Up And Go”… (Thingamabob)

February 1, 2008

Party Favors: The Story Of A Mock And Roll Band

Filed under: Columns,Joe Corey's Party Favors — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:39 am

partyfavors1.jpg

DETROIT – Augie called on Thursday afternoon to cancel out on attending the Norman Taurog film festival. He didn’t have his usual family emergency excuse which normally meant his ex-girlfriend was drunk and horny. This time he bailed because of band practice.

Never had Augie talked about playing music. This was a surprise. Not only was he in a band, but they had three gigs already lined up. His combo had to get extra tight so they could be impressive at the battle of the bands. He was curious about getting tour t-shirts made since that’s where the money is in the biz. He had big plans for Goldenrod.

I gave him the classic advice to make never sign away their publishing to wannabe managers. That’s how those record weasels rip you off. Pack your own rubbers cause they don’t call them skanks as sign of respect. He laughed. I asked where they’re playing and what time do they go on. It’s always good to support your local music scene. Augie wasn’t sure about the time. He was nervous because the first venue was Playstation 3 and all their gear is X-Box 360. What?

His group wasn’t a true rock band, but four people playing the Rock Band video game. He was bailing on me so he could practice a video game. We’re taking practice. I had to crank out the Allen Iverson: “I mean listen, we’re sitting here talking about practice, not a game, not a game, not a game, but we’re talking about practice.” Augie and three other dweebs were practicing pressing buttons on fake instruments. There would be no blistering solo riffing. They’d be typing. Even Kraftwerk wouldn’t consider this being in a band. Goldenrod didn’t need tour t-shirts, but the duct tape of reality to rip the denial off their eyes.

My old band opened up for the Flaming Lips. While it doesn’t make me a rock star, it does link me to Beverly Hills 90210. When you’re in a group, it’s all about duct tape, 9V batteries and deli trays — Not orange slices and rebooting. We rocked the world with instruments that made noise. We rocked out. This Rock Band seems to be four people playing that old Simon game except they want an audience to cheer them on. And the want adoration not merely because they are amazing at playing a video game, but that they are somehow rockin’ the world like The Strokes. After a little research, it seems that Augie isn’t the first guy with a Rock Band group that wants to sell t-shirts as if they’re the second coming of Super Tramp. There’s tons of faux-bands lurking in the rumpus rooms across America. I haven’t seen this much detachment from reality since Rob & Fab thought they were responsible for Milli Vanilli’s sound. If you want to play Rock Band, go ahead. But don’t act like you’re in a real rock band. Until you wake up in a puddle of vomit on the bathroom floor with a needle stuck in your vein and contemplating suicide, you aren’t in a band.

After playing Super Mario Brothers, I didn’t get business cards declaring myself an Italian Plumber. Did my friends believe that I captured giant gorillas that abduct royalty? Although after catching a severe case of Pac-Man Fever, I was banned from West Roxbury’s Osco Drugstore for tossing an open bottle of Geritol and eating the pills off the floor. Wakkka Wakkka Wakkkka.

If Guitar Hero is a wankfest, than Rock Band is a circle jerk. MTV games ought to include a jumbo jar of mayonnaise in the box. (Ask any former-McDonald’s employee about “special sauce” night.) When will we be overwhelmed with commercials for the latest “cool” fake disease: ADD 2.0? They must market pills to treat Adult Dork Disorder. They could hire Placebo to create the jingle.

A simple test to know if you suffer from ADD 2.0 is to buy the DVD for The King of Kong. If you envy the lives of Billy Mitchell, Brian Kuh, Steve Wiebe or Walter Day, you are afflicted. If you wish you could ignore a child’s plea for an ass wiping to keep Mario leaping over barrels, you have ADD 2.0.

The documentary exposes the ugly world of video arcade high scores. For over 20 years Billy Mitchell held the record for the greatest Donkey Kong game. But then out of a garage in Washington came Steve Wiebe’s score that destroyed Mitchell’s plateau. But nothing is simple as Billy’s longtime pals attempt to discredit Wiebe. They even resort to breaking into his house and taking his Donkey Kong game apart to see if he doctored the parts. Why exactly didn’t they get hauled off by the cops? These people are in their own universe and frighten me.

There’s tons of drama and bitchiness. It’s amazing how these people love to remember a time when hundreds would hover around an arcade to see amazing scores. Most of the kids I know that hung out at the video arcade did it to score smokes from the change guy and practice to be hoodlums. The bonus features on the DVD let us know that Billy Mitchell is not happy with how he came off in the edit. He’s a major prick during the 78 minutes. The scene where he tries to distract Steve’s record attempt by parading his busty wife past the machine is gold. This is the perfect geek out movie if you don’t feel like enduring your pals Rock Band faux show.

They strange news is that The King of Kong is being turned into a fictional movie. Why? Do they not remember what happened when Dogtown and the Z-Boys was dramatically transformed into Lords of Dogtown? How can Hollywood recreate the perfect hair of Billy Mitchell? They’ll cast Josh Brolin as Billy and call it No Country For Old Marios. Or if they go younger with Paul Dano in There Will Be Quarters.

LOST IN TRANSLATION

For the Harvard Square showing of There Will Be Blood, Daniel Day Lewis declares, “I drink your frappe!”

GOOD GAMES

While pretending to be a rock star via a video game is lame, I’m fully supportive of concept that boxing on Wii is a great cardio work out. After knocking out six opponents, I was a dripping ball of sweat. My hosts sent me off to the shower before they would let me sit on the sofa. I’m tempted to get a tattoo on my face to get some Mike Tyson respect.

While it’s not the same as getting your jaw knocked around the ring, my arms were sore from all the punches I gave those cyber pugilists. Next on the “to play” list is the Godzilla game. My claws want to tear apart Tokyo.

NEW SPRING FASHION?

While hanging out with pals and their newborn baby, I’m stuck by the thought: Why don’t they make Onesies in adult sizes? It’s the perfect summer wear. You just snap on your “shirt/shorts” and hit the party circuit with Paris, Sean Combs and Ms. Lohan. Time to call up my man in Hong Kong to get Party Favors back in the fashion industry. In a few months you’ll see Bea Arthur and Ned Beatty shaking their groove things in the Hamptons in their Onesies. Wonder if we can get Mickey Rourke as our spokesmodel?
Marc Jacobs better not steal this idea or I’ll brand an asterisk on his rawhide.

HOW THE GAME ENDS

Not to spoil the finale of The Wire, but I’m predicting the series will end with Baltimore in burning ruins and the only survivors being John Waters and the crew from Ace of Cakes. If Marlo has Chris and Snoop pay a midnight visit to Peter Angelos, he’ll be a hero in Charm City.

DVD SHELF TIME

The writer’s strike has kept the DVD player whirring during prime time. Thankfully there’s plenty of fresh stuff to explore when The Wire, Nip/Tuck and No Reservations isn’t scheduled.

This American Life is further proof that Showtime is beating HBO in developing exciting new shows. This is a video version of the NPR show hosted by Ira Glass. Each of the six episodes on This American Life: Season One‘s DVD focuses on various life stories. This the smoothest transition from radio to TV since Jack Benny went from aural to visual. Glass takes his desk into strange terrain in order to set the mood. It’s like how John Cleese opened Monty Python’s Flying Circus. The visual element of the show is top notch. These are more than Real People reports. Even though most of the stories are about people, my favorite two are about animals. One deals with a prized bull that was cloned. Turns out that the “son” might look like his dad, but he doesn’t share the same temperament. There’s a dramatic rush to the hospital when things go extremely wrong. The second best segment has a camera crew visit a modern hog farm. This had even me a bit disgusted at what science has wrought. Not that I’m giving up pork, but I now appreciate devouring mud raised pigs. This American Life: Season One is only available at Borders bookstores. Which makes sense since people who listen to the radio show probably read books.

Family Ties: The Third Season is best known as that period when Michael J. Fox was pulling double duty as Alex P. Keaton by day and Marty McFly at night. Luckily the show was shot on videotape so you can’t see his bleary eyes from his hours on Back the Future. This season provides the surprise of a baby on the way. Most of the season features the swelling Meredith Baxter Birney along with her popping out Andrew Keaton. This would be the final season for Tina Yothers to play the cute youngest child. Meredith looks extra sexy when she goes nuts at an Atlantic City casino.

Walker Texas Ranger: The Fourth Season reminds us what justice will look like when Mike Huckabee wins the presidential election. Chuck Norris will become the Secretary of Law and Order and Asswaxing in 2008. This season he goes undercover in “El Coyote” to stop illegal immigration. He snuffs out the drug trade in “Deep Cover.” Walker even deals with underbelly of high school athletics on “Point After.” This isn’t merely a TV show, this boxset is Chuck Norris’ vision for America. He’s dishing out his credentials with ever round house kick. Besides national issues, “The Avenger” has major buttkicking when the brother of an illegal arms deal sends an army of martial artists after Norris. As long as one of them isn’t Bruce Lee, how dare they think they can stop Walker!

Oswald’s Ghost is an investigation of JFK’s assassin from PBS’s American Experience series. For those who are new to the subject of Kennedy conspiracy theories, this is a concise and informative documentary. They dug up plenty of vintage footage to give a sense of what it was like as the presidential motorcade cruised through Dallas. There’s plenty of time spent exploring the cottage industry that has sprung up to exploit the various conspiracy theories. Too many people think that either Oswald was part of a group or a major patsy. The late Norman Mailer explains why he thinks that Oswald was the solo shooter, but couldn’t admit to his crime when he was abducted. Oswald’s Ghost debunks Oliver Stone’s JFK by point out Jimmy Garrison’s codecracking skills.

If you’re looking for a great series from the ’80s, Sledge Hammer! is perfect for Night Owl viewing. The show is about a cop who think Dirty Harry was a training film. David Rasche is hilarious as Sledge Hammer when he has tender moments with his .44 Magnum. Even though it was stuck against Miami Vice and Dallas, Sledge Hammer! lasted two years which is more than Police Squad. Both seasons are out on DVD. If you hunt around, you can often find them as part of a buy one get one free deal.

For hockey fans, I recommend The Rocket (Palm Pictures), a biopic about the great Montreal Canadians player Maurice “The Rocket Richard.” The film has an amazing cold feeling to the images. You might want to break out a sweater and a couple wool blankets before you hit play on the DVD. I almost got frost bite during the outdoor hockey rink action. Roy Dupuis brings out the beauty and brutality in Richard’s game. The Rocket was old school hockey in his ability to take control of the game with amazing stick play and grace on blades. Plus he could drop his gloves and beat the crap out of anyone. Imagine Wayne Gretzky with a right hook. Richard didn’t need a private enforcer. The ratings explanation warns of “historic smoking throughout.” Does this mean soon we’ll have people making money as “historical smoking consultants” on films?

GORILLA FOR SALE

Allan Melvin recently transferred into syndication heaven. While most of the world remembers him as Sam the Butcher (brother of Abdullah the Butcher), around the Party Favors World Headquarters, Melvin is beloved as the voice of Magilla Gorilla. He was also the voice of Drooper on the Banana Splits. His was great on military comedies. He was part of Sgt. Bilko’s crew and Sgt. Carter’s nemesis on Gomer Pyle, U.S.M.C. We’ll think of Melvin every time we put a T-Bone on the grill. Why wasn’t he honored by the Kennedy Center?

Also it saddens us that Suzanne Pleshette won’t be greeting us at the door of a Chicago apartment. Pleshette seemed like the kinda woman that had a fun, saucy streak. Hopefully the folks at Fox will release the final two seasons The Bob Newhart Show. Her legacy must be preserved.

OOH THAT CHIN HAIR

Is Britney’s new scummy man, Adnan Ghalib, going to make the Brazilian wax popular as the new beard style? Are all the cool kids growing ’em? If Adnan stood on his head and spoke, you’d think he was auditioning to be a new Vivid girl. After watching previews of Adnan’s Entertainment Tonight exclusive interview, there’s no need to discuss “What’s Britney thinking?” How can we talk brain power with a woman who has been out thought by KFed? It’s a miracle she can get the chips out of a can of Pringles.

Now that the new campaign slogan is “Your Vegas Is Showing,” you really should get a fresh waxing before flying into Nevada.

AMERICAN ROLES FOR AMERICANS?

Are we out of American actors for TV shows? It was bad enough when all those Canadians snuck onto the screen in the 20th century. We thought Lorne Greene and Michael J. Fox were like us, but they eventually showed their 55 yard line loyalty. We ultimately accepted them since Canada is the 51st state. But now we’re being overwhelmed with too many network shows that have folks from across the ocean pretending to be us. With Eli Stone on ABC, everyone in Trainspotting now has a network deal. Even the mechanical baby that walked on the ceiling has a CW series in development.

Are we supposed to believe that the latest batch of English dramas star the cast of American History X?

This is a national emergency. The Department of Education needs to go into overdrive to get acting schools to produce a finer grade of native thespian. We once put an American on the moon, can we at least get true a American back on the dial at 8 p.m.?

TROJAN TROUBLE

According to my Magic-8 Ball, the USC Trojans will be hit with major penalties this summer thanks to Reggie Bush’s time as a student-athlete-ATM. The school shall receive a Michigan basketball bitchslap vs. the SMU shut down. All of Reggie Bush’s games will be taken off the record books. The BCS will pile onto the ugliness. USC will have to hand back the hardware accumulated during his three seasons including the BSC trophy. The student bookstore will no longer be able to sell their National Champions t-shirts with those years included. The major hurt will be when the organizations demand the return of the BCS bowl money for the three prime games that featured Bush. There will be fireworks over a penalty check that totals more than $40 million.

