?>

Features
Interviews
Columns
Podcasts
Shopping Guides
Production Blogs
Contests
Message Board
RSS Feed
Contact Us
Archives

 

E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | By Christopher Stipp

May 26, 2006

The Game Is Afoot

Um, yeah, MySpace. It’s teh awesome and I’m not even using it to pick up 12 year-olds. Boys. I’m not. For reals.

The summer movie season has begun but the notion of whether it has started real well depends on whether you like to play with your numbers in an optimistic or pessimisttic way. Let’s break down the top 5 films this week at the box office:

The Da Vinci Code: $77,000,000 Budget: $125 Million

Over the Hedge: $37,228,000 Budget: ?

Mission: Impossible III: $11,015,000 Budget: $150 Million

Poseidon: $9,200,000 Budget: $160 Million

RV: $5,100,000 Budget: $50 Million

Now, for those who don’t want to go look for cummulative totals I can tell you that Mission: Impossible still has a good way to go before it hits the 0 mark, the prospect of DVD sales being Paramount’s one salve on the wound that their batshit crazy mouthpiece for the film may have wounded sales just a little bit. I am sure that foriegn audiences will more than help out making the film a profitable venture for the studio but, when compared to POSEIDON’s digits you can certainly see how this is a tougher pill to swallow.

The interesting thing when you compare a movie like THE DA VINCI CODE and POSEIDON is that both of them both received pretty awful reviews. Nay, I say, pretty disasterous reviews. When you see that that both of these flicks came within 4% of one another for an aggregate number of all reviews that either said it was good (which they’re not) or it was bad (which they are and some got very creative with how they put it). So, why the disconnect between DA VINCI’s obvious bulletproofness and POSEIDON’s eventual sinking to the bottom of people’s Must Avoid list? I can’t say for sure as most every single summer movie is constructed with the idea of maximizing company’s coffers and being appealing to the widest audience possible which means diluting the creativity of a project until it reaches a milquetoast consistency from its script to its eventual casting and direction. It’s not a bad thing, mind you, as every company deserves to make as much dinero as it can get its evil little fingers on but I am confounded why one obviously resonated with audiences and the other did not.

I wouldn’t dare go to a film where most every person whose opinions I valued said was a waste of my money but I’m feeling that it was Hanks’ appearance alone that made so many people scoff at critics and willingly open their collective wallets. POSEIDON had no real bankable stars besides Golden Oldies Kurt Russell and Richard Dreyfuss and maybe that’s it, maybe that’s how you can literally make any movie you want, no matter how terrible, and as long as you have someone who can simply show up and make millions of dollars appear right before your corporation’s eyes it could all boil down to not how well your movie’s made but who you’ve got in it.

Could Occam’s Razor theory really that applicable to films? If I was looking just weeks into the Summer movie season I would answer “Yes” simply based on what the trends look like. I am sure that if I really looked hard I could find out if this is a viable notion but next week is already upon us and X-MEN 3 is knocking at the Box Office door wanting to know what a marginal director and a cast of marginally well-received actors can expect from people’s bank accounts.

I’ve already got my slide rule at the ready.

And in this installment of Photo of the Week we get a little sporty with what is, ostensibly, my new wallpaper on the trusty iBook G4; Michael Barrett, catcher of the Chicago Cubs, takes issue with Chicago White Sox’s AJ Pierz-Zzz-something-ski or another. Be it right or not this is what makes being a Superfan of the downtrodden Cubs a nice thing. I may love my movies but I do loves me a good bar fight every once in a while on the field especially one that we start, and win. Remember kids, violence is never the answer but when you’re having your jaw pushed back into your face it’s kinda hard to be asking the question in the first place, isn’t it?


12 AND HOLDING (2005) Director: Michael Cuesta
Cast: Linus Roache, Annabella Sciorra, Jeremy Renner, Jayne Atkinson, Marcia Debonis
Release: May 19, 2006
Synopsis: Explores the complexities of children losing their innocence and adults struggling to guide them. In the suburbs of America, three close knit 12-year-olds ñ introverted Jacob (Conor Donovan), precocious Malee (Zoe Weizenbaum) and vulnerable Leonard (Jesse Camacho) — start down the path of self-discovery.
View Trailer:
* Medium (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Positive. This one is a head scratcher.

You don’t really want to desperately see this movie like you would a SUPERMAN when you see Routh milling around in his tight red Speedo briefs but you feel a certain uneasiness when you try and grasp exactly what it is that’s happening, I’m not sure I do know, though, what it is that I am supposed to be identifying with, a key component in any good grab for one’s attention or cash, but I like it; I appreciate the sentiment that I’m not entirely comfortable by trailer’s end.