Weekend Shopping Guide 2/1/08: Barbarians At The Gates

Filed under: Shopping Guides — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:21 am

weekendshopping.jpg

The weekend’s here. You’ve just been paid, and it’s burning a hole in your pocket. What’s a pop culture geek to do? In hopes of steering you in the right direction to blow some of that hard-earned cash, it’s time for the Quick Stop Weekend Shopping Guide – your spotlight on the things you didn’t even know you wanted…

After 6 seasons of awkward and painful comedy, the brilliant Curb Your Enthusiasm (HBO, Not Rated, DVD-$39.98 SRP) comes to a close with a season that certainly lives up to the squirm factor of previous outings, as Larry goes through a divorce that’s exacerbated by a family of Hurricane Katrina refugees living in his home. Suffice to say, if you haven’t yet seen this season – do so. Bonus features include a conversation with Larry David and Susie Essman, an on-set featurette, and a gag reel.

blankguide.gif

I’ve long been a fan of Monty Python alum Terry Jones’s series of historical documentaries, going back to his fascinating look at the Crusades. Jones presents the material with both a dramatic and affable flair, making intimidating subject matter as fascinating as it should be, while also illuminating oft misunderstood periods of history. His latest is Barbarians (Koch Vision, Not Rated, DVD-$29.98 SRP), a 4-part look at some of the most unfairly denigrated cultures of the ancient world, including in the Goths and the Celts.

blankguide.gif

We’re already up to the penultimate volume of DC’s 4-volume collection, Jack Kirby’s Fourth World Omnibus (DC Comics, $49.99 SRP), and I’m already feeling the impending depression once this glorious visit to Kirby’s tales of the New Gods is wrapped in a few short months. The classic 4-color printing and texture is captured perfectly, and to have that all wrapped up in a classy hardbound edition is just icing on an already rich cake.

blankguide.gif

The 4-part Pioneers Of Television (PBS, Not Rated, DVD-$24.99 SRP) documentary pretty much lives up to its title – featuring over 100 interviews, it explores the roots of late night TV, sitcoms, game shows, and variety. The disc also features extended interviews, for those left wanting more.

blankguide.gif

It’s taken 3 years, but my nephew has now been fully consumed by the SpongeBob virus, and has become Sqaurepantsed. With that in mind, I can guarantee that he will watch the new episode collection – SpongeBob Squarepants: To Love A Patty (Paramount, Not Rated, DVD-$16.99 SRP) – a few dozen times. The disc features 7 episodes, an animatic, and a karaoke music video.

blankguide.gif

The 8th season of ER (Warner Bros., Not Rated, DVD-$49.98 SRP) marked the swan song of Anthony Edwards’s Dr. Greene, leaving Noah Wylie as the last man standing from the show’s original cast. The 6-disc set features all 22 episodes, plus unaired scenes and the always welcome gag reel.

blankguide.gif

Released in the late 70’s, The Encyclopedia of Comic Book Heroes (DC Comics, $19.99 SRP) was a multi-volume set of tomes presenting the histories of various comic book characters up to that point in the academic style of an Encyclopedia. Given full access to the DC library, author Michael Fleischer produced the first mainstream attempt at treating comics as an art form whose character histories were worth studying. DC has been re-releasing these long out-of-print editions, with the volumes on Batman, Superman, and Wonder Woman currently available.

blankguide.gif

After whetting her appetite on The Shield, Glenn Close decided to jump into a TV series of her own with Damages (Sony, Not Rated, DVD-$49.95 SRP), which casts her as a complicated, heavily flawed top flight New York City personal litigator Patty Hewes, who spends the first season defending a wealthy CEO (Ted Danson) against a class action lawsuit. There’s plenty of intrigue to go around, most of it focusing on a first episode flash forward of Patty’s protégé Ellen Parsons… But I don’t want to spoil such a wonderful hook. Check out the complete first season, featuring commentaries, featurettes, deleted scenes, and more.

blankguide.gif

Through my nephew, I’ve been made aware of Nickelodeon’s CD version of Muppet Babies meets the Get-Along Gang, The Backyardigans. The multi-hued menagerie of backyard adventures have released a celebrity-studded album of songs from and inspired by the show, The Backyardigans: Born To Play (Sony BMG, $11.98 SRP). I’m sure this will get plenty of play around here, and is sure to give the Spongebob album a run for its money.

blankguide.gif

If you want a good lesson on how not to remake a film (and recent retake on The Stepford Wives wasn’t enough for you), then look no further than The Invasion (Warner Bros., Rated PG-13, DVD-$28.98 SRP) – boring, almost insultingly disposable remake of The Invasion Of The Body Snatchers starring Nicole Kidman and Daniel Craig as psychiatrists who discover that people are… well, you know… when they fall asleep. After watching this film, I must have been replaced a half dozen times. Bonus features include a trio of featurettes and a making-of documentary.

blankguide.gif

Oh, Aqua Teen. I once loved you, and thought you were the bees knees. The episodes contained in the 5th season set of the once funny Aqua Teen Hunger Force (Warner Bros., Not Rated, DVD-$29.98 SRP) are a microcosm of just ho far the show has fallen over the years, relying less on the funny and more on the gross. Sad, really. The 2-disc set features 14 episodes, plus promos, deleted scenes, featurettes, and more.

blankguide.gif

So there you have it… my humble suggestions for what to watch, listen to, play with, or waste money on this coming weekend. See ya next week…

-Ken Plume

##

Trailer Park: Joel Moore and Jeremy Boreing

Filed under: Columns,Interviews,Trailer Park — admin @ 12:04 am

By Christopher Stipp

Archives? Right Here…

I’m awesome. I wrote a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

I saw SPIRAL months ago.

You never quite know how many movies are out there that languish in the black hole of distribution hell but SPIRAL just felt like a step above a lot of its contemporaries. I wanted to see this one to make it but the odds are never in the favor of a film that has its own voice, its own sense of independence from the norm. That, alone, could have killed its chances but this film has proven itself for what it is: a Hitchcock-ian suspense thriller that delivers on its ability to be a fresh take on a genre that has been replaced in the mainstream by overtly horrific titles like SAW or HOSTEL.

Starring Joel Moore and Zachary Levi this modern tale of a guy who can’t get it together in a world that he has trouble navigating in (Moore) and a boss who has an equal amount of dysfunction in his own life (Levi) SPIRAL looks at what happens when the past is too much to be left there and what can happen when steps are made to move forward beyond it.

The film itself is superbly written and acted in but the real thrust of the film’s beauty is its cinematography and attention to the minute details of these character’s lives. Too often the brush strokes of a script want to accentuate the more visceral, eye-popping details of a character’s existence but SPIRAL takes its time to develop these people’s lives to the point where you start believing their existence, making the ending that much more thrilling.

The movie was one of the best thrillers I saw in 2007 and it was a delight to see that it’s not only going to make its theatrical debut in selected cities on February 8th and on video just a week and a half later on February 19th. The combination of Moore’s directing/writing and of Jeremy Boreing’s writing with Levi and Amber Tamblyn’s performances should prove to be the reason why this movie stands above most of the other independent fare that passes as film. SPIRAL demands to be seen as one of the best mind scramblers you can treat yourself to this winter.

I caught up with Joel Moore and Jeremy Boreing to talk about the process of making this film, about having to share writing duties, of Joel’s directing responsibilities and what it was like to see their written work come to life on the screen .

CHRISTOPHER STIPP: Hey, Joel, Jeremy.

JOEL MOORE: Hey, how are you doing?

CS: Good, good. This must be your third day of press. I can’t imagine how that’s been.

MOORE: Actually like five but it’s all good.

We’re really proud of this movie and we want to get it out to as many places as we can so the people can know about it. It’s really a dream come true for me and a movie that I think people will really enjoy and characters from actors that have spent a lot of time in the comedy world.

CS: Well, I’ve seen the film and I really liked it. Genuinely thrilling.

MOORE: Thanks. I really appreciate it.

CS: After seeing the movie, the character of Mason, which you play, doesn’t seem like a guy who really endears himself to the audience. I think people were supposed to like him in a way but the character tries at every opportunity to make it very tough to sympathize with his personality.

MOORE: It’s an uncomfortable character ““ it’s awkward. The nice thing about it is we went back and forth in the writing, Adam Green and I, the co-director of the film, and wanted to make sure it was a character that could be endearing enough and innocent enough that you could follow. And I think we did a good job.

JEREMY BOREING: When we first sat down to write the movie, the question came up several times ““ how do you write a film where the antagonistic character ““ he is an antagonistic character and he is the one who is the bad guy in the end ““ but we tried to maintain his innocence, not innocent in crime, but in his approach and motivation? I remember several people asked us if there were any fights on set and the truth is there weren’t but the closest thing to it was repeated conversation between Adam Green and myself. It was over (without giving away any spoilers) it was over the climatic scene with Joel and Amber.

And Adam, who brought his experience of HATCHET and love of horror to the film in a really positive way, helped us to really exploit the suspense and the scary moments of the picture. But he wanted that scene to be a certain way. He felt like it would align with Mason if he lost the ability to look back on the journey with any compassion. And the way I wanted to do it was very soft and natural looking. Now, if the scene were you’ve seen it so you know, what he does in that scene is he’s apologizing the entire time and that was sort of the compromise out of that conversation.

It’s one of the really inspired moments of the movie and it was born out of compromise of all the creative parts and our desire to keep Mason as likeable as possible. And then, of course, the other way we tried to do it was making the Berkeley character so outlandish. In the end he’s not the bad guy but we let him be the heavy throughout the film so there is at least a character that seems worse on the surface then Mason so we can balance out Mason and make him more likeable throughout.

CS: Jeremy, I’d like to ask you and Joel, and please jump in by all means since you guys co-wrote it, the character Zach Levi plays seems to be a Lothario. He’s almost a mean-spirited guy but he finds something in Mason and he sees himself almost as a protector. He plays two sides because he’s mean to everybody else but seems to like Mason. Why did you create him to be that way?

MOORE: We wanted to do something interesting with those two characters and have them mirror each other in a way.

Obviously, they’re very lonely characters and also have had some sort of trauma in the past. We give the audience hints of that as the movie progresses. And I think what is interesting is the difference between them is the way they reacted to those traumas. While the character Berkeley reacted by covering it up and trying to be outgoing and chauvinistic and being outgoing and just keeping himself in the spotlight so he cannot think about what’s going on.

Mason, in turn, wears his emotions on his sleeve and obviously reacted to his trauma by retreating into himself, so very neurotic and out of touch and awkward. It’s one of those reasons we put him as a worker in a phone bank because we wanted to put him around tons of people so the audience could see how awkward he is and how he wants to be involved and wants to deal with half these friends but doesn’t know how to because he doesn’t know how to relate to people.

And the other thing about the relationship is that Berkeley needs Mason just as much as Mason needs Berkeley. Mason is Berkeley’s ticket to still feeling like he is a good person. So he can be a jerk to everybody else in his life and he can be a jerk to Mason as well but at least he deals with Mason, whereas other people don’t. The scene between Tricia Helfer who plays Berkeley’s friend and did it wonderfully; I think she is just a class act, she kinda calls him out in the scene and says “He’s like your pet” and I think that is an important scene in the way Berkeley reacts to it. He says, yeah, I’m the same asshole who is a jerk to him from behind his back and in front of him and I am that guy but at least I’m his friend.

BOREING: I think that all three of the main characters deal with loneliness on different levels and as much as Berkeley seems like a cool guy but is abusive to women in his own way too. He is dealing with whatever the upbringing that sort of is implied throughout the picture that maybe the two of them share a similar history. It manifested itself in different ways.

Berkeley’s inability to have meaningful relationships with any of these women throughout the movie I think is part of the reason. And the same with Amber. Why would a girl like Amber wind up with a guy like Mason? I think why these three characters invest in each other is because they are the only three people they have to invest in. And I think that is just born out of the lonliness they have. They are isolated souls in a way and it manifests itself in different ways as it filters through their personalities. One is a womanizer, one is a chatterbox, and one of them may or may not be troubled but they are all dealing with a fundamental issue.

CS: Could you talk about the writing process itself, i.e. co-writing? Where did the process begin?

BOREING: Basically, I wrote the movie but the only way I could convince Joel to be in it was to give him credit.

MOORE: The movie started from a short film I had written and I brought it to Jeremy and he said “Let’s make a picture out of it.” So we took the idea from the short and did a lot of character development. It was an interesting process because we just locked ourselves in my living room and worked around a movie I was shooting at the time. We wanted to fill out the depth of these characters and took a lot from where we were in our life. A great friend of ours, Todd Caldwell is a jazz musician and has a bunch of jazz songs. So we thought it would be great to actually score this as a jazz score. We brought Todd together with Michael Fish Herring and the two of them scored a what I think is the best part of the movie: the score. It’s phenomenal. It’s a full jazz score and digital jazz ““ all live jazz. And you never see that. It’s analog. You don’t see anything except a classical score. So we knew we were taking a chance in scoring with jazz elements. We didn’t know what would fit where and how effective it was ““ it was a hard and difficult process.

CS: And certainly you co-directing, co-producing, writing, what was that process like having to navigate with so many hats on your head? Did it help the performance? Did you find that you were constantly trying to stay one step ahead ““ thinking about things as you were doing them?

MOORE: It was interesting. I knew that I wanted to work with Adam again on something but I didn’t know that as soon as he finished HATCHET, 5 months later, we agreed to do SPIRAL. And we had been talking the whole time about HATCHET and trying to find something we can work on so it was just a delight to grab this. Adam and I worked together very well.

Sometimes you don’t know how co-directing is going to go ““ two different people – but because we did so much work before, looked at shot lists and did everything that we could before we got on the set everything was figured out. And, of course, life and being on set shows you about having to deal with being thrown for loops. But we were prepared for the loops and Adam and I are very creative guys and met at a level of hustle and passion and creativity.

We didn’t not make our days very often. We rarely went into overtime. There were a handful of times we had to push over our normal 12 hours. But it went really well and a lot of that I have to give credit to Craig Borden, our first assistant director who also worked on HATCHET and our local crew in Portland, Oregon, my hometown. I set this in places that I lived in growing up. Mt. Tabor, where Mason played basketball ““ that’s where I played basketball growing up. Amber and Mason would go feed ducks ““ that’s where I would go when I was 4 years old. Portland is a beautiful backdrop for a film and it was wonderful to go to all these places that I knew. And it also helps in writing the film as well because then you know what you are dealing with, you know the locations.

CS: Based on that, and certainly, Jeremy, chime in, after you finished the script and were in the process of creating it while you were shooting, did you find that there were some portions of the script that worked better than others?

MOORE: Basically everything that I wrote in the script stayed and the things that Jeremy wrote were cut.

(Laughs)

Jeremy had written a lot more than I had and is a very talented writer and he knew a page count that made sense for what we were shooting and was able to get the dialogue and a script that we could shoot. One of the things we also did that, again, since it was our first movie, was to create scenes in the same place because we couldn’t shoot in 25 different locations. We needed a solid 4 or 5 main locations and then we could go pop out and do an outside shot or a rain shot or do whatever we needed but it needed to take place in these 4 or 5 locations so that we could shoot for 5 days in one place. We needed to get everything we needed done. And then go 5 days and shoot somewhere else.

It really helped in scheduling for us to get this done in 18 days.

BOREING: I’ve written things and Joel hadn’t done as much as that but he made films and I hadn’t been a part of that process. I probably had more moments of being not so much surprised but interested in the distinctions between the way I thought things would be on the page and the way they wound up being.

One of the coolest moments for me in my life was being not only a writer but a producer of the film too. As a producer of the film I was party to the hiring of the crew and the winding up of equipment and the spending of the money. But until that first day we walked on set, that beautiful cemetery in Portland, Oregon and saw all these trucks and cranes and all these people and extras everywhere ““ even knowing theoretically they were going to be there seeing this fully moving big production of a feature film, it was really surprising in an emotional way to me.

And then also the scare moments ““ Adam and Joel put together a shot list and have a lot of experience in that field ““ in how to create scare and amplify the suspense and there were moments on set where I was just really amazed at how he could take just a few words off the page and turn them into being great. One of the scenes with the homeless guy on the street playing a saxophone and the way Mason flashes back to a moment back earlier in his life with that exact song being played on a record and the girl scared him. That was written in the script but to see that come alive ““ that visual creativity ““ the way Adam and Joel put it together was not surprising, that’s not the right word, but it was inspiring and exceeded my expectations for sure.

CS: Based on that, Joel, coming off of HATCHET with Adam Green ““ these movies are two different kinds of beasts. What was it like taking this script – HATCHET, where you were on one side of the camera and now taking SPIRAL, where you were doing many jobs ““ what was vital to keep things to keep the suspense level up? Was it a try this try that, see what works, what doesn’t work…Did you know doing certain things was the way to keep things suspenseful in creating this movie?

MOORE: We made sure that we didn’t go too long without having a moment of ““ a suspense moment/a scare moment, so that people, the audience wouldn’t just get scared…We just wanted to remind them that while things were going well between Amber and Mason that he’s dealing with some heavy stuff that’s still haunting him. There is just something that is really disturbing him and he can’t get rid of even though he’s met this wonderful gal and is making him normal as he’s ever been. He has, like, 7 lines in the whole movie and goes about 40 minutes without saying much of anything and then just spouts off his idea of painting and art and what it means and there’s this pause at the end and Amber says what has hurt you and it was at that moment you’re like this dude is getting it, this guy is opening up and maybe this is the girl who is going to bring him out of where he is. Right after that we throw in this kind of shocking image of something of a flashback of his that pulls you back.

CS: What was that connection you wanted to make with art and jazz as it relates to Mason’s psychosis?

BOREING: The film starts out as an exploration of loneliness and the way it affects these three people and the world right now is we have more contact with people and we are all better attached and connected than ever before but we are constantly on guard at the superficiality that relationships can become when every thought you have can be instantly communicated and texted…then there’s not that depth of thought and reason.

I think we are all kind of struggling with that and it’s something Joel and I talked a lot about in the writing of the film. I think, in answer to your question specific to Mason is that he, like a lot of us, wants to be the cool guy.

It’s funny, a lot of actors try to define what is cool for the country but none of them would have been considered cool in high school. If they were cool in high school, they would have gotten the girl, gotten married when they were 18 and would not have moved to L.A.

So, there is this interesting phenomenon that the people who are in the arts can sort of relate to this loneliness. Mason can’t do a 9 to 5 job out in the world and with the fluorescent lights and the headset and timecard he can’t be himself, he can’t relate in that environment. And a lot of us who come out here are that way ““ exaggerated to the degree of a Mason but when he’s at home he is immersed in the music that he loves and the art that he loves and thinks that he’s knowledgeable about things that he can relate to and open up to be the artistic, insightful guy and again, that is Joel, or that is Zac and that is Adam Green, even Amber Tamblyn. They are not at this extreme as Mason ““ we are telling a story here that is fiction – but then we can all relate.

The jazz and the oil and canvas is probably the least accessible art forms as far as the general population is concerned and we are not claiming to be those guys either but we wanted to pick the ones that were the least accessible because Mason does relate to them. He is a super intelligent guy. He does understand the nature of jazz and the nature of visual art and that’s where he thrives. And, unfortunately, the world doesn’t know what to do with a guy like Mason and just as unfortunately with his personality traits he doesn’t know what to do with himself either. He can’t find the conformity necessary to function. And I think the reason we picked jazz is because we had those things in our environment. Like Joel said, our friend is a jazz artist and I think they just lent themselves to the story we were telling.

CS: And on the process side of things, with the budget you had as you were shaping the script into an actual movie, did you find roadblocks along the way, things you wanted to do but couldn’t because of the budget or were you able to execute everything to get this story told the way you wanted to see it be told?

MOORE: Um”¦.a mixture of both of them. We wanted the movie to be a small budget movie because we knew we were going to do it ourselves. We wrote it and again, it doesn’t have an incredible amount of locations and we kept the imagery and action scenes at a level that wasn’t a huge car chase ““ that’s million dollar stuff in and of itself. So, we kept it within our budget. We knew what was possible for us. And we even had moments within that budget that I think one of the important things to me was to be able to shoot this on film we shot it on Panavision cameras and Kodak film and I think that’s where a lot of the cinematic beauty comes from. It has a warm feel and you are able to do so much with the film with the lighting because we had a great crew.

But the visuals in this movie are what drives the movie because a lot of this movie are just two people talking and the cameraman is playing a character, a part in this movie ““ voyeuristically speaking. He is watching Mason as he’s going through his struggles. All of that was accessible to us. Because all of that is creating, between Adam and I, how the shot is going to look. We had these long shots of steadicam just moving around the world and one of my favorite shots in the whole movie is when Mason comes in from talking to Amber on the street and not inviting her up because he obviously has paintings of this other woman on his wall and he’s not ready for that transition. Mason looks out, looks at the paintings, and then storms into the bathroom. That shot right there is just one shot. It just moves all the way around and introduces you to the block where Mason spends 90% of his time.

CS: And did it take a long time to get the tracking shot to get something like that to go off? How many takes?

MOORE: Well, thanks to the talents BJ (McDowell), our steadicam operator and Dustin (Pearlman) and Lewis (Fowler), our camera guys ““ the three of them were stolen from the HATCHET set because they did such a great job there and brought them up to Portland. They are the big reason why we could get away with a lot of steadicam shots. We didn’t have to do a lot of wheels and tracking because it takes a lot more time to set that up. We did do all our tracking shots with a steadicam and we did do some tracking shots still, we put some on a dolly and wanted some things to be moving so we put on a three foot slider that we just put up sticks so we could just move the camera back and forth. So there were some tracking shots but 90% of what is assumed to be tracking shots is actually done on a steadicam. It allowed us to move a lot quicker and a lot more fluid and have more creation of the shots. And tracking also sometimes limits. If you are going to set up a dolly that is five feet ““ it only moves one way. If it’s a shot that is coming from Mason to a doll sitting in a chair that is obviously imaginary, we want to pull from that all the way over to Mason and see the chair in the shot. You can’t do that on a dolly. You can but it’s easier to do it with a steadicam. A lot of these shots were tough on BJ, which is good. We tried to be as hard on our steadicam op as we could.

CS: Was this really a movie by committee? Obviously there was a lot of harmony going on between a lot of people but what was that dynamic like having a lot of people having their hands in the process where you have a writer-director-producer being one guy?

MOORE: It really was a movie by committee and it was a special process because it was. While we were able as a team to understand we had limited time every day and only three and a half weeks to do the film, everybody was just on their feet working hard everyday and wearing different hats, our line producer was our UPM, our writer was our producer in Jeremy, and we brought Cory on early in the process because of his strength producing and just came off of HATCHET and the two of them working together just helped the project become so fluid and EVERYBODY would put their hands in whatever way they could, whether it’s just moving a light to try and get a shot done, and somebody running around saying, “OK I’ve got 7 minutes. We got to light this in 7 minutes and just pop it in.” And our crew, Sarge, and the whole crew of electricians, we just had a crew that was really hustling on the set. It was cool and unique because people knew that we were making a unique piece here.

BOREING: And I do consider SPIRAL, which doesn’t mean it isn’t flawed ““ it’s flawed in it’s writing and acting and directing and everything – but it is a piece of art the same way a painting has flaws but it’s still a piece of art. It’s different than an action movie. We knew what we were doing and our hope is that we delivered something that folks would enjoy as one big painting in all different aspects.

MOORE: It was a movie by committee, that’s true but the better way to say that is that as the process went on, our natural gifts emerged in a way that maybe we didn’t know so, not that there weren’t any bumps and bruises along the way, but no collaboration is completely painless but as we went forward we all learned where we can trust each other and didn’t have the right skill sets to deal with certain problems. It wasn’t a committee decision every time a decision needed to be made, it was a collaboration of certain kinds of people making certain decisions. Still, one person made decisions about the picture but there were 10 of us sitting around trying to figure out what something costs and funneled into these natural roles. It’s a lot easier to be collaborative and productive but it was the way we all got through this process successfully.

CS: And gentlemen, if I just had one more question for you both, after the film was done filming and you are now in the editing room, what were some of the greatest surprises you saw when it was finally coming together as a coherent film? We you surprised by things that you didn’t think were present that popped up on the screen?

MOORE: I sort of took the reign in the editing in this movie and it was a great process. I put together this movie wonderfully but it was a two hour cut of it and we knew it had to be an hour and a half so we knew that we had to take 30 minutes out of this movie. So then we went into this frantic mode of everybody trying to give notes and nobody wants to cut any part of it. Nobody wants to cut anything that they have spent money and time on but we made some big cuts early on and lost some things that we wanted to have in this movie. And then I went back and cut things between the scenes here and there ““ cut a scene short here ““ maybe cut some dialogue and as I did that after my first pass of the movie as a whole we ended up 15 minutes shorter. So then we decided that we needed to put those scenes back in and cut the fat out and ended up with a movie that we didn’t lose one single scene that we needed that we wanted to give the audience.

This movie is developed around kicks I guess ““ the mystery of what’s going on ““ what is Berkeley going to do with the waitress, how is he going to deal with Amber’s character ““ all these things ““ all scenes lead to the final shocking end and to get rid of a scene gets rid of the facts that we needed to tell the story. You could actually cut all the fat out between and keep the movie. It was really a nice with what we ended up with and, I hope, entertaining.

To us it’s an accomplishment because it’s what we wanted to tell.

CS: Thank you gentlemen for being able to talk to me today. I appreciate it.

Absolutely.

Win BLIND DATING on DVD!

Filed under: Contests — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:02 am

We’re giving away, in conjunction with Fox Home Entertainment, five (5) copies of BLIND DATING on DVD.

Danny (Chris Pine, Star Trek 2008), is smart, handsome, popular, and blind”¦ and not just physically: He also can’t see how wild women are for him! Even his sexy therapist (Jane Seymour, Dancing With The Stars) can’t keep her clothes on around Danny! After a series of painful “blind dates” set up by his brother Eddie Kaye Thomas (American Pie), Danny falls for a young Indian woman (Anjali Jay), and finally everything seems picture perfect. But when cultures clash and she reveals that she’s been promised to someone else (Sendhil Ramamurthy, Heroes), Danny must prove to her that love is more than meets the eye.

Contest ends at midnight EST on Friday, February 8th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of Quick Stop Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Friday, February 8th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

Quick Stop Thingamabobs: 2/1/2008

Filed under: Columns,Thingamabobs — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:01 am

thingamabobs.jpg

The web. It’s a big place, full of plenty of distractions ““ some funny, some informative, some ludicrous, some disturbing, some inane, some profound. Each and every weekday, we present links to a few of our favorite finds”¦

————————————————

January 31, 2008

Win TORCHWOOD: SEASON 1 on DVD!

Filed under: Contests — UncaScroogeMcD @ 1:21 am

We’re giving away, in conjunction with Warner Bros. Home Video, two (2) copies of TORCHWOOD: SEASON 1 on DVD.

Contest ends at midnight EST on Thursday, February 7th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of Quick Stop Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Thursday, February 7th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

Quick Stop Thingamabobs: 1/31/2008

Filed under: Columns,Thingamabobs — UncaScroogeMcD @ 1:02 am

thingamabobs.jpg

The web. It’s a big place, full of plenty of distractions ““ some funny, some informative, some ludicrous, some disturbing, some inane, some profound. Each and every weekday, we present links to a few of our favorite finds”¦

————————————————

  • Craig Ferguson takes his citizenship test… (Thingamabob)

January 30, 2008

Trailer Park: Dane Cook Interview

Filed under: Columns,Interviews,Trailer Park — admin @ 12:03 am

By Christopher Stipp

Archives? Right Here…

I’m awesome. I wrote a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

How do you like your romantic comedies?

Me, the less I have to think and/or engage the better. What made GOOD LUCK CHUCK a solid entry into the genre was that it knew what it was and didn’t over-extend its grasp. It was a breezy film that brought together two notables in pop culture, Dane Cook and Jessica Alba, and smooshed them into an Oreo of gooey love.

Love it or leave it the movie did well enough in its theatrical run and it went on to do well in the international market. When the movie was released on DVD mere weeks ago I had the chance to talk to Dane Cook about everything you wish you could ask him regarding his swift rise to pop consciousness and all the slagging that goes along with being such a high profile target for people like Saturday Night Live during the World Series and the video, Dane Cooks, which showcase why this is best form of flattery for a man who has taken stand-up comedy from the peripheral of society to the mainstream with his best selling CD, television show and concert specials.