While I know that this is not going to be a gleeful romp through this coming-of-age tale you’re instantly drawn into what seems like a rather poignant set-up: identical twins who don’t share much in common and who have a troubled time relating to one another.

We have our collective attention switched to two friends of the twins, one who happens to be fat; and I can’t understand why there needs to always be the fat friend in movies with kids. You need to look no further than most every kid movie and see where there is an obvious chunky collective at work here. I’m not saying it’s as organized as, let’s say, the mafia but there is something afoot. Of course the fat kid is eating in the first scene we’re shown and I am floored by the other friend’s declaration, who happens to be female, that she is now able to be with, and care for, a child.

(Insert surprise here)

This is not going to be Disney’s THE SANDLOT.

So, the quad squad gets themselves a tree house, get into a little tiff with what seems like an ornery kid of East Coast dialect (I mean, really, aren’t all kids with New Yawk accents just thieves-in-training?) threatens to kill one, or all as these East Coasters are just murderous little shiats, and then ends up accidentally killing one of the twins.

The bleakness and quiet that the next moment inspires of seeing the blanketed coffin is disquieting.

After we move on from the death we get an odd theme of sexual awakening by the girl in the trio and then rage by the single twin who confronts the alleged killer while in prison; sex and violence, I guess, like a two birds and a feather. The violence takes the next step as the girl produces something off screen while in a room with the dejected brother but I think we all can safely say it’s a heater of some caliber.

The subsequent montage of clips that don’t really have any adhesion outside of just giving us more opportunities to see these kids’ environment is actually useful here. It’s good for three reasons: 1) The soundtrack is inspired. A modern “Don’t Fear The Reaper” fits in a macabre way. 2) The quotes that this movie has garnered are solid, the film festival locations this has played at are pimped quickly. 3) We actually get an abstract way of relating to these kids’ world. The clips are effective at relaying movement and emotion.

I’m not comfortable when we finally finish things here but that’s commendable. I shouldn’t be after seeing how complex things will get in this flick as Cuesta’s L.I.E. wasn’t a smooth pill to swallow so I shouldn’t be expecting anything less than a story that’s uniquely his own to tell.


CASINO ROYALE (2006) Director: Martin Campbell
Cast: Daniel Craig, Judi Dench
Release: November 17, 2006
Synopsis: James Bond must thwart a dangerous Russian spy from winning a game of cards worth millions.
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Positive. Yes.

This is what this franchise needed.

I don’t purport to know Bond lore any more than I have a handle on the Harry Potter series; it’s not much, I don’t have any interest knowing more than I do and, most importantly, I’m just here for the ride.

However, knowing what I do about 007 and the enduring iconoclast symbol he represents for British folk, as he shatters the notion of all Brits having teeth that could pop open deadbolts and bodies that are pastier than white paint, this is exactly what I’ve come to expect from this kind of film: guns, explosions, chicks who have no other purpose than to be objectified by a Cro-Magnon throwback and fast cars.

And, to wit, give it up for the sly entrance into this trailer. Instead of going the route of blazing through the aforementioned delicious bits that make every Bond film a variation on a theme we get Judi Dench doing the voiceover. Now, even though I had to look up whether her perennial character was named M or Q, again, I don’t have a firm grasp on these things, it’s quite moot because of how wonderfully this thing opens up.

“This may be too much for a blunt instrument to understand…”

I like the mystique that’s being created with the initial black and white scenes that we’re given. Sure, we could have been given that distinctive 007 instrumental suite with Craig walking before shooting the screen with that lame ass blood effect, a calling card that really should be revamped. No, we get something different. The voiceover that Dench does is actually pretty good as, unbeknownst to the dudes who are drawn to these films, it subverts in its own way the established masculine overtones these films are unquestionably all about.

Craig, in slow-mo, beats down dudes in hand-to-hand combat whilst being a patient listener to Dench’s assessment of the kind of operative a 00 should be.

“I understand that 00’s have a very short life expectancy.”

Yes, Craig has it. He’s got that ability to be glib and smarmy while being flirtatious. He’s also has that look of dangerousness. It’s there and as the trailer transitions from black and white to color you see that he’s everything that a disposable Bond should be.

I do have to suffer through the animation of Craig “shooting” the camera but as it’s a device used to accentuate the transition, much like SIN CITY used red in it its initial trailer, and this is where we move from just meeting Craig to seeing him move within the character.