If I could pay Dane the best compliment I can it would be that his honesty during this brief, brief interview just cemented my respect for one of the prolific comics in the business today.

*****For those who would like to win a copy of the DVD to taste the GOOD LUCK CHUCK goodness just leave a message below. It can’t get any easier than this…*****

line.gif

CHRISTOPHER STIPP: Hey Dane, quick question regarding your comedic performance in GOOD LUCK CHUCK ““ Did this experience teach you anything at all about how to translate what people love most about your live shows as to what they should be able to appreciate about your film work? Has it changed your philosophy about how to approach romantic comedy or comedy in general?

DANE COOK: Yes, very much so. I definitely feel like, the term, within your wheelhouse, in figuring out how ““ I love guys like Steve Martin, THE JERK, or when Sandler did WATERBOY ““ we can look at so many comedians and ask what role finally put their pin on the map. I don’t know up until GOOD LUCK CHUCK if I found that fit ““ the physicality and language. So when I signed on for GOOD LUCK CHUCK I got to explore a lot of broad comedy ““ physical comedy, slapstick, to bring all the elements of stand up comedy performance together that’s very difficult to do. I don’t think I have done that yet. I don’t think I’ve had that role quite yet that perfectly combines many of the elements I’ve done on stage. I’ll continue to seek that out. It’s great to pick and choose and incorporate bits and pieces.

CS: I am curious as to get your thoughts on the cult of celebrity after doing some high profile projects like EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH and GOOD LUCK CHUCK, having the media surrounding you and your relationships and parodies of you like Dane Cooks. How do you feel about what celebrity does to a person ““ what a big spotlight can do to you ““ to a person?

COOK: This question is difficult to answer in one felt swoop because celebrity is tricky man. I’ve seen everything happen to people. I’m a person who sticks close to ““ I’ve had the same friends for 20 years, I have a big family ““ I have 5 sisters and a brother in my family. I’m pretty quiet away from performing. I love to create and when I go home I love to just be in the real world.

The celebrity thing is so foolish, so bizarre the way the laser once in a while hits a person and just evaporates them. You see it all the time. These people start to believe the stuff that’s written about them or even become what the media wants you to become. It’s ping-pong. I never had a career that was so instant success-wise that it was like overnight sensation. Although people might say he came from out of no where but for a long time I had a slow steady trajectory and I got to kind of step around some of that.

But to be in a position now where sometimes people take shots it’s always cool to have an SNL or somebody want to send you up but I think when you start becoming a parody of yourself, that’s when things start to spiral out of control. I know my answer is a mess and all over the place but I try to stick around people who are into the create and not the drama because it’s so easy to participate in that and then suddenly you are caught up in lies and crap.

So, yeah, I stay close to home and I don’t want to end up being one of those people sitting on the side of it after the machine chews you up and spits you out. Here’s one thing about the machine that I, and again different for everybody, different answers, you do have control of the machine, you do have your hand on a button or a lever. You can control the speed. There is no one in this industry that can’t, unless they have really crazy people around them, you can be like, “Hey, I think I’m going to hop on a plane and leave for a minute.”

Anyone that stays in it I question that sometimes.

You have the ability to say “You know what, I think I’ll take a break” or go to Europe”¦you don’t have to stay in this bizarre oasis. It’s like if I start feeling weird I go back to Boston, hang out with people who don’t give a crap about Hollywood, I take out the trash, I eat at the old stomping ground. I feel like a regular guy again.

So, good luck with how you handle editing that one!

(Laughs)

There will be a lot of parenthesis in that like (Dean gets very serious). Quite a hypothesis on that answer”¦sorry about that.

CS: Quick question about your comedy as a whole. You said you were taking a break ““ you’re taking a step back, when you do take a break between these sorts of projects and what have you, does it change your overall spin on how you want to change the way you do your comedy when you do come back, or for lack of a better term, do you have a formula regardless of how long or how much you do touring or stand up?

COOK: You are asking a fantastic question because these are things I am exploring in myself. To be really honest, I don’t even really know what a break is.

I love working.

I find that some people say you should take a break and I say I kinda am but I’m still working. I love being on stage and yet after doing it straight through for so many years ““ I’ve done stand up for so many years every night didn’t take a night off unless it was a holiday or I was sick, and then finally to have “boom” kind of broken through it was like, this is my time, I don’t know how long it’s going to last “Can I turn this into a full career?” so I spent three years making movies and still making the families happy so I’m actually at the point right now where stepping back on stage regardless of the 7 hour set I did just a little while ago.

I finished this big tour, I put out my latest CD and now I’m in a period where I’m kind of reinventing the wheel. I’m going back”¦some of the new stuff I have is sort of a departure”¦I’ve always looked at my comedy in general and it should be an evolution ““ that you are never done, so I’m at a point right now that it’s fun to be a little scared of stand up. I hit the reset button. I’m not doing anything old. I’m working on all new ideas. So having stepped away from comedy in that sense doing films I’m bring a new life perspective back. It’ll be interesting here as I’m piecing it together I could probably speak to you more at the end of this year. Right now I’m fitting in with your question in figuring out what is it that I want to say now and how do I want to entertain people in the world of comedy.

CS: Dane, if I could close with the final question ““ I’m paraphrasing but Chris Rock said there’s the Stand Up Comedian’s Success Kit. Included in the kit is a movie, a book, a television show, now while you’ve said you’ve done pilots of a television show do you think that you will write a book? Do you think you will find success in a television show or do you think you’ve honed your craft well enough where you don’t have to spread your brand of comedy over different forms of media?

COOK: I think this is a time for me ““ I just want to – like Steve Martin’s book, for example ““ he’s a guy I really wanted to emulate in certain areas of my career. I’ve achieved this year everything I set out to do in my life that I said I wanted to do. I wanted to make movies, I dreamed about doing an arena tour when I was very young ““ I saw Steve Martin at Madison Square Garden and I had the “Wild and Crazy Guy” album, which I still have and am staring at the original album which I still have in my office right here.

So this year I finally, after many many years, have completed everything I set out to do. And I’ve done a couple movies that have been successful on different levels so now I’m really in a metamorphis now. I have another movie coming out this year with Kate Hudson. I’m really proud of it it’s a greater step in a direction of what I want to do and how I want to do my comedy in film. But I’m really interested in telling all kinds of stories.

So I think yes, you are right, there’s the book, the TV show, the movies, and certainly seems to be the path that has been laid for the successful comic. I’m leaving that path now. I’ve traveled that path, I’ve had different levels from marginal to great successes and now I’m daring myself to do more. Go see me on stage and after this rest I’ll get into the new evolution of my stand up, but I’ve got some irons in the fire that are quite different ““ a couple documentaries that are far from anything comedic and producing. I look at fine young talent and try to nurture this young talent. I’m going to dare myself to get off that path and take some risks that are outside the traditional kit that comes with comedy. So, we’ll go with that and see what comes next.

CS: Brillant ““ thanks so much Dane.

COOK: No worries ““ you got it!

Win THE COMEBACKS on DVD!

Filed under: Contests — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:02 am

We’re giving away, in conjunction with Warner Bros. Home Video, five (5) copies of THE COMEBACKS on DVD.

Spoofing some of the most inspirational sports films of all, The Comebacks is the story of an out-of-luck coach (David Koechner, Anchorman, Thank You for Smoking) trying to lead a ragtag team of fumbling footballers to victory before his long-suffering wife (Melora Hardin, The Office, 27 Dresses) leaves him and his sexy gymnast daughter (Brooke Nevin) gets bent out of shape.

Contest ends at midnight EST on Wednesday, February 6th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of Quick Stop Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Wednesday, February 6th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

Quick Stop Thingamabobs: 1/30/2008

Filed under: Columns,Thingamabobs — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:01 am

thingamabobs.jpg

The web. It’s a big place, full of plenty of distractions ““ some funny, some informative, some ludicrous, some disturbing, some inane, some profound. Each and every weekday, we present links to a few of our favorite finds”¦

————————————————

  • Prepare for Chuck Jones Tuesday… And where better than with “Rabbit Seasoning”… (Thingamabob)

January 29, 2008

Comics in Context #211: The Silent Rabbit

Filed under: Columns,Comics in Context — admin @ 1:00 pm

comicsincontext4.jpg

cic2008-01-291.gifOne of the questions on The Beat’s annual survey for her Publishers Weekly blog is to ask what “guilty pleasures” her contributors are anticipating in the new year. Last year I named the forthcoming Disney DVD release of The Adventures of Oswald the Lucky Rabbit, collecting the silent cartoon series that Walt Disney made just before the creation of Mickey Mouse. This DVD set finally came out in December, and I now realize that there’s nothing “guilty” about the pleasures these cartoons provide. I expected they’d be interesting as foreshadowings of Disney’s later work, but not particularly good in and of themselves. But the Oswald cartoons turned out to delightful period pieces from the early history of animation. Watching these, you can see that Disney was already well on his way to the success he would achieve only a year later with Mickey Mouse.

The Disney company hadn’t released the Oswald series on home video earlier because it didn’t own the cartoons or the character until recently. Back in the 1920s Walt Disney made the Oswald series for distribution by Universal. But then, as a featurette on the DVD explains, Universal sprang surprises on the young Disney: not only did they own Oswald, but they had also hired Disney’s animation staff away from him–except for his best animator, Ub Iwerks, who remained loyal–and would produce the Oswald series without him. This proved to be a blessing in disguise, since Disney was now determined to remain independent and own his own intellectual property; soon he and Iwerks jointly created Mickey Mouse, and Disney was on his way to becoming a cultural colossus. Recently, Disney’s new, enlightened management made a deal with NBC Universal in which Disney regained control of Oswald, and this DVD set soon followed.

Not only does the Oswald DVD set contain copies of all the extent Disney Oswald cartoons (which apparently took some hunting), but also some 1920s Disney cartoons that preceded and followed the making of the Oswald shorts.

The three cartoons that preceded Oswald are from Disney’s Alice Comedies series. Whereas in Max and Dave Fleischer’s silent animated series Out of the Inkwell, a cartoon character, Koko the Clown, entered the real (live action) world, in the Alice shorts a live action girl, Alice, appears within a cartoon world populated by anthropomorphic animals. Hence the evocation of Lewis Carroll’s Alice in the series’ title is quite appropriate.

In watching the first Alice short included in this set, Alice Gets Stung (1925), I was initially surprised by how little Alice appeared in it, though perhaps I shouldn’t have been, since I presume that it was harder and more expensive to combine live action footage of the girl portraying Alice with the animation than it was to do the animation alone.

Making Alice’s regular costar, Julius, a cat who looks an awful lot like Felix the Cat seems too much like imitating the competition. (It seems that Disney’s distributor insisted on having a cat in the cartoons: see here) But, as noted, even the premise of Alice is simply taking the Fleischers’ idea for Inkwell and reversing it. At this point Disney is still reacting to his competitors’ ideas rather than heading in a brand new direction.

Alice Gets Stung begins with a lengthy sequence with Julius the cat chasing a rabbit (which doesn’t strike me as being a cat’s natural prey) and the rabbit’s efforts at thwarting him. For example, Julius reaches down into one rabbit hole, while the rabbit emerges from another hole behind him. This is a variation on what became a standard gag in Bugs Bunny-Elmer Fudd encounters. Watching this cartoon, I felt that Disney had stumbled onto the idea of the rabbit as trickster–but perhaps didn’t yet know what he had. Shouldn’t the rabbit be the star animal of this cartoon, not the cat, who, as the predator, seems to be playing the bad guy? Maybe this rabbit points to the creation of Oswald, though it would be Warners that perfected the idea of the animated trickster rabbit with Bugs Bunny.

Even though Daffy Duck can get blasted by Elmer Fudd over and over without suffering greater harm than a temporarily displaced beak, many classic Warners cartoons still depend on the audience’s belief that the hunter or predator could potentially do harm to the animal hero: Wile E. Coyote does indeed want to eat the Roadrunner, and Elmer Fudd does indeed want to kill the wabbit. In the world of Alice Gets Stung, there seems to be no real threat of death or even injury. At one point Julius pulls off the lower half of the rabbit, but the halves soon rejoin, and the rabbit seemingly suffers no pain whatsoever. Later, Julius removes his own eyes and mouth and positions them over one of the rabbit holes; when the rabbit emerges from the other hole, the eyeless cat captures her. This is a rather grotesque extension of the convention of the Felix the Cat silent cartoons, whereby Felix can detach part of his body, like his tail: at another point in this cartoon, the rabbit uses her tail to powder her face. Amusing as this sort of thing can be in silent cartoons, it also makes the characters seem overly unreal, and one can see why later funny animal cartoons mostly disposed of this convention of detachable body parts.

You’ll notice I refer to the rabbit as “she”: this was a surprise, too. Once caught, the rabbit pours out a sob story about her infant children–whom we see in a brief vignette, all in the same cradle and wailing for “Mama”–as two other rabbits play violins, with heart and flowers appearing onscreen as substitutes for music. Moved, Julius lets the rabbit go, whereupon the rabbit laughs at the cat–presumably her story was all a lie–and the chase resumes. This time Julius pursues the rabbit down the rabbit hole where, with no evident cause, the rabbit suddenly grows to giant size and the tables are turned. There is no logical reason why this should happen, but I suppose the rabbit’s increased size might be a metaphor for growing braver and more aggressive, having gaining the advantage once she is on her home ground.

The live action Alice shows up and, in a neat trick, is shown carrying a cartoon fire hydrant. which she and Julius then use literally to flush the rabbit out of her hole. But again this struck me as misjudgment by Disney. Why is our heroine joining the cat in pursuing the rabbit? Shouldn’t we root for the rabbit, as the predator’s potential victim, and admire her cleverness?

The “hearts and flowers” sequence suggests that Disney might already have been longing for the opportunities that sound could provide for his cartoons. So does the next major sequence in Alice Gets Stung, which shows animals playing music as members of a band. This prefigures Disney’s The Band Concert a decade later. Moreover, in Alice Gets Stung animals’ tails get pulled to cause them to emit musical notes, a gag that would be much more famously used in the first Mickey Mouse cartoon to be released, Steamboat Willie. Alice Gets Stung also uses the image of the conductor–in this case, a bear-that would keep recurring in classic Hollywood theatrical cartoons, including The Band Concert.

Alice shoots a gun at one of a pair of dancing bears. This is another misjudgment by Disney; why should the heroine attack an animal that has been entertaining the audience? In the world of the Alice shorts, however, even being shot repeatedly does not harm the bear, who begins dancing in time to the (silent) gunshots. But after bullets sever his head and limbs, once his body parts rejoin, the bear is understandably enraged. Frightened, Alice and Julius shrink in size (reversing the previous bit of the rabbit growing gigantic with courage) and Alice becomes a cartoon character herself. In the end she and the cat are beset by bees, thus finally providing an explanation for the cartoon’s title.

Death seems to be real in the next Alice cartoon included, Alice in the Wooly West (1926), although the rules by which it operates are unclear. This time Julius looks even more like Felix and he is cast as a Western gunfighter. Bandit mice hold up the passengers of a stagecoach, but Julius rides to the rescue and shoots the mice dead. This is even more startling if you consider that with the creation of Mickey Mouse, Disney would soon firmly establish the convention that in funny animal cartoons, mice are the good guys and cats are the bad guys.

The head of the bandits looks like a bear in a top hat, who seems to be, yea, the forebear of the principal villain in the Oswald cartoons, the top-hatted Putrid Pete. The bear kidnaps Alice, and in the ensuing battle, Julius separates the bear’s head from his body with repeated blows. This causes the bear no harm, his head and body rejoin, and the conflict continues.

In a reworking of a gag from the previous cartoon, this time Julius removes not his eyes but his black fur to use as a decoy. Julius not only clobbers the bear from behind but actually buries him on camera, leaving a flower on his grave! It’s as if Bugs Bunny literally killed Yosemite Sam! So here’s another mistake that Disney would avoid in years to come.

But Alice rejoices, although Julius is embarrassed at her seeing him in his underwear. It’s an odd gag if you think about it, since it evokes the human taboo on nudity by using an animal, to which the taboo would not apply. Variations on this gag would get stranger still in the Oswald series.

The third Alice cartoon in the set, Alice’s Balloon Race (1925), foreshadows the airplane race in the Oswald cartoon, and in both the villain is a bear in a top hat whom the Oswald series would call Putrid Pete. (What an unfortunate adjective to apply to someone with such an appealing first name!)

I was particularly impressed by a bit in which Alice’s balloon crashes in the background and she bounces out into the foreground. Running the sequence back on my DVD player, I could see the point at which the tiny cartoon Alice who is bounced out of the balloon turns into the live action Alice who lands in the foreground. But it happens so quickly that the audience surely had the illusion that it was the real Alice all the time.

Bodies are even more malleable and unkillable in this short than in the others. Falling from the sky, Julius smashes into bits upon hitting the ground, and immediately resumes shape and life. Later Julius enacts a typical Felix-style gag, detaching his tail and turning it into an umbrella. But then this cat goes way further into the grotesque: he eats his tail, which then emerges from the back of his head and then slides down his back until it reaches its proper position. Even the animation experts on this cartoon’s commentary track reacted as if they nearly couldn’t believe their eyes.

The first Oswald cartoon in the DVD set, Trolley Troubles (1927) presents its hero as the driver of a means of public transportation, picking up passengers, just as Steamboat Willie does with Mickey. Oswald looks chubbier here than heroes in the other cartoons. He’s also the visual missing link between Felix the Cat and Mickey Mouse. All three are short and black, with white “faces,” black noses, and round heads: the major difference is in the shape of the ears. In Trolley Troubles Oswald also proves to have detachable body parts, using his tail as a brush. More disturbingly, he detaches his lucky rabbit’s foot and rubs it on his head for luck.

In these cartoons Oswald displays a range of emotions that foreshadows Mickey and later animated characters. Unlike many later animated stars, with the major exceptions of Donald and Daffy Duck, Felix, Oswald and the early Mickey were easily prone to anger. In Trolley Troubles Oswald literally hits an obese passenger off the vehicle.

In the most striking sequence, Oswald’s trolley plummets through a series of tunnels. Oswald stands in the foreground, his back to the audience, so we are essentially watching the sequence from his point of view, or, to put it differently, it is as if we are riding the trolley along with him, as the cavernous openings to the tunnels engulf the screen. It’s reminiscent of riding a roller coaster; it’s an early version of the sort of effect that today one might expect to find in a video game.

With the next cartoon, Oh Teacher (1927) Oswald embarks upon a theme that was not often to be found in Felix or Inkwell cartoons: love. here Oswald has a girlfriend, a female rabbit; this obviously prefigures the relationship between Mickey and Minnie Mouse, which is so important to the early Mickey cartoons.

When she accidentally tumbles into a lake, the unnamed girlfriend cries “HELP!”; not only do the letters appear onscreen, but Oswald rides them. as if they were a horse, to the lake to try to rescue her. Earlier in the short a question mark, used to denote a character’s puzzlement, was employed as a hook by the cartoon’s villain. These silent cartoons thus emphasize their own artificiality by taking an written word or a punctuation mark and turning it into a physical object. Maybe the detachable body parts in these cartoons serve a similar purpose: reminding the audience that Oswald and company are pen and ink creations, just as when Koko devolves back into ink at the end of his cartoons.

The girlfriend mistakenly thinks that it was the cat who saved her and snubs Oswald. The cat literally knocks Oswald’s head off, and though the head bounces back onto Oswald’s body, this still seems unintentionally disturbing. It is somehow easier to suspend disbelief and accept an anthropomorphic rabbit as real than it is to accept the idea that a living being can survive beheading.

In the standout sequence of Oh Teacher, Oswald angrily waits behind a schoolhouse to clobber the bullying cat with a brick. The cat unexpectedly comes up behind him, and Oswald nervously tries to hide the brick behind his back, switching it from one hand to the other. When the cat spots the brick, Oswald desperately starts lifting the brick with one hand, as if he is using it for weightlifting exercise. All of this happens in pantomime without a single word onscreen. This is real animated acting; the three Alice cartoons did not even attempt anything like this.

The next cartoon, Great Guns! (1927), suggests that even a decade after the devastation of World War I, Americans had a different attitude towards war than they do today. When war is declared in this cartoon, animals immediately enlist in the armed forces en masse, including Oswald.

Oswald is very much in love in this cartoon: in its most astonishing segment, the shot of Oswald kissing his girlfriend goodbye dissolves into a shot of Oswald kissing a photograph of his girlfriend, as he sits in a World War I-style trench, with rain pouring down around him.

There’s a good touch of Fleischer-style risqué visual humor that I hadn’t expected to find in a Disney cartoon: as soon as the enormous war cannons fire, they immediately collapse into a flaccid state.

Most of the cartoon is taken up by an aerial battle between Oswald and an enemy combatant, each piloting a plane; once again, Disney has cast a mouse as the bad guy.

At this cartoon’s end Oswald is reduced to what looks like shrapnel by a cannonball. His girlfriend, serving as a nurse, sweeps up Oswald’s remains, pours them into a giant shaker, as if she were mixing a drink, and pours out a pool of black ink, which (in the manner of Koko in the Inkwell cartoons) takes form as Oswald. Thus Oswald undergoes death and resurrection, and he gets the girl!

Walt Disney and his principal animators came from Kansas City, and the early Mickey cartoons have rural or barnyard settings. So it’s not a surprise that the next Oswald cartoon teams the rabbit with a cow, but the title character of The Mechanical Cow (1927) is, inexplicably, also a robot! Can we see the seeds of Disney’s future interest in audio-animatronics here? The flaccid cannon joke is repeated here, and Oswald again has a rabbit girlfriend, who is abducted by the bad guys.

In this cartoon the bad guys are ultimately devoured by sharks. I suppose that, considering that characters can survive dismemberment and beheading in the silent Disney cartoons, we shouldn’t take deaths in them seriously. Still, the Alice and Oswald cartoons certainly operate on a harsh moral code.

In The Ocean Hop (1927) Oswald competes against Putrid Pete, with top hat and peg leg, and others in an airplane race across the Atlantic. This updates the theme from Alice’s Balloon Race while probably alluding to Charles Lindbergh’s groundbreaking transatlantic flight, which also inspired the later Mickey Mouse cartoon Plane Crazy. Putrid Pete uses chewing gum to glue Oswald’s plane to the runway so it can’t take off. Instead, Oswald and some mice–friendly ones, this time–turn an unusually long dachshund into a substitute plane, utilizing balloons to lift him into the air. In another Felix-style gag, Oswald uses a word balloon containing a question mark as one of the balloons, employing the question mark to hook it onto the dachshund. (This is a more elaborate version of a similar flying dachshund gag from Alice’s Balloon Race.)

In the best moment of this film, a title card announces, “Then Night Falls,” and we see huge black raindrops falling around Oswald’s plane, which then merge into a sort of black sea of night. This has nothing to do with how night falls in the real world, but it makes a lovely alternative.

At the end Oswald falls from the sky to land safely in Paris, where he looks distinctly uncomfortable as Frenchmen congratulate him by kissing him on the cheek. Was Disney hinting at homosexuality here?

In All Wet (1927), set at the beach, Disney tries an interesting experiment with Oswald’s leading lady. Usually Oswald’s girlfriends, who are sometimes rabbits and sometimes, strangely, cats, are flat-chested; lacking breasts, they tend to go topless, like the early Minnie Mouse. What identifies them as female are things like hats with flowers or skirts and even visible panties. But the lady rabbit in All Wet not only wears a dress but is drawn with the suggestion of a bust. Indeed, at one point in the cartoon, she hides from the camera in order to change from her dress into a one-piece swimsuit. She even strikes flirtatious poses. She’s by no means built like a Jessica Rabbit or even Betty Boop, but she’s certainly preferable to the androgynous female leads of so many early cartoons.

Trying to impress her, Oswald bribes (!) the lifeguard into letting him substitute for him; she rows out to sea and feigns distress, but ends up in real danger. In a clever sequence, Oswald and the girl rabbit are continually being separated as waves lift him or her high up out of the other’s reach. But the girl rabbit seems less than real when Oswald, in giving her artificial respiration, rolls up her body and legs, as if she were a rug!

The Rival Romeos (1927) are Oswald and Putrid Pete, this time without a peg leg. Early Fleischer cartoons depict a world in which everything could be alive and mobile. The silent Disney cartoons in this set generally steer away from this approach, but in Rival Romeos Oswald and Putrid Pete drive cars with faces and personalities. Putrid Pete’s car refuses to drive into mud, and Oswald’s car joins Oswald in laughing at Pete.

With the opening of Bright Lights (1928), Disney and his team are obviously setting themselves new visual challenges and meeting them. This short opens with an animated version of an electric sign such as one might have seen in Times Square, with dancing stick figures, advertising “Mlle. Zulu, shimmy queen,” an exotic dancer. Then we go inside the theater to find yet another example of a conductor in classic animation, this time an ape leading an animal orchestra. There’s a chorus line of scantily clad dancing girl cats, followed by Mlle. Zulu herself, who performs her shimmy dance in an impressively animated serpentine manner.

All of this is before Oswald even makes his entrance. When he does, Oswald proceeds to demonstrate his growing range as an animated actor. His heart bulges from his chest as he thinks about the sensuous Mlle. Zulu, and he grows embarrassed when he unconsciously rests his hand on the derriere of a poster image of Mlle. Zulu, which then angrily comes to life.

Though Oswald’s personality grows fuller and more believable, the characters bodies remain unbelievably malleable. A theater guard hits Oswald so hard that he turns into a mass of tiny Oswalds, which merge back into the full size version; this is a recurring gag in the Oswald series. Oswald retaliates by tying the guard’s legs around a lamppost, as if he were made of rubber. I also like the clever bit in which Oswald tries to sneak into the theater by hiding under a patron’s enormous shadow as if it were a carpet.

With Ozzie of the Mounted (1928) Disney shows ambition as a storyteller by moving away from familiar rural and urban settings into the Canadian wilderness, parodying the same tales of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police that later served as fodder for Jay Ward’s Dudley Do-Right. In this cartoon the familiar furry villain in the top hat is identified as Putrid Pete alias Kid Pete alias Peg Leg Pete, a name later given to Mickey Mouse’s feline adversary. Oswald’s horse is another robot, although why Disney was so interested in mechanical farm animals remains a mystery.

My favorite of the Oswald cartoons in this set is Oh What a Knight (1928). On the commentary track Leonard Maltin and Mark Kausler suggest that this is a parody of Douglas Fairbanks’ Robin Hood (1923), which makes sense since the early, adventurous Mickey has also been compared to Fairbanks. So Oh What a Knight is a parody of the swashbuckler genre in film, with Oswald as a kind of heroic singing troubadour: we can’t hear him sing, but there are plenty of musical notes drawn on screen, as Oswald makes his entrance, singing, while his donkey dances along. Robert Israel, a veteran composer of scores for silent films on video, created the musical accompaniment for the Oswald cartoons. I’m especially pleased that he sets Oswald’s singing entrance in Oh What a Knight to music from Richard Wagner’s Die Meistersinger von Nurnberg, which deals with medieval singers. Later in the cartoon, Israel quotes from Tannhauser, another Wagner opera about a singing knight (and possibly Israel’s nod to Chuck Jones’s What’s Opera, Doc?, which extensively uses music from Tannhauser).

It’s been two decades since I saw Fairbanks’ Robin Hood, but the most astounding segment in Oh What a Knight reminds me of Errol Flynn’s much more familiar The Adventures of Robin Hood (1938), co-directed by Michael Curtiz, which was made a full decade after this cartoon. Both the Flynn Robin Hood and Curtiz’s The Sea Hawk (1940) culminate with swordfights in which the combatants cast enormous shadows on the walks behind them. Was this a swashbuckler movie tradition that predated Curtiz’s films? For, lo, in the greatest segment of Oh What a Knight, Oswald and an armored Putrid Pete wage a swordfight complete with ominous shadows behind them. Moreover, at one point Oswald exits the battle to go kiss the leading lady, while his shadow continues the duel with Putrid Pete in his place!