Now, we don’t see a lot of stability for the duration of this teaser but that’s just the nature of these things; especially because people want to get whetted for what’s to come this piece of promotion has to just hint. With the elaborate action sequences shown, the car that will be Craig’s little coupe and the lingering gaze we’re allowed to spend on some faceless woman getting out of the water in a bathing suit I would say this is more than just a satisfactory teaser.


DISTRICT B13 (2006) Director: Pierre Morel
Cast: Cyril Raffaelli, David Belle, Tony D’amario, Bibi Naceri, Dany Verissimo
Release: June 2, 2006
Synopsis: Paris, 2010. An isolation wall surrounds the ghetto cities. Damien is a member of the police elite task force. This time, the government has assigned him the most extreme expedition of his entire career: a weapon of mass destruction has been stolen by the most powerful gang of District B13.
View Trailer:
* Medium (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Postive. Excellent concept but wretched execution.

I would like to think trailers like this serve a purpose beyond just pimping their own films, These are little examples by which to observe and take away little bits of ideas, ways of doing things. Much like in the case for this trailer there is also the opportunity to state what isn’t such a good idea when trying to get people interested to make an effort to see your film.

The idea with the trailer, especially one that is making a voyage beyond its own little borders, is that you want to start people thinking that they have to see it, need to see it. When you use that faux computer screen with the green letters as icons you not only are saying that you still believe people are communicating in Dos and don’t have a basic understanding on how modern GUI interfaces have vastly improved since the Apple IIe but you’re also stating that this story takes place in 2010, thus, rendering your visualization of said computer screen a sad attempt at trying to seem technologically with it.

See, I don’t want to sound harsh as this trailer opens up solidly. You have the sound of a helicopter humming in the audio foreground as you peep the barbwired walls of desolate cement ghettos. Quickly you see that these aren’t desolate areas at all and are filled with many people. You do, though, get acquainted with the kind of police state, a heavily armed police state, that these people are living in.

Black screen, green computer letters: “Paris…2010”

The “ugh” begins as this “harsh” new reality reveals that the streets are run by the rejects from THE FAST AND THE FURIOUS. Driving souped up Yugo’s and the like it appears to be that the gangs who control what happens are about to come into possession of a nuclear weapon.

Now, the cinematography harkens back to the salad days of the first TRANSPORTER and I’m not disappointed to know that the story is explained even further by our green screen companion that “the lone cop…that is sent to stop them…” establishes our protagonist.

I’m confused.

At first I thought we were dealing with just these little gangs in post-apocalyptic France but now we’ve got a French Jason Statham getting buck wild with these perps. I get ready to go absolutely monkey shines on this concept but something quite important changes my mind: we get another protagonist thrown into the mix.

Instead of just one Jason Statham we get two. Not only that but these guys are acrobatic on the level of a Tony Jaa mixed in with those dudes who did those leaping commercials for Nike a couple of years ago; they were French I believe, as well.

The end result has me eating all sorts of crow about how goofy this was getting. The stunts here are just a joy to watch as you try and figure out the logistics of a man running across the vertical façade of a building. We get hipped to the fact that the producers of BOTH TRANSPORTER 2 and ONG-BAK have diddled with this story and like a connoisseur who can tell vintage from swill I feel vindicated by the knowledge that this movie has their kind of fingerprints on the screen.

I do, however, have advice for these people promoting the movie: getting it established early, the people behind this film, would be a good thing in stoking giddiness. If I didn’t know better I would’ve just rolled on to another trailer but I had to wait literally until this trailer was all done to find out what pedigree this film had.

Selling a foreign film is tough enough without having to make dumb mistakes like this but I would lose nearly the entire first half and just launch into the ass kicking and explosions. Sorry, but it’s the truth.

The last half of this trailer brims with excitement, passion, violence, martial arts and the hint that one could enjoy 90 minutes of this; I sure as shit would after seeing what these two dudes can do. It’s far too small of a world to be sitting on this kind of flick for just regional audiences to enjoy. I want to watch other countries’ ass kickers, too.

Count me in on this one but just clean up this trailer.