As the cartoon’s commentary track says, Oswald “recharges” his energies during the battle by continually returning to his lady love for a kiss. In this cartoon and some others, Oswald’s leading lady is not a rabbit but a cat. It would seem strange if Mickey Mouse’s girlfriend were not also a mouse, but then again, in more recent times Kermit the Frog and Miss Piggy have gotten away with interspecies romance. I like the way that Disney and his animators kept devising new ways in these cartoons to portray Oswald’s sexual arousal. For example, at one point in Knight, his leading lady’s kiss causes Oswald’s feet to rotate in ecstasy.

Like Bright Lights, Sky Scrappers (1928) places Oswald in a then-contemporary urban setting: a skyscraper under construction. Putrid Pete sexually harasses Oswald’s girlfriend, a female cat, leading to an energetically staged battle between Oswald and Pete on a girder suspended high above the ground. Still, the cartoon disappointingly fails to evoke the suspense of the live action “thrill comedies” with similar settings that surely inspired it, like Harold Lloyd’s Never Weaken (1921) and Safety Last (1923) or Laurel and Hardy’s later Liberty (1929). It certainly pales in comparison to the split second timing of Popeye and company sleepwalking on and off girders in A Dream Walking (1934), whose complex visual choreography and split second timing was presumably beyond the capability of animators in the 1920s. The main problem, though, is that there’ not enough sense of potential sense of danger from falling in Sky Scrappers. At one point Oswald, climbing a rope, falls several stories, squashes on impact, but immediately resumes normal form, seemingly feeling no pain. He’s so rubbery that if he fell off the girder, one wouldn’t be surprised if he bounced.

The Fox Chase (1928) is another example of misjudging audience sympathies. Surely the audience would side not with Oswald the fox hunter but with his intended victim, the clever fox who outwits him. This fox is not only a trickster but a shapeshifter, adopting a disguise in the cartoon’s final moments that thwarts his hunters once and for all. In the high point here, Oswald tries to drive the fox out of a log by rolling it up like a rug–or like his leading lady from All Wet.

The last Oswald short, Tall Timber (1928), utilizes another ambitious setting, opening with Oswald rowing a canoe down a river, past a wilderness, down waterfall and, excitingly, through rapids. This time Oswald is a duck hunter, but, once again, I found my sympathies going to the duck. But then the cartoon resumes thrill comedy mode. Oswald finds himself riding a moose and being catapulted towards the screen–and the audience–until his face fills the frame. Then Oswald flees from an onrushing, rolling boulder, which finally, literally flattens him against a tree. The result is that Oswald is literally rail thin, but far taller. Oswald tries to restore his true shape by hitting himself with another heavy rock, but this impact distorts his body to the opposite extreme. An amazingly weird closeup shows Oswald’s head, inflated like a balloon. In long shot Oswald now looks short and obese, and his ears are no longer long but rounded: in fact, he looks like a fat Mickey Mouse! Two bear cubs seize either end of Oswald and pull, finally causing the rubbery rabbit to snap back to normal shape. Nevertheless angry, Oswald pursues the bear cubs to what looks like an immense black rock, but proves to be their huge, ferocious mother. But after an offscreen battle in a cave, the mother bear flees, with a furless body in bra and panties (yet another of the various animal “nudity” gags in the Oswald series that falls flat). Oswald then reenters, wearing a resplendent fur coat; he dons a top hat and lights a cigar in triumph. That seems an appropriate final image for what amounts to his curtain call in this final Oswald cartoon.

On the second disc are three key cartoons, animated by Ub Iwerks, that Walt Disney made independently, after Universal took Oswald away from him. They include the Mickey Mouse cartoons, Plane Crazy (1928) and Steamboat Willie (1928). The opening credits for each cartoon call it “a Walt Disney comic by Ub Iwerks,” a description that’s interesting for two reasons. First, the phrasing indicates that Walt Disney was in charge, but that Iwerks was the actual hands-on creator of the film. Second, the phrase “Walt Disney comic” suggests that at this point Disney–and perhaps his audience, as well– regarded the animated cartoon as a cinematic kind of comic strip, rather than as a separate artform.

Plane Crazy was the first Mickey Mouse cartoon that Disney made, and it was originally created as a silent cartoon. But it was the third Mickey cartoon, Steamboat Willie, with its groundbreaking synchronized sound track of music, dialogue and sound effects, that was the first to be released. But watching Plane Crazy, I found myself thinking that even apart from the question of sound, it was a good thing that Mickey actually made his debut in Steamboat Willie instead.

Opening in a barnyard, Plane Crazy presents Mickey as rural rodent who, with hep from other animals, builds his own plane and models himself after Charles Lindbergh, the first pilot to fly solo across the Atlantic. (We even see a surprisingly realistic picture of Lindbergh in the film, which sharply contrasts with the “cartoony” style in which the animal characters are drawn; Mickey even musses his hair in imitation of Lindbergh’s.) Mickey invites Minnie Mouse to join him on his flight. Eventually Mickey starts flirting with her and puts his arm around her; she wags her finger and tells him no. Looking devilish, Mickey speeds up the plane and puts it through aerial maneuvers that frighten Minnie. then he forcibly kisses her, Minnie slaps his face and she jumps out of the plane to escape him, her skirt billowing into a makeshift parachute. In other words, Plane Crazy portrays Mickey Mouse as guilty of sexual harassment, acting no differently than Putrid Pete in Sky Scrappers!

Watching Steamboat Willie after the Oswalds, I realized that much of the first half of the cartoon and its final scenes is conventional for its time, nowhere nearly as inspired as the best of Felix, Inkwell and Oswald. Mickey is the pilot of a steamboat, and his boss is an enormous cat with a high hat, an early version of his archfoe Black Pete (whom we can now see as Putrid Pete’s descendant). The bullying Pete pulls Mickey’s body, as malleable as Oswald’s, out of shape, stretching it till Mickey’s midsection looks like a rubber hose. There’s some vulgar comedy business with Pete spitting. Too late to board the steamboat, Minnie runs alongside it until Mickey uses a winch and hook to lift hold of her panties, a rather demeaning way to treat the leading lady, and deposit her on the boat. At the end of the cartoon Pete forces Mickey to peel potatoes, a parrot laughs mockingly at the mouse, and Mickey gets angry, beans the parrot with at grown potato, and laughs. This material seems all too conventional. sometimes crass and even mean-spirited.

But the opening image of Mickey at the wheel of the steamboat shows why Steamboat Willie fired the public imagination. Mickey is smiling, happy, and whistles a tune we hear on the soundtrack. It’s not just the fact that Steamboat Willie had synchronized sound that made it a breakthrough: it’s the way that Disney adapted his characterizations and stories to the opportunities that music provided. By making music, either by whistling or by playing his improvised instruments later in the cartoon, Mickey becomes a source of pure joy.

The middle of the cartoon has no story: it’s just Mickey playing his instruments, whether they are spoons and pots or various animals. For example, the musical sequence begins when a goat eats the sheet music for “Turkey in the Straw”; Mickey discovers that by turning the goat’s tail like a crank, the goat becomes a living gramophone, with the music coming from his mouth. Steamboat Willie has incurred criticism for Mickey’s supposed sadism, pulling a cat’s tail, or stretching a goose’s neck, or, startlingly, pressing a female pig’s udders in order to produce musical sounds. But in the context of the Oswald cartoons, in which characters’ rubbery bodies rarely sustain any harm, this doesn’t seem so bad to me. Presumably viewers in the 1920s would accept the convention of the period’s cartoons that these animals are not really being hurt. Instead, the audience would be carried along by the music Mickey is playing with these animals, in an effect that is simultaneously comedic and pleasurable simply as music. The cartoon’s ending, with the reversion to expressions of violent anger, is a letdown: it would have been better had Steamboat Willie ended with a musical gag of some sort. It’s Mickey the music maker who first won audience’s hearts.

The final cartoon in this DVD set is The Skeleton Dance (1929), animated by Ub Iwerks, the first of Disney’s Silly Symphonies series. This cartoon is a little masterpiece even though it has no actual story. Whereas the “Turkey in the Straw” segment in Steamboat Willie was an extended interlude between more conventional story sequences, The Skeleton Dance is entirely founded on music. The cartoon begins as a sort of visual tone poem, establishing an eerie mood both through the music and through classic visual elements from horror tales: lightning, the ominous eyes of an owl, a seemingly deserted church and graveyard, a howling dog (who looks like Pluto in silhouette!), and flying bats. Soon the cartoon introduces notes of humor as well, with black cats battling by pulling each other’s noses as if they were rubber bands. This reversion to Oswald-style visual humor is abruptly interrupted when a skeleton looms from behind a tombstone separating the cats and then leaps directly at the “camera,” invading the viewer’s space. Four skeletons then begin their dance, which takes up the rest of the cartoon, sometimes entertainingly silly, sometimes macabre, sometimes both at once.

The success of The Skeleton Dance led to Disney’s long series of Silly Symphonies which were built around music, frequently classical music. I’ve written about a number of Silly Symphonies before after seeing them at Lincoln Center (see “Comics in Context” #136: “Before There Were Cars”). Last December I attended the Museum of the Moving Image’s four-part retrospective of Silly Symphonies, including The Skeleton Dance and demonstrating how Disney further developed his new invention, the musical cartoon, but that is a topic for a future installment.

–Copyright 2008 Peter Sanderson

The Greatest Movie Blog Of All Time: No Joke

Filed under: Columns,The Greatest Movie Blog of All Time — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:49 pm

greatestmovieblog.jpg

It’s No Joke

When I first heard that Heath Ledger would be playing The Joker in the upcoming Batman movie, “The Dark Knight” I was less than thrilled. He seemed too serious, his voice was too deep, too grounded, too brawny. To me this wasn’t ideal casting for a character we’ve often thought of as lanky, psychotic, and with a high-pitched giggle. Really? Ennis Del Mar is the Joker? I didn’t see. Then I saw the trailer and realized I knew nothing and Christopher Nolan knew everything. In those 2 ½ minutes Ledger’s Joker was everything I thought he wouldn’t be and more. And that was just 2 ½ minutes! I was stoked (and still am).

ledger.jpg

This week Heath Ledger gave us a reason to be so serious.

Last Tuesday afternoon, on the day the Oscar nominations were announced, the man who I was now eagerly awaiting to see play the clown prince of crime was found dead in his NYC apartment. He was only 28 years old.

I’ll admit it the first thing that popped into my head was what a cruel publicity campaign Warner’s was trying to run. Now I wish that had been true. He was truly becoming a master of his craft. He was just beginning to produce some truly remarkable work. Sadly, thats all gone now. And more importantly, a family has lost a father and a son.

Warner’s has said that all of Ledger’s work on “The Dark Knight” was completed before his death. So come July we’ll all get to enjoy his complete performance and try to forget that it was his last. Life is sadly temporary, but film is immortal. My thoughts go out to his friends and family. He will be missed.

The 2007 Oscar Nominations

As I said above, the Oscar nominations came out last Tuesday. I can’t say I’m surprised by any of the nominations. Two of my favorite films of 2007, “Gone Baby Gone” and “Charlie Wilson’s War”, only managed get 1 nomination each (well deserved supporting nods for Amy Ryan and Philip Seymour Hoffman). “300” was shut out completely (a film I would’ve thought would be a shoo-in for technical awards at the very least).

But none of it truly bothers me. I still dig the movies I put on my top 10 list and stand by them. The Academy Awards are a very political process because studios believe that an Oscar nomination gives their film credibility (“Transformers” got three nominations, by the way). Nominations and awards are stamped onto DVD packaging so the average consumer will be “informed” as to what are the “good” movies. It’s ridiculous.

prime

Star of a 3-time Oscar nominated film.

Steven Spielberg didn’t win a Best Director award until 1993. Martin Scorsese got his first last year. Alfred Hitchcock never won an award for one of his films (he was given a lifetime achievement award).

It’s impossible to choose one great film over another as being the best (or one actor or actress, or one screenplay, and so on). Some years, one film or performance truly does stand above the rest but most years there are easily a half dozen films that are all on the same level. Just because your favorite film of the year wasn’t nominated for an award doesn’t mean it wasn’t a good film. It entertained the hell out of you, didn’t it? That should be success enough for you. Besides, might not even be an Academy Awards show this year.

The Room

Onto the lighter side of things. There’s an odd phenomenon going on at the Sunset 5 theaters here in LA on the last Saturday of every month. At midnight, one of their theaters is packed for this little (and quiet terrible) movie called, “The Room” which was made in 2003. I set out in a rare Los Angeles monsoon to give it a look.

Make no mistake, this movie is AWFUL. A true vanity project for writer-director-star Tommy Wiseau. Wiseau plays Johnny, a creepy looking guy with long black hair and pale skin whose fiancee Lisa cheats on him. Plot elements and characters come out of left field. The dialogue is cringingly bad, the performances even worse. Wiseau’s Johnny looks easily 20 years older than his costars and appears sedated through most of the movie. It’s misogynistic. It’s discombobulated. It’s often out of focus. I’ve rarely had a better time watching a movie.

This is a rare film that you HAVE to see it in a crowded theater. It’s an experience where shouting at the screen is downright encouraged (don’t worry, you won’t miss any crucial plot twists, there aren’t any). Most of the loyal fans have seen the movie dozens of times. They shout out lines, point out obvious plot holes, and inexplicably throw plastic spoons in the air. And they cheer from the moment the film starts and stay right through the end credits. It’s really a great time.

All the best.

(and Godspeed, Heath).

–Brett Deacon has spent much of his spare time this week in Los Angeles lining up animals two by two.

Toy Box: Masters of the Universe – King Randor Classic Colors

Filed under: Columns,Toy Box — admin @ 12:45 pm

toybox.jpg

NECA and the Four Horsemen have been producing the very cool series of ‘staction’ figures (better known as ‘statues’) based on the Masters of the Universe line for the past few years. In 2005 at Comic-Con, they had an exclusive of King Randor. Those sold out long, long ago, but now Action Figure Express has a slight variant called the Classic Colors version.

Along with slightly different paint (in a 1980’s scheme), there’s a new head sculpt, new cape, and new shield accessory! This is much more than the usual repaint variant, with plenty to make it unique. It’s a limited edition of 2500, and is $30.

If you have any questions, drop me a line at mwc@mwctoys.com, or swing by and check out my website at mwctoys.com. Now on to the review!

NECA Masters of the Universe King Randor exclusive statue

toybox_012908_1.jpg

Packaging – **1/2
Unlike the regular release ‘stactions’ which came carded, these come in a box. The styrofoam insert is one of the annoying ones though. You know, the type with the soft big chunk styrofoam that falls apart when you try to pull it out of the box and makes a mess all over the carpet that requires a Dyson to get out. But at least it keeps him safe til you do pull him out!

toybox_012908_2.jpg

Sculpting – ****
As usual, the sculpting is top notch. The Four Horsemen do an outstanding job on this series, and this one is no different.

The new head sculpt looks good, with some very nice detail work. The battle damaged shield looks terrific, and the new cape has actual fur! Yes, it’s fake real fur, but it’s certainly unique. He might shed a bit more than the normal statue, but he makes up for it by looking far more realistic.

toybox_012908_3.jpg

The stance and pose are dynamic enough to be interesting, but aren’t over done or extreme. He’s done in a 6″ scale, and looks terrific with the other figures released previously in the series.

Paint – ***1/2
The paint isn’t quite as nice as the excellent sculpt, but it’s close. These are quite well done for the price point.

There’s a bit of a slip up around the beard on mine, where the hair line isn’t quite as clean as it should be, but considering the $30 price, I’m not complaining too much. The 80’s colors are pretty cool, and he sports a nice combination of flat and gloss finishes to give the impression of different materials.

toybox_012908_4.jpg

Accessories – ***
Oddly enough, he’s a statue with accessories. The sword, shield and base are all removable.

The base fits in with the rest of the line, sporting a similar design. His feet fit well on the pegs, and there’s no danger of him toppling over under normal circumstances. The bases are a little dull, but they do make sense in the context of the series.

toybox_012908_5.jpg

The sword fits easily in the left hand, while the shield attachs to the wrist of the right. The sculpts and paint on both are in line with the rest of the statue.

Value – ***
Statues, even 6″ statues, don’t cost $30. Compare these to the similarly styled Batman Black and White statues from DC Direct, which cost $45 – $55 a pop, and you can see what I mean. And this guy even has a fuzzy cape!

toybox_012908_6.jpg

Things To Watch Out For –
Not much. Take your time putting the feet on the base, just to make sure you don’t chip anything.

Overall – ***1/2
Had the paint been just a hair better (pun intended), this guy would have hit the four stars. I really do like the MOTU stactions, even not being a huge MOTU guy. Fans of the 80’s show will appreciate this repainted King Randor, and I’d suggest picking it up while you can. These will be statues that folks will wish they’d picked up a few years down the road.

Where to Buy –
This is a limited edition exclusive to Action Figure Express, so that’s your best bet right now.

Related Links –
I have a few other reviews of past MOTU Stactions:

– this guest review covered the series 5 figures, while this one covers series 2, and this one on series 1.

Win AQUA TEEN HUNGER FORCE on DVD!

Filed under: Contests — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:32 pm

We’re giving away, in conjunction with Warner Bros. Home Video, three (3) copies of AQUA TEEN HUNGER FORCE: SEASON 5 on DVD.

Contest ends at midnight EST on Tuesday, February 5th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of Quick Stop Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Tuesday, February 5th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

Quick Stop Thingamabobs: 1/29/2008

Filed under: Columns,Thingamabobs — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:14 pm

thingamabobs.jpg

The web. It’s a big place, full of plenty of distractions ““ some funny, some informative, some ludicrous, some disturbing, some inane, some profound. Each and every weekday, we present links to a few of our favorite finds”¦

————————————————

  • Today, we’ve got Donald Duck Tuesday… Starting with Donald & his nephews in “Sea Scouts”… (Thingamabob)

January 28, 2008

The Fred Hembeck Show: Episode 103 – Once Bitten

Filed under: The Fred Hembeck Show — UncaScroogeMcD @ 2:02 am

fredhembeckheader.jpg

hembeck2007-12-17-01.gif

hembeck2007-12-17-02.gif

hembeck2007-12-17-03.gif

hembeck2007-12-17-04.gif

hembeck2007-12-17-05.gif

hembeck2007-12-17-06.gif

hembeck2007-12-17-07.gif

hembeck2007-12-17-08.gif

hembeck2007-12-17-09.gif

hembeck2007-12-17-10.gif

hembeck2007-12-17-11.gif

hembeck2007-12-17-12.gif

hembeck2007-12-17-13.gif

hembeck2007-12-17-14.gif

hembeck2007-12-17-15.gif

hembeck2007-12-17-16.gif

hembeck2007-12-17-17.gif

hembeck2007-12-17-18.gif

hembeck2007-12-17-19.gif

hembeck2007-12-17-20.gif

hembeck2007-12-17-21.gif

hembeck2007-12-17-22.gif

hembeck2007-12-17-23.gif

hembeck2007-12-17-24.gif

Today’s episode was for all you folks who’ve said, “The Fred Hembeck Show sucks!!”. Yes, this time around it did. Well, at least, it pretended to…

Now, about those links mentioned above. If you want to know more about the impending Image Comics’ publication, The Nearly Complete Essential Hembeck Archives Omnibus – including how to get either a simple autographed copy or one with my signature AND a custom drawing!–just use that link! And as always, check out my blog, Fred Sez, or my whole gosh darn website, Hembeck.com!! And before you know it, we’ll see you all back here at the Quick Stop corral!
–Copyright 2008 Fred Hembeck

Win THE INVASION on DVD!

Filed under: Contests — UncaScroogeMcD @ 1:06 am

We’re giving away, in conjunction with Warner Bros. Home Video, two (2) copies of THE INVASION on DVD.

Contest ends at midnight EST on Monday, February 4th.

CLOSED! THANKS FOR ENTERING!

Official Rules

No member of Quick Stop Entertainment or their immediate families may enter.

No Purchase necessary to win.

Must be 18 years of age or older to enter.

All submitted entries must be received by 11:59pm EST on Monday, February 4th.

The winner must allow 4-6 weeks after notification of win to receive the product.

Quick Stop Thingamabobs: 1/28/2008

Filed under: Columns,Thingamabobs — UncaScroogeMcD @ 12:54 am

thingamabobs.jpg

The web. It’s a big place, full of plenty of distractions ““ some funny, some informative, some ludicrous, some disturbing, some inane, some profound. Each and every weekday, we present links to a few of our favorite finds”¦

————————————————

  • What the hell… Let’s make it Gonzo Monday, starting with some dancing cheese… (Thingamabob)
  • I’m Going To Go Back There Someday… (Thingamabob)

January 25, 2008

Trailer Park: THE HOLLYWOOD REPORTER’s James Greenberg Seems To Have No Problem With Polanski’s Pedophilia

Filed under: Columns,Trailer Park — admin @ 3:59 am

By Christopher Stipp

Archives? Right Here…

I’m awesome. I wrote a book. It’s got little to do with movies. Download and read “Thank You, Goodnight” right HERE for free.

There is little I take contention with when people talk about what’s on their minds.

I appreciate that we live in a country where people can say what they want and not fear that their government will put them in jail or, worse yet, put them to death for expressing themselves. However, James Greenberg of the Hollywood Reporter is genuinely testing my tolerance for ignorant, stupid, misinformed, shallow and despicable scribblings. How one person can be given a platform where he can can say that Roman Polanski has done his time by having to leave this country, fleeing his rightful (however of a gross miscarriage of justice one person thinks has happened to another) conviction for having sex with a minor.

I wanted this to be a column about a film that’s rocking the Sundance boat, ROMAN POLANSKI: WANTED AND DESIRED, how it was nice that there was a documentary out there that explored the effects of media attention and the way in which justice is meted out. No one would argue the effects of this during the O.J. Simpson case in the 90’s where prime time punditry, media spotlights, the legal system and the insatiable need some have for celebrity caused such a hallmark for academics who are still discussing its effects today.

Even though I haven’t seen this film I have read that filmmaker Marina Zenovich’s documentary opens on the predatory pedophile who, as Yahoo! reports, is shown in archival footage talking about his predilection for really young girls. I initially thought this would be an excellent story about someone has finally taken the time to examine the way the justice system and media have coalesced in this odd amalgam of the saying “separate but equal” with regard to people getting a fair trial but then I read what James Greenberg had to say about the film’s message. And, to my satisfaction, he takes an admirably tough peek at what the film’s thrust actually is but then the guy has to say this:

Most people remember that Polanski left the country, but few know why and under what circumstances. “Wanted and Desired” finally sets the record straight, and, if there is any justice in the world, Polanski will be allowed to return to this country not as a pariah but as someone who made a mistake and has more than paid for it.

What fucking country do you live in James where it’s OK to have sex with a little girl and, all you have to do to be absolved of it, is to leave the country for a while without ever having to step into a prison to atone for the crime? Better yet, you ignorant asshole, how about you stop thinking like a media whore who thinks that because this guy had a media circus to deal with but then fled like the pussy he is because he knew he was going to jail where, if I’m not mistaken, they don’t look too kindly on men who pump and dump into little kids that he has “more than paid for it”? No, that would be asking too much because even though his victim has long since reconciled the event in her life and, because of that, there should be a de facto kind of settlement between the rapist and his victim it I am sure you would be better served getting the opinion of the many women’s organizations whose sole mission is to help young women deal with traumatic events like this, some of whom never get over it. I believe a lot of these groups would love to be able and sit you down to talk you about how twisted and poor your thought process is if you were to hear the stories of other women who might of had this happen if only once in their lives.

I get it.

You’re willing to look past this monster’s past in order to have this human reject grace the soil of America as a free man. I wish I could say something else about the kind of life he’s been allowed to live “in exile” but there is a problem with your flawed, broken logic: he’s never served his time. He’s been allowed to roam free all these years, living the kind of life those who are convicted sex offenders never get the chance to do because they don’t have well-heeled friends help then ESCAPE this country. I may think I’m getting a raw deal if I’m famous and am being treated too harshly but, if I’m not mistaken, having the book thrown at you only means that any and all things you can rightfully be charged with are applied; they’re not making up shit.

I could go on and on about how utterly shitty your 2nd grade logic is by comparing rape of a 13 year-old is to a “mistake” but it’s obvious that even if you are the parent of little girls I weep for their fate if any of them are dealt the same fate as Samantha Geimer. I think you wouldn’t be calling it a “mistake” but calling it for what it was: rape.

You, along with a lot of other critical eggheads who love Polanski’s work without weighing this aspect of his life fairly, are what’s truly amazing about this country. I may not like what you have to say but it’s a delight that you are allowed to speak your mind without the repercussions if you were to say these things in a country where they actually do care about the safety and welfare of their women.

Soooo….I heard the U2-3D film is all sorts of awesome.

You may not like the Messiah Bono but I have read review after review extolling this movie’s immersing sensation. I happen to be a marginally big U2 fan but I understand where someone might get the notion that Bono needs a little throttling every now and then. I happen to also understand when you’ve got to look at something like this as an opportunity to see this movie as a step forward in movie going and it could make the argument as to what it would take to get people back into the theater.

New opportunities.

Few know and even less care but I have been listening to some of the comments below (Yes, you can now publicly call me out if you’d like to. I’m an equal opportunity offender) and some of the e-mail I’ve received about the deluge of interviews I’ve been doing in lieu of the trailer column here. As an aside, really, of all those I’ve come in contact with who wield some kind of power at the various studios or PR houses, no one really seems to care that I have been doing this now for over 4 years.

I have been approached where all I’m needed to do is churn out interviews (1 a month or so) with directors, writers and/or actors. The best part is that it’s for the writer of Fight Club’s Chuck Palahniuk’s web site, The Cult.

This not only represents more work I’ll be doing on the side when not properly employed at my day job but it’ll also mark the chance for me to finally be writing for the same site as Joshua Jabcuga, writer extraordinaire of the latest and greatest Scarface graphic novel “Scarface: Devil in Disguise” from IDW, and again represents the chance for the Wonder Twins to churn out some of the greatest milquetoast writing since the days of MoviePoopShoot.com.

This is truly a blessing to be a part of a site which is owned by the kung-fu master of explosive, focused fiction and I hope it shows you how multi-faceted my musings actually are; at the very least I hope you don’t think it sucks.

Have you seen the slow build-up for Sam Rockwell’s CHOKE? You should. I hope to bring you something big out of it.

SPEED RACER (2008)

Director: Andy Wachowski, Larry Wachowki
Cast:
Emile Hirsch, Christina Ricci, John Goodman, Susan Sarandon, Matthew Fox, Hiroyuki Sanada, Richard Roundtree, Ji Hoon Jung (aka “Rain”)
Release: May 9, 2008
Synopsis:
Born to race cars, Speed Racer (Emile Hirsch) is aggressive, instinctive and, most of all, fearless. His only real competition is the memory of the brother he idolized – the legendary Rex Racer, whose death in a race has left behind a legacy that Speed is driven to fulfill. Speed is loyal to the family racing business, led by his father, Pops Racer (John Goodman), the designer of Speed’s thundering Mach 5. When Speed turns down a lucrative and tempting offer from Royalton Industries, he not only infuriates the company’s maniacal owner (Roger Allam) but uncovers a terrible secret – some of the biggest races are being fixed by a handful of ruthless moguls who manipulate the top drivers to boost profits. If Speed won’t drive for Royalton, Royalton will see to it that the Mach 5 never crosses another finish line. The only way for Speed to save his family’s business and the sport he loves is to beat Royalton at his own game. With the support of his family and his loyal girlfriend, Trixie (Christina Ricci), Speed teams with his one-time rival – the mysterious Racer X (Matthew Fox) – to win the race that had taken his brother’s life: the death-defying, cross-country rally known as The Crucible.