SUPERMAN RETURNS (2006) Director: Bryan Singer
Cast: Brandon Routh, Kevin Spacey, Kate Bosworth, James Marsden, Frank Langella, Parker Posey, Kal Penn, Eva Saint Marie, Sam Huntington
Release: June 30, 2006
Synopsis: Following a mysterious absence of several years, the Man of Steel comes back to Earth in the epic action-adventure Superman Returns, a soaring new chapter in the saga of one of the world’s most beloved superheroes. While an old enemy plots to render him powerless once and for all, Superman (Brandon Routh) faces the heartbreaking realization that the woman he loves, Lois Lane (Kate Bosworth), has moved on with her life. Or has she? Superman’s bittersweet return challenges him to bridge the distance between them while finding a place in a society that has learned to survive without him. In an attempt to protect the world he loves from cataclysmic destruction, Superman embarks on an epic journey of redemption that takes him from the depths of the ocean to the far reaches of outer space.
View Trailer:
* Large (QuickTime)

Prognosis: Very Positive. I think it’s my laissez faire attitude about X-MEN 3 that has something to do with my eagerness to see what else Singer has in store with SUPERMAN.

You cannot see this trailer and not feel like you’ve been given a mainline injection of adrenaline straight to your fanboy cortex.

What I liked about the teaser many months ago was that not only did it give you a really nice nugget or two about what Routh is going to do with the character but I would assert, more importantly, it gave Singer a chance to show off what he has done directorially with the property. How could you not feel a twinge of something when you see young Clark Kent leaping and bounding through the cornfields? How you could deny Singer’s passion when you see the wonderfully composed shot of awe struck citizens when you know exactly what it is that they’re all looking at?

With this trailer, then, it’s time to let the people see more. The days of GODZILLA-like secrecy about denying people the chance to see the goods before the movie comes out are thankfully long since gone and it is the opening shots, the turn of the century feeling you get, like when you see Fritz Lang’s METROPOLIS, that a deliberate decision was made to how SUPERMAN was going to come to life. It’s easy to just gloss over this issue but when you can tell that a director had some kind of passion driving them it’s comforting as it is exciting.

As Luthor breaches the Fortress of Solitude and demands to know everything about our man in the tight maroon Speedo with Routh hovering above earth, his cape is effortlessly flapping gently, the gauntlet is tossed down quickly about who and what this movie will be dealing with.

I am annoyed slightly, though, by the rehashing of the teaser trailer with Ma Kent taking over the voiceover duties, us having to endure the same damn leaping in the cornfields with it being topped off with the same moment I spoke of earlier with the populace standing at shocked attention.

I quickly forget this as we finally get some motion out of Superman. Singer’s biggest issue to contend with, one of many I guess, is making Routh’s flying appear to have weight. One of the issues with SPIDER MAN’s initial installment was that a good effort was made to make it appear that Peter Parker was bound to rules of physics and that if he’s going to defy gravity with his aerial acrobatics he better look like gravity wants his ass back on the ground.

From the initial impression here, sure, it looks like Superman navigates his flying within our world. Later, when Routh turns his body mid-flight his hair appropriately flaps and it’s little details like this that will make believers out of haters.

I don’t have much appreciation, though, for Jimmy Olsen as he looks cut out of a bad Superman comic book. He appears smarmy, too much of a doofus and kind of flat. As he tells Clark that Lois has moved on and had a kid I feel like that would’ve been a perfect time for Bizzaro to pop up and squeeze Jimmy’s little melon head like a grapefruit.

Sure, there’s a little sense of back lot fakery when Superman and Lois have their first real moment, the top of the roof looks like it’s a manufactured façade which it most certainly is, but when the two of them fly off with one another it actually looks more realistic.

Luthor shows his bald head once more to do his thing and it just smells of greatness. There’s nothing like Spacey’s quiet craziness as he plays his role the way it should be played. Luthor, while apt at tossing out humorous lines, should be maniacal and given to rage, not like Gene Hackman’s buffoonery.

Oh, and Jimmy pops up again donning a bow tie and sweater. Seriously, where is Bizzaro and his head popping fetish? I know Superman is about having a nebbish secret identity but where does it state that he has to endure this geek’s nerdish vibe?

Anyway, Spacey comes back to get wild with Bosworth as his hostage and his screaming moment is pitch perfect as is Routh’s powerful landing on both feet which I think is actually one of the best shots in this trailer; you can sense the physicality, the weight and emotion of this character perfectly.

The other “best shot” in this trailer is the tearing apart of the airplane that is literally disintegrating as it hurdles towards the ground in flames. I am hopeful that this sequence really does challenge the notion that even though you use special effects you can show a man can fly and make it look more real than any of its predecessors.

Comments: None

Leave a Reply

FRED Entertaiment (RSS)