View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Negative. If you’ve got LSD, take it, and if you have an epileptic sensitivity to flashing lights look away now.

I am really unable to put into words just how this movie breathes by itself but this film definitely has its own style, I will give it that. There’s a hyper-accelerated, kinetic vibe that just drips off the screen but I am really unsure how that will translate to middle America. I think kids of a certain age will dig this for the most part but, for those of us who are all too familiar with one of the brothers’ erotic predilection for stretched laxtex, there are elements of this trailer that make you scratch your head in wondering why the Wachowski’s don’t tone down their need to inject latent and overt sexuality in their pictures. Of course, I could be wrong but I’d like one person to try and make an opposing viewpoint after seeing Emile Hirsch’s overly tousled locks, his brow spray bottled with a hint of glistening moisture and Matthew Fox’s George Michael inspired facial hair in that black leather.

I almost think this is a promo video for how to become someone’s gimp.

Save that, though, there is an issue of the trailer at hand and who here isn’t a little crazed at the full-tilt CGI of the opening sequences of what looks like the latest racing game for the PS3? The cars looping around on a track that looks cobbled together by someone who was obviously colorblind while putting in the hued pieces of the roadway but I am drawn in. That much I have to concede.

The voiceover that comes over the speakers, the monologue that says our titular hero needs to race, here I’m thinking I wandered in some NASCAR bio pic, but the visuals don’t relent. The flames coming out of the back of Racer’s white Batmobile at the very least feels real, it feels like it’s couched in a land governed by physics.

I do have to roll my eyes by the Superboy curly Q haircut that Hirsch in which Emile says, without irony, that racing is a form of religion for his family. I mean he looks like he is about to cry me a river. Seriously, that curl is about as aggravating as Frank Whaley’s curl in CAREER OPPORTUNITIES; at least John Candy had the brass balls to tell the kid to lose it before working at the local Target.

I dig the baddie in the film that tries to have Speed sign a contract, the shot dissolving in a 360-degree rotation that almost leaves you queasy, but coherent enough to see some of the other cartoon characters that are no doubt racing against our young lad. Ricci, as Speed’s biggest athletic supporter, looks just delicious as Trixie so I do have to, Psh!, high five for that creation.

Really now, Emile’s admission in a breathy, laughable, parlance that this is all he knows how to do is just painful to watch. Thankfully we’re whisked promptly away by the same kind of Matrix hard rockin’ techno which made those films at least listenable but Ricci’s wickedly bright pink outfit, pink headphones and pink seatbelt and pink seats in what is probably a pink helicopter and fake concern for Speed to “move it” is only matched by the wickedly homoerotic fight between Racer X and some masked interloper who’s shirtless (of course”¦).

I just don’t know what to make of the unrelated cut scenes of the racing, the comedic blocking for these people who are supposed to be acting against overly saturated backgrounds and Fox’s overly dramatic line that “if they don’t destroy him first” that is unintentionally hilarious.

I just don’t know about this film’s potential as a viable theatrical vehicle; it’ll probably do well as one of those movies where you recommend to someone by starting out, “Well, first you’ve got to be really high”¦”

KILLER AT LARGE (2008)

Director: Steven Greenstreet
Cast:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Neil LaBute, Mike Huckabee, Walter Cronkite and many many more…
Release: Coming Soon to a festival near you in 2008
Synopsis:
An overview of the politics, social effects and problems associated with the rising epidemic of American obesity.

View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Shockingly Positive. I’m a Kids in the Hall fan. HUGE.

They did one scene where Scott Thompson, Kevin McDonald, Bruce McCulloch and Dave Foley play off one another for a song that’s performed in a restaurant called “Liposuction.” It, perhaps, perfectly encapsulates the issue with what modern obesity is doing to people who cannot stop the need to gorge themselves. Regardless of the health problems, regardless of the problems that it creates, regardless of a person’s likelihood to die from eating a bag full of warm barf from any number of fast food restaurants if done consistently enough there is no stopping this epidemic.

I am perfectly in tune with the focus on the right hand before being socked with the left of this trailer’s opening. I usually frown on this practice from the standpoint that it can sometimes be used as a trailer crutch but it works because of the inclusion of Dr. Richard Carmona, the Surgeon General of the United States. The music is perfectly chosen; it’s genuinely tense and it leads you down a path you think you’re familiar with even though you know there’s the fist just waiting to impale your jaw.

Carmona gives an excellent description of what his daily activities usually are with regard to his dealings with the press corps and how route the practice of giving answers to the populist inquiries of the day. The visuals are just as compelling when you consider what reporters are more inclined to talk about: war, plague, death. The screen fades and we get one statistic.

“In 2006, the U.S. State Department reported that terrorism killed 28 American citizens.”

The left you don’t expect comes as Carmona recounts being asked his opinion on what is on his mind. The answer that comes, and the silence it causes, is telling from the position that you wouldn’t think that Carmona would say “obesity.”

“It’s a terror from within”

The 112,000 people who died from being seriously overweight is telling. What’s more is Carmona’s rhetorical trick in twisting the idea of terrorism and “terrorist killers,” and the mind meld that we all have from events that have seriously shaped our lives since September 11th with the nomenclature we all understand, to ourselves is sharp. The requisite shot of overweight people, no doubt Americans, helps to illustrate his message but it’s something of a needless tactic because if you don’t know that we are the heaviest country on the planet for reasons that are all to easy to understand then you’re probably one of the people in the file footage.

I’m touched by the graphics that show the factual information about how this problem has spread across the country like a virus. The weigh-in, no pun intended, from pundits who have a stake in making people aware of how serious this is can’t be understated but I am telling you I don’t think anything will ever be as effective in putting up a mirror to our culture than the introduction of a 12 year-old girl who is shown getting ready for liposuction.

The paint shaker sound in the background as the doctor explicitly shakes the body of this young, sedated girl to complete this procedure should be nothing less than shocking, depressing and sad.

I could go on to explain what else bookends this trailer but nothing is as effective as seeing the youth of a girl being altered because of not only what she’s done to herself but to a culture that has slowly crept its way towards obesity with open arms and mouths.

Weekend Shopping Guide 1/25/08: All-Starr

Filed under: Shopping Guides — UncaScroogeMcD @ 3:52 am

weekendshopping.jpg

The weekend’s here. You’ve just been paid, and it’s burning a hole in your pocket. What’s a pop culture geek to do? In hopes of steering you in the right direction to blow some of that hard-earned cash, it’s time for the Quick Stop Weekend Shopping Guide – your spotlight on the things you didn’t even know you wanted…

The persnickety relationship between divorcees Oscar & Felix continues in the complete third season of the original Odd Couple (Paramount, Not Rated, DVD-$38.99 SRP), featuring another 23 episodes fully remastered and just as funny as always. This is the season that found the duo arrested and put on trial, and even getting Murray the Cop as a temporary roommate.

blankguide.gif

Long the most artistically underappreciated of the Beatles, I’m tired of people slagging on Ringo Starr. Frankly, his albums have been the most consistently enjoyable and fun. Not every piece of music has to be an artistic opus, and Ringo always comes back to remind us that sometimes you just want a strong backbeat and a sing-along. There’s plenty of that to be found on his new album, Liverpool 8 (Capitol, $18.98 SRP). Also, there’s a very touching tribute track to the equally underappereciated Harry Nilsson, who was a good friend of Ringo’s.

blankguide.gif

Newly remastered and with new bonus materials, the 40th Anniversary Edition of Gerry Anderson’s Thunderbirds (A&E, Not Rated, DVD-$129.95 SRP) rockets onto DVD at a reduced price, in a smaller package, and just as wonderfully kitschy as it’s always been. The 12 disc box-set features all 32 episodes, plus an exclusive pop-up episode, making-of featurettes, an interview with Anderson, and still galleries. Fab!

blankguide.gif

I can give or take the modern colorization process, but I appreciate the fact that it requires an often pristine restoration of the original black & white print. Such is the case with the new 2-disc editions of Ray Harryhausen’s sci-fi classics It Came From Beneath The Sea & Earth Vs The Flying Saucers (Sony, Not Rated, DVD-$24.96 SRP each), which feature both pristine black & white and the colorized versions, plus audio commentaries, featurettes, interviews, and more.

blankguide.gif

As light as a bubble and just as dense intellectually, I admit that the modern teen comedy take on Snow White – Sydney White (Universal, Rated PG-13, DVD-$24.98 SRP) – is watchable only because the oddly effervescent presence of star Amanda Bynes. Bonus features include featurettes, deleted scenes, a gag reel, and more.

blankguide.gif

Things are heating up as story elements begin to come together in the second volume of Avatar: The Last Air Bender – Book 3: Fire (Paramount, Not Rated, DVD-$16.99 SRP) with the invasion of the Fire Nation and the Day of Black Sun. Bonus materials include audio commentaries and a packed-in mini comic.

blankguide.gif

If catching a wave is unreasonable, at the very least you can catch the complete third season of Hawaii Five-O (Paramount, Not Rated, DVD-$49.99 SRP). The 6-disc set features all 24 of Steve McGarrett’s crime-solving adventures in the land of the luau. Bonus features are limited to the original episode promos.

blankguide.gif

It’s been years, but the second season of Barney Miller (Sony, Not Rated, DVD-$29.95 SRP) has finally dropped. The 3-disc set features all 22 episodes from the classic cop comedy’s sophomore outing. If you’ve yet to discover Barney Miller, now the time to pick up both sets.

blankguide.gif

The clever cons of the UK’s Hustle (BBC, Not Rated, DVD-$34.98 SRP) are back with a 4th season and a potential new addition to the team when Mickey Bricks goes on sabbatical. The 6 episodes are full of the usual robbing from the filthy rich to feed themselves, this time including a porn baron, a charity crook, and a nasty nursing home owner – and even make their way to LA and Vegas. The sole bonus feature of the 2-disc set is a behind-the-scenes featurette.

blankguide.gif

Setting action pics aside, Dwayne Johnson (aka The Rock) steps into the family comedy milieu in The Game Plan (Walt Disney, Rated PG, DVD-$29.99 SRP), starring as an egotistical pro footballer living la vida single whose bacchanal gets a dose of cold water when the 8-year-old daughter he never knew existed shows up on the doorstep of his bachelor pad. What follows is inoffensive, affable hijinks and heartwarming developments aplenty. Bonus materials include behind-the-scenes featurettes, bloopers, deleted scenes, and more.

blankguide.gif

If you were expecting the soundtrack to Juno (Rhino, $13.98 SRP) to be a goofy collection of indie tunes, then you’re expectations have been met, as the disc features tracks from Belle & Sebastian, The Moldy Peaches, Antsy Pants, Kimya Dawson, and Cat Power – but there’s also tunes from The Kinks, Sonic Youth, and Buddy Holly.

blankguide.gif

Erudite and dryly, slyly witty, the British TV adaptations of Noel Coward have been brought together in one box via The Noel Coward Collection (BBC, Not Rated, DVD-$79.98 SRP). The 7-disc set features 7 of Coward’s plays, and 6 dramatized short stories. Bonus features include a documentary interview with Coward, additional interviews and performances, radio plays, and more.

blankguide.gif

The next generation of Hong Kong action star arrives in the US in Fatal Contact (Genius, Not Rated, DVD-$24.95 SRP), and that man is Jacky Wu Jing. After watching this tale of a Kung Fu Olympian who finds himself competing in an underworld fighting circuit, I think we may have the next Jet Li on our hands. The 2-disc special edition features an audio commentary, interviews, featurettes, and more.

blankguide.gif

Not nearly the camp nightmare of the second film but not quite the gothic beauty of the comic in its golden period, the first season of Swamp Thing (Shout! Factory, Not Rated, DVD-$39.99 SRP) is still a relatively faithful – and respectful – adaptation of the avenging spirit of the swamp. The first season set contains all 22 episodes, plus exclusive interviews with co-creator Len Wein and actor Dick Durock.

blankguide.gif

As offbeat and passionate as the flick itself, the soundtrack to Wristcutters: A Love Story (Lakeshore Records, $18.98 SRP) features select cues from Bobby Johnston’s score, as well as tracks from Gram Parsons, Gogol Bordello, Artie Shaw, and Joy Division.

blankguide.gif

For the most part, I’ve enjoyed the relaunch of Doctor Who. I think it’s fun science fiction, even if it’s a bit hamfisted and plothole-ridden at times. With that in kind, was looking forward to the spinoff series Torchwood (BBC, Not Rated, DVD-$79.98 SRP), which brought the character of Captain Jack Harkness (John Barrowman) to the forefront as the head of the Cardiff, Wales branch of the super-secret extraterrestrial investigation unit that was formerly a big baddie in the Who-niverse. Think of it as a cross between MI5 and The X-Files with a much more adult slant towards it’s storytelling than Who, which is aimed for a more family-friendly level of storytelling. Unfortunately, in reality, Torchwood wound up being a poorly written, poorly executed mishmash of contrived characters in convoluted, often contradictory stories that lacked any internal logic. It’s like a slow motion trainwreck, stretched across 13 episodes. The only saving grace – and it’s not enough to save the series – is Barrowman, who deserves a much better show than this. Here’s hoping they can pull this out if the pit in series 2. The 7-disc set features all 13 episodes, plus audio commentary, behind-the-scenes featurettes, outtakes, video journals, and deleted scenes.

blankguide.gif

I dig that the soundtrack to the upcoming Mama’s Boy (Lakeshore Records, $18.98 SRP) focuses almost exclusively on a New Wave vibe. What that means is we’ve got The Jam, Scanners, The Rheostatics, Billy Bragg, and Mark Mothersbaugh. Excellent.

blankguide.gif

Finally, if you want to make sure your weekend viewing contains a bit o’ culture, there’s the recent BBC adaptation of Jane Austen’s Persuasion (BBC, Not Rated, DVD-$19.98 SRP), starring Rupert Penry-Jones and Sally Hawkins as starcrossed lovers Frederick Wentworth and Anne Eliott.

blankguide.gif

So there you have it… my humble suggestions for what to watch, listen to, play with, or waste money on this coming weekend. See ya next week…

-Ken Plume

##

« Newer Posts — Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